HomeMy WebLinkAboutMLP2008-00005 �
_F. :
�:
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION 4 ;: ;
aTA
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2008-00005 �� � s
�
REPTA PARTITION
(Indudes a 30 day�estension) 120 DAYS = 11/10/2008
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: REPTA PARTITION
CASE NOS.: Minor Land Partition(MLP) MLP2008-00005
Adjustment (VAR) VAR2008-00022
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to partition one (1) existing .62 acre site into
two (Z) parcels. The ex�stuig residence on Parcel 1 wi11 rernaui and is used for senior care with
five (5) residents, which is a pernutted use within the zone. Parcel 2 will be used for a new
single-family residence. Parcel 1 will be 15,477 square feet and Parcel 2 will be 10,448 squ��are
feet. An Ad�ustment has also been requested to the Street Im� provement Standards to a�.low
access from Parcel 2 onto the Lomita Avenue cul-de-sac. The n�imum alloaed units is
twenty(20� onto cul-de-sacs. This max.i.mum is cw7-ently exceeded because there are eight (8)
single-farrulyuruts,ten (10) duplexes, and appro�matelyeighry eight (88) multi-familyuruts that
have access onto SW Lorruta Avenue. The adjustment will allow the applicant to ulcrease that
number by one additional unit.
APPLICANT & Vasile Rcpta APPLICANT'S Campbell Planning &Development,Inc.
OWNER 11400 SW 90`�Avenue REP.: Attn:Doug Camphell
Tigard,OR 97223 3851 SW 50�'Avenue
Portland,OR 97221
COMPRE HE NSIVE
PLAN
DESIGNATION: R-4.5;Low DensityResidential.
ZONE: R 4.5 Low Densit Residential. The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate
detache sing e- amily omes a�ith or without accessory residential uruts at a nununum lot size
of 7,500 square feet. Dup lexes and attached single-fa�ruly units are permitted conditionally.
Some crvic and u�sututional uses are also pernutted conditionally.
LOC',ATION: 11400 SW 90`}'Avenue;WCIM 1S 135DA,Tax Lot 2900.
PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 15,447 Square Feet.
PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 10,448 Square Feet.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: Communiry Development Code Chapters 18.370 (Variances and Ad1�ustments ; 18.390
(Decision-IVlakin Procedures�; 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning�istricts);
18J05 (Access �gress and Grculation); 18J15 (Density Computations); 18J45 (Landscap ing
and Screenin�); 18J65 (Off-Street parking and Loaduig Requirements); 18J90 (�I'ree
Removal)• 18795 (Visual Clearance Areas); and 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement
Standards�.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby�iven that the City of Ti�ard Community Development Director's desi�nee has APPROVED the
above request sub�ect to certain conditions. The findin�s and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in
Section V.
NOTTC� OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTION PAGE 1 OF 20
.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO SITE WORK:
e app icant s a �prepare a cover etter an su mit it, a ong wi any suppo�rt�ng ocuments an orp ans
that address the folTowing requirements to the PLANNING DIVISION, A�I'TN: CHERYL CAINES 503-
639-4171. The cover letter shaIl cleady identify where in the submittal the required information is found:
1. Prior to site worl� the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval showing protection
specifications for the ex�stuzg hedge on the north side of the proposed access drive to Parcel2.
?. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit a revised site plan to the City Arborist for review and approval
showing the location of the required tree protecuon fencing (6-foot metal), tree protecuon s�pe�cifications, and
tree protection zone dimensions to scale in accordance with the Project Arborist's report. The plan shall be
signed by the Project Arborist.
3. Prior to site work,the applicant shall position fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to
be retained. The applicant shall position fencmg as directed by the project arborist in h.is report dated May 5,
2008 to protect the trees to be retained. Fencuig shall be 6-foot metal. The applicant shall allow access by the
City Arborist for the purpose of morutorin and u�spection of the tree protection to verify that the tree
protection measures are perfomiing adequate�y Failure to follow the plan or n�v.ntaui tree protecuon fencing
ui the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate suspension o� work on the site until remediation
measures and/or crvil citations can be processed.
4. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall prepare a proposal
detailing the construcuon techniques to be empIoy�d and the likely impacts to the trees. The proposaI shall be
reviewed and approved by the Csty Arborist before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone.
The Cary Arbonst may requu-e changes prior to approval. The project arbonst shall be on site while work is
occun-uig withul the tree protection zone and submit a swrunary report cert�fying that the work occurred per
the prop�osal and will not significantly unpact the health andlor stabihty of the trees. Th�s note shall be included
on the Tree Protection Plan.
S. The applicant shall have an on-�oing responsibiliry to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written
reports to the Ciry Arborist, at least once every two weeks, as the Project Arborist monitors the construction
activities from uutial tree protection zone ('1�'Z) fencing installation through the building construction phases.
The reports shall evaluate the condition and location of the tree protecuon fenculg, detemiine �f any changes
occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree Protecuon Plan has been violated. If the amount of TPZ was
reduced then the Project Arbonst shall certify that the construction activities did not adversely impact the
overall, �ong-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted to the City Arbonst at the
scheduled u�tervals, and if it appears the TT'Z's or the Tree Protection Plan are not beu-ig followed by the
contractor or a sub-contractor, the Caty can stop work on the pro�ect until an u�spection can be done by the
Ciry Arborist and the Project Arbonst.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHAI_L BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
e app icant s a prepare a cover etter an su rrut it, a on wi any supportin ocuments an orp ans
that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERI�G DIVISION, AT�: HIM MCMILLAN 503-
639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is
found:
6. Prior to commencin�g onsite imp rovements, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) ernut is required for this
project to cover half-street and any other work in the public nght-of-way. Six �6) sets of detailed public
unprovement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineeruig Department. NOTE: these plans are
in addition to any drawuigs required by the Building Div�sion and should only include sheets reIevant to
pub 'i�c unprovements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI� perniit plans shall conform to City of Tigard
Public Improvement Design Standards, which are ava�lable at City Hall and the Cit}�s web page
(www.tigard-or.gov).
NOTIC� OF DEQSION MLP2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTTON PAGE 2 OF 20
7. The PFI pernut plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and tele�phone number of the
individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Pernzittee", and who wiIl provide the financial
assurance for the public unprovements. For examp�le, sp ecify if the entiry is a corporation, limited
parcnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity�s incorporated and provide the name
of the corporate contact person. Fa�lure t� provide accurate inlomiatioii to the Enguieer�ng Department
will delay processuzg of pro�ect documents.
8. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the Ciry
Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic controI during the public unprovement
construction phase.
9. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF GONTACT: Bethany Stewart,
Engineerin�.
10. Prior to final plat aP roval, the applicant shall plant street trees alon the fronta e of SW 90th Avenue and
along the frontage o}�W Lomita Avenue (if there�s space along the c�de-sac bulb�.
11. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future
improvements of SW 90th and SW Lomita Avenues adjacent to the subject property,when anyof the following
events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the forn�ation of a
Local Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part bythe
Ciry or other public agency,
G when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third pany and involves the
sharin of design and/or construction e�enses by the third pany owner(s) of property in addition to
the su�ject property,or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the Ciry Engineer in
conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site.
12. The applicant shall obtain a proval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection
prior to �ssuance of the City�s Public Facility Improvement pernut.
13. An erosion control plan shall be �rovided as part of the Public Faciliry Improvement (PFI)�perniit drawings.
The plan shall conform to the Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Plannuig Manual,
Febniary 2003 edition."
14. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the Cit}�s global
positionulg system (GPS�geodetic control network(GC 22) as recorded in Washington County survey records.
These monuments shall e on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdrv�sion
plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contaui the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to gnd measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be
established by.
. GPS tie networked to the Cat�s GPS surve}�
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
15. Final Plat Application Subnvssion Requireinents:
A. Submit for City review four (4) pa��er copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to
practice in Oregon and necessary data or narrative. . . .
B. Attach a check ui t�e amount of the curY-ent final plat review fee (Contact Plannuig/Engineenng Pernut
Technicians, at (503) 639-4171,ext.2421).
G The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the muuinum standards set forth by the Oregon
Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05) Washin on County, and bythe Cityof Tigard.
D. The right-of-way dedication for SW 9�Avenue,providing 27 feet from centerline, and for SW Lomita
Avenue,providuzg a 51-foot radius,shall be made on the fu7al plat.
E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive notice from
the Engineering Department indicating that the Ciry has reviewed the final plat and submitted
comments to the app hcant's surveyor.
F. After the City and Z:ounty have reviewed the final plat, submit one pap er copy of the final plat for City
Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community I�evelopment Director signatures
(for subdiv�sions).
NOTICE OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PART'ITION PAGE 3 OF 20
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BLTILDING PERMITS:
e app icant s a prepare a cover etter an su mrt it, a on wi any supporting ocuments an or ans
that address the folIowing requirements to the PLANNIN�DIVISION, ATTN CHERYL CAINE�503-
639-4171, EXT 2437. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is
found:
16. Prior to issuance of a buildin�pernut for Parcel2,the applicant shall supply building elevations, site plans and
a narrative showing how t e flag lot he�igh� t standards are met. Tfvs uicludes a 20-foot garage setback
Requirements for flag lots are outlined in TL�C 18.730.020.C. Side yard setbacks for flag lots are typically 10
feet.
17. Prior to building pernut issuance, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval that
indicates the size, species, and location of street trees along 90`'' Avenue and Lomita Avenue }or the City
Arborist's review and approval. Spacing of such trees shall be in accordance with Section 18J45.040.G2.0 of
the Tigard Development Code. A note may be placed on the plan that states "slight variations in placement
may be required, but every effort will be made to keep the same net number of street trees that are shown
on the plan."
18. At the time of submittal for a building pern�it for the home on Parcel 2, the applicant shall submit materiaLs
demonstrating that one (1) off-street parkuig space, which meets mmim� dunensional requirements and
setback requu-ements as spec�fied in Title 18,will be provided on-site for the new home.
19. Prior to i�suance of building pemuts, the applicant shall submit a building site plan to the building division
indicatin the locations of trees that were preserved on the lot during site development. In addition, the plans
shall inc�ude accurate locations of tree canopy driplines and protection fencing, and a signature of approval
from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the
structures. All proposed protection fencuzg shall be installed and insp ected prior to commencing construction.
The fencing shall reir�aui in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases, until the
Certificate of Occupancyhas been approved.
The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporti�ng documents and/o�r plans
that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DIVISION,ATTN: KIM MCMILLAN 503-
639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is
found:
20. Prior to issuance of building pernuts,the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a paper copy
of the recorded final plat.
21. The Ciry Engineer may detemzine the necessity for,and re uire submittal and approval of,a construction access
and parkuig plan for the home bwlding phase. If the C.�ty�ngineer deems such a plan necessary, the applicant
shall provide the plan pnor to�ssuance o} builduig pernuts.
22. Prior to issuance of buildin ermits within the subdivision the City En ineer shall deem the ublic
improvements substantially compplete. Substantial com letion s�iall be when: �) all utilities are installed and
u�spected for compliance, ulcludulg franchise utiliues, �) all local residential streets have at least one lift of
asphalt, 3) any off-site street and/or utiliry improvements are substantially completed, and 4) all street lights are
installed and ready to be energized.
23. The applicant shall either place the e�stin orerhead utilityr lines along SW 90th Avenue underground as a part
of this project,or they shall pay the fee in-�eu of undergrounduig. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of
the site that �s parallel to the utility lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option �s chosen, the
amount will be $4,525.50 and it shall be paid prior to issuance of builduig pern�uts.
24. Durin�issuance of the building pernut for Parcel 2,the applicant shall pay the standard water qualiry and water
quanuty fees per lot (fee amounts will be the latest approved by CV�).
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTTON PAGE 4 OF 20
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
e app icant s a prepare a cover etter an su m�t �t, a ong wi any supporting ocuments an or�p ans
that address the following requirements to the PLANNING DIVISI(�N, ATTN: CHER1'L CAINES 503-
639-4171, EXT 2437. The cover letter shall cleady identify where in the submittal the required information is
found:
25. Prior to final inspection for each lot, the applicant shall submit a final report bythe Project Arborist certifying
the health of protected trees and that the street trees were properly planted per the approved street tree plan.
Tree protection measures may be removed and f inal inspection authorized upon review and approval by the
Caty Arborist.
26. Prior to issuance final building inspection, the applicant/owner shall record deed restrictions to the effect that
any existing tree greater than 6" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a
cert�fied arbonst. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved ui
accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree.
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION
OF THIS DECISION.
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site and Vicini Information
e .62 acre site is ocate on the east side of SW 90`�' Avenue, between SW Greenburg Road and SW North Dakota
Street. A small fla from the lot fronu onto SW Lomita Avenue, located to the east. The site �s zoned R 4.5 (Low
Density Residentia�, as are all surrounding properties. An existing residence sits near the 90`}' Avenue frontage, and it
will remain on proposed Parcel 1. The ex�sting residence is currently used as a senior care facility with five residents.
Homes in the area are single-familyand duplexes of varying ages. Some commercial and multi-familydevelopments are
found to the west along Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard.
Pro e Histo .
A searc o City records shows only land use cases related to the minor land partition, no other approvals were found
affecting this parcel.
Pro osal Descri tion
e owner is proposin a two lot artition. An existing home will remain on Parcel 1. A new sin le-family residence
will be constructed on�arcel2. �e net square footage of the two parcel� will be: Parcel 1 - 15,�47 s qu�are feet and
Parcel 2 - 10 448. The home on parcel 1 will n�untaui the e�c�stuzg driveway to 90`�' Avenue. Parcel 2 v�n11 be accessed
by a 15-foot�lag to Lomita Avenue.
SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
The Tigard CommunityDevelopment Code re uires that propertyowners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified
of the proposal, and be given an opportunity�or wntten comments and/or oral testimonypnor to a dec�sion being
made. In addition,staff has posted a notice on the site,visible from the street. Notice of appLcation was sent on July 3,
2008. A revised notice was sent on August 12, 2008 to include a required adjustment to the street improvement
standards to allow more than 20 uruts to access onto Lomita Avenue suice it ternunates with a cul-de-sac. No
comments were received during the original comment period, but one letter was received during the second comment
period.
Ron Heitz stated that the site's existing residence appears to be utilized as an elderlycare faciliry and not a single-family
residence. There are caretakers corrurig and gomg all the tune and Tri-Met buses stop to pick up elderly ui front of the
home.
NOTIC� OF DEQSION ML.I'2008-00005/REPTA PART'ITTON PAGE 5 OF 20
Staff Response: After receiving the above comments, staff contacted the applicant's representative, Doug
Campbell, regarding the use of the e�sting home and the proposed use for Parcel 2. Mr.
Campbell was unaware of a senior care faciliry,, but spoke with the apphcant, Vasile Repta,
about the uses. Mr. Repta verified that the exisung home on Parcel 1 �s used as a senior care
facility with five residents. Staff confirmed that the facility is licensed by the Washin�ton
County Department of Disability, ing and Veteran Services for five residents. Group hvuig
with five or fewer residents is perm tt d outright within the R 4.5 zone; group living with s�c or
more residents is pemzitted as a conditional use. Because the existing use has five residents,no
additional pernuttulg or review is required.
SE CI'ION V. APPLICABLE RE VIE W CRITE RIA AND FINDINGS
Variances and Adjustments (18.370�
Adjustments for street im rovement requirements (Chapter 18.810). By means of a Type II procedure, as
governed by Section 18.39�040, the Director shall app rove, approve with conditions, or deny a rec�uest for an
ad�ustment to the street improvement requirements,based on�indings that the following criterion is satisfied:
Stnct application of the standarris will result in an unacceptably adverse impact on exist�n� development, on
the proposed development, or on natural features such as wedands, bodies of water, signiticant habitat areas
steep slopes or e�st�ng inature trees. In approving an adjustment to the standards, the Director shal�
detemune that the potent�al adverse impacts exceed the public benefits of strict application of the standards.
The ap licant is requesting an adjustment to the street improvement rec�uirements. Code section 18.810.030.L states
that c�de-sacs shaIl not provide access to more than 20 dwelling uruts. Czurently there are more than 20 units. There
are 8 single-fanuly uruts and approxi.mately 10 duplexes that access SW Lomita Avenue (cul-de-sac). The Park Place
aparments a�th 88 units also have access onto Lomrta. The applicant notes that the apartment com�plex has two access
�ou-its and Lomita appears to be a secondary access. The apartment office is oriented to and deGveries are received
rom SW 88�' Avenue. The code does not account for pnmary versus secondary accesses; therefore there are
approximately 116 units which have access onto Lomita Avenue.
The site being partitioned has frontage on SW 90`'' Avenue and a 15-foot flag that fronts on SW Lomita Avenue. The
site's frontage on Lomita pre-exists the Lomita Terrace subdivision approved in 1962 as can be seen on the plat. The
only alternauve access pouit to proposed Parcel 2 is from SW 90`� Avenue along the north side of the existing home.
The existing home is too close to the southern property line to provide access along that boundary. Locatin$the access
drive along the norhtern boundary would imp act numerous trees on-site and on the adjacent property. �everal trees
within the northern side yard of Parcel 1 wouId need to be removed and roots of trees on the ad�acent property would
also be affected. An e.�stuig shed on Parcel l would need to be moved and the amount of usable yard area on the site
would be significantlydecreased.
Allowing the new residence access onto Lomita Avenue would have no adverse impacts on the public. Lomita is a local
street with a 50 foot ftOW. This local street section is approved for less than 500 vpd. However, the a plicant and
future develo pers are re quired to dedicate R�W to the 54 foot sections which is a p proved for less than 1,�D0 v pd. In
this case the adverse impact to the trees outweighs anybenefit to the public in reqwrYng access to be from 90�'Avenue.
Land Partitions �18.420�
The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations;
The proposed partition complies or can be made to comp�ly with all statutory and ordinance requirements and
regulauons as demonstrated by the analysis contained within this admuvstrative dec�sion and through the imposition of
conditions of development approval. All necessary conditions must be satisfied as part of the development and
building process. Therefore,tFiis cntenon is met.
There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement
Standards). Based on the analysis provided herein, Staff finds that adequate pubhc facilities are available to serve the
proposal. Therefore,this cntenon�s met.
NOTTC� OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTT7TON PAGE 6 OF 20
All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards;and
The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this deci�ion under Chapter
18.8I0 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards). Improvements will be reviewed as pan of the pernut process and
during COI1StTL1Ct10I1� at wlucli tune tlie appropnate review authority will ensure that City and applicable agency
standards are met. Based on the analy�sis u1 this dec�sion,Staff finds that this critenon�s met.
All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning
district
The average m;n�r„um lot width required for the R 4.5 zoning district is 50 feet. Parcel # 1 is 129 feet wide as it fronts
SW 90`'' Avenue. The other lot is considered a flag lot, and front yards can be deterTruried by the applicant. As
proposed the southern side will be the frontyard. The narrowest measurement of Parcel n�nn,ng east to west is
approxunately 61 f eet. Theref ore,this standard has been met.
The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district In the case of a flag lot,the accessway may
not be included in the lot area.
The muumum lot area requirement in the R 4.5 zoning district is 7,500 square feet for detached
single-fam�ily�units. The proposed partition creates two (?) lots. Parcell �s 15,447 square feet. A flag provides access to
Parcel 2. Z'lvs access flag is not included in the site area for lot 2. The net areas of the three proposed parcel is 10,448
square feet. This critenon has been met.
Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a
legally recorded minimum 15-toot wide access easement
Parcel 1 has 129 feet of fronta e along SW 90`t'Avenue. The access flag for Parcel2 will have 19.84 feet of frontage on
SW Lomita Avenue after the�edication of nght-of-way. T�vs cnterion�s met.
Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district
Setbacks for the R 4.5 zoning district are as follows: front, 20 feet; side, 5 feet; street side, 15 feet; and rear 15 feet.
Because Parcel2 is considered a flag lot, the side�ya rd setbacks are increased to 10 feet. The setbacks for t�ie future
home on lot 2 will be reviewed at the time of building pernut submittal. Setbacks for the e�sting home on Parcel 1
meet the re uirements• setbacks are discussed further under the Residential Zoning Districts section of this decision. A
condition o� approva� under the Residentia] Zoning Districts section will ensure the applicant shows the correct
setbacks on the building site pla.ns. This cnterion can be met conditionally.
When the partitioned lot is a flag lot,the developer may detemiine the location of the front yard, provided that
no side yarcl is less than 10 fee� Structures shall generally be located so as to maaurnize separation from
existing structures.
Parcel2 will be a flag lot, and any proposed structure must meet the 10-foot side yard setback standard. The ap licant
has noted that the south side will be the front yard on Parcel 2. Flag lot requirements are d�scussed in more det�under
the Exceptions to Development Standards section of th�s report.
A screen shall be provided alon the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is
located within ten feet of an a�utting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be
required to maintain privacy for abumng lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed
development
An existing arborvitae hedge will be rr�aintained on the north side of the access drive to Parcel 2. A new hedge is
proposed along the southern property line.
The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a
detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLP2008-00005/REPTA PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 20
T1ie applicant states that a fire hydrant is located along SW 90�'Avenue. A fire flow test was done and is included with
the application. 7�e hytirant provides ade uate flow as stated under the Additional Agency Concerns section of this
dec�sion. Tualatul Valley Fire and Rescue (�'VF&R) sent no comments or conditions regarding access or water supplies
for this project.
Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure
access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved paitition map.
No common driveway�s are proposed.
Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705,Access,Egress and Circulation.
T�vs standard is addressed under Chapter 18.705 (Access,Egress and Cu-culation) later in this decision.
Where landfill and/or develo ment is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred year floodplain, the city
shall require consideration o�the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within
the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a
pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodpla�n m accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway
plan.
The partitioned lots are�approximately 1,015 feet to the south of the nearest 100-year floodpla.in. The elevation of the
floodplain is 163 feet,wtule the site�s at 230 feet. Therefore,this standard does not apply.
An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with
Chapter 18.370,Variances and Adjustrnents. The applications forthe partition and variance(s)/adjustrnent(s)
will be processed concurrendy.
An ad'ustment to the street improvement standards is required because there are more than 20 units that have access
onto t�e existing cul-de-sac. Tlvs adjustment is discussed ul further detail under the Variances and Adjustments section
of this decision.
FINDING: The Land Partition standards are met.
Residential Zonin Districts (18.510�:
Development stan�ards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below:
TABLE 18.510.2: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
STANDARD R-4.5 Parcell Parcel2
Minimum Lot Size
-Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft, 15,447 sq.ft. 10,448 sq.ft.[1]
-Duplexes
-Attached unit
Average Minimum Lot Width
-Detached unit lots 5C ft 129 ft. 61 ft.
-Duplex lots 90 ft
-Attached unit lots
Maximum Lot Covera e - N/A N/A
Minimum Setbacks Can be met[2]
-Front yan� 20 ft. 24 ft.
-Side facing street on comer&through lots 15 ft N/A
-Side ya�d 5 ft. 3S ft./9.5 ft.
-Rear yard 15 ft 9 ft.[4]
-Side or rearyard abutling mom iestrictive zoning dishict -- N/A
-Distance between ro Gne and front of ara e 20 ft. 66 ft.
Maximum Hei ht 30 ft. 21 ft.[3] Can be met
Minitnum Landsca e Re uiiement - N/A N/A
[1]Net lot area that excludes access easemenu.
[2]Parce12 is a flag lot;therefom 10 foot side yard setbacks are required.
[3]Based on building permit(MST2003-00257).
[4]The existing deck on Parcel 1 projects into the rear yard setback. Because the deck is 24 inches in height it is allowed within the setback by 18.730.OSD.D.
The main structure meeu the standard with a 16.5-foot setback.
NOTTC� OF DEQSION MLP2008-00005/REPTA PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 20
A m;n;mum lot size of 7,500 square feet is reguired for each lot. The proposed lot sizes meet this standard.
Setbacks of the existing home are met for Parcel 1 as outlined above. The home �s currently used for senior care
with five (5) residents. No special setbacks apply for this use, so the detached urut reqwrements apply. The
applicant states that the standards will be met on I'arcel 2. Site and building plans for Parcel 2 will be reviewed
through the building pernzit process to ensure compliance with the R-4.5 zone and flag lot development standards,
includuig setbacks and height restrictions.
FINDING: Based on the analys is above, the Residenual Zoning District Standards will be met pursuant to
the following conditions:
GONDITION: Prior to issuance of a building pernut for Parcel 2, the applicant shall submit building
elevations, site plans and a narrative to the Planning Division showulg how the flag lot
height standards are met. T�us includes a 20-foot garage setback. Requu-ements for flag lots
are outlined in TDC 18.730.020.C. Side yard setbacks for flag lots are typically 10 feet.
Access,Egress and Ci�ulation(18.705):
Continuing obligation of p%perty owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in
this tide are cont�nuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the Gty.
Joint Access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parrels of land may agree to utilize joindy the same
access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, orp amels of land satisfies
the combined requirements as designated in this tide, provided:Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented
in the fornl of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the �oint use; and copies of the deeds,
easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City.
Joint access is not proposed with this development. Parcel 1 w�ll continue to utilize the e�sting drive to 90�' Avenue
and Parcel 2 will access onto Lomita Avenue.
Cutfi cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N
Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall
connect direcdy with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at
the required standards on a cont�nuous basis.
All proposed parcels will have access to a public street. Parcel 1 has access onto 90`'' Avenue. An access drive to
Lorruta�s proposed for Parcel2. This standard is met.
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals
which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stackin�g needs, sight distance
and deceleration standancls as set by ODOT, Washington County,the City and AASHTO.
The applicant's engineer has indicated on the plans that the si ht distance from the existing driveway on SW 90th
Avenue �s 283 feet to the nonh and 500 feet to the south. � 90th Avenue is classified as a local street with a
maximum speed of 25 mph,which requires a rnuuinum sight distance of 250 feet. This criterion is met. The proposed
driveway for the new lot will enter the cul-de-sac bulb o} SW Lomita Avenue. At the entry into the cul-de-sac, the
vehicle will not have on-corrung traffic at significant speed with which to contend. Any traffic will be from other
driveways or velucles tLU-ning around and the travel speed will be minin�l, therefore vehicles exiting the subject
propertywill have adequate sight d�stance and response tune to enter the cul-de-sac safely.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of
collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is tFiat area where gueues of traffic
commonly form on ap�proach to an inteisection. The minimum driveway setback from a coIIector or arterial
street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat
of the �proposed driveway. The setback may be greater dependin upon the influence area, as determined
from C�ity Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by�e applicant's traffic engineer. In a case
where a pro�ect has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any op tion for shared
access with the adjacent pamel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway sFiall be placed as
far from the intersect�on as possible.
This property is not located on a collector or arterial street;therefore the standard dces not apply.
NOTTC� OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 20
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacin of driveways and streets along a collector shall
be 200 fee� The minimum s acin��of drivewa�ys and streets a�on an a�tenal shall be 600 feet The minimum
spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet g
The property is not located on a collector or anerial and is not constructing a local street; therefore this standard does
not apply.
Minimum access require�nents for residential use. Table 18.705.1 states that the minimum vehicular access
and egress for single-family dwelling units on individual lots shall be one, 10-foot paved driveway within a 15-
foot-wide accessway. The minimum access width for 3-6 dwelling units is 20 feet with 20 feet of pavemen�
The e�cisting drive for Parcel 1 is 15 feet wide. A 15-foot access with 10-foot paved drive is proposed for Parcel2. This
standard is met.
Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the
Uniform Fire Code.
Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with app roved provisions for the turning amund
of fire apparatus by one of the followin :a) A ci�ular,paved surface having a minimum tum radius measured
from center point to outside edge of 3�feet; b) A hammerhead-configured, paved surface with each leg of the
hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet; c) The maximum cross
slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
Only a private driveway onto SW Lomita Avenue is proposed to access Parcel2. The home on Parcel 1 will continue
to use the e�sung dnveway to SW 90�' Avenue. Pnvate access drives are not proposed for this partition. No
comments were received from Tualatin ValleyFire and Rescue.
FINDING: The standards for Access,Egress,and Crrculation are met.
Density Comvutations and Limitations (18.715�:
Chapter 18.7 implements the Compre ensive Plan by establishin� the criteria for determining the number
of dwellin units permitted. The number of allowable dwellin units is based on the net development area.
The net area is tfie remaining par�el area after exclusion of e nsitive lands and land dedicated for public
roads or parks. The net area is then divided by the minimum lot size permitted by the zoning distnct to
determine the number of dwelling units that may be developed on a site.
Based on the formulas in Chapter 18.715 of the Ciry of Tigard Community Development Code, the ir��xunum and
rninuntun number of units per�utted on the site �s based on the net develoPable area, subtracting sensitive land areas,
land dedicated to public parks, land dedicated for pu_blic rig,ht-of-way land }or private streets or access dnves, and lot
area for the e�sting home from the total site area. The density is calcuiated as foIlows:
ross �te Area 6 786 s . t.
Ri t-o -Wa e icanon on W 90 Avenue - 259 s . t.
Accesswa an - 888 s . t.
L,ot or E�cistui Home - 15 193s . t.
Net ite Area 10 446 s . t.
The resulting net area is 10,446 square feet. If this area is divided bythe nununum lot size for the zone �7,500),then the
maximum number of additional lots pernutted on this site is 1 and the muiunum number is 1. The app cant's proposal
to create 1 additional lot for a detached urut meets the i7�axunum and nununum density reqwrements of the R 4.5 zone.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the Density Standards have been satisfied.
Exce�tions to Develo�ment Standards (18.730):
The maximum eight �or an attac e or detached single-family, duplex, or multiple-family residential
structure on a flag lot or a lot having sole access from an accessway private drive or easement is 1-1/2
stories or 25 feet, whichever is less, except that the maximum heig�it may be 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet,
whichever is less, provided:
a. The prop osed dwelling otherwise complies with the applicable dimensional requirements of the
zoning district;
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PAR7T7TON PAGE 10 OF 20
b. A 10 feet side yard will be preserved;
c. A residential structure on any abutting lot either is located 50 feet or more from the nearest point of
the subject dwelling, or the residential structure exceeds 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet in height on any
abutting lot; and
d. Windows 15 feet or more above grade shall not face dwelling unit windows or patios on any
abutting lot unless the proposal includes an agreement to plant trees capable of mitigating direct
views, or that such trees exist and will be preserved.
The applicant shows 10-foot side yard setback on Parcel 2, but no specific building design is pmposed. The
applicant states that residences to the east, west and south are within 50 feet of the proposed structure. Homes to
the east and south are 1-story. The home to the west is 2-story. Additional buffenng and screerung will be planted
as necessary with the future structure. The applicant re quests that compliance with these requirements be reviewed
at the time of buildu-ig permit. A condiuon of approval under the Residenual Zoning Distnct secuon will ensure
these standards are met.
FINDING: Based on the infornlation provided, staff cannot deterniine if the Exceptions criteria are met,
but can be met as conditioned previously with submittal of acceptable btuldulg and site
plans.
Landscaping and Screening(18.745�
Section 18.745.030.0 states that the installation of all landscaping shall be as follows:
1. All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures.
The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These �.u'delines follow
those set forth by the International Society of Arbonculture (ISA) tree plantin guidelines as well as the standards set
forth in the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standar�, lOth edition. In the Architectural
Grap hic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and plantin� trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity.
Additionally;there are directions for so�l amendments and modificauons.
2. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and gradin� standards of the
Amencan Standards forNurberg Stock(ANSI Z-60, 1-1986,and any other future revrsions); and
3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this tide.
Certificate of Occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements
have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a
bond.
E�cisting vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1) The developer shall provide methods
for the protection of e�cistin� vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2) the plants to be
saved sball be noted on the randsca e lans (e. .,areas not to be distu�fied can be fenced, as in snow fencing
I
which can be placed around the in �vi ual trees .
Tree protection is addressed under the Tree Removal section of this decision.
Street trees: Section 18.745.040
Section 18.745.040.A.: All development projects frontin� on a pu� blic street� private street or a private driveway
more than 100 feet in length approved after the adopt�on of this tide shall be required to plant street trees in
accordance with the standar�ds in Section 18.745.040G
This proposed project has frontage along 90�'Avenue and on the proposed access drive to Lomita Avenue. Street trees
are reqwred along SW 90�' Avenue and along SW Lorruta, if there is space alon the cul-de-sac bulb. All street trees
must be �lanted in accordance with the standards for size and spacing u7 this u�e, under Section 18.745.040.G The
applicant s site plan shows street trees along 90`'' Avenue, but no size or species has been rop osed. The City Arborist
notes that there appears to be room f or three (3) large trees north of the dnveway and one �1) Iuge stature tree south of
the driveway. Street trees must be chosen f rom the approved City of Tigard street tree l�st.
NOTTC�, OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTION PAGE 11 OF 20
Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.745.050.5
The propo�sed land partition occu� on a parcel surrounded by the sa�ne land use designation (R 4.5) as the subject
parcel. Therefore, no buffering or screerung pursuant to Section 18J45.050.A is reqwred for the proposed land
partition. However, as discussed under the Minor Land Partition section of this decision, pnvacy screerun�g �s required
pursuant to section 18.420.OSO.A.4.f. The applicant has hedges to meet this requirement. The C'-aty Ar6orist
recommends _protecuon of the ex�sting hedge with 6-foot orange plastic construction fencing at a min�mum. The
applicant has 6een conditioned to show protecuon spec�fications tor the hedge.
FINDING: Based on the analys.is above, the Landscaping standards have not been fully met. However, if
the applicant comphes with the condition below the standards will be met.
GONDITTONS:
. Prior to building pernzit issuance, the applicant,shall submit a revised site plan for
review and approval that indicates the size7 speaes, and location of street trees along
90`'' Avenue and Lomita Avenue f or the Caty Arbonst's review and app roval. Spa�cu7g
of such trees shall be in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C2.C; of the Tigard
Development Code. A note may be placed on the��plan that states "slight vanations
in placement may be required, but every effort will be made to keep the same net
number of street trees that are shown on the plan."
. Prior to site work,the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval
showing protection spec�fications for the existing hedge on the north side of the
proposed access dnve to Parcel2.
Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements (18.765):
This Chapter is applicable�or development pro�ects when there is new const.ruction, expansion of existing
use, or cfiange of use in accordance with Sect�on 18J65.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking
Requirements.
The proposed partition will create one new lot for a single-farrvly residence. Table 18J65Z re qu�ires one (1) parking
space per room for group living uses. The existing residence has two off-street parking spaces within the garage and an
additional five (5) in the dnveway. For the new detached dwelling unit on Parcel 2, one (1) off-street parkuzg space
must be provided. There is no inaxunum luriit on parking allowed for detached single-family dwellings or group Lvu�g.
There is also no bicycle parkin�requirement. To ensure that the new home cor�structed in this deveIopment complies
with these standards,the followuig condition shall apply.
GONDITION: At the time of submittal for a building pemzit for the home on Parcel 2, the applicant shall
submit materials demonstrating that one (1� off-street parking space, which meets minimum
dimensional requirements and setback requu-ements as specified ui Title 18, will be provided
on-site for the new home.
Tree Removal(18.790):
Chapter 18.790.030 requires the submittal of a tree plan that identifies the location size and species of all trees
on the site a prograin to save existing trees over 1�-inch diameter at breast height (dbh) or mitigate for their
removal, ic�entificat�on of trees to be removed and a protection program defining standa�ls and methods that
will be used by the applicant to protect trees c�uring and after construction.
As required for partitions, the applicant submitted a tree plan conducted by Peter Torres, certified arborist. However,
the report does not contaui the four requu-ed components (see explanation below).
Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following:
1. Identification of the location, size and species of all e�sting trees including trees designated as
significant by the city;
The Arborist Report identified the location,size and species of all e�sting trees,consistent with this standard.
NOTIC� OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 20
2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper.
Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the
following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for
landscaping, streets and parking lots:
a. Retention of less than 25% of e�sting trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation
program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees;
b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existin�trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds
of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section f8.790.Q60D;
c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existin�trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 perrent
of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section T8.790.060D;
d. Retention of 75% or greater of exist�ng trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation.
There are a total of four (4 viable, non-fruit trees on site �re�ater than 12 inches which are subject to rrutigation (trees
68, 78, 80 &81). The app�cant states there are seven 7)• this number includes fruit trees. Fnut and orchard trees are
not subject to rruugauon. The�applicant's tree remov�p�an indicates the trees on the property that are to rernain and
those proposed for removal. OnZy one of the four viable trees �s being removed. This represents a 75% retention rate;
theref ore no mitigation is required.
3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed;
All of the trees proposed to be removed are identified in the applicant's site plan (C3.2) and A�-bor;st Reporc.
4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect
trees during and after construction.
This requirement has not been met. The fencing and tree protection specifications outlined in the arborist repon need
be transferred accurately to the site plans. S�-foot metal fencu�g is proposed. The tree protection plan needs to
address tree protection standards and methods for after construcuon. Spec�fically, they need to address acceptable
landscapin practices and materials around preserved trees. This additional inforn�ation can be provided on the site
plans as we�.
Section 18.790.040 states that any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be
removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of
a� pproval for a conditional use, and shall notbe subject to removal under any other section of this chapter.
The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development pemut
affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous
acco�ing to a certified arfiorisL The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree
preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a haza�ous tree. The form of
this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director.
The applicant has proposed retairung trees on-site; removal of such trees is restricted. A condition of approval will
ensure that this standard�s met.
Additional Tree Plan Requirements as outlined in the Febniary 26,2008 Directo�'s Interpretation.
A Director's Interpretation issued Febnia.ry 26, 2008 outlined tree plan requirements to be addressed by applicants that
were in addition to those found under 18.79.030. The Director's Interpretation was a�ppealed to the City Council on
March 14,2008. Ciry Council upheld the appeal on une 10,2008. The ap licant did address these requirements within
their narrative,but these items are no longer require�and are not specific�y addressed within this dec�sion.
FINDING: Based on the analysis abovet the Tree Removal standards will be met, if the applicant
complies with the conditions ]isted below:
GONDITTONS:
Tree Protection
. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit a revised site plan to the City Arborist for
review and approval showulg the location of the required tree protection fenculg (6-
foot metal),tree protection specifications, and tree protection zone dimensions to scale
in accordance with the Pro�ect Arbonst's report. The plan shall be signed by the
Project Arborist.
NO7TC�, OF DEQSION MLP2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTION PAGE 13 OF 20
. Prior to site work,the applicant shall�position fencin as directed bythe project arborist
to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant s�all position fencing as directed by
the project arborist in his report dated May 5, 2008 to protect the trees to be retained.
Fencuig shall be 6-foot metal. The applicant shall allow access by the City Arborist for
the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree
protection measures are perfomiuig adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or inauitain
tree protection fencuig m the designated locations shall be grounds for unmediate
suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be
processed.
. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall
prepare a proposal detailing the construction techniques to be emp loy�d and the likely
unpacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the Cary Arborist
before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone. The Caty Arborist
may requu-e changes prior to approval. The pro�ect arbonst shall be on site while work
is occurruig withui the tree protecuon zone and subrrut a surrunary report certifying that
the work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly impact the health and/or
stability of the trees. Th�s note shall be included on the Tree Protecuon Plan.
. The applicant shall have an on-goin�responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist
has submitted wntten reports to the ty Arborist, at least once every two weeks, as the
Project Arborist morutors the construction activiues from initial tree� protecuon zone
(TPZ) fencing installation through the building construction hases. The reports shall
evaluate the condition and location of the tree rotection �encing, detemluie �f any
changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part o�the Tree Protection Plan has been
violated. If the amount of TPZ was reduced, then the Project Arborist shall certify that
the construction activiues did not adversely unpact the overall, long-term health and
stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not subrrutted to the City Arbonst at the
scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protecuon Plan are not
being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the City can stop work on the
pro�ect unt�l an u�specuon can be done bythe CityArborist and the Project Arbonst.
. Prior to issuance of building perniits the applicant shall submit a building site plan to
the building� division indicatu-ig the �ocations of trees that were preserved on the lot
during site development. In addition, the plans shall include accurate locations of tree
canopy dnplines and protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the proJ�ect
arborist regarding the pl�a�cement and construcuon techniques to be employed in
building the structures. All proposed protection fencing�shall be installed and inspected
prior to commencing construction. The fencuig shall remain ui place through the
duration of all of the building construction phases, until the Certificate of Occupancy
has been approved.
. Prior to final inspection for each lot, the applicant shall submit a final report by the
Project Arbonst certifyu�g the health of protected trees and that the street trees were
properly planted per the approved street tree plan. Tree protection measures may be
removed and fu1a1 inspection authorized upon review and approval by the City
Arborist.
. Prior to issuance final building inspection, the applicant/owner shall record deed
restrictions to the effect that any e�sting tree greater than 6" diameter may be removed
only if the tree dies or is hazardous accorduig to a certified arbonst. The deed
restnction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in
accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree.
Visual Clearance Aieas (18.795):
T' s apter re uires ia�t t a ctear vision area shall be maintained on the corneis of all property adjacent to
intersecting righ�-of-way s or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area
shall contain no vehic i e, hed e, planting fence, wall structure, or femporary or permanent obstruction
exceedin� tlu�ee �3) feet in heig�� "I�he co�e provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall
be visua y clear etween three (3) and eight(8) feet in height Trees may be placed within this area provided
that all branches below eight ($a feet are removed. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by
measurin from the corner, 30-teet along the right-of-way and along the driveway and connecting these two
points wi�a straight line.
NOTIC� OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTION PAGE 14 OF 20
No existing or proposed structures are located within the visual clearance area. Tl�vs standard has been satisfied.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the Vision Clearance Standards are met.
Itnpact Study_(18390�
Section 18.360.090 states: "The Director shall make a finding with res�ect to each of the following criteria
when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application: '
Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of
development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the
study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the
development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users.
In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real propeity interests, the
applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide
evidence that supports that the real property dedicat�on is not roughly propo�tional to the projected impacts
of the develo men� Section 18.390.D40 states that when a condition of ap roval requires tlie transfer to the
public of an interest in real properly, the approval authority shall adopt findings whicFi support the conclusion
that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly propo�onal to the impact the proposed
development will have on t�►e pubLc.
The applicant has submitted an impact stu�dy. The home on Parcel 1 will continue to use e�sting utility hook up s and
the e�sting dnvewayto SW 90`}'Avenue. The new home on Parcel2 will connect to e�sting water,sarutary, andstorm
lines in Lomita Avenue. No improvements are proposed for 90�' Avenue or Lomita Avenue, but street trees will be
provided. Additional ri�ght-of-way will be dedicated along both frontages to meet cun-ent standards. Parks system
development charges will be collected for the new home at building permit�ssuance as well as traffic impact fees.
The Washin�ton County Traffic Impact Fee (7TF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development.
Based on Washington County figures TIFs are expected to recapture 20 percent of the traffic impact of new
development on the Collector and Artenal Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approxunately
$3,390 (Effective July 1,2008) per new dwelling urut.
Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 20 percent of the impact on major street im rovements citywide, a fee
that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $16,950 ($3,390 drvided by.20� The difference between
the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the ururutigated un act on the sueet system; therefore the unrruugated
impact of th�s pro�ect is $13,560 ($16,950 - $3,390). Both 90`�' �treet and L.omita Avenue are partiall�y improved;
therefore the appl�cant is re�quu-ed to enter uito future agreements for the rec�uired improvements. Dedication �s
re uired along both streeu. Two feet of dedication �s necessary along the SW 90 frontage and �s estimated at $775.80
(1�9.3 lineal teet x 2 ft x$3.00/square foot). The site also has trontage along SW Lomita Avenue,a local street. Fifteen
teet of right-of-way dedication �s required to meet current standards for a cul-de-sac. Dedication along Lomita is
approxunately218 sguare feet and�s estunated at$654 (218 x$3.00/sq.ft). Total cost of dedication is $1,429.80,which
is Iess than the uruiutigated impact of $13,560. Therefore the dedicataon is roughly proportionate to the impact of the
proposed development.
PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS
Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810):
Chapter 18.810 provides constiuction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and
utilit�es such as streets, sewers,and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Sect�on 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in
accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing
street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC.
NOTTC� OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTTON PAGE 15 OF 20
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Neighborhood Route (_Local
Street) to have a 54 foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may
include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, stomi drainage, and
street trees.
T�vs site lies adjacent to SW 90th Avenue,which is classified as a local street on the Ciry of Tigard Transponation Plan
Map. At present, there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's
map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from centerLne.
SW 90th Avenue is currently partially imp roved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant
should plant street trees and enter into a future streets improvement agreement for the remaining unprovements.
71us site lies adjacent to SW Lomita Avenue, a�hich is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Tr�ansportation
Plan Ma�. At present, there u approxui�ately 40 feet of ROW radius from centerline, according to the most recent tax
assessor s map. The standard requu-es the muiunum curb radius within the bulb to be 40 feet. With the additional 11
feet for the curb, sidewalk and lanter strip the required ROW from centerline shall be a 51 foot radius. The applicant
should dedicate the additional�OW to provide 51 feet from centerline.
SW Lomita Avenue is currently panially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the
applicant should plant street trees and enter into a future streets unprovement agreement for the rema�n,ng
unprovements.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed
which shows the pattem of existing� and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land
division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future
division of ad'oining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a
bamcade sha� be constructed at the end of the street These street stubs to adjoining properties are not
considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at suc-h time as the
adjoining property is developed. A bamcade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the �roperty
owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be mcluded
in the street construction cosL Tem ora�y hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be
constructed for stub streets in excess o�150 feet in length.
The property is bounded on two sides by local streets and on the other two sides by existing residential development.
There are no opponunities or needs for future streets or extensions of streets through this property.
Street Ali nment and Connections:
Section 1�.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between
connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-
existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restnct�ons e�cisting prior to May 1
1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulatec�
water feature if regulations would not permit constcuction.
Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a
development site shall be e�ctended within t�ie site to provide through cirrulation when not precluded by
environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other
standards in this code. A street connection or e�rtension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or
reconfi�ure the street pattem to�rovide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained
if the slope is greater than 15/o for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or
topograptucal constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection
is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection.
The property is bounded on two sides by local streeu and on the other two sides by e�vsting residential development.
There are no oppomuuties or needs for future streets or e�ctensions of streets through this propercy.
Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.L states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access
to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topo raphical constraints,
exist�ng development pattem, or strict adherence to other standa�ls in this code prec�ude street extension
and through cirrulat�on:
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTTON PAGE 16 OF 20
. All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a tumaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than
cirrular, shall be approved by the City Engineer,and
. The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured from the centerline intersection point of the two streets
to the radius point of the bulb,and
. If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be
required to be provided and dedicated to the City.
Slock Desi ns - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with
due rega�to providing adequate buildin sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for
converuent access, cirrulation, control an� safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and
opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800
feet measured along the right-of-way line except
. Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wedands or other bodies of water or, pre-
e�sting development or,
. For blocks adjacent to arterial streets,limited access highways,major collectois or railroads.
. For non-residential blocks in which internal public cinculation provrdes equivalent access.
The site is located at the end of a cul-de-sac. Existing homes are located where the street would be placed. These
parcels are not large enough to be re-developed undcr the current zoning. Due to existin development surrounding
the property there are no possible street connections or oppomuiities to create shorter b�ock lengths that meet the
current standard.
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or n�ght-of-
ways shall be provided when full street connection is not�ossible. Spacing between connections shall be no
more than 330 feet, exce�t where precluded by envrronmental or topographical constraints, e�usting
development patterns, or stnct adherence to other standa�is in the code.
L�ue to the placement of homes surrounding the property, a bicycle/pedestrian connection is not possible at this time.
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average
lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the mirumum lot size of the applicable zoning district�
Parcel 1 is less than 1.5 times the i7ununum lot size 7,500 x 1.5 = 11,250). Parcel 1 is 15,447 square feet. The average
lot width Parcel 1 is 129 feet,so 2.5 x 129 =322.5. �arcel 1 is 136 feet at the deepest point. This standard is met.
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private
streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c ap lies, which requires a pancel to
either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a mimmum 15-foot wide reco�ed access easemen� In cases
where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit,the frontage shall be at least 15 fee�
Parcel 1 has 129 feet of street frontage along SW 90th Avenue. Parcel 2 has 19 feet of frontage on Lomita Avenue
through an access flag.
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be
located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private stmets and industrial streets
shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant shall enter into a future street improvement agreement for SW 90th and SW Lomita Avenues,which will
include public sidewalks,thereby meeting this cnterion.
Sanitary Seweis:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new
development and to connect developments to existing mains m accorclance with the provisions set forth in
Design and Construction Standards}or Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by C1ean Water
Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the
comprehensive plan.
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional
development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan.
NOTTC� OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTION PAGE 17 OF 20
There is a public sewer line located in SW 90th Avenue and a lateral that serves the e�sting home. There is a public
sewer line uz SW Lomita Avenue that ternlinates at a manhole. The applicant's plans show a lateral e�ension from the
manhole to serve the proposed parcel.
Storni Draina�e:
General Provis�ons: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for stotm
water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility
shall be lar�e enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area,whether inside
or outside tlie developmen� The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility based on the
pro� visions of Design and Construction Standards for Sarutary and Surface Water Management�as adopted by
C:lean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer
that the additional runoff resulti�ng from the development will overioad an exist�ng draina e facility, the
Director and En ineer shall withFold approval of tl�e development until provisions have �een made for
improvement of �e potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff
caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standa�is for Sanitary and
Surface Water Management(as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
In 1997, C1ean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek
Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments inctitute a
stonnwater detention/effective imp ervious area reduction prog ram resulting in no net increase ui storm peak flows up
to the 25-year event. The City wi11 require that all new developments resulting ui an increase of unpervious surfaces
provide onsite detention faciliues,uriless the develo�pment is located adjacent to Fanno Creek For those developments
adjacent to Fanno Creek,the storm water nuloff wiIl be permitted to d�scharge without detention.
The G�X/S standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partiuons. It would
be unpractical to require an on-site water quantiry facility to accommodate the storm water from ITarcel 2. Rather, the
CW5 standards prov�de that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a faciliry if deemed appropriate. Staff
recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication,
lighting and cable television sernces and related facilities shall be placed under�round, except for surface
mounted tr•ansformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above
ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000
volts or above, and:
. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the
underg round services;
. The �ty reserves the ri�ht to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
. All underground utilit�es, incIuding sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the
developer, shall be constnicted�p norto the surfacing of the streets; and
. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid distu�fiing the street improvements when
service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-
lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where e�sting
utilities which are not undetground will serve the development and the approval authority deternunes that the
cost and technical difficulty of under-groundin� the ut�lities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in
conjunction with the developmen� The deterniination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common,
but not the only such situat�on is a short frontage development for which under- rounding would result in
the placement ot�additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities�acilities. An applicant for
a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public
right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding.
NOTIC�',OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTITION PAGE 18 OF 20
There are existin overhead utility lines along the fronta e of SW Fonner Street nonh side).� If the fee in-lieu is
proposed,it is equgal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street fron age that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this
site�s 129.31ineal feet;therefore the fee would be $4,525.50.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY
IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS:
Fire and Life Safe :
The applicant as submitted a Fire Hydrant Flow Test Report, dated 4/22/2008, provided b�y Tualatin Valley Water
District. The report indicates that flow at 20 psi residual pressure (calculated)���s 1086 �p m. The hydrant is located at
the northwest corner of the subject propertywitlun the SW 90th Avenue ROW. TVF&R requu-es a m�rnmum of 1000
gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. Tlus hydrant provides adequate flow.
Public Water S stem:
Tualatin V �e�y Ua�ter District ('IVWD p�rovides service in this area. The applicant must submit plans for review and
approval to 1vWD prior to issuance o�City of Tigard pernuts.
Stonn Water Qualit�
The City has agreed to enfo�e Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by C1ean Water
Seivices (CWS) Design and Construction Standards.(adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which
require the construct�on of on-site water quality facilrties. The facilities shall be desi ned to remove 65
percent of the phosphonu contained in 100 pe�ent of the storm water runoff�enerated �rom newly created
impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and
method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year.
The CWS standaxds include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partitions. It would
be impractical to require an on-site water qualiry facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from Parcel 2.
Rather, the C� standards provide that appIicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed
appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application.
Grading and Erosion Control:
CWS Desi n and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and
other po�utants reaching the public storrn and surface water system resulting from development,
construct�on, gradin�, excavatin�, clearin , and any other activity wluch accelerates erosion. Per CWS
regulations, the applicant is required to su�mit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to
issuance of City permits.
The applicant shall submit an Erosion Control plan for review and approval with the PFI Perinit application.
Address Assi nments:
e Ciryo Tiga is responsible for assigning addresses for�parcels witlun the Ciryof Tigard. An addressing fee in the
amount of$50.00 per address shall be assessed. Tfus fee shall be paid to the Citypnor to}inal plat approval.
Surve Re uirements•
The applicant's ina plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates AD 83�(9_ 1)] on two monuments with a tie to the
Cit�s global positiorung system (GPS) geodetic control network�GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line
and shall be of the same prec�sion as requu-ed for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat
shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to gnd measurements and the angle from north to gnd
nonh. These coordinates can be established by:
. GPS tie networked to the Cit}�s GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveyuig methods.
In addition, the applicant's as-built drawin s shall be tied to the GPS network The applicant's en ineer shall provide
the City with an electromc f�le with points�or each structure (inanholes, catch basins, water valves,�ydrants and other
water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD
83 (91).
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTITION PAGE 19 OF 20
SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
The Cit}�s Building Division reviewed the proposal and had no objections.
The City of Tiga�i Public Wor�s Departrnent and Tigard Police were also sent copies of the proposal. No
coiYUnents were subnutted to the Planrung Drvision.
SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS
C1ean Water Services has reviewed the prop osal. The plan was reviewed b�y Clean Water Services. A sewer
connection pernut has been issued. A copyof the pernut�s found in the land use file (NII.P2008-00005).
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was sent a copyof the proposal,but no comments were received.
SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice: Notice was mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Oamer of record a�ithin the required distance
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 29,2008 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON SEPT'EMBER 16,2008 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
�Deal:-
The D-irector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise
adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Secuon 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in
accordance tivith Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a vvritten
aPpeal together with the re�quired fee shall be filed with the Director withui ten (10) business.days of the date the Notice
o} Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and fom�s are available from the Plaruvng Division of Tigard City
Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the
specific issues ident�fied in the wntten comments subrrutted by the parties during the comment period. Additional
evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be subirutted by any party dunng the appeal
hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that maybe adopted from tune to tune bythe appelIate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 15,2008.
�estion_s:
It }rou have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Plaruiing Division, T'�igard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,
Tigard,Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
Q- �%�-��-J A t 28 2008
PREPARED . e Caines ATE
Associate Planner
�------_..�
�.
� _ -, , _
. `�. ,N--�. , August 28,2008
APPROVED BY: Ric ar Bewers DATE
Plaruung Mana e
NOTIC�' OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTION PAGE 20 OF 20
� �—, -- _ --- ------ ----,--`-_i I j — ' D _ - . - .
� ( i � I I - ---- ' -- - I 2' � ' �—T-------- �
�1 i � �--- ------L-- -' ! - I- r i VICINITY MAP�M
- �
;
w - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
� �
< ._, �
I� , _ ---- --- ,
���� _� '---� ; - �; � ��, � --- --- �- --- �--- � MLP2008-00005
_�-� � '� � � �`��� �� ( � � �� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
� � �--o -- �- ; � �--! ` �Y `��, I--- REPTA
� � � � _ - � � I'-�' ' �-��� �� � � PARTITION
� ! � � � � � � � � �
�� � �
� DAKOTA ST � ;
� � ��� � � �---�� �
-- r I I�
1 — < �
0 � �
_� � w � - - LEGEND:
> ,
F---i� - - i
i� I � �-�_ � '�/J SUBJECT �
--- I Q i �-I� / � SITE ,
i � �� ---�
-- - Q i'`- -, ; ' �
�-- � �.�� M�
� E�� z,� � , �
- --�,- � 5 C�° ��
�
- -��i i �-_ y<�� - : � �
:.; i` �
�iR. � ��� � � —�� � � � � �f� y ; �
� ����•�� I � �" �c �wM�r s,c I
� /V � '
RGI — I i�EGF 6EnD til l / �;IIH!>:.I ✓0 _ I
� _� r _ � �
' tnJ ` (
I � � I�—.._—� � = I T�garCMeaMap
�°-,. �°' !--�--� -�- � i N - - -- -
0,`1'� � LOMITA -
� ��
��— , o ,00 zoo 30o aoo soo F�i
I1"=387 feet �I.
� � �� ��I r!'' �
Af�l I E LA -- p� � �.y_�
LN i � G �+1.�= x
I i p r::
� ---�
I� �^A'�C LA�+V I w�_.--,I..__- ,�w� _ i Information on tMS map is(or general locahon only and I
li
C I
� �. >� should be verified wdh the Deoelopment Services Division.
�i� I �� __ Q , 13125 SW Hall BWU
I Q Tiqard,OR 97223
�- ------- � I--_-- � � � I (5031639-4171
. I ��4 -- --��—�--�— \ -- -- -----
� � � � � �ttp:llwrvw.cl.ligard.or.us
Community Development Plot date:Jul 1,2008;C:ImagiclMAGIC03.APR
, ,
, ,,�.
,:�, ��
I ; ".
�
t �
� , -- ��a.—_ 1` �-- __.L.�CaJ�-..w�__
- _.. �4. .._...�4�. �..yti,. h ' 1 ��� f..a� n
+ I ��i I - - - - - - -�- - -��`T- - - �t� c�`��" � ,� ...� f M.w arr
� � �I � . � . f�s n �- Ir `n c-` ( ;
� ` � �J .��.v:,�, '�k.���_`,, I �.f 1 1' L ',�"_,
. '' � g ..,.�._�^, },tta'r�� {_��r,> �������ro'w�� � -�- - - -�-�-�� I SfTE
� � � 6�S'_ _y�: L� �,) 1 .,�I �� I 1
I I M � � •`i��.S; J hr.ft_oS" .�h_.x �. I -rLr�??; ,
_ � I �,� t.r. � � .� b,��wa is; - �=�
� � , ,- t,��;, , � ; ��� �
��
, � �� i„ r � � __ __1
�: �.
� i� . ' I � -.. » Ls'� � ! f _
,
�.F
:�.
' '° : i �;, _ r..m _ J ' � -;'��`
I � •. � _ �4�6fr�`
... r- �°-
i . .,._�_y �__ � ti
>�
�' _?: I __—__......_—� I ���
---
i� � '�'I� � � __. _._.__- .__..._ �� )� I i � '-�� S �
� .rt� � .,. �:_, - I .� :'�J.
(�{� ��il`�•.�i �
: I I� :� �� 1�j`- .,�' � I- �__.---__.- i I '.�ii�`.�I ��I1��� VICINITY MM
a�: e I � � 1 I� � �u � ���w I i:.�'h,�i ` � is
G I',
S I � i � (1 '.,(t.a - I I � � �� j, .
� � I I � � PMCEL 1 •„�- <"�I.f Z �.
� �. ....I 1 � ' �swr s I � ��,,�X' PARCEL 4 ��� ."v� �
__
--_..... _..._ 1 l. '--.-1., I ; 1--�__ /����� �n+w s .Z_�'L.,�4
�' , I T � � �i ��I �I I ����� .. ' �� 'i
� .� OwM MaR r
v
_ I �I � I�y l ^� � I I lo IdM� I i ��� � �. �M � � .._...."___...- ... �
1 I
. 6• /'y � I ��1 I
I .: �i, S J I .�... I . ��� /i�_ `M1�� �7f w aTM° - � i
♦„�,y .� � � ,
b � � � � � ]f ... ' � � � �
i �L . .._ �� `� i i
� �
�
� __::� -,-- { - �
� � - I I'�y,� ,if'I�i��-e� / � I i I _ r-r 1 ns�naae on.na.-an ..(� T� i�../ t_` n: II �� � �� �
� "` t3 Z,°� � t
� � . .._�_.._� Ili l� I ___I _- ---_ `-iit-��';�' � � �
---- }-- � �a�-�.,{ �_ __,__.._�....�_ I •�� ` 1 �I � p I
I � � �
� � i , �.;�..�/t;S f.,_5 � � � � {� 1 -- a �� P I
,
., I ��u.+..owia.�. I ; f I � L � � � �I �..—.._ I ��" � ' i
- - - - - -
� i .__ } _-�i 1 .�' I � � -_ __ _ _ -�- - - _ I __.
� __
_ . .
� -------------- --------- -
: __.
, :- , , \ _, __. � ,,.��'�� � -__ • �.�,a�A — —,-.ti. — — "-�''�1�
i� � : �:, � 1O�er _ � _ � �..
- -- —�' , �. ,. . �.
—--
L^' �
, — -- -- --- — -- ) � �-
, _.
, , �.
_.J 1 � _ �
: 1 ' II tro�Sl)� Y `�.� �"�� ����vi.��� �___11�IQ _ _____�___ __ %��y+.'
: � }..L���-�������������������� ������� �� .
. ; � � f�'lfiP i tOI.K "se �a, �v�( r7►�t'[ t7L •�,�v •
� � �_ �,4� � 4= �sroa • .' .
; � �� . i . .__..._._ i �
. � (��- _.-----, `�. :��ir..,., � - -- - � '� '-- I
. i � I �i t I r � I� /'���J �\\.:
i
l
I �.- ��/ �
�el�o�gs �y' I`� �
p.�,.���� �� I j� ,
fo Rr n innw re es m nnH �� �I � 1+\;
R niso�m eww � ' � �'�
pp Ta nncoi roa�m1a, a�nrr.00r aoc ___,_ ouw.�no.oano� � `i
aesnw�rmNaus Nu.e.on� �s mm���m ^°10°11°'�""°� 1 �, x �
rEw wvrnNOUS uu-aan s pp m�,.n,r si.wwr e.�u.. ,.--. --- n�venr ui
ta�m auw iaaio mar ,..t,,.. -nsm�mr ww �
O �-a„ ,,� ----nvmwnr+ao I .
6 00l.T A OIfIM W�LLL 1 i �:�� .
��-?`f�.:;�anr.a�om mi w�vm.�na��.wa ��nv�rna�aa \
Q r wia�roc��r a o�nw rw ui w[�uiwa r mort rda qva��or a[r+mi - �� i
�MfMI SI�M1a ltla MO 1'Q11Q U[ ' e .� .
i.---....s.___....��._�---� ---�°- • O wau�a aia wi 7REE PltolECnoN �>;t' ' �;, � I .
c �
� �=I IV�L�aPP�O1JAL o�:��,.,� ��O ���; ,��.� _ i 1 ;i ; ;
� GITY �� �flGllFi4J P�.li.r�NM�('a Catb���i�� � c�osrnnar.n ,� I i j
� Q�srr�t m a�w �.
� y ��uwrr os�w/warn[sw� � REPTA 91E E/10/bE
� ��,vr�z
Q ww�r wo:�m nm ra orr�rons �PFPfMA�N ww ia
p .� /�-7�r p� ^f/� p ��s��aio nn�o�r mar+a TRT ENGINEERING.MC.
� L?�� _ _��__ �:'-t t G V_A_(^ O O... � ��snu�wo r�wir�mz Mao�vair urt \,`,��// .v r� �`"a"�"aico.� ,. �TCARD.OttEWM 97Y1J �
_- _ �� Q�ow�ns���s�ro m ��a�.� �a.cixi�n�,»:'f �osr n
__._.. ...... -- -..__.......r..�..__ - - .,.m ,._ .�._,_. m��mo.rmnwicno� VYbSD' �C� :��: ..�b��»�,+.� SITE PLAN/PARTITION
i
���
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
.,
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2008-00005 :
REPTA PARTITION
(Includes a 30 day extension) 120 DAYS = 11/10/2008
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: REPTA PARTITION
CASE NOS.: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2008-00005
Adjustment (VAR) VAR2008-00022
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to partition one (1) existing .62 acre site
into two (2� parcels. The e�cisting residence on Parcel 1 will remain and is used for senior
care with five 5) residents, which is a perniitted use within the zone. Parce12 will be used
for a new sing�e-family residence. Parcel 1 will be 15,477 square feet and Parcel 2 will be
10,448 square feet. An Adjustment has also been requested to the Street Improvement
Standards to allow access from Parcel 2 onto the Lomita Avenue cul-de-sac. The maxirnum
allowed units is twenry(20) onto cul-de-sacs. Thi.s maX;mum is currently exceeded because
there are eight �8) single-farrvlyuruts, ten (1O�duplexes, and approximatelyeighty-eight (88)
multi-family uruts that have access onto SW orruta Avenue. The adjustment wi7l allow the
applicant to increase that number by one additional unit.
APPLICANT & Vasile Repta APPLICANT'S Campbell Planning&Development,Inc.
OWNER: 11400 SW 90`''Avenue REP.: Attn:Doug Campbell
Tigard, OR 97223 3851 SW 50`�'Avenue
Portland, 4R 97221
COMPRE HE NSIVE
PLAN
DESIGNATION: R 4.5;Low DensityResidential.
ZONE: R 4.5 Low Densi Residential. The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate
detache sing e- amily homes with or without accessory residential units at a mm�mum lot size
of 7,500 square feet. DuPlexes and attached sin le-farrvly uni�s are perniitted conditionally.
Some civic and uistitutional uses are also pern�itte�conditionally.
LOCATION: 11400 SW 90`'' Avenue;WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lot 2900.
PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 15,447 Square Feet.
PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 10,448 Square Feet.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: Communitv Development Code Chapters 18.370 (Variances and Ad1�ustments ; 18.390
(Decision-l�laking Procedures�; 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning istricts);
18.705 (Access Egress and Cu-culation); 18J15 (Density Computations); 18J45 (Landscap�ng
and Screenin�; 18J65 (Off-Street parking and Loading; Reqwremenu); 18J90 (T'ree
Removal)• 18. 95 (V�sual Clearance Areas); and 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement
Standardsj.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of T"igard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the
above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at
� City Hall.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be
obtained for twenry-five cents (25C) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the tune of the request.
SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owner of record within the required distance
X Af f ected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 29, 2008 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 16, 2008 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
DA- � e—al-: .
The llirector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are othervv�se
adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as�provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in
accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a
written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director wrthui ten (10) busu7ess days of the
date the Notice of Dec�sion was ma�led. The appeal fee schedule and foc-ms are available from the Plannuig
Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the
specific issues identified in the wntten comments subirutted by the parties during the comment period. Additional
evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be subirutted by any party dunng the appeal
hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted f rom tune to tune by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2008.
Fo�estions:
er information�please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Che Caines at (503) 639-4171, Tigard
City Hall, 13125 SW HaII Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 or by email to c e c ti ard-or. ov.
�. -
— > _
. r
_ �
� � ....... ............
a �ZCIN7I'1 M.�f'
,y _ TILI='==�_,_;__
�iy - -
xErT.�
��� I'.�RTITIc:�N
A 5T
<
w
>
LEGENU:
SPEJF�T
a'IZE
� Y1
' ❑
�FFN Y'i.i, �
eURC �
i
/ ��_
>0
o�`�' MITA N
lA
LN
T A C > ..�, ,,,,.
<
nM � aM� . ..�qc...
.ij ,.
-- �-- .t�Fi---------"'----- �- al^ (Laj.
.� n� � _•'�- ^�t'� <'�"�:. °�.r���! ��r2 r� �
i � �O :,� 7 f- -r- -�l
_� a i
j�; fi£::,� ; � Q�. ` � �--�._ :�
'� ,."�< <r'�"i -- �a _.�_ �
�� t�t:' � �
5 --�--� J '� C'�
�..I� Ii_��[��C'" � �-----------�it"�ti .��Ril/ �. 1,•: i �
�i c�- i��, ��1'Rr
�� � . ���.� ' ��J_ � �
��___�r-�J L---� l •° �� �---.__ _. �''I
� I � w ���l, I II ` t � � i �_ — '
��� �,� � ! '
�' � � � �- ,
I � ��T --- I' r aa �' ,�q- � � � i I �
�.�I j ��.� � ��I •Ca i __ _y I_ _--_ I I �.�. � I I
i � I I i _�� .� \ .e�'3� �� �� i
�� �
�I � ---- � � i ,
�; , r--- _„�-�-- -- �--,�
,: ,-- .
.- .
, ... .�
.� L -- � E�' ---�_ - �.�7.� ——— —
, i ---._.__.��. a� r a ��� - - - --
II ----- - . : .. ..- - - -
�I , .'. �---� - ----- ---- �i
i i �`'—'--rsar-----za---- w� ...__ _-
i •=.M�"
� � +;� � -� ��, I
.oss.�ss� I�t�j +,���
� ms:s`—�.� ��e-.c �_=-= ` I�E
o...��=_ �.,.�; m:r:�+Q � �\ I
m�,..___.�_ • "'_.— �
�INAL.APPROVAL ��"' �
I----- —� -�=o ��,-•-- j �1 �
i?r�nc�r�o rww+no dwsroa+ m°'�''�""
� I s�
B"C.Ca+.n[i JnrE B-.�9-oB � e�t2lttssst �, s'�w .iw.
`—---- -- eSS'L,Kyy���� � � n[n.� .�.na O
NOTIC�TO MORTGAC�E,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER
Tf� TTGARD D��ZLOPNIEl�ri' CODE RLQLJIRES TI-L�T IF YOU RECEIVE T�IIS NOTTC�, IT SHALL BE PROMP'7T_Y
FOR�'ARDED TO THE PLRC�-I�SER
"RE VISE D"
NOTICE OF PENDING '�
LAND USE APPLICATION °
MINOR LAND PARTITION • � •
THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN REVISED TO INCLUDE A REQUEST FOR AN ADJUSTMENT TO THE STREET
IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS AS DF_SCRIBF.D IN ITALICS BELOW. THE DUE DATE FOR THE COMMENT
PERIOD AND THE TENTATIVE DECISION DATE HAVE BEEN EXTENDED ACCORDINGLY.
DATE OF NOTICE: August 12, 2008
FILE NOS.: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 20�8-00005
ADJUSTME NT (VAR) 2008-00022
FILE TITLE: REPTA PARTITION
APPLIC.ANT/ APPLICANT'S
OWNER Vasile &Lidia Repta REP.: Campbell Planning&Development,Inc.
11400 SW 90�h Avenue Attn: Doug Campbell
Tigard, OR 97223 3851 SW 50�h Avenue
Portland,OR 97221
REQLJEST: The applicant is requesting approval to Partition one 25,879-square foot (0.62-acre) lot into two lou of 15,477
square feet and 10,448 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain the existing sui�gle-family home on Lot 1
and build a new single-family detached home on Lot 2. Proposed Lot 2 will be a flag lot. AnAdjustm�u lxrs
also l�n �este�to th�e St�I�r}7�arem�u Starz�anls to allozvrivrE tlazn 20 zrr�izs to aass arno a cul d�sac Thrs rrmcvnrm
is e�c���a�se tl�r are as»eruly 18 sir�famly urats a�zl apprmcirrut�'y 39 multi farrily wnts tlxu Ixize aa�ss auo SW
L o�rira A zern�
LOCATION: 11400 SW 90�Avenue;Washington CAUntyTax Map 1S135DA,Tax Lot 2900.
ZONE: R 4.5: Low Density Residential. The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family
homes with or a�ithout accessory residential units ac a minim� lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and
attached single-family units are pemutted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also pemutted
conditionally.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA Corrunurury Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18J05, 18J15, 18J30, 18J45,
18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby rovided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written
comments on the apphcation to the City. THE FOURTEEN �14) DAY PERIOD ENDS A? 5:00 PM ON
AUGUST 26, 2008. All commenu should be directed to Cheryl Caines, Assciate Planner (�437) in the Plannuig Division at the
City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the Ciry of Tigard by telephone at 503-639-4171
or bye-ma�l to cher.ylc tigard-or.gov.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE
DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-
MAKING PROCESS
THE QTY OF TIGARD APPREQt. .i RECEIVING CONIIv1ENTS AND VA �S YOUR INPUT. COMI��NTS WILL
BE CONSIDERED AlVD ADDRESSED WITf-IIN THE NOTIC:E OF DEQSION. A DEQSION ON T�-IIS ISSLTE IS
TENTATTVELY SQ-�DULED FOR AUGUST 29,2008. IF YOU PROVIDE COMI��NTS,YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY
OF '17� FULL DEQSION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COM1v1ENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF
THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CON'TAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMA7'ION:
• Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be
ap�licable to this proposal;
• Raue anyissues and/or concerns believed to be important aith sufficient evidence to allowthe Cityto provide a response;
• Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with
sufficient specificiry on that issue.
FAILURE OF ANY PART'Y TO ADDRESS T'HE RELEVANT APPROVAL C�ZITERIA WITH SLIFFIQENT SPEQFIQTY
MAY PREQ.UDE SUBSEQUENT APPEALS TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS OR QRCLJIT COURT ON
THAT ISSUE. SPEQFIC FINDINGS DIRECTED AT "I'I� RELEVANT APPROVAL GRITERIA ARE WHAT
CONSTT7ZTTE RELEVANT EVIDENC�.
AFTER TZ-IE 14-DAI' CO;v1h1E:�T PERIOD QOSES, Tf� DIREC'TOR SHALL ISSLJE A T�'PE II ADMINISTRAT'IVE DEQSION. T�-IE
DIRECTOR'S DEQSION SHALL BE MAILED TO TI--IE APPLIC�NT AND TO OV�I�IERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500
FEET OF THE SUBJEGT SITE,AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITI'EN COMIv1ENTS OR WHO IS OTI-IERWISE ENTITL.ED TO
NOTTC�. T��, DIRECTOR'S DEC:[SION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF Tf3E RELEVANf APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA
AND TI-IE FACTS CONTAINED�RTHIN THE RECORD,TI-IE DIRECI'OR SHALL APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY Tf�E
REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACI'ION.
SLTMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
• The application is accepted by the City
• Notice u sent to property owners of record a�ithin 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written
comment period.
• The application is reviewed by>City Staff and affected agencies.
• City Staff issues a written decision.
• Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record
of property located a7thin 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized
neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an
intergovernmental agreement entered into a7th the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise
entitled to such notice.
INPORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written conunents and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained
��thin che record and are available for public review at the Ciry of Tigard Communiry Development De artment. If y�u want to
inspect the file,please call and make an appointment alth either the project planner or the plaiuiuig technicians. �pies of these ttems may
be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be
directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written
Conunents."
> �
� —
, i �7t�INITT M�1' '
i
f— `________
,y All_I'3��3-�::'v'v;
!yy __'__"__
REPTA
�>> I:�RTI"T1ON
ST
>
LEGEND.
� SI.�EJE�T
TTE
r -1
❑ �{
Cl7Ff.Ne t'+ .� - �
v�
j�.
�O
OMIT4 �
lA
�N
TA AC > .... ...s
a
.�.�w.e� Ms+�� a as• t . mwenu
Storm Water Connection PermitAuthorization
��
���
���
CleanWater Services
Our c��n�uiitn��nf i, cic�ir.
Permit Num6er
MLP 2008-00005
This authorization to issue a Storm Water Connection Permit in accordance with the requirements of Resolution
and Order 07-20,section 3.01.2,when signed and dated by the District,verifies that the District has reviewed the
construction plans,as submitted by the City,and concurs that they are in accordance with either I)the Service
Provider Letter(SPL),2)the Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment issued for the project and acting as
the SPL,or; 3)the Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment acting as the SPL issued for project compliance
with the District's water quality protection standards. This authorizes the Jurisdictional City to issue a Stormwater
Connection Permit for the project.
If modifications occur after the issuance of this letter which create a violation of the Service Provider Letter,then
the Permit becomes null and void.
It is the responsibility of the Jurisdictional City to notify Clean Water Services of changes that effect
the Service Provider Letter.
Service Provider Letter Number: 08-001058 Date of Service Provider Letter: April 21,2008
Map and Tax Lot#: 1S1 35DA-02900 Project Name: Repta Partition
Doug
Campbell/Campbell
Developer/Applicant: Planning 8 Dev. Jurisdictional City: Tigard
Comments:
Laterals shall follow chapter 5.09.3 for design and per 5.09.3 (e)shall contain no bends in the side sewer,
which is defined per chapter 1.03.56 as that portion of the private sanitary or storm sewer extending from
the public sanitary or storm sewer main to the edge of the public ROW or boundary of a conveyance
easement dedicated to CWS or the City.
CONCLUSION
The City, in accepting this Authorization for permit and authorizing the partition of the Tax/Map lot, certifies that all
portions of this partition have complied with CWS Design and Construction Standards, R&O 07-20 and have been
reviewed and approved by the Jurisdictional City for proposed partition lot sewer serviceability.
Sto t o o Permit authorized by: Date:
7/7/2008
David Schw rtrer, EIT.
E:\Development Svcs\Plan Review\Storm Water Connection\StormWaterConnectionPermits�2008\Tigard MLP2008-00005 Re��dQ�n 7-7
.x s
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SF.i.i.F.R.
THL TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THA'T IF 1'OU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY
FOR��'ARDED TO THE PURCHASER.
NOTICE OF PENDING ��
.
LAND USE APPLICATION '
MINOR LAND PARTITION � ' '
DATE OF NOTICE: July 3, 2008
FILE NO.: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2008-00005
FILE TITLE: REPTA PARTITION
APPLICANT/ APPLICAN?'S
OWNER: Vasile & Lidia Repta REP: Campbell Planning& Development, Inc.
11400 SW 90`'' Avenue Attn: Dou Campbell
Tigard, OR 97223 3851 SW 5� Avenue
Portland, OR 97221
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to Partition one 25 879-square foot (0.62-acre) lot into
two lots of 15,477 square teet and 10,448 square feet. T�e applicant proposes to retain the
existing single-family hame on Lot 1 and build a new single-family detached home on Lot 2.
Proposed Lot 2 will be a flag lot.
LOCATION: 11400 SW 90`h Avenue; Washington County Tax Map 1S135DA, Tax Lot 2900.
'LONE: R-4.5: Low Densit Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate
etac e sing e- ami y omes wit or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot
size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted
conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18J05, 18J15, 18J30,
18J45, 18.765, 18.790, 18J95 and 1R.810.
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to t e City ma ing any ecision on t e App ication, you are herebv provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit
written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON
ULY 17, 2008. All comments should be directed to Cher}�1 Caines, Assciate Planner (k2437� in the Planning Division at
t e City o igard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reac t e Crty of Tigard by telephone at
503-639-4171 or by e-mail to chervlcQti�ard-or.�ov.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON
THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS
WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS
ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR ULY 28, 2008. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE
SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE I HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL
BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING
INFORMATION:
• .4ddress the specific "Applicable .__view Criteria" described in the section ._��ve or any other criteria believed to be
applicable to this proposal;
• Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a
response;
• Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval
criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue.
FAILURE OF ANY PARTY TO ADDRESS THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA WITH SUFFICIENT
SPECIFICITY MAY PRECLUDE SUBSEQUENT APPEALS TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS OR
CIRCUIT COURT ON THAT ISSUE. SPECIFIC FINDINGS DIRECTED AT THE RELEVANT APPROVAL
CRITERIA ARE WHAT CONSTITUTE RELEVANT EVIDENCE.
AFTER THE 14-DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE
DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWI�ERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED
WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WftITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS
OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL
CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL
APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISIQN-MAKING PROCESS:
• e app icauon is accepte y t e Ciry
• Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day
written comment period.
• The application is reviewed bY City Staff and affected agencies.
• City Staff issues a written decision.
• Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of
record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any
City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is
entrtled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such
notice or an`�one who is otherwise entitled to such notice.
INFORIVIATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
e app ication, written comments an supporung ocuments relied upon by the Director to make this decision are
contained a ithin the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development
Department. If you a�anc to inspect the file, please call and make an appoincment with either the project planner or the planning
rechnicians. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service.
Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice
under the section titled "Your Ri�ht to Provide Written Comments."
- ----, _, ��--
y r 1 I �ii �tv>>� ;,i.>>�..
I
` ,�, D4LI'3��8 ����;
�2� ===a=����
REPTA
�>> PARTTTIc.�N
AKO $7 I
w
>
LE<:ENU:
°i SI�EIEC7
SITE
f ��
o -i
�RfF �C I.
NgvRG �
i ��
�� N
a^' MITA
A
LN
TLA� .._, ,,,,.a.
a
�N �ppm�ni a eete 1e i, .•<•.•�
REQUEST F4R COMMENTS ''
� � .
ll�1TE: ul�-3, ?00�
TO: PER ATTACHED
FROM: City of Ti�ard Plannin�Division
STAFF CONTACT:Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner (x2437)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 624-3681 Email: cherylc@ti�ard-or.�ov
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2008-00005
- REPTA PARTITION -
REQUES : e app icant is requesting approva to arution one 25,879-square oot 0.62-acre ot into two ots
of 15,477 square feet and 10,448 square }eet. The applicant proposes to retain the existin single-family home on
Lot 1 and build a new single-famiIy detached home on Lot 2. I'ro�posed Lot 2 will be a�a lot. LOCATION:
11400 SW 90`h Avenue; Washin�t on County Tax Map 1S135DA, Tax Lot 2900. ZONE: �-4.5: Low Densit
Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes wrt or wit out
accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied
by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report anci
recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish
to comment on this ap plication, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK-BY: JULY 17, 2008. You may use
the space provided beCow or attac a separate etter to return your coinments. ou are una6�res ond b the
above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments an con irm your comments in
wr�ting as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter or email.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name & Number of Person Commenting:
a, , �'TY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR "�MMENTS
NOTIFICA. LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DE �PMENT APPLICATIONS
FILE NOS.: � C l� Za�� � �`-�,�'S FILE NAME: � t�
CITY OfFICES
LONG RANGE PLANNING/ROn Bunch,Planning Mgr. �URRENT PLANNING/Todd Prager/Arborist-Planner POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Preven[ion Officer
�BUILDING DIVISION/Mark Vandomelen,Plans Ex.Supervisor NGINEERING DEPT.1Kim McMillan,Dvipmnt.Review Engineer _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets)
CITV ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder PLIBLIC WORKS/Brian Rager,Assistant Public Works Direclor PLANNING COMMISSIONIGRETCHEN(+12 sets)
COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT.lPlanning-Engineering Techs. PUBLIC WORKS/Steve Martin,Parks Supervisor �.E1LE/REFERENCE 4i�Aj' 'L S C�,�
_CODE ENFORCEMENT/Christine Damell,Code Compliance Specialist(DCA)
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
_ TUAL.HILLS PARK 8 REC.DIST.*�TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE 8 RESCUE ♦ �TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT�r �cLEAN WATER SERVICES�
Planning Manager r North Division Administrative Office aevelopment Services Department
15707 SW Walker Road John K.Dalby,Depu?y Fire Marshall PO Box 745 David Schweitzer/SWM Program
Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97075 2550 SW Hilisboro Highway
Beaverton,OR 97005-1152 Hillsboro,OR 97123
LOCAL ANO STATE IURISDICTIONS
CITY OF BEAVERTON � CITY OF TUALATIN � OR.DEPT.OF FISH 8 WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS
_ Planning Manager Planning Manager Devin Simmons,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood�w�uN Fo.m R.y�i,ea�
_ Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100
PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279
Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231
_ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM.
METRO-LAND USE 8 PLANNING� _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.8 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE
_ CITY OF DURHAM � 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,5uite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380
City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232
17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. Joanna Mensher,DalaResourceCenter�ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG.
Durham,OR 97224 _ Paulette Allen,Growm Management Cooramalor OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.B DVLP. Kathryn Harris�M.P.d cws�en.�o��y�
_ Mel Huie,GreenspacesCoorCinaror(CPMOA) M8f8 UII08(Canp PlanAmendmentsBMeasure37) Routing CENWP-OP-G
CITY OF KING CITY� _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,R��o„ai�a��a�twena�a5� 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946
City Manager _ C.D.Manager,c�o�nnnna��ama��s�wgs Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946
15300 SW 116th Avenue
King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY �
OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY�POweei�es��tveal OR.DEPT OF AVIATION�MonaPO�e rowan� Dept.of Land Use&Transp.
Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,P�a����9 155 N.First Avenue
_CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO�1► Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13
Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hilisboro.OR 97124
PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Naomi Vogel-eeattie�c�,��naPs
Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Planning Division�zcn�MSia
_ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 � Brent Curtis ccPn�
CITY OF PORTLAND (NOtHyla Wetiantls antl Potentiai Envimnmental impacts) Development Review Coordinator poria Mateja�zca�Ms�a
Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section�va���o�5� _Sr.Cartographer,cPazcAiMS,.
1900 SW 4`"Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Jim Nims,s�rve��,�ca,MS,s
Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037
OR.PARKS 8 REC.DEPT.
WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A� _OOOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC
Dave Austin�wccca�°9,r•�M�,�b.o,.«.i Sam Hunaidi,AssistaniDistr�ctManager (Noti/yIfODOTR/R-Hwy.CrossinpisOnlyAccasstoland) PRESERVATION OFFICE
PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,Sr Cmssing Safery Speciahs� (Notify it Vroperty Has H�Overlay)
Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13`"Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner Street NE,Suite C
Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301
UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAI AGENCIES 2e d.u�o � �Ic�m.
PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Bu.�ington Northem/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor)
Bruce Carswell,President 8 General Manager
1200 Howard Drive SE
Albany,OR 97322-3336
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS �COMCAST CABLE CORP. _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT.
Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer�n�„e.aro�so��Y� Gerald Backhaus,5��a�«�»a����a=o QfProjectisWi�hin'/.MlleotaTranseROUte)
5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner
Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street
Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232
�PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC �NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY �VERIZON �QWEST COMMUNICATIONS
Mike Hieb Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. John Cousineau,OSP Network Lynn Smith,Eng.ROW Mgr.
9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd. 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110
Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97219
TIGARDlTUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J _BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 }�COMCAST CABLE CORP. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC.
Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jennifer Garland,Demographics Alex Silantiev �S�Mao�dA�ea����o Brian Every�4o�EO����No��,
6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg.12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue
Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203
� INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANYfALL
CITY PROf ECTS (Project Planner I5 Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:�pattylmasters�Request For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED: 3-Apr-08)
(Also update:iicurpin\seWp\labels\annexationslannexation_utilities and franchises.doc,mailing labels 8 auto tex�when updating this docume�
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ''
� � .
DATE: ul 3, 2008
TO: Todd Pra�er, City of Ti�ard Arborist/Planner
FROM: City of Ti�ard Plannin�Division
STAFF CONTACT:Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner (x2437)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 FaX: (503) 624-3681 Email: cherylc�ti�ard-or.�ov
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2008-00005
- REPTA PARTITION -
REQUES : e app icant is requesting approva to Partition one 25,879-square oot 0.62-acre ot into two ots
of 15,477 square feet and 10,448 sguare teet. The applicant proposes to retain the existin single-family home on
Lot 1 and build a new single-family detached home on Lot 2. I'ro�posed Lot 2 will be a�ag lot. LOCATION:
11400 SW 90`h Avenue; Washin�t on County Tax Map 1S135DA, Tax Lot 2900. ZONE: R-4.5: Low Densit
Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes wit or wit out
accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied
by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and
recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish
to comment on this ap plication, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 17, 2008. You may use
the space provided below or attac a s� eparate etter to return your comments. ou are una e to res ond b the
above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments an con irm your comments in
writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
/ Please contact of our office.
✓ Please refer to the enclosed letter or email.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name&Number of Person Commenting:
MEMORANDUM
TO: Cheryl Caines
FROM: Todd Prager, City Arborist
RE: Repeta Partition
DATE: July 17, 2008
As you requested I have provided comments on the "Repeta Partition" project. If you
have any questions or concerns regarding my comments please contact me anytime.
18.370.020 Adiustments
C. Special adiustments.
6. Adjustments to landscaping requirements (Chapter 18.745).
a. Adjustment to use of existing trees as street trees. By means of a Type
I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, the Director shall
approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for the use of
existing trees to meet the street tree requirements in Section
18.745.030 providing there has been no cufting and filling around the
tree during construction which may lead to its loss, unless the
following can be demonstrated:
(1) The ground within the drip-line is altered merely for drainage
purposes; and
(2) It can be shown that the cut or fill will not damage the roots and will
not cause the tree to die.
b. Adjustment for street tree requirements. By means of a Type I
procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, the Director shall
approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for the
adjustmenfs to the street tree requirements in Section 18.745.030,
based on the following approval criteria:
(1) If the location of a proposed tree would cause potential problems
with existing utility lines;
(2) If the tree would cause visual clearance problems; or
(3) If there is not adequate space in which to plant street trees.
No street tree adjustments are being requested.
18.745.030 Genera/Provisions
C, lnstallation Requirements. The installation of all landscaping shall be as
follows:
1. A!1 landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting
procedures.
The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree
Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the
American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10th edition. In the
Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees
based on the soil volume and size at maturitv. Additionally, there are directions for soil
amendments and modifications.
2. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meef the size and
grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock
(ANSI Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions); and
3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of
this title.
D. Certificate of Occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless
the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have
been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond.
18.745.040, Street Trees
B. Street tree p/antin_q list. Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets
and sidewalks or can cause persona! injury. Approval of any planting list shall
be subject to review by the Director.
This requirement has not been met. There appears to be room for 3 large stature trees
to the north of the driveway, and 1 large stature tree to the south of driveway. Please
have applicant propose street tree species and locations in the plan set that meet the
requirements of TDC section 18.745.040.
It is acceptable for them to include a note on their street tree plan that slight variations in
placement may be required due to driveways, utilities, etc., but every attempt will be
made to keep the same net number of street trees that are shown on the plans.
18.745.050, Bufferin_q and Screenin_q
This requirement has not been met.
The applicant is proposing to retain the existing arborvitae hedge to the north of the
driveway in order to meet the buffer requirement, but they have not proposed a
protection method for it. I recommend they protect the existing hedge with 6' orange
plastic construction fencing at a minimum. Please have the applicant show protection
specifications for the hedge in their plan set.
18.790.030, Tree Plan Requirement
A. Tree plan repuired. A tree plan for the planting, remova!and protection of
trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or
combination of/ots or parcels for which a development application for a
subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or
conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over remova/ wherever
possible.
As required, the applicant has provided a tree plan conducted by Peter Torres, a
certified arborist. However, the tree plan does not contain all of the required elements
(see B4 below).
B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following:
1. Identification of the location, size and species of al!existing trees
including trees designated as significant by the city;
This requirement has been met.
2. ldentification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree
remova/over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the
replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the
following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other
development code provisions for Iandscaping, streets and parking lots:
a. Retention of/ess than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper
requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section
18.790.060D of no net/oss of trees;
b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in
caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be
mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D;
c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 92 inches in
caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be
mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D;
d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper
requires no mifigation.
This requirement has been met.
Over 75% of the viable, non-fruit trees over 12" in diameter will be retained. Therefore,
no mitigation is required.
3. ldentification of all trees which are proposed to be removed;
This requirement has been met.
4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used
by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction.
This requirement has not been met.
The fencing and tree protection specifications in the arborist report need be transferred
accurately to the site plans.
The fencing type (6' high metal) and tree protection specifications in the arborist report
need be transferred accurately to the site plans (to scale) and include a signature of
approval from the project arborist.
The tree protection plan needs to address tree protection standards and methods for
after construction. Specifically, they need to address acceptable landscaping practices
and materials around preserved trees. This additional information can be provided on
the site plans as well.
18.790.040 /ncentives for Tree Retention
B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in
accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the
reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as
a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to
removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall
record a deed restriction as a condition of approva!of any development
permit affected by this section to the efiect that such tree may be removed
only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The
deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree
preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed
as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to
approval by the Director.
A condition of approval will ensure that this standard is met.
18.790.050 Permit Applicability
A. Remova!permit required. Tree removal permits shal!be required only for
the removal of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as
defined by Chapter 18.775. The permit for removal of a tree shall be
processed as a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using
the following approval criteria:
1. Remova!of the tree must not have a measurable negative impact on
erosion, soil stabilify, f/ow of surface waters or water quality as evidenced
by an erosion control plan which precludes:
a. Deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or similar materia!exceeding ?/2 cubic
foot in vo/ume on public or private streefs, adjacent property, or into the
storm and surface water system, either by direct deposit, dropping,
discharge or as a result of the action of erosion;
b. Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soi/s; turbid or
sediment-laden flows; or evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on
bare soil s/opes where the flow of water is not filtered or captured on site
using the techniques of Chapter 5 of the Washington County Unified
Sewerage Agency Environmental Protection and Erosion Control rules.
2. Within stream or wetland corridors, as defined as 50 feet from the
boundary of fhe stream or wetland, tree remova!must maintain no less
than a 75% canopy cover or no /ess than the existing canopy cover if the
existing canopy cover is /ess than 75%.
B. Effective date of permit A tree remova/permit shall be effective for one and
one-ha/f years from the date of approval.
C. Extension. Upon written request by the applicant prior to the expiration of
the existing permit, a tree removal permit shall be extended for a period of
up to one year if the Director finds that the applicant is in compliance with
all prior conditions of permit approval and that no material facts stated in
the original application have changed.
D. Removal permit not required. A tree removal permit shall not be required
for the removal of a tree which:
1. Obstructs visual clearance as defined in Chapter 18.795 of the title;
2. Is a hazardous tree;
3. /s a nuisance affecting public safety as defined in Chapter 7.40 of the
Municipal Code;
4. Is used for Christmas iree production, or land registered wifh the
Washington County Assessor's office as tax-deferred tree farm or smaJl
woodlands, but does not stand on sensitive lands.
E. Prohibition of commercial forestry. Commercia!forestry as defined by
Section 18.790.020 A.2., excluding D.4. above, is not permitted.
This requirement is not applicable to this project.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Street Trees
This requirement has not been met. There appears to be room for 3 large stature trees
to the north of the driveway, and 1 large stature tree to the south of driveway. Please
have applicant propose street tree species and locations in the plan set that meet the
requirements of TDC section 18.745.040.
It is acceptable for them to include a note on their street tree plan that slight variations in
placement may be required due to driveways, utilities, etc., but every attempt will be
made to keep the same net number of street trees that are shown on the plans.
Tree Mitigation
This requirement has been met.
Over 75% of the viable, non-fruit trees over 12" in diameter will be retained. Therefore,
no mitigation is required.
Buffering and Screening
This requirement has not been met.
The applicant is proposing to retain the existing arborvitae hedge to the north of the
driveway in order to meet the bufFer requirement, but they have not proposed a
protection method for it. I recommend they protect the existing hedge with 6' orange
plastic construction fencing at a minimum. Please have the applicant show protection
specifications for the hedge in their plan set.
Tree Protection
This requirement has not been met.
The fencing and tree protection specifications in the arborist report need be transferred
accurately to the site plans.
The fencing type (6' high metal) and tree protection specifications in the arborist report
need be transferred accurately to the site plans (to scale) and include a signature of
approval from the project arborist.
The tree protection plan needs to address tree protection standards and methods for
after construction. Specifically, they need to address acceptable landscaping practices
and materials around preserved trees. This additional information can be provided on
the site plans as well.
The applicant shall position fencing as directed by the project arborist in his report dated
May 5, 2008 to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall allow access by the
City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify
that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan,
or maintain tree protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for
immediate suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil
citations can be processed.
If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall
prepare a proposal detailing the construction techniques to be employed and the likely
impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist
before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone. The City Arborist may
require changes prior to approval. The project arborist shall be on site while work is
occurring within the tree protection zone and submit a summary report certifying that the
work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly impact the health and/or
stability of the trees. This note shall be included on the Tree Protection Plan.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings
indicating the locations of trees that were preserved on the lot during site
development. In addition, the plans shall include accurate locations of tree
canopy driplines and protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the
project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be
employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be
installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall
remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,
until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. Prior to final inspection for
each lot, the applicant shall submit a final report by the Project Arborist certifying
the health of protected trees and that the street trees were properly planted per
the approved street tree plan. Tree protection measures may be removed and
final inspection authorized upon review and approval by the City Arborist.
The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist
has submitted written reports to the City Arborist, at least once every two weeks, as the
Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone
(TPZ) fencing installation through the building construction phases. The repo�ts shall
evaluate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing, determine if any
changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been
violated. If the amount of TPZ was reduced, then the Project Arborist shall certify that
the construction activities did not adversely impact the overall, long-term health and
stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted to the City Arborist at the
scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not
being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the City can stop work on the
project until an inspection can be done by the City Arborist and the Project Arborist.
Prior to final inspection for each lot, the applicant shall submit a final report by the
Project Arborist certifying the health of protected trees and that the street trees were
properly planted per the approved street tree plan. Tree protection measures may be
removed and final inspection authorized upon review and approval by the City Arborist.
Deed Restriction
Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the applicant/owner shall record
deed restrictions to the effect that any existing tree greater than 6" diameter may be
removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed
restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in
accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree.
l
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ''
� � .
DATE: July3, 2008
TO: Mark Vandomelen, City of Ti�ard Plans Examiner Supervisor
FROM: City of Ti�ard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT:Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner (x2437)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 624-3681 Email: cherylc�ti�ard-or.�ov
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2008-00005
- REPTA PARTITION -
REQUES : e app icant is requestin approva to Partiuon one 25,879-square oot 0.62-acre ot into two ots
of 15,477 square feet and 10,448 square�eet. The applicant proposes to retain the existing�single-family home on
Lot 1 and build a new si_n_�gle-famiIy detached home on Lot 2. I'ro�posed Lot 2 will be a flag Iot. LOCATION:
11400 SW 90`h Avenue; Washin�t on County Tax Map 1S135DA, Tax Lot 2900. ZONE: R-4.5: Low Densit
Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes wit or wit out
accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied
by various departments and a encies and from other information available to our staff, a report and
recommendation will be prepare�and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish
to comment on this ap plicauon, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK-BY: jULY 17, 2008. You may use
the space provided below or attac a separate etter to return your comments. ou are una e to res ond b the
above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments an con irm your comments in
writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter or email.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name &Number of Person Commenting: -^ � ✓� ,� �S
�� �
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
DATE: 8/5/08
TO: Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner
FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer�����
RE: MLP2008-00005 Repta
Access Manaqement (Section 18.705.030.H)
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with
all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and
streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and
deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and
AASHTO.
The applicant's engineer has indicated on the plans that the sight distance from
the existing driveway on SW 90th Avenue is 283 feet to the north and 500 feet to
the south. SW 90th Avenue is classified as a local street with a maximum speed
of 25 mph, which requires a minimum sight distance of 250 feet. This criterion is
met. The proposed driveway for the new lot will enter the cul-de-sac bulb of SW
Lomita Avenue. At the entry into the cul-de-sac the vehicle will not have on-
coming traffic at significant speed to content with. Any traffic will be from other
driveways or vehicles turning around and the travel speed will be minimal,
therefore vehicles exiting the subject property will have adequate sight distance
and response time to enter the cul-de-sac safely.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be
placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections.
Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic
commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway
setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet,
measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat
of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the
influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact
report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a
project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore
any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is
not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the
intersection as possible.
This property is not located on a collector or arterial street; therefore the standard
does not apply.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 1
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways
and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of
driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum
spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
The property is not located on a collector or arterial and is not constructing a
local street; therefore this standard does not apply.
Street And Utilitv Improvements Standards (Section 18.8101:
Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of
public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and
drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets
adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width
planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved
in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a
local street to have a 54 foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section.
Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and
bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street
trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW 90th Avenue, which is classified as a local street on
the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25
feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map.
The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from
centerline.
SW 90th Avenue is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact
from this development, the applicant should plant street trees and enter into a
future streets improvement agreement for the remaining improvements.
This site lies adjacent to SW Lomita Avenue, which is classified as a local street
on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately
40 feet of ROW radius from centerline, according to the most recent tax
assessor's map. The standard requires the minimum curb radius within the bulb
ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 2
to be 40 feet. With the additional 11 feet for the curb, sidewalk and planter strip
the required ROW from centerline shall be a 51 foot radius. The applicant should
dedicate the additional ROW to provide 51 feet from centerline.
SW Lomita Avenue is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact
from this development, the applicant should plant street trees and enter into a
future streets improvement agreement for the remaining improvements.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states
that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and
proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division.
This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a
satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the
boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be
constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining
properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to
continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is
developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the
property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City
Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost.
Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be
constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length.
The property is bounded on two sides by local streets and on the other two sides by
existing residential development. There are no opportunities or needs for future
streets or extensions of streets through this property.
Street Alignment and Connections:
Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of
no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where
prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing
developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other
restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street
connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a
regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction.
Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and
collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within
the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by
environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns
or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or
extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure
the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered
topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance
of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical
ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 3
constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that
a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the
constraint precludes some reasonable street connection.
The property is bounded on two sides by local streets and on the other finro sides by
existing residential development. There are no opportunities or needs for future
streets or extensions of streets through this property.
Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.L states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200
feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall
only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing
development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code
preclude street extension and through circulation:
• All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround
configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer;
and
• The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured from the centerline
intersection point of the two streets to the radius point of the bulb, and
• If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an
adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the
City.
The applicant's narrative indicates that the cul-de-sac is over 200 feet long (it is
over 800 feet long) and will provide access to over 20 dwelling units. This does
not meet the standard. The length of the cul-de-sac is already established and
will not be changed. However, the addition of dwelling units in excess of 20 does
not have to be approved when it does not meet the code. The applicant has
applied for an adjustment to this standard in accordance with 18.370.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape
of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building
sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient
access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of
limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks
formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-
way line except:
• Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or
other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or;
• For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major
collectors or railroads.
• For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides
equivalent access.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 4
PLANNING
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections
on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street
connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no
more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict
adherence to other standards in the code.
PLANNING
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being
more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5
times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
PLANNING
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of
frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land
partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a
minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access
easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling
unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
PLANNING
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to
meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial,
collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets
shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant shall enter into a future street improvement agreement for SW gptn
and SW Lomita Avenues, which will include public sidewalks, thereby meeting
this criterion.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be
installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to
existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and
Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as
adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future
revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive
plan.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 5
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems
shall include consideration of additional development within the area as
projected by the Comprehensive Plan.
There is a public sewer line located in SW 90th Avenue and a lateral that serves
the existing home. There is a public sewer line in SW Lomita Avenue that
terminates at a manhole. The applicant's plans show a lateral extension from the
manhole to serve the proposed parcel.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make
adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a
culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate
potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or
outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary
size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction
Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it
is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from
the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and
Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have
been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions
have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the
development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards
for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water
Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek
and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that
plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater
detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net
increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that
all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide
onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno
Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff
will be permitted to discharge without detention.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 6
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such
as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site
water quantity facility to accommodate detention of the storm water from
Parcel 2. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a
fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff
recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those
required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services
and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface
mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter
cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service
facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at
50,000 volts or above, and:
• The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving
utility to provide the underground services;
• The City reserves the right to approve location of all surtace mounted
facilities;
• All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains
installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the
surfacing of the streets; and
• Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing
the street improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states
that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the
development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities
which are not underground will serve the development and the approval
authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-
grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in
conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-
by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a
short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground
utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by
utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public
right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-
grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 90th Avenue. If
the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage
ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 7
that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 129.3 lineal feet;
therefore the fee would be $ 4525.50.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND
UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS:
Fire and Life Safetv:
The applicant has submitted a Fire Hydrant Flow Test Report, dated 4/22/2008,
provided by Tualatin Valley Water District. The report indicates that flow at 20
psi residual pressure (calculated) is 1086 gpm. The hydrant is located at the
northwest corner of the subject property within the SW 90th Avenue ROW. TVFR
requires a minimum of 1000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. This hydrant
provides adequate flow.
Public Water Svstem:
Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) provides service in this area. The
applicant must submit plans for review and approval to TVWD prior to issuance
of City of Tigard permits.
Storm Water Qualitv:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM)
regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and
Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which
require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100
percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious
surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the
frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained
through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such
as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site
water quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from
Parcel 2. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a
fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff
recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application.
Gradinq and Erosion Control:
CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to
reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public
ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 8
storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction,
grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates
erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an
erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City
permits.
An Erosion Control Plan must be submitted with the PFI Permit application for
review and approval.
Address Assiqnments:
The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the
City of Tigard. An addressing fee in the amount of$50.00 per address shall be
assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to final plat approval.
Survev Requirements
The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on
two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic
control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be
of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the
coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements
to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates
can be established by:
• GPS tie nefinrorked to the City's GPS survey.
• By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS nefinrork.
The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points
for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other
water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State
Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91).
Recommendations:
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to
cover utility laterals and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6)
sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to
the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any
drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets
ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 9
relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit
plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,
which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tiqard-or.qov).
. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address
and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be
designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance
for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a
corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which
the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact
person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering
Department will delay processing of project documents.
. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan
for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking
and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase.
. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee.
(STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart, Engineering).
. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall plant street trees along the
frontage of SW 90th Avenue and along the frontage of SW Lomita Avenue (if
there is space along the cul-de-sac bulb).
. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to
complete or participate in the future improvements of SW 90th and SW
Lomita Avenues adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following
events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or
paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or
paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency,
C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed
by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction
expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the
subject property, or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate
by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements
by others adjacent to the subject site.
. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for
the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility
Improvement permit.
. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility
Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the
ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 10
"Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning
Manual, February 2003 edition."
. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two
monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic
control network (GC 22) as recorded in Washington County survey records.
These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same
precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the
coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north.
These coordinates can be established by:
• GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
• By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared
by a land su►veyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or
narrative.
B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee
(Contact Planning/Engineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext.
2421).
C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum
standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05),
Washington County, and by the City of Tigard.
D. The right-of-way dedication for SW 90th Avenue, providing 27 feet
from centerline, and for SW Lomita Avenue, providing a 51 foot radius, shall
be made on the final plat.
E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat
until they receive notice from the Engineering Department indicating that the
City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's
surveyor.
F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit one
paper copy of the final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City
Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for
subdivisions).
ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 11
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the
Engineering Department with a paper copy of the recorded final plat.
. The City Engineer may determine the necessity for, and require submittal
and approval of, a construction access and parking plan for the home
building phase. If the City Engineer deems such a plan necessary, the
applicant shall provide the plan prior to issuance of building permits.
. Prior to issuance of building permits within the subdivision, the City Engineer
shall deem the public improvements substantially complete. Substantial
completion shall be when: 1) all utilities are installed and inspected for
compliance, including franchise utilities, 2) all local residential streets have at
least one lift of asphalt, 3) any off-site street and/or utility improvements are
substantially completed, and 4) all street lights are installed and ready to be
energized.
. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW
90th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee
in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the
site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the
fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 4525.50 and it shall be paid prior
to issuance of building permits.
. During issuance of the building permit for Parcel 2, the applicant shall pay
the standard water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts will
be the latest approved by CWS).
ENGINEERING COMMENTS PAGE 12
Cheryl Caines
Assciate Planner
I have a concern about the Partition (MLP) 2008-0005. If 90th Ave is zoned for Single-Family residents how does the
Repta's run what appears a Elderly Care Facility out of that address.
The address 11400 SW 90th Ave. may be registered as a single family home but it is not being used as a single family
home. There are caretakers coming and going all the time. TRI-Met buses stop and pick up elderly in front of the address
all the time.
What I don't want to see happen is the value of all the real single family home going down in value. Please check on the
zcrir:y ^f thsse properties. �
Ron Heitz
11401 SW 90th
Tigard, Or. 97223
�,—_ _.. . - .,. ,,..,
�. ,,
AUG 2 0 2008
C;�`,' �'=� TE��' �'�
�
„ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
' OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL
IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY
A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE.
In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for:
Land Use File Nos.: MLP2008-00005/VAR2008-00022
Land Use File Name: REPTA PARTITION- "REVISED NOTICE”
I, Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner for the Ci ,�gard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal
affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currendy
registered) 1 14-W 5 �J �10`�" A�v�-
and did personally post notice of the proposed land use application(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general
vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof,
on the 13�"' day of �c,�q u.�� 12008.
���P�-�- Q . C_.G�-tn-�2�.�
Signature o Person Who Performed Posting
h:\login\paay\mas[ers\afEidavit of posting for appGcant co post pubGc headng.doc
"REVISED NOTICE" - REPTA PARTITIOl�T
MINOR D PARTITON (MLP) 2008-00005 �
ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2008-00022
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting apprc�val to Partition one 25,879-square foot (0.62-
acre) lot into two lots of 15,477 square feet and 10,448 square feet. The applicant proposes to
retain the existing single-family home on Lot 1 and build a new single-family detached home �n
Lot 2. Proposed Lot 2 will be a flag lot. LOCATION: 11400 SW 90t'' r�venue; Washing��n
County Tax Map 1 S 135Dr�, Tax Lot 2900. ZONE: R-4.5: Low Density Residential. The R-4.5
zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without
accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also
permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development
Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790,
18.795 and 18.810. . An Adjustment has been requested to the Street Improvement Standards to
allow more than 20 units to access onto a cul-de-sac. This maximum is exceeded because tb •e
are currently 18 single-family units and approximately 39 multi-family units that have access onto
SW Lomita Avenue.
Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division �staff contact: Cher�l Caines,
Associate Planner (x2� at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171
or by email to ehervle o,tigard-or.gov. �, copy of the application and all documents and evidence
submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no
cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost.
- -- -
- �y r ��'I�y ��� � � � ; . • '
- (I1 i� . GE�GRAPHiC INFOHMAI'('.�i `..'�'�11M
�fY —, �--� ���. ..,,;��, ���,, AREA N�TIFIED ��
I I. i tiliNMi��! �� .
-�� �». �,nu�.N� (5�0') ��
ST
� , - - -
� ! au�ana� '
m�en�nM I sawur�: �
m�sm�u� �m�emxN --- i _ �
- r
tsmmm� �mosnrnu m�wunn �� �
_________________
LI I m�suoto� „
----- � -----------------
> °""""" � """""" ' �— --- FO R: Doug Cam pbe l l
L AIf6M1I6M 1tWp/1SH I 1fIiSYM7��
75W7
�'����~ RE: 1 S135DA 2900
, _ �
i - m�.N„MU m�..n,�� m.s..�:.�
s
mos�aw� � � m�erw� m�srmw �
�-- p� uas�nnm�wnnu�xnn� m�e�mx�� ' j �� _________________I
__ ,� mosN�m� _ _ - -- — -- — � mnrusu
ua�su
� � 1{17Sq�i�M ��_.—.—.— I
�-- __. _ �xON��l�N�1iq6M�tN� - ' . .
~ m.w.nN Property owner information
m�snna� m�sunm �uw�ua
m
eusa�m� ��um�w � �„������t ����u1 u is valid for 3 months from
_ --- - ---- �eenn�mmntu.l — ---- , .
_ i __1 ���u��� �� the date printed on this map.
- I 750�179 R170MQ601I
1SIOS1�17180 7l�11P�� 1E1f6N16i�0
) -- aaum� — ��f Y.�
r rsu w o�--� � _ mascouwa1 m�sou�ns iansunaa
-,
m�outa� � m�annan I I m�eeees�o� —� m�snurw �nosa�waa -- i
� i mnnr f- -- �isna�oa�al — �
�- � (
�J ma�uwn
^ I I 1fUfN1iN� /` �1fOf�D7�1f
I'V �NNMi�N I 1fAi11�N�1 I 1t17iNYi{.(.� - ' --- . -. �
�tI7NM� - `��
� '_.� . L I —_ �� - _ .1f1i��Nii17 I � � -_ �
r 1i17f1�Q���
� � I ii�t0i ��� __
'� � �- { M�BCOt � � itl7/NO{II �� I .
� rn �,��..���. D
� �O , . ---; r
` ��,n..�.r '
r
I � I LOMITA �__- -
��/ m�enma { uasuu�n i
� I li L - — i i I i
I ' �,
; 1
i ♦
TAN�ELA , I� ', N
LN �` ' - �� �' �z, '
� -- �0 7�V 0 100 200 300 400 Feet
/�"J�
-` [i
� � .__. . ' � 1..=294 feet
�� ��� �� - ��i '��, ,�
Q- �� I
_
� _
� � �
(n -- ___ Information is map is for general location only and
♦— should be venf with Ne Devalopmanl Services Division.
� � I—�� � 1 125 SW Hall 81vd
�Q / Tiga ,OR 97223
. 1 � � � (� ���� � � (503 839-4171
_ � � � .'Z � �I http II _ci_tigard or.us �
Community Development Plot date: g 7,2008; :Unagic\MAGIC03.APR
, �
1S135D D-03300 1S135DA-01500
1616 SHORELINE LLC& BECKAL LLC
LOMITA WEST LP 7100 SW GABLE PKWY
BY AFFINITY PROPERTY MGMT PORTLAND,OR 97225
421 SW 6TH AVE STE#905
PORTLAND, OR 97204
1S135DA-05100 1 135DA-01600
2000-014 PARTITION PLAT BE L C
OWNERS OF LOTS 2-3 7100 GABLE PKWY
2993 N CANYON RD P TLAN ,OR 97225
PROVO, UT 84604
1 135D6-1310 1 135DA-0170
20 -07 ARTITION PLAT BE L C
OW OF LOTS 2-3 710 GABLE PKWY
RTLAN ,OR 97225
1 S 135 D B-13000 1 35 DA-0350
ANTHONY DENETTEL BE L C
11483 SW 90TH AVE 7100 GABLE PKWY
TIGARD, OR 97223 P TLAN ,OR 97225
1S135DD-03606 1S135DC-07200
APPLETON REYNOLD G& BELL CARROLL M
MARLER LINDA L 11600 SW 91ST AVE
7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135D6-12200 1S135DD-03604
ARCE JUAN P&ROSA M BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A
11369 SW 91 ST CT 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02802 1S135DA-01400
ARCHER CANDACE BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM
11300 SW 90TH AVE 11515 SW HALL BLVD
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-05000 1 5DA-03503
AVITIA ARMONDO L 8� BRA P ANANDA ASHRAMA
MARRON LILIA 1151 LL BLVD
8950 SW NORTH DAKOTA TI ARD,OR 7223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DB-12800 1 S135D8-00600
BAXTER JENNIFER S BREWER SCOTT R
11475 SW 90TH AVE 11545 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-11500 1S135DD-03603
BECK NATHAN A&DAWNA R BROWN TRENT D&ALISON M
11315 SW 91 ST CT 11425 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02701 7S135DD-O5500
BROYLES JENNIE A GAFFNEY BRIAN
11260 SW 90TH 11540 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D6-10800 1 S135DA-02702
CHONG BENTON L GATES NATHAN M&KATIE L
11250 SW 915T CT 11230 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135DD-03609 1 S135D8-12100
DALE VIRGINIA E& GETZ VIRGINIA M
MACKINNON DANIEL W 13842 DAVANA TER
11625 SW LOMITA AVE SHERMAN OAKS,CA 91423
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DD-05400 1S135DB-00300
DOLL THOMAS C AND DORIS M GHITA VASILE&DOMNICA
11500 SW 90TH 11325 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-03000 1S135DB-02900
EATON LINDA L 8 RICHARD B HAMPTON KENNETH B&
9625 SW LEWIS LN KNOLL LAURA D
TIGARD, OR 97223 11515 SW 91STAVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02803 1S135DB-02604
ELLIS DANIEL 8 HEITZ NANCY P AND RONALD L
ARACO-ELLIS PATRICIA 11401 SW 90TH
11290 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-04000 1S135DD-03612
ERVIN ROBERT 8 KIM HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B
11360 SW 92ND AVE FLORENCE L
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 54
GARIBALDI,OR 97118
1 S 135 DC-08100 1 S 135 DD-03608
FERRIER GERALD L 8 JOYCE H HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B 8�FLORENCE
11565 SW 90TH AVE c/o HERBERHOLZ LARRY
TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 307
BANKS,OR 97106
1 S 135DC-07900 1 S135DD-03618
FISHER JAYME K& HOGAN VERDEEN
DAVID THEREASA R 11380 SW LOMITA AVE
8400 SW CEDARCREST ST PORTLAND,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135DB-02603 1S135DD-03805
FREESTONE JAEWARD HUGHES JEFFREY M 8 TAMI JO BARE
11403 SW 90TH AVE 11485 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D8-03900 15135D6-01900
JOHNSON CHARLEY F AND MATTHEWS MICHELE L
D.J. STRAUSBAUGH 11440 SW 91ST AVE
11390 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-11600 1S135DD-03611
JUDD ESTHER A&GEOFFREY A MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R&K YVONNE
11301 SW 91 ST CT 5400 SW 198TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007
1S135DA-01401 1S135DA-02601
KC PROPCO HOLDING I LLC MCTAGGART BRENT
BY KNOWLEDGE LEARNING CORP PO BOX 231207
ATTN:TAX DEPT TIGARD,OR 97281
650 NE HOLLADAY ST#1400
PORTLAND, OR 97232
1S135DA-04800 1S135D8-11700
LAURENCE RAYMOND S&CARRIE A MEZENTSEV ALEKSANDR M 8
8970 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST OTROKHOVA MIRA M
TIGARD,OR 97223 11285 SW 91 ST CT
PORTLAND,OR 97223
15135DD-03615 1 S135D8-02602
LAWHEAD JESSE A&JENNIFER L MILLER MAX 8�CHERYL
11470 5W LOMITA AVE 11435 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-00200 1S135DC-08200
LOFTUS LAURA 8� MOLITOR LAWRENCE R/NANCY L
WI�HELM CLARE 11587 SW 90TH AVE
11275 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135 DD-03617 1 S 135DD-03614
LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN NEBERT SUSAN ETTA 8 TOMMY HENRY
11410 SW LOMITA AVE 11530 SW LOMITA
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D6-11200 1 S135DD-03813
MAHON SUSAN M NEBERT TOMMY HENRY
11310 SW 91 ST CT SUSAN E
TIGARD,OR 97223 11530 SW LOMITA
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-04400 1S135DB-01800
MANSFIELD RYAN W& O'CALLAGHAN COLLEEN C
MANSFIELD VANESSA L 17702 OVERLOOK CIR
9055 SW N DAKOTA ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
TIGARD, OR 97223
1 S 135D6-10900 1 S135DD-03600
MARSHALL SHEILA K OLSEN ERIK&
11266 SW 91ST CT WINFIELD HILARY
TIGARD, OR 97223 11600 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135 D D-03619 1 S 135D B-02800
OVIST DAVID SANDBO JOHN R AND DONNA M
17460 WREN CT TRAUBA DONNA M
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 11475 SW 91ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02602 1S135D6-00100
PALACIOS DIONICIO MELCHOR& SCHAFFER HARRY E&
RAMIREZ MARICELA MELCHOR LILLIAN E TRS
9025 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11245 SW 90TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D6-11000 1 S135D8-11800
PALLAS DIANE E SCHENDEL WILLIAM M JR
11280 SW 91 ST CT 11277 SW 91 ST AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-11100 1S135DA-04900
PETERSON MICHAEL B& SHOOK TERRY&PAIGE
LOUIE TINA L 8960 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
11292 SW 91ST CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DB-02600 1 S135DB-02700
POWLOSKI C KENT&LISA SIMONSEN RORY L&
11405 SW 90TH ADAMS CINDY L
TIGARD, OR 97223 11435 SW 91ST AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-04200 1S135DD-05300
RADUT EMILIAN C&ADINA E SNYDER WILLIAM T&STEPHANIE
11310 SW 90TH AVE 11480 SW 90TH
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DB-01600 1 S135DB-12300
RAMIREZ JOSE C/MARIA TARHUNI JAMAL
11560 SW 91 ST 11347 SW 91 ST CT
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DA-02900 1 S135DD-03607
REPTA VASILE&LIDIA TASKAEVA SVETLANA
11400 SW 90TH AVE 11545 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-04300 1S135DB-11300
REPTA VASILE&LIDIA TENLY PROPERTIES CORP
11330 SW 90TH AVE 1055 NE 25TH AVE STE#A
TIGARD, OR 97223 HILLSBORO,OR 97124
1 S135DD-03620 35DB-11400'
ROGERS ALAN D TEN PERTIES CORP
11620 SW LOMITA AVE 105 E 2 AVE STE#A
TIGARD, OR 97223 LLSBORO,O 97124
1S135D D-03676
THOMPSON DAMIEN&
TAMEZ-THOMP50N TAMERA
11440 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D6-03800
VIAENE STEPHANIE L&KEVIN
11420 SW 92ND AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135D8-12000
VICE ALICIA K&RICHARD A
11375 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-03000
VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE
11405-11407 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1 S135D8-00500
WHITE BARBARA A
11495 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1 S135D8-01700
WHITMAN KATHLEEN R
11520 SW 91 ST AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DA-04000
WINDSOR PROPERTIES LTD
2245 NE CORNELL RD
HILLSBORO,OR 97124
1 S135DD-03602
WORSECH HAROLD A
SANDRA K
11450 SW 90TH
TIGARD,OR 97223
15135DB-12900
ZUMWALT LINDA L
11491 SW 90TH AVE
PORTLAND, OR 97223
Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design ��oup
PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren
Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120
Tigard, OR 97223
Sue Rorman Susan Beilke
11250 SW 82�d Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Naomi Gallucci Dayle D. & Evelyn 0. Beach
11285 SW 78th Avenue 11530 SW 72nd Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Diane Baldwin
3706 Kinsale Lane SE
Olympia, WA 98501
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136�h Place
Tigard, OR 97224
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 4B
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
CPO 4M
Pat Whiting
8122 SW Spruce
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY Of TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES �i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 6-Aug-07
AUG.06.2008 16:10 #0892 P.D01 /001
��� aF T1��
PLA�1NG DIDTISION PMENT DEPARTMF:NT
�.�a
13125 SW HAL.I, �3UULEVAR.D �w��""�
1'IGARI7,ORECON 97223 r"' ,
PIIONL: 5Q3-639�1171 FAX� iO3-624,36R1 (tlttn: Patty/PL�nnui� EMAIL: ir,}CtvCr�7t:b,ud-<�r.•��v � �;.�
_.. . de��
REQLI�ST FUR 500-FQOT PROPERTY OWNER M1�ILING LiS'T
Property nwner inforrnation is valid for 3 months�rom the date of yo�r reque:s-�
INT�TCATF.ALL PItC7JL"C'T M11P&TAX LOT i�UM[iFRS (i.e. 1 S134AB, '1'ax Lot 00�00) QR THE
ADI�RESSFS Ft)R ALL I'RC�JECl'P1IRCELS BELOW: '
(If mue-�;than 1 tax lot or if the parcel h�o aciciress,you must serarately identify each t��uc lot associated with the pruject.}
500 .. //yA� 5 GJ �'O �!/2titl�
_...._ �s ! 3 � �d2.�jal3 .__
PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONI.Y 1 SF.T QF LAIiELS WILL_BE PROVIDED AT THTS TIME FOR
HOLDING YQLTR NEIGI-iSORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land;use �pplic;acion to tl�c City,
and the pr�jec.t planncr has reviewed your application for completeness, you will be notified lry ineat�s �f an
incompleteness Iert�r t�obtain your 2 fiiz�l sets of lal�els. IF YOU l iAV�,BE,EN NOTIFIED BY PLANNING
'1'C�C�BTAIN YOUR LAIiELS, PLEASE 1NDICATE BELOW THAT YOU 1VC�D 2 SF,TS OF I.ABELS.
�Completeiiess Letter Received IndicaLin�Sets of Enve o s w/ ffixed Adciress L.abels Required
S � ?
T1�e 2 final sets �>f 1:�beL�need to be placed on e�e1o�(o self-adhesive e�s please). i#h first class letter-
rate }��t�;g� nn the envelopes u�t�tc fortn of pos[��e 5tamps (no metered envetopes and ��o return address) and
resui�mitt.ed to the C:iry fc�r the�urpasc of providing notice to prc�perty owners of thc proposed lu,c�use ap�licatic>n
�ind the de.cision. '11�e 2 se�s o envclopes must be ke t sepa►�t.e. 11�e person listcd below will be called to pick up
and p�3y for the lahels when they are re:�dy. ., �.�.��M,rs �- ge�` ,
N11M!? OF CONTAC.T PF.RS�N: �ssr ._ �-`�-- PHQNF.: �-t,4'�)-�19 -�/�1y''�.._
NANIE C)P C.'UMP11I�'Y:.._C.��/I FAX: (5��)-29�- 'S5��7
E_�1/IAIL:�frr�4 fJc�D�SQ rri,%��s.��+w+
�,
Tl�is request n�.ry be emailea, iuc�ile��, faxed, or hand delivered to the C;ity ol�'1'a��r�. Pl�ase allcrw a 2-d:ty min�ml�
for prcx;essing rec�uesl,s. Upon com�pletion af yc>ur requesL, t�1e �ontact person-lltirted v�ill br- called t,o ptck u���hcsr
request t��at will be�laced in "Will C;all" by the coul��,ny n�une (or lry the cc�mae�c perso�'s last n�une if n� company)
�t tl�e P1:uuzixlg/En�ncczing Counter at the Pennit Czn�er.
The c.c��rt of processing your request.ml��t be ��aid at the time of pic:k up,as�.xact.cost can n�t be pre-detennined.
YT.F:.�SI:' NOTE: FOR REA50N.S OF AC;CIIRACY, ONLY �RIGlNAI. MAILIN(� LABELS PR4VIDED ,8Y
THE CI?"Y US.R�-TYPFT�MlIII.ING LABLL,S WILL I3E ACCF.PTED.
C'��h�c DeSCription: '
$11 to�enerate the x��aiiing list,plus$2 per sheet for prunu�g the liSY.orito l�ibels(20 adc{resses per sheex). '.1.'hci�,multiplythe cost to
pruit one set o£label�by d�e nr�her of sets requested.
_ , . �,
, ��,, � , , a
,, P� ,�,I,��t� �;,���,� - „ ;,�C3ST-F�Q�.-._ �'�;���i.E �:T�.�'�'�,.�� „
i,'i�11 f�� t, �. F d;�,iimrd;.b �
`� SI1flSS�1{I1I'1CI5 X J�Z�:i�l@CL ' •,•1 ..... • 1., . , . . . . 1 .� _..
� �
. -, �.�OC?[2 scxs= $16.0� � sheer(�)nf labe:ls x SZ/sh,e�t a�s�� �cts- � .
..J shr.r.r��f l�rls z$Z/sheet for interestcd���x 2 seis- $ 4.00 Zshccr(�)of lal,eLs x$2/sheet for intcicsccd pa�t�r_s•-�c/s��s�
C�E.N EkATE LIST =__ �11.a0 _ ' GINERATE LIST = ,-_
.. - TQ`I'nI. - S31_60 '' 'IY>'I'.AI. Q�Q�
�
/
-- '�y • • ' ,
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SvSTEM
_ -- �7� AREA NOTIFIED
1517501Ut6�T
— 15GM1B�--- 15175MWl00 (�00,/
T
� ia�asono�e� — — —
15/75B�IQIIB 151750CBT7B7 1317 100
ui��ome�o is��sonosoa »swwe
— 0° FOR: Doug Campbell
mosonma �a��sonmao �mseaozmi usuoso �
- ,��soBaoYOO ��5��„ ° RE: 1 S135DA, 2900
U - � uusomeoa uvsennoa —
>
L m�semseo u�twm:ea �nasonaaoo � _______________
- a��suo:e
is�osoeaeoeo
in�senwea 151]SOB1710B 15175011078U1
isusoeoeoea masunwma
— — - msswaxee:
isioe�n:oa �sonne imosonaaao —
iavsonnaa
nio5waosao
— —— ia�ose�ao9ea mawnme
mosnas�w � usanau
mos000seo� ��soeoseoa'
m�se„��oo xi„fe�o,m aB1°' � Property owner information
masoeo:roo nvso�meo� inoso�o�sa� i5 valid f0►3 month5 from
a�uonwa mase�e:ne: �s��s�oaux ��SOY07iW
' ia��sooa�ne tai�sumeee the date printed on this map.
- i ason�o m�sooaua
m�so�aseoa �son�ee m�seoas�oa
�soema f
� ia��ee IU 1517510B7M5 1E175M0150B
ia�osooe�eas �/ —
is�osoeasaao �' ��so�owea
maseee:9ea mosaea�s�o is��euooew 1
�soemA TI
uioseowwe
� 13175011UH01
G 151i50Y05600 iS1150107i17
os�ewae m000eea�oo �s�ogoee�ao -- —- — �
�suu�ee
r—
— ia��seuooen uiose �n: .,.� I �
mos000aeae � � I
a�asocoe:o �socono =
-- ubocona uso�eacn �.
18175D0078E0 �E175B�B�BB9 D
(1.�O — i —� -- ---- 1i1i51GNitll r
� r
°� ,�,�sa�o�oo LOMIT — ,r,sooa»�o
♦
� ELA ,_- N
LN — G °� �
� J� 0 100 200 300 400 Feet
_ _
w .—. w � �� 1"=294 feet
Q / ' .._,, �d
a
.
.�
F— �'
T (n - Information on ihis map is for general location only and
� Z should be verified with the Development Services Division.
�I � —� � 13125 SW Hall Blvd
� Tigard,OR 97223
� � ZI. — n�_(�1^ (503)63&4171
�V http:l/www.ci.tigard.or.us
Community Development Plot date:Jun 11,2008;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR
15135D�'-03300 ' 1S135DA-01500
1616 SHORELINE LLC& BECKAL LLC
LOMITA WEST LP 7100 SW GABLE PKWY
BY AFFINITY PROPERTY MGMT PORTLAND,OR 97225
421 SW 6TH AVE STE#905
PORTLAND, OR 97204
1 S135DA-05100 135DA-01600
2000-014 PARTITION PLAT B L
OWNERS OF LOTS 2-3 7100 GABLE PKWY
2993 N CANYON RD TLAN , R 97225
PROVO, UT 84604
135D8-13100 135DA-01700
20 -073 RTITION PLAT BE L
OW OF LOTS 2-3 710 GABLE PKWY
RTLA OR 97225
1S135DB-13000 135DA-03500
ANTHONY DENETTE L BE L
11483 SW 90TH AVE 7100 GABLE PKWY
TIGARD,OR 97223 TLAN , R 97225
1S135DD-03606 1S135DC-07200
APPLETON REYNOLD G& BELL CARROLL M
MARLER LINDA L 11600 SW 91 ST AVE
7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-12200 1S135DD-03604
ARCE JUAN P&ROSA M BERGER CLIFFORD W 8 CYNTHIA A
11369 SW 91 ST CT 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02802 1S135DA-D1400
ARCHER CANDACE BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM
11300 SW 90TH AVE 11515 SW HALL 6LVD
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-O5000 1S135DA-03503
AVITIA ARMONDO L& BRAHMAPREMANANDA ASHRAMA
MARRON LILIA 11515 SW HALL BLVD
8950 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135D8-12800 1S135D8-00600
BAXTER JENNIFER S BREWER SCOTT R
11475 SW 90TH AVE 11545 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-11500 1S135DD•03603
BECK NATHAN A 8 DAWNA R BROWN TRENT D&ALISON M
11315 SW 91 ST CT 11425 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02701 ' 1S135DD-05500
BROYLES JENNIE A GAFFNEY BRIAN
11260 SW 90TH 11540 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-10800 1S?35DA-02702
CHONG BENTON L GATE�NATHAN M&KATIE L
11250 SW 91 ST CT 11230 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DD-03609 1 S135DB-12100
DALE VIRGINIA E& GETZ VIRGINIA M
MACKINNON DANIEL W 13842 DAVANA TER
11625 SW LOMITA AVE SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91423
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135 D D-05400 1 S 135 D B-00300
DOLL THOMAS C AND DORIS M GHITA VASILE&DOMNICA
11500 SW 90TH 11325 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DB-03000 1 S135D6-02900
EATON LINDA L 8�RICHARD B HAMPTON KENNETH B&
9625 SW LEWIS LN KNOLL LAURA D
TIGARD, OR 97223 11515 SW 91STAVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135 DA-02803 1 S 135 D B-02604
ELLIS DANIEL& HEITZ NANCY P AND RONALD L
ARACO-ELLIS PATRICIA 11401 SW 90TH
11290 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DB-04000 1S135DD-03612
ERVIN ROBERT&KIM HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B
11360 SW 92ND AVE FLORENCE L
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 54
GARIBALDI,OR 97118
1S135DC-08100 1S135DD-03608
FERRIER GERALD L&JOYCE H HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B&FLORENCE
11565 SW 90TH AVE c/o HERBERHOLZ LARRY
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 307
BANKS,OR 97106
1 S 135 DC-07900 1 S 135 D D-03618
FISHER JAYME K& HOGAN VERDEEN
DAVID THEREASA R 11380 SW LOMITA AVE
8400 SW CEDARCREST ST PORTLAND,OR 97223
PORTLAND, OR 97223
1S135D6-02603 1S135DD-03605
FREESTONE JAEWARD HUGHES JEFFREY M&TAMI JO BARE
11403 SW 90TH AVE 11485 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
J
1S135D�-03900 ` 15135DB-01900
JOHNSON CHARLEY F AND MATTHEWS MICHELE L
D.J.STRAUSBAUGH 11440 SW 91STAVE
11390 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DB-11600 1S135DD-03611
JUDD ESTHER A&GEOFFREY A MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R&K YVONNE
11301 SW 91 ST CT 5400 SW 198TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007
1S135DA-01401 1S135DA-02801
KC PROPCO HOLDING I LLC MCTAGGART BRENT
BY KNOWLEDGE LEARNING CORP PO BOX 231207
ATTN:TAX DEPT TIGARD,OR 97281
650 NE HOLLADAY ST#1400
PORTLAND, OR 97232
1S135DA-04800 1S135DB-11700
LAURENCE RAYMOND S&CARRIE A MEZENTSEV ALEKSANDR M&
8970 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST OTROKHOVA MIRA M
TIGARD, OR 97223 11285 SW 91ST CT
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135 D D-03615 1 S t 35 D B-02602
LAWHEAD JESSE A&JENNIFER L MILLER MAX&CHERYL
11470 SW LOMITA AVE 11435 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-00200 1S135DC-08200
LOFTUS LAURA 8 MOLITOR LAWRENCE R/NANCY L
WILHELM CLARE 11587 SW 90TH AVE
11275 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
15135DD-03617 1 S135DD-03614
LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN NEBERT SUSAN ETTA 8�TOMMY HENRY
11410 SW LOMITA AVE 11530 SW LOMITA
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-11200 15135DD-03613
MAHON SUSAN M NEBERT TOMMY HENRY
11310 SW 91ST CT SUSAN E
TIGARD, OR 97223 11530 SW LOMITA
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-04400 1S135DB-01800
MANSFIELD RYAN W 8 O'CALLAGHAN COLLEEN C
MANSFIELD VANESSA L 17702 OVERLOOK CIR
9055 SW N DAKOTA ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DB-10900 1S135DD-03600
MARSHALL SHEILA K OLSEN ERIK 8�
11266 SW 91ST CT WINFIELD HILARY
TIGARD,OR 97223 11600 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135Db-03619 ' 1S135D8-02800
OVIST DAVID SANDBO JOHN R AND DONNA M
17460 WREN CT TRAUBA DONNA M
LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 11475 SW 91ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02602 1S135DB-00100
PALACIOS DIONICIO MELCHOR& SCHAFFER HARRY E&
RAMIREZ MARICELA MELCHOR LILLIAN E TRS
9025 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11245 SW 90TH
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-11000 1S135DB-11800
PALLAS DIANE E SCHENDEL WILLIAM M JR
11280 SW 91 ST CT 11277 SW 91 ST AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-11100 1S135DA-04900
PETERSON MICHAEL B& SHOOK TERRY&PAIGE
LOUIE TINA L 8960 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
11292 SW 91ST CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135D6-02600 1S135DB-02700
POWLOSKI C KENT&LISA SIMONSEN RORY L&
11405 SW 90TH ADAMS CINDY l
TIGARD, OR 97223 11435 SW 91 ST AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-04200 1S135DD-05300
RADUT EMILIAN C&ADINA E SNYDER WILLIAM T&STEPHANIE
11310 SW 90TH AVE 11480 SW 90TH
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
15135DB-01600 1S135DB-12300
RAMIREZ JOSE C/MARIA TARHUNI JAMAL
11560 SW 91 ST 11347 SW 91 ST CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02900 1S135DD-03607
REPTA VASILE&LIDIA TASKAEVA SVETLANA
11400 SW 90TH AVE 11545 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-04300 1S135DB-11300
REPTA VASILE&LIDIA TENLY PROPERTIES CORP
11330 SW 90TH AVE 1055 NE 25TH AVE STE#A
TIGARD, OR 97223 HILLSBORO,OR 97124
1 S135DD-03620 1 5DB-1140
ROGERS ALAN D TENL P PERTIES CORP
11620 SW LOMITA AVE 105 E TH AVE STE#A
TIGARD, OR 97223 LSBOR , R 97124
1S135D"J-03616 '
THOMPSON DAMIEN&
TAMEZ-THOMPSON TAMERA
11440 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-0380D
VIAENE STEPHANIE L&KEVIN
11420 SW 92ND AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135DB-12000
VICE ALICIA K&RICHARD A
11375 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-03000
VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE
11405-11407 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-00500
WHITE BARBARA A
11495 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DB-01700
WHITMAN KATHLEEN R
11520 SW 91 ST AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DA-04000
WINDSOR PROPERTIES LTD
2245 NE CORNELL RD
HILLSBORO,OR 97124
1S135DD-03602
WORSECH HAROLD A
SANDRA K
11450 SW 90TH
TIGAR�,OR 97223
1 S 135D8-12900
ZUMWALT LINDA L
11491 SW 90TH AVE
PORTLAND, OR 97223
Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design �roup
PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren
Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120
Tigard, OR 97223
Sue Rorman Susan Beilke
11250 SW 82�d Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Naomi Gallucci Dayle D. & Evelyn 0. Beach
11285 SW 78th Avenue 11530 SW 72nd Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Diane Baldwin
3706 Kinsale Lane SE
Olympia, WA 98501
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136�h Place
Tigard, OR 97224
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 4B
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
CPO 4M
Pat Whiting
8122 SW Spruce
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\IabeIslCIT East.doc) UPDATED: 6-Aug-07
JUN.10.2008 09:11 #0864 P.002 /002
c�T� oF T�G��
CO?VIIv1UNITY DEVELOPMF'_�'T DF,PART_ME�'
P�'NING DNISIO�t ,�
131z5 SW HALL $C�ULEVARD
TI�ARD, QREGQ?V 97223 =
PF�OI�: 503•639-4171 ,�'AX: 503-6243681 ;;�_tt::: Pz�y.%Pi�:a;�n� £M.�,IL: a.� � o.
�=�:��� � �
REQ�TEST FQR ,�OOWFC�OT P�QPERTY �WN���AILING LIST
Propertyowner in{ormat.ion is va];d for 3 moz�ths frarn the date of yvur z�quest
�NDICAI'E AL�, PROfECT MAP.&��„pT,��E�] (i.e. 1SZ34�$,Ta.x L�t OC10D) OR 'I��F,
A:pD�FOR A�.L PRQ,j�CT PAR�LS BELOW;
OD G� qQ �i� �
�.. 3� �
PL��E AWARF THAT O Y 1 SE�" OF L�iE„ LS �ri L� SE PR�VIDED A'I' HT TI
�OLDI:�"C�YOU�t.,�VE�H8QR�00D MEET �'x
and the project p�ar�ner .has rev�ewed y�ur app�icau�for oe�p1 ene s�,� w�l be naafied b�rr�eans �
�,ncom.pleteness ,tet�ter to obtain y�ur 2 fin.al sers of labels. F Y of azi
TO TATN YOUR LAB�L PLE E ND CA E T���BE.�N NOTTFIET?BY PI ANNIN�
U SE �F LA$EL .
11�e 2 final se,u of 1ab�1s need to be p]aced on euvelopes (no se�f adhesive envelopes please) with first class letter-
rate astage ort the envelQp� in r�forr�z of post�ge stamps {no metered envelopes and no retum address) and
r��'�'xtted to the �ty£or the puzpose of pro � notice to properry own,ers of ih
azid the decis:o�, T�e 2 sets of envelopes must be ept separate. The persou lisud below will be called tQp�ck n
and payfor the labe}s w�en theyare ready, g up
�ME UF'Op�I`I'AC:T P�RSO�V: , li. �.�,./J��C'/ PHONE: _So 3.-�z g-Y��
NAM� Or Cp11r�PANy; ,
FAX: —�'�:._�.�.���7
EMAIL: �(���oU�.5Qr��c�
T�us request tr�ay be emailed, ma�iled fax �'
, ed, or hand deliv'ered zo the Ciry of Tigard. Please allow a 2-daY minaznum
for processir�g rc�uests. iJpoz� comp l�e�uon ot your request, t.li.e contact perso�, ]isted w�li b� called to ptck up their
reques�that wiIl be placed in"W�,1 Call.n by rhe co a.ny name (or by the conr.act person's last name af no co aza
at the Planning/En�neering Count�r at the Perznit�ncer. � 3�
7?le c�st of processing your reqtrest must b�paid at the time��pick up,as e:ratt cost can not be pre-ciecermiz�ed.
PLEASE N'OT�: FOR REASONS OF ACCU.RAC�', pNL�' ORZGINAL MAIL,�NG L�3,g,��
�'ROVIDED By T�X,� C,�'y VS. RE-TY,PED MAILING LABELS �LL BZ:ACG�PT�Ia,
st escri '�
$12 co ge��rate r,he mvliug�ist,plus gz �p�sheet for nu ' rhe list onto labe]s 20 acfdress�
prizar one set of abels�ythe numbe;of se�.s request d. � � per sb,eet), Then,muItiply tlze cost
- E.XANLPLE - - C(�ST Ft�R TI�IS REQ�.?EST -
�4 sheeis of 1�bels x SJ/s�cec= g�p x 2 sets = S1o.�0 �sFteet(s)oz iabels x S�sheet� �L� I
_shee�s of labels x$2/sber�for inreressed parties x STeu= .�:pp L shecc(s)of I:�beis x$z/sheet for�ince ed pa,rues •� � Se� �� �a�
. C�F rr.'R.�'rr r r �`_ ��l
� TD"�'Ai, f31.0a 1 - T07 - --
�
���
JUN.10.20C6 09:11 #0869 P.00i /002
. • � �
CP�D
C:umpbcll Platxning and Development
FA X TRANSM ISSION
DATE: � -�O - p�
TO: `✓G� 6'� --�l��,wjc� Fax:
/�.��� � ��3~���-3G�'I
FROM: Doug Campbeil PHONE #: (503)229-4449
FAX#: (503) 297-3537
RE� �yt4�l�� GIST
Number of pages including cover sheet: ,�
C:
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE LJSE OF THE INDIVIDUA�OR ENTITY TO WHICFi IT 15 ADDRESSE�, AND
MAY CONTAIN IN�ORMATIQN THAT I$ PRIViLEGED, C�NFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER
APPLICABLE LAW. If thp rpader of this messagA is nnt the intended recipient,nr thr;employes er agent responslblc Eor deiivering
the message to tl�e inlended recipient,y0U a�e hereby notified thdt 1ny dissemination,distfibution or oopying of this communicatlon
is strir.11y prohibited. If you I�ave received this communication in error, pl�se nntity us immediately by telephone,and returr�the
original message Io us at The above address via the United States Pny�l SeNice. Thank you.
C:�nr�ielt Ylanning and nevelopmenl Scrvices,Tnc. L-meul: duu<^iri-cnd-s�i•t•icrs,cvnz
3R51 SW Sp?,vznuu, Portland,pregon 97221
M LP2008-00005: 7/1 'S 4wners of Record
lAX IU OWNER ADDRESS CITY STATE
1S135DA02900 REPTA VASILE& LIDIA 11400 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD OR
Tuesday,July 01,2008 Page 1 of 1
� ,
q
:
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Administrative
Assistant for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
;Cha-k.�ppmpria�c&,xl�)li�4oa-1
� NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE DECISION FOR:
MLP2008-00005/REPTA PARTITION
❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name ReEerence)
� City of Tigard Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed
to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a
part hereof, on July 3, 2008, and dep ited in the United States Mail on ul 3, 2008, postage prepaid.
. ,
��� �
(Person t a Pr re Notice
STATE OF OREGON
County of Washington ss.
City of Tigard
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �' day of �(,C�� , 2008.
pFFICIAL SEAL � ��'uQi1
SIi1RLEV L TREAT ����-
NOTARY PUBLIC-ORE(30N
, ++ COMMISSION NO.418777 My Commission Expires: `-f l�S���
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 2S,2011
� � � � EXHIBIT�
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SF.i.i.F.R.
THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQLJIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, TT SHALL BE PROMPTLY
FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER.
NOTICE OF PENDING ��
-
LAND USE APPLICATION '
MINOR LAND PARTITION ' ' '
DATE OF NOTICE: July 3, 2008
FILE NO.: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2008-00005
FILE TITLE: REPTA PARTITION
APPLICANT/ APPLICANT'S
OWNER: Vasile & Lidia Repta REP: Campbell Plannin & Development, Inc.
11400 SW 90`h Avenue Attn: Doug,Camp�ell
Tigard, OR 97223 3851 SW 50`° Avenue
Portland, OR 97221
REQUEST: The applicant is requestin approval to Partition one 25 879-square foot (0.62-acre) lot into
two lots of 15,477 square �eet and 10,448 square feet. T�e applicant proposes to retain the
existing single-family home on Lot 1 and build a new single-family detached home on Lot 2.
Proposed Lot 2 will be a flag lot.
LOCATION: 11400 SW 90`h Avenue; Washington County Tax Map 1S135DA, Tax Lot 2900.
ZONE: R-4.5: Low Densit Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate
etac e sing e- ami y omes wit or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot
size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted
conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to t e Ciry ma ing any ecision on t e App icauon, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit
written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON
ULY 17, 2008. All comments should be directed to Cheryl Caines, Assciate Planner (x2437) in the Planning Division at
t e City o igard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reac t e City of Tigard by telephone at
503-639-4171 or by e-mail to cherylc@ti�ard-or.�ov.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON
THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS
WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS
ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR ULY 28, 2008. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE
SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE I HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL
BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING
INFORMATION:
� ,
• Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be
applicable to this proposal;
• Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a
response;
♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval
criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue.
FAILURE OF ANY PARTY TO ADDRESS THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA WITH SUFFICIENT
SPECIFICITY MAY PRECLUDE SUBSEQUENT APPEALS TO THE LAND U5E BOARD OF APPEALS OR
CIRCUIT COURT ON THAT ISSUE. SPECIFIC FINDINGS DIRECTED AT THE RELEVANT APPROVAL
CRITERIA ARE WHAT CONSTITUTE RELEVANT EVIDENCE.
AFTER THE 14-DAY COMMENT PEAIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE
DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED
WITHIN 5OO FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS
OTHEftWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRE55 ALL OF THE ItELEVANT APPROVAL
CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL
APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
• e app ication is accepte y t e City
• Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day
written comment period.
• The application is reviewed b� City Staff and affected agencies.
• City Staff issues a written decision.
• Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of
record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any
City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is
entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such
notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
e app ication, written comments an supporting ocuments relied upon by the Director to make this decision are
contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development
Department. If you want to inspect the file,please call and make an appointment with either the project planner or the planning
technicians. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service.
Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice
under the section titled"Your Ri�ht to Provide Written Comments."
r—�--- � � -
— '_
�"k'INl.11 M 11•
� —==—a����
y � T�[LP':'��t-�.,.,��
GGy =�=as���s
REPTA
�>> PAKTITI<lN
AKO ST
w
>
LE�IEN L�:
m
,L�L',IEiT
� SI'CE
1 '�
. .Q -�
GREF ��-� � � �
NBURG ���� � ..
! ^.�
W —
?O
o,`�' MITA N
E a
LN
ias�...o-a
TANG LAC .... .�o�.
a
nM ment a ae�e.JW . . Yrepc�
Vasile & Lidia Re ta �X �
p HIBIT�..
11400 SW 90`h Avenue MLP2008-00005
Tigard, OR 97223 REPTA PARTITION
Campbell Planning& Developmen�, Inc.
Attn: Doug Campbell
3851 SW 50`'' Avenue
Portland, OR 97221
� �
1S135D�-03300 ' 1S135DA-01500
1616 SHORELINE LLC& BECKAL LLC
LOMITA WEST LP 7100 SW GABLE PKWY
BY AFFINITY PROPERTY MGMT PORTLAND,OR 97225
421 SW 6TH AVE STE#905
PORTLAND, OR 97204
1 S135DA-05100 135DA-0160
2000-014 PARTITION PLAT B �
OWNERS OF LOTS 2-3 7100 GABLE PKWY
2993 N CANYON RD TLAN , R 97225
PROVO, UT 84604
135D8-13100 135DA-01700
2� -073 RTITION PLAT BE L
OW OF LOTS 2-3 710 GABLE PKWY
RTLA OR 97225
1S135D6•13000 1350A-03500
ANTNONY DENETTE L BE L
11483 SW 90TH AVE 7100 GABLE PKWY
TIGARD, OR 97223 TLAN , R 97225
1 S135DD-03606 15135DC-07200
APPLETON REYNOLD G& BELL CARROLL M
MARLER LINDA L 11600 SW 91 ST AVE
7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-12200 1S135DD•03604
ARCE JUAN P 8 ROSA M BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A
1 1369 SW 91 ST CT 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02802 1S135DA-01400
ARCHER CANDACE BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM
11300 SW 90TH AVE 11515 SW HALL BLVD
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
151350A-O5000 1 S135DA-03503
AVITIA ARMONDO L& BRAHMAPREMANANDA ASHRAMA
MARRON LILIA 1 1515 SW HALL BLVD
8950 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-12800 1S135D6-00600
BAXTER JENNIFER S BREWER SCOTT'R
1 1475 SW 90TH AVE 11545 5W 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-11500 1S135DD-03603
BECK NATHAN A&DAWNA R BROWN TRENT D&ALISON M
11315 SW 91 ST CT 11425 SW LaMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
�S135DA-02701 ' � 1S135DD-05500
BROYLES JENNIE A GAFFNEY BRIAN
11260 SW 90TH 11540 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-10800 1S'35DA-02702
CHONG BENTON L GATES NATHAN M 8�KATIE L
11250 SW 91 ST CT 11230 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DD-03609 1 S135DB-12100
DALE VIRGINIA E& GETZ VIRGINIA M
MACKINNON DANIEL W 13842 DAVANA TER
1 1625 SW�GMITA AVE SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91423
TIGARD, OR 97223
1 S135DD-05400 1 S135D6-00300
DOLL THOMAS C AND DORIS M GHITA VASILE&DOMNICA
11500 SW 90TH 11325 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-03000 1S135D6-02900
EATON LINDA L 8 RICHARD B HAMPTON KENNETH B&
9625 SW LEWIS LN KNOLL LAURA D
TIGARD, OR 97223 11515 SW 91STAVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DA-02803 1 S135DB-02604
ELLIS DANIEL 8� HEITZ NANCY P AND RONALD L
ARACO-ELLIS PATRICIA 11401 SW 90TH
11290 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-04000 1S135DD-03612
ERVIN ROBERT&KIM HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B
1 1360 SW 92ND AVE FLORENCE L
TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 54
GARIBALDI,OR 97118
1S135DC-08100 1S135DD-03608
FERRIER GERALD L&JOYCE H HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B&FLORENCE
11565 SW 90TH AVE c/o HERBERHOLZ LARRY
TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 307
BANKS,OR 97106
1S135DC-07900 1S135DD-03618
FISHER JAYME K& HOGAN VERDEEN
DAVID THEREASA R 11380 SW LOMITA AVE
8400 SW CEDARCREST ST PORTLAND,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135D8-02603 1S135DD-03605
FREESTONE JAEWARD HUGHES JEFFREY M&TAMI JO BARE
11403 SW 90TH AVE 11485 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D�-03900 • � 1S135D8-01900
JOHNSON CHARLEY F AND MATTHEWS MICHELt _
D.J. STRAUSBAUGH 11440 SW 91ST AVE
11390 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-11600 1S135DD-03611
JUDD ESTHER A 8 GEOFFREY A MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R 8 K YVONNE
11301 SW 91ST CT 5400 SW 198TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007
1S135DA•01401 1S135DA-02801
KC PROPCO HOLDING I LLC MCTAGGART BRENT
BY KNOWLEDGE LEARNING CORP PO BOX 231207
ATTN: TAX DEPT TIGARD,OR 97281
650 NE HOLLADAY ST#1400
PORTLAND, OR 97232
1 S 135DA-04800 1 S 135DB-11700
LAURENCE RAYMOND S&CARRIE A MEZENTSEV ALEKSANDR M&
8970 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST OTROKHOVA MIRA M
TIGARD,OR 97223 11285 SW 91ST CT
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135DD-03615 15135D8-02602
LAWHEAD JESSE A 6 JENNIFER L MILLER MAX&CHERYL
11470 SW LOMITA AVE 11435 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-D02D0 1S135DC-08200
LOFTUS LAURA& MOLITOR LAWRENCE R/NANCY L
WILHELM CLARE 11587 SW 90TH AVE
11275 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
�S135DD-03617 1S135DD-03614
LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN NEBERT SUSAN ETTA 8 TOMMY HENRY
11410 SW LOMITA AVE 11530 SW LOMITA
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
�S 135D8-11200 1 S135DD-03613
MAHON SUSAN M NEBERT TOMMY HENRY
11310 SW 91 ST CT SUSAN E
TIGARD, OR 97223 11530 SW LOMITA
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-04400 1S135DB-01800
MANSFIELD RYAN W& O'CALLAGHAN COLLEEN C
MANSFIELD VANESSA L 17702 OVERLOOK CIR
9055 SW N DAKOTA ST LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034
TIGARD, OR 97223
1 S 135D6-10900 1 S135DD-03600
MARSHALL SHEILA K OLSEN ERIK&
11266 SW 91ST CT WINFIELD HILARY
TIGARD,OR 97223 11600 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DD-03619 ' ' 1S135D6-02800
OVIST DAVID SANDBO JOHN R AN��ONNA M
17460 WREN CT TRAUBA DONNA M
LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 11475 SW 91ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02602 1S135DB-00100
PALACIOS DIONICIO MELCHOR& SCHAFFER HARRY E&
RAMIREZ MARICELA MELCHOR LILLIAN E TRS
9025 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11245 SW 90TH
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135D6-1 1000 1 S135DB-11800
PALLAS DIANE E SCHENDEL WILLIAM M JR
11280 SW 91 ST CT 11277 SW 91 ST AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-11100 1S135DA-04900
PETERSON MICHAEL B& SHOOK TERRY&PAIGE
LOUIE TINA L 8960 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
11292 SW 91 ST CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DB-02600 1 S135D6-02700
POWLOSKI C KENT 8�LISA SIMONSEN RORY L&
11405 SW 90TH ADAMS CINDY L
TIGARD, OR 97223 11435 SW 91STAVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-04200 1S135DD-05300
RADUT EMILIAN C&ADINA E SNYDER WILLIAM T&STEPHANIE
11310 SW 90TH AVE 11480 SW 90TH
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-01600 1S1350B-12300
RAMIREZ JOSE C/MARIA TARHUNI JAMAL
11560 SW 91 ST 11347 SW 91 ST CT
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02900 1S135DD-03607
REPTA VASILE 8 LIDIA TASKAEVA SVETLANA
11400 SW 90TH AVE 11545 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DA-04300 1 S135D8-11300
REPTA VASILE&LIDIA TENLY PROPERTIES CORP
1 1330 SW 90TH AVE 1055 NE 25TH AVE STE#A
TIGARD, OR 97223 HILLSBORO, OR 97124
1 S135DD-03620 1 5DB-1140
ROGERS ALAN D TENL P PERTIES CORP
11620 SW LOMITA AVE 105 E TH AVE STE#A
TIGARD,OR 97223 LSBOR , R 97124
1S1350 b-03616 ' ,
THOMPSON DAMIEN&
TAMEZ-THOMPSON TAMERA
11440 5W LOMITA AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-03800
VIAENE STEPHANIE L&KEVIN
11420 SW 92ND AVE
PORTLAND, OR 97223
1 S135D6-12000
VICE ALICIA K&RICHARD A
11375 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S1350A-03000
VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE
11405-11407 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1 S135D8-00500
WHITE BARBARA A
11495 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
t S135DB-01700
WHITMAN KATHLEEN R
11520 SW 91 ST AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-04000
WINDSOR PROPERTIES LTD
2245 NE CORNELL RD
HILLSBORO,OR 97124
1 S 135DD-03602
WORSECH HAROLD A
SANDRA K
11450 SW 90TH
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135D6-72900
ZUMWALT LINDA L
11491 SW 90TH AVE
PORTLAND, OR 97223
. t
� � �
Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design �roup
PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren
Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120
Tigard, OR 97223
Sue Rorman Susan Beilke
11250 SW 82�d Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place
Tigard, �R 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Naomi Gallucci Dayle D. & Evelyn 0. Beach
11285 SW 78�h Avenue 11530 SW 72nd Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Diane Baldwin
3706 Kinsale Lane SE
Olympia, WA 98501
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136�h Place
Tigard, OR 97224
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 46
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
CPO 4M
Pat Whiting
8122 SW Spruce
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES �i:lcurpin\setupllabelslClT East.doc) UPDATED: 6-Aug-07
��
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -
� �_ __. �._ .
I, Patricia L. Lunsford bein�first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Administrative
Assistant for the City of=I'iga ,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following:
�O�a-k.lFynp.w��&,�(s)Bebw�
❑x NOTTC� OF PENDING LAND LJSE DEQSION FOR
MLP2008-00005/VAR2008-00022 - REPTA PARTTTTON
� AMENDEDNOTICE
(File[Va/Nanr Re(ercncc)
� City of Tigard Plaruung Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked E�ibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each
named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on
August 12,2008, and deposited in the Unit d States Mail on August 12,2008,postage prepaid.
/ _„
< �,.�1 �C�
(Person repared Nodce)
STATE OF OREGON
County of Washington) ss.
City of Tigard )
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the °� dayof ��u�� ,2008.
OFFICIAL SEAL � l��
BHIRLEY L TREAT NOTARY P C OF OREGO
NOTARY PUBLIC-ORE(30N �1�,5��
•� COMMISSION N0.416777 MyCommission Expires:
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 25,2011
� EXHIBIT.1�
N�TIC�TOMORTGAC�E,LIENHOLDER,VENDORORSELLER
THE TIGAKD DEVELOPMENT OODE REQUIRES 'IHAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTTC�, IT SHAI.I_ BE PROMI'TLY
FORWARDED TO TI�PURQ�ISER
"RE VISE D"
NOTICE OF PENDING '�
LAND USE APPLICATION
=
MINOR LAND PARTITION � � �
THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN REVISED TO INCLUDE A REQUEST FOR AN ADfUSTMENT TO THE STREET
IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS AS DESCRIBED IN ITALICS BELO� THE DUE DATE FOR THE COMMENT
PERIOD AND THE TENTATIVE DECISION DATE HAVE BEEN EXTENDED ACCORDINGLY.
DATE OF NOTICE: August 12, 2008
FILE NOS.: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2008-00005
ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2008-00022
FILE TITLE: RE PTA PARTITION
APPLICANT/ APPLICANT'S
OWNER Vasile &Lidia Repta REP.: Campbell Plaruiing&Development,Inc.
11400 SW 90�h Avenue Attn: Doug Campbell
Tigard,OR 97223 3851 SW 50�h Avenue
Portland,OR 97221
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to Partition one 25,879-square foot (0.62-acre) lot into two lots of 15,477
square feet and 10,448 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain the existing sm�gle-family home on I.ot 1
and build a new single-family detached home on Lot 2. Proposed Lot 2 will be a tlag lot. AnAd�ustrrern l.as
also F,�c t�l to tlae St�I��rn Stane�irr�s to allarvm�rP tlzzn 20 aavts to aass ano a ad-d�sac Tlns rrz�imrm
zs eec���e tlaere are czmeruly 18 s�famly w�i1s arzl app�aximztely 39 mrlti farrily iaaxs tlxr�lazze aax3s ov�o SW
L onita A zerne�
LOCATION: 11400 SW 90�Avenue;Washington CountyTax Map 1S135DA.,Tax Lot 2900.
ZONE: R 4.5: Low Density Residential. The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family
homes with or without accessory residential units at a minirnum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and
attached single-family uniu are pemutted conditionally. Some civic and insututional uses are also pemutted
conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.745,
18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby rovided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written
comments on the application to the Ciry. THE FOURTEEN �14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON
AUGUST 26, 2008. All commenu should be directed to Cheryl Caines, Assc�ate Planner (�437) in the Planning Division at the
City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at 503-639-4171
or bye-ma�l to cherylc c tigard-or.gov.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE
DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-
MAKING PROCESS
'THE QTY OF TTGARD APPREQATES nECEIVING COMNIENTS AND VALiJ�,� YOUR INPUT. CONIlVIENTS WILL
BE GONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WIT�-IIN Tf� NOTI� OF DEQSION. A DEQSION ON T�IIS ISSUE IS
TENTATTVELY SQ�EDULED FOR AUGUST 29,2008. IF YOU PROVIDE COMNIENTS,YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY
OF '1�-� FULL DEQSION ONC� IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COIvIlVIEN'TS WILL BECOME A PART OF
T'HE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONI'AIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
. Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be
ap�licable to this proposal;
• Ra�se any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response;
• Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with
sufficient specificity on that issue.
FAILURE OF ANY PARTY TO ADDRESS T�-�E RELEVANT APPROVAL QZITERIA WITH SLTFFIQENT SPEQFIQTY
MAY PREQ.UDE SUBSEQUENT APPEALS TO TF-�E LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS OR QRCLTIT COURT ON
THAT ISSLTE. SPEQFIC FINDINGS DIREGTED AT Tf-�E RELEVANf APPROVAL C�IT'ERIA ARE WHAT
CONSTTTU'1'E RELEVAN'f EVIDENCE.
AFTER TF-IE 14-DAY COMNIENT PERIOD CLOSES, Tf-IE DIRECTOR SNALL ISSUE A 1�PE II ADMI1vISTRATTVE DEQSION. TrIE
DIRECTOR'S DEQSION SHAI_L BE MAILED TO THE APPLICAN'I'AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500
FEET OF T'HE SUBJECI'SIT'E,AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WAITTEN CODRv1ENTS OR WHO IS OTf-IERWISE ENTITLED TO
NOT'IC�. 7� DIRECTOR'S DEQSION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF Tf-IE RELEVANT APPROVAL QZITERIA. BASED L1I'ON Tf-IE C�17'ERIA
AND TI-�FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN TF-IE RECORD,T'HE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THF.
REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACITON.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
• The application is accepted by the City
• Notice �s sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written
comment period.
• The application is reviewed b�City Staff and affected agencies.
. Ciry Staff issues a written dec�sion.
• Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record
of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any Caty-recognized
neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an
intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise
entitled to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FORREVIEW:
The application, written conunents and supporting docwnents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained
within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. If you want to
inspect the file,please call and rr�ake an appointment with either the project planner or the planning technicians. Copies of these items may
be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for tivs service. Questions regarding this application should be
directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of tivs Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written
Comments."
----�
, � -- ----- '�- -
_ �,_
�
�—' � \l��ltilll��l.\I'
� � — -------___
�� _'nu.i�_:,�s_:e���
y�y \ REPT,�__---
��j PAR'fl'1'1��N
AK ST
>
LEt.ENI�:
� ,1,EJEi:T
.7fE
r
J '(
o f
Gr1FFN ��� I.
B�RC .r
—�%[,
�'� 4 H
ITA
ELA �
�N �
T C . �.e
�
Vasile & Lidia Repta EXHIBIT�
11400 SW 90`h Avenue MLP2008-00005
Tigard, OR 97223 REPTA PARTITION
Campbell Planning & Development, Inc.
Attn: Doug Campbell
3851 SW 50`h Avenue
Portland, OR 97221
1S135D 0-03300 1S135DA-01500
1616 SHORELINE LLC 8 BECKAL LLC
LOMITA WEST LP 7100 SW GABLE PKWY
BY AFFINITY PROPERTY MGMT PORTLAND, OR 97225
421 SW 6TH AVE STE#905
PORTLAND, OR 97204
1S135DA-O5100 135DA-01600
2000-014 PARTITION PLAT g �
OWNERS OF LOTS 2-3 7100 GABLE PKWY
2993 N CANYON RD P TLAN , R 97225
PROVO, UT 84604
13508-13100 135DA-01700
20 -073 RTITION PLAT BE L
OW OF LOTS 2-3 710 GABLE PKWY
RTLA OR 97225
1S135D6-13000 135DA-03500
ANTHONY DENETTE L BE L
1 1483 SW 90TH AVE 7100 GABLE PKWY
TIGARD,OR 97223 TLAN , R 97225
1S�35DD-03606 1S135DC-072D0
APPLETON REYNOLD G 8 BELL CARROLL M
MARLER LINDA L 11600 SW 91STAVE
7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-12200 15135DD-03604
ARCE JUAN P 8 ROSA M BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A
1 1369 SW 91 ST CT 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02802 1S135DA-01400
ARCHER CANDACE BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM
1 1300 SW 90TH AVE 11515 SW HALL BLVD
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-O5000 151350A-03503
AVITIA ARMONDO L& BRAHMAPREMANANDA ASHRAMA
MARRON LILIA 11515 SW HALL BLVD
8950 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARO, OR 97223
1 S135DB-12800 1 S135�B-00600
BAXTER JENNIFER S BREWER SCOTT R
1 1475 SW 9DTH AVE 11545 5W 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D8-11500 15135DD�03603
BECK NATHAN A& DAWNA R BROWN TRENT D&ALISON M
1 1315 SW 91 ST CT 11425 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S�35DA-02701 1 S 135DD-O5500
BROYLES JENNIE A GAFFNEY BRIAN
11260 SW 90TH 11540 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-t0800 1S!35DA-02702
CHONG BENTON L GATES NATHAN M&KATIE L
11250 SW 91ST CT 11230 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135DD-03609 1 S 135D8-12100
DALE VIRGINIA E 8 GETZ VIRGINIA M
MACKINNON DANIEL W 13842 DAVANA TER
1 1625 SW LUMITA AVE SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91423
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DD-05400 1S135D6-00300
DOLL THOMAS C AND DORIS M GHITA VASILE 8 DOMNICA
1 1500 SW 90TH 1 1325 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-03000 1S135DB-02900
EATON LINDA L 8�RICHARD B HAMPTON KENNETH B�
9625 SW LEWIS LN KNOLL LAURA D
TIGARD, OR 97223 11515 SW 91ST AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DA-02803 1 S135D8-02604
ELLIS DANIEL 8 HEITZ NANCY P AND RONALD L
ARACO-ELLIS PATRICIA 11401 SW 90TH
11290 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135D6-04000 1S135DD-03612
ERVIN ROBERT 8 KIM HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B
11360 SW 92ND AVE FLORENCE L
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 54
GARIBALDI,OR 97118
1S135DC-08100 1S135D0-03608
FERRIER GERALD L 8 JOYCE H HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B 8 FLORENCE
1 1565 SW 90TH AVE c/o HERBERHOLZ LARRY
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 307
BANKS,OR 97106
15135DC-07900 1S135DD-03618
FISHER JAYME K& HOGAN VERDEEN
DAVID THEREASA R 11380 SW LOMITA AVE
8400 SW CEDARCREST ST PORTLAND, OR 97223
PORTLAND, OR 97223
t 5135DB-02603 1 S 135DD-03605
FREESTONE JAEWARD HUGHES JEFFREY M 8 TAMI JO BARE
11403 5W 90TH AVE 11485 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGAR�,OR 97223
�S135Dd-03900 1S135D6-01900
JOHNSON CHARLEY F AND MATTHEWS MICHELE�
D.J. STRAUSBAUGH 11440 SW 91 ST AVE
11390 5W 92N0 AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
1 St 35D8-11600 1 St 350D-03611
JUDD ESTHER A&GEOFFREY A MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R&K YVONNE
11301 SW 91ST CT 5400 SW 198TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007
1S135DA-01401 1S135DA-02801
KC PROPCO HOLDING I LLC MCTAGGART BRENT
BY KNOWLEDGE LEARNING CORP PO BOX 231207
ATTN. TAX DEPT TIGARD,OR 97281
650 NE HOLLADAY ST#1400
PORTLAND, OR 97232
1 S135DA-04800 1 S135DB-11700
LAURENCE RAYMOND S 8 CARRIE A MEZENTSEV ALEKSANDR M 8
8970 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST OTROKHOVA MIRA M
TIGARD, OR 97223 11285 SW 91ST CT
PORTLAN�, OR 97223
1 S 135DD-03615 1 S 135D8-02602
LAWHEAD JESSE A 8 JENNIFER L MILLER MAX�CHERYL
11470 SW LOMITA AVE 11435 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D8-00200 1 S135DC-08200
LOFTUS LAURA 8 MOLITOR LAWRENCE R/NANCY L
WILHELM CL4RE 11587 5W 90TH AVE
11275 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S13500-03617 1 S135D0-03614
LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN NEBERT SUSAN ETTA 8 TOMMY HENRY
11410 5W LOMITA AVE 1 1530 SW LOMITA
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-11200 1S135DD-03613
MAHON SUSAN M NEBERT TOMMY HENRY
11310 SW 91 ST CT SUSAN E
TIGARD, OR 97223 11530 SW LOMITA
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S735DA-04400 1S135D8-01800
MANSFIELD RYAN W& O'CALLAGHAN COLLEEN C
MANSFIELD VANESSA L 17702 OVERLOOK CIR
9055 SW N DAKOTA ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135D8-10900 1S135DD-03600
MARSHALL SHEILA K OLSEN ERIK 8
11266 SW 91ST CT WINFIELD HILARY
TIGARD, OR 97223 11600 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 St 35DD-03619 1 S135D8-02800
OVIST DAVID SANDBO JOHN R AND uONNA M
17460 WREN CT TRAUBA DONNA M
LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 11475 SW 91ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135DA-02602 1 S1350B-00100
PALACIOS DIONICIO MELCHOR 8 SCHAFFER HARRY E&
RAMIREZ MARICELA MELCHOR LILLIAN E TRS
9025 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11245 SW 90TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-11000 iS135DB-i1800
PAILAS DIANE E SCHENDEL WILLIAM M JR
11280 SW 91ST CT 11277 SW 91STAVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D6-11100 1S135DA-04900
PETERSON MICHAEL B& SHOOK TERRY&PAIGE
LOUIE TINA L 8960 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
1 1292 SW 91 ST CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
t St 35D8-02600 1 S135D8-02700
POWLOSKI C KENT 8 LISA SIMONSEN RORY L 8
1 1405 SW 90TH ADAMS CINDY L
TIGARD, OR 97223 11435 SW 915T AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DA-04200 1 S 135DD-05300
RADUT EMILIAN C 8 ADINA E SNYDER W�LLIAM T 8 STEPHANIE
11310 SW 90TH AVE 11480 SW 90TH
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D6-01600 1S135DB-12300
RAMIREZ JOSE C/MARIA TARHUNI JAMAL
1 1560 SW 91 ST 11347 SW 91 ST CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02900 1S135DD-03607
REPTA VA51LE 8 LIDIA TASKAEVA SVETLANA
1 1400 SW 90TH AVE 11545 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135DA-04300 1 S 1350 B-11300
REPTA VASILE&LIDIA TENLY PROPERTIES CORP
11330 SW 90TH AVE 1055 NE 25TH AVE STE#A
TIGARD,OR 97223 HILLSBORO,OR 97124
15135DD-03620 1 SDB-1140
ROGERS ALAN D TENI P PERTIES CORP
11620 SW LOMITA AVE 105 E TH AVE STE#A
TIGARD,OR 97223 L560R , R 97124
1S135D 0-03616
THOMPSON DAMIEN&
TAMEZ-TNOMPSON TAMERA
11440 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135D6-03800
VIAENE STEPHANIE l 8 KEVIN
11420 SW 92ND AVE
PORTLAND, OR 97223
1S135DB-12000
VICE ALICIA K&RICHARD A
11375 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S1350A-03000
VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE
11405-11407 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1 S135D8-00500
WHITE BARBARA A
11495 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-0�700
WHITMAN KATHLEEN R
11520 SW 91 ST AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DA-Oa000
WINDSOR PROPERTIES LTD
2245 NE CORNELL RD
HILLSBORO,OR 97124
t St 35DD-03602
WORSECH HAROLD A
SANDRA K
11450 SW 90TH
TIGARD, OR 97223
t S135DB-12900
ZUMWALT LINDA L
11491 SW 90TH AVE
PORTLAND, OR 97223
Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design �roup
PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren
Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120
Tigard, OR 97223
Sue Rorman Susan Beilke
11250 SW 82�d Avenue 11755 SW 114'h Place
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Naomi Gallucci Dayle D, & Evelyn 0. Beach
11285 SW 78'h Avenue 11530 SW 72nd Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Diane Baldwin
3706 Kinsale Lane SE
Olympia, WA 98501
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136'h Place
Tigard, OR 97224
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 46
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
CPO 4M
Pat Whiting
8122 SW Spruce
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:lcurpin\setupllabelslClT East.doc) UPDATED: 6-Aug-07
��
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -
�
�
I, Patricia L. Lunsfond, bein first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Aciininistrative
Assistant for the City of Tiga�, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
((]�eck.�x.nq,dn.�IL,s(.)Ikba�I
❑x NOTTC� OF DEQSION FOR
MI,P2008-00005/VAR2008-00022- REPTA PARTITION
(File Nn./Nanv Re(erenee�
� AMENDEDNOTI�
� City of Tigard Plamiing Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,vvas mailed to each
named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and byreference made a part hereof,on
August 29,2008, and deposite in the United S tes ' on August 29,2008,postage prepa.id.
(Person that P amd Notice
STATE OF ORE GON
County of Washington) ss.
City of Tigard )
Subscribed and sworn/affinned before me on the �� dayof (��-���— ,2008.
o�cu►�s�x
=FIIRLEY L TItEAT
`, ' NOTARY PUBUC-ORECiON �� � ��
►` COMMISSION N0.118777 �
MY COMI�SSION EXPIRES APRII 2S,20» NO ARY PUB C OF OREGON
MyCommission Expires: �F/asl r i
� EXHlBIT �
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
, •�
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2008-00005 :
REPTA PARTITION
(Includes a 30 dayextension) 120 DAYS = 11/10/2008
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: REPTA PARTITION
CASE NOS.: Minor Land Partition(MLP) MLP2008-00005
Adjustment (VAR) VAR2008-00022
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to partition one (1) existing .62 acre site
into two (2� parcels. The ex�stuzg residence on Parcel 1 will remain and is used for senior
care with five (5) residents, which is a permitted use within the zone. Parcel2 will be used
for a new single-family residence. Parcel 1 will be 15,477 square feet and Parcel 2 will be
10,448 square feet. An Adjustment has also been requested to the Street Improvement
Standards to allow access from Parcel2 onto the Lomita Avenue cul-de-sac. The maxiinum
allowed units is twenty(20) onto cul-de-sacs. This maX;�„um is currently exceeded because
there are eight �8) single-family units, ten (10) duplexes, and approximately eighty-eight (88)
multi-family uruts that have access onto SW Lorruta Avenue. TI'he adjustment w�71 aIlow the
applicant to uicrease that number by one additional unit.
APPLICANT & Vasile Repta APPLICANT'S Campbell Plaru�ing&Development,Inc.
OWNER 11400 SW 90`''Avenue REP.: Attn: Doug Campbell
Tigard,OR 97223 3851 SW 50`�'Avenue
Portland,OR 97221
COMPRE HENSI VE
PLAN
DESIGNATION: R 4.5;I.ow DensityResidential.
ZONE: R 4.5 Low Densi Residential. The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate
etac e sing e- a �y omes with or without accessory residential units at a minunum lot size
of 7,500 square feet. DuPlexes and attached single-facrvly uni�s are perniitted conditionally.
Some civic and uistitutional uses are also perniitted conditionally.
LOCATION: 11400 SW 90`''Avenue;WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lot 2900.
PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 15,447 Square Feet.
PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 10,448 Square Feet.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370 (Variances and Ad1'ustments ; 18.390
(D ecision-1Vlaku�g Procedures�; 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning istricts);
18.705 (Access Egress and Cu-culation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.745 (Landsca ing
and Screening�; 18.765 (Off-Street parking and Loading Requirements); 18.790 ('I'ree
Removal)• 18795 (Visual Clearance Areas); and 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement
Standards�.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the Ciry of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the
above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at i
c��x�. I
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for ir�spection at no cost or copies can be
obtained for twenty-five cents (25�) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the tune of the request.
SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owner of record within the required distance
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 29, 2008 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 16, 2008 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
DA- De-al-:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise
adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as�provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in
accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code wluch provides that a
written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director v�nthin ten �10) busuless days of the
date the Notice of Dec�sion was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and foi-ms are ava able from the I'lanning
Division of Tigard CityHall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the
specific issues identified in the wntten comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional
evidence concerning issues.properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be subrrutted by any party durui_g the appeal
hearing,subject to any addrtional rules of procedure that maybe adopted from tune to tune by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2008.
Fo�estions:
r infornzation�please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Che Glines at (503) 639-4171, Tigard
CityHall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 or byemail to chei,�-�cC�ti�,ard-or.gov.
— �; .
��
� ,�— � .. . .
� � �u irvrr5 nt.�r.
�
� _------_
� ,y '�� D1LP':�x-�����;
�h _�______�
RE I'T.�
�>> P.�IRTITI<�N
sr
w
>
LE�3ENl�:
°� si�e.le�-r
+Tf E
�� ��
. .a �;
�F �. I.
Fryg�RC � ...' :
��
O
o,`�' MITA N
A ��N
T A C ... ...,,..
t
�N 1 a s ��
L ' -
, �
� � �`<iF_________ar________��q" QS
a I� . �
I I�w� � i_J'`. �j�:� £_�:�d3:'_ � r__'_ r.�-
�� � 1
� II � �p —_ g � s YT�,a
�. ��� ��' r,; I
� ��n;., __ _�--' �,�� r;� � m ''
! I 1 I', 11 t,_;`S- ."�. ,�y,,,. � ,o�.,�
�J. �, �JL ' _ --• .' _ _ �• G57!
' I r� I�r-= � ` -r� I�' � =��L� `���� __ _ � �
� y'�� � ' - -- - � L-:-�- ,
�!� '�.�?�-�--- _ � ,-�,�=; ����� � ,---, � , I
� I i� „_�; � � �s � - -_- � -� �� -- I
I fl—,� ,__ _ �� � -, �- -- �_ /
� i L_ ,r"� "' - �.�,�,�--- "J°�
I ' ��_- ------------��., <r, sa' . '��---� - --�- ---- -- �
� --rsr+r_���__—_ -
� � —-- — :^.t':. �'� ..__ . I
ra°�"� •�f \i' ��{,
�=maa=x.. "� : �
� ���w_...; �as-..m _�_ - i��
��asss�r- - -- ` - \ � ¢
m'�r-.� ---- - \ �
-- m�, `;�at-r:�sQ � \
FiNAL APPROVAL m�_v :�`�� �;w� 10';
Cin�no�rao Purw+rw avia� � �'��' �
� "= _-
BYC C°-�.nti JATE L'�9-o8 I e�saizms�- ��y��/ ^:i�s "�`��...R �
`----- --- •si'b�'17Y�S'� !i� � an.w ,wwww� ,'
1S135DD-03300 1S135DA-01500 EXH i B IT...�.
1616 SHORELINE LLC 8 BECKAL LLC
LOMITA WEST LP 7100 SW GABLE PKWY
BY AFFINITY PROPERTY MGMT PORTLAND,OR 97225
421 SW 6TH AVE STE#905
PORTLAND, OR 97204
1S135DA-05100 1 135DA-01600
2000-014 PARTITION PLAT BE L C
OWNERS OF LOTS 2-3 7100 GABLE PKWY
2993 N CANYON RD P TLAND,OR 97225
PROVO, UT 84604
1 135D8-1310 1 135DA-0170
20 -07 ARTITION PLAT BE L C
OW OF LOTS 2-3 710 GABLE PKWY
RTLAN ,OR 97225
1 S135D6-13000 1 35DA-0350
ANTHONY DENETTE L BE L C
11483 SW 90TH AVE 7100 GABLE PKWY
TIGARD, OR 97223 P TLAN ,OR 97225
1 S 135DD-03606 1 S 135DC-072D0
APPLETON REYNOLD G 8 BELL CARROLL M
MARLER LINDA L 11600 SW 91ST AVE
7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
1 S135DB-12200 1 S135�D-03604
ARCE JUAN P& R05A M BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A
11369 SW 91 ST CT 11455 5W LOMITA AVENUE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02602 1S135DA-01400
ARCHER CANDACE BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM
11300 SW 90TH AVE 11515 SW HALL BLVD
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-05000 1 5DA-03503
AVITIA ARMONDO L& BRA P ANANDA ASHRAMA
MARRON LILIA 1151 LL BLVD
8950 SW NORTH DAKOTA TI ARD,OR 7223
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DB-12800 1S135DB•00600
BAXTER JENNIFER S BREWER SCOTT R
11475 SW 90TH AVE 11545 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-11500 1S135DD-03603
BECK NATHAN A 8 DAWNA R BROWN TRENT D 8 ALISON M
11315 SW 91 ST CT 11425 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02701 1S135DD-05500
BROYLES JENNIE A GAFFNEY BRIAN
11260 SW 90TH 11540 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
t S 135D8-10800 1 S135DA-02702
CHONG BENTON L GATES NATHAN M 8 KATIE L
11250 SW 91ST CT 11230 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DD-03609 1S135DB-12100
DALE VIRGINIA E 8 GETZ VIRGINIA M
MACKINNON DANIEL W 13842 DAVANA TER
11625 SW LOMITA AVE SHERMAN OAKS,CA 91423
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DD-05400 1S135D8-00300
DOLL THOMAS C AND DORIS M GHITA VASILE&DOMNICA
11500 SW 90TH 11325 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-03000 1S135DB-02900
EATON LINDA L 8 RICHARD B HAMPTON KENNETH B 8
9625 SW LEWIS LN KNOLL LAURA D
TIGARD, OR 97223 11515 SW 91ST AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
15135DA-02803 1S135DB-02604
ELLIS DANIEL 8 HEITZ NANCY P AND RONALD L
ARACO-ELLIS PATRICIA 11401 SW 90TH
11290 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-04000 7S135DD-03612
ERVIN ROBERT&KIM HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B
11360 SW 92ND AVE FLORENCE L
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 54
GARIBALDI,OR 97118
1S135DC-08�00 1S135DD-03608
FERRIER GERALD L&JOYCE H HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B&FLORENCE
11565 SW 90TH AVE c/o HERBERHOLZ LARRY
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 307
BANKS,OR 97106
1S135DC-07900 15135DD-03618
FISHER JAYME K& HOGAN VERDEEN
DAVID THEREASA R 11380 SW LOMITA AVE
8400 SW CEDARCREST ST PORTLAND,OR 97223
PORTLAND, OR 97223
1 S135DB-02603 1 S135DD-03605
FREESTONE JAEWARD HUGHES JEFFREY M 8 TAMI JO BARE
11403 SW 90TH AVE 11485 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1$135DB-03900 1S135DB•01900
JOHNSON CHARLEY F AND MATTHEWS MICHELE L
D.J. STRAUSBAUGH 11440 SW 91 ST AVE
11390 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D8-11600 1 S135DD-03611
JUDD ESTHER A 8 GEOFFREY A MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R&K YVONNE
11301 SW 91 ST CT 5400 SW 198TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007
15135DA-014D1 1S135DA-02801
KC PROPCO HOLDING I LLC MCTAGGART BRENT
BY KNOWLEDGE LEARNING CORP PO BOX 231207
ATTN:TAX DEPT TIGARD,OR 97281
650 NE HOLLADAY ST#1400
PORTLAND, OR 97232
1S135DA-04800 1S135DB-11700
LAURENCE RAYMOND S&CARRIE A MEZENTSEV ALEKSANDR M 8
8970 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST OTROKHOVA MIRA M
TIGARD, OR 97223 11285 SW 91 ST CT
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S135DD-03615 1 S135D8-02602
LAWHEAD JESSE A&JENNIFER L MILLER MAX&CHERYL
11470 SW LOMITA AVE 11435 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-00200 1S135DC-08200
LOFTUS LAURA& MOLITOR LAWRENCE R/NANCY L
WILHELM CLARE 11587 SW 90TH AVE
11275 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DD-03617 1S135DD-03614
LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN NEBERT SUSAN ETTA 8 TOMMY HENRY
11410 SW LOMITA AVE 11530 SW LOMITA
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-11200 1S135DD-03613
MAHON SUSAN M NEBERT TOMMY HENRY
11310 SW 91 ST CT SUSAN E
TIGARD, OR 97223 11530 SW LOMITA
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-D4400 1S135DB-01800
MANSFIELD RYAN W 8 O'CALLAGHAN COLLEEN C
MANSFIELD VANESSA L 17702 OVERLOOK CIR
9055 SW N DAKOTA ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135D6-10900 1S135DD-03600
MARSHALL SHEILA K OLSEN ERIK&
11266 SW 91ST CT WINFIELD HILARY
TIGARD,OR 97223 11600 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DD-03619 1S135DB-02800
OVIST DAVID SANDBO JOHN R AND DONNA M
17460 WREN CT TRAUBA DONNA M
LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 11475 SW 91ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02602 1S135D8-00100
PALACIOS DIONICIO MELCHOR& SCHAFFER HARRY E&
RAMIREZ MARICELA MELCHOR LILLIAN E TRS
9025 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11245 SW 90TH
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135D6-11000 1 S135D6-11800
PALLAS DIANE E SCHENDEL WILLIAM M JR
11280 SW 91 ST CT 11277 SW 91 ST AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-11100 1S135DA-04900
PETERSON MICHAEL B& SHOOK TERRY&PAIGE
LOUIE TINA L 8960 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
11292 SW 91 ST CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
1 S 135 D B-02600 1 S 135 D B-02700
POWLOSKI C KENT&LISA SIMONSEN RORY L&
11405 SW 90TH ADAMS CINDY L
TIGARD, OR 97223 11435 SW 91 ST AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135 DA-04200 1 S 13 5 D D-05300
RADUT EMILIAN C 8 ADINA E SNYDER WILLIAM T&STEPHANIE
11310 SW 90TH AVE 11480 SW 90TH
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DB-01600 1 S135DB-12300
RAMIREZ JOSE C/MARIA TARHUNI JAMAL
11560 SW 91 ST 11347 SW 91 ST CT
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02900 1S135DD-03607
REPTA VASILE&LIDIA TASKAEVA SVETLANA
11400 SW 90TH AVE 11545 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-04300 1S135D8-11300
REPTA VASILE 8�LIDIA TENLY PROPERTIES CORP
11330 SW 90TH AVE 1055 NE 25TH AVE STE#A
TIGARD, OR 97223 HILLSBORO, OR 97124
1S135DD-03620 35DB-11400•
ROGERS ALAN D TENL PERTIES CORP
11620 SW LOMITA AVE 105 E 2 AVE STE#A
TIGARD,OR 97223 LLSBORO,O 97124
15135DD�3616
THOMPSON DAMIEN&
TAMEZ-THOMPSON TAMERA
11440 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
15135DB-03800
VIAENE STEPHANIE L&KEVIN
11420 SW 92ND AVE
PORTLAND, OR 97223
1S135D8-12000
VICE ALICIA K&RICHARD A
11375 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DA-03000
VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE
11405-11407 SW LOMITA AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DB-00500
WHITE BARBARA A
11495 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DB-01700
WHITMAN KATHLEEN R
11520 5W 91 ST AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135DA-04000
WINDSOR PROPERTIES LTD
2245 NE CORNELL RD
HILLSBORO,OR 97124
1 S135DD-03602
WORSECH HAROLD A
SANDRA K
11450 SW 90TH
TIGARD, OR 97223
'I S 135D8-12900
ZUMWALT LINDA L
11491 SW 90TH AVE
PORTLAND, OR 97223
Nathan and Ann Murdock
Mildren Design �roup
PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren
Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120
Tigard, OR 97223
Sue Rorman Susan Beilke
11250 SW 82�d Avenue 11755 SW 114�h Place
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Naomi Gallucci Dayle D. & Evelyn 0. Beach
11285 SW 78th Avenue 11530 SW 72nd Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Diane Baldwin
3706 Kinsale Lane SE
Olympia, WA 98501
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136'h Place
Tigard, OR 97224
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 46
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
CPO 4M
Pat Whiting
8122 SW Spruce
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES �i:\curpin\setupllabels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 6-Aug-07
. ,
��
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -
I, Patricia L. Lunsford bein�fust duly sworn/affimi, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Administrative
Assistant for the City of zI'iga ,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
;i]ti�k-�k,�>npdne&,zl•)NrG�u��
❑X NOTIC� OF DEQSION FOR
MLP2008-00005/VAR2008-00022 - REPTA PARTTTTON
(File IVO./Name Reference)
� AMENDEDNOTIC�
� City of Tigarcl Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked E�chibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each
named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and byreference made a part hereof,on
August 29,2008,and deposite ' the United Mail on August 29,2008,postage prepaid.
. c.�
(I'erson tha pared No�
STATE OF ORE GON
County of Washington) ss.
City of Tigard )
,.��
Subscribed and sworn/affumed before me on the l� dayof �C��� ,2008.
OFFICIAL SEAL
SNIRLEY L TREAT
NOTARY PUBUC-OREdON a ��-
��+ COMMISSION NO.418777 O�
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 25,2011 NO ARY PUB C OF OREGON
My Corrunission E�ires: �a-�l<<
� � EXHIBIT..�..
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
, ��
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2008-00005 :
RE PTA PARTITION
(Includes a 30 da}'esteiuioci) 120 DAYS = 11/1�/2CC8
SECTION I. APPLICATION SLJMMARY
FILE NAME: REPTA PARTITION
CASE NOS.: Minor Land Partition(MLP) MLP2008-00005
Adjustment (VAR) VAR2008-00022
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to partition one (1) existing .62 acre site into
two (2) parcels. The ex�stuzg residence on Parcel 1 w11 remaui and is used for senior care with
five (5) residents, which is a permitted use within the zone. Parcel 2 will be used for a new
single-family residence. Parce�l 1 will be 15,477 square feet and Parcel 2 will he 10,448 s uare
feet. An Adjustment has also been requested to the Street Im� provement Standards to �ow
access from Parcel 2 onto the Lomita Avenue cul-de-sac. The maX�mum allowed units is
twenry(20) onto cul-de-sacs. This ma�num is currently exceeded because there are eight (8)
single-fam�lyuruts,ten (10).duplexes, and approximatelyei�htyeight (88) multi-familyuruts that
have access onto SW Lorruta Avenue. The adjustment w1l allow the applicant to increase that
number by one additional unit.
APPLICANT & Vasile Repta APPLICANT'S Campbell Planning&Development,Inc.
OWNER 11400 SW 90`�'nvenue REP.: Attn:Dou�Campbell
Tigard,OR 97223 3851 SW 50`�'Avenue
Portland,OR 97221
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
DESIGNATION: R 4.5;Low DensityResidential.
ZONE: R 4.5 Low Densi Residential. The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to. accommodate
detac e sing e- a �y omes with or without accessory residential units at a nununum lot size
of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are pern�itted conditionally.
Some civic and uistitutional uses are aLso pernlitted conditionally.
LOCATION: 11400 SW 90`�'Avenue;WGTM 1S135DA,T�Lot 2900.
PROPOSE D PARCE L 1: 15,447 Square Feet.
PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 10,448 Square Feet.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: Commuriiry Development Code Chapters 18.370 (Variances and Ad1'ustments ; 18.390
(Decision-1Vlakin Procedures�; 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning istricts);
18.705 (Access �gress and Cu-culation); 18J15 (Density Computations); 18J45 (Landscap ing
and Screenin�); 18.765 (Off-Street parking and Loading Requirements); 18.790 (T'ree
Removal)• 18795 (Visual Clearance Areas); and 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement
Standards�.
SE CI'ION II. DE CISION
Notice is hereby�iven that the City of T'igard Community Development Director's desi�nee has APPROVED the
above request sub�ect to certain conditions. The findin�s and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in
Section V.
NOTICE OF DEQSION MLI'2005-00005/REPTA PARTITTON PAGE 1 OF 20
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO SITE WORK:
e app icant s a �p repare a cover etter an su mit it, a ong wi any suppo�rting ocuments an or ans
that address the following re quirements to the PLANNING DIVISION, A'I'TN: CHERI'L CAINE�503-
639-4171. The cover letter shaIl clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found:
1. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval showing protection
specifications for the e�stmg hedge on the north side of the proposed access drive to Parcel2.
2. Prior to site work the applicant shall submit a revised site plan to the City Arborist for review and approval
showing the location of the required tree protecuon fencing (6-foot metal), tree protection s pecifications, and
tree protecuon zone dimensions to scale in accordance with the Project Arborist's repon. The plan shall be
signed by the Project Arborist.
3. Prior to site work,the applicant shall position fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to
be retained. The applicant shall position fencuig as directed by the project arbonst m his report dated May 5,
2008 to protect the trees to be retained. Fencuzg shall be 6-foot metal. The applicant shall allow access by the
City Arborist for the purpose of monitorin and uispection of the tree protection to verify that the tree
protection measures are perforniing adequate�y Failure to follow the plan or maultaui tree protection fencing
ui the designated locations shall be grounds for unmediate suspension o� work on the site until remediation
measures and/or civil citations can be processed.
4. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall prepare a proposal
detailing the coi�struction techniques to be empIoyed and the likely impacts to the uees. The proposal shall be
reviewed and approved by the Caty Arborist before proposed work can proceed within a tree protecuon zone.
The City Arbonst may requu-e changes prior to approval. The project arborist shall be on sne while work is
occunuig within the tree protection zone and submit a surrunary report cert�fying that the work occurred per
the proposal and will not significantly impact the health and/or stabihty of the trees. Tlus note shall be included
on the Tree Protection Plan.
5. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written
reports to the Caty Arborist, at least once every two weeks, as the Project Arborist monitors the construction
activities from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fenculg u�stallation through the building construction phases.
The reports shall evaluate the condrtion and location of the tree protecuon fencuig, deternzine �f any changes
occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree Protecnon Plan has been violated. If the amount of TPZ was
reduced then the Project Arbonst shall certify that the construction activities did not adversely impact the
overall, �ong-ter�n health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted to the Cary Arbonst at the
scheduled uitervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not beulg followed by the
contractor or a sub-contractor, the Caty can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the
City Arborist and the Project Arbonst.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
e app icant s a prepare a cover etter an su mit it, a on wi any supportin ocuments an orp ans
that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERI�G DIVISION,AT�: HIM MCMILLAN 503-
639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is
found:
6. Prior to commencin�g onsite imp rovements, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) ernzit is reguired for this
project to cover half-street and any other work in the public nght-of-way. Six �6) sets of detailed public
unprovement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineenng Department. NOTE: these plans are
in addition to any drawu�gs required by the Building Div�sion and should only include sheets reIevant to
pub �i�improvements. Public Faciliry Improvement (PFI� percrut plans shall conform to City of Tigard
1'ublic Improvement Design Standards, whtch are ava�lable at City Hall and the Cit�s web page
(www.tigard-or.gov).
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTTON PAGE 2 OF 20
7. The PFI pernut plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and tele�phone number of the
individual or corporate enuty who will be designated as the "Perniittee", and who wiIl provide the financial
assurance for the public unprovements. For examp le, sp ecify if the entity �s a corporation, limited
partnership, LLC, etc. Also specifY the state within wFuch the entity�s incorporated and provide the name
of the corporate contact person. Fa�lure to provide accurate inforniation to the Enguieenng Department
will delay processuig of pro�ect documents.
8. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City
Engineer. The purpose of tlus plan is for parking and traffic controI during the public unprovement
construcuon phase.
9. Prior to final plat approval,the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTAGT: Bethany Stewart,
Engineerin�.
10. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall plant street trees alon the fronta e of SW 90th Avenue and
along the frontage o} SW Lomita Avenue (�f there is space along the c�de-sac bulb�.
11. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Cpvenant whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future
improvements of SW 90th and SW Lomita Avenues adjacent to the subJect property,when anyof the following
events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the forn�ation of a
I,ocal Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part bythe
City or other public agency,
C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the
sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addiuon to
the su6ject property,or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in
conjunction with construction of improvements byothers adjacent to the subject site.
12. The applicant shall obtain a proval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection
prior to�ssuance of the Ca�Public Facility Improvement per-mit.
13. An erosion control plan shall be �rovided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) pern�it drawings.
The plan shall conform to the Erosion Prevention and Sediment �ontrol Design and Plaru�ing Manual,
February 2003 edition."
14. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coorciinates on two monuments with a tie to the Cit�s global
positioiung system (GPS) geodetic control network(GC 22) as recorded in Washington Counry survey records.
These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same prec�sion as requu-ed for the subdiv�sion
plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contaul the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be
established by:
. GPS tie networked to the Cit�s GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional stu-veying methods.
15. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) pa�per copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to
practice in Oregon and necessary data or narrative. . . .
B. Attach a check ui t�e amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact Planrung/Engineenng Pernut
Technicians,at (503) 639-4171,e�.2421).
G The final plat and data or narrauve shall be drawn to the minirnum standards set forth bythe Oregon
Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05) Washin on County,and bythe Catyof Tigard.
D. The right-of-waydedication for SW 9� Avenue,providing 27 feet from centerline,and for SW Lomita
Avenue,proviciing a 51-foot radit�s,shall be rr�de on the final plat.
E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive notice from
the Engineering Department indicating that the Ciry has reviewed the final plat and submitted
comments to the app I�cant's surveyor.
F. Af ter the City and�:ounty have reviewed the f inal plat,submit one pap er copy of the f inal plat f or City
Engineer signature (for partitions�, or City Engineer and Commuruty I�evelopment Director signatures
(for subdiv�sions).
NOTICE OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTION PAGE 3 OF 20
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
ie app icant s ia prepare a cover etter an su mit it, a ong wi any supporang ocuments an or ans
that address the folIowing requirements to the PLANNINCG DIVISION ATTN: CHERYL CAINE�503-
639-4171, EXT 2437. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the su�mittal the required information is
found:
16. Prior to issuance of a buildin pernut for Parcel2,the app licant shall su� pply building elevations, site plans and
a narrative showin� how t�e flag lot hei ht standards are met. Tlvs uicludes a 20-foot garage setback.
Requirements for tlag lots are outlined in�C 18.730.020.G Side yard setbacks for flag lots are typically 10
f eet.
17. Prior to building pemzit issuance, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval that
indicates the size, species, and location of street trees along 90`'' Avenue and Lomita Avenue }or the City
Arborist's review and approval. Spacing of such trees shall be in accordance with Section 18.745.040.G2.0 of
the Tigard Development Code. A note may be placed on the plan that states "slight variations in placement
may be required, but every effort will be made to keep the same net number of street trees that are shown
on the plan."
18. At the time of submittal for a building pernzit for the home on Parcel2, the applicant shall submit materials
demonstrating that one (1) off-street�parkuig space, which meets muumum dunensional requirements and
setback requu-ements as spec�fied in Titre 18,will be provided on-site for the new home.
19. Prior to issuance of building perniits, the applicant shall submit a building site plan to the building division
indicatin the locations of trees that were preserved on the lot during site development. In addition, the plans
shall inc�ude accurate locations of tree canopy driplines and protection fencuig, and a signature of approval
from the project arborist regarding the placement and construcnon techniques to be employed in build-ing the
structures. All proposed protection fencin shall be installed and ins�pected prior to commenculg construcnon.
The fencing shall remain in place throug� the duration of all of the building construction phases, until the
Certificate of Occupancyhas 6een approved.
The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporti�ng documents and/or plans
that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DIVISION,ATTN: HIM MCMILLAN 503-
639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall cleady identify where in the submittal the required information is
found:
20. Prior to issuance of building perniits,the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a paper copy
of the recorded f inal plat.
21. The CityEngineer maydetermine the necessityfor,and require submittal and approval of,a construction access
and parkuig plan for the home building hase. If the CatyEngineer deems such a plan necessary, the applicant
shall provide the plan pnor to issuance o�bwlduig pernuts.
22. Prior to issuance of buildin ernuts within the subdivision the Ciry En ineer shall deem the ublic
improvements substantially compplete. Substantial com letion s�iall be when: �) all utilities are installed and
u�spected for compliance, including franchise utilities, �) all local residential streets have at least one lift of
asphalt, 3) any off-site street and/or utility improvements are substantially completed, and 4) all street lights are
installed and ready to be energized.
23. The applicant shall either place the e�sting overhead utility lines along SW 90th Avenue underground as a part
of this project,or theyshall paythe fee in-heu of underg rounduig. The fee shall be calculated bythe frontage of
the site that �s parallel to the utility lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee opuon �s chosen, the
amount will be $4,525.50 and it shall be paid prior to issuance of building perrruts.
24. Durin�g issuance of the building pernut for Parcel2,the applicant shall pay the standard water qualiry and water
quantityfees per lot (fee amounts will be the latest approved byCWS).
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLP2008-00005/REPTA PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 20
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO FINAL BLJILDING INSPECTION:
e app icant s prepare a cover etter an su mit it, a ong wi any supportin ocuments an or ans
that address the followmg requirements to the PLANNING DIVISI(�N ATT� CHERl'L CAINE�503-
639-4171, EXT 2437. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the su�mittal the required information is
found:
25. Prior to final inspection for each lot, the applicant shall submit a final report bythe Project Arborist cenifying
the health of protected trees and that the street trees were properly�planted per the approved street tree plan.
Tree protection measures may be removed and final inspection authorized upon review and approval by the
City�rborist.
26. Prior to issuance final building inspection, the applicant/owner shall record deed restrictions to the effect that
any existing tree greater than 6" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a
cert�fied arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in
accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree.
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE
EFFEC'I'IVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION
OF THIS DECISION.
SE CTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site and Vicini Information
e .62 acre site is ocate on the east side of SW 90`'' Avenue, between SW Greenburg Road and SW North Dakota
Street. A small fla from the lot fronts onto SW Lomita Avenue, located to the east. The site �s zoned R 4.5 (Low
Density Residentia�, as are all surrounding properties. An e�sting residence sits near the 90�' Avenue frontage, and it
will remain on proposed Parcel 1. The e�sting residence is currently used as a senior care facility with five residents.
Homes in the area are su�gle-farruly and duplexes of varyuig ages. Some commercial and multi-farrulydevelopments are
found to the west along Pacific H'ighwayand Hall Boulevard.
Pro e H�sto .
A searc o Caty records shows only land use cases related to the minor land partition, no other approvals were found
affecting this parcel.
Pro osal Descri tion
e owner is proposing a two lot� partition. An existing home will remain on Parcel 1. A new single-family residence
will be constructed on 1'arcel2. The net square footage of the two parcels will be: Parcel 1 - 15,447 s qu�are feet and
Parcel2 - 10 448. The home on parcel 1 will mauitaui the ex�sting driveway to 90`� Avenue. Parcel2 wi11 be accessed
by a 15-foot�lag to Lomita Avenue.
SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
The T"igard CommuniryDevelopment Code re uires that propertyowners within 500 feet of the.subject site be notified
of the proposal, and be given an opportunity�or written conunents and/or oral testimonypnor to a decision beu�
made. In addition,staff has posted a notice on the site,visible from the street. Notice of apphcation was sent on July 3,
2008. A revised notice was sent on August 12, 2008 to include a required adjustment to the street improvement
standards to allow more than 20 wuts to access onto Lomita Avenue suice it ternunates with a cul-de-sac. No
comments were received during the original cor7unent period, but one letter was received during the second comment
period.
Ron Heitz stated that the site's existing residence appears to be utilized as an elderly care facility and not a single-f amily
residence. There are caretakers comuig and goulg aIl the tune and Tri-Met buses stop to pick up elderly ui front of the
home.
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTION PAGE 5 OF 20
Staff Response: After receiving the above comments, staff contacted the applicant's representative, Doug
Campbell, regarding the use of the existing home and the proposed use for Parcel 2. Mr.
Campbell was unaware of a seruor care facility, but spoke with the applicant, Vasile Repta,
about the uses. Mr. Repta verified that the exisung home on Parcel 1 �s used as a senior care
facility with five residents. Staff confirmed that the fac�lity is licensed by the Washington
County Department of Disability, u1g and Veteran Services for five residents. Group ltving
with five or fewer residents is pe�tt d outright within the R 4.5 zone; group living with six or
more residents is pernutted as a conditional use. Because the existing use has five residents, no
additional perrruttuzg or review is required.
SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIAAND FINDINGS
Variances and Adjustments (18.370�
Adjustments for street improvement requirements (Chapter 18.810). By means of a Type II procedure, as
governed by Section 18.39Q.040, the Director shall app rove, approve with conditions, or deny a rec�uest for an
adjushnent to the street improvement requirements, based on�indings that the following criterion is satisfied:
StrYCt application of the standards will result in an unacceptably adverse impact on e}ustin� development, on
the proposed development, or on natural features such as wedands, bodies of water, signiticant habitat areas,
steep slopes or exist�ng mature trees. In approving an adjustment to the standards, the Director shall
determine that the potent�al adverse impacts exceed the public benefits of strict application of the standards.
The ap licant is reguesting an adjustment to the street improvement re quirements. Code section 18.810.030.L states
that c�de-sacs shaIl not provide access to more than 20 dwelling uruts. Gurentlythere are more than 20 units. There
are 8 single-family units and approximately 10 duplexes that access SW Lomita Avenue (cul-de-sac). The Park Place
aparments with 88 units also have access onto Lorruta. The applicant notes that the apartment comp lex has two access
�oults and Lomita appears to be a secondary access. The apartment office is onented to and de&veries are received
rom SW 88�' Avenue. The code does not account for pnmary versus secondary accesses; therefore there are
appro�nately 116 units which have access onto Lomita Avenue.
The site being partitioned has frontage on SW 90`�' Avenue and a 15-foot flag that fronts on SW Lomita Avenue. The
site's fronta�e on Lorruta pre-exists the Lomita Terrace subdivision approved in 1962 as can be seen on the plat. The
only alternauve access pou�t to proposed Parcel 2 is from SW 90`�' Avenue along the north side of the existuig home.
The existing home is too close to the southern property line to provide access along that boundary. Locatin�the access
drive along the norhtern boundary would imp act numerous trees on-site and on the adjacent properry. Several trees
within the northern side yard of Parcel 1 wouId need to be removed and roots of trees on the ad�acent property would
also be affected. An existuig shed on Parcel 1 would need to be moved and the amount of usable yard area on the site
would be significantlydecreased.
Allowing the new residence access onto Lomita Avenue would have no adverse imp acts on the public. Lomita is a local
street with a 50 foot ROW. This local street section is a proved for less than 500 vpd. However, the a plicant and
future develo pers are re quired to dedicate ROW to the 5�foot sections which is a p proved for less than 1,�D0 vpd. In
this case the adverse unpact to the trees outweighs anybenefit to the public in reqwnng access to be from 90`''Avenue.
Land Partitions (18.420�
The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations;
The proposed partition complies or can be made to comp�ly with all statutory and ordinance requirements and
regulations as demonstrated by the analysis contained within this admuvstrative dec�sion and through the imposition of
conditions of development approval. All necessary conditions must be satisfied as part of the development and
building process. Theref ore,tfvs cntenon is met.
There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street & LTtility Improvement
Standards). Based on the analysis provided herein, Staff finds that adequate pubhc facilities are available to serve the
proposal. Therefore,this cntenon�s met.
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTION PAGE 6 OF 20
All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards;and
The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision under Chapter
18.8 r0 (Street &Utility Improvement Standards).. Improvements will be reviewed as part of the perniit process and
during construction, at which time the appropnate review authoriry will ensure that City and applicable agency
standards are met. Based on the analysis in this dec�sion,Staff finds that this critenon�s met.
All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning
district
The average nununum lot width required for the R 4.5 zoning district is 50 feet. Parcel# 1 is 129 feet wide as it fronts
SW 90�' Avenue. The other lot �s considered a flag lot, and front yards can be deternlined by the applicant. As
proposed the southern side will be the front yard. The nan-owest measurement of Parcel runnulg east to west is
approxunately 61 f eet. Theref ore,this standard h�as been met.
The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district In the case of a flag lot,the accessway may
not be included in the lot area.
The minunum lot area requirement in the R 4.5 zoning district is 7,500 square feet for detached
single-fam�ily�units. The proposed partiuon creates two (2) lots. Parcel l �s 15,447 square feet. A flag provides access to
Paxcel2. This access flag is not included m the site area for lot 2. The net areas of the three proposed parcel�s 10,448
square feet. This critenon has been met.
Each lot created through the paitition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a
legally recorded minimum 15-toot wide access easement
Parcel 1 has 129 feet of frontage along SW 90`�Avenue. The access flag for Parcel2 will have 19.84 feet of frontage on
SW Lomita Avenue after the dedication of nght-of-way. Tlvs criterion�s met.
Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district
Setbacks for the R 4.5 zoning district are as follows: front, 20 feet; side, 5 feet; street side, 15 feet; and rear 15 feet.
Because Parcel2 is considered a flag lot, the side�ya rd setbacks are increased to 10 feet. The setbacks for t�ie future
home on lot 2 will be reviewed at the time of buiiding perniit submittal. Setbacks for the e�sting home on Parcel 1
meet the re quirements• setbacks are discussed further under the Residential Zoning Districts section of this decision. A
condition o} ap�prova� under the Residential Zoning Districts section will ensure the applicant shows the correct
setbacks on the 6uilding site plans. This cnterion can be met conditionally.
When the pattitioned lot is a flag lot,the developer may deternune the location of the front yard, provided that
no side yard is less than 10 feet Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from
e�sting structures.
Parcel2 will be a flag lot, and any proposed structure must meet the 10-foot side yard setback standard. The ap licant
has noted that the south side will be the front yard on Parcel2. Flag lot requirements are discussed in more de�under
the Exceptions to Development Standards secnon of this report.
A screen shall be provided along the propeity line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is
located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be
required to maintain privacy for abumng lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed
development
An existing arborvitae hedge will be inaintained on the north side of the access drive to Parcel 2. A new hedge is
proposed along the southern property line.
The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a
detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities.
NOTICE OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTITTON PAGE 7 OF 20
The applicant states that a fire hydrant is located along SW 90`''Avenue. A fire flow test was done and is included with
the application. The hydrant provides ade uate flow as stated under the Additional Agency Concerns section of this
dec�sion. Tualatui Valley Fire and Rescue (�'VF&R) sent no comments or conditions regarding access or water supplies
for this project.
Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure
access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map.
No common driveways are proposed.
Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705,Access,Egress and Circulation.
This standard is addressed under Chapter 18.705 (Access,Egress and Carculation) later in this decision.
Where landfill and/or develo ment is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred year floodplain, the city
shall require consideration o�the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within
the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a
pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway
plan.
The partitioned lots are_approximately 1,015 feet to the south of the nearest 100-year floodplain. The elevation of the
floodplain is 163 feet,wh�le the site�s at 230 feet. Therefore,this standard does not apply.
An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with
Chapter 18.370,Variances and Adjustrnents. The applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustrnent(s)
will be processed concurrendy.
An ad�ustment to the street improvement standards is required because there are more than 20 units that have access
onto�e e�sting cul-de-sac. T�vs adjustment is discussed in further detail under the Variances and Adjusunents section
of this decision.
FINDING: The Land Partition standards are met.
Residential Zonin Districts�18.510�
Development stan�ards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below:
TABLE 18.510.2: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
STANDARD R-4.5 Parcell Par�e12
Mitumwn Lot Size
-Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft. 15,447 sq.fc. 10,448 sq.fc.[1]
-Duplexes
-Auached u�ut
Average Minimtun Lot Widd�
-Detached unit lots 50 ft. 129 ft. 61 ft.
-Duplex lots 90 ft.
-Attached unit lots
Maximum Lot Covera e - N/A N/A
Minimum Setbacks Can be met[2]
-Front yan3 20 ft. 24 ft.
-Side facing street on comer&through lots 15 ft N/A
-Side yacd 5 ft. 38 fc./9.5 ft.
-Rear yani 15 ft. 9 ft.[4]
-Side or cear yani abutting moce restrictive zoning district -- N/A
-Distance between ro line and front of ara e 20 ft 66 ft.
Maximwn Hei ht 30 ft 21 ft.[3] Can be mec
Mi�uiuucu Landsca Re uicemrnt - N/A N/A
[1]Net lot area that excludes access easemenu.
[2]Parcel 2 is a flag lot;therefore 10 foot side yarcl setbacks are required.
[3]Based on building permit(MST2003-00257).
[4] The existing deck on Parcel 1 pmjectc into the rear yard setback. Because the deck is 24 inches in height it is allowed within the setback by 18.730.OSO.D.
The main structure meets the standacd with a 16.5-foot setback.
NOTIC� OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTITTON PAGE 8 OF 20
A m�n;mum lot size of 7,500 square feet is reguired for each lot. The proposed lot sizes meet this standard.
Setbacks of the e�usting home are met for Parcel 1 as outlined above. The home is currently used for senior care
with five (5) residents. No special setbacks apply for this use, so the detached unit requu-ements apply. The
applicant states that the standards will be met on 1'arcel 2. Site and bwlding plans for Parcel 2 will be reviewed
through the building pernut process to ensure compliance with the R 4.5 zone and flag lot development standards,
including setbacks and height restrictions.
FINDING: Based on the analys is above, the Residential Zoning District Standards will be met pursuant to
the following conditions:
CONDI7TON: Prior to issuance of a building pernzit for Parcel 2, the applicant shall submit building
elevations, site plans and a narrative to the Planning Division showuzg how the flag lot
height standards are met. This includes a 20-foot garage setback Requirements for flag lots
are outluied in TDC 18.730.020.C. Side yard setbacks for flag lots are typically 10 feet.
Access,Egress and Ci�ulation(18.705�.
Continuing obligation of propeity owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in
this tide are cont�nuing requirements for the use of any structure or pa�el of real propeity in the City.
Joint Access. Owners of two or more uses, stn.ictures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize joindy the same
access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or�pa�els of land satisfies
the combined requirements as designated in this tide,provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented
in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the �oint use; and copies of the deeds,
easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City.
Joint access is not proposed with this development. Parcel 1 will continue to utilize the existing drive to 90`� Avenue
and Parcel2 will access onto Lomita Avenue.
Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N
Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall
connect direcdy with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at
the required standards on a continuous basis.
All proposed parceLs will have access to a public street. Parcel 1 has access onto 90`� Avenue. An access drive to
Lorruta�s proposed for Parcel2. Thi.s standard is met.
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals
which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stackin needs, sight distance
and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County,the City and AASH�O.
The applicant's engineer has indicated on the plans that the si ht distance from the existing driveway on SW 90th
Avenue �s 283 feet to the north and 500 feet to the south. � 90th Avenue is classified as a local street with a
maxiinum speed of 25 mph,which requires a minimum sight distance of 250 feet. Tlvs criterion is met. The proposed
driveway for the new lot will enter the cul-de-sac bulb ot SW Lomita Avenue. At the entry into the cul-de-sac, the
vehicle will not have on-corrung traffic at s� nificant speed with which to contend. Any traffic will be from other
driveways or vehicles turnuig around and �e travel speed will be minirr�l, therefore vehicles exiting the subject
propertywill have adequate sight distance and response tune to enter the cul-de-sac safely.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be perniitted to be placed in the influence area of
collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where gueues of traffic
commonly form on ap�proach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a coIIector or arterial
street intersection shaII be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat
of the roposed driveway. The setback may be greater dependin upon the influence area, as determined
from �ty Engineer review of a traffic imp act report submitted by�e applicant's traffic engineer. In a case
where a pro�ect has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the apphcant must explore any o�ption for shared
access with the ad jacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway sFiall be placed as
far from the inteisection as possible.
Tlvs property is not located on a collector or arterial street;therefore the standard does not apply.
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 20
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall
be 200 feet The minimum spacin�of drivewa�ys and streets along an artenal shall be 600 feet The minimum
spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 fee�
The property is not located on a collector or anerial and is not constructing a local street;therefore this standard does
not apply.
Minimum access requirements for r�esidential use. Table 18.705.1 states that the minimum vehicular access
and eg�ress for single-family dwelling units on individual lots shall be one, 10-foot paved driveway within a 15-
foot-wide accessway. The minimum access width for 3-6 dwelling units is 20 feet with 20 feet of pavement
The existing drive for Parcel l is 15 feet wide. A 15-foot access with 10-foot paved drive is proposed for Parcel 2. This
standard is met.
Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the
Uniform Fire Code.
Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with app roved provisions for the turning around
of fire apparatus by one of the following: a) A circular,paved surface having a rrunimum tum radius measured
from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b) A hammerhead-configured,paved surface with each leg of the
hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet; c) The ma�umum cross
slope of a required turnaround is 5°/o.
Only a private driveway onto SW Lomita Avenue is proposed to access Parcel2. The home on Parcel 1 will continue
to use the e�stulg dnveway to SW 90`�' Avenue. Pnvate access drives are not proposed for this partition. No
comments were received from Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue.
FINDING: The standards for Access,Egress,and Carculation are met.
Density Comnutations and Limitations (18J151:
Chapter 18.7 implements the Compre ensive Plan by establishing the criteria for dete�nining the number
of dwellin units permitted. The m.unber of allowable dwellin uiuts is based on the net deveiopment area.
The net area is the remaining parrel area after exclusion of e nsitive lands and land dedicated for public
roads or parks. The net area is then divided by the minimum lot size pemutted by the zoning district to
determine the number of dwelling units that may be developed on a site.
Based on the formulas in Chapter 18.715 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code, the maxiznum and
nununum number of uruts perrrutted on the site is based on the net developable area, subtracting sensitive land areas,
land dedicated to public parl�s, land dedicated for p�ublic ri�ht-of-way land}or Private streets or access drives, and lot
area for the e�cisting home from the total site area. The densityis calcu�ated as follows:
ross ite Area 26 786 s . t.
Ri t-o -Wa e ication on W 90 Avenue - 259 s . t.
Accessw�a an - 888 s . t.
L.ot or Ex�stui Home - 15 193s . t.
Net ite Area 10 446 s . t.
The resulting net area is 10,446 square feet. If this area is divided bythe ininimum lot size for the zone �7,500),then the
maximum number of additional lots perniitted on this site is 1 and the mu7unum number is 1. The app cant's proposal
to create 1 additional lot for a detached urut meets the maxunum and m;n,mum density requirements of the R 4.5 zone.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the Density Standards have been satisfied.
Exce�tions to Develo�ment Standards (18.730):
T�e maximum eight or an attac e or detached single-family, duplex, or multiple-family residential
structure on a flag lot or a lot having sole access from an accessway private drive or eas�ement is 1-1/2
stories or 25 feet, whichever is less, except that the maximum heig�it may be 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet,
whichever is less, provided:
a. The proposed dwelling otherwise complies with the applicable dimensional requirements of the
zoning district;
NOTTC� OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTI'ITON PAGE 10 OF 20
b. A 10 feet side yard will be preserved;
c. A residential structure on any abutting lot either is located 50 feet or more from the nearest point of
the subject dwelling, or the residential structure exceeds 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet in height on any
abutting lot; and
d. Windows 15 feet or more above grade shall not face dwelling unit windows or patios on any
abutting lot unless the proposal includes an agreement to plant trees capable of mit�gating direct
views, or that such trees exist and will be preserved.
The applicant shows 10-foot side yard setback on Parcel 2, but no specific building design is proposed. The
applicant states that residences to the east, west and south are within 50 feet of the proposed structure. Homes to
the east and south are 1-story. The home to the west is 2-story. Additional buffenng and screening will be planted
as necessary with the future structure. The applicant re quests that compliance with these requirements be reviewed
at the time of building permit. A condition of approval under the Residential Zoning Distnct section will ensure
these standards are met.
FINDING: Based on the information provided,staff cannot deterniine if the Exceptions criteria are met,
but can be met as conditioned previously with submittal of acceptable building and site
plans.
Landscaping and Screening�18.745�
Section 18.745.030.0 states that the installation of all landscaping shall be as follows:
1. All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures.
The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These �u t'delines follow
those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree plannng�guidelines as well as the standards set
fonh in the American Insutute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, lOth edition. In the Architectural
Graphic Standards there are guidelines,for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity.
Additionally,there are directions for soil amendments and modifications.
2. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the
Amencan Standards for Nurfierg Stock(ANSI Z-60, 1-1986,and any other future revisions);and
3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this tide.
Certificate of Occupancy. Cectificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscapin requirements
have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as �e posting of a
bond.
E�sting vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1) The developer shall provide methods
for the protection of existin� vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2) the plants to be
saved shall be noted on the randsca�pe plans (e. ., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing
which can be placed around the indvidual trees�.
Tree protection is addressed under the Tree Removal section of this decision.
Street trees: Section 18.745.040
Section 18.745.040.A.: All development projects frontin� on a pu� blic street, private street or a private driveway
more than 100 feet in length approved after the adopt�on of this tide shall be required to plant street trees in
accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040G
This proposed project has frontage along 90`�Avenue and on the proposed access drive to Lomita Avenue. Street trees
are reqwred along SW 90�' Avenue and alon SW Lomita, if there is space alon�the cul-de-sac bulb. All street trees
must be �lanted ui accordance with the stan�a�rds for size and spacing in this title, under Section 18.745.040.G The
applicant s site plan shows street trees along 90 Avenue, but no s�ze or species has been rop osed. The City Arborist
notes that there appears to be room f or three (3) large trees north of the dnveway and one�1) Iarge stature tree south of
the driveway. Street trees must be chosen from the approved City of Tigard street tree l�st.
NOTTC.E OF DEQSION MLP2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTION PAGE 11 OF 20
Bufferin�and Screening Requirements: Section 18.745.050.5
The propo�sed land partition occurs on a parcel surrounded by the same land use designation (R 4.5) as the subject
parcel. 'Therefore, no buffering or screerung pwsuant to Secuon 18.745.050.A is requu-ed for the proposed land
partition. However, as discussed under the Muior Land Partition section of this decision,pnvacy screerun$ �s required
pursuant to secnon 18.420.OSO.A.4.f. The applicant has hedges to meet this reqwrement. The Caty Arborist
recommends _protection of the e�usting hedge with 6-foot orange plast�c construcuon fencuig at a mmimum. The
applicant has been condiuoned to show protecuon spec�fications tor the hedge.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Landscaping standards have not been fully met. However, if
the applicant complies with the condition below the standards will be met.
CONDITTONS:
. Prior to building pernzit issuance, the applicant.shall submit a revised site plan for
review and approval that indicates the sizet species,.and location of street trees along
90�' Avenue and Lomita Avenue for the Caty Arbonst's review and ap�roval. Sp�acuig
of such trees shall be in accordance with Section 18.745.040.G2.C; of the Tigard
Development Code. A note may be placed on the��plan that states "slight vanations
in placement may be required, but every effort will be made to keep the same net
number of street trees that are shown on the plan."
. Prior to site work,the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval
showing protection spec�ficauons for the existing hedge on the nonh side of the
proposed access dnve to Parcel2.
Off-street Parking and LoadinQ Reauirements �18.765):
This Chapter is appli�or deve op�ro�ects when there is new construction, expansion of e�sting
use, or cFiange of use in accordance with Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking
Requirements.
The proposed partition will create one new lot for a single-family residence. Table 18.765.2 re qu�ires one (1) parking
space per room for group living uses. The existing residence has two off-street parking spaces within the garage and an
additional five (5� in the dnveway. .For the new detached dwellin Luut on Parcel2, one (1) off-street parkuig space
must be provide .. There is no max�rnum limit on parking allowed�or detached single-farrrily dwellings or group hving.
There is also no bicycle parking�requirement. To ensure that the new home constructed in this development complies
with these standards,the followuig condition shall apply:
CONDI`ITON: At the time of submittal for a building pernzit for the home on Parcel 2, the applicant shall
submit materials demonstrating that one (1� off-street parking space, which meets inulunum
dimensional requirements and setback requu-ements as specified ui Title 18, will be provided
on-site for the new home.
Tree Removal�18.790�
Chapter 18.790.030 requ�res the submittal of a tree plan that identifies the location size and species of all trees
on tI�e site a program to save existing trees over 1�-inch diameter at breast height(dbh) or mitigate for their
removal, ic�ent�ficat�on of trees to be removed and a protection program defining standards and methods that
will be used by the applicant to protect trees c�uring and after construction.
As required for partitions, the applicant submitted a tree plan conducted by Peter Torres, certified arborist. However,
the report does not contau�the four requu-ed components (see e�lanation below).
Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following:
1. Identification of the location, size and species of all e�sting trees including trees designated as
significant by the city;
The Arborist Report identified the location,size and species of all e�sting trees,consistent with this standard.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 20
2. Identification of a program to save e�usting trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper.
Mitigation must follow the replacement guidehnes of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the
following�standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for
landscaping, streets and parking lots:
a. Retention of less than 25% of e�ustin trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation
program in accordance with Section 18�90.060D of no net loss of trees;
b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existin�trees over 12 inches in caliper re uires that two-thirds
of the trees to be removed be mitigated m accorciance with Section r8J90.�60D;
c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existin�trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 pencent
of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section T8.790.060D;
d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation.
There are a total of four (4 viable, non-fnut trees on site �re�ater than 12 inches which are subject to mitigation (trees
68, 78, 80 &81). The app�cant states there are seven 7)• this number includes fruit trees. Fnut and orchard trees are
not sub�ect to rrutigation. The�applicant's tree remov�pian indicates the trees on the properry that are to rernain and
those proposed for removal. Ch�1y one of the four viable trees �s being removed. This represents a 75% retention rate;
theref ore no mitigation is required.
3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed;
All of the trees proposed to be removed are identified in the applicant's site plan(C3.2) and Arborist Report.
4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect
trees during and after construct�on.
This requirement has not been met. The fencing and tree protection specifications outlined in the arborist report need
be transferred accurately to the site plans. Six-foot metal fencing is proposed. The tree protection plan needs to
address tree protection standards and methods for after construcnon. Spec�fically, they need to address acceptable
landscaping�practices and materials around preserved trees. This additional inforniation can be provided on the site
plans as well.
Section 18.790.040 states that any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be
removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condit�on of
a� pproval for a conditional use, and shall notbe subject to removal under any other section of this chapter.
The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development pernut
affected by tlus section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous
according to a certified arborisL The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree
preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a haza�lous tree. The form of
this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director.
The applicant has proposed retaining trees on-site; removal of such trees is restricted. A condition of approval will
ensure that th�s standard�s met.
Additional Tree Plan Requirements as oudined in the Febniary 26,2008 Director's Interpretation.
A Director's Interpretation issued Febn►ary 26,2008 outlined tree plan requirements to be addressed by applicants.that
were in addition to those found under 18.79.030. The Director's Inte retation was ap�pealed to the Ci Council on
March 14,2008. Caty Council upheld the appeal on une 10,2008. The ap licant did ad�ress these reguirements within
their narrative,but these items are no longer require�and are not specific�y addressed within this dec�sion.
FINDING: Based on the analysis abovet the Tree Removal standards will be met, if the applicant
complies with the conditions listed below:
CONDITTONS:
Tree Protection
. Prior to site wor the applicant shall submit a revised site plan to the City Arborist for
review and approval showulg the location of the required tree protection fenculg (6-
foot metal),tree protecuon specifications, and tree protection zone dirriensions to scale
in accordance with the Pro�ect Arborist's report. The plan shall be signed by the
Project Arborist.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTTON PAGE 13 OF 20
. Prior to site work,the a�pplicant shall�position fencing a�s� directed by the project arborist
to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall position fencing as duected by
the project arborist in his report dated May 5, 2008 to protect the trees to be retained.
Fencing shall be 6-foot metal. The applicant shall allow access by the City Arborist for
the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protecuon to verify that the tree
protection measures are perfoxYnuig adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or mauitain
tree protection fencing ui the designated locations shall be rounds for irrunediate
suspension of work on the site until remediauon measures and�or civil citations can be
processed.
. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall
prepare a proposal detailing the construction techniques to be emp loyed and the likely
unpacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the Caty Arbor�st
before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone. The City Arborist
may requu-e changes prior to approval. The pro�ect arbonst shall be on site while work
�s occurrulg withui the tree protection zone and submit a sumrnaryreport certifying that
the work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly impact the health and/or
stability of the trees. Th�s note shall be included on the Tree Protection Plan.
. The applicant shall have an on-going_responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist
has submitted written reports to the �iry,Arborist,at least once everytwo weel�, as the
Project Arborist morutors the construcuon activities from initial tree�protection zone
('IT'Z) fencing installation through the building construction hases. The re�orts shall
evaluate the condition and location of the tree rotection �encing, deternune �f any
changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part o�the Tree Protection Plan has been
violated. If the amount of TPZ was reduced,then the Project Arborist shall certify that
the construction activities did not adversely unpact the overall, long-term health and
stabiliry of the tree(s). If the reports are not subrrutted to the Ciry Arborist at the
scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not
being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the City can stop work on the
pro�ect unt�l an u�specnon can be done by the City Arbonst and the Project Arbonst.
. Prior to issuance of building pernzits the applicant shall submit a building site plan to
the building� division indicatin the �ocations of trees that were preserved,on the lot
during site development. In a�dition, the plans shall include accurate locations of tree
canopy driplines and protection fencuig, and a signature of approval from the project
arbonst regardulg the pl�a�cement and construction techniques to be employed in
building the structures. All proposed protection.fencing�shall be installed and inspected
prior to commencing construction. The fencmg shall reinain in place through the
duration of all of the building construction phases, until the Certificate of Occupancy
has been approved.
. Prior to final inspection for each lot, the applicant shall submit a final report by the
Project Arborist certifyu�g the health of protected trees and that the street trees were
properly planted per the approved street tree plan. Tree protection measures may be
removed and fuial inspecuon authorized upon review and approval by the City
Arborist.
. Prior to issuance final building inspecuon, the applicant/owner shall record deed
restrictions to the effect that any e�sting tree reater than 6" diameter may be removed
only if the tree dies or is hazardous acco�mg to a certified arborist. The deed
restnction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in
accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree.
Visual Clearance Areas (18.795�
s pter.re uires�iat a c ear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to
intersecting ngh�-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area
shall contain no vehicie hed e lanting fence, wall structure, or �emporary or pennanent obstn.iction
exceedin three�3) feet in heig�t �he coc�e pro�ndes that obstructions that may be located in this area shall
be visual�y clear etween three (3) and eight(8) feet in height Trees may be placed within this area provided
that all branches below eight ($a feet are removed. A visual clearance area is the triangular area forrned by
measurin from the corner, 30-teet along the right-of-way and along the driveway and connecting these two
points wi�a straight line.
NOTIC� OF DEQSION MLP2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTION PAGE 14 OF 20
No e�sting or proposed structures are located within the visual clearance area. This standard has been satisfied.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the Vision C�earance Standards are met.
Impact Study(18.390�
Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with res�ect to each of the following criteria
when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application: '
Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of
development on public facilities and serv�ces. For each public facility system and type of impact, the
study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the
development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users.
In situations where the Community Develo�ment Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the
applicant shall either specifically concur wrth a requirement for public right-of-way dedicat�on, or.provide
e�ndence that supports that the real roperty dedication is not roughly propoitional to the projected impacts
of the develo ment Section 18.390.�40 states that when a condition of ap roval reyuires the transfer to the
public of an interest in real properiy,the approval authority shall adopt findings whicFi suppo�t the conclusion
that the interest in real propetty to be transferned is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed
development will have on the public.
The applicant has submitted an impact stu�dy. The home on Parcel 1 will continue to use e�vsting utility hook up s and
the ex�sting dnvewayto SW 90`�Avenue. The new home on Parcel2 will connect to existulg water,sarutary, andstorm
lines in Lorruta Avenue. No improvements are proposed for 90`�' Avenue or I.omita Avenue, but street trees will be
provided. Additional n�ght-of-way will be dedicated along both frontages to meet current standards. Parks system
development charges will be collected for the new home at building penrut�ssuance as well as traffic impact fees.
The Washin�ton Counry Traffic Impact Fee (ITF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development.
Based on Washington County figures .TIFs are expected to recapture 20 percent of the traffic impact of new
development on the Collector and Artenal Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TTF's of approximately
$3,390 (Effective July 1,2008) per new dwelling urut.
Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 20 percent of the impact on major street � rovements citywide, a fee
that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $16,950 ($3,390 divided by.2( . The difference between
the TTF paid, and the full imp act, is considered the urunitigatedunpact on the street system; therefore the unmitigated
impact of this project is $13,560 ($16,950 - $3,390). Both 90�' 3treet and Lomita Avenue are partiall�y improved;
therefore the apphcant is re�qwred to enter ulto future agreements for the rec�uired improvements. Dedication is
re uired along both streets. Two feet of dedication�s necessary along the SW 90 frontage and �s estimated at $775.80
(1�9.3 lineal teet x 2 ft x$3.00/square foot). The site aLso has trontage along SW Lomita Avenue,a local street. Fifteen
feet of.right-of-way dedication �s required to meet current standards for a cul-de-sac. Dedication along Lomita is
approxunately218 sguare feet and�s estunated at$654 (218 x$3.00/sq.ft). Total cost of dedication is $1,429.80,which
is Iess than the ururutigated impact of $13,560. Therefore the dedication is roughlyproportionate to the impact of the
proposed development.
PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS
Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810):
Chapter 18.810 provides constiuction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and
utilities such as streets, seweis,and drainage. The applicabie standarcls are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in
accorclance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing
street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/ftEPTA PARTTTION PAGE 15 OF 20
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Neighborhood Route (Local
Street to have a 54 foot ri�ht-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements req.uired may
inclu�e on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and
street trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW 90th Avenue,which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan
Map. At present, there �s approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's
map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from centerluie.
SW 90th Avenue is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development,the applicant
should plant street trees and enter uito a future streets improvement agreement for the remain�ng unprovements.
T1us site lies adjacent to SW Lomita Avenue, which is classified as a local street on the Ciry of T'igard Transportation
Plan Ma�. At present, there is approxur�ately 40 feet of ROW radius from centerline, according to the most recent tax
assessor s map. The standard requires the inuiunum curb radius within the bulb to be 40 feet. With the additional 11
feet for the curb,sidewalk and lanter strip the required ROW from centerline shall be a 51 foot radius. The applicant
should dedicate the additional�OW to provide 51 feet from centerline.
SW Lomita Avenue is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the
applicant should plant street trees and enter uito a future streeu unprovement agreement for the remauiing
improvements.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed
which shows the pattern of existing� and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land
division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or pernut a satisfactory future
division of ad'oining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a
barricade sha� be constructed at the end of the street These street stubs to adjoining properties are not
considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at suc-h time as the
adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constn.icted at the end of the street by the property
owners wluch shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer,the cost of which shall be included
in the street construction cost Tem orary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be
constructed for stub streets in excess o�150 feet in length.
The property is bounded on two sides by local streets and on the other two sides by existing residential development.
There are no opportwuties or needs for future streets or extensions of streets through this property.
Street Ali nment and Connections:
Section 1�.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between
connections is required except where prevented by barrie�s such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-
existing�developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restnchons e�sting prior to May 1
1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulatec�
water feature if regulations would not permit construction.
Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a
development site shall be extended within t�ie site to provide through circulation when not precluded by
environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other
standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or
reconfi�ure the street pattern to�rovide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained
if the slope is greater than 15/o for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or
topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection
is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection.
The properry is bounded on two sides by local streets and on the other two sides by existing residential development.
There are no oppomuuties or needs for future streets or e�ensions of streets through this properry.
Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.L states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access
to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints,
e�ust�ng development pattern, or strict adherence to other standa�ls in this code preclude street extension
and through ci�ulation:
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MI.P2008-00005/REPTA PARTITTON PAGE 16 OF 20
. All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than
circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer,and
. The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured from the centerline inte�section point of the two streets
to the radius point of the bulb,and
. If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be
required to be provided and dedicated to the City.
Slock Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with
due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for
converuent access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and
oppoitunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800
feet measured along the right-of-way line except
. Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wedands or other bodies of water or, pre-
e�sting development or,
. For blocks adjacent to arterial streets,limited access highways, major collectors or railroads.
. For non-residential blocks in which internal public ci�ulation provides equivalent access.
The site is located at the end of a cul-de-sac. E�sting homes are located where the street would be placed. These
parceLs are not large enough to be re-developed under the cwrent zoning. Due to e�stin development surrounding
the properry there are no possible street connections or opportunities to create shorter b�ock lengths that meet the
current standard.
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or n ht-of-
ways shall be provided when full street connection is notpossible. Spacing between connections sha�be no
more than 330 feet, exce�t where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, e�usting
development patterns,or stnct adherence to other standar�ls in the code.
Due to the placement of homes surrounding the property,a bicycle/pedestrian connection is not possible at this time.
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average
lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning distric�
Parcel 1 is less than 1.5 times the m;n;mum lot size 7,500 x 1.5 = 11,250). Parcel 1 is 15,447 square feet. The average
lot width Parcel 1 is 129 feet,so 2.5 x 129 =322.5. �arcel 1 is 136 feet at the deepest point. This standard is met.
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of fronta�e on public or private
streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c ap lies, wluch requires a parcel to
either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide reco�ed access easement In cases
where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit,the frontage shall be at least 15 feet
Parcel 1 has 129 feet of street frontage along SW 90th Avenue. Parcel 2 has 19 feet of frontage on Lomita Avenue
through an access flag.
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be
located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets
shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant shall enter into a future street improvement agreement for SW 90th and SW I.omita Avenues,which will
include public sidewall�s,thereby meeting this cntenon.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewets Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new
develo ment and to connect developments to e}cistin mains m accordance with the provisions set forth in
Design and Construction Standards}or Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by C1ean Water
Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted pohcies of the
comprehensive plan.
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional
development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan.
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTION PAGE 17 OF 20
There is a public sewer line located in SW 90th Avenue and a lateral that serves the e�vsting home. There is a public
sewer line in SW Lomita Avenue that temiinates at a inariliole. The applicant's plans show a lateral extension from the
manhole to serve the proposed parcel.
Storm Draina�e:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm
water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility
shall be large enou h to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area,whether inside
or outside the deve�opment The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility based on the
pro� visions of Design and Constn.iction Standards for Samtary and Surface Water Management�as adopted by
C1ean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer
that the additional runoff resulti�ng from the development will ovedoad an exist�ng drainage facility, the
Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of tIle development until provisions have been made for
improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional tunoff
caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and
Surface Water Management(as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
In 1997, C�ean Water Services (C,'WS) completed a basin study of Fanno C�eek and adopted the Fanno Creek
Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendaaon that local governments institute a
stormwater detention/effective unp etvious area reduction pro ram resulting in no net increase m storm peak flows up
to the 25-year event.. The Ciry w�11 require that all new deve�opments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces
provide onsite detention facilities, unless the develo�pment is located adjacent to Fanno Creek For those developments
adjacent to Fanno Creek,the storm water n,uioff wiIl be perniitted to d�scharge without detention.
The G1X/S standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land�partitions. It would
be impractical to require an on-site water quantity facility to accommodate the storm water from ISarcel2. Rather,the
G�XJS standards provide that applicants should pay a fee u1-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff
recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication,
lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed under�round, except for surface
mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets wliich may be placed above
ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operabng at 50,000
volts or above,and:
. The developer shall make all necessaiy arrangements with the serving utility to provide the
underg round setvices;
. The C'ity reserves the ri�ht to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
. All underground utilit�es, incIuding sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the
developer,shall be constnicted pnor to the surfacing of the streets;and
. Stubs for service connections sFiall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when
service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-
lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing
utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority detemunes that the
cost and technical difficulty of under-groundin� the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in
conjunction with the developmen� The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common,
but not the only such situat�on is a short frontage development for which under- rounding would result in
the placement ot�additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities�acilities. An applicant for
a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public
right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding.
NOTICE OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTTTTON PAGE 18 OF 20
There are e�stin overhead utiliry lines along the fronta e of SW Fonner Street north side).� If the fee in-lieu is
proposed,it is e qugal to$35.00 per lineal foot of street fron age that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this
site�s 129.3 lineal feet;therefore the fee would be $4,525.50.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY
IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS:
Fire and Life Safe .
The applicant as submitted a Fire Hydrant Flow Test Report dated 4/22/2008 provided b�y Tualatin Valley Water
Distnct. The repon indicates that flow at 20 psi residual pressure (calculated) is 1086gp m The hydrant is located at
the northwest corner of the subject property withui the SW 90th Avenue ROW TVF&R requ.ires a mm�mum of 1000
gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. Tlvs hydrant provides adequate flow.
Public Water S stem:
Tualatin V �e�y U�ater District ('I'VWD) p�rovides service in tlus area. The applicant must submit plans for review and
approval to"I'VWL)prior to issuance of Caty of Tigard pernuts.
Storm Water Qualit�:
The City has a reed to enfotre Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Gean Water
Services (CWS�Design and Consttuction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which
require the construct�on of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be desi ned to remove 65
percent of the phosphotus contained in 100 pe�ent of the storm water ninoff�enerated�rom newly created
impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and
method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partitions. It would
be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from Parcel 2.
Rather, the CWS standards provide that appIicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed
appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on th�s application.
Gradin and Erosion Control:
CWS Desi n an Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and
other po�utants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development,
construct�on, grading, excavat�ng, clearing, and any other activity wluch accelerates erosion. Per CWS
regulations the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to
issuance of'City permits.
The applicant shall submit an Erosion Control plan for review and approval with the PFI Permit application.
Address Assi nments:
e Ciry o Tigar is responsible for assignin addresses fo� r�parcels within the City of T'igard. An addressing fee in the
amount of$50.00 per address shall be assesse�. T�us fee shall be paid to the Catyprior to}uial plat approval.
Surve Re uirements•
The applicant's in p at shall contain State Plane Coordinates AD 83 91)] on two monuments with a tie to the
Cit�s global positiorung system (GPS) geodetic control network�GC 22). �ese monuments shall be on the same line
and shall be of the same prec�sion as requu-ed for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat
shall contain the scale factor to convert round measurements to gnd measurements and the angle from north to grid
north. These coordinates can be establis�ed by.
. GPS tie networked to the Cit�s GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveyu�g methods.
In ad�tion, the applicant's as-built Prawin�s shall be tied to t(he GPS network. The applicant's eng'meer shall provide
the G with an electronic file with ouits or each structure manholes, catch basins,water valves, hydrants and other
water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD
83 (91).
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTITION PAGE 19 OF 20
SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
The Cit}�s Building Division reviewed the proposal and had no objections.
The City of Tigard Public Works Department and Tigard Police were also sent copies of the proposal. No
comments were subtrutted to the Plannuig Division.
SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS
Clean Water Services has reviewed the prop osal. The plan was reviewed b�y C1ean Water Services. A sewer
connection pernut has been issued. A copyof the perrrut is found in the land use fiie (MI.P2008-00005).
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was sent a copyof the proposal,but no comments were received.
SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice: Notice was mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owner of record within the required distance
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 29,2008 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 16,2008 LJNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
�A- pea-l:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise
adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in
accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written
a eal to�gether with the re_quired fee shall be filed with the Director witlun ten(10) business days of the date the Notice
o��ecision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and fornis are available from the Plaruung Div�sion of T'igard City
Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,TI'�igard,Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the
specific issues ident�fied in the wntten comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional
evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be subrrutted by any party during the appeal
hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that maybe adopted f rom time to tune by the appel[ate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 15,2008.
I�estions:
e any questions, please call the City of T'igard Plaruling Division,T'igarci City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,
Tigand,Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
Q- ��-"�-J Au t 28 2008
PREPARED . e Caines ATE
Associate Planner
y
� l 'e—• �; August 28,2008
APPROV`ED BY: Ric ar Bewers DATE
Planriuig Mana e
NO7TC�OF DEQSION MLI'2008-00005/REPTA PARTI7TON PAGE 20 OF 20
� _ .
I� 1 , � . - .
� �_ 2 r ��EOGRAPNiC iN�pRMAlI�1N SVSiEM
\ r
� VICINITY MAP
w
> -- - - - - - - - - - - _ _
� �- MLP2008-00005
- >w ti�
- - - - - - - - - -
, Q � - - - - - - - - - -
� REPTA
� � � �
� � >> , PARTITION
,
�
�
DAKOTA ST -- _ _-_ . I
—�
� H
U W
, H r
� �
W r � �
I
� Q �_- , � � � LEGENI�:
- - j SUBJECT
-- > / SITE
Q , /
j �
d
; FcRR
F�� � ;:
2 . _ S, ,;�<
� %��/ ' ' w -
rn � —� _, ' �. _ . �� �
GRE��e Q — -� ' � _ �_��„�o� ��_ ��= �r_--�
, �
� — a �eonrcn
RG — Q . �i I
� . eeflo�HOao�'�.��� ooaHqyt_,. Igo �' �
z � ; ��-
�-- � � _
� � = Tigard Area Map
i r �
�O °� D ♦
o,`�' LOMITA r N
. � � �� 0 100 200 300 a00 500 Feet
_- � . � 1 � �� ..
� t"=987(eet
TANGELA �' � / "
— �N � , � � � �
� o � � �
T^A��C�^ ^t W w Information on this map is for general Iceation only and
/'11 V L !1 L� � �' should be verified vnth Ihe Development Services Division.
_ _ Q Q �
13125 SW Hall Blvd
. , �_ v � � � � � Tiqard.OR 97223 �
� � � . � --- --� ' � (5031639�177
� - http:1/www.ci.ligard.or.us
Community Development Plot date:Jul 1,2008;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
� , �,���. ,� �.,_.
I – — , -
�
: �����
� � '� �\
. ___»La�?ts ---k't'-- --as�i'
� nr
__... _.�. .. . !
� ,
..._.._ih}- 'r .
� �. � �� V' 7. .
� ,�.._ _.— — — — _'_'—.f�� — _ — — _i��� y� ; 7�'a � �r1�' f INMeWY ;
� � � � t i n <? i "U�, r^ � Z,si._-,:w� � .f-o^y 1
� � �� . � 1� — —�—b -- —'—
, 1 I � .. ,L�.�,.!";� . -'. `t�' � i, dnMasm
. I . i <G �� ''+` Y�� :�" >�` c .`' m a�w � r� -� -� I gTE
�-.� M "'f 4��L 2at�' �(� �I �� � 1
I� I ��.,?.. '� ti,,. � � I '�l�'2� 1
� .j
� � ,r�. %z ..
„ < ! ,v:,.,� � —� �
I I '� � �`'�,-�`'i ,� I p ,
n__n -� `�!/, l � t- ._ � �..:
� �
,s ,�. � �._.„ 3,;�.s 1 � , I `'f
� l i . , ,_r � i �� i+w� _ J � � I ����ry�''
� �,'� �
'" , � ; � __._..... r I �ti
� -_
� � --. . _....__ —!.. _�--- ' . S
{ � "�ii I I � � J:��r I i� ......� �
� �
� t � /�l'w�v'� I I ___ _ _.._ _-- —� i � � <l�},>'°L �
i. ,_ b a' I t' •- I I , i�.k,;i vx�r�rr w�r
, t
'- i .� - � .t I 1�� i __�,y� 1 � ,����` � n
� i �� S� , ! � �s"'°' � -.,.�� i
�� i PMCEL 1 , . i ,�.. �c�''�S �;j
� . �. �. � �`-� �. ,4.a. � � �,._._ � _ P„0.CEL� ,�. .y �
I � � � I
� .. _ . . ___._..�_. \ •� ' . � �--y _._____ .. _�, c :_� �o,+af �Z�'�ry`ir, I
__
� ,�� ; .., �)�s -
�. ' �� w�na wrs � � I ' ... �.� �
' � „�°r-. � � n ouw T- � �•
' i
�.�a ✓' �j
� I� ` � � � � � !11.� ! I __ I
I �� � `. ...���. � I � i e�Jr,,.� r',`` �tC=1�MS� ...__._ — __ I ,
• \ 'N�
�,i I N
� �� , � ,� �� :-�-,; ,,-._ ____; I i _�r� � `����� ��.�,� �� �! �
b �� s � ! ` _ __
� � � : ...�,,, �_ lv� .. �'�.(i_� � L I' I I
'I
IAD�pLV�lli]RO
>.I '`� { 7 r..��,� / � I I � �.
I /l �,�
_'"' } _ __ ' I. ..__�-..___L_..a__._.......__._...."'_� �...._...._.I._.. \ /`�-���c.; �
l � ______ ..t �
�. , �
� i � �
�� � ; � I i � i � I
_ ,-� -Il
�\ i !r � �J i 4_
� �. , p� �ii I P � � � �'�Lr:,,� � i °� o� '.
� I I 1 o�nw anar� I ,. �i 'I L . � _ �`I II ! i � � .
' � � ', _� _ __--L- _` -�— _ • `4-- --_ _ , _ __��
._ �
_- -
� . _ ,�-�s� � � -�------------- ------- - ,r ,_.
I • ........_..._._�..J �� . . . r.-YS.. _. _ '
I � ..... l r'{ - _.
�
I.''� i i � _ I ��✓..� ,L,r�J; ` \� �A�1'O�eT�.. �• ���1
i . -- - ...__-_ ..__.. ..— --- — —�-- � ,i �� � . — ._.._ i� ewrwr
��
� � — — ,� `�`-rr �- s� i � �� �---� — -----�--- -- ��}�i'"r`� -
. I � ��������� ������� ���� mnoraa ___._.._ ......... �.
i ,�'llt�-� 1Q/.w � .._,� u_�� �-�s�� :�,�E �/.
,, I ' _ _ _ __.. _ \ 4� �..ko ■i .-'
I : i -- s�, ..1�..b'�. i.. ..I �'/ I
� I r j j�,�„r A
, � - �.ow�f �\.,, .
O�«�.� 1EC�n I \`i� �� � _`.
�IQ�A II�M MO�A a1M
R niam m oow '`� `I � r
�t na�o�r�u�c u Q,.�� afeen imr mc � t
oasnw�nMOUS�-e.s»ar 8 nm,o r aam "101¢"01""`" �—"�*•�°�7° 1 �, 5� � �
IEM N�FFANWS A1EA�J.Y79�F O CO�AR.T 10�ATINLT�IRwY �-�` _____1�?0�lIOY OIMI � � ��'"
N NQI
aa[m uIIN lo�P�O f11RT J.�.�„��`
� �
: �
O!'Mf tMffMR�l'�Q UlO1K !�.� ----IOGO WRMY!7t I
W�lCT A I�IM WWRL 1�"�.S�l� I�IQO�M161�IMQ \ �?
\•. .� �a�Gl IIOOf IDI lIIOI�IYI��I�1 �
O 1'M�a1Q TM OI Oi1M01W1 �`-��r�I IR f/L WBVL N 1AEIR iBIR Iq�!Of Ol1M1O1 ....�_..... \ '.
��._.�_._ �NrNI�/f M1O I�la Mi 1'aHQ{![ ' !. I .
Q MRML/Y�el G701 WM 7REE PROlEC110N 4,���•. ��1 .
!�IIV�L APPRO�IAL^ -- o�:��.,,,.o. —�"--� �.��, ,�,�...o.. ; 1 ;i �
� T c � �os..e�...e i j .
C1.Y J� 1'IGAf�D PL{�►,t�iNM�tC3 QI1►ISNnId � �„r,��,„v,,,., �
, �wmw oe..w�an..K s.,.e rtEPrA s1E e/to/06
�w�rr�
�rwn no�r t�ra mr nreww VASIIE RFPfA w��in
p�, ��^ O� r a s�wo no�oaw�nQr nQ +� �T ENGINEERING.INC. �����m� �
, g�!C .C'���,Y�_ t�ATE � , �..r��.�o�,...�.�.�.� ,�,�.�, nawo.or+�ooN oriv
� — --- .. ... ,.
p�,��.,�.�.�e �.�
..���. .u, e .� ._�...`.��. _��.�� �.� —._ _. 10 t�@�Al mi1�ICCY1 � �a soa 7�s w�
� m:�� s�� P�w/P,�nnaa
Vasile &Lidia Repta
11400 SW 90`" Avenue MLP2008-00005 �y�B I
Tigard, OR 97223 REPTAPARTITION
Campbell Planning&Development,Inc.
Attn: Doug Campbell
3851 SW 50`''Avenue
Portland, OR 97221
Ron Heitz
11401 SW 90`h
Tigard, OR 97223
k
�
i
i
P
G•
�
PR&APP.HEID BY
� �
i CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION
! : �� LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATI�N �r�; �;�,-� _
}, �Q„ .
City of Tigarr�Perrrut Cerner 13125 S W Hall Blzcl, Ti�n� OR 97223 =�,.�.
Phon� 503.639.4171 Fax:503.598.1960 1 �� �;��,�
File�l (,t��f f�p-�}-a b Other Case tl
Date S I S b� By, `> ��'�" �ceipt# ��'D���O�°� Fee 3'���� `'�� Date Complete � a�
TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR
❑ Adjustment/Variance (I or II) �Minor Land Partition(II) ❑ Zone Change (III)
❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(I� ❑ Planned Development(III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation(I�
❑ Conditional Use(III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review(I,II or III) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment(I�
❑ Hutoric Overlay(II or III) ❑ Site Development Review(II)
❑ Home Occupauon(II) ❑ Subdi��ision(II or III)
L N A ress av e
ll y�� C✓� °�'4 � /��/�itiGC �
&
�S 2 3 S ,D�f �9'�
, ��2 �,�es R- y. s
AI'PLI qM'"
v�s�/� Q�� T� ;
N A
� �
�/yo 0 5 c� �o �' A�v�e.�u e
5o3-6Zd -�SSS
RIMARI' N A PE ON
Dccx.�� ������/� c p a/J �0 3 -�.��-y�iy�
PR PERTY OuNER DEED H LDER Aaac [ more ooe
li� 5�l-r Q� T4
. A I
��yoo S c,� qo� ,QvP�u-r j� ar� oR 971 � 3
''When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession cvith written
authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form
or submit a�ritten authorization with this a lication.
RO AL S[I;vA,1ARY(P ease e spec�ic)
Gv � T T�v�-
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS
DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQLTIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET.
i:\curpin\masters\land use applications\land use pem-ut app.doc
THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
♦ If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance a7th the tern�s and
subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval.
♦ All the above statemenu and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and e�ibits transmitted herewith, are
true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any pernut issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is
found that anysuch statements are false.
♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria, and understands
the requirements for approving or denying the application(s).
SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED.
�.� �,/� -o�
Owne�'s Signature Date
d�� �� � �- /�3 - ���
Owne�'s Signature Date
Owne�'s Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
G f �—/''3—O F�
App ican Agent/Rep sentative's Signa re Date
Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date
�
Y
° LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
. � .
120 DAYS = 10/11/2008
FILE NO.: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2008-00005
FILE TITLE: REPTA PARTITION
APPLICANT/ APPLICANT'S
OWNER: Vasile & Lidia Repta �,P: Campbell Planning & Development, Inc.
11400 SW 90 Avenue Attn: Dou Campbell
Tigard, OR 97223 3851 SW 50�' Avenue
Portland, OR 97221
REQUEST: The applicant is requestin approval to Partition one 25,879-square foot (0.62-acre) lot into
two lots of 15,477 square �eet and 10,448 sc�uare feet. The applicant proposes to retain the
existing single-family home on Lot 1 and build a new single-family detached home on Lot 2.
Proposed Lot 2 will be a flag lot.
LOCATION: 11400 SW 90`'' Avenue; Washington County Tax Map 1S135DA, Tax Lot 2900.
ZONE: R-4.5: Low Densi Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate
detac��in�g -�i y omes wi� or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot
size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted
conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Cha ters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.81�.
DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I � TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV
COMMENTS WERE SENT: JUI.Y 3, 2008 COMMENTS ARE DLJE: JUI.Y 17,2008
[HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM
[PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM
[CITY COUNCIL (T'UES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM
�STAFF DECISION (T'ENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: JULY 28, 2008
COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
VICINITY MAP � UTILITY PLANS � SITE DISTANCE CERTIF.
�SITE PLAN � SERVICE PROVIDER LTR. � IMPACT STUDY
�NARRATIVE � TREE PLAN � OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS
STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines, Associat�e Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 2437
�
��CP&D
CAMPBELL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC.
March 24, 2008
Emily Eng
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: Repta Partition
Dear Ms. Eng;
On behalf of Vasile Repta we are submitting this application for a Type II review for a Minor
Land Partition for 21ots. The applicant has chosen not to pursue a conditional use for a
duplex as previously discussed, so no neighborhood meeting was required and just the
applicable sections of the development code for a Minor Land Partition has been addressed in
this application. We look forward to discussing the review of this application with you.
Please let me no if there are any additional items needed that may expedite your review in a
timely fashion.
Sincerely,
�
Douglas Campbell, A.LC.P.
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc
3851 SW 50`�Avenue; Portland,OR 97221 �Phone: 503-229-4449�Fax: 503-297-3537
., . —
�
Repta Partition
Com leteness Item Met Not Met N/A Comments
18.745.030: X* -The applicant did not address these r��k �+�*^"'`
General Provisions provisions in their narrative.
-The applicant is proposing to retain the p���
existing arborvitae hedge to the north of � ��
the driveway, but they have not
proposed a protection method for it. I
recommend they protect the existing
hedge with 6' orange plastic
construction fencing at a minimum.
Please have the applicant show
protection specifications for the hedge in
their plan set.
18.745.040: X* -Please have applicant propose street ��-���
Street Trees tree species and locations in the plan set -----
that meet the requirements of TDC
section 18.745.040. There appears to be
room for 3 large stature trees to the
north of the driveway, and 1 large
stature tree to the south of driveway.
18.745.050: X* -The driveway may be more than 100' in
Buffering and length. If so,then street trees are
Screenin re uired alon drivewa .
18.745.060: X Not addressed in narrative.
Re-ve etation
18.790.030: X -I did not s t irector's
Tree Plan Interpretatio ecifically addressed in f�'�(r�
Requirement the arboris
-The fencing and tree protection ' � ;.��I D►�
specifications in the arborist report need- --
be transferred accurately to the site plans
(to scale) and include a signature of
approval from the project arborist.
Specifically, the tree protection
specifications, zone dimensions and
fencing type recommended by the
project arborist is not reflected on the
site plans.
-It is unclear whether tree number 88 is v�m� (Y+r �I�^^
being removed or retained. If it to
remain and be used as a street tree, they
need to apply for an adjustment
(18.370.020.C.6).
Todd Prager
City Arborist
Apri129, 2008
�
-Need to address tree protection � �,�� P�
standards and methods for after
construction. Specifically, they need to
address acceptable landscaping practices
and materials around preserved trees.
After construction specifications should
be included on the tree rotection lan.
18.790.050: X
Permit Applicability
Todd Prager
City Arborist
April 29, 2008
�
LAND USE APPLIC ION Project:_ n'���o�� - ��o�
� Date: �l� �. 1 � ;-x,�
—�7
COMPLETENESS REVIEW ❑ COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE
STANDARD INFORMATION:
Deed/TitlelProof of Ownership ❑ � , , endees� Im�par.LStudy(18.390)
USA Service Provider Letter ❑ � te �Envelopes with Postage(Verify Ca
#Sets Of Application MaterialslPlans-"Paper Copies" re-
❑ #Sets Of Application MaterialslPlans-"CD's"
PROJECT STATISTICS:
� Building Footprint Size ❑ ite ❑ ��ecuit�u�-�uCf�c�.�ite
Lot Square Footage
PLANS DIMENSIONED:
❑ "��t � clude Accessible 8 Bike Parkin� TfUCl4-�A IICB IA
❑ � Access Approach and Aisie `u Visual Clearance Trian le S
ADDITIONAL PLANS:
` ( GM,�(1�f�vr--
� Vicinity Map � Tree Inventory
Existing Conditions Plan Q n
[�-- Site Plan
TREE PLAN 1 MITIGATION PLAN:
_ l h wvt.#�y �. /1�,�l-.
�" Y�.f/V1UUCr�
ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) — ���� ��s (��
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS:
❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 1$.775(Sensitive Lands Review)
❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) ,�] 18J05(Access/Egress/Circula6on) � ❑ 18.780(Signs)
❑ 18.350(Planned Devebpment) ❑ 18.71�(Accessory Residen6al Units) ❑ 1$.785(Temporary Use Permits)
❑ 18.360(Site Devebpment Review) � 18.715(Density Computations)/ � 18.790(Tree Removal) �
❑ 18.370(Variances/AdjusUnents) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility 5tandards) ❑ 18.795(Visual Ciearance Areas)
❑ 18.38�(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.725(Environme rtnance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities)
❑ 18.390(Decision Making Proceduresllmpact Study) �(ExcePtions To Develooment Sfan a � ❑ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards)�'
18.41 O(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Over�ay)
15.420(Land PaRitions) i Q __'IS_742-(Home Oce�pation Pertnits)
18.430(Subdivisions) �!�_ 18.745(Landscapino&Screening Standards�-�
� 18.510 Residential Zonin Districts pc � �`���
( 9 � ❑ 18.75�(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regula6ons) 1 '�
18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage)
❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations)
❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) �, 18.765(Off-Street Parking/�oading Requirements)/
ADDITIONAL ITEMS:
-w T
G�' �
IP�l � � I�M �n( � �C-�l �(r
I:lcurpinlmasterslforms-revisedlland use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 6-Jun-07
�
City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223
june G, 20U8 ��
�
�
lloug Campbell
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. �:�;����;,�
3851 SW 50`" Avenue �
Portland, OR 97221
RE: Completeness Review- Repta Partition
Case File No. MLP2008-00005
Dear poug:
1'he Ciry has received your applicauon for Minor Land Partition (MLP2007-00005) to divide
one lot into two at 11400 SW 90�'Avenue. Staff has determined the materials to be
substantively complete, subject to the following changes:
• Fngineering items: label centerline; show e�sting and proposed ROW dimensions;
• Include responses to 18.745 (page 7 of narrative is missing).
• Address 18.730 and the criteria in the Director's Tree Code Interpretation (18.790).
• Clarify whether Tree 88 (in RO� is being removed or retained. If retaining, apply
for adjustmcnt to landscaping standards to use Trcc 88 as a strcct trcc (Scc
18.370.020.C.6). Fee is $154.50 (half of standard fee).
Please include the above changes in all copies of your complete application packet. The
additional copies below are required for your application to be deemed complete:
• Seven (7) copies of the complete application, including full-size plans.
• Six (6) copies of reduced plans only.
• 'Two sets of business size envelopes with address labels and first-class stamps affixed
(no return address).
1'he review process will begin upon completeness and takes an average of 6 weeks. Please
be aware that staff has not reviewed the application for compliance with the code and may
request additional items during the review period.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (503) 718-2712. Thank you.
Sincerely,
�.- �
��� `
Emily g
Assistant Planner
Enclosure: Public Facility Plan Checklist
Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772
�
PUBLIC FAClLlTY PLAN Project: , __,ota MLP
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 6/6/08
GRADING
� Existin and ro osed contours shown.
❑ Are there radin im acts on ad�acent arcels?
❑ Ad�acent arcel rades shown.
❑ Geotech stud submitted?
STREETISSUES
� Ri ht-of-wa clearl shown.
❑ Centerline of street s clearl shown. Label centerline
� Street name s shown.
� Existin / ro osed curb or ed e of avement shown.
❑ Street rofiles shown.
❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo
on ad�acent arcel s , etc.
❑ Traffic Im act and/or Access Re ort
❑ Street rades com liant?
❑ StreeUROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? Show existing and proposed ROW
dimensions
❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width
a ro riate?
❑ Other:
SANITARY SEWER ISSUES
� Existin / ro osed lines shown.
❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? �
WATER ISSUES
� Existin / ro osed lines w/sizes noted?
� Existin / ro osed fire h drants shown?
� Pro osed meter location and size shown?
❑ Pro osed fire rotection s stem shown?
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES
� Existin / ro osed lines shown?
❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention
rovided?
❑ Water ualit /detention facilit shown on lans?
❑ Area for facilit match re uirements from calcs?
❑ Facilit shown outside an wetland buffer?
❑ Storm stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown?
The submittal is hereby deemed � COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE
By: Date: 6/608
REVISED: 06/06/08
�
��CP�D
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. ������-i � ,;( �
!.J
JUN 1 2 2008
lune 10, 2008 LITY�F i IGAflD
�'�A��I�P�1P���qf�
Emily Eng
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: Repta Partition-Completeness Review
Case File No. MLP2008-00005
Dear Ms. Eng;
Provided for your review is an updated site plan that addresses the centerline and ROW
dimensions and showing the removal of tree number 88 along the property's frontage on SW
90th Avenue. A new tree will be provided to replace the tree at time of site improvements
and the tree type, size and final location will be shown on the final site improvement plans.
The revised narrative further addresses Section 18.745 which was missing from the
application. Sections 18.730 and the additional tree code requirements are also further
addressed.
Seven copies of the plans and nanative are provided with the neighborhood mailing labels.
If you have any further questions regarding the re-submittal please call at 503-229-4449.
Sincerely,
Dougl s Campbell, A.I.C.P.
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc
3851 SW 50�'Avenue; Portland ,OR 97221 �Phone: 503-229-4449�Fax: 503-297-3537
City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. � Ttgaf-a!6R 97223
��
.
.
June 13, 2008
�.... =;,,.
Doug Campbell
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc.
3851 SW 50�'Avenue
Portland, OR 97221
RF: Completeness Review- Repta Partition
Case File No. MLP2008-00005
Dear poug:
The City has received your application for Minor Land Partition (MLP2007-00005) to divide
one lot into two at 11400 SW 90�'Avenue. Staff has determined your application to be
complete as of 6/13/2008.
The review process will now begin and is expected to take about 6 weeks. Please be aware
that staff has not reviewed the application for compliance with the code and may request
additional items during the review period.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (503) 718-2712. Thank you.
Sincerely,
�%'� � ---
Emily Eng
Assistant Planner
Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772
• •
Emily Eng
From: Doug Campbell [doug@cpd-services.com]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 10:00 AM
To: Emily Eng
Subject: RE: Repta Partition
Attachments: REPTA SITE (3).pdf; REPTA EROSION (3).pdf; Existing conditions.pdf
I included the site plan and erosion control/utilities plan in the application reports, appendix A. see the attached PDFs
including existing conditions.
Doug Campbell
Campbell Planning and Development
Ph: 503-229-4449
Fax: 503-297-3537
Cell: 503-539-9994
From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 9:15 AM
To: 'Doug Campbell'
Subject: Repta Partition
Doug,
I don't see the 6 copies of reduced size plans that was requested for the completeness submittal. These are typically 11
x 17 and get sent to the utility companies. You may either drop those off or if you can send a pdf I can print them out.
Thanks,
Emily
-------------------------------
Emily Eng
Assistant Planner
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard, OR 97223
P: (503) 718-2712
F: (503) 718-2748
www.ti�ard-or.gov
1
�
.. . �
Emily Eng
From: Kim McMillan
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 4:13 PM
To: 'Doug Campbell'
Cc: Emily Eng
Subject: RE: Repta Partition
It is the responsibility of the developer, in this case the partitioner,to provide a lot that is ready to be built on. We do
not condition the improvements to a future building permit.
Kim
___ __ _ _ _ __
From: Doug Campbell [mailto:doug@cpd-services.com]
Sent: Tuesday, ]une 24, 2008 3:00 PM
To: Emily Eng
Cc: Kim McMillan
Subject: RE: Repta Partition
I'm not sure what the public improvements would be except the driveway apron and curb cut at the cul-de-sac, and
possibly a storm drain in the r-o-w which are all related to building a new house on the property. Those improvements
should be able to be conditioned to be permitted and constructed with the building permit and at time of constructing a
building on the new flag lot after final plat approval. I would like to propose this if possible. There is no reason the
property owner should have to bond these limited improvements when they can be conditioned as part of a future building
permit for the property. Let me know. thanks
Doug Campbell, AICP
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc.
Ph: 503-229-4449
Fax: 503-297-3537
Cell: 503-539-9994
From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 2:43 PM
To: 'Doug Campbell'
Cc: Kim McMillan
Subject: RE: Repta Partition
Doug,
The owner will have to do the public improvements prior to the plat being signed. He may be able to bond for certain
improvements, but that also has to be done before the final plat is approved.
-Emily
From: Doug Campbell [mailto:doug@cpd-services.com]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 3:31 PM
To: Emily Eng
Subject: RE: Repta Partition
Hi Emily, I wanted to follow-up on the Repta Partition. We would like to have a condition of approval allowing us to record
the plat for the partition without the required site improvements and utility connections being in place, with the condition
that all required improvements per the partition would be put in place at the time a house is built. Since the improvements
are very limited and will be related to building the house (ie. Driveway, sewer and water line and driveway curtain and
some landscaping}. The owner would like to wait on those improvements until he has plans with a builder on type and
1
location of a house and the final locatic�the hookups, ect. —all related to a new�e on the property. Let me know.
Thanks
Doug Campbell, A.I.C.P.
Campbell Planning and Development
Ph: 503-229-4449
Fax: 503-297-3537
Cell: 503-539-9994
From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 9:15 AM
To: 'Doug Campbell'
Subject: Repta Partition
Doug,
I don't see the 6 copies of reduced size plans that was requested for the completeness submittal. These are typically 11
x 17 and get sent to the utility companies. You may either drop those off or if you can send a pdf I can print them out.
Thanks,
Emily
-------------------------------
Emily Eng
Assistant Planner
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard, OR 97223
P: (503) 718-2712
F: (503) 718-2748
www.ti�ard-or.�ov
2
LAND USE APPLICATION
' ��������
FOR MINOR LAND PARTITION !N 1 2 2008
i.�,4..Y(aFTfrAR7
;:�, ;�R���lnl4�+����!I�J�
REPTA PARTITION
I JuNe 10, 2008
(Revised)
�
Submitted To
I City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
I Tigard, OR 97223
I Ap�licant/Pronerty Owner
I Vasile Repta
11400 SW 90th Avenue
Tigard, OR
�
I Applicant's Representative
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc.
� 3851 SW 50`h Avenue
Portland, OR 97221
Phone: 503-229-4449
� Fax: 503-297-3537
�
�
�
�
Table of Contents
PROJECT INFORMATION
A. Application Forms
B. Project Information Summary
C. Tax Map
D. Title/Deed
NARRATIVE
A. Project Description
B. Develapment Code Standards:
APPENDIX
A. Plans
B. Pre-application notes
C. Arborist's Report
D. Property Pictures
E. Clean Water Services Provider Letter
F. Water Flow Test
PROJECT INFORMATI4N
PR&APP.HEID BY
�
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION
� : �� LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATI�N
Ctty of Ti�zrr�Pem�t C�,erner 13125 S W Hall Blu�, Ti�tz� �R 97223
I Phor� 503.639.4171 F�: 503.598.1960
File!� Other Case#
I
Date By � Receipt{i Fee Date Complete �
I TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR
❑ Adjustment/Variance (I or II) �Minor Land Panition(II) ❑Zone Change (III)
I ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(I� ❑Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation(I�
❑ Condiuonal Use(III) ❑Sensitive Lands Review(I,II or III} ❑Zone Ordinance Amendment(I�
I ❑ I-�istoric Overlay(II or III) ❑Site Development Review(TI)
❑ Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or III)
A s av e
I � O O cJ D� wc!�P
&
�1. 5 � 3S z o0
I E
. �o.Z �¢GreS R -`'1S
Arrucnrrr� I
� A z
S� -P e T
!l yo a c,> o�' �ve�u-P
N .
50 3-�zo -�s s S
IMARY N A ON
,pou Ca� �-e`/ c��-J So3 -�1�-y�Y�'
PR PER OWNE EED HOLDER Aaac c more one
�z 511-e � T
A I
< l yO0 S �J �'O � /�itk!/
N .
�o3-G�o-$S ��
'`When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written
authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form
or submic a written authorization with this a lication.
R POSAL SLII��vLp.RY P ease e spec ic
�r•or � �vk- vr T ,
�
i
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS
DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMTTTAL REQLTIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET.
:.�,....-..i.,�..,.,�..,��i,...a ..�,,,....-.r.�,..,,,.,��i.,.,a ....,,..o....,...,...,a,.,.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Jurisdiction: City of Tigard
Department of Land Use and Transportation
13125 SW Hall Blvd.,
Tigard, OR 97223
Applicant: Vasile Repta
11400 SW 90t''Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
ApplicanYs Campbell Planning and Development, Inc.
Representative: 3851 SW 50th Avenue
Portland, OR 97221
(503) 229-4449
Contact: Doug Campbell
Property Information: 11400 SW 90�' Avenue
Parcel: 1 s135DA02900
Location: Generally located off SW 90�' Avenue South of
Greenburg Road
Current Zoning: R-4.5
Project Area: .62 Acres
Surveyor: Ferguson Land Surveying, Inc
8134 SW Taylor Street
Portland, OR 97215
503-408-0602
Contact: Joe Ferguson
Request: Minor Land Partition for 2 lots.
--�-p�-�- .,' " ��� : 7 f �:.,� -> � ,..,�„.,..,�„r;�,,.. 35..,. �� � 35�r,
�. � � f�,�,-- �� �
^� ,,.nr+�...�.�..�„„+�i�,.. �_ ,�,k,s I , s� � ,
A[ t�^ < �,� ' '"" '"'"�. "*":.
'� � � _ . .QA„HAM„C�B�� �� � � . � �. � •� � � u�yI�� p„�_�__ � I l�s�.-�� . ���. . . .
� lAfS3175 2roe�C. . � 61W1AMA�lffS i a�D --�..- -.as rpae� �5�. .'uiAC ' iy� .
� '� � . VACJITED7l.16R36 . 'VAG�fF�)H-6l36 �u�C . . �ry� I f � -�'".. �7y��~�. .�h�� .�M•
• , . �� � �$ � . � . � . � � I �. . . , .� . ".
'� .�.«.,.n........��;.�•/t.:.y....�:.��..a.- 4�� °�""'� - _ _ _ .. t xa�o � . .� .� `. . E . � .�.�Mw ,;,,w. ,7•P�.nww,' ,-r
�� � mn -� -_� __- _ _ ���^. . , n�c - " `""�+""�.`..,�....:...,� �� . . . _. ,`. .
s . _
. . --�-= =-�� �'M�44 `erw�en��' �nscee� - -- ._.r.aw � F ��'� �. I MS ��.��bx ruw� tM�r ,+M'�".� ia�w
{ ��.` •.� �• �� «u -__ _ _-__ .�ao _�Mne L� ._� .�__. .-� .
} I \ i -_ __-'. -- 4�,i...
� � � I a� t�01 " � I "�� .
� /
25 i � '� e� �� r sl .s.»
seoo yl 27 i . '9/�n B cnuownc�s -- ---�`- � ��� C f � �'..:_ °
m
'-'1 wio`�-�� .���c � `j9 1Af513-t/621 l 9 . .
� ,�,b. � � ? �'� � wwFO�e�iee�e z+a: r I
�� ..ljK 6�AHA I =e i S�.; ' �,� • I �� Ae"�� � � -- — 2 WASHINGTON COUNN OREGON
q_ � . I 'q �/ +��� �""�' �������„ NE7/4SE1/4SECTION36T1SR1WW.M.
-r-- i "''-�r. �„�.1- ._ �'�� �.,s� ,�� � "..° ---�---- - �.... _ scn�e�- �oo
, � �
��, K ± � � �.s�� i�l��_ %,y a �o �� � a' 3 j� ; � o �',�.� �,�-- T ;—.F �-,
e�I.o_ � '�� �o T l � yGy � �� „ � " - �.,,K 3e'si r!,i�a; a�. as ;ae,sr
a. -� �1 xz9a .� _�, zeox �I ��� '9Y '�Y(y S ,��i°S r-•- � �x � i
� I �� �� zs I ��I �4'�_ �O �9y � '� � aoo b s r`� a a� �1 . �, '.
n.c � 4 �9� � aa�c p�+000 '2j , t� � � ' {� .w"c -. * �.� �
�1 � � � �i ����i aiec �� � . . .. �"`^R844..`«�� �+ � � 7� ?� -A 1C� !7 �4
e«a�_��_'_ - s� I�� ,p 4L �- --_ - . i > . y7
iwae fi.,-I. .13. .T��F �!Y 1��
aR o..0 i � ' .a ���r „n.n � ��_?_�� .� _.---- 'ES � x27i � � � . :.� 3i� 11f�1
---sw --t�re��r�t—�--oa�� -�.�,;; t �� S� �.K , r i-�--�
�rewsr�err """""s'Ff��E�^�� �M 6 xs � � 4r �4 1 �4{4r,' s�2 Yf]N �A ,
..'�^-M � ..�..-..,��.-,..,,,� ___—� . � „o, �*^. �rcone�: �a�aee —� t t � _.._..fi . ,
.i2 . ��� H 7q.°' °°. g{ �� I . �-�''a'..� '� .nw�w�m.���. � � —�O Z�� i �� ia -g 25 '90 2B� 2Y�. 'I7 7E�.26 d0��
_�.��---. � ��--.,,x �. � � x�ox � �. .m�c a/c k .. �: `- ---,
„�"°' s, 0 i„ �P+nz � ���r�, �� ».c se�oo ?� - - ----- --�-- ae :{a a3��3+ 9s :sb a1�'
�- _K U��' r ,..,, � �� �+`� A'",,� 1 ' :wo ° I i r. .d:,`�!r I.` a I ?,�.1 e�'
�.m� � ��---�'-_� Q�. � s�� ^n n .ei�e � w . . "_�__
z,� x t'.�°' R `I 7701 aB00 ll sy �L3 x� �., t6 � I i I� iOAADDR70NALNAPtVIERWR WEBSlIEAT
_,n,�,�� ,< � . aM -- � '����'��,-.� �� �E .o.� ' ���� � Q,,. v v � --- F J �K ie I = _ wwn.co.ia��6Wlon.o..us -
��.„g - .: � a ��.J �M. �.I f' Ip ,—�y�eP -=g^ _ � r�8� ���� I ea," aR; e9;. .�,u'�i
� , '°°�"' �.
i', _ A � Z
�° y .-.t.e� ,...........aua,,.,,.,,, "�`� /'' � 'r����:000-- �� �
_ 8 `A � hsa ms^° ��`2 .ZOO t : .< , � �1 mawn ��! N�� � �„� _'� ��'�_,
� � . _r�_ �,g-YT i_�i_� �� nu� ��. ?rK ��� i� ��. �.7! � I �E � ��aa�c ��il'o� � 6C' �-9D:.� AC� , pp .
,.��,�C� ��y,.�•�.�„°� '„'a'ee�w' �, _ aa�c4`b� �� ���� , xeot . ��� � '_teoo � � � u� � � �, � . ��,�» . �g� ���' �f _ I
� �/�e tn ,o.,. ° � ,.�.. � .n�. 1 -� ` �- "-�� `, ,.oe,�c �vl -- - - - . ��°!"a I �,,4 I I ' z �� . ,�$��ia. �, .�G.�'���v.,�„Jr`----'
!4"" i up . 9 I r fiu. ' n�.n CB Gi, .1 DB DA
u^ � . '�„"�3' ���.y..�....w �: 9 3 r� � I+aa� �f � ---- -- �y I �--�=�• � n� _�Y.: . 1 ' I
/e .aa ��9 +soo waw .aa,
''�n�°.;c:.' � "���a�,;�' � s:ic 'k! ia80�c �-'j� � �� I ---SW PFAFFLE a ---^'i P p, I
+;; ��,0 1s n� ��i. i � .»a�. I, � � ��I 31,�REE'f
� p �-�d. s .n� � � � '� ,,,�, �.« , , ; ,� ,a,.,�, �.Df`i� Qo�:��iSC' DO:
�� ,� � 1�I � `-"-� � -- r. . ','�---�,ii�.c ? \� � \ ` noc - �� "w�- �.�
.a...n......l.�R .,.a:.N£l.. d�.,r,.,mF�,:' % Malq. ��.. \ I I �`110DC7 .' . '..
.,�. 43;j 'Fm--m�- o; xeoo � a000 � ''� � g� \ �t �,.1 ,z�DO�c°n �. ' CancslleCTWOta For. 181950A
, g f ' a A2i.c ]]IG � �� 18�`� \�'�J .�. s •,����� 2501RlM7DOlAA0.1401�1/017�U�9100.9l.02.
q I ,',�6,' �'.�9� ^iq��. '�rr 1_��� 'I j g 'Tm1.4lOO�AOO,DOD�YOU.2E01.7��1�OOS100.
� n�� F1�. � F{ �' - !. f --- _-- _� .�� �..��r p� .,nx �roo.ieoi.noo.teaoaioo.tzoo.�oo.
"`fi�Sdfi".'�., ,.`teal"� ._- sa�e z _- aii� -_ '.
�9 --- ._ � 1700 . � �`.12 � . .
�..'�°°°° g` �viats �w:,. . i:�iT i ..A I� `i���'i, � r"� � I ti''�8/ ia- . .
_ 1� . 1� lE 3603 hr'O O I j' '��
t �wr m�.w� g �g{ � { n•"E . ae�c �
��� �3 � alnc.�� R C :� �. .� � '��. i w � - xf- � - .
.i oq_�� �J"� , I ' . �n W a 'ti°°��� 1600 � � � S� .
4 fi � i ��$ �' ` '°'Y-;�, ,m�v. Z a�4.� � aw'�' :m�u.ei �i�c �.�. �Y , .
2 0 01 w
�n� e �R fiao'p. � am'r°��� � �9 W i>.af �_.n�_ � - '� I .
ia x I ;"�°° ,s ,°am°sel ' D:S, '���.b li ,..�tE���. ,�a �' �.��o � r � — -- ---- ----�
� w � .��. � '2�J`G� ,�� � C� � —_ d ��� au.. � ����,���� �`� � �soo � � �l'�F �
-- 1 � � �"'---.11sL.'. -'�'---_ (}� �a.� ----�,-._ x •JI� ��nc '�n ,.�.. - '�a5.S�'-�R+yg�;�GCll���P5�U
man W � �� .� �'�.qi . � . � ��mmo � . .'V .�i'aa � J -__ _ittl�sn�i�� �_� �" � - ���'���
y�i�am° iit. �°��.. 4�l �.+m�� uoo ' '°' �� I
ii..�� Q ��Z�ao. �1 �.:�s�c , . . "=--� {g �. `� �.>aec � r.�i�. � �� �i0oo'- .ao.�.. � '�1 � ;��1 ') 0 �� illl
__� � 3 -�� � __ ; �� � �� -�- -- :; _ � � � -- _ ��
"°° � R � �J �zu.e,�.n_" j� � -- �"I� a�`;•, � , P�OT DATE:December 08,2006
� � I Q n�o �: i�ot -� —�---
�� � .._._J� �J � �T � � n�. _� � sna a K.�i�o�i � ���c (' 3 �.' �� FORASSESSMENTPURPOSES
$I<'� : �{�. . �n,a°° .�, . i- .a��ec� �� . .t2 �' 1� `� � � � n,.o, ` i ` i. � ONLY-DO NOT RELY ON
ii i ti .s�,c Q ` , � � �.� a mn r C �!rw �� " FOROTHER USE
e 8 .�4 $re q� � `� s �I p �` ,'w".,: �, se I � �.....aea.r.n �u�.. .,�
.>m.-�� � . � �1 I J { '�'�'dD � -. _- � � . � �' � - � � �y r�m e�e a�nnn�r��amr+��rama no�,n+eereue mo�n�
p'..�.���.,.�� �. �m�f l8 .. ry.�t�'- . . tM.t�: '. �� mrsMMWMGwMrLS.Ab�nm�fuRMes{ryopiwsmqo
1 1 �`
r� � + [ SY� � ' .32K � BI � C' �= h . �. ����— ------Q - �11 II � ��,. ,orMemwtcrmrr!nbmNan
�;o y� b.� l,x �O, 4r,R �.�} � -_-. .� il � ��� . . � . . . -. I I �w�m ¢9'+F. �3. .
J � � i ! �� g =i �� � � ^'� ' ��& » .��� � - �� � ..ec �4,-rf <�
C 9 '1 �
s�—� � � S �� �t � � tl 4. � n I RI 't', �':'1 S �
� S 9 9. L� �� � �a�c �� �°�i. .� � .r—"`"�-i �� � � -t��f J��` ,��n.w ,,� ��j� r TICiARD
tlw,,,wu 1 S 1 35DA 1 S 1 35DA
�� AbtEk1
c
4t� "f,�, THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR REC iR'S USE
���
Aher recording retuin to:
Vasile Renta
11400 SW 90th Avenue �
TiQard OR 97223 _
Until a change is requested all taz statements
shall be sent to the following address:
asile Renta �+,�,i'.�ru4Y'L�U(iEt� HtvQ tiPf'ii�J�D
11400 SW 90th Avenue 7�
��
Tlaard OR 97223 x
�� ��,�K.,��..�_�-,--...-..
Escrow No. 02092148
Tide No. 980217
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
Maria June,Grantor,conveys and warrants to Vasile Repta and Lidia Repta husband and wife,Grantee,
the following described real property free of liens and encumbrances, except as specifically set forth
herein:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part herein:
This property is free of liens and encumbrances, EXCEPT:
Easements, Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of record, if any.
THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS
INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS,
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE
TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CTTY OR COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS
ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930.
1fie true consideration for this conveyance is$210 000.00 exen��r wa���°9'��`°�°f o�s 93.030>
Dated this U day of � �'
��
Maria Jung
STATE OF OREGON 1 ,
County of Clackanias j Ss'
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this�day of Janu , 2a13
by Maria]un� . <
� � � � • Notary Public for Oregon
oFFic�q�sEA� • My �orrunission expires:
MELANIE GILL
f�IOTARY PUB�IC-OREfiON
' '� COMMISSION NO.333005
j MY COMMISSIQN EXPIRES APRIL 4,2004
4�
N�►R�ATIVE
Repta Minor Land Partition
Narrative
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant requests review for a 2-lot partition. 'I'he property is located at 11400 SW 90`�
Avenue. The property has an existing house and a shed which will be kept on one of the lots
(Parcel 1). Access to the existing house will remain off SW 90�'Avenue. The second lot(Parcel
2) will include the rear portion of the property, which has an existing flag access driveway onto
SW Lomita Avenue and is a dead end street with a cul-de-sac(see the attached site plan).
The property is .62 acres and is zoned R-4.5 which allows lots of 7,500 sf. The applicant is
requesting a partition of the property into two lots as is shown on the existing conditions map and
preliminary partition plan. The existing house and shed will be included on the front parcel
(Parcel 1) of 15,447 sf and will maintain its existing access and utility connections to SW 90�'
Avenue, no other improvements are proposed for Parcel 1.
The vacant portion of the property will be split into a flag lot that will access onto SW Lomita
Avenue to the west (Parcel2). The lot will be 10,448 sf and will be 90 feet wide for most of the
lot width for 85 feet and reduces down to 61.5 feet for approximately 44 feet. The total length of
Parcel 2 is 129 feet. The existing flag portion of Parcel 2 will be 15 feet wide providing
adequate access to Parcel2. T'he property is flat with a slight slope toward SW Lomita Avenue.
The existing conditions site plan shows the location of existing trees on the property that are over
12 inches in caliper. An arborist has conducted a tree survey and has provided a tree protection
and mitigation plan. Four trees located in the center area of Parcel II are proposed to be removed
and only one tree is over 12" caliper. Please see the attached tree mitigation and protection plan
and the arborist's repot, Appendix C. There are no sensitive areas on the site.
Adequate utility connections can be made within Lomita Avenue. Tualatin Valley Water
provides water services to the property via a 4 inch water line. The City of Tigard has a sewer
line ending within the cul-de-sac of SW Lomita Avenue, which can be connected to the property.
Drainage will be handled onsite and discharged into SW Lomita Avenue where drainage water
can be collected into the existing drainage system serving SW Lomita Avenue. Only minor
improvements will be necessary for the utility connections, new access driveway and curb cut for
the construction of the residential house.
This proposed partition dedicates future right-of—way along 90`� Avenue, but no frontage
improvements are proposed along SW 90`h Avenue or SW Lomita Avenue cul-de-sac. The
partition will take access off of SW Lomita Avenue and will maintain the existing access for the
house off SW 90`"Avenue, so no improvements are proposed for the existing house or the access
driveway(Parcel 1). The applicant does not believe that frontage improvements or a sidewalk is
warranted along SW 90"' Avenue or SW Lomita Avenue because only one additional lot and
future home is proposed with minimal impacts from current conditions to warrant such
improvements. Additionally, there are no sidewalks along SW 90`h Avenue and limited
opportunities for additional lot creation or opportunities for sidewalks to be built in the vicinity of
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc.
Repta Partition
the property. See further discussion of improvements in Section 18.810 of this narrative and the
Impact Study, Section III.
The applicant requests an adjustment to the city's standards of requiring frontage improvements
or sidewalks along the property's frontage as well as for entering into a future improvements
guarantee in lieu of street improvements as allowed in Section 18.810.030 A.7. The granting an
adjustment and exception to the standard requiring frontage improvements will not cause any risk
to public safety or any negative impacts to the public interest for the reasons discussed in this
application. The proposed partition will only create one additional lot or residential home, will
not change existing access to SW 90`�' Avenue, and the neighborhood is fully built out with
limited opportunities for future development to add improvements. Additionally, its not
anticipated or expected that the city would ever consider widening the neighborhood street or add
sidewalks. The property owner would agree to a non-remonstrance agreement for any future
improvements in the off chance the city or neighborhood ever considered and pursued
improvements for SW 90�'Avenue—which is very unlikely.
II. DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS(SECTION 18.00)
18.390 Decision-Making Procedures
18.390.020 DescripNon of Decision-Making Procedures
The proposed 2-lot Land Partition review will be processed through a Type II review
process. A pre-application meeting was held with the City on March 4th to review the
proposal and city application requirements. All required submittal information as
identified in Section 18.390.040.B as it relates to the minor partition has been included in
this application.
Regarding the requirement for an impact study to quantify the effect of the development
on public facilities and services,no development is proposed at this time, so the impact
study is limited to identifying facilities,availability to the partitioned property and
cunent capacities witti ability to service the new property and its potential future use as
residential housing. Please see Section III addressing the Impact Study requirements.
18.420 Land Partitions
18.420.050 Approval Criteria
1. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements
and regulations;
As provided in this application and narrative all statutory and ordinance
requirements have been addressed.
2. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
The property has adequate public facilities to service the property as is
summarized further in this narrative under section 18.810 "Street and Utility
Improvement Standards," and within Section III, "Impact Study."
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. 2
Repta Partition
3. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and
Proposed improvements are discussed further in this application. Its anticipated
that the proposed partition can meet the required improvement standards.
4. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
a. The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot
requirement of the applicable zoning district.
The partitioned property lot widths meet the residential zoning requirements of
50 feet for a single family residential lot. The lot widths are 129 feet for the
front lot (Parcel 1) and 90 feet for Parcel2 for 85 feet then the lot width is
reduced to 61.5 feet for the back portion of the lot.
b. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In
the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area
calculation.
The front lot including the existing house is 15,447 sf and the rear lot is 10,448
sf not counting the flag portion of the lot.
c. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-
of-way by at least 1 S feet or have a legally recorded minimum I S foot wide
access easement.
The partitioned property will have frontage along SW 90�' Avenue and SW
Lomita Avenue. The front lot with the existing house will have a frontage of
129 feet. The rear flag lot will have frontage onto Lomita Avenue of 18 feet
which will serve as the access driveway.
d. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
All setback requirements are shown on the site plan and can be met with future
development.
e. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the
location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet.
Structures shall generally be located so as to mazimize separation from existing
structures.
The front yard will be the southerly property lot line where the driveway is
located connecting to Lomita Avenue. The proposed future structure can be
located in the middle of the lot maintaining 10 foot sideyard setbacks.
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. 3
Repta Partition
f. A screen shall be provided along the properry line of a lot of record
where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting
lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.050. Screening may also be required to
maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation
areas for proposed development.
The future development of the site will meet all required screening and
landscape requirements. Along the access driveway existing arborvitae trees
are located along the north side of the driveway and would be kept. Additional
landscaping is shown on the proposed site plan/preliminary plat along the south
side of the access driveway.
g. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the
length of an accessway would have a detrimental e,fJ`'ect on fire fighting
capabilities.
A fire hydrant is located in front of the property along SW 90�' Avenue at the
northwest corner of the property. The existing fire hydrant provides adequate
fire protection to the existing home and the new lot. A fire flow test was done
for the hydrant and is included with the attached documents of this application.
h. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a
reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be
recorded with the approved partition map.
No common driveways are proposed.
S. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705,
Access, Egress, and Circulation.
See section 8.705 Access, Egress and Circulation. All requirements for access
and circulation can be met.
6. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-
hundred year floodplain, the Ciry shall require consideration of the dedication
of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain.
This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a
pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance tivith the adopted
pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan.
The property is not located within a 100 year floodplain.
7. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall
be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Uariances and Adjustments. The
applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed
concurrently.
No variances or adjustments are proposed for meeting the requirements of this
section of the development code.
Campbell Planning and Development,Inc. 4
Repta Partition
18.530 Residential Zoning District
18.530.020 List of Zoning District.
D. R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District
The property is zoned as Low Density Residential.
18.530.040 Development Standards
Mimimum Lot Size 7,500 SF Lot 1: 15,447 sf
Lot 2: 10,448 sf
Minimum lot Width
Single Family 50 feet Lot 1 is 130 feet
Lot 2 is 90 feet
Minimum Setbacks Future building on site will
Front 20 � meet required setbacks—see
site plan
Side facing Street on Corner 15 ft
Side 5 ft
Rear 15 ft
Garage Entrance 20 ft
Maximum Height 1 '/z stories or 25 Based on Section 18.730
Flag Lot: feet,2 '/� stories or Exceptions to Development
35 feet maximum Standards for a Flag Lot a
subject to section future home on the site will
18.730.020 C.2 need to be 1 1/z stories or 25 feet
tall which ever is less, or meet
standands of 18.730.020 or
apply for a height variance.
Maximum Site Coverage None Future building will meet set
back requirements and will
provide for rear back yards.
Minimum Landscape None Screening landscaping will be
Requirement provided when the lots are built
on.
18.705 Access,Egress, and Circulation
18.705.030 General Provisions
D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections
18.705.03 and 18.705.03 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved
by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a
continuous basis.
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. 5
Repta Partition
The proposed Parcel 1 including the existing house will maintain its existing
driveway connection to SW 90�'Avenue. The rear flag lot will have a 15 foot
driveway access onto SW Lomita Avenue.
E. Curb cuts.
No curbs are proposed for this partition. The driveway cut and apron for Parcel 2
will match with adjacent driveways and will be further addressed with the permit
construction approvals.
F. Required walkway locations.
No onsite pedestrian walkways are proposed.
G. Inadequate or hazardous access.
The proposed partition will not create any traffic issues or diminish the existing
traffic conditions to an unsafe condition or create inadequate access for
emergency vehicles which can access the property from the existing street
network. The partition will increase travel and trips on SW Lomita Avenue by
only a few trips during the peak hour and the total average weekday trips will be
minimal.
H. Access management.
1. No access report is provided for this 2 lot partition since the partition is
not creating any new streets or private roads. The existing house will maintain
its existing driveway,and the flag lot will have access onto SW Lomita drive and
will provide a curb cut driveway apron which will match with the existing
driveways onto the cul-de-sac. The access driveway will maintain its required 15
foot frontage for a flag lot driveway.
2-3. The access driveways will access onto existing local neighborhood roads,
there are not accesses proposed onto a collector or arterial.
4. No new local streets are being proposed and the partition will not impact
existing local street spacing.
I. Minimum access reguirements for residential use.
Vehicle access to the partitioned property will meet the required standards for
access as stated in table 18.705.3.
18.715 Density Computations
B. CalculaNng maximum number of residendal units.
The total net square feet of the property is 25,879 s£ The zoning of the property
allows lot sizes of 7,500 s£ The allowable density of the property therefore is
3.45 lots (25,879/7,500=3.45 lots). The minimum density is 21ots.
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. 6
Repta Partition
18.730 ExcepNons to Development Standards
18.730.20 ExcepNons to Building Height Limitations
A. Projections not used for Human Habitation.
No projections are proposed at this time
B. Buildin�Hei ht Exceptions.
The site is not in a non-residential zone so this standard does not apply.
C. Buildin Hei�hts and Fla�Lots.
1. Limitations of the placement of residential structures on flag lots apply
when any of the following exits.
A flag lot is created through a lot partition process. So the limitations to
placement of a structure on the lot and height limitations apply to the flag
lot. No buildings are proposed at this time, any future buildings will
comply with the building height and flag lot setback requirements.
2. Maximum Height for an attached or detached single-family,duplex., or
multiple family residential structure on a flag lot or a lot having sole access form
an accessway,private drive or easement is 1 '/z stories or 25 feet, whichever is
less, except that the maximum height may be 2 '/z stories or 35 feet whichever is
less provided:
a. The future proposed building can comply with all applicable
dimensional standards.
b. The 10 foot side yard will be maintained and is shown on the
attached site plan.
c. The residential structures to the east,west, and south of the
building area of the flag lot are within 50 feet and the houses to the east
and to the south are 1 story houses and the house to the west is a two
story house. It appears that the flag lot will not meet the allowances for a
house exceeding 1 Y2 stories or 25 feet. Further height measurements
will be needed at the time of building permit to show that the lot can
meet the standards for a matcimum height higher than 1 '/2 stories or 25
feet.
d. If it's deternuned that the maximum height is allowed then
additional landscape buffering requirements may be necessary if
windows 15 feet or more above grade may face a neighboring house
windows or patio.
3. The applicant is proposing screening and plantings along the eastern and
western property line for additional screening for the new home when it is built.
4. The applicant or future owner of the lot will plant trees subject to the
conditions of approval at time of building permit issuance.
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. �
Repta Partition
18.730.030 Zero Lot Line Setback Standards
No zero lot line setbacks are proposed.
18.730.50 Miscellaneous Requirements and Exceptions
D. Projections into required,yyards.
The existing deck will extend a few feet into the proposed rear setback of Parcel
1,but will not extend past approximately 9 feet of the rear setback. When Parcel
2 is developed with a new residence, site obscuring trees or bushes will be
planted along the Parcel 2 westerly property line as is generally shown on the site
plan.
18.745 Landscaping and Screening
18.745.020 Applicability
The partition application is not proposing a change of the existing use on the property and
is only partitioning off the back portion of the property. 'There is no proposal at this time
for development or home building of the partitioned rear parcel therefore no detailed
landscaping is proposed at this time, except as is required to meet other requirements of
the code for buffering and screening.
18.745.040 Street Trees
A. Protection of existing vegetation:
The proposed partition will be protecting existing vegetation on the site except
where building area and driveway areas are proposed. The proposed partition
does not create a road or driveway that exceeds 100 feet in length, so no street
trees are proposed. The property's frontage of SW 90�'Avenue is approximately
129 feet in length. The applicant proposes 2 to 3 trees along the property's
frontage between the driveway and the north property line within the right-of-
way of SW 90�'Avenue.
As a condition of approval the applicant will submit a street tree plan indicating
species, size and spacing of street trees at the time construction permitting and
prior to final plat approval. The preliminary site plan is showing 3 trees with one
tree being removed and replaced along the frontage. Sizing and spacing shall
comply with Section 18.745.040 C.2
B. Street tree plannin,g list.
The applicant will provide a planting list and details as specified in the City's tree
planting lists at time of construction permitting.
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. g
Repta Partition
C. Size and spacing of street trees.
The applicant has shown generally the location of street trees on the proposed
site plan for the partition along SW 90`�Avenue. The applicant will provide a
detailed planting plan as part of the construction plans for the partition.
18.745.050 Buffering and Screening
B. Buffering and Screening Requirements
The following buffering and screening is proposed and is shown on the proposed
site plan:
1. Along the flag pole driveway: The existing arborvitae trees on the north
side of the drive of Parcel II will be preserved. A 6 foot fence or site
obscuring bushes/trees is proposed along the south side of the driveway
and will continue the length of Parcel2's south property line.
2. Future fencing and/or site obscuring bushes and trees is proposed along
the westerly property line within the 10 foot setback area of Parcel II.
3. Existing trees will be retained on site as is shown on the tree plan and
discussed in the arborist's tree protection and mitigation report.
Details of the type of plantings,size and location will be provided as part of the
final construction plans.
18.'765 Off Street Parking&Loading
The proposed lots can provide ample off street parking of a least 2 spaces for each lot
and/or house. The front house can accommodate more than two spaces and the flag lot
will also be able to accommodate ample parking meeting the city's parking requirements
for single family housing.
18.790 Tree Removal
18.790.030 Tree Plan Requirement
A. Tree plan required.
A tree plan showing the existing trees and those proposed for removal has been prepared
and certified by a tree arborist. See attached plan and tree arborist report.
B. Plan Requirements.
1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees.
A certified tree arborist has conducted a survey of all the trees on the property
and developed a tree plan for the protection,removal and replacement of the trees
on site. five trees are proposed to be removed out of a total of 30 trees and only
one of the trees proposed for removal is larger than 12"caliper. The trees
proposed to be removed due to future construction include trees 74,75,83, 84 and
88. All of the trees proposed for removal on site are fruit trees. An additional
tree is proposed for removal along the 90`�'Avenue R-O-W(tree# 88). An
additional tree identified in the arborist's report for removal will be kept if
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. 9
Repta Partition
possible along the south property line(tree# 86). The trees to be removed are
located in the most logical area for a building on Parcel2.
The tree arborist report and tree plan identifies the methods and protection zones
for the existing trees to be protected during construction. Please see the attached
tree plan and the tree mitigation report.
2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree
removal over 12 inches.
T'he applicant plans on removing only one tree on site over 12 inch caliper which
is tree number"75"and is a fruit tree. Two other trees proposed for removal are
at 12"caliper and aze also fruit trees. According to the tree Arborists no
mitigation is required.
3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed.
Only one tree over 12 inch caliper is proposed to be removed which is tree
number"75"and is a Fig tree. The four trees to be removed on site are located in
the building area of Parcel2,with one additional tree located in the R-O-W of
90�'Avenue. All the trees to be removed are identified on the tree plan and are
listed in the tree surmnary table included in the arborist's report.
4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used
by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction.
A protection program for protecting trees during and after construction is
provided in the arborist's report.
C. Subsequent tree removal.
No significant trees have been removed in the past year from this application.
Additional Tree Plan Requirements
1. How does the site, lot and/or building layout maximize tree retention?
Most of the trees are proposed to be kept on site; only the trees that fall directly
in the middle of the flag lot's developable/building area are proposed to be
removed. Also the trees to be removed are not significant trees.
2. How have improvements such as roads, driveways, utilities, and walkways been
designed and located to mcrximize tree retention?
The driveway and utilities are located in the best possible location to provide
access to the lot. This location also does not impact any significant trees.
3. Have tree compatible construction techniques been considered and utilized?
Tree fencing is shown to protect existing significant trees; there are no other
special construction techniques proposed to protect trees because none are
needed or recommended by the tree arborist.
4. Is it possible to reduce the number of parking spaces to maximize tree retention?
Not applicable.
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. 10
Repta Partition
5. Is it possible to reduce the tota!number of lots to maximize tree retention?
No. The partition is only creating one additional loti
6. Could lot size averaging per Section 18.790.040(2) be utilized to maximize tree
retention?
No. The partition is only creating one additional lot and the lot size is not a
factor in tree retention.
7. Could lot width and/or depth per section 18.790.040(3) be utilized to maximize
tree retention?
No. The lot width and depths can not be adjusted to further protect trees.
8. How have buildings and buildingfootprints been designed to maximize tree
retention?
The proposed building area is located so that no significant trees are impacted.
Only small non-significant trees in the middle of the building area are proposed
to be removed. There are no other alternatives for the building that wouldn't
impact these trees or might impact other more significant trees.
9. Are off site trees that may be impacted by development inventoried and
adequately protected.
Yes, the survey has inventoried off site trees and no impacts are anticipated.
10. Describe additional techniques not mentioned above that have/will be used to
maximize tree retention.
See the tree arborist report regarding tree protection.
18.795 Visual Clearance
There are no changes proposed to the access drive from the existing house onto SW 90`h
Avenue; therefore, visual clearance will not be affected by the property partition. Clear
vision area is shown on the site plan. Access to the proposed rear lot,Parcel2,will be
from the cul-de-sac and there is clear visual clearance within the cul-de-sac.
18.810 Street& Utility Improvement Standards
18.810.030 Streets
A. Improvements
A.1-A.4 The proposed partition has adequate frontage along SW 90`h Avenue and SW
Lomita Avenue and direct access to these existing streets. No public or private streets are
proposed for this partition. Parcel I will access via an existing driveway onto SW 90"'
Avenue, and Parcel II will access via a 15 foot flag driveway onto SW Lomita Avenue, a
dead end cul-de-sac. The proposed partition will dedicate 2 feet of right-of way on SW
90`�'Avenue to provide required right-of-way for the local neighborhood street. A right-
of-way dedication is also shown for the access drive frontage onto SW Lomita Avenue;
though, it's the opinion of the applicant that this dedication is not necessary and the
property line should remain and match the properties on each side of the access drive.
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. 11
Repta Partition
The applicant is not proposing any frontage improvements along SW 90`h Avenue
because the partition is only for one additional lot that will access onto SW Lomita
Avenue, so no changes are expected to the existing conditions of SW 90�'Avenue. The
partition does not warrant frontage improvements for the following reasons:
1. There are no eacisting sidewalks on either side of SW 90�'Avenue or further
down to the south and north of the project site to North Dakota,which also does
not have sidewalks.There are no sidewalks throughout the connecting
neighborhood streets until you get down to Greenburg Road which is a major
collector street.
2. The neighborhood is currently fully developed with limited opportunities for
additional land to be subdivided into additional lots, so the potential for future
connections with new development(new sidewalks)is limited to non-existent. It
is not expected that the city would ever in the future condemn property to widen
the local street or build sidewalks in the established neighborhood—so it is
unreasonable to require improvements for such a limited impact to the
neighborhood.
3. If the city requires the construction of a sidewalk along the property's frontage it
would create a sidewalk island in front of the house for 110 feet that would not
serve any reasonable public purposes and would be considered pointless and an
excessive cost to the property owner—regaxdless of any rough proportionality
argument the city makes.
4. Because of the existing grade of the street,widening the street and constructing
curb and sidewalks along the property frontage is excessive. The grade would
have to be raised up and leveled creating undo expense and impacts to the
owner's property.
Regarding improvements on SW Lomita Avenue,the applicant is proposing dedication of
public right of way and will provide a new access driveway curb cut which will be
matched with the driveways on each side of the new driveway. The adjacent properties
are fully developed accessing the existing dead end cul-de-sac with limited to no
opportunity for the city or others to do future improvements, and there is no need to
expand the cul-de-sac or construct sidewalks around the cul-de-sac since none currently
exist along the road.
For the reasons stated above no frontage improvements are warranted and this proposed
partition should be exempt from any requirements for sidewalk or&ontage improvements
along SW 90"'Avenue or SW Lomita Avenue.
A similar partition approved in 2003 (Hoffinan Partition)which created three lots to the
south of the property on the opposite side of SW 90"'Avenue did not construct any
frontage improvements or a sidewalk along the property frontage—this is most likely
because of the reasons discussed above. Requiring the property owner to widen the road
or build a sidewalk would be pointless and not warranted and would be considered
excessive and burdensome on the property owner for this size of land division which
would create minunal to no impacts to the transportation system.
A.S: For the reasons stated above all frontage improvements required for this
classification of street should be exempt and not required. The applicant also does not
believe that a future improvement guarantee in lieu of street improvements is warranted
either; though,would agree to a non-remonstrance agreement toward a future road
improvement district or LID—though it's the opinion of the applicant that street
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. 12
Repta Partition
widening and sidewalk improvements are not warranted for this neighborhood street and
will never be approved or initiated by the city. The connection is not a primary
connection between two collectors and only acts as a minor neighborhood street with
local traffic—there is no reason the city or the neighborhood would want to widen the
street or expend funds for sidewalks.
A.7: The applicant requests an adjustment to the city's standards of requiring frontage
improvements or sidewalks along the property's frontage as well as for entering into a
future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements as allowed in Section
18.810.030 A.7. The granting an adjustment and exception to the standard requiring
frontage improvements will not cause any risk to public safety or any negative impacts to
the public interest for the reasons discussed previously. The proposed partition will only
create one additional lot or residential home,will not change existing access to SW 90`�
Avenue, and the neighborhood is fully built out with limited opportunities for future
development to add improvements. Additionally, its not anticipated or expected that the
city would ever consider widening the neighborhood street or add sidewalks. The
property owner would agree to a non-remonstrance agreement for any future
improvements in the off chance the city or neighborhood ever considered and pursued
improvements for SW 90`�Avenue—which is very unlikely.
B. Creation of rights-of-wav for streets and related purposes.
The applicant is proposing dedications for SW 90`h Avenue and SW Lomita Avenue to
meet city neighborhood street right-of-way requirements. The applicant is proposing a
dedication of 2 feet along SW 90"'Avenue, and currently is showing a dedication of 15
feet for the frontage onto the SW Lomita Avenue cul-de-sac. The applicant believes that
the 15 foot dedication along the SW Lomita Avenue is not warranted or needed since the
adjacent properties and road is fully developed and is on a dead end cul-de-sac—so there
is no reason to have such a dedication. The applicant would like staff and the city to
consider reducing the required dedication to match the adjacent property lines.
C. Creallon of Access easements.
No access easements are proposed or are needed for the 2 lot partition.
D. Street location,width.and grade.
The proposed partition will access existing streets. There are no new streets being
proposed or reconstructed as part of this application.
E. Minimum rights-of-way and street widths.
The applicant has proposed dedications to meet the minimum street widths for SW 90`n
Avenue and SW Lomita Avenue,though the applicant requests that staff review whether
a dedication of 12 feet is necessary for the flag driveway access onto SW Lomita Avenue
and that the property line can be matched with the existing property lines of the adjacent
neighbors. The adjacent properties are fully developed accessing the existing dead end
cul-de-sac with limited to no opportunity for the city or others to do future improvements,
and there is no need to expand the cul-de-sac or construct sidewalks around the cul-de-
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. 13
Repta Partition
sac since none currently exist along the road, so a dedication to 47' feet radius is not
necessary or warranted.
F. Future Street plan and extension of streets.
As stated previously,the area is fully developed out with existing streets and residential
homes. The proposed partition will retain an existing access on to SW 90`�'Avenue and a
new flag lot access onto SW Lomita Avenue. E�ibit A(Appendix A, "Plan")shows the
existing street system and the developed neighborhood. No future streets or extensions of
streets are needed or planned.
G. Street Spacing and Access management.
Please refer to Section 18.705 of this narrative which addresses street spacing and access
management.
H. Street alignment and connections.
There are no new streets proposed. The proposed partition will access the existing streets
abutting the property.
I. Not applicable.
K. Partial Street Improvements.
There are no partial road improvements proposed. The existing streets meet the
minimum pavement requirements for safe travel.
L. Cul-de-sac.
The existing cul-de-sac is greater than 200 feet long and along the main extension of the
cul-de-sac will have over 201ots accessing the cul-de-sac. The proposed partition is
utilizing an existing 15 foot flag frontage on the cul-de-sac which was originally designed
and approved as an access point onto the cul-de-sac for the property. The access point
for the additional lot onto the cul-de-sac is the most practical and logical point of access
for Parcel2 and should not create any impacts to the cul-de-sac or to SW Lomita Avenue.
The cul-de-sac meets minimum standards for turn around and emergency access so an
additional driveway onto the cul-de-sac should not be an issue.
M-AC.
The remaining street standards"M-AC"generally refer to larger developments
developing new streets. Please refer to other parts of this narrative andlor the attached
plans for the proposed two lot partition where applicable.
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. 14
Repta Partition
18.810.04 Blocks
The proposed partition will utilize eacisting public streets for accessing the property, and
no new streets or pedestrian connections are proposed. Because of the existing street
network and the fact that the local streets abut Hwy 217 a traditional perimeter block
measurement cannot be made and the existing residential development precludes the
establishment of a perimeter block of 20001ineal feet or any logical connections within
the existing block. Please refer to Exhibit A, (Appendix A,"Plans") showing the existing
residential streets block system for the property.
Because the proposed partition is only creating one additional lot or residential unit
accessing onto SW Lomita Avenue, and because the existing house will be kept it is not
feasible or practical to create a public connection through the property. Those that live
on SW Lomita Avenue can safely walk along the road to where SW Lomita Avenue and
SW 90"'Avenue intersect and those pedestrians can continue south toward Greenburg
Road, a primary collector or arterial.
18.810.050 Easements
There are no proposed easements for the partition.
18.810.050 Lots
A. Size and Shane
The proposed partition meets the lot size requirement for the residential zoning
district.
B. Lot fronta�e:
The parcels are being created by a partition and meet the requirements of
18.420.050 4c.
18.810.070 Sidewalks
A. Sidewalks.
No sidewalks are proposed for the partition. No sidewalks currently exist on either SW
90`h Avenue or SW Lomita Avenue and it would be impractical to construct sidewalks
that would serve little purpose or have any reasonable future connections to other
sidewalks. Construction of sidewalks along SW 90"'Avenue would create an island
sidewalk that would provide little use to the neighborhood and would be financially
detrimental to the owner.
B. Requirements of developers.
1. The proposed partition does not create an additional 1,000 vehicle trips.
2. There are no existing sidewalks on either side of the SW 90`h Avenue or
SW Lomita Avenue for all of the streets within and beyond 500 feet of
the property. As explained previously there is limited land available in
the vicinity for additional subdivisions or partitions that would create an
opportunity or need for sidewalks.
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. 15
Repta Partition
C. Planter strip rec�uirements.
No planter strips are proposed and none currently exist.
18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers
Sanitary sewer currently is provided to the property of SW Lomita Avenue and SW 90`�
Avenue. A sanitary sewer line connection will be provided to Parcel2 from SW Lomita
Avenue. Please see the attached plans showing the sewer connection.
18.810.100 Storm Drainage
Strom drainage currently is handled through a public system on SW Lomita Avenue and
SW 90`h Avenue. Strom drainage for the new home location and impervious area will be
picked up on the property and released into the system on SW Lomita Avenue.
18.810.120 Utilides
All future utilities to the partition lot(Parcel 2)will be placed underground and will be
constructed to city standards.
III. Impact Study
The applicant proposes a partition of a 27,000 sf lot zoned residential R-4 into two parcels for the
future development of a residential house on Parcel2. Parcel 1 will retain the existing structure
and shed. The following further addresses transportation and utility infrastructure impacts.
Transportation/Access: The property will have access via SW 90"'Avenue and SW Lomita
Avenue. SW 90`� Avenue will serve the existing house, no changes are proposed for the
existing house, driveway or frontage. A 2 foot dedication is proposed to meet the city's right-
of-way requirements on SW 90"' Avenue. A new 15 foot wide access driveway is proposed for
SW Lomita Avenue to serve the rear lot (Parcel 2). A driveway apron and curb will be added
and will be designed to transition with the neighboring driveways. A 12 foot dedication for
right-of-way for the access drive is proposed. The applicant requests review of this
requirement and requests a modification to match the property lines with the existing property
lines, a 12 foot dedication of the access driveway frontage onto the cul-de-sac is believed to be
unnecessary by the applicant. It would be better and more practical to match the property lines
with the existing neighboring property lines because the neighborhood around and along the
cul-de-sac is fully developed and the cul-de-sac and street meet current pavement widths.
The applicant is not proposing any frontage improvements along SW 90"' Avenue as was
explained in this application. The 2 lot partition does not warrant frontage improvements or
sidewalks in that no sidewalks currently exist along SW 90"' Avenue and the neighborhood is
fully developed precluding future development or redevelopment that may promote future street
improvements. Requiring frontage improvements including sidewalks that would serve little
public purpose would be excessive and an unnecessary expense and burden to the owner and
Campbell Plamiing and Development, Inc. 16
Repta Partition
applicant. Requiring a sidewalk in front of the house would require leveling out the sloped area
to match the street grade and would cause excessive sloping into the properties frontage.
The applicant requests an exception to frontage improvements along SW 90�' Avenue and would
agree to a non-remonstrance agreement not to challenge any future LID or city improvements
along SW 90`� Avenue or Lomita Avenue should they ever occur in the future - which in the
opinion of the applicant would be very unlikely.
Sewer: An 8 inch sanitary sewer line is located within SW Lomita Avenue providing adequate
capacity for the potential future residential development on the property. A 4' inch lateral is
proposed to connect the future development on Parcel 2.
Water: A 4 inch water line is located along SW Lomita Avenue which has adequate capacity
and pressure to serve the property. A 4 inch water line is also located within SW 90`� Avenue
which services the existing house. A fire hydrant is located within the right-of-way in front of
the house and was tested for flow and pressure. (See the attached water pressure tests,
Appendix F).
DrainaQe: New impervious service water from Parcel 2 will be collected on site and piped to
SW Lomita Avenue which will drain to a catch basin down SW Lomita Avenue where Lomita
turns and connects to SW 90`� Avenue. Please see the attached site plan for details on the
proposed connection.
Parks: The proposed partition will not have impacts to the City's park system.
Other Dry Utilities: Gas, electric and cable services are or can be made available to the
property.
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc. 1�
APPENDIX
A. Pfans
B. Pre-application Notes
C. Arborist's Report
D. Property Pictures
E. Clean Water Services Provider Letter
F. Water Flow Test
A. Plans
Exhibit A
Neighborhood Circulation/Street Plan
a, _ _ _--
. __ _
, _ -
..� _--
.
�� _ __ _i__
�. �.
MANZANITA �f
`�.. _ _
� _..__
,� _......... ;.__. .....__
_...._ _.......
_ , � __ ..
; `�,, --._
. __
--..._i s„ `°,.. ; i....._.....__........_.
i � , �._._._..—,._ _�, — ` � `a_ ,�, _ _
i i _ _._ ___...._
___ ,, ,j'�.�
, _._.....
,� �_ ��—_...—- �- �� �
�
, Ij i ;
t
�. ��
, ' __._
_---- ' �
� F,�
,. ;
i__ ,. ... � . .,.
. _`— ._ .`l, ..
� ' 1
� i '
�
� �
i 'i ! ; , ': I i � --__'�._....__,.
,� . . i .__._....._.
: . . i , ...._._
t
� �,: . � __.__7� .._...__.__ -__...__ ___.
�� „
` � I
i _...
i ' � A`n � ,1_._._ .._.....
1 � .
. � .� . .........
...� � � . ...,
; ,._._ ...._.____._j �'.. ��,.� . ,.,
� .......... . .
. ....._"_. - ..........__ .."' ; , .., .. ,..,
� .�
�
i
�--... .._.. � __ ; �,y `�,, __......__ i
_ _.. ........_ ,..ly�„ �.,
; ,
_.. �T
_... _..._ ___ .� _ _. , ", , � ____
_.......
�< � ��, �.
_..... ._.....�..._ �--- ' , �'`�,, �
_ _y �
! _........----..._-a � = o _ �.. , .,� E
;�. __ __'_ �� � • �� `�, � PFAFFLE �
_.......__ ._.._..._ ' �`''r.
----- = � _ �.l'L�i ��` '\' _
j , � .� �
� __ � :_ o •,,.
,....._ _. ..__ _._. � _.._ a,
� ,�,
___
� �_. � �
;.--- I — �
—,--.,._._ ,
,,
,___--.._ ..._.._..._._ : �_...1i � \ ` �`*"� �,,,
: . . , .._, l .. . C<. �,
—�
- __ �
� - ; �. �.�i � �.., �,
_._. --�--�^. -. .. --..._...__. .... , € 4
..__........____._... ,, ;.. � .'. .._,......_ '
�- f '�
; � � �
,
� ' � �"�,
.. .....--'--"f ' ! ., � .
, ..... . ._..__—_� '
f....'__. . .... � . .....3
i
_._..._.
�_�.... ' '_'_ "' '_ � h, z
. ..__. ..._.__ I ... .._
...,._ 'F _.._._ . � �_._" "_ .,1..
' ..
_-�_ .
� nw
..— ..__.i ' ��.
i � .... ....�
: : ..._ `____... ..._.. i . . .
t 1 �
. : .._......__.i _ .
i...
i �......` 1 - . -
.., I
' .'..' `. . . . �
. ..�1 . +" i . ._..._"'___-' _'_'___.—._..._.
y ..._.._._........_
� � ._....._._._. i .-_......_._ � .....
-�_ ..._ . ---� --
-».,... „ _•.,` ;_...__. � ;..._.._ : ..._...
.., ,.; .� .. •--T....__..._ .._-._ i --•
•,, f . __ - I ' ..._.-._-.a �
,
, ,
< , ,
, , , _............ i j .
� �ijQ � ._....--- .. -
, __. . .__....!
; I; : __....... . • _ _.. _ . ..
.
� .. ._._1 j I_. „_
._ :;;
� � .
......� ; � .
�
;
_T__ .... ;
t. �... , i , � � .,
- i ,;, ,
�, , �
�/ / ' ' , .
� � �
."'_'1! i i ............... .. A
i �
� � r
Ij i
i .
.�..... i ` � . : ... ...._
i i �.� �
i
i
�.
/ '.
� r . /
, ; . o --�..._
,, i ,--,
� _ .___ � ;
� : , ='� ��
�e —__-- ... ., �
.
; .,� � _._, � ,
, _. _ �_a ,. �
, �, ,
_ � ___r�
�- �,.: � i '
�n , � � ..._ ;
, ; . � -.
N � ___ � �: .
� ; ,� �
, , � , .
, , �
_ � � , � .
, r . .
� , ,
, , , ,
_... _- , . -
\ � � y;
' ..� � �
, ; � �.
- ...__.._{.......___.. -. � F�.._.. �` �. { �..
..... - �;, : ' �. . � ,: ��. � .�'"
� -_ � -� :: . . .� �s'r
� �� �`` �'�S�'Q' .. •.' , ;�� ���� ,,,,�"
: ,�.r. _. .i ,. � G� � ��GF.. �
, ., �
,. ,:.. . - •• rr
'� � �� �� � - �-
�
Feet
0 100 200 400
,;.
I ' ' � ��` .�� '
i
� _ ;;��; �ti, _—__.a.��cs � , - __ .� , '� _� .
� ,
,'� ' "� _
e
,
_... I .. _ .
� � � �� } �--� �. _.
, i _ _ S�R4' —'_._._' . �.y �l.�'R �;.:t7�1 ' Nwl OIY1�
k ,.1 ?{�7
�� � a i�� (�� i I`.. �� (- , \. �
� C� �! \ ., �� ' ' �'��'� "l� /ri rui._'W �r _ _ _� _;� _ �
1 ,� ^� 1�1`j � � - �' �.'i�a�nwo am � �� �
I � 4., �, , a;�i, „�� A� � � � �
i �
;j I � s.c"-'c; �, `t.�i�1' Z.�.,��I � ' � :��"L< '
i i I �`2.('..,s`' ,J,�.� '� I
I � \\i I! �� :o ` W=Mat -ra��
� I I..� ;; �: � L � -�,:��'�
n—� :� , \ , '
1
i . i�; � � .� �^ t.(:�S 1 a� I
� ,, � i -
i—�l'� .. � I ��i.� ,----� r _.�wi. _ J � � �� _
,.,..
�` � I _. _._—.—L—... _.._. � �
,� : ,,,�,���R�n,b,�`-
�� ��� � � I 1 I I � I i,�� --_1 wa„
i t o - .� L:.� .....-- -...._. n� �F L� �'•�.I
I ' � r�/ �
• r ,�--.., b a��`,`' :;�.� I �"" -.._..._---....---. .-._. � � I Z>f:�1 1 '. �� NCRNT/MAP
S. � � i I � �1�� '� � � �' I � �s�ra� � %c�� `s�� �E wn
�._ I..� .� I i � 1 '
�.._.�. `..� i I_..._ ..__---�- ! P�ARf�l 1 i i �-._.__.. -}---.'- _ '/���!�'F_` ARCEL 2 ������� �
� P_
�
� I �1 � � ' � .�� ._�I I �t
_ -_
� _.. ��
a�na xaR ; � �
.
I �I �1 I I�.r� -�5 � � A�..� � � �1.� � Ns I i _._ I
r� '; �
� V {t.0?M>�F' � �' I' I � �� ��.^ ��t0 rwn[ .....'_ -..... � I
I . '... ', i � '' ___ I
I ° ,�� �' / i � , � � `�
,
� } � i�. �; �_ _ _.__i � � � �� �;��� � � , _, �
�, � � e�.��„�g"5'�rl?j�'.`�4'��y� ! �I r���'-'�-r� �nca oa+r�iureaa J �i_� L,r.,':� �^x �l I I � li
_ �� .. -�.�",. - � �"' f � i e; � �'3�, � ' ( I
� " `'r-1'� -��'- ---1--..__�c_....__.�_...—.._.._. �`-. ,-�_ ; � I
_. -
. _ -..._...
�- __..__`.�t'�r '
I I. � I �� T.�s'_-5 ! � � � �
� ' � 0 q !D �
I . rir �
' I � 1� . ,... r�', �� � � � ;�`��'� ,; � � �� ; ,
�
. iim,..�,. 1 , il �. —.5,. _._ _. �' � ._.._� �� �
� i _I_� ! i i _ � _---- - _ �—— . _ •........., 1 __ __I—J
, __ ` �
., � a
i i� �� ��\ �_..`-�. � ��i i„V'.,r� _ . � �._?���lC � —r,,,�-_3� -- -1 �hl
'�. � . 11 �-- =... J L, , .,•i 1 � �- � �.._ �.: .. .._.._.._.._ �i
' - -�- -' - - - -'-'-�-�-� -
�� � �
i � ���>;;` �j ��^� I i��; � �--- ""°" - -----s=--- -- 6��'°'"r._
1 ' �_����������_��� __�.� J� _ ------
, � ....,r. mx u_. r ,��<- ..,., �
.�
.
I � � � s� `� �,.,��',.�.,� �.� ��, I
� � —
i I _ __ _ _ s{� ; \
� : ��� �
.;
; ` \\ j .
� � � �� `
o���m� � , � �
Da n�no�oi/ov.u aina� af�aa imr mi R nvm m nw � h �,'��I � ir-;
D04IN0�PFAMOUS AIEA�4975 g O mm��[idam _ nimceroi��� ����nvem u[�� ` �, �! �
IEW NIVENNOUS AIEA�7.Y7S SF a menu.�ro�[�u�T ono�� � �
aai m ww io�wo mar �� -nnroo siar oaw � �
��r�'.y., I
pQ r nw rvn,Mr a+a uma ��., `�'` ----�oeo wrrwe a+a �
m�r m�n�rwwu� i � �`.3"L�� - -nva�Mm�wa \
���2 .� o�ncn�oer mi wo�m�a rwa �� .
Q 1'�1101�1Ni TN YI O�IM IMM ♦ ..r l�/ Ut�Y[Wq9�K N lAOlf IOIQ RVO�/O�9tM7171 -
�/irMl Lr M1EI I<O NO t'�IHS U[ _• I ��.
j �
„1w .
�i /�fML uEl a101 nrl 7REE PROIECIION y�,�V` i ',
rua�m ww io snar (������ /'�\ _ � � 1 �. � �:
�L4`�]li�� � � �,���� 1@ A t 16101� ..� I II ' .
4W6T�'110�YINI -
Q 1�7�TM�a11�1�M�dl �n `� J� 1 ......... � :
�
�MlhYl r�Oa al�l � .
�iwrr mwN w�awrx sw� REPTA 97E 0/10/OE
��� vwsnE nErrA �o
�������*�� � TRT ENGINEERING.INC. ���P� 1
•r a r�aw r�o�nsir mar na
�wnu raa wo n�rt�s+wo naan uc �_.�_i se TCAItD,oREOOn YT22JE (
�tas ,�.�o�ca'.i"E
Q ie�ae�a s�na�:rm ro e n •K p„� . ,•
m�a�o�r aa�mu.ma .�� mw�:: ��m.,�ia+.",�i"'9n SIIE PLAN/PARTIiION 10ai.�in
I
� . � ........ � .'r. ------se93roo�,«_—�—�---h - ----�- --r,� _.__—.__J—.,:��_..._..._.� - .a.e.anmwoa
'__ ..�<} .1 . . .� i � ;� ._ � w�..r.
� � � — —�— — ---�—�— —�—�— Y , .,. � ��.v :r.�r i�� e�w�iwrar�ia.r�r.rr�.�ii.r.�.
r �� a �i � n
�T1Y4� �,. c � �P. x3 ( ..' '
I � � I F � � E L 11�1��1�I O�OC W��wY�lb�wrM�rr �M M��
�� � �1���� `'�' • f r� � � li b � (' E wwl b�M Y�`MYiWa�p~wwY�UY�MM Y�Yiwi��Y w
' 1 I �� ,�>✓" .,,.:.�.' . ',,^�,.O�NY!m — _ A�rN t nM�wwr N M M�?al� .r w�w.r...r�
• `� Y�' � .l 'l 5. C j A IdNI � „� �.— —.� � ] 1M Miwrr M M S��e�w M M�Y M i�b w1r M N�W Iti r
. � . > (' < . . O�M M�rY4 M M�NrM�Y M wM��Y M I�MIK
�� 1t1 I 5 � t `;.ai��M', `t ' ?' 3I' ' 1 1��r1Y��Y Y YW�/Y�b�/YW ir Y Yww I���ra
-� ".�°" ' � �' � ��`��-:•,, p a n.m/.r.ww�w wr r�ww w wr.aw r..1�.�r�+�.r�r
: 1i � ��
� �� � ���� o rn�a � �r.r.�r
' I ,! : .�.. :z. � �`. ;. r' Si � . .......__ p�� m .r�..r
��aa w r.�..��r ti.ww
S � �r �+�aw.�wra► rs.r we+r..�r.�.rrr
I � g�� � i s n. wr.r.�.�rr rr...r..�A+.rw r.�.w r..w..
� . C. j t��,,,1'; �w.w.r.�r w..ae mw.wr r�� �r r...�.rr
: I ` j�, .'.�% I �.. 1�� q g� I �' M i wr�MA�t w/�w!IW���(��I lw M b
; i � ` .; - �/��:� � a n.m r.�r Mr w�.ri.w we�b M.wrnl/�.��r r mr�r•..�r
� �� .,, i , ,� �� J i ,"�"3 ..,....,._,..r�..rr�
. I � ,.,�,;y Ir � . . .. r.�. r. _. . "�i
�_
��'/'t. Iwl I ....__... ....._,._ ........_� . ..� .._,.._...� . N B 9 5)0 0'E 2 B�B I ��7 , I� 7. M N����!V�wd Y YMb M'11L M�IIM MMlI��M!Y
�� I�1 � � < ': , P�fiR1RFi�iFi- . / � �����M Y A�r�la
I � ' 1 I � it-� � ' ,,.� � l '� �wrr�w.��wry�, �M M Mi���t M M��Y^y�Y4MM k�
. � �:_'N IL f�^1,.3 � t ':: . __....."_"_ .....__ — . I �1 . �� � �Y % �! �Yw M M�ii M r� �r�+r�r.wr� .�..tie
I I'�.+ .:i I {..-'.�._... _ �......_._. '.. `'I `�i
�: . I� . I I; ��„ . � : I `�� a fw�I�MM��R�Y w�w Y M MMr1Y M MYwrl�M�w e w�Y Y�
� : i i�;.!C�a� I � d:� � � ;h,^, � '� �.n.��w�r.�..�..,�.�a.�r.
� i � I � PARCEL 7 : i �Q �t ..i.S j iI n. r�a��r w ..�r.r.��.+�i r�w Mw w..r.wr�
� .. J.� �� ISM]S ..; � _.._ ..._.._ �/ ti ■M w�!�i��rt WYr f�w O�Y��Nt NAy�Y wl
P 4
�.... ...... ' __.....I. t•• ._.... � ... � 10.W� `� .���}i� wM���n A�11�w��i M�AeI.fr M b�r 11w�1Y�~M Wa O,M�
1 E_.T... . � ...__. _ . .j; � i ���� - q nwp�r u�w r�r 1��.A r��
�' � j � � asw� I - ��I��"\ �I � ta w.�.Mr�..m.��r.�.�r.►�a rrrr
I I I�'�� � �i A�,.� � �-, I I � � ��
� a �,
. � , ,: _ _
� � , ,�,<-� � � � 1 � �� t , , � ��,�,E,.,�� � �� ,
, _.
I . i.� �< �„�, I{ I
v } � I � i
I 8„�� I � '-��j� F I �j I° ���i�s�� I i I . I I
' � I �'��'r{�r���R>�',.��...-- - � , J� - � "°'��,�«�.,b».�,.o -�-k„ u , ' � �
,� , 4:_=. � �'���z �_l—....__.� ._: � ' _ < ' � � �
.
a I
� ,,, , �--......... � 8 i _ f }I � �.�..
, _.
�._ ,`� r,_� r.s.� � �I r , ;���
� + � � T'� � j i �: ;=.� � � � �
� t I � �o..o a,a„ � � �- _. � � T_—�— — - ��_ _ _��� __ � I
; � � ' �� __ " . . � .,�'���
� �} _ � ` -------- =---
, i , _ � �
I , . � i ____� �' � -_ ._ ,�+",�_ _..„-,:.._.._ _ ,
-'� ,, � __ � ./„,� � `� � �
II �' ��l �:.\ � ..�.._.._M as�p
. .. ..... ..�
i i . L=_..__:_"_�—._-:_.—.—.—.— ._.J �_ _� -� � � j ,¢,";.:��� ~�� ——J�tll� — _ _—�` oHwi � :
. � I�+I— S r Sr ` � � . ..` �
.. ' I -_—�� ` .: .. �. �_ .
� � ' s eu�se��•c �. ' . ,.». _ S �.���_F ' .
�, im_er �:i..na u�.ea' _ _ ' • �� .
.` � IIRML�Ort IOI¢ � \�;
''�. ��' � � _......_... ... ..._....._...... I ��1 )�t tiY.:�� �\ I
/
OM y�/ \
. ,_.,,. _ ...... ..... . ....,,._,,..... ....._.............. . ... . \ .
� /a1a✓.' � �
}y.,.. ...F � 1� ��.,.....� , .._. :1
. �� .....,,._, j ' \
,,,'d�'"' � ., � � i ��
, � - ��a',r= , ��' �-�,..�..�..n"''° . •, `
��� � \ �
. r�"�'����` �;,.�`"'�• .���
r�" � \ �`�
ww..c":�,. _.. +'� ; .., aeesn
/...�' ..,._,;,,..., ,..,�.. �� � - � m . \ ��� �'�.
�...L-.-,..-.... { �.3 ! _ � . '�.'4'' .«,»MR.,.�- , �i� � .
�� � _ �,::.... \1 '�
,, e
� a �
�s� �� ,z.,r,�. ���� ��_�«.�.�u ` � �� ' �� �
.. ,.,
�.�W:.
, E � , �
�:w _ ��,�...� � .t�.:- � , : ��
r� ��
.�.. ,,-�.�- , ,
..2"""" . .:«.EY...a...., ��q'"� ., .. � �rOO�tt u��' « ..N �. REPTA FR090N 6/10/OE
a.e.`�. . e <.
C� _'_' °
,. ..._..... . --..,.,. ,.�m.,�,._ ....._ ..._. _____.�
� � _._
€C�Q�Tr,Ct'ww artiR�a..� � VASILE REPU s��Nn
��ane. ��. �.r-: . OwJ�r�Sw+�a�x '�. � TRT ENGINEERING.INC. ��P'�� n
.....>�,.. . .�..� .. 11100 S1Y YOTH AVF?IUE
.._"'.._. , _ _r, � L
__— �,�r •� �E� ncam.aracaH a�zaa
.. a �..a.��.... o„�^
. . __�_.. .. � . .. ..... --. . �af ° «.w�.� �.
�[� o�� MR EROSION CONTROL PLAN ���
TRBE 1dAP
A TRAC�OF LAND
N SRIM7ED IN 7FE SE 1/4, SECIION 35.T.1S., R.7W., W.M.
� CrtY OF TlfillR�.COUNPf OF tYASHINOTON. STAIE OF OREOON
w �zooe
s I
1Y E Z I s4-�ve O
S -�oar mamcmM ao�c
S �� "PN 1993-013" x '""E"0101�"`
��• W I 2s•Co1NfD1 �'�� YC CoNiER / \
LOT 2 n �p�m
� �w� -coNi .2
0 20 I
]0'
I CONFiA
J!'f70MFDl
( n 3 0 65 0'0
o s. � n
p� M s�o o-
o H D
i s,• aaus ��•� oocouous r
„- a o
r o
�o
e.� T
� I � 13'COIiR
� DECK ~
C! „• n 3000
c n � .23 AC
s y� � 7� 1J'OECOUOIIS p O Q
` Y M�
� � HOUSE W ir ^o
� 24'OECdlOUS 0 Z
b
� I °N
� I � � ASPHALT
o P� Y
d o � � 51'34'4 ' 7.32'
x' � I I �PHALT DRIVE � 1z•°��� 5 9'17' " 61.07'
E'' [) to'oodouois "
O ...
Q� I I N � L=10.81' w �
� S89'S8'11'E 254.7 �
V� I
occiouous
I �a•oECwa�s
�
RECSfERm I LOT 1 �LOMI'PA� LOT 2
PROFESSq►NL
I �
ORECON ( �i
JULY 18 1N0
JOE H. f�'RCUSON I E
1M6 ~
NORMNL M7E 1 ]1 �
1 C[71IFT 1lNT 7!6 IMP W�4�IIEP I �
IA�O M PROp/LT/61NM I 1�
ON MII-1l14/lY
g � cue►rt: v��c wcrr� Fergvaon Land Surve,ytna, Ina sr�crr no. � ov �
I 11100 3E YOTH AVE 616 SE 106TN AVE. PORTLAND, OR 47416 � M�• �-���
nwu�o. o�aooN n,e�,. (soa) 4oe—oeo� rax (soa) soe—oeot ourrEU z».os w�
C . Arborist's Report
11400 S W 90�' Ave. 5/2/2008
Tree Plan Report
for 11400 SW 90th Ave.
T1zis Tree Plan, written for Mr. Vasile Repta, pertains to 11400 SW 90`}' Ave., Tigard,
Oregon. The property will be divided into two parcels. As directed by Chapter 18.790 of
the City of Tigard Municipal Code, the health, removal, protection, and mitigation of
trees are addressed. There are twenty-six trees on the subject property, where "tree"
means a standing woody plant, or group of such, having a trunk that is 6 inches in
diameter at breast height(DBH)or larger. These are shown on the attached site plan,
made by others. There are also three trees of interest that are shared or on neighboring lots
(T87, T89, T90)and one tree that is less than 6 inches DBH (T69). All thirty trees are
described in the attached Tree Table. The following species are present:
Apple (Malus sp.)
Cherry(Prunus sp.)
Douglas-fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii)
English walnut(Juglans regia)
Fig (Ficus sp.)
Flowering dogwood (Cornus florida)
Golden chain (Laburnum ana�,ryroides)
Hawthorn(Crataegus sp.)
Peaz(Pyrus sp.)
Pissard plum(Prunus cerasifera)
Plum{Prunus sp.)
Red oak (Quercus rubrum)
Silver birch(Betula pendula)
Tree Removal
The owner proposes to remove only four trees at this time, T74, T75, T83 and T84. These
are marked on the Site Plan with X's. Only one of these trees is larger than 12 inches
DBH. There are seven trees latger than 12 inches DBH on the property, so the retention
rate for large trees is 86%. According to Chapter18.790.030.B.2.d. no mitigation is
required.
Tree Preservation
Six trees larger than 12 inches in caliper will be preserved, and these require protection
from construction damage. The condition of some of the trees is problematic, as noted in
the Tree Table. The owner has decided to retain them, and root protection zones (RPZs)
Multnomah Tree Experts, Ltd. �
11400 SW 90`"Ave. S/2/2008
are given as feet of radius in the Tree Table. RPZs and the associated tree protection
fences are described in detail below.
Because no construction activity will occur on Parcel 1,tree protection fences will not
be necessary for T64, T65, T66 and T68.
There are several Douglas-fir trees in the neighboring lot to the north. T87 and
associated trees to the west do not require protection because no construction activity
will occux on Parcel 1.
Neighboring Douglas-fir trees to the east of T87 will be protected by keeping a 10 ft.
setback from the property lines.
Trees 89 and 90 are either growing on the Lot to the south or on the property line. A 6
ft. RPZ is adequate for these trees. The proposed driveway will be approximately 6 ft.
away. I recommend placing a short section of tree protection fencing at that distance
to avoid damage and potential problems with a neighbor.
I recommend an 8 ft. RPZ with a full tree protection fence for T82. Due to its small
size, this is voluntary.
T80 and T81 are fully regulated trees and tree protection fences must be built around
them. Because both trees have been severely topped, their RPZs are smaller than
usual.
The remaining trees on Parcel2 are below the regulated size. No construction activity
is planned nearby, but a tree protection fence at the suggested wouid help to keep
them viable.
If any trees are illegally removed prior to or during construction, a violation of the City's
Development Code will result. The applicant acknowledges that the development code
provides for the following penalties if the trees on site are damaged or removed:
"Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, any party found to be in violation of
this chapter pursuant to Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be subject to a
civil penalty of up to $500 and shall be required to remedy any damage caused by the
violation. Such remediation shall include, but not be limited to,the following:
A. Replacement of unlawfuliy damaged or removed trees in accordance with Section
18.790.060 (D) of the Tigard Development Code; and
B. Payment of a additional civil penalty representing the estimated value of any
unlawfully removed or damaged tree, as determined using the most current
international Society of Arboriculture's Guide for Plant Appraisal,"
Multnomah Tree Experts, Ltd. �
11400 SW 90th Ave. 5/2/2008
Root Protection Zones
All trees selected for mandatory preservation will be fenced off at the edge of the Root
Protection Zone, or RPZ. The drip lines of the trees are an estimate of the soil axea that
should be included. The final size and shape of individual root protection zones will be
based on root habit and other site factors, so the exact fence locations can be determined
by the project arborist in the field. The radii in the Tree Table should be used initially,
and indicated on the site plan.
The general contractor and the project arbarist will meet at the site before work begins to
mark the construction fence locations. Unless otherwise noted, all tree protection fencing
will be installed befare construction starts, and kept in place until construction is
complete. Once the fences are installed, the owner must request inspection and approval
by the City Forester before any additiona� work is performed.
City Code requires that fences be 6 ft. high orange plastic mesh secured to 8 ft. metal
posts in the ground, or 6 ft. high steel fencing on concrete blocks. I recommend the metal
fencing. Once installed and approved, tree protection fences may not be opened or
removed unless directed by a qualified arborist. "Qualified arborist" can include the
project arborist, City Forester, or any ISA Certified Arborist or ASCA Registered
Consulting Arborist who is familiar with this tree protection plan.
Root protection zones may be entered only for tasks like surveying, measuring, and
sampling without supervision by a qualified arborist. Upon completion of these tasks, the
fence must be closed. Without written authorization,none of the following will occur
within the root protection zones:
1. New buildings;
2. Grade change or cut and fill, during or after construction;
3. New impervious surfaces;
4. Utility trench alignments;
5. Drainage field placement;
5. Staging or storage of materials and equipment during construction;
6. Vehicle maneuvering areas during construction.
Conclusion
This document satisfies the Tree Plan Requirement (Chapter 18.790.030)for the City of
Tigard. It delineates the trees on the site, the exemptions, the trees being removed, and
those being protected. Protection measures are described for trees that are in the
mandatory preservation category.
ultnomah ree Experts, Ltd. 3
11400 SW 90t" Ave. 5/2/2008
No tree can be removed without consent of the land owner. The goal of this Tree
Preservation Plan is to protect trees according to the City of Tigard Development Code,
and to observe all laws, rules, and regulations. It is the client's responsibility to
implement this Tree Protection Plan fully,and to monitor the construction process. We
recommend a preconstruction meeting with the owner,contractors,and the project
arborist. Given reasonable notice,a qualified arborist from Multnomah Tree Experts, Ltd.
will be available throughout the construction process to help with tree-related problems.
Deviations from
This Tree Protection Plan can result in tree damage, violations of the City code, and civil
penalties.
Assumptions and Limiting Conditions
Multnomah Tree Experts, Ltd. 8325 SW 42nd Ave. Portland, OR 97219
Voice (503)452-8160 Fax (503)452-2921 torrespt@aracnet.com
1. Any legal description provided to the consultant is assumed to be correct. Titles
and ownerships to property are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is
assumed for matters legal in character.
2. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data have
been verified insofar as feasible; however,the consultant can neither guarantee nor be
responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others.
3. The consultant shall not be required to give testimony or attend court by reason of
this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including additivnal
fees.
4. This report and any values expressed herein represent the opinion of the
consultant, and the consultant's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a
specified value, a stipulated result,the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any
finding to be reported.
5. Sketches, drawings and photographs in this report are intended as visual aids and
are probably not to scale. The reproduction of information generated by other consultants
is for coordination and ease of reference. Inclusion of such information does not
constitute a representation by the consulting arboris#, or by Multnomah Tree Experts,
Ltd., as to the sufficiency or accuracy of the information.
6. Unless expressed otherwise, information in this report covers only items that were
examined, and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection. The
Multnomah Tree Experts, Ltd. 4
11400 SW 90'�Ave. 5/2/2008
7. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or
deficiencies of the plants or property in question may not arise in the future.
8. This report is the connpleted work product. Any additional wark, including
production af a site plaa, adde�da and revisions, construdion of tree protection measures,
tree work, or inspection of tree protection measures, for example, must be contracted
sepazateiy.
9. Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report.
la. CCB# 154349 ISA Certified A�orist PN-O650 ASCA RCA No.372
�,,�t,� � �n,.-�.o
Peter Torres, M.F,
Multnomah Tree Experts, Ltd. 5
11400 SW 90th Ave. Tree Table 5/�2/2008
No. Common Name Parcel DBH Condition Action Comment R�Z
fi1 apple 9 11 cropped for fruit none viable 8
62 apple 1 8 cropped for fruit none viable 6
63 a ple 1 7 loose in round none roblematic tree 6
64 cherry 1 26 top ed at 15 ft. none roblematic tree 16
65 cherry 1 19 topped at 15 ft. none roblematic tree 14
66 cherry 1 18 stem deca none roblematic tree 14
67 plum 1 S loose in round none not viable 6
68 Douglas-fir 1 19 topped at 25 ft. none roblematic tree 16
69 Laburrnum sp. 1 5 foose in round none not viable 6
70 flowering dogwood 1 8 viable none none 8
71 lum 1 7 viable none none 6
72 plum 1 7 trunk deca none roblematic tree 6
73 cher 1 11 trunk and stem deca none add to m - roblematic tree 8
74 fig 2 12 trunk and stem decay remove remove for construction 0
75 fig 2 13 viable remove remove for construction 0
76 fig 1 6,6,6 viable none 11 inch DBH e uivalent 8
77 plum 2 8 branches are cracking none could be runed 6
78 silver birch 2 8,9 to ped at 15 ft. with trunk deca none roblematic tree; 12 inch uivalent 8
79 silver birch 2 5,7 to ed at 15 ft. with trunk deca none roblematic tree; 8 inch e uivalent 8
80 Douglas-fir 2 13 to ped at 15 ft. none over 50% removed- robfematic tree 10
81 red aak 2 18 to ped at 15 ft. none over 50% removed- roblematic tree 12
82 appte 2 12 cropped for fruit none viable 8
83 pear 2 8 cropped for fruit remove remove for construction 0
84 plum 2 12 basal deca remove remove for construction 0
85 plum 2 6 loose in round none add to ma 6
86 lum 1 8 trunk deca remove add to ma 6
87 Douglas-fir off site 34 off site none nei hbor's tree 24
88 En lish walnut ROW 10 �ninor trunk deca remove ri ht-of-wa tree 8
89 hawthorn o�f site 10 off site none nei hbor's tree or shared 6
90 Pissard ptum off site 12 off site none nei hbor's tree or shared 6
Summa There are seven trees over 12 inches DBH. One is being removed.
Retention Rate 80%
Miti ation Pa ment $0.00 RPZ means Root Protection Zone, a radius measured in feet around the tree.
Fieid work done 4/16/08 by Ryan Neumann, ISA PN55539A Multnomah Tree Experts, Ltd.
D . Property Pictures
Site Pictures
Picture 1: Shows frontage of property along SW 90th Avenue.
i � �� �,� ��- . W r,�,
�F
, ", �,^� ,t''�y'��� + -� � ���`+�
3 ��yp,'r�'.'p�v
f+h ���i� �S
Y 1 YJ..�,•a '��r {r k4 ��'r
�.. . 'h�' � ���'� ''?�l S A . �i y y _
- � nL �.ra" '`�'"I ti �A.'` ?
��'�i.✓ N >. ly,� c i } � c,,
��� PF � t�� {��sL� ����. �� •�
:k. '-07�i:�,9� ��� .M.�• J7'�Y� '„�HA.�y �,/�I��Y j�b ,
. . ea3'4y�s, ���'.'a�; �!r�f�yve�. �..���'nb.. �c N`�•*"'"° .�
.n . � A{�e'r 4�{�y�!('" j� '� 4��t:'r -
. � . . , ¢ .{l 'Y�!` �'�.r �x:7. ..,': y � '4
� 4^ �� ,��pe fiy� wf- } .
�# b< ' w"w'..r 1 "P.U✓1�.r �,y�� ,
� � . �5u. .," ��„� +°tt�.L N� ,r �..iir� -.:Y� .
W7 ''e� � aa f,. � .T.j„
a �+ g ;,
���.�;�•,� . ;'�� +r.,�„ ,''�� �. � ��� �'.�• 1 -SF .:^, a��i� �"i.q�"'f?� .
:�,tr ""` �j '� . �_r2���' ) t 1�. }" .
�:. �1 .�-�� ",sj`,.,�Lr�T �
�# s � � •�P;>���r��'�,``�`��4°'a� ,$ `�d -
,_�� ��,
_ — ��• ' ,, �.: .y'�r-•
- �- � ~
- 1�-� '�:
K:•:.,.. �
� -���� .4"',.., o
�; �
. . Lr,���. . . _ . — . . . . :w:.�i
Picture 2: Shows driveway to existing house.
��;;r ���, � =r :�
� ��� ; '�� ���:fJ
L
� . 3V �f:.Y . t�`� !``' �j
��� .4S"' � Y� Y ..M A.i �7"�S2""�
. � Y;� Y 5�_; . �"' �y
a S �� �.' ` +�_ '��� ��:�'�1
�i.:...- ..ay. •�' 'st' .. �k. : _�y.
` f�r r� � �� ��r ..
� �.�..y � � �=�:. :.� �' ._ ��tS2�,
... . - ",�_' '+, ;i e. . .._ >- _ �:� � r�}+
\\` �
�
� ' � `c:i' W L
. ' . . =�,'' , �- � ' 1
.�!'.'• ' .. f ..�� `� „�d-. .lt�.s i!� ���
4
y��A?� . h`}�,A '� �'� ,.. .�` . . . _ '�� �
sw
n 4.�..
�
�r� �1 `:R��"�., �'��, ���`:�
1}`;�� 1;�a1l�' .:'�q � _ '�'„�..:
;:�i r�K� y�.'F ��� '� �y]�, .�' j`a F�:�
�'��A*y� '�`�S�� � .. " 9 r ���:•Y
��')/ �� `'�' .
iF� �
{ ,.�a^ �?�
:�! �,,,,, m�
��, ..:;y.1'�:.. �._� ,�:�-i,
z t' ��
- �. {p.!�+:
'�=.:t ,' "�
Picture 3: Shows flag lot access location onto SW Lomita Avenue
�:��..-�._� �� �
�
. - '��-Y �,
.r. ,- .
� -
,� ; �,. �
. ,� ;� �
��� ��a : .
-- .� _ � ' + r: �
� �,:.: . a,
•, ' 1r'1 a1 y,�y ,Y !, _:i'�
— — --�'� . . ' . r'��, p R 3 .., �
. .._ ' �) +i �•' :
_ q . � .. ssr ��,,,,�°ar- t ti 4� � :'4
� ����j�y} ~ :� ' �
� �
� `:� � �4�.,Fi T�t1.. M1 ' �
� t �j g' �!� � .T Nr� ':t' -�
'I'�` t: ," � !� .�r.�. rGr,
� I�-_. ,?. t' '{ �r 4�� _
� .. .t... ' -__._ ..'_' ".' ��
. . ... .. � >iT� . .n..-H
' �._ .���j . - .. ��.ey�yy. .
!! . � •
Picture 4: Shows access drive location for flag lot
r
�v � ,��, l�,;��A
; � a. ,,
_�;� � �� , i.
� � \� '
,, , . :
: . , �
't �. � � ' ,
— i � � �- y�
_ _ , 4s,�^ �,�' � +�i v'� _
_ — �'� ;;�d�. °::t .�°*';,-�,Sy- '�
J'
- — N. � �t� � � o-�� ���tii�' ���'i`� * � �. �-.
-- - � � � � w��° � I I - x
_ __ _ �.� .. �F,', i -<.,,F
�
,;,M
I '�II b.''� �
��r .. ... . .. .
.. x
� .. . I
�
V',-• 1 '� "' 1 �'.!M'.+ill
:,.� . �"��..,�5� "
� _� :�'s� ' .1
- -e.��i"� a ...
� r i�rs � .
I � � � tr M
��^�mssir� �C'.�, �`� eu, �r'�-.
t I.� .�5 �.
... .- .. ' � . . 4 .�� .'i..;.
1 �
. �� ��!�•� .
,.. - - - . _ � r, ,w�cw�� "r�.�pf�.
r-r✓� '4..�d� -,w�'•.r L..- . OI��
_ . -. . _.....wW��...M��'�� � ' ' __ �o,
' � � ��
, . „. : ,: .. . -
r��c � �^a� a ' g�.
�' � � .,...-
x���J ��
'z +..'
' • - • • � • •.•
/ y . ..
�?.�: Ii �..�.f � `� a
�=' ,.
�W.. �..,.�r. �Y�, . '?
' K" ,
:�- • �:�
` f�� �'7�. ' � ,,i
_�.. ;.
- a' '
•.�� - . . . ,�. . '
��,j �
�,i �. . 1, r tls . . .. .-
e��w�: f . . -..
� .. . �:a . ''�� a
.: A ., 1
r
i
,._ �?� $.:- m.R..... „r� .�:
,
.c __ �_•_„= a
i;
;��.. ,; ,, . ;
F ..
,. ._u �,� �
� � � �. � � • ' 1 �. 1 � ' �
1 �' � '�
t w . �'` .� � 71 ,��� �k ,''�V. ,r �,y �4 } , .
.� .� :,'*3' � 1' .: �"�" ' � �.
� '• � .�� ,� ' ', � + �s.
, .,.r , `f
. ` , r .� � :•�'ry� , •X,,�*� ,��:.� . _
.' .. .4'Y. �n ,,Y. ��. � '�v , >' ' _-,� , .
� � �i► '�.y� r
, �� �,�; �4' �� � -r i r r.� yi w" -
R � ..'`! �.r. ��.� ,�y f":�' '�.. . '�_
_�e � � -
� �r..M '; � ���'�-, � �. � . ' �,` , - .
' , � . . i ' o,
t � -.°�'�1�� y. .f ��F4x��� -" �• '� ,,. "
.a, �''
� ' � ,1• . �. ' . . '. , - .. , ,
_ ,i .
� �
u
. �-� ' � � � / � .
, ' � . . ' . . � � . . .
E . Clean Water Services
Provider Letter
APA,pp r� 21. 20085 3: O1 PM ----_ No, 5351�ez•P. l�oz �003
r L� V r. ''i I'' 1
� I� O ��Jt�
���� � �
L APR 1 � �uu�
����n1��t�r . �'� �rv�.�5 ��
� 4ui�arn�„t��rt!o�ie�r.t E3y.^_—,� _ CWS FI(�NunlUci
`"Sensi�Ive.A�ea Pre-Sct'eenlne � U -C� 10�$
Site Assessment
Jurisdlction:�1�,�¢f(Q
Prop9rty Infornletlon: (o�rr��prs lS23aaBoia00) Owner Information:
Taxlol tD(s): . �� /J. c:u_ �al� Name:_.1C�LL� Qe°Tct
-�^--, . ,_ Compahy; � ,
___ AdGress:�_�/oo S�J���.
SileAddress: �{p0 w. � �G� �
— . , PhonelFax' / �
NARr�t Cros�Slr@dt:S �,�J G o�„r,Ta �ri� �E-ma�l: � � �
bevelopment Activi2y: CheCk all that apply �
Addltlon to Sinple Famlly Recldenoa (rooms, dack, ga�age) p Applicant Inlormbtion�
Lc►t l.ine Ad�ustmenl � Name:_ Ou C'��,� L/
1 ❑ Minor Land Parlltlon ���.�,�� • --
Residpntlal Condominium ❑ Commercia�Condomin►um p CO"'pany:����, la•.,n-i��Js►�-.
RAefdentlpl SubQivlalon Add►ess: �?,��� S c� s���
❑ Commeroi�l Subalv�elon /I� O 2 Z --
Singie L6t Commercial ❑ Multl Lot Gommercfal a — ��— � - -
Other � d ph�ne/Fax:50�•1�� `�y4�L� �o j_2�7- 3 S 3 7
--�- •- . ._ .E-maih�C�4� ,�pD_�eYLicd��Z, �
Wil�1he project involve any oN-sttv work: YES❑ NO� Unknown � Locstlon and dsscriptl011 of oft-sito work:
addttlonpl comments or information that may be need�d to�underatnnd your project: �� � jp�y ,
r rti: `t u T� �Qc�.c�, � ' • -�,�
Thl��ppNoAqon dow NOT��pl0es t�e n�ed for Ofading nnd EfoiiOn Control p��i1s,Connectlon Parmi�s,eulldfnp Permlts,Slto avelopm�nt
Perml�s,DE(1�zoo-C Porm�c or otner p•rmas as t�sueQ by�ha Dep�rtment oi Envlroom�nlil Quelily,Dbpiftms�t ot Stala LanAs�nQlvt Oaparttrtoni of
the Army COE. AI�rsQuired perml��d approvpls must ba a6ta�nod.artd campleted Und�r appll(�p(p IOCaI,etatf,�Ind(�d�rat�sw.
. By�Ipnlny Ihla fOm�,.lho Own�r pr pWMr's aulhqrqed a�anl or reprcsenia��e,ecknowkdgos and egrees iha�omployees of Clean WeUr6AMaa ha�e nu�Ao�[y
fo•nt•r W�proJecY.l�.it ell ro�loonaWe dmcs for Ih�purpoa�ol fnspvollnp pr�eJvCt Ylua opndition+and pathering int�rma6on related rn the qvject sue. I a,Nfy
that i am famili:v wtth the iniorni�llon oonyMed In thl�dooumenl,anE to Iht best of my knowledpi w�d b�li�f,lAi�Inforrnauon is�n,e,complets,and�tCU/alo.
Print/Type Name� � �� ��� _Print/7ype 7111e:
Signalure: ' ' � � ' Date: '�� /4�'�O�'sy
I� � � FoR oisTRlcT us� ON Y ' � �r
L.� $An�ltive er�ae potantlally exlst on'slte or withln 200'of tha slte. E APPtI ANT MU9T PERFORM A SITE A$ T
PRIOR YO IS3UANCE 0�A S�RVICE PRQVIDEI�LETTER, If 3enoltiv,Areee exiat on Ihe site or wilhin 200 feet on
adjacent properlies,e Nalural Resources Assessment Report mdy also be fequiivd.
� 096ed on rovlew of the submiqad matarials and best availeblA informetion Sonsillve nrees do not appear to oxlet on�Ita or
w;fhln 200'of fhe slte. Th{s S�neltive Araa Pre-Saeoning 91tA Ases��tnant does NO7 oliminate the neod to e�aluate and
protoct u�aler quaiiry sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered, Thle doeumAnt WIII eerva as your Service Provider
IEtler es reqvired by Resolulion an�!Order q7-20,Section 3.02.1. All requirad permtts and approve�lr muat be obtained snd
wmplete�under�n�llcablo Ipcal,stoto,and fedor.,l�aw. �
❑ Base�l on review of the submitted n►alerirals and Cest available informallOn'the ebova�9(6�enced projeGt wlll not significafltly
imp2Cf the exir,ting Ot polentially sensitive area(s)f0und near tAe s�te.Thls Son�ltive Arse Pt'e•BCrOBAIne Site Assessment
dooe�ellminate�he need to eva�uate�and protoc�a4dilional walor quality s�nsitive areas if they arA subsequently
diseovered. Thls doc�ument wlll BaNe ea your Ser.vlee Prvvlcler letler ac rvquir,ed by Resolu�ion and order o7-z0,SEction
3.0�.1. All required��ermits and approvals must be obtalned anA compteled.undRr ttpplloebla local,state,and fedoral law.
� Thls 3e�vlca P�OVider Latt�r(s�ot valid unless CWS approv.d alta plan(s)are attdChed.
� The proposed aoiiv�ty does not n,os�the deflnitlon of developmant or the lot wes pla�led�fter 9/9/95 ORS A2.04o(2). NO SITE
ASSESSMENT S F2VICE PR bER LETT R IS REQUIRED,
Rvvlvw�d By: , ,_ . Date- �,�I
2550 SW HilleOo�u„i�l�way.Hillaboro,O�rqou 07723 ���
PI1��P: ($03}QO1-G100•FiY; (503)681-1439.wwwc anwuc�.p;r..,iuv:.riy .
��-•K�o;N�v.,swr
F. Water Flaw Test
TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT rest#: 790
FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST REPORT Hyarant �o #: 1S1W35D8H50
Location: SW 90th Ave. &SW Lomita Ave. Date: 4/22/2008
Test made by: Herb&James
Witness: Time: 10:38
Prolect name:
Discharqe coefficient: .906
inside dia. of otttlet = 2,5 inches
Pitof reading = 10 psi Pitot 2 = 0 psi
Observed flow rate = 533.97 gpm
Flow method: NOSE MONSTER
Static pressure: 87 psi Residual pressure: 69 psi �
Ffow at 20psi resicluai pressure (calculated)� 'I OH6 gpm ���, .
Location maa. To be attached to test report and to show which hvdrants were !� Z��6g
used to monitor residual ressure and flow. �
Gaqe information:
Static and residual oressure oaoe• O'I Z4OOB2 Pitot aacae: 01140262
Hydrant information:
H dran Year Make N tes
Flow hydrant: 1S1W35D8H50 1953 MUELLER see map forlocation
Read hydrant; 1S1W35D33H50 1951 IOWA see map forlocafion
Remarks:
The mapping, flow or pressure lnformation contained herein reflects conditions on the date
and time of the Eest. Tualatin Valley Water District makes no representation as to the system's
ahility Eo meet specific fire flow requirements. Future system capability may differ from the
flows reported herein because of subsequent modifications to the districYs sys#em and/or
because flow and pressure may vary by time of day and season. Test gage callibration
information available upon request.
��� � � $��h P�L.
Y�
P��
��,�r d
� �
t� Z � c� -
�
NC�I �— �
�.► dl I Q � � �
. /
��� � %,.
� ...� �a- ,.
b ,.
,
, �
� V- , ��
� � �
n b ~ . , � ,' �\�
�0 � �
.,
�
� S /�� � /�.
�
�
�
° � '3nb l0 NI� .
� o� �
��,y
/1d S l6 ��� ��
1 ,
,
,� '3nd �s l6
� ��
� /� i
�
�
�
¢ p�Z +�. � � �
C� ��
o J� ,
�
O �,� , � uz
, � ' d �
c� i _ ..
B. Pre-application Notes
PRE-APPLICATION
�' CONFERENCE RE QUE�
' CEIV
' ED
Cityof Ti�xZrrlPer�raz Cerrter� 13125 SWHaII Blul, Ti�z� OR 97223
Phon�• 503.639.4171 Fa�c:503.598.1960 �MAR 1 9 2007
GENERAL INFORMATION �LANNINGO/NG NEER NG
Applican� (��.��,� �� I� � !" / �
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Address: `��DO S�// q D�`j �/jC' Phone: 50 3 ���6�YI/
�
�� � /(� �"R� Zip: � 7 Z �.3 Case No.: PR C auu 7 -o 0 0.�S
� -� q�- Receipt No.: � �.:� � — (�9S
Contact Person: �1��l,L,� ���/ � Phone:�03-5f,6 —�qj/
Applicauon Accepted By: C � Cc�`.��
Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): tf�-�'(��� �� ��� Date: � � / �/ -� 7
DATE OF PRE-APP.: `f -3� '�7
Address: //��� r�'C!/ QO�`j �ve Phone: �3��8q/� TIME OF PRE-APP.: /U - v'�
�
c��: 1 ��,�R�7 z�P: 472z3 P�-�P.����:
xe�.�/s/o6
Property Address/Location�S�: c\cwpin\muters\land ute applications\Pre-App Request App.doc
REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): !J'9 3� �� o Z9oo (Note: applications will not be accepted
without the required submittal elements)
Zoning: �f, � � Pre-Application Conf.Request Form
Site Size: ,.�,z � 5 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
❑ Brief Description of the Proposal and any
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION site-specific questions/issues that you would
like to have staff research prior to the
All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by �eting.
the applicant and received by the Plannuig Division a minunum of one (11 ❑ Site Plan. The site plan must show the
week �rior to officially scheduling a �re-application conference date/time to proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn
allow staff ample time to prepare for the meeting. to scale. A1so, show the location of the
subject property in relation to the nearest
A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of the streeu; and the locauons of driveways on the
Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tues ,dav or Thuisday subject propertyand across the street.
momines. Pre-application conferences are one � hour long and are typically � VicinityMap.
held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM
❑ The Proposed Uses.
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDiJLED IN � Topographic Information. Include Contour
PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER Lines if Possible.
FROM 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY.
❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a
IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXI'ECTED TO ATTEND THE MONOPOLE project, the applicant must
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE attach a copy of the letter and proof in the
INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM form of an affidavit of mailing, that the
ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE collocation protocol was completed (see
GROLJP. Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard Community
Developmenc Code).
❑ Filing Fee$362.00
March 18, 2007
Vasile Repta
11400 SW 90�'Ave.
Tigard, OR 97223
(503) 516 - 8911
Dear City of Tigard: Engineering and Planing
Hello, my name is Vasile Repta, and I own a property in Tigard, OR at the address state
above. I would like to take advantage of the lot area around this property and do a land partition
of two more lots, at least. In the previous two years, I have applied for two lots land partition
with zoning R 4.5 and the City has approved it. I would very much like to see if there's the
possibility of increasing the zone of R4.5 to R 7, considering that one block East of my current
property, the zone is R 12. If it's possible, I would really like to have the opportunity to use the
available lots for the bettering of the City of Tigard graciosus community and atmosphere. I
thank you for taking in consideration my wishes and application,and most eagerly, I look
forward in meeting with the City staff.
Sincerely,
��� ��
Vasile Repta, owner
�� � �'� �
� �'� ►�� �T ;0 3 - ���'-8�/i
1�� �� ��` � ZZ:3
, �� \ - r�., !i�,�d c�� � �; .2� AC �;- o�
.�2 AC c�
� a
� �
'� S 8�-57-QOVti/ 2 73.6
, �
� � '1��.99
� � 224.e �`� �
� G�.S �Q r=��
' � ' , �
� ,
. i � ,
� � �
\ j �� � �
t� co , ,
�-.� � �,$� � ��� � � 3�0�
, �� �, _ �..._______. . �1� �, ,
� \ �.---._. 4_ . �r �
_ . --- --------- . � . �
''t Q% � �'" �� � 1-�o�L� . 1AC i ,� � .23 AC �' ���
, ' C)i �� ,� ' � c°n ,' �
aC� � �� � ' a '
� � � -- � ` ' ��.
� �
R \
' / \ �j ��Dr�lw � �'�� � � n
\ , � � se.� � ; ,�
. C�i ,�, � � r� � "
U�( � � '� �"`"..
, � .
� �/ � . �
\ � i ' �\ ^� 93�, ; ; ~ > �`�� \4, �y\ f �
,
r ~ � ��� �D�7 ' � , � ` � � 0
; � J� ,o ,`�� � ; � �� ,��S�3��l7 �� � r,� ►
' � i � � � ��� � f � � ' �o° � ' �6�Q� ` � � ` �' J , .�, '�
� � / � � � f� r� �� y\ � �/� �� � � .� ✓�-•7�-,j �� E
� / P� � � ,•� � � . �� . � . �/ , . _.
1.r. � ,� �
w��c� f��1�P 'Z �c�� t'' i�� C�►-�
i �1—�'a�
��
�
�
�
G
�
BLVD
0
,
,
\
:�
�
�
��� �
HAL
� I�� / f✓i1%
;
� i I . �
�� � r,EOe°anvnic �H�nkn.�nrion svsTev
� �
, VICINITY MAP
11400 SW 90TH AVE
ST _ _
�
U .
�
c� �
_ a�
�
� ,
�SUBJECT SITE
� ____ _
W � ;� �
- Q /, � I I
1S135DA02900
-
- - �
W
�Q � -
.
II , _ > N
- - Q ; I
� o so ioo iso zoo zsa F��
� � � � � � � I.II -- - 1"=199 feet
�_ � , „�,
� ; � � '� ��� ,
.. - . . — . . � �,,
LOMi�A '
; �� .
� IMOrmation on lhis map is for general location only and
' � , � 'should be venfied with the Developmant Services Division.
. ' I .. 13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tgard,OR 97223
(W3)639-0171
��� � . � , � http:/Iwww.ci.tigard.or.us
Community Developmeni Plot date:Mar 5,2007;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
Apnl 2007 May 2007
5 M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5
' 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 70 11 12
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 i6 17 18 19
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
zs so Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2� za zs 3o 3i
I -Pre-Apps CD Meetings _
I Early
8:00 AM
9:00 AM (9:00 AM) Ed Murphy 503-352-1136 10795 SW Cascade Ave CUP MITCH Charter School
� I
10:00 AM (10:00 AM)(10:00 AM Vasile Repta 503-516-8911 11400 SW 90th Ave 2 lot MLP)
i - - - - - ---
I 11:00 AM
� 12:00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
Late
Pre-Apps CD Meetings I - - - - - -
_ 1 3/26/2007-3:35 PM
April 2007 May 2007
I � 3 M T W T F S S M T W T F 5
' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ' 1 2 3 4 5 I
B 9 10 71 12 13 14 i '� 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I
15 16 17 70 19 20 21 � i13 14 15 16 17 18 79�
I 22 23 24 25 26 27 28', 20 27 22 23 24 25 26 i
i 29 30 27 2B 29 30 31 _�
---- _------ - Tuesday, April 03, 2007 __ -- --
-Pre-Apps CD Meetinqs I
r Early '
r 8:00 AM
—
' 9:00 AM i (9:00 AM - 10:00 AM) Trish Nixon 503-265-1542 Dratmouth&Clinton SDR '.
Trish Nixon 503'2651542 �
i
�
I
� 10:00 AM � (10:00 AM - 11:00 AM) Vasile Repta 503-516-8911 11400 SW 90th Ave 2-lot MLP
i i i
I
�
�– —
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
, 4:00 PM
Late
Tasks
I Notes
�
I
i
I I
i �
� I
( I
i
i �
� �
I i
{
�
�
�
1 i
Kristie Peerman 1 3/19/2007-4:34 PM
�—.
PRE-APPLICQTION COHFERENCE NOTES � '
.,f
➢ ENGINEERIHG SECTION \ CftyofTlgard,Oregen
('ommunity�DeveCopment
Sfia � ABetterCommun"
PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map[sl: 1S135DA
Tax Loasl: 2900
Us�iyme: MLP
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant
will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be
no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned
commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on
the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements
that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project.
Right-of-way dedication:
The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification
right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or
(2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
� SW 90t"Avenue to 27 feet from centerline
� SW Lomita Avenue to 51 feet radius
❑ SW to feet
❑ SW to feet
Street improvements:
� Half street improvements will be necessary along SW 90th Avenue, to include:
� 16 feet of pavement from centerline
� concrete curb
� storm sewers and other underground utilities
� 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5 foot planter strip
� street trees sized and spaced per TDC
� street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
CITY OF TIGARD Pro-Applicadon C�Meronce N�tes Page 1 N 6
Epll�url�!����rUe��t Seetln
� Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Lomita Avenue, to include:
� 40 feet of pavement from centerline radius
� concrete curb
� storm sewers and other underground utilities
� 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5 foot planter strip
� street trees sized and spaced per TDC
� street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a finro-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a finro-year streetlight fee.
CI?Y OF TI6ARD Pr�-�Applic�don Conferenca Mat�s Page 2�f 6
Eiglu�rin!oe�utwnt S�eUn
� ' ❑ Other:
Aqreement for Future Street Improvements:
In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently
practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval
may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee.
The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may
be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee:
(1.) Lomita Avenue
�2.)
Overhead Utilitv Lines:
� Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC} requires all overhead utility lines
adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a
fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines
are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to
$ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines.
There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW 90th Avenue
(opposite sideZ Prior to issuance of buildina permits, the applicant shall either place these
utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above.
Sanitary Sewers:
The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in 90th Avenue and
in Lomita Avenue. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the
developer's responsibility to provide separate laterals for each lot.
Water SupplV:
The Tualatin Valley Water District (Phone:(503) 642-1511) provides public water service in the area of
this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your
proposed development.
Fire Protection:
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: John Dalby, (503) 356-4723]
provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for
information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other
questions related to fire protection.
Storm Sewer Improvements:
All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed
to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm
CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicadon CoMer�nce No[es Page 3�f 6
EaglaeeMng�eqrtweet Sectlen
' drainage plan for the site, ar ' •nay be required to prepare a sub ' sin drainage analysis to ensure
that the proposed system wili :,ommodate runoff from upstream �,. �,erties when fully developed.
Stormwater must be discharged to an approved public storm system. This must be shown on the
plans with the Land Use applicafion.
�
Storm Water Qualitv:
The City has agreed to enforce SurFace Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the �
Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of
on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus
contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The
resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-
site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not
the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious
surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary
sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development
application. It is anticipated that this project will require:
❑ Construction of an on-site water quality facility.
� Payment of the fee in-lieu.
Other Comments:
All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City
maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance
access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily
accessible.
1) Preliminary sight distance certifrcation will be required for all shared driveways.
2) Extend of ha/f-street improvements on 90�h Avenue wil!be based on rough proportionality.
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic
Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected
impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon
the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of
the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee
category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited
circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy
permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible o� when the TIF is greater than
$5,000.00.
Pay the TIF
CITY OF TI6ARD Pr�-Applicatlon C�meronce N�tes Page 4 of 6
E�gl�e�rl�!9eprtneat Seetln
PERMITS
Public Facility Improvement fPFI) Permit:
Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering
Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall.
For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or
subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for
review and approval.
The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A
deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the
permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases
where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for
any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI
permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit.
The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security.
Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer
Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public
improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows:
NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicani must obtain thai
permit prior to release of any permits from the Building oiuision.
Building Division Permits:
The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more
detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at
503-639-4171, ext. 304.
Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial,
industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot
grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading
and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in
cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation
excavation material is not to be hauled from the site.
Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued
after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit.
Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all
work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This
permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially
complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City.
For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a
mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit.
CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicaaen Ce��r�nce Notes Page 5 N 6
Eplu�rl�!�q�rt�nt Sectlo�
� ' � Other Permits. There � other special permits, such as m� '�anical, electrical and plumbing
that may also be requirt_. Contact the Development Service� .ounter for more information.
GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS
All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The
engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as
well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in
determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer
will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each
homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall
include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall
also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building.
PREPARED BY: - • I�? • 7
ENGINEERING DEP ENT STAFF DATE
Phone: [5031639-4171
Fax: [5031624-0152
document2
Revised: September 2,2003
CITY OF TI6ARD Pr�-Applicatlon Comerence Notes Pag�6�f 6
Eeglneerin�Oepaitmeot Sectlan
�
� . •�
CITY OF TIGARD
.,
PRE-aPPIICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ° ��_
��,
i
4� a� ,��.;�,
(Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Yalid for Six (6) Months) �;�� _�� �,.
" -, -
PRE-APP.MTG.DATE
STAFF AT PRE-APP.: �
- -- _ ---_ -- � RESI DE NTIAL
APPLICANT: '�I CpSi I� ��tci AGENT: SC�t.vke
Phone: �S� ) S i - ��t 1 l Phone: O
PROPERTY LOCATION:
ADDRESS/GENERAL LOfJlTION: l I y v� S� q��` A-�;N_
TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): 1 S i 3 S l�/�c � T( � `�`�L C�
NECESSARY APPUCATIONS: V� L� I�c v�T L«� I-�- � r t-t ti ��
PROPOSA.L DESCRIPTION: 1�;��,� 1 Iu-E ��^� o� ��-� . K�r.� C `�•�` s�n u
1���Se .
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MAP DESIGNATION: l�c:�:=, —d-�e�Jns�-�-�, ('.�s�deh�-i c�, (
ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: � -�-} • S
IONING DISTRICT DIMENSlONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Seciion 18. � � � l
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:�q. ft. Average Min. lot width:_�ft. Max. building height: �G ft.
SeWacks: Front��ft. Side��ft. Rear ` r ft. Comer��ft. from street.
MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: CG % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: G %.
GARAGES:�ft.
❑ NEIGHBORNOOD MEETlNG (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting HandouU
THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED
PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two
(2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use
Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to
submittinq vour application or the application will not be accepted.
t NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans
Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9
Residential ApplicationlPlanning Division Section
. �
, .
� NARRATIYE [Refer to Code Chapter 18.390]
The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable
approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to
consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposai. The applicant shouid review
the code for applicable criteria.
�IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501
As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE
AN IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the
development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the
transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system,
the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type
of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize
the impact of the development on the public at larg e, public facilities systems, and affected private
property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real
property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or
provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not
roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
� ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.7651
Minimum number of accesses: � Minimum access width: �� ��
Minimum pavement width: i� -�
❑ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1051
Within all ATTACHED HOUSING (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each
residential dwelling SHALL BE CONNECTED BY WALKWAY TO THE VEHICULAR PARKING
AREA, COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES.
� REStDENT1Al DENSITY CALCU[ATIOM [Refer to Code Chapter 18.T151-5EE EIIAAMPLE BELOW.
The NET RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net
area of the developable land by the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as
specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development area is calculated by subtracting
the following land area(s)from the gross site area:
All sensitive lands areas includinq:
➢ Land within the 100-year floodplain;
➢ Slopes exceeding 25%;
➢ Drainageways; and
� Wetlands for the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts.
Public riqht-of-way dedication:
➢ Single-family allocate 20% of gross acres for public facilities; or
➢ Multi-family allocate 15% of gross acres for public facilities; or
� If available, the actual public facility square footage can be used for deduction.
EIIAMPLE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCUlATIONS:
EXAMPLE: USING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE(3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS
Single-Family Muld-Family
43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area 43,560 sq.ft. of gross site area
8,712 sq. ft. (20%)for public right-of-wav _6,534 sq.ft. (15%)for public riqht-of-wav
NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet
- .050 fminimum lot areal - _3A50 (minimum lot area)
= 11A Units Per Acre = 12.1 Units Per Acre
-�The Deuelopment Code requlres that the net site area exist ior the ne�t whole dwelling uni�NO ROONOING UP IS PERMITTED.
�Miaimum Proiect Density Is 80%01 the maximum allowed density.TO DETERMINE TNIS STANOARD,MULTIPLY THE MAKIMUM MUMBER Of UNITS BY.B.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9
ResidenGal AppliceGon/Planning Division SecOon
� SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to C�__.Section 18.7301
➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of
� FLAG LOT: A TEN (10)-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK applies to all primary structures.
➢ ZERO LOT LINE LOTS: A minimum of a ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained
between each dwelling unit or garage.
> MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL building separation standards apply within multiple-family
residentiai developments.
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less
than 2.5 acres in size. Five (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines.
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE UP TO 1,000 SQUARE FEET on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size.
[See applicable zoning district for the primary structures'setback requirements.l
�j fLAG LOT BUILOING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 1'/2 STORIES or 25 feet, whichever is less in most zones; 2Y2 stories, or 35
feet in R-7, R-12, R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Section 18.730.010.C.2 are
satisfied.
,� BUffERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.T451
In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE
OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the
CITY REQUIRES LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS along certain site perimeters. Required buffer
areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of
deciduo�s and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and
horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often
advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may onlv be occupied by
vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buifer area materials
and sizes may be found in the Development Code.
The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFERS applicable to vour proposal area is:
Buffer Level tU along north boundary. Buffer Level U along east boundary.
Buffer Level G along north boundary. Buffer Level U along east boundary.
IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: ��s ��w�
-f�I.-ECi� (�l/Y►2GJ �L�;}�ur1 ( (� -f er? o� a rP�� C»'r.� I b{'.
� LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.T65 and 18.]05l
STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR
PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must
be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-
way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured
four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the
branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Fu�ther information on regulations
affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED
in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking
areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view.
❑ RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551
Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE
SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such
as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within
Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at (503) 625-6177.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9
Resider.Gal Application/Planning Division Section
� PARKING [Refer to Code Chapt�._ 18.165 a 18.7051
ALL PARKING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE PAVED.
_� Single-family............ Requires: One 1 off-street parking space per dwelling unit; and
- — One �1� space per unit less than 500 square feet.
➢ Multiple-family.........Requires: 1.25 spaces per unit for 1 bedroom;
1.5 spaces per unit for 2 bedrooms; and
1.75 spaces per unit for 3 bedrooms.
Multi-family dwelling units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide parking for the use of
guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required parking.
NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED
AS COMPACT SPACES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows:
➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 6 inches X 18 feet, 6 inches.
➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet. 6 inches X 16 feet, 6 inches.
� Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned
disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to
be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space
symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be
posted.
❑ BICYCLE RACKS [Refer to Code Secdon 18.7651
BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in
convenient locations.
❑ SEN�ITIVE LANDS [Refe�to Cnde Chapter 18.7151
The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR
DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL
DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON
UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-
application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibilitv to preciselv
identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the aqplicant. Areas
meetinq the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the
development application.
Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands
areas. RESIDENTIA� DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS.
❑ STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.715.O70.C]
When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be
submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code
Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall
include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.
,� CLEANWAIER SERVICES[CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS [Refer to R�0 96-441USA Regulations-Chapter 3l
LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a
vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive
area.
Design Criteria:
The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table
identifies the required widths:
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9
Residential ApplicatioMPlanning Diwsion Section
� '
. ,
.wBLE 3.1 YEGETATEO CORRIDOR WIDTHS
SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANOARDS MANUQURESOLUTION a ORDER 96-44
SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT� WIDTH OF VEGETATED ,
TO SENSITIVE AREA CORRIDOR PER SIDE
• Streams with intermittent flow draining: �25�
� 10 to <50 acres 15 feet
1 >50 to <100 acres 25 feet
• Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet
• Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet
• Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow
• Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres
• Natural lakes and onds
. Streams with intermittent flow draining: �25�
� 10 to <50 acres 30 feet
� >50 to <100 acres 50 feet
• Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure
. Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting
• Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine {break in
• Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top
of ravine'
Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring
boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15
feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement.
ZVegetated corridor averaging or reduccion is allowed only when the vegetated coRidor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition.
3The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to
15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine.
Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor:
NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals,
dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract
from the water qualiry protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in fhe
USA Design and Construction Sfandards.
Location of Vegetated Corridor:
IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended
for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a
separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit.
CWS Service Provider Le e .
PRIOR TO S o any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service
Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive
area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS
Service Provider Letter is not required.
❑ SIGNS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801
SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of
Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or
height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a
development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for
Director's review.
� TREE REMOYAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ
A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a
certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a
development application for a subdivision, �artition, site development review, planned development,
or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9
Residential Application/P!anning Division Section
� �
, , ',
THE TREE PLAN SHALL , �UDE the following:
➢ Identification of the location, size, species, and condition of all existing trees greater than 6-
inch caliper.
➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in
caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according
to the following standards and shali be exclusive of trees required by other development code
provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots:
. Retainage of less than 25°/a of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a
mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees;
. Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that
two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.;
. Retainage of frorn 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that
50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.;
. Retainage of 75°/a or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no
mitigation;
➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and
➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to
protect trees dunng and after construction.
TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be
replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D.
� MITI6ATION [Refer to Code Sectlon 18J90.060.E1
REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines:
➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics.
➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably
available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural
resource value.
➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would
not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance
with the following formula:
. The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the
estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the
largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be
viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1} or more
replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property
or, with the consent of the owner, private property.
➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to
allow growth to maturity.
IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the
consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree
replacement.
.� CLEAR YISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1951
The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND
EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size
of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any
existing obstructions within the clear vision area. The applicant shall show the clear vision areas on
the site plan, and identify any obstructions in these areas.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9
ResidenGal ApplicatioNPlanning Divisbn Section
� '
• , ',
❑ fUTURE STREET PLAN AND E1iTEN. _a OF STBEETS [Refer to Cotle Sectlon 1�.._.0.030.FJ
A FUTURE STREET PLAN shall:
� Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The
plan shail show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the
proposed land division and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall
include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division.
➢ Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and
pedestrian facilities on or within 500 feet of the site.
Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall
be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed.
� ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601
MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process.
Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum
15-foot wide access easement.
The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the
parcel is less than 1 Yz times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
❑ BLOCKS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.090]
The perimeter of BLOCKS FORMED BY STREETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured
along the right-of-way center line except where street location is precluded by natural topography,
wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development.
When block lengths greater than 330 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided
through the block.
CODE CHAPTERS
_ 1 S.33O(conditana�Use) 'IB.F)ZO(Tigard Triangle Design Standar�s) _ �$.7F)O(Nonconforming 5ihiations)
_ 18.340(Directors�nter�xetation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) � 18.765(Off-Street Parkingl�oading Requirements)
_ �$.3�0(Planned Development) 1 H.f 4O(Durham Quarry Design Standards) _ 18.775(Sensitive�ands Review)
_ �$.360(Site Devebpment Review) � �S.7O5{AccesslEgresslCirculation) _ 18.7SO(Signs)
,.._ 'I H.37O(Variances/Adjustrnents) �$.7�O(Accessory ResidenGal Units) _ 'I$.7$�J(Temporary Use Permifs)
_ 1 H.3HO(Zoning Map/Tezt Amendments) � 18.715(Densiry Computations) � 18.790(7ree Removal)
_ 1 H.3S5(Misce��aneous Permits) 'I$.�ZO(Design Compatibiliry Standards) � 18.795(visual Clearance Areas)
� ')S.3gO(Decision Making Proceduresllmpact Study) 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) _ 18.79$�reless Communication Facilities)
_ 18.41 O(�ot�ine Adjustme�ts) � �$.730(Exceptions To Devebpment Standards) .�, 'I$.S�O(Street 8 U61ity Improvement Standards)
� 18.420(�and Partieons) 18.740(Histo�c o+ier�ay)
_ 18.430(SubdNisio�s) 18.742�Ho�o�cupaGon Pertnits)
� �S.�J�O(ResidenGal Zoning Districts) � �H.�45(Landscaping&Screening Standards)
_ 1 H.52O(Commercial Zoning Districts) 1 S.75O(Manufactured�lvtobil Home Regu�ations)
_ �S.53O{Industrial Zoning Districts) 15.755(Mixed Solid WastelRecycling Storege)
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9
ResidenGal Application/Planning Division Sectbn
s . '
• . �,
ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENT,..
� T��r-_ �t�+-s i S d.Js�� L�I N . i h��.e vnc�� l-� ���s; !-�Ic _ �..::1� � r
�F Dc'_�t�� ��^ f-�e_ [tnn �;c t,r-a ' ��., u�' \t�u►- C�c. c S �2�vv��l�S
rn.� I c�ts . �l 1 l o f s m�.t s�f- �c�_ �t I e�.c-4 -7, s�c� s F.
�� rss Pa��e�ts c�n�-! �' �la�. t,� I P� `' � h c.t cu��•f �� �o-f-
�c�e a _
�o� T j� �rri�wlC • �n�f✓.► 3 ►��.nrG � . �vr�.lud..e, =
_ �(� -�,� G�'✓�P� {tnP sS 12ea,-i�,,,
. ,�"� I1�GL� S f4-� f'L tr1 P�..�
� f.��f'_E' � QwoF�E?c.c( ,(�r'(t C.ci
PROCEDURE
�� Administrative Staff Review.
Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a
recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be
held by the City Council.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS
All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIV1510N STAFF MEMBER of the
Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications
subrnitted b mail or dro ed off at the counter without Plannin Division acce tance ma be
returne . he Planninq counter closes at 5: 0 PM.
Ma s submitted with an a lication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8'/z" x 11". One 8'/z" x 11"
ma o a ro ose ro'ect s a also e submitte or attac ment to t e sta re ort or
a ministrative decision. Applications wit un olded maps sha not be accepted.
The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the
application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter
submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted
materials are required.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9
Residential Application/Planning Division Section
!� . .
.
. � � � ' S -(� l.t��'-t'�J
The administrative decisior, public hearing will �pically occur ap, ,ximatel ys after an
application is accepted as being cornplete by the lanning Division. Applications involving difficult or
protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review.
Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public
hearing A 10-day public appeal perio follows all la-n�!u� se decisions. An appeal on this matter
would be heard by the Tigard ri n� .t Ut�c�r . A basic flow chart
which illustrates the review process is available� m the Planning Division upon request.
Land use applicati requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the
applicant no less tfy��0 days prior to the public hearing.
This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE
INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code
requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff
and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the
site.
SUBDIVISION PIAT NAME RESE TION [County Surueyo�'s Office: 503-648-88841
PRIOR TO SUB TING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard,
applicants are r uired to complete and file a subdivision �lat naming request with the Washington
County Surv or's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name.
Applications ill not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of
approval f m the Counry of the Subdivision Name Reservation.
BUILDING PERMITS
PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR
REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by
the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of
development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the
Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is
recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are
building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed.
Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be
demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that
structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policv is to apply those system
development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE
DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED).
e con erence an notes canno cover a o e requirements an aspects re ate to
site planning that should ap ply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide
information required, by the Gode shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements.
It is recommended tnat a prospectiye applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or
ask an questions of Cit staff relative to Code requirements pnor to submittin an application.
AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN
APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A
PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as
unnecessary by the Planning Division).
PREPARED BY: �mi L � c�
CITY OF TIGA D PLANlr1 G DIYISION • STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEfTING
PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-684-1291 DIREfT: 503-118- 11
EMAIL: �rn�a�tigard-ar.gov
TRLE18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMl1NITY DE4ELOPMENT CODE)INTERNETADDRESS: MIWW.tigard-or.gOY
H:lpattylmasterslPre-App Notes Residential.doc Updated: 12-Feb-07
(Engineering section:preapp.eng)
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9
Residential AppticaGon/Planning Division Sec6on
Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue
. Fire Marshal's Office
0 0 � ���,zo� - E�J� �
Date File No.
Project Name �(7 � `� � � �� " Lo� ���
The following checked items are applicable Fire Code requirements based on your proposal.
This form is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any type of approval of
your project or its design.
❑ FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads
shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an
approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance
to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150
feet. (IFC 503.1.1)
❑ DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided
with an approved turnaround. (IFC 503.2.5)
❑ FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION: When
buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire
apparatus access may be modified as approved by the fire code official. (IFC 503.1.1)
❑ ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS—COMMERCIAL: Where buildings exceed 30 feet in height or three
stories in height shall have at least three separate means of fire apparatus access. Buildings or facilities having
a gross area of more than 62,000 square feet shall be provided with at least two separate means of fire
apparatus access. Buildings up to 124,000 square feet provided with fire sprinklers may have a single access.
(IFC D104}
❑ ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS—ONE-OR TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: Where there are more than 30
one- or two-family dwelling units, not less than two separate approved means of access shall be provided.
Where there are more than 30 dwelling units and all are protected by approved residential sprinkler systems, a
single access will be allowed. (IFC D107)
❑ ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS— MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: Where there are more than 100
multiple-family dwelling units, not less than two separate approved means of access shall be provided. Projects
up to 200 dwelling units that are protected by approved residential sprinkler systems may have a single access.
Projects having more than 200 dwelling units shall have two separate approved means of access regardless of
whether they are equipped with fire sprinkler systems. (IFC D106)
❑ AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet in height
above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided with approved fire apparatus access roads
capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located
within the aerial fire apparatus access roadway. Fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width
of 26 feet in the immediate viciniry of any building or portion of building more than 30 feet in height. At least one of the
required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of'30 feet
from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. (IFC D105) __
❑ REMOTENESS: Where two access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not
less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to be served,
measured in a straight line between accesses. (IFC D104.3)
❑ GATES: Gates securing fire� ratus roads shall comply with all of the f� �ing: (IFC D103.5)
. Minimum unobstructed width shall be 16 feet, or two 10 foot s�_.�ons with a center post or
island.
. Gates serving one-or two-family dwellings shall be a minimum of 12 feet in width.
• Gales shall be set back a minimum of 30 feet from the intersecting roadway.
. Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type
• Manual operation shall be capable by one person
• Electric gates shall be equipped with a means for operation by fire department personnel
• Locking devices shall be approved.
❑ COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not
exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM)or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever
is less as calculated using IFC, Appendix B. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from
' e Marshal's Office. (IFC 6105.2)
S GLE FAMILY DWELLINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum available fire flow for single family
lings and duplexes served by a municipal water supply shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. If the structure(s)
' (are) 3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to IFC Appendix B. (IFC
6105.1)
❑ RURAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: Required fire flow for rural and suburban areas in which
adequate and reliable water supply systems do not exist may be calculated in accordance with National Fire
Protection Association Standard 1142, 2001 Edition, when approved by the fire code official. Please contact the
Fire Marshal's Office for special assistance and other requirements that may apply. (IFC B105.1.1)
❑ FIRE HYDRANTS — COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet
from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the
building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. This distance may be increased to 600 feet for
buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. (IFC 508.5.1)
❑ FIRE HYDRANTS—ONE-AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS & ACCESSORY STRUCTURES: Where a
portion of a structure is more than 600 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an
approved route around the exterior of the structure(s), on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. (IFC
508.5.1)
❑ FIRE HYDRANT NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION: The minimum number and distribution of fire hydrants
available to a building shall not be less tlian that listed in Appendix C, Table C 105.1.
Considerations for placinq fire hydrants may be as follows:
• Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants as approved.
Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point of a subject building that is protected
with fire sprinklers may contribute to the required number of hydrants.
• Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the
required number of hydrants unless approved by the fire code official.
. Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highways or freeways shall not
contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heavily traveled collector streets only as approved
by the fire code official.
. Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required
number of hydrants only if approved by the fire code official.
❑ FIRE HYf�RANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15
feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (IFC C102.1)
❑ REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of
reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline
of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a
centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (IFC 508.5.4) --
❑ FIRE HYDRANT/FIRE DEPAF ENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant sha located within 100 feet of a
fire department connection (FDC). rire hydrants and FDC's shall be located o�, ,�ie same side of the fire
apparatus access roadway. FDC's shall normally be remote except when approved by the fire code official.
(IFC 912.2)
❑ ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus
access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible
construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. (IFC 1410.1 & 1412.1)_
❑ KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for access is required for this building. Please contaci the Fire Marshal's Office for
an order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. (IFC 506)
Additional information may be obtained from our web site at www.tvfr.com
John K. Dalby, Deputy Fire Marshal II
Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, North Division
503-356-4700
��CP&D
CAI�BELL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES,INC.
February 20, 2008
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: Pre-application Meeting
Repta Partition
Dear Staff;
Please see the attached application form and materials for a Pre-application Conference. The
applicant and owner is Vasile Repta and the properiy is located at 11400 SW 90`h Avenue.
The property is .62 acres (27,000 s fl and includes an existing residence on the front part of
the property. The property is zoned R-4.5 which allows lots of 7,SOOsf for single family lots
and 10,000 sf for duplex lots. 'The allowable density for the property is 3.6 units.
The owner is requesting a partition of the property into two lots as is shown on the existing
conditions map and preliminary partition plan. The owner is also requesting a conditional
review approval to allow a duplex on the back parcel of the property. The existing house will
be included on the front parcel (Parcel 1) of 15,230 sf and will maintain its existing access
and utility connections to SW 90`h Avenue, no other improvements are proposed for Parcel 1.
The vacant portion of the property will be split into a flag lot that will access onto SW
Lomita Avenue to the west (Parcel2). The lot will be 10,600 sf and will be 90 feet wide for
most of the lot width for 85 feet and reduces down to 65.7 feet for approximately 44 feet.
The owner plans on keeping the existing shed on Parcel 1. The total length of Parcel2 is 129
feet. The existing flag portion of Parcel2 will be 15 feet wide providing adequate access to
Parcel2. The property is flat with a slight slope toward SW Lomita Avenue.
The existing conditions site plan shows the location of existing trees on the property that are
over 12 inches in caliper. It is expected that only 1 or 2 trees over 12 inches caliper will need
to be removed and possibly only 4 trees total would be removed to allow the construction of
the duplex. An arborist will review the surveyed trees and will provide a tree removal and
protection plan in accordance with the City of Tigard requirements. There are no sensitive
areas on the site.
Adequate utility connections can be made within Lomita Avenue. Tualatin Valley Water
provides water services to the property via a 4 inch water line. The City of Tigard has a
sewer line ending within the cul-de-sac of SW Lomita Avenue which can be connected to the
property. Drainage will be handled onsite and discharged into SW Lomita Avenue where
3851 SW 50`�Avenue; Portland,OR 97221 �Phone: 503-229-4449�Fax: 503-297-3537
� Repta Partition
Page 2
drainage water can be collected into the existing drainage system serving SW Lomita Avenue
according to the City of Tigazd standards for a single family residence(duplex). Only minor
improvements will be necessary for the utility connections,new access driveway and curb
cut for the construction of the residential duplex house.
The applicant would like to verify all applicable code requirements and application
requirements for the partition including required plans and studies. It's anticipated that the
only improvements that will be required will be on Lomita Avenue and that those
improvements will be limited to utility connections and a new driveway cut serving Parcel2.
We look forward to discussing the proposal in more detail with staff.
Sincerely,
Douglas Campbell
Campbell Planning and Development
Encl.: Pre-application form, partition plan,pictures, utility maps
c: Vasile Repta
3851 SW 50`�Avenue;Portland,OR 97221 �Phone: 503-229-4449�Fax: 503-297-3787
PG�lNt�rv4.r T� q, -
EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP
N A TRACT pi IAND
SRUATE� MI fl�SE 1/s, SECTqN !S, T 1S,N 1W, 1►M
A Crtr OF TICARD, COUNtt OP MASN�NGTON, StA�E OP ORECON
w iEBRWRV 2008
gl I
N E �I �I ;� ..:r::::.;
S II a�
"PN 1993-013"
� I� ��
,•_�• ..
� �� �� LOT ��,. _; .. TL 280� �°:'sv
0 20 +;are� 2
�� � Y� nK�;2 -�-"_..—
s. � ���� ;;,,-,,:
I I I .iG :_,ktf�[K
✓��>>
t
� � � 3 � � �;.n= BS Oo ;
�� �� r;���., ��� >.. �.; � � <t .,.r,c�:��W -
I �`' j � �,..� � H o
-1'GE i�i#,�. t ..)\ FE i� i«.''i!k � 6E.4N�UCN,.�
�I I �,� J'�\� o � i U :�ri,�,�r; �0649 SF2 ` o
sE, �->�;r!{svc�c.*�, �L.
�-��..r' ��-. _� 8 � . "
� ..
� '
�. � ... ; � � �•,�„�-; <.
}� z
2r,°�o ra �=:w�_>
I i �� o � � 23 47' � <t,��a
% � , �� .+'�° DECK Noa 57'00"E +
M'f, e� s:-,^"�. _ r_ ,� r'_ � TL 3000
�� _"��� ,�- t o +� 90 19' �, .23 AC
� Y" - ..'� � �., 3
4`a l i� W 4 �,� n: :a:,,Em o � s
s � � s ��� �� ' ' ,
y�`� � HOUSE W o f , °r' \ ,r ecc �} o
W� � "� ' = a`, Or =,cws '`` PARCEL 1 � �t �,,� � e- zr ,
�II 2S1 ,� 1b230SF '� � '� ,�_. ,..� �?. .�>;Z
�
z � � ,� � �a �� �
W II ' -� �, a��,t�: S�►s�T = ' �
~ � ` o PAD t�r� , , r �. o
�, f _. b ,
d� Io I �` e.c;c:;���: _ � _
"►�� �� � ��T �� �` � "�•"" 589'17'23" 61.07'
F �� t6. - 51'34'a2" 7.3Y--
O� �
�I � I 109.64' „<, `144.87' L=10.81' w g
��� I rse'>>"e 2sa.»� . �`�
�
s� �
, � , �arr�ToNL:�
�ESS�D� w I LOT 1 ~LOMITA�� LOT 2 W �
� � I d �
a�coN I
JOE N.�qCU50N I I I d .
� I
uw[.r aa i �� �
'�""�,.�,;;,.,'"°"`q � o i
�.�.-,�,� � .a
'� I I CUCNT: YASRf �E►TA Fer�uaon Land Surveylns, lnc. S"«T NO. ' a �
� I 11100 S[ YOiM AVE 6/6 SE 106TM AvE. PORTLAND, OR 97Z16 J0� ►M• 00-012
nauo. oRCCwM ��. (sos) �oe-oeo� ro. (sos) soe-oso2 o�rrcc t.i..oe wRr
1S 1 35DA 1S 1 35DA
y `'. �,. ' . �_ ;�,� f i ��.- '1' � I ,«n� ... f,_
__. . I � i �I
8 - _ _ . .___. ,y�r, 1 ,��� • , �
_- _.'_a,^"... "_'�._. ���._�-t, f ~ ^ I'�C I � f I n.w' " \ � ,
... , . �� ...._ i ..r, ' �� .,1��.�:... . ti. , _b 1g 1 f g,�,l ,u� i I � > . �J.� , n � .wrs aw.r� I w �..._.
+'., ._;_eu .. , „ ! ,�,
�'P , . . . . . . . � : � . . , ��c � 9,� � � �' <\ ����v o . .waw'. l i ' rru;
, g �� � r_ _ d � :>1 � s »�.wi- E --i .a
� GPAHAM�CNES i��� I f GMHAMACRES ����w0 -�� � � -00 1 .1'.�).� ' �
i I
L0�531�35 20eAC . ' . . � LSxAG o �H6 I lluW ': NnM !H/TN
YqCATED7B�18638 � � � L0T51D�12 I.Y1K ' �wfa 1 ' - . � 3 __� '_'_"'__
: V�GTED'l8-18836 ¢ ��--- '
. • ' . VI : . a I�00 � ' L�.ss + IN6 N I� MM IM]M �
\:. �.�`...._.._ f ' �b}1 >!'� . . . . `� ] � . . . ... . !W � � IN1N-
_ ...., ...r ..'._.._. . ... wt --p_.�yet ..____'_-_._. _1➢I.�S.-"-_. _ ... ._'-- NAC ['[ I. .., ��_
." - "___-. _ _._" , " �._...�. . --- -
�I V
i ., - —� .. . .� o _
_ - .�-- ---.— Q �
. . � � . VACAtFO i ) 6600 �� -. _'. -. �_-_ ._..-. . - . .. � � �� r�6AC R�- � ue , rfs � srw WM� tEfw� t8fw
+ • - • ---- -- .�,�
. nn � . ", _____ v:.�e-_- • _. _...___... _ava _ -.- _._.... _.-_ . onlo J : i _ _ .__ . . . .__� __
( I � 10 -- . ._._ � v.u_. . :iiw � .
f � I � . • � � � tS)M �
� \`��. � n s�ec I & ---- -�nu __. -^I m'I r f� ^ � '.
\ 3900
25 �:K I i e � � ,00 ,
�� r
c � � C`J w�c $ �w isiw
�Y 2g�p Y'� 17 � . ONAFI�MACRES '.,
� _�w.,J � F wrs 1]-xt 8 x� � e •
i ,�,� I i � t i 9T� • VACATED]816838 �eo� � � - -- -- 2 WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON
� ���K ' 1 t�A � �•� �� �..,,p,.o�, � , i NE114 SE1/4 SECTION 3b T1S R7 W W.M.
„ ' �.. j e A i :n� ST,y�,� T� .. �._._._ „�„ _ - - - xQO __ _ scn�e,- ,o0
- - , �-_� = .
--1 r fi � y ;� G,9R . k, �wa I o , _
�� ��.�
�8i .' 'L 844600 :� , �cy� . . oy,c :� j � 0 a�. ___ ___ __ _ .. _. � 'm� 36.� 31 32 I 33��� 31 �35 �-36'31 �
��I � i {�,'� 2 h�°� " . . seoo �� ,... I �j z.snc . �
'_ � ]E07 � '� w.p xE07 RI I��� � ��jl. ��'J/ . � � ��' ' � / t2 � 1 6 5 I- 3 I 2 '�.1: ,R �
.,a Ie� zB �}+ { �,_�
,.so. � ��� I 0� - -1 aiic � �F�;�A45 vp qy ,� `� � , �� y a :'� � 8 9 � io >> : �; i
� e. , w�'*aoo qj W� .000 J) �. � �z �--I- -i-. .
.w�c e . ts?a�..... -
. C� I I i s� � ' ar mn i'1� ��Y^� . .-• „�� � ._.-7- - . .. -- - - � �� .
xJ �r�_. . i.
� +' ' ; I . A � 73 78 77 7$��y6 1! �13 78 '
-
a.wo 2 +o.�� �.�. _ e wm 'h . �M�wTFO (� f ' _ I __
.... .y- .. . � xxox � r� I S �°° �ia 2� 79 + �, �I .
„ � . - -
R DAY8�f4-• �o"� �oK «,� � 2 r� a. ie
—3TREE-�— p, ... � 13 .
'SW --f'dBRTH----- r � -
_... -- .:� .. . . �r.w�n[Erl �,_. ;..._..b�'� �neeee:eic I� � 11, ` r. .
. . � I
'� • � � " i g�i 25 �30 28 � 28-:27�26 .25 30 �
�,t+�re ',,,�: ,,. 4:;�. a�+"�e- Ri j ; r _ . p..a ,�.�� I � -- --xxoo- B i -..._ .._ -� -� - -
iz �� � ..�. � � ---;.
^ O In - � 2e�C : I 4 • O .1eK �I ��
.� . .._ �I { � 1 �. l._ . w �nc =aB00 �� � . _ w � i 36 �37 I 32 33��31 35 .36 31 ,
A; = C 1 I 1 4'� � � a i � _ -- - I _.
1 � no:
�. ? --_.
v ' t u �' ._j , � i � . �� 1 .i.s. 5 ��. 4_!_3 �_.z. � -.�6�
' �,a � U• +�� �_9�� I � �i e � � I 2 3 81 I a�� �I J I ' �� F OR ADDIT I O NAL MAP S V 1 5 R O U R W E H S l i E A T
t da ;_
' ^.'-
. � \ 's`,� `+'-- ' --.R` ��.�n��,c .;. n �� ��� � n�' i` `�I�� . _.. 16--- ._ ._ �� e a 1e tl -- `� ...wwwco.wsshlnpion.or,uc ..
S' }.ti 7 0 �, � -- !�� ,.,. "lis�_ , i -�
�� .��� R � T r„ J � @ _ __ 'Y � s� ��, � � �1 J i � ,j� l{°„ ee ' en � �e ; n� �
� fn inm. ^ s. � � ,� r.i
e . \ � - �� r_ _k
� U•� .� 1 2lPa! .._H�4« e I
�o„ �...� .soo....� .,.�� ° � i '� kd� i
7000 -�' w -- )8 �� �9 � _ A �F
,li °I i ao 13
-- , r� � - , � rl - - _ .
e +4.. ��-ie'� 6 ���� �''wc''�C'I �-_ ��t *' 28ot .tY00I :iAC I ������� I� .. BC B� ��, AC ��AD
13 i o
--~ � ��yy,�, . k i f A zeoa �*� � . �!. .1I� t 8 5� . I -� -- . . �
� ...n .x�c ' vm,�c .� �� .a�cl ,+ + I i
_ • �
.
.rs q , .. � ` �d$ ia�
;t� r� r N ��, , �t� �,� �j . � 9 ,a 1 ,...,,��_`, ' � I . � � i � i �SECT ON 35-0,,�
} ,
m � � `� � � �^ 3 � ?�.n_ ,I . i „ , � u � L '
_ ..�. �.�__, --- -
.��. ��M� � ��� � e�9 9 a3� iC� zaox �:� � � -- ^ � � _ M�SW PFAFFLEL .��., "_ --�C F -� �v�---
i
',�r ^ � � ,;f2 �i �'%~'�160� e� w � 6 �Z .x.� �e� n II I � . A, S�T REET _ _ S J cc � c� oc � o0
r i �1} -0 ?) � �noo � �..:.
p , .».�m. .n
r» -.�� s',��:-�--e " _ _
n Q a 3 �i �� t Q. , �... , a�oo _. _ _ T` � I .;oo c,l i �
� '... ..1L� �� am � --{_ z9oo � i17 . ..I I � � .,I �� '� o . .
n �° -•r 10° � 2�� g COntelleCTaaloLSFOr iS135DA
� 5 `,� �,.., I� � � .r ' u ,.,,� � ,3�:
.� .� A��s� ���
� � 3��� r�,c �F; �,o,i° i� 1 z��c , � _., ._a,:.,- -- �l . -� - - i 4��. ° .,,r,c no ,.,,e)., .�,�ar7w�� ..
o .T�A„� ,9
_, ,,K ` °—;� =l=`y� ' ,z =
�....��. ioY87-.:. Mm �.� � ...i� ... _ _' k. /�'' ._ _ _. _. 3'�if'7��18. [' 3603 i+,- .m 11C � i � . <,
�� � 4� . _._ 1�. . 7yy,� O ,�� .��" I� e�
�N � . so . �i aa �su am� " • ._. , • .� / L �} x
Y � i;8 8i. we 8 �& 8 j0 E .�aAC .._ 1� � p � /���f
.,._� ✓*�--a°. � �,��, j s4- ��..� a. .>.a- : ,,e- --�'� ?��.� f � �, 'is�a7� R?i �A.,- - ���I = K..�� '°„" C, � I it �c FED 4 1
� ' '� F J 8f g uxou Z S (� `l tl , a��'_ . -. �I � I .
J � :. ;i '� C;k m'] , LLl �. _-T+�r,— i
.'3 R , .¢j t J!. 9 n� ; rn_ RI �'c\ ���. r. ...�__. � __.. .�.._ I _. .. . _
s1 i t !
. .�� a!i i � � H rK � i� � � pp r . „ .
RI W 9 =. � U Q.�. ,_ . ..___ � � �ia L'r:___._ _- �I F "� J ii��ie ie��.v �8 /.�� . ., .
n.�o e � �� .n a....f .. .1�� �fi� a.�l i ..__. ��m ( tt{ .r.oew -- - �4 ___ . .�tyc.s . .»�_ _.__� ,�v �� (�PflV �
� 3 - i > .�'.. :
z + � -f r�, � � � ��\ � ;_ ,. -- *� ..,� - - -- - ; ; � r `�� CARTOG
I uoo r
a°°°i� gl � 'j \ti\Si'�°� y _B ai�c �.. _w! r �R t3' d' i»K �a . . _w. unue�r .Ig �I 7J00 �� / -. . . .
x 1 °� '�Ci 5a a . :�>ao - ry _� �e H 's xvo�o_x R'.• F�,..o,i •'d n.c- �C —� g � x�».,.�.,�a...
Q I'm � o � - � .i„Ir i. aK .��MO.�a�,.
��,W � � � a : e isoi `�`�` PLOT DATE:December OB,2006
Z -
� - -
A k 6 �[NPfm �Z �' I J .
� � - - FOAOASSESSMENTPUAPO�ES
.�,m. ' ` ; . p NL
s � e 'eon°° � Y s „�c 2, �.,� � e � ��' �� „ i
�„��w '�'„�"" �
181ffi1�101 1S1]AIO�p 761!l�II�WO
it70U� _ 11�D pppp �
�S��I911m0 15t". •qpp h
11D1 151]4151110D
I1�
I
3
g ta s2
�9BD�tm 151Y�611�0 � 161)lp61t]00
11}f0 11]15 11]10 161]m10flpp
/1JI0
131�
�8 1151
ts��amaoo tsi�em
nss i�zeo
tsisvan�o isixoen000
��m �t32�
$ 576
'����'0°° � 58890 18 isia�a�m `e�
�`��p �simrmeot
� ttm
,s,�,� ,s,�,z,m ,a,�.,� Qo-�4�
n�� nar nm
isia�e+mo 9497 isi�mm
n�eo
++a�
imemmo
� Tt .--�� ,5,�,,,a
,b,�
; 5 c ,s,;� ,s,�„� „�
„�, �
�,
,5,�18�
11m
� tS1141BmmD �
11�
�114a
1
151]![JOppl1)
11H0
�s�xoem�oo ui�memeoo 56593 �sia�mm
iun
tai�evmo +s�memm 's'�� ia��vo�
i� ttas ��m nas
5801
+sus000mie
�iuo
tsumetum istmaoam tsta�omew
is+�em �s��emam +s��enaoo »�s nao t166
��� iun 5%
2 2�5
tSt]�061615
tt!!D
0
1St'3�06tl4S
11�
t�a 161lIDpp6�IW 151S��M�pp 15181VIA0
181"�1B@ppp 1Et]mB00m0 11� � t311`Dpp]B11 0 11315
ttf6 tt'.b0
1S1]41�IAp
11SV �
Mllp�
11313 I
i �
181�'.Rm 15f]410O1l1]
1150 I � ttSp
,5,�amom 5�9 ,S,,.oeooeoo , 3
»� tuu
1 ,s��namem V
� isi3�emmo nse . �
� nsbo
1
t5t1Y10618t1
181]m00i7HY ll:m
ttilD �
t811ID061l0!
tSt�fll]tm tt5]3
11585 151�10D
11�
- 151J�DCOmOD 15155�00]B11
Sl 11'!0
ISIY,�➢COT100
- 1t6p0 16t]0000]!p0
�iii.i4?. 11lOD 131]�OUXOB
� t1Ql
i,:��'�
� 15114JOWR0
Z8 11m0
C ur�.ia�m xas.st• 595 0
tsix�moam J -��E
i�as isixvca�aao rs�rmcorom
naa ttms
�s�ammm is+b000mo
n� ��see
. 577 5 �
/ ° �si�Om�a
� I °2 nao
,`\�n
tatmoo�eoo
`� �si�cneuo ��r+s S�nm �st�oaQ�ca
526 ii�w
u��CO��ao �9519'
tf]m
�
•� �a�mco�roo�
+�ws niamom+m
moo ���
�s�aormim
� �•. _•�, nrn
� ssnmcniSm 1 5� �siivmiem
��� 7 t�»�
�l;.i^-
181]�"!!01
ntOD
,s,moo�mo 17s 5a o+'
- ttno 5918 p-UN�^°W
�si�mum . nas
t�ra � 18siil
151bpOD�Im
�I „�
,s,�,.� �
„� ,.,�
� �
��� ,s$<�s
°� ,s,mcc�
"'� +s+a�oonm
�,�� ,s,,,�m � „� �,�
,,,� .�� �-,,
�� • ,
/ � , , '
,
- __ - ,.._ __.. __..._ , .-_
_.......__..�._ �.
, , DAI�C4T,q
91 st � � AVE: � '�
� �
�5sa, �� �� I �
. '
-- _ ; , 9
. � ; � I
,
! .
.__
� � � f-___--
, . __ __ ___ ; �
, __ ,
,- , i
__ ; , � ,
,
' � �!_GR4V�
�
;
. _ _ .
___ _ : ; I r � I _ _ --_
; i ' i i
;
� '� ' � � A VE �
.
g ' , , i .
i � gi
� ' i �
-._
� � i
� � ,
.••�
__ -._____ � -_
_= ..
_-___ ------ , �
T � �
� - .
! , 0 _ __ _. ___;
' L0�1ITA AVE:�
� � 4� �
�-__._.._�...'
� i i
'.,.W � � �. �� I � .�!
- -- ._.__.. ��� .. z � � :' ' �
C�_______ . �p�
-____ _
- _ _ i
; _ ��_ _ __ ---�- _
� � ��� __ ____ __ _ _
U) � ��� � � - _
; > �
— • ; _��� � ;
i �p�� � i
; � �Q ! �
i ��r+ /�
� ��� ;.
_ __�
; g����
___ _ _--- _ ___ .
; _____ � - --
, __ ____ _
p� �
i i ! �;
� �� ti
i -�
' ; �� ��
, i ;
, '.. i �m� , �
__..— � I � � ��� �
� �
� '
V . '
m
.
BLVD. ' � HA
,reF'� ,revv p,� ,�=e- e-cv
� abond �
� � T ~ .
I �
V <
� � �
� T
�!`y- J �O � y �I
. .
' • . ' �
� ,�R' '�rl�'` � � . . � � . ,
r r i��' . _
. \
' .. . i ♦�'1` � �.`�:t' �• - y �
� � . Y�
• 't� .. �-:r � . .
. . ..f�.•, ,•1
.. '1 �� �
_� �
� \.. �
. -�, �
� ' �i : .s . ' , • .
• = ... i - '
-1"�'n
.� • � � • �• � • � • � . • • '
� �,• �o'�'ry � +-"�.°��
.ti�7�, � �.� � r - .
- ��*rR , � ';� � ,:.
s �� �•� �
a. s � �:3 ��+ . � .. _ �ss£. �.
. �.- ' 4'� ! I� �. :. � � �s:
;y,�� `�R �ti. �:'' ,�
�
� n. ,
': �.' � � : .�.
n�'�-. � ��`� � ..-, .
, . �� �r� �, _ . - . Y. �.
j' '�� . �n'!, ' � � ¢F`.'
� �'.
� � ,j i xj�';
�.n�:��y����e . . . �$�
' � "��_Y_ �.
_ - _.y .....�..�....... . *. . ::.�'i'.-�..
� .
1 � • � �1 / � • / �� �� , � • � 1 1 � �
�� 4. '
a� .�'
y� i1'. .��` � .
`'l'.�:� ,r*iYr:� �` �:
� 'a'� Fy� �; � �� J V
� r .� �/ /� ".V .:�.��. �.!'���.
�
,' .6��1 ��� ..:��rt. , �,✓,r: . -
� � .�.��"�'�', .$� ,�� .:^x • '�� �'X�I'Fr' r t•✓' �����t .r , .i;;� � 1n'�e.
� � � ... ;� , iP'��.i� .:1� . �!r� r''1,'/�l��J'!M�6��� . ..r,. _. �...�
. �� (—�S� .��..
-- - , i�
..s" . .�`�''n� � :�•
� . �
� ° } t.
,� „r �� . =?`. � ;�` �.,.,�
� � 'i ;, : �'.
.'. .s� � r . -
..�"�. im,. '�
�' r. �yTh,�� ,�
• • •� • � � � �• -� . � � ' � � �
PRE-APPLICATION CONf EREHCE NOTES ,
a
➢ ENGINEERIHG SECTION \ Cltyofllgard,Oregon
Community�DeveCopment
SFia i A BetterCommuni
PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map[sl: 1S135DA
TaK Lot[sl: 2900
Use Type: MLP
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant
will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be
no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned
commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on
the application. The following comments are a proiection of public improvement related requirements
that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project.
Right-of-wav dedication:
The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification
right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or
(2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
� SW 90th Avenue to 27 feet from centerline
� SW Lomita Avenue to 51 feet radius
❑ SW to feet
❑ SW to feet
Street improvements:
� Half street improvements will be necessary along SW 90th Avenue, to include:
� 16 feet of pavement from centerline
� concrete curb
� storm sewers and other underground utilities
� 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5 foot planter strip
� street trees sized and spaced per TDC
� street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a finro-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page 1 ef 6
Englneering UepartmentSectlon
� Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Lomita Avenue, to include:
� 40 feet of pavement from centerline radius
� concrete curb
� storm sewers and other underground utilities
� 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5 foot planter strip
� street trees sized and spaced per TDC
� street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a finro-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a finro-year streetlight fee.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page 2 of 6
Englneering OepartmentSec[lon
❑ Other:
Aqreement for Future Street Improvements:
In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently
practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval
may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee.
The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may
be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee:
(1.) Lomita Avenue
�2.)
Overhead Utilit Lines:
� Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines
adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a
fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines
are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to
$ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines.
There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW 90th Avenue
(opposite side). Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall either place these
utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above.
Sanitary Sewers:
The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in 90th Avenue and
in Lomita Avenue. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer: It is the
developer's responsibility to provide separate laterals for each lot.
Water Supply:
The Tualatin Valley Water District (Phone:(503) 642-1511 provides public water service in the area of
this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your
proposed development.
Fire Protection:
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: John Dalby, (503) 356-4723]
provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for
information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other
questions related to fire protection.
Storm Sewer Improvements:
All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed
to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm
CITY OF fl6ARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notea Pag�3 of 6
Engineoring OepartmentSec[lon
drainage plan for the site, a►- ' may be required to prepare a sub ' �sin drainage analysis to ensure
that the proposed system wil� :,ommodate runoff from upstream �,. ,�erties when fully developed.
Stormwafer musf be discharged to an approved public storm system. This must be shown on the
plans with the Land Use application.
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the
Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of
on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus
contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surFaces. The
resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-
site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not
the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious
surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary
sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development
application. It is anticipated that this project will require:
❑ Construction of an on-site water quality facility.
� Payment of the fee in-lieu.
Other Comments:
All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City
maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance
access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily
accessible.
1) Preliminary sight distance cerfification wil!be required for all shared driveways.
2) Extend of half-street improvements on 90�h Avenue will be based on rough proportionality.
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic
Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected
impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon
the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of
the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee
category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of buildincLpermit issuance. In limited
circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy
permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible o� when the TIF is greater than
$5,000.00.
Pay the TIF
CITY OF flGARD Pre-Applicatlon Comerence Notes Page 4 ot 6
Eagiaaerin9 Oapar[ment SecUoa
PERMITS
Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit:
Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering
Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall.
For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or
subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for
review and approval.
The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A
deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the
permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases
where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for
any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI
permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit.
The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security.
Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer
Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public
improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows:
NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must oqtain that
permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Diuision.
Buildinq Division Permits:
The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more
detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at
503-639-4171, e�. 304.
Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial,
industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot
grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading
and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in
cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation
excavation material is not to be hauled from the site.
Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued
after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit.
Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all
work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This
permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially
complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City.
For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a
mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit.
CITY OF TI6ARD Pro-Applicatlon Confer�nce Motes Page 5 ef 6
Englneering OepattmeotSectlon
Other Permits. TherP �� other special permits, such as m� ,hanical, electrical and plumbing
that may also be requ, . Contact the Development Servicc. „ounter for more information.
GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS
All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The
engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as
well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in
determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer
will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each
homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall
include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall
also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building.
3 . 4 � ae
PREPARED BY: - l� -�
ENGINEERIN �EPARTME T STAFF DATE
Phone: [5031639-41T1
Fax: [5031624-0152
document2
Revised: September 2,2003
CRY OF T16ARD Pre-Applicadon Co�erence Notes Page 6 of 6
EnglneeHng Oepartmen[Sactlon
Tuesday February 2008 March 2008 April 2008
O� 1 1 2 3 4
4 5 6 7 8 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 11
11 12 13 14 15 10 11 12 13 14 14 15 16 17 18
18 19 20 21 22 17 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25
March 2008 25 26 27 28 29 24 25 26 27 28 28 29 30
31
— __���
Day 64,302 Left Week 10
Appointments
8 00
30
9 00
30
10°°
30
1 � OOi Pre-App Vasile Repta 503-620-8558 11400 SW 90th 2 lot MLP �
30 - — ------- _.
12��
PM so
� oa
30
2 00
30
3 ��
�o
00
30
5 ��
30
�i��nnna a m nnn v� Nohnmrk Roniiroc
�, �
,,���'��� �
PRE-APPLICATION -, f r �
: ��T� CONFERENCE RE ��U�
� . QUEST :M�
� City of Tigard Permit Center 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223
� Phone: 503.639.4171 Fax.•503.598.1960
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant:_l/'� 5�� Q e�Ta.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
rlddress: l/'�� � c,� q0����Phone: 503-620-855$
Ciry:_�lGlssi�d' Zip: � 7.�.Z Case No.: ����li,'"��° 0'ZJ"U''J'7
n Receipt No.: ��� ��> 7�
Contact Person:�/�/,<< �p��rsap�G`� Phone: $�3�Z 9'yy
�}}l1�0/lGq�.TS RsP✓eseiv%aTivY �pplication�lccepted By: S- "���
Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)• Date:_ �"��-�'�]�
!/'a s�/-c u�.•-�L.�' /le.o7a {1��oY
� DATE OF PRE-APP.:
1lddress: __��YDm c'✓ 9C���/J!/fPhone:�03,�9—�s'�s�t�+ TIME OF PRE-APP.: ��f�
c�ry: 7"�s�.a r Zip: �7�j 3 PRE-APP.HE1.D WITH:
�r �/ Rev.7/1/07
Property Address/Location�S�:�Q�AN � LL S 4�j0(/.P i:\cuipin\masters\land use applica[ions\PrcApp Request App.doc
REOUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): / S / 3 S �A 2�Op (Note: applications will not be accepted
without the required submittal elements)
Zoning: Q+y S Pre-�1 hcation Conf.Request Form
� pp
Site Size: . G� �G 5 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWIN :
[✓r Baef Descripaon of the Proposal and any
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION site-specific questions/issues that you would
like to have staff research prior to the
l�ll of the information idenufied on this form are required to be submitted by meering.
the applicant and received by the Planning Division a m;n;mum of one (11 []�Site Plan. The site plan must show the
week grior to officially scheduling a �re-ag�lication conference date/time to proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn
allow staff ample time to prepare for the meeting. to scale. r11so, show the locarion of the
subject property in relation to the nearest
1�pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of the streets; and the locarions of drivewavs on the
Planrung Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday subject property and across the street.
momin�s. Pre-applicarion conferences are one (1� hour long and are typically �piciniry Map.
held between the hours of 9:00-11:00�1N1. q �
�The Proposed Uses. [�e.�GN /�"o�'�u�
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN �ToPographic Informauon. Include Contour
PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER
Lines if Possible. sc�rl•�L g(��.- c0�
FROM 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. �l�7`� 7
�1w/Jl/Jls.� rov��u!
�If the Pre-rlpplication Conference is for a '
IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE MONOPOLE project, the applicant must
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE attach a copy of the letter and proof in the
INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM form of an affidavit of mailing, that the
ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE collocauon protocol was completed (see
GROUP. Secrion 18.798.080 of the Tigard Community
Development Code).
� Filing Fee$370.00
� � � � �; _. �
� •
. ,,� ,
`; , '
�,. �` �
� , � -
►VE , ' _-�--- � � - -�� ��
, � � _ ,
� ` �
�f�T� ' ; �
� � �0 91�ST � � �� ,
� �
VE _ _J , -,-T--r �, .i
_- > % ' ,� , ,` -,.
\ ' i `� ' / //
� .' �
' ' , ` 07�
� . �
, .
., , `, � '
,
, - , i ,
., , ,
�
- - ` I / � /
��� � � � �� � � �
_ � �' � ��� -�� �� � � �
� ' ��� �
� , ; . � � ti /
i � `'` �� � � .�,�o_ �
; i _—.p � � ; % ; ; � , � � �
; , �
� � -, � � � �! �
�_� ��� ' - ,
�D � -- -
;�� � -'� � �� �� ' �
, , ,, _ � , , �
. ; ;; � ���,� �
( , - 'i ;�� J`�� � / \
` .
/
�
,
,
�
_
, , ,
�
,
,. . . -_ ;
• , - � : � ;,;%i �
,
� r,;;, / _,
; � - `�
�, /� ;/-_
�'
i � " � \
'i ;; �.� , '�, ,
� '/�% � � 1 � ;,':
'� � ;,%',�; �� �� �
� �/` ,��l, � �`�
� : .. /,,� � , ,�i 1 ,'
i %
;/��� , � ��
..- �
; ,
/i/i � ,/ � I
V � � i �./�i �.-._-=: �� . -
i i `
, : �� ,i��� � A
! /i�/i�
1 � /�jli
�//����
� � �/i i � "
�/i lii
j i��, �%i/�%i .�. � t:
- 1 /�%/%/� //i ' {
� �� ��///� � � / . .
i�_�
� ii �i� //�� \
\ � � j /.�� l( j:'�/i .
, : , i
�� : ,' � /- - � I
� i'�/ t� / /,�'
�• - � � �-• � :, �'., `
�.__.: , ��"� '� i / �i � i .j � , � ,
----� � ��
_ _ i ; '� , , � � �
C��t'Y O F T I GARD q
PRE-AP�`yLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ° 1
(Pre-l�pplicarion Meeting Notes are Valid far Six (6) Months) . � �
PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: UUg
STAFF AT PRE-APP.: � I�S�
RESIDENTIAL
APPLICANT: Vasile Repta AGENT: Doug Campbell
Phone: �503) 620-8558 Phone: �503) 229-4449
PROPERTY LOCATION:
:1DDRESS/GEI�ERIL LOC_1TIOI�: �1400 SW 9Oth AV2
T��L�P(s)/LOT#�s�: 1 S135DA02900
NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) - Minor Land Partition and Duplex
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: To divide one (1) lot into two (2). Keep the existinq sinqle-familv
home on Lot 1 and build a duplex on Lot 2.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MAP DESIGNATION: Low-Density Residential
ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: R-4.5
ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.5�
�1INI�1L'�i LOT SIZE: 7,500 (S� 10,000 (dUpleX) sq. ft. :�verage �tin. lot width: 50 S
90 (dupleX) ft.Max. building height: 30 (25 flag lOt) ft.
Setbacks: Front: 20 ft. Side: 5 ft. Rear: 15 ft. Corner: 15 ft. from street.
M.�IiVAJi�f SITE COVERr1GE: NA%. Minimum landscaped or natux�al vegetarion area: NA%.
G�R�-�GES: 20 ft.
� NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout)
TI I� ��PPLIC�NT SI Ir1LL NOTIIY ?�LL PROP�R'I'�' O��GN�RS �X'ITHIN 500 P��T, INT'�It�S'I`�D
PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two
(2) weeks between the mailing date and the meering date is required. Please re��iew the Land Use Nouficauon
handout concerning site posring and the meering norice. Meering is to be held�rior to submitrin��our a�licarion
or the a��licarion will not be acce�ted.
* NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meering with a Plans Examinet is
encouraged ptior to submittal of a land use application.
� NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390)
The �PPLIC�NT SH11LL SL'B�iIT r� N:�RR�ITIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval
standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9
Residential Application/Planning Division Section
incomplete and delay review o �proposal. The applicant should review :ode for applicable criteria.
� IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050)
As a part of the APPLIC�TION SL�B�fITT:�L REQL IRE�IENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE
IMI':�CT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact studv shall quanrif� the effect of the development on
public faciliries and ser�rices. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportarion system,including bikeways,
the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development.
For each public facilitv system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City
' standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public faciliues systems, and
affected private property users. In situations where the Communiry Development Code requires the dedication of
real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedicarion requirement, or provide
evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly propornonal to
the projected impacts of the development.
� ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.7G5)
Minimum number of accesses: 1. ��inimum access width: 15 ft.
Minimum pavement width: 10 ft.
❑ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.705)
Within all ATTr1CHED HOUSING (except two-famil�� dwellings) and mulri-family developments,each residenrial
dwelling SH1�I.I.BE CONNECTED BY W�1LKW11Y TO THE VEHICUI.�'�R P:�RKING r1R�?�, C01�1IVION
OPEN SP110E:1ND RECRE.'�TION F�'�CILITIES.
� RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION (Refer to Code Chapter 18.715) - SEE EXAMPLE BELOW.
The N�T RESIDENTI�L. UNITS r�I.I.OWED �n a parricular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of
the developable land by the minimum nutnber of square feet required per dwelling unit as specified by the
applicable zoning designarion. Net development area is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s) from
the gross site area:
r1ll sensirive lands areas includin�:
► Land within the 100-year floodplain;
► Slopes exceeding 25%;
► Drainageways;and
► `ti'edands for the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts.
Public right-of-way dedication:
► Single-family allocate 20% of gross acres for public facilities;or
► i�lulti-family allocate 15%ofgross acres for public faciliries;or
► If available, the actual public faciliry square footage can be used for deduction.
E�MPLE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCLLATIONS: (iJSING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE
(3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS)
Single-Family Multi Family
43,560 sq. ft.of gross site area 43,560 sq.ft.of gross site area
8 712 sq.ft. (20%) for�ublic right-of-wa� 6.534 sq.ft. (15°/o)for�ublic right-of-wa�;
NET: 34,848 square feet '�;ET: 37,026 square feet
- _�minimum lot areal - ��QjQ� �nimtim lot areal
= 11.4 Units Per Acre = 12.1 Uruts Per Acre
Note: The Development Code requires that the net site area exist for the next whole dwelling unit. NO ROUNDING UP IS
PERMITTED.
Note: Minimum Project Density is 80%of the maximum allowed density. TO DETERMINE THIS STANDARD,MULTIPLY
THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS BY.8.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9
Residential Applica6onlPlanning Division Section
� SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.730)
�_� STREETS: feet from the centerline of
��►' j FI��G LOT: �TEN (10)-FOOT SIDE Yr1RD SETB�CK applies to all primary structures.
�� ZERO LOT LINE LOTS: A minimum of a ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained between each
dwelling unit or garage.
► MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL building separarion standards apply within mulriple-family residenrial
developments.
ACCESSORY STRUCTCJRES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be perniitted on lots less than 2.5 acres in
size. Five (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines.
ACCESSORY S"1RL'C'1�JRE UP"1'U 1,U00 SQUAI�: f�'�:�"I'on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size.
(Note: See applicable zoning district for the primary structures' setback requirements.)
� FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730)
Mr1XIMUM HEIGHT OF 1'/z STORIES or 25 feet,whichever is less in most zones;2'/2 stories,or 35 feet in R-7,
R-12,R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Secrion 18.730.010.C? are satisfied.
� BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745)
In order TO INCRF�ISE PRIV:ICY�ND TO EITHER REDLCE OR ELI�7IN.1"I`E �DVERSE NOISE OR
VISUAL IMI'ACTS between adjacent developments,especially betcveen different land uses,the CITY REQUIRES
L.ANDSCAPED BUFFER r�REr'�S along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code
in terms of width. Buffer arcas must bc occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and
must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal planrings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be
required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may � be
occupied by vegetation, fences, utiliues, and walkways. Addirional informarion on required buffer area matenals
and sizes may be found in the Development Code.
The ESTIMr'�TED REOL'IRED BUFFERS a�licable to�our pro�osal area is:
Buffer Level A along north boundary. Buffer Level A along east boundary.
Buffer Level A along north boundary. Buffer Level A along east boundary.
IN ��DDITION, SIGHT OBSCL'RING SCREENING IS RE��UIRED �I,ONG: both sides of the flaq
ole. Is the existin hed e on the ro ert ? If so lease indicate it on the site lan and address it
when respondinq to 18.4 0.050.A.4.f .
� LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705)
STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALI. DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING Q,1�I A PUBl.i(' (�R
PRIVA"I'E STREET as well as drivewaXs which are more than 100 feet in len�th. Street trees must be placed either
within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees
must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees
should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity.
Further informarion on regularions affecring street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
r1 MINIMUM OT ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PL.ANTED in
and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include
special design features which effecrively screen the parking lot areas from view.
❑ RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755)
r�pplicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE Hr,ULER FOR REVIE��' r1ND APPROVAI. OF SITE
SERVICING COMPr,TIBILITY. Locaung a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the
intersecrion of two (2) drivewavs within a parking lot is prohibited. i�luch of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's
Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9
Residential Applica6on/Planning Division Section
� PARKING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 & 18.705)
.1LL P:�RI�ING �REAS AND DRIVEW'?�YS M[JST BE P�1`'ED.
► Single-family............Requires: One(1) off-street parking space per dwelling unit;and
One (1) space per unit less than �00 square feet.
► �1ulri�le-family.........Re9uires: 127 spaces per unit for 1 bedroom;
1.� spaces per unit for 2 bedrooms;and
1.7� spaces per unit for 3 bedrooms.
Mulri-family dwelling units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide parking for the use of guests and shall
consist of 15% of the total required parking.
NO MORE THr1N 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES i��Y BE DESIGNr1T`ED AND/OR DIMENSIONED r�S
COMPACT SPr�CES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows:
► Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet,6 inches.
► Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches.
► Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled
person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided,as well as
the parking stall dunensions, is mandated by the rlmericans with Disabiliries Act (ADA). A handout is
available upon request. � handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface
and an appropriate sign shall be posted.
❑ BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765)
BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR i�ILTLTI-F�MILY, COi�1MERCIr1L r�ND INDL'STRIr�L
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient
locations.
❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775)
The Code pro�rides REGULr1TIONS FOR I.�1NDS WHICH ARE POTENTIr1I.LY L;NSUITr1BLE FOR
D�;V�:LOl'M�:NT llU�: TU r1REAS WITHIN THE 100-YEr1R FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL
DRr,INr�GEWAYS,WETLAND AREr�S,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE
GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-applicadon conference based
on available information. HOWEVER, the res�onsibilit� to �recisel� identif� sensirive land areas, and their
boundaries, is the res�onsibility of the a�licant. r,reas meering the definirions of sensirive lands must be clearl�
indicated on�lans submitted with the develo�ment a�licarion.
Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas.
RESIDF.NT'IAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED V�'ITHIN FLOODPI.�IINS.
❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.070.C)
When STEEP SLOPES e�st, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which
addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Communiry Development Code Secuon 18.775.080.C. The report
shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendarions for achieving
the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.
� CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Ret'er co CWS RBto 07-2o/USA Regularions-Chapter 3)
L.r�ND DEVELOPMENT �1DJ�CENT TO SENSITIVE :1RE��S shall preserve and maintain or create a
vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water qualiry functioning of the sensitive area.
Design Criteria:
The VEGETr�TED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the
required widths:
(See Table 3.1 on following page)
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicaaon Conference Notes Page 4 of 9
Residential ApplicatioNPlanning Division Section
, ,
TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS
SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20
SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED
TO SENSITIVE AREA' CORRIDOR PER SIDEZ
♦ Streams��rith u�termittcnt flo�c draining: c���-�
� 10 to <50 acxes � 1� feet
� 25 feet
>50 to <100 acres
♦ Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet
♦ E�sting or created wedands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet
♦ Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow
♦ Streams with internvttent flow draining>100 acres
♦ Natural lakes and onds
♦ Streams with internuttent flow drainuig: >25%
� 10 to <50 acres 30 feet
I 50 feet
>50 to <100 acres
♦ Existing or created wetlands >25% �'ariable from 50-200 feet. �feasure in 25-
♦ Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to
♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in<2�%slope),
♦ Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet ast the to of ravine3
ltitartin�point for measurement=cdge of thc defined channel(bankful Flow) Eor streams/ri�-ers,dclineatcd wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or a�•erage
Ftigh water for]akes-or ponds,whichecer offers greatr•st resource protection. Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the rirer/stream or wetland cegetated
comdor,shall not sen-e as a startinR point for measurcKnent.
ZVegeca[ed comdor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vege[a�ed corridoi is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition.
�1'he vegetated corridor estends 35 fcct from thc top of the ra�-ine and sets the outer boundary of the cegetatcd corridor. "fhe 35 feet may bc ceduced to 15 feet,if a stamped
gcotechnieal report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with thc reduced set6ack Exom the top oEra��ine.
Restricrions in the Vegetate Corridor:
NO structures, development, construction acuvides, gardens, lawns, applicarion of chemicals, dumping of any
materials of any kind, or other activiries shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality
protecuon provided by the vegetated corridor,exc•ept as prnvided for zn the US� Desi�n and Canstruction Standarr�r.
Locarion of Ve�etated Corridor:
IN r1NY RESIDENTII�I. DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE Pr�RCELS or lots intended for
separate ownership,such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not
be a part of an��parcel to be used for the construcrion of a dwelling unit.
�—e�'S Sen-ice Provider I,etrer�
PRIOR TO SL'Bi�1I : L o�a y land use applicarions, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter
which will outline the condiuons necessary to comply with the C�x'S R&O 07-20 sensirive area requirements. If
there are no sensirive areas,CWS must srill issue a letter stating a CV�'S Sen�ice Provider Letter is not required.
❑ SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780)
SIGN PER�ti2ITS MUST BE OBTr�INED PRIOR TO INSTr1LI.ATION OF ANY SIGN in the Ciry of Tigard.
A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code
standards may be pemiitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review applicauon.
rllternativelv,a Sign Code Rxception applicaaon may be filed for Director's review.
� TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Plan
Requirements Handout" included in your pre-application conference packet)
:� "1'REE PL..�N FOR THE PI.�NTING,REMOV�L 1�ND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified
arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application
for a subdivision, parririon, site development review, planned development, or condirional use is filed.
PROTECTION IS PREFERIt�D OV�R REMOVr1L WHEREVER POSSIBLE (Address all items in the City's
Tree Plan Requirements Handout).
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9
Residential ApplicationlPlanning Division Section
THE TREE PLAN SH.�I.L 1 LUDE the following:
► Idenrificarion of the location,size,species,and condirion of all exisring trees greater than 6-inch caliper.
► Idenufication of a program to save exisring trees or miri�ate tree removal ovcr 12 inchcs in caliper.
Mirigarion must follow the replacement gLUdelines of Secuon 18.790.060.D according to the follov�nng
standards and shall be exclusive of trees required b�� other development code provisions for landscaping,
streets and parking lots:
• Retainage of less than 25% of exisring trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a miugarion program
according to Secuon 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees;
• Retainage of from 25 to 50% of e�sting trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of
the trees to be removed be mirigated according to Secuon 18.790.060.D.;
• Retainage of from 50 to 75% of e�sting trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the
trees to be removed be mirigated according to Secuon 18.790.060.D.;
• Retainage of 7�% or greater of exisring trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mirigauon;
► Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed;and
► �� protecuon program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees
during and after construction.
Z'REES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEr,R PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT
APPLICr1TION LISTED r�BOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced
according to Secrion 18.790.060.D.
� MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E.)
R�;PLACFMENT OF r1 TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines:
► A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics.
► If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the
Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value.
► If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable,
the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula:
• The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of
the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees.
If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one
(1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other properry within the ciry,either public property or,
with the consent of the owner,private property.
► The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to
matunty.
IN LIEU OF TREE REPLc'10Ei�NT under Subsecrion D of this secrion, a party may,with the consent of the
Director,elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement.
� CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795)
The City requires that CLEAR VISION r�REAS BE Mr�INT:�INED BETWEEN THREE (3) r1ND EIGHT (8)
FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the rec�uired clear
vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any exisring obstrucrions unthin the clear
vision area. The applicant shall show the clear�rision areas on the site plan, and identif�� an�� obstructions in these
areas.
� FUTURE STREET PLAN AND EXTENSION OF STREETS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.030.F.)
A Ft"Iti'RF STRF,F.T PI�1N shall:
► Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan shall
show the pattem of e�usting and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division
and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 200 feet
surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division.
► Idenrify exisring or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and pedestrian
faciliues on or within 500 feet of the site.
Where necessary to give access or pernzit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to
the boundaty lines of t�ie tract to be developed.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9
Residential ApplicationlPlanning Division Section
� ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060)
i�1INI�1L�i LOT FRON I:�GE: 2� feet unless lot is created through the minor land paruuon process.
Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 1� feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide
access easement.
The DEPTH OF r1LL LOTS SI-IAI_L NOT EXCEED 2'/z TIMES THE r1VERr1GE�'IDTH,unless the parcel
is less than 1'/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
� BLOCKS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.090)
The perimeter of BLOCKS FORMED BY S"1REETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured along the
right-of-way center line except where street location is precluded by natural topography, wedands or other bodies
of water or,pre-exisring development.
`�'hen block lengths greater than 330 feet are permitted,pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided through the l�lock.
CODE CHAPTERS
� 18.330(Conditiona�use) ❑ �8.6ZO(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 'I H.76O(Nonconforming Situationsy
❑ 18.340(Directors�nterpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regiona�Center) � 'I H.TF)5(Off-Street ParkinglLoading Requirements)
❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.640(Durham cluarry Design Standards) ❑ 'I 8.775(Sensitive Lands Rev'iew)
❑ 18.360(s�te�eve�oprr�e�t Re��ew) � 18.705{Access�gress��ircu�ation} ❑ 18.780(Sgns)
❑ 18.370{vanances�,4djustrnents) ❑ 18.71 O(/+coessory Residentia�Units) ❑ 'I 8.7H5(Temporary Use PertniCs)
❑ �8.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendmen�s) � 18.715(Density Computations) � 18.790 Rree Remova�)
❑ �H.3S5(Miscellaneous Permits) � 'I H.�ZO(Design Compatibility Standards) � 18.795(Visua�C�earance Areas)
� 'I 8.390(Decision Malang Proceduresllmpad Study) ❑ 'I H.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wire�ess Communication Faa�ities>
❑ 'I 8.4'I O(Lot Line Adjustrnents) � 'I 8.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) � 18.81 O(Street 8 Utility Improvement Standards)
� 18,420(�and Partitions) ❑ 18.740(Historic Over�ay)
❑ 18.430(subdivisions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Pertni�)
� 18.51 O(Residential Zoning Districts) � 18.745(�andscaping 8 Screening Standards)
❑ 18.520(Commercaal Zoning Districts) ❑ 'I 8.750(ManufacturedMtobil Home Regulations)
❑ 1$.530(Industrial Zoning Districis) ❑ 18.755(M�ed so��d waste�ec,yd��9 stora9e)
ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS:
Please consider the possible conditions of approval in Section 18.330.030.B that the Hearings Officer mav
require. In addition, neighbors may be sensitive to the proposal of a duplex. Please indicate on the plan and
discuss the type of screening that will be provided. Concerning trees, please provide specific methods
(approved bv the project arborist) as to how trees will be protected. Please show an actual buildinq footprint
beinq considered for the duplex, rather than just the building envelope, that will be placed to maximize the
retention of viable trees. Concerning trees not subject to mitiaation (12 caliper inches and less), the City still
prefers retention. If you have questions concerninq the tree plan, Citv Arborist is Todd Praqer (503) 718-
2700.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9
Residential Applica6on/Planning Division Section
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9
Residential Application/Planning Division Section
PROCEDURE
Administrative Staff Review.
Public hearing before the Land lise Hearings Officer.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Corrunission makin� a recommendation on the
proposal to the Ciry Council. :�n addirional public hearing shall be held by the City Council.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS
r1ll :1PPLIC��TIONS �1LST BE .-�CCEPTED BY :-� PL:-�tiNING DI`'ISION ST�FF �1E�fBER of the
Communit�� De�-elopment Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: ApUlications submitted
� mail or dro�ed off at the counter without Planning Division acce�tance may be returned. The
Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM.
Maps submitted with an a�lication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/z" x 11". One, 8'/z" x 11" ma� of
a �ro�osed �roject shall also be submitted for attachment to the staff re�ort or administrative decision.
A��lications with unfolded ma�s shall not be acce�ted.
The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the applicauon and will
deterniine whether an applicarion is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will norify the
applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required.
The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur appro�cimately 45 to 60 days after an application is
accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applicaaons involving difficult or protracted issues or
requiring review by other jurisdicrions mav take addirional time to review. Written recommendarions from the
Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land
use decisions. r1n appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard City Couneil. r'� basic flow chart which
illustrates the re�-iew process is available from the Planning Division upon request.
Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less
than 10 days prior to the public hearing.
This PRE-r�PPLICr1TION CONFERENCE r1ND THE NOT`ES OF THE CONFERENCE �RE
INTENDED TO INFORl�1 the prospecrive applicant of the primary Communiry Development Code
requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the Ciry staff and prospecrive
applicant to discuss the opportuniries and constraints affecting development of the site.
SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION (Washington County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884)
PRIOR TO SUBMITTING r� SUBDIVISION L..�ND USE ?�PPLICATTON with the Ciry of Tigard, applicants
are rec�uired to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office
in order to obtain approval/reservarion for any subdivision name. rlpplicarions will not be accepted as complete
until the Cin�receives the faxed confirmation of appro��al from the Counn�of the Subdivision Name Reservarion.
BUILDING PERMITS
PL�NS FOR BUILDING��ND OTHER REI.��TED PERl�1ITS�l'ILL NOT BE 11CCEPT`ED FOR REVIE�x'
UNTIL :� I.AND USE ?�PPROVr1L H�S BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building
Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These
pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or
modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to
determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as
proposed.
Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Parutions where any structure to be demolished has
system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when
the new plat is recorded, the Ci ,r's �olic� is to a�l�r those s�stem develo�menr credits to the first building
ermit issued in the develo ment (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT
HE TIME THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED).
CIN OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9
Residential Application/Planning Division Sec6on
PLEASE NOTE:
The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and asPects related to site planning
that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide informarion
required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is
recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the C�mmunity Development
Code or ask any quesrions of City staff relarive to C�de requirements prior to submitting an
applicarion.
AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN
APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AF'I'ER A
PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as
unnecessary by the Planning Division).
PREPARED BY: Emil�Eng.Assistant Planner
CITY OF TIG�'1RD PL��NNING DIVISION
PHONE: 503-639-4171 Fr�X: 503-6243681 DIRECT: 503-718-2712
ENIAIL: er�ilv@rigard-or.gov
TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIG�RD'S COtiL'�1UNIT�'DE�'ELOP:��NT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.tigard-or.gov
H:\patty\masters\Pre-l�pp Notes Residential.doc Updated: 27-Feb-08
(Engineering section:preapp.en�
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 10 of 9
Residential ApplicaGon/Planning Division Section
Cheryl Caines
From: Doug Campbell (doug@cpd-services.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:28 PM
To: Cheryl Caines
Subject: RE: Repta Partition
Cheryl, I talked with the engineer again and had him verify his area calculations based on the survey information and the
current plans. Please see the revised parcel numbers below based on factoring out the ROW and flag pole area. We had
originally factored out the fiag pole area in showing the parcel size on the plans for Parcel 2, but the engineer did not
show the area of the flag pole separately as well didn't factor out the frontage dedication of 2 feet for Parcel 1. Sorry for
the confusion. Hope this answers your questions.
Total SF of Parcel = 26,786 sf (parcel 1 = 15,452; Parcel 2 = 11,334)
ROW dedication for Parcel 1 = 259 sf
ROW dedication plus flag pole area for Parcel 2 = 888 sf
Net area = 25,639 sf
Parcel 1 = 15,452—259sf = 15,193 sf
Parcel 2 (flag Lot) = 11,334sf—888sf= 10,446 sf
Doug Campbell
Campbell Planning and Development
Ph: 503-229-4449
Fax: 503-297-3537
Cell: 503-539-9994
From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc@tigard-or.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:36 AM
To: 'Doug Campbell'
Subject: RE: Repta Partition
Doug,
Will you please show the density calculations as outlined below?
Gross square footage
- ROW Dedication
-Access flag for Parcel 2
-Sauare foota�e of lot for the existin� home (Parcel 1)
= Net square footage
Thank you.
Cheryl
From: Doug Campbell [mailto:doug@cpd-services.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 12:58 PM
To: Cheryl Caines
Subject: RE: Repta Partition
�
. .
Cheryl, The deck is about 2 feet tall, the calculation for density should be as i� _,�own on the plans or 25,895. We
look forward in getting your final approval. thanks
Doug Campbell
Campbell Planning and Development
Ph: 503-229-4449
Fax: 503-297-3537
Cell: 503-539-9994
From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc@tigard-or.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, ]uly 29, 2008 11:13 AM
To: "'Doug Campbell" <doug@cpd-services.com> (doug@cpd-services.com)'
Subject: Repta Partition
Doug,
I'm trying to complete the Planning Division review and had a couple of simple questions.
1) The deck encroaches into the rear yard setback. What is the height of the deck?
2) Under Density Computations the net square footage is listed as 25,879. If I add the square footages of Parcels 1
& 2 together I get 25,895. Can you please show the calculations that led to the 25,879?
I'm waiting for interoffice comments at this point and will get this issued as soon as I can.
Thank you,
Cheryl Caines
Associate Planner
Ciry of Tigard
(503) 718-2437
2
Cheryl Caines
From: Doug Campbell [doug@cpd-services.comj
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 10:18 AM
To: Cheryl Caines
Subject: RE: Repta Partition
Attachments: Adjustment letter.pdf.tif; Adjustment letter.doc
Here is the response regarding the adjustment to the cul-de-sac standards, 18.810.030 L. Let me know if you have any
comments regarding the letter or additional points that could be made to help support the request. I think I've made a
good argument for supporting the adjustment. I will have the owner drop off a check for the fee today or tomorrow AM.
I've requested the additional mailing labels and will submit them next week most likely. The applicant agrees to a 30 day
extension for the re-noticing and the processing of the adjustment. Thanks
Doug Campbell
Campbell Planning and Development
Ph: 503-229-4449
Fax: 503-297-3537
Cell: 503-539-9994
From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc@tigard-or.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, Z008 9:23 AM
To: 'Doug Campbell'
Subject: Repta Partition
Doug,
I got some comments from the Engineering Division today. Code section 18.810.030.L (Cul-de-sacs) states that a cul-de-
sac can provide access to no more than 20 dwelling units.
There is no way to comply with the standard. You will need to apply for an adjustment to the street improvement
standards. Please supply a supplemental narrative addressing 18.370.020.C.11. A fee is required of$307.50. The
adjustment requires re-noticing. I will need additional labeled envelopes with postage to send out the decision. We will
use the existing envelopes for the re-notice. I have attached the label request form for your convenience.
Would it be possible for the applicant to grant a 30 day extension since we have to re-notice? My purpose with the
extension is not to hold up the decision, but to provide enough time for the notice/hearing if the project is appealed. I
will finish the decision and have it waiting for the end of the comment period.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Cheryl Caines
r�ssociate Planner
City of Tigard
(503) 718-2437
1
.
��'�CCP&D
Campbell Planning and Development,Inc.
August 7, 2008
Cheryl Caines
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: Repta Partition ( Case File No. MLP2008-00005)
Adjustment for Street Improvement Requirements
Dear Ms. Caines:
In response to your request to further address the street improvement requirements and the
requirements that restrict number of lots on a cul-de-sac (code section 18.810.030.L , Cul-de-
sacs), I am providing this supplemental letter and narrative addressing the adjustment criteria
for street improvements and the cul-de-sac standards.
The code section 18.810.030 L (cul-de-sacs) states the following:
"L. Cul-de-sacs. A cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long shall not provide access to
greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical
constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code
preclude street extension and through circulation"
The Lomita Avenue and cul-de-sac length is 800 feet long and includes greater than 20 units when
counting the multifamily property,the Park Place Apartments,which has 88 apartment units. It
should be noted that the primary access to the Park Place Apartments is from 88`h Avenue and that a
majority of the parking and access to the residential units is from 88`�Avenue where its main office is
located and where deliveries and access to most of the apartments is located. There appears to be
only limited use of Lomita Avenue which is considered a secondary/emergency access for the
apartments. Not accounting for the secondary access for the apartments there are only 18 single
family homes/lots that access onto Lomita Avenue meeting the current standard of 20 units. Two
lots face onto 90�'Avenue and take their access from 90�'Avenue.
Lomita Avenue has a 50 foot R-O-W with approximately 32 foot pavement width meeting standards
for a local residential street, and the cul-de-sac ha.s a R-O-W of 40 foot radius with a 30 foot paved
radius. The cul-de-sac is designed to handle the current number of units and traffic load on the street.
3851 SW 50`h Avenue; Portland,OR 97221 �Phone: 503-229-4449�Fax:503-297-3537
• � .
�' Repta Partition—Adjustme. �quest
Page 2
"I1. Adjustments for street improvement requirements (Chapter 18.810).
By means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, the Director shall approve,
approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment to the street improvement requirements,
based on_findings that the following criterion is satisfied: Strict application oJthe standards will
result in an unacceptably adverse impact on existing development, on the proposed development, or
on natural features such as wetlands, bodies of water, significant habitat areas, steep slopes or
existing mature trees. In approving an adjustment to the standards, the Director shall determine that
�he potential adverse impacts exceed the public benefits of strict application of the standards. (Ord.
06-20)"
The applicant maintains that the existing property has a legal 15 foot platted flag pole access onto the
Lomita Avenue cul-de-sac as is shown on the recorded plat and survey pro��ided with the application.
The access point and flag pole frontage is a pre-existing condition and was designed into the original
platted cul-de-sac. This location is the most logical access point to the rear of the propeRy for the
proposed partition, of which the existing plat allows.
The only alternative access point to the rear of the property would be on the north side of the house
from 90`h Avenue. Accessing the property from the north side of the house would cause unnecessary
adverse impacts to the Repta property, existing house and side yard. There would be increased
impacts to numerous mature trees along the north side of the property, including adverse impacts to
large conifers along the property line located on the adjacent property. An access drive from 90`n
Avenue would require the removal of a storage shed which the property owner is planning on keeping
under the current plan. There would also be additional costs in construction of the driveway from 90`h
Avenue, requiring some fill and additional paving costs_ There will also be additional costs
associated with tree mitigation.
The applicant believes there are minimal to no real impacts associated with approving this partition
and the access drive onto Lomita Avenue. The roadway is designed to handle the existing traffic and
additional trips would be minimal with the additional single family home. There are no real
perceived adverse impacts to public health or welfare with the addition of one house accessing onto
Lomita Avenue. The property is currently oriented with a legal flag access of 15 feet onto Lomita
Avenuc making the most sensible access point for the rear of the property,which was previously
planned as part of the original plat when the Lomita Avenue constructed and platted. Also having
one less driveway onto 90`�'Avenue and the few additional trips created froin the additional house
directed to the stop sign at 90`''Avenue/Lomita Avenue would be preferable. For the reasons stated
above the applicant requests approval of the adjustment to the cul-de-sac standard(18.810.030 L)
allowing the additional residential unit as proposed onto Lomita Avenue.
Sincerely,
Douglas Campbell, AICP
Campbell Planning and Development, Inc.
3851 SW 50`�'Avenue;Portland,OR 97221 �Phone: 503-229-4449�Fax: 503-297-3787
Cheryl Caines
From: Doug Campbell [doug@cpd-services.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 12:12 PM
To: Cheryl Caines
Subject: RE: Repta
They were approved for the use by the state and county including parking. They have a total of 7 spaces 5 in front of the
house and 2 spaces in the garage. The approval is for 5 residents, no double occupancy.
Doug Campbell
Campbell Planning and Development
Ph: 503-229-4449
Fax: 503-297-3537
Cel I: 503-539-9994
From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc@tigard-or.gov]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 11:58 AM
To: 'Doug Campbell'
Subject: Repta
Doug,
One more thing about the group living...it requires more parking according to 18.765—table 1. If the home is set up
where each resident has a room then it is 1.0 spaces per room. If there is more than 1 bed in each, then it is 2.5 spaces
per bed. Please include this information in your e-mail.
Cher�•1 Caines
�ssociatc Planncr
Ciry of Tigard
(503) 718-2437
1
Cheryl Caines
From: Doug Campbell [doug@cpd-services.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 11:59 AM
To: Cheryl Caines
Subject: RE: Repta Partition
As a follow-up to your e-mail above I believe we discussed the use of the current residence and I've verified with Mr.
Repta that the existing resident is being used for senior care for a total of 5 residents including the owners. He
acknowledged that there was no plans to do additional senior group housing and the intent is to divide the property as
proposed for a single family home lot. Hope this clears up your question regarding use.
Doug Campbell
Campbell Planning and Development
Ph: 503-229-4449
Fax: 503-297-3537
Cell: 503-539-9994
From: Cheryl Caines [mailto:cherylc@tigard-or.gov]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 10:06 AM
To: 'Doug Campbell'
Subject: Repta Partition
Doug,
We received the attached letter regarding the uses on the Repta property. Please provide accurate information about
the use of the current home and whether the new residence will also be an adult care facility. How many residents in
each? I need to make sure the decision is going out with the correct uses and not list them as single-family residences.
Thank you.
Cheryl Caines
Associate Planner
City of Tigard
(503) 718-2437
�
. �
r�,•
City of 1 zgard, Oregon - 13125 SWHaII Blvd. • Tiga�u, OR 97223
M
11
-
January 29, 2010
' � �
Vasile Repta
11400 SW 90`''?���enue
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: Minor Land Parririon Extension Request (l�7LP2008-00005)
Dear Mr. Repta,
Per your application letter dated 01/28/2010,you have requested a one year extension for the
approval of a minor land parririon (i�1LP2008-00005) with an effecrive date of September 1 G, 2008.
MLP2008-00004 was approved on June 25, 2008 with an effective date of July 11, 2008 and is valid
for an eighteen month period through January 11, 2010. The requested extension would be for one
year or until January 11, 2011.
The applicant submitted a written request on January 29, 2010 and paid the �266 application fee.
The Tigard �lunicipal Code Section 18.420.030 includes the following criteria for extensions:
(D) The Director shall, upon written request by the applicant and payment of the required
fee,grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed one year provided that:
1. No changes are made on the original plan as approved by the Director.
The applicant states no changes have been made to the appro�-ed plan. Therefore, the request is
consistent with this criterion.
2. The applicant can show intent of recording the approved partition within the one year
extension period, and
The applicant states "the plat is 95% complete and requests an extension to allow time to get public
improvements permitted and constructed to file the plat". Therefore, the request is consistent with
this criterion.
MLP2008-00005 Repta Partition Extension 012910 Page 1
Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772
. ,
7
�
3. There have been no changes in the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and
ordinance provisions on which the approval was based.
Based on re�-iew of plans and the applicarion for eYtension, staff concurs with the applicant and
finds that no substantive, applicable changes have occurred to the Tigard Development Code on
�vhich the approval was based. Therefore, the request is consistent with this criterion.
Conclusion:
The applicant has submitted a written request and paid the application fee. The criteria for
extensions have been met as indicated in the findings aboee. Therefore, the Applicant is granted an
extension for i�tLP2008-00005 not to exceed one��ear or until February 16,2011.
r
1
,�'V- �'�rv' r`�—y'ic�
Darrel "Hap"Watkins Date
Assistant Planner
MLP2008-00005 Repta Partition Extension 012910 Page 2
. ^
RECEIV�D
January 28,2010 ,JAN 2 9 2010
CITY C�F TIGARD
Ms. Cheryl Caines PL�,!Vh�i�",�I�NrINEEAING
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: Case File No. MLP2008-00005
Dear Cheryl:
I would like to request a one-year extension on the behalf of the above referenced project
per code section 18.420.030.D of the Tigard Development Code that will expire on
March 16,2010.
We are currently working on completing the public improvements plans and the plat that
is completed with the exception of geodetic ties to meet Condition 19. Once we
completed our coordination with the franchise utility companies we will turn in
immediately the public improvement plan for review and approval and proceed with the
construction of the PFI improvements.
Code Responses
18.420.030.D. Exten.sion. The director shall, upon written request by the applicant and
puyment qf the required fee, grant an extension of the approval period not to excecd onc
year pravided that:
Response—The required fee of$266.00 is included with this request for extension.
18.420.030 D 1. No chunges are made on the original plan us approved by the Director:
Response—No changcs were made to the original plan as was approved by the Director.
This statement still holds true even after our finding of coordinating with franchise utility
companies.
18.420.030 D 2. The upplicant can show intent of recording the approved�artition or lot
line adjustment within one year period.•
Response—As stated above the plat is 95% complete and goal would be to just request
this extension to allow time to get public improvements permitted and constructed to file
the plat. The applicant would like to get the plat recorded as soon as possible.
� �
18.420.030 D 3. There have been no changes in the applicable Comprehensive Plan
policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based.
Response—To the best of our knowledge there has been no changes in the applicable
Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions for the approved project.
Again, based on the requirements for granting a one-year extension we would like to
request on the behalf of that you extend MLP2008-00005 until March 16,2011 to allow
enough time to complete the public improvements and file the Partition with Washington
County Surveyors office.
Sincerely,
Vasile Repta
G�, '�' � ,�
CITY OF TIGARG RECEIPT
_ n
13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223
503.639.4171
. �
Receipt Number: 176729 - 01/29/2010
CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID
MLP2008-00005 Approval Extension 1003100-43116 $232.00
MLP2008-00005 Approval Extension-LRP 1003100-43117 $34.00
Total: �266.00
PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT
Credit Card 464270 STREAT 01/29/2010 $266.00
Payor: Vasile Repta
Total Payments: $266.00
Balance Due: $4,525.50
Page 1 of 1
City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 S�Hall Blvd. • Tig�. OR 97223
��
� s�-.
.
�
:�
�� 0
June 28, 2010
Mr. Vasile Repta
11400 SW 90th Ave.
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: Subdivision case number: ML.P2008-00005
Mr. Repta:
On April 27, 2010 the Tigard City Council passed an ordinance to amend the Tigard Communiry
Development Code (TDC) chapters 18.360 Site Development Review, 18.420 Land PaYtitions, and
18.430 Subdivisions. The approved amendments were in xesponse to the economic downturn.
Automaric extensions were granted to these three types of land use cases that would expire during a
certain time frame. Our records indicate that you received approval for a Minor Land Partition
(MLP) that may have been affected by this code amendment (see case number above).
If your appxoved MLP has a lapsing date between)uly 1, 2008 and December 31, 2011, then the
approval is automatically extended through December 31, 2012. The new approval period will lapse
after this date i£ 1) the partition has not been recorded or has been improperly recorded with
Washington County without the satisfactory completion of all conditions attached to the approval;
or 2) the fmal recording is a departure from the approved plan.
No action is required on your part for the extension because it is automaric. A copy of this letter
will be placed in the land use file. A copy of the ordinance with adopted language for Land
Partitions is enclosed. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the extension or code
amendment, please contact me at (503) 718-2437 or cherylc a�,tigard-or.gov.
Sincerely,
� n �
��J
Cheryl Caines
Associate Planner
Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772
�
.
.
� � �
City of Tigard
'I'hursda��, October 18, 2012
�'asile Repta
11400 SW 90�h �'��-enue
'1'igard, OR 97223
RI?: NO"1'ICE OF I:�Pix.A'1'iON Ul�'L�1Nll USI-� ��1'Px(��'.�1L.
Project Type: �Tinor Land I'artition
Project Name: Repta I'artition
Project Number: �iLP2008-00005
Tax Lot Number: 1S135D1�-2900
Expiration Date: Dcccmber 31, 2012
Dear �1r. Repta:
The purpose of this letter is to sen�e as a courtesy reminder that the Land Use l�pproval
listed above ��ill expire at close of business, �londa��, December 31, 2012.
In recognition c�f the effects of the ecc�nomic do�vnturn, the '1'igard Ciri� Council passed
De��elopment Code ��mendment (DCI�) 2010-00001 on ��pri127, 2010 to e�tend until
December 31, 2012 the Land Usc .lppro��als for Site Dei-elo�ment Re�-ie�vs and �finor Land
Partitions that other���ise �vould ha�-e espired between Jul�� 1, 2008 and December 31, 2011.
This is incorporatcd in Tigard �lunicipal Code 18.420.030.D.2 which statcs that: "1-�ppro�-al
periods for land partitions lapsin� between jul�� 1, 2008 and Deccmbcr 31, 2011 shall be
autoinaticall�� extended throu�h December 31, 2012. No further e�tensions will be granted."
1�lccordin� tc� our recoYds, y�our c�ri�inal appro�-a1 for the above project would ha�re expired
durin� that July 1, 20U8 — l�ecember 31, 2011 period and that ap}�roval was, therefore,
eYtcnded by DCI�2010-000O1 until December 31, 2012. No further catension is aeailable.
You can secure your Land Use ��ppro�-al against e�piradon if��ou submit a rec�rded final
plat t� this office prior to close of business, �londa�-, December 31, 2012. Please let us
kno�c if vou anticipate submittin� a recorded plat. �
Sincerel�
.�lbert Shiclds
Program De�-elopment �pecialist
13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171
TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov