Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SDR2011-00002
SDR2O11 00002 TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2011-00002 TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER TIGARD 120 DAYS = 10/6/2011 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER CASE NOS.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2011-00002 Tree Removal Permit(IRE) TRE2011-00010 Tree Removal Permit(TRE) TRE2011-00014 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two existing, multi-tenant, industrial buildings. In addition the applicant is requesting removal of two trees within lightly limit significant habitat area. There is a wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area, but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. APPLICANT: VLMK Consulting Engineers OWNER: Tigard Distribution Center LLC Jennifer Kimura c/o Deering Management Group 3993 SW Kelly Ave. 4800 SW Macadam Ave, Suite 120 Portland, OR 97239 Portland,OR 97239 LOCATION: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Rd.;WCTM 2S101BD,Tax Lot 200. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise,glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request for Site Development Review and Tree Removal subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-0(X012/T1GARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 1 OF 23 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: Cheryl Caines 503-718-2437. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. If discussions with the neighboring property owner include plan revisions, then the applicant shall submit the revised site plan for review and approval prior to issuance of site/building permits to ensure Tigard Community Development Code (1DC) standards are still satisfied. In addition, if the Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter is amended as part of these discussions, then a copy of the amended letter must also be submitted. 2. Prior to issuance of site/building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval that shows a walkway crossing a vehicular way that is a minimum of 4 feet wide and no longer than 36 feet. 3. The applicant shall provide additional street trees along the eastern and western portion of the street frontage to meet the spacing requirements in section 18.745.040.C. 4. The applicant shall provide additional parking lot trees within the front, middle, and back arking lots to meet the "one tree for every seven parking spaces" standard in section 18.745.050.E 5. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit a mitigation plan to the City Arborist for review and approval. The plan must have a signature of approval from the project arborist certifying that it meets the requirements of 18.790.060(D) and that the species and placement of mitigation trees has been reasonably calculated to provide for their growth to maturity. The mitigation proposal shall show the species, location, and spacing of mitigation trees in relation to buildings, infrastructure, existing trees on adjacent sites, street trees, and each other. 6. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a cash assurance (letter of credit or cash deposit) for the equivalent value of mitigation required (e.g. 136 caliper inches of proposed mitigation tree planting x $125/caliper inch). Any trees successfully planted on or off-site, in accordance with an approved Tree Mitigation Plan and TDC 18.790.060.D,will be credited against the assurance two years after all of the trees are planted. After the plan is approved and the trees are planted, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the City Arborist to certify that all of the mitigation trees were properly planted per the approved Tree Mitigation Plan in order to set the starting point of the two year tree establishment period. After the two year establishment period, the applicant shall provide a re-inventory of the mitigation trees conducted by a certified arborist in order to document mitigation tree survival, and compliance with the approved Tree Mitigation Plan. The remaining value of caliper inches not successfully mitigated shall be paid as a fee in-lieu of planting. Failure to plant and provide documentation of mitigation tree planting by the project arborist within 6 months of certificate of occupancy issuance shall result in the forfeiture of the cash assurance to the City's tree fund. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,ATTN: GUS DUENAS 503-639-4171, EXT 2470. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 7. Before any work commences on-site or on the public improvements, the applicant shall apply for and obtain a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit from the City to cover half-street improvements, sanitary sewer,easement restoration and any other work in the public right-of-way or easement. The plans submitted shall include private water quality and detention facilities as part of the permit application. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans stamp ed by a professional engineer shall be submitted for review to the Development Engineer. NO E: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements and detention and water quality facilities that have to be inspected during construction and monitored afterwards. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). NO110E TYPE II DECISION SDR2O11-(NKIu2/11GARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 2 OF 23 8. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Development Engineer will delay processing of project documents. No work shall begin until the PFI permit is issued. 9. The PFI permit will cover all water quality treatment work on the site. The applicant shall provide on-site water quality treatment facilities as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Development Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 10. The PFI permit will also cover all storm water detention facilities on the site. The applicant shall provide on-site detention facilities in accordance with the approved plans. The applicant shall provide on-site detention calculations as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20) and ODOT. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Development Engineer for review and approval- prior to issuance of the PFI permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan for long-term maintenance of the facilities shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20) Chapter 2. 12. The applicant shall comply with the conditions of the CWS (Clean Water Services) Service Provider Letter. All work to comply with the CWS conditions will be covered and inspected under the PFI permit. This includes review, inspection and approval of any work performed within the vegetated corridor. Easements required as part of this work shall be delineated and submitted for review and approval under the PFI permit review and approval process. 13. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control dunng the construction phase. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION,ATTN: Cheryl Caines 503-639-4171, EXT 2437. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 14. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall contact the Staff Planner, Cheryl Gaines, 503-718-2437 for final walk-through. All site improvements must be completed per approved plans. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: GUS DUENAS 503-639-4171, EXT 2470. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 15. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements in accordance with approved plans. 16. Prior to final inspection,easements required to meet CWS vegetated corridor requirements,reviewed and approved under the PFI permit process, shall be executed and recorded. 17. After water quality facilities have been installed, the applicant's engineer shall submit documentation to the Development Engineer certifying that the water quality facilities were constructed in NOTICE TYPE!!DECISION SDR2011-00002/'I1GARD DISIRIBUI7ON CENTER ER PAGE 3 OF 23 accordance with the approved plans and comply with CWS standards. 18. After storm water detention facilities have been installed, the applicant's engineer shall submit documentation to the Development Engineer certifying that the detention facilities were constructed in accordance with the approved plans and comply with CWS standards. 19. After completion and certification of the water quality treatment and detention facilities, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City on City-furnished forms for long-term maintenance of the facilities. The agreement will be recorded and the City will be inspecting the facilities periodically for compliance with the terms of the agreement. 20. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a disk of the as-bunts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development,and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates,referenced to NAD 83 (91). 21. The applicant's engineer shall submit a final sight distance certification prior to City approval of the completed project improvements. 22. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant must pay the fee-in lieu of undergrounding for the overhead utilities along Hunziker Road.The fee shalr be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be based on$35.00 per lineal foot. The project has 850 lineal feet of frontage.The fee-in-lieu amount for this project is therefore $29,750.00. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Vicinity&Site Information: The 6.4 acre site is located south of Highway 217 on the north side of SW Hunziker Road. The site is zoned Light Industrial (I-L) and developed with two large industrial buildings with a mix of industrial tenants. Other properties in the vicinity are also zoned I-L with industrial uses. Two vacant parcels zoned Industrial Park (I-P) lie near the site at the intersection of SW Wall Street and SW Hunziker Road. There is a railroad spur on the east side of the building. Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and did not find a record of the original site development review. The City does not have a record of the original site development review approval, however, a minor modification was granted June 21, 1999 which approved additional parking, repairs, and upgrades to the site. These improvements have been completed and are reflected on the site plan. In December 1999 the applicant received approval of a Site Development Review (SDR1999-00018) to construct a 9,450 square foot addition and 25 additional parking spaces on the existing site. These modifications were never constructed. Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to expand the parking lots on both the north and south side ends of the buildings and a revision of existing parking areas on the west side of the building to comply with current city standards. The applicant is also proposing to install two new garbage enclosures. Architectural upgrades of the south elevation are also proposed, including the addition of a canopy. Façade changes do not require a land use review in the 1-L zone; therefore those changes are not discussed within this decision. In addition the applicant is requesting two tree removal permits in order to remove two trees within habitat area. There is an existing wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area,but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR201 i-00002/'I'IGARD DISTh IBUTION CENTER PAGE 4 OF 23 SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. In addition, staff posted two notices on the site, visible from the street. Staff received one comment via e-mail regarding the proposal. Eastside Van and Storage owns the property to the north of the site. This property includes a flag portion that stretches south to SW Hunziker Road. Mr. Keith Ashcraft with Eastside Van and Storage commented about how the proposed rear parking lot will block access to a billboard on the Eastside property through an existing gravel road across the Tigard Distribution Center property. Mr. Ashcraft asked for assurance of continued, unrestricted access. In addition, he asked for a like understanding that this proposal would accommodate their parking needs and free up his property (flag portion) from their needs except for access only. STAFF RESPONSE: The issues Mr. Ashcraft raised are not directly related to the approval criteria for the parking lot expansion. These comments were passed along to the applicant and both property owners have come to an agreement that ensures access to the adjoining property without further disturbing the wetland on the Eastside Storage site. This compromise includes a possible plan revision. The applicant is being conditioned to submit the revised site plan for review and approval prior to issuance of site/building permits to ensure Tigard Community Development Code (TDC) standards are still satisfied. In addition,if the Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter was amended, a copy of the amended letter must also be submitted. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts B. Additional Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 (Visual Clearance) C. Specific SDR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONING DISTRICT Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the I-L zoning district: Tight Industrial. Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that the development standards in Industrial Zoning Districts are contained in Table 18.530.2 below: NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-OIXX)2/T IGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 5 OF 23 TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-L EXISTING and PROPOSED Minimum Lot Size None 6.44 acres _Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. Approx. 300 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 35 ft. 80 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lotsi1l 20 ft. N/A -Side yard 0/50 ft. 30/90 ft -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - -Rear yard 0 ft.121 135 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting - - a public or private street. Maximum Height 75 ft. 33 ft. Maximum Site Coverage 85% 85% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 15% [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. The site is zoned I-L. Because the proposal is only to add additional parking for an existing building, many of the development standards are not affected. The exceptions are maximum site coverage and minimum landscape requirements. As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with these 0 percentages. Details are presented by the applicant on the Site Plan (G1. ). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been fully satisfied. C. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access,Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided a site plan showing existing access from SW Hunziker Road. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to estabhsh the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. There is an existing joint access used by the applicant,which is partially located on the flag portion of the adjacent site. A copy of the title report was provided by the applicant showing the 25-foot roadway easement granted to the subject property. This standard is met. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2o11-(x)002/I'IGARD DISIRIBUTION CENTER PAGE.6 OF 23 The current access to be maintained is to Hunziker Road, a public street. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi- building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; A new on-site pedestrian walkway is proposed from the building entrance to the parking area and public sidewalk on Hunziker Road. This standard is met. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; A walkway that crosses a vehicle access drives is proposed from the building to Hunziker Road. The proposed walkway is 3 feet wide, approximately 40 feet long across the drive aisle, and marked with striping. This does not meet the standard which requires a minimum of 4 feet and no greater than 36 feet in length if pavement markings are used in lieu of separations. A condition of approval will ensure this standard is satisfied. FINDING: The walkway requirements are not satisfied as proposed, but can be met as conditioned below. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced pubhc use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans indicate the walkways will be concrete with the exception of the walkway crossing the parking lot. This portion of the walkway will be asphalt with adequate striping to identify the walkway location. New light poles will be installed in the parking areas to illuminate pedestrian ways. This standard has been met. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The preliminary sight distance certification submitted is satisfactory. This standard is met with the preliminary sight distance certification submittal. A final sight distance certification shall be submitted after construction of the site improvements. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/"ITGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 7 OF 23 Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The existing driveway will not be modified or affected. This section is not applicable. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.I provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. One access point is required for this project,which has over 100 parking spaces. One 55-foot paved access drive is provided to Hunziker Road. Vehicular access ways are within 40 feet of the primary ground floor entrance;therefore this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the access egress and circulation requirements have not been fully met,but can be as conditioned below. CONDITION: Prior to issuance of site/building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval that shows a walkway crossing a vehicular way that is a minimum of 4 feet wide and no longer than 36 feet. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (18.725): Noise: For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible emissions: Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack of other point- source emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28- 070) apply. Vibration: No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors: The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat: No direct or sky-reflected glare,whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted and; there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or constructing equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents: All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. The site is developed with two industrial buildings which house a mix of industrial tenant uses. This proposal is only to expand the existing parking lots, and does not include a change of use. Therefore, these Environmental Performance Standards do not apply. NOTICE TYPE H DECISION SDR2011-001102/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 8 OF 23 FINDING: Based on the above, there is no evidence that the Environmental Performance Standards will not be met. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING (18.745): All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock (ANSI Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions). Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the most recent edition of the American Institute of Architects'Architectural Graphic Standards. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. Certificate of Occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small,medium or large). The site fronts Hunziker Road. The City Arborist notes that the minimum street tree spacing has not been satisfied with the species that is proposed. The applicant has been conditioned to provide a revised plan to ensure this standard is met. FINDING: The spacing standard for street trees is not satisfied, but can be met as conditioned below. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. The site is surrounded by similar industrial uses and the proposal is only to add parking. No buffering is required for this development. Special Provision: Screening and Landscaping of Parking Areas Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. An evergreen hedge is proposed along Hunziker Road to screen the parking area from view. A mix of trees, shrubs and groundcover in landscape areas are proposed to achieve a balance between low lying and vertical landscaping. Berms or fences are not proposed. Landscape islands are all at least six feet wide. The City Arborist noted that the parking lot trees do not meet the distribution requirement of one (1) tree for each seven (7) spaces; therefore,this standard has not been met. The applicant is being conditioned to ensure the parking lot tree requirements are satisfied. FINDING: The screening and landscaping of parking areas standard is not fully met but can be met as conditioned below. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-(N1 002/11GARD DISI'RIBUDON CENTER PAGE 9 OF 23 Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant indicates the refuse collection area will be enclosed by 6-foot chain link with slat fences and a gate. The enclosures will house both garbage and recycling. This criterion is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. CONDITIONS: ♦ The applicant shall provide additional street trees along the eastern and western portion of the street frontage to meet the spacing requirements in section 18.745.040.C. ♦ The applicant shall provide additional parking lot trees within the front, middle, and back parking lots to meet the "one tree for every seven parking spaces" standard in section 18.745.050.E. MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on- site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant is proposing to meet the Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off method of compliance. Based on the use a minimum of 720 square feet of storage area would be required to meet the minimum standards. This amount of storage cannot be provided by the applicant. The applicant has provided an approval letter from Pride Disposal. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropnately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. Recyclable storage will be co-located with the solid waste storage. The exterior collection bins will have lids to comply with IBC and IFC codes. The enclosures will be located in two areas adjacent to the loading docks and not within setbacks or parking areas for easier garbage hauler pick-up. Screening which meets City standards has been proposed. The location has been reviewed and approved by the service provider,Pride Disposal. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR201I-00002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 10 OF 23 Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The plans indicate that the storage area will have a 20-foot-wide gate opening (G5.0 — Site Details). Screening is provided by a chain link fence and secured gate with slats. Access standards. Access to storage areas can be limited for security reasons. However, the storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service; Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered; Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. If only a single access point is available to the storage area, adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. The proposed garbage enclosures are located adjacent to the loading docks for easy tenant access. These loading areas are designed for large trucks and provide adequate maneuvering space for garbage hauler pick-up. The enclosures are not located near a public street. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage standards are met. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces;4) Long-term spaces. According to measurements taken from the plans, the parking associated with this project is within 20 feet of the building. All parking has been proposed to be located on-site. Three additional handicap accessible spaces are being proposed near the primary entrance. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint Parking_ Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. The development has no shared parking. This standard does not apply. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR201I-00002/TIGARD DISIRIBUI'ION CENTER PAGE 11 OF 23 Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1-3 above. The proposed building is not a mixed-use project. This standard is not applicable. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized,signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is required to provide a minimum of five ADA parking spaces. There are two existing spaces and three more are proposed. Final determination of the number and design of the required ADA spaces will be made by the building official during the review of the building permit application. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off- street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795,Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvenng within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation). No drop-off grade separation is proposed. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces clearly marked with striping, and the direction of flow is clear since there is only one access to the site. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-(XX102/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 12 OF 23 The applicant states that the parking lot has been designed to accommodate stalls that do not require wheel stops. The spaces have been designed with a 3-foot overhang beyond the face of the curb. These overhang areas are designed with a wider sidewalk or low lying landscaping that does not count toward the minimum 15% landscape area requirement. The applicant notes that there are a few locations where the overhang could not be accommodated (along the east side of the building near the main entrance). The applicant states that wheel stops are proposed for this area. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. Stall width dimensions may be distributed as 50% standard spaces,50% compact spaces. All compact spaces shall be labeled as such. The applicant's plans indicate that of the 156 parking stalls, none are compact. Dimensions of the 90 degree parking spaces are 9 ft. by 18.5 ft. for standard stalls. The drive aisles are two-way and a width of 26 feet minimum. This standard is met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Bicycle parking is provided within 50 feet of entrances to both buildings. It is visible from on-site and Hunziker Road. The designated bike parking areas will not be within parking aisles or pedestrian ways. This criterion is satisfied. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long- term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The site plan shows the location of the bicycle parking. The plan shows that the parking will be steel loop racks, secured to the ground. The surface will be concrete. All spaces are uncovered and designed to meet the 2.5 feet x 6 feet requirements (per site plan). This criterion is satisfied. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for industrial uses is 0.1 spaces per 1,000 feet of floor area. Twelve spaces are required. The site plan shows two parking areas with 12 spaces provided. The minimum requirement is satisfied. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/TIIGARD DI.SIRIBUtION CENTER PAGE 13 OF 23 Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. The minimum off-street parking requirement for the development is 132 spaces based on the existing uses of manufacturing,warehouse and office. A total of 156 spaces are proposed. There is no maximum for industrial uses; therefore a maximum does not apply in this case. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. This is an industrial development with existing off-street loading spaces. No additional square footage is proposed with this application;therefore no additional loading spaces are required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above the off-street parking and loading requirements are satisfied. TREE REMOVAL (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. A tree plan dated April 26, 2011(with an amendment dated May 9, 2011) by Overlook Tree Preservation has been provided by the applicant,and contains all of the required elements. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; The Arborist Report identified nine trees on site over six inch diameter (Tree 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14). Seven of these trees are over 12 inch diameter, and two are less than 12 inch diameter (Tree 10 and 11). 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. All seven trees over 12 inch diameter will be removed, so 100% of the 136 inches removed are required to be mitigated. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; This requirement has been met. All trees will be removed. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-(X)002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 14 OF 23 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This requirement is not applicable because all trees will be removed. 18.790.040 Incentives for Tree Retention B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. This requirement is not applicable because all trees will be removed. 18.790.050 Permit Applicability Section 18.790.050, tree removal permits are required only for the removal of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as defined by Chapter 18.775. The permit for removal of a tree shall be processed as a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using the following approval criteria: Removal of the tree must not have a measurable negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters or water quality as evidenced by an erosion control plan which precludes: a) deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or similar material exceeding 1/2 cubic foot in volume on public or private streets, adjacent property, or into the storm and surface water system, either by direct deposit, dropping, discharge or as a result of the action of erosion; b) evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soils; turbid or sediment-laden flows; or evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on bare soil slopes where the flow of water is not filtered or captured on site using the techniques of Chapter 5 of the Washington County Unified Sewerage Agency Environmental Protection and Erosion Control rules. Two of the trees proposed for removal are within Significant Habitat Areas,which are classified as sensitive lands. These two trees are on the north side of the building and not near the public street. Erosion control fencing is proposed at the boundary of the site to prevent deposits of mud and similar material onto the adjacent site. Storm drains will be protected with bags to filter water prior to entering the storm system. There is no evidence of concentrated flows over bare soils as a result of removing the two trees from the site. All bare areas will be bedded with straw or seeded to prevent erosion. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have not been fully met; however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: ♦ Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit a mitigation plan to the City Arborist for review and approval. The plan must have a signature of approval from the project arborist certifying that it meets the requirements of 18.790.060(D) and that the species and placement of mitigation trees has been reasonably calculated to provide for their growth to maturity. The mitigation proposal shall show the species, location, and spacing of mitigation trees in relation to buildings, infrastructure, existing trees on adjacent sites, street trees, and each other. ♦ Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a cash assurance (letter of credit or cash deposit) for the equivalent value of mitigation required (e.g. 136 caliper inches of proposed mitigation tree planting x $125/caliper inch). Any trees successfully planted on or off-site, in accordance with an approved Tree NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-0((X12/IIGARD DISIRIBUIION CENTER PAGE 15 OP 23 Mitigation Plan and TDC 18.790.060.D,will be credited against the assurance two years after all of the trees are planted. After the plan is approved and the trees are planted, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the City Arborist to certify that all of the mitigation trees were properly planted per the approved Tree Mitigation Plan in order to set the starting point of the two year tree establishment period. After the two year establishment period, the applicant shall provide a re-inventory of the mitigation trees conducted by a certified arborist in order to document mitigation tree survival, and compliance with the ap roved Tree Mitigation Plan. The remaining value of caliper inches not successfully mitigated shall be paid as a fee in-lieu of planting. Failure to plant and provide documentation of mitigation tree planting by the project arborist within 6 months of certificate of occupancy issuance shall result in the forfeiture of the cash assurance to the City's tree fund. VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant's narrative does not address the visual clearance requirements, however there are no structures proposed within the visual clearance areas. The code requires vision clearance to be met at driveways; therefore the applicant must continue to comply with this standard in the future. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3, 5, 6, 7 & 8 (residential developments and 100-year floodplain). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore,will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage);and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal. The buildings already exist on the site and no additions are proposed. Trees were reserved where possible and incorporated into the parking lot landscape islands. Tree mitigation is required for this development and discussed later in the decision. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage ppatterns, identified per Section 18.810.100.A.3. and the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas Map." Methods and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following: (1) Water quality facilities (for infiltration, retention, detention and/or treatment); (2) Pervious pavement; (3) Soil amendment; (4) Roof runoff controls; (5) Fencing to guide animals toward safe passageways; (6) Re-directed outdoor lighting to reduce spill-off into habitat areas; (7) Preservation of existing vegetative and canopy cover. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 16 OF 23 The applicant has considered innovative construction methods to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat The applicant's narrative shows that water quality will be handled with storm filter catch basins and the vegetative corridor for the off-site wetland is not being impacted by this proposal. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: (1) A deck, atio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A change in elevation or grade; (4)A change in the texture of the path material; (5) Sign;or (6) Landscaping. The applicant states that the new parking lots on the north and south side of the buildings are designed to provide a safer and more efficient environment for the employees and customers. There are a couple of patio areas with picnic tables proposed for employees. There is a sidewalk that leads only to the front entrance of building A and nowhere else on the site. The site is relatively flat and most portions are visible from the street. The proposal includes significant enhancement of the site landscaping which will better define public and private areas. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet,which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The elevation alteration includes additional windows on the south side of the building, which will increase visibility to the outdoors. The new parking areas will include light poles to illuminate areas used by pedestrians. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. There is an existing transit route on Hunziker Street approximately with a stop adjacent to the site. A request for comments was sent to Tri-met,but no comments were submitted. FINDING: Based on the analysis above the Site Development Review criteria have been satisfied. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS (18.810): Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 17 OF 23 Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030E and Figure 18.810.1 require a 5- lane arterial to have right-of-way varying from 100 feet to 104 feet, a 3-lane collector to have right-of- way varying from 70 to 74 feet,and a local street to have a 54-foot right-of-way. Other improvements required include sidewalks, bike lanes if designated as bike routes, underground utilities, street lighting,storm drainage,planter strips and street trees. Hunziker Street is a 3-lane collector street in the City's Transportation System Plan.The applicant is required to expand the existing right-of-way to 37 feet from centerline of right-of-way to accommodate the collector street cross-section required in an industrial zone.This calls for dedication of an additional 7 feet of right-of- way to the City of Tigard. Because the dedication is not roughly proportionate at this time, dedication is not required. However, the applicant has proposed the dedication and will comply with future development requirements. Street trees are required. Planting plan is subject to review and approval by the City arborist. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary hnes of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de- sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. There are no future streets or extensions of streets through this development. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. There are no future streets or extensions of streets through this development. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. No street extensions are proposed. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: ♦ Where street location is precluded by natural topography,wetlands or other bodies of water or,pre-existing development or; NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR201140)002/TIGARD DIS1RIBW1ON CENTER PAGE 18 OF 23 • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets,limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. No new streets are proposed. The existing block size is roughly 1,500 feet,under the 2,000-foot maximum. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. No new parcels are being created with this project. These standards do not apply. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The proposed development is not significant enough to require construction of street improvements along the property frontage. Sufficient right-of-way will be dedicated to accommodate future street widening (including planters and sidewalk) along the frontage. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The building is already served by sanitary sewer.There is no requirement for any off-site sewer work. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Storm water detention and water quality treatment are required. The applicant proposes to install water quality treatment and detention facilities to accommodate the additional storm water runoff generated by additional impervious surface and to address the storm water currently being treated by an existing water quality swale to be removed as part of the project. Detention will be provided via StormTech underground chamber control systems and water quality will be addressed with Contech water quality treatment facilities. This standard is met. NOTICE'I YPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 19 OF 23 After the water quality treatment and detention facilities are completed, the applicant and the City shall enter into an agreement for long-term maintenance of the facilities. This agreement will he recorded and the City will inspect the facilities periodically to ensure compliance with the terms of the agreement. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways,bike lanes,or pedestrian pathways are required as part of this project due to the type and scope of the proposal. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction,high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: ♦ The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; ♦ The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer,shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and ♦ Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common,but not the only,such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines on Hunziker Street along the property frontage. In addition, there are overhead utility lines along the west roperty line serving the property and other facilities beyond the applicant's lot. A review of the feasibility of undergrounding the overhead lines indicates that undergrounding is not feasible in either corridor.Fee-in-lieu of undergrounding shall be paid. The total lineal footage for all power lines adjacent to the site is approximately 850 lineal feet. About 320 lineal feet is along the street frontage. The remainder of 530 lineal feet is on the north-south power line. Based on $35 per lineal foot, the fees would be $11,200.00 and$18,550 respectively. The total fee would be: $29,750.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: No change in building use or expansion of the existing building proposed. No traffic impact study will be required for this project. Fire and Life Safety: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) is the service provider for fire and emergency services. The applicant must work with TVF&R to ensure the project complies with all TVF&R regulations. Public Water System: The City of Tigard is the water service provider in this area. The property already has existing water service. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 20 Or 23 Public Water System: The City of Tigard is the water service provider in this area. The property already has existing water service. There are no water-related improvements proposed in the project. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for periodic maintenance of the water quality facility as needed. That agreement will be recorded and City will monitor its implementation. (For Private Facilities) To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. (For privately maintained Stormwater Management Units) he proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Storm water quality treatment is required. The applicant proposes to install four new catch basins on site to capture and convey storm water to a new water quality vault to be constructed on site. The preliminary storm water treatment calculations indicate that two filters will be sufficient to treat the storm water entering the vault. The applicant's proposed treatment method once constructed will meet this requirement. However, the applicant must submit water quality calculations and proposed treatment facilities for city review and approval prior to issuance of a Public Facility Improvement(PFI) permit for those facilities. A preliminary water quality facility maintenance plan is required as part of the submittal for a PFI permit. That plan shall include a contract with a firm qualified to maintain the water quality facility in accordance with the manufacturer's maintenance recommendations. The construction of the facility shall be monitored by a professional engineer.After construction,that engineer shall provide written certification that the facility has been constructed in accordance with the approved plans. The final long-term maintenance plan shall be prepared after the facility is constructed. After completion of the water quality facility, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for future maintenance of the facility. The long-term maintenance plan will be incorporated into this agreement. The agreement will be recorded and the City will be inspecting the facility periodically to ensure compliance with the terms of the agreement. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over one acre, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This requires a 1200C permit application and needs to be approved before any site work begins on the project. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 21 OF 23 Because the project will not be disturbing over 1 acre of area, a 1200CN permit is not required. A full set of improvement plans,including erosion control measures, shall be submitted to the City on 24-inch by 36-inch (or 22 X 34) sheets for review, approval and issuance of a storm water connection permit from Clean Water Services. Clean Water Services will be inspecting the erosion control measures for compliance with the approved plan. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.). A City PFI permit for the water quality and detention facilities and for any vegetated corridor work is required before any work begins on the site. Survey Requirements: Applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins,water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390): Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has submitted an Impact analysis that identifies the impact this development has on the infrastructure. The applicant's plans propose improvements or upgrades as needed to not have any adverse impact on the City infrastructure. No street improvements or dedications are required, however the Design Review Engineer has indicated that the applicant has proposed a dedication to meet current right-of-way requirements. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Urban Forester and Design Review Engineer reviewed the proposal. Their comments have been inserted into the decision. City of Tigard Public Works Department was sent a copy of the proposal. There were no comments on the proposal but will update records to note the updated storm system and water quality manhole. Tigard Police reviewed the application and indicated no objections. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services noted that a Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained. Review by the city's Development Services Engineering Division will insure this permit is obtained. Frontier Communications Northwest commented that there are indications of facilities being moved so the developer needs to contact Frontier to develop plans. STAFF RESPONSE: This information was passed along to the applicant's representative at VLMK, Bill Lambert. Bill indicated he would contact Frontier to work out issues. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-(X)002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 22 OIL 23 SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 22,2011 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 6, 2011 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Areal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for urposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040..1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. Of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 5,2011. uestions: If you have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon at (503) 639-4171. Q . July 21,2011 PREPARED Y: Cheryl Caines DAL E Associate Planner / July 21,2011 APPR•VED BY: Ron Bunch DATE Community Development Director NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-(0N)02/11GARIJ DISI'RIBUI'ION CI NIT?R PAGE 23 OF 23 �, ; \ 0 �,. . _a..` �� VICINITY MAP 1H I a �� � �,"1 SDR2011-00002 It' _ ;.* \ r TRE2011-00010 TRE2011-00014 10>:,...---:-:.. >.�rrrr TIGARD DISTRIBUTION � �='. .�. �a•,I:u Masi \` , • j-iiii y rijr___ CENTER . IN rovia.4 .4.4499 4, .. • �_ subject site NI EN Ail. 11 j i. taut ' "Vir :1 t: / GI -v,. PILIMIll I 1 1 ..- fig 61111111 pm1111 oo,".,r . 4,4'4 . .\\IN...IIII lalaaizc l,pi t•f...a,r.....s,._ .._ si /11: 41°1114.: 4 , rr: c.:. ..,... ... ..,,,_ _ ,. 4'► JI FNh9T�� .. . .. ♦ r 11111 I :t - _ �.,� i N+_, Information on this map 1s for general location 1 ... only and should be verified with the ›- Development Services Division. t �.,'� IA Approx.Scale 1:6,000-1 In=667 h ` .� Map printed at 04:59 PM on 14-Jun-11., # .. • 11101 ilkiiiii.i_1,• � '•; 1,• DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD • �� MAKES NO WARRANTY REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT,ACCURACY.TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME E IY NO �� ��� � I LIABILITO FOA ANY EROVI E, REGARDLESS SS OR F HOW USE IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. �1 _ADD City of Tigard Feet ■■i����� � TIGAR 4 PS 13954 SW Hall 4917Bl3d 0 10 00 '•ti nl 503 639-4171 il OWN www.tigard-or gov • .-.- ------1 !i CITY OF TIGARD • S_1(_i7. P(. • Approved I X 1 i . Conditionally Approved • For only the work as described Q. �► PERMIT NC). $ R 1 See Letter to: Fellow I r 9 Attach d� 7..-‘,....I j/ / .+O ..« %. rnaa xrwc - f ! /11 • ` 0 Q'°r j: 1 f + n /�. 0000 •i.j••• j.'�i// •:/ •.•/.j �:7 J/j/, /.%/;''/•••/ ;i'/i./i` 7,r ;j.f%- _ (1 • i( pE}i '�ti� / . . — .. v- �i r .c- ' $ !....1 te( ". r' /. :r+/ /..".',--H� .orRO M •: i._ ; I I i >_,11, .. �`: J f o �' / ._ 1,.......ft.. . ........../ • . ....‘.......'4„,7r lf f ;!,■, A • of 1 t _ - — _ o ° le: ;,�1 . .,'"�•u n.:..'.�, -,,,,',„.C',./;,e,9 F y" 1� 1 .. r.•' ? i ' • 7-_-'$ EMI i.,°— .. Oil •.. ..r- w Lill: '�t 111'1.- ,; .y /:, , S _ 'to as %, r ,10..- ? to~ a o 111.__ — t =..= o� iK(1� . 0 --,. .� .�• ,.. s- �J�7 t, k0t , — i '� __—,__ a .t'\ t14. 1 7R1�1u11�11.,1'� -4• , Lya• __.—... -__.__ ...f.: .... LI� ... f ..... .. * =� r1 4l,`t\1�1 V t t•'�`�1,�1 .1aV •7_....i --_ -- _. ..- �+nn _ - _ , �........ F: .r _T JW .1?" .1?'' `N!'1, 1;.,t ;V't:?� 1 ,w� '1PL11 i!'?.�,lN?\6\i�i�ILwiYc-55-�l'1!w t •/i I 04 1 /�l i'.1.. LcfW4 M.10.0 4r / s1II n■r.[�Rl••• r .1 alt •G a •—._. ____ I.rr " FNYR4 M7180.S n-„- ' gr. •s•.ur SITE Pi MINING SYYB01 S O . �° R i � ....1.o-1 t—.1.....w.r ti— O^... 5 <.r.,w r nw . ..ow 4•1 s 111111111.411!...........T.• A '�a .. .rw.�n w . +R Q.ya�•..• •", © •••••••••••••.s.-..1 W W Q hiW.CNO Z[Y. .••••• 4. ••••g rr..•. rrnrl p O A �..�1.—® r".rr 08-) J ___. ---a,. M-Ii§ a• _,.,4 r 2. ., � PoQ (/1°: ...J „........ .o.... �.. r 044 OA 14•1 ,. ..� N._. r ..�_•r� ....Es ,.._� _ ....a W Ow 10/40 S°1, S.r r(../ii NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2011-00002 TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER TIGARD 120 DAYS = 10/6/2011 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2011-00002 Tree Removal Permit(TRE) TRE2011-00010 Tree Removal Permit(TRE) TRE2011-00014 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two existing, multi-tenant, industrial buildings. In addition the applicant is requesting removal of two trees within lightly limit significant habitat area. There is a wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area, but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. APPLICANT: VLMK Consulting Engineers OWNER: Tigard Distribution Center LLC Jennifer Kimura c/o Deering Management Group 3993 SW Kelly Ave. 4800 SW Macadam Ave, Suite 120 Portland, OR 97239 Portland, OR 97239 LOCATION: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Rd.;WCTM 2S101BD,Tax Lot 200. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few,if any,nuisance characteristics such as noise,glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 22, 2011 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 6, 2011 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A.. ... The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 5, 2011. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Cheryl Caines. Associate Planner at (503) 718-2437, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. A ,, — i - 19�S VICINITY MAP >t om✓ ,G197 i� -- 1 _1__„-.1� ... fix' rill:.X -.,yt: •t ('t ( --_I SDR2011•00002 •,.c'' •\ f+� ._i „ - !t TRE2011-00010 �,,,.1 •,, i 1 -1 TRE2011-00010 •,1-\\„.•••‘- ‘..., 1 1 ' d— $,,-.. TIGARD DISTRIBUTION ,r. ''.. .- '�� ��\-A II •N �X - I_._ CENTER S -. i ,rte.;..-i \ t' �\ . rr f \ I• ' j t E-- Subject Site ,INNS , —1 r—lj f-- ,/ e ,. hY3Yr 1\ I \ \' 1 t -sas1�c='um� ,E...r.i;rz ' \ /`„': a air?�a x i.,< 1 CITY OF TGARD _'_ne.. I ...nail,Apps I x 1 Only tno wc•x as Carib..- in: / 1' maw r10. Spat i.�I1 00004. I See Warr lx Fellow I I /- y i i� r 0000 ...– /,r "Y . ,.1 -. ..- f '.,:� l.. i -7- , 1 _� i• -- .-F--', I _g�• j - � /s+ W" `1 arm.'' ir .1,44.: 1 -••rams �_ - #i� it.. j ';,R,-"*.?: Ate _ Mg it:. at_, t . `�a I ft. 111/ !■ 1 �s r n N i, q*,......,,,,l% g I: =. _— _— . -- -_ - `� ,c. e—i �= _ of•�..� ... . _. __ r_.�� a NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,TT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING • LAND USE APPLICATION • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW I ( , \ p DATE OF NOTICE: June 15,2011 FILE NUMBERS: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2011-00002 (Type II Land Use Application) TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2011-00010 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2011-00014 FILE NAME: TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER APPLICANT: VLMK Consulting Engineers OWNER: Tigard Distribution Center LLC Jennifer Kimura c/o Deering Management Group 3993 SW Kelly Avenue 4800 SW Macadam Avenue,Suite 120 Portland,OR 97239 Portland,OR 97239 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two existing, multi-tenant,industrial buildings. In addition the applicant is requesting removal of two trees within lightly limited significant habitat area. There is a wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area,but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. LOCATION: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road;Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S101BD,Tax Lot 200. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise,glare,odor,and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 29,2011. All comments should be directed to Cheryl Gaines,Associate Planner(503.718.2437)in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at 503.639.4171 or by e-mail to cherylcna,tigard-or.gov. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JULY 14, 2011. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE MAILED A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRIF1'EN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AN"1'ER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMI'TED WRI I I EN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site;all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application,written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. If you want to inspect the file, please call and make an appointment with either the project planner or the planning technicians. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of$.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." ;. .... .,... — i.4 worm MAP„,,,.., ....„,.....:1L EOM it ■I. � non 0 - \s, ... � 1 i000u! � , . ��1 ilk \\ ■ I w� llP: M. r . \ 1 sonar Site f r : ■ i riii�rr� d li 1 V �r ,►,w`i,._ r. �� % • ` ViWilliall�f/1111 Mil” Mme`"�1', =`, \ / ' I\ iff untik, _I k\\.\.c,\>)/\ / I i "7' SEM \N`� l 1\ wily' ' t AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE �-- OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL TIGARD IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: SDR2011-00002/TRE2011-00010/TRE2011-00014 Land Use File Name: TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER I, Cheryl Gaines, Associate Planner for the City of Tigard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) S o y - Soo 5 S(,J ff /ce�r t2 d • and did personally post notice of the proposed land use application(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 17-1" day of .2011. o Signature of Person Who Performed Posting h:\login\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for applicant to post public hearingdoc -TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER- SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2011-00002/ TREE REMOVAL (TRE) 2011-00010 & 2011-00014 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two existing, multi-tenant, industrial buildings. In addition the applicant is requesting removal of two trees within lightly limited significant habitat area There is a wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area, but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. LOCATION: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S101BD, Tax Lot 200. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503- 639-4171 or by email to cherylc@tigard-or.gov. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS f. III ■ al CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TIGARD DA l'E: June 15,2011 TO: Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2437 Fax: (503) 718-2788 E-Mail: Cherylc @tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2011-00002/ TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2011-00010 & 2011-00014 - TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two existing, multi- tenant, industrial buildings. In addition the applicant is requesting removal of two trees within lightly limited significant habitat area. There is a wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area, but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. LOCATION: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S101BD, Tax Lot 200. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few,if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY JUNE 29,2011. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. — — Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting. 3.444 1.151.1 71 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TIGARD DATE: June 15,2011 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2437 Fax: (503) 718-2788 E-Mail: Cherylc @tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2011-00002/ TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2011-00010 & 2011-00014 - TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two existing, multi- tenant, industrial buildings. In addition the applicant is requesting removal of two trees within lightly limited significant habitat area. There is a wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area, but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. LOCATION: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S101BD, Tax Lot 200. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few,if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY JUNE 29,2011. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. — Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: — Name&Number of Person Commenting. 'a CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR L. .ENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: S N1R 01011 - O D 00- . FILE NAME: -Ti q a r c- n i c4 . ( eA4 / Cm OFFICES 1 _C.D.ADMINISTRATION/Ron Bunch,CD Director X DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Todd Prager,Assoc.Planner/Arborist _PUBLIC WORKS/Ted Kyle,City Engineer _C.D.ADMINISTRATION/Susan Hartnett,Asst.CD Director ?Z BUILDING DIVISION/Mark VanDomelen,Building Official _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets) _CITY ADMINISTRATIOWCathy Wheatley,City Recorder L(POLICE DEPARTMENT/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer PLANNING COMMISSION(+12 sets) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Planning-Engineering Techs. .2C.PUBLIC WORKS/Brian Rager,Assistant PW Director X FILE/REFERENCE(+2 sets) X DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Gus Duenas,Development Eng _PUBLIC WORKS/Steve Martin,Parks Manager SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*A TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* ZC CLEAN WATER SERVICES* Planning Manager North Division Administrative Office Development Services Department 15707 SW Walker Road Drew DeBois,Deputy Fire Marshall II/CFI 1850 SW 170th Avenue David Schweitzer/SWM Program 9. Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97006 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Beaverton,OR 97005-1152 Hillsboro,OR 97123 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager Elizabeth Ruther,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood (wLUN Fort Required) _ Steven Sparks,Dev.Svcs Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM 1R 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd._ Joanna Mensher,Data Resource Center(ZCA-Adopted) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97224 — Paulette Copperstone,(ZCA-RFC Only) _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris(Maps&CWS Letter Only) _ 0.Gerald Uba, Ph.D.,(cPAIDCarzoN) Mara Ulloa(comp.Plan Amendments&Measure 37) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY * 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedtnes in Area) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 _Naomi Vogel-Beattie(General Apt Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Brent Curtis(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Assessment&Taxation(ZCA)MS 9 _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Development Review Coordinator _Dona Mateja,cartography(ZCA)MS 14 Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) 1900 SW 4th Avenue, Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _OR.PARKS&REC.DEPT. _WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A#t _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC Dave Austin(wcccA)"911"IA>onopot.Tow.nl Chad Gordon,Assistant District Manager (Notrty if ODOT R/R-Hwy Crossing Is Only Access to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,Sr Crossing Safety Specialist (Notify if Property Has HD Overlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13th Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner St. NE,Suite C Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES —PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington NortherriSanta Fe R/R Predecessor) Bruce Carswell,President&General Manager 200 Hawthorne Avenue SE,Suite C320 Salem,OR 97301-5294 111 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS eCOMCAST CABLE CORP. X TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C. Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations only) Gerald Backhaus is..M.pe,Ar..cow, (If Protect is Witinn%Mae of a Transa Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place, S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 i( PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC X NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY VERIZON X QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Mike Hieb Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. John Cousineau,OSP Network Lynn Smith,Eng.ROW Mgr. 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd. 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 X COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jennifer Garland,Demographics Alex Silantiev(s..Map n'Area Contact) Brian Every iom.e.in.wN.wawq 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h\padyvnaslers\Request For Comments Notification List doc (UPDATED' 22-Feb-11) (Also update.i\curpin\setup\labels\annexations\annexation_ullhties and franchises.doc,mailing labels&auto text when updating this document) Cheryl Caines From: john.cousineau @ftr.com Sent: Thursday,June 16, 2011 3:25 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: Site Development Review 2011-00002 There are indications of facilities being moved so the developer needs to contact Frontier so plans can be drawn up. John R. Cousineau Frontier Communications Northwest Inc. OSP Network Designer Phone 503-643-0371 Fax 503-643-0977 I Can Help You! This communication is confidential. Frontier only sends and receives email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.frontier.com/email disclaimer 1 ti • 1;1 CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 15,2011 TO: Todd Prager,Associate Planner/Arborist j�� FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2437 Fax: (503) 718-2788 E-Mail: Cherylc @tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2011-00002/ TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2011-00010 & 2011-00014 - TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two existing, multi- tenant, industrial buildings. In addition the applicant is requesting removal of two trees within lightly limited significant habitat area. There is a wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area,but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. LOCATION: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S101BD, Tax Lot 200. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few,if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY JUNE 29,2011. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting. —i";iJ Nirr SO1- 7l 3- )7Uv . _. !piii City of Tigard • T I G A R D Memorandum To: Cheryl Gaines From: Todd Prager Re: Tigard Distribution Center Parking Date: June 23, 2011 As you requested I have provided comments on the "Tigard Distribution Center Parking" project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding my comments please contact me anytime. 18.745.040, Street Trees It appears there is space for additional street trees along the eastern and western portion of the street frontage. 18.745.050, Buffering and Screening B. Buffering and screening requirements. The requirements of Table 18.745.1 do not appear to be applicable to this project. E. Screening:special provisions. 1. Screening and landscaping ofparking and loading areas: a. Screening ofparldng and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: (1) Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; (2) Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off- street parking areas from the public right-of-way; (3) Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; (4) Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect;and (5) The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. There are several locations where parking lot trees (Imperial Honeylocust) do not meet the "one tree for every seven parking spaces" standard. Spacing of parking lot trees within the front, middle, and back parking lots needs to be modified so there is at least one parking lot tree for every seventh parking space. 18.790.030, Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review,planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. A tree plan dated April 26, 2011(with an amendment dated May 9, 2011) by Overlook Tree Preservation has been provided by the applicant, and contains all of the required elements. B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; There are nine trees on site over six inch diameter (Tree 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14). Seven of these trees are over 12 inch diameter, and two are less than 12 inch diameter (Tree 10 and 11). 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. All seven trees over 12 inch diameter will be removed, so 100% of the 136 inches removed are required to be mitigated. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; This requirement has been met. All trees will be removed. 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This requirement is not applicable because all trees will be removed. B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. This requirement is not applicable because all trees will be removed. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Street Trees The applicant shall provide additional street trees along the eastern and western portion of the street frontage to meet the spacing requirements in section 18.745.040.C. Parking Lot Trees The applicant shall provide additional parking lot trees within the front,middle, and back parking lots to meet the "one tree for every seven parking spaces" standard in section 18.745.050.E. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: June 22, 2011 TO: Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner Q�,,,� FROM: Gus Duenas, Development Engineer i°" RE: SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The preliminary sight distance certification submitted is satisfactory. This standard is met with the preliminary sight distance certification submittal. A final sight distance certification shall be submitted after construction of the site improvements. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. N/A Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The existing driveway will not be modified or affected. This section is not applicable. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 1 Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030E and Figure 18.810.2 require a 3-lane collector to have right-of-way varying from 70 feet to 74 feet. Other improvements required include sidewalks, bike lanes, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, planter strips and street trees. Hunziker Street is a 3-lane collector street in the City's Transportation System Plan. The applicant is required to expand the existing right-of-way to 37 feet from centerline of right- of-way to accommodate the collector street cross-section required in an industrial zone. This calls for dedication of an additional 7 feet of right-of-way to the City of Tigard. Street trees are required. Planting plan is subject to review and approval by the City arborist. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. There are no future streets or extensions of streets through this development. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 2 Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. N/A Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.L states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: • All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer; and • The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured from the centerline intersection point of the two streets to the radius point of the bulb, and • If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City. N/A Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 3 N/A Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a non-access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments. N/A Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 4 Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. N/A Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. N/A Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The proposed development is not significant enough to require construction of street improvements along the property frontage. Sufficient right-of-way will be dedicated to accommodate future street widening (including planters and sidewalk) along the frontage. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 5 • The building is already served by sanitary sewer. There is no requirement for any off-site sewer work. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Storm water detention and water quality treatment are required. The applicant proposes to install water quality treatment and detention facilities to accommodate the additional storm water runoff generated by additional impervious surface and to address the storm water currently being treated by an existing water quality swale to be removed as part of the project. Detention will be provided via StormTech underground chamber control systems and water quality will be addressed with Contech water quality treatment facilities. This standard is met. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 6 After the water quality treatment and detention facilities are completed, the applicant and the City shall enter into an agreement for long-term maintenance of the facilities. This agreement will be recorded and the City will inspect the facilities periodically to ensure compliance with the terms of the agreement. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways, bike lanes, or pedestrian pathways are required as part of this project. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 7 • right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines on Hunziker Street along the property frontage. In addition, there are overhead utility lines along the west property line serving the property and other facilities beyond the applicant's lot. A review of the feasibility of undergrounding the overhead lines indicates that undergrounding is not feasible in either corridor. Fee-in-lieu of undergrounding shall be paid. The total lineal footage for all power lines adjacent to the site is approximately 850 lineal feet. About 320 lineal feet is along the street frontage. The remainder of 530 lineal feet is on the north-south power line. Based on$35 per lineal foot,the fees would be $11,200.00 and $18,550 respectively. The total fee would be: $29,750.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: No change in building use or expansion of the existing building proposed. No traffic impact study will be required for this project. Fire and Life Safety: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) is the service provider for fire and emergency services. Comments from TVF&R need to be incorporated into the project. Public Water System: The City of Tigard is the water service provider in this area. The property already has existing water service.There are no water-related improvements proposed in the project. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. (For Private Facilities) ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 8 • To ensure compliance with CWS design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. (For privately maintained Stormwater Management Units) The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Storm water quality treatment is required. The applicant proposes to install four new catch basins on site to capture and convey storm water to a new water quality vault to be constructed on site. The preliminary storm water treatment calculations indicate that two filters will be sufficient to treat the storm water entering the vault.The applicant's proposed treatment method once constructed will meet this requirement. However,the applicant must submit water quality calculations and proposed treatment facilities for city review and approval prior to issuance of a Public Facility Improvement(PFI) permit for those facilities. A preliminary water quality facility maintenance plan is required as part of the submittal for a PFI permit.That plan shall include a contract with a firm qualified to maintain the water quality facility in accordance with the manufacturer's maintenance recommendations.The construction of the facility shall be monitored by a professional engineer. After construction, that engineer shall provide written certification that the facility has been constructed in accordance with the approved plans. The final long-term maintenance plan shall be prepared after the facility is constructed. After completion of the water quality facility, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for future maintenance of the facility. The long-term maintenance plan will be incorporated into this agreement. The agreement will be recorded and the City will be inspecting the facility periodically to ensure compliance with the terms of the agreement. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 9 • erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. (Grading plan for subdivisions) A final grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours. The plan shall detail the provisions for surface drainage of all lots, and show that they will be graded to insure that surface drainage is directed to the street or a public storm drainage system approved by the Engineering Department. For situations where the back portions of lots drain away from a street and toward adjacent lots, appropriate private storm drainage lines shall be provided to sufficiently contain and convey runoff from each lot. The applicant will also be required to provide a geotechnical report, per Appendix Chapter 33 of the UBC, for the proposed grading slope construction. The recommendations of the report will need to be incorporated into the final grading plan and a final construction supervision report must be filed with the Engineering Department prior to issuance of building permits. The design engineer shall also indicate, on the grading plan, which lots will have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that will have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections and/or permits will be necessary when the lots develop. Because the project will not be disturbing over 1 acre of area, a 1200CN permit is not required. A full set of improvement plans, including erosion control measures, shall be submitted to the City on 24-inch by 36-inch (or 22 X 34) sheets for review, approval and issuance of a storm water connection permit from Clean Water Services. Clean Water Services will be inspecting the erosion control measures for compliance with the approved plan. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on- site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.). A City PFI permit for the water quality and detention facilities and for any vegetated corridor work is required before any work begins on the site. Address Assignments: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 10 • The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard. An addressing fee in the amount of$50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. N/A Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Development Engineer (Gus Duenas, 503-718-2470) for review and approval: • Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit must be acquired. The PFI permit typically covers half-street improvements, sanitary sewer installation, easement restoration and any other work in the public right-of-way or easements. The PFI also includes any work for on-site storm water detention, on-site water quality treatment, and any vegetated corridor work required by Clean Water Services. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans stamped by a professional engineer shall be submitted for review to the Development Engineer. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). • The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Development Engineer will delay processing of project documents. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 11 • Prior to issuance of the PFI permit, the applicant shall dedicate 7 feet along the property frontage on Hunziker Street to widen the existing right-of-way to 37 feet from centerline of right-of-way. • The PFI permit will cover all water quality treatment work on the site. The applicant shall provide on-site water quality treatment facilities as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Development Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. • The PFI permit will also cover all storm water detention facilities on the site. The applicant shall provide on-site detention facilities in accordance with the approved plans. The applicant shall provide on-site detention calculations as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20) and ODOT. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Development Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of the PFI permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan for long-term maintenance of the facilities shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. • An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the PFI permit drawings. The plan shall conform to Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20) Chapter 2. • The applicant shall comply with the conditions of the CWS (Clean Water Services) Service Provider Letter. All work to comply with the CWS conditions will be covered and inspected under the PFI permit. This includes review, inspection and approval of any work performed within the vegetated corridor. Easements required as part of this work shall be delineated and submitted for review and approval under the PFI permit review and approval process. • The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the construction phase THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS: • Prior to a final inspection, the applicant shall complete the required improvements covered under the PFI permit. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 12 . . • Prior to final inspection, easements required to meet CWS vegetated corridor requirements, reviewed and approved under the PFI permit process, shall be executed and recorded. • After water quality facilities have been installed, the applicant's engineer shall submit documentation to the Development Engineer certifying that the water quality facilities were constructed in accordance with the approved plans and comply with CWS standards. • After storm water detention facilities have been installed, the applicant's engineer shall submit documentation to the Development Engineer certifying that the detention facilities were constructed in accordance with the approved plans and comply with CWS standards. • After completion and certification of the water quality treatment and detention facilities, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City on City-furnished forms for long-term maintenance of the facilities. The agreement will be recorded and the City will be inspecting the facilities periodically for compliance with the terms of the agreement. • Prior to a final inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar,2) a disc of the as-builts in"DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates,referenced to NAD 83 (91). • The applicant shall pay the fee-in-lieu of undergrounding prior to City approval of the completed project improvements. • The applicant's engineer shall submit a final sight distance certification prior to City approval of the completed project improvements. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distribution Center PAGE 13 CleanWater Services RECEIVED MEMORANDUM JUN 2 8 2011 PLANNING TIGARD NGINEERING Date: June 24, 2011 To: Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner, City of Tigard From: Jackie Sue Humphreys, lean Water Services (the District) Subject: Tigard Distribution Center, SDR 2011-00002, 2S 101 BD00200 Please include the following comments when writing your conditions of approval: PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE SITE A Clean Water Services (the District) Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained. Application for the District's Permit Authorization must be in accordance with the requirements of the Design and Construction Standards, Resolution and Order No. 07-20, (or current R&O in effect at time of Engineering plan submittal), and is to include: a. Detailed plans prepared in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.04.2.b-1. b. Detailed grading and erosion control plan. An Erosion Control Permit will be required. Area of Disturbance must be clearly identified on submitted construction plans. If site area and any offsite improvements required for this development exceed one-acre of disturbance, project will require a 1200-CN Erosion Control Permit. If site area and any offsite improvements required for this development exceed five-acres of disturbance, project will require a 1200-C Erosion Control Permit. c. Detailed plans showing the development having direct access by gravity to public storm and sanitary sewer. d. Provisions for water quality in accordance with the requirements of the above named design standards. Water Quality is required for all new development and redevelopment areas per R&O 07-20, Section 4.05.5, Table 4-1. Access shall be provided for maintenance of facility per R&O 07-20, Section 4.02.4. e. If use of an existing, offsite or regional Water Quality Facility is proposed, it must be clearly identified on plans, showing its location, condition, capacity to treat this site and, any additional improvements and/or upgrades that may be needed to utilize that facility. 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax: (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org f. If private lot LIDA systems proposed, must comply with the current CWS Design and Construction Standards. A private maintenance agreement, for the proposed private lot LIDA systems, needs to be provided to the City for review and acceptance. g. Show all existing and proposed easements on plans. Any required storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water quality related easements must be granted to the City. h. Site contains a"Sensitive Area." Applicant shall comply with the conditions as set forth in the Service Provider Letter No. 09-000047, dated May 13, 2011. i. Developer may be required to preserve a corridor separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The corridor must not part of any buildable lot and, shall be subject to a"Storm Sewer, Surface Water, Drainage and Detention Easement over its entirety", or its equivalent. j. Clean Water Services shall require an easement over the Vegetated Corridor conveying storm and surface water management to Clean Water Services that would prevent the owner of the Vegetated Corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor and any easements therein. k. Detailed plans showing the sensitive area and corridor delineated, along with restoration and enhancement of the corridor. 1. Provide DSL and Corps of Engineers permits for any work in the wetlands or creek prior to any on site work, including grading and erosion control. Include permit number on cover sheet of plans or provide concurrence with the delineation. m. Any proposed offsite construction activities will require an update or amendment to the current Service Provider Letter for this project. CONCLUSION This Land Use Review does not constitute the District's approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance to the NPDES permit held by the District. The District,prior to issuance of any connection permits, must approve final construction plans and drainage calculations. Cheryl Caines From: Brian Rager Sent: Tuesday,June 28, 2011 3:05 PM To: Cheryl Caines Cc: Gus Duenas Subject: SDR 2011-00014,Tigard Dist Center Cheryl, No comments from PW on this one. i will make sure Brian Wheatley gets a heads up on their revamped storm system and water quality manhole. Thanks, Brian D. Rager Assistant Public Works Director Public Works Department Direct: 503-718-2471 E-mail: brianr( tigard-or.gov Public Works: Taking Care of Our Community DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules"City General Records Retention Schedule." 1 RECEIVED coy cYf T144-F-1) JUN 2 9 2011 Q Lq N N , )C Q I V t S I rJ CITY OF PLAIWNNG/ENGINEEIIING 13ia-s c, W, NRLL R3WD T c.4-C4) o iR.F.t orJ 91 1-1-.3 CM E.ityL CA I.) S p .Are_ whs . : Ac2E. 4 we-o ,0 4 - tE_ mop Lt s& A pow CAT.Qo SI Tt. DE-VW-of &IQ T RVI f 4-14 11 -0P00l. (o(t PgloPsz-TY `-o c ' oI -hho5 s..) N L TTtfz-vuK THE T iE 144jf_ 04p ettc.��j ra * 114- Q1LtgEWA) L 4 T l) 01,1 0:kR- FLAt, VT 131124U.4.1 -n.coo Di S T1 ego f bte-l'Y Y. Lv� w L0 A (' '( q44 1e- c N - t l C•tt FIT To 6E- 41-1. - 'fl w'E w( C-c&JT I dt•tE 'Z'o l-1 v G u 3 -' kr-e-f4f o,S-r40 oti.2 PPAI PITY T1 F-a+ti4N• TN E4 2`s - s0 w LD ' -,Icr_ A +J c&AnleRs14 sip/g.A -14A7 ►s s c r- P A -1'1A61 r" _ R4-046.04 N s ND f-(2-6E f-lt'Fr-+24t FRS -r-kA r N 0 s A Fee 1 &01Z A (,c1=45 0 IJ r_� • 1-TA AS F-hST" s t of Oq„J * STS t►J L, MAILING / NOTIFICATION RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIGARD I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Assistant for the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appxopnare Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE DECISION FOR: SDR2011-00002/TRE2011-00010/TRE2011-00014—TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (He No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof, on June 15,2011,and deposited in the United States Mail on June 15,2011,postage prepaid. j, • .11■4i/fe (Person that Prepared Notice) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the (9.6 day of L LI , 2011. OFFICIAL SEAL dAttij ,' SHIRLEY L TREAT NOTARY PUB C OF OREGO ) NOTARY PUBUC.OREGON �OMMISSION NO 459848 My Commission Expires: i l (4I LS- my ION EXPIRES JULY 06,2015 • NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER EXH I BIT A , THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION IN 1111 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW r i (,A E:D DATE OF NOTICE: June 15,2011 FILE NUMBERS: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2011-00002 (Type II Land Use Application) TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2011-00010 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2011-00014 FILE NAME: TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER APPLICANT: VLMK Consulting Engineers OWNER: Tigard Distribution Center LLC Jennifer Kimura c/o Deering Management Group 3993 SW Kelly Avenue 4800 SW Macadam Avenue,Suite 120 Portland,OR 97239 Portland,OR 97239 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two existing, multi-tenant,industrial buildings. In addition the applicant is requesting removal of two trees within lightly limited significant habitat area. There is a wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area,but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. LOCATION: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road;Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S101BD,Tax Lot 200. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise,glare, odor,and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 29,2011. All comments should be directed to Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner(503.718.2437) in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at 503.639.4171 or by e-mail to cherylcna.tigard-or.gov. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JULY 14, 2011. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE MAILED A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. ti WRI II EN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALT. ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRITTVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMTITED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTTTLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site;all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application,written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. If you want to inspect the file, please call and make an appointment with either the project planner or the planning technicians. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of$.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." tAw y' . ._ �/ VICINITY MAP 2,`'" OEM ae ■� k.,' =U„1' -e■■ ■rpm .010.,,.0•0.: \I J ■ rwe+�aoae X �!i ♦ il ":3�� .lilies• ; ' Minn OM `�r' •, . 1 sup; si� OM 4 C Atu, Plims.'sin pr. rev /pr. Irmiiii7,1111 .,. Aws,.., II, 0.4,,,,,-i Arne, r W_W W Ill mg ,, 1400, ... A, i / Milliklk\ •'4,41- Fset • 111•111111/.. 9111L., \ '''. "-- _...ai A:RIF& ES 0 004 • VLMK Consulting Engineers SDR2011-00002/TRE2011-00010/TRE2011-00014 Jennifer Kimura TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER 3993 SW Kelly Ave. Portland, OR 97239 EXHIBIT Tigard Distribution Center LLC c/o Deering Management Group 4800 SW Macadam Ave,Suite 120 Portland, OR 97239 CVG Oregon LLC 7800 Walton Pkwy. New Albany, OH 43054 R 2S101BD00105 - 01CA00100 AK FLORIDA OUTDOOR INC FIEL• F- •W REVOCABLE LIVING BY CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR 1149 •VENPORT 715 NE EVERETT ST P.'TLAND, •* 97201 PORTLAND,OR 97232 2S101 BD00104 '101 DB00300 CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR FIE •S,F'- •W REVOCABLE LIVING 715 NE EVERETT ST 114• . •AVENPORT PORTLAND,OR 97232 '•-TLAND, •• 97201 ' 101BD0010' 2S101CA00700 CL ' C. 'NEL OUTDOOR GOULD FAMILY PROPERTIES VI LLC 715 1 ' -ETT ST BY TURRETT STEEL INDUSTRIES INC P.-TLAND, •R 97232 527 ATANDO AVE CHARLOTTE,NC 28206 S101BD00103 2S101CB00100 CL R C EL OUTDOOR HUTTIG,INC 715 RETT ST 555 MARVILLE CENTER DR RTLAND, R 97232 PO BOX 1041 CHESTERFIELD,MO 63006 2S101BB01201 2S101BC00101 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION KNEZ REALTY GROUP LLC PROPERTY TAX DEPT 111 12301 SE HWY 212 999 LAKE DR CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 101BA00200 2S101BC00100 CO 0 WH ESALE CORPORATION KNEZ,JOHN S SR&JEANNE M PROPE AX DEPT 111 12301 SW HWY 212 999 E DR CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 AQUAH,WA 98027 2S101BD00200 2S101BA00101 CVG OREGON LLC PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES LP 7800 WALTON PKWY 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 NEW ALBANY,OH 43054 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S101AB02700 2S101BD00300 EAGLE HARDWARE&GARDEN, INC PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING GROUP IN ATTN TAX DEPT(TA3) 16400 COLLEGE BLVD PO BOX 1111 LENEXA,KS 66219 NORTH WILKESBORO,NC 28656 2S101BD00301 2S101CA00400 EAST SIDE VAN&STORAGE,INC RUSSELL FAMILY LIVING TRUST 4836 SE POWELL BLVD DAWN NEW HUNZIKER LLC PORTLAND,OR 97206 WELLS APARTMENTS LLC ET AL EAST WENATCHEE,WA 98802 251010001100 2S101AB01500 FIELDS,FRED W REVOCABLE LIVING SJP LLC 1149 SW DAVENPORT 7615 SW BEVELAND RD PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 101BD0030 TIG• '14 OF 131 - - • L ARD,OR 9 223 2S101CA00200 WALL STREET INDUSTRIAL LLC A RICHARD VIAL EXECUTIVE CENTER LLC 7000 SW VARNS ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101BB01400 WALTON CWOR PARK BC 8 LLC BY CTMT-WALTON RE TAX 4678 WORLD PARKWAY CIR ST LOUIS,MO 63134 2S101AC01900 WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.23 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC00103 WETLANDS CONSERVANCY INC PO BOX 1195 TUALATIN,OR 97062 Mildren Design Group Nathan and Ann Murdock Attn: Gene Mildren PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Susan Beilke 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci Dayle D. & Evelyn 0. Beach 11285 SW 78th Avenue 11530 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Shannen Williams Rappold Norris Beggs & Simpson Marketing/Business Development Manager Perlo Construction 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 7190 SW Sandburg Street Portland, OR 97204 Portland, OR 97223 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (1.1curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED. 13-Dec-10 2S101BD00200 CVG OREGON LLC 7800 WALTON PKWY NEW ALBANY,OH 43054 (4//// orb ......mwsumiv- ,�` 1111 r� NTA S Area Notified (500 Ft) I Q � tra *;* 111111 �i VLMK Engineers _'t", � tillii-1:vs4 � 2S 101 BD, 00200 1I �rr1;si : 01110L,_ \ ALL IR �gRTiyo ■ -� :�., k. 1 .).- fr. . ,..„ ,. . .. ., ., ,. ...,.. , ..._ ...E. ,.. ``a .. ,,1 ■■■ SuhjecI Site . 4/.. ``` �iV. \,VW V ■■■■. I \a iml a lit \ ...` :1yE/y1•l:irli:lr — \ rr v. ,�` `I `r P�.*.*.*.4 `� ` ��� ■ Property owner informatioP is valid � ♦... for 3 months from the date rimed on \V 1:3!* -- . Iiiiiiiirill IOW to , \ flOk 11 ill Illi♦ 1i� ►...♦ �■■ ■� 410\ 1 `1 ♦..♦• ` \ ■ this map •• `./� \`` N� Map Printed:01-Jun-11 `*t!` 1111116A mu` only and should be verified with the Development • � ,��■■.■■■■I...■ ,L�,1 te „ 1.14m MAPS iT 503 6C 49177112' r ADD I Ir' N � � � WWW Ogerd-or goy ..RD 4 2S101BD00105 101CA00100 AK FLORIDA OUTDOOR INC FIEL F W REVOCABLE LIVING BY CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR 1149 VENPORT 715 NE EVERETT ST P TLAND, 97201 PORTLAND,OR 97232 2S101 BD00104 '.101 DB00300 CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR FIE •S,F•- •W REVOCABLE LIVING 715 NE EVERETT ST 114• ••VENPORT PORTLAND,OR 97232 •••TLAND, •' 97201 101BD0010' 2S101CA00700 CL ' C. 1NEL OUTDOOR GOULD FAMILY PROPERTIES VI LLC 715 ■ ' , •ETT ST BY TURRETT STEEL INDUSTRIES INC ••-TLAND, •R 97232 527 ATANDO AVE CHARLOTTE,NC 28206 S101BD00103 2S101CB00100 CL C EL OUTDOOR HUTTIG,INC 715 RETT ST 555 MARVILLE CENTER DR RTLAND, R 97232 PO BOX 1041 CHESTERFIELD,MO 63006 2S101BB01201 2S101BC00101 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION KNEZ REALTY GROUP LLC PROPERTY TAX DEPT 111 12301 SE HWY 212 999 LAKE DR CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 101BA00200 2S101BC00100 CO 0 ESALE CORPORATION KNEZ,JOHN S SR&JEANNE M PROPE AX DEPT 111 12301 SW HWY 212 999 E DR CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 AQUAH,WA 98027 2S1018D00200 2S101BA00101 CVG OREGON LLC PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES LP 7800 WALTON PKWY 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY*300 NEW ALBANY,OH 43054 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S101AB02700 2S101BD00300 EAGLE HARDWARE&GARDEN,INC PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING GROUP IN ATTN:TAX DEPT(TA3) 16400 COLLEGE BLVD PO BOX 1111 LENEXA,KS 66219 NORTH WILKESBORO,NC 28656 25101 BD00301 2S101 CA00400 EAST SIDE VAN&STORAGE,INC RUSSELL FAMILY LIVING TRUST 4836 SE POWELL BLVD DAWN NEW HUNZIKER LLC PORTLAND,OR 97206 WELLS APARTMENTS LLC ET AL EAST WENATCHEE,WA 98802 251010001100 2S101AB01500 FIELDS,FRED W REVOCABLE LIVING SJP LLC 1149 SW DAVENPORT 7615 SW BEVELAND RD PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 . { 01800030 TIG OF 131 L ARD,OR 9 223 2S101CA00200 WALL STREET INDUSTRIAL LLC A RICHARD VIAL EXECUTIVE CENTER LLC 7000 SW VARNS ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101BB01400 WALTON CWOR PARK BC 8 LLC BY CTMT-WALTON RE TAX 4678 WORLD PARKWAY CIR ST LOUIS,MO 63134 2S101AC01900 WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.23 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC00103 WETLANDS CONSERVANCY INC PO BOX 1195 TUALATIN,OR 97062 • Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design Group PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Susan Beilke 11250 SW 82"d Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci Dayle D. & Evelyn 0. Beach 11285 SW 78th Avenue 11530 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Shannen Williams Rappold Norris Beggs & Sim son Marketing/Business Development Manager gg p Perlo Construction 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 7190 SW Sandburg Street Portland, OR 97204 Portland, OR 97223 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Crag head 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 13-Dec-10 06/01/2011 11:48 FAX 503 248 13 VLMK ENGINEERS a001/001 kilt) : R 4-7j //o}f -/I ifi-111.-tvc)( .71 4 City of Tigard ' J /Mk1 1 ` V41 4-- ric,ARI Request for 500' Property Owner Mailing Labels PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF YOUR REQUEST PHONE:503-718-2438/FAX:503-718-2748/E-MAIL:pa ai)tjz rid-or.guv PLEASE INDICATE ALL MAP&TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S134AB,Tax Lot 00100) THAT ARE INCLUDED IN YOUR PROJECT OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW: (If more than one(1)tax lot or if the parcel has no address,you must separately identify each tax lot associated with the project. I -- 00 5 (-tifik i ----.Z-S 10 i P002-00 Vi, t v01 bISi- - c4-v-- / SPV_20I 1--0002. 1/-pezuli-coolo ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City,and the project planner has reviewed your application for completeness,you will be notified by means of an incompleteness letter to obtain your 2 final sets of labels. IF YOU HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED BY PLANNING TO OBTAIN YOUR LABELS,PLEASE INDICATE BELOW THAT YOU NEED 2 SETS OF LABELS. Completeness Letter Received Indicating 2 Sets of Envelopes w/Affixed Address Labels Required --171 The 2 final sets of labels need to be placed on envelopes (no self-adhesive envelopes please) with first class letter-rate postage on the envelopes in the form of postage stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address) and resubmitted to the City for the purpose of providing notice to property owners of the proposed land use application and the decision. The 2 sets of envelopes must be kept separate. The person listed below will be called to pick up and pay for the labels when they are ready. +� NAME OF CONTACT PER�O,N^:^�� VI I V14 uV"L HONE: . ) 222--"4 "4 C1 NAME OF COMPANY: 1Jl�/V 1 FAX: 'ra - i - _ EMAIL: OC..(ivi RIP Wl • C41W1 This request can be sent by e-mail,US mail,faxed,or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request,the contact person listed will be called to pick up their request that will be placed in"Will Call"by the company name(or by the contact person's last name if no company) at the Planning/Engineering Counter in the Permit Center. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick uo,as exact cost cannot be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list,plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet). Then,multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. I -EXAMPLE -COST FOR THIS REQUEST- I 2.1 sheets of labels x$2/sheet-$8.00 x 2 sets= $16.00 41_sheet(s)of labels a$2/sheet=S 11 x a sets= 1 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties x 2 sets= $ 4.00 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties= ,N sets= GENERATE LIST = $11.00 GATE LIST = $11 TOTAL = $31.00 at�� TOTAL 00 C:\Documents and Settings\jenniferk\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Contenc.Outlook\HBAYINUK\500'Property Owner Mailing Labels Request.d (Update&29-Sep-1 0) Patty Lunsford From: Patty Lunsford Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 2:59 PM To: 'jenniferk @vlmk.com' Subject: Property Owner Mailing Labels Request is Ready Hi Jennifer, Your request for mailing labels is ready to be picked up. The cost is$23.00. I will leave your labels in "will-call" under the name "VLMK Consulting Engineers" at the Planning/Engineering counter in the Permit Center. Our counter hours are from 8-4:30,Tuesday-Friday. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Best Regards, Patty Lunsford Planning Assistant City of Tigard I Current Planning 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,Oregon 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Phone 1 503.718.2438 Email I patty @ tgard-or.gov 1 r , 11 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING fir. I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Assistant for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: ,luck\11m.pna N.ts!Ikl''w © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2011-00002/TRE2011-00010/TRE2011-00014—TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER (I-de No/Name Rekn ice) 0 AMENDED NOTICE ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof, on July 22,2011,and deposited in the United States Mail on July 22,2011, postage prepaid. 1 : ' (Person that Pre.;red Nonce) / STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the I`� day of Jtpttm be-r- ,2011. OFFICIAL SEAL - BRITS 1 PEERIAN r._ i) NOTARY PUBLIC -OREGON N. oe COMMISSION NO.459137 NI COMOROS EQMES pm 21,111$ / .NOTARY PUBLF OREGON My Commission Expires: 28, 2.0 IS EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2011-00002 1 TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER TIGARD 120 DAYS = 10/6/2011 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER CASE NOS.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2011-00002 Tree Removal Permit (TRE) TRE2011-00010 Tree Removal Permit (TRE) TRE2011-00014 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two existing, multi-tenant, industrial buildings. In addition the applicant is requesting removal of two trees within lightly limit significant habitat area. There is a wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area, but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. APPLICANT: VLMK Consulting Engineers OWNER: Tigard Distribution Center LLC Jennifer Kimura c/o Deering Management Group 3993 SW Kelly Ave. 4800 SW Macadam Ave, Suite 120 Portland, OR 97239 Portland, OR 97239 LOCATION: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Rd.;WCTM 2S101BD,Tax Lot 200. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise,glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request for Site Development Review and Tree Removal subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR201]-00002/11GARI)DIS IRIBU ION CENTER PAGE 1 OF 23 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: Cheryl Caines 503-718-2437. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. If discussions with the neighboring property owner include plan revisions, then the applicant shall submit the revised site plan for review and approval prior to issuance of site/building permits to ensure Tigard Community Development Code ('1DC) standards are still satisfied. In addition, if the Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter is amended as part of these discussions,then a copy of the amended letter must also be submitted. 2. Prior to issuance of site/building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval that shows a walkway crossing a vehicular way that is a minimum of 4 feet wide and no longer than 36 feet. 3. The applicant shall provide additional street trees along the eastern and western portion of the street frontage to meet the spacing requirements in section 18.745.040.C. 4. The applicant shall provide additional parking lot trees within the front,middle, and back parking lots to meet the"one tree for every seven parking spaces" standard in section 18.745.050.E. 5. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit a mitigation plan to the City Arborist for review and approval. The plan must have a signature of approval from the project arborist certifying that it meets the requirements of 18.790.060(D) and that the species and placement of mitigation trees has been reasonably calculated to provide for their growth to maturity. The mitigation proposal shall show the species,location, and spacing of mitigation trees in relation to buildings,infrastructure,existing trees on adjacent sites, street trees, and each other. 6. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a cash assurance (letter of credit or cash deposit) for the equivalent value of mitigation required (e.g. 136 caliper inches of proposed mitigation tree planting x $125/caliper inch). Any trees successfully planted on or off-site,m accordance with an approved Tree Mitigation Plan and TDC I8.790.060.D,will be credited gainst the assurance two years after all of the trees are planted. After the plan is approved and t the trees are planted, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the City Arborist to certify that all of the mitigation trees were properly planted per the approved Tree Mitigation Plan in order to set the starting point of the two year tree establishment period. After the two year establishment period, the applicant shall provide a re-inventory of the mitigation trees conducted by a certified arborist in order to document mitigation tree survival, and compliance with the approved Tree Mitigation Plan. The remaining value of caliper inches not successfully mitigated. shall be paid as a fee in-lieu of planting. Failure to plant and provide documentation of mitigation tree planting by the project arborist within 6 months of certificate of occupancy issuance shall result in the forfeiture of the cash assurance to the City's tree fund. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,ATTN: GUS DUENAS 503-639-4171, EXT 2470. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 7. Before any work commences on-site or on the public improvements, the applicant shall apply for and obtain a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit from the City to cover half-street improvements,sanitary sewer,easement restoration and any other work in the public right-of-way or easement. The plans submitted shall include private water quality and detention facilities as part of the permit application. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans stamped by a professional engineer shall be submitted for review to the Development Engineer. NO1E: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements and detention and water quality facilities that have to be inspected during construction and monitored afterwards. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.tigard-or.gov). NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR201 1-000 02/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 2 OF 23 8. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Development Engineer will delay processing of project documents. No work shall begin until the PFI permit is issued. 9. The PFI permit will cover all water quality treatment work on the site. The applicant shall provide on-site water quality treatment facilities as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Development Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 10. The PFI permit will also cover all storm water detention facilities on the site. The applicant shall provide on-site detention facilities in accordance with the approved plans. The applicant shall provide on-site detention calculations as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20) and ODOT. Final lans and calculations shall be submitted to the Development Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of the PFI permit. In addition,a proposed maintenance plan for long-term maintenance of the facilities shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20) Chapter 2. 12. The applicant shall comply with the conditions of the CWS (Clean Water Services) Service Provider Letter. All work to comply with the CWS conditions will be covered and inspected under the PFI permit. This includes review, inspection and approval of any work performed within the vegetated corridor. Easements required as part of this work shall be delineated and submitted for review and approval under the PFI permit review and approval process. 13. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the construction phase. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION,ATTN: Cheryl Caines 503-639-4171, EXT 2437. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 14. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall contact the Staff Planner, Cheryl Caines, 503-718-2437 for final walk-through. All site improvements must be completed per approved plans. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,ATTN: GUS DUENAS 503-639-4171, EXT 2470. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 15. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete the required public improvements in accordance with approved plans. 16. Prior to final inspection,easements required to meet CWS vegetated corridor requirements,reviewed and approved under the PFI permit process,shall be executed and recorded. 17. After water quality facilities have been installed, the applicant's engineer shall submit documentation to the Development Engineer certifying that the water quality facilities were constructed in NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR201I-00002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 3 OF 23 accordance with the approved plans and comply with CWS standards. 18. After storm water detention facilities have been installed, the applicant's engineer shall submit documentation to the Development Engineer certifying that the detention facilities were constructed in accordance with the approved plans and comply CWS standards. 19. After completion and certification of the water quality treatment and detention facilities, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City on City-furnished forms for long-term maintenance of the facilities. The agreement will be recorded and the City will be inspecting the facilities periodically for compliance with the terms of the agreement. 20. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a disk of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development,and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates,referenced to NAD 83 (91). 21. The applicant's engineer shall submit a final sight distance certification prior to City approval of the completed project improvements. 22. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant must pay the fee-in lieu of undergrounding for the overhead utilities along Hunziker Road.The fee shaff be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be based on$35.00 per lineal foot. The project has 850 lineal feet of frontage. The fee-in-lieu amount for this project is therefore$29,750.00. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Vicinity&Site Information: The 6.4 acre site is located south of Highway 217 on the north side of SW Hunziker Road. The site is zoned Light Industrial (I-L) and developed with two large industrial buildings with a mix of industrial tenants. Other properties in the vicinity are also zoned I-L with industrial uses. Two vacant parcels zoned Industrial Park (I-P) lie near the site at the intersection of SW Wall Street and SW Hunziker Road. There is a railroad spur on the east side of the building. Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and did not find a record of the original site development review. The City does not have a record of the original site development review approval, however, a minor modification was granted June 21, 1999 which approved additional parking, repairs, and upgrades to the site. These improvements have been completed and are reflected on the site plan. In December 1999 the applicant received approval of a Site Development Review (SDR1999-00018) to construct a 9,450 square foot addition and 25 additional parking spaces on the existing site. These modifications were never constructed. Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to expand the parking lots on both the north and south side ends of the buildings and a revision of existing parking areas on the west side of the building to comply with current city standards. The applicant is also proposing to install two new garbage enclosures. Architectural upgrades of the south elevation are also proposed, including the addition of a canopy. Façade changes do not require a land use review in the I-L zone; therefore those changes are not discussed within this decision. In addition the applicant is requesting two tree removal permits in order to remove two trees within habitat area. There is an existing wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area,but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 4 OF 23 SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal,and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. In addition, staff posted two notices on the site, visible from the street. Staff received one comment via e-mail regarding the proposal. Eastside Van and Storage owns the property to the north of the site. This property includes a flag portion that stretches south to SW Hunziker Road. Mr. Keith Ashcraft with Eastside Van and Storage commented about how the proposed rear parking lot will block access to a billboard on the Eastside property through an existing gravel road across the Tigard Distribution Center property. Mr. Ashcraft asked for assurance of continued, unrestricted access. In addition, he asked for a like understanding that this proposal would accommodate their parking needs and free up his property (flag portion) from their needs except for access only. STAFF RESPONSE: The issues Mr. Ashcraft raised are not directly related to the approval criteria for the parking lot expansion. These comments were passed along to the applicant and both property owners have come to an agreement that ensures access to the adjoining property without further disturbing the wetland on the Eastside Storage site. This compromise includes a possible plan revision. The applicant is being conditioned to submit the revised site plan for review and approval prior to issuance of site/building permits to ensure Tigard Community Development Code (TDC) standards are still satisfied. In addition,if the Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter was amended, a copy of the amended letter must also be submitted. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts B. Additional Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 isual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONING DISTRICT Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the I-L zoning district: Light Industrial. Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that the development standards in Industrial Zoning Districts are contained in Table 18.530.2 below: NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR201I-O(X)02/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER P\GI:501.23 TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-L EXISTING and PROPOSED Minimum Lot Size None 6.44 acres Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. Approx.300 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 35 ft. 80 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots 111 20 ft. N/A -Side yard 0/50 ft. 30/90 ft -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - -Rear yard 0 ft.121 135 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting - - a public or private street. Maximum Height 75 ft. 33 ft. Maximum Site Coverage 85% 85% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 15% 11]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. 121 No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. The site is zoned I-L. Because the proposal is only to add additional parking for an existing building, many of the development standards are not affected. The exceptions are maximum site coverage and minimum landscape requirements. As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with these percentages. Details are presented by the applicant on the Site Plan (G1.0). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been fully satisfied. C. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards requite that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access,Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided a site plan showing existing access from SW Hunziker Road. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. There is an existing joint access used by the applicant,which is partially located on the flag portion of the adjacent site. A copy of the title report was provided by the applicant showing the 25-foot roadway easement granted to the subject property. This standard is met. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. NoTici '1YP1i 11 DECISION SDR2011-0(X1112/11GARD DISTRIBUTION CEN'1'IiR PAGE 6 OF 23 The current access to be maintained is to Hunziker Road, a public street. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi- building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; A new on-site pedestrian walkway is proposed from the building entrance to the parking area and public sidewalk on Hunziker Road. This standard is met. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; A walkway that crosses a vehicle access drives is proposed from the building to Hunziker Road. The proposed walkway is 3 feet wide, approximately 40 feet long across the drive aisle, and marked with striping. This does not meet the standard which requires a minimum of 4 feet and no greater than 36 feet in length if pavement markings are used in lieu of separations. A condition of approval will ensure this standard is satisfied. FINDING: The walkway requirements are not satisfied as proposed, but can be met as conditioned below. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans indicate the walkways will be concrete with the exception of the walkway crossing the parking lot. This portion of the walkway will be asphalt with adequate striping to identify the walkway location. New light poles will be installed in the parking areas to illuminate pedestrian ways. This standard has been met. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The preliminary sight distance certification submitted is satisfactory. This standard is met with the preliminary sight distance certification submittal. A final sight distance certification shall be submitted after construction of the site improvements. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 7 OF 23 Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The existing driveway will not be modified or affected. This section is not applicable. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.I provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. One access point is required for this project,which has over 100 parking spaces. One 55-foot paved access drive is provided to Hunziker Road. Vehicular access ways are within 40 feet of the primary ground floor entrance;therefore this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the access egress and circulation requirements have not been fully met,but can be as conditioned below. CONDITION: Prior to issuance of site/building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval that shows a walkway crossing a vehicular way that is a minimum of 4 feet wide and no longer than 36 feet. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (18.725): Noise: For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible emissions: Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack of other point- source emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-013 and 340-28- 070) apply. Vibration: No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors: The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat: No direct or sky-reflected glare,whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted and; there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or constructing equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents: All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. The site is developed with two industrial buildings which house a mix of industrial tenant uses. This proposal is only to expand the existing parking lots, and does not include a change of use. Therefore, these Environmental Performance Standards do not apply. NO'l7CR'IYPE II DECISION SDR2011-(X)002/TIGARD DISIRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 8 OF 23 FINDING: Based on the above, there is no evidence that the Environmental Performance Standards will not be met. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING (18.745): All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock (ANSI Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions). Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the most recent edition of the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. Certificate of Occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity(small,medium or large). The site fronts Hunziker Road. The City Arborist notes that the minimum street tree spacing has not been satisfied with the species that is proposed. The applicant has been conditioned to provide a revised plan to ensure this standard is met. FINDING: The spacing standard for street trees is not satisfied, but can be met as conditioned below. Buffering and Screening. Section 18.745.050 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Buffering and/or screening are required for dissimilar uses. The site is surrounded by similar industrial uses and the proposal is only to add parking. No buffering is required for this development. Special Provision: Screening and Landscaping of Parking Areas Section 18.745.050.E recuires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. An evergreen hedge is proposed along Hunziker Road to screen the parking area from view. A mix of trees, shrubs and groundcover in landscape areas are proposed to achieve a balance between low lying and vertical landscaping. Berms or fences are not proposed. Landscape islands are all at least six feet wide. The City Arborist noted that the parking lot trees do not meet the distribution requirement of one (1) tree for each seven (7) spaces;therefore,this standard has not been met. The applicant is being conditioned to ensure the parking lot tree requirements are satisfied. FINDING: The screening and landscaping of parking areas standard is not fully met but can be met as conditioned below. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/'I'IGARD DISIRIBLIDON CENTER PAGE 9 OF 23 Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant indicates the refuse collection area will be enclosed by 6-foot chain link with slat fences and a gate. The enclosures will house both garbage and recycling. This criterion is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. CONDITIONS: ♦ The applicant shall provide additional street trees along the eastern and western portion of the street frontage to meet the spacing requirements in section 18.745.040.C. ♦ The applicant shall provide additional parking lot trees within the front, middle, and back parking lots to meet the "one tree for every seven parking spaces" standard in section 18.745.050.E. MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on- site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant is proposing to meet the Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off method of compliance. Based on the use a minimum of 720 square feet of storage area would be required to meet the minimum standards. This amount of storage cannot be provided by the applicant. The applicant has provided an approval letter from Pride Disposal. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropnately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. Recyclable storage will be co-located with the solid waste storage. The exterior collection bins will have lids to comply with IBC and IFC codes. The enclosures will be located in two areas adjacent to the loading docks and not within setbacks or parking areas for easier garbage hauler pick-up. Screening which meets City standards has been proposed. The location has been reviewed and approved by the service provider, Pride Disposal. NO'l1CF.TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/'1IGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 10 OF 23 Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The plans indicate that the storage area will have a 20-foot-wide gate opening (G5.0 — Site Details). Screening is provided by a chain link fence and secured gate with slats. Access standards. Access to storage areas can be limited for security reasons. However, the storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service; Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access.A minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered; Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. If only a single access point is available to the storage area, adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. The proposed garbage enclosures are located adjacent to the loading docks for easy tenant access. These loading areas are designed for large trucks and provide adequate maneuvering space for garbage hauler pick-up. The enclosures are not located near a public street. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage standards are met. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces;4) Long-term spaces. According to measurements taken from the plans, the parking associated with this project is within 20 feet of the building. All parking has been proposed to be located on-site. Three additional handicap accessible spaces are being proposed near the primary entrance. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint Parking_ Owners of two or more uses, structures or arcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. The development has no shared parking. This standard does not apply. NO'T'ICE TYPE.II DECISION SDR20111X1002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER P:AGI:11 OF 23 Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060, 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1-3 above. The proposed building is not a mixed-use project. This standard is not applicable. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is required to provide a minimum of five ADA parking spaces. There are two existing spaces and three more are proposed. Final determination of the number and design of the required ADA spaces will be made by the building official during the review of the building permit application. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off- street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795,Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvenng within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation). No drop-off grade separation is proposed. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces clearly marked with striping, and the direction of flow is clear since there is only one access to the site. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011- 0002/11GARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 12 OF 23 The applicant states that the parking lot has been designed to accommodate stalls that do not require wheel stops. The spaces have been designed with a 3-foot overhang beyond the face of the curb. These overhang areas are designed with a wider sidewalk or low lying landscaping that does not count toward the minimum 15% landscape area requirement. The applicant notes that there are a few locations where the overhang could not be accommodated (along the east side of the building near the main entrance). The applicant states that wheel stops are proposed for this area. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. Stall width dimensions may be distributed as 50% standard spaces, 50% compact spaces. All compact spaces shall be labeled as such. The applicant's plans indicate that of the 156 parking stalls, none are compact. Dimensions of the 90 degree parking spaces are 9 ft. by 18.5 ft. for standard stalls. The drive aisles are two-way and a width of 26 feet minimum. This standard is met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Bicycle parking is provided within 50 feet of entrances to both buildings. It is visible from on-site and Hunziker Road. The designated bike parking areas will not be within parking aisles or pedestrian ways. This criterion is satisfied. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long- term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The site plan shows the location of the bicycle parking. The plan shows that the parking will be steel loop racks, secured to the ground. The surface will be concrete. All spaces are uncovered and designed to meet the 2.5 feet x 6 feet requirements (per site plan). This criterion is satisfied. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for industrial uses is 0.1 spaces per 1,000 feet of floor area. Twelve spaces are required. The site plan shows two parking areas with 12 spaces provided. The minimum requirement is satisfied. NO'T'ICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/'I'IGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 13 OF 23 Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. The minimum off-street parking requirement for the development is 132 spaces based on the existing uses of manufacturing,warehouse and office. A total of 156 spaces are proposed. There is no maximum for industrial uses; therefore a maximum does not apply in this case. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. This is an industrial development with existing off-street loading spaces. No additional square footage is proposed with this application; therefore no additional loading spaces are required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above the off-street parking and loading requirements are satisfied. TREE REMOVAL(18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. A tree plan dated April 26, 2011(with an amendment dated May 9, 2011) by Overlook Tree Preservation has been provided by the applicant, and contains all of the required elements. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; The Arborist Report identified nine trees on site over six inch diameter (Tree 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14). Seven of these trees are over 12 inch diameter, and two are less than 12 inch diameter (Tree 10 and 11). 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. All seven trees over 12 inch diameter will be removed, so 100% of the 136 inches removed are required to be mitigated. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; This requirement has been met. All trees will be removed. NO'110E'lYPE 1I DECISION SDR211114xuX12/11GARD D!s'TRIBUIlON CENTER PAGE 14 OF 23 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This requirement is not applicable because all trees will be removed. 18.790.040 Incentives for Tree Retention B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. This requirement is not applicable because all trees will be removed. 18.790.050 Permit Applicability Section 18.790.050, tree removal permits are required only for the removal of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as defined by Chapter 18.775. The permit for removal of a tree shall be processed as a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using the following approval criteria: Removal of the tree must not have a measurable negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters or water quality as evidenced by an erosion control plan which precludes: a) deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or similar material exceeding 1/2 cubic foot in volume on public or private streets, adjacent property, or into the storm and surface water system, either by direct deposit, dropping, discharge or as a result of the action of erosion; b) evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soils; turbid or sediment-laden flows; or evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on bare soil slopes where the flow of water is not filtered or captured on site using the techniques of Chapter 5 of the Washington County Unified Sewerage Agency Environmental Protection and Erosion Control rules. Two of the trees proposed for removal are within Significant Habitat Areas,which are classified as sensitive lands. These two trees are on the north side of the building and not near the public street. Erosion control fencing is proposed at the boundary of the site to prevent deposits of mud and similar material onto the adjacent site. Storm drains will be protected with bags to filter water prior to entering the storm system. There is no evidence of concentrated flows over bare soils as a result of removing the two trees from the site. All bare areas will be bedded with straw or seeded to prevent erosion. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have not been fully met; however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: ♦ Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit a mitigation plan to the City Arborist for review and approval. The plan must have a signature of approval from the project arborist certifying that it meets the requirements of 18.790.060(D) and that the species and placement of mitigation trees has been reasonably calculated to provide for their growth to maturity. The mitigation proposal shall show the species, location, and spacing of mitigation trees in relation to buildings, infrastructure, existing trees on adjacent sites, street trees, and each other. ♦ Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a cash assurance (letter of credit or cash deposit) for the equivalent value of mitigation required (e.g. 136 caliper inches of proposed mitigation tree planting x $125/caliper inch). Any trees successfully planted on or off-site, in accordance with an approved Tree NOi10E'IYPI?II DECISION SDR2011-00002/IIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 15 0E 23 Mitigation Plan and TDC 18.790.060.D,will be credited against the assurance two years after all of the trees are planted. After the plan is approved and the trees are planted, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the City Arborist to certify that all of the mitigation trees were properly planted per the approved Tree Mitigation Plan in order to set the starting point of the two year tree establishment period. After the two year establishment period, the applicant shall provide a re-inventory of the mitigation trees conducted by a certified arborist in order to document mitigation tree survival, and compliance with the ap roved Tree Mitigation Plan. The remaining value of caliper inches not successfully mitigated shall be paid as a fee in-lieu of planting. Failure to plant and provide documentation of mitigation tree planting by the project arborist within 6 months of certificate of occupancy issuance shall result in the forfeiture of the cash assurance to the City's tree fund. VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant's narrative does not address the visual clearance requirements, however there are no structures proposed within the visual clearance areas. The code requires vision clearance to be met at driveways; therefore the applicant must continue to comply with this standard in the future. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously hsted sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3, 5, 6, 7 & 8 (residential developments and 100-year floodplain). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore,will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage);and 18.360.090.14(Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal. The buildings already exist on the site and no additions are proposed. Trees were preserved where possible and incorporated into the parking lot landscape islands. Tree mitigation is required for this development and discussed later in the decision. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage patterns, identified per Section Map." Methods and the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas Ma ethods and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following: (1) Water quality facilities (for infiltration, retention, detention and/or treatment); (2) Pervious pavement; (3) Soil amendment; (4) Roof runoff controls; (5) Fencing to guide animals toward safe passageways; (6) Re-directed outdoor lighting to reduce spill-off into habitat areas; (7) Preservation of existing vegetative and canopy cover. NO'I ICI,'1 YI'l II DI?CISION SDR2011-00002/11GARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 16 OE 23 The applicant has considered innovative construction methods to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat. The applicant's narrative shows that water quality will be handled with storm filter catch basins and the vegetative corridor for the off-site wetland is not being impacted by this proposal. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: (1) A deck, atio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A change in elevation or grade; (4) A change in the texture of the path material; (5) Sign; or (6) Landscaping. The applicant states that the new parking lots on the north and south side of the buildings are designed to provide a safer and more efficient environment for the employees and customers. There are a couple of patio areas with picnic tables proposed for employees. There is a sidewalk that leads only to the front entrance of building A and nowhere else on the site. The site is relatively flat and most portions are visible from the street. The proposal includes significant enhancement of the site landscaping which will better define public and private areas. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Intenor laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet,which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The elevation alteration includes additional windows on the south side of the building, which will increase visibility to the outdoors. The new parking areas will include light poles to illuminate areas used by pedestrians. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. There is an existing transit route on Hunziker Street approximately with a stop adjacent to the site. A request for comments was sent to Tri-met,but no comments were submitted. FINDING: Based on the analysis above the Site Development Review criteria have been satisfied. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS (18.810): Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011d10002/1IGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 17 OF 23 Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030E and Figure 18.810.1 require a 5- lane arterial to have right-of-way varying from 100 feet to 104 feet, a 3-lane collector to have right-of- way varying from 70 to 74 feet, and a local street to have a 54-foot right-of-way. Other improvements required include sidewalks, bike lanes if designated as bike routes, underground utilities, street lighting,storm drainage,planter strips and street trees. Hunziker Street is a 3-lane collector street in the City's Transportation System Plan.The applicant is required to expand the existing right-of-way to 37 feet from centerline of right-of-way to accommodate the collector street cross-section required in an industrial zone.This calls for dedication of an additional 7 feet of right-of- way to the City of Tigard. Because the dedication is not roughly proportionate at this time, dedication is not required. However, the applicant has proposed the dedication and will comply with future development requirements. Street trees are required. Planting plan is subject to review and approval by the City arborist. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de- sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. There are no future streets or extensions of streets through this development. Street Ali gnment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1.995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. There are no future streets or extensions of streets through this development. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. No street extensions are proposed. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography,wetlands or other bodies of water or,pre-existing development or; NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-OO(K12/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 18 OF 23 ♦ For blocks adjacent to arterial streets,limited access highways,major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. No new streets are proposed. The existing block size is roughly 1,500 feet,under the 2,000-foot maximum. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. No new parcels are being created with this project. These standards do not apply. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The proposed development is not significant enough to require construction of street improvements along the property frontage. Sufficient right-of-way will be dedicated to accommodate future street widening (including p anters and sidewalk) along the frontage. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The building is already served by sanitary sewer.There is no requirement for any off-site sewer work. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Storm water detention and water quality treatment are required. The applicant proposes to install water quality treatment and detention facilities to accommodate the additional storm water runoff generated by additional impervious surface and to address the storm water currently being treated by an existing water quality swale to be removed as part of the project. Detention will be provided via StormTech underground chamber control systems and water quality will be addressed with Contech water quality treatment facilities. This standard is met. NO'I'I( ?TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-(XI0)2/11GARD I)ISIRBUI'ION CR.N'IT.R PAGE 19 OF 23 After the water quality treatment and detention facilities are completed, the applicant and the City shall enter into an agreement for long-term maintenance of the facilities. This agreement will be recorded and the City will inspect the facilities periodically to ensure compliance with the terms of the agreement. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways,bike lanes,or pedestrian pathways are required as part of this project due to the type and scope of the proposal. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction,high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: ♦ The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets;and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common,but not the only,such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines on Hunziker Street along the property frontage. In addition, there are overhead utility lines along the west property line serving the property and other facilities beyond the applicant's lot. A review of the feasibility of undergrounding the overhead lines indicates that undergrounding is not feasible in either corridor. Fee-in-lieu of undergrounding shall be paid. The total lineal footage for all power lines adjacent to the site is approximately 850 lineal feet. About 320 lineal feet is along the street frontage. The remainder of 530 lineal feet is on the north-south power line. Based on $35 per lineal foot, the fees would be $11,200.00 and$18,550 respectively. The total fee would be: $29,750.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: No change in building use or expansion of the existing building proposed. No traffic impact study will be required for this project. Fire and Life Safety: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) is the service provider for fire and emergency services. The applicant must work with TVF&R to ensure the project complies with all TVF&R regulations. Public Water System: The City of Tigard is the water service provider in this area. The property already has existing water service. NOTICE"IYI'F II DECISION SDR2011-00002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 20 OF 23 Public Water System: The City of Tigard is the water service provider in this area. The property already has existing water service. There are no water-related improvements proposed in the project. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water duality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for periodic maintenance of the water quality facility as needed. That agreement will be recorded and City will monitor its implementation. (For Private Facilities) To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. (For privately maintained Stormwater Management Units) The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Storm water quality treatment is required. The applicant proposes to install four new catch basins on site to capture and convey storm water to a new water quality vault to be constructed on site. The preliminary storm water treatment calculations indicate that two filters will be sufficient to treat the storm water entering the vault. The applicant's proposed treatment method once constructed will meet this requirement. However, the applicant must submit water quality calculations and proposed treatment facilities for city review and approval prior to issuance of a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit for those facilities. A preliminary water quality facility maintenance plan is required as part of the submittal for a PFI permit. That plan shall include a contract with a firm qualified to maintain the water quality facility in accordance with the manufacturer's maintenance recommendations. The construction of the facility shall be monitored by a professional engineer.After construction, that engineer shall provide written certification that the facility has been constructed in accordance with the approved plans. The final long-term maintenance plan shall be prepared after the facility is constructed. After completion of the water quality facility, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for future maintenance of the facility. The long-term maintenance plan will be incorporated into this agreement. The agreement will be recorded and the City will be inspecting the facility periodically to ensure compliance with the terms of the agreement. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over one acre, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This requires a 1200C permit application and needs to be approved before any site work begins on the project. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. No tic!,TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-(XXX)2/11GARD DISIRIBUIION CENTER PAGE 21 OF 23 Because the project will not be disturbing over 1 acre of area, a 1200CN permit is not required. A full set of improvement plans,including erosion control measures, shall be submitted to the City on 24-inch by 36-inch S(or 22 X 34) sheets for review, approval and issuance of a storm water connection permit from Clean Water ervices. Clean Water Services will be inspecting the erosion control measures for compliance with the approved plan. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.). A City PFI permit for the water quality and detention facilities and for any vegetated corridor work is required before any work begins on the site. Survey Requirements: Applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins,water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390): Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has submitted an Impact analysis that identifies the impact this development has on the infrastructure. The applicant's plans propose improvements or upgrades as needed to not have any adverse impact on the City infrastructure. No street improvements or dedications are required, however the Design Review Engineer has indicated that the applicant has proposed a dedication to meet current right-of-way requirements. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Urban Forester and Design Review Engineer reviewed the proposal. Their comments have been inserted into the decision. City of Tigard Public Works Department was sent a copy of the proposal. There were no comments on the proposal but will update records to note the updated storm system and water quality manhole. Tigard Police reviewed the application and indicated no objections. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services noted that a Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained. Review by the city's Development Services Engineering Division will insure this permit is obtained. Frontier Communications Northwest commented that there are indications of facilities being moved so the developer needs to contact Frontier to develop plans. STAFF RESPONSE: This information was passed along to the applicant's representative at VLMK, Bill Lambert. Bill indicated he would contact Frontier to work out issues. NOTICE'IYPE II DECISION SDR201I-0x002/1IGARD DISIRIBUI'ION CENTER PAGE 22 OF 23 SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 22,2011 AND BECOMES I EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 6,2011 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Areal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may a eal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. Of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10)business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hair Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Nonce of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. F—THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 5,2011. uestions: I you have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division,Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon at (503) 639-4171. Q . C.OLtJ July 21.2011 PREPARED Y: Cheryl Caines DATE Associate Planner July 21.2011 APPR VED BY: Ron Bunch DATE Community Development Director NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR2011-00002/TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER PAGE 23 OF 23 / I --r-AT LA Y \\ �P, f' VICINITY MAP II MI Emil MN SDR2011-00002 II r� TRE2011-00010 1T lIl A' � ' TRE2011-00014 4,1,,i• �, ���!� i� TIGARD DISTRIBUTION �_' > } ' CENTER,. \ .1,, /4 . An"in ____.. _ ,,..a. ___ r_ Subject Site,.,,,r "� ® WINN all 111 Pit Sip*v. .%III I. . ' I i 1 r ■ r , S r � a�` V 1011 . "1. ' ��LI PN I 4. 44, 14 4: viii ,„, oz. /16INI LI!II / 4 . ..la it/ Information on this map is for general location la only and should be verified with the • •!Aim. 111EF liolpp, 1 / il Development Services Division. // :441 �� Approx.Scale 1:9,000-1 In=667 ft ' 1,, / Y Map printed at 04:59 PM on 14-Jun-11 DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES THE CITY OF TIGARD/1 — il V.,) .., MANS WCCUATY,REPRESENTATION C OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT.ACCURACY, OR COMPLETENESS OMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NC; . LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS.OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMAT•TN PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. • Clty Ot I Igard Feet II :: . alvd� Train pS 1(73%09171772123 Q 1000 ._1.1'•11 • Ink ` ww.tigard-or.gov TIIfARD `5 w • , . CITY OF TIGARD • _52.,2?1_b_.!..- • I - ...t I 1 I : Approved IX 1 1 Conditionally Approved FOI only the work as described In: / 1 I PERMIT NO.. S DR 9-4/1" 0°00 21' . , .1 , . See Letter to: Fellow I I I / . Anach , Job Address: 7....1 i . AA, / 4. , fiwl soa4 £ .1,7A'. e / - • I By: C..,C Ma Date:. v •,-..",.-• t l / -.- - 00 ovatt.vg--.• ".,,-. r21,14,NNIIIIII, '... r . „ , . i t, •••.1 , ■ 1 / I• 0, • 0 o g 0 / ---,...,.- •n ' 1 \I I/ ..;2....''.///i'''' W•/// :'.2'.‘0/;. '. 0/A?:,9,..//).14 .)....')... .....;- 7<".7-•:/A....:LI,i'-44 --, .. . iii t [ 0 9 0 0 0 0' ' '__ ' ' . ••' '•_'..,. • : . - _. __1 4 _ / --I..' - 0 i ' sl .. / • a% 1.- OMB E 4, \ 4 .^./'i ...1 .....eri.n....i.:r''''. maims; ----,.----.-..—.--:-...-r-----.-• .7,-7.... ....... . 7-.1-.•...• .....• ; .. . NI : f •••1 0,....• - :i -. ':P 4. • . : dt';' - ' '".1/ ' : .=.r.:''''"' ' . li), --1,1 if . '''.. ...• C..--.. :170 ,110‘ ,..&__Aitoi rt.! i ....... .it .,,•‘.:,, . I .......... .f MI SIEV. , --1----- • • -r. -,: —it i , •ii ._...v..„ .1 t 1 . . 1 't;:ki■ -. •Ec'' ....-.....e...a. ... E.1,/ i -.. 0 ., . I 1 ri, , . , ,.. -....,.- 1 , 1 . /7-.„,, !Int 07, 1 1 f . 4 I; .,,...-/-'-• - • JI% 1....: 4.0,4 0 . • 1 1 •.....,..,...• ....;:,4.4,-..-. . ;,:, ', '^r` . I I al.MP • 9.111Ptaa ,-.1 ,f, , 1 ...- i _,„.. , :.,....„:„......:„.._ --f. .....,.........Tv---:-..,—.1-n. . ... a il. 7.27 '•-..f:'' ' ..3.11'- ' L.. — -n1 ' . se : ?'... , "",,,,,p9.-....‘:IIT.Y.e..Pi, .,' / t. .s...':. 1 • k! /../ ..._7,-_-_. . .;.; .,. . i.. _ , •• ,___ .-. t ___,.a111.11..,..iiiral - .111. 11.1114... __..._. ;:. •• 2 7_ .•I :• ., i-• •'....' , /0 "S"''''''r '"•; . : :: :-. . •" '''': ■v"4".3,' ' 1.. ..' El ...... u. -III o .--J..,-* ,•/!, / / ., ,, .....,_. - ,,,•- -- •. .4.4...L:;,.:,`A.z .; 1/2u..,,,t„::‘,,,,--, .,,,...-.4,.,•:-' .• -- :: _T-,:. . ..-. e ,n,..,_ .._ _. .., • : ,-- ................ _.__ „ am- : ". r6116--- .. • 'Li \, 4.;,:;,,,,,..g.§.1:. „ .1a 1 --- -•,- ,•,• . • .,..f ........ SIP7 :- ti; ,4.C.:.;:;i:;.;:':',;,;..9';:.i".•‘::;.YA1■‘,.\l",,!',r,,,.,:mar• • .-- _. ___ -- • -- • e /,,../ , , -. ..,..,.. ,....,••:':•,,:,:;,:,:,,.. ...,•••••,,.• •,‘„,, ,:,0•4ie.w . •... . .. ,....r.„...11: .... .,...... _ : __ •_7_ __........."A\t" .‘"."'w:v.'. ... 2. 1‘ V '''‘... 1, ,''.x,A,1 1 AYA;\Aitelk■,1 •A` :.'," t■"'t .44, I/ I ..- 1....arr...a . • ...• Vg.:..' - se ..,/Z.,7-'•////‘: A '' • j_4 • - sn,V.,.• • , / , .„,.„,„, .,,-. IT ....., ,A.I IA%..7r:,r.T. ''..re •‘,s 1.,,,‘1:,./ // X . ' ..1 1/• s' /,' i 04 •,//. • , l'• ....11016 Ma NW / Ialf/7.E gar., 0\\ .4 . / (./.<(/ • /47,.......= mum*fir •..=ors ffEwin Eflo C°■.='•...4.,•••■••••".14.4174..4s.o. U.1 1 • . OM.10.4 E.OMNI bawl.VI Ma INV tI) t::::::::1111...."11.1■11 141r, . ‘ ..1".... ...... 1 I .. • Z , 1._ .... z..—..... V , /.." / -7 •7 '"'".1.-...v."---.7.---:=4"'– ®............,..........— ..______.___.... ......._........____ . ........._..__.____. -....... ... _..___._ _.... o,....••••■•ir wil•••■•O.millnm mom. .......------—--..... - •• Lc/ 45[05••■••■••.all 00MM . ®........-.....w.■•••71 •SU sE owe.••■., -. 0)Paws mow fwEn Paw f.ode ino..EE•<....$1 •--—.......- -•........ ‘r. 6Erl:I=M■r" ._.... ._...._.._ . €0 Et.Es..so..Ka Ey.1.Eel Xi NEI °r IL tr ••11.'n''''' ...7' gf Nf RAI SYUB101.5 Lg...EC.IT i WEI/1/..■■111..1M1 'Ulf-PI VINING SIMPrl c f's a.m..wevaa.owns...el ow•Er,le..... 6 mum L•• .....om t----.:-.1,................... (s•■..............,.."..... 50,, • .„.......,............, , ,,,,,,,...„:„....:.....„,:......,.....L.:,:‘,„.., .....--.,... CA.Up am'aft 01-1 • wow La. :147.7.7.;.:1 Zr...r.Z.“...:.ntraVr''' .....--....." moor ram.om 1,...... WM& an" ....■=•: .■., 44..........ra r.....nr.,"V.......... i 2 .. As- ..■•.. IMIMJIY. EanI4EllEI KIT OW EsE/WEEls 4 IET 12='I.E....E....fE.-.0E1 .5 < e7.61011...1211.1.211114.21.11[1—._ ....... •"..... wren me son •Pso Ls pn CZ:=I P......-... :: I ■:....Z......, .-=....... au.* fEN. St.... ......... Imp. .7o. .• 11M1.ftEam•rocara fn.*MR .1.011for .....,,.... .... 111.1n aly. ,,...,.., ..,..,. •.......suot.., O.%In E leanocr 6 UNE:TrTrrRear:a.:Fr..'::=..a.... 4IC°It i w . ‘....••• LallIttidEL,,P.P..., .......... ... if roarE•=••.::•427=E•T 01"..g 1-- .., ....res....,Mato+;F.. aaaf..., ••••mem Ism 4 ...... ® •..''.••••••••••••••••••'••"••.•.. P:1 cii ........1 __. •••■■yr, Ea mar fonErearva pus••■ E W.. .11). .....ft Nap■••.1.1 a'No%Fen • .,,..,...... •„4.-,... a...7....., ............. no ras ..,n.ual sr, .1a•7 0=1 , Vass wly ve og an In,.SIP Li.17•111. "j-,....4.: ..... ...... paw.S.W. or. ea■ .I.Min Ea"war, INE..04 E.Ea ffE. MAY VII. ■Il C...7 Cif') •INLIS •Nr•...I, (......4 410 MK xl,,E...1 ..,...1•14 V.-12114: -. Cl.0 ,...pr. 5 c T S./L/', • .._ _...,... . . . .._. EXHIBIT.. VLMK Consulting Engineers SDR2011-00002/TRE2011-00010/TRE2011-00014 Jennifer Kimura TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER 3993 SW Kelly Ave. Portland, OR 97239 Tigard Distribution Center LLC c/o Deering Management Group 4800 SW Macadam Ave,Suite 120 Portland, OR 97239 CVG Oregon LLC 7800 Walton Pkwy. New Albany, OH 43054 East Side Van&Storage, Inc. Attn: Keith Ashcraft 4836 SE Powell Blvd. Portland, OR 97206 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING : 4v I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Assistant for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2011-00002/TRE2011-00010/TRE2011-00014—TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER (Id,Xu/Name Reference) AMENDED NOTICE City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof, on July 22, 2011,and deposited in the United States Mail on July 22,2011,postage prepaid. ` db I ( 1-' (Person that r red Notice) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Cy 4€4 day �- tvh. e Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the da of S P O y , 2011. . - OFFICIAL SEAL KRISTIE J MERMAN l I NOTARY PUBLIC -OREGON / COMMISSION NO. 459737 NT(ONNISSION EXPIRES)91121,2115 r/ NOTA Y PUBLIC F OREGON My Commission Expires: 2 o EXHIBIT_A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2011-00002 1111 191 TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER TIGARD 120 DAYS = 10/6/2011 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2011-00002 Tree Removal Permit(TRE) TRE2011-00010 Tree Removal Permit(TRE) TRE2011-00014 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two existing, multi-tenant, industrial buildings. In addition the applicant is requesting removal of two trees within lightly limit significant habitat area. There is a wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area, but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. APPLICANT: VLMK Consulting Engineers OWNER: Tigard Distribution Center LLC Jennifer Kimura c/o Deering Management Group 3993 SW Kelly Ave. 4800 SW Macadam Ave, Suite 120 Portland, OR 97239 Portland, OR 97239 LOCATION: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Rd.;WCTM 2S101BD,Tax Lot 200. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few,if any,nuisance characteristics such as noise,glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 22, 2011 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 6, 2011 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Areal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the otice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 5, 2011. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner at (503) 718-2437, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. 7', • .�y I VICINITY MAP II lt„'- ' v:... �- U I ' p SDR2011.00002 f,r I I M TRE2011-00010 �� 4 } 1 a I ' I =P11 I TRE201100014 TIGARD DISTRIBUTION BUTION� ` '1! \ mini !1") t k in 1 j' tiubICCl Site 11 I V I r ).m i l 4i �• i f, I 7, / ;,_ ry � � I '1,„„/ s:7....y.;7... it i\\\\ , _: , ITH-- - I � � er( L ,v �. + g v.\, ,x .,,, ,,,c.4. 4:IL ). N'‘ \ -'''-'1 '''-' -t' s. R4.-.....7,- y.g4G . ...., iii, __.....-477 CITY OF TIGARD -__ 1 I Aciwovad tX ; j onaHy Approved J Fa Orly Sho wmslcn�d �Abe� �p I pERMR N0. ' I g See Letter to:Fellow t i I I a YO AdCC4ei• j it- i4x'` i_- , i AC ..,:.i._ i_;. ' �' e lull'-. •- 7 as �ti •J f ' ;. f .,°,7"r ,mx-1.:u'is"Era_s'-- u 1iJomm „.• /�/J J wZT...1 C tj=�.y.,a 0.,ter . _' __ '''.1-1 - _.-- ' .. n�,�:.,..,, _ - -..,. Fs 7 yc.I�a ✓d/ 64�TJZ ^ ssc>_�.. 411 z i- _. _ -- - Hr,� .. -oz. -=-- o • 2101 BR O,CA°°,°° EXHIBIT. AK K FLORIDA IDA OUTDOOR INC FIEL F W REVOCABLE LIVING BY CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR 1149 VENPORT 715 NE EVERETT ST P TLAND, 97201 PORTLAND,OR 97232 2S101BD00104 �101DB00300 CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR FIE •S,F- •W REVOCABLE LIVING 715 NE EVERETT ST 114• - •AVENPORT PORTLAND,OR 97232 -••TLAND, •' 97201 ' 101BD0010. 2S101CA00700 CL ' C. INEL OUTDOOR GOULD FAMILY PROPERTIES VI LLC 715 . •. -ETT ST BY TURRETT STEEL INDUSTRIES INC PORTLAND, i'R 97232 527 ATANDO AVE CHARLOTTE,NC 28206 S101BD00103 2S101CB00100 CL R C EL OUTDOOR HUTTIG,INC 715 RETT ST 555 MARVILLE CENTER DR RTLAND, R 97232 PO BOX 1041 CHESTERFIELD,MO 63006 2S101BB01201 2S101BC00101 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION KNEZ REALTY GROUP LLC PROPERTY TAX DEPT 111 12301 SE HWY 212 999 LAKE DR CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 101BA00200 2S101BC00100 CO 0 WH ESALE CORPORATION KNEZ,JOHN S SR&JEANNE M PROPE AX DEPT 111 12301 SW HWY 212 999 E DR CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 AQUAH,WA 98027 2S101BD00200 2S101BA00101 CVG OREGON LLC PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES LP 7800 WALTON PKWY 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 NEW ALBANY,OH 43054 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S101AB02700 2S101BD00300 EAGLE HARDWARE&GARDEN, INC PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING GROUP IN ATTN TAX DEPT(TA3) 16400 COLLEGE BLVD PO BOX 1111 LENEXA,KS 66219 NORTH WILKESBORO,NC 28656 2S101BD00301 2S101CA00400 EAST SIDE VAN&STORAGE, INC RUSSELL FAMILY LIVING TRUST 4836 SE POWELL BLVD DAWN NEW HUNZIKER LLC PORTLAND,OR 97206 WELLS APARTMENTS LLC ET AL EAST WENATCHEE,WA 98802 2S1010001100 2S101AB01500 FIELDS,FRED W REVOCABLE LIVING SJP LLC 1149 SW DAVENPORT 7615 SW BEVELAND RD PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 101BD0030 TIG• '■ OF 131 • • L ARD,OR 9 223 2S101CA00200 WALL STREET INDUSTRIAL LLC A RICHARD VIAL EXECUTIVE CENTER LLC 7000 SW VARNS ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101BB01400 WALTON CWOR PARK BC 8 LLC BY CTMT-WALTON RE TAX 4678 WORLD PARKWAY CIR ST LOUIS,MO 63134 2S101AC01900 WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.23 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC00103 WETLANDS CONSERVANCY INC PO BOX 1195 TUALATIN,OR 97062 Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design Group PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Susan Beilke 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci Dayle D. & Evelyn 0. Beach 11285 SW 78th Avenue 11530 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Shannen Williams Rappold Norris Beggs & Simpson Marketing/Business Development Manager Perlo Construction 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 7190 SW Sandburg Street Portland, OR 97204 Portland, OR 97223 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED. 13-Dec-10 RECEIVLJ PRE-APP.HELD BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION LAND USE PE o' �► TION City of Tigard Permit Center 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 I (OAK C) Phone: 503.639.4171 Fax:503.598.1960 File M a01l-L0UO, -- Other Case# Pe O(r•O03/0 I/4 ( B. S.-rte rgasob �1 Date By I f. Receipt# I Fee I Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance(I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change(III) ❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑ Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑Conditional Use(III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review(I,II or III) ❑Development Code Amendment(IV) ❑ Historic Overlay(II or III) ® Site Development Review(II) ❑Home Occupation(H) ❑Subdivision(II or III) LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY WILL OCCUR(Address if available) 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road TAX MAPS&TAX LOT NOS. 2S101 BD00200 TOTAL SITE SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICATION Approximately 6.4 acres Light Industrial I I-L ■ APPLICANT; VLMK Consulting Engineers MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 3933 SW Kelly Avenue Portland Oregon 97239 PHONE NO. FAX NO. 503.222.4453 503.248.9263 PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO. Jennifer Kimura PRUP1=R"1'Y AVINI II()I.DF.R(.Attach list It more than one) Karl Klokke MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 1109 North 21st Street Boise Idaho 83702 PHONE NO. FAX NO. 208.377.3099 208.939.6508 *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. mom PROPOSALS( \I\I.\R\ PI,t.,Ii, ) The owner is proposing to expand the parking lots on both the north and south ends of the existing building. In addition,some of the existing parking areas will be updated to meet the current city code standards.The entry at the south end of Bldg B will be remodeled and will also include upgrades of the south elevation. APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE"BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS"INFORMATION SHEET. is\curpin\masters\land use applications\other land use applications.doc THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. 4 1z, II Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date ; City of Tigard RECEIVED Tree Removal MAY 1 7 2011 T I G A R D Type I Application CITY OF TIGARD P LA N N I M3/E NG INEERINC GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address/Location: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 2S101 BD00200 Case No.(s):11 GA)1('t7ev i Other Case No.(s): i I('0000 Receipt No.: i8?5? _ Site Size: Approximately 6.4 acres Application Accepted By: 3 ' 1V1 Date: 07/U Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Karl Klokke Address: 1109 North 21st Street Phone: 208.377.3099 Boise, ID Date Determined To Be Complete: City, Zip: 83702 Applicant*: VLMK Consulting Engineers Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: 3933 SW Kelly Ave Phone: 503.222.4453 Rev.7/1/10 is\curpin\masters\land use applications\tree removal permit app.doc City: Portland, Oregon Zip: 97239 *When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. ✓ Application Elements Submitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY ❑ Application Form ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request a Tree Removal Permit ❑ to allow(please be specific,include exact location,etc.): Title Transfer Instrument or Deed ❑ Site/Plot Plan Proposal to to remove existing trees in north and south parking ❑ Site/Plot Plan(rcduccd 81/2"x 11") lots as well (3)trees from existing parking between the buildings. ❑ Applicant's Statement(Address dress criteria under 18.790.050(A)Tigard Development Code) See site plan and arborist report. ❑ Filing Fee S294.00 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2 List any VARIANCE,CONDITIONAL USE,SENSITIVE LANDS,OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete,you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained,upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 12 f h day of k p f-I l ,20 , � , / II I id _ L4.J,- 4 0 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 2 CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT c g 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 182525 - 05/18/2011 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID TRE2011-00010 Tree Removal 1003100-43116 $256.00 TRE2011-00010 Tree Removal-LRP 1003100-43117 $38.00 Total: $294.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 003057 STREAT 05/18/2011 $294.00 Payor: Deering Management Group Inc Total Payments: $294.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT 11 s 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 182526 - 05/18/2011 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID SDR2011-00002 SDR Under$1,000,000 1003100-43116 $4,048.00 SDR2011-00002 SDR Under$1,000,000-LRP 1003100-43117 $597.00 Total: $4,645.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 003057 STREAT 05/18/2011 $4,645.00 Payor: Deering Management Group, Inc Total Payments: $4,645.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 UPI CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT a • 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 182769 - 06/08/2011 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID TRE2011-00014 Tree Removal 1003100-43116 $256.00 TRE2011-00014 Tree Removal-LRP 1003100-43117 $38.00 Total: $294.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 003033 KPEERMAN 06/08/2011 $294.00 Payor: DEERING MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. Total Payments: $294.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 Title Di Ic rma-Eion JJ TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT TITLE PLANT 1629 SW Salmon •Portland OR 97205 (503)224-0550 • FAX:(503)219-2212 October 14, 2008 Tigard Distribution LLC c/o Deering Management Group 4800 SW Macadam Avenue, Ste 120 Portland OR 97239 Order Number: 3626006461 Regarding: The Tigard Distribution Center, LLC Property Address: 8001 SW Hunziker Street Tigard, OR 97223 County: Washington DATED AS OF: October 8, 2008, 8:00 am PROPERTY We have searched our Tract Indices as to the following described real property: See Attached Legal Description. VESTING THE TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER, LLC, AN OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED INFORMATION Said property is subject to the following on record matter(s): 1. Property taxes UNPAID Tax Year: 2008-09 Unpaid Amount: $55,112.65, unpaid plus interest Tax Acct Number: R458686, 2S11 BD-00200, Code 023.74 2. Tigard city lien(s), if any. 3. Rights of the public in and to that portion lying within streets, roads and highways. 4. Access restrictions in Deed, including the terms and provisions thereof. From: Edward C. Hunziker and Babette Hunziker, husband and wife STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT(TO) 1 To: State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission Recorded Date: March 30, 1985 Recording Number: Book 546 page 361 County: Washington 5. Agreement as set out in Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, From: Edward C. Hunziker and Babette Hunziker To: D.H. Overmeyer Warehouse Co., an Oregon corporation Recorded Date: October 27, 1965 Recording Number: Book 575 page 40 6. Agreement as set out in Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, From: Edward C. Hunziker and Babette Hunziker To: D.H. Overmeyer Warehouse Co., an Oregon corporation Recorded Date: October 27, 1965 Recording Number: Book 575 page 43 7. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, From: William A. Hunnell and Charlotte Munnell To: Portland General Electric Company, an Oregon corporation Recorded Date: September 16, 1971 Recording Number: Book 835 page 510 For: Electric power line Affects: South 10 feet of said parcel and Easterly portion 8. Easement as granted in Street Dedication and Slope Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, From: Klokke Corporation, Inc. To: City of Tigard Recorded Date: December 2, 1975 Recording Number: Book 1056 page 760 For: Slopes, cuts and fills 9. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, From: H.G.M. Co., a corporation To: Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Delaware corporation Recorded Date: September 3, 1980 Recording Number: 80030642 10. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, From: Klokke Corporation To: Portland General Electric Company, an Oregon corporation Recorded Date: August 9, 1984 Recording Number: 84031391 For: Electric power lines Affects: North and West lot lines 11. Memorandum of Assignment of Agreements, including the terms and provisions thereof, Between: Mission Packaging, Ltd., Mission Packaging, Inc. And: Federal Business Development Bank Recorded Date: September 15, 1993 Recording Number: 93075553 12. Memorandum of Assignment of Agreements, including the terms and provisions thereof, Between: Alberta Mining Corporation Limited STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT(T12) 2 And. Federal Business Development Bank Recorded Date: March 16, 1994 Recording Number: 94025425 13. Memorandum of Assignment of Agreements, including the terms and provisions thereof, Between: Mission Packaging, Inc. And: Alberta Mining Corporation Limited Recorded Date: March 15, 1994 Recording Number: 94025426 14. Memorandum of Assignment of Agreements, including the terms and provisions thereof, Between: Mission Packaging, Inc. And: Federal Business Development Bank Recorded Date: March 16, 1994 Recording Number: 94025427 15. Deed of Trust, including the terms and provisions thereof, given to secure a note, Amount: $2,000,000.00 Executed By: Klokke Corporation, a California corporation Trustee: Ticor Title insurance Company Beneficiary: Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association Dated: June 25, 1999 Recorded Date: July 6, 1999 Recording Number: 99080432, modified December 22, 2003 as Fee 2003-208286; modified December 3, 2004 as Fee 2004-138307; modified January 24, 2006 as Fee 2006-008520; modified December 27, 2006 as Fee 2006-151692 and modified December 27, 2007 as Fee 2007-132824 THIS REPORT IS TO BE UTILIZED FOR INFORMATION ONLY. Any use of this report as a basis for transferring, encumbering or foreclosing the real property described will require payment in an amount equivalent to applicable title insurance premium as required by the rating schedule on file with the Oregon Insurance Division. The liability for TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY is limited to the addressee and shall not exceed the premium paid hereunder. TICORTITLLIE INS, RANCE COMPANY ,./ STATUS OF RECORD TIRE REPORT(TI2) 3 A parcel of land situated in the Graham D.L.C. No. 39 in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. Said parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Graham D.L.C.; thence North 82° 50' 00" West along the North boundary of said Graham D.L.C., a distance of 1752.30 feet (as described in that'deed recorded September 1, 1959 in Book 421, Page 746, Washington County Deed Records) to a point; thence leaving said North line South 08° 22' 22" West along the East boundary of said Book 421, Page 746 Deed, a distance of 210.66 feet to a point; thence leaving said Easterly boundary South 81° 37' 38" East at right angles to said East boundary a distance of 25.00 feet to the Northwesterly corner of that certain tract conveyed to D.H. Overmeyer Warehouse Co., by deed dated April 7, 1965, recorded April 13, 1965 in Book 548, Page 414, Washington County Deed Records, which is the true point of beginning of the parcel of land herein described; thence continuing at right angles to said East boundary, South 81° 37' 38" East along the North line of said Overmeyer tract a distance of 182.48 feet to a point on the Southwesterly boundary of the Oregon State Highway No. 217; thence South 34° 18' 31" East, along said Southwesterly boundary of said Highway, a distance of 7.18 feet to a 5/8" iron rod that is 110 feet right of Engineers Centerline Station 427+00; thence continuing along said Southwesterly boundary, South 33° 56' 33" East a distance of 167.34 feet to a point which is the most Easterly Northeast corner of said Overmeyer tract; thence leaving said Southwesterly boundary, South 08° 22' 22" West, parallel to said East boundary of said Book 421, Page 746 Deed, and following the East line of said Overmeyer Tract, a distance of 891.19 feet to a point on the Northeasterly boundary of SW Hunziker Street (County Road No. 34), said road being 60 feet in width; thence along said Northeasterly boundary along a 170.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 06° 21' 10", an arc distance of 18.85 feet (the long chord bears North 63° 59' 25", West a distance of 18.84 feet) to a point of tangency; thence continuing along said Northeasterly boundary, North 60° 48' 50" West a distance of 301.74 feet to a point that is 25.00 feet Easterly of, when measured at right angles, the said East boundary of said Book 421, Page 746 Deed, said point is also located on the West line of said Overmeyer Tract; thence leaving said Northeasterly boundary of said Hunziker Street, North 08° 22' 22" East parallel to and 25 feet Easterly of, when measured at right angles, said East boundary of said Book 421, Page 746 Deed, and following the West line of the Overmeyer Tract, a distance of 907.28 feet to the true point of beginning of the parcel of land herein described. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1629 SW Salmon Portland,OR 97205 . TICOR TITLE INSURANCE and the Company n „if any, in dn CE This map is made solely for the purpose an of dimensions in and locating said premises assumes no liability for variations, location ascertained by cctual777../.......:.?..;:........,......\.4 \ - V -.. .A., %-fX:". X..' ..'-...'-../.-...--,.:••.; * ' . '' ' ' ' ''.. ..-'''''''-'7. 71"7'::-:''''CA \ '''':''"-:'.''': '''' x- •A -'";'`v"-..--,..•:‘. i ,, .' I: " '':•:/ :- .- ,?•4."%e'l ("x .z"...;•'.4.4'..X.' ., \ /" :(.."'..-:::.?:,%?`-/':.:.7• '',...: ....',:x.:,>.,,>, -./....,,K,,-:.:.. 302 i \ \v...,. nu. -— ' ''-'ot• ',.9.'.b. "414,14;v410;1,:' :,s.-:...w. Y.,./.2.,....".,'\. ;.: .-::: 1.:y .:.,:.: : .. .;;;. \ 7 .2.1,..m..--,...., ,...,..:,.:...z. ''''' 7.'... . Norrrhi.;,7,7* ".•■•• ...„>:■ .' ,4^ : /• ...>:.•:. ).:/..?:'•■*' " •:‘X::''. >' ' i GRAJW*014, ./.- ...2f.......X (.': :•..'' ): ':,•:'‘..:'‘....t >: alai I S'i,. \ :'• . • '. ...:..V::.:•••:: 's '2' .• { • :f: / \ ■••■.- ,..,.•:. ,.e*■,. ...g„.\„.''../:,...',..''X.:".■l'■••:.'.•,•'-'-''-r:... tie Ac : *. .7. •:./5`..X":"-:'.-:r;,.:‘`,.,'"I.V'e,.%):"sx.s:',"::•,,:'' ....4:. •X ''' " 111,;.:.. / /r sr .... \..,-••••• \ 1 7,, 11;•••:::::::':::<);.':••)'/:',/;-:..):.'S':.:..".-X--',,,:,„:%„%ts. 1 1 \ \ UUK'..1..Y.Iv.',;`:;A: :':,24:,:%-;\/"AA %.:"..", :••'• .".1...?• i l';'•.,.''' 1/ 2 VS I I \ \ \)a I-k .: .%.• :.; /.. :‘,.'...^...\...%;• -' '• ' +.: •.: ;c, 4 It 1 .. "'-'.;/\•:'.••...'%':'>t"r: :':X K.''''••Itl\t'ee ' ‘41,41' />1--:;%::::;:j..:::\".sle.‘,..;X:./.. "....S..."-..'t.,i's '• t \ i -• .-. r .• .-, ... le .77:.:1':-..,,m_::•-/•,:":;;X'.•;;Ce.:..X..:t>:‘‘,*-<:,r-f?'::::`.,." 1 I • \\\' .•'''',--..r---`,7;2!.:-..!: :'. :•::•". ,•t. :4.,,,`../..0. • .:•• ,.. . s:.....g: 7,.;,:t.,..',..,.../•:,-':„,..",•.:.');, 1, 1 1 I I 0 \ . •,.. 1 ::::.;•., '...,:f-,?Isie*,...,••.;e..,:_,-•:::": ,':, v•s....,: :, 2 ...•,:':7'........;4,:,•A:,:!:,-4,7:-..">,',!gcvp.'..4:4; 4" ),-,,F. u ,........ i i 1.,,, ,c) \ •-,..- '::: .1:: / \ -51 N .• • .... ' o"... s'... . , . • .. 1 7- lk... ....,...-..-......ui.4414...4.u. .--...)-41,,. di 1/1 r . t -, ......„...:: ,.. ..........",‹-:::....y.,.1/4. .r....,.....-,:-I)i: r :,• -14 .)-c .:,::1,-. i f/ r • ' .3, \'..x..--.,..:%,-f , :I's,:..: €:...r. '" I l / I •"-..,-."'...\.e:-*;:"':.<x nc.,/ .."..,.:•,\...•);... ..; 4.4 . / 1 .: ''''. ': '.': •': ;": 4 4.--,?;7'.:.':-: %-::11, --. I ...a. r 1 \ .1'..:.'`'...:;. :117/,‘r,:,,,,,,,..:':,:fi'.::. me I• -,t, 14 m I I \ $)••■, . .-%;:.. ?,v4)::11;:,.2%(,,,:;<,i<...' i q .l'' ,.,"• • •,•1;,' ', .' ,,:'.- - • "X›t:,Ic.4 '!,- / i i 4- ItZ\ • i 4.---__________ftp• 108 / I T*14 \ s i .../•'''::I.S:::<>(....% 39tair I 23—1, 4 ., .,,...- .., .. .... . „ ....,. , / 1 4.- .--•:.:-x,...-:.i.-:.,•-.-...:.4..,:-.:K..y.;;A, ,. 1!".„i p." :::-;,.:::::,'''''.::::::::::::;41:::1::::::?;:).55.::<>::::.4.V.•• . sZittpc.: ''/ .• • .. •- - • .".' 'V 71 5: .1, — 4 ..„2.:::/;(%■:**:-•':....:: ,. .,, ?y: ,..N. b.*:'■., #)''',..„ es•II 105 157 AC I.'.:•:\ 1C5-Al , .1^." ' <: .,, )::::ic>:5;:.:5::':,7•:";.?:,''f:K.:<::4. '' ..../• ./...:/‘:',,, ,/.>:'.;.::>::>::::(..)ceKt)::tX)::%:".X..X'1..>:•;1%7 ''s■-%45.5 I ,i 1 .,,..... :‘...........'':*:'::Vr::':-:':::'::::<:11::'`...:.:.:X.•:.:4"•,1%.; :.:...'„..:„.‘,..t:>. 444F,, lilt ,ri..,-.:.:. -.. . ; :------_. .,.....--:.:,:,.,--.•:-...-"./.... ,.\- ,...-:.: ,:-. ...-. : y............,....,:. , ,. .....,. .. • . •.... \,..t .,. , , , ,...„ -.s..... ....- .....:',/ -,-..,-. .:s.,,x,.,,...--,.,, ..s., ..... ,,,.. .• ..., .. .. , - - . : -..:‘,.,„.:-.„.....,, ---..v44:---.-,..,,, •-•:,:,-:„.... .-:,......-.":„..--..„:::::::::.::::::::.,......,..,-,,,•,::,-;,::::,,,.:-...,::: „ . . •. . • ...2 z,.."...,..--;)". .-/.--K,...--:.:".-":.:. • x >c.x..:...„,,..,-.,-..:.:-...: :::::4:::,..:..,„ ......,-.:,- :,."......:.......„..:.....::.-‘.:,../v.'.,.. ,-:.:;-,•.?...:.::.';x:'.. z :::.,”-:.,...,.•:.•....•.....•-..-....-;'...:•':.•:-')../.-:.:• ..<...• ..:..••:.,...:./::..',:..,-:.:,":,.,.>:....':.:;.::,:.„...„,:.:.-%::•:.:,..e:..>-•:::...:...::..;',..........::.:,.....,:.▪..-...x:-..-• ,-y...:...-..-:......:.::.::.,,s.:'.::,,..;.•......-2..•,•...::,,-..:...:":.:..-x t-,-..,...;..„.,.r..".,.;• :.-„,• ..-. „:....,::...-..:...:..,....,..".,.:...;./..,....:...,.....:..„.,.....A..„....:„2.-,,..,-..%...,,,:..-,,,....:....,•.,.,.-.,.::...,.:::„.::.,..7.:.;;,7.......•,.-..y,:...-,.-,....,. , ,. , - , „ , . .. „:, , „ , ,... ,„ „ , / / / - , - , „,, „ . . , / . ,, x y , . „,, , , , y :: - : . . „ , e . " 3 ,‘,:: f ;. „ <.• ..;..: : ..;.: :: . :„ , , . :. .,, ,: : .. : / :.: .. ... ,: r . , , , . . . ?, , , , , .e . . 'it „ ,. , . „ / . iR,..,...1.,.:: rs.-.,, vial :I% ••.wC'n • ` File No. 37275 ,'zYY r k'tie WARRANTY DEED -r, -' I (Individual) ∎x`?..,.7..r..", .'° - Zil film IV (L je ft rf'zflYC , That.... Edwa.p, C. Hunziker and_ t� ' Babette Hunziker, husband and wife; ` let ,,grantor__, for the consideration of ;',:.: r +, . :s?' . the sum of,......Fifty.Nine Thousand Six Hundred and No/100 459,600.00) ;t F - - - -DOLLARS at" 4;„i ;` + ts..K.,S" paid,have b rgained and sold and by these presents do bargain,self and convey;: L„p `• ' unto the STATE OF OREGON,by and through its STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION,the following described ` - premises,to wit: '`: ' t• A parcel of land lying ;:1,4:.,.;:.-aF- w• • e , pr= j P ying in the W. i1, Graham O.1,C, #39, Township 2 w •.,,_.• it.w,,. rss:.r �-: South, Range I West, W. M., Washington County, Oregon, and being a portion 3‘ t : F �, , of that property described in that certain deed to Edward C. and Babette ;'rtr. ), Hunziker, recorded in Book 165, Page 35 of Washington County Record of g 3 g - Y N•.7 A.• Deeds; the said parcel being that portion of said property included in �” ^S1• ;;=• :Y ��', a _grip of land variable in width, lying on each side of the center line •ze— s ,n of the Beaverton-Tigard Highway as said highway has been relocated, which 211 'i ypl center line in described as follows; a--- ` 6cgi,u:ing at Engineer's center line Station 399+44.35, said Station ... ..1.. ,, ,1 b• eing 467.83 feet North and 788.48 feet East of the Southwest corner of c :J 1', the Thomas Stott D.L.C. #53, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, W. M..; thence yfr q'i ,41. on a spiral curve right (the long chord of which bears South 42° 22' 20" ,< . ..-. } w , �- ;y E• ast) 400 feet; thence on a 3819.72 foot radius curve right the long .TX 4' !w x_- ' : chord of which bears South 39° 01' 10" East) 135.93 feet; thence on a f ' Wi spiral curve right (the long chord of which bears South 35' 00' East) .� • ' y 000 feat to Engineer's Station 410+80.28 hark = 1,11+00.97 ahead; thence " "` South v r!e 33° 30' East, 2074,89 feet; thence on a spiral curve left (the e>< "e - long chord of which -Dears South 35° 10' East) 500 feet; thence on a ``'a`- - 2864.79 foot radius curve left (the long chord of which bears South 42° ..fc. 15' East) 375 feet; thence on a spiral curve left (the long chord of . , - [:,',y""•' which bears South 49° 20' East) 500 feet; thence South 51° CO' East, A-',4r;-.' mss• Y. s' `^ 139.52 feet.; thence on a spiral curve right (the long chord of which '' t �" bears South 49° 00' East) 600 feet; thence on a 2864.79 foot radius .,co-.,co- i �dli curve right (the long chord of which hears South 41' 16' 45" East) ,• ( "° _,04 372.08 feet; t;Jence on a spiral curve right (the aortg chord of which 2*' ;;' f-' bear_ South 33° 33, 30" East) 600 feet; thence South 31° :ta..a.• j 538.93 feet; thence on a spiral curve left (the long chord of which bears l'gl50101 South 34' 53' 30" East) 200 feet; thence on a 572,94 foot radius curve w. left (the long chord of which bears-South 60° 09' 30" East) 372 feet; t"g- ? ' p �,,,1 thence on a spiral curve left (the long chord of which bears South 85' 25' S UN -r-�a, 30" East) 200 feet.; thence South 88" 45 30" East, 58.34 reet to Engineer's MA .. Nf'; �' Station 476'31.73 which Stat'on _ Engineer's Station 96'-45,28 on the center tnakk I- line of the relocated Pr.^l Cie Highway, .La t"'- 1 • .•b1 ' z . ,'• The widths in feet of the :tr_ of land above referred are as �• ,,!? ",,,yy--_'+��'�' follows, p ,Fe""'•..•_g— gam+ -,,,i to Station tc Station Width on Northeasterly Width on Southwesterly _oF •e• _-«y side of center line side of center lire` 422400 427,00 90 110 »`r. 427+00 t^'•' 436°'75.86 90 in a etralght line 110 n s atrai rt ;r r., Q si.a,; to 105 ,ine to ]40 d -' tJ�t - - -- ;eK-• It ttt 436+75.86 440450.86 105 in a straight line 140 in a straight Pto 1]5 line to 120 l'> , ud tc� Ly., (Bearings used herein are based upon the Oregon Co-ordinate System, . (.:;,, +'°: Wit- North Zone ' The parcel of land to which this descrip'r,ion applies contains 5,2 �,i'' ..; pp1 acres. 1, - �f - ' -4 50OY 54G f rr_ 11 p w y x S �.,1�+j•a..-t$t,_'?Y'4'i'+,t,�f.�.' _ ."+ ,'+��S�j' 4 ti a.,.r/f�a•e'ms t s t" •'+° r < Y ' .ki r -� T ,N• i,.;. ;: • T 1 z I c i r wa I asi" 6 y+•f'??-Vir k < ,i4k. �.PR.l l k,�siA tq` .}a r i '}s ,°��,5� F>r � 41w:44�t C y ,i s Z;t r.- � x c° ; G'F� :: s � i 1:J%i bi �'e R 7 R .•TsV,rR ,L . - < ,e 5 - 41,;c-4 + 1� .' � . •• er J -to.- ,• !,S, ., S .t"r a , i 'i,,.41. ,,, p +. .,,,, z a X.7.s `1 x;t .,.- e i,,,a * 1•i ! •. v Ld v'4 ,,• a l; .} w�,' 14 Nr• z n� •eft A. r .'eA rt rr • JFi,.=,4,.. -�?;it,,w:2` ; a. +z �>, �{! �� ` _t i,.„.xt�,-•.fi• ei n`• -,,,.`:� -�-; f'rY,.�� .,..,_ S I F t� ii.aa. -' i ;;:.:.,11,;?..' r.h st'; k , r.--;.1.1.:74!...:'' r ,}• '-•1.,'''''• .'' .• ?Jr .1. ,....:" yMAf r (1Zti. lJ, J' Y.'?l..;;,,',•,-a.,....,,t-, . Yn vr, M1•tIk'ssx,+":, r.i - K:4; }.• �-•--;,+ i=:7r'- '?r'. As a part of the consideration hereinabove stated, there is also bargained, ''..-.;;Al. sold, conveyed and relinquished to the Grantee all existing, future or potential ;{;; L'.41* common law or statutory abutter's easements of access between the ` '�: _,,t,i rY parcel herein : �,::;i described and all of the Grantors' remaining real property„ �a ^h o, It is expressly intended that these covenants, burdens, restrictions and i•:trw,r. `; reservations shall run with the land and shall forever bind the Grantors their t' - '} •' -' heirs and assigns. Yi: , s. a_ y 0. :,6,:.:f r w/T 1 •u MY�.ep u i;'-j *.4•11' at:�. „';•,,.. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises with their appurtenances, in fee simple, unto the said •'"`'a�,.'-• State of Oregon,by and through its State Highway Commission,its successors and assigns forever. -'-`' , mod" gii ii.,-. 0::::::4", And.........T 5..........the said grantors do hereby covenant to and with the said State of Oregon,by and err.' through its State Highway Commission, its successors and ossigns,that we are the owner.... s:i in fee simple of said premises;that they are free from all encumbrances s. :,r '4. and t hat __ 1vI0t__....._..._.. will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever, .,,..::ry• ~ hands..,and seal... M -';�: IN WITNESS WHEIi1£Or, >ae.........__._have hereunto set_...___cus ••- i ,..,. "i- •....... 22../4.,-cw`_."................ .fi5 .,.�: . this day of. 18_ —' Done in presence of: • 'ka ". ..._ __._._"_.._ .. ._..........._..... . _ _ ___" . ``. qtr rs a:� G°..�a.L.ar?i/ 2[ •l 'tr; ..., • tA. 1 .......... - -. 'c. .ii.6arg- frrK.t..r.V2.4. -1..-.., [SEAL] .M y ! ! 1 s ? S1 or " L rFrr Mill c.in 11 n co Q yo l I # I� ei ilr ff f a g r : !I '.'rSt as I n m n y°z• D* 411:x••1•.1 +� yz C ,� 5 5v_.:. o y aa 4°, I s :•� V w fc. Vic ? x .,-,• y �j. C.1: ! w w p s 1,..L c�1•i a: b CJ•y:til `�\" iI PO y {r1 4 O -:J '.,•ec.�. ',.: �d o', ; .: F':'},t'•H .. �! g I rn 3 s+ 5=st-a - yet `;.,' 1e ' STATE OF OREGON, c';-te, ;4-�•}: On this._.23 day of N.1 74..4:(i....... _.,19.6S,personally came before me, 'rr .;g;J a Notary Public in and for said county and state,the within named ...".._.............."_._-........_..............._._..___"...... e �' Edward C. Hunziker be ''3a::; ; - ...•_." �..._..._.and...__...._.@j4 X54.H?1di3�ISR�.." .....,.....".,."... ..,his wife, i»v ,d-4 j. to ma nQesoiially,jenown to be the Identical persons.. described in and who executed the within instrument, • t"",'k�` .,ig :f and.evhti cache pelsbe UUy acknowledged to me that t.he.y.exacuted,the same freely and voluntarily for the uses •-s"•",- J_ . andrpurposes then u;.itarned. "arc.-y^r• Witness myh6iif7 and official seal the day and year last above written. ti• ;+ twtaw TMwmwine :,e-4 My commission expires(.[,1 f,.2 s__/27 a ", .,_ h;z} ::.o qq a;'rTi-.4! :r; - 54fi 362 -; ,.:,t. -.....-st•.. : mh am?"-. v :�'^y:.•.�°�Z. 1 • p''?.. .0 •6 `+.: . :41.. �p.t..J. • , '.•'r:f . t . c s L ,Jn ` ° .+u..v ; a 4 '45Z;, l"e S� / .w4 : . ♦.r,4,:.4 V �sA:4.,iRy •.' __it i ' kt y4 ,r� -; r ) r . •t } h y3.r f tair... . „ S "" .".n`•. •t t v ,�, r'" •,•ir i.,..-'4,71:4;.3,-4-l ,1 a .,74 � h .M{r•A 1 , �i? a; •••'r +r 3 -F„i Z !t CL F� ,. � ^#.s � .�•N t {r ' 9 1 . . $� �� tt /”i ,;i1.. f Z Y,,1�.,� t •.f•- £,a i`h, . '•. _. t •.. P.�ps^e 6ti 9 t' t... .1-. P.o ,3 . ..r .. 2- y•i`l�t{. -t r te i,c tF ':v. -';rk [Y e':• -:- t i rz1 i r •-t,. -xti a.... . r R ;'•^ ..:- ` -?"�v.4X,`:+t i„.;,. . -......4242 :�: .��;'i..-fi= d.„ .'?.�-'�.2 xr<".ig S^:r.i-.* _•`.•:. �.1 ' 9075 ` E A S E M E N T.. • THIS INDENTURE, made this u' day of 6 c-tf 7 ..V, 1965, between EDWARD C. HUNZIKER and BABETTE HUNZIKER, husband tl`. and wife, Grantors, and D. H. OVERMYER WAREHOUSE CO., an Oregon - corporation, Grantee, „I,::i W I T N E S S E T H : : For the sum of One Dollar and other good and valuable considerations to them paid, the receipt of which is hereby • acknowledged, Grantors grant unto Grantee, its successors and ia- - • : assigns, a perpetual easement and right-of-gay for the purpose • imm .... ,7.f -_ Nil f conotr :tang, improving, Lying, operating and.maintaining a `~ sa railroad spur track over cnd'acrose a strip of land approxi- * mately 180 feet long and 18 feet wide, situated in the County `= of Washington, State of Oregon, described as follows: • Beginning at a point in the northerly right- • of-way line of Hunziker Street which point is '--,- the southeastern corner of that certain tract -.t conveyed to D. H. Overmyer Warehouse Co., an. Oregon corporation, by deed dated the'7(th day. of April, 19;5, rocorded in Book 548 at page 414 of Deed Records, herein called the Overmyer ••tract, said:point being the true point of begin- . ninr of the hereinafter-described property; thence northerly along the easterly line of said Overmyer • tract a distance of 180 feet; thence easterly and parallel to the northerly line of Hunziker Street a distance 'ef 13 feet; thence southerly and parallel to the easterly line of said Overmyer • tract a distance of. approximately 180 feet to the point of intersection with the northerly - right-of-way line of Hunziker Street; thence westerly along the northerly right-of-way line = of Hunziker Street a distance of approximately 18 feet to the point of beginning. .-='..:,.=:?- The easement and right-of-way herein granted is made L� to permit Grantee to connect a spur track facility from the • main line of the Southern Pacific Company to Grantee's ware- . •• house located en the Overmyer tract and this grant is accepted • by grantee in fulfillment of all grantors' obligations to grantee_,;_, heretofore in anywi.:e arising. /, p 1Z . • - '. aoox 575 P �4.1 h, , _ _ 9075 e-,e The rights, privileges and authorities herein granted are subject to the following terms and conditions: ,, 1. If Grantee elects to construct said spur track, L :. Grantee shall from and after the construction thereof pay all ee, taxes upon the right-of-way strip and track improvements -thereon ; except as provided in paragraph 3 below. 2. Grantors reserve the right to cross under said eaee- ment and right-of-way for sewage disposal and water drainage' purposes. 3. Grantors reserve the privilege hereafter to construct III additional spur facilities connecting to the spur which Grantee may elect to construct, for the � �- purpose of serving businesses ';::; on adjacent property owned by Grantors. In such event, the 7-.,4 person or persons who construct and use such connecting spurs s: will ehereupon become obligated for a proportionate share of the installation costs and of the taxes and maintenance expense of ..4...:: Grantee's main spur facility. - -.. ;:.; 4: in the event Grantee shall-not commence to construct .- = °`_ a spur track facility within 12-months from the data hereof or, - ese; if having constructed aaid •epur track facility; Grantee shall. ' MI i ; • thereafter at any time abandon the same, then in either such • event the above-described premises shall be free from this ease- • ENO ment as fully and as completely as if the same had not been made. .` In the event of such abandonment, Grantee, or its successors or assig;is, shall furnish to Grantore a quitclaim deed in standard form to evidence the fact of such abandonment and rel1nquicuient of rights hereunder. . Ill III IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have executed these pres- ents the day and year first above written. __ . r,u• . - ..--7/�• 7. . t. 10 S, - uQC` i7r_l o�rr �� — _ _ ,r. �r -i.' • 9O •`•,:.." STATE OF OREGON ";,..tr[ County of Wile hi.neton Personally appeared the above-named EDWARD C. • t�' HUId`Ll'KER and BABETTE P1NZI R, husband and wife, and ac- knowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary • act and deed. i ',T fit. r Notary Public for Oregon . : ' . • •��••''.•:. `RI commission expires LL•• �': r Nly pi� :" G 7��/6,g• la• • • is STATE Of 0 Ogton, _ 4 .. covntr o . k. c-i.Po,or,.ihym"sort•D4Ktor,of R�..vear and "... a F.aomao-'.gocnrdet•N a=t,.•:rM.•o=• . 4cr'c'hyp:nn h..-;r ;clellir to„ho akin �Q br F:+]:."a1S''-4:- .'inf nn-'.xoroei _ n: d'wrN�a wa. �i c • .. m twn^ .1---.4711.— . In boo d_________.gl:cor:.-f...:,..,':,,.,.....1.___Li; a •. Ra-.EA_mom o « Oa t7 3 of PH'61 • 3 • Book 575 PArF 42 4 -.,.. .-• _ ,•,. :•w.:eoa.+-sue+...ryono..�'�-yr......r4..- ..vc�.47Qaa...w.-warat'�rrv.+.w.v a mni74.s --�'.—swwwm. ■ 6 x. EASEMENT - 'i,•:; THIS INDENTURE, made this ,7a c/ day of ��:C ri,;_4 1965, between FRED W. FIELDS and SUZANNE FIELDS, husband and ` ' •.'.'rr; wife, and LAUREN H. NICHOLS and BYRL NICHOLS, husband and ...:-.- ; ';_ 17•.: wife, Grantors, and D. H. OVERMYER WAREHOUSE CC., an Oregon corporation, grantee. !:1 • W I T N L S S E T H: _ For the sum of One Dollar and other good and valuable i; considerations to them paid, the receipt of which is hereby i es; owledged, Grantors grant unto Grantee, its successors and Y!=C assigne, a perpetual easement and right of way for the purpose - - - of constructing, improving, using, operating and maintaining a _ .is " railroad spur t.-ack over and across the following described premises situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon: Beginning 20 chains North and 20 chains West of the - Southeast corner of the W. W. Graham DLC; thence _ West 17.11 chains to stake; thence North 30° East -:_`` - 26.60 chains to the center of County.Road; thence - South 7C° 48' East 9.91 chains to the Southwest corner of J. A. Keller's tract of land; thence �° South 10 chains to a stake; thence West 5 chains to ; a stake; thence South 1C chains to the place of be- ' - g+min B, all in Section 1, 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian; EXCEPTINC therefrom n. cPrt in tract conveyod by Rudolph Hochuli at u;: and George J. Erdner at ux to Beaverton and Willsburg - Rai7s•oad Co. as shown by instrument recorded.in Deed __ -Book 75, page 420, on May 24, 1907, containing 29.724 _ acres, more or less. . The easement and right of way herein granted shall be ;N a strip 28 feet in width located along the westerly boundary line -='r; of the tract above described, and more particularly described ti L;: Bin 575 PAGE 43 ,: . .' 7-". r w,ss:..xx. ti f �,.._.--,•--c--�-r- .r--.--^'�"--•-i r+•-r - .1.. ' . • i G 0 7 6 '',: 4. as follows: -T'' Beginning at a stone at the Northwest '` 111 corner oi' the W.W. Graham DLC # 39, Township 2 . MI South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian in Washington County and running thence South 43° 23' ';.ee West along the Northwesterly line of said DLC 734,0 ":.- • •` -- feet to a point ir, the center of the County Road; `"• thence South 60° 59' East in the center of said '`• County Roan 1814.3 feet to a stone at the.Northeast '• corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to YY.e �T R. and Sophia. Hunziker by Deed as recorded on _ page 271 of Volume 90 of Washington County Deed F`- °,' records; thence South 29° 34' West along the _ East line of said Hunziker tract a distance of 20.0 feet to a point in the Southerly right-of-way line of Hunziker Road, said point being the true point of beginning of the hereinafter described = property; thence South 29° 34' 41ect 1332.57 feet; M thence 153.95 feet along the arc of a curve to _' . the left havin a radius of 490.50 feet which chord bears South 20 34' 30" West 153.32 feet; thence South 11° 35' West .5.60 feet; thence 94,20 feet e. along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius - of 894,59 feet which long chord bears South 6° 34' West 94.16 feet; thence 77.65 feet along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 3132,24 • feet which long chord bears South 0° 16' 11" East .•e LAN 77.52 feet; thence South 42° CO' East 41.39 feet; ,. en thence North 59° 51' 3U'' ast- :41 -feet; thence 106.09 feet along the arc of a curve to the right Ne :;:e " having a radius of 3511.^c4 feet-which long chord bears Ncrth 3° 01, 47" West 105.69 feet; thence 91.25 r..21" feet along the arc of a curve to the right having • a 'radius of 666,59 feet which chord bears North 8° <=`7 -_`''_ . 34' East 91.21 feet; thence North 11° 35' East %,.. �` 5.60 feet; thence 145.16 feet along the arc of a '; curve to the right having a radius of 462.50 feet ' "i=+ ,y. which long chord bears North 20° 34' 30" East 144.57 `- feet; thence North 29° 34' East 1336.44 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of Hunziker road; thence .North 71° 45' 30" Wect along the orutherly right-of-way line of Hunziker road 28.5b feet to the True Point of Beginning. The rights, privileges anu authorities herein granted are subject to the following terms and conditions: .� '1.*: 1.• If Grantee elects to construct a spur track, Grantee 4;� shall also construct at the same time a parallel track for switching purposes on the north side of Hunziker Street. _i - -1, Grantors Fran W. Fields and Suzanne Fields will contribute the sum of $5,000 to the cost of constructing the spur track i;'ti. . � • facility for. which this easement is .granted, such sum to become . = S : °' 2 Boon 575 P��_ 44 • _. —- . .. .... ._. - . 4z t t avaa- .try. -SJ;. c3 9O7S 771 payable upon completion and installation of the spur track azaa• and parallel track. If Grantee elects to construct said '�. spur track, Grantee shall from and after the construction . thereofpay all taxes upon the right-of-way strip and track improvements thereon except as provided in paragraph 3 below. al G. Crantoru reserve the right to crate under said 0;• `'--c easement and•ri ht of way for sewage disposal and water > • g Y S P :te" drainage purposes, or over by roadways. 3. Grantors reserve the privilege hereafter to construct additional spur facilities connecting to the spur which Grantee Ldp may elect to construct-, for the purposes cf nerving businesses �lU Fred W. Fields and Suzanne Fields-Sx, on adjacent property. In such event, Grantors/will become r^ - obligated for a proportionate share of the taxes and maintenance expense of Grantee's main spur facility, but not for any of Grantee's main spur installation costs. ,, 4. In the event Grantee shall not elect to commence to eon- struct a spur track facility within 6 months from the date hereof or, if having constructed such spur tract facility Grantee shall thereafter at any time abandon the same, then in either such event the above-described premises shall be free from this ease- ment as fully and completely as if the same had not been made. In the event of such abandonment Grantee, or its successors or . assigns, shall furnish .tc Grantors a c;uitclaim deed in standard form to evidence the fact of such abandonment and relinquishment of rights hereunder, ti.;a. IN WITNESS WHEREOb' Grantors have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. '`' i4,-f lf/ i..I!L/ R u ' . /144-11:'.-&-e•-•-j: 1-5.--67 . ..,.., , 3 BOOK 575 FA F 45 •t — _2r.., ....; 9076 _ ii State of Oregon _ es County of Washington ) Ori this 7-C` day of , G`c�s , 1965, personally appeared the above-named FRED W. FIELDS and SUZANNE FIELDS and •" .— aclaiowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. ,...0.,---:....!.%-z.is Before me: n • - . / / Yom. 'i ,'. Notary Public for Oreggon o-. . My commission expires: .. 9 pod , .iltni^\y - _ • Query: •y..� - jr:•tom .. "s 5-y.. - 4 Boat 575 PA 46 . . 5 90 7 6 • State of Oregon • ss County of Washington • • On this ..2_0 � day of et)c L L'._ , 1965, Per- sonally appeared the above-named LAUREN H. NICHOLS and BYRL . • NICHOLS and-acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. ;,V:•f Tr;f''• Before me: -: 4{7-0--Z,Z1 -7//. 41` yti Notary Public for Oregon' ; • 1.r�A; .: Nor commission expires: .-k. 9 `yam • • • • t • • --r • • . STATE OF OREGON Wanly or Wmhlaalml:r.r .• .. A°.../ J 1;Nader.Thmhese Ir• +aG'•o.e+pr dl Rocwdr und� _ Ck•alunt d•`x•ORlsia Nteader•cGonroranced far•said mawy,do iLerol.y e:rblp r dt'IA wltbtn ..•. _ iaeaaraenl al:rnuaa vu revaand and recorded ^• • In baati,.. Z �7f• In IM Niwide K -:~ at said Oonnty. • :-1 Witmer.ray boat and seal pealed. :: •.... ,' ROGER.� TTflO 5WEN.D4n.d.n / Day any Oct 27 3 tn.PM'65 • • 5 BOOK 575PAGE 47 -: � - Prof:SW Bunzlker St. - LID - ">I<::* • 11116 dent:R/W#13 =:� • Deed Ref.:931/853 ':=t ' TL X200 (2S1 1HD� ;�; STREET DEDICATION at-- Y°a AND SLOPE EASEMENT n,.tt'4 =Y'', KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we I) ' '`S'" r r Klokke Corporation, Inc., a California Corporation, s� s '' ' hereinafter termed grantor(s), in consideration of the sum of $963.03 to be paid by i- f,1 the CITY OF TIGARD, a e'tnicipality of the State of Oregon hereinafter termed the i'S City, or at the option o;' the City to be credited in part payment of Bunziker Street improvement ascese-.ent against the premises, or which the following 5 described areas form a part, --- • I. Grantors give, grant and dedicate unto the Public the following: `-;=r A perpetual right-of-way and easement for public road, public street and public utility purposes to become a part of the "•4 public right-of-ray of S.W. 8unziker Street on, over, across, along, "'• under and within that portion of that certain tract of Grantor(s) T°' !'• as described in Decd Book 931 at Page _!22,.._:, Deed Records of t'„. Washington County, Oregon, lying South of a line drawn ?, ti,,I} i parallel to and thirty (30) feet North of, vben measured ,L :;...i•`: at right angles of the following described center line of S.W. 7-n, Bunziker Street, said center line being described as follows: - %%1 '>xa .t';_y In the William Graham Donation land Claim No 39 in the North r' half of Section 1, Tovnshlp 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. "u Beginning at a point on the centerline of S.W. Hall Boulevard ; • • ?.? ?x''." located South 57°16' 06" West 803.95 feet from a stone marking ''- ' ..e-IF- the Northwest corner of the Will',i.am Graham D.L.C. #39; thence ..ft:`)1 • 4 ,k--`'.. � along the center line of S.W. Hunziker Street South 61° 11' 11" ••'; _ �^s• ;' East 1989.59 feet to a point of curve; thence along the arc of a 200.00 foot radius curve to the left having a central angle of • ._ t'. 4_1,7_4 10° 57' 10" the chord of which bears South 66° 39` 46' East 36.17 •"•`- . ,,5•'' feet (an are distance of 38.23 feet); thence South 72°08' 21" a' K'' Font 601.66 feet to a point of curve; thence along the are of a ::�s 200.00 foot mane curve to the left having a central angle of "' 18° 01' 18" the chord of which bears South 81° 09' 00" East 62.65 feet (an arc distance of 62.91 feet); thence North 89° 50' 2111 - •a;, _ East 188.90 feet to the terminus at Oregon State Highway station ••"�' . i "8" 449+00.00 of the Beaverton-Tigard Highway Section, said terminus : o•= ''- : t•;;ci being North 15° 18' 46" West 2660.19 ft• from a stone at the Easterly - t :%'••Southeast corner of the William Graham D.L.C. #39, and South 30° ., r..f•'1. 36' 12" West 1493.76 feet from a 2" iron pipe at the Northeast �: '� > `; corner of the William Graham D.L.C. #39, said 2" iron pipe also `�i n t being the initial point of Hermosa Park Plat. ' . •......'t, ;s iy — ..."'S..!:- ACCEPTED BY TIM TIGARD dry COUNCIL NOVInliER 24, 1971 wp,'. ;-" VDorrs ILart1I , 4`8/`4 -- }"- ,,l ,t jr 41 y n cor or- .; n ' •-' BOOK 1056 rn,E7$11 oaf'► ' i :j. * l'i':;. ...1.?..,:! "'...: • ....'-'..,(71.,-,,..•,,z• , 'KA:' t'l1.-,• f?.:+.'t:..:•+•'',r'-� ' •. 1 it .•.:.. •a 1 41•Rr 3.'y .� ,1 ,+=ti—,-0y. .t v,K,. ''4 , _F i'4 .r I • Sara:"`"::he y: t:• I r .riff• n �A?.: y'i . a,,,, I7. Orantore also hereby at, bargain, sell and convey • ■the ':1 ; City of Tigar,l the following: 11.110 ;;'i Asperse-neat right-of-way and easement for the purpose of constructing, - i 'ji maintaining and/or repairing slopes, lute or fills occasioned by or ="' resulting from the improvement of B.W. Runzikcr Street, within an area described as follow§!; ,. , • ,o That portion of'Grantor's lands as described in Deed Boak 931 •. i .�= } at Page 853, Deed Records, Washington County, Oregon, ?'* - lying —raja of a line drawn parallel to and )feet - '� North •�, when measured at right angles, the center '' line of S.W. Hunziker Street, as described in Parcel I above described, reserving, however, to Grantor, heirs ant assigns •the full use and dominion over the mid easement area; provided, ,:; •however, that such use shall not be permitted to interfere with the • ;:r.::. purpose for which the cmoement is granted. jam;. 1,. Should it be necessary to cut and remove any brush, trees, as r• s,i� other materials from the above described easement area, the City :.,: iy• agrees that seine shall be removed and disposed of by the City :::;/ and the area left In a neat and workaenlike condlticn. . '`: t Grantors do hereby warrant that they are the owners in fee simple of the described ... -- .,.' premises and have the right to grant the easements hereinabove set forth. '),ti • WITRESB our hands and seals this 4th day of September ; ' es 197 5 XLOKRE ObRPO 'ZION y ' . .. csza),Y_ . i. 1/ (".1/ (spar) _YS,kY' (sFAL)BY: , -!i7/. (SEAL) c?::" (SEAL) ` (MAL) a 'zel N;,;�. STATE OF SWIM( CALIFORNIA '' `..}"-. il; r' ) s5. k• i.c.,.b .-, -*f:-44 County of LOS ANGELES ) • �••..-r ' +`, r_ On this 4th day of SEPTEMBER • 19 75 , before me appeared F.,-'•- _ . and W. D• MILLIREN '' KARL KLOKKE '•• •j• Y • both to ine personally known, who being duly'sworn, did say that he the said .p _ KARL XLOK IC !s the President, and he, :fir said • _ _ r'• 1",.• W. O. MILLIREN is the � � t Secretary of -'*• XLOKXE CORPORATION, the within named Corporation, , tor . 'le,` 3tilk§3 Nteti£E�#3M8RIEMPOE EBE3YEli3Emuv( flANWomfdo of1{�R'f�f1CiP#sR`t RNA ;• �'l�;• -••)%•°' and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Cozporatiott by "•y' � ;;�. r'. authority of its. Board of Directors, and KARL KLORKE and ;.• . ' ...7;:,1% acknowledged said instrument to be the ;y•, •s;,,• "" r- ; free act and deed of said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set c :s, r, .�.w... my hand and affixed my official seal the day ti !'p oeruir.al. aUgc a year last above written. t. ' DIXIE A. BURCKEL Y •,.;- :�;i :nlr.•. .(.y. N71A el PUR IC rlAQ0.4m _ l: ! MrCommaflaakwrisS+pt';.7Nt4 q Notary bite C ifornia •• •,`' 4;•`-;:::.,14, ryy1(`t r,.i l j. My Commission expires 1� ✓7� .': • ,tw• • SIB.'':x•' n •"•' R" h'.- ' i� {{. ' • • ,• -Y:Efff ` Pacific Northwest REZO T'„+✓ry ','`• 11116 Loan 0 2 146 986 dam p•: . ACT OP SUBORDINATION ;.'« :.f.:1• `1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • • • ;; J 4'..;-' County of King ea. _try ," irw` WHEREAS, D. H. OVERMEYER WAREHOUSE CO., an Oregon Corporation, by indenture of .-, Mortgage under their hand and seal, duly executed, bearing date of April 22, 1965, and i, • :k.:;1 recorded in Book 551, Page 263, of the records of Washington County, Oregon, did grant to THE PIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OREGCh to secure the payment of a note in the amount of I--. •• ;' Six Hundred Fifty Thousand and No/100 ($650,000.00) a certain tract of land situated in ri•, the State of Orr_ on, and said Mort Mortgage e was duly assigned ed to THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE °`"! �•_ S S S Y Bn .7-• -;: 1 COMPANY OF AMERICA, by instrument dated February 17, 1966 and recorded in Hook 588, Page ``' . . ,:•,- 515, of the records of Washington County, Oregon, and for a full and complete description- of which, reference is here made to the recorded Mortgage above mentioned. :`'�^';, AND, WHEREAS, by Street Dedicaticn and Slope Easement dated the 4th day of September, ' 1975, the Klokke Corporation did sell, convey and warrant unto the City of Tigard, Oregon, ":1.3.• ••`, a Municipal Corporation, a perpetual and irrevocable easement for street dedication and maintenance and repairing slopes, cuts or fills, over and across the land and property fsituated in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows, to-wit: `- v PARCEL I: ?i:" i : 4 ..4 A perpetual right-of-way and easement for public road, public street and public • • • . w xw,"i utility purposes to become a part of the public right-of-way of S.W. Hunziker _,o,..k. Street on, aver, across, along, under and within that portion of that certain r . '.i_•4 4.) tract of Grantor of said easement as described in Deed Book 931 at Page 653, ..•• .•*, ;eb r: Deed Records of Washington County, Oregon, lying South of a line drawn parallel + `:!'._ `"•' to and thirty (30) feet North of, when measured at right angles of the following '�;•'i described center line of S. W. Hunziker Street, said center line being described / •r '' as follows: -:a .: /. ".`4: 14. In the William Graham Donation Land Claim No. 39 in the North half of Section 1, ',''�:'" ::':,• ��•;+� Township 2 South, Range 1 Weet, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington • • �:' y' , *A County, Oregon. _ati. ._ • '4!..,,• Beginning at a point on the center line of S.W. Nall Boulevard located South ; , 57'16'06" West 803.95 feet from a stone marking the Northwest corner of the _� "''` -i-I° William Graham D.L.C. 039; theacc along the center line of S.W. Hunzikar Street • • r•f•. ts: ;T;.;;•`; South 61'11'11" East 1,989.59 feet to a point-of curve; thence along the arc of :. :-*s � a 200.00 foot radius curve to the left having a central angle of 10'57'10" the • •: �, ;%-? .' chord of which bears South 66'39'46" East 38.17 feet (an arc distance of 38.23 •'-•'? ; feet); thence South 72'08'21" East 601.66 feet to a point of curve; thence along .%_• '„ ;W the arc of a 20D•00 foot radius curve to the left.having a central angle of 18'01'18" s:.•;:• ' y;n' the chord of which bears South 81'09:00" East 62.65 feet (an are distance of 62.91 }.+ ,t feet); thence North 89'50'21" East 188.90 feet to the terminus at Oregon State ! Hight/ay otatian "H" 449+00.00 of the Seoverten Tigard Highway Section, said terminus •t`'s�N� being North 15'18'46" West 2,660,19 feet from a stone at the Easterly Southeast z corner of the William Graham D.L.C: 039, and South 30.38'12" West 1,493.76 feet W from a 2" iron pipe at the Northeast corner of the William Graham D.L.C. 0 39. • . °,c = said 2" iron pipe also being the initial point of Herm:aaa Park Plat. PARCEL II A. Also, a permanent right-of-way and easement for the purpose of constructing, : maintaining and/or repairing elopes, cuts or fills occasioned by or resulting "? y from the improvement of S.W. Hunziker Street, within an area described as follows: r5' r.r= 1:,'.:.:7;:1,:,',.= soar.j 6 rn.ti 7fi2 `<=• i'. _ t. 3 [�t� 34x 1 . ,j.: �i:r.. .. ._.. fit .�'•. ~ip . -'. . _ ' 11116 '' . That portion of Grantor of said easement's land so described in Deed Book 931 c?, ?, ''Sr:' at Page 853, Deed Records, Washington County, Oregon, lying South of a line %" +• ]s.+ drawn parallel to and forty (40) feet North of, when measured at right eagles, ��:`: the • center line of S.W. Huntiker Street, as described in Parcel 1 above de- i:fi :.s,• ' -- : scribed, reserving, however, to Grantor, heirs end assigns the full use and 'l dominion over the said easement area; provided, however, that such use shall '', 'ub not be permitted to interfere'with the purpose for which the easement is granted• 4" >` Should it be necessary to cut and remove any brush, trees, or other materials from the above described easement area, the City agrees that sane shall be re- moved and disposed of by the City and the area left in a neat and workmanlike condition. • And, WHEREAS, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, the holder of the mortgage • r indebtedness herein mentioned, has been requested to subordinate its mortgage lien only : •r 1 INSOFAR as it affects the said forty (40) foot strip specifically described above in - said easement, which it hen agreed to do for the consideration hereinafter recited. w; NOW, THEREFORE, the said THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA in consideration : , " ..4 of the sum'of $10.00, cash in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged and '`. "r' other good and valuable consideration, does hereby subordinate its mortgage lien above Et . f: mentioned to the said eauement mentioned above, but only insofar as it pertains to said .s;r. T. r; s ;.a9 forty (40) font strip of land described in said easement. Reliever, this subordination , ?'%r shall in nowise affect the remaining land in said Mortgage in favor of the PRUDENTIAL {= :V I.» =CHANCE CC'1PA.':: OF AMERICA, or impair the rights of THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY -'.,'f, :t,.• OF AMERICA, its7-aer.ceneors or assigns, to hold, foreclose or sell under the lien created .;:. '=te'6, by the above mentioned Mortgage in any manner prescribed by contract or law, all of the , ; .: ',:..ea a lands, hereditaments and appurteuancss thereto belonging, it being merely the intention fie , • of said TH: PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA to waive the priority of its mortgage ..ti. i•b.•i„t, r`,•e- lien, and any renewal of said lien, in favor of said easement on the said forty (40) foot .1.... • r 4.F.,::%$. strip of land specifically described in said easement, and any foreclosure or sale of : F•.. • ..:,i4 said land or any part thereof, shall expressly except and be subject to said easement. p;• IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, HAS CAUSED THESE ..s PRESENTS to be executed by its Third Vice President and its Assistant Secretary, and • -?. the corporate seal of said Company to be affixed on this the '/1-0•-day of October, �'��•"fe:• . 1975. ,. Ea 1 ,1'0';,,, t" A.• ` ""_ THE PRODF-�IIAL ACE * ' nr OF AMERICA ,.. "1 BT: /.01/ I 7W. •y.r s ..... r A. Rick, Third Vice ' asident rjL-y• ''. :44r. V • / ,,, amen A. Winkelmaf, Assistant Secretary Sy 3 r. SY1(YE OF WASHINCTO't Tu.a�' = —w, o�(' `�sue. 1 ,.•. ) (r1' )(,,,ryry M TRONOSIIt Dimas d 11.mm.h Ll.%neo+ k County of King as. BOOK 1056 F1:GE j6J '"�2(7'r�? n.ps's ',:• ;ff `iE; On October 3 , 1975, before me, Notary Public in and for the County of Ring, State •• ....- .... .:;;'.- ;n' of Washington, personally appeared Karl A. Rick, to me known to be the Third Vice Pres- .l y3: "''-•`✓ 'dent and James A. Winkelman, to me known to be the Assistant Secretary of THE PRUDENTIAL .... •. c;c1. INSURANCE COMPANY-3F AMERICA, the Corporation that executed the with instrument, and :. ! .. • .,c•; acknowledged to me that such Corporation executpp the sam . , / f :a. m/i 6.t.7-1-41x /1 C'l ))t,- (-- - } Notary Public innd for said County and State ' •` y • ; Hr Commission Expires: /f'�- 7 9 Residing at Seat e, 'ashinCton b 4 it ; • F •k e. . , j'' l , i • . ':'..,-:,.:,;;;;.;4.' _J.tS {z S t . •Alor 0 li • :: I . .- 1\ "' J• " core 90030642 AND WHEN RECOROCU MAIL IO """r-Southern Pacific Ind. nev.-1. :Z1L. 610 Pacific Building GUY" LPortland, Oregon 07209 J • ao — — 6RACEADOVE THE LINE ROM EECDADE"'s UK f EASEMENT I FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby . acknowledged, B.G.M. CO., a corporation, Grantor, hereby grants to SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Grantee, I an easement for railroad, transportation and communication purposes upon, over, across and along the real property described in Exhibit "A," attached and hereby made a part hereof. It IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused these presents to be f executed as of this ''- day of Z2TE4,.....1._.. , 1980. I ' B.G.M. CO. 1. 4 Yrt'le) ' q `. .1 Attest ZTit1eL, 1 ■ I 1 um I li P .. .. J) . , „ co 1 /- 3 0 MI 0 3, /91.° . • • : t EXHIBIT "A" A parcel of land lying and being In the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section. 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Base and Meridian, County of Washington, State of Oregon, being a portion of the land described in deed dated April 7, 1965, from Edward C. and Babette Hunziker, husband and wife, to O. H. Overmyer Warehouse Co., an Oregon Corp., recorded April 8, 1965, Book 548, Page 414 and deed dated July 10, 1978, from John S. Hering, Roy C. Goecks, George E. Mack, a partner- ship of B.R.G. Co., to the E.G.M. Co., a partnership of John B. • Hering, Roy C. Ooecks and George E. Mack, recorded July 12, 1978, Reel 78-31090, deed records of Washington County, more parti- cularly described as follows; Beginning at the point of intersection of the easterly line of said land described in deed dated April 7, 1965, being also the westerly line of said land described in deed dated July 10, 1978, with the northerly line of S. W. Hunziker Street (60 feet wide); thence North 60°59'00" West, along said northerly • line of street, 20.0 feet to a point distant 15.0 feet north- westerly from the located center line of the drill track crossing said street; thence North 4°16'14" East a distance or 110.87 feet to a point distant 15.0 feet westerly from the relocated center line of the spur track serving the Rlokke Company; thence South 82°55'30" East a distance of 43.33 feet to a point distant 15.0 - Page 1 of 2 - ( I 0 I 0 ! 0 , • • • • 1 feet southeasterly from the relocated center line of the spur track serving H.G.M. Company; thence South 11°05'08" West a distance of 120.61 feet to a point in the northerly line of said • I Hunzlker Street distant 15.0 feet southeasterly measured radially from the center line of the drill track crossing said street; thence north 72°05'50" West, along last said northerly line, a distance of 11.12 feet to the point of beginning containing an area of 4234 square feet more or less. STATE OF OREGON Cwmy el wa.idnalm. i. Rpm Thomcaan. Crr°;;or of RK°rda and EuKI■ado and E,.Onlcia RKordar al Cam nyancaa!a Yld county.do nanaby artily That VInnhin inwaumani of ryrving wn,wcm.ad and/atordad Si book of iaeord,°f Ned county. ROGER THOMSSEH.S tumor of /D/ Roan]a&Elvenona - Page 2 o f 2 - I980 S E P 3 P11 • i rr.. V) O 0 ItAkiriammatthi • ELECTRIC POWER LINE EASEMENT 84031391 XNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,Thaw KLOKRE CORPORATTON thereinafter called the Grantors," whether one or more than one),for and in conaideratlon of the payment of the eum 01 One and no/100 Dollars IS 1.00 ),the receipt of which Is hereby acknowledged, hereby grant,sell and convey to Portland General Electric Company,art Oregon torporatlan, (hereinafter called"the Grantee,"whether one or more than once. Hs successors and assigns,a perpetual easement ana right of way over,under and across the following described parcel of land situated en the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, County of Washington, State of Oregon, said easement being s strip of land 16 feet wide and 8 feet an each aide of a centerline, being more particularly deecriba-in fallowei BEGINNING AT a Portland General Electric Company power pole, No. 836, which bears 5.56'19'06"E., 50.25 feet from the southwest corner or that curtain tract of land, as described in Book 931, Pageo 853 and 854, Deed Records of said county; THENCE, along said centerline, N.10'39'04"W., 74.55 feet to s Portland General Electric Company power pole, No. 5215; THENCE, N.7'58'41"E., 73).)) feet to Point "A", said point being a Portland General Electric Company power pale, No. 6705; THENCE, 5.81.53'36"E., 287.75 feet to a Portland General Electric Company power pole, No. 6707, and the terminus of said centerline, TOGETHER WITH a centerline described as BEGINNING at sold Point "A"I THENCE, along said centerline, N.14'50'17"E., 118.35 feet, more or lees, to the North Iine of said tract of lend and the terminus of said cent erline. EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion lying within or on the right-of-way of S.W. HUNZIKER STREET and BEAVERTaN-TIGARD HIGHWAY (State Highway No. 217), The above-described centerlanea are shown on Portland General Electric Company Drawing E-6926, attached hereto which by reference thereto le made a part hereof. TO }LAVE AND TO HOLD tee above described casement and right of way unto the Grantee, its successors •and assigns, together with the present right to top,limb or fell trees located on land owned by the Grantors,adjacent to the above described right of way.which danger trees will be determined by the Grantee. Said easement and right of way be fur the following purpnaes, namely: the perpetual right to enter upon and to erect, maintain, repair,rebuild,operate and petrel electric power lines,and appurtenant signal or communication lines, including the right to erect such poles,wires,cables,guys,cupperta and appurtenances as are necessary thereto.together with the present and future right to clear said right of way and 14c/spite:same clear of brush, timber,structures and fire hazards. including the right to restrict the growth of trees and brush un said right of way by the use of chemical sprays. Grantors shall have the right to tree the lands subject to the above described easement for all purposes not Incon- 'latent with the uses and purposes herein set forth,except Grantors shall not build or erect any structure upon the right of way without the prior written consent of the Grantee. If the Grantee,is successors and assigns,shall fail to use said right of way for the purposes above mentioned for a continuous period of five years atter construction of said power lines,then and in that event this right of way and ease- ment shall terminate and all rights and privileges granted hereunder shall revert to the Grantors,their heirs and assigns. The Grantors hereby warrant that they are possessed of a marketable title to the property covered by this easement. and have the right to grant the same. The Grantors, for themselves and their heirs and assigns, covenant to and with the Grantee, Its successors and assigns,that the Grantee,jut successors and assigns,shall peaceably enjoy the rights and privileges herein granted. IN W1TN0+S5 WHEREOF, the Grantors have caused this easement to be executed thle day of fi5 ?4.'" KLOXRE C •PORATION / • ` By • . • tntcrto d (SEA!.? ?4-4-�...OHN G. NELSON, tsenl) - NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON _ • !SEAL' My Commission Expirrs.....I ��- _ STATE OF OREGON _ county of_ Washington On thls_ and. .day oe ,19 4, betote me. the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State,personally appeared Karl Klokke to me known to be the Individuals described In and who executed the foregoing inatrument,and acknowledged that they executed the same freely and voluntarily, IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my notarial seal this, the day and year in this instrument first written. Notary lc for Oregon M mtnlstdon expires IEW/af 5-59,4765 Attachment • • • - F=..... • R wK \ ..........--f il 1 I a too Y so '1 ' x b,; .'r„ 7 41 Otte r S �J�� Ai 9t3;I ` F.l N -- A ZOO PI w / lvr 71' . rrtrtrrw rir• gi "i• vii• cif o 111 : i j: f ' ---. . x wi2Lf d ' . itd7GE 2011•7!' N nu( tr.lJi !''fi.t \ s t t Kcak.rE Ccestarav ` t a N 14, 1000A�c�. . ti/ s /VW 153*Alif ?e. qt • R's OV W k I Ai,w,.F.,, k ! i 71./03 \ . t i .4T H.FM.CO. ti `� ti FEE/y,►, 78-3/070 4 V••y w I H r i i N. • W h } I r h 4ti ! . w h 79' R• } t , , Atli AV.Nib 1 fY 1171 17: r. Sir ■ •• M l0'1l100.1v 3.�,��� P��.u m I aver. a.kit Mu Ht.tILIZ. 7.."..."'"<4.t............41/ iy. 3�' q lr.#�J�,�x t Mrvittalf. / .11,4&IN dr Niu.o. Nu .6 • - ' sYM et men an toms , fE Mr 74/..1,4111 Nlia w�atainJ --N. , I+Wis—rrssi r ,=. _ _____ 42 75. cum No.E— I • o M I-• 'd i o ° N 3,j NJ n ca w it• '4 e r t r, 17 t7 'Li I, .6........_ kt F J et tJ C•1 ti O N tV O - Y V O F G - m D C = -r s C yy m m w m i 2 p x 1 -Z1 Z t 1 C7 G Q\ C' a Q • 1 vi 4 P S i I . ... (� 1 STATE OF OREGON I. Courtly of Washington I SS I.Donald W.Masan.Orrcc for of Ass,ssmenl and Taxation and Ex-Officio Rewrtler of Con• •evancns for son:county Jo pereby ccrtdy that de. widen mslrarnenl of wnhny was"uttered mill',corded In book of rncurdr of Said c.nudy Clonal,' W Mason. Cut.lien of Assessment and Taxation,E,• C)Ihnn Chill Or:putt'Clink 41 19811111:: -:J r1N I?: 113 3 J TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT TITLE PLANT 1629 SW Salmon •Portland OR 97205 (503)224-0550 • FAX: (503)219-2212 October 14, 2008 Tigard Distribution LLC do Deering Management Group 4800 SW Macadam Avenue, Ste 120 Portland OR 97239 Order Number: 3626006463 Regarding: East Side Van and Storage Property Address: County: Washington DATED AS OF: October 8, 2008, 8:00 am PROPERTY We have searched our Tract Indices as to the following described real property: See Attached Legal Description. VESTING EAST SIDE VAN AND STORAGE RECORDED INFORMATION Said property is subject to the following on record matter(s): 1. Property taxes UNPAID Tax Year: 2008-09 Unpaid Amount: $188.30, unpaid plus interest Tax Acct Number: R1385183, 2S11 BD-00104, Code 023.74 2. Property taxes UNPAID Tax Year: 2008-09 Unpaid Amount: $264.40, unpaid plus interest Tax Acct Number: R2032391, 2S11 BD-00104-A1, Code 023.74 Affects: Improvements only- Billboard 3. Tigard city lien(s), if any. STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT(TI2) 1 4. Right, title and interest of Clear Channel Outdoor, as disclosed by Tax Rolls. 5. Access restrictions in Deed, including the terms and provisions thereof. From: Edward C. Hunziker and Babette Hunziker, husband and wife To: State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission Recorded Date: March 30, 1985 Recording Number: Book 546 page 361 County: Washington 6. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, From: Edward C. Hunziker and Babette Hunziker, husband and wife To: D.H. Overmyer Warehouse Co., an Oregon corporation Recorded Date: April 13, 1965 Recording Number: Book 548 page 414 For: Roadway Affects: West 25 feet 7. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, From: Edward C. Hunziker and Babette Hunziker, husband and wife To: City of Tigard, a municipal corporation Recorded Date: August 8, 1967 Recording Number: Book 653 page 598 For: Underground sewer Affects: 15 foot wide strip on East side of Beaverton-Tigard Highway 8. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, From: Babette Hunziker, et at To: City of Tigard, municipality Recorded Date: September 15, 1975 Recording Number: Book 1043 page 974 For: Slope Affects: 10 foot wide strip on North line of SW Hunziker Street THIS REPORT IS TO BE UTILIZED FOR INFORMATION ONLY. Any use of this report as a basis for transferring, encumbering or foreclosing the real property described will require payment in an amount equivalent to applicable title insurance premium as required by the rating schedule on file with the Oregon Insurance Division. The liability for TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY is limited to the addressee and shall not exceed the premium paid hereunder. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY /fr- ■2-4 STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT 0I2) 2 That portion of the tract conveyed to Edward C. Hunziker and Babette Hunziker, by Deed recorded May 28, 1937 in Book 165 page 35, Deed Records of Washington County, Oregon in the Southeast one- quarter of the Northwest one-quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, lying Southwesterly of the new Beaverton- Tigard Highway (Highway 217), more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwesterly corner of that certain tract conveyed to D.H. Overmeyer Warehouse Co., by Deed dated April 7, 1965 in Book 548 page 414, Washington County Deed Records; thence South 81° 37' 38" East along the North line of said Overmeyer tract, 213.10 feet, more or less, to a point on the Southwesterly right-of-way line of the said highway; thence North 34° 16' 53" West along the said Highway right-of-way to the North line of said Hunziker tract; thence North 82° 50'West along the North line of said Hunziker tract to a point which bears North 82° 50'West 755.04 feet from the Northeast corner of said Hunziker tract; thence South 08° 22' 22" West along the East line of that tract conveyed to Donald B. McCormick and William J. Macy, Trustees by Deed recorded September 1,:1959 in Book 421 page 746, Deed Records of Washington County, Oregon, 1140 feet, more or less, to a point on the North line of SW Hunziker Street (Road); thence South 60° 50' East along the North line of said road to the Southwest corner of the said Overmeyer tract; thence North 08° 22' 22" East along the West line of said Overmeyer tract to the point of beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1629 SW Salmon Portland,OR 97205 r. IW TICOR TITLE INSURANCE This map is made solely for the purpose of assisting in locating said premises and the Company N assumes no liability for variations; if any, in dimensions and location ascertained by actual survey. :i•'Y, ,. F,` ^'r,•1:'• � 1,\I1 7: ^ •: :ti •. Y .4,...e.•:t• ••\ %• -Y•,ti 4 Y ,. :r ';:� 301 '`. ._"s••• ••••:',•'''-'.." •'Y% ':i• 't T •;•; :: ti ... ,C•;;;,,...•:,.r: ' 'i} \ I. •+�• ,,�g�lasa17�--‘4..:.:.:_,...f•+: f• "';..>,',..„',...;;;;.:;:,:.;•.;::;:,:,-;,,>:::.:..."::',..:,::,1: r .'. .': f ': 'r, tnlc / 114 :i It i; .%'•;+i •Y :1'a: 'n;' 1''• / 11444 :t,'•: ; ,: •; > r,�it•;t' ;i .' a.. —_..0211.._ / \ :: ,• X • _ ,\ 141 ass;i: �,�' :�;• .•:,j>' ,• ::, ;:,� :i° :,; . ,11,x, ms nom I,r •,';�; ':t:;1:;': ? .. 711 I 1 \ ;•( :t >'~ ;:g:?:.:}": u9Ae I l St.'(' \ • It <.‘ %it\\\\ 1 1 '''.4:7:4'::-Z...4,,,4,g..>:‘,•-•,A,/t./ ...,•''....4..s.A...1% — 1 1 ./ / \ 0 c "�'r,'� 2 t' �. I,! i ! Y -ice±`v� `il fA: Y,,.^:: Y Y is n.w �g i 'S: "7 If..!• -`. .^, ',v,Yr;:i:( '-:t-','e4! j •„ ■ 16% 0 \ I .,...„.::,,,.,-......--:......,: :,:#1,6i4.„7, .,.."..-•:.-,\Afr-, / I is 1 ..b\ t.•' ,rtei , %,•',:� , 20045.2 A' . Vit.s6410, e -. :, ,.•,. le, :e :* .: :Is '. isca / f i / „ 16%- \. :_ ..,%:,..... I X1 4 / � '.,-c'�r, ^',r''� l•'s. , ,•?°�f L tai '3 C 4.e1.e I ±tom ",',* '/,;:c .;tom R it w • :: '•' '':r, i"': ': :: aka ti t,,...%/ : /....\,...V.. %t, '1...... 119 • '. ' ', '• •Y • < • :t :t''•Y'',•'•' ^•^ '' 'X•' '' ': ,, il . .\ /4 Y:i)r I_••••• 2'11.4.‘..•e:........:`, ;•....:.e.s,;•;,.X..?..‘,e...,::_.y..:•;,,,gve v.,........,,,..::„.;:v4,..P.,„.....:•%,..../.,.. ...*N-___:',7,7-1----.11„., / 4 : - ' 4 f,' ' ' <: ;, T. •: '• ': r • ; ,, ..;. .5• :/. i ',: Y,r._, y%i ,,., y f 1 :i ;; :, '' . ''3 '•;t , y ../.....,.:-3...,,,,:->s: , -•• ,'' • ` '"'.,�":,r; :Y, ,�? is i •:i X :i ; y •i :t :1,- i r , ;: : .e r � � y• ' ' 'pil9irol a y _ ......... —___ - AG • 0 File No, 3727f, ='"-•:'f 5856 Asieilt . WARRANTY DEED ` ` ` (Individual) i. '►,1+ It ZI C Slim bp T jc c Vrerittz, That....we,...Edward C. Hunziker and : `: Babette Hunziker, husband and wife _ S.. s......._..._. .. _. . »...............grantor..,, far the consideration of °u the sum of.......Fifty_Nine Thousand Six Hundred and No(100 ($59,600.,00) DOLLARS ,,,a -'"2: '..ie) ..= to us paid,have bargained and sold and by these presents do bargain,sell and convey $"?*` ,,,., unto the STATE Or OREGON,by and through its STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION,the following described premises,to wit: Y�: S y n parcel of land lying in the W. W, Graham D.L.C, #39,, Township 2 ^i+• :1 i" South, Range 1 West, W. H.. Washington County, Ore or., and being a portion ' 7,' € . St g g portion A. T4:', of that property described in that certain deed to Edward O. and Babette ° I °..r-",- j{ Hunziker, recorded in Book 165, Page 35 of Washington County Record of rI t Yr, , ..f Deeds; the said parcel being that portion of said property included in Way' �A a strip of lard variable in width, lying on each side of the center line -'-wu. ,?r . 1 of the Beaverton-Tigard Highway as said highway has been relocated, which ¢ f;,174 t Ya L U center line is described as follows: rt� ,ice ' y. Begi,vring at Engineer's center line Station 399+44.35, said Station wy ti=' °>1. being g 467.83 feet North and 788.48 feet East. of the Southwest corner of r F" r a the Thomas Stott ll.'.,.C° #53, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, W. M°; thence f- CJ -,t;'{jti on a spiral curve right (the long chord of which bears South 42° 22, 20" r- tu y� z ,:v East) 400 feet; thence on a 3819.72 foot radius curve right the long l�; ;: ' chord of which bears South 39° 01' 10" East) 135.93 feet; thence on a ""• 1,.,:. ` r spiral curve right (the long chord of which bears South 35° 00' East) sM 01d 600 feet to Engineer's Station 410+80.28 bark = 411+00.97 ahead; thence 44W ¢.,� ' ,! °"a. South 33° 30' East, 2074..89 feet; thence on a spiral curve left (the °e,;f „ long chord of which bears South 35° 10' East) 500 feet; thence on a mod i'h,t ,r-4, -s°� 2864.79 fool radius Curve left (the long chord of which sears South 42° -".; M-^K �� 15' East) 375 feet; thence on a spiral curve left (the long chord of ,,.�;..� .;:'.• .which bears South 49° 20' East) 500 feet; thence South 51° 00' East, '-7•".Y w" : '."�",:.r 139.52 feet; thence on a spiral curve right (the long chord of which ' ) r soh bears South 49° 00' Nast) 600 feet; thence on a 2864.79 foot radius , '�' `'•�' 1 .{l-� curve right (the long chord of which beano South 41° 16' 45" East) -' a tin JV+i 372.08 feet; t;rence on a spiral curve right (the long chord of which xn't "_?_ ^/: , bears South 33° 33' 30" East) 600 feet; thence South . 33' 30" East, ..:.d ""'r :� 538.93 feet; thence on a spiral curve left (the long chord of which bears ,„}:g,. l- T• p. South 34° 53' 30" East) 200 feet; thence on a 572°96 Scot radius curve . Za•t 09' 30" feet;left (the long chord of which bears South 50° 09 30 East) 372 feet; •^^ thence on a spira.'_ curve left (the long chord of which bears South 85° 25' ` . Act .-_-)e- , 45 0" East 58.34 reet to Engineer's gffi - �-•ti�� 30° East% 2u0 feel; thence South £tti° , , (5 Station 476'•31.73 which Statf.ou - Engineer's Station 96+45°20 on the center aPIR _e§' line of the relocated Pactfir Highway. ,,4. p4,-.-, t^ � The widths in feet of the -trip of land above referred to are as .t, s. �' follows: ., yw „. ' re.'7 t mr� ;:4 Station to Station Width on Northeasterly Width on Southwesterly yin -ra side of center line side of center Line '� 422+00 x27.00 90 110 1 c?t:'s' 427+00 436+75.86 90 in a straight this 11G in a straight c4- �S� t r' to 1.05 :.ins to 1;0 k ..•'!.. ,�*-'•` .?',l: 436-*75-8o L40+50.86 105 in a straight lire 140 in a freight trvq~,w '.3 to 115 line to 120 M. ..p-- 4,,' `_ ` -..utJa (Bearings used herein are based upon the Oregon_ Co-ordinate System, �_ '. .za.< North Zone') � N:''''--�' The parcel of land to which this descrlp*,ion applies contains 5,.2' '1 acres. 5CIOK 546 PAGE 361 . r { tC "r- to .c.21 TK+{��, .4 ,roe[ ,ti inz. rat z 4 y t' `f :,. fit--,; Y }`{N ?'�ti�,"`� C.t? ..,;.....,.*:,s1,418�T`z' f•.... E..a.h'd t`"'�., .wn'' y }x~•14' "...aj t,4,%+L 54.,.; i+�5. 'era. �� ,._x- ; r '"4 't' c IIn *.w 5. e �F' Er ,.".S',,.7a .i'"'s,-,rt,4 Ji . ) ti .4-. • • • . . . .,. r:. 41,'":"-•••0•0',.--".•-••••••i',,"Ar:1••••••,...--•-,-....c.1..ti-•.:-..s.,4-•,--.:-2•:-'-••"...iT•.-i-"••••,'-7i:-....- --• 7 ,..Zs.,..".•,•••7-4•""....•''''..:.•.4,.`":".. ." -,-.'...••■1';'••"..":•,•:..' .•'4 ..'"'i• •:"..4.•:"..S.5•4$7: ."....e"4'hi..11•••••4■-rt:s4.4"'',..47•'',4.4. 2•''''',1■;■._.ok k"'U .•••4.1•••;.,...'-'•t•••••••••6.:,•:,-;'''Li':•-•••.—''':•;-•:••••,..r-.4"t'3•4,-,Ft-':7..•--6.C".•:."I.2-...11"-..t...'""."..'-.'..;'...".,•=.- ,-_::..g:t...)14.5: 6;21.5i'4,4. ...s.rp:::e.1.":47.."7,4,44011VlaS-AZZI-Vre-4;• ::111:::-;±"ei..": '''"?...i.S.:.• ;:l.''tf:A.':?,.4'..tP.-':''..P.-1•!.:::?;:...`"--■'•!:•■!i*,■!•;.:•?'"•;?t'n."2:7.0-i%;;S:: :: .7›.":•7■• ••.•....e•- ':'''....,..ti.... "••:;c•-•.'.. g.ref....r.,. :,,:t.tes.■ • .,'.-;Z■:17,.:' • 4.;1'.1::!'• ..i .i.;• Nt•-'.1, ' .1:4:'; As a part of the consideration hereinabove stated, there is also bargained) sold, conveyed and relinquished to the Grantee all existing, future or potential common law or statutory abutter's easements of access between the parcel herein •-Fiihktr.,-, -•-••::,'-5.-‘:. 70.14; described and all of the Grantors emaining real property f.`,.1f44r -... ...,-..,:: 1 ... - ,-..,... It is expressly intended that these covenants, burdens, restrictions and reservations shall run with the land and shall forever bind the Grantors, their t -z6.1wq heirs and assigns, ttei.c'..4c ,:te.....11:Z.. rw/-r t-' .::-......,..;,..: ,4.-..r.: -ifi' 1.«.15141- va.....,,t. ,14,...c...... :::;1•=1,--re. •I'. fi:ri(5.::"..• .:41:,-- •kt:i-ils,171-4: ::.... ...:Itti u,.....2.,;...? TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises with their appurtenances, in fee simple, unto the said •*42. State of Oregon,by and through lts State Highway Commission,its successors and assigns forever ....W.. 1 -..-?.,•_:-,,,.. ..i ;:iv....... rt-4,7 And We the said grantor 3 do hereby covenant to and with the said State of Oregon,by and "r---,--:- ...,!......1.: through its State Highway Commission, its successor::and assigns,that we are the owner.l.... c•Wt-,,. ',:........ .. in fee simple of said prernisas;that they are free from all encumbrances ...... •oz..i.'r .r.ln.,2.., M -••----- .;;;;T:•:i•-•:?: and that.................we...................._will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. .1•7•:.:1.7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Jilt -. have hereunto set...........mr.............hand.2...and seaLa. 7'.c..:•,:-.c, ..,.....-,-.1.,: .----z-P this .............. day of ??74.6 4--Z ___..... _...,10...65 :-...,-.....,fp. .,...,..,..„ Does.in presence of: ...-.....tr, kl.c.r: • ,' -Fi'V ......._ . . .. . _ ..... '< 44:4444704.4.fi .e/712.-i-eas. cc"''2ISEAL] ti..c..,4,--- ...--,./.• . . • I .7',i7"•t'_4-4•11t'.•i•'W ''..4.:,..'. 1 1 i 1 P•-•;"-'v . 1 C.4:) a.... rwl I 1 1 1 1 Z 0 4 ...., W 1 I I . ., -,,, ,11.s.1 § i 1 1 aa r 1 g .._, 01 i V1 In Z ... ,21 ;1-.1 s i •5;'":ri 11 I f. I. I.- L! Z M 42 I I ° E .1 u , 4 0 ,4 1.11 i v Ser' ..., .....---' I 1 .._ . .2 141 • . .'.1:-et1!4••■..s" 1.- = 1: .. .;•11Z.St. 0 S 1 .--''' .. 7.5 111 0 in° • .! "N - __ 1t,= 0 ' ■ 4 -6, i ,- 0 P * ,....,.- _:,...,_......,..•s t!,....-„..1 1-..„ ....,7,..2 z.... a,, ..1*.lr.v...1. 5: 7F I ,Y, A , R! 1 24 A.; 1 0 •• : et:, ,....1 .. -v.:m -1 - :- : ..t;* I' . j• .' .e. 47) ;41 ...-V4-W 7tt•Aj'''. RN ct -, , .: s. - ‘4 t....P.t.=0^..?..•6 -•.......t: ; •;; • • In ,..1 0 • ;i:; %g;,i-i• ,I i : 4. ..,.;.A,..111, ..1 i ..c.' i %.'. St ; r4 .. •1-o .•1, . • A tg , .. .., ....e...41-.7- . z..• ,x g bi ! t- ow 1 O;1- • ''''''1 .1.-' 1.: •' .2 .•. ,i'6. -...!..I 71 ii ...11. 1 .1....t-,",'4!A 7 - . z i ' d•, 2 .1 - A i , !,-', 11 i •rIrt pii-gl I -4,.....1. .1,....isLiir,.... 0 ' ' •-•-..t,;.;"-.,- 3 d1425•11 STATE OF OREGON, --. ' County of...)/../...1.:. ....../..:.1.1....f.t.i................................._.1 On this ?...3 diy at. .....7'.1.1t 1.L 4.fh. ,19.0,personally came before me, I ...4,-7*■4 ..:., • a Notary Public in and for said county and state,the within named ............--...........-.......---.....-...........-...---- fil:-....•• r ____ 4#11Ard_C.Jiunsiker„ • and...-- .41.1lbitf/ HuPliker ,his wife, ................ 1: to TOO.Oor-IONOIVIapwn to bc:the Identical persona.. described in and who executed the within instrument, 4:AFT- -a; . L.1-.7......., . . :fie.t.k :! and Wisp tall 01464.11y acknowledged to me that t.he executed the same freely and voluntarily for the uses or:......r.ti,v. ..■ -0.i.:....k,....-- i antiiurposes ililaigri;4amed. 54;3'.47•:: •,-.i eSyltnairs...my.biistit and official seal the day and year last aboye written. 0! l .1:it • /, ......„..-...,. ........,,... i ....„,..,......... . .7.14._ Li.",,-- -r?3,re". 1.77 II: * . - '1..,..0.,1 R1 ; .• .... .,, ............a - ■if.'!Xt , nr.%".... ,?* x *Maw Mlle ror orrron 'F,•,,,k4.1511 •: MY con/mink=sxPirns(k.i..4.---'0.--./..2.L.C..,ttr.- ''' era 548 psfz' 362 7,;7711.3CAT4 . . ;,,, ,.,,, ---: 50:Rki, ' -,,: s,. .'..e,`3"..;%qilefi-1=7::::,rt:P-,W744;: ::';''ViYV÷r.'1,-''i'li"-Itr"-''-'t: ..;;:itd.?• 3--r:775r- .•••'.-04;%'.` -:'-: ....1:4:;•...,s4.F.--2:.‘.‘:.:<::t..;:-.1::•.);,.4'...'a-,;r.-i.4,.i...--ti-1.if,";...,‘,;;-4...2,-:.s,,N,44'1,;::;;;Al*4`4..4.4-.Wc'-'-ieL'-;-''''''.44r,:''f'!',..,'...Z.''',.%Z:.•:.:4';'-. ":'A'al:;7;,W.,;.;',Ft:.'.....41:2.:.',.4t,',..4..,,-,,,::',.?,.;;,,T,S.ff:',7;1,14t •Ik.,;i-.1-.A..;4:7'44-4.:;•■•5««:;:',Fitt;ii:',:,''....'''''),..Z.4::.42,,ek,:.,,,,Y35.7 .4.2,.;-:`;;;,f•-i::1.: ....q...i.;4;:t..7111.;;;:i;, ,:?;;;.,;;‘,,r-pli:7::::•,:ci'itf:4:..-";;.7 .7•:=g":!iii?:"•;•:-7;L;:r-tr-,';`..`,'2;:7,7-f-‘.....i47-.-:'.:11.,:,71::4"1.*.7‘.■,1.1.10.:, --; :.'4,;;Iie..:77.-Z,u-4,1::;:•71tk.4-1-w-lit;I:Vt51-4"`. 1::-:. -':',:tti:‘4-••AC4-'1:4=;I:47R-:-ALL4\;:• ;Ff.'• :'e-:_f44..) :',1-,3,-;P:=1;7i...;.'-'711',',,,:„.'n'ti,-F.';',':;',;Z•=r!...41-•1441i".?1.4.!$:?-^;,‘;‘...-;;',4'4-;I:41, -44.;-,Ir;t:-;,:',1,1r!-,',"*Zt•:‘,Sii'.:(4:7;•__ .,,jte.",1:-.47 !,...,-.-;,.%,Z:',-,:-L..*::Aii.i.,-;#,:iz.:-..4-- -_,•.i•-!iriliei7•4r---,::."`" ,,•••;*,:- ..1":-.1d• --t' -Firr.‘ix4;:ni.;:re,,.':-'47-1-is.:77-41- tri,'+_547-i-'i-stif't!V• .l: - ..-.- i... s +-t-^..-...- :---. ..-- ++b.—•+-.—�•. ,-J4•.....- .--.--. te- w.'°--,...... -.•:N- X��"'--.11,-,...:-..,..,-..:-,'i ■ uv... -•ors. s;•--r. - -.L.. f-, :.•�.-»aen +- .. .;r'' .-.w r .i - _ ; T.Z.:; '4 i iy ,tgik�•n f 986 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described and ��`-- ..;.'f':i, granted premises unto the said grantee, its successors f•, and assigns forever. k} ± "' Grantors covenant that they are la fully seized ! Is„ .k.' in fee simple of the above granted premises free from all `yam encumbrances except building and use restrictions, this r� .ryJ .: I.I.', tract being within the City of Tigard in the State of ": k '- :` Oregon and the Tigard Water District, and subject thereto :!` . 'y that they will and their heirs, executors and administrators `"4 .4 will forever warrant and defend the above-described premises it;117:::11:". `'�° and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims ''•' and demands of all persons whomsoever. `ti WITNESS their hands this ' ' day of April, 1965. WHO . ��oo,r �// n s n t 4 z.P- (yJJ�' � t, - STATE OF OREGON »` ;,• County of ))) '',--.1.1'- On this ` - day of April, 1g65, before me, the :`w 'undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named EDWARD C. HUNZIKER and -- • • BABETTE HUNZIKER, who are known to me to be the individuals 11 i described in and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same freely and �? �s:_ voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and n' ":'^k affixed my official seal the day and year.last above written. • �`n sue• ,rim••• i / �`'; 6/6,-, ,��r,..s...'.7r ;i1=L e i 1 - �. I. .--/' /4"7 *4 Notary Public fo e 'f „�. _ ° .r" My commission expires: IC' 4`6-1• l ' $ °' �--0 a•mr • - !, ` � LC ` ak I %,.,,,. U •i!'�•- . FJ.d for r eeeid.......44.t.J._f..,�.......18 at.._...F.NL ++' ROGER THOMSSEN,Dicerto¢/of Roccrds&EIoctloun y 1 .' BOOK 548 PAGE 415 `:;ar �!:[ ` .^I,r'."1'' l '/. +-Aa.' L. , S.'1 4Ct, ar. ,4A„ 4:e.. r...a ._-� • 1 ?.r.,Yl fr..-.••� 7 's a A� "'f "� �'K AR- {�yry�kR�.�rS ,5�►�' '+ •7�+,• v,f• fi' + t t•'K•L�•• . «^ is»,'tutrr.."'�'at{Ls t''�#. n rj`4x yr .z,d wj ''. a .k x -, J ;F' r t�.S ..P h0 i� `1a{T�: ijGy ,, 'rte ''u i0"t ✓ti ,:ea fir e s `t r .v a ,t''. a r ' . it �- ,W4 X JSS" k t* 1 3}4 i`5- w 0 "•f..;:t.1 T ,1741�'=in..- , !q a i,-44• `.11.74 a'A at :,.' t• Fr�r.S .-xrh A .'e.,y ,, r r,44, 5-:;: 44,.eL�=H t A2.1f�+"•l..Lt�}-a: y' `i �• w-L ftti,.}'st x.'l`a�7 t".C�f1 ':. f,._ a .,z-x->ri s Y» r a s 1 ' 1.5"-, ,, ir'��+� rk 4.0.-.1-4...e. v,4 -;' .e > ,...?:•-.;,.._ r r < 1 �• 1•'•" i. ,,,L._..rr: r n •. a �is � ,..1.. 'relit 'z�;tit's=.r,�,,,,,,�`,Isf,r4-5,,' r,..-A ? '","_ ,4. ,t s s��a'cIS -4; Y •e y .a.r *. .t N y ,*,,,,"1: fr t,4 7+* PK'A ,4.Z.yti A144,1 J s"' •.� L fk`r•y's,,'•4^1'1'1-.'S) t•`^,.t ? e r el ve,k1,» , 5 Vri �Y3n... s .`.t.„,,,, . . t.-._.., a e r47,ti ,aj� AR ' i sfkov'ttte:,�1S.:.y t'....,-t Le i . c, fir.--- l44;� -y . • tl f J. : * .° . .. 44155 „',, --.?5'•• :"t Number: 3 SS1-67-1 eve.,-• 41,�a4 Deed fiefererxet 8.1.65,P.35 leas ' j S.421,p. 746 and •_�a-,,, ' `.. S. 548, F. 414 v'a` KNOW ALL nun icy TITEsE PRESENTS:tfiat we Ve...— _.__.._.______. ,Y� $ ED1•IhRD C,_Ii1J1�'I.IN311_431 .SAB�"ZTB l�I1NZIKERThu9�g tt1__at1� C�___ rr r he m2(ler termed granfortx), in consideration of the sum of$____33',•SQ_Gall,l$-• to Le pa(d by r,;, Cl'It OF TtGA!iD, a municipal corporation of Oregon, hereinafter termed tba City,hereby grant,bargain,sell . ,6•••-y old eonVey unto the Crl•Y o TtGAILD a periettul rteld•obway and easement ns he:ninaft;.; describtd, togeiher f'CaoSar.' :`4 �s"9,a., f�'f villa a ,,••:':,coot .::�ht.t.way and unsenseut to use an additional area hereinafter described and dcsigtmled .+F ;4 .x.:'7'��,1k1- lemiwr:'ry ca?enu•nt,fu;the following uses and purposes: `:4y:'"TtS t. ,,S�4,4s4V I. Perwcrua. casemeid: Z�"n. An wen cumbered Perpetual right-of-way and easemerd for the purpose of constructing,reton• n,' •r .trusting,oy:erattre:, maintaining,inspecting and repairing of o underground cower tine and ^IC. tr't# Ftc Y�•��}7!. 3yitN;t'te11a1S(C\,tU�i'fS1e:'with the right to remove,as necessary,'vegetation,foliage,teens and other y;�• uhttrnetiuns wit!ti,y tine casement area, but reserving to the grantors trio title to the lands, r' ?+ ?tr.' Isubject in the eosi ncent, a,d the right to make such use tlscresi,except to construct buildings, >.- , �c�•tai%F.-.rlA Yazd 4.:, t , . + .• as will not Interfere wtlL the was and purposes of the casement;said easement area being— T�? std'- t. 'Ex%=wirsct ie,=17l war--sa> aL-rto mgim-. ...ir�a^ "fg.tie ritted2etdelaill Yi tug' %hH r ''{1jy + 'Fn(amrhilel Stg.i3lcszrsem!SVP .45-5'ttiy A strip of land 15 feet in width Northeasterly of, parallel c=-= - �'r-. to, along ..nd within 15 feet cf the Northeasterly boundary r_-. of the Beaverton-Tigard Highway right of way, emending =. pry .0,00... i' from the Northerly line to the Easterly line of that certain ' -,?;• o err of the grantors as described in Deed Book l65 page °6Tr,Ttt property Y U , P o : c-;,z_' 35, Deed Records of Washington County, Ora•on. ,.s "u , ,ter! San Cm ee 4 tJCatr nea'%5'r mss: .1 zai._;, .y.;•44 6:t. `.' fry k ,-s." 1. Temporary easement: _ n• ,-; 'together wills the temporary right of Ingress, ccress and mgrrss,and we for rawer conatruc- and along the Northeasterly side .'i,&x."s.:; :a f 1 cars+ fe y? =:t"--T lion purposes,of additional lands lying parallel.to,itatanageb and with* et. .;..,.y - ' when measured at right angles, of the above described perpetual easement area,excepting and %,`yie7i . .3ki.L.". reserving to grantors the unencumhcrt.1 enjoyment, use and preservation at all structures ;};: y .• ; 5,4,*yY, �,t r,-. present upon q,e oremises. this !cmporary caaamcnt shall termtaste upoo completfaa o[the 4y,< ,. f1 sewer construction work. it which time, upon request of OLe owner,the City will Issue a r -.:•�+-±7:^' written release thereof. t'```'` 0. t y/..F%:�- . `$ r---r •cal Y cnan 653 PACE 59 M,,, _ 7rr._ _ '�ti'rrrAd-:-.na.:d::,5•t �e ':e r„i,o,=t.:';.i"'�s,- •`•,•, ,.'ct °1,F `t''� .P, 1 t'•.pf,. 1 i,! -'a-F .A•. 3.-..a a q `s vat `""rt - g XT �4 ' r - ., s•-as- r a n a,' , t ''I n. se ? t•t. Iv " n• s a "( h`,Z ' *�.{t n• a' K-rTr ` `i" 1. k` rT ;.:. 9 .) m, ,ir .'4r -R', ;3Pil.\,' . r 1rr "` ; -�Ats,•r a E txtap " �' , 1 _r r r ei is �iL i 5�ei Y`. ES i!1 t x4".r I Z . 4y P - S. 1, grs4••`11, Sit.:-�S j` , i 4;1,- -tw fl ` Sf � . :!, M{ • ..l r#1?3Z`2'T ,s g d ,' )r' Y � r..�• y, ; Syu s t i - . = a^Sssa � ,. +, tY • rfr.. 4, " 2V.A .+`a' . � :trl "33i a.;fr r 0SlaY4 .w + rW sC'i �� aY 0 3_, ' ' •,tusr[•x - ,, T�,, ,,,,,..9,„4:_ ,__ ,,..np :4,-! " • 41 ' f•"l4'+�,:,7,,4„1: .;" � "-.— ,;'.:5":0 7�q� ;,C._ 'r ;r _:iFf*Jos T-*wa. .t + p • f + tsY s �R ;+f „+-..�..'''=: rxzesr.,,+-s- s.-, ► ___ .-+: a"t ., s 'f" dre w'5..: rx.�--.•�F+ '! r.�`-.•1-.i• } U .-,.. ,,, ♦+ to [ .. I Al• . w , �l.x•-,.�±+ I'I'Ss� ,70 r°1'{,r'p � x r2�G 1«T5� ere14 , rv, ;•.-_xi``S.�w�r,r '�- •a¢�,�''C.. ...ry.+�Ww,e�4,C� .,.x +TY.ii,..:::s+ ..i. i f .rK. a �f d a 'tt.r • - �-e+- r i V :w r•w i 1.tf r t It. e 44155 • r ,5��/5 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ice% Fir: ,y*-'lv „-I' 1. The grantee shall cause to have t.,+o trees within the easement �,p”; �16. ' 'r.- ,�;� area cut and the useable portions thereof removed to the remainder �..•�,� ,, lands of the grantor for grantor's use. riPY a"''. +L+ r_r -= •F,',: 2. Grantee shall cause to have the trench refilled, compacted and '•&,,rte?; '. leveled at the time of comp_letion of sewer construction and ,;,�.•. t,:•.°a,zu shall further again refill the same after settling theiaof .-...'r,-"' t. with the intent that the ground surface shall be substantially ` restored to its pre-existing condition. k a-- as4-%. w• .r-rz-'-w.: : t f7�g 1_x e 1, .•5`? -t:•;q Should it be emissary la cut and remove any brush, trees,or other matter or materials from the easement ,.� area, mid brush, trees, or ether simper and materials shall be removed ant disposed of by the City and the liir r City shell leave Uao osmium area in a neat and workmanlike condition. Tim City agrees that In connection ,. t it,- with its nos of the perpetual enst¢aent area and in inaneeting,repairing,maintaining,or replacing said sewer i r !L I" Y 4 * , ' °I"''* Prod: SW Hunziker St. - LID =' 1 . Esmt: A/W #12 "=r 2220 Deed Ref.: 165/35 TL #100 (281 18D) b4xttT DEDICATION - a `1"`� '` +,f.'• " AND SLOPS EASEMENT . 1 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That ve (I) 9` Edward C. (deceased) & Babette Hunziker, husband and wife, Doris Hartig , personal representAtive for E.C. Hunziker and trustee for Babette Hunziker hereinafter termed grantor(s), in consideration of the sl.= 69.32 to be of $ paid by s� • the CITY OF TIGARD, a municipality of the State of Oregon hereinafter termed the City, or at the option of the City to be credited in part payment of Hunziker 4 Street improvement assessment against the , following, imp g� premises of which the followin . described areas form a part, (-4 - ,,.I. Grantors give, grant and dedicate unto the Public the following: - s 4• =:::A perpetual right-of-way and easement for public road, public street and public utility purposes to become a part of the public right-of-way of S.W. Hunziker Street on, over, across, along, .. : under and within that portion of that certain tract of Grantor(s) as described in Deed Book 165 at Page 35 , Deed Records of Washington County, Oregon, lying South of a line drawn , parallel to and thirty (30) feet North of, when measured at right angles of the following described center line of S.W. - Hunziker Street, said center line being described as follows: -- : Ia Wi lli the Wilam Graham Donation Iand Claim No. 39 in the North .e half of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette • 4 Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Begi*intng at a point on the center line of S.W. Hall Boulevard { located South 57° 16' o6" West 803.95 feet from a stone marking . the Northwest corner of the Wirit„m Graham D.L.C. #39; thence along the center line of S.W. Hunziker Street South 61° 11' 11" T. East 1989.59 feet to a point of curve; thence along the arc of - 1 a 200.00 foot radius curve to the left having a central angle of • lo° 57' 10" the chord of which bears South 66° 39' 46" East 38.17 Ymm A', feet (an arc distance of 38.23 feet); thence South 72° 08' 21" ., East 601.66 feet to a point of curve; thence along the arc of a 200.00 foot radius curve to the left having a central angle of . 18° 01' 18" the chord of which bears South 81° 09' 00" East 62.65 feet (an arc distance of 62.91 feet); thence North 89° 50' 21" East 188.90 feet to the terminus at Oregon State Highway station 1 "H" 449400.00 of the Beaverton-Tigard Highway Section, said terminus - being North 15° 18' 46" West 2660.19 ft. from a stone at the Easterly ; fir Southeast corner of the William Graham D.L.C. #39, and South 30° 4.4. 38' 12" West 1493.76 feet from a 2" iron pipe at the Northeast - T' i corner of-the William Graham D.L.C. #39, said 2" iron pipe also i. being the initial point of Hermoso Park Plat. q' i P r- N a: - ir o • ex ii } <•. , - _ ejo'1043 r,, f T74 _ - • I:. Grantors also hereby 2224 . . y grant, bargain, Bell and convey untooth . ^ 0 : City of Tigard the fallowingt T A permanent right-of-way and easement for the purpose of constructing, , "_ CA maintaining end/or repairing elopes, euta or fills occasioned by or K.1 resulting from the improvement of B.W. Huaziker Street, within an area • t: x..-` K described as.fallov s .:.ti:,: ,. ,. ,, _. . ,' , b� That portion of Grantor's lands as described in Deed gook 1-65 at Pegs 25 , Deed Records, Washington County, Oregon, r lying South of a line drawn parallel to and forty(,I,O)feet f North of, vnea measured at right angles, the center line of S.W. Hunziker Street, as described in Parcel I above described, reserving,-however, to Grantor, Beira and assigns t the full use and dominion over the said easement area; provided, hoio'rer, that such use shall not be permitted to interfere with the purpose for which the easement is granted. i • Should it be necessary to cut and remove any brush, trees, or 1"' other materials from the above deecribed easement area, the City ttt agrees that sane shall be removed and disposed of by the City «:• and the area left in a neat,and workmanlike condition. • Grantors do hereby warrant that they are the owneks in fee simple of the described . premises and have the right to grant the easement, hereinabove set forth. , *• WITNESS our hands and seals this 1 4th day of JULY , 197 5 1° r.A.e...AJ e 5;4,7., • ,,.,,_ (+A•) ii dX - R<L...,. ,.t •- (sFU) R' 1: i ..._.,, , ( )(,- ,,/_.:_ _ j --- �/ (so u.) Pr ,-.., 42,o_./..,011-,,....4c..--14.4r...-/-Lit, (SEAL)%Y....44 -- (SEAL) - • A. For a consideration, the mortgage lien on t. a.,,-„,-,ve described properties is - hereby make subordinate to the easements above granted. G' I - _ ti hated this day of .�*:: , 197 -i Mortgagee By - Title _ • :::I STATE OF OREGON ) 4 t s 1e «lQ�r w*tom m•aa +- } 55• � �r,o...asut yQ,ro...1 a.a.e.a s1 County of W Fi N ►V G,T C tJ ) ` T �aw*+ - ah - i. On this ''1 day of .f u LY , 1.97.5_, personally appeared t the above named C)ORi % H A RT I G and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. I , Before me: . :c �'1 Q�CLw .otaryt public for Oregon , my Commission Expires: 1} (q j -14 , i Accepted by the Tigard City Council en .'eotember a, 1975. . . - .i / /S City Recor • bOOF1043 Pr1tEY75 -- �, t coyy1P I A!c&rr&41V€A Vicinity Maps: 655 = - , rIGARD - a' 4 O grLyp FINN' s )/ iArHEE LEWIS CC A @ rn 4 CLItvTDM1I ±� 4 , t DARTM• �. A . 4 s W NUT v ELMNURSr `O + G " y RRQ P 1 ' r/ C X21 F fN n [ .; y : °EVELAND 'Q'..4011/ o• ,01 41001" i.--2,' ` 9 y _ r i]ERRl'DELL u �� t 40 PAMELA �'fr t ti CRES 4. ti PARK �C.) bC Od �° s YARNS TEII►pLE o Q J c' Z E OMARA 1- Vi r.f E ,.- SAND BURG EDGWOOD P.,:.GINA Z. HFLLUIE • / CE TER - MCDOIVA il MERLYNE // ELROSE CLoNYGRE.NK LAIVD'ARIt / "�t ° = 4JIJUStTA1h1V1EW ,, ; MEADOW' m if VIEW GREENS RD FAWO CREEK PROJECT SITE ,,�Ilk. SITE VICINITY MAP Il1 N.T.S. ■ CONSULTIN 503.222.4453 EIILATI1SE N G I N E E R Si ECEIVE� 503.248.9263 vlmk @vlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 IUN 0 8 2011 www.vlmk.com CITY OF TIGARD ANN444GIENCIN Rusg7IDC - Parking SDR Narrative May 16, 2011 Revised June 03, 2011 Project Narrative for Site Development Review submittal City of Tigard, Oregon Project: TDC - Parking Location: 8001 and 8005 SW Hunziker Road OVERVIEW: This site is located on the north side of SW Hunziker Road, adjacent to Highway 217. It is approximately 6.4 acres. We are proposing to expand the parking lots on both the north and south ends of the existing building. As part of this work we also propose to revise some of the existing parking areas to make them comply with city code standards. There are no new buildings proposed with this submittal, but we are proposing to remodel the entry at the south end of building B to make it more architecturally appealing and work better with the new parking lot. PROPOSED USES: This project consists of two large existing industrial multi-tenant buildings (A and B). They are currently occupied by industrial users (storage, manufacturing and office). As part of this parking lot expansion, we are not proposing to change the uses of the buildings. The areas and required parking are listed on the area summary table on sheet G1.0. SITE CONDITION: The subject property is currently zoned I-L (Light Industrial) and is occupied by two industrial (CMU) multi-tenant buildings. The site is surrounded by I-L zones. VEHICLE ACCESS: Primary vehicle access is accommodated off of SW Hunziker Road through an existing 50.0' wide common driveway and a common access easement located on the adjacent lot to the west. This driveway/access aisle also serves the existing building to the west. There is no work planned for the existing driveway as part of this project. We have prepared a sight distance certificate as part of the SDR submittal. TREE REMOVAL: This site will be removing (13) total trees of which only (7) are larger than 12" diameter. See section 18.790.050 below for response to tree removal permit requirements. UTILITIES: All existing utilities are to remain. The only new utilities are noted below. 1. Storm. We will grade the new parking lots as required to slope to new catch basins (see water quality) and pipe to the existing storm pipe in the SW corner of the site that leads to the existing ditch on the south side of Hunziker Road. 2. Detention. We are proposing a new StormTech underground detention system under the new south parking lot as required that will comply with city standards. File:G:\Acad2010\210498\01 Site Design Review\SDR-Narrative-3.doc Page 1 of 9 Printed: June 03,2011 TDC - Parking SDR Narrative 3. Water Quality. The existing water quality (WQ) swale is to be removed and replaced with a new StormFilter WQ manhole. All required WQ will be handled in the new StormFilter WQ manhole. No new WQ ponds are proposed. 4. Sanitary. None required. 5. Fire water: No changes proposed. 6. Domestic water: As part of this proposal, we will be replacing the existing domestic water service with new pipes to solve a maintenance issue. It will be re-routed to work with the detention facility. See sheet G3.0 7. Irrigation water: We will tie into the existing system (if one exists) as required for all new landscaping or supply new irrigation from the existing water lines on-site. 8. Lighting. The existing on-site lighting will remain for security purposes and new site lighting in the new parking lots will be added to be in compliance with design standards. COMPLIANCE WITH CITY CODE SECTIONS: The following will address the code sections that apply to the proposed work for this project. Please note the following: CHAPTER 18: A) Section 18.360.050(B) (Site Devel pment Review): This project is being submitted as a Site Development Review (SDR) because we do not comply with all of this section and are therefore considered a Major Modification. See notes below: 1) (Dwelling unit density)...this project is industrial...N/A 2) (Dwelling unit ratio)... this project is industrial...N/A 3) (On-site parking)...We are not making changes that require additional parking; we are adding parking to comply with city code parking minimums and general design layout. 4) (Structure type)...We are not changing the type of the existing structures...N/A 5) (Building height)...We are not changing the height of the buildings...N/A 6) (Affect on off-site parking)...We are not changing the on-site accessways and the parking areas are being re-designed to improve on-site traffic flow which will not affect off-site traffic. 7) (Traffic to and from site)...We are not proposing any changes that would affect traffic flow to and from the site. 8) (Increased floor area)...We are not proposing adding floor area to the buildings. 9) (Common open space)...We are reducing the common open space on this site by more than 10%; therefore, this proposal is a Major Modification. 10)(Project amenities)...We are proposing significant upgrades to the landscaping and adding a picnic area in the space between the buildings, which would add to the project amenities, not reduce...N/A 11)(SDR conditions)...Due to the age of the project, we are not aware of any conditions of SDR approval that would be modified. B) Section 18.360.090: Approval Criteria 1)This project does not include street utility work; therefore chapter 18.810 does not apply. 2) Buildings: The buildings on this project are existing, therefore this section (a, 1-4) does not apply. 3) (b) Trees...this project will save all the trees that are possible (see sheet G1.0), but the majority of existing trees are in the area of the new parking lots and/or grading areas and will need to be removed. See responses to chapter 18.790 below. 4) (c) Site Hydrology... File: G:\Acad2010\210498\01 Site Design Review\SDR-Narrative-3.doc Page 2 of 9 Printed: lune 03,2011 TDC - Parking SDR Narrative a) Water quality will be handles with storm filter catch basins per the preliminary site utility plan. Also, the site detention will be handled by underground Stormtech facility. b) We are not proposing pervious pavement for this project. c) We are not proposing soil amendment for this project. d) All roof runoff will be via downspouts and underground storm pipes to the storm system. e) We are not proposing any new fencing for animal control. f) The outdoor lighting on the building is existing and will remain. We are adding some additional site lighting to the new parking lots and they will be directed to stay on-site, but may spill into the "habitat area" on the north end of the site. g) The existing wetland areas and vegetated corridors (buffer) will remain undisturbed and the remainder of the site will be enhanced to improve the site landscaping. 5) Exterior Elevations: this project does not include single-family attached and multiple-family structures; therefore this section does not apply. 6) Buffering and screening: a) This project is surrounded by the same I-L zone and therefore, buffering/screening is not required. b) Other screening is as follows: 1. The parking areas are screened. 2. The screening is directed at the adjacent lots (all industrial). 3. The screening is accomplished with a line of shrubs per the site landscaping plan (L1.0). 4. The viewer can be either stationary or mobile. The new shrubs are continuous. 5. The plants are year round materials. 7) Privacy and noise: This project is industrial and is surrounded by all industrial properties; therefore, this section does not apply. 8) Private outdoor use: This project does not include multifamily use; therefore, it does not apply. 9) Shared outdoor recreation areas: This project does not include multifamily use; therefore, it does not apply. 10)Development within the 100-year floodplain: This project is located within the 100-year flood plain (see line on site plan - G1.0). It is all industrial property and is surrounded by all industrial properties. Currently, bike trails or pedestrian pathways within the flood plain do not exist. We are not proposing any new bike trails or pedestrian pathways as part of this project as they are not practical for this use. We are including new bike parking as required by city code and will be enhancing the site landscaping to improve the 100-year flood plain areas. 11)Demarcation for Crime prevention: This project is existing for the most part, but the new parking lots (north and south end of site) are designed to provide a safer more efficient use foe the employees and customers using them. a) This project will include a couple patios areas (with picnic tables) for employees to spend their lunch hours and are located in visible areas close to the buildings. b) This project does not include a trellis or arbor. c) This project is relatively flat and is visible from the main street (Hunziker) for the full depth of the site. d) This project does not include "paths" other than concrete sidewalks. File: G:\Acad2010\210498\01 Site Design Review\SDR-Narrative-3.doc Page 3 of 9 Printed: June 03,2011 TDC - Parking SDR Narrative e) The signage for this project will be done under a separate submittal, but will probably include a monument close to the street and addresses on the buildings. f) This site is proposing a significant amount of new landscaping to enhance and better define the existing landscape areas. 12)Crime prevention and safety: a) This project will include a remodel of the front building (B) that will add new windows to help with visibility of occupants. b) This project does not include interior laundry. c) The existing mailboxes will not be changed. d) This project already includes exterior lighting for any areas in question of crime. The new parking lots will include new site lighting. e) The new parking lots will include new site light poles that will illuminate all areas used by pedestrians. 13)Public Transit: a) SW Hunziker is on a bus route and there is currently a bus stop in front of the site. b) Per the pre-application meeting with the city, this project is not required to provide any public works, other than the street dedication. This would include bus stop shelters, turnouts for buses and connecting paths to the shelters. 14)Landscaping: a) The landscaping as been design per section 18.745. See notes below. b) This site is industrial (not multi-family) and is required to have (and meets) 15% landscaping. 15)Drainage: This site is designed to meets the city standards, which are assumed to be based on the 1981 master drainage plan. 16)Provisions for disabled: The buildings of this proposed development are existing and we are proposing to upgrade the ADA parking facilities, sidewalks and ramps to entries, etc. as required to improve the facility. These upgrades meet or exceed ORS chapter 447; and 17)This development is designed to meet the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone with no other modifications. C) Table 18.530.2: 1) We comply with all requirements of the I-L zone including minimum lot size, minimum lot width, minimum setbacks, maximum height, maximum site coverage and minimum landscaping. D) Section 18.705 (Access. Egress and Circulation): 1) The access and egress to this site off of Hunziker Road is an existing 50.0' driveway that is to remain unchanged. 2) 18705.30(F): The proposed revisions to the site will improve the pedestrian walkways from the building to the public street. 3)Table 18.705.3: a) The proposed site plan will have over 100 parking spaces and require (1) 50.0' wide driveway, which our existing driveway will comply. E) Section 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening.): 1) 18.745.040 (Street Trees): a) This project has more than 100 feet of frontage and will be required to plant street trees. The landscape plan is included in our SDR submittal that indicates the new street trees. b) The new street trees have been designed with the long term maintenance issue (sidewalks, utilities, etc.) in mind. c) Size and Spacing: File: G:\Acad2010\210498\01 Site Design Review\SDR-Narrative-3.doc Page 4 of 9 Printed:June 03,2011 TDC - Parking SDR Narrative 1. The proposed trees for this development are 2" caliper minimum. 2. Specific Size and spacing as follows: a. The proposed street trees are not small trees. b. The proposed street trees are medium-sized trees and are spaced at 30'-0" on center. c. The proposed street trees are not large trees. d. The proposed street trees are not located near an intersection and are held back from the existing private driveway. e. No new utility poles are proposed. f. The proposed street trees are not located near gas/water meters. g. No new water/gas meters are proposed. h. The proposed street trees are not located near a light standard. i. No new light standards are proposed. j. The proposed street trees are on the backside of the existing sidewalk and the existing power poles are between the sidewalk and the street. The proposed street trees should not interfere with the power poles at full maturity. k. The proposed street trees are on the backside of the existing sidewalk approximately 10'-0" from the street curb. And; I. The trees will be planted more than 2'-0" away from the sidewalk. i. The surface between the trees and the sidewalk is landscaping (native grass seed). ii. No sidewalk cut are proposed. d) Pruning: the proposed trees will be maintained along with the on-site landscaping. e) Cut/fill around trees: No existing trees are proposed for street trees. f) Replacement: No street trees exist on this project. All street trees shown are new. g) Granting adjustments: No adjustments are proposed. h) Intersections: The proposed street trees are not located near an intersection. 2) 18.745.050 (Buffering and Screening): Per Table 18.745.1, we are not required to provide buffering and screening because this site is surrounded by the same light industrial zone (I-L). Per the landscape plan, we are proposing to screen the parking areas. a) 18.745.050(B.5): Screening: 1. The proposed parking lots will be screened by an evergreen shrub that reaches 4-6' in height at full maturity. See the site landscape plan (L1.0). 2. No berms are proposed for parking lot screening. The parking lots will be screened by a continuous shrub per item 1 above. 3. No fences or walls are proposed for parking lot screening. The parking lots will be screened by a continuous shrub per item 1 above. b) 18.745.050(E.1 and E.4): 1. (E.1): Screening parking lots: a. The proposed parking lots will be screened by a continuous evergreen shrub that reaches 4-6' in height at maturity. b. Landscape islands are proposed adjacent to the parking lots to screen the appearance of parking. File: G:\Acad2010\210498\01 Site Design Review\SDR-Narrative-3.doc Page 5 of 9 Printed:June 03,2011 TDC - Parking SDR Narrative c. The landscape plans indicate a continuous shrub, ground cover and trees adjacent to the parking lots to achieve a balance between high and low landscaping. d. The parking areas have been designed to comply with the 1:7 tree ratios and are indicated in the landscape islands. e. The landscape islands are a minimum of 6.0' wide and are surrounded by concrete curbs. f. (E.4): screening refuse containers: The proposed enclosed refuse containers will be screened from view by both a chain link fence with slats and a continuous evergreen shrub per the site landscape plan (L1.0). F) Section 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). 1) 18.755.040(A): This proposal is required to have 720 sf. of garbage enclosures based on the use (6 sf./1,000 for industrial) and we are proposing to be below that size, therefore we are required to comply with item 4 (Franchise Hauler review). We have asked Pride Disposal to review this and have attached a letter of their approval to this Narrative. 2) (Current and projected use): a) (Recycling)...This project currently uses (4) large containers (2-each building) for recycling. They are approximately 10' x 20' and are picked-up and dumped every other Wednesday. They contain non-combustible recycled material (plastic and metal). b) (Garbage)...We are proposing to install (2) new garbage enclosures that are 11.5' x 23' (529 sf. total) with chain link fence with slats and gates. These will be used for both recycling and garbage dumpsters. 3) 18.755.040(F): a) (Applicability)...The existing facility is currently served by Pride Disposal, which is the hauler that approved the plan. b) (Description)...Pride Disposal has reviewed the plans and the approval letter is part of our submittal package. c) (Application of method)...This project's use of large containers for recycling and very little garbage needs requires us to use the Franchised Hauler review method. The requirement for 720 sf. of garbage enclosures is not feasible for this site or the current tenant's use. d) (Review procedure)...we have worked through the sizes, locations and type of garbage enclosures with Pride Disposal for their approval. 4) 18.755.050(B-D): b) Location standards: 1. The proposed garbage enclosures include BOTH recycling and garbage containers. 2. The outdoor garbage enclosures will be enclosed and the containers will have lids to comply with the IBC and IFC codes. 3. The proposed exterior garbage enclosures will be sized to contain both recycling and garbage. We are proposing to have (2) locations. 4. The proposed garbage enclosures are located adjacent to the loading docks and are not in any required setbacks. 5. The proposed garbage enclosures are located in the center of the site adjacent to loading docks and mandoors where they will be best used by tenants. File: G:\Acad2010\210498\D1 Site Design Review\SDR-Narrative-3.doc Page 6 of 9 Printed:lune 03,2011 TDC - Parking SDR Narrative 6. The proposed garbage enclosures are not located in a parking area, but are close to the loading docks for easier garbage hauler pick-up. 7. The proposed garbage enclosures are located adjacent to the loading dock and a large truck maneuvering area for easier garbage hauler pick-up. c) Design Standards: 1. The proposed garbage enclosures have been designed to meet with garbage hauler requirements and contain the correct size containers for the tenant's use. 2. The proposed garbage enclosures will have containers that are covered to meet IBC and IFC code requirements. 3. The proposed garbage enclosures will be surrounded by a 6'-0" high chain link fence with slats and are sized to meet the garbage hauler requirements. 4. The containers used will be marked as recycling or garbage as required. d) Access Standards: 1. The proposed garbage enclosures are located adjacent to the loading docks and mandoors for quick easy tenant access and garbage hauler pick-up. 2. The proposed garbage enclosures are located adjacent to the loading docks for easy garbage hauler pick-up. 3. The proposed garbage enclosures are located adjacent to the loading docks and large truck maneuvering areas for easy garbage hauler pick-up. G) Section 18.765 (Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements): 1) 18.765.020(C): The proposed site plan is designed to comply with the current uses of the building and no change to the uses is proposed. We are proposing to upgrade the parking to comply with the city's minimum parking requirements. 2) 18.765.030(B): The proposed parking lots are within 500 feet of the property line. 3) 18.765.030(D): The site plan includes a table indicating the requirements for each use in the buildings and the minimum parking required. We are proposing to meet or exceed these requirements. 4) (Maximum): This project includes manufacturing (main use) and the requirement for maximum parking allowed according to table 18.765.2 (Zone A) is NONE. Therefore, we do not have a requirement of maximum parking. The site is required to have 132 spaces minimum and we are proposing 156 spaces. 5) 18.765.030(F): The proposed site plan indicates the required 5% carpool/vanpool parking stalls. 6) 18.765.030(G): The proposed site plan indicates the required minimum disabled- accessible parking stalls based on chapter 11 in the 2009 IBC. 7) 18.765.040(B): As stated in section C) above, the site is served by an existing 50.0' wide driveway. 8) 18.765.040(H): The new proposed parking lots will be paved with asphalt paving to match the existing parking lots. 9) 18.765.040(3): For the most part, the proposed parking lots have been designed to accommodate parking stalls that do not require wheelstops. In order to do this, we have designed the space with a 3.0' overhang beyond the face of the curb that will be low landscaping and is not counted toward our landscape percentage for the site. The few parking stalls with wheelstops have been shown on the site plan and comply with this section. 10)18.765.050 (Bicycle Parking): File: G:\Acad2010\210496\01 Site Design Review\SDR-Narrative-3.doc Page 7 of 9 Printed: June 03,201.1 TDC - Parking SDR Narrative a) Bicycle parking is shown on the proposed site plan based on the minimum required in Table 18.765.2. H) Section 18.790.050 (Permit Applicability) 1) 18.790.050(A): Removal permit required Tree removal permits shall be required only for the removal of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as defined by Chapter 18.775 (see below). a) Sensitive lands are lands potentially unsuitable for development because of their location within: 1. The 100-year floodplain or 1996 flood inundation line, whichever is greater; a. This site is in the 100-year floodplain. We are removing (1) tree that is over 12" diameter and (3) trees less than 12" diameter. 2. Natural drainage ways; a. The natural drainage way is adjacent to this site (off-site) on the west side. 3. Wetland areas which are regulated by other agencies; a. There is wetland on the north end of this site, east side of the site and off-site to the west. We are not proposing to remove any trees within the wetland. 4. Steep slopes of 25% or greater and unstable ground; a. This site does not contain steep slopes and we are not proposing to remove any trees in areas of steep slopes. 5. Significant fish and wildlife habitat; a. The habitat area is located on the north end of the site adjacent to highway 217. We are proposing to remove (1) tree over 12" diameter and (1) tree less than 12" diameter in the habitat area. b) Removal of tree must not have measurable negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters or water quality as evidenced by an erosion control plan which precludes: 1. Deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or similar material exceeding l/2 cubic foot in volume on public streets, adjacent properties, etc. a. The areas of tree removal on this site will have very little impact on erosion and none of the items mentioned will be leaving the site (streets, adjacent property, etc.). 2. Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soils; a. The removal of trees on this site will not affect the flow of water on bare soil. c) Within stream or wetland corridors, as defined as 50 feet from boundary of the stream or wetland, tree removal must maintain no less than a 75% canopy cover or no less than the existing canopy cover of the existing canopy cover is less than 75%. 1. There are no trees proposed to be removed within the wetland corridor. I) Section 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards): 1) 18.810.030: Per our discussions with the city, we are not required to provide any Public Work Improvements with this project other than noted below. a) 18.810.030(E): Per our pre-application meeting in January, we will be required to provide a 7.0' wide dedication along Hunziker Road for future street widening. 2) 18.810.050: We are not proposing any new easements with the current project. All existing easement will remain in place. File:G:Wcad2010\210498\01 Site Design Review\SDR-Narrative-3.doc Page 8 of 9 Printed:June 03,2011 TDC - Parking SDR Narrative 3) 18.810.070: The proposed site plan indicates new sidewalks along the new disabled-accessible parking stalls and along the building. a) Because we are not required to provide any Public Works Improvements, we will not be doing new sidewalks and/or planter strips along the street frontage. 4) 18.810.100 (Storm Drainage): The proposed parking lot expansion will be sloped to drain to the existing storm system and include water quality catch basins and storm water detention. 5) 18.810.120 (Underground all overhead utilities): We have reviewed the feasibility to underground the overhead utility lines with the utility companies that serve this site (both PGE and Frontier). Based on the costs associated with doing this work and the fact that some of the poles cannot be removed, we are proposing to pay the fee-in-lieu-of for this project. Per our discussions with city engineering staff, the fees associated with this site will be $35.00/I.f. for both the street frontage lines and the on-site lines on the west side of the building. File: G:\Acad2010\210498\01 Site Design Review\SDR-Narrative-3.doc Page 9 of 9 Printed: June 03,2011 i 5' k) borhooct A e e.,41 0 5 A a+er la f s AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING/POSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE,TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT&COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: r I I, v1,1 "r (4✓i.J ,being duly sworn,depose and say that on the U day of , 20 ` ,I ause to 1 t each o e ersonsi o'n the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a propose development at (or near) f �t VIZ V.--4,/— ,a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereo . I further state that said notices were enclosed in a to s p • y address-• to said,pers ns/and were deposited pa the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at i 1� 1 CAYVI 1/1/1 , with postage prepaid thereon. C. (4Y--11/1,1 ' 14 09- c `� Signa 4 (In i e presence of a Notary blic) POSTIN�G,�:/ I, Vi l T"Y Vi Wt( ,do affirm that I am(represent)the party initiating interest in a proposed land use application for Lt1 affeCi1'1i1gg located t(state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s)and all tax lot(s)currently registered) �1�C.7U h a/pit/ Aid on day of ,20, VI personally post notice indicating that the site maybe proposed for a#' f" 1(AO land use application,and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal f 14-140 The sign was posted at '�l t°0 b C�`^' � ✓r'' vi psi--r- p voreit 4 -4v1 z.Ire -Told-' (state location you posted notice o ropers}) Sig re ( n the presence of a Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF 0(-cgo r ) County ofu lfr►oma h ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affimled before me on the //4-A day of Ao r,' I ,20 /1 . s OFFICIAL SEAL i„ •„ . SUSAN B C-OREG1' -4i� LC/le ��� NOTARY PUBLIC-0OREGON .)6_,Nil COMMISSION NO.440.434 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 12,2013 NOTARY PUBLIC OF REGON My Commission Expires: 8_42 -/3 is\curpin\masters\neighborhood meetings\affidavit of mailing-posting neighborhood meeting.doc Page 5 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE THE FOLLOWING NOTICE SHALL BE READ TO ATTENDEES AT THE BEGINNING OF A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. This meeting is regarding (project name) ,located at (project location) , and is being held as required by the City of Tigard development review process. The purpose of this meeting is to inform neighbors of the project as currently planned. This meeting is not a decision forum and is not to approve or disapprove the project in whole or in part. It is to share information regarding the project and to solicit constructive input from neighbors and affected property owners. Application for the project being discussed here has not yet been submitted to the City. Therefore, the project will be at various stages of planning and some details may not be available at this time. Property owners of record within 500 feet should have received neighborhood meeting information and a list of frequently asked questions along with the notice of this meeting. This meeting is not attended by city staff in order to encourage dialogue between the developer and affected neighbors. Your comments and questions will be taken down and submitted with the application for consideration by the city planning staff. Property owners within 500 feet will be notified after a complete application is submitted. They will be provided an opportunity to comment. Any appeals are decided based on the provisions of applicable laws and the development code. For questions regarding the development review process,please contact the City of Tigard Planning Department. For project details,you will need to contact the developer. is\curpin\masters\neighborhood meetings\neighborhood meeting statement of purpose.doc Page 6 • • CONSULTING P 503.222.4453 ENGINEERS F 503.248.9263 F vlmkwimk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • OR • 97239-4393 w www.vlmk.com April 11, 2011 RE: Tigard Distribution Center Dear Interested Party: VLMK Consulting Engineers is representing the owner/developer of the Property located at 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road/25101BD00200. The owner/developer is proposing Site Development Review to expand the parking lots on both the north and south ends of the existing building. Part of this work will include revising some existing parking areas to comply with City Code Standards. In addition, the south end of Building B will be remodeled to make it more architecturally appealing and work better with the new parking lot. This work will also include upgrades to the south elevations of Building B. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary Land Use approvals,we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meetiag.on: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 City of Tigard Chamber of Commerce-Pearson Room 12345 SW Main Street,Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:00-7:00 pm This will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing our proposal with you. Please feel free to contact Jennifer Kimura at 503.222.4453 or email at jenniferk @vlmk.com with any questions. Sincerely, i , Jennifer Kimura VLMK Consulting Engineers End: Vicinity Map • � ‘.....x' * `J ' t., X06 \ Li �? .0.1/4,. ., k p � t°'; fi .✓i 4L' J' f••N.. V r N.. L 2 Xo 2, " .1 t }�� `, ' � } s• 1M1ti 4:4,.. i 5 :-s. ' ' ' 'T* b ' Zi: ' NI' *` :ir-'140r: --•...,.-:10:-.;;;;.:ilf.0-:::i-• i N` a O f • r� ry -- ..., w. ssj ` •. � Y{ •*lRMI... s "I" fin•- ry. .yt `.'y. u Il i ' f' it ` i;F, •Q .,�j� ` i F'RCA ti rN 1 r . . .1 / ,,� '_S/,i ....... ice: (,,,..,k,,..v,,,:t...:3 i—. N, . , ,....!1!...:..... ..‘ 1,1'4 '''',( ,•:„....,....,„, •.•„ ..„..i•;,„,,,, ,t;.„c.:::..... , y_ Y ii, ..:k,'... S 4:,... f AAbp 2.. s` Z !CL7l:�A( p F C;iiN J iii ,,•,.... . r, . „...... ,...., a-1-:(C SE '0', 4s< • s, I,4 :11 Ctig a tar • 'a is: NG s' •.---"-::‘;:.:.;I '„,_.'-:::„:,"i3:' {,l,•3 } � •. ! k ts �tiv PROJECT SITE .�. SITE VICINITY MAP illii ,;, , IF a� N.1.S. ,I�z.rw( v.:,7f.00,1 day,$.2*O RMak ik M4 2S1018D00105 1010001100 AK FLORIDA OUTDOOR INC FI ,F W REVOCABLE LIVING BY CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR 114 VENPORT 715 NE EVERETT ST RTLAND.OR 97201 PORTLAND,OR 97232 2S1018D00104 101CA001rr CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR FIEL: - r W REVOCABLE LIVING 715 NE EVERETT ST 11• . ri ::VENPORT PORTLAND,OR 97232 •IRTLAND,*1 97201 10180001 2S101CA00700 CL NNEL OUTDOOR GOULD FAMILY PROPERTIES VI!LC 71 ERETT ST BY TURRETT STEEL INDUSTRIES INC RTLAND,OR 97232 527 ATANDO AVE CHARLOTTE.NC 28206 S101BD001 2S101C800100 R NNEL OUTDOOR HUTTIG,INC 71 RETT ST 555 MARVILLE CENTER DR ORTLAND, R 97232 PO BOX 1041 CHESTERFIELD,MO 63006 2S10181301201 2S101BC00101 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION KNEZ REALTY GROUP LLC PROPERTY TAX DEPT 111 12301 SE HWY 212 999.LAKE DR CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 101BA00200 2S101BC00100 C CO WH• SALE CORPORATION KNEZ,JOHN S SR&JEANNE M PROP'` AX DEPT 111 12301 SW HWY 212 999 E r- CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 I' AOUAH, • 98027 25101B000200 2S101BA00101 CVG OREGON LLC PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES LP 7800 WALTON PKWY 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 NEW ALBANY.OH 43054 PORTLAND,OR 97224 25101A802700 2S1018D00300 EAGLE HARDWARE&GARDEN.INC PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING GROUP IN ATTN.TAX DEPT(TA3) 16400 COLLEGE BLVD PO BOX 1111 LENEXA,KS 66219 NORTH WILKESBORO,NC 28656 251018000301 2S101CA00400 EAST SIDE VAN&STORAGE INC RUSSELL FAMILY LIVING TRUST 4836 SE POWELL BLVD DAWN NEW HUNZIKER LLC PORTLAND,OR 97206 WELLS APARTMENTS LLC ET AL EAST:WENATCHEE,WA 98802 2S101D800300 25101A80+500 FIELDS,FRED W REVOCABLE LIVING SJP LLC 1149 SW DAVENPORT 7615 SW BEVELANO RD PORTLAND.OR 97201 TIGARD.OR 97223 01E3000 Ti • -e TY OF 131 S •LL T ARO,OR 97223 2S101CA00200 WALL STREET INDUSTRIAL LLC A RICHARD VIAL EXECUTIVE CENTER LLC 7000 SW YARNS ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101B801400 WALTON CWOR PARK BC 8 LLC BY CTMT-WALTON RE TAX 4678 WORLD PARKWAY CIR ST LOUIS.MO 63134 2S101AC01900 WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC00103 WETLANDS CONSERVANCY INC PO BOX 1195 TUALATIN,OR 97062. • Mifdren Design Group Nathan and Ann Murdock Attn: Gene Mifdren PO Box 231265 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Susan Beilke 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci Dayle D. & Evelyn 0. Beach 11285 SW 78th Avenue 11530 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Shannen Williams Rappold Norris Beggs & Simpson Marketing/Business Development Manager Perlo Construction 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 7190 SW Sandburg Street Portland, OR 97204 Portland, OR 97223 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard. OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway. Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 a VLMK CONSULTING ' !!!om E N G I N E E R S 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 www.vlmk.com TDC - Parking Neighborhood Meeting Notes 4-28-11 City of Tigard Attention: Cheryl Caines Regarding: TDC— Parking Neighborhood Meeting Meeting date: 4-27-11 Cheryl, Prior to the meeting, I received a call from Keith Ashcroft, who is the neighbor to the west of our property. He stated that he would like to attend the meeting, but due to a family emergency could not make it. We discussed the project and he expressed his two main concerns (wetland impact and storm water run-off). I explained to him that we are not proposing to impact the existing wetland or the buffer. I also explained to him that the city requires us to provide detention and we will not be allowed to have any additional storm run-off than is currently leaving the site. At the meeting, there was one person attending (Glenna Thompson) and she was there on behalf of a neighbor that could not make the meeting. After reading the Statement of Purpose and explaining the proposed project to her, she said the neighbor's only concern was how we are impacting the wetland and I explained to her, as I did for Keith, that we are not impacting the wetland. Overall, it was a short meeting and it went well. I have attached a copy of the sign-up sheet as requested. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you, eC Bill G. Lambert Associate 1 Structural Engineering•Civil Engineering•Industrial Engineering•Planning•Studies/Evaluations•Entitlement 4 • Sign In Sheet — 8001-8005 SW Hunziker - TDC Neighborhood Meeting Name Address Phone #/Email /.Pn na` D Ps l36 SCeJ¢/a��lcaD 563 a- ClcanWater Services Ow commitmcni is cleft. CWS File Number Service Provider Letter 09-000047 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R&O 07-20). Jurisdiction: Tigard Review Type: No Impact Site Address 8001 SW Hunziker ST SPL Issue Date: May 13, 2011 /Location: Tigard, OR 97223 SPL Expiration Date: May 12, 2013 Applicant Information: Owner Information: Name JENNIFER KIMURA Name KARL KLOKKE Company VLMK CONSULTING ENGINEERS Company Address 3933 SW KELLY AVENUE Address 1109 N. 21ST STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97239 BOISE, ID 83702 Phone/Fax Phone/Fax E-mail: E-mail: Tax lot ID Development Activity 2S101 BD00200 Parking Lot Expansion Pre-Development Site Conditions: Post Development Site Conditions: Sensitive Area Present: [ ] On-Site X Off-Site Sensitive Area Present: X On-Site X Off-Site Vegetated Corridor Width: Variable; 9-25 Vegetated Corridor Width: Variable; 9-25 Vegetated Corridor Condition: Degraded Enhancement of Remaining Vegetated Corridor Required: Square Footage to be enhanced: 1672 Encroachments into Pre-Development Vegetated Corridor: Type and location of Encroachment: Square Footage: None 0 Mitigation Requirements: Type/Location Sq. Ft./Ratio/Cost No Mitigation Required 0 X Conditions Attached X Development Figures Attached (1) Planting Plan Attached Geotech Report Required This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. Page 1 of 6 CWS File Number [09-000047 In order to comply with Clean Water Services water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: 1. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area or Vegetated Corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed in R&O 07-20, Chapter 3. 2. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the Vegetated Corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the Vegetated Corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by R&O 07-20, Section 3.06.1 and per approved plans. 3. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide Clean Water Services or its designee (appropriate city) with copies of all DSL and USAGE project authorization permits. No Activity Authorized. 4. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon. 5. Prior to ground disturbance, an Erosion Control Permit is required from the City. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for Erosion Control, in accordance with Clean Water Services' Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual, shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 6. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from Clean Water Services or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. 7. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 5.10. 8. Removal of native, woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable. 9. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by Clean Water Services, the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 10. For Vegetated Corridors up to 50 feet wide, the applicant shall enhance the entire Vegetated Corridor to meet or exceed good corridor condition as defined in R&O 07-20, Section 3.14.2, Table 3-3. 11. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the applicant shall provide the City with a Vegetated Corridor enhancement/restoration plan. Enhancement/restoration of the Vegetated Corridor shall be provided in accordance with R&O 07-20, Appendix A, and shall include planting specifications for all Vegetated Corridor, including any cleared areas larger than 25 square feet in Vegetated Corridor rated "good." 12. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the Vegetated Corridor shall be removed per methods described in Clean Water Services' Integrated Pest Management Guide, 2009. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native tree and shrub species. 13. The City or Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of enhancement/restoration activities. Enhancement/restoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements (R&0 07-20, Appendix A). 14. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 2.11.2. If at any time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80% survival level, the owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the two-year maintenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting. Page 2 of 6 CWS File Number 09-000047 15. Performance assurances for the Vegetated Corridor shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 2.06.2. Table 2-1 and Section 2.10, Table 2-2. 16. Clean Water Services and the City shall require an easement over the Vegetated Corridor conveying storm and surface water management to Clean Water Services or the City that would prevent the owner of the Vegetated Corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor and any easements therein. FINAL PLANS 17. Final construction plans shall include landscape plans. In the details section of the plans, a description of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution, condition and size of plantings, existing plants and trees to be preserved, and installation methods for plant materials is required. Plantings shall be tagged for dormant season identification and shall remain on plant material after planting for monitoring purposes. 18. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on final plans including methods, responsible party contact information, and dates (minimum two times per year, by June 1 and September 30). 19. Final construction plans shall clearly depict the location and dimensions of the sensitive area and the Vegetated Corridor (indicating good, marginal, or degraded condition). Sensitive area boundaries shall be marked in the field. 20. Protection of the Vegetated Corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provided by the installation signage between the development and the outer limits of the Vegetated Corridors. Signage details to be included on final construction plans. This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-approved site plan is attached. Please call (503) 681-3653 with any questions. Amber Wierck Environmental Plan Review Attachments (3) Page 3 of 6 0114100047 CW$Fl la Number I 1 O,e .0 O' '/ 1. .,,o''' --■= 3-4)—•■2 �y�p �/ _ 0 D a 120 �\G '4'' / SCALE 1N FEET S+r,P /, --WETLAND CONTINUES OFFSITE GOB •.r3 /' - - :::::•:.;•. y •0 /' ,�'�� 'wl�oTtiireliell--G-II®�I� • ' I dl`•°---- VEGETATED .. • ' / BOUNDARY �� / `�e/ Olt.._ ' _ bull , . 4. • / g \ \... mil -.. --- 7 .-, . . , ,,',:,1/44 .se.•___._._ ' ...k _ IN . 1• ..iii mii m' i^ -iii :„.......-: A ott.ti i MIN MN KIN MIN •1111 rj 1 111 ■1■ .II■ .1■ III. < j:J •1. •1■ .II. ■1■ ■II. . _ ; i .n• .1■ ■. .. 1111 .I■ .1. ■. .1. •1■ C • . • L1. ■1. .P. ■1. 2I1. 1. 1711■ ■1.II f I■1 .1. ■il. ■t■ .II. a. •1■ .1. !' 1 .1. .7. 1t■ ■n. .1. ..0 ■1. ■1. ■1. ■n■ •t■ U. .1. •1• ■1. »»j•. •"� 71. 11. ■II■ .1■ .II. .1. ■1■ ■1. 1. I.1. ■1. f ..yy• t 'L •1 I . .1. l� �I SLOPE I� :: B \•F� I I . $ r 6.I<:: # ".,s,--',1 ' 1 1 lidiiiiii ....Q. — ''•••:.-.. E r _ , IS --- — 7 _ I ( ",r'\l EXISTI G DEVELOPMENT sr+ PLANT COMMUNITY A PLANT COMMUNITY s LE p, 6 -c)06`)4•- (I 65 SF/0.004 AC) (657 SF/0.02 AC) HERBACEOUS/DEGRADED .............. DEGRADED Approved PLANT COMMUNITY B I WETLAND DATA "•INTS Clean Water Services (850 SF/0.02 AC) ext_E�JIRcoNi-L EN-I-sib_ge LEA`' .. : HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY/ 0 VEGETATION DAT SijINT. S ()ate .r/I 311 DEGRADED - I PHOTODOCUMEN - -- ••• 'I'C- Al r,1z-t4ME.JJ 1 of 3 4/11/11 Detail of Plant Communities A, B, and C at the Tigard Distribution FIGURE 4773 Center on Hunziker Road in Tigard, Oregon. Base map provided 2A f by VLMK Consulting Engineers, 2011. ! :>, Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Mt..I C%n .-..a.,..na-n.nell.eM7n»n..■..4.5,4,....»•+n...111JI..R■..I.....1.1 CleanWate Services Our commitment i ;Isar. CWS File Number 09-00047 GsZ' O� 5�' EXISTING BUILDING ,a' 4%/ !, 1'- t J �' - /; ' —WETLAND CONTINUES OFFSITE �c�, _ _ ' I 4.-, A•:,/,. ' ,r VEGETATED CORRIDOR BOUNDARY �� . '� //. • C41• •VEGET .,GDRRIDOrcr'UNCA••OW EXISTING DEVEI7DPNENT « __ _ ^�' I . / �( / - .,°� sus ` o�4'G L r I j 1 (t'�►i iai + 1:w 'n :'1 1iV c!1i _ I I l /./. ��/.' iVEGETA II+, 'pun � ,, ,� 1�1 --\\\.IP. • COKRIDO � — ` r I r� 'I 1 1 . •Yom.......,,_„__../ .. -! . . i: i is • �./ _ 'Y'�i} •I• :i: •• •i• • II :I: •i• Q: i• I + E I�I NM t ) .'• •i• •• . i m °'J _- �J-_11_x. / / /Q wos\_, � j o �/ ` _ h� I �� y ---- Gy.'Lr r 1X1 r �'-IEI MIllfr, RI G• +EI [ti I• . _.::an. t •elliaillirdiliiiii iiir 9i Ni. Jill�� `°; EXISTING DECO. ME 110111 En'`�ri Ell �� ME y - _ -- ' 1111111 11111 �-1 1 1 ! � ' .,/,., , �---EXISTING DEVELOPMENT `t. I ■ --.. AYPROXIMAT-e\, a o —' •15K XIMATE— ------ - -�-+ VEGETATED ± / • WETLAND ° , WETLAND `` CORRIDOR o 111111■ BOUNDARY—` , , '•••.BOU,N DARy ) >, • • � / \ 11—"--j / / ----- ( • j EXISTING BUILDING ^—`" k ONSITE WETLAND �. O. G - Odd J F: :-'���-1 (2,028 SF/0.05 AC) \\ ) Approved :: ONSITE VEGETATED CORRIDOR Clean Water Services �2Enl��2clhltitEtilT r=.-J (1,672 SF/0.04 AC) L .._ ---...... 4-c_ : .:i 4a eo tee �_.. \�, --�`--- � BY A w . -.,Date , I ° . ............L..„.3.. SP( R7r-,4z.H.K, -„i-r a dF. 3 SCALE FEET FIGURE 473 Existing conditions at the Tigard Distribution Center on Hunziker Road in Tigard, Oregon. Base map provided by VLMK Consulting Engineers, 2011. 4/11/" See Figure 2a for detail of plant communities. 2 P S ii " Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. ,age 5 of 6 09-000047 CWS File Number kG� O\ CP O EXISTING BUILDING 4,e- - / ' 4 ti, .1—WETLAND CONTINUES OFFSITE ____ _ __ ii � 1 /rI. ...- /;<2i d . � ! i I r — I Arm A -az �._, �4: [, f _ 1 i � .•, L!± '. C .� _ni ups as VET AT u I v a ...-1 r I Ir C� sip . COii►!.O- _ - ■ / ' BO:91.A _.. I I I �� PRO-•.EP 14.Af' _ ,vv _I I r. � l; )/�v i r „r •■,. EXP•� • SIO, I / X.‘,.:," 7 ! a RR -a r a ■ ■u �.. n■ m n■ ::! I, S 1 :. ■i■ ■ ■r■ n■ ■:1 t- ili, I J■ - �� I 11.1 I .... ...-/ :::::, , -----,-, ec,.? `2 ■ +� _ _a c:�_e� mso�r uc .iII 4 _ _. , 111111.--;?;- c...:-jp _ •.';'.. / i ILI wail—MP_i Ohba."' , --- • • ,,,,, ---4a.:---....________ •g,-, —ft---EXI ING DEVELOPMENT- . � - ` � PKOXI MATE-�`� I l n PP�OXIMATE�••---•_- ETLAND "'� WETLAND .ti VEGETATED } , / OUNDARr- ;CORRIDOR` 1 Mil % / •� BOUNDARY 1 I i-------------i / , ( ..,...........„,. ONSITE WETLAND %..� EXISTING BUILDING �� O. (Y - - (2,028 SF/0.05 AC) A roved e'� pp ::::::.,.:.:.k::.: ONSITE VEGETATED CORRIDOR ��•„ Clean Watt r Serv1.4,_ ,2 EJ �a rdo P--> - ' • (1,672 SF/0.04 AC) ti,,- # By Date 3'1I 3 Iii • . .. ao 100 �.-��-1�_ ...a.. ._ate '�—a,!r �11-1�.ilala ■a ■� — �.`� SPA a-rrgk. ,�,..g,,,r 3 0 F 3 SCALE IN MST L 4773 FIGURE 4/11/11 Proposed parking lot expansion at the Tigard Distribution Center on Hunziker Road in Tigard, Oregon. Provided by VLMK Consulting Engineers, 2011. See Figure 5 for preliminary grading plan associated with development of the north parking lot. • PHS Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. V WJTOCAD\4700\4773Vig wosn\FIG 2 AND 414g abulLdwq 4/17/2011 L37:37 Md.Tabloid,LI i Arboct' st Re_por+ 1 Oce-rd 2414‘‘41- -- • Tree Preservation, Inc. 4018 N.Colonial Ave.I Portland,OR 97227 503.704.8024 I www.overlooktree.com LICENSED,BONDED&INSURED CCB#176365 CERTIFIED ARBORIST PN-0742AT May 9, 2011 Reference: Tigard Distribution Center Location: 8001 SW Hunziker Rd. Tigard, OR Contact: Mr. Bill Lambert VLMK Consulting Engineers I have reviewed the tree preservation site plan and approve of the changes. If you require further technical assistance, please feel free to contact me at 503-704-8024. Sincerely, Kevin MacKenzie Overlook Tree Preservation, INC. Certified Arborist # PN-0742AT CCB#176365 • 7 01)C-4 "`1. Tree Preservation, Inc. 4018 N Colonial Ave.I Portland,OR 97227 April 26, 2011 503 704 8024 1 www overlooktree corn LICENSED,BONDED&INSURED CCB#176365 CERTIFIED ARBORIST PN-0742AT Reference: Tree Inventory Location: Tigard Distribution Center 8001 SW Hunziker Rd. Tigard,OR. Contact: VLMK Consulting Engineers Mr. Bill Lambert Phone: 503-222-4453/Fax 503-248-9263 I have visited the aforementioned address in order to provide a detailed Tree Inventory of several trees located on the property listed above. Each tree has been numbered and tagged from #1 through #27. They are located at diameter at breast height (DBH) of each tree. Most of the trees tagged are located at the west side of the commercial buildings ( A & B) and others have been tagged on the north and NE side of the buildings. This Tree Inventory is based on what is known as a visual tree assessment (VTA). No diagnostic tools were used during the inventory. Plans were provided by VLMK Consulting, and to the best of my knowledge, the trees that were tagged are within the building envelope, with exception of the pine and cottonwood trees located in the wetland area on the NE side of Building . These trees (13 of them) will NOT be affected by the proposed tree removal permits and will not be inventoried below. A All of the trees appear to be in good overall health. I found no visual defects or disease present in any of the (27) trees that were tagged on April 14, 2011 . The average limb spread of trees greater than 12" in diameter is approximately 30' feet. There are 9 trees proposed for removal and (3) trees designated for retention. For trees designated for retention, the following ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) guidelines can be followed in order to protect trees before and after construction: 1. Identify the root protection zones (RPZ's) of each tree and install protective fencing. 2. Install an organic layer of mulch, 3"-4" inches thick, within the RPZ to reduce soil compaction. 3. Deep root fertilize with organic bio-stimulants to help combat construction trauma. 4. Hire a Certified Arborist for any root pruning or possible root removal. Page 2. Reference: Tree Inventory Location: Tigard Distribution Center The following Inventory will include trees numbered #1 through #14 only. The list will include the location, species of tree and size of each tree. We will also detail the trees designated for possible removal and trees designated for preservation/retention. Tree #1 : Norway maple (Acer platanoides) 14"DBH. The tree is located at the front south entrance to the property. This tree is designated for removal. Tree #2: Black Pine (Pinus nigra) 15"DBH. The tree is located at the front right corner on the south side of Building X. This tree is designated for removal. Tree #3: Black Pine (pinus nigra). This is a co-dominant tree (one trunk with two stems) and is 25" DBH. It s located at the front right corner on the south side of (� Buildings The co-dominant leader has an inclusion and could result in stem or total tree failure because of the poor attachment of the two trunks. This tree is designated for removal. Tree #4: Red oak (Quercus borealis) 18"DBH. The tree is located on the west side of building A This tree is designated for removal. Tree #5. Red plum (Prunus americana) 4"DBH. The tree is located on the west side of building A. This tree is designated for removal. Tree #6. Red plum (Prunus americana) 4"DBH. The tree is located on the west side of buildings This tree is designated for removal. Tree #7. Red plum (Prunus americana) 4"DBH. The tree is located on the west side of building This tree is proposed for preservation/retention. Tree #8. Red plum (Prunus americana) 4"DBH. The tree is located on the west side of building A. This tree is proposed for preservation/retention. Tree #9. Paper bark maple (Acer griseum) 4" DBH. The tree is located on the west side of building A. This tree is proposed for preservation/retention. Page 3. Reference: Tree Inventory Location: Tigard Distribution Center Tree #10. Red maple (Acer rubrum) 6"DBH. The tree (not outlined on survey) is located on the SW corner of building,B'. It is unclear whether this tree has been designated for removal or retention? 't ,A A Tree #11. Big leaf maple (Acerjacrophylum) 8"DBH (volunteer). The tree is located on the NW corner of building .B' It is unclear whether this tree has been designated for removal or retention? This tree was NOT planted. Tree #12. Black pine (Pinus nigra) 21"DBH. The tree is located on the NW side of building .B' This tree is designated for removal. Tree #13. Black pine (Pinus nigra) 24"DBH. The tree is located on the NW side of building B. This tree is designated for removal. Tree #14. Black pine (Pinus nigra) 19"DBH. The tree is located on the NW side of buildingZ. This tree is designated for removal. ' A If you require any further technical information, please contact me at 503-704-8024. Sincerely, Kevin MacKenzie Overlook Tree Preservation, INC Certified Arborist #PN 0742AT CCB #176365 rtio‘ ;, 'k N k ‘.*.? , {: i" �' H . � . -N• Ilifita A , . ttl • "� k _el ° X �'- , ,„.^ c Ll f z � M 441 , y 4, P� �; ti I fi , • 1` I }11 * 1 i, ii... .. $ -i4t : f r/�+i' ' A # 1 l J.,1 r ,� y + j FYI f4 -9 ilk 1 41. . . ! for ..v, 68 II ' '•f - , * ''',' ' .12e. . e X ' :.-le .. . . - . .:Pt • • • , . 4 1141 1 . , , - • ‘41t i r . 4 ,, = 's# ' .: . ,-.... .. ir . .. • . ..,ill- if v r , . 4,4,, , • 11 • • ,,, „ I t If , I '' i'" 4 4 t b ,,....4 lit . ,• I .ir f ., i . ' .1 . ' • -...;.,P. .1. * V: 1 1 1 - .. . 1 - • ,- . . 1 ,• 1 .,t,, .04.1 • t , • i 1 . ... . It t '4,•A • .... .. ..,. , . . . . # ... ... . ,... . . _ .. .. f I. OA - :.`'.el - 4 1 . . . • ... . -,•• '- 'Illah i . .. . .. , ( . • ,. . ..: I) z- . ,.a ' . . i i r ._, c - „,. • I . -:, 1 , . r 1... xs...?... , I I .;,...• 4.-.."" - ,A. ' -•, .IA ),a, ,.. ..s. A. •ig r I.,' • r " I. .■ . V ;; t • • • • -,.. . .. r vt, -a • ... • • iv. V I14-11 ' Ail le., i 1 1 g;.*• ,A lb le gifP ..rVe.4141/1-' .4"e„..• _ .•...?'..,..A.. 1 'At • Restrictions in the Vegetate ,,urridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership,such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBIvffI IAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. • SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. ® TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree PIan Requirements Handout" included in your pre-application conference packet) A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING,REMOVAL AND PRO'T'ECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. PRO 1'ECTION IS PREFERRED OVER REMOVAL WHEREVER POSSIBLE (Address all items in the City's Tree Plan Requirements Handout). THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; 4.fc Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75%of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50%of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75%or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in rtliper requires no mitigation; ▪ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed;and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section re. 1 ; vnihary S1qk 'F Dis-hal/ice_ �J VLMKCONSULTING 103222M53 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 ww.vImk.com TDC - Parking Preliminary Intersection Sight Distance Certification May 11, 2011 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 718-2470 - FAX: (503) 969-4188 http://www.tidard-or.qov Attn: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E., Development Engineer RE: TDC - Parking — PRELIMINARY Sight Distance Certification The proposed shared access for this proposal is located on the site's west property line, onto SW Hunziker Road. The speed limit along SW Hunziker Road is 35 M.P.H., based upon the posted speed limit, requiring 350 feet of sight distance in both directions, in accord with Washington County Code Section 501-8.5.F(4). As required by Washington County Code Sections 501-8.5-F(3)(a) AND 501-8.5 F(3)(b), sight distance from the access to SW Hunziker Road was measured to be 350+ feet to the west of the access in one direction and 350+feet to the east of the access in the other direction. These Code Sections respectively require that measurements be based on an eye height of 3.5 feet and an object height of 4.25 feet above the road; and be assumed to be 10 feet from the near edge of pavement to the front of a stopped vehicle, (Actual measurement is taken 15 feet from pavement edge). In conclusion, I hereby certify that the intersection sight distance is available at the proposed access for TDC — Parking. Sight distance conforms to the requirements as set forth in the Washington County Community Development Code, subject to the following improvements: a. New onsite parking improvements for 8001 & 8005 SW Hunziker Road P80FFS I r � c� FF sio • ti �� �61270PE 9r. • Robert J. Leger, P.E. OREGON VLMK Consulting Engineers .po ,c/OREGON oo`� Q e Y15,7- FqT JAME`�\"� • ' EXPIRES: 12/31/20 1t- Structural Engineering•Civil Engineerina•Industrial Enoineering•Planning•Studies/Evaluations•Entitlement File:G:\Acad2010\21049S\Permits\O6 Sight Distance Cert dication\Preliminary Sight Distance Certification.dote Page 1 of 1 Printed: May 11,2011 . . VLMK C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S 3933 SW Kelly Avenue Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 B503.222.4453 vlmk @vlmk.com B 503.248.9263 www.vImk.com TDC - Parking 8001 - 8005 SW Hunziker Road w Tigard, OR Drawn by: RJL i Checked by: RJL FG = 150.7 11-41;_ f__ ill OBJ = 154.95 v ° r SHARED I r r r 4. ACCESS / I 8.....0 1 SW ■ 350' l / III ZI ER R��AD I . i 1 . ; 1 io:e. - N. ‘ketot� NE 7 ?AR KING AREA _!EDGE OF \ :•� �, `` TRAVELED WAY � e., A f '/T . ,_FG = 150.7 e ��,y��r \ � ' EYE = 154.2 4. ' �ROa, s�rrr� - q %a,\ / d •r II 350 ►•:e,• Lk,,, /:,...� $* FG = 153.8 OBJ = 158.05__t . W ,,,�� 'r INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE EXHIBIT 1' = 100' I S E S 100 0 100 200 300 210498 Sight Distance Exhibit.dwg St0 r rvi W r H eperl CONSULTING P 503.222.4453 E N G I N E E R S F 503.248.9263 E vlmk%wlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 bV www.vlmk.com PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CALCULATIONS for TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER 8001 SW Hunziker Road Tigard, Oregon for TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER 8001 SW Hunziker Road Tigard, Oregon oto PRope 4 61 + t•• At j �. � ^ +.Mt z' 04, 'rr5 ° 60 4r../At ESQ EXPIRES: 12/31120 I Z- VLMK Job Number: 210498 Issue Date: 17May11 Prepared By: Robert J. Leger, P.E. Contents: Preliminary Storm water Calculations for Design Review ,Structural Engineering•Civil Engineering•lndustrial Engineering•Planning:Studies/Evatuations•Entitternent Fite:u:'vAcad2010\210498\caks\Cnri\210498 PREUMtNARY Stounwater Report.docx Printed:May 13,2011 Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Storm water Calculations for TDC TABLE OF CONTENTS Page L Site and Project Information 1 1. Site Vicinity Map 2 2. Project Information .3 - 4 3. Stormwater Narrative 4 - 6 II. Stormwater Analysis for TOG A. Site Analysis 7 1. Existing Conditions Map 8 2. New Impervious Areas Map 9 3. Drainage Basin Map 10 4. SBUH Calculations for 2-yr, 24-hr event 11 - 13 5. SBUH Calculations for 10-yr, 24-hr event 14 - 15 6. SBUH Calculations for 25-yr, 24-hr event ` 16 - 17 7. Extg. Water Quality/Quantity Control Pond Model 18 8. ROUTE Calculations -- Existing Pond Model Routing 19 - 20 B. Stormwater Quantity Control 21 1. Storm.Tech. SC-740 Chamber Bed Model 22 2. ROUTE Calculations System Model Routing 23 25 3. Storm Event Hydrographs 26 - 28 4. Facility Plan Detail 29 C. Water Quality Treatment 30 1. Water Quality Calculations 31 2. Water Quality.Facility Plan & Details 32 D. Stormwater Conveyance 33 1. Site Utility Plan 34 APPENDIX A. Soil Survey & Hydrologic Classification A1-A2 B. TR-55 Curve Number Table 2-2a B1 C. Design Storm Events Cl ATTACHMENTS • Stormwater Management Facilities Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Agreement for Tigard Distribution Center (TO BE SUBMITTED WITH FINAL REPORT/PERMIT DOCUMENTS) t;fe: G:,,Acad2010\2I0448\Caics\Civil\210498 PRELIMINARY Stormwater Report.dacx Printed:May 06,2011 Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Storm water Calculations for TDC Site & Project Information for Tigard Distribution Center File:G:`Acad2010\2104981Caics\Ovif,210498 PRELIMINARY Stormwaler Report.docx Printed:May 06,2011 VCY4 TDC EXPANSION 210498 _ � .AsHAIES o V. LEY'41 �, _, I `\ ,Ni (�1 14 ',''..v..'..-^,-,-i , ii.,•••••••! . , ..z. „„ , ••,7 4... .., ..,. •_,.......... •,..„ ,..., • ICAR,-tvi ' i L- 1 ,,,k, ,...„,.,-;.,;i:r - - , '. , , '-2; • `C fit 7 C ,1.:::. PARK ,,,y, j? '"+..:. 6 --A nYr Cd ,PtT ,a I �' 'IY �'v[Y J n \ • 1• YGi+ j cLCaY RE.-=;• ... j t A f$,A-' ,F J PROJECT SITE 11911111 . SITE VICINITY MAP (Pilc-G --- 2- Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Storm water Calculations for TDC PROJECT INFORMATION The TDC expansion development will consist of site development improvements in the onsite undeveloped areas adjacent to each building at 8001 SW Hunziker Road. This project proposes to build two new parking areas for employees, and modify existing parking areas. One parking area will be created on the south side of the southern building (Building B), and one parking area will be created on the north side of the northern building (Building A). Both parking areas will have access through the site to SW Hunziker Street. This report is for the site stormwater system, including necessary modifications/additions necessary to meet current CWS code. The survey information is from a topographic survey of Tigard Distribution Center - part of a tract of land in Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Provided by Weddle Surveying. Inc. (6950 SW Hampton Street, Suite 170, Tigard, OR 97223, Phone: 503-595-8702). Additional site background information is from the original design documents and as-built drawings for the existing building. The overall site area (for stormwater calculations) is 6.952 acres (302,798 sf) The actual property area (after ROW dedication) is 6.385 acres (278,151 sf) The existing Impervious Area is 4.889 acres (212,966 sf) The site area to be disturbed is approximately 1.2 acres New Impervious Area (previously Pervious Area): 0.93 acres (40,688 sf) New Pervious Area (previously Impervious Area): 0.11 acres (4,858 sf) Impervious Areas to be Redeveloped (remove old AC & repave): 0.06 acres (2,480 sf) This property is zoned as light industrial. The existing ground covers include landscaping, roof, pavement and gravel in developed areas, and grassy vegetation in undeveloped areas. The water quality/water quantity control calculations in this report cover the appropriate site areas as defined by the CWS code. An existing stormwater quality/quantity control pond for a small portion of the site will be removed. The runoff generated from these areas will be collected and routed to new water quality/water quantity control facilities per the current code. Runoff will be discharged to the existing stormwater system in SW Hunziker Road, directly south of the site Water quality/water quantity control is achieved by routing all site runoff through underground facilities. All stormwater runoff enters the facilities prior to discharge to the existing stormwater system. The stormwater facility and conveyance systems for this development have been designed per Clean Water Services standard requirements. In order to retrofit the existing conveyance system with water quality and quantity control, the installation of a pump station is required. Additional design information used was obtained from: 'The USDA SCS "Soil Survey of Washington County" 'USDA SCS TR-55 "Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds" (2nd Ed., June 1986) F ; \Acad2010‘210498\CattskC,v4\210498 PRELIMINARY Stormwater Report docx Pnnted May 13,2011 (6V,1E- Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Storm water Calculations for TDC Software used in design: •King County `HYD' program, version 4.218 •Haestad Methods 'FlowMaster' program, version 5 •Microsoft EXCEL 2000 •AutoCAD 2006 STORMWATER NARRATIVE Stormwater Facilities for TDC The new on-site area and existing site area storm runoff will be diverted to new water quality/water quantity control facilities. The first facility that stormwater will enter is an underground StormTech detention chamber system and control manhole. During storm events, the facility detains runoff and releases it at lower flowrates. Water quality control is achieved by diverting the first portion of all site runoff (up to 0.5 cfs) through a StormFilter manhole unit. StormFilter cartridges will continuously treat up to 0.12 cfs. Runoff is diverted to the StormFilter manhole from the detention control manhole. Flow rates above 0.5 cfs will be diverted to the high flow bypass line from the control manhole. Runoff will.be.dischargedsto theexisting storrnwater,systern in SW Hunziker Road, directly south of the site. All storm events have been calculated and are included in this report. Site Analysis The existing site has a small water quality/water quantity control pond that treats runoff from 0.31 acres of the site. This is equal to•the new impervious areas added by the 1999 site improvements. In order to analyze the existing site as pre- and post- development, the existing site was analyzed as two sites, and the outflow hydrographs were combined to create one "pre-development" storm event for the 2, 10 and 25 year storm events. See the "SBUH Events - Pre & Post-Development" worksheets. The majority of the site area has no water quantity control, and is noted as "X-Yr. Pre- Developed (UnitetainedsSite Area)". This hydrograph was created first, and the output file was designated with'an "S" for Site The<small portion of the site with water quantity control is noted as "X-Yr. Pre-Developed (Detained Area to Pond)". This hydrograph was created next, and the output file was designated with a "P" for Pond. This hydrograph was then routed through a model of the existing'pond and orifice system as designed (the existing pond model, and ROUTE calculations, are included with the "ROUTE Calculations -- Existing Pond Model Routing" worksheets). The detained outflow hydrograph from this pond was created, and the output file was designated as a .RTE fife. These hydrographs were combined using HYD. The result yields the pre-development runoff rates that we will meet after development. Fite G:\ACad2G10\210498\Caics\CwMn,210498 PRELIMINARY Storrnwater PeD-Jr t Printed: May 13,2011 Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Stormwater Calculations for TDC The StormTech facility was designed to detain the fully developed site and release runoff no faster than the existing (pre-developed) rates. Hydrographs for the post- development site were routed through the StormTech model, verifying that post- development runoff rates are equal to or less than the pre-development site condition. Water Quality Treatment Storm runoff from all paved areas, and some landscaping areas, is routed to "trapped" catch basins for pre-treatment prior to discharge to the facilities. The StormFilter facility is designed to filter and remove suspended solids in stormwater runoff prior to discharge from the site The facilities have been designed to maximize removal of pollutants by routing all stormwater through the StormTech Isolator Rows prior to entering the StormFilter manhole. As most pollutants (Phosphorous, Nitrogen, metals, etc.) sorb to suspended solids in runoff, the greater the amount of suspended solids that are removed, the lower the pollutant concentrations will be in the effluent. Water quality treatment areas include: all new impervious,areas - 40,688 sf, and previous water quality treatment areas - 13,460 sf. New pervious areas created (4,858 sf) is greater than "redevelopment" areas (2,480 sf), bringing the redevelopment area to lessn 1,000 sf. No additional treatment of "undisturbed impervious areas"is proposed All flow up to about 0,5 cfs will be routed tO,the`=water quality manhole. Cartridges installed have capacity to treat up to 0.12 cfs continuously (0.113 cfs is required). Flows up to 1.5 cfs can be internally bypassed inAthe StormFilter manhole without stirring up trapped sediments. Flows above 0.5 cfs wilt be bypassed upstream of the water quality manhole (at the quantity control manhole). Storm Quantity Control (Detention) Runoff will be discharged to a StormTech® SC-740 arch chamber underground quantity control system beneath the new parking area. Quantity control will limit post- development runoff rates to the pre-development runoff rates, up to the 25-year event. Outflow from the chambers (embedded in rock) will be restricted in a manhole control structure with a weir & orifice with overflow. The arched chambers are open at the base, and storage volumes include void space in the surrounding gravel, above and below the chambers. The system will be lined on the bottom and sides by an impermeable liner to create a watertight storage system. Available volume has been determined in Section II B of this report. The liner will extend at least 6" above the 25-year event elevation. Runoff enters the system through a connection at a maintenance manhole. This first "Isolator Row" of chambers is wrapped in filter fabric in order to trap sediment. Testing shows that the Isolator Row TM screens & removes 80% of sand size sediment larger than 110 microns. The filter fabric on the bottom of the Isolator Rows allow for long term He*G:tidtcad2010''.,210448\Caics;Gvlt\210498 PRELIMINARY Storrn.vater Report.docx Prirsted•May 13,2011 p j Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Storm water Calculations for TDC maintenance with jet-vac equipment without displacing the embedment stone. Trapping large sediment upstream of the StormFilter manhole will prolong the life of the filters and help them provide better treatment. Because of the high-inflow/high-outflow of this system, and the limited exfiltration rate of water through the rows, two parallel Isolator Rows are used and connected via a second maintenance manhole. These two rows will trap the first flush of stormwater, trapping most of the large sediment from the site runoff. If a surge reaches the system and the Isolator Rows cannot transport the runoff fast enough through the rock bed to the other chambers, a high flow bypass pipe connects the second maintenance manhole to the third and fourth StormTech chamber rows. These last 2 rows connect directly to the control manhole. A perforated underdrain is placed in the bedding rock and connected to the control manhole to allow the system to fully drain after storm events. A ROUTE data file was created using the StormTech layout (stage/discharge/storage). The post-development storm events have been modeled through the StormTech system using the HYD ROUTE Routine. Calculations and data are included in this report. Overflow The 25-year storm event will rise to elevation 148.40 in the chamber-bed. The lowest catch basin elevation on site is 151.25. Overflow will occur at the control manhole by rising above the control weir structure. No ponding is expected to occur onsite. Conveyance The storm conveyance pipes have been designed to convey the 25-year event flowrate (3.90") as calculated using the Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph (SBUH). Haestad Methods "Flowmaster" software was used for pipe flow/conveyance calculations. A Manning's coefficient (n) of 0.010 was used to size conveyance pipes. Conveyance calculationswill be included with this report when it is submitted for building permit. All storm-water. facilities and conveyance systems for this development have been designed;per Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management, dated June 2007. An Operations & Maintenance Agreement for the stormwater management facilities will be attached to this report when submitted for building permit. E e:G:\Acad2olo\21G4,18,,Caics',C.v:01IO498 PRELIMINARY Stormwater Report.docx Panted: May 13.2011 VI e fir. Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Stormwater Calculations for TDC Stormwater Analysis for Tigard Distribution Center Site Analysis .‘ • • *t •f F G\Acad20I0■210498,Ca:cs%Cm1,210498 PRELIMINARY Stormwater Report.docx Printed: May 06,2011 ?w 7— >r' TDC EXPANSION 207540 p s 4.26s16 • 170.O' `// R s 13.1„� "y{ s/'/i C8 316r ' ate.r,0 cAP r��/ BUILDING C 5 o°`` 00 0 t`r,r 5 „"ro 1, si !/ EXISTING BUILDING '/ f rj . /////7///////7::;k;/i '//// /7//73/1/ /7//_//1//' >1'.;0' 7,///e//I/ " ... .,,,,././//////./y/ / , ,/7/7,p o s T o • O 0 000 .„//////// .///7, 7///,/,...//,/,:///,',/ 2/ /J.__ ___x.,.:,, RR swtrCw �, _ 1l ;ii _ _ • - 11 .1' 'w zv.;,•... -AIL r r r r r r r �, .. 1/U_ -__ II :er j Yin 7F�r r" n� flia��1 iE��t .--- ti 17— ----- RR 53-4:A. ,o.,/ ,%. • rya 1I „-._.__... _ — �...... .. ..., _ \ �', lif• i I , `�.f—» 1N« ` 1 -_ , 0 lit i •• .0 '',' .1 B . • , •j Y TREATED/UNDETAINED _._ ..._... �+o saFr ` "N 1 XISTING WQ/DETENTION DRAINAGE AREA TO SITES' 7 M ca` l, POND FOR 13,460 SF P STORMWATER SYSTEM I Fy + t I k• If ms__�, ;:"r Q2430 SOFT. (INCLUDING ACCESS. ROAD): I �` 1 . . /.It - I F.. . t,:... ,.. (0.31 ACRES) I i tit .. ,. . .. .,....,1,,,� •, 1:.. . IMPERVIOUS AREA 2.064 ACRES PERVIOUS y.;. / .�� 11 1 F,I ,a , 4.578 ACRES IMPERVIOUS _ ! w err '; e t*y 1 F ! y. / ��� - -- _ itt, Fac-gti\ • ;... K tsa. w 1/047.44 i 3 3 I f f.� i i /\ r v�r i. X 4i 1 •1 , 1 i 1 i , 111 1 1 i 1 ,94.41- l`''''-'"4 I }' _ 7 _ �..._...... . _ _ ( +;' ., ,1 / I/1/ U y 1 I F f I 1 3 S f t F , t optv`T N" ry V Sn —Y' ,...--,f,3-4-.. owe T 7 I `• i 1 t t —... ._.__. N 1 F' , _ -.. s A •ti v Ol r�` J• :, .�.. O 2... . _ - �� ,.. � _-, ...:ate°. .. N- x !F- �' .""w`{r r S 08.22'221N 9Q4.43' tsf.75 r �y / • ....,_____ r' �J ._ w � nu 151.9 _ ST ST — ST--\--,- S we ss► EDGE ST ST s Rtu _ — .._ s oe•z�' 11os.3#a. �x ' .��._ ; vi /�j+ •. SS gyp:. '� �i �I ��� � -.� ��� CC,.. �-' : • � .. .. ' " a1�''� . ._.. SS''''' ,... 1rO �1 � ., /�Q�,... � 3J .1 Rat+ 5�QOM a00--' ��� ..:r sic>li _ .. '':- ,44, • „a7D .22 , 53 s5 - - ITT. s aT Rini 5� 777 c`k° f+ sc _. ... 901,-:.,„,� �s9 ei4(s) t.4 x N } t5o•Sy �y ° • • p 1E tat.t3 4 !C., ,y „,,.,50.57 (5£) Z tµ.25 5 �' E t4t06 _—� �9 K•t o t�.t E tC'%?t�a'SO(E ��` .b�. *vC fN) r IMf W I _ ` 0 i 5D""`i5t.3t pAt iS3.00 110R1M:SOPt,t, RN ., > 7,`a. CURB f f/ ,.. .. .. V � R VET y41 t'rvC f5) j / /./ ' 1 J ,� •2... 61 C f f S EXISTING BUILDING _.__ ...k I' r'llf—il"17 II- Iffiallibik EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP 1" = 60' •MEIN prldird 60 0 60 120 180 PAGE 8 TDC EXPANSION 207540 R , 16 �>;�A5EIAEH'T 00 LINE roil 0 EXISTING BUILDING REc. 9r6P 00 0 0 / A■4, x-- ,ANA 0 0 0 0 0 0 - . aNAVEL _{ fl 11 11 11 U II H H 1t�H i) ll�li H ti .. ... . •''•... " r• 1.`Y:._ .. / ` .. . ..,t/ it.e ,� - EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: I 212,966 SF "'/ , . t.;:::::::::::::.:A:-- r ,..,clim 1 p4WER 41N / , , To EAST E r t - is pE c�"ylo"'9` E T 1. % . .,.4'..=1,'N:-,'.1*---- / - ::.": ., i:i,„,-.. B. .00., .--,1974 �nsn -EDEVELOPED a,,oll►c .::'::::::'..1-.'::::':.:".. :. ' *.'''::::-/ if .....1:...;::%:::!..;::;;i:.,„;; 71,5 ,:,....:;:.;-.:-E..:::::.,:10;:,:.',L, x -` IMPERVIOUS AREAS: r / a•_ ° # 2,480 SF (0.06 cj ', j /of ELEVAFOfrllsrr>o rtooa: ls ) t4 ; , .i,.:z ,1 40,688 SF 3 RS) L � II ', ,. . , w . TOTAL TOTAL / as 1 . . ' h..l ..:..:.. ':wa'•.'.. k.•JM.. . .... .�w.tr .. ... a....,..rn .. . .. .....w..•,w.�.. n . r 4•"•..• '"j .. ..s.+L.°... Ii W'.l � S." -, Y�. e:..4......'• ,,,,t t +S.rC,J. i„ �I ' t 1 1 S i r �� A•; 'p♦♦♦♦ l 1' / f• II _ 1 EVY PE VIOUS AREAAS. /■Q — f :�•. .r � . -' .,• `O °•x" (FORMERLY IMPERVIOUS) ; .♦e 1 . / v� ;;: v , ♦ ,* ♦ a♦• 4110 MO 4,858 SF (0.11 ACRES) / . • , a TOTAL ,, , II o C o ..""."- -UTILITY SAVYCUT$ IN f EASING PAVEMENT: - ,, .. ? o lyf�j soAENI XIS1 NG WQ/DETENTION :" 1,537 SF (0.035 ACRES) • .d POND TO BE REMOVED. °' -�r TOTAL /� WATER QUALITY/ DETENTION AREA TO BE REPLACED: ,//:1;_l_ • 13,460 SF (0.31 ACRES) ` 3–1 1 I EXISTING BUILDING x ./ ♦♦♦♦.♦♦ NEW PERVIOUS AREA ,=------1 NEW IMPERVIOUS AREAS MAP 1• .• 60' .❖.�.*.•••. FORMERLY IMPERVIOUS) _. ,, •'• ;= REDEVELOPMENT AREA 60 0 60 120 180 NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA PAGE 9 (FORMERLY PERVIOUS) i . \ . - ,;ieft• ., ,, / ,,, \, , ., 1,38 . , 0 4 1p f _ ,,,, 1 1 -- , -1 :......! ..., . ,., ,) ..t .. \ \ \ _Jo ()I 0 x 1:1 1 Ilk ( • __, , . .... . ..,,, , ,••, .. ........ _. , . , , it , zift, i .' . , f -•$ -.. ....21 ' \ '. rt..',''' I 11 t,, :,.: , , „ . ....- • 44i. . . 4 viz , • 1..., i 1 tc . : i;7 \ i6.4 --+-- I' ' .rsx, . 1 -721---, '''' - - .t3 0-z --tr- 4 . , v., - • ... IP, 'CO I 1 ! 1 1\ , ' ' ,>`‘ .... t " I 1 i 1 i 1 ' :ON, \ ' . w . , , c,..0. .... -, - \ , t . • • . ' : ' -11 _ i * - wo _ _: . ..... .. . s :, -::...-, .: . .:=1.---4.....„-t ... ...... t 04 ,4 . , . . , .Ili . . , ..... 41, • ...,....,. g . . . A AREA = 8085.00 SOFT . , 0.19 ACRES 11, \ 4 . tr 1 o i• "I I . , lip*14e 1 ....„ „..., .,,..1 0 *s}str.11111 s \ DS 2 AREA = 7980.00 SOFT 0.18 ACRES i I : I 1 1 d 1 DS i OA) AREA t= 7995.00 SOFT I I 610 C54=0`f 0.18 ACRES . m 1 V / 1 i 1 0 1 I 0 I s.■° ° 1114144, 0.0.ot DS 4 AREA = 7965.00 SOFT U rnxi 8 Po! F., .,,. 0.18 ACRES 0•tit r 4 151 i p.131 ' 0,,„1 - ', 1..3(!i_ 11{11111 s-..\ ;i t il r ''.1k 0. I 1 ' ' 1 i ffir A 0 /> AREA = 7965.00 SOFT 0.18 ACRES O le 11 y iti.„ . . • 3 ....4 ! I 1.11 ......„ s ... ............... 7.. ...r. .4 a, to i I I DS 6 AREA = 5482.50 atlIPT ? 0 ia 0 0 -4 0.13 ACRES I m it' ,,, I 111 AREA = 6929.74 SOFT tittitr:-....- 1 ),. 1 -:,.: > ,, Si DS 7 u z i ; paii, : i .,..., ,.. , 0.16 ACRES > t,I 0as P* •! " , -II IEE 11 " Cji 0 0 0 I >• • >:4 a43:1 la . 0 ' IP 0(f) M . -401 DS ID (0. o to -I 0, 1 AREA = 8010.26 SOFT N ) 'Re° ' Ill 0.18 ACRES i c)to 1 co ,, , y,) ._, A 1 4 ' . _ AEr„ I 0 00 i ! Air _i__ .,. .......rir ... DS 11 4 = xi o (f) .• I ,. ,...„..... 1 -4(?) AREA = 3915.00 SOFT 0_09 ACRES I \\,, ms rT,1 6 . z . , ■ c94, 4. -4 'cn lb - c 0 1 N i 11 / X-a rn I: -N...., "T;m z all DS 12 r- AREA = 8910.00 sari 0 = rn xi , -• ask > k i 0.20 ACRES i D ' • : I R; i 1 vil 1 I DS 13 i 0 0 ..., t AREA = 6862.50 SOFT 1 • 1 0.16 ACRES t: tit t vfA j k Nr,... I, )' i 1 r : i r.,, , ..„ . , , , . ,p ... \ . , _. ..... ___, I , _ 2 ._ F).„..-•,..I ---"f ----I - ',.,-,-..4,---' I _2/ ...• z 0 z . 0 1 , z 1 v.,4,a5, . 0 CC° it al -4 DS 14 , I '\\ C i 00 r . AREA = 8040.12 S \\ CTI G iiiiwk. ..... . 4 ' 0.18 ACRES S 4 I = CI Z . , 1 I : -..-ais-o•-••••1-10.111.4.•-••- •-•••-•••-..4..-osi • am '. DS 15 1 ii I 1 0 "\, 1 $ $ \ xi > i to" v,.. 1-1 ' . _ } *REA = 8025.00 SOFT f 0.18 ACRES I ' t t I = motit t utE3 t ^11M-.4!..71•114,11111-11111,OW aus-.4*-4.*4/1/0-111111-4111/4/1M/WW/P4M i tn A 2 i Dt 16: lei c° 1 mit AREA tt, 4 90.90 SOFt I 1 I'" -7 0.11 ACRES g‘ ci . .S, id' I s wir - - -6! 1-- i i:!.. . i . - AREA = 3794.10 SOFT t. U.09 ..ACRE,S._-.I.--- em,milm ow on om wi t I i SEE i I--/ .. I Naita Illib Ma MO la IM 1•11 M111111111110 MO 1104110-611-116-1111i , i , ' A , ..... .*4- L_ • DS t8 t , .... R. .... 741... so AREA = 10092.87 SOFT 1 ... Ili O '3 ACRES • 1,11 I I ' ' (1) 5ze -4 es,II n ..... X i ,. .OD I ----- DS 19 . t ; AREA = 5507.02 SOFT ' 4.13 i ...o..... ..... ... r...._ FR nii-4 Ins I e I 0.13 ACRES 1111 , , z. ik 411te ' '111111-lit *iiizt.alik, .1' .414:.`40,t, • 1•.. "II P.31.4.• 1 h 14111 .■j' ., 4---; V.. •••• .._2 i,...../.... , ...,...„ r ..";;;,............ ,.,.., , ■ ■ '.:r. ' t'S.4.. . 1',1. i / •..)03 \ ' i > -411441`,..„:4•I'••• Y . ' ' 0 4.•.7: '0 •- • " ,. 102 - --..•0.144.... .., 4 -40 .._ -4•10..„,. r k . .. \ A ___ er . -, 44'. .4"•••■••••4' if' 1 V L ENGINEERS 503.222.4453 503.248.9263 vlmkevlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 www.vimk.com TDC Expansion SBUH Events - Pre & Post-Development KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.218 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 - ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7 - BASEFLOW 8 - PLOTHYD 9 - DATA 10 - RDFAC 11 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: 2 SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREO(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 2,24,2.50 2-YR. PRE-DEVELOPED (UNDETAINED SITE AREA) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.50" TOTAL PRECIP. ******** ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC 2.064,80,4.578,98,5.0 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 6.6 2. 1 80.0 4.6 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 3.32 7.67 44395 ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING12104981PRE-2S.MYD ,Structural Engineering•Civil Engineerir,g•lndustr:al Engineering•Pianning•StudsesiEvaluations•Entittement FAl G'A cad20101 2104481Ca ks\CivrFt2:W98 SIAM£vonts.dou Pat,I of r 71 rnud Apra 13,2013 4 r A TDC Expansion SBUH Events - Pre & Post-Development 2-YR. PRE-DEVELOPED (DETAINED AREA TO POND) ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , IC 0.000,80,0.310,98,5.0 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .0 80.0 .3 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .20 7.67 2555 ENTER (d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C:\ODRAWING\210498\PRE-2P.HYD 2-YR. PRE-DEVELOPED (DETAINED AREA TO POND) ROUTE THROUGH POND ENTER [d: ] (path]filename[ .ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: 10DRAWING\210498\PRE-2P.HYD INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: ALSO SEE "ROUTE PEAK-INFLOW(CFS-) PEAK-OUTFLOW(CFS OUTFLOW-VOL(CU-FT) CALCULATIONS .2 0 .06 2552 EXISTING POND INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) MODEL ROUTING" 149.90 8.33 152.01 FOR DETAILS ON PEAK STORAGE: 440 CU-FT THIS MODEL ENTER [d: 1[path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING\210498\PRE-2P.RTE rila:G',Ac ad2010\210446'•,Caks4Cm11210498 SBUH fveo dodo /j Pa`e 2 of 7 1 Printed ARni 13,21311 Y AG e., TDC Expansion SBUN Events - Pre & Post-Development 2-YR. PRE-DEVELOPED (COMBINED ROUTE AND UNDETAINED HYDROGRAPHS) ROUTINE FOR ADDING HYDROGRAPHS ENTER: [d: ]jpath)filenamej .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1 C:\ODRAWING\2104981PRE-2S.HYD ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 1 5.0 ENTER: [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2 C: \ODRAWING\210498\PRE-2P.RTE ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 2 5.0 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH 1 : PEAK-0= 3.21 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 5 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 2: PEAK-Q= .06 CFS T-PEAK= 8.50 HRS TT= 5 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 3.26 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS f- DETENTION TARGET TOTAL VOLUME: 46932 CU-FT ENTER jd': j[path]fileneme[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: gaglaitIanalgialaRkW 2-YR. POST-DEVELOPED ENTIRE SITE ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC 0.990,80,5.906,98,5.0 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 6.9 1 .0 80.0 5.9 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 3.97 7.67 51876 ENTER [d: ) [path]filenamej .ext) FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C \OORAW NG\21O4y,POSST-.2-HYQ F3e G\Atad2D13',21C4 8\Ca(ts\Cv4\210498 SBUN Eveets.doc. i Pap Sot Printed Awii 13,2811 �� TDC Expansion SBUH Events - Pre & Post-Development 10-YR. PRE-DEVELOPED (UNDETAINED SITE AREA) S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 10,24,3.45 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV), TC 2.064,80,4.578,98,5.0 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 6.6 2.1 80.0 4.6 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 4.92 7.67 65418 ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING\210498\PRE-10S.HYD 10-YR. PRE-DEVELOPED (DETAINED AREA TO POND) ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC 0.000,80,0.310,98,5.0 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .0 80.0 .3 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .28 7.67 3619 ENTER [d: J (path)filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C:\ODRAWING\210498\PRE-10P.HYD 10-YR. PRE-DEVELOPED (DETAINED AREA TO POND) ROUTE THROUGH POND ENTER [d: J [path]filename[ .ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING\210498\PRE-10P.HYD INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW(CFS) OUTFLOW-VOL(CU-FT) ALSO SEE "ROUTE .28 .20 3774 CALCULATIONS — EXISTING POND INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) MODEL ROUTING" 149.90 7.83 152.15 FOR DETAILS ON PEAK STORAGE: 530 CU-FT THIS MODEL ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING\210498\PRE-10P.RTE File G.\\Acad2010121014rICAACNA21049115SUH Events dcc. (�-^/� Page 4 of 7 Printed ap.d 13,2.711 Rell C TDC Expansion SBUH Events - Pre & Post-Development 10-YR. PRE-DEVELOPED (COMBINED ROUTE AND UNDETAINED HYDROGRAPHS) ROUTINE FOR ADDING HYDROGRAPHS ENTER: [d: ) [path)filename[ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1 C: \ODRAWING\2104981PRE-1OS.HYD ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 1 5.0 ENTER: [d: ] (path)filename[ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2 C:\ODRAWING\210498\PRE-10P.RTE ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 2 5.0 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH 1 : PEAK-0= 4.76 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 5 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 2: PEAK-Q= .20 CFS T-PEAK= 8.00 HRS TT= 5 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 4.92 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS E- DETENTION TARGET TOTAL VOLUME: 69149 CU-FT ENTER [d:]jpathjfilename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: : \S'�ODRAWING 210498\PRE-10C HYQ 10-YR. POST-DEVELOPED ENTIRE SITE ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV), TC 0.990,80,5.906,98,5.0 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 6.9 1 .0 80.0 5.9 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 5.70 7.67 74698 ENTER [d: ) (pathjfilename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: i_� OODRA[yING1 104981POST-14 HYQ Foe:G.1A cad201J12i044S\4ks\Civif\210d48 313014 Events.dxx �} Ps=e 5 of 7 Printed Aptd 13,2011 1S'/ .�cj (_7 TDC Expansion SBUH Events - Pre & Post-Development 25-YR. PRE-DEVELOPED (UNDETAINED SITE AREA) S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 25,24,3.90 ******************** S.G.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC 2.064,80,4.578,98,5.0 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 6.6 2.1 80.0 4.6 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 5.70 7.67 75591 ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C:\ODRAWING\210498\PRE-25S.HYD 25-YR. PRE-DEVELOPED (DETAINED AREA TO POND) ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV) , TC 0.000,80,0.310,98,5.0 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .0 80.0 .3 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .32 7.67 4124 ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING\210498\PRE-25P.HYD 25-YR. PRE-DEVELOPED (DETAINED AREA TO POND) ROUTE THROUGH POND ENTER [d: ] [path]fiiename[ .ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C:\ODRAWING\210498\PRE-25P.HYD INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: ALSO SEE "ROUTE PEAK-INFLOW(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW(CFS) OUTFLOW-VOL(CU-FT) CALCULATIONS — .32 .21 4166 EXISTING POND INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) MODEL TAUTINON 149.90 8.00 152.26 FOR DETAILS ON THIS MODEL PEAK STORAGE: 600 CU-FT ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING\210498\PRE-25P.RTE Fi;. 6 t,Acad2010 12104481,Caicsif-vrk216II9$S.SUr iVlRts Pate 6 of 7 ✓ Prv.tad:Ap•rl 13,NU A4... — t f i to TDC Expansion SBUH Events - Pre & Post-Development 25-YR. PRE-DEVELOPED (COMBINED ROUTE AND UNDETAINED HYDROGRAPHS) ROUTINE FOR ADDING HYDROGRAPHS ENTER: (d:j[pathjfilename[ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1 C:\ODRAWING\210498\PRE-25S.HYD ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 1 5.0 ENTER: [d: j [pathjfilename[ .extj OF HYDROGRAPH 2 C: \ODRAWING\210498\PRE-25P.RTE ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 2 5.0 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH 1 : PEAK-Q= 5.51 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 5 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 2: PEAK-Q= .20 CFS T-PEAK= 8.00 HRS TT= 5 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-O= 5.71 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS - DETENTION TARGET TOTAL VOLUME: 79752 CU-FT ENTER [d:j [pathjfilename[ .extj FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \OD W 1 4981 - t HYD 25-YR. POST-DEVELOPED ENTIRE SITE ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC 0.990,80,5.906,98,5.0 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 6.9 1 .0 80.0 5.9 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 6.52 7.67 85621 ENTER [d: ) [pathjfilename[ .extj FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: S ODRAWINGl21A498\POST-z5.HYD Fde G',Ac.ad2010\219498',Gks1Cnr1 10E98 56:iii Eveno.J0ca Printed APrd 13,2011 17449;g:: I�_ C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S 3933 SW Kelly Avenue - Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 503.222.4453 Job Name: TDC EXPANSION 503.248.9263 vimk©vfmk.com Job No.: 210498 www.vlmk.com Date: 12-Apr-11 yLQ1 - Sot are_C00'rr9RLZQQ9 VIMK Co"!5utting En n--r •d •ih` Extg. Water Quality/Water Quantity Control Pond Stage/Storage/Volume Summary Basin 1 (1st Cell) Stage Elevation Area Incr. Volume Storage (ft) (ft) (sf) (cf) (Ac-ft) (cf) 0.00 149.90 0 0 0.00 0 0.50 _ 150.40 58 0 0.00 0 BOTTOM OF POND 1.10 151.00 196 76 0.00 76 LIVE STORAGE 2.10 152.00 535 366 0.01 442 LIVE STORAGE 2.60 _ 152.50 737 318 0.01 760 PEAK 3.30 153.20 1018 614 0.01 1,374 STAGE-ELEVATION FOR ROUTE CALCULATIONS: • Elevation Stage 0.00 C.L. BOTTOM ORIFICE = 149.90 Stage 3.10 TOP OF LIVE STORAGE= 153.00 1 210498 Extg Pond Volume.x!sx PAGE V L M K CONSULTING 1 503.222.4453 E N G I N E E R S 503'248'9263 vlmkevimk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 www.vlmk.com TDC Expansion ROUTE Calculations - Existing Pond Model Routing KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.21E 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 - ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7 - BASEFLOW 8 - PLOTHYD 9 - DATA 10 - RDFAC 11 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: 4 RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] OF ROUTING DATA C:\ODRAWING12104981POND1 .txt <-- EXTG POND SYSTEM CAPACITY ROUTING DATA (SEE "DETENTION STORAGE AND ORIFICE CALCULATIONS") : STAGE(FT) DISCHARGE(CFS) STORAGE(CU-FT) PERM-AREA(SQ-FT) ELEVATION .00 .00 .0 .0 149.90 .50 .02 .0 .0 150.40 1 . 10 .03 76.0 .0 151 .00 2.10 .05 442.0 .0 152.00 2.20 .20 505.0 .0 152.10 2.30 .20 569.0 .0 152.20 2.40 .21 632.0 .0 152.30 2.50 .21 696.0 .0 152.40 2.60 .22 760.0 .0 152.50 2.70 .27 908.0 .0 152.60 3.30 .94 1374.0 .0 153.20 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH Structural Engineering•Civil Engineering•industrial Engi neering•Planning.StudiestEva uations•Entitlement F;e G`iAcad2010\210498\Caics Orif%213198 Falte Calcuat.cns Extg Pan0.dc o Pei.1 of 2 Panted.April 13,2011 1" (1)c TDC Expansion ROUTE Calculations - Existing Pond Model Routing 2-YEAR PRE-DEVELOPMENT STORM EVENT (DETAINED AREA TO POND) ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING\210498\PRE-2P.HYD <-- 2-YEAR STORM EVENT INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW(CFS) OUTFLOW-VOL(CU-FT) .20 .06 2552 INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 149.90 8.33 152.01 PEAK STORAGE: 440 CU-FT ENTER [d: j [pathjfilename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING12104981PRE-2P.RTE 10-YEAR POST-DEVELOPMENT STORM EVENT (DETAINED AREA TO POND) ENTER [d: j [path]filename[ .ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING12104981PRE-10P.HYD <-- 10-YEAR STORM EVENT INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW(CFS) OUTFLOW-V0L(CU-FT) .28 .20 3774 INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 149.90 7.83 152.15 PEAK STORAGE: 530 CU-FT ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING12104981PRE-10P.RTE 25-YEAR POST-DEVELOPMENT STORM EVENT (DETAINED AREA TO POND) ENTER [d: j [path]filename[ .ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING\2104981PRE-25P.HYD <-- 25-YEAR STORM EVENT INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW(CFS) OUTFLOW-VOL(CU-FT) .32 .21 4166 INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 149.90 8.00 152.26 PEAK STORAGE: 600 CU-FT ENTER [d: j [pathjfilename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING12104981PRE-25P.RTE File:v Nokad2010\21049/Maics\G.,\21049fl Saute Calculations Extg?cnd doc Pape 2 of 2 Printed.April 13,2011 174f—,C /, Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Stormwater Calculations for TDC Stormwater Analysis for Tigard Distribution Center Stormwater Quantity Control File:G:\Acad2010\210498\Caltx\Ovil\210498 PRELIMINARY Stormwater Report.docx � � n Printed: May 06,2011 rt1l.- �/� CONSULTING 503.2224453 JobTDC Expansion V ir 4 1 .K. E N G I N E E R S 503.248..92653 Job No.210498 3933 SW Kely Avenue - Portend • Oregon 97239-4393 vimk @vtmk.com Datel4Aprii www.vlmk.com vi 02.-sortwa,eCcovroatt 2649 VLMK Can+;:rngj-nc!nee.i, A,!R hts Reserve:, Storm Tech Detention Storage Model Diameter Centerline Chamber Data Based on Table 6 of the Storm Tech Design Manual (inches) Stage(ft) Area(sf) Orifice t . f r ; =` 0.35 Number of Chambers .z �' Orifice 2 �.:a vr�r 0.35 Length per Chamber 7.12 ft Weir Overflow r ;4&° * . 4,. ,: Width per Chamber 4.75 ft Volume of System 3.704 at overflow Footprint of Chambers 1,623 sf Bottom of Chambers ''' }....k To of Chambers 147.75 Stormlech SC-740 Chamber Bed Model Orifice 1 Orifice 2 Total Total Percolation Orifice Storage Storage Per Elevation Stage Discharge Discharge Discharge Storage Area Head Depth Chamber Notes (feet) (feet) (cfs) (cts) (cis) (of) (sf) (feet) (inches) (of) 144.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 144.33 0.08 0.49 0.00 0.49 1 0 0.08 0 0.00 144.42 0.17 0.69 0.00 0.69 2 0 0.17 0 0.00 Control MN 144.50 0.25 0.84 0.00 0.84 3 0 0.25 0 0.00 144,58 0.33 0.97 0.00 0.97 4 0 0.33 0 0.00 144.67 0.42 1.08 0.00 1.08 5 0 0.42 0 0.00 144.75 710.50,..:, 1.19 0.00 1.19 6 0 0.50 0 0.00 144.83 0.58 1.28 0.00 1.28 54 0 0.58 1 1.13 144.92 0.67 1.37 0.00 1.37 108 0 0.67 2 2.25 Stone 145.00 0.75 1.48 0.00 1.46 162- 0 0.75 3 3.38 Foundation 145.08 0.83 1.53 0.00 1.53 218 0 0.83 4 4.51 145.17 0.92 1.61 0.00 1.61 270 0 092 5 5.63 145.25 1.00 1.68 0.00 1.68 324 0 1.00 6 6.76 145.33 1.08 1.75 0.00 1.75 442 0 1.08 7 9.21 - 145.42. 1.17 1.82 000 1.82 560 0 1.17 it 11.66 ' 145:50. •1.25 1.88 0.00 1.88 676. 0 1.25 9 14.09 145.58 1.33 1.94 0.00 1.94 792 0 1.33 10 16.51 145.67 1.42 2.00 0.00 2.00 908 0 1.42 11 18.92 145.75 1.50 2.06 0.00 2.06 1,023 0 1.50 12 21.31 145.83 1.58 2.11 0.00 2.11 1,137 0 1.58 13 23.68 145.92 1.87 2.17 0.00 2.17 1,249 0 1.67 14 26.03 146.00 1.75 2.22 0.00 2.22 1,361 0 1.75 15 28.38 146.08 1.83 2.28 0.00 2.28 1,473 0 1.83 16 30.68 146,17. ,..1.92 2.33- 0.00 2.33 1,582 0 1.92 17 32.96 146.25 2.00 2.38 0.00 2.38 1.691 0 2.00 18 35.23 146.33 2.08 2.43 0.00 2.43 1,799 0 2.08 19 37.47 146.42 2.17 2.47 0.00 2.47 1,904 0 2.17 20 39.67 Chamber& 146.50 2.25 2.52 0.00 2.52 2,009 0 2.25 21 41.85 Stone 146.58 2.33 2.57 0.00 2.57 2,112 0 2.33 22 44.00 148.67 2.42 2.61 0.00 2.61 2,213 0 2.42 23 46.11 146.75 2.50 2.66 0.05 2.71 2,313 0 2.50 24 48.19 146.83 2.58 2.70 0.49 3.19 2,411 0 2.58 25 50.23 146.92 2.67 2.74 0.69 3.43 2,507 0 2.67 26 52.23 147.00 2.75 2.79 0.84 3.63 2,600 0 2.75 27 54.17 147.08 2.83 2.83 0.97 3.80 2,690 0 2.83 28 56.05 147.17 2.92 2.87 1.09 3.96 2.779 0 2.92 29 57.89 147.25 3.00 2.91 1.19 4.10 2,864 0 3.00 30 59.66 147.33 3.08 2.95 1.28 4.24 2.945 0 3.08 31 61.36 147.42 3.17 2.99 1.37 4.36 3,023 0 3.17 32 62.97 147.50 3.25 3.03 1.46 4.49 3.094 0 3.25 33 64.46 147.58 3.33 3.07 1.54 4.60 3,156 0 3.33 34 65.75 147.67 3.42 3.11 1.61 4.72 3.215 0 3.42 35 66.98 147.75 3.50 3.14 1.68 4.83 3,271 :: 0 3.50 36 68.14 147.83 3.58 3.18 1.75 4.93 .34324:;:-. 0 158 37 69.26 147.92 3.67 3.22 1.82 5.03 3. . , ;.,;. 0 ..3.6Z 38 70,3.9 148.00 3.75 3.25 1.88 5.13 3;431 c ' 0 3.75 39 71.52 148.08 3.83 3.29 1.94 5.23 3.AiS7:' 0 3.83 40 72.64 Stone Cover 148.17 3.92 3.33 2.00 5.33 3, t'`' 0 3.92 41 73.77 148.25 4.00 3.36 2.06 5.42 1595 0 4.00 42 74.90 148.33 4.08 3.40 2.12 5.51 3,6+39' 0 4.08 43 76.03 148.42 4.17 3.43 2.17 5.60 34' 0 4.17 44 77.16 148.50 425 3.46 2.22 6.02 '. ,3j'.M 0 425 45 78.29 Weir 148.58 4.33 3.50 2.28 6.68 3,812, 0 4.33 46 79.42 Overflow r 148.67 4,42 3.53 2.33 7.51 URA 0 442 47 80.55 148.75 4.50 3.57 2.38 8.47 ,1(921-- 0 4.50 48 81.68 210498 ROUTE StormTech SC•740.xlsx PAGE 7 E N GVLMK CONULING 5 INETERS 503.222.4453 503.248.9263 vlmkevlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 www.vimk.com TDC Expansion ROUTE Calculations - System Model Routing Verification KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.218 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 - ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7 - BASEFLOW 8 - PLOTHYD 9 - DATA 10 - RDFAC 11 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: 4, RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY (d: ](path]filename( .ext) OF ROUTING DATA C: \ODRAWING\210498\ST-48.txt <-- SYSTEM CAPACITY W/ 48 CHAMBERS ROUTTN0 DATA (SEE "DETENTION STORAGE .AND ORIFICE CALCULATIONS") : STAGE(FT) DISCHARGE(CFS) STORAGE(CU-FT) PERM-AREA(SQ-FT) ELEVATION .00 .00 .0 .0 144.25 BOTTOM ORIFICE .08 .49 1.0 .0 . 17 .69 2.0 .0 .25 .84 3.0 .0 .33 .97 4.0 .0 .42 1 .08 5.0 ,0 .50 1 .19 6.0 .0 .58 1 .28 54.2 .0 .67 1 .37 108.0 .0 .75 1 .46 162.2 .0 .83 1 .53 216.5 .0 .92 1 .61 270.2 .0 1 .00 1 .68 324.5 .0 1 .08 1 .75 442. 1 .0 1 .25 1 .88 676.3 .0 1 .33 1 .94 792.5 .0 1 .42 2.00 908.2 .0 1 .50 2.06 1022.9 .0 1 .58 2.11 1136.6 .0 1 .67 2. 17 1249.4 .0 1 .75 2.22 1361 .3 .0 1 Structural Engineering•Civil Engineering•Endustrial Engirteering•Ptann ng•StudieslEvaivations•Entitlement Fife G Acad2410 2104484Caksi,CmA210 499 Route Caitv'-aticns F+naL•oc. PaR•1 of 3 } Printed Ap,4 14,2011 �j.fit f / TDC Expansion ROUTE Calculations - System Model Routing Verification 1 .92 2.33 1582. 1 .0 2.00 2.38 1691 .0 .0 2.08 2.43 1798.6 .0 2.25 2.52 2008.8 .0 2.33 2.57 2112.0 .0 2.42 2.61 2213.3 .0 2.50 2.66 2313.1 .0 2.58 3. 19 2411 .0 .0 2.67 3.43 2507.0 .0 2.75 3.63 2600.2 .0 2.92 3.96 2778.7 .0 3.00 4. 10 2863.7 .0 3.08 4.23 2945.3 .0 3.25 4.49 3094.1 .0 3.33 4.60 3156.0 .0 3.42 4.72 3215.0 .0 3.50 4.83 3270.7 .0 3.58 4.93 3324.5 .0 3.67 5.03 3378.7 .0 3.75 5. 13 3433.0 .0 3.92 5.33 3541 .0 .0 4.00 5.42 3595.2 .0 4.08 5.51 3649.4 .0 4. 17 5.60 3703.7 .0 4.25 5.69 3757.9 .0 4.33 6.09 3812.2 .0 4.42 6.75 3866.4 .0 75.12 TOP ORIFICE 4.50 7.58 3920.6 .0 76.03 OVERFLOW AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH 2-YEAR POST-DEVELOPMENT STORM EVENT ENTER Ed: ] [path]filename[ .ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING\210498\POST-2.HYD <-- 2-YEAR STORM EVENT INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW(CFS) OUTFLOW-V0L(CU-FT) 3.97 2.61 51856 2.61 < 3.26 OK INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 144.25 8.00 146.67 PEAK STORAGE: 2210 CU-FT ENTER (d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING\210498\POST-2.RTE f.tr G\Atad2010\1069r.Caxs\Cm,'=2:1698 R..te Cakculat■ens F.rai.do.. Pap 2 e!3 Printed May 06,2011 4/ r_ 7 1 TDC Expansion ROUTE Calculations - System Model Routing Verification 10-YEAR POST-DEVELOPMENT STORM EVENT ENTER [d: J [path]filename[ .extj OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING\210498\POST-10.HYD <-- 10-YEAR STORM EVENT INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW(CFS) OUTFLOW-VOL(CU-FT) 5.70 4,92 74712 4.92 = 4.92 OK INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 144.25 7.83 147.82 PEAK STORAGE: 3320 CU-FT ENTER (d: ] [path]filename[ .extj FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C:\ODRAWING\210498\POST-10.RTE 25-YEAR POST-DEVELOPMENT STORM EVENT ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C:\ODRAWING\210498\POST-25.HYD <-- 25-YEAR STORM EVENT INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-.INFL.OW(CFS). PEAK-OUTFLOW(GFS) OUTFLOW-VOL(CU-FT) 6.52 5.58 85602 5.58 < 5.71 OK INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 144.25 7.83 148.40 PEAK STORAGE: 3680 CU-FT ENTER (d: ] [pathjfilename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C: \ODRAWING\210498\POST-25.RTE G\Acad20101210498\Cass\c v 2=498 flow C.Vcoat ons F;nai.daca Pap 3 of 3 n vriMad.Aptd 14,2011 A • 2-Year Storm Events Through Stor Tech® Detention System • tiy�'ky4'•' ti k.^$1 • 4ti ix .----z.::::.::.i-1 lh i1 r 3.J } = i-'h 111 .`:l:_ ., 1 t ih i 4 r Y : fi S � `4h¢�ii. "ir hlili ,ti ,..,..:,:is,,-.: ...,', J y #yt ,r , it ts§ ,w�. tii.ti'�.� ..t r 2 fit i 5i t h1 L h CC }t•`'l i�1•l i `h S x • 4•l A t: 1 } \ S% i a t�;}i t ♦ i . $. , -$'3 A 1 1 w Y • - y O 5 ..:,.,::::,-,,.„:„§:-.;;; ;;;;,....;:..,,,,,,,,,,,...,.-,.. ikh�hti } .W..._.w ____ .3 •') N'. 1 st# fi 1[ !St'�! {• 5 �A P r J j 1 } _ e 6 ,G 3 S 4,ei 44 4. .6 �-i` _ ": do.I, t f> i = v ^ ..v S ?.,•: ..;.: .:.., ; {f w fir, i V �■ `�'' eh, p,. 4o. h. b• 1• ib, ®• ff5, 43 keA• tti Rte• ��. k ,y %, 61 Nom. Ng. ry (o �1. rye, ri. -1, �� �� Time(hems) _ --o-2-Year Ptis-Dev Ruoff — ►—2-Year t Dev Runoff 2-Year Detained Runoff 1 0-Year Storm Events Through Stonn' Tecii.Detention System • , . .. , . , . ,.,, , . .. ., • . . . . ... .,...„.. • . 6 ..,,,*:m: ,- --. - .....• '...v.-....,-;‘,.'-.•-. . -•-. .,.,, -- •- - -. , - .- . . .. : ••, . ,.-.' • --.:,.--.,..,..‹......:..._;:.-,-.,•: .-----,-.::-.-.:.: ,..:,-..i. iir,...7,,,,,..*:::r.,::1:::::i.,,,,iti.....t-,,,,,-,:;,-.,:i.,:ki„,.:.,::•,.;,..,.,.....-, .,,...,-_.-:.--.„-.-.,.:,,, .. .,,s= it„,i,,,, , , ; :, ,*,.,:,*:.::::.:::::::::.*;,:::::,,*.:::-..i.:,..t,-:-.....-..-:..:.:-.1-..,;:- ... -'.,..-,,. :. , . :..;;.-- ,• ---,-3„., - . , : : . „ - . .' ' . . ... . -.1'-`,••-;-•:,....-''...:-..."..::-..:::::::::.::::."----..:-.'.'-:::........::::;-:::::-....:-...-1'., .„....,,,...,.„:„..:„„„,,.„.....„.-„, . ... , . . -,..x.....,..:,:,...:-.,-,,s,..,.,..--.,:.-.,.....-.:. •...: . . ., . ..: 5 ' :...,::::‘ ;,..,:....,:>:;.-..--:•-:-..,,•:•.,...,..-,..:: -• •• ...- -: -„ -,..:,,,,,,,,,,.2.,„A.,:k,,,„,,,,„‘„,,,,,,,,,, „x‘xf..,-.,..:....,:-:,:,:;,....,:,::,,...-,;.:•;.:„.....-:-.--,::•. - ., . .. -: • . • • • - .., .‹,,•,,•,. . • :.•• . . ..,..:. •• . ..:: ,••r.: .-,:-.,v•.:.•;...„7.....-.•;.....,:•-•,.....-....,.;,,,,-..::,,,,,,;f7:-,......:...:,,. ...,....:„:„.....,,:-.:.;:,........‘,.;,..,..,::•:•....,. :- :,•,.:-.: . ,. --. • . %A..,:::',Nr•:>.:1,......,_..,:::•:::,..,:-..x.:,...:::,,,:x....„:,.;,,...:.-.., •.•. ,-- .. ,,:•.,,, . • . ;, • • . •. . , .: .• . ,.. ;• ., • . . . , . , •. • ,: .:-::.• ::••„:' •.: ....• ......;.::',...-..,: :•,--:;•:.-.n;•:,,;•:-..),;•...,,... ..,-,,-;',x-::::::-.ve:.•;;;:•.;,,,:r..-.,:,,...:;:........., .,, , ..-...-• .' -. . . , , , - • - • -, :, .- . . • ?;,%-:'.:-..:`,1:?....,:,L'4,:,:;$::••;;S*;.,1i;;;;;;:-Z.:.•,:::::::.'•.•••:.. .,:,. ..'.•.••'•' "•::•-•,•••','.' •,•f • •• • ', .. ."-- ,.„ ., ., ,,,,;...,,. ' : -• .• • ....... --..,... •,•,,....•••• ,.....,i,;•,,. ,,,.....:.:;.,:,.,:,.., sx-1',,,,:,,;:::::: ::::.,s'ait:,...:,;;;:::::.::,....:..,....,,,.:: ,:.... ,,...,,,,• , . : , .i• .,,,,,,z,.,„',. • ,.:,„ •,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,v, ...., • .,.-..:•, •••--..•:. .., ...: .....,...,.,...„.:.:,... 0.-x<d$',.:•,:.:43:....$.:4.-$.....,•••.-•!•-•-,..:-•••-•-••'•' • • •, • • ' i ,. --------- --- -----.. ,. 4.: • , . .-,„,c .,,,,,,,,, ,. ; ••,,..,,,,,,„.,..- • .- . • •-. ,.........:-.,,.-, :.....,.:„:,-.,..,..,,,.........,,,.-..,;;;; 4 'f.;;;Z:=::;::::-•"...;,;;;;•:.:.:-..-„,.,;::::•:.:!-...-..,• -- : •-•' .• • • , ..;,t, , .,. , . ,, ,i,,,,,.i.•,••••. .i.;;1-,-.,,:,,,,,,>..-,,,,,,,4,?' --,,,--••'4.1`.. ,,- --- • . . ,•,.: . ‘.- :' ..-,.. .,, .•:-...:•..:,-.......-•:„..,,„:,,,,,::::,<.,,:;:. ..,,.:t,....,•:::::::.§:::::<..,,,:,-,,,%.,.....,..:,,,:,,,,,,,•:,..f.,.....„,........;..-•..• . .- ,, ,....?„.•••„......„.„.„,..,.. .....„,„:..,„...,, ......, o....-, „ , . . .. ,-..•,. ,:.. .,:„- •••...,- .....,.,:-.,:..)..,........,.....:,,.....„:,;•,...„;„:„:„.,,,,....;.,...,, . . ., .... .. , . . .. . :*':"...:.::::::::::--.,:,..1;:,,. ..:.,.:..,....._............ , • ,.•. ..,::, ,:..,...t.,.::,:....,. .,,,...,::.:;.:pi:,,..:.:-.:,,:t..;..1-,-,-;......::,• . ,•k,•:, . . .. . . . . , . ‘..... ''''''''':: ''''''''>‘*::i.**:".f.::.z>z.:;:j'•''' ''''':. . .' - ' ' 4 i''''<i,-7•,-.,••'''''.- ''''.:,'•-"--7,C-... .: ' . . . .. .. .",:: ;' • -..• '. . : :-•:;;.• •t • - „ ... . . .. • . ....„,. .,,,.., . 'ii;'.:ii'..::•:?•;?;:•,:cE3.:..:":,i'.?:-.'< •••' .:..., • . -, ' , , 1 '''',;•':. ________.."'!'-•"; " " . ' •, -• -.•, .:.".•-•, •.—• '••', .• •••,2;':-..:".:,:•:::::.-,..;:: 11 •— • •... - • . ....,,... . . .. . ,. . ..,. 3 .::: ,..,.. ..', .....-:.-,: .••:,..:, • • : qi ,t 4, ' ,,,..-.--.,...'o-,,,-i- . , :0-".....:-:.::.,>:-.::::-.4-.:.->.:.....!-i-:-: .....- .. '• f '... . ar7 ,:,,X.'••••'"i".::":::::■:,,e':.:,;:',' ",,::-:•:',.•;„,. ',, . ,..,. U. , . • - , ,.. • ,:.. .. .,•...... .,,:.-,..., • , 10. 'f'...;:::,'N.;>■..":7,se.1:::$:::5 ..'...-'•......''.:,... ' . --,",- ... .. .., _ . .. . +. . $:,,.f..:;',.:::: '......1.2:.",.-, . '. • . ■,!:::•,,....:■:::;*!.:7:`.::`..:,:,i,;f.,),,,;,:,..-:',..:7. :...;,.. ,, . , ... .,.. . :'' ,.., .;,.,, . . . . . l'f. .., ....'..... ' • ' '.''... .• • 4' -,. . . : .• • :, . ,, =';',:■;').Z-.."•::::•:-..f..;:,:•::::;::•::•:•••---..",•:•!.. :.:••••...-• --, . • : ; • , e: 1 • ' ' • . %. : '. • ,,., .•.,.•.......,',,,' ... 1.]:::-..-., ...-,:.1.::.:".•:.•.`,'.',...:-.•'.,;:;•••%':-.',':-.i .::::" .§*"..:,.:•".•-:0 ::.;:?..,';e7.•.;•:.•/'...'" V.'-• :;'• '-:-.''.•'-''.I: A • ' • •,,.. • :- ' • .. • ' .• . •.• •"•!•• •:....'•'.-•"' • :•• :•: • '.•-:-. • '::-:i'•••:-...;•.'-1:'''.',. .-:...:::•-•••.•;•.,*:',•,.,.:,•" ti;:-',::,*',:::::,M,:;:zk.:‘,.;i:p;:,...:•ii:Igii.- ,,,.:..„..;;;;;:::::::.•,,,:•..;•.„•,..::::',---., . . — $ ' ; ,.:,31„ • • ' 1.1• • '.' ':. , ,..„ ..,,,),,(F.,:".'.',r,,, . . .•• '-.' '. ..''''' •:'...,',-:,.:;.:.....'- ':.":".1-'[. ,,,,::::,,;,.`.0:1:::$:::::tii:,•t:g:',.t.:41.,.'4;:;,■;;;.:','•.`,t.'''..,...:.,, ,..;'.-,,,'' .. • , .:•„r,. : ' -•N4.... . ' •.' ' &:. ,t;"''''''" '.‘:' -.'' '',';,c, .' . —. -; ......`...-. •. .. .. .'.:,.: .„, .,...."''', .::::‹Mi'.1,.....:!.:?::X.:•;:,..),k,..,,,..',':..,... • .,.. .. , .... , ,..,,.,.4. . , ,.., 4 ''.,C. . W$i:Mi:i.:*;;;:.::',.;;',.:...:..-.::• 7 : -. - .4:, •:" • , • -, •.. .••-....-.. • • • • • ..- ..........„.,.. . .,:,.b.,..:‘-t.Ao,uti,% 1 '::::• •'-::".:§:.e:i:::..."...:::::::::1" '-....'•. )?'-•4.'6 .v., , ,t4,04,,,,, k.*$'''.:',.‘:-..:::::::::•:::::.,,:•••.1;*:,',:. ,•;••••:" ''',446•64'.4-. . . , . 'i -. ' ' t ,I.,!..,*.bc-tOrirot*Ak4,..4)1..4•:+&..-Xi.s.44.0.0 .•.4..?•40vIVA*-4''.,, .....7. , .,:.:,..,....,,-,...:.:-.7•.;._ ....:%,:,:`:.•.;:•<.$:•W.:Z:.-•;' !":i..:•5!•:''''.'':••• - . 0 .!...:-...::,‘•::..::::::...-4::::.::.,...:::: Y • ,; , ..; . ; ; . ;i. .•., ,..4,,,,s,,,..,,,..(,,,,,,,,1 . , ,.. .,,,. . ..,...,... ..,,..., ! ,..,:,,.., ....;,,,,,.,., : . :::- .:::',"•• •:,-;'••••:-.:-• • 111- - • • • ' . •-•''-• - ,- . ''' *--•-. 'C''' 7''' C.:;\ 43 n? '(\ 'C' cb'l 4‘ 4.:*%.' (9 4k r°". tom5Y 1/447 fl•#* fbes): t):(k. <3)i's (')cPnt\b43:14‘.. 4<bn?r5'■°3<k. `1,Q; (1,%-.`1,'` ). 1,1'43M,rbn)• rt,b`. ri,('). rt." Oc? 0- \• 1.- .b. t.• co. <0- co- A• ib or t„St• N N N. k_ \ r, N. Time(hours) .,.., _ . . 10-Year Pre-Dev Runoff --0—10-Year Post-Dev Runoff 10-Year Detained Runoff '1 --"c3.... ......... __.„ ... 11:''' 7-4 25-Year Storm Events Through StormTech® Detention System i r ■ ■ }fSx tt i ;b. • y'yt' yY..'� ♦ .: _ jh 1�11'ti'�^1r^. r g ,...',',."''.';''':''':t.''''.1.7!''' ti♦ti -- die2?� wt ♦ y ,,,;/+;1,t;,,�a,,1. ._ .. r ♦ r ♦.?'.. .... •o" ° �, p, k� F, o �. ,�4• �O, �,4. 4M N,,,. , '�, Ay. �° \6 N,� ►.o �° do do '` �`� �`� �,� ,lo �� • Time(hours) --*-25-Year Pre-Dev Runoff -e--•25-Year Post-Dev Runoff ' 25-Year Detained Runoff STM MH fun 40 —.q111.4. f ... RBA t51 95 17 tE OUT 15/147 50 . i ‘ . I e'e tt4 iET:45 50 1 fi 24 e OUT 05114545 .' it ir.7... 1,1 24'tE OUT"145.35 ; d ./, / t i 1 11 t 1 / t FLOM ,r ,f,•, -77••■4111110614 ' • I ; 1 ' ."..--1 ..1.--i, i' • • . • •...-‹ i ‘• ' '' "‘ . ' ••• / ir .1 I „.: iY P li-i } ,. . : 1 •,•± I 1 ', i 11 .„ 1. 1 . 1 .• • - • A • ' i '-'''- ik \ , \ V ' ir _,..:.-, it/ \ I 4 Ilt ..,' 1 , , ,. ., ......!..z.,75az : :l . ").,. ' TiTTIT 1 li i i 11 i i, i 4 . / 2-'1 ki.://i , :,.1t,„ . .., I:" ' iithi — 1 - / , '1 t . i i I'i ' ' :I 1' i 1 / it , i : GCM-470R ROWS ' 1 ; 1 i 71 • t. • • •i 1/ * 1 I I 1 • \ 1 g / * ;/•••••.„.... 1 t L 1 ti 1, \ ,,,,t/ q , . 1 I 1 1 I ', : 1 II / t . . i ! F"---'! MOVE FIRE WATER UNE TO FLOWUNE ' .* /if / ',.. . : . i'•`-' ,L,.....„,......___-_,- E 145 5(ACROS5 TOP OF CHAMBERS). • RE-ALIGN AROUND CHAMBER 991) ', f .. / /1 if-'--."'•-// .7' n •-,. •',. ii ... ..,. .. , ,. • * -/,.:`.„7.,r -'', 4111b, Air \ , .4,i:::/iiirtr/ . aw .,,--/ !1' 411-4*/./ . ij' 1,7/ 1 r 1 . , i /I/ ./..) ,01/ . , ,,41,kf , ., ,. t- .... .;27 \ 1 1 1 1 i,2 4/ -i ,, ,, :. ., , jr/ ,-,A'ri . ,./-,,z.... . , : A. /,........ ,,,,,,i . . /---...„,,t_k„,....,/i _ • ... „, , ' MOVE OAS UNE TO E'146 IACROSS ' "" ;" .'1" Alt 7 . ''. - •?'"• • • -.1y-si •• ,-,st-,....--- ,..;',",til, ioP OP CHAMBERS).CARE-A/JON 1,•'"' 4 ' 1 . — -t-——•.c''' AROUND CHAMBER BED t. 'ttc,::`\ \ 'l / I/ f P'*••■„,,,e I I 1 i / /. - ‘ .,i I/ ' 24'tE t / .t, •• ./As!...,...../, .,.2 / ....:..e• 145 35 , !,,. ;:: •,, 1. i / t r •TM . ; /''.{ i - • 1/ if / , ."--)i''"'-- 4"_ i''• ,t 1. . '''''''(: •_„..irt 76/192 96 Alle 144 ig.: All 'i..--:1, "IN tl*/146 77 -4... -I- -24:164111p)145 45 '" . r PE ...-'<•' it : , . .F `11.2'tt TR* Mt • ' 1,,,) k-.2,:, , ."S' • 2,,. r...e. r,t,„', , ' ' RN 15251 .. ....;••< . •;! 17 SIN E.SE:)14 15 .....2. ...i. • '-'•-'-''' •=t4179VCO/W•Alig, / --•••• - 15'tE OUT chrt1 10 , ' li i ' ...■!, / ' 7: ..if cyr(NW 43-re ...-----Au , ii RIM 152.5.2 0 4'E IN tSE)143.75 ,,',' rij /7 5'E OUT(W)141.50 .'t ,...,--A • ..-' . i 1., lr :- ••<_...,--- 'V / '' 0 ; Mit ', .■••- i , /I / I 1.•,.,......./ . / RIM 151 73 .... .f• r sua .,.....-'•-•",,.4/ / .i,..._, ....-- i . 1 8^15 145.73 ott ••-•• ..--- 11 ,--r-:- . " 100.0‘00 q \ "*".3 — ' '4 7><-.r .: 0 ._., 4. 1 i : it• nrameo lib .,..irte 141.44 , ,r 14000 I '. t a I 1 ,',/ „/".. : , ,,...- ...Pr' ..., i , . '.1 ..5-'''' . ___ to ; '•'' I I ".. a '.--"....---- --..----.' .,,...s... i ...,._, •,.:'.- i ----'--/ Ai 0 i , .. I ..., s 140.72 1/ 0101007 ---...."..."i. / if ., • ' -- ,--- 4.01.3.r. L , ®/ , / . 0 / r`,....... 5. • f -•-•..t •.•- • Air tti Al . , „...... ; / . : . ,: ....._ ____ IF , l ' .'' Ilk , ,Y, / .„ , , i . . . . .... ., , . e / - 1111 , '-- ' '.----_,...••• / ■Allb, PRELIMINARY SITE UTILITY PLAN '117--t1/41.I•5. -•,......„----- Nair ;1•Nritelluill.......ralum YA-C-k— E-Ci 60 90 Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Storm water Calculations for TDC Stormwater Analysis for Tigard Distribution Center Water Quality Treatment .. . . . . File:C:',ACad201O\210.198.CaIrsuCn if\210498 PRELIMINARY Stormwater Report.docx Printed: May 06,2011 f Y VLAIK ENGINEERS 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 Job Name: TDC EXPANSION F 503.248.9263 E vtmk @vlmk.com Job No.: 210498 W www.vtmk.com Date: 15-Apr-11 v 1,(11:59t yar9.So9Yrzgh; 2oo9 y _tg_cunsu;tin Er peer Ali Rahts Reservag. Water Quality Calculations Based on the CWS June 2007 Design and Construction Standards Treat Using Contech StormFilter 60" Manhole Unit: Each 22" Tall Cartridge Treats 18 gpm (0.040 cfs) SF MH 1 54,148 sf of Impervious Surface Area* Water Quality Volume (Vwq): Vwq = Impervious Area • 0.36" Vwq = 54,148 sf • 0.36 in • 1/12 ft/in Vwq zi•••.1E,624 of I..... ... Water Quality Flowrate (Qwq): Qwq = Vwq/ Time Time = 4 hours Qwq = 0.113.. cfs < 0.120 cfs Use 3-Cartridge Storm Filter Manhole Unit Water Quality Requirements Met Water quality area = new developed impervious areas (former pervious area converted to impervious area) 210498 Water Quality Calculations.xisx PAGE .� 60" MANHOLE MFS FILTER DESIGN NOTES 60'MANHOLE MFS TREATMENT CAPACITY VARIES BY NUMBER OF FILTER CARTRIDGES OR PER REGULATIONS. MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC INTERNAL BYPASS CAPACITY IS 1.5 CFS.IF SITE CONDITIONS EXCEED 1.5 CFS,AN UPSTREAM BYPASS STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED. THE STANDARD 60'MANHOLE CONFIGURATION IS SHOWN. ALTERNATE CONFIGURATIONS ARE AVAILABLE FOR SIDE INLET AND OUTLET LOCATIONS. OUTLET BAFFLE A Al 11 1p.I1 . A CARTRIDGE HEIGHT 22' 12' L MINIMUM RECOMMENDED HYDRAULIC DROP(H) 27' 1 T' TREATMENT BY MEDIA SURFACE AREA 2 1 9P' ' 2 9pmm' 1 9F ' CARTRIDGE FLOW RATE(gpm) 18 9 10 5 FLOW ■"�i /� � �� - 1.--1 INLET . _,. OUTLET if/� '1I l:11.111( . OUTLET ' NNW - SOX SITE SPECIFIC DATA REQUIREMENTS _'/ STRUCTURE ID SF MH 1 (72'}O.D. WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE(ds) 0.113 60"I.D.MANHOLE PEAK FLOW RATE(Cfs) 0.53 STRUCTURE tilliillIlloIIIINIIIII\O RETURN PERIOD OF PEAK FLOW(yrs) 25 PLAN VIEW B-B #OF CARTRIDGES REQUIRED 3 N.T.Q. CARTRIDGE FLOW RATE 18 GPM ',I{in'S�:1N1rL'"cR ., z ""' MEDIA TYPE(CSF,PERLITE,ZPG,CAC,PHS) PERLRE .f,....,.,_.-r SCc.i t4!"Ni ✓ PIPE DATA: I.E. MATERIAL DIAMETER :b. rs,.. INLET PIPE#1 143.75 PVC 4' INLET PIPE#2 N/A NIA N/A a ;.•.' OUTLET PIPE 141.50 PER SPECS 6" CONTRACTOR TO GROUT '1';•,..-•••; .4--.. TO FINISHED GRADE RIM ELEVATION ( 152.52 (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION) ANTI-FLOTATION BALLAST • WIDTH ' HEIGHT N/A N/A GRADE FRAME AND COVER NOTES/SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: RING/RISERS (DIAMETER VARIES) o. N.T.S. 'PER ENGINEER OF RECORD 'M1 IIMIIIIIIIIIIIII4111111111111111M IIIIMIIIMI f 1 PREFORMANCE SPECIFICATION FILTER CARTRIDGES SHALL BE MEDIA-FILLED,PASSIVE,RADIAL FLOW,AND HAVE VARIABLE FLOW CONTROL. RADIAL MEDIA DEPTH SHALL BE B .:....:_.+4 74NCHES(MIN.). FILTER MEDIA CONTACT TIME SHALL BE AT LEAST 37 SECONDS. SPECIFIC FLOW RATE SHALL BE 2 GPM/13f(MAXIMUM). SPECIFIC 1 FLOW RATE IS THE MEASURE OF THE FLOW(GPM)DEVIDED BY THE MEDIA SURFACE CONTACT AREA(SF). MEDIA VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE SHALL BE 6 GPM/CF Of MEDIA(MAXIMUM). GENERAL NOTES i= B 1. CONTECH TO PROVIDE ALL MATERIALS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. DIMENSIONS MARKED WITH()ARE REFERENCE DIMENSIONS. ACTUAL DIMENSIONS MAY VARY. `D- 3. FOR SITE SPECIFIC DRAWINGS WITH DETAILED VAULT DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS,PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CONTECH CONSTRUCTION rpi.00m g INLET PIPE {• 4. MFS FILTER WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DESIGN DATA AND INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING. }• 5. STRUCTURE SHALL MEET AASHTO HS20 AND CASTINGS SHALL MEET AASHTO M306 LOAD RATING,ASSUMING GROUNDWATER ELEVATION AT, N ;• '?"1 _ OR BELOW,THE OUTLET PIPE INVERT ELEVATION. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CONFIRM ACTUAL GROUNDWATER ELEVATION 5 6. FILTER CARTRIDGES SHALL BE MEDIA-FILLED,PASSIVE,SIPHON ACTUATED,RADIAL FLOW,AND SELF CLEANING. RADIAL MEDIA DEPTH SHALL BE 7-INCHES. FILTER MEDIA CONTACT TIME SHALL BE AT LEAST 39 SECOPDS. • ,w,,rte. .. r 7. SPECIFIC FLOW RATE IS EQUAL TO THE FILTER TREATMENT CAPACITY(gpm)DIVIDED BY THE FILTER CONTACT SURFACE AREA(sq It). .— •is ■I I INSTALLATION NOTES `f ' ' ' , r 1. ANY SUB-BASE.BACKFILL DEPTH,AND/OR ANTI-FLOTATION PROVISIONS ARE SITE-SPECIFIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS AND SHALL BE i . ' i SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD. 2. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE EQUIPMENT WITH SUFFICIENT UFTING AND REACH CAPACITY TO LIFT AND SET THE MFS FILTER VAULT(LIFTING CLUTCHES PROVIDED). yy,, 3. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL JOINT SEALANT BETWEEN ALL VAULT SECTIONS AND ASSEMBLE VAULT. z MFS FILTER MANIFOLD RAIN OUTLET PIPE 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE,INSTALL,AND GROUT PIPES. MATCH OUTLET PIPE INVERT WITH OUTLET BAY FLOOR. $ CARTRIDGE MANIFOLD 5. CONTRACTOR TO TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO PROTECT CARTRIDGES FROM CONSTRUCTION-RELATED EROSION RUNOFF- SECTION A-A g NTS. M ` �� 60" MANHOLE CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS INC. MFS FILTER 9625 Centre 0 r.off 45069 STANDARD DETAIL . 6 800-338-1122 513-645-7000 513-645-7993 FAX Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Storm water Calculations for TDC Stormwater Analysis for Tigard Distribution Center Stormwater Conveyance File:G:V1cad2010i210498\Caic54Civi1\210498 PRELIMINARY Stormwater Report.docx Printed; May 06,2011 PiGe- MC EXPANSION 207540 4.26'16" R II 170.x' a 1 .w 0 . 13.1 5 oI'174"� "cb n aomsl OUSTING BUILDING �rr/ O / 0000 'f ' ✓� � 7 �} ,.,.,. ,,,,, II I I I I I III It II If II I I - i —1fi ..,.«.v 1 i1 ' �• !6 s'.1_ ,,��f1 it �. 7 4 s I . f i4� r 1 i!f° ' •.- t r��. 3 , i a ,a, i f 7 t t;i f ,-aur ._. �. 4,_ . ' j n'fi'r ._. _•_ __ J.-'i E titan it Z * I I.,i t a I , �is�� ���t. ` I _I t ; ;bl._ �+ ��M . r" i i .. ,. _ 4'M _ ._. ' _ Via :! „�/ r i.' 1 �: ; ( .ft- �, • • __,..,,. ..- -- wt+= (�air .Q - f �� 4 _ o`er LS 082 2 90Q.83' �� __ -° 4st�• ,�. � � !, + r � 4 u. PoIM 151,2. ST '�°s-oogia ST ' .o i�,a-srs`r rr x a'oas ST ST }°it S a,,s ,Jeo s ' S :.'.'k . , ao f t - - — ._ - - 5-f�8'22"2ZYY 1 t 06.33' f �� + `uoarS. / 5 �4 } v s3- c10j- poi150.55t tQ ' ._ c1a.225s fN1.0a5 ciG.�14, v • j .. ..._ / 101.3+ � i' J� w�toa }p„,50 W oasnNG eun.owc ,' _� UTILITY PLAN 1. 60' 60 0 60 120 1e0 PAGE 34 7'I rd Distribution Center narY St0. wager Ca/c on S for PPENDIX 7-D .•. ��t`c p�Rt�j;A::::T20;7p��1�CiY11121 0498 PitEt]tyihR Y storrrwd.er kt'G„rt adrk Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Storm water Calculations for TDC Appendix A: Soil Survey and Hydrologic Classification Fria: G:'Acad2 0 1 0 12 108 98\Ca1csWfvi1\210498 PRELIMINARY Stormwater Repart.docx Printed:May 04,2011 I L/ E)\ •W4 C}N Hydrologic Soil G�pC Expansion)n County,Oregon 210498 z r ` 518800 51854.1 51:.:50 51: 20 5189 519£300 51';'' 45°25 50' „.y,. 45`25 5J 1iH ' ✓• �v r2; .n(`1, f ,. r+' t 5 fi {(�y :5 • i fir. f,- `1,* %-!:.,::::,.„- _........,,_.........,e,,,,..,::::,-_,..., ,., ,.,:c.,,,,:4,.,,,v,,,,,, ,, * , .r: { qti ! r nz ::,saw rt ewk k .a�• pw- _ .-._:•� -=�°` - tide-� �'� Wyk _ sou' , ,•. . 'G' _ .N v � �'' It "'"Y $ '�F�� y'' x tha •ii + may, e vy ,,*,, -a"'�lIDY :. jK✓ 1 1 z S ,,4 2 3'Y�r k # er T . d»•F y Y.,r.,` w� <r ''e. „�_?'�.Ea'r.s�:t.r a`..,�..�.-;.. .... ..'.'.f;. 45"29 ,r.n.. .. 45`2S'38 5: :00 5f884G 5`5$80 51 :�3 519000 5f9040 E"�R Scae:i1 730 r£ an As.zst$S'x 11'}s3asei. H 1 "keEers 0 1$ 30 60 90 Feet 0 50 0 200 300 USDA Natural Resources Web Sol Surrey X112:'2011 J (:nnsPrvat nn Stern Natinnat f:nnnarattvi' Sn9 ScIrvav Pana 1 of 8 �//��11a Hydrologic Soil Group—Washington County,Oregon TDC Expansion TDC EXPANSION 210498 Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Solt Group--Summary by•li ap Unit Washington County,Oregon • Nap unit symbol J Map unit name 1 Rating Acres in AO! Pertxrtt o1AOt 22 Huberly silt loam 0 2.8 l 40 8% 142 i Verboort silty day loam 0 4.1 i 59.2% j Totals for Area of Interest el] 100.03E Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups(A, B, C, and D)and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Qroup.A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential)when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture, These soils have'a-Moderate rate of*ate"transmission. . . ... . . ...... : .:... . .. . . Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture.These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential)when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (AID, BID, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified i " Natural Resources Web Soi Survey 4/12/2011 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 A2 Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Storm water Calculations for TDC Appendix B•• TR-55 Curve Number Table .. file:GNACad2010\210498\Catu\Ovtti210498 PRELIMINARY Stormwater Report.docx Printed: May 04,2011 TDC EXPANSION 210498 Chapter 2 .Estimating Runoff Technical Release 55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Table 2-2a Runoff curve numbers for urban areas 11 Curve numbers for Cover description hydrologic soil group Average percent Cover type and hydrologic condition impervious area V A 8 C D Fully developed urban areas (vegetation established) Open space(lawns,parks,golf courses,cemeteries,etc.)al: Poor condition(grass cover<50%) 68 79 86 89 Fair condition(grass cover 50%to 75%) 49 69 79 Good condition(grass cover>75%) 39 61 74 ( 80 ) Impervious areas: �..J Paved parking lots,roofs,driveways,etc. (excluding right-of-way) 98 98 98 98 Streets and roads: Paved;curbs and storm sewers(excluding right-of-way) 98 98 98 98 Paved;open ditches(including right-of-way) 83 89 92 93 Gravel(including right-of-way) 76 85 89 91 Dirt(including,right-of-way) ,,.,. . . 72 82 87 89 Western desert.urlian areas: ' Natural desert landscaping(pervious areas only)./ 63 77 85 88 Artificial desert landscaping(impervious weed barrier, desert shrub with 1-to 2-inch sand or gravel mulch and basin borders) 96 96 96 96 Urban districts: Commercial and business 85 89 92 94 95 Industrial..... .... 72 81 88 91 93 Residential districts by average lot size: 1/8 acre or less(town houses) 65 77 85 90 92 1/4 acre 38 61 '75 83 87 1/3 acre 30 57 72 81 86 1/2 acre 25 54 70 80 85 1 acre 20 51 68 79 84 2 acres 12 46 65 77 82 Developing urban areas Newly graded areas (pervious areas only,no vegetation)1/ 77 86 91 94 Idle lands(CN's are determined using cover types similar to those in table 2-2e). Average runoff condition,and la=0.2S. 2 The average percent impervious area shown was used to develop the composite CN's.Other assumptions are as follows:impervious areas are directly connected to the drainage system,impervious areas have a CN of 98,and pervious areas are considered equivalent to open space in good hydrologic condition.CN's for other combinations of conditions may be computed using figure 2-3 or 2-4. 3 CN's shown are equivalent to those.of pasture.Composite CN's may be computed for other combinations of open space cover type. Composite CN's for natural desert landscaping should be computed using figures 2-3 or 2-4 based on the impervious area percentage (CN=98)and the pervious area CN.The pervious area CN's are assumed equivalent to desert shrub in poor hydrologic condition. 5 Composite CN's to use for the design of temporary measures during grading and construction should be computed using figure 2-3 or 2-4 based on the degree of development(impervious area percentage)and the CN's for the newly graded pervious areas. B1 (210-VI-TR-55,Second Ed.,June 1986) 2_5 Tigard Distribution Center Preliminary Storm water Calculations for TDC Appendix C: Design Storm Events G ,Acad2010‘2104981Calcs,,Ciyil‘210498 PRELIMINARY Stormyvater Report dcxx Prrntecr May 04,2011 TDC EXPANSION 210498 24-HOUR RAINFALL DEPTHS RECURRENCE TOTAL INTERVAL PRECIPITATION (YEARS) DEPTH (INCHES) 2 2.50 5 3. 10 10 3.45 25 3.90 50 4.20 100 4.50 Ci 24-HOUR RAINFALL DEPTHS C1eanWater Services RAWING NO. 1 280 REVISED 12—Os Our commitment is clear. Thipac± �tafewtevif CONSULTING 503.222.4453 E N G I N E E R S 503.248.9263 vlmk @vlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 www.vlmk.com TDC - Parking Impact Study May 11th, 2011 MEMORANDUM TO: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn.: Cheryl Caines FROM: Bill G. Lambert TDC - Parking - Impact Study 1. Transportation System: Traffic impacts on the transportation system to SW Hunziker Road should not be affected by this development. We are proposing to upgrade the parking lots to meet city standards and the traffic (autos/trucks) should not change in quantity, but simply have better parking and maneuvering on the site. 2. Drainage System: The site is currently sloped to catch basins and piped to the existing storm pipe in SW Hunziker Road. The proposed parking lot additions will be similar. The site stormwater system will be diverted before it leaves the site, going through a new storm water detention facility under the new south parking lot. Detained stormwater will tie into the existing storm system with the help of a new pump station. The natural drainage of the site is north to south and the new parking lots will work in conjunction with the existing parking lots. The stormwater will be treated (water quality) through a StormFilter WO manhole, in compliance with Clean Water Services requirements. 3. Park System: The nearest park facility to the site appears to be Potso Dog Park approximately 1/2 mile south off of SW Hunziker Road. Fanno Creek Park is more than 2 miles away. The proposed development has no impact on these parks. ' Structural Engineering•Civil Engineering•Industrial Engineering•Planning•Studies/Evaluations•Entitlement File: G:\Acad2010\210498\01 Site Design Review\Impact-Study-1.docx Page 1 of 2 Printed: May 10,2011 TDC - Parking Impact Study 4. Water System: The existing facility is hooked up to the City of Tigard water in SW Hunziker Road. The proposed development does not include water service. No additional impact is proposed with this development. 5. Sewer System: The existing facility is hooked up to the City of Tigard sanitary sewer in SW Hunziker Road. The proposed development does not include sanitary service. No additional impact is proposed with this development. 6. Noise Impacts: The existing site has two large industrial buildings that will remain unchanged as part of this proposed development. We are adding two new parking lots to the site and substantial amount of landscaping. The site is surrounded by industrial zones and uses. There should be no change in the current noise levels. 7. Schools: The current development is an industrial facility (manufacturing/warehouse) that will not generate additional students that would impact local schools. 8. Business Impact: The existing site currently has two large industrial buildings with limited parking spaces. The proposed parking lot additions will enhance the site for both current employees and general aesthetics for the area. The proposed truck turning area in the north lot will make the truck maneuvering more efficient and help with overall business appearance. The proposed changes to the south side of Building B will enhance the appearance of the building and promote better business use and activities. File: G:\Acad2010\210498\01 Site Design Review\Impact-Study-l.docx Page 2 of 2 Printed: May 10,2011 B leo 19ica. 1 Assessment Natural Resource Assessment for Proposed Parking Lot Expansion at the Tigard Distribution Center on SW Hunziker Road in Tigard, Oregon (Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Section 1BD, Tax lot 200) -::), ___,: S 4 Prepared for Ali Karl Klokke Boise, ID Prepared by Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Wilsonville, Oregon (503) 570-0800 April 12, 2011 N` A Natural Resource Assessment for Proposed Parking Lot Expansion at the Tigard Distribution Center on SW Hunziker Road in Tigard, Oregon (Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Section 1 BD, Tax lot 200) Prepared for Karl Klokke 1109 N 21'` Street Boise, ID 83702 Prepared by Shawn Eisner Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. 9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 180 Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 (503) 570-0800 (503) 570-0855 FAX PHS Project Number: 4773 April 12, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 3.0 DELINEATION OF WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS 1 4.0 VEGETATED CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT 2 4.1 Vegetated Corridor Width Determination 2 4.2 Vegetated Corridor Plant Communities 3 4.3 Vegetated Corridor Plant Community Condition 5 5.0 PROPOSED PROJECT 5 5.1 Vegetated Corridor Enhancement 6 APPENDIX A: Figures APPENDIX B: Wetland Determination Data Point APPENDIX C: NRA Definitions and Methodology and References 1.0 INTRODUCTION Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. (PHS) conducted a natural resource assessment for Tigard Distribution Center, an existing commercial property located at 8005 SW Hunziker Road (T2S R1W Section 1BD, tax lot 200). Visits to the site occurred on March 3 and April 4, 2011. The project area is shown on Figure 1; Figure 2 identifies existing conditions at the site. Figures are in Appendix A. This report presents the definitions and the methodology used to assess the natural resources on the property as required by Clean Water Services. The natural resource assessment for this site includes a vegetated corridor analysis as well as a discussion of on and off-site sensitive areas. Appendix B contains wetland determination data points. A brief discussion of the definitions and the methodology required by CWS to determine the location and extent regulated vegetated corridors within the project area is located in Appendix C. 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The project study area includes all of tax lot 200, on the north side of SW Hunziker Road,just west of Wall Street. The site currently includes two large interconnected buildings utilized for commercial/light industrial uses, with parking to the west and a railroad spur to the east (Figure 2). Undeveloped areas include a lawn between Hunziker Road and the southern building; and a less frequently mowed grass area, with Himalayan blackberry beyond that, at the north end of the site. Adjoining properties are largely developed, though there remain undeveloped areas near the north end of the site. Right of way associated with Highway 217 borders the northeast portion of the site. 3.0 DELINEATION OF WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS On-site sensitive areas The project site includes a small portion of two separate wetlands. One is located north of a parking lot at the very northern limits of the site and extends off-site. The second wetland is located east of the railroad spur along the east side of the site, and also extends off-site. The area of the northern wetland located on site is just 96 square feet. In its entirety, the wetland appears to be much less than a tenth of an acre in size. The central portion of the wetland is characterized by seasonal ponding of up to eight or ten inches in depth. Vegetation within the wetland is dominated by Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra) and Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia). Clustered rose (Rosa pisocarpa) and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) were both documented but they are not common within the on-site portion of the wetland. The wetland edge, and much of the adjoining wetland, is dominated by Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor). The on-site portion of the wetland east of the railroad spur is 1,932 sq. ft. in size. Though conditions east of the site did not permit an accurate assessment of the off-site limits of the wetland, adjoining development and conditions in the Highway 217 right of way to the north and east suggest that this wetland is very likely no larger than one-quarter acre in size. The on-site portion of this wetland is poorly vegetated. This is in part the result of the poor soil substrate. Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. NRA for Tigard Distribution Center/PHS#4773 Page 1 Documented conditions immediately east of the gravel area associated with the railroad tracks include 4 to 8 inches of highly organic material with a very tight"mass" of roots. Below the root mass and organics the gravels associated with the rail spur are encountered. Another reason for low vegetation cover is the extent of shading. Off-site trees provide dense shading from the east, while the building provides shading from the west. As was documented in Sampling Point 1 (see Appendix B), on-site vegetation includes saplings of Oregon ash, Himalayan blackberry and soft rush (Juncus effusus). Other noted species include black cottonwood(Populus trichocarpa) saplings, field horsetail (Equisetum arvense), hawkbit(Leontodon nudicaulis), and reed canarygrass. By comparison, the off-site portion of the wetland includes mature trees of the aforementioned species, as well as pine (Pinus sp.), English hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna), and weeping birch (Betula pendula). Groundcover includes a greater coverage of soft rush, as well as sword fern (Polystichum munitum) and a substantial coverage of English ivy (Hedera helix) Off-site sensitive area The possibility of delineating the limits of wetlands on adjoining properties north and west of the project site was investigated but no agreement could be obtained from the land owner. As such, the approximate limits of wetlands on adjoining properties was completed via off-site observations of existing conditions, as well as a review of recent aerial photographs. Figure 2 includes the estimated limits of wetlands north and west of the site. In addition to an extensive cover of Himalayan blackberry, the wetland includes mixed willows, Oregon ash, and English and/or Douglas hawthorn. The herbaceous areas are presumed to be dominated by reed canarygrass with soft rush. 4.0 VEGETATED CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT 4.1 Vegetated Corridor Width Determination As the on-site wetlands are just a portion of larger features, the approximate extent of these wetlands, as well as other sensitive areas in the vicinity of the site were documented. Figure 2 identifies the location of on-site wetlands and the approximate location of wetlands adjoining the study area. Based upon our assessment, both the northern and eastern wetlands are significantly less than one-half acre in size and are not hydrologically connected to intermittent or perennial creeks. The additional off-site wetland that exists north and west of the site appears to be larger than one-half acre in size and is hydrologically connected to Red Rock Creek. As a result of existing conditions, the on-site wetlands will require a 25 foot vegetated corridor(VC) while the larger off-site wetland will require a 50 foot VC. All slopes on the site area much less than 25 percent, so there is no requirement for VC wider than the standard minimum. A single slope measurement is shown east of the northern wetland. Additional measurements could not be included as a result of adjoining development. The eastern wetland includes no slope measurements because the VC slopes parallel those of the adjoining wetland. As such there is no way to measure slopes perpendicular to the wetland. Though slopes do not result in modifications to the regulated widths, existing development does truncate the VC of both on and off-site sensitive areas. There is actually no VC west of the eastern wetlands, as the railroad spur extends to the edge of the wetland. Existing VC is limited to areas north and south of the wetland. Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. NRA for Tigard Distribution Center/PHS#4773 Page 2 The northern wetland is located within 4 feet of the existing parking lot; only areas east of the lot can facilitate the full VC width of 25 feet. Similarly, VC associated with wetlands west of the site are truncated by the parking lot, as well as an off-site gravel and asphalt area used for parking tractor trailers (see Figure 2A). 4.2 Vegetated Corridor Plant Communities As vegetated corridors adjoining on-site sensitive areas have been subject to infrequent mowing and/or general lack of landscape maintenance, community condition reflects the degraded nature of these areas. The existing corridors were inventoried in three generally distinct vegetation communities. Community A represents a small area of grass(lawn) located east of the existing parking lot; Community B encompasses a thicket of Himalayan blackberry north and north east of the parking lot; and Community C includes vegetation north and south of the east wetland. Photo documentation of these communities is included in Figures 3A-3B. Plant Community A (165 sq. ft.) includes only non-native species in a mowed area east of the existing parking lot. Though a portion of this community immediately along the parking lot is actually mulched and unvegetated, the bare area was not significant enough to warrant a separate community. This community lacks native plants and a tree canopy and is therefore in degraded condition. The following table summarizes the species distribution within this plant community. In addition to those species below, dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) and western bittercress (Cardamine oligosperma)were also documented. Table 1. Plant Community A Botanical Name Common Name Cover(%) Shrubs: Rubus discolor** Himalayan blackberry 5 Herbaceous: Agrostis tenuis Colonial bentgrass 40 Dipsacus sylvestris** Teasel 5 Festuca arundinacea Tall fescue 60 Geranium molle Dovesfoot cranesbill 2 % Cover by Natives 0% %Tree Canopy 0% %Invasive/Noxious 10% *Native Species, **Invasive Species Plant Community B (850 sq. ft.) includes only invasive, non-native species north and northeast of the parking lot. Himalayan blackberry dominates, though teasel was noted in a few locations. There is the potential for the presence of a few native roses or willow in the immediate vicinity of the wetland but their presence would certainly be less than 5 percent total cover. Tall fescue and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) are also present,but again at much less 5 percent cover. This community lacks native plants and has very little tree canopy and is therefore in degraded condition. The tree canopy is from willow trees in the wetland, as there are none in the on-site Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. NRA for Tigard Distribution Center/PHS#4773 Page 3 portion of the vegetated corridor. A portion of this community is unvegetated and includes a dirt and gravel substrate; this area is currently utilized to access a billboard sign near Highway 217. The following table summarizes the species distribution within Plant Community B. Table 2. Plant Community B Botanical Name Common Name Cover (%) Shrubs: Rebus discolor** Himalayan blackberry 100 Herbaceous: Dipsacus sylvestris** Teasel 5 % Cover by Natives 0% %Tree Canopy 20% %Invasive/Noxious 100% *Native Species, **Invasive Species Plant Community C (657 sq. ft.) includes areas of vegetated corridor north and south of the eastern wetland. The northern portion lacks native vegetation, though a few saplings of black cottonwood and Oregon ash, as well as sword fern were documented in the southern portion. The variable tree canopy is generally from trees off-site to the east. The following table summarizes the species distribution within this plant community. Table 3. Plant Community C Botanical Name Common Name Cover (%) Trees: Crataegus tnonogvna English hawthorn 40 Shrubs: Crataegus monogyna English hawthorn 50 Populus trichocarpa* Black cottonwood 10 Rubus discolor** Himalayan blackberry 20 Herbaceous: Festuca arundinacea Rat-tail fescue 10 Holcus lanatus Velvetgrass 50 Polystichum munitum* Sword fern 5 % Cover by Natives 8% %Tree Canopy 20 to 50% °/alnvasive/Noxious 11% *Native Species, **Invasive Species Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. NRA for Tigard Distribution Center/PHS#4773 Page 4 • 4.3 Vegetated Corridor Plant Community Condition The following table summarizes the condition of the plant communities in accordance with Clean Water Services' standards. Table 4. Summary of Plant Community Plant Community Corridor Condition A B C >80%cover of native Good plants, and>50%tree canopy 50%- 80%cover of Marginal native plants,and 26- 20 to 50%tree 50%tree canopy canopy <50%cover of native 0%natives; 0%natives; Degraded plants, and <_ 25%tree 0%tree 20%tree 8%natives canopy canopy canopy The condition of each plant community is determined by the percentages of native species and canopy cover. Despite the presence of a marginal tree canopy in portions of Community C, the overall condition resulting from a near lack of native species justifies a corridor condition of "degraded."Each community is considered to be in "degraded" condition; the result of the presence of few native species and very little tree cover. 5.0 PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project includes the addition of two additional parking lots; one each at the north and south ends of the property, as well as associated modification to existing parking areas. An existing bioswale in the northwest corner of the site will be eliminated and replaced by an underground facility. Figure 4 shows the locations and limits of the new parking areas. As proposed, existing VC will not be impacted by these new parking areas. Though grading is required prior to construction of the north lot, this grading will not impact grades in the VC. Figure 5 shows a preliminary grading plan that confirms that the VC can be avoided to construct the lot. Existing developed areas adjoining vegetated corridors will not be removed; that is, the railroad spur and the existing parking lot will remain. As such, the proposed limits of VC following project development will mirror existing conditions. Though there will be modifications to the existing north parking lot, including removal of the bioswale, the northern limits of the lot will remain unchanged and there are no plans to remove existing asphalt or concrete to facilitate improvement of the new lot. Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. NRA for Tigard Distribution Center/PHS#4773 Page 5 5.1 Vegetated Corridor Enhancement Enhancement of all on-site portions of vegetated corridor will occur prior to, or concurrent with, proposed development. As the current soil substrate is believed to be conducive to the introduction of native plants, the addition of amended soils is not anticipated to be necessary. Enhancement of all regulated VC areas within the site will occur according to Clean Water Services' standards (Appendix A: Planting Requirements of R&O 07-20). This will include removal of the substantial areas of Himalayan blackberry north and east of the northern wetland (Plant Community B), and to a lesser degree in Community C bordering the eastern wetland. A formal landscape plan is being prepared according to R&O 07-20 and will be provided for CWS review and approval at the time of Engineering or City Plan Review. The plan currently specifies the planting of red osier dogwood, swamp rose, snowberry, red alder and Douglas fir. The overall goal will be to restore the corridor to"good" condition, as required by Clean Water Services. Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. NRA for Tigard Distribution Center/PHS#4773 Page 6 Appendix A Figures "PIN". v _jtw' / It . . .• {' •: )11 r te• y , • '.."..‘? �tn�1+� �, '� r���a(0,'�@fit. r.▪�al 1 ru[. .�r« j'�.fr�/�,tH i� _.,.i •r-,�.,."�...',.•�.°�� 'r•wL.• ;it1 s 441 \V\ '14,N.N, 71'?„,\•••/:• 52 110,/,:siPs13 . .L414.,:: L la /___'..°)-11'; : \----w=es', 9.7...„„,„Th - ' ; 53 J;grfif,.," s ri A . - I +. ,_ , '� `,.. 1 -,�. Project Location !,1 � / �"�' --"'D It:T:\\ {� .v r � 3' 4 � .*"'T,...._..b �.`�. t-. ,, t .. � �' .i• � � • y, \' = ' 54 :.°• �... . , . • ;r a' .•; " . ',,... ij , . ••.. • • . "tip. 4 f•:•"•': I% ;�, al ,,,,..,, 7•,..";;-.,__•••••••• --,:p..",,:'-1:"•'-A,..,,'71\ ,..„kili •.. 1„ ..'eV,liti „.41 ,,,4,,,,,‘,114, - . : .: ,„...-r• '1 -,::.: :'.. : ;•....-7,,,,,,14:: w•rI'R I• •f��- " "`'. ems ' ill ; 4 '"" .�Q• }� , \ I a ; _ �. . ' .f �• I! 1• • � mi l ■ f \ _.4F` � r t t ` a 1 \ = `i • � ` f j� x j•- r ' t i�L:�it A s `•t a i ; •` Q.p.'• fi l/ •' . .Ai'' . ,, /// rir„.,_ . ....,a \ , u.,,,,/. . ,1.r,--4 . -1 -"I.\ , -ota.tjs / y 1. .A', _ +j Syr • �. 1,.„, •E �•.. K:xt P\ -,!s 10-^,1/0,F-1-v,,` -"'A-- I '� —')..,,, i•. m j " ~�X f_._ I���Iyl��7��, (} (�.+'tf,� ,, •\G� ; V G .. Olt .,, „ l�. i •�{I:rt;,R.,. .,:..f.• L••4 '.�•"" "'.V..�'{:� _>�", i , ' "�7~ .. �..A_/..)M R`5 ,./,, C, �...w„.t ,{..• _ ._ ' • +• �:ba� f • {'-i... Zi�� ( '�'� • � l,1 .-7 t.1 'SO �`� ,fit . 4R ,. -„,,, , .... ,..• t....-- ---.4, ir„..-._ _ ,... . _ I.F. 1 iii-':;----, ..4.4 /1 r I JF„.�„ .A,�� r rfa •47 t,, ',....,,,.•}. o --! "1••y 9c',7".1".174 �7+ � . 1 r. M C� 1i / A}'. f\r { Pw r i 1•" { fi CJ.F . li �} A Ll 1.1• a • ff .. � -� , ri 1-,' c ,f �I ,-L 1 ,..; r ullr fit jf ,'i _..`•3 W to l_'' �1 r-L_.X rwg.(Ri� .#' 1~ ,. - i�r- • !L. 4. ? 1i— r, r I ��: t.t • _- r' � - ,tea /,-., .L�f1 � �• � I / -. _, '''-1!.'5414',200•,I � `� .I •• ....... 4 3 \� ' �,••'v .s l I ! T £R •. •••ii• E' .`Y fi+ 1 jf. I• , 'v.,z, W� ,, 1,- ur �l` { ,,,r1; 11 • 4/13/11 4773 Location and general topography for the Tigard Distribution Center on Hunziker FIGURE Road in Tigard, Oregon (USGS Beaverton, OR and Lake Oswego, OR ,,, quadrangles, 1961, photorevised 1984). —Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. , GIN v O�'\ EXISTING BUILDING rer 4R-7 I i / /. ,-- I - - _____i i P{ti / -. .... . ... .U S.OF.......... ......... Ill V' WETLAND CONTINUES OFFSITE �i ■ �� / ,,�"-.:, - •r;:::~>,-;: � .. W :'I:AN{ :;: •:::::�:::::. .;`::.:1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR BOUNDARY. . . . . . . . . . . . ... ..;,..;,,;,.;106.01:0•"""--7— = , r.: a �� �_!i®l:®r. i• •'• .'.'.'.'.,: •• • • • .'II• • • • • . 17dAlil►►C.IIJAIlrlsr)111MCI�G\ii0®u®il . . . - . .':l lia=M0 . .•e4%_ . • , . , i @ •- VEGETATED•CORRIDOR TRUNCA DBY EXISTING DEVELOPMENT _ - ' - , {I , is• / / V'� 2'13 L{'.r ���is` il{9 -Au— I - `t ' 11 -r..l '6 i / a ,VEGETATED I - ACM i�: i.. r " " ' — - f / i =°� :y• CORRIDO� _ 11. ,___...._ s: t _ f-• i, a ■,■ • ■,■ ■,■ • M I C:l: . �•' a •m, ii ■i■ n■ i - I ( [ - u •m I■ ■u ■u \1 1 ii ii■ ■ iii iii iii iii / / I• MIN WE NIB f ! „, i is iii i,i iii NM OM iii _ iii iii iii `� , ,/.. ! ` Ii Ell i'ci iii ill iii Eli -' °= —L_ , .1 \\_Th. ��...: a a.v ■■ n■ ■u •■u •n• �i iii ii■ iii I I I _ / \ u n■ :: ■u ■u ■u ■u • ■i■ •n■ •■ •■u i ! O ■ n■ ■u • ■u I /// OQ a •mt _ --• t•-:\ iii.40, i' a / a:k. ! A•..•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii•.•_',1 �` J Irk ..� • —u• I e �� �� fFl ��11� �� �a ifn1: i Lu vt-GeTATEO c ' 'D' 1 ! - a EXISTINGfDEVLOPM ■■■■■■ � _,-s5i' I /_. 3 E / .:;::;:: (tr.. -7 ...." W ' L''...- • / i I U >� ��� r•∎•tea-f∎a-�•••asEN•• f.•-M�-.a-ms•ff••••• --�` — —y -------\). -••••1---EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ' " \. APPROXIMATE> , I _l Q ° a _ PPtOXIMATE -- — -, ✓— l ' VEGETATED ' f 1VETLAND _ WETLAND •% CORRIDOR \: ,. /. o .BOUNDARY —I-.--- �� ONSITE WETLAND EXISTING BUILDING , /, i / • ---4 --•--•••-•-- (2,028 SF/0.05 AC) I .............. ,, \ ONSITE VEGETATED CORRIDOR •" `-•``' (1,672 SF/0.04 AC) 4 ~ 0 40 eo 160 --- SCALE IN FEET 4773 FIGURE 4/11/11 Existing conditions at the Tigard Distribution Center on Hunziker Road in Tigard, Oregon. Base map provided by VLMK Consulting Engineers, 2011 . See Figure 2a for detail of plant communities. 7 •PHS Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. '%AUTOCAD\4700\4773\fig 040511\FIG 2 AND 4\fig aibuilldwg.4/11/2011 4:48:17 PM,Tabloid 1:1 • II LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION TIGARD 120 DAYS = 10/6/2011 FILE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2011-00002 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2011-00010 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (FRE) 2011-00014 FILE TITLE: TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER APPLICANT: VLMK Consulting Engineers OWNER: Tigard Distribution Center LLC Jennifer Kimura c/o Deering Management Group 3993 SW Kelly Ave. 4800 SW Macadam Ave, Suite 120 Portland, OR 97239 Portland,OR 97239 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two existing, multi-tenant,industrial buildings. In addition the applicant is requesting removal of two trees within lightly limited significant habitat area. There is a wetland on an adjacent property near the proposed work area,but no work is proposed within the wetland or vegetated corridor. LOCATION: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road;Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S101BD,Tax Lot 200. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise,glare, odor,and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV COMMENTS WERE SENT: JUNE 15,2011 COMMENTS ARE DUE: JUNE 29,2011 ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ® STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: JULY 14, 2011 1,, COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION 1 VICINITY MAP ❑ BUILDING ELEVATIONS ® ARBORIST'S REPORT ® SITE PLAN ® STORM WATER ANALYSIS ® SIGHT DISTANCE CERT. ® NARRATIVE ® IMPACT STUDY ❑ GEOTECH REPORT STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner (503) 718-2437 P* R * I * D * E DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 Phone: (503) 625-6177 Fax: (503) 625-6179 May 16, 2011 Bill Lambert VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Ave Portland, OR 97239 Re: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker We have reviewed the updated site plan for the modifications to 8001-8005 SW Hunziker in Tigard (sent 5/16 at 11am) The site plan shows 2 enclosures. Both enclosures have adequate space for straight on access. The modifications we discussed in the prior letter have been met and I can approve the enclosures as designed in the following pages that you sent me. I would just like to reiterate the requirements for both enclosures: • The inside measurements of the enclosure must be no less than 20' wide and 10' deep. • The gates will need to allow for the full 20' needed to access the enclosure. They should be hinged in front of the enclosure walls to allow for the full 20' width. This will also allow for the 120 degree opening angle that is required. • The gates need cane bolts and holes put in place for the gates to be locked in the open and closed position allowing for the opening angle needed. • There should be no center post at the access point. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Kristin Leichner Pride Disposal Co. (503) 625-6177 ext: 124 kristinlUpridedisposal.com r (E) CANOPIES TO NEW PICNIC AREA . .. BE REMOVED (20' X 25') (E) DOCK APRON TO • REMOVED AS REQUIRED BE O NEW CONCRETE 0 FOR NEW PARKING LOT FRKL PA 11 ! : 01FTTi 2234 - 1 - - vim 'm La11111m1Lari EL — — • , _A- Millllll n ` - - - -Ii , "` ,,,° Fr - NEW PICNIC AREA 1 1 _- :ANN s.. # II lI II 10' X 25') 11 , J tl �� C , 11 O " 1- - - -119.0'(+/) � II © 7 II J���� O- - .90_0'(+1-) ! F- • 1 JO .,Q`J ,�Q\J'Ail (8) SP. - - i' i ` 08 0or TYP. #5 #6 O , j, e Ilt --111114-_ • v .� 11'-6" / / / 10'-0" jr1'-6/ • x x x x x x x x x "- X x x x x x x x • x x CHAIN LINK FENCE CONCRETE SLAB FLUSH x /WITH SLATS TYP. WITH A.C. PAVING f x 6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB AS SHOWN x 0 0 s x N 1O'-0" CHAIN LINK GATES WITH CANE BOLTS AT CLOSED AND OPEN POSITION DUMPSTERS PER TENANT TYP. RECYCLING x x x x x x x x x x - ` i x x x x x x x x _ GARBAGE ENCLOSURE PLAN G5.0 1/4" = 1'-0 + n 114 41 S TIGARD City of Tigard June 1, 2011 Jennifer Kimura VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Ave. Portland, OR 97239 RE: Completeness Tigard Distribution Center Case File No. SDR2011-00002&TRE2011-00010 Dear Ms. Kimura: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2011-00002) to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two multi-tenant, industrial buildings. The development site is located at 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Property Owner Information. A title report was submitted showing the property owner as The Tigard Distribution Center, LLC. Karl Klokke was listed as the property owner on the application form. Please show the relationship of Mr. Klokke to Tigard Distribution Center as an authorized signer for proposed work to the site. 2. Narrative. Although the site plan shows information, Section 18.390 Decision Making Procedures requires that the relevant criteria be addressed in sufficient detail for review and action. Please revise the narrative to address/expand upon the following criteria: ♦ 18.360—Site Development Review. Section 18.360.090 includes the approval criteria for Site Development Review. Please address these criteria stating how each is met or not applicable to the proposal. ♦ 18.745—Landscaping and Screening. Section 18.745.040 —The site plan shows the proposed street trees. How are the street tree spacing standards under 18.745.040.0 met? Section 18.745.050 — How will the parking and new/revised refuse collection areas be screened in accordance with 18.745.050.B.5 and 050.E.1 &4? • 18.755 — Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. How are the requirements of 18.755.050 B—D satisfied? 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov • 18.765 — Off-Street Parking and Loading. Please address the criteria for bicycle parking under 18.765.050 and provide calculations that show how the maximum parking standards are not exceeded. ♦ 18.790 —Tree Removal. It appears there are two trees (defined as 6" or greater) to be removed within sensitive lands (Significant Habitat Area). Two tree removal permits are required. Please address the tree removal criteria found under 18.790.050(A) in relation to each tree. One permit fee was submitted. Please submit a second permit fee for the second tree ($294.00). 3. What does keynote 20 identify on the site plan (G1.0)? 4. Attached please find comments regarding street trees, tree removal/mitigation, and parking lot trees from the City Arborist, Todd Prager. The issues under 18.390 have been resolved. All other comments are not completeness items, but should be noted by the applicant as issues that must be addressed. Please provide 3 copies of each revised document. If re-submitting individual pages/sheets you will need to replace them in the existing packets previously submitted. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-718-2437. Sincerely, C 4 t,t./d C du -) Cheryl Gaines Associate Planner c: SDR2011-00002 Land Use File Tigard Distribution Center Completeness Item Met Not Met N/A Comments 18.745.040: X It appears there is space for at least two Street Trees additional street trees along the eastern portion of the street frontage. 18.745.050: X There are several locations where Buffering and parking lot trees(Imperial Honeylocust) Screening do not meet the"one tree for every seven parking spaces" standard. Spacing of parking lot trees within the front,middle, and back parking lots needs to be reduced so there is at least one parking lot tree for every 7th parking space. 18.790.030: X -There is not site plan accompanying the Tree Plan April 26, 2011 arborist report. This will Requirement need to be provided. Tree numbers in the report need to be cross referenced in the site plan. -The inventory in the April 26, 2011 arborist report only identifies 14 trees although earlier in the report there is reference to 27 trees. All trees 6" and greater on site are required to be inventoried and included as part of the tree plan. -No mitigation calculations or proposal have been provided by the project arborist. All trees 12" and greater on site are subject to mitigation requirements. Depending on the percentage of trees 12"and greater retained,various percentages of mitigation of the total number of inches removed are required according to the formulas in 18.790.030.C. -The mitigation trees need to be clearly identified in the site plan. Trees required by other code provisions(street trees,parking lot trees,wetland buffer trees,etc.)are not eligible for credit towards mitigation requirements. 18.790.050: Without locating the trees on the site Permit Applicability plan, I cannot determine whether tree removal permit requirements apply. Todd Prager Associate Planner/Arborist May 25,2011 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: SDR2011-00002 Tigard Distr. COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: May 31, 2011 GRADING ❑ Existing and proposed contours shown. ❑ Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? ❑ Adjacent parcel grades shown. ❑ Geotech study submitted? STREET ISSUES ❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. ❑ Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ❑ Street name(s) shown. ❑ Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. ❑ Street profiles shown. ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report ❑ Street grades compliant? ❑ Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width appropriate? ❑ Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines shown. ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines shown? ❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? ❑ Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? PFI permit is required for any vegetated corridor plantings and maintenance plan. Work must be bonded. PFI permit will include the water quality and detention facilities. Bond for the work and payment of fees required before permit issuance. ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? ❑ Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? REVISED: 05/31/11 The submittal is hereby deemed ® COMPLETE El INCOMPLETE By: Q lr�.Y.,� P b��a-�--z- Date: May 31, 2011 REVISED: 05/31/11 Todd Prager From: Todd Prager Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 9:11 AM To: 'Bill Lambert'; Cheryl Caines Cc: Erin Holsonback Subject: RE: TDC - Parking (Scanned from MFP-05863210 05/27/2011 13:51) Hello all, I have re-reviewed the landscape plan (sheet L1.0) and now see the 60" of mitigation trees (not otherwise required as street trees, parking lot trees, etc.). Also, I think we can assume the arborist approved of the mitigation calculations based on the note he provided on 5-9-2011 (approving of the overall site plan). That should take care of my comments on the tree plan requirements in 18.790. Thanks, Todd From: Bill Lambert [mailto:billl @vlmk.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 5:27 AM To: Cheryl Caines Cc: Erin Holsonback; Todd Prager Subject: TDC - Parking (Scanned from MFP-05863210 05/27/2011 13:51) Cheryl, Good morning. I talked with Erin yesterday and as you can see by her emails below, we are not sure if this issue with the mitigation trees (see below) is clearly understood. It needs to get resolved so we can be deemed complete. Please let me know the following: 1) Is the mitigation table on sheet L1.0 all you need for calculations? 2) Do you require this table to be a part of the arborist report? If so, I will make a copy of it and put it in his report. The arborist is very hard to reach and schedule any paperwork with because he is always out in the field. I don't have the time to wait for him to do his own calcs. 3) Do you understand Erin's comments below about which trees are counted toward mitigation and the fact that the owner has agreed to pay the fee-in-lieu for the additional inches required? 4) What else is required from us to resolve this issue? Revised Drawings, Copies of arborist report with added mitigation table, other? 5) There are (4) items on Todd's list under Tree Plan a. Items 1 and 2 are not applicable, as you stated. b. Item 3 (mitigation report)...this should be as notes above (number 2) c. item 4 (Mitigation trees on plan), this is shown on the landscape plan (sheet L1.0) with an asterisk in the plant list. Do you need something else? I appreciate your help with this. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate 1 VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 ( F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billI vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com From: Erin Holsonback [mailto:erin @ottenla.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 4:01 PM To: Bill Lambert Subject: Fwd: Re: FW: TDC - Parking (Scanned from MFP-05863210 05/27/2011 13:51) Bill, There are also two flowering "accent" trees in front of the office on the West side of the building that I'm also counting as mitigation trees. Thanks, Erin Original Message Subject:Re: FW: TDC - Parking (Scanned from MFP-05863210 05/27/2011 13:51) Date:Tue, 31 May 2011 15:50:15 -0700 From:Erin Holsonback <erin @ottenla.com> To:Bill Lambert<billl @vlmk.com> Bill, The only trees that I've counted towards mitigation are the evergreen trees and the three trees in between the buildings. None of these mitigation trees counted are "required" trees as Cheryl mentioned, street trees and parking lot trees were not included in these numbers. I'm not sure why she thinks that I've included these in the mitigation calculations. Erin On 5/31/2011 3:38 PM, Bill Lambert wrote: Cheryl, Thank you for checking on this for me. I will discuss this with Erin, but I think she took all this into account and it is my understanding that we will also be paying a fee-in-lieu-of for some of the mitigation.After talking with Erin, I will discuss the mitigation with the arborist and see if we can include it as part of his report. Do you need a formal written response to this letter from Todd or just return the revised report and revised landscape plan (if needed)? Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billft vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com 2 From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylctigard-or.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 3:33 PM To: Bill Lambert Cc: Todd Prager Subject: RE: FW: TDC - Parking (Scanned from MFP-05863210 05/27/2011 13:51) Bill, Todd and I have discussed his comments in light of your e-mails below. Thanks for pointing out the tree numbers, it was difficult to see them. With the trees being numbered,the first comment under Tree Plan Requirement is no longer applicable. The second is also no longer applicable since it is now understood that the 14 other trees are off-site (Clear Channel property). The code requires the mitigation calcs to be part of the tree report, which is to be prepared by the certified arborist. I see that Erin prepared a mitigation schedule, however, this schedule is counting trees required by other sections of the code (landscaping, street trees, etc.)as mitigation trees. This is not permitted under 18.790.030. Looking at the plan, are there some trees 12" or greater that can be or are worth saving that could decrease the mitigation amount? Also is there a way to plant more trees than is minimally required by the landscaping code on your site (open area to the NE, along the spur, or the area between buildings A& B), and possibly Clear Channels site that would decrease the mitigation amount? Just trying to think about some options to decrease the mitigation requirement. As for the rest of the packet, I'm looking at all the other items today and should have you a letter tomorrow. Cheryl From: Bill Lambert [mailto:billk vlmk.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 12:52 PM To: Cheryl Gaines Subject: FW: FW: TDC- Parking (Scanned from MFP-05863210 05/27/2011 13:51) Cheryl, Here is the response from Erin, our landscape architect on the email I sent you this morning. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl@ivlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com From: Erin Holsonback [mailto:erin @ottenla.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 12:48 PM To: Bill Lambert Subject: Re: FW: TDC - Parking (Scanned from MFP-05863210 05/27/2011 13:51) Bill, In response to the first two items on this list...the reason for the missing street trees are the gas line, the utility easement and vision clearance for their sign. There are a total of 156 parking spaces, which requires 22 trees. I have specified 20 new parking lot trees and there are three existing to remain. There are a couple of areas 3 where the trees are not distributed accordingly, so if they want me to shift the locations, I can. At this time, however, we have more trees than required in the parking lot. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Erin On 5/31/2011 6:21 AM, Bill Lambert wrote: Cheryl, Good morning. I hope you had a great holiday weekend. I read the city arborist's letter and I am a little confused. Please note: 1) All of the trees in the arborist's report are numbered on my site plan (G1.0) . Is there something else required or did Todd Prager not get the site plan? 2) Reading the requirements in the pre-application notes, I thought we were only required to locate trees that were 12" or greater. . .not 6". Regardless, we have located all the trees (including down to 4") on my site plan (G1.0) and indicated which ones get removed and which ones get saved. Something else required? 3) In the arborist's report, he lists (27) trees, but he also notes that (13) of them are off-site and will not be a part of the report. . .did Todd miss that? 4) The mitigation calcs/requirements are on the landscape plan (L1.0) . Did Todd not get a copy of the landscape plan? Is there something else required? In order to get completeness, please let me know what you need from me. I assume the missing items (street trees, buffering) can be done as part of the SDR review, but are not completeness items? Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Bill G. Lambert 1 Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl @vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com Original Message From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 2:20 PM To: Bill Lambert Subject: FW: Scanned from MFP-05863210 05/27/2011 13:51 Bill, Attached are the City Arborist incomplete items for the Tigard Distribution Center. I think the items under Tree Plan are items that need to be addressed as part of completeness. It will be tough to review the plan if we don't know which trees on the plan correspond with the Arborist Report. I haven't finished my review, nor have I received anything from Gus. Have a good weekend. Cheryl 4 DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271. 1. 1/3657 - Release Date: 05/24/11 06:35:00 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271. 1.1/3671 - Release Date: 05/31/11 06:34:00 5 503.222.4453 CONSULTING 503.248.9263 E N G I N E E R S vlmk @vimk.com www.vimk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 Completeness Checksheet Response Case File #: SDR-00002 & TRE2011-00010 Date: 6-06-11 Customer name and phone number: VLMK Engineers (Bill Lambert) (503) 222-4453 Reviewer's Name: Cheryl Caines Date of checksheet: 6-01-11 Checksheet Description Compliance item number 1 Property owner See attached copy of email from owner for explanation 2 Narrative See attached copy of revised Narrative with each of the additional items addressed 3 Keynote 20 This item was incorrect and should be noted as keynote 12 4 City Arborist plan review: 18.745.040 (Street Trees) This is not a completeness item and will be addressed as part of the Site Design Review 18.745.050 (Buffering and Screening) This is not a completeness item and will be addressed as part of the Site Design Review 18.790.030 (Tree Plan Requirement) These items have been discussed with the city and have been resolved 18.790.050 (Permit Applicability) This is not a completeness item and will be addressed as part of the Site Design Review G:\Acad2010\210498\01 Site Design Review\Checksheet-1.Doc Structural Engineering•Civil Engineering• Industrial Engineering•Planning•Studies/Evaluations•Entitlement Bill Lambert From: Jennifer Kimura Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 2:56 PM To: Bill Lambert Subject: Fwd: Tigard Distribution Center Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Karl Klokke <karlklokke @gmail.com> Date: June 4, 2011 11:52:36 AM PDT To: Jennifer Kimura<ienniferk @vlmk.com> Subject: RE: Tigard Distribution Center Tigard Distribution Center LLC is an Oregon LLC and Klokke Corporation is the only member of the Tigard Distribution Center LLC. Klokke Corporation owns Tigard Distribution Center LLC and several other LLCs. I am the president of the Klokke Corporation and have signature authority for the Klokke Corporation and the Tigard Distribution Center LLC. Walt Rivers with Deering Management Group acts as our registered agent sense he is our property manager and a resident of Oregon. From: Jennifer Kimura [mailto:jenniferk @vlmk.comj Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 2:37 PM To: karlklokke(agmail.com Cc: Bill Lambert Subject: Tigard Distribution Center Hi Karl, Please provide an explanation of your relationship to Tigard Distribution Center, LLC. In particular, the City would like to confirm that you are an authorized signer for Tigard Distribution Center, LLC. The City of Tigard is requesting clarification on this because the Title Report submitted lists Tigard Distribution Center, LLC as the owner, and the applications have been signed by you. We are hoping to submit all the required completeness items to the City of Tigard on Monday, June 6h. i • T I GARD` City of f Tigard June 1,2011 Jennifer Kimura VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Ave. Portland, OR 97239 RE: Completeness Tigard Distribution Center Case File No. SDR2011-00002&TRE2011-00010 Dear Ms. Kimura: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2011-00002) to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two multi-tenant, industrial buildings. The development site is located at 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Property Owner Information. A title report was submitted showing the property owner as The Tigard Distribution Center, LLC. Karl Klokke was listed as the property owner on the application form. Please show the relationship of Mr. Klokke to Tigard Distribution Center as an authorized signer for proposed work to the site. 2. Narrative. Although the site plan shows information, Section 18.390 Decision Making Procedures requires that the relevant criteria be addressed in sufficient detail for review and action. Please revise the narrative to address/expand upon the following criteria: • 18.360—Site Development Review. Section 18.360.090 includes the approval criteria for Site Development Review. Please address these criteria stating how each is met or not applicable to the proposal. ♦ 18.745—Landscaping and Screening. Section 18.745.040 —The site plan shows the proposed street trees. How are the street tree spacing standards under 18.745.040.0 met? Section 18.745.050 — How will the parking and new/revised refuse collection areas be screened in accordance with 18.745.050.13.5 and 050.E.1 & 4? • --1$.755 -- Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. How are the requirements of 18.755.050 B—D satisfied? 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov ♦ 18.765 — Off-Street Parking and Loading. Please address the criteria for bicycle parking under 18.765.050 and provide calculations that show how the maximum parking standards are not exceeded. ♦ 18.790 —Tree Removal. It appears there are two trees (defined as 6" or greater) to be removed within sensitive lands (Significant Habitat Area). Two tree removal permits are required. Please address the tree removal criteria found under 18.790.050(A) in relation to each tree. One permit fee was submitted. Please submit a second permit fee for the second tree ($294.00). 3. What does keynote 20 identify on the site plan (G1.0)? 4. Attached please find comments regarding street trees, tree removal/mitigation, and parking lot trees from the City Atborist, Todd Prager. The issues under 18.390 have been resolved. All other comments are not completeness items, but should be noted by the applicant as issues that must be addressed. Please provide 3 copies of each revised document. If re-submitting individual pages/sheets you will need to replace them in the existing packets previously submitted. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-718-2437. Sincerely, Cod .a-J Cheryl Gaines Associate Planner c: SDR2011-00002 Land Use File Tigard Distribution Center Completeness Item Met Not Met N/A Comments 18.745.040: X It appears there is space for at least two Street Trees additional street trees along the eastern portion of the street frontage. 18.745.050: X There are several locations where Buffering and parking lot trees(Imperial Honeylocust) Screening do not meet the"one tree for every seven parking spaces" standard. Spacing of parking lot trees within the front,middle, and back parking lots needs to be reduced so there is at least one parking lot tree for every 7th parking space. 18.790.030: X -There is not site plan accompanying the Tree Plan April 26, 2011 arborist report. This will Requirement need to be provided. Tree numbers in the report need to be cross referenced in the site plan. -The inventory in the April 26, 2011 arborist report only identifies 14 trees although earlier in the report there is reference to 27 trees. All trees 6" and greater on site are required to be inventoried and included as part of the tree plan. -No mitigation calculations or proposal have been provided by the project arborist. All trees 12"and greater on site are subject to mitigation requirements. Depending on the percentage of trees 12"and greater retained, various percentages of mitigation of the total number of inches removed are required according to the formulas in 18.790.030.C. -The mitigation trees need to be clearly identified in the site plan. Trees required by other code provisions (street trees,parking lot trees, wetland buffer trees,etc.)are not eligible for credit towards mitigation requirements. 18.790.050: Without locating the trees on the site Permit Applicability I plan,I cannot determine whether tree removal permit requirements apply. Todd Prager Associate Planner/Arborist May 25, 2011 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: DR2011-00002 Tigard Distr. ' COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: May 31, 2011 GRADING H Existing and proposed contours shown. _ — ------------- ] Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? fl Adjacent parcel grades shown. (� Geotech study submitted? STREET ISSUES Right-of-way clearly shown. Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. I I Street name(s) shown. Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. n Street profiles shown. (-I Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report I I Street grades compliant? ❑ Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width appropriate? Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES I Existing/proposed lines shown. ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? I I Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES I ► T Existing/proposed lines shown? I Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? ® Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? PFI permit is required for any vegetated corridor plantings and maintenance plan. Work must be bonded. PFI permit will include the water quality and detention facilities. Bond for the work and payment of fees required before permit issuance. ❑ Area for faacilify mafdh requirerne itifrom calcs?--- ❑ Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? I I Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? REVISED: 05/31/11 Thesubmittal is hereby deeme( ® COMPLETE ❑ IK MIPLETE By: Q P bDate: May 31, 2011 REVISED: 05/31/11 Bill Lambert From: Cheryl Caines [cherylc@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 11:27 AM To: Bill Lambert; Jennifer Kimura Subject: Tigard Distribution Center Attachments: TDC incomplete Itr.pdf; 500' Property Owner Mailing Labels Request.doc Bill and Jennifer, Attached please find the incomplete letter for Tigard Distribution Center. Most issues have to do with the narrative. Once these issues are resolved, I'll request additional copies of the final submittal package and 2 sets of self- addressed, stamped envelopes. Since most of the package items don't need to be revised,you can probably go ahead and start on the copies for those items that are not being revised. I'll need the following: • Submit 6 copies of complete application packets. This includes plans and all application materials that have been submitted to the City. If items have been revised, please only include the revised version. ♦ Submit 8 additional copies of the final plan sets. These may be reduced copies (11" x 17") provided they are legible. One set must be 8.5" x 11". ♦ Submit two sets of pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes. Property owner list must be produced by Patty Lunsford in the Planning Department, 503-718-2438. I have included a copy of the request form for your convenience. Please leave the return address blank and use stamps instead of pre-paid postage. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheryl DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules"City General Records Retention Schedule." 1 • Cheryl Caines From: Cheryl Caines Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 2:32 PM To: 'Bill Lambert' Cc: Jennifer Kimura Subject: RE: Tigard Distribution Center Bill, I took a quick look at the revised narrative and other materials you sent over. It is okay to go ahead and make the copies. It seems like all the issues are addressed. There could always be follow-up questions that come out of the review, but that is typical. It is okay to send it over by courier. I'll let the Permit Techs know it will be in the next couple of days. Could you please include 3 additional copies of the revised narrative to put in the 3 packets we already have on-file? Thanks, Cheryl From: Bill Lambert [mailto:billl @vlmk.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 1:28 PM To: Cheryl Caines Cc: Jennifer Kimura Subject: RE: Tigard Distribution Center Cheryl, Good afternoon. I wanted to touch base with you and see if you could let me know about a couple items: 1) I sent you the Narrative and response letter and wanted to make sure it was okay before we re-submit all the copies. If you are too busy to get to it, perhaps it would be better to just submit the package and wait for the review...please advise. 2) When we get all of the package together and ready to bring in, is it okay to have it delivered (Rose City) or do we need to be there?We are getting very busy ourselves and just need to schedule the out of office activities. Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR I 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl©vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com From: Bill Lambert Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 6:49 AM To: 'Cheryl Caines' Cc: Jennifer Kimura Subject: RE: Tigard Distribution Center Cheryl, As promised, see attached written response to your completeness review letter. Please let me know if this response and the Narrative are okay and we will make the copies requested and get them to the city tomorrow. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl @vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com From: Bill Lambert Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 3:59 PM To: 'Cheryl Caines' Cc: Jennifer Kimura Subject: RE: Tigard Distribution Center Cheryl, I am about to leave for today and I will get you a written response to your letter on Monday, but I have finished the Narrative and attached it here for your review. If it is acceptable, please let me know and we will get all the items/copies back to you next week. I really appreciate your help. Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl @vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc @ tgard-or.gov] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 3:29 PM To: Bill Lambert Subject: RE: Tigard Distribution Center Sorry, the maximum parking is separate from the bicycle standards. In Table 18.765.2—the max, min and bicycle space requirements are listed. Just like the minimum parking standard was calculated, please also show how the maximum is not exceeded. The site is in within the A parking zone since it is adjacent to a transit route. I went through the narrative but did not see section 18.790. On what page is it? Cheryl From: Bill Lambert [mailto:billl @vlmk.com] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 3:12 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: RE: Tigard Distribution Center 2 Sorry Cheryl...another question...I do not understand what you are asking for in the tree removal part of your letter. You request that I respond to 18.790(A) (which I did)...in relation to EACH tree?The (2) trees being removed are right next to each other. Should I duplicate my section 18.790(A) in the Narrative? Also..keynote 20 on sheet G1.0 is a typo...it should be keynote 12 (large recycling containers). Thank you for your time. Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl @vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com From: Bill Lambert Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 3:00 PM To: 'Cheryl Caines' Subject: RE: Tigard Distribution Center Question...I see your requirement for responding to 18.765.050(Bicycle parking). You are asking me to show how the maximum parking standards are not exceeded. I do not see any maximum requirements for bicycle parking.Am I missing something? Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 bill)@vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc©tigard-or.gov] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 12:24 PM To: Bill Lambert Subject: RE: Tigard Distribution Center Bill, The application will be deemed complete after the envelopes/copies are received. If you send over the narrative next week, I'll take a look and let you know whether to make the copies of that. Then all items can be re-submitted as one package. Cheryl From: Bill Lambert [mailto:billl @vlmk.com] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 11:43 AM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: RE: Tigard Distribution Center Cheryl, Jennifer and I were just discussing the issue of"completeness" items versus SDR review items. It is my understanding that if we provide the ownership information and revised Narrative to you (via PDF email), that will cover the "completeness" items and we can make the copies of drawings as requested and submit them to the city next week to continue with the SDR review. 3 I would think after you get the Narrative,you should be able to deem us complete...ls that correct? Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl(avlmk.com ( http://www.vlmk.com From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 1:39 PM To: Bill Lambert Subject: RE: Tigard Distribution Center Bill, You don't need to directly respond to Todd's comments since the 18.790 ones were resolved or can be resolved by my requests for the narrative (item #4—yes I meant 18.790). The other issues will be addressed as part of the review. Finally, yes Gus does not need anything further for his review. Cheryl From: Bill Lambert [mailto:billl @vlmk.com] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 12:24 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: RE: Tigard Distribution Center Cheryl, Good afternoon. After looking at this, I am wondering how to respond to Todd's list? Should I address (in writing) every item on the list, even those that are not completeness items, or simply state that item 4 in your letter is resolved and we will address the other items with the final SDR review? Also, I assume you are referring to section 18.790 in your item 4...not 18.390?And it appears that Gus's list is deemed complete and I do not need to address anything...correct? Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billlCa)vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc @ tigard-or.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 11:27 AM To: Bill Lambert; Jennifer Kimura Subject: Tigard Distribution Center Bill and Jennifer, 4 . a Attached please find the incomplete letter for Tigard Distribution Center. Most issues have to do with the narrative. Once these issues are resolved, I'll request additional copies of the final submittal package and 2 sets of self- addressed, stamped envelopes. Since most of the package items don't need to be revised,you can probably go ahead and start on the copies for those items that are not being revised. I'll need the following: • Submit 6 copies of complete application packets. This includes plans and all application materials that have been submitted to the City. If items have been revised,please only include the revised version. ♦ Submit 8 additional copies of the final plan sets. These may be reduced copies (11" x 17") provided they are legible. One set must be 8.5" x 11". ♦ Submit two sets of pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes. Property owner list must be produced by Patty Lunsford in the Planning Department, 503-718-2438. I have included a copy of the request form for your convenience. Please leave the return address blank and use stamps instead of pre-paid postage. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheryl DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules"City General Records Retention Schedule." 5 1 CONSULTING RECEIVED ' 503.222.4453 \' I11I( ENGINEERS 503.248.9263 JUN 0 8 2011 vimk @vimk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4314 www.vlmk.com CITY Or TIGARD LETTER OF TRAIUMITTAURING TO: City of Tigard DATE: 6-8-11 13125 SW Hall Blvd - Planning Desk PROJECT: TDC Tigard, Oregon 97223 SDR-00002 &TRE2011-00010 ATTN: Cheryl Caines JOB NO: 210498 WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via: Delivery the following items: ❑ Drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Application for Payment ❑ Change order ❑ Specifications ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Samples ❑ Copies Date No. Description (6) Complete Packets, including plans & revised narratives (7) Half scale sets + (1) 8-1/2 x 11 (2) Sets of pre-stamped/addressed envelopes (3) Extra Narratives (1) Response to Incompleteness Letter / / (1) Check - Tree Permit - $294.00 �/ 77/N1�1 l \� � -Ctii THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: (..,01.1;Cc, V l \C4— ❑ For approval ❑ Reviewed ❑ Submit additional copies for distri tion ❑ For your use ❑ Rejected ❑ Resubmit copies for review ❑ As requested ❑ Revise and Resubmit ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ Make Corrections As Noted ❑ Prints returned after loan to us ❑ For Bids Due ❑ (Other) REMARKS Copy To: File Signed: Jennifer Kimura File: Document2 Page 1 of 1 Printed: June 07,2011 i LAND USE APPLICi :ION Project:1∎ •d D;sa. C..4-/-. 5D2.2 011 - b000a Date: 4 - I - 1 I COMPLETENESS REVIEW D' COMPLETE [ ] INCOMPLETE STANDARD INFORMATION: ❑ DeedlTitle/Proof of Ownership Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits,Minutes,List of Attendees Impact Study (18.390) [.� USA Service Provider Letter ❑ Construction Cost Estimate ❑ Envelopes with Postage(Verify Count) ❑ #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans- "Paper Copies" [" Pre-Application Conference Notes ❑ #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans-"CD's" PROJECT STATISTICS: ❑ print Size g7%of Landscaping On Site Q--- %of Building Impervious Surface On Site Lot Square Footage PLANS DIMENSIONED: ❑--Bth t rint Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking)❑ Truck Loading Space Where Applicable ❑ -{krrttritl-Heiglt1 [70--- Access Approach and Aisle 0- Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDI NAL PLANS: inity Map Tree Inventory Etitisting Conditions Plan Landscape Plan e Pian [g."---Lighting Plan TREE PLAN 1 MITIGATION PLAN: ❑ i de n-Iii-Pc"-ii try/ ❑ f r1 JJ C1 S?7 ❑ re,,•lova/ ❑ enifi1 ex-cic✓J ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) 1 (r )4414vral 12coAuit, PJ.scu-e.,f CY Arbey-.c-'- Rep or Q' S•1-oennr,a al. 0aI c.J El R' 5:,h+ ___D}S-f-anGA- ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.340(Directors interpretation) ❑ 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ❑ 18.780(Signs) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ❑ 18.790(Tree Removal) ❑ 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) . ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(ManufacturedlMobil Home Regulations) ❑ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: • d e.t•ci -- a 1.14V-- 4'.. +C DG -to KQ.1 K 1 O k .t. I:\curpin\masters\forms-revised\land use application completeness review dot REVISED: 6-Jun-07 , III . N T I GA$D• City of Tigard June 14,2011 Jennifer Kimura VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Ave. Portland, OR 97239 RE: Completeness Tigard Distribution Center Case File No. SDR2011-00002 &TRE2011-00010 Dear Ms. Kimura: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2011-00002) to expand and revise the vehicle parking areas for two multi-tenant, industrial buildings. The development site is located at 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that your application was complete as of June 8, 2011 for the purpose of beginning the 120-day review period for a final decision. The formal comment and review process typically takes 4 to 6 weeks. It should be noted that staff has not reviewed the application submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria, and that additional items may arise during the application review which may require further clarification. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-718- 2437. Sincerely, Cheryl Caines Associate Planner c: SDR2011-00002 Land Use File 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES IP CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ' (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) TIGARD PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: 1-11-11 STAFF AT PRE-APP.: C.Canes,G.Duenas NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT:VLMK Consulting Engineers AGENT: Jennifer Kimura Phone: (503) 222-4453 Phone: 4 ) - PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 8001 —8005 SW Hunziker Road TAX MAPS)/LOT#(S): 2S101 BD00200 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Site Development Review (SDR) Variance (VAR) for landscaping less than required minimum (15%). PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Revise existing parking lots and add new parking. Remodel south elevation of building B. - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Light Industrial ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: I-L ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.530) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: none sq. ft. Average Min.lot width: 50 ft. Max.building height: 45 ft. Setbacks: Front: 30 ft. Side: 0/50 ft. Rear:0/50 ft. Corner: 20ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 85%.Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 15%. ® NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES,AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. ® NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Z IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address,at a minimum, the transportation system,including bikeways, the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each pubic facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the condusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ® ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses:1/2. Minimum access width:50'/30' Minimum pavement width:40'/24'. All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: ® WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet,along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.B.) BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS -Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: • A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. ® BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences,utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: parking screened from view (18.745.050.E). CITY OF TTGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ® LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms,decorative walls,and raised planters. ® RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SHE L SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at (503) 625-6177. ® PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: WHSE- 0.5/1,000 sf; MFG- 1.6/1,000 sf; OFF - 2.7/1,000 sf. Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):147 spaces total. SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50%OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet,6 inches. ▪ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: • All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ® LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. ® BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Industrial-0.1/1,000 sf;Office -0.5/1,000 sf. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. I STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. ® CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&0 07-20/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA' CORRIDOR PER SIDES • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% I 10 to<50 acres 15 feet I >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands<0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands>0.5 acre <25% 50 feet ♦ Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 10 to<50 acres 30 feet >50 to<100 acres 50 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25- ♦ Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in<25%slope), • Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravine° 'Starting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow)for streams/rivers,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. &The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Restrictions in the Vegetate • NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership,such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. ® TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Plan Requirements Handout" included in your pre-application conference packet) A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING,REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. PROTECTION IS PREFERRED OVER REMOVAL WHEREVER POSSIBLE (Address all items in the City's Tree Plan Requirements Handout). THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D.of no net loss of trees; I Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75%of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50%of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75%or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed;and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • ®' MITIGATION (Refer to (. de Section 18.790.060.E.) REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: • A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. • If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: I The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city,either public property or, with the consent of the owner,private property. • The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director,elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. ® CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH,unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ® 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.640(Durham Quarry Design Standards) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ® 18.360(Site Development Review) ® 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ® 18.780(Signs) ® 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ® 18.790(Tree Removal) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ® 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ® 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ® 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ® 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 1 8.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ® 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ® 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ® 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recyding Storage) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS C ;OMMENTS: A Site Development Review is required because the percentage of landscaping is being reduced by more than 10% and possibly below the 15% requirement within the I-L zone. Gravel areas do not count toward minimum landscaping. Can some of these gravel areas be replanted? If minimum landscaping standards cannot be satisfied,the applicant may request a variance. This request is not guaranteed. Parking lot trees are not shown at the minimum spacing of 1 tree for every 7 parking spaces. The trees must provide a canopy effect. Are there areas where larger trees can be planted - such as the areas adjacent to the parking areas and larger landscape islands? These will provide greater canopy coverage. It is unknown if the minimum parking requirement is met for the development and mix of uses. The applicant should verify whether minimum standards are met. Details on each use (classification and square footage) and the parking requirement for each use must be provided. If minimums cannot be met,then the applicant must request an adjustment or variance to the parking standards. Screening of the parking lot is required (see I8.745.050.E). Fees for each application can be found on the fee schedule included in the Pre-application packet. PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One,81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Hearings Officer. A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Division will not be grant ntil there is compliance with all cond s of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building .,ivision. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: Gary Pagenstecher.Associate Planner CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION e)114 PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-624-3681 DIRECT: 503-718-2437 EMAIL: cherylc @tigard-or.gov TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVF.I.OPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.tigard-or.gov H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 16-May-08 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ENGINEERING SECTION City of Tigard,Oregon Community(Development Shaping Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Maids): 2S101B000200 Tigard DC Tax Lot[sl: 200 Use Type: IL The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Hunziker Street to 37 _ feet from centerline of right-of-way SW to feet SW to feet 1 1 SW to feet Street improvements: Xj Partial- street improvements will be necessary along SW Hunziker Street , to include: feet of pavement from centerline of right-of-way concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities 8-foot concrete sidewalk 5-foot planter adjacent to curb ® street trees 1 1 street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section I I Other: Street improvements may be necessary along to include: I 1 feet of pavement concrete curb I I storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: I I feet of pavement concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities 1 -foot concrete sidewalk I I street trees I I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. I I Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement I I concrete curb I 1 storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk I J street trees I I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: I I feet of pavement concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities I I -foot concrete sidewalk I I street trees CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section • [ I street signs, traffic 'ntrol devices, streetlights and a twr ,ar streetlight fee. Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: 7 Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, if approved by the City Engineer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is approved, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. Place the overhead utilities underground. Sanitary Sewers: N/A Water Supply: The City of Tigard is the water service provider in this area. Please contact John Goodrich at 503-718- 2609 to coordinate water connection requirements. N/A Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: John Dalby, (503) 356-4723] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Water service to meet fire protection requirements will be coordinated with the City of Tigard. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section Storm water detention is req 1. Comply with Clean Water Servie 'CWS) Resolution and Order No. 07-20 4.03.4b to meet detest,..., requirements. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Resolution and Order No. 07-20, which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in- lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof. Please contact the Building Division for the current fee. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: X Construction of an on-site water quality facility. Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. Other requirements are: 1. The applicant proposes to replace the existing water quality swale with storm filter vaults. The water quality and detention requirements include both the existing impervious area and the additional impervious area to be added. Comply with CWS 4.05.5b. 2. Submit water quality and detention calculations to the Development Engineer, City of Tigard, for review and approval. 3. The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for future maintenance of water quality and detention facilities. This agreement will be recorded with Washington County and the facilities will be inspected periodically by the City for compliance with the terms of the agreement. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) which was replaced in 2008 by a Transportation Development Tax (TDT) that became effective 7/1/09. The TDT program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TDT incorporates the proposed use of the land and the size of the project. The TDT is calculated, due, and payable at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances payment of the TDT may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TDT exceeds the TDT rate for a single- family home. No additional building area, hence no TDT. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. 1. Submit water quality and detention calculations to the City. 2. Provide water quality and detention maintenance plan with the PFI permit submittal. 3. Enter into a water quality and detention facility maintenance agreement with the City on City forms after substantial completion of the project, but before final occupancy is issued. This agreement will be recorded and City will monitor the facilities in the future for compliance with the terms of the agreement. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Master Permit 'ST). This permit is issued for all Ile and multi-family buildings. It covers all work nece_ _ary for building construction, inclu j sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: a P- D/i 1 Deo ment Engineer DATE Phone: [503)118-2410 Fax: [503)118-2148 template, Revised: March 4,2010 CITY OF TIMARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section V L M K ENGINEERS CONSULTING ' 45 42 503.2 .9253 503.248.9263 vlmk@vlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 www.vlmk.com Tigard Distribution Center Design Narrative December 10, 2010 Project Narrative for Minor Modification submittal City of Tigard, Oregon Project: Tigard Distribution Center Location: 8001 SW Hunziker Road OVERVIEW: This site is located on the north side of SW Hunziker Road, adjacent to Highway 217. It is approximately 6.4 acres. We are proposing to expand the parking lots on both the north and south ends of the existing building. As part of this work we also propose to revise some of the existing parking areas to make them comply with city code standards. There are no new buildings proposed with this submittal, but we are proposing to remodel the entry at the south end of building B to make it more architecturally appealing and work better with the new parking lot. This work will also include upgrades of the south elevation of building B. PROPOSED USES: This project consists of two large existing industrial multi-tenant buildings (A and B). They are currently occupied by industrial users (storage, manufacturing and office). As part of this parking lot expansion, we are not proposing to change the uses of the buildings. The areas and required parking are listed on the area summary table on sheet G1.0. SITE CONDITION: The subject property is currently zoned I-L (Light Industrial) and is occupied by two industrial (CMU) multi-tenant buildings. VEHICLE ACCESS: Primary vehicle access is accommodated off of SW Hunziker Road through an existing 50.0' wide common driveway and a common access easement located on the adjacent lot to the west. This driveway/access aisle also serves the existing building to the west. UTILITIES: All existing utilities are to remain. The only new utilities are noted below. 1. Storm. We will grade the new parking lots as required to slope to new catch basins (see water quality) and pipe to the existing storm pipe in the SW corner of the site that leads to the existing ditch on the south side of Hunziker Road. 2. Water Quality. The existing water quality (WQ) swale is to be removed and replaced with new WQ storm filter catch basins. All WQ will be handled in the new WQ catch basins. No new WQ ponds are proposed. 3. Sanitary. None required. 4. Domestic water: None required. 5. Irrigation water: We will tie into the existing system (if one exists) as required for all new landscaping or supply new irrigation from the existing water lines on-site. File:G:Wcad2010\210498\Correspondence\Narrative•2.doc Page 1 of 3 Printed: December 10,2010 Tigard Distribution Center Design Narrative 6. Lighting. The existing on-site lighting will remain for security purposes and new site lighting in the new parking lots will be added to be in compliance with design standards. COMPLIANCE WITH CITY CODE SECTIONS: The following will address the code sections that apply to the proposed work for this project. Please note the following: CHAPTER 18: A) Section 18.360.050(B) (Site Development Review): This project is being submitted as a Minor Modification because we comply with this section and are not considered a Major Modification. 1) (Dwelling unit density)...this project is industrial...N/A 2) (Dwelling unit ratio)... this project is industrial...N/A 3) (On-site parking)...We are not making changes that require additional parking; we are adding parking to comply with city code parking minimums and general design layout. 4) (Structure type)...We are not changing the type of the existing structures...N/A 5) (Building height)...We are not changing the height of the buildings...N/A 6) (Affect on off-site parking)...We are not changing the on-site accessways and the parking areas are being re-designed to improve on-site traffic flow which will not affect off-site traffic. 7) (Traffic to and from site)...We are not proposing any changes that would affect traffic flow to and from the site. 8) (Increased floor area)...We are not proposing adding floor area to the buildings. 9) (Common open space)...There is no common open space on this site...N/A 10)(Project amenities)...We are proposing significant upgrades to the landscaping and adding a picnic area in the space between the buildings, which would add to the project amenities, not reduce...N/A 11)(SDR conditions)...Due to the age of the project, we are not aware of any conditions of SDR approval that would be modified. B) Table 18.530.2: 1) We comply with all requirements of the I-L zone including minimum lot size, minimum lot width, minimum setbacks, maximum height, maximum site coverage and minimum landscaping. C) Section 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation): 1) The access and egress to this site off of Hunziker Road is an existing 50.0' driveway that is to remain unchanged. 2) 18705.30(F): The proposed revisions to the site will improve the pedestrian walkways from the building to the public street. 3) Table 18.705.3: a) The proposed site plan will have over 100 parking spaces and require (1) 50.0' wide driveway, which our existing driveway will comply. D) Section 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening): 1) 18.745.040(A) (Street Trees): This project has more than 100 feet of frontage and will be required to plant street trees. The landscape design will be part of the site work permit submittal following the Minor Mod approval. 2) 18.745.050 (Buffering and Screening): Per Table 18.745.1, we are not required to provide buffering and screening because this site is surrounded by the same light industrial zone (I-L). 3) The landscape design will be part of the site work permit submittal and we will comply with the city code requirements. File:G:\Acad2010\210498\Correspondence\Narrative-2.doc Page 2 of 3 Printed: December 10,2010 Tigard Distribution Center Design Narrative E) Section 18.765 (Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements): 1) 18.765.020(C): The proposed site plan is designed to comply with the current uses of the building and no change to the uses is proposed. We are proposing to upgrade the parking to comply with the city's minimum parking requirements. 2) 18.765.020(D): This project complies with the requirements to be submitted as a Minor Modification and shall be reviewed under the Type I review. 3) 18.765.030(B): The proposed parking lots are within 500 feet of the property line. 4) 18.765.030(D): The site plan includes a table indicating the requirements for each use in the buildings and the minimum parking required. We are proposing to meet these requirements. 5) 18.765.030(F): The proposed site plan indicates the required 5% carpool/vanpool parking stalls. 6) 18.765.030(G): The proposed site plan indicates the required minimum disabled- accessible parking stalls based on chapter 11 in the 2007 IBC. 7) 18.765.040(B): As stated in section C) above, the site is served by an existing 50.0' wide driveway. 8) 18.765.040(H): The new proposed parking lots will be paved with asphalt paving to match the existing parking lots. 9) 18.765.0400): The proposed parking lots have been designed to accommodate parking stalls that do not require wheelstops. In order to do this, we have designed the space with a 3.0' overhang beyond the face of the curb that will be low landscaping and is not counted toward our landscape percentage for the site. 10)18.765.050 (Bicycle Parking): a) Bicycle parking is shown on the proposed site plan based on the minimum required in Table 18.765.2. F) Section 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards): 1) 18.810.030: Because we are submitting for a Minor Modification, we are not required to provide any Public Work Improvements with this project. a) 18.810.030(E): Per our pre-application meeting back in 2008, we will be required to provide a 7.0' wide dedication along Hunziker Road for future street widening. 2) 18.810.050: We are not proposing any new easements with the current project. All existing easement will remain in place. 3) 18.810.070: The proposed site plan indicates new sidewalks along the new disabled-accessible parking stalls and along the building. a) Because we are not required to provide any Public Works Improvements, we will not be doing new sidewalks and/or planter strips along the street frontage. 4) 18.810.100 (Storm Drainage): The proposed parking lot expansion will be sloped to drain to the existing storm system and include water quality catch basins and storm water detention. File:G:\Acad2010\210498\Correspondence\Narrative-2.doc Page 3 of 3 Printed: December 10,2010 _ ' City of Tigard TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Request GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: VLMK Case No.: 1J DUD 3 Address: 3933 SW Kelly Ave Phone: 503.222.4453 Receipt No.: City: Portland, Oregon Zip: 97239 Application Accepted By S• 'K-C.rr Date: 1'I a i 't 0 Contact Person: Jennifer Kimura Phone: 503.222.4453 t i III 1 DATE OF PRE-APP.: �,l Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): TIME OF PRE-APP.: /I- v ) The Tigard Distribution Center, LLC PRE-APP.HELD WITI I: Rev.7/1/10 Address: 4800 SW Macadam Phone: c\curpin\masters\Land`sse'pp6cuiuns Pre-App Request App•doc City: Portland, Oregon Zip: 97201 Property Address/Location(s): 8001 SW Hunziker Road REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 2S101 BD00200 ® Pre-Application Conf.Request Form I-L 6 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Zoning ® Brief Description of the Proposal and any Site Size: 6.43 site-specific questions/issues that you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION © Site Plan. The site plan must show the All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn to scale. Also, show the location of the the applicant and received by the Planning Division a minimum of one (1) subject property in relation to the nearest week prior to officially scheduling a pre-application conference date/time to streets•'and the locations of driveways on the allow staff ample time to prepare for the meeting. subject property and across the street. A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of the (y7 Vicinity Map. Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday ® The Proposed Uses. mornings. Pre-application conferences are one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM. © Topographic Information. Include Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER Filing Fce;599.00 FROM 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROUP. City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97273 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 1 Tuesday December2010 January 2011 February 2011 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S I I 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 January 2 011 N t 26 27 28 29 30 31 ji 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 r r 30 31 Day 11,354 Left Week 03 Appointments 8 00 30 9 00 30 10°° 30 11 00 VLMK Jennifer Kimura 503-222-4453 8001 Hunziker MMD Conference Room#1 30 12°° PM 30 1 00 30 2 00 30 3 00 30 4 00 30 5 00 30 12/21/2010 12:34 PM 1/1 Shirley Cheryl Caines From: Gary Pagenstecher Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 4:48 PM To: Albert Shields Cc: Cheryl Caines Subject: RE: PRE2010-00030, Tigard Distribution Center, 8100 Hunziker: No TDT, no Parks SDC. Albert, Thank you for your review. FYI, Cheryl has agreed to do this pre-application conference. Thanks, Gary From: Albert Shields Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:50 PM To: Gary Pagenstecher Cc: Gus Duenas; Ron Bunch Subject: PRE2010-00030, Tigard Distribution Center, 8100 Hunziker: No TDT, no Parks SDC. Gary, in reviewing the documents for this Pre-App I note that no new buildings are proposed and no changes in use are planned for the buildings involved. The applicant has asked for confirmation that a Traffic Report will NOT be required for this project. The applicant acknowledges that they will be required to dedicate an additional 7 ft. of ROW. This confirms that, because there is no change in leaseable area and no change in use no TDT and no Parks SDC will be charged on the project. Further, no traffic analysis or report will be needed for TDT analysis purposes. Albert. DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 1 V L M K E N G I N E T E R S !IE!orn 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 www.vlmk.com TDC - Parking Pre-Application Questions December 10, 2010 Project Questions for Pre-Application meeting City of Tigard, Oregon Project: Tigard Distribution Center Location: 8001 SW Hunziker Road Planner, This project was worked on back in 2008 and we had a pre-application meeting with the city at that time (10-28-08). I believe that all of the issues were resolved following that meeting, but we need to verify that the following decisions are still valid. 1) We meet the criteria for a Minor Modification (see attached Narrative) and are not required to submit for Site Development Review. 2) Because we are submitting for a Minor Modification (MM), we are not required to do the following: a. Public Works. b. Underground of existing utilities. c. Move/change sidewalks. 3) The only item at the street that we are required to do is provide 7.0' of additional dedication. 4) Civil Issues: a. It is our understanding that Water Quality treatment will be required for this site and it is based on the entire site. Correct? b. It is our understanding that detention is required for this site and it is based on all new impervious area. Correct? 5) The owner would like to propose constructing this project in two phases. Can we obtain MM approval for both phases at this time and not be required to go through the MM process twice? 6) We are NOT required to provide a Traffic Report for this project. Correct? 7) We will be required to obtain a Service Provider Letter from CWS for the MM submittal. Correct? 8) There will be other issues to discuss, but this hits the highlights. Structural Engineering•Civil Engineering•Industrial Engineering•Planning•Studies/Evaluations•Entitlement File: G:\AAcad201012104981Correspondence\Pre-App-Questions-1.docx Page 1 of 1 Printed: December 10,2010 D E F c H m Trcb _ IIV ; !mL— CUNT•�� - ` i DAR i,s1iL iirsi ,---- w- r �� ELAnN a f N h9rgp ,RR*L- ♦ ,• � � �� rr Go *Ty I r4 �- .410• ati A Min '_ la \,,.....- ." - ‘,.....„. l = !,I FI- V SANb �' 4 51ro 0 ,G GINA ` y 5 Hl ENp� illikti'''.7 iAo MC b r , • *RLYNE --. r , TVtEW� 1IpJ►K f EAD04v ■r �, OW ti E F G H PROJECT SITE ,,, L SITE VICINITY MAP IN.T.S. G:vcWzoom0rAcu75 eco.dwY.17J144010 18 3R 16MI ik 1/ i t r�<<y'�r` ciu'*t 1 1y..�. ` •---S: tat (�/ n k.-It •�,•/4, w� 3' + ----=-44 s ! '� F�,'h _•1aa• °'�` _•ate•��\ �,��f _ _...� ,,i ! t1 r �°l r• r %a./,/ }' r if l t1 �J .fir ` ^� l 4 k ) ------F ifw.•— - 3 iii —W iff---•. °9 ...,, , / ,?, , // 33''.5 t(.. A - '.01' '„.., 0 ....4111111f, -....-.--.1. ( , S ^ `W�� s , i rn •Gotacmi arm I r•'�.6 .,536/ `�f• / ` / �� �a. 4s,---3,T.. X.: �/ ^-0 Vii:),ti�,`` r // r • r . a• , , - S.7 d. ...,•.,-, ], b: '1 / f t' = 73.8 i 3�_., _ a.`„). =- c . , ���. , .i . :s Haul- ® '' N :a+^txa a•w 9 -r ,wry ; ; ; , �? 1 1. '. J •. /sl u, i , +. a' G� 15 w /` .+•4••• ;;P '10 55�` 'i .�- • . ..�..--i53 i &��+ 3• rC..4').').�5 '}3.59 Oi ....e,� •-R., _•_:• ksA A. , , / 153.8 1535. . ';'.1_ Vito.' . . .k i ' + $ ♦ 155-19 •�''°P` •ISL3- I+r- ' _J' .1 e �`� X2..94 •. A� SA aFlowo arrw -r` a1AOMi Firm ;3L -� =• -- ]5'1.65 6'� e'�Z ®• . \ ' ® r s SNN t/�1}x� n/yy r•• r , r . 08"27- 2-W--- a "uD F..1t 157.50(S41E0) ill e 4,4 ini r • r - a J w A ti 1i ,n: -N 1• 6 Cz y i jE�� ----.9.--...••••••••• O • �•••• 111 in MT •I" b M� , •. ^1 may'' ` I, ..« ia is' .°'. �•' �� ,^ mom' w*/{���,•r� _ : . V� 1�� .. ,•. ma X01 .. .1�� �6 6i', 1' !�.� d.. OM•••••• 82 Q i : lP31• •_ttlNUi.--16X i .-_— •e _�• a 1�••w V•1 SS``.d'J �..__-,'-�'JR�.+ .°�—"��•i-b 1)34 e+4,i-.10i��40.2-"' 191.7 7E5-- _ ''.�sG .... 0��°.•" L` r °'.•"•• glil (71 *Y4"l/ -NliA;) -_Q,..,..+ L. `'.. A''•''''2] ,.,,,,,, /•._-!�__ 6 ., ♦ , �•I5, 7• MOW WM..MEI••••••■•I•�1.02 Y.NMI,•�1i••r1 .,a T+� �_...�)'. '�. F ��..�_..,Y•! .!4 • �. rur�r••�r•rr•••••rww s•,y a,awwrr •n r ra••�r•a•Mr .=40� a a•. _r 4 •w••M N.••n•n•R r.3 ice• ®�IAOIp S . �.r °+�Mall ,•w MI••S••3...AM•NM N • s • . G2.1 1 G:Vcad2007\207540\207S40G2.0.0w9,12/10/2010 10 48.26 AM i "s r il a t• . .. r-- '4.' a . " •ill tE •,..,,, tom s 't . . f� ` \ `4 41:). • .1; '" ' • \' ' .� ti - Ty,-_- ,q -...-i .�.��..`. \\ 1 . �_ _j �zs raa \. •. i�■ I o• I Rik . _tt. p • Y I P ,,.18 JI"Er II ei ,i� 'i' :� ,, �� ; . �.._;1 II ;3 Iii � M ` I t -I!� ;�*"' !D L lilliii i 11110 il 11 I NO I III Iii i 0;1 • 1i!iiUI " e li I1J / "0 11 C! I 1:114 El 11 1. I i! i i I ;11I11 .1Ii • Ar ■ 1 - •1 i i j i " . I 4 ,`4•iI fl r"'. -. 1 ■ lie4eeelerF.� �flt.L. l 1 al I t..i i. -jI'IjIIj 11 it , A t'e•..0 ! ' t t A I 111. 1 illii�w6 ;:r. �I rN �nfl w■' i= 1. u,, ; e - �. , S9 ! i K.Aa*r.f f0..►1S■1 \ VA . :•w4 t--- 4 ' ' • F E 11!111 •∎ k,°' ■. . 11 I : 1 1 i 1 ,\ : .... : ; �1 . - ,s, ( ! ' I I n KN LOT ExPAN4OD>5P IUTION CENTER -` - W IU bKER ROAD � RAMO. I I h C O Mi.U N![N■ — ..r..Y Imam• mi•Ir..'�.�° ` 1 SITE GRADING PLAN - ..N ..—. 1 ', CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT � . 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 180755 - 12/21/2010 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID PRE2010-00030 Pre-Application Conference 1003100-43116 $522.00 PRE2010-00030 Pre-Application Conference-LRP 1003100-43117 $77.00 Total: $599.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 1049 STREAT 12/21/2010 $599.00 Payor: Karl C Klokke Total Payments: $599.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 1 0 r R 1 IN .. 1:11111111111; m VI!ail( E, 111 f. i, "e N i z Will giti i1i!IE III+ iN. . ill • 'i. r. S 4. lir ��11111! II 15 1 s 111! 'B. _ ,° 1111 lial F It. i i E,. i Oil 1 li! i!I i pi p ' ■�d `iii ii, v ' is i i°° ° II �:F` a a::::61 is; i:� Eli .: ! !! : 111:::: ::: !U 1 i i '7 aD ":„. .. B�� Hi qq 1111111 � � nr viii.,,:..,.. Ye i wC ifr „og i ' ! ter' 1 MI wig !♦!� a ,, , i!! i �l i \ 1 i i-..._.. ....__ • -1.It lip! ' i MIMI Ital.ie •I•• r ir.1 OEN ! isaiLi a \ I !: :el. r i'[l �.. Fur _ % 4 II 1 S. r si : i i lij;i1 SF 1 i = ma, !CO �� OW i i ial€,i� i 0: MR. i i +tl�T�I' i f° �a�l I i i-;4�1`i �..• 11° ii 6 . ja +— Vic, eeee eoe se_ -'-t-.,2.,..,,,, iiiii1�iii`� i. ~e �� �i.� lia! iiiilit`i_ . . �t 'FPI' 11111 w''':.nt4 '-:"'•::-.....:• :- 1 i! j I ..II"...+:..m,}i g 9 i i. t 1 TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER 0 . : , PARKING LOT EXPANSION E000 SW NUNZINER ROAD 1 C o N[U L T I N c t 'OGAPIO,GROOM ` ••" t N G I N f[•a '.,•M� . b +i SITE PLAN fc j �,.. t ,` Si r . .i II . ..e_ f tt! ! �l •. ? \ f 5076501 "y -- •,19', Ir ,.''ti4 •. � �7,50 765 0 615 ` S . `J'507650 f 8195 J _ t t" fr _ - . ^-�_ 1,507650 -.;...e.. 8197 Y ~7 t , 7650 j :F! `t.gN� .t` 8185 d , r't P t.. •'� 1 ,� _ • r 8185 f $ +�. f / t_ r '' 4 • 0 I , '800` Ilk t A. ;, tt ■ 1 4 rrrrr :, 1 7885 "• .. , , , . .r -� r* rJ iil k .. . ilip- " , .- Ire 1 •., a \c /.. CA i / 11 ,- 1� •f - I}� 1'l I �. t .,\ , A, 756 II ! n \t t ' , '•!`l lj \\ '-.". - I. \ k,,,,,,\, . lip, . f -r - ',...' . •�/ . Feet ,i. J ,... 0 . . .:Zt - S. it�' • j ;.,Yl•• - E. r 1': r. _ f I. r Schedule of Drawings: T D C Parking 8001 AND 8006 SOUTHWEST HUNZIKER ROAD TIGARD, OREGON Project Directory: Vicinity Maps: Owner: Engineer: Site Surveyor. Description of Sets: Klakk•Certau VLMK C627,711174 flMnten Weddle BurwylaS,lac p a 1109 NaU 21st',treat 3933 Southwest Kee,Arenas 695C SW Nanplm Sliest,Suite 170 • Bois*.Wdmo 83702 Portland, d 97239 71950. Oregon 97273 Phone. (208)377-.7099.051k• Prime: (50.7)212-NS] Films (503)595-8702 yB uer, ��c Conlatl. Kea Klawm• COr..loci hal G LarnaM.felon DuON Gmtxt. TmY Ryon B11 [.yet Cae•S tfm :1,111111111 Phone: (208)412-6411.Katie Col. 1 , S .. 1770 NMI Sou Stmt.Suite 5344 ,.,. ,`!�1 C,e ra w. .••,•■ ■ B ees.Wise 03707 yr: .J-ie •t• rn WONG nw --.. ■■ U ■ '■ ill P hone: (208)545-4349 qil. Ca yr W...ataas -- • •• ••• • COnloct• Ales KIW - L wn n man ear. ---__ ��■; ■■1 ■� Jurisdiction: Landscape Architect:_ Wetland Consultant: --- � -Gael as 31.•••c010•01. O ■■■1: :II :■1 Ouea and Auociates Paeine Habitat Sa.iwt,Inc a2 oval•.+1•tum coda nx. ■■■�■6 �E■C ■ • City TIBUd,Orgies 4 •�...•. u>f MOM a smrr cawi tuns -. ■■ .■p■.�■ i:•3933 Soutr•eal Kdy Are Suds B ■ 13125 Seulnwwt Nd 91.d 9540 SW Commerce 9707 Sane i80 alJela �---- Pane (503)9 972j9 • use sa news ■ Flom (503) 9-41 Prime (5031 9i2-03,1 Pt.,. 3)57 9701` ciao serene.'mew ... ■ ■■ ■ ■ Pesos 150.7)639-4,7` Cmtoc: 117 HUem9oc. Pnory (503)570•0800 Mir MI ui ia•aea awt ■t I■■ill:11in Contact Chee0 Calms(eWum49) Contocl. Shown Eisner . Cs*Duena(En9ew•e19) *SITE ICIMTY NAP .,, so0 Set WIMP -_ • •■.•..■.'..■.110 VI a art PLOT-t••rte aaotr.; ■. •••- ••••••••• e set u+esc tt rya • ■..■..sii. .• Schematic Site Plan Sec sheet GLO: MD sae r,r-m...at a ■■■a 1 ■..I■MAI i =C■:U1:■■.®0.• 74 a : - • - • _9.1.'97UL pl. i I ! t I . i l ! / .. t , . / 1111.1. 1 I / t SV■V‘.....b 00••:::■■■•." '' 118,4•1,•04•11C W., • ' /7 Ali 0 on o _— . . . 't 'i h ..., 09000 %, ,,-,-,,//://-",7,--,-,--,/,:,,:, ';; ,.:.-:-/-,.,,,?../.-z,-/,4,,,',7.--•-,,,..', z.--;,',..:-..,-,-;.--.//,'% -_, .I . t, •% '' .0// / ... -- =MN E 407/9: '' .' '26:4tht.' . ...,.- .•..-•-......1- , ,-- * .i -..,7- ,1715717r":4ti.',..5711r,'4'.:4"."'''' • .: - - ;!• / .. e ' 9 •,;air ' !. 11 • ,..m.......3. 4 ... . .. • '' Ay/ ,,. '' '. . 'LoF •4 / '....ew (} • , ..,1 ......Plea Of 1 I .• "7' • , 1 I 1 . B '• i , - 1 - • ; .age 11•1. .9 1 1.7 1 0 -.7":77. -• .!..-... ,• • k .......oki '.' ". I 1 I 1 ......., •,,. .• ' - : - ''' . ■ ..... , i . • ... a..,.s..., l''-',1,r/Y .. • :. ,./. : :.; . t --..-i-,b-;----T-1 , 1 .... a -.■ V" . . i - M •°: usn.., Oar. •■•• L • 4( 1 - • tt. / ,r 1 0. i . . • •W GM W •, .,., V "i k'ir.. n • .:.,A.!. ... n Z i! .47 ..... r „it., MIMI ..t..°"" " 114 -‘..-%.,,- .-,;•','; ,• '4,, 7.. :•:. •, .,, u. 4k . . L.21, ,,, -• -_.•••JIL :::,.,._,„ _a • '‘'•T...:1'-'..... %:. '=%•4' • .... . . •• il -: ..*•:di , f ! •-s�.ur�,s,.w mss. irovk SA 1�ir' ,•;, fit- ;1...1,:m- Y1-�. \\'... !fit,'pi` );•`.,\ • a er a �1� T i -- d ,�r .1 EEE . E:; 1� - �� �.... 1_ ' \4., f ■ U iii, E.�.• :i- '..a 6A pi is a 6i 1 --\\\ -':ZA�l*"•Q9Eea}..E `�o Ira e t gg a y Y 0, s` 'e :I I ? 0 " L h, -__I _ .I Q p••1 i. ` 4 !_.L' 144.7— il, ` ' - r0 V\ \ ! - ° P -: ! `%ia4bA9faHiP • .. .y6 E ai `i fi- C I a \\�8 x, ' : O; 1aI., , :1 ,...i. bay _ - ,. ___ . ii$G 6- _QaaR..5'4:baaut.; `-;.- 4..1 $a -r I� .\ l . z te I E 91 111; 1 ' i 14 ' # 1 .1 * « I , I -1s1 . tlE1 � . g r , rE t ,J -0 ' ;'t • . , f om 0�•JJt �� Pi- i " Q2 11 is :a .a I a.�.,. :; ;- :'x. . b1 2 \ `'"i$ rr * as o' -g' ` ♦. • pa a ag.f a } I a" ... . , aalr�w-� 1. 19a� C le i AA 7$J :t I 1 1 j4iF- " oeEetaa i3a tl a ! .y-s s1_ -a r� • R 4a'' • \ Fe as•' r3' k .., 1, i :t ; 1 a' 'WAR I I_1_ \ � s a :", i•a „; 'a• . i 1 I alit I lix. fa 6 is 2 . <.f _ y'1 \ ?s". 0 �° ° ■ - 1�4�llit �«? Al x! l ill!• s 1 !ir la i ;f'5 y g! 13! i,q \ - , � 'p t - 1.► .••> a- Rx " iq a � ` I x oxi !• [ N I �\ . 1. " ' a ERE I E�� 110!l ! ,\ t; .'1;!••■2 S.ip. °I' .:•-. .;L...s,s'ill'Illpi..:'441*••■1. • i a• V 1 r I r f =TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER 1 6 I PARKING,LOT EXPANSION :,:....,,..,......7:: •"' z. • NJ t 8D0'S,• �Jg2..(R AG�" I , I I\ I e, O t I-f} rcuo.Draw Mow,,r.•"•r«..}.aw•.mM•MI — ' SITE GRADING\EROSION CONTROL PLAN . ,., ' ..., . • ■ •)6U' ■ ` 1. •I', \ /' t ''. EJ061BIC WIC /' I II •/• ., , ;,-,. i`%.%' 1 • %7 ./27/7 /,,• //i//,,..Z,•;/,'' • .,1; • ••• n: ;' __ v • y/,y ._ �lr tw I —T C 1 1 I � r: • .. ,. . ,i j o o j s . ,/ 1— i I 'y 171-* t- _ . _... _ . ...... I -..... .,,r..1.:11/ ..,',471 1 j Tel\ a N. PI :1 I ? ,,,,,,• .,.,Ir . / ., t I wg: Oil.. ,., . . '...,...1 /. .. ,.,,,,.ilty,g1;011510,. shogiggimikw4iPmEIME:reohliiil woo ii '-- _...witlawr ."4111ge: i , , •Irirrig.„01 17 ....... = i '•_•.•+.. _. 141._•__,_-..•� _�.r ..�.. -_- ._. ..._ —_....-_--- ' �/ x „04.„......�'711 '/ — —----' a B. _.�_ c• A- _' __-- _ ._.-- _. .- (AS-- x_17 - -� -.. _fir— .t_.. •fit— — - IV -.-1+^i 0111, �.sl�.•H �..� --1-- ,-.;,-. ..-:.w .'r J—s,-��. __•. f L '—v - — ...�:•.. te.._�'i/. Tss+� 7r:. _ - .,•fir ��. ,, �' _ M.��� / �,.-:�.• t!" i / 7rrrr�r r t I a,°° r/'Pin 1 / IMLIMOIFi • SITE UTTIJTY PLAN V. IRLITY ISEYMDIEB \ i \I I,, cow:%,..,.••w s" _w••0•w•_•o•.rWH.•Ew•.•••••••r•,a••••., Q •A�u�•. M•A�_ •r•o..•�• :ills, ce •• ir •�'mow w,M.∎••••8 �:."�mow.•NMC. '."« r • • . . �r� 'r•n..0�«' we s.,o W sY.., ..r.moi'.uo•11.«"wo:•°•'i°o,•°•'S,••°/OMWNWWOMNv um'�.°..w.vvs, r•.•E•os. o••_.• LaJ •mi•�u no.Primly cY•ill.s o w..r.0..•c_..ca•cMw CM...,•.EWH.w•.. SITE WFORAMTION raw. .01.•••••0011 •w.,...•.K Wu.°,•rr••••„r..e..MI e,. •.••I•IEO•a•IramPlio••r rr•••r Z .,..._.•..,.,.•.•w..e..a,._,..,e.•••..�s•...or,.....•.m,.a ,'r°.,s..am••,...°r°_•••••••• •• a May,-.•�rrr.�r•./we — �. .....•�•..0 g ••-•r••r. u •• w r 0°Z a ••••••••W..•,..••••.rn•n....•°.°_∎•••„•••a: • li III it I i 1 . a (p i*Lif I r i ', II 1�I! 1 I1111 6 1i1 mil i # ItY Uli � I I '' • ol'rr �� n pi i `: 1 i, tti 46j 11 I`13t I _ i i r'I aE',r'lELL'C i p �.� I �! ' 5 III;a eit;d:rL a', a j , _ ' - _ �"i! E I ! 1 E!! !!. M-.< lIi= 118 a a g e a , �l;t,eeeL,c i4�a °II fla El i i i i e i ; {! /) a �� ! ,� �fl i I € 1 1 1 i " °., ti'..:� 1 iii- 1°l `c Ili ' f aa i)!`r ■ i x,4,,04.=•eh.,r.ef:1,24vG 1I ! .. .�,.T ,,.,,,e"E 1 iiii FA 00 aO ` 1 _ f g.f. } ! '„.....[0.•+--- e 6 /py� •� •.milli :; /{ sv ti£Ri�dj� I 11 Di I iif to 1E `1s6T t;11 I 1a Zia 10 ri il-I 1 II 'i ► • I I` 11 a J : 11 . iii r-• 11 1 a Y .. I . —warm h a. i 1• ila"!�1 1 �`�',� ,I I L I X l� ce+ I �U'.::,� f r�.:..y g e.'.' - _a.__O'' 41••••- r -MIN 1 Ire. I °'--) .o !� � ' .— '-; t II �ji`f�il�i ii 1 A —or �� ` -.! . Ill 1 Milli lil�li 1 I� '�� 1 y A y�y ,00— I i Or i►U+R� (� 4. I ,�l �y � I i 'li; �'I;j i ii!. � r �I• f':. , '�: ��I.\ 1 ► !tai--1s~S %� wi------ -C14 11 11• I I II A‘, -.■ '•1/4%,, ,Atillrititt'areAti;' ---- , I MI- , if it I sil ---- i. 11 i 5i1 i!`I i1li#� ij9 :} 1 �` "fi141�k _ ;' iE;. / N' I - .- -_I t I! Iii .I:1 a- — .-`— ' ' 7`. ., , r 1 . -_ - -. z- \���� -.om.\N a I I iPA NRDTDIS DISTRIBUTION CENTER �oMSUI* •c I L ..,. MJC S.ruNZ1N[4 RJ.0 ` I-`I I. ,M G 1 M.!.S -�� ` t i-.., nca.a•Cc. »»,w..w, . w.w a w_r»»». ~.tea ____ SITE UTILITY PLAN DETAILS .G ,., • a*-�. 7-- y r 1.1 '_ `v W � - I WWI.ww ao- ,I_.._ I 1 . tea` a' MI (tit: �, � I 11I Tr. R TPI AI.SIDEWALK SECTION w....1 ...f ©SIDEWAl1(RAMP •• -aw TJ+:T-a 0 TPICAL B 7.f1. vr..l r fi d t w S lti mem M1 IMO{Ydt♦11(.4(5 Z I yI t .t... - C1N1.t1Na It 1 45 i li 0 BIKE RACK Oct...L ,,..., Ksx ._w H. yam '1 y �I — (2'6 <14 ®111E1" N I' 1:. . � 1 — +! w i n re R t,.a, _ ---4-2,1r.: C lat-- :� — I I i:::-.7.--7.1'.17::=—-- '-' g g t 2 (:.1.3 / ° t a ••• ••M+FU.+.._ry QAOCESSI(E B PARICP ®8 ENEM(OED FLOOR PUN NC W OM nOM ...G5.0 ►.,.....__, sbr z,,r r/1slu • • ItoISIaNS _•_ Topographic Survey ~,_t4 � �""°�'� . °rte`°° TIGARO DISTRIBUTION CENTLR . ,- ......-..,-I PART OF A TRAC1 OF LAND IN r, TIMT...« SECTION 1. T.2$., R.1W., W.M. w,,,�•�, .1. 'i• i City of Tigard, Washington County """ +•�/ � ^. , Oregon to,40t0(':-"%::, „%;•*-_,F-7:::4----- t•w• 1 ��,�/I`' i /Ipi _I 'yrr�--=7--_--...-.. .......z__ .. -�- iwi1 c D.;.•••-• Ii.. ■s.��..�" 'K nos •P • j II 1 ""I i• •� • _ r _�_ ~�• I►t ` if . \\I .- S� rl yi� �I •fi7,- 1 SIR.. !� \ 1 1 I .R.w—` •e AR:':..l, `fi.\ . :'r M ±I III "` Y I i _ ,'r../ 7' i; • \•--.4.-.., , _ /i• . 1 • ..I. tc_ q rt h a tom`^ wy- � ,✓.-. 1 :w;'''�. J'�_- o�- +7m+r ~"�°o,".'" I ... �D d w r `c'�_. .t�.`.. ..�GG�YY� �� .. ,14:.........7.-z. (..7--. at _�r 11 �4S .L l.'/.•. _ .. 'l /f.. f7/ „�j f// g 31 r lei / „ , r .• • - / " Z. � �: a.- C -, Ir>/ , fat:, — : � ° .... ✓' _T • V Dir... i• k ew um IMIMIIIIM IN.. MINAS=er I�Wrt WSAS Or rlrW'NN/S -I- °' :.,-.=r".••-•• MIMI OM MCA NM -- --- - ------ siFsi► rJ,o/ry - . . __.._. • -- . • •.. :•,:z4. 1 1,6 i ',, .....•rx ,,,..Iv • . IN i. 1 " / -- / •-s..,4:0,--\.,•a/ \ 1 kti 1 Ic•‘i /07.„ /5 r...611116 BACK .14 ,,......,....;:„;;;,,,:. 000 0 .7, -.....,....\ __.. .. i .!:X, '.i 4/ic 0 y'0 0 0 0',( /./ .;7 ,/ /7/1/ 27, //'//X 7/7; // ,,,,...,,•••ii,///•:;::. .• ,.7 . •.------ - -• - ......-:--...-ore■.-.-_!!_tr*--=-_.t-- ._-- .-- _1.. -- -;--;-*:" • -.1-amiww-wil■-•... ,....1-el I s - .•••-7j:,4".. ;,,• --- ••• • •-••••••• -•••••• .............,..„-:---- -...--•••...................:::•:•............:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:•:-:•;•+:-..-:-:. r••••..-0,,-.,--.,-.-,,-;,.,.---,,•: 1, - • / -,- ..---,- .•' ••,-,.--f- -•;•••••,?;1.--;,-..,,,,-,_:--:i,,:•,,k,.., ..,:1,Ltz;-,,---.,..---'''''7,-.;,,:,.4: ::•. *:*,-,:*-,:----,,-„:„.:-- .•_. ..•- , k. -,- --- -- 40 e::- ,-../- .- • i -- I -.-..:-:- , I - f - ' ' .• 4/14c •-.- 1 Al.••;..; ...4i.--r4-' '' "' .: t ' ': 11'- i.• , ..... • 4/ f"....,,.',• '''',""•-•"' , , , . 1 t..1 . PI ; ...I . 1 •, , '- '............'--, •,' .t,- , .. v , 1,7114J- , —1-- II 1 -1- 1-1 • - -- - ••-•- -- I 1 I _ ,.. • ii / , 1 1 , I I . ..• •-0;w.---V--. ''' . ...• r. '.-.. . la.' ' 4 i S 1 ; i ..• , - i if I I -1 - 171- t - • = .., __ 1 _1 " \ .1.ft,. t....■ ila I • I • a ' - - . 4 : A ; .. , . . , ' i si i . •• „.. _... .. hitt ,roz. ; tt'.. e:-. .•'. 4,k,,... ,, , K ,- ! f ..-.Ag. . .. - .'7.--40-1 .0-7,. .1 •4• ---i,'..:',,.., . .,..14,.•,,......, ;, , ,. _... ■ , -•.:I - N• ■ . -- ...-. , . • ,'■' 14,40.',V .t.-4,4/ .......;s'A\ IX • -4.,, . .4 I 4i - ,• r ' - .7,---.Ir.._ . , ,r,,--r--•;". 3 , 14. , // - I 1 .::;--7--:'.-. --:;.--:-- , - • • ,■..r.:_ . - -`... -. . , .:i•* Icitt: t. _ ,.. ..... e ; •- •' i :;i.. :*,_'!,1:.............e. ...?...,,..,.„4..4,,,.....1'...'1.,.. ''',,......x.,...,4_,:.,‘.4.7.,...:r.......7.. .''1 ;:.1,1;1•..,,,i..:;;.:5....:;:..,"1ii,,±:,,,(, ../ ...I.A:.....,:1.\...,:...--:: -.1.....:;117/:. ::::...,-:: :... l . , 772,.:,7,,..,/.....,..,//,•..,..;r1.,/.. ..-,1:..c...,7.....10:r...i1.,,e1::•,47.:...17_:.1._,L.,. - ::17,,...:4.1 ,iiiii:nitle_h :t• . ' '.!. osnt su.uak VI. ' %-, ?. • IV. ' i I •• / , f -------- _ - - ----• -----___...._..--_ s 'le/. /7 -------------------------___. . - .( (414 SITE PLAN-EXISTING ....., '..V- Imrimnommos ."1■11 0 . . . . . wow. lam, COS214.11111.1.1111■1111.. .-- r"=.LA.;Inarrii BM a•VO. ......„... W.A. rm.. Mal-WINIMILSMICIS— Z ..... ..u.2.1 a.owe. , •••••:. ="'• ---:- ---;1.: =Jam&rum ors. Da < Ion ow new , _ .... — .".we. ea Mr& .... L••••••• 7 ...r.... ,:i..,....... _ ..17 .. rlen on V MOD OW. r7-71.311.1•6 ark aa. mun z........ o 0 ,............. o z g0 . P .... a . m 6 z g v 0 0 CI,! '`,;:' CIO'' 2 1-11 R- 2,f,t (/) ogo g -54- gag La ,..,..... NAM •••■ ' ...... EX1.0 • 4 b, c.r gift Ji f 1 • 0611111-25.1117.00111.21A1.1114.6111LZKINS. 1-.. • Orb rn.••.—..'....••••••••� . tl✓.y t::. .I r• r.«..✓ ww�'-a... r....w SI nw.fw r•..r^..nr r.+..............�.r r^ter•w r•+• I r••-•••,/•lbw••••r• Lamm, -� r._.•.w.1. ....». .•.•b:•.•www»••••••..••.•..ri.4 ..r r•.r rr.it r w.....w-.._.o w wwr Iw■r.•.S.+rw r•.w.l...r.... __ - .7•- \ _ ...MO...N•.:.•.....••••.......w»•••.••w w•..r.....VW �.�!'r.0-.r. •' t O r• •r. s ....WNW.w 5.i...r n✓w w rar. - r • r d.r...••••••••.•.........-•W.....wn...........r.r �/ • �'��}� ` •wry w+•._N•••••••• �•r.r.•r•..—w.�.:-�• o�•a ...b•r...M r r li.~w..'•r..ri W...ir........M r OW n Sc ow „',F -ir .• '.,711 0■fal.wot wn AI•ro:•......0..........:,..........1•w.«......•r,....I .w.. .U.•.do ..... ".'.'....s o....NOW...t w r....w...wY...... ' s�)�'1gW�(a(// �OI�..�� .4....r•..�/........i r............11.1.0+../r.•t..y..r n•.•.L_w i.r.•.. r +r.••••r w...•..•\►.Y w w r•..r••••••••••••✓e....r. p'y'•RI.0 ...--+-,,i`. row..w..rr. ...r.. ...^•i....r._I.r... ...w+r r rr a add....•W LLLIMMIIMMM !! .OR 1. 4. WW1 mow.✓]we w..•Wpm✓ ••..w...a .ML M..•w w•ur ......'. Y..... Ys (we mewl• t, y I++i.. . wool•..I lo....M.I..r M tie_ /w.. r•ww••11 Wm.M we.• .••••.I Y rw..ww..r We r.r.r r w arc - S-YK• 'I. `! taw '•.r•»r•..:r row.ww..•r,w .••w r....i.'N.....:.r 1.•..••• '.• �w rw w4 r.....r Wm...ww. we•......•o.....l r w •••∎••••✓•....wow••••••r::Iwo••w`= 1 •• •• 1 ,-F--- 1 '.• . . 1 — ... 0 • ... • 1 i , 1 I ; ._------ - ' 1 ' 0 . — __ • • ; • .1 I . I G ., .. 1 0 I • , - ii II . . • __.: ____ 0 , ,KI 1 , 1 I ,TTr-- MIME r :... . =I • 1..,:i \I • -: --1---------/ I . 1 14 I I4 ilIl 11, ,1.1111 I 1 I" -• , qv. . .1 ' 91 ti i; .....s... .., —r,<'1•:••••,.-f ,c-r s r,,,,,as I. 11 !fig 5...17 ill I P te .,/ .....L<-3 _ l •• -• ••1 _ r: 4-• •6',_I .. t ••e t _.... ••••-••••7•• —1-- ._._. , . mai__ ei. , _111 v, t ''.•...........j II ;1 6:N\'' *\_ 6 I i0 a :v4k4'■\ / . (.1...) ......■ et-s• -1 i •••••• A 1 0 0 CI) l'o 1 TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER zt > . • ,1 PARKING LOT LXPANSION Z.. • ..... . 1 K330 S*HUA21•Eli KO•D \ I ‘1 k .;:ts,uLT'ING r-.X.' - — —, 1,... 0 1•1 i MOM CACGCN • Igo zoo,a... v..11.•• •••,,..P1230-.13 •••••.•••••• i • FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B 1 _ .... 6 y I I. 7 ii .I*.- kl(: ii ill xi 1 ' __. _Co — ^ j�i !_ I — 1014I l' a i II :III , /11 al - • _1/_ • • I 1 O 11 i I ___ _11__] 1! H - _o i4j21ft ; o Ili I' Ill .. i '-'■cifi$i , i - I ----H. } r i .. is f 16 . e n c t a 13 e I TIOARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER _J____:___._ PARKING LOT EXPANSION C o r f u �+r c +n,r+ - a N SOREGON REP RC+.. ` I `I I. [r G I M[E.f 'I3'I EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS m+P...+...00. 0..... f 'MI on 1--- — Cheryl Caines From: Bill Lambert <billl @vlmk.com> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 5:40 AM To: Cheryl Caines Cc: Gus Duenas; Mike White; Havlin Kemp; Brian Dubai; Robert Leger; Jennifer Kimura Subject: RE: Site Development Review 2011-00002 Thank you Cheryl. I will contact Frontier and see if I can address their needs. Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl()vlmk.com htto://www.vImk.com From: Cheryl Caines f mailto:cherylc @tigard-or.govl Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 4:06 PM To: Bill Lambert Cc: Gus Duenas; Mike White Subject: FW: Site Development Review 2011-00002 Hi Bill, Below are the comments we received from Frontier about the Tigard Distribution Center. Cheryl From: john.cousineau @ftr.com fmailto john.cousineau @ftr.comj Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 3:25 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: Site Development Review 2011-00002 There are indications of facilities being moved so the developer needs to contact Frontier so plans can be drawn up. John R. Cousineau Frontier Communications Northwest Inc. OSP Network Designer Phone 503-643-0371 Fax 503-643-0977 I Can Help You! This communication is confidential. Frontier only sends and receives email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.frontier.com/email disclaimer DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules"City General Records Retention Schedule." 1 Cheryl Caines From: Gus Duenas Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 4:03 PM To: Bill Lambert Cc: Mike White; Cheryl Caines Subject: RE: TDC - Parking (Power poles) Attachments: Agustin P Duenas P E .vcf Bill, We typically compute the undergrounding along the entire length of the property line when the utility lines continue beyond the property as part of a continuing system. However, upon review,the last pole terminates in the location you show and the line to the billboard is a mere service line. We will stop the undergrounding computation with the last pole as you have indicated. We'll accept the numbers as shown below and I'll revise the condition I have written to reflect that. The undergrounding fee-in-lieu payment needs to be made prior to final completion and approval of the improvements proposed for the project. It typically is paid prior to certificate of occupancy, but since you are not doing anything with the building, I will tie it to the proposed improvements. Gus Agustin P. Duenas, P.E. IIII City of Tigard Development Engineer (503) 718-2470 Work T IGARD (503) 969-4188 Mobile gusatigard-or.gov 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 wnr,w.tigard-or.gov From: Bill Lambert [mailto:billl @vlmk.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 2:51 PM To: Gus Duenas Subject: FW: TDC - Parking (Power poles) Gus, Good afternoon. I was curious if you have had a chance to review this email?We are getting close to submitting for building permits and I would like to get this issue resolved before then if possible. Thank you, 1 Bill Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl @vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com From: Bill Lambert Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 7:13 AM To: Gus Duenas Cc: Karl Klokke; Havlin Kemp; Brian Dubai; Cheryl Caines; Jennifer Kimura Subject: TDC - Parking (Power poles) Gus, Good morning. I know that we have discussed the issue of the city requirement to underground the on-site utilities and based on my research of the costs, it has been decided that we will be paying the fee-in-lieu for the lines required. I have had several discussions with the owner about this issue and he does not want to pay for the lines that are feeding the billboards (A and B on the attached exhibit). As you can see in the attached photos, the power lines that serve the buildings stops at pole#8 (photo#3817) (photo#3814 is pole#9) and only a single power line goes from there to the other poles and finally to the billboards. I have drafted the attached exhibit to use in our discussion of what the city is going to require in terms of overall length of line that will be charged with the $35.00/foot. You had mentioned in your earlier email a distance of 1,060 I.f., but based on the notes above, we feel that the overall length should be 850.5' (from the SE property corner to pole#8). If that is acceptable, the fee for this should be 850.5 x$35.00 = $29,767.50. We understand that this fee will be paid prior to issuance of the PFI permit...correct? Can you please review this and let me know your thoughts? Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billftavImk.com I http://www.vlmk.com DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 Cheryl Caines From: Bill Lambert <billl @vlmk.com> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 11:36 AM To: Cheryl Caines Cc: Mike White; 'Karl Klokke'; Havlin Kemp; Brian Dubal; Gus Duenas Subject: RE: TDC - Parking (Gravel Road) That will work for me Cheryl. The revised site plan (and landscape plan) will be included with my building permit submittal after SDR approval. Bill Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl @vlmk.com http://www.vlmk.com Original Message From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Friday,July 08, 2011 11:28 AM To: Gus Duenas; Bill Lambert Cc: Mike White; 'Karl Klokke'; Havlin Kemp; Brian Dubal Subject: RE: TDC - Parking (Gravel Road) Bill, As for a revised plan, I will probably condition that a revised plan (and CWS SPL- if you have it) be submitted for review prior to issuance of building/site permits. Thanks, Cheryl Original Message From: Gus Duenas Sent: Friday,July 08, 2011 11:05 AM To: Bill Lambert Cc: Mike White; Cheryl Caines; 'Karl Klokke'; Havlin Kemp; Brian Dubal Subject: RE:TDC- Parking (Gravel Road) Thanks, Bill. I'm out of the office today, but checking my emails from home. Thanks for resolving this issue. It looks fine to me. Gus From: Bill Lambert [billl @vlmk.com] Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 5:47 AM To: Gus Duenas Cc: Mike White; Cheryl Caines; 'Karl Klokke'; Havlin Kemp; Brian Dubal Subject: RE: TDC - Parking (Gravel Road) 1 Gus, Good morning. I have been working with our wetland consultant, CWS,Owner and neighbor to get a plan that works for everybody. I think we all agree on the attached revision. I have made these changes to my site plan that will be submitted for building permit once the SDR is approved. I hope this resolves this issue. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Bill Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl@ vlmk.com<mailto:Billl @vlmk.com> I http://www.vlmk.com<http://www.vlmk.com/> From: Gus Duenas [mailto:Gus @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Thursday,July 07, 2011 8:50 AM To: Bill Lambert Cc: Mike White Subject: RE: TDC- Parking (Power poles) Bill, There appears to be an issue with the owner of the property containing the billboards. His access to service the billboard (apparently once a month or so) is via the dirt road that is accessed from the parking lot of the TDC.The actual easement passes over wetlands. If you close the parking lot for access to the billboard, he has no way to get back there. Getting an access road through the wetland area could be a lengthy and costly process on his part and for very little benefit. In the interest of being neighborly and to allow for a win-win situation, you may want to resolve that issue with this owner by continuing to allow access through the parking lot. You'll probably lose one or two parking spots, or arrange for scheduled access if that is feasible. Our aerials over the years indicate that the access road has been used for 30 years or more. This is also in the interest of avoiding a potential appeal of your project. He has brought this issue to our attention and at this point we see it as a matter between property owners. However, he may be able to establish prescriptive rights to continue use of that access.This would require him to take it to court, which I'm sure nobody wants. Please look into this matter and let me know what transpires. Thanks. Gus [cid:image001.jpg @01CC3D32.8F023F10] From: Bill Lambert [mailto:billl @vlmk.com] Sent: Thursday,July 07, 2011 5:40 AM 2 To: Gus Duenas Cc: Mike White; Cheryl Caines Subject: RE: TDC- Parking (Power poles) Gus, Thank you for your time and consideration with this issue. I appreciate all your help. I will forward to the owner and let him know when the payment is due. Bill Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl@ vlmk.com<mailto:Billl @vlmk.com> I http://www.vlmk.com<http://www.vlmk.com/> From: Gus Duenas [mailto:Gus @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Wednesday,July 06, 2011 4:03 PM To: Bill Lambert Cc: Mike White; Cheryl Caines Subject: RE:TDC - Parking (Power poles) Bill, We typically compute the undergrounding along the entire length of the property line when the utility lines continue beyond the property as part of a continuing system. However, upon review, the last pole terminates in the location you show and the line to the billboard is a mere service line. We will stop the undergrounding computation with the last pole as you have indicated. Well accept the numbers as shown below and I'll revise the condition I have written to reflect that. The undergrounding fee-in-lieu payment needs to be made prior to final completion and approval of the improvements proposed for the project. It typically is paid prior to certificate of occupancy, but since you are not doing anything with the building, I will tie it to the proposed improvements. Gus [cid:image001.jpg @01CC3D32.8F023F10] From: Bill Lambert [mailto:billl @vlmk.com] Sent: Wednesday,July 06, 2011 2:51 PM To: Gus Duenas Subject: FW: TDC- Parking (Power poles) Gus, Good afternoon. I was curious if you have had a chance to review this email? We are getting close to submitting for building permits and I would like to get this issue resolved before then if possible. Thank you, 3 Bill Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl@ vlmk.com<mailto:Billl @vlmk.com> I http://www.vlmk.com<http://www.vlmk.com/> From: Bill Lambert Sent: Wednesday,June 15, 2011 7:13 AM To: Gus Duenas Cc: Karl Klokke; Havlin Kemp; Brian Dubai; Cheryl Caines; Jennifer Kimura Subject: TDC- Parking (Power poles) Gus, Good morning. I know that we have discussed the issue of the city requirement to underground the on-site utilities and based on my research of the costs, it has been decided that we will be paying the fee-in-lieu for the lines required. I have had several discussions with the owner about this issue and he does not want to pay for the lines that are feeding the billboards (A and B on the attached exhibit). As you can see in the attached photos, the power lines that serve the buildings stops at pole#8 (photo#3817) (photo#3814 is pole#9) and only a single power line goes from there to the other poles and finally to the billboards. I have drafted the attached exhibit to use in our discussion of what the city is going to require in terms of overall length of line that will be charged with the $35.00/foot. You had mentioned in your earlier email a distance of 1,060 I.f., but based on the notes above, we feel that the overall length should be 850.5' (from the SE property corner to pole#8). If that is acceptable, the fee for this should be 850.5 x$35.00 = $29,767.50. We understand that this fee will be paid prior to issuance of the PFI permit...correct? Can you please review this and let me know your thoughts? Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl@ vlmk.com<mailto:Billl @vlmk.com> I http://www.vlmk.com<http://www.vlmk.com/> DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 4 • CITY OF TIGARD 9/22/2011 9:24:29AM 13125 SW Hall Blvd. TIGARD Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 Conditions Associated With Case #: SDR2011-00002 Project Name: Tigard Distribution Center # DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS DATE SEVERITY APPLIED BY ACTION BY SERVICE PROVIDER LTR Met 8/17/11 Cheryl Caines Cheryl Caines 01. If discussions with the neighboring property owner include plan revisions, then the applicant shall submit the revised site plan for review and approval prior to issuance of site/building permits to ensure Tigard Community Development Code(TDC)standards are still satisfied. In addition, if the Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter is amended as part of these discussions, then a copy of the amended letter must also be submitted. s Q- REV SITE PLAN/WALKWAY CROSSING Met 8/17/11 Cheryl Caines Cheryl Caines 02. Prior to issuance of site/building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval that shows a walkway crossing a vehicular way that is a minimum of 4 feet wide and no longer than 36 feet. STREET TREES Met 8/19/11 Cheryl Caines Todd Prager 03. The applicant shall provide additional street trees along the eastern and western portion of the street frontage to meet the spacing requirements in section 18.745.040.C. PARKING LOT TREES Met 9/19/11 Cheryl Caines Todd Prager 04. The applicant shall provide additional parking lot trees within the front, middle, and back parking lots to meet the bone tree for every seven parking spaces, standard in section 18.745.050.E. TREE MITIGATION Met 8/19/11 Cheryl Caines Todd Prager 05. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit a mitigation plan to the City Arborist for review and approval. The plan must have a signature of approval from the project arborist certifying that it meets the requirements of 18.790.060(D)and that the species and placement of mitigation trees has been reasonably calculated to provide for their growth to maturity. The mitigation proposal shall show the species, location, and spacing of mitigation trees in relation to buildings, infrastructure,existing trees on adjacent sites, street trees, and each other. CASH ASSURANCE/TREE MITIGATION Not Met 8/6/11 Notice Cheryl Caines Shirley Treat 06. Prior to site work,the applicant shall submit a cash assurance(letter of credit or cash deposit)for the equivalent value of mitigation required(e.g. 136 caliper inches of proposed mitigation tree planting x$125/caliper inch).Any trees successfully planted on or off-site, in accordance with an approved Tree Mitigation Plan and TDC 18.790.060.D, will be credited against the assurance two years after all of the trees are planted. After the plan is approved and the trees are planted,the project arborist shall submit a letter to the City Arborist to certify that all of the mitigation trees were properly planted per the approved Tree Mitigation Plan in order to set the starting point of the two year tree establishment period. After the two year establishment period, the applicant shall provide a re-inventory of the mitigation trees conducted by a certified arborist in order to document mitigation tree survival, and compliance with the approved Tree Mitigation Plan. The remaining value of caliper inches not successfully mitigated shall be paid as a fee in-lieu of planting. Failure to plant and provide documentation of mitigation tree planting by the project arborist within 6 months of certificate of occupancy issuance shall result in the forfeiture of the cash assurance to the City6s tree fund. PUBLIC FACILITY IMPROVEMENT Not Met 8/6/11 Notice Gus Duenas Shirley Treat Page 1 of 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL " THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: Cheryl Caines 503-718-2437. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. If discussions with the neighboring property owner include plan revisions, then the applicant shall submit the revised site plan for review and approval prior to issuance of site/building 4, permits to ensure Tigard Community Development Code ('TISC) standards are still satisfied. In addition, if the Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter is amended as part of these discussions, then a copy of the amended letter must also be submitted. is.1$ea.0; ..N 3 4..t(( is-.V.) - c,...)s t tilt,. 2. Prior to issuance of site/building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site lan for review and approval that shows a walkway crossing a vehicular way that is a minimum of 4 feet wide and no longer than 36 feet. 3/ The applicant shall provide additional street trees along the eastern and western portion of the Mgr street frontage to meet the spacing requirements in section 18.745.040.C. ( The applicant shall provide additional parking lot trees within the front, middle,and back parking igh lots to meet the"one tree for every seven parking spaces" standard in section 18.745.050.E. 'V 4.. mg..' stet.+ L 44 `'Ic/t. QJJ ,w� w� 14 -I,�.e" c.�c,^eeiu, v5. Prior to issuance of the uildink permit, the applic nt shall submit a mitigation plan to the City MET arborist certifying.review and tpmeetsl the requirements have 18.790.0 0( of and that e from speces and placement of mitigation trees has been reasonably calculated to(p)provide for their species to maturity. The mitigation proposal shall show the species,location, and spacing of mitigation trees in relation to buildings,infrastructure,existing trees on adjacent sites,street trees,and each other. ? Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a cash assurance (letter of credit or cash deposit) for the equivalent value of mitigation required (e.g. 136 caliper inches of proposed mitigation tree 14-e Ki planting x $125/caliper inch). Any trees successfully planted on or off-site,in accordance with an approved Tree Mitigation Plan and TDC 18.790.060.D,will be credited against the assurance two °I years after all of the trees are planted. After the plan is approved and the y p pp a trees are planted, the 4,00,,,,, 1 project arborist shall submit a letter to the City Arborist to certify that all of the mitigation trees were properly planted per the approved Tree Mitigation Plan in order to set the starting point of the two year tree establishment period. After the two year establishment period, the applicant shall provide a re-inventory of the mitigation trees conducted by a certified arborist in order to document mitigation tree survival, and compliance with the approved Tree Mitigation Plan. The remaining value of caliper inches not successfully mitigated shall be paid as a fee in-lieu of planting. Failure to plant and provide documentation of mitigation tree planting by the project arborist within 6 months of certificate of occupancy issuance shall result in the forfeiture of the cash assurance to the City's tree fund. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following. requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,MENT,ATTN: GUS DUENAS 5033-639-4171, EXT 2470. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 7. Before any work commences on-site or on the public improvements, the applicant shall apply for and obtain a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit from the City to cover half-street improvements,sanitary sewer,easement restoration and any other work in the public right-of-way or easement The plans submitted shall include private water quality and detention facilities as part of the permit application. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans stamped by a professional engineer shall be submitted for review to the Development Engineer. NOM: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements and detention and water quality facilities that have to be inspected during construction and monitored afterwards. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans Lhhall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.tigard-or.gov). NOTICE TYPE H DECISION SDR2011-00002/TIGARD DISTRIB[TTION CEN'T'ER PAGE 2 OF 23 VLMK CONSULTING RECEIVES EEom 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4314 CITY � TIGARD www.vlmk.com OF ,,i-niGINEERINC • LETTER OF TRANSN�ITTA TO: City of Tigard - Planning Counter DATE: 8-30-11 13125 SW Hall Blvd. PROJECT: TDC Tigard, Oregon 97223 SDR2011-00002 ATTN: Cheryl Caines JOB NO: 210498 WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via: Delivery the following items: ❑ Drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Application for Payment ❑ Change order ❑ Specifications ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Samples ❑ Copies Date No. Description S� �O 1 Original Set of Plans DELIVERY SERVICE.INC. 1 Revised Set of Plans 022. S4 :41 ) THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Reviewed ❑ Submit additional copies for distribution ❑ For your use ❑ Rejected ❑ Resubmit copies for review ❑ As requested ❑ Revise and Resubmit ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ Make Corrections As Noted ❑ Prints returned after loan to us ❑ For Bids Due ❑ (Other) REMARKS Copy To: File Signed: Jennifer Kimura File: Document2 Page 1 of 1 Printed:August 30,2011 V L J%I K CONSULTING 503.222.4453 E N G I N E E R S 503.248.9263 vlmk @vlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 www.vlmk.com Tigard Distribution Center City Staff Report Response July 27, 2011 RECEIVED Response to City Staff Report JUL 2 9 2011 City of Tigard, Oregon CITY OF TIGARD PLANt■'1KG/ENGINEERING Project: Tigard Distribution Center (SDR2011-00002) Location: 8001-8005 SW Hunziker Road The following is in response to the city staff report dated July 21, 2011. Each item below corresponds to the number from the list of conditions: 1) (Plan revisions), The owner of this project and the neighbor (Keith Ashcraft) have come to an agreement that requires a small change to the north parking lot. We have revised the parking adjacent to the existing gravel road that leads to the existing billboard. We have revised the site plans and landscape plan to accommodate the change. This change has been reviewed by Clean Water Services and we have attached a copy of the approved revised Service Provider Letter. 2) (Pedestrian access), We have revised the site plan (G1.0) to indicate a new sidewalk adjacent to the existing public sidewalk and a striped path that is 5.0' • wide and 36.0' long. 3) (Street Trees), Two additional street trees have been added. The Queen Elizabeth Maple will have a 30' mature spread and are showing at 30' spacing, which conforms to Tigard Code section 18.745.050.C.2B. 4) (Parking lot trees), Additional parking lot trees have been added to provide the accurate distribution of 1 tree per 7 spaces. There are 24 new trees proposed and three existing trees for the total of 155 parking spaces. 5) (Tree Mitigation Plan), Per the email from Todd Prager (City Arborist), this issue has been resolved. Also, please see the landscape plan for mitigation information showing the in-lieu fee that is to be paid for the portion of trees removed that will not be mitigated. 6) (Mitigation Trees), Per Otten... 7) (PFI Permit), Private water quality and detention facilities are the only improvements on this project that apply to the PFI. Sheets that apply are G2.0, G3.0, G3.1 and G6.0. 8) (Legal name), The application for the PFI Permit has been completed with all legal names and applicants filled in correctly. 9) (Water Quality), Storm water calculations for water quality are provided in the included report. A proposed O&M plan is included as an attachment to the Storm water Report (see index). A maintenance proposal for the StormFilter water quality vault will also be submitted (Columbia Drain Co.). 10) (Storm Water Detention), Storm water calculations for detention are provided in the included report. A proposed O&M plan is included as an attachment to the Storm water Report (see index). 11) (Erosion Control Plan), An ESCP has been included that conforms to CWS standards. See Sheets G4.0, G4.1, G4.2 and G4.3. 12) (Service Provider Letter), The plans have been designed to comply with CWS. The only work we are doing in the buffer area (Vegetated Corridor) is enhanced File:G:\Acad2010\210498\Permits\03 Site Development Review\Staff-Report-Response-1.doc Page 1 of 2 Printed:July 27,2011 Tigard Distribution Center City Staff Report Response landscaping. We are not doing any work in the wetland. There are no easements required for this area. 13) (Construction Plan), Construction vehicle plans are outlined in the ESCP sheets. See Sheets G4.1 and G4.2. Also, this project will be constructed by a General Contractor located in Boise Idaho with subs from the local area. Once that contractor is under contract, he will be responsible for construction vehicle access and parking. This will be coordinated with the city engineer's approval. File: G:\Acad2010\210498\Permits\03 Site Development Review\Staff-Report-Response-1.doc Page 2 of 2 Printed: July 27,2011 . Glean Wate%Services Our co-nmitment 's clear. CWS File Number AMENDED Service Provider Letter 09-000047 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R&O 07-20). Jurisdiction: Tigard Review Type: No Impact SPL Original Date: May 13, 2011 Site Address 8001 SW Hunziker ST SPL Amendment Date: July 27, 2011 /Location: Tigard, OR 97223 SPL Expiration Date: May 12, 2013 Applicant Information: Owner Information: Name JENNIFER KIMURA Name KARL KLOOKE Company VLMK CONSULTING ENGINEERS Company Address 3933 SW KELLY AVENUE Address 1109 N 21ST STREET PORTLAND, OR 97239 PORTLAND, OR 97239 Phone/Fax Phone/Fax E-mail: E-mail: Tax lot ID Development Activity 25101 BD00200 Parking Lot Expansion Pre-Development Site Conditions: Post Development Site Conditions: Sensitive Area Present: X On-Site X Off-Site Sensitive Area Present. X On-Site X Off-Site Vegetated Corridor Width: Variable: 9-25 Vegetated Corridor Width: Variable; 9-25 Vegetated Corridor Condition: Degraded Enhancement of Remaining Vegetated Corridor Required: X Square Footage to be enhanced: 1,588 Encroachments into Pre-Development Vegetated Corridor: Type and location of Encroachment: Square Footage: None 0 Mitigation Requirements: Type/Location Sq. Ft./Ratio/Cost No Mitigation Required 0 .X Conditions Attached 51 i Development Figures Attached (4) Planting Plan Attached Geotech Report Required This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. 09-000047 CWS File Number In order to comply with Clean Water Services water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: 1. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area or Vegetated Corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed in R&O 07-20, Chapter 3. 2. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the Vegetated Corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the Vegetated Corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by R&O 07-20, Section 3.06.1 and per approved plans. 3. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide Clean Water Services or its designee (appropriate city) with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. No Activity Authorized. 4. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon. 5. Prior to ground disturbance, an Erosion Control Permit is required from the City. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's)for Erosion Control, in accordance with Clean Water Services' Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual, shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 6. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from Clean Water Services or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. 7. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 5.10. 8. Removal of native, woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable. 9. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by Clean Water Services,the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 10. For Vegetated Corridors up to 50 feet wide, the applicant shall enhance the entire Vegetated Corridor to meet or exceed good corridor condition as defined in R&O 07-20, Section 3.14.2, Table 3-3. 11. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the applicant shall provide the City with a Vegetated Corridor enhancement/restoration plan. Enhancement/restoration of the Vegetated Corridor shall be provided in accordance with R&O 07-20, Appendix A, and shall include planting specifications for all Vegetated Corridor, including any cleared areas larger than 25 square feet in Vegetated Corridor rated "good." 12. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the Vegetated Corridor shall be removed per methods described in Clean Water Services' Integrated Pest Management Guide, 2009. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native tree and shrub species. 13. The City or Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of enhancement/restoration activities. Enhancement/restoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements (R&0 07-20, Appendix A). 14. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 2.11.2. If at any time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80%survival level, the owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the two-year maintenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting. 09-000047 CWS File Number 15. Performance assurances for the Vegetated Corridor shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 2.06.2, Table 2-1 and Section 2.10, Table 2-2. 16. Clean Water Services and the City shall require an easement over the Vegetated Corridor conveying storm and surface water management to Clean Water Services or the City that would prevent the owner of the Vegetated Corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor and any easements therein. FINAL PLANS 17. Final construction plans shall include landscape plans. In the details section of the plans, a description of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution, condition and size of plantings, existing plants and trees to be preserved, and installation methods for plant materials is required. Plantings shall be tagged for dormant season identification and shall remain on plant material after planting for monitoring purposes. 18. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on final plans including methods, responsible party contact information, and dates (minimum two times per year, by June 1 and September 30). 19. Final construction plans shall clearly depict the location and dimensions of the sensitive area and the Vegetated Corridor(indicating good, marginal, or degraded condition). Sensitive area boundaries shall be marked in the field. 20. Protection of the Vegetated Corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provided by the installation signage between the development and the outer limits of the Vegetated Corridors. Signage details to be included on final construction plans. This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-approved site plan is attached. Please call (503) 681-3653 with any questions. Amber Wierck Environmental Plan Review Attachments (4) 09-000047 CWS File Number Ock i. �,1 , ,4P / � a as M TTT in Kai EA Mt c, / .1 WETLAND CONTINUESOHSITE 0+. .• 1 . ,,t.... . . ... ., "--\ 1 ElaliEllE9 80 DARY .: /y•` .' •• �' .. -'`j� ' ' ii■....■. �. [�e` f 479, • 7� `Iti�I�y _iii me : IIU olio, ::: .. •a +�'ti lil 1l ui a. 1 ::*'�~ n■ ■. n. IC El iii ( Ill li �e .,. .�. n + J n■ e. i■ u ■■ ■n to CI le iiiIIIIIIiiirei 11' SL. ,.■■.. .••• • . •..s, r,. 4 I iii E, 11 3 i `' !'fir i i 1 ( ( ! illi:!A1':'t 31 2/ i". "" '.41' s — ^� yg.e A q L!-..1 ..1 1,i . 1 1 ! i i {BL�Jir•:, .exti R.e�1+r.J 'IF _ ��. i--.E1 -B '-4 4...) _ Date ? ,� .e'– l EXIST, DEVE' ENT if 0 POT COMMUNITY A g':%,... ,,,�.'PLANT COMMUNITY S LL Q. 0 -60 a`J 4- (166 SNQ009 AC) •::::;.•_•.:5,M, (657 SH0.02AC) Approved HERBACEOUS/DEGRADED `•?fir:•;'":?r,,r, DEGRADED Clean W_ater services PLANT COMMUNITY B I• WETLAND DATA PI INTS��C� r'( y�y Re +E`� :::::::; H osc IMALAYAN LA A N B o VEGETATION DATA PINTS '...1 HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY! , r7__ b• Date Slf 3//1 �� DEGRADED I PHOTODDCUMENTAMION•P S(' c- /{i i.44Md.►JT I Of 3 4/.1/11 Detail of Plant Communities A, B, and C at the Tigard Distributior FIGURE +773 Center on Hunziker Road in Tigard, Oregon. Base mad provided by VLNK Consulting Engineers, 2011.1. 2/-\ ,, -sr 1 s (1 Pacific Habitat Services.Inc. 09-000047 CWS File Number ••.6' • 11/ •/:e- r / • ,, • ..' • ..ati ../. , - 7- 1 - WETLAND CONTINUES OFFSITE .-..7 .... ,:,..,:.::„...: ..........g.i, 1,. . . . . . . . . • •••••••••• ••• .../Ve Illi I•••••–•%. VS. QT. . . - *CORRIDOR T UNin lir MEW' • ' • 1. „zee „ , , . ...,... • ,, , , .• • „r../.'''' ,,". ' • ■ ----- i 1 ....... , ,r, 1 P" _.5 16- 's 0••• ' , ,i ir. 11 ttri I iit 00 i 4/, 4i- ••,- /VEGETATE ,r 1 t.......-0, . Ilie-11 411.7. i',.-4./ . CORRJDO , ;, ' --. ---1-- _- - j ...... #(,f-e. .,-. -,-'''•-•-e'—'80UNDA ' .,4. \-f • •-- i• 1 A •IIII -LI-•• • IN ...... 7 •I• I •• BIS :III. i i :: 11: ::: -= ' I I . • 14 'I I 11. • SIM •OM • •• •I• •I• •IIII •• •/• III :I: 1: 14: = ••• Ill• •I• •I• MI lig . ... y• ." i 111 / ,•;er; ' ,, •• SIM •-• MIMI 1.'11 /• •■• OM 16,111 •/• •• •I• MINI am sit •• WIN SIM OM VIM MID ...: l ".a . . . II4 •I• •110 •• IIII• •• •III nil. WE \ f 4. :•,,,,, i!1 •,. •i• .11 BIII •• BIM •I• / S MO NIB 111'• IS SPIN VIII •I• MIS ■-.....- . • SIM •111. CS IS •II •IIII II• •• "IPA \\\\...(.....c. MIR SIM •• I If• •111 SIC ••• ::: = • a . ...A... iiiiiiiiiiiiiii ........ .h.r. I — i • J... l•••211.1 kil . 11 4.,,ii* III • ! , i i ! , , li,..„... ..• ,, • 1, 11111H 111-:\ — • 4— ' e i 71.....• DORI i 1 ! , . • gy ---,, / outriNG DEI.OPMElitt_.__ _ . • S 1*1$11WP D 1_011IMENT ....... -..:- -:*- 1/ ,-.---- ....., .... 1-- — . f' • —ir —MI•■•■ON IMO ■■-■m ni.low..se arm mw■-lor 11•0•••••••1 I=••••■-■, ••••111 EXI ING DEVELOPMENT-IN.- , .... , ... - ....., . ---... 05ROXIMAtE--'3 - . -'--c______, . - ----- -,..Q. APPROXIMA ...... - , ETLAND -- WETLAND •... '‘. CORRIDOR . 1V VEGETATED OUNDARY- ''. . ---BOLINCIARY t, / _ ... proved ( .. ONSITE ONsrrE WETLAND 1:.:::::::::::.::::.::.::.:::.::.: (2,028 SF/0.05 AC) Clean 4:ter Services ct- " -A-3foralt. stot 111- BY_A.-) )alkaiLiAL \\,.. . , ONSITE VEGETATED CORfrEfor \-.... . ... ._. .. .•. .•._. :::::::::.•:...:::: (4,767:1.SF/0.04 AC) ., o Li - z- --------, ---1 1,588 MNMII7 MINI RI.Number / : ——4-•-- �P S1, , A' •,,t•A„I. f'/-„,”,X x. 1 /' O • i�)TYP. ,.i ti •/ (- ' b •A. . 4'IlI t ' M`! I `fl :1SI!ul N' a R a ~ .I' G-0. _ __ / \ d • s ..I 1 j s ' � K,: i+ r i /15.5' - -- _- � 15.5' 26.0' LI! a `r r©_7J' �b: '�— — _ F' ' r n l O O r p ,� of l 6.7 ' 1'1'' tIt1\�'�t11,1' N N I a �: ----- 1' ,s,'\'1�?.''i'tt‘.%:a'1,\\ ',•CO a V r v-gQ -'__ i ©TYP. , ` t1 ,1 < 4 a ▪I ,'li '0 1t 11 1 `I i 41' [Liill) ' m fn II 0 \t en ,!1',1 1'.'fit''- '. :• ., L ler• 2.—ill 1• 1 4191 I I{I 4 ir7 f, I I ;n L �.� I�; a t ,t: J TYP.I© ,i �1� \ '� I 4,-.% b l 1•,11tt,`11 •,t \'N 11. \•''. 1.',1+ 1 iltipl - • 0 * ''I -'.mi4 ` III — :1 11},1\A'i t • t•t•11,11' it 1' i.'':�• . , , f. I {.I J,,f +- i, '••. It_••••••,....... .tail.: 0' —d• .- -- 1 f a I'' 1,\\,;',%..\44;i., ,l ,\ II Q EXISTING OFF-SI . " ea�lrater .ervices S.\1!':! `! 1\ , ' 1' 1'' Q DEVELOPMENT i E.J ‘a4) ,►rtt �J a ..� 1 •\ - ,; . -' "!i�, ,\ 1 1 I //�� rr , '\•,1 , ..\ , ,, , %1 1 „... , 1:,v r�-t rr� }v e-,-/t r.'-,Z ;-tom-: .c is. —�.. K- ." . , ...j 5r IV 0" KOr� 3 C t \/0 EXIS'ING GRAVEL ROAD 10 REMAIN. STOP CONCRETE CURB ON EACH SIDE AND PROVIDE STRIPED AREA (NO PARKING) FOR ACCESS TO GRAVEL ROAD. 1 TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER .e. i I J / I . 1 , °;� ,,_ / _= ts id / 1 �/ WATER QUALITY ,' / / i ( SEED MIX ` 4 A R,r i: i ----- -- :1 8-RP:, 0o _.�►V I; V.fto,..0L" - 7 -4-- -:':::::: ;7 P';-t:. ;r:044,e., . - .4 D� a � �� _ mss,N:7:3_1 ___ ,,.* .i„,._p_ift_I _.::_ " , - . . . 1 tettAll,.1) / : 1 -Is - ,- IZZ- ,IKV-4- .. 14 -CS -,. ...,,,...:0 lets I r „ill s II v-; " �, ►a 8,-MAC 5 -MAC " .° �0 / - 20 -SA �I r tp� �- o f LARGE BOULDER - 4 n • a ! (REUSE EXISTING) +� a I I y N l 111144/ z i L •. 1 �� BARK MULCH 6 -1/TS 4tefaL i i air , i . 1 / 4t. 1 ' ' 22 C f M* c6r.d + . AS CrLi' -1"4 Tree Preservation, Inc. 4018 N.Colonial Ave.I Portland,OR 97227 503.704.8024 I wwwovedooktree.com LICENSED,BONDED&INSURED CCB#176365 CERTIFIED ARBORIST PN-0742AT May 9, 2011 Reference: Tigard Distribution Center Location: 8001 SW Hunziker Rd. Tigard, OR Contact: Mr. Bill Lambert VLMK Consulting Engineers I have reviewed the tree preservation site plan and approve of the changes. If you require further technical assistance, please feel free to contact me at 503-704-8024. Sincerely, Kevin MacKenzie Overlook Tree Preservation, INC. Certified Arborist # PN-0742AT CCB#176365 • Cheryl Caines From: Todd Prager . Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:00 AM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: FW:TDC Parking (Updated site plan) Attachments: Approval-Letter-1.pdf From: Bill Lambert [mailto:billl @vlmk.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 12:21 PM To: Todd Prager Cc: Cheryl Caines Subject: RE: TDC Parking (Updated site plan) Todd, Will this letter work for your requirement from the Arborist? If so,we will include it in our submittal package. Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers ' 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl@vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com From: Todd Prager jmailto:todd @tigard-or.govl Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 11:21 AM To: Cheryl Caines; Bill Lambert Subject: RE: TDC Parking (Updated site plan) Hi all, There needs to be evidence that the project arborist has reviewed and approved the tree preservation site plan. In the past there have been issues when this has not occurred. The easiest way to resolve this is by having the arborist signature on the plan. Alternatively, you could have the arborist sign electronically, or provide a statement that he has reviewed and approved the tree preservation sheet XX dated XX-XX-XXXX. The most important thing is that the specifications in the arborist report are reflected on the plans. For example if the arborist says the tree protection fence should be 20 feet from a tree, the plans need to reflect that to scale. Thanks, Todd ' From: Cheryl Caines Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 8:42 AM To: Bill Lambert; Todd Prager Subject: RE: TDC Parking (Updated site plan) 1 Bill, I'm forwarding your question to Todd Prager, the City Arborist. This is ultimately his call. Cheryl From: Bill Lambert f mailto:billl @vlmk.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 5:12 AM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: RE: TDC Parking (Updated site plan) Cheryl, Good morning. I am getting started on adding the tree numbers to my site plan that correspond with the Arborist's report. His report describes each tree and the numbers will be shown on my plan, but why does he need to sign my plan (as you noted below),when we are not going to sign our drawings for design review submittal? Getting Kevin (Arborist) in to the office is not easy because he is out in the field a lot. I would prefer to submit his report along with my plan...no signatures. Is that acceptable? Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR ( 97239-4393 ' P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl @vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com From: Cheryl Caines fmailto:cherylc@tigard-or.govj Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 3:04 PM To: Bill Lambert Cc: Todd Prager Subject: RE: TDC Parking (Updated site plan) The code requires it be prepared by a certified arborist. As part of his/her report,the arborist will list the tree species, size, and condition. That will help our arborist tell if and how much mitigation is actually required. You can identify the trees on your plan, but the numbering needs to coincide with the arborist report and the plans showing protection and/or mitigation need to be signed by the arborist. Cheryl From: Bill Lambert fmailto:billl @vlmk.comj Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 1:06 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: RE: TDC Parking (Updated site plan) ▪ Cheryl, . Good afternoon. I have been reading through the list of requirements in the pre-application notes and I have a question about the arborist. It states that we are required to prepare a tree preservation plan and it needs to be done by a certified arborist. 1 2 1) Are we required to hire a professional arborist or can we simply show the trees to be removed on our site plan and grading plan and indicate the notes/details required for those that we are keeping? I don't want to have our • client go to the expense of another consultant if it is not required. Thank you, Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR I 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 bill)@vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com From: Cheryl Caines f mailto:cherylc @tigard-or.govl Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:34 AM To: Bill Lambert Subject: RE: TDC Parking (Updated site plan) Bill, The Tree Preservation Plan can be combined with the Site Plan. The City Arborist also asks that you also show the trees on the grading plan to ensure adequate protection of trees to be retained. Looking over the revised plan. It appears that you are outside of the large wetland on the adjacent property and only portions of the buffer may be affected by the project. As for the small wetlands in the clump of trees just north of the site and the rail spur east of the site, please be aware that if any work is proposed within these wetlands a Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) may be required. If the work in the wetland meets the jurisdictional requirements and permit • criteria of the Corps, DSL,CWS, and other agencies,then it does not require a SLR (TDC 18.775.020.D). The other thing is I didn't know the floodplain came that far into the site. Please also note that work within the floodplain requires a SLR. The type depends on the amount of ground disturbance in the floodplain. 10-50 cubic yards is a Type I. 50 plus is a Type III. Do you know how many cubic yards of disturbance or alteration there will be? Cheryl From: Bill Lambert jmailto:billl @vlmk.coml Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 9:22 AM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: TDC Parking (Updated site plan) Cheryl, Good morning. I thought I would send you an updated site plan (attached)for reference. I am waiting for the owner to give his final approval of this plan, but I think it is very close. Some of the changes: 1) We have located the wetlands on the adjacent site and added the CWS buffers. 2) We moved the truck turnaround to be completely on our site (not in the easement). 3) We revised the parking lots on both ends to try and gain some parking, meet landscaping 15%and push the bulk of the landscaping to the front of the building(more parking in the back). Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, 3 Bill G. Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 billl @vlmk.com I htto://www.vlmk.com DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules"City General Records Retention Schedule." 4 Cheryl Caines From: Todd Prager . Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 9:56 AM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: RE:Tigard Distribution Center The signature was sent as a separate email correspondence earlier in the process. I'll forward it to you. -Todd From: Cheryl Caines Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 9:47 AM To: Todd Prager Subject: Tigard Distribution Center Todd, You said the arborist signature condition for mitigation has been met. I'm not seeing the signature on the plans. I'm wondering if the signature got lost in the replacement pages. Will you stop by and take a look at the plans? Thanks, Cheryl DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules"City General Records Retention Schedule." 1 A III CITY OF TIGARL RECEIPT a 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 JI( A 1:ID Receipt Number: 187157 - 06/13/2012 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID SDR2011-00002 Tree Replacement Cash Assur 260-0000-22000 $17,000.00 Total: $17,000.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 003225 CCAINES 06/13/2012 $17,000.00 Payor: Deering Management Group, Inc. Total Payments: $17,000.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 CleanWater Services RECEIVED JUL 2 5 2012 July 24, 2012 PIANNI G ENG NE D ERING BILL LAMBERT VLMK CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3933 SW KELLY AV PORTLAND OR 97239 RE: Utility Construction (Light Post) CWS file 09-000047 (Tax map 2S101 BD Tax lot 00200) Clean Water Services has received your site plan for the construction of a 24- inch diameter light post at the subject tax lot. Per Section 3,05.5,c, placement of the light post within the Vegetated Corridor is allowed without replacement mitigation. Please attach this letter to the existing Service Provider Letter (CWS File No. 09-000047) to demonstrate compliance with Resolution and Order 07- 20. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect Sensitive Areas if they are subsequently identified on your site. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 681-3639. Sincerely, "___—(aGlec' 177,, LLaurie Harris Environmental Plan Review Attachment(1) 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax; (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org Al 7 ., I 1 Bs ASP 41. i El 1 1 I 1 --1---- S 1I = 1---"Li I tii1 1 tenit---i'tk 3Ex I 7111 i f , Yj ;li ar --- I fi Approved f 1 s s f ADP : F, 1 Clean Water 1 t t gy /- 1� Dated z4 /z t iit -. I ' - --"-- . ,M-- -4U1 Ad 5r(- A r� -— - ) 1._ - AID t28' il This light pole is \ h 1 Existing s j in the "buffer" ! wetland / p I area that stops /� at the edge of " ' /4.- exist. development lJ - ~-ter "3 • 24 intro ct"A elcr 1 �,A 3 �' 1 r .—.....n.........,....., ,• ... i S , p,,,,, te)y�?Ch 1,1/ _ vgir t yr 5hial ix- 0 r Cheryl Caines From: Cheryl Caines Sent: Wednesday,July 25, 2012 10:54 AM To: 'Bill Lambert' Cc: Jennifer Kimura; Havlin Kemp Subject: RE:TDC - Parking (Light pole) Thanks Bill. This is not a Tigard significant wetland, but I'll put a copy in the land use file. Cheryl From: Bill Lambert fmailto:billl vlmk.coml Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:14 AM To: Cheryl Caines Cc: Jennifer Kimura; Havlin Kemp Subject: FW: TDC - Parking (Light pole) Cheryl, Good morning. You may not have been aware of this issue, but the question came up at the site about the new light pole being located in the wetland buffer. I discussed this with Laurie at CWS and as you can see by the email below,they have approved its location and the required work in the buffer. CWS's approval letter is attached and I have updated the latest service provider letter(SPL) with this approval for your file. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you, Bill Lambert VLMK Consulting Engineers From: Laurie Harris fmailto:HarrisLACIeanWaterServices.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 4:03 PM To: Bill Lambert Cc: Amber Wierck Subject: RE: TDC - Parking (Light pole) Hello Bill, Please see attached documentation for the proposed light pole construction associated with the parking lot improvements approved through CWS File No. 09-000047. Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions. Thanks, Laurie Harris Development Services Plan Review Clean Water Services 2550 Southwest Hillsboro Highway 1 Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 ph: (503)681-3639 fax: (503) 681-4439 e-mail: harrisl@cleanwaterservices.org From: Amber Wierck [mailto:WierckA©CleanWaterServices.orq] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 9:53 AM To: Laurie Harris Subject: FW: TDC - Parking (Light pole) From: Bill LambertjSMTP:BILLL@VLMK.COM.I Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 9:52:31 AM To: Amber Wierck Subject: TDC - Parking (Light pole) Auto forwarded by a Rule Amber, Good morning. It has been awhile since we last talked. I hope all is good with you. This project (located at 8001 SW Hunziker Road in Tigard) is now under construction and a question has come up regarding the new light poles. As you can see on the attached partial site lighting plan (Crop-E1.0), we are proposing to install a new light pole in the existing buffer area around the off-site wetland. We are also proposing some new landscaping in the same area (see attached crop-L1.0). I assume that this would fall under enhancements and/or maintenance? Is this acceptable to CWS or do we need to move the light pole out of the buffer? If you could review this and get back to me (call with any questions), I would appreciate it. Thank you, Bill Lambert I Associate VLMK Consulting Engineers 3933 SW Kelly Avenue I Portland, OR 1 97239-4393 P 503.222.4453 I F 503.248.9263 I M 503.580.0812 bill)@vlmk.com I http://www.vlmk.com 2 CleanWater\ Services Our Lonnniunl nl i. It r CWS File Number AMENDED Service Provider Letter 09-000047 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R&O 07-20). Jurisdiction: Tigard Review Type: No Impact SPL Original Date: May 13,2011 Site Address 8001 SW Hunziker ST SPL Amendment Date: July 27, 2011 I Location: Tigard, OR 97223 SPL Expiration Date: May 12,2013 Applicant Information: Owner Information: Name JENNIFER KIMURA Name KARL KLOOKE Company VLMK CONSULTING ENGINEERS Company Address 3933 SW KELLY AVENUE Address 1109 N 21ST STREET PORTLAND,OR 97239 PORTLAND,OR 97239 Phone/Fax Phone/Fax E-mail: E-mail: Tax lot ID Development Activity 25101 BD00200 Parking Lot Expansion Pre-Development Site Conditions: Post Development Site Conditions: Sensitive Area Present: © On-Site © Off-Site Sensitive Area Present: © On-Site © Off-Site Vegetated Corridor Width: Variable; 9-25 Vegetated Corridor Width: Variable;9-25 Vegetated Corridor Condition: Degraded Enhancement of Remaining Vegetated Corridor Required: © Square Footage to be enhanced: 1,588 Encroachments into Pre-Development Vegetated Corridor: Type and location of Encroachment: Square Footage: None _0 Mitigation Requirements: Type/Location Sq. Ft./Ratio/Cost No Mitigation Required 0 © Conditions Attached © Development Figures Attached(4) ❑Planting Plan Attached ❑Geotech Report Required This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. Page 1 of 7 09-000047 CWS File Number In order to comply with Clean Water Services water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: 1. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area or Vegetated Corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed in R&O 07-20, Chapter 3. 2. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the Vegetated Corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the Vegetated Corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by R&O 07-20, Section 3.06.1 and per approved plans. 3. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL)and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide Clean Water Services or its designee (appropriate city) with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. No Activity Authorized. 4. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade. or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon. 5. Prior to ground disturbance, an Erosion Control Permit is required from the City. Appropriate Best Management Practices(BMP's)for Erosion Control, in accordance with Clean Water Services' Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual, shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 6. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from Clean Water Services or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. 7. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 5.10. 8. Removal of native, woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable. 9. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by Clean Water Services, the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 10. For Vegetated Corridors up to 50 feet wide, the applicant shall enhance the entire Vegetated Corridor to meet or exceed good corridor condition as defined in R&O 07-20, Section 3.14.2, Table 3-3. 11. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction,the applicant shall provide the City with a Vegetated Corridor enhancement/restoration plan. Enhancement/restoration of the Vegetated Corridor shall be provided in accordance with R&O 07-20, Appendix A, and shall include planting specifications for all Vegetated Corridor, including any cleared areas larger than 25 square feet in Vegetated Corridor rated "good." 12. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the Vegetated Corridor shall be removed per methods described in Clean Water Services' Integrated Pest Management Guide, 2009. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native tree and shrub species. 13. The City or Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of enhancement/restoration activities. Enhancement/restoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements(R&0 07-20, Appendix A). 14. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 2.11.2. If at any time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80% survival level,the owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the two-year maintenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting. Page 2 of 7 09-000047 CWS File Number 15. Performance assurances for the Vegetated Corridor shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 2.06.2, Table 2-1 and Section 2.10, Table 2-2. 16. Clean Water Services and the City shall require an easement over the Vegetated Corridor conveying storm and surface water management to Clean Water Services or the City that would prevent the owner of the Vegetated Corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor and any easements therein. FINAL PLANS 17. Final construction plans shall include landscape plans. In the details section of the plans, a description of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution, condition and size of plantings, existing plants and trees to be preserved, and installation methods for plant materials is required. Plantings shall be tagged for dormant season identification and shall remain on plant material after planting for monitoring purposes. 18. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on final plans including methods, responsible party contact information, and dates(minimum two times per year, by June 1 and September 30). 19. Final construction plans shall clearly depict the location and dimensions of the sensitive area and the Vegetated Corridor(indicating good. marginal, or degraded condition). Sensitive area boundaries shall be marked in the field. 20. Protection of the Vegetated Corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provided by the installation signage between the development and the outer limits of the Vegetated Corridors. Signage details to be included on final construction plans. This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-approved site plan is attached. Please call (503) 681-3653 with any questions. Amber Wierck Environmental Plan Review Attachments (4) Page 3 of 7 09-000047 CWS File Number (✓5\ 1 DV94/ .. y. / • ■ ee w lie • G 4.. /' SCALE IN PEM? •cP �,5 �, WETLAND CONTINUES OFFSITE O�F,� �,r ' i i;:, c:�:"? •. :ayhETANp:.::;:.:i / Ali..., [11 . r�®i:�li�.®r : .' II �.- TED / 11 0• yy/I . ARY•. /� i›..... - lord • ,l:` 'II / .u'...u. Vi a: . .. \ % I r ' r ( aii ii i i ■'■ ■u 45:1:. rep. j ■u u. •• •1■ •I• iii iii 11111 •'• I, i ( MIN■ •I• ■1■ WE •I• •I• �,i •1• ■ ■1■ um ■ I me e m 4rP SLOPES_.If _N T � i ��.1 s i 1 1 i ! I 1 0 �_� ilium Ap• oved I ^- ].ee0A 1 � {1t..t4Jx 1 ‘,.:,..._:-- illyi EXISTING DEVEL ENT 1 of if --- ..— —.«.. .......«« �...yr ,,,.ewe.^...+......+---.... V. J PLANT COMMUNITY A ;:;PLANT COMMUNITY S Fit.1 Q a. 0 006-14- (165 5F/0.004 AC) : (657 SH0,02 AC) r HERBACEOUS/DEGRADED .....:. :DEGRADED Approved PLANT COMMUNITY B I. WETLAND DATA INTS Clean Wager Services (850 SP/0.02 AC) �p�ErJJl oNvt E�v�f�RE 1_ . HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY/ 0 VEGETATION DAT (1INTS�d_ '— ,_Date (13 A 1 DEGRADED i PHOTODOCUM vss iOPNT�`Mfd Sr I- 4r- +IME•Jr- / df3 1. 4/11/11 Detail of Plant Communities A, B, and C at the Tigard Distribution FIGURE Fr 4773 Center on Hunziker Road in Tigard, Oregon. Base map provided 2,A ?� by VLMK Consulting Engineers, 2011. Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Y.AUTOCA0N700N7l) OC611VIG 2 uI0 41.1g..u.11a.e4/12R01111O11l MI.LAW 1.1 , . . I 09-000047 I CWS File Number 1949.° .■.r 41-/ / . % 1 ,.//, (t. , . /4 I - WETLAND CONTINUES OFFSITE # ....e;' ' ...', . . . ............. 0+ , 4" ....., . v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,../ //7. # 1.41' • • • • • • 'In -' • —11 • - • • • - t• •-• ' • • - .111 • • • i f L . • vicrr VORIUDOK SY IDOSTIVG Priory • e Aii . ..„.(p+ ..,. , .... , , . . • ,•••:'./- At, /... . ,, Cr ''V' ,6' 1 . --- --N 11 . -.....4),, ,.4„../.. ;Ar.., 11 PAIP,! I?0 iii 1 o•VEGETAT&D 0 ). `Z..I.Jr 12.j! INCI5/1. . -4 • ty , mese-mos/ --- • 'sir i I ,• t,: _CORRIDOrt, ____ '.- '.. • //,1;- '-,23'-.-:i.."-<-:----BoyNDA Yi ...., . ,.. ic — me am •• IN —sin :2.1 , -4."i 0.1 . 1 we as a• ex •I• In Ifr.• Ill •I• •t• dB . mos .. spa .1.. e;54 r I i i . 1 MIN III OM 111: •MIR GIN •• •I •11111 :11: 1:11: :: :11: •• ••4 I 1 ( I •I• •• •• SID •• ' I / . --... i. ,_:[,._ .. ... ... .. •• .•••I• ••• tom mow Vt /ell, 11 f 11 ••:.• .•:: .11: .11111: :..• LI.• ,111.1: mi. •I• Ulu •• •I• •.• •I• Ell •I• LI, 1 •I• OM 8• •I• •• VIE •I• MIN It i.::.. -., I, ... man ura aim wo •IN Nun win • "— U.S ma •• ••• •• am um IS w• am •si mu •• 515 Iline •15 • ilk,. •:'..;;Q:',;., , -•• • I I 711,,,, .C$1111•144 . ilk . I i I ' WO* ......S. .... j ..........I. . TRUNCA SY ----, I •• •.• — ; ••••• . po It 4 Cliiill I Alit\- -1.,./ ... ....) , ___i •II •I• Egli' 111111111H11111111L••• l I I "" 7)1i .. ■... ---. -N.\ -- Akili 1 X ITI 4. prt 14_0111 ENT , . ..., (.. ...____. ----___-- , . ,. Ira..i:........ . ...,—i.... ........--.......——............. N 7. --e---EXI ING DE4'ELOPMENT %-...... .. rateri.i.11. 111E1............/...“.••••••••1.1•■•••; . - ..................... - . ... • OPROX.-.... APPROXIMA IMATE---fr.....--- ` -- —- . --- >c,., VEGETATED IVETU‘ND ------- .. WETLAND , CORRIDOR OUNDARY--"- -.. , \---ILINCIARY ...„. d• ., ,.. • ''proved Can '.1 ter Services II ( t............. ONSITE WETLAND A)i- (2,028 SF/0.05 AC) At- tad - BY.A..0.._ ArrA^of AL. AA I I I .., \\\N :......-.:-.:.;. ONSITE VEGETATED CORWO1R *get. 4471) ..A41"jr :•i:-.••••::-:': (+7672-SP/0.04 AC) \ ... Page 5 of 7 09-000047 CWS File Number v e r y•.• r r ,......„ ,y,:: • ........1, 7' 'i l� '' `e‘1111111' ) ° At•.� „(1.1]::”a • 'i'l o In U Off; ii, , ._ -77___ �a F4 1 l '"' ,il�� �''i� �ja! ■o '� 7 : 4,-.1,;*"' 26.0' VELE= • 'tr. Ilii}tiF 6.4' , b i 1 �i c !, % r 'I'� "i; CO a ,) r i- ©�. • 1 a'T °.'' 1 r ,, 'L '4ri �_ 4 . ''il o Y,,, ,! I,h�' fIl, .N _ �T it.. l $ J Li �. { o i < 4:►•i.l 111 'l # 'I, Ai 'i © �; ti 11 1,. TYP. +'' ':ti: 18.0' I , fl .� ,rte' 'r A '� i (0 i 5.7 ► , — �� I 1,l{!+1I,! 1 r 'I , ./ ., ,. iiiiii,, ! r • �jt iI`!I I: I ;1!'t 3 I:.' I':i•I'-.�-- •• na.' -I 1' .w�1!' i I I'� ''i .I ',1, ',!• wrru+aw.........r .. EXISTING OFF-SI :,•'an\Mater .•Mces DEVELOPMENT Ti EN +t�l. �+]i •••3 r'r ,:,/F l!!I Al i:l'4' 3 Of ® EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD TO REMAIN. STOP CONCRETE CURB ON EACH SIDE / AND PROVIDE STRIPED AREA (NO PARKING) FOR ACCESS TO GRAVEL ROAD. 1 / TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER "`(((\e /'' \. i ■ 11_ / i � , // WATER QUALITY ,' / / ; / SEED MIX ' / 6 -PM �. /1 / // r-- 0= 4 A R- .64„_,„ _.. ,.w. / ,'∎®9 .�'ll� V - - 1 8 -R P gwojilliiii- ..".- ,,r • z•------:-.---:' -.: "'IV .Ty ] - 'a` tit .A V i i 4 • ily) / ,„/ , ,,,,,, , ,_ / 8 ' MAC � �, o -- - s ' ._ • -- 5 -MAC C� f ptga Fi __. ` _ 20 -SA I z,�a �a a LARGE BOULDER ii 4 , i1 n o ►a °'== / (REUSE EXISTING) �' R. f[ r-ca L' r� _../ 1 /a / .,44. if 31 p 4 / BARK 4► 1 ! MULCH 6 -VTS i i, 0 i 0 ;a / 22 -MC 7 -GTI0 CleanWater Services July 24, 2012 BILL LAMBERT VLMK CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3933 SW KELLY AV PORTLAND OR 97239 RE: Utility Construction (Light Post) CWS file 09-000047 (Tax map 2S101 BD Tax lot 00200) Clean Water Services has received your site plan for the construction of a 24- inch diameter light post at the subject tax lot. Per Section 3.05.5.c, placement of the light post within the Vegetated Corridor is allowed without replacement mitigation. Please attach this letter to the existing Service Provider Letter (CWS File No. 09-000047) to demonstrate compliance with Resolution and Order 07- 20. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect Sensitive Areas if they are subsequently identified on your site. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 681-3639. Sincerely, '_Laurie Harris Environmental Plan Review Attachment(1) 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax: (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org / i t___ Ili I I 51cAgP 4 t ;" 1 1 k,,.....i= , , F. _ 1 d) , : s IF4 I pp 14 I 1 I s --t 1'—''il Approved Clean Water eilpatt-kt,/ ,. ;YCrirH eDate z� iz < i By f� ,511,- A Ile i-ticeivt, v5 Pik At,. q-00e01l7 1 1 i ' '7;40. i 1 .-_—__----_ ; - 'k _.—__ ------ cr. E ; r-f-t- AW +2S'! i This light pole is F IJT I Existing---w in the "buffer" t € � wetland area that stops I at the edge of 1 ! I i :I�{t!,j • exist. development V 2 ti hw' G LiGtVVSC"(c/ € 1 ! •l A l -- -- i, 4, li5 lit s-E re v 04-'te,l 1 1 il i te.04.rvIt j, T 1. l'e �L to Ezr-&ai. Cc,-, ,tE0� i ti �-I-v�e- o C'uv , -h N\- r CONSULTING ' 503.222.4453 E N G I N E E R S 503.248.9263 vim k@vim k.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 www.vlmk.corn ��2ZV, 1 — pvvc�2- C TDC - Parking Final Intersection Sight Distance Certification Qc�� •a w�� December 18, 2012 >.. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON J1-',N 3 J13 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 718-2470 • FAX: (503) 969-4188 http://www.tigard-or.gov Attn: Mike White, Senior Engineering Technician RE: TDC - Parking – FINAL Sight Distance Certification SDR2011-00002 The shared access for this project is located on the site's west property line, onto SW Hunziker Road. The speed limit along SW Hunziker Road is 35 M.P.H., based upon the posted speed limit, requiring 350 feet of sight distance in both directions, in accord with Washington County Code Section 501- 8.5.F(4). As required by Washington County Code Sections 501-8.5-F(3)(a) AND 501-8.5 F(3)(b), sight distance from the access to SW Hunziker Road was measured to be 350+ feet to the west of the access in one direction and 350+ feet to the east of the access in the other direction. These Code Sections respectively require that measurements be based on an eye height of 3.5 feet and an object height of 4.25 feet above the road: and be assumed to be 10 feet from the near edge of pavement to the front of a stopped vehicle, (Actual measurement is taken 15 feet from pavement edge). In conclusion, I hereby certify that the intersection sight distance at the access for TDC– Parking conforms to the requirements for sight distance as set forth in the Washington County Community Development Code. PROFES 1 �;3 ‘-‘61G2177.49%-?". I t , • Robert J. Leger, P.E. OREGON VLMK Consulting Engineers 9 `Z 4h5,20 4)�9TJAMES\'� EXPIRES: 12/31/20 il- l Structural Engineering•Civil Engineering•Industrial Engineering•Planning•Studies/Evaluations•Entitlement File G.\Acad2010\2I0498\Permits\06 Seht Distance Certification\Final Set Distance Certihcatan.docx Page 1 Of 1 Printed: December 18,2012 b • VLMK C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S 3933 SW Kelly Avenue Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 503.222.4453 vlmk @vlmk.com 503.248.9263 www.vlmk.com 8 TDC- Parking 8001 -8005 SW Hunziker Road Tigard,OR ~ Drawn by: RJL Checked by: RJL FG = 150.7 il OBJ = 154.95 I l SHARE I1 1 % Nl■ ♦♦ ACCESS 1UI y' 8001 SW ♦ ♦■ 350' / / ( HUNZIKER ROAD f ■ r 1 1 Ii_Ana y ■ 1 -' , s "NEW PARKING AREA EDGE OF .„ --` TRAVELED WAY \ \ °� �Jrr� FG = 150.7 °4Zi. '` f■ EYE = 154.2 r %` 350 4�t7 .i r ir FG = 153.8 .,,t OBJ = 158.05 ,W E INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE EXHIBIT 1” = 100'u7.7...i--1.- 111 11 r S 100 0 100 200 300 210498 Sight Distance Exhibit.dwg 41-1,1w Tree Preservation, Inc. 4018 N.Colonial Ave.I Portland,OR 97227 503.704 80241 www.overlooktree.com LICENSED,BONDED&INSURED CCB#176365 CERTIFIED ARBORIST PN-0742AT January 28, 2013 REC VED Reference. Tree Mitigation Plan for Tigard Distribution Center JAN Location: 8001 SW Hunziker Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 29 2013 Contact: Mr. Bill LambertNLMK Consulting Engineers CITY Phone: 503-222-4453 P"NNING ENG N ED Owner: Karl Klokke (Walt River, Deering Management) RING ATTN: Ms. Cheryl Caines/City of Tigard The purpose of this report is to determine whether or not the aforementioned trees that were planted at the above address were done so correctly, and follow The City of Tigard approved Tree Mitigation Plan. This report was accompanied by a site plan provided by Otten Landscape Architects and was dated 8-30-12. Any legal description provided to the consultant is assumed to be correct. Titles and ownership to the property are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for legal matters. The consultant can neither guarantee nor be held responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. Unless expressed otherwise, information in this report covers only items that were examined and were based on a visual inspection only. No diagnostic tools were used during the visit. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the trees or property in question may not arise in the future. It is the clients responsibility to implement and oversee that the mitigation plan was done to meet the City codes and regulations. I recently visited the site at 8001 SW Hunziker Rd. in Tigard, Oregon on 1-16-13. After my visual inspection I did contact VLMK Consulting Engineers and reported that the trees that were recently planted were not staked? Bill Lambert, of VLMK has informed me that they now have been staked by the company employed to plant the aforementioned trees. These stakes should be inspected and most likely removed after one year. Leaving the stakes on any longer can lead to poor lateral root growth and could result in the uprooting of these trees caused by excessive moisture or wind throw. oQe L Tree Preservation, Inc. 4018 N.Colonial AVe I Portland,OR 97227 503 704 8024 I www.overlooktree,com LICENSED,BONDED&INSURED CCB#176366 CERTIFIED ARBORIST PN-0742AT January 28, 2013 Page 2. Reference: Tree Mitigation Plan for Tigard Distribution Center Location: 8001 SW Hunziker Rd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 No soil health was evaluated nor do I know what amendments were added to the planted trees. If there is not adequate rainfall (unlikely during the months of November through June), apply at least (1) inch of water per week by using deep soaking methods. Fertilization with macro- and micro-nutrients can aid and `put back' into the soil what may be missing. This can only be determined by doing a soil test. Bark mulch was installed at approximately 1.5" to 2.0" based on my visual inspection. In some cases I did find that the mulch was covering the DGL (diameter at ground level). Care and inspection in the future, and keeping the mulch away from the trunks can help long term survivability and the unnecessary removal and replacement of the trees. The trees at this time appear to be acclimating and should be inspected and cared for if necessary in the spring after bud break. Consulting with the project Arborist in the future can help reduce the likelihood of tree failure. Protection and maintenance of the trees will greatly reduce the number and frequency of having to remove the mitigated trees. In conclusion, I feel that the trees planted at the site should fulfill The City of Tigard's approved Tree Mitigation Plan. With proper care and preservation of these trees, I believe that the impact, in the long term, will benefit the community forest and maintain a healthy canopy cover in the area. If you require any further technical information please feel free to contact me at 503-704-8024. Sincerely, Kevin MacKenzie Certified Arborist # PN-0742AT CCB# 176365 CITY OF TIGARD 1/29/2013 11111 I 7:52:20AM • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. TIGARD Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 Conditions Associated With Case #: SDR2011-00002 Project Name: Tigard Distribution Center # DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS DATE SEVERITY APPLIED BY ACTION BY SERVICE PROVIDER LTR Met 8/17/11 Cheryl Caines Cheryl Caines 01. If discussions with the neighboring property owner include plan revisions, then the applicant shall submit the revised site plan for review and approval prior to issuance of site/building permits to ensure Tigard Community Development Code(TDC)standards are still satisfied. In addition, if the Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter is amended as part of these discussions,then a copy of the amended letter must also be submitted. REV SITE PLAN/WALKWAY CROSSING Met 8/17/11 Cheryl Caines Cheryl Caines 02. Prior to issuance of site/building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval that shows a walkway crossing a vehicular way that is a minimum of 4 feet wide and no longer than 36 feet. STREET TREES Met 8/19/11 Cheryl Caines Todd Prager 03. The applicant shall provide additional street trees along the eastern and western portion of the street frontage to meet the spacing requirements in section 18.745.040.C. PARKING LOT TREES Met 9/19/11 Cheryl Caines Todd Prager 04. The applicant shall provide additional parking lot trees within the front, middle, and back parking lots to meet the ,one tree for every seven parking spaces6 standard in section 18.745.050.E. TREE MITIGATION Met 8/19/11 Cheryl Caines Todd Prager 05. Prior to issuance of the building permit,the applicant shall submit a mitigation plan to the City Arborist for review and approval. The plan must have a signature of approval from the project arborist certifying that it meets the requirements of 18.790.060(D)and that the species and placement of mitigation trees has been reasonably calculated to provide for their growth to maturity. The mitigation proposal shall show the species, location, and spacing of mitigation trees in relation to buildings, infrastructure, existing trees on adjacent sites, street trees, and each other. CASH ASSURANCE/TREE MITIGATION Met 8/6/11 Cheryl Caines Cheryl Caines 06. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a cash assurance(letter of credit or cash deposit)for the equivalent value of mitigation required (e.g. 136 caliper inches of proposed mitigation tree planting x$125/caliper inch). Any trees successfully planted on or off-site, in accordance with an approved Tree Mitigation Plan and TDC 18.790.060.D, will be credited against the assurance two years after all of the trees are planted. After the plan is approved and the trees are planted, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the City Arborist to certify that all of the mitigation trees were properly planted per the approved Tree Mitigation Plan in order to set the starting point of the two year tree establishment period. After the two year establishment period, the applicant shall provide a re-inventory of the mitigation trees conducted by a certified arborist in order to document mitigation tree survival, and compliance with the approved Tree Mitigation Plan. The remaining value of caliper inches not successfully mitigated shall be paid as a fee in-lieu of planting. Failure to plant and provide documentation of mitigation tree planting by the project arborist within 6 months of certificate of occupancy issuance shall result in the forfeiture of the cash assurance to the City6s tree fund. PUBLIC FACILITY IMPROVEMENT Met 12/17/12 Mike White Albert Shields Page 1 of 3