Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7855 SW DARTMOUTH STREET ADDRESS: i:\records\,microflm\targets\bui!dir•,,g doc Construction Inspection&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Corvsult(nq P.U. Box 23814 JOB No. ��__ }�. C Tigard,Oregor 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 REPORT O IN-PLACE DENSITY FAX FAX (503)684-0954 went . - . . _ -N I. ONS;T(41.1; 4-P.-INcit; �ni vA - --- —--- --- — - Project sn 'MaARD , OR Material Description ;?,/4 '--0 REWA — Max. Dry Density Viz`-lbs./cu.ft. Optimum Moisture _+r��_._ % Method of Test 4A�4 R T Serial is __ DATE OF TEST i % ADJ. ELEV. FIELD IN-PLACE DENSITY TEST I_O C AT i U N PARTICLES DENS. FT. MOISTURE (LF�S1Cu.FT. Y- � TION TEST NO _ _ -'�_ S1= N(_)RTH END W REMODLED Lt_t-1. 01 "'4 SF MTDDLE' i; �! _APrw PLICATION - STREET IMPROVEMENVEXCAVATION �I-DC� bE�'r/ vP'v TO: (WHITE)-FILE ORDINANCE NO. 74-14 jr"Y'T' / (YELLOW)-INSP. (PINK)-OTHER AGENCY (INSTF OMS ON SEPARATE SHEET) ` -- (E3LUE)-APPLICANT APPROVED u APrrLIC.ATION NO.: _-- NC T APPROVED ❑ C:11 Y 01. 11GARD, OREGON FEE AMT.: S PENDING FEE. PMT. ❑ CITY HALL 14 CEIPT Ne 5' 71/I�6 FENDING SECL'RIT\ ❑ PUL1LICWOR KSDEPARTMF.N7' BY - ? DATE__�—G_ .-1 -5-M PENDING, AGENCY "OK" ❑ :Application and ProArefs Record MAINTEUANCE BOND aw— PENDING INFOPMATION U FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT/EXCAVATION AS REQUIRED _• ANNU: L Q PZNDING VARIANCE ❑ EXPIRATION DATE: PEW"IT NO,: =111)I--1'-- _----, DATE ISSUED: BY: '"�•�.G�,.t Lam. (1) APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO R:240V-u DErWTIVF, _QgiC._ 3IDEWAL_ , A.PRCN__l_ LLAM� ._____ AS DE SCRIEED HEREIN, IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. APPLICAN' Robir>.w Conauucti,.m Ou. 21360 M4 CO&, all RId. Hillnb.;cw, OR 97124 645-8531 NAMte AOORrtl3 CITU — PHONE CONTRACTOR -._- Robinson ComtCuCtiUn CO u Sam- as &Wve - -- -- -- NA�1� A0501'"­ CITYH N N 6 H Pacific 8405 :�1 IVintxw Ave. ftrtl&vi, CR 97280 62 5 F L.ANS BY_._.— NAME. y/C�IT�yY -- E I�SfIM.>TFD Ih1PROVEMENT T07AL VALUATION ( COST): S XMM, 2,63O.W — -_ DOLLAR! FOR OFFICK L,!E: LMIN (2) EXCAVATION DATA: 171T 0.04 X s—=pjQ,a - s3TREET DESCRIPTION -PROGREESS & INSPECTION STATUSSURFACE CUT CUT CUT MATERIAL INSNAME ITEMDATE REMARKS/TYPE BV TYPE L[NGTH WIDTH DEPYH ITEM A, QLI [aI. tTIcaLlth - ate �_ -- 1-HskrFA --- — -- I{ TION ESTIMATED STREET L,PErdING RATE: T ESTIMATED JTREk.T CLOSING OAT'_. _ E D - - - ------------ - s T i� ( l) SECURITY NO. SE:CURITY AMT.: 2,630.00 630.00 E e T CLOSED _ SURETY CO.: �-I L I,, l v}, I ,. �� ;`, E Awk-, FINAL _ Cl RTI PIED_CN[CK C —�— CASH O •OND INSPEC, (4) PLO' PLAN: INDICATE SITE PERTINENT PHYSICAL SPECIAL PROVISIONS /CONDITIONS: rEATURES; EXCAVATION LOCATION AND EX'rENT. - ,seta a,.tached - S. W. A-lrtmouth W I iTc7t:`KK - SITA;t 7855 SW C tmcuth St. (5I NOTE THE CITY OF TIGARD DOES NOT, HEREBY, GRANT PERMISSION TO APPLICANTS TO CONDUCT WORK WI:ERE RIGHT OF-WAY JURISDIr'TION IS THAT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OR THE STATE OF OREGON. THE APPLICANT AGREE, TO DEPOSIT THE REQUIRED SECURITIES, TO COMPLY WITH ALL PERTINENT LAWS AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS PFRTINFNT TO CONDUCT OF THE WORK, AND TO SAYE HARMLESS THE CITY AND EMPLOYEES AGAINST ANY INJURY OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY RESULT X'^UM APPLICANTS ACTIONS. APDL ICANTS SIGNATURE ! _~�� DATE 1�,� �V / CERTIFICATE Cif- CITY OF T I A D PERMIT #0(-. . . .!IPANCY. . . -. BUP94-0001 "COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE IS�3-UED- 05/23/95 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Orogon 072.2"P8199 (W3)639-4171 -WS5 171ARCEL_s SITE ADDRESIS. . . s 074PSO SW DARTMOUTH GT 3UBD I V 181 ON. . . . : 70NINGi SI-OCK. . . . . . . . . . s L OT. . . . . . . CLA35IG OF WORK. -NEW TYi-[.- OF USE. . . xCOM OCCUPANCY GRP. o82 uL;CUPi,4NCY LOAD:363!, TENf4NT NAME. . . eCOSTCO P Remarks Costco Store— new v-etail b(Ailding. ow)-)ov- 3 PRICE/1"OSTC0 tosevi iaoTH AVE 14E KIR10 AND WA 96083 PhGne 02 206--881 -7600 C,;-wtr,actorl E, LE". ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION 21360 NW CORNELL ROAD HIL I-1400RO OR 97124 Phone #t Reg #. . s 63147 Occupancy ;:,if the ahw.-e referenced buildinU is twereby given, acid r'eVJ i f iL . the compliance with %he State Of Oregon Spea-ialJy/AdweAs is for r trio gcups zy, Rvid i-ise undet whi(--h the reftwu ened per , I it 4p v d. Li �Nt SU 1 Nu TOR L 0 FICIAL. POST IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE ,r Page unMlod 8eww.g.Agency of of 7 Sorucs Confrol Ser0cow Department 400 E. In.Su"o 230 Hllkboru,Orogon 9/129 (603)693 AMI BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE ceo3>e4e-M74rax INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT Permit No:_- 1 11--1p3-l. �_. Treatment Rant: Ui,rhayn Map/Tax No: ISI 36CU 0120 SIC No.(s): /384 —_itEffective Date: __U5/lb/25___-- Expiration Date: 05/16/96 In accordance with the provisions of Unified Sewerage Agency's Resolution& Order 92-60,or as amended, ,iholesale :hotu Fini3h (Permittee's name) 7855 S.W. Dartmouth St. , Tigard, 014 97223 (Permitfee's location address) (hsrein known as Pemiitfee)is hereby authorized to discharge industrial waSIOWat6r from the above identified facility, and through the discharge points Identified in Soction 1.A., into the Unified Sewerage Agency's sanitary sewer system in accordance with the conditions set forth in this permit. Compliance with this permit does not relieve the Permittee of its obligation to comply with any or all applicable pretreatment regulations, standards or requirements under local, State, and Federal laws, including any such regulations. standards, requirements,ar laws that may become effective during the term of this permit. Noncom- pliance with any term or condition of this permit, or any compliance schedul9, shall constitute a violation of the I Inified Sewerage Agency's sewer use ordinance(s),and may be grounds for administrative action or enforcement Proceedings including civil or criminal penalties, injunctive relief, and summary abaterntint. In no case shall this permit be transferred to another owner, partnership or corporation without prior written permission from the Agency. Permittees wishing to transfer a permit to a new owner must notify the Agency In wriring at least 60 days In advance of any anticipated transfer. Written notification must include Information by the new owner which certifies the new owner's intent not to change the facility's operations or processes, Identifies the specific date on which the transfer Is to occur, and acknowledges full responsibility for complying with the wastewater discharge permit. The new owner/operator shall be provided a copy of this permit by the previous owner/operator. Failure to provide advance notice of a transfer renders the wastewater permit voidable on the date of the owner- ship transfer. If the Permittee wishes to continue to discharge atter the expiration date of this permit, an application may be required for renewal a minimum of 90 days prior to the expiration date, In accordance with the requirements of the Agency's Rgsolution& Order 92-60, Sections 3.03 and 3.11,or as amended. By: �` -- ----- Source Control Manager Issued this 16ch_—day of�??i� 19 ReHsed OW13 White-USA, Green-Industry, canary-City, Pink-Acmunting, Goldenrod-WOL Farm 0993.48 pagh unlfled ewY« a Meng 207 Source mtrol Servk_ai Detadment 4u0 F - An.Sure 200 Hlkt'r,v,Oregon 9712 M11"93-4541 SECTION 1 (&I 54e-8674FAx BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES - REQUIRZMENTS I.A. During the effective period of this permit,the P6rmittee is authorized to dlscharge process wastewater from the cutfalls listed below: Outfall Number Description(Refer to dagrams on Page a of sI 001 treated "m ty, ar bleach tiv and tt t�l��+ i►rr 002 The discharge(s) from the above identified ouri'alls must be maintained at all times through the Best Management Practices (3MP) described below. If, upon inspection of the facility by Agency staff, It is determined that BMP's have not b,3en complied w4h;or if upon the collection and analysis of a waste'Nater sample, pollutants of concern exceed esiablished operating limits, increased monitoring and/or additional prAreatment may be required. DESCRIPTION OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRAG 17CES I PruVerly OPrtate 11110 ntwuttua><VdVet tttevvdty wuts, ?. keep►tta3nterilance a-eccn-dr of the sdvrr rlecover%,ervstern for revitaw by :kgettcv atatf, 1 UhrTe ehah be no domping of conceit,,itted procetm chemlicgls of ctmeentrateti w,ieiv* alto the scttutwy jawer lvithout tenor written spprovA from this:lpency. 1.B. Any collection,preservation, handling and laboratory analyses of samples for compliance monitoring shall be performed In accordance with 40 CFR Part 136, and ammendmento.thereto,unless specified otherwise In this permit. Analytical techniques for addHonal pollutarts not contained In Part 136 must be performed by using validated analytical methods approves!by EPA and the Agency. RevJsed 04Ol9 Willa USA, Careen-Industry, Canary-city, rink-Accounting, 3oldenrod-w01- Form 0893.19 Page Unllled 3evNMi Agwvy J of 7 Source Comm'Serves Department 400 E Wah,Sulfa 200 Hlkboro,r:regon 97123 (503)6"J 4541 (1.03)648.8074 FAX SECTION 1 (continued) I.C. Per 40 CFH Part 403.5 (a), (b) and Unified Sewerage Agency's Resolution& Order 92-60, Sections 2.01 and 2.02,or as amended,the Permittee,hail not discharge wastewater containing any of the following prohlbi- tions from any of their permitted outfails: GENERAL DISCHARGE PROHIBITIONS The Permittee shall not discharge, cause or permit to be discharged, directly or indirectly, any pollutant or wastewater which will cause interference or pass through at the treatment plant(s). These general and specific prohibitions apply to all users of the Agency's wastewater system whether or nrt they are subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards or any other national, state or local pretreatment standards'or requirements SPECIFIC PROHIBITIONS The Permitt9e may nct discharge to the sanitary sewer system any of the specific prohibitions as identified In 40 CFR Part 403.5(b) and Unified Sewerage Agency's Resolution S Order 92-60, Section 2.02,or at .mended. SECTION 2 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 2.A.1. Accidental Spill Prevention Plan(ASPP) -An ASPP may be required for notification of potential problems Tnis plan, per the requirements In 40 CFR Part 403.8(1), is necessary to assess the emergency planning of the Permittee in case of a slug load or chemical spill In the facility. The report must address the steps the Permittee will take to keep spilled or unused chemicals out of the sanitary/storm sewers, either by intentional or accidental release, and include notification procedures to the Agency. 2.A.2. Sp4l Notification- In the event of any spill, slug discharge or problem discharge into the Agency's treat- ment system, the permitleo shall immediately (within 2 hours) notify the Agency by telephone of the Incident and shall provide such information as may be required at that time to assess the Impact of the incident on the Agency's system or on water quality. Within fivo (5) business days following any such incident,the permittee shall submit to the Agency a detailed written report containing a description of the incident and Its cause;its location within the permitte,3's facility;exact dates/times of the period of problem discharge and, if not yet cor- rected, the anticipated time the Incident Is expected to end; and, steps taken (or planned) to correct the Incident and to reduce, eliminate and prevent occurrences of future Incidents. A problem discharge means any upset, slug discharge, spill or accident which results (or may result) in a dis- charge Into the Agency's treatment system of a prohibited substance;or of a regulated substance in excess of permit limits and which may: (a)cause interiereoce or pass through at the treatment plant;or(b)contribute to a violation of any requirement of the Agency's NPDES permit;or(c)cause violation of any State or Fr ,rat water quality slandard. During normal business hours, notifications may be made by calling the Source Control Division at 693-4,541. Emergency notifications may be made after hours/weekendsrholidays by calling the duty officer at 784-6229. 2.B, The Permittee shall immediately repert any significant changes(permanent or temporary)to the premises or operations that cause substantial changr in production; volume or characterr of the wastewater discharge, or Revised 05/93 White-USA, Green-Industry, Cannry•City, Pink-Accounting, Goldenrod WOL Form 00011.60 " Uf 4 Page ned B�werepe Agency 4 of 7 Source Control Servken Department 400 E.Moen,SuRe 200 Hllhboro.Oregon 97123 (503)693-4&11 (50J)6486814 FAX SEI;T101V 2 (continued) deviatss from the terms and conditions of this permit, per the requirements in 40 CFR Parts 403.12(J) end 403.6(c)(7). Unless emergewy cul rritions prevail, the Agency requires that charges be reported prior to being Implemented. At least 90 days prior to commencement of a new discharge, existing users which have chanysd operations or processes shall be requi•ed to submit an Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit Application per the regjIre- ments in Agency RF solution & Ordar 92-60. Section 3.03. All reports and.notifications shall be submitted to: Unified Sewerage Agency Source Control Division 400 Last Main St., Suite 200 Hillsboro, OR 97123 (503)693-4541 FAX(50)693-4884 See requirements in Section 3 2.C. Notification frern the Permittee is required to the Agency, the EPA RCHA Direc'or, and the Oregon State Hazardous Waste Director within 90 days M the effective date of a publi;:hed RCRA ruling, of a discharge(or changed discharge) of either a listed or characteristic hazardous haste to the sanitary sewer, per the require- ments in 40 CFR Part 403.12(p). The Agency rerruests notificat(on even if the results of the hazardous material sampling are submitted on self-monitoring reports (Periodic Compliance Reports). 2.0. An"Upset", and an affirmative defense for such, shall riot be allowed under circumstances where non- cumpliance has been caused by operational error. Improperly designed or inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventative maintenance, or careless or improper operation. In case of an upset or upon reduction, loss or failure of its treatment facility, the permittee shall control production and/or all discharges tc the extent necessary to maintain compliance with applicable pretreatment standards until treatment is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This requirement also applies in situations where the primary source of power for the treatment facility is reduced, last or fails. 2.E. Bypass: the intentional diversion of one or more wastestreams or processes from any portion of the permit- tee's treatment facility is prohibited per the Agency's Industrial Sewer Use Rules and Regulations R&O 92-60. R*Wsed 0WM White-USA, Green-Industry, Canary-City, Pink-Acmunting, Goldenrod-WQI- Form('993-51 R71 'RPM Page UnlfWd 9awsropa Apwncy 5 of 7 Scurce Control$Urtica/Doporlmem 4.10 E.Ndn,Suns 200 1-114boro,Orogon 97123 (603)6934541 SECTION 3 (603)b<ts.>e'a FAX NOTIFICATION & RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS 3.A. Any Permittee subject to reporting requirements In 40 GFR Part 403.12 shall retain and preserve all reoards, books, documents, memoranda, reports, correspondence and any and all summaries thereof, relating to monitor- ing,sampling and chemical analyses made by or on behah of an the Permittee in connection wl1h Its discharge. Such records shall be subject �o review by the Agency, and shall include for all samples: 1) The date, exact place, time, and methods of sampling or measurements, and sampling preservation techniques; 2) Who performed Me sampling or measuremRnts; 3) The daie!sj tho ar WySes were performed: 4) Who performed th6 a;aly`es; 5) The analytical techniques or methods used, and 6) The results of such analyses. 3.13. The Parmittee shall retain for a minimum of three years all such records defined in Section 3.A. above, and shall make such records available for in3pection and copying by the Agency,the DE© Director and the EPA Regional Administrator. This period may be extended by the request of the Agency at any time. All records that pertain to matters that are the subject of special orders or any ether enforcement or litigation activities brought by the Agency shall be retained ano preserved by the p6;mitee until all enforcement ar:tivities have concllyded and all periods of limitation with respect to any and all appeals have expired. 3C. For any information faxed to the Agency,the original shall he retained on the pormitteef's premises Por a minimum of three (3) years:or the original shall be "tailed to the Agency as a follow-up to the fax. SECTION 4 s"f ANDA!RD CONDITIONS 4,A. Permit Modification The/Agency reserves the right to amend any Wastewater Discharge Permit issued hereunder for good cause Including, but not limited to the following: 1) To incorporate any new or revised local, .State or Federal pretreatment standards or requirements; P) Alterations or additions to the Ponniti'ee s operations, processes, discharge volume or characteristic not crnsidered in dr.fting the original permit; 3) A change in any condition at the Periniffee's facility or the POTW requiring a temporary or permanent seduction r elimination of the authorized discharge; 4) Information indicating that the permitted discharge poses a threat to the POTW's collection or treatment systems,personnel or receiving waters; 5) Violation of any terms or conditions of the permit; 6) Misrepresantativn or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts in the permit application or any required reporting; 7) Revision of, or a grant of variance from applicable categorical standards per 40 GFR Part 403.13, 403.6(e),Qnd 4(3.15; B) To Correct typographical or other errors in the penr,it; 9) To rotlect transfer of the faciflty ownership and/or operation to a new owner/operator; Revised 09,00 Vibite-USA. Green-Industry, Cenery-City, NO•Acoountiny, Goldenrod.WOL Form 0993.32 cf) e Page sew.repe Ap.rky 6 of 7 Soup:*Conlroi Servlcet Deportment 400 E.Main,Sidle 700 Hllbt>orr ')—gon 01173 (603)6V.I"I (6p3)Adi BBId FA)( SECTION 4(continued) 10) Upon request of the permitted Industrial User, provided the request does not violate any requirements, standards, laws, rules or regulations; 11) zo incorporate any new or revised constituent limit resulting from the Agency's reevaluation of its local limits. 4.8. Dilution Prohibition The permittee shall not Increase the use of potable or process water in any way for the purpose of diluting a discharge as a partial or complete substitute to adequate treatment to achieve compliance with the standards set forth in this discharge permit or any Agency ordinances, or in lieu of proper disposal of any material as solid waste. The Agency may impose mass limitations on dischargers which in its judgement appear to be using dilution to meet applicable pretreatment standards or requirements of this section, or in cases where the imposi- tion of mass iimitations is otherwise deemed appropiate by the Agency. 4.C. Representative Sampling Sampies and measurements taken as required by this permit shall be representative of the volume and nature of the monitored discharge. All samples shall be taken at the monitoring points specified in this permit, and unless otherwi!;e specified,. before tho permitted discharge joins or is diluted by any ot'ier wastestreams, body of water or substance. All equipment used for sampling and analyses must be routinely calibrated, inspected and maintained to ensure itE CCcuracy. Monitoring points shall not be changed without notification to, and approval from the Agency. 4.A. inspection and Entry The Agency may Inspect the fac!Iities of any Permittee to determine compliance with the requirements of the Agency rules and regulations. The Permittee shat!allow the Agency or its representatives to enter upon the premises of the Permittee at all reasonable hours and without prior notification by the Agency, for the purposes of inspection, sampling, and records examination and copying. The Agency shall have the right to set upon the Permitlee's property such devices as are necessary to conduct sampling, Inspection, compliance monitoring and, or metering operations. 4.E. Proper Disposal of Sludges,16uent Chemicals The disposal of pretreatment sludges and spent chemicals shall be done In accordance>n.,ith Section 405 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Subt' ies C & D of the Resource Conservation & Rccovery Act (RCRA), and any tate hazardous waste requiremG,its. 4.F. Falsifyiog Information/ranipering With.Monitoring Equipment Knowingly rnaKing any false statement on any report or other document required by this permit, or know'ngly rendering any monitoring method or device inatcurate, may result in punishment under criminal lawn of the Agency, as well as being subject to civil penaliiec and relief. 4.G. Emergency Suspension of SorviceVRevocation of permit The Agency ri.ay suspend the wastewater permit Ci a Permittee,whenever necessary in order to stop an actual or threatened discharge which reasonably appears to present or cause an Imminent or substantial endangerment to the health or welfare of persons, Interferes with the operation of the Agency's wastewater system,or which present or may present an endangerment to the e7vironme• '. In addition to further penalties and remedies in any Ordinances o- R&O,the Agency may terminaht the wastewa- ter permit of any Permittee for violations of any Ordinance, R&O, or discharge permit condition. Revised 09193 White-USA, Green-industry, Canary City, Pink-Accounting, Goldenrod-WOL Form 0993-53 '� • �� Page UnI1Md 8ewerepa Aper" i of 7 SourceControl Servic"Deparf rneof 400 E.Z.Suite 200 KNhboro,Oregon 97123 (5503)669674 FAY SECTION 5 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 5..4. Additional Reporth,g 1. An Accidental Spill Prote0on Plan{ASPP)is clue no later than:-_' �. phis plan is required to assess the emorgeecy planning of the Permittee in case of a chemical spill in their facility per the requirements in 40 CFR 403.8(f). 2. Additional Provisions or Reporting BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT SAMPLE SITE LOCATION Fermft No: 111-203-1 Issue Date:')5/16/95 The following outfall sample sites are the official Agency and Permfttee sample Collection locations. A separate cyanide sampling point is included, if required. NII samples collected for compliance monitoring must be oblail ted from these sites. lI'rample,am iegwrel they shall he collected at the outfall ul'the Aver rwuvery utut. Revised 09'93 Min•USA. Green Industry, Cana y, Pink•Awmi,tlng, Goldenrod-WOL Form 0993-54 i CITY OF TIGARD Washinr-tcn County, Oregon CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF INFRACTION �REC.',1N PERMIT # SIT-94.0006ZBUP94-0001 DATE: 12-1 -9A_— ADDRESS • 78 .50 SW DARTMOUTH TAX MAP : j-31.3 6 CP 0 0 OWNER CONTRACTOR TC: PP!CE COSTCn TO:E- EE ROBINSON CONST. 10809 120TH AVE. NL 7320 SW HUNZIKER ST KIRKLAND, WA 98083_ SUITE 300 'TIG D,_OR 97223 7t has keen determined that the following activity(ies) or condition(s) is/are ali infraction (s) as defined by the Tigard Municipal Code : OPEN PUBLIC STAIRWAYS WITH NO HANDRAILS OR BARRICADES - COMPLETELY OPEN TO_PUa]LIC USES WHICH COULD RESULT IN SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH. You may contact_ me by phone at 639-4171 . You must remedy the alleged infraction by the date and time indicated below or the City will file a summons/complaint against you. The following action to remedy the infraction must be completed by IMMEDIATELY at _ in the following manner: DATE. TIME IMMEDIATELY FIX ABOVE PROBLEM AND CALL FOR INSPECTION. If this remedial action is not taken by the time and date indicated. a uniform summons and complaint will be. issued, and a penalty of $250 . 00 per day per violation, plus hearing fees, may be imposed upon you pursuant to the Tigard Municipal Code. CITY OF GARD BY: Thomas L; 41-1?i'ldj,ng itI pector (Print Natne) C! Coat, o, 7850 SW Dartmouth Mulvany Pzrtnerahip jf;infrac.1 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (5031639-4171 TDD (503) 584-2772 LN-SPECTION NOTICE City of Tiga:d Building-D.WL't:aent 13175 SW Ball Blvd. Tigard, Inspect{an I,L223 ne (Rec-o_Phonaj: 639_4175 RrP n Phone: 639-4].71 Inspection: — ____..__--------._--.-- rooting lbg. Undernlab Mech. Rough-in A Pound. ppr/sdwlk Plbg. Top out Gas kA ne Pi Pont/Baan Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg, Post/Beam Mech. Rain Drain -�-�> Insulation �:..�. Plbg. Underfloor Mater Line `-ch. Gyp. Bd. -Hoch. Date Requested:_ L Tice i AK Addraee: - PN Permit —UCj(p� Rulldarl� •� �( TBS POLIAMINO C)RMCTICOS ARE REQUIRED: a ! Inspec i Date: PROM DISAPPROVRD -�-1-- _ 11PPROVE,ry 8DBJSCT TO ADM -Call Por Reinep. I1iSPECTION NOTI City of Tigard Building pepartasnt 13125 SW Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223,' Inspection Line (Roc-41�-Phone)s 639-4175 Business Phone: 5_0-4171 Inspections ----_ i Footing Plbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Tut Gas line FINALS ) Post/Bea.n Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldq. Post/Beam Mach. Rain Drain Insulation -Plu lbg. Underfloor Nater Line q(� Gyp. Bd. -Nech. Date Re,.Viesteds_ ��� �,1y-.0 {I / _ Tivas �-�(���L19 PM AddAaus �S \JUIN ry' _ Permit 1s k (f/ Bu LIE rrs -- - 11 t-, THE FOLS,OPtINII CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inepp�.oc: Date:tea �APPRO:F.[` DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE Call For Reinap. CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TEMPORARY CF:RTTF?C0TL 13125 BW H&N Blvd.Tigerd,Oregon 9722308199 (503)639-4171 OF OCCi)F,nNCY Y X X X RE:R141T DATE ISSUED: 16 1.2yll?q SITE ADDRESS. — t Waf5,5-SW PARTMOUTH ST SUBDIVISION. . . . I ZONINO.- BLOCK. . . . . . . . . . LOT. . . . . . . . . . Ci-ASS OF' WORK. 1,1F,'W TYPL DF USE. . . »(.',()M OCCUPANCY 131-_P. »Vi(? OCCUPANCY LOAD, TENANT NAP1L. - . :COS'1A (J Remarks: 11-:MPORARY OCCUPANCY FOR Dwes v-twil ])A.rE of. issmmu... Castco Stare-- n-w -retail building. 30,-DAY TEMPORARY CERTTFTCATP OF OCCUPONCY SGUED 10/24/94. PRILL/C06rCO 108013 AVE NE. I!IRVLAND WA 98083 E. LEF. ROES INSON COMSTRUCTION '7320 SW HUNZIKER ST. SUITE 300 TTCARD OR 97223 Phone ##f5 645-8531 Reg ##. . v 6314V Occupancy of the above referenced building isk hereby given, aiml cep-t-iti-e% I.,he compliance With (Ale StaLe 0-f Oregon Sper.Jalty Codes for the groopq ()ccopancy, and USE? under which the referenced permit was issilt(-H ...................... 211LUi A.- 06 FICIAL POST* IN CONSPICUOUS P1 ACE �ASPB_CT ION NOTIC$ City of Tigard Building DgWtsebt. 13125 Std Rall Blau. Tigard, Oregon 97223 inspection Line (ROC-o-Phone)s 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection:/ 1^ Footing � N;1lbg- Mech. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Fcxrnd. Plbg. Top out tics Line FINAL:` Fest/Beam £t_ruct. San- Sewer Frnmi.ng ld Post/Beam !tech. Rain Drain Insulation ��� lumb,J i Plbg. Underfloor slater Line Oyp- gd, Och. i Date Requested: � / ---Tlme Ti� AM _ PM Address:------ -- --_ -_- Permit Builder: —� __._ - ---_•--- -. TB= FOLI.OMING X/RRECTIONS ?,RR RAQUIRRD: 412 -_ f Inspector: - _ APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVRD StJWECT TO ABOVE Call For Reinep. INBPE.,TION NOTIO /LI,E'c City of T1Llazd Building I/apart omt 13125 8f► Ball Blvd. TI.- .late, Oregon 972 ll�� Inspection Line (Hoc-O-Phone): 639-41iL Business P Inspections- Footing nspection:looting Plbg. Undernlab Mach. Rou;Th-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Ilbg. Top Out gas Line J Post/Beam 'ftruct. San. Sewer Framing / Post./Roam 94:h. Rain Drain Insulation 1- _plumb. Pl.bg. Undw-wZloor Nater Line 11 Gyp. Rd. (flech.' Date Reyuesttteds / ! �y Timor ��/��l —PH Address:ZO�t�� Permit: 1:F ' -000 I Builder: 7& l -,� O Cd p ,�r,� THE FOLLOWING COR..ECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: rep Le _ Inspector: ..... eDate: Z PPRCVED DISP.FPROVED r APPROr;LD SUBJISCr TO ABOVE -----Call For Rainep.. Cnnstructior Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6M`-'`' CONCRETE _TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Te-IMethods: ASTM C172iC14&/t;1064/C1231/C31/C39 Phone(503)684-346C -- — FAX#684-0954 Date Moldad: - 10/21 . 19- 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: PR7?CE COSTCU C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: C05TC0 'TIGARD STORE 1 t�,,S„ — --------- .----- �_—� Address: T I GARD 'OR Contractor: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION -Sub Contractor: ----- --Concrete Supplies: _ ----- LONE STAR NORTHWEST Truck No. _ 1 f' -� Ticket No. —230298 — - --- Cast By: — H .P . MURPHYLoad Nu.1 - -- -- --- -------- RAINY 64 48 Weather: -_ - - — -- Temp.High: —_ ___._----Temp.Low: DARTMOUTH STREET PATCH _ I ovation of Placement: _-- —-- ----------- - ----- -- -- h — -_Test"rime: _ --_ Concrete Temo: 2 t3 X000 ?" Strength Requirement: -- days Slump --.--- Cement Type — — 766 3/a Mix No./No.Sacks -- AirCmtent -------------- Max.Aggrepate -- Admix.Amount: _ Brand: __ _-_Admix.Amount: — --..._____---___-_Brand: --- - Set Test® Register Date I [etc Total Area Unit Repport Tested No. Days Number Reed ""�st Load PSI tVo. By 3 8090 10/24 1v/?. 134,170 28.32 4740 70 JB 7 8090 10/24 10/2E 147,030 28.35 5190 71 JB 28 8090 10/24 11/1 28 8090 10/24 11/1 Remarks: cc:C I TY Or T I GARD ION CO imt rmaHnn rnntainarl haraln it not fn hp renrnduced.excent in full,without prior authorization from this office. OAGRA AGRA Earth s Environmental, Inc. Earth & Environmental 7477 Sd,Tech Center Drive Portland,Oregon U.S.A. 97223-8025 Tel (503)639-3400 O..tober 14, 1994 Fax (503)620-7892 21-06984-03 RECEIVED Mr. David Scott, P.E., Building Official OCT 17 1994 City of Tigard CO�JMI!NITY DEVELOPMENT Community Development Department 13125 Southwest Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 9: 22.3 Dear Mr. Scott: RE: END OF PROJECT SUMMARY LETTER PRICE COSTCO DEVELOPMENT TIGARD, OREGON In accordance with Chapter 306 of the Uniform Building Code, we are writing this letter to summarize our observations on the subject site. We have provided special inspections for th% placement of fill, the foundation bearing surfaces, and the construction of the site pavements. Based upon this work and to the best of our knowledge, all of the work observed appears to have been constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, our recommendations, and the Uniform Buildinq Code. We hope that the above iWormation meets your needs and requirements. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, AGRA Earth and Environmentai, I AFD PROGIN FF Stuart Albright, Rod P.E. i Senior Geotechnical Engine r d,Gsso )'26 +T A LBF EXPIRES 12130`3 4 Engineenng&Environmental Services xmsmc ON NOTICE City of Tigard buildinq Department 13125 SW Hall BIRI_ Tigard„ Oregon 47223 Inspection Lin�(Roc-0-Phone): 634-4175 rusiness Phone: 71 MM c t i Inspection: •� � /'C. J ys TC f� —_/�� / Footing Pl.bg. Underli'ab Mach. Rough-in Appr/.'Awlk Found. Plbg. Toy Out Gas Line FINAL: Post/Beam St:ruct. San. Sauer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Mech. Rain P-ain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Lina„ Gyp. Bd. -Hoch. Date Raquostedt � 1/r Tjattt _1J1 _pH Address z_ .Permit 7 ` Builder:— L ?Li THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Tnapector: - -- APPROVED DI.^,hPPRf)VFD APPROVED SUBJISCT TO ABOVE —. Call Por Reinsp. r JNMICTION NOTICE City of Tigard Bui:divg Department 13125 8w Hall Blvd. Tigard, Dragon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phons)t 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection:_-._ Foot Ing P?.k%. Un slab Mach. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Pound. Plbq. Top ;,., Can Line FINAL$ Post/Beam struct. Ban. Sewer tramirg -Bldg. Poet/Beam MFch. Rain Drain Insulation -PIM6. Plbg. Underfloor water Line Gyp. Bd. _Kwb, Date Requestedt -Time: _ AM Addresst-:ESS _W= & I[/ - Permit C Builder: y'� 31 Z_ TIM FIAZLOWING COPRECTIONs RED t Inspect 7 — _— —-- �� — - Date: APPR'VED APPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO A ---Call For Rsinsp. INUC ION NOTICE �� f City of Tigard Building Departaeot 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Gregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone; 4171 Inspectton; _�l ��- r�------- Footirg Plbg. Underslab Hoch. Rough-ire App,/Sdwi.k Pound. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL: Post/Bear, Struct. San. Sower. Framing Bldg. Pont/Beam Hoch. Rain Drain Insulation -rhumb. Plbg. Underfloor Water Lina i -Hoch. Dare Requested; A, -T1me; ------ — PH Address;J — Permit ft _��/-OOd� _1 Builder; THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED; Inspector: Data: V..PPROVED DISAPPRCOM APPROVED SUMTEC'T TO ABOVE -;_all For Reinep. INSPFCfION NOTICE City of Tigard Fuilding Department 13125 SW Kell Blvd. Tigard, oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 6.19-4175 Business Ph 39-4171 Inspection:-. '?�'` Footing Plbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINALS Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Fram/inq, 4 ,71- -Bldg. Post/Beam Mech. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Uuderfloot Hater Liine/ ry Gyp. Bd. -Mechy Date Requested! _ /1 Z-6 I tl _Time: ' I�M Addreset � Permit itt��* el Bu i.)doe! .` T7 T!Tr Ff1T.TnW1ur MRREOTIONS ARE APOUIRED: Inspector _!- -----_---- Date:me./ - APPROVED DISAPP:.aVRD APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE T Call For Reinnp. 13--66 —_ ---- INSTAL-L ATION OF SF R,NIU.ER SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR'S MATERIAL_&TEST CERTIFICA fF_'FOR A13OVEGROUNDPIPING L"'m m"Amlon d—k,V%P1db..■rw w•Uro b■"I'd*M u» I w v"m;v. ti W 1r 1w*r■■■A S V1 ew.■f.rdol." Y--- r ■pbr•I 10 ",A-bw( ♦nrnrlool.r,*—.w r—low&"-V, .f`�—LM".M .h1.ry—o. d 1M A mtrcros.hap M 1111d dA W.ki—try hnrh rafvAa�nt�M■.CapM.NJ a rss■r■rM'■.1�a.ur■h ro"q W-114da My dun glah■t rnr■r�tyx W' �a rn4v,.ytlbrty.a- ■*devgracbr.1 Y wd■. .W th,o.nw.rp- IOilal aMrrnst• 1r`L pv va.h�nen.Vp,a 111uw b ampll.Ah■PPr-"—h.1Y.'t'Iuw—w■.a PRDPE n TY NAPE ... .__._— DAT A PROPERTr AOOfifSG-�`— - �A1PTI►�Dim Q� "�� Rr7 f—u ACCEPTEoeY.IPProtNG f- vnlEs(NAAILI "�------�.---------- PUNS '.Wfl—ALATk>N C0fiFORIIS TO ACCEPTED PIANS -- - �---- FOLWMENT tXXD IS APPFVWEO 0 rs ONO F NO,EXPLAIN DEVIATIONS vlES O NO —� H&S PF n50N N C11AWIE OF GInE EWn'MFNT BEEN!t5 TRUCTEO AS TO IACAl1pN i NO.E)IPIAIN — OF CONTROL'VALVES ATq GAAP AND MAAYTI7dANCE OF THIS NEW RXWMEN" ONO 1115 Tnuc AC NS IIAYT COPIES OF fIC FOLLOYIMr3 BEEN LEFT ON TI#PREMLSES�_ ' SYSTEM CUYPONENTS NSTIY1CTMS --O VES ONO t CARE AND MAWTENANCE WSTRIXTK)NS O VES ONO S.NFPA lU OYES ONO .— LOCATION .— O VES ONO OF SVS TEY SJPPLESBUILDMIGS _ YNR ��� OR"LX TEMPERATURE _ MODEL YMTJFACTURE OR; CUANTTTY RATING SPFlINKLEAS =_.1_ Q . f — 1' — �L= --- RPE AO TTp■d Pip■ Cr�_40 ---- FITTINGS T"d Fin hp ALARM MAIIMLIY TIME TOOPERATT AII.RM OF VICE VALVE NpE -- _ 11TROUON TEST ODNNEf'1KMI OR r1.OW MAKE MULL YK SEC. INDICATOR DRY VALVE _— WAKE M(10E1 SERIN.NO. — 4AKE -- MODEL SERIAL NO. TIME TO TRIP T11RU TEST yyAZq TIME WATER ALARM ORY RPE l'.4RU TEST P AIR TAP POM KACIEO OPERATED OPERATING - _ PRESSURE PRf.SSURE AIR PRESSURE LEST OUTLET" PROPERLY TTST YIN. SEC. -' PSI PSI PSI MfI, Wthm,r — SEC. YE5 NO Dao - whn OUD --- IF 1°ASURED FROM TIME NSFECTORS TEST COITNECTgN LS OPENED. _ �SAT10bi PnRRED N USA. (OVER) Figure 1991 Edrtwn --^_---- _ `1STEM ACCEPTANCE 15--67 O PNEUMAT)C O ELECTRIC O HYDRAUUC�P1NG Sl1PE RVLtiL'Cl OYES -- O NO EiECi*10 EDIA SUPE—RV18f_0 O YES O NO� UOES'VA�VE CPERATE FNOY THE MANUAL iR'N M:OIOH REYOTc CONTROL 3IATION,4 _ _ OYL3 ONO D AWA A ' "..LYES _ .0 YES O NO YAX MUMM IOMA -- MAKE MODEL I;PERVLSION LOSS ALARM OPERATE VALVE RCLEASE OPFTIATE RELEASE t iIAI1G 1lTdloKsk wa sw W nrde Al nol I`—vun SUp —— --- berg br 1wo hpAa OMer�nW pd(l le e.nl wr W.N. w;W(!A bi"I.bo,..Ylle p,.0 j h TEST I,.elepp.d NYPbe ww dl�Ml ANe M 41 apAn a'++B)eel lot aeYMe ean.p.-AlI Aboyeprauld P�'q�+� DESCTr1PT1ON PYElAW1G:CdAbGL%40 Del(2.7 Iwe)w pn —eM In w,dmp r,�+l ska nae Sep W I.1, Imft p)p 1 Nen)ti N MaA.Too pnMp".—.AI 1bM1111 weer level..Jar preNlA HIA r1leMure Ak aeuve bcQ r_.!-A.AY nal noeF1 1-I!Z f D 10.1 UN In 21 NDA. ALL PIPNGIOMAOSTATICALIY TESTED A71_ --' —' J PSI FOR___Z_!,'S. F NO,STATE REASON ORY PIPNf:PNEUMATICALLY TESTED O YES m-mb EOUPYENT OPFMTLS PROPERLY 0-r1'S O NO DO YOU CERN IEY AS SI'RINKI..R C(.TN fU1L I w4—A75(T NTWT,g AIN CCTARDSIVE Lij)—A SILA:A E R" OE RNATIVES OF SODIUM Sl LATE,B RINE,OR OTHER CORROSIVE C1EMCALS WERE!U)F UIXO FOR TESTING SYSTEMS OR IS STOPPNGLEAKSI_O YES O NO DRAIA REARM OF GAGE LOCATED NEAR WATER RESIDUAL PRESSURF WITH VALVE N TEST TEST SUPPLYTESTOONNECTION: r32 _pSI COMIECTn4 OPEN WIDE PSI UNDIF RGROUNO MANS ANU BEAD N CONNECTIONS TO SYSTEM RISERS FUUSI4CO BEFORE CONNECTKTN MALTS TO SP RINKL.F.RPIPING. VERIFIED BY COPY OF T14F.U FORM NO./se eYl'ES (:!NO F—TH7, FLUSHED BY NS TALLER OF UNOER- T)ROUNOSPRINIO.EA^IPNG A- NO BLANK TFSTND NUMBS USED LOC:AT10NS ,--`-- NUMITLH HLMUvt U • GASKETS � �T WEiDCOPF"; E3 O No ---- IF ._— Di)rou czRreY As n+E sPRNlcteA cGNTRAc7GR nuT wEwwG vnoc=_nuREs _----__ WITH THE REOUIREMENTS OF AT LEAST AWS 010A LEVEL AR AR-7 coMPLr OAF ll NO YyTyaNC OO YUU CERTIFY THAT THE WEU)ING WAS PERFORMED 8Y WELDERS DUALFIED N COMPLIANCE WITII THE REOUIREMFJ4TS OF AT LEAST AWS DIMS.LLVEI.M-] SES O NO DO YOU CERTIFY THAT WELDIN3 WAS CARRIED OUT N COMPLIANCE WON A OOCUMENTLD DUALITY OONTROL PROCEf7(JRE TO NSUHE THA'ALL DLSC:t ARE RETRIFVED,THAT OPENINCS N PPNG ARE SM(Y)n{,THAT SLAG ANOOTH-R WELDING RESIDUE ARE REMOVED,AND THAT THE INTERNAL DIAMETERS Dl PIPING ARE NOT PENETRATED _ ___ /EVES ONO CUTOUTS DO YOU CERTIrY THAT YOU HAVE A CONTROL FEATURE TO ENSURE THAT ALL (DISCS) CUTOUTS(DISCS)ARE RETRiEVEDT 6-,44 O NO DATA HYDRAULIC NAME PLATE PROVIDED F NO.E"LA N�— —�---� —'—"'-- NAMEPLATE O YES U NO DATE LEFT N SERVICE WfTH ALL CONTROL VALVES OPEN: REMARKS --9-- � NAYS OFSPRNKLER �— TESTS WITNESSED Br fIGN..NRE4 FOR PROPERTY OWNED TRLL — DATE .mil- FOR RINKLEfT TRACTOR _)CV-)E -� .____�.. _ /- GATE ADpITDNAL EXPLANATION ANO NOIT S• I SiA RACK FiRvrc R-1(A)(tont.). 1991 EdMw SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE -_ 13–67 U PNEUMATC O ELECTRIC O HYDRAI)LIC PwtllO Nx+F AVLSED O YES O NO _ C�eq ME Du1 SUPE RV15E0 OYES 0- DOES esVCt>r'E - fNOMTHEMNN1nL RP M100.')t'aF.tIp1E001:TROI81ATgW DLLUGE A -�( OYES OND PRFaCDON m IF NO.EXPLAIN VALVES ,O YES O NO - SZ'AZ`fi%IIRR' I �T XrMWTWA-- MAKE ,MOCU lUPERVWONLOSS ALARM ' MRATE VALVE RELEASE OPERAIERELEASf No YES mot d 1p PBI lIDE MV how&DNre1Pm*r p%m won cjwpp"aa IVOM VW no ji�i M �ION MO Ig1RP M W p{I(lA O1YR1�0Y��IMMYC IMM\41�YI��OM� TEST Owl be 1;pIi �pB M�lO P«"�S�^MI�" b P1r^Y MSN IKSCwoTKTN P jjjM&=L'/UEt0 40 MI IZ7 Wn)Y pBrun en/1NNdI/I Rap 'A IMA ral Ft/I!d 1.1/!p1 p t Wnl In N buy.T"p.w wn _- lud t Y nOne�l tylia Mw�n0 Y'oew4ur13nd nwMun Ik orwvl Mk•11�hAl II/I pcss0 1 1/L-Ik0.1 I!rj-N Aoun. AaPIPINGHNYDRROSTAIICAILV TESIEO AT,LQQ PDI FT)R_7„-HBRS. F NO.STATE REASOR/' —� DRY PPND PNEUMATICALLY TESTED O YES Q-w EOUPMENT OPERATES PROPERLY B/'�E1 .17 NO C�Tt�TI-NIf����GT�I� °��If�l�{�"�+. DERIVATIVES OF SODAIM SILICATE,BRINE.OR OTHER COARWIVE CHEMICALS WERE-NOT U4EO FOA TESTM SYSTEMS OR TE118 ST:IPPNG"31 O YES O NO OFUVN READNO OF GAGE LOCATED NEAR WATER RFSUUALPRi.SSUPI,V9M VALVE N TEST TElT SUPRYTEBTCONNECTION: -130 PSI CONIf,CTI(1NOPENY:'OE PSI U74ER(YIDUDU MANS ANO LEAD N CONNECTION$TO SYSTEM RISERS FLUSIEO BEFORE CON16CTKYI MADE i0 SPRNI'1LR PPeO. VERIFMEDBY(X)PYOF THE UFORN NO.IIB all-VIES DNo OTHER EXPLAIN FLUSHED BY VISTALLER OF U DER- GROUFIb SPRNKLFR PPNG 6-YETI O NO BUUMF(t - NlrilOi�iii Mov D —OASI(MTB WELDED ED P'^IND ONES ONO TO t'IX1(XRTF"AS THE SPRNIUR CONIRACTOI•,TMAT WELDING PROCCEILIRES COMPLY -- WITH Tv*REOLAREWNTS OF AT LEAST AWS 010.Ck LLVEL AA-3 04(4 O NO WELDING CCT YOII CER'fFY'+'HAT TK WELDING WAS PERFORWD SY WELDERS OVALe ED N COMPLIANCE WITH ITE RF0UtlOf.MENTSOFATIWT AWS OIJ•I,LEVELARO BMM(.S (T NO DO YOU CCRTFY T14A T WELDNG WAS CARRED OUT N COMPLWICE WIT14 A DOCUUf NTI DOUAL.TY CONTROL PROCETA1RE TO NSURE t)tAT A(1 DIS(:S ARE RE IREM.U,DO T OM N04M N PPMO ARE SMOOTH.MAT SLAG AND OTHER WELDING RESpCw ARE REMOVED.AILD THAT TIE INTERNAL DIAMETERS OF PPNGAAENOTPENETRATED r1rE5 ONO tJTCUTS DO YOU CERT"II UT YOU HAVE A CONTROL FEATURE TO ENSURE THAT ALL (Discs) )DISCS)ARE CUTOUTS)DISARE RETREYEDT sr+ts n NO HYTMUIUUC WYE MATE PROVIDED F NO E1CPlAM '----�'---^ DATA NAMIPLATT _ (1 YES 0 NO DATE LER N SERVICE WRH ALL CONTROL VALVES OPEN: REMARKS " Z`Z•94 (X7AIinictOR ----- -__ Il�R� �►�S. WLP•.�- oT _ TESTBIFRTNESSIEOBr — —_--- - 1ucNATUREa FOR ETITY MRE^ �LtEI)1 TIRE -- GATT -`'r/ `�r`�-j------ --�----- ---�----- - fORSPRNKLER ONTIUCTO �()HE IHLE RATE --. AOdtQNAI EXPLANATION AAn NOTE -- ISA DAU, `- -------- . Figure:4-1(I)(coup-J, 1991 Cdtbon 13-66 l)'IS'AUATION OF SPRINKLIER SYS•I'EMS CONTRACrows MATERIAL&TEST CERTIFICATE.FOH A605/EGF?QUNUPIPING PHOCEnURE `________ --------- n',I owm"b^al ro<l Mat«�bn Nn0 Mar a aq a rryOr IM — NNfNor bapr m vnKm s Pon~r a mn rK�urr�NNAI&I'd ;.e Few'Mew ow inkW to aR1V6 rW`AwyAA.F.An/da'h tAall M certir:yl Dnp A MW M AMONTT Ano� p « e rr Yl la wy pr j�dj "S"ry' williml C40'~GhM be ► a Wuw w0.r rd awww".E Y Wooma d na o+rwh np, PROPf RTI NAPE PLANS -_--- /tS1AI.lATKNN CONFUFWSTO ACCfJ'Ti3J I'IAi+S-- —`""' --- __ FCX PYQNT USED FS APPROVEIJ — �l�'FS n NO— F NO.EJJ%AN OLW.TNONS ' A" s n NO NAS PERS 9p aNN C:X--- - l4CAT_ _ ROEOFFWE EQIIPYENT/ N1 flu k;TCq V^T4baI'�-.-_ OF O.UX I A VµvES AND CAMECAME A14 MW EIMNCE OF OF Ti Pd lua v fOlMT1ENT7 - +"" �O NO K AD.EXPI�w INS TRUC T10NS NAM:COP6d OF T14 FU110WlrO/CEN LEFT ONTKp4NNSCS. --._ N dYSTEY COYP01&NTS POTRUCFGYS - ^. - O TLS ^ONO... a.CARE AND MA-EDTA NCE HSTRUCTK" n rl s ow) I NFPA 13A OYES ONO LOCATION n YES n NO OF SYSTEM SA'L'ES/LA.01o.n. ---'-------`---—._._..�._____--- YEAR OF _ � MODEL M -' MAAt,FA CTiXNE ORFICE T;YPEAA TUAE SIVE OUANUTY RATING SPRINKL FAS G!-a • -- ._ �_ P.PEAND TryFar� /y _ FITTINGS T!WaFilhpr_. - OLARM _ ALARM DE Vt YAXSAIIY TSNf TO OF+E AATC VAIN: --MAKEUnFlow YODEL YID UON,TEST CkMFtC110fa INDICATOREC. aar VALVE MAKE MSL _ O.OD. .� SERIAL Ml MAXf --- M(X)EL Sf IIAL NC. TWF TO TRP TIRCI TEST WATERTINE Will—LR oarllM CONwcTpN• ASI TRPPDNT 'A OPERATUNO — PITESSUIIE PT1Ed•om AIR PT/:SSUW. AcACNED OPERATEO TEST _ MN. SEC. PSI - - _ NEST OUTTFT PROPERLY •11AewA - Pdl PSI WIN SEC. rE! NO OOb. 'YE ASUIIEO FRGN TME NdPECTORS TEST 'F'1IDNd G1'ENEO. •-- --�.._ l(IGp) '►T/FTFD N LLSA• (OVE R) Fig" ' iPpl fNiidoR /isr INS r6CTIO(f -No!)(7g City of Tigard Building T%"rtarnjt 13125 8w Ball Blvd- Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Lina (Roc-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Ph ev 639-4171 Inspection: � Footing Plby. Underslab �. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Pound. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. San. 3ewor Frami -Bldg. Post/Beam Hoch. Rain Drain Insulation -Plamt Plbg. Underfloor Mater Lirr 1l 4 Gyp. Bd. -"or.h. Date Reque s 7te d: -- c ( —Time• PM Address: / Q��� !�_� - � Permit f:AIL- Builder: - )O GJ TREZ FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: 7- V Inspereor:- --� - - - - -/—�-- Dater_ _-APPROVED DISAPPROVED -" APPROVED SUBJRCT TO ABOVE _Call For Rainsp. ;NSpE�CTION MOTI y8 City of Tigard Building Departs Bet 1322s BW Hall elvd. Tigard, Oregor 97223 Inspection,/Line (Roc-O-phone) 659-4115 Business Phone: 639-417, Inaportionx 1l' Footing P1 . Onderslab Hoch. Rough-in A ` 9 ppc/Sdwlk Pound. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINALt Post/Seam struct. San. Bawer Framing -Bldg. Poet/Beam Hoch. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Mater Lina Oyp. Rd. -Meeh. Gate Requested`t/ Tines �! `___pN Pal M. it I nuildert_,�_ THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspector'-----��lL _� !� APPROVED — DTSAPPROVPfi APPROVFD SUBJECT TO 1jp0Vg Re i limp. INSPECTION NoTICE City of Tigard Building Department 13125 BW Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 In" tion Line (Rec hone): 639-4175 Business Phone: -4111 Inepoction:,_ _-__ 1 rooting Plbg. Underslab Nwh. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk round. Plbg. Top Out asL n_ FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing Bldg. Post/Beam Hoch. Rain Brain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Undertloor Hater Line ayp. Rd. -Hoch. i Date nequested:- ^—Time. x_hH r �^ PecmiG Addreso: // /w Builder:_G1 -SCl 2k --THE FOLLoHINO cow-rioNB ARE REQUIRED: Inapectorr Dato:�����/ /_ _--_�nOVSD DISAPPAUVRb APPROVED SUB.IFCT TO'ABOVE' - Call r'or Rminnp. INSPECT[ON NOTICE e4 47-<) City of riga.rd UUI]Lding Departnmt 1312S SW Ball Blod. Tigard, Oregon 972 3 Inspection Lina (Rec-0-.phone )s 639- 1175 Business h : 639--41:1 I nspert Footing Plbg. Under --•--• slab Hoch. Rough-in Appr/,dwlk Pound. Plbg. To out F Gas Line lINALs Pr-At/80-Am Struct. :'an. Sower Framing -B).dy. Post/Ream Hoch. Rain Drain Insulation _ply Plbg. Cndarflaor Water Line '- - J C7 -Koch. Date Requested, /4- , (- Tifist Address. j L— — r-�1 _ Permit Builders TRE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIREDs Inspector: / Data: / --L1*Vf'"0VFn DI.SAPPROVRD APPROVED SUBJECT TO AROVE _,- _Call For Rainap. jISPECTI0j4 NOT_CE city of Tigard Building Department 13125 RW Ball Blvd. Tigard, Or.»gon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone: 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspect ion: Footing plbg. llnAerelab Meth. Rough-in A Sr da`�, pp / k Pound. Pl.bg. Top Out Gas Line FINALS Post/Ream Struct. San. Sewer � -Bldg. Post/Beam !tech. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Ondorfloor (tater Line Gyp. Bd. -mech. Date Requested=__Z_LZ- —i Time: AM ply Address: .-5�— Permit 1:..L-..L���J_—..� Bu i Wor t THE FOLLOWING CORRRCTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspector: --�--�__ ---APPROVED —� DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE C\ll Por Reinsp. INSPTCTION NOTICE city or Tigard Building Departwent 13125 dw Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Roc-O-Phone)c 639-4175 Business Phones 639-4171 Inspections Tooting Plbg. Underslab Hach. Hough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbq. Top Out Gas Line FINALS Post./Beam Struct. San. Sewer Iraming --Bldg. Post/Beam Mach. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor. Nater Line Gyp. Rd. -Hoch. Date Requested:__ � __Times —Jul c ((3'j, Address s— � �'//L-^/I �. Permit f s Builders TRE FOI.I.ONIgG OORRECTIO14S ARE REQUIRRDt Inspoctor• Dates���L�` ! !/ _ APPROVED _ _ DISAPPROVED — APPROVF.O SUMTRrT TO ABOVE Call. For Reinsp. Construction Inspcetiorx& Related Tests ing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting Test P.O. Box 23814 September 19 , 1954 Tigard,Oregon 97281 94- 1566 Phone(503)684.3460 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FAX #684-0954 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: September 16 & 17 , 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS : Tigard, OF INSPECTOR: R. Brown #602 09-16-94 : CTI representative visi-ted site to perform reinspection of nort-compliance items . The results are as follows: 1) Nuts at column ancror bolts have been completed and accepted throughout the structure. 2) Per report 9/12/94 , Itern #3 : Column to cantilevered canopy beam A.325 bolts hove been corrected/completed and accepted. 09-17-94 : CTI representative visited site as requested and , inspected bolts at delivery area canopy. Loose bolts noted were tensioned while Inspector was present and canopy connections substantially conform to project specifications. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office . If further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contac*: thij office. Respectfully' submitted, WgsS/T G, I 11 1, ach RB/exp cc : Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. MSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department 1312S BO Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Roe-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection: Footing /1tP1 Pl��Undarsleb Mach. Ra _ n App nrd,.lk V Found. Plbg. Top Out Cas Lint FINAL: Post/Beam St-ruct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Mach. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Ussderfloor Nater Line nyp. Bd. --Koch. Date nequesteds ` Timor AK PN Address:_2tsv_c- l` � -� Pensit Builder: TRE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspector:�`� Dats:��-� DISAPPROVED --_ APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE - Call For Re.insp. — .....-.. i �N_SgFCTION NOTICF. �/�-+��� City of Tigard Building Deptvtaent 13125 BR Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Lino (Rec-0-Phone)t 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspections ? /_ A " Rooting P1 . Undernlab t'9 Hoch. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gan Line FINALt Post/Ream Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post./Beam Het.h. Rain Drstn Insulation -Plumb. Plbq. Underfloor NaterJI•i Gyp. Bd. -Moch. Date Requested: 1�--- --__Time: ---__ <LpH Addreast Q��iYYJJ I f� C` Pe ren it Buildert 24f- -M 4f-M FOLLONING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: �A,4 M1311L�_ ZZ 97 7`/ Inspector:—__--- Dates os -- APPROVED -� DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE Call For Reinsp. • IMSP CIIO i NOTIgE City of Tigvrrl Building Departs ent 13125 aw Ball Blvd- Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection: Footinq Plbg. Under:2 Meeh. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Pound. Plbg. Top Out Gan line r FINAL: Poet/Beam Strr:ct. San. Sewac ramie Bldq. Poet/Beam Me-h. Rain Dram Insulation -Plumb. Pl.bg. Underfloor Nater Lina Gyp. Rd. -Mach. ` _. _ Date Requested: ,l,i�: _ AM pM Address:� Permit Builder: z_ THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQU TaED: Inspector:__ — __! Dater --_APPROVED _` DISAPPROVED APPRCWFD SURJEC'T TO ABOVE Call For Reinsp. LNSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Bullding Departsent 13125 SW Ball Blvd_ Tigard. Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 6399-�41�755 Business Phone: 639--4171 Inspection:___�'�:(y�-,���_'I (►�Jd�t�—�~��a �/1 _� Footing Plbg. Underslab(/ Hoch. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk v Found. Plbg. Top Out Cas Line FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Praming -Bldg. Post/Beam Mech. Rein Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfioor Nater Line G t/ Gyp. Bd. -mech. Dtte Requesteds 2 � cJ �/ T Time: �____AN �•d21PM Address t! l J� „��/i' � Permit !i6 "_f y_iQ/ Builder: �/�_ TBE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS AM REQUIRED: Inspector: A^ ---- Dat.et f APPROVED D151kPP'_t0VED APPROVED SURJEC'1' TO ABOVE r.al l pr,r Rrinan. psunioN N01ICE City of Tigard Building Departaant 13123 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, oregoin --- Inspect:io Line (Rec-o-Phone)t 639-4175 ugtnsss Phones 639-r—MV, Inspection: - — - - Footing Underslab Mach. u h-in App��trblr! _R3i4" 7 Cas Line FINALt 'Found. Post/Beam struct. Sen. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Ream mech. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Water Line Gyp. Bd. -Mach. Ll Date Requested _ Time: AM ��pM Add-rews:� y�'1 ' `��■ - Permit i �.— l�Builder.:- ---- — ��_-- THE 9OLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARS REQUIRED: Inspector:_, he tor:--/ / __,_ _----- Date!_ / C_^ APPROVED -_-- DISAPPR1 APPROVED SLB•?RCT TO ABOVE. ellI' For R.einsp. �NS�E<.:1'ION NOTICiS city of Tigard Building DePart-- t 13125 gW ',Ha11 Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 9727.3 InepectI" Ilns- (Rac_C.--Phone): 639-4115 Duelneea Phonsa 639-4111 Inspection:__.. - / Footing Plby. Underslab (Hach. Rough-i appr/Sdwlk Found. Pltwt. Top Out asi Lrns� PINALs Post/Seam Struct. Sen. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Rech. Rain Drain Insulatlon -Plumb. Plbq. UnderfloorQ Nate(r/�L1ine Gyp. Rd. -Neth' Date Re Iuested:-/ 1_� _/Tame: _ AN Addroes: - / -----5"v �� -- Builderk THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE ,"QU I M0 s Inspector — Yj - batr -! , - e_�ROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE Cell For neinep. ,CITY CSF TIGARD ✓ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MECHANICAL 13126 3W Hall 8tvd.Tigard,Oregon 97223*81 Op (503)6304171 PE RM IT PERMIT #. . . . . . . : MEC94•--0001 639-4171 DATE ISSUED: 09/13/94 PARCEL: 1 S 136CD--0c200 :,ITE ADDRESS. . . : 07855 SW DARTMOUTH ST SUBDIVISION. . . . ZONINGt BLOCK. . . . . . . . . . LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . : ----------------------------- C LASS OF WORK. . :NEW FLOOR FURN. . . . s EVAP CQOLER s TYPE OF USE. . . . eCOM HNI T #EATERS. . :3 VENT FANS. . . OCCUPANCY GRP. . :B2 VENTS W/O ADPL: VENT SYSTEMS; 1i' �]T'ORIEiS. . . . . . . . : 1 B(JILEI'S/COMPRESSORS HOODS. . . . . . . : FUEL TYPES----------- —-- 0-3 HF'. . . . :4 DOMES. i NC I N: : /GAS/EL-E/ / 3-15 HP. . . . : 10 COMML. INCIN: MAX INPUT: BTU 15--341 HP. . . . : REPAIR UNITS.- 14 F IRE=. DAMPERS?. . : 30-51Z, HP. . . . : WOODSTOVES. . : GAS PRESSURE. . . : 504 HP. . . . : CLO DPYE'RS. . : NO. OF lJN I TS-- -- --- --- AIR HANDLING UNITS OTHER UNITS. :3 r URN ( 100K STU: (-= 10000 cfm : GAS OUTLETS. - 17 F UHN )=100K BTU: > 10000 cf i. Remark`s : Costco `3t ore— new retail, tar-i 1. 1.ding 1-reit treat ers= r�adi.ant heater a, repair'• irk ! ts= mutts, other, units= ovens Owner': - ___..______._--.__.__ _._..-----._—__.__._______.____.___—•---_____-_-. -EES -_ --•__.._._.._..__. MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP type amount by date reacpt 12200 NORTHRUP WAY PRMT $ 347. 50 JG 06/2:8/94 •-• PLCK $ 66. 88 JG 06/28/94 — BEL.LEVUE WA 98005 5PCT• t 17. 38 JG 06/r8/r)4 - F-'hone #: 206-8c31---7600 Contract or- _ _---—_—_------------------------ At",Ez.R I CAN HEATING, INC. 1339 SE GIDEON F;URTLraND OR 972,0 Phone #; 239-4600 4c 1.. 76 TOTAL R-g #,. . 331.35 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS P reit is issued subiect to the regulations contained in the Gas Line Insp Tigard Municipal Cede, ',tate of Ore. Specialty Cade! and all other Mechanical Insp applicable laws. Ali work will he done in accordance with Heating Unt Insp approved plans. This pereit will expire if work is not started Cooling Unt Insp _ within lK days of issuance, or if work is suspended for store Duct: Inspect i.on _ than 180 days. Mi sc. Inspection / Final Inspection — f ':P m i t t e e :3 i.gnat 1-1!-e : 1 i I s s a a c' Cal for inspection — 639-4175 City of Tigard MECHANICAL PERMIT Planck/Rec. # 13125 sw Hall Blvd. APPLICATION Permit # MA- '0061 _ Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 c b Table 3A Mechanical Crx1A 07 PRICE= AMT Job t L��� ��le/ 1) Pennell-W -- -�— _ , 40-- 10.00 r Address 2) Supplemental Perron 3.Ou --- timate — fr td./ co_-,j e- 1) incl.duds R vents 6.00 ' - i Aj+ — -- Owner !20 ^_�1l 21 incl.ducts Il vents 7.50 -"7R" or umance— - i('04 r rl 04 Q 00 0-1 3) ;ncl.vent 6.00 ape—FvJ0 hea er,w safer _ ClC �u 4) or Ik*r mounted hxrtef y�ie 6.00 c'-' Occupant �enT�iho7 ink in—�'-__ 3— - 5) appliance permit 3.00 rilhoeTing,r � -- 6) 000ling,abr„.•,pbon unit 6.00 �errr- r or or Damp, xta pump,ar" rte- - r I r ry 7 7) to 3 HP absorp unit to 160K BTU 6.00 77 -10,ar or comp,Foa pum-T-p,ari co . Contractor 3 J t r�Poin 8) 3-15 HP absorp unit to 500K BTI.' l U 11.00 p 11boiler or comp, -Eirmp,air conct — v�P� Op r� � 9) 15-30 HP absoap unit.5.1 mil BTU 15.00 Bailor or comp, 61 pump,air cond. ?, ) 10) 30-50 HP absorp unit 1-1.75 mil BTU 2250 her Ty ac ow a have re re ica an, al Iva i er or comp, a airpump,aco . -- informet an given is a rrecy,that I am the owner or authoired agent 11) s 50 HP abaorp unit 1.75 mil BTU 31.50 of the owner,that plans submitted are In �ompiance with Stall Air an w-V urn —" I laws,that I am registered with the Constiuction Contractor's Board. 12) 10,000 CFM 4.50 that the number giverh is correct. (If exampt from Stole registration, r handing uru pkmso give reason below.) 13) 10,000 CTM+ 7.50 Non p —_-._—_- _- — _-- _— -`----- 141 evaporate cooler 4.50 Vent an connect.4d —' 15) to a single dud 3.00 Ventilation sys sm 16) included in appliance permit `a, 4.50 Sy cc, Hood served 17) mechanical exhaust 4.50 w new 0--addition _ a n(T reP-6 mmercia v(WMs-i'T- - — to be cksre resWntai,O0non-residential A 19) type irr.fropratEir 3000 -xis ng use -"--- 1 9r-ie,woo�Tove_ water`b 7 19 building or property Y ) heat9i,alar,dothes dryers`on_. 4.50 Proposed use of 20) Gas piping one to Twin whets '� 200 �� huil ling or pmp" - _ _ 21) More than 4-per outlel Type of fuel-of 0 natural gas LPG 0 electric 49 y lj/r�� PERMITS BECOME VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCT1c.NJ Minimum Fee=25.00 SUBTOTAL $7, -- -•— AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENt;FD WITHIN 180 DAYS,OR 5%SURCHARGE IF CONSTnUC'TION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR — -•-- f�' ABANDONED FOR A PERK)D OF 190 DAYS AT ANY TIME FLAW REVIF-W 25%OF SUBTOTAL AFTER WORK IS COMMF14CED. TOTAL 11 >%dal Cmditinor Date issued by rarsoirrrtrr CI TY OF TIGARD - RECEIPT OF PAYMENI WuFl-l-,l No. 194-P-5f,667 CHECK AMOUNT a 451. 7b AME RICAN HEI-iTING CAW1 AMLIONT 1 0. OLA W)DRF�ss a 1339 BF GIOLON STULL I I-`AYMLNI DI41+ a 09/13/94 I-j,l.IBD I V I S I ON PORTLAND, ORROON 4 IP-02- 14-IRPOSE OF' PAYMENT AMOLIN I PAI L) PUHPOSE LIF AMOLINI 1441 D 347, FALI 11. 1.) V+-.R 1 ?. 38 ML(J-1111VICAL PIE MEC44-000'1 -.50 q p 1,1.011\1 CHECK FE 136. 88 (10141TCO 111 101 AM( ll,INT POID 451. 76 C'misti-m-tion Inspection& Relatcd lllests Carlson Testing, Inc. Greotechilical C�01,9ultinu P.O. Box 23814 September 1 3 ; 1994 Tigard, Oregon 97281 94 1566 Phone(503)684-3460 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FAX x684.0954 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DA'L'ES COVERED: September 12, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS : Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: R. Brown #602 09- 12-94 : CTI representative visited site as requested and observed the following: 1) Roof joist bolts appear to have been compl (,ted and are accepted. 2) Beam to column A325 bolts on Grid J/1-11 have been tightened and are accepted. 3) A325 bolts at Grid P,/10 . 1 , 11 . 3 and 11 . 7 . Detail. P-6 . Bolts are loose at cantilevered team to column connections. 4) Bolts at garden and tire shop are incomplete at column bases and cross bracings. 5) Nuts are still incomplete at column bases at many locations . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected c,.zly. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, exceptin full without prior authorization from this office . If. further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, rAR S 1�1/ STI INC. ri PB/ las Leach iden cp cc : Price Cost,-o c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. INS PCC IQM nOT1CB City of Tigard Building Deprirtment 131_25 811 Ball Ilvd_ Tigard, O"gon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phona)s 639-4175 Business Phones 639-4171 Inspect ion s — C Footing Plbg. Dndarslah mech. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk CA Pound. Plhq. Top Out Cae Li OAIV lINAL Poet/Beam 9truct. van. Sewer '�reminq s -Bldg. Post/Been Mach. Rain Drain Insulation Plumb. Plbg. Dnderf1jew Nater Line Oyp. 8� (f/���ZG N s Data Raquee]stt(e�d`s �. ) � __-Time: _ AN PN/ Addreses L- Permit # � C f -fid 1 THE !'OmaWINO OORRNCiIONB ARL P.R()DIRRDs Inspnctors -- -� -- Date s_2 /.-3____p AT PROVED DIBAPPROVkD APPROVED BUILTICr TO ABOV2 Call For Rei-nap. jNl4P:dCTIU(1 N(YTIcz / Cit? of. Tlga,d buildl.aq pepartaeot. 13125 SB Bell B;.ed. Tigard, orsgon 9722 Inspection Line (Roc-o-Phone): 639.4175 Ausiness P 39-4171 Inspoction:_ — l ------ Tooting Plbg. Underelab Mach. Rough-in Appr/Sdw1k Pound. Top Out J Gas Line PINALs Post/Beam Strutt. San. Sower Framing Oldg. Post/Beam Hoch. Rain Drain insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater .'Ane Gyp. B3. -Hoch. Data Requseted:__.___i 1 _X_AM PK T�A7Address: l Builder: _ J / _J c� THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspe^to Date: ( �l -f , - APPR OVED DDISAPPROVED APPROVED BUR IIS TO 11BOVF Call For Reinsp. OL%',i T l�`�;�-�'�", ✓�-t��/l. -. T ��� INBpECTION,L S Citi of Tigard Rull.ding nepa�� � 1312S :I* Hall Blvd_ Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 9-4175 usines■ Phone: 63 - 1 Inspect lons�. Footing Plbg. Underslab Mach. Rough-in Appr/Bdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Gas Line FINAL: Pont/RRam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Poet/Ream Mach. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line / Gyp. Bd. -Mech. Data Ragve-sl/tedeC C l Times ,L AN PM Address: // J J <C� B c Permit Builder: TRF FOLLOWING OORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRP.D: ------ - Inspector: Data: _ ihPPROVED DISAPPROVED _ APPROVED SUBJR TO ABOVE/ ___Call For Reinap. (..-�o11structiotl hlflPectioti & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc• Geotechnical Consulting September 8 , 1994 P.O. Bcx 23814 94--2050 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX 0 684-0954 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: September. 7 , 1994 PROJECT: Pacific Corporate Center Bldg #241 ADDRESS : Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H. P. Murphy 09-07--94: CTI representative verified progress installation of rebar (size and placement) for retaining wall and rear of building on "A" Line between Grids 4 and 7 with returns inward. Installation is per Detail 11/S4 . 2 . Installation is complete on wall (both front and rear mats) on 7 Line, from A to D. Installers are presently working on verticals (both front and rear) of back wall . Corner bars are in place and rebar from footings have matching bars up to 1/2 height. All work , etc . appears to be per plans and specifications . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced . except. in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . Respectfull�.' sul%pitted, CARLSON TESTING, IN DoRs Leach President HPM/ecp cc : Pacific Realty Associates LP (Pactrust) City of Tigard Mackenzie/Saito & Associates Baugh Construction Co. INS MqT ION NOTI!,p City of Tigard Building Depat,,ent X125 S1t1 Ball 811111. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inepection Line (ROL-4)._Phone): 63 -4175 Rueinees Phones 639 7 Inepeet}.one [tooting -- ----------- - Plbg. Underelab Mech. Rouqh-in pound. Appr/Sdwlk Plbg. Top Out Gas Line PINALs Poet/Bcaam St.rvek. San. Sewer__ Framing -Bldg. Poet/Swam Mach. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb, Plbq. Underfloor Nater Line I Gyp. Rd. -Beth. Date Regueoted: __26-2�j1J. _ Addcsess __Time i AN PM Permit #I v sv Builder:. TRE FOI.LOHINO ODRRRCI'IONS ARE REQUIRED: _ Inspectors —% ------- ------_— _�___-- Dates- -_ APPROVEb DISAPPROV,•D APPROVEI) SUBJECT TO ABOVE .__Call FO:' R"tnstp. Construction Inspection& Relilted'Iests Carlson Testing, Inc. GeotechnicalConrultinR P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-34EO FAX 0 6A4-0954 September 1 , 1994 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: August 31 , 1994 PROJECT: CjsIco Tigard Store ADDRESS : Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H. P . Murphy 08-31-94 : CTI representative verified depth of holes for embedment (minimum 6 5/8" ) and cleanliness to epoxy #6 r, bar pa.eces into existing footings for front columns . All were clean and were at leGst 6 5/8" deep (7-8" ) . CTI rep�"esentative observed filling of holes with Hilti C100 epoxy and setting of rebar dowels inserted to full depth while twisting - epoxy oozing out. Columns #: C+10/0 . 75 ; B+ 16/0 . 75 ; plinth corner at A. 5/0 . 75 ; A+14/0 . 75 ; and A/1 . All work done to good workman standards . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full , without prior authorization from this office. If further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON' TESTING, C. fi c. w Douglas W. Leach President HPM/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. JNUECPION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department 13125 SW ,,R11 Alryl_ Tigard, Cregpn 97223 Ineppcti.on Line (Rec-G Pi,,)"):,: 639--14�17---5��Business Phone _9 111 Inspection: Footing Plbg. Underslab Hoch. Rough--in Appr/ wlk / round. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL: / Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Hach. Rain Drain Insulation _ply Plbg. Underfloor Neter Line Gyp. Rd.— -Hoch. �� � _ - r Date Requested: - Timet � i ui pN Address: n .Permit: #10- t U I Builder: THE POLIA1NINc1 CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspect-r:---- --� ._.-_ ---�-- --_.— — _ Date:_ APPROVED _-_ Date.- APPROVED SUBJECT TO A90Vt Cal] Por Reinsp. rr. TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE o: RESCUE AND BEAVERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive• P.O. Box 4755 • Beaverton, OR 97076• (503) 526-2169• FAX 526-2518 August 31, 1994 Fire Systems West Attn: Chuck 600 S.E. Maritime Avenue, Suite 300 Vancouver, Washington 98661 Re: Costco 7855 S.W. Dartmouth 609OA-164-000 Dear Chuck: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and .is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Up.iform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other 1ccal ordinances and regulations. Automatic sprinkler plans for, the above captioned project are conditionally approved, subject to the following items: Plans may be picked up from the City of Tigard Building Dapart.ment. This office would advise giving the City Building Department a c,ill prior to making a special trip for pick up to assure pans have been transferred to their office. Contact person is Jerry. 1 . Please provide engineering documentation either from the truss manufacturer or a registered structural engineer, showing that detail 4/3 on sheet 1 of 6 is an acceptable method of handing and providing earthquake bracing for automatic spri-lkler piping from the truss systems that are being utilized within this structure. 2 . Flow test data, as shown on page 1 of 6, and hydraulic calculations do not agree with fire district 's flow test data for this area. This does not necessarily mean that the flow test data used is incorrect as "Work/nir"Smoke Detectors Sege Lives r C Fire Systems West Attn: Chuck August 31., 1994 Page 2 municipal piping systems for the Dartmouth Street area are changing on a rogular basis, thus improving water supp'v. Upon evaluating the two fLows, the flew data that t'r.re Systems West provided versus the flow data information the fire department has on file, all s1stems, as designed, will function 7roperly with either flow test. Conclusion - no further art:ioi. needs to he taken on this item. This item was included in this letter for reference only. 3 . As systems are completed, this office shall make inspections of nver .liead installed piping and underground insk-alled piping. Inspectif-.n re juests shall be made formally through City of Tigard Building Department utilising their recording system and building permit numbering system. 4 . A.ftsr completion of said systems, contractor's material and test certificate shall be completed' and a copy submitted to this office for pP.rman(---it filing. Approval of submitted plans is not an approval of omissions Gr oversights by this office or of nc::-compliance with any applicable requlat.io?js of local government . rf I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to cont.;ct m� at 526-2502 . Sincerel , ' G e B irchil-1 DFM Pi )s F,xami.nej.- CB:kw / Cu: City of Tigard Building Department " Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carbon. Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Cossulting REPORT OF6X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS— P.O. Box 2:1814 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: --- — _ Phone(503)634-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: 08/31 , 19 94 Job No. 94_.1566 Permit No: Client: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: r_OSTCO TIGARD STORE �A—� -------- --- TIGARD OR Address: ------ --- — ----R081NSON CONSTRUCTION - cub Contractor: Contractor: _v__�—_---_—_--- --- LONE STAR NORTHWESTc-.t 224964 Concrete Supplier. _� —___.Truck No. _—� Ticket No.H .P . MURPHY Cu.Yds. tO/40 ^Load Not/4 Cast By: — �^ SUNNY 85 r Weather: —_ —_ — _Temp.High: Temp.Low: FREEZER PIT TOPPING SLAB Locatlon of Placement: — -- -----..-- --_— -- __- _ 1 :45 ib ---- --_--_—_�.__— _Test Timor _—.__—__Concrete Temp: —_—_ - 3000 28 4 1/2" 1 3!rength Requirement: -- PSI 0 ---- - - days Slump Cement Type 225 3/4 ', Mix NoJNo.Sacks — ---Alr Content ----- - Max.Aggregr.te -_---_. _—_---- Admix.Amount: Brand: _______— -Admix.Amount: ____�. _ —Brand: - — Set Yesto I Register Date Date Total Area v Unit Report Tested iNo. Days Number _ Rec_d Test _Load PSI No. By 7 6986 0`;/07 09/07 73,070 28.37 2580 67 JB 7 6986 09/07 09/07 74,296 28.37 2.620 67 JB 28 6986 09/07 09/28 106,290 28.33 3750 69 JB 28 6986 09/07 09/28 105,540 28.33 3730 69 JB cc :CITY OF TIGARD , Pemarks: ---- Ftfit ;ttM f`Bh `Rt1� Infrn oration crw"Inad hor%ln Is not to be renroducer:.except In full,without prior authorization Pom this office. Carlson hosting Inc. Construction Insnectior: Fi Related Tests Testing, Geotechnical Consulting FlEPORT0F6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 Test Methods: ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 _ Ttgard,,O�gon8 9711 1 AX i rR4-0954 Date Molded: ___ 08/37._ 19 94 'lob No. 94-1566 _ Permit No: Client: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP ---- Protect: --------------- C7STCO TIGARD STORE — __— TIGARD OR Address: — ------- ---------- - - ------- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: Sub Contractcr. -- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 66 2249b4 Concrete Supplier. ---Truck No. _Ticket No. H .P . MURPHY 10/40 2/4 �;ast 8y: --- � Load No. .— SUNNI85 57 Weather: _ Temp.High: Temp.Low: FREEZER PIT TOPPING SLAB Location of Placement: -- 1 :45 76 Test Time: — ___— Concrete temp: _ 3000 28 4 1 /2" I St,.,ngth Requirement: --- PSI O days Slump ______--Cement Type 225 �Ilx No./No. Sacks Air Content -- Max.Aggregate ---�_ AdMil r Amount: Brand: —Admix.Amount: -Brand: --- Set Test rlegister Date Date Total Area Unit Re ort Tested '10. Days Number Recd Test Load PSI No. By 7 6986 09/0:' 09/07 73,070 28.37 2580 67 JB 7 6966 09/07 09/07 74,296 28.37 2620 67 JB 28 6986 09/07 09/28 28 6986 09/07 09/28 ci: :CITY OF TIGARD , Remarks: _ Infmwwhlnn rAwvt tf herein Is not to be reproduced.except in full.without vrior authorizatlon from this office. r " 1!S GTION NOT CE city or TJ.gar-i Building Departisent 1312S RN Bali Bled. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (R�hpne): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspections FootingPltl. Underslab +4ech. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Cas Line FINALS PostjReam Struct. San. Bower wraming -Bldg. Post/Beam Hoch. R41fn-Drai9 Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line c, (/ Gyp. Bd. -Hoch. Date Requasteds_ �G —AN PH Addreas:—� S.� �ZlaI�mjp iI �Permit '_L�i e� —of , Buildersi�_ TRE FOLLONING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: --- -----— Inspector: Date: APPROVED �— DISAPPROVED -- APPROVED SoRJRf_R' TO ABOVE Call For Reirsp. I JNSPFC!ON NOTA / i City of Tigard n+:lldinq DepartA.%,t. 13125 SO Nall Blvd_ Tlgvrd, Oregon 97223 Inspection Lina (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4115 Business Phones 639-4171 Foot inq Plbq. Underelib Mach. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Pnund. Plbq. Top Out alas Una lINAL: Pos:/Beam dtruct. San. sewer ` lr.Q J -Bldg. Poet/Beset Mech. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Mg. Underfloor WaterLineGyp. Rd. -Mach. Date Requested, PM �l � -` G �1� Timet AN Address- L405L.) ��IT� Permit C �ermlt #, Bullderi_— THE !'OLLOMINo CORRECTIONS ARE REQ"TRISDt � Inspector: �V/`L _�_ g- i Dates AP4,ROJRD DISAPPROVED APPROVED SOBJE."T To ABOVE For Reinnp. ��ecrION v�orlcg ' City of Tigard lbslldlnq Depaitasmt 13125 BO Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Busineas Phone: 639-4171 InspectI L�.�'�.V_) Footing Plbg. Underslab Mach. Rough-1n Apps/Sdw1k Found. Plbq. Top Out Gas Line FINAL: Post/lea..a Struct. Ban. •owe! Framin -81dg. Post/Seem Mech. �Ilaie Drain • '/ s at o� Y-Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Une Gyp. Rd. h. Date Requested[ 1 ---Times SAM _ pM 1►dd..esat /'��� .� �cX"` eo Permit is r Lpi q zarg Builders CI�r (� �-�A TNR FOLLCri17NG CnRRECTIONS ARY RRQUIRF.D: Inspector: � _ — nates APPROVEn _ DISAPPROVRD APPROVRn SUBJRCT To AROVR �_Cals. For Reinsp. Construction Inspection& Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotcchnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oreqon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 F 4X 8 684.0954 August 22 , 3.994 94- 1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: August 2.2, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS : Tigard, OR INSPECTOR : H. P. Murphy 08-22-94 : CTI representative verified size and placement of welded w.iic� fabric reinforcement for mezzanine decks . All appeat.s -o be per plans and specifications . CTI representa~ive also obtained sample and took ce:perature and slump and cast ine set of (4) 6x.12 test cylinde -s of pour , approximately 20 yards . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspe:ted only . Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full , without prior authorization from this office . If further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . Respectfully sub pitted, CA So E TI INC. �rU , I -N D i las W. each P - ident v HPM/ecp cc : Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. Con. ruc ttu»t Inspection & Related T�•sts Carls®n Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 on 97281 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/'C31/C39 hone(503g684-346 Test Methods: _ Phone(503)6N4-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: 08/22 , 19 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP -_ Client: -- ------- Project: - COSTCO TIGARD STORE - - — - -------- ---- T I GARD OR Address: -- ROB I14SON CONSTRUCTION Sub Contractor _ __— --- - — Contractor: -— -- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 103 ':14577 Concrete Supplier: -_Truck No. _ ____ --Ticket No. H.P . MURPHY 10/20 Load No.l Cast By: � -Cu.Yds. -� '—�-- ---- SUNN�Y— lit r Weather. _--- - -----_._.__Temp.High: - MEZZANINE DECKS _ Location of Placement: 7 15 7 5 Test Time: — ------ ----Concrete Temp: - '30-00 _- - - t3 4 1/2 ,,. 3 ,,...._....�......r, Strength Requirement: --- - - — P31 • -days SHmp --- —Cement type - �2 Mix No./Nc Sacks -- ---- 6 - Air Content - Max.Aggregate _ Admix,Amount: —__ _. Brand: _--_._Admix.'+mount: _Brand: — -- Set Test® F'egister Date Date Total Area Unit Repport rested No. Days Number Rec'd Test Load — - PSI No. —By - 7 6797 0812:3 08/2 71,685 .7.8.30 2530 62 JB 7 6797 08/2.3 0612 70,532 28.30 2490 62 JB 2Ei 6797 08/'23 04/1 . -- 28 6797 08/23 09/1 r:c::CITY OF TIGARD Romarks: - - r,..,.tea....,.,„.f.inaet humin to nnr M ho ranmrlurarl mternt In full.withrn tt nrior authorization from this office. Construction hmpectiun &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geoteriinical Consulting REPC)R__TQF6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.G. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 97281 1'est Methods: _ __._.—_ Phone(503i'684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: 08/22 _ 19 94— Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: Client: PRIG L COSTCO C/O MULVPkNNY PARTNERSHIP Project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Address: R09INSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor. _ Sub Contractor: LONE STAR NOPTHWEST 103 234577 Concrete Supplier. — - Truck No. _. __--Ticket No. H .P . MURPHY 10/20 1/2 Cast By __— Cu.Yds. Load No.SUNNY 78 78 54 Weather: ____Temp.High: Low: - -- --- MEZZANINE DECKS Location ct Placement: v— — - - ----------- 7: 15 75 Tea:Time: _ Concrete Temp: _ -------- 28 4 112 ' I Strength Requirement: _. _ ——PSI 0 _-da): Slump ____Cement Type 226 3/4" Mix NoJNo.Sacks ----Air Content — ---•14ax.Aggregate Admix.Amount _ Brand: Aum,x.Amount: ---Brand: Set Test® Register Date Date Total I Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load -PSI o_ By — _ 7 6797 08/23 08/2 71,685 28.30 2530 62 JB - 7 6797 08/23 08/2 70,532 28.30 2490 62 JB 28 W6797 08/23 09/1 98,005 28 ,33 3460 68 JB 28 6797 08!23 09/1 99636 28.33 3520 68 JB ::�c:CITY OF TIGARD ' Romatic�: ----�J SONS 1 Ptic 1,.L..m..N.v ,.....wl..ari h—l"is not ho rah v4t waii arrant in rn11 milli inid nrinr Ai lthnrOntinn rmm thin ntflr:R. INSPECTION NOTICE City Of Tigard Pailding f�npactment .13125 SW gall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97 2 Inspection Linc (Rec-0-Phone): 63,9,-4175 BUslnese ph e: 9-4171 Inspection: Footing Plbg. Underclab XSch. Rough-in API`/�-- 4dw)k— T_ Found. Plbg. Top Out Cas Line FINAL: POWBeam Btruct. � Framing --Bldg. Post/Beam Mach. Rain Draln Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Mater Line / Gyp. Bd. -Hoch. Date Requeatede Tlme: Address:-_1 �. � �-•/ — Permit Builders TAE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspector -�- --- _ Dates—fJ �/ Lc, —_APPROVLrO DISAPPROVED _ APPROVED SUB.,:! Tr,, P. BOV,. Pyr Reinsp. iMSPECPION NOTICE City of Tigard .wiildiag Bepartsent 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Lina (Rec-O-phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639..4171 inspection: Footing Plbg. Underslab Mach. Rough-in 11PP r/Sdwlk Fcnind. Mg. Top Out Oas Lina FIK!►L: 1 Poet/Beam Struat. •an. emMa Framing -Bld Q• Post/Beam Hoch. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line (;'-P- i� (;'-P- Bd. -Meeh. -�- +--F--F- Data Rdyuested:�- 1 Time: Addressi _pM Builder:_— THE FOIJAM NC COP"c-T'IONS Agff RLQUIRRD: — } - In" �ctortz. --- Date: PRO iED _ DISRPPROVRD APPRONISD SUBJRC'f TO AROVE G ___—Call For Reinsp. Construction Luq)ection & Related"I gists Carlson Testing, Inc• Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 'hone(503)684-3460 August 11, 1994 FAX#684-0954 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATE:. COVPMED: August 10, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: R. Brown #602 & B. Scott $619 08-10-.94 : CTI representative visited site and observed the following: 1) Tens.ion testing of A325 bolts was performed using a Skidmore- Wilhelm tension gauge. ( I ' and 3/4" dialleter) The 3/4" diameter bolts were checked at the 375 ft/lbs used by the erectors in lieu of the turn-of-nnt method as specified by Varco-Pruden. These bolts were tested without hard washers to simulate the as-built conditions. Three of this diameter were tested at this torque and tensions averaged 41 kips . The AISC minimums specified at 28 kips . The three 1" diameter bolts tested using the turn-of-nut method found the average tension to exceed the AISC minimum roqu.irements. The average tension was 68 kips. 2 ) Witnessed the turn-of-nut method of tensioning on 1" diameter A325 bolts at column to roof beam haunch connections. Theso bolts have been tightened with an impact wrench. The iron workers are looseining these bolts and retightening using the turn-of-nut method. 3) CTI representative observed turn-of-nut method at Grid D/1 on I " diameter A325 bolts at haunch connection. No others completed at this time. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected ozd1;; . Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If further questions regarding this matter, pl.^ase do not hesitate to cont<<ct this office. Respectfully submitted, CARi,SON TESTIN C. Douc3las _T. Leach President BS/RB/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. -- --------- - � r�E L"I-i A N I C AL M CITY CSF TIGARD F'E-iimi r � PERMIT #. . . . . . . : ME:C94 0i=:i_W COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DfiW1fl-TJW T DATE 19SlJED* s 0A/10/94 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 07223.6104 (533)639.4171 PARCEL: 1S136CD--02200 311'E ADDRESS. . . : 07655 3W DARTMOUTH ST' SUBDIVIS1014. . . . : ZONING: BLOC:K. . . . . . . . . . . LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . : CLASS OF WORN.. . :NEW FLOOR FURN. . . . : EVAP COOLERS t 2 TYPE OF USE. . . . -COM UNIT HEATERS. . : V 7.N'I- PANS. . . OCCUPANCY GRP. . :[1;:_ VENTS W/O ADPL: VENT SYSTEMS. STORIES. . . . . . . . : 1 BOILERS/COMPRESSORS HOODS. . . . . . . : FUEL T`/PFS--_---- ---- 0-3 HP. . . . : DOMES. INCIN: : /GAS/ELF/ / 3-15 HP. . . . : COMML. INCIN: MAX INPUTS BTU 15-30 HP. . . . : REPAIR UNITS FIRE DAMPERS?. . .- 30- 50 HP— . - WOODSTOVES. . : GAS PRESSURE. . . : 50+ HP. . . . : CLO DPYERS. . - NO. OF UNITS– -- – ---- A I n HANDLING i- 4I TG OTHER UNITS. - 10 FURN ( 100K RTU: <= 10000 cfm: GAS OUTLETS. FURN ) =100K RTU: ) 10000 uFm : Wema)-' : Costco Chore new retail hiailding r•ef'r•igeration, cooler,,. ft,eezer�s, An ( 3ndensors Owner: – FEES MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP type amoi.)nt by date r-ecFit; 12200 NORTHRUP WAY PRM"f' 4 64. 00 SW 08/10/94 - PLCK $ 16. 00 SW 08/10/94 - BELLEVUF WA 98005 5PCT $ 3. 20 SW 08/10/94 r'hone #: 206-881• 500 Contractor: SHEPLER REFRIGERATION, INC. PO BOX 12146 PORTLPND OR 97L12 Phone #- 4 83. 20 TOTAL Reg # . : 6284:3 - --- REQUIRED INSPECTIONS – -- – This pirrit is issued suLject to the regulat.ons contained in the Misc. Insper_tion Tigard Municipal Code, State of Ore. Specialty Codes and a)' other Misc. Inspection appl icable lams. Al I work wi l l i.e done in accordance with Final Ins pert i on approved plans. This permit will expire if work is not started w thin 180 days J issuance, or if work is suspended for more than 180 days. Permittee. Signature: —�y - -->��='� Call for- inspection – 639-4175 l:1 J Y (IF" I'I GARD -- REr'C.ET.11:' -F':` 1 OFy F'AYM1:N'1 Rk: + I PT Nt 1. t 94 ►`�:t, C;HES-1e. OMUIIN'f NOW: RF F R I f3k`-,RA 1 MN CASH AMON:Y a k). 00 F1TiE.OK c0i3 t F ia`!M1 IV 1 U1ITF. s VIN/!.flli�►�� SURDtV CSIDN e Vii I11PI: W OF PAYMFNT WMt UN I PA 11) PIRPUsE OF PAYMF N'T 1-Hvt(.ILJN f Pt.111) h1t i HNNtf..' 4 Ill; ':3 64. 0V,' al. BUILD PEN ;3• �:� P1 (-AN CAVITN' F'i. !C ChM -/jk w SW 1MR 113141"Al 111 ST. /(,W)',1 0 1 1 11I.. AMUCIN 1 PAID — ) 83. ,11,0 Construction Inspection Lac Related Testes Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX #684-0954 August 9, 1994 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001. FIELD ?NSPECTION REPORT DA'Z'ES COVERED: August 8, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: R. Brown #602 08-08-94: CTI representative visited site and reviewed structural prints and specifications . A325-N bolts at roof beams and columns were tested with a calibrated torque wrench at 375 ft!lbs to verify bolt tightness . Grid F/1-12 . ( 3/4 " diameter only. ) Bolts were found to be acceptable. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, C l 7STI , INC. ou lasW reach . r_ siden RB/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. T Cotist.ruction hispecticti tic Wlated leets Carlson Testing, nc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oragon 97281 Prone (503)684-?460 FAX#684-0954 August 8 , 1994 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: August 5 & 6, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tiga_d, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy & W. 'Ahi-te #599 08--05-94: CTI representative verified size and placement of rebs and cleanliness of cells for today's 8" CMU grout pour. All appear to be per plans and specifications. Limits of placement: 1 . Top out of walls on Line 10, from A to D. 2 . Top out of walls on Line .12, from D to F. 3 . Top out of walls on Line A, from 8 to 10 and 3 to 5. 4 . Doorway lintels on A Line. CTI representative also witnessed grout pour. Mason used vibrator during pour_ . Cast one set of ( 3) 1/2 block prisms of pour. 08-06-94: CTI representative performed visual inspection on the placement of r-ebar into exterior wall located at loading Grids C. 9,'12-10. 1 from slab on grade to top. All rebar was checked for clearances, size, grade and spacings, which conformed to the structural drawings . Quality control testing was performed on 1st truck and three concrete compressive strength cylinders cast from same. All test results were given to Robinson's representative upon completion of tests . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full , without prior authorization from this office. $94-1566 August 8, 1994 Page 2 of 2 If there are an} further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTIN , INC. i glas W. Leach P esident HPM/WW/ecp cc: Price Costcn c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of '.'igard Robinson Construction Co. Carlson Testing, Inc. Ccnut;uction Inspection &Related Tests Geotechnical Consulting REPORT 0F6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS ----- P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39/C231 -- -� Phone(503)684.3460 FAX M 684-0954 Date Molded: -- 08/06 19 94 Job No. 94-1566 - Perrnit No: Client: .._ PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTHERSHTP COSTCO TIGARD STORE Project: - TIGARD OR Address: -- --- — — -- — ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: --- - - pub Contractor: -- -- -- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 120 219024-15 Concrete Supplier: ___-Truck No. -- Ticket No. s- R R . WHITE _Cu.Yds. __ 10/10 Load No1 Cast By: ___._ _—_ — SUNNY 84 55 Weather Temp.High: - Temp.Low: EXTERIOR WALL @ LOADING DOCK m C .9/12 TO 10 . 1 . THIS TEST location of Placement: - -- -- REPRESENTS THE BOTTOM HALF OF THIS WALL 10:20 79 _ __—Test Time: -_-. Concrete Temp: 28 4 " I Strength Requirement: _.-__--_��Q--_.__-__ PSI days Slump Cement Type - - 242 4 . 1% 3/4 " Mix No./Ni.; Sacks --- Kr Content - - ----- Max.Aggre,inte _------- - - W/AEA Admix.Amount: _Brand: ---__Admix.Amount: _- Set Test® Register Date Date Total AUnit Re ort Tested Area No. Days Number Rec'd Test Load PSI No. By 7 6466 08/08 08/13 100,650 28.30 3560 47 JB 28 6466 08/08 09/03 128,930 28.32 4550 1 65 1 JB 28 6466 08/08 09/03 131,110 28.32 4630 65 JB cc :CITY OF TIGARD ' Remarks: ------_ -- -- — --------- ROBINSON CONSIRUCII17IN CU InformAtion rNibilned herein is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. Constn:ction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 2.3814 OSTM C172/C143/C1O64/C1231/C31/C3`�/C231 Tigard,Oregon 972.81 Test Methods: _- Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molrled: 08/06 _ 19 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: -_ Client: —_ PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Address: -• Rr`BINSON CONSTRUCTION Sub Contractor: -- Contractor: ---_�— , -- — Concrete Supplier. - LONE STAR NORTHWEST Truck No. _ 120 Ticket No. 219024-3.5 R . WHITE C i.Yds 10/10 --�^ Load No. -- Cast By: SUNNY +14 55 Weather: _ ---Temp.High: ----Temp.Luw- EXTERIOR WALL ® LOADING DOCK @ C .9/12 TO 10 . 1 . THIS TEST Location of Placement: — � REPRESENTS THE BOTTOM HALF OF THIS WALL 10=20 79 _ Test Time: ---Concrete Temp: _ 28 4" I Shength Requirement: _- 4000 PSI• days Slump ---- -Ce.mont Tyr)P 242 4 . 1% 3/4 " Mix NoJNo.Sacks - Air Content -•----_- - Max.Aggregatr, - W/AEA Admix.Amount: —Brand: Admix.Amount: __— Brand: --- Set Test® Register Date Date Total AUnit Report Tested No. Days Number RecdArea Test Loed PSI No. ey 7 6466 08/08 08/13 100,650 28.30 3560 47 JR 28 6466 08/08 09/03 28 6466 08/08 09/03 i f . =CITY OF TIGARD , Remarks: e�-r — tnrnrmatkm rAmmnad herein Is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. C'oiisti-uction Inspection& Related'lests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX #684.0954 August 5, 1994 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: August 3 & 4, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 08-03-94: CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today's 8" CMii grout pour. All appears to be per plans nd specifications . Witnessed grout pour also. Mason used vibrator_ during pour. Limits of placement: 8" CMU walls, 1st 4 ' lift an A Line, from 4 .5 to 6 and 9 to 10; Line 10, from .A to E; screen wall at compactor/baler; and lintels at doorways on K Line. 08-04-94 : CTI reprp5enLative verified size and placement of rebar and cleanliness of ^ells for today's 8" CMU grout pour. All appear to be per plans and specifications . Also witnessed grunt of these walls . Mason used vibrator during pour. Limits of placement: 1 . Top out of wall on 12 line, from G to E. 2 . 1st 4 ' of wall on 12 Line, from D to E. 3. Top out of screen wall at. compactor/baler. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. $94-1.566 Augact 5, 1994 Page 2 of 2 If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, Vsident Q 'ST ', INC. glas Leach HPM/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mutvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT 0F8X8X 16 PRISMS _ TEST SPECIMENS P.O.Box 23814 UBC 24-26 Phone(503)g684-3460 Test Methods: - ----- FAX#684.0954 Date Molded: 08/05 ' 19 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: _-------- - - Client: , PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE Address: TIGARD OR __.. -- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION °ubCtx'�.,,,ctor NUGENT MASONRY Contractor: — Concrete Supplier: - LONE STAR P1ORTHWEST ___Truck No. __. 266 Picket No. . 234234 Cast By: H .P . MURPHY —Cu.Yds —,F_-------_______Load No.l.-- ---- OVERCAST 80 55 Weather: ---- Temp.High: — Temp.Low; --- 8" CMU WALLS , TOP OUT OF WALL ON LINE 10 FROM A TO D , 12 FROM Location of Placement: — — D TO F , A FROM 8 TO 10 & 3 .2 TO 4 .8 AND LINTELS ON A LINE ---- 2:?0 77 Test Timo _- -- -- -Concrete Temp: 1500 ;'st FLOWARLE I Strength Requirement: -- - -- PSI a days S!ump --- Cement Type 883/6 SACK 3/4" Mix No./No.Sacks Air Content - - --- Max.Aggregate ----- --- - Admix.Amount: -_ Brand: _— Admix.Amount: ____.Brand: -- Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit He ort Tested No. Days Number , Rec'd Tost Load PSI No. By 7 6509 08/05 08/12 85,693 53.38 1610 43 JB 28 6509 08/05 09/02 11-9,940 53.37 2440 66 JB 28 6509 08/05 09/C2 133,370 53.37 JB Remarks: cc:CITY OF TIGARD -._. - - -- ._-----— ROBINSON ( ( 1U( t'_ +ntn+r++ognn a nntainorl heroin Ic not to he rAnrnrtuced.axceot in full.without prior authorization from this office. • Construction Inspeetimi & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting aEPORT OF8X8X 16 PRISMS _ _TEST SPECIMENS P.U. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon 97281 1 est Methods: U8C 2426 - __ --_ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 )ate Molded: 08/05 -. 19. 94 Job No. -94-1566 _ Permit No: ----------------------_.._._`_-_-__- ,tient: ._____ PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP_ project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE - TIGARD OR 4ddress: --- --- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION NUGENT MASONRY contractor: _—Sub Contractor: — LONE STAR NORTHWEST 2_66 234234 ,oncrete Supplier: _-- _ —Truck No. — Ticket No. 3ast By: _ H .P . MURPHY _Cu.Yds. _ E' Load No.l_— OVERCAST 80 55 Neather. ___ _— _ —Temp.High: — Temp.Low: — 8" CMU WALLS , TOP OUT OF WALL ON LINE 10 FROM A TO D , 12 FROM .ocation of Placement: --- D TO F , A FROM 8 TO 10 & 3 .2 TO 4 .8 AND LINTELS ON A LINE 2:20 77 .-- Test Time: — --_ Concrete Temp: __-- 1500 28 FLOWARL_E I Strength Requirement: -PSI ® days Slump - ...._Cement Type —.-- 883/6 SACK 3/4" Mix No./No,Sarks Air Content --- — Max.Aggregate — Admix.Amount: Brand: — —Admix.Amount: Brsnd: �_— Set Testa Register Date Date Total Area Unit Re rt Tested No. Days Number Reed Tost Load PSI No. By 7 6509 08/05 08/12 35,693 53.38 1610 43 JB 28 6509 Oq/05 09/02 28 6509 08/05 09/02. Remarks: cc :CITY OF TIGARD -- L l- t inf,, wmm prwoolvwd harMn In not to ho mnmorfuced.except in full,without prior authorization from this office. City of Tigard MECHANICAL PERMIT Planck/Rec. # 13125 sw Hall Bird. APPLICATION Permit # M es Iq2 a 5 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 Table 3A Macllanical Code QTY PRICE AMT Joh /� � SUJ Qj� ti 1) Permit Fee -0- -0- 10.00 Addreas w'— `— — 2) Surplemental Fermi: 3.00 F•umace--b-=,=-I3TU— 1) ;ncl.ducts 8 vents 6.00 •�v -- - -7u-mace 100,000 13FL, +� Owner 2; incl. ducts 1 vents 7.50 -T Floor 3) incl.vent 6.00 n"'jT° 'Z-.7.1i'-""""_'� ---• SuspQ530 hoater,wall heater 4) or floor mounted heater 6.00 c ._..- - ---- - �n no �ncT.- Occupant 5) appliance permit 3.00 --- `--' -Aapair of heating,ra ng. 6) cooling,absorption unit 6.00 �"'---- i er or comp, a pump,air Ai �, (�- C�-� j• 7) to 3 HP absorp unit to 100K BTU - 6.00 Owl 41"" - -mai er or�pTa pu(mp,air ca Cr- !7--r= -,-�—�� ' 8) 3-15 HP absom unit to 500K BTU 1100 Contractor fis' ter or comp,host pump,air cond. 9) 15-30 HP absorp unit.5-1 mil BTU 1500 Boiler or comp,heat pump,as cor . - ��7� 10) 30-50 HP absorp unit 1-1.75 mil BTU 22.50 hereby ga of T aF-vu reaoF is appZA- FF FaTffio Holler or Comp, )aa puT rnp,Tr co information given is correct,that I am the owne•or aud-Hized agent 11) ,50 HP absorp unit 1.75 mil BTU 37.50 of the owner,that plans submitted are in compliance with State '-fir han i�!iN unit to- i --- laws,that I am registered with tfh,ii Construction Contrartor's Board, 121 10,000 CFM 4.50 that the number given is correct. (If exempt from Shite registration, it handling unit -� -- - please give reason below.) 13) 10,000 CTM+ 7.50 ------.-- -- - on portable 14) evaporate cooler � r (e t 4.50 - -' vent tan connected 15) to a single duct 7.00 ntilation system no 16) included in appliance permit 4.50 Hood zeroed by 17) mechanical exhaust 4.50 -T9scn wo new arld5tion U alWr-it•o'n U- repair --Commercial or in s naT---- —" to be done resid6ntal Q non-residential 18) type incinerator 30.00 xis ng use 0 �— --- er 1.e,4 w 5 5 Us- v®,wae—t r—'-` building or property -_ - _- 19) heater;4;olar,clothes dryers,etc. + 4.50 S 61 Proposed use of 20) Gas alp:ng one to four outlets 2.00 building or property Type of fuel -oil(;D natural gas Q LPG Q eledric Q 21) Mrre than 4•per outlet - NOTICE- -- Minimum Fee$25.00 SUBTOTAL r�• 7Jr PERMITS BECOME VOID IF WORK OR;ONSTRUCTION -- - "- AUTHORIZ.ED IS NOT COMMENCED WIIHIII 130 r)AYS,OR 5%SURCHARGE IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME PLAN REVIEW 25%OF.SUBTOTAL AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. i TOTAL Speriel Conditions by WMECUPW �ei0'eamd+y Construction Inspection&Related"Pests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684.3460 FAX#684-0954 August 3, 1994 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: August 3, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 08-03-.94- CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today's concrete pot .: . All appears to be per plans and specifications. Limits of placement: Floor slab on grade, Grids D to E, from 9 to 12 . CTI representative also obtained samples, took temperature, slumps and cast one set of (3) 6x12 test cylinders of pour, approximately 90 yards. Our reports per-tairt to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except. in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do ;got hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully su itted, S�N �'E T/IN , INC. Do as W. ach P e ldent HPM/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of 'Tigard Robinson Construction Co. ' 7 1 Testing, Cnstr<cirIrspecfon 6, Related TestsC�� 1�nn In�� Geotcwirrical Consulting REPORT-OF3X8X 16 PRISMS TEST SPECIMENS t - P.O. Pox 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: UBC 24-26 __— ______.__—_ —-__ Phone(503)664-3460 FAX tf 684-0954 1 Date Molded: 08/03 19 94 Job No. � 4-1566 - Permit No: ___ -- ! Client: _. PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: _ COSTCO TIGARD STORE -- -- -- - TIGARD OR Address: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION NUGENT MASONRY Contractor: � - -------Sub Contractor: -- - - --- ' I Concrete S:ippller. ONE STAR NORTHWEST Truck No. — _ Ticket No. 216515 H .P . MURPHY 10 1 Cast By: Cu.Yds. Load No. OVERCAST 82 55 Weather: _ Temp.High: Temp.Low: — 8" CMU BLOCK' WALLS , 1ST 4FT LIFT ON A LINE( 4 .5 TO 6 & 9 TO 10 ) Location of Placement: LINE 10 FROM A TO E & SCREEN WALL 0 COMP/BALER & DOORWAY LINTELS ON K LINE 10:30 74 _--__- Test Time: -___-_Concrete Temp: 1500 28 FLOWABLE I Strength Requirement: - PSI days Slump __ Cement Type #683/6 SK 3/8" Mix No./Nn.Sacks -Air Content -- Max.Aggregate _— - Admix.Amount: __— —Brand: Admix.Amount: Brand: Set Test® I Register Date Date Total Area Unit Repnrt Tested No. Days I Number Recd Test Load PSI No. By 7 6528 08/05 08/10 78,670 53.38 1470 40 JB 26 6528 08/05 08/31. 28 6528 08/05 08/31 I cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION l --- InformMtMn ix" Inad herain is not to be reornduced,except in full,without P)rior authorization from this office Construction Inspection &Ref-ted Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS - P.O. Box 23814 Test Methods: ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 97281-_ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX q 684-0954 Date Molded: 08./03 --- 19.. 94 Job No. . 94-1566_` Permit No: --------- Client: __ PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY QARTNERSHIP Project: _—_COSTCO TIGARD STORE Address: _ TIGARD OR -- --- �- — - - — Contractor: _-_.ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION -_Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: LONE STAR NORTHWEST- __ Truck Nu. 101 Ticket No. 234121 H .P . MURPHY 10/90 2/9 Cast By. _ - -- _-- _ _ Cu.Yds. - _Load Nn. -- _----. OVERCAST 82 Z)5 Wpal1mr _-_- — _—__-- ---- --- _Temp.High: ------_____—Temp.Lo%v _ FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , GRIDS D TO E FROM 9 TO 12 Location of Placement: — - -- ----------- --- Test Time: 5:30 —Concrete Temp: 74 3000 2.8 5" I Strength Requirement: — __ PSI 0 ------days Slump -- Cement Type -----. Mix No./No.Sacks —_-- Alr Cuntent — -.------ Max.Aggregate 3/4 4rimix.Amount: _ Brand: -- _Admix.Amount: _._.—_ Brand: — Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load _ - PSI No. By — 7 6421 08/04 08/1 66,764 28.31 2360 39 J" 28 6421 08/04 08/3 2.8 6421 08/04 08/3 Remarks: cc:CIT'( OF TIGARD ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION CO kDDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS = 4 112" , 5" informaW can:dned herein Is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. Constniction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc,. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF8X8X 16 PRISMS TEST SPECIMENS -- F .). Box 23814 or, 97281 fest Methods: UBC 24-26 - - Ph ne(03)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: — 08/0` - , 19 94 Job No. 94-156!' Permit No: _. Tient: —.-PRICE. COSTCO CiO MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP project: — COSTCO TIGARD S f ORE TIGARD OR Address: -�----- - - -- - - ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION NUGENT MASONRY ,ontractor. _ --Sub Contractor: - LONE STAR NORTHWEST 60 21651.5 concrete Supplier: ___Truck No. _ -___-___-_.ticket No. "ast By: .- H_P . MURPHY Cu.Yds. W_�10 ___ -Load No.1 OVERCAST rj ' 55 Weather: ___ - — -Temp.High: ---------Temp.Low: __ 8" CMU 8L.00K WALLS , 1ST 4FT LIFT ON A LINE( 4 .5 TO 6 & 9 TO 10 ) _ocation of Placement: --- INf.: 10 FROM A 1-0 E & SCREEN WALL. 0 COMP/BALER & DOORWAY '_INTELS ON K LINE 10:30 74 Test Time: __ - -Concrete Temp: 1 500 28 F-LOWACiLL I 1�trerngth Requirement: PSI 0 - ---days Slump - Cement Type _ OH83/6 SK 3/8" Miv No./No.Sacks Air Content -- Max.Aggregate ----_-- Admix.Amount: Brand: -Admix.Amount: ..— _—Brand: - Set Test@ Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load PSI No. By 7 6528 08/05 08/10 78,670 53.38 1470 40 JB 28 652E 08/05 08/31 131,760 53.38 2470 64 JB 28 6528 08/05 06/31 1.05,940 53.38 2360 64 JB Remarks: cc:CITY OF TIGARD ROBINSON CONS TRUC-- — — - tnfoi"V len MdMnsd heroin Is not to be revroduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geote<hnicai' Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE TESTSPECIMENS --- P.n. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C123i/C31/C39 _ _-_- Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Mcided: - 08/03 19_ `�A_ Job No. Permit No: -- Client: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP_ Project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE Address: TIGARD OR Contractor: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Sub Contractor: ConcreteSuppller: - LONE STAR NORTHWESTTruck No. __ 101 _ Ticket No. 2341"1 Cast By: H .P . MURPHY --___._Cu.Yds. __ 10/90 - -----Load No.2--19-------- OVERCAST 62 55 Wnather: -- ----Temp.High: _—_-__.--Ternp.Love: — FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , GRIDS D TO E FROM 9 TO 12 1 ncation of Placement: -- — Tost Time: 5.,30 Concrete Temp: 74 - 1' 28 ';trengih Requirement: 3000 _-- PSI 0 _ -days Slump 5 —Cement Type I Mix No./No.Sacks 1<- --- Air Content --- Max.Aggregate 3/4 — Admix.Amount: --Brand: --- ---Admix.Amount: Brand: Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Rec'd Test Load PSI No. By 7 6421 08/04 08/1C 66,764 28.31 2360 39 JB 28 6421 08/04 08/31 91,362 28.35 3220 63 JB 28 6421 08/04 08/3 (32,754 28.35 3270 63 JB Remarks: cc:CITY OF TIGARD ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION CO ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS _ 4 1/2" , 5" Infornw Won contained herein Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorizallcm frc m this office. eelloii Ilests Carlson Testing, Inc. Construction L Geotechnicitl Crnault nK P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX K 694.0954 August 1, 1994 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: August 1, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 08-01 -94: CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today's concrete pour. All appears to be per plans and specifications. Limits of placement: 1. 6" floor slab on grade, Grids 9 to 10, from A to D. 2 . 6" floor slab on grade, Grids 9 to 12, from E to F. 3. P.it floor for dock levelers. CTI representative also obtained samples and took slumps and temperatures and -.:<<tt two sets of (3) 6x12 test cylinders of today's pour of 106 yards. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to bo reproduced, except in full, without prio-- authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TE STI G, NC. Douglas W, Leach President HPM/ecp cc: : Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS - P.O. Box 23814 ASTM ( 172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Iigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: --._.. _-_-- Phune(503)684-3460 FAX M 684-0954 Date Molded: - 08/01 -- 19--94 Job No. _94_1566 Permit No: ---- Client: _____ PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: _ COSTCO TIGARD STORE Address: __ TIGARD OR ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Sub Contractor. Contractor: - - -- - Concrete Supplier: - LONE STAR NORTHWEST --Truck No. _-_--_--_---- Ticket No. _-- ---__-�_— 216326 Cast sv: _ H.P . MURPHY - Cu.Yds. ------201110- -- Load No.2/11 - - we ither: - __ SUNNY _Temp.High: 84 Temp.Low: 55 SLAB ON GRADE , GRIDS 9 TO 10/A TO D & 9 TO 12/ FROM E TO F . u mi,n of Placement: - -- -- - c'', T FLOOR FOR DOCK LEVELERS 6:35/8:05 74 75 Test Time: _- Concrete Temp: --- 3000 28 5" 1 Strength Requirement ----- PSI 0 -.--._-.days Slump 5-t e2 Cement Type - 227 3/4" Mix No./No. Sacks ---- ---Ah Content ------------ Max.Aggregate �^ Admix.Amount: ___ Brand: Admix.Amount: Brand: Set TWO Register Date Date Total Unit Re ort Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load Area PSI No. By 1 7 6377 08/03 08/06 99,388 28.38 3150 36 JB 28 6377 08/03 08/29 121,610 28.36 4290 61 JB 28 6377 08/03 08/29 120,040 28.36 4230 61 JB II 7 6378 08/03 08/Oe 92,647 28.38 3270 36 JB 28 6378 08/03 08/29 117,860 28.36 4160 61 JB 28 6378 08/03 08/2 119,960 28.36 4230 61 JB F7emarks. cc=CITY OF TIGARD —i; ATN 09-C O S T RIIcfi-T—ON—C O ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS = 5 1/4" , 4 3/4" , 6" , 5" . LOADS BATCHED to 3" SLUMP ._ - CO ACTO , P P OP RATGR & FINISHER ADDED WATER ACCORDINGLY Information cc whit d herein Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting 6X12 CONCRETE REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 2:814 97281 ASTM C172/C] 43/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Phone(503) -346 Test Methods: �_._-_---- ----.--- --- .--------- Phone(5X#684-3460 FAX N 684-0954 08/01 94 94-1566 Date Molded: - - -, 19----- Job No. - ------- Permit Na - --------- -------- Client: _ PRICE COSTCO C/O MUL_VANNY PARTNERSHIP Project . COSTCO TIGARD STORE Address: __- TIGARD OR Contractor: _ ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION ___-Sub Contractor: -- ---- - -.----- --- Concrete Supplier: No. - Ticke,No.LONE STAR NORTHWEST_ 85/82- 216314 J _^Truck _._ _ 216326 H.P . MURPHY 20/110 ]. Cast By: --- _ —___—�--� ___Cu.Yds. ----_ - Lead No.2/1_. _ SUNNY 84 55 Weather: _ r Temp.'nigh: -_ -__-Temp.Low: SLAB ON GRADE , GRIDS 9 TO 10/A TO D & 9 TO 12/ FROM E TO F . Location of Placement: - ----- ------ — — PIT FLOOR FOR DOCK LEVELERS 6:35/8:05 74 75 _Test Time: Concrete Temp: 3000 28 5" I strength Requirement: _-_- -- -___.-- . _. _- PSI ® --- ---days Slump 5_ u--Cement Type -- 227 3/4 " Mix No./No.Sacks ----.- ---Air Content -------- - Max.Aggregate ---- - — Admix.Amount: _ _ _ __Brand: —__—___Admix.Amount: -- Set Test I - Register Date Date i otal - Area Unit RepPort Tested No. Days t Number Recd Test - Load PSI No. By I 7 6377 _ 08/03 08/0 89,388. 28.38 3150 36 JB 28 6377 08/03 08/2 28 6377 08/03 08/2 II 7 6378 08/03 08/OE3 92,647 28.38 3270 36 JB 28 6378 08/03 08/2 28 6378 08/03 08,'2 r_c:CITY OF TIGARD' ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS = 5 1/4" , 4 3/4" , 6" , 5" . LOADS BATCHED A 3" SLUMP . -- CO-N AC' OR ,-P0-RP-OPERATOR & FINISHER ADDED WATER ACCORDINGLY inrn,mawo r. *61rwil horoon Is not to be reoroduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection& Relntrd Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Dox 23814 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 July 28, 1994 FAX#684-0954 94-1566 Permit. No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: July 28, 199i PROJECT: Costco Tigard tore ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 07-28-94: CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today's concrete pour. All appears to be per plans and specifications. Limits of placement: 1 . Foundation wall on 10 Line, from A to D. 2 . Dock wall on D Line, from 10 to 12 . 3. Foundation wall on 12 Line, from E to D. CTI rep7esentative also cast one set. of. ( 3) 6x12 test cylinders. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there aye any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfplly submi d, CT1?1. T/ES ING C. ug as W. each P�e ident L'I/ HPM/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. Construction InsWction & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O.Box 23814 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Test Methods: _ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX N 684-0954 Date Molded: -----._ 07/28 19. 94 - Job No. 94~1566 Permit No: -- ------- Client: _ PP_CE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Proieci: — COST�:O TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Ar'cress: -- ^—--------- --- --- Sub Contractor. Contractor: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Coocrete Supplier: LONE STAR NORTHWEST _Truck No. _ 101 ---Ticket No. 192299 Cast 6y: H .P . MURPHY Cu.Yds. _ 20 Load No.2 _ SUNNY 92 58 Weather: Temp.High: Temp.Low: ----- FOUNDATION !MALL ON 10 LINE FROM A TO D , DOCK WALL ON D LINE 10 Location of Placement: --- - - _ TO 12 & FOUNDATION WALL ON 12 LINE FROM E TO D 6:45 74 Time: _ -_Concrete Temp: 3000 28 4 „ 1 Strength Requirement: - -- - — PSI a days Slump - - Cement Type --- 227 3/4° Mix No./No.Sacks -Air Content Max.Aggregate ------ Admix.Amount: — Brand: __—.Admix.Amount: - Brand: - ----- Set Test Register Date Date Total Area I Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Rec'd Test Load P81 No. _ By 8 6451 08/05 08/0 67,434 28.32 2280 33 JB 28 6451 08/05 08/25 100,060 28.36 3530 60 JB 28 6451 08/05 08/2E 101,180 28.36 3570 60 JB cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: a � ---— inMrmatkrl rxKdail harain is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspertion &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X 12 CONCRETE _— TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C143/C:.064/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon684-346 Test Methods: _—._ — Phone(5X#684-3460 FAX q 6$4-0954 Date Molded: _ 07,128 —_� 19 - 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: --- ---- - Client: .—__,PRICE COSTCO C/O MJLVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: -.. COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR - - - ---Address: Contractor. — ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION pub Contractor: -- — --- ------- — --- --_-- Concrete Supplier: LONE STAR NORTHWEST 101 — 192299 —� Truck No. _ —_Ticket No. Cast By: _�_ H .P . MURPHY -_ —Cu.Yds. _�_20 ---Load No.G SUNNY 92 58 Weather. ----- -- — Temp.High: — Temp.Low: FOUNDATION WALL ON 10 LINE FROM A TO D , DOCK WALL ON D LINE 10 Location of Placement: ------ — -- -- TO 12 & FCUNDATION WALL ON 12 LINE FROM E TO D 6:45 74 _T___- �.--_----.__--_-_---- -- -----Test Time: —GmcreteTemp: -- --- 3000 28 4 " I Strength Requirement: -- — ----- ------ ----_-PSI _--_--- - days Slump --- --Cement Type _— 227 3/4" Mix No./No.Sacks _Air Content --- --Max.Aggregate - -------- - Admix.Amount: __._Admix.Amount: --Brand: _ -- Set I Test® i Register Date Date Total Area Unit Re ort Tes,9d No. Days Number Recd Test _ Load_ _ PSI Nom — By 8 6451 08/05 08/05 67,434 28.32 2280 33 JB 28 6451 08/05 08/2 28 6451 08/05 06/2 cc=CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: inform~m. oAr ed herein is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. Constmct oii Inspectioit& Related Tests Carlson. Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consultfiv P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)694 3460 FAX #684-G954 July 27, 1995 94-1566 Permit No. BUY 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: July 27, 1994 PROJECT: Coutco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 07-27-94 : CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today's 8" CMU grout pour All appears to be per plans and specifications. Limits of. placement: Grid Line A, from 4 to 9 top out. CTI representative also witnessed grouting of same. See previous report of 7/19 and 7/25: Mason has used MAPEI brand, planigrout 750 grout to fill holes at elevation 0-0 of foundation wall along Grid Line 12 . He also cast one 1/2 block prism of grout to test for strength. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except .in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, 0 /NG C. Doas W. P sident HPM/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 8X8X 16 PRISMS TEST SPECIMENS — P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: UBC 24-2h _ _______� ____-________^__._ _____—____ Phone(503)684-3460 ,"— �- FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: __ 07/27 _ 19-_.94.__ .Job No. -94-1566 Permit No: - - Client: —___PRICE COSI CO C/O-MULVANNY PAR i NERSH_IP Project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE Address: T I GARn OR Contractor: — ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Sub Contractor: NUGENT MASONRY Concrete Supplier: _— .-Truck No. —Ticket No. -- -- Cast By: NUGENT MASONRY ---- .Cu.Yds. Load No. K Weather: _ SUNNYY'^ _ Temp.High: 98 _.—_Temp.Low: ---- GRID LINE 12 Location of Place mt: — — - - -- — — -- - -- - - --.--- _— __—Test Time: ___-- ----- --Concrete Temp - — --- ._ Strrno;h Requirement: - 1 500 PSI 0 _ 2t3 days Slump ---Cement Type I Mix No./No.Sacks --- ------ Air Content -- -- - - - - Max.Aggregate ------ Admix.Amount: __—. — — —Brand: __._.__.Admix.Amount- _ ---Brand: Set Test Registei Date Date Total Area Unit Raport Tested No. Days Number Recd ;Too 28 6327 08/01 08124 110,590 53.39 2070 59 JB cc-'CI 'e OF TIGARU L___ RO INStm-CORNS - -- NUGENT MA.SONR ---._ .- - Remarks: - - - -- *MAPEI BRAND , PLANIGROUT 750 Inln,mmonn rrwvh*wt humin la int to ha ranrrxtucad.excent Infill.without ndor nuthodration from this office. Construction Inspection& Related'Testa Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23614 Tigard, Oregon 97261 Phone(503)684-3460 July 26, 1994 FAX x 684-0954 94-1566 Permit No. BUF 94 -0001 FIELD 'INSPECTION REPORT DATES COvERED: July 2.6, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 07-26-94: ^_TI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today's CMU grout pour. All appears to be per plans and specifications. Limits of placement: 11 8" CMU wall on Grid Line 12, from H tc F - top out. 2. 8, CKU foundation wall on Grid Line 12, from F to i , 3. 8" CMU wall on Grid Line A, from 4 to 3 - l-,t 4 ' . 4. Vii" CMU wall of tire shop, Room #126 & 130 - top (jut. CTI representative also witnessed grouting of these walls. Mason used vibrator during pour. Cast one set of (3) 1012 block prisms of this pour. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TES7 NC. Doug�as W Leach President HPM/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. Construction Inspection & Related'rests, Carls0. t Testing, Inc. Geoteclm;cal Consulting P.O. Box 23614 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 July 26, 1994 FAX X684-0954 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 IELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: July 25, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tiaarri, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 07-25-94: CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today's 8" CMU grout pour. All appears to be per plans and specifications . Limits of placement: 1 . 1st 4 ' lift of 8" CMU wall from E to G, on 12 Line. 2 . let 41 lift of outaide walls of rooms #128 and 130 of tire shop. 3 . Foundation wall- on A Line, from 8 to I.0. CTI representative witnessed grout placement. Mason used vibrator during pour. NOTE: On Grid Line 12 in area where verticals were not poured in place (see prevlo-s report) , mason has set verticals in wall and has provided cut-outs at elevation 0-0 to verify grout- coverage. Any that did not grout will. be epoxied ,.n tomorrow. Our reports pertain to the material tested/insnected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARL? TESTI , / INC. Douglas W. Leach President HPM/ecp cc:: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. Construction Irrspectam & Related Tests Inc.Carlson Testing, Geotechnical Consulting REPORTOF 8XBX16 PRISMS _ TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: 1..)Bt.• 24-26 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX ri 684-0954 Date Molded: 0 `' Job No. — Permit No: Client: F'h'T.(.' rOSTC0 C/0 Mt.11_VANN1' 1-'rih ll 'i _ Project: . - _ - -- - - Address: -- ------ ----- GOntraCh r: . I )'I KI TON Sub Contractor: I`II It�F"IV f f1A`,tll'JRY — — Concrete Supplier: -I1 I '( I.I' '' 1111 1(. f -Truck No. -Ticket No. 1 � Cast By Cu.Yde. _,+.Load No. - LINNY ;y Weather - Temp.High: Temp.I.ow: ,�" P1t1 1.JF)i l.', , �,Ft]T', I f i•r)P1 f. ' '` 1"f lIll 0I.YT F(it IND(JTOI`I F TO r Location of Placement: t. ]F l 1 To 0 ON 0 [ TNI' Test Time: --- --Concrete Tema: ---- Strength Requirement: --..-- —PSI * - ---days Slump Cement Type --- Mix No./No.Sacks - — Air Con%nt --- -- Max.Aggregate ——- --- Admix.Amount: _ _Brand: —.--_---Admix.Amount: ----Brand: sat Test*Test* Register Date Date Total unit Report Tested No. Days Number Rec'd fest Load Area PSI No. BV 78,970 53.38 1480 30 JB 130,740 53.38 2450 58 JB 132,690 53.38 2490 58 JB Remarks: _- ` CITY OF T I VI AD, f3nT(.ii T )r1F 1." : ?U F' .I'l r Thn�,li rI"If. 50 r ,F. Infnrn xtinn rxwvMkmd horain In not to he reproduced,extent In full,without prior authorization from this ntfice. Construction Inspertion & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF A-X8X1k- PRISM'— TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: LJR( Phone(503)684-3460 FAX #684-0954 Date Molded: 0/ — - _6 19— Job No. Permit No: ------ Client: r-,PICE COSTC17) 1-0 11 p1ect: l. .rr r1 TTGARD Address: T T G fll R P 0 C(,ntractor: --Sub Contractor: t 11 ij IV Ait 11" Concrete Supplier. LOH[. —Truck No. I T1oWt No. Cast By: Cu.Yds. Lor#d No. Weather: Temp.High: Temp.Low: W0 II)II11F)ATION F TO r Location of Placement: TOP OUT or Ti-pr qjf-ir, I,wd I hN1 I I c.1 iF r I 11' , r il f-40 o L TNI'' Test Time: Concrete Temp: I Strength Recloirement: _________PSlG ---days S)ump Cement Type Mix No./No.Sack-; Air Content Max.Aggregate Admix.Amount: Brand: --- ---Admix.Amount: —Brand: Set Test® Register Date Date Total Unit Report Tested No. Days Wimber Rec'd Test Load Area PSI No. By 78,970 53.38 1480 30 JB Remarks. I �CITY OF TIGARD. rN(')R T NSON (* (7N17,TR(.Ir. TT(')N F71' FA A T I T j MF 1 0 F` -I'l —T- j 1,;11 Prit.11- 50 17, .M . tnfnrrtwtkffl exmMined herein is not to be renroduce(;•except in full,without prior nuthori7.aflon from this office. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting HSPORT OF 4X�1Xt3 GROU i _ TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 fest Methods: 1JBC 24-28 _r _ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 fate Molded: - --- 07125 , 19 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit N); PRICE= COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERF&ITF, I COSTCO 1IGARD STORE project: —-- TIGARD OR Address: -- ------— - --- -- F7OBINSON c ONSTRUCTION Contractor: - —Sub Contractor: -- -------- LONE `STAR NOR'iHWEST Truck No. ._ l _T - Ticket No. '" Q74r�1 Concrete Supplier: — — - I i F . MI IF"( 11r 7 01_ 10 1 OF 2 Cast By: --Cu.Yds. Load Mo. -- t 11,11\IY 8A r Woather. ---- Temp.High: Temp.Low: -----' -- 1:7T %t f I LIFT OF 8" CMU WALL FROM E TO G ON 12 L.INC AND RM Location of Placement. - 11128 & 130 . ALSO FOUNDATION ON A LINE FROM 8 TO 10 . 8: 30 75 Test Time: — Concrete Temp: -- 2000 20 FLOWoBL-E I Strength Requirement: PSI —days Slump ®Cement Type -- #883 3/`i Mir No./No.Sacks Air Content Max.Aggregate ---- — Admix.Amount: — Brand: -------Admix.Amount: Brand: —----- Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Redd Test _ Load PSI No. By 7 628r, 07/:?8 08/01 37,415 16 2340 18 JB "8 628(, 07/28 08/2 58,436 16 3650 57 JB 28 x,286 07/23 08/2: 57,239 16 3580 57 JB rtpnarkt: cc:CITY OF TIGARD — RORMSON S t_. 0 (7-0 lnfnrtmlNnn cerilek ed herein Is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing Inc. geotechnical Consulting FL-PORT-OF 4X4X8 GROUT TEST SPECIMENS --- P.U. Box 23814 UBC 24-28 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: 07/2-5 ____ , 19 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: Client: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANMY PARTNERSHIP' _ Project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE — TIGARD OR Address: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: __-_..Sub Contractor: LUNE STAR NORTHWEST i12 07401 Concrete Supplier. Truck No. Ticket No. .._.. H .P . MURPHY 7 OF 10 1 0f 2 ast By: Cu.Yds. _ ____Load No. SUNNY 84 55 Weather: Temp.High: __Temp.Low: — 1ST 4 FT LIFT OF 8" CMU WALL FROM E TO G ON 12 LINE= AND RM Loca+;^n of Placement: 1'128 & 130 . ALSO FOUNDATION ON A `INE FROM 8 TO 10. 8:30 75 — Test Time: ---_Concrete Temp: 2000 2t? E LOWAE3L_r I Strength Requirement: -- PSI 0 _ _-_days Slump —__- __--Cement Tvne #883 3/u Mix No./Nc.Sacks - ------Afr Content ----- -- -- — Max.Aggregate -- -- Admix.Amount: Brand: -,drnix Amount: ___ Brand: Get Teat® Register Date Date 1 otal AUnit Flo ort Tested No. Days Number RecdArea Test Load PSI No. By 7 6286 07/28 08/01 37,415 16 2340 18 JB 28 6286 07128 08/2 28 6286 07/28 08/2 cc :CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: -- ROBINSON CONSTRUMON CO ------- -- — Infnrmetlim contained herein Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. — -� Construction Inspection& Related.tests Testing,esting, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Dox 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684.3460 FAX it 684.0954 July 22, 1994 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: July 21 & 2.2, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 07-21-94: CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar f0v 9" CMU grout pour today. All appears to be per plans and specifications . Limits of placement: 1. Top out of wall on J Line, from 6 to 12 . 2. Top out of wall on 12 Line, from K to I . 3. Foundation wall on A Line, from 4 to 9 . CTI representative also witnessed grouting of above. Mason used vibrator during pour. 07-22-94 : CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today's concrete pour of. approximately 300 yards. All appears to be per plans and specifications. Limits of placement: 1 . 6" floor slab oa grade, Grids C to D, from 3 to 9 . 2 . 6" floor slab on grade, Grids A to B, from 3 to 9 . CTI representative also obtained samples, took slumps and temperatures and cast three sets of ( 3) 6x12 test cylinders of pour. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. #94-1566 July 22, 1994 Page 2 of 2 If there are, any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTIN , C. Dou la W. Leach 4 President HPM/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. Construction Inspection M Related TestsCarlson hosting, Inc Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6 X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C7.O64/C143 hone,O3)684-34regon 61 fest Methods: Phone(503)6134-3460 FAX q 684-0954 Date Molded: 07/22 , 19 94 Job No. 94--1566 _ Permit No: -- PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Prnject - _ COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Address: —� _. - --- - ------ - - -- - ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor. _---Sub Contractor Concrete Supplier: LONE STAR NORTHWEST Truck No. 108 _Ticket No. 214875-I I 1 H .P . MURPHY --Cu.Yds. _ 229 '75__ Load No. SUNNY Cast By: ___ -- -- SUNNY 98 62 Temp.High: ----Temp.Low: - SI_AB ON GRADE A TO B FROM :3 TO Location of Placement: -- ---- - n: r,0 Test Time: - Concrete Temp: .3000 28 5" Strength Requirement: ____._._.__-_____—.__—- -_---PSI ® days Slump _. --_ Cement Type -- -- - :' 7 4 Mix No./No.Sacks Alr Content - -- -------- Max.Aggregate —.- Admix.Amount: —Brand: _.___Admix.Amount: ---------Brand: Set TWO Register Date pate Tota! Area Unit tleport Tested No. Days Number Rec'd Test woad PSI No. By T 1 I 7 6272 07/28 07/2c 78,607 28.31 2530 26 JB 28 6272 07/28 oR/1 . 112,620 28.38 3970 56 .TB 28 6272 07/28 08/1' 112,590 28.38 3970 56 JB cc =CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: -ROfiTTSnn--1CtJf7z. I RUk- I TM CU ADDITIONAL SLUMP = 4" , 4 1/2" InfomvOon cxyminnd herein is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from th! office. Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 7281 ASTM C 172/C 143/C 1064/C 1231/C31/C39 Tigard, Oregon -346 Test Methods: ___--_.— -- Phone(5X#684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: 0-7/22—fig 94 Job No. 94-156F Permit No: -- PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP - Client: _ 9999 - - Project: - COSTCO TIGARD STORE - -- - TIGARD OR Address: --- - - ---_ --- - Contractor. -- - ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION .Sub Contractor: LONE STAR NORTHWEST121/10A 21481 -' concrete Supplier: _ Tnick No. --__.—Ticket No. 1921 1.72 H .P . MURPHY Cu.Yde. ___. 20/101 Load No 2/10_� Gast By: —._ ..�.— SUNNY 98 62 Weather: -- __Temp.High: Temp.Low: SLAB ON GRADE , C TO D FROM 3 TO 9 Looetttxt of Placement: —-- — �,—.- -- -- 5:25/6' 35 —Test Time: Concrete Temp: - -- - -� 3000 28 4 1/2" I Strength Requirement- --- --- - PSI ® days Slump cam--- Cement Type --..-- - 227 - 3/4 „ Mix No./No Sacks ------Air Content -- Max Aggregate Admix.Amount: —Brand: ----Admix.Amount: —Brand: - Set Test® Register Date Date Total Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load Area PSI No. By_ 1 7 6270 07/28 07129 79,991 28.31 2830 25 JB 8 6270 07/28 08/1' 105,990 28.35 3740 55 JB 28 6270 07/28 08/19 106,550 28.35 3760 55 JB TT 7 6271 07/28 07/29 71,697 28.31 2530 25 JB z>3 6271 07/28 08/19 100,850 28.35 3560 55 JB 28 6271. 07/28 08/1 . 102.010 28.35 3600 55 — JB ec:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS = 5" , 4 1/2 " nfnrmnMrx+ctxMaMred herein Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inca Geotechnical Consulting REFURT OF 6 X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O Box 23814 ASTM C] 72/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 Tigard,Or.,gon 97281Phone(503)684-3460 Test Methods: -- FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: 0 7/221 . 19 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: Client: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Adr ess: ---- -- - -- ROBTNSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: --Sub Contractor: --- Concrete Supplier: LONE STAR NOR1•HWEST _Truck No. 108 Ticket No. _ 214875--II1 rest By: I-I .P . MURPHY _Cu.Yde. 229 .75 Load No.23 —___--- — SUNNY 'ri 62 Weather: _-_ temp.High: Temp.Low: SLAB ON GRADE A TO B FROM 3 TO Location of Placement: _—--- _- 8: 50 Test Time: - Concrete Temp: ---- -- 28 28 T Strength Requirement: _— -PSI 0 days Slump -- Cement Type -- 227 Mix No./No.Sacks --Air Content --- Mr x.Aggregate — -- — Admix.Amount: _.Brand: ----Admix,Amount: _ _ _--Brand: . — -- Set Test® Register Date DateTotal Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load PSI No. _ By iIT --- 7 6272 07/28 07/2 78,607 �.31 2530 26 JB 28 6272 07/28 08/19 28 6272 07/28 06/19 cc=CITY OF TItARD Remarks: ADDITIONAL SLUMP = 4" . 4 1/2" 1.1bi lllMlllt card0rod hoWn Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. Carlson Testing ane. Construction Inspection b Related Tests Geotechnical Consulting REPORTOF6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS " —— P.O. Box 23814 Test Methods: AS.'M C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Phone re ne( 6843460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: 07/22_ , 19—94 Job No. 94--1561:, Permit No. Client: __ FRILE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Address: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Conhector: Sub Contractor: L014E STAR NORTHWEST 1211104 214819 Concrete Supplier: _ — Truaft No. T'Ntet No, _ H .P . MURIIHY 20/101 2/10 Cast By: — _- __Cu.Yds. - _ Load No. SUNNY 98 62 Weather: _Temp.High: __ Temp.Low: SLAB ON GRADE , C TO D FROM 3 TO 9 Locaticn of Placement: 5:25/6: 35 74 7! Test Time: Concrete Temp: 3000 2.8 1./2" I Strength Requirement: — _ _— - _PSI® days Slump r v _Cement Type <27 3/4 ' Mix No/No.Sacks -- Air Content Max.Aggregate Admix.Amount: __ Brand: — _Admix.Amount: Brand: Set Test Register I Date Date Total Unit Report I Tested No. Days Number rtec'd Test load Area PSI No. By 1 7 6270 07/28 07/2 79,991 28.31 2830 25 JB 28 6270 07/28 08/1 28 6270 07/28 08/1 . 1 T 7 6271. 07/28 07/29 71,697 28.31 2530 25 JB 28 6271 07/28 08/1' 2.8 6271. 07/28 08/19 cc=CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: — ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS = 5" , 4 112" inkmnatktn txmEMnad hsrsin Is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection tic Related Testa Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 July 21, 1994 FAX 0 684-0954 oA 1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: July 21, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR; H.P. Murphy 07-21-94: CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today's concrete pour of approximately 305 yards. All appears to be per plans and sp%_Lifications. Limits of placement: 1. 6" floor slab on grade, Grids B to C, from 3 to 9 . 2 . 6" floor slab on grade, Grids D to E, from 3 to 9 . Obtained samples and cast three sets of ( 3) 6x12 test cylinders of pour. Also took slumps and temperature of concrete. Quality control on job from Lonestar and added wager to any loads not meeting specifications. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to co. tact this office. Respectfully submitted, c-ARL7 T TI INC. Do las W. ,eai.h P sident HPM/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. INSUCI'ToN-NOTICB City of Tigard Building Depart—t L3I25 SA Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Roc-O-Phone)c 639-4175 Business Phones 639-4171 Inspection:_--- r---- -_ ----_--.- -- -- Footing Plbg. Undorslab Koch. Rough In Alipr!Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing --Bldg. V1bq. Bn&m- h. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Underfloor Nater Line gyp. Bd. -Koch. L V Date Requestede_ 7 ' _Tt.. __.Y_— AM PH `7 Addreeee 55 I J't- 1.. P 4 mi i1 Bu i lder:. THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARR RRQUIRED1 Ar rrv-D 12 Inso s Dates / / z�z APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVRD SUBJRCT TO ABOVE Call For Reinsp. Constn:ction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting DEPORT OF 6 X 12 CONN-TRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O.Box 23814 T,gard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: ASTM C172/C!231/C31/C39/C10(,4/C143 _- -` Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0951 )ate Mo ded: 07/21 19 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: -- - —�---- _ _ - -- PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP ;lient ---- —- - project: - ('(-),-,TCO TIGARD STORM - -- - -- -- TIGARD OR ROBINS014 CONSTRUCTION ,ontractor: -- Sub Contractor -- ------ LONE STAT: NORTHWEST _Truck No. 108/.2_62 Ticket No. 214692 oncrete Supplier. , H.[" . MURPH'r t'0/1 1 1. .�i2/11 -ast By: __ Cu.Yds. Load No. SUNNY 99 66 Neather. Temp.High: Temp.Low: SLAB ON GRADE , GRIDS D TO E FROM 3 TO 9 -ocation of Placement: --- _ Test Time: --- Concrete Temp: --- 3000 -- ------- ;tiungth Requirement: PSi I - -- days Slump ,1 -��--ate--..-Cement Type ---- - 227 3/4 ' Mix No./No.Sacks ---- Air Content ------- Max.Aqqregate —----- -- -- Admix.Amount: _ —----Brand: Admix.Amount: _ Brand: Set Test® Register I Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days _ Number Rec'd Test --Load PSI No. By 1 7 6142 07/2.2 07/2 78,804 28.31 2780 23 JB 28 6141 07/22 Obi/1 E 118,550_-- 28.30 4190 - - 53 JB 28 6142 07/22 08/1E 17.0,060 28.30 4240 53 JB I I 7 61.4 1 07/21' 07/26 82,562 28.31 2920 23 JB :>R 614 07/22 OH 'It" 107,570 28.30 3800 53 JB 28 r- 141 07122 Osi/1 r' 107,490 28.30 3600 53 JB cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: ON J J l ADD 111OVAL SLUMP 5° , 5 1 /4 " 1nfn,mMWNn rrwdMrwM twrein is not In be renrodticnd.except in full.without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection & Related Teats Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6 X 12 CONCRL 1 E TEST SPECIMENS P.U. Box 23614 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 Tigard, Orcgon 97281 Test Methods: Phone(503)684-3460 FAX A 684-0954 07/21 94 94--1566 Date Molded: , 19 Job No. Permit No: —---- -------___ _ _ PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVAI"N',' PARTNERSHIP CiienC �� -- - - - - - ---- - -- Project; -- COSTCO TIGARD __�_ - - - — ----__- -- --- TIGARD OR Address: _ --- - --- - -- -- - --- ----- ROBINSi►N CON,TRUCT.ION Contractor: - - Sub Contractor: - ------ - ---- - L.ONE STAT: NORTHWES1 14727 Concrete Supplier: _ —Truck No. - Ticket No.H .P . IhURPHI .2 ,: 1 Cast By: - Cu.Yds. -- Load No. _ _..___�.�__.... SUNNY Weather: -_- —Temp High: Temp.Low: --- SLAB ON GRADE , GRIDS 13 To C FROM :3 To 9 L-ocation of Placement: - - - - - ----- -- 7 . 10 76 Test Time: -- Concrete temp: - 3000 29 Strength Requirement PSI A ----days Slump Cement Type 227 ?"A „ Mix No./No.Sacks ---Air Content --- Max.Aggregate ------ Admix.Amoy it: -- Brand: Admix.amount: -_-Brand: Set Teat® Register Date Date Total Unit Report Tested _No. Days Number Recd Test -Load Area pgl No. By I I I 7 6140 07;' ? 07/2t 79,022 28.31 2790 24 JB 28 6 14 0 07/22 08/1 109,750 28.30 3880 54 JB 28 63.40 0;'.'22 08/1F 107,960 28.30 3820 54 JB cc :CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: ---- ---- - -- ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS= 5" , 4 3/4 " Infor at{nn cont4ined herein is nit to he rr+nroduced,except in full,without prior authodzaG3n from this office. Construction inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting 6 X 12 CONCRETE= REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 Tigard,Oregon 97291 Test Methcd:: - __ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 07121 94 94-1566 Date Molded: - ---, 1A - Job No. Permit No: -- -- PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client _ - ---- -- ---- --- .. CO5TCO TIGARL� _.-PORE Project: _ — - — ---- --- — T]:GARD OR Address: — -- -- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: - -_- Sub Contractor. _- ------- --- - ---- LONE S1AR NORTHWEST 0`_ 2 214727 Concrete Supplies — --—Truck No ___—__-- —--Ticket No. _. H .P . MURPHY Cast By: -- --- ----_-Cu.Yds. -- •-1�J - - - -Load No. SUNNY - — SUNNY ?,? 66 Weather: --- _____Temp.High: Temp.Low: --- SLAB ON GRADE , GRIDS B TO C FROM TO 9 Location of Placement: ---- --- ----- ---- ---- 7 : 10 76 Test Time: - Concrete Temp. �e 3000 28 5 Streng'h Requirement: ----PSI 0 -----days Slump -.-- ---Cement Type 227 3/4 " Mix No./No.Sacks --- --Air Content --- --- Max.Aggregate ------ Admix.Amount: Brand: ----.Admix.Amount: Brand: ------- Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit Re ort Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load - PSI NPo_ By -- III 7 6140 07/22 07/2 79,022 28.31 2790 24 JB 28 6140 07/22 08/1 - 28 6140 07/22 08/1 cc :CITY OF TIGARD e0NtTRtJeTT0N Cle — ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS= 5" , 4 3/4" - t , Info;matlan corviskted herein Is not M be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from thin office. Construction Inspection 6 Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF b X 12 CONCRETE _-- TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 regon 97281 ASTM C172/CJ.231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 hone,03)684-346 Test Methods: -- — ----- - ---- Phone(5X#684-3460 FAX>r 684-0954 Date Molded: _ 07/21 , 19 94 . Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP ---------------- Client: _— — -- -- — — --" Project: COSTCO TIGARL STORE _--- _ -- TIGARD OR Address: -- — — ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION SubContrector. ----- contractor: .-- - ---- — -- - ---- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 108/262 214c:,92 Tax h No. ---.Ticket No. Concrete Supplier: --- — -- 2T7.�"JjJ� H.P . MURPHY 20/111 .5 ?_/11 Cast By: ------ - - ------- --- —Cu.Yds. -- -----Load No. _ — SUNNY 99 66 Weather: —. -- --Temp.High: Temp.Low: - SLAB ON GRADE , GRIDS D TO E FROM 3 TO 9 Location of Placement: -- - ---- --- 5:05/6: 10 75 Test Time: __ --Concrete Temp: .- - 3000 28 4 1/2" I SPPngtn Requirement: — PSI ® --_days Slump 4__3/4--Cement Type — -- 227 ,/4 „ IVIN No/flo.Sacks --Alr Content -- ------- Max.Aggregate -- Admix.Amount: _ Brand: ----__---Admix.Amount: _ — _--_—Brand: Set Test Register Drte Date Total Area Unit Report— Tested No. Days Number Rec'd Test Load _ — PSI_ No. _ By I 7 6142 07/22 07/2- 78,804 28.31 2780 23 JB — _ 28 6142 07/22 08/1f 28 6142 07/2 ..?. O8/1 -II '7 6141 07/22 07/21- 82,562 28.31 2920 23 JB 28 6141 07/22 08/1 28 6141 07/22 08/1 cc:,CITY OF TIGARD nPmarks: —_ KU U I ION Cu ADDITIONAL SLUMP InfoRrletl0rt 0or11eirred herein M not to be reproduced,except In full,withnut prior suthorizatlon from this office. Consttion Inspection & Related"Tests Carlson T�esting, Inc. rucGeotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684.3460 FAX 0 684.0954 July 20, 1994 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001. FIELD INSPEC`T'ION r(EPORT DATES COVERED: July 20, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 07-20-94: CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today's concrete pour of 1.80 yards. A.1.1 appears to be per plans and specifications . Limits of placement: 1. 611 floor slab on grade, Grids E to F, from 3 to 12 . 2 . Spread footings on 10 Line, from A to D. CTI representative also obtained samples, took slumps and temperature and cast two sets of (3) 6x12 test cylinders of pour. CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for 8" CMU grout pour. All appears to be per plans and specifications . Limits of placement: 1st 4 " lift Grids 6 to 12, on J Line and J to F on 12 Line, top out of wall on A Line, from 1 to 3. Also obtained sample arid cast one set of 1/2 block prisms of today's pour. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, wi-hout prior authorization from this office. If there are any farther questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully s bmit:ted, C L / 7ES G, INC. iglas Leach esident HPM/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. Construction Inspection & Relaters Tests Carlson Testing, Inca Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 8X8X 16 �'R 1 SMS ____TEST SPECIMENS P.G. Box 23814 97281 IJBC 24-26 P one(03)684 3460 Test Methods. — --- FAX q 684-0954 Date Molded: 07/20 19 94 . Job No, 94-1566 - Permit No: Client: __ PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP, Project: _ C05TCO TIGARD STORE Address: TIGARD OF: Contractor'. ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION GobContractor: NUGENT 111ASONRY — Concrete Supplier: ._ i-ONE STAR NORTHWEST _Truck No. _Ticket No. 207195 H .P . MURPHY Cyst By: —�-- _Cu.Yds. -- —_Loud Nr --- SUNNY 10.3 -i Weather: -- Temp.High: Temp.Low: ------ --_ 8" CMU WALLS , 1ST 'FT GR1DS 6 TO 12 urA J LiNF & ,T TO F ON I_rx;ation of Placement: __ - r , I. INl TOP OF WALL ON A LINE- FROM i 'TO 3 10' 10 7t, Concrete Temp: _ 1500 2B PLOWABLE r Strength Requirement PSI -- -- - -days Slurnp ._- Cement Ttr'pe 883 6 SACK 3/8 Mix No./No.Sacks Air Content -- -- Max.Aggregate — - Admix.Amount: --------Brand: _—Admix.Amount: ----Brand: _ — Set Test® Register Date DateTotal Area Unit Reppot Tested No. Days Number Rec'd Test - Load PSI No. By ' 61:36 07/21 07/2 85,693 58.14 1470 22 JB 0136 07/21 08/17 125,620 58.14 2160 52 JB 6136 07/21 08/17 127,990 58.14 2200 52 JB cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: RUCUU -- NUGENT MASCNRY ---- ----- —_-_- tntom,wMon cordeIned herein Is not to be rerw-Auced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. n� Construction: ln^pection & Related Tests Carlson resting, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 2.3814 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 97281 rest Methods: — Phone(503)684-3460 FAX Of 684-0954 Date Molded: _ - 07/20 __ t9 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNL.<SHIP Client: _ _ -- - - - ---- Project. COSTCO TIGARD STORE - TIGARD OR Address: — - RORIIVSON CONSTRUCT ION a��Contracw. Contractor: ---- - Ccncrete Supplier- _LONE STAR NORTHWEST Trui*No 52./266 Ticket No. I I .P . MURPHY Cu.Yds. 20/.I 4 7 .7 10 Cast By: _------._ ---- - Load No - SUNNY 103 64 Weather: -.— Temp.High: _ __... Ternp.Low SLAB ON GRADE , GRIDS E TO F FROM 3 TO 12 Location of Placement: 5:05/6:55 - 7� Test Time: --------Concrete Temp: 000 28 4 3/4 " I Strength Requirement: — —-- - - -- PSI days Slump �, — Cement Type - 227 3/4 „ Mix NoJNO.Sacks — Air Content --- —Max.Aggregate -- - Admix.Amount: — _ . ----- —_Brand: Admix.Amount: ___ _Brand: -- Set TestO Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load PSI No. By 1 7 6116 07/21 07/2- 82,463 28.38 291.0 21 JB 213 6116 071'. 0A/17 109,850 28.37 3870 51 JB 28 6116 07/21 08/1./ 112,690 28.37 3970 51 JB [I 7 (:)117 07,121 07/2 7 75,739 28.38 2670 21 JB 28 r;1.17 07121 08/" '? 107,180 28.37 3780 51 JB 28 6.117 07/21 03/1 107,440 28.37 3790 51 JB - r =CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: -R0: -- ADDITIONAL SLUMP TF-7STS == 5" , 1/4 " ,4 3/4 " Infomretlon corfthwd herein Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authors,atioo from this office. Carlson Testing, Inc. construction Inspection 61Zdated Tests Geotechnical Consulting 6X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS REPORT OF.__ _-- P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31./C39 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Test Methods: Phons(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 07/20 j 94 94-1561, Date Molded: — -, 19 Job No. - ----- Permit No: -- - -- PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client: COSTCO TIGARD ',TORE Project: - -- - - TIGARD OR Address: ---- -- - . ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: -- pub Contractor: --. -- ----- — Concrete Supplier: LONE STAR NORTHWEST Tn�cltNo _ 52 214557 /26t ---Ticket No. — H .P . MURPHY 20/147 .7'- 2/10 Cast By: _-- — Cu.Yds. .— —Load No. SUNNY 103 64 'heather: - -- -Temp.High: Temp.Low: -- SLAB ON GRADE , GRIDS E TO F FROM 3 TO 12 Location of Placement: - --- - --�_.--- 5:05/6:55 74 7t-, Test Time: — —Conrrete Temp: 00 20 4 3/4 " T Strength Requirement PSI a — --asys Slump 5„ _._Cement Type ----- 227 31111 " Mix No./No.Sacks Air Content ------ -- Max.Aggregate ---- ---- Admix.Amount: Brand: -Admix.Amount: Brand: Set TWO Register I Date Date Total Unit Report Tested No. Days Number I Reed Test Load Area PSI No. By -- I 7 6116 07/21 07/282,463 28.38 2910 21 JB 28 6116 07/21 08/1 28 6116 07/21 08/1 11 7 611.7 07/21 07127 75,739 28.38 2670 21 Jl3 2P 6117 07/21 08/1 28 61.17 07/21 08/1 cc:CITY OF TIGARD f7emarks: __ — -- ----- - ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS = 5" , 5 1/4" ,4 3/4 " Informallon conlIatr»d herein Is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. ��,r1soll Testing Inc Construction Inspect'- &Kelatta Tests �eotr�hnical Consulting REPORT OF BX8X 16 PRISMS TEST SPECIMENS — P.O. Box 23814 UBC 24-26 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: _ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: 07/20 _ 19 'a4 Job No. 94-1566 _ Permit No: --_-- ---------- Client: _ PRICE COSTCO C/O MUL_VANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE Address: - TIGARD OR— -- --- --- -- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION NUGENT MASONRY Contractor. — -.—_--Sub Contractor: ---•-•-- ---.._--- Concrete Supplier: LONE STAR NORTHWE L85 207195 Truck No. Ticket No. H .P . MURPHY Yds. -_7 --Load No.1 Cast By: - ---Cu. - SUNNY 1.0:1 614 weather: Temp.High: —_-Temp.Low: 8" CMU WALLS . 1.:�T 4FT , GRIDS 6 TO 12 ON 3 LINE. & 3 TO 1 ON I-ocation of Placement: --- 1 . 1. 1HE , TOP OF WALL. ON A LINE FROM 1. TO 3 10: 10 76 Test Time: ------ -----Concrete Temp: - 1500 28 Fl (�WAR!_I- T Strength Requirement: -- -- - PSI O ------days Slump Cement Type 883 6 SACK Mix No./No.Sacks - - Air Content --- - Max.Aggregate ------- ----- I "lx.Amount: ___—Brand: _.v-___ _—_Adrnix.Amount: —_Brand: - _- Set Test J Register Date Date Total Area Unit Re ort Tested No. Days Number Pec'd Test Load _ PSI No_ By 7 6136 07/21 07/2- 85,693 58.14 1470 22 JB 28 61-36 07/21 08/17 28 6136 07/211 08/1. cc-:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: -- T1VSII1�-L'DTIT�TRiT I TTiTI.-(.-0 --- -- --- _—.- NLKiEN`I' MASC INRY Information conE h- herein is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authodzatfon from this office. Construction Inspection& Related'leets Carlson Vesting, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX M 684-0954 July 18, 1994 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: July 16, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 07-16-94: CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today=s concrete pour. All appears to be per plans and specifications. Reminded Contractor to grease slip dowels in slab. Limits of placement (Pour #4) : 1. Floor slab on grade, H to J, from 3 to 12 . 2. Floor slab on grade, F to G, from 3 to 12 . 3 . Large freezer slab (#109 ) . 4 . Column pad footings #E/`i, D/5, E/7, D/6, E/4 and D/4 . Obtained samples, took slumps and cast six sets of 6x12 test cylinders of today 's pour, approximately 517 yards . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is no'.: to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there. are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this o�f.ice. Respectfully submitted, C SON TESTI G, INC. 'Doti'glas W. Leach Pi-6si.dent HPM/ecp CC! Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. Inc. onstruction Inspection& Related tests Carlson Testings nc• Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684.3460 July 1$, 1994 FAX 0 684-0954 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: July 15, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: B. Suminski #399 07-15-94: CTI representative inspected rebar at slab on rade, Lines A to B, from 1 to 3; 0. 5 to 1, from r--3- plinths' ine 12, from J to F; and footing D+8 . The bar was placed accords g to plans provided. Bolts were also (placed in the plinths d footings . A 3000 PSI concrete was placed. Concrete tests were performed and two sets of (3) cylinders were cast. Slumps were taken every 25 yards and were within specifications. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, FOULas SO /T TING INC. I W. Leach Pk sident BS/scp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Pa.r.tn?r_ship City of Tigard Robinson Co•istruction Co. Construction Inspection 6 Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting 8X8X16 PRISMS TEST SPECIMENS REPORT OF_ P.O. Box 23814 UBC 24-26 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: Phone(503)684-3460 FAX 0 684-0954 07/18 94 94-1.566 f)atn Molded: -- —. , 19--- Job No. -- _—. Permit No: .�-. — -- PRICE COSTCO C/O MOLVANNY PARTNERSHIP ---. --- COSTCO TIGARD STORE Project — — --- - - TIGARD OR Address: ---- — --- _ ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION NUGENT MASONRY Contractor: _ - -- --Sub Contractor: _ -- - LONE STAR NORTHWEST _TrurkNo. 101 Ticket No. 192012 ,,oncrete 9uppiier: ----- H .P. MURPHY 10 Cast fay: _ Cu.Yds _ - Load No. -- --- SUNNY 88 F,F{ Weather: _-- --Tsmp.High: 8" CMU WALLS , 1ST 4FT LIFT , GRInS 1 FROM G TO J( TOPOWT ) , J _ocation of Placement:FROM 1 TO 2( TGPOUT ) & J FROM 2 TO 6( 4FT ) AND A FROM 1 TO X 1ST 4FT ) — -------- 10: 35 76 ---Concrete Temp: - 5 8 Ft 0!loRLE I Strength Requirement: -- --- ---------PSI __ --days Slump ----Cement Type - 88:3 Mix NoAlo.Sacks ---Air Content --- ---- Max.Aggregate --- Admix.Amount: _----_ Prand: Admix.Amount: Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Read Test Load PS! No. By -- I 7 6084 07/19 07/2 78,970 53.38 1480 20 JB 2t3 6084 ---F07/19 O8/1 109,690 53.38 2060 49 JB 28 6084 07/19 08/1-51 111,990 53.38 2100 49 JB II 7 6085 07/19 07/25 55,630 39.76 1400 20 JB 28 6085 07/19 08/15 96,974 39.76 2.440 49 JB 28 6085 07/19 08/1 : 98,814"_' 39.76 2490 49 JB rr:� :rTTY OF TIGARD Rernarks: ----{ —�— NUGENT MASONRY I=GROUTED tnfrn TwAk)n cAntakod heroin Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE TEST;�PECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C143/C1064 /C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#664 0954 nate Molded. _ 07118 19---- Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client: ---- -- - -_ -- - - ----- COSTCO TIGARD STORE Protect --- TIGARD OR Address _. - -- --- -- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: ROBINSON Contractor. ---- — - --- LONE STAR NORTHWEST —Truck No 121/41 —Ticket No. 210879 Concrete Supplier: _ _ H .P . MURPHY 20/120 2/12 r;ast By: ---_ -- —Cu.Yds. »-Load N^- SUNNY 58 Weather: Temp High: Temp.'.ow: -- FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE Location of Placement: -- -- --- --- - 5:20/6:30 76 75 Test Time: — Concrete Temp: 3000 28 5 I Strength Requirement: -- - - PSI Q days Slump Sr-!.!. Cement Type 3/4 Mix No./No.Sacks _- ----- Air Content -- Max.Aggregate --- Admix.Amount Brand: ___ Admix.Amount: ------------Brand: - Set Test® Register Date Date Total AUnit Report Tested No. DayArea_s Number Rec'd Test Load PSI No. By 1 7 6,073 07/19 07/2 89,253 28.30 3150 18 JB 28 6073 07/19 08/1t 117,630 28.32 4150 48 JB 28 6073 07/19 o8/jE 120,900 2-8.32 4270 48 JB l .1 - 7 6072. 07/19 07/2 r - 97,097 28.30 3i31` 18 JB 28 6072. 07/19 08/'Ir 130,810 28.32 4620 48 JB 28 6072 07/19 08/1 126,930 28.32 4480 48 JB cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: MYSINSUN SUM — --- ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS = 4 1./2" , 4 3/4 " . InfnnTw* t cm its!wd herein Is mnt to be reproduced.except In full without pr,or authorization from this office. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson 'Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6 X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C 3.72/C 1231/C31/C39/C 1064/C 143 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Test Methods: _ -_ _ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: 07/18 ._' 19 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: �- PRICE C05TCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP - COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Address: ROaINSON CONSTRUCTION 7ontrector: -- pub Contractor: —.�— - -- -- --- LONE. STAR NORTHWEST _Truck No. _ -;�yt 0y: Ticket No. 210909 ,oncrete Supplier: -— }i .P . MURPHY --Cu.�_Cu.Yds. 210 _�� Load No.21 _�-_ _ SUNPJY - -- - emp.Hih g : F8 !leather: - ----- -- - T � FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE= -,c2tion ofPlacement: -- ------ -----— __--�--- ---- 'r _fest Time: __-.__concrete Temp: -- 3000 28 4 1/2 I Strength Requirement: - —PSI ® _ days Slump ---C9ment Type ---- 227 3/4 " Mir.No./No.Sacks Air Content - Max.Aggregate -- Admix.Amount: Stand: _Admix.Amount: ---_---Brand: — Set I Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested Na Oays Number Recd Test Load P51 _ No. By -TIS 7 6071 07/19 07/2 83,254 28.30 2940 19 JB 8 6071 07/19 08,'1, 111,130 28.32 3920 50 11B e--8 6071 01/19 08/1 119,620 28.32 4220 50 JB cc=CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: Informetien corfth W herein is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this of8co. Carlson rr�e►St111g Inc. c:ons.`ructicm Inspection & Related Tests Geotechnical Consulting REP�i(f OF 6 X 12 CONCRETE:: TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 rest Methods: ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C106o1/C143 - Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone 503' 684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Moic ed: _ 07118 19_ 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permh No: Client PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP _ — ------- --- - r'rojer.L -- CISTCO TIGARD STORE _. - TIGARD OR Address: -------— ------- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION __Sub Contractor: Contractor: �� — - -- - LONE STAR NORTHWEST 4<' -110909 Concrete 8!'pplier. __— -_Truck No. —_---.------_____--_--Ticket No. _--------__—_—� H .P . MURPHY 2 1(7 21 Cast By: - _ Cu.Yds. _- - -__Load No. _--- SUNNY fig 58 Weather: -- _ ---- __. _ Temp.High: .- .---------Temp.Low: FLUOR SLAB ON GRADE_ Location of Placement: -- —— ---- - - -- --- 7: 55 75 Test"rime: _ Concrete Temp: _- -`� 777 a 2 I Strength Requirement: ----PSI 0 _—__ - days Slump . —_Coment Type ---- 227 ?/4' Mix No./No.Sacks .- Alr Content ---- - --- Max. Aggregate Admix.Amount: -_----Brand: -_Admix.Amount. Set TestQRogister Date Date Total Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load — Area PSI No. Ry III 7 6071. 07/19 07/2. 83,-54 28.313 29to i9 JB 28 6071 07, 19 08/1. 213 6071 07/19 08, 1". (,(-: :CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: ----}?t3f3 ' ) tit. jjq Infonnatlon contained heroin Is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorize,ion from this odea. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotel nical Consulting 8X8X16 PRISMS REPORT OF _`TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 UBC 24-26 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: _ _— - -_—_--____ ___ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#6134-095,1 0713.8 94 94-5.566 Date Molded: , Job No. Permit No- 19— _--------------------- --._- -_ PPICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP - - - COSTCO TIGARD STORE Proinct: -- - --- -- -- ------ - - TIGARD OR Address: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION NUGENT MASONRY ';ortractor -- -- -Sub Contractor: _ -- - -- LONE STAR NORTHWEST Truckf�o. 101 -Ticket No. 192012 Concrete Supplier, _�_ --- — ` H .P . MUP?HY 10 1 Cast By: ------Cu.Yds. Load No. -----_ --- SUNNY 88 Weather: -- - - Temp.High: ---Temp.Low: H" CMU WALLS , 15T 4FT LIFT , GRIDS 1 FROM G TO J( TOPOUT ) , J ovation of Placement: - f RuM 1 10 7-( TOPOUT ) & J FROM 2 TO 6( 4FT ) AND A FROM 1 TO 3( 1ST 4FT ) ---- ---- ... 10: 35 76 _ Test Time: -----------___Cc,icrete Temp: 1500 28 FL.OWARLE Strength Requirement 0 ---- days Slump --- _ ---Cement Type 88:3 3/8" Mix No.No.Sacks — — AlrContent — -------- Max.Aggregate -- ----- Ad,nix.Amount: _ Brand: `_Admix.Amount: - Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test _ Load- _ PSI No. By T 7 6084 07/19 07/25 78,970 53.33 1480 20 JB - - 28 6084 07/19 0e,/1F, 6084 07/19 08/15 I1 J 7 6085 07/19 07/25 55,630 39.76 1400 20 JB --` 28 60135 07/3.9 08/15 -- 28 6085 07/19 013/1. _ cc. :CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: --- NUGFNT MASONRY I-GROUTED t ' Information ctv*fined herein Is not!n be reprooaced,except In full,without prior 8uih0rl7eti0n from this office. Construction Inspection & Rehited Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O.Box 23814 ASTM C172/C143/C1O64/C1231/C31/C39 Bone Oregon 97281 Test Methods: Phone(50.)fiB4-3460 FAX N 684-0954 Date Molded: — 07/18 . _' 19 'a4 Job No. - 94-1566 Permit No: --- PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client: —_- -- — - — Prosect: COSTCC, TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Address: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: -- — ----------Sub Contractor. •-- LONE STAR NORTHWEST —Truck No. _ 121/41 __�__ Ticket No. _�1 0879 Concrete Supplier. — - H.P . MURPHY —Cu.Yds. 20/120, —Load No.2/12 f_ Cast By: -- —-- SUNNY 88 58 Weather: __----—_ --.__ Tamp.High: Tomp Low: FI_OOR SLAB ON GRADE Location of Placement: — - 5:20/6:30 76 75 Test Time: —Concrete Temp: 3000 28 5" I Strength Requirement: days Slump -----Cement Type -� 22_7 :3/4 Mix N...!"rn.Sacks - --- - Air Content ----- Max.Aggregate ---.— Admix,Amount. _ grand: _—__--Admix.Amount: _ —Brand: Set Testm Register I Date Date Total Area Unit Report 1-ested No. Oays Number Recd Test Load PSI No. By I 7 6073 07/19 07/2 89,253 28.30 3150 18 313 28 6073 07/19 08/1 26 6073 07/19 08/1 II 7 6072 07/19 07/2. 97,097 28.30 3430 18 JB 28 6072 07/19 08/1. 28 6072 07/1.9 08/1 cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: — — ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS M 4 1/2" , 4 3/4" . Intnrmetlon cor>1elrnd vrein is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. Con:truetion Inspection & Related Tests Carlson. Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF �' X 12 CONCRETi TEST SPECIMM, P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231iC31/C39/C1064/C143 Tigard,Oregon 97281 rest Methods: -- —_ — Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 07/16 I)ate Molded: --- 19— Job No. 94;. b Permit No: - -——------ -- _- __ ----- PRICE COSTCO C/O MUI_VANNY PARTNERSHIP Ciient: - - ---- ---- ---- - - - -- - -- Project, COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Address; - �_- —� ------- -- _ ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: --- -----Sub Contractor: -�-- — --- - --- Concrete SuppCer: LONE STAR NORTHWEST -Truck No. _ 66/112 Ticket No. V-210856 H .P . MURPHY _Cu.Yds. _ 414/506 .75 load No. 41 /50 Cast By: — ..�� SUNNY Rj . 56 Weather -- — -- Temp.Hlgh: — Temp. Low: _ FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , POUR 444 , F TO G FROM 7 TO 12 & FOOTINGS Location-)f Placement: — — E/7 r.. D/(, 9:55/11 :45 75 74 TestTlme: .— Concrete Temp: 3000 ,t> i} 3/-' " T Strength Requirement. ---- PSI 0 days..:ump 5 1/411 Cement Type - -- 3/4 Mix No./No.Sacks ------ ---Air Content -------- Max.Aggregate -- Admix.Amount: _ Brand: - —Admix.Amoont: — Brand: - Set Test® ( Register Date Date Tonal Unit Re rt I Tested No. Days Number Reed Test Load Area PSI No. By 7 6036 07/18 07/2. 85,627 28.3tj 3020 17 JB 28 6036 07/18 08/1' 127,050 28.37 4480 46 JB 28 6036 07/18 08/11 131,740 28.37 4640 46 JB i 7 6037 07/18 07/2 81,101 28.311 2860 17 JB 28 6037 07/18 08/1.' 124,380 28.37 4380 4E JB 28 6037 07/18 OR/1. 12.5,610 28.37 4430 46 JB cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: ---- ---- - - -- - - --- -- ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS= 5" , 5" 1nfnrrtw 1M ywrMinoo;d herein Is not to be rem riuced,except In full,without prior authorization fmm this office. Inc. Com-truetion Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, nc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6 X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS --- P.O. Box 23814 TestMothods: ASTM C172/C1?_31/C31/C39/C1064/C143 ,_-- hone(03)on 972E I 6843461 FAX q 684-045,: Crate Molded: 07/16 ___' 19 94 Job No. 94--1566 - PennitNo: _. Client ___-_ PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Protect: COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Address: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTIONContractor. � - -- -Sub Contractor. - Concrete Supplier: LONE STAR NORTHWEST Truck No. _ 108/50 TlcketNo. - III-210827 IV-21.0842 Gist By H .P . MURPHY Cu.Yds. 211 .5/313 Load No. 21/31 SUNNY 85 56 Wnathec Temp.High: — Temp.Low: SLAB ON GRADE , POUR 04 , F TO G FROM 3 TO 7 & FOOTINGS E/5 & Location of Placemcnt: -- - b/5 7: 50/8: 50 74 76 -- ----_---------__. _Test Time: Concrete Temp: 28 Strength Requirement: --.- ---- -- - --- ----------- PSI -----days Slump5" -_ Cement Type '—_ 22/ Mix No./Nr.Sacks -. ------Air Content -- Max.Aggregate -------------. Admix.Amount: ____-. —Brand: -_-_Admix.Amount: ------- Brand: Get TeAO Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load PSI No. By 1 11 7 6034 )711 e 07/2 81,375 28.38 2870 16 JB 2.8 6034 07/18 08/1 139,620 28.39 4210 45 JB ?8 6034 07/18 08/1 17.1,640 28.39 4290 45 JB IV 7 6035 07/18 07/2 81,870 28.38 2890 16 JB ...8 6035 07/18 08/1' 123,590 28.39 4350 45 JB ?8 6035 07/18 08/1 123,000 28.39 4330 45 11B cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks- -- H01:5IN50N. UUN5 I RUC I ION CO ----------- ADDITIONAL SLUMPS - 4 1,12" , 5 114 " Infemtetlon contained hereln Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from th's office. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting .w•.w+� ��, w 6X12 TEST SPECIMENS REPORT OCONCRETE F P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31./C39 Tigard. Oregon 97281 Test Methods: �__ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX N 684-0954 Date Molded: _. 07/16 —,199^ Job No. . 94-1566 PetmitNo: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client: Project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE _ TIGARD OR Address: --- — - ROBINSON COW412UCTION Contractor: --.Sub Contractor: - Concrete Supplier: LONE STAR NORTHWEST __Truck No. — 108/63 Ticket No. 210807-1 . MURPHY Cu Yds. 10/1.20 Load No. `'/tom Cast BY: -- ---- — -- -- SUNNY 86 56 Weather: -- - - Temp.High: Temp.Low: ---. FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , POUR 04 , H TO J FROM 3 TO 12 & FOOTING5 t_ocation of Placement: — f 5:20/6:40 74 75 ---Concrete Temp: w�w�www.ww. 3000 28 � ' I stwngth Requirement: — PSI 0 --days Slump __ f, —Cement Type 227 3/4 „ Mix No./Na.Sacks -------- Air Content -- - Max.Aggregate _- - Admix.Amount: ----,--Brand: _— ___Admin.Amount --- Set Test® Register Date Date Total Unit Report 1 Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load Area PSI No. By T 7 6032 07118 0712 79,491 28.38 2800 15 JB El 6032 07/18 08/1 126,460 28.37 4460 44 JB 2.8 6032 07/18 08/1 128,840 28.37 4540 44 JB IT 7 6033 07/18 0712 85,034 28.38 3000 15 JB 28 6033 07/18 08/1: 130,310 28.37 4590 44 JB 6033 07/18 08/1 130,670 28.37 4610 44 JB cc:rITY OF TIGARD' Remnrlte: --770t3TMIIi ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS = 5 1/4" , 4 3/4" . LOADS ARRIVING ON JOBSITE @3"SLUMF' —" _UAc-STS _ RI;CY-- —---- inlomietlpn mmined herein Is not to be reproduced,except In full,v0hout prior auftrization from this office Carlson Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consultiny REPO OF 6 X 12 :ONCRE 7 E TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143Tigard, Oregon 97281 Test Methods: _._. Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: 00-11/16 , 19 94 Job No. 94-1566 PermItNo: -- - -- Client: ___ PRICE COSTCO C:/O MUl_VANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: COSTCO T IGARD STORE TIGARD OR _ Address: — ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: Concrete Supplier: _ LONE STAR NORTHWEST Truck No. 108/50 Ticket No. !_ I11�o�— Cast By: _ H .P . MURPHY -_Cu.Yde. •'] 1 -r. /313 Load No. 21/31__-------- SUNNI( 85 56 Weather: ___ --_ Temp.High: Temp.Low: `',LAB ON GRADE , POUR #4 , F TO G FROM TO / & FOOTINGS E/5 & Location of Placement: -- D/5 7: 50/8: 50 74 76 -- --Test Time: - -__ Concrete Temp: __-- ---- t )0O 3 c T Strength Requirement: -- --------- — PSI * —-- —days Slump -----------Cement Type ----. 227 3/4 " Mix No/No.Sacks --- Air Content —-- — --- --- Max.Aggregate — ---- Admix.Amount: Brand: —_—__-.-_Admix.Amount: ----- —Brand: -- Set TestO — Register Date Date Total Unit Report Tested No. Days Number RecdArea Test - —_Load _ PSI_ Npo. By 7 6034 07/18 07/2 81,375 28.38 2870 16 J3 28 6031 07/18 08/1 R 6034 07/18 08/1. I V 7 6035 07/18 07,'?_ 81,870 28.38 2890 16 JB 28 6035 07/10 08/1 28 6035 07/18, 08/1. 71 1 L cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: -- ADDITIONAL. SLUMPS = 4 1.12" , 5 1/4 " information orxvined herein Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from thi, office. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing? Inc. Geotechnaal Consulting REPCRTOF 6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Phone(503)Test Methods: _ FAX to 684-0954 07/16 911 94--1566 Date Molded: � 19 - Job No. Permh No: - -- - PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client: —_--- Project: -- ------- t:OSTCO TIGARD STORE — — — --- �"-- TIGARD OR Address: ------ - ------ — --- — — Contractor: — ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: - -- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 108/63 210807-I Concrete Supplier: ._ —_Truck No. --... —Ticket No. _Z���--- H .P . MURPHYcu.Yds. .__ 10/120 Load No, 2112 Cast By: — SUNNY 86 56, WfAther: — - — Temp.High: - Temp.Low: -- FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , POUR 04 , H TO J FROM 3 TO 1.2 & FOOTINGS Location of Placement: -- —-- - 5:20/6: ^0 74 7� —Test Time: — Concrete Ternp: _ ---- 3000 2>^ r_ „ I Strength Requirement: - PSI 0 ---- days Slump !-_--Cement Type ---- 227 3/4 Mix No./No.Sacks - —AirContent - Max.Aggregate ----- Admix.Amount: Brand: — Admix.Amount: --- - Erand: . _ — ---- Set Test Register Date Date l'otal Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Ree'd Test Load PSI No. By t 7 6032 07/1.8 07/2 79,491 28.38 2800 15 JB 28 6032 07/18 08/1 28 6032 07/1808/1 TI 7 6033 0`9/18 07/2• 85,034 28.38 3000 15 JB 26 6033 07/18 08/1. --� ..8 603:3 07/18 08/1 _ -- -- cc:CITY OF TIGARD nPmarks: 3011 17 -- -- ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS - 5 1/4 " , 4 3/4" . LOADS ARRIVING ON JOBSITE 03"SLUMP WATF-H A77CORDINGLY - Information oor.11oined Heroin is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authodzatton from this office. Construction Inspectu-:, b' Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6 X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 Tigard,Oregon 97281 lost Methods: Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: -- 07/16 , 18 ��4 Job No. 9,1-156(-, -- Permit No. Client: PRICE CGSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE . •-- -_--- __. ._. __. _ TIGARD OR Address: ----- _- — Sub Contractor. ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION _-_ ----..---__ --_ Concrete Supplier: LONE STAR NORTHWEST Truck No 66/112 Ticket No. _ V-210856 H .P . MURPHY 414/506 .75 41 /57 Cast 13Y _---------- _ Cu.Yds. -Load No. -_-_--__-_— TUNNY 86 56 Weathor _._. ___ —^Temp.High: _ Temp.Low: — FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , POUF #4 , F TO G FROM 7 TO 12. & FOOTINGS Location of Placement: — — 9:55/11 :45 75 74 Test Time: Concrete Temp: — 3000 '8 4 3/4" T Strength Requirement: PSI ® ------- ---days Slcmp c_ 1_flu—.-Cement Type 227 3/41, Mix No./No.Sacks ---- _ Air Content ----- Max.Aggregate — Admix.Amount: -__.__ Brand: ___ Admix.Amount: -- --. Brand: Set Test®— Register Date Date Total � Unit Repport Tested No. Days Number Rev'd Test Load Area PSI No. By -v 7 6036 07118 07/2 85,627 28.38 3020 17 �JB 28 6036 07/18 08/1 28 6036 07/18 08/1 VT 7 6037 07/18 07/2 81, 101 28.38 2860 17 JB 28 6037 07/18 08/1., 28 6037 07/18 O8 c:C :CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: — Z 1 v SCUMb I ROC! LUM l_Cl -- --- HDDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS= 5" i 5" Information contained herein Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. Constn_k!Uor. LiF.per_tion& Rclatc d I'!sts Carlson Testing, Inc. t.eatechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX 0 684.0954 July 15, 1994 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94- 0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: July 14, t994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: B. Suminski #399 07-14-94: CTI representative inspected rebar at the CMU wall Line 1, from A to C. 3 from 6 ' to 81 ; Line 1, from G to J, to 41 ; Line J, from 1 to 12; and Line 12 from H to J, to floor level. Horizontal bars needed to be placed at Line 1, from G to J, 450 bars needed to be adds:d at Line 1 and B and the slab dowels needed to be positioned properly. A 6 sack grout mix from Lonestar was pumped and mechanically consolidated. CTI representative asked Tom with Nugent to make up prisms for the next grout pour. Type N block was being used. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CA$ SONj ESTING, Nom. 1 D u as W. Leach P sident BS/ecp cc: Pride Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. NI spBGT�Op NOTA City of Tigard Building repartaent 13125 M Hall Blwd. Tigard, Oregon 97 3 Inspection Line (Roc-0-Phone): 639-4175 Business h : 639-4171 Inspections__ _—_ Footing Plbg. Underelab Msch. Rough-in Appr/sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL& Post/Beam struct. San. sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Mech. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Linn Gyp. Bd. Mech. late Requested& 1 S Time& AM PM Adlresst ���� i l y/I je)Ll Bulbar= IY� L I/�_—�l r J C THE FoLLoViNG CORRECTIONS ARA REQUIRED: As A c­ 1110,0-TA Inspector: Date: r -/-APPROVED DISAPPROVE[) _ APPRGVED SUBJRCT TO ABOVE Csll For Reinep. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson `resting, Inc. Ceotechnical Consulting R�PORT OF 6 X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMEN$ P.O. Box 2.3814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 -)ne,Or3 684-346 on 97201 Test Methods: _ ,_ _ P ane FAX ft 684-3460 AX ft 684-0954 Date Molded: 07/15 —119 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: Client: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP _�—... — --- - - COSTCO TIGARD STORE Project: . TI&iRo OR Address: _� -- — ----- --- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: -Sub Contractor: ------ -- — LONE STAR 114ORTHWEST 1.2�_ 210687 Concrete Supplier. Truck No. _____- -___- Ticket No. - B . 5UM I NSK I 1 C? - _.___ -Load No. 1 - Cast 8y: Cu.Yds.- --- - SUNNY H4 Weather: ---- _--Tamp.High: --_-- Temp.Low: SLAB ON GRADE LINE 1 8 F Location of Placement: _-. 7 30 a Test Time: ----.--Concrete Temp: _- -- 3000 28 i T Strength Requirement: - PSI Q days Slump --Cement Type --- .- 227 3/4' Mix No1No.Sacks -------- —Air Content -- Max Aggregate -- --- — Admix.Amour;: Brand: _.— Admix.Amount: Set Test Q Y I Register Date Date Total I BeUnit I Report Tested ra No. Days Number Rec'd Test Load — PSI No. By 11 7 6040 07/18 07/2, 88,396 28.31 31.2.0 14 JB 28 6040 07118 08/1. 129,420 28.36 4560 42 JB 8 6040 07/1 08/1 128,840 28.36 4540 42 JB cc:CITY OF TIGAPD Intermetw conEsfned herein is not to bn reproduced,oxcept In full,without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Inc.Carlson Testing, Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6 X 1.2. CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 Tiyard,Oregon 972a1 Test Methods: ___ ,-- Phone(503)684-3460 FAX N 684-0954 Date Molded: 07115 19 94 _ Job No. —9A-156F.' Permlt No: Client: PRICE COSTCO C/O MUL.VANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: . COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Address: _ -- ---- ROBINSON CONSTRUCT .TO�1 Contractor: ROBINSON Contractor: �-- - Concrete Supplier -LONE STAR NORTHWEST 104 191955 Truck No. _ _Ticket No. B . SUMINSKI 1.0 9 oast fay: _ _-- Cu. Yds. - — —Load No. SUNNY 84 55 Weather: --- - - -- --- Temp.High: ------_-Temp.Low. SLAB ON GRADE LINE 1 P D Location of Placement: --- — - --- --- - ---- -- 6:50 74 -_Test Tlme: _--__ - _-_Concrete (emp: - �� 3000 28 3.1 T Strength'1equiremert: _ PSI ® ---days Slump --_ _Cement Type 227 3/4 " Mix No./No.Sacks - Air Content _ _—_--- -. Me.,..Aggwyate -. Admix.Amount: --_Brand: -_W-_ --Admix.Amount: __.--__ _---Brand: - Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load PSI No. By 7 6039 07/18 07/2 83,254 28.31 2940 13 JB 28 6039 07/18 08/1 120,620 28.36 4250 41 JB :?R 6039 07/18 r)8/1, 125,570 28.36 4430 41 JB cr,:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: - - ---- _. - - - - - - - Inform th)n corrEsined herein is not to be reproduced,except In hill,without prior nuthoriiat,on from this office. Cstcti ► Inspection & Related 'rests arlscn TestingInc. Geotechnical Consulting 6 X 12 CONCRETE EPORT OF TEST SPE I�MENDS. - —� -- P.O. Box 23814 est Methods: ASTM C 172/C 1231/C31/C39/C 1064/C 143 �u� �_ Phone(03)684-3Oreon 481 60 FAX#684-0954 ate Molded: ` 071-'15 t9 94 Job No. 94--1566 Permit No: Ilent: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHT! 'roject: COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Add•ess: Sub Contractor: _ Contractor ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION_ .�. — LONE STAR NORTHWEST 104 191955 Concrete Supplier. Truck No. _ Tldtet No. _ _ Cast By: B • SUM I NSK I Cu.Yos. _____ 10 _.__Load No. 9 SUNNY 914 55 Weather: Temp,High: Temp.Low: SLAB ON GRADE LINE 1 & D Location of Placement: - — --- 6:50 74 Test Tl ne: Concrete Temp: 3000 28 r Sliength Requirement: ____ _ PSI 0 ______._____days Stump ___ Cement Type _ 227 3/4" Mix NoJNo.Socks —--- Air Content _ - Max.Aggregat,) Admix.Amount: __Brand: immix.Amount: ---Brand: Set Test Register Date Date Total Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load Area PSI No. By I 7 6039 07/18 07/2 83,254 28.31 2940 13 JB 23 6039 07/18 08/1 28 6039 07/18 08/1 CC:CITY OF TIGARD. Remarks: RUHIMJUN CONSIRIJUIMN Information conhMed herein is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this otfico. Gmstruction Inspection & Related Tests Inc.Carlson Testing, Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6 X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O.Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1.064/C143 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: � Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: ___ 07/15 '19 94 Joh No. 94-1566 Permit No: - ------ PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Gent: _ COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Address: — Sub Contractor: -- Contractor: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION--- .-- --- �---�--- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 122 210687 Concrete Supplier: _-Truck No. _—.Ticket No. —B . SUMINSKI Cu.Yds. _ 10----_--Load No. 11 Cast By: _. — `.TUNNY 84 65 Weather: --- Temp.Hiyh: —_Temp.Low: ----- SLAB ON GRADE LINE 1 & F Location of Placement: — _— _-- - 7:30 ?� --_—_--- Test Time: Concrete Temp: ---. :3000 28 3 112" 1 Strength Requlrement: — PSI ® ----days Slump -- Cement Type ----- - -- 227 _i/4 " Mix No./No. ' cks Air Content Max.Aggregate --- Admix.Amount: — Brand: Admix.Amount: ___ Brand: — Set Test® Register Date Date Total Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Roc'a Test Load Area PSI No. By II 7 6040 07/111 07/2 P9,396 28.31 3120 14 JB 28 6040 07/18 08/1 28 6040 07/18 08/1 e :CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: --_ --- — Information contidned herein Is not to be reproduead,except In full,without orlor authorization from this office. NS CTIONNn1'IC8 city or Tigard Building Departaent 13125 SO Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (ROC-0-Phone)t 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection: Pooting �Plbg. Underelab Mach. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Pound. Plug. Top Out Gas Lina PINALt Poet/seam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Mech. Rain Drain Insulation -plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line Gyp. Rd. -Mach. Date Rnquestedt — ' - 9- 1 imet v ♦ c' Address: a L;�-��Lt lent_ I RA Permit ft--��a(��, OV� 11 Builde,tl t .i lr L,, ) lam-LVt P`u—W1, ] 1 THE POLIAWINO OORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED, (p s7 Y- tie =' CQ lern Inspector:__ Datet5W _ lY'gROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT To ABOVE _Call For Reinsp. INSP19—CLION NOTYCE City of Tiga d Building Departanot 13125 8W Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 9- 7 Inspection: rooting Plbg. Underelab Mach. Rough-in Appr/&Wlk / a_\ Found. Plbg. Top Out Can Lina FINAL: Poet/Beam Strutt. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Poet/Beom Meth. Rain Drain Tneulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line Gyp. Bd. % Dale Requested:_ 11 LEO � Lk' Addraerv:� J _ Peroi `e C, _ O milder: THF FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE RRQUIREDi � -- ------ --- - - AAeul ir Inspector:__ Dater APPROVED DISAPPRO 77 _._._ APPROVED SUBJRCT nTD ABOVE .___Call For Reinap. Construction Inspection& Related Tests Carlson Testing, In.`,• G,-otechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-34C' FAX#684.0954 July 12, 1994 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: July 12 , 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 07-12-94: CTI representative made two site vis--us this date as follows: A.M. CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today's concrete pour of approximately 320 yards . Advised Contractor to watch clearances of rebar, grease slip rods (floor slab) and slough in footings and pads . Otherwise, all appears to be per plans and specifications . Limi-B of placement: 1 . Floor slab on grade ( 2nd pour) , Grid Line H to r;, E to F and C to D, from 1 to 3. 2 . Spread footings on J Line, from 3 to 12 . 3. Column pads at Grids 4/1-1, G and F; 5/1-1, G and F; and 7/H and G. Obtained samples every 100 yards, took slumps every 25 yards and cast four sets of. ( 3) 6x12 test cylinders . Slumps 4" to 5" , temperature from 72o to 76n . Concrete trucks coming on project with 3-4 " slumps and quality control with Lonestar monitoring slumps and adding water as necessary to not exceed 5" slump. P.M. CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar for today's grout pour. Also checked cleanliness of cells receiving grout. All appears to be per plans and specifications. Limits of placement: 1) 8" CMU wall from C4-11 to G on 1 Line, 8 ft. ` ift. (All rebar in place prior to grouting. ) 2.) 8" CMU wall from C+11 to B on 1 Line, 4 ft. lift. #94-1566 ,July 12, 1994 Page 2 of 2 3) 8" CMU 2 course foundation wall of tire shop. Mason used vibrator during pour. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTIN�, NC. Douglas . Leach President HPM/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnarship City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. INNMZ E ION NOTICE City or Tigard Building Departawmt 13125 M Ball Blvd. 'Tigard, Oregon 97723 d3S� J Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone)t 639-4175 Businana Phones i Inspection: Footing 'flbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in App=/sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Chit Can line F1XALj Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Hoch. Rain DraLr. Insulation _ply, Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line Gyp. Bd. _Hoch. Date Requested: T�l t PH Address: `f 0 pel�itt_ ���p Builder.t l cL.,L.t 1 ' I)CJ 'L V,) R- LVL TBR FOLLONINO CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: 439 5 I Inspector: pate: PPROVSD DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUB.TSCT TO Arkwa _—Call For Neinsp. Consh•uction Inspection &Related Pests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting ST SPECIMENS I+E_PO_RTOF 6 X 12 CONCRETE_. EP.O. Box 23814 — ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 Tigard,Oregon 97781 Test Methods: — Fhone(503)684.3460 FAX#684-0954 07/12 - i9 94 94-1566 Job No. Permit No: Date,Molded: �-- . -- ------- - PRICE COSTCO C. . MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client: COSTCO TIGARD STORE Project: TIGARD OR Address: -- -- ---- ---- -- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: Contractor: - ---------- - - LONE STAR NORTHWEST 50/51 210314-111 Concrete Supolier - Truck No. — _-Ticket No. 2 t 03#6—t-- H .P. MURPHY 210/310 21/31 Cast By: _ _--- --- --- —.Cu.Yds. _— --Load No. --- SUNNY 90 58 Weather: ---- Temp.High: FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , 2ND POUR , C TO D FROM 1 TO 3 , FOOTINGS ON Location of Placement: - J LINE FROM 3 TO 12 & COLUMN PADS 4/H, G & F „ 5/H , G & F AND 7/H & G . _ - — 8: 10/10:20 74 76 Time: — _ Concrete Temp: --- — �Ivvv 73 4- Strength Requirement: --- —-----PSI a -- days Slump 4'' Cement Type — 227 3/4 " Mix NolNo.Sacks -- Air Content - - — Max.Aggregate -.- ---- Admix.Amount: __ Brand: .__------Admix.Amount: ------Brand: Set Test® Register Data JDTotal Area Unit I Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Load — — PSI o. By III i 5978 07/13 , 294 28 . 29 3440 12 JB 28 5978 07/13 5,360 — 28.31 4780 38 JB 28 5978 07/13 08/0 137,910 28.31 4870 38 JB IV 75979 '07/13 07/1 93,803 28. 29 3320 12 JB 28 5979 07/13 08/0 134,570 28.31 4750 38 JB 28 5979 07/13 08/0 133,220 28.31 4710 38 JB cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remc:rks: — STRUCT-IEW e-&-- - ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS= 4 3/4" , 5" tnfnnrur}k)n mwvb*wrd herein Is not to be vearoduced,except In full,without prior eutttorizatton from this office. Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Nesting, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting 6X12 CONCRE-.E TEST SPECIMENS REPORT OF P.O. Box 23814 97213 1 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon -346 Test Methods: FAXX#684-00954954 ,.-___.——. -.— _ Phone(5 684-k 07/12 94 94-1566 Date Molded: ----- -- —, 19 — Job No. Pormit No: -- ---- --—-T — PRICE COSTCO C/O MUt-VANNY PARTNE=RSHIP - Client: - -- -- -- Prosect: -- COSTCO TIGARD STORE ----- TIGARD OR Addr3ss: ----- - ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: — pub Contract(. — -- - ------ LONE STAR NORTHWEST 123/84 210289 Concrete Supplier: _ — --Truck No. __— —_Ticket No. __— 10 vu H .P. MURPHY 20/1002/10—Load No. — - SUNNY 90 58 Weather: - -- Temp.High: —Temp.Low: FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , 2ND POUR , GRIDS H TO G , E TO F FORM 1 TO Location of Placement: 3. 5:15/6:20 72 72 Test Time: Concrete Temp: -- Strength Requirement: — PSI 0 ----- days Slump 5-"... Cement Type ----- 227 3/4 " Mix No.Mo.Secks Air Content --- Max.Aggregate -- Ad.rix.Amount: _ _ __ Brand: —Admix.Amount: ---- _Brand: — Set Test@ -- Register Date Date Total Area I unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load -- PSI No. By I 7 'i976 07/13 07/1 93, 142 28. 29 3290 11 JB 2E 5976 07/13 08/0 134,170 28.34 4730 37 JB 28 T 5976 07/13 08/0i 135,61.0 28.34 4790 37 J$ II 7 5977 07/13 07/1 95, 317 28. 29 3370 11 JB 28 5977 07/13 08/0 137,530 28.34 4850 37 is 2P _ 5977 07/13 08/0 133,690 28.34 4720 37 JB cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: r4sa f-eeNs-TAbTT11W CC -- ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS = 5" , 4 1 /2" imnrmetlnn r nnfok wd herein la not to he reproduced.except In full.without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical C.oaz:ulting 6X12 CONCRETE REPORT OF --__—__ TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: Phone(503)664-3460 -- FAX N 684-0954 07/12 94 94-1566 Date Molded: —_ _ 19 _ Job No. - Permit No: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client: - ------- -- - ---- ---- -- COSTCO TIGARD S1ORE Project: -- TIGARD OR Address: _^ - ------------ - - - --- ---------- -- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: - Sub Contractor: _---- ----__-_----___-----�----__ --- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 123/84 210289 Concrete Supplier: __—--_ _- -_ ._ Truck No. __—__-_______ Ticket No. _.___z I Q-79B-- H .P . 9B---_H .P . MURPHY Cu.Yds. 201100 Load No.2/10 Cast By: _— _— ---- — —---_— SUNNY 90 58 Weather. —__ — -- --- - -------Temp.High: _----Temp.I-ow: FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , 2ND POUR , GRIDS H TO G , E TO F FORM 1 TO Location of Placement: - --- ----- -- —--------------- - 3. 5: 15/6:20 72 72 Test Time: _ ______-. Concrete Temp: __--- -.- Strength Pequirement: _ _ ----PSI 0 z ---__days Slump 5" _- - -- Cement Type ------- 227 -- -227 3/4 " Mix No./No.Sacks - -- --Air Content - Max.Aggregate - Admix.Amount: __—Brand: .-------Admix.Amount: Brand: - Set Test® Register Date Date Total Unit: Re� pport Testod No. Days Number Rec'd Test Load Area PSI No. By I 7 5976 07/13 07/1 93, 142 28. 29 3290 11 JB 28 5976 07/13 08/0 20 5976 07,113 08/0 Ir 7 5977 07/13 07/1 95 , 317 28. 29 3370 11 JB 28 5977 07/13 08/0 28 5977 07/13 08/0 Cc-'CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: -----R9B�td98N- CONSTRUeTrILON CO - ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS = 5" , 4 1/2" info mstion ccar+U! lned herein is not to be reproduced,except in futi,without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting 6 X 12 CONCRETE REPORT tiF _—_ __-- TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: —_ ---- Phone(503)684-3460 FAX #684-0954 07/12 94 94-1566 Date Molded: ----- -- ---- 19..---- Job No. -- ___ Permit Nor ---_---- - -- --- -- PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client --- -- -- -- ----- - ---- --... _ - —------ COSTCO TIGARD STORE Project: — -------— - - ------------ ----------- --- - TIGARD OR Address: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: _ --.----— - - -- ---Sub Contractor: ---- --- -- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 50/51 210314-II1 Concrete Supplier: ____--------Truck No. -------Ticket No. _-_ --- H .P . MURPHY 210/310 21/31 Cast Py: _—_ - ------ Cu.Yds. ---- SUNNY 90 58 Weather: _ Temp.High: ------Temp.Low: ---- FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , 2ND POUR , C TO D FROM 1 TO 3 , FOOTINGS ON Location of Placement: --- -------- -- _ --- J LINE: FROM 3 TO 12 & COLUMN PADS 4/H , G & F , 5/H , G & F AND 7./H & G. 8: 10/10:20 74 76 Test Time: --- Concrete Temp: — 28 411 1 Strength Requirement: --.- -------- PSI ® - —days Slump 4.----- -Cement Type -_.--- 227 3/4" Mix NoJNo.Sacks ----- Alr Content ----- - Max.Aggregate — Admix.Amount: Brand: Admix Amount: Set Test Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days _ Number Ree'd Test _ Load — PSI No. By - -III 7 5978 07/13 07/1 97 , 294 28 , 29 3440 12 JB 28 5978 07/13 08/0 __ -- 28 5978 07/13 08/0 IV 7 5979 07/13 07/1 93, 803 28 . 29 3320 12 JB 28 5979 07/13 08/0 28 5979 07/13 08/0 cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: ---RFJB TNSOPI-�HIVSRF ��6P��$ ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTS= 4 3/4" , 5" Infor"mtion cm-&tIned herein is not to he reproduced,except In full,withnet prior authorization rc n thi.,office. =IRE IS)'YSTEMIS WEST. INC. 600 S. El MPRITIME AVE!,\'JE. SUITE .300 VANr,OJvFR. WA t r-;YDRAULIC CALC,�_:_.P7 IONS > POR f 0 owri Lu Q v COSTCO TIGqRD (TIRE AREA) 4c -j ko uj n w 0 ;:�ILE NUMBER: T >COSTIGI _j co Jul Il . 1994 4, DATE: a Z5 Ll 1[L 0 10, CL --DESIGN DPTA-- iic'CuPANCY EXTRA HAZARD GROUP 2 DEINS 1 TY: . 40 oom/sc. ft. AREA OF' APPLICATION: 2,01210 sn. ft. COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: 9(.'� so. ft. NUMPE'R 0M SPRINKLERS CAL-CULATED.- sorinklers TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED- 831 .6 c3orn T07AL wA-rE'R REGUIRED (inrludiren hose) - 1331. A- riorn FI-OW AND PRESSURE (t-P DOR) - 63*1:-. porn Rv 49. 1 SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE: . 64 irich NAME OF." CON�­RACTOR- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION DEST BN/LAYOUT BY: CHUCK Rf)PI TOY AQ7,'1'_joq, "7*Y HAVING JURK`SD rCTION �JPLAI'IN VALLEY FIRE & RESLUE N4UMF(;_=R- HASS DISK 413 E:PLCULAT.'- ONE-'3 BY ­,,4SS [,CjMc-,L_;,rER ORi1GRAM (LICENS ' fr Oc,,9158s: H.R8 SYSTEMS. ING. ATLANTA. 03A "Y'DRALIL-IC ANALYSIS Pace DA t e 3 07/07:199 4 COS7 I S 17 COSTC0 kTIRE= PREP) WATER Do-A A 1 C E 61 10. VAI L TOTAL REQ' .0 NODE PRESS. PRESS. 11, ::RESS. (it DEMAND P R E S,S. TOG 4S1 ) (-"SX (PSI) (r-.Pm) (PS.t s R C, 104. 0 18. 0 4608. 0 95. 3 1331 . 8 58.6'., AGGREGA'F-7- FLOW ANALYSIS). TOTAL FLOW W" S)O;.jRCL- 1 33.3i 0 G P M TO!"AL HOSE 1-33TRFAM' ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 0. 0 Gplyl OT"HER f--JOSE STREAM ALLOWAINCE-S, 500. 0 GPM TOTAL DISCHAR(SE PROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 8 31 . B OPM Nr)j)r ANALYS.T..g DATA NODE TAG EL.EVP'r.TnN NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHORGE (P.'T) (PSI) 1 24. 5 3:1 . 8 2 2,7. 0 30. 4 3 27. 0 2A. F, 4 C-17. 0 28. 27. x; 26. 2'7. 0 28. 1 7 27. 0 8. 0 27. 0 27. 8 10 2i . iR 28. 8 11 24. 5 31. 8 12 27. 0 30. 4 14 27. 0 28. 6 15 `7. 0 28. 4 16 27. 0 2-'8. 2 .17 27. 0 28. 1 iB 2-.7. 0 27. 9 119 27. V) 26. 8 - - - 20 0-` 27. 0 21 L_4. 31 . A 2 3 P7. 24 2 7. 0 28. 7 a. 5 26 27'. 0 28. 3 27 27. Q! 2H. 21 28 27. 0 26. 0 29 27. 0 2E:,. 9 30 25. 6 ... .... 27. 2 :31 24. 31" 8 32 P7. LA 30 4 33 27. 0 - - - - D9. 0 34 27. 0 28. 9 SPRTNKLER SYS', E'.% --YDRAULIC ANALYSIS Clarie Date- 217/07/1994 JOB TITLE: COSTCO T.TGARD (TIRE NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE F-`PESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) C S-3 I ) 34A 2 7. 0 7 27. 0 - - - - 25. 8 - - - --.. ;_7. 3 37 &R,4. Fj - - - -- 3.11. 8 38 27. 0 - - - - 30. 4 39 27. 11) - - - - 2'7. 1 40 25. 8 - 2r,7. 4 41 24. 5 - 31. IF.) - - - 42 42 27. 0 - 30. 4 4?; 27. 0 - 27. 2 44 25. 8 - 27. 4 45 24. 51 - - - - 31 . 8 - - - 46 ;-7. 0 - - - 30. 5 47 27. 0 - - - 27. 2 49 24. 5 - - - - 31. 9 - 50 27. 0 - - - - 30. 5 52 25. 8 - - - 27. 4 5c A 2518 - - - 27. 4. 53 24. 5 - - - 31 . 9 54 27. 0 30. 6 55 27. 171 27. 6 56 25. 8 - - - - 27. 8 57 24. 5 - - - 32. 0 58 27. 0 - - - 30. el 59 27. 0 - - - 27. 9 60 21. 8 - - - 28. 2 61 24. 5 - - - 32. 0 -- --- -- 62 2 7. 0 - - - - 30. 7 - 63 :27. 0 2P, G4 d,5. a - - - - 28. 65 24. 5 - 32. 1 66 .27. 0 - - - - 30. 8 67 27. 0 - - - - 28. 4 68 2.5. 8 - - - - A. 7 G 9 24. !--, - - - - 32. 2 '0 27. 0 - - - 30. 9 71 27. 0 - - - 28. 6 72 25. 8 - - - - 28. 9 73 24. 5 32. 3 74 27. 0 31. 0 75 27. 0' 28. 7 76 25. 8 - - - - 29. 1 77 24. 5 32. 4 7E ,_7. v7 31, I - - - '/9 '/9 2 7. CA 2'8. 9 FA at 24. 5 .32. 5 -. _. _.. 83 2. 5- 83 27. 0 29. 0 84 25. 8 29. 3 85 24. 5 32. 7 86 2 7. 0 3:1 . 3 Sf-IR.!1\4<LER F:)YSTE",! ANALYc_';!,-'- Paoe S Date: 0'7/07/199,4 'Tcls 71TLE: C(19'f*f..CJ '71(33ARD (TIRE AREA) !NDD=--" E L E.V A T.i L) NODE TYPE PRESSURE DIOCHAqC.:E (E T) (:.S I ) (Gphl) 87 2 7. %71 29. 0 89 24. 5 .3 2. 8 '91 27. 14) 29. 1 .91 29. 42 ::1 5. p 93 24. `f' 33. 0 - - -- 94 94 7. 0 31. 7 95 27. 0 29. 1 gf'.' 21!75. IS 4 97 24. 5 33. 1 98 c:7, 0 31. 8 99 27. 0 i?9. 1 .1.00 2S. a .29. 4 - - - lol 24. 5 37. 5 102 3 - - - 47. 7 1, 10 14. 7 2 2. i 7. 15 18. 9 112 17. 5 K=1i. 40 12. 4 40. 2 11:3 17. 5, K=.l 1. 40 11. 7 39. 1 114 i 7. 5 K=11. 40 11. 4 36. 5 115 17. Fj K=11. 40 11. 3 38. 4 ilG 17. F) K=11. 40 1i. 3 30. 4 .117 .17. 5 K=.11. 40 11. 4 38. 6 .118 17. S K=1 1. 40 II . B 39. 1 119 .17. 5 - - - - 13. 9 - - - 120 !4. 7 16. 6 14. 7 221. a 122 17. 5 19. 1 1013 17. 5 V,=11. 40 12. 6 40. 5 124 17. 5 K=1 1. 40 12. 0 39. 4 125 17. 5. A. 40 .11. 7 38. 9 126 17. 5 K=:1 1. 40 It I . 6 39. P 127 :17. 5 K=! 1. 4.0 11. 6 38. 8 i28 17. 5 K=11. 40 11 . 7 39. 0 129 17. 5 K=11. 40 12. 0 39. 5 14. 2 1' 5 131 14. 7 16. 9 132 14. 7 23. 7 133 A 7. 53 20. 0 - - - 134 17. 5 K=1 1. 410 13.. 4 41 . 8 1319 17. 5 .'<=I 1. 40 12. 8 40i. 7 136 17. 5 K=1 1. 40 12. 5 40� 3 .137 17. f 5) V,=11. 40 12. 4 40. 1 A 138 17. 5 K=11. 4k 12. 4 1313 17. 5 K=1 1. 40 12. F) 40. 4 140 .17. 5 K=! 1. 40 12. 9 4! . 0 14:1 17. 5 IS. 4 142 14. 7 19. 4 2 213, 234 14. 7 28. 13 - L1. 5 HO3E G"T'R I 49. 1 1 Ov,- vD 0.ka HOSE STREAM 49. 7 400.0 52. 6 SYSTiEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Pace 4 Date: 07/07/1994 JOB TITLE. COS*,r,Co 'rjGr4;iD (TIRE AREA) NODE 7AG ELEVAT ION NODE TYPE PRESSUM-E 1) (FT) (PSI ) C O. Z 56. 2 0 0. 0 61. 2 SRC B. 0 SOURCE 58. 6 1331. 6 El='R'iNi,L.ER SYSTEM HYrRALJL.Ii- c4 AL.Y;3IS Pace a 07/07/1'3`34 joB TI TLE: COSTCO TIGARD (TIRE AREA) PIPE DATA 1 PE' TPIP Q (GPM) DIA( IN) LENGTH PRE S3`3. EfvD ELEV. NOZ. PIT DISC. VEL (FPS) PW (C) (FT) Sl.ln. NDDE.13 (''SI ) (13PM) F. L. /FT (PSA ) ti'i oe: i 48. 0 El. .1 .15 PL- 3. 00 F'F 24. 5 0. 0 31. 8 0. 0 4. 4 A2-11 FTG T PE -1. 1 27. 0 0. 0 .30. 4 CO. 0 0. OL- TL 15. 00 Pk' 0. 1 ='i oe: 2 48. 0 227 C-'L 9Qi. 67 F-'F 1. 7 %7, 0 010 30. 4 0. 0 4. 0 12Q) P T G T PE iii.0 3 27. Vi 0. V) 2,e. E; 0. 0 0. 01 7 TL :102. 67 PV V1, i P i oe: 3 S. 0 2. 227 PL 10. 00 PF 0.c' 3 27. 0 0. 0 28. G 0. 0 4. 0 1 c 0 FTG - ---- PE 0. 0 4 27. 0 0. 0 ?8. 5 0. 0 0. 017 TL 10. 00 PV 0. 1. :i De S 4 48. 0 2. 227 PL 10. 00 PF 0. 2 4 ;_7. 0 0. 0 28. 5 Ill. 0 4. 0 i 2Vi FTG ----- PE 0.Vi 5 27. 0 0. 0 :-8. ?, 0. 0 0. 017 TL :10. 00 PV 0. 1 P i ne: 5 48. 0 2. 227 F'I_ 10. 00 PF' 0.E. 5 27. 0 k). 0 28. 3 0. 0 4. 0 1 c:0 FTG --- PE 0. 0 FS c_'7, V' 0. 0 2B. 1 0. 0 0. 017 TL 10. QT0 PV 0. 1 P:i.oe: 6 48. 0 i::. 227 PL 10. 00 PF 0. 2 6 27. V, 0. 0 28. 1 010 4. 0 !20 F'TG - -- PE 0.0 7 27. 0 0. 0 28. 0 0. 0 0. 01.7 TL 10. 00 FAV 0. 1 Pi n : 7 48. 0 2. C-27 PL 10. 00 PF 0.:: 7 c:7. 0 '),,. o 1_8. 0 0. Vi 4. 0 120 FTG ---- PE 0. 0 8 237. N Ji. 0 27. 8 0. 0 0. 017 TL 10. 00 PV 0. 1 r'ioe: 8 48. 0 2. 227 PI- 59. 33 PF 1. 2 8 27. Vi 0. 0 27. 8 0117, 4. 0 120 FTG T PE 0.V, 9 E:7. 0 0. 0 26. 6 0. 0 0, 017 TL 71 . 33 CIV 0. 1 P i oe: 9 48. 0 2. 115 PL 3. 00 PF 0» 3 .3 -7. V7 0» V� 26. E, 0. 0 4, 4 ='0 FTG T PE 5 10 21 . 0. Vi ��8. 8 0. 0 0. 022 TL 15. 00 PV 141. 14. D i oe: i q, el 1 6. 357 PI-. 10. 00 Pr= 0. 0 11 24. 5 21. 0 .'i. 8 0. 0 0. 5 1.20 PTO _ ..__ PE= Vt.Vi 1 24. :5 0. 0 31 8 0. 0 0. 000 "f 1- 10. 00 PV 0. 0 i'i oe: 11 46. 8 2. 1 .15 PL .3. 00 PP 0. 21, 11 1:1 0. 0 31 . 8 0. 12) 4. ,3 1 r_-'0 FTG 1 PE --i. 1 27, 0 0. 01 30. 4 0. 0 0. d�'c.'i i L_ 15. olzi PV 0. 1. i De.- 12 46. 8 2. 2 27 PL 90. 67' P:' , E :La 27. Vi 0. lb 30. 4 V1. 0 3. 9 i 20 -T�3 T PE: vi,Q'i 1 ,3 27. Q) 0. 0 28. 7 0. 0 0. 016 TL 102. 67 C'V 0, 1 P i oe: 13 46. 8 2. 227 CIL 1 te). 00 pF 0.c„ 13 :=7. 0 471. 0 as. 7 r. 0 3. 9 120 F TC-, _ --- PE 0. 0 :L4 27. 0 0. 0 28. 6 0. 0 0.016 TL 10. 00 PV 0. 1. SPzZlW<l-ER SYSTEM HYPRALY- TC ANPLYSIC-ii E Dat e: 07/0*7/.Iil'34 JC)B T17L-E, C-USTCO -r.IGARD (TIRE AREA) PIPE DATA co-,t PIPE TAG O (GPM) LENGTH END EL-EV. h\;nz. PIT DISC. VEL (FPS) HW (C) Ell 1.j NODES 00 (P Fj I) (G C,M. L.. /Fl- (�-Is I Pi oe: 14 46. 8 2. 227 PL 10. 00 Pr- 0.2 14 27. 0 0. 0 28. 6 0. 0 3. 9 120 FTG CIE 0. 0 15 27. 0 0. IZ 28. 4 0. 0 LA. 016 TL- 10. 00 PV 0. 1 pi0e: 15 46. 8 2. 2C-::7 PL- 10. 00 PF 0. :_ is 27. 0 0. Q) 28. 4 0. 0 3. 9 120 FTG PE 0. iz, 16 27. 0 0. 0 '8. 0. 0 0. 016 TL 10. 00 PV 0. 1 Pive: 16 46. 8 2. 2'27 PL 10. 00 PP 0.E, 1E 27. 0 0. 0 Ca. 0. 0 3. 9 120 FTG ---- PE 0. 0 17 27, 0 0. 0 28. 1 0. 0 0. 016 TL 10. 00 PV Pl oex- 17 46. 8 2. 227 Pi- 10. 00 CIP 0. 2 ! 7 2)7. 0 0. 0 28. 1 0. 0 3. 9 120 FTUPE C1. '6 18 27. 0 0110 27. 9 0. Q 0. 016 TL 10. 00 PV 0. 1 18 46. 8 2. 227 PL 59. 33 PF 1. 1. 18 27. 0 0. QA 27. 9 0. 0 3. 9 120 F:T'G T PE 0. 0 19 2-11. 0 0. 0 216. a 0. 0 0. 016 TL 71. 33 PV 0. i OR- : 19 4F. B 2. I 15 PL 3. 00 Pr 0. 3 19 27, 0 0. 0 ;=6. a 0. 0 4. 3 1'CIO FT G PE 0. 5 20 25. 8 0. 0 27. 0 0. 0 0. 021 TL 15. 00 PV 0, 1 PiOp: 20 316. 6 4. 352 PL 10. 00 PF 0. �-: 2-!Q1 25. 8 0. V) '7. 0 0. 0 6. 19 FTG 10 21 . 2 0. 0 28. 8 0. 0 0. O21 Tl- 10. 00 PV 0. PiDe: C.-I 1 94. 8 6. 357 Pl.. 10. 00 P;:7 0. 0 124.. '; 010 31. 8 lzf. 0 1 . 0 ).20 FTG PE 0. V, 11 24. 0. 0 31. 8 0. Q) 0. OVI0 T1.._ IV). 00 PV 0. 0 PiDe: 22 45. 9 2. 1 1 5 PL 3. 00 PF 0. 21 24. 15 0. 0 31 . 8 0. 0 4. 2 :120 FTG T PE -1. 1 2 2, 27, 0 0. 0 70� 4 0. 0 0. 020 TI- 15. 00 PV 0. 11'. P j ce. a'3, 45. 9 2. 227 P;... 90. 67 1. 6 22 27. 0 IA. 0 30. 4 0. 0 3. 8 120 F T C-3 T PE 0.V.., ). 0 .102. 67 23 27. 0 Q). 28. 8 o. ot5 Tt- 0. 1 Pico: 24 1,5.�. 9 2, C-2,7 PL 1Vs. 00 PF.' 0. 2' 0 3. A 1;::,0 FTG PE 0. 0 27, v7 0. 0 ;28. a 24 27. 0 q;. )71 2 S. 7 0 171.0 15, TL 1 Q,. 00 PV LA. I Picea 25 45, '1 2,; 7 DL 10, 00 0. 24 27. 0 v1. 0 28. 7 0. 0, 3. 8 80 PTG ---•-• PE 0,0; 25 27. 0 0. 0 2-6. 5 Z. 0 0. 015 T;- 10. 00 PV 0. 1 PiDet 26 45. `3 2. 227 PL 10. 00 PP' 0 25 217. 0 0. L71 28. ` 0. 0 3. 8 120 FTG ---- PE 0. 0 26 27. 0 0. 0 28. 3 010 LA.CAI 7:p Tl- 10. 00 PV 0. 11. SPRINKLER SYSTE,'Y; - '-;-)RAUiAC ANAL-YIS)1!") 7 Date: 0"1 073 9 9 4 JOB COSTCO TIGARD (T.TRE AREW PIPE D,A 7A (rol"t. pip,;:. rpG O (GLIM) DIA( IN) LEAf2,­--- "'RESS. END L E.V NOZ. P, DISC. VE.- (FPS) HW (C) T SUfr. N CJ D E S (F:T) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F. L. /FT ( 'SI ) Pioe: .T'7 45. 9 2. 22 7 PL 10. 00 PCA 26 27. 0 o. 0 2,8. 3 0. 0 3. 6 120 F r, PE 0. 0 27 27. 0 0. 0 28. 2 0. 0 0. 015 TL 10. 00 PV 0. 1. pioe: 28 45. 9 - E 27 PIL 10. 00 PP 0112 R 7. 0 3. 8 12 ZI FTG -- PF 27 2 0. vi 28. 2 V1. 0 - 0.0 28 27. 0 0. 0 28. Ql 0. 10 0. 0'.5 TL 10. 00 ='V 0. 1 Pioe: 29 45j, -3 2, ic-27 PL 59. 33 PP 1. 1 28 27. 0 0. 0 EB. 0 0. 0 3. 8 120 FTG T PE 0. 0 29 27. 0 0. 0 26. 9 0. 0 0. 015 TL 71. 33 PV 0. 1 Pi or-: 30 45. 9 2. 115 PL- 3. 00 P;:* 0. 3 29 *27. 0 0. 0 26. 9 0. 0 4. P 120 FTG T PE 0. E.; 30 5. S 0. 0 27. 2 0. 0 0. 020 TL 15. 00 PV 0. 1 ' P i oe: 3.1 '::69. 8 4. 352 PL 10. v -)0 p�-: 0. 30 25. 8 0. 0 27. 2 0. 0 5. a 120 FTG PE ql. 0 20 25. a 0. 0 27. 0 0. 0 0. 016 TL 10. 00 0V 0.2 pi 3,:-:, 140. 7 6. 3 5,7 PL., 10. 00 PF 0. 0 31 24. 5 0. vi 31. 8 0. 0 1 . 4 120 FTG ------------ PE 0.Q.,l al 24. 3 0. 0 31 . 8 0. 0 0. 00 1 TL 10. 00 PV 0. 0 P i 33 43. 3 2. 115 PL 3. 00 PF 0. 3 31 c4. 5 0. 0 31 , 8 0. 0 4. 0 1,-_'V FTC 3 T PE -1. 1 32 27. vi 0. 0 :30. 4 0. 0 0. 018 TL 15. 00 PV 0. 1. Pioes 34 43. 3 2. 2127 PL- 90. 67 PIF 1. 4 32 27.0 0. 0 30. 4 0. 0 3. 6 120 FTG F PE 0.0 .33 27. 0 0. 0 c'9. 0 0. 0 0. 2 Al 4 TL 102. 67 PV 0. 1 PiDe: 35 43. 3 2. P27 PL 10. 00 PF 0. 1 33 'A.27. 0 0. Q) 29. 1111 0. 0 3. 6 A 2 0 F TG E L 0 34 27. 0 0. 0 28. 9 0. V, Vi. 014 TL 10. 00 PV 0. 1. Pli oe: 35A 473. 3 2,. 2 '7 PL 10. 00 PIP' 0. 1 34 27. 0 0. 0 26. 9 0. 2) 3. 6 120 FTO ----•-- PE 0.0 34A 2'7. 0 0. 0 28. 7 0. 0 0. 01.4 TL. 10. 00 DV 0. 1 36 43. 3 2. 227 PL 87. .3: OF 1. 7 34A 2 7. 0 0. 0 26,. 7 0. 0 3. E 12:0 F:TG 4ET PE 0. V, 35 2,7. V1 0. 0 27. 0 IZI. Q1 0. 014 TL 123. :33 PV Qi. 3. -1, Pi )e- 37 43. 3 115 CIL. :6. 012 PC 0. 3 35 27. 0 0. 0 E7. 0 ICS. Q 4. it! 120 ;:*TG T PE 0.53 36 IR 5. A 0. 0 27. 13 0. 0 x,. 018 ,L. IS. 00i PV 0. 1 ploe: 39 2 2,3. 9 li. 352 OL 10. 01 Pir @. .I,, 36 25. 0. V) 2,7. 3, 0. 0 4. R 120 FTB 0. 0 30 8 0. 0 E--'7. 2 0. 0 0. 011 TL 10. 00 DV 0.e. SPRINKLER SY97'Elyl HYI)RP!-i:-IC 8 Date- 07/07/1 94 JOB 71TLE: COSTCO TIGARD (7(RE AREA) PIPE D(-'rA (cc-lnt. PIPE -A)G 01 (f-33PIM) DIP( lk') LENr�TH PRESS. END E V NOZ. P, L)lf-:)C. VEL (PPS) H*W(C) (F"- IS(j If,. N C)D E.S (:7 T) (PSI ) (GPM) /F-7 (PSI OiLie: 39 184. Q. G. 357 DL 1 0. 0 lb PF: 0.17.1 37 24. 5 0. 0 31 . 8 0. 0 1. 9 12,0 FTG 0. 0 31 24. 5 0. 0 3i. 8 0. 0 Ci. OQA! Ti- 10. 00 PV 0.Q) 9,i oe: 40 43. 4 2. 115 OL 3. 00 PF 0. 3 37 24.5 0. 0 3 i. S 0. 0 4. 0 120 FTG T PE --1. 1 36 27. 0 0. 0 ".."o. Irl. 0. vi 0. 018 TL 15. 00 :IV 0. 1 Pioe: 41 43. 4 227 P L 192'. SIT Pt" 3.Ll. 38 27. 0 0. 0 30. 4 0. 0 3. E*1 120 FTG 4ERT 'PE 0. 0 39 27. 0 0. 0 27. i 0. 0 0. 014 7L 240. 00 PV 0. 1. PiDe: 42 43. 4 115 PL 00 P;- 0. 3 39 27. 0 Q+. 1TT P E 0.0 :-TG 7. 1 0. 0 4. 0 12 40 2:5. a 0. 0 i-::'7. 4 0. 0 0. 018 TL 15. 00 PV 0. 1 PiDe: 43 180. 6 4. 352 C:L 10. 00 PF 0. 1 40 25. 8 0. 0 27. 4 0. 0 3. 9 12:'0 ^TG of 0. 0 36 25. 8 0. q, 27. 3 0. 0 0. 00*7 TL 10. 00 PPV 0. 1. Piop- .- h4 2 C-:.'7, Fj 6. 357 "L 10. 00 PF 0. 0 41 24. 5 0. CA 31. 8 0.0 E. 3 120 FTG PE 0.17.1 37 24. S 0. 0 31 . 8 0. 0 0. 002 TL 10. 00 PV 0. 0 PiDe: 45 45. 6 1 15 PL 3. 00 PF 0.3 2. 4� 5 0. 0 120 F,r*B T PE --I . i 41 .�l . 8 0. 0 J.�� ;..- 42 27. 0 0. 0 3 kD. 4 0. 0 0. 020 TL 15. 00 PV 0. Pioe: 4F_, 45. Fj 2. 227 PL .190. 00 PIF 3. 3 42 27. 0 IT. lzi 30. 4 0. 0 3. 8 120 F70 2'T PE E 0.vi 43 27. 0 0. o .7. 2 0. 0 0. 0.15 TL 214. 00 DV 0. 1 Pioe: 47 4E'.. E, c 1 15 OL 3. 00 P= (A. 3 43 27. 0 0. 0 c:7. *2, 0. 0 4. iR I c'_0 r7TB IF PE 0. 5 44 25. a 0. lb 2,7. 4 0. 0 0. 020 TL IS. 00 PV IZI. I P:i ne: 4 F2 1:37. ::' 4. 352 L 10. vio PF 0. 0 44 25. 63 0. 0 27. 4 0.lb 3. 0 1210 F TG PE 0.0 40 25. 8 0. 0 27. 4 0. 0 0. 004 7L I VI. 00. PV 0. - Pioe: 49 273. 1 6. 357 PL 10. 100 Or- 0.0 .A. 5 0. 0 -2111, 19 2. A I;:-:,0 0. 0 45 Q). 0 - 41 4. 3 LA. IZI 3, . 8 0. 0 0. 003 TL 10. OIZ, PV 0. 1. pioal q 1 45. 7 r'R. 115 OL. 3. 1/3 v) p 0. 3 45 4. 5 010 3- 8 0, it 4. 2 120 =TG 7 PE --! , i 46 7. 0 IT. 0 230. 5 0. 0 T. 020 TL 15. 00 � V 0. i pirle: 51 45. 7 2. 2,:'7 PL 1910. 00 ;:,F 3. 3 46 27. 10 0. 0 30. 5 0. 0 3. 6 120 FTG 2*1PE 0. 0 47 2 7 C. 0. 0 217. 2 0. 0 lb. 015 TL 214. 00 PV 0. 1 SPRINK-iER SYS-l"EM HYDRAULIC ANAL.YSIS 9 Date 07/07/i,394 JOB TITLE: COSTCO TIGARD C-.-RE PR-Fg-)) PIPE DATA (coat. ) PIPE 'FAG DIA( IN) LEi'14GTH ORESS. END ELEV. NOZ. DISC. VE7L- (FP,c,,) HW (C) (F--T) SLityl. NO'.)E (FT) (K) (P'S 5' ) (r IPM) F. L. /;::'T (ps,c ), Pile: 52 45. 7 2. 1 1 r---- P- 3. 00 PP 0. .s 47 27. 0 0. 0 ;:-:,7. D 10. 0 4. ;.R 120 FTG T PE 0. 5 48 25. 8 0. 0 27. 4 0. 0 0. 020 TL- 15. 00 PV 0. 1 Pioe: 53 91. 5 4. 352' PL- 10. 00 PF 0. 0 48 25. 8 0. 0 27. i 0.0 2. Z 120 FTG PE 0.k1l 44 25. a 0. 0 iR7. 0. 0 0. 002 TL 10. 0 vi PV 0. 0 P i oe- 54 31.8. 7 6. 357 PL 10. 00 PF 0.Vi 49 24. 5 0. 0 31. 9 0. 0 3. 120 FTG ---- PE 0. 0 45 24. 5 0. 0 31 . 6 0, 0 0. 003 TL 10. 00 PV 0, I. Di oe: 5S) 45. 8 2. 115 Pi-. 3. 00 PF 0. 31 49 24. cli 0. 0 31. 9 0. 0 4. 2 120 FTG T PE 5S! 27. 0 0. 0 30. 5 0. 0 o. oi=,o TI..- IS. 00 CIV 0. 1 P i oe: 56 45. 8 2. 227 P[- i 90. 00 PF 3.3 50 27. V, 0. 0 30. 5 0. 0 3. 13 .10:0 FTG 2T PE 0. 0 1 27. 0 0. 0 27. 2 0. 0 0, 015 Tl- 214. 00 PV 0. 1 Pli o e- 5-7 45. 8 _. 1 .15 PL 00 PF 0. 3 `31 27. 0 0. 0 27. 2 0. 0 4. 2 120 FTG T PE 0. El'i 52 25. 8 0. 0 27. 4 0. 0 0. 020 TL :15. 00 PV 0. 1 Pioe: 58 45. 9 4, 352 PL 10. 00 Pr' 0.Ql - 52 25. 8 0. 0 27. 4 0. v 1. 0 12,0 FTC, ------ PF 0. 0 48 25. 8 0. 0 27. 4 0. 0 0. 001 1-1- IV). 00 PV 0,01 Pi rie.- 58A --0. 8 4. 352' PL. 1. 50 PF 0. 0 5 2 25. 8 0. 0 27. 4 0.0 0. 0 120 'r-?"C3 ---- PE 0.V11 52:A 25. 8 0. V) :7. 4 Vj. 0 0. 000 TL- 1. 50 PV 0. 0 Pioe: 59 3f-.,4. 6 6, 3S7 PL 10. 00 PF 0.0 53 24. 3 0. 0 31 . 1 0. 0 3. 7 1;=0 FTG ---- PE 0. 0 49 24. 5 V). it) .11 . 9 0. 0 0. 0104 TL 10. 027, PV 0. 1. 0J.'3e. 60 43. 4 2. 115 PL 3. 00 OF 0. 3 53 24. S 0. 0 .31 . 9 0. Y) 4. 0 120 FTG PE -1 . 1 54 27. 12 0. 0 30. 6 0. 0 0. 01 8 TL 15. 00 PV 0. 1 Pioet 61 43. 4 E. 227 PL 190. 00 PF V., 54 27, 0 0. 0 3 CA. F, 0. 0 '31. 6 120 F'f*(3 - PE 0, 0 55 27. 0 0. 0 27. fF k!, 0 0. 014 TL- 2,14. 00 PV 0. ). -,:i op- 62 4,s. 4 21. 115 PL. 3. 00 -7,F 0. 3 27. 0 0, k! E7. F� IZI, t� 4. (1) 120 FTC PE E; .4 li,S. S 0. lb '7.. 6 ILI. fil 0. 018 `L 15., 00 PV Vi. 63 '-+(::1. 17, 4. 352 PL- 9. SO PF' 56 25. 8 0. 0 87. 8 0. 0 .1 vi. A 120 FTG ---- PE 0. 0 52A 25. 8 0. 0 27. 4 0. 0 0. 043 TL 9. 50 PV 0. 7 - -- - -- I SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC A.NlAi._YE:i S ?,ane 10 DAte: 07/07/1994 JOB TITLE: COSTCO T IGARD ("r.irk, AREA) PIPE DATA (cont. ) PIPS TAG C ([P'M) DIA(IN) !rTNC=,TH PRESS. END ELEV, NCJZ. 1:'T JTSC. VE.- (FPS) HW (C) (FT) SUN. NODES (F > (K') (PSI ) (G�'-'M) F. k_. /F- (PSI) P i oe: 64 408. 0 6, 357 GL 10. 00 PF 0. 1 57 24. J 0. 0 32. IC's 0. 0 4. 1 1 c:'0 '='i"G ---- r F 0. 0 33 L'_4. 5- 0. O 31. 9 0. 0 k: d10- TL_ 10. 00 PV O, i. P11 op: 65 41. 3 2. 115 Pi_.. 3. 00 0. 2 57 24. 5 0. 0 32. 0 V:1. Qi . 13 120 i=TCS 1- DE na r_'7. v7 0. 0 3�i. 6 0. O O. 016 T�_. t 5. 00 �'V 0. 1 Pi DP: 66 4i. 3 2. 2127 PL 190. 00 PF c'.7 5A 27. 0 0. 0 30. 6 0. 0 3. 1:a0 FTG 27' PE 0. 0 59 .2-7. 0 0. 0 ;17. 9 0. @ 0. 013 Tl_ 14. 00 P'V 0-1. Pi Dry: Fit 41. 3 2, 1 1 5 PL. 3. 00 PF 0. 2 59 27. O 0. 0 c:7. 9 Vi. V1 3. 8 120 1=T1_ T PE 0.5 60 25. 8 0. 0 ;=8. 2 �T.. iT 0. 016 -FL 151, 0vl PV 0. 1 Pi De: 68 423. 6 4. 352 PL i0. 00 PF O.A. 60 25. 8 0. 0 2 8. 0. 0 9. :t 120 FT13 ---- DE 0. 0 56 25. 8 k7j. O 27. 8 O. 0 0. 036 TL 10. 00 PV 0.6 Pi De: 69 449. 4 6. 357 PL. IV). 00 PF 0. 1 2-,4. 5 0. 0 32. 0 0.0 4. 5 120 F'rt; -- __ PE 0. Vi 57 : 4. `� 0. O 32. 0 0. 0 0. 006 TL 10. 00 PV 0. 1 Pi DP: 70 39. 7 2. 115 PL 3. 00 PG 0.c 61 24. 5 0. 0 3;.', N 12i. 0 3. 6 1;,0 FTG T DE -1. 1 62 27, O 0. 0 30. 1 Vi. 11) 0. 01`, Tl- 15. Oili PV 0. 1 Pi oe: 71 _9. 7 2. 227 }'L. :190. 00 Pc r'. 5 62 27. 0 0. 0 30. '7 0. V_, _, 3 120 FTG 21- PE v7.IF, 63 27. 0 0. it 28. 2 0. O 0. 012 1l_ c 14. 00 GV 0. 1 P i oe: 72 39. 7 2. 1 15 PL 3. 00 PF 0,2 (313 --''7. O 0. 8. 2 v1. 0 3. 6 120 FT'G T PE 0. 5 64 25. A 0. 0 28. 5 0. 111 0. 013 TL 15. 00 CV 0. ,i. PiDp: 77 Es ., 3 4. 35__ PIL 10. 00 PF. 64 25, 8 O. IA 28. 5 'T. V) 8. 2 120 FTG - - _ PE V" 60 2`5. 8 v7. O 28.2 0. 0 0. 030 �I_ :10, 00 t'V 0. 5 PiDe: 74 0 6. 357 PL 10. 00 i, 0. 1. 6,'� . 4, ;J v�. V_� ,r_', 1 O. v3 ::F. 1.) 1E,0 FTU -__- 0. 0 61 24. ` Z�. V, s: . 0 0. 0 A. 007 TL- 10. 00 ;:"V 0. ., Pi oe: 75 .38. 4 2. 1 15 PL. 3. 00• �'F 0. : C35 24. 5 Vi. ti,'. I k1. V• _. 5 1.20 r`TG T ;:,E - 1 . 6E ; 7. 0 0. 0 .30. H 0. 0 0. 014 "rL 15. 00 =.V 0. .1 p i ee: 76 ;313. 4 2. 22-7 PL :.90. 00 PP ••�. 6E, c,7. 0 0. 0 ,20. 8 0. 0 =;. ;.-" 12= FTG cT PE 0. 0 67 27. 0 0. 0 28. 4 0. 0 0. 011 TL 214. 00 PV 0. 1. `;DRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANAi...YSIS Pacle 11 Date: 07/07/1rv94 JOB TITLE: C091'CC) '-','13F)RD (TIRE AREA) PIPE DATA (r_c,rit. pli:,E: TAC O(GPM) DIA( IN) LENGTH PREFaG. END ELEV. '�'i.i7. OT DISC. VEL (FPS) HW(C) (FT) SLR'. NODES (FT) (r() (PSI ) ((3pIrl) F. L. /FT (PS.1 Pipe: 77 38. 4 2. 1 15 Pi_ 3. 00 P!= 67 27. 0 0. 0 28. 4 0. 0 .3. ) 120 FTG T PE 0. 5 68 25. 8 0. 0 28. 7 0. 0 0. 014 TL 15. 00 PV 0. :i. Pi oe: 78 342. 6 4. 352 PL 10. 00 PF:- 0. 2 68 25.8 0. 0 28. 7 0. 0 7. 4 120 FTG ---- PE 0.Q'F 64 25. 8 0. 0 J.,a. `i 0. 0 0. 024 TL 10. 00 PV 0. 4 Pipe: 79 5J=7. 5 6. 357 PL 10. 00 PF 0. :i 69 24. 5 0. 0 32. ` 0. 0 5. 3 .1:'0 F'fG --- PE 0. 0 65 x'4. 5 0. 0 32. 1 0. 0 0. 009 1'L 10. 00 PV 0. Pipe: 80 37. 6 2. 1 .15 PL_ 3. 00 PF 0. 2 69 24. 5 0. 0 32. 2 0. 0 3. 4 120 FTG T PE - i. ':. 70 27. 0 0. 0 :50. 9 0. 0 0, 014 TL 15. 00 PV 0. i e Pipe: 81 37. 6 2. 227 PL 190. 00 PF 2, 3 70 27. 0 0. 0 30. 9 0. 0 3. 1 .1;R0 FTG 2T PE %'. 0 '71 27. 0 0. 0 28. 6 0. 0 0, 011 Ti- 21 ':. 00 PV v,. 1 Pi pP: 82 :57. 6 1155 Pl_ 2,. 00 PF 0. 2 71 27. 0 0. 0 28. 6 0. FT 3. 4 120 FTG T PE 0. 72 25. 8 0. 0 28. 9 0. V1 O. 014 TL. 15. 00 DV 0. 1 Pipe: 83 304. 1 4. 352 ?L 10. 00 PF 01.;-::' 72 5. 8 0. 0 218. 9 0. 0 F,. 6 .1L7 FTG ---- 4'E 0. 0 68 25. a 0. 0 28. 7 0. 0 0. 020 TL 10. 00 PV 0+. 3 Pipe: 84 5E,S. 1 F- 357 PL 10. 00 P= 0. 1 73 24. 5 0. 0 .32. 3 0. 0 5. 7 120 FTG ---- r'` 0.01 69 24. 5 0. 0 :32. 2 0. 0 0. 010 TL 10. 00 ='V 0. Pipe: 85 35. 4 21. 1 15 P!- 3. 00 PF 0. 73 24. 5 0. 0 321. 31 0. 0 .:3. 2, 12,0 FTG T PE -4 . 1 74 ;?7. 0 0. 0 31. 0 0. 0 0. 012 TL 15. 00 PV 17. ::. Pipe: 86 ?C„ 4 i-Z. '7 PL 19:1 . 00 PF 3 74 27. 0 0I. 0 31. 0 01. 0 2. 9 120 FTG 4E2T PE 0.V" 75 27. 0 0. 0 88. 7 0. 0 0. 010 TL 2.3'.9. 00 PV 0'. 1 Pine: 87 :.35. 4 2. 1 15 PL 3. 00 PF 0. L, 75 27. OF v`. 0 ?8. 7 0. 0 3. 1 c.'.0 F +G T Z'E v7.5 76 25. G v.. 0 29. 1 0. V, 0. 012 TL 15. 00 PV 12'. :F. c1 l oe. P-8 =_66. M 4. 352 :. 10. 00 P*= el. 76 25. E3 Z. 0 r_'9. 1 0.0+ 5. 7 i i?o F TC3 R.E 0. 0' 7;1 25. 8 1. 0 28. 9 0. 0 0. 015 TL 10. 00 OV V). 2 P i oe a 89 600. 5 f>. 357 PL 10. 00 PF O. :_ 77 24. 5 0. 0 32. 4 0. 0 6. 1 120 F" G ---- PE 0. 0 73 24. 5 0. 0 :32. 3 0. 0 0. 011 Tl_ 10. 00 Pv 0. "' SPIRINKI-EA SYSTEM ANALY.S31S Pape 12 Date- 07/07/1994 JOB 1-ITLE: C("jS'--CC) TIGARD (TIRE AREA) PIPE DATA (cont. PIPE TAG F�((:iPM) DIP( . N) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. -IT DISC. ViF- (r:7zS) HW (C) (FT) SUM. NODES 00 ([:Is.! F. I-. ./,=I' (psi ) Pi De: 90 35. 2 2. 15, PL. 3. 00 PP 0.2 77 c.4. rli 0. 0 .32. 4 V. 0 2 120 F-r'G 'i.1 PE --i. 1 78 27. 0 0. 0 31. 1 0. 01 0. 012 TL 15. 00 PV 0. 1 Pi oe: 91 35. 2 2. 227 --1L 193. 00 P P i--'. 3 .78 27. 0 Z. 0 31. 1 0. 0 2. 9 120 FTG 4E2T PE: 0.Vi 79 27. 0 0. 10 28. 9 2.1. 0 0. 009 241. 00 PV V1. i Pipe: 92 35. 2 C'2. i 15 PIL 3. IZ 0 PF= 0.2 79 27. 0 0. 0 L8. 9 0. 0 3. ;R 120 FTG T PE 0. 5 So 25. 8 0. 0 29. 2 0. 0 0,, 012 TL 15. 00 PV 0. 1 IA cli D e. 93 2,3':1,. 4. 35;-::, C L 10. Ov PF 0. 1 80 2 5, [A 0. 0 y. S. 0 120 FTG PF 0.V.1 76 25. 1q 0. V) 0 0. 012 TL 10. 00 CV Picle: 94 635. 6 6. 357 PL i0. 00 PP V1. 1 81 -4. 5 0. 0 32. 5 0. 0 (-... 4 1;--'0 F TG -------- .--'E 0. 0 77 24. 5 0. 0 32. 4 0. 13 0. 012 TL 10. 00 PV 0. 1.", - 15 PL 3. V Ao P i cle 1 95 3-7. 4 7:1 .. 1 .1 PF 0. 2 81 24. 'S 0. 0 32. 5 ill. le, 4 120 F-TC T PE - :[ . I He 27. 0 0. 0 31 . 2 V). 0 0. 014 T L 15- 00 PV V). i Pipe: 96 37. 4 2.. 227 PL 190. 00 PF 2. 3 82 27. 0 0. 0 :7 1,. 2, Vi. 0 :1 1.x.'0 F TG Lp-F PE 0. 0 83 27. 0 0. 0 ?9. 0 0. 0 0. 011 TL 214. 00 F-IV 171. 1 Pi De: 97 77. 4 2. 115 PL 3. 00 PF 0. S-3 27. 13 0. 01 17. 1Z, 3. 4 120 F TG T PE 0. 5 ij z1- 25. (A 0. 0 29. ._. 01 . 0 0. 014 TL. 15. 00 Pv 0. 1 P ipe t 98 196. ( 4. 3 PL 10. 00 PF 0. 1. 134 2 5. 8 V). 0 ;=-,g. 3 0. 0 4. 2 1 =0 I ;:,V*(77 ---- F E 0. 0 13111 25. S 0. 0 a. 2 0. 009 0. 00 C)e: 99 673. 0 6. 357 PL 10. 00 PF 0. 1 65 24. 5 0. 0 32. 7 0. 0 6. 8 i 20 c-TC, PE 0.0 81 4. F) 0. it, 32. 5 0. 0 0. 01.3 'FL 10. 00 Ov 0. 3 Picle: I 00 36. 8 2. 1 1'S PIL 3. 00 PF0, 24. Fj 0. 0. 32. 7 7% 0 5 12 V) G T D F. -.:t. .. 86 27, 0 0. LA 311. 3 01. O. 0. 015 TL i Fj. 00 PV 0. 1 cli 1111.1 3A. 8 ER. 227 :,L.. 174. 00' CIP 2. :31 St 27. V, 0. 0 31. 3 0. C/I 3. 2 120 FTG 3ET PE 0.Q) 9 c ..,v 7 27. 0 0. 0 29.0 01. 0 0. 0 1. t ';'-L- 1:'04. 00 0. 1 loe: 102 38. 8 2. i i 3 P�- 3. 00 F-ry 0.2 87 27. 0 0. V, 29.0 (d. 0 3. 5 120 FTG T PE 0. 5 as 25. S 0. 0 29. 4 0. 0 071. 015 TL 15. 00 PV 0. 1 SORINKLE9 SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS =-arjp- 13, Date: 07/171 ^'34 JOB TITLE: COS, CO ; 1cARD AREA) PIPE DATA PIPE r,A(3 0 (OP-M) D!At 1,N) LENIG7F-4 PR�=ss,. END Ek-EV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL (FE'S) i-:W (C) (',7'T) GUM. NODES (Fr) (K) (PSI ) (c3pm) P. L. /FT (P.I,::-)I ) p j UE 0 1--: 158. 6 4. 352 PL .110. 00 Pp 0. 1 ps 9 0. 11) 12,9 1;2*0 FTG PE 0. 0 84 i. 8 izi. Q) 2913 01, 0 0. 17106 TL 10. 00 PV 0, -L Pioe; 104 711. 8 6. ,--,57 PL 10. 00 OF 0. 1 89 24. 5 0. lb .32. 8 Q71.0 7. 2 -, 20 FTG P CA.0 85+ 24. 5 0. 0 332. 7 171. 01 0, 015 *,- - 10. 00 V 0. 3 ploe: 105 38. 8 2. 11 15 PIL 3. 00 PP, CA P,9 ;2,4. =i 0. 0 32. 8 t/i. tit 3. 1*5 120 FTG T P, -I. I A , 130 2 7. 0 0. 0 :-"1. 5 0. v b. Q A 5 TL- 1 c. 00 PV 0. 1 P i oe. A Ok, 38. 8 = 2c''7 PL 190. 00 DF iR. 4 90 7. 0 0. 0 31. 5 111. 0 3. 2 1.20 FTG 21' PE 0.V., 7. 0 A 1.9 1 0. 0 29. 1 0. v 0. 011 TL. 214. 001 z1V 0. 1 PiPE : 07 36. 8 2. 1 15 PL 3. 00 PF- 0.R, 7 p 9 c'7. 0 171. 0 9. 1. 0. 0 3. 5 120 FTG E 0. F) 1.92 25. 8 0. 0 29. 4 0. 0 0. 21.15 TL , r7-j. 011 pV 0. 1 Pi ue: 108 119. 13 4. 3,52 PL i 0. L7.0 CF 0. 0 92 8 0. 0 2,9. 4 Q .i1. 0 2. Es -20 F T G - PE 0.0 as 25. 8 10. 0 29. 4 0. 0 0. 003 TL 10. 00 1='V 21. 0 Pine: 109 750. 6 6. 357 PL 101. 001 F_IP7 0. 2 . 1b 7. (.-, A;:-�,Q1 FTG ---- 4. 5 0. 0 33� 0 Q'A 0. 0 89 24. 5 010 32. 6 01. 0 121. 2116 TL12). 00 1'V 0. 4 pi oe: 110 39. 9 2. 11.5 PL ._. 00 0. 2 93 24. 5 0. 1b 33. 0 V_1. 01 3. 6 120 F.-T C, T PE 1 94 27. Q) 0. it) 31 . 7 0. 0 0. Ol 5 TI 15. 0101 C,V 01. I P i pe: 111 39. 9 2. 227 PL 190. 00 PF 2.f-:1 94 27. 0 0. 0 51 . 7 it). 10 3. 3 1e'1- FTG 2T PE. 0. 0 9'W, 127. 0 0. 0 213. 1 O. 0. P TL 2'-4. 0141 PV I/ Pine: I1;' .39. 9 2. 115 PL 3.100 C,F, 0. 2 95 27, 0 0. 0 29. 1 0. Q1 3. 6 120 FTG T PE 0.`r 96 2`.i. 8 01. 0 1,29. 4 1p. 0 10. 015 "IF L- Is. 00 Pv 0. 1 Pipe- 13 61. 0 4. 352 PL 10. 00 P;r 0.CA 96 2151113 v1. 0 29. 4 0. v, 1. 7 180 P77'G ---- DE 0. 0 ge 25. 8 01. 0 29. 4 0. 0 0. 002 T1- 10. 001 PV 0.111 a,i oe 14 i`9Z). Fj 6. 357 :11 lj1. LAO' I.T. -TG vt 97 5 0. 0 33. 1 IZ!. 01 8. 1- 20 F ---- P E Ill . 93 24. 5 0. 0 3,3. 0 0. 10 0. 71.8 T L 10. 1711- ?V 0. Pipe: 15 41 . 1 2. 11 5p [:,L- 3. 00 I-'; 171. 97 24. 5 0. 0 33. 1 0. 0 3. 8 120 FTG T PE -1. 98 X7.0 et. 0 31. 8 0. 0 0. 016 TL 15. 00 PV 171. I SPRINKLE:q �')Y;7'--,'Yl HYDRAU-IC PNOLYSIS) Pane 14 Date- 07/071;'394 ,JOB TITLE- MSTCO ."I-3ARD AREA) P-7P,E DA" P (cont. 011)E TA6 G(GPM) DIP( I-\ ) LFMCM- PREqS.. END E-EV. Noz. P,. DISC. VEL (FPS) HW(C) (FT) Sur"). 0 1)F-5 (F,;-) (K) ( .sI ) (GPWI) F. L- /P`T (PPI ) I Pioe: 1 16 4.11 1 2. ::E7 PL 190. 00 PF 2. 7 98 1.7. 0 0. 0 31. 8 0. 0 3. 4 120 FT(3 2 PE: 0. 0 99 27. qj 0. 0 e. 13. 1 0. lb 13 TL 214. 00 PV 0. 1 Pioe: 117 41. 1 2. 115 PL 3. 00 PF 0. i 99 27. V, 17- 0 ;:`9. 1 0. 0 3. 8 120 FTG T PE 0. 100 25. 8 0. 0 9. 4 0. V) 016 TL 15. 00 PV 0. 1 Pioe: 118 41. 1 4. 352 PE_ 10. 00 PF 0.0 100 25. 8 0. 0 29. 4 0. 0 0. 9 1i-'0 FTG ----- PE 0. 0 L ' '10 .�rr A 96 -1. L 0. 0 29. 4 0. 0 0. 000 rL 10. Q PV 0.0 Pioe: I.A -.631. 6 tom. :57 PL 17A. 83 PF 4. 3 97 24. 5 0. 0 33. 1 0. 0 8. 4 120 r-rG 37. '70 PE 0.V, 101 214. 55 0. V) 37. 5 0. 0 0. 0;:'0 TL 216. 53 PV 0. Pioe: 120 -831. 6 B. 249 PL I fl. 67 Piz 0.G 101 24. 5 0. 0 37. 51 0. 0 5j. 0 120 FTG 96. 90 F E 9. 6 102 2. 3 0. 0 47. 7 01. 0 0. 006 TL 115. 57 PV 0.01 PiDe: 121 --A'_.1. 6 A, 24 9 PL 7. 00 PF el. 6li 102 2. 3 0. 0 47. 7 0. 0 5. 0 1 20 F'Tr. 95. 20 PP 0.EN RP 0. 55 H. S. 49. 1. 1.u)0. op 0. 006 TL 10c:. 20 PV 0. 2 Pioe: 122 -931. 6 B. 390 PL 22. 00 PF 0. -1 RB 0. 5 H. S. 100" 0 5. 4 140 FTG 69. 20 0. A 0. 0 H. 9, 49. 7 400. 0 Q). Q0 TL 91. 20 PV 0.2 Pioe: 123 -582. 0 8. 390 PL1352. 00 PF 2. 9 17.1. 0 i . S. 49. 7 00. 0. 3. 4 1,+0 F"TG B7. -90 PE 0.Q) 0. 0 0. tA 52. E'. 0. 0 0. 002 TL1439. 90 PV 0. 1 Pinet 124 749. 7 8. 390 PL 884. 00 PF 2. 9 0. 0 V). 0 S.E. E.- 0. 0 4. 4 11.40 FTG 17. 30 PE 0. 0 0. 0 S. (4-9. 7 400. 0 0. 003 TL 901. 30 PV O. i Pi ow: 125 6 8. 390 PL 368. 00 PF 3. El B Vi. 0 0. 0 c2. 6 0. 7. 7 140 FTG 24. 00 PE 0.V, C 0. el 1/1. 0 5E„ c. v1. 0 0. 009 TL 39c., 00 PV 0. 4 Pioe: IL26 FIXED P,,R S i R E L 0 S(3 D E'v E D 0. 0 0. 0 61 .. 2 0. 0 5. vl r-,-,:i. 1331. t, nom Cl 'z. 0 0. 0 56. 2 0. 0 Pi oem i 1c-,7 -1.331. 8 8. :3'.'30 PL 35. 00 0. 13 D 0. 17� Q1. 0 6-1. 2 0. V, 7. 7 140 PTG 51. 90 P 6 -.3.5 fml q c 8. 0 SRCE 58. 6- A) vj. o0,7, "(L 86. 90 :'V 0. 4 PiDe. 11W'8 8 155. 3 2. 115 n'L 1. 00 PF 21. 110 14. 7 o'. V) 4'. E 0. 0 14. 2 120 F"('0 T PE -1. 2 11 1 l 7'. 5f 0. QA 1 6. 0 0. 190 TL 13. 00 PV 1.4 G0RINK--.r--,R ;yS,rEryf i-YDRAJI-IG ANHLY4nlc;' Pane IS mate: 07/0-//1994 .jOB TIT;-E: T,,GA,--4D (": RE AREr-O is E "`AG O(GPM) DIA(ltv) LENG'H 0 R.:-:'Fs S, END ELEV. N-LIZ. PT DISC. VEL- (FPS) MW (C) (p SOY;. NODES (F- ( ls) (PSI ) (GLIM) F. L. /FT (PS! P i oe- 12-9 155. 3 2. 227 7.,L 32. 00 p p 6.5 11 1 17. ',"-5 0. 0 18.9 0. 0 12'. a 120 F"FG T PE 0. 0 1 12 17. 5 11. 4 1 L�. 4 40. i? 0. 147 TL 4,6. 00 PV 1 . 11. Dl oe: 130 115. 1 2. 227 PL. A. 00 PF, 0. 7 112 !7. 5 11. 4 12:. 4 40. 2 9. 5 120 P T G P E 0.0 .113 17. 5 11. 4 11 . 7 39. 1 0. 065 TL Fs. Oo PV 0. G P i ce-. 1.31 76. 0 2. ::27 Fl,L a. 0V+ 3'F 0. 3 113 17. 5 1 1. 4 11. 7 39. 1 F, 3 1 i�--0 F-rG PE v). LA 114 17. 5 11 . 4 11. 4 38. 5 0. 03`3 Tl- 8. 00 PV 0, .3 A PA op- - 132 37. 5 2. 22 P 7 P L. a. ov Pp' 0. 114 17. Fj I i . 4 1 1. 4 38. S 3. 1 120 r-Tf3 pr 0.0 i IS 17. 5 11. 4 i. 1. 38. 4 0. vl I I TL a. 00 PV 0. 1 P i De: 133 2. 2 2-f FIL 8. 00 PF, N. 0 115 17. 5 11. 4 :11 3, 38. 4 0. :1 12'0 FTG E 0. 0 116 17. 5 11 . 4 11. 3 38. 4 0. 000 TL B. Qio PV 0.1/1 Pi op: 134 -39. 3 2,27 PL F5. 00 (=,F 0. 1 116 17. 1 '-, . 4 11. 3 36. 4 3 120 FTG PE 0.V, 117 17. 5 11. 4 :11. 4 38. F, 0. 012 TL 8. 00 PV 07. i Pine: i 35 -77. 9 2. 2i'--,7 PL 8. 1/10 PF., 0. 3 A 17 17. S 11, 4 1. 1 . 4 3R. f.:, 6. 4 1 0 ;:,,,G -1.--- PE 10. 0 118 17. Ef t 1. 4 11. 8 39. 1 0. 041 T, L 8. lz,o PV 0. 3 Pi oe.- 136 -.117. 0 20,7 PL 00 PF - I 118 17. 5 11 . 4 1 1 . 8 39. 1 9. 6 120 PTG3 T pr`_ 0. 0 119 17. 5 0. 0 13'. 9 0. 0 0. 087 TL ;:-'4. 00 PV 0. 6 Pioei 137 ---117. 0 2. 1 IS PL 1. 00 pr-- 1.5 119 17. 5 0. I/i 13. 9 0. 0 10. 7 120 FTG T n-VT 1. :-? 120 14. 7 0. 0 6 171. V, 0. 112-, TL 13. 00 PV 0. [1 Pi oe: 138 155. 3 3. 352 Pi- 12. 00 PF 0- 2 121 14. 7 Vt. 0 A 0. (A 5. 6 120 FTG PIE 0. 0 .110 14. 7 1,f). 0 22. F, 0. 0 0. 020 TL 12. 00 DV 0. 2 P 1,39 1 S 3 1 15 PL 1. 00 PIZ' 2. .1 A 4. 7 0 2. FS vl. 0 4. 2 1"?vA ;:TG 122- 17, f:-; 0 10 9. v'. V) 0. 190 TL. 13. 00 PV 1. 4 Pi oe 140 155. 5 227 S;:.. OVI r.1 12 2', !7. 5 0. 0 9. :1 0. 0 12r;� F,rr T PS 0. of 1213 17. 5 11. 4 12-1. F-1 40. 5 P L 44. 00 PV 1. 1 PiDe. "'el 1 115. 0 2'27 Pl,- 8. 00 PZ' 0. 7 .123 17. 5 11. 4 12. 6 40. 5 9. 5 120 FTG 0. 0 P4 17. 5 11. 4 12. 0 39. 4 V1. 085 TL 8. 00 Mv 0.F.,-, SYSTP-7t-1 t-YD-Re)ULIC ANALYSIS Pace It:. Date- 07/07/:' 994 J 0 p -Irl .;-I-E 3 U 19 T C 0 TI G AR D ( 71 R S AREA PIPZ. DA'-' A (corft. PIPE "AG O(SPM) DIA( IN) L.ENGTi-' PRFSS. END ELEV. NL)Z. DISC. VE:.- (FPS) HW(C) (PT) skjfy. NODES (.:7,7) (X) F. t- /FT (PSI ) P i n-e 142 '75. 5 2. 227 PL H. 01'f PF 0. 124 17. 5 11. 4 12. 0 39. 4 (1. 2 120 FTG ---- PE 0. 0 12FJ 17. 5 11. 4 1 ,-. 7 38. 13 0. 039 TL B. 00 PV 0. Piop: 143 361 6 2. 227 PI_ 8. 0Q) PF 0. 1 125 17. 35 11. 4 1i. 7 38. "3 3. 0 120 F7L PC 0.0 26 17. .1 1. /4 1 1, C-1 .3a. p V). 010 -F!-. a. 0Q, PV o' i P i oe., 144 -iE:'- 2 2. 227 P!- 8. 00 PF 0.V, 12 F, 17. 5 11. 4 1.11. 61 38. 8 0. ;R 120 FTG PE 0. 0 3.27 17. Fj 1i . 4 6 38. 8 0. 000 TL 6. 00 PV 0.CA Pi oe: 145 2. 2 27 PL 19. 00 PF LA. I 1217 17. 3 ! 1 . 4 11. 6 30. (3 3. 4 120 FTC, PE 0.Vi 17. 5 1 1. 4 11 . 7 0 0. 01 ?, TL. 8. 00 PV 0. 1. i ne: ! 46 ---79. 9 R. 227 PL. 8. 00 PF 0. 1-3 �28 17. 5 11. 4 11. 7 319. 0 el. (,-j 120 F'rB PE 0. 0 I E19 17. 5 11. 4 :L 2. 0 39. 5f 0. 043 TL (3. 1710. PV 0. &.7 PIL P'.1oin: 147 2* 1;:::,. 00 PF 2. 129 17. 3 11. 4 12. 0 39. 5 9. 8 1,20 FTG T PE 0.V1 130 17. 5 0, Q) 14, 2: 0. 0 0. 091 TL 24. 00 PV 0. 7 P i oe?: 148 --, 19. 4 2. 11:3 PL 1. 00 pr 1.11; 130 17. 53 0. 0 14. �R' 0. 0 9). 9 120 FTG T PE i. C*-. 131 14. 7 0. Z) 15. 9 0. lb 0. 117 rL 13. 00 PV 0.ci 1 op: 149 1 .17. 0 2,. 727 PL 1.:-*. 00 PP .1 0. 4 131 14. 7 0. IZ, -6. 9 0. 11 6. 4 120 FTG PE 0.0 120 14. 7 11. 0 ..6. 6 0. 0 0. 033 7L 1.c_'. 00 PV 0. 3 Pioet 150 310. 8 3, 352 PL 12. 00 PF: 0. t:) 132 14. 7 0. 0 x'3. 7 0. 0 1 1. 120 FTG ---- PE 0. 0 121 14. 7 0. lb 2,12. 8 Q71, 0 0. 073 TL 12. 0 0 PV VA.9 a p- 15.1 .1.55,- 115 PL J.. 00 2. 5 14. 7 L 3 0. Qi 3223. 7 0. 0 14. 3 120 FTG T PE -1.2 133 :17. 5 0. Q) 0. 0 0. 0 0. 192 TL 13. 00 PV 1. 4 i oe 152 156. 2 E. 227 PL 32. 00 PP 6.E:. 133 17. 5 0. 0 0 0. 0 9 120 Fr T B T PE V). o 134 17. 5 1 i. 4 13. 4 4 8 Z. 149 TL 44. 00 PV 1. .:. P:i o e "`13 :1, 14. 4 227 Dt- 8. 00, P;:, 0. 7 .134 17. 5 1 1. 4 3 4 41 . 8 9. 4 120 PTO PE 0.0 135 17. 5 11. 4 J. 8 40. 7 0,, 084 TL S. 00 PV 0. 6 e '73. 7 2. 20,7 Pi- B. Q)V)' . 135 17. 5 11. 4 12. 8 40. 7 6. 1 120 FTG ---- f---P- 0. 0 136 17. 5 1i. 4 12. 5 40. 3 0. 037 TL A. lbo PV d.2, w SPIRINKi-ER ';YS'ri:--'i+ HYDRAULIC ANA!..YF. 19 PACIP Date: 07/0711994 JOB '71 TLE: CCIS-TC0 TIGARD ( r.137 ;;REA) piplE DATA (writ:. PR F S.S. PIIZE. TPG DIA(IN) LEN(37H END ELEV. NOZ. p Dl SC. VEL (r--PS,, HW(C) (F-: ) S(Tr. NODE=S (FT) (P S.1 ) (GP'Y0 P. 1- /FT %-,91 ) P, ae: 155 33. 4 2. 227 PL 8. 00 PF 0. 1. 136 17. 5 11. 4 1211 5 40. :3 2. 8 12,0 FTG P E 0. 0 137 17. 5 11. 4 12. 4 40. 1 0. 009 TL 8. 00 PV 0. 1 1 0. 0 I ne- 156 --Fj. 7 2. 2ii.'7 PL A. PIF 137 17. 5 11. 4 12. 4 40. 11 lZi. 6 120 F*T(.'j PE 0.IZ, 1 0. 000 TL 8. 00 PV 0. 0 ..38 -- 11. 4 12'. 4 4 0. 1 Pioe: 137 -46. 9 2. 2.2%,7 P'L a. V-0 pr-:, 0. 1 138 17. 57 11, 4 12. 4 40. 1 3. 9 120 F'r G PF 0. 0 139 17.5 11. 4 12. 51 40. 4 0. 016 TL a. OQ; PIV 16. 1 Pi De. 158 -87. 2 2. 227 PL a. To C:,-- 0. 4 139 1'1, 5 11 . 4 1 E. 5 40. 4 7. 2 120 +=•TG ------- PE 0.0 140 17. S 1 1. 4 1.2. 9 41 . 0 0. 051 7L. 3. 00 PV 0. 3 P 4 oe: 15 9 - I J`8. 2 2. 22.7 P L 12. Okl PF ;:-:!.E; 14L) 17. 5 ll. 4 12. 9 4.1. 0 10. 6 120 F'TG T PE 0. 0 141 1.7.S Q). 1z, 15. 4 0. (A 0. 1403 7L 24. 00 PV 0. B PJ ae: 160 -.1.='A. 2 2. 115 PL 1. 00 )*-IF t. 7 141 17. FJ 0. 0 15. 4 ill, 0 Il . 7 120 FTG T I-"E- I.2, 142 14. 7 0. 0 IB. 4 0. 0 kA. 133 YL. 13. 00 PV 0. 9 Pi re: I 60A c-'I"36. 4 2. 727 PL. 12. LAO PP 14. 7 11). QD 18. 4 0, 0t 0 12'0 L71 PTG E 0. 0 131 14. 0. 0 16. 9 0. 0 0. 120 TL 12. 00 PV 1. 1. P j De.. :61 -364. F, 727 ='L 33. OR PF:, 132. 2 142 14. 7 0. it) 18. 4 0. 11 (.1 .20. Z) 1.20 F7'TG 16. 150 PE --2.9 10 21 . 2 0. V) 28. 8 0. 0 1/1. 267 7L. 49. 58 PV 2. 7 piop- : 162 4F 7. 0 3. 352 PL 4. 50 PF 4. -.*'.' 13L 14. 7 0. 0 23. 7 0. 0 1*7. 0 120 FTG 23. 30 PE 0. 0 233 14. Z!. 0 178. 0 0. 0 0. 154 TL 27. 80 PV .; . 9 163 --467. v) 4. 352 PL 11 . 50 PF 0. 9 233 14. 7 0. 0 28. 0 0. 0 1 Q1. 1 120 FTG 9. 00 PE 0.Q) .71 234 14. 7 0. 0 28.9 0. 0 0. CA43 TL 20. 50 PV 0. 7 PiDe: !E4 --467. Q) 4, 352 fZ'L 19. El 5 PIP 3. 13 234 .4. 7 o" 1? 28. 9 Q. 0 0. 1 1 G S-7. 80 PF -4. 8 52A 2 51. S 0. 0 7. 4 LA. lZ 0. 04131 7"L. 77. 05 PV 0. 7 NOTES: (1 ) cSilculations, wp-r(z? oF-,-fr,r-pd by tne ;-!ASS 5. 8. 0 ronlouter or ourAro ul-lber licerf--e nc" 0iP815132- crAritesd by ;2' 93 Rancnwcocid Dr. . N. E. At :iant A, Gn ,3;034`J lGc:,R'T.*Nv,l_t—_R sys'rEte' HYDRAULIC ANAI..YSIS JOq T1(31ARD ('_TRE AREA) (2) the sys-Lein hiR- oeei-, -)a.Rriced 'tc, w-r-,vicie At-, avet-,.Ace irot)alarice_ at each rfodr. of 0. 00'S morn Land. a rail x.i rourfl irsibalaroc,e at ariv ricide of 0. 706 (3) vplcic,-Ltv m-psSuy-es oy-iroted foo- informatioro ciril,,.,, arj(j iy-(= not utsec, ir, nAlancirto the system. Maximum. water- velocity Is 20. 0. ft/sec at cji .,)e 161. (4) PIPE PITTINGS TABLE Pi o e "fable N-A rn e, STANDARD. PIP PAGE: 9 MATERIAL: 1'14NWL HWC: 120 D i Aroet er-, Enuivalent FittirooLengthis in Feet in) T L C G A D f2e LrocEll f.hkVIv F.(fvVlv BAtV!,v AlrnChk DPV I v 6. .3 57 18. 00 38. 100 . 1 . 00 40. 00 13. 00 4. 00 F5. 00 24. @Vj S. 2"4 9 00 39. 00 15. 00 50. 00 13. 00 4. 00 39. 00 .30. 00 SPRINKLER SYSTEhtI` YDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 19 Date: 07/07/,.994 - .JOB TITLE: CDSTC0 TIOPRD (,"ll.R AREA) WATER SUPPLY CURVi" i I 110+ I �t 100+\ I \ I \ 90+ \ I \ i \ I \ P so-f. \ R � E I \ s I \ S 70•+• \ IJ I \ R I \ E I \ 60+ \ c I x \ p I \ C I \ 1 3-LA+ \ ) I \ I \ 40+ \ I \ I \ \ -0+ LE faF.•.I\ID \ * (--16- 0 0<_i @ 461,,8 nom" X = Reaulred Water Suonly F.laW 'r f=- Pco.1r,t" 58. 56 nsi id 133-. . s oom L7, = Avai .l,a!nie Water Suanly " 95. 1 71 . H arira „ s., 2a:i l? .��.. I it Q1+-h-•+---.....+--...._t-------+------t-.-----_.-+-----'----•h-._------- 6OO2400 3200 4000 4800 5600 6400 7200 601PQ'f LCIJ (GPM) Construction Inspection tip Related'Ies g Carlson Testing, inC• Geotechnical Consnitin P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)6843460 FAX 0 684-0954 July 11, 1994 94-1566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: July 8, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: N.P. Murphy 07-08-94: CTI representative verified size and placement cof rebar for masonry - 8" CMU. All appears to be per plans and specifications . CTI representative obtained sample of grout and cast one set of (3) 1/2 block prisms and one set of (3) 4x8 grout test specimens. Limits of placement. were foundation wall at rear of building. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TFSTIN C. Douglas W. Leach President HPM/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of. Tigard Robinson Construction Co. C; onstruction Inspection& Related Tests a�rlson Testing, Inc.Inc• Geotecluiical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Phone 1503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 July 11, 1994 94-L566 Permit No. BUP 94-0001 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: July 11, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 07-11-94: CTI representative verified size and pl4cement of reloar for today's concrete pour. All appears to be per plans and specifications. Limits of placement: Finish .floor slab on grade, Grids E to D, C to B, H to J and F to G, from 1 to 3 - approximately 360 yards . Obtained samples and took slumps every 25+ yards and cast one set of (3) 6x12 test cylinders for every 100 yards of concrete. Slumps were from 4 1/2" to 5" at point of discharge at pump. Concrete delivered at 3" slump without additives . According to Superintendent (Mark) with General Contractor, Randy White with Costco will allow a 5" slump even though specifications state 411 . Quality control with Lonestar on site during pour and added water accordingly to make 5" slump. Mason requested to hi-Lift grout CMU from 4 ' as specified to 8 ' on Grid Line 1, from C+11 to G. Called Structural Engineer Phillip Vary Heyninger of Engineers Northwest and discussed same. Mason will. be al.low7�d to hi-lift (81 ) grout if cells are kept clean by CTI visual inspect-.;on, rebar positioners are used on verticals, clean outs provided at botto;n of lift and vibrate as per code, which is normal. Yason agreed to above conditions . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without: prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectful] submitted, C EST , INC. I '1 DT las W. Leach sident HPM/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partners: ip City of Tigard Robinson Construction Co. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.0, Box 23814 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: _ _ .___ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX N 684-0954 07/11 94 94-1566- Date Molded: --- , 19- Job No. —— Permit No: -------- - ----- -- - PRICE COSTCO C/O MUL.VANNY PARTNERSHIP COSTCO TIGARD STORE Project. —--------- -- --- TIGARD OR Address: ---- ""--"— — --- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: - ---Sub Contractor: - - -- LONE STAR NORTHWEST _ Truck No. — 58/1'23 Ticket No. 210202-Ill Concrete Supplier: — — H .P . MURPHY 220/350 22/34 Gast By: _,__ Cu.Yds. Load No. SUNNY 90 Weather: Temp.High: Temp.Low: FLOOR SLAB ON GRADC , IST {-SOUR , GRID L lklf- L_ TO D FROM 1 TO :3 & Location of Placement: C TO B FROM I TO 3 . 8: 40/1.0/20 Test Time: — Concrete Temp: 1000 4 112 Strength Requirement: PSI • —days Slump 4.--3-/4"—Cement Type - -27 3/4 Mix No./No.Sacks -----.—Air Content - Max.Aggregate —- Admix.Amount: Brand- Admix.Amount: — -Brand: Set Test® Register Date Date Total --Brand: Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Rec'd -Test Load PSI No. By II.T 7 5953 07/1.2 07/1} 95,966 28 .41 3380 10 JB 28 5953 07/12 08/0 129,130 28.37 4550 35 JH 28 5953 07/12 08/0 127,780 28.37 4500 35 11173 TV 7 5954 07/12 07/1 83 , 155 28.41 2930 10 JB .2 5954 07112 08/0 124,120 28.37 4380 35 JB 28t 5954 07/12 08/0 126,990 28.37 4480 35 JB cc :CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: _ POSTN, =-1`1 T-, SLUMP TESTS- 5" 4 l /2" , 5" Information corMaMed herein la not to be reproduced,excspt In full,without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting 6 X 12 CONCRETE DEPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C1.72/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: __a ____ ___—___ —_. —----- Phone(5V)684-3460 FAX M 684-0954 07/11 94 94-1566 Date Molded: 19— Job No. Permit No: -- -- -- --- - PRICE COSTCO C/O MUI_VANNY PARTNERSHIP Client: _- - -------- — — ------ - ---- — COSTCO TIGARD STORE Project -- - - -- -------------- - _�.� -_ ----- -- T I GARD OR Ad,'ress: -- -- -- -- --- - -----ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor- --_-- -- - Sub Contractor: -------- - LONE STAR NORTHWEST 123/108 210173 Concrete Supplier: - -_Truck No. --_-----Ticket No. N .P . MURPHY 20/110 2/11 cast By: .__---__- -- —Cu.Yds. _,Load No. SUNNY 90 59 Weather. -- -- ---- _— - Temp.High: --. Temp.Low: _----_--- FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , 1ST POUR , GRID LINES H TO J FROM 1 TO 3 1 ocation of Placement: -- - ---- & F TO G FROM 1 TO 3 -----�---� _ 5:30/6=35 74 75 Test Time: —_Core:rete Temp: - 1000 28 5" 1 Stiength Requirement: - - ------------ `PSI as days Slump 5"-_- —Cement Type -- 227 3/4" Mix No./No.Sacks -------- -Air Content -- ---- Max.Aggregate -- - .Admix.Amount __ _—Brand: Admix.Amount: - __- Brand: _-_--- — Set TestO Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Rec'd Test Load _ PSI No. - By I 7 5951 07/12 07/1 91 , 065 28 .41 310 9 JB 28 5951 07/12 08/0 134,760 28.37 4750 34 JB 28 5951 07/12 O8/0E 133,140 28.37 4690 34 JB II 7 5952 07/12 0711E 92, 548 28.41 3260 9 JB 28 5952 07/12 08/OE 129,920 28.37 4580 34 JB _F 28 5952 07112 08/0 131,650 28.37 4640 34 JB cc=CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: -- t2E}BtdSfiM-�@}d'�TRdE'T�6td-�'Q--- SLUMP TESTS= 4 1/2" , 5" .wv#nkw r/hsra{n k nnr+n ha rnnrndrtrwrf.excnnt In full.without n0or authorization from this office. Construction Inspection & Reluted Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting TEST SPECIMENS REPORT OF 6 X 12 CONCRETE P.O. Box 23814 11 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 hone,O3)684.34regon 6 Test Methods: — _ Phone('iX#684.3450 FAX#684-0954 07/11 94 94-1566 Permit No: _ -- --- --- Date Molded: - ------ . 19—-- Job No. - ---- PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP ---_- -- 4 Client: _ ----- ---- ---- --_-- COSTCO TIGARD STORE TIGARD OR Address: ---- ----- -- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor — -- ---------------Sub Contractor. ---.-- ----- ---- --- -- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 123/108 210173 Concrete Supplier: -------------..Truck No. — —Ticket No. _ ----2Y0282-- `-- IJ .P . MURPHY Cu.Yds. 20/110 2/11 --- Cast By: -- -- --- ---_ _ _ .--_ SUNNY 90 59 Weather: ------_--- -------- - - - -Temp.High. - --...--Temp.Low: --- FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , 1ST POUR , GRID LINES H TO J FROM 1 TO 3 Location of Placement: - -- - ---- -- — !3 F TO G FROM 1 TO 3 ---------- -------- -- --- 5:30/6:35 74 75 Test Time: ----- Concrete Temp: -- -- Strength Requirement: `_ - -------PSI a - ----days Siump 5"------Cement Type 227 - - - 3/4 Mix No./No.Sa^k -------------- Air Content __------------ Max.Aggregate - — Admix.Amount: _--_ --_Brand: _ _-------Admix.Amount: _. _---Brand: Set Test Register Date I Date Total Area Unit Repport Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load --__ - PSI No. -.-By — 1 7 5951 07/12 07/1 91 , 065 28.41 3210 9 JB 28 5951 07/12 08/0 28 5951 07/12 08/0 II 5952 07/12 0711E 92, 548 28.41 3260 9 JB 28 5952 07/12 OB/Of 2.8 5952 07/12 08/0 cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: ----- SLUMP TESTS: 4 1/2" , 5" lnfomnation eoMeUed herein Is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. Carlson Testing, Inc. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.U. Box 23814 ASTM C172i C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: Phone(503)884-3460 FAX f+684-0954 Date Molded: 07111 ,19 94 Job No. 94-1566 _ P®tmlt No: ___. PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client: — - -- -- - Protect: _ COSTCO TIGARD STORE ^ TIGARD OR Address: -- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: —_ r Sub Contractor: - -- --- LONE STAR NORTHWEST Truck No, 58/123 —Ticket No. 210202•-I11 Concrete Supplier: ---Z207772--TV-- H.P . MURPHY Cu.Yds. '-20/350 Load No. 22134 Cast By: SUNNY 90 59 Weather: _— Temp.High: Temp.Low: — FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE , IST POUR , GRID LINI F TO D FROM 1 TO 3 & Location of Placement: C TO B FROM 1 TO 3 . 8:40/10/20 76 78 Test Time: Concrete Temp: 4 1/�" Strength Ftequirement: -- — PSI A ------ days Slump 4_me4Cement Type ------ 27 3/4 " Mix NOW Sacks ---- _ Air Content Max.Aggregate - A,imix.Amount: -_-_ .--Brand: _ Admix.Amount: ----- Brand: Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit I Re rt Tested No. Days Number Rec'd Test Load PSI I No. By Ili 7 5553 07/12 07/1 95,966 28 .41 3380 10 JB — 28 5953 07/12 08/0 28 5953 07/12 08/0 IV 7 5954 07/12 07/1 83 , 155 28.41 2930 10 JH - 'H 5954 07/12 08/0 13 , 954 07/12 08/0 cc:CITY OF TIGARD Hemarldr SLUMP 1 I • TS- 5" , 4 112" , 5 Information carttdned herein Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. NOTICF, &6L, City of Tigard Building Impartment13125 OW Ball Blvd, Tigard, Oregon 9'7223 Inapect:ion Line (Rec-O-Phone)= 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4/17?. Inspection.__.^.- -__Sc� l''1�C/ 2o i f Footing Plbg. Underalab Meeh. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out rias Lane FINAL= Post/Beam Strutt. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Pont/Beam Mech.. Ruin Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbq. Underfloor Nater Line Gyp. Ed. -Mecham Date Requested:_____J_-F-_�L Timet AM __ ,PM Address:_ I�S��_J_ .LJc:t- t r��v�� h Pekkff � �y- �' 0/ BuilAers .) kz c kL ] (m TRE POLL40WING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED- Inspectors_ r Inspector:- - -- Data:_ / APPROVED _ _ DISAPPROVED APPROVED 511- TO ABOVE Cal For Reinap. Construction Inmectiun & Related Test Carlson Testing, Inc. Geoterhni.wl Consulting REPORTOF 4X4X8 GROUT TEST SPECIMENS I ------ F.O. Box 14 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: UBC 244-28 __ __ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX q 684-0954 Date Molded: _ 07/08 , 19 94 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: ------- Client: PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP' _ --_ ---- Project: COSTCO TIGARD STOP<L Address: TIGARD OR Contractor R081NSON CONSTRUCTION -Sub Contractor --- --- -- Concrete Supplier: LONE STAR NORTHWEST Tuck No. `'''_ - Tlcket No. 206566 Cast By: ___— H .P . MURPHY Cu.Yds. - =4- -----_-_-._ Load No. I---- SUNNY 59 Woather: —_ Temp.High: -- - ---—Temp.Low: - I.ocationofPlacement: IST LIFT REAR WALL_ - FOUNDATION Test Time: 2 '30 Concrete Temp: �fi 2000 28 l=I-OWARL-1 T Strength Requirement: -- --- ------- - --SSI d days Slump -- - Cement Type --- -- - C)8Et4 3/8 Mix NoJNo.Sacks -- — - Air Content -- ------- - Max.Aggregate - Admix.Amount: _______Brand: ----Admix.Amount: Brand: - Set TWO Register Date Date Total Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Rec'd Test Load Area PSI No. By 11 5933 07/1.1 07/1- 2854 . 1 16 1780 8 JB 28 593 07/11 08/0. 57,037 16 3570 32 JB 28 5933 07/11 08/0 55,941 16 3500 32 JB Remarks: cc :CITY OF TIGARD ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION CO SPECIMANS MOVED SATURDAY P .M . I InformnMon caftkW herein Is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. Construction In &Related Test; Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPO_BT OF 8X8X 16 PR I SMS TEST SPECIME 1$ _— — P.O. box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: 11BC 24-26 _ __._—__�_,-_ _ Phone(503)684-3460 i� FAX 8 684-0954 Date Molded: 07/08 , 19—24 Job No. _94-1566_ Permit No: - client: PRICE CGSTCO C/O .4Ul._VANNY `)ARTNERSHIP Project: CC)z2T Q T IG RD STORE Address: T I GARD OR Contractor. ROBINSON CONSTPUCIION cuoContractor. concrete Supplier: LONE STAR NORTHWEST _-__Truck No. ___- r'-i_ —__.___ Ticket No. 2106566 r,;,',i t+y: H .P . MURPHY _ _-Cu.Yds. -Load No. i __---_. SUNNY59 Weather. — _ _ _ --Temp High: --...___—-_—Temp.Low: IST LIFT REAR WALL - FOUNDATION i_ocation of Placement: --- - --- - Test Time: 2-30 - --Concrete Temp: 78 1500 FLOWARLE Strength Requirement: _ - PSI days Slump Cement Typo I 3/8" Mix No./No.Sacks -- 0884 ------Air Content -- ---- -- Max.Aggregate — Admix.Amount: --Brand: _ _— __Admix.Amount: — _Brand: Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit Repport 1 ested No. Deys Number Recd Test Load _ PSI No. By 7 5932 07/11 07/1 72,849 53. 39 1370 7 JH 2.8 5932 07/11 08/0 98,943 53.39 1850 31 JB 28 5932 07/1.1 08/0 100,430 53.39 1880 31 JB Remarks: cc:CITY OF TIGARD'ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION CO SPECTMANS MOVED SATURDAY P .M . InfnrmMlen corftkwd herein Is not to he reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this officd. Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechni^nl Consulting REPORTOF 8X8X16 PRISMS TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 2.3814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Te,.,Methods: t QC 24-26 _ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: 07/08 - _, 19 94— Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: Client: PRICE C01,-TC0 C/Q MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: COSTCO T,IGARD STORE _-- Address: T I GARD OR -- _ _--- ---_-.-- Contractor: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION .--------Sub Contractor: — Concrete Supplier. LONE STAR NORTHWEST _—Truck No. —_353_. - _—Ticket No. 206566 castey: —_..____�_I�. P • MURPHY _ _ Cu.oris. __.4 —.Load No. 1 SUNNY ` ' Weather: _.__-.-- �._-_Temp.High: __ Temp.Low: 9 toration ofPlacement: 15T LIFT REAR WALL - FOUNDATION >� _ Test Time: 230_—�-__----Ccncrete Temp: Strength Requirement: —_ 1.500 —PSI 0 _ 28 days Slump I I UWABL I Cement Type I r Mix NoJNo.Sacks ___ 0984Air Contsnt - Max.Agpragate 3/8_ ,----- Admix.Amount: ----Brand: -Admix.Amount: Brand: -- Set Test* Register I Date Date Total Unit Report Tested No. Days Number RecdArea Test Load PSI No. _ By _ I 7 5932 07/11 07/1 72 , 849 53. 39 1370 7 JB 28 5932 07/11 08/0 28 5932 07/11 08/0 I, r„rtrks CITY OF TIGARD* _ ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION CO SPEC I.MAI'S MOVED SATURDAY P .M . Information contained herein is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. Carlson Te- sting, Inc. Construction Inspection & Refuted Test; Geotechnical Consulting REPORTOF 4X4X8 GROUT TEST SPECIMENS .O. Box 23914 "Tigard, Oregon 9728 Test Methods: UBC 24-28 ____— Phone(.503)684-3460 FAX N 684-0954 Date Molded: 07108 -, 19-94— Job No. 94--1566 Permit No: Client: 1>(.:1:;E. COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project: COSTC O TIGARD STORE Address: __ TIGARD OR Contractor: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Sub Contractor. ---- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 3r>"; 206566 Concrete Supplier. _ _—Truck No. _____ Ticket No. — Cast By: __ H .P . MURPHY —Cu.Yds. 4 —_-_.._Load No. 1— SUNNY 14(� 59 Weather: --__— -- -Temp.High: ._____—T Temp.Low: - 1ST LIFT REAR WALL_ -- FOUNDATION Location of Placement: — - ------- - ________ —_ Test Time: 0__�_.___. Concrete Temp: 2000 26 H OW6PH_ I Strength Requirement: —_ PSI ® days Slump ------Cement Type — -- Mix NO./No.Sacks 0884 Air Content Max.Aggregate 3/81, — — Admix.Amount: —Brand: _, _._Admix.Amount: ------Brand: set Test*Test® Register Date Date Total Area Onit Report Tested 140. Days Number Recd Test Lead PSI No. By TT 7 5933 07/11 07/1. 2854 . 1 16 1780 8 JB 28 5933 07/11108/0. 28 5933 07/11 013/0 R7merks: c c :CITY OF TIGARD ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION CO SPECTMANS MOVEr) SATURDAY P .M . InformeWn cnrftkwd herein Is not to be reprodo!ced,excep'in full,without prior authorization from this office. , Construction Inspection& Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc• Geotechnicalconettltin P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 July 6 , 1994 94-1566 Permit No BUY 94-0001 FIELD 1NSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: July 5, 1994 PROJECT: Costco Tigard Store ADDRESS: Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: M. Larson #625 07-05-•94 : CTI representative checked rebar in pad footings on 2 Line, B to H; 3 Line, C to H and continuous footings A Line, 1 to 2; 1 to 1 . 5, A to J; and J Line, 1 to 3 . All rebar appeared to be to plans and specifications . CTI representative observed placement of 130 yards Lonestar 3000 PSI .nix #022.5 . Cast two sets of cylinders for this pour. Also checked rebar for footings around tire store. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information container' herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are a•ty further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully Csu mittedP , N TESTIN INC. W11-1 o glas W. .Leach esident ML/ecp cc: Price Costco c/o Mulvanny Partnership City of Ticaid Robinson Ccnstruction Co. IHSM$971ION NOTICE City of Tigard BiuildiM Department 11125 t3. Nall, 81�d. Tiq� 97223 inepectio: I,ae R -O-Phon 639- v �► Business Phono: 639al Inspection:—_ -- ���� ��/(� Rooting Plbg. Underslab _in Appr/Sdwlk Pound.. P1b0Topi-- __ OEs Lane RIVAL: Poet/Beam Stru-1 San. Sever —_ framing -Bldg. Hoch. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb, Plbg. Underfloor Water Line Gyp. Bd. -Hoch. Data Raquastedt� - Z=j CJ L TLS: PH { Address: ` li " �` �Yl��1AYA.1 Permit -el Oct L Bualderr�Q-=La.:6.� - C�/..�•h.�(f�'"� THS POLIA Ml..G OORRECTzows ARE REQUIRED: fTr� no , - _�Q l/i!?.�/ •QOM' Inspector: —__11 Dote: RoVBD DISAPPROVED .----_.. APPROVED SURJP.CI' 7'O T_BOVE Call For Reinsp. a Construction Inspection & Related Tests CarlaCn Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 Test Methods: ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Phone Tigard,(503Ore>on97281 664-3460 FAX#684-0954 07/05 94 94-1566 Date Molded: , 19 Job No. Permit No: -- ------------- -- - PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY P"RTNERSHIP hent• -- - _ ---_ Project: COSTCO TIGARD STORE - - ---- -- TIGARD OR Addr 9ee: --ROBINSON CONSTRUC I T ON - _Sub Contractor. Contractor. -- Concrete Supplier: _ L 0 N E STAR NORTHWEST706 Truck.No. - i _Ticket No. __,2097b,' ' St By: _ M . CARSON _ Cu.Yds. 0 ------.Load No. -� -_ 4 OVERCAST Temp.High: 0 - Tem Low: 50 12 PAD FOOTINGS , 3 LINE r TO H , 2 LINE B TO H . CONTINUOUS Location of Placement: - FOOT"NGS A LINE 1 TO 2 , 1 TO 1 .5 A TO J , J LINE 1 TO - ---- � - --- —Teel Time: 1 :'31 5 --. Concrete Temp: _ 7 3 ^-- 3000 L8 2 C -/2" —Strpngth Requirement: days Slump Cement Type 1 - -.-- Mix No./No.Sacks 0225 ---Air Content --- Max.Aggregate 3/4 — Admix.Amount: Brand: -----------Admix.Amount: _ Brand: _ Set Tome Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load _ PSI No. By I 7 5872 07/0(, 07/1 79 , 297 28 .42 2790 5 JB 26 5872 07/06 08/0< 122,110 28.31 4310 28 JB 28 5872 07/06 08/0. 125,6: 0 28.31 4440 28 JB HOLL 28 5872 07.,o6 08/02 124,730 28.31 4410 28 JB I Remarks: CC=CITY OF TIGARD _ ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION CO i,--ln ie"tn ho ronrrwtrrrwd axrpnt in full.without nrlor aulhorizallon from this oft]ce. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE J TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 lest Methods: ASTM C 172/C 14 3;C 1064/C 1231/C31/C39 _ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX it 684-0954 Date Molded: 07/05 Job No. 94-1566 Permit No: - Client: PRICE COSTCO C/0 MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP - Project: GOSTCU TIGARD STORE - Address: TIGARD OR --__. - -- - - r_:.mtractor: .— ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION _SubContractor. -- -- - -- - (;oncreteSupplier: LONE STAR NORTHWEST li ick No. —. Ticket No. 1-� Cast By: M . LNRSON 1 O —Load No.Cu. Yds. _ - __—_-.. ------ cJVLI�I i i'. I ------ Temp.High: 70 Temp.Low: 50 Weathar: --- 12 PAD FOOTINGS , 3 LINE C TO H , 2 LINE B TO H . CONTINUOUS Location of Placement: — — FOOTINGS A LINE 1 V-) :? , I TO 1 .5 A TO .1 , J LINE 1 TO 3 . __- Test Time: ------- _- Concrete Temp: ---- ] Strength Requirement - 3000 —PSI O 28 --days Slump -------- ..—Cement Type Aggregate 3/4 9 ------ 0226 Max.A re — Mix No./No.Sacks -- Air Content --- Admix.Amount: Brand: —_.Admix.Amount: Brand: _ --- Set TestO Regist;r Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test _Load — PSI No. _ By t ] 7 5871 07/06 07/1 95 , 575 28.42 3360 6 JB 26 5871 07/06 OB/0; 143,170 28.31 5060 29 JB 28 5871 138,250 28.31 4880 29 JB - R-marks: —(- C :.CITY OF TIGARD — ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION CC) ,.ro"IneA heroin 14 nM M he rawrol,orad Rxr ant in hull withrxut prior authorization from this office. Constric t iorr hispection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPO13TOF 6X12 CONCRETE TESTSPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1.231/C31/C39 hone,O3)684-3460 regon 97281 tett Methods: Phone(503)684-3460 FAX q 684-0954 Onfe Molded: 07/05 , 19 94 Job No. '14-1566 Permh No: - -------------- __._- -- Jiient: __ PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Project; C_OSTCO TIG�-RD STORE _ Address. _T I GARD OR contractor: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION —_�—�SubContractor. Concrete Supplier: LONE STAR NORTHWEST __Truck No. _—_—.__TlrketNo. "es+.By. M . LARSON cu.Yds10 ___ Load No. 12 Weather: OVLRCAST ----- ___--Temp.Higr 1. 70 —Temp.Low: 50 I ocatlon of Placement: 12 PAD FOOTINGS , 3 LINE C TO H , 2 L I14E B TO H . CONTINUOUS — - fOOTINGS ALINE 1 TO 2 , 1 TO 1. .5 A TO J , J LINE 1 TO 3 . —_-__ — Test Time: —_ --- -Concrete Temp: - -- Strength Requirement: 3000 _PSI O - -`-�i ---days Slump ____ __ rement Type i - Mix No./No.Sacks 0226 Air Content -------- Max.Aggregate 3/4 - Admix.Amor Brand: -----------Admix.Amount __— Brand: Set Test 0 Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Rec'd Test. _ Load PSI No. By 11 7 5871 07/06 07/1 95, 575 28.42 3360 6 1 JB 23 5871 07/06 08/0: 28 5871 07/06 08,'0.' Remarks: cc :CITY OF TIGARD PORTNc,ON CONSTRUCTION CO Inf.mmmirm r ilmllo d heroin Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Ceotechtical Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CO'gCRETE TE8TSPECIMENS F, , .O. Box 23A 4 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods:_ -- Phone(E03)6843460 FAX is 684-0954 07/05 94 94-• 1566 Date Molded: , 19Job No. Permit No: -- _--- --- - PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client: _ -- — ------ ----- COSTCO TIGARD STORE Project: - — — TIGARD OR Address: — -- — — kOBTNSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: __._ ----Sub Contractor: _ CcncreteSuppGer: LUNE STAR NORTHWEST ___Truck No. — 7063 Ticket No. -- Cast B�: M . LARr ON1�� Load No.2 Cu.Yds. ----....._----- — —_ OVEkCAST 70 50 Weather. —__--.Temp.High: Temp.Low: Location of Placement: - 12 PAD FOOTINGS , 3 LINE C TO H , 2 LINO B TO H . CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS A LINE 1 TO 2 , 1 TO 1 .5 A TO J , J LINE 1 TO 3. Test Time: 135 Concrete Temp: . 73-- 3000 3-3000 28 2 1/- ' I Strength Requirement: __. — _PSI o days Slump —_----Coment Type --. r ? / ' Mix rvo./No.Sacks -- 022 J — Air Content —Max.Aggregate / t ------— Admiy.Amount: _-_ —. Grand: _ Admix.Amount: Brand; — Set I Test® Registo)r Date Date Total Unit Report Tested No. I Days _ 'cumber Recd Test —,Load Area PSI-1 No. By� I 7 58,''2 07/0r, 0711 79, 297 28.42 2790 5 JB 28 5872 07/06 08/0. ?rt 5872 07/06 09/0 HOLC 587; 07/06 Remarks: c c:CITY OF TIGARD RORINSOM CONSTRUCTION GO Information eanEeMod herein Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. PLMBING IT CI1Y OF TIGARD PERMITLI##. . . . . . . : PLM94 --0068 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D6FEWMENT DATE ISSUED: 06/28/94 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Ore2on 97223*8199 (503)639-4171 PARCEL.. 13-136CD 02 ::00 SITE ADDRESS. . . : 07855 SW DAR fMOUTH ST SUBDIVISION. . . . : PALMER ACRES ZONING: C-G PL's 3LOCK. . . . . . . . . . . LOT. . . . ., . . . „ . . . . . 1 CLASS OF WORK. . s NEW GARBAGE DISPOSALS. . : MOB I L_E HOME SPACES. : TYPE OF USE. . . . KCOM WASHING MACH. . . . . . . : BACKFLOW PREVNTRS. . :5 OCCUPANCY GRP. . :B2 FLOOR DRAINS. . . . . . . :62 TRAPS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . : STORIES. . . . . . . . : 1 WATER HEATERS. . . . . . :5 17PTCH BASINS—, . . . . s FIXTURES _•.--------- --- LAUNDRY TRAYS. . . . . . : SF RAIN DRAINS. . . . . s SINKS. . . . . . . . . . : 15 URINALS. . . . . . . . . . . . :3 C^EASE TRAPS. . . . . . . ll LAVATORIES. . . . . : 11 OTHER FIXTURES. . � . . :41 TUR/SHOWERS. . . . : SEDER LINE (ft , . . . . : 100 WATER CL_OSFTS. . : 13 WnTFR LINE (ft ) . . . . : .100 DISHWASHERS. . . . : RAIN DRAIN (ft ) . . . . : Remarks : Costco Store- new retail bl.li ]ding TOTAL TIF: $153, 774. 00, Mass Trans : I L 1, 506. 00, Industrial TIF: $.i42, 268. 00, t1wrier: --._._____....__. ._.__._.__._____.______._____.____._---___._.__._._._._.___ FEES MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP type alaount by date recpt 12200 NORTHRUP WAY PRMT E !R12. 50 JO 06/28/94 PL.CK $ 303. 13 JG 06/28/94 - BELI_EVUE WA 9E1005 5PCT t 60. 63 JG 06/28/94 - Phone #: c:01 -•881--76091 Contractor: ---------______.____.-_--•_-___-___ WESTERN PLUMBING, INC. 9460 SW TIGARD ST T i rARI) OR 97223 Pl-ic .- #: 639--5296 t 1576. 26 TOTAL Rey V. . : 02439 -------- REQUIRED INSPECTIONS ------ This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the RoLlgh-- in Insp Tigard Municipal Code, State of Gre. Specialty Codes and all other Top-out Insp applicable laws. All work will be done in accordance with Rain Drain Insp approved plans. This permit will expire if work is not started Drinl(ing Fot_tntai Within 199 days of issuance, or if work is suspendfd for more RFS/Packflow Prev than 189 days. Final Inspection _ Permittee Signat+ares'•' - i• — �~'i �� T s s 1-I e d B y 1,111) J:. . Call for inspz_tion - 639-4175 City of Tigard PLUMBING PERMIT Planck/Rec. #_ 13125 sw Hall Blvd. APPLICATION Permit # 6$ Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4111 —1- — 1`Tfesrnpuon OHS 814-21-610 :PRICC A—MT� Job7, — FIXTURES Address - ,n -- - -- — - --- _LZ -7 W Tui cx'-1"ub7S5owe" r Comb.-__._ Owner lr� C1 /10 j4Gr C 02't wasSier'- — Ga yo 7.50 k1 r�L as in-MacTine — M W»aFloor rain r ?33 Water HeaterOccupant y - --- dint ry FToaTy - T� Other Fixtures 'Spee -- 706 1jo �'� 1750 - - • ,�-•� -- CII- =3Sa, znkz.2 MISCELLANF"OUS Sower ist .. o rawer ea. IDC Water Service I st 100 20.00 -11±re by accnina a have re is ap K:a-lwiat the -- Water Service ea.Addit.200' 15.00 information given is eotTed, that i am the owner or authorized agent of the owner, ftt plana submitted are in compliance with State laws,that I Stam d Rain Drain 1st 100' 30.00 am registere<1 with the Cunsbuction Contractor's Board,that the number Stam R Rain Drain Addit. 100' 15.00 given is rxx;w 1. (If exempt from State registration, ploase give reason below.) Mobile Home Space 25.00 - ---— ---.- ----- - _ _ -- ---- FrRk Flow revention- --— -- Device or Anti-Pollution Devirx? 7.50 Any I rap or Waste o -.- ----- ---- - Connected to a Fixture 7.50 T3escn s work new`-LT'aadian T a ra eon I - repair -- I.)be done residential p nor,residential Q -- 40.00 -' In.,p.of Exist. Plumbing per hr Specially Requested Inspections per hr Existing use ofa1T�Sin, single family — -- building or property — -- - �— filing 15.00 e`s&ntiaTbackflow prevenbon _._- proposed use of dev�es �---- — - - 15.00 - hullding rr property _-- xcep resrc-'Ten7r"a71sc ow--- prevention devices) NOTICE •lrlinimurr,Fee$25.00 SUBTOTAL nERMITS BECOME VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION 5%SURCMROE AU1NORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS,OR IF r'ONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED , FOR A PERIOD Or- 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK!S PLAN REVIEW 25%OF SUBTOTAL3 03 11311 COMMENCED. - --- TOTAL Rperial C'•onrliitions --- - — Date issued by Wnuunr LItY OF TWAHD -- IIIE-CTIP'l OF PAYMt, Nt Rk('.L-, I I'l NO. r,.y4-rtet-p3wA-4 CHF-04 WoUN'T 1 tb/6. P.16 wu;rN.RN PLUMBING GASH AMIJUNT o 0. ov.1 PAYMENT DATE t 06/iv.'8/94 bIJBI)I V I S I ON 'mPOSE OF PAYMENT AMOUNT PAID PURPOf-iF. OF PA 0MC)UNI VIA 1 1x:1.::.. 50 PLAN CHECK 1-$�. 13 IAIJ I I V PEN 60. 63 i iAli 11 4iW DW4FMu1.1lH ST ill(04L 14MOUNI PkID 6. 2.6 MIT CITY CSF BUILDIIGARD reFr'My" 4 . . . PER .. . : BU�CJ4 -000 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OPTE TSSUED! 06/22/94 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 97223*8199 (502)$20-41.71 '-3 1 T L (ari V rr*".)S. . . ; 14"'f35!:., 5W IMIRTINUUTI-I S r'JSD1VTS'!ON4 . . . : PALMER ACRES 'ZONING.' C'--•G PD LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . I R 1-7:1 1 S ro,U T FLOOR AREAS r,.XTERIOR WALL- CONSTRUCTION CLASS OF WORK. :NCW FrPc " . . ! 135408 s N: S. E.- W: TYPP QF ljqr:-:. r.OM 1317COND. s DPOT17CT nDFNTNIGS?--- TVW OF CONST. :13M THIRD. :56P, s N. S- E- W. OCCUPANCY ORF'. :112 TOTAL s Poor CONST:A FT RE RET" -' OCCUPPNCY LOAD:3635 EASEMENT. : sf AREA SEP. RATEDe STOR. I t IT. '30 rt 3 GARAGE. . . - sf OCCLI !.mr. RATED: 1H BS M T 7 MEZZ7:Y RE0.1) F"r1op I-000). . . . : Pg f I. F--FT rt RGHT- ft FIR 3PKL:Y 1,3MOV' DET. . :Y DWELLING UNITS! FRNTv ft REARi ft FIR PL.RM!,N HNDICP ACC:Y B rZ D r M 5, anTHS: IMP SURFACE,-,00 PRO COP P.hl t' VALUE. $: 4784766 RemarKst Custco Store- new retail building NO C OF 0 UNITIL ALL CONDI-rIONG OF 1301793-00113 HAVE FEEN SAT ISr"ED. ON SITE WATER DUAI.-ITY. TOTAL $105, 627. 0.0. Malys Trans : $7, 909. 00, Indl-istrial ,TIF" $97, 718. 00, FEEC, PRICE/C09TC0 type Allot-nt by date ro(-Pt 1P0TH AVE NE PRMT t 1;::,.144.. 9E 93-246RS!", PLCK $ 7910. 62 12/22/03 93-246805 1'1RVNLnND WA 113083 5PCT $ 607. 25 12/22/ )3 13 -2/,6M8!! Phone #: 206-881-7600 TIED $1056f2'7. 00 Slm 0h/22/94 - E. LEE 901ITNCSON CONSTRUCTION '7320 SW HUNZTKER ST. SUITE 300 T'k'GW#) '-- '"', 23 --------------------------------- r1hons #: 645--8911 $126289. 79 TOTAL Reg #. . . ,:,314'7 REPUT RED TNSPECTIOW1 This pervit is issued subject tT the regulations cintained in the F-oct/Fol.mci Tn-sp Mi 5r_.. Inspection Tiqa-d Municipal Code, State of Dre. Specialty Lodes and all rthet F,tr%Ltc Steel Insp Final Inspertlt--, amlicab4 lawn, All work wi'11 be dare in accordance with Qpinf Steel. Insp approved plans. This peroit will expire if work is not started Slab Insp within 18! days of issuance, or if work is suspended for oare Masonry Insp IN days. Framinq Tnsp Roof nailng InTr, Trismiition Tn— Firewall Insp Permittee rignaturt*: Gyp Soard Insp ....... I ,31.tsp Cr_ ilng Insp Tss4jed Pyt nppr/sdwi!( In 7p Call f'or inspection 639-4175 CITE' OF TIGARD P-F-RM:1 1 T C-r CUMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PERMIT 0. . . . . . . : SWR94-016'. 13126 SW Hall Blvd.Tigird, Irogen 972;es-6109 (SW)6110.411711 DATE ISCUFDi Q16/22/94 PPRCI!L - IS136r—D-02POO `F nrpDRESS. . 07."55 SW DARTMOUTH ST .UBDIVISION. . . . : PALMER ACPL:S 70NINGe C-G PD, VLOCR. . . . . .. . . . . : LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . .. I TENANT NAME. . LISP Nn. . . . . . . . . . I FXTURE LINT 75. -C-.86 CL(13C OF WORN,. . . :NEW DWELL.1 NG [IN I T9. . -2 TYPE OF UGE—, . . zCOM NC OF BUILDINGS. INrTALL TYPE. . . . :BUGWR IMPERV SURFqCr-. . : Remarks: Costco Storer- new retail bUilding TOTAL. TTF .- $105, 627. 00, Mar,s- 1'1 .-i5: t71901. 00, InJi-istrial TIF; $97, 718. 00, C)Anel-' FEES VIULVANNv PPPTNIERSHIP ltvpe amn'-lnt by date rPrp+-- i2-,.wOO NORTHRUP WAY PRM7 4400. 010 SW 716/22/94 I Nr:sP t 4n. 0171 qW 06/2^!94 IPA 9SfV5 CONTRACTOR NOT (INI rTLE t 4445, 00 TOTni- REDUIRED TNL;PECTI0N9 TNA,.AVqji-c&r1 sosews to coo-1v with, 01, the rules and riqullations S,,wer Tnspectic)n of the Unified Sewage Agency. The pervit expires 180 ela/g from tht date issued, The teal asnunt paid will be furfe'ted if the oftrit ey-i'l— '- Q.,or:y does not guarantee the accuracy of Ve ,ids sewer laterils. Ir the sewer is not located at the veaSnr"vftt g r ilpen, the installer Oallprospect 3 fee� ir all directions frog the distance giver. If riot so located, the rst.iler shall purchase a "7*9 and Side S4vllr, Dprgit and the Agrly ,ill lr,tyll a lateral. - e,.-,m i t e P 9 J,U n-4 t U. .0 Call for inspection 63'1-417!j LA 'A LI UY CIV 1 I134RD IPT 617 1JAYMF'NT kk=AA.11•`T NO. v94•--Pl5-4,l4b GFIECK HM0IJN'T 444,*. 00 i`1ra1!W: s ROBINSON G'0N09 T RUt;t 1 I:1N !,11, G145P. 14MIJLIN7 s V!. txlfEl "1IT F'flii s '7:3PO .:;W HL1N711.1WR SUT 1 T .300 PAYMENT UA'T 1~ a 06/PP/94 TTNARD, OR SUFl1)TVlslc)N e 9 72ela— 1'I INPOSF`. OF FAAY OJU N'1 AMOUNT PAI D PLIRP('113k. OF PAYMF'N T VIM01 IN 1 P54.1 1) 1 4 UW4 f3WR94-..09 64 4409.1. M Sf:-Wf R )NSPF CT 4fi. 00 113TCD/7855 DAR T MOI_I M 444t%. 00 Construction Inspection & :'elated Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF GX 12 CONCIRE TL TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: A (_ 72 iC 1 2 j 1 /C"39/ '31 ! 1 4 3! 23 _ _ _ _- Phone(503)684-3460 FAX k 684-0954 Date Molded: O V!i L ,1y ';04 Job No. ;`'�t `'z� Permit No: --- Client: -___ UIyTF 1EU ;,,LI ERAGE AGENCY INSPEC1 I(All '1 PARI MFNT Projo,;t: — DURPAM WWI I '_�lUP2ORT FA-.1 l T T TF''. - Address: IIGARD UR Contractor. RON CUIVa T R1JCT!ON _--Sub Contractor: LEE IRE.OFERN Concrete Supplier: LONE 51 Ali NOR T 11WL:iT __Truck No. -_ -'___.__..- _Ticket No. _ _1`�24D5 Cast 9y: ED DAY Cu.Yds. -- _-' _--_---Load No. --- -------- Weather: - OVERCA�1 - Temp.High: 70 _Temp Lo v: -'�' ---- Location of Placement GATE^ ISLAND & STLPS EAST ':LGE L)F FDC MARKLR FOR DURHAM SUPPORT — FACILITY . _Teat Tlme: 9:0 0 Concrete Tamp: 4000 Uengtn Requirement PSI O days Slump - CementT1I No./No.Sarr.s 4`,UO;4000 ODOT Air Content _ ' '1 - Max.Aggregate 3/`} Admix.Ar•ount: -_._Brand: -Admix.Amount: _ Brand: Set Test® Regiater Date Date Total Area Unit Repport Tested No. Days Number Recd Test - Load PSI IV o. By 7 5595 06/17 (1E. .- : 1.23, 990 28. 26 4390 59 --1 ,J t1 28 5595 Oce/17 0 7/J.,'i 155,630 28. 29 5500 60 JB e-0 S,595 06/17 07/1 1 160, 520 18 . 29 5670 60 JB Ik)LD 28 ::;595 Of-,/17 07/14 158, 630 28. 29 5610 60 JB Remarks: cc :CII-( OF T1Gf)f-11; Hi):-I_NG114.1 1:11h SPECIFICATIONS NOTE3 CYLS. @ _7 DAYS AND 3 CYLS_ rd 28 DAYS. _HOWEVER_ LATE ARRIVAL & NON FAMILIARITY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 1RODUCE 4 TOTAL CYLS. BATCH WEIGHT TICKET NOT AVAILABLE, W /C RATIO NOT CALCULATED. POUR — UNDERWAY WHEN INSPECTOR ARRIVED, CONTRACTOR STATED THAT 10 GALLONS - WAS -x'13-4,ElAT OV-199P1G-Fi9TE -- Information oorlvh heron Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. UI TV OF T IUAR1) FSI (.,F'IPT OF PAYW.141 RIA-4. 11-!T NO. t94-PIS3574 C'HF,GK NMOUN f s Io. ow fF ih1l a PRMF F f.;CIS` CO I::H!;W AMOUN 1 t (f1, OlD -1lFIPl+3Fi s I0f 011 1 eNT11, NE. PHYNkN I DATE r Of,/Jt,/'4 K I RKI._ANU, WA SUM)I l Sl CIN a 4 El�..�.i••5KFN.'.k P1.1HPUISF: OF PAYMEINY Fihh 11.IN1 PICA D PURPOS) I:IF PO rW N 1 MMOLIN 1 V,1411i hIFVO,': TRANSI Y IF FFES 7901). (10 1NUU6i IF1I. 15"F F E.k y77IfI. t7W1 1!,111:1 TIF 1 111 Fal-. AMONT PAID 00 CITY OF TIGARD June 15, 1994 ORrGON Joel Yamauchi Mulvanny Partnerphip, Architects P.S. 12200 Northup Way Bellevue, WA 38005 Re: Costco Conditions of Approval Dear Mr. Yamauchi : ThP City's Permit Coordinator Jerree Gaynor states that you have requested an itemized review of the conditions of approval. These conditions of approval have yet to be signed off from applicable City departments. The following is a list of conditions of approval yet to be completed: Portions of condition of approval 422 have not yet been completed. e) The site plan shows bicycle parking racks at the south east corner of the building entrance. The bicycle rack design still is to be reviewed by the Planning Division. The bicycle racks need to be dispersed at points near the building entrance for user convenience. f) This condition required a variance to be filed to reduce the number of required loading spaces as set forth in the Community Development Code. This still needs to be done. o) This condition has been modified based on the recommendations of the City Arborist, Mr. Floyd Peoples, who recommended that a total of seven trees be relocated. The landscape plan still needs to be modified to show the location of the trees to be relocated and the location, size and number of. Cedar and Fir trees to be planted along the wetlands area as a buffer area. Condition of approNal 424 requires a temporary easement for the creation of a pedestrian easement from SW Dartmouth Street to properties to the north, south, and east. Please provide evidence of completion of this condition. Condition of approval 1125 requires that an escrow account be set up for a pErmenant pedestrian easement. Provide evidence of completion of this condition. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, Mark Roberts Assistant Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 5394171 TDD (503) 584-2772 Carlson Testing, Inc. construction Inspection>���ultng REPORTOF 6X 12_ CONCRETE 'FEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 HSTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: �_—____ —_—�-_ __ Phone(503)684-9460 — FAX k 684-0954 06/01 94 94-1566 Date Molded: --- — 19_---__ Job No. -- -- Permit No: _ - - -- - -- PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client: _-_ -- --- - COSTCO TIGARD STORE Project: —_ --- — — -- -- - - -- TIGARD OR Address: -- -------- - ROBINSON C9NSTRUCTION BENILY CONSTRUCTION Contractor. --- -- ---- Sub Contractor: _----- —-- -.�- - -- ----- ROSS ISLAND SAND & GRAVEL 35 T-459733 Concrete Supplier: ___ — Truck No. ___ __Ticket No. — -- B . O 'CONNOR 2 2 Cast By: —__ _— - _-- -.- Cu.Yds. ----------Load No. _.—,--.— - SUNNY 4,:> Weather: High -Temp.Low: _— POUR 42 FOR SAN . ON DARTMOUTH . Location of Placement: — --- - - - -- ----- 1 :4 , 6,0 --Test Time: -- Concrete Temp: --- 5000 28 4 Strength Requirement: --.--- -- -----------.--- PSI 4i - --- days Slump _._Cernentlype ---------- 52108 /4 " Mix No./No.Sacks -Air Content - -. — - -- Max.Aggregate VR Admix.Amount: _-- Brand: --_ ___Admix.Amount: -___ __ _.. -__ -grand: ._- -_ — Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load _ PSI _ No. - By I ti 5423 06/02 06/06 85,334 28.26 3020 2 JB 28 5423 06/02 06/2S 128 ,430 28 . 31 4540 4 JB 28 5423 06/02 0712 cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: -ROQI1�?SDI�-l_L)N5TM=ItJN_r_T r_-- _ — -- information contained herein Is not to be reproduced,except In full,witl,out prior authorization from this offlae. Construction Inspection 6 Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Dor 23814 ASTM C172/C143/C1064/C1231/C31iC39 Tigard,Oregon 97261 Test Methods: Fhone(503)684-3460 FAX"684-0954 06/01 94 94-1566 Date Molded: ------ , 19 Job No. - Permit No: ---- - - ---- Client: -- PRICE COSTCO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP _ - COSTCO TIGARD STORE Project: -- _. — _— -- ---- — -- TIGARD OR Address: --- -- - — -- - -- ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION BENTLY CONSTRUCTION Contractor: - --------------Sub Contractor: -- ROSS ISLAND SAND & GRAVEL 35 T-4597'33 Concrete Supplier: `__ ---- Truck No. _— Ticket No. B . O 'CONNOR 2 2 Cast By: - - ----- ---Cu.Yds. .___ Load No. _ -- SUNNY 77. 42 Weather: _..__-- — __ -Temp.High: - Temp.Low: — --- POUR #2 FOR SAN . ON DARTMOUTH . Location of Placement: ---- --- --- - 1 :45 60 Test Time: - -_Concrete Temp: 5000 - 28 4 " - - Strength Requirement: — -.- —PSI ® - --days Slump --_---Cement Type S210B 3/4 " Mix No./No.Sacks - -- --Air Content -- - -- Max.Aggregate _----- ------- VR Admix.Amount: — _Brand: ` Admix.Amount: .------.Brand: Set Test® Register Date DateTotal Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Rec'd TestL85,334 Load - PSI No. Bv— I 5423 06/02 06/06 28.26 3020 2 JB 28 5423 06/02 06/2 128 ,430 28 . 31 4540 4 JB 56 5423 06/02 07 /2 143,450 28.34 5060 201 JB cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: ---T?OF TNT UTIUN (-(J ----- --- Infonnatlon contained herein Is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE AND BEAVERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT • 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive• P.O. Box 4755 • Beaverton, OR 97076• (503) 526-7469• FAX 526-2538 May 27, 1994 Joel Yamauchi Mulvanny Partnership 12200 Nortbup Way Bellevue, Washington 98005 Re: Tigard Costco 7855 S.W. Dartmouth 609OA-164-000 Dear Mr. Yamauchi: This is a Fire and .Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and ether local ordinances and regulations. Plans numbered A-1, A-la, A-8, accompanying specifications for fire protection, and a complete set of plans of reduced size building, submitted through Tigard Building Department, are conditionally approved subject to the following: 1 . Would request mcving hydrant at the southeast corner to approximately 40 feet east. This gives more width to maneuver fire department equipment past other fire department ec .li.pment parked -'jacent to this hydrant . 2 . Installation and testing of underground water line shall comply with National Fire Protection Association Standard 24 . A fire department inspector shall inspect the piping and witness all tests. Tes4s shall be performed with joints open, and backfilled between. After completion of testing, a Contractor's Material and Test Certificate shall be completed and submitted to this office for permanent. file. Please provides 24 hour notification for witness of tests,. Requests shall be made through Tigard Building Department using the building permit number and their "inspection request" recorder. "WorklnR"Smoke Detectors Save Lives r I Joel Yamauchi May 27, 1994 Page 2 3 . Some provisions need to be provided for access to the velocity bail drip which needs to be installed in the lowest point of fire department connection piping to drain this piping. Access needs to of a size that the velocity ball drip can be physically inspected and maintained operable as needed. Further correspondence Trill be forthcoming wiLi: reviews of the .site plan for this facility. Appro,.a1 of submitted plans is not an approval of omissions or cversight_s by t�iis office or of non-compliance with any appli^able regulations of local government. If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 526-2502 . Sincerely, Gene Birchill, L;WM Plans Examiner GB:kw cc: City or Tigard Building Department �/� DAZE: -- — PLANS CHECK NO.: PROJECT TITLE: CCIUNTYWIDE — TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: �,- WORKSHEET MAIUNGAU by— (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY UD1RESS: SES) y+L 1Lr e1 —L --),�� CRY/21P/PHONE: HATE PERK/�i� l�/ _. �D — ND $E CATEGORY _ TRIP 1 AX MAP NO.: RESIDENTIAL $152.00 / ,3 lv C [� L Z 0 a _�1SINESS AND COMMERCIAL _-_$38.00 SITUS NO.ADDRESS: ,5- INDUSTRIAL 147.00 S v/° 9 - 00 i /�u Jam' 1 I- ooel INSTITUTIONAL — $63.00 PAYMENT ;METHOD: CA—'H/CHECK -- CRI.DIT INSMUTIONAL ONLY: BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOT LAND USE CATEGORY OESCRIPTION Of USE vEEKOAY AVCL TRIP PAT WEEKEND AVE TRIP RATE I DEFER TO OCCUPANCY , U — BASIS: CALCULATIONS: 111 ew C'r e d. S \_ — T5 1.T,� t s ,; loJ ,: l q 7 = T-1 f= 7/ � j`,5� A/ /(),5- In 2 Jr PROJECT TRIP OEl MAITON: zz 05 .2 ADDrnO k-NOTES: FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY: RI.:.n AMT.: IT,IANCfT AMT.:tP i+5 , C/o �, v Cc. WASHINGTON COUNTY ~�— — TIF NOTEBOOK �/ form tift0 INSPECT.Lfl �TICB Cit? of Tigard Building Departaunt 13125 M ®all Blvd. Tigard, OMTq M 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-0-Ph7nnelc 639-4175 Business Phone. 639.411i1 Inspections __ `J I Footing Plbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Appr/sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINALS Poet/Reaca Struct. San. sewer Framing -Bldg. Poet/Roam Mech. Rain Drain Insulation -plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Mater Line Gyp. Rd. -Hoch. Date Requeeteds p :�m'0 c P AM / / PM Addreee: �i7 . Pemit 9 r �(/W Builder: THE FOLLONINo CORRECR'IONs ARE REQUIRED, ^J 1 /3 / - OU _ 4�-►�_��1�► 1'�-war- i� !/VG[_ --fir_ ' _ w v 4 _ sy,nrrr,�, e a -- __- - Inipectort v � _ APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE —`Call For Reinsp. _T 1 •1 k � « 1. .� � I 1 — �- �! • I t�In. , ' ��1.�\ 1 916-489-1044 P1q;P-%4gFFER S PSWC ARR • SHAFFER & ASSOCIATES � "�: jlt;ilQ Simctunl I!nglnaers CalCuurEo ev QQV f 7 C. it ./,,I reS - (a le �-lr Ap � oodG• eeW = ��, an ,� ��)5r r z �- U� RE CF REGON/ Carlson Testing, 1n.c. Construction Inspection &Related Test (Geotechnical Consulting R'EE_Q OP6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C143/Cln64/C1231/C231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 05/19 94 94---1566 Date Molded: , 19 Job No. Permit No: — -------- PRICE COSTO C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Client: -- -- - - -- ---- - Project - COSTCO TIGARD STORE - TIGARD OR Address: —.- - - ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION Contractor. Sub Contractor. Concrete Supplier. L_ Tn Ticket No. — ROSS ISLAND SAND & GRAVE4A N%1 202 T--459180 Cast By: - L3. S U M I N S K I Cu.Yds. 11 Load No.1 --- RAIN 65 40 Weather: Temp.High: Temp Low: --_ SANITORY SEWER STREET CAT . Location of Placement: --- — — - 72 -------Test Tame: _ Concrete Temp. SOOO Strength Requirement: ---- - PSI days Slump Cement Type — 52108 a p Mix No./No.Sacks -- Air Content - ---- Max.Aggregate --.-- 118 Admix.Amount __ Brand: Admix.Amount: —Brand: _--.--..--- Se1 si a Register Date Date Total Unit Report Tested No. nays Number Rec'd Test Load Area PSI No. By 7 5284 05/25 05/2- 128,200 26.26 4540 1 JB 28 5284 05/25 Oh/"lt 28 5284 05/25 0C /1 r_.r :C.I TY OF f IGARD Remarks: iR -rrr— Information contained herein is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. Q'y /� 7477 SW Tech Center Drive � \Z A AGRA, Inc. Portland, Oregon 97223-8024 (Formerly Rittenhouse-Zeman &Associates, Inc.) (503) 639-3400 Engineering & Environmental Services FAX (503) 620-7892 May 9, 199421-OW _>A 55 0q-, -z�trl0u k-b-, '5fr' Mulvanny Partnership Architects P.S. 12200 Northrup Way Bellevue,Washington 98005 Ann: Ronald Maddox SUBJECT: ADVENDUM TO SOILS REPORT LIMITED USE OF 1.5 TO 1 SLOPES ROCKERY WALL REPLACEMENT PROPOSED COSTCO PROJECT TIGARD,OREGON Dear Aon- At the request of Rick Martin of W&H Pacific, we have reviewed the new grading plan for the proposed Tlgard Costco project. We are aware that a 1.5 horizontal to 1 vertical slope has been designed for a much of the east end of the site. We feel that such a fill slope Is allowable in this context as long as the slope Is over built and excavated back to firm material anti that surface erosion control Is placed Immediately after grading. At no I,,)Int should these fill slopes be steeper than 1.5HAV. In addition, we understand that a structural retaining wall (some sort of reinforced soil gravity combination wall) is being designed to replace the rockery. We welcome the replacement of the rockery at the heights indicated. We have provided soils parameters to the wall designers and are working with them on their design. If you require further information,please gall. We look forward to future Invo+.Iement on this project. Respectfully Submitted, RZA AGRA,INC. r �j.C. l;LS'n J ; 431 Sivart Albright, P. Senior Geotechnl Engineer R AGRA «T Earth&Enotonrnental Group �9-20-94 01 , 32PM FROM PERFORMANCE CONTRACT i0 9662611 POwon A MARR-SHAFFOR & ASSOCIATES Page No. .1 Consulting Structural Englnesrs _ Date. April 21, 1994 Twical Ceiling Seismic Bracing JOB NAME: PCC Cascade Killingworth Ave Portland, Oregon CLIENT: Pertormance Contracting INC PHONE NUMBER: 503 684 5533 ADDRESS: 8015 South-west Hunziker FAX NUMBER: 503 684 ?,627 Tigard, Oregon 97223 CONTACT: Jeff Hipp PROF fS KOFESS/Q DESIGN CRITERIA: �5 GINE f/Q `�02 $ (<^1 D 1 U. G. B ' Standard 1) CODE: 991 U ( J8t3 U G 2) GRID: OX-26 /r Q J 3) ZONE: 3 N 4) OCC : 1.0 EXP. 6/30/97 5) SHIRE: 12 ga �`r 15 19 ro #r S I 6) PART?: Ceiling Doss Not Brace Partitions '�)PtJCYtJ��' ®lav Wlre Summary OF C;A1# Maximum area to be supported by each 4-way wire splay group is 304 square feet with the first splay wire group with in eight (8) feet of perimeter of ceiling, and spaced at sixteen (16) feet by eighteen (18) feet on center. The following calculations are to determine the maximum ceiling area which can be laterally supported by one.four-wire splay brace when Donn DX-24, OX-26 and RXM (either PXM512 or RXM612) ceiling grids are used The following conditions are considered 1) Ceilings in seismic zone 2B, 3&4 2) Occupancy importance factors of 1.0 and 1.25 3) 55 ksi splay wires, either 12 gage or 10 Hage. 4) Ceiling weight with or without loads from partitions. Ma>'tlmum partition height of 9'-0" and a minimum partition spacing of 12'-0'on center. There are four wires per bracing group The wires make an angle to the horizontal plane of no more than 450. An earthquake can come from any direction, therefore the total force delivered to any wire group -^ust be taken by one wire. Ceilings= 4 0 psi Partitions =Q_§a Q ft x(2 x 2 8 psf(1)+Qom_.1(2))- 2 3 psf Post-it'"Fax Note 7671 13816 P g;=I. 12011 1.33 � From Ceilings bracing partitions=4.0+2 3 8 3 Pat co�o.�. Co. A4 C-e N�)TE5 Ph"tr it (1)518-inch gypsum wall board each side of the wall. pax a Flus• (2)20 gage x 3-515 inch sleet stud at 18 inches on center 88`88 MAHR-SHAFFER & ASSOCIATES Page No. :2 Consulting Strjgctural Engineers Date: April 21, 1994 411oweble Force on 12 Vigo wlr : Fy_55 0 ksi Ft- 6(55 (3)=33 Oksi Awire=rc(.106)2 /4=00882 in2 Allow Diagonal Force to wire = .00882(33.(V.1)(1 33) =3870 Allow Horizontal Force to wire= .707(387) =2740 (placed ai max angle of 450) Allowgble Farce on gpjLa wl,e; Fy=55 Oksi Ft=6(55 0)=33 Oksi Awire=:nt( 135)2/4 = 0143in2 Allow Diagonal Force to wire = .0143(33,000)(1 33) = 6280 Allow Horizontal Force to wire - .707(628) = 4440 (placed at max angle of 45") Allowable Force on Ceiling Runners Test Values Control See Design 1 Main Tee Cross Tee Value note 1 If, Value Grid T e Tenslon Comp. Tension _ Corrp note 2 DONN OXF-29 320# 4780 3510 _3261 2740 2740 _274# DONN DX-24 _ 320_0 4780 3510 32030 274# 2.74/ _2740 nnAJM OX-�'B _.�_ a 7 7I1 7 DOWN RXM 3710 3300 3510 32U 3260 3260 3260 NOTES 1. As one-half of runners are in tension and one-half in compression, multiply Test Values x 2 0 2 Factor of Srlety=2 0 Summary Since the values for DX-24 ,DX-26 and OXF-29 are greater than the 12 gage vire, the allowable load for 12 ge wire governs for most conditions. RXC cross tees are used with RXM main tees. Later1t11 Forct_QejerminotIon: Fp=ZK_'.pWp Fp=Des3ign Value above Z=O 4 (Zone 4),0 3(zone 3).or 0 2(zons 2) Wp=•A'(Wceiling +Wpartitions) 1=1 Dor 1 25 (,p=075 AyTM(= FD Wceiling= 4 0 PSI ZICp(Wceil+NSA) Wparlilions =2 313sf Tyaical Allowable Area Determination: Example 1 : UX-26 12 gage wire, Zone 3. 1=1 (l, no partitions AsYsax= ___V4L_ =304 ft2 0 3(1.0x.75)(4.0ps() Example 2 : RXM, 12 gage wire, zone 3, 1=1 25, with partitions Amax=.__ 2740 =113 K2 0 3(1.25x.75)(4 Opst+2 3psf) Example 3 : RXM, 10 page wire, zone 3, 1=1 0, with partitions Amex- - 3280 -230112 0 3(1.0)(.75)(4.Ops3f.f 2 3) ' 09-20-94 01 ,32PM FROM PERFORMANCE CONTRAIT 10 968267^ P003/003 I MARR-SHAFFER & ASSOCIATES Page No. :4 r Conselling Structural Engineers Date: April '?1, 1994 Compression post calculation Since the maximum slenderness ratio (KIJr)is 210. the resulting Euler Buckling stress, dwided by a`actor of safety of 23/12 Is. Fa =(12(rt2)29e6(1 33)) /(23(2002))=4970 psi The following calculations are basad on a DONN DX26 ceiling grid the maximum vertical force Is 2740 (see p 2) Use 1/2"0 EMT for maximum length 4'-0" A=0 088 ir,%2 r=0.238 in Lmax=200(0 238)-47,6- f,,=2741 10 088 int-3114 psi Use 3/4"0 EMT for maximum length 6'-2" A=0 134 int r-0 309 in Lmax-200(0 309)=61 8' fa_274f'/0 134 inn ;2045 psi Use t" 0 EMT for maximum length 6'-6" A=O 198 in2. r=0 392 in Lmax=200(0 392)=78 4' fa=2740/0 198 m2 = 1384 psi l U%a 1-5/80x25gni. SS metal etude for maximum length 7'-2" A=0 070 Int ry=0 430 in Lma,y,=200(0.430)= 6.0' fes274r 10 078 Int - 3513 psi Use double 1-5/0"x25ga. SS metal studs (see detail below) maximum length 11'-5" A=0.078 int rx=0 686 in Lmax=200(0 696)=13� fa-2740 10 078 Int =3513 psi Use double 2.1/2"05ga. SS metal etude (see detail below) maximum length 16'-10" A=0 094 int rx-1 011 in 1-max=200(1 011)=202" 1a=2740/0 094 irt2 = 2915 psi Uee double 3-1/2"x2Sga. SS etude for (see detail below) maximum length 22'-8" A=0 113 int rx=1 359 in Lmax=200(1 359)-272' 18=2740 10 113 irt2 = 2425 psi #6 SD9T screws @ 18" O.C. J J)ttgil. Double Stud t_----- - ------ - ----------- --- -------- ------------------ a PXRYCRXuWM now APR 1 .9 a nand mo- !)/94-3H,,, PWN ALL NRN NY 'THER-9 VR998NCs, tUt We Robinson Construction Co. _,�� as rrincipsl, a1Ld safes` jur_ane m of , cozlsar�stim duly authorised to connduat a general surety bmiNair n tR BCat• Of 0re9M, ss Surety, are Jointly and Severally held b=4 unto the CiW of Tigard, OrW*A, a ==icipality of t1w State of Oregon, Wwainarter called �bligeo, Ln thye 5199 of 9 F,o'ov***, *��. IfWftl manner of the United States of AmartCA, for the 94YMEaaot of Wdieh ars, ae trinCfpRl, and as surety, Jointly and severally bind ouarselven. our successats and assigns firmly by these present. TB.E CONDITIONS OF THIS BOM AND OBL.IGATIM xS SUCH, that the Prinoipals axe grading and installing erosion control inprovW44Ats in - TuJara located in the Cit•' OT Tigard, Dregaon, n aceos ce th a gra nor plan approved by the City of Tigard. oreg i. ", THWEVORE, if the Priacip&l harein shvill faithfully and truly observe and coMly With all term 4MG conditions of the Approved grading pllan and shall well and t"Iy perform all matters and t"s under"ken to be poxfoYmHd under all ordinances, regulatime xnC contdit ons of the abiigee applicarble to said deveiopwnt and fsgorcrvement, and shall promptly make p2aymmts to all persons s�lyinq labor or isata! .ial for any of the wor). provided by said agreataent, and !hail sot yu=it any lien or claim to be. tiled ar prosecuted against the Cb1luee, t1han thiol obliBstion sLaall ha void, othervi ee to remain in full forces ud effect_ rn the cvmt of suit or wtion be f iled by the otligee heretwaor to mforca na ld contract or to reemmr under the teens of this band, in addition to a7.1, other rights and remedies, the City, in the event it shall p,cwail, shall be entitled to roe.-Yves such Gams to the Court Voy adixAm reascmable as and for attorney'n fees. W M1*.[MNS WHZRP.OF, the pa,Ctiea9 hereto bALvp caused chis b¢md to be executed this 16th day of April ROB 1 TRI ON C 1� ., Principal B I I jL c s W! -- Weal . Sea l til teJQ NW Of Che Pow, Of AttorrW SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMFh1c'A WiSt tm attached to the original of � • y _- F� J Y t'' Zj': Stacy A. Aft nn 112 .MfJ<Citr1inda Way i� e+41:t IH1° •,i�1e1M11 ++�4t,el�.tMe Lake Oswego, OR 97035 ® POWER SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA OF ATTORNEY NOME OFFICE: SAFECO PLAZA !� SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98185 No. 950.4 KNOW ALL RY THESE PRESENTS: That SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, each a Washington corcoratfon, does each hereby appoint .........■.....STACY A. FLYNN, Portland, Oregon■ ■■ ■■■*■r■■■■■■■en■■■■rr■r■■r■■■er•■■■■rrrrrr■ its true and lawful attorneys)-in-fact. with full authority to execute on its behalf fioetity and surety bonds or under*akings end utter documents of a similar character issued in the course of its business, and to bind the respective company thereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERr1L IWSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA have each execute(, and attested these proSents this 4th day of January 1A 93 CERTIFICATE Extract from the By-Laws of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA: "Article V. Sectiart 13. - FIDELITY AND SURETY BCNOS . . . the Presider,t, any Vice President. the Secretary, and any Assistant Vice President appointed for that purpose by the officer in charge of surety operations. shall enh have aunt,ority to appoint individuals as attorneys-in-fact or under other appropriate Utles with authority to execute on behalf of the company fidelity and surety bonds and other documents of similar character issued by the company in the course of Its business . . . On any Instnment making or evidencing Such appointment, the signatures may be affixed by facsimile. On any instrtment conferring such authority or on any bon,: or undertaking Of the company, the seat, or a facsimile Mereof, may be impressed or affixed or in any other manner reproduced: provided, however, that the seal shall not be necessary to the validity of any such instrunart or undertaking," Extract from a Resolution of the Board of Directors of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA adopted July 28. 1070, "On any cLutificate executed by the Secretary or an assistant secretary of the Company setting out, (i) The provisions of Article V, Section 13 of the By-Laws, and (ii) A copy of the power-of-attorney appointment, executed pursuant thereto, and (ill) Certifying that sant power-of-attorney appointment is in full force and offece, the signature of the certifying officer may be N facsimile, and the seal of the Corrivany may be a facsimile tnereot I, R. A. Pierson, Secretary of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMEPiCA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, do hereby certify that the foregoing extracts of the By-Laws and of a Resolution of the Board of Directors of these corporations. and of a Power of Attorney issued pur!uant thereto, are true and correct, and that both the By-Laws, the Resolution and the Power of Attorney are still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the facsimile seal of said corporation this _._.1 t=11 day of - Aturil 1Q 94 • r^' ti�+� ` CORPORATE JJ 5 ' x a n n PILfIl a, crr.W rnn, (023�ah S-07UEp 1107 19r ` ' 1a elbtu u War Registered trademark of SAFECO Corporation. RECFIu►::i.. ROBINSON APR 1 31994 CONST RUCTION CO. COMMUNITY UL%LIU,MLwi April 12, 1994 Mr. David Scott Mr. Mark Burrows City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 972.23 Re: Costco Tigard Job No. 9428 Gentlemen: Valuation of site erosion control and re yrading if required at any steep banks would be as follows: I. Hydro Seeding 14.86 acres x 1,000/acres - $14,860.00 2. Cost to re grade banks to safe slopes 10,000.00 Total estimated value for Surety Bond $24,860.00 Please review this value and approve. Please call or fax approval or for any changes that need to be oracle to this value before issuance of bond. Sincerely, - 't�d 'VZ Blak . Mills Project Manager BI,M:v jp cc: Randy White - :Price/Costco 21360 N.W. Come!I Road Hillsboro,Oregon 97124-9321 (503)645-8531 FAX (503)645.5357 CITE' GF TIGARD SITE WORK PERMIT COMMPNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP'ART'Ii FNT PERMIT #. . . . . . . : S I T94-00111E 119125 SW Nell Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 97223.6140 (503)09-4171 DATE ISSUED: 03/29/94 PARCEL : 1S1 y6CD-02200 ITE ADDRESS. . . : 0'i 855 SW DARTMOUTH 51' LISDIVISION. . . . : PALMER ACRES ZONING: C—G PI) LOCH.. . . . . . . . . . . LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . : 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YPE OF WORK:NEW PAVING?. . . . . . . . . :Y RE:SO. NO. : kCV VOLUME. :98375 cy GRADING?. . . . . . . . ..Y VALUE. . . 4 : 2100000 ILL.. VOLUME. : 142000 cy LANDSCAPING?. . . . :Y 'NG FILL?. . . . . . :Y SITE PREP?. . . . . - :Y OILS RFT REQD?:Y STORM BRAINS?. . . :Y IMPERV SURFACE. . :643200 sf emarks : permit inr.lUdes all retaining wall, stairways to public streets, ,anc1 ete utilities. wrier: ------ _._____._----.---________—____-- ._____.__ .--- _ FEE,., ULVANNY PARTNERSHIP type amount by date recpt 2200 NORTHRUP WAY PRMT t 5183. 00 JG 03/i_'1/94 - 5PCT $ 259. 1-11 JG 03/21/94 — ELL_EVUE WA 98005 PLCK $ 3368. 95 Jr 03/21/94 — 'hone #: 206-881 - '1600 'ortractore LEE ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION 320 SW HUNZIKER ST. SUITE 300 IGARD 9R 97223 Jh o n e #.- 6415-13531 4 8611. 10 TOTAL 'Pg #. . : 63147 -------- REOUI RE'D INSPECTIONS -- -- — his per:it is issued subjert to the regulations contained in the Erosion Control igard Municipal Code, State of Ore. Specialty Codrs an;' all other Excavation Insp pplicable laws. All work will be done in accordance with Fill Inspec+; inn pproved plans. This permit will expire if work is not started Grading Insp ithin 186 days of issuance, or if work is suspended for sore Strm Drain Insp han IB@ dabs, Final Inspection let-mi.ttee . ssued 9� /10— �— i Call for inspection 639-4175 jj y OF PAYMVN I NO, 194-Pbob'3 3 GA-IFICK AM0UNf a 881.1. tO AMF n G 0 1;1,C 0 (;W41-1 01,10101 V a 0.00 WDRUSS A 10809 1.i?P1111 W POYPIVNI PAI+ KERKI-AND-0 .lLfRP0c4F.. (IF' PAYPWNT A110UNI 11041) OP11111141 POD) I)THO PFRM S 1 T94-0006 !-.:I fA 3.P.0 ST. 1%,1.(1 D Pi R -11AN CHFCK Ft,. tF-501.1 -436A.915 AMOUNt' PAID > Ali 1.1. . 1.41 Comtmercial_Buildir a Permit Aw Aicatioi� City of*Tigard � 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97,223 (503,11639-4171 Jobsite Address: 43If94 Uvo r.) W,4 Tenant: i)7CV Suite --- __...,_ Valuation: _ . Owner: _ ►tc'� o r~� ._.___._. Address: r^ Phone: 4 gel .., �� -iz'_,..�„�.�- -- Eraf�i►s s++:isr�t . _ ,I Contractor: _����_Cu �V_Viv Address: f Al 's Yn'� .�.� Type of «rut: �N Occupancy dans: F hone: rprinklar�? sJ No Contractorst.lronse Si \ � (attach oVy of cunwd Orogon gleno; sq. ft, of proJed:_1 S3, ,3�i story(T!V2nd,ft.) ArchltedlEnlneer: I V r _ FoAl., °1 Proposed use. Addmss: �L2 Zt"C, y U�ta -�-_ 1 Note: Pkimbirg & meG ttnica! plan / rmr# be sutmrlfted at tuna of __.. fe Ile v ,.,,._LVA pa,� _ b,uding permit a[vir-soon. Phone: OOMMENTs: ►! "h �� � �5� ��� Pis, Pao Alaplicant signature Phone nuirrber Received by:_ Date Received: _ _�_ Penult # Account Description Amount Amt. Pd. Bal. Due Bldg. Permit (13UR-D) Plumb. Permit (PLUMB) Mech. Permit (MECH) State Tax (TAX) Bldg: Plumb: Mech: Plan Check (PLANCK) Bldg: Plumb: Mech: Sewer ConneW on (SWUSA) Se . wer Inspection (SWINSP) Parks Dev Charge (PKSDC) Storm DmInage Chg (SDSD(,) Residential TIF (rIF-R) Mass Transit TIF (TIF-MI) Commercial TIF (TIF-C) Industrial TIF (71F-1) Instituflotial TIF (TIF-4$11 Office TIF (TIF-0) Water Quality (WOUAIL) Water Quantity (Wou Fire District (FIRE)., TOTALS MULVanny PflRTnERSHIP A R C H I T E C T S S. March 14, 1994 Dave Scott City of Tigard ' 13125 SW Hall Blva, Tigard, OR 97225 RE: Price/Costco - Tigard, Oregon Building Permit No. 12-50 C MP#: 93-045 Dear Mr. Scott: Per our phone conversation on February 22nd, we request that you authorize the issuance of a building permit prior to your approval of shop drawings from the pre-engineered metal building supplier. The metal building design will be based on the loads and reactions reviewed t by you, which have previously been established for the footing and foundation design. We d understand that all other matters in connection with the building permit have been approved. d Costco is willing to assume in good faith any risk associatc(l with the early issuance of 0. building permit. Costco understands that the issuance of the building permit at this time does not authorize any building construction, and that such construction will only be authorized upon approval of the final shop drawings submitted from the pre-engineered metal building, supplier and approvals fron ,the Ep it cerink Planning Departments. Cost`p also understands that the Building Division side permit separately, whist r ntx' Costco the immediate right to undertake all permit site work ov the property. Thank you for your consid:;ration. If you concur with this letter, please sign below and return a copy to our office. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, MULVINNNY PARTN.RRSHIP r.s. Mitchell C. Smith MC.'S/mk Accepted and Approved By: Rich O - Costs Wholesalef, ol Title ate C—,--Dave t( it f Tigard Title )ate Douglas I. Mulvanny ■ Jeny Quinn Lee ■ Mitchell C. Smith 12200 Northup Way, Bellevue, WA 98005 • (206)881-7600 ■ FAX: (206)869-2563 Plan Review# _12-50C Date 3-14-94 CITY OF TIG�D OREGON Soils Spectal Inspe�_tions This form shali bo signed by the Ow.ier, Engineer or Architect of Record and returned io the Building Divi.sion prior to issuance of the permit. Please note that a separate structural special inspection form may be required Project Address:— 7855 SW Dartmouth ;street __ Project Name:_ Costco _ Architect or Record (Firm): Mulvannv Partnership _ Phone No:_-06s881-7600 Engineer of Record (f=irm):. Engineers- Norttrwest Inc. _ Phone No:_206-525-7650 Soils Engineer: Stuar, ",oprlWyCi. WarrenKraS�er creologist Firm: RZA AGRA Inc. _ Phone Nc 503-620-7892 Lot: Subdivision: The following special inspections shall be performed according to the State Building Code and City of Tigard's Municipal Code Chapter 14.06.010 - 14.06.040: X Engineered Grading (>5,000 cubic yards) - W .. 7014 ❑ Regular Grading - U.B.C. 7014 X Compaction Reports (AASHTO T-180) Testing agency: _-- Phone: ❑ Other ----- The owner hereby agrees to employ the above soils engineer for the above-noted special insp,?talons. Si fur ofOwne'r/e�chitecUo ngineer Print Name_V ���, �7r — -—— Phone W.1Z 7005 Firm_-two �L'� N WY FPAI4EI9� 1��1? _ Date 8M."Hoc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 694-2772 --------------------. - 1 D MAR 994 MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP Plan Review If 12-50C Data 3-14-94 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON 3tr,.rutural Special Inspections The owner or architect or engineer of record shall complete Parts B& D of this form and then return it to the Budding Division for approval prior to Issuance of a building permit. (Please note that a separate soils special inspection form mvy be required and addifional special inspections may be required for contractor design items.) Project Addre«. 7855 SW Dartmouth Street _ Project Name: Costco _ An.hitect of Record (Firm):_ Mulvanny Partnership__ Phone No: 206-881-7640 Enginee -if R»co rd (Firm):_. Engineers- Northwest Inc. Phone No: 206-525-7560 The following special inspections and structural observations shall be perforrrvd according to the State Building C ode and the City of Tigard's Mlrnicipal Code Chapter 14.06.010- 14.06.040 unless a schedule of inspections is submitted by the Engineer of Record and approved by the Building Division. A. X Reinforced Concrete ❑ Prestressed Concre±e X Structural Steel X Structural Masonry, f-m = _� X Welding ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other B. Indicate the special inspector or approved testing agency to perform the special inspections noted in Part A above, including addresses and phone numbers. Submit names, qualifications and certifications of the spPcinl inspectors assigned to the project. The special inspector or inspection agency shall submit a final signed report to the Building Division stating that all items requiring special inspection and testing were fulfiller)and reported and,to the best of his/her knowl6dge, in conformance with the approved design drawings, specifications, approved change orders and the applicable workmanship provisions of the U.B.C. (sew U.B.C.7015 for soils special inspection final report requirements). Items not in conformance, unresolved Items or any discrepancies in inspection coverage (i.e., missed inspections, periodic inspections when conlinun,is was required, etc) shall be specifically itemised in this report. Ll C. ❑ Structural Site Observation by Engineer of Record D. The owner hereby agrees to employ the special inspector, approved testing agency and/or engineer for the above-rioted special Inspections nd/ar structural observation. Slofiluj6 of{?w.nor he A tett or Engineer Acting as the Owner's Agent Print Name—, 12 jx Phone No. "CZ � Firm_-._ LVAW Structurel Plans Examiner signature T 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 ----- -- ---- -- - ____ _-.___ MQ 7rl�t-;y TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE S. RESCUE AND BEAVER"TON FIRE DEPARTMENT 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive• P.O. Box 4755 • Beaverton, OR 97076• (503) 526-2469• FAX 526-2538 March 8, 1994 Joel Yamauchi Mulvar.ny Partnership Architects 12200 N'orthup Way Bellevue, Washington 98005 Re: Costco 7855 S.W. Dartmouth 609OA-164-000 Deas Joel : This is a Fire and Life safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire departTent, and other local ordinances and regulations. In response to W.B. i,ehner & Associates Fire Protection Engineer letter dated February 28, 1994, item #4 (from fire district's original letter) I am in agreement with the evaluation presented on fire extinguishers. For years I have been mis-rating Table 3-2 .1 of Uniform Fire Code Standard 10-1 (NFPA-10, 1988) . I appreciate Lehner & Associates bringing this to my attention. As it stands, I would agree wl-Ji Mr. Lehner on item #4-N dealing with standpipe and hose systems. It has been our experience that hoses are not necessarily used in the correct manner during fire .fighting operations by building personnel unless trained to do so. As for item #6, please contact Bob Fryer of this office to coordinate the noted flow test to be provided. Regarding .item #I1, response to this item will be forthcoming shortly. "Working"Smoke Detectors Save lives Joel Yamauchi larch 8, 1994 Page 2 If I can he of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 526-2502 . Sincerely, Gene Birchill, DFM Plans Examiner CB:kw cc: W.B. Lehner, P.E. City of Tigard Building Depaz-tmeni. "' Form 2't SUMMARY Project r 1. Project Name CD 5TC O A40LE SA_L15 2. Project Address pq r;-7,,. C f F iC- 9 ---- 3. City/Town T j 4. Building Area(ftz) Attached Chapter Type 1.D. Description Attached Forms and - -- -- - --- —. --- --- Worksheets Building Envelope Form 3a Prescriptive Path 3b Component Performanre Path 1 Check boxes to �J ---- —"--- Indicate the Worksheet 3a Wall U-values attached forms 3b Roof U-values ] and worksheets. 3c Floor U-values 3d Average Thermal Values Systems Form 4a Systems D Worksheet 4a Unitary Air Conditioner--Air Cooled V 4b Unitary Air Conditioner—Water Cooled :1 4c Unitary Heat Pump--Air Cooled :1 4d Unitary Heat Pump--Water Cooled 7 4e Unitary AC&Heat Pump—Evaporatively Cooled :3 4f Packaged Teminal AC—Air Cooled J 4g Packaged Terminal Heat Pump--Air Cooled J 4h Water Chilling Packages—Water&Air Cooled ID 4i Boilers—Gas-Fired and Oil-Fired 4j Furnaces& Unit Heaters—Gas-Fired and Oil-Fired Jpe Artificial Light Form 5a Interior Lighting Y- 5b Lighting Schedule f� f 5c Interior Lighting Power i 5d Exterior Lighting Worksheet 5a Interior Control Credits -_ Applicant 5. Name 8. Telephone 6. Company 9. Date 7. Signature Other No.of Pages — Description of Document Documents - -- ----- - ---- Enter all -----. ------- —-----—— — — — Supporting calcreports and, fest reports and --- --- --- _ _ _ _------- catalog cuts ('/93) Forms 2-1 Form 31) COMPONENT PERFORMANCE PATH ` Heated 1. Above-Grade Walls-Code Maximum Uo from lahle 3S. Enter here and in cell 3(c)and 4(c) Building ---- - - -- ---- 0.30 J 2. Roo`/Ceiling---Code Maximum Uo from lab;e 39. Enter here and in cell 5(c) 0. 09 °Enter the average -- U-values from -- (a) - ------ - (b) (o) - (d/ (e) (f) Worksheet 3d into Building Area or Ccde Max. Actual Target UA Actual UA cells 3(d), 4(d)andComponent _ _Len th U or F _U'or F°` b x c _ (b)x(d) 5(d) 3. Windows and Glazed Doors Q ft' �• 3D -� bFor a slab with Opaque Walls&Doors ft`" the min.lnsulativn 4. Above-Grade C). : o • I J 3 _2M_(0 (05407- level 05407'level Table.15. Roofs and Skylights enter 0.58 into cell __ -��� �• 1 �'�� Z 16 I 7(d). Otherwise, 6. Floors over Unheated Spaces ft' ` 0.013 --- enter 1.34. - f s 7. Unheated Slab on Grade Floor I T� i 0.58_ For an heated J- --i slab with the min. 8. Heated Slab on Grade Floor h 0_90 -- insulation level, ----- - - - --- - - f enter 0.90 into cell 9. Target and Actual UA. Total columns(e)and(f)8(d).Otherwise, 10. Enter"Y"if the Actual UA of cell 9 f is less than Target UA of cell 9(e).Otherw;se, redesign { enter 2.73 -- -_ O _g--- 9 - Cooled 11. Summer Design Temperature from Table 3g,IF 8s Building 12. A . Subtract 75°F from line 11. Enter here and in cell 15(d) - aEnter the -- -- -" average U-value 13. Solar Factor from Table 3g. Enter here and in cell 18(d) of the windows, 14. Above-Grade Walls-Code Maximum OTTV from Table 3 walls,and doors g 31-� from Worksheet 3d. (a) (b) (C) (d) (e) (f) Building Area Actual (b)x(c) x °Enter the Component �sf U value' _ AT TDe ° [(d)or(e)) ave. age from Worksheet a15. Windowsnd Glazed Doors 3d. 16. Above-Grade Opaque Walls& Doors qq Szo 0• 153 •17- IN 09D SC-valfEnter ue of average 17. Total column (J) 1441132.0 SC-value of the � windows from (a) (b) (c) (d) (f) VlrorkshCri.?d. - - Building area - Actual Solar C; - _omponent �sf) � SC-value- Factor b x c x d) 18. Windows and Glaze,Doors 19. Grand Total.Add cells 15(f), 16(f)and 18(f) 20. Actual OTTV. Divide line 19 by cell 17(b) 21. Enter"Y"if the Actual OTTV(line 20) is less than required OT-1'V(line 14).Otherwise, redesign r - r Envelope - ' p 122 The oerimeter insulation for the slab-on-grade floor shall extend downward from Ithe top of the slab for a minimum distance of 24 inches. See Section 5303(d). Il Enter the reference to plans 23. Below-grade walls shall be insula ted with a minimum of R-5 insulation extending and specifications the full height of the wall to the top of the Icwest floor or 10 feet below grade, that shows whichever is less. compliance with the requirements. -- --- - 24. Manufactured doors and windows are certified according to ASTM E 283;or -f -- - 0.37 cfm per foot of window sasn crack and 11 cfm per foot of door crack. 25. On the warm side(winter)of the insulation for the walls. roof and floor,install a 1 ( vapor barrier with a perm rating of one or less.See Section 5303(f). i! (1193) Forms 3-3 Worksheet 3d ' AVERAGE THERMAL VALUE: ( 'Windows - -- — (a� — �bj- (c) (d) (e) (f) �. and Window and Glazed Door Area UA Shading SC A Glazed Description (sf) LI-value (b)x(c) Coefficient (b)x(e) l Doors 1. Total Columns 2. Average U-value. Divide cell 1(d)by cell 1(b).Enter here and on Form 3b,cells 3(d)and 15(c). 3. Average SC-value. Divide cell 1(f)by cell 1(b). Enter here and on Form 3b,cell 18(c) Opaque (a) ------- (b) (c) -- (d) (1) — (g) Walls and Wall and Door Area UA UA TDeq — Doors Description (so U-value (b)x(c) TDeq' (d)x(f) �.._. 'See table q�L 1 4�5� 0. 3 3055 30 !05 below. 00R, Z _ _�n7 I _0 75 300 a _ 110 D(56) Le 4. Vial Columns 5. Average U-value. Divide cell 4(d)by cell 4(b). Enter here and on Form 3b,cells 4(d)and 16(c). 0,13 6 Average TDeq. Divide cell 4(g) by cell 4(d). Enter here and on Form 3b,line 16(d). 31.22 TDEQ ^^ Wall Construction—Mass Per Unit Area -- TDeq (lbs/sf) (°F) 0 to 25 44 26 to 40 37 ----'-- 41 to 70 ----- -� 30 71 and above 23 1i931 Worksheets 3-17 i Worksheet 3d (cont'd) AVERAGE THERMAL VALUES Roofs and --- (a) (b) (c) (d) Skylights Roof and Skylight Area UA _ Description (sf) U-value (b)x(c) 4---- 7. Total Columns 13Were 2 �q Average U-value.Divide 7(d) by 7(b). nd on Form 3b, 8' cell 5(d). Floor over (a)^ (b) —(c) (d) Unheated Floor over Unheated Spare Area UA Space Description (sf) U-value (b)x(c) -NIZA ---- --- 9. Total Columns — — — 10. Average U-value. Divide 9(d)by 9(b). Enter here and on Form 3b,cell 6(d). —� 3-18 Chapter 3- Building Envelope +" + Forin 4 i SYSYEMS system 1. To reduce mechanical cooling during mild and cool weather,each tan system over 3.000 cfm and 90,00 Coni.Ii ol3 Btu/h cooling capacity shall have an air or water economizer system The economizer controls shall be "See Section integrated so that mechanical cooling and economizer cooling can operate at the same time. 5304(a)1 for more X Yes,all of the above is true. information. Otherwise,check one or more boxes to indicate the exception: "See Section 530J(a)4 for more J The outdoor air is of poor quality and requires extensive treatment. information. p Humidification or dehumidification uses more energy then is saved by outdoor air cooling. J Cooling with outdoor air affects the operation of other systems increasing the overall energy consumption of the building. J The building uses heat recovery or some other energy recovery sysic!m. 2. The system controls automatically set back the temperature or shut down equip;oent during unoccupied periods or periods of alternate uses of the space. eyes, all of the above is true. 3. To prevent simultaneous heating and cooling in the same space,temperature and humidity controls shall sequence the supply of zone cooling and heating°. ,/yes,all of the above is true. Otherwise,check one or more boxes to indicate the exception: * In zones with Variable Air Volume(VAV)systems,the zone controls limit the volume of supply air before reheating, recuoling or mixing hot and cold air streams as per Section 5304(a)4. * In zones with special pressurization or cross-contamination concerns,the zone controls automatically reset supply air temperatures to reduce the inefficiency of simultaneous heating and cooling. O At least 7590 of the energy for reheating or for providing warm air in mixing systems is provided from a site-recovered or on-site solar energy source. U Zones require specific humidity levels,such as computer rooms and museums. J Zones have peak supply air flows of 300 cfm or less. Miscella- 4. The ductwork has insulation a:-ording to Table 4a. _ neous Yes, all of the above is true. 5. The piping has insulation according to Table 4c. Yes,all of the above is true. 6. The hot water system prevents flow over 3 gpm for showers and 0.5 gpm for lavatories; and limits outlet temperatures to 110'F for lavaturies. Yes, all of the above is true. Forms 4-1 Worksheet -la UNITARY AIR CONDITIONER-AIR COOLED Proposed (a) --ib) - (o) (dj (e) Equipment Exclude package Proposed terminal air Cooling --- Compliance conditioners and Equip. Model Capacity EER Schedule' room air condition- ID Designation (Btu/h SEER (95 IF db) (A-E) ers. _ e C I -- If the unit is a split system,include the model number I TIM E Yc-C 0 18 1 18,000 0.D0 �• for both the C_( I condensing unit _ T ►{>a_ YCDO�� F I __ �3�40 0.d and coil in the _AC- �0 , model designation _ TKANP-�D 034, G�__ �- Entertheletter - 1�j r C_D CIO DOG% from the table below. 1. Does the proposed equipment meet the required equipment efficiency? Enter"Y"if true. I Y 2. Check boxes to ilndicate the source of information. __ J ARI Unitary Directory, Sec'ion AC(Enter the page number) 7 ARl Applied Products Directory,Section ULE(Enter the page number)- Product data(Attach data furnished by the equipment supplier) Required Eqquippment Cooling Capacity(Btu/h) Minimum Performance EftlCiencq Compliance Equipment But not EER For single phase Schedule -type Cver--- over— SEER (95-F db) units over 65 Mbh — ---- —---- - ---- capacity,use _angle Phase, Schedule C or D. A Singia package 0 65,000 9.7 ---- B Single Phase, 0 65,000 10.0 ---- Split System 0 65,000 ----� 9.5 Three Phase, 65,000 135,000 -•-- 8.9 C w thout a 135,000 760,000 8.5 Heating Section 760,000 -.-- ---- 8.2 -�--- _- - — - 0 65,000 '-- -9.5 Three Phase, 65,000 135,000 8.9 D with a 135,000 760,000 ---- 8.3 Heating Section 760,000 ---- 8.0 Condensing Unit Only 135,000 ,,;q,, Worksheets 4-7 Worksheet Ij FURNACES & UNIT HEATERS--GAS-FIRED AND OIL-FIRED Proposed -�(ej -- Ib)----- — (�) - — — (d) Equipment Proposed E,=Thermal Heating - —i—-- — Compliance Etficiencv Equip, Model Capacity I Et Et Schedule' Detennine the IDDesignation (Btuh) AFUE (Max.) (Min.) (A.E) thermal eNiciem v }A by subtracting Me ——"-- �92 �( measured stack AC-I TRANS 3_ �D �-_— t—� (chimney)loss from 100 percent. /fie-I Z KA E YC C Q �2g LOCO _T 8 Ratings for Ac. ` NE G D O 7 100 O 7 — minimum and — maximum /� AC- �j _ TT�AIJ YC PO�OC )Z��� _ A _ performances arN Q� based or.thezi provided controls. Enter the letter from the table below 1. Does the proposed equipment meet the required equipment efficiency? Enter"Y"if true. Y 2. Check boxes to indicate the source of information. O GAMA Directory(Enter the page number) 4� Product data(Attach data furnished by the equipment supplier) Required — Heating Capacity(Btu/h)- - Minimum Performance Equipment Efficiency But not Et Et Compliance Equipment Schedule Type Over— over-- AFUE (Max.) (Min.) Gas-Fired, Warm Air — 0 225.000 78',0 ---- --- A Furnaces and Combination 225,000 ---- ---- 80% 76% Furnace/Air Conditioner �— Oil-Fired,Warm Air 0 225,000 78% ---- B Furnaces and Combination 225,000 8140 81°0 Furnace/Air Conditioner C Gas-Fired, 0 -_-_ ____ 78% 75% Duct Furnaces r) Gas-Fired, 0 ____ ___ 7840 7440 Unit Heaters -F Oil-Fired, 0 ---- - 81°0 81% Unit Heaters Jy 4-16 Chapter System "' COOLING LOAD DATA N NW NE CALC.BY: Linda Burman DATE. 3/4/94 - -� PROJECT: Costco WHOLESALE lk I LOCATION: Tigard,Oregon LATITUDE: 456 TWE: 1500 WALL GROUPS: D,E,C ROOF NUMBER: 5 W E TEMPERATURE INDOORS(Ti): 78 --- �� TEMPERATURE OUTDOORS(To): 85 ` _ o DAILY RANGE(Dr). 23 AVERAGE TEMPERATURE OUTDOOR=ATo ATo=To-Dr/2= 73 5 AREAS i $W �� i1mt� .._ SE MAIN BUILDING 130,224 SO FT $ TIRE SALES 3168 SO FT BUILDINC OUTLINE TIRE INSTALL 2016 SO F TOTAL 135,408 SO FT CONDUCTION -Ti)CF=(78 +(ATo-85)= WALLS TABLE 7 TABLE 9 ORIENT. CLTD CLTD CF CLTDC OUTSIDE AIR MIN.CFM/OCCUPANT: 15 NORTH"D" 12 0 -11.5 0.5 #OCCUPANTS: 800 EAST"D" 33 1 -11.5 22.5 TOTAL OUTSIDE AIR. 12000 SOUTH"D" 20 4 -11.5 12.5 WEST"D" 14 1 -11.5 3.5 OCCUPANT HEAT GAIN NORTH,"E" 15 0 -11.5 3.5 TABLE 18& 19,CHAP 2F EAST,"E" 36 1 -11.5 25.5 SOUTH,"E" 29 4 -11.5 21.5 SENSIBLE: 315 WEST,"E" 20 1 -11.5 9.5 LATENT: 325 N.DOCR,"G" 24 0 -11.5 12.5 ICLG.LOAD FACTOR: 1 E.DOOR,"G" 30 1 -11.5 19.5 S.DOOR,"G" 43 4 -11.5 35.5 WINDOW W.DOOR,"G" 56 1 -11.5 45.5 CHAP.27,TABLE 13 N.E."D" 23 0 -11.5 11.5 N.E."E" 26 0 -11.5 14.5 Uskv= 0.7 N.E."G" 27 0 -11.5 15.5 Usmokevent= 1.2 ROOF TABLE 5 TABLE 9 CLTD CLTD CF CLTD 63 1 -11.5 52.5 SKYLIGHT TABLE 10 CLTD CF CLTD GLASS SHADINC COEFFICIENTS 14 0 -11.5 2.5 CHAP.27,TABLE 29&42 SOLAR SMUKEVENT SC: 0.85 ORIENT TABLE 11 TABLE 13 SKYLIGHT SC: 0.66 GLASS SHG CLF HORIZ 262 0.62 LIGHTING&EQUIPMENT GAIN TABLE 15,16,17,24 ^ LIGHTING 1 6 WATTS/SF EQUIP 0.5 WATTS/SF F`sigr1 4 � SPACE: MAIN SALES AREA I CALC.BY: Linda Burman OUTSIDE DBT: 85 WBT: 67 PROJECT: Costco INSIDE DBT: 78 WBT: 67 LOCATION: Tigard, Oregon DATE: 3/4/94 TEMP. DIFF. 7 TIME: 1500 TRANSMISSION ORIENT. SOURCE AREA CLTDC U BTU TOTAL NORT H WALT_ 1 1475 3.5 0.31 1600 WALL 2 744 0.5 0.1 37 WALL 3 5040 12.5 0.11 6930 DOOR 1 2.1 12.5 0.42 10 ,OOR 2 0 12.5 0.07 0 SOUTH '_L 1 1102 21.5 0.31 7345 WALL 2. 1256 12.5 0.1 1570 WALL 3 5760 35.5 0.11 22493 DOOR 1 21 35.5 0.42 313 DOOR 2 181 35.5 0.07 450 EAST WALL 1 2304 25.5 0.31 18213 WALL 2 352 22.5 0.1 792 WALL 3 7744 19.5 0.11 16611 DOOR 1 202 19.5 0.42 1654 DOOR 2 2tO 19.5 0.07 369 WEST WALL 1 2943 9.5 0.31 8667 WALL 2 272 3.5 0.1 95 WALL 3 7818 45.5 0.11 39129 DOOR 1 259 45.5 0.42 4949 DOOR 2 0 45.5 0.07 0 N.E. WALL 1 815 14.5 0.31 3663 WALL 3 22.0 15.5 0.11 375.1 DOOR 2 200 15.5 0.07 217 HORIZ. ROOF 123,713 52.5 0.051 331241 SKYLIGHT 4120 2.5 0.7 7209 SMOKEVENT 2066 2.5 1.2 _ C-198 TOTAL TRANSMISSION 480232 SOLAR RADIATION ORIENT, SOURCE AREA SC SHG CLF BTLi TOTAL HORIZ SKYLIGHT 4120 0.66 262 0.63 441668 SMOKE'/riJT 2066 + 0.85 262 0.62 265261 _ TOTAL RADIATION _ 726929 INTERNAL LOADS !� PEOPLE NUMBER 800 315 CLF 252000 LIGHTS WATTS 2.08358 3.41 CLF 710502 EQUIPMENT WATTS 65112 3.41 EFF 222032 OUTSIDE AIR CFM 12000 1.08 TEMP DIFF 7 90720_ TOTAL _ 1275254 LATENT LOADS I PEOPLE NUMBER 800 325 CLF 260000 TOTAL _ 260000 TOTAL COOLING LOAD: 2742415 NUMBER OF TONS: 229 t NUMBER OF 25 TON UNITS -� _ - of ' I Page 2 SPACE: OFFICE AREA CALC.BY: Linda Burman OUTSIDE DBT: 85 WBT: 67 PROJECT:COSTCO INSIDE DBT. 78 WBT: 67 LOCATION: Tigard,Oregon DATE. 3/4/94 TEMP, DIFF. 7 TIME: 1500 TRANSMISSION ORIENT. SOURCE AREA CLTDC U BTU TOTAL NORTH WALL 2 260 0.5 0.1 13 FIOR17_. ROOF 0 52.5 0.051 0 TOTAL TRANSMISSION i 13 INTERNAL LOADS PEOPLE NUMBER 15 315 CLF 4725 I JGHTS WATTS 1600 3.41 CLF 5456 1 GUIPMENT WATTS 800 3.41 EFF 2728 OUTSIDE AIR CFM 150 1.08 TEMP DIFF __ 7 1134 TOTAL 14043 LATENT LOADS PEOPLE NUMBER 15 325 CLF 4875 OUTSIDE AIR CFM 150 18 GR/LB 0.68 1836 TOTAL 6711 [TOTAL COOLING LOAD: — 20767 NUMBER OF TONS: 2 Page 3 SPACE: TIRE SALES CALC.BY- Linda Burman OUTSIDE DBT: 85 WBT: 67 PROJECT. COSTCO INSIDE DBT: 78 WBT: B7 LOCAfiON: Tigard, Oregon DATE: 314194 TEMP. DIFF. 7 TIME: 1500 TRANSMISSION ORIENT. SOURCE AREA CLTDC U BTU TOTAL EAST WALL 1 246 25.5 0.31 1944,63 WALL 3 360 19 .5 0.11 772.2 DOOR 3 42 2.5 1.13 118.65 NORTH WALL 1 675 3.5 0.31 732.375 WALL 3 888 12.5 0.11 1221 DOOR 1 21 12.5 0.42 110.25 HORIZ. SKYLIGHT 150 2.5 0.7 262.5 IROOF 3018 52.5 0.051 8080.695 TOTAL TRANSMISSION r4 1J242.3 SOLAR RADIATION �~ ORIENT. 40URCE AREA SC SHG CLF BTU TOTAL HORIZ SKYLIGHT 180 0.66 262 0.62 19297.872 TOTAL 19297.872 INTERNAL LOADS PEOPLE NUMBER 25 315 CLF 7875 r LIGHTS WATTS 5400 3.41 CLF 18414 EQUIPMENT WATTS 1500 3.d1 EFF 5115 INFILTRATION CFM 375 1.08 TEMP DIFF 7 2935 TOTAL 34239 LATENT LOADS PEOPLE NUMBER 25 325 CLF 8125 OUTSIDE AIR _CFM 375 18 GR/LB 0.68 4590 TC`TAL 12715 [TO�X' CGLING LOAD. 79494.172 NO UMBER OF TONS: 6.62 Page 4 } SPACE: PHARMACY CALC.BY: Linda Burman OUTSIDE DBT: b5 WBT: 67 PROJECT COSTCO INSIDE DBT: 7r WBT: 67 LOCATION: Tigard, Oregon DATE: 3/4/94 TEMP. DIFF. 7 TIME. 1500 TRANSMISSION ORIENT. SOURCE AREA CLTDC U BTU TOTAL VVEST WALL 2 480 3.5 0.1 168 HORIZ ROOF 0 TCTAI.i RANSMISSION 168 INTERNAL LOADS PEOPLE NUMBER 10 315 CLF 3150 LIGHTS WATTS 1248 3.41 CLF 4255.68 EQUIPMENT WATTS 468 3 41 EFF 1595.88 OUTSIDE AIR CFM 150 1.08 TEMP DIFF 7 1134 TOTAL 10135.56 LATENT LOADS PEOPLE NUMBER 10 325 CLF 3250 OUTSIDE AIR CFM 150 18 GR/LB 0.68 1836 TOTAL 5086 TOTAL COOLING LOAD: 15389.56 NUMBER OF TONS- _ 1.28 j f Page 5 SPACE: EDP CALC.BY: Linda 9urman OUTSIDE DBT: PROJECT: C;OSTCCG85 WBT: 67 LOCATION INSIDE DBT: Tigard, Oregon 78 WBT: 67 DATE: 3/4/94 TEMP DIFF. 7 TIME: 1500 TRANSMISSION ORIENT. SOURCE JTOTAI AREA CLTDC U BTUNORTH WALL' 1000.5 p.1 5 HORIZ. ROOF0 52.5 0.051 0 7JTAL TRA�'SMISSION ------------ !NTERrNAL LOADS — PEOP`E NUMBER LIGHTS 2 315 CLF EQUIPMENT WATTS 300 3.41 CLF 630 OUTSIDE AIR BTU 32000 1023 CFM 1 EFF 32000 TOTAL — 3_0�_1 08 TEMP DIFF 7 226.8 --------------- -- 33879.8 LATENT LOA —' PEOPLE NUMBER OUTSIDE AIR 2 325 CLF TOTAL CFM 30 18 GR/LB 650 0.68 367.2 TOTAL COOLIN LG OAO ""— -- i21_7 2 NUMBER OF TONS: 34802 !I I Page 6 COMPUTATION BEAT LOSS PROJECT NAME: CUSTCO\\NHOLESALE INSIDE TEMP: 70 LOCATION: TIGARD, OREGON OUTSIDE TEMP. 23 JOB NUMBER 133-0394 FLOOR AREA: 135408 TEMP. DIFF. 47 DATE: March 3, 1994 COMP BY: LINDA BURMAN PACE ------- ?> URGE A EA FMP DIFF HFA T LOSS MAIN SALES ROOF 123713 0.051 47 2.96,540 WALL 1 8639 0.31 47 125,870 WALL 2 2624 0.1 47 12,333 WALL 3 31186 0.11 47 161,232 DOOR 1 503 0.42 47 9,929 DOOR 2 651 0.07 47 2,142 SMOKEVENT 2175 1.2 4/ 122,670 SKYLIGHT 4336 0.7 47 142,654 HO A_ BHOUTSIDE AIR 12000 1.08 47 609,120 150°° 2223735 l.Ol4HEAT UNIT 203000 X #units 3 609000 HIGH HEAT UNIT 324000 X #units 6 1944000 TOTAL PROVIDED must be equal to or les: than 150% 1944000 SPACE O i,E !.R: TEt P DIFF RFATLOSS OFFICE AREA ROOF 0 0.051 47 �- 0 WALL 2 260 0.1 47 1222 SKYLIGHT 0 0.7 47 0 OUTSIDE AIR 150 1.08 47 7614 OT7 MBH 8836 SPACE = -= TEMP DIFF REATLOSS TIRE ROOF 3018 0.051 47 72.34.146 SALES WALL 1 921 0.31 47 13418.97 WAIL 3 1248 0.11 47 F452.16 DOOR 1 21 0.42 47 4'4.54 DOOR 3 42 0.42 47 829.6; SKYLIGHT 150 0.7 47 4935 OUTSIDE AIR 450 1.08 47 22842 TOTA H 56 Z SPACE �,,C � - TE'nM€ DIFF f =AI LOSS PHARMACY ROOF 0 0.051 47 0 WALL 2 480 0.'I 47 2256 0 IDOOR1 0 0.42 47 0 DOOR 2 C 0.07 47 0 SKYLIGHT 0 07 47 n OUTSIDE AIR 150 1.08 47 7614 TUI B 9870 SP77 SOURCE AREA moTEVP DIFF HEqT LOSS TIRE INSTALL ROOF 0.051 47 4544.712 WALL 1 295 0.31 47 4298.15 WALL 3 920 0 IDOORI 21 0.42 47 414.54 DOOR 2 420 0.07 47 1381.8 SKYL IGHT 120 0.7 41 3948 In OUTSIDE AIR 1600 108 47 81216 COSTCO WHOLESALE NEW BUILDING ELEMENT STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF SKETCH OF ELEMENT: 2 \ -\ LAYERS: R SOLID R CAVITY 1. OUTSIDE AIR FILM 0.17 2. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF 0 3. R-19 BATT INSUL 19 4. METAL PURLIN 0 5. INSIDE AIR FILM 0.61 R-TOTAL 19.78 U-VALUE 0.051 FRAMING RATIO: SOLID RATIO +. CAVITY RATIO = R SOLID R CAVITY R-TOTAL 19.78 U-TOTAL 0.051 • i COSTCO WHOLESALE NEW BUILDING ELEMENT CMU WALL W/UNGROUTED CELLS FILLED WALL 1 SKETCH OF ELEMENT: LAYERS: R SOLID R CAVITY %OF TOTAL 1. OUTSIDE AIR FILM 0.17 0.17 2. 8"CMU SOLID GROUT CORES (33%) 1.56 0 33 3. 8"CMU,VERMICULITE-FILL INSUL.(67%) 0 3.1 67 4. INSIDE AIR FILM 0.68 0.68 R-TOTAL 2.41 3.95 U-VALUE 0.415 0.253 FRAMING RATIO: SOLID RATIO + CAVITY RATIO = R SOLID R CAVITY U-TOTAL. 0.307 R-TOTAL 3.262. COSTCO WHOLESALE NEW BUILDING ELEMENT CMU WALL W/FURRING & INSUL. WALL 2 SKETCH OF ELEMENT: _--te�a LAYERS. R SOLID R CAVITY % OF OTAL 1. OUTSIDE AIR FILM 0.17 0.17 2. 8" CMU, SOLID GROUT CORES (33%) 1.56 0 33 — 3""MU, VERMICULITE-FILL INSUL (67%) 0 3.1 67 4. 2X4 FURRING W/ R-11 BATT(EFF VALUE) 6.5 6.5 5. 5/8 GWB 0.56 0.56 6. INSIDE AIR FILM 0.68 0.68 R-TOI AL: 9.47 11.01 U-VALUE 0.106 0.091 FRAMING RATIO: SOLID RATIO + CAS/FfY RATIO R SOLID R CAVITY U-TOTAL 0.096 R- TOTAL. 10.449 COSTCO WHOLESALE NEW BUILDING ELEMENT CMU WALL W/FURRING& INSUL.. WALL 3 SKETCH OF ELEMENT: '1 3 ,I �- 4 LAYERS. R SOLID R CAVITY % OF TOTAL. 1. OUTSIDE AIR FILM 0 17 2. METAL WALL PANEL 0 3. R-13 BATT INSUL. 7 A 4. HORIZONTAL GIRTHS 0 6, INSIDE AIR FILM 0.68 R-TOTAL: 8.79 U-VALUE 0.11 VRAMING RATIO: SOLID RATIO + CAVITY RATIO= R SOLID R CAVITY U-TOTAL 0.11 R-TOTAL 879 TUALATIN VALLEV FIRE & RESCUE AND BEAVERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT • 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive • P.O. Box 4755 • Beaverton, OR 97076 • (503) 52..6-2469• FAX 526-2538 February 21, 1994 Joel Yamauchi Mulvanny Partnership 12200 Northrup Way Bellevue, Washington 98005 Re: Costco Wholesale 7855 S.W. Dartmouth Road 609OA-164-000 Dear Mr. Yamauchi : A review of memo forwarded to you by W.B. Lehner, P.E. dated February 4, 1994, addressing comments of Fire District 's letter dated January 13, 1994, generates the following comments. Note, item numbers will correspond to January 13, 1994 Fire District letter. 1 . Material. Safety Data Sheets (MSUS) : Item abated. Inventories by product and summary of totals adequately fill the needs of this department for requests of MSDS and quantities. This presentation is an extremely comprehensive form. Thank you and W.B . Lehner & Associates for the work expended. 2 . High Piled Stock Access to Buildings: Item abated. Upon re-evaluation of the storage rack system layout_, the fire district agrees that proposed access locations are best ,placed along the north and south sides of the structure as originally designed. 3 . Address: Item abated. Please note: This is partially included for the use of inspectors conducting joint final inspections with building department. 4 . Fire Extinguisher Requirements_ By this P.Ians Examiner's calculations, not .less than 104 units of Class 2A hand held fire extinguishers small be installed in this structure. Inventory shown on "Worklnx"Smoke Detevors Save Lives Joel. Yamaur-hi February 21, 1994 Page 2 drawing lA supplement indicates the following: Twenty 4A units equal to forty 2A units plus a thirteen hose station equals thirteen 2A units for a total of fifth three 2.A units; plus a symbol with a star of unknown unit size and hose ranks assumed to be Class 11 or. 111' hose system for an additional five 2A units for a grand total of fifty eight 2A units. A careful study of Uniform Fire Code (UFC) Standard 10--1 (NFPA 10) Section 3-2 .2 and UFC Amendment leaves one wondering what the equivalent trade off might be for handlines versus fire extinguishers. This Plans Examiner believes, however, that the wording leads one to the interpretation that 1 hose station is equal :.'o a unit of 2A handheld fire extinguisher power. Additionally, UFC Amendment leads one to believe that only hose lines supplied by Class IT or III standpipe can be granted credit for such exchange with handheld extinguishers. All in all, this Plans .Examiner does not believe that adequate hand held extinguishers and equivalent in hose lines are being provided in this structure . This Plans Examiner is interested in hearing other interpretations and adaption of UFC Standard 10--1 This Fire Department discourages the use of hand held lines in lieu of hand extinguishers for the following reasons: a . Maintenance problems. b. Employees fighting fires with hose lines have a tendency to take more fire on than they can handle, thus getting themselves into problem- that they cannot get out of. C. These emplovees, when In trouble, have a tendency to drop hoses and run leaving the hoses delivering water, thus .robbing automatic sprinkler systems and fire fighters from that .*rate -. If Costco wants to use hardlines as substitution for hand held fire extinguishers, they shall : a . Be of Class IT or III standpipe and hose systEms as specified in amended section 3- 2 .2 of UFC Standard 1.0-1 . s Joel Yamauchi February 21, 1994 Page .3 b. Have main control valves for standpip:� and automatic sprinkler systems of wall post indicating valves or OS&Y valves that are placed in a room separately from the rest of the building by not less than 1 hour occupancy separation with direct outside access . C. All employees shall receive training and re- training in the use of standpipe and hose systems in accordance with OSHA standards. Such training and re-training shall be documented and documents made available for the Fire District upon request. .5. Automatic Sprinkler Plan: Item abated. 6 . Fire Flow_ on-site flow tests will be required for documentation upon completion of fire main facilities and prior to occupancy and operation. 7. Knox Box: Item abated. B . Curtain Boards: Documentation supplied adequately & rovers Fire District's concerns. The Fire District 9. would recommend .installing curtain boards as if the entire building were used for high piled stock for flexibility of the use of the building in the future. 10 . Smoke Vent Spacing: Item abated. 11 . Smoke Vent Specifications: Documentation submitted to the Fire District was not totally legible because of being faxed and the number of times copied. The Fire District does understand that remote electric operation is being provided for those smoke vents that are required to be openable. UFC Article 81 Location of the control panel is acceptable with the Fire District. The design of the control panel remains to be approved by the Fire District. The Fire. District would recommend that automatic fusible link operation of smoke/heat hatches be one temperature rating higher than automatic sprinkler head temperature rating. The Fire District was unclear as to time/temperature gradient for 5 minutes of the smoke hatches. As for zoning of the vents from the Joel Yamauchi February 21, 1994 Page 4 control panel, the District would prefer to see 50% of the vents open in each draft curtain in the area per zone. Where there are odd numbers (i .e., 3) within a draft curtained area, two adjacent smoke vents should be openable and the third would be openable separately. 17. . Fire Fightinc—Water Supply and Accjss Roadway.' Item abated. 13 . No Parking Signs_ Item abated. i 14 . Fire, Hvdrant Locations: Item abated. See copy of attached letter to Rick Martin of W.H. Pacific. 15. Additional Water Supply__ Reccmmendations�_ Item abated. May be re-visited with verification as noted in item 6 above. 16. PrFssuri.zed Hydrants:_ With the redesign of ' underground, hydrant: and automatic sprinkler fire department connection locations by W.H. Pacific, this item has been abated. 17. Supervis ion of Water Su pp1 y Valves: Item abated. 18. Testincr of Cnde ground: Item abated. 19. Contractor's Material and Test Certificate_ Item abated. Please 1.'ote: Items 17, 18, and 19 were included on original letter simply to help both the resign people and fire district personnel conducting final inspections with building department to ensure that these various requirrnments are carried through. If I can be of any further assistance to you, plaase feel free to contact me at 526-2502 . Sincerely, I / Gene Birchill, DFM Plans Examiner GB:kw cc: City of Tigard Building Department CITY OF TIGARD Feoruary 3 , 1994 OREGON 2 Joel Yamauchi Mulvanny Partnership Architects 12200 Northrup Way Bellevue, WA 98005 Pr(�ject : Costco-- Plan Check #12-50C 785 SW Dartmouth Street: Subject : Modification to Table 5-E (1991 UBC with Oregon Amendments) Since the occupant load for this building is 4300 (Section 3302 (a) and Table 33-A) , Table 5-E requires 5 drinking fountains. However, in response to your concerns with the application of this code requiremeiit, the C,cy of Tigard will grant a modification (Section 106) of the applicable code Sections stated, subject to the following conditions: 1 . ThG 4astallation of not less than one fountain, shall be accessible complying with Section 3109 (h) , and at least one fountain shall be mounted at a standard height (Section 3108 (d) l and figure 27) . 2 . Make the appropriate changes to the plans with additional deta;.ls for compliance with item #1 . Please make these corrections on the appropriate pages of the drawings and resubmit 3 copies of each page to the City of 'Tigard for review. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call . Sincerely,, p44' A'r`f'w, Mark Burrows Plans Examiner FAX (503) 684-7.:97 mhimn1111..-1.,. 13125 SV'1 Hall Blvd., Tigaid, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (5e3) h84-2772 ----- ----- ---- - --- MULVF,fnny PfIRTAERSHIP A R C H I T E C T S R S. January 24, 1994 Mark Burrows City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Costco Wholesale - Plan Review Comments Tigard, Oregon MPk: 93-045.01 1. The wall legend does indicate that these walls are to be one hour walls - I will add 5/8" GWB, Type 'X' to legend note. 2. Although the calculations show occupant load to be +4000, this does not in reality happen ... there might be 600 pernle maximum at any one time and therefore the need for more than one drinking fountain ( 1 per 1000) is not necessary. 3. Restrooms are completely tiled. 4. See attached forms - a copy was submitted with drawings. 5. See attached comments from W.B. Lehner & Associates for Items 5,6 and 7. 6. See W.B. Lehner comment. 7. The room named LAB at optometry is simply a workroom - usage of the term LAB is inappropriate. We will retitle room as "Workroom". A curb ramp de''=1 ,'t"ill be provided. However, need City Standard Guides for such detail. Please send. 9. We have provided 16 stalls for handicap and 2 are for vans (1/8) - the accessible aisles are a minimum of 8' or 96" - signage will be ;ger City of Tigard Standards. 10. Aisle spacing for other handicap stalls are shown 5'-0"; however, the stall spacing itself is 10'. Therefore we have .dually provided an ex!ra 2-0"', making the aisle 7'- 0". This arrangement shown on the drawings more than meets the code and should he acceptable as shown. 11. This is :,hown on Sheet A-7. Douglas I. Mulvanny ■ Jerry ®u'nn lee ■ Mitchell C. Smith 12200 Northup Way, Bellevue, WA 98005 ■ (206)881 -7600 ■ FAX: (206)869-2563 Mark Burrows City of Tigard January 24, 1994 Page 2 12. We Neill comply at Door #29 and between Doors 1 and 2. It will be added to drawings and specifications. 13. We will comply per the attached sketch - exiting through exterior wall is not acceptable to client for security of their products reason - beside aesthetically !his would not be very satisfactory for anyone. 14. Detail on civil drawirgs will be modified accordingly. 15. Spec;fications have been submitted. 16. See Sheet SD-2. 17. Fills to be compacted to 95% of ASTM D1557 minimum. See Soils Report or Specification, Section 2C. Soils Report was submitted. 18. See attached Detail 3/M-5. S I JDE W. 1. See Specifications, Section 2 A - 2A.03.g. 2. Detail reference should be 10/C04 - Specification Section 2 refers to rockery walls. 3. soils Report was submitted - rockery wall will have a perforated pipe drain at footing. 4. Per contractor F = 142,000 bey, c _ 98,375 bey. 5. landscape plan shows groundcover on all slopes. 6. Owner is aware of professional inspection of grading. We will comply and have service of testing agency. T Ok, will comply. 8. Idertify which piges need to be signed (title sheet?). 9. Will comply. Mark Burtows City of Tigard January 24, 1994 Page 3 STRUCTURAL 1 - S See attar commends from Engineers Northwest. Thank you, and if you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, MULVANNY PARTNERSIiIP P.s. Joel Ya uchi JY/mk cc: Ali Moayeri, Price/Costco, Inc. 01/21/1994 15:26 2067454739 W.B. LLHJEN A ASSOC. PAGE 03 W B LEHNER & ASSOCIATES FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERS 524-132nd. St. SW Ste. 8105 Everett, WA 98204 1-800-698-0569 (206) 743-7452 FAX: 745-4739 January 21, 1994 TO: Joel Yamauchl The Mulvanny Partnership 12200 Northrup Way Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: COSTCO WHOLESALE Tigard, OR Dear Joel: This letter Is a response to the city's plan check comr-ents, numbared per their lift. 5. a. No flammable or combustible liquids are used within the building. b. Storage of thesq liquids are in pallet piles or racks. 1. Pallet piles and racks are protected by we4. spr!nklArs at .495 /2000 sq. ft. which equates to .33/3000 sq. ft. Only .30/3000 sq, ft. is required. 2. Piling and rack heights are limited to 12 feet for class III A. & R liquids, the predominant commodity. (1993 UFC Table 79.2.04-A). c. Maximum, quantities of flammable and combustible liquids is 970 gallons, while the allowable maximum is 3000 gal. per 1991 UFC; table 79.2.02-A, notes 6 & U. d. No class I-A flammable liquids are storod, e. A hazardous materials inventary is attached. 6, Glow or flame producing appliances are not InstallAd within 18" of the floor in the warehouse. The commodities stored will not rel-3ase vapors unless damaged in An accident. Such a release is small and rapidly disperses in this large building, posing no ignition hazard. No hazardous equipment locations exist within the warehouse (Ref. N.E.C. 500-5) 7. This building does not contain laboratories or vocationa shops. A list of hazardous materiels Is Included. Please note that all quantities aria within the allowable limits for a B-2 occupancy. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, W. B. Lehner, P.E. WBl1Mbl Fire. Protection Fnginnnr 93327-L.2 W 13 LLHNER & ,ASSOCIATES 4 OD 00 0 n . A �D .n N W .� A 41 � f n n � � n • n r _ cu ftj r�1 r-1 ul Car O m ►n to V) U) to � r� � � I vj- -4 CV) CC) 0 ,7- z ¢ •- ca 'd n o 0 CL A )„ C%j 00 co P. Q m >- 0 -1. 0 NSI fx7 Z0 3t-Vd 'OOSSV 'S d3M3-1 'H'M 6EL09PL90Z. 9Z:9Z h66i/,TZ i0 r4q ZOOd WdE4�40 48-IZ-fO BEL4y4L90Z I alr-, --) Y 0i ' C .� w c Cf) ° 0 � � F 400 r V a0 a0 t0 41 a W z N q p G7 Q O Pl 4 Lh LA L1 N r 2rn rnamiaciv ago cod co lir �j ODr• r- r OD CD m oo a� ao t� a - 48 of.12 M� cr) J J s � 4 ctt T r N w a � N o N r- N p9T � m :2 a � o Ur� z I o i is ui op, f: x tli II p m ,v t 1_f,L-Qr. �S,_ ► T,k Sx_S? 60 39Hd oossv 18 d3m*g-1 '0'M 6ELOSOL90Z 9Z.:6i b66T/,TZ/10 ' E-611 �Oflj V7d�.D � 6� Vh-17—I11 iif_LY'itl,'10? r- W C I Q A C) L In . CU an m 1s it 11 it 11 11 11 it H if it it 11pp " " cc U- " c'r U- C! CC tip ir u. o ff. Tj T3 15 Z t,►►� � t�- " r te 0 � 4 � 'i [L W Q OC LL It Ir to a) O Q. n N N 0) r0 b (7 NN V ° n; Qb ql tv N co rro iz ►► (L Q ►► CcM ►► L - oro n R: n q) ;5 ►► IL w > EC �S- 2 UO Im cp z ivi Tom [ N r w (U Du pu d � � ca (j c7 (j� Oj `a �. r- r- crp I rr r •• — r. r- 0 r C.> 0 ! Ur •^- (7 o '� ►. to .- x u it cr rr. z w to co �( H I �n ! � vv ca a cT crit .g' �f .Q L6 24 0 O W Z II rn `` � cc kro ' ► A c C3 a t7 o E E E E _ i °� e eE ccm 17 to- = m ►► ` P � a a a rid >1° to n u lU w ni m Il! ,u 96 I z �' zU) 0 Ag ` > ocg 0 � =' 0 � Q �3 0 4 dQ � � U >- cu �7= U f _� Q w � � E 0�) oCO raccol z O r) 0 — � mQa .� � � u� T UQ (D0 UO 1 0 m p U n b0 39Wd 'OOSSV 'S 83JU-1 'Q'M 6EtbShl.991 9Z*Sl 066T/T7'/TO E411• 400d WdE4�40 68--IZ-IO GEc.696L9f1' a Q. co z U.. tl. � tx. L'_ IL lt. LL Tr c r _ W CD (II 4] f� al ID In77 ;mz Da Q] ►ti U �3 t7 a II if u II' a II 1I o n u o II a �� p �i( o II `ii o �I q N •I� ►I IN I►I II II I► '� rn U: �; ►Z I,- Tia I� If (r L� If Er LL- If U. II 2 IL II LL. 11cr II n LL II LL 11 ... LL II ro 16 CE c\l w n, cv � ju C'A m � cv I i C'l � � r) `� w V) m 41 0 m n� r,7 (a w c') (a ai 0 C13 Cl) It c� � � o, a ro u �+ n a u ro n `D b u °� b II 01 m u �' ro u �' .o a "' .ro a �' m n �' m v ` s � ^ z is = ¢ = ate = � = 2 � � 3z `� z ¢ 3 = � 3 = Q o, 91 l ;; a t z 4 �n W Ih W N-n) IL1 N N _N W IV m !u m --0-- Ca C) �' u GU « C) 0U 00 oU o 0 0 oUl (Il � ¢ � � 0 .., � Q _.. W) vp (A Om Cj to V 'J J r (7 T- (�— v-(�J r (7 IA J N J N J (7 +- ti a , 0 to `�' .a C7 i7 to 0. m a -) �p 1 � � a� � � � � •� � -p � •a � v � v ,G r T - -- --- - -- Q -- - - -- 11 lu cu ILL. II cr r1 Q N p x C] t C0 4)- Q C 4 RO Ol (u T Y fs d L 'gyp to $ O. C Q Cl 11 O tic a ] �i. � 13 U LCLCD 7 � X V a: U. WLAJ 7— c� �` •0 o FO z7- o z � ° � w ~ � a �tu � n E � :03, � n� Ur 0 7 Q a' a Q9 IL 11 a 90 39Vcl 'OOSSV B d3"431 9'M 6ELD9bL906 9Z:51 t'661/1Z/l0 C9# SOOd Wdf'U' b0 b5 - IZ ((1 bEL65bL90Z CL ui CD oC or cr_ 2 ItccaC T 4 S 4 O p OC iC ff OC Q�Q Com, Z z X z U Q CL O u O u '' ? 8 ir u: (c Q n 0 -- n; a 0) 4u.' I�glL' ` oc " aco I1 � � II I �a ? _ _ ¢I vN mN rtt `mc*� �`oU �`yc*� uI 0. w f 0 II II jr II � �n q � I F = sQ o Ez a II r a 0 loc.) 0 f) 0 u 01 p aim � U rn WWI E o V *' + N N a II II I7 x � = S Wl (� Oy N N rid rU cCL MQ ILIPU-- - — — t> Y a a 'a r -j IT II ISL T - — Q c � I _ d w •ia Ea �s+ T II x C�n3 * U v 3 I W Cr -o - -� --- — - --- LLJ -w LL 43 F6 Ir W U '' U� it E N Z _ -- LL __ ----I---U- -- -- ---–�- — - -- _ _ ____ 90 39Vd 'OQSSV B 83h4431 '9•M 6f.Lb9bL90Z 9Z:C;l b66i/Ti7 0 C3 so or. off ' 11, II a: u. II Ix LL a: LA- a: U. IIfrLL cc LL 11a: LL ccLLIIir � II ¢ ►L II cc u. 11 ¢ 35 Tim Tim u �i c t'i : a jy N Oi N m o c� Oj N co m v N ca _m C4 a pi N a� N ro a .- 41 u ro a) a ro !y E k a N m n ca n °� m u ro u ro u �a a ir- m n 0 ro a °' .o n a iv li w ro a � 2 II c � cr . z In � • rod � !u , m� m to 0 0 m w mw w9! com ro � —u D ca 0 � C) 0Un c2 co N M M EU)U) N N .- N N �- . ] II a II Q Q 2 2 N NU1 N N N N N0 Nu) N (� o oz OT o OT o o oz oz o o o w~ u, <e co Q rb Rt' u1 'Q w `t w N a `; cv Q b d N rQ♦ r U T U T V T U r U r 0 r V C) f^ U L� .rr- u r' V __ ..�is 1q •Q -� -O � � ,� T7 .- -�� � ;O � .TZ � v � :R C � a � � r. t` n 00 p n m r- w �cr ¢ ca W t t m �S g C!ca rC 3 fa a1 c,� Kr n LO a. rn q 4 Q Ci cFL am m ?. n a1 E? k E Q ° 015 II U a a cn m ul v U v r LL OxLU mIm_ .r IO � 2 0 � a U a m z nc otl LL Z z 0 UJ E a C7 PPU�_ h X cc !d T O O c s> U c11 Lu4 ca W ' 4 Q 2 -iJLL CL L0 39Vd OOSSV B 83N-13-1 '8'M 6EtV9VL90Z 9Z:9: 066i/IZ/10 r Ev# LDOd Wdf6:90 46-I0-I0 6EL99DL90Z r,.'R — p�� qqppLn U w I aa ¢ z Ircc ar q u_ Q u ct U. u_ u_ u. u u 0. n_ a_ CC 0. rL rL a m a. a s 'o w 0 � <V ((�7 � N NCV (�N (�N N N () A w ! U! UJ li W W UJ !11 Q 4 a o do d a a ..rte.. 3 II OI LL. II I� V, II ix ly II LL II Ll II tj 13i 7s 0 am 0. B JV n a 10. tv IIQM aD: m o x z x x = 3 _ z is c a a o a o w 13 p r r r r r ;\I CNI pQp JC q� k c a a n u Z N m0 N rL II cc EQ c E it S.I Q U .eco SW c � z ZCIL z ati an U n n 80 3E)Vd '00SSV W d3f+13-1 GEZVGPL90Z 9Z SI b65I/Il/i0 F:V" T T rocv cj U- Lt- kjL- CC C4 (N CIJ C\l 0' 0 a C) 0 C) OC (T- Cr_' W- rr, < -f lu LU w 1.11C3 0 0 LLU 00 _ 01v 01 - AC-UNIT BOLT TO UNIT BASE BY M.C. NEOPRENE GASKET BY M.C. -� MASON INDUSTRIES WIC 2" ISOLATOR (TYP 12 PER UNIT) BY M.C. 1" X 3/16" FLAT STRIP ti ti CONTINUOUS BY M.C. MC 5/16" BOLT 24" OC BY M.C. l-- -- STEEL TUBE - SHIM F.S REO'D BY M.C. STEEL CURB BY MECH. -- - CONTRACTOR ,�- METAL ROOF DECK AC UNIT MOLD ON BRACKET , SCALE: NONE M-5 � n,8 FJL Z 0 January 18 , 1994 7- DA Mulvanny Partnership 12200 Northup Way Bellevue, WA 96005 Attention: ,Joel Yamauchi Reference: :;astco - Tigard Itemized Peplies to the plan review comments by Mark Burrows , Building Flans Checker. Joel : 1 . The metal building plans are to be provided by Varco Pruden. 2 . The calculations for the CMU walls are attached. . The exterior CMU walls cantilever up a '-0" from the slab. The walls do not rely on the metal building for lateral support. Please see Sections A-4 and C-7 . 3 . 'The rack supplier will supply the necessary calculations for the racks . 4 . The footing review is pending the plans submittal by Varco Pruden. We also reed to back check our footing sizes against the design loads provided by Varco Pruden. 5. The base plate connections for the mezzanine tube steel columns are the same as at the mail building columns . I am adding section E-4A which will be the same as section E-4 except it will not require the 1 /2" washer Plate for holddown resistance. Also, I 'm using 1 " diameter anchor bolts in lieu of tl 3/4" diameter Kwikbolts shown on calculation sheet, RM-4. 6 . I will be happy to answer any further questions in order to clarify the design of this building. Sincerely, ENGIN ERS NORTHWEST, INC. P. S. Phill 'p Van Heyningen- p. F. Project, Engineer E'NGINFFRS NORTHWEST; INC. RS.•CONSULTING ENGINFIFIS W19 WOODI AWN AVENUE RE. 6EATTLE.WA 116115 (206)625-7,560 FAX IM1 5:2.0600 '-I I u/a c yyt'•� EN61N[ERS NIIN11',VESI 11:1. P.S. 6861 NOODLAYN AVE. M.E. SUITE 205 B-a. N/GiH CA A,r/LE7JE/L6Q SEATTLE, MA, 90115 C IM U w n L l S 7U!' 10 101 WAKE DATE 11[193 SE15rN/C zoNC• 'f :UBIECT 8:i��1/J.f ��J!1N1e1l�S.lS-------SNEfTw{0[_.. �VI7V►� /00►t�p N �)(�J.C �� -----------------------IY _ CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS (CNU) - KNOIN6 CODE - 19?IUPC IS NASJNBY SPECIAL INSPLCIEO? INPUT IY(5 OR NO).............YES I'a ■ 1500 psi 10 • 500 psi Es 21000000 psi K = 1211/bd'2 psi Eo- 1125000 0750ille As . pbd In'2 n= 25.17718 Is • 24000 psi 1• ; Is I K I p I k 1 2/(Jlk: 1.331K: ; [. ; Is ; K p I k ; 2!(J4Yt 1,33/Kt 1 60 124000 1.71163 11.6E-05,'0,0iI 133.715 12.3728 r 1370 ;24000 ;17.6246 ;0.00219 10,284 11.1611 163.499 1 70 124000 :7.31042 : 0.0001 1 0.07 129.284 13.1811 ; 1300 1;1000 149.7503 :0.00229 : 0,29 11.6311 166.334 1 : 80 :24000 13.08159 10.0001.' 10.071 125.761 14.1000 ; 1390 '14000 151.9033 l 0.0024 10.215 1 1.314 161.204 1 : 90 :14000 :1.65001 0.06011 :0.000 :21.311 15.1374 1 1406 ;24000 154.0029 : 0.0015 10.301 :7.3961 172.111 1 :100 :24000 :4.61711 : 0.0407 10.097 ! 71.31 : 6.251 1 4----,- 4--------s--------#--.. . .,-------, '----'------''_--___ -------4------4-------4 - 1110 :24000 156.1881 10.00261 :0,306 ;1.2839 :73.031 1 1110 :24000 :5,60664 10,00074 :0,106 :19.617 :7.4158 1 1420 :14006 158.5184 :0.00712 10.311 :1.1112 111.074 : Mn :24000 16.58968 0.00029 :0.114 : 11.21 :8.1062 : 1430 124000 160,1727 10,00263 10.316 17.0755 1 01.03 1 :130 '24000 11,61061 :0,00033 :0.123 117.011 :10.185 1 :440 :24000 163.0508 10.00294 :0.321 :6.1185 :14,068 1 :140 :14000 :8.15135 ;0.00038 :0.131 :13.998 :11.668 1 :450 :14000 11.5.3516 10.00305 10.126 :G.P4158 111.135 1 :150 12400,1 11.12597 :0.00041 :0.131 :15.111 1:3.214 1 ------4------.._�. .-..-,••----,._...._4-------4 4----4-__- -4- 4--------4------4-------1-------1 1460 114000 161.6746 ;0.00317 10.331 16.7972 190.733 ; :160 :24000 111.15M :0,00041 :0.147 :14.391 :14,070 1 1470 124000 110.0192 10.00328 10.335 16.7124 113.359 I :170 :14000 112.4406 :0.00055 :0.154 :11.656 06.598 ! 1406 :24000 :12.3847 1 0.0034 1 0.34 16.6312 :96.511 1 :100 :74000 :11.1136 !0.00061 10.162 1 13.05 118.391 1 :410 :24000 :14.1705 :0.0035: 10.345 16.5534 119.614 1 :110 :24000 115.1116 :0.00067 :0.169 :11.507 :20.1 , 1 4--.-4------4--------,--------1------,..-.--._,___._.-, 1200 :24000 :16.6406 :0.00074 10.111 112.011 :22.180 ;500 :24000 171„1167 10,00164 10.341 :6.4111 1 102.9 1 4_-__4------4,..._--'-F"---'--4----_-4---.--_4---._---1 4----4------/___.-....1.._...,....1.-.... 1710 :24000 ; 18.139 :0.00081 10.111 :11.571 :24.115 : 1500 123000 :19.0352 1 0.0099 10.351 16.3263 1103.38 : :220 :24000 119.6851 :U,00008 10,191 111.176 126.247 : 1500 112000 ;80.9837 1 0.0042 10.369 (6.114) 1107.78 1 :210 :74000 121.2111 :0.00095 :0.198 : 10.01 !14.369 : 1500 :21000 183.0271 10.00453 1 0.38 16.0:21 1 110.7 1 :2 o :24000 122.9135 :0,00102 10.205 110.471 130.55; 1500 :20000 185.8141 : 0.0149 10.392 15.8103 :113.51 ;150 :24000 :24,5129 1 0.0011 :0.212 :10.166 : 37 11 : ,-...1------_------- _ ____,__-.,,_s•------4--•---_, 4..._4__-_-_4___..____4__-_-_-_,_____-4.__-....... . .-.., ;500 :19000 107,4318 :0.00532 :0.404 15.1187 1;16.38 1 :160 :24000 116.3131 :0.00118 :0,218 :9.8808 :35.083 : 1500 :18000 ;01.8013 1 0.0058 :9,417 15,3613 ;119.74 1 :210 :1400; :28.0746 :0,00126 :0.225 19.6172 :.',433 : 1500 :11000 191.3103 :0.00634 10,431 15.4165 1123.08 1 :280 :24000 129.1744 10.00135 :0.231 :9.3726 :31.832 1 1500 !16000 114.9507 :0.00691 10.446 15.2659 ! 126.6 1 :790 :24000 131.7116 :0.00143 :0.218 :9.1449 142.212 ; 1500 :15000 :97.7392 1 0.0011 10.462 :5.1157 1130.32 1 ;300 124000 :33.5052 :0.00152 10.244 18.9315 : 44 78 1 1 -1-•----1-------4--'-----4------1-------,---•,--4 4----4------4--------4••-------4-----•4-------4--------1 1500 114000 :100.608 :0.00856 10.479 14•909 1134.25 1 ;310 :24000 :35.4931 :0.00161 : 0.25 :8,7331 :47.325 : 1500 113000 1143.009 10.00951 10.498 14.8166 1138.41 1 1370 174000 !31.4367 !0.00171 :0.156 :8.5418 :49.916 1 :500 :12000 :101.116 10,01019 :0,516 :4.6678 1142.12 1 :330 ;24000 :19,4123 : 0.0010 :0.261 ! 8.371 1 52.55 : :500 !11000 !(10 626 :0.01126 1 0.54 14.5198 1 147.5 1 :140 :24000 ; 41.41 :0.00189 :0.267 :8.70BG 155.227 1 '.'100 110000 1114,353 10.01401 10.563 14.3724 :152,41 1 1550 :14000 :47.4385 :0.00119 :0.273 :8.0537 151.945 I 4----4--- --4--------)--------1--'- -1-------4-------4 :360 1:4000 ! 45.527 10.00201 :0.219 :7.9074 :60.703 : T-KLIgb,- ( 4-z3 � z ) ` Q+ I ) q.4� ��Yz�JAr.,✓>. .4E.F .c� g92usr An, =.4a�3si.C5) r4z znS V.C.fr, 1 4z �>L ENGINEERS - NORTHWEST INC. P. S . 6869 WOODLAWN AVE. N.E. - SUITE 205 - SEATTLE,WA 98115 . (206)525-7560 • FAX # (206) 522.6698 Joe No. Jon NAME �� JTGy' `�- DATE . SuairCT '_�Q•_ -a/4Z� �~ C InLL_�-�S ('/ubN• Ibq SHEETW Z OF_ r- s ,w i c_ Fp l Cp l./p - .¢�, (I.d) .� I�✓P - .3 oil•/p /�. pli Co, w7, 50/50 LAA,07,1 C t-r . CI(��ec. 1�/p = 5 ja pe jr F'p �. 3o�SS.� ' 1 .� psF 4.7-- hqi,vCa Ca.v -T�2at,� Ali KD PouT - I•ZIz5. Z psr 4= �� St✓ ,03 7 ( El I<�r K IU e- A"r. - Z - 3 I• I ` /I=r. (I.o4 � II4 -� 1:i' 4A04t'j 7-rL I ►3.=C$ + �� .5;5 IM cAr sr - I. ! 9 (8.�3) = 7.q ZK�j� �.,Ar�, �, �DP,F!; K = 4L -c�q9 - Icsz 10 AJ ?>!5 z, l�) T� n CJ� 1l�JZ # r1L�' • 1 •g1' UK J A vtn r3 T vL I ►�, - 4.3 3 1` Z ) ---4; I I — -- �<Fr Iti1 c.A"'r. = I I ( �4, !�-) - `�. �+ �' t»,ti, v, An =.L-),>-5c, -L 5 z4 .`} Z 7 "LAS V.6,F, Dco►L,g H GRJ�YL'7'Nn� '-2" l7��, 2E4tiu!/1..E VIP 57/Z4CT't4rt.d, J,oH, ►'�yt' ENGINEERS - NORTHWEST INC. PS. 6M WOO DLAWN AVE. N.E.- SUITE 205 - SEATTLE,WA 98115 - (206)525-7560 - FAX # (206) 522-6696 Joo No._ �JJonNAAMP. Ca,l CSD+ DATE SUBJECT_ ..S)40-FT OF -- , 1 G 1C-c�til T L�/•� /�7"r��_ B Y 2f (jr t4 �go�.,�NaxR�f bo x��v7 a I � A�= f•N y �CrJJ.�o�,1� ��L(��/F7'. Clll�l°.Z�? l �• ��' r ��Jr<CI' r T y, z t\j yr-r. r `L Sc���•p �� rJEG(_e�:c:rrcoP 2 33 = .!c(,► kvr , f=b"oF Sc�IL. CpN357106) K.I�T CvNsl~YLIJA L)r, Does n>oT' lNCLUpC A"y.TOIL 01--, PTG S 611 '%4k6 OL. 1)61 .7-0v Vert-K,,AL 4.� �v�Cy �%GTC.t� 7o p f',�a" v r 5oi �. Foy,. ►aASSlub �P . ►v a r C >a ftp V ✓L d u'r vy xN rL to 1 C 1e- 0^.) f"0,^j t iv v,r<a /L O G►l U vt� !�N T � 5 Liv✓L G E✓L /. 1 Q t o�ro�a✓t.�t9 T rs/►d f Hd�� V1=✓L '7'Nt: SOIL / S UI°wAA0Le-orUF1 ►VC0 a/)/T"r /V"s�_A►'� Pio SS/ Ee�t�.lJ�T n,EGt ECr T,yt� l'r,� oo�-�FSe��G Fn ENGINEERS - NORTHWEST INC. P. S. 61369 WOODLAWN AVE. N.E.- SUITE 205 - SEATTLE.WA 96115 - (206)525.7560 - FAX N (206) 522-6699 --.Joe NO. JOA NAME _ _ - DATE -. SUBJECT- _ ---------SHEET-_QF- - _- 8r E(_ a E3~ G VLA ' ti M i ►v , V,/N LC_ G�L (gya 7' I Z b A 0D SLAQ's or 1.'43' IAF O k oy I I . I v i to vNLLSs M,t$.J. INUII.AIL:> UN 1HUR U11.) LARGLIt Ei0LT5 ARE REQUIRED. SHOULD LARGER BOLTS BE REQUIRED AND M.U.S. HAS NOT INDI( ATED SO ON THEIR BID [FIE' M.H.S. IS TO SUPPLY THE LARGER BOLTS, ;PECIFICALLY AT NO EXTRA(7.ST, EVEN IF EXCLUDED F-140M fill-IR! DID, '�.FTER COL. EREC CLOSURE KEERECTION'JT----_�__ T.S. COL. PLR METAL ``� BLDG. SUPPI IC.R (M.F1^.,) 4-1"0 All._-1HREAD (U.N,O,) - GONCREIE IN-FILL (FM©CD 10 MIN,) 1 J" MIN. ALL AROUND 1}" MAX. NON-SHRINK I I lI SLAB REBAR TIGHT TO LEVELING GROUT —� I - CLOCKOUT TYP. .-k ; T ('J.N.O. -� b - (RODS -4A: SUHSTIIUTE 4-1"0 ON PLANS) n BOLTS OR ALL THREAD s & j"WA41H+>a17— ftt I W W 111 I 1— 9 . 44 IlI� J�!1!r; - 1- T- fll -rr� WASHER SAME SIZE x HOLD Col., & AS COL. IIRG. R +- -_ SPREAD FIG. 2"GLR, _ SIZE PER PLAN N07E; WEND THREADS " 4+— RFINF. PER SCHEDULE r_ MIN. PAST DBL, MOTS ON 7Y P. SECTION r -- 4 <& E4 1" 1 0- FREE DR.AINING BACKFILL. PER ' SOILS ENGINEER•- -r_ -PIPE MIL. GUARD-RAIZ. 10 PFR ARCH, UWGS. (� - nf-J) - —2 #4 NA H. (` -� I- 00W Da 7T0 HOLD 1 t . 4v CLR. 3"0 WEEP HOLES 0 A4 01 lU"o/c V,N.F, L 8'-0"o/C (ABOVE. CURB) �� N4 at 12."o/C H. CONC, CURB 1 ER z 1-- 2 I rARCH. w/y4 1 0 1frO/C 9 #4 ----- 0.-;- 0 18-o/c 1 k 2 #a CONT. TOP 0 1 o = •- T-�.� r- RAMP SLAB W/ . !y 4 1 tf o/c T. n \ 4 W 1 Pl o/o 0 ' x� Z- EPTH. DRAIN IF REWD 0' _ _ p By SOILS OR Q ' _ 1,_ _:_�_ L �J _PER PLAN � . CIVIL ENGINEER- J J 00 ;7 (PCR PLAN) -111 oil LuLOWEST fINIFHED j=[1j ,, CRAVE TO TOP Of Lo ° - �u 1 , ,,.1= 7•• -2 p5 R.D. CUNT. ITC, PER SECT, A--4 O 1'--G 13" 1'-0 ; 5 CONT. SOILS PER SOILS _ ENG;NEER CL o F5.0 L .1 F9.c b coNT:' � I . •'' A-7 I FTG. /�;• I F3.5 ' I .H= WHERE FTGS. d I OVERLAP CAST. FIGS. TOGETHER ;dc LAP REINF. TYP. -1'-4" F5. rn- i J. F3.51 F3 5 F9.0 (-2'�g �. 11: f ST Pte. Q I .I q.q4 NIVA ,of r,",'a,xr•:x''-.r I �� ,^Tf� o • (r�rr�IJ 1°—�` CONT. 1 r E 4A rr: ti'+.;'Fyx;.: AN FTG. TYP. F"3.5 F3 5. •'• .r I ,�,ro t.,,�M'' �• .1' 1 .1.1 � . ' F7.t� •r4,` M f.�.If,1�.0 I F3.51 F3 •'vK..1. ;,',l '1"r''�''1'•`�i���ti'�l1 i'0�!'/Nr�,el��j1«' ^,'1•'') -r , », 1 ,� ` 1. r il'�1•rrC :/ti 2'- 9 � ;•� i , 1)11•' J..S ',{�y%'- ,'•• t I ,1 a (n (/� :?it+ir'•"J n (n: 'r7fp"I-::...1 V 1- 161 �r I� »1„• t J 61 C ;,:"' ,114/1. i •o'( •n' rllr-, I.4 '�'b,!im• 1 01-A "' ' M "' •Y rj -+... ---,--- 1hi '.� .4 r. ;\.•, I 'f .Y ����I�1.it i��'I 1 Iu . F1'1'.-• p� [ F7.5 ' r „� r,r't lf� 1 •94 : � ,",U• � r�1 i I V 111 '�1C1. " 7 1 �.� 1�,/�Jf' �., ire• 1; N —�.r+o �r. r � '' !If,t ' �� I y�1r~� 1'A�'7 I�Yi'y rr ��.',.•,t, �5, �� (t i N d 'i•I'.. ..J � .�•' �'."r"/11���, .1�1"� r�'��,Y � tri . . '�:•31^4N � ,,.r;r,�',y�� � /�,�y,.., .r` .� STEP 251.4" STErTG P ,.,,, '.,, I � 1 », L•�a � .j•� 1', �.'' .n 1 ?�y.,:r1►� M r. I rr Sim. F5.0 r ia%`� _ .... El EV. _..._ (..y-4 � P4.5'(-5'r,4 �.✓ o �� a_, o_a ,• 41iZ11, , , I � 1 A .h"•. '''✓„'' 1, -•.T�,f�r NfJ' '1 ` I1� ,1 1.. , �, ( I w4 —� ;1..1'•.7: rr.';' ;S'' SIV�/f ILS« 0 n`P . January 1$, 1994 L!J Mulvanny Partnership 1 :200 Northup Way Bellevue, NA 96005 Attention : Joel Yamauchi Reference: Costco - Tigard Itemized replies to the plan review comments by Murk Burrows , Building Plana Chuckor . ,Joe 1 : i . The "natal building plans are to be provided by Varco Pruden. 2. The calculations for the CMU walls are attached. . The exterior CMU walls cantilever, up 8 '-0" from the slab. The walls do not rely on the metal building for lateral support. Please see Sections B-4 and C-7 . 3. The rack supplier will supply the necessary calculattions for the racks. 4 . The footing review is pending the plans submittal by Varco Pruden. We also need to back check our footing sizes against the design loads provided by Varco Pruden. 5. The base Platte connections for t;io mezzanine tube steel columns are the same ao at the main building columns. I am adding section E-4A which w i 1 1 be the sarrlo as section E-4 except it will riot require the 1/2" washer Plate for holddown resistance. Also, I 'm using I " diameter anchor bolts in lieu of the 3/4" diameter Kwikbolts Shown on calculation shoet I111-4. 6 • I will be happy to answer any further questions in order to clarify the design of this building. Sincerely, ENGINEERS NORTHWEST, INC. P. S. Phi11 p Van Neyningen; P. E. Project Engineer ENGINEERS NORTHWEST, INC. PS.•CONSULTING ENGINEERS 6869 WOOOLAWN AVENUE N.E. SEAMIF,WA 08115 (206MS-7560 FAX 17061 522-e-190 . 9/u/ac yti,(•� FNGIRMS-N11RIMS1 INC. P.S. 6067 400DLANN AVE. N.E. SUITE 205 `Q` ►a I G N CA iv rI C Eb'6/LELJ SfAffl.r, WA, 101(5 U4(A w,ut,+_5 jur YU. :O9 NAM[(' jto _............_.DATE ."tl(9/93 �t.15rI�/G ZUNI` SUBJECT to,:S2,.Nl.k.'.fes!947101!'`Sd.S._---•511fE1V[�Or...-- 1,1Va.)-----------------------AY _ 0INCREIE nASONRY UNITS (f,MUI - 900I1,16 CODE• 1911U9C IS nASONP.Y SPHIA!, INSPECIEO? INPUT Mr. OR NO).............YES 1'. 1500 psi 10 500 psi Is 21000000 psi K = 12.44d'I psl 1115000 -750sf's As m pbd In'1 n= 2;.11778 Is 24000 psi f• Is I K ; p k : 2/ljtk; 1.33IK: Is : K ' p 1 k : 2/l tkl 1.311K1 60 :24000 :1.71161 :T.6E 05 :0.061 133.715 :2.3720 : 1370 ;24000 :47,6746 :0.00719 :0.204 :1,1611 163.499 1 70 124000 ;2,31012 : 0,0001 1 0.01 :21.794 :3.1017 :300 :74000 ;49.1501 ;0.00711 1 0.29 :7.6381 166,334 I 119 :24004 13.08159 :0.00613 10.071 125.161 14.1Olin : :710 :14000 151.1033 1 0.0024 10,295 ; 7.514 169.204 1 10 :14000 :3.95002 :0.00017 ;4,000 :2.1.111 15.11:14 1 :100 :14000 154.0029 : 0.0025 10.301 :7.3961 172.111 1 ;100 :71040 :1.0771 0.0007 :0.011 : 21.31 ; 6.257 : +•---I ..--•-►--------+--------/...... I.._.._..►..... -+'..----'-------+ ;410 ;21000 :56.7091 10.007[1 :0,106 11.1039 ;75.051 1 ;110 :14000 15.606114 ;0,00014 10.196 119.611 :7.4119 : ;120 :24001 158.5104 :0,00712 ;0,311 0.1111 119.074 1 :170 124000 3.50969 :0.00029 ;0.114 ; 10.21 :8.7852 : 1410 ;24000 :60,1729 10.00203 10.315 11.0755 1 01.03 1 v :130 124444 ;1,63067 :4,00033 10,123 ;17,011 :10.105 : 1440 :24000 163.0500 10.00294 10,111 :6,119S :A4.06d I :140 1240110 :8.15115 ;0.000311 ;0.131 117.190 111.660 1 1450 :24000 165.3516 10,00305 ;0.326 :6.8050 (81.135 1 ;150 111440 11.12537 :0.00041 ;0.131 115.111 :13.131 : +----►------►-..------+--------J.-,---+•-_---^+---,•---+ '----+------'--------+--------I------I-------I-------I 1460 :74000 167.6744 :0,00311 10,331 16,7'172 ;90.271 :160 124000 :11.1505 :0.00041 :0.141 :11.111 :14,07n ; 1470 171000 :70.0117 10.001211 10,335 16.7121 113.151 1 1110 ;74000 :11.4406 ;0.40015 :0.151 111.656 ;11,.5In : :4110 :14000 ;12.31141 : 0.0034 1 0.34 16.6317 ;96.611 1109 :14000 ;11.7116 :0.04061 10.162 1 13.05 118.311 ; :410 :24000 :14.7105 :0.00352 IO 34S I6.5534 1'19.61: I :190 :24000 115.1116 :0.00067 ;0.169 112.501 :10.255 : 1.-1......I--------+.. ------4_.___„I____,...4 1200 174004 116.6106 :4,00011 10.177 ;17.011 122.190 : 1500 :24000 111.1767 10.00164 ;01341 :6,1191 1 101.9 1 '910 :24001 : 18.139 :0.20001 10.184 :ff,577 :21,195 : :500 :13000 119.0352 1 0.0011 :0.951 3.3761 1145.38 1 ;220 :24000 111.64'j1 10.000011 10,111 111.176 12(,.247 1 :500 :22000 ;90.9037 1 0.0041 10.369 16.1111 1101.10 1 1)90 :24000 ;;1.1171 :0.00015 :0.190 1 10.111 :10.169 : :500 :21000 f83.0271 10.00451 1 0.10 :6.0211 1 110.1 1 :740 ;?1000 :27.9115 10.00102 10.705 110,414 :30,551 1 ;500 ;20000 185.1747 ; 0.0049 10.311 15 '0701 :113.51 1 ;750 :74000 :24.5929 1 0.0011 ;0.212 ;10.166 31,19 ; ►--...►...----►-- -------- +......_+-------► 4----4------I•-•-----I-..----•4•-----I-------►-----••i :500 :11000 :81.1110 10.00532 :O.iO4 11,1191 1116.SA 1 :?60 :74040 126.3131 :0.09:10 :0.710 :1.11908 :35.095 ; :500 118000 101.8073 : 0.0059 :0,417 :5.5615 ;119,14 2 :710 :74000 :28,0746 :0.00;16 In.775 11.6172 :37,431 : :500 :11000 :12,3103 :0.00614 10,431 15,116:, ;171.00 1 ;1110 :24000 129.9744 MOMS 10.211 :9.3726 :39.037 1 :500 :16004 :11.9501 10.00691 10,446 15.2651 : 116.6 1 :710 174000 131,7116 ;0.00141 :0.2111 :1,1449 :42.IO2 : 1500 :15000 197.7311 1 0,0077 10.462 15.1157 1130.32 1 :300 124000 111.5052 :0.00152 :0.7 4 :0.1375 1 44.78 1 I I------I--•--•-- ------I-------I_.,_-__� I I------►--------I-------••I--- -t ------- MO 114000 :100.688 M OOR% 10.419 14.9659 1134.75 1 1310 :24000 :35.4931 :0.00161 : 0.15 10.1'131 :41.315 : 1500 111000 ;101.009 10.00151 10,199 11.0166 113A.41 I ;170 :74000 111.4361 :0.00171 :0.756 :R.Sf10 141.916 1 1500 112400 :101.:16 16.01011 10,519 :13618 1141.117 1 :330 :24000 :11.4111 1 0.0018 :0.70 ; 0.173 1 52.55 : 1500 :11000 :110.626 :0.01121 1 0.54 11.5199 1 141.5 1 1.140 :74000 : 41.42 'MOIRI :0.267 :9.2004 155.221 1 1500 :10400 1114.153 10.41409 10.563 14.1774 1152.41 1 1150 :74000 :43.4585 ;0.00111 :0.113 :9.'4537 151,145 1 +----I------I--------I........1.._....►-------I-------4 �� :360 174000 : 45.517 10.00201 :0.219 :1.1074 :60,703 1 0- X1-1-4" JAmn, TPIL "r� _ \ ��'T3 h Z ) - QII'}1 I<yr 115 z(5) z'l. .9 z. > > zA.S V.�.� .4:Z . 4,L ts1L ENGINEERS -- NORTHWEST INC. P. S. 6860 WOODLAWN AVE, N.E. - SU IT E 205 • SEATTLE,WA 98115 • (206)525.7560 • FAX # (206) 572-6698 Jo© No, JOB NAME �Q 1TCv- S D ti r E ��.�Q_�.0 IS Na."• Ia n 4,� b1 E ETf._ OF By 6"/ SeLI 1 ISP = l <P �140 —c. `I•U) .1J wp — • l�jGwp �. toll C 0, 50 5 U L4 n.,1 T Z c:/L T p , L°Ka"'d 4 1,. /p = 6 E paF" r RR ��' x 3�C a�+. = 1 � T p S f� c"-- 1►•,/ I N�1 C O N T o'L b�, PCX4T I•Z1 ()• t- Z p 5 F (A 5G .c7J 1 4 ( �)Z 1 IUGA/v7• _. _Z = f. � Kf r /FT. (I.04 I - (-0!5)L I0 - ,<1 s - . c Hca 3 �����a ) ?q - C7, z--7- C° L A N K• W A l_ LA S lr 71 15 e 2�{-"c� Y 1=== LI 5 E -0992 I�sz .. . � s ,- ,l 6'A, n»E/u•c 6CCS As - . c3o - . S� ,n.�x 3 � ✓Gf=' e 1_ 4" J A AA p _ T rt,I K'a. Y14 c A..�T. � I. 1 bl � 4` I�' = `I q AG r = r� 12,A n•C4u 1rtC V,/ ENGINEERS - NORTHWEST INC. P. S. 6869 WOO DLAWN AVE. N.E.- SUITE 205 - SEATTLE,WA 98115 • (206)525.7F60 - FAX iv (206) 522-6698 JOD No.._. ___JOO NAMF. _.(f05i CC 6U19JFCT_ � "�_ � -�IdN /. G ►Vi (/l_� LL —�N l� SHECT_j/✓r3 OF MA lam. G✓L��rJ.@ Zh`�aC. kra C"rL n 4o,�B6a3)�. /D 61) 'l(o. '+ ,►•�r n,O anw7nr,i,�, N4 O. �ti Nn c�G �Z k esT t c L4 Ca Lk r- J� tj <4 UEC.T•r ILG"a,F5e-I L. CPN351u � -h K Ft' <'_ �U✓l.'� .�j ,dal.-► -'= ��U � > v�c`vs D 1G p a C s /v o T' J ry c u pp r AN//y.S o l L 0" P T'4 5 'SLA (5 O L, �.) c'.1.5 NC'n r;\I_ 1 S -- Ca s5 Ptis,51 JG t. .zoo rvorl,nlAL ! S N(F-(5 LL5C.'reD Top I'•o" v tc Soi t,. F'oyL. PAs51U6 Pp . rb Ll, 15 ro el. O t4l vy�xin. k ►G/< c�lV fin► . ,tom 1 �-..-VA/ZD 6t4C?"4l;IU7- / 5 LN✓L FI'L /, 1 �cQ.+,�p✓ut9To/�aF No)-6UtF_ . THC: SbIL 1 ,5 u,0v,e4rLdL�, coyU�, �vG �yWe L.A6 sc) -r1-Ic Ppssivc SLC-S�.sT0,4N,,C`lS CA 7f � c�.� vvCiuLt7rll'T p4 aslvEd 7"a�o ,roo,-7_c, ENGINEERS - NC^T HWEST INC. IPS. W9 WOOOLAWN AVE. N.C.- SUITE 205 • SEATTLE,'IVA 98115 - 12061525-7560 - FAX # (206) !;22-6698 '---Joe NO. Joo NAME SUBJECT - OATE -- SHCET OK 64 g C_; YLT r,CD p r • 0-7,e x 8 . 091, 3 — 13 r,c. �-4y _ A oJ) SLAk's .ta 5 k3f 1143� Ar T- rJ E T T b F- (� ` ��cP ' I (I i v r a vNLI.SJ M.tl.s. 1NVIUAILJ UN THLIH till) LAHGLH HOLTS ARE REQUIRED. SHOULD LARGE(\ BOLTS 1317 REQUIRCD AN( M.L).S. IIAS NOT INOIGATL D SO ON THEIR HID THF M.H.S. 15 TO SUPPLY THE LARGER BOLTS, CLOSURE KEY GROUTSPECIFICALLY AT NO EXTRA AST, EVEN IF EXCLUDED FROM IIICIIZ DID. 1FTER COL. FRECTION �•`"'�-- /-- T S, COL. PER METAL 4-1-0 ALL-THREAD (U.N.O.) ``�,�__-- BLDG. SUPPLWR (M.P,S.) (EMBED 10" MIN.) ;,f CONG?LTE IN-FILL 7 / 1j" MIN. ALL AROUND MAX. NON-SHRINK I I 1 'l-An REOAR TIGHT TO L&ELING GROUT i OLOCKOUT TYP. Jwl I� .moi-fir.'/�f'�.r.1. �_ � I � Q a •. r . r. ON PL/'NS) 7 F:-4A: SUBST1rUTE 4-1"ro r v v p !r a r b i . ti A UOLTS OR ALI. TARE NO o u RODS do f WA�N13 I III 1!I1-rIiAJ Oil I_I,++--I u�r -r��ITf�I � �' #" WASHER SAME. SIZE x r> C01., do /�i COL. URG. R HOLD SN1?LAU f TG. ' 7."CLR, 51ZC PER PIAN NOTE: WEND THREADS ` REINF. PER SCHEDULE -r.-v MIN, PAST DBL, NUTS ON SECTION E - 4 �c E -- 4 A TaV. TYP. , FREC DRAINING BACKFILL PEI? SOILS CNGINCF_Rr _ V-PFR PIPC MTL. GUARD-RAIL ARCH. DINGS. y- =o— 7. #4 H, CUNT. 1 E.F. 4k 0�j o�o( ( ( ) - 0u�c, o HULU 1 w •;' CLR. _ 3'0 WFEP HOLES ri Q �i - -•' 94 at 10"o/c V.N.F. t r fl'-0"o/c (ABOVE CURB) ' -- #4 at 12-o/cCONC. CURB I'ER r 2 ARCH. w 4 f - it 1!f o/c A 14 I t;^�- Gl 18"0/c ! SIC 2 #4/ONT. TOP n RAMP SLAG W/ 1 ry r -� 4 0 18'0/0.0 ocsz - ft1D- EPTH. u o5, DRA114 1F RFQ'D (y Fly SOILS OR c I'ER PLAN �` CIVIL ENGINEER �Q�C IN - ISI .� - .- --_�T J J (PCR PLAN) e" J (r LOWEST rINISHED GRADE TO TOP 4F - -•o ��-` ?- ,,,� 2" 2 #5 R.D. CONT. FTG, PER SECT. n-4 J u -n� 1'-0 S N5 CONT. 1-). 2' -0' SOILS PER SOILS -- - ENGINEER F5.0 4 t_ �' i FDA I A l I FTG. r3.5 lMLL W IRE FrGS. I UVF.RI_AP CAST FIGS. TOGETHER ,dc LAP RFINF. TYP, '. I 51 F3 5F'9 t Tp CFTC 1""If�•44' N �. nii:�r,'l,Y��i..,•'�. Olh��r. '4A 1 —O" CONT. '1' . FTG.V TYF' M �'•:' f— rwl 1+'dl,l �1 ♦' (U.N 0.1 F3.5 F3 5. .. 'iJ' ,� " ' f �r I', 'Y I b � ,6,h r E_J' '1'" h'' '.�' r, �6; ��i•'i .� +a' ,•'�'. ,�., ',�1•;�+ x"s•,10 JQ\•'I. M� F•7.o L_-�r f , • ; �,+r , 1' , ,X�1+1; bF, r ,~,', I F'3.51 F� �'!'`=�" !1 •rYhiw ` ,�',pF.g.O FFIS I J 5 '.• .. '�Jr t/Y 4.1 I1 (S5^O 'P/ Ik�r I if(in `r� • .,� ,� r "rl f Y l�� e�'�, a�r'•+�I t `".r'',' IGS,~,► �Ir. 14 O y'15 0" a' 16',.pN,;'.., .;.,114'- AMA, Y- .1 Nhl n {IY� , �tl yr�,, 1 l "' ,r• • I �,� ¢I I 4 r t' IY!.1� S ��'(!' �h r•. i✓ L>; ','. l,2 h,:fip' �•k�?I, ',• w �,1, ,Cf r'' •F7711: , ,,• , r , " •i,,t1r I.Re r� :•,,/� (:,'��'�r ( � 1. . r, /� ;,i cjy yi'^Yifl ?�i�•F'10. 0 -� �� „7 ,` ,' i •�� r f,.f,��,r��,'.YIy�.�T ..• �1y,.�1�;1/"+1,p`l '� �' �� ` `— 't 1,(* •Y .,. J•67' •� '5� ''h2r�LK' Mr'• ,'�1. �i is ' •,. gin' 1,6 ' •r., T�+. -� ” 1.1J ,1 ►`� 'b --�~--STtfi _F•3.5 -25'-4 24'- STEP 1 P 10 f'►."a 5 ' ,�j�_ 1 ��t '�' •.f a�J �,hy �'. '• �� , ' r '• r �'' iS�' I G y�,.K � IF r ;i ,"'1,' y• �� E, K-4 ; r.;�,--�'":•; �`.r.:�: r ', ... � ,� `1 SIM,. I •,,• �:'S'; � ::�' I ! rY''I' ! '� I '>� .,.I I I � ,, D 9 45 ELEV. ,F"4.5 F5.0 b I i' II.�N 7 2 1 1 -21 31 3p0 AFZP1 _ gU Lf: ,° -• r' " I � �_, 1.1 1 _ ! 3'-6' I F 'I !13 RLI ` 151 I, -- �. L N9 JAN -I- ii� u I e_aca Roa-� 1 1- .III -{ �caMPtltfrlM er���, - _ — - Ell I ; - I 23� ! -iAIN-LINK ? \ „ I 24 26 LII I 7 II i VAU T CII] I f►��;1- - a_a-1crz - IR Ff CII� FLL. _ b3l' CII] I OfITOr-rr: Y 12OJ TIRE �ZI�?11 - 30"2t#- i�' "'T -� INSTA-LL.ATION E2 f DO XAM FL. Cq� ! lL '�►��`t-r- i 11 A 3� I CI11 I S LOFT FLR FTF ° ! II I 701 I j 1211� I I I vee . `''� r I `--a-- rte - i = 91 � i II A I o I I I Ih-rr,-, I LI lm-SII ---------------- I II ( I 4-4 d - � �- -- .- 1 _1__J I I — I�• - —a cYl � I H I • . m-�gl uLl n0-,LI ink :C=(D -o _ I I in (� I in nI I II 1- -- 1 -1-- -I---J . Q A I I fir_ H -L__1 m ..m-,£9 T ==1= ==:i==: =1 I I I 1_- 1_ In fn TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE; & RESCUE; AND BEAVERTON FIRE UEPARTMEAT 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive • P.O. Ilex 4755 • Beaverton, OR 97076• (503) 526.2469• FAX 526.2538 January 13, 1994 Mulvanny Partnership 12200 Northup Way Bellevue, Washington 98005 Re: Price/Costco, Inc. 7855 S.W. Dartmouth Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building code (UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other local ordinances and regulations. Plans for the above captioned project cannot be approved at this time by this office. Please address, revise and correct the following items as necessary subm-ftting plans, specifications and responses for review and approval . 1 . Material Safety Data Sheets (MS2t5 MSDS and quantities of hazardous materials as classified in Uniform Fire Code Section 80.202 shall be submitted to this office for review. Methods of storage shall also be submitted to this office for review and approval . 2 . Nigh Piled Stock Access to Building: Uniform Fire Code Section 80.109 (b) requires and opening not less than 3 feet 0 riches by 6 feet 8 inches be provided in each 100 feet or fraction thereof of wall E:ccessible by required fire department access roadways for high piled stock. This Plans Examiner believes that adequate numbers of openings are provided and they are of adequate size. The openings, however, need to be better distributed around the outside of the structure at the north and south ends. Please note: openings near the garbage compactor and the adjacent area will not be considered because those openi y may not to readily accessible for fire fighting O vity. "Working"Smoke Drtectat,;Save I ivcti Mulvanny Partnership January 13, 1994 Page 2 3 . Address Required_ The building space numver must be prominently displayed on the street front where it is readily visible to drivers and officers of respond:na fire apparatus and other emergency vehicles. UFC Sec. 10.208 4 . Fire Extinguisher Requirements: Not less than one (1; approved fire extinguisher(s) with a rating of not less than (*) shall be provided for each (**) , quare foot of floor area or fraction thereof. The travel distance to an extinguisher frim any portion of the building shall not exceed 75 feet . UFC Sec. 10 . 505 (*) 2A10B:C, - Light and ordinary Hazard 4A10B:C - Extra Hazard (**) 3 000 - Light Hazard 1, 500 ordinary Hazard 1, 060 - Extra Hazard Note: Where flammable or combustible liquids are used, "B" ratings of extinguishers may need to be higher and travel distances shorter. See requirements in National Fire Protection Association Standard 10-1 . 5. Automatic Sprinkler Plans: Plans referred to and examined Ey this office contain no provisions for the alteration or installation of automatic sprinkler system. Not less than three sets of plans for the installation shall be submitted to this office for approval prior to installation. UBC 302 (b) 6. Fire Flow: Calculated required fire flow for this building is 2, 600 _qpm as prescribed by Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Fire Prevention Ordinance and the Uniform Fire Code. Fire District records indicate an available fire flow in this area of approximately .1, 454 qpm in 1985. At the other end of the newly developed S.W. Dartmouth Street, fire flow indicates approximately 2,219 gpm. Required fire flow shall not exceed either 3, 000 gpm or the available fire flow. One of two options needs to be taken to reduce the required fire flow. Either area separation walls shall be installed in the building thus reducing the overall area to a size that will comply with the available fire flow or increase the type of Mulvanny Partnership January 13, 1994 Page 3 construction from Type V-N to a higher level of construction which will reduce the basic fire flow. ' Additionally, Bob Fryer (503-� 26-2469) of this office should be contacted to make further flow tests in the area to up-date fire district records and determine if the current data is correct. 7. Knox Box: Install a Knox Box Key Box at the main entrance of the facility. Enclosed is an application � and instructions for ordering and installation. 8 . Curtain Boards: Plans did not indicate depth of draft curtain boards shown on page A-8 . UFC Tbl . 81 .107A 9. Spacing of Curtain Boards: Curtain board plans indicated over spacing of curtain boards. UFC Tbl . 81 .107A. 10 . SRacing of Smoke Vents: Smoke vent plans did not show compliance of spacing with Uniform Fire Code Table 81 .107A. 11 . Smo' e Vents Specificatio�� No specifications were provided with smoke vents. Smoke vents shall comply with Unifo_•m Fire Code Section 81 .107. Uniform Fire Section 81 .107(b)i last sentence has been interpreted by this fire district to require remote manual release from an area other than on the roof and not in the portion of the building which smoke vents are serving, i .e. , totally separated by not less than 1 hour occupancy separation and accessible directly from the outside or on the outside of the structure. 12 . Fire Fightinn_Wa.ter Supply and Access Roadways: Fire ; fighting water sapply and access roadways shall be installed and functional prior to construction of the building. UFC Article 87 13 . No Parking Signs: Install no parking signs on one side of all of tho shaded road surface area shown on sheet C-01 . These roads are being considered as emergency accoss routes. No parking signs shall state, "NO PARKING", "TOW AWAY ZONE", ''F.TRE LANE", "ORS 98 .810-812" . They shall be posted no closer than 4 feet to the ground nor higher than 6 feet above the ground and shall be placed often enough to be conspicuously seen. UFC 10.207(1) M,ulvanny Partnership January 13, 1994 Page 4 14 . Fire Hvdrant Locations: Fire hydrants need to be relocated or added as follows: a. Relocate hydrant located at northeast corner of building to the parking island directly diagonal from the northeast corner of the building labeled 112L.S 18-•inch storm. b. Hydrant located at the northwest corner of the building needs to be moved south to the first parking island. C. Hydrant located at the west side of the building towards the south end needs to be moved to the parking island adjacent the 900 bend and thrust block note at the southwest corner of the building. d. Two additional hydrants need to be added in parking strips and on the ouisi.de of the access roadway at about the center paint of the north/south run of the building on the east and west sides . e. An addition hydrant needs to be added at the double back 11ow preventor/fire department connection located on S.W. Dartmouth. 15 . Recommendations: An additional water service needs to be added at the south entrance off of S.W. Dartmouth and connected into the loop around t'ic building. This would greatly enhance the water supply to the automatic sprinkler systems . 16. Pressurized Hydrants: Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Fire Prevention Ordinance requires fire hydrants within 250 feet of all portions of the structure. Fire Prevention Ordinance goes on to state that "hydrants pressurized by fire department connections will not be counted as part of the required hydrants noted above in this .item" . Plans need to be revised and resubmitted for review and approval of the alteration of fire fighting water system. Mulvanny Partnership January 13, 1994 Page 5 li . Supervision of Valves: All valves (except road box key valves) controlling water suppli-es to automatic fire protection systems and hydrants shall be central station supervised by a U.L. listed Fire Marshal approved central station (see attached) . 1.8 . Testing of Underound Maim All private fire protection underground piping shall be installed, flushed and tested in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Standard 7.4 . All piping, flushing of piping, and tests shall be witnessed by a member of this office. Please provide 24 hour notification prior to anticipated test and inspection times. contact person is Assistant Fire Marshal Jerry Runyan (503-526-2469) . 19 . Contractor's Material Test Certificate: After completion of all installation, testing and flushing of underground piping and' appurtenances, a Contractor's Material Test Certificate shall be completed and properly signed. A copy(s) shall be forwarded to this office for permanent file. If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 526-2502 . Sincerely, Gene Birchill, DFM Plans Examiner GB:kw Enc. cc: City of Tigard Building Department Commercial Building_Permit j1pp?y ationVED City sof Tigard � 13125 SW Hall Blvd. r fZ\! - 8 199 , 9 Tigard, OR 9722.3 (603) 639-4171 Job9tte Address: ,Tenant: 5 Valuation., ��� /�___ Owner: ur i r Address: _ I8.9 12 0 t t1 V e• IV.L --. Kiri,land,WA 98083 (Phone: ( 206 ) 881.-7600 Contractor: Robinson Construction Address: 21.360 NW Cornell. ltd._ Hil sboro, �R 9il24-9321.. Typo 0 oonst:�N Fu l ly s -L'jjUered 0ocupancy dans: B-2/B-1 Phone: ( 503 ) 645-8581 Sprinldered? �e`s No Contractors Lkkgnse M _ f -- (attach copy u4cuffe.M Oregon O wnse) Sq. tt.of prolec.m / Story(9 st, 2nd, etc.) (1 )0 n e ---- A W*gCt/Eaig~ M u l v a n ny P a i_t n e r s h iE! � proposed use: Retail/C o mm"C i ,41 iddrpes: 12200 No i-t h u Way Note: Pkart" & modumW plans muhrt be m tx►iittsd st time of Bellevue, W A 98005 butidatg permit appt'tcatbn. Phone: ( 2.0 6 ) 881 7600 , OOMMENTS: _ na'_'1p!fr�` "k;ant;nature& Pion r I i Received by:� V nate Received: ' G Permit # Account Fjwcrlptlon Amount Amt. Pd. Dal. Due • Bldg. Permit (BUILD) tL,./ Plumb. Permit (PLUMB) _ Mech. Permit (MECH) / State Tax (TAX) Bldg. Plumb: Mecca Pian Check (PLANCK) Bldg: Plumb: Mech: >VT� f $ewer Conne_li,n (SW1SA) o J -�� '�� • (�j. G� c. } Slt►wer Inspectiorq, (SWINSP) Parks Div Charge (PKSDC) Drainage Chg (�DSDC4 a►�'�' � �._ Residential TIF (TIF-R) � Mass Transit TIF (TIF-MT) Commercial TIF (TIF-C) ►� i� Industrial TIF (11F4) 7� / wr(-11 Z institutional 71F (TIF-IS) Office TIF (TIF-0) Water(:Duality (WOUAL) Water Ouarrtity (WOtI:*ttT) Fire District (FIRE) Ll L T I N' OF I I GIAD krl-.".*"F:,I PT OV V-,AVMI'r4 f 3. 11'.1. K 01111),JN I ;:`Q,166P. Vi MF GUS I 1+0�111 iIMI HINI W. 044 1 DDRESS I OCA09 Ir-110,114 (Avf N1 NI 1441t 1{:'/P /43 KIRKLOND, WO UIlPUW- I Ii. I,,f rf MI I-) I F.A%IIINI POID PIIF(PtI'Sl- 111 PI1-VW. Nl filyltillf"if PWI, 1.01"I r.f4F1'.I< 1 F. � il0l , AM010,11 POW CITY OF TIGARD December 14, 1993 OREGON ATTENTION: Joel The building permit fees for Costco located on Dartmouth Street were established by the following criteria: 1. 155,400 sq. ft. , 5N construction. 2 . The State of Oregon Building val.uat.i_on data for various occupancies and types of construction teles us to use $30 . 79 per square foot for permit purposes. 3 . 155,400 sq. ft. X 530 . 79 = $4,784,766 valuation. 4 . Assessed fees according to the structural specialty code fee tables: a. Building permit fee - $1.2, 144 .92 b. 5% state surcharge - 607 .25 C. Plan review fee - 7,910,62 T}� above fees are subject to change if the square footage or type of construction is different than what is stated in this letter, or if the replacement cost of the building is higher than the assessed valuation. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call . Sincerely//, Mark Burrows Plans Exeaniner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., ilgard, OR 97223 (.503) 639-4171 D (,503) 684-2772 --------------------_------------ • `13 •o-}S.05 -.crFIVF_C1 R ZA A R A Inc. �� ; 3 1993 7477 SW Tech Center Drive Portland, Oregon 97223-8024 (Formerly: Rittenhouse-Zernan&Associates, Inc.) „ _ ...,��y�Hr�'s (503) 639-3400 Engineering & F_nvironmenta! Services FAX (503) 620-7892 August 11, 1993 21-06984-00 Costco Inc. c/o Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 12200 Narthup Way Bellevue,WA 98005 Attn: Mr. Kelly McBride. SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION PROPOSED COSTCO STORE TIGARD,OREGON Dear Mr. Mcbride: In accordance with Costco's authorization, we conducted five additional borings on the proposed Costco store site In the residential subdivision that was not previously accessible to us. The proposed building pad Is situated in this area. The approximate location of the borings is shown on the attached site plan. Logs of the borings are also included at the end of this letter. The purpose of the addhioanl subsurface explorations was to confirm geotechnical soil conditions In the proposed building area, and screen for possible environmental contamination. A letter report discussing the findings of the environmental screening will be sent separately. The five borings in trig building area encountered shallow manmade fill and native clayey to sandy silts, and perched groundwater at multiple levels. In general, the subsurface conditions observed in the supplemes ital borings In the proposed building pad are consistent with conditions observed in previous subsurface explorations on the balance of the development area. AWe previous!y prepared a preliminary geotechnical engineering reporTainage, or this project that outlines our recommendations for she preparation, grading, foundation design, and other geotechnical concerns. Based on the additional subsurface explorations. it Is our opinion that the conclusions and recommendations provided in the preliminary report are applicable to the proposed building area. The following recommendations are supplemental to the preliminary geotechnical engineering report prepared for this project. 1-01 AGRA 40 Earth&Environmental Croup Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 21-6984.00 Proposed Tigard Costco August 11, 1993 Page 4 PIAN REVIEW AND GETECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION .OBSERVATION 'Ne have not reviewed final grading, wall, and foundation plans for this project. We recommend that we I,,e provided the opportunity fa do so In order to determine whether any change in design may have affected the validity of our recommendations. We also recommend that we be retained ). ;,":�cruction observation of stripping, grading, compaction, foundation excavations, and other soils related construction operations in order to correlate preliminary soil data with the actual soil r:onditions encountered during construction, ana to check for construction conformance to our report. We appreciate the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this Information, please contact the undersigned. RZA AGRA, Inc. GE"TIF/En IOREGON R.WARREN KRAGER E 951 R. Warren Krdger,C.E.G., S or Engineering Geologist �GINr Stuart Albright,P.E., Sen technical Engineer 1143, 9 ARtGOIV 2a A% I'AL AGRA Earth&Environmental Group Mulvanny-Lw,&Associates P.C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costcc, August 11, 1993 Page 2 $l1' PREPARATIQN .. Significant uncontrolled fills or other soil conditions detrimental to We proposed development were not encountered In the borngs. However, minor landscape or topsoil fill is present an a number of the existing lots. Underground utilities,floor slabs,foundations, and possibly basements are also present on the existing lots. As discussed in our preliminary geotechnical engineering report, we recommend complete rem ,vai of non-engineered fills and previous improvements and backfilling the resulting excavations with compacted crus'ned rock. After stripping and removal of previous improvements, we should be retained to observe the prepared subgrade. REIAININ WALL BAQKFILL AND DRAINAGE - Significant groundwater was encountered at :depths ranging from ten to 20 feet below the grnund surface in the two northern borings, B-1 and B-2. It Is expected that significant water will be encountered In the proposed ret;ining wall cuts on the perimeter of the development area, and possibly in floor slab or pavement subgrades. Adequate retaining wall drainage will be required to prevent excesstve wal! pressures from developing. Backfill behind retaining walls sho;tld consist of free-draining granular material. To minimize pressures on retaining walls, we recommend the use of crushed rock backfill (rcmforming to OSHD Standard Specification 703.08). Use of other material could Increase wall pressures. Overcornpaction of this fill can greatly Increase lateral soil pressures. We recommend that this fill be compacted to between 88% and 90% ralattve compaction (ASTM D-1557). In addition, we recommend that all fill within about five feet of retaining walls, be compacted with lightweight, hand-operated equipment. The following figure illustrates recommended r4taining wall backfill and drainage details. F /Wall Drain Materiel Such as MiradrF;n �- SAND BACKFILL ----_� NATN[SOLI_ — -� I Pea Gravel Approved Non-woven Filter Fabric __ Perforated PVC Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 2143W-00 Pvoposed Tigard Costco ,4upust 11, 1933 Page 3 ,SUBSURFA(E DRAINAGE - During site contouring positive surface drainage should be maintained away from all building foundations. A one to two porcent slope away from the building pad s:iould be sufficient to control surface water. However, in cut areas seeps of groundwater may appear on surface grades, and these areas should he provided with drainage. For this project we recommend exc,+vating a cut-off trench In the subgrade and installing a perforated drainage pipe within an envelop of free draining gravel. Drainage details should be provided on a case by case basis. Failure to install adequate drainage may result in premature pavement or floor slab tailurp. Porimeter foundation drains are recommended around all exterior footings at, or slightly below, the base et watior.of the footings. If finished floor elevations are below adjacent exterior grades,or If seeps or springs appew on the building subgrade, we recommend underslab drains in addition to the foundation perimeter drains. All subsurface drains should be protected by a filter fabric to prevent Internal soil erosion and potential clogging. All subsurface drainage systems should be sloped to drair by gravity to a stooTn sewer or other positive outlet. Water from down spouts and surface water should be Independently colleclw4J and routed to a storm sewer. Surface water must not be allowed to enter the subsurface drainage system. The following figure Illustrates typical foundation perimeter and underslab dta!nage detalis. 41nch Diameter t5 feat,TV Perforated P'V Approved Non woven `---- Impermeable Membrane Fitter Fabric open Graded(`,rushed -- Poch R. HANS GRUNBAUM I 1 , , I , i - MR. & MRS.. FRANK I W SCHREINER n 11780 1 u B-3 -- Q -- - - APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF I HEATING OIL i rn U.S.T. i------------ - - - ------- I , I I LEGEND j Qp 1TEMPORARY a-5 ENVIRONMENTAL 134 \ MONI ORI- G 1 ! WELL LOCATION B-4 I 11935 1', GEOTECHNICALSOIL --- - - L..-- --- ----- -L --- - - BORING LOCATION , 120 60 0 120 240FT SCALE 1"-120' PLATE 1 R ZA AG R A, Inc. W-O• 1060"-M SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOCATIONS F�.R�rf,Rfl4enaR.+r ++a Awa�.w�+C) DESIGN D-S.R. PROPOSED COSTCO STORE Wo 6 9N INMNEMTAI SUNCES DRAWN W.R.N./ML` HIGHWAY 217 ANLL HIGHWAY 99 7.97&W RdnCfi*W J w DATE 9/1010 TIGARD,OREGON A,rwait Dvo-rrm NOTED Ph.m Ix maim fix M Q2T-SRM l SCALE THE3E ORAYaW4 AM THE P"OMf Y OF RZA ARRA C2W&.iTANTS Aro AIE„OT GAD Flt NAME. -F PLAN TO BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WTHOUrT THE WRRTT EN CONSENT M RIA AGM_ PROJECT: COSTCO -TIGARD START CARD No.: N I A BORING No.: B-1 Elevation Reference: N/A Well Complete-d: N/A Lo, Mallhod: HSA N ,ioundwater Surface Elevation: NIA Rehrtiw:Ghsing Elevation: N/A Boreho4e Diarneier- «` 9Wr J M Depth .9 a� !g -0 z (feet) SOIL DESCRIP710N a$ E ; C s AS-tUILT DESIGN n` ar►'' to U 0 m o` D to CRUSHED ROCK ddy" 1711 LEL/ r ;,. ppm N N v N .V N N iv ni N N NNW. Stiff,moh;it,firm mottled,gmy N N S-5• 5 brown Sit.I. NN 11 30 N N air - iZYn1 Nell Point re. oved and _N M1 N boring backfilled �N with bentonite 10 Very stiff,moist to wet,rust N 16 30 mottled,gray micaceous SILT with trace day,foie sand and weathered basallk gravel. NNN w 9020 NNN rt N N NNN N N _15, \2"'Die.Sch.40 1 S-- Very stiff,moist,nrA mottled, ;N,v 17 30 Temporary PVC gray SILT,with trace of fine ,y v Wap Point :and. n7ni _ N N NNN NN NN NN 20- — y( 26 60 VVf? •.�2. _y, Very gtlff,wet to eehreted,nast- ,- brown fine SAND with some sk 2"Die.!loft.40 .020 Slot PVC Nom. Well sere" r✓,v Very stiff,moK rust mottled Nar pray SILT with trace day and r -25' 25 fine sand. �,'N 19 3o in TOTAL DEPTH 26.5 FEET LEGEND RZA AGRA JOB Nn. IrtG984-02 24nch O.D. COSTCO--TIGARED split-spoon sarnplen Groundwater Analysis with%recovered l l (SaMNI„N- Il,own) Highway 217&Highway 99 Tigard, Oregon _T_. Errc*rnt+xed groundwater level S Wo While drilling Bois oil Analysis RZA AGRA, Inc. A2401 (Test Method Shown) ENGINEERINO&ENVRONMENTAL SERVICES �- Measured static 7477 SW Tech Center(hive SW gnamdwater level Portland,Oregon 972.23-8024 Phone(503)539-3400 Drilling Started:N i A"– Drilling Completed: N I A Lop By D.S.R. �– PROJECT: COSTCO-TIGARD START CARD No.: N I A_ BORING No,: B-2 Elevatitm Reference: N I A Wed ComplelM- N f A Bo Method: HSA N Groundy.ater Surface Elevation: NIA Relative Cosing Elevation: NIA Borehole Diameter. 4" y J �— M . Depth 1 � i s � ^T z (feet) SOIL DESCRIPTION �•g w$ Q AS-81.01DESIGN 'Q 102 anti M o °- mss`. Orr,p►�r,CRUSHED ROCK�d►hrewaLr filly 'y LEIJ N PPm /V N N/N N N n/ N' N ti /V M A/N Medium stiff,moist,black mottled,gray- N N S-6' 5 -- brown SILT,with trace clay. .v../ b 60 _ ZI1, 8CIb N N ,,, 'Wel!Point N removed and N rV N/N boring taacaflllet; �✓ with bentonite 10 Stili,moist,lightly ntst mottled, J N --10' 14 20 V.ay,micaceolus SILT,with trace N NN^r. day,and rounded coarse t=end. /N V/i 8020 ,V N N N N 1b— 1�101-111 -16 2' .Suh.40 Very stiff,moist rust mottled. WL PVC black end gray,fee raWj Rll_T, ANN Wen Polrtt with trace of day. N n N rV WD ._ >tlff,saturated,nust mottled,gray, ;�'„? — Bois fine sandy SILT,with very thirty nM. - bedded sand. %�'�/ _ 2"Cie.8ctL 40 ^/:v .020 slot PVC Wen acre" nn N/V Very stiff,moist,lightty rust mottled, ]$� gray SILT with some day and trace of J b W,sand N 20 60 N N TOTAL DEPTH 26.5 FEET ,o. LEGEND RZA AGRA JOB No. 106984-02 24nrh O.D. COSTCO-TIGARD split-spo,on sna ample Groundwater Alysis with%recovered (Sammi No.Sttown) Highway 217&Highway 99 � Tigard, Orogon 7 Encountered groundwater level WD W ile drilling 8016 R�M'ah�s shy► Rr.A AGRA Inc. 8240 ENGINEERING RrENVRONMENTAL SERVICES - Measured ttaik 7477 SW Tech Cerner Drive SW groundwater level Portland,Oregon 87223-6024 Phone(503)638-3400 --Drilling Started: Drilling Completed: Logged By D.S.R. Boring B-3 - - ----- - - --1F STANDARD O 4 � PENETRATION RESISTANCE Hollow Stem Auger -j n (u a, S j d A Brows per f001(10 m.hWV"vrn0-drop)) Uj Iij CL O SOIL DESCRIPTION W a c7 O as 10 20 30 40 ------Dry.-gray.CRUSHED RO'.-K-(ddveway-_filat-;' I TMTHT-H ' _ Stiff,moist, dark brown, ELL ; micaceous SILT with trace '' a' organic fragments(native fill). Stiff,moist, black mottled, A ~ brown, micaceous SILT with trace clay, and widely scattered ° basaltic gravel ,y, t 10-Medium stiff,wet, black mottled, _ brown, micaceous SILT with trace �o Gay and fine sand. a� #1 a' - 1 Very stiff, moist,lightly rust mottled, b own, micaceous SILT. �r with Pace of day and fine sand. y a b 2 Very stiff,moist, brown and blueLI - grey SILT,with some clay,and a .r _ trace of weathered coarse sand. O A' A „Y. 5 Very stiff, moist, dark gray,clayey ;y SILT. a ---To L i1E 'TH 26._9TFFT -._ ---- ---- -- -- - - --- RZA AGRA JOB No. 106984-02 COSTCO -TIGARD LLGFi,..r Eighway 217 8r Highway 99 2.0"O.U.split spoon sampler Fr Sampler pushed I ward, Ore,jon 3.0"O.n,undisturbed sampler • %moisture content [XI 3.0"Lu.Universal sampler Sample not recovered --- r,1 3.0"I.U.Ring sampler Water level fluctuation R2A AGRA, Inc. G Grab S:.onpie interval 'v' Static water level ENGINEERING&ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES i Ir M I aho�atoryfchemleal analysis Piezometer tip 7477 S.W. Tech Center Drive Portland,Oregon 97223 Phone(503)639-3400 Fax(503)620-7892 Boring B-4 Lu Y STANDARD • PENETRATION Hollow • ' • SOIL DESCRIPTION• • • 1 Sod midi� =■-so Buono"iiiago � [MEN ■■■ �■■C■ brownoss Stiff,damp, ■■■onEmmons m■mmmp■nom■■ .■■ n■■m■■■m organicSILT with trace mossos■■o■s■V ■000■ (native fil;) lonasnss■o■n■■tiss■n■sn a� gnome_ �_ soon ■mm■�■oun�■msmmmm brown,Stiff,moist mso oor�■■■1�■■■ ■unn non SILT with trace fine sand I'm I an 5 I op :� . I11§1Von Room C■�.■.. mottled,Very stiff,wet, lightly rust m■■III■1I��so�on monsoon brown, mcaceotis SILT with some Hogomain , Employs fine sand' Boomoil l:lCEmilliS Bill Hill Nove■ l among ■�■ i'■ ■ ■■n o ■■■l■m on Very stiff, moist, dark gray,clayeymottled, brown, micaceous SILT, Monso on so tomo■_ ■■ ■�■■�■_■■ SILT with trace of coarse sand. no I Is 0 a loss IF.10 0 1 11 1 on = ■■n ►`�long■ ■s■iii■■ C.son m m11is■ons■■ ■■■n o 901 0000000110 Very stiff, moist,dark gray, clayey SILT. Be 11 1110111111 on0�.■■_■ ■■■ Q .■ ommon oo■■■ :':C so ling� ■ iiiEi' Very stiff, oist,lightly rust mottled,dark gray and blue gray,clayey SILT. TOTAL i'i"I I on long a on■n EN m an Ban u • : No. 106984-02 LEGEND COSTCO -TIGARD Highway 217 & Highway 99 2.0" • • split spoon sampler . • • • 3.0"O.D. sampler %moisture content 1 I.D. 3.0-I.D. ENVIRONMENTALG Grab sample Interval Static water level ENGINEERING& UCHEM M Drive . Portland,Oregon Phone •• Fax • 620-7892 V . 1 1 1 1 SW and silty Damp,brown andTOPSOIL_—__ NN CCC C'■CC ■NN scatteredwidely .(native fill). , fragmentsC: in CC NC. Zhelbyrooll ;Cmian ■ Stiff,moist, . . ■ ■n ■ ��C/�mr� C�C� � III SILT with trace Uay and fine sand. ION. /■, ; RJR 0Shelby Tube pushed 12" now I... brown, ■ ' CC oiMoist, lightly black mottled, grqy and mol 01 on l ■;i ■omNI ■ s ■■■ ■■■ N;:CCNNC CCN CN:CCN=; BONN an NONSENSE Very stiff,mcist,dark with some cl�Y. gray SILT 'iC'CCi1Ci�iCiCCinC n■■■N■/N■ r■■ ■/■■■/■ 0 son OEM 1C0 CCC:CC: i vivo s'%% :C �:C000: ■■■■/■■■N■■ ■ ■■■/■■. on BONNCCNC: C NN CNNeN Very stiff, moist,dark gray and brown, /■■■■■■■■■■■ ..n loss cjayey SILT with a trace of coarse sand. mans■/■■■■/■ ; .; TOTAL DEPTH 21.5 FEET Bongos C=iii=ii■"N■■ ■/. ■■■■■.■■1■■■■■■C•■111man ■■ on somom 'N' mama■■■ ■ ■■■ ■■■C■ on on /N■■son ■/■■/// ■■/■ C■■■■N;■■■ sellingN:/■■■ ii=iCENOC aCanSOON onC CCICNICCCCSCCC�IC 1 signs 01C1■CC 'C11CC3 ■• . . � s ENVIRONMENTALENGINEERING& DriveS.W.Tech Center Portland, :.. Phone(503) 11 1 1 i r LEVEL II SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION PROPOSED COSTCO SITE SW 79TI-I AVENUE. AND HWY 99 TIGARD, OREGON PREPARED FOR: COSTCO, INC. 10-6984-01, Copyright 1993 by RZA AGRA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. AUGUST 1993 RZA AGRA►, Inc. & AGRA Engineering & Environmental Services Earth & E:wironmental Croup RZA A C R A Inc 7477 SW Tech Center Drive • Portland, Oregon 97223-8024 (Formerly; Rittenhouse-Zeman&Associates, Inc.) (503)639-3400 Engineering & En vironmen tat' Services FAX(503) G'0-7892 August 16, 1993 1O�OOA4-0t Costco, Inc. c/o Mulvany Lee 12200 Northrup Way Bellevue,WA 98005 Attn: Kelly McBride SUBJECT: LEVEL If SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION PROPOSED COSTCO SITE SW 79th AVENUE AND HIGHWAY 99 TIGARD, OREGON Dear Mr. Mcbride Enclosed Is our report that summarizes the results of ou, Level II Subsurface investigation for the above referenced project. As noted In RZA AGRA's Level i Environmental Site Assessment indicated that the Chevron service station located on the north side of Highway 99 across from the proposed Costco store site has had a gasoline release from previously decommissioned underground storage tanks. According to a Chevron consultant, the release may hav3 migrated off of the Chevron site and the extent of the release has not been defined. Based on this finding. a Level II Subsurface Investigation has been conducted. The scope of this 1 Investigation consisted of the drilling of. two, 25 foot borings, the collection of soil and grot dwater samples, and the analysis of selected samples to determine if the site has been Impacted by the identified release. The borings were advanced on a residential lot at 11665 SW 79t1 hvenue. This lot was deemed to have the greatest potential fcr impact from the identified release. No petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in the analyzed soil samples, and no benzene:, ethylbpnzene, toluene or xylene was detected In the analyzed groundwater samples. No further work regarding potential contamination from the Chevron service station is recommended at this time. Three additional borings were advanced on the south two-thirds of the site as part of a geotechnical study. During drilling of a geotechnical boring (B-3), an underground heating oil tank was identifled at 11750 SW 79th Avenue. It appears likely that there may be other heating ail USTs located on the site. Heating oil USTs on the site should be properly decommissioned if they are to no longer be used. Soil sampling of the tank cavity following decommissioning should help to reduce future liability issues. We are pleased to have been of service to you on this project. If yoti have any questions or desire further clarification,do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, RZA AGRA,Inc, ' David S. Robertson, Environmental Scientist I Gerard Koschal, P.G.,As IN latei t Earth&Environmental Group TABLE OF ONTENTS Page Number 1 INTRODUCTION 1 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION 1 Subsurface Conditions 2 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 ust of Appendices Appendix A Analytical Results Chain-of-Custody Form Appendix 8 Boring Logs t COSTCO, Inc. 10.6984-01 August 16, 1993 Pagel IlVTRODV4TION RZA AGRA, Inc. has conducted a Level II Subsurface Investigation at the proposed COSTCO store site, located at SW 79th Avenue south of Highway 99 In Tigard, Oregon. The exploration was conducted August 2, 1993, and sampling subsurface soils from two borings and groundwater from temporary well points placed within the borings. The two environmental borinc,s were drilled in conjunction with three geotechnical borings advanced on the southern portion of the site. Chemical analyses of selected soil and water samples were performed by RZA in order to check for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons In soil, and benzene,ethylbenzene,toluene and xylene (BETX) In groundwater. According to ODEQ files reviewed in RZA's Level I Environmental Site Assessment (May, 1993), the Chevron service station located north of the site on the opposite side of Highway 99 has had a documented gasoline release from previously decommissioned underground storage tanks at tho facility. The release is believed by a Chevron consultant to have migrated off of the service station site and the extent of the release has not been defined. vBased on the results of RZA's Level I Environmental Site Assessmeni, the purpose and scope of this Investigation was to collect and analyze soil and groundwater samples on the subject site to detefonlne If groundwater has been Impacted by the release and to provide a report summarizing our findings. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of COSTCO Incorporated, and Its lenders and agents, for specific application to the referenced scope of services In accordance with generally acceptEd environmental practices. No other warranty, expressed or Implied, is made. In the event that changes Ir. the nature, usage, or layout of the existing site and nearby properties are made, the conclusions contained In this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed or verified In writing. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION Our subsurface environmental exploration program consisted of advancing two borings (B-1 and B-2) on a residential lot located at 11665 SW 79th Avenue. This lot was considered to have the highest potential for Impact from the Chevron sem ice station and is located In the northwest corner of the proposed store 1 site. The field work for this investigation was conducted on August 2, 1993 and was drilled 'n conjunction with three additi mal geotechnical borings (B-3, B-4 and B-5) advanced further south on the site. 1 COSTCO, Inc. 10-6984-01 August 16, 4.993 Page 2 The two environmental borings were advanced to a depth of 25 feet. Both of the environmental borings were backfilled with be.itonite and hydrated prior to leavinf the site Boring locations are shown on Plate 1. Soll samples were classified in the field by a geologist from RZA. Samples were collected using a two- Inch diameter split-spoon sampler. The sampler was decontaminated between sampling events. Representative portions of each sample were collected, and placed In alr-tight, teflon-sealed rontalners. All soil samples were screened for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons using a combustible gas meter(Gastech model #1,314). Groundwater samples were collected from well points Inserted into each of the borings. The well point consisted of a two-inch diameter PVC riser connected to a two-Inch diameter PVC well screen. Three well point water volumes were purged from each well point prior to groundwater sampling. Each sample was placed In an alr-tigt.t,teflon-sealed container. All soil and groundwater samples were transported on Ice to RZA's in-house laboratory (Portland, Oregon)for quantitative analyses. Quantitative analytical results are discussed below and, with chaln-of- custody records, may be found ir.Appendix A. ubsurfage Conditions Subsurface conditions were similar in both boring B-1 and B-2.. Except for an approximately six-inch thick layer of crushed rock used for driveway fill,the entire length of the boring consisted of medium stiff to very stiff, brown to gray, silt and fine sand considered to belong to the Willamette Silt Formation. This formation was deposited In slack-water following catastrophic Plellstocene flooding events. The native slit layer in both borings graded from no fine sand In the upper five feet to approximately 10 percent fine sand at 15 feet in boring B-1 and approximately 20 percent fine sand at 15 feet in B-2. At a depth of 20 feet in boring B-1, a two to three foot thick layer of fine sand was encountered, and finely bedded sandy silt and fine sand were observed in B-2. This sandy zone within the Willamette Silts contains a signfficpnt quantity of perched or semi-confined groundwater. An Increase in ^lay sized particles and a decrease in fine sand was notr,,d in the silt beneath the sandy zone at a depth of approximately 25 feet. 00STC0, Inc. 10-6984-01 August 16, 1993 Page 3 Groundwater was encountered in both of the borings at a depth of approximately 20 feet while drilling. Following Insertion of the well points the water levels rose to approximately 12 feet below the ex;stin�; ground surface. Groundwater on this portion of the site appears to be confined or semi-confined whhin a two to three foot thick layer of fine sand seams located at a depth of approximately 15 to 20 feet. It should be noted that groundwater was not encountered in the geotechnical borings advanced on the topographically lower, southern two-thirds of the site. No visual or olfactory evidence of contamination was noted In the two environmental borings or the three geotechnica! borings. Environmental and geotechnical boring logs are located in Appendix B at the back of this report. lLdergraund Storage Tanks (USTs) During drilling of a geotechnical boring (B-3) at 11750 SW 79th Avenue we noted the presence of an underground heating oil tank. Tho heating oil UST is located u;.,tside the southeast corner of the existing residence, and is actively used as part of the heating system for the residence. We were unable to drill near the UST due to access constraints. QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES Laboratory analyses for this project were conducted at RZA's in-house laboratory In Portland, Oregon. Soil samples were identified by the boring number and by the successively recorded sample number corresponding to depth (B#-S#). Groundwater samples were Identified by the boring number followed by a"vol'. Selected soil samples were tested for the idantification and quantification of fuel hydrocarbons by EPA method 8015-Modified. All groundwater samples were analyzeu for volati!3 organic compounds using EPA method 8020. All laboratory analytical results are Included in Appendix A. Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results Fuel Hydrocarbons (EPA 8015-Modified) - This analytical methnd uses gas chromatography to Identify 1 and quantify petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. Soil samples B-2-5 and B-2-20 were analyzed for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons. Pptrole.UrTI hydrocarbon contamination was not detected In either of the analyzed samples. COSTCO, Inc. 10-6984-01 August 16, 1993 Page 4 Summary of Groundwater Sample I alylical Results Aromatic Volatile Organic Compounds -BTEX (EPA Method 8020) -One groundwater sample from each well was analyzed for the presence c` benzene, ,IhylLenzene. toluene and xylene which are the constituents of gasoline. No BTEX cemp�-unds were detected in the analyzed water samples- _Q_QNCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RZA AGRA, Inc. (RZA) has conducted a level II subsurface investigation at the proposed COSTCO store sitb, located at SW 79th Avenue south of Highway 99 in Tigard, Oregon. The scope of this investigation consisted of collection of soil and groundwater samples from two, 25 toot deep borings and analysis of selected samples to determine if the site has been impacted by the identified release. The borings were advanced on a residential lot at 19665 SW 79th Avenue. This lot was deemed to have the highest potential for Impart from the identified release. No petroleum hydrocarbon contamination was detected in the analyzed soil and groundwater samples. No further work regarding the potential for irnpect from the Chevron service station is recommended at this time. Three additional borings were advanced on the south two-thirds of the site as part of a geotechnical study. During drilling of a geotechnical boring (B-3), an underground heating oil tank-vas rioted adjacent to the residence at 11750 SW 79th Avenue. It is our understanding that the existing residences will be demolished as part of redevelopment. Underground heating oil tanks located on the site should be properly decommissioned if they are not to be used in the future. Sampling of soils within the tank cavity following decommissioning should help decrease future liability Issues. We are pleased to have been of service to you on this proje%t. If you have any questions or desire further clarification,do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. RZA AGRA, Inc. David S. Robertson, Environmental Scientist I Gerard Koschal, P.G., Associate Geologist 1 /ZB-1 B-2. 0 ' 1 X665 ---------- ---- — I I -- ----------- I , j w Z ■! 1 1750 -'- - - '-"- ¢ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF i HEATING OIL U.S.T. 1 , I , ------------ I , I � LEGEND TEMPORARY ' *d-5 ENVIRONMENTAL i 4 1 MONITORING I ! WELL LOCATION Q4 11935 - GEOTECHNICAL SOII- - BORING LOCATION ' 120 60 0 120 240FT SCALE: 1"-120' PLATE 1 RZA AGRA, Inc. wo. — SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOCATIONS ' rjbpm Z w�&�,jAw.bo DESIGN D S H PROPOSED COST-,0 STORE HMS RING 6 ElMRONMENtAl.6FRVICF7i �iAWN W,R.l1./ML H(GHWo. 217 AND IfIGHWAY 99 7,07 SN rsan Cmbr I1rtn+ DATE 8/10190 TIGARD,OREGON Aww"d.a> m rpm-mm SCALE NOTED pb"mx oxiw Fti Il 0Qd47w 1 THOSE DRAW!Nry ARE THE PROF ERT OF fLU AGRA OCWMXIANTS AND ARF N07 CAD FILE HANE. SIIEP.LAH TO BE REPROWCED IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF AZA AGRA. 1 ' Appendix A 1 Analytical Results ' Chain-of-Custody Form r r t s I Pay" SltMFj ttotlaalaa N w O kn uolluaadaid aldweg M - uauieluo;l to / (� ti Cod t V a _ a0;1 Sa.L 301 XOJ, u MS 13adNeN3Ne3 t 4 ryl a N-CNN ':ON-N ZON/CO u u r Y Q (/] JOIr-J tIIV Puo3 NA I y� t� a — t- OLZ9 9Z9 Yd3 t0 sptoy'1naN asel� a �' Q i �6ZB ►7.9 Vd3 sailla0 algeaJanrl O ue 3 slula„ X01-J3 z. C •Iag10 Yl' dal rfulaK mol I ( U a y 311 / I'AI► I'M Yd3 t•uogj000tpAp loalad loy A C i 0 0VO9 Yd3 M9 Yd3 �I IouagAoto rla-tidal/aluad Cf a V a luudta8uU 10 % N ul tuI � z � r~ Q F spudwo3 U91.10 alllaloA I g w-51 w-209 Yd3 m Q m HdJ/uPug l2fm I C e 09 tld3 Ua o luv vda r fn p ►� salnelnn paiou2301eH O op Q o a 'CIS k o 1 w z z v, a t a n W o � U ce, �. 1 LU c; N d z a vSrK fW Q Z v1 > J A 1y ( a cwi =i wj a U A.L to 1 7477 SW Tech Center Drive A AGRA, Inc. Portland, Oregon 97223-8024 (Formerly:Rittenhouse-Zeman&Associates, Inc.) (503) 639-'400 Engineering& Environmental Services FAX (503)620-7892 Client: rostco-Tigard Service Raquest No.: OR930077 Project No.. G984-02 Report Date: 8/19/93 Project Manager: Dave Robertson Report No.: 4895 Sample Matrix: Soil C.U.C. No.: 2215 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC EPA Method 8015 Modified mg/kg (ppm) B-2-5 13-2-5 lab Sample dame: B-2-5 Duplicate Spike* %Spike B-2 4 Blank Detection Lab Code: 0077-3 0077-3d 0077-3s Recovery 0077-4 08-11sbk limit (C4-(;10) Gasoline Range -10.0 <10.0 111 111 <10.0 <10.0 10.0 (C t i-C24) Dlenel Range <25.0 <25.0 105 105 <25.0 <25.0 25.0 (C25-C35) Heavy Oil Range <200 <200 <200 - <200 <200 200 Snrrmple Date: 8/2 8/2 8/2 6/2 - Analysis Date: V/16 8/16 8/16 8/16 8/16 Control Surrogate Recovery: Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl: 93.8% 108% 122% 12.4% 102% 50%-150% a,a,a-Trtluorotoluene: 91.5% 92.9% 133% 102% 89.3% 50%-150% *Spiked with IGO ppm gasoline and diesel. gnature of Chen st Laboratory Manager ON AGRA ' 4w Earth&Environmental Group 7477 SW Tech Center Drive A AG RA, Inc. Portland, Oregon 97223-8024 (Formerly: Rittenhouse-Zeman&Associates, Inc.) (503) 639-3400 Engineering & Environmental Services FAX (503) 620-7892 Cli_ . Costco-I lgard Service Request No.: OR930077 Project No.: 6984-02 Report Date: 8/10/93 Project Manager: Dave Robertson Report No.: 4879 Sample Matrix: Water C.U.C. No.: 2215 BETX Compounds EPA Method 602 ug/1 (ppb) Sample Name: Lab Blank B-1W B-2W Detection Lab Cede: _ 08-04mb.3 0077-1 9077-2 i Limit Benzene nd nd nd 2.00 Ethylben7epa nd iod nd 2.00 Toluene nd nd nd 4.00 m/p-Xylene nd nd nd 2.00 o-Xylene • nd rxJ nd 2.00 Sample Datr;: - 8/2 8/2 Analysis Date: 8/4 8/4 R/4 Control Surrogate Recovery: Limits a,e,a-Tritluorotoluene: 92.6% 99.8% 97.5% 51.4%-133% / 1 ure of Chemist Laboratory Manager C w 1 L, AGRA Earth&Environmental Group t e 0 r i ROJFCT: COSTCO-71GAP.D S_TA_RT t:.ARD No : N/A 30RING No.: P-1 Ievation Reference: NIA Well Completed: NIA – – Boring Method: HSA v7 Gmundwa'er Surface Elevation: NIA Relative Casing Elevation: N i A Boretwle Diameter: 4" Y pth `� a t) SOIL DESCRIPTION q s3 0 P ' AS-Still7 DESIGN NF- 07U o - Dry.qrq CRUSHED RACK(dNtteway till) /LFu - _.. ,.. /V N vNNN NNN NNN NNN NNN Stiff,mo;c',;,.,u mottled,gray- brown SILT. ^N^/ ._� 11 :30 r�iv NN ^N/ Well Point Nom, removed and boring backfilled with hentonite Very stiff,moist to viet,rust ,'N^/ _ 16 30 mottled,gray micaceous SILT with trace clay,fine sand and NN weathered basaltic gravel vN N N / N� 9W 8020 N n/ "VIVIVII NNN NNN ^-16' Y"Din.Sch.40 Very shit,moist,rust rnoltled, NNN 17 30 7emporary PVC qray SILT,wth h'ace of fine NNN Well Polrrt KHnd NNN ___ NNN nyN vNN N/yN N N -20• - _ 26 60 WD Very stiff,wet to saturated,ruat- brown fine SAND with some silt. 2"DIA.Sch.40 .021'Slot PVC /"NN — Well Screen NNN Very stiff,moist,rust molded �. grey SILT with trace day and 6' fine sand. NN = 14 30 N� TOTAL DEPTH 26.5 FEET 30— — LEGEND RZA AGRA JOB No. 106984-02 24nch O.D. COSTCO ••TIGARD split-spoon sample Groundwater Analysis with%recovered (Sample No.Shown) Highway 217& Highway 99 Tigard, Oregon V Encountemd g oundwate,level Soil Analysis WD while drilling 8016 RZA AGRA, Inc. 4240 (Test Method 31x>wn) ENGINEERING&ENVRCNMENTAL SERVICES ® Measured static 7477 SW Tech Center Drive SW groundwnber level Portland,Oregon 97223-8024 Phone(503)639-3400 Drilling started: Drilling Compl,rted: N I LoggW By: D.S.R. OJECT: COSTCO -TIGARD _ STARI CARD No.: N/A BORING No.: 13-2 levation Reference: N I A Well Completed: N I A Boring Method: HSA to Gr„undwater Surface Elevation: NIA Relative Casing Elevation: N/A Borehole Diameter. 4" rwiJ N J Z P� SOIL DESCRIPTION b S _ AS-BUILT DESIGN < co Dry,gray,CRUSHED ROCK(driveway fill) LEU N pprn N N NNS, VNNN 'V Z NNN 'r/VNN _ Medium stiff,moist,black mottled,gray- brown SILT,with trace clay. n/ B 60 r „N N �eo1a N�N vN n/ /N N Well Point N N removed and NN boring backfilled N with bentonite /`J N N^'.. — SIM,moist,lightlyrustrust mottled, N 14 20 gray,micaceous SILT,with trace IV clay,and rounded coarse sand- Z '/NN 11J V N 1117 SW 8020 NNN NNN N 70 20 '2"Din.Sch 40 Very stiff,moist,rust mottled, �, Tem PVC block and gray,fine sandy SILT, N � N N Well Point with trace of day. NNN N N NNN /N NNN N _ n?'N 40, - 14 130--' --- NNN WC Stlff,saturated,rust mottled,gray, 'n?'N 801E One sandy SILT,with very thinly /lYN hedded sand. n?'N `2"Dist.Sch.40 NNn�N 020 Slot PVC IV N Well Screen NNN Very stiff,motet,lightly nJSt mottled, gray SILT with soma clay and trace 4M fine.%and. NNN 20 80 NNN NNN TOTAL DEPTH 28.5 FEE1 I 30-1 24nch O.D. LEGEND RZA AGRA JOB No. 106984-02 COSTCO -TIGARD split-spoon sample r Groundwater Analysis Highway with%recovered (`, (SeHighway No.Shown) Y 217& 99 Tigard,Oregon Encomftred groundwater level WD While drilla [lio16 Soil Analysisr7477 AGRA, Inc. 240 (Test Method StK wn) NEERING S ENVRONMENTAL SERVICES Measured stag SW Tech Center Drive SWgroundwater levelnd,Oregon 97223-A074 e(503)639-3400 Drilling started: N I A Drilling i5o­rnpl;—tedF N I A Logged By: D.S.R. + 1 Boring B-3 i STANDARD Hollow Stem Auger c W PENETRATION RESISTANCE WIAj1J n Z d ♦ maws per root(140 m.hwr.rxv1ao-drop) O SOIL DESCRIPTION a c� c�7 m 10 20 30 40 Dry, gray. CRUSHED 9OCK(oldveway ) Stiff, moist, dark brown, a micaceous SILT with trace organic fragments(native fill). a , Stiff, moist, black mottled, o - - ---- ----- ___ brown, micaceous SILT with trace �a clay, and widely scattered basaltic gravel a^ ,a - 1 ,o• Medium stiff,wet, black mottled, A brown, micaceous SILT with trace �r : : clay and fine sand. „r• ,a 1. •O Very stiff, moist, lightly rust J11 mottled, brown, micaceouz SILT, ' with trace of clay and fine s,md. a - Very stiff moist, brown and blue grey SII •with some clay, and a trace of t✓eathered coarse sand. A a: x Very stiff, moist, dark gray, clayey TO�AI_DEPTH 26.5 FEET ni RZA AGRA JOB No. 106984-02 COSTCO -TIGARD LEGEND Highway 217 8r Highway 99 I- 2.0"O.D.split spoon sampler P Sampler pushed Tigard, Oregon II 3.0"O.D.undisturbed sampler • %moisture content (� 3.0"I.D.Universal sampler Sample riot recovered 3.0"I.D.Ring sampler Water level fluctuation RZA AGRA, Inc. G Grab sample Interval Static water level ENGINEERING&ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ' L/CHEM Laboratory/chemical analysis Piezometer tip 7477 S.W.Tech Center Drive Portland,Oregon 97223 Phone(503)639-3400 F,nx(.503)620-7892 1 BoringB-d �! STANDARD aC PENETRATION RESISTANCE Hollow Stem Auger U o w Q. W I.._-__- d j Q Slows per r(roftW 1b.hwrrner130"drop) lilt Q O � ® ... SOIL DESCRIPTION or O N 10 20 30 40 Sod and silty TOPSOIL Stiff, damn, brown an.f gray, SILT with trace organ,c fragments Or - (native fill). ;a � I _ Stiff, moist, lxown, micaceous -- - -- Sli T with trace fine sand "r ,a x ,a a ,a Very stiff,wet, lightly rust mottled, - __ brown, micaceous SILT with some A I a fine snoid. rr ,a Very stiff, moist,dtek gray,clayoy mottled, brown, micaceous SILT, a +- 1 SILT with trace of coarse sand x Very stiff, moist,dark gray, clayey SILT. A x a 0 Very stiff, moist,lightly rust mottled, - 1 dark gray and blue gray,clayey SILT. _ a -- - - TOTAL DEPTH .5 FE —30 pRZA AGRA JOB No. 106984-02 LEGEND COSTCO - TIGARD Highway 217 8l Highway 99 2.0"O.D.split spoon sampler P Sampler pushed Tivard, Oregon IJ 3.0"O.D.undisturbed sampler • %moisture content [ 3.0"I.U.Universal sampler Sample not recovered ----- --- 3.0"I D.Ring sampler Water level fluctuation RZA AGRA, Inc. G Grab sample interval Static water level ENGINEERING&ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UCHEM Laboratory/chemical analysis Piezometer tip 74" S.W Tech Center Drive Portland, Oregon 97223 Phone(503)639 3,100 Fax (503)620-1892 1 Boring B-S -- — — U STANDARD O d PENETRATION RESISTANCE i lo!low Stem Auger v G w CL W I - ? d A Blows per Ioo(1401b.hwnmerf30'drop) 0 � SOIL DESCRIPTION � � � 10 20 30 40 Sod and silty I OPSOIL Damp,brown and gray SILT with widely scattered organic fragments �a (native fill) p Shelby Tube pl.ished 12" °y I A' Stiff, moist, brown, micaceous - __ SILT with trace clay and fine sand a' I ' a a a Shelby Tube pushed 12" ------ Moist, lightly bl ack mottled, gray and Q P brown,micaceous SILT with some clay �o ,a Very stiff, moist, dark gray SILT with some clay. ,a p' 0 ,a Very stiff, moist, dark gray and brown, P clayey SILT with a trace of coarse nand. - TOTAL DEPTH 21.5 FEET - ' RZA AGR A JOB No. 106984-02 COSTCO -TIGARD LEGEND Highway 217 8r Highway 99 2.0"O.D.split spoon sampler P Sampler pushed TigardOregon 3.0"O.D.undisturbed sampler • %moisture content (?Cf 3 0"I.D.Universal sampler Sample not recovered RZA AGRA, Inc. 1 ?.0"I.D.Ring sampler Water level fluctuation G Grab sample interval Static water level ENGINEERING&ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES I_!Ct It h4 I-phrimtoi-y/chemical analysis i Piezometer tip 7477 S.W. Tech Center Drive Portland,Oregon 97223 Phone(503)639-3400 Fax(503)620-7892 1 i i SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED COSTCO STORE TIGARD, OREGON 1 PREPARED FOR: MULVANNY-LEE & ASSOCIATES 21-6984-00 Copyright 1992 by RZA AGRA, Inc. All Rights deserved. JUNE, 1993 i RZA AGRA, Inc. 1 AGRA Engineering & Environmental Services Earth & Environmental Group R Z A AGR n c. 7417 SW Tech CentDrive i I Portland, Oregon 9722 23-8024 (Formerly: Rittenhouse-Zeman&Associates, Inc.) (503)639-3400 Engineering & Environmental Services FAX (5011"! 620-7892 June 18, 1993 21-6984-00 1 Mulvanny-Lee R Associates P.C. 12200 Northup Way Bellevue, WA 9885 Attn: Mr. Chandler Stever SUBJECT: SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED COSTCO STORE TIGARD, OREGON Dear Mr. Stever: Enclosed are 5 copies of our preliminary report documenting the results of our subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering study for the proposed Tigard Costco store. Based on our subsurface explorations and geotechnical analyses, it Is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed development, subject to our recommendations. However, during the course of our study the proposed building location was moved to the southwest corner of the site. This portion of the site is occupied by existing residences, and could not be Investigated during our site recon nal 3sarice and subsurface exploration. We recommend that further subsurface explorations be conducted In the proposed building area when site access Is permitted. The native, non-organic silt underlying the topsoil is suitable for support of foundation loads up to 2,000 psf. geotechnical design and construction recommendations are discussed in Section 4.0 of the enclosed report. M We appreciate the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions regarding tht3 report, or require additional Information, please contact our office at(503)639-3400. Respectfully submitted, RZA AGRA, Inc. ' R. Warren Krager, P.G., SOnior Geologist Stuart Albright, P. E., Sert(or Q otechnical Engineer i AGRA ' Earth&Enotonmental Group TABLE_QF CONTENT ja Numbw 0.0 SUMMARY 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 2.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3 iy 2.1 Site Description 3 2.2 Proposers Project 4 3.0 SITE EXPLORATION AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4 3.1 Site Exploration 4 3.2 She Geology and fubsurface Conditions 5 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 6 4.1 She Preparation 6 4.1.1 Dry Weather Construction 7 4.1.2 Wet Weither Construction 7 4.2. Proof-rolling 8 4.3 Fills 9 4.4 Areal Settlements 9 4.5 Retaining Structures 10 4.5.1 Restrained Walls 10 4.5.2. Non-Restrained Walls 10 4.6 Foundations 11 4.7 Floor Slabs 11 4.8 Subsurface Drainage 12 4.9 Utility Excavations 13 4.10 Seismic Characterization 13 5.0 PAVEMENT DESiGN 13 6.0 FUTURE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES t6 e Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 21-6984 00 Proposed Tigard Costco .lune 16, 1993 Page 2 QO SUMMARY The portion of the site that we Investigated Is geotechnically suitable for the proposed construction subject to the recommendations provided herein. Key design Items are summarized below, and are discuss(d in greater detail in the following sections of this report. o Subsurface conditions In the proposed building area could not be investigated because occupied residences were present on the site. However, native soils on the eastern half of this site consist of a layer of topsoil underlain by medium stiff clayey silts to silts. N' ,oil conditions on the western half of the site are expec+ed to be similar. o The native, non-organic silts are suitable for foundation support of the proposed building ane pavements. For the type of building proposed, shallow spread footings bearing on undisturbcui native silts or structural fill may be designed for bearing pressures up to 2,000 psf. o Topsoil stripping depths are expected to be in the range of six to 12 Inches, but stripping Oepths up to 24 Inches may be necessary in some areas. o Thp native silty soils at this site are moisture sensitive and easily disturbed when wet. We re4ommend dry weather grading and site work. A granu!ar working blanket will probably be rie.•essary for wet weather construction. o Shallow perched groundwater conditions were observed during our subsurface investigation. Deep cuts may encounter perched groundwater. Positive site drainage and foundation perimeter drains are recommended for this site. o The native silts are suitable for euse as structural If used under controlled moisture conditions. Imported structural fill material may consist of any relatively well-graded soil that is free of debris and organic matter and that can be compacted to the following recommended levels (ASTM D- 1557): Granular F11, -95% Fine-gra;ned fill outside foundation areas-92% Top eigid Inches of pavement subgra6e-95% Retaining Wall Backfill -88-90% The preceding summary Is intended for Introductory and reference use only. De..igr, !could be baser)on the complete recommendations provided in this report. 1 Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 2.1.6984-00 Proposed'Tigard Costco ,lune 16, 1993 Page 3 1.0 INTRQDIlCTIQ19 This report presents the results of our surface and subsurfacw exploration and geotechnical engines I study for the proposed Costco store In Tigard, Oregon The location of the site and rroposed developmenr are shown on the attached site plan, Plate 1. The purpose of our study was to estat-Alsh surface atxi subsurface conditions at the site on which to i,ase our conclusions arxf recommendations regarding foundation aril pavement design, grading and construction related geotechn'.:al considerations pertaining to the proposed development. Our scope of work Included review of geologic ieports and literature for this area, surface f.nd subsurface explorations, laboratory testing, and geotechnical engineering analyses. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Costco, Mulvanny-Lee and Associates, W & H Pacific, and their agents, for specific application to this project In accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice. Written authorizatiop to proceed with this study was granted by Costco on May 4, 1993. SITE TE AND PFL04EC DD C19IPT1019 2.1 $it�_Det3cription TI ie project site Is located st the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Highway 217 and Pacific Highway (Hvvy 99W) In Tigard, Oregon. The west and north margins of the site are bounded by Highway 217 and Pacific Highway (Hwy 99W) right-of-ways, respectively. The east and south margins of the site are bounded by an undeveloped grassy parcel and a wetland scrub area, respectively. The proposed site consists of a. undeveloped grassy parcel on the east, and a 19 lot single-family residential tract on the west, which together total approxlmately 35 sores. 'The residential portion of the project site was occupied at the time of our field work, so detailed reconnaissance and/or subsurface explorations could not be conducted In this area. Our surface reconnaissance and subsurface explorations were limited to the eastern, grassy parcel which was vacant at the time of our subsurface exploration. The site slopes gently down to the south, dropping In elevation floin approximately El. 220 at the north to El. 170 near the southern property margin. Drainage Is generally to the southwest, toward Fanno Creek. An unnamed tributary of Faiino Creek flows along the east and south edge of the property. The southern margin of the site abuts a relatively flat, poorly drained area that contained some areas of standing water during our spring field work. The near-surface site soils consist of Soft, moist, slightly organic clayey silt 1 Muivanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 16, 199' Page 4 topsail underlain by silts of the Aloha soil series. The Aloha soil series develops on alluvial slits of the Willamette Silt Formation. 2_2 Frop-9-qg Prolect The proposed project, as we understand it, will consist of constructing a new retail store with CMU or metal walls, :,pread perimeter end column footings, and a ^oor slab on grade. It is our understanding that floor loads In the range of 350 psf and column loads of about 120 kips are anticipated. The finished floor elevation will t•e about El. 189.5. This will require a maximum cut of approximately 10 feet on the oorth side of the proposod building. Structural fid up to 18 faet In height may be rr_,-alred on the south portion of lite proposed uuliding pad. The south edge of 1 9 pruposed panting lot will also be filled approximately 14 to 28 f,-rt. We understand that most of the deop cuts and fills will be structurally retained. Retaining well h9lghts up to 28 feet are proposed. The project Involves cor. Iructlon of a truck loading dork and access drive at the r,mr of the building. Construction of she utilities, paved auto access drh,es, paved pa-king area, arxi minor landscaping are also proposed. �.0 SITE EXPLORATION AND SUi�$�NRFACE rONDiTI NS a.1_Sits ExglQr to Ion Out field n.;,ploration for this project was conducted during the week of May 10-14, 1cYj3, and consisted of gaol:,glc/geotechnical reconnaissance, and 13 backhoe excavated test pits. Our econnalssance and fsubsurface explorations were conducted in the undeveloped eastern portion of the she In tate proposed parking area. Vest pits or borings ware rot excavated In she residential portion of the site. Since the proposed bulldirg was relocated H In the residential portion of ,he b s, and subsurface explorations could not be conducted in this area, our geotechnical design recommendations pertaining to the proposed buliding should be conskiered preliminary. W3 strongly recommend that further subsurface explorations be conducted In the proposed building area when site access permission is gwnted. ■ The backhoe used for the subsurface exploration was a Case C-00 K, subcontracted to us by a local con•ractor. The subsurfdce explorations were approximately located by pacing from property corners and she features shown on preliminary site plans provided by W&H Pacific.. The location of the proposed development, and the approximate locations of ow, subsur.ace explorations are shown on the She Plan, Plate 1. 1 ra�ri Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 16, 1993 Page 5 Soil characteristics, test pit excavation conditions, and groundwater occurrences were logged in the field by a registered geologist tram our firm. Representative samples of the site soils were returned to our soils laboratory for further examination, classification,and testing. Descriptive logs of the subsurface explorations are Included in the appendix of this report. _�2 $its Geol49Y enolSub�u!face CQnditlotls Based on our office research and subsurface explorations, we have determined that the near-surface geology of the she consists of Late Pleistocene age deposits of silts with minor vF-ry fine-grained sands, and a!race of clay. This silt deposit is referred to In geologic literature as the Willamette Silt Formation, named by Allison in 1953. The Willamette Silt Formation is a slack water silt deposit resulting from repeated temporary Inundation of the Portland Basin and Willamette Valley by Pleistocene glacial outburst floods of the Columbia River. The last of these great floods, also thought to be one of i,-s largest, occurred about 12,400 years ago. Only minor erosion and deposition of alluvium, soil horlMi develo,)ment, and cultivation have modifiea the site soils since original deposition. The g3cloglc unit discussed above has h4en cultivated and weathered to form a surficial topsoil zone. The near-surface topsoll Is underlain by unweathered silty soils. The engineering properties of these soils Is discussed In more detail In the following sections: Organic Topsoil - The upper 6 Inches to two feet of the she soils consist of dark brown slightly organic topsoil that may have been cultivated a number of years ago. This layer generally consists of a soft, moist to wet,dark brown to black,organic slit to clayoy sift that Is not suitable for support of foundations, pavements, or for use as structural fill. Most of the organic topsoil Is confined to the upper 6-12 Inches, birt deeper topsoil is present on the flatter southern portion of the property. In this area organic topsoil up to two feet Is present_ Stripping depths In the range of 12 Inches are expected to remove most of the--oft, organic topsoil from the parkin; area. However, isolated areas of deeper stripping may be necessary, and we recommend that we be retained to evaluate the stripped subgrade. Topsoil stripping depths In the residential portion of the site are expected to be highly variable. Undisturbed Native Silt - Underlying the topsoil and disturbed near-surface silty soils cf the Aloha series, nwlve soils consist primarily of silt, with very tine-grained sand, and a trace of clay. Based on our test eycavations, the undlsturheri silt consistency varies from medium stiff to stiff. The relative soil moisture cwitent was damp to -racist at the time of our exploration. These sifts ere generally suitable for subgrade Mulvanny-Lee &Associates P.C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 16, 1993 Page f, S! suppor� 0 pavements and moderately loaded foundations if prepared in accordance with our �I recommendations (se,,� Section 4.0). The silts are moderately compressible, and proposed fill loads ,,re expected to result In areal settlements. Because the soils are moderately well drained we expect area' settlements to occur faint,, quickly upon loading (see Sect)on A.4). These gilts are also si ihable for Vqo as structural fill If placed and compacted near the optimum moisture content,which Is In the range of 14 to 16%. Molsture contents at the tirie of our subsurface Investigation were in the range of 2.0 to 25%. Close monitotmo of soil mois.ure cor!tent and compaction effort may be required ourinq site grading if native sr1Ils are used for structural fill. Tha fine-grained soils are very moisture and fr03t sensitive and are easily idisturbed,Nhen wet. We strongly recommend dry weather grading and construction at this site. Surface Runoff end Groundwater - A rock-lined drainage or storm runoff ditch has been constructed near the center of the she. N-)wever, it does,not appear that significant wa' r flows throe ugh this-titch. It appears 1 that most of the rain water that falls on the site percolates Inti Oie ground. Minor runoff in the form of sheet flow may Occur during periods of liaavy ami/or prolonged precipitation. Slight to moderate seepage of groundwater vias bserved In a few of the subsurface explorations on this site. Standing watar was present at the ground surface on the southern margin of the property. Based on the soil texture and Color observed in subsurface explorations It appears that most of the site soils are moderately well drained. It Is probable that the record rainfall of April, 1993, has resulted in developemnt rf minor zones of perched groundwater. Permanent grc,mdwater is expected to fluctuate near elevation IR, In the vicinity of this site. As a preeautkm against perched subsurface water accr,mulating under foundations or floor slabs we ommend foundation and floc,-slab elevations at or above existing grades,with subsurface drains Installed around all perimetof footings. 4A RECOMMENDATIONgA►i0 CON LUSIONS 4.1 Site Preparatlon Prior to beginning construction, all arA.as of the site that will receive structural fill, foundations, floor slabs, or pavements should be cleared of any previous improvements, stripped of organic topsoil, roots, and any non- engineered manmade fills, i.e.,and excavated to firm. non-organic, undisturoed nal -e soil or struct.lral fill. 1 as i Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 16, 1993 Page 7 Topsoil stripping depths are expected to vary from approximately six to 24 inches in depth over most of the site. Topsoil stripping depths in excess of Iwo feet m?y be necessary along the southern margin of the she. An average 12 Inch stripping depth will remove most of the organic topsoil in proposed parking and access drive areas. Depth of topsoil stripping and fill removal In the residential portion of the site are expected to vary substantially. We recommend that old foundations, utilities, and other existing site improvements be removed down to Linn native Lilts or engineered fill, and the resulting excavation should be backfilled with compacted crushed rock. Failure to adeq.jately abandon and backfill old foundations and wilrties may cause moisture to enter structural fills and under floor slabs, possibly leading to excessive settlr;n;ents or premature slab failure. AH;r removal of existing site improvements, and strippir,g of organic debris and topsoil, we recommend that the resulting exposed subgrale be observed by a representative from our office. Ally areas �4 soft or undesirable soil should be overexcavated down to firm non-organic silty soil. We have provkfed recommendations ic;r both :-jet weather and dry weather construction. However, due to the moisture sen,hive nature of the silts at this sop, we recommend that the site be prepared during dry weather to rvinlmize disturbance to the subgrade. If wet weather grading Is attempted, we anticipate that pumping and/or rutting of the subgrade will result, and these areas will require overexcavation and stablllza"on with granular material in accordance with Section 4.1.2. 4.1�Weatherr-- nstructlon - Seasonal wetting, drying, freezing, and thawing has loosened the near- surface silty soils. After topsail stripping and excavating to final graces, but before any new fill i,� installed, we recommend that all pavement and floor slab areas be scarified to a depth of ac least eight I .;i es. The scarhled sell should be moisture conditioned as necessary and compacted to at least 92% relathv to ASTM D-1 5F­ Fven during dry weather It Is possible that areas of subgrade will hecome soft or will pump. W or wet area; that cannot be effectively dried and compacted should he prepared In accordance with Sectior 4.1.2. Firm, undisturbed foundation subgrade in deep cut areas will not require scarifying and re<r,mpa& 41.1.2 Wgt_tYeather_ ' rI r gtfon - During wet weather or when adequate moisture control - rnot be maintained for the fine-grained soils, h may be necessary to Install a granular working h;ankk,,1 ) support construction equipment and provide a firm b,sr. -), which to place subsequent figs so'' pav;.ments. Commonly the working blanket consists of a bank run gravel or pit run quarry rock (ate: me o eight Inch t ' Mulvanrry-Lee&Asaociates P.C. 21-6P34-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 1r , 1993 Page 8 maxim,im sl:e w;th no more than 5% by weight passing a No. 200 sieve). We recomme..J that we be cor,.3L ted to approve the material before installation. The working blanket should be Installed on a stripped subgrade in a single lift, with trucks end-dumping off an advancing pad of granular fill. After Installation, the working blanket should be compacted by a minimum Aof four complete passes with a moderately heavy s!eel drum or grid roller. The working blanket must provide a firm base for subsequent fill Installation and compaction Ordinai working blanket of 12 to 18 Inches Is adequate, depending on the gradation and angularity of the granula. material. This assumes that thr material is placed on a relatively undisturbed subgrade in accordarrr ,*h the preceding recommendations, and that it is not sunjected to frequent heavy construction traffic Sect,wet areas er haul routes for heavy construction equipment may require a granular working blanket rik;knew of two feet or mere. If particularly soft areas are encountered, approved filter fabric Installed over the slit sr rgrade may be substituted for up to five or six Inches of working blanket thickness. Filter fabrics should h of a non-woven, non-degradable type. If desired,we car.provide you with sample specifications for this r,raterial. Construction practices can greatly affect the arnount of working blanket necessary. By using tracked equipmr and special haul joads, the working blanket area can be minimized. The routing of dump trucks and rut-ur)r-tired equipment across the site during wet weather may require extensive areas and thi.;knesses of we, .ng blanket. Normally the design, installation, and maintenance c, - -orking blanket Is made the resp osibllity of the contractor. 4, Progf-rolling ol.owinq subgrade preparation In accordance with the prev ous sections, and prior to fill placement, or base ccdrse Installation, we recommend that the subgrade be proof-rolled with a fully-loaded to to 12 yerd dump, truck. This pertains to all building 3 xi pavoment areas. Any areas that pumi,, weave or appear soft and muddy should be rverexcavated and backfi:led with compacted granular fill. If a significant length of time passes between completion of fill placement and commencement of constrn cfion operations, or if significant traffic has been routed across the site,we recommend that the site be similarly proof-rolled again before final placement of base rock, asphalt, or concrete is allowed. 1 Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.0 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 16, 1993 Page 9 w 4.3 Fills Any fills on this project should be installed on a subgrade that has been prepared In accordance with the recommendations In Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of this report. Fills should be installed in horizontal lifts not 1 exceeding about eight Inches in thickness, and should be compacted to at least 92% relative compaction for silty soils, and 95%for sands and gravels. l he top eight Inches of pavement subgrade should be compacted to 95% relative compaction. This criteria may be reduced to 85% in landscaping or planter areas. Compaction specifications are based oa the maximum dry density of the soil as obtained by the ASTM D- 1557 met!iod of compaction. During dry weather, structural fills may consist of virtually any relat'veiy well-graded soil that is free of debris and organic matter that can be compacted to the preceding specifications. The native silts (excluding topsoil/org•anlc soils) would generally be adequate for these fills H placed and compact(,] near the optimum moisture content of the soil. The optimum soil moisture contenc is approximately 15%, while the ci rent moisture content at the time of our exploration was as high as 25%. During dry summer weather a day or more of drying time may be needed for each eight Inch thick',Rt. Air-drying or adding water, with occasional mixing or discing may be required tr adequately moisture condition the site soils for use as structural fill. 4.4 Areal Settlements The deep areal fills proposed for this project will Increase the stresses In the existing soil strata, causing variable consolidation and settlement, even If the fills themselves are adequately compacted. Areal settlements resulting from the weight of newly installed fills on the southern margin of the building pad are expected to be in the range of four to six Inches. Since the proposed building will require both cuts and structural fills, significant differential settlement across !le Wilding pad Is anticipated. We recommend that settlement plates with extension rods be Installed on the n-ithre subgrade In deep fill areas. The rods should Oe survey,-d periodically during and after construction of the fillj to verify settlements. Construction of the proposed building shy, A proceed only after the rate of settlements decrease. It is our preliminary estimate that settlarrents will be f)o% complete by approximate!v 30 days atter completion of the fill. We point out, however, th,4 wet weather grading or poor filling techniques can prolong and/or Increase settlements. We Arecommend that we bt, contacted to review fill settlement data before construction of the proposed structure begins. AirVIF . Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 16, 1993 Page 10 4.5 ReUlning St r Ftures The tables presented in this sect,un summad, a our recommendations for design of retJning struOures. These values represent our best es ,mates of ang term pressures that will devolop in an active or at-rest state of stress. No factors of sar• v ire Included In these numbers. These values assume that retaining structures will be adequately drained by either!veep holes spaced no more than six feet on center or bq a perfcreted pipe subdraln installed in a pronely grad x1 filter material or wrapped in a filer ':ibrlc (also tee Soolon 4.13). Rotaining wall backfill should consist of relatively free straining granular soil lightly c:ompaJed, not In excess of 90% relative to ASTM D-1557. Overcompartion can greatly Incmase retaining wall pressures. .a tr InW I - Restrained walls are any walls that are prevented from rotation during backfilling. Most basement walls are restrained at the top by a floor and fall into the category of restrained walls. in addition, any retaining wails that are rigidly connnc!ed to buildings or that make sharp bends may fair into this category V ,-r icommend that rigid wail:,be designed for the pressures shown below. Ba"kfill Slope Equivalent Fluid Pressure FiQz �ertical Ibs•/cu• tl. Level 40 3HA V 80 211:1 V 100 These pressures represent our best estimatos of actual pressures that may develop and do not contain a factor of safety. 4.5.3 Non-Restrained Walls - Non-restrained walls have no restraint at the top and are free to rotate about their base. Lataral movement at the top may be up to 1J2w timc3 the wall height. Most cantilever retaining walls fall Into tills category. We recornmend that ron-restrained walls be designed for the pressures shown In the following tab!e. Backfill Sloe F uivalent Fluid Pressure r g .ue I1aft ntalJVertical lbs-Icu. ft. Level 30 3HAV 50 2HA V 60 Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 16, 1993 Pago t t These pressures represent our best estimate of i,Ctual pressures that may develop and do riot contain a factor of safety. 4.6_EQyndations The medium stiff to stiff undisturbed nitive slits and structural fill are suitable for support of light to moderate foundation loads. We recommend khat an allowable net bearing pressure of 2,000 psf be used for column and perimeter footings. This all;,wntAe bearing pressure assumes that foundations are a -nInimum of 12 Inches wide and are a minimt[rn of 10 Inches below lowest adjacent exterior grade. This bearing pressaTe may be Increased by one-third for short term loading such as wind or seismic forces. For dead loads less than or equal to 120 kips for columns, and in the -ange of 4-6 kips/ft for continttois footings we do not expect total foundation settlements to exceed one Ir-h, and differential settlement:; to exceed one-half Inch. Rapid settlement of foundations are expected, with nearly all of the settlement to be complete by the end of construction. For passive pressures In resistance to lateral loads a 350 pcf equivalent fluid weight may be used f). the Or soils, excluding soil within otie foot of the surface where no passive resistance should be used in lesi.4" unless confined at tile,surface by pavement. A base friction equal to 40% of the vertical load may be used at the base of foundations as sliding resistance. If foundations are ox;avated during wet weather it may be necessary to install a thin layer of crushed rock or lean concrete In focting bottoms to minimize subgrade disturbance during placement of fomis and •einforceruent steel. 4,7 FI�W Slabs FI-orslabs on grade should be prepared In accordance with Section 4. , Site Preparaqon. We recommend that- any floor lab areas be proof-rolled with a fully loaded dump truck. Any areas that pump, weave, or app Sar soft or muddy should be overexcavated and stabilized with compacted granular fill. Floor slab deli,Yn thickness will be controlled by the subgrade soils In the building area, For recomoac`ed slit subgrade at th ; site we recommend iv ,g a modulus of subgrade reaction of 200 psi/in. A minimum six-Inch think i compacted crushed rr ;b 1,n ar sho, Id he Vistallwl over lite prepared suhgrarie in i,rovide a capillary barrier P Mulvanny-Lee&Associates RC. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 16, 1993 Page 12 r and to minimize subgrade disturbance during construction. This crushed rock material should be well- graded,angular, and contain no more than 5%passing a# 200 sieve. Sin•,, the northern half of the proposed building is in cut, and occasional lenses of perched groundwater were observed In the subsurface, we feel that the possibility of moisture accumulating under the building floor slab exists If floor moisture Is a concern, we recommend installing an Impermeable mernbrane between the crust ed rock and the floor slab to minimize floor moisture. To maximlze water tightness, the r membrane must ..)e installed In acco,dance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Normally, a thin sand layer is placed both below and ibove the membrane. The lower sand layer Is to protect the barrier from punctures during construction. ind the overlying layer is to prevent differential moisture loss In the concrete gel which can result in slab curt. In general, a 6 mil polyethylene barrier Is suitable for this purpose If the contractor takes care not to damage or tear the material during Installation. 4.8 Subaurfece Drainage During site contouring positive surface drainage should be maintained away from all building foundations. Perimeter footing drains are recommended around all exterior footings at, or slightly below, the base elevation of the footings. Underslab drains should not be necessary unless seeps or springs appear in the building subgrade. All drainage systems should be sloped to drain by gravity to a storm sewer or other positive outlet. Water from downspouts and surface water should be. independently collected and routed to a storm sewer. This water mi,._ not be allowed to enter the subsurface drainage system. The following figure Illustrates typical foundation perimeter drainage. I III 41nch Diameter Perforated PVC _15w,Typ. ` Pipe Arorrwid None oven Filter r 11311c — Impermeable Membrane s--Open r, led i;rushed rushed -- 4k�ck i Mulvanny-Lee&Associates!'C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 16, 1993 Page 13 4 Utility_K)Qgyatigns The exploratioo pits were excavated easily with a Case 580 K rubber tired backhoe. No rubble fill, Moulders, rjr other excavation obstructions were encountered during our subsurface exploration. No side wall Instability was observed in the exploration pits. However, minor seepage of perched groundwater was noted at depths of seven to 10 feet in several of the exploration pits. Although not observed in the exploration pits,vertical slopes In flee-gralm d soils of this nature often collapse suddenly and without warning. It Is recommended that all utility excavat'ons deeper than about three to four feet be shored in conformance with OSHA standards, or be sloped no steeper than 1H:1V. Flatter :lopes may be necessary If caving occurs, or if heavy flows of groundwater are encountered. During the winter and spring ek^.avatlons below perched or static groundwater are expected to require occasional dewatering with a sump I ump. Shoring and dewatering systems are typically designed and provided by the contractor. 4.1 ei m1 har gterizatI n Recorded significant seismic activity In the Immediate vicinity of this site Is limited. Currently the F',e Is in UBC zone 3,where a Z factor(developed to be equivalent to peak effective horizontal ground acceleration in ' g's) of 0.30 may be used. A she soil coe"IClent S3 with a V81Ue of 1.5 may be used In base shear calculations. The site's near surface soils are not particularly susceptible to liquefaction, and during a zone 3 event we would anticipate that softening of the site soils would be minor and would result In negligible footing settlements. Developing site specific response spectra is beyond the scope of this work, end we recommend using USC developed spectra. 5.0 PAYEMENT DESQN In order to facilitate pavement design,we have conducted two CBR tests c i `ie near-surface clayey silt soils sampled at this site. Based on this Information we feel that the following should be used for pavement design: Relative Resilient Comg�`'I,5n COR k Value Modulu3 (gsi) 95% 4 125 A,nn0 We have alternate pavement designs for both wphait and portland cement concrete. All designs have been prepared in accordance with widely acceptr.d AASHTO design methods. We have provided a range of pavement designs for various traffic conditions. These pavement sections, are provided in Table 5.0, r Mulvanny-Lee&Associates F.C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 16, 14993 Page 14 Pavement Designs. Our designs assume that the subgrade will be prepared in accordance with Sections 4.1 and 4.2 except that the top eight Inches should be compacted to 95% relative to AASHTO T-180 or ASTM D- 1557. Specifications for pavements and base course should conform to current Oregon State Highway Department specifications, with the addition that the base rock should contain no more than .5% passing a #200 sieve, and that asphalt concrete be compacted to a minimum of 91% relative to Rice density. ! TABLE 5.0 PAVEMENT DESIGN ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT: Approx. Nui,,:,-,r Approx. Number of Asphalt Concrete Crushed Rock of Trucks lwr 18 kip design axles Thickness Base Thickness Da iph why; (10001AL in.) Auto Parking 10 2.0 7 5 22 2.5 8 10 44 2.5 9 15 66 2.5 10 25 110 3.0 10 50 220 3.5 11 100 440 4.0 12 150 660 4.0 13 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAV7MENTA5 Approx. Number Approx. Number of P.C.C. Crushed Rock of Trucks per 18 kip design axles Thickness Base Thickness h way) (1000 in. _-In. 5 22 5.0 0 10 44 5.5 0 15 66 6.0 0 25 110 6.5 0 50 22.0 6.0 6 100 440 7.0 6 15) 660 7.5 6 Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 16, 1993 Page 15 ASPHALT CONCRETE WITH ASPHALT TREATED BASE:6 Approx. Number Approx. Number of Asphalt Concrete Asphalt treated of Trucks per 18 kip design axles Th;ckness Base Thickness QaY.0AQh w s) (190)_ _.Qn.) _Qn.) 5 22 2.0 b 10 44 2.0 7 15 66 2.0 7 25 110 2.5 7 50 220 3.0 8 100 440 3.5 6 .,0 660 4.0 8 Not_es_: 1) All pavement sections were designed using AASHTO design methods. 2) All pavement sections assume an AASHTO reliability level (R) of 90%,with a terminal serviceability of 2.0 for asphalt concrete, and 2.5 for cement concrete. 3) The 18 kip design axle loads are estimated from the number of trucks per day using State of Oregon typical axle distributions for truck traffic and AASHTO load eq iivalency factors, and assuming a 20 year design life. 4) Concrete design based on a modulus of rupture equal to 550 psi, and a compressive strength of 1000 psi. 5) Concrete sections assume plain jointed or jointed reinforced sections with no load transfer devices at the shoulder. 6) Asphalt Treated base refers to"Plant Mix Asphalt Treated Base"with a minimum Marshall stability of 1200 lbs. If possible, construction traffic should be limited to unpaved and :entreated roadways, or specially constructed haul roads. If Yiis Is riot possible, the pavement design selected from Table 5.0 should include an allowance for construction traffic. Stabilizing the top of subgrade with a fabric may be helpful and enonomlcal. We would be happy to provide appropriate fabric specifications and corresponding rock thickness reductions upon request. Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco Page 16 ,June 16, 1993 g 6.0 FUTURE GEUTECNNICAL ERVICES ' The recommendations contained in this report are based on Information gathered during our fieid s`. dies and literature review, and on Information provided by Costco, Mulvanny Lee&Associates, W& H Pacl ic. In order to correlate preliminary soil data with the actual soil conditions encountered cluring construction, and to check for construction conformance to our report, we also reco,nmend that we be retained for construction obtiervation of stripping, grading, compactlon, foundation excavations and other soi!s relatad portions of this project. It Is particularly Important for us evaluate areal settlement data, to ascertain settlements are esentially complete before foundation ant framing aegins. We have not yet ecelved a detailed copy of the plans for this ,ro;cct. We recornITiend that we i;n provided an opportunity to review the final plans ar+d specifications,.nen they become available. This will all)w ua to determine whether nny change in concert may have affected the validity of our recommendations, and whether our recommendations have been correctly Interpreted. If you have anv questions or desire further informat'.-m, please fe free to ce Tt act the w idersigned. �D R RZA AGRA,INC. � OREOON 'R.WARREN KRAGER1 R Warren Krager,P.G., Senior eolrxgist ,t,OLOG S� c� 1 MA311 �► Stuart Albright P.E.,S or Got Mini - ngineer L V n � o!!l�(t0�' 0 � NOTE ----�� DRAWING BASED ON PLAN PROVIDED BY : W&H PACIFIC PROJECT NO. 4-304-030'1 CADD DWG.0304PR02,DWG __ --- EGEND: XREF: TIGARD — — TP 13 D APPROXIMATE TEST PIT l OCATION DATED: 617/93 � --' . 7gTH AVF..- .� • � tic PROPOSED \ 9� COSTOO BUILDING ` TP- 3 TP9 TP- 4- - -- - --- ------ D p Ll I P.13 ---- j TP-12 j i I 1 I j TP- 6 D TP-8 TP- 1 Ll WET LAND DELINEATION LINE TP-10 p ! 1 D I I TP-11 TP--6 i ' v D p 1 �. ------------------ TP- 7 PLATE 1 RZA AG R A, Inc. WO• X16984-00SITE PL AN-APPROXIMATE TFST PR LOCATIONS W-wwtvWw6oa►Z*mn BAtw(Mbk100 DESIGN RWK.__—_ R.ULVANNY-LEE AND A49MATES 120 60 0 120 240E-T ENGRIFERING&FWW*MENTAL SERVICES DRAWN ML —_ COSTCO WHOLESALE COMP — - --- ?Maw T.a,GnowArhw DATE -j8 7 —4— TIGARD,OREGON wnmrA Orem SCALE NOTED Plww 00OX 40 Fin M AWW rmsE ORMMNOE ARE THE PROPERTY(7F RZA AGRA CONSULTANTS AN)AW NOT CAD FILE NAME: TESTPII S OGN TO�RE"MM)CED H ANY NIAM(ER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN N(OF RZA AGRA. Mulvanny Lee 8 Associates 21-5984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 18, 19r43 Page 1 TEST PIT LOGS_ Dtuth jtt� Materials Encountered Test Pit No. 1 0 0.5 Sora and medium gray brown Topsoil. 0.5 8.0 Stiff to medium stiff,damp to moist, medium brown lightly mottled Silt. 8.0 11.0 Medium stiff, moist to wet, medium brown and light brown mottled Silt. Test pit terminated at 11 feet,and backfilled upon completion. Test Pit No. '1 0 1.5 Dark brown Topsoil Fill with terra cotta brick rubble. 1.5 10.0 Stiff, moist, medium brown lightly mottled Silt. Test pit torminated at 10.0 feet,and backfilled upon completion. Test Pit No.3 ' 0 0.5 Sod and rooty,dark brown Topsoil. 0.5 8.0 Medium stiff to stiff,damp, medium brown Silt. 8.0 11.0 Stiff, damp to moist, medium brown and tan Silt. Slight seep of perched groundwater at 8 feet. Test pit terminated at 11 feet and backfilled upon ' completion. Test Pit No.4 0 - 1.0 Sod and dark brown, rooty,Topsoil. 1.0 - 1 '.0 Stiff, damp to moist, medium brown slightly mottled Silt. Slight seep of ' perched groundwater at 7 feet. Test pit terminated at 11 feet and backfilled upon completion. ■ Test Pit No.5 ® 0 - 1.0 Sod and dark brown Rooty Topsoil. ' 1.0 8.0 Medium stiff to stiff,damp, medium brown lightly mottled Silt. 8.0 11.0 Stiff, moist, yellowish brown Silt to uayev Silt. Test pit terminated at 1 I feet ' and backfilled upon completion. Mulvanny-Lee&Associates 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 18, 1993 Page 2 TES's t'IT L_OG__S_ DeSthlftJ Materials Encountered Test Pit No. 6 0 0.5 Sod and dark brown rooty Topsoil 0.5 8.0 Medium stiff to stiff,damp, medium brown slightly mottled Silt. 8.0 - 11.0 Stiff, moist to wet, medium brown Silt. Perched groundwater seeping Into test pit at 10 feet. Test pit terminated at 11.0 feet and backfilled upon completion. Test Pit No.7 0 0.5 Sod and dark brown rooty Topsoil. 0.5 - 5.0 Stiff,damp to moist, medium Silt 5.0 10.0 Stiff, wet to moist, medium brown mottled Silt. Trace of perched groundwater seepage into test pit at 5-6.5 feet. Test pit terminated at 10.0 ' feet and backfilled upon completion. Test Pix No. 8 0 - 0.5 Sod and dark brown Topsoil. 0.6 - 4.5 Medium stiff to stiff,damp to moist, medium brown Silt. 4.5 - 8.0 Stiff, moist, medium brown lightly mottled Silt. Test ph +terminated at 8.0 feet and backfilled upon completion. ast Pft No. 9 0 16 Sod and dark brown Topsoil. 1.0 - 7.0 Stiff, damp to moist, medium brown Silt. Trace of perched groundwater seepage at 4 feet. Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet and backfilled upon completion. Test Pit No. 10 0 1.0 Sod and dark brown Topsoil. ' 1.0 - 7.5 Stiff, damp to moist, medium brown lightly mottled Silt. No seepage observed. Test ph terminated at 7.5 feet and backfilled upon completion. 1 rive 477 Sd,Tech Center RZA 9GRAp Inc.• Portland, Oregon 97223-8024 Formerly: Rittenhouse-Zeman&Associates, Inc.) (503; 639-3400 Engineering & Environmental Services FAX (503)620-7892 August 11, 1993 21-06984-00 Costco Inc. c/o Muivanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 122.00 Northup Way Bellevue, WA 98005 Attn: Mr. Kelly McBride SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION PROPOSED COSTCC.STORE TIGARD,OREGON Dear Mr. Mcbride: In accordance with Costco's authorization, we conducted five additional borings on the proposed Costco store site in the residential subdivisioo that was not previotisly accessible to us. The proposed building pad Is situated In this area. The approximate location of the horings Is shown on the attached site plan. Logs of the borings are also Included at the end of this letter. The purpose of the addftioanl subsurface explorations was to confirm geotechnical soil conditions In the proposed bullding area, and screen for possible environmental contamination. A letter report discussing the findings of the environmental screening will be sent separately. The five borings In the huilding area encountered shallow manmade 01 and native clayey to sandy silts, and p-,rrhed groundwater at multiple levels. In general, the SUbsurface conditions observed In the supplemental borings In the proposed building pad are consistent with conditions observed In previous subsurface explorations on the balance of the development area. We previously prepared a preliminary geotechnical engineering report for this project that outlines our recommendations for site preparation, grading, foundation design, drainage, and other geotechnical concerns. Based uii the additional subsurface explorations, it Is our opinion that the conclusions and recommendations provided in the preliminary report are applicable to the proposed building area. The following recommendatlons are supplemental to the preliminary geotechnical engineering report prepared for this project. O AGRA Earth&Environmental Group Mulvanny-Lee 8,Associates P.C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tiqard Costco August 11, 1993 Page 2 .aITE PREPARATION - Significant uncontrolled fills or other soil conditions detrimental to the proposed development were not encountered In the borings. However, minor landscape or topsoil fill is present on a number of the existing lots. Undergn fund utilities, floor slabs, foundations, and possibly basements are also present on the existing lots. As discussed in our preliminary geotechnical engineering report, we recommend complete removal of non-engineered fills and previous Improvements and N okfilling the resulting excavations with compacted crushed rock. After stripping artd removal of previous Improvements, we should be retained to observe tha prepared subgrade. RETAINING WALL. BACKFILL AND DRAINAGE - Significant groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from ten to 20 feet below the ground surface In the two northern borings, B-1 and B-2. It Is expected that significant water will be encountered in the proposed retaining wall cuts on the perimeter of the development area, and possibly in floor slab or pavement subgrades. Adequate retaining wail drainage will be required to prevent excessive wall pressures from developing. Backfill behind retaining walls should consist of free-dralning granular material. To minimize pressures on retaining walls, we recommend the use of crushed rock backfill (conforming to 4SHD Standard Specification 703.08). Use of other material could increase wall pressures. Overcompaction of this fill can greatly Increase lateral soil pressures. We recommend that this fill be compacted to between 88% and 90% relative compaction (ASTM D-1557). In addition, we recommend that all fill within about five feet of retaining walls, be compacted with Iightweij1ht, hand-operated egr.tipment. The following figure illustrates recommended retaining wall backfill arrd drainage details. _ Wall Drain Material Such as Miradrain SAND BACKFILL ---_� NAME SAIL —D F ��� I ----- -- --Pea Gravel Approved Non-woven Filter Fabric t-- Perforated P': Pipe Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 21-6984--00 Proposed Tigard Costco August 11, 1993 Page 3 SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE - During site contouring positive surface drainage should be maintained away from all building foundations. A one to Iwo percent slope away from the building pad should be sufficlent to control surface water. However, in cut areas seeps of groundwater may appear on surface grades, and these areas should be provided with drainage. For this project we recommend excavating a cut-off trench in the subyrade and Installing a perforated drainage pipe within an envelop of free draining gravel. Drainage details should be provided on a case by case basis. Failure to install adequate drainage may result In premature pavement or floor slab failure. Perimeter foundation drains are recommended around all exterior footings at, or slightly below, the base elevation of the footings. !f finished floor elevations are below adjacent exterior grades,or if seeps or springs appear on the building subgrade, we recommend underslab drains in addition to the foundation perimeter drainF. All subsurface drains should be protected by a filter fabric to prevent internal soil erosion and potential clogging. All subsurface drainage systems should be sloped to drain by gravity to a storm sewer or other positive outlet. Water from downspouts and surface water should be Independently collected and routed to a storm sewer. Surface water must not be allowed to enter the subsurface drainage system. The following figure Illustrates typical foundation perimeter and underslab drainage details. 41nc h Diameter 15 fest,Typ. Perforated r'VC- pipe — Approved ---— Non woven — ----Impermeable Membrane � Filter Fabric —Open Graded rrushed — Rock r� Mulvanny-Lee&Associates P.C. 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco August 11, 1993 Page 4 PLAN REVIEW AND GEOTECHNICAL CQNSTRUCTION OBSERVATION - We have not reviewed final grading, wall, and foundation plans for this project. We recommend that we be provided the opportunity to do so in order to determine whether any change in design may have affected the validity of our recommendations. We also recommend that we be retained for construction observation of stripping, grading, compaction, foundation excavations, and other soils related construction operations in order to correlate preliminary soil data with the actual soil conditions encountered during construction, and to check for construction conformance to our report. We appreciate the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this Information, please contact the undersigned. RZA AGRA Inc. ��ERTIfiIF� .� I OREGON / R.WARREN KHAGER R.Warren Krager, C.E.G., S or Engineering Geoiogist `cFH/NG rj Stuart Albright, I. 1E., Sen technical Engineer 14,43t #� OR"G 2tl SRT ALB��d �2 Q5 0 R. HANS GRUIVBAUM 1 I I I MR. R MRS. FRANK j w SCHREINER :D ■ 11750 LU - 8-3--- > APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF j 1-- HEATING OIL a' U.S.T. I � I I I LEGEND Qp-, TEMPORARY vB"5 ENVIRONME14TAL I ! 84 MONITORING; j ! WELL LOCATION B-4 11935 1 GEOTECHNICAL SOIL t-_.---- ------ ---_----- BORING LOCATION , I 120 60 0 120 240FT SCALE: 1"_120' PLATE 1 RZA. AGRA, Inc. W.O. -10-6-014-02 - RUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOCATIONS �IUNwouwbnun6AMocI ,MrJ DESlQN D.S.R. PROPO^�E4COSTrOSTORE a 0MR0101= 1m DRAVM W.R.N.�M_ HIGKiNAY 217 AND HIGHWAY 99 7mAw.Tech aArw►. SATE 8110/93 TIGARD,OREGON PortMd Orwq- fNOTED OIWns lAllr SJPJIOD Fft AlD71Q�C17ERi 1 3CALIt THF-9E d tAWWQS ABE THE PRW FRTY of rw AI:M aa+su.TANT9 AM ueE NOT `� CAD F,tE NAME: StTLP,LAN TO BE i1EPWD�CFD IN ANY MAW ER MA��THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF NU AGRA PROJECT: COSTCO -TIGARD START CARD NO.: N/A BORING No.: B-1 Eleva'ion Reference: NIA Well Completed: NIA Boring Method: HSA rn Groundwater Surface Elevation: N I A y w Relative Casing Elevation: N 1 A Borehole Diameter: 4" m Depth r V n 4 c 7 ,� A5 BUIL DESIGN a (feet) SOIL DESCRIPTIO,! Q. E �' 3 E o a o o — u:►- m ---- Dry,gray,CRUSHED ROCK(driveway fill) LEU NNN PPM NNN NNN NNN NNN NNN NNN Stiff,moist,rust mottled,gray- 5 brown SILT. 11 30 n7 ^7^� Well Point removed and �rN boring backfilled ^r^� with bentonite rD' 10— Very stiff,moist to wet,Just 16 30 mottled,gray micaceous.SILT NNN with trace clay,fine sand and NN weathered basaltic grAVel. a N _ nNN SW 8020 NDN �N nNN N NNN _-1- 2-DIa.Sch.44 15 1T 10 Very stiff,moist,fast mottled, ,ANN Twnpa ary PVC gray SILT,with trace of fine W"M Point sand N/yN •� /V N ' L.. 20 - — - -- __._—.— 26 60 wo . . VEry stiff,wet to saturated stmt ."a�'iI _ h,~fine SAND with some 9M. ,� _ 2'Dls.Sch.40 .020 Slot PVC — Well Sercen Very adtf,moist,nest mottled _- 25 gM SILT with trace cisy and fine sand. ryy N� TOTAL DEPTH 26.5 FEET 30 -- LEGEND RZA ARRA J09 No. 106984-01 24nch O.D. COSTCO-TIGARD I e000n vemdP� (SamplwNo.Shown) Highway 217 R Highway 99 (Sample No.Shown)iTigard,Oregon r Encwmtered grnundwater level Soil Analysis - - - WD Whiledrfllh,9 s0�s RZA AGRA, Inc. 82,10 (fest Method Shawn) ENGINEERING i3 U VRONMENTAL SERVICES w Measured static: 7477 SW Tech Center Drive SW groundwater level Portland,Oregon 97223-8024 Phone(503)639-3400 Drilling Started: N I A nrillirg Completed: N I A Logged By: D.S.R. PROJECT: COSTCO - TIGARD START CARD No.: N/A BORING No.: 13-2 Elevation Reference: N/A Well Completed: NIA Boring Method: HSA N Groundwater Surface Elevation: N/ARelative Casing Elevation: N/A Borehole Diameter: 4" U) m +i 'Dept!) u m N of v z (feet) SOIL DESCRIPTION �o C ; C '�A AS-BUILT DESIGN d qo N H -2 U t7 Dry,gray,CRUSIIED_ROCK(drivawaY fill) 's oLEU ...._ NN^/ ppm N�'N M N N N � NNN NNN NNN Medium stiff,moist,black mottled,Bray- NNN S4' 5 brown SILT,with trace day. NN 8 80 N N NNN N N NNN Well Point removed and boring backfilled with bentonite 10 St#f,moist,lightly rust mottled, ,, 14 20 gray,micaceous SILT,with trace clay,and rounded coarse sand. NNN NNti i ,� NNN SW 8020 N N NNh' NNN -1 2",X'.Sch.40 Very stiff,moist,rust mottled, �,N 20 20 --_ Temporary PVC black and gray,fine handy SI(.T, Nn� _ Volt Point with trace of day. ;N _- NN ny - ^^^N N� N N _ -N, 2014 139 W1 Stiff,saturated,rust mottled,gray, N N _ 8018 fine sandy SILT,with very tMnly needed sand. .�A'I 2"Dla.sat.40 N N - .0l0 sloe PVO WON ei0raan Very 0111,moist,lightly rust mottled, 28 gnry SILT with some day and trace of NNN_-2G )B 60 ',ire sand. TOTAL DEPTH 26.5 FEET 30 2dni+O.D. LEGEND RZA AGRA JOB No. 106984-02 split-spoon sample: Groundwater Analysis COSTCO-TIGARD with%nw�overrd l , (Sample No.Shown) Highway 217&Highway 99 Tigard,Orltgon Encountered groundwater level wD While d-illiog ��tl15 Soil Analysis raA AGRA, IrrC. 18240 (Test Method Strown) ENGINEERINO A EMVRONMENTAL f cRVICES Z Measured static 7477 SW Tech Center Drive SW groundwater level norilrnd,Oregon 9727.3-8024 Phane(563)639-3400 Grilling Started: N TA Drilling Completeci: .�__ Logged By- 0S.R. Boring B-3 { w STANDARD O PENETRATION RESISTANCE NHollow Stem Auger U 30 w tQ d a OJ. Blows per roolt140 Ib.h.130-drop) LU o U SOIL DESCRIPTION a O 1n 0 20 30 40 Dry...Dray...G.RUSHED.RO.CK.(driv .Wayltl .-... . ....... .. ; ; • j. 1 + - Stiff,moist,dark brown, A micaceous SILT with trace 1_- organic fragments(native fill) a' 1 i __...._.___..._ .._...._........._..._._..__ ..—.._.....___..........._............._.......... a -- Stiff, moist,black mottled, brown, micaceous SILT with trace clay,and widely scattered a , ;!_ l - .. . - basaltic gravel. N --_-• } - .1 - $- - i A i Til Medium -- 1 N, Medium stiff,wet, black mottled, A _ brown,micaceous SILT with trace pa clay and fine sand. °y - .-4 _ ,4. a 1 Very stiff,moist, lightly rust 1 mottled, brown,micaceous SILT, y I with trace of clay and fine sand. A' A' A' 2 Very stiff, moist, brown and blue y grey SILT,with some clay,and a r traco of weathered coarse sand. y ,a :d ,a a a Very stiff,moist,dark gray,clayey 'O; ZZ _ SILT. --A - TO'T`A-CDEPTH DEPTH-MZ FEET----- ---- -- � - - RZA AGRA JOB No. 106984-02 COSTCO -TIGARD LEGEND Highway 217& Highway 99 I 2.0"O.D.split spoon sampler P Sampler pushed Tigard, Oregon II 3.0"O.D.undisturbed sampler • %moisture content 3,0"I.D.Universal sampler Sample not recovered 3.0"I.D.Ring sampler Water level fluctuation RZA AGRA, Inc. G Grab sample interval V Static water level ENGINEERING&ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UCHEM Laboratoryfchemical analysis Piezometer lip 7477 S.W.Tech Center Drive Portland,Oregon 97223 Phone(503)635-3400 Fax(503)620-7892 Boring B-4 V � / AugerHollow Stem SOIL DESCRIPTION V y 1 1 I d silty TOPSOIL a p, brown : . , P r■■r ■ SILT with trace organic ..:. i ..m.■�/: ■:��C� (native fill). „ ■■ INNER ■■l on ■■� Stiff, moist, brown, micaceous man a r ii if■ILT with trace fine sand. poll Very stiff,wet. .fine sand. brown, micaceous SILT with some ■G 1�� C III•�■"■ 'C:: ' ' :'no::i ' 111 '■':� :CI: a so OR 3 uso on Very stiff, moist,dark gray,clayey I so mottled,brown,micaceous SILT, on II on I 111MIrl I ■■Ion BRUNEI mom I on 11 C::: : Innings N: Miles rMEN ■� i _■ Emmons son ►■ .■. ■■■■ Very stiff, I moist dark . : 4C=mB::�� sills:C1�: man @no =moons :::::::C:' �C:: C:C::son soon me a I dark • : gray,clayeyVery stiff. moist,lightly rust mottled, long on PINES! on on on ■ a 5 ■■■ ■■ on Il ■■ onion e no=■■ "Nis In some n ■mon ■ ■■■ .p■■■■� ■■ ■■■C1■ I: : �': ::1' 11' 1■C' 1 • . No. 1 C, 984-02 • • -D O.D. Highway 217 & Highway 99 split spoon sampler P Sampler pushed TigaM, Oregon 3.0"O.D. / I.D. rj 3.0"I.D.Ring sampler 's-Z Water level fluctivition RZA AGRA, Inc. G G—rab sample interval ♦ Static water level ENGINEERING&ENIARONMENTAL Laboratory1c'aernical analysis Piezometer tip 7477 S.W.Tech Center Drive Portimid,Oregon Phone 1 11 / 620-78::2 Boring B-5 ----- O r STANDARD O Q PENETRATION RESISTANCE C '_ Hollow Stem Auger -j 3: w q- W x 3 d ♦ 810"per fool(l k hammfffW drop) W W a O 0. ;OIL DESCRIPTION �d -L O O N 10 20 30 40 Sod and silty 1 OPSOIL Damp, brown and gray SILT with a� - widely scattered organic fragments " (native fill). O 1 - __-- —Shelby Tube pushed 12" P Stiff, moist, brown, micaceous A SILT with trace clay and fine sand. a 44 a 1 3helby Tube pushed 12" Moist,lightly black mottled, gray and P t - brown, micaceous SILT with some clay. a A P' A' 1fr-- Very stli,, moist,dark gray SILT A' with Some ,',IV. - a a Very stiff, moist, dark gray and brown, A clayey SILT with a trace of coarse sand. ----------------- -- - - --- TOTAL DEPTH 21.5 FEET 5• RZA AGRA JOB No. 106984-02 COSTC0 -TIGARD LEGEND Highway 217 & Highway 99 �- 2.0"O.D.split spoon sampler P Sampler pushed Tigard, Oregon 1 3.0"O.D.undisturbed sampler • alis moisture content 3.0"I.D.Universal sampler Samples nm, -recovered I� � 3,0"I.D.Ri ,sampler \l Water level fluctuation RZA AGRA, Inc. G Grab semi it u-,terval `J Static water level ENGINEERING a ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UCHEM Laboratorylche mic:al analysis Piezometer tip 7477 S.W. Tech Center Drive Portland,Oregon 97223 Phone(503)639-3400 Fax(503)620-7892 Mulvanny-Lee&Associates 21-6984-00 Proposed Tigard Costco June 18, 1993 Page 3 TEST PIT LOGS Depth (ft) Materials Encountered Test__Pit No. 11 0 in Sod and dark brown Top,;oil. 1.0 7.0 Stiff,damp to moist, medium hrowu Slit. Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet and backfilled upon completion. Teat Pit No,r2 0 1.0 Sod and dark brown Topsoil. 1.0 7.5 Stiff,damp to moist, medium brown Silt. Test pit terminated at 7.5 feet and backfilled upon completion. [O Pit No. 13 0 2.0 Sod and dark brown to yfack organic Topsoil Fill. 2.0 - 7.0 Stiff, damp to moist, medium brown lightly mottled Silt. No seepage observed. Test pit terminated at'7.0 feet and backfilled upon completion. LEVEL I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT COSTCO SITE HWY 217 AND HWY 99 TIGARD, OREGON PREPARED FOR: COSTCO, INC. 10-6984-01 1 ' Copyright 1993 by RZA AGRA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. MAY 1993 RZA AGRA, Inc. AGRA Engineering & Environmental Services Earth & Environmental Group //�� �± 7477 SW Tech Center Drive R Z A A G R A� Inc. Portland, Oregon 97223-8024 (Formerly:Rittenhouse-Zeman&Associates, Inc) (503) 631-3400 Engineering & Environmental Services FAX (503)6207892 1 May 20, 1993 10-6984-01 COSTCO, Inc c/o Mulvany Lee 12200 Northrup Way Bellevue.WA 98005 Attn: Chandht v Stever SUBJECT: LEVEL I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT HIGHWAY 217& HIGHWAY 99 SITE TIGARD, OREGON Dear Mr. Stever: We are pleased to present you with the results of our Level I Environmental Site Assessment for the subject site, an approximately 30 acre parcel located southeast of the intersection of Highway 217 and SW Pacific Highway !Hwy. 99) in Tigard, Oregon. The site consists of an undeveloped eastern portion and a western portion developed as a residential neighborhood. Access to the residential portion of the site was not part of this Level I Environments'.Site Assessment. The po';ential for adverse environmental impact to the subject site exists due to the she's close proximity to an up-gradient Underground Storage Tank (UST) cleanup facility. The UST cleanup facility is currently a Chevron gascline service station located across Highway 99, approximately 30 yards north of the subject she. According to ODEQ records, the Chevron facility is In violation of nu;nerous regulations following the discovery of a release of petroleum hydrocarbons to the soils and grourx'water from operation of USTs at the facillty. Irafo,rmation available at ODEQ Indicates that the potential for oif she migration of contaminants Is posslhle. No documentation indicating that Chevron has Investigated possible offsite migration at this facility was avriiighie at ODEO. We recommend drilling two borings with the collection and analysis of soils and, H encountered, groundwater samples. A proposal for the subsurface Investigation will be submitted under separate cover. If you have any questions or desire further Information at this ilme, please contact the undersigned at (503) 639-3400. Respectfully submitted, RZA AGRA, Inc. Colin Maclaren, Envlronmenta; E^lentist Catherine H. Demcheck, Site Assessment Manager .� nr;RA F��ih F l 1?�11oll ot'lal TABLE F CONTENT Pa_gg_.N�mber 0.0 SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 2.0 SITE DESCHIPTION 3 3.0 SITE HISTORY 3 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 3 4.1 Buildings 4 4.2 Underground Storage Tanks 4 4.3 Refuse and Debris 4 4.4 Site Drainage 4 4.5 Utilities 4 4.6 Transformers 4 4.7 Water Wells 4 4.8 Vegetation 5 5.0 SOILS AND GROUNDWATER 5 5.1 Soils 5 5.2 Groundwater 5 6.0 VICINITY ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDc' 6.1 ODEQ Ewironmental Cleanup Sfta Information System 6 6.2 RCRA L ist 6 6.3 Registered Underground Storage Tanks 6 6.4 Underground Storage Tank(UST) Cleanup List 7 6.4.1 "No Further Action"Facilities 7 6.4.2 Active UST Cleanup Sites 7 6.5 CERCLIS Facilities 8 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 L!st of Aendiues Ap'vndix A Well Logs Aprandix B UST Cleanup Files w COSTCO, Inc. 10-6984-01 May 20, 1993 Page 1 0.0 SUMMARY This report summarizes the findings of our Level I Environmental She Assessment of the subject site, an approximately 30 acre parcel located southeast of the intersection Highway 2.17 and SW Pacific Highway in Tigard, Oregon. The site consists of an undeveloped, eastern portion and a western portion developed as a residential neighborhood. Access to the resrlential portion of the site was not part of this Level I Environmental She Assessment. Key points are summarized below,and are discussed in detail In following section,. Site History: Period aerial photographs (1966, 1975 and 1990) supplement topographic maps and document that the eastern one-half of the site h-is been agricultural usage over the years. According to City of Tigard renords, the neighborhood on the site was developed In 1948. Vicinity property usage has historically been agricultural and residential. More recently, development In the area appears to be commercial In nature. Site Reconnaissance: The eastern one-half of the subject she is a rectangularly shaped, grassy field sluping gradiially to the south. Ponded water or saturated soils were observed on the southern portion of the site. The western one-half of the site Is a residential neighborhood located on either side of SW 79th Avenue. The neighborhood consists of approximately :;neteei; eurrPntly occupied residences. This portion of the site was not accessed as part of the Level I reconnaissance. Soils and Groundwater: The near-surface geology of the site consists of Late Pleistocene deposits of silts with minor very fine grained sands,and a trace of clay referred to as the Willamette Slit Formation. Standir,y water was present at the ground surface on the southem margin of the property. Based on the soil texture and faint soil mottling observed in subsurface explorations it appears that most of the she soils are moderately well drained. Vicinity Environmental Documentation: Five facilftles within a 112 mile radius and one facility across the street to the north or the site are listed on the ODEO UST Cleanup L.ist as having had a release. One Small ' Quantity Generator (SOG) Is located within a 1/4 mile radius of the subject site. COSTCO, Inc. 10-0984-01 May 20, 1993 Page 2 Conclusions and Recommendations: No evidence was observed Indicating the generation, storage, or disposal of toxic or hazardous materials at the site. An Underground Storage Tank Cleanup facility Is located In close proximity to the subject site. Because the release from this facility has not been adequately Investigated, the potential for adverse environmental Impact to the subject site exists. We recommend drilling two borings with collection and analysis of soils and, N encountered, grourOwater samples to determine whether the site has been affected from the release at the UST Cleanup facility. I've preceding summary is Intended for Introductory and reference use. A complete reading of this report is recommended. 1,0 INTR DUCTION The purpose of this Investigation was to gather information on site and vicinity property usage, to look for potentially contaminating activhie.3 and/or situations which might adversely Impact the site, and to assess the identifiable risks to the local environment (soils, g►oundwatet, etc.) of the site. The scope of work Includes: o a physical reconnaissance of the site and observation of surrounding properties for presence of any petroleum hydrocarbons used and/or stored on the site, unusual land colorations, physical Irregularities, and noticeable refuse piles as well as an exploration of current land use In the Immediate vicinity. o a review of publlshrr literature on the soils, geology,and hydrogeology In the vicinity of the she. o a review of available historical data pertaining to the site and adjacent property use, including but not limited to photographic archives and historic aerial photograrnmetry. o a review of available environmental documentF.;ion for the site and adjacent properties from local, state, nold federal environmental agencies. o a review of the Information obtained and assessment of the potential for hazardous or toxic contamination. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of COSTCO, Inc.; their lenders; and their agents; for specific application to the referenced scope of services in accordance with generally accepted environmental practices. No other warranty, expressed or Implied, Is made. In the event that changes in the nature, usage, or lavot,d of the existing site and nearby properties are made, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this repnil shall not be considered valid unless the rnanges are reviewed or verified In writing COSTCO, Inc. 10-0324-01 May 20, 1953 Page 3 2,0 SITE DES(f31PIL_ The approximately 30 acre subject site is comprised of an approximately 16 acre, undeveloped parcel and a residential neighborhood located southeast of the Intersection cf Highway 217 and SW Pacific Highway in Tigard, Oregon. The reskiential neighborhood consists -if r inr.een :,eigle family residences and is situated on either side of SW 79th Avenue which runs north/south through the western portion of the site. The residential portion of the site was not accessed as part of this Level 1 Environmental Site Assessment. The ur,driveluped field Is a grass covered, rectangularly shaped parcel sloping gradually to the south. Ponded water or saturated soils were encountered on most cf the southern one-third of the site. The site is located in the southwest 1/4 of Section 8, T2S R2E of the Willamette Meridian In Washington County,Oregon. 3'0 SIT HI TQRY The site history was documented by the use of historic aerial photography covering the she for the years 1966, 1975,and 1990, and by City of Tigard subdivision plat maps. rIn the 1966 plifitograph, a residential neighborhood Is located on the western portion of the she, and agriculture crr,ls are plctored on the eastern half of the site in the photograph. Highway 2117 is u:lder construction we;t of the site In the photograph. Vicinity properties appear residential in nature Interspersed with agricultural fields and commercial developments. In the 1916, arxi 1990 photographs, no changes appear to have occurred since the 1966 photograph. The 1975 aswi 1990 photographs show that most of the agricultural parcels in the vicint'y have been developed commercially. Construction of Highway 217 has been completed In the 1975 photograph. According to City of Tigard subdivision plat maps, the residential development was approved for construction In May, 1948. Building permits at the City of Tigard were not recorded prior to 1972. A&3 TE REC9NNAISSANCE Reconnaissance of the site was conducted on May 6, 1993. The Investigation was conducted on foot and the following observations were noted (Figure 2). Access to the site was along SW 79th Street. COSTCO, Inc_. 10-69844)1 May 20, 1993 Page 4 4.1 Buildings Nineteen single family residences are currently located on the site and are occupied. The residences appeared to be one and two story, fvocd framed buildings. Access to this portion of the site was not part of the Level I ESA. 4.2 4lnderstroun t r ge Tanks No evidence was observed indicating the presence of an underground storage tank(LIST)at the subject site. No LISTS are currently registered for the subject site. It is possible that resHences on the site are or have been served by underground heating oil tanks. 9,Rgfuse ani Qebris No refuse or debris was noted on the site. 4.4 S4g_P_raIna9g The subject she slopes gradually to the south. Areas of ponded water were observed on the southern one- thlyd of the she. A small stream of water was observed flowing south to the southeast corner of the she. The northern two-thirds of the site appear to be adequately drained. A line of hay bales was observed on the southern one-third of the site. The hay bales appear to have been put in place for erosion control. 4.� tliftigs Sewer service and water service Is provided to the she by the City of Tigard. Electricity to the residences Is provided by Portland General Electric. 4.6 Tr&nfiMg_U One pole mounted transformer was observed on the northeastern corner of the subject site. No evidence of leaks or spllls was noted. Ownership of the transformer could not be determined. 4.7 Water Well; No water wells were noted on the she. Vicinity well logs indicate that the local stntic water leve; Is between four and seven feet below the ground surface. Environmental reports indicate that the groundwater gradient Is to the west-southwest towards Fanno Creek. COST;;O, Inc. 10-6984-01 May 20, 1993 Page 5 4.8 yeaetation Vegetation can be indicative of subsurface conditions, and may show signs of stress where contaminants have been discarded. ?vegetation on the northern three-quarters of the subject site consists of a variety of ® grasses and herbs. The southern one-quarter of the site Is populated by a variety of deckluous trees, low I� shrubs, herbs and grasses. Veogetatlon in the residential n3ightorhood consists of landscaped ornamental vegetation. The upper portion of the site appears to have been cleared of vegetation as recently as the last growing season. No stressed or stained vegetation was noted on the site. 6,0 8L5AND_RQ 1VNNUWfATE R Our understanding of subsurface condftion3 is based upon RZA AGRA's subsurface geotechnical Investigation conducted on the subject site, and by the examination of goologic and hydrogeologic maps and local water well log Information. The near-surface geology of the she consists of late Pleistocene deposits of slits with m1nor very fine grained sands,and a trace of clay referred to as the Willamette Slit Formation. The upper 6 Inches!o two feet of the site soils consist of dark brown slightly organic topsoil that may have been cultivated a number of years ago. Underlying the topsoil and disturbed near-surface clayey silt to slit soils of the Aloha series, native soils consist primarily of silt,with very fine-grained sand, and a trace of clay. 5..2Gropnwater Perched groundwater on the site may be found at near surface depths on the southern portion of the site. Permanent groundwater is expected to fluctuate near elevation 160 In the vicinity of this site. According to ODEA environmental reports,the groundwater gradient Is directed southwest towards f=anno Creek. 8.0 VICINITY ENV I_QNMENTAL RECORDS A search was made for pertinent environmental records for those businesses that currently or have previously occotpled properties within close proximity to the site. A review was made of business activities in the site vicinity, and a listing was prepared that Includes those property usages that possess the potential for envloornnental Impact. The listing was then cross-referenced through directories, lists, and records available from the Fnvironrnontal Protewtinn Agency (FPA) and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), I e, thf, Rn,nurcP Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) list of Current Fully Regulated 1 COSTCO, inc. 10-6984-01 May 20, 1993 Page 6 Generators, Small Quantity Generators, the list of Current Treatment, Storage$L,;.3posal Facilities(TSD);the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation,and Liability Act List(C`.a;CUS -State and Federal Supertund); ODEQ's Environmental Cleanup Site Information System (formerly Site Assessment Database); the list of Underground Storage Tank Operators (UST); the log of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST);and the Spills report These lists are not necossarily complete or fully up-to-date. The facilities In the closest proximity to the project she have beers reviewed in more detail for their potential for environmental Impact than facilities located farther from the project site. ILI CIDES� nvirgnment f I nup-6itg(nfQnnation System This database Includes: 1) sties where there has been a confirmed r9lease of a hazardous substance. 2) sites where there has been a confirmed release and Investigation or cleanup has beer,initiated or completed, and 3) sites where there has been no confirmed release but where the Department has received Information Indicating there may have been a release of h-zardous substances. No facilities within a one-half mile radius of the sl;a are reported on this database(list dated February 15, 1993). §.g_R RA List A listing of hazardous waste generators, transdorters and treatment, storege and disposal 1;,rA ties Is maintained by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). No Fully Regulated Generator, (monthly producer of more than 1,000 kg of hazardous waste), or Treatment, Storage, or Disposal (rSD) facilities are listed as being located within a 1/4 mile radius of the subject she. Che Small Guantity Generator (monthly producer of less than 1,000 ::g of hazardous waste) is listed as being located within a 1/4 mile radius eIsis dated November 4, 1992). Small Quantity Generator Chevron USA, Inc. SS#98209 (ORD 987188877) 11747 S.W. Pacific Highway Up-gradient,across Pacific Hwy. to north fi_wistqrd Un er rg ound Storage Tank$ No USTs are registered with ODEA at the subject site. Six UST facilities are registered with ODFQ within a 1/4 mile radius of the subject site(list dated Anq ist 11, 1992). 1 COSTCO, Inc. 10-6984-01 May 20, 1993 Page 7 Apollo Charter Bwu Service 'ID# 9337) Chevron USA Station #98209(ID#492) 11655 SW Pacific Highwav 11747 SW Paclfic Highway 4 active tanks 4 active, 7 decommissioned tanks Up-gradient, 1; '40 Cross-gradient,across Pacific Hwy.to north Family Thrni Store (IDLY 10574) Tigard Gull (ID# 4870) 11615 SW Pacific Highway 11595 SW Pacific Highway 1 decommi sioned tank 3 decommissioned tanks Up-gradient, 1/5 mile Up-gradient, 1/4 mile Firestone#3564 (ID# 4870) U-Haul of Tigard (ID#4448) ' 11596 SW Pacific Highway 11552 SW Pacific Highway 1 decommissioned tank 3 decommissioned tanks Up-gradient, 1/4 mile Up-gradient, 1/5 mile ¢A. _Undgrid to u� Six facilities within a one-half mile radius of the site have been reported on the Undergroumi Storage Tank Cleanup List as having had a release. This list, dated January 12, 1993, Indicates the type of materials released, and whether the site was successfully remedlated (cleaned up) according to OUEQ standards. Four of the facilities have been assigned a "No Further Action' (NFA) status by ODEQ Indicating t``at they have met current ODEA minimum cleanup requirements and that no further work Is necessary at this time. 6.4.1 'No Further Action"Facilities Fred Meyer (34-88-0051) Panoco Shell (34-89-0296) 11565 SW Pacific Highway 11415 SW Pacific Highway Up-gradlent, 1/3 mile Up-gradient, 1/2 mile Fuller's Mobil/BP Station (34-89-0201) U-Haul Center of Tigard (34-89-0293) 11440 SW Pacific Highway' 11552 SW Pacific Highway Up-gradient, 1/2 mile Up-gradient, 1/5 mile 6.4.2 Active UST Cleanup Sites Chevron USA#98209 (34-90-0009) Tigard Gull #423 (34-89-0190) 11747 SW Pacific Highway 11595 SW Pacific Highway Cross-gradient, north across Pacific Highway Up-gradient, 1/4 rnlle 1 f r COSTCO, Inc. 10-6984-01 May 20, 1993 Page 8 r The Chevron USA facility had a release of miscellaneous gasoline from ars underground storage tank. Ancordir►g to ODEA files, soils and grour0water on the site hive been affected by this release. Monitoring in on the site hava measured high levels of petroleum product. ODEA files Indicate that any investigatiors to determine whether off-site migration has occiured have not been documented, and that Chevron Is In non-cornp1'3nce for not providing such Information. This site may pose a potential for Imoact to the subject sfte due to as dose proximity and to the elevated levels of petroleum product released. According to ODEA records, the Tigard Gull ar423 facility had a release of gasoline to the soils. Approximately 500 cubic yards of soils were excavated aixd treated on site during remedial activities which are currently continuing on the sfte. This site poses a low potential for adverse environmental impact to the subje,:t site due to the nature and distal iocation of the release. r C§_-QERWU$Facilftiej �f The US EPA, Region 10 CERCUS (Superfund) List, dated October 27, 1992, was reviewed to Identify and locate faciiftles within n 1/2 mile radius of the subject site which have been listed tinder the I-ederal Superfund prog-am. According to this list, there are no facilities listed within a 1/2 mile radius of the subject efts. 7.9 CONCLUSIONS ANIS REQQMMFNt�ATIQN$ The subject site Is an approximately 30 acre parcel located sout'least of Highway 2.17 aril SW Pacific Highway in Tigard, Oregon. The site Is divided Into an undeveloped, eastern portion and a western portion developed as .a residential neighborhood. The western portion of the site was nc t accessed as pxrrt of tha Level I ESA 4 rAn Undergt-lend Storage Tank Cleanup facility Is located up-gradient from, and In close proximity to tha subject 3fte. ODEO files indicate that the extent of the release from this facility has not been dociimnnted. This facility may pose a potential for adverse environm(Mal ., act to the subject site. We recon;+Wend conducting a subsurfac,. Investigation consisting of drilling 'w -)rings along the northwestern property boundary with sampf.ig and analysis of soils and groundwater, if encountered, to determine whether the contaminant pfurne from the UST Cleanup facility has migrated on to the subject site. r r 1 COSTCO, Inc. 10-6994-01 May 20, 1993 Paye 9 We appreciate the npportunfty of having seried you on this project. If you have any questions or desire further intormation, please feel free to contact the undersigned. RIA AGRA, Inc. Colin Maclaren, Environmental Scientist Catherine H. Demcheck, Senior Project Manager ._.--L d •iiwu. •;�r - -�- �� I •. a fir,, sem',r h�p�C •� �� - '-31..•r - :, ,� •I o: MIN. �b 4. P NINE _ t' •4.., • )� 1 ��'• � :... � ii .(�'• — I•• � ■ Id0 , iii t: / / • •; ��� ijJ II 1{i '• A �",\' � �j Orr Y-• '��F� r t- /3 �1. • J4 V. t r• 700 7 •,�•• a .� •1. :� . :. ' `,;-,��' r�:; �, SITE _� _ "� 3 NO .*�. ♦ do ' 10 `% - • • s� J•l J (-I r�/+ ��.. � •Vii, �/ 1�1 / i • ,r _ -+-�'""Q' �Cyt-?. `,1 oni ■ -Vo----3 L OJ -+.3i• _r JI .A Y .�}�' A -w iii�• •• •e r �� SCALL 124000 I � 0 1 MILE -� 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 E000 7000 FEET OREGON i �S 0 _-- I KILOMETER Ems' CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET QUADRANGLE LOCATION RZA AGRA, Inc. W-0. A0•t3984-01 - PLATE 1: SITE LOCATION MAP IN ENGINEERING✓3.EN[ARGNMENTAL BY -mm- — COSTCO,INC. SERVICES DATE HIGHWAY 217 AND S.W, PACIFIC HIGHWAY 7477 S.W.Tech Center Drive Portland,Oregon 97223-8024 STALE -SHOWN TIGARD,OREGON Ph-)no(Bf,3)639.3400 SOURCE:LI.S.G.S Beaverton 7.5 min.Quadrangle Foul 503 6207892 r �P r r � HHUBS r .1-IA'YBALE S SATO tED = RESIDENTIAL SOIL /STANDING AREA IWATER rr�r_Es PLATE RZA AGRA, Inc. W0• 811E PLAN RtlbmcMlwn,a=• �J DESIQN —_ C.013TC.o,INC. ROGa MYMONNIMALIOWF3 DRAWN HIGHWAY 217 AND SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY w71w.r*mCrnmw&" DATE: M2" TIGARD.OREGON imelMnd onwm m7_t_ mI SCA,.E NONE ir/0rN1 JW FIx SM�J�? TNESE DRAWM40S ARF.TIC PROPERTY OF UA ADRA 00NOMTAN78 AND ARE NOT (AL'FLE NAS: L2 TO 0E REPROM)CED IH A14Y WmNER WTHOW THE WRITTEN COMENT OF AZA AGRA. 1 i , N 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 THE FOLLOWING DOCUMEN 'T' S ARE OF POOR ORIGINAl.. QUALITY ? Q�9Ir AUG 13 1959 i � File Original and r WATER WELL REPORT ctete Well No.....-__..... FlrrSTA Copy with the Swi kTE NGINEER STATE OF OREGON STATE I:IVGINF.i;ti, j �'Y 1 . I SALEM, OREGON State Permit No. _..... ............ (1) OWNER: (11) WELL. TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is lowered below static level Name _Was a pump test made} y -- lE�`A24'Y'- --- ---- --_. _ n Y� No If es by whom} -. . Addrew �n% 0 O e_� - - Yield: _CaL/mla.with ft.drawdown atter " (2) LOCATION OF WELL: ee—palr0 N ; ' fount 1 t 1 er's number,u an 8atlee?set AO 114/tnln,with !t drawdovm attQr y �i11�1 l-wt�1ao_ y_ election T. H. Vh![ Arteslhn flow gyp.m. Date Haring and distance from section or subdivdon corner Temperature of wetez•110aa a chemical�wlysb made} ❑Yei z •(1t,)•WELL LOG: Diameter of well.. .V.IJt..._....._. i,.. nq Depth drilled ft De th of com leted'.well ' Formation: Describe bharacler,size of-fit ertal nnd.strttettlre, show thickness of aQt/ ars 4;4,the Idrd and nature of 4he vWcreat y ,may -.-. .gioa::.,3fi-T18 iLL� Tatum,penaNp`ed � c 'TAO?[- .f Y+. ' (3) 'TYPE OF WORK (check): ' New Ws11>I] Deepening.❑ RecondltloW4❑ Ab6iftQ r 4, It abandonment,de ocrilfe material and procedure in 214M IL A s .E t'r �tr,��'•` ` • ` PROPOSED USE(c1h Ek�:J:{. (b); E OF, t� �1•�a°„ : s Aomeatia :C* Industrial-[�tJ 1�rr IrrWatlon [3 Teat vl(ell ❑'� Q! t �. S'Z ,', ING IN$ . , ,�t•c.,_�_ rfo ar 7 w� t - Z1d lYt ntiom 7.,"1 .,.I:�..,.._ perforal'.i�y " yv "•tof t,,.,� i< :.:�;!.�"1ty '� P �, h•e ;}, I+• �� Herf r ° .'f�ai� �� �.Z,y 11� .,t 6 f•ArM J _ palYorattons 'pi[rNttt[,eni:E�a Name s Tree._ Slot Nm :: .Sit tf' to ft *ar r ,y, fit+_ w. Slot du__. _ berth `.w°1 1M.�o;_ _:tt'' Work s4arted '1Lt1D1 ri 'Comple411.6kwwY fig) CONSTRUCTION yi 1 (13) PUMP: } Was welt /ravel packed?J n Yes .p At[e of rrttvel: 8 E_. _..._._ _ . . Marufacturera Name _ _...__ _... Orevel placed from ... >R 'bo .. .._.�}f ............. tR . ................ Type: ............... ... ..........�...,....._...._.,.. .....,.. S.P. .._ ._._. Was a-gurfare seal provided? :W Yes O No Tn what depth?__ .,.,_ft -�—-- Material used in seal— }�O t,p �4 — Well Drlltees Matelbent. Did any strata con talq unusable wetert ❑Yes No _ This well was drilled under •ray iurisdichbri add this npor T�of watert ,_ bepth of strata true to the best of my knowled;ie and belief. Method of mT!MM strata oft 1 ^� j]y� NAME �' 1� 11 w � ...l!"tSh ` i< c�O...:.. .... (10) WATER LEVELS: a sn r ar 1 or print) �AAddress a.Qb°.aQrAzQXI............................................................ Static level ft below land surface Date Artedan prrewure T_ abs. per quare Inch Date Driller's wpa number 861aa o. •' ' rte » Log ACcePted7. [Signed] ..... ..»........,4" da lf' :yam ^..»..... ,Li (V eel m er) [Signed] )) ...' ..-.. d 1r ate .. 5.......... 19.!x. T ��6rytY� n �t...:... { License No. '............ AUf e ......Q...., 1 rk .............. Date ..... .... ' = I (VSE ADDIT110MAt,S"I:r"IF NEC SSAAY) WATER WELL ItGPORT File Original and Slate Well No. Duplicate with th!• STATE ENGINEER, STATE OF OREGON SALEM, OREGON Slate Permit No. .. ... (1) OWNER: (11) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level Is 7 f,r• or below static level dame n , Was a pump test madel Yes _No If yea.by wh_o_m_f Address JY Yield: `al./min.with —ft.drawdown after (z)-- LOCAff �rt�r�w �r.a.: County ,//J ,��.ia tier's number, It any- Balier test Qf gal./min.withL !t drawdown site w - Artesian flow g p.m. Date li Si 8 �on T. R, W.M. � Temperate of water 4yas a chemical analysis made? ❑Yum Bearl stance from section or a ib vision cor r ur - - _ (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well.....�.1.. .......lr Depth drilled _ It. Depth of completed well 01,6 _ Formation: Describe b color,character,else of material and structure show thickness of aQut ore and the kind and nature of the material in stratum penetrated, h at least one entry for each change of forms ItATERIAI. FROM Z J&TYI'E OF WOVK (check): -- -- ` ._— --- -- ----`� Well� Deepening El Reconditioning❑ Abandon 0 �� ti If abandphrrk•nt.describe material and procedure in Item 11. c oe. (4) PROPOSED USE (check): (S) TYPE OF WELL: ,/ ` -I - -- Domestic gl Industrlai ❑ Municipal E] notary Driven ❑ q.67-7-Y p7. Q /fly Cable ❑ Jetted C1Jetted on ] Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Dug Cl Bored [] - (, (G) CASING INSTALLED: Threaded❑ Weld a� _. Ditun. from ..._...�. ... R. to-.. _.ft. Gage .475 — ........... Diam from ....................... ft. to .................. ft. Gage ................. .................Dlam. from ..................._... ft. to ........................ ft Gage -.......... ».-._ (7) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? ❑Yea f�xo — — -------- -- s SIZE of-�Aaratlous tn. by. in. ) - _, ..-__perforations from _..__ .._____ft to ._-_.-.-._......... ft I, to: perforations trom „_.__.__._ _ ft .--_..._..._._._.... ft --- 4j0 ...--_._..perorations from . . ... .._...._ ft to ____.. _....._._...... ft - __.. - .. ... perforations from» _ . _. ft to ft. - - • • , n_ -- perforatf"from ..... ...._ ft to _,........._.............. ft (8) CCRT+'NS: Well screen Installed ❑Yes — s Nie , , _ ...... ...._............... Model N(, ...................._ ............. ------ -- ' - -- - nlam:.. I91ot size .,.__.4.Set from.. ..................=t to._._....... ,.......... DIam........t..... Slot size.. :._.._...:Stt from .'.._._:..............!t to ......_..._..._...... ft. Work startpa/ .& 42 10Comple!!!�titLIZ V CONSTRUCTION: (13) PUMP: Nell gravel packed? ❑YMANc Size of gruel: ..................:....._......._ Manufacturer's Name ......._:........«......................_............._............... ......_............... Gravel placed from ....................._._...... . to ......._....................... ft. Type: _.._......___ _.___... ............................................................R.P. .................. Wax a surface seal provided? ❑Yes ❑No To what depth? ................. ft. Material used in seal- Well Driller's Statement: Did any strata contain unusable waterf Yets (U.No - This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this rep( Type of water? Depth of strata true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Method of sealing strata off / NAME ... .Y....r..L1.27.................................. (Person, I or c.irporatlon) (Type or print) (10) WATER LEVELS: , static level �a mr- ft below land surface Date Address �y i1�--...�.esl�..Gl.<..... . ..a.1��....... Artesian pressnure lbs. per uare Inch Dat - Driller's well number .CY ........................................................... Log Accepted (Signed) ..-. at�....... . e 1 Driller) [Signed �,rr, ........... . . ice ., 19 , e License NO -..+ J...... ...................... Date ... . . ..... 1 (USE ADDMONAt,SI{EFTS IF NF('ES..9A17!') 9 NOTICE TO WATER WELL OWMACTOn The original and rlrt , t b- WATER WELL REPORT- of this report are Ln e tiled with the � ' Stale Well No. ...... ....F...................... STA'CP'.i:NC:INF.ER, SALEM 10, ORF.GOfj, TTE OF OREGON within 30 days from We dale I,ln • (peak-type or print) state Permit No. Y ............._... ..... of well completion. (1) OWNER: ; " - (11) WELL TESTS Drawdnwn to amount water level is • � ' n eyed below y aticwhom?level Name �/J � Wes a pump teal made?Q Yah No It yea, by Address -f/Q� - Ste/ f/O YIeld rat./min,with _ ft._drawdown aiter� (2) LOCATION OF WELL: Bauer teat County, /�/' H Drluer's well number ��tial./min.with lQ ft.drawdown after IL8_�,__-._ Artesian flow by !�section T. R W M: Temperature of orateyW! a chemical analysis madet_❑ Yea Bearing and distance from section or subdividon Corner _ _ (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below easing.._...._TI+.. Depth drilled ,f fl. Depth of completed well Formation:Describe b color,choracter raze of mawrlal and structu -- show thickness of aqu,fters and the ktnJ and nature of the material stratum penetrated, with at least one entry for each change of for p • ;.�_�ILL! -- - .mom--- -- — ---- - ----- MATERIAL FROM rTYPE OF WORK (check): Well rl DeepentnK Reconditioning Q Abandon i] � — ? If abandonment, describe ma e 1 and procedure In Item 14. . ,1 t: (4) PROPOSED iISL^ i = (,)'TYPE '< Domeatte �{Tnttustrlal` []�, • 4,a Rotary rel tiea 13/` t Cable ❑ ,r, ' UTWation 13 Text Well , +1 �., . t;) G INST •"' lam, fratlf � . , � l • Dtam. k; Fl + t� rfotaCOt4 � :+;• �•y. ,'4t u Y•' Vic, '�' ,WG. rrlt,hM,h t st•' .SIze1H perforatio u %1n,b _.........._Y__ Werra RUM1f, 'yi w. J p yY•e .f. 1..,--rPR M; �+r •. 'r fit' (.F ...._.e.... per" . KEENS >:f tri P, d••t .' ' ; elurpris Name , 1 _slot size _BetOln 1t< t04+.-,.__ _ it WOtk_atatted lA COOI feted. v >LQ_- '^. •• ldiatn. r._ _ Blot size Set flnm --------- ft to -n Date well drt111rtg machine moved off of (9) CONSTRUMON: (13) PUMP: ;} Well seal Material used in Ileal ..__:_.__.._......... .. ....... _ Manufacturer's Name ........._....... _. ..__ _: .............. �+. Depth o1 seal .__...... ----..........._..-. ft. Was a packer used? Tyr.c:__._._..._. ................. H.P. ____...... Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal ................................ In. - - Were any inose strata cemented off?❑Yes ❑No Depth .__ - ___ Wait Well Contractor's Certif#oat#on. Was a drl,,e shoe toad?❑Yes p'No 7Ilia Well was drilled tutder 1ny jurisdiction and this r. :r Was well gravel packed? [3 Yes ❑No Slee of gravel: trist to the best of my knowledge and belief. ^Gravel placed from _ ft to !t NAME 47 r (Person,firm or corparatlonl (Type or t Did any strata contain unusable water? Q Yes_❑No •' Type of watesf_- Depth of stta�a Address ....!?. D.h.2..�.. ._.l.'.-�........................................ ._.. Method of sealing strata offi? / rilling Machine Operator's License No. -.�.................... �I� (10) WATER LEVELS: [ Sl ed .............hit --...... Stade level .Z ft. below Land surface Dat �s � J/y ater Well oonttractn-r) '�: Artesia.�reaure �^Iba. per square Inrh Date _ Contractor's License Ro....7.........Date 1-..7.........., (USE ADDITION-_-,SiiP'E'I•S IF NECESSARY) / .a■.wa�r STATE ENGINEERwell@GOId STATE WELL NO. l20W-.- Salem,Oregon COUNTY . ......................tiva APPLICATION NO. ............... MAILING OWNER: _ � ' ADDRESS CITY AITD LOCATION OF WELL: Owner's No. ...................»..»...... STATE: .......-»......................»....................................... N. E. ...........Yd Sec. ...... T. ...—••-••.S.,R'.............W.,W.M. I Bearing and distance from section or subdivision ' -- +---- corner .........-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i I ._................................._...»..._-----•---......---._.......----•-------•-----•-•---••-••..........- , i i - »..._.._.. ....»»». ............ --••--------------- ......... ___ ---- ----L---- Altitude at well TYPE OF WELL: r4y;-t&P.... Date Constructed .................... � I Depth drilled...im:E ----.----Depth cased _--.- Section........................ CASING RECORD: A9Q7V1FJMSkZc w , ' •�;�' 3�r � •r.''L'Q1ot' �lf(����+�i.A1'•D.ILLI.y� 11 'I '... ( 1'7aR•. .'ill J'�, �i.' '. 1 �I..c I .�'1R`A Md til � �,V�ajy;.•��ic^ .. I�,� :4 �{' � } � -- ; t ' s •, s � r .. Yl.... ».. H.P. C VO TESTS; --- Swdown ..... ...... ft. after ........................... hours ................... .:. ..» ....». ^( Dt'awdown ft. after ............ hours I A USEOF WATER .........».».»__. ..... Temp. ............ °F. ......................................................... , . SOURCEOF INFORMATION. ....:1,_-aI.. .................................................,.............................................-.».......... DRILLER. or DIGGER .......................................................... ..... ........................_...... .......:... ... ADDITIONAL DATA: Log ................ Water Let-e1 Measurements .................. Chemical Aralysis .................... Aquifer Test ........ REMARKST State Printtna 89318 STATE ENGINEER STATE WELL NO. . .;Ijut Salem,Oregon Well Record I COUNTY .. ............... APPLICATION NO. ..... ............... MAILING OWNER: ......... ......................................•--._..._. ADDRESS: ...............---........................... C117Y AND LOCATION OF WELL: Owner's No. ...........................__ STATE: .......................................................................... N. E. "T 1 11 ........ Sec. ............ T. .....---•S..R.............W.,W-41. Bearing and distance from section or subdivision ---+----- comer............ ....................................................................................... ............................................................................................................. .................................._..._.---•--............_.............._ ....................................-1................................................................... Altitude at well ...... ? ------------ -------- ----------------------------- --- TYPE OF WELL: ----- Date Constructed ................... Depth drilled ..J.&.,a:_.//........... Depth cased..-.—..,........................ Section ...... ............. CASING RECORD: .0 7. J, AQ11H WATER ..... ............ PUMPING ................ ............ H.P. Capacity it��o WELL TESTS: Drawdo,%n ............................ ft. after ...................... hours ..................................... Drawdown ............................ ft. after ............................ houti, ...................... G USE OF WATER ......... .... ........ Temp. ............ "F. .. ....------------- I SOURCE OF INFORMATION ................ ...................... 1. DRILLER or DIGGER .................. ....... ............................................ ............................................................................... ADDITIONAL DATA: Log ................ Water Level Measurements .................. Chemical Analysis ....... ..... ...... Aquifer Test .......... r. REMARKS: State Printhw MIS STATE ENGINEER Well Record STATE WELL NO. Salem,Oregon COUNTY ............ki.aAuJI,"' � APPLICATION NO. ................ MAILING OWNER: ........... af....e-V.................................... ADDRESS: --- ................................................................. CITY AND LOCATION OF WELL: Owner's No. ........................ STATE: ........................................................................... I/ N. E. 4 ............Y4 Ser T. ...........S.,R.............W.,W.M. Bearing and distance from section or subdivision comer........................--•_...................... ........I........................................ ......... ............................................................................................... ............................................................................................... ------------------------------****----------*......­............ ........ Altitude at well ....••..9,r.6.... ................................... TYPE OF WELL: -do JIU.. Date Constructed ............... Depth drillcd_41e.c� .............Depth eased Section................... 5& .1�1_/P/Z/11 ------------ CASING RECORD: y. AQUIFZRS, WA7 441 PUMPING EQU111MEM: 7 * ...... .............. Capacity MEN WELL TESTS: Drawdown ........................... ft. after ......._..............•-•-• hours ....................................................................... G. Drawdown ............................ ft. after ............................ hours ........................................................................ G. USE OF WATER .................... Temp. ............ °F. ...... . it SOURCE OF INFORMATION .... �-e.,f........................................................ DRILLER or DIGGER ............................... ................................ ADDITIONAL DATA: 1,09 ----- --------_ Water Level Measurements .................. Chemical Analysis .................... Aquifer Test ..._.... REMARKS: /ef v State Prlittr4 B"18 UR L(r'uooHIE n■l andWELL REPORT Slate W01 No .... _••..•[ /••Y_-36 rlrst CoppwIth the STATE ENGLNEER, "r,�" ATE OF OREGON SAi.EM. OtiEt:f7N ( state Permit No. .... (1) OWNER' r�,rf�i�C�' (11) WELL 'j'I:STS: DN��y below inou leveler level Is Name j 1 ' Address 20.130 S. w B5iL — Was a P_""teat made?QYa Oj No lf70 b7 whom?_—,—_- Yield_: �.gal-/_mla with ft dt awdo`atter -- (2) LOCATION OF WELL: saver teat LI SaLfndn.with 5 fc _drawdown attar coont7lRa shiMton qLn ete numbe iIt■y— _ ?lection —'`` T. R. W11f• Artesian flow C.P.M. Date — _7st— ��— 1 �— Tetnperatumre o[water Z Was a chemical analyatr made? ❑Yp Bearing and dhMnee from section or subdivision corner — .. — (12) WEM I+OI': Diameter of well........................ �j.t Depfhdrilled _�?7 ft.^Doth of com�lleted well �1 rormation: Dsseribeb(/tron Ior,character,size of material and siructur ' show thickness of aqul)era and the kind and ature of the matertalA a stratum penetrated, t Ilk at least one entry for each change of form KATZRML MOM (3) TYPE OFWORK(check): , .. 4TH yellow Q]ay ---- _ -- row won ❑ Reconditl8ning.J3 Abandon❑' i COm;7o9ed `hone _e�mh rn _ V abandonment.'describe mumrlal and orooedmre*,Uem . , greyxoek .(streaks of 'oml 80P, ED� SIE ` r �'' E OF :� ' : g • _ A. Vr'1 ,l;d'r jr i w 4 Y'a`1• ' Y v•'rr4 l ,- .• t - •;. x''^' fHiA;4ui MA .•1�,. +w4•`.r�.r=r. y, blabs j' ,� ��� � ��' ' �J�1 f , �.,j ' ^•- ,y'�Y Aw •_ ,• a t 1 A �. • (8) SCREEN$:i dW,.11 x3 ' ''#' t ' ki= Hantttectltraris 2firtrt! Tjba . .._out size _flet fntm fT _..... Riot sire.____ Set from, + ..r ._ft b !t Completed started IY CoRlated (9) CONSTRUCTION: (1.3) PUMP: Was well gravel packed? [I Yea X1 No Sire of gravel: .._..... „ _ ...._ Mnnufactumr's Narne Gravel placed from ...._............_........__ ft. to ..........................._. tt. Type. H.P. Was a surface seal provided? 0 Yes p No To what depth?.....................ft. — j r ' Matetltl used in seat— Well Drllle..ep 8tater"ent: ,. Did an7 strata contain unusable water? ❑Yes d Tltie •.:FII was drilled under m > --- y jurisdiction and this rep, '>r 1�'p of water? Depth of strata _� _ true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Method of sealinn strata off NAME _Si AIS1Dl3I1_ Z.nS.......mv ............_..................... J(10) WATER LEVELS' , firm, nr mrt rallon) (Type or ria!) stab, level / nll,t,�5�5ll2..S.--�.- -A4cLnuh7..i.n,...Mi1�ta�ulcie...22. _ 31 ft_btlow IanQ_.urf.ce Datel���- !. Artesian pressure be. per s4uare inch Date l,rill�r', well n tuber ....51a,f� I.og Accepted T: !1 _ .............. I � I:,icnMl) �- _ �.T�,� � � Merl !...-.......r................. ..... ate - •---...-... ..--......_, lA �. (owes 1w License No. _........_....................... Date ..9,lQ/.61.. ......... 2 ., _ (UBS ADDITIONAL.BHEETB rr NECESSARY) I II I I Appendix B UST Cleanup Files j . t e i t I i DEPT Cf Ei�'Ji � �aE;IZ1t QIfAt1TY �� RL�t.14�O MAR 2 6 1593 - --- DEPARTMENT n HORTHv�RST REGION ENVIRONMENTA 2 0 QUALITY CERTIFIED MAIL P 991 13.5 252 Chevron U. S.A. , Inc. c/o Registered Agent CT Corporations Systems 800 Pacific Building Pcrtland, Oregor 97204 Re: Notices of Assessment of Civil Penalty No. UST-NWR-93-034A UST-NWR-93-034B :Multnomah County 1 The Department of Environmental Quality (Department) has documented numerous violations of the underground storage tank regulations by Chevron USA, Inc_. , at Chevron's facilities located in Multnomah County, Oregon. Specifically, the Department has documented violations at the following facilities: Chevron Service Station No. 98209 11747 SW Pacific Highway 34 - 10 - 009 Tigard, Oregon Facility Identif).cation No. 492 Chevron Service Station No. 91935 9811. S11 Capital Highway Z Fortland, Oregon Facility Identification No. 1243 The violatio.is include failing 'to submit required information, failing -to investigate contamirntion, failing to submit required reports, and failing to prepare and submit a Corrective Action Plan. These violations are mostly Class I violations and considered serious violations of the underground storage tank regulations. Additionally, the Department documented a violation at Chevron Service Station No. 93939, based on Chevron's failure to report a release from an underground storage tank within 24 hours. The Department is not assessing Chevron a civil penalty for the failure to report. However, if in the future Chevron fails to report a release from any of its #I facilities within 2.4 hours, the Department will assess a civil penalty for such violations. 811 SW Sixth Avenue rortlind,OR 97204-1: (503) 229-5696 TDD(503) 229-6993 DEQ-1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION 7 OF THE STATE OF OREGON 3 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ) NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF THE STATE OF OREGON, ) OF CIVIL PENALTY No. UST-NWR-93-034A Department, ) MULTNOMAH COUNTY t, V. ) Facility No. 492 6 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. , ) a Pennsylvania corporation, ) 7 ) Respondent. ) 8 I. AUTHORITY 9 This notice is issued to Respondent, Chevron U. S.A. Inc. , a l.0 Pennsylvania corporation, by the Department of Environmental ] L Quality (Department) pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 12 468. 126 through 468. 140, 466. 895, ORS Chapter 183 and Oregon 13 Administrative Rules (OAR) Chapter_ 340, Divisions 11 and 12 . 14 ;.1. FINDINGS 15 1. Respondent owns or operates Chevron Service Station No. 16 98209, located at 1.1747 Southwest Pacific Highway, Tigard, with 17 Facility Identification No. 492 (facility) . 18 2. On Jinu.ary 9, 1990, Respondent reported to the Department 19 that the facility was contaminated with hazardous substances 20 (petroleum) from an underground storage tank at the facility. 21 3 . In a letter dated October 5, 1990, Respondent said "we 22 anticipate installing additional monitoring wells in order to 2.3 define the extent of hydrocarbon compounds beneath the site. " 24 4 . By letter dated October 22, 1990, the Department requested 25 that the Respondent develop a corrective Action Plan (CAP) for the 2.6 facility. 27 j ?81 Page 1 - NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTY (CASE NO. UST-NWP.-93-034A) TABLE 2 Applied Geoter_hnology Inc. Analytical Summary - Groundwater Chevron Station No,60098209 DEQ ID No. 34--90-009 Tigard, Oregon EPA Method 8020 Sample Sample Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes 1.0. Date m-/!-L- .-LM-59--- _ (m9IL) MW-3 6/26/91 1.3 0.025 0.29 0.16 11/11/91 0.96 0.013 0.066 0.024 J 6/29/92 0.344 0.008 0.064 0.061 9118192 0.827 0.006 0.066 0.021 12%23/92 _ 0.346_ 0.003 0.035_ 0.041 MW-4 5/22/91- 0.16 0.0057 0.024 0.160 11/11/91 0.045 0.001 0.0008 0.002 6/29/92 0.002 NO NO NO 9118/92 NO NO NO NO 12/23/92 _4_9.001 _ NO NO NO I MW--5 5122191- 1 2.0 0.370 1.1 2.6 11/11/91 I 0.52 0.02 0.14 0.22 6/29192 11.530 0.044 0.162 0.450 9/18/92 0.446 0,050 0.122 0.411 12/23/92 0.673 0.234 0.692 1.67 _ F MW-6 5/22'91 1.9 0.041 0.911 �1.6 Jf 11/11191 1.1 0.041 0.82 1.1 abandoned_ _ MW-9 5/22/91 NO NO NO NO I +!11/91 0.0005 NO 0.0003 0.0007 9/18/92 NO NO NO NO 12J23/92 NO NO _ _ NO NO MW--I0 5122/91 NO NO NO NO 11/11/91 Na NO NO NO 6/29192 0.041 NO 0.004 0.002 9/18/92 0,021 NO 0.002 NO 12.123192 0.017 NO 0.002 0.001 Mekiod`RejioitiriLimit 0.0005 _ 0.001 0.001 0.001 i b (�Cleanup Levets> 0.005 _ `2 0 7 10 ! NOTES: mg/L = milligrams per liter which is approximately equal to parts per million NO = not detected at or above method reporting limit MW-6 was abandoned by AGI on 5/28/92 MW--9 was not sampled on 6129192 Method Reporting Limits are for 6/29/92,9/1802,and 1212.3192 sampling events: Method Reporting Limits for sampling events prior to 6/29/92 vary. l � I � S I I 1 00 00 \ 00,0000e S � \ Fw-LO 0 / �--Toe of Embankment AIV Used-Oil \ i Tank \ f Heating Oil Property ( Tank rJne I' I ti\aP M WI 0 MWg 95. 5 1 1 M W I Air & 1 0. 4 ' ' Water ce I -i, ;W6 4ti� 1r MW5 — Fire Hydrant 1iWa s 5 `,P 9� ♦ ���V PROPERTY LINE LEGEND — MZ9 Groundwater monitor well. r�•� Elevotlon of tap of casing Groundwater elevation MW-6 Q Location of abandoned monitor well OAoy 29, 1992) `—"f.0 Groundwater surface contour line (peewmber 23. 1992) r r, Approximate former location of undQrground storage tanks ., A Survey benchmark, a water meter cover, assumed elevation of 100.00 feet Inferred groundwater migration direction (December 23, 1992) All elevations measured In feet Contour Intr of — 0.5 Net N 0 30 60 Scale in Feet Base Map: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, April 1991. Applied GeotechnologyInc. GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR MAP Geotechnical Ergreering December 23, 1992 Geology d HyKirogeo" Chawon Station Na 60M 1 V �q, /pyl Tim e=- .1DB NUMBER r-DRAWN /�y� �"TT WE REVISED DATE CITY OF TIGARD January 3, 1993 OREGON Joel Yamauchi Mulvaruiy Partnership Architects 12200 Northrup Way Bellevue, WA 98005 Project: Costco- Plan Check #12-50C 7835 SW Dar -.mouth Street Subject: Building Plan Review ( 1991 UBC with Oregon Amendments) The plans for this project were reviewed for conformity with applicable codes . Please submit. the following items for completion of the plan review process at your earliest convenience: 1. The one-hour . fire-rated occupancy separation walls between room 128- tire installation and rooms 130- tire sales and room 119- optometry, to have 5/8 inch type X gypsum board on each side of the 6 inch metal studs. See sheet A-S- wall legend. 2. Provide drinking fountains (5) per Table 5--r and Section 3109(x) 1 and figure 27 of Chapter 31. 3. The rest rooms shall. have a smooth hard nonabsorbent surface which extends upward onto the wall at least 5 inches (section 510(c) 1) . 4. Submit the Oregon energy compliance form for review. Please specify on the plans the 11-values for the various types of insulation used. 5. Storage and use of flammable and combustible liquids shall be in accordance with the Fire Code (section 708) . 6 . Devices generating a glow or flame capable of igniting gasoline vapor shall not be installed or used within 18 inches of the floor in any room which Class I flammable liquids cr gas are used or stored (section 708) . 7 . Laboratories and vocational shops in buildings used for educational purposes and similar areas containing hazardous materials shall be separated from each other and other portions of the building by not less than a one-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation. When the 13125 SW Holl Blvd.P.O.Box 23397,Tlgard,Oregon 972-23 (503)639-4171— quantities of hazardous materials in such uses do not exceed those listed in Table No. 9-A or 9-B, the requirements of Sections 905 and 908 shall apply. When the quantities of hazardous materials in such uses o ceed those allowed by Table No. 9-A or 9-B, -the use shall he classified as the appropriate Group H Occupancy. Please submit a list and quantities of hazardous materials for review. Occupants in laboratories havii.g an area in excess of 200 square feet shall have access to at le.3st two exits from the room and all portions of the room shall be within 75 feet of an exit (section 702(c)3) . 8. Provide a curb ramp detail for the east side of the building located at the har)dk_-apped crosswalk in compliance with Chapter 31. 9 . One in eight accessible parking spaces, but not less than one, shall be served by an access aisle 95 inches wide minimum and shall be designated van accessible (Table 31- A, figure 9, and section 3104(g)2B) . Pl cease sul mit a signage detail for the van accessible spaces. 10. Other accessible parking spaces (not van) , shall have an adjacent access aisle not lass than 72 inches wide (section 3104(g)2C) . 11. Submit a typical curtain board detail for review. 12. Key-locking hardware may be used on the main exit only, if there is a readily visible, durable sign on or adjacent to the door stating, "THIS DOOR MUST REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS" (section 3304(c) exception Interior doors to have lever hardware. 13. As required per Table 33-A, room 131- employee lounge, has an occupant load of 59 and will require a second exit which is separated per section 3303(c) . 14 . The site access stairways shall have handrails on each side. The top of handrails and handrail extensions shall_ be placed not less than 34 inches or more than 38 inches above the nosing of treads or landings. Handrails shall be continuous the full length of the stairs with at least one handrail extending in the direction of the stair_ run not less than 12 inches beyond the top riser or less than 23 inches beyond the bottom riser. Ends shall be returned or shall terminate in newel post3 or safety terminals. The handgrip portions of handrails shall be not be less than 1-1/2 or more than 2 inches in cross- sectional dimension or the shape shall provide an equivalent gripping surface (section 3306( j ) ) . 1.5 . Submit two copies of the construction documents (spec ifi.catic. -► book) . 16 . Submit a typical detail for the screen wall. See sheet SD-1. 17. A1.1 fills to be compacted to a minimum of 90% or per, engineers specifications, whichever is greater. Compaction reports shall be submitted to the Building Division. 18. Submit a seismic bracing detail for the mechanical equipment on the roof which exceeds 500 pounds per unit (detail 3/M-6?1 . The following site review concerns are noted: 1. Show compliance with all of USA's erosion control guidlines (sediment fence every 300 feet, etc. ) . See sheet C06 . 2. Details referenced at rock walls are for keystone. rlhic are you using? Plans must reflect proper details . See attached rockery construction guidelines . Show compliance with all sections including 2 .01, 3.0101 (second paragraph) , 3.01.6, 3.01.7, 3.01 .8, ( 10" lifts) , 3 .01. 17, (first paragraph) , and 3.01. 18. 3. Provide soils report. Plans show up to approximately 30 feet cuts at north Level II analysis borings B1 and B2, with a 1.2'-0" water table depth. Any special provisions? Further corrections may follow upon review of the soils report. 4. volume of cut, volume of fill? 5. Spec permanent erosion control for'-all' slopes steeper than 3: 1. 6 . The owner needs to be aware of the requirement for professional inspection of grading, with final reports submitted to the City of. Tigard's Building Division pursuant to Sections 701.4 and 7015. 7 . A pre-construction meeting will be required. 8. All l;a.ges of the plans need to be signed by the architect or engineer of record. 9. Special inspections will be required for the keystone wall . The following structural concerns are noted: 1 . Please submit the metal. building plans, details, and calculations, including lateral analysis. 2. Submit calculations for CMU walls and attachment to the roof system (out-of-plane loads) . 3. Submit calculations, plan;;, and details for metal storage racks. 4. The footing calculations have not been fully reviewed (pending item #1 above) . 5. Where is the base connection from sheet RM4 of the calculations detailed? Is it used .for both mezzanines? 6. Further corrections may follow based upon the review of the above. Please contact David Scott, P.E. to discuss the structural concerns listed above. Please make these corrections on the appropriate P the drawings and resubmit 3 copies of each page to the Cit, Tigard for review. This plan review does not include Al.ectrical or plumbing plan reviews. Electrical conce is can be directed to Washington County at 640-3470 and plumbing concerns to Mike Sheehan at the City of. Tigard at 639-4171 extension 312 . If you have any cruestions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely,,, �l� ILCO^M41.7—, Mark Burrows Plans Examiner. FAX (503) 684-7297 ab/pc112-50.doc I Uniform Building Codes Oregon Structural Specialty Code 1992 Edition, Chapter 53 COSTCO Bldg. Proposed Allowc3 Area Rt BTU Rt BTU Gross Bldg 203637. 00 0. 11 21743. 11 0. 14 28686.09 Gross Rf/C1g 158817.00 13.93 11399.91 11. 11 14293.53 c'' oss Wall 44820.00 5. 50 8156. 32 3.33 13446.00 Gross Floor 0.00 0.00 O.C'0 0.00 0.00 Ln Ft F Factor F Factor Slab Edge 1632.00 1.34 2186.88 0.58 946. 56 Area Rt BTU Rt BTU Gross Roof 158817.00 13.93 11399.91 11. 1.1 14293. 53 Type X 151047.00 29. 41 5135.91 Skylight. 6120 0. 7 4284 Smoke Vent 1650 1. 2 1980 --------------------------- ------------------------------------------ Area Rt BTU I Rt BTU CROSS WALL 44820.00 5. 50 8156. 32 I 3. 33 13446. 00 Type I 11867.00 6. 36 1864. 71 Windows 1 0.00 1.41 0.00 Doors 665.00 2.00 332 . 50 Type II 31208.00 6.70 4657 . 91 Windows 1 0.00 1. 41 0. 00 Windows II 0.00 1. 72 0. 00 Doors .1080. 00 0. 83 1.301. 20 Type III 0. 00 13. 57 0.00 Type IV 0. 00 11. 79 0.00 --------------------------- --------------------------------------- \,0 .u. wi10 . 2c° II _ l ;1220 a 16 00 — j II 260 r `oe iPoe o\o Special ConditionsiRrovisions: 1'`�` �' + IIZso '^ `b ` H �. 11 •'. ) 0 11. 55 1 - / %(b 11208 11285 11280 - ; �y 11 A °w✓/ s,., r% s� City of Tigard, Oregon, Standards and Specifications. I >-- -- 1 / b° 1. All work shall conform to C y g 9 , � , �, leDo Note the attached Drawings and Details. - ''�` `" N 300 1 r to '17 I r) N 7 (D n P 1 co 2. Notify City inspector Letha Thomas (#639-4171) 24 hours before starting any work. 3. Access-to and egress-from parcels of land adjacent to the 'Mork area shall be t a - - .#LQ ��O I 111 300 r. % � „+i.,�` � ru., I i Tee rreo• .� nee Q N rJ \ 'Q �_ f •' 2200 \ St CON '•ioer r.« maintained at all times. Pedestrian safety shall be provided fc�r by the contractor "� o �, �, j — __� — /• 1?90Ac �_ p U O 0 — \ _ �, \ ( ►....... er. 2000 I at all times. - o _ / - t I L -- "_' ) c 454C r 41 23-81 4. Removal/replacement work and damage repair work shall be prDmptly initiated and I = - ��� - ; I. , 2004 :► •I completed to the City's satisfaction. No work shall be consiclored complete until \ a �•_ right to cause testing and ) � N � � it is accepted by the City. The City reserves the ig t 9 I I D �� r irs to be erformed, to the Cit/'s satisfaction, at _ P - r certification of work o repa ti lz� c ermittee's expense. - X\ •' 5. Erosion control shall be provided for by the contra.-to r. V4 \ p I O 6. ORS 757.541-5"71 appliec (pre-notification for location of uncerground facilities, \ . _ _ 1 L� A' 4300 F �� I 7 IL �I" ; etc.). S 24.7691 0 iC.S 24.9771 7. li Is h.' sole responsibility of the permit holder to provide for proper right-of-entry 11 - I '1'�' �-�- ; o "5 25''60' ' and/or easementsprior to starting work. Proof of right-of-entry (and/or properly p -~-- I` _ _ 2 executed easements) shall be provided to the City. The City shall in no way be n ; ' 3 0 4 ° :onstrued to be liable for the permit holders failure to obtain or provide for pruof � `�, �� 1 I► � � � �� of right-of-entry or easements). � = / � 11 660 9 rY )( - r easements deemed necessary b the City, to facilitate operation, maintenance �� s °5 ` I o II I _ t, 1, S. All ea rY Y and access to new public facilities or to enable public usage of sidewalks, etc., vN� I'h 35 I w — ► I' ' J �PT 2 _> — ---� 1 shall be properly prepared, executed and p.ovided to tiie City prior to City release _ �— — I I =5 '\a 11720 of any work assurance funds and prior to City closure of the project permit. , r J I I I ------ L.,__._ a ��• � 1 T 5U AF­10JY' I ' 9 "l( N.3A be tv.l�de� for b 'SLE r_,C %4 to I' 1 I (C I I t• I 1„.- ` \ l rz � Cove s � y � �c t' . � I 4400 / necessary, shall be - � 10. Utility relocations, modifications or repairs, which may be ry I - 70A` I 1 \ \ I x performed in a timely manner at the permittee's expense. —^_ — t PT TRACT •[ 'T J _ � I 4200 ,.o. •�, 1 N 11845 ~Is50 I \ 1 �.h , - 1pAC •f�, 4 4 I t 3: ,I d 7O 1 I \ i A sr.e MAP Iru...o. di/spec-con.sop — I :ofl Dartmouth Street car I I' I 7855 SW Dartmouth street r�, I + _ 1 of 1 C 1 I 7855 SW Dartmouth Street II ..4*610"4.*Wn. .t, w. r„ ....+c1Ygr^•ek•.r•.a.,ah2 of 10 -_ •�� _r II I 08/20/96 INCH MAO[0 CH" J �I I�I�{�I�I�f�l � ����������►���� I�I�Ili�l�l�l � I�I�l�l�l�l�l ! I�I�I�i�l�l�l � I �I�I�i�l�i�l � I�l ��(I�l�l�l � I�Ill�l�l�l�l�f � I�I�I�I�I(I�I I�I�Ijl�l�l�i� I�illllllillllliiii Illlllllllllnlinllir'illiljl iullitii�iiulinil�ni�Ililliiiillililililluilliin�l�illiui�uulim Iii1111nlllllllllllilillllli►Ilnlnlllili�ll!ulnulllll�lllllllllllllllllll ilnhulllnihnl imlmibniliuiluubul mlln�l nilllin ul�btu�fllllnu�i WWII OF r T ' -7.F1'•+'". __—- -- _ - - —_ AYr�rkrpr tlYM11Mtr.�tM .Ilr,r,or.M..w•+r.w.rwv. rr.y. s+a,r� CURB JOINT - GENERAL NOTES 5' MIN. --- - ,�.. SCE NOTE 5 ROW 3/4' k 6` - EDGE I. TRAFFIC SIGNS TO BE 48" X 48" t•k .M !..- �- •� - I ��_ p �►+ p BLACK ON UR ANGE. ROA - T _ I } 2 NO COLLECTOR STREET LANE CLOSURES _'I`.. _ � '-, - I " • t 100' 5 -- ,_---- DRAINAGE BLOCKOUT MIN OR LOCAL STREET CLOSURES DURING I G" THE FOLLOWING TIME PERIODS: 2' Of )/4"-0' i�ASEf�tOCh �- ���• �' PIPE DW/COUPLING 01i '-'"■L PLASTIC "' p COMPACTED SUBGRADE --�, + PUNNING 1 7: 30 -- 8: 30 A.M. • 100' 4: 30 •- 5: 30 P.M. r7o e � 16 MIN, SURVEYING SIDEWALK A A T 4 ��� a • 6 3. 'THE CITY'S STANDARD SPECIFICATION AD T 1 0 CURS o _, FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL IS "MANUAL Q o o q I a ENGINEERINCr ' ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL ---- 5' MIN ------- � 0 o � 2 100' ; ROW C Ml�v. ( DEVICES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS", UNDSCAI]Ei ~—+►1 `''' -- n 0 `Jo 4 a ° ` 1 - I FHUADEPT. 1988 EDl ON TRANSPORTATION, AWHITECTURE 411101— 2% - Llsass S.W. NIMBUS Av■tvi.c :r P.O. BOX ON40 ROAD1-7J, — - 9» tY 1 I 4. ACTUAL SIGN PLACEMENT TO BE I'"1•'T�b• OREGON 97280 _ (bos) 024-04" MIN. ■ ADJUSTED IN FIELD. DO NOT REDUCE Fax: (6(19) 625-w"b SEE NUTS r= ^;_� jl ._____ _�{ a -0' MIN. BELOW MINIMUMS WITHOUT CITY :_2 APPROVAL. z' OF 3/4"-o• BASERocK TRAVER'3E EXPANSION JOINTS: 12' _ COMPACTED SUBGRADE w _ ■■ �~ - 5. THE CITY RESERVES THE. RIGHT TO ADD TO 1. TO BE PRO�iDEG AT EACH POINT OF a OR MODIFY TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS SIDEWALK AWAY FROM CURB TANGENCY OF THE CURB & AT OTHER 100 z 0 NOTES. LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED TO LIMIT THE f MIN. 0 AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO EFFECTIVELY f iJ SPACING 'TO A MAXIMUM OF 20 FT, ■ LO CuNTROL TRAFFIC AND TO ENSURE PUBLIC (� FLAGGE_R ■ I u SAFE TY. C`) 1. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 P.S.I. AFTER 28 DAYS, 6 SACK MIX, SLUMP RANGE 2 MATERIAL TO BE PRE-MOLDED NON- � Ii 0 Q 6. NO LANE CLOSURES WITHIN 200 FEET OF OF 1 -1/2" TO 3"' EXTRUDED MATERIAL WITH A MINIMUM 100' � A TRAFFIC SIGNAL H THICKNESS OF 1/2 AL WIT OUT PRIOR CITY 2. PANELS TO BE � FEET SON;;. MIN, 0 APPROVAL. Z 3. EXP.%NS!0'v JOINTS TO BE PLACED AT SIDES OF DRIVEWAY APPROACHES, TRAVERSE. CONTRACTION JOINTS: p UTILITY VAULTS, WHEELCHAIR RAMPS, & AT SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 45 FEET. I 100' 1. SPACING TO 8E NOT MORE THAN 10 FT. MIN. LEGEND 4. FOR SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE CURB AND POURED AT THE SAME TIME AS THE 2DEPTH OF THE JOINT SHALL BE AT CURB, THE JOINT BETWEEN THEM SHALL BE A TROWELED JOINT WITH A MIN. 1/2 RADIUS. LEAST ONE FOURTH OF THE CROSS- p aw w1wLqw AO S. SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 6 INCHES IF MOUNTABLE SECTIONAL AREA. �t Q TRAFFIC SIGN 1 OG' CURB IS USED OR IF SIDEWALK IS INTENDED AS PORTION OF DRIVEWAY. CONCRETE BREAKING STRENGTH: MIN. ® CONSTRUCTION ZONE OTHERWISE SIDEWALK ,,HALL HAVE A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 4 INCHES. I p 1 RW Go"MI:Tk* ■ TRAFFIC CONES OR 6. DRAIN BLuCk.oL;T; IN CURES SHALL 9E EXTENDED TO BACK OF SIDEWALK 'yITH 3" glAhVf TER aHc.o APPROPRIATE DELINEATION PLASTIC PIr E AT 2% SLOPE. CONTRACTION JOINT TO BE PLACED OVrFR PI 'E 1. TO RE 3000 P.S.I. AFTER 28 DAYS. DEVICE CONCRETE SIDEWALK STAN '` TRAFFIC CONTROL_ Al DARD CURB �v U I wl_ _ , TYPICAL DETAIL L�.J "f r;r;.'y• ; APPROVED P ?RAWN kir REi'F_RENCF APPROVED BY DRAWN B'Y `' --^" •�� CITY 0;- TI GARD "� " REFERENCE APPr+CVED E), �— OkA14N F �" AFS C1 TY OF TI GAR! WA`.�I M CITY OF TI GARD CAB q 1 nA't : W(, c ll E 4l F L)ATF. f)*G FILE �rAIE �' T DWG FILE OREGON i D_ T�_ONC—S�WOM, OREGON —y-�s J OEIAILS\CURB-STD.Dw, OREGON , .,, �•✓ J J•DFT/1RAFL'CNdt.DWG C"'1 r 0 I.� CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1 ALL CONCRE7E PAVEMENT SHALL BE REMOVED TO THE EXISTING JOIN I L!NFS. ` _r, C) 2 REMOVt- EXISTING CURB & SA WCUT PAVEMENT TO A CLEAN EDGE. PAVEMENT SHALL BE PLACED TO THE LINES, GRADES, AND REQUIREMENTS PER THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION. PAVEMENT TO BE 3" CL. 'C' ON 8" / \ \ OF 314--0- CRUSHED ROCK. I'll \\ \ REMOVE BROKEN CONCRETE WALK AND DRIVEWAY APRON T THE'HL NEAREST JOINT BY SAWCUTTING. REPLACE IN-KIND PER ORIGINAL. C 0 -- �'� �-�• r� F C.7�: C 0 N S T'R U C'i'i O N a P P R�,, �/ _ r �. I G A R D Plot, Dace: 10-20- 9 Design: IRM tta!1 t :�___ �______. �- ) cJ � �JI�� DrtAwn: TGD'1MCL 9h' o Checked: -_-- BY R � NEW CURr3 ; �, / ` Revisions: -i Q • . E/�/� . . . ..`t K •fir r*►`" ___`_.....-_—._�—.�_ .__....�.� ni ,t �n(G.CURB. , � . BEGIN NEW WORK AT R/W p�o�`` ` I ! j I ! ► SCALE � ti � -, cv t ) I 20 0 10 20 40 g(� �` EXP. 12/31/9f _- 3 Slier I... Numbs+r ch 20 ft. OF a,_....,..�r..,.... .. •..,...., 08/20/96 ��II � I� ' lllllll I�ill( I� IIIII I IIIIIII+IIIII I IIIIII�+IIIIIII IIIIIII�IIIII I IIIIlII� IIIII I �III �IIi �! III? i IlI;!IIIIIIII IIIIIiIJill 1II!II I IIIIIII1IItIIII I IIIII�IIIIIII IIIIIII�IIIIII I INCH I MAGE IN CHINA L i�!i!ISI!TIIIiIIIIIiI!li!iliillil!!!il!I!ilii!!'liinl!!!!I!ILII!!III!!I!IIIIiI,I�II In!!I!Ili�l nll�i!I�!I! IIIIIII!IIIiII!—I!IIIIIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIII!II!(!Ili li!IIUIIIIIIIIII!Illi!I !IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII4 - , 777 I I.le� F 1 f2 11`/02A J T- 4A b /ylOA i `SA+'I SIT�IRY fTt', J r 4LU, 91 r EL�1.TPac. 1kL.1- yl I r ro ., S-•r�',� I s'-o o.�iIJE :.]c 1'�+t�.arw� (w r'.-.� ��_---_ --_�-�•-- - --- -"---� I - I i _ 1� � ,4►�rJe-e.ca¢c�la►.I� nIPII�cA � ac II.,STAL;..ILp 7° 4 I I \ i=1.-L• tii=D WL> MJD/oIt hGci�P.Ah►J.B W N 21 r11uIr11x1 To _-•� ` AT S'-c owrMiO>C R0r- K.,H I.-�1�' aJ,-Src TaAE-�r jwwrllAvxP4o alb TD Im ao$,At ISY ?TM(aS 1 (� �1.1E MJ ,. .z�. FDL c 1 \ WA F l .. ...� .J lQF0Kt✓1 ATIOQ cx cul ( �7---- I - - - __._ -� 5rAT I - 104 PSI *N 4 vR+P ( ftS51 DUAL- 16 PSI _—___._-.._..�.---- ------ _ � � I �� 11 c, L<�arwr.l DA,zTrw�►r►•1 RD .a ra>tw Fi-�M.! avots avr� ��t) Iz_ - c.o�•Tcv ..oe. sP[.-+�t..srrtv��� FIG 220 Qlii('T'^,LAMA' qo. I c ti ►agfTlJpWu FIG 213 QUICK FND' MER f7HN EFn NO I PIS tC](TAL 1 Q111C1(V T9 FKi 2bd�FCX1R WAV .+1 SEtWIC mµ1 SYSF'M _ UNCUP*W 111 LABORATORIES LLSI[ I fop SCHxc cp «)AND a SPACE�+P BASIC ASSEMOLY USE 2QU ICKCIAMP LAIC A :K ENb 1 AND LZL KXIENo ANO A uCA IN CINE BRIM 2�� ASSEMBLIES T i I 011 A vI[11�Q�IIGc IAB (QLRCK'Ab NOT SHUwN) TK VETAILS 0FLOW QU1CA END LONGITUDINAL I _ c 04O'W HOW'Cl NATE 1001 ORALE hKi 2 -- rA EN THE PARTE OMENTATION - PNOPEAIY QUICK CLAMP iWR WAY l I I -- HEFtNtE-�`�* I I LoasE ��GAP \ TIONT i TIGHT NO tlAP - TOOD, - - Qll�(aAMP i t ISR TWO QUICI(ENDS w[ y firm. M�l UPJ A O:'!-:K CLAMP AND A (B LRS FT) fhRs TDI K:1/ �,Ull h r�rVN WAY ,\ I MI PM MA DWN[ vt_NTJRA CAL IFORNIA 930117 4W)(AA%y H !,4)5)644-7576 Fir ` 1 I 1 S I 1 I _ I 4 „ ."-1141.►...�E R Fes,•.'(_3 .. _ - � - - -- -•--7 � , '� i 1 up T.J'�y I I I I ��'/9 '►..,ten ��.lA'�� I a �Q 13KAC_.F C�TAI 1__ r � I I � 1 TYA14pIa,(.e� SEAM M�T7AAr szooF IWW 1 _ L TRuSy.Fi FICAMF�p IIJT: STFJeA. \ I � 411R,D�R.S. R 19 11u Sul.AlTloh7. I __SIR K. uI4E6T'(f'• �pRINKLfiR. MNF.I TvP, "•�. ..'���"�.L �,I _. / 7 R11wNT SPIEtr1wER IIPIO I LRAPT SAor Tfh: \ Imo. \• : / r100, oL-VMN YYP. \ I•Rrxrra+. ( r w+e oN aEwr��--.._ _ \ '\ _ v� �Ir'-Li-�An,,,1 _ --, v(�c?oRT4Wec�V�� i .._ruxTr1WT1) SAD E _ r /J j �•'- - . \� n►-,.1�� � -``'moo.` � ��'�' "'� �. �.i �J�It°r�f��r1h��� � I AKTIAL LfZOSS SEC-T10N4 �cs.ur: YID' = IL•' ,I j - -_.. _•_ _. - � , ..- / TUALATIN YALLEV FIRE MAR6NK OFFI6E •� � _/�� APi�RCYVED . . . . / S I ��� CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. . . . . . 4 ' 5-4AZ 1'140'-o" APPROVAL O Puna IS NOT AN APPROVAL OP oMISOM OVERSIGHTS. SE TT D LETTEFI PL N:1 E AMI q T II �JULl 4 1994 FIRE MARSHAL'S OffICE ��G�,,l"mt�k wa.Ee.v e(_a_►uol�a_� .Sf r�l��' Ir►.lu�- -- �1. �c 64td�, �.C,r�k CONTRACT NAME �-C>517� 0 W HO Lr-'�AL-E 7t>,57 �svV r�C11ZTT/Aca.IT>f► tZD. T7 U�it.D,oIL CONTRACT WITH 1�1hJSQl.1 C1�I•J511-ILTIO►.I ZJ3laL� ti w.CdZA,LI.I.. RD 7855 SW pertmouth Street HILI-SPi�id3,G�1L a112�-9Si l l Sol) l04s'�*?'%I 1 C1».IT'N T ' {7�,,.'LI'-e HILLS .fob P'NotJC: ;10)%) Su Pr 5 of 10 SPRINKLER LEGEND DESIGN CRI I[;IA AND NOTES HANGER LEGEND SPRINKLERS USED REVISIONS GENERAL NOTES _ --�. Fti-1►'IE stems West A "U" NOOK TM _ — --. — SPRINKLER rF.E t, TYPE MFG/MODEL SIZE TEMP, FINISH CANOPY DUAN MK DATE By - -._,- MACHINE THREADED ROD SPKR UPPANDIDOWN SYF', _._ - - -- --- I ALL MATERIAL ANDEOUIPMENITOBENEWANDUI�DERWRITERSAPPROVED 600 S.E. MARITIME AVE., I1t300 B COACH SCREW ROD N TOGGLE NUT _-- tHRDs ORIFICE STIES UPRIGHT SIZE _• _ _____. ^ -- -- 7 SHOWN THUSI 11-6)ARE WHICH ARE END R TO 10 ENDNTER (206) RISER 6 DIMENSIONS VANCOUVER, 99 98681 AND TYPE / \ C "C" CLAMP P POWDER ORIVI:N STUD �� L1EfNIN[; OPENI►1G -- --- — 3 EARTHQUAKE BRACING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA (206) 693-9906 117 UP SYMBOL DOWN PA.IAPHLET NO t7 D TOP BEAM CLAMP R WEDGE AN%1HOR -� 7 SPRAY - - - - — - ^ 4 PIPE HANGERS AND METHOD OF HANGING TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ? 16 16 1 1 1,2 0 ___ / \ NFPA PAMPHLET NO 13 wA $1 p7Nrn uC 40 FIRE SWI 11081 I E EYE ROD _ _ T 5 PIPING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA PAMPHLET NO 13 -- ----- - '- -' APPROVALS REQUIRED DISTRIBUTION IF FL:ISH SHELL U _ v4 ' ® 1 1 _ —__ _ -- - - -- - - 37 SPRAY r e JOINING OF PIPE AND FITTINGS. THREADED AND !".'CEDED SHALL BE IN WAlIT�' CONTRCI BY DA`L 1UALrgTIAI LIA11C1 Flip�RE'*�Jlr T,LAIATI)VV 1 EY PhR I ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA PAMPHLET NO 13 APPROVED FOR FABRICATION BY OATf G CEILING FLANGE V i--_ -- ° - I 1 1 N SIDE_BEAM BRACKET W i —_, ) Q 1/7 1,2 I'7 a.11>E1LJ hRr�1 ;,MIAICQ ARC-N S 7 FnEEZI TO PROVIDE APROTECT HEAT TA PREVENT WATER IN PIPES FROM — - FREEIIN,3 IN AREAS PROTECTED BY A WET PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTEM APPROVED FOR INSTAII/�TION BY DAT[ 16 1 SIDEWALL a 1 - 16g• _- FY+V.I y 1 6 STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY OF THE BUILDING TO SUPPORT THE SPRINKLER — "�" BOLT - X TEMP 711, PIPING IS THE RESPONSIBILII"Y OF THE OWNER AND/OR HIS STRUCTURAL -- f N 1ct_ i2.4R'TnY 7/7 '. Z_ i OF�o REPRESENTATIVE DESIGME L)ATE108 NO. K SHORT CLIP Y 1 DRY TYPE RATING 1�' TOTAL THIS SHEET -1eYrA,L 1 "� D 1 Iso „1 08/20/90 111j111�111�!11 Iji111{�11111 11111111111111 1 !1111Jill I11111'1111111jIIIII 1 11IN1111111 1 1j11111I111j! 1 11111j1j11111 111111�II11111 11111111�111�111 I (jllll!1111�1 111111111111 'r INCH I�MADf IN CHt11A — � -��-, ---�-- T�T� �� . III 111111111111111111 IIIIIIInIIIIIIIIIIInllllllltlllllllll uIIIIInIIIIIIInIIIIIiIinllllnhlllflllllllllllnllllllllnlllllhlliii111111111111111 111(1111111111111111111111111111111I111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ' 1a1111111111111111111111111111111111111111illlll 111i1;' I 1 1 �I $0D 4 rpt/4.NOSI[; 1 ----- - �JIy.L. I1D (�L��� 2 L-6p I , l� t•''ry !! /L c lv " u WS ,�^� `J i ti 1 L- ,_ Zco� AFQ3 �u� Zt o 'rawy 'W , +so �1� ..�'•' �" 'r--'T' l7 w+yl �•��•i' ^(I�.��rt""'� 2'-1-n ti-o -tl-� I y z.-a _ tl o _ tl-o ♦ `( _ Z. t. tr I � Z ,.+E "L Z1=�lE� Zar-.►E 1. 1 M L L lei_t (yl� 1°• In-n 1?. 1.. 10-r.,, 2 'I- , 3--� (a-it 'LK i4-p ZI- i,�•C7 1-4' Z'$ '>; lv (c�-/� ✓t '1� �" �° p � 1. �{ r A 1 V 3..Wc1y A r A v. It a. h 4 a kn ° d D +UI) 1.a '`''/ 1 AF.0 ���n C-D f I 1 rrIV "1. +21wi 4-Ilk ---(� N_ II,494 1,o nArFFc-O^ N to P Ihir i I r—10 E�41- 717ItIL W-L-I. . �I C1x iFlk.it7Z- Y v1 I I I i I -� \' - �• p M � 1 19 t Z Z F -_ _ ,t 0 P•y I ! , w t Itb' / ot"IG►� '.TU � r L 1 � 2 I � d• h`I ,' f oC .�11tA � � 14 1 i / L I, I 1 , I I f ( I i o p, t-� tlt Coo I L.orJ I�tDI r �, 4 l y bc�3 z I J :1 1 T "� DI��:1 N N rd 12 Z i _ I 14, I -&H i -#-ft ra►1��ID1cAT�---..,._ A d o d i 1 S�I�� GIl OF •-a a-$ w-a I Iiry la-o „ P, (>,IC*1 F07'1 _0 J 1 f Q V ISG I t ( 1 I I G[x�I,FY PPPL.Oy.I II I I4�cr q.� n.0 �lo-O I C1iRCtcVAr.UE(To.:I4'r.'► ` - - I I I 4-� s-t� 1 1 L I &%ra GIwvV� akJ`1 AL-ARJ-"i VAI-41C IQ TR N� r StkEa.. VA iC'CT.o,-.IT.'t'1 (To I � _L_......_.. -�, 1 i ,Na511t VK 9qn. � (1 I I QQ I I I ^,� I I 1 � '""�" T' � ► v `r IS'-o .11FF t nx�I A it I. I Z 1 I I , ; Qti/ I I ti" �TTF�i-1 i, t z I I,# , VA"VC W1T)IrAPCC_ l01 rJ/'nW1F 111 �[>---� ri ( I I (r 1 ,11 io q� r 0-6) Iv-o (, I , L1�1►.L ' , I I I I �° ,-.- I i 1 - o•je, I Exp ' ' 1 i � �'13 2-o O z f. 10 t` 1 , FY- i �. I i I I 1 1 �Pvw a 1 .Y }1 � (, 1' ' I I I I I I 1 114 Cth 1 _ _ b 1 j Q 10- 9-4 1n 10-O — 1 a I C! I r, ��' n* � I I I i I i i i i. I I I I I i Qti i 1 IYt ry'rJtr� Fv�13vr� O�ftODYi�• 8'r,��''1 FSwI ch1Ec.K. VAl Ji. V C(T C. IZ'L z :.+iEc Aw 1 I A 1*' `� ` I ItG.rp N II o-!� ' I lo•O 11-4 N' 10-0? 11)0-0 I I _ 0 I S g a I 'r I I I I 1 ( JI I �b 1T7D� �I .' 0.6 I ! I v c. - In good 810. t I I I I , I l I ..F IL P�TIR r ! 4�` 4t� I I � � I 1 �, � e I ,� m �✓' 14 i't *, 17• n, I i i I I i ,� I (� 345 L �IMAt`!p AT �c?��l P I 1 2��1G L: 1525 G11rM /�. Sf.9 P51 ` n Q 4 � V ' I ' 1 I I ( ( I 1 0 I I � Zrr.►E _, . {.[..� „lar✓t f"_. .4, P>I Ili 117- -1-4 IL I 1 -1-4 10 9 'T z o � i iQti d. I .L " I I t I'd 14 i i j - -- -- - �' _'� ,/.9 (1 � � i I � � � I � I r U � I '�'�l�F.�r11JT � W�K1aL�R..'� .t- • r � :. ,,,,.. IK / t JI 2 1 t 2; t i I "E !� �:jq� 11h 0 1 14 n I ...} „ r.� 9 �aT �� v ! lo- to-6 b-Lo _ _ 1 y n- Q a H R /l IL i .A IL R2 I t3rD E yy nt " i' 10,1� • 1 MFti414« `�tO �tL � IiJ . . _ _ _ ___ � _. _..--.. _._. �- __ — --- -- _... � ..__- -- _ �,� "r�L -_ ` ( I '�, ryZ JtA T' R. 'VIv N.�Cc- L" . a.wLIvC I1"NM`f}; (D _ s � -os -C�o oo- Z�- '� ' I'L. Z- L41 t, � 2!1" -Ta 4.' MAI,•J «. r_ �1. L L z z z 2 z z , L IV 9-� c i n ( C�Ar Iu r-� I,� —7-_ y �.� R lo-o to-o ro- „ lo- I<�-o lu-n Q ` r I�L 10. h 4 o r II. F a -A 114 I I I� z Z L '- 1 9-4 „ I�-c" 10-0 1-� iIL 10-0 n h rt cl � el ,y'. Ah I I�.0 1.4 / bolo I,L 5 d� irill _ t "S 1 I to-G) � �-� \ A 4v -z-ow i L t71R 1 I t\p p 4 A G 50D h� zZ q I I I 1 4 I't -G L L L t "1- L 1- L Z Z Z 2 .,t t Z L 1 b 1,❑ >_ .� .__.._.- 1n-/) 9-9 r. 100 1(s-.r -rr lo•O to-rl In•O I°-CO I,1•�� I,�-.) h Ir�•r� Y^ In• 11 10^111 10-h 4 -� ID-,., n 1P 4t, � 19 d�13 v I a 0 A n ., n. J, ♦ S -Q �� /•V � Y 1 � TSob Rryt� Kn� Ko13 �� 1 --rrw� .�� ��� �. tr - VI�sM�1 ir/�. �•I Z_ 'T I © -��� err �� i �I� .1��� m�� �� �� w�� �� �r� �� ��� r� 1r.� �s �r� �� s -�--• {, / ✓ MATcNLI Qlz SEC St4T+k 4 u� T, � 1�•FJ>v � la ,r• r- � '� tE----- Rf's.TA1•--1c Q- r i s>,rr+ ` /LAL -_-- NOTE31v TRAIT AAME 1) All gr„ovvcl couplings to be rigid type unless noted CC)STCG \'�IHV A�-4=- E•----- Wt., �.T R T., of h rs r Wt so. I tza«ai. t-Iq,Jt,.�E! 7!!9y SVJ i7nRT-Ma1r'►'1t f�•D. � I�I �I ^,�� 2) All earthquake bracing to be bolted to structure with 1/2” -IeAARD M L- L-.C�C�`1 boots. Connections to joi+e� to be made on top card only. E: 116 �I '-o" 3) FC = light weight iioxible coupli:ig. 4) All. fine halngeto to I "h" type U.N.O. 'S) A) ] arm-ovrrr� to be 1 % 0' -fr" U.N.O. CONTRACT WITH �I 2aBI�Jso►�J ��TRUcTIo1..� zl�o0 Illi v1 CoeNA-L•-. Izp Hit-L-53090,M 111.112.4•g1r1 I I'NDIJer. (Sail te4S'-0531 co,.lrr.�"I-: 15,.�1ut MtuS 7855 SW Dartmouth Street A�C.`t�1' T Y�� 106 Plid►lE:(5v�)°Irn13 2�1 tJirf: h1A,W:. rJ c i.f AwIG r,of 10 HANGER LEGEND _ SPRINKLER LEGEND SPRINKLERS USED _ REVISIONS ~! GENERAL NOTES - Y— - - DESIGN rRITERIA AMO NOTES _ fire Systems West 0 "U" HOOK M MACHINE tHPEADEO R00 SPRINKLERS SVM. TYPE MFG,'MOC' SIZE TEMP. FINISH CANOPY O_UAN MK f:ATE By _ SPRINKLER TEE UP AND DOWN -- e t ALL MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT TO BE NEW ANL)UNDERWRII ERS APPROVED 6UO S E MARITIME AVE., tM300 4­-COACH --- SPKR U e1.o rEltTltllL_ Ew :11 :I Zt3b Maz. N/A 374 %� 1 ) A. Sprinkler mains 6" and larger to be Schedule 10 Lightwell . SCREW ROD N TOGGLE NUT ORIFICE SIZES UPRIC)1•rT SITE _ �_ -. - --- - 2 PIPING DIMENSIONS ARE CENTER TO CENTER EXCEPT RISEN a DIMENSIONS VA►J(.Ol1VEFl, WA 9Ae61 THRDS 11 o SHOWN P. Sprinkler mains and line` '" to 4" to be All Super F1 AND TYPE ISM SSP (.F_M ItJT1=�MCC�IRTF Vill 6RE HkR(� Z ^ (206) 693-9906 C "C" CLAMP - P WDER DRIVEN STUD _ oFENR�r.; oPENINc; � -- -- 3 EARTHQUAKE BRACING SNAIL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA [' D TOP BEAM CLAMP R WEDGE ANCHOR 1!7 UP ,Y11ASpl DWI,! L.K_vF_L p'1gG H F HANGING T BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2 be Allied i+sd p r AC ' PAMPHLET NO t� C. Sprinkler lines 1 1/2" and sinal 1 er u e 1 3• L SPRAr �<w GE*A ISSUfr 1 �Q-13 t/L' baa' gQZ Hff0v(AU 7 _ -._ A PIPE HANGERS AND METHOD O ANG NG O T r ) System design dens i t i e� ar d e� fol t o' rM 0 t -- -- E &E ROE) T - 16 i� 1 - t� I 1,2 ', I © -- - _ NFPA PAMPHLET NO t� .495 G /2,00 S F ~Rr - � - - RIr.K"l APPROVALS�UIRED DISTRIBUTION 5 PIPING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 11AMPHLET NO ,. A. I hire! Main A. 40 3pg Fro f: q• .. It crsr„ LK no FIAF SwI I T v� I 12 _ B. Tire Sales: .40 (iPM/2,')Or) Sc'. Ft. /� r FLUSH SHELL U _- _ ;- j7 SPRAY •---- -------- a JOINING OF PIPE AND FITTINGS THREADED AND WELUIZ0 SHALL BE IN 1/Entire? Cooler QRJALIT'l CONTROL SY G CEILING FLANGE V A L' C I I --�t-- I _ _ TV FIZX 9CSW%L T V. FII it Pn.-ii a ACCORDANCE WrTH NFPA PAMPNLEI NO t� L, Bakery and Most Area: •zrl&3 Ent i retire er Rtr;er - 1/7 1'2 li' 1'? OwUt .IJ�� ONS -- S OWNER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE HEAT TO PREVENT WATER IN PIPES FROM p. Large Freezer and > ool er s AP►ROYr� FOR FABIIICATIG*1 SY ATE H SIDE BEAM BRACKET W -__ 2 1 SIDEwALI Q - - - FREEZING IN AREAS PROTECTED BY A WET PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTEM E• Office Ar ea t 10 r3PM/1,'511'1 so, Ft. APM"In FnR IN!TALLATION BY DATE 16S' - - � ! STRUCTURAL IS THE EESPONSiB1QUACY 0L�i Y OF THE OWNER AND/OR HIS STRUNG TO SUPPORT THE CTURAL F. Entrance r anr_a Canopy t 1 O aPO M11,9!JO Sq• Ft pESIGNER DATE 1UB N0._ T ;_• ..�" BOLT X -_-_ - - TEMP 212 - PIPING . . K SHORT rLIP V - ---- _ 1 DRY r.PE '- RATING 2aa' — - - — REPRESENTATIVE a►llJ�1�iPjlroY �/ 94 13)�- Z OF LO TOTAL THIS "FT 08/20/96 lil'1'I�I Iii II�IEII�I�llllil I iil�i�l�i�iii I I�I�I�II!�I�I�I i;iii�ll,I�lil I li�i!�III��iI I I;I��il�l�i�ll!�I��i►����i�i► i�li�iiil�l�lihLQ �i�i-i-���Iii—l�i�l � Iilil�iililll Iili�illlililk . I Ililill IIII!IIII IIIIiIiIIIIIIIiIIIIIAIIillll Illlilllllllllilllllllllililllllllillll'IIIIiIIIIIII IIiIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIII ILlilllllllillllll IIIiIIII IIIII�I I II IIIII�IIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIU!IIIIII!Ililllllllllil'II Illlilllllllllilllllllliillllllll!illlllnlllnlllllrhlll►nnl,llllllnllnlllnlllllllill� ter.... 77 ' I a Y4'-c, S -<= vn •v •y t, A_� 1� ,A.1 (2,40 e +L'T'tti•sn�} _ - tl`fi..k.S; 1 <4'l0� •T '�T4,,+'•� iSr I RA-D - Y �: p �, t 0. _ 1" - d A I +n v z 7 4. N L a n tt,Z �' 0. `^ r� r z 3.. _ t L z IP nl--" Ivo 10 ,, 0'O 10.0 t g00 " 4"Irta•aE VA1>,IE i n i P.�L7 G �� I B �•AFP I I I I 1t - =�lr- 1 �-- n to Ilti ILS I s I 1 I Q~ O ! t__- ILL �, t t ' I I i ' ' Ivo '1-4 g Iy •, t I 7t ,", r �1 � I � 1 � ' A ARF- ✓ °Rtit'A a1 _O � I I � � i � 1 ' I � � V+� I p � I ! I � I I �' ^1� ,,\ d � P 5. 4�' PRAE:A+� YvaTt H. (L•ni /Llt� dill C I I Ei :p'_ArtM� ' 1 4 i I ; I j ' I 1 I I i 1 •s. ? 11 M no G r>ar' PII a I , I I I I I I I rt" � �. �so•sl IL -- il4 1 I IA cl 9-4 ,•>-c„ �- r1At-.J� wrrH -T{2.II•✓a . I ,•.r.. : 15".� � 1.4 S' li I q N,o1i 1loDl ( ' I I I I I I I I I i / ,�R,,r JC- 11n- SV_F+--Y vA-_0FL M �� i 9 Y , I I � `�'- I I I I L � I ! I 1 �.° 1 I I �'� � t i 1 /��G''/ � '•� � v vJfT-M ,►aMP�rZ 3W t'Y"c.p� 0 ( +4- 0 OHr , � T1 I I I '0.4 � I I I I I I o 4 ISO / a. I o_ i� a ' o " a a_ I i I ! j ! I I z` 1 t A�W In v'J I Z I t I Z 1- z I I I 1 I I I I -I lor,_> q-4 �. 1 A- q- I .y1 0- It>-q I< -ca I I ' r I I L, I 1't /� 9 ' I v I I I I I ( -� I f I I+ItZ 5•+:r'l Y P f2c,N� S .r A?Ar_rTY ��_ ._ _ I' I `� I 4A v�A"T' AIR eo PstCc-S ..Z vIF ' ANL• 150 GA4. -'' 4' I ti` tti Q / - r I 1 (' I M 1►. __ 1� k-^-* 1 �,W�t>F ----Z--�- it I I I I ty I t1 1 T' 1 p N (L I i N tL I v+ n 0. M I I fi , ( 11 L I I t t 'L t. 1 1. W S`(53�FM �t�rnAt,D r L'. L 1 { 1 -Mh r �,SICR -<? I Ir', r) i13 -� d-•1'� In q-O v. Ip-O I 1 1 li � i I ! � it I � i -- I I' ,'A71LrN► ti I � � 1 Cr 0 i ! I i 1 I I� I i I r— 't '1 /r I I \ I tti I (�'I�a ETAIL_ I VI ) 1 �• 11 I ^^ o I I 1 I ' t! i I ' I 1 0. w �` 'l n L �. I z. 1. 14 t.E : :i°, ' 114 I ILLI f- L I ti 'L 2 2 LW i I t I I r r, 10•f? 10-0 r,r o 10—o'l , v-r, Ir, 1 1�� I I I , I I r I 4 I I I n t to t.16 o 't-O ' { I ' I 1 , I , ( All 0/ I I I r I I L I I Q N Q n I I I '1'Q II► / I' t (1 !V1 IL I ti vt i 1 I i t' 1 ( I t 1 ' ~- I- _ 14 p •1-4 h 1-n Q -Q , IC-U I -p 10-0 I i f.1 3 I _p I Co O } SIC I _ Y r I _ � ' '9 I I � ' , i I � ` I I I ► '� I a'? 43 q_�- 0 114 - 1A ,I'4 I't ' I �' ->," ; I I � I I � I I 1 � ` I � 1 P� I I p Q , d 00 S 1 II I L I I I I I A — _ _ _ _ _y$-r0 _ _ _...2-J2 , TRIL Ir,4TA,_w"-tJ 3 NI -le+�- Z 0 -- /- � - 10 In S �� 0 + I Q'S' A• &AFF' 3 I14 it i- --1__J I �A , vi et +n 0. V1 R vl d n ,n• 1� V% t, O`_ i ,. N -L fi d T 1. -e, I 04 ,I _ � 0 _ Ih-O 9-� In-C1 Io-o; A ES .r U 1 �. t q-n [q-<? -L7 ICf-p I I 1 ( r yr V1 / 1'yl1) r P03 gob - 1iu1� (i IFS ► n'" too I Icwl- Ij a 0 f 0 �.- - - 1/•0 arr Q n 2 N it v n A Q N Q V1 Q d N t 1 v' I'ti- ' C- 2 L tee, t. -+_ t s z .�t L t t. -t L L- J I Fy --�--- � I q-QS 9'1 N 10-d !� Q 'r 10-a 10 r> 10dh -L� j 4F 4FIt�-O In-O 10-0 I �-, „ , 7 IU-O 10-0 ID-tb - � L t3 q--a} In oo ✓, to-ta � IY�-tom L.• . "� � 1 I � ra I 9 / I — I 314 9 4 c� f o U-4 I 1 rrl I Pxsr am a V— • P5 1 r ^4 °c J ' (Q I 2�L wti , � r, z q• 1 td � �--�-� o�4 � �, 5© 5 Its 5 113 .A ft n n f n a VI Q r I I 1 n ° r n n i. ->r i IIA IIS !� L Z Z �_ Z L t I r r ,� , ,, I.,_,N �� o' '(D li+ to - , 11�}_ -4 a Ql Z -J -"'Gta Q f-ro o-o ,.e n o o-t? I fD•!� " e+ _51+x- - _ Z-�1 fA- - P P \r V J l L �- ri r . 1 lo-r� I/n.Q� ICi-O lig-•^ Imo- Ir'- +� R'la Y `� gtt j1I 2t 11, 1 _._ 1 + tj UF_ •�� .w... s. w"� ��. ..err �....� ..rr_� �....rA� r�.� i� �� �� ��. .ter r r_w� ir•"r M" r♦��f 1�� 1"��� err .�.. .�� �s�rf �� r��r� r� ��. wwr.. ra�r.•- ` r1ATGNL,�� SCk' S►JT 41� 1' �.�t� Q 1-v i•� ►.ID SCAL _._-- r _v..------ �,. Trrt` P,E-/>,1'-\ rt_A!•^1~ Rt7r.�i htr_C.1L. � u V I11�. APJC�4 - - -... TM IS AWCA As H`'P AN1-I W1_Y vs� %T'!@:EL_ T'rz.t14•, I DE6JJI %e e)r- 40 DEUU F CONTRACT NAMf _ �--.___ a/6 ATR Tu HNT i W�NEft•.. 4-----• �st-EF.� Tltu�•�_, J'VE'>L ?�OS4 FT C�/..� I CO `v�H01.._.�SAL__� ..._.+.-..........- 71�Sr's <n V•J. OA rt TM 0.I T H R._D. Tll�r�D R1•••ll. HAr-ItnER. I /..-= I NO>T�gt ._..._-.. .. ,._-.-.. F I� FLOOK P�� - -- �'� - ------ SC" IU PIPE wITH Ne fz-'� 1 ) All grooved ouPI ings to be rigid type unless noted UAUmt� uM'c,•bts e-+1 �►. -•1 otherwise. W b M-a l� r'L/►LlEI? tl - Nfw o,G TtUsR. z) All earthquake bra+' Ing to be bolted to •.:tructur! with 1/7" CONTRACT WITH ScN lu tavat R"It'` M '►�s� bolts. Connections to joist to be mad'+ ren top mrd only. 'tKt oPL I'9L� hT R. — ----+• 'V�t. .,,.t u- �iwti. i" +w w roill't -#t"" +MIS; 1 F-2C �31"SC�Q CC�W5TI�l...1CTIONJ 3) FC -- light weight flexible coupling. ZI, N W �KJ�L. M> 4) All line hangers to be "0" type U.N.O. MI�LSFk�I°J> OP- cl-11Z4-937-1 S) All arm-overs tr, he 1 x O'-6' U.N.O. p{lppl . (7C7�)� E�%31 COUTIVJ t-ioL-5, q� ' I�E •. i', �ct13 �o1.lE�csa;)9i�-r_�.trz sut�'r•� - t 7855 SW Dartmouth Street ---- _ --s.x� �-- NU - 7of10 _ '_ _ 4PRINKLER LEGEND SPRINKLERS USED REVISIONS GENERAL NOTES GESIGN CRITERIA AND NOTES HANGER LEGEND ---- ------- FYI'IC I�Bte//tS West A "U" HOOK M MACHINE THREADED ROD SPRINKLER SPRINKLERS SYM TYPE MFG/MOD SIZE TEMP. _ FINISH CANOPY DUAN MM DATE BY _ IEE Up AND OCWN o ,� 1 Al.l MATERIAIANDEOUIPMENTTOP�NEWANDUNOERWRttERSAPPROVED 1) A. Sprinkler mains G" anr,1 laarger to Schodule 10 Lightwal 1 . 600 S.E. MARITIME AVE , M300 SPKR ORIFICE SIZES Up1Q1(,HT •s,�l rt-� t EniTV_At_. Ift.O i'%I LEI. P-bQE. /A q-?O 2 PIP„V(1 DIMENSIONS ARE CENTER TO CENTER EXCEPT RISER A DIMENSIONS 4” to be Al 1 i ed Super F l o. B COACH SCREW ROD N TOGGLE NUT_ THRDS SIZE -_AND ^IPE I/ '+ ° N/E� I>3 /'1 9110WN THUSLY II-.r WHICH ARE END TO END B. 9pr i nk 1 er m.ai ns and 1 i nes 2' t. P VANCOUVER. WA 99661 PENDENT OPENING E} y+tl CwrM F'?rices s ZV3i. PJTLE. C "C" CLAMP P POWDER DRIVEN STUD OPENING - — -- -- 3 EARTHQUAKE BRACING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA C. Sprinkler i nl lar 1 i nes 1 1/ " And sinal l er to b! Allied Buper 40. S TOP BEAM CLAMP R WEDGE ANCHOR I? UP SYM8rX DONT s�P raklM r-9So 1'L" IbEn CIHM01rlE 2- Pte. I - PAMPHLET NO to (206j 6939906 1' _ 2) 5ylFtem de>41gn densities are as rollt�wslt 1 i� SPRAY © I 1-? 4 t ® yam`^/ �EEIti ly`:tlE G Gs I$ 'IL" Ibyt' 15ft�• NEAp4U/IF� B /� Y PIPE HANGERS AND METHOD OF HANGING TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH A. Entire Main Sui 1diog Roofs .49'3 QPM/2.000 9q. rt. _„_ -_ ._•_._ -- -- - -- E EINE ROD T __ — . NFPA PAMPHLET NO 13Ft. - -Y - w” >n color IIx t1p FIRE SWI 1081_ F FLUSH SHELL_ U v I It 1'7 RAS�►+�I t7 APPROVALS REQUIRED DIS I UTION S PIPING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA PAMPHLET NO 13 B. T i r P sales-1 e5: 40 rI'M/2,000 sq. W_ V -_-.__.---_----_-.__-- 4- SPTIAY a 1 1 (� I -- - -- - - _ - R JOINING Of N FITTINGS. THREADED AND WELDED SHALL BE IN C. Bakery and Meat treat .20 (31'M/Entire Cnt�ler G CEILING "LANGE ---_ __—� TV. Fle !. zC5C_jE TV• FIZE REwJr A QuALIn coratROL er oAt( _i- `-,,._T - �Z r qu,_,1 4K,C1� 7 OWNER O P70VIOE ADEQUATE HEAT TO PREVENT WATER IN PIPES FROM D. Large Freezer er end I^�,ol er! 23 BPM/Entire From?.Per er _ Q 1,7. 12 ,,? c�,,I,f= Office g J AM►ROVEO FOR FABRICATION tatr DATE -W—SIDE BEAM BRACKET W _^ l - - �'� - --- FREEZRKG IN ARE-AS PROTECTED BY A WET PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTEM E. 0 f f i c e Areas . 10 (3F'M/1 540 SQ• Ft• — - 7 16 ? SIDEWALL , It{�• Fy J — a STP,UCTURAL ADEQUACY OF THE BUILOING TO SUPPORT THE SPRINKLER F. Entrance Canopy: . 10 (3PM/1,950 Sq• Ft• IIPMlOYEO FOR INSTALLATION tar DAVE i x —___— _ • TEMP ll` —�- - '-- PIPING IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER ANb/OR HIS STRUCTURAL RT REPRESENTATIVE SIGNER DATE 108 tMp. ►IT K SHO CLIP Y - - 1 RATING t 1 DRY TYPE 3,yo, TOTAL THIS SHEET 447 -TdTAL- .•-�'�— -- 3 08/20/96 '11!I!11j!111111!li�1lJlj�JI 11l l!I!1!I!1!1!Ilil ! IjIlIIIl!Illlli I�I�i�i;11111 I1I1I1liIJill 111!1!II1!;!1!1I 'Nllllllllllll�lll�llllllllll!Illlllllllllllllulullllllllulllllllhlll IIn�IIIIIIIIIIInIIlllllllllllln InIIIIIIIIIIIhIIIIIIIIIIIuIIIIIhIIIIIIIIhIIlllllllllllllnllulltlnllllllllllllllll IIIIIIInInnIInIII nlllllIII lnlnllllnllinllinl�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIllllllllllllf; , K",• .. .;a .....: n+. ,_... •Y' .. , Tr­ 9 I 1415 .� IS tti17RALJ�iC.41-_l' / Dt /• LA4_�•�t_ATF.dl TO T�ELIVl1L A DC41, 1 ... r �'�, "i�4Z -• -'L-V� c v Z--. .qqS G7VNl /tA.CT. :NEE_ (LTbA� �;� �' , `��•„ tiT�yb E ; Tri�5y 'Zoloo " FT ,. '_ ` ' j� tt AMPb ��7�1Yr! �. A A. sop -__* j Px13 1�uD f�lxi Fig=/ MATc-�•Il It,l� •SIEE S+FT s�Z. � - _' � .. . . . •�. rr �� �� ter: ��� � � � • �� �� �r�� � t ��� t♦♦ �r Its !�� ��� r �� �� •� .•.�� + �. ��� � ' � . A.., IIIIIAI - if I . L to•O N 1 06 V` vi � U ,. '"� Iv, o Im O ,� 10 P d to-n ✓1 10-P p z Nh tiq 74 Iv VI � t = �r - -In-0 � I I .. I - ---•- ._ QQ3 1 I I II I - I usT111 wA u ti ib O f4mP /-� /// I ►.'1r ��C>T C..L-T1 C.�1`'-J I�ETI�II L i 7. r I i �J t i y�. I t-/ �l L N -6 I I� ' '• 114 ILl / t Z• I + + _....._ 1 yT ri 1: � H Io-•o ib t I Ilk I AFF I on r a tea• I I N - 1 I 'Q N gyp_ I � I I I I I I I U I! d' d C3� 14 O I � ® b 'V •- 1 4 IV Leelt ,o. 4 a to•<a w-o I i s i I I i A O Qi I 4A A T _ e i L07�11 11 ' -i`'� .ttd 1 NJ ,{. M V L L , .V Nr t tiA t A t. - - �3►. Z. t- X n q , In-n *A -F, 8 o-v 10 lo- 10- I In 0-O In-r7 f L ' / \ at o 9 -r� (n o 0 1 to z 8 c to-o�l c o `� 4 �} - - - - W r vs h 11-L O r-t.0 t c> •L,-p ,. \�17 J 1 _- -- is t t L'1 2 L t- ot,�I W,Yr� RALIc ' •nI� — TV M �' * r % T►ty:..K- _�D�ala cANOP,r 1 tL Z't o� i.1. 2ti. n 1 't Zt 2- •,�rli•. (�•� � 4Q Iy j, t L 4 L L. L'L N, �+ O 4-rp IWJ 9- ry l r� to �JL L_UM�_ TRU�"E _ I v L'T-I U N ��E T P.L�t_ � � >� b� c' .ycF,� it II � i ! I � Nr` •C ALE_ Z V I ��A•R1' �.�t'rA C1YP)1 � ..-_ � I --- I '� I I -� rf W 9�n ' I I a I 2tL I I I (Z� i I � I I 'f. 0� Lip o r' ' I I ! ILL it tt L1. , � I I ( ( I I I I I o• I p L ' t tit Ah ( 't, , I t• IL ; � tl 1 ,LII 1 9-V n-.. -�► z lo_ v o m o 4-0 -V I to.o I tt9 9 1-4 I I fi.r [PAS ftor> H v!I i J �0 I � -z4 4 � lee � ° � �, �I �� 1_ z'� k Z Z ; t 4• I I , I � V IN -- - - 1 - rl- � I _I_ , I+• O G�-[O O"10 L'� b-Z ,•P Zn+ �.1 0 0 0;hb U-O 1 IT 1 I Q �'tiJo i I I 1 I i <, -sl �0 a ,'� �>,.. oTo� 71L 'Zt•- I �� ZIL It Zrtl I Z'� I t 't "LLL I 1 , It v- jo-i S.(, rr-P I 0-,' 't,4 - 1•LL i � + ♦- 1_ ,0?!. 1� -,/+Z�" Z6. "l.>,. SIL I t Z� z "LL I 'LL �}"�-"_-'^�j;q�.».�� 3-�II� .y=c,r-. ���- -c '—,� +�+u a-o c f , 9•t0' I to- 9-lo 16 N­v �+''� �•� 4 � { ' `• � ' � � 1 t •,r �J � Ik �' :.,. 2 Lt.-1 .' 1•ti• I I I I I Zt L Z. , 3••11' 6+-� 3•If r-'Y. to•O I t I I I 1 I ' I t I 0•{0 n , rn 0 OSI O I I i �. I I I Z'T• 1 t ` 4 L fil1 _ Z� 7� �: n -A zAPF 2'.1 I 1 I / T ZTrLr.V i 1L 1 ° Lit rn ZiL --J L - _ __..J L d lL h `L11-'3-4 n-e7 [ SOD ,y -t I r r., t i 2�- a �' _y, I 1 /0 h 'N�1 L�1+ (301.h Z•L ( 91 IR- - ' II'1•• I'1. 1 � - - -so 10 Its ---- - dlot, o �) S' t4 -rJ l4 t til i4 Z Z. Y.4 zz _ opf 1-4 grL�,�� r•R ♦ 'I s 2_ 1„ ^ v, I.• T T I.',.n 7 �Z1' I� 9-(p 2Jt Z `1 t -ro --- / �� �, - -' C - - .J .r lei'o AE VarulF �+5� ° n 1� F�../1IV o'•4 @ u Cel-O I - ----- r4 Com r>Ec.,� .._-. ��. �.:K�t a M.o.�.;-f• ,,�.,o1X'a:1 �l a w.o.�.l s lI-��t 4 r•�= _.-.._ C_.� - vt, -Tor, F"IeAe 1 LUff�T' -- - NOTEti• t r �^-_. it 4 TAt•-.�L=sL LI.Jw�P _ '-�T _ ---� 1� • !f -TnP Ct-to c `----- I - r` I otherwise. TRACT NAME 1 � All grooved couplings to be rigid type unless noted (_C)5TC O WH�AI 4,T1L�LFL- rzU_S ] - "calf"Hui 1 w►�sn+EQ i----- .M#EA__ -I-it All earthquake hr Acing to br! bolted to structure with 1/2" nA9L,r L- p�--I,•�� C -c-�� EL—AW I - 1� cord only. TIU p McuTH RD. .�- - the nTR Tu . I \' r 1, �r� 4- r�t`, faults. Connections to Dist to be madR r.�n top �" SC.N-ice: '/g"xl'-o 3t fir• - light ww_i4F�t flexible coupling. ' 111 _ 4 a Ali 1 1 ne hert(�er - to be "D" t'•�pe U.N.O. 'r4 F_AI 51 All arm-o•rers tr- be 1 x 0' -S U.N.O. wt-.1_hE3p +. PPL+:>ffLS E-.IA O..II1 f�lAt�r� IN rON1gACT WITH I / y USl. tti' StN Iv FI M4C MnIN•j� R I�50k] DCII\ T�UL '�e eR 1yM I►T R. --�• WIC �+ii1 (u�•F V ,1..1 to Fit tY'IT f-II 1.13tvc7 Q VJ Cr]2►JE11_ RD. HIl1-SIicJRL) �-1124'-A3"L 1 Nokia (So3t(r'15-8'5+11 C.C1NT V_r 1�tAKff MI' 855 SW Dartmouth Street AN IEQ T tai" � tom" w1Alr-i _. J(16 PW-*IF (SCY109/ng--t_10It SOFT; 1`N�.0- DESIGN CRITERIA AND NOTES _ HANGER LEGEND SPRINKLER LEGEND _ SPRINKLERS USED REVISIONS GENERAL NOTE8 --------- r*-e systems west A "U•• HOOK —_- M MACHINE THREADED ROD SPRINKLER T SPRINKLERS S.YM TYPE MFG/MODEL SIZE TEMP. FINISH CANOPY DUAN MM uATE By _ __�-_-_ - SPI EE l;p AND DOWN `�`�LJ ELo GE M-f-RAL �t.� •�3I " LtW�" �I� ZBi1 1 ALL MATERIAL AND EOUtPMENY TO BE NEW AND UNDERWRITERS APPROVED 1) A. Sprinkler mains 6" and 1 sr qer to he Schedule 10 L i ght wa 1 1 . B COAI;H SCREW R00 N TOGGLE NUT _T THRos ORIFICE YIZES uPRK;HT S11E - 600 ANS.E i 1 I:ITIME AVE., +I e ? SHOWN DIMENSIONS (I-$)AWN WHICH END TO END eKCEPT RISER 6 DIMENSIONS B. Sprinkler mains and 1 i nes 2" t o 4" t o be Allied Super Flo. AND TYPE PE)�NT •- oo .IIRoPI 5AR_. eA42. VANCOI,+'1 69 99 98661 C "C'• CLAMP _ P POWDER DRIVEN STUD _ OPENING OPENING sSt' aEc-. r„�M P 97Z /i' Z - n C. Sprinkler nk 1 er 1 i nes 1 1/2" and smaller 1 1 er t a be Al 1/ed Super 40. 93 9406 _ _-- -'---"--- 3 EARTHQUAKE BRACING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 1? top SYW•x 001N SSW GEM ISSJ6 e- 61-11 V I Lim r3RJff fAV equAILD _ PAMPHLET NO 19 '2) System s1 si on densities are of /01 l Cws t ( 1 6 D TOP SEAM CLAMP R WEDGE ANt HOR _-_ ! ! 7 ! -- -- - - tF; V ? 16 B 16 ? SPRAY ® 1. 1 ? '� , (jq,� � PIPE HANGERS AND METHOD OF HANGING TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH A. Entire Ma' in n Bu L 1 d i n g Rco I 1 •'39`•L C4t'M/2,000 t3q. F t. _- t - -- ._-.-..- _. C EYE ROD - T _ - -- -- - ----- -- NEPA PAMPHLET NO t9 - - L� ® 1.7 �# �`r '►'mow GSM F 940 YZ' 15�jro LN�M� GNaDME. 6 APPROVALS REQUIRED __ DISTRIBUTION 5 PIPING SHALL BE_ IN ACCA)RD/NCE WITH NFPA PAMPHLET NO 19 9. Tire Sales: 40 IOPM/2,nt!i> Sq. Ft• n «.r+e IK no FIRE SWI leOEl_� µ- F FLUSH SHELL U _ SPRAY _ - - - - -_-- -_ _- CEILING FLANGE V - - I� I I I - T V f-1�) FLCSwf T.�l. FIFLC 'aU1� i ' 6 JOINING OF PIPE AND FITTINGS• THREADED AND WELDED SHALL BE IN f:. Bakery and Meat Ar eat 20 t$PM/Entire Cooler QUALITY CONTROL BY-- ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA PAMPHLET NO 1:I - DATE �. Large geezer and Choler + •23 C�P'M/Entire Freezer i tl G Q 1�lA�P� � �1 py,lAl��/glvrcH S 7 OWNER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE HEAT TO PREVENT WATER IN PIPES FROM APPROVED FOR FABRICATION BY - DATE - H SIDE BEAM BRACKET W ! 3 3 1 yr 112 SIDEWAII I _` -- FREEZING IN AREAS PROTECTED BY A WET PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTE..: F. Office Areas 10 GPM/1 r 500 Sq. rt. - - _ -I J' MOLT X - 165 -_ -- P4W ' 6 STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY OF THE BUILDING TO SUPPORT THE SPRINKLER AP*RIrIED FOIL IMSTA+ ATION Br TEMP REPRESENTATIVE IS 1HTtVE SPONSIBILI*Y OF THE OWNER ANO/OR HIS STRUCTURAL F". 1 n t r anc a Can.p y t 1O 13PM/1 r 950 Sq• rt• DATE DEStri WItE JOB Mtn It S:WT' CLIP --- Y 1 RATING lllb• - -- �n _ I DRY rrPf TOTAL THIS 4HEFT i ... - � ' )'A' TnT 7 CN!kk p-p0'�+*n� /�/9•t 3"1 Z. '4 1� E;r•I 08/20/96 itl!It�lltlli� ttiliii�ilili I ilillll�ilili 11111111{Iliillt iiiliji�illll t iilP1111�ill i i�illll�iliii ! ililt�i�ii!li ! ilililiJill il ! iIlitltltititit t tltltllllitit tIIIIIt1tItl' INTM MADE K171NA — I �_ — J � � 17 N — i H{1111 IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Illlllllllllllli'IIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIInIInIIIIIIIIIIIhIIIIIIIIIIInIIIIIhIIiII,IIIIIIIfilnllllnlluullnlllllllllnlllllllnl IIIIhIIIllnllnlllnnllnlllnlllnllnnlnnllnlilnllllllllllllllnlnll�lllilli ' s I d q ; NEAR CJ T � � I + ZOO�i.,....._.............-._............. . � .:�r^ W,xt.i-. THIS AY.CA l5 Ny UKAL.IL-k•�4t_ '- CA". } L ;Y I.IL•ATx:[> To D j._1U113�_ A ! C1ftJ<sl'T'`( Off' .4qs C>P4••I /SI�.FT' ( G ,_� 3=i:' ! fSa3 ga0 I (lyU MATc►��ILJE ,Elr, �./ MW ill= ser_ �� �� �� r'. rrara ��� rates ra�� r ARRRR., r.., �1t t•� �� fit• rpt• �4.�� r� A ��t• ��� �s ��1� rft� te � 'AARROW �.--. alr �' ��� err• .�� +r� � I _ ^II IL �. L NN I v, _I t 4 a \,.-' �, — ♦ �Q� �1 { ' ,' �1 ?„>� r �I 1 c 1r,-p o-Ca IU.c>dh v, -p l `1101 _ih S 9 4 w/ ^ o C I + j .f, t p ' 1n > ^ -c h t, IL N P P �-._ TIKE Q�k A dh U 14 ? �Ih AeG, NYDRA�IL►L:rrw.l_ ` )� J THIS •� I�,;-„ ! to v +o , E, 6 q a r, ` CAL.c�..lt f�TEfa To Df 4111 A II ( I I a t7Ew151TY Of- .40 SVM IMA-FlT. F 1 { ( t11. <F I a. , + r} , N �, T p c)ym z000 Sq.Pr.c ( ',4' .,._.._ (,,-,• P 9-13 N 10-0 I P-0 O + ► z z ; ' 4 r` t p AU J I I I i I i 1 8-41 ' 1 � a Q4,11SI 4,A ROD ' 01 111. i Q t- ° z '^ , ti 4 t �, ti O ,� 13 13 1 1 11 A-4 A I n-rte Ir, ,7 c,• , 1 'l. 1. Q t Z A A -_ - 1 7_77'r- S1. L YI t Q 2. 11 z Z N /l n 114 i n AGG 1 Q � T� 03 n-ia In`p Ic•-O In-t� to-[ lo.p �'�""�"7F`—� J I 1 4 4 - 's � .�+ � �� � I ( I O-O ( ra r rj Q'�/ - �f Iw�q'^"'rr'w"�'�n .w.-... ..._»...,•.,,_ I� ... t,..cb -L1-O t1�p _ Y A III /� __ - in �Mt• - - - w.".. .rr._. ...wn._ ....... �u...n,-_ I t ^ , '",T' � 1 p L L hr t= � zw •(o, 2�� i't I 11. Z,4. 1'� I, iJ �1 � Z'C � •3 M 24`i. �yy �` _. r1 �, �- 2'L •{4 ' I 1" Z t ,---.-� �ar G� Zrt G. 1 1 L Z6 Lt c9�✓ t,L 8 B ,� ;-8 -l0 I')-/1 4 c q-Cp r L` 11 tt 'LL r,a,� T.� Z�. L Li. tt t'� I+q {>, 8-11J d I le_p 'wl 1' 0 tp (><qL7 D Q'11+ y-n l� •.. �I {o o-r� q-fo �-4 + I $-v 0 � N JJ r ? ! C�- _ It ' ! f o• r r -- -- ,- --� M - - -s. I T•- ----I j------r-1 ----- -- - - ' j r- q-cam a_q It i� 1 4' I I I •� --�. ! I � 1 I � s �- t �} -e as I I .._... � I t A� � I .t 2 I I 1 � I � , I � i I � I i � , � r � i I I 2't ► , � I � - +-� a,'I •+ 0 jl g g I I I I I I; I III I { I I Zlt- 1 q. L -•-� 1 ,! j I i' I I I I { ' { �! I U I ! ; { I -� Q^+� 8-(e ti✓'Px 4 1 i -- 0 \ a + 1 - 170, LI13 >/( 2t Rol Pv 17/ ( ( I 1 LXF 24 Z ZLI. Lr, l I I -ILL, IL.L I� 8 -� �� I I I «I-� �- t I f ` I f Ito � +� M - I l; bast D { t3c I I ! �� + j I' I I ' ! i i 9�tp i 0-{ filo 44 y - f I 1 I ,1 _C0 47 45 F ED(I �r,-V I ! 0-fo ° ? �- <0 47-Ll- a- !4 N 40 O bib I t I j I �I I I I I Q� 1-Y r'1. Top cvrsd _ ► ' I t � R4TA1.,.a� zL t -L7ffit- I Z.ti »I 1o-$"'� 1 1 I 1 �', I I Z4. 1, � � •:�Ir=�_ T Iia.,•, .. I 4 ` 4- I ' I I , I li I 74z SthIc,,a Z� 4 E Atf. A '"r k I'- I 0 nn u1•tc. ��.-1�..Ert b I I i ,- E ;, o � I li ! , o IC _ �� I ' I I i � 1 {' ! j li � � f � I 1 j I .Lt� '�� m N,y�• >4a 1 '—f,, � IO I t9 I I I I I ___YYY I I I 2 14 0 , C - r L tr 1 -� `r\!f� 01 {' � I j ` I , I ' I j , _I �._. 4 I + I I 5,14 114 t lo-a iq_ol JO Ig_i, , t rv' + ro Lt ZZ r 4 F _ I I I Irj q (.. r ( I $ I I - I S 4tlbxi * WOTEt3t �o-�I 10 r4 ,L1, � { I I I C1+�1.LyL.At'I�;D TO pt[I..IViC1� A I r { r�•,n R� j t � I I gI 'f'i �3 ' { i I .�-.� 0 Df i1SY OPS .4asGPM UCI.PT. ! "� o' 1) A11 grooved coupling% So be rigid type unless Hated ti I i ( I 1 tOOCO SQ.F T I --J i - 3 to P !� ::! p YP ® li; (4� r�J/ otherwise. ATL \ 2) A11 Irarth Lake brach to be bolted to structure With 1/7" d'u at; y1IL '1.It I , 3U I I 1 l .i-... +. ,- .._".+ t...... .....,..- ZI L �iuD _i 9 Q v,} �Ip 1 PPPP�3 15oRD d q Si J. LI't I I O ( ;� I I I' 1 i �(v a y _ bolts. Coniectiuns to joist to be made. un top cord only. I R-rs, g ' I I t• I +F ( ' ,Z''�' Wit+ Zt Zh ZL Z` I Z'y , c 3) FC = light veiaht tleKibler cou ling. If �.,� :, `� B-ci .. : V •� 4) All line hangers to be „D„ type U.N_O. s 5. All arm-overt/ to be 1 x 01-6" U.N.O. t •_ 21 t I I Of I I ! 3 b I I I .. .'- 402, / p ra, _­1\ `� ' ILy { "I i I 1aF s� I IL 7 I { j I �j -, _ M1-+ ao 3i L,� `, I Iq ! .p F, ,';-e :1-� I I r ----+- + +-�-- �+ + i -- ---�p—Ut t t 2 ei-o j N SpD TNIS ASA IS AYDeAU0C.Au-Y VAI, 1 1 1 ,19 s I >.r , G�-G.u6 AYTc. TO L w o'AFa= .Q F - of .10 r •� t j AFF 4 � ( ; 1 I +`� _ -"_"_ I � �, .ti I \• cuE.',t .aPM/54• RT", l��� 19So SfaZ . RIP q --- --Z -J t_ ) z, 14 S Ico ty h�. I 1,. 9 O • r. p"� I ----- j �� , r Q ttloC - Imp `q.r' "'1F' 11' ' ? Z •�- i- Z I+- L ,tt I _ ' flab q_�/ 1D'O z r.-f� Seo �' .v j. (/^�) //-•�� (;np 1.L r / �Z� rl r� 41 t1 , A-0 t I-o a f1 �". ►_._�' rX-----•-;I . . _.y c_ 1 - 1 , I u , v \4 - - L -- - ---Z'• -- - �7�- ---Z'i - ' Z-o t1_o , ZI ca + L '� aro I I�'^ia o l0r `o .✓ v 2 1-� m_A t "e '_a°''t-' - -Ert -all;- -L 11 Iti 1!1 I , N ,t y,� .� , q /p z-4 1 to '� _ 9 )Ir Fit- - Lt i 11L z tIL t ' the S M -_ - - -. - ... T _ L l-- g -,� L _ CO rt-lD to r A-o o �.. w �° o•to �g o - -- _ - - -- r--- - - -- - -- -B - J I' Zt ; �xAM S ��ih "� K If tp TX-` Bu QtC OA If u ( o u' Q �� e,A U, ,cy 4 / 's WT�1' ��►.ioPY ' — nD 1. `'v ••V' n - p 'Lt "1�• 'Z.�.. >. 2 `'LTA'- .L _----_.�Ty..__.� - - -- 4 .e , s.i''J'1.1 y b 1� /\,�y ;y + I,t., Hf>� �/Al-il1� �. 1 o'er q� O -o 1� 9 0 2<I b (O q•C� S"s i!O S'o' AGT= - - --- __ _y'_ it 9 l 1, T9 ti/__ ♦ _r L� - y f _ . 2•� 1 lO e P>SD !- 1 110-tL rj 1 - 4 ?\L L �� L L M 1- r m I 14 I �� J Atm Q 6 Q� Z Q� Ui5 Qat Q tet I-up F3t�D — 0 � i 4 _ 4 I � �v� ® 0 ® � n � d � /° ,ly � rn' •� �l.J� I D�� r( 'll7(r 6 m - (D ctr A tP ro ONTRACT NAIA _11. C f '!r"wLK"Kurt w�.HER� s----• -=ra r¢u�5 t "' 'ps _ 14 tlo 1nl x.31 �� CJ t,l osTc oII-ic�l_�SAI._ - S � A rZTM uT?4 R.D. wt r" le U �r-> c� _—� �—f •_ . r/ ARD,C�R,n � n _ --- ----- o..� EA. , 1 _ _. . ( ypl• 630T;I 4-r i' ri�O ( �(p'`11. f.�-G q �" 4 a `1_" t u¢ +"fc„ S� L -- ' ' : ' � coq-r� u s ss.t o w T----T-- --- 4 to 4 cn �f o' 4-iv S s / Yt ^T Tt. •-----� 'Vlu lain/3 w " Zc Q cl)L I c4G�V n 'T-"'—,� "' — 9 CONTRACT WI1h1 (L1�IPr. L •,L.4 t.., F.YL tel ii; MAhI5, ELnI.. �V_v l.� ._..�_I TR�CTIa n F'A1�T1'�I. �L- (�, F'L,�f\1 'D-v-pQ Q w cry �e 7855 SW Dartmouth Street .ill•€. rg°;Ib" zyc t>D �' r�o�lr 1 + < 44-L S&)ttc-7, mit_ a 1124-93L1 9 0! 10 RlrlCr NArJCaIEQ, 1�I ► _ I'NOhJ r. (S03)fo -+�S31 cni.lT�T `--' -'--^---" Jr� �NM�.:{St/;l 9blti-i"S9L SCJ : MaK1:_ HANGER LEGEND SPRINKLER LEGEND_ SPRINKLERS USED REVISIONS A "U- HOOK M MACHINE THREADED ROD _._. GENERAL NOTES � DESIGN CRITERIA AND NOTES --•-- -- SPKR SPRINKLER TEE SPRINKLERS 5YM TYPE MFG/MODEL SIZE TEMP. FINISH CANOPY DUAN MK DATE BY F`lre systems West S COACH SCREW ROD -- N TOGGLE NUT y THRDS ORIFICE STIES UPRIf.N1 511E UP AND DOWN - F��) Rte z;, „ 218L t3Q� N�� �r�� ---- --11 , AL: MATERIAL AND EOU#PMCNT TU 8E NEW AND UNDERWRITERS APPROVED 1 ) A. Star i nk 1 e, ma i n1; 6" and 1 ar qer t o be Schedule 10 1 1 gh t wA 1 I AND Tref. PEWNr - _.-_ _ —____., - _ t P PING DIMENSIONS ARE CENTER TO CENTER EXCEPT RISER a DIMENSIONS 6Lf0 S.l MARITIME AVE., #,'W C "C" CLAMP P POWDER DRIVEN STUD OPENING OPENING 4raU (-F-M C95r3 „ 165' LXI '� P. Sprinkler mains and lines :" to 4" t„ be A, 1 ied Su er !-lo. D TO_P_BEAM_ CLAMP �i4 _—`�' -- `— - '.MOWN THUSLY Ii-0)WHICH ARE END TO END r P R WEDGE ANCHOR 1 ) S ® I Z' UP Srttleot DOWN LSP iR(t, ore A 1z 917_z_ / I s4 r HRDME. RE',- r-He-• 3 a EARTHOUAKE BRACING SHAH BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEPA C. Spr i nk 1 er l i ne',s 1 1/2" and Intal 1 PY to be Allied Super 40. VANCOUIVER, WA 4N61 SPRAY -- _ PAMPHLET NO 17 2) System design lensi t i es are as Toi i oWg 7 (206) 693-4906 EYE ROD -- T 16 I� 7 ('p I I,) (, I Syw (,VIA I5,SIA E C_/a--4o5 41 165� 1�2z. NFA GRAIL Irk t PIPE HANGERS AND METHOD OF HANGING TO RE IN ACCORDANCE WITH F FLUSH SHELL U I. L (] L't' I I. - F&Z,4HISL NFPA PAMPHLET NO 11 Ei, T 1 A. Entire RSales:, Building j'M O 7,bnl)rt g449F5t GPM/2,000 Sq. F t . `— - - - SPRAY APPROVALS RE UIRED [DISTRIBUTION 5 PIPING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA PAMPHLET NO 13 I� �� I JOINING OF PIPE AND FITTINGS THREADED AND WELDED SHALL BE IN C. Bakery mnd Fleat At-Pat .20 QPM/E•nti re Cooler *" f1 CMM tK 'b iIRE$_WI1tp�1 -- - CEILING FLANGEV ' �� C]o , I 4 I ~"' t T.+/. =I�' �'�-�� ------- N SIDE BEAtY BRACKET W „r I iJ 1�p — --` — ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA PAMPHLET NO 13 ------ H SI BOLT x 2 r; I6 ? SIDEWAII : - _ 0-i" 2- AWAA OWUCiE-/.AR<� _ S 7 OWNER TO PROVIDE ADEOUAtE HEAT TO PREVENT WACTER IN PIPES FROM D. Large Fr PIPZ !r and Cool rr't 23 4PM/Entire Freezer i;UAIItY CDNTROI EIV - UA TE - t' 165• ``_ OV40 FREEZING IN AREAS PROTECTED BY A WET PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTEM E. Office Arent . 10 I3PMI/1,300 9q. F t. APPRGtlEO For I ABRIOATIGN BY - ' -DATE - fEMF X17' _-- - _" - I STRUCTLAAL Ar-Oui-Y OF THE BUILDING TO SUPPORT THE SPRINKLER F. Entrances CAncopyi 10 l3PM/1,930 So. F*t K RT CLIP - Y -- - _- I DRY TYPF I. RAtINr reb NG IS THE N"S'BltlTY OF THE OWNER ANDrOR HIS STRUCTURAL APPROVES .OR INSTALLATION BY )SW — RF.f71ESENTATIV DATE DATE • TOTAL TH15 SHEET qcr, , OES,+uNER 08/20/96 (Iijl{i�1{C11 Aft M CHNA{i{I i{ lEj � l II i Ilijili�ili{I i Ililill�llillll ililili{hili I ilil!li�llili i�i�ii(�IIIj11( I{Ilil�'lllll ► �lil!ll�lllll llji{iii{i�i(�,�!I I i�l�(�III�III ilili;;�l�l{i '1111111II�nlllinl Illl�lllllllllllllllllllllllf Illlllln IIIIIIIII nllllln�llll(IIIIIIIII(Inllllllllllllnlllnllllnlllllllllnlnnlllllllnlllllllll�llllllhlnllnlllln�lllllnll�llnlnlllllllllnl Illlllllllllll�llllllllfllllllllllllllllllallllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllltl�• ' r 1 _ zz I , dv -- 'fLl nwA. v2. /w. I ' �-`� ��o„', r --- 1 �;`,1 _ r. ` [� r I ks / rrL, f ,- E LhOA 2. l Au1L R. VA.I b II'`I 1 irl+iaRt�i►Ac-Y - I 1 c� �c\ 1.1 t 0 + + 4 0 0 0 �y 0 LJ_ 1 7 0' - w,x. M VA. -- _ r � T ��d .►► I t t J f ira�o AIN y tt. C� Z4L'L _ y Ilyr -_�---'- 11-o— _t , A c; 1g Ti i•4,1 ---- 2 4� 1 /:;1 I r F -- l3 ” I ,.fir RIA. 1 1 u n �''� 1 0 I l Lit ,,1 - ;�� Pit VA. r+/,n rnplf k •v+Mr7M N I .! � I I / I� --------- '--. - �� O I J a N I - N IE.. -•�' Fw V r iy FR�tCL2 HAS WaSlgatl S 1 � I - rk:iRA%3L1L,04 :Y L1w�ArT'=D I p I �' I `t Dt1JVlilL A IJ�.I41Ty of 1P. 1111 I r+u pT '�' ' t'S by1Gf� T►1F.: Sm-nitE• ARltI1 i ` ►�" L j t IL0? I rJ N -�. h �-- . - 0 0 � •7s" CUOL.-•E 12. I I � � -- - Owl � t 9 1 I YPLIN I i-K}�'LF�fZ f �i C-ZL� '� ►' 1 2 21 L i 2 L 2 14 1. M M 1 ,1 .1 1 �'C7 � LI-11 \� - •;w �y.(� it 1., -- C-ski. 190 $=04• _ _ O _.._..--------- D r _ Sc._4�_J�. '/e I, �. I oe•A,p j Q u 10 NM6�AT PfZ1�° AREA HAS F3Ei.N 1 T t �: b k 'rn kyl r i'1lEFV I. H NRp U L ILA I.L-Y C A V G41 L AICD T� f7k'l.l V 1 a f�n+'yITY of .Zo oY1�fZ THE EWTIRE ARIA. vA��T 1 i'L.ufr GTS 7.'4 7 I mom-K P�+11-►. \ 1 N/Til MPf.AL ''AIV II -M -r S►a.�dT c I P II � i� 4 - 2x4 alc\c•IL 1• � Q e 0 I !•IIY. Vk. VA. 1117 AFF= --- - I � a 1I� � c..4 WEIX.F_ 0 Q � Z I►Ew ) Q 1� ; SPY SSP �- _ �I I I *-r, .,-_ ` �•x.�El�F6E'L°2_Fc4. il�i� i-� 1-O � T I rte..�s�r /�M�f 00 %. *A r_ I '►Ota \ 1 � I ��/ I AG�V y� --- -- - , 1 «, -09 OF 01 0 4!,k1 I 1 L i M y G 1 1 x-`,--- S': it /•'_ , _o' S�nL t �X. vA. o- I 1� �Q dbtA yl S/y'14A �4---AQ _._._ _—_• :N2i Top P-e-ft.-N r_LAh^ ' (►� -TvP C.V110 COIL __._-_ N(]TF'Jt /i)ONT''ACCT NAME LL STSA J� , / CGA I I.O W H�L_ r77 \h� ¢w� Nn,.JcER 1 ) All gtogv?d c:ouplinga to he rigid type unless noted - 7g S4 Sw faARTN1o1JTH IZD• otharwise. All earthquake bracing to be bolted to Structure with 1/2" '1"1G1Art� (, bolts. Conne._tions to joist to he made -xm top c,-:•4 only. 3 FC - light weight flexible coupling. --� 5I All line hangers to be "D" type U.N.O. — All arm--nver s to be 1 x Ot-6" U.N.O. CONTRACT WITH f, RoF,li�.�5o►�.) �.I�j o ►.1.1n�. C/9fU�,L_- RD Y r E r� BEY PL�r`1 I 7855 SW Dartmouth Street ---Fu=���- ----- Hll_LSfihlt0, C>tC 'lilt -q;7.1 I--•I AN�, nND� :r Tp31 tn¢S Ss31 Cnr.lTAcx". P1L,�IcC tJc�ScAltlC oR� PHoall£ (St1 5uPT : MARk� 10 of 10 - — HANGER LEGEND SPRINKLER LEGEND SPRINKLERS USED REVISIONS GENERAL NOTES DESIGN CRITERIA AND NOTES Fire Systems West 1) A. 9prir,�1P-r mains 6" and larger tO bP Schedule 10 Light:wall . A -U" HOOK _ M MACHINE THREADEDRO_D ",PRIr,NI[R SPRINKLERS SVM TYPE MFG/MODEL SIZE TEMP. FINISH CANOPY gUAN MK DATE Br ---- I ALL MATERIAL AND EOUIPMENT TO BE NEW AND UNDERWRITERS APPROVED � 600 S E MARITIME AVE., 0300 SPKR ORIFICE SIZES UPNK,HT TEE UP AND DOWN y� (aF_M1�1 FgSQ /7,1 IE,S� r }IIppM� l_Pr_ +ol Z6 _�-- 2 PIPING DIMENSIONS ARE CENTER TO CENTER EXCEPT RISER A DIMENSIONS P. Spr i nk t er mains and lines 2" to 4" to be Allied Super F lo. VANCOUVER, WA 98881 t9 COACH SCREW ROD N TOGGLE NUT - _ THRDS SIZE e — SHOWN THUSLY 11-0t WHICH ARE END TO END C. Spr i nk l e!r lines 1 1 /2" and smaller to be Allied Super 40. AND TYPE pET#IVT OFENIND • sr-P F- r.. CAF-r^ F97Z. 14. 155r CHROrnE. c-NFOME tI — /� -- ) C "(:" CLAMP _ P POWDER DRIVEN TVD OFENING 3 EAM HLET NE BRACING S/1ALL B_ PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NF PA 1208 89:�991)8 S OOtM� pRY sSP IwEM Fyld vt' 153` cHRcME �NRoME 5Z PAMPHLET NO 1T 2) 3y,Rtem desiyn densities are ae followrr D tOP BEAM CLAMP R WEDGE ANCHOR T 1 SPRAY 1,7 BJP — _ _ - 4 PIPE HANGERS AND METHOD OF HANGING TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH A. Entire Main Building Roofs .4`3:5 GPM/2,OUO Sq. F-t. � ��- 14 I� ? ® I 17t , NVPA PAMPHLET NO 13 P. Tire Sales: .40 L3PM/2,000 Sq. Ft . E EYE ROD— T _ --- -- -- 5 PIPING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WIT1- NFPA PAMPHLET NO 19 WA 21 CWTV LK 40 FIRE SWI 14MI F FLUSH SHELL U ❑ • �'� 1 ® ' ' ____- _ —___ APPROVALS SQUIRED— DISTRIBUTION C. Baker And Moret Areas 20 GPM/Entire Cooler -- ------ } SWAY a JOINING OF PIPE AND FITTINGS THREADED AND WELDED SHALL BE IN y � 1 1 � , T U FIR4 � PJE'Su.1lC T.v FII •�..ItEbttllr � I ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA PAMPHLET NO 13 D. Large freezer and Coolers .23 OPM/En t i r t4 Freezer pUAltTr CON IIOI BY DAT[ -6'-CEILING FLANGE V _ -� -- - ---- w1 1 OWNER TO PROVIDE ADEpUATE HEAT TO PREVENT WATER TE IN PIPES FROM _ H SIDE BEAM BRACKET W ! Q iii 1'? 1,2 _ OVJI.If R 4Q,�.1F pvJI.NCR .4tC y FREEZING IN AREAS PROTECTED BY A WET PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTEM E• O f t i c e Areas [O GPM/1,GPM/ 6q, F t. APPROVED FOR FABRICATION INSTALLATION !r DA -- — 16 j SIDEWALL 1 165• - hS�J I 9 STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY OF THE BUILDING TO SUPPORT THE SPRINKLER F. Entrance Canopyr 10 QPM/1,960 Sq. Ft APPROVED FOP INSTAlU1T10N e1 GATE J BOLT X -- TEMP ]17• - PIPING IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR HIS STRUCTURAL DESIGNER DATE - )OB-NG. I K SHORT CUP`— Y _ I RATING �!R' REPRESENTATIVE -_ 1 DRY TYPE 1 T,yo, TOTAL THI, SHEET 9rJ - L 08/20/96 4 �III�Illlillll ilillli�III I Ilillll�l�1 1 1 �lil11111iillll 11111jilijill I I�II!ll`I�III l Ilillli�lllll I Illlllill�lll it llll�l�lll I Illllli�lll�ill lI�]I�I!I�Iil�l�� i�l�ljlll�l�l INCH MADE IN CII INA _ �+�r—a- -- 1!II!••• 1 " IIL44, LLL 11/ �r I .� T }} — I TII IIIA I TIMI!llllllllll�llllll�Il�Illllllll�llllllll�lllllllll�llllllllt�ll►Illlll�lllllllllllllllllll�lllllllllllllllllllilllllllll�lllill " Mnllnl tlllhlll�llllllll�lllnlnlll III�IIII IInIItIiIIIItIIIIIIItIIIIIIIIIIIIhlulllnlll Illnllllnlllllllllllllilllllllllll,llnllllllll VIII � 1111111 ILII y 9