Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDR2003-00017 SDR2003 -00017 VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00017 CITY OF TIGARD VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING Community(Development Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 7/14/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00017 Development Adjustment (VAR) VAR2003-00109 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Borders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access & Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Borders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. APPLICANT: Bridgeport Village, LLC OWNER: Bridgeport Land, LLC Bruce Wood, Opus Northwest, LLC Attn: Selwyn Bingham 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1130 3939 NW St. Helens Rd. Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97210 OWNER: ODOT, Region 1 Roger Hansen, Right-of-way Supervisor 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209 LOCATION: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the Oregon Department gf Transportation (ODOT) right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72' Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limed to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini- warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 1 OF 19 CONDITION S OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Division (Math-6W w Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 2428) for review and approval: 1. Revise arborist report to include street trees in the mitigation calculation. 2. Submit detailed tree protection plan for trees around the impact area. The protection plan must be reviewed and approved by the City's Arborist. 3. Provide and implement a plan that shows the proposed walkway at the vehicle access to be constructed with appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials. 4. Provide evidence that the proposed street vacations for the realignment of SW 72nd Avenue have been recorded. 5. Provide copies of the joint use agreement and cross over easements. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the ngineering Department(Kim McMillian, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 6. The existing central access to the Bridgeport Land, LLC (Borders) shall be configured to provide right-in/right-out only turning movements. Plans shall be reviewed by the Engineering Department. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) -- ------- --------- MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of city records for the subject property and found the original Site Development Review approval (SDR93-00017) for a 68,000 square foot grocery store. No other land-use cases are associated with the subject parcel. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located between Interstate 5 and SW 72nd Avenue. The subject property is zoned (C-G) General Commercial and is surrounded by (I-L) light industrial and (MUC-1) Mixed Use Commercial. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant, Opus Northwest, is responsible for the relocation of the existing Village Inn Restaurant from its present location to the proposed site. The new Village Inn site will be located in the northeast corner of the new SW Bridgeport Road/SW 72nd Avenue/Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection, just to the east of the Bridgeport Village Development. The realignment of SW 72' Avenue/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road and the provision of access to the Tri-Met Park & Ride facility and Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 (Borders Bookstore) has been the subject of considerable participation and negotiation on behalf of all of the affected parties. Access to this area will be through a shared signalized intersection off SW 72nd Avenue. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET No comments were received. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 2 OF 19 SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Zoning Districts 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.370 Variances and Adjustments 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal 18.795 Visual Clearance C. Specific SDR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Decision Making Procedures 18.390 Impact Study SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICTS Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial zoning district. The applicant is proposing to add an additional access to the existing Borders Bookstore\Bed Bath & Beyond retail stores, which are permitted uses within the C-G zoning district. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Minimum Lot Size None - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft Minimum Setbacks - Front yard - -Side facing street on corner&through lots - -Side yard 0/20 ft [8] -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - Rear yard 0/20 ft[1] - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or private street. - Maximum Height 45 ft Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% Minimum Floor Area Ratio - Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% [1]no setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zone. [2]includes all buildings and impervious area NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 3 OF 19 This application is for the construction of a new access and landscaping for the existing Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond. The impacts of the new access will reduce the site's landscaping by 1,970 square feet. However, the site's total landscaping will be 21%, which is above the minimum requirement. No changes to the existing structures or their setbacks are required with this application. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the underlying zone's development criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Variances and Adjustments (18.370): Adjustment to access and egress standards (18.705 : In all zoning districts where access and egress drives cannot be readily designed to conform to Code standards within a particular parcel, access with an adjoining property shall be considered. If access in conjunction with another parcel cannot reasonably be achieved, the Director may grant an adjustment to the access requirements of Chapter 18.705 through a Type II procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria contained in Subsection 2b below. The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirements contained in Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: (1) There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; 2 The access separation requirements cannot be met; i3 The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access- 4 The approval access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; and (5) The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met. The applicant is seeking an adjustment to the Access and Egress standards of Section 18.705.030(H)(3). There are cujrently two accesses into the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial center off of SW 72" Avenue between Durham Road and Bridgeport Road. The center access does not meet the 600-foot spacing for an arterial. The proposed shared access will align with the signalized access proposed for the Bridgeport Village development. In order to maintain the center access point for the existing Borders development, the applicant indicates that the access point will become right-in/right-out only. A Technical Memorandum by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated November 21, 2003, was submitted by the applicant. The memorandum addresses the requested adjustment to the access standards. The memorandum stags that the right-in/right-out access will not affect safety operations along SW 72' Avenue or the central access of the Borders/Bed Bath and Beyond due to the geometry of the roadway and adequate sight distance. The applicant has stated that the center access drive will be converted to right-in/right-out with the SW 72' Avenue realignment/improvements. It is not possible to share access; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 4 OF 19 The existing full-unsignalized central access is proposed to be modified to a right-in/right-out access to accommodate the proposed signalized shared access to the south. The shared access provides indirect access to the site, which is out of direction, and does not compliment the existing site layout (i.e. front door location, parking lot layout, etc.). The existing retail uses will still be required to gain an access easement through ODOT for crossing their property (Tri-Met). Retaining the existing Central Access (although limited to right-in/right movements only) will better serve the community and will minimize the impact to traffic operations and safety at the internal intersection on the Tri-Met Park & Ride facility. The shared signalized access to the south will only be required to accommodate the left-turns prohibited at the existing central access. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. According to the narrative, the property owners have agreed to a series of property transfers in order to establish the new parcel configuration and have agreed to joint use of the proposed new access drive off of SW 72r' Ave. Legal evidence in the form of easements will establish joint use. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide copies of the joint use agreement. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The Borders\Bed Bath & Beyond complex has two existing accesses that connect to SW 72nd Avenue. The new access to the site will also have direct access to SW 72nd Avenue through the new access to the Tri-Met Park and Ride and Village Inn Restaurant. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Walkways: 18.705.030(F) requires that on-site pedestrian walkways comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; On site pedestrian walkways are pre-existing between the building entrance and SW 72nd Avenue that provide access and egress as well as to the parking lot. This standard is met. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The submitted plans show a walkway to cross the proposed access drive for a distance of 40 feet. The standard above allows crosswalks to be greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are included. Therefore, the applicant must provide and implement a plan that shows the proposed NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 5 OF 19 walkway at the vehicle access to be constructed with appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts concrete sidewalks, which meets the standard. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H. states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. A Technical Memorandum by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated November 21, 2003, was submitted by the applicant. The memorandum states that both sight distance and vision clearance can be met. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The proposed shared access is approximately 620 feet north of the proposed alignment of the Bridgeport Road/72n Avenue intersection and 580 feet south of the 72nd Avenue/Durham Road intersection. This access placement meets the criterion. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. A Technical Memorandum by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated November 21, 2003, was submitted by the applicant. The memorandum addresses the requested adjustment to the access standards. The existing 72' Avenue access to the ODOT Park & Ride is proposed to be shared with the new Village Inp Restaurant and Borders Bookstore (Bridgeport Land LLC). There are three accesses off 72' Avenue between Durham Road and Bridgeport Road. The center access does not meet the 600 foot spacing for an Arterial. The applicant is applying for an adjustment to this standard. The proposed shared access will align with the signalized access proposed for the Bridgeport Village development. In order to maintain the center access point for the existing Borders development the memorandum indicates that the access point will become right-in/right-out only. The memorandum states that the right-in/right-out access will not affect safety operations along 72nd Avenue or the Central Access due to the geometry of the roadway and adequate sight distance. The applicant has stated that the center access drive to Borders will be converted to right- in/right-out with the 72' Avenue realignment/improvements. Staff concurs with the requested adjustment to the spacing standards in order to maintain the center access drive. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 6 OF 19 Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 100+ parking spaces is two 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement or one 50-foot access with 40 feet of pavement with curbs. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The existing Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site has approximately 347 parking stalls. According to the standard above, the development is required to have a minimum of two 30-foot wide accesses with 24 feet of pavement. The applicant's proposal is to add a third access to the existing site that is 30-foot wide with 24 feet of pavement. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the access and egress requirements have not been met. If the applicant satisfies the conditions below, the Access and Egress standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Provide copies of the joint use agreement and cross over easements. Provide and implement a plan that shows the proposed walkway at the vehicle access to be constructed with appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant has provided a landscape plan that shoves Commemoration Sugar Maples to be planted as street trees along the newly aligned SW 72' Ave. Sugar Maples grow to a height of approximately 60 feet, which is considered a large tree. The proposed Sugar Maples are shown to be planted no greater than 40 feet apart. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. The proposed access into the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site is at the south end of the subject property, which abuts the Tri-Met and new Village Inn parking areas. Other than the area of construction, the southern property line of the subject site has an existing 40-foot buffer. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 7 OF 19 The parking area is pre-existing with adequate screening ( landscaped islands distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces). Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; The development application is for an additional access to the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site. Therefore, no service facilities are associated with the application. Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The refuse container is pre-existing and will not be affected by this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been satisfied. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, VVaste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Existing mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable collection and storage areas associated with the existing development will not be altered as a result of this application. No new mixed solid waste and source-separated collection and storage areas are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclables shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 8 OF 19 Existing mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable collection and storage areas associated with the existing development will not be altered as a result of this application. No new mixed solid waste and source-separated collection and storage areas are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. Existing mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable collection and storage areas associated with the existing development will not be altered as a result of this application. No new mixed solid waste and source-separated collection and storage areas are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the findings above, the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage standards have previously been satisfied. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street arking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. Parking for the existing Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site is pre-existing. The only change to the parking area is the removal of two parking stalls for the proposed access. The total parking for the site will be 347 spaces. The proposed development does include all or a portion of six new parking spaces, which are designed to serve the proposed Village Inn Restaurant in the City of Tualatin. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loadin spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: T) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application; therefore this standard is not applicable. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e. that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100d10 of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.06 - 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required-for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 9 OF 19 The applicant's proposal is for a new access into the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site. Therefore, no new uses or change of uses are proposed. This standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. Six parking stalls are associated with this application. However, the proposed stalls are for the adjacent Village Inn Restaurant, which is located within the adjacent City of Tualatin. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The only change proposed for the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond parking area is the reduction of two parking stalls. Therefore, no additional ADA parking is required. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision (Chapter 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation Standards). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 10 OF 19 Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision and there are no drop-off edges that require barriers. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the six proposed parking stalls associated with the Village Inn Restaurant to be striped. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has indicated in the narrative that wheel stops at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the proposed parking stalls will be installed. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space"; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. No more than 50% of the required spaces may be compact spaces. The applicant has indicated that two of the six proposed parking stalls will be standard stalls and four will be compact. Therefore, the applicant is providing less than 50% of the proposed stalls as standard stalls. However, there are a total of 80 new parking spaces proposed to serve the Village Inn Restaurant; of which 56 spaces are standard (70%); 21 spaces are compact (26%); and three spaces (4%) are designated for disabled persons. Therefore, this standard is met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed development is providing six parking stalls within the boundaries of the City of Tigard for the Village Inn Restaurant located in the City of Tualatin. Therefore, bicycle parking requirements are referred to the City of Tualatin. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 11 OF 19 required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. As mentioned above, bicycle parking has been addressed by the City of Tualatin. This standard does not apply. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, bicycle parking for the new Village Inn Restaurant has been addressed by the City of Tualatin. No additional bicycle parking is required for the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. The proposed new access drive will not impact the amount or arrangement of parking serving existing retail uses within the City of Tigard. The proposed development does include all or a portion of six new parking spaces, which are designed to serve the proposed Village Inn Restaurant, but which will be located in the City of Tigard. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. No building is proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been satisfied. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780. 130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. No signs have been formally proposed. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal 18.790): Section 18.79 .030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 12 OF 19 The applicant has provided a tree removal plan and Arborist report for the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site. According to the Arborist report, two of the existing 61 trees larger than 12-inches will be removed for the proposed accessway. However, the tree removal plan shows seven street trees to also be removed. Therefore, the applicant is required to resubmit an arborist report and mitigation plan that includes the existing street trees to be removed. The applicant shows tree protection for the trees around the area of impact. However, the City will need to verify that protection measures have been properly installed. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions below, the tree removal standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Revise arborist report to include street trees in the mitigation calculation. Submit detailed tree protection plan for trees around the impact area. The protection plan must be reviewed and approved by the City's Arborist. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant has indicated in the narrative that the intersection of the proposed new access drive with SW 72 Avenue, and the new access and the modified right-in/right-out access will be designed and constructed to provide visual clearance areas in compliance with this standard. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.2 (Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment) 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-Family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces); 18.360.090.10 (Crime prevention and safety); The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.12 (Landscaping); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 13 OF 19 Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The proposed access dive will provide access to the existing Tri-Met Park & Ride lot. Tri-Met has been involved in the development of the proposed design. Sidewalks and crosswalks have been provided to facilitate pedestrian accessibility and transit use. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard is satisfied. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Chapter 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires an arterial street to have a 104 foot right-of-way (ROW) width and 72-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue, which is classified as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. Southwest 72nd Avenue is currently being realigned in conjunction with the Bridgeport Village project. The ROW dedications and/or transfers required for those improvements will be done with that project. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to roviding adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. The proposal is for a new access into the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site. No blocks are being created with this project. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 14 OF 19 Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. No new streets are being proposed with this application. The proposal is for a new access into the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. No new lots are being created with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. The subject parcel has approximately 680 feet of frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The applicant has indicated that sidewalks will be provided along both sides of the realigned 72r'd Avenue. The applicant has also shown that the new shared access will have sidewalks along both sides of the access drive up to the Tri-Met Park & Ride facility. This meets the criterion. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. A public sever line extension in 72nd is being constructed in conjunction with the Bridgeport Village, 72" Avenue realignment, and Village Inn projects. A service lateral will be provided to serve the Village Inn. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 15 OF 19 There are no upstream drainage areas. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The stormwater runoff from the Village Inn site will be collected, treated and discharged to the public system within the City of Tualatin. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is approximately 685 lineal feet (although, the applicant indicates that approximately 330 feet of the lines along the frontage will be placed underground along with the 72nd Avenue construction); therefore the fee would be $12,425.00. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 16 OF 19 ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: A Technical Memorandum regarding the access adjustment for the retention of the existing central access for Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 was prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated November 21, 2003. The access spacing standard for an Arterial cannot be met with the retention of the existing central access. The applicant has requested an adjustment to the spacing standard and will provide construction changes necessary to make the central access a right-In/right-out only. The driveway change must be made with the Village Inn construction project or the 72' Avenue construction project for the criterion to be met. Public Water System: No changes to the public water system are proposed. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. However, traffic impact fees are based on use and square footage. The proposal is for a new access and additional parking stalls. Therefore, no traffic impact fees are required. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Public Works has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: 1 . Place note regarding easements to pot hole existing utilities "Water, etc." to center in the easement. 2. Is the City of Tigard serving the site? If so we need more clarification on needs (fire, irrigation). 3. It is important to have access to these vaults at all times. What about underground power and phone for telemetry? NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 17 OF 19 The City of Tigard Urban Forester has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: 1. Trees already removed. It is not clear to me which trees are going to be preserved. Walt Knapp says that 61 trees will be saved, but where are the trees? The City of Tigard Building Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS City of Tualatin City Administrator has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: I have no negative comments related to the proposed new entrance on SW 72nd to the Village Inn, Park & Ride and Borders. However, one of the ancillary goals of Bridgeport Village has bees] to improve traffic flow on SW 72' and Upper Boones Ferry Road. New signage on SW 72', north of the new entrance should be considered as well as the signage at the entrance itself. In background meetings over the past two years, I have mentioned that the improvements to the SW 72n /Bridgeport Road intersection and the corresponding improvements to the 1-5 interchange (290) need to be promoted by signage for traffic heading south on Upper Boones Ferry Road from the Carman Drive interchange. Minimally, 1-5 route signs need to be placed on Upper Boones Ferry Road at SW 72nd and Durham Road intersections. Unless a driver is familiar with the area, it is exceptionally easy to miss the left turn opportunities to make a more direct access to the 1-5 Interchange as opposed to continuing south on Upper Boones Ferry to Bridgeport Road. Although it might not be the proper reference, it appears that extra signage could be requested based on provisions in Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvements Standards), 18.810.030 Z. Street name signs. Street name signs shall be installed at all street intersections. Stop signs and other signs may be required. Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: The existing service line crosses the lot from SW 70th Avenue right-of-way. Relocate the water meter to SW 69th Avenue right-of-way. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 5, 2004 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 20, 2004 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 18 OF 19 Appteg The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type Ill Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON MAY 19, 2004. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. • rr ��,�<<. Z May 2004 PREPARE hew S,dieldegger DATE Associate Planner Ma y 5, 2004 APPROVED BY: Richard H. B wersdorff DATE Planning M ger i:\curpin\mathew\sdr\sdr2003-00017decision.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 19 OF 19 • .._________ 'To E CIT o ,. 11 Siii411L.11 OE0 0 RAPNIC INF ORMATION SYSTEM nc�Nrrr map SI gØPP \0 h SDR2003-00011 VAR2003-00109/III 1 VILLAGE INN �� PARKING & ACCESS o ig/ • ORS fER' Cr SITE. f ,�<< RO Nom: . ..■ iv ! % BI�BONII 6,MO F BEND �_... 1; T(-/ BEE __��� 0.lN,L9J�7 C• p AI a �•pg Tqa d Area Map ..01 . N to If Al 44* li 0 200 100 UUO Feel III 1 ra 189 feel 0 I, _.4.4„,..,,N, 'P� City of Tigard c� 4 SW BRIDGED 5� Information on this map is for general location only and 0 . SW NVOIr- should be verified with the Development Services Division. 73725 SW Hall223 Tigard,(503)OR 97723 (503)6344771 http://www.ci.hgard.or.us 1 Community Development Plot date: Mar 18,2004;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR Access s��rrrrrn - - - �t-- . s �tiri r. 1 1 1 1 1- i BORDERS BOOKS/BED,BATH AND BEYOND(TL 1700) LOOSItiD CB/IRAL Alli, r�ACCESS IEH.::-111-8-4 1'-••—I EXISTING LOTAREA = 309,967 p.R PROPOSED ROHM/NOIR OUT' b ,_"_ Ty r:r�t��l' I ■i i _- ® EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA 68,539 p.R(22X-LANDSCAPE COVERAGE) %�/ LANDSCAPE AREAS REMOVED •1.970 aq.t. I Ep _,° �J �� a.. REMAINING LANDSCAPE AREA =66,569 sq.IL(21%-LANDSCAPE COVERAGE) - _ PROPERTY lAf -�-- iii-: `_"` • EXISTING BUILDING AREA •f 71,000 ^fie— - = a EXISTING NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES =349 4f/ REMAINING NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS •347-APPROX.5 SPACES/1,000 T.:::'i ;.;1;;— C -J PROPERTY TJE / j /,; -___ [�'.'^�? APPROXIMATE AREA TO BE VACATED AND • 3,677 sq.ft. PROPOSED + /, _-'-- _ r�'�-'a ADDED TO TA7(LOT 1700 —-1 T/510113N OD.OT. 1••:..::..i..- . .ice �liil�i i, ,� / PROPOORY OM-MED/ s� R) TOK i VILLAGE INN REAMED JAY I' - 1 1 I ;`// TOTAL AREA WITH TIGARD CITY • .k. ttI �.,-- ,. ___ ;y :'.:% ::1 LIMITS =2.191 p.IL 4g1 :-. 4,' I, '‘.S.S‘''''s IN P/ •'-!v+aunT NEW LANDSCAPING WITHIN TIGARD CITY ."4::' :C •� ry}O f V LIMITS 8LANDSCAPECOVERAGE) lam Ef PARKING SPACEITHIN TID \ i ;N; �.�;' ,� I I� / � PROPOSED NEW LANDSCAPING 3.298 p.R go�,v D D 13R�O�'ieOwtT S1' C m or TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD T SDR2003-00017/VAR2003-00109 SITE PLAN N VILLAGE INN PARKING AND ACCESS (Map is not to scale) 1 V TYPE- I4II+ ISION ra CITY OF TIGARD 1 L lGE INN ► Es AND P KING Community Deveropment SkapingA 13etterCommunity 120 DAYS = 7/14/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00017 Development Adjustment (VAR) VAR2003-00109 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Borders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access & Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Borders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. APPLICANT: Bridgeport Village, LLC OWNER: Bridgeport Land, LLC Bruce Wood, Opus Northwest, LLC Attn: Selwyn Bingham 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1130 3939 NW St. Helens Rd. Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97210 OWNER: ODOT, Region 1 Roger Hansen, Right-of-way Supervisor 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209 LOCATION: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limed to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, CRITERIA: 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is thereby`; given that 4:0f}'Tiga ° ,mun1:0tY eveIpprrient}Director's designee has 4Pf fED the-.above:requgsO e o"certain C� itis�of�prgyaI Tf1 findings and conclusions at��Which t 'e deem ion is t as+ erepQte6'u -he full d i , a ileble'at City H 1. T PPROYA S l.�, VAL.�t 1 1 ON'I S F 9M H '1 D#1 I: I ,I E°E�Ft=�filg �4F 1'tII All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25C) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 5, 2004 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 20, 2004 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A eal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MAY 19, 2004. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheideqqer at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. I.ff �� . .. 9 \\I , h [. VICINITY/1AP Ir , LLL -_11fr \r _ - � _r - __ I �--- - ---_ i VILLAGE INN ZIT. ___�------- � - PARKING & ACCESS _i___.______/ 4. \\., 7.----- __ i F 1,14-wilillf ' , ) \- ---.._.:___ - 4 ipww-. . ,:,• • r 1 Q l_____�f Cige® ri [jr` - '4 #41 40.446 , Air A/PA 7-`1".- e. piiiiii441 illr : • i ,.:., _......___ _ ,..........„...., , .. . .....:.; ... ................ .....,,,,..,...,...._ , ,,, ,, ;...... ,._ . , ,./ _6.1.....,.......ov. .1.,.... ► . = gym ,Mz, ; t-- r�;. ® ; --- .,....• / .:-=----., ►_ CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2003-00017/VAR2003-00109 SITE PLAN N VILLAGE INN PARKING AND ACCESS (Mao Is not to scale) NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CI„AL TIGARD OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: March 19, 2004 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00017 Type II Land Use Application ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2003-00109 FILE NAME: VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Boarders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Boarders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2, 2004. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideqger, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to matts(ci.tigard.or.us. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 29, 2004. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." „ Wili* ••Co 11/1 VICINITY MAP /4133 .tl 1111 I I SDR2003-00017 11111 Ilk VAR2003-00109 ___ I VILLAGE INN � .�� ---- - \ mi. . PARKING & ACCESS • • . -7 \\.x .01. I no ,..,41 „, .,, 1 an ,s ,... , ,,,,,,A4 -\ I • , ,„447*Vilig''''''1 ekta, -044 0 1 IIPIPPP' # "....'”' ..'1‘;c1'1'di I ararw 1 ---1 v-V4 „ ''m izz p41,,,,* 4 Aimi 0 200_1 ..,.. if Q City of Tigard . .aiY �•� . B� Al I uaswra .a.n a.rug e.e.ao� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 4/21/04 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Associate Planner FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR2003-00017 Village Inn Access and Parking Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. A Technical Memorandum by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated November 21, 2003, was submitted by the applicant. The memorandum states that both sight distance and vision clearance can be met. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The proposed shared access is approximately 620 feet north of the proposed alignment of the Bridgeport Road/72nd Avenue intersection and 580 feet south of the 72nd Avenue/Durham Road intersection. This access placement meets the criterion. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00017 Village Inn Access & Parking PAGE 1 driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. A Technical Memorandum by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated November 21, 2003, was submitted by the applicant. The memorandum addresses the requested adjustment to the access standards. The existing 72nd Avenue access to the ODOT Park & Ride is proposed to be shared with the new Village Inn Restaurant and Borders Bookstore (Bridgeport Land LLC). There are three accesses off 72nd Avenue between Durham Road and Bridgeport Road. The center access does not meet the 600 foot spacing for an Arterial. The applicant is applying for an adjustment to this standard. The proposed shared access will align with the signalized access proposed for the Bridgeport Village development. In order to maintain the center access point for the existing Borders development the memorandum indicates that the access point will become right-in/right-out only. The memorandum states that the right-in/right-out access will not affect safety operations along 72nd Avenue or the Central Access due to the geometry of the roadway and adequate sight distance. The applicant has stated that the center access drive will be converted to right- in/right-out with the 72nd Avenue realignment/improvements. Staff concurs with the requested adjustment to the spacing standards in order to maintain the center access drive. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires an arterial street to have a 104 foot right-of-way width and 72-foot paved section. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00017 Village Inn Access & Parking PAGE 2 Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue, which is classified as an Arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. SW 72nd is currently being realigned in conjunction with the Bridgeport Village project. The ROW dedications and/or transfers required for those improvements will be done with that project. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. PLANNING ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00017 Village Inn Access & Parking PAGE 3 Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The applicant has indicated that sidewalks will be provided along both sides of the realigned 72nd Avenue. The applicant has also shown that the new shared access will have sidewalks along both sides of the access drive up to the Tri-Met Park & Ride facility. This meets the criterion. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. A public sewer line extension in 72nd is being constructed in conjunction with the Bridgeport Village, 72nd Avenue realignment and Village Inn projects. A service lateral will be provided to serve the Village Inn. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00017 Village Inn Access & Parking PAGE 4 outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage areas. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The stormwater runoff from the Village Inn site will be collected, treated and discharged to the public system within the City of Tualatin. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00017 Village Inn Access & Parking PAGE 5 • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is approximately 685 lineal feet (although, the applicant indicates that approximately 330 feet of the lines along the frontage will be placed underground along with the 72nd Avenue construction); therefore the fee would be $ 12,425.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: A Technical Memorandum regarding the access adjustment for the retention of the existing central access for Tax Lot 2S113AD01700 was prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated November 21, 2003. The access spacing standard for an Arterial cannot be met with the retention of the existing central access. The applicant has requested an adjustment to the spacing standard and will provide construction changes necessary to make the central access a right-in/right-out only. The driveway change must be made with the Village Inn construction project or the 72nd Avenue construction project for the criterion to be met. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00017 Village Inn Access & Parking PAGE 6 Public Water System: No changes to the public water system are proposed. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: The existing central access to the Bridgeport Land, LLC (Borders) shall be configured to provide right-in/right-out only turning movements. Plans shall be reviewed by the Engineering Department. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: • ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00017 Village Inn Access & Parking PAGE 7 REQUEST FOR COMMENT V CITO HOARD Community(Development SFiaping)4 Better Community E: March 19,2004 TO: City of Durham City Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x2437] Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRJ 2003-00017/ADJUSTMENT[VAR)2003-00109 VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Boarders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Boarders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. LOCATION: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: "ommunit Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 3.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 2, 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: �( V11e have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. X Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: 4:72)6_L L vA),D v,s i - ^ City of Durham 17160 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. e-mail:cityofdurham @comcastnet 14 P.O. Box 23483, Durham Oregon 97281 (503)639-6851 Fax(503)598-8595 Roel C. Lundquist-City Administrator/Recorder Linda Smith-Administrative Assistant March 23, 2004 Mathew Scheidegger City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Comments on SDR 2003-00017 -Village Inn Access and Parking I have no negative comments related to the proposed new entrance on SW 72nd to the Village Inn, Park & Ride and Borders. However, one of the ancillary goals of Bridgeport Village has been to improve traffic flow on SW 72' and Upper Boones Ferry Road. New signage on SW 72"d, north of the new entrance should be considered as well as the signage at the entrance itself. In background meetings over the past two years, I have mentioned that the improvements to the SW 72"d/Bridgeport Road intersection and the corresponding improvements to the 1-5 Interchange (290) need to be promoted by signage for traffic heading south on Upper Boones Ferry Road from the Carman Drive interchange. Minimally, 1-5 route signs need to be placed on Upper Boones Ferry Road at SW 72"d and Durham Road intersections. Unless a driver is familiar with the area, it is exceptionally easy to miss the left turn opportunities to make a more direct access to the I-5 Interchange as opposed to continuing south on Upper Boones Ferry to Bridgeport Road. Although it might not be the proper reference, it appears that extra signage could be requested based on provisions in Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards), 18.810.030 Z. Street name signs. Street name signs shall be installed at all street intersections. Stop signs and other signs may be required(emphasis added). Sincerely, /4:4 Roel C. Lundquist City Administrator Villagelnn Signage Comments to Tigard 0323-04.doc / c REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: March 19,2004 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Brian Rager,Public Works Engineering Manager APR 0 5 2004 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x2431) Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: 15031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDB)2003-00017/ADJUSTMENT[VAR)2003-00109 VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING r REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Boarders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Boarders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. LOCATION: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72' Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except t where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 2, 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: . , . 3 2 i 4- A5 vJAS Ntc vCF--kC111) .) -tt-�S , O y o c"-Ak,e-rrr 5 LAN)? 7,e7 f%f-A1=G6fDril --ro / 12,41- p.A Cx 3/31 bit! y [I -63 e &L2 ( tc rrsardcrc ecoer►,•awts 41 a4;o-\-tu%,S L►- ? VWLit (-^4•A I' G+t l - 1.17144 et.+a t Z— 5- `7/(t /14-k & ,1 - ri 5 3" we C / S'L( Q,e c i €r. ) /era jed we wT// g'evuc YRi.c45.iyutcitt,.c I —T-1 h re, kt lwf Q um ,L -�,k K c/ „- r. i oC 744"44-7 7• . • , ik i&In/ 1 Q 62._a r G 70 S �/ t``- t.��j G r 5-4 ,121¢`.7 Matt Scheidegger- SDR 2003-00017, \' 'e Inn Access Page 1 From: Brian Rager To: Matt Scheidegger Date: 4/2/04 4:11 PM Subject: SDR 2003-00017, Village Inn Access Here are our comments on this one: 1. Utility plan was poor. Very unclear and hard to read. 2. We assume there will not be any new utility work with this effort. 3. We will want to make sure that when they pothole our water lines, that if they find them to not be centered inside of easements, that they make adjustments to easements such that the lines will be centered. 4. We have talked with the City of Tualatin and are in agreement that the City of Tigard will serve this site with water. We will eventually need fire suppression, domestic and irrigation needs for the development. But I assume the actual development application will come through later. 5. Regarding existing infrastructure. We will need to make sure that we have access to our vaults at all times. We may also need to have them run some new conduit for phone and power into the vault that may get adjusted in the process. More detailed review will come during the construction plan review. Thanks. Brian D. Rager Public Works Engineering Manager City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503/639-4171, Ext. 2471 E-mail: brianr @ci.tigard.or.us REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITFTGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: March 19,2004 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Public Works Annex MAR 3 1 2004 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner(x2437) Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: (5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2003-00017/ADJUSTMENT(VAR)2003-00109 VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Boarders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Boarders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. LOCATION: 16800 SW 72"d Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 2, 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. X Written comments provided below: -1 s Ai_RE Y , /r /s gc7 c LE14R re ME W it'Cif- t E-ES PrRC- 40fi✓G rt? FEE PREEIRvED , JP-LT KAIA-PP SAYS 71-FAT (c ( r12 Et=S W{LL t3E 3M. Elo AT uJ l*E'_E Alik tH CD( tt-E-5S Name & Number of Person Commenting: M 511 APC 411111% WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON Ulodepartment of Land Use and Transportation,Land Development Services 155 North First Avenue,Suite 350 13,Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 (503)846-8761 FAX:(603)846-2908 RECEIVED PLANNING March 31, 2004 Matthew Scheidegger The City of Tigard MAR 3 1 2004 Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard CITY OF TIGARD Tigard, OR 97223 Fax: (503) 684-7297 No. of Pages: 1 RE: Village Inn Access and Parking City File Number: SDR 2003-00017; VAR 2003-00109 Location: SW 72nd Avenue Tax Map and Lot Number: 2S1 13 AD/ 1700 NH --i': r - L --low LI ---...._. 411 if 1Pr, li min i 1 +... ed 251]3AD01700r1 Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has received materials regarding the above noted development application but will not be submitting any requirements/conditions. Although the project site is adjacent to County maintained road sections, it is not expected to seriously impact any county roadways. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. if you have any questions, please contact me at 503-846-3842. PA"-P Phil Healy Senior Planner TO 'd 82:S1 1700Z 12 J?W 8062-9178-2OS:XLI '(1]Q QNH1 O0 HSdf'l REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIAO TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: March 19,2004 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Brian Blalock,Commercial Plans Examiner MAR 3 1 2004 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24311 Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SORT 2003-00017/ADJUSTMENT[VARI 2003-00109 VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Boarders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Boarders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. LOCATION: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except t where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 2, 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: OR 1�1/� B L&oc- Cir 2,t f-3 6 ,_ ilk REQUEST FOR CITY Community CDeve(opment Shaping Better Community DATE: March 19,2004 CITY OF TUALATIN RECEIVED PLANNING TO: City of Tualatin Planning Manager RECEIVED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division MAR 2 5 2004 APR 0 6 2004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF TIGA STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate PlannmairMAD Th6V l[0'b3)639-4111/Fax: [50316: ,-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)2003-00011/ADJUSTMENT[VAR)2003-00109 VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Boarders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Boarders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. LOCATION: 16800 SW 72' Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 2 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. i% Please refer to the enclosed letter. V Written comments provided below: ( -f.isurQ,. Ai erc rt re, Pecse Ave r,- be-rw r` pro pert .i +r- Ac.c.as� n0 _ (2) ez,,►ft ?ro-t L�'iov -vr -rte iD be pre ser,ie�ah'HU , 1Tc. `C Y\11°r te.;STIrdl NI\65 ;1t-lief S otJ NOrt. er-avert) 1.4.11.e p. N -tap 1-\ vA c o W-CyQ, 0 she A11 A C i t a PlAb ,c TAc,\,-t,es ()iv\m c- i L_O,Lev) Name & Number of Person Commenting: lit LuiAAN. c-}wi( 43 octATC-aanr�yC Sa3661 I`-'OZT] PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS: The following are the Public Facilities findings for AR 03-09— Bridgeport Village: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: PFR-58 The applicant shall dedicate the necessary right-of-way for the realignment of SW 72nd Avenue, between the SW Bridgeport Road/SW 72nd Avenue/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection and the SW 72nd Avenue/ Tri-Met P&R//Br.d gepo_a Village intersection. Dedication cation shall be to Washington County, and the applicant shall submit to the City of Tualatin a copy of the recorded document(s) for permanent record. PFR-59 The applicant shall dedicate the necessary right-of-way for the realignment of SW 72nd Avenue, between the SW 72nd Avenue/ Tri-Met P&R//Bridgeport Village intersection and the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Durham Road intersection. Dedication shall be to Washington County, and the applicant shall submit to the City of Tualatin a copy of the recorded document(s) for permanent record. PFR-60 The applicant shall obtain all necessary easements for the installation of the SW 72nd Avenue/Tri-Met P&R/Bridgeport Village signalized intersection. The applicant shall submit to the City of Tualatin a copy of the recorded document(s) for permanent record. PFR-61 The applicant shall obtain an access easement for the portion of proposed drive aisle that encroaches on the neighboring property, where Borders Bookstore is located. The applicant shall submit to the City of Tualatin a copy of the recorded document(s) for permanent record. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community'Development Shaping Wetter Community DATE: March 19,2004 RECEIVED PLANK N TO: Barbara Shields,Long Range Planning Manage\PR 0 7 2004 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division C�-y OF TIGARD N-� STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner(x2437) Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISM 2003-00011/ADJUSTMENT(VAR)2003-00109 VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Boarders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Boarders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. LOCATION: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 2, 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Veve(opment ShapingA Better Community DATE: March 19,2004 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Richard Jackson,Qwest Communications Engineering MAR 3 0 2004 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24311 Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2003-00017/ADJUSTMENT[VAR)2003-00109 VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Boarders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Boarders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. LOCATION: 16800 SW 72 Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72r'd Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 2, 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ,eC 7C C /S .t/(17' /A+/ / E ( tA/6---S 7 /-:64 A/C a/SG"- /- Name & Number of Person Commenting. .TA-C ieSaA) 6-03_a Z,7 S6 0 P REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community Deve1opment Shaping Better Community DATE: March 19,2004 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer MAR 2 6 2004 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner(x24311 Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: (5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDR)2003-00017/ADJUSTMENT(VAR)2003-00109 VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING r REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Boarders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Boarders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. LOCATION: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 2, 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: a ,NOCI\ i z5‘101 4.14 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIIGARD Community Deve(opment S(aping A Better Community DATE: March 19,2004 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x2437) Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 2003-00017/ADJUSTMENT[VAR)2003-00109 VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Boarders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Boarders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. LOCATION: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 2, 2004. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: TY OF TIGARD REQUEST FO ;OMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: ?171e 2z0 9/ FILE NAME: ///, ��i..c,11 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central kEast ❑South ❑West OProposal Descrip. in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs.CA.-POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official rENGINEERING DEPT./Kim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer�r PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester 1 _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder PUBLIC WORKS'Brian Rager,Engineering Manager -/PLANNER-POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.r►"TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* _ CLEANWATER SERVICES * Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * 7LCITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Melinda Wood — Irish Bunnell,Development Services 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE 14 CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(ZCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. _ Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Comp Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY * _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager X C.D. Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedines in Area) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transported< Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N. First Avenue X CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Steve Conway(General APPS I Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(cau) OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Brent Curtis(CPA) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) Marah Danielson,Development Review Coordinator _Doria Mateja(ZCA)Ms 14 Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Sr.CartographerlcewzcAiMS14 1900 SW 4th Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY _ODOT, REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A * _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION _STATE HISTORIC Dave Austin(wcccA)"911"(m...,(.,.....) Jane Estes,Permit Specialist (Notify if ODOT RJR-Hwy.Crossing is Only Access to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Craig Reiley (Notify if Property Has HD Overlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221-2414 555-13th Street,NE,Suite 3 1115 Commercial Street,NE Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301-1012 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 —SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _COMCAST CABLE CORP. L TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Randy Bice (Sae Map for Arse come.) (If Project is Within%Mile of a Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 '- PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC >NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY —VERIZON ., QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Richard Jackson,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 -• , e,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 4111,' TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE CORP. Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev s.nv0ro,A,seca,ra<„ Diana Carpenter,Apps E ofoavN or 99w1 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Portland,OR 97232 * I r *T-ES_AUTOMATIC 9TIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED' 25-Feb-04) (Also update-."i-.\curpin\setup\labels\annexation_utilities and franchises.doc"when updating this document) MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF T CARD Community Development S(lapin g/?Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard;Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2003-00017/VAR2003-00109 — VILLAGE INN ACCESS & PARKING ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on May 5,2004, and deposited in the United States Mail on May 5,2004, postage prepaid. Ail vo- (Person t at Prep-red Notice) / SOFFE Of 04EgON County Washington )ss Iwan Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the iVe" I day of �� t / , 2004. OFFICIAL SEAL Pi SUE ROSS ive, NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.375152 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC.1,2007 (44V-r NOT '■' I BLIC OF OREGON fl My .om I ission Expires: iot EXHIBIT, A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00017 CITY OF TIGARD VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING Community Development Shaping.A Better Community 120 DAYS = 7/14/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00017 Development Adjustment (VAR) VAR2003-00109 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Borders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access & Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Borders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. APPLICANT: Bridgeport Village, LLC OWNER: Bridgeport Land, LLC Bruce Wood, Opus Northwest, LLC Attn: Selwyn Bingham 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1130 3939 NW St. Helens Rd. Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97210 OWNER: ODOT, Region 1 Roger Hansen, Right-of-way Supervisor 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209 LOCATION: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the Oregon Department gf Transportation (ODOT) right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72nu Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limed to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini- warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 1 OF 19 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the 15lanning Division (Mat>l' ew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 2428) for review and approval: 1 . Revise arborist report to include street trees in the mitigation calculation. 2. Submit detailed tree protection plan for trees around the impact area. The protection plan must be reviewed and approved by the City's Arborist. 3. Provide and implement a plan that shows the proposed walkway at the vehicle access to be constructed with appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials. 4. Provide evidence that the proposed street vacations for the realignment of SW 72nd Avenue have been recorded. 5. Provide copies of the joint use agreement and cross over easements. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL INSPECTION: -Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillian, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 6. The existing central access to the Bridgeport Land, LLC (Borders) shall be configured to provide right-in/right-out only turning movements. Plans shall be reviewed by the Engineering Department. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of city records for the subject property and found the original Site Development Review approval (SDR93-00017) for a 68,000 square foot grocery store. No other land-use cases are associated with the subject parcel. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located between Interstate 5 and SW 72nd Avenue. The subject property is zoned (C-G) General Commercial and is surrounded by (I-L) light industrial and (MUC-1) Mixed Use Commercial. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant, Opus Northwest, is responsible for the relocation of the existing Village Inn Restaurant from its present location to the proposed site. The new Village Inn site will be located in the northeast corner of the new SW Bridgeport Road/SW 72nd Avenue/Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection, just to the east of the Bridgeport Village Development. The realignment of SW 72n Avenue/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road and the provision of access to the Tri-Met Park & Ride facility and Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 (Borders Bookstore) has been the subject of considerable participation and negotiation on behalf of all of the affected parties. Access to this area will be through a shared signalized intersection off SW 72nd Avenue. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET No comments were received. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 2 OF 19 SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. Zoning Districts 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.370 Variances and Adjustments 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal 18.795 Visual Clearance C. Specific SDR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Decision Making Procedures 18.390 Impact Study SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICTS Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial zoning district. The applicant is proposing to add an additional access to the existing Borders Bookstore\Bed Bath & Beyond retail stores, which are permitted uses within the C-G zoning district. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Minimum Lot Size None - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft Minimum Setbacks - Front yard - -Side facing street on corner &through lots - -Side yard 0/20 ft [8] - Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - Rear yard 0/20 ft [1] - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or private street. - Maximum Height 45 ft Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% Minimum Floor Area Ratio - Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% [1]no setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zone. [2]includes all buildings and impervious area NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 3 OF 19 This application is for the construction of a new access and landscaping for the existing Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond. The impacts of the new access will reduce the site's landscaping by 1,970 square feet. However, the site's total landscaping will be 21%, which is above the minimum requirement. No changes to the existing structures or their setbacks are required with this application. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the underlying zone's development criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Variances and Adjustments (18.370): Adjustment to access and egress standards (18.705): In all zoning districts where access and egress drives cannot be readily designed to conform to Code standards within a particular parcel, access with an adjoining property shall be considered. If access in conjunction with another parcel cannot reasonably be achieved, the Director may grant an adjustment to the access requirements of Chapter 18.705 through a Type II procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria contained in Subsection 2b below. The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirements contained in Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: (1) There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; 2 The access sepaoemt b 3 The request is the rati minimum rquire adjustment ens required cannot e met;to provide adequate access; 4 The approval access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; and (5) The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met. The applicant is seeking an adjustment to the Access and Egress standards of Section 18.705.030(H)(3). There are currently two accesses into the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial center off of SW 72' Avenue between Durham Road and Bridgeport Road. The center access does not meet the 600-foot spacing for an arterial. The proposed shared access will align with the signalized access proposed for the Bridgeport Village development. In order to maintain the center access point for the existing Borders development, the applicant indicates that the access point will become right-in/right-out only. A Technical Memorandum by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated November 21, 2003, was submitted by the applicant. The memorandum addresses the requested adjustment to the access standards. The memorandum stags that the right-in/right-out access will not affect safety operations along SW 72' Avenue or the central access of the Borders/Bed Bath and Beyond due to the geometry of the roadway and adequate sight distance. The applicant has stated that the center access drive will be converted to right-in/right-out with the SW 72' Avenue realignment/improvements. It is not possible to share access; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 4 OF 19 The existing full-unsignalized central access is proposed to be modified to a right-in/right-out access to accommodate the proposed signalized shared access to the south. The shared access provides indirect access to the site, which is out of direction, and does not compliment the existing site layout (i.e. front door location, parking lot layout, etc.). The existing retail uses will still be required to gain an access easement through ODOT for crossing their property (Tri-Met). Retaining the existing Central Access (although limited to right-in/right movements only) will better serve the community and will minimize the impact to traffic operations and safety at the internal intersection on the Tri-Met Park & Ride facility. The shared signalized access to the south will only be required to accommodate the left-turns prohibited at the existing central access. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. According to the narrative, the property owners have agreed to a series of property transfers in order to establish the new parcel configuration and have agreed to joint use of the proposed new access drive off of SW 72n° Ave. Legal evidence in the form of easements will establish joint use. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide copies of the joint use agreement. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The Borders\Bed Bath & Beyond complex has two existing accesses that connect to SW 72nd Avenue. The new access to the site will also have direct access to SW 72' Avenue through the new access to the Tri-Met Park and Ride and Village Inn Restaurant. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Walkways: 18.705.030(F) requires that on-site pedestrian walkways comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; On site pedestrian walkways are pre-existing between the building entrance and SW 72nd Avenue that provide access and egress as well as to the parking lot. This standard is met. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety . Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The submitted plans show a walkway to cross the proposed access drive for a distance of 40 feet. The standard above allows crosswalks to be greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are included. Therefore, the applicant must provide and implement a plan that shows the proposed NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 5 OF 19 walkway at the vehicle access to be constructed with appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts concrete sidewalks, which meets the standard. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.765.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. A Technical Memorandum by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated November 21 , 2003, was submitted by the applicant. The memorandum states that both sight distance and vision clearance can be met. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The proposed shared access is approximately 620 feet north of the proposed alignment of the Bridgeport Road/72n Avenue intersection and 580 feet south of the 72nd Avenue/Durham Road intersection. This access placement meets the criterion. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. A Technical Memorandum by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated November 21, 2003, was submitted by the applicant. The memorandum addresses the requested adjustment to the access standards. The existing 72' Avenue access to the ODOT Park & Ride is proposed to be shared with the new Village Inn Restaurant and Borders Bookstore (Bridgeport Land LLC). There are three accesses off 72' Avenue between Durham Road and Bridgeport Road. The center access does not meet the 600 foot spacing for an Arterial. The applicant is applying for an adjustment to this standard. The proposed shared access will align with the signalized access proposed for the Bridgeport Village development. In order to maintain the center access point for the existing Borders development the memorandum indicates that the access point will become right-in/right-out only. The memorandum states that the right-in/right-out access will not affect safety operations along 72nd Avenue or the Central Access due to the geometry of the roadway and adequate sight distance. The applicant has stated that the center access drive to Borders will be converted to right- in/right-out with the 72' Avenue realignment/improvements. Staff concurs with the requested adjustment to the spacing standards in order to maintain the center access drive. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 6 OF 19 Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 100+ parking spaces is two 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement or one 50-foot access with 40 feet of pavement with curbs. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The existing Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site has approximately 347 parking stalls. According to the standard above, the development is required to have a minimum of two 30-foot wide accesses with 24 feet of pavement. The applicant's proposal is to add a third access to the existing site that is 30-foot wide with 24 feet of pavement. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the access and egress requirements have not been met. If the applicant satisfies the conditions below, the Access and Egress standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Provide copies of the joint use agreement and cross over easements. Provide and implement a plan that shows the proposed walkway at the vehicle access to be constructed with appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant has provided a landscape plan that shoves Commemoration Sugar Maples to be planted as street trees along the newly aligned SW 72' Ave. Sugar Maples grow to a height of approximately 60 feet, which is considered a large tree. The proposed Sugar Maples are shown to be planted no greater than 40 feet apart. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. The proposed access into the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site is at the south end of the subject property, which abuts the Tri-Met and new Village Inn parking areas. Other than the area of construction, the southern property line of the subject site has an existing 40-foot buffer. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 7 OF 19 The parking area is pre-existing with adequate screening ( landscaped islands distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces). Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; The development application is for an additional access to the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site. Therefore, no service facilities are associated with the application. Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The refuse container is pre-existing and will not be affected by this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been satisfied. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Existing mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable collection and storage areas associated with the existing development will not be altered as a result of this application. No new mixed solid waste and source-separated collection and storage areas are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclables shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 8 OF 19 Existing mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable collection and storage areas associated with the existing development will not be altered as a result of this application. No new mixed solid waste and source-separated collection and storage areas are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. Existing mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable collection and storage areas associated with the existing development will not be altered as a result of this application. No new mixed solid waste and source-separated collection and storage areas are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the findings above, the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage standards have previously been satisfied. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street arking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up.to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parkin] spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. Parking for the existing Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site is pre-existing. The only change to the parking area is the removal of two parking stalls for the proposed access. The total parking for the site will be 347 spaces. The proposed development does include all or a portion of six new parking spaces, which are designed to serve the proposed Village Inn Restaurant in the City of Tualatin. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: T) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application; therefore this standard is not applicable. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e. that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the at 100d10 of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.06 ; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required-for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 9 OF 19 The applicant's proposal is for a new access into the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site. Therefore, no new uses or change of uses are proposed. This standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 lonc-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. Six parking stalls are associated with this application. However, the proposed stalls are for the adjacent Village Inn Restaurant, which is located within the adjacent City of Tualatin. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The only change proposed for the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond parking area is the reduction of two parking stalls. Therefore, no additional ADA parking is required. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision (Chapter 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation Standards). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 10 OF 19 Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision and there are no drop-off edges that require barriers. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the six proposed parking stalls associated with the Village Inn Restaurant to be striped. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has indicated in the narrative that wheel stops at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the proposed parking stalls will be installed. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space"; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. No more than 50% of the required spaces may be compact spaces. The applicant has indicated that two of the six proposed parking stalls will be standard stalls and four will be compact. Therefore, the applicant is providing less than 50% of the proposed stalls as standard stalls. However, there are a total of 80 new parking spaces proposed to serve the Village Inn Restaurant; of which 56 spaces are standard (70%); 21 spaces are compact (26%); and three spaces (4%) are designated for disabled persons. Therefore, this standard is met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed development is providing six parking stalls within the boundaries of the City of Tigard for the Village Inn Restaurant located in the City of Tualatin. Therefore, bicycle parking requirements are referred to the City of Tualatin. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 11 OF 19 required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. As mentioned above, bicycle parking has been addressed by the City of Tualatin. This standard does not apply. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, bicycle parking for the new Village Inn Restaurant has been addressed by the City of Tualatin. No additional bicycle parking is required for the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. The proposed new access drive will not impact the amount or arrangement of parking serving existing retail uses within the City of Tigard. The proposed development does include all or a portion of six new parking spaces, which are designed to serve the proposed Village Inn Restaurant, but which will be located in the City of Tigard. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. No building is proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been satisfied. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. No signs have been formally proposed. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal 18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 12 OF 19 The applicant has provided a tree removal plan and Arborist report for the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site. According to the Arborist report, two of the existing 61 trees larger than 12-inches will be removed for the proposed accessway. However, the tree removal plan shows seven street trees to also be removed. Therefore, the applicant is required to resubmit an arborist report and mitigation plan that includes the existing street trees to be removed. The applicant shows tree protection for the trees around the area of impact. However, the City will need to verify that protection measures have been properly installed. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions below, the tree removal standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Revise arborist report to include street trees in the mitigation calculation. Submit detailed tree protection plan for trees around the impact area. The protection plan must be reviewed and approved by the City's Arborist. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this areas all be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant has indicated in the narrative that the intersection of the proposed new access drive with SW 72n`' Avenue, and the new access and the modified right-in/right-out access will be designed and constructed to provide visual clearance areas in compliance with this standard. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.2 (Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment) 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-Family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces); 18.360.090.10 (Crime prevention and safety); The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.12 (Landscaping); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 13 OF 19 Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The proposed access dive will provide access to the existing Tri-Met Park & Ride lot. Tri-Met has been involved in the development of the proposed design. Sidewalks and crosswalks have been provided to facilitate pedestrian accessibility and transit use. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard is satisfied. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Chapter 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires an arterial street to have a 104 foot right-of-way (ROW) width and 72-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue, which is classified as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. Southwest 72nd Avenue is currently being realigned in conjunction with the Bridgeport Village project. The ROW dedications and/or transfers required for those improvements will be done with that project. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. The proposal is for a new access into the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site. No blocks are being created with this project. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 14 OF 19 Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. No new streets are being proposed with this application. The proposal is for a new access into the Borders/Bed Bath & Beyond commercial site. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. No new lots are being created with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. The subject parcel has approximately 680 feet of frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The applicant has indicated that sidewalks will be provided along both sides of the realigned 72' Avenue. The applicant has also shown that the new shared access will have sidewalks along both sides of the access drive up to the Tri-Met Park & Ride facility. This meets the criterion. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. A public sever line extension in 72nd is being constructed in conjunction with the Bridgeport Village, 72n Avenue realignment, and Village Inn projects. A service lateral will be provided to serve the Village Inn. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 15 OF 19 There are no upstream drainage areas. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The stormwater runoff from the Village Inn site will be collected, treated and discharged to the public system within the City of Tualatin. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is approximately 685 lineal feet (although, the applicant indicates that approximately 330 feet of the lines along the frontage will be placed underground along with the 72nd Avenue construction); therefore the fee would be $12,425.00. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 16 OF 19 ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: A Technical Memorandum regarding the access adjustment for the retention of the existing central access for Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 was prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated November 21 , 2003. The access spacing standard for an Arterial cannot be met with the retention of the existing central access. The applicant has requested an adjustment to the spacing standard and will provide construction changes necessary to make the central access a right-In/right-out only. The driveway change must be made with the Village Inn construction project or the 72' Avenue construction project for the criterion to be met. Public Water System: No changes to the public water system are proposed. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TfF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. However, traffic impact fees are based on use and square footage. The proposal is for a new access and additional parking stalls. Therefore, no traffic impact fees are required. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Public Works has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: 1 . Place note regarding easements to pot hole existing utilities "Water, etc." to center in the easement. 2. Is the City of Tigard serving the site? If so we need more clarification on needs (fire, irrigation). 3. It is important to have access to these vaults at all times. What about underground power and phone for telemetry? NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 17 OF 19 The City of Tigard Urban Forester has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: 1 . Trees already removed. It is not clear to me which trees are goin to be preserved. Walt Knapp says that 61 trees will be saved, but where are the trees'? The City of Tigard Building Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS City of Tualatin City Administrator has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: I have no negative comments related to the proposed new entrance on SW 72nd to the Village Inn, Park & Ride and Borders. However, one of the ancillary goals of Bridgeport Village has beep to improve traffic flow on SW 72' and Upper Boones Ferry Road. New signage on SW 72n , north of the new entrance should be considered as well as the signage at the entrance itself. In background meetings over the past two years, I have mentioned that the improvements to the SW 72" /Bridgeport Road intersection and the corresponding improvements to the 1-5 interchange (290) need to be promoted by signage for traffic heading south on Upper Boones Ferry Road from the Carman Drive interchange. Minimally, 1-5 route signs need to be placed on Upper Boones Ferry Road at SW 72nd and Durham Road intersections. Unless a driver is familiar with the area, it is exceptionally easy to miss the left turn opportunities to make a more direct access to the 1-5 Interchange as opposed to continuing south on Upper Boones Ferry to Bridgeport Road. Although it might not be the proper reference, it appears that extra signage could be requested based on provisions in Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvements Standards), 18.810.030 Z. Street name signs. Street name signs shall be installed at all street intersections. Stop signs and other signs may be required. Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: The existing service line crosses the lot from SW 70th Avenue right-of-way. Relocate the water meter to SW 69th Avenue right-of-way. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 5, 2004 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 20, 2004 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 18 OF 19 Appeal The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type Ill Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 . may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON MAY 19, 2004. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. C May 5 2004 : PREPARE '• _►A•;*hew S,eieidegger DATE Associate Planner � `z- May 5, 2004 APPROVED BY: Richard H. B wersdorff DATE Planning M ger i:\curpin\mathew\sdr\sdr2003-00017decision.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00017/VILLAGE INN ACCESS&PARKING PAGE 19 OF 19 Rp �� CITY of TIGARD ___. . �( GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM t5 / NsDR200000 e. 11�,� I 3 iii to VAR2003-00109 11 MY ROSEWOOD ST 1 VILLAGE INN ����, PARKING & ACCESS • ■ ,K,,,,,,,E„. • ,....:, ai. LO fe � . N& Ar'R , - � SS� U I s BEiF%VIr D la *P Tigard Area MaP • , i A A,.. / i- 0 Zoo 400 soo Feet Pii e . . Villir L__ .■■_______, 1'=489 feet Ili 4/, ,,,,,, .: ci �, City of Tigard • qQ� SW BRID e '• S 5�vs- . Information on this map is for general location only and swr¢ Y w should be verified with the Development Services Division. ., 13125 Tigard,,O Hall223 ' / Tpard OR 9171 (ww 639-4171 htt ilwww.ci.tigard.or.us\1F7 .Community Development Plot date:Mar 18,2004;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR ACOEM ,IPM s�.rrrrrli1.` _ .. . ItA: -'1i i 1 1 1 1 i r 1 i r .t - �lii,,1 �liri� J ) Iii'', -1� - -J E: ii:i+i-lthN-iiil' """ t 1 i r 1 1 0 i r T i;i BORDERS BOOKS/BED,BATH AND BEYOND(TL 1700) MIRING CENTRAL lililli /l PROPOSED fs D 1 f'=..■I EXISTING LOT AREA = 309,967 sq.ft. 101141/NIiR our 1 ______�' ® EXISTING`�` i.T i 1 T i G LANDSCAPE AREA = 88,539 sQ.ft.(22%-LANDSCAPE COVERAGE) t.I i r i 1 1 C j _ 9;' LANDSCAPE AREAS REMOVED -1,970 sq.R ~ REMAINING LANDSCAPE AREA =66,569 DOURO � -j m.� ... sq.R(21X-LANDSCAPE COVERAGE) RICHT-0FWAW f -_r-- - ■ PROP9RIY 11E I r�, -�-- _y - ` EXISTING BUILDING AREA =t 71,000 0/ � EXISTING NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES =349 PROPOSED Vi .!-.. — _� REMAINING NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS =347-APPROX.5 SPACES 11,000 sq.R PROPERTY UNE ° �-�.� _ / :?' - - t APPROXIMATE AREA TO BE VACATED AND = 3,677 sq.ft. PROPOSED ---_ ,. _ F""''� ADDED TO TAX LOT 1700 SOUTHERN ACCESS - ! 4 r,i THROUGH ODGT. , 4;L..,: .y.. `,-�'-'�i-i i, PA0P0B TY(TN-NEO/ ✓ Ali I=I �TO BE - /i VILLAGE INN •et+ ' - TOTAL AREA WITH TIGARD CITY ) �' ,1"ir 3 z �'.." � LIMITS =2,191 sq.R „r„rJ 44'�' 'P.3i7o " gj'o ^•'i aft 4,sse/ b Off' / mewmr //////// NEW LANDSCAPING WITHIN TIGARD CITY (-74.2T-"::". w...".... ti� \ 0917 V Q�j, f W 1/ / // LIMITS =837 sq.R(38%-UWDSCAPE COVERAGE) 4' 1 ;tii * •.+ `./f P NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES WITHIN TIGARD 5• , �y f ,r. CITY UNITS =6(753 sq.R) �ti, f f h ii(le" 17 -- '....s Rai_ i.„&i PAlsarbi (11 4: _�,�;' �N` r , / F PROPOSED NEW LANDSCAPING 3,298 sq.R N. #. �v R'oosvocc gOi.9 D S* 2 CITY Of TIGARD ITY of TIGARD ? SDR2003-00017/VAR2003-00109 SITE PLAN N VILLAGE INN PARKING AND ACCESS (Map is not to scale) Washington County Attn: Teresa Wilson, Property Manager SDR2003-00017/VAR2003-00109 169 N. First Ave., MS-42 VILLAGE INN PARKING & ACCESS Hillsboro, OR 97124 Washington County EXHIBIT`! Department of Administrative Services Attn: Robert Davis, Assistant County Administrator 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 300 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 Attn: Roger Hansen, Right-of-Way Supervisor 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209 Bridgeport Land, LLC Attn: Selwyn Bingham 3939 NW St. Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 Hamilton Properties, Inc. Attn: Selwyn Bingham 3939 NW St. Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 Bridgeport Village, LLC Attn: Bruce Woods, Opus Northwest, LLC 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1130 Portland, OR 97205 City of Tualatin Planning Department Attn: Will Harper, Associate Planner 18884 SW Martinazzi Avenue Tualatin, OR 97062 City of Durham Roel C. Lundquist, City Administrator 17160 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road PO Box 23483 Durham, OR 97281 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community(Deveropment Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City ofTigardd, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2003-00017/VAR2003-00109 — VILLAGE INN ACCESS & PARKING ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhihit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on May 5,2004, and deposited in the United States Mail on May 5,2004, postage prepaid. sake,- L_ (Person that P epared Notic , S q?E OT O EgON ) County f TigardWashington )ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of ` 1�n(� 2004. OFFICIAL SEAL ::411 SUE ROSS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ^ � COMMISSION NO.375152 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC.1,2007 • NOT ' I :LIC RE ON My C I I ssion Expires: f 3 d 7 EXHIBIT. A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00017 �I CITY OF TIGARD VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING Community Development SjapingA(Better Community 120 DAYS = 7/14/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00017 Development Adjustment (VAR) VAR2003-00109 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Borders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access & Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Borders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. APPLICANT: Bridgeport Village, LLC OWNER: Bridgeport Land, LLC Bruce Wood, Opus Northwest, LLC Attn: Selwyn Bingham 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1130 3939 NW St. Helens Rd. Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97210 OWNER: ODOT, Region 1 Roger Hansen, Right-of-way Supervisor 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209 LOCATION: 16800 SW 72"d Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72"d Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limed to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, CRITERIA: 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 5, 2004 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 20, 2004 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MAY 19, 2004. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheideqqer at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. _- _-7._ \}� -- - • II i-- CITYa,TIGARD ,1 __.. —11+1'. VICINITY MAP \''t, I 1 � f SDR2003-00017 i� _ VAR2003-00109 1 I 1----1,j - -f---1 _; - --- VILLAGE INN ----- —�--- --, PARKING & ACCESS -- PA 111 1 -- --] --.,------ .___Lk I 7::_ii a�) .e.., , '01 I-7d — -- -- 0 2 ___I ____ _____ tl ' 4 SOO 400 WO So/ / i N .r.wrrrCity of f b Tigar d #\/.4 0 _a . AIWA■ -...r / i {wi;{; ;;{ : - t / ----. , ' i ;-:-:.:-: / Q .w. / .,a,.r..a..mra Jl i au......O..sPA.a..a..m .r. ( ': ® ter a SIN 7 + $ a., -- :71-- w ra.,—oo»—I A. , i CITY OF TIGARD I SDR2003-00017/VAR2003-00 1 09 N VILLAGE INN PARKING AND ACCESS (Map Is not to scale) • 2S113AD-01700 2S113DB-01300 EXHIBIT .8 BRIDGEPORT LAND LLC TIC INVESTMENTS LLC& 3939 NW ST HELENS RD MOLA PARTNERS LTD PORTLAND,OR 97210 PO BOX 564 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S113A0-00400 2S113AD-00200 GOLDEN KEY LLC TUALATIN-LAKE OSWEGO LLC BY GEORGE E EDENS 1919 NW 19TH AVE 309 10TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97209 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S113AD-00700 2S113DB-00100 MARTIN LON&JOAN B WASHINGTON COUNTY 6700 SW BRADBURY CT ATTN:TERESA WILSON PROP MGR PORTLAND,OR 97224 169 N FIRST AVE MS-42 HILLSBORO,OR 97124 2S113AC-00103 2 13AC-01200 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES WA NGTON -•UNTY ATTN:N.PIVEN ATTN:T• ' A WILSON PROP MGR 15350 SE SEQUOIA PKWY#300 169 RS E MS-42 PORTLAND,OR 97224 LSBORO,OR '7124 2S113AD-01800 PA• FIC REA ASSOCIATES ATTN: . • EN 15350 E QUOIA PKWY#300 P'•'TLAND, •R 97224 2S113AC-00101 PAS FIC RE ASSOCIATES ATT . -IVEN 153 • S EQUOIA PKWY#300 ••RTLAND, R 97224 2S113AD-01900 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ATTN: N PIVEN 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY STE 300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S113DA-01500 SOUTH LAKE CENTER LLC PO BOX 529 EUGENE,OR 97440 2.113AD-0060 1 SO. H E CENTER LLC PO :% 29 ENE, •- 97440 2S113AD-00500 SWETT CARL R 2853 ROSECLIFF PL LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 23-Feb-04 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING .h, CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve(opment Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of7igarr, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: check Apprt,pnate Box(s)Below) E8 NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2003-00011/VAR2003-00109 - VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) Z City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on March 19,2004, and deposited in the United States Mail on March 19,2004, postage prepaid. /____ ? 21-2g(/ (• - -: at Prepare Ice) STATE OT OEGON ) County of Washington ss. City of Tigard / Subscribed and sworn/affirm6d before me on the 7 day of APIrli , 2004.•j OFFICIAL SEAL 'J J BENGTSON { ;a NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON t( MY COMMISSION COMMISSION P ROES APR 7,2007 ' tfijidiblitAi My Commission Expires: G7�'7 t 7 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: EXHIBIT THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE.IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community'Deve(opmcnt Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: March 19, 2004 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00017 Type II Land Use Application ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2003-00109 FILE NAME: VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Boarders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Boarders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 2S113AD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2. 2004. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to matts(a�ci.tigard.or.us. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 29, 2004. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. . City Staff issues a written decision. . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." • \::, 17 rior),,,,: ,r) Ink YIeINITIf MAP SDR2003 00017 4 �-- VAR2003-00109 i I r -� r- l r=_=_LJ VILLAGE INN r __- --` PARKING & ACCESS VIII/� 1-_ , i 1. iffi MI troFj,... 4_ , ..,,,; ,,, , . ,, .,..., • ,. •,. . . , _____, _ ,. _., , . . ,.. , , , , ..,, ,, , .. _. . \___ ip, _ ,, , __ r 7-- --- 2.!" .1111 IIIII. 4p7 11PW ; D N I Z <i': . ♦ N-- -----7",- 4. ■ .( 0 Ai i / SA _ JL..0 /'`/� 9.11 1/M 2S113AD-01700 2S113DB-01300 EXHIBIT BRIDGEPORT LAND LLC T/C INVESTMENTS LLC& 3939 NW ST HELENS RD MOLA PARTNERS LTD PORTLAND, OR 97210 PO BOX 564 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S113AD-00400 2S113AD-00200 GOLDEN KEY LLC TUALATIN-LAKE OSWEGO LLC BY GEORGE E EDENS 1919 NW 19TH AVE 309 10TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97209 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S113A0-00700 2S113DB-00100 MARTIN LON&JOAN B WASHINGTON COUNTY 6700 SW BRADBURY CT ATTN:TERESA WILSON PROP MGR PORTLAND,OR 97224 169 N FIRST AVE MS-42 HILLSBORO,OR 97124 2S113AC-00103 2 13AC-01200 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES WA NGTON •UNTY ATTN: N. PIVEN ATTN:T' A WILSON PROP MGR 15350 SE SEQUOIA PKWY#300 169 ' RS E MS-42 PORTLAND, OR 97224 LSBORO,OR '7124 2S113AD-01800 PA. FIC REA ASSOCIATES ATTN: EN 1535• E QUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND, OR 97224 2S113AC-00101 PA. FIC RE' Y ASSOCIATES ATT . 'IVEN 153.• S SEQUOIA PKWY#300 •RTLAND, R 97224 2S113AD-01900 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ATTN: N PIVEN 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY STE 300 PORTLAND, OR 97224 2S113DA-01500 SOUTH LAKE CENTER LLC PO BOX 529 EUGENE,OR 97440 2 113AD-0060$ SO. H • E CENTER LLC PO cG 29 •GENE, •' 97440 28113AD-00500 SWETT CARL R 2853 ROSECLIFF PL LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 • Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Crag head 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:lcurpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 23-Feb-04 Washington County Attn: Teresa Wilson, Property Manager SDR2003-00017/VAR2003-00109 169 N. First Ave., MS-42 VILLAGE INN PARKING & ACCESS Hillsboro, OR 97124 Washington County Department of Administrative Services Attn: Robert Davis, Assistant County Administrator 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 300 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 Attn: Roger Hansen, Right-of-Way Supervisor 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209 Bridgeport Land, LLC Attn: Selwyn Bingham 3939 NW St. Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 Hamilton Properties, Inc. Attn: Selwyn Bingham 3939 NW St. Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 Bridgeport Village, LLC Attn: Bruce Woods, Opus Northwest, LLC 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1130 Portland, OR 97205 City of Tualatin Planning Department Attn: Will Harper, Associate Planner 18884 SW Martinazzi Avenue Tualatin, OR 97062 1:5.1.;.1'. " (:) / CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC IN ORMATION SY$'EM 1 / AREA NOTIFIED /( j) (500') 751IMAOOI9O9 f 1 f23113 20G -- —i 111 mawan FOR: SDR2003-000l7 7snu000400 \ �� RE: Updated Mailing Labels �� id, �� � RArDBURY U. mt>.e `�11 7311.1A000508 ■ SITE 73IILUU986 p y Pro ert owner information Is valid for 3 months from 1 the date printed on this map. m SW FINDLAY_ST_ � ISIIIAemioe X i CL 1 ---- \\\\\\ ` � 73112Aeoseoa ,54„ ._ ! Ill i\o,- 7smsAalseo iiiiiii e iir, _ , , fril lgill:1114116 • x ' N 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet 1 1'=390 feet I it„ ��p9 City of Tigard x % /1/1/ / -aV Information on this map is for general location only and p �O `�' should be verified with the Development Services Division. ,,� 1th the SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 8RIDGE? ���a 5�- http:in�ww ld1.or.us Community Development Plot date: Mar 18,2004;C:1magic\MAGIC03.APR • 2S113AD-01700 2S1130B-01300 BRIDGEPORT LAND LLC T/C INVESTMENTS LLC& 3939 NW ST HELENS RD MOLA PARTNERS LTD PORTLAND, OR 97210 PO BOX 564 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S113AD-00400 2S1 13AD-00200 GOLDEN KEY LLC TUALATIN-LAKE OSWEGO LLC BY GEORGE E EDENS 1919 NW 19TH AVE 309 10TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97209 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 2S113AD-00700 2S1 13DB-00100 MARTIN LON&JOAN B WASHINGTON COUNTY 6700 SW BRADBURY CT ATTN:TERESA WILSON PROP MGR PORTLAND, OR 97224 169 N FIRST AVE MS-42 HILLSBORO,OR 97124 2S113AC-00103 2 13AC-01200 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES WA NGTON •UNTY ATTN: N. PIVEN ATTN:T' - A WILSON PROP MGR 15350 SE SEQUOIA PKWY#300 169 ' RS E MS-42 PORTLAND,OR 97224 LSBORO,OR •7124 2S1 13AD-01800 PA. FIC REA ASSOCIATES ATTN: EN 1535• E QUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND, •R 97224 2S113AC-00101 PA*. FIC RE• Y ASSOCIATES ATT . -IVEN 153.. S SEQUOIA PKWY#300 •RTLAND, SR 97224 2S113AD-01900 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ATTN: N PIVEN 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY STE 300 PORTLAND, OR 97224 2S113DA-01500 SOUTH LAKE CENTER LLC PO BOX 529 EUGENE,OR 97440 2 113AD-0060 8 SO6 H • E CENTER LLC PO :• 29 .GENE, • 97440 2S113AD-00500 SWETT CARL R 2853 ROSECLIFF PL LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Crag head 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 23-Feb-04 APPLICANT MATERIALS rrct .nrua 1:1T: • CITY C. TIGARD PLANNING .VISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189 503.639.41711503.684.7297 'Y OF TIGARD OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION File # 53 aoo9- a 0O l 7 Other Case # PRE aoo 3 -aoD9 (Z d,(1,0 3 — °4101 Date . i I iR5/D 3 By •ear Receipt # a 003 -5Ro 7 1 City X Urb Date Complete UM/Oil TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR AdjustmentNariance(I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑Zoic Change (III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Plannec Development (III) ❑Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review (I, II or III) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) ►:I Site Development Review (II) ❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ SuDdivision (II or III) -COCATTO1T WH-ERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY-WILL OCCUR(dd'ess if available] 16800 SW 72"0 Avenue and ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72"0 Avenue and Bridgeport Rd. I AX AF�TAX-LOT NOS. 2S113AD-01700 To I AC SI 1 E SIZE - — —. ZONING CLASSIFICATION Approximately 6.6 acres General Commercial -A—MATT' Opus Northwest MAILING ADDRESSR i I YSTA 1 1000 SW Broadway#1130, Portland, OR 97205 -PHONE NU. FAX NO. 503-916-8963 503-916-8964 -FRTMARYCON TACT PERSON -PHONE-NO. - -J.- Bruce Wood 503-916-8963 PRtTERT-O WEWDEEDTiOCDERlA11a-1e i hs'if more Thar!one) Selwyn Bingham f ODOT Region 1, Attn: Roger Hansen MAILIF a 1DDRES 1C1TYTSTATJZIPv 3939 NW St. Helens, Portland, OR 97210 I 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209 -PHONE NO FAX NU- ___ - Bingham: 503-224-2678 I ODOT 503-731-8430 When he owner and the applicant are different people, the appl cant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession w th written authorizaton from the owner or an agent of the owner. TheLoWners must sign his application in the s� p rovided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this app ication. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) Type II Site Development Review approval for both new development and a major modification of existing development for a small amount of on-site parking (all or a portion of 6 parking spaces)and 837 square feet of landscaping for a proposed new Village Inn restaurant, which is located in the City of Tualatin; and new access drive serving the existing retail on Tax Lot - 13AD-01700 (Borders Bookstore), the Tri-Met Park & Ride lot and the proposed new restaurant. This is a Major ification to the access to Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 pursuant to Section 18.360.050. An adjustment to the Access and Egress standards to retain the existing central access to the retail uses on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 (Borders Bookstore) as a right-in/right-out limited access. - APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. THE APPLICANT SHALL CER X THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true: and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EA CH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. SEE A- T1"ift-cff�� Owner's Signature Date wner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date 441., 110 �plicantJAgen Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date CITY OF TIGARD 11/25/2003 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 3:18:37PM ihoo4 Tigard,Oregon 9 72 23 . ■ 1 11. (50 3)63 9-4 17 1 • Receipt #: 27200300000000005167 Date: 11/25/2003 • Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid SDR2003-00017 [LANDUS] Site Development Rev 100-0000-438000 3,423.00 VAR2003-00109 [LANDUS] ADMIN VARIANCE 100-0000-438000 238.50 Line Item Total: $3,661.50 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check Approval No. How Received Amount Pat.. Check OPUS NW LLC CAC 204105 In Person 3,661.50 Payment Total: $3,661.50 THE FACE OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS A SCREENED BACKGROUND AND COLORED INK. O O Opus Northwest L.L.C. n'(• OP Seattle • Denver • Minneapolis Easl Grand Forks,MN 56721 (DATE) (NUMBER) Portland • Kansas City • St.Louis 24dbur Banking 1-800-673-3555 10350 Bren Road West 75-1592/912 11/20/03 204105 Minnetonka,MN 55343 (AMOUNT) ********$3 , 661 . 50** PAY Three Thousand Six Hundred Sixty One Dollars & 50/100 CITY OF TIGARD TO THE ORDER OF V v Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt A. OPUS OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. OR CCB#105336 ��^�,� 1000 SW Broadway, Suite#1130 ` O Portland, OR 97205 c Phone(503)916-8963 Fax: (503)916-8964 IVAR 9_t1 2004 TRANSMITTAL Date: March 22, 2004 NG To: City of Tigard Village Inn Access Modifications 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard SDR2003-00017NAR2003-00109 Tigard, OR 97223 Attention: Matt Scheidegger We are sending: [X] Attached [ ] Under Separate Cover [X ] Hand Delivered [ ] Sent U.S. Mail. (Courier, Fed X,UPS, U.S. Mail) The Following: [ ] Copy of Letter [ ] Prints [X] Plans [ ] Samples [ ] Specifications [ ] Shop Drawings [ ] Change Order [ ] Sepias [ ] QUANTITY DATE DESCRIPTION 2 3-2-04 Additional copies of Submittal Books These are transmitted: _ For Approval _ Approved _ For Your Information X For Your Use _ Approved As Noted _ For Bids Due X As Requested _ Not Approved _ For Review and Comment Notes: Please contact me if you have any questions. File - City of Tigard Correspondence OPUS NORT EST, L.L.C. Mike Nichols opus OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. R GE�v5) E OR CCB#105336 1000 SW Broadway,Suite#1130 r Q 1 13'3 Portland, OR 97205 Phone(503)916-8963 Fax:(503)916-8964 QED►GroEEa,NG,POcoWi TRANSMITTAL 1t. °' Date: December 1, 2003 To: City of Tigard Access Modification, Village Inn Parking 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Site Development Review Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR Attention: Matt Scheidegger We are sending: [X] Attached [ ] Under Separate Cover [ X] Hand Delivered [ ] Sent U.S. Mail. (Courier,Fed X,UPS,U.S.Mail) The Following: [ ] Copy of Letter [ ] Prints [X] Plans [ ] Samples [ ] Specifications [ ] Shop Drawings [ ] Change Order [ ] Sepias [ ] QUANTITY DATE DESCRIPTION 2 12-1-03 Revised Property Owner Authorizations, 2 each for ODOT and Bridgeport Land LLC These are transmitted: For Approval _ Approved _ For Your Information X For Your Use _ Approved As Noted _ For Bids Due _ As Requested _ Not Approved — For Review and Comment Notes: Please replace the property owner authorizations in our SDR application with these. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. File - City of Tigard OPUS NOR WEST, L.L.Z. f ' Mike Nichols A ACCESS MODIFICATION / VILLAGE INN PARKING • ii\ -_____ -4‘ ,t.. 1 ,.... , iii ..... A .. li_ I __. ......... - RT , al ; . , ,:.- - ....i = .. . I . z_,..„ _ ....... _,-...„.„,..,_ ..._ , ,zur.,.. .....„....;:......_ -.6--- - 1 , _ APPLICATION FOR : SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUBMITTED TO : CITY OF TIGARD SUBMITTED BY: BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE LLC NOVEMBER 2 5 , 2003 REVISED MARCH 2,2004 0 0 pu s 8 Access Modification and Village Inn Parking Site Development Review APPLICATION Submitted to: City of Tigard Submitted by: Bridgeport Village LLC 01. OPUS November 25, 2003 REVISED MARCH 2,2004 Access Modification and Village Inn Site Development Review Application TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION A. Application Forms B. Property Owner Authorizations C. Pre-Application Notes D. Project Team E. Summary of Proposal II. CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS A. Conformance with the Tigard Development Code,Chapter 18.360(Site Development Review) B. Conformance with the Tigard Development Code,Chapter 18.370 (Variances/Adjustments) C. Conformance with Tigard Development Code,Chapter 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Studies) D. Conformance with the Tigard Development Code,Chapter 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) E. Conformance with Tigard Development Code,Chapter 18.705 (Access/Egress/ Circulation) F. Conformance with the Tigard Development Code,Chapter 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening Standards) G. Conformance with the Tigard Development Code,Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) H. Conformance with Tigard Development Code,Chapter 18.765 (Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) I. Conformance with the Tigard Development Code,Chapter 18.790(Tree Removal) City of Tigard Access Modification i Village Inn Application for Site Development Review November 25,2003 Revised March 2,2004 J. Conformance with the Tigard Development Code,Chapter 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas) K. Conformance with Tigard Development Code,Chapter 18.810(Street and Utility Improvement Standards) III. EXHIBITS [Reduced 11"x 17"included in binders] Exhibit 1: General Project Information Sheet 1A. Cover Sheet and Vicinity Map Sheet 1B. Aerial Photograph Sheet 1C. Right of Way Exhibit 2: Site Development Plan Exhibit 3: Grading and Tree Removal Plans Sheet 3A. Grading/Erosion Control Plan Sheet 3B. Tree Removal/Preservation and Mitigation Plan Memo 3C. Memorandum from Arborist Exhibit 4: Public Facilities Plan Sheet 4A. Existing Conditions Sheet 4B. Proposed Utilities and Storm Drainage Plan Sheet 4C. Public Improvement/Proposed Streets Plan Sheet 4D. DEA Drawing of Entrance to Park and Ride Sheet 4E. RCl/DEA Drawing of SW 72nd Avenue Improvements Sheet 4F. ODOT Drawing#RD705 Concrete Island"porkchop" Sheet 4G. RCl/DEA Details for Water Quality and Detention Exhibit 5: Landscape Plan Sheet 5A. Landscape Plan Sheet 5B. Landscape Plan—Detail Sheet 5C. Street Landscaping Exhibit 6: Traffic Impact Analysis Exhibit 7: Drainage Report Exhibit 8: Service Provider Letters Exhibit 9: Impact Study Exhibit 10: Neighborhood Meeting Documentation City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review November 25,2003 Revised March 2,2004 I. INTRODUCTION A. CITY OF TIGARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORMS The required City of Tigard Development Application Forms are provided on the following pages. In addition to these forms, the application provides findings of fact, drawings and exhibits which fulfill the applicable criteria of the Tigard Development Code. The applicable criteria were identified by City of Tigard staff during a pre-application conference on November 4, 2003. The contents of this application have been compiled by the project team, which consists of experts in the fields of land use and transportation planning, civil engineering, site planning and architecture (for Team Members see Section C). City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-1 November 25,2003 B. Property Owner Authorizations iir �.rr cuu� iu.a� .rua�c'+tor� Dll`IUr1W'I LL I l'Alat l STATEMENT OF PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION Bridgeport Land LLC Selwyn Bingham the undersigned the property owner, do hereby consent to allow Opus Northwest LLC to include the property described below and shown on the attached map in the Village Inn Site Development,Review application to be submitted for cwrishit(ation to the City of Tigard. By signing below,I hereby consent to this land use application being submitted for the property listed below. Site Address: 16800 SW 72tid Avenue Tax Roll Description: Tax Lot 2S113AD017SSee map below) Owner's Name: (print) So/we, 5iragh40v-z, Owner's Signature; 24140rai Date: /f r z�• e)3 -.41. aim Amyl — founiir Willi nil 13AD017•• t� , I1, , 2S113AC01200 noi rr 111P1- 11►i4 2S 113D1300100 Prod=►t Site ip# tAd AakAal • - & Si Nov 24 u 1 u: e o a Post-it'c x Note 7671 a1ej,/-2g-41;a8es■ Z I To A.✓�� From Co/Dept. Co. Q Phone it Phone 1 3_7 3/-1Y541 Fax l Fax STATEMENT OF PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION Oregon Department of Transportation 1, the undersigned,am an authorized signatory for the-property owner,the Oregon Department of Transportation. i do hereby consent to allow Opus Northwest LLC to include the property described below and shown on the attached map in the Village Inn Site Development Review application to be submitted for consideration to the City of Tigard. By signing below,I hereby consent on behalf of Oregon Department of Transportation to this land use application being submitted for the property listed below. General Location: Land within the right-of-way of SW 72'1 Avenue and immediately northeast of the corner of SW 72"s Avenue and SW Bridgeport Road Description: See map below Owner's Signature: Date: ,pinul,+ r L1!I,i 13M017,0 Mr SIM rem. 11 2S 113AC01200 In MOP iii �- �, INE 2S113DB00100 PrO): � 4. Abin ii In&9411616,a, Ai NEVA •••••0•-• Lf- f -.J.1.. I..:2 V Oct 24 03 01 : 10p Ant EatonLAssociates 503-227- 9 p. 3 ... ...,..--...,.0......„.... -- .54,.....,Km .,- • • I :1‘k1.11 'i it e f . • Ix ...o.t.t ; 1 .1 ■ , ... ..-- • .. . •• •..• • • ... i I 1 1 - I I • ..--. i fo I ;■■• 4 p i A.....{if• '..... --,A.0 0 i ti. I Ii I, I -I i I ,-....:II I I - .!• 1 4'-1 it -.1... . .. N......„. *-:! 1 m ' 17_ c.sis •.t:c' Sr -..›...--:- Z:1 . ' ---F L ' .' 9ifill II I :-..,-...:4,--- Ii......i, - • -,1 s.-- •1/4 ; i iip i c......) • \ -- Nt, - : 1 , ..,, 1 I . I t .. f ■ I .".. ... 1. 1 1 : i i 1 * I • \N 1.),,s- , .0 ... e . to< . ‘1,04.../- - • , , / c v , ..... .., t, ,, ,L. • ‘ ...07 0 • • ,•• :/, / , • 0 ./-- \i. ,,,, f, 4,, , , e.TA. 4'ISA 43.. •. .: i ' i P Ks.:TA T :r ..----- "ss ' .i. .• \ .---.—„. "if -, •..07\•-• , Ne / • 1.4 P , ,.;„,%, •... 'al 16' S -/ - Zo, •. •'i 'Z',. , , /• , Y. •'... ',/lr..1. /- 1/./.. .: kle. •\;•>14.,,,‘ '...0 ' -).• ',quo .......- 9...... ....— .... At I 1 ...../ 0.' ) .... •"'"- .1 ' IV / /. . / .' . 1- i/ • r)11\ I e/. ,, 1'■: )- . 1%. a 1 , .,.. ...... )t tt f k \ Iv•;,.•-• . . • .4.// el 't 4i16 .ii: " s•-• . I / . - % 1 ff. -Vf. •. t A 1 f • .,'. ' " .. ' fi I :! • 1 ! It r 11 • !. : C. • „.; .* , ' ' ' iii 1 ' Jr .0 II • e 1 1 ? I' .-C C.31 1S1 I \oG 2 . ck0- .- __..----— 1,7--.-.-.* : - ••- - - -.-... 1 1 • ‘ c 44 9'1051' tb0 14 - ...._ .--(14" ,.,• _*IN ', - u-.0,k.‘1`1..- ...- ./... •■••- ....-.•0.• . \ ' .....„. ............ ........ 1 . ' ....■ . .....-'St 4 C. ,...tt.:......i. t••• t i d o*w o o*4 C C I I S T O SO ltous 000KsToptE,t 044ET P R I Ran i.1.l.A.J3i sow TUAtARN,OREGON 1 — --- , — —-- -— K Icez4::::.•4.4111117/117,2rea STATEMENT OF PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION Bridgeport Land LLC Selwyn Bingham I, the undersigned the property owner, do hereby consent to allow Opus Northwest LLC to include the property described below and shown on the attached map in the Village Inn Architectural Review application to be submitted for consideration to the City of Tualatin. By signing below, I hereby consent to this land use application being submitted for the property listed below. Site Address: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue Tax Roll Description: Tax Lot 2S113AD017 (See map below) Owner's Name: (print) Afro ---------- ------------ - Owner's Signature: Date: /3/41/%7 niii: ill all_ � I , 13AD017•0 ' NMI I"," 2S 113AC01200 1 o 11.1,, , 2S 113DB00100 , Prod=•k • et1 �i Nov 24 03 10: 25a Rn6r Eaton&Rssociates 503-2 -3679 p. 1 ANGELO <4> EAToN & Associate s FaX 620 SW Main Suite 201 Portland OR 97205 503-224-6974 503-227-3679-FAX To: Roger Hansen From: Frank Angelo Finn: ODOT—Region 1 Date: November 24,2003 Fax: 503-731-8458 RE: Bridgeport Village—Village Inn Application Phone: Pages 3 cc. ❑ Urgent x For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑Please Recycle Roger—I really hate to bother you again on this project, but we have to submit a Development Review Application in the city of Tigard for the Village Inn because portions of the new access will be in Tigard. The building is in Tualatin, but Tigard is making us go through their review process because the access to the site is altered. Again, because ODOT is a property owner, I will need your signature on the attached form for our submittal to Tigard. Thanks for your cooperation and patience in this matter. Any questions, please call me at 503-227- 3664. Thanks, Frank Nov 24 03 10: 25a Ang Eaton&Associates 503- '-3679 p. 2 STATEMENT OF PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION • Oregon Department of Transportation I, the undersigned, am an authorized signatory for the property owner,the Oregon Department of Transportation. t do hereby consent to allow Opus Northwest LLC to include the property described below and shown on the attached map in the Village Inn Site Development Review application to be submitted for consideration to the City of Tigard. By signing below, I hereby consent on behalf of Oregon Department of Transportation to this land use application being submitted for the property listed below. General Location: Land within the right-of-way of SW 72"d Avenue and immediately northeast of the corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bridgeport Road Description: See map below d Owner's Signature: �� ,Q� � r�i�Jw ! �/1✓ c.5—dirS2i/154 Date: 11111111 11111, - 11111111111. ���'■ l�� ■, . 13AD017'0 ir Ili 1 1 2S113AC01200 EIN 111 tr ' ■ tal ■ 2S 113DB00100 prod- .y ♦ fro41, Nov 24 03 10: 25a Ant ' Eaton&Associates 503-' -/-3679 P• 3 , . .. • Obt'-' 24 03 0110p Angelo Eatontfissociates 503-227-3679 r- 3 sw,.....Vrhup.0......A.......w .....cansis■-■---... ......,.- ___..._............._....— ,--..-,.....-.,. ...... ...,........,,_—_...nac--,- i .j.11. .1 • i .1 1 I I EAT , i . 2, , ,_ •• _ . .."1,,. 4%,f 1 I 1"-50 i ...- I • ' , - If,i , qt . t 11 , : 1 . . , I I° 1 : . ' . 4+ :,. .. . . •'1 I 114 1 \ :',...'',,. . '•,'•41..• . 'a • t . • • I i ti: ,,, • ' •- •,,: )1I 1'111..1_1 I • . ---- 1 I ;1:fil r,::', s ' __FL , 54'4 1 1!iii 1 .1 i (7.- r;t1i9 I 4110 1 I ' \ ' ''''. ..'' - ( '?",‘■ ''' I I ,..p; , ; 1 ! AO' ; i cs.-1) .s• •k \ . . k-\, \• k I . - . \-, .. . i I 4 1 1 i ... S i ! ' I 1 ; I ..+- ..- \ I i i I I ; ,.. ,.. r v i • i ' \ , i 41/'1 ti/ / c -q, •, 41 '''. „.. V It it i 'i I \ \\,/, . I I . C I if 7 f 4 e ' t" "j'A .4" i t■fr RI _ . s n ._ , ' sA' '44; .• ,-....• / //), . -...., . .. ,• .19, , / 1 ' N ,./. //',/ 4410, i• , le: I X ) / .....- ' 1..... ......"*Nt . , • .. is, I 4 \ 4 "4% 4 1 irk Oti s 1, it, i i A, , . 1 ./ 1 m.." ,, .„, „• t/ // V ,•-• I t 4' 1 / ' I• ../ , i„)- -.* • i • ! . -, tk- / . • ./ ' . . i- \ ‘ i f I ■■. %, A a ',..:■••• • .. /. ;/ .4, S.., ,„ i . . . • • r , s•ti I i , • V //f ,: A5• ,.. ,,,f ,....„„.,......„,\40 I e -r , 5.14 iy Tao . , \PI.. ---*::::.::-....._:.":„..,.:.:......i.................__ , o , . ... _ _ ., . , .-.. . . . ,_.) rem AVENUE ACCESS TO eonoEris NOOKSTOPE r I Rt-liET PARK 4 RIDIE r Inu.acs Imps TUALATIN,OREGON -- - - _ STATEMENT OF PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION Washington County I, the undersigned, am an authorized signatory for the property owner, Washington County. I do hereby consent to allow Opus Northwest LLC to include the property described below and shown on the attached map in the Village Inn Architectural Review application to be submitted for consideration to the City of Tualatin. By signing below, I hereby consent on behalf of Washington County to this land use application being submitted for the property listed below. General Location: The southeast •.rtion of the 28.6 acre Count -owned real ro ert ,own as the Durham uarr located immediate) northwest of the intersection of SW Brid_e•ort Road and SW 72nd Avenue. (See attached ma.) Description: Tax lot 2113DBODI00(See ma below) Owner's Name: (print) /e,Bteot T Uc-v(,r Owner's Signature: /6(e-c.,..../A- /42.6,--ej ---- -- ---- — ------ --- ---- ---- Date: lC) e-3. --- Ay 000000000 imp ■411 env mom NNINIIr as Ilan Nu ______ ti 13AD017•. nip MB MI1"111 2S 113AC01200 frIV ill ■N � et% r 2S113DB00100 pro;: , d Vii ` . i PrAm A _ sTAT�ME`vr of 1' the undersign �j'ego pRppERTY��'1V r��v teet �d?at11 do au nel�art�erit a f rr ERA TK�k1�Ar ``�ollrtec he`�rOpe SPo17atial��i2eursl�rat 8�snortetfon 101V p ain Rei'ie dee�rihPd � hereb °'Y for th Trams aYsi wappl e below Y Consent eAtopej7 AorF-atepn t°�`�h'gla,ld w I he e��ub���°�the al�w�A No` �e QrgRoi Cence e applicati �t ov be °os,de n�intheejti tLC to of a/ °Cation: Jni f Qregon the Cit age jbu sub Lid with;., for the property l.t f jn edra d'enB6t-o , steel befaw SW to/Y not7heast waY of'sW 7 hd Bnd oft 2 Description: Report Road he cop, or SW ve1j ue and 72 Avenu Se C and C) er s e ma, below S1Piature: AM Date:`` �----, mar► G - aft.Z ill* 1 � ♦ t�► 25 /3,0c0.1200 r 017 �r� ,o iv,♦ o tipargliWir 1,,�. I 71 De0°'a0 ,, . . . kij-,11,•011r tirolltiollot I r iiiliposf.„.,,Note _."_-,_t__:_:- co✓p er ,p_ - ?671 iih_D a 4`�o from 2 03 . iliaWlesisllIllillps • Asa--' ' �� ���� . - ;r- .-...v.,tp,....54":' :. ..r.),,:f !" I 101, 1 \lc i..0#, ..•t.:t...4-1 ok"%r" .:.2.:. .."2 0 0 ft, I .... i. ...., ....AI t. 1 ei,1 lir 1 gl.,40T4.:!? . ,.... c. c,ii,s 7 C.C. i , i 1 I I / ..: i'''.'? )1k,ilit \ 14. IP \ <\ -_, 1: I 1 I) 1 it, K(EPIC „.,ck CI!:''/ e. i ,I) .0, "vi"'"‘k r A'' ..)‹l,' • 1.' . . --- ---' --- - - ��r ' i . < 0)1i 0_4' •,,-•" V/ / . ~ / i • � �___ ' ---__'—_'-_ ~_�- / 72NO AVENUE. '—~--~—~~.~~ u°"'"°�s,^nv • |m' °�".o�w� � ' _, • . NW I/4 SE I/4 SECTION 13 T2S R I W W.M. 2S 113DB SEE AIAP WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SEE MAP I !..4.- 23 I RAC SCALE I'.IOC, n, ....25 1 RAC 111 .. mat \ �� ' war. \ iiiJ'. F ...._ .._ is°uf"`k• .-r.+.o�e..+m.. r — 100 \ 7 1.J A\L A 7 ; N \ /,... 1 \ \ . ,.+ / 83 / X '\ \ \ ea ' r/ \ . / / \ 8S Y 1 \ \ \ / / 1 \ \ \ / \ / / w Z \ / / 6 ROO Q \ \ \\ 23w.76 / r /� / 78 LS 1 RCA \ \ \ •�- / 23E11304 1100 , 87 \ \ / wK \ X \ 77 ACC\ \ ,ALV*� �+, \4 • 4-i, z \ ?" • 4. CV FOR ASSES9AETFT 44 701 - �` PURPOSES ONLY. �sp ,..` .0•11. - S� H 0 / X 00 NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER 115E ��' \ tit .4. 76 88 \ e 500 ; / .so ' A WOO 2.2AAC / / .AV ,r h �. 75 ...4% r 5 0 3� 2 t .r,a y so) \ �a. 1F t■ ..,1A. 4 Z W J.nit ( 0 O t \ \� 74 \ /. r wO � � p \' \ \\ t \ \ \ l44 Q° 0 CV a ur a _et'. Lo.,. \`,..� \ \ \ .i ? Q) z .iS , cc W 0 A,, \ \ \ 2 / C7 O \ \ \\ ce y LI-- w0 1 N. \ 59 y\ A 0 >1.- tL 44 SS 113C0 \ SEE MAP \ \ / / O st V V" > / TUALATIN / A 2S 1 I3DB SW 1/4 NE 1/4 SECTION 13 T2S R 1 W W.M. 2S 1 I3AC WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE r•loci aQ MAP to 1 1343 IA , is 1 1314 N"- 21 •• . 'I loz { I I ° 01 I Z I.00 4C .....c II — ... - -—• =a I { I I I I a. �I 24 1 23 1 26 I 27 I 29 1 30 1 31 32. C I O U I N C 1 L I P' IVJ. EIW 1 23 �J I I I 1 : I I 1 1 l'E _ _J.._ r - - •1 - - 1 — _ 1 - - 3 1 _ _ 1 _ _ 1 _ _ _L i i t 42 i so I I • I I o 1 a MAP I war 3 I A l C U E S gti4M 1 1 , >a 1 MAO "" 43 t 41 I 40 I 39 38 I 37 I 3s 3a 1 •rroN um( r I I toe 1 23 174 I ~'' ROAD r 44 I 1 ill o, 1 7 ++ �. 1 .. 1 ,,I I r l r 1 r T I+ r 1 • 11122 MAP MOO a Imo 1 I I.Me sil p I I I I t I I I 2 3 k 4 k 5 i 6 7 8 9 tO I � 2387 Co u N i c 1 IL I v 1 �� �v I � . .... ,.. ... _ - 1 — - 1 - - 1 - - 1 - - 1 ' SW FINDLAY ROMP]--..o - •..... .•— ..•r —. moo .00 1 I I I Xi MAC p I l A C 1 R E I S IN O. 1 I 1 to 20 — /9— ► 18 17 16 4 15 I 14 13 12 1 i a I { I I I I 11111 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 _ �".' ,• •O.�•I 1 .�_ - M lirI_ti • —DURHAM It s 1lOS TIGARD 2S I I3AC • WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT&TAXATION OCT 1 0 2003 FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY-DO NOT RELY ON FOR OTHER USE SE 1/4 NE I/4 SECTION 13 T2S R I W W.M. 2S I I3AD WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE 1%100' r SEE MAP I 23 1 MIA IWO •.446■4 . Y!K • — 9 0 ... _, $,.r— t —a— T —.r T — T —.r— T T• �/ �ROSE WOODa . I— — I — — I .-- I O I I I d /� zoo I '&V.r t I 1 ya I I — — / M I I >- 10 .I 9 1 0C� 8 I 7 1 6 I 5 4 �/ 3 >; 2 1 1 H iL 1 r ' ,/ I Mao I I I 1 NO0 I I I 14 n -� F -"".t•+ -.r— + — — -' — — 'I- — — + r - .. .. + - ur --e.- I I I I I C7 h 400 WAD '3 ROOM 0 SEE MAP Y ZS i MAC E z I I I I I 2 a • I + I I 11 12 I 13 I 14 I 15 B • Y 7ft.....,.. 18 ; 19 20 U 11 c.N / to um.", n. �. gI 23 74 1 (, 1 0 ► ..........IMS•0... g 1 I I Al I z :"."1 4i 4 ."F -"m. .i �- i -r- 1 - -I- .L '" rc 1 ..-.7.• MEIN —r —.,r— -r —,,.= SNL BRADBURY COUR -r -.r T — t = T R ...s I 1 I 1 1 :r ' 3 to f I I I 23+76/? 1 Q M Ft--'- 80 29 1 28 I 27 "II ,- s" 5 n/ 23 22C• ICI 21 1 I I I I P 11 r Q 100 I'll i 1I 1I 1I + ,,...E I ,.K .1-4 I"K + —•a— + —!-- + --r T 1 r' !_ ♦1 1 M • 1 I I ; i--a- V -1-I I II I I 1 I 1 1 134 1 6 qp . J Q 1 X31 32 i 33 35 36 371'1 38 _(_ 39 ;_.51-1 —I 1 I Ir' v rNi.7i • I I I I I ; I i I ro ASSESSMENT y yam 301 PURPOSES ONLY. ? 1 I 1 .!/4• DO NOT RELY ON 1 Ed L. N .+s• I I r I KR ANY aTN[R w[. w Ir rLi1 eat Y .1 1 1 r- o .r LV.- • 4 • "...04.••••1161101111%. — — — —• t 4 SE[ MAP I r TUALATIN '170A I 2S I I3AD C. Pre-Application Notes CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES c�c-r1t7 ority�i�a 'Rt Sf+vpinj 4(Better Community (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) NON-RESIDENTIAL acre Mc DE //-e, '/-en3 Siff B AR //Is/Kg* APPLICANT: � AGENT: 7‘1'Ae /MMcL/s Phone: ( ) Phone: (563) ' / - PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: i L g S _ TAX MAPS)/LOT #(S): as/i314T -(3/71?c7 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: C5 DK) f e 7 �rA 7 e�c� PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: � ti,� v rte" ` y!" COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: '' �-C ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C_ G CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM(C.I.T.)AREA: ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. 1-2V l MINIMUM LOT SIZE: O sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: Ty ft. Max. building height: 4_5" ft. Setbacks: Front 0 ft. Side - ft. Rear c ft. Corner CJ ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: gS % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /L5 -%. .. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted_ NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section „K._ NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. Pi—IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050] As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.7651 Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: 3 C . Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: [xj WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 D STREETS: feet from the centerline of D LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. D FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ] SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.B.) BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: D A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; D All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and D The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. I I BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: [ LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.7051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. I I RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. ,V1 PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Jit.i.0 � ,;, (4 ✓ 3 -o -S Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. (L LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. n SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL • DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. I I STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CLEARWATER SERVICES(CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) - LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA 4 CORRIDOR PER SIDE5 • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% • 10 to <50 acres 15 feet 1 >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 1 10 to <50 acres 30 feet >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine6 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential AppficationwPlanning Division Section • • Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards_ Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIL3ENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. Kt SIGHS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.C.) A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: �) Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; �1 Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. kMITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.EJ REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: • A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Y If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: 0 The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. I I ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS a'1\ 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) x 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) - _ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 3j+st_ 18.350(Planned Development) 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) 18.780(Signs) 1.(, J•` 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 7 .. s. 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) ± 18.790(Tree Removal) ,,t, _ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) - 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas)• � •„it. 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) _ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 6 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impad Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) X 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) _ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) - 18.420(Land Partitions) 1 8.742(Home Occupation Permits) - 18.430(Subdivisions) X 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) - 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobl Home Regulations) ?L 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 'x 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) - 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: S ar c , r4 [ ' .GP•Za old °moo (-4(4,S .(1 ar /Kct`i � 4 5'� t rn�e,s f � s.7/® 6,c--a o 71 Lite; C//17 os/B • I� as 3 O. a i . - LL% . - r ��i - s ., _ • .' - -s 74 - - =- • ,may PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard �e�, ' !� I ��� . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process" fs availa from tFie P anning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staffprelative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: CITY OF 1- IG G - STV:SON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 E-MAIL (staffs first name)@ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(au OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.ci.tigard.or.us H:Ipatty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 3-Oct-02 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section r . PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q Ilan,°Com t Shaping)1 Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map[sl: 25113011 Tax LOt[sl: 01700 Use Type: The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 EglneedntiI mrtmentSeetlen Other: 1 I street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: [ 1 feet of pavement concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb [ storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees [ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. U Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement I I concrete curb [ I storm sewers and other underground utilities 1 J -foot concrete sidewalk street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW 72' Avenue. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. The design shall meet CWS standards. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. I I Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. The proposed entrance into the Village Inn site does not meet City of Tigard. Section 18.705.030 of the Development Code addresses Access Management. The Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP) classifies SW 72nd Avenue as an Arterial. The minimum driveway spacing along an arterial is 600 feet. The applicant can apply for a variance to this standard. All public utilities located in the proposed abandoned portion of 72nd Avenue shall be relocated to the proposed ROW or easements shall be dedicated. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering nepartmeni Section , impact upon the City's trans) ation system. The applicant shall t Squired to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposea development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay the TIF. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section . Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: 401■11p,,A1 flu k • ' • 0 ENGINEERI G DEPARTMENT STAFF DATE Phone: (5031639-4171 Fax (5031624-0752 document3 Revised: September 2, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section . , . A PRE-APPLICATION . i CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hail Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: Opus Nor thw st Address: 1000 SW Broadway Phone: a3-916-8963 Case No.: {Ta--e.,.. 3'OTOCtir, City: o r t l a n d #1130 Zip: 97205 Receipt No.: Z3-0-7 - y if . Application Accept 9d By: JC -� Contact Person: Mike Nichols Phone: 50R-91 .6-8963 Date: yo�*0,• Property Owner/Deed Holder(s):_oDOT (ser4 bclaw) / DATE OF PRE-APP.: a //// 0 3 . Selwyn gingha m TIME OF PRE-APP.:, j_0: O t3 / J Address: -R A 3Q nrw ct _ Helens RP�one: 503—?74=2678 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: City: Portland Zip: 9 7 2] 0 _ Rev.1118/2002 i;\curpin\masters\rev sed\Pre-AopRegi:estdoc Property Address/Location(s): ODOT rt . of way NE r -- of the SW 7 2nd Ave . and Bridgeport REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS 'Note: applications will not be accepted R o a. ' 11 - - ' • • : ? c e .W 7 2nd Av `, without the required submittal ciements) Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 2 S 1 1 3 A D 017 0 0 I Zoning: G _ ' ❑ Pre-Application Conf. Request Form 9: 1 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Site Size: Approx. 6 . 6 Ac . -- ❑ Brief Description of the Proposal and any site-specific questions/issues that PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be ❑ Site Plan. The site plan must show the submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a Site Plan lots site pl building show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a drawn to scale. Also, show the location pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to of the subject property in relation to the prepare for the meeting. nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject property and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are ❑ The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of ❑ Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11i00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for al PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM MONOPOLE project, the applicant must 8:00-4:001MONDAY•FRIDAY. attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of mailing, that' IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE the collocation protocol was completed PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Community Development Code). ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE 1 Filing Fee $205.nn GROUP. ! ODOT - Region 1 , Attn : Roger Hansen 123 NW Flanders , Portland , OR 97209 (503 ) 731-8430 CITY OF TIGARD 10/29/2003 A 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 9:48:55AM Tigard,Oregon 97223 .11.' (503) 63 9-4 17 1 Receipt #: 27200300000000004749 - Date: 10/29/2003 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid PRE2003-00096 [LANDUS]PreApp Conf 100-0000-438000 205.00 Line Item Total: $205.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check Approval No. How Received Amount Pp'- Check OPUS NORWEST LLC KW 5115 In Person 205.00 Payment Total: $205.00 .' 5115 G OPU * 1, P E ', J L- P - 3` a 24-22/123D 3268 woo SW 'S • ` s w k , ' PORTLAND,OR ;5*54:,...44.*;.‘,;,‘4 y '.} � f° r„ \012—t�b3 fi . H i Bate Pall tothe 0,_). - . N Order of � r4 O 4,1:-&-0--A. 04.4.N010,P Dollars el gi:` 17 bank. ugbenk.com x asz t. �, FbasurSnrkv a curd 0 Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) December 2003 S M T W I F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Tuesday, December 30, 2003 8:00 8:30 9:00 Pre -app Grant& Kim Yozamp 481-0240 MLP 12500 SW Karen 9:30 10:00 Pre-app appt Bob Law 608-5150 10895 SW 95th 10:30 11:00 Pre-app appt 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 2:57PM Thursday,December 18,2003 .. , ANGELO • EATON & Associate s M E M O R A N D U M TO: Matt Scheidegger, City of Tigard FROM: Cathy Corliss, AICP, Angelo Eaton & Associates Hermanus Steyn, Kittelson & Associates DATE: October 28, 2003 CC: Mike Nichols, Opus Northwest FILE #: 061-001 RE: Pre-Application Request Project Description PROJECT HISTORY Washington County owns the twenty-nine acre Durham Quarry site at the northwest corner of SW Bridgeport Road and SW Lower Boones Ferry Road(See Figure 1,Vicinity Map). Of the twenty-nine acres, approximately twenty-one acres are in the City of Tualatin and eight are in the City of Tigard. In 1991,the County declared the Durham Quarry surplus property and began working with the cities of Tualatin,Tigard and Durham to plan for the site's redevelopment as a mixed-use development. Since that time,a number of actions have been taken to facilitate the proposed Bridgeport Village development: • Tualatin adopted Chapter 57(Mixed Use Commercial Overlay District); • Tigard amended its Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance to allow comparable mixed-use development; • An Intergovernmental Agreement(IGA) has been signed between Tualatin and Tigard to allow Tualatin to review and decide all land use applications and building permit applications for the entire site;and • The County selected Opus Northwest to develop the site. • On July 16,2003,the Tualatin Architectural Review Board approved the Bridgeport Village application to create a mixed-use development on the twenty-nine acre Durham Quarry site at the northwest corner of SW Bridgeport Road and SW Lower Boones Ferry Road. Concurrently,the associated Public Facilities Review was approved by City of Tualatin staff. • The Tualatin City Council upheld both decisions at an appeal hearing on September 8,2003. • 620 SW Main, Suite, 201 Portland, Oregon 97205 • phone 503-224-6974 • fax 503-227-3679 • X:■Projects!061001 Bridgeport Village\Word\Villagelnn\Tigard Preapp description_v2.doc •• Tigard Pre Application Request- continued • Page 2 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION The proposed development of Bridgeport Village is dependent on a number of transportation facility improvements,including: • Realignment of SW 72nd Avenue/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road; • Widening of SW Bridgeport Road; • Widening of SW Lower Boones Ferry Road; and • Widening along the Interstate 5/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road interchange ramps. The existing Village Inn site is located in the southwest corner of the existing SW Bridgeport Road/SW 72nd Avenue/Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection with accesses off SW Bridgeport Road and Lower Boones Ferry Road. The proposed road improvements in the vicinity of the Interstate 5/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road interchange requires the realignment of the SW 72nd Avenue/Lower Boones Ferry Road route increasing the intersection spacing between the southbound ramp terminal intersection and SW 72nd Avenue. This realignment goes through the existing Village Inn site. It was agreed that Village Inn restaurant would be relocated as part of this road improvements. The City of Tualatin included the following condition in the Public Facilities Findings&Recommended Decision document released on July 22,2003: "Imprvwnazts on SW 72nd Aternre will include a median at the existing unsignalizal access location searing Borders Bookstore to limit tumirig rnomme its to right-in and right-out(Condition PFR-4)." In addition,the new signalized intersection(site across)on 72nd Ague will protide access east of 72nd Avenue to the relocated Village Inn restaurant,the existing North Park & Ride(PAR)and the Borders Bookstore. The project development team met with various parties and/or jurisdictions to reach an agreement regarding the future access to the Borders Bookstore property,the North Tri-Met Park&Ride lot,and the relocated Village Inn restaurant. The new signalized access will lead to an internal intersection that will provide individual access to the Borders Bookstore parking lot,the north Tri-Met Park&Ride lot,and the Village Inn parking lot. To maintain efficient and safe traffic flow through this intersection,it has been proposed that the intersection be stop controlled on the three parking lot access legs and uncontrolled on the leg coming off of SW 72nd Avenue. Based on discussions with Washington County and ODOT staff,they concur with the proposed geometry and proposed form of intersection control. PROJECT PROPOSAL The applicant,Opus Northwest,is responsible for the relocation of the existing Village Inn restaurant from its present location to the proposed site. The new Village Inn site will be located in the northeast corner of the new SW Bridgeport Road/SW 72nd Avenue/Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection,just to the east of the Bridgeport Village Development. The majority of the site is within the City of Tualatin and remainder is within the City of Tigard's General Commercial District. The portion of the site,which is within the City of Tigard was not included in the IGA and therefore is subject to separate review by the City of Tigard. The proposed development within the City of Tigard includes the following: • A small amount of on-site parking and landscaping for proposed new Village Inn restaurant which is located in the City of Tualatin;and • New access for existing retail(Borders Bookstore),Tri-Met Park&Ride and proposed new restaurant. • Tigard Pre Application Request- continued • Page 3 The realignment of SW 72nd Avenue/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road and the provision of access to the Tri- Met Park&Ride facility and existing retail(Borders Bookstore,etc.)has been the subject of considerable participation and negotiation on behalf of all of the affected parties. Access to this area will be through a shared signalized intersection off SW 72nd Avenue. As shown in Figure 2,the proposed site plan provides operational and safe on-site circulation and parking complying with the jurisdictional design standards. PROPOSED USES The proposed development includes the following uses: • Parking and landscaping(for proposed new restaurant) • New access for existing retail and park-and-ride and proposed new restaurant TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION Figure 3 show the proposed grading plan for the new Village Inn site. The proposed profiles and super- elevation rates of the realigned SW 72nd Avenue and SW Lower Boones Ferry Road result in a consistent grade across the site. The relatively flat site provides easy pedestrian and vehicular circulation, and minimizes the retaining walls required for this development. A small retaining wall is proposed at the south end of the site along SW Lower Boones Ferry Road. • Tigard Pre Application request- continued • Page 4 FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP NM ■ womb mil/ ■■ _ IIR 5.! _ Ikea.J E . 13AD017.0 r ir 1 pi p 11mu 2S113AC01200 C , C gla II III I � I "WM 2S113DB00100 Proj= •...,1■ell 40#11, Al 'I, . ��i irgg a A Relocation of Village Inn Restaurant October 2003 . l I 11 11 i - N 1 I 11 \\1*1 t ei ► ' I I I 1"=50' lii I; I I 1 II 1 11 I t: - I(U Il [' I II ; �I i DRAFT ,., ( . -I I 1 sei I II I I 1 I 11 1 I7I ..... , / 1�\ / I X 1 1 / \\ \ I/ / ' I / I \ / 1 / // / I 1 I "li • \ I o \\\\ , \\\ ,\/ /,'7\,'''st- \'‘. . , \ \ / / [: , ' 71// 4 ; / / / , i \ . / / .,\' 4 ‘C:-) • \ '/ N ,st..' : III' • / : 41 / / . / , ' ' / /li a ' , --) ) ' ' /. i ESII' Nk / / r / -.*IN\-‘ N.\\N:\.\\*..;\ .—__\ y / \C . // N ' . / N \ x/ / - i / . / -- — - / �O i// " /// // / /// e //40/ ' ,, . : /l ,/ //// / / / ii . , i !, ` . l / fr/ ' • / ,r��V�^ � I crx_ IZ i7 ; - - — - -L„,...,..72 ' ( Y , ► ter. _ _ - - - _ - - O v r \ G , R- _ " I A =� J TP 1 0: .._,... 0` �...,-- _____- 72ND AVENUE ACCESS TO BORDERS BOOKSTORE/TRI-MET PARK & RIDE/VILLAGE INN L. AND PROPOSED SITE PLAN 0 Ki TUA LATIN, OREGON KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,IN .G FIGURE 2 TRANSPORTATION PUNNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERIN D. VILLAGE INN PROJECT TEAM PROPERTY OWNERS Bridgeport Land LLC 3939 NW St.Helens Road Portland,OR 97210 503-224-2676 Phone 503-224-2679 Fax Contact: Selwyn Bingham Oregon Department of Transportation,Region 1 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209 503-731-8430 Phone 503-731-8458 Fax Contact: Roger Hansen, Region 1 Right-of-Way Supervisor APPLICANT/DEVELOPER Bridgeport Village,LLC 1000 Southwest Broadway, Suite 1130 Portland,OR 97205 503-916-8963 Phone 503-916-8964 Fax Contact: Bruce Wood,Opus Northwest,LLC Mike Nichols,Opus Northwest,LLC ARCHITECT Architects Van Lom+Company,AIA,PC 34 NW First, Suite 309 Portland,Oregon 97209 503-226-0590 Phone 503-273-8649 Fax Contact: Joseph Van Lom,AIA CIVIL ENGINEERING LDC Design Group,Inc. 3300 N.W.211th Terrace Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 503-858-4242 Phone 503-645-5500 Fax Contact: Frederick G.Holz,P.E. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-4 November 25,2003 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Christopher Freshley,Landscape Architect 1020 SW Taylor,#355 Portland, OR 97205 503 222 9881 Phone 503.224 7069 Fax Contact: Christopher Freshley TRAFFIC ENGINEERS Kittelson &Associates,Inc. 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Portland,OR 97205 503-228-5230 Phone 503-273-8169 Fax Contact: Mark Vandehey ARBORIST Walter H.Knapp Silviculture&Urban Forestry 7615 SW Dunsmuir Beaverton,OR 97007 503-646-4349 Phone 503-265-8117 Fax Contact: Walter Knapp LAND USE PLANNING Angelo Eaton & Associates 620 SW Main, Suite 201 Portland,OR 97205 503-227-3673 503-227-3679 Fax Contact: Cathy Corliss City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-5 November 25,2003 E. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Project History Washington County owns the twenty-nine acre Durham Quarry site at the northwest corner of SW Bridgeport Road and SW Lower Boones Ferry Road(See Exhibit 1,Vicinity Map). Of the twenty-nine acres, approximately twenty-one acres are in the City of Tualatin and eight are in the City of Tigard. In 1991,the County declared the Durham Quarry surplus property and began working with the cities of Tualatin, Tigard and Durham to plan for the site's redevelopment as a mixed-use development. Since that time, a number of actions have been taken to facilitate the proposed Bridgeport Village development: • Tualatin adopted Chapter 57(Mixed Use Commercial Overlay District); • Tigard amended its Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance to allow comparable mixed-use development; • An Intergovernmental Agreement(IGA)has been signed between Tualatin and Tigard to allow Tualatin to review and decide all land use applications and building permit applications for the entire site; and • The County selected Opus Northwest to develop the site. • On July 16,2003,the Tualatin Architectural Review Board approved the Bridgeport Village application to create a mixed-use development on the twenty-nine acre Durham Quarry site at the northwest corner of SW Bridgeport Road and SW Lower Boones Ferry Road. Concurrently,the associated Public Facilities Review was approved by City of Tualatin staff. • The Tualatin City Council upheld both decisions at an appeal hearing on September 8,2003. Project Background and Description The proposed development of Bridgeport Village is dependent on a number of transportation facility improvements, including: • Realignment of SW 72'd Avenue/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road; • Widening of SW Bridgeport Road; • Widening of SW Lower Boones Ferry Road; and • Widening along the Interstate 5/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road interchange ramps. The existing Village Inn site is located in the southwest corner of the existing SW Bridgeport Road/SW 72nd Avenue/Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection with accesses off SW Bridgeport Road and Lower Boones Ferry Road. The proposed road improvements in the vicinity of the Interstate 5/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road interchange requires the realignment of the SW 72nd Avenue/Lower Boones Ferry Road route increasing the intersection spacing between the southbound ramp terminal intersection and SW 72nd Avenue. This realignment goes through the existing Village Inn site. It was agreed that Village Inn restaurant would be relocated as part of this road improvements. The City of Tualatin included the following condition in the Public Facilities Findings&Recommended Decision document released on July 22,2003: City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-6 November 25,2003 "Improvements on SW 72"d Avenue will include a median at the existing unsignalized access location serving Borders Bookstore to limit turning movements to right-in and right-out(Condition PFR-4)." In addition, the new signalized intersection (site access)on 72nd Avenue will provide access east of 72nd Avenue to the relocated Village Inn restaurant, the existing North Park&Ride (P&R) and the Borders Bookstore. The project development team met with various parties and/or jurisdictions to reach an agreement regarding the future access to the Borders Bookstore property(Tax Lot 2S 113AD-01700),the North Tri- Met Park&Ride lot, and the relocated Village Inn restaurant. The new signalized access drive will lead to an internal intersection that will provide individual access to Tax Lot 2S 113AD-01700(the Borders Bookstore parking lot),the north Tri-Met Park&Ride lot, and the Village Inn parking lot. To maintain efficient and safe traffic flow through this intersection, it has been proposed that the intersection be stop controlled on the three parking lot access legs and uncontrolled on the leg coming off of SW 72nd Avenue. Based on discussions with Washington County and ODOT staff,they concur with the proposed geometry and proposed form of intersection control. Project Proposal The applicant,Opus Northwest, is responsible for the relocation of the existing Village Inn restaurant from its present location to the proposed site. The new Village Inn site will be located in the northeast corner of the new SW Bridgeport Road/SW 72nd Avenue/Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection,just to the east of the Bridgeport Village Development. The realignment of SW 72nd Avenue/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road and the provision of access to the Tri-Met Park&Ride facility and Tax Lot 2S 113AD-01700 (Borders Bookstore)has been the subject of considerable participation and negotiation on behalf of all of the affected parties. Access to this area will be through a shared signalized intersection off SW 72nd Avenue. The proposed Village Inn restaurant development includes a 5,794-square feet building with 80 surfaced on-site parking spaces. The building and most of the parking spaces will be located in the City of Tualatin,while only a small amount of on-site parking(all or a portion of 6 spaces)and landscaping for the proposed new Village Inn restaurant will be in the City of Tigard. The portion of the site which is within the City of Tigard's General Commercial District was not included in the IGA; and,therefore is subject to separate review by the City of Tigard. In order to develop the proposed improvements within the City of Tigard,the applicant is requesting the following approvals from the City of Tigard: Type II Site Development Review approval for both new development and a major modification of existing development: • A small amount of on-site parking(all or a portion of 6 parking spaces)and 837 square feet of landscaping for a proposed new Village Inn restaurant,which is located in the City of Tualatin;and • New access drive serving the existing retail on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700(Borders Bookstore), the Tri-Met Park&Ride lot and the proposed new restaurant. This is a Major Modification to the access to Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 pursuant to Section 18.360.050; Approval for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards for: • An adjustment to the access spacing standards to retain the existing central access to the retail uses on Tax Lot 2S 113AD-01700(Borders Bookstore)as a right-in/right-out limited access. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-7 November 25,2003 A, II. CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS A. CONFORMANCE WITH THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE,CHAPTER 18.360 (SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW) 18.360.010 Purpose A. Promote general welfare. The purpose and intent of site development review is to promote the general welfare by directing attention to site planning, and giving regard to the natural environment and the elements of creative design to assist in conserving and enhancing the appearance of the City. B. General purposes. It is in the public interest and necessary for the promotion of the health, safety and welfare, convenience,comfort and prosperity of the citizens of the City of Tigard: 1. To implement the City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan and other approval standards in this title; 2. To preserve and enhance the natural beauties of the land and of the man-made environment, and enjoyment thereof; 3. To maintain and improve the qualities of and relationships between individual buildings, structures and the physical developments which best contribute to the amenities and attractiveness of an area or neighborhood; 4. To protect and ensure the adequacy and usefulness of public and private developments as they relate to each other and to the neighborhood or area;and 5. To ensure that each individual development provides for a quality environment for the citizens utilizing that development as well as the community as a whole. C. Environmental enhancement. To prevent the erosion of natural beauty, the lessening of environmental amenities,the dissipation of both usefulness and function,and to encourage additional landscaping, it is necessary: 1. To stimulate harmonious design for individual buildings, groups of buildings and structures, and other physical developments; 2. To encourage the innovative use of materials, methods and techniques and flexibility in building placement; and 3. To integrate the function, appearance and location of buildings and improvements so as to best achieve a balance between private prerogatives and preferences, and the public interest and welfare. Response: The proposed development,which is subject to Site Development Review,includes a small amount of on-site parking (all or a portion of 6 spaces) and 837 square feet of landscaping for proposed new Village Inn restaurant which is located in the City of Tualatin; and a new access drive serving the existing retail (Borders Bookstore), Tri-Met Park & Ride and proposed new restaurant. In addition, the applicant is seeking an adjustment to the access spacing standards to retain the existing central access to the existing retail on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 (Borders Bookstore) as a right-in/right-out limited access. The proposed development supports the existing commercial development and park-and-ride facility and enables the development of proposed new uses in the area and transportation system improvements, thereby achieving the purpose of this chapter. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-8 November 25,2003 18.360.020 Applicability of Provisions A. Applicability and exemptions. Site development review shall be applicable to all new developments and major modification of existing developments,as provided in Section 18.360.050..... Response: The proposal includes both new development and a major modification of existing development pursuant to Section 18.360.050 and is therefore subject to site development review. 18.360.030 Approval Process A. New developments and major modifications. Site development review for a new development or major modification of an approved plan or existing development, as defined in Section 18.360.030A, shall be processed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.360.090. .... Response: The proposed development is subject to site development review and will be processed by means of a Type II procedure. The applicant recognizes that site development review approval by the Director is effective for a period of 1-1/2 years from the date of approval and that the site development review approval will lapse if substantial construction of the approved plan has not begun within a one-and-one-half years period; or construction on the site is a departure from the approved plan. 18.360.040 Bonding and Assurances A. Performance bonds for public improvements. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall require a bond in an amount not greater than 100% or other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and B. Release of performance bonds. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. C. Completion of landscape installation. Landscaping shall be installed prior to issuance of occupancy permits, unless security equal to the cost of the landscaping as determined by the Director is filed with the City Recorder assuring such installation within six months after occupancy: 1. Security may consist of a faithful performance bond payable to the City,cash, certified check or such other assurance of completion approved by the City Attorney; and 2. If the installation of the landscaping is not completed within the six-month period, the security may be used by the City to complete the installation. D. Business tax filing. The applicant shall ensure that all occupants of the completed project, whether permanent or temporary, shall apply for and receive a City of Tigard business tax prior to initiating business. Response: The applicant understands that on all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall require a bond in an amount not greater than 100% or other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan and that the bond will be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. The applicant also understands that required landscaping shall be installed prior to issuance of occupancy permits, unless security equal to the cost of the landscaping as determined by the Director is filed with the City Recorder assuring such installation within six months after occupancy. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-9 November 25,2003 18.360.050 Major Modification(s)to Approved Plans or Existing Development A. Determination request. An applicant may request approval of a modification to an approved plan or existing development by: 1. Providing the Director with three copies of the proposed modified site development plan; and 2. A narrative which indicates the rationale for the proposed modification addressing the changes listed in subsection B below. B. Evaluation criteria. The Director shall determine that a major modification(s) will result if one or more of the following changes are proposed. There will be: ... ... 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; ... C. When the determination is made. Upon determining that the proposed modification to the site development plan is a major modification, the applicant shall submit a new application in accordance with Sections 18.360.030 and 18.360.070 for site development review prior to any issuance of building permits. Response: The proposed development would result in a change in the type and location of accessways where off-site traffic would be affected; therefore it is within the description of a major modification. 18.360.060 Minor Modification(s)to Approved Plans or Existing Development A. Minor modification defined. Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in Section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification... Response: The proposed development is within the description of a major modification; therefore this section is not applicable. 18.360.070 Submission Requirements A. General submission requirements. The applicant shall submit an application containing all of the general information required for a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040. B. Additional information. In addition to the submission requirements required in Chapter 18.390, Decision-Making Procedures, an application for the conceptual development plan must include the following additional information in graphic, tabular and/or narrative form. The Director shall provide a list of the specific information to be included in each of the following: 1. An existing site conditions analysis; 2. A site plan; 3. A grading plan; 4. A landscape plan; 5. Architectural elevations of all structures; and 6. A copy of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants. Response: The items listed above are included as exhibits within this application as follows: Sheet 4A. Existing Conditions Map Sheet 2A. Site Development Plan Sheet 3A. Grading/Erosion Control Plan Sheet 5A. Landscape Plan No structures are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this project; therefore architectural elevations are not included. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-10 November 25,2003 18.360.080 Exceptions to Standards A. Exceptions to setback requirements. B. Exceptions to parking requirements. C. Exceptions for private or shared outdoor area. D. Exceptions to landscaping requirements. Response: The applicant is not requesting an exception to the setback, parking, outdoor area or landscaping requirements as part of this application; therefore this section is not applicable. 18.360.090 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions,or denying an application: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; Response: As addressed in this application, the proposed development will comply with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810,Street and Utility Standards. 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; (2) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (3) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. Response: There are no changes proposed to the existing structures and there no new buildings proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application; however, trees have been preserved to the extent possible and the requirement of Chapter 18.790 have been addressed. 3. Exterior elevations: a. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple-family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following: (1) Recesses, e.g., decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet; (2) Extensions, e.g., decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet,a maximum length of an overhang shall be 25 feet; and (3) Offsets or breaks in roof elevations of three or more feet in height. Response: There are no changes proposed to the existing structures and there are no new buildings proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application; therefore these criteria are not applicable. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-11 November 25,2003 4. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example, between single-family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: (1) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution,filter dust,or to provide a visual barrier; (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; (3) The direction(s)from which buffering is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering; and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: (1) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile;and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. Response: The surrounding land uses are compatible with the proposed development; therefore buffering and screening between uses is not applicable. 5. Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses: a. Structures which include residential dwelling units shall provide private outdoor areas for each ground floor unit which is screened from view by adjoining units as provided in Subsection 6.a below; b. The buildings shall be oriented in a manner which protects private spaces on adjoining properties from view and noise; c. On-site uses which create noise, light, or glare shall be buffered from adjoining residential uses;and d. Buffers shall be placed on the site as necessary to mitigate noise, light or glare from off-site sources. Response: There are no multi-family or group living uses proposed as part of this application; therefore,these criteria are not applicable. 6. Private outdoor area: multi-family use: a. Private open space such as a patio or balcony shall be provided and shall be designed for the exclusive use of individual units and shall be at least 48 square feet in size with a minimum width dimension of four feet; and (1) Balconies used for entrances or exits shall not be considered as open space except where such exits or entrances are for the sole use of the unit; and (2) Required open space may include roofed or enclosed structures such as a recreation center or covered picnic area. b. Wherever possible,private outdoor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun; and City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-12 November 25,2003 c. Private outdoor spaces shall be screened or designed to provide privacy for the users of the space. Response: There are no multi-family or group living uses proposed as part of this application; therefore,these criteria are not applicable. 7. Shared outdoor recreation areas: multi-family use: a. In addition to the requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, usable outdoor recreation space shall be provided in residential developments for the shared or common use of all the residents in the following amounts: (1) Studio up to and including two-bedroom units,200 square feet per unit; and (2) Three or more bedroom units, 300 square feet per unit. b. The required recreation space may be provided as follows: (1) It may be all outdoor space;or (2) It may be part outdoor space and part indoor space; for example, an outdoor tennis court,and indoor recreation room; or (3) It may be all public or common space;or (4) It may be part common space and part private; for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room and balconies on each unit;and (5) Where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. c. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable to promote crime prevention and safety; Response: There are no multi-family or group living uses proposed as part of this application; therefore,these criteria are not applicable. 8. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. Response: This subject site is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain; therefore, these criteria are not applicable. 9. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space,to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility;and b. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: (1) A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A change in elevation or grade; (4) A change in the texture of the path material; (5) Sign; or (6) Landscaping. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-13 November 25,2003 Response: There are no changes proposed to the existing structures and there are no new buildings proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. As shown on the Landscape Plan [Exhibit 5], perimeter landscaping between the Village Inn parking area and the accessway will clearly demarcate the public access way from the semi-public parking area associated with the new Village Inn restaurant. In addition, signage will be provided to direct users to the park-and-ride facility,Village Inn restaurant and existing retail stores as appropriate. 10. Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Response: There are no changes proposed to the existing structures. There are no windows, laundry and services areas,or mailboxes associated with the proposed new development within the City of Tigard; however, light fixtures will be provided along the access drive and within the Village Inn parking lot in accordance with this section. 11. Public transit: a. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route; b. The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: (1) The location of other transit facilities in the area;and (2) The size and type of the proposal. c. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: (1) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses;and (3) Connecting paths to the shelters. Response: The proposed access drive will provide access to the existing Tri-Met park-and-ride lot. Tri-Met has been involved in the development of the proposed design and sidewalks and crosswalks have been provided to facilitate pedestrian accessibility and transit use. 12. Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745; b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-14 November 25,2003 Response: As shown on the Site Development Plan [Exhibit 21,38% of the gross development area of the Village Inn site within the City of Tigard has been landscaped. There is approximately 68,539 square feet of existing landscaping on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 (Borders Bookstore); this represents approximately 22% of the gross site area. The proposed development would reduce this amount by 1,970 square feet, resulting in an overall landscape coverage of 21%; thus,the site will remain in compliance with this standard. 13. Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Response: The site drainage has been designed in accordance with the adopted 1981 master drainage plan. 14. Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and Response: The proposed improvements have been designed in compliance with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act. The proposed circulation system seeks to avoid barriers to disabled individuals. Curb ramps will be provided wherever a walkway crosses a curb. 15. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370.; (Ord. 02-33) Response: As addressed by this application, the applicant is seeking a modification to the access spacing standards to retain the existing central access to the existing development located at 16800 SW 72w' Avenue (Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 - Borders Bookstore) as a right-in/right-out access. All other provisions and regulations of the underlying zone have been applied. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-15 November 25,2003 5, B. CONFORMANCE WITH THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.370 (VARIANCES/ADJUSTMENTS) 18.370.010 Variances Response: The applicant is not seeking a variance to any of the applicable standards; therefore this section is not applicable 18.370.020 Adjustments A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish two classes of special variances: 1. "Development adjustments" which allow modest variation from required development standards within proscribed limits. Because such adjustments are granted using "clear and objective standards," these can be granted by means of a Type I procedure, as opposed to the more stringent standards of approval and procedure for variances. 2. "Special adjustments" which are variances from development standards which have their own approval criteria as opposed to the standard approval criteria for variances contained in Section 18.370.020.C. Response: The applicant is seeking a "special adjustment" from the access and egress standards,Chapter 18.705. B. Development adjustments. Response: The applicant is not seeking any adjustments from the development standards; therefore,this section is not applicable. C. Special adjustments. 1. Adjustments to development standards within subdivisions(Chapter 18.430). 2. Adjustment to minimum residential density requirements(Chapter 18.510). 3. For adjustments to density requirements in Washington Square Regional Center, the standards of Section 18.630.020.E apply. 4. For Modifications to dimensional and minimum density requirements for developments within the Washington Square Regional Center that include or abut designated Water Resource overlay areas,the standards of Section 18.630.020.F apply. Response: The applicant is not seeking any adjustments from the standards listed in 1 — 4, above; therefore,these sections are not applicable. 5. Adjustment to access and egress standards(Chapter 18.705). a. In all zoning districts where access and egress drives cannot be readily designed to conform to Code standards within a particular parcel, access with an adjoining property shall be considered. If access in conjunction with another parcel cannot reasonably be achieved, the Director may grant an adjustment to the access requirements of Chapter 18.705 through a Type II procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria contained in Subsection 2b below. b. The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirements contained in Chapter 18.705,based on the following criteria: (1) It is not possible to share access; (2) There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-16 November 25,2003 street; (3) The access separation requirements cannot be met; (4) The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access; (5) The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; and (6) The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met. Response: The applicant is seeking an adjustment to the access and egress standards, Chapter 18.705. As described in the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Bridgeport Village Development [Executive Summary included in Exhibit 6], the placement of the proposed site accesses was identified in collaboration with Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Washington County, City of Tualatin, and City of Tigard staff as part of the overall transportation improvement program for the site to ensure optimal traffic operations along SW Bridgeport Road and SW 72nd Avenue while still providing access to the existing businesses along the south side of SW Bridgeport Road and along the east side of SW 72"Avenue. As stated in the City of Tualatin Conditions of Approval for the Bridgeport Village Development,the existing driveway serving the Bed, Bath, & Beyond/Borders Bookstore shopping center will be modified to a right-in/right-out driveway, while the new shared access would accommodate the left-turn movements prohibited at the existing driveway. As described in the memorandum entitled "Access Adjustment for the Retention of the Existing Central Access for Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 [included in Exhibit 6], the City of Tigard's access spacing criteria were addressed and it was concluded that the access would provide adequate circulation and operation of traffic both along SW 72°d Avenue and in the Borders Bookstore parking area. 6. Adjustments to landscaping requirements(Chapter 18.745). 7. Adjustments to parking standards(Chapter 18.765). 8. Adjustments to sign code(Chapter 18.780). 9. Adjustments to setbacks to reduce tree removal(Chapter 18.790). 10. Adjustments to wireless communication facilities(Chapter 18.798). 11. Adjustments for street improvement requirements(Chapter 18.810). Response: The applicant is not seeking any adjustments from the standards listed in items 6— 11,above; therefore,these sections are not applicable. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-17 November 25,2003 C. CONFORMANCE WITH TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.390 (DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES/IMPACT STUDIES) 18.390.010 Purpose A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish a series of standard decision-making procedures that will enable the City, the applicant, and all interested parties to reasonably review applications and participate in the local decision-making process in a timely and effective way. Each permit or action set forth in Chapters 18.320- 18.385 has been assigned a specific procedure type. Response: The applicant is seeking approval of a Type H Site Development Review application for a Major Modification pursuant to Section 18.360.090 and concurrent approval of a Type II Access/Egress Adjustment pursuant to Section 18.370.020 C3b. 18.390.020 Description of Decision-Making Procedures A. General. All development permit applications shall be decided by using one of the following procedure types. The procedure type assigned to each action governs the decision-making process for that permit, except to the extent otherwise required by applicable state or federal law. The Director shall be responsible for assigning specific procedure types to individual permit or action requests, as requested. Special alternative decision-making procedures have been developed by the City in accordance with existing state law,and are codified in Section 18.390.070. B. Types defined. There are four types of decision-making procedures,as follows: 1. Type I Procedure...; 2. Type II Procedure. Type II procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria. Type II actions are decided by the Director with public notice and an opportunity for a hearing. If any party with standing appeals a Director's Type II decision, the appeal of such decision will be heard by the Hearings Officer; 3. Type III Procedure...; 4. Type IV Procedure.... C. Summary of permits by decision-making procedure type. Table 18.390.1 summarizes the various land use permits by the type of decision-making procedure. Response: The applicant is seeking approval of a Type II Site Development Review application for a Major Modification pursuant to Section 18.360.090 and concurrent approval of a Type H Access/Egress Adjustment pursuant to Section 18.370.020 C3b. 18.390.030 Type I Procedure Response: This section is not applicable. 18.390.040 Type II Procedure A. Preapplication conference. A preapplication conference is required for Type H actions. Preapplication conference requirements and procedures are set forth in section 18.390.080C. Response: A preapplication conference was held on November 4,2003. B. Application requirements. 1. Application Forms. Type H applications shall be made on forms provided by the Director as provided by Section 18.390.080 El; 2. Submittal Information. The application shall: b. Include the information requested on the application form; City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review ii-18 November 25,2003 c. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; d. Be accompanied by the required fee; e. Include two sets of pre-stamped and pre-addressed envelopes for all property owners of record as specified in Section 18.390.040C. The records of the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation are the official records for determining ownership. The applicant shall demonstrate that the most current assessment records have been used to produce the notice list; f. Include an impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests,the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Response: All of the submittal requirements listed above have been included as part of this application. C. Notice of pending Type II Administrative Decision. Response: The applicant understands that prior to making a Type H Administrative Decision, the Director shall provide notice to all owners of record within 500 feet of the subject site; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or who is otherwise entitled to such notice in accordance with this section and has provided a set of stamped and addressed envelopes for this purpose. D. Administrative decision requirements. The Director's Decision shall address all of the relevant approval criteria. Based upon the criteria and the facts contained within the record, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny the requested permit or action. Response: The applicant understands that the Director's Decision will address all of the relevant approval criteria and will be based upon the criteria and the facts contained within the record. E. Notice of decision. Response: The applicant understands that within five days after signing the decision,a Notice of Decision shall be sent by mail to the applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site which is the subject of the application; all owners of record of property as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll, located within 500 feet of the site; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or who is otherwise entitled to such notice in accordance with this section and has provided a set of stamped and addressed envelopes for this purpose. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-19 November 25,2003 F. Final decision and effective date. A Type II Administrative Decision is final for purposes of appeal when notice of the decision is mailed. A Type lI Administrative Decision becomes effective on the day after the appeal period expires, unless an appeal is filed. If an appeal is filed and dismissed after the appeal period has expired, the Type II Administrative Decision becomes effective on dismissal of the appeal. Response: The applicant understands that a Type II Administrative Decision is final for purposes of appeal when notice of the decision is mailed and becomes effective on the day after the appeal period expires, unless an appeal is filed. G. Appeal. Response: The applicant understands that a Type H administrative decision may be appealed by a party with standing; a Notice of Appeal must be filed with the Director within ten business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed; and Type III notice and hearing procedures shall be used for all Type II Administrative Appeals. H. Final decision and effective date. Response: The applicant understands that the decision of the Hearings Officer with regard to any appeal of a Type H Administrative Decision is the final decision of the City.The decision of the Hearings Officer is final for purposes of appeal on the day the decision is mailed. The decision is effective on the day after the appeal period expires, unless an appeal is filed. If an appeal is filed, the decision is effective on the day after the appeal is resolved; 18.390.050 Type III Procedure Response: This section is not applicable. 18.390.060 Type N Procedure Response: This section is not applicable. 18.390.070 Special Procedures Response: This section is not applicable. 18.390.080 General Provisions Response: The applicant understands that the "Effective date" means the date on which a particular action or decision may be undertaken or otherwise implemented. For decisions which are subject to review or appeal by any city council, board, or officer, the effective date will normally be the day after the appeal period expires. If an appeal is dismissed after the appeal period has expired, the decision that was the subject of the appeal becomes effective at the moment of dismissal. Final decisions of the City (those that are not subject to any further appeal or review within the City) are normally effective when they become final. In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by this chapter,the day of the act or event from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review Ii-20 November 25,2003 included, unless it is a Saturday or legal holiday,including Sunday,in which event,the period runs until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday or legal holiday. The applicant understands that the Director shall have the initial authority to determine the proper decision-making type relevant to the permit or actions requested. The decision of the Director may be appealed only as a relevant issue through the process assigned by the Director to the underlying permits or actions. If the Director's determination regarding the proper decision- making type is not raised as an issue within the process assigned by the Director to the permit or action requested, the Director's decision shall be final concerning the applicable decision-making type. The applicant understands that whenever an applicant requests more than one approval and more than one approval authority is required to decide the applications, the proceedings shall be consolidated so that one approval authority shall decide all applications in one proceeding. Where there is a consolidation of proceedings, the notice shall identify each action to be taken and separate actions shall be taken on each application. The applicant understands that when an application is received by the City, the Director shall immediately determine whether essential items are present. When the application is accepted, the Director shall review the application for completeness. If the application for a permit, limited land use, or zone change is incomplete, the Director shall notify the applicant of exactly what information is missing within 30 days of receipt of the application and allow the applicant to submit the missing information. The application shall be deemed complete upon the receipt by the Director of the missing information. If the applicant refuses to submit the missing information,the application shall be deemed to be complete on the 31st day after the Director first reviewed the application. If the application was complete when first submitted or the applicant submits the requested additional information within 180 days of the date the application was first submitted approval or denial of the application, shall be based upon the standards and criteria that were applicable at the time the application was first submitted. Once an application is deemed complete all documents and other evidence relied upon by the applicant, but submitted after the application has been deemed complete, shall be submitted to the Director at least seven days before the notice of action or hearing is mailed. Documents or other evidence submitted after that date shall be received by Director, but may be too late to be considered by the Director in the staff report or Director's decision, as the case may be. When documents or other evidence are submitted by the applicant during the review period, but after the application is deemed complete, the assigned review body may determine whether or not the new documents or other evidence submitted by the applicant,significantly changes the application; The applicant further understands that an application which has been denied or an application which was denied and which on appeal or review has not been reversed by a higher authority may not be resubmitted for the same or a substantially similar proposal or for the same or substantially similar action for a period of at least 12 months from the date the final City action is made denying the application unless there is substantial change in the facts or a change in City policy which would change the outcome. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-21 November 25,2003 �;. D. CONFORMANCE WITH THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.520 (COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS) 18.520.010 Purpose A. Provide range of commercial services for City residents. One of the major purposes of the regulations governing development in commercial zoning districts is to ensure that a full range of retail and office uses are available throughout the City so that residents can fulfill all or most of their needs within easy driving and, ideally within easy walking and/or biking distance of their homes. The location of land within each commercial district must be carefully selected and design and development standards created to minimize the potential adverse impacts of commercial activity on established residential areas. At the same time, it is important to create more opportunities for mixed use, including residential, commercial and institutional activities, in new and re-developing commercial areas. B. Facilitate economic goals. Another purpose of these regulations is to ensure that there is a full range of economic activities and job opportunities within the City limits, in compliance with the economic goals of the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Response: The proposed development and major modification of existing development are in support of commercial activities which are appropriate to the purpose of the General Commercial District. 18.520.020 List of Zoning Districts A. C-N: Neighborhood Commercial District. ... B. C-C: Community Commercial District. ... C. C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non- conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment,and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. D. C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. ... E. CBD: Central Business District. ... F. MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. ... G. MUE-1 and MUE-2: Mixed Use Employment Districts. ... H. MUC: Mixed Use Commercial District. ... I. MUC-1: Mixed Use Commercial— 1. ... J. MUR: Mixed Use Residential Districts. ... Response: The proposed development is within the General Commercial District. The proposed development and major modification of existing development are in support of commercial activities which are appropriate to the purpose of the General Commercial District. 18.520.030 Uses The proposed development and major modification of existing development are in support of commercial activities (General Retail — Sales Oriented, Eating and Drinking Establishments, and the Park-and-Ride lot)which are permitted uses in the General Commercial District. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-22 November 25,2003 18.520.040 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapters 18.310 and 18.320; 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. B. Development standards. Response: Development standards for the General Commercial zoning district are contained in Table 18.520.2. The standards for this district are as follows: • Minimum lot size=0 square feet • Average minimum lot width=50 feet • Maximum building height=45 feet • Setbacks: Front=0 feet; Side=0 feet; Rear=0 feet;and Corner=0 feet from street. • Maximum site coverage=85% • Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area= 15% There are no changes proposed to the existing structures and there are no new buildings proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. The proposed improvements do not impact the ability of the existing development on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 to meet these standards. The proposed development would reduce this amount by 1,970 square feet, resulting in an overall landscape coverage of 21%; thus, the site will remain in compliance with this standard. The proposed new parking area for the Village Inn restaurant complies with the maximum site coverage and minimum landscape requirements of this section. 18.520.050 Special Limitations on Uses A. In the C-N zone. B. In the C-C zone. C. In the MUE zone. D. In the MUC-1 zone. E. In the MUC, MUE-1, MUE-2,MUR-1 and MUR-2 zones. Response: These sections are not applicable to development within the C-G district. 18.520.060 Additional Development and Design Guidelines A. Development/design guidelines in the C-C zone. B. Interim requirements in the CBD zone. C. Washington Square Regional Center. Response: These sections are not applicable to development within the C-G district. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-23 November 25,2003 E. CONFORMANCE WITH TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.705 (ACCESS/EGRESS/CIRCULATION) 18.705.010 Purpose A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards and regulations for safe and efficient vehicle access and egress on a site and for general circulation within the site. Response: As described in the Traffic Impact Analysis [Exhibit 61, the placement of the proposed accesses was identified in collaboration with Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Washington County, City of Tualatin, and City of Tigard staff as part of the overall transportation improvement program for the larger Bridgeport Village development (which included the new Village Inn site)to ensure optimal traffic operations along SW Bridgeport Road, SW 72nd Avenue, and at the Interstate 5/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road interchange while still providing access to the existing businesses within the study area. 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures,the remodeling of existing structures(see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. B. Change or enlargement of use. Should the owner or occupant of a lot or building change or enlarge the use to which the lot or building is put, thereby increasing access and egress requirements, it is unlawful and is a violation of this title to begin or maintain such altered use until the provisions of this chapter have been met if required or until the appropriate approval authority has approved the change. C. When site design review is not required. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, do not apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an access plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter in conjunction with another permit or land use action. D. Conflict with subdivision requirements. The requirements and standards of this chapter shall not apply where they conflict with the subdivision rules and standards of this title. Response: The provisions of this chapter apply to the proposed development. 18.705.030 General Provisions A. Continuing obligation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City. Response: The applicant understands that the provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City. B. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Response: Scaled plans showing how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled are included in this application. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-24 November 25,2003 C. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: 1. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds,easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and 2. Copies of the deeds,easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Response: The property owners have agreed to a series of property transfers in order to establish the new parcel configuration and have agreed to joint use of the proposed new access drive. Legal evidence in the form of easements will establish joint use. Copies of these easements will be placed on permanent file with the City. D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Response: The park-and-ride facility and the new Village Inn restaurant are proposed to connect to SW 72°1 Avenue via an access drive. The existing retail uses on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 will also have a connection to the access drive. The access drive will be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. E. Curb cuts.Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N. Response: Curb cuts will be provided in accordance with Section 18.810.030. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; 2. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; 3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts,and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-25 November 25,2003 Response: There are no changes proposed to the existing structures and there are no new buildings proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. Existing walkways serving existing retail uses will be maintained. The proposed access drive has been designed for pedestrian safety and in compliance with ADA standards. G. Inadequate or hazardous access. 1. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the Commission for review when, in the opinion of the Director,the access proposed: a. Would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or b. Would provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or c. Would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health,safety,and general welfare. 2. Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. If direct access is permitted by the City, the applicant will be required to mitigate for any safety or neighborhood traffic management (NTM) impacts deemed applicable by the City Engineer. This may include, but will not be limited to, the construction of a vehicle turnaround on the site to eliminate the need for a vehicle to back out onto the roadway. 3. In no case shall the design of the service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are exempt from this requirement. Response: No inadequate or hazardous accesses are proposed as part of this application. No access for single-family or duplex lots is being proposed and the design of the accesses will not require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street. H. Access Management 1. An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO(depending on jurisdiction of facility.) 2. Driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical,the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. 3. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. 4. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. Response: SW 72°d is an arterial with a minimum spacing of 600 feet for driveways and arterials. As described in the Traffic Impact Analysis [Exhibit 6], the placement of the proposed access drive was identified in collaboration with Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Washington County, City of Tualatin,and City of Tigard staff as part of the overall transportation City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-26 November 25,2003 improvement program for the larger Bridgeport Village development (which included the new Village Inn site) to ensure optimal traffic operations along SW Bridgeport Road, SW 72" Avenue, and at the Interstate 5/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road interchange while still providing access to the existing businesses within the study area. The applicant also is seeking approval of a Type H Access/Egress Adjustment pursuant to Section 18.370.020 C3b in order to retain the existing unsignalized central driveway serving the existing retail uses on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 as a limited right-in/right-out access. I. Minimum access requirements for residential use. Response: Not applicable. J. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use. 1. Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than 21 as provided in Table 18.705.3; TABLE 18.705.3 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES Required Parking Minimum Number of Minimum Access Minimum Pavement Spaces Driveways Width Required _ 0-99 1 30' 24' curbs required 100+ 2 30' 24' curbs required or 50' 40' curbs required 1 2. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; 3. Additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. Response: The proposed accesses provide the minimum number of driveways required to serve the existing and proposed uses. Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 would have two signalized accesses and a right-in/right-out driveway between the two signals. The shared access with the North TriMet Park& Ride facility, and the new Village Inn restaurant pad is recommended to be 40 feet wide accommodating three lanes. There will be 6-foot sidewalks along both sides. The right- in/right-out access will have the same width as today (approximately 30 feet) with an existing 6- foot sidewalk along the south side of the driveway. K. One-way vehicular access points. Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. Response: No one-way vehicular access points are proposed; therefore, this standard is not applicable. L. Director's authority to restrict access. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-27 November 25,2003 Response: The applicant understands that the Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so to provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems and that the director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health,safety,and general welfare. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review ii-28 November 25, 2003 F. CONFORMANCE WITH THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.745 (LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING STANDARDS) 18.745.010 Purpose A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards for landscaping, buffering, and screening of land use within Tigard in order to enhance the aesthetic environmental quality of the City: 1. By protecting existing street trees and requiring the planting of street trees in new developments; 2. By using plant materials as a unifying element; 3. By using planting materials to define spaces and articulate the uses of specific areas; and 4. By using trees and other landscaping materials to mitigate the effects of the sun, wind,noise and lack of privacy by the provision of buffering and screening. Response: As shown on the Landscape Plan [Exhibit 5], perimeter landscaping between the Village Inn parking area and the accessway will be used to define the spaces and articulate the uses of specific areas. As noted in the Arborist Report [Exhibit b, memo 3c], ninety-seven percent (97%) of the existing trees will be protected and retained. In addition, new trees and other landscaping materials are proposed which are intended to mitigate the effects of the development. 18.745.020 Applicability A. Applicability. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, remodeling of existing structures where the landscaping is nonconforming (Section 18.760.040.C), and to a change of use which results in the need for increased on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Response: There are no changes proposed to the existing structures and there are no new structures proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. As shown on the Site Development Plan [Exhibit 2], the existing retail development on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 within the City of Tigard is not nonconforming with respect to landscaping. Where additional landscaping has been required for the new parking area and access, it will be designed in compliance with this section. B. When site development review does not apply. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.360,. Site Development Review, do not apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030,using the applicable standards in this chapter. Response: This section is not applicable. C. Site plan requirements. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Response: A site plan prepared in compliance with the submission requirements is included as part of this application. 18.7.45.030 General Provisions A. Obligation to maintain. Unless otherwise provided by the lease agreement, the owner, tenant and his agent, if any, shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping and City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-29 November 25,2003 screening which shall be maintained in good condition so as to present a healthy, neat and orderly appearance, shall be replaced or repaired as necessary, and shall be kept free from refuse and debris. Response: The applicant understands that maintenance of all landscaping and screening shall be the responsibility of the owner, tenant and/or agent, unless otherwise provided by lease agreement. B. Pruning required. All plant growth in landscaped areas of developments shall be controlled by pruning,trimming or otherwise so that: 1. It will not interfere with the maintenance or repair of any public utility; 2. It will not restrict pedestrian or vehicular access; and 3. It will not constitute a traffic hazard because of reduced visibility. Response: All plant growth in landscape areas will be maintained by proper pruning in accordance with this section. C. Installation requirements. The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures; 2. The plant materials shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock(ANSI Z60, 1-1986,and any future revisions);and 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. Response: All required landscaping will be selected and installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. D. Certificate of Occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. Response: The applicant understands that certificates of occupancy will not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements acceptable to the City have been made. E. Protection of existing vegetation. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced,as in snow fencing which can be placed around individual trees). Response: As shown on the Tree RemovaUPreservation and Mitigation Plan [Exhibit 3, Sheet 313] and on the Landscape Plan [Exhibit 5],the plants which are intended to be retained have been noted and a method of protection has been established to protect these plants during the construction process. F. Care of landscaping along public rights-of-way. Appropriate methods for the care and maintenance of street trees and landscaping materials shall be provided by the owner of the property abutting the rights-of-way unless otherwise required for emergency conditions and the safety of the general public. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-30 November 25,2003 Response: The applicant understands that care and maintenance of street trees and landscaping materials within the right-of-way are the responsibility of the owner of the property abutting the right-of-way unless otherwise required for emergency conditions and public safety. G. Conditions of approval of existing vegetation. The review procedures and standards for required landscaping and screening shall be specified in the conditions of approval during development review and in no instance shall be less than that required for conventional development. Response: The applicant understands that the review procedures and standards for required landscaping and screening will be specified in the conditions of approval. H. Height restrictions abutting public rights-of-way.No trees,shrubs or plantings more than 18 inches in height shall be planted in the public right-of-way abutting roadways having no established curb and gutter. Response: SW 72°" Avenue has established curbs and gutters; therefore, this standard is not applicable along that public right-of-way. 18.745.040 Street Trees A. Protection of existing vegetation. All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040.C. Response: The proposed access drive is approximately 80 feet in length and therefore is not subject to this requirement. The development site also fronts on SW 72' Avenue. The existing street trees along the northern portion of the frontage will not be impacted by the proposed development. The requirement for additional street trees along the realigned portion of SW 72°d Avenue will be addressed as part of the overall street design process and will be subject to this standard as part of a separate review. B. Street tree planting list. Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or can cause personal injury. Approval of any planting list shall be subject to review by the Director. Response: The requirement for additional street trees along the realigned portion of SW 72°d Avenue will be addressed as part of the overall street design process and will be subject to this standard as part of a separate review. C. Size and spacing of street trees. 1. Landscaping in the front and exterior side yards shall include trees with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height as specified in the requirements stated in Section 18.745.040.C.2 below; 2. The specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as follows: a. Small or narrow-stature trees under 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet apart; b. Medium-sized trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall, 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; c. Large trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet apart; City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-31 November 25,2003 d. Except for signalized intersections as provided in Section 18.745.040.H, trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet from a street intersection, nor closer than two feet from private driveways (measured at the back edge of the sidewalk), fire hydrants or utility poles to maintain visual clearance; e. No new utility pole location shall be established closer than five feet to any existing street tree; f. Tree pits shall be located so as not to include utilities (e.g., water and gas meters) in the tree well; g. On-premises utilities (e.g., water and gas meters) shall not be installed within existing tree well areas; h. Street trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet to light standards; i. New light standards shall not be positioned closer than 20 feet to existing street trees except when public safety dictates,then they may be positioned no closer than 10 feet; j. Where there are overhead power lines, the street tree species selected shall be of a type which,at full maturity, will not interfere with the lines; k. Trees shall not be planted within two feet from the face of the curb; and 1. Trees shall not be planted within two feet of any permanent hard surface paving or walkway: (1) Space between the tree and the hard surface may be covered by a nonpermanent hard surface such as grates, bricks on sand, paver blocks and cobblestones; and (2) Sidewalk cuts in concrete for tree planting shall be at least four by four feet to allow for air and water into the root area. Response: The requirement for additional street trees along the realigned portion of SW 72"d Avenue will be addressed as part of the overall street design process and will be subject to this standard as part of a separate review. D. Pruning requirements. Trees, as they grow, shall be pruned to provide at least eight feet of clearance above sidewalks and 13 feet above local street, 15 feet above collector street, and 18 feet above arterial street roadway surfaces. Response: The existing street trees along SW 72"d Avenue appear to have been, and will continue to be, appropriately pruned in accordance with this section. The requirement for additional street trees along the realigned portion of SW 72"d Avenue will be addressed as part of the overall street design process and will be subject to this standard as part of a separate review. E. Cut and fill around existing trees. Existing trees may be used as street trees if no cutting or filling takes place within the drip-line of the tree unless an adjustment is approved by the Director by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020.0.4.a. Response: The existing street trees along SW 72"d Avenue, which are proposed to be retained as part of this project,will be protected from cutting or filling within the drip-line. F. Replacement of street trees. Existing street trees removed by development projects or other construction shall be replaced by the developer with those types of trees approved by the Director. The replacement trees shall be of a size and species similar to the trees that are being removed unless lesser sized alternatives are approved by the Director. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-32 November 25, 2003 Response: The existing street trees along the northern portion of the frontage will not be impacted by the proposed development. The requirement for additional street trees along the realigned portion of SW 72" Avenue will be addressed as part of the overall street design process and will be subject to this standard as part of a separate review. G. Granting of adjustments. Adjustments to the street tree requirements may be granted by the Director by means of a Type I procedure, as regulated in Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020.C.4.b. Response: No adjustment to the street tree requirement is being requested at this time; therefore this section is not applicable. H. Location of trees near signalized intersections. The Director may allow trees closer to specified intersections which are signalized, provided the provisions of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance, are satisfied. Response: The requirement for additional street trees along the realigned portion of SW 72"d Avenue will be addressed as part of the overall street design process and will be subject to this standard as part of a separate review. 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening A. General provisions. 1. It is the intent that these requirements shall provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution at a development site, without unduly interfering with the view from neighboring properties or jeopardizing the safety of pedestrians and vehicles; 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix; 3. In lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. Response: Existing abutting uses include the following: • North: Light Industrial district • East: arterial street(Interstate-5), • South: parking lot (the Tri-Met park and ride facility) and General Commercial zoning in the City of Tualatin,and • West: arterial street(SW 72"d). Pursuant to Table 18.745.1, no buffering is required between a development within the General Commercial (CG) district when the existing abutting uses are commercial zones (including CG), parking lots,and arterial streets. The proposed development does not impact the northern portion of the subject site, which is adjacent to the Light Industrial district; therefore, no alteration of the existing buffering is proposed. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-33 November 25,2003 B. Buffering and screening requirements. Response: Pursuant to Table 18.745.1, no buffering is required between a development within the General Commercial (CG) district when the existing abutting uses are commercial zones (including CG), parking lots, and arterial streets. The proposed development does not impact the northern portion of the subject site,which is adjacent to the Light Industrial district; therefore, no alteration of the existing buffering is proposed. C. Setbacks for fences or walls. 1. No fence or wall shall be constructed which exceeds the standards in Section 18.745.050.C.2 except when the approval authority, as a condition of approval, allows that a fence or wall be constructed to a height greater than otherwise permitted to mitigate against potential adverse effects; 2. Fences or walls: a. May not exceed three feet in height in a required front yard along local streets or eight feet in all other locations and, in all other cases, shall meet vision clearance area requirements in Chapter 18.795; b. Are permitted up to six feet in height in front yards adjacent to any designated arterial or collector street. For any fence over three feet in height in the required front yard area, permission shall be subject to administrative review of the location of the fence or wall. 3. All fences or walls shall meet vision clearance area requirements in Chapter 18.795; 4. All fences or walls greater than six feet in height shall be subject to building permit approval. Response: As shown on the Landscape Plan [Exhibit 5], no new fences or walls are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. D. Height restrictions. 1. The prescribed heights of required fences, walls or landscaping shall be measured from the actual adjoining level of finished grade, except that where parking, loading, storage or similar areas are located above finished grade, the height of fences, walls or landscaping required to screen such areas or space shall be measured from the level of such improvements; 2. An earthen berm and fence or wall combination shall not exceed the six-foot height limitation for screening. Response: As shown on the Landscape Plan [Exhibit 5],no new fences,walls or earthen berms are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. E. Screening: special provisions. 1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: (1) Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms,decorative walls and raised planters; (2) Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; (3) Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-34 November 25,2003 (4) Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect;and (5) The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. 2. Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; 3. Screening of swimming pools. All swimming pools shall be enclosed as required by City of Tigard Building Code; 4. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one-and two-family dwellings,any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence,masonry wall or evergreen hedge.All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. Response: The existing landscaping,which provides screening for the existing parking lot,will be retained. Screening for the existing loading areas, service facilities, and refuse collection areas will not be altered as a result of this application. As shown on the Landscape Plan — Detail [Exhibit 5, Sheet 5B], the proposed new parking area for the restaurant has been screened in accordance with this section. No new loading areas, service facilities, swimming pools or refuse collection areas are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. F. Buffer Matrix. 1. The Buffer Matrices contained in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 shall be used in calculating widths of buffering/screening and required improvements to be installed between proposed uses and abutting uses or zoning districts; 2. An application for a variance to the standards required in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2, shall be processed as a Type II procedure, as regulated by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.010. (Ord. 02-33) Response: Pursuant to Table 18.745.1, no buffering is required between a development within the General Commercial (CG) district when the existing abutting uses are commercial zones (including CG), parking lots, and arterial streets. The proposed development does not impact the northern portion of the subject site,which is adjacent to the Light Industrial district; no alteration of the existing buffering is proposed. Therefore,this section is not applicable. 18.745.060 Re-vegetation A. When re-vegetation is required. Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping requirements and that are not to be occupied by structures, such areas are to be replanted as set forth in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are completed. B. Preparation for re-vegetation. Topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the sites and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway; and City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review H-35 November 25,2003 1. Such storage may not be located where it would cause suffocation of root systems of trees intended to be preserved; and 2. After completion of such grading, the topsoil is to be restored to exposed cut and fill embankments or building pads to provide a suitable base for seeding and planting. C. Methods of re-vegetation. 1. Acceptable methods of re-vegetation include hydro-mulching or the planting of rye grass, barley, or other seed with equivalent germination rates, and: a. Where lawn or turf grass is to be established, lawn grass seed or other appropriate landscape cover is to be sown at not less than four pounds to each 1,000 square feet of land area; b. Other re-vegetation methods offering equivalent protection may be approved by the approval authority; c. Plant materials are to be watered at intervals sufficient to ensure survival and growth; and d. The use of native plant materials is encouraged to reduce irrigation and maintenance demands. Response: There are no existing areas of natural vegetation which will be affected by the proposed development activities. All areas which will be disturbed by the proposed development will be either landscaped or paved. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review Ii-36 November 25,2003 G. CONFORMANCE WITH THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.755 (MIXED SOLID WASTE/RECYCLING STORAGE) 18.755.010 Purpose and Applicability A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that certain new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable materials prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. B. Applicability. The mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non-residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow,outright or by condition,for such uses. Response: Existing mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable collection and storage areas associated with the existing development will not be altered as a result of this application. No new mixed solid waste and source-separated collection and storage areas are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. 18.755.020 Definitions Response: Existing mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable collection and storage areas associated with the existing development will not be altered as a result of this application. No new mixed solid waste and source-separated collection and storage areas are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. 18.755.030 Materials Accepted Response: Existing mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable collection and storage areas associated with the existing development will not be altered as a result of this application. No new mixed solid waste and source-separated collection and storage areas are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. 18.755.040 Methods of Demonstrating Compliance Response: Existing methods of compliance for the management of mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclables associated with the existing development will not be altered as a result of this application. Solid waste and recycling for the Village Inn development are being addressed by the City of Tualatin through its development review process. The portion of the new Village Inn development proposed within the City of Tigard is not expected to generate any additional solid waste or recyclables. 18.755.050 Location,Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas Response: Existing mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable collection and storage areas associated with the existing development will not be altered as a result of this application. No new mixed solid waste and source-separated collection and storage areas are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. Solid waste and recycling for the Village Inn development are being addressed by the City of Tualatin through its development review process. The service provider has reviewed the proposed arrangements for mixed solid waste and source- City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-37 November 25,2003 separated recyclable collection and storage in conjunction with application to the City of Tualatin for the Village Inn restaurant,their letter is included in Exhibit 8. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-38 November 25,2003 I-1 j H. CONFORMANCE WITH TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.765 (OFF- STREET PARKING/LOADING REQUIREMENTS) 18.765.010 Purpose A. Insure adequate vehicle parking. These parking requirements are intended to provide sufficient vehicle parking in close proximity to the various uses for residents, customers and employees, and to establish standards which will maintain the traffic carrying-capacity of nearby streets. B. Adequate capacity. These regulations are also intended to establish vehicle parking areas which have adequate capacity and which are appropriately located and designed to minimize any hazardous conditions on the site and at access points. Response: The existing retail uses on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 (Borders) are currently served by approximately 349 off-street parking spaces. The proposed new access drive will result in the loss of two parking off-street parking spaces currently serving existing retail uses; however, the existing uses will remain in compliance with the standards of this chapter. The proposed development does include all or a portion of six new parking spaces, which are designed to serve the proposed Village Inn restaurant, but which will be located in the City of Tigard. These spaces will help provide sufficient vehicle parking in close proximity to the new restaurant. 18.765.020 Applicability of Provisions A. New construction. At the time of the erection of a new structure within any zoning district, off-street vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070. B. Expansion of existing use. At the time of an enlargement of a structure which increases the on-site vehicle parking requirements, off-street vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070 subject to the following: 1. On the date of adoption of this title, the number of vehicle parking and loading spaces required shall be based only on floor area or capacity of such enlargement; 2. If the minimum vehicle parking spaces required for the enlargement added to the existing on-site space exceed the maximum number of vehicle parking spaces allowed for the whole project per the maximum parking ratios established in 18.765.070, the applicant may reduce the additional number of spaces provided so that the total spaces on the site do not exceed the maximum spaces allowed. C. Change of use. When an existing structure is changed from one use to another use as listed in Section 18.765.070,the following provisions shall apply: 1. If the parking requirements for each use are the same, no additional vehicle parking shall be required; 2. Where a change results in an intensification of use in terms of the number of vehicle parking spaces required, additional vehicle parking spaces shall be provided in an amount equal to the difference between the number of spaces required for the existing use and the number of spaces required for the more intensive use; 3. Where the change results in a decrease in intensity of use, the applicant may eliminate excess vehicle parking spaces in an amount equal to the difference between the number of spaces required for the existing use and the number of spaces required for the less intensive use. D. When site design review is not required. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, do not apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter by means of a Type I review,as governed by Section 18.390.030. E. Building permit conditions. The provision and maintenance of off-street vehicle parking and loading spaces are the continuing obligation of the property owner: City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-39 November 25,2003 1. No building or other permit shall be issued until plans are presented to the Director to show that property is and will remain available for exclusive use as off-street vehicle parking and loading space;and 2. The subsequent use of property for which the building permit is issued shall be conditional upon the unqualified continuance and availability of the amount of vehicle parking and loading space required by this title; 3. Required vehicle parking shall: a. Be available for the parking of operable passenger vehicles of residents, patron and employees only; b. Not be used for storage of vehicles or materials or for the parking of trucks used in conduct of the business or use;and c. Not be rented, leased or assigned to any other person or organization. Response: There are a total of 80 new parking spaces proposed to serve the new Village Inn restaurant. All or a portion of six (6) of these parking spaces will be located in the City of Tigard and are subject to the standards of this chapter. This application does not include any proposed expansion or enlargement of an existing structure or change of use. The applicant understands that the provision and maintenance of off-street vehicle parking and loading spaces are the continuing obligation of the property owner. 18.765.030 General Provisions A. Vehicle parking plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Response: Exhibit 2 [Site Development Plan] provides a scaled plans identifying how the access,egress and circulation requirements will be fulfilled. B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 500 feet from the property line that they are required to serve, measured along the most direct, publicly accessible pedestrian route from the property line with the following exceptions: 3. Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 500 feet from the primary site; 4. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: a. Disabled-accessible spaces; b. Short-term spaces; c. Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; d. Long-term spaces. Response: There are a total of 80 new parking spaces proposed to serve the new Village Inn restaurant. All or a portion of six of these parking spaces will be located in the City of Tigard and are subject to the standards of this chapter. As shown on the Site Development Plan [Exhibit 2], the parking spaces which are located within the City of Tigard are the furthest from the proposed City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-40 November 25,2003 new Village Inn restaurant. Disabled-accessible spaces and carpool/vanpool spaces have been located within the City of Tualatin and closer to the restaurant entrance. C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est)use per Section 18.765.070; 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Response: There are a total of 80 new parking spaces proposed to serve the new Village Inn restaurant. All or a portion of six of these parking spaces will be located in the City of Tigard and are subject to the standards of this chapter. None of these spaces are proposed for joint parking; therefore these standards are not applicable. D. Parking in mixed-use projects. In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1. Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100%of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2. Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90%of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3. Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4. The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. Response: There are a total of 80 new parking spaces proposed to serve the new Village Inn restaurant. All or a portion of six of these parking spaces will be located in the City of Tigard and are subject to the standards of this chapter. The proposed Village Inn restaurant is not a mixed use project; therefore,these standards are not applicable. E. Visitor parking in multi-family residential developments. Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. Response: The proposal does not include any multi-family residential development; therefore, this standard is not applicable. F. Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking. Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5%of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-41 November 25,2003 requirements in Section 18.765.040.N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. Response: There are a total of 80 new parking spaces proposed to serve the new Village Inn restaurant. All or a portion of six of these parking spaces will be located in the City of Tigard and are subject to the standards of this chapter. As shown on the Site Development Plan [Exhibit 2], the parking spaces which are located within the City of Tigard are the furthest from the proposed new Village Inn restaurant. Carpoollvanpool spaces have been located within the City of Tualatin and closer to the restaurant entrance. G. Disabled-accessible parking. All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. Response: There are a total of 80 new parking spaces proposed to serve the new Village Inn restaurant. All or a portion of six of these parking spaces will be located in the City of Tigard and are subject to the standards of this chapter. As shown on the Site Development Plan [Exhibit 2], the parking spaces that are located within the City of Tigard are the furthest from the proposed new Village Inn restaurant. Disabled-accessible parking spaces have been located within the City of Tualatin and closer to the restaurant entrance. H. DEQ indirect source construction permit. All parking lots containing 250 spaces or parking structures containing two or more levels shall require review by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)to: 1. Acquire an Indirect Source Construction Permit; 2. Investigate the feasibility of installing oil and grease separators. Response: There are a total of 80 new parking spaces proposed to serve the new Village Inn restaurant. All or a portion of six of these parking spaces will be located in the City of Tigard and are subject to the standards of this chapter; therefore,this standard is not applicable. 18.765.040 General Design Standards A. Maintenance of parking areas. All parking lots shall be kept clean and in good repair at all times. Breaks in paved surfaces shall be repaired promptly and broken or splintered wheel stops shall be replaced so that their function will not be impaired. Response: The applicant understands that the provision and maintenance of off-street vehicle parking and loading spaces are the continuing obligation of the property owner. B. Access drives. With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: 1. Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; 2. The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705,Access,Egress and Circulation; 3. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-42 November 25,2003 4. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; 5. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and 6. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. Response: As shown on the Site Development Plan [Exhibit 2], the proposed access drive has been designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site. It has been improved with asphalt. The access drives has been clearly marked and defined and complies with the minimum vision clearance requirements in Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance. The applicant is requesting an adjustment to the requirements of Chapter, 18.705,Access,Egress and Circulation. C. Loading/unloading driveways. A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger • vehicles for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time. Response: There are no loading/unloading driveways proposed; therefore, this section is not applicable. D. On-site vehicle stacking for drive-in use. Response: There are drive-in facilities proposed; therefore,this section is not applicable. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N. Response: Curb cuts will be provided in accordance with 18.810.030. F. Pedestrian access. Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Response: As shown on the Site Development Plan [Exhibit 2], pedestrian access through parking lots has been provided. G. Parking lot landscaping. Parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.745. Response: As shown on the Landscape Plan [Exhibit 5], proposed new parking areas have been landscaped in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.745. H. Parking space surfacing. 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in 18.765.040.H.3 and 4 below, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle,boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces; City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-43 November 25,2003 2. Off-street parking spaces for single and two-family residences shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; 3. Parking areas to be used primarily for the storage of fleet vehicles or construction equipment may be surfaced in gravel when authorized by the approval authority at the time the site development approval is given. ... 4. Parking areas to be used in conjunction with a temporary use may be surfaced in gravel when authorized by the approval authority at the time the permit is approved.... Response: All areas proposed to be used for the parking or maneuvering of vehicles will be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces. No residential is development is proposed as part of this application. No parking areas to be used primarily for the storage of fleet vehicles or construction is equipment or temporary uses are proposed as part of this application. I. Parking lot striping. 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off- street parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and 2. All interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. Response: Parking spaces will be clearly marked and the interior drives and access aisles have will be signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. J. Wheel stops. Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. Response: There are a total of 80 new parking spaces proposed to serve the new Village Inn restaurant. All or a portion of six of these parking spaces will be located in the City of Tigard and are subject to the standards of this chapter. These six spaces are along the boundary of the parking lot will be provided with wheel stops at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall in accordance with this requirement. K. Drainage. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be drained in accordance with specifications approved by the City Engineer to ensure that ponds do not occur except for single-family and duplex residences, off-street parking and loading facilities shall be drained to avoid flow of water across public sidewalks. Response: Proposed off-street parking areas will be designed to drain to avoid ponding and the flow of water across public sidewalks. L. Lighting. A lights providing to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. Response: There are no adjacent residential districts; therefore this standard is not applicable. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-44 November 25,2003 M. Signs. Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. Response: Signs which are placed on parking lots will be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780. N. Space and aisle dimensions. (Figure 18.765.1) Stall width dimensions may be distributed as follows: 50% standard spaces, 50%compact spaces. All compact spaces shall be labeled as such. 1. Except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: a. 8.5.x 18.5. for a standard space; b. 7.5. x 16.5. for a compact space;and c. As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; d. The width of each parking space includes a stripe which separates each space. 2. Aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width; 3. Minimum standards for a standard parking stall's length and width, aisle width, and maneuvering space shall be determined as noted in Figure 18.765.2. Response: There are a total of 80 new parking spaces proposed to serve the Village Inn restaurant; of which 56 spaces are standard (70%); 21 spaces are compact (26%); and 3 spaces (4%) are designated for disabled persons. There six parking spaces which fall entirely or partially within the City of Tigard;two (2)of which are standard and four(4)of which are compact. 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards Response: Existing bicycle parking associated with the existing development will not be altered as a result of this application. Bicycle parking for the Village Inn development is being addressed by the City of Tualatin through its development review process. Therefore, no new bicycle parking facilities are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application. 18.765.060 Parking Structure Design Standards Response: No parking structures are proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application; therefore,this standard is not applicable. 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements Response: The proposed new access drive will not impact the amount or arrangement of parking serving existing retail uses within the City of Tigard (e.g., Borders). The proposed development does include all or a portion of six new parking spaces, which are designed to serve the proposed Village Inn restaurant,but which will be located in the City of Tigard. These spaces will help provide sufficient vehicle parking in close proximity to the new restaurant. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review ii-45 November 25,2003 18.765.080 Off-Street Loading Requirements Response: The existing retail uses on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 (Borders and Bed, Bath and Beyond) are currently served by approximately 349 off-street parking spaces. The existing retail development on this site is approximately 71,000 square feet. The minimum required number of spaces for the existing sales-oriented general retail uses is 263 (3.7 spaces/1000 square feet). The proposed new access drive will result in the loss of two parking off-street parking spaces currently serving existing retail uses. However, the existing uses will remain in compliance with this standard. The proposed development also includes all or a portion of six new parking spaces, which are designed to serve the proposed Village Inn restaurant, but which will be located in the City of Tigard. However, as shown on the Site Development Plan [Exhibit 2], loading facilities intended to serve the new Village Inn restaurant are located within the City of Tualatin and are subject to review under the Tualatin Development Code. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-46 November 25,2003 I. CONFORMANCE WITH THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.790 (TREE REMOVAL) 18.790.010 Purpose A. Value of trees. After years of both natural growth and planting by residents, the City now benefits from a large number of trees. These trees of varied types add to the aesthetic beauty of the community, help clean the air, help control erosion, maintain water quality and provide noise barriers. B. Purposes. The purposes of this chapter are to: 1. Encourage the preservation,planting and replacement of trees in the City; 2. Regulate the removal of trees on sensitive lands in the City to eliminate unnecessary removal of trees; 3. Provide for a tree plan for developing properties; 4. Protect sensitive lands from erosion; 5. Protect water quality; 6. Provide incentives for tree retention and protection;and 7. Regulate commercial forestry to control the removal of trees in an urban environment. C. Recognize need for exceptions. The City recognizes that, notwithstanding these purposes, at the time of development it may be necessary to remove certain trees in order to accommodate structures, streets utilities, and other needed or required improvements within the development. Response: Existing trees on site have been preserved to the extent feasible. As shown in Exhibit 3, Sheet 3B, development of the access drive will result in the loss of two trees larger than 12-inches in diameter on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 (Borders); however,ninety-seven percent(97%) of the existing trees will be retained. As shown on the Landscape Plan — Detail [Exhibit 5, Sheet 5B],the landscaping for the new Village Inn site includes 18 new trees,two of which are in the City of Tigard. 18.790.020 Definitions Response: The applicant understands that these definitions apply to regulations governing the preservation and removal of trees contained in this chapter exclusively. 18.790.030 Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-47 November 25,2003 b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75%or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. C. Subsequent tree removal. Trees removed within the period of one year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060D. Response: A Tree Plan prepared by a certified arborist in conformance with this section is included as Exhibit 3,Sheet 3B and Memo 3C. 18.790.040 Incentives for Tree Retention A. Incentives. To assist in the preservation and retention of existing trees,the Director may apply one or more of the following incentives as part of development review approval and the provisions of a tree plan according to Section 18.790.030: 1. Density bonus. For each 2% of canopy cover provided by existing trees over 12 inches in caliper that are preserved and incorporated into a development plan, a 1% bonus may be applied to density computations of Chapter 18.715.No more than a 20% bonus may be granted for any one development. The percentage density bonus shall be applied to the number of dwelling units allowed in the underlying zone. This bonus is not applicable to trees preserved in areas of floodplain, slopes greater than 25%, drainageways, or wetlands that would otherwise be precluded from development; 2. Lot size averaging. To retain existing trees over 12 inches in caliper in the development plan for any land division under Chapter 18.400, lot size may be averaged to allow lots less than the minimum lot size allowed by the underlying zone as long as the average lot area for all lots and private open space is not less than that allowed by the underlying zone. No lot area shall be less than 80%of the minimum lot size allowed in the zone; 3. Lot width and depth. To retain existing trees over 12 inches in caliper in the development plan for any land division under Chapter 18.400, lot width and lot depth may be reduced up to 20%of that required by the underlying zone; 4. Commercial/industrial/civic use parking. For each 2%of canopy cover provided by existing trees over 12 inches in caliper that are preserved and incorporated into a development plan for commercial, industrial or civic uses listed in Section 18.765.080, Minimum and Maximum Off- Street Parking Requirements,a 1%reduction in the amount of required parking may be granted. 5. No more than a 20% reduction in the required amount of parking may be granted for any one development; (1) Commercial/industrial/civic use landscaping. For each 2% of canopy cover provided by existing trees over 12 inches in caliper that are preserved and incorporated into a development plan,a 1%reduction in the required amount of landscaping may be granted. No more than 20% of the required amount of landscaping may be reduced for any one development. B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-48 November 25,2003 condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. C. Site development modifications granted as incentives. A modification to development requirements granted under this section shall not conflict with any other restriction on the use of the property, including but not limited to easements and conditions of development approval. D. Design modifications of public improvements. The City Engineer may adjust design specifications of public improvements to accommodate tree retention where possible and where it would not interfere with safety or increase maintenance costs. Response: The applicant is not seeking any incentives for tree retention. 18.790.050 Permit Applicability Response: Tree removal permits are required only for the removal of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area. There are no trees within sensitive lands as defined by Chapter 18.775 proposed for removal as part of this application; therefore no tree removal permits are required. 18.790.060 Illegal Tree Removal Response: The applicant understands that removal of a tree without a valid tree removal permit; or in noncompliance with any condition of approval of a tree removal permit; or in noncompliance with any condition of any City permit or development approval; or in noncompliance with any other section of this title constitutes a violation of this chapter. The applicant also understands that a breach of a condition of any City permit or development approval, which results in damage to a tree or its root system, constitutes a violation. The applicant understands that a replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species taking into consideration site characteristics and availability and that the number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the City, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. In lieu of tree replacement, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-49 November 25,2003 J. CONFORMANCE WITH THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.795 (VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS) 18.795.010 Purpose A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards which will assure proper sight distances at intersections to reduce the hazard from vehicular turning movements. Response: Intersections proposed as part of this application will be designed to assure proper site distance. 18.795.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. B. When site development review is not required. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.330, Site Development Review, do not apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter through a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using the standards in this chapter as approval criteria. Response: There are no changes proposed to the existing structures or uses and there are no new structures proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application; however, the proposed development will result in a change of access for the existing retail uses on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700. 18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements A. At corners. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. B. Obstructions prohibited. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. C. Additional topographical constraints. Where the crest of a hill or vertical curve conditions contribute to the obstruction of clear vision areas at a street or driveway intersection, hedges, plantings, fences, walls, wall structures and temporary or permanent obstructions shall be further reduced in height or eliminated to comply with the intent of the required clear vision area. Response: The intersection of the proposed new access drive with SW 72" Avenue, and the new access and the modified right-in/right-out access into the parking lot of Tax Lot 2S113AD- 01700 will be designed and constructed to provide visual clearance areas in compliance with the standards of this section. 18.795.040 Computations A. Arterial streets. On all designated arterial streets the visual clearance area shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. B. Non-arterial streets. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-50 November 25,2003 1. Non-arterial streets 24 feet or more in width. At all intersections of two non-arterial streets, a nonarterial street and a driveway, and a non-arterial street or driveway and railroad where at least one of the streets or driveways is 24 feet or more in width, a visual clearance area shall be a triangle formed by the right-of-way or property lines along such lots and a straight line joining the right of-way or property line at points which are 30 feet distance from the intersection of the right-of way line and measured along such lines. See Figure 18.795.1: 2. Non-arterial streets less than 24 feet in width. At all intersections of two non-arterial streets, a non-arterial street and a driveway, and a non-arterial street or driveway and railroad where both streets and/or driveways are less than 24 feet in width, a visual clearance area shall be a triangle whose base extends 30 feet along the street right-of-way line in both directions from the centerline of the accessway at the front setback line of a single family and two family residence, and 30 feet back from the property line on all other types of uses. Response: The visual clearance areas of(1) the intersection of proposed access drive and SW 72°d Avenue, (2)the intersection of existing central access into the parking lot of Tax Lot 2S113AD- 01700SW 72°d Avenue (proposed to be right-in/right-out), and (3) the intersection of proposed access drive with entrance to 2S113AD-01700 will be designed and constructed to provide visual clearance areas in compliance with this section. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-51 November 25,2003 . K. CONFORMANCE WITH TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.810 (STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS) 18.810.010 Purpose A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers,and drainage. Response: The proposed public and private facilities and utilities have been designed in accordance with this chapter. 18.810.020 General Provisions A. When standards apply. Unless otherwise provided, construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs and other public improvements shall occur in accordance with the standards of this title. No development may occur and no land use application may be approved unless the public facilities related to development comply with the public facility requirements established in this section and adequate public facilities are available. Applicants may be required to dedicate land and build required public improvements only when the required exaction is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. B. Standard specifications. The City Engineer shall establish standard specifications consistent with the application of engineering principles. C. Section 7.40 applies. The provision of Section 7.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply to this chapter. D. Adjustments. Adjustments to the provisions in this chapter related to street improvements may be granted by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.030 C9. (Ord. 99-22) E. Except as provided in Section 18.810.030S, as used in this chapter, the term "streets" shall mean "public streets" unless an adjustment under Section 18.810.020.D is allowed. (Ord. 99-22) Response: The proposed public and private facilities and utilities have been designed in accordance with this chapter. 18.810.030 Streets A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. 2. No development shall occur unless streets within the development meet the standards of this chapter. 3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter, provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development. 4. Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall meet the standards of this chapter; 5. If the City could and would otherwise require the applicant to provide street improvements, the City Engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: a. A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve proper design standards; b. A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-52 November 25,2003 c. Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and the improvement associated with the project under review does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to street safety or capacity; d. The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; e. The improvement is associated with an approved land partition on property zoned residential and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets;or f. Additional planning work is required to define the appropriate design standards for the street and the application is for a project which would contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. 6. The standards of this chapter include the standard specifications adopted by the City Engineer pursuant to Section 18.810.020.B. 7. The approval authority may approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would result in an adverse impact on natural features such as wetlands, steep slopes, or existing mature trees. The approval authority may also approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would have a substantial adverse impact on existing development or would preclude development on the property where the development is proposed. In approving an adjustment to the standards, the approval authority shall balance the benefit of the adjustment with the impact on the public interest represented by the standards. In evaluating the impact on the public interest, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in Section 18.810.030 E.1. An adjustment to the standards may not be granted if the adjustment would risk public safety. Response: The proposed development has frontage and access to a public street. There are no new streets proposed as part of this development application. The design of SW 72m1 Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposed development, will be addressed as part of the overall street design process and will be subject to this standard as part of a separate review. B. Creation of rights-of-way for streets and related purposes. Rights-of-way shall be created through the approval of a final subdivision plat or major partition; however, the Council may approve the creation of a street by acceptance of a deed, provided that such street is deemed essential by the Council for the purpose of general traffic circulation: 1. The Council may approve the creation of a street by deed of dedication without full compliance with the regulations applicable to subdivisions or major partitions if any one or more of the following conditions are found by the Council to be present: a. Establishment of a street is initiated by the Council and is found to be essential for the purpose of general traffic circulation, and partitioning or subdivision of land has an incidental effect rather than being the primary objective in establishing the road or street for public use; or b. The tract in which the road or street is to be dedicated is an isolated ownership of one acre or less and such dedication is recommended by the Commission to the Council based on a finding that the proposal is not an attempt to evade the provisions of this title governing the control of subdivisions or major partitions. 2. With each application for approval of a road or street right-of-way not in full compliance with the regulations applicable to the standards, the proposed dedication shall be made a condition of subdivision and major partition approval: a. The applicant shall submit such additional information and justification as may be necessary to enable the Commission in its review to determine whether or not a recommendation for approval by the Council shall be made; City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review ii-53 November 25,2003 b. The recommendation, if any, shall be based upon a finding that the proposal is not in conflict with the purpose of this title; c. The Commission in submitting the proposal with a recommendation to the Council may attach conditions which are necessary to preserve the standards of this title; and 3. All deeds of dedication shall be in a form prescribed by the City and shall name "the public,"as grantee. Response: There are no new public or private streets proposed as part of this development application. The property owners have agreed to a series of property transfers in order to establish the new parcel configuration and access drive and have agreed to joint use of the proposed new access drive. A portion of the proposed access drive will be in the public right-of- way in order to facilitate maintenance of the signal loops at the intersection with SW 72" Avenue. The design of SW 72w' Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposed development, will be addressed as part of the overall street design process and will be subject to this standard as part of a separate review. C. Creation of access easements. The approval authority may approve an access easement established by deed without full compliance with this title provided such an easement is the only reasonable method by which a lot large enough to develop can be created: 1. Access easements shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code Section 10.207; 2. Access shall be in accordance with Sections 18.705.030.H and 18.705.030I. Response: The property owners have agreed to a series of property transfers in order to establish the new parcel configuration and have agreed to joint use of the proposed new access drive. Legal evidence in the form of easements will establish joint use. Copies of these easements will be placed on permanent file with the City. D. Street location, width and grade. Except as noted below, the location, width and grade of all streets shall conform to an approved street plan and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographic conditions, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets: 1. Street grades shall be approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Subsection M below; and 2. Where the location of a street is not shown in an approved street plan,the arrangement of streets in a development shall either: a. Provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing streets in the surrounding areas,or b. Conform to a plan adopted by the Commission, if it is impractical to conform to existing street patterns because of particular topographical or other existing conditions of the land. Such a plan shall be based on the type of land use to be served, the volume of traffic, the capacity of adjoining streets and the need for public convenience and safety. Response: There are no new public or private streets proposed as part of this development application. As described in the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Bridgeport Village Development [Executive Summary included in Exhibit 6], the placement of the proposed accesses was identified in collaboration with ODOT, Washington County, City of Tualatin, and City of Tigard staff as part of the overall transportation improvement program for the site to ensure optimal traffic operations along SW Bridgeport Road and SW 72" Avenue while still providing access to the City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-54 November 25,2003 existing businesses along the south side of SW Bridgeport Road and along the east side of SW 72" Avenue. In addition,all the road improvements associated with the Bridgeport Village project are being designed to meet Washington County and ODOT design standards. The design plans for this project are distributed to all involved jurisdictions (including the City of Tigard) for their comments. E. Minimum rights-of-way and street widths. Unless otherwise indicated on an approved street plan, or as needed to continue an existing improved street, street right-of-way and roadway widths shall not be less than the minimum width described below. Where a range is indicated, the width shall be determined by the decision-making authority based upon anticipated average daily traffic (ADT) on the new street segment. (The City Council may adopt by resolution, design standards for street construction and other public improvements. The design standards will provide guidance for determining improvement requirements within the specified ranges.) These are presented in Table 18.810.1. 1. The decision-making body shall make its decision about desired right-of-way width and pavement width of the various street types within the subdivision or development after consideration of the following: a. The type of road as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Chapter-Functional Street Classification; b. Anticipated traffic generation; c. On-street parking needs; d. Sidewalk and bikeway requirements; e. Requirements for placement of utilities; f. Street lighting; g. Drainage and slope impacts; h. Street tree location; i. Planting and landscape areas; j. Safety and comfort for motorists, bicyclists,and pedestrians; k. Access needs for emergency vehicles. Response: There are no new public or private streets proposed as part of this development application. All the road improvements associated with the Bridgeport Village project are being designed to meet Washington County and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) right- of-way requirements. The design plans showing the proposed right-of-way are distributed to all involved jurisdictions(including the City of Tigard) for their comments. F. Future street plan and extension of streets. 1. A future street plan shall: a. Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 530 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division. At the applicant's request, the City may prepare a future streets proposal. Costs of the City preparing a future streets proposal shall be reimbursed for the time involved. A street proposal may be modified when subsequent subdivision proposals are submitted. b. Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and pedestrian facilities on or within 530 feet of the site. 2. Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed,and City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-55 November 25,2003 a. These extended streets or street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be culs- de-sac since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. b. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer,the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. c. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub street in excess of 150 feet in length. Response: There are no new public or private streets proposed as part of this development application. The property owners have agreed to a series of property transfers in order to establish the new parcel configuration and have agreed to joint use of the proposed new access d rive. G. Street spacing and access management. Refer to 18.705.030.H. Response: The applicant also is seeking approval of a Type II Access/Egress Adjustment pursuant to Section 18.370.020 C3b in order to retain the existing unsignalized central driveway serving the existing retail uses as a limited right-in/right-out access. H. Street alignment and connections. 1. Full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. 2. All local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is considered precluded when it is not possible to redesign or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15%for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. 3. Proposed street or street extensions shall be located to provide direct access to existing or planned transit stops, commercial services, and other neighborhood facilities, such as schools, shopping areas and parks. 4. All developments should provide an internal network of connecting streets that provide short, direct travel routes and minimize travel distances within the development. Response: There are no new public or private streets proposed as part of this development application. As described in the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Bridgeport Village Development [Executive Summary included in Exhibit 6], the placement of the proposed accesses was identified in collaboration with ODOT, Washington County, City of Tualatin, and City of Tigard staff as part of the overall transportation improvement program for the site to ensure optimal traffic operations along SW Bridgeport Road and SW 72nd Avenue while still providing access to the existing businesses along the south side of SW Bridgeport Road and along the east side of SW 72nd Avenue. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review n-56 November 25,2003 I. Intersection angles. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect at an angle as near to a right angle as practicable, except where topography requires a lesser angle, but in no case shall the angle be less than 75o unless there is special intersection design, and: 1. Streets shall have at least 25 feet of tangent adjacent to the right-of-way intersection unless topography requires a lesser distance; 2. Intersections which are not at right angles shall have a minimum corner radius of 20 feet along the right-of-way lines of the acute angle;and 3. Right-of-way lines at intersection with arterial streets shall have a corner radius of not less than 20 feet. Response: There are no new public or private streets proposed as part of this development application. As described in the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Bridgeport Village Development [Executive Summary included in Exhibit 6J, the placement of the proposed accesses was identified in collaboration with ODOT, Washington County, City of Tualatin, and City of Tigard staff as part of the overall transportation improvement program for the site to ensure optimal traffic operations along SW Bridgeport Road and SW 72"d Avenue while still providing access to the existing businesses along the south side of SW Bridgeport Road and along the east side of SW 72" Avenue. J. Existing rights-of-way. Whenever existing rights-of-way adjacent to or within a tract are of less than standard width, additional rights-of-way shall be provided at the time of subdivision or development. Response: Adequate right-of-way will be dedicated for the portion of the proposed access drive which will be in the public right-of-way in order to facilitate maintenance of the signal loops at the intersection with SW 72"d Avenue. Additional right-of-way dedication for the realignment of SW 72"d Avenue will be addressed as part of the overall street design process and will be subject to this standard as part of a separate review. K. Partial street improvements. Partial street improvements resulting in a pavement width of less than 20 feet; while generally not acceptable, may be approved where essential to reasonable development when in conformity with the other requirements of these regulations, and when it will be practical to require the improvement of the other half when the adjoining property developed. Response: The proposed access drive will be fully improved at the time of development. Additional improvements for the realignment of SW 72nd Avenue will be addressed as part of the overall street design process and will be subject to this standard as part of a separate review. L. Culs-de-sacs. A cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: 1. All culs-de-sac shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer; and 2. The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured from the centerline intersection point of the two streets to the radius point of the bulb. 3. If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-57 November 25,2003 Response: There are no new public or private streets or culs-de-sac proposed as part of this development application; therefore,this standard is not applicable. M. Street names. No street name shall be used which will duplicate or be confused with the names of existing streets in Washington County, except for extensions of existing streets. Street names and numbers shall conform to the established pattern in the surrounding area and as approved by the City Engineer. Response: There are no new public or private streets proposed as part of this development application; therefore,this standard is not applicable. N. Grades and curves. 1. Grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet),and 2. Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. Response: There are no new public or private streets proposed as part of this development application. All the road improvements associated with the Bridgeport Village project are being designed to meet Washington County and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) design standards. The current access driveway layouts have been designed to meet the County standards, which also comply with the criteria outlined above. The topography within the site vicinity is relatively flat and there would be no need for steep grades. The geometry of the accesses will be verified with the City Engineer during the final design stage. 0. Curbs, curb cuts, ramps, and driveway approaches. Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080; and: 1. Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except 2. Where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval; and 3. Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. Response: Curb cuts will be provided in accordance with this chapter and Section 15.04.080 (Driveway Approaches and Curb Cuts) which requires that no driveway approach or access shall be less than six feet from the side property line projected, except in cul-de-sacs, without written permission of the City Engineer; no portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersecting street right-of-way line; commercial or service drives shall not be more than forty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet; and, joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. P. Streets adjacent to railroad right-of-way. Wherever the proposed development contains or is adjacent to a railroad right-of-way, provision shall be made for a street approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a distance suitable for the appropriate use of the land. The distance shall be determined with due consideration at cross streets or the minimum distance required for approach grades and to provide sufficient depth to allow screen planting along the railroad right-of-way in nonindustrial areas. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-58 November 25,2003 Response: There are no adjacent railroad rights-of-way; therefore, this standard is not applicable. Q. Access to arterials and collectors. Where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: 1. A parallel access street along the arterial or collector; 2. Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; 3. Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a nonaccess reservation along the arterial or collector; or 4. Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; 5. If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. Response: The proposed development does not include any residential properties which would require separation from arterials or collectors; therefore,this standard is not applicable. R. Alleys,public or private. 1. Alleys shall be no less than 20 feet in width. In commercial and industrial districts, alleys shall be provided unless other permanent provisions for access to off-street parking and loading facilities are made. 2. While alley intersections and sharp changes in alignment shall be avoided, the corners of necessary alley intersections shall have a radius of not less than 12 feet. Response: The proposed development does not include any public or private alleys; therefore, this standard is not applicable. S. Survey monuments. Upon completion of a street improvement and prior to acceptance by the City, it shall be the responsibility of the developer's registered professional land surveyor to provide certification to the City that all boundary and interior monuments shall be reestablished and protected. Response: The applicant understands that, upon completion of a street improvement and prior to acceptance by the City, it shall be the responsibility of the developer's registered professional land surveyor to provide certification to the City that all boundary and interior monuments shall be reestablished and protected. T. Private streets. 1. Design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer; and 2. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. 3. Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments,mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments. Response: There are no new public or private streets proposed as part of this development application. The placement and layout of the proposed shared access, as well as the maintenance City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-59 November 25,2003 responsibilities were identified in collaboration with Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Washington County, City of Tualatin, and City of Tigard staff as part of the overall transportation improvement. U. Railroad crossings. Where an adjacent development results in a need to install or improve a railroad crossing, the cost for such improvements may be a condition of development approval, or another equitable means of cost distribution shall be determined by the public works Director and approved by the Commission. Response: The proposed development does not include any railroad crossings; therefore, this standard is not applicable. V. Street signs. The City shall install all street signs, relative to traffic control and street names, as specified by the City Engineer for any development. The cost of signs shall be the responsibility of the developer. Response: The applicant understands that the City will install all street signs relative to traffic control and street names as specified by the City Engineer and that the cost of the signs will be the responsibility of the developer. W. Mailboxes. Joint mailbox facilities shall be provided in all residential developments, with each joint mailbox serving at least two dwelling units. 1. Joint mailbox structures shall be placed adjacent to roadway curbs; 2. Proposed locations of joint mailboxes shall be designated on a copy of the preliminary plat or development plan, and shall be approved by the City Engineer/US Post Office prior to final plan approval;and 3. Plans for the joint mailbox structures to be used shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer/US Post Office prior to final approval. Response: The proposed development does not include any residential uses; therefore, this standard is not applicable. X. Traffic signals. The location of traffic signals shall be noted on approved street plans. Where a proposed street intersection will result in an immediate need for a traffic signal, a signal meeting approved specifications shall be installed. The cost shall be included as a condition of development. Response: As described in the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Bridgeport Village Development [Executive Summary included in Exhibit 6], a signalized access on SW 72"_-Avenue is proposed to serve the Bridgeport Village development. The anticipated traffic demand at the access point is expected to warrant signalization upon build-out of Phase I. Accordingly, the analysis has assumed that this access will be signalized. The placement of this access was identified in collaboration with ODOT, Washington County, City of Tualatin, and City of Tigard staff as part of the overall transportation improvement program for the site to ensure optimal traffic operations. Y. Street light standards. Street lights shall be installed in accordance with regulations adopted by the City's direction. Response: Street lights will be installed in accordance the City's direction. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-60 November 25, 2003 Z. Street name signs. Street name signs shall be installed at all street intersections. Stop signs and other signs may be required. Response: The applicant understands that the City will install all street signs relative to traffic control and street names as specified by the City Engineer and that the cost of the signs will be the responsibility of the developer. AA. Street cross-sections. The final lift of asphalt concrete pavement shall be placed on all new constructed public roadways prior to final City acceptance of the roadway and within one year of the conditional acceptance of the roadway unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The final lift shall also be placed no later than when 90% of the structures in the new development are completed or three years from the commencement of initial construction of the development,whichever is less. 1. Sub-base and leveling course shall be of select crushed rock; 2. Surface material shall be of Class C or B asphaltic concrete; 3. The final lift shall be placed on all new construction roadways prior to City final acceptance of the roadway; however, not before 90% of the structures in the new development are completed unless three years have elapsed since initiation of construction in the development; 4. The final lift shall be Class C asphaltic concrete as defined by A.P.W.A. standard specifications; and 5. No lift shall be less than 1-1/2 inches in thickness. (Ord.99-22) Response: There are no new public or private streets proposed as part of this development application. However,where applicable,all new construction will follow the guidelines outlined by the jurisdictions. AB. Traffic calming. When, in the opinion of the City Engineer, the proposed development will create a negative traffic condition on existing neighborhood streets, such as excessive speeding, the developer may be required to provide traffic calming measures. These measures may be required within the development and/or offsite as deemed appropriate. As an alternative,the developer may be required to deposit funds with the City to help pay for traffic calming measures that become necessary once the development is occupied and the City Engineer determines that the additional traffic from the development has triggered the need for traffic calming measures. The City Engineer will determine the amount of funds required, and will collect said funds from the developer prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or in the case of subdivision, prior to the approval of the final plat. The funds will be held by the City for a period of five (5)years from the date of issuance of certificate of occupancy, or in the case of a subdivision,the date of final plat approval. Any funds not used by the City within the five-year time period will be refunded to the developer. Response: There are no adjacent neighborhood streets which could be negatively impacted by the proposed development; therefore, this standard is not applicable. In addition, SW 72"d Avenue is classified as an arterial according to the Washington County Transportation System Plan (TSP). An arterial is typically designed to meet a design speed of 45 miles per hour. The current design for the road improvements along SW 72' Avenue conforms to a design speed of 35 miles per hour. The County has approved this design speed modification. Therefore, the speeds along SW 72"d Avenue would be less than usually expected along arterial roadways. AC. Traffic study. 1. A traffic study shall be required for all new or expanded uses or developments under any of the following circumstances: City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-61 November 25,2003 a. when they generate a 10%or greater increase in existing traffic to high collision intersections identified by Washington County. b. Trip generations from development onto the City street at the point of access and the existing ADT fall within the following ranges: c. If any of the following issues become evident to the City engineer: (1) High traffic volumes on the adjacent roadway that may affect movement into or out of the site (2) Lack of existing left-turn lanes onto the adjacent roadway at the proposed access drive(s) (3) Inadequate horizontal or vertical sight distance at access points (4) The proximity of the proposed access to other existing drives or intersections is a potential hazard (5) The proposal requires a conditional use permit or involves a drive-through operation (6) The proposed development may result in excessive traffic volumes on adjacent local streets. 2. In addition, a traffic study may be required for all new or expanded uses or developments under any of the following circumstances: a. when the site is within 500 feet of an ODOT facility and/or b. trip generation from a development adds 300 or more vehicle trips per day to an ODOT facility and/or c. trip generation from a development adds 50 or more peak hour trips to an ODOT facility. (Ord. 02-33) Response: Exhibit 6 includes the Executive Summary of a Traffic Impact Analysis, which evaluated traffic impacts for the entire Bridgeport Village development area, including the proposed signalized access point on SW 72nd Avenue which will serve the new Village Inn restaurant, the North TriMet Park & Ride and the Borders Bookstore. The anticipated traffic volumes at this access point are anticipated to warrant signalization. Accordingly, the analysis has assumed that the access will be signalized. The placement of this access was identified in collaboration with ODOT, Washington County, City of Tualatin, and City of Tigard staff as part of the overall transportation improvement program for the site to ensure optimal traffic operations along SW Bridgeport Road and SW 72nd Avenue while still providing access to the existing businesses along the south side of SW Bridgeport Road and along the east side of SW 72nd Avenue. 18.810.040 Blocks A. Block design. The length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. B. Sizes. 1. The perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the centerline of the streets except: a. Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water, or pre-existing development; or b. For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, collectors or railroads. c. For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. 2. Bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is exempted by B.1 above. Spacing between connections shall be no more City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-62 November 25,2003 than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. (Ord. 02-33) Response: No new blocks will be created as a part of the proposed development; therefore, this standard is not applicable. 18.810.050 Easements A. Easements. Easements for sewers, drainage, water mains, electric lines or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a development traversed by a watercourse, or drainageway, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of- way conforming substantially with the lines of the watercourse. B. Utility easements. A property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements with the City, the applicable district and each utility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the development. The City's standard width for public main line utility easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district,or City Engineer. Response: Easements for sewers, drainage,water mains, electric lines or other public utilities will be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions in accordance with this requirement. 18.810.060 Lots A. Size and shape. Lot size, width, shape and orientation shall be appropriate for the location of the development and for the type of use contemplated,and: 1. No lot shall contain part of an existing or proposed public right-of-way within its dimensions; 2. The depth of all lots shall not exceed 2-1/2 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1-1/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district; 3. Depth and width of properties zoned for commercial and industrial purposes shall be adequate to provide for the off-street parking and service facilities required by the type of use proposed. B. Lot frontage. Each lot shall abut upon a public or private street, other than an alley, for a width of at least 25 feet unless the lot is created through a minor land partition in which case Subsection 18.162.050 (C) applies, or unless the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, in which case the lot frontage shall be at least 15 feet. C. Through lots. Through lots shall be avoided except where they are essential to provide separation of residential development from major traffic arterials or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation,and: 1. A planting buffer at least ten feet wide is required abutting the arterial rights-of-way; and 2. All through lots shall provide the required front yard setback on each street. D. Lot side lines. The side lines of lots, as far as practicable, shall be at right angles to the street upon which the lots front. E. Large lots. In dividing tracts into large lots or parcels which at some future time are likely to be redivided, the Commission may require that the lots be of such size and shape, and be so divided into building sites, and contain such site restrictions as will provide for the extension and opening of streets at intervals which will permit a subsequent division of any tract into lots or parcels of smaller size. The land division shall be denied if the proposed large development lot does not provide for the future division of the lots and future extension of public facilities. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-63 November 25,2003 Response: The property owners have agreed to a series of property transfers in order to establish the new parcel configuration. No new lots are proposed to be created in the City of Tigard as part of this application. 18.810.070 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks. All industrial streets and private streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along at least one side of the street. All other streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if an adjoining street has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development,even if no sidewalk exists on the other side of the street B. Requirement of developers 1. As part of any development proposal, or change in use resulting in an additional 1,000 vehicle trips or more per day, an applicant shall be required to identify direct, safe (1.25 x the straight line distance) pedestrian routes within 1/2 mile of their site to all transit facilities and Neighborhood Activity Centers(schools, parks, libraries, etc.). In addition,the developer may be required to participate in the removal of any gaps in the pedestrian system off-site if justified by the development. 2. If there is an existing sidewalk, on the same side of the street as the development, within 300 feet of a development site in either direction, the sidewalk shall be extended from the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality (even if the sidewalk does not serve a neighborhood activity center). C. Planter strip requirements. A planter strip separation of at least five feet between the curb and the sidewalk shall be required in the design of streets, except where the following conditions exist: there is inadequate right-of-way; the curbside sidewalks already exist on predominant portions of the street; it would conflict with the utilities, there are significant natural features (large trees, water features, etc) that would be destroyed if the sidewalk were located as required, or where there are existing structures in close proximity to the street (15 feet or less)Additional consideration for exempting the planter strip requirement may be given on a case by case basis if a property abuts more than one street frontage. D. Sidewalks in central business district. In the central business district, sidewalks shall be 10 feet in width,and: 1. All sidewalks shall provide a continuous unobstructed path;and 2. The width of curbside sidewalks shall be measured from the back of the curb. E. Maintenance. Maintenance of sidewalks, curbs, and planter strips is the continuing obligation of the adjacent property owner. F. Application for permit and inspection. If the construction of a sidewalk is not included in a performance bond of an approved subdivision or the performance bond has lapsed, then every person, firm or corporation desiring to construct sidewalks as provided by this chapter, shall, before entering upon the work or improvement, apply for a street opening permit to the Engineering department to so build or construct: 1. An occupancy permit shall not be issued for a development until the provisions of this section are satisfied. 2. The City Engineer may issue a permit and certificate allowing temporary noncompliance with the provisions of this section to the owner, builder or contractor when, in his opinion, the construction of the sidewalk is impractical for one or more of the following reasons: a. Sidewalk grades have not and cannot be established for the property in question within a reasonable length of time; b. Forthcoming installation of public utilities or street paving would be likely to cause severe damage to the new sidewalk; City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-64 November 25,2003 c. Street right-of-way is insufficient to accommodate a sidewalk on one or both sides of the street;or d. Topography or elevation of the sidewalk base area makes construction of a sidewalk impractical or economically infeasible; and 3. The City Engineer shall inspect the construction of sidewalks for compliance with the provision set forth in the standard specifications manual. G. Council initiation of construction. In the event one or more of the following situations are found by the Council to exist, the Council may adopt a resolution to initiate construction of a sidewalk in accordance with City ordinances: 1. A safety hazard exists for children walking to or from school and sidewalks are necessary to eliminate the hazard; 2. A safety hazard exists for pedestrians walking to or from a public building, commercial area, place of assembly or other general pedestrian traffic,and sidewalks are necessary to eliminate the hazard; 3. 50% or more of the area in a given block has been improved by the construction of dwellings, multiple dwellings,commercial buildings or public buildings and/or parks;and 4. A criteria which allowed noncompliance under Section E.1.b above no longer exists and a sidewalk could be constructed in conformance with City standards.(Ord. 02-33, Ord. 99-22) Response: There are no new public or private streets proposed as part of this development application. The design of SW 72od Avenue,which is adjacent to the proposed development,will be addressed as part of the overall street design process and will be subject to this standard as part of a separate review. In summary, sidewalks are provided along both sides of SW 72°d Avenue. The new shared access will have sidewalks along both sides of the access driveway up to the TriMet facility. In addition, the existing sidewalk along the south side of the proposed right-in/right-out will be maintained. 18.810.080 Public Use Areas A. Dedication requirements. 1. Where a proposed park, playground or other public use shown in a development plan adopted by the City is located in whole or in part in a subdivision, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of such area within the subdivision, provided that the reservation or dedication is roughly proportional to the impact of the subdivision on the park system. 2. Where considered desirable by the Commission in accordance with adopted comprehensive plan policies, and where a development plan of the City does not indicate proposed public use areas, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of areas within the subdivision or sites of a character, extent and location suitable for the development of parks or other public use, provided that the reservation or dedication is roughly proportional to the impact of the subdivision on the park system. B. Acquisition by public agency. If the developer is required to reserve land area for a park,playground, or other public use, such land shall be acquired by the appropriate public agency within 18 months following plat approval, at a price agreed upon prior to approval of the plat, or such reservation shall be released to the subdivider. (Ord. 99-22) Response: There are no public use areas identified within the development area; therefore, this section is not applicable. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-65 November 25,2003 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers A. Sewers required. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. B. Sewer plan approval. The City Engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to issuance of development permits involving sewer service. C. Over-sizing. Proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive.Plan. D. Permits denied. Development permits may be restricted by the Commission or Hearings Officer where a deficiency exists in the existing sewer system or portion thereof which cannot be rectified within the development and which if not rectified will result in a threat to public health or safety, surcharging of existing mains, or violations of state or federal standards pertaining to operation of the sewage treatment system. Response: As shown on Exhibit 4. Sheet 4B [Proposed Utilities and Storm Drainage Plan], sanitary sewer will be installed to serve the proposed new Village Inn restaurant which is located in the City of Tualatin. No change is proposed to the existing sanitary sewer service to Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700(existing retail). 18.810.100 Storm Drainage A. General provisions. The Director and City Engineer shall issue a development permit only where adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff have been made,and: 1. The storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary sewerage system; 2. Where possible, inlets shall be provided so surface water is not carried across any intersection or allowed to flood any street; and 3. Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown on every development proposal plan. B. Easements. Where a development is traversed by a watercourse, drainageway, channel or stream, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of such watercourse and such further width as will be adequate for conveyance and maintenance. C. Accommodation of upstream drainage. A culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development,and: 1. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). D. Effect on downstream drainage. Where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). Response: As shown on Exhibit 4. Sheet 4B [Proposed Utilities and Storm Drainage Plan], storm drainage will be installed to serve the proposed new Village Inn restaurant and parking area City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-66 November 25,2003 and the proposed new access drive. No other changes are proposed to the existing storm drainage service to Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700(existing retail). 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1. As a standard, bike lanes shall be required along all Arterial and Collector routes and where identified on the City's adopted bicycle plan in the Transportation System Plan(TSP). 2. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or rights-of-way, provided such dedication is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. 3. Any new street improvement project shall include bicycle lanes as required in this document and on the adopted bicycle plan. B. Cost of construction. Development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements in an amount roughly proportional to the impact of the development. C. Minimum width. 1. Minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. 2. Minimum width multi-use paths separated from the road is ten (10) feet. The width may be reduced to eight(8)feet if there are environmental or other constraints. 3. The minimum width for pedestrian only off-street paths is five(5)feet. 4. Design standards for bike and pedestrian-ways shall be determined by the City Engineer. (Ord. 02-33, Ord.99-22) Response: SW 72w' Avenue is an Arterial route. The design of SW 72" Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposed development,will be addressed as part of the overall street design process and will be subject to this standard as part of a separate review. 18.810.120 Utilities A. Underground utilities. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: 1. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; 2. The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; 3. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets;and 4. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. B. Information on development plans. The applicant for a development shall show on the development plan or in the explanatory information,easements for all underground utility facilities, and: 1. Plans showing the location of all underground facilities as described herein shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval; and 2. Care shall be taken in all cases to ensure that above ground equipment does not obstruct vision clearance areas for vehicular traffic. C. Exception to under-grounding requirement. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-67 November 25,2003 1. The developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of undergrounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which undergrounding would result in the placement of additional poles,rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. 2. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 3. Properties within the CBD zoning district shall be exempt from the requirements for undergrounding of utility lines and from the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 4. The exceptions in Subsections 1 through 3 of this section shall apply only to existing utility lines. All new utility lines shall be placed underground. D. Fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 1. The City Engineer shall establish utility service areas in the City. All development which occurs within a utility service area shall pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding for utilities if the development does not provide underground utilities,unless exempted by this code. 2. The City Engineer shall establish the fee by utility service area which shall be determined based upon the estimated cost to underground utilities within each service area. The total estimated cost for undergrounding in a service area shall be allocated on a front-foot basis to each party within the service area. The fee due from any developer shall be calculated based on a front-foot basis. 3. A developer shall receive a credit against the fee for costs incurred in the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities. The City Engineer shall determine the amount of the credit, after review of cost information submitted by the applicant with the request for credit. 4. The funds collected in each service area shall be used for undergrounding utilities within the City at large. The City Engineer shall prepare and maintain a list of proposed undergrounding projects which may be funded with the fees collected by the City. The list shall indicate the estimated timing and cost of each project. The list shall be submitted to the City Council for their review and approval annually. Response: The applicant is proposing to install utility lines underground to serve the proposed new Village Inn restaurant and Village Inn parking area and the proposed new access drive. Existing utility lines adjacent to Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 (existing retail) will be placed underground for approximately 330 feet of the frontage along SW 72" Avenue. The applicant understands that there may be a requirement to pay a fee in lieu of undergrounding utilities along the remaining frontage. 18.810.130 Cash or Bond Required A. Guarantee. All improvements installed by the developer shall be guaranteed as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following acceptance by the City Council. B. Cash deposit or bond. Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City Engineer. C. Compliance requirements. The cash or bond shall comply with the terms and conditions of Section 18.430.090. Response: The applicant understands that all improvements installed by the developer shall be guaranteed as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following acceptance by the City Council. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-68 November 25,2003 18.810.140 Monuments A. Replacement required. Any monuments that are disturbed before all improvements are completed by the subdivider shall be replaced prior to final acceptance of the improvements. Response: The proposed application does not include a subdivision; however, the applicant understands that any monuments that are disturbed before all improvements are completed by the developer shall be replaced prior to final acceptance of the improvements. 18.810.150 Installation Prerequisite A. Approval required. No public improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans have been approved by the City,permit fee paid, and permit issued. B. Permit fee. The permit fee is required to defray the cost and expenses incurred by the City for construction and other services in connection with the improvement. The permit fee shall be set by Council resolution. Response: The applicant understands that no public improvements,including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans have been approved by the City,permit fee paid,and permit issued. 18.810.160 Installation Conformation A. Conformance required. In addition to other requirements, improvements installed by the developer either as a requirement of these regulations or at his own option, shall conform to the requirements of this chapter and to improvement standards and specifications followed by the City. B. Adopted installation standards. The Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Oregon Chapter A.P.W.A., and Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) shall be a part of the City's adopted installation standard(s); other standards may also be required upon recommendation of the City Engineer. Response: The applicant understands that improvements installed by the developer either as a requirement of these regulations or at his own option, shall conform to the requirements of this chapter and to improvement standards and specifications followed by the City. 18.810.170 Plan Check A. Submittal requirements. Work shall not begin until construction plans and construction estimates have been submitted and checked for adequacy and approved by the City Engineer in writing. The developer can obtain detailed information about submittal requirements from the City Engineer. B. Compliance. All such plans shall be prepared in accordance with requirements of the City. Response: The applicant understands that work shall not begin until construction plans and construction estimates have been submitted and checked for adequacy and approved by the City Engineer in writing. 18.810.180 Notice to City A. Commencement. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. B. Resumption. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-69 November 25,2003 Response: The applicant understands that work may not begin,or be resumed if discontinued, until after the City has been notified. 18.810.190 City Inspection A. Inspection of improvements. Improvements shall be constructed under the inspection and to the satisfaction of the City. The City may require changes in typical sections and details if unusual conditions arising during construction warrant such changes in the public interest. Response: The applicant understands that improvements must be constructed under the inspection and to the satisfaction of the City and that the City may require changes in typical sections and details if unusual conditions arising during construction warrant such changes in the public interest. 18.810.200 Engineer's Certification A. Written certification required. The developer's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior to City acceptance of the subdivision's improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. Response: The developer's engineers will provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices,and are of high grade, prior to City acceptance of the subdivision's improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. Each engineer (civil, traffic, geotechnical, etc.) will provide certification of the work conducted by each engineer(standard practice). 18.810.210 Completion Requirements(To be completed.) Response: Not applicable. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review II-70 November 25,2003 5 ecl ' o ✓1 IE . I.1,‘blf 1. . 7,- ACCESS MODIFICATION AND APPLICANT/DEVELOPER VILLAGE INN PARKING 01. OPUST11 BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE,L.L.C. 1000 S.W.BROADWAY, SUITE 1130 PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 SECTION 13, T. 2S, R. 1W CONTACT: MIKE NICHOLS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION SURVEYOR/ENGINEER PREPARED FOR: L LDC DESIGN GROUP,INC. CITY OF TIGARD OREGON 3300 N.W.211TH TERRACE HILLSBORO,OREGON 97124 (503)858-4242 NOVEMBER 2003 DESIGN GROUP, INC. CONTACT: FRED HOLZ,P.E. . ... !(l , l Nl7,; C f , TRAFFIC CONSULTANT IC . -,4w.:... . ,Ff°KITIELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. 4-"Sr-,04i74133ftwa 610 S.W.ALDER,SUITE 700 , . PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 •°: • , ., KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. (503)228-5230 �~ � '� - TRANSPORTATION PIANNINGITRAFFIG ENGINEERING CONTACT:MARK VANDEHEY,P.E. � ��,, ♦ j 7=- EXHIBITS ARCHITECT _ -., I. r- IA COVER SHEET ARCHITECTS VAN LOM&COMPANY . • '" 1B AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ARCHITECTS VAN LOMEICOMPANY 34 N.W.1ST AVENUE,SUITE 309 • �r- 2 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PORTLAND,OREGON 97209 - --,.:...z,' �' 3A GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN CONTACT:JOSEPH VAN LOM,A.I.A. 3B TREE REMOVAL,PRESERVATION AND M MITIGATION PLAN 3C MEMORANDUM FROM CERTIFIED ARBORIST PLANNING 4A EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP `� • .47,-►�_ ; • 4B PROPOSED UTILITIES AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN ANGELO EATON&ASSOCIATES Durham w "iiilhW ANGELO<' EATON 620 SW MAIN STREET,SUITE 201 X019 I�' !"t �i� �� 4C PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT/PROPOSED STREEET PLAN g PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 �pSV ''� ,� � 40�� 5A LANDSCAPE PLAN N •A°°G G i a t°° (503)227-3673 -j e g'� • • 3 S I T El 5B LANDSCAPE PLAN DETAIL CONTACT: CATHY CORLISS °"° 3 i•R - 3 y � ■ �� r ••I.II0. ..i. : 1Q i �:II�ii!t AEI. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ��.•`T'o�%►�i � �} ■■ J ,��_�j • ♦O.�iuuz 1� CHRISTOPHER FRESHLEY CHRISTOPHER FRESHLEY =g �� Aw/�� '�/�;-���� LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1020 SW D,ORE OREGON 0 355 oe..�►•�_ _'::44 ,., At,f in;41...L. PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 dAIIIIII\.iiuin, P�• '•�` ` e:ni..111.�.• r•:n s (503)222-9881 Pl 3� e * . i 1�1 2 ♦_ _-- i y1 a �.Ihmun dl n. CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER FRESHLEY �.� ...[�, $`, , ti �:a�O°■:■p I. -.11'CM , ,. i ,,iii A iii.11�....... ARBORIST y�ilta. , . it 11j - I••• "u 111111�.� .I x,1..1 01.�..III.ii1.■■■ ■■..WALTER H.KNAPP,SILVICULTURE& � fit•;i �'�`+::':••'■:ji ■.y>_ I�� .tine :::i ��URBAN FORESTRY f 1 cj ,_._._._... j CH1��.nuni.,■1�•� Rid 7615 SW DUNSMUIR (PI S ` /J �.w SAD sr: . .....:z.L.: X11 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97007 (503)NTACT: WALTER H.KNAPP VICINITY MAP • CO i SCALE: 1"=900' 1 6 0 1A r ZiA511.4: I • V — , . • iir •••-•F „ . .. - . , i 1 i f t 4 r I (�. - t t a ' it _ f { ► fry r t S • O. +..�!!'-1: •• - ` '- f , rte^ Li' -1 / F w .' t '11:„....__Ft've,t . ! . r 1. °-i F i7. Ir . Vi7W p- �V:i y; r r "i / p • �f ![�/ ► 1�. . e .r. ..., -- 1 t ��4. /u�j. _ , err' IT f w �» ' i��..+ �• t, , • . - _ r• �...a...w-...... ..mow. 1 .,,..i,, , dl:tlt. 1{1 ..`1 i -� - .T Pt" _ ,,v. , ' . t .. - 111�J •, .t 1a... �!�` �, 1 ( M• + S*, it ' �..• 1 w .� r _ .... . . ..1 t 0,/ r- r fi 1 9 1 , Access .. r°,r. ■D •' I r M O■■ FIN+•'ME 4;' i � ,. /. / -''' f 3;It EL or - L Y xr{ 17;f . '''''. 11;11111;ii ' x- f• 'R ► + . , s s '':: li 1 • 4 p 1113 14 a. t: Illirk b!IlIl. / A* ! t 7,, i Vatii?„..' . - M �r -is S.W. ,,ay:; .. w��', ..::n:.-1i•• l - .-- 3 .1 . . + „ , .41poitift. :., 'Y #..,...- ,. 1 \ `;x tit -'q" ,R' . _ .. t •► i , _ . . 1 s max_ , b ! `.i. . It. }„ i 1 � i IV' ' t t Site Boundary "' .• .' 1- ii t 1+" `1 +- ... _ 1 i i' 1� i ■ ■ City Limits /• 11 ! Area Within o ' 1 . + « .1 r - .'' ? City of Tigard 1k _ .. .,;F. # rte- ,"y" i �? 2 /.• 4 / �! ► 1 ! - Existing Property Boundary:lf F _ t•F;• `�► �✓ r,;�. , Proposed Property Boundary if, Q qt. I/ �_. ,+ ~4 741, F Existing Lot Line g . . .--.''.. '' - . ,. LI, ; '.. Q w '4. `�!a - r"IF A >! `^ l' ' 1 ~ :mo w r • `• • r 0 •\ i (IP • ajl , / i _s f• \ �I� • . i •••• 1 and. 100 R PREPARED BY: g + Y ' t `.I' r.. ii 1 \ t. LDC Ititt .' f . /�: t. ` f r Design Group,Inc ^ # I: !'1 V'� d� `\ ,+• • \' • I' \ 4,' , .? ''� `� Planners !"t r.tolr ,� +� ARCHITECTS VAN LOMEl COMPANY Engineers Surveyors 1 VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT 0N•2I1TM `E I HIlLSBdi4 OBEOON 9712{ PINE 5038584242 1 fPa 50]6435500 E SITE PLAN .." 3'3 34 NW First Avenue,Suite 309 10/20/03 1 Portland,OR 97209 O A ACHII�CTS VAN LOM+COMPANY TIGARD, OREGON 503.226.0590 1B J r EXISTING NORTHERN e -x k: ,, �ww ACCESS ,+ 7Trrrnl-G - J.. .. J f? V C' 1 I 1 rl 111 �. -- - ' f f 1�I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 -J >4 — t I f F I I I) I I I I I 1 M II i f l i l i I I f 1 1 1 i l i l l l 1 1 1 1 1 I G B/l,L l 7 t I i � I ! 1 1 7 1 eenl u eErow _ :as.000.yr.let :_ A l l l l ! I 61 1 I 1 1 11 -I f 1 I I I 7 ) 1 1_I -�,yj I I l 7 1 i i - -- 77 1 3 1 1 1 1 I i i 1 1 ' _I- r:r l BORDERS BOOKS/BED,BATH AND BEYOND L 1700'111111 bD C illt 1700)EXISTING CENTRAL ... • fd- r-' , ACCESS � PROPOSED Ti;' H••HI EXISTING LOT AREA = 309,967 sq.ft. 'RIGHT-IN MKT OU" i x;,.. -"-------- rlrlrlTl ` �° ss I , , , , I i ; 1 i �� l EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA = 68,539 sq.ft.(22%-LANDSCAPE COVERAGE) ' ref, a wD L - ,, ' - - I t " I 1 = : :�0-* f LANDSCAPE AREAS REMOVED = 1,970 sq.ft. - ° C i - REMAINING LANDSCAPE AREA 66,569 sq.ft.(21%-LANDSCAPE COVERAGE) EXISTING i-- _J BORDERS oa music BUILDING mD UFE \■\if,,, EXISTING _ -'I-- -J \ --a-i- PROPERTY LINE , -J__ _-4 '2°°°°'°" - .�v°. EXISTING BUILDING AREA = ±71,000 _7 ' - 1 ". EXISTING NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES = 349 - -EXISTING_ PROPOSED 1 -0MKING-•-1 RIGHT-OF-WAY/ f : --I- _ ; �`� REMAINING NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS = 347-APPROX.5 SPACES/1,000 sq.ft. PROPERTY LINE = _. � _ f` APPROXIMATE AREA TO BE VACATED AND = 3,677 sq ft. PROPOSED E - - "r '"� ADDED TO TAX LOT 1700 1 ' -1-- 1 1-1 1 1 1 f'. 1 1 I-1 • s SOUTHERN ACCESS = - 1-- / III I 1 THROUGH OD.O.T. ' '� f / PROPOERTY(TRI-MET) - (2)SPACES TO BE VILLAGE INN / / REMOVED 4 r + ' TOTAL AREA WITH TIGARD CITY /y' tr* rr ;�� ,F ., ' / =2,191 sq.ft. _ w,C~� ,�/� I� ��.��.'� � �: . ::•:•: LIMITS q• �` a,,co.-mop/ ,' h ( c ., / r arr i�wwn4 i�ii�iig�/rii/ii NEW LANDSCAPING WITHIN TIGARD CITY ° �� ` f. 7 �7 ��•' .1 j w lfl.idit LIMITS =837 sq.ft.(38/o LANDSCAPE COVERAGE) \� .3. �• ;ti; ��� ///1.-, s.,i �.-i Q NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES WITHIN TIGARD ( sq.ft.) gi `�; ��� ;�\ �r� / CITY LIMITS =6 753 s .ft. ".1 \/� EXISTING , i) / ,N.1,,\ PARKING', ,) i /.._= e N ;VNnA s, /y, `/; 11 / I::.:::.: .. •. PROPOSED NEW LANDSCAPING = 3,298 sq.ft. / ' • 4 Y:l.PROPOSED . / rs '�- l 1 S5 4 -�, -e in 1 3• ,r pOg� goA I 1 Inch = eo a I 1> S Y4. ■ Rlp�Ff PREPARED BY: LDC a Design Group,Inc 3 / Planners P ARCHITECTS VAN LOM©COMPANY Engineers a VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT Surveyors 3700 R.W. TERRACE HI .CREC I PHONE 507.43S.4242 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN :w, a� 34 NW First Avenue,Suite 309 10/20/03 Y AO P R RIGHN, B TIGARD OREGON Portland,OR 97209 ARCHITECTS S VAN LOM+COMPANY 503.226.0590 _ L 2 J • r &le-,1* 10) 3 . 1 „..____. _.__....._._____..7 i i :, - / + i i I; +jiiiii7+f-fi+ 1 i/ I I I C► -- tm SAW NO MEW .i• i j J +I ��JJ /, I U i / ` 1 r I , 1 -.,' --T+TI /' i f + i. II i 7 �> ��yN/ I - `y \y; NOTF: — rw>Tmc BU1twG i ,�/ ADJUST EXISTING VALVE BOXES & COVERS, UTILITY ji snwDa IATI uv Arm cur _ ry RISERS, ETC., TO GRADE AS NECESSARY. REMOVE EXISTING•- \ i I ATBS.�,n —I'-- ' J •',/ PAVEMENT AND CURB AS NECESSARY. REMOVE AND/OR I � )^ _'-'•.-'`' j � u7 e \ ' RELOCATE EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES AS NECESSARY. - - ICI- n N,; I \4; ,....4 r. t� ; ~i – 4,,iii Ex49 9...ED. 164.Y . I I i 1 ; r L' ,\: :PALM T , ,A3- ONSTRUC AVEL 1 I CONi%; QN.ENTRAN 1 I i ' PER DETAIL,(�N SHT. 2 `1 PROP'S ED'BRIDGEPORT VGE... -. �� 1 �I' 18548 - - _ NTURE DE`�ELOPMENT � I < 1 is 80 �' �~�`• (E OS TING DURHAM GU ARM) A 0 j }3{�I +f' CRY OF TIGARD �O E ^,ri i 41 `1.4 ze,„1! N. CURB.*./WEND II.--_-_ , NOTE: CMYOFTUALp 1`1't�0 �O'�Jp .... �. , 166O±) _ SEE SEPARATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR y1• p2 °�:p: X4.5• f•' �/ , s �a \j'46—* ""' "4+ SW BRIDGEPORT ROAD AND SW 72ND AVENUE. ':,` �•9B4. 2 1-5.49' ! � / f, O■ —.._ ^.``,4 / / �. ,� ? "� / NOTE: ____ -N'•, j I tit;�I' �� ` ALL SITE PREPARATION GRADING FOR BUILDINGS, " ,i RETAINING WALLS, UTILITIES AND PAVEMENTS r~~ , REPORT DATED MARCH ACCORDANCE 1 003 PROJECT CNO. TL 4924, •/ —`_ *' BY TERRA ASSOCIATES, INC. ✓ By I \ - \ '-' .*:.: , j I LLAGE INN d +G _ '"' �'. .RESTAURANT?4 f / L = - T/ s : I \\ '.'*Ve‘;'<"'"114,0091,..-.-"'''' ... '(P ,A ' GEPORj RE) i j!; f'fi%'~� BROSEO fU�- ∎∎.��. PREPARED ii)/ (LDC_ ,.,' Planners x ARCHITECTS VAN LOMICOMPANY Engineers ic VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT Surveyors 3300 N.W.211114 TERRACE HILLSBORO.OREGON 97124 B PHONE 503 6%4242 . GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN y 34 NW First Avenue,Suite 309 11/21/03 2 • TIGARD, OREGON Portland,OR 97209 ARCHITECTS VAN LOM+COMPANY 501226.0590 AIA,PC 3A L J r W I ,.7,...,„ LEGEND I 1 O I r f • EJOSTING CONIFEROUS TREE I I I I 0 U tl l I , _ ?I a EmmS1MC DECIDUOUS TREE I i C G I---� (900) I (1 000) (1100) (103) F E ' 3 t'` ;. II -;;., _ yyBIM� Wig ODNIFEPOUS W A v, t .' 7�E TREE TO BE REMOYEO Nis STING NOCUOUS � 1 I I ray J e EXISTING STREET TREE IiU. _ .. TO BE FROM(LOCATED FRaT AIR PNOro> I EIOSTNG iREE 1111E i I ' y ..". ., t. (COCATEO FROM AW PHOTO) C PROTECTECBVE FENCING FOR TREES lij _ _ _ S.W. FNMA STREET_ 1 \ ,. (7 50°) 1(1600) ,`; —._ -7__— -. – ---- – --_..11111 .'R ... - e9� NOTES: 7 ,1: I --' : - f ¢. 1.PROTECTIVE FENCING FOR TREES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE ' ;�-7�Q,:: DRIPLINE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A CERTIFIED ARBORIST. II • I I '. 7 . -b I 2.EVERY TREE THAT IS REMOVED SHALL BE REPLACED IN ' ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY OF TIGARD'S TREE MITIGATION I STANDARDS AND UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A CERTIFIED 1 , F_ �-0 � _J a ARBORIST. 1 .. � 1 (1p0) , -; aTY of ncARO /,��'� � ' '� .trpr3F7GALAT}T --- --_ ° \dI _ �i�F'` t~ T�" �AR2 /•4 ..1,.4,,N r� r r. v �•ITY OF TUALATIN /v I i 0...t•.- WM ''. 4011 . (200) t_'' ` i i : i ‘‘\..1 ,,,,,,. !w I:V * ; w,,/ ``1 , MME ,_� — 0 01 hir I I Leg/ (ago) i Q.1 /' //� w 3'J i I i i 1 �� VILLAGE INN R1 c, !(590) / ,./ /j-/ SITE f Di I 1 // 1209) I /� ' I REMOVE E10S11NG TREES i !/ EXACT LOCATION TO BE OETEMRIED I / \ �( AT OWE a FINAL DESIGN OFV2F'F-SITE 1 1 7 i,\ \ IMPROVEMENTS O. II I •�i�/ �s� (1700) t 1. J7 //j F , i ' ' (707) �Fpy m 1 i� / \ I into Loo a 3 ��j (600) \ PREPARED BY: s 'krt. l "' ' �I a -\ \ \ (L,DC, a i , 7 s (500) \ Design Group Inc %2' Planners �/ \ \ ARCHITECTS VAN LOMOCOMPANY Engineers r'—� VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT 1 (609) \ NONE 50U51..242 CL B Surveyors OREGON 9Ti•2+ •a FFAE 503.45.can TREE REMOVAL, PRESERVATION AND MITIGATION PLAN 19,20,93 a 34 NW First Avenue,Suite 309 ©COPYRIGHT 2 TIGARD, OREGON Portland,OR 97209 ARCHITECTS VAN LOM• COMPANY 503.226.0590 • 3B L J f 1 \ 75, EXISTING R/W TO 1(i S s f REMAIN UNCHANGED 1"=100' 0 ^ ■ f — __ — ��� - _ TO PUBLIC PER DOC. �I ,` NO. 85005505 T- 4',0 Il 30' 1 I I I 30' ►� 1 EXISTING R/W TO I I I I I REMAIN UNCHANGED I � 1 ,,, I 45' I EXISTING R/W TO 1 1 REMAIN UNCHANGED 1 51' -- I 96' I ODOT LAND PER (931-497) 1 — — __ _ _ ,I Q .v CITY RELINQUISHED 1 PER DOC. NO. LIMITS OF NEW i EN 84034659 1 RIGHT OF WAY TO BE DEDICATED 1 1 1 I I 1 I I (ri , 1 1 I 1 i . I 1 I I PORTION OF � � ,�o \ JEAN ROAD TO / BE VACATED AMI6' JEAN ROAD - - ti / - ' i ,, - I / AREA TO BE /2 7 %, 1 / // VACATED AI Mk OPUS NORTHWEST P�unz LDC Eng;nee>s s CITY OF TIGARD RIGHT OF WAY SKETCH 2751 1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1130 Surveyors IN NE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 13, PORTLAND, OR 97205 Design GrouµInc T. 2S., R. 1W., W.M. .,..e (503)916-8963 MOO MIL mw POW= 1111-111010.MOON•7124 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 1 .NC RW1 tD110 1/12/04 caw �1 IC Walter H.Knapp Silviculture& Urban Forestry November 21, 2003 BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE— VILLAGE INN/ BORDERS SITE ARBORIST REPORT The Bridgeport Village - Village Inn/Borders Site has 63 trees larger than 12-inches in diameter located within the City of Tigard. The trees appear to be in fair-to-good condition,based on visual examination. Two of the trees larger than 12-inches will be removed, and 61 (97%) will be protected and retained. In addition, a small (10") bigleaf maple will be cut. Since more than 75% of the trees larger than 12-inches in diameter will be retained, no mitigation will be required. A summary of the tree species, sizes, and disposition is shown in the following table: Trees to Remain Trees to Cut DBH Douglas-fir Bigleaf Maple Total Douglas-fir Bigleaf Maple Total (10)* (1) (1) 12 2 1 3 14 5 3 8 16 5 5 1 1 18 6 6 20 4 4 (18,16,20)** 1 22 3 3 24 8 8 26 11 11 28 5 5 30 2 2 32 1 1 34 2 2 36 2 2 • 38 1 1 Totals: 57 4 61 2 2 * 10-inch tree shown for information only. ** One tree,three trunks _ Number of trees larger than 12 inches in diameter: 63 Number of trees larger than 12 inches in diameter retained: 61 %retained: 97% Mitigation category: No mitigation required 7615 SW Dunsmuir Lane,Beaverton,OR 97007 Phone:(503)646-4349 Fax:(503)265-8117 Page 2 of 2 0366 Bridgeport Village Arb 11/21/2003 Walter H Knapp Tree Protection Measures Most of the trees on the site are far from the proposed construction, and are located in reserve islands bordering existing vehicle parking surfaces. Only a small portion of the site will need protection measures as specified here: 1. Site Plans. Tree protection measures, including the location of protection fencing, shall be included on site plans to ensure that contractors and subcontractors know the protection requirements. 2. Designation of Tree Protection Area. The Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) is defined here as the dripline of the tree(s). Protection fencing shall be installed at or beyond the TPZ of trees bordering the area directly affected by construction. 3. Protection Fencing. Chain link fencing a minimum of 6 feet tall shall be used to protect the trees. Fencing shall be secured to steel posts placed no further than 10 feet apart or on concrete blocks if located on paved surfaces. Construction on the site shall not begin until protection fencing is in place and inspected by the project arborist. The fencing shall remain in place throughout the construction process, and shall not be moved unless under the direct supervision of the project arborist. 4. Operations within the TPZ. No construction activities are permitted within the TPZ unless authorized in advance by the project arborist and the City Forester. Any operations within the TPZ shall be under the direct, on-site supervision of the project arborist. 5. Storage of Material or Equipment. Storage of equipment or supplies beneath the canopy of any retained trees on the site is prohibited, except on paved surfaces. 6. Excavation—TPZ. Excavation within the TPZ is prohibited. �j j,�'� / Walter H. Knapp Certified Forester, SAF 406 Certified Arborist, ISA PN-0497 Enclosure:Tree Table Spreadsheet 7615 SW Dunsmuir Lane,Beaverton, OR 97007 Phone:(503) 646-4349 Fax:(503)265-8117 r i 1 Ex h , b11- 4-ry 1 9a a �fI'' rel zz U>fTTTi � . a. e I EXISTING (900) (,000) („oo) o f (,03) aEKn C O U A CC-'-/----/-11::-1E S N a° I I BUILDING (600) $ A °97D59,9s V 1 E N 0. k a I "'TING I I I I I I—, TM S.A. -I T LAT STREET EDCE a u a aLaov+G EXISTING L� PAYENENT ✓B'�'M�'-° =� i. EX9 BWLDING VARNS (1700) _�� I S88 9.34"E 821.19' a,Iro FENCE BUILENNG -�-� EXOSTNIG •'CONSTRUCTION TITITITI (,500) (,600) 1 " S88F_+ _ _ o I a B "` E 93. `�� "s..iI osts L N 7A �yJ - I EXISTING•IDOL.N0.950 J/\/ �.. I • - �T Ili BUILDING _°n�Hr t IA . F LEGEND O ',`,\�� �� I I Q YbNI - 0.fNfl/NT L•[ Z ��/ VIII(►iH IP 8 I'I;; , _ • . i S88'S0'S6°E - 1 146 .7' 'l >' �' / � —�!* ni f / �' —T,oD) G . �:: ...a ;." .;. ' —1AR,,,,.TIE 7� �//// / ,iLi , ,n., �'ooc"°9TOB I�.� t y� 07Y oP MALKIN Q MT n nnm0 //� •q D.mZ AfIKT Q IIUIT ML ��•_ '`t`C"t����/ 1 1 p Qmc u� D.OW M[ �Iy \ \\ T ,• 1' iff CC MI.! g Q unm KU y sNar wn 'I _ ..... • Q SRET LYR D rte.' �g0 �, � �T O 0.aYmg QleATavt p � / i /� 20. ` " J R Q aT rKTE 7.-N Q Nnewr RC (200) .. `��r' ' �atil� /A rx�.�,u Q M P MLK "� NE[, ��Avr t:I,I \\ \ yj. // \\ — (70 0.NAM Q..1BI.LmI ›. Z Na „Ci `K„'TR J�+ I..i �I - CC rwBlttiuw ur Q..+a so ar SNa li✓, j/ Y / n smr uc•muses //J� (a1 �_ 0 9 31}i ` D . /�/ :. I ,;> )' G, n O[awn.M N6lA; C i s yr�� 6 �� o /-r. I o ix um.woo. O qz f /� 19' • Q sw C/ i j• OD 1 a)/ j4OO . BER RIES pL• / '{.C� PAVEMENT v ; 9 �9 r �! $°' (1300) j i .._P7 4 M1 A\ O 411°\(500) 2 VILLAGE INN cv �6 `O ,NET "'DSAT V I200) SITE DL..4„n w11SBO W a In o ! lw �� . � T V A t A ' Z �r -�° E Y s srwc t z a RB V A l \ ' iEDGE � . HOMES\ (PP or sr N. s BOIR[S s, ,„ f >o W I.0 ` , • • • 1 7,,,..... ....• 1 Inch . TOO fl • PREPARED BY: r (600) . R /�4 $ 1,- EASING LDC Eoa Design Group Inc ED / ) i X. Planners v `,�� ARCHITECTS VAN LOM]CQMPA►NY Engineers $ �sm � VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT S°"`�°� ]300 N.W.surveyors TERRAQ I 0`- (400) wLa a/RC SO 658,242 24• EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP Em%50]65.5500 IaTa„;p.t.N i '� TIGARD, OREGON PortNW d,First 9720 r Suite 309 © O PPTCS a ARCHITECTS VAN WM.COMPANY 503.226.0590 ALA,PC L 4A r II ! �` 1 b ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1- �- — 4\ 11 /i, 1 il I - I i / t / i .1 J II 1 i. 1 1 i i { r i G / r j 1/'I rig , 1�' T 171 D; / NOTE: / WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS ARE INCLUDED TI lTlTl IN THE "OFFSITE" (PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS TO II / SW BRIDGEPORT RD. & SW 72ND AVE.) / . I I �' /" DRAINAGE REPORT. ---------k_ T I -- _ 55TiWw ggiu�p� ,�-- , =ORDEILS�BOOic NUSIC"XNe CAFE � 1� i /l / \ giftwki / / i 41, \,,( 11,‘ , i 1 a /- I 111 . I "....J,/,,, Y /Vil PROPOSED'BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE" I ' FUTURE DEVELOPMENT I P�.,Os 1 .-' '-' -----, �� (Ex1STING DURHAM QUARRY) • �� ! j NOTE: _ Cxf1 OF TIQARp _� / 1,> J,�it —__—__—__— _% SEE SEPARATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR CITY OF TUALA Q�4, ,ei. C /:" SW BRIDGEPORT ROAD AND SW 72ND AVENUE. PROPOSLO OFFSITE � \\ � /'iI B•MANHOLE(TYPICAL) � TW 1Y � � ,�a / WE ..,� PR/ .` .�ul [ ` /•ONNSITE SANITARY �P� -wA ��• ll�' (7ypICK)0 CIFAN /STYPIC ) /EANOUT/,/II ( Al ;) n O R J 1 / 'pO in WATER _7,44 - -. i ! #4 / PAC'-`k y/,C('J f f•WAMTY NANHOIE 7� I: � ,��`\` / STORM FILTER J f / LLAGE INN; •,Ar. ► 00 r i ! f RESTAURAN Tr'\4I I!_1' - C M,7 ���/`���� �. 'OSED I-WATER 1[lER p E i ` `4 a.nREHYDRANT /1 ----------- --- 1 Loch = en ft.i _ 11\... PROPOSED t•WATER SFRNCE— �IJJ ��� / PROPOSED POE UNOER.,r , - -'—-----_- 1 OPOSED CREASE • TRANSWS40N LJES f 3 1 i 1°5 /� �'' PREPARED BY: I / T Rp. s 1 .%� /1 BRIDGE FU?pRE)� ('/ 1 (�TYP6Y �"11 (P°P°�iE � I Q.DC.., " /PROPOSED O TWE � l Design Group,Inc _ ��\/ YANIDLE(TYPICAL / IuI ARCHITECTS VAN LOM©��..FIlu�PANY Engineers s dr / 2 1 Surveyors 5301 HAV.2117A 7ERRACE VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT / ! 503.615 500 pHowc N � ` oz PROPOSED UTLITIES AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 34NW6.0590 Avenue,Suite 309 ARCHITECTS Portland, OR 97209 Q C O P Y R I G H T, 8 503.226.0590 A ACHE CTS VAN LOM+COMPANY TIGARD, OREGON 4B L. J r ■ /E :;L i� Cry- -7 I 1 / PRCe05E0 4' .LL ii LLL1.� lLLl..iJ, ,`j EMERGENCY GATE 1��� _ S.1►.PINDIAY STREET %'`°`� _ i;7. .`vi ••• ' FIRE ACCESSWAY b .�'r,?� - - -F. . — .� . rte,( ^♦ ► A T :-- ' .': REGAL CINEMA [ �� °� �, >7EST � • O/r ''. ' ill. .... ...:. ,:-.. ,..i..y.'7:, „,, ,„: .-:,—,-;,..„.4.•,, a, i ....7,,,titiki,„ .. .. -..t‘47,•k4:14P'VP -v441.114-vhW-411.11.1";- • .4 ._r!..1.A 1 ..:A 7'' e—ter_ _= -- -= --- ^.T- -'i4. c -•..�` ,. «. �N- � 7.'" ; _ Irri �,� t I 1 IL .% , '.,,,%� . r._ j141 ■ 1 r ,A ' A! 4 rI `g ,„ , ANIL „ II 5r \ } C� $ . iy pi i . ,� ;41,.1:0, :' �/ :a; is :w r. i' I ,I` 0:: I_'�r ] BLDG 0 1 BLDG®7 / ' CRATE 1 o� 0 �A 1� rii a r L-- - o1CC 8 7r r �5� LEGEND L ■. II TT TM .�_a_.:- ate:► a �l . •"'r^• W,w;�1��-d�ii/�ii�t,`I' 7• ,+ -•++++++••+ PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION 4 �� r�l`J- f I a El e oc. hl it .E*. �, ` + - X4,0— PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION THROUGH RETAIL BLDG(E) rl N 'N x 0 14,Ili I ■I i 1 1'M4. `, t �� N�l�♦ VEHICULAR CIRCULATION �;f� � +`' �..Q �� ,?� FIRE ACCESSWAY 4' + / / /+o `,.'r VILLAGE INN I BICYCLE PARKING(VILLAGE INN): 6-SPACES(2 COVERED,4 UNCOVERED) / / A'''r t SITE I r • "/ -- / s � t 6 lir t;'',., 1114•, ,,. its 1. •. „. •� , rev F! 3 ,, :,_, as \ m m m m k e ♦' • • ` y 1 Snell IOO A. PREPARED BY: I. 1 LDC --, ' (.....„-- 5 ,. Deslgn Group,Inc 1 .. ARCHITECTS VAN LOMla COMPANY Engineers Surveyors VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT 3>�Nwr,TMA� NuP PRONE 9011514242 31511.am VFAX 500.16X53 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT/PROPOSED STREETS PLAN �°` '`� 34 NW First Avenue,Suite 309 10/20/03 TIGARD, OREGON Portland,OR 97209 ©ARC CTS VAN LOM+COMPANY 503.226.0590 4C J . .- T:\Dm\R000001\RCKb001\dwg\RC1C2—PARKnRIDE\Rr' 2-DD2-3.dwq Feb 19. 2004— 1:53pm Rih 1 N v' V,, t. $, , PROJECT NUMBER \':',:\. t -� DE IGN EXISTING BUILDING BORDERS soars MUSIC AND i 14 DE L-PMENT ? I '�I■ I --� /, / FEBf�UARY. 2004 ' I 7 I Ab%dIrJ \ ���I,I // '!% fT 46' Pi ® — I i 4 V a 1 0 10 20 40/i j / p � K //� tl, J4 'RR r.. y Y / IMilliMIOMt M��9 4 / f I p y �/ z _ . I MAoIARr coNs ucno EASEME7vr -- / .pi TI '// J4'FIR '�• W ♦ I •D SDR 203 000 // • 17 I / • l� � ♦♦ I _ EDGE OF PAVEMENT - �_- 10'M i : ill C.J. t < / - / - — — ------- / O 14'F7R *L..•hi f" �(,♦ COWCRETE&Aga(RETUNING , A r -- �0-�R-/�7 I /� ��� � 1 ♦.. i J4' i,(IT► a'FIR ,iT . j Ii!/` x• / •b i ,►♦�� (3) la: FIR ilik � . '!ice r77�/ �. C, p'� /• Ill■.lc t4a 1 \ _ la•FTR `ti •, `_ ,� T _40111.4111111.11.113111111101 12111111.11111,= EZ- p -- -- .11111.1.18"; a' B'FIR / / :MI ' 111 TCARD.. y' T4'f1R ?T• / C7 1 f• !` / . .. DEVELOPMENT ,C11 Ili • �\ -CITY •- —.. / .. ° .W . - ,. SA •/ as r../d, '911i i -- 1 / /ip-A0,-,40: , _ ,,l;v: _, .. 1 1 , , iid , 0 g§ / ,\9.5,6.cp 4 .,...-:. N. i 4 5' Q //�/ E /, q�A X23 : x s 16 �. k it::/ ' 600 e010 � ' 4 < I 2.D !iIJ/ / < I h 101 slgr = e ti t ' / Wo O , • /1 7 i //"/ 0 / . I < "o 1- , 1 fil Swill' -id i gi ♦ e C Z 1` -,� N , . , ,x ♦ `` 4'MAPLE , ' /// : 4 � � 111 V P © ,y ♦ (n - 0 •4 / pAF21CDIG SPACE COUNT' / . , ' C'3 Q / , PRESENT 121/� ♦ Z , i LOSS S ♦/' ♦� ' ~ ,, I / / GAIN 0 I y � 1 ♦ p WI MAPLE % ' TOTAL 116 d1 z ,♦ f x ♦ t X _ ALL SPACES ARE STANDARD �.. O ec �∎♦ �\ • W ,, / UNLESS DENOTED MATH C Z W 1► x 4 MAPLE 9/I I 0 j*��`9'♦��♦i►. I , =1 •;.�!� k +M QI.. is w c,/ / .. A A♦ 1iY:�iG� � x Ia 4• i /Q/// H O W Z l� z 0 0 4'MAPLE 1 ,' , =O ice► ♦ • = I ,s / 8 Q +/45 :.. : �`Z. \\ 04.UAPi ,' i CA I�"_` d o cc WV-441.11111111111.110' . c•iviiimilluet_iarillill'am....................„,r. : ........ 11•114.4 = ♦. 4111k. 4'MAPLE �i �' iff 1 Z O.It. Q N :roialrl101.1.11.11.11111111171 4,410A, ��♦�•1- 4A °�±' _ -S W. �O i `RRY ROAD �,• _ — - DD-2 4D MAR. 3.2004=11:11AM�DAVID EVANS AND ASSOC-PORTLAND NO.931 P.2/ill 2 1 g LL CI 17 1 > .11 g . ' III g El ! 11 11 ' 1 6 II 1 B 1, lit,' §:1 ii ril 1 g i it 11 ili II 1 1 i 1! . ii,,i 41 01 01 � � 41 la I �1 • 2 III 1 II UI it I rz ,c PI 1- -- ::,31t ; ' di ii 1 lb III Ili!". .wN1 � i L� � � � � N N M .d �i �� � � Igo ti V 0 wil i L ,,o lwa ay:. L.1h- 1 s �� z 0041•64 y g II 5 91]1 pli i q4 R L t. ! ibi i..-iii—gii c., $ il— uw.oe14,t 51 h� O 14 111 '44 : I as �` ..I x ,.' b 1 4 , mu 11 1_311 1 I llf st 051° i ,i 1 li ''' ' 3 1 11 24L (7)— ° " Chh 6 . !g ; .'� ;., ti 'I' o b / Ai::,,, 1_,!;...-:,., . mil 1 4 71 iot mar hscmi jk T 8 ..; (041 . - . .2.r -71 0 .. 0 ,,,, 2 h r Cr 1 i i fol%37:119 1 1P4° o li 44 (11 " it it .11 litli h .81 Is t i i I. 1 15.2 kw O 0011,1 LIDPIO4PA RP705 , PHOEcr NUMBER SWALE r" RETRY TABLE WATER QUALITY SWALE DETAILS Qt Const. 2421. x 10'w x 10'H Precast x PREUIIuNARY DESIGN _ RCB (ASTM C-1433) Nov. 2003 a: 0 DESCRIPTION N E Precast RCB Detention Facility • Inst. 36" Sew. Pipe - 14.7' . A BEG. SWALE 637753.76 7625198.99 0 Sta. "72" 77+00.50 (22.2' Lt) Vis B FOREBAY 637754.27 7625200.92 Diversion Manhole a Coordinate Final Rim Elev. With C PC 637746.41 7625171.18 Washington County Project /2550: Lower Boones Ferry Road From Booties O PT 637699.92 7625166.30 Ferry Road To Bridgeport Road E END SWALE 637681.50 7625202.76 (For Details, See Sht. 2B) 0 O3 Connect To Existing Manhole fn Inst. 12' Sew. Pipe - 103.2' , O ;� `" y`�` R=25.00' O Q4 Ste. "72nd" 77+00.67 (9.7' Lt) /C))\ Tan = 65.80' O /\ .`\ Const. Large Precast Conc. Manhole (72'Dio) ' = 13873'32"�(� �}- - - Coordinate Final Rim Elev. With ,� j / Washfigton County Project X2550:,�' _ Lower Boones Ferry Road From Booties Ferry x' �� `/ Road To Bridgeport Road' r r8,re re ---\ Road �_ ` Inst. 36` Sew. Pipe - 12.5' / m 1 (See CWS Drg. No. 650) � o^ ��i^ \ �1� _ �( O5 Sta. "72" 77+02.31 (71.T Lt) / O' „ _ O ; r" �J p Cons. Swale Forebay � �� 0 Inst. 12' Sew. Pipe - 47.6' o /1 N. / 0 1�1i �NCn -� O Ol Ijv` ll�l'O (For Details, See Sht. 26-4) • • 1 -t1 H 6 Const. Water Quality Swale «dpi �,' n� /r O _ (For Profile And Details, See Slits. �_ © �,,���, 2B-3 do 28-4) o �Iv r , / ��,,,� O�T� "72ND" LINE Q Ste. '72" 79+69.27 (12.4' Lt) <a 0 - 1 i . OH �,47!:��� 24"-12.1' o<s � /�`j� �� 0 Const. Flow Control Structure (72" Dia.) C 1`,�.__ !w�'/ ` 0 - - • Orifice Diameter 7.66" I" • •� 0 \,. _ Riser Elev. 171.59' J�- �� �', v � --�_7fT Inst. 24' Sew. Pipe 12.1' o Limits Of - --- - I J ` _ 47.6' _--`� �v _ - (For Details, See Slit. 2B) --Gr�adlhq- _ 0 12' - 24.1 I 12' ---- ----- 24'-32 •' - '- Oe Water Quality Manhole (By Others) I 6" W(R)--------- -- 36"- 125' _. "' 4.••• O _ -I ,, , + O ® Sta. "72' 76+29.57 (68.9' Lt) R- _ .__ ______ Const. Ditch Inlet 1 s 1' CaP 4. I (See CWS Drg. No. 250) , _�; ho gSrN� S.yy LOWER BDONES___F:i:R_Iy____R___o__A D ,o Ste. '72' 76+23.08 (45.6' Lf) • _ 1 O, -_-__ G = � `"- O Const. Inside Drop Manhole 10"1 - i -- 10" G -- ---- --- .=--- --- - -- -- -- - -- - 1 oI u= ----�---- -- ----- - ------ --�' _----- �'�, Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe 24 ' I (See CWS Drg. No. 070) ` -_- Milt -- �, _ --`��' �___-- tt Connect To Extg. Manhole _ 1 _ 1 - '- -- / \ i^I Inst. 24' Sew. Pipe - 127.4' - - I A(�) Q;' 1 RNI SEPTIC o �`� � r �� `itR t© 18" Sewer Pipe (By Others) O o J � _7 FEILD (R) ,NI Q 0 . ) © Jr�,\ t3 Proposed Storm Improvements y.1---- __ - •36® `t ;1 ,.' (By Others) O a; N - ST • .r • to 0 ; 10 Q U P R --"-------- .. .Sd I o,�, ,�.- ei >- N CY) 0 17\ ____ -- 36" s , _ ),_,7_1c) etp r ?_345-,- -----__ J 36'`ATM wj c)1 t g i it 3 o L -,--) 0 -----,- ® !R -, op m F- I- J (... SHEET NO. 213-2 4G r . . . . ..... . . ..... . _ _ SUGGESTED PLANT MATERIAL LIST Eh ; f5 sir__ �� SYMBOL COMMON NAME __ TTTrrrrll��—'[-[-_x-T-_I_.r_f_7---- BOTANICAL NAME -_J , 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 TREES �j, AREAS IN TIGARD CITY LIMTS TO BE LANDSCAPED -_ �`C__ Cutleaf Weeping Birch-(SEE SUGGESTED PLANT MATERIAL LIST THIS PAGE) ' -----1 , , , , , , Betulo pendula 'Dolecorlica' IP. P ;-',--:--;-:4-.(-1 1 Betulo Tree - rrrI 1 r 1 -J Cercidophytlum joponicum r- --I I Patmore Ash L- _--1 ' Fr oxinus pennsylvonico 'Patmore' I I , , 1 1 , 1 „ r I �= LI 11l I i�I i-1 1 11 i -� ) _ I • Potmore Ash 1 U , 1 1 I , i U , I , , , 1 U 1 _ Froxinus pennsylvonico 'Patmore' _-- -J/ Patmore Ash I D„..i_:_; x i I R i , , I , , fl _ ....:47r.....,o �' Froxinus pennsylvanica 'Patmore' r-- U . i . I 1 U 1 , ', , , : U :1 _ r Roywood Ash _J - I Froxinus oxycarpa 'Raywoodii _r_ -J _ / Raywood Ash r 11 , 1 1 , 1 111 1 r 1 " (1 -J - 1 Froxinus oxyGarpo 'Raywoodii L- Ih�I I I I I~F1 I„i I I —� _ - I „ I „ U r , 1-L-71-1 • , , , U --+ ., SHRUBS -~ SIT' Butterfly Bush 1nit1lllni , „ 1 , —� E:Ls 1 1 L LLIJS j-L LLIJ C -' I l,I ',� Buddleia dovidii 'Petite Indigo' ----- +1 --- ' r ( Blue Holly D ' �� ` Ilex x meserveoe 'Blue Girl' & 'Blue Boy' - (1/3 Blue Girl: 2/3 Blue Boy) ---:::: -"' -- --- ` >� Blue Holly ( 1 T 1 ,i T,Ir \v. Ilex x meserveae 'Blue Girl' & 'Blue Boy' - (1/3 Blue Girl: 2/3 Blue Boy) j i `Y Drooping Leucothoe I r_ C� _ �� Leucothoe for.tanesiona -i _ ;`�/ Dense Yew Taxus x media 'Densiformis' sormeresoaro. G"Q ,.v. Fountain Gross //� _ __�__ -� - �vti Pennisetum olopecuroides 'Hamelin' //y/ r- c_� _ v v Little Bunny Fountain Grass •/j r_- _--1-- --1 r Pennisetum olopecuroides 'Little Bunny' !, r -EXIa�`TING_ / • Heavenly Bamboo AREAS LANDSCAPED PEDE ///� I- -f'IIkR_KING--I 1 hfi' Nondino domestico 'Compact°' (SEE SUGGESTED �- - Laurustinus PLANT MATERIAL �_ _�=_� --- ----- Viburnum tinus 'Spring Bouquet' / r -'-- // UST) r/ L- --1-- r 1 , , ; . n ,* Pink Meidilond Rose ' _ 1-- 1 ' 1 .-u+11 I I i i I ,�1 Rosa x Meidilond 'Pink' t= �' �1-1 � II1rI1 � f _ ;_; .1 . , , , Rugoso Rose - (2)SPACES TO BE Rosa rugoso 'Purple Pavement' • / r- CREMOVED .,� GROUNDCOVER 1 l�� , - Annual be Flowers bloom at time of grand owner.opening. ..mom a...a J `' i 410%,_, / 9 P g• RRnp 000- n,rruvl v �� R' �\ + Lowfast Cotoneaster ���� `\ I� I �Y,Jr i i Cotoneaster dommeri 'Lowfast' or, + /:i, ` T . Jr, •; `.r . Seed/Sod Lawn / i~i \' / L-" `f.; ;'ti,/ :J: .,�Yr. - r' NOTES f / ,Er / 1. Installation must fully comply with all landscape code requirements and any City of• F�) `,/., EXISTING;• /.1 •, Tlgord conditions of approval. / •l,• PARKING N // / 1 2. For sizes and s species of existing trees to remain, see Arborist Report and Civil Plans. r s' . i \P\ 1 . t . P 9 P r �.l` i r�/ 1)� / 3. Irrigation to be provided by a fully automatic underground system. The irrigation system r, ;1. i ' 1 shall be design/build by the Landscape Contractor. _, 5 / 2;; =w )i i a a s e ifo ,m mi En wwwwws BRIE 4 R PREPARED BY: Sw. i LDC a h Design Group,Inc $ /W Planners x ARCHITECTS VAN LOM©COMPANY Engineers VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT Surveyors ' 3300 N.W 211Th TERRACE y HILLSBORO.OREGON 97124 $ PHONE 503.151 4242 , LANDSCAPE PLAN EAr5WB45.5500 ....Iticdeyn.com al 34 NW First Avenue,Suite 309 10/20/03 TIGARD, OREGON Portland,OR 97209 RCSECTSVANLOM+COMPANY 503.226.0590 AIA,PC 5A _I i- -1 ' /// f--- - LANDSCAPE LEGEND SYNeOL GOM10N NAME SIZE/GOND. SPA4IN6 TR�S BOTANICAL NAME p CYe Gutleal Weeping Birch 2'cal. 20'oz. T Betula pendub 17alecrlice. KT Katsura Tree 2•cal. 27',,,, — _-.; Gercbophylium JOponic rn - i Ai? _ i PA Patmore Ash 2'col. 70'o.c. Fraxhu•pamsylvanlco Patmre' PAOI Patmre Ash 2.7'cal. >0'o.c. FraxYws pemsylvonlca Pafmre' _ PAS2 Patmore Ash 73'Gal. 70.oz. Fraxhw pem•ylvanie0 Paterora' ��� RA Rcywood Ash 2'cal. 70'0<. Y Fraxss.s axycrpa'ROyaaodll' lir ' ''' RA•I Rcxjrood Ash 73'cal. 70'o<. IS Ma FfoxFUS O%yGar'pa'RayltOOd11' - , r.., ` SHRUBS qr wxw ,wt-.*'q BB Butter/ Bush 24'-70' b'o.c. Pare9";_�-_ems y! •.°f.'J 't•► Buddleb davldli Petite Indigo' CITY OF TIG4RP ,';'" •. --las ,�. �-p� BIN Blue roll 24'-70' 75'o.c. Ilex x 151.aervee T31 Girl'9 Blue -(I/7 Blue Elul:2/7 Blue Boy) - I Blue Holly 24'-70• 4'O.G. CITY OF TUALATIN `'"�'' + - S�j. - - Hex x me•arveae Blue Girl'/5.Boy'-(I/7 Blue Earl:2/5 Blue Boy) J�.4• �� 0-, h a .�; DL Drooping Lauconloe 2 gal. 7.7'o.c. 1^• « -.. J�: Laucothoe fontrneslano V "PIN`' �s�: (..\\e" DY Dense Yew 24'-70' 7.7'o<. Toxus x media'Derolfarme' '�'�� 9 as Y~ -- F6 Bantam firms I 29'o.c. #444 '�Ji,T,"0 �� \ Pembetum alopeeurobes}broth' }/♦�f9� ' ` F6LB LlLtic Burry Fountah Bross I gal. 23'o<. ,�.��'�O ,� - ` PeMlsetum alopacuroldes Little Burry' j�•�'� /' fit. hD Heavenly Bamboo 24'-70' �.�'o.c. 17%�'�G {�• y Nandlna danrstica'GOmpocta' A0:41.._4110. ��� ,�/ / L Laurustlnus 24"-70' 4'oz. '1 T�F'- 11 r nk Meill thus Spring Bouquet' ds��' 1ry�{II Milli d� / MR Pink Meidlland Rose 24'-70" 'J'c.c. 1 }J`i� . \ - Rosa x Meldlland Pink' .,, . '�dr \/ RR Ru Rase Isis�.• „./•"5:�„ iv ` Rosa 2 got. T oc. ,,; .4„'\ r°1e I�•.'n.,:�. IM �� , \ Rosa rvgosa T::Pavelneni srneencrwe.ro ,}� R � 9'..J "�` r•u :\ \�(`- 61�OIAmGOVER �..x.,m.•,tixA,xa� ,♦iii \,�� ; ' ��" r os per Annual Flower. owrw 4' t C'o.c. �. "^"/I'!•, ' ', AZ•lir ""0"''' To be In bloom of time of ano�► • \� gr opening. 7•.- 4 �'�• � ,x.,.ra.9s9 �:\\\ STI / Lawfmc corer dam r 1 al. 70'o.c. ' sA� :'; ,.•0, KII` e \\\> ` ��nemter dammarl•Lawla.t' g s♦ _, .• ∎41,1,, ,`p t.::,,..A Seed/Sod Lawn //A:Vat& N* ,,� i, ii. / NOTES r w V 1• 1 I. Tiger con must fully appro wfth all[mobcaps Code requirements and any City or .�'` M �11 r Tigard conditions of approval. /•i`�,1a�' \\ � - !ill, 2. Pr sizes and species of existing trees to remain,see Irborlst Report and Civil Plans.•`/��\i 4� j i t 4 7. Irrigation to be provided by a fully automatic underground system. The I^Igatian system ♦ 'J k1� 1 shall be design/to/lid by the Londeeope Contractor. I l '� . aG ■ 1: a,1 4. Mulch all shrub planting beds with a 2'mhFrurn layer. Mulch snail crgbt of modkm grind i , •� ■ �' % yard debris compost. IpNV cI A-.. a `s.,`•vo 4 . uras ,\I:�s C O Dec iduovs Parking Lot Tree ♦ •� ,1st . C; —_ '\11 www \■p,— :,,,, 46,, . \O .4viz...,& 4.7. itt,........) M� s�I e s "Nip, awe w s.w • ti> r ♦ ',.. - �)� wrnz 4•pi iiV 41: -�f "ems/ 6' f^` 4 A�.. ,r^\_` .411.10^ma y 1, o _�` e /\OPRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN a '`�,,�� 4 I' = 30' 1■ 071.1.154n MO STREET liZjel NV' O B' 30' ro' CHRISTOPHER FRESHLEY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ; 1020 B.R.TAYLOR SUIT[555•RORTIANI>.OREGON 97205•503/222-MRR1•(TAI):50.2/229-2099 (E-WUL):FRESNIZYeMSN.00Y S 1 fi 9 I'', ARCHITECTS VAN LOMEICOMPANY . VILLAGE INN RESTAIJRANT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN o. 34 NW First Avenue,Suite 309 10/20/03 TUALATIN, OREGON Portland,OR 97209 ©ARCHITECTS VAN LOM+COMPANY 503.226.0590 AIA,PC 5B J ,:\um\rtua.uuu=yKUL.uuul\awg\Oneets WWI—LA—u4awg Nov 1U. ZUUJ — 4:4/pm um U — -- - � NoRvE. 2 PROJECT 1 O LANDSCAPE W 0 Q 0 Ox PGN N9 ARY 0 Q 0 "72" LINE a o : I t A o ` air 0 s• i '4111/.'. .. D\ • E' / ���'-�i • ��n ` ; fi '�' ._ :. • 2 / \�� :y . _�� r�' ;;r;j;i;; r 0N C� 1 w r k 1 ir � • �= ► � • ; % • y �rlIP ; � S.W li ( 4:414.- -. 4 -,))-- -- _____....... to ,11140...,.......,:.:... .........,::::,,,,:::,.:::.14,:;:.:11.4......t;'_.,:,-.1:s:ii.„-;:,,, ,.. A. .- -Ac.- Aa„„H,--„, „it,■ z - 41F411•46544v'-:,:i..74%-ltiappia),_____. - p.,. ei..: ..7..7.5,....i.i.s.6-"rititt."..77:44.6..41171-1_7111.°"41P-711411--- j-\ am..... ,s,(701.0 41,7,-41.&v,...- - . livi,e-7,1-0-- . . ....I. \ -'``/I , G .1g 3k g gm •(•,,, < A...1::,:0:1 •)1-!.E. .,_:.:.- :T.,_7 ,•----'---v--- -15 \•4 © trill�+ Y'f :44. 0 0 O Install Katsura Tree. Total 13 This Sheet. >4 it O 0 0 (For Details, See Sht. R-6) O2 Install Commemeration Sugar Maple. Total ' � 72 LINE ,- 24 This Sheet. (For Details, See Sht. R-6) � / i'. O3 Install Kinnikinnici;. Total 82 This Sheet i , �9 (For Details, See She. R-6) e s� �;� G (� 2 // ;\ `J Install Warty Barberry. Total 50 This l c�5 / Sheet. (For Details, See Sht. R-6) / 5O Install Dwarf Redtwig Dogwood. Total 420 © 0 / '� This Sheet. (For Details, See Sht. R-6) 0 A- ® Install Lowfast Cotoneaster. Total 72 ' • C /// 1"1.-\ -..-----.---- -\\.\\ �� This Sheet. (For Details, See Sht. R-6) n, NO QJ / `'S4 Install Compact Oregon Grape. Total 140 1 ..^' / This Sheet. (For Details, See Sht. R-6) i f S 8 Install Creeping Mahonia. Total 300 This ": Sheet. (For Details, See Set. R-6) -_': r O Install Cinquefoil. Total 135 This Sheet. �-� (For Details, See Slit R-6) p•` + -X41 / �'''" AIN`• ; " 10 Install Zabel Laurel Cherry. Total 50 This O CA �„� % O Sheet. (For Details, See Sht. R-6) , Z // , grF "v {�I I—co / m o n 24 0 0 4W d J as i- co SHEET tia. R-4 5C Exhibit 6 Traffic Impact Analysis This exhibit includes the following items: 1) Memorandum addressing Access Adjustment for Existing Center Access Point for Tax Lot Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 (Kittelson, November 20, 2003) 2) Letter to Mike McKillip regarding Transportation Impact Analysis for Relocated Village Inn Restaurant (Kittelson, October 23, 2003) 3) Executive Summary: Transportation Impact Analysis for Bridgeport Village (Kittelson, May 2003) C:\Documents and Settings\MattN.LDCMAIN\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK1F\Exhibit 6_COVER.doc � KI TTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW ALDER,SUITE 700 • PORTLAND,OR 97205 • (503)228-5230 • FAX(503)273-8169 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT ACCESS ADJUSTMENT FOR THE RETENTION OF THE EXISTING CENTRAL ACCESS FOR TAX LOT 2S113AD-01700 Date: November 21, 2003 Project#: 6153.0 To: Kim McMillan, City of Tigard From: Mark A. Vandehey, P.E., Principal; Hermanus J. Steyn, Senior Engineering Associate cc: Greg Miller,Washington County, 1400 SW Walnut Street, MS 17B, Hillsboro, OR Mike McKillip, City of Tualatin, 18880 SW Martinazzi Ave, Tualatin, OR Janeen Adamo, ODOT, 123 NW Flanders St, Portland, OR Mike Nichols, OPUS Northwest, 1000 SW Broadway Ste 1130, Portland, OR This memorandum addresses the criteria for an access adjustment associated with the existing shopping center site located on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700, which is located east of SW 72nd Avenue and just north of the existing North TriMet Park & Ride facility (in the vicinity of the Interstate 5/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road interchange) in Tigard, Oregon. This memorandum provides information in support of the access adjustment to the City of Tigard's spacing standards to allow the existing central access to Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 to be retained as a right-in/right-out driveway. BACKGROUND The placement of the proposed accesses for the Bridgeport Village Development was identified in collaboration with Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Washington County, City of Tualatin, and City of Tigard staff as part of the overall transportation improvement program for the site to ensure optimal traffic operations along SW Bridgeport Road and SW 72nd Avenue while still providing access to the existing businesses along the south side of SW Bridgeport Road and along the east side of SW 72nd Avenue. The Bridgeport Village Development located in the northwest quadrant of the SW Bridgeport Road/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road/SW 72nd Avenue intersection, has three site accesses with one being on SW 72nd Avenue. To provide better access management along SW 72nd Avenue, the Bridgeport Village access driveway aligns with a new driveway that will serve the North H:\projflle\6153\Reporl\6153Access-Mod-Tigard-Final.doc City of Tigard Access Adjustment Request Project#:6153 November, 2003 Page:2 TriMet Park & Ride lot, Tax Lot 2S 113AD-01700 (the Borders Bookstore parking lot), and a new pad for the Village Inn restaurant, all located on the east side of SW 72nd Avenue. This new-shared access would be approximately 620 feet north of SW Bridgeport Road. As stated in the City of Tualatin Conditions of Approval, the existing driveway serving Tax Lot 2S 113AD- 01700 will be modified to a right-in/right-out driveway, while the new-shared access would accommodate the left-turn movements prohibited at the existing driveway. The right-in/right-out access would be approximately 270 feet north of the shared access, and approximately 310 feet south of SW Durham Road. Figure 1 illustrates the existing driveways as well as the proposed driveway spacing along SW 72nd Avenue. As shown in Figure 1, Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 is currently served by two full access points (identified as Existing Northern Access, and Existing Central Access). Immediately south of Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 is an existing full access to the TriMet Park & Ride facility. The proposed improvements would limit the existing Central Access to right-in/right-out and replace the existing unsignalized access to the TriMet Park & Ride with a signalized intersection and access drive, which will provide internal connectivity to the TriMet Park& Ride, the existing retail uses on Tax Lot 2S 113AD-01700 and the proposed new Village Inn restaurant. Thus, the overall net effect will be a reduction of full access points intersecting SW 72nd Avenue. Improved internal parking lot connectivity will also provide for better distribution of traffic. SW 72nd Avenue is classified as an arterial by Washington County with a minimum spacing of 600 feet required between points of access. In addition, the City of Tigard has the same 600-foot requirement for access spacing along SW 72nd Avenue. Since access spacing between the new shared access to Village Inn, TriMet and Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700, and the existing Central Access driveway is less than 600 feet, an access adjustment to the City's access spacing standard is required. This request for adjustment to the City of Tigard's access spacing ordinance pursuant to Section 18.370.020(C)(5) of the Tigard Municipal Code - Title 18: Community Development Code is addressed below. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE — COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 18: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE As described previously, the proposed access arrangement along SW 72nd Avenue result in the need for an access adjustment approval from the City of Tigard for the retention of the existing Central Access to Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700. In order to address the criteria by which the City of Tigard evaluates access adjustment requests, the proposed access design was evaluated against the requirements outlined in Tigard Municipal Code. The requirements outlined in these criteria for approving an application for an access adjustment are shown in bold type. The compliance responses are shown in italics: Criterion #1 - It is not possible to share access The existing full-unsignalized Central Access is proposed to be modified to a right-in/right-out access to accommodate the proposed signalized shared access to the south. The shared access provides indirect access to the site, which is out of direction, and does not compliment the existing site layout (i.e.front door location,parking lot layout, etc.). The existing retail uses will still be required to gain an access easement through ODOT for crossing their property (TriMet). Retaining the existing Central Access (although limited to right-in/right-out movements only) Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Bridgeport Village Development November 1 El ! s 4�' D i r 1S t , 1"=250' • 't. (-V IbirA .43— .111rt ;AI co ip,:, . • ' °• EXISTING NORTHERN ACCESS -'� h. . r I^� • =+ ;I C err' !.BED BATH r - * 110 T.1' � .<. 7 &BEYOND ii, , I -• i r •a ,k j .� + & ' TAXLOT ,, EXISTING CENTRAL ACCESS ,III it ilk – ,41'. 4 2S113AD-01700 r,,,":,,,• ; n_ era I ^► f . r.-+ "r".wi1�F� 'A a `+.-. -�4� Q - _ I i / 15 r r, /( .� i-."4 i.I 4fJ/I t, f RDERS 1*f r.1 'w ' = • ` , 3 V�, .---r. - 1 A - :/� f/� ■ +..: . - _ ../r i EXISTING PARK-AND-RIDE ACCESS /j / ,. it ' PROPOSED SOUTHERN �N , ,� ACCESS THROUGH IV ;; , ., - f j ODOT PROPERTY(TRIMET) l / i f • • ■ ' *so/ . / 41* - ' i . i _-_ _—-=--- , \�_,_ �,,. 1b SW LOWER BOONES FERRY RD A, le , /, . Ike St. - - --;---'• . r .., , ,:: . : • . 4./ ,,,,,RO.0. •,' . .e.---.A, \I\ I it"' ' 4".:. ''• 1 /4. `43,, - ...,,,r '`,1„,\C> Al 744, No .-‘-----,__4,1!,,,\\ , . -, -;.I . , /- .,-, . \ \ - .,_ \ ... ,,.. 7 ,,,,, , .v.... . r T ' _� • 't _ , IE! 97.,, 11t lik ; F ` LEGEND ii • k* o• - , l EXISTING SPACING ` - , ' PROPOSED SPACING x * V""" • cn ACCESS TO TAX LOT 2S113AD-01700 FIGURE .:;,.. L TIGARD, OREGON 1 KITTEL &ASSOCIATES,INC. 1 ,.<TRANSPORTATION SON PUNNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING City of Tigard Access Adjustment Request Project#:6153 November, 2003 Page:4 will better serve the community and will minimize the impact to traffic operations and safety at the internal intersection on the TriMet Park & Ride facility. The shared signalized access to the south will only be required to accommodate the left-turns prohibited at the existing Central Access. However, not providing access to Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 via the proposed signalized shared access to the south may lead to confusion and frustration on the part of drivers who turn at the signal expecting to have access to the existing retail uses and are forced to turn-around, exit back on to SW 72"d Avenue and enter the parking lot further to the north. Criterion #2 - There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street The only roadways bordering Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 are SW 72nd Avenue and the Interstate-5 southbound off-ramp. Access to this property is only possible on SW 72nd Avenue. The existing Central Access to Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 would be limited to a right-in/right-out. The proposed improvements will not create any additional access point on SW 72nd Avenue. The proposed signalized shared access to the south will replace the existing access to the TriMet Park & Ride facility and will be needed whether or not internal access is provided through ODOT's property (TriMet) to Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700. Criterion #3 -The access separation requirements cannot be met Having accesses on the northern and southern property lines, any point along the approximately 580 foot Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 frontage would not meet the 600 foot separation requirement. The spacing is comparable to the current spacing between the Central Access to Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700, which is in use by the existing retail development, and the existing TriMet Park &Ride access, respectively. Criterion #4 - The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access The proposed access is an existing full access, which would be limited to right-in/right-out movements only. This would be the minimum requirement, which would continue to serve the existing facilities on the site. Further, the overall net effect of the proposed improvements will be a reduction of full access points intersecting SW 72nd Avenue. Criterion #5 - The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access Based on the traffic operations work provided in the May 2003 Transportation Impact Analysis report developed for the Bridgeport Village development and supplemental refinements to the signal timing parameters, the right-in/right-out Central Access is forecast to operate acceptably during the weekday peak hours. Based on a review of the Safety Priority Index System (SPIS) lists maintained by Washington County and ODOT, none of the intersections/driveways located within the influence area of this site were identified by Washington County or ODOT as having existing safety deficiencies. The planned transportation improvements discussed in detail in the May 2003 Transportation Impact Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon City of Tigard Access Adjustment Request Project#:6153 November, 2003 Page:5 Analysis report are anticipated to significantly improve the operations of all of the study intersections/driveways. The right-in/right-out driveway will not affect safety operations along SW 72nd Avenue or the Central Access due to the geometry of the roadway and adequate sight distance. By eliminating the left turn movements at the Central Access, both the turning volume and the number of potential vehicle conflict points will be significantly reduced, which is anticipated to result in an improvement in safety relative to the existing condition. Criterion #6 -The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met Intersection sight distance at the right-in/right-out driveway was reviewed to ensure adequate sight distance is available. All landscaping in and around the intersection directly south of the right-in/right-out Central Access is planned to be kept clear of the sight-vision triangles and be limited to low-lying ground cover. These vision triangles make provision for both intersection and stopping sight distances. In conclusion, the retention of the Central Access on SW 72nd Avenue as a right-in/right-out driveway only will provide adequate circulation and operation of traffic. We trust that this information is sufficient for the City of Tigard to approve the access spacing adjustment request. Please contact us with any questions you may have regarding the information presented in this letter. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW ALDER,SUITE 700 • PORTLAND,OR 97205 • (503)228-5230 • FAX(503)273-8169 October 23,2003 Project#: 6153 Mike McKillip,P.E. City of Tualatin 18880 SW Martinazzi Ave Tualatin, OR 97062 RE: Transportation Impact Analysis for Relocated Village Inn Restaurant- Tualatin, Oregon Dear Mr. McKillip, The existing Village Inn site is located in the southwest corner of the existing SW Bridgeport Road/SW 72nd Avenue/Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection with accesses off SW Bridgeport _ ____ Road and Lower Boones Ferry Road. The proposed road improvements in the vicinity of the _ Interstate 5/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road interchange requires the realignment of the SW 72nd Avenue/Lower Boones Ferry Road route increasing the intersection spacing between the southbound ramp terminal intersection and SW 72nd Avenue. This realignment goes through the existing Village Inn site. It was agreed that Village Inn restaurant would be relocated as part of this road improvements. The relocated Village Inn site will be located in the northeast corner of the new SW Bridgeport Road/SW 72nd Avenue/Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection, just to the east of the Bridgeport Village Development. Access to the Village Inn site would be through a shared signalized intersection off SW 72nd Avenue. The project development team met with various parties and/or jurisdictions to reach an agreement regarding the future access to the Borders Bookstore property, the North Tri-Met Park & Ride lot, and the relocated Village Inn restaurant. Figure 1 illustrates the latest site plan and access concept. The new signalized access will lead to an internal intersection that will provide individual access to the Borders Bookstore parking lot, the north Tri-Met Park & Ride lot, and the Village Inn parking lot. To maintain efficient and safe traffic flow through this intersection, it has been proposed that the intersection be stop controlled on the three parking lot access legs and uncontrolled on the leg coming off of SW 72nd Avenue. Based on discussions with Washington County and ODOT staff, they concur with the proposed geometry and proposed form of intersection control. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. completed the transportation impact analysis for the Bridgeport Village Development in Tualatin, Oregon in May 2003. This study included the following assumptions for analyzing the traffic operations at the signalized combined access on SW 72nd Avenue. H:\projfile\6025\corresp\6153-Village-Inn.doc Transportation ImpactAna/ysis for F,, ated Village inn Restaurant Project, •6153 October2003 Page:2 • Manual turning movement counts were obtained at the existing Village Inn driveways on SW Bridgeport Road and SW Lower Boones Ferry Road, and along SW 72nd Avenue at the Tri-Met and Borders Bookstore accesses in February 2003. • The existing Village Inn trips were transferred to the new site via the combined access on SW 72nd Avenue. • A proposed right-in/right-out driveway replaces the existing full access driveway to the Borders Bookstore property as outlined in the conditions of approval for the Bridgeport Village development. The turning movements restricted at the existing Borders driveway were rerouted to the combined access. • The traffic volumes at the existing Tri-Met access were also added to the combined access. • Construction of the Bridgeport Village development (including the new Village Inn site) is anticipated to begin in late 2003 with full build-out and occupancy by 2005. As shown in the May 2003 traffic study, the combined signalized intersection on SW 72n1 Avenue is forecast to operate acceptably during the weekday p.m. peak hour (level-of-service "C" and volume-to-capacity ration of 0.52). As such, the Village Inn related traffic is easily accommodated with the proposed design. We trust this letter adequately addresses the traffic impact associated with the relocation of the Village Inn restaurant. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding the _-_— contents of this letter. Sincerely, KITTELSON& SSOCIATES, INC. M k Vandehey, P.E. Principal cc: Bruce Wood/John Gordon/Mike Nichols/Roger Fricke, OPUS NW Kittelson&Associates, Ina Portland, Oregon 1ti).1,1 I III 1, .. • ii 1 1 ,, 1 4; 0 /-I• I I II ■+ I ... 1 7 i • . 1"-=.50' 1/ I ii • 14 .. ---',., 1,,,IX ° //. q ., ,O(r.„■:,, -,. I . I I • • //1 ii.N. I I i 1 ,... . , ....,. . I 1 I t.„..„.. Vir . I 1 A ' a A 1, LI ' I i _ _ 1 Izii .: ri 1. ,_ III i (:e ..1, . -,,i , * 11 II __ ,1 ov. ), 1 :: sp 1 i , 3 ,1 4 .. 4k3 I _ _________ /1•, i , ti / ,..,, II / II 1 ,: i , , .1 ,. 1 i ......w ___ _x____ ____x_______x : . ; i . .. .... ,)t,; 1 .2 , , ,iy., f,.;, _ N i {-.q r• 11 ....... N 111 ii-- , ,. _, . / - \ \ 1 p'• i I/ , ,,, I , : i 1 linn o \ I. 0 \ \ / / 1 , /1 1 0 . 4. ..4 / i: , II IIIIINRII I 0 \ \ 0 I", :' // ZI> • I , \ . ,,. .:, w.:**'.1 • 1 ,' / 'all • ' / 1 , z,N \ \\ • :4 . 'At*? / / / I ir. • 1 \ , iy / -111 zr . . _ :2i2/ /,/, (4 //.:,//: \ \\\\\\% it x ''' / 11 /10 I ii--- IDE - . e • -- c immistum 41 To I ___ __11 0 i .4. ‘i -41 i ' I! ___ rifilfi - - - --- 8" cilhA(H) '' • >5 / I // 0 I I I . --. I'll" .. ,-- 1 ' I I i _ .1 . _ ! __i _ _ _ i _ j '' /a I I , t-q\ \ ii 101- i Ai 4 0 _ . mim, :, , 1 ' 4g i k i i-- —– 7:–:- ." W –-–- ...--, r w - -- - - - - - . / / ' / ■ r- ts I A*, ■ I ___ N q%NI • rr 1- qi , /i r 4 ' = ---' 1 / :A II .JrzA.,. ..:, ' -- c ,,----•-, 1 1 L .E_r 7421,,,, It d .-.a''< I/ •• \ / TVA 't-- ,,,i/J I_ ‘ , # o C 4 0.- n..... • .'3'." ..-1-‘ - . - ' • 11 14.4.1- 41111401; lb, iii, / Ail: --'-: 0\ it ...;., itc* -•:)-h, , 1 • \\ - __,, (0 _ ■•" / • / Vii - _. I rittLiSlj 1 —.01t); i ISP - ---741- 14---_ ` - - ...--- j'') A AO ■ • / "1 ' . f Ir• II / ,' WI/ / / 4. # .4 c. --"1-01 • Oa 0111 ,•, \ t ' / i'■ . . ,r,1k011-.95, 2 ik t .t, . , , e• /. // i >(ci_) 4ggio I Pr' „... .. • , .,/, 3- , I i- 1 l'i&C I- I,• O4° .1-\ S .-• le 1 r_ 1 I ii, 1. 1 04 f-,r v / L 4, 1 :+ , ... 1_1 . i „r. ./ 1 j si j1 %.- 0 10 1 i" ‘ .. ;41 I‘ 4 1 / / ' / /6' ii gai 1 I 11 HMI I / ':.'4.• 4r----1--- rr kl i jail 1 1.1 —kir) 1 , . // Oryliii -I 0 .N4,, , 1 , -- .g. .I–•11- , ' Ai ./[ ° . / . / ./. 1 lia_ i0 \o .-3 e ; 41A A I / , // / ktil I / 4 .b,, / 0. t..;-•-'7%w - ) 4 1 - I • il ! 0 . te A:',-,- • - , i 0 9 10.1 , ,/ / . / • <4,-44A ,I, 0 /..? bk -6'. flAttk I dto, .4 ( :iv „00., -1■1.,46. te■ 1 04kt doreft,SItt° ik. in5i3331/164111"111111! ' c t. . 'c__'__ -, i-jr_0(1_.-- '- • lite ill __ __ -- m-- ---7-...rig-te-1---— R- • - -- -/ E----- I 4 11-4.4 tl 4 WO' - _------ III \ 'I a_ IP -- 1"--- ___ -- ‘ 4. (:)\ ( ,I / , ..> _;:i...,\y/r. II s ■ --- ,it '-...1 ‘ i ,. < 4 k- -- I _-=____ ___ , . - -is.---1 __-- , \ , ' ou -- 1---r (,). v . ,. Iiiiii).,(....... q , .,- „- , \ / ii) c? ----,----- -- 4a._f? . '. ..°)'1,r/, 1 n 1 ,,, ,.,1,1 -- . .,\_ . , -- • - ../ .. L2 lit .. . 1.• ,..., 2- , ,••• .__ _ - 1. 47r----------- - -- --- (' `i :z..,,....(. -. '---..' 7,7 / -A-- . , . - .. II A'\>- ■ .----- - - --- ---,.. 7-140.! / --\ / 1 / 72ND AVENUE ACCESS TO BORDERS BOOKSTORE/TRI-MET PARK& RIDE/VILLAGE INN FIGURE 1 AND PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1 TUALATIN, OREGON .--, ..) r KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. , K TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING . Transportation Impact Analysis Bridgeport Village Tualatin, Oregon May 2003 Transportation Impact Analysis Bridgeport Village Tualatin, Oregon Prepared For: City of Tualatin 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue, Suite 1130 Tualatin, OR 97062 (503) 692-2000 Prepared By: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 228-5230 • Project Manager: Mark Vandehey Project Principal: Julia Kuhn Project Analyst: Matt Hughart Project No. 4845.01 ' � May 2003 <RE3 PR0,4z• NG1NE6' 2 15,7L/ 7 OREGON • P. T7,14Q�-� q• VANO \ EXPIRES: 6/30/o4 I 1 May 2003 Bridgeport Village Table of Contents Table of Contents ,ection 1 Table of Contents i Section 2 Executive Summary 2 Section 3 Introduction 5 Section 4 Existing Conditions 10 Section 5 Traffic Impact Analysis 18 Section 6 Conclusions and Recommendations 32 Section 7 References 35 Appendix A Traffic Count Data Appendix B - Description of Level-of-Service Methods and Criteria Appendix C 2003 Existing Conditions Operational Analysis Worksheets . Appendix D Year 2005 Background Traffic Operational Analysis Worksheets endix E Year 2005 Total Traffic Operational Analysis Worksheets Appendix F 95`11 Percentile Queue Length Calculation Worksheets Appendix G Year 2005 Total Traffic Operational Analysis Worksheets, Assuming a SW Findlay Road Connection Kittelson&Associates,inc. May 2003 Bridgeport Village Table of Contents List of Figures x figure 1 Site Vicinity Map 6 Figure 2 Proposed Site Plan 7 Figure 3 Aerial View of the Site Vicinity 11 Figure 4 Existing Lane Configurations and Traffic Control Devices 12 Figure 5 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour 15 Figure 6 2005 Background Traffic Conditions,Weekday PM Peak Hour 19 Figure 7 Development Based Planned Transportation Improvements, Lane Configurations and Traffic Control Devices 21 • Figure 8 Estimated Trip Distribution Pattern 24 Figure 9 Site-Generated Traffic Volumes, Weekday PM Peak Hour 25 Figure 10 2005 Total Traffic Conditions,Weekday PM Peak Hour 26 ire 11 2005 Total Traffic Conditions with Findlay Street Connection, Weekday PM Peak Hour 30 Kittelson&Associates,Inc. li May 2003 Bridgeport Village Table of Contents List of Tables cable 1 Existing Transportation Facilities and Roadway Designations 13 Table 2 Estimated Trip Generation 22 Table 3 Estimated 95th Percentile Queue Lengths 27 Table 4 Comparison of Weekday PM Peak Hour Operations with and without a Findlay Road Connection 28 Kittelson&Associates,Inc. !f! • Section 1 Executive Summary Bridgeport Village May 2003 Executive Summary Opus Northwest and Center Oak Properties are proposing to develop a mixed-use retail and office project on the site of the former Durham Quarry in Tualatin, Oregon. This site, which is located in the northwest quadrant of the SW Lower Boones Ferry Road / SW Bridgeport Road / SW 72nd Avenue intersection, is currently vacant. Upon completion, the site is proposed to consist of an assortment of high-end retail, entertainment, and office space totaling approximately 685,000 square feet. The development is proposed to have a total of three public access driveways located off of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bridgeport Road. With development approval, construction is anticipated to begin in late 2003 and be fully built out and occupied by 2005. The findings of the intersection operational analysis documented in this study are summarized below. FINDINGS Existing Conditions • Traffic operations at the study area intersections were found to be acceptable during the critical weekday p.m. peak hour time period based on the operating standards set forth by the agencies that own and operate the transportation facilities within the study area. • Although the individual intersection performance currently meet minimum operating standards, traffic flow within the vicinity of the I-5/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road -- interchange currently experiences significant congestion during the weekday p.m. peak hour time period, particularly so between the I-5 southbound ramp terminal and the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Bridgeport Road intersection. This is attributable to insufficient spacing between the two intersections. Year 2005 Background Traffic Conditions • Year 2005 background traffic conditions (without development of the Bridgeport Village) were estimated assuming two years of continued local and regional growth from the existing conditions. • Traffic operations at the study area intersections were found to be acceptable during the critical weekday p.m. peak hour time period. • With no improvements to the I-5/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road interchange, traffic flow would experience a further increase in congestion based on the previously described intersection spacing deficiency. Proposed Development Activities • The proposed Bridgeport Village development, with the build-out assumptions incorporated in this study is estimated to generate approximately 1,680 (780 in, 900 out) net new trip ends during the weekday p.m. peak hour time period. • Public access to the site is proposed via SW Bridgeport Road and a realigned SW 72nd Avenue. At the request of the City of Tualatin, a potential access to SW Findlay Road was also evaluated. p Executive Summary 12 KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING?RAFFIC ENGINEERII Bridgeport Village May 2003 Planned Transportation Improvements • To address the previously discussed operational problems within the vicinity of the I-5 Interchange and in anticipation of a significant increase in traffic resulting from the Bridgeport Village project, several significant improvements to the transportation system within the I-5 interchange are planned with an estimated cost of approximately$7,000,000. • The improvements will be constructed prior to occupancy of the Bridgeport Village project. In addition to significantly increasing the capacity of the intersections within the vicinity of the interchange, the improvements will increase the spacing between spacing between the I-5 southbound ramp terminal and the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Bridgeport Road intersection. Year 2005 Total Traffic Conditions: • The year 2005 total traffic conditions (with the added traffic from the Bridgeport Village project) assume the completion of the proposed transportation improvements. • With the anticipated transportation system improvements, traffic operations at the study area intersections were found to be acceptable during the critical weekday p.m. peak hour time period based on the operating standards set forth by the review agencies. • Upon build-out,of the Bridgeport Village, traffic signals will be warranted at the two site access driveways on SW Bridgeport Road and the site access driveway on SW 72nd Avenue. All of these intersections serve development and/or public streets on the intersection legs that are opposite the development. • The forecast 95` percentile queues at the key study intersections during the weekday p.m. peak hour can be accommodated within the planned lane storage lengths. • Although an unrestricted vehicular connection of SW Findlay Road is not essential for the Bridgeport Village development, there are a number of benefits and disadvantages that warrant consideration to determine when and if this connection is appropriate. If it is determined that pedestrian, bicycle, and emergency access is acceptable at this time to the reviewing jurisdictions, it is recommended that the site plan incorporate the flexibility to provide the potential for a full vehicular connection at some point in the future. RECOMMENDATIONS • Prior to occupancy of the Bridgeport Village, transportation improvements consistent with the conceptual improvement plan identified in Figure 7 of this report should be constructed. • New traffic signals should be installed at the two site accesses on SW Bridgeport Road and at the site access on SW 72nd Avenue. KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES, INC. Executive Summary 13 K TRANSP ORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERII E x b 1' 7; Village Inn Storm Report Project 3104 LV Water Quality 11/19/03 V � DESIGN GROUP INC • Description: The following calculation is based on Clean Water Service's design guidelines for water quality treatement. A treatment flow is determined based upon a 4 hour storm event with 0.36 inch of rainfall over the impervious surface areas. This flow is then used to size the applicable treatment device. In this case,we have selected Stormfilter,which is manufactured by Stormwater Management, Inc. Each stormfilter cartridge can handle 15 gallons of stormwater per minute. In this instance, a stormfilter unit consisting of 4 cartridges is needed to meet the requirements of Clean Water Services. Please see calculation below. Water Quality Village Inn = 1.2 acres of impervious surface Area WQ Volume (CO = 0.36 in x Impervios Area (sf) 12 (in/ft) Water Quality WQ Flow(cfs) _ WQ Volume(cf) Flow (4 hr)(60 min/hr)(60 sec/min) Impervios Area (sf) 480,000 sec/ft _ 1.2ac x 43,560 sf/ac 480,000 sec/ft = 0.11 cfs • = 49 gpm Stormwater Filters = 49gpm/ 15 gpm per cartridge = 4 Cartridges Required �� 10/29/03 08:28 FAX 5038453527 CLEAN WATER SERVICES Vc�lbl f g IZ1001 L'HTN C1eanWa er Services OCT 2 0 2003 UJj Our commitment is clear. Ale Number 352 f J By. ensltive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment Jurisdiction =~�=�= 1Va(,GI',�,v�� Date QG-I-, 2 p , 2003 Map &Tax Lot 2 = !I 3 • C. 004- Owner O•U s Site Address /� Careac4.cL,) L /�L • �A Contact �, . f A-_ L-0 Proposed Activity te.,-1- j a.A.A.d 14..0 Address deAre-tilo.1,-g-14+- zst!-'617-`-LL:) )-4c4 zo Phone 7w , O R `'72OS • • Official use only below this fine Y N NA Y N NA ❑ Sensitive Area Composite Map n Stormwater Infrastructure maps Map# 2 _51 wh QS s.2 Y N NA Y N NA ❑ ❑ [0 Locally adopted studies or maps ❑ ❑ ,4 Other Specify Specify Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 00-7: Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. [i Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site. This re- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. I I The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: Reviewed By Date: /op-V0-3 Post-it°Fax Note 7671 r;11'/04/4/03 I a of To .2u i 0, From I�a9eS / Returned to applicant `' Mail Fax 1 Counter co iocP: _ ���o co. 6c4JS Date iq gya3 By Phone# Phone 10/28/2003 15:32 5036829505 KELLER DROP BOX PAGE 01 Keller DROP Box United Disposal Service, Inc. Phone: 503.635.4463 - °Leung 10295 S.W. Ridder Road Suite 2 Fax: 503.682.9505 ►,10:� ; !!.! Wilsonville, OR 97070 emai I:kellerdrop®aol.com Opus Northwest LLC 1000 SW Broadway Suite#1130 Portland OR 97205 Dear Mike Nichols: This letter is in regards to the request for approval of the waste management plan for the Village Inn site in question. I have reviewed the requirements and feel this plan should accommodate our trucks for servicing your waste and recycling needs for all compactors and enclosures. If any questions,please contact Brian Tietsort. Thank you, Brian A. Tietsort Operations Manager United Disposal Service, Inc. &Keller Drop Box 4• exIllist- EXHIBIT 9 IMPACT STUDY In order to develop the proposed improvements within the City of Tigard,the applicant is requesting the following approvals from the City of Tigard: Type II Site Development Review approval for both new development and a major modification of existing development: • A small amount of on-site parking(all or a portion of 6 parking spaces)and 837 square feet of landscaping for a proposed new Village Inn restaurant,which is located in the City of Tualatin; and • New access drive serving the existing retail on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700(Borders Bookstore), the Tri-Met Park&Ride lot and the proposed new restaurant. This is a Major Modification to the access to Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700 pursuant to Section 18.360.050; Approval for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards for: • An adjustment to the access spacing standards to retain the existing southerly access to the retail uses on Tax Lot 2S113AD-01700(Borders Bookstore)as a right-in/right-out limited access. This impact study quantifies the effect of the proposed development on public facilities and services in the City of Tigard.The study addresses: • The transportation system, including bikeways, • The drainage system, • The parks system, • The water system, • The sewer system,and • The noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact,the study proposes improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large,public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests,the applicant has either specifically concurred with the dedication requirements, or provided evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Transportation System As described in the Traffic Impact Analysis [Exhibit 6],the placement of the proposed access was identified in collaboration with Oregon Department of Transportation(ODOT),Washington County, City of Tualatin,and City of Tigard staff as part of the overall transportation improvement program for the larger Bridgeport Village development(which included the new Village Inn site)to ensure optimal traffic operations along SW Bridgeport Road, SW 72id Avenue,and at the Interstate 5/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road interchange while still providing access to the existing businesses within the study area. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review November 24,2003 Drainage System As described in the Drainage Report [Exhibit 7],all stormwater runoff from the site will be collected onsite with lynch-style catch basins and directed to an approved water quality device.From here the treated runoff will be included in the proposed stormwater system in proposed SW 72nd Avenue. At the present time,David Evans and Associates is designing this system concurrently with the improvements to 72nd. Parks System There will be no loss of park lands as a result of this development. There are no changes proposed to the existing structures and there are no new buildings proposed within the City of Tigard as part of this application; therefore,there are no impacts to the park system expected as a result of increased demand associated with this development. Water System There are no changes proposed to the existing structures and there are no new buildings proposed within the City of Tigard,nor are there any changes proposed to the existing water system infrastructure as part of this application. Other than minor irrigation improvements for the proposed areas of new landscaping, there is no new demand on the water system expected as a result of this development. Easements to protect existing water utility facilities on-site will be provided. Sewer System There are no changes proposed to the existing structures and there are no new buildings proposed within the City of Tigard,nor are there changes proposed to the existing sewer system infrastructure as part of this application. There is no new demand on the sewer system expected as a result of this development. Easements to protect existing sewer utility facilities on-site will be provided. Noise Impacts There are no changes proposed to the existing noise levels as part of this application;therefore,there are no noise impacts expected as a result of this development. City of Tigard Access Modification/Village Inn Application for Site Development Review November 24,2003 e_)(11 ;1913- IC: .. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING. . OSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE:APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A CQI '; F THE E NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT:PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT tTHE SAME-TIME PROPERTY . OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE, TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: :'-7'.::. • . . ty of Tiga anning'"Divisio� r•F4 i► C (� rd`PI . .. I Hall 13 5 SW H 'ry•:: Tigard, 97223-8189 _ `I•OR 923 IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAV *`;COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT,THE TIME OF APPLICATION MAILING: II il I. M �_ 0-y/(/55 being duly sworn, depose and say that on the day of___A2QlLlzim_le-d, II 20 .7 ' , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed !I development at (or near) / , &&oo ,$,.,� 7���-u a,._.__e___, of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. a copy f I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly a dressed to s id p sons and were deposited on the I( date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at }nI v- v I � c 2--i / �O�6 i� , 11 with postage prepaid thereon. / F, ti qt Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) POSTIN G: A1 / / ii I, iqi G'`6(2,/ /VI c-r/ 0 ` 5 , do affirm that I am (represent) the �l� USA 4 G�i o ( p ) party initiating interest in a proposed � affecting the land located at (stat the approximate location(s) IF no 1 address(s) and/or tpx lot(s) currently registered) j so 00 o 5 4 72^- II-02 L. a and did on the 7- day of N0V 1E01 get , 20 03 personally post notice indicating that the site may be prom d for a ere )c' "�Ec-oPi I E.A RF)iFc.-1 application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to di . the proposal. / p The sign was posted at One s.�. C o2nJEjL VF 7 o20c/'LS 0 0 f25-r- 7 fm. ,vc• 4-67-.1 (state location you posted notice on property) f --7,--t—e-:/ . / i Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF -tScP-' ) :ounty of 1-16--1-- ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 75, day of A/c ",,,,_ 20 03 . I s•34r, OFFICIAL SEAL €`r KAREN SIEGEL NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON i ` ,� COMMISSION NO.335287 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 5,2004 r<a"-2,v--) • • a_s_ t NOTARY PUBLIC OF . 'EGON My Commission Expires: csi u,,,.,_ 5, ZOO y I kp c, please complete the information below: IAN.._.3F PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: /9Gf_F n SS !" '<J-1V(-9 f�r /4 P3 7, ' YPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: 4.a L p �iw-' s i_ a , i-. , ,ddress or General Location of Subject Property: /61.8hoo �StO 7'd-"'` /1-t.r ubject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): az 5 (( A Ai) - CSI inn i h:Uogin\pattyMtasterslaffidavit of mailing-posting neighborhood meeting.doc • ANGELO<' EATON s Associate s i20 S` .ain Suite 201 Tel: 503.224.6974 on Jregon 97205 Fax: 503.227. 3679 November 7, 2003 Dear Interested Party: RE: New Access for 16800 SW 72"d Avenue and Access and Parking for New Village Inn Restaurant— Neighborhood Meeting Angelo Eaton & Associates is representing the developer of the properties located at 16800 SW 72nd Avenue (2S113AD-01700). We are considering proposing a new access to serve the existing retail at 16800 SW 72nd Avenue (Borders Bookstore), the Tri-Met Park & Ride lot and a proposed new Village Inn restaurant. The new Village Inn restaurant will be located primarily in the City of Tualatin; however, we are considering proposing to locate a portion of its new parking area (approximately five spaces) at this location within the City of Tigard. We are also considering proposing an adjustment to the access spacing standards to retain an existing access to the retail site as a right- in/right-out limited access. This proposal will be subject to Site Development Review. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Tigard Fire Station#51 Community Room (entrance on south side of building) 8935 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503) 227-3673 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 44444.,1/4. Cosiedike Catherine Corliss Project Planner Land Use Planning ♦ Transportation Planning • Project Management Neighborhood Meeting Invitation A NG E LO<' EATON November7, 2003 &nssociates Page 2 VICINITY MAP New Access for 16800 SW 72nd Avenue and Access and Parking for New Village Inn Restaurant #14 j II Rill j 1 .x. 1 j,% -/i/ j a Ti.ard ,. Tualatin N WWEIOONE PM 4 if 4 • Land Use Planning ♦ Transportation Planning • Project Management T-- + a."r+ z ' - I '...,.- ' w.,ireik+�ey>.li aWyera«.�rr•y iti n.ri , " a -1. N.t--r .a,Y� . '�� i� = . ;L =i I .,M NEIGHBORHOOD: ON,CERN4. , 1,.a- �: : ,,ys =E ,�, iY` 67fir: 4 , ay . 44 403xr` , ,,, z, 1 ,. , y .. 4._1,._;, ,,, .S;' ,k.,,, t'r',:,&.: .k 4 ;,-;,- ftL; ,. QUESTIONS , O ASKTO MQ! URE;,:OUR coNCERNS i RE MEx .,,, � cta T ollowing is a list of questions developed by a subgroup of the Citizen Involvement Team. These ci ,tions are intended to aid you in formulating your own questions for proposed development in your area. Feel free to ask more or alter the questions to address your own unique concerns and interests. PROCESS • What applications are you (the developer) applying for? When do you expect to submit the application(s) so that neighbors can review it? What changes or additions are expected prior to submittal? • Will the decision on the application be made by City Staff, Hearings Officer, Planning Commission or City Council? How long is the process? (timing)! • At what point in the process are citizens given notice and the opportunity to provide input? • Has a pre-application conference been held with City of Tigard Staff? ✓ Have any preliminary requirements been addressed or have any critical issues been identified? ✓ What City Planner did you speak with regarding this project? (This person is generally the Planner assigned to the land use case and the one to contact for additional information). STREETS • Will there be a traffic study done? What are the preliminary traffic impacts anticipated as a result of the development and how do you propose to mitigate the impacts if necessary? • at street improvements (including sidewalks) are proposed? What connections to existing streets .e proposed? . • Are streets proposed to be public or private? What are the proposed street and sidewalk widths? • What are the emergency access requirements and what is proposed to meet those requirements? TONING AND DENSITY • What is the current zoning? What uses are allowed under this zoning? • Will there be a re-zone requested by the developer? If yes, to what zone? • • How many units are proposed for the development and what is the minimum and maximum density allowed in the zone? )RAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ■ What is your erosion control and drainage plan What is the natural slope of the property? What are 1 the grading plans? < ■ Is there a water quality facility planned within the development and where will it be located? Who will own and maintain the facility? REES AND LANDSCAPING \' t are the tree removal plans and what is proposed to mitigate for trees removed? Y nat are the landscaping plans? What buffering or fencing is required and/or proposed? 1 4 FREQUENTLY ASKED '4 City of Tigard NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING QUESTIONS 5 Community Commnt What Is The Purpose Of This Neighborhood Meeting? The purpose of the meeting is to allow the prospective developer to share with you what they are planning to do. This is your opportunity to become informed of their proposed development and to let them know what issues or concerns you have in regard to their proposal. What Happens After The Neighborhood Meeting? After the neighborhood meeting, the prospective developer finalizes their submittal package (often taking into account citizen concerns) and submits an application to the City. Sometimes it takes a while before the developer's application is ready to submit, so there could be several months between the neighborhood meeting and the submittal of an application. Once an application is submitted to the City, Staff reviews it for completeness. Once an application has been deemed complete, the formal application review begins. It takes approximately 6-8 weeks from the time the application is accepted for a decision to be made. Many types of applications require a public hearing at which citizens are given the opportunity to provide comments or concerns. For all types of applications, property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels receive notice of public hearing (if applicable), notice of the decision, and are given the opportunity to appeal the ..vision. What If The Proposal Presented At The Neighborhood Meeting Is Not What Is Actually Submitted? Applicants are not required to submit exactly what was presented at the neighborhood meeting if it generally follows the type of development proposed. This provides for the opportunity to address the neighborhood issues and address other changes necessitated by the development or staff. If the project is entirely different, a new neighborhood meeting would be required. In any case, notice of decision is sent to property owners within 500 feet of the proposed development allowing them the opportunity to appeal. How Do I Know What Issues Are Valid? A decision is reviewed based on compliance with the Tigard Development Code. Review the development code to familiarize yourself with what is permitted and what may not be permitted. A copy of the development code is available for viewing at the Tigard City Library or a copy may be purchased at the Community Development Services counter. You may also contact City Planning staff and ask what the standards are for a specific issue. Be prepared, however, that you may not LIKE all the standards, but at least you know what they are. If a development meets the code standards, it can proceed. [lr i � es {0 S tizen n at em n m.4 11 as o g i ed i ei l fu o r Skye II 01.1,51 r,,.. ..f.,.s=i,. y _g�}2 � ��r;' �'+y sY 7i �f ?i ;"1.. `.`r''3.. :'c*� " rx:'Crticd ,+ S'� :z=",--- �- r ou n,Ieterminln, � our 9s1 IF one Iar ar ilsosa�e o (owing ee isfs. os Ages Ions:‘ ri, , i:1cu rpl n\j u lia\citi nfo2.doc TONIGHT Neighborhood Meeting New Access for 16800 SW 72nd Avenue and Access and Parking for New `tillage Inn Restaurant Monday, November 24, 2003 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Tigard Fire Station #51 Community Room (entrance on south side of building) 8935 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon MEETING SUMMARY Site Development Review Application Neighborhood Meeting for New Access for 16800 SW 72nd Avenue and Access and Parking for New Village Inn Restaurant The applicant held a neighborhood meeting pursuant to the requirements of the City of Tigard. The meeting was held Monday, November 24, 2003 from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at the Community Room of Tigard Fire Station #51, 8935 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon. The applicant was represented by Mike Nichols and Bruce Wood of Opus Northwest and Cathy Corliss of Angelo Eaton & Associates. No one from the public attended. Nov 25 03 09: 31a Rnr ' o Eatane.Associates 50' °27-3679 P • 2 / SIGN-IN SHEET Neighborhood Meeting for New Access for 16800 SW 72nd Avenue and Access and Parking for New Village Inn Restaurant, Monday, November 24,2003 from 5:30 p.m.to 7:30 p.m. Name ,_ Telephone and/or Email (optional) kei f r s ')qtr, aa3 M r 0 �, /4 i 0 5 14. .6 4 1 PAk ■.>c.tJ own --Q-,i € a--,te es. Corff Y C?ILL/ss .. c..avi r Pa✓kr...41 0(q 7$0n ,Q24C.0 GJU(ii du.Z7 t/3u) ra-" .5 c.) Q/(,GUnaol r ,CIA S 1 1 Pc,_44-JAIr (J 7 8 I 0 1 0� 9 l 1 ! Iw I I COU N I 18 I VIEW I Q N.T.S. 1 4 - - - I - - - I ACRES I :s ti IZ r. I ti I BORDER �, D ir 1 `•,:$ BOOKS c' \61•• 14 13 12 I 11 ■ I ' \tK '"\"' 1 3 NI l /� I I f' a, .1 wfrOir41, . OI OI■4. OI ///////////// '004•4►,i00•Oi 16 .•I��O COI�#s•I,// /// // •'�•Oiii•:•i•�•iiiii: / TIN •QI� OI�NOI� /%////////I�Oi:•:•4:•:•:•:•:•:••O;••O.• R TALA •± ►'P,�,- %///%///; 4.0'e'•:.**i i i'i'4i i , A / U ��V •41,4� ////8/////'I :❖:❖•i•:0:4 •i &•VALLEY a�I;/0// / // API`�OAO•i•Oi•O.O•••••i'••••i4 H OW: j //j%/.I�,Is;I�i'IA:i::: ••'.': :%i RID / C//////%/ 14,.„,'ISO,..:•.:�:�:.:.�:�:.....,i:!�� / \ /;,7;/// 19 144*.•:444:V•�• / \ //////z // *Z:•o!••' / C ///////// O LEGEND: \ // / // / ����eee, O.D-0-T. PUBLIC R/W t//',//////// �� 046'44 TO BE VACATED \ `'j / / / // / Vy Nam STATE ("SURPLUS"?) LAND \ // / / G ....�• TO BE TRANSFERRED \ �0 / / /aa\O gra O.D.O.T. PUBLI CR/W :�:•i 4 / V TO CITY FOR R W �'�� / G TIGARD PUBLIC R/W \ �•�••� / / J Pr TO BE VACATED ••� / / \ ... / / "."/7/ DEDICATED TO BE CITY?) `. or / / / PRIVATE LAND / / ,':i (OPUS TO VILLAGE INN?) ' 6' \/ / ia e.w�nil Prs OPUS NORTHWEST LDC F.ngllannenerss BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE R/W EXCHANGE 2751 1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1130 Surveyors IN THE NE, SE AND SW 1/4 OF SEC. 13, PORTLAND, OR 97205 Design youµInc T. 2S., R. 1W., W.M. (503)916-8963 13:0 .W r„� WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON MIME(502)158-4242 d P 8m,,, 2751RAD�C 11/11W WI ` 1 . CALCULATION/DESIGN RECORD / Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering DATE II/ 7/0 3 PROJECT a N\ Baltimore•Ft. Lauderdale•Orlando•Portland http://www.kittelson.com PROJECT NAME SUBJECT A f ._�/=^c' /_,/ 1- BY SHEET# OF /VC,,--t AssaCPq / NU . e - 001 /!erts 7,, ( K11! (5-C3) Z FI 5-2 3o Sf)u IC i&kG� DQ,(ja TOmS C -Ij ot1uatc 0 o (-pot(--22o(, cijolonsw‘ 0 . 6 ,L3auex- c 4,.' vn4a4 Go , 703- 8 -12 -3q6 5 jAC.v1_ bniry-eCo.Wa5-4r'rrafog-7.or.v: .l s_ ..-- \/C., �t cLR C(II)C.,. 6-1" 9/ b' 4 tc J eb.Lb-e1 -L o Guy kit) c.s X1..1 (.E. G-c -iCMI - 1:) A 77.3-6,44:. LHie b Jham•C,c6 CIAloy 141.4A-xc.l3 LOG 3k0'03Y -0/ 413 itef;v.. f2c .. oru5 5D3 9/b 8%) 2ccr -.zic., wni 0 OPUS Nw,GI,11 At. V GL too °14 946-e.ine 1563-372-36A=:' kk-e-evaAult tteG►,.-DA"t. `J,i■- , iH/QL.--t____ ___"... -a23-- 75 / Li-e- - Ki 11 Gt-ii (_1_A.1 -1toffeD 1t) 2.42. ki aoc.i.-1-tc ird.Dr•.uS Air O r-- ,q31 _ 9( } g Jc iee,'. LI. A;fa� Q, 1 AL+ . SA-- or. vs ANGE LO<' EATON . Associates 620 SW Main Suite t01 Tel: 503.224.6974 Portland,Oregon 97205 Fax: 503.227. 3679 January 26, 2003 RE: Proposed Minor Modifications to the North and South Tri-Met Park-and- Ride Facilities located at the intersection of SW 72"d Avenue and SW Boones Ferry Road in the City of Tualatin (see attached Vicinity Map) Dear Property Owner and/or Interested Party: You are cordially invited to attend a meeting: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Ramada Inn -Meeting Room 17993 SW Lower Boones Ferry Road Tualatin, Oregon This meeting shall be held to discuss a proposed project located to the north and south of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Lower Boones Ferry Road in the City of Tualatin. The proposal is as follows: • North Park-and-Ride Facility: Modifications to this facility resulting from access revisions and the- realignment of SW 72nd Avenue include the loss of approximately four to eight parking spaces and the addition and modification of landscape islands. • South Park-and-Ride Facility: Modifications to this facility resulting from widening and transportation improvements on SW Lower Boones Ferry Road include the changes to the north entry, lot reconfiguration and the addition of approximately 50 parking spaces, and landscape islands, storm drainage and site lighting. This proposal is subject to Architectural Review by the City of Tualatin. The purpose of this meeting is to provide a means for the applicant and surrounding property owners to meet and discuss this proposal and identify any issues regarding this proposal prior to applying to the City of Tualatin for the necessary permits. Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503) 227-3673 if you have any questions. Regards, %3I7 (-d'-Z Catherine Corliss Project Planner Land Use Planning • Transportation Planning • Project Management Neighborhood Meeting Invitation ANGELO<' EATON January 23, 2004 n Acsoctates Page 2 VICINITY MAP Minor Modifications to the North and South Tri-Met Park-and-Ride Facilities located at the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Boones Ferry Road in the City of Tualatin vj //I i , / / III , from VI , ■ r - illl��lllr •111►\� l — Z /: 1!l�1�1 I RD ti i r / North Park-and Ride Facilit V% '- �R ri{ Ifrill.Pw. >01PA •• _. ._. _ D .. of South Park-and-Ride Facilit `� glait - - Ivi VII ow l'OM �� l 40.4/ r `� PS WY ,oG, 4 , I' . AN Wa )1101,,w,,, ry \/. //' . LLlma•- Inn 'F VP;41 7 93 SW Low- :s.rfe .Fer,ry �,.-.4 WR "�cess v a Tra O. 4.,`• 41 4*• 1 1 • — -- um .�. , Vr- 111111 1�OW 1,/if o4 A - -- an. / /A1 :,,- *11-#41/444 imitAm. Land l'se Planning • Translx>rtatinn Planning • Pre sect Management / n CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 7/14/2004 FILE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00017 Type II Land Use Application ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2003-00109 FILE TITLE: VILLAGE INN ACCESS AND PARKING APPLICANT: Bridgeport Village, LLC OWNER: Bridgeport Land, LLC Attn: Bruce Wood, Opus Northwest, LLC Attn: Selwyn Bingham 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1130 3939 NW St. Helens Road Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97210 OWNER: Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 Attn: Roger Hansen, Right-of-Way Supervisor 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct six (6) parking stalls with associated landscaping for the new Village Inn Restaurant and a new access to the existing Boarders Bookstore site. The applicant has also applied for an Adjustment to the Access and Egress standards in order to retain the existing central access to the Boarders Bookstore as a right-in/right-out limited access. LOCATION: 16800 SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 2S113PaD, Tax Lot 1700. Also, the ODOT right-of-way NE of the intersection of SW 72' Avenue and Bridgeport Road. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: MARCH 19, 2004 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: APRIL 2, 2004 HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ._l PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ® STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 29, 2004 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION Z VICINITY MAP ® GRADING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN ® IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN Z DRAINAGE REPORT ® TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE ® TREE PLAN ® OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 2437 'J City of Tualatin o s -ECEIVED PLANNING 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue NOV 2 4 2003 Tualatin, 00062 7092 r�� TDD 503.692.0574l �f- CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF APPLI AT I ' BMITTAL The City of Tualatin Community Development Department -Planning Division has received the following application, which will be reviewed under the limited land use process. You are receiving this notice because County records indicate that you own property within 300-feet of the subject property, you are a neighborhood association recognized by the City of Tualatin with boundaries encompassing the subject property, or you are a government agency. Decision making process: In the limited land use process, the Planning Division mails this Notice of Application Submittal to the applicant, surrounding property owners within 300-feet, affected government agencies and affected neighborhood organizations. Persons wishing to submit comments have 14 calendar days from the day this Notice was mailed to submit their comments to the Community Development Director. Only those persons who submitted written comments within the 14-day period and are adversely affected by the decision will receive a Notice of Decision and have standing to submit a Request for Review of the decision. A Request for Review of a Subdivision, Partition or the Public Facilities portion of an Architectural Review application will be heard by the City Council. An appeal of the Architectural Features of an Architectural Review application will be heard by the Architectural Review Board, with the ARB decision appealable to the City Council. Comments: The deadline for submitting comments on the proposed application is 5:00 p.m. on December 5, 2003, at the Planning Division located at 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue, Tualatin Oregon 97062. Comments must be: (1) made in writing, either by signed letter or fax(e-mails are not acceptable); (2) raise issues with sufficient detail and clarity to enable the decision maker to respond to the issue; and (3) state how you may be adversely affected by the proposal. If you do not submit comments during the comment period, you may not appeal to the Architectural Review Board, City Council, or the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. Request for Review: Only persons who submitted comments within the specified time frame, with sufficient detail and clarity and who indicated how they may be adversely affected by the Notice of Decision made by the Community Development Director, may complete a Request for Review form. A Request for Review must be made on the proper form obtainable at the Tualatin Library or the Planning Division. Failure to raise an issue in writing, by signed letter or fax, or failure to provide sufficient detail and clarity to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes the raising of the issue at a subsequent time on appeal or before the Land Use Board of Appeals. A request for review hearing is de novo. All requests of review are first heard by the City Council, except for the Architectural Features of a staff Architectural Review decision. The Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals hears appeals of City Council decisions. Application Material: Copies of all materials submitted by the applicant are available for review at no cost at the City of Tualatin Planning Division. Copies of application materials may be obtained at cost. The application materials are also available at the Tualatin Library. Contact: Will Harper at 503-691-3027. File: AR-03-16 ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO PROVIDE THESE MATERIALS IN ALTERNATIVE FORMATS, SUCH AS LARGE TYPE OR AUDIO CASSETTE TAPE. PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AND ALLOW AS MUCH LEAD TIME AS POSSIBLE. I p I / Il •LHnirt1 P Elm 1.1 IN loam.[ tj Durham i wiiimult 1,.. i op Mk,. tV A ,s•A .0.0‘ as ., i---1-1, S 4�' - - ■ SITE ______ 1...A.L 11.41;;�I� ..rem I I�1 ff iiiiIa'►1 , A ,„„, ni. 2.4 4f4 si way a., I__1' / ism :111116 non. al:4'è$ CYIIJ . III Es Aro= itivi . �V�, , .0 NA En s1 , • Le' ��• �� ..i. ...,.. _ .■■■ ,, . � ..%/11/11�>IIIIIIIII / 44.1lIuvIIIU! I La �� �� ■.■■..r q1 i.11lt!!!!!! !11 I.--,., w■il S ie ." ru mum tit viliaailant C� �' i. 1 S' b ��4 Vass in mas•b.. i!r gi si I I ) . les Nur �� ..�_: RI. IlIR i ril !�■ 111 1111�/.,il�!! :limn I :!!! I 4riA; :111!!1x■■ ■■ ■■ ■ ; ■■■■(LIU PA41 J��.■■ :■ ■■ ■ !! fig= ■■.1!!!!i� ■ Ii iii �U m ■si 1y' .+ �� r■■ ■■ ■■ ■ IN arm mis CITY OF TUALATIN VICINITY MAP CITY OF TUALATIN RECEIVED 1 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW SCALE: 1"=900' OCT 2 9 2003 tit SUBMITTAL Clio COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT soiATE PLANNING DIVISION :8-103 /6 Architectural Review Che 3t for Commercial, Industrial & Public-Pa 0 APPLICATION FOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Direct Communication to Name: Frank Angelo, Angelo Eaton & Assoc. Title: Principal Address: 620 SW Main Suite 201 E-mail address: Portland, OR 97205 fangeloeaton @angeloeaton.com Phone Number: 503-227-3664 Fax Number: 503-227-3679 Applicant's Name: Bridgeport Village LLC E-mail address: bruce.wood @opusnw.com Address: Opus NW 1000 SW Broadway Suite 1130 Portland OR, 97205 Phone Number: 503-916-89 3 Fax Number: 503-916-8964 Applicant's Signature: Date: to.1...9,07 Property Owner's Na 1 Phone Number: Address: See attached property owner authorizations Property Owner's Signature: Date: (NOTE: Letter of authorization is required if not signed by owner.) Architect: Joseph Van Lom E-mail address: vanlom @vanlom.com Address: 34 NW First, Suite 309 Portland, OR 97209 Phone Number: 503-226-0590 Fax Number: 503-273-8649 Landscape Architect: Christopher Freshley E-mail address: freshley @msn.com Address: 1020 SW Taylor, #355 Portland, OR 97205 Phone Number: 503-222-9881 Fax Number: 503-224-7069 Engineer: Frederick Holz, P.E. E-mail address: holzf @Idcdesign.com Address: LDC Design Group 3300 NW 211th Terrace, Hillsboro, OR 97124 Phone Number: 503-858-4242 Fax Number: 503-645-5500 Project Title: Village Inn Project Address: r76r7o SW-72,1 , km. Brief Project Description: New Village Inn restaurant CITY OF TUALATIN RECEIVED Proposed Use: Restaurant OCT 2 9 2003 VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS: Approximately $1 Million COMP ANNING QIV SOIONENT AS THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION ABOVE, ON THE FACT SHEET AND THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNER MAILING LIST IS CORRECT. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITHALL APPLICABLE CITY AND COUNTY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND LAND USE. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE GQ€/Ci DATE (O•Zl•o3 Case No. 'I 4, Date Received/1_40g/a3 Application Complete as of Received by /J'2 , / ecei t No. ARB hearing date(if applicable) JA Fee:complete revil.w(.60-$2635) is 1 °- Posting verification (� 15 copies of drawings (folded) v 1 reproducible 81/2X 11"site, grading, LS, Public Facilities plan 1 reproducible 8'/2 X 11 vicinity map 1....--- Architectural Review Checklist for Commercial, Industrial & Public-Page 11 GENERAL INFORMATION Site Address: Intersection of SW Bridgeport Rd & SW 72nd Ave Assessor's Man and Tax Lot#: ODOT right-of-way and 2S113DB00100 Planning District: CG w/MUCOD (Tualatin) Parcel Size: 52,282 sq. ft. development area of this application. Property Owner: Washington County, ODOT, Selwyn Bingham Applicant: Bridgeport Village LLC Proposed Use: Restaurant ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DETAILS 1 Residential X Commercial E Industrial Number of parking spaces: 80 spaces Square footage of building: 5,794 sq. ft. Square footage of landscaping: 13,588 sq. ft. Square footage of paving: 32,900 sq. ft. Proposed density (for residential: N/A 1 For City Personnel to complete: Type of case and file number: ArriAlteL uriA telAJ Staff contact person:ttl1‘ta'Ai G+rlCf 5o3-1241 1-3cL1 Proposal: /�GJl*N1'4I t- GAk` t �-f� n& S? �T New �.�s11141 Sri -Mec Pace 4..1D Z►c t. 64or!-I) Decision criteria: -rs S^]I S tA 1-131-74,—) 5 CITY OF TUALATIN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 1st SUBMITTAL CITY OF TUALATIN //jZ-Q,3-/4 RECEIVED OCT 2 9 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION Architectural Review Checklist for Commercial, Industrial & Public -Page 13 CITY OF TUALATIN FACT SHEET General Proposed use: Restaurant Site area: 1.2 acres Building footprint: 5,794 sq.ft. Development area: 1.2 acres Paved Area: 32,900 sq.ft. 52,282 Sq.ft. Development area coverage: 76 Parking Spaces required (see TDC 73.400) Spaces provided: (example: warehouse @ 0.3/1000 GFA) Total parking provided: 80 spaces 5794 @ 10_/1000 GFA= 58 Standard = 56 spaces (including 3 carpool) _@_/1000 GFA= Handicapped accessible = 3 spaces _@ /1000 GFA= Compact=21 spaces Total parking required: 58 spaces Loading berths = 1 berth* Handicapped accessible = 3 Van pool = 3 *Not Included In Total Compact= (max. 35% allowed)= 20 spaces Loading berths = 1 Bicycles Spaces required: 6 Spaces provided: 6 Covered spaces required: 2 Covered spaces provided: 2 Landscaping ** Landscaping required: 10 % of dvpt. Area Landscaping provided: 35% of dvpt. area MUCOD 1,901 Square Feet 6,648 Square Feet Landscaped parking island area required: Landscaped parking island area provided: MUCOD & CG 2,000 Square Feet 3,625 Square Feet Trash and recycling facility Minimum standard method: 58 square feet required 390 square feet provided Other method: square feet For commercial/industrial projects only Total building area: 5,794 sq.ft. 2nd floor: 0 sq.ft. Main fool: 5,794 sq. ft. 3`d floor: 0 sq. ft. Mezzanine: 0 sq. ft. 4th floor: 0 sq. ft. For residential projects only Number of buildings: Total sq. ft. of buildings: sq. ft. Building stories: ** Landscaping required in CG: 15% of dvpt area CITY OF TUALATIN 4,991 sq. ft. required RECEIVED Landscaping provided in CG 21% of dvpt area OCT 2 9 2003 6,940 sq. ft. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION APPLICANT/DEVELOPER VILLAGE INN /+. BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE,LL.C. 1 OPUS 1000 S.W.BROADWAY,SUITE]130 J PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 (503)916-8963 SECTION 13,T.2S,R. 1W Cy jv �F TUALATI CONTACT:MIKE NICHOLS FiECE�VEfl ��„AT T VICORP RESTAURANT,INC. �yvl{, P (VILLAGE INN) ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPLICATION 400W T40ThAVENUE OCT 2 9 2003 RESTAURANTS, INC. DENVER,COLORADO 80216 PREPARED FOR: (303)296-H21 CONTACT:DANNY GRESHAM CITY OF TUALATIN, OREGON 5 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK PROPERTIES,L.L.C. PLANNING p1V1SI0N 649 N.W.12TH STREET OCTOBER 2003 GRESHAM,OREGON 97030 (503)666-1233 CONTACT:JEAN PAUL WARDY _,ti., .., SURVEYORJENGINEER Q.,DC 0 4 - EXHIBITS (503) DESIGN GROUP,INC. CONTACT:FRED HOIZ,P.E. - I VICINITY MAP 2A SITE PLAN TRAFFIC CONSULTANT 3A GRADING PLAN 3B BRIDGEPORT TREE REMOVAL PLAN(APPROVED) KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. 610 S.W.ALDER,SUITE 700 4B 4A PROPOSED BUILT ENVIRONMENT ONMENT KIWELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 4C PROPOSED STREETS&PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS (503)226-0590 KITTELSONASSOCIA ES INC. CONTACT:MARK VANDEFEY,P.E. 5 LANDSCAPE PLAN t/ •:.!'.4JJ A►�:°P, " 6 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS AND r Durham �'/I , a "'',,,,,„•a�av' COIARMATEIt1ALSBOARDS ARCHITECT . �. y ,� {�.�:o 6 APZ ARCHITECTS VAN LOM&COMPANY I(!. I. P.'.$=_ ® !■f- 9• ARCHITECTS VANL:ML:COM2t.NY 34N.W.1ST AVENUE,SUITE 309 A•• ; 1 PORTLAND,OREGON 97209 �-��a Ian I! 1���a { CONTACT:JOSEPH VAN LOM,A.I.A. 'NEM11"1JI— / I' ��IIII.I4/11 PLANNING .� ;••:•c:•. ♦• /�•;_ ANGELO EATON&ASSOCIATES ,,,, r� 40' nnnun inI/i..a1 3 ANGELO<'EATON 620 sW MAIN STREET suns 201 !icl: , • , j� s:...s: ,�.�,� PORT(AND OREGON 97205 .",1 •• ••:::es �' �•- ... (503)227-3673 l•Lo /. r`.�� ...:%...s. _il CONTACT:CATHY CORLISS 1 vg sIIBTI�II::; ' _► =�i�:u ,;r LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT �$ . 4 Jt..........:I:� �'el .�:, rr,:W;_,, �_" CITY OF TUALATIN .. CHRISTOPHER FRESHLEY CHRISTOPHER FRESHLEY 1 \\ I J /J • "-z■•••= a LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1020 SW TAYLOR,SUITE 355 PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 VICINITY MAP = ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (503)222-9881 t CONTACT:CHRISTOPHER FRESHLEY SCALE:1"-900' ® 1st SUBMITTAL 4k -03-,ib .4 , \ / I O! _ . \ ▪ I R r GENERAL NOTES .v!� /! \` 1 _ , .. ,(„ VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT(5194 GROSS 5Q FT} CITY �F TUAIATlN - : ; �,�, ,. P< E o :.(�� 55)• • __ f -_SEt.1 Ave, Olv.'—� 0 HL PAKKING SPACES. 3 (411) -_—_—_—_ 1 STANDARD PARKING SPACES:56(l0%) COMPACT PARKING SPACES: 11 (26L) ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW ' Nokti; , / _ - '�__ TOTAL PARKING SPACER PROVIDED:EO 1st �UMITTAL /0. � ` ; - =- — _-•44 , 4, / 0 .440. f 5... I g, /›., \Z\• ,/,'r - '''' d „ ,/ ��: CITY OF TUALATIN \ prgi it/ ' •.O w.=.�,. i �.. • /; ;' RECEIVED 7 r • .c / / ' /M■•o• ! 11,..1,:gpi.,..r� \. \O l��' OCT 2 9 2003 at r•��y:r�c�,r_, , .i. ,E Imo/ /1/ /•:ii.`;•:r- 1 +� ►� I �i. ;tip ` i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT •_ fI L PLANNING DIVISION f !1 Jew<'���?;���E � �.� u I � / ./ / ,I Lam. '- .'•oI.• to ,eLaa. rx r _ "' — ='' 1 i I; '..47.-44"11;i\1W,::60,0001.- 1.15150-ii,,.. ..imiwzr it / i•r•.yr; S,,,,}&.1. d i' •. ! -_ . ` *4�i'��, `'� ifs w.aa¢: 'awl,' / jyt= : �' /\OPRELIMINARY SITE PLAN- N s N . ! - /�� - 1 I i s 1:- .7.1:160-. + 111 / : A1►, - MR 10/27/03 %\ oi'us PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN °N ♦ VILLAGE INN MET LA v wwN.e....rw h .WHIM - war.0.. r -....... ' \ I -a� CITY O� T19>>4ATIN RECEIVO / �' i `, 9 2003 =;� 11.; OCT 2 F-- 1ss ELOPMENT Q Q , ` - - _ ----- --- " . COMMUNITY DEV M , // ; ,, V, ; It i ."`"°�"w"_' PLANNING DIVISION .-K ON 9R. F..- r _ CITY OF TKIARD �p 0,,,,,,,,_� A /'' ►` *�Y� +fal F,— OF TuALATTI "I 49 • ' a L H�►.'', . " , O ( / ` ',�-" y �p / ��/ , r•/ �•.. EOSINS VALVE BOXES k COVERS.our( .�/ (2, �I �,� PoYRS.ETC..TO GRADE AS NECESSARY.RFLOVE EIOSINO w Q lei ``. ' 9`fr a ,r. RELOCATE AND CURB AS ` NECESSARY.REMOVE AND/OR r 2 ,,e. RELOCATE OOSTNC ul tln STRUCTURES As NECESSARY. r •M•• t/ / MIL S.M�r. �� `,'• \• U l--- : „/ ,� '�lA� ; cam, i %,., ,:z;42.‘ /4,..tt . I , \•:\N\ 8 1.4 .4 . %. .„ , ,illi.„.....,. Y ' '; Tnr°R asN,. /. a,_A7iii \1 1 1; NOTE: .t�,G � ,, I. �tiQ• _ / SEE SEPARATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR i,tt -- . '._. ,I '1 `,' Y J' SW BRIDGEPORT ROAD AND SW 72ND AVENUE. r S I , A ,;1 '}}}Y1yyy 17qg7 p 4R ° r f -471 I I . :•::;:;; 'sir i d ' I% ..1 �• All ST : f. MIS a it, ..NLLs' WN/ + ` ...« ^_ ALL SITE PREPARATION GRADING fOft BUtlL1iS5, _ `,REST U I, a: _ _ ..-----_-::::::7:::1= RETAWING WALLS,U1U11E5 AND PAVEMENTS NT. I r'ti— TO BE DONE W ACCORDANCE'MTH OEOTECINCAL -_- �:'- --::•-„:11.,: R A RANT T ' - REPORT DATED MARCH 11.1003.PROJECT NO.T-N2{. --- , `,, ',! O � �• i■Y�- '= BY TERRA ASSOCIATES.WC. --1 ' I i \:',1' ~-A'' ice•'' e I 6..,)0 ii,a� '.�,14 0 111 �� i s 00 I FI'0.J, �� ,�� ��� �'_. A fl �® 1�� X10; ° r:-. T PREPARED 8, - 4r,,•.:•••; _,e .�l:G,-'3 BR�p DPFU�R�-i LDC. . I • s�PRpPps�/ Desren croup o-K 'r'.1r'. .l-, vtenre ARCHITECTS VAN LOMCI COMPANY Engi s VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT Surveyor' PRELIMINARY GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ---~ 31 NW First Avenue,Sutte 309 70/39/07 TUALATIN, OREGON Portland,OR 97209 ©AR LOW COMPANY 503.226.0590 AIA,PC 3A r I r— I L— 1— I 1--J I I f ' (EVIC: ;:a.L.. _i . / ' I I - t ID .'•• e ,� '11 .\ ,%, l `� _ • -- - /. / On• . \ CITY UAL\� . � OFT ATi IV 4I' Mt % ECEIVEU ,:itif iffii sol "�. OCT 2 9 2003 n it rig x - - / ;7,. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I PLANNING DIVISION I - - '� �,� I VILLAGE INN mi e , /∎' i I SITE , A I// AWE :. I THE RfOL I AC.0 PNESEHTED T HIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED N ACCOEDANCT YIN RECOGNIZED ENGMEEREW REMOL4 E%ISIING TREES PRINCIPLES AND IS F.H CENTRAL NFORYAIED ONLY. TNIS EXACT LOCATION TO OE pEIEYINED NFONMATION SHOULD NO'BE USED OR RELIED UPON FOP ANY \ AT TIME OF ORAL DESIGN OEDINED TE SPECIFIC APPLICATION YTNWT COMPETENT PRUFESSIDNK Y/TINE ONTS ` EXAMINATION AND vERIFICAOON OF ITS ACCURACY,SUITABILITY AND SI APPLICA50 USE BY A COMPETENT LICENSED ASSUMES ALL 1 7;,...1:1", \ ANYONE MANNN:USE Of THIS WOMAN.ASSUMES NE 11 � \ LIABILITY ARISING FROM M USE o , LEGEND i 1 /1::.;�' ./ FaSING cowman nor I / WW yep EIGSRNG MOM.TREE , T T• �y'�p. !'" (�) \ Y\ * TE'lO BCE RE�OKO I'REPARFO BY• (� ' '� ' \ TD EnST i0 0fcP Eye K TKE 2:REMOVE. ,,. '• LDC Design Grow.Im .",.,,,,K \ ARCHITECTS VAN LOMIZICOMPANY E pinnelrs VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT / Sunvgors � - • I-1 - PORT TREE REMOVAL PLAN (APPROVED) —.�-� CITY OF TUALATIN 34MV First 0 97209,Suit*309 ARCHITECTS Ol TUALATIN, OREGON Portland,OR 97209 ©ARCH EE I VAN LOM•COMPANY 503.226.0590 ALA,PC 3B ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW I 1st SUBMITTAL px(E. 41e.°3.-/. I ( S 1(900) (1000) 0100) I (0)O: C o U A C R E ( E N ) z b b p �o,. V 0(eo° _ �°� _I I TUALATIN V. i�[JY maw .°rrra°r u g ,. ��.�_ 588'49'34•E 821.19' rt rw ' (1500) (16001;9 ‘11 568 3'23 E 93.1.' - '-.�• - me "°" , I. I ��� ������ i�. p7oo1 p, 1� �� ,� OCT 2 9 2003 . . 586 .` _ :! ���' � °Iii `- s v 111 . DEVELOPMENT LG DIVISION iIi :: �>iii ,t �!, g i I� �` / ' 1A j/• 4.441 ,., e. ". 4 (500) •4 .0", ,. 2 VILLAGE INN , . W �� r oz°°) SITE � I `'� � �j�� T \E Y �� VH M E\5\ 1 /- j�� (6001 } PREPARED BY,, ( ,off/� I 9. . ) L>exrn Group/nc �y2 TEA ARCHITECTS VAN LOM�COMPAHYrs VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT CITY OF TUALATIN EXISTING BUILT ENVIRONMENT 34 NW First Avenue.Suite 309 10/20/03 TUALATIN, OREGON tr.COPYRIGHT Portland.OR 97209 ARC 311TECTS Vow LON•COMPANY °" ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 907326050 PC 4A 1st SUBMITTAL 9)(fE: Ae .0316 � ' /r III / PROPOSED'BRIDGEPORT MLLAGE' / j j 111 i n a �_ FUTURE DEVELOPMENT / r/ II (EXISTING F UR DURHAM QUARRY) / \ It/ : \GTT OF IMAM 7/ % /Q " � -�+ ._CRY OF TUALAlN / I tN / A '.4 \ *z:,OFFCh \ l/ uEa A`'� ,iI / CONNECT TO PROPOSED i �/ O . IMQ • CITY OF TUALATIN WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS ARE INCLUDED / / (TYPICAL) / IN THE 'OFFSITE' (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO / PROPOSED WATER -�, y\\ f +I , ,, ii SW BRIDGEPORT RD. x SW 72ND AVE.) a VAIMF1LIERE -/,/ 'l■ r^F-+F��-•^A �"�'� 1r► y�. DRAINAGE REPORT. OR APPROOED EQUAL / ,�_� • Jr� __ , �1-.I !f f REVIEW / O . — \I. PROPOSED 4•FIRE A3 11 444 f E -a'+i i'1r 1:7A Tr I� ' ��/ / I+I � �I+ ill � / VILLAGE INN � u ., ,__ _ _ DATE: 1 RESTAURANT s 1��� ����,•\.D � � ' �'fjr PROPOSED 1• 8 c• , pg WpATE METER 'L RRE ERA TB I ` E}�\ WATER SOME \ ^ __n SEE�SEPARATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR I II 8 ��BTlIlC71A� 00,11r9,- �, II�L i/� 0 SW BRIDGEPORT ROAD AND SW 72ND AVENUE. IPROP08ED ,r II i/per° a 1 ,�yi� 1 A 8 R� I I ��/a / 534R.OP�D F�NRE) A l o—p 1 ` //pr aFF9TE �I (PR a®11 e ^/� / MANHOLE(SAL) E PREPARED BY. 71, . /'7 �+ LDC / II Dew',Group.M �` \ I+ '\ i /� plAmxn \j'/ ARCHITECTS VAN LOM�COMPANY Engineers Sun eYON MO�. I+ . TAM RR. 1.1A0 0 MA/.N M.=MA. VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT ,A AWN"Suite 301 17/19/03 34 NW?Int A PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN ©COPYRIGHT ►«ehn4 OR Y110! ARCHITECTS VAN LAM•COMPANY 303.22 4.0510 AIA,PC TUALATIN, OREGON 4B , EMERGENCY GATE 9.,. I RUMMY nail?,U.,.' FIRE ACCESSWAY — er_iie,-...'44— - --..N.... ..,i,.. );77 ,4:. REGAL CINEMA : ‹ ' L . - • ` f_ _::~wWVliill= _ ; ,. ...„...„...,,,,...„.....,,„...,„„re.,_,,.....„ ,....„~r - r % . e :a "'" "„ CITY OF TUALATIN• rr�`tt►, r. ..�+.T...- «_:,,. .•:� ! ° ' . �f RECEIVED :; �� ., � .� . ,.. ;�:; -s::� OCT 2 9 2003 ,i r ,• rY , o.mR. ;j; Lig.....• ; . El 1. �fi�' , = r,=� MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT II __ rMqlIlf (4. ' ” PLANNING DIVISION tow. • wv 40 -'IPA..^ ���y` !k�!±+a+if ' BLDG.(N) WV ;� `.1J •• �: LEGEND :: r '° % • ? PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION 4'— G / / •o ' ` -';',...-,7. VILLAGE INN +•+.-- PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION THROUGH RETAIL / �' - �► r i SITE -•NNf VEHICULAR CIRCULATION l''.\* / ,i' FIRE ACCESSWAY r �� '� ,, NOTE: • '' BICYCLE PARKING(VILLAGE INN): 6-SPACES(2 COVERED,4 UNCOVERED) 1 / e 2 • � t p PREPBY amen Gmmft Pr ARCHITECTS VAN LOM 10 COMPANY Engineers Planners VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT Surveyors OSED STREETS &t PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS " .° CITY jr TUALATIN TUALATIN, OREGON ""and,OR"'R'"'s'*''01 ()COPYRIGHT hR1and,CIE,720f I 1E d OM•COMPANY 303.2240590 Aw PC 4C i ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 1st SUBMITTAL r LANDSCAPE LEG=END er.•al <a..NM! 00:O/C010. WAG.. r Ma* ooTANzAL Wee O w Ourr la .ara v..... r.. - 1 ,. 11.�Poo Y.s. !o oa IM P.m.*M r• 3! two 11.w.M 5 1 M1..w•w.•y.o.c•ran... M =Tan., IGtl....Mepa,4yuo.1'0.4606.., / '"'°`°"'°°" CITY OF TUALATIN ms liP 4� ` di RECEIVED �,�� %�•.'� _ . ��I Or► C ..d,�..�. OCT 2 9 2003 ill 416 ea%f c.,._i•"- �� ` ," a. 3 >o COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT //: � ND '�� +4;0e n °°°-' PLANNING DIVISION I •r!'.-Z� .....—' ►��, (i■ Ieii�v •Kit, ,..— 'g. �► s'U. `::10 I 1 • �.��`�,47'— I V j Ui; kill ; ..mow.M,—=„,..=1,,r .,...w.......a,•-'..4..Ad• 4. KAM i����^�� ',��� ,yip► \ .� g.".tr.•nra• A� .1 � 4 c V.�� •.. 0 ia4F "" LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS la ti'':.' ArAllp. 4•4:..t4P!:r•''Ij TOTAL WEER 1 117.772/7 ...,•.,,. ° ,; ,: 009. , ,,. eT /\O PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 3...'T...'.� 10 1'✓ 3ao3.o n L> o S VV. 1�GEp .• K ..Me Rtun% cc8o P ::µms.e.,,,..a•„SS...•. • � Aw W ,,,,M,,. CHRISTOPHER FRESHLEY •uo;>art LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT reITm.tt% no BS sa a as MP•,.M.nM.Oft/PM-PION••0....NM • ARCHITECTS VAN LOMOCOMPANY CITY OF TUALATIN VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 34 NW First Avenue,Suite 309 i0/20/03 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW TUALATIN, OREGON Portland,On 97209 yj(t .CppVO 507.216.0590 AARCHITECTS 5 i 1st SUBMITTAL ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CITY IN REE CEIVED IVED 1st SUBMITTAL ., OCT 2 9 2003 . �� 03 7 , ,,.�,_.�o ,,, MALL MOM, 1.14.410■11/1E TT. 1 NV reti...a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RAWER MOM TIMMILL raMf.,, IIMMAINMN.,, PLANNING DIVISION �:-•:`�. Tnw' MIN w kW%MOO MDR samovar MAI..1-n• il WEIN Ye., TAON MAN �� 1pN1■111 111■1111111■ IEHR111R 1I111a a a �1111■Ip� 1i■ Iiill ��1 .■Amy �� Mr Typ .13.4.4 Num COLON �Q■rte. .cis _� �' }�` 1.�■ilia "-°� _ ... _ ,..y 11 - _ _ RINI nshr- y..F r10111R IIIIO Ytna'4e'JD+'ACp.laOt 1.101M0 „ ONOWNLIINT ELEVATION 'MOB"" 1vw �� TIIM uww o^�" ONORR#AST ELEVATION •°"° ",• R•.l-r a w.ra• BUILDING 5TREE7 FRO TAGS AREA 492 5<2.FT. 1.5NDC21 5 REST FRONTAGE AREA,294 5f1 FT. PERCENTA WITIOCU6 FACING STREET,I V% ADDIT.CNAL UNDO.*•NORTIEAST ELEVATION FROIT CORNER•BR V I Fir �, ;.'I TOTAL WINDCul STREET FRONTAGE AREA 414 5G.FT. PERCENTAGE 6 UR•COUl5•TND AVE.•96.. p11_DNG T' ET•EIDE BRIDGEPORT 40'•U14 •621D' 'r WINDOWS STREET•6IDE WITt-III. •44' PERCENTAGE CF rINDQIA•BRIDGEPORT•24% 6001OPP CSa..n`CO l.a oe, WaN1i � 02211.1N.BOW MI. ccann n.e.wr lai.US..o6Q Alw.T-r �� .u4.n..4...caw AAUr.a .aafl.F 'S,An Loan..A1.a"-Arms FRONTAGE•BOTH STREETS•1012• •���e� TOTAL UMIDO 8 I BOTH STREET5•616 irr W^�'� PERCENTAGE•50i1,5'TiEETS•5A WINO OEM 5 .�s �ra.o-r' IR100.RR May LAW, wnr... "R.I..' �� a`° r — T - -T f-- 11111I1/lIHIEIII w AI ,rt••.O0.tr r ( A • a • • a a iIi T�....,:garno......7 � � _ _ Ir 1. ■r-u.T ; �,� i FRM/N M�,I iMA.T1R VEIS, R Rl 'L •R•.•..cN „100 NW FIRINANIRMI*MR MICK 1111110 --- I-0 OSOYTT ELEVATION SOUTHEAST ELEVATION ++, COLA.. °' INS 1U12TA3 p PRELIMINARY BUILDING ELEVATIONS ,,, Mr, M_aN Tor OPUS. -- V I LLACE INN >._N.■ Sao" 6A . Y.0111r. .IYAR 'J �� City of Tualatin 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue RECEIVED PLANNING Tualatin, Oregon 97062-7092 /l\ Main 503.692.2000 NOV 2 4 2003 J TDD 503.692.0574 CITY OF TIGARD November 21, 2003 Mr. Mike Nichols Opus NW 1000 SW Broadway Suite #1130 Portland, OR 97205 RE: STATUS OF AR-03-16 —VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT PROJECT AT 17070 SW 72nd Avenue (BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE)(2S113DB 100 & ODOT Property) Dear Mike: The application for the Architectural Review of the New Village Inn Restaurant project has been reviewed and was determined complete on November 21, 2003. The neighboring property owner comment period ends on December 5, at 5:00 p.m. . Staff will proceed with the review of the architectural features and the public facilities of the portions of the project in the MUCOD and within the City of Tualatin. We will schedule a meeting with you to go over the draft decision. If you have any questions, please call me at 503-691-3027. Sinc re y 4) illiam Harps AICP Associate Planner c: Catherine Corliss, Angelo Eaton &Associates Dick Bewersdorf, City of Tigard Theresa Wilson &Greg Miller, Washington County Roel Lundquist, City of Durham Roger Hansen& Marah Danielson, ODOT Doug Rux, Community Development Director Jason Tuck, Economic Development PC Dayna Johnson, Engineering Associate file: AR-03-16 • •� Project: ,� �<«�� LAND USE APPLIC�i ION Date: i2 . ,)� COMPLETENESS REVIEW COMPLETE 1XINCOMPLETE STANDARD INFORMATION: JI Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownership r Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees R Impact Study (18.390) '.. USA Service Provider Letter ❑ Construction Cost Estimate I -# Sets Of Application Materials/Plans U Pre-Application Conference Notes EJ Envelopes With Postage (Verify Count) PROJECT STATISTICS: • Building Footprint Size CC:. % Of Landscaping On Site ❑ %Of Building Impervious Surface On Site bbl Lot Square Footage PLANN DIMENSIONED: ❑ Building Footprint ❑ Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking) ❑ Truck Loading Space Where Applicable LI Building Height ❑ Access Approach And Aisle ❑ Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: ©l Vicinity flap [ Architectural Plan Ail Tree Inventory RI Existing Conditions Plan ❑ Landscape Plan Site Plan ❑ Lighting Plan TREE PLAN/MITIGATION PLAN: ❑ - - ❑ ❑ - ❑ - ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) ❑ - ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ - ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.765(ON-Street Parking/loading Requirements) ❑ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) ❑ 1 8.63 0(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.705(Access/Egress/Grculation) ❑ 18.780(Signs) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.185(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 1 8.310(Yariances/Adjus mien ts) El 1 8.715(Density Computations) ❑ 18.190(Tree Removal) ❑ 1 8.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.795(rail Clearance Areas) ❑ 18.385(Mvsceaaneous remits) ❑ 18.125(Environmental Pertomunce Standards) ❑ 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay Distract) ❑ 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wirekss Connwnianon Facilities) ❑ 1 8.410(Lot in Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Ovuily) ii 18.810(Street&(Miry Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(land Partitions) ❑ 18.142(Home Occupation Perms) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.145(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 1 8.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.150(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ❑ 18.520(Commeroal Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.155(nixed Solid Wastes cycling Storage) ❑ 1 8.530(Industrial Ioning Districts) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ADDITIONAL ITEMS' -i: s( _ter r--.,,e.---- e.---4.-.1re_5e ca--(24:4-(1 .41-1,, i :ite...0-61 '*-'1:-., . t I:\curpinlmasters'revisecNand use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: village Inn COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 12/18/03 GRADING ® Existing and proposed contours shown. ® Does proposed grading impact adjacent parcels? ❑ Yes ® No ® Adjacent parcel grades shown. STREET ISSUES ❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. Show rights-of-way ® Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ® Street name(s) shown. ® Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. ® Street profiles shown. ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo n/a on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ® Traffic Impact Report ® Street grades compliant? ® Street widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width appropriate? ❑ Other: Access/Driveway Provide dimensions of width and radius. Provide detail of modification to existing driveway for right-in/right-out movement, including "pork chop". Indicate if untilities will be placed underground, the fee-in-lieu payed or if an adjustment will be applied for. SANITARY SEWER ISSUES I Existing/proposed lines shown. Show location of connection to Tigard public sewer. ® Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? NA ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines shown? Show where access drive runoff will be collected. ❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention Provide calcs if facility is within City of provided? Tigard. ❑ Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? Show facility on plan. ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? n/a REVISED: 12/18/03 1 ❑ Facility shown outside any v,_Jand buffer? n/a ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? NA The submittal is hereby deemed ❑ COMPLETE E INCOMPLETE By: :�' I/ L - Date: 12/18/03 REVISED: 12/18/03 December 22, 2003 ,�� „dq,.lil Opus Northwest CITY OF TIGARD Attn: Bruce Wood 1000 SW Broadway, #1130 OREGON Portland, OR 97205 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal/SDR2003-00017NAR2003-001 l ' Dear Mr. Wood: The City received your request for Site Development Review (SDR) approval for the above-referenced project. Based on a preliminary review of your application materials, Staff has determined that your submittal is incomplete for the purposes of continuing with Site Development Review. Please submit the following information in order for staff to begin your review: • Show street trees and proposed landscaping for boarders site. • Show rights-of-way. • Provide dimensions of width and radius of access drive. • Provide detail of modification to existing driveway for right-in/right-out movement, including "pork chop". • Indicate if utilities will be placed underground, the fee in-lieu paid, or if an adjustment will be applied for. • Show location of connection to Tigard public sewer. • Show where access drive run-off will be collected. • Show water quality/detention facility on plans. • Provide water quality calculations if facility is within City of Tigard. • Provide 16 complete copies of submittal materials. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171, x2437. Sincerely, ' Matkie(v Scheidegger / Associate Planner i:\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2003-00017.acc c: SDR2003-00017 Land use file Opus Northwest Attn: Mike Nichols 1000 SW Broadway, #1130 Portland, OR 97205 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 0 OPUS OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. OR CCB#105336 1000 SW Broadway, Suite#1130 Portland, OR 97205 Phone(503)916-8963 Fax: (503)916-8964 TRANSMITTAL Date: March 3, 2004 To: City of Tigard Village Inn Access Modifications 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard SDR2003-00017NAR2003-00109 Tigard, OR 97223 Attention: Matt Scheidegger We are sending: [X] Attached [ ] Under Separate Cover [X ] Hand Delivered [ ] Sent U.S. Mail. (Courier,Fed X, UPS, U.S.Mail) The Following: [ ] Copy of Letter [ ] Prints [X] Plans [ ] Samples [ ] Specifications [ ] Shop Drawings [ ] Change Order [ ] Sepias [ ] QUANTITY DATE DESCRIPTION 16 3-3-04 Site Development Review Submittal 1 3-3-04 Letter addressing Notice of Incomplete Submittal These are transmitted: For Approval _ Approved _ For Your Information X For Your Use _ Approved As Noted _ For Bids Due X As Requested _ Not Approved _ For Review and Comment Notes: Please contact me if you have any questions. File - City of Tigard Correspondence OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. Mike Nichols OPUS M OPUS NORTHWEST,L.L.C. A member of The Opus Group 1000 Southwest Broadway,Suite 1130 THE OPUS GROUP Portland,OR 97205 A R C H I T E C T S Phone 503-916-8963 C O N T R A C T O R S Fax 503-916-8964 D E V E L O P E R S www.opuscorp.com March 3, 2004 Matt Scheidegger City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: REVISED SUBMITTAL - TIGARD SDR2003-00017NAR2003-00109 ACCESS MODIFICATION FOR VILLAGE INN PARKING Dear Matt, We are submitting the revised Site Development Review package for completeness review incorporating the information requested in your Notice of Incomplete Submittal dated 12-22-03. All requested items have been inserted into the SDR binder. I will itemize below how we responded to each of the items in your letter. • Show street trees and proposed landscaping for Borders site. Sheet 5C has been inserted showing the street trees and landscaping. • Show rights-of-way. Sheet 1C has been inserted showing the subject rights-of-way. • Provide dimensions of width and radius of access drive. Sheet 4D has been inserted showing details of the design of the entrance into the Tri-Met Park and Ride facility, showing drive widths. Sheet 4E has been inserted showing the overall street design for SW 72nd Avenue. Notes E and F pertain to the radius of the access drive on the north and south. Both sides have a 40'-0" radius. • Provide detail of modification to existing driveway for right-in/right-out movement, including "pork chop". Sheet 4E has been inserted showing the overall street design for SW 72nd Avenue. Included is the "pork chop" right-in/right-out element. Sheet 4F has been inserted which is a copy of ODOT Drawing Number RD705 for the construction of the "pork chop". • Indicate if utilities will be placed underground, the fee in-lieu paid, or if an adjustment will be applied for. Opus is planning on paying the fee in-lieu. THE OPUS GROUP: Allentown•Atlanta•Austin•Chicago•Columbus•Dallas•Denver•Detroit•Fort Lauderdale•Houston•Indianapolis•Kansas City•Los Angeles•Milwaukee Minneapolis•Orange County•Orlando•Pensacola•Philadelphia•Phoenix•Portland•Sacramento•San Francisco•San Jose•Seattle•St.Louis•Tampa•Washington,D.C. Matt Scheidegger March 3, 2004 Page 2 • Show location of connection to Tigard public sewer. Sheet 4B indicates the route of the sanitary sewer to its connection with the Tigard public sewer at the intersection of Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue. • Show where access drive run-off will be collected. Sheet 4E has been inserted showing the overall street design for SW 72nd Avenue. This sheet also shows stormwater catch basins in the SW 72nd Avenue right-of-way which will be accepting stormwater runoff from the access drive. • Show water quality detention facility on plans. Sheet 4G has been inserted detailing the water quality and detention facilities for the street improvements. Water quality and detention is being handled downstream in Tualatin at the intersection of Hazelfern and Lower Boones Ferry. • Show water quality calculations if facility is within City of Tigard. Water quality and detention is being handled in Tualatin so no calculations have been provided. • Provide 16 complete copies of submittal materials. 16 copies have been provided We appreciate working with you through this process. Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have about this submittal. Sincerely, Mike Nichols Senior Project Manager Opus Northwest, L.L.C. cc: Cathy Corliss-Angelo Eaton & Associates 2 i r3AD PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: .tillage Inn 0 1700 COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 12/18/03 GRADING ® Existing and proposed contours shown. ® Does proposed grading impact adjacent parcels? ❑ Yes ® No ® Adjacent parcel grades shown. TREET ISSUES ri Right-of-way clearly shown. Show rights-of-way _® Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ® Street name(s) shown. ® Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. ® Street profiles shown. ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo n/a on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ® Traffic Impact Report ® Street grades compliant? ® Street widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width appropriate? 7( Other: Access/Driveway , Provide dimensions of width and radius. _, Provide detail of modification to existing driveway for right-in/right-out movement, including "pork chop". Indicate if untilities will be placed underground, the fee-in-lieu payed or if an adjustment will be applied for. SANITARY SEWER ISSUES X Existing/proposed lines shown. Show location of connection to Tigard public sewer. ® Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? NA ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ' ' Existing/proposed lines shown? Show where access drive runoff will be collected. tYt Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention Provide calcs if facility is within City of provided? Tigard. ❑ Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? Show facility on plan. ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? n/a REVISED: 12/18/03 ❑ 'Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? n/a ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? NA The submi al is hereby deemed COMPLETE ® INCOMPLETE By: B•'S•04 Date: 12/18/03 REVISED: 12/18/03 U a4.14 1 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON March 17, 2004 Opus Northwest Attn: Bruce Wood 1000 SW Broadway, #1130 Portland, OR 97205 RE: Notice of Complete Submittal/SDR2003-00017 Dear Mr. Wood: The C ity h as r eceived the i nformation n ecessary t o b egin t he review o f your Site Development application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal complete as of March 1 6, 2004 and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed as complete is 5-6 weeks. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171, x2437. Sincerely, , 17 Ar74 ° C=^c cam"-` Mathew Scheidegger Associate Planner is\curpl n\ma th ew\sd r\SDR2003-00017.acc.acc c: SDR2003-00017 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 03/23/2004 TUE 13:01 FAX 503 "8 0782 RCI Construction ?001/007 FMRCI CONSTRUCTION GROUP S p e Z©o -©� r , General Contractors & Engineers Date: 23. OI Sent By: 1\w‘bedv rvt�e To: Motes 5chei c c1 -e cFax Number: Fax Number:X84.'4251.4. Pages: r4- rP1 ec�s� Y1.o 1c-•ez Chavq e_ ■ \EN v s PO Box 231089 Tlgard,OR 97281-1089 • Phone(503)968-5941 • Fax(503)968-0782 website-www.rcl-group,corn Cnntrpctor Uc.79377 An Egyp!Opc.7957ly Erworor \-\0/ PLAN SHEET S1 PRELMfrA1t� rsJ°�.v1;517.0;\ fESIGV >l er.2Jae ( 1 O _ �y lye . ay. ( .. a ra 1;1"4•'; o • �. ': \ 1 aO Limit -� o .,^•• 0 :r• C 'D. T2+29. 1 O 2 'V o'`I :,s\� t .` o 'ea" "8P" LNJE a z s { s: ``��..,, T ^ N R JOQ 00'ca_ ©O L ,%31'8P" V t �2'p C Y `\' ,�; ' Os •_ <i Td 7J'S'41' i j L. 58. f�a0Y1 0:•c;l a b e e ~" (FaI a .- )R d - I ti ... - r, ' - '' �.rip:X:- �.. s ms-.. • _ eC _. :' ' ' '' 0 e•1,.I�__ 'r..0'' C77 BEGlN NfNG OF PR OJECT.- 4,- f-=` -----_,4.,�-Y ....,/,..,,..7_6,:::,..,i,.,.;,::7....-;,-...,-. ..4...--.� i:c�.'!.•�. r�rri_. z:�� _ Lp� - .�•;s - S J-r�: I l Z O BTA BP " iw�" -", �! �7� � R165.60CR O ,cd`'g Limit I=S 3.9.34128' � • a' © w (FnY) . Q V o t• •b I i R 30A00C. R T 5L 7J• ' -lumrmi•r } ca O Td 711541" . _ . :-s' T a 4 CPaeng l,i 'a T 34•57' ---7• as • 0 f 12' P■ '0 1 0 ® eOO ° OT a4 et, 8 C- ROADkAY NOTES eat �-� STORM SENER NOIFS OI ebnst. Sidewalk Ramp 2Qi Sir. 'W'.21+70(J�J'RI.) C] of (Ste Wash. Co. 1]y.No- CS-3060400.)) Cons!.Aa'et Catch Basin(CC-48) © Protect Existing OrfrsY CpyFRAL NOTES: k CD z(See CWS d o �_ Q Cast SiCeraK 19. 240) 6' Sea. '©P'20+58(25,3•[1.) As Storrs,P.es to be Class V RCP r-r (See 1RoM. Co.Ihg, No. CS-305) CansL ha'ef Co *fc Bash(C,-48)/0 Str�p LWr.s Otherwise Idan[YCed. J ,_..S al ® Sta '8P'27+70(25.3'LtJ Inst. 72-Sec Pyle - 195' RascK My`.Sbw: Thus: X yr cl • = co.,.0 Ccnc. Crab o.d Glitter (See CMS Crg.No.240) o C) (See Wash.Ca Lhg.Na.CS-.30o) Cons)Wet Cafsh Bash(CC-46)w/e Sump .Ramer. free Sitcom Tnas- r1- fstl. 72"Sew.Pips- !04' Potmfia'Willy Caid.fc!s t�- (See CIIS Polea'e Prior to ConoWcticn - 4 Ot .Hisor Adjrs/Nonhoie Org.N0.240) .... � (Sea&eycn SW Org. No. POMO) WATER lDte MOTF'.a^ Cot ,n . ® ® KIN,Connecllm 14.1.C. 2 Sta. 'Pa'22+92(373'LL) Pns1k.4 LIMO Co:Aict Nos X ® Coast.Camnovice Lrr.ew°y Coast.Wet Cetcif Rosin(CC-4e) r/o Sump Proposed Fre H (See Wash. Co.1A•g.Na.OW-2018) Mg. Tr Sew.Pyoe- 123' ® l�'a�t Il.LC. rr{i © AnstoY/AOnvrenf BGI (see c"5 n'¢"°'240) CURB RETURN DATA TABLE I 'V °e (See Wash. Ca.erg.No.Af-4G4(7/Q0.)) ^ J IA 0 \4L,, �i Ste. P 22+85 37.3'RL) iO.C. a > ROacc!e£dating Parer Pole(by others) ( 0 L'Y/R9 Q STA710N _ Cant hifet Colch Basin(CC-46)r/o Swnp OFFSET ! ✓• IUAVS DELTA �•'� per; Q Remow Tree T-8 #5- Ansl. 72'Ser. Pyre- 175' P.0 'BP'21+70.69 24.07' 19526 • <� O P (See CMS Log.Na 240) 1 4 O W enrow frees Itith.h RAY / 'BP'If+B6.OJ 27.06' 793.38 CC IL u= rn 7-32-re A 1/`2 A 'de.21+99.02 35.76' 795.53 40.00' 9079'40" - t-to @�h p 7-28'Fv ® Sto. '3P 23+50(37.3'Lt.) '' 0 z °_ ~ 3/40 'Bo'27+07.66 4877' 19587 2-4"Ygp�e Canst. frie7 Cold,Pass,(CC-48)w/a Sump _ 40 y` Q a fns!. 72'Sew. Pear- 58' P,T. '$°-TP+1R69 64.77 IA5_16 a. C•o,A. I.-15'Mgafe _ (tee CMS Ll a.No. 240) P_C. $P'22+48.66 7589' 156.32 ci m 3 6 Q Cart. Canmen"e0 Gri"erroy ® Sfa ea'24+50 07.3'1G) f/4 6. '� 27+51.74 6267' 195.07 ,�•'Th,'• E¢1 o m (See NfosA. Co Org. No. OW-203) Cant Inlet COO Basin(CC-48)./o Swap B 1/231 'BP'27+60.42 47.66' 795.7) 40.07' 6330717' MSL 12-See.Ppe- 100' 3/40 'BP%2T+73.38 39.0.3' 795.52 0 (See ChS Le5L No.240) 4 sw es ` P.T. "do'7$+68.65 J80D'_ f9ST9 urea Mai` fa ' I a. u i WIT•• 3 J iliti a 'a lr.m i a I. • • a o u - _1 i 1 . , - . ._ .. , ',i i ..____r_ ... 1 .. 1 s ..: .. .. ... _ ii• Q i, sr+s .d8 vls . I 1 ,:. iorO21d .J0 JN1NN+38 +I —4__ _._... .._. ' _..__. ...._ I r !_pe,.... .,. ___I__..••- 'r r•6'ii I rI. xe • ___ - I 1 ' ic.'81 2i. i 00'•r+: _d-. ...... ' 00'00 61 _J. /o \ • • r •oO Iv .__ _ ../ '4._... ,�'t,. .._ . n•a •lre — ( 1913' • / / , I 1 •' - Ø . •Z! .015 17 M • . • ..r 1•saO 10 ' •II t1 y -. _._ ..... I � � � - �o O n .- -... I-- ._�....._T�._�.�—....1_ r ...s._I_..--- 71 2. I (3)Y!'16t 'il • .. . N , o I I G1l) :::::,...i., : , �' Q to O I °coil JAL 1 W 8— ._.. ._._—T.. I l `961"asi --- m ...r �ya. +tZ Jn 1i ; z IAN 14v UP-1 cfPY j — ____.. IP+ ; fh 1- - M i.- 00'0.:1 .as ! fa)ill rite°ai 1.P�I. I It_ _ GO 1St 161 7'1 I _ _Cn I +1 S•dB. ,tnlpy L'L6111 O L'VEI 13 JAL 1 I i ■ SE•S611 g1 -.......I ... i —_•___...00'06•nat d........ .... I I I O +i . �L0:06+�7....�.-.. I m k ' I' a n I Lo7 zs 1 11 ;A Z J 1 rn .._••• / 1e11iPV !,1»9-1 Pu I lf'G61 '2•,1 1' 9+Zd 3 �v,r,},,, g o01i1 I---"_-T-zz i clod,643 a`ll _1i... .. .. .... ._ � .i ! ' ' i (.�)6E"061 'a'1I . N t...... —Fs'G6I at3 J0! f 44 WI Ii,lI 6c+ ■ I I `� _. .. �,�• p (M)06- •1 9v 1�p I —._.. �..._. . oven--% .._..._.._. .. I I — f . NH I 05'A 1 �p, • i I .F 1 t ......_.r..._. . .. .. . ': EC 964 nn/7__ __—. __ Y�I - i ; ; 'OSTSi Pne K. 1 a I 66'Gt }I 1 ; , Tr 1 I MATCH LINE sec sIIrr_T •/A ^ -c t ��'t ?fir d p S • . i,•: PRELIMINARY, rNCOMPLETT DRAWINGS - NOT FULLY AAPRovEO 8Y GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS - L , SEE COVER SHEET FOR APPLICABLE NOTES AND INSTRUCTIONS. J _ BRIDGEPORT ROAD / - ' OWO, No. RHCIS1oN 6A1b g t LOWER BOONES FERRY ROAD - ----m �` , 6 LIPPEN BDONE0 PERM'PIA TO a.W.BMW AVE. GOWN '1 DI�IA30.C. DRAINAGE ONLY D• wA9MN070N COUNtr DFRU.YO. 75.f•Submittal •P LEFT STORM LINE PROFILE SHEET la CwvTI ...— Drainage Rwvlelona I2 9 STA. 'BP" 15+85.11 TO STA. 'BP" 20+50 t..' p IA Q�j/pogo Rw/alone V• �■ '- • sued For Pw•m1(s "/VJ I L00/800Z . . — uoIlonLUsuo) I321 Z8L0 890 UN IVA Z0:8t HILL tOOZ/8Z/�0 i _. I H _ __i___. _ ---1---..-.. _._ - -- - ....-...---.. ._.-.._... __ _ .___. .._._ .___ _j --• ....____. .... , ___•. I s '•- _ --... .. BEGINNING OF PRGJECT I ! ?'_ J : —. STA. "8177.0+45 i 1 +a I I I x x ag 7 I • 1 a +et, I I I / I ■ 0 l e I er t T1 o v .. I 746'X AW 7/alNPY /x •061 '7l , J;1;2 XL' - 00 os+1 do_ ; 0)019M '3l -. T -�+w. Pnf I OD'461 Ao13 001 Z N ! AY 7u61M Pu33 4srul OL- I i 8 _ I ._0 4r••awPd9�-- ____ 1 m I I • 1 7T xs't m _..i- 1o. Ldp_ —.. -.. J__, I.--! N uNAY 11.1 021 !31 6LL��Q6t MI " 1. Z'SBl {'EL3 001 $ , � oc.��0�----- �-- , rw ! n 1 ! ;. lt-i I . I. . g. 4 . I I I. I . o ! i I I.4.____i1 - 4_. I. I MATCH LINE S`.e `JIEit Its • . �b $8w ;C_, ', PRELIIIINARY��TE QRANINCS- NOT FULLY APPROVED BY GOVERNINC.JRISDICTTONS T.n I, `. 33 \ SEE COVER SHEET FOR APPLICABLE NOTES AND INSTRUCT10Ns. BRIDGEPORT ROAD / DWG,I O. 1?..vt,itrN DArk: uY.\Pr. LOWER BOOMED FERRY ROAD - '. _ 1trPEP t/OOMI.•GARY M.TO S.W.07RD AYE. Maw 9/OJ ,PC DRAINAGE ONLY 3/04 REA a m; WACNWOYOR COYNTY • DTSKFC 9/11•I. .11]/52 Svbmrttdl • ,1/04 ' a RIGHT STORM LINE PROFILE SHEET i XarfQ— /i:\ folneoC Rvn 1,202 1216 lea r a STA 'BP' 15+85.71 TO STA.'BP' 26 50 - G - IA\• •MoAd Re..46.;._ t1/b7 Na -•--f' \Issued FM'PatTnitm nibs — - -' uotlonJlsuo) IDN Z8L0 Su �0� XVA ZO��T III 17O0Z/ Z/ O L00/�00�] ~��� ' O 5S`L PXEUMK+MT 38ClEr sCYEEP.� 1 R6' 275 xx+900,7 ,BP ■ LINE © PLAN 3 H E E T m SIGN _ /7 13P'32+53.95 cte Sher: 1.}t O� . Yom.1041 , - I ! p•(r! I_ W QQf� IrC0 ® GFr.V.hg © "72'85+41.4f ) ©0 Q.©© 3�F ly \_ Ikrlil .(Ft) q.:a 4- • • mum LRIr M1YIiES' p• W 0 f,® O ��2 t. • 1fi .d`.q +}♦ `�' �-e Water Corner/Ian N.I.0 �' ��'� tV = -• .-•••.. ... _ ..... ... O I sue' - i. �.4 J. _',_- _ f 1. o• e I =8AIDGEPGRT •i �' z -�� • :411560,-. +�e r��f�v GENERAL NOJ7S: !12 .P•..N `, ��.�_.-orslp- 'ff- 1 �•-�r1':- s '/+fit► ,rR"+.�, Y1. 'c.- ' • �]� 7.v S:arc•I Ppes:o be = p E Mil =W '- _.'�^YY •r- �.•': 44..";.'f----.-'11-4 �'O+ti�6 •Y f•-•.•J•:•• lass v RCP Llnlus n R � S -.__ _._-._ .3..... .. _-_ OlrsrMSe identified. ? ova �� J ----:-.--L-`h' _ -sue- ,.��w~ /•-'O f2i ( e�! 1i111Y ,-1.1,, 3 u -4�i,z +. N•tip'xyr � `,, __-= -_ s.•. 4_` O S' .•• ray �'�t �. (� )^ �� C s• Q I a a .g.LhIA.' +�. r • Yl "dp ', �' \-C . �J °z I 444 'k 1: ss e> i' �A.. A r , cc �I rya, . \�` l .71I u t F� - i, t N A `1.° • •'1 fJ ' '� _i v 'si. ' ' 1•Te .Fox.- - w'h ' i OW Arno. _ �- .I O A fl i t •`f .- w� -_ =i } p © o •Iumh.re�. f r \ r •. '' �� uI �` O 3 b 1 axe) ' f I `-H( 'ei. ...s' s,7.• ,x R 'C i spa °e..s �f+, �a �ro .q' Goodin Lvntt 1.t • x `CS L! Jt 1 3 c+ (ad) i ifltJ•` t Q1. ,-�.i ! 9 r 1Kant t1 41 I• [sae She 41',D1© $d"® 'i, 0 At el 1.E $ . !-1 ROADWAY HGTES tied I II ta; CURB RETURN DATA TABLE I f ev° STCPM SERER MOTS 1 'n nPo 7.0..C. z Oi CcosL SLIewnk Q Sta 'a°'26+75(58.8'RL) y-IA 0 CURB ¢STATION OFFSET F[FV 840135 DELTA s. � (See W nh. Co.Org.lro. Coml.C1rb Wei Nanhote(CG-48 MN)w/o Sur,p 2@7 Stn. 5P'34+50(26'fit)t- P.C. '21°'26+71.89 3507' fma J2 © z .pry CS-305) lost. IY Sew Pisa-390' Corsi rY7e'Cr1`inlet 1 iA '9P'26487.12 39.05' 15640 I� Cans,. Siktra'k (See CNS Org.No 195) Ins_ 12'Sew, POe - 105' ® AdJ si Intel / 0 r .C (See!began Std. Drg.Na R0720) R.n niter-K..1 CannecL to Emig. t5'seem A' 1f'A '6P'17400,21 47.7<' 196.51 40.00' 90Th"4 o 1.E 174.00(N) 1.. 1724 4/ J/441 '8P'27403.87 60.75' 195.78 4 ® Ste. 9°•26+58(388'LL) Z i Q Cans/. Cnnc LL.b and Got Ls- Ccnst. Curb 1Me[Ifa•1ha'e(CC-48 N.N)1./o Sloop 1E 174.00 10 ¢ ) (See page°Sid DR.N.RD376) Ft '8P'27+11.87 8897' 195.75 m 1.r (Sr. Rosh.Co. DR.No. C5-SOD) ksf. 12'Sew. Pi De - 218' (See Oregon Std. Or Na ROJS4 yy p Sto. '6P'35400(8822 1L) NC 'ao'27+71.89 7592' 196.72 g a i 3 N.00r Ad a Manhole (See CMS Cog.Na. 195) Q ) �Proreef Fxtg. LY}+rsl' Cons". type G-T'Mfet f/4A 'a°'27+74.96 6Q 6C r985s a - 3 ;e'7. (See Oregon Sid Drg.Ho.P.O 360) ..�S Cav1. Peecosf Besin, 18'OeeP 8 1/2 A B°'27+74.95 47.59' r9S28 40.00' 893319' ° a i1- Sro. '°"P'24410 0 Remove Extg ManFab Rim Erre XX 2 .1� 0 Cons!. Conc.(slant Tjpe A @ (Jas'L1.) if. 1.74.51 J/4G 'P.P.27+7496 39.04 19507 1 0 r :CS (See Oregon Std Org.Na 80705) Cant Cab rrrel Mea#ae(CC-48 Mai)w/o So,,p@c Ste. 9P'33478(54.0'Rt.) (�Aga°510'. 019-So-917364) P.7. 8P'28+1L89 36.00' 795.90 ! Md. 12'Sew.Ape-254' CmsL Tice G-2-tole! P.C. '8P'2747713 75.09' 195.68 cn i OS Cons1. SN.no'k Ramp (Sc.CWS Org No MS) Cant Pietas!Hss'r{ f8'Dogs ® Ste. '72'541.80 _ (See A-egon Sfd.Drg.No.R0750) See Or t90.1 SIN Prows!Nesecde 1/!A '8P'27480.15 60.75' 195.89 a too I j ( eS`o• Na IFD.'.64) (For 0etar;See Sheet 78) c r/YA -5P'27+88.81 47.74' 195.97 4000' 40 CG"1f' m I g tent Manu•reot Bar Y Q Sta. 2'?'27+07(38.9'R!) 7i Slo. 'fi°'11t00(E88'RL) J/4A 'do`78+01.80 39.05' 19597 W p Q e (See w.h. ca.ar9 No. Canst.04>Inter.WenSdo(CG-48 M.H.)1./a Soap Ccnrt. type -c-2'wet „ Reconnect Slam Waif C la-400(000.)) fnsL 12'Sew. Pipe- 224' P.T. 'd°`78+17.13 36.00' 195.89 -v O s as 7 See Inleseetlor.Cronin tlsr. ]Y Sew. PVe - 111 )® 5f o. '8P'3°4-75(37.3'LIJ u ��+ iVO.`a O Sheet 17 9 ( ClYS�9•No. 195) (See Q•egon Std. Drg.Na ROJ64 P.C. 'BP'26+97.1! mar 156.34 fia•I5 type 2�G-48" 1/4t '9P`26497.1) 39.04' 796.38 2 C ra m I- 0 m © Canst. SlonN•d Gln-b F=T ® Ste VP'31+10(38.4'Lt.) ne• .&°.36400(676•Rt.) tnfet w/o Sant/ Q W a (Sc.s 7•a Std. a NO. ns, Type G-2'Wet Inst. 12'Ser.Rye- 155' D 1/24 VP'27+25.45 4769' 196.26 40.00' 895175' O W°o w 1- San A Cant. Toe'Cr'C -48'Wei r e Su of LL ° ( e K / nv Inst. 12'Sew P.✓De -90' (See CMS Org. Na 240) 3/4A = q • Ins!. 17'Sew. Pipe- 85' / 'BP'7.7+3412 FA.64' -195.97 2 d: p inst. 1S'Sew.P.y-.e - It 5ta '72'86431 ec r I-0 F Q9 Ra'accle Exisfin Power (5.x CMS Org.No.240) c P.T. BP'27437.19 7592' 195.68 at a," I- • P (See Oregon Sit Org.He.80364) l c hde M7O Wet W O Z e z - Rab2y others) Ste. 'Br'31x50 57.3'Rt.) (Foe Defals,See Sheet 79) a © ( ) ® Sto. 'BP'36+00(f.l'RL) • a 0 a e Q c 10 Mold)(mfg. Si:e.c�k Ce,sr. Type 'CC-98'Intel w/o&'.rep Cons!. Typ!e�'C-2'Ale! @ 51.. '6P'34412.69 ^--- I 0 f0 3 fL N Inst. 11'Sew.P�ye -246' Inst 15'SIS Plea-81' Temporary Canre0E109 to Emig.Inel r G¢ II ibnsl. Ceunsn?e•eIN LYiwray (sec CRS Deg.Na 240) last I2'See.Pate- 148' fnrtaY 12"Saw.Ape- 115' yScndan Pyre 9om Thus_>� at•'� . m; (See Noah. Co 91.9.06-e'03) P.;m Hey. XX To 8e Rannnr_9 Fwlvsing Conpblicn of Remce,hs'r!SUs.� e.o. )< '_ LE 164 @0(M1) Downstream System perrae7ias Rower 71�s: ( '.- ii IL i69.80() 0. I.E. 16?.t10(5) Q Pofanb'd ftti'Ny Canllbfr d9 - a/'•d6 ►ref w. H Pol6cle Fn'cr is Cel$tnrclton - 8 Admiral Hh1f Car.eicf lhsr 4 (sea Oregon std.Cr.g Nc. R0364) r x7 Ji s I° 1 O • ,cr ]HLGT ;n i—Th MATCH LINE o 0 o s_ O 66'99 3'1 I`A'961 p19 N I ( )66•99 '3'I I l,;1. B I1. ..._. m I I 1 • ■ 10.96 I 1 ' -' • i ro/F !• 1 BS�[G • 4 s 1 ' 1 a •I I •f 9G 1 l] • i (MO •'Z01 34 S9 p01 noa 2014 ,,_i I I ___._ ._ ...1—.._ _._- .. ._-- .W •I �/� O u LA'S ! . ., II i-- ....--. ` --F-•-.- f _. _ -:I ---n+ 00-0 ---^--.... I • I / __ . i ri 11•9v1 7/ co' :1 ,AAf3 • r i l I I L+ , T f• d L....._ (S) z'vBJ '1 Dl lm 'nol3 --- .. me 1 r DL+IF OA3 y y I MY,0,+ f o . rl "emir- 7-- v ►9' AI 70 .' . ''S..'—' 'P'r'C'gr . 41 u YL 'NS —.5; a¢ •N Of � � �__.......,_— k -.._- —'an PuIL l- 5�--I L• -t_ Oft ! I .. — c .�9 3Y, !i 0 OO Y,D+ —_..... /I 8 m �5 G r : r 1 FO.►+cr r I to •. _� -/�.. ..._ --._. ..._._.._... .... _.. _._..._.I. •� r Farr •no: SQl I o•-Jol Di I 1 N 0 c ' 2a''61x3-(S) •W I 3' ,..6.'C: , .�7i•bL2�vrr. ... ,L___I_. ._ _ o a^ 1'Lt u# ! sra>.r DA3 1 (3) S$'OL I •i' ,■.,, • I1 • • t• r I I (37 F6 L91 '3'I• a l W —.—.. _...... ....... 'I (NI C6Y•9! '3'1 i ._ k '—+-�. I .J rYr')r •Aal3 1 ,_ ---..—J__:+_.•:' r . . — �t —_...--__—..L__._-- ...J a MATCH LINE ,EC S+NrrT SA I I I I I I I I 4 1 .. ft rPRitru NARY, iNC0MPLET7"ORAIWNGS- NOT FULLY APPROVED er COKRNINC.A/RISOIC710NS YN2 SEE COVER SI-FET FOR ADPJCae4E NOTES AND INSTRUC11ONS. i BRIDGEPORT ROAD / 1 1 I 0w': NO. SU:YINION DATE UY P• LOWER ROONES FERRY ROAD v d UPPER 6OO11E6 SCARY RD.TO 6.W.63 O AVE. - ' WABNRIOYOw GOIWTT Wel I-N la nardtD_,Efi AC •1MA/NAde ONLY • .7,./0-. 111 LEFT STORM LINE PROFILE SHEET I arp—- p4\75Z St•hmIltal 0•= STA. `8P` 26.50 TO STA.'BP` 3450 1 fK .— •plitOrolne,a Rerl.lona 0_ 100/9001 — UOT13111SUO3 ID 1 ZRLO 8bu Nn XVA U,14T J]I tOOZ/EZ/�0 r it k. SKEET ;SD _ MATCH LINE o (4) eD R$ •a't 1 ti I i ( )tig. 3t 1 r II *It"' .4k ___i_ i S I eki. ; L___ .�. - 1 II •-, -- - , Ie : , .� .......-..-_.._.. •. ) 3 ' S I I GM1 .sat 7 ._........_.-, I i PI cet '^eo.DO , H •aIu DO I . w _ i a % bar , I i, w 1 l ll__ 'own G, iorei _i— l.... - -- I r varo.,.o.j I /�: ;� . roye+Tr I I -- --� 0 • L.. ii 1° 4.us _ II 1 I to cr+cr-dqr i , ' �4 N N , j M 5 1 -, t o+: s l .—� I • t r ir .f -1• .-,"' 1 2'-' 1.---- .4._... ...[____, I . _j_ 4.U4 id d ' F 'aMATC, L H 1NE i 0 n e -� c 11 i f t p F X1 ; i,-.° PRELIMINARY.INCIMPLETE DRAMICS.- NOT FULLY APo'RDVED or DOVERNlNG J ssorcnons 8 Ili . SEC COVER SHEET FOR APPLICABLE NOTES AND INSTRUCTIONS. BRI5_SPORT ROAD / Dwc: I . REVISION oesr; RI I•I, LOWER MOONED FERRY ROAD - ! I, map NNW tm.to>~w..1 Ave .- Wes• t 7 WAV.wtou COUNT, !A '£?f m„ In. 1079790_NS /as AL trc t nnvACE • "L RIGHT STORM LINE PROFLE SHEET CHCC tO_ s'■ >ax Submittal g `�STA. 'DP-25+50 TO STA.'a'36+50 _ ---A Dram/.Rewnton. �L1 wtL ou,d ay oa,.,,nn' ,Voa O.. ._... uoTionJlsuo G00/GOOD 0 IOH Z8G0 Su E02 IVA EO Et Hai 1700ti/gti/ 03/25/2004 THU 9:35 FAX 503 "8 0782 RCI Construction ?001/010 RCI CONSTRUCTION GROUP MI General Contractors & Engineers 2c 3 7 Date: 3 •241 • D Sent By: ArAber- To: rf i tt Schet degfex Fax Number: 1(a ' C)-9-E32 Fax Number: (061. 329 Pages: l 0 P1 ease. 'Ma.- 'here. YA..v Q,,, been\ cr\ara es madam ese. ( Bric\cie.p:yr Flans PO Box 231089 Tigard,OR 97281-1089 • Phone(503)968-5941 • Fax(503)968-0782 websI to-www.rci-group.corn Controcfor,ic,7977 An Equal Opportunuy Employer l ME-S71aN i 0.no,._r_ ,uunn O _ A ( / Protect Exlg Parking. . 1 t • e��O \ �,. Prondc Safety Barrie, lil 1 • _ ' 1 � and Sipe Protection. \ 4 v _ \• Peloiv+q flat er i ill, A i•' -s N. - . ,. y _r ShaHr Javr it • �, ,•, 4515.00. I 6 - R=z75'Y•n. -� r: ' s ,�/�'y ,- ''t •` a 17-26-r6 It / ,� � \ . .i Adbst As Needed` /10�l' 1 i Slope IA Canatncllen�r � 2 r -1 `•'� NEI '', � t Sta.378+00.• • a Ten 69.78 f' .gey I_ -�Am' i..t� ‘` X x�. / ,y �,�', Pd ! 1 'i�'sta7afaorteJC :. �F .. , CtC gr.(/(/ , "a. .„ , 1lir% Icy � P �' _ t`—.s •�s7:R3s' 1�3ti!'!vwsw.�.�.. rrr+nom• �.i y.J ko-. 9 02----11 \.- -f". . .. t__,,1: - a'iGi=4° -•�T Av . ' QJtif :���- --- New F e�22 iyw •;t 1 1.,)-, ti El I! -•L,E, •, / SAodQrarrir vrt l 'ti L _- -�'�• -- -- h o L N re-34-37 W J17.72' p °r r` ��••� -� �� -fir.• C.enrhuCf irrgrary orA,cwy t'si 1t1-rs:"a >6 1 , - ___,,-rte,'..,','......._.-..s .-rs2,, '7, � S Set 0/W Berrieack En Stage? 1C'\\i. '• t`i 1r: �4 '± U• :r , \ \ TS E / �t 1 / U o ot 'S;]C-a•_.-�" ` - ----tom - =r7._ Ii (_ • mO = }'O z Progglec! • I I I I j 1. < ig -,--I Pairy� �_ i - r1'7o zt• r •r rs I4' 2' 4 . 2' r,rrr/Ne an.ge11bY i ,-A I I f g i __ l6r - '.RY g ,�74r, I To 2(noes 'ants 1 To•7 Longs .. 36J+7• 1 �_ i l' r' MAW Co si•urticn - ��- 0 1 J••.00'f78,44•o l� i i F ur) Slope Varies• p •72'Fn4hed(reds .--,�.r - See Note 3 25l o w� ' _ 2 ® a T ff . smi sie preen - 1 ' i y �� oav,Ser et.1Na drfe m ,W ,� 2 �� h'1'u 4'To 7.5' Aspr4.Canc.Base Course P 0T o a uyi - -' - -� �—• �t - I { $ w LerJ-S-D�se Goded!MC - r •- -1.aV h'od R•67_-In 2Lie _ I _- FAR E ,m to 1 NM w._6 0 y_� - '`2 Apr".8ese liter/AO Stops I j i" ill i - w Y'-^n ci 12 Propel d LAG N Kama Cen:p. Thin.-8 inch 1 S Pro.•On a �y W x h'otex ` r¢Al -Udine Stage 4 rer-et a o I Coo a Of AO x711 Ow: 0 E Side-Slopes Are Smoot As he SJa 1, d O Noriz ntaf To Vert Gal - Pro a 1.0.00' . ' 0 W►°J Q• 2.CanlmcfrYoySt tuGfatePeky16hereOmby P NW- ' an>.. 3385#0 �Y' ° r WaNd lot Exceed 6'. - i Al.f7.�f79.77 odd Ad st x > - w c^ IC la,,-a (�, O 3.Naldteft Side Gale Slope Fora',To 7?' .180400 38!4-00 3a2e.00 38.3+00 .3.54f 00 ,x53400 386#00 JB7fG0 4 117 Alrenenl cad Mh-at 7.eNGY'fiaishect CZO$ Q Yd Omit of•72"tine. b d - V m i ttt333; p I-' < Q N _'. Netc . G v LT.-. SW LOWER BOONES FERRY ROAD 1.0 o.Mn.•1a►.plmdntdnuTslry Wilk.I�dem-•. m . Q STAGE IA-SOUTH OF"8P'LINE z�*■+�+ed^a•�regea Kh+pm mat.eATnp o6 a `r7 St CIS. 'I A" 3804-20 Ta 5ta. to 384+95 "`"°'t °"'""t°'"di:''°'t"`4.p,.s.d e"7 epen Hu v.1.yd heeA o t loaopo-s eypsM!1 -- Door,nlve..,ina - 1 I Mit ua 2C-6 = E-4 • O 0 CV " Lf G■JI 0 loll,n„ NNIEVI 1YV)8W7lYd 15l, 091 591 SL1 091 591 081 591 091 591 Get 591 091 591 001 591 001 081 591 091 09 081 591 09 09 01 0 0 8- 0 9- 6 9- 09- oor- ^M1 • 09 09 09 09 09 0► 01 14 01 OO+91 0 0 2- sz 9LC 0 0 2- 6 9- 0,- 0 9- 00- 1 09- { 00- 4 GO!- 009- 1 1 Jais r 001 G9 f 1 09 09 02 OS+9Lf 0 0 2- 0 9- 09- Oi' f 001- t } { Or- 001 09 09 09 OZ r SL+9L f O F { 08- 0 b- 09` 001- eat { 00+LL 00! G9 09 09 OZ 0 001 } 07 t t i 09 09 01- 09- 1- 09- 09- 001- 0r sz LL£' 0 0Z- 0h- 09- 09- 001- Ow. 001 09 09 Of" 00+9Lf 0 0Z- Ol- 69- 09- 00t- F r S N O t .1 O 3 S S S O 1 l 0 A V M O V O J 081 581 691 Dal 591 081 Sit SU 091 SOI 091 591 091 Sit 081 581 091 591 091 Sit :1HZ 1700Z/N/0 503°R8 0782 RCI Construction 03/25/2004 Tilt 9:36 FAX 503 °F8 0782 FCI Construction a1004/010 O.' w § a g 5 5 & V 2 5 o 2 N D u 6 5 5 5 —,-, I II II 11 i • 1 u ion- T1-1■P , , 4 - , ... ., . 8 8 1J' i1 II g 1� 11 Ija1, $ 8 1 I • I/ II II •r , - I t, ,, _ ......._L 1 �, ir , I 1 1 A 0 r, o I. ,J U 1 / o c� o a I � J. $. I�2/1/' 0 1 , i�/�11 o pp I I I 8 ./ I 4 8' "� r1- I .o'1 9111 I I I' f'n ,l1 Ir�14-'n % �I,. . 1 j1, w rl,.+6.,4...f ,I11/ 1111,1 .I, 1 ) c1.1'i J� C 111 S4, ' lei p' s ~ 61I,. I. i 1' . _I 11. 1 1 TT 0 b`-� b l 1 C n i t , ig C y �. rf a Ei I II 11 111 ,1I) rh �.l W (N (..r C.a C.+ o . ." 4 o' . : v o ,,: .. o o '0k' + or ,411" u, ''I ! 14 , �� °'li_f�! I' � ',,I. L° I� U I o Ch 01 ■ I�' I . I. ! 0 I. 1 kJ ll 0 • 0 • o.l 1 ill o I SI o' 1 1 I'� o . it • x 0 ,TTit7.r.. I i tO b 111 a s s . I 0 ,I , - S ill , s ' —_ $ r' 1 to I I 1 I In I p t p� O �i"r--. s $ $L 11. ` , 8 r 1,, 111 lei- $.� r Ill 111 I I 8 �, , nnl IIr ~ L I , '■ �f , " , 11, , ,) 111 .1 1. � 111 I1..1 1 z g I o � $1-,-L.— a J . a ' 8 �Y II I1 D Trt I1 , r1�, R]-IL' ,r. ,I,,,, $ . , hl ..�"r..,• V ' i ( I, I A III I Ill ,( II11 I. Imo... r.r a I, 11 g ,I ,, g 8 !� 1, $ . ,� § I1 ) ,''+'-17` g , ,,. 1y pJ�1-W. I mmI I pI 1 p I p1 , �. =p1 �p 1. 1 �y -�p y �... p1 ap1 ,�p b a 6 5 I 5 5 G Q O 5 U 5 G V 5 B R O 5 n A MINMY.INCQUALE7r DRAINS-NOT FIA..h Y APFROIED OV aotipw HIC.URisoenCwS I s=. SEE COVER SWEET FOR A PUCABLE NarES AND INSTRUCTIONS. ,_-3, BRIDGEPORT ROAD / I NO. REVISION OATH BY APP LOWER BOONES FERRY ROAD - - owc. x a U*R,N BOOZE.FERRY NM TO LW.LII1E AK. QGMN /Ni%I[,R� ■ 4 y 7 wA$*IYTON 0Otw11r POPO N$ ROADWAY CROSS SECTIONS la 1. Jill 5 STAGE 1A - 0 L.1\aMff/iffl2=f1FR■IM17 sl. 03/25/2004 THE 9:36 FAX 503 °;8 0782 RCI Construction ]005/010 _ E a V t .4 ° 6 V N 51 $ * O 5' W $ 6 E N G $ t u ff, u $ * O u r 1 , , �• r I ' 1 t{-ITT Wit I Il lr r rri I' I 1 I / i IINK c, t., .4.....4. ,. ..„ ,,,.......„ ,.. ,.„, ,,,..,„ , , mi ,4„.......„..4....„ , ,,,,„ i, + 1 l / I J , e1 , IT 'ir ',�, 1 rl.,I , f ( II ! + 1 1..—+- , 0 4l1 . $ r a 1 , a' + 1 t t o r rl r a, ` , ., — a 1 i t r,, Il ii c IY/I'.--1-r—' III , In ,I / 1, 1 I 1 XJ 1 t I�, I il ' I ,r',-4-r+ o 1 ��,r , ,r I' o ∎ C . .1, ..,4. o l, s 11' „ 1 1 1 , I , 6.. 11 I ,.II�, , u , 1 -, 0 II l ' ° r • 9 0 '1" It ti O .i O , n 3* O ; I, O I' ;IN 1 ZI* ��� C. V ° 1 r. I�0 7 N �. o u, i 0 1 cn o cn t fy.,I T 1, . I, I�.I - r r r h I A I xi t It , „ t-. ' i ' 4 , 4- i r it." N e ' 1, v t,..., , 11 1 I .., '' I ' I ' ' I(ri11I 'r II 'II Orr"� Or „I .{ -�, 1 I fq a If 11.1.1..,,.,. 4 a' , '{'l ' '' s 'Rt •IN' t IF o i J ' ° T IE) rr„1 . 1,r, r 't„ .a ' , 11, , �., r 111 I jj I q� 11111 4i/d O !+ '1 Itt 1 I O '/ ir'J11,1 I 111 °f, '' r I` - O , , pO �/ I1 ,4,r.., ,�(C•. -1 '1 iim .! L ., Ill , I L �� a : --r"-- $�' r" ,, '' a aii ���'� 1r11■�1��f , 11 -1 TT r I , , I , ' , , I• '� iii I r,f 1 ILIA I $ „ J I �' $ n Writ ,tl 1 g I 8'rte 1 „ , g 111 I ,. ' ERE q 1. v.� •• e . ..�...1�p..,1� uI „t lilt �iy,i„1pU ilb I Wulf.II !1 II L_ _.IJ.I_. 6 G O a N i 91 y * G O $ R R a. t a O a w $ a $ {bp G 8 w 6 N t la PRELANNARY,p4COMPLFt'E ORAWWCS-NOT FULLY APPROVED BY OOVERNJNO AMISDtCTONS ii SEE COVER SHEET FOR APPUCABLE NOYES AND INSTRUCYION5, I �� BRIDGEPORT ROAD / DWG; NO. REVISION DATE BY APP LOWER (MOWS FERRY ROAD - M i BO urrl�sOO+IfA m .a oN TO S.W.Balm AVE. PEW j.IT,41 H R w�FERRY no e.o.m.', I la moo ..ill”! , A ROADWAY CROSS SECTIONS MUD STAGE IA - —fa 75s .mtPaJ —1-- la , A /aaunn Pd PermJfa _rl/ar J 03/25/2004 THU 9:36 FAX 503 0g8 0782 RCI Construction 2006/010 u $ Ii i u u $ 5 a g al t g a a g u g g u a E 8 M u a S a N _ $ �,,�� s sue. s� ■ $, , ,� t 3 o a ,.� o ' , ` I 2 1 / 1 I 1 T o �� o I o 0 2 if i t r � Air --�'*—"'"''� , /_I �'1� (_.."--Lt..,i'—r; ' i r //,/ , , i 11 i? ' O / - 0 1 I 4 o // 441 ili , 1 / . ru w ■ �u I / _k N .11 1, ra Q 0 0 0 o J o v 0 Ks us us co w ` c., w c., co co N 4. O J�, v o f ! k t H Co 4 � j P m I I y I / -1 I 1 .1 0 �` 1- I ' t rI'- ti '1 ' +" ., „ , I Z o I U,"f 1 1 O . ,. I , • I, a 1.a a . �. a i a '1I .... Ij.--rte-- a ■, - , . . • , ' - L I 1 $ 1‘., I 8` Il , . g I g $ 1 8 1 - L 55525 5adgg 5VdE5 aogag a55g5 55551 M e Ii y�� PRE7lARNARY.INODMPLETE DRA N1ND8-NOT I•U�LY APPROVED DV COVERAPNC.R RISOlC17 4S J ill SEE COVER SHEET iOR APPUCABI.E NOTES AND INSTRUCTIONS. BRIDGEPORT ROAD / Dom; NO. REVISION DATE BY AFP LOWER BOOING FERRY ROAD -- 1,�a K= WPM�oo„ea SHINY ON O TY WOO AVE DAM ,i�l CO$ WASHINGTON S SE .Aft . 3 $ ROADWAY CROSS 3ECYlONS _,A� t STAGE 1A NCI.]! 3.7m 03/25/2004 THU 9:36 FAX 503 "R8 0782 RCI Construction 8007/010 i u i d g R u '$ $ i u a a a o 8 a a E 8 a 8 a a o a g .,-.0.* E— .. „ i) t ,,,, I., 4. ., i , ,/, i r, 7 7, '-, ' A I / `f I 1. T- ,--•-- ►•— ----.I „ r I I I 1 O r • f . I 9f-mow, i r i'' al t� I O 1 O 0 . ,,,,.I,, 1 I I T 11 , i s r I ' �i ■ I / / o , � 6 6 I a r �/ , I . . , Co d S 1 r IF42i w a 'j..1� I {N o 1�,1_ 1 , 4 ° oats + ° ,! , i + ° f6'...0 ,: c't : , I I Y ,,,� ♦ , , -1 111 ' I n I' /r"...T..., o�. 1 , ti r 1 `, .� o a 0 CO „ I ` L CA t ,A —1-4_, t i- t''1 , c , -4 , - 1 a / — m A. r n a -,, , -,, a r 1 ti"- a r „—r a i t t" , -i ,I —6— I 0 �„ A j I 2 0 % ' ` 'I ' • a ,1' , y a` , ' • a ., 1r,.li, a4- I , t.., I I . , 1 41 I 1 8' ' 8 '/ I I -- , 'g —I `g -rte-- g I 1 I I , y i y m rp �y_ bij ■�p i ti b y, N ii {II 8 F. IJI 3 i O 1a N a a V a G $ N a E a E a a a i - --A, e e M PREUMNARr.INCOYPIIIT ORANINCS-NOV FULLY APPROTfv BY COYERNINC JuNsaCTICNS x l i SEE COVER SHEET FOR APPLICABLE NOTES AND INSTRUCTONS. i BRIDGEPORT ROAD / REVISION LOWER BOOMS FERRY ROAD ��. ® Ili 9 NC if UPTIN DOOMS FUMY NO.TO NO%MD AV[ CO= WASIUIOTON COUNTY is 8 ROADWAY CROSS SECTIONS mean =mom �rEN 6 STAGE 1A - a =ins CC 03/25/2004 Tilt 9:37 FAX 503 °R8 0782 RCI Construction Z008/010 1 I11 ril� in, r In , r Hirt,^ - rT-1iY.''—,1Trn— ..,,�. +. , g, .,� ,I a 4_ g_..4... , I . , 144 .)Iy 1 , 11 1l' Ilh-t -r'.� 1, ��.. ,. --,-- 1' 1 ` it I II, a, It, it i'" IIII i i i l 1 $ 1 ' .,,-1. i r- I 1 1 . 4 --kr,+^+-4 .11 I ., l' . , --r, I 1 I $+."' 'Ili'•. f Ao c ' ' I l' ■ `...+T ' �� ��1 ,(3 14, 0 ►I'r1 1 1 n1� u In n I�r ' _..(,...ter.. �- '1 ,T"Y` }, �.,,1. l .1, Ny," H11,,,(,t„ � � O ' ' ' S �� S rfl I� nrll�� 1 0 ■li il,lr Im,J R"7l' 1�..,..-�'� a '1. .1.. .�. ° / 1 I 1 1 J I O I I ° rb 1 , ,, ,,I, ,1r ��� I 1 d k,. in t0 d to / O 1 '�` �I l 11 I�r, ,ii T�I i 1I 1 r r (rl �! ! • I 0• 1 ' : — 8 r , ..H' r '1 0 \V �j.i 1 k k 11, •� r / I , 1, 1 0 III r-1', I;H' II 11 ' ' 1,0 ,1 pr r III 14^ ,4 1 j I `I CA co . i \ f� , 1 w 7 1, (. I I„ "7 I I , In WI 1 ill ill ed 1 II ill Il. 1 1 , fl: y 0 O , I f ., 1' f ' 'f rt' 4..".. /r I CO 8 '11 , 4- r ' 3 a ► I IT 111i " 8 `�,I1-rnrr' 8 4-1-I 1, ,l ■ ,1 8 A I ',..1 i ', � L, -I �, 1 I,^ ■ ■ 1. I ,1.t1r" „ ,. „1 p ,��I,II l , I ,),I Ilu,i I , I I 1 I A. . n° 11" II n nil 71 0 „, rJ ' IIt,Or ${..- 1 i, 1 g ., ! 3 1.- 1 a� , 1 1 I' q� pp 41st ,.p III .1 _L.LI., , IgII tl,I L yi p L ,` y .y. ,.p iy U V N O f3 3 8 3 O N 3 O 3 3 `A 5 $ 3 O G 4, s G C a a V N O —T ! M eg 8`— PrtEUMINARY,INCOMPLETE DRAWN=-NOT FULLY AOPRo1eo BY COVV N Na.,umsOfOTlONS ' SEE COVER SHEET FOR APPLICABLE NOTES ANp IN5TRUCTIONS. � BRIDGEPORT ROAD / DWG: NO REVISION CM DY APP 1 LOWER BOOMS FERRY ROAD X A UPPER IIOOIrO TIOUIY O.TO I.W.MD AVE. -ten <A+ WA1HYgrON COUNTY A a e ROADWAY CROSS SECTIONS OEM STAGE !A U ,;I 7bx Submit td 1a VC 03/25/2004 THi. 9:37 FAX 503 "R8 0782 RCI Construction fI 009/010 O. ow • 55u 55E 5 I E 5 5 E i E it agg owe 1 rl , ,1 ----r- 7 • 1.--r- ■ •• •• " -f '' I I ■a.L- a a l I ! II S O � O 1 y C T S O 1 O I °d 1 I 1 I 4. c *IT c _ 6 , 1,, o ' 1 . c , , c 1 " !1 c ,, ■ I I—I 1 I 1, fir' _ �. o T � W MIIj O CO NT c. 1 0 . ,,,! U1 i cn 0 1.,J U 0 u a, r rn r '7,1_,..c:' 4 1 !cll. D Iv (.71 I V„ $ clvn I 0' I o I I n O r "1 tit_ + LID IVco Co f 1 L,,' • 1, . ' .I, I , �I Ir m I { liN 0 c _ i 1 i/^ -I I , ! i +f,1 1 f T Z, I I I CO 11 I If i c 1 -1...11 a m I . . ■ v pp. I s it H 8 G N E N u $ E N $ 1 5 1 a I E i E i O O E O . f K P REL/ANNARY,INCOMPLETE ORAM4NCS—NOT AILJ,Y APPROVED Dr GOVERNING.R1RININCAONS I l i i SEE COVER SHEET FOR APPUCABLE NOTES AND INSTRUCTIONS. BRIDGEPORT ROAD / DWG. N0. REVISION DATE BT 11rr E LOWER SCONES FERRY ROAD W. UPPER�Cp1E AUMW 1Q TCONTY �7RD AVE. • .,�r/4 v d ROADWAY CROSS SECTIONS G CPC �'{ 7�a�uemlltd a/e. p STAGE 1A hw.nr for Pwv lei •Ve3 3 - Sax PPEIIYOIAFY re011ET MGM.TYPICAL SECTIONS DESIGN O Lb,2004 a.' .—r co STA."72"84+3635 To STA. "72"86+10 LEFT(Intersection) —1 o STA. "72" 84+20.91 To STA. "72" 86+10 RIGHT(Intersection) t PEgg c 1-" ii R/N r RA/ 31 .e '19• s<.N,rersaron 0r{o)r Sheet ip (_ f 6' 6' 17' rr r I r 72' C to 6' Ybrfes 2d, T. r ' • �• ,p Yney'rSi�S� e3.°•'+313.'6e�2ke.:ism--N4W2!:. kW.r&dr�_._6'PES•f. V.i�•nFi. Stri:>a•' iild "':. ?ie&TSS` -.�-. i_liii Asph.Cone Wearing Cowes Mph.Ccoc 811»Course ".^� I Leid 3,T/2(rich Owns C}m+ed AWAC hone tro0r! leaet 1-0ense Graded iiWAC L �iv�.-v`r.. .' Norm 711kn.-2 Sio'1 Peal OVRclaon Nara. Thin-7'ha 3 LAI l S.rOW dlr Ceorasile r-1-1rrr and SLaDBzotfon Per C001 Staadord SSecifxxlicos H 3 003.50.42 ®�/f) 3..N Aggr Bose, -.,-.1"-'''-'—' �.��� v SW 72ND AVE. S Comp. O For cab t Qr17er Dera;See)rash.Co.Org.A .CS-}pp Thrn-winch N O For Sflaus'k Deems,See Wash.Co.org.No.CS-305 STA. "72" 86400 To STA. "72"87+74.51 o F Q For Standard Qat', See Oreg0a Sid.Org.No.Ro700. to 0.4 Sea Srperebwrke 0isyan,Sheers 7A And 0.4 Qs Far taaxa4 See Q'agon Std.0rq.Na.RD714 Sacfia,C-C $ > n =-, 4 O H + o z RAY i RAY 4J 4R,, i. U I ST • O a' 6' 4' 77 lr ii°1 v T I Y r2' rT a 6' 4' 7 0 �4,� � . �°� 0l 11 10 I � o 131- . . . . SL HYie.7 s terser t ray°'rt"•i �`-irs. :a�?-. im`_s�• 3it :.ot;_Oe+°h�:1Ysw $='�a '`�iLf�.i'�cw.h A A cv 00 ^r a k 4 C--- Profit Code e 1 ^��„��.� 0. 0 4 y Pan[Of RbMLrae 0 Sulgrcde GeolexL7e �� R N cc 2 2 W . OPd SLeGIizeFar Per COOT Sicodcrdp 1 °� *eci!icirhon 001x70.42 G2S> 2 < oi k 2 Z Cr SW 72ND AVE, I. 20e-90,11.7 AV Steon As c,7 Ha(zenld re Waked 2 i N Q c 3 rrw>► p arm STA. '72" 87+74.51 To STA. '72" 91+58.83 Cr a 0 a 4 Z 4 Cif "--1 ova r` .;a H231. �CL, r--- C -1 i U3/31/10U4 ICED 11:30 FAA 503 0781 RC1 Construction __......-- 4001/005 RCI CONSTRUCTION GROUP General Contractors & Engineers Date: 7)31 ) 01 Sent By: mb To:Moct 5,11 ,c( Fax Number: 6-03 . 9 . C-48 2 Fax Number: b8'g- ?z q -4 Pages: 5' T V v e avf ek( p o, cs -� Rsed piar,s ( 5 sA qe-P t Zoc d , � ou need Or. cos � 1 ed Ip lease me a cc4i■ 5�*(08591 1 PO Box 231089 Tigard,OR 97281-1089 - Phone(503)968-5941 • Fax(503)968-0782 website-www.rcl-group.com Contractor Lie 79377 An Equal opportunity Employer �V„ ':s r y! F=.F. _ ' •�'r ,?'-t-. 2 Q Y' ,XX� - � P L A N N u S H E E T W i c zP r a.ibFF�.Ki a os- 1 OE 5IGN® W.1004 ' e 1..C7 p See atl `See Shte!1 OO© 1f ll 9 A O ` © 4 41 Q 4 O T y !, F ��'�� �� - I t 1 i . . , . t 1 - /b? 3]+80.C5= ~2 r � tC � 4L" Lins• 'C `? r 12SOr12= �a o � d .. 7rp Ease-Fv8 Aroc 4.7 ; >1 I c`c a z c _ • --�mase0 1- 11. r T`F g �( •g - --- F^ • C in � ( � a p 4; m .. im ,3y j ,0 - !'• �a i. / � _ _ l. ( C t _ _"„. • _- .� _ - o _..... .. i i.a._= -`J. 7y .-. --o I >4 3. 5• 5' 5l� _ x 7R 123. gq rcu IZ o -'r- c- .. � o aH.CLOWER 9OONE S FERRY ROAD ( a...2-,'lit ot o o ----7-. o va-J 15, :177 - 12'-52' i i R$x 42s- � • ' ` U G Saw�e Line P /µ. R15 -1 17�I! ;a �_ �I - �^ _' 1 __r • t•r •n--T` T.2- ..w� :. .1, J c al _ .6tadti qL TF n; - � � � ' (FJ o-- __ _ - --- ..iQ - , / =_, : . )• • 1311,43+24.97 . � z, oL. fR6r6S31 -Grsg linit • y --• • r� ' f o ' tam QaG- , IbCXm e 8 _� -,, U- , • P" LINE - : r :% /I / C F O of Z !e /, O icl) , O � ® !' s 4 z• O 1= O 00 4 0 p 4 o .G JO F-' s 5 wD(" Une 9L Line ® SFa 'RP-J445J par RC) Re•naee Eg. 12" Q Sta. ''Sr..34418(536'RE) ' a� f2 St Pipe. -370' >_O Sta. '5P-33+83(516'L.) ® Sly. '46+00(65.5'U.) Coast Type '0-2'Intel CansL Type C-2 Inlet ROADWAY A107ES y� Ccnst. Type -C-2"Ants( Ink_ 12'See. P.Oe- 25' © Ste "P-P.49+12.60(6R 1'LE) ConaL Precast Basin, 18'Deep Z O CcrsC T 'C-2"lrtel U O1 Canal. Sidele aR AinL t2'Sew_Ppe - 3Y tnsl. 15"Sew e- 123' (=�' g�'a std.LYy. f:o. .RD361) Ccnsl.kanYaa .i!t Wet c Pipe (See°regal Std. Org.Na 170360) (See G-ogcn Sf d.LYg. Ho.RO7T0) (See Ore Sld. LA-g_M. RO35<) (S,a 0, cn Std. .W_80:64 fr•sl. 72-Sew.P.te -253' 1 ' e9 OM )& Sta. '�='41+00(516'RI) (Sea Deegan Std.Org..Ra.80348) u ' Caner. T e F2'thief Abak4an Gl S:c. gP' 41rO0 56.3'L7. Ste. RP'<7+25 (55.0'C!- i.e.Fj a Shah 7dca.� 2 ' 1 CansL Slandad Cu•5 E=T { ) ( ) (_See LYcpai Sid"Gry. Ns-P.Ii700J Ccrsl. Toe CG-3'taet C.V. Tyre '0-2'.Wet Cmsf. P,eaaf 9,,,„..O !6'L 0.2 p Can _ tic thaw w50 Wet U.) < _ {Ser Ragan S(d.a'9. lia RDJ64) Canal kan�Ue with 5 !!*c ere kf n Shawl V) ]q oc c� CV S E �'Sew.P.ye -81T inst. 13'Sew_Pipe- 55• Inst. 15"Ser.Pipe- 6T O O ConsL Canc.isiond. Type A ( a'9i Sio. Org.No. 60372) (See LPegen S!d Q•q.No-FD364) Rau•.nect Storm Crein Ferr.ae Tree Shane FT.,rx 0 �i Qe (See CYegan SFQ prg eta RpJ46f < (See LFega,Ski nq• ma-Rajas) sta. RP's7,ro(41.5'RL) Sta. 731--'37+00(EA 3'.RL) n c°, o p o Cans!. Srandcrd Storm Sewer Ma+,Ue Const Type F2"Intel © S:a. '$P"43+70(E9.2'Lt) Q Ste. 'ho'47:50 54.4'?t. Q Carl. S'ckndk Ramp - { ) -- See anger? Oyer City. 21'Stem;Ate Iski 15"Sew,P.jpe - 90' Chat.NacFa's with,Y:ef Ltnst. T . .S-2'Anlet Col j w e a z. ( Sa't Std.Ek¢ No_ 80760) ksl. !8'S:w. P e - 70• z �^ p>•3 m [nat. f2•Sew.P(ae - f2 (See Oregon Std. 11o. ROJE4) t' Cana:.Pte-Carl Resin, 18"Creep Cfh}7tAL IeUTF'S! ¢ei=F i R.in E!. 76782 (Sea Oregon Std. Q•q.,\'a. RCy318) (See [Vega, Std. 4(L ' OS Const. Conc.-Wand. Toe A H Orq. Na RDJd4) s, W AE. 767-40(5) Connect fa Ex kanba'e AY SC or0 Picas to be Casa ii Ate'!. Z O to o u W L.; (See( esnei Std O . Ilo. 80705) () �' ® Sla. EP' 454-20 (67.0'Et) Q Sta. 2'P' 43450(380'RC.) O'r.7ess Oteenrise Ider,tyfied. ~- ='� I.F. 7EL35: IV c'xt¢ test. 13'Sew. PVe - i3' 2 6 1nsL t?'Sew. P. CmsL Type "C-2'M'af Can't Standard Starn Serer ky,ta'e ,? 1-Mgt R t N O STORM Sf71£R ROTES (See 6a�cn Std. Org. Ns. R0336) ps - 67' Inst. 73'Sew.P-a- T9' Over q. p Fa Gab Arfum seta Tcbrn,5:4-Shia 56 O 2'e Z LC'7 k' £1 12'Sturm P-e 0 7 c- Sta. 'R°'J9h46(3.T.6 L!') 9 Sfa '6P"444-00(57_6'LI.) ® SIc. 'Ba'35+07 (536'2J.) (See CYegsn 516. L4¢ Ne.817364) Msi. 7T Sex.Pica- 16' _ 4 aO i S u�i iQ - Ccnat. Toe 'G-2 AZ'el '/41.'" Rh Qtr. f7Q 74 ul'S 94E7 S7614`y' /.V 9ri+EO a. W O a • + i Canal. T ;,-2'Thiel K 7EGQ(l_4 NAGS OK + d CansL Type 'G-?'Wet ys`e Q Ski- 42+50(564-12.) LE. 165.SS °` V mesa a'D-s ....4f A-mt. 12'Sew. Pte- 42• AnsL t3'Sew. P.',2 - 79' ,Net. 12"Sew. P(ae - 32• CmsL Type 2`C-3'Wet (S) c (See ha7cn Std- 0.^i,. Na 80364 AE. 765.181 M Div ) (See(Vegan Std.!Vg- Na R0372) 1 / a Canned to Erl?. 75- (See Oregon Std. /L. h173b< ) (Sea Oregron ski h'a RD3E<) h..1 m e C (See CA•epan Ski a9. No- AU364) ® Mince 0 CannK, fo Frig_ uanEa'e r na A4crbate Inst. 7Z"Sew. P'e - f3' �• Ste. o' ( ) 8 Sta. 'EiP"43+18 (536'Lt..) fie- O < �) (See G egsn 516. Org. N� R0360) C o. d <1+&0 5E.3 LL J u LE. 762.94(5) Gees!. Tyoa 'CC-J'An'ef Casl. Tyco-G-2'Inlcl 4 ; ai �� LE. 739.9(7+ (W) Ext¢ !not ,L'•Sew. Pipe - JO' toot 12'Sew-PO - 62' E e. --- +tie,,.� ,_.� \.. (See arg on Std. OFg. Ile 1717372) (Sea C-.9cn 516.Org. Ard• 80364) fie,.«. o..,. r 5 = 7 4--1 03/31/2004 WED 11:31 FAX 503 "", 0782 RC1 Construction 4003/005 . . e MATCH LINE 38+50 l § al xc IN.E. A 7. .. & g a T 4 -g 4. . .4 .:. 4. _ _ )gr's.s.:11 :.3v;I:i . 1 ii _ I 4 •J• I ... 5•Tul 5.,a 3gi.L• ' 1 . .• . 1.• a 1 -t- 6K3 ( tog i ..TI: (3)oo•-sq."7 7 s•;-,. . . ..----------- ,, VOOD S 4G-EV_ AN3 ,Id il•73 - Sli I Li •.i. I a10-1... ,.I 6 .__............. 44, _, 'KZI:r_: is L• ON_ + ''• 1/YRE' - , ! -11. 1 ‘,.,_1 .,_ [pas pouco. ion (+64,1.03 %sr . 00+PC .e.s.Lri 113-004 I .• ;. I 'l I -I IP I wt., -, .. . eiv)-oo t.:37• I ,,_.ig•zof ua• op/ , , o a i : I m m P. poi (i+ . ' 33 a-a + • ---.•-- r •--1.----,:. .• • 2_ . )ll'i" I J•t fa fill ! (3 69n, '31 4 4o• 1 ,C ; I •0 z 3 1004 4. Z.... OZO• C rr i01 AP' XI ' -....----"'---9j;q• '- . 'k . •--MP'rr.i.'- .-44,-iivrvi .3:/-iiiiii -• • -...+---.. . 4,i'f'T' ' '27"11 ...._• 1.:.;.' I I ' ra 1 01,Y•I A01; 1 .z,rc.leg, ../. .001 1111111.t 4-5 I . r; F■P -IZI 1) , 1 i I r , ,, i! /.. •Rt 4-1--.I /I . In 1 (A4' IG*C91 'XI lb F. I (2 16't91 •3 "4. 0 11 . 13 e 2 .,„ 8 _.. .. I BI'.L wai.,7 + Ilk 1st C ' "linui , • it . __, +,;',* - ' bl" rn :II ' P. . r• : ... ' • 1 al I ZI i I (3).1gZ.V:v:41 .11 1.1 li 114.'L.1__.._.. _ 8 IN a 1 al I i, 41.1N--...3--- .... i 7 ft, • • r .,. -- 21 i I - . Of i %oat 11 i q 1 vrest N‘•1.1:001. I ,o1 '. X liqui . 11 7* i 004. 1 1 tir ' rn II 4 m 1 93 . • • II -I • . 04 scr9j 7.7 I a_ a . I & . 1 j;I 1' ( )WIT 31 -- va 1 oi • 1 .74 ' wz , i ,_1-- I . I ' 'I )91.0.1 '37 -1 ..,il 3 In I IP , ,r, . .: : _in 9.{..A.1.4.-202. I•-E. -I .3 (N):-...01 •^.•.!• • 1 r + r fr I 1-::31-" P,P, EtC,I. ' na ,,..,/, • I M t I ° - : 79:: . ..---.1 . .... . . rr4'. ____i_. 2' t -i-4 i -1 co..- ... 50.1L I '••.PO , Pt* ,, 6 7 *66 I I- , )---fololig•coc..41021■111. I .1 tVi I•71.- . ' Lt-o. t . .. I ■ , ;t J.,. ' m t•tt i :] i§., I 1 m ' 1 r- 111 . L, ... ..,,. r, i , ,-7' : r-- 11 1 . ::: :1:: ------- ' ' 9V+.91., H : I • ( Sig'k9A • AP • Ii ... .. 1's' "I* + 4. , ,, 1 1 il . . 4,. - ! ,t.,, _i_...1„, .6:._...., I: r._...._ ..i_.-4,.._.. , , , , ....... )Lir. L.,1,..0.,. ...,, [ _ . op ! m 8 i ..1 61,L.41 AP 001 t b S _f I • d 1 0 ! a . 100. at '37. 1 I • i 1'1 1---.... • (2)tC•at *31 -. • ,sit-I ill v -- 8. 1 1 FP33? I)00 . I 1 ••• I r7 1 0 1 -- , -, . •13 --^157' , . z•R 1 46 1 o - 1 4.4 •Fl I _.._ 1 j 1 • I 01 31 Hr •moo ç3+- -■ , : I:" 71 r : 8. igi i li 1,U I .... ,,,,, reei i a 1 I I i 1 j -..741 • •••....,..- 1 I I I I 1 -F..1... 1 . . .....,_ Ili__•••• ..........",.. ,•: :,:„,":4-4:•••.1. .i...;\ • . 1 _..4 i : : moll 4 • :<1 r- I ' 1 ' 1 8. -- ... "- - '''z--- --1--t---- ,0414* • -- • • •-• (At; 64v _ % ■ "'rri k , ,.,•-: 1 , , I (2) ersil • 1 \ , 1 u zi I •AaL.7 I 01 ; , f PM/dirt Ini _. • ..- XI & 1 ' 1 1 i , i i , 1 , L -1- -•. •. , - _.1--.. -%.t.. ". . . - - , , . . ..... .. __ MATCH !.NcTE.:,A 0I+5 II . - -1---- ! MATCH INE 50 50 I .--7. • 4„ is s 4 3 Ir.,*fill' 't*_. ... a a OI - i cEE_IL,E.F1 Pi 1 • 8.. ., .. o g § o Z1 O PRELIMINARY.INCOMPLETE DRAINNCL5-NOT FULLY APPROVED BY GOVERNINC JLIRISDICYRJAIS n 121 t... EF.E COVER SHEET FOR APPLICABLE NOTES AND INSTRUCTIONS. - . BRIDGEPORT ROAD / PWC: NO. REVNLON DATE OY..!F ". ..-- '... „„ LOWER BOONEE FERRY ROAD .._....... . .. ft ,...m.;wawa FERRY RO,TO B.W.Ina Ave.. _i'.iiii in VON ..t4S.. 5 IA r. WARMIOTOR COUNTY ALICKDAYE.W....te iretifrAINAGe oh&r la 7 P PROFILE SRBET pm----••'.r..-0 75 X Svotrifttai J/04 ...., STA.'Br 36+50 TO STA. "Br 50+50 a :••••• Drainage eokelan$ rinilleagefi For Permit, ,V03 ' , ' • . . ' ' " o PLAN SHEET jciprovativ �s%aeEs1GM1uRT °e7/E.t'.n6S - M .2601 ) �r R III 4 R.Q S �aacg lkntt "BP" LINE t it g6a ;; Iiflj (ar) let ill N a...: `, _. - --.i...:,..4;:; ! 4 I I . • iU r2"-r -rte L- •2--17 .. '",'1•-- - .. 3. `??EY1 Serener Lhe -- o � �� El 7:;18:43 _. - -z}+t.t -�r :zd's'%)' 2- 7s0.�e R��► r:r"=` END OF PROJECT 7 977 '"r �� STA. 8P" 56-1-33 _ m o o Z •'� &I) 0 < 4-> v. ROADWAY NOTES STORM SEWER NOTES: CITERJL.NpTES rc r CURB RETURN DATA TABLE Au sm,..P;,rs to a pass Y R'Tp a z 0 Cons} S; Ore. RI Sta. '8a'56+01(58.5'U.) , Unress Otherwise 1den V5ei. >•- a •�� 4-) (See COOT art Na.RD72D) Coast. roe.6-2-Wei T,0.G y a t� Coast Precast ub- r8 De O CURB SrARD14 D ELEV. DELTA i 2 1 •�b O Coast.St o,dod YuJ e.Y Ceneeet!a FersGtg 12-Sew type • P_G BP'52+3362 5aO 9' 172.13 2 g O (See al.Na Ina AD7DD) (See 6!07 Dr9.ha R0304'L.-) r,4A '8P'52+47.13 5244' 172.27 _+ () Caul SWira'i Romp 0 Sea. 'P 51492(486'LL) A r/2A 8P'52+58.83 38.41' 17244 3'5.00' 870+01- �"L.(Sheen n mss' X I ao I.:„) (Se*OlifiT Ory.No. Cws& bps'0-2'Intel y RD7SS test. 12"OR See.PNe- T2" 3/4A "8P'52+6714 6398• 122.71 Remo-Ti*e S:sea Aar 3 tIanwmen l Bar (See LG01 LMg-Na AD3364) P.T. 'BP'52+70.83 8273' 17.119 a �F Q trot 11 (See 000r Qrg.Ra t = 50 Anil) "d°"53}218? 7006' 17243 Dot �. LS See Meet 5 ®' Slo. '8P'51+7637(4d6'it.) 1/4A Aa"53+2875 61.46' 17294 L+ y.+ p + CGnst. ripe'G-2'hart 4i +�, © Cans!.Comr.e'id Ortisesy .hsL 12'D.t.Sew.J.be-15' 8 1/2A °"53+37.74 5x74' !7267 .1500' 645776" �+ v Oa 0- (See V&A Co.Deg.h'a D19-20.7) (See COOT Drg.Na P17394) JAN 73P'53+f7.15 31.86' 177.53 w �C. P.T.• EP'53+57.29 3252' 172.47 '2 �^ p> ® Sts. ')?P'31+OAS5(486'LL) P G 55*8976 58.40' 17AS4 �- 0 W c a W j Z S IA...,W s- Canal Type 'C-2'Mier VIP BP"55+02.10 6D.L1B' 17A4! ` } s q O n Cans!.Prwasf 8auh, 18'Desa C 1/7e 9P•55+13.95 64.30' 110.69 55.00• inroo' ee W y r • (Sea OSOr Drgl Ns P.0364) - 3/46 '6P'56+24.48 71.04' 121.68 O 2 Fi = P.t '�"58+3378 7930' 177.35 - A'rh�5 WET S1A11o1'D/AV 99hFD 0. W p i -j '�+� P.C. 'P'Sr+07.78 3660' 1733D !CP.GQA.� M ONLY 0fp ;a. 2 1/tA '8P'ar+L5.52 38.63' 17036 1 •�nvr m m 0 r/7A �P'31+17.28 49.34' 179.30 5.60' 115;:6'40' _,,� O 3/IA 't1P'31412.Of 4272 17920 [. .y p r P_7 '6P'314 f 1.SJ 43.17' 174.C8 4A d�,a� W o I..... b,... I 343T IC >a w 03/31/20U4 WED 11:31 FAX 503 P"" 0782 RC1 Construction 4005/005 .. ____ . ,....... . . . . ..____. SEE SHEET SA SEE %CET 5A SEE SHEET 5A MATCH LINE 50+50 MATCH LINE 50+50 MATCH LINE 50+50 "i § t ---i---- ■ : i ; -- !. I . . • 1 . 641 z 4 . 6 !, •, gal ---- •- -..---1 , . i I 1 (3.)g 'ROI 37 i i F. i 14 ' 'I C '•.'CZ t 81.7 002 P • (s) r•Inn 7. _ . I i L___1__. 0,f,*si ..7,4 i aG Lu .,....7-_-_,_ i i .. a I 11 fit' i Og .1 - " -- -,•- , . )KV•1 71.jil ; ' Ll 1:1. __......-_ -- ,v • , . 1 ...-- ,...`, rt ,- ORR 11•04. I r I IT, I •,, _...; 2_ . • . L- I 1 r- I . f 1 t 1 i I t ..... 0 , 4 .....z.. gl.7rZgL a f 1 rn :3 cl., I'"• - - '" ' —1----'4"- : '- -- L. i I ,, Et, ii , • .,. , , , _ 1---- . 1 I , ,; --/ —1 , ,co .-:, ., — - . --.1----— ,:-..1-- -5‘ • I : -,, . .....I i. : • . ,,„ H.7 1 8 I I ii/ T • . . ,,,,,i, E). ! , ,.. , ,+ r'•1 , I : _ .. .... • .... — ..j....._..I 1— I I : 7* :4 I ..I": craw 17 I • 1 li I I 7 1 -9313• 6)..:i o moulio,p .... , i I . . I 0 9313 ON) '991 YI PO• a • I , .... --1 x z T7g . f....'.Tt *95 ° : 1 . t 1 _4 : 1°P 1 '21 , 0 ; I " L ! '- ..., __4_____f..._ .. :i.' : . 0 rn 4, I r, ' '.---- I . . ra 73 , i ■ I . 1- • 4. a--; I-r—, I -I , -- 1° :7-ilF, r7;•--1 • 4_2_7- . CR x i I -4 ! I I .. __ i RI I c I I '-_______ 1 , . •--- 1 1 c7. ! II i I I ---E-i - I I i I I 1 I I I ---1--- 1 I : t ' roi-i Il =I- I- -I -- - - !. i • )r----- - -- . I 1 1 , .---1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I ..1 _.i I I . . I II I I HI 1 1 I- . . 1 _I , 1 , i 1 I i 4 t,-.. :2, e4 -id Itt ?.... PRELIMINARY, INCOMPLETE DRAWN=-NOT;ILLY APPRowzo BY GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS X TEi E - t SEC COVER SHEET FOR APPLICABLE NOTES ANC INSTRUCTIONS. BRIDGEPORT ROAD / DWG: NU, RKVINION DATE 111"APP Li e LOWER BOONES FERRY ROAD --v.- —, —tcurt-111. 9 UPPER BOOMS FERRY fib,TO O.W.8999 AYE. Cb LI 'IIMP !AZrI 4',WAHGTON Cowry C SIED•%A Ireil IFC DRAINAC J RE. .. PROFILE ... ...- ....... SHEET " "rOA C r an :P I'I r ow l, •-• ".' . .. '.. STA. BP 50+50 TO STA. _ -..-- r hei rgL i,,,,,, 7121A1:1 7 „ 4 I' Um RClC0001 RCIC0001 dw Sheets RC01-D n1 dwg Apr 16, 2004 - 10'55am Edr P41 PROJECT NUMBER, DRAINAGE DETAILS 75 G PRELIMINARY NARY C \T i�. a ar. 200 a. Mar. 2004 C4 APR 1 9 2004 er co co BY: _j ��---. Min. Top Slob Elev. 176.50' ■ — /�� o 4 PO 4 12” Low Flow Outlet Pipe I / v_. 12" Pipe From S y h (To Water Quality Swale) P / / z ,, c c • 1 I.E. 174.00' Travelers Lane o` E 30" PVC Riser ASTM F679 I.E. 176.00' L,o > 's Top Elev 174.20' I / w Q�, `Q. 1 2 Pipe Supports: 3" x 0.090 Gage Q a v m Support Bracket Anchored To o N o o v Concrete Wall (Max. Vertical - Channelized Base ci o o t, r_ Step Spacing 3) Fasten With _,^Q Q h 1/4" Dia. x 3" Wedge Anchor Bolts / z � `1/ II ala of 12" 1.5' ;o, il Removable Watertight Cop `=� Nom. I h � f 24" PVC ASTM F679 �� dL e 4 Flow— 6 Or Approved Equal) . _ _ _ ��_ U a - - j N 1.E. 164.39' ` 2.00' — 0 0 _ z 1_ + Pipe Supports: 3" x 0.090 Gage 18" Storm Sewer Support Bracket Anchored To I.E. 174.00' - — — 30" Storm Sewer 0 v)CC \ � y LE. 174.00' 0 z , 24" Concrete Wall (Max. Vertical ti ,. Large Precast Concrete Min Spacing 3) Fosters With Co o Manhole (72" Dia.) I 6" Concrete Control Weir Q 1/4" Dia. x 3" Wedge Anchor Bolts (See CWS Drg. No. 650) �- J Elev. 174.62' - Restrictor Plate With Large Precast Concrete I I a 0 Orifice (7.53" Dia.) Manhole (84" Dia.) a z (See CWS Drg. No. 650) I I 36" Nigh Flow Outlet Pipe .< J (To Detention) Q • FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE I I.E. 174.00' v Scale: NTS _, r /y 2 a_ yId- O w 0 2 ce vr W > o < L-- = to 0 Q c DIVERSION MANHOLE Qa o w °C ° CO Scale: NTS • (D 2 G i Q 2 vc Q O W I-G 1 Di LL V o -- H1 re W ce a0 ° i 4 \; a WOaai Z '�c� 0 m W 3 Q � �- Fs9�o mW2 G ce /Q:6 11.626 '•s;f,'�. m i�J 0oe tYRE W OREGON J a. a. - _ SHEET NO. ..F'S 2B J I 9 T:\Dm\RCIC0001\RCIC0001\dwq\Sheets\RC01-D' mg Apr 16, 2004 - 10.50am Edr PROJECT NUMBER` • SWALE GEOMETRY TABLE Const, 2421_ x 10'W x 10 H Precast 75% PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY SWALE DETAILS RCB (ASTM C-1433(Table 2: DESIGN 0 DESCRIPTION N E Mar. 2004 a. lnftention Live Load Design)) `° d BEG. SWALE 637753.76 7625198.99 , Detention Facility >• W x x A I � �`{',�'`•�-` i Inst. 36" Sew. Pipe - 35' °o ct B q FOREBA Y 637754.27 7625200.92 APR 1 9 04 W - N �� (For Details, See Shf, 2B-3) a �, o ���cs,N — C PC 637746.41 7625171.18 I 2004 %?% Sta. "72" 77+00.50 (22.2' Lt) �' ~"1 Diversion Manhole BY;_ _ Coordinate Final Rim Elev. With D PT 637699.92 7625166.30 -` Washington County Project #2550: E Lower Boones Ferry Rood From Boones y END SWALE 637681.50 7625202,76 Ferry Road To Bridgeport Rood . c c F (For Details, See Shts. 2B and 7) o o_ 'y y t- RADIUS PT 637722.24 7625177.57 W"- > a. a Connect To Existing Manhole c Q= CC �,,...' ,'� /l,;.; , 0=25,00' I v Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 103' a 0 �t� x " / Ton = 65.80' V fo cn o o / c car / 13873'32+ k 'r-z—� L, Sta. "72" 77+00.67 (9.T Lt) ^ Q o N / i .1` h ! ( 2D ) . . . „ , 71g< + - oordinategFinal eRim Elev.c With itn Manhole r z 4 7 'o Washington County Project #2550: r 1 From Boones Fe Ferry'' ': \'•. Lower Boones Ferry Road rr Iwoo /� 178'> eo r�•. / ? Road To Bridgeport Rood o � /—1 / r 9 Bj / ~\\ '�•. (`L�< 17r17 / t��Pa, �i r e = Inst. 36" Sew. Pipe - 13' �cr� I i5 (t 2 6" See CWS Dr No, 650 m Dry �� / 7 'N'�.) ... - - �O 0 74---..;„....- L •1 -A �`;� 'J L� •� - /1 _ ;y _.—� O i Sto. "72" 77+02.31 (71.T L t) p 3 W= Q•1--- ' �6 � "C *" - f•._ _ - Cons t, Swale Fore.bay fi a I oo"...-.. ?` O \‘'._,,zt/______-(1,i)` `J �-�` �4-� ` lust. 12" Sew. Pipe - 48" U Ffi O ^ c-^, _ Co.' ' R/W -._-------'"- C� . (For Details, See Sht, 28-4) �, / 1 B ') ,� _t Const. Water Quality Swale m z ,y •,_,-) (For Profile And Details, See Shts, to o \_. / _ ,-•i- See Sheet 28-3 2B-3 & 28-4) 2 ~ / , • ---/ 72 LINE For Detention Facility 24"-12' --- �:: .. r4-; Section -------- `" S t' & Profiles T Sta "72" 79+89 27 (9 9' Lt) • �' - - i Structure ( 2 Dr ) U'Co z - _ _ T ' Orrifice Diameter 17,53 tr , 7 a. Limits Ofd ____.--,-----------7- - i� Riser Elev, 174,20' m z Grading ® - ___ _ -- _ — \ Inst. 24" Sew. Pipe - 12' Q —— — (For Details, See Sht, 28) cn{�12"DI - 13'I /� i 36=- 13�!——,-.——— _ _ — - i Sta. "72" 76+29.57 (68.9' Lt) Q zz - .1 - re'v1 - fog; —�., 1 "-r • rr Inst. 14.36" Orifice on Outlet Pipe m 1 • Q _el.. — — - _1. 6 3 - (See CWS Drg, No. 250) '' v • J I , _ — I 1 .�, v - L\_)4�JL L +j`_;._-� ----� --,— (9 i Sta. I--"72" 76+2308 (45.6' Lt) Z Q • --- 1 V,- 31 ; -__— .� r Const. Inside Drop �! I 1 — - �, __TAY y;,' . .A,✓�` ✓F �; Inst. t12" Sew. Pipe 2 o f (fir CD -- / _-- _ _ . --- ' ! Sta, "72" 80+02 107,6 Rt. --,---- -- F.I._ d ( ) Q S • :.,.......,j________14____7:7:::______.1 sr - - ` ` _ - Const. Large Precast Conc. Manhole (72" Dio.)� o rr t i Rim El ev 179 4 p o w �' . �` Inst 24" Sew Pipe 118' Q W W o Q < W i I ! �__ i L C_`,_- .∎ `, (See CWS Drg. No, 650) o Q ---1 c� °` Q • % Iw CC co I r ,a 13 For Details, See Sht, 7 y.. Q p I . CC'� as t r" 11 '!s ,a '1 F S W 01/100 r/1 cn t?? . -'. ,-;•- — . iA �� (t?1 or Travelers Lone Roadway I- (t%) ' (3) ---- ICP,P1 N ' -• rf1 v and Fence Construction tW., OC �' r, ., l i__ Cr ,1 r --+-� .. `.a.; l�:1 r �{. ` Plan, See Sheet 13. (JrW 2 t-N ¢= Q r , 0 i • ; : ` _ -- - - a' Storm Improvements by Others . .. ,. _� o a Ca 1, ' . ��' Remove Inlet Shown Thus. �( _m w W • , ' Abandon Pipe Shown Thus � = C'3 - �PAq� z `: _ (4,7 clNg�s`' _ , �.� •. ... 6`■13,626 m \ oleecoN J a \��T °^4r = 0.-' 1 fq G.9P SHEET NO ! f EXPIRES 12.31-05 I 2B-2 . I I •1 • PROJECT NUMRER1 WATER QUALITY SWALE AND DETENTION PROFILES 75% PRELIMINARY DESIGN Mar. 2004 W 3c :z] O p 0 f 36" - 13' N O N • f n CL Existing Grade Line 180 ---- - of Pi.e _ 180 ' I/II 36 -35 I ' ---175 - ' ; , A 1 9 2004 �, '��� ! ' — 175 z _, o o •E 170 m c�o- o� - i en i•n F• ili ' ` 1 170 -6-,..„, �, >. a Fri H m ° See Details This Sht. 4 ' S'CO cn 24" - 12' �, I - '�' i E o 165 4 o s O „ _ " - - • I, -2.00% 165 -� o o u_• .. . ti (Cb o _ � O+ -0. I -� —�.. I H ,o En o o 'a o V 5' V ° •cO ' ? n1 r 1 cD V ` + G1 _ (/7 4.__''6. --�.�I Li K O O Z 160 o-�o co o N -0 I N i'1 0 0 !'*1 M 3,q— - rT1+ I {n o O` co 2r*tioF rnrn .•.. _ _ _ cuo !T, xO1 � 160 0ca 155 o 0-o � a `° f. + m c oo 01 � 7 d ° s co o Wc., < c '&C) 155 , 150 NI c-,�-'~ z� cn o ° n ''IL I 150 ���o`o I > : 'i Oat N Ot o v- -- u all I I - aa3aaNNOW I 22 4+00 3+50 3+00 2+50 2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00 3 p xW=aQ U cn ZE cn z (9 O • Z F- 2 o Et D Existing Ground Line @ p N 12"-24' -_ o z of Swale/Pipe 180 +0.44% 180 > o Proposed 18" Storm Profile Grade Sewer ® -� p a • 175 t water Qualit Swal I 12" - 4©_� 175 �' �, !Protect Extg. 10" Gas 130 I -0.44% - Steps o 170 - p:--- -4 50% . 170 Manhole Cone and Riser ,o (See CWS Drg. No. 100) a z 1Line in 16" Casing !�1 -•ti + `® a �, (See CWS Drg. No. 010) (� 165 Ii cN c., • c 165+0.44% J N r- 5'a v>co 160 i _ tea' -, a Cr-Q 160 ti iI 0.° Protect Extg. 36" 3 c°„ rn N A rn F C a ' 1551', _, g' - - •° ' - c' 155 I o IN a o Water ransmission cne rn N r� - ; o 0 Liu, g Invert Elevation 168.8+ �^' • Protect Extg. 36" I.o (n 150 "1 a cb (Field Verify Location And o( Z Wnter Trnnsmissinn I ina p a o 150 0 I.0 2 ~ Elevation) '�"�v Invert Elevation 168.8+ (Field N o w •._..o . °p Verify Location And `D rrI o i • U PROJECT Nl MREK WATER QUALITY SWALE DETAILS 18" Min. 75% DESIGNNARY -� Overlap Mar. 2004 F i Direction Of Flo: r _ W 1 9 Jn4 Upstream Fabric Layer Downstream Fabric Layer ,� -3—) 1 a/ U Laps Over Top ' FLaps Underneath l ? ° • Stake Through Stake Through _� � \' Both Fabric Layers Both Fabric Layers Water SECTION A-A Quality Swale Upstream Fabric Overlap$ Downstream Fabric �jl i- 400 g Coir Fabric and Stakes By 18" Min. o o •- / /\/ \\`• / — -- Top of Coir Fabric • !d �u •° 0. \/\�\y�" �j\\j/ �- 0 a 0 0 0 0 }Anchor Trench (Typ.) w Q 0 \/\// ! 6" to soil —/// -___- Stoke Through ¢ �o L. 3" I — \\/�\/\//\\j/�� Both Fabric Layers 4 cn ti _ ` /N/ Upstream Stokes Through y 2.5:1 Slope ��� • r,� 12" Existing Ground Fabric I Both Fabric La rs o -� ye x.r� Si. 2.5:1 Slope 0 z - //�//, r 3' (Typ) Downstream 4:1 Slope Direction Of Flow Fabric o of o� Water Quality I 4:1 Slope a ..Z C2' Swale River Run 6' J A A I Rock 1 L ° 0 (3 : 3 U '',2 `Z"' -.:c Profile Grade o I o c..) Note: See Sht. XX For Swale Plantings 0 0 0 0 D a 0 0 n U WATER QUALITY SWALE DETAIL N NTS vi z B COIR FABRIC DETAIL z O.D. + 2.0 FT. tt NTS 1 0 i O.D. Outlet Pipe O Z (Diameter Per Planj Trench Back fill (Typ. 400 g Coir Fabric o ODOT Class I 6" Min. m a 50 Riprap Varies ,�, 4mi% �� �3" Min. O ODOT 1 �7j1i ..�1=,.rteI ¢ z a 4 Riprap :I J 3'-D" A ® A Geotextile 6" Min" • ■ I 1 (ODOT Forebay _ m 4. 1,-0": , 7. 02320) Stake p a Match Existin 2 a 1.-0"' Slope I 0 0 Limits of Riprap Begin Water ;�,I Quality Swale ANCHOR TRENCH 2 W Blend Side B Begin Water 1 I w Slope To Quality Swale ---L NTS `� c=n Match Swale Profile Grade ivl 0.50% 0 cc Slope PLAN Outlet Pi.e 11 4., j Q P �T". 0 . SL" 4i Q W -'. ICI .°It1 1 1 .._ -_ --.-. I✓ \ �— _I Q o w m N Q Outlet Pie 4' Min. TT 1—:. z v 0} 3 F J ?� P Match Existing Grade ODOT Type 1 ti,c� CC q= Q N 12 " Min 15- al SECTION B-B Riprap Geotextile l I 2 Q cc=W p c W 0 I- } iv. 2 . • v cs, ` ` i `I✓ ` I P: W O Z °C VODOT Type `r, ;4' • 0 Z 0. d - 0, P P Geotextile II I'I pR G z W CC SECTION A-As oc o Rip Saw Finished .5 GINg W p p H Diagonally Stakes 4�`-i3.026t• m 113 Q SWALE FOR ''� ° W a. NTS STAKE FABRICATION '4a`� J ' SHEET NO. NTS EXPIRES ,2-�,-os 2B-4 J - • \ -,.i \i":"\--,- • 0 0o io N o I - __.ryrL m 1 • i31.1. 11 . -I-- ______L__.. „ ________[.._ ______._ ..__i o NJ X-- — — r = ; --- I ._ . INNING Old PR JECT I —I srA. "BP" 18+45 I i �—z. co [___ _ e �� I I Z1 ko k I 1 I G I -M 1 . .,AQ I I / Of 81+6t"d." - •o w i -` ^. I t o0 i :rt 17 I ■I I • N I� t C 4 06*61„c18. a O ro*I I i 0 1 . I I I I I N I R.NO m g . , I '.m , z m %aGo: - /1-Ad P1V 491 I sniPV , a .? 6L' - ! ; (3);SZ'Z6t X31 _ ' _ N 00 0E+1Z d8 lsnrp y 146121 P43 I ` 00'561 40/1.1/^ 13 501+• o f ; i I O, ' i R1 7 97 XS't i : .--_____--.._.__._-- 1 j.-- 1(3) 0'6 t 3 Y iv }snrPb 497 Pu 8t 5'61 �a 3 DOl - — + I -09'96+Zza ,--- �._.. .3a)�! SRf i I I �— - 1 I I r---, tv i I i I ' l i_i_ 0+ .---1— r • , ...,. : 1 1 a r'l 0 c,i }... . n "' II > ,--T_.0 0 I AD co + r-- N. O i —r.. ... i V r. �~ I I I ! ' ! ' hI I ga I � ' I I I a ! .`7S _ .......--.1 .._�..._. --- -Sro 00 0 0 p O 1. MATCH LINE o >EE SFir I 1 ,;; ti 2 O v N AO t.FQ/B ;pv H 4.0_it �y y m c� a a N_r W r z\oa" PRELIMINARY, INCOMPLETE DRAWINGS - NOT FULLY APPROVED BY GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS A z- l'< 0) SEE COVER SHEET FOR APPLICABLE NOTES AND INSTRUCTIONS. < BRIDGEPORT ROAD / DWG: NO. REVISION [DATE t1Y' APP. �; LOWER BOONES FERRY ROAD — B�:_,.DA.if-.._ Addendum 11-Drainage 4/ro/O'EDR = UPPER BOONES FERRY RD. TO S.W. 63RD AVE. DRAWN _-Tilt' 9/03 IFC "DRAINAGE ONLY" 3/04REA G1 T, WASHINGTON COUNTY ni DESIGNED JWS_9/03-_ 75% Submittal 3/04 CO o I RIGHT STORM LINE PROFILE SHEET C CKED . -. ._—__ Drainage Revisions 12/03 AIKL _ STA. "BP" 15+85.71 TO STA. "BP" 26+50 "--- Drainage Revisions 12/03 AK EA EPC --" --"-/0\_Issued-Issued For Permits 11/03 SEE SHEE. 136 -- . MATCH LINE ti 0 0 0 0 o o (M) £'''L 8l '3'1 } 01-961 a13 301 t.... H -a t I a N I ® rn cD .) CO '----- '--- i ce i," ,o t u I s 1 L :H. : v. •_.____ _ __.,, ; i D›. il: . ! 1 2 (3) 10 -91 37 + - -- --_�_ M -10 -81 .31 =— - o° ! l'S6l 13 001 __..__ I ! 7•lul 00+ . ' ,.. , N) - U I i ,._...,.. ... . -- r- i CD • • ; w DI a i i I , , •. , . 0 1(N i (3 10T91!'37 laluI S+ N I j i� 1 o r- - - - _ _ • p /Y o. �: i w °o i i i '� '11 + I � . #QBaS _. _. t .... . o i GA PuzL: ASS I i r w ...__._j Jadrrs llni 0 m jo4f �9L+ i ■ j • I I ax I a' o rn vl ' i m 3 (3) S 'OL 1 37, N. i 1 ! E I I (M) S 'OLl '3;11 •; o 1 , ti y .' � � slid 00;' 4 •• 4 1 ' ' 0 o• (3) £6L91 31 / vl P 1 rn . ,� (N) £'6'L91 I'3I . ro I ! h SL'Z�l '^al3 Ol: / i 1 I j JadnS pn T alul �0f/ ` MATCH LINE 1-„fit _!-IE::-T i (/ o- Lo a C. cb I- .1 --r,-+ z 0 a? z� a y oa ao 0 v ( N p op iv y . D corn P l \ ''z a O 0; m'Tii,z\�as, PRELIMINARY, INCOMPLETE DRAWINGS - NOT FULLY APPROVED BY GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS A zz f4 ,I �� SEE COVER SHEET FOR APPLICABLE NOTES AND INSTRUCTIONS. -< BRIDGEPORT ROAD / DWG: NO. REVISION DATE BY APP. LOWER BOONES FERRY ROAD r—T -�--- — N Br DATE T A UPPER BOONES FERRY RD. TO S.W. 63RD AVE. - +/r>a/o+ A WASHINGTON RD. COUNTY DRAWN JWS 9/03 /\Addendum #1-Drainave EDR CO _ Fm. DESIGNED JWS 9/03 IFC DRAINAGE ONLY° 3/04REA P RIGHT STORM LINE PROFILE SHEET CHECKED _.--_. 75% Submittal 3/04 STA. "BP" 26+50 TO STA. "BP" 36+50 - 1 Drainage Revisions 12/03 A1KL EA - • j0�Issued For Permits 11/03 c .75% PRELIMINARY PROJECT Nt MEER'S% . PLAN SHEET 0 , DESIGN Mar. 2004 .4,:. --- See Sheet See Sheet -cc-cc 11 go i© c) 0 0 00 © 00 el r "-,,,.. ,, .., y.. 4r) el al NI- st-n t.) // .• .24.--- - _- - ' ., /7 -- CC = ••••t--) r--) - --- t1.)151§-1-.1 a o3.---- n '"`(-----"?' 4/./ : z _ . // . /..... .,... . , 0 A CD I - - .-._.___ - - ---_.. - _, . • 11 "CL Line ,L7 I I- _ _ CD 0 •0 0 ‘: i .. tcr 0 .1:1 10 0 ''.....-.'"Pz-: 11!Acpwc: :0 •• / :/ ... .,:t. . ,. / ‘ 1, / „, Lli I- Z i 1 \-4-- • 4( d/ .• "BP" 37+80.06 = ::-' Cc. i 19 -c. c_., i w 3t.- , , • 0 ' -. "DC' XX+XX.XX , Cc. 1 ± D 1 Temp. Ease Work Area U.) ,. • "AL" Line P.,1 Luz zj • ... • Y.` , . 0 ..7.- 1 I 0 (A 0 0 ta - sz .E. 0; ' 0 @ -ia 0 BP-42+99.64 = (liki: 0/1 1 '":'1 :li I I I . > . : - 0 ..■ 7,-- ■13 S. %) G3/ I . i + •63 j‘ .0 k c3 - 40 0 "AL" 187+64.95 6715Pth" 4128:2404 9399 = 1 • _X -o.0 Lc) ■._ 0 4.: N cl co , . 12"-42' __;__ (4:271 • • • . /2-_.30 It) 0 _ s, - ,..., CD \ to C3 e_ ,%,„,...t _, .,..:. ' ,..-, , • ___-_-_Ta --- . - - - - - - . '-.. 1 . . AO 0 0 ii " ..- .... 15 ,'.1-. Of .....k...- '''' ...... . I' , . + '- i,.■ 0 12"-82' ' 12-- '.' , 04tift , lb ■40:4 sok', le ,, ----2 4. `1)4_ 77, -- I....-- s -,---: ,..:7,. ,..._:: _.. ,...,.. • , ...ec,t i n 1/4- 1-'04.-2' latitt' 'IL ARIONamteminammileMICRIRI V •JIIIIPM■11=11111111111/ kirnalla . •i''''r:" .''''' '. CD t-,_ __ _ 757 - ,talglw ' 1 1 ,_ . 10 r 4 18 'r8 15 ---15 _ 1 io - --- • ■.... w- LI o , Lo 79' 7.Q. 123' 951 0 -• * U-1 io 0-) -. Sawcut Line ...._.........-- ,... ,--,-, z ei- ,...-4.p7.7i....:.:::. •/ L 0 so_ ,00 ,:' o 0 / 0 5LOWER BOONES FERRY ROAD 1 i 0 c.. 0 ___ . • c, - - I N88" 420 - - -- • • 0 c--) : 15, 90', 12 -52 711‘ i . 1 1,cirl-rAdire f.:.x.) 4 \ 3I-W- 1 1 - 13 112"-1.3' 1 c-, sow=t Line e c)0 I = .-.*•.- - - ,,...„ _ - _ _ _ .....4)._. _ , , _ c• 0 -.1-- 0/1 '. ' _--' -Grading L it z vi - _ _ _ - - -- - ---... --- c. 7 _ 11. " -T.'74i ..---- --' --"- - - - - - L. f .."' (Fig) _.. -... ..., , , , ---.. ' 'D)).0-..; ' IL 0 0 CD 0 ^ t.- it 4-t''"I"'4"-'4N -"- e irri,„ , .,,- , ge . 44 0. © , . - - - z 0 lip ,„,,,- , IY n I BPI' 4,3+24.97 = .... [...vs.; TenfO. Ease.-Work Area ._ - ' "BL 186+85.91 - ----•\--- Limit -• ' d'i ,15 0 (/) . / ' p 11V I /-------- - R/W ,, (Fill) -- - 0 . I . • ./'-'- Z 0 Z N /0._ 0 , I BP LINE - , , 0 (-) - . I eL 1 i ,/,$,, / , 3 : ' . 0 c' - - V ti ° Ni I- 2 1 •k. ,/.- Ct ■ Ca < -- rz D e 0 sr./ r I ' „, /1 I , , •cr /, Q' cc X.4 ' 1 : . 0 w , / . <4 ' eV 1,0 Z e , 0 i R- L . , a 0 ! 0 , -2_ o , . . , ,, a. . / , •L, L 1 J 0 0 o 00 0 (D0610 el (E) 0 See Sheet 10 0 10 0@ ■.1-4 Cri< 2 See Sheet "DL" Line "BL'' L i n e C) Sta. "BP" '391f-53 (53.6' Rt.) 0 Remove Extg. 12" 0 Sto. "BP" 39+78 (53.6' Rt,) '- - _1 12 ' " Const. Type V-2 7 Inlet Storm Pipe - 370 Const. Type "G-2 Inlet 0 eL 0 Sta. "BP" 39+88 (53.6 Lt.) 0 Sta. "BP" 46+00 (65.5' Lt.) @ Sta. "BP" 49+12.80 (68.1 Lt.) Const. Precast Basin, 18 Deep 2 < ROADWAY NOTES Const. Type "G-2" Inlet Const. Tyr).e "G-2" Inlet Inst. 12" Sew. Pi 'pe. 25' (See Ore on Std Dr RD.364 Const. Manhole with Inlet (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364)) I gg. Ntz 0 Const. Sidewalk Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 30' Inst. 15" Sew. Pipe - 12.3' . ) Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 253 cri I,- (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD720) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD.364) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) (-- Sta. "BP" 41+00 (53.6' Rt.)\„ (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD348) 0 2 I- Const. Type Adjust Manhole Shown Thus: WI © Sta. "BP" 41+00 (56.3' Lt.) 0 Sta. "BP" 47+25 (55.0' Lt.) Sta. "BP" 48+22.50 (64.1' Lt.) Abandon Pipe Shown Thus := 0 Const. Standard Curb E=7" Const. Precast Basin, 18" Deep Const. Type "CG-3" Inlet Const. Type "G-2" Inlet st. Manhole with Inlet Remove Inlet Shown Thus: X (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD700) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) Ct ILi 0 Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 80' Inst. 15" Sew. Pipe - 95' Inst.'4,5" Sew. Pipe - 87' Remove Tree Shown Thus: 0 0 Const. Conc. Island, Type A (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD.372) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) 0 Reconnect Storm Drain (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD348) Fill 14 0 -.I 0- (-) < o Pr 2 (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD705) .:•y('-'- Sta. "BP" 41+00 (41.5 Rt.) 0 Sta. "BP" 37+00 (69.3' Rt.) 0 Sta. "BP" 43+70 (60.2' Lt.) g Sta. "BP" 43+ . (54.4' Rt.) Cut 0 uj 6_ Const. Standard Storm Sewer Manhole Const. Type "G-2" Inlet 0 Const. Sidewalk Ramp Inst. 15 Sew. Pipe - 90 Const. Manhole with Inlet Const. Type "G-2 • et 0 cn >- § a. co Over Extg. 21 Storm Pipe Inst. 18" Sew. Pipe - 70' Const. Pre-Cast Basin, 8" Deep GENERAL NOTES: o CC pi I- I- - .< cc z n U.I •ei (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD760) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0364) Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 12' (See Oregon Std. D No. RD,348) (See Oregon Std. D No. -#364) Rim D. 167.82 rg. o. ee regon rg. o. All Storm Pipes to be Class V RCP Z cc u. ' (-) T col- 0 Const. Conc. Island, Type A CD ajar Adjust Manhole A 0 Sta. "BP" 45+20 (67.0' Lt.) 0 Sta. "BP" 43+50 (38.0' Rt.) Unless Otherwise Identified. 2 ci z I.E. 163.40 (S) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0705) .. -. • .. •n oe -- I.E. 161.38± (14) Extg. Const. Type "G-2" Inlet Const. Standard Storm Sewer Manh• - CC w a_ Inst. 15" Sew. Pipe - 13' OZerzZ 0 (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD336) Inst. 15 Sew. Pipe - 79 Over Extg. 12" Storm Pipe For Curb "-turn Data Tables,See Shts. 5B & 6 ct CI. 0 E E < co STORM SEWER NOTES Inst. 12 Sew. Pipe - 67' (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 16' A " SHEET STAMPED AND SIGNED cl- U-1 0 LL (I) -J + Sta. "BP" 39+46 (53.6 Le) qi) Sta. "BP" 44+40 (67.6' Lt.) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD360) ,--, Rim Elev. 170.74 /4\FOR P.'WAGE- ONLY" Q7) Sta. "BP" 42+50 (56.4' Lt.) 0 W Const. Type "0-2" Inlet Const. Type "C-2" Inlet 0 Sta. "BP" 39+01 (53.6' Rt.) I.E. 166.43 (5) 49,11114% - cc z Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 42' Inst. 18" Sew. Pipe - 79' Const. Type "0-2" Inlet Const. Type ''CG-3" Inlet I.E. 166.18± (W) Extg. a -,...4%G 1 N e e.te% CC „, 0 cri o EL 03 Connect to Extg. 15" (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 52' (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD372) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) 0 Minor Adjust. Manhole (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364),.--, Q8j) Sta. "BP" 41+80 (56.3' Lt.) 0 Sta. "BP" 40+18 (53.6' Lt.) iat 4'4 - .1•0 --j a oci (See Oregon Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD360) 0 Connect to Extg. Manhole Const. Type "CG-3" Inlet Const. Type "C-2" Inlet Inst 12" 1 P.p,. ..k.... 14 10-Ck‘ = CO Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 13' Sew P - 70' Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 82 G.' SHEET NO. . . ipe I EXPIRES Q-31.05 1 I.E. 162.94 (S) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) 5 (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0372) ,..../ I.E. 159.90± W Ext.. MATCH LINE 36+50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . .1 0 . .. - _...-._T — _ _-_..——__... .._.—.._. __ _ , ._.1. I (N ' ) 09'9 I 37 • co ' I I •,., • v - ' S••OL! ^al(3.001 I N 1 4�" i - 1 r 0 o Ei L_ la/zil 6I3+ ��i�r,, a►,• v I i - . 72-. 'I` '64)(3- •1 1.'• 137 -..--4-, Fl 2.13 ,t 3S) 00'9'9 w �' .. ________ -,!.j z 3I o ti r ,y► uollo s W 4' 9E'69, n613 W!M ro I y.o SL 991 1 ., cN �alo�;uo aull N IJ I ' X3 6f*4+ v, a".N ODV6 8f' 1 5.co �ul6a8 0 +8£ ,d iTt - - -1.. .. ..';7 %SZ'0- ° `:go• , uol;oas P IO4UOO u goes pe o }uo3 u!- 1 -I1 o+8f'1 ° _ ---I - O 1 oo 1 1 j I 1 1 1 15-L9l A047 001 : ! I ' " ,' c U 06'x:l - cn ao I : ■10+ I o 41) £'Z'f 9t 37"II. I -I o en i i I ( 691'91 '37 r II I p LO'9t i ; 1 • �' (�) f Z'£9! 3'1 i I GS - OZ F i a-, L�l �a13 Ol 1 I + f i. f f L9L 'na13 dot 9^ o I I i #a/u/ b+ 1I ---- - o r -( + ' - : o uj ; o N I ! (3) 9L'C9l 3'I (�) �a9j1 .3.1 I o :Z7 I r-1:45•2 m r.1 o r+l 1 I ! Sb'L ! ^al3 Ol r ii off jL9! 1 :001 • G� _ o ,� I-.. i 1 lalul 9+ li + m , + I • -l alur! 8L+----I--- 1-- — _...._ p 1:14:1 , -- it Off? 2-r..1- w 3 13 1 (3 16'£91 37 y II � G� -Ii C - N,'• a ! i 6S'L l Aa13 01 +^a - C N N)--1:1 ►1 oN --I �! m I o 1 {_loe 1 ' m 1 Z'bs! 3'1 b 11 I ° N 0 f 91.... \ o I..._.__- ; . .. • -1 ( (Al)(3) LZ'b91. '37_. t_._. cam_ - I m I M O O S' '37 ; - o i i Of 891 ^a!3 Ol 11 S r S '991 Y413 001 I `• 1;11 Z I I i ! }al ul + +° I z e/j1 00+ i 1 :�� fTl I Q ' rnL 11 I'*1 -.._.. •o - -- ... III-_4..-- _- - �- . Qo M 3 () 9L'*91 '3'I o a I • ! 1 a• I I i `I () 914,9 '3'1 ` F,061. o r... -1 1' o j I i 1 r }aut,pg+ . `{.0 - o}1 -- i 1 m o li m n, � i� ! (M) 91'9'91 '3'1 , 0 III " � ! .._ o +Zb - -; - -- 8691 .A9/ .� ; '-__a. __. . PO I 09+ � �a 0, - _ i i I �` z 1 10 — Im i c.r `o I X 3 i_ � I I . m o . 1 i yvf Ills t—.-_J I j I� I_-.._.i T) r i � I oaol :I ! � i (N) 0�'99l 31 ! � :. I 1 � i I � as 60'LLl ' !3 00 - o k l 6 'I4 S . . . 391u1-094--- ..... I --. _....------ -. , ---.. - . -- - •60 .zz X91—g'1 - I l ,i 6, - - 1_•\ -- --- — ; i (1:1 cn (3) LZ•b91 37 �1 r' 9'9 Of b 171 . . h ij0 tab : 3 1 - Isla"j._±+ i i - + _._.. _.I i I ! (� 9S't9 '3'I rev. ■ (I) I I ' 1� (3) 9S'b9 p '3'! I� �. .. .1 .- �. _ _ 1 __ DL'ILl_X1001 + o i 1. i_- la1W Ofr+ !, 1 rlr*1 m � a• x i l O 'a ' , rt -. I 11 N I I ' i '`° I I I I I (d iI 1° `° m co ay! I_.. ..§.. ; ----- (P) L8'b51! '31 1D ...\I is o _I ° `. I II ( I 1 1 0 Sb'1L I •Aaq 001 r�h• .. 9I'bLI 1 i #alu OZ+ \ - cn Iloa --` - Q>3+9'b — - -.. - —_.. . ._......_+ --. + . . . ._. __ (D T-- ;", 1 t- 1 tIl- I o I j I I I I I I ' it I {(M) ZS'9'91 37 i,1 I 1 11 I I S' �� -IL(� �p I ._...---. - - ' � - .-�ft ^413 001__ r _ �. . 1 i o I I I 1 �r-) - I ! 3- i la,JI 00+ •4. n/x r x I i 1 `� r I O T•o a i w• I j I + 1 "I IP •J � 4 H I -_ . ._.._ bbh k, I. j I o�0 3 00 0 . I 11 I a I I f 1- : ��N i a_ �r-cL-„% r- I i CN 113 O c,_ I X V ! I { r •o: o 111 . (M) £Z1991 3'1 _ 1 lin a + - - �_... - _ _ _ . -I e�l_- o 1 1 Fy "N-1 ! j I i+ti'ZL! '^ 13 u�121 I 6 i I i,u, 9'z+ 1 i •�j 1 I � i .1 1 I I ip, I 1 I co i — (M) S '991 .3.�� _ °` o f D I I ,LO'ZL L Aa13 001', ■ 1 i '4 1 I j \ ialW HW S'ZZ x r -. ---- i ' - . . A r I I �. A . UT r I - --- III I I 42° a o �9'ZLI o 1 1 I o -- a`-{ I p 100+617 L I -- - - - III I 89.1 -._ _(...,<16+817 o � R1 I i (3) 6 991 I ' n I I i( I i I ZL•ZL t I A0/3 0 1 I `I 1 I I a ti N ' �o; }a1W HW 9'ZL _ .- - -- - I � i (III ! I i I I 1 i 1 I -1:63 o O I ' s �h ! I ; I I — l o °o w MATCH LINE -is.'0+54 I MATCH DINE 0 5 T �RF !tt i SEE ;I+ F:7 riA 1' r 3 $ ,y +_ �S 21 - - I r �li, ti li , _ SEE `�H!_E1 et i- ' - mm fir 44'. .1%,"t„ O V a 01 v 00 Of V pp N N r c. P • 1 t ;2 O O O O O O O o o0E i 1s'`\;± ,� PRELIMINARY, INCOMPLETE DRAWINGS - NOT FULLY APPROVED BY GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS :2z. �, l u f� � SEE COVER SHEET FOR APPLICABLE NOTES AND INSTRUCTIONS. -c NO. REVISION DATE BY App. b BRIDGEPORT ROAD / DWG: o N LOWER BOONES FERRY ROAD - -BY DATE m UPPER BOONES FERRY RD. TO S.W. 63RD AVE. • DRAWN JWS JJP4 Addendum #I-Drain aye 4/19/WREA n al "'.': WASHINGTON COUNTY • DESIGNED. JWS. J/04 IFC "DRAINAGE ONLY 3/04REA D = PROFILE SHEET CHECKED-__.. . . - / 75% Submittal 3 04 a STA. "BP" 36+50 TO STA. "BP" 50+50 EA Issuedge Revisions ssued For Permits 11/03 - f PROJECT MAIREP\ '75% PRELIMINARY • PLAN SHEET DESIGN _ _ _ _ Mar. 2004 ;_, O © 0 0 O5 25 26 e� 28 @ 0 29 W \ CURB RETURN DATA TABLE a ,a- 0 0 ,s3 a6 T.O.C. �X a�0 6 0 CURB STATION OFFSET ELEV. RADIUS DELTA (� • Q 1,�' P.C. "72" 91+08.90 38.00' 182.11 �X �6 1/4 A "72" 91+24.51 40.31' 182.15 `;, h � . X s • _� AI 4 0 12" 122' �� Q v A 1/2A "72" 91+38.66 47.02' 182.04 40.00' 8239'07" c o E V co ^' " r y, •'=' - a�i "1/cv.■A♦ d� ti o0 3/4A 72" 91+49.87 57.49' 182.09 - -s Q P.T. "72" 91+56.69 70.62' 182.22 o�G NN�, • (/�. �® (n P.C. "72" 92+20.37 96.24' 181.87 Q o•�Q` �\ - .:sue' „\ ® 2" 12" - 121' '0' o_ Cm 1/4 L "72" 92+13.47 75.13' 181.92 v 6 �N %to ti) �� �5 p c Limits of Work B 1/2A "72'" 92+21.01 54.27 181.53 40.00' 12635'03" ,� O N h • 3/4� "72" 92+38.94 39.37' 181.18 "- `^ * ��= _ _ 'r 12" - 86' 1 " - 123' P.T. "72'" 92+62.11 34.00' 180.95 I,.'*.� 2"-68' ". � _,� -- Temp. Ease.-Work IQ°� � 0c■ `` - �Areo o I �► ``„\T nom/ -wrl -` 1/40 "72" 94+43.32 43.48" 18107 s .1 I �. • 1AJ e - - - - C 1/2 A "72" 94+48.24 35.68' 181.21 r 25.00' 85'00'58" �� ' y Saw r„' _ - _ _ - . ' . - Line 2 AVENUE 3/4A 72" 94+55.65 30.14' 181.07 N W�, S W 7 AVE r _ 7 s -. '. - - SO '3953 '' o I oo=wW P T "72" 94+64.34 27.77' 180.89 R/W ••-,-... - ( � G P C 72 93+85 96 33 69 182 34 72' A "72" 93+95.82 35.33' 182.09 71 Grading Limit (Fill) 1/4 J • R 420 00' C.R. Temp. -/ © �_J D 1/20 "72" 94+04.25 40.70' 181.58 25.00' 92'1323" z TG 3835'36" Ease.-Work 72" 93+03.99 P.T. RT. �'72 95+73.50 3/4A 94+09.90 48.94' 181.07 C7 0 j I T 147.05' Area CL CURB 7.60' RT 19.83 Rt. End Curb z v I P.T. 177221 72 94+11.88 58.73' 180.80 E 1/2 94+23.83 31.54' 181.67 1.00' 115 27'27" o n Temp. Const. Z Ease. F 1/2 A "72" 94+33.63 30.80' 181.51 1.00' 122 33'44" o G 1/2 A "72" 94+28.77 39.96' 181.60 1.00' 121'58'49" co 9 cn I. © @°° 35 J I© O O 4 1 © a O El. z For Additional Q j Tri-Met North SIDEWALK RAMP TABLE �. Park & Ride STORM SEWER NOTES: ca n • Improvements OFFSET TO L. 1' See Sheet 18 2© Sta. "72" 89+80 (38.3' Rt.) ©© Sta. "72" 0 STATION OF RAMP DESCRIPTION p a- 95+35.28 (21.6' Lt.) 2 < Const. Inlet Catch Basin (CG-48) w/o Const. Inlet Catch Basin (CG-48) w/o 1 "72" 91+31.37 42.97 LT Opt. A x ROADWAY NOTES: Sump p Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 29' Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 86' 2 "72" 91+49.42 56.99 LT Opt. A c 1-1.-(See CWS drg. No 240) l- 01 Const. Conc. Curb and Gutter (See CWS drg. No 240) 3 "72" 92+15.02 66.31 LT Opt. A w (See Wash. Co Drg. No. CS-300) 23 Sta. "72" 90+10 (38.3' Rt.) ©8 Sta. "72" 94+50 (33.8' Lt.) 4 "72" 92+22.80 52.06 LT Opt. A O N O2 Const. Standard Curb Const. Inlet Catch Basin (CG-48) w/o Const. Inlet Catch Basin (CG-48) w/o ix in E=7" Sump Sump 5 "72" 94+10.17 49.18' RT Opt. A W p Q a + (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. Inst. 12" DI Sew. Pipe - 122' Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 121' c 10 RD700) (See CWS drg. No 240) (See CWS drg. No 240) 6 "72" 94+42.00 48.51' RT Opt. A 0_ c-) 0 °f 11-1 CC 2 O3 Minor Adjust Manhole ©9 Sta. "72" 96+58 (25.9' Lt.) 2 v) p} 3 > ti 24 Sta. "72" 91+05 39.3' Lt.) Connect to Extg. Inlet z H (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0360) ( ce Const. Inlet Catch Basin (CG-48) g' >.- Q CC 0 W a Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 123' O W o o O4 Const. Concrete Island, Type A (See CWS drg. No 240) CC LL z W (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD705) Prior to Construction-Confirm WATER LINE NOTES: 2 o z = Extg. Pipe Invert at "72" 96+58, F-lA oc o N O 25 Sta. "72" 92+65 (35.3' Lt.) Confirm Elevation of Telephone at 35 Water Connection N.I.C. W p Z ¢ z Z I- OS Const. Sidewalk Ramp P Const. Inlet Catch Basin (CG-30) vault at "72" 95+28 (35' Lt. THIS SHEET STAMPED AND SIGNED (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0760) ( drg. 230) ( ) Adjust Manhole Shown Thus. . " a W p LL aii J �+ See CWS dr No 230 FOR DRAINAGE ONLY" O m a3 < a as O6 Inst. Monument Box 30 Possible Utility Conflicts Remove Inlet Shown Thus: p W 3 O0 Pothole Prior to Construction - 3 z (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0115) 26 Sta. "72" 93+25 (35.3' Lt.) 9PApeF o N Const. Inlet Catch Basin (CG-48) w/o Remove Inlet Shown Thus: d�`, #1. m 3 m ti Sump WATER LINE NOTES: Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 55' GENERAL NOTES: Fill °'olz oN •I . a wi (See CWS drg. No 240) All Storm Pipes to be Class V RCP Cut 47)•,,. e� Cr) 35 Water Connection N.LC. P <ree 0 Unless Otherwise Identified. Possible Utility Conflict Shown Thus: X SHEET NO ` y I ExvwES :-�,.os 8 J . MATCH LINE 89+50 —'`, 0 0 o N \ r \ N) 15'8 17 _ co o I t �gl 1 08 f �' i 61'£81 :nal3 DO o N a I a • /\17-7- R .--17: 0 o o - 9Z 8l ?nal bac 1 I I ! 45'57+16 „ZL„ glu, S0+ 6£ PuZL- 0• D N p -1 -g: Al—j:---. I I _ _� I i! 0 o o ; o (N OS'!�L 1 1 '! I k °y o �q 3 dt1 *6'0 l •A a I N I o ' N f g W ' I % ; I a I 1£'1Z+,6 „ZL„ (S) C'LLI Y c:, .-'•- --- .....•-- r Q. -•-- ° JZLLI '1 z' Z . £'9 09l 't a13 Dat 1�l -- - - �� -�-- ...49/ SZ+ I. — ! i I : I Gf•SL+£6 Z „ ! _N I -- _ - .A.4. o . N ;o I ' '(N) £L 9L l 3I I I --T 1 i I T!• __ I i I — _ ; Z I — I 1£ S9+46 „ZL„ Z'08l • 813 do_t, • o 0 •01+176 O L+b6 o • ° 1 } Wl OS+' ! N f . 6L'081 u, I . O '° (N) S£'9LIl 31 � 8°) ( ! �_..._.... TO I £9L1 3! I d ad is :5•14*x34 Dry - - Li ?±e3 dol • 1 • 1£'SS+g6 „ZL. I }eiul 8aS£+ O I I /. I + j i_ -o I o M I I I 6}x3 (N)I Ff•'OL 1 1.31 / -j G 1 o c,�._...- •I m z , : }alul Sill_}x3 68'7 + —:_ - 4 i I j i 1 + - - I -- _ l'SLl _ cn o �. 0 A"00+L 6 o • I I :� � I = I I ; ( � I I I 4 °1 ti I I j j ± il m I I I " I ! t I i ■ j ° ! i . I • I --- _. - I N. I / I 21 cn . i .I_ I_ N `Rc,� 0 c 0 0 °o i� a 0 0 V � a1 ', ` C a w % ' .' PRELIMINARY, INCOMPLETE DRAWINGS - NOT FULLY APPROVED BY GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS p Z z N q D; `1 SEE COVER SHEET FOR APPLICABLE NOTES AND INSTRUCTIONS. e < BRIDGEPORT ROAD / —T DWG: NO. REVISION DATE BY APP LOWER BOONES FERRY ROAD BY.._ DATE_.- 4 UPPER BOONES FERRY RD. TO S.W. 83RD AVE. r" OD 1 DRAWN JWS 9T y WASHINGTON COUNTY . DESIGNED_JWS 9/03 IFC Drainage Only" 4/W°'REA z D o PROFILE SHEET CHECKED—_._ . . . 75% Submittal 3/04 x STA. "72" 89+50 TO STA. "72" 97+00 � EA Profile Revisions 12/03 JWS co , --- ---- Issued For Permits 11/03 • !:\.r, 10.-X1 '!■_,:1 .1"q..7,ec,E CU1-1 rr; F_• �, 3.4 E:.. ■ . ( PROJECT •14ik3Ea 75% PRELIMINARY ---- PLAN SHEET „ „ Mar.2004 -.2,_.41 3p See Sheet I N APR 9 2004 '. 0 42 ® 43 ® O 4 el © m i W V. W For Additional \� % • ` w o 0 0 0 .` Travelers Lane ; !y ,e�� 72" \N N _ Improvements f 0 '9� ' ' P" 32+53.95- R 420.00' C.R. ra g Limit o BY' See Sheet 13 \ \` 85+41.41 0'A, TA 74'09'35" (Cut) • 1: Q �^ T317.41' o 40 ° ,' - -'--------R - ® Luminarie • - 8 j CO s� �, S.W. 72n ' VENUE �� 1III1;�i O - i •.. �x a> Grading Limi Ni R 420.00' C.R. �a �`: �I �/ .. � � �+ N (Cut) - , N Td 34'40'46 0' / i . / ` _ 21,_ •=•-.5...6,- v 7�� v T 131.13' / 4' 46' ., ,` o,c. ■ ■. - t // \\ VIN ' I- tt ,‘,i _ALA ),. 0\ N ( 12:Ate,?7,0'''' DR- ./ _IF--- I R W s. I/1 xx"1� + I -■�_ , �� � a ' ' 2��� Grading Limit 20 c o 2 W W p y2 Grading Limit --- 1 1« / '0 (Fill) U o 1�.1.. °' \ --- (Cut) - - 2 .�- 30 - 30� u 12' Sawcut N -.11\11), i �� _ ammommimminummimiminmaL0 ......_,_-Line sus• ,� '�r C9 0 0 ® m mo -_ /S004639'W S.W. LOW R BOO ES FE'RY ROAD D ,� - f " __Groding \ ��m _y� era.._. __. L _ - - _, -,r _ _ - 3 ► Limit ' p" .L Sheet�r 4r' -2 80' :--37$:,,,,..z,;,.;,:-,7-,;?. 'r.. - �� See For l 's•s,+ �,-� ' _ _ :,� 3� `•'' •p _ ( y� Island 0 z Fill) '( e M • E c`e A■ r %..•I `�� Geometry r 8 ;_, \ I ; o For Additional I z i ® Tri-Met&Bode ' < Limits of Work o Ri o w 26 36 @ ® 34 O4 O7 CM g © improvements See Sheet ct I- ROADWAY NOTES: ® ® See Sheet f7 5 a o ©9 Sta. "72" 79+23.32 (40.2' Rt.) 36 Sta. "72" 77+00.5 22.2' Lt. Q 2© Sta. "72" 88+00 (39.8' Rt.) O ( ) © w O Const. Conc. Curb and Gutter Const. Standard Manhole Const. Diversion Manhole 4 Sta. "72" 81+75.39 (38.3' Lt.) >- l Const. Curb Inlet Manhole (CG-48 M.H.) Rim. Elev 180.16 Const. Inlet Catch Basin (CG-48) �+ m `R.(See Wash. Co. Drg. No. CS-300) Coordinate Final Rim Elev. With Washington r a w/o Sump I.E. 175.00 S Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 93' v Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 95' ) County Project X2550: Lower Boones Ferry Road P � O2 Const. Standard Curb P I.E.iE 174.2± (E) Extg. Pipe From Boones Ferry Road to Bridgeport Road TOC Elev. 177.58 , a E=7" Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 5' (Cop) inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 80' I.E. 175.59 (N) o a (See CWS Drg. No 195) P Inst. 30" D.I.Dl Sew. Pipe - 302' ( ) z < (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0700) ( g ) Connect to Extg. Inst. 18" Sew. Pipe - 5', Slope = 0.189 I.E. 175.59 (S) I "i Remove Extg. inlet Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 75' (See CWS Drg. Na. 240) o 23 Sta. "72" 86+31.50 (29.8' Rt.) P to w 03 Const. Retaining Wall (See CWS Drg. No. R010) (See Sht. 2B Const. Curb Inlet Manhole (CG-48 M.H.) ( 2B) 43 Sta. "72" 82+75.00 (38.3' Lt.) ° (See Sht. W-x) 30 Sta. "72" 81+62.20 (38.3' Lt.) 37 Large Precast Concrete Manhole Z z w w/o Sump Const. Inlet Catch Basin (CG-48) 0 w 10 Const. Retaining Wall inst. 18" Sew. Pipe - 154' Const. inlet Catch Basin (CG-48) (See Sht. 2B-2) TOC Elev. 179.46 cn N Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 12' I.E. 176.00 o O (See Sht. W-x) (See CWS Drg. No 195) 38 Water Quality Swale a CI Sta. "72" 84+80 (54.2' Rt.) TOC El. 177.56 (See ) 2 < o See Shts. 2B-2, 2B-3, and 2B-4) (See CWS Drg. No. 240) Q +�+ w p � OS Inst. Monument Box I.E. 175.53 (N) ILI + Const. Standard Manhole ° ° Q o v1 (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD115) I.E. 175.53 (E) 39 Sta. "72" 80+02.56 (26.1' Lt.) a4 Sta. "72" 82+32.55 (81.92' Lt.) 4 0- 0 cc m Inst. 18" Sew. Pipe - 138' Const. Flat To Manhole Z2 w CE m 6 Relocate Light Pole Inst. 18" Sew. Pipe - 141' 3t Sta. "72" 240) Rt. Inst. 30" D.I. Sew. Pipe - 66' Const. Type "G-2" inlet -o o � } ' A O (See CWS Dr No 010 0 ( ) Const. Precast Basin, 18" Deep in W z p 3 1- (by others) ( g' ) Const. Inlet Catch Basin (CG-48) Inst. 12" D.I. Sew. Pipe - 12' TOC Elev. 177.89 ,_e Q cc to ©5 Sta. "72" 84+30 (53.9' Rt.) TOC El. 179.50 (See CWS Org. No. 050) I.E. 173.20 iEu 2 >: 0 woo w < 7 Const. Retaining Wall Const. Curb Inlet Manhole (CG-48 M.H. =Q CC IL ~ W (See Sht. W-x) ( M.H.) I.E. 175.75 (N) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364 in Z o = V�et( ) 40 Sta. "72" 77+35.28 (88.8' Lt.) ( 9 9 ) ° _ ( ) w/o Sump Pipe (See CWS Drg. No 240) Const. Type "G-2" Inlet 45 Connect to Exist. Manhole z W o N O Inst. 24' Sew. Pie - 46' 32 Sta. "72" 80+46.39 (24.0' Rt. o OS Const. Commercial Driveway (See CWS Drg. No 195) O ( ) Const. Precast Basin, 18" Deep Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - .37' . W 0 Z ¢ i Z C (See Wash m is No. DW-203 ( g' ) Const. Proprietary Water Quality Manhole TOC Elev. 182.30 ( g ) GENERAL NOTES: a a O w z Q I+ 26 Connect to Extg. Manhole Stormceptor Model 900 or CDS Model I.E. 177.93 (E) w 0 to < J r. Omw d STORM SEWER NOTES: (See Sht. 28-2) PMSU20_15 Contractor to Submit Shop (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) All Storm Pipes to be Class V RCP p w 3 27 Remove Extg. Culv. Pipe Drawings Prior to Installation Unless Otherwise Identified. = CC o N 21 Sta. "72" 89+05 (38.3' Rt.) Inst. 30" Sew. Pipe - 127' 4t Sta. "72" 80+02.56 (38.3' Lt.) ,����`„C% -m 3 m Const. Inlet Catch Basin (CG-48) w/o 28 Sta. "72" 81+63.61 (39.5' Rt.) ..3 Large Precast Concrete Manhole Adjust Manhole Shown Thus: • Const. Inlet Catch Basin(CG-48) X p Sump Const. Large Precast Concrete Manhole (See Sht. 2B-2) > 1 di P w/o Sump Remove Tree Shown Thus: J a it I-- Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 68' (60" Dia) 34 Detention Facility TOC Elev. 178.68 Remove Inlet Shown Thus: X . �`'a "b�c% i 100% PRELIMINARY PROJECT NUMBER\ PLAN SHEET el DESIGN May. 2004 --c See Sheet See Sheet co 8 0 ® 0 00 1/ 10 0 8 0 - i7.1 = CC CC rt ' ,.k' •.,' .-,-_,:s3t. '1/.• LO cl 11) _ - -____ _ _ ______- _ / .' t 7: ::70.1 c IT:■.:... - ----- -- r . CC , 1CL"189+19.63 , ' -.* Z ; ... 0 4 i "CL" Line Tc- T i A, c c...., 0 0 0 : / .. ---1, -co \(,.- / 'r-7.* 0 z t 4/../ 4( / . „ „ 14/ I 4 I ° I I kJ .- 'ET, ■- 4 4/ .• BP 37+80.06 = , tZ I 1L9 c.., :74"- i - ° j •. "DL" XX+XX.XX 1.1. "A I ± , - %%<( -:'- N,I I. .Z' L'' Line 1 I c, z L., , Temp. Ease. Area 3 ;_.1 E ,_2. ct .._ /c 0 i pi LLI .4( . 4,. I -T3 1;3 7 01 I I I It, 0(1-43$0 0 / , c,,) 0 AB LP::4128+79464495=-- CT) al I i 11' 'D 1 .:-.1‘i '/ - - (314 - - so @ . , ..c. Q., , / "BP" 48+44 39 = I .) . i ...I -a -12. In ' z -o -13L) in L° (n o 65th 12+20 99 l'''` T's •cct.i._- N 0 v, 12"-42' LI) T.-- , 614" 12"-.30' 1 )C3 ---`- - i ic...,; \ \, ( A se--, - - -40 i. = ,...,,,,, tr.___---7-a-____ • - ----_=-__,- ___:- - - - . -, 0 .._--- ,,,„ 0 g4(..*(,<-<= , ._. . - 0 --?- -, 15 ,0,-Ni..,] - .. .4ii,-........, ‘,07 10' .4-<4.1 1 CD / ' ' -. 000 + 12"-82' 12" 80' ' 12"-'t' 4 , drIti 0 ■ - 87 I .-7"141'... t12'-' 4 Ln -..,"_ 14 _r / o i 7 0 i frAtfrisitrIONIZAMIONIMMERNI“' ---"51'..:''' ..---: -- ---- '.. .t1. cz,"-•“--) -Tawagati' - - CD Itiki,::. K - __\__ _ _ _ ‘ .••=- - - 15'- - -- .._. 51' r:in gg , _ ___ -L_ __, _ _ . --- -- P i •• ". 18 _18 15'' I (1) ,I I 1 15" r - 0 i■., ,-_,E,3 95'i - 111 1 1 0 i ..-25%-_) c _ c SLOWER BOONES FERRY ROAD ! .i.,/' 0 00 Sbwcut Line . „ -- -- z : -I 1 115 90' ' 1 12 -52' 114 N88' 4 20 - LuMiVlaire ' I II 0 0 i Sawcut Line 0 1 I I 15" - 13' 0 1012 -13' (TYPO .4 of \ - 2 x 1 1 ......, _. t 0 ” - _i_ _- _--- - Grading L it 7 - - .„, ,k. - - 2' 1 ...1 li■ ....&..„, -_ _____ vIll (Fill) 0 0 / .1 .. ' . ' .. ''''''. /7-1\ •' \ 0 0 ' 2 I= 4 , li ;., . S' . . ° 4''Pe z 0 co Nt. 0 /4( ....... /110 "BPr 43+24.97 = . --- I RI) , -- k D 13.1 t..,I. Teniii. Eose.-Work Area F5 '/____'BL 9R1/w -- brading Limit - , / 0 cr) 2\ .' t _ , - - (Fill) ..- - -- 0 1 , , , ,-/--11---- 7 i 1 I '+ - I / "BP" LINE . ' I 2 p_ f q / • N.,. i- „ ' 0, . m .= ,1/ / u) :IC 0 1 / I VD , , 4.4 1 / I ' cl.cL 2 . 0 / Cl, Lc) 6 , _ , ‘.._i , , . - , , , o me ® a ® ® ® a © 0 See Sheet 0 o See Sheet "DL" Line 10 "BL" Line (1) Sto. "BP" 39+53 (53.6' Rt.) 0 Remove Extg. 12" 0 Sta. "BP" 39+78 (53.6' Rt.) 12 Storm Pipe - 370' Const. Twe "G-2" Inlet Const. Type "G-2" Inlet 0 Q- C) Sta. "BP" 39+88 (53.6' Lt.) 0 Sta. "BP" 46+00 (65.5' Lt.) 0 Sta. "BP" 49+12.80 (68.1' Lt.) Const. Precast Basin, 18" Deep 2 < Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 25' ROADWAY NOTES Const. Type "G-2" Inlet ' ConInst.st.15"Type Sew."G-Pipe 123'2" Inlet (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) Const. Manhole with,Inlete 0 Const. Sidewalk Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 30 - Inst. 12" cn(See LI- Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD720) (See Oregon Std. Org. No. RD364) (See Oregon SW. Drg. No. RD364) vzi.,(-/- Sto. "BP" 41+00 (53.6' Rt.) (See Oregon Std. .. 348 0 Sta. "BP" 49+61.75 (48.6' Rt.) Const. Type "G-2" Inlet c> 2 H w Const. Type "G-2" Inlet A\) La 0 Sta. "BP" 41+00 (56.3' Lt.) 0 Sta. "BP" 47+25 (55.0' Lt.) 0 Const. Standard Curb E=7" Const. Precast Basin, 18" Deep 0 Sta. "BP" 48+22.50 (64.1' Lt.) ( Inst. 12 Sew. Pipe - 207 cic oi Const. Type "CG-3" Inlet Const. Type "0-2" Inlet (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0364) Const. Manhole with Inlet, ..(See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) p (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD700) Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 80' Inst. 15" Sew. Pipe - 95' Inst. 15" Sew. Pipe - 87 '''-irdre\--$Gotitt'Infis: (;) i-j C3 st + 0 Const. Conc. Island, Type A (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD372) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) 0 Reconnect Storm Drain (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD348) Abandon Pipe Shown Thus : !:'1 0 4 0 c) la. u co cc in (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD705) ©3 Sta. "BP" 41+00 (41.5' Rt.) 0 Sto. "BP" 37+00 (69.3' Rt.) 0 Sta. "BP" 43+70 (60.2' Lt.) 0 Sta. "BP" 43+50 (54.4' Rt.) Remove Inlet Shown Thus: )8( ui cc 2 0 „, --- O. Const. Standard Storm Sewer Manhole Const. Type "G-2" Inlet Const. Manhole with Inlet Const. Type "0-2" Inlet Remove Tree Shown Thus: 0 c._, cn >- § >. Ea 0 Const. Sidewalk Ramp Inst. 15" Sew. Pipe - 90' Fill 2 Over Extg. 21" Storm Pipe Inst. 18" Sew. Pipe - 70 Const. Pre-Cost Basin, 18" Deep °CC ai I" I- (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0760) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) Cut 4 re Z Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 12' (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0348) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0364) >-- Ow0SUJ GENERAL NOTES: cc cc u- i- 0 4I '&3 0 Const. Conc. Island, Type A Rim El. 167.82 .< 6 z - (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD705) I.E. 163.40 (S) @ Major Adjust Manhole 0 Sta "BP" 45+20 (67.0' Lt.) 0 Sta. "BP" 43+50 (38.0' Rt.) All Storm Pipes to be Class V RCP -?.. I.-CO ec o C n 0 Connect to Extg. Manhole Const. Type "G-2" Inlet Const. Standard Storm Sewer Manhole Z Unless Otherwise Identified. CC W ,_ r5 I- 0 For Intersection Gradi I.E. 161.38± ON) Extg.ng See Sheet 15. (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD336) Inst. 15 Sew. Pipe - 13 Inst. 15" Sew. Pipe - 79' Over Extg. 12" Storm Pipe d ct OZccz Z CL 0 lit E < in 0 For Intersection Grading See Sheet 15 Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 67 (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 16' For Curb Return Data Tables, See Sht. 5B a.. I"0 IL 1 -I Z ® Sta. "BP" 44+40 (67.6 Lt.) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD360) „ Rim Elev. 170.74 0-© 0 03 to ; CL c.) 0 Sto. "BP" 42+50 (56.4' Lt.) cl Lu Const. Type "G-2" Inlet 0 Sta. "BP" 39+01 (53.6' Rt.) I.E. 166.43 (S) z . Const. Type "CG-3" Inlet eiy,,,,,, STORM SEWER NOTES Inst. 18" Sew. Pipe - 79' Const. Type "G-2" Inlet I.E. 166.18.± (IN) Extg. Org.rg. No. R0372) 4, C) Sto. "BP" 39+46 (53.6 Lt) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 52' (See Oregon (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) „ - 13,626 , ..gr. ■ it 4 Const. Type "G-2" Inlet (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0364),-, 0 Sta. "BP" 40+18 (53.6' Lt.) 0 Minor Adjust. Manhole (3.8) Sta. "BP" 41+80 (56.3' Lt.) h\ -THIS SHEET STAMPED AND SIGNED 4 -4t: 40 c, la. ce) Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 42' (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD360) 0 Connect to Extg. Manhole Const. Type "CG-3" Inlet Const. Type "G-2" Inlet i'-'\FOR DRAINAGE ONLY" "0?G. SiS6 Connect to Extg. 15" Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 13' Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 82 SHEET NO Inst. 12" Sew. Pipe - 70' (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. R0364) 1.E 162.94 (S) I EXPIRES *-31-05 I (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD372) (See Oregon Std. Drg. No. RD364) 5 \* I.E. 159.90± (W) Extg. 1 .... • c (o 7, :o, io.... MATCH INE 3.6"I +50 / SEE S Et,i 4A o o o o o o I ---- •••••••. - ! (-4)- (3) Z9'CI377 / I ii) i.\) = . (.4 (Ai) Z'9'S 1 '3'1 ' ol I 0 ,, ' ,,,, I I:,(-A . --% 52 DL 1 "Aa 001' _,• "f"-- :V .. .. Ii___ ■ 8 i c7 . ;al I .•+ — 4:• NI I ■ ' l'6;x3-(52 I'M .1 • 010 o a 1 (3S)100'99; '/ .° s . a(-i 1 1 . ... _44_, f (M);9Z991 'I . 116 4 --rn... + cp - • ______, 4($ UOR 3‘S 9Z*69I Yial3 Wel 8 S g 991 • a r 0 1;.. • aloiluo a un mOu I ! -HIV '; x3 6r*1+ ar(,-, • ^. N 00064-9f (...,• 4 0 (-7,ts - 5* -;-.'-' co u!698 O +9 C „d9„L‘: : ,17 z9Z• - .- •ilOGS P111041.100 U 1400S pa o.quoo un ---: Q0+80 - T. .. 'CI • + — O ! 0 ••• • JO.nS 'U3 004-- C dI3 MOI qbee 0+9C cI8 " r-- 86691 .....,_. ______ . ____ ....._ !* . I ..._ ____ ._,_ _I' _ ____ _ 2._+' . .-"- o• ! _ _ _ ___ ,. 4 r, 1 ..15'.(') ill . . ! , i -tij -i z • I , .:. er-COI --- i 4 1 i 3) 00 l' 1 '37 ; ' -1' 1 1 11 =T4' 1 f lc-L91 'Aa/ 001 I ; 06'il ,-2-1 . (n 0:1 Ll i I 1 k 64 , , . :., co Ial 10+ 06+ c co co : • .11 9.-P i I , 0) . r9132._ _ __ 8 (0) 1-- .0 i .37"low I . ! -I - , il (3 6c'£'91 3.1 f,- ...4 -ti2 L0'991 .., (3) CZ I 1 '3'1 i ... U 1 gg'L I .^913 01 ,„, : I ; ii.9.,!-; (---- : 1 1 i ,--. ,- 0Z+60 ' 3alul *4- ; li :1• i-Trzgi •nai voi , - o -.-0 ._ _____1:. _ - - -- 1---qa 1 ul rg-+ I.) . -o- - : 0-, :0 - -• NMI - • • ---3----- ' MI 1 + I 3 " a - 0 c..n .33"!Ri 1 (3) GL 29i '3'1 3 (41) 17f 1-9,1 37 __1111!"!L.- I P II 75 9**Z91 *Aa13 901 4 cc.4 91 •^ali 901 o I 4 ' 6 , Zt ia. CO o;rr, ) ' " 13: r °i ' 1 g ,...., (t. x 2.!.x. 1 ?alUI 99+ — -I- fri ;0 •7- 4 ! lattitet-o---. -+ , 4114 I 7■4 . . o . , ! II -I v..,1 zi 0 ' -' 0 • ,-.(4 . (M 16r91:3'1 ____._ .p. °II -1 o , . . 1 + - cb * I cb ..* I il P N).: 0 ; `.1..' 2... 11 ' (3 16r91;'3'1 ' .. 0 •. 1 . .11, Nt C -4. C . tv co'l a 41_ , 65-Z 1 'A013 01 ;IS i___________ .._ . . 4, I . -- 1%co I ---1 0 I --I a u + • . i 4 -o• I: I i + /...; ---I Ian th. rn o , ---7:41-11-111 : zi. i ' . ___1 — ._ (3)!L Z*91 437 X 1 144. i 7D . . . .10-4Nj, : _ _ e (M),L Z 4,91 37_ _ l(N) Og' 91 '37 \ !to ' r- c) o i li Of 991 A a/3 01 ' \I 1 P- 1- 4'991 'A9/3 DO/ 'CD rn - z : . . .191L/1 + + i i z I x i Z .-.;I i P 1 ,Ialtil 00+ \ I1D"- --1'9 ' M 2.1 1 i II -- . I . I ; cs) • --° .' •• -4--i---- -, -,-- :-ri,'2.-(4 ---, 2. • 'I 1 (3) S'L'*9 ' 7 l- 4). i ccb). , 11\._ (4 ) cL*9 '31 1 co'''''?. • N.) I Al 1 ._._ .. _ _I .....,. (11, - *0'691 'Aa13 001 RI__ _ ._ ri + : ---t o _1 \ -61 11 : • lalul 09+ ., 1 -13 x . , o • 1 :"' °'9 ' ki coq 1 t ' CO • t, Ft', • -.'.].r:..":ql li q' - Itl —0 z (M) 91'g 1 '37 ,. ■1 . o „,.. i 1 1691 tt G9691 'AL -Xi- co 3 ':I --• - . . LI.I. 8,i; g+EP 11 PO• r- lalu 0G+ ' . iv ' cb \ Z ' ',..k : , M • 1 0 ka • . 4'4 a d. 1---- 4 (A o- -4• 1\ 11 ! 1 ; i o ' o 01 ' .... I (N) 05.'991 '311 , : : , , , co 1 I 1 1 6 11,/• an : 1 60'1Z1 A013 00 I • - -•- -: o - - ---- , ' . _.1 a r,Z1 —114.3- ik I .(40--Z r , \ ; 0 It : V) (3) Z Z-* 1 '3'1 ' • . ii-0 . (1) 1 :.'1-211.: c9_ZIVZ1, m 4 1 4 1-- L -6; I 0 grizi 4 F.,,.:§4. a, 'il r- 9Z!OZ I 'nal 901 liti • ,, 7' , olu, 0Z+4 o . -. ` cc ' 1 1 :-.'" ... 1 I - o i ' -c c) 7., W i ult■:14"-' 11\/ 0 (M) 9g4,94, '37 isa ' k , ( ) 9g*9 0'3017 1•• - , 1,1 I X I ) Q... OriLi 'Aso ‘1 o ' , 1 la/u/ 04+ . ,1‘6,-.cri,,9I-ri 111 rr, ! + . Q.x i 1 t.•) 0 ,-. . Pul I 4 : . ! z 9 ITT cp (it) Lir* 1 '3'1 cd. + ---- -. -.1- 0 i 1 -1) _ Al . (13) L91,51 37 . % 1-1,ite, "-i o 1 I . . ; 5. 0 Eitiz i ./t au ow ,I.--.01, ' gtwt i 1 .-.7",.. 1 -• lap) oz+ 1,1-ncl. 0' !.. Ok+C* ' 1 + _o__ • \I If ; , . I . (M) Zg'491 1 i ' I CO ' fl-`11 (3) Zg91 '31 , .- \-; 4- 1 az f---rti 0.) 991i t AT-3-001- , o ; .. 1 Z-• PAII 00+ r-to o : t t \',1 ) 1 1 • G. 'Vt (141 n43. \ .t.- I--- ----r , li 1 i / 1 •- 1 I , 1 P.(bo .I el `ii 5",f° 9 I •; Q. 1 , . K a i 1,_.00 2 1 li -. I 1 1 i (XI cck; -4. , 1 . -.I " ' : I NI 40 -.uz. . 1 ai . (M) fE1.991 '37 1 - t I CA D 1 + -- - i . I _Cr__ .---; 0 —71 : I 07 rz49-91 27 o I r•I 0, t..,z, •A,,3 ..., , _ . ! : 111 , Jut gE+ 1 . 1 -• il ''') • i bo i I MU', t .1 'to . 1 :-,-- t \ t . - 1 t ' . 1 4,.. ' i I . (M) C9'991 '33;14A41- 1 40`)...,1 co . , -t- 11 , . ti) S' 91 A li' ,7 I t o . > : 7 > LOLL al3 00 -TID ' , 1 . .I I 11 ' 11 law! pi • vill“---- 7c1, 1 i 0 _ ____[„0 I I . ..., .., _ _...i._ I u- I —4E= 1. .51?'• \ ' H1 M • ; , , (.0). I r-, ' 1 -,1 i (-9 r. • I I -.1.. I \ v, a 3, I 1 s r' p.' . (0 -la (M) 66'991 '37100 ' o. 99'EL1 I 1.1.1 (c) 0 I ,-, ■ • 1 . --4 # t .2.1.•.,_ p '--T.-P-1 oreiff.- 1 v 18. 09'6Z1 I -I— 1---- ---1 1.- --.1 ' ' --(3S)-#.... *A, - o to ' 1 00+6* CZZL1 iial3 at..ii. ___ , o )t,-) ' 1. .7' wv. i icl --"'l -r- -.7 .r. ;a/ Pry iret -+ —11•1 I I, .r--i CA .. 1 : al • P = Ilk "--4 • .q.C4 -C)-- \ + — ,1 __ In, o,--, 4. 1 i . I cri ' (MN) Pe Y91 '''l -- i al -o I 1 i i ■ 0 (3). PrZ91 '"1+11•1 ( -“11 Ul 0 I : ::, p ; I G6'ZL 'Aa/3 00/oil I • -I• 1•+1 , , 8 , ! k ! ii u-ti i 1 s ,:-.) , MATCH LLE 50+5 I 1 I – 1 • . --.-- ...----:se. L n 1 1 ,, ' i ''' 1 3 lt x 1,.. .co,„ a-3 , A 4$' 4:%. Z-L."-----i. .`:,; .....--..._.--,....■,-1- t:-.A • i , i J— , —.1.—. . •Ic,5,,;0, - z' .,,,,v. 4i,12.. rG, ( , co 8 .-:1 - co m o 0 NJ co 105 r" '''' a' %1 ':..lt• PRELIMINARY, INCOMPLETE DRAWINGS - NOT FULLY APPROVED BY GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS io 2 2 i__ .L. 111,40 SEE COVER SHEET FOR ARPLICABLE NOTES AND INSTRUCTIONS. 73 11ii i -(.. BRIDGEPORT ROAD / . .DWG: NO. REVISION DATE BY APP. x , co LOWER BOONES FERRY ROAD , Addendum #2-Drainage 4/23/O4REA ... (-1 A UPPER BOONES FERRY RD. TO S.W. 63RD AVE. . Addendum #1-Drainoye 4/19/04REA a U1'11 WASHINGTON COUNTY 013E161:NED J10§4111):1..D3AXITE-1, 1FC "DRAINAGE ONLY 3/04REA z >z P PROFILE SHEET FM ! .4?■-; 2 3 (7.:!•:,, CHECKED 75X Submittal 3/04 x EPC to ! e.1 EA ‘.., STA. "BP" 36+50 TO STA. "BP" 50+50 - - — , Drainage Revisions Issued For Permits 11/03 --- ---- - -- - ' ❑ RCI Constructs 3roup PO Box 1730 • Sumner,WA 98390 Phone(253)863-5200 • Fax(253)859-5702 ❑ RCI Construction Group Construction 12480 SW 6816 Street • Tigard,OR 97223 • Phone(503)968-5941 • Fax(503)968-0782 Group ❑ RCI Construction Group/Civil & Industrial PO Box 1730 • Sumner,WA 98390 Phone(253)863-5200 • Fax(253)859-5702 LICENSED&BONDED a _RC' Construction Group/Environmental GENERAL CONTRACTORS& PLANNING PO Box 1668 • Sumner,WA 98390 "An Equal Opportunity E� Phone(253)863-5300 • Fax(253)859-5702 www.rci-group.com APR 2 8 2004 CITY OF TIGARD 4-pk2eli i7 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: City of Tigard Date: April 27`h, 2004 Job No: 823 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Attn: Matt Scheidegter Tigard, OR Re: Bridgeport Traffic Improvements 97223 Plan Revisions We are sending you. 21 Attached ❑ Under a separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Submittals WI Plans & Specifications ❑ Samples ❑ Subcontract ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Estimate ❑ Copies Date No. Description 1 04/19/2004 13 Plan Revision sheet no. 2B, 2B-2, 2B-3, 2B-4, 3B, 4B, 5, 5A, 8, 8A, 7 1 04/26/2004 13 Plan Revision sheet no. 5, 5A THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: O For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval. OFor your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution REMARKS: Please replace corresponding plan sheets in your plan set(s). Copies to: Signed: R ISON CO7RUCTION, INC If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. waenington County,Oregon '2004 03:00:29 PM 2004-083285 RETURN RECORDED DOCUMEr ): Cnta1 Btna19 K BARNEY J CITY HALL RECORDS DEPARTMi;NT, $25.00$6.00$11.00.Total a$42.00 CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. . Tigard,OR 97223 1111111MM 11111 1 111 1 11111 Hill J .` Tax Statement Mailing Address 00621706200400832850050050 /� �f I,Jerry Hanson,Director of Assessment and Taxation „�, .. File No S D1` KoD3—40Q(7 and Ez Dflielo County Clerk for Wuhlnpton County, v:.t Yd Oregon,da hereby eerily that the within Instrument of wrltlnp was renlwd and rewrded In the book of '• } ids records of said county. 1 I `r;R C�" :J•� Jerry R.Hanson,Director mint:411%d Taxation, :':.5".y.'■V Exdnlelo County Clerk DEDICATION DEED WASHINGTON COUNTY,a political subdivision of the State of Oregon,does hereby dedicate to the public for right of way purposes,the real property located,in the Northeast one quarter of Section 13, Township 2 South,Range 1 West,W.M.,In Washington County,Oregon and described in the attached Exhibit"A" and"C"and shown in attached Exhibit`B"and"D": To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantor hereby covenant it is the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances,they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described. The true consideration for this conveyance is $ 0.00. However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this 2.4 day of Mal. ,20 O it . I Washington County e 155 North First Avenue,Suite 300 Chair P oTem, ashington ounty Board of Commissioners Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 ,Ll- -�-�-��-`�-`.�- - -��-�.� . �J Pf �,, OFFICIAL SEAL J� I) CY,s BARBARA HEJTMANEK IJ () ` � NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON ( COMMISSION NO. 369771 STATE OF OREGON ) " MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG.11,2007 1 )ss. County of Washington ) f This instrument was acknowledged before me on 'r'lr'-1 24/200 if ,by So het ke a e r as Chair Pro Tern,Washington County Board of Commissioners. j 1 LOOZ'l I•'911V S3aIdX3 NOISSIWWO AIN ,, ?1� ,Bax Q, ged.4.14.1.42...4„,....ak I.LL69£ ON NOISSIWWOO y No Signature () NOJ3LIO - OIlBld AIdb1ON - �I) '( )I3NVVI.L 3H vavaade 1 �� 1 8 - I! -07�b'3S � IOId�O ��•� � My Commission Expires: ST Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this 2-1 day of —1 v+‘e-- ,20 b 4- Ct(91... P.(a L.A.,......---,a—a--- City Engineer ii iii1111 iI III iIIII iii ii 11-6 3300 NW 211th Terrace Hillsboro, OR 97124 P 503.858.4242 F 503.645.5500 DESIGN GROUP,INC. www.ldcdesign.com "AREA NO. 11 " February 27, 2004 Legal Description A portion of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 13, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, County of Washington, State of Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 2-Inch Brass Disk marking the East 1/4 Corner of Section 13, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian; thence along the South line of the Northeast % of said Section 13, N88°50'31"W, 1384.39 feet to a point on the South line of that Tract of Land described as "Parcel 3" in Book 931, Page 497, Washington County Deed records and the True Point of Beginning; thence along said South line, being also the South line of the Northeast % of said Section 13, N88°50'31"W, 23.63 feet to the Southwest Corner of said "Parcel 3"; thence along the Westerly line of said "Parcel 3", NO3°28'15"E, 197.59 feet; thence leaving said line, N61°53'33"E, 11.44 feet to a point of non- tangent curvature; thence along the arc of a 369.00 foot radius curve concave to the Northwest, through a Central angle of 15°09'25" (Chord bears N09°14'35"E, 97.33 feet) a distance of 97.61 feet to a point of tangency; thence along a line parallel with and 51.00 feet distant and Westerly from the Centerline of SW 72nd Avenue, N01°39'53"E, 122.87 feet to the Westerly line of said "Parcel 3" thence along said line, N11°52'50"E, 33.83 feet; thence leaving said line, along a line parallel with and 45.00 feet distant and Westerly from the Centerline of said SW 72nd Avenue, S01°39'53"W, 441.16 feet to a point of non-tangent curvature; thence along the arc of a 35.00 foot radius curve concave to the Southeast, through a Central angle of 1°11'47" (Chord bears S39°35'11"W, 0.73 feet) a distance of 0.73 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence along the arc of a 471.00 foot radius curve concave to the Northwest, through a Central angle of 1°16'11" (Chord bears S39°37'23"W, 10.44 feet) a distance of 10.44 feet to a point of tangency; thence S40°15'29"W, 7.22 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 8,172 Square Feet (0.188 Acres). The Basis of Bearings is S88°50'31"E along the South line of the Northeast % of Section 13, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian per Survey Number 29,487. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SU-VEYOR AJO El F.LWOW, /'EGON JULY 11, 2000 CINDY A. HALCUMB 58928 LS EXPIRATION 06/30/05 6)414 1131T 11111111 11111111111 111111 Ill ♦ VICINITY MAP 2004-83285 (NOT TO SCALE) I 1 SW . 30 ncx. ST ,o o N 5 R 1"=400' I e�,°.G� (se N11'S2'S0"E �p y FERRY RD 33.83' 14� QC �'�.�T- 8 9 10 ' w NO1'39'53"E c^° _ 122.87 AREA 8,172 SF ► (0.188 AO ACRES "P w CIS VIEW N61"53'33"E COUNCIL 11.44' , ,� 3 ` 31 4 '�? Z 1 13 12 �." 0, °R h FOUND 44" IRON PIPE w FOUND 2" BRASS RECOGNIZED CENTER DISK IN MON BOX OF SECTION 13 4 EAST 1 4 CORNER BA IS OF BEARINGS - SN 29,48 R OF SECTION 13 £88150131"E 2656.38' I r\\ 10 .....,Ni d �Z 88'50! 1"W 1384.39• o N88'50131"W /� 23.63' S4015'29'W 7.22' / I P.D.B. HOMES 82 TU VALLEY / / \ / I REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 83 1 LANDS RVEYOR I j CURVE DATA TABLE 0 EGON JULY 11, 2000 NO LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD BEARING CINDY A. HALCUMB C1 97.61' 369.00' 15'09'25" 97.33' N0914'35"E 58928 LS C2 0.73' .35.00' 111'47" 0.73' S3935'11"W EXPIRATION 06/30 C3 10.44' 471.00' 1'16'11" 10.44' S393 06/30/05 ww�,i 0 iM1i01Y rd.d N. OPUS NORTHWEST .7D7 Li= AREA NO. 11 2751 1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1130 airveYars IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13 PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 Design uR Inc T. 2S., R. 1W., W.M. w.. (503) 916-8963 2oREOON 97124 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 1 PHONE:(503)656-4242 FAX:(503)645-5500 ` 2751SA11�110 2/27/04 CAN \ 1 w , w.ldcdnlgn.com 6,4tii43lT ' 1I lIIIIl 11111111111 111111 I►I 2004-83285 L 3300 NW 211`h Terrace Hillsboro, OR 97124 P 503.858.4242 F 503.645.5500 DESIGN GROUP,INC. www.ldcdesign.com "AREA NO. 10" February 27, 2004 Legal Description A portion of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 13, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, County of Washington, State of Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 2-Inch Brass Disk marking the East % Corner of Section 13, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian; thence along the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 13, N88°50'31"W, 1408.02 feet to the Southwest Corner of that Tract of Land described as "Parcel 3" in Book 931, Page 497, Washington County Deed records and the True Point of Beginning; thence along said South line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 13, N88°50'31"W, 107.81; thence leaving said line, N40°15'29"E, 23.70 feet; thence N49°44'31"W, 7.00 feet; thence N40°15'29"E, 15.00 feet; thence S49°44'31"E, 7.00 feet; thence N40°15'29"E, 51.41 feet to a point of curvature; thence along the arc of a 369.00 foot radius curve concave to the Northwest, through a Central angle of 03°04'03" (Chord bears N38°43'27"E, 19.75 feet) a distance of 19.76 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence along the arc of a 27.00 foot radius curve concave to the West, through a Central angle of 48°10'20" (Chord bears N13°06'15"E, 22.04 feet) a distance of 22.70 feet to a point of tangency; thence N10°58'55"W, 21.07 feet to a point of non-tangent curvature; thence along the arc of a 346.00 foot radius curve concave to the Northwest, through a Central angle of 10°45'51" (Chord bears N26°08'27"E, 64.91 feet) a distance of 65.00 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence N61°53'33"E, 22.20 feet to the Westerly line of said "Parcel 3"; thence along said line, S03°28'15"W, 197.59 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 10,084 Square Feet (0.232 Acres). The Basis of Bearings is S88°50'31"E along the South line of the Northeast '1/4 of Section 13, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian per Survey Number 29,487. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ND S RVEYOR OREGON a. REGO L. JULY 11, 2000 CINDY A. HALCUMB 58928 LS EXPIRATION 06/30/05 Esti ; el' ...viii IIIIIIIlI IIIl II ■ VICINITY MAP 2004-83285 (NOT TO SCALE) p Is z sw"° 9�Q \ 3O c:)W HNDLAY ,\ c"' , 8 ST. c;,64- c, 1 =100 G' Sl ±sW LOWER z 0�op. BOONES 0 5 y FERRY RD m° oF��� S 9 10 a ! ' I ____I I ACRES COUNCIL VIEW N6 1'5333"E 22.20' 1 w Lj AREA i" \ 31 10,084 SF V / Z 14 13 12 (0.232 AC) i 0) r. FOUND 314" IRON PIPE N10 58'55"W FOUND 2" BRASS RECOGNIZED CENTER 21.07 ./' DISK IN MON BOX OF SECTION 13 C2 EAST 1/4 CORNER S49'44 31"E 7.00' C..,0 OF SECTION 13 N4015 29 E 15.00 N49'44'31"W 7.00' ` Idh 1 N40'15,'29"E 23.701-- I. !/ 1,— N88 50'31"W 1408.02' N88 50'31"W 7 107.81' / \N. , PO �/ BASIS OF BEARINGS S8850'31"E 2656.38' — SN 29,4871 TUALA TI / 82 VALLEY f I / \ 83 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL / LAND SURVEYOR \ 1 J 611ci-_ 46- DATA TABLE OREGON CURV E NO LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD BEARING JULY 11, 2000 CINDY A. HALCUMB Cl 19.76' 369.00' 3'04'03" 19.75' N38 443'27"E 58928 LS C2 22.70' 27.00' 48-10'20" 22.04' N1306'15"E C3 65.00' 346.00' 10'45'51" 64.91' N26 08'27"E ` EXPIRATION 06/30/05 J OPUS NORTHWEST �� l'uniarvie)nfieerosrrss nAREA N0. 10 2751 LDC gi1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1130 IN THE NORTHEAST N1 O/4 OF SECTION 13 PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 Design roue,Inc T. 25., R. 1W., W.M. [L.:. ] (503) 916-8963 H3LLSBORO, OREGON R712 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 1 PHONE:(5D3)858-4242 FAX:(503) 645-5500 2751SA10.DMG 2/27/04 CAN 1 www.Idcde.Ign.com „ EycN ,13$1 p RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO Washington r Oregon 2004-116418 CITY HALL RECORDS DEPARTMENT, 10/07/2004 .15 AM CITY OF TIGARD D•E Cnt=1 Stn=4 A DUYCK r� 13125 SW Hall Blvd. $20.00$6.00$11.00•Total=$37.00 oil Tigard,OR 97223 CORPORATION NINO 1E1111 INN 00665750200401164180040044 /� I,Jerry Hanson,Director of Aatan merit and Taxation 5b DD� /ooi l and Ex-Officio County Clark for Washington County, $.• `� File No (/V PY Oregon,do hereby certify that the within Instrument of ..% ECO writing was received and recorded In the book of records of said county. {,_ , �r- Jerry R.Hanson,Director mint and Taxation, ,ttk .• Ex-Officio County Clerk EASEMENT PERMANENT PUBLIC UTILITY A 9 Space above reserved for Washington County Recording information BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, hereinafter called the Grantors, grant and convey ▪ unto the City of Tigard a perpetual easement for constructing, reconstructing, operating, maintaining, inspecting, and repairing of public utilities and appurtenances, together with the right to remove, as necessary,vegetation, foliage, trees, and 7 other obstructions on the parcel of land described in Exhibit "A", situated in the City of Tigard,Washington County, State of • Oregon. D THE TRUE CONSIDERATION for this conveyance is $ 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. �— IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any right, title, or interest except those expressly stated in this easement, nor otherwise prevent Grantors from the full use and dominion thereover; provided, however, that such use shall not interfere with the uses and purposes of the intent of the easement. Grantee shall not construct any structure or other improvements on the property that will interfere with parking, access, ingress, or egress, as shown on the attached Exhibit"B." Grantee shall promptly repair any damage to improvements on the property caused by Grantee. IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said Grantee, its successors or assigns should cause said easement to be vacated, the right of the Grantee in the above-described easement will be forfeited and shall immediately revert to the Grantors,their successors,and assigns in the case of such event. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described and granted premises unto said Grantee,its successors, and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this S day of 0 C.Tt4rc1.- ,2004. BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE,L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company rte ; OFFICIAL SEAL By: Opus Northwest,L.L.C., its manager W,74� ERIN L JORDAN 4' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �" COMMISSION NO.368819 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 19,2007 By: Its: t ce- P eta ff • [ .!WI.frt- �*+flC-1st STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on O&I P°14 T'` (date)by �I1 n g�I (name(s)of person(s))as � �/.,t — •' / A A..... (type of authority,e.g.,officer,trustee,etc) of DP it 5 A t . S (name of party on behalf of whom instrument was executed). Notary's Signature s /9 /� My Commission Expires: / // tk Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this '4 day of C3 CFO ,20 D•4 P• � -t Ci ngineer NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT I.\ENG\PUB-FORM\PUB-U-C0.DOT C:\DOCUME—I\pauli\LOCALS—I\Temp\GWViewer\TIGARD WATER LINE EASEMENT BRIDGEPOI 2004-1 16418 I IIIII'II III EXHIBIT A L 20085 NW Tanasboume Drive Hillsboro,OR 97124 P 503.858.4242 F 503.645.5500 www.ldcdesign.00m DESIGN GROUP Exhibit "A" Page 1 of 2 Water Line & Structure Easement September 29, 2004 Legal Description A portion of the East'r4 of Section 13,Township 2 South, Range 1 West,Willamette Meridian,County of Washington,State of Oregon,being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 2-Inch Brass Disk marking the Easy'/,Comer cf Section 13, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian; thence along the North line of the Southeast V.of said Section 13,N88°50'31°W, 1300.21 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence leaving said line, along the arc of a 18.00 foot radius non-tangent curve concave to the West, through a central angle of 89°29'23" (chord bears S10°35'44"W,25.34 feet) a distance of 28.11 feet to the Northeast Corner of Tract"A", Partition Plat No. 2004-016, Washington County Plat Records, at a point of non-tangency; thence along the Northeasterly line of said Tract"A", S10°32'23"E, 37.19 feet to the Most Easterly Northeast Corner thereof; thence along the East line of said Tract "A° and it's Southerly extension, S00°32'18"W, 180.85 feet to the point of intersection with the Easterly extension of the Southerly line of said Tract"A";thence along said Southerly line,and continuing along the Southerly line of Parcel 3, said Partition Plat, along the arc of 751.00 foot radius non-tangent curve concave to the Southeast, through a central angle of 07°23'59"(chord bears S71°19'07"W,96.92 feet)a distance of 96.99 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence leaving said line N15°14'33"E, 45.10 feet; thence N01`39'53"E, 158.74 feet; thence N86°26'01"W, 67.54 feet to the Easterly Right of Way line of S.W. 72"d Avenue; thence along said line, N40°15'29"E, 97.21 feet to a point of curvature; thence along the arc of a 471.00 foot radius curve concave to the Northwest, through a central angle of 1°16'11" (chord bears N39°37'23"E, 10.44 feet) a distance of 10.44 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence along the arc of a 35.00 foot radius curve concave to the South, through a central angle of 90°33'01" (chord bears N84°15'48"E,49.73 feet)a distance of 55.31 feet to a point of tangency; thence S50°27'42"E, 25.83 feet to a point of curvature; thence along the arc of a 18.00 foot radius curve concave to the Southwest, through a central angle of 16°18'45"(chord bears S42°18'19"E, 5.11 feet;) a distance of 5.12 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 24,342 Square Feet. The Basis of Bearings is N88°50'31"W along the North line of the Southeast 'A of Section 13, Township 2 South,Range 1 West,Willamette Meridian per Survey Number 29,487. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ,;AND S; RVEYOR O- i'E ON Y 11. 2000 CINDY A. HALCUMB 58928 LS EXPIRATION 08/30/05 1 1:\ENG\PUB-FORM\PUB-U-CO.DOT C:\DOCUME--1\pauli\LOCALS-1\Temp\GWViewer\TIGARD WATER LINE EASEMENT B , IIII 'IIIIIIIHII1i111 2004-116418 I VICINITY MEP ° !s 41 / W (ID . 4, NOLAY ,\ 2 J ! sw LoEER / O FERRY 2 ,9¢\Oi. in BOONFRD I ^ry� cr // ° - LAND LLG m oo iyc / >' epIQGEPOR ( ' QOC. IJO. 97061240 / 1 FOUND -3(4" IRON PIPE / \ FOUND 2" BRASS RECOGNIZED CENTER \\ DISK IN MON BOX OF SECTION 13 EAST 1/4 CORNER / .' BASIS OF BEARINGS - SN 29487 OF SECTION 13 � ' S8850'31"E 2656.38'4 ,,' , C3 ,,,,, 885p'31`W 1300.21'\`��� . , ,,,,, CITY OF TIGARD + i i iji'ii,,7i,-1, ,' -.7.`,\ CITY OF TUALATIN c�\ �,�/ S502742 E �;;. Cl o I + %%%` 7 // / / , .,,,;',/,//////it,'//////7/1/i/ . �, +,;'%:'%%,,,,,,/ ASEM'ENt 510'32'23'E STATE 0� OROUGH / AREA ,, N8626'01NW x;;24,342 SF;, 37.19' BY 5T D E HIGHWAY 1/ 67.54' ::';':,:'�:�.'.;, ITS COMMISSION / { 29) /,',7,p;;;,',-;;;;,,/,.( .� . . x,43-6 if,R ., Ed �4�9/5� / PARCEL 3 ';;,/f,,TRAGTIO m r I! PARTITION PARTITI Q .—CURVE TABLE / T NO 1al ,/ �. PLAT N 6, 3NO LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD BEARING I PLA 6 ' <'''J; 04;0,1.; Ci 28.11' 1$.00' 89'29'23"25.34' S10'35'44/ Ir 2004_01 ! ';',3,,%;-;°///,%,,,"47,:,; C2 96.99' 751.00' T23'59" 96.92' 57119'07'wj 1 O7 22;;/;"/;:.';',;42;;;;', N C3 10.44' 471.00' 116'11" 10.44' N39 37'23"E I ///i3/4',/;;;/2/0./,,%;fi ' pp C4 55.31' 35.00' 90'33'01" 49.73' N84'15'48"E I2 '/i'i'�ii��'i%���� I6 C5 5.12' 18.00' 1678'45" 5.11' 54218'19"E 1 •:' %7 '%' '''';•,, REGISTERED VILLAGE IAN "�- ' '.:' ''.;''.',', PROFESSIONAL '� 9. %%` %' ,,,%' ANDS VEYOR d' ^ ,,,7,,'.,qI J J , ..- G PORT ROAD LY1 ,2000 >-----__,----, 5 BR1DG CINDY 58928 ALS HALCUMB ..--- EXRIRATION 06/30/05 • 't 'DRAWS ERLI NOR NO; OPUS NORTHWEST riC p�""�'s sfm:RI 7 EXHIBIT "A" 3104 1000 NW BROADWAY, 51.111E 1130 SLrveYors WATER UNE & STRUCTURE EASEMENT PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 Dap Gmap CITY OF TIGARD {503) 916-5963 20005 NW TA AmOURNE DRIB SHEET Na rat.5ea60,CRCDEH 57124 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 2 WWI 003)656-4242 FAA.(50.7)61S-S5E0 3"H" a/m/o1 ctiv '2 1:\ENG\PUB-FORM\PUB-U-CO.DOT C:\DOCUME-1\pauli\LOCALS-1\Temp\GWViewer\TIGARD WATER LINE EASEMENT E ...MIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIII EXHIBIT B I/ISM OPUS NORTHWEST 1000 NW BROADWAY, SUITE 1130 PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 (503)916-8863 I:\ENG\PUB-FOR.M\PUB-U-CO.DOT •as C Planners Erwtmera Surveyors ASV VW 10013 14W TAI WOU NE 1RRE HI W LSBORO.0110011 67124 PN011L(1M 656-4242 rNt(502) i•0100 d1466W WILL PARKING EXHIBIT VILLAGE INN WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON UOPPEN 004 , r,,,6 '► 3104 MET W0, WI C:\DOCUME-1\pauli\LOCALS--1\Temp\GWViewer\TIGARD WATER LINE EASEMENT E 10/13/2004 /111;111 /0e—.... conditions Associated With 10:12:25AM TIDEMARK Case #: SDR2003-00017 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Condition Status Updated Code Title Hokt Status Changed By Tag Date By I REVISE ARBORIST REPORT N 10'13/2004 MAS 10/13/2004 MAS 1. Revise arborist report to include street trees in the mitigation calculation. 1 DETAILED TREE PROTECTION PLAN None Met 10/13/2004 MAS 10/13/2004 MAS 2. Submit detailed tree protection plan for trees around the impact area. The protection plan must be reviewed and approved by the City's Arborist. 1 WALKWAY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS None Met 10/13/2004 MAS 10/13/2004 MAS 3. Provide and implement a plan that shows the proposed walkway at the vehicle access to be constructed with appropriate landscaping,pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials. 1 72ND AVE ST.VACATION DOCUMENTS None Met 9/16/2004 MAS 10/13/2004 MAS 4. Provide evidence that the proposed street vacations for the realignment of SW 72nd Avenue have been recorded. 1 JOINT USE AGRMNT/CROSSOVER ESMNT None Met 9/16/2004 MAS 9/16/2004 KSM 5. Provide copies of the joint use agreement and cross over easements. 1 BORDERS CENTRAL ACCESS R/IN-R/OUT None Met 10/13/2004 KSM 10/13/2004 MAS 6. The existing central access to the Bridgeport Land,LLC(Borders)shall be configured to provide right-in/right-out only turning movements. Plans shall be reviewed by the Engineering Department. Page 1 of 1 CaseConditions..rpt __ J uesaay,uFtober u5, 2004 12:12 PM Walter H. Knapp 503-265-8117 0.02 i 1 RECEIVE - ocr o s Zooa Walter H.Knapp CITY OF TURD Silvicn1trtre& Urban Forestry A� /" "R1NG November 21,2003 BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE— VILLAGE INN/BORDERS SITE ARBORIST REPORT I The Bridgeport Village- Village Inn/Borders Site has 63 trees ger than 12-inches in diameter located within the City of Tigard. The trees appear to be in fair- o-good condition,based on visual examination. f wo of the trees larger than 12-inches will be removed, and 61 7%)will be protected and . •.i. In addition,a small(10")bilgleaf maple will be cut. S' more than 75%of the trees ger than 12-inches in diameter will be retained,no mitigation be required. A summary of I' .- tree species, sizes,and dispdsition is shown in the following le: a , Trees to Remain Trees to Cut DBH Douglas-fir Bigleaf Maple Total.- Douglas-fir Bigleaf Maple Total (10)* _ r (1) (1) _ 12 2 1 3 14 5 3 8 16 5 5 1 1 18 6 6 i 20 4 4 (18,16,20)•* I 22 3 3 _ 24 8 8 26 11 _ 11 I 28 5 5 — _• 30 2 2 p 32 1 l 2 2 34 _ 1 � I 36 2 _ 2 38 1 1 i I Totals: _ 57 4 , 61 2 2 11. , * 10-inch tree shown for information only. **One tree, trunks Number'of trees larger than !2 ches in diameter: 63 Number of trees larger than 2 ches in diameter retained: 61 1 %retained: 1 97% Mitigation category: No mitigation required I 7615 SW Dansttmlr Lane,Beaverton,,OR 97007 Phone:(503)646-4349 Fax:(503)265-8117 I 1 /2004 Conditions Associated With 110/1 10/133 5AM TIDEMARK Case #: SDR2003-00017 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 1 REVISE ARBORIST REPORT None Met 10/13/2004 MAS I0/13/2004 MAS 1. Revise arborist report to include street trees in the mitigation calculation. 1 None Met 10/13/2004 MAS 10/13/2004 MAS 2. Submit detailed tree protection plan for trees around the impact area. The protection plan must be reviewed and approved by the City's Arborist. 1 WALKWAY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS None Met 10/13/2004 MAS 10/13/2004 MAS 3. Provide and implement a plan that shows the proposed walkway at the vehicle access to be constructed with appropriate landscaping,pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials. 1 72ND AVE ST.VACATION DOCUMENTS None Met 9/16/2004 MAS 10/13/2004 MAS 4. Provide evidence that the proposed street vacations for the realignment of SW 72nd Avenue have been recorded. 1 JOINT USE AGRMNT/CROSSOVER ESMNT None Met 9/16/2004 MAS 9/16/2004 KSM 5. Provide copies of the joint use agreement and cross over easements. 1 BORDERS CENTRAL ACCESS R/IN-R/OUT None Met 10/13/2004 KSM 10/13/2004 MAS 6. The existing central access to the Bridgeport Land, LLC(Borders)shall be configured to provide right-in/right-out only turning movements. Plans shall be reviewed by the Engineering Department. Page 1 of 1 CaseConditions..rpt Robison Construction Inc. Tree Protection Plan Village Inn Site Development Project RCI Job #855 Village Inn Site Work Robison Construction,Inc • Table of Contents 1.0 Overall Plan 2.0 Project Overview 3.0 Tree Protection During Construction 4.0 Permitted Activities Within the TPZ 5.0 Tree Damage Appendix: Definitions Exhibit 1: Tree Protection Barrier Details Exhibit 2: Limb Damage Repair Details Tree Protection Plan 1 Job#855 • 'Village Inn Site Work Robison Construction,Inc 1.0 Overall Plan The purpose of this document is to detail RCI's means and methods for protecting established trees during construction activities at the new Village Inn Site in Tualatin Oregon. This tree protection plan will not address specific trees and/or areas,but will rather be used as a guideline for working within the proximity of established trees and their root zones. Preservation of established trees should be considered for several reasons. Among these, trees should be considered for preservations because: • They stabilize the soil and prevent erosion • They reduce stormwater runoff by intercepting rainfall and promoting infiltration • The moderate temperature changes,promote shade, and reduce the force of wind on adjacent structures and vegetation • The filter pollutants from the air and prduce oxygen • They provide a habitat for animals and birds • They increase property values and site aesthetics. Damage to trees from construction activities can occur in many ways, and successful preservation hinges on identifying potential hazards and providing a plan to properly prevent them. Common construction related damage can occur from the following: • Mechanical injuries to roots, trunk, and branches • Injuries by chemical poisoning • Injuries by grade change • Injuries by excavation • Injuries by paving operations Tree Protection Plan 2 Job#855 'Village Inn Site Work Robison Construction,Inc 2.0 Project Overview Robison Construction, Inc. has been selected by OPUS NW, LLC as the site-work contractor for the new Village Inn restaurant in Tualatin Oregon. Major items of work to be performed under this contract are: • Sanitary Sewer Pipe/Appurtenances Installation • Storm Pipe/Appurtenances Installation • Waterline Installation • Embankment/Excavation • Grading • Concrete Flatwork • Asphaltic Paving • Landscaping/Irrigation 3.0 Tree Protection During Construction 1) No person in the construction of any structure(s) or improvement(s) or any activity shall encroach or place solvents,material, construction machinery or temporary soil/spoils stockpiles within six feet of the area outside the drip line, as defined herein, of any specimen tree, or any tree within a tree protection zone(TPZ) 2) Before development, land clearing, filling, or any land alteration, RCI will erect suitable protective barriers as required by the Inspector, including but not limited to tree fences, tree protection signs, and erosion barriers until completion of site work including landscaping. (See Exhibit 1) 3) Materials for active tree protection shall consist of chain link fence, orange laminated plastic fence, wooden post and rail fencing, or other equivalent restraining material. Additionally, each tree to be preserved should be marked with ribbon and or a colored water-based paint. (See Exhibit 1) 4) All tree protection devices must remain in functioning condition until the site work is complete. 4.0 Permitted Activities Within the TPZ 1) Installation of utilities using directional boring to protect tree roots (excavation shall be tunnels) 2) Sodding and ground cover. Placement of sod or other ground covers including ground surface preparation for such covers 3) The clearing of a path for new road right-of-way limits Tree Protection Plan 3 Job#855 Village Inn Site Work Robison Construction,Inc 5.0 Tree Damage Any tree designated in the plan to be saved which is damaged during construction or as a result of construction as determined by the Inspector, shall be treated according to accepted National Arborist Association Standards, or replaced with a tree or trees equal to the unit value of the tree removed. Damage to tree branches shall be remedied per the attached drawing(See Exhibit 2). Tree Protection Plan 4 Job#855 Village Inn Site Work Robison Construction,Inc Appendix — Definitions Caliper—The diameter of the trunk of a tree taken 6 inches above the ground Critical Root Zone (CRZ)—The minimum area beneath a tree which must be left undisturbed in order to preserve a sufficient root mass to give a tree a reasonable chance of survival. The CRZ will typically be represented by a concentric circle centering on the tree's trunk with a radius equal in feet to one and on-half times that number of inches of the trunk diameter(Example: The CRZ radius of a 10 inch diameter tree is 15 feet) Diameter Breast Height(DBH)—The standard measure of tree size for those trees existing on a site that are at least four inches caliper at a height of 4.5 feet above the ground. If a the tree splits into multiple trunks below 4.5 feet above the ground,then the trunk is measured at its most narrow point beneath the split. Drip Line—An imaginary perpendicular surface of a tree's branch tips down to the ground. The circular are of land surrounding the tree from the trunk to the outermost branches. This ares is not to be confused with the CRZ. Tree—Any self-supporting, woody perennial plant usually having a single trunk diameter of three inches or more, which normally attains a mature height of fifteen feet or more Tree Protection Zone—All lands that fall outside the buildable area of a parcel required to remain in open space, or all areas required as landscaping strips or buffers according to Tree Protection Plan 5 Job#855 Exhibit 1 TREE PROTECTION &t NLRAL M Er,- o5 CORRECT FLNCIN6 INcos tc-r FENCING (f "' '' ' ,... Z.- it �•: 1 DRIP {p , l l ilV • jib ''•` + 1 f1 ill ;.-.4,,, 4\ 1 ,S;.1 1 I II "6 kp lit 1 '■ I TRCL ROOTS AR( IROTLCT[O TOME 00013 NOT /ROIfRLY /ROT[CTtD Install at drip line of tree branches estortCTION /NC✓r ARLA PROTECTION IN FILL ARCA ro..IN ...t) � �.t J CO' SAC K AM O `b.-r' ��,•/' SLLCCTIVLs.Y `[CL ) RtMWVL (1RAarCMC ' .y� E / Mtrl TO COH/[NSJRTC t :� L (� J NN[ FOR 10OT LOS> ` �J . 1 f w ,1' I % ....0.—• ;f DRJA I • 1 UNL ,1 OIY 1 40-17,4"."•-••—..,�J� I Jars FILL i /`1.+[11 rrtTslfi 1 l I .. • f. (.< �✓'�' 1 11 ,... I ',•4, �� l �.[ )� �r`�� ♦ .. !Tu.0 ---.) ' r ' MMfrr[D ��f�4 D� s»T[s.. STONt R[xs0VAL OF ROOTS Ali $0,004.0 MOT LaG LCO /3 00 101TlM TVNNCLL I r4 6. PLAN SECTION 1.\\,i I I 14:Z2 t C }r ' ............ ---...... ir\ic---.? TVNNCLL ING VNDLR TRLL ) PALS ICIt Vrs FCLDCR RMTS Exhibit 2 Repairing Damaged Tree Limbs • 1j . Y 2 ,. 1 Trim bark wounds with a 3 tapered cut,then apply 1 \ \ tree paint. Collar Incorrect Correct 4,1 ill\1 fv t ` 1 lLt I • "' prune damaged branches • with three cuts to avoid • I ` ; �' t�B:"�� peeling bark from the 1 I tree trunk when limb falls. /\ 'Li%i, . .0 II ilp7i Tree wound Trim and taper r j 2 ■ . . . .. . .. .. ,. - LEGEND I E3ostTNC toNrEllaus RICE I I I I i ` 1 C 0 U �� C I g E asnw oEaouas TREE 1 I(900) (1000) I (1100) 103) 1 w ACRE S r ':,,.: , {� ,' , E TO OE le (e00~) E I t - ;�; , Wit xaouws 1 ' 1 I I I O. I - ... / TREE 70 if Rf},O�fO 1 ' ! .. = ,,� ��,.�STREET TREE g .- � o TO BE REYOVN I � 1 _ (LOGTEDM���D,a) I MARC TREE UNE I , �.. I I `.MI6.11•0 (LOCATED FROM NR PNOTO) D PROTECIECiM RAMC FOR TREES _ - _ S.W. FINDLAY STREET I (.1 500 10 600) I � - - - - #A '/• NOTES: 1 �( II I /�-` I - _ ■ • 1.PROTECTIVE FENCING FOR TREES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE I� .17 - DRIPLNE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A CERTIFIED AMORIST. I I 1 ,� _ _ ', 2.EVERY TREE MAT IS REMOVED SHALL BE REPLACED IN I,1 :: , ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY OF TIGARD'S TREE MITIGATION i 1 i 1 , I STANDARDS AND UNDER NE SUPERVISION OF A CERTIFIED t.y R. _J ARBORIST./ — . ; I Tai ( ry r 1 (100) zar roF'1U A ° — \-- JP,,--.41 ,"-.:1: F 1 i it) �li CI'%' ., 41,%,, . 11154 I 01 4 1 : .,*.:, ,',.-1 ',,;:7, 101 2( 00) 1� � A1U % (�7. ig ig g, ifs ,....."D I , /7100p./.. §, 1 oi, ) 1(AOe) 1 7, , , I. Li/ .�/ `0�0�/ BFI Z I 1 1 I VILLAGE INN II 1(500) 3 ��, � 5 IAI SITE IN 1 // 1200) I 1 ' , REMOVE EIOSTING TREES j C/ E1fACT LOCATION TO BE OETEMRIED 1 p 1 1 //�� \ 4( AT MRRWENEENTS AL DEAN of QFF-9TE ■ 6 //j/i (1100)N. \ A 1 1 1 11`2„% (701) .. W 2. / sac a w Fro 1 1 //// \ \ 1 Inch 100 ft. S I i °R /Vii' / 6U0) PREPARED BY: 1 /// i ,, i I 1 a .;',/ \ LDC 1 / /'/ \ $ / Design Gmuj Inc + 1 /�s/ (500) \ x / Planners .. / ARCHITECTS VAN LOMOCOMPANY Engineers e. — '� VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT �"�y°rs MO N.R.2RDI TERRACE 1 TREE REMOVAL, PRESERVATION AND MITIGATION PLAN "°ka can 2 34 NW First Avenue,Suite 309 10noio3 T'GARD, OREGON Portland,OR 97209 ©COPYRIGHT, AARACHIITECTS VAN LOM+COMPANY C 503.226.0590 • 3B L J .A evdl x A. :ts`L 3 tS+i 4'i. �.-' z• t L.a�r 7'z�. '°h''a. `."iva'.a..€�'';Mv �`'.e''r t.S.'wY���.'' ft ti � � `� r- ''i. �, ��4,�. wd �,�,a,ts i -. ., 'i f.. }L a 1.• 'iii F ,nre.,,' - '. !. 'tf.ir'� a .3Yc ,G -a.. rt a ..0 >v 3� .c- s� ` r ei' lP" "$'7 ••�.,wA �' » + ' m t& ' g�„ ,.*•' '' POP,:'--;;;"0,'i": PS ", y 4W f ry a Tipi ie �� .ter tixs -,- z. s:? , :q--.4. 2 „. S Fa a- ts� �4 yiftt •_,Villi x r3`4. ..„ ., Ee . 1GA" . t ` � • Vit: wNA mi:4441^4k6f-e -w.i� �� s - . e u g.' ., ,i 'V'r. � i.ir ""i` v }`1*-- r ��'4 �� 4p.�4 r. P . '� 1,'44.1***'L';v t d{=�1fZfir if 3 iiitf kfi - i'''7• *oft Pie plication rMeeti l '.otes ,.re Valid or ix Months 14 f-� -g `4� � ,n T .,_.gxn , PA ..+5.w. .� . .-,-�.s�....s. f19,,,:cma�...,, Rz RAMi i �rr-1.;. rm.- . � _ �,*,e ,xw _,r_. t" NON-RESIDENTIAL ►G GNE 8/qv3 sNF,r MT/1N APPLICANT: --pbg 1 rot.? AGENT: To. Ic,j Phone:(206) '161- 600o Ily • PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: (7500 i/0/00 S C-✓ V4,41,,,A,, S•.,,,G '% • TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): 1St 2609-UV,lot //sr Z6 c0-Noi/i 6 i 90o//5l26cig/oo, Soo NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Sr k Pe,.tIQP.nc r Rev, • PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: I g (OOO' xt,v r on {v At \ OMPREHENSIVE PLAN 141) N MAP DESIGNATION: . (t x`,rj (Jse Gor,�`n, ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: Nue, CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM C.I.T. AREA e s�- ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. 520 ) . MINIMUM LOT SIZE: b' sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 6 ft. Max. building height: Zoo ft. Setbacks:'1- Front 152 ft. Side ft. Rear ft. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %. *Mae, frees-14Il "" -L4 i4 sc-Back=ro'/Zo'di,c..,,41r y te-5t4(4.1ka(TanG• I vj/NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. III * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residen6alApp1calion/Planning Division Section 4 I ✓r NARRATIVE [Refer to Code Chapter 18.390] The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should rev' the code,for applicable criteria. , I v1IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system andthe noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.1651 Minimum number of accesses: -V3oor I)CSo' Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.705.030] WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provigilk convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, andindustrW complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.730] D STREETS: feet from the centerline of D LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. D FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.8.1 BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: • A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; D All actual building setbacks will be at least half('/2) of the building's height; and D The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. F,BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter,18.1451': In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code,in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even ,. not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fence` utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. Scr'u4m, er- ki y amus From 21?/cjctio/fs CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential App&alion!Planning Division Secfon 4 • The ESTIMATED REQUI ED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: ✓ LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18:745,18.165 and 183051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. S / pe-r 9e- mF Iw„oycucd area (' RECYCLING Meter to Code Chapter 18.755) ' Applicant should; CONTACT. FRANCHISE:HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersectionof two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. (PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 REQUIRED parking for this type of use: re,4110 3.7A,000 60 WI 0-x s I/1,ODD GGA • Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: re-stave/44h 6 15•3f1,690 GF4Gx (9.//I,mp t, Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): P NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ,-1.„ /we".r.t ii-ly > Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6'inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. Sal( 41(ow ch oicoroti¢ > Compact parking space dimensions: 7feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. - f^'.18.Z6S- Note: Parking space width includes the width of a:stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space: Note: A maximum of three(3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ' > All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. > BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Dieter to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY.OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential'Applcation/Planning Division Section ( ) BICYCLE RACKS [Referto Code Section 18.7651 .! 14/ erfun5ron i:4-(64 vN ly, • BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and convenient locations. octal,t^ �Pi of exts{tity bilk rat&c 0.3/I,ctO6FAf - (e_fkil' n SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 I.0/1,coo 6F+4-cc.fiqygdnnkitty 4111. The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will atternpt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas atthe pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775:080.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. [217- CLEARWATER SERVICES[CWS)BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria:, The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: .. • TABLE'3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 yyM1am„,3a 9..a „> ..x, EI58S.' t+rdt N_*1=._,. .s.--:r .F-sa- ..+I.'O.�e.?aNr`,•i^. .3s ._;,_�_rx.....: f . . ...,.�EnN•,cuSsnI-DJ' EN � VED ” A TS®ERINI _ . e Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% + 10 to <50 acres 15 feet e >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre '. <25% 50 feet o Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres 'o Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% + 10 to <50 acres 30 feet >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • : Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting e. . Streams withintermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine(break in • Naturallakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' °Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated sprin boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of � feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serveas a starting point for measurement 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from thetop of the ravine and setsthe outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical,report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference.Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Appkalion Planning Division Section • ' Restrictions in the Vegeta ';orridor: 1 • NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the .111 CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended ' for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. -_If_there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS ServiceProvider Letter is not required. jf"SIGNS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. (TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18J90.030.CJ► "PP tic A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is.filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location;size and species of all existing trees including trees designated • as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than.25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees.over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used 'by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THEPERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. 1/ MITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18.790:060.EJ IP &re,reioviu( REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: • ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CIN OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential ApphcationIPlanning Division Section • 0 If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or Would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance • with the following formula: 0 The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estima caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasona available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. D The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. , • • 1-V(CLEAR-VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1951 ' The City requires that CLEAR 'VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN- THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:. 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless HAI, parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CNAPTERS - 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Director's Interpretation) '. 18:630(Washington Square Regional Center) :..18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) L';18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ✓' 18.780(Signs) 1R .......,1-..,A(1(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(temporary Use Permits) 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) _'18.790(Tree Removal) _,18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) a' ✓` 18.795(visual Clearance Areas) - 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 'If-18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) _ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) V _18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) t '18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) _ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) _ 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) ,X _v_: 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobd Home Regulations) 1`- 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) "''✓ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) - 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 7'.. 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) III CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential AppfcaGonWPlanning Division Section IIP' 111 ADBITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMEN • YotA will nem( TU c(LGf $1iow wtta r 7KX1o15, propte4Tes a!Z InctvcidwiTh is l 2I,co/ttn. Ili-AK2eW-s l J' .1 2 ac b -i c ro., R c p ca oseJ et >70°42+C-e4/►St oh W tet, r) Stf,i rr Sjttito .,45 -addrtf,4 (" pori (3../UAL k ,wy Reavi ce ,r?5 - e; art;[,or++t. edcesh 4 al�Gas (Lk /uw., � �i ra t.-414 ress -rJ la w.tdti, or-wl&way4 /(L 'e...x0,,,c 8cve.4,G(& �ilre.rl~a /ndd/ 011.4- o17s(rv{to✓15) 2 siory �,llJ,iy G+11•7h/- porlc,„, - u oku�. (wedparig",„ l�1,,,t,o4vr.e. tc oICC4c, provlGILD WMC, jyT et/any fccuib(5 - MGZZattr�l. - 15 1.11(5. 4. lie- (o,4fl ( / ?ro✓u(ca 5Nleu rj 1lie. olyeG{'Icee,5, OP Pa, 1119140A.cti ci,,al4r ?lad? : (as I!mak1 L, nexv5t //014 froporlrvrlal( ) IQ!o✓loltnq N/te. $.9t til ,MJl Zl est 055t�y • t) f n st aien (Alp rove0441..t (Atony 4tc4..i 4,,rg/Wcdf II s)ll9grao<(Aq 'ftu_. Piny rocket Wt.fit t vey,jvikr, yto(taAdfc do 51 1” (/ ,n dt,t-u rt 4 1,5 vPh ( It JJeyLare. privw:Ac-/ ,6��Ict� cLt ' r&v'e./ - tF no ?%tJf rrlC-ft.gr,. �/-1' ?LfvL0et."-cues n0 kd it hov)tt( ho1p(vi.It Itt r jt� - b c r k. tr,Prove�u44/li, i f pro poscpt or' (` ✓rrt4., w,a(I P�0✓1/`t r l w,r o✓t 9ynse,I's rul f�P.✓tt t/ ffv(�i( ar JJ - pro`/i01. et Olt al rca c/'ttO tn� turrstny P2oves4.s.4b= Per. t!oa_ott^AJ (Ara( . PROCEDURE ✓ Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making. a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall. offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. ' Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE.to.8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 8Wx 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative.decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. 4111 The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted A�., (materials are required. I 1 P 11 L '"S" 5-boo o*1Li 3co14c5 (Ad/(illy r coM A1C Wiwi. Ida.c�"tarCotirL Ciderni.Inu*e+7'lar(.t✓G41 YNat(tt' 14“ CITY OF TIGARD`Pre-Application Conference Notes 44 f ir��a-Pk'•3 rsaen/1 . v Page 7 of 8 NON-Residenfial Application/Planning Division Secton 4110 I The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an. application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or • protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the pu hearing. A 10-day public appeal period fojlpws all land use decisions. An appeal on this ma would be heard by the Tigard Kt:u(14,6 0f -i c.r- . A basic flow cha which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public;hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow.the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS S BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted 'until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application 'notes;do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would preventthe structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished, has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first buildinq permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and.notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related site planning that should applyto the development of your site plan. Failure of.the staff to provide information required by the Codshall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. Itis recomrnended that a pros ective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staffrelativeto Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER'A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). r PREPARED BY: I6w+ I/u A� 0 I As' 50 c t emit,/(a.nrut' CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4111 FAX: (503) 684-7291 E-MAIL: (staffs first name)@catigard,orms TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS:www.CLtigard.or.US • H:lpattylmasterslPre-App.Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 3-Oct-02 • (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residental Application/Planning Division Section liM �l•Vtous pa---a C(14/03) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR CONY ------------`-�- .- '---,0 ��� [t'1in. /71 / �'M 4f.'f 115 Yycc,� i'�p��ul�y' SGt�t �._..__+ �S✓4GG1ii'R:s ct 1,t4.;0-F- r- - - �/ / T 't7 "� u/! ✓Gc.r�c�.�lk. _7� C F- r. lla� �v �r �. •• �. . ttn e. Miry �r+vwt '1. op o- i SlIifr re-la,( area 5td,li C4,s 4,!-GrA.�-S,' Eryo(as1 PY`�•l'se7 ae,d r-1440F v✓cuI4 pro rcG ,o, • a iw.k.. ct.f l4 ri 6hUcilire. -17t./10(0-fil-4al /q.7(75. 060 -TG r€ 'r e- G2,-) Df extwyt f,S -- cp rlLt9 pii-il/L/-vr- trl tiCIt1J4t,Yt/Y1 park 477 Ilhailtf CL'i e'x&r.1 p(23 Ci f2 -cc CPc_3i, Il'r�",FIKtri Fcit-tu„ 1.4 fi) [al. inJe-vrtocied. 2vr P- t5Rt'ljlC propo4 uceh-. P"ii c;yur(fi !e ( tele 11-OSS,, 5 ((af . Jf ; n(21- luwsc�,,Ve (o Ilea._ A°, 140-X:({ni 'a- (pi)-CLInl LiaaSe,A oil y�iie/ Z) I int.1.1l�. ci 414-tst/tiarr.C.1 hf'lD.t1:n eft br— 6iun/llf.!'dLirompa-c(-/I--(.,,,(-Lauf sp.ft,6, a% uN4I as , I or-. �kj✓a-f`, ra t/t.. or-i�. i(i c'e- u.✓ravel-. t-r LO✓r7 ([ - G�)t. A I Ke-vvvwr�el� biofe pC rLi✓ty ('teli.iitreAlts► ; yrra r'vu",1 meet .n✓e�f1f4 .4., 1LO 11.4(5w 5 S!e 1 iare4 54tt,niliA444 4- 11ia 1419 9 wrc, RP-y/ A I (.,,.4.4el 1 Cl • f ♦ 1 '�Jr9.i?` �I i't 0, �r l2�2, ac /.(� .. Llan-- " /',,„ > - tAILAAi k Ce i dirtil a Wail �r 9 1,, Itillja tti atY.;A, i fl 156/o 6" w411 i-U,t . . . YY rf���T74»4l n.'i c t�ri 0� Ott; Sc za .wavl 7 9_/o1K��t c.� 7� IpA�,tu�rD� L: .e.: !ot" f''-. e-c(, • e-K •IO ►�,-t Wt i ,e# 1 . ' w _,.., Dr d z 1/I 1 L wrtp `'. -t,Pearly f1Jc r� u 1f_(bs ii,,,,,,Aa , Oi 1 C/11'4.14, f qw(5 I LS awtL-Vl7sk.- your 1/3.tri di nt -1 • p�r rx(1. 41J1't. e-"" tri r t orl i I etc f !l t&.6 O.0 0a�Yt J t.10 in 4.t P`;* // � � t1� l77 Tlv.- �' l0 C,i..�j7wCt;✓i i.t. 1 l�rp vt:�� r f L( .119 ..1t.rale. t ru t5 _ 1O L ou�FieI, i,t,a(t r>4� S/9't ctppl (dim u:ai /4 I�ov( L also r'Zr1t`G (r` ill&it Hit 4 M"Y I 6,4 el- l(c;,tr a4.3r. li y ).Jo � ',Ctel l o-1111 1n ?itis diDWu-nia.. PROCEDURE 44 En}t.,atin :t�tli y tsS /�.s- no„ In)laic exspr., c / Administrative Staff Review. - iehPrrvio s=.:,o oeibie,tatiL Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. """1 �'P ` `',p``�_ Public hearing before the Planning Commission, f rub Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing{shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF,MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices., PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail.or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division'acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Mas submitted withan application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), z 8' "x 11"map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall hot be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete `within 30 days of the counter 0 submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF'TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential AppricatIoniPlanning Division Section CITY OF TIGARD • LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre-application conference: This checklist identifies what is required for 'submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, 503-639.4171. Staff: Morph Tru, Date: 7/31 /b3 1. BASIC INFORMATION Please refer to the"Land,use applications basic submittal requirements"checklist for the basic submittal requirements. 2. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIE• WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: O Arborist Report/Tree Assessment [9 Local Streets Traffic Study - ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report O Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Geotechnical Report-far bi',(din ,.,,if"arid,mho"' ❑ Geotechnical:Report must addressliquefaction potential and soil bearing capacity ❑ Other 3. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers. the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One,copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8A x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION`FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If theplans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel.it is not applicable,please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties . 111 ♦. Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑• • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 4 h:5pattylmasters\checklist.doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) *sting Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ • Contour lines (2'intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ • Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ s Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes-in excess of 25% ❑ e Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential _ ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils El o Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings o Trees with >_6"calipermeasured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements El = Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Locations of driveways on adjacent properties and across the street. ❑ ap • The •roposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicin map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets El Name addresses and telephone numbers of the owner,developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as•applicable) ❑ Scale, •rth arrow and date V ❑ Bounda lines of tract to be subdivided Names of :•jacent subdivisions or namesof recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lin-. related to a City-established benchmark at 2'intervals for 0-10%grades and 5'intervals for grades great. than 10% El The purpose, I•cation, type and size of all of the following(within and adjacent to the proposed-subdivision): • Public and p 'vate right-of-ways and easements ❑ ♦ Public and pri .to sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ ♦ _Domestic water ains including fire hydrants El • Major power telep one transmission lines(50,000 volts or greater) ♦ Watercourses ❑ o Deed reservations fo •arks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees ith a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at-4 feet above ground level El • The location of all struct es and the present uses of the structures,and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting V ❑ Supplemental information inclu• g: • V Proposed deed restrictions(i :ny) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision o subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including ro outcroppings,wetlands and marsh areas faiThe proposed lot configurations, lot siz c s and dimensions,and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for urposes other than residential, it shall b- indicated upon such lots ❑ If,any of the foregoing information cannot b acticably be shown on the preliminary plat,it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 4 h\pattylmasters\checklistdoc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) - - - , - - - - - - a. -nt Plan •. e owner of the subject parcel ❑ Th: owner's authorized agent El The -.p scale, north arrow and date ❑ Propos-• property lines ❑ Descriptio of parcel location and boundaries El Contour lines ' intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes>10%) El Location, width a-d names of streets, easements and other public wayswithin and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all perm: ent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of . water courses ❑ Location of any trees wit' ."or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and propo'-d utilities and utility easements ❑ _-> Any applicable deed restrictions El Evidence that land partition will not • -dude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing e ting and potential street connections El Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ o Easements on the site and on adjoining properties • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions El The locations and dimensions of the following: o Entrances and exits on the site 0 o Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas El o Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ o Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and.recyclable material areas ❑ The locations,dimensions and setback distances of the following: e- Existing permanent structures, improvements,utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • . Proposed structures;improvements, utilities and easements on the site 0 o Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ e Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions . ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: o All areas to be landscaped ❑ o Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ City of Tigard Land Use.Application Checklist Page 3 of 4 hapattylmasterslcheddistdoc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) 410/ 0 *ndscape Plan Location of trees to be removed -I / - Location, size and species of existing plant materials/pe r'cc.. e, 64— gw5�i y')t% alw.t in 1 ui►ascUe' j 0 General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ e Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil El • Erosion control,measures that will,be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas,and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan - Proposed right-of--way locations and widths - . ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision El Grading/Erosion Control Plan Thelocations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios E PlanIilities Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitaryand storm sewers with'grades and pipe'sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of-valves and meter sizes ❑ Fire hydrants(existing and proposed) - ❑ Proposed fire protection system El Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan _ • The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ ... Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimatedsize and dimensions of proposed water quality/detentionfacility Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan , • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ • Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal(Section 18.790.030) ❑ • A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings • Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 4 h:lpattylmasters\cheddisLdoc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) 18.360.030 Approval Process • 18.360.070 Submission Requirements 18.360.080 Exceptions to Standards 18.360.090 Approval Criteria 18.370.010 Variances 18.370.020 Adjustment rri�uc.tl� 18.520.030 Uses -Table 18.520.1 18.520.040 Development Standards -Table 18.520.2 18.630.020 Development Standards 18:630.030 Pre-Existing Uses and Developments within the Washington Square Regional Center Mixed Use Districts 18.630.040 Street Connectivity 18.630.050 Site Design Standards 18.630.060 Building Design Standards 18.630.070 Signs 18.630.090 Landscaping and Screening • 18.630.100 Street and Accessway Standards. . 18.630.110 Design Evaluation (If this route is proposed) 18.725.030•Performance Standards 18.705.030 General Provisions 18.745.030 General Provisions 18.745.040 Street Trees 411 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening 18.745.060 Re-vegetation 18.755.030 Materials Accepted 18.755.040'Methods of Demonstrating Compliance 18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas 18.765.030 General Provisions 18.765.040 General Design Standards 18..765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards • 18.765.060 Parking Structure Design Standards " 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements . 18765.080.Off-Street Loading Requirements • 18.790.030 Tree.Plan Requirement 18.795.030 Visual,Clearance Requirements • 18.795.040 Computations 18.810.020 General Provisions • 18.810.030 Streets " 18.810.040 Blocks 18.810.050 Easements 18.810.070 Sidewalks 18.810.090.Sanitary Sewers 18.810.100,Storm Drainage 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways • 18.810.120 Utilities