Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPDR2001-00003 • a ,. 120 DAYS=11/14/2001 CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Case Numbers: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(PDR) 2001-00003 MINOR MODIFICATION (MMD) 2001-00010 Case Name: BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM &TEMPLE Name of Owner: Brahma Premananda Ashram Attn: Sam Additiwar Name of Applicant's Rep.: Alpha Engineering, Inc. Attn: Shelley Holly, Project Planner Address of Rep.: 9600 SW Oak Street, Suite 230 Portland, Oregon 97223 Address of Property: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard (West side of SW Hall Blvd., north of SW Pacific Hwy.) Tax Map/Lot Nos.: Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503 . • A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND MINOR MODIFICATION. THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANTS PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 20, 2001 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FAGS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: > A request for approval to modify the previous approval for development of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential dormitory for Monks) and a 9,000 square foot Temple. Although the Ashram building proposal has not changed from the previous approval, the design and location of the Temple building have changed, thus requiring a new Planned Development Review and a Minor Modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit. Zoning Designation: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Action: > ❑ Approval as Requested © Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: © Owners of Record Within the Required Distance © Affected Government Agencies © The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 23, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 7, 2001. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. • a , „ „ , „ NOTICE OF FINALORDER NO.:2001-03 PC ,, ' • BY THE PLANNING.COMMISSION CITY OF nGARO: . Comniiunity Development FOR:THE CITY,OF TIGARD,OREGON SFtdping`ABetterCo nmunity A FINAL ORDER APPROVING A LAND USE APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE TO CONSTRUCT A TEMPLE AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING ASHRAM (TEMPLE) TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL USE OF TWO (2) BEDROOMS FOR THE RESIDENTS AND EIGHT (8) GUESTROOMS, AS WELL AS, A MINOR MODIFICATION TO RELOCATE AND RE-DESIGN THE BUILDINGS. THE COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THIS APPLICATION ON AUGUST 20, 2001. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS BASED THEIR DECISION ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. 120 DAYS = 11/14/2001 SECTION 1. APPLICATION SUMMARY. FILE NAME: BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM & TEMPLE ADDITION (A.K.A. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA ASHRAM &TEMPLE) CASE NOS.: Planned Development (PDR) PDR2001-00003 Minor Modification (MMD) MMD2001-00010 APPLICANT/ Brahma Premananda Ashram PLANNING Alpha Engineering OWNERS: Attn: Sam Additiwar CONSULTANT: Shelley Holly, Planner 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Plaza West, Suite 230 Tigard, OR 97223 9600 SW Oak Street Portland, OR 97223 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Planned Development design approval and a Minor Modification to Conditional Use permit (CUP1999-00001) for a 9,000 square foot temple and an expansion of the existing Ashram to allow residential use of two (2) bedrooms for the residents and eight (8) guestrooms. The original design was considered as part of PDR1999-00002. LOCATION: The subject site is located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION t _th =:a: licable proposed: evelopment; rtee s . . . Thee ,Planning .COmrriission.:."finds that::the - ro osed:'.d approval c riteria of�the Tigard-.Community.,Development';Code and that the proposal,�will.;not adversely,_affect-;'the- health, .safety. and welfare of the City. The Planning :Commission;: therefore;:APPROVES the requested Land Use Application to-the.following=conditions: .of approval: BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION . PAGE 1 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE=`FOLLOWING`CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED,PRIOR:TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR=BUILDING PERMITS: (Unless,otherwise noted,,the:Staff contact shall;be BRIAN'RAGER,.Engineering Department 503-639-417.1.) ` Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kirby, 639-4171, ext. 388) for review and approval: 1. Submit a floor plan that shows the total area dedicated for living facilities (guestrooms and resident's rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet. 2. The applicant shall continue to comply with the attached conditions of approval of CUP 1999-00001. 3. The applicant shall place a six-foot cyclone fence with site obscuring slats along those property lines that are adjacent to residential uses. 4. Submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant shall submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. 5. Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays subject to the parking agreement with the office complex to the North. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30. 7. Additional right-of-way (ROW) shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, right-of-way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 8. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will provide an on-site water detention facility designed to meet Clean Water Services Design Standards. 9. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96- 44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 10. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $880 and it shall be paid prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit. THE":"FOLLOWIN ONDITI'ONS"`SHALL BEi:'SATISFIED PRIOR TO=A':FINAL'BUILDING,INSPECTION:`": BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 2 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 11. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext. 388) for review and approval: 12. Construct all improvements as shown on the approved plans. Any modifications to plans must be approved by the Planning Division PRIOR to the modification. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN48MONTHS THE.:EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S'DECISION c:- '.SHALL;RENDER THE>PLANNING.COMMISSION'S DECISIONVOID- SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: On December 6, 1999, the Tigard Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a temple facility and Planned Development for the expansion of the Ashram to allow a residential component that would accommodate two full time residents and eight guests. The differences between the 2001 plan and the plan that was presented to the Planning Commission in 1999 are the location and design of the Temple Facility. The new location fits with the dimensional standards of the CDC. The Planning Commission also approved an adjustment to the front yard setback and denied a variance to address a perceived hardship asserted by access requirements. The site has a shared parking agreement with the office complex to the north (Hall Corporate Center). When the Hall Corporate Center was constructed (SDR97-00014NAR97-0008), a variance was approved for access width to allow 117 parking spaces from one, 30-foot-wide access drive (97 from the shared parking for Hall Corporate Center and Ashram site and 20 from the daycare site). Since then, the access has been improved to the minimum 40-foot requirement. The reason that this application is before the Planning Commission is that the new plan does not conform to the detailed plan approved by the Commission in 1999. As a result, approval of the preliminary and detailed plan by the Commission is necessary.• Vicinity Information: The properties directly to the north and east of the site are zoned C-P and currently occupied by an office complex and a daycare center. The property to the south is zoned R-12 and developed with an apartment complex. The property to the west is zoned R-4.5 and developed with single-family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed with a residential house. The proposal is to continue to use the existing residence as an Ashram (residential dormitory for Monks) and expand it for a total of 4,840 square feet to allow for 2 full-time resident's bedrooms and 8 guestrooms. The proposal also involves the construction of a 9,000 square foot temple. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 3 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES. PERMITS AND USE: Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to build a Temple (Religious Institution) and Ashram (Residential Dormitory Use). The Religious Institution is a Conditional Use in the C-P zone and the residential use is not allowed unless it is part of a Planned Development. This particular proposal is being presented to the Planning Commission to address the change in location and the change in building design. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. The proposed use (Religious Institution) required a Conditional Use permit which is a Type III-HO decision. The 'Conditional Use for the religious institution that was approved in 1999 is still valid except for the proposed modification. The requested living facility (residential use) requires a planned development which is a Type III-PC decision. The minor modification to the Conditional Use is a Type I-ministerial decision, however, in this case they will both be heard by the Planning Commission. When applications are heard concurrently, the highest review authority hears all applications, therefore, all aspects 'of this application will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Decision Making Procedures: Chapter 18.390 Describes the decision-making procedures. Type III-PC procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that predominantly contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III-PC actions are decided by the Planning Commission with appeals to or review by the City Council. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD.COMMENTS There were six attendees at the neighborhood meeting. Their comments were all related to the height of the domes, the parking, and the landscaping buffers. The City has not received any comments related to this project. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. Specific Conditional Use Criteria Major modification of approved or existing conditional use Minor modification of approved or existing conditional use B. lanned Development Standards Process Specific Planned Development Criteria C. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards) D. Additional Planned Development Criteria BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 4 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Impact Study: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant is being required to dedicate right-of-way to allow an ultimate right-of-way width of 45 feet (approximately 20 feet of right-of-way). The Engineering Department has estimated the right-of-way acquisition to be approximately $3 per square foot. It is estimated, therefore, that the value of land being dedicated is $1,920. Upon completion of this development, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $12,927. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $40,397 ($12,927 divided by .32). The difference between the TIFF paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $12,927, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $27,470. Given the estimated cost of the half-street improvement and the unmitigated impact, the dedication requirement meets the rough proportionality test related to the impact of the development. A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type Ill-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements in Chapter 18.330. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.350, Planned Development; 18.390 Decision Making Procedures;18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts, 18.530, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.780, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 5 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • Major modification of approved or existing conditional use criteria: Section 18.330.020. A change in land use; The original conditional use permit was for a religious institution, and the proposal remains the same with a change in location and design. This criterion does not apply. An 10% increase in dwelling unit density; There is no proposed increase in dwelling unit density, therefore this criterion does not apply. A change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; There are no proposed changes to the type or location of the access way or parking areas. The access is proposed to remain in the same location. The access was improved to forty feet in width in the approval of a separate application dealing with the adjacent property. This criterion does not apply to the current proposal. An increase in the floor area proposed for non-residential use by more than 10% where previously specified; The new application proposes an increase of 270 square feet for non-residential purposes. This increase represents less than 3% of the proposed 9000 square foot temple, therefore, this criterion does not apply. A reduction of more than 10% of the area reserved for common open space and/or usable space; There is a proposed reduction of 2,580 square of landscaping and common open space. This reduction represents only 5% of the previously allotted amount, and therefore, this criterion does not apply. A reduction of specified setback requirements by more than 20%; The site plan indicates that all construction will meet the required setbacks of the underlying zone. This criterion does not apply. An elimination of project amenities by more than 10% where previously specified provided such as: 1. Recreational Facilities; There were no proposed recreational facilities associated with the previous project, therefore, this criterion does not apply. 2. Screening; There is an increase in the amount of screening that was proposed in the original approval on the south and west property lines, and no reduction anywhere else on the site. This criterion does not apply. 3. Landscaping provisions; The applicant is proposing to increase the amount of landscaping and has provided staff with a copy of an acceptable landscaping plan. This criterion does not apply. A 10% increase in the approved density; There is no proposed change in the density of this project, therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minor Modification of an existing Conditional Use Permit: Section18.330.020(C): Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in subsection B above shall be considered minor modification. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 6 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • As illustrated in the above discussion this proposal has not made any changes that would warrant consideration as a major modification. An applicant may request approval of a minor modification by means of a Type 1 Cprocedure, as regulated by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria in Subsection 3 below. Although the proposal can be reviewed by means of a Type I _procedure, the design component of the Planned Development is reviewed by means of a Type Ill procedure, and is appropriately reviewed concurrently under this premise. A minor modification shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied following the Director's review based on the findings that: a. The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this title; and As conditioned by this review, the development will be in compliance with this title. b. The modification is not a major modification as defined in Subsection A above. As illustrated in the above discussion the proposal does not constitute a major modification. General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030: The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The existing site size is 2.25 acres. This report evaluates the proposal and necessary setbacks, landscaping, etc. and as conditioned, the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed expansion.) The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; The site is relatively flat. There are trees on the site, but the development has been situated in such a way as to preserve the existing trees. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and All public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary.sewers, and water have adequate capacity to serve the site as discussed in detail elsewhere in this report. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional standards in the C-P zone, the additional dimensional requirements and approval standards for Religious Institutions specified The Conditional Use Standards Section 18.330.050.B.16 and the dimensions proposed for this development. Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft 98,010 sq.ft • Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. SAME AS C-P 190'approx.[3] Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft. 25 ft 20 ft.**" - Side facing street on corner&through lots — 20 ft N/A - Side yard 0/20 ft[1]. 20 ft 20 ft - Rear yard 0/20 ft[1]. 20 ft 20 ft - Side of rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district — — — Distance between property line and garage entrance — — — Maximum Height 45 ft. SAME AS C-P 23 ft.approx.[3] Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% SAME AS C-P 47% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% SAME AS C-P 53% BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 7 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • [1] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] Approximate figures are provided where the applicant's information is not clear or accuracy is questioned. *** Front yard setback granted by the Planning Commission in 1999. (File No. MIS1999-00026) As identified in the table above, the applicant's plans show that the dimensional standards for the base zone are met. , The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapter of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. Other applicable standards of the development code are discussed later in this report. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. Additional Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use. Section 18.330.030.B states that the Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the. approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; Because of the shared parking arrangement, the hours of operation were limited in the previous decision. This criterion has already been addressed. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; The facility as designed does not appear to create any impacts related to air pollution, glare, odor, and or dust. The nature of the use could create noise related to traffic coming and going, but the impacts would be no more recognizable than those associated with adjacent businesses. In any event, the applicant has proposed buffering and screening between the adjacent residential uses to minimize any such impact. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; The existing buffer requirements, as proposed and discussed further in this report, should be adequate to achieve this standard. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Based on the plans submitted, the tallest portion of the temple structure will be 48 feet in height, however, that height is based on those features of the building that are exempt from the height requirements. The actual height of the building will be close to 23 feet in height. The lot coverage is addressed previously in this report. The proposed design fits within the parameters of the standards, and therefore this criterion has been met. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; This criterion is discussed further in this report. Vehicle access is already limited and has been addressed in the previous approval. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 8 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • The applicant has approximately 32 feet of frontage on SW Hall Boulevard. The right-of-way is not to the required width of 45 feet from centerline, therefore, the applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way. This was discussed in the previous approval. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; The majority of parking is existing. The applicant has proposed to construct 8 additional parking spaces, and the screening that has been proposed accomplishes this standard. The proposal is required to address drainage by prior approval. This criterion was addressed by prior approval. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; Signs have not been indicated as proposed, however, compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone should be sufficient in the event that signs are desired. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; The applicant has not provided a lighting plan. Because of this, a condition is warranted requiring the applicant to submit a fighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant will be required to submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; Buffering and screening is discussed further in this report. Because the use proposed is no more intensive than other uses permitted in this zone, additional screening above and beyond what is already required, is not necessary. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; There are exiting fences on the south and west property lines. In addition, the applicant has proposed additional screening. No additional fencing should be required. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; No trees will be removed as a result of this proposal and there are no watercourses, habitat areas or drainage areas on the site. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the following conditions are warranted. CONDITIONS: • Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays with the exception of legal holidays. • The applicant shall comply with the conditions of the existing Conditional Use Permit. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 9 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • B. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL CRITERIA Planned Development (18.350): Chapter 18.350 allows the option for an applicant to create a more efficient, economically viable development that preserves natural land features while implementing the land use designation set forth for the property though the Comprehensive Plan. Section 18.350.020.B states that the Planned Development Review is a three (3)-step process, as follows: 1. The approval of the planned development overlay zone; 2. The approval of the planned development concept plan; and 3. The approval of the Detailed Development Plan. The applicant has requested that this application address Conceptual Planned Development and Detailed Planned Development approval. The approval of the Planned Development Overlay Zone was addressed by the previous decision. Allowed Uses: Section 18.350.060.B states that in all commercial zones, an applicant with a planned development approval may develop the site to contain all of the uses permitted outright in the underlying zone and, in addition, a maximum of 25% of the total gross floor area may be used for multi-family dwellings in those commercial zones that do not list multi-family dwellings as an outright use. The total square footage for all structures will be 14,530 square feet, therefore, only 3,632 square feet is permitted to be used for living areas. The applicant has proposed a total living area (guestrooms) of 3,456 square feet. This criteria has been met. Specific Planned Development Approval Criteria. The Commission shall make findings that the following criteria are satisfied when approving or approving with conditions, the concept plan. The Commission shall make findings that the criteria are not satisfied when denying an application. All the provisions of the land division provisions, Chapters 18.410, 18.420 and 18.430, shall be met; This proposal does not involve a division of land, therefore, this standard does not apply. Except as noted, the provisions of the following chapters shall be utilized as guidelines. A planned development need not meet these requirements where a development plan provides alternative designs and methods, if acceptable to the Commission, that promote the purpose of this section. In each case, the applicant must provide findings to justify the modification of the standards in the chapters listed in Subsection 3 below. The developer may choose to provide or the commission may require additional open space dedication and/or provision of additional amenities, landscaping or tree planting. Chapter 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standards; Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; Chapter 18.765, Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements; Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; and Chapter 18.780, Signs. Compliance with this standard is discussed, and conditioned as necessary in the following section: APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS. C. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Access, Egress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 10 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • • connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; There is an existing walkway along the access drive and there is a walkway proposed from the parking lots to the proposed structures. This criterion has been met. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and The applicant has proposed marked walkways across the parking lot to connect the existing and proposed walkways. This standard, as proposed, has been satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans indicate that the proposed walkway will be concrete. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with more than 100 parking spaces is one 50-foot-wide access with a 40-foot pavement width or two 30-foot-wide access points with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. As discussed earlier, the access was improved to 40-feet in review of another proposal for the adjacent property. This criterion has been satisfied. Director's Authority to Restrict Access: Section 18.705.030.K states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial and industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections. The site already has shared parking and access, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: The application as proposed has met the necessary criterion of this section. Landscaping and Screening —Chapter 18.745: Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The property has no street frontage other than the access drive, therefore, this standard can not be applied. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 11 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • Land Use Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 requires that at a minimum the buffer between a proposed Commercial use and residential use must contain a 10-20 foot buffer with trees, lawn/groundcover, shrubs, and screening. The property to the west is zoned and developed with existing single-family residential homes. The applicant has proposed landscaping that would achieve the most stringent screening option. For example, the applicant has proposed to plant a mixture of trees and shrubs that would essentially screen the view of the facility from those properties to the South and West, as well as maintain and preserve the trees that border the Hall Corporate Centers parking lot. This criterion has been met. Screening - Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped Pparking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking ot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in i landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or . curb. The majority of the parking is existing. The applicant has proposed 8 additional parking spaces with landscaping and screening. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been fully met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The amount of spaces required is based on the number of spaces on this site alone (30 spaces). Two ADA spaces are proposed. This criterion is satisfied. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive to the site is existing and has been improved to forty feet. This criterion has been met. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 12 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • The parking lot is existing and parking spaces are clearly marked, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The existing parking area has curbs along the perimeter. This standard is satisfied. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The parking spaces are existing and the proposed spaces comply with this standard. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed bicycle rack is 49 feet from the entrance of the Ashram and is not located in parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has provided detail of the bicycle parking rack. This criterion is satisfied. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for Religious Institutions, one (1) bicycle parking space is required for every 20 seats in the main assembly area. The applicant has indicated that there will be up to 178 chairs in the main assembly, therefore, nine (9) bicycle parking spaces are required and have been proposed. This criterion has been met. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 13 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Religious Institution is one (1) space for every two (2) seats. Because up to 178 seats will be provided in the main assembly area, 89 parking spaces are required. There are 30 parking spaces proposed on this site and 74 on the adjacent site with which the applicant has a shared parking agreement. Because the total number of spaces available is 104 and the uses are compatible in that the peak hours do not overlap, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790 Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant's plans do not show any trees will be removed, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the applicant has not proposed to remove and trees, this standard has been met. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center fine grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas have been met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards - Chapter 18.810: Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC) standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 14 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.130(E) requires an arterial street to have a 60 to 90 right-of-way width and 12-foot lanes. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map, and is under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW according to the most recent tax assessor's map. This roadway will eventually be widened to have 5 lanes with bike lanes. This type of roadway will require the full 90-foot ROW. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate additional ROW along this frontage to provide 45 feet from the centerline. This has been addressed in the previous approval. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing sidewalk along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard adjacent to this site. No further sidewalk improvements are necessary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-Sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Sanitary sewer service for this site has been provided as a part of the Hall Park Office development. A 3-inch pressure line was installed within the shared driveway aisle and ties into the existing public sewer line in SW Hall Boulevard. The pressure sewer line is necessary due to the fact that this site is at a lower elevation that what the public line in Hall Boulevard can serve. The new building on this site must be constructed to have a sewer pump system. No further public sewer improvements are necessary. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). The Hall Park Office development lies uphill of this site. The majority of the storm water from that development was directed to the north toward the Highway 217 ROW. The drainage plan for this site should be able to accommodate any sheet flow that reaches this site from the wooded area north of the proposed building. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by _ the Unified Sewerage agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 15 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • In 1997, the Clean Water Services completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that lan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates that there will be a vegetated swale constructed adjacent to the southern boundary of the site. It is not clear whether the applicant intends for this facility to serve as a detention facility combined with surface water treatment. The applicant may need to adjust their storm drainage plan to accommodate the detention requirement. The plan also indicates that the storm water from this site will be directed to an existing storm drainage line that is located on the adjacent parcels to the east of this site. This existing private storm drainage line is located within an easement granted in favor of this site, as well as the Hall Park Office and Kindercare sites. This fact was discovered as a part of the approval for the Hall Park Office development. No public storm drainage work is necessary to support this development. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted ' transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 32 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $880. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS REGARDING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District's (TVWD) service area. As a part of the Hall Park Office development, domestic and fire water lines were installed to serve both that project and this project. No additional public water line work will be necessary to support this development. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 16 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC •, • Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the Clean Water Services Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. As was stated above, the applicant is proposing to treat the onsite storm water runoff in a vegetated swale. It appears that the site plan has allowed enough room for an adequately sized swale. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per Clean Water Services regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30 to account for the new building. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the street utility and improvement standards have not been met outright, however, if the applicant complies with conditions specified at the front of this report, the standards will be met. D. ADDITIONAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Section 18.350.100(B)(3) (a) through (I) provides additional Planned Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The following have been discussed previously in this report and will not be discussed in this Section: 18.350.100.B.3.b, 18.350.100.B.3.f, 18.350.100.B.3.g, 18.350.100.B.3.1, I 8.350.100.B.3.j, I 8.350.100.B.3.k Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: The streets, buildings and other site elements shall be designed and located to preserve the existing trees, topography, and natural drainage to the greatest degree possible; Structures located on the site shall not be in areas subject to ground slumping and sliding' There shall be adequate distance between on-site buildings and other on-site and sliding; buildin s on adjoining properties to provide for adequate light and air circulation and for fire protection; The structures shall be oriented with consideration for the sun and wind directions, where possible; and Trees preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 17 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • The buildings have been located on the site to preserve existing trees. There is not significant topography or drainage that will be affected as a result of this proposal. There are no known areas of ground slumping or sliding on site. The proposed setbacks will insure that there is adequate light and air circulation. Fire protection has been considered and the location of these buildings will not hamper fire protection. There are no trees proposed to be removed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the relationship to the natural and physical environment standards have been met. Privacy and Noise: Non-residential structures which abut existing residential dwellings shall be located on the site or be designed in a manner, to the maximum degree possible, to protect the private areas on the adjoining properties from view and noise; FINDING: The temple will be the closest structure to the single-family dwellings west of the site. In addition to the increase in proposed landscaping along the property lines, the temple is located 20 feet away from the property line, the activities will occur on the interior of the structure, and the fact that it is oriented towards Hall Boulevard, will help ensure that this standard is met. The Ashram is considered a residential structure, therefore, this standard does not apply to that structure. Private Outdoor Area - Multi-Family Use: In addition to the requirements of subparagraph (3), each ground-level residential dwelling unit shall have an outdoor private area (patio, terrace, porch) of not less than 48 square feet; Wherever possible, private out oor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun; and Private outdoor spaces shall be screened or designed to provide privacy for the use of the space. While the use is not truly multi-family, all but 2 of the rooms have a deck, the other 2 have access to a deck via a shared room. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas - Multi-Family Use: In addition each multiple-dwelling development shall incorporate shared usable outdoor recreation areas within the development plan as follows: Studio units up to and including two bedroom units, 200 square feet per unit; and Three or more bedroom units, 300 square feet per unit. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable from adjacent units for reasons of crime prevention and safety; The required recreation space may be provided as follows: It may be all outdoor space; or It may be art outdoor space and part indoor space; for example, an outdoor tennis court and indoor recreation room; or it may be all public or common space; or It may,be part common space and part private; for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room, and balconies on each unit; or Where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. While this is not truly multi-family because each room is not a self-contained unit, there are shared worship areas, yoga classrooms and open space. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. Public Transit: Provisions for public transit may be required where the site abuts a public transit route. The required facilities shall be based on: (a) The location of other transit facilities in the area; and (b) The size and type of the proposed development. The required facilities shall be limited to such facilities as: (a) A waiting shelter; (b)A turn- out area for loading and unloading; and (c) Hard surface paths connecting the development to the waiting area. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 18 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • The access drive fronts SW Hall Boulevard, which is on a transit route, however, because the entire frontage is taken up by the access drive, this standard can not be applied. FINDING: Because the entire frontage on the transit route is taken up by the access drive, there is no place to provide transit facilities and, therefore, this standard can not be applied. Floodplain Dedication: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. The proposal is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the site is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, this standard does not apply. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City Building Division has reviewed the proposed and offered the following comments: Provide 3 on-site hydrants, The temple will be reviewed as an A2.1 Occupancy. The Ashram will most likely be reviewed as an R-1 Congregate residence. Accessibility for the living area will most likely be reviewed in accordance with OSSC, Section 1106.1.10.6. The designer should take a cautious look at the rendering and the actual site plan. It appears they will experience code non-compliance for ramps. The application calls foe a two-story building. The rendering looks as though it includes a basement. Unless this is a true basement, (more than 50% below grade) it becomes a 3- story building. Unless the building is going to be designed as a 2FR structure, two (2) stories are the maximum it can be. At Site and building permit application, a full geo-technical report covering soil bearing and liquefaction potential will be required. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • The minimum required fire flow is 1500 gpm @ 20 psi . Prior to the issuance of building permits, documentation shall be provided that indicates the minimum fire flow is available at the required hydrants. (UFC Appendix III-A) • A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this development. The hydrants shall be located so that all portions of both buildings are within 250 feet of a hydrant. (UFC 903.4) • The Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located within 70 feet of a fire hydrant. • Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) • Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (UFC Sec. 8704) BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 19 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • • A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. (UFC Chapter 9) • A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web.site. To access this information via Internet, go to www.tvfr.com, choose "Fire Prevention", then choose "New Construction". (UFC Appendix III-F) The City Police Department has had the opportunity to review the proposal and has requested that a lighting plan be submitted for review and approval. The City of Tigard Property Management/Operations Department has had the opportunity to review the proposal and has offered no comments or objections. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated into the body of this report. SECTION X. CONCLUSION It is further ordered that the applicant and the parties to these proceedings be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED: This 20th day of August. 2001 by the City of Tigard Planning Commission. Nick Wilson, Planning Commission Chair BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 20 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC _ SPRJC� ST mum= 11� �� ��NIE■■ ■■ CITY of TIGARD 1 TS GEOGRAPHIC ST OEOORARNIC INFORMATION SYSTEM • l' millibilli. I V� VICINITY MAP THORN ST S„� T aD ice : N �■1 ■■11� PDR2001 -00003 : 1116116,z,y OR m: I M M D200 I -000 10 I ..1 Illablr ■■■■ ■■I■ ■'■�■■■1� ■1� �: DAKOTA _■ ��I ==o:=^ BRAHMA �■ C� �� �I I fziprimrw-, PREMANANDA _ ■ mill J I ASHRAM & TEMPLE.: : � q y • 2211.70' ,w �. /r)tk 1 \/ •. N 0 -1F pr' ∎r2,/ �9i METZGER RES '111` .. .9 non —A'I/ \\ i 4 M //�� III '111 aO el MI :Z.' 11i ■ NI — 0 III Igtl COME ,0. IlL. ECi .o I rte. IMMO �� NM P V II NM Oa Ws CO IIII Q Q t CR. oar I 9N V.la/N.fl 'II iii ...rem, • -O.11.0 C mniuiiiqiwiti nm •1 ay.nO.a • 00 fo•apalmoo )11 ii II • U'. ` N*.00'00't 207.79' 0 7 otc 1■■' TO Im •%///////////a:.=Yr o ,,� PROPOSED '*.i`S:' , ill RAY pSCOtlsf — & O oi+i. W DOPER LE _ ft 217.0 0 IIIIII'i i p : ' - - - - - - , ° bl LOWER LE FF 217.0 4 3 ti t�,: ^6Ci a aat 7E CO iiitl •'•0 , L L - -- - • 2e9.es'� "--z a q ��� �' u�� N89'11'11'E ` Q P rJl■■■■97 OOSMO DOW= x h ` ■�::�11 A ■ I Nto MOM-CARE e° = co ■ II pincrAr EASEMOIT o o ■ 1> n n ' coli- ill.I�r OTt 7., • �- 1 W g 8 1 ESIS1INC iff a smuctuac S FF 2191 1 —y4 It 1 a. Y.1 uYm L. PROPOSED ASHRAU H0• � FT 2193 (WEN EXIST) 1. -. ^p W f)12......... O 3 a v o 0 See•S3.12'E '73—. 01T'O�t10-A9C CITY of TIGARD t PDR2001.00003/MMD2001-00010 SITE PLAN N BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM & TEMPLE (Map is not to scale) ` • • :�,t:y,:-�a`�-;r.3::-vvra;-.fa+'^c',�r; - ;-'?.F,":'>�r v?<'s*=`':i:�K;,�.:+':,.:s ,<z�»z. .�z�;-:',ac«�:'%�'=roc:.. . <s'a;.:.� _ <r+ a,?a�� Eas"rp�" - - - ��'=��s�.> -�.,�_. _ r4 _ =�s.s t.;r r`a rte. C vi, S..r.+ 4' ''d.', i'f.,. n"F'� =.-*s..:. _s°a°s.- '.v.1..�."a. - - 1 i b• City of Tigard Community TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION s �uy AUGUST 20, 2001 —7:30 P.M. TIGARD CIVIC CENTER - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVE MINUTES 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS 5. PUBLIC HEARING 5.1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 2001-00003/MINOR MODIFICATION (MMD) 2001- 00010 BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM &TEMPLE REQUEST: A request for approval to modify the previous approval for development of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential dormitory for Monks) and a 9,000 square foot Temple. Although the Ashram building proposal has not changed from the previous approval, the design and location of the Temple building have changed, thus requiring a new Planned Development Review and a Minor Modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit. LOCATION: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. The project is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard, north of SW Pacific Highway. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. 6. OTHER BUSINESS Capital Improvement Update — Gus Duenas, City Engineer 7. ADJOURNMENT V Agenda Item: • Hearing Date: August 20,2001 Time: 7:30 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE _ A PLANNING -COMMISSION: ;CITY OF TIGARD Community�Devekpinent FOR THE CITY OF°TIGARD, OREGON , slucpz?� gAtBetterCommumty 120 DAYS = 11/14/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM &TEMPLE ADDITION (A.K.A. SWAMI VISWA PREMENANDA ASHRAM & TEMPLE) CASE NOS.: Planned Development (PDR) PDR2001-00003 Minor Modification (MMD) MMD2001-00010 APPLICANT/ Brahma Premananda Ashram PLANNING Alpha Engineering OWNERS: Attn: Sam Additiwar CONSULTANT: Shelley Holly, Planner 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Plaza West, Suite 230 Tigard, OR 97223 9600 SW Oak Street Portland, OR 97223 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Planned Development design approval and a Minor Modification to Conditional Use permit (CUP1999-00001) for a 9,000 square foot temple and an expansion of the existing Ashram to allow residential use of two (2) bedrooms for the residents and eight (8) guestrooms and a to construct a temple. The original design was considered as part of PDR1999-00002. LOCATION: The subject site is located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that 'the proposed Planned Development and the Minor Modification to'the Conditional:Use will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and, meets the:Approval Standards. for "Planned Development and Minor Modification. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject-to J the;following recommended Conditions of Approval: BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 1 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING:CONDITIONS-SHALL-BE2SATISFIED PRIOR TO:ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: "(Unless:otherwise noted, the Staff.,. contact shall be BRIAN RAGER, Engineering Department-503-639.4171.) Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext. 388) for review and approval: 1. Submit a floor plan that shows the total area dedicated for living facilities (guestrooms and resident's rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet. 2. The applicant shall continue to comply with the attached conditions of approval of CUP 1999-00002. 3. Submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant shall submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. 4. Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 5. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30. 6. Additional right-of-way (ROW) shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, right-of-way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 7. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will provide an on-site water detention facility designed to meet Clean Water Services Design Standards. 8. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96- 44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 9. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $880 and it shall be paid prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE;SATISFIED;. PRIOR TO A=FINAL BUILDING'INSPECTION Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 10. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 2 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION shall provide the Clt of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor)ith written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext. 388) for review and approval: 11. Construct all improvements as shown on the approved plans. Any modifications to plans must be approved by the Planning Division PRIOR to the modification. FAILURE TO_SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:WITHIN 18 MONTHS. OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF.THE.PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION-VOID. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: On December 6, 1999, the Tigard Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a temple facility and Planned Development for the expansion of the Ashram to allow a residential component that would accommodate two full time residents and eight guests. The differences between the 2001 plan and the plan that was presented to the Planning Commission in 1999 are the location and design of the Temple Facility. The new • location fits with the dimensional standards of the CDC. The Planning Commission also approved an adjustment to the front yard setback and denied a variance to address a perceived hardship asserted by access requirements. The site has a shared parking agreement with the office complex to the north (Hall Corporate Center). When the Hall Corporate Center was constructed (SDR97-00014NAR97-0008), a variance was approved for access width to allow 117 parking spaces from one, 30-foot-wide access drive (97 from the shared parking for Hall Corporate Center and Ashram site and 20 from the daycare site). Since then, the access has been improved to the minimum 40-foot requirement. The reason that this application is before the Planning Commission is that the new plan does not conform to the detailed plan approved by the Commission in 1999. As a result, approval of the preliminary and detailed plan by the Commission is necessary. Vicinity Information: The properties directly to the north and east of the site are zoned C-P and currently occupied by an office complex and a daycare center. The property to the south is zoned R-12 and developed with an apartment complex. The property to the west is zoned R-4.5 and developed with single-family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed with a residential house. The proposal is to continue to use the existing residence as an Ashram (residential dormitory for Monks) and expand it for a total of 4,840 square feet to allow for 2 full-time resident's bedrooms and 8 guestrooms. The proposal also involves the construction of a 9,000 square foot temple. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE: Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to build a Temple (Religious Institution) and Ashram (Residential Dormitory Use). The Religious Institution is a Conditional Use in the C-P zone and the residential use is not allowed unless it is part of a Planned Development. This particular proposal is being presented to the Planning Commission to address the change in location and the change in building design. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 3 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Summary Land Use Permifs: Chapter 18.310 • Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. The proposed use (Religious Institution) required a Conditional Use permit which is a Type III-HO decision. The Conditional Use for the religious institution that was approved in 1999 is still valid except for the proposed modification. The requested living facility (residential use) requires a planned development which is a Type III-PC decision. The minor modification to the Conditional Use is a Type I-ministerial decision, however, in this case they will both be heard by the Planning Commission. When applications are heard concurrently, the highest review authority hears all applications, therefore, all aspects of this application will be reviewed by the f Planning Commission. Decision Making Procedures: Chapter 18.390 Describes the decision-making procedures. Type III-PC procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that predominantly contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III-PC actions are decided by the Planning Commission with appeals to or review by the City Council. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS There were six attendees at the neighborhood meeting. Their comments were all related to the height of the domes, the parking, and the landscaping buffers. The City has not received any comments related to this project. . SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. Specific Conditional Use Criteria • Major modification of approved or existing conditional use Minor modification of approved or existing conditional use B. lanned Development Standards Process Specific Planned Development Criteria C. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 isual Clearance) 18. 810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards) D. Additional Planned Development Criteria SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Impact Study: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 4 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION . Any required street impro ements to certain collector or higli"er volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant is being required to dedicate right-of-way to allow an ultimate right-of-way width of 45 feet (approximately 20 feet of right-of-way). The Engineering Department has estimated the right-of-way acquisition to be approximately $3 per square foot. It is estimated, therefore, that the value of land being dedicated is $1,920. Upon completion of this development, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $12,927. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $40,397 ($12,927 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $12,927, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $27,470. Given the estimated cost of the half-street improvement and the unmitigated impact, the dedication requirement meets the rough proportionality test related to the impact of the development. A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements in Chapter 18.330. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.350, Planned Development; 18.390 Decision Making Procedures;18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts, 18.530, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.780, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Major modification of approved or existing conditional use criteria: Section 18.330.020. A change in land use; The original conditional use permit was for a religious institution, and the proposal remains the same with a change in location and design. This criterion does not apply. An 10% increase in dwelling unit density; There is no proposed increase in dwelling unit density, therefore this criterion does not apply. A change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 5 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • There are no proposed changes to the type or location of the access way or parking areas. The access is proposed to remain in the same location. The access was improved to forty feet in width in the approval of a separate application dealing with the adjacent property. This criterion does not apply to the current proposal. An increase in the floor area proposed for non-residential use by more than 10% where previously specified; The new application proposes an increase of 270 square feet for non-residential purposes. This increase represents less than 3% of the proposed 9000 square foot temple, therefore, this criterion does not apply. A reduction of more than 10% of the area reserved for common open. space and/or usable space; There is a proposed reduction of 2,580 square of landscaping and common open space. This reduction represents only 5% of the previously allotted amount, and therefore, this criterion does not apply. A reduction of specified setback requirements by more than 20%; The site plan indicates that all construction will meet the required setbacks of the underlying zone. This criterion does not apply. An elimination of project amenities by more than 10% where previously specified provided such as: 1. Recreational Facilities; There were no proposed recreational facilities associated with the previous project, therefore, this criterion does not apply. 2. Screening; There is an increase in the amount of screening that was proposed in the original approval on the south and west property lines, and no reduction anywhere else on the site. This criterion does not apply. 3. Landscaping provisions; The applicant is proposing to increase the amount of landscaping and has provided staff with a copy of an acceptable landscaping plan. This criterion does not apply. A 10% increase in the approved density; There is no proposed change in the density of this project, therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minor Modification of an existing Conditional Use Permit: Section18.330.020(C): Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in subsection B above shall be considered a minor modification. As illustrated in the above discussion, this proposal has not made any changes that would warrant consideration as a major modification. An applicant may request approval of a minor modification by means of a Type I procedure, as regulated by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria in Subsection C3 below. Although the proposal can be reviewed by means of a Type I procedure, the design component of the Planned Development is reviewed by means of a Type Ill procedure, and is appropriately reviewed concurrently under this premise. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 6 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION A minor modification sh1Pbe approved, approved with connions, or denied following the Director's review based on the findings that: a. The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this title; and As conditioned by this review, the development will be in compliance with this title. b. The modification is not a major modification as defined in Subsection A above. As illustrated in the above discussion the proposal does not constitute a major modification. General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030: The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The existing site size is 2.25 acres. This report evaluates the proposal and necessary setbacks, landscaping, etc. and as conditioned, the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed expansion. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; The site is relatively flat. There are trees on the site, but the development has been situated in such a way as to preserve the existing trees. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and All public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary sewers, and water have adequate capacity to serve the site as discussed in detail elsewhere in this report. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional standards in the C-P zone, the additional dimensional requirements and approval standards for Religious Institutions specified The Conditional Use Standards Section 18.330.050.B.16 and the dimensions proposed for this development. C-P . �aCONDITIONAL U$E''": PROPOSED.i::• • - 'REQUIREMEN T . Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft 98,010 sq.ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. SAME AS C-P 190'approx.[3] Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft. 25 ft 20 ft.' - Side facing street on corner&through lots — 20 ft N/A - Side yard 0/20 ft[1]. 20 ft 20 ft - Rear yard 0/20 ft[1]. 20 ft 20 ft - Side of rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district — — — Distance between property line and garage entrance — — — Maximum Height 45 ft. SAME AS C-P 23 ft.approx.[3] Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% SAME AS C-P 47% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% . SAME AS C-P _ 53% [1] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] Approximate figures are provided where the applicant's information is not clear or accuracy is questioned. Front yard setback granted by the Planning Commission in 1999. (File No. MIS1999-00026) As identified in the table above, the applicant's plans show that the dimensional standards for the base zone are met. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 7 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapter of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. Other applicable standards of the development code are discussed later in this report. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. Additional Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use. Section 18.330.030.B states that the Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; Because of the shared parking arrangement, the hours of operation were limited in the previous decision. This criterion has already been addressed. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; The facility as designed does not appear to create any impacts related to air pollution, glare, odor, and or dust. The nature of the use could create noise related to traffic coming and going, but the impacts would be no more recognizable than those associated with adjacent businesses. In any event, the applicant has proposed buffering and screening between the adjacent residential uses to minimize any such impact. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; The existing buffer requirements, as proposed and discussed further in this report, should be adequate to achieve this standard. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Based on the plans submitted, the tallest portion of the temple structure will be 48 feet in height, however, that height is based on those features of the building that are exempt from the height requirements. The actual height of the building will be close to 23 feet in height. The lot coverage is addressed previously in this report. The proposed design fits within the parameters of the standards, and therefore this criterion has been met. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; This criterion is discussed further in this report. Vehicle access is already limited and has been addressed in the previous approval. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; The applicant has approximately 32 feet of frontage on SW Hall Boulevard. The right-of-way is not to the required width of 45 feet from centerline, therefore, the applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way. This was discussed in the previous approval. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; The majority of parking is existing. The applicant has proposed to construct 8 additional parking spaces, and the screening that has been proposed accomplishes this standard. The proposal is required to address drainage by prior approval. This criterion was addressed by prior approval. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 8 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; Signs have not been indicated as proposed, however, compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone should be sufficient in the event that signs are desired. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; The applicant has not provided a lighting plan. Because of this, a condition is warranted requiring the applicant to submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant will be required to submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; Buffering and screening is discussed further in this report. Because the use proposed is no more intensive than other uses permitted in this zone, additional screening above and beyond what is already required, is not necessary. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; There are exiting fences on the south and west property lines. In addition, the applicant has proposed additional screening. No additional fencing should be required. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; No trees will be removed as a result of this proposal and there are no watercourses, habitat areas or drainage areas on the site. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the following conditions are warranted. CONDITIONS: ♦ Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays with the exception of legal holidays. ♦ The applicant shall comply with the conditions of the existing Conditional Use Permit. B. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL CRITERIA Planned Development (18.350): Chapter 18.350 allows the option for an applicant to create a more efficient, economically viable development that preserves natural land features while implementing the land use designation set forth for the property though the Comprehensive Plan. Section 18.350.020.B states that the Planned Development Review is a three (3)-step BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 9 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • process, as follows: 1. The approval of the planned development overlay zone; 2. The approval of the planned development concept plan; and 3. The approval of the Detailed Development Plan. The applicant has requested that this application address Conceptual Planned Development and Detailed Planned Development approval. The approval of the Planned Development Overlay Zone was addressed by the previous decision. Allowed Uses: Section 18.350.060.B states that in all commercial zones, an applicant with a planned development approval may develop the site to contain all of the uses permitted outright in the underlying zone and, in addition, a maximum of 25% of the total gross floor area may be used for multi-family dwellings in those commercial zones that do not list multi-family dwellings as an outright use. The total square footage for all structures will be 14,530 square feet, therefore, only 3,632 square feet is permitted to be used for living areas. The applicant has proposed a total living area (guestrooms) of 3,456 square feet. This criteria has been met. Specific Planned Development Approval Criteria. The Commission shall make findings that the following criteria are satisfied when approving or approving with conditions, the concept plan. The Commission shall make findings that the criteria are not satisfied when denying an application. All the provisions of the land division provisions, Chapters 18.410, 18.420 and 18.430, shall be met; This proposal does not involve a division of land, therefore, this standard does not apply. Except as noted, the provisions of the following chapters shall be utilized as guidelines. A planned development need not meet these requirements where a development plan provides alternative designs and methods, if acceptable to the Commission, that promote the purpose of this section. In each case, the applicant must provide findings to justify the modification of the standards in the chapters listed in Subsection 3 below. The developer may choose to provide or the commission may require additional open space dedication and/or provision of additional amenities, landscaping or tree planting. Chapter 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standards; Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; Chapter 18.765, Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements; Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; and Chapter 18.780, Signs. Compliance with this standard is discussed, and conditioned as necessary in the following section: APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS. C. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Access, Egress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless Impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; There is an existing walkway along the access drive and there is a walkway proposed from the parking lots to the proposed structures. This criterion has been met. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 10 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and The applicant has proposed marked walkways across the parking lot to connect the existing and proposed walkways. This standard, as proposed, has been satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to.required pathways. The plans indicate that the proposed walkway will be concrete. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with more than 100 parking spaces is one 50-foot-wide access with a 40-foot pavement width or two 30-foot-wide access points with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. As discussed earlier, the access was improved to 40-feet in review of another proposal for the adjacent property. This criterion has been satisfied. Director's Authority to Restrict Access: Section 18.705.030.K states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial and industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections. The site already has shared parking and access, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: The application as proposed has met the necessary criterion of this section. Landscaping and Screening — Chapter 18.745: Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The property has no street frontage other than the access drive, therefore, this standard can not be applied. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 requires that at a minimum the buffer between a proposed Commercial use and residential use must contain a 10-20 foot buffer with trees, lawn/groundcover, shrubs, and screening. The property to the west is zoned and developed with existing single-family residential homes. The applicant has proposed landscaping that would achieve the most stringent screening option. For example, the applicant has proposed to plant a mixture of trees and shrubs that would essentially screen the view of the facility from those properties to the South and West, as well as maintain and preserve the trees that border the Hall Corporate BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 11 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • Centers parking lot. This criterion has been met. Screening - Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in i landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The majority of the parking is existing. The applicant has proposed 8 additional parking spaces with landscaping and screening. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been fully met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The amount of spaces required is based on the number of spaces on this site alone (30 spaces). Two ADA spaces are proposed. This criterion is satisfied. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive to the site is existing and has been improved to forty feet. This criterion has been met. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The parking lot is existing and parking spaces are clearly marked, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 12 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION The existing parking area h..curbs along the perimeter. This st dard is satisfied. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The parking spaces are existing and the proposed spaces comply with this standard. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed bicycle rack is 49 feet from the entrance of the Ashram and is not located in parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at.least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has provided detail of the bicycle parking rack. This criterion is satisfied. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for Religious Institutions, one (1) bicycle parking space is required for every 20 seats in the main assembly area. The applicant has indicated that there will be up to 178 chairs in the main assembly, therefore, nine (9) bicycle parking spaces are required and have been proposed. This criterion has been met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 13 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Religious Institution is one (1) space for every two (2) seats. Because up to 178 seats will be provided in the main assembly area, 89 parking spaces are required. There are 30 parking spaces proposed on this site and 74 on the adjacent site with which the applicant has a shared parking agreement. Because the total number of spaces available is 104 and the uses are compatible in that the peak hours do not overlap, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790 Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant's plans do not show any trees will be removed, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the applicant has not proposed to remove and trees, this standard has been met. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas have been met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards - Chapter 18.810: Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC) standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion rtion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 60 to 90 right-of-way width and 12-foot lanes. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 14 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION This site lies adjacent to Hall Boulevard, which is classified—as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map, and is under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW according to the most recent tax assessor's map. This roadway will eventually be widened to have 5 lanes with bike lanes. This type of roadway will require the full 90-foot ROW. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate additional ROW along this frontage to provide 45 feet from the centerline. This has been addressed in the previous approval. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing sidewalk along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard adjacent to this site. No further sidewalk improvements are necessary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-Sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Sanitary sewer service for this site has been provided as a part of the Hall Park Office development. A 3-inch pressure line was installed within the shared driveway aisle and ties into the existing ublic sewer line in SW Hall Boulevard. The pressure sewer line is necessary due to the fact that this site is at a lower elevation that what the public line in Hall Boulevard can serve. The new building on this site must be constructed to have a sewer pump system. No further public sewer improvements are necessary. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). The Hall Park Office development lies uphill of this site. The majority of the storm water from that development was directed to the north toward the Highway 217 ROW. The drainage plan for this site should be able to accommodate any sheet flow that reaches this site from the wooded area north of the proposed building. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 15 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • . In 1997, the Clean Water Services completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates that there will be a vegetated swale constructed adjacent to the southern boundary of the site. It is not clear whether the applicant intends for this facility to serve as a detention facility combined with surface water treatment. The applicant may need to adjust their storm drainage plan to accommodate the detention requirement. The plan also indicates that the storm water from this site will be directed to an existing storm drainage line that is located on the adjacent parcels to the east of this site. This existing private storm drainage line is located within an easement granted in favor of this site, as well as the Hall Park Office and Kindercare sites. This fact was discovered as a part of the approval for the Hall Park Office development. No public storm drainage work is necessary to support this development. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in-lieu is liproposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead osnes. The frontage along this site is 32 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $880. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS REGARDING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District's (TVWD) service area. As a part of the Hall Park Office development, domestic and fire water lines were installed to serve both that project and this project. No additional public water line work will be necessary to"support this development. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 16 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the Clean Water Services Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. As was stated above, the applicant is proposing to treat the onsite storm water runoff in a vegetated swale. It appears that the site plan has allowed enough room for an adequately sized swale. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per Clean Water Services regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site • and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30 to account for the new building. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the street utility and improvement standards have not been met outright, however, if the applicant complies with conditions specified at the front of this report, the standards will be met. D. ADDITIONAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Section 18.350.100(B)(3) (a) through (I) provides additional Planned Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The following have been discussed previously in this report and will not be discussed in this Section: 18.350.100.B.3.b, 18.350.100.B.3.f, 18.350.100.B.3.g, 18.350.100.B.3.i, 18.350.100.B.3.j, 18.350.100.B.3.k Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: The streets, buildings and other site elements shall be designed and located to preserve the existing trees, topography and natural drainage to the greatest degree possible; Structures located on the site shall not be in areas subject to ground slumping and sliding' There shall be adequate distance between on-site buildings and other on-site and off-site buildings on adjoining properties to provide for adequate light and air circulation and for ire protection; The structures shall be oriented with consideration for the sun and wind directions, where possible; and Trees preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 17 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • The buildings have been located on the site to preserve existing trees. There is not significant topography or drainage that will be affected as a result of this proposal. There are no known areas of ground slumping or sliding on site. The proposed setbacks will insure that there is adequate light and air circulation. Fire protection has been considered and the location of these buildings will not hamper fire protection. There are no trees proposed to be removed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the relationship to the natural and physical environment standards have been met. Privacy and Noise: Non-residential structures which abut existing residential dwellings shall be located on the site or be designed in a manner, to the maximum degree possible, to protect the private areas on the adjoining properties from view and noise; FINDING: The temple will be the closest structure to the single-family dwellings west of the site. In addition to the increase in proposed landscaping along the property lines, the temple is located 20 feet away from the property line, the activities will occur on the interior of the structure, and the fact that it is oriented towards Hall Boulevard, will help ensure that this standard is met. The Ashram is considered a residential structure, therefore, this standard does not apply to that structure. Private Outdoor Area - Multi-Family Use: In addition to the requirements of subparagraph (3), each ground-level residential dwelling unit shall have an outdoor private area patio, terrace, porch) of not less than 48 square feet; Wherever possible, private out oor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun; and Private outdoor spaces shall be screened or designed to provide privacy for the use of the space. While the use is not truly multi-family, all but 2 of the rooms have a deck, the other 2 have access to a deck via a shared room. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas - Multi-Family Use: In addition each multiple-dwelling development shall incorporate shared usable outdoor recreation areas within the development plan as follows: Studio units up to and including two bedroom units, 200 square feet per unit; and Three or more • bedroom units, 300 square feet per unit. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable from adjacent units for reasons of crime prevention and safety; The required recreation space may be provided as follows: It may be all outdoor space; or It may be art outdoor space and part indoor space; for example, an outdoor tennis court and indoor recreation room; or it may be all public or common space; or It may be part common space and part private; for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room, and balconies on each unit; or Where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. While this is not truly multi-family because each room is not a self-contained unit, there are shared worship areas, yoga classrooms and open space. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. Public Transit: Provisions for public transit may be required where the site abuts a public transit route. The required facilities shall be based on: (a) The location of other transit facilities in the area; and (b) The size and type of the proposed development. The required facilities shall be limited to such facilities as: (a) A waiting shelter; (b)A turn- out area for loading and unloading; and (c) Hard surface paths connecting the development to the waiting area. The access drive fronts SW Hall Boulevard, which is on a transit route, however, because the entire frontage is taken up by the access drive, this standard can not be applied. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 18 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • FINDING: Because the entire frontage on the transit route is taken up by the access drive, there is no place to provide transit facilities and, therefore, this standard can not be applied. Floodplain Dedication: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. The proposal is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the site is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, this standard does not apply. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City Building Division has reviewed the proposed and offered the following comments: Provide 3 on-site hydrants, The temple will be reviewed as an A2.1 Occupancy. The Ashram will most likely be reviewed as an R-1 Congregate residence. Accessibility for the living area will most likely be reviewed in accordance with OSSC, Section 1106.1.10.6. The designer should take a cautious look at the rendering and the actual site plan. It appears they will experience code non-compliance for ramps. The application calls foe a two-story building. The rendering looks as though it includes a basement. Unless this is a true basement, (more than 50% below grade) it becomes a 3- story building. Unless the building is going to be designed as a 2FR structure, two (2) stories are the maximum it can be. At Site and building permit application, a full geo-technical report covering soil bearing and liquefaction potential will be required. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • The minimum required fire flow is 1500 gpm @ 20 psi . Prior to the issuance of building permits, documentation shall be provided that indicates the minimum fire flow is available at the required hydrants. (UFC Appendix III-A) • A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this development. The hydrants shall be located so that all portions of both buildings are within 250 feet of a hydrant. (UFC 903.4) • The Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located within 70 feet of a fire hydrant. • Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) • Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (UFC Sec. 8704) • A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. (UFC Chapter 9) • A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix Ill-F, the building survey form and the instructions BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 19 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, go to www.tvfr.com, choose "Fire Prevention", then choose "New Construction". (UFC Appendix III-F) The City Police Department has had the opportunity to review the proposal and has requested that a lighting plan be submitted for review and approval. The City of Tigard Property Management/Operations Department has had the opportunity to review the proposal and has offered no comments or objections. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated into the body of this report. August 7, 2001 PREPARED BY: Bad Kilby DATE Associate Planner '' August 7, 2001 APPROVED BY: Richard"Bewe v •iff DATE Planning Ma -ger • BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 20 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 'r�r��� •��-�� ��rsm� CITY of II G A R D SPRUCE ST ,SPR�ICE > I ST Oe00e A►NIC IN►OI UATION eYe 7141 - _ a ' I - } ' a-- --- Will I I I I VICINITY MAP TH R g-f---, J 1 �_ Q Um. T Millillik -,...,, �:�� ■ i11 �1E_ I■1. 1 � ► � t , 1111W: jrasto PDR2001 -00003 mai ill= - MMD2001 -00010 ANN Imim, ••�,,,� • ■� ' ilk �� m � ��I INN BRAHMA AL ,- 1 _VIrmilre.. , PREMANANDA ii. on I. pit a a� •- -i• .. ,: a_ �.. —. • . _ - mho No I • ASHRAM & TEMPLE - — - EL �---L 11111 5!J_ _-ii rill II Ilars\*. \s‘',„,„„„.. ilk III ks, "V.41'.'! L?MITA A il g9 rr- IVP1 to !.OW IWPflir 11 NM as 0 rEVAMONI JIM+ A ik V • �.. Ibill ■■ .� • 0 200 400 800 Feet mr� ■■ 4 *-43*-r• i 1"•498 feet, VW ._:1,c,,.;■.N. . 12,L40, •�.�, 444 ,VIr oSIMCity of Tigard ST `�`�♦. ,:,�, m- _ should b dv.On this map le for pepenl Io Services Di end �. '♦. . r _; efwuld be verified with the Development Smiue Dlvislon, 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 ' 639-4171 hitp:/Avw) 39lperd.or,ue s� (503)03)Plot d date:Jul 19,2001;Camaglc\MAGICO3.APR Community Development • O �� .` 22e.7e• •• 'NA. ''-if.k4 j/ ctr'-■/ • N. • ° ,'y',, ; �r.'; ,;,,,..0'� Ad -IN 6 METZGER 17 , -IN ;���` A =a .g \ a . it?I — mum 1 /I= a m DEEID000 . I IS n ` • •W .• .. ... •• • �a 9 "W" -- _ i NI i NI imi A A "m - ...WPM MEMO , ,MI`-r a+r AMl'I - 6 900 O • UM rose_ .7l" I IIII 91/�lu.•��1_ r•IINIIII . -q xra �0q t�;u, � �I e� ofl91mu iii• :, � N •'00'00•E 207.79' ' E Q 9911.: Cl?', �. t"s1.n9°•na _ 0 m_.�:: CO• • UPPER PROPOSED E 2�°.° o Iillll'IIII4 , •e1 . ..a 3 LOWER LE R 21).0 ' rr�lQ'"., '.rm. AmA --L ■.•a at 1;t' ig �o n '•'0 L ---- 2e9.elt. C �, E I �•F. } :•i my Ne9'1tY1 E t1091M,0 d1R.NQ 1a, �_ 71�99•1M1111M■ A �II � ( M10 MO tr44 CML "Z °. •■ 0•IKrAr • m tea -.I. ...1% iril .. �r @;+r;Ci) _ �. II A 14.t.gitit i •� 9s , 1 t[• I u m-�i�PROPOSED ASNRAY Md f 219! (MATCH E7UST) Ne9jA�`1 •E C rai 0 • e d -R4 v 0 5f •S99ST.3122E •iH t� P A CITY of TUGARD � PDR2001.000031MMD2001.00010 °'"°'"°"°° SITE PLAN BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM & TEMPLE (Map Is not to scale) . w • • RECEIVED PLANNING • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE AUG 0 6 2001.. WITHIN_SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE:SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO City of:Tgard .. Planning Division - G P>r OE TIGARp 13125 SWHaIi.Baulevard :;: ;Tigard,OR .:9722 ::::: , I, j1' &I4 lel I 1'y , dp affir that I am (represe ) the party initiating interest in a p?oposed p/gaQd /„ o„). KP.ta Motor Moth A( fecting the land . located at (state the approximate location( if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 1 I 15 51,,E )401P RI* , and did on the 3 day of P �S 'ii personally pot notice indica ing that the site may be proposed for a n2.C.�:-;,A -.. W./(not Mxtibc.thoi1application, and the time,.date and place of a neighborhood' meeting to discuss the proposal. /�?� (� The sign was posted at � d'T W 1 - 6.r (. 1'5 /' SL3 400 i t i .C.iA t �OW' . (state location you posted notice on property) e . Signature (I the presence of otary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Zoo Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 1-4 day of / A. *- , . ` v� OFFICIAL SEAL , , \ TRACTL.VANCE j NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON CQMAIISS:QN NO.332831 PAY COMMISSION EXP iF ES MAA.21,2004 NOTARY -PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: 3-2--I- p L.`- (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: I.Name of Applicant/Owner: I Address or General Location of Subject Property: I Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): h:log inlpattylmasterslaftpost.mst NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHO•R,VENDOR OR SELLER: • THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES TM IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. 410 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION,AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 2001 AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NOS.: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 2001-00003 MINOR MODIFICATION (MMD) 2001-00010 FILE TITLE: BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM & TEMPLE APPLICANT: Alpha Engineering, Inc. OWNERS: Brahma Premananda Ashram Shelley Holly, Project Planner Attn: Sam Add itiwar 9600 SW Oak Street, Suite 230 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A request for approval to modify the previous approval for development of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential dormitory for Monks) and a 9,000 square foot Temple. Although the Ashram building proposal has not changed from the previous approval, the design and location of the Temple building have changed, thus requiring a new Planned Development Review and a Minor Modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit. LOCATION: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. The project is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard, north of SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPO. ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN(7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT(503)639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. ��• � ���� Immo= cRr.T, ARO I -∎ ________/■■•_ !.,hfr�`I�$•,III■I VICINITY MAP 1 �-F1.6 us Num. ism PDR200I-00003 ��C ■1 im=NI aim' � MMD200I-00010 �G,,_ ■n! ■■Ii! II■I1� mo s.= � NO IL a I.. :: BRAHMA � = :C� to�I PREMANANDA .`�"Z� ■: �=.=�'_= , � ,,�� i 01� �i I��ASHRAM & TEMPLE ■M N� ■■irm■ "1, �� N.1, ♦ ■ ■L-: aglip Pl■ p• EL pp-�� ,O Re._GO, iiivw TOI M IL 5 01 .4A ga P7."444 CIty of ligsrd •#V,4 I 11•41 I 51 I I I ii&k. .41gir 1:140101k. 14QOEST FoR COMMENTS • DATE: July 31, 2001 PLANS CHECK NO. PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE Swami Viswa Temple TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE: TAX MAP NO.: SITES NO.ADDRESS: . LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $ 226.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 57.00 OFFICE $207.00 This is and estimated TIF INDUSTRIAL $ 217.00 X INSTITUTIONAL $ 94.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG. WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE 560 Church TRIP RATE 7.70 18.18 BASIS: Applicant proposes construction of a new 13,800 Sq. Ft. church CALCULATIONS: TIF = ( (Weekday Ave trips X 5) + (Weekend average trips) —credits)X T.G.S.F. X Rate per Trip 7 _ $12,927 = ( (7.70X5 ) + (18.18 X 2 ) X 13.8)-10) X $94 7 Transit Amt. $2,346 = 138X $17 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: 138 FEE: $12,927 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: Credit applied for one single family dwelling ROAD AMT. $10,581 TRANSIT AMT. $2,346 • PREPARED BY: S.S. Casper I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 • • MEMORANDUM eisoirl I TO: Brad Kilby .._.... _�, FROM: Matt Stine, City Forester RE: Brahma Premananda Ashram & Temple DATE: August 14, 2001 As you requested I have provided some comments on the `Brahma Premananda & Temple" project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding my comments please contact me anytime. 1. TREE PROTECTION DEVICES 18.745.030 E. PROTECTION OF EXISTING VEGETATION. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around the individual trees). 1.1. All tree protection devices shall be located on the Tree Protection Plan. Any tree that will not be removed onsite that is within the limits of disturbance of this project must be protected. Any tree that is located on property adjacent to the construction project that will have more than 20% of its root system disturbed by construction activities shall also be protected. 1.2. Details and specifications are required as to how the trees will be protected on site. The details and specifications are included in this memo. 1.3. Provide a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, or installation of sediment and • • erosion control measures, and other activities that may be required to implement the tree protection measures. 1.4. Include in the notes on the final set of plans that equipment, vehicles, machinery, dumping or storage, or other construction activities, burial, burning, or other disposal of construction materials must not be located inside of any tree protection device or outside of the limits of disturbance where trees are being protected. No grading, filling or any other construction activity may occur within the tree protection devices at any time or outside of the limits of disturbance where trees are being protected unless approved by the City Forester. 1.5. All tree protection devices shall be: • Visible. • Well-anchored. • Approved in the field prior to clearing, grading, or the beginning of construction. • Remain in place and maintained until all construction is completed and a final inspection is conducted. 1.6. All tree protection devises shall be constructed according to the attached illustrations (Figures D-5 and D-6). 1.7. To determine the size of the tree protection zone follow the guidelines listed below: • For individual trees follow the trunk diameter method. For every one-inch of diameter at breast height (DBH), or 4 1/2 feet above the ground, allow 12 inches of space from the trunk of the tree. For example, a tree that is 15" at DBH must have at least 12' of tree protection zone around the entire canopy of the tree. • For groups of trees the tree protection zone must be outside of the dripline of the trees on the edge of the stand. If there are conifers with narrow crowns on the edge of the stand follow the trunk diameter method or the dripline method, whichever is greater. 1.8. Identify, on the Tree Protection Plan, the location of the stockpile area and the staging area (if different from the stockpile area). 1.9. All of this information must be included in the final plan's notes or drawings. • • • 2. TREE SPECIES SELECTION & PLANTING 18.745.030 C. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. 2. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock (ANSI Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions); and 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. G. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF EXISTING VEGETATION. The review procedures and standards for required landscaping and screening shall be specified in the conditions of approval during development review and in no instance shall be less than that required for conventional development. 2.1. It is recommended that all tree planting follow the guidelines set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture's tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10th edition. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. I recommend that these guidelines be followed and adhered to at all times. 2.2. In order to develop tree species diversity onsite it is recommended that the following guidelines be followed: • No more than 30% of any one family be planted onsite. • No more than 20% of any one genus be planted onsite. • No more than 10% of any one species be planted onsite. 2.3. I recommend that all of this information be included in the final plan's notes or drawings. If you have any questions please call me anytime. Thank you for requesting my comments on this project. • • ANCHOR POSTS SHOULD BE HIGHLY VISIBLE MINIMUM 2"STEEL U CHANNEL FLAGGING ATTACHED TO TOPS OR 2"X2"TIMBER,6'IN LENGTH OF ANCHOR POSTS MAXIMUM 8 FEET USE 2"X4"LUMBER FOR CROSS BRACING wi�iw�w tii■iwi�wi■i/iw tai■lt■■w wi_.wiw •i11111i• iw11itiiw/w wi■•• i • �riw��ii i.r���r�w���ri i�►ter momiiimum wili■it■iwlttii■Iwiw wi■ill11111iw t1•i■iwi� ■■tiwitwlt■i■it■iti�7i■It■it■ �ii w ww wit■iw■r wi■i�iwlwi■iwir t■i■i�iw 4 FEET rsomal t_.>•i■iwifiiwi■iwialwi■iwiw MINIMUM _i■i_i•111 wi■iwi11111111.11i■iwi•11111 wi■i111•1rw • �—---it----ter wiINiw.1•111 wir■■iwiw■■iwitrt wi■i11111iw rri..r aptdon.... w ririiw Arfi∎wr •■l■i •i•111 w■■iRiwiw■■ittii� w■■it■ltt■ 11•111111.11111=1 wi■i■iwiwi■iMw tiirit■iti =ll• 11 ,oky ANCHOR POSTS MUST BE INSTALLED TO A DEPTH OF NO LE55 THAN 1/3 THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF POST U5E 8"WIRE'U' TO SECURE FENCE BOTTOM Notes: 1. Blaze orange or blue plastic mesh fence for forest protection device,only. 2. Boundaries of Retention Area will be established as part of the forest conservation plan review process. 3. Boundaries of Retention Area should be staked and flagged prior to installing device. 4.Avoid damage to critical root zone. Do not damage or sever large roots when Installing posts. 5. Protection signs are required. 6. Device should be maintained throughout construction. Source:Adapted from Prince George's County,Maryland:Woodland Conservation Manual and Forest Conservation Manual,1991 Plastic Mesh Tree Protection Fence Figure D-5 D -6 0 1111 I ANCHOR POSTS SHOULD BE HIGHLY VISIBLE MINIMUM 2"STEEL U CHANNEL FLAGGING ATTACHED TO TOPS OR 2"X2"TIMBER,6'IN LENGTH OF ANCHOR POSTS MAXIMUM 8 FEET USE 2"X4"LUMBER FOR CR055 BRACING 4 wlitaanrfa wlria lIPItraU•Uwr+ta 11111l1•1111i111M WWWWW Yi�Iii�W7WWWWiii shift waniswaw waarswswIIMawsw1s weNIwew wti_I• ._ wlti0wl• IIMMtalwII1M IIIIlIIIti)•Itw It llveIt\la /Illl.lwlw1fl•1UlwliawU•flwlw rr..rises.. ria irrris. r�ri wl1•1l11111■w iwl1111lwlwfiwl■lwl111111 wlt•lIIIIIItiw 4 FEET ��►iirri�irriri�r ar�rir wl�lwlw w1.■14117 lt•IATIll 1 iII�lw MINIMUM r���r ................t.■ .ri�rrr I•r.t,.w._ we.e�UwLwa�sw1w we�uasw �-�irr.■ii∎rr rirri.Irrrr-- _ri_fiw■tw tti11t•1111111MwtiIIIIIIIMII• 11ti _u_._._ errr art riir a.i �r.rsi rr Altt•wi/ wl■l�lwlw■tilwl�_.ti.tNI•_ rr rrir....r...ir......r!�.rr mg me,1R^ i i i GO ANCHOR POSTS MUST BE INSTALLED TO A DEPTH OF NO LESS THAN 1/3 THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF P0ST — U5E 8"WIRE'U' TO SECURE FENCE BOTTOM Notes: 1. Blaze orange or blue plastic mesh fence for forest protection device,only. 2. Boundaries of Retention Area will be established as part of the forest conservation plan review process. • 3. Boundaries of Retention Area should be staked and flagged prior to installing device. 4.Avoid damage to critical root zone. Do not damage or sever large roots when Installing posts. E 5. Protection signs are required. 6. Device should be maintained throughout construction. Source:Adapted from Prince George's County,Maryland:Woodland Conservation Manuel and Forest Conservation Manual,1991 Wire Tree Protection Fence Figure • D:6 D - 7 Bradley Kilby- Brahma Premananda Ashram &Temple.doc � Page 1 • TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • SOUTH DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION 1 July 30,2001 Brad Kilby,Associate Planner 1 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 Re: Brahma Premananda Ashram&Temple Dear Brad, I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments: 1 1. The minimum required fire flow is 1500 gpm @ 20 psi . Prior to the issuance of building permits, documentation shall be provided that indicates the minimum fire flow is available at the required hydrants. (UFC Appendix III-A) 2. A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this development. The hydrants shall be located so that j all portions of both buildings are within 250 feet of a hydrant. (UFC 903.4) } 3. The Fire Department Connection(FDC)shall be located within 70 feet of a fire hydrant. 4. Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line,then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) 5. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (UFC Sec.8704) 1 6. A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. (UFC Chapter 9) 7. A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01,Appendix III-F,shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F,the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet,go to www.tvfr.com,choose"Fire Id Prevention",then choose"New Construction". (UFC Appendix III-F) 11I Please contact me at(503)612-7010 with any additional questions. I Sincerely, eqic, Y. 7101 iun, Eric T. McMullen Deputy Fire Marshal 7401 SW Washo Court,Suite 101 •Tualatin,Oregon> 07(11.(503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.tvfr.com • • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIIIGARD Community DeveCopment Shaping A Better Community DATE: July 19,2001 :C TO: Tualatin Valley Water District Administrative Offices IVED AUG 062001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division BY: STAFF CONTACT: Brad Iclby,Associate Planner 1x3881 Phone: 1503)639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW IPDRI 2001-00003/MINOR MODIFICATION LMMDI 2001-00010 ➢ BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE < REQUEST: A request for approval to modify the previous approval for development of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential dormitory for Monks) and a 9,000 square foot Temple. Although the Ashram building proposal has not changed from the previous approval, the design and location of the Temple building have changed, thus requiring a new Planned Development Review and a Minor Modification to the the Conditional Use Permit. LOCATION: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. The project is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard, north of SW Pacific Highway. COMP. PLAN/ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity,to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 2, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (q'Cease provide the furrowing information)Name of Perseids)Comm'a nting: 6,e,,, Phone Number[sl: �`�' �J Y G Y y • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIO'IIIGARD Community(DeveCopment Shaping Better Community DATE: luly 19,2001 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad IGlby,Associate Planner[x3881 AUG 01 2001 Phone: (5031 639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(PDRI 2001-00003/MINOR MODIFICATION IMMDI 2001-00010 ➢ BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE < REQUEST: A request for approval to modify the previous approval for development of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential dormitory for Monks) and a 9,000 square foot Temple. Although the Ashram building proposal has not changed from the previous approval, the design and location of the Temple building have changed, thus requiring a new Planned Development Review and a Minor Modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit. LOCATION: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. The project is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard, north of SW Pacific Highway. COMP. PLAN/ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 2, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. 7- Written comments provided below: Rio h , 'an 0 t Afty; rno► cj( o►k c r oac ak dt kJtuan- Ac..00\.. -Cfm NkOk -Ws 'lS AD AQt oce. dt)La oco,V Coe.& %h -tnt CPA/ 2rn0(ora v•KtbAcat is (PCease pnrvide the following information)Name of Perseids]Commenting: 3. ,00.\ J Phone Number(s): zlo I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS O CITY OF TI TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: July 19,2001 TO: Long Range Planning Staff: Duane Joel I v� RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division J U L 2 5 2001 STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner(x388) CITY OF TIGARD Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: 15031684-7291 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 2001-00003/MINOR MODIFICATION[MMDI 2001-00010 ➢ BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE < REQUEST: A request for approval to modify the previous approval for development of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential dormitory for Monks) and a 9,000 square foot Temple. Although the Ashram building proposal has not changed from the previous approval, the design and location of the Temple building have changed, thus requiring a new Planned Development Review and a Minor Modification to the the Conditional Use Permit. LOCATION: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. The project is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard, north of SW Pacific Highway. COMP. PLAN/ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 2. 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ('lease provide the follawing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: Phone Number(s): • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community cDeveCopment Shaping getter Community DATE: i iu 19 2001 TO: ` Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JUL 2 0 2001 STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner(x3881 CITY OF TIGARD Phone: (5031639,4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(PDRI 2001-00003/MINOR MODIFICATION(MMDI 2001-00010 ➢ BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE < REQUEST: A request for approval to modify the previous approval for development of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential dormitory for Monks) and a 9,000 square foot Temple. Although the Ashram building proposal has not changed from the previous approval, the design and location of the Temple building have changed, thus requiring a new Planned Development Review and a Minor Modification to the the Conditional Use Permit. LOCATION: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. The project is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard, north of SW Pacific Highway. COMP. PLAN/ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 2, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEAS 'CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Tease provide the foffowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: Phone Number(s): i. 11.1 I AJr 1 \ $. NW REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A getter Community DATE: July 19,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JUL 2 3 2001 STAFF CONTACT: Brad IGlby,Associate Planner(x3881 CITY OF TtGARD Phone: (503)639.4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[PDRI 2001-00003/MINOR MODIFICATION IMMD12001-00010 > BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE < REQUEST: A request for approval to modify the previous approval for development of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential dormitory for Monks) and a 9,000 square foot Temple. Although the Ashram building proposal has not changed from the previous approval, the design and location of the Temple building have changed, thus requiring a new Planned Development Review and a Minor Modification to the the Conditional Use Permit. LOCATION: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. The project is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard, north of SW Pacific Highway. COMP. PLAN/ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 2. 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. > Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: 1 I Phone Number(s): 31v I . • • • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner FROM: Robert Poskin,CET CBO Senior Plans Examiner (503) 639-4171 X392 DATE: July 23, 2001 RE: Comments—Brahma Premananda Ashram and Temple 1. Provide 3 on-site hydrants 2. The Temple will be reviewed as an A2.1 Occupancy. The Residential Dormitory for the Monks will most likely be reviewed as an R-1 (Congregate) Residence). Accessibility for the living area will most likely be reviewed in accordance with OSSC, Section 1106.1.10.6. The designer should take a cautious look at there rendering and the actual site plan. It appears they will experience code non-compliance for ramps. 3. The application calls for a two-story building. The rendering looks as though it includes a basement. Unless this is a true basement (More than 50% below grade) it becomes a 3-story building. Unless this building is going to be designed as a 2FR structure, two (2) stories are the maximum it can be. 4. At Site and Building Permit Application, a full Geo-Technical Report covering soil bearing and liquefaction potential will be required. • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community cDevetopment Shaping Better Community DATE: luly 19,2001 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilhy,Associate Planner(x3881 Phone: (5031639.4171/Fax: (5031 684-7291 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MR]2001-00003/MINOR MODIFICATION IMMDI 2001-00010 ➢ BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE < REQUEST: A request for approval to modify the previous approval for development of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential dormitory for Monks) and a 9,000 square foot Temple. Although the Ashram building proposal has not changed from the previous approval, the design and location of the Temple building have changed, thus requiring a new Planned Development Review and a Minor Modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit. LOCATION: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. The project is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard, north of SW Pacific Highway. COMP. PLAN/ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity.to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 2, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Tlease provide the follirwing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: I Phone Numher[sl: I • CITY . TIGARD REQUEST FOR COI' ENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: PPR 200/-05603 t' 2 FIL€NAMED° 1.4/2 ,14A._ �:�.:;:- f «E'" -CITI�N'INVOLVEME ?FANS _ _:. . . . - 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central ast OSouth DWest - ElProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book .- . . .. _ . ._ �. =:CITIFOFFICES; ,r , �r,. .;/J/' v.� �£; RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Supervisor UNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJPIanning-Engineering Techs. V PO E DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official GINEERING DEPTJBrian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer TER DEPTJDennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr- _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester PLANNER-TIME TO POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM! r. - PECIAL DISTRIC "1 _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*_ TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT V CLEANWATER SERVICES Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 > N k. LOCAL AND.STATE lUR DI TI CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN* _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street NE _ Irish Bunnell,Development S PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM 11! 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Carol Hall,Data Resource Center(ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP_333 SW First Avenue _ Mel Huie,Greenspaoes Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Rego Planner 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 — City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powermnes in Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Sale ,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) . _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) DOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGA/URB) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) • Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator _Phil Healy°GAA1Re! David Knowles,Ptanrsng Bureau Dv. Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm.1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer(CPNZCA)ss 14 1120 SW Fifth Avenue - Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(zcA)Ms 15 Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(ZCA)MS 14 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Portland,OR 97221-2414 I �� AND PE IAL�A6ENCI S LITY�PROVIDERS AN S C .. - ,� UTI ,- _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northem/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W.10th Avenue Albany, 97 any,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Anne.tiorw only) Pat McGann (If Project is whin'A Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Po nit,OR 97232 5 NW 169th Place,S-6020 VERIZ ton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street eaverton,OR 97006-4886 v// Portland,OR 97232 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _VERIZON _ QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Richard Jackson,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 —TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 —TCI CABLE(Apps.E.ofHall/N,of99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 15 0/0 eS * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 5-Jul-01) RAIJMJJ & &CREVARy MATERIALS A! �� AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY Y OFTIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigarcdf, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:i7. PDR200I-00003/MMD2001-00010 — BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM & TEMPLE 1 8/20/2001 AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer • ® Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Unit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXhibit'B", and by reference made a part hereof, on August 23,2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on August 23,2001, postage prepaid. OP Al - A ,/,- Tt._■: -:(•"' _.- 11"111. 1.)k A..,../i/d---- . (Person thfi Prepared (Ai.- STATE Off'ORGOJf ) County of'Was Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) / Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the can day of , 2001. .A , OFFICI AL S _ `. �, DIANA jELDER `i� PIOTAl3Y Ptii3UC-pR COhlMlSStpM ly EGON" - / /- AAY COAARAISSION�JfPIFt�B S� it ic�4/••�[ - F7:U7.2003 � I d'I. ' ' I � I I I My Commission Exp • U • • 120 DAYS=11/14/2001 CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve(opment Shaping Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 2001-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Case Numbers: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR)2001-00003 MINOR MODIFICATION (MMD) 2001-00010 Case Name: BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM &TEMPLE Name of Owner: Brahma Premananda Ashram Attn: Sam Additiwar Name of Applicant's Rep.: Alpha Engineering, Inc. Attn: Shelley Holly, Project Planner Address of Rep.: 9600 SW Oak Street, Suite 230 Portland, Oregon 97223 Address of Property: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard (West side of SW Hall Blvd., north of SW Pacific Hwy.) Tax Map/Lot Nos.: Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. 1S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503 . A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND MINOR MODIFICATION. THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANTS PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS Of REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 20, 2001 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: > A request for approval to modify the previous approval for development of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential dormitory for Monks) and a 9,000 square foot Temple. Although the Ashram building proposal has not changed from the previous approval, the design and location of the Temple building have changed, thus requiring a new Planned Development Review and a Minor Modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit. Zoning Designation: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Action: > ❑ Approval as Requested © Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: © Owners of Record Within the Required Distance © Affected Government Agencies © The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 23, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 7, 2001. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. S NOTICE.��OF FINAL,ORDERNO;2001.-03.PC , BY THEPLANNINgCOMMISSION • CITY QFTIGARC. f Community(Development SiapingA BetterCommunity : :�FOR TNErCITY OF TIGARD;�OREGON. :z � :-: : - �._._ ..,... A FINAL ORDER APPROVING A LAND USE APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE TO CONSTRUCT A TEMPLE AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING ASHRAM (TEMPLE) TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL USE OF TWO (2) BEDROOMS FOR THE RESIDENTS AND EIGHT (8) GUESTROOMS, AS WELL AS, A MINOR MODIFICATION TO RELOCATE AND RE-DESIGN THE BUILDINGS. THE COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THIS APPLICATION ON AUGUST 20, 2001. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS BASED THEIR DECISION ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. 120 DAYS = 11/14/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY. FILE NAME: BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM & TEMPLE ADDITION (A.K.A. SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA ASHRAM &TEMPLE) CASE NOS.: Planned Development (PDR) PDR2001-00003 Minor Modification (MMD) MMD2001-00010 APPLICANT/ Brahma Premananda Ashram PLANNING Alpha Engineering OWNERS: Attn: Sam Additiwar CONSULTANT: Shelley Holly, Planner 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Plaza West, Suite 230 Tigard, OR 97223 9600 SW Oak Street Portland, OR 97223 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Planned Development design approval and a Minor Modification to Conditional Use permit (CUP1999-00001) for a 9,000 square foot temple and an expansion of the existing Ashram to allow residential use of two (2) bedrooms for the residents and eight (8) guestrooms. The original design was considered as part of PDR1999-00002. LOCATION: The subject site is located at 11515 SW Hall Boulevard. The properties are also identified as WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION • The ,Planning Commission finds that the ...propose&-development :~meet§.. the applicable; approval criteria of the Tigard Community:Development Code and that the proposal-will not, adversely`affect the heath, safety and welfare of .the,City:- The Planning::Commision;: therefore, APPROVES the requested-:Land Use Application subject to the following conditions of approval: BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 1 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR.TO.ISSUANCE OF` ' THE;'SITE AND/OR,BUILD.ING:PERMITS: (Unless otherwise'noted, the Staff contact shall be:BRIAN RAGER,.Engineering Department 503-639-417:1:) Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kirby, 639-4171, ext. 388) for review and approval: 1. Submit a floor plan that shows the total area dedicated for living facilities (guestrooms and resident's rooms) will be less than 3,460 square feet. 2. The applicant shall continue to comply with the attached conditions of approval of CUP1999-00001. 3. The applicant shall place a six-foot cyclone fence with site obscuring slats along those property lines that are adjacent to residential uses. 4. Submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant shall submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. 5. Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays subject to the parking agreement with the office complex to the North. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30. 7. Additional right-of-way (ROW) shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, right-of-way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 8. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will provide an on-site water detention facility designed to meet Clean Water Services Design Standards. 9. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96- 44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 10. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $880 and it shall be paid pnor to issuance of a site and/or building permit. THE':FOLLOWING; CONDITIONS;SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A_�FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION - BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 2 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and 9 9 P ( 9 3 ) f approval: 11. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext. 388) for review and approval: 12. Construct all improvements as shown on the approved plans. Any modifications to plans must be approved by the Planning Division PRIOR to the modification. FAILURE-TO'�SATISFY;THEE,CONDITIONSOF-APPROVAL.WITHIN MONTHS OF,THE EFFECTIVE orEcnyg DATE OF THE PLANNING;7C:OMMISSION'SADECISIONy SHALLKRENDER THEE`PLANNING::COMMISSIONS:DECISION'VOID . ::: :v SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: On December 6, 1999, the Tigard Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a temple facility and Planned Development for the expansion of the Ashram to allow a residential component that would accommodate two full time residents and eight guests. The differences between the 2001 plan and the plan that was presented to the Planning Commission in 1999 are the location and design of the Temple Facility. The new location fits with the dimensional standards of the CDC. The Planning Commission also approved an adjustment to the front yard setback and denied a variance to address a perceived hardship asserted by access requirements. The site has a shared parking agreement with the office complex to the north (Hall Corporate Center). When the Hall Corporate Center was constructed (SDR97-00014NAR97-0008), a variance was approved for access width to allow 117 parking spaces from one, 30-foot-wide access drive (97 from the shared parking for Hall Corporate Center and Ashram site and 20 from the daycare site). Since then, the access has been improved to the minimum 40-foot requirement. The reason that this application is before the Planning Commission is that the new plan does not conform to the detailed plan approved by the Commission in 1999. As a result, approval of the preliminary and detailed plan by the Commission is necessary. Vicinity Information: The properties directly to the north and east of the site are zoned C-P and currently occupied by an office complex and a daycare center. The property to the south is zoned R-12 and developed with an apartment complex. The property to the west is zoned R-4.5 and developed with single-family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed with a residential house. The proposal is to continue to use the existing residence as an Ashram (residential dormitory for Monks) and expand it for a total of 4,840 square feet to allow for 2 full-time resident's bedrooms and 8 guestrooms. The proposal also involves the construction of a 9,000 square foot temple. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 3 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC 0 s SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE: ' Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to build a Temple (Religious Institution) and Ashram (Residential Dormitory Use). The Religious Institution is a Conditional Use in the C-P zone and the residential use is not allowed unless it is part of a Planned Development. This particular proposal is being presented to the Planning Commission to address the change in location and the change in building design. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. The proposed use (Religious Institution) required a Conditional Use permit which is a Type III-HO decision. The Conditional Use for the religious institution that was approved in 1999 is still valid except for the proposed modification. The requested living facility (residential use) requires a planned development which is a Type III-PC decision. The minor modification to the Conditional Use is a Type I-ministerial decision, however, in this case they will both be heard by the Planning Commission. When applications are heard concurrently, the highest review authority hears all applications, therefore, all aspects of this application will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Decision Making Procedures: Chapter 18.390 Describes the decision-making procedures. Type III-PC procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that predominantly contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III-PC actions are decided by the Planning Commission with appeals to or review by the City Council. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS There were six attendees at the neighborhood meeting. Their comments were all related to the height of the domes, the parking, and the landscaping buffers. The City has not received any comments related to this project. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this. case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. Specific Conditional Use Criteria Major modification of approved or existing conditional use Minor modification of approved or existing conditional use B. lanned Development Standards Process Specific Planned Development Criteria C. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards) D. Additional Planned Development Criteria BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 4 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Impact Study: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant is being required to dedicate right-of-way to allow an ultimate right-of-way width of 45 feet (approximately 20 feet of right-of-way). The Engineering Department has estimated the right-of-way acquisition to be approximately $3 per square foot. It is estimated, therefore, that the value of land being dedicated is $1,920. Upon completion of this development, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $12,927. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $40,397 ($12,927 divided by .32). The difference between the TIFF paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $12,927, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $27,470. Given the estimated cost of the half-street improvement and the unmitigated impact, the dedication requirement meets the rough proportionality test related to the impact of the development. A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements in Chapter 18.330. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.350, Planned Development; 18.390 Decision Making Procedures;18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts, 18.530, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.780, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 5 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • Major modification of approved or existing conditional use criteria: Section 18.330.020. ' A change in land use; The original conditional use permit was for a religious institution, and the proposal remains the same with a change in location and design. This criterion does not apply. An 10% increase in dwelling unit density; There is no proposed increase in dwelling unit density, therefore this criterion does not apply. A change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; There are no proposed changes to the type or location of the access way or parking areas. The access is proposed to remain in the same location. The access was improved to forty feet in width in the approval of a separate application dealing with the adjacent property. This criterion does not apply to the current proposal. An increase in the floor area proposed for non-residential use by more than 10% where previously specified; The new application proposes an increase of 270 square feet for non-residential purposes. This increase represents less than 3% of the proposed 9000 square foot temple, therefore, this criterion does not apply. A reduction of more than 10% of the area reserved for common open space and/or usable space; There is a proposed reduction of 2,580 square of landscaping and common open space. This reduction represents only 5% of the previously allotted amount, and therefore, this criterion does not apply. A reduction of specified setback requirements by more than 20%; The site plan indicates that all construction will meet the required setbacks of the underlying zone. This criterion does not apply. An elimination of project amenities by more than 10% where previously specified provided such as: 1. Recreational Facilities; There were no proposed recreational facilities associated with the previous project, therefore, this criterion does not apply. 2. Screening; There is an increase in the amount of screening that was proposed in the original approval on the south and west property lines, and no reduction anywhere else on the site. This criterion does not apply. 3. Landscaping provisions; The applicant is proposing to increase the amount of landscaping and has provided staff with a copy of an acceptable landscaping plan. This criterion does not apply. A 10% increase in the approved density; There is no proposed change in the density of this project, therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minor Modification of an existing Conditional Use Permit: Section18.330.020(C): Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in subsection B above shall be considered a minor modification. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 6 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • in above discussion this proposal has not made any changes that would As Illustrated. the abo p p y g , warrant consideration as a major modification. An applicant may request approval of a minor modification by means of a Type procedure, as regulated by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria in Subsection C3 below. Although the proposal can be reviewed by means of a Type I procedure, the design component of the Planned Development is reviewed by means of a Type Ill procedure, and is appropriately reviewed concurrently under this premise. A minor modification shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied following the Director's review based on the findings that: a. The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this title; and As conditioned by this review, the development will be in compliance with this title. b. The modification is not a major modification as defined in Subsection A above. As illustrated in the above discussion the proposal does not constitute a major modification. General A• •royal Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030: e si e size an• •imensions prove•e a•equa e area or e nee•s of the proposed use; The existing site size is 2.25 acres. This report evaluates the proposal and necessary setbacks, landscaping, etc. and as conditioned, the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed expansion. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; The site is relatively flat. There are trees on the site, but the development has been situated in such a way as to preserve the existing trees. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and • All public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary sewers, and water have adequate capacity to serve the site as discussed in detail elsewhere in this report. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional standards in the C-P zone, the additional dimensional requirements and approval standards for Religious Institutions specified The Conditional Use Standards Section 18.330.050.B.16 and the dimensions proposed for this • development. :, PROPOSED`= - -CONDITIONAL�USE=, . � Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft 98,010 sq.ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. SAME AS C-P 190'approx.[3] Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft. 25 ft 20 ft.*** - Side facing street on corner&through lots — 20 ft N/A - Side yard 0/20 ft[1]. 20 ft 20 ft - Rear yard 0/20 ft[1]. 20 ft 20 ft - Side of rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district — — - - Distance between property line and garage entrance — — — Maximum Height 45 ft. SAME AS C-P 23 ft.approx.[3] Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% SAME AS C-P 47% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% SAME AS C-P 53% - BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 7 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-000i0 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • [1) No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district [2) Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] Approximate figures are provided where the applicant's information is not dear or accuracy is questioned. "' Front yard setback granted by the Planning Commission in 1999. (File No. MIS1999-00026) As identified in the table above, the applicant's plans show that the dimensional standards for the base zone are met. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapter of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. Other applicable standards of the development code are discussed later in this report. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. Additional Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use. Section 18.330.030.B states that the Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; Because of the shared parking arrangement, the hours of operation were limited in the previous decision. This criterion has already been addressed. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; The facility as designed does not appear to create any impacts related to air pollution, glare, odor, and or dust. The nature of the use could create noise related to traffic coming and going, but the impacts would be no more recognizable than those associated with adjacent businesses. In any event, the applicant has proposed buffering and screening between the adjacent residential uses to minimize any such impact. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; The existing buffer requirements, as proposed and discussed further in this report, should be adequate to achieve this standard. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Based on the plans submitted, the tallest portion of the temple structure will be 48 feet in height, however, that height is based on those features of the building that are exempt from the height requirements. The actual height of the building will be close to 23 feet in height. The lot coverage is addressed previously in this report. The proposed design fits within the parameters of the standards, and therefore this criterion has been met. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; This criterion is discussed further in this report. Vehicle access is already limited and has been addressed in the previous approval. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 8 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • ' The applicant has approximately 32 feet of frontage on SW Hall Boulevard. The right-of-way is not to the required width of 45 feet from centerline, therefore, the applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way. This was discussed in the previous approval. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; The majority of parking is existing. The applicant has proposed to construct 8 additional parking spaces, and the screening that has been proposed accomplishes this standard. The proposal is required to address drainage by prior approval. This criterion was addressed by prior approval. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; Signs have not been indicated as proposed, however, compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone should be sufficient in the event that signs are desired. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; The applicant has not provided a lighting plan. Because of this, a condition is warranted requiring the applicant to submit a lighting plan indicating the location and intensity of the lighting to be provided. The applicant will be required to submit details of the lighting plan indicating that the light will be directed away from residential properties. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; Buffering and screening is discussed further in this report. Because the use proposed is no more intensive than other uses permitted in this zone, additional screening above and beyond what is already required, is not necessary. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; There are exiting fences on the south and west property lines. In addition, the applicant has proposed additional screening. No additional fencing should be required. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; No trees will be removed as a result of this proposal and there are no watercourses, habitat areas or drainage areas on the site. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the following conditions are warranted. CONDITIONS: • Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays with the exception of legal holidays. • The applicant shall comply with the conditions of the existing Conditional Use Permit. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 9 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • B. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL CRITERIA Planned Development (18.350): Chapter 18.350 allows the option for an applicant to create a more efficient, economically viable development that preserves natural land features while implementing the land use designation set forth for the property though the Comprehensive Plan. Section 18.350.020.B states that the Planned Development Review is a three (3)-step process, as follows: 1. The approval of the planned development overlay zone; 2. The approval of the planned development concept plan; and 3. The approval of the Detailed Development Plan. The applicant has requested that this application address Conceptual Planned Development and Detailed Planned Development approval. The approval of the Planned Development Overlay Zone was addressed by the previous decision. Allowed Uses: Section 18.350.060.B states that in all commercial zones, an applicant with a planned development approval may develop the site to contain all of the uses permitted outright in the underlying zone and, in addition, a maximum of 25% of the total gross floor area may be used for multi-family dwellings in those commercial zones that do not list multi-family dwellings as an outright use. The total square footage for all structures will be 14,530 square feet, therefore, only 3,632 square feet is permitted to be used for living areas. The applicant has proposed a total living area (guestrooms) of 3,456 square feet. This criteria has been met. Specific Planned Development Approval Criteria. The Commission shall make findings that the following criteria are satisfied when approving or approving with conditions, the concept plan. The Commission shall make findings that the criteria are not satisfied when denying an application. All the provisions of the land division provisions, Chapters 18.410, 18.420 and 18.430, shall be met; This proposal does not involve a division of land, therefore, this standard does not apply. Except as noted, the provisions of the following chapters shall be utilized as guidelines. A planned development need not meet these requirements where a development plan provides alternative designs and methods, if acceptable to the Commission, that promote the purpose of this section. In each case, the applicant must provide findings to justify the modification of the standards in the chapters listed in Subsection 3 below. The developer may choose to provide or the commission may require additional open space dedication and/or provision of additional amenities, landscaping or tree planting. Chapter 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standards; Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; Chapter 18.765, Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements; Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; and Chapter 18.780, Signs. Compliance with this standard is discussed, and conditioned as necessary in the following section: APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS. C. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Access, Egress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 10 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • ' connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; There is an existing walkway along the access drive and there is a walkway proposed from the parking lots to the proposed structures. This criterion has been met. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety . Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and The applicant has proposed marked walkways across the parking lot to connect the existing and proposed walkways. This standard, as proposed, has been satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans indicate that the proposed walkway will be concrete. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with more than 100 parking spaces is one 50-foot-wide access with a 40-foot pavement width or two 30-foot-wide access points with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. As discussed earlier, the access was improved to 40-feet in review of another proposal for the adjacent property. This criterion has been satisfied. Director's Authority to Restrict Access: Section 18.705.030.K states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial and industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections. The site already has shared parking and access, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: The application as proposed has met the necessary criterion of this section. Landscaping and Screening — Chapter 18.745: Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The property has no street frontage other than the access drive, therefore, this standard can not be applied. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 11 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • Land Use Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 requires that at a minimum the buffer between a proposed Commercial use and residential use must contain a 10-20 foot buffer with trees, lawn/groundcover, shrubs, and screening. The property to the west is zoned and developed with existing single-family residential homes. The applicant has proposed landscaping that would achieve the most stringent screening option. For example, the applicant has proposed to plant a mixture of trees and shrubs that would essentially screen the view of the facility from those properties to the South and West, as well as maintain and preserve the trees that border the Hall Corporate Centers parking lot. This criterion has been met. Screening - Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped Pparking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking ot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in i landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The majority of the parking is existing. The applicant has proposed 8 additional parking spaces with landscaping and screening. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been fully met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The amount of spaces required is based on the number of spaces on this site alone (30 spaces). Two ADA spaces are proposed.. This criterion is satisfied. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive to the site is existing and has been improved to forty feet. This criterion has been met. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 12 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • The parking lot is existing and parking spaces are clearly marked, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The existing parking area has curbs along the perimeter. This standard is satisfied. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The parking spaces are existing and the proposed spaces comply with this standard. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: • Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located ,inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed bicycle rack is 49 feet from the entrance of the Ashram and is not located in parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e.,. pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has provided detail of the bicycle parking rack. This criterion is satisfied. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for Religious Institutions, one (1) bicycle parking space is required for every 20 seats in the main assembly area. The applicant has indicated that there will be up to 178 chairs in the main assembly, therefore, nine (9) bicycle parking spaces are required and have been proposed. This criterion has been met. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 13 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Religious Institution is one (1) space for every two (2) seats. Because up to 178 seats will be provided in the main assembly area, 89 parking spaces are required. There are 30 parking spaces proposed on this, site and 74 on the adjacent site with which the applicant has a shared parking agreement. Because the total number of spaces available is 104 and the uses are compatible in that the peak hours do not overlap, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790 Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant's plans do not show any trees will be removed, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the applicant has not proposed to remove and trees, this standard has been met. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas have been met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards - Chapter 18.810: Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC) standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 14 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 60 to 90 right-of-way width and 12-foot lanes. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map, and is under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW according to the most recent tax assessor's map. This roadway will eventually be widened to have 5 lanes with bike lanes. This type of roadway will require the full 90-foot ROW. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate additional ROW along this frontage to provide 45 feet from the centerline. This has been addressed in the previous approval. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing sidewalk along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard adjacent to this site. No further sidewalk improvements are necessary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-Sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Sanitary sewer service for this site has been provided as a part of the Hall Park Office development. A 3-inch pressure line was installed within the shared driveway aisle and ties into the existing public sewer line in SW Hall Boulevard. The pressure sewer line is necessary due to the fact that this site is at a lower elevation that what the public line in Hall Boulevard can serve. The new building on this site must be constructed to have a sewer pump system. No further public sewer improvements are necessary. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on fhe provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). The Hall Park Office development lies uphill of this site. The majority of the storm water from that development was directed to the north toward the Highway 217 ROW. The drainage plan for this site should be able to accommodate any sheet flow that reaches this site from the wooded area north of the proposed building. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that . the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 15 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • In 1997, the Clean Water Services completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that lan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates that there will be a vegetated swale constructed adjacent to the southern boundary of the site. It is not clear whether the applicant intends for this facility to serve as a detention facility combined with surface water treatment. The applicant may need to adjust their storm drainage plan to accommodate the detention requirement. The plan also indicates that the storm water from this site will be directed to an existing storm drainage line that is located on the adjacent parcels to the east of this site. This existing private storm drainage line is located within an easement granted in favor of this site, as well as the Hall Park Office and Kindercare sites. This fact was discovered as a part of the approval for the Hall Park Office development. No public storm drainage work is necessary to support this development. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted ' transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in-lieu is liproposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead nes. The frontage along this site is 32 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $880. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS REGARDING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District's (TVWD) service area. As a part of the Hall Park Office development, domestic and fire water lines were installed to serve both-that project and this project. No additional public water line work will be necessary to support this development. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 16 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the Clean Water Services Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. As was stated above, the applicant is proposing to treat the onsite storm water runoff in a vegetated swale. It appears that the site plan has allowed enough room for an adequately sized swale. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per Clean Water Services regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (1JSB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will a $30 to account for the new building. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the street utility and improvement standards have not been met outright, however, if the applicant complies with conditions specified at the front of this report, the standards will be met. D. ADDITIONAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Section 18.350.100(B)(3) (a) through (I) provides additional Planned Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The following have been discussed previously in this report and will not be discussed in this Section: 18.350.100.B.3.b, 18.350.100.B.3.f, 18.350.100.B.3.g, 18.350.100.B.3.i, 18.350.100.B.3.j, 18.350.100.B.3.k Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: The streets, buildings and other site elements shall be designed and located to preserve the existing trees, topography, and natural drainage to the greatest degree possible; Structures located on the site shall not be in areas subject to ground slumping and sliding; There shall be adequate distance between on-site buildings and other on-site and off--site buildings on adjoining properties to provide for adequate light and air circulation and for fire protection; The structures shall be oriented with consideration for the sun and wind directions, where possible; and Trees preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 17 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • • The buildings have been located on the site to preserve existing trees. There is not significant topography or drainage that will be affected as a result of this proposal. There are no known areas of ground slumping or sliding on site. The proposed setbacks will insure that there is adequate light and air circulation. Fire protection has been considered and the location of these buildings will not hamper fire protection. There are no trees proposed to be removed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the relationship to the natural and physical environment standards have been met. Privacy and Noise: Non-residential structures which abut existing residential dwellings shall be located on the site or be designed in a manner, to the maximum degree possible, to protect the private areas on the adjoining properties from view and noise; FINDING: The temple will be the closest structure to the single-family dwellings west of the site. In addition to the increase in proposed landscaping along the property lines, the temple is located 20 feet away from the property line, the activities will occur on the interior of the structure, and the fact that it is oriented towards Hall Boulevard, will help ensure that this standard is met. The Ashram is considered a residential structure, therefore, this standard does not apply to that structure. Private Outdoor Area - Multi-Family Use: In addition to the requirements of subparagraph (3), each ground-level residential dwelling unit shall have an outdoor private area (patio, terrace, porch) of not less than 48 square feet; Wherever possible, private out oor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun; and Private outdoor spaces shall be screened or designed to provide privacy for the use of the space. While the use is not truly multi-family, all but 2 of the rooms have a deck, the other 2 have access to a deck via a shared room. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas - Multi-Family Use: In addition each multiple-dwelling development shall incorporate shared usable outdoor recreation areas within the development plan as follows: Studio units up to and including two bedroom units, 200 square feet per unit; and Three or more bedroom units, 300 square feet per unit. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable from adjacent units for reasons of.crime prevention and safety; The required recreation space may be provided as follows: It may be all outdoor space; or It may be part outdoor space and part indoor space; for example, an outdoor tennis court and indoor recreation room; or It may be all public or common space; or It may be part common space and part private; for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room, and balconies on each unit; or Where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. While this is not truly multi-family because each room is not a self-contained unit, there are shared worship areas, yoga classrooms and open space. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. Public Transit: Provisions for public transit may be required where the site abuts a public transit route. The required facilities shall be based on: (a) The location of other transit facilities in the area; and (b) The size and type of the proposed development. The required facilities shall be limited to such facilities as: (a) A waiting shelter; (b)A turn- out area for loading and unloading; and (c) Hard surface paths connecting the development to the waiting area. BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 18 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC i • ' The access drive fronts SW Hall Boulevard, which is on a transit route, however, because the entire frontage is taken up by the access drive, this standard can not be applied. FINDING: Because the entire frontage on the transit route is taken up by the access drive, there is no place to provide transit facilities and, therefore, this standard can not be applied. Floodplain Dedication: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. The proposal is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the site is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, this standard does not apply. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City Building Division has reviewed the proposed and offered the following comments: Provide 3 on-site hydrants, The temple will be reviewed as an A2.1 Occupancy. The Ashram will most likely be reviewed as an R-1 Congregate residence. Accessibility for the living area will most likely be reviewed in accordance with OSSC, Section 1106.1.10.6. The designer should take a cautious look at the rendering and the actual site plan. It appears they will experience code non-compliance for ramps. The application calls foe a two-story building. The rendering looks as though it includes a basement. Unless this is a true basement, (more than 50% below grade) it becomes a 3- story building. Unless the building is going to be designed as a 2FR structure, two (2) stories are the maximum it can be. At Site and building permit application, a full geo-technical report covering soil bearing and liquefaction potential will be required. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • The minimum required fire flow is 1500 gpm @ 20 psi . Prior to the issuance of building permits, documentation shall be provided that indicates the minimum fire flow is available at the required hydrants. (UFC Appendix III-A) • A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this development. The hydrants shall be located so that all portions of both buildings are within 250 feet of a hydrant. (UFC 903.4) • The Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located within 70 feet of a fire hydrant. • Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) • Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (UFC Sec. 8704) BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 19 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC • S • A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. (UFC Chapter 9) • A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, go to www.tvfr.com, choose "Fire Prevention", then choose "New Construction". (UFC Appendix III-F) The City Police Department has had the opportunity to review the proposal and has requested that a lighting plan be submitted for review and approval. The City of Tigard Property Management/Operations Department has had the opportunity to review the proposal and has offered no comments or objections. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated into the body of this report. SECTION X. CONCLUSION It is further ordered that the applicant and the parties to these proceedings be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED: This 20th day of August. 2001 by the City of Tigard Planning Commission. Nick Wilson, Planning Commission Chair BRAHMA PREMENANDA ASHRAM&TEMPLE ADDITION PAGE 20 OF 20 PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2001-03 PC -L— I I I 11 I U# I i l_ I I I I I l___L._J CITY of TWA' SPRUCE Sr 1 I SPR ST � � GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM a n a I I I ` I 4 ILP ! III _ VICINITY MAP THORN CT J I I .� T F co co a■ S— E■1111111111. PDR2001 -00003 - ri Spy :` : - M M D200 I -000 I 0 �" ■, , =■ ■■ ■■■■� ■■�■ ■ ■1■■■l► ■,• um DAKOTA I -at , 1! �NA ■■ I � g■■�■. BRAHMA 7-•- mkr 'I t: ■� as I �, ■m P RE MANAN DA __D �■ fa■■ J 11 ASHRAM & TEMPIE ■ —�u MAW - : LE F- U___ _ Ii■ � AEI N14111111 I- RFF ■ ■ \ , "ek., --Q■\ _ .\ �■ LOMITA my '1111 • N �.. to0 41 .L . /V(el MIIII:.■ + ■ir. ■� �' N r ■ � � -,,... (n■■Z, •. *tt . 0 200 400 600 Feet / ♦-� ■ ■• • 9 1"=498 feet ow"r#1 •'� ' �� r► A .. .444 S ilir, fUINIP City of Tigard InfortaUon on thin map la for general IoceU c ony end should be veri0ed with the Development Servieea Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 _ . is• (503)639-4171 http:llwww.cl.tipard.or.ua Community Development Plot e:Jul 19,2001;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR ...\\ . 0 17 228.78' �•y •` A • --I,I? r•;.;ICr2' • A9i METZGER 17'111` �/It Q. ‘ rut .'''/ M' ° mi. • ...., ..Rd NO d \ LI I 0 . MMI MI a:.l DEMO IL CAME • „«a a ,D• Smuenmt a MI DECIDUOU F m 1 I• n :!� sill`" ......\••■■■, III B raOVO Mil 6 ...al in, rr Q I v.w a•uwert IM.' •• w..n r.ot Q 1� ...11112.1` III •gym. ■w 6 w+e ■ I�91�■� ■■■■ rra rar ao.n'�r nark ova rr r owurr I ■ ■■■■■■■■■ terse�"id�Ort �� ' G Q •.1■■■■■■■■■ Biro 1` N'•00.00•E 287.79' ' 0 ! , • PROPOSED , ' '*��`I:' I �. EASE p5001197 m wi-r. . CO UPPER LE FF 270.0 0 IIIIII'�IIIIIi� ' - - - - - - - ' _ - ° - bI LOWER LE FF 217.0 r I a L ■■■ N8911'11-E * ::::: Q • r- hm+ "Na oIIT0 aorc T • r-DRIVEWAY o m.;� to. n .m ° m;i...r, _ --....raara.,uua{p f- -- i� 6,„& Q e r-= , W a 8 d p�„i S1RUCtU u TFF 219± = tASENDiT L PROPOSED ASHRAM — „� 11/4.OOP MOO Ff 2193 (MATCH EXIST) N89 1�'E -- ! rp.MVO ■ # b •�-- 21'E 2.ti R •• �l"!E • • • CITY of TIGARD PDR2001.000031MMD2001.00010 Cm OF MARC SITE PLAN N BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM & TEMPLE (Map is not to scale) • S EXHIBIT B Alpha Engineering, Inc. PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 Shelley Holly, Project Planner BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM & TEMPLE 9600 SW Oak Street, Suite 230 NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 2001-03 PC BY Portland, OR 97223 THE PLANNING COMMISSION Brahma Premananda Ashram Attn: Sam Additiwar 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Sue & Tom Nebert 11530 & 11502 SW Lomita Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 0 A TIGAJD PLANNING COMMISSION �!► CITY OF TIGARO OREGON NOTICE:. PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS ON THIS SHEET. AGENDA ITEM#: 5 + Pages of DATE OF HEARING: g/ZD/ CASE NUMBER(S): --� 00 - 0000 3 OWNER/APPLICANT: • 6 h 11_4 fCLe /q c h ran-, LOCATION: l) 515 SA) 4-1411 yr3 I U D. PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, AND ZIP CODE PROPONENT (For the proposal) OPPONENT (Against the proposal) • (Print Name/Address/Zip&Affiliation) (Print Name/Address/Zip&Affiliation) Name: /k e!/l - r1(1t t J �'1 1� 3, Name: p�� WB� Address: ail OA. 9 Address: y "It 5 W g Ci State: al Zip 1 Z Z� City � State d� Zip"V�O�E�3 U5t3 ta-#t3 Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: • City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: • • -PM9200 / -3 WILL CALUPICK UP Fill out this form completely and attached it securely to the document(s). Bring it to the WILL CALL / PICK UP area at the Front Counter and file in the appropriate alphabetical slot by last name/company. TO: S\€11€1 -tO((y 1 COMPANY NAME: QT, DOCUMENT NAME: S;mos co, pes-'•1) s;ke FROM: Rrz qty DEPARTMENT: P t o n,n' DATE TO WILL CALL: 1 'l ao l o I FEE: S i w) Ft-e, If the document is not picked up within 5 working days of the "DATE TO WILL CALL", the document will be returned to the originator. RETURNED TO ORIGINATOR DATE: • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community I, (Patricia L. Lansford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of gard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Chec(Appropriate Box(s)Below) ® NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING FOR: PDR2001-00003/MMD2001-00010 — BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM & TEMPLE 1 8/20/01 File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) _ City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission _ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Mild"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on July 30,2001,and deposited in the United States Mail on Lilly 30,2001, postage prepaid. Ii ��IL • (Person th- ' epared Noti STATE OAF oEGoN ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) 4 Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 3 day of , 2001. 4! OFFICIAL SEAL p..X.4F DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 (1.4, 4/, / NOTARY PUBLIC OF 0 ,I N My Commission Expires: 9/7 D_ NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOOR,VENDOR OR SELLER: • EXHIBIT A THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES T IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION,AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 2001 AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NOS.: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 2001-00003 MINOR MODIFICATION (MMD) 2001-00010 FILE TITLE: BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM & TEMPLE APPLICANT: Alpha Engineering, Inc. OWNERS: Brahma Premananda Ashram Shelley Holly, Project Planner Attn: Sam Additiwar 9600 SW Oak Street, Suite 230 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A request for approval to modify the previous approval for development of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential dormitory for Monks) and a 9,000 square foot Temple. Although the Ashram building proposal has not changed from the previous approval, the design and location of the Temple building have changed, thus requiring a new Planned Development Review and a Minor Modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit. LOCATION: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. The project is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard, north of SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT V\1TEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOS ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (254) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7)DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (254) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT(503)639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. ---_•- ._ —._.__ ■m■■_ I ni VICINITY MAP Na am IMO.liar la-mm."16 um = A■ ■_ :PDR2001-00003 'R,;` NI ■1 Mii i:ia ■till ■ ■z o.. �� CM ■ ■-as El' ■m BRAHMA �D ■ I.• MI ��\ ■∎=■ ■ I'�� ,��� ■ PREMANANDA `■ Era �in 1i i 01■ raw ASHRAM & TEMPLE 1111 LIE. IMI=1111. 1.11.1‘n 1. iiM' u■ �.�� 1, ��- ■Lit P:��� �` I , :s ' 1111111171 r Vs 1=1.1.1 ME VW # ■Allv1p. ...,A ill* Cay of Tigard .-411A.7";44* ov imkN11--- ► ' O PM 151350A-05100 • 1513500-03618 • EXHIBIT B 2000-01'4 PARTITION PLAT BRADFORD GARY TR OWNERS OF LOTS 2-3 305 E FIFTH 2993 N CANYON RD THE DALLES,OR 97058 PROVO,UT 84604 1 S 136CC-00301 1 S 135DA-01400 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD#103 11515 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-03300 is 1350A-03503 ANSARI BEHROOZ&SHEILA BRAN REMANANDA ASHRAMA 11540 SW 90TH AVE 11515 HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIG D,OR 97223 1 S1350D-03606 1S135DA-01700 APPLETON PROPERTIES INC BRAZIL CLARENCE E&MARY JEAN 7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 PO BOX 23064 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 151350D-03800 1 S135DA-0166000 BAUER LENA RICHARD T BRAZZ `O ENCE E&MARY JEAN BAUER RICHARD W PO B 23064 11734 SW 90TH TIG D, R 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03704 1S 135DA-02100 BAXTER ALAN T AND SOOK HEE BROWN MARGARET ANN 11650 SW 90TH 19065 SW JOHNSON AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97006 1S1350C-07900 1S135DA-01900 BELL LEO LAMAR TRUSTEE BRO GARET ANN 11635 SW 90TH 19065 JOHNSON AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 AL A,O 97006 151350D-03604 1 S 135DA-02000 BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A BRO ARGARET ANN 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE 19065 JOHNSON AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALO A, 97006 • 1S1350D-03600 1S135DD-02000 BERGMANN FLOYD H BROWN MILTON 0 MARINE M BY PACIFIC MOBILE 11600 SW 90TH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE TIGARD,OR 97223 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 1513500-03615 1S135DD-02001 BOUSE JOHN R BRO MILTON 0 11470 SW LOMITA BY PAC MOBILE TIGARD,OR 97223 ADMINI TIVE OFFICE 2106 HOCO ST MIL AUKIE,OR 97222 1S1350A-02701 • 1S13500-03607 BROYLES JENNIE A FITZPATRICK DAVID*BETTY L 11260 SW 90TH 7615 SW CHESTNUT STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DD-01600 1 S135DB-02603 CACH GERALD C AND JOAN L FORMAN MATTHEW B& 12525 SW MAIN KATHLEEN A TIGARD,OR 97223 11403 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DD-00100 1S135DA-02802 CHRISTIE LACEY TRUSTEE FREEDMAN STEPHEN H& 22020 SW AEBISHER RD ARCHER CANDACE SHERWOOD,OR 97140 11300 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03603 1S135DA-04200 COSHOW ELIZABETH I GHITA VASILE&DOMNICA 11425 SW LOMITA AVE 11310 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DA-01000 1 S 135DA-00500 DALTON DAVID L GRAHAM DON G AND 8530 SW PFAFFLE RD BROSSIA PAUL F TIGARD,OR 97223 11260 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-01200 1 S 135DD-03701 DAL AVID L GRIGG DOREEN E 8530 PFAFFLE RD 11700 SW 90TH AVE TIG D,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DA-03200 1S135DB-02604 DOLL THOMAS C AND DORIS M HEITZ NANCY P AND RONALD L 11500 SW 90TH 11401 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1350A-02803 1 S135DD-03612 ELLIS DANIEL& HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B ARACO-ELLIS PATRICIA FLORENCE L 11290 SW 90TH AVE 9620 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S135DB-02602 1 S 135DD-03608 FAULK JEFF&DOROHTY M HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B&FLORENCE 11435 SW 90TH do HERBERHOLZ LARRY TIGARD,OR 97223 9620 SW 90TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DC-08100 1S 135DB-00400 FERRIER GERALD L&JOYCE H HOFFMAN MICHAEL J 11565 SW 90TH AVE 1223 NW 24TH#5 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97210 161350D-01601 • 161350D-03617 • HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN&MARY P 12215 SW 33RD AVE 11410 SW LOMITA AVE PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-01300 161350D-03609 HOLM S AMUEL M/JANET M MACKINNON FERN E& 12215 33RD AVE DALE VIRGINIA E POR D,OR 97219 11625 SW LOMITA TIGARD,OR 97223 1613500-03605 1 S 1350D-01201 HUGHES JEFFREY M&TAMI JO BARE MAINS ELDON H JR AND 11485 SW LOMITA AVE MAINS TODD K TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 1178 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 161350B-00600 1S136CC-00400 JACKSON LINDA J MCGUIRE ROBERT J& 11545 SW 90TH AVE MCGUIRE THOMAS P& TIGARD,OR 97223 MCGUIRE WILLIAM A • 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-02900 1 S 135DD-03611 JUNG MARTIN MARIA MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R AND 11400 SW 90TH K YVONNE TIGARD,OR 97223 MCLOUGHLIN ROBERT C 5400 SW 198TH AVE ALOHA,OR 97007 161350A-03800 1 S135DA-02801 KAULUWAI CORPORATION MCTAGGART BRENT 2445-A MAKIKI HEIGHTS DRIVE PO BOX 231207 HONOLULU,HI 96822 TIGARD,OR 97281 161350A-01401 1S135DD-04400 KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC MIKE/KAY INVESTMENT LLC REAL ESTATE TAX COMPLIANCE C/O FIRST AMERICAN EXCHANGE CORP BEXAR SAVINGS TOWER 1700 SW FOURTH AVE#103 1777 NE LOOP 410#1250 PORTLAND,OR 97201 SAN ANTONIO,TX 78217 161350A-01801 161350C-08200 L N PROPERTIES LLC MOLITOR LAWRENCE R/NANCY L 11481 SW HALL BLVD STE 100 11587 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1 ••-0 a. 1S135DD-03614 L N PR•• RTIES LLC NEBERT SUSAN ETTA&TOMMY HENRY 11481 '1 ' L BLVD STE 100 11530 SW LOMITA TIG• 'II,0' 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1350A-04800 16135DD-03613 LANDRISE DEVELOMENT LTD NEBERT TOMMY HENRY PO BOX 1212 SUSAN E LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 11530 SW LOMITA TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1350A-01800 • 1S13500-03619 • NEDELISKY MICHAEL J QUILLEN DEANNA MARIE 25 82ND DR 11560 SW 90TH GLADSTONE,OR 97027 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 1350A-02702 1S13500-01400 NESS DORIS A SAYLER ANNA R 11230 SW 90TH PO BOX 23757 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S135DD-03700 1 S135DA-01100 OH JANG W AND YON SOON SCHAEFFER DONALD M • 11630 SW LOMITA MUNCH MICHAEL T TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 23697 TIGARD,OR 97281 1S135DA-01500 1 S135DD-03616 OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION SCHROCK DONNA R R/W PROPERTY MANAGEMENT UNIT 11440 SW LOMITA 355 CAPITAL ST NE RM 411 TIGARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97301 1 S 135DA-05000 1S 1350A-04300 OSEI-AGYEMANG SIMON SMITH SHARON LOU 8950 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11330 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DD-01800 1 S135DA-03100 PANG KEIKO TR SNYDER WILLIAM T&STEPHANIE 46-442 HOLOLIO ST 11480 SW 90TH KANEOHE,HI 96744 TIGA.RD,OR 97223 1S1350D-03703 1S13500-01300 PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE STEELE NANCY TRUSTEE BY SUMMIT REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT PO BOX 230057 5320 SW MACADAM AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97201 • 1S135D -03300 1S135DD-03301 PARKE J OME W TRUSTEE TIGARD PROPERTIES INC BY SUM T REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT BY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 5320 M CADAM AVE 2106 SE OCHOCO PORTLAND,OR 97201 MILWAUKIE,OR 97277 1S13500-05200 1S1350B-12000 PATEL ASHOK A& VICE ALICIA K&RICHARD A PATEL SURYAKANT 11375 SW 90TH AVE 14850 NE SANDY TIGARD,OR 97223 'PORTLAND,OR 97230 1 S135013-02600 151350A-03000 POWLOSKI C KENT&LISA VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE 11405 SW 90TH ARVIDSON OVE S&DENISE L TIGARD,OR 97223 11405 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03620 • • WANG PING-JUI KAI 22600 SW 93RD TER TUALATIN,OR 97062 1 S 135DA-04900 WELLS WILLIAM& WELLS DENISE 8960 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DB-00500 WHITE BARBARA A 11495 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S13500-03602 WORSECH HAROLD A SANDRA K 11450 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 Alpha Engineering, Inc. Shelley Holly, Project Planner 9600 SW Oak Street, Suite 230 Portland, OR 97223 Brahma Premananda Ashram Sam Additiwar 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 • Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGAIZD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 19-Jun-01 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 --■,N Atik (41 7 ■ \ \ / . COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503)684-0360 Notice TT 9931 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising City of Tigard • 0 Tearsheet Notice 13 125 SW Hall Blvd. tigard,Oregon 97223 • 0 Duplicate Affidavit Accounts Payable • • .,. , •, •,,. AFFIDAVIT OF PUB , ' . • . .,:•.' " • The 'following will, be considered by the .Tigard 'Planning STATE OF OREGON, ) ss Commission on'Monday, August 20, 2001, it 7:30 p.m. at the . COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) Tigard Center- own Hall, 13125 SWHall Boulevard,Tigard, Q Oregon. . ." ,,,,,,,1 ' ,. , .,o'yez I, 'Kathy Snyder Bothpubliaral and.Written,teatiMony,is-invited.;The public yheaktt: being first duly sworn, depose and say that I:on Ahik matter will be,;conclucted,;inaccOrt49cP'wich.':C1413t18_f,-,k9;!0,t', Director, or his principal clerk, of the T 1 ga rOfilie,TiOrd MtiniCiii45,0)& :ati"&.,,j.iii,ei::iiiiitiftiCedii4.45,0tit.i a newspaper of general circulation as defin .Hdifirieoffi4r. 1'40064 Maytie'ltibniiited irc:ivritiniptiCii4tO Or and 193.020; published at migarri at the public hearing or'verbally at the public hearing only.Failure to . , . , , aforesaid county and state; that the raise an issUe„ii0eispit Or„by:letter at some point prior to the close of • • ' - - - ' , • ' I II -IIII the';Ii4riiii**040&r-tys'..iiitiiie4 or evidence sufficient to -"life, i 'i. 'Siii Ority . cr i : 6:.*iiii-i ii ilk' b' th a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, v:.0?,W,I.: oll F,,.9gii.,,..,..1.1-,, -..,aP 0,141I ,,,9•'r, ,0 !I, e' ..,tegitersi;preelUdeSianaptieilanti'failure.tii,speCiO:the criterion from entire issue of said newspaper for ONE the:C6itithiiriitDiVelerinieritCrideor Comprehensive Plan at which consecutive in the following issues: a comment is:;direetedpreClUdes an appeal to the.Land se Board,of Appeals based on that criterion. .• . August 2, 2001 Further information maybe obtained from the Planning Division , „. . . . ._ (staff dontaCt:l3r41',Kilby),:it:1312,5 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223,or by"caliing'503-639-4171. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant , . • , l . and the applicable criteria are available for inspection it no cost. A k ifilb„,6_, AI A. . , I.copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no di cost.at least seYen (7) ClaYs:;.Prior to the hearing, and copies for all v ! items can alSO:136;ProVided-af aleiiSOnableOS:i::,,,, . , ... Subscribed and sworn to efore me thisaaci PUBLIC IIELABING,I'Etiqi''. ' " • . .',•, ',"" • ;• , .. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW.(PDR)2001-00003/ - '• ' , MINokiwoomapoN(Mmtp),20.ol000lo No a: , ' BRAIIMA`PRWANANDA'AsHRAM.4TEMPLE • . REQUEST: A request for to modify the previous approval My Commission Expires: fofdeveloptiient of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential adtiiiiiiSiy.foi;:Mciriks).add.a 9,000 square.foot Temple.AlthOugh the AFFIDAVIT Aiii4in.',81iildiniIROPOial has not changed from the 'Previous. .-000,4:0,=',,46$igri,.:anct.location.of',the,Temple building have changed, thus reqUirmiga.neW;Planneil Development Review and a, MiriOi.'140ClitiCatiOn ',;t54;;;; .ti ',. 010.g Conditional' Use Permit.: LOQATION:11'6,1`%SW:?tiai existing WCTM:1S135p4, Tax Lots 1400.aiiiv,350 The project is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard,north.of'SW Pacific Highway. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/ZONING DESIGNATION C-P: Professional/Administrative,,Commercial District. The C-P,.zoning district is.deSigtied'tOlicOinnipaoe eiVic,and btisiriess/pipfessional services and CoiriPatible:SrippriO,seMdea,eg:;,COUyenience,retail and • personal.services,,restauiants;Jn close proximity to residential.:âreás and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code..Chapters; '18.330; 18.350, 18:390; 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.730,'18.745, 18.755, 18.765; 18.790,.18:795;,and 18:810. . . ..:;1411 , ..,..;:.;., j? :,,rommoittons-el lag nil glitlilatro..11115,11115Lrlevai.:7,r, ariTyZp.:. ■ v- : . .• ------ - , .,-;,,• ', :'‘on i! q.'urGb■' "' isin 7111 .m.........111crtiiiilaaimiffil eil'e. .10 :-= :. ..iii ...Nli..--. - - --1---PDR200140003 ''', :2•2:. JiLl'i.v711111111....'"'=1 . ..am. -4.1110100140010 . Aliiii nin11111101 .7111Lim •••1 El=21L1==iabtliisai mem iii==in Inv, :.:913,....: LI Muciii■-•••■=1 uniannm 11 ii.-11111-i . me.......„Mi PREMAIODA .: is iII ... IN:ASHRAM &TEMPLE: , isor...vim! ligt ' n:on.••=trz.:impalt. iaiLo Niek u .;, , . ..—....... : a : ::Au,=,..,.. : • ' -l- 7 z,„191110`4041:11"1-;Fug- 111111k'• . 'IA 0 1 . ' :' 1211.-- ........,,.... b... 004 '• ,: :, . '- ., : '1111111k:h. ;fa mk,Nq=.1. CV .. ' •' 1 • riii A • .. A eo, . ,•:::,:::.: sm low iliNT% : 1..=-1P6 112--qtrA.4.40. ..ii ••,: •, •■•:fiNr. > ALA .' . ara.,;.Vat... .4.0 ,-- ok ■-• - . h t...a.-- ...• ,79931:•- PutilishiAuguSt,2,2001..,,•:„,, ,•.,,.. ', , , , . :, •,,,::.': , • , , , v ... CITY of TIGARD . . . / �� 0E00RAPHIO INFORMATION SYSTEM 1-_____ - _ AREA NOTIFIED ST _ -- (500') 1 1- 1613 ' : 00 50003600 V 161650002102 l* Cr 3500, .i CO I'- 161350002100 CO r- co N- _ 181353102101 •.50005 O) I, ,,;,, 1613 0500 08 .03 3102000 FOR: PDR2001-00003 131353109200 •: 50002801 , 01900 131353169566 RE: 1 S 13 5 DA 1400 \ 15115°6,2°60¢ �060i8'2 2 SUBJECT LOTS PFAFFLE & 3503 3 W 1 15135000350, i 0007100 161359802600 � 151350002000 161350003618 I :01 350001100 I i50BO26Qi350802600 •53103,,∎ \\ 151368800000 1��` 16135310110 1 1613531 ' 0 I n 181350802602 ...50003801 I 50°06' •. ' Sir ,/ ` ' 5000381`` ` 111553101600 I 181350000400 181is3107100 \ 1111368900301 Property owner information W 1 ir50003 1513501101500 is valid for 3 months from 181350800500 13p5000ngg , 7lr'N�����`��� the date printed on this map. 50003;' <3506036 ' 181 5310 0 50003° 50001'\\ 181350001901 lir 381350180°600 161353103300_ 511110161 Cl)I- 1513503002 0 O 1$13 .500038 8 500001 0)151350003818 „350003: 151350001800 =1.3500°1°:, 0) 151350002600 D ' LOMITA e " 59003e 0 r 350000100 •151350807800 181750003300 .500020 1813500 \ 151350003704 131350002001 1618500013 I 1313590 +700 181650006706 ,.350005201 i500037r1 1313500015,. Ilk , Ili 181350007800 4. G W- a351111,.,,0 o v 15 •N 151350003301 . Q III■ 0 100 200 300 400 Feet I—.■ CP 1".324 feet 111111111 Z ►. i 0 A ME 0 ill - '�i Z . m gg City of Tigard p J ` Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. .. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Si Tigard,OR 97223 (503)6394171 -,,_ �.- _- -_ _ htlp:llwww.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jul 18,2001;C:\magicWIAGIC03.APR • • 1S135DA-05100 1S135DD-03618 2000-014 PARTITION PLAT BRADFORD GARY TR OWNERS OF LOTS 2-3 305 E FIFTH 2993 N CANYON RD THE DALLES,OR 97058 PROVO,UT 84604 1 S136CC-00301 1S135DA-01400 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD#103 11515 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-03300 1S135DA-03503 ANSARI BEHROOZ&SHEILA BRAN REMANANDA ASHRAMA 11540 SW 90TH AVE 11515 HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIG D,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03606 1 S 135DA-01700 APPLETON PROPERTIES INC BRAZIL CLARENCE E&MARY JEAN 7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 PO BOX 23064 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 1S135DD-03800 1S135DA-01600 BAUER LENA RICHARD T BRAZ ENCE E&MARY JEAN BAUER RICHARD W PO B 23064 11734 SW 90TH TIG D, R 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03704 1S1 35DA-02100 BAXTER ALAN T AND SOOK HEE BROWN MARGARET ANN 11650 SW 90TH 19065 SW JOHNSON AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97006 1 S135DC-07900 1S135DA-01900 BELL LEO LAMAR TRUSTEE BRO RGARET ANN 11635 SW 90TH 19065 JOHNSON AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 AL A,O 97006 1S135DD-03604 1S135DA-02000 BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A BRO ARGARET ANN 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE 19065 JOHNSON AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALO A, 97006 1 S135DD-03600 1 S135DD-02000 BERGMANN FLOYD H BROWN MILTON 0 MARINE M BY PACIFIC MOBILE 11600 SW 90TH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE TIGARD,OR 97223 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 1 S 135DD-03615 1 S 135D D-02001 BOUSE JOHN R BROW MILTON 0 11470 SW LOMITA BY PAC MOBILE TIGARD,OR 97223 ADMINI RATIVE OFFICE 2106 HOCO ST MIL AUKIE,OR 97222 • • 1S135DA-02701 1S135DD-03607 BROYLES JENNIE A FITZPATRICK DAVID G&BETTY L 11260 SW 90TH 7615 SW CHESTNUT STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-01600 1 S135DB-02603 CACH GERALD C AND JOAN L FORMAN MATTHEW B& 12525 SW MAIN KATHLEEN A TIGARD,OR 97223 11403 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-00100 1 S 135DA-02802 CHRISTIE LACEY TRUSTEE FREEDMAN STEPHEN H& 22020 SW AEBISHER RD ARCHER CANDACE SHERWOOD,OR 97140 11300 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DD-03603 1 S135DA-04200 COSHOW ELIZABETH I GHITA VASILE&DOMNICA 11425 SW LOMITA AVE 11310 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1 35DA-01000 1 S135DA-00500 DALTON DAVID L GRAHAM DON G AND 8530 SW PFAFFLE RD BROSSIA PAUL F TIGARD,OR 97223 11260 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-01200 1 S 135DD-03701 DAL c DAVID L GRIGG DOREEN E 8530 'f PFAFFLE RD 11700 SW 90TH AVE TIG-RD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-03200 1 S 135DB-02604 DOLL THOMAS C AND DORIS M HEITZ NANCY P AND RONALD L 11500 SW 90TH 11401 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DA-02803 1S135DD-03612 ELLIS DANIEL& HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B ARACO-ELLIS PATRICIA FLORENCE L 11290 SW 90TH AVE 9620 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 L 1 S 135DB-02602 1 S 135DD-03608 FAULK JEFF&DOROHTY M HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B&FLORENCE 11435 SW 90TH Go HERBERHOLZ LARRY TIGARD,OR 97223 9620 SW 90TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DC-08100 1 S 135DB-00400 FERRIER GERALD L&JOYCE H HOFFMAN MICHAEL J 11565 SW 90TH AVE 1223 NW 24TH#5 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97210 , • • 1 S 135DD-01601 1 S 135DD-03617 HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN&MARY P 12215 SW 33RD AVE 11410 SW LOMITA AVE PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-01300 1 S 135DD-03609 HOLM S AMUEL M/JANET M MACKINNON FERN E& 12215 33RD AVE DALE VIRGINIA E PO D,OR 97219 11625 SW LOMITA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03605 1 S 135DD-01201 HUGHES JEFFREY M&TAMI JO BARE MAINS ELDON H JR AND 11485 SW LOMITA AVE MAINS TODD K TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 1178 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 1S1 35DB-00600 1 S 136CC-00400 JACKSON LINDA J MCGUIRE ROBERT J& 11545 SW 90TH AVE MCGUIRE THOMAS P& TIGARD,OR 97223 MCGUIRE WILLIAM A 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-02900 1 S 135DD-03611 JUNG MARTIN MARIA MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R AND 11400 SW 90TH K YVONNE TIGARD,OR 97223 MCLOUGHLIN ROBERT C 5400 SW 198TH AVE ALOHA,OR 97007 1 S135DA-03800 1 S135DA-02801 KAULUWAI CORPORATION MCTAGGART BRENT 2445-A MAKIKI HEIGHTS DRIVE PO BOX 231207 HONOLULU,HI 96822 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135DA-01401 1 S 135D D-04400 KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC MIKE/KAY INVESTMENT LLC REAL ESTATE TAX COMPLIANCE C/O FIRST AMERICAN EXCHANGE CORP BEXAR SAVINGS TOWER 1700 SW FOURTH AVE#103 1777 NE LOOP 410#1250 PORTLAND,OR 97201 SAN ANTONIO,TX 78217 1 S135DA-01801 1 S 135DC-08200 L N PROPERTIES LLC MOLITOR LAWRENCE R/NANCY L 11481 SW HALL BLVD STE 100 11587 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1353•-03 40 1S135DD-03614 L N PR•"RTIES LLC NEBERT SUSAN ETTA&TOMMY HENRY 11481 n • L BLVD STE 100 11530 SW LOMITA TIG•'e,O- 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DA-04800 1 S 135DD-03613 LANDRISE DEVELOMENT LTD NEBERT TOMMY HENRY PO BOX 1212 SUSAN E LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 11530 SW LOMITA TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 1 S 135DA-01800 1S135DD-03619 NEDELISKY MICHAEL J QUILLEN DEANNA MARIE 25 82ND DR 11560 SW 90TH GLADSTONE,OR 97027 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DA-02702 1S135DD-01400 NESS DORIS A SAYLER ANNA R 11230 SW 90TH PO BOX 23757 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 1S135DD-03700 1S135DA-01100 • OH JANG W AND YON SOON SCHAEFFER DONALD M 11630 SW LOMITA MUNCH MICHAEL T TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 23697 TIGARD,OR 97281 1S135DA-01500 1 S 135DD-03616 OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION SCHROCK DONNA R RNV PROPERTY MANAGEMENT UNIT 11440 SW LOMITA 355 CAPITAL ST NE RM 411 TIGARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97301 1 S135DA-05000 1 S135DA-04300 OSEI-AGYEMANG SIMON SMITH SHARON LOU 8950 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11330 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DD-01800 1S135DA-03100 PANG KEIKO TR SNYDER WILLIAM T&STEPHANIE 46-442 HOLOLIO ST 11480 SW 90TH KANEOHE,HI 96744 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03703 1 S 135DD-01300 PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE STEELE NANCY TRUSTEE BY SUMMIT REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT PO BOX 230057 5320 SW MACADAM AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135D -03300 1S135DD-03301 PARKE J OME W TRUSTEE TIGARD PROPERTIES INC BY SUM T REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT BY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 5320 M CADAM AVE 2106 SE OCHOCO PORTLAND,OR 97201 MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 1 S135DD-05200 1 S135DB-12000 PATEL ASHOK A& VICE ALICIA K&RICHARD A PATEL SURYAKANT 11375 SW 90TH AVE 14850 NE SANDY TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97230 1 S135DB-02600 1 S 135DA-03000 POWLOSKI C KENT&LISA VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE 11405 SW 90TH ARVIDSON OVE S&DENISE L TIGARD,OR 97223 11405 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 1 S 135DD-03620 WANG PING-JUI KAI 22600 SW 93RD TER TUALATIN,OR 97062 1 S135DA-04900 WELLS WILLIAM& WELLS DENISE 8960 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DB-00500 WHITE BARBARA A 11495 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03602 WORSECH HAROLD A SANDRA K 11450 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 • • • Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 19-Jun-01 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 • •., • Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:07/30/2001 15:48 User:Phyllis Station: 03 Operator: PAH Rcpt No: 0008013 Date: 07/30/2001 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 33.00 Name: GEO STANDARDS Cash: 0.00 Address: SUITE 210 Check: 33.00 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD N/A 0.00 PORTLAND, OR 97229 Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount A/R PLG2001-00006 33.00 © j1=2)V • • MECIINIFIN JUL 3 0 2001 CITY OF IGARD O Setting the Standard for Service Excellence llMv llC Attn: Shirley Treat, Planning Division 13125'SW'Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 INVOICE NO: PLG2001-00006 503-639-4171 Fax 503-684-7297 DATE: July 18, 2001 To: Sam Adettiwar Ship To: Geo Standards Corp. 1225 NW Murray Blvd., Ste., 102 Portland, OR 97229 • Phone: Fax: ' , - _ - - STAFF PERSON P.O. NUMBER DATE SHIPPED SHIPPED VIA F.O.B. POINT TERMS Shirley Treat N/A N/A N/A N/A Upon receipt QUANTITY• DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE • AMOUNT • 2 sets Mailing labels PDR2001-00003 (Previous list outdated) $22.00 $22.00 (6:1-feetsq $2/sheet X 2 sets)' j Sketql CQ� ,f 1 Generate List $11.00 $11.00 (Please send the check to my attention so that I can place it in the appropriate account. Thank you) SUBTOTAL $33.00 SALES TAX SHIPPING & HANDLING TOTAL DUE $33.00 Make all checks payable to The City.of-Tigard Please include the "COPY" of the enclosed invoice,with payment to the attention of the person below: , _ If you have.any..questions-concerning this invoice, please call Shirley Treat at-the City of Tigard Community Development Department at 503-639-4171 x419. ' THANK YOU � i � I L GEO STANDARDS City of 7/23/2001 Date Type Reference Original mt. Balance Due Discount Payment O 6 07/18/200 Bill PLG2001-00006 33.00 33.00 33.00 Check Amount 33.00 Wells Fargo Bank Mailing Labels & Copies (Attn: Shirley Tr 33.00 • PD 12 c)-oo vzyz)v 3 • CITY of TIGARD � GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM - • AREA NOTIFIED • (S 00') ST 1311511082701 10110'400 .•,soiess 10 a •51110.. FOR: Sam Adettiwar I— 131350041134 CO W co 181350002701 •350005 I 0 ,q, 1:i_;;i 0 1313 ,0500 a 350002000 RE: 151 35DA, Tax Lots ""504041°° 1400 & 3503 ' 151900►02801 st 0,900 10. 131850004300 ,,500°28, finnoDtmoo- PFAFFLE W 1313500°15811 - - > 00 01800 pp 00 Q 131350002004 11860002809 181858002900, 50907 0131350007016 ;O1 1,1 50001 00 1S188DComoo :i1: Li Doi �� utaso4l"�Io Property owner information noon,110..0,t*�� 131a5p00AD n ,,13ias0eozeD2 "`?:V�`. is valid for 3 months from 5090800 ''►t�l ��+.`� 50003 \ \�` 13850001000 the date printed on this map. 131850800400 131350303100 ■*= '�, 4►Y '' 3013060 01 W 501101, 111,11 181350001500 . .•::::E13336110005111 13usDaoa2oo solo o utasa11o116DO uusamoo :�a SONS , 13lasoao14o1 ,�\� ,3500010 _ „0003,: 500081 131350003019 3500083 0 C 3500038,0 ,;,50003 151350001000 I :8500013' 0) 131350003000 D LOMITA ° 13011018 0 r � ,359080100 181350001000 181350003300 :.500020', 13u5DD, o. • Iii ■ 350003 13135o002DD1 uris000u 131 ;DD0 700 151350003708-. 36000590 ..1.150008 I 131350 0210, 1813500012' 1513500838 N ,,: 110 41 \ . 0 100 200 300 400 Feet • tll. W 151150001301 Q ■Q ,9 V=318 feet A City of Tigard I—NEM . ...,,,J.4,,,,„„ . tom■■J y.O , Information on this map is for lopme location s Di end (� should be verified with the Development Services Division. Z 4 tdr.41‘i m (�� 13125 Tigard,O Hell Blvd 1 503)OR 9171 <1 #I ��\ \ /ww 839-4171 `_ http:IM^�.ci.tigard.or.us . Community Development Plot date:Mar 5,2001;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR • C p3 . 1 o-F 5) • 1 S 135DA-05100 1 S 135DD-03618 2000-014 PARTITION PLAT BRADFORD GARY TR OWNERS OF LOTS 2-3 305 E FIFTH 2993 N CANYON RD THE DALLES,OR 97058 PROVO,UT 84604 1 S 136CC-00301 1S135DA-01400 • ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD#103 11515 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1 35DA-03300 35DA-03503 ANSARI BEHROOZ&SHEILA BRA PRE ANDA ASHRAMA 11540 SW 90TH AVE 11515 L BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 97 3 • . 1 S 1350D-03606 1 S 135DA-01600 APPLETON PROPERTIES INC BRAZIL CLARENCE E&MARY JEAN 7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 PO BOX 23064 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 1S1 35DD-03800 135DA-01700 BAUER LENA RICHARD T B NCE E&MARY JEAN BAUER RICHARD W PO 23 11734 SW 90TH ARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S1350D-03704 1S135DA-01900 BAXTER ALAN T AND SOOK HEE BROWN MARGARET ANN 11650 SW 90TH 19065 SW JOHNSON AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97006 1 S135DC-07900 135DA-02100 BELL LEO LAMAR TRUSTEE • BR• • M• ' ARET ANN 11635 SW 90TH 1906 :•I NSON AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 A •HA,OR 971.6 1 S 135DD-03604 1S135DD-02001 BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A BROWN MILTON 0 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE BY PACIFIC MOBILE TIGARD,OR 97223 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 1 S135DD-03600 135DD-02000 BERGMANN FLOYD H BR: N MILTON • MARINEM BY PA CM•=ILE 11600 SW 90TH ADMINIS '.'TIVE OFFICE TIGARD,OR 97223 210. : OCH• 0 ST LWAUKIE,OR • 222 1 S 135DD-03615 1 S 135DA-02701 BOUSE JOHN R BROYLES JENNIE A 11470 SW LOMITA 11260 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • , • • 1 S135DD-01600 1S135DB-02603 CACH GERALD C AND JOAN L FORMAN MATTHEW B& 12525 SW MAIN KATHLEEN A TIGARD,OR 97223 11403 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-00100 1S135DA-02802 CHRISTIE LACEY TRUSTEE FREEDMAN STEPHEN H& 22020 SW AEBISHER RD ARCHER CANDACE SHERWOOD,OR 97140 11300 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135D D-03603 1 S 135DA-04200 COSHOW ELIZABETH I GHITA VASILE&DOMNICA 11425 SW LOMITA AVE 11310 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-01200 1 S 135DA-00500 DALTON DAVID L GRAHAM DON G AND 8530 SW PFAFFLE RD BROSSIA PAUL F TIGARD,OR 97223 11260 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 135DA-01000 1S135DD-03701 DA N ID L GRIGG DOREEN E 8530 FFLE RD 11700 SW 90TH AVE ARD,OR 9 3 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-03200 1 S 135D B-02604 DOLL THOMAS C AND DORIS M HEITZ NANCY P AND RONALD L 11500 SW 90TH 11401 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 1 S 135DA-02803 1 S135DD-03612 ELLIS DANIEL& HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B ARACO-ELLIS PATRICIA FLORENCE L 11290 SW 90TH AVE 9620 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S135DB-02602 1S135DD-03608 FAULK JEFF&DOROHTY M HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B&FLORENCE 11435 SW 90TH Go HERBERHOLZ LARRY TIGARD,OR 97223 9620 SW 90TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DC-08100 1 S 135DB-00400 FERRIER GERALD L&JOYCE H HOFFMAN MICHAEL J 11565 SW 90TH AVE 1223 NW 24TH#5 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97210 1 S135DD-03607 1 S 135DA-01300 FITZPATRICK DAVID G&BETTY L HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M 7615 SW CHESTNUT STREET 12215 SW 33RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 • • 1 5DD-01601 1S135DD-03617 HOLM ` • • L M/JANET M LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN&MARY P 12215 ' 33-= •VE 11410 SW LOMITA AVE -•-TLAND,OR 9 '19 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03605 1 S 135DD-03609 HUGHES JEFFREY M&TAMI JO BARE MACKINNON FERN E& 11485 SW LOMITA AVE DALE VIRGINIA E TIGARD,OR 97223 11625 SW LOMITA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DB-00600 1 S135DD-01201 JACKSON LINDA J MAINS ELDON H JR AND 11545 SW 90TH AVE MAINS TODD K TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 1178 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 1 S 135DA-02900 1 S 136CC-00400 JUNG MARTIN MARIA MCGUIRE ROBERT J& 11400 SW 90TH MCGUIRE THOMAS P& • TIGARD,OR 97223 MCGUIRE WILLIAM A 8470.SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-03800 1 S 135DD-03611 KAULUWAI CORPORATION MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R AND 2445-A MAKIKI HEIGHTS DRIVE K YVONNE HONOLULU,HI 96822 MCLOUGHLIN ROBERT C 5400 SW 198TH AVE ALOHA,OR 97007 1 S 135DA-01401 151350A-02801 KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC MCTAGGART BRENT REAL ESTATE TAX COMPLIANCE PO BOX 231207 BEXAR SAVINGS TOWER TIGARD,OR 97281 1777 NE LOOP 410#1250 SAN ANTONIO,TX 78217 1 S 135DA-03500 1 S 135DD-04400 L N PROPERTIES LLC MIKE/KAY INVESTMENT LLC 11481 SW HALL BLVD STE 100 C/O FIRST AMERICAN EXCHANGE CORP TIGARD,OR 97223 1700 SW FOURTH AVE#103 PORTLAND,OR 97201 135DA-01801 1S135DC-08200 L N P RT LC MOLITOR LAWRENCE R/NANCY L 11481 A VD STE 100 11587 SW 90TH AVE RD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DA-04800 1 S135DD-03614 LANDRISE DEVELOMENT LTD NEBERT SUSAN ETTA&TOMMY HENRY PO BOX 1212 11530 SW LOMITA LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 DA-04900 1 S 135DD-03613 LANDRI MENT LTD NEBERT TOMMY HENRY PO B 12 SUSAN E KE OSWEGO,OR 97035 11530 SW LOMITA TIGARD,OR 97223 • • • 1 S135DA-01800 1S135DB-02600 NEDELISKY MICHAEL J POWLOSKI C KENT&LISA 25 82ND DR 11405 SW 90TH GLADSTONE,OR 97027 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-02702 1S135DD-03619 NESS HAROLD W DORIS A QUILLEN DEANNA MARIE 11230 SW 90TH 11560 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 / TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DA-02000 1 S 135D D-01400 OBIE MEDIA CORP ✓ SAYLER ANNA R 4211 W 11TH PO BOX 23757 EUGENE,OR 97402 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S135DD-03700 1 S 135DA-01100 OH JANG W AND YON SOON SCHAEFFER DONALD M 11630 SW LOMITA MUNCH MICHAEL T TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 23697' TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S135DA-01500 1 S135DD-03616 OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION SCHROCK DONNA R RNV PROPERTY MANAGEMENT UNIT 11440 SW LOMITA 355 CAPITAL ST NE RM 411 TIGARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97301 1 S 135DA-05000 is 135DA-04300 OSEI-AGYEMANG SIMON SMITH SHARON LOU 8950 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11330 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DD-01800 1 S 135DA-03100 PANG KEIKO TR SNYDER WILLIAM T&STEPHANIE 46-442 HOLOLIO ST 11480 SW 90TH KANEOHE, HI 96744 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DD-03300 1 S135DD-01300 PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE STEELE NANCY TRUSTEE BY SUMMIT REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT PO BOX 230057 5320 SW MACADAM AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97201 13500-03703 1 S 135DD-03301 PAR ' JEROM TRUSTEE TIGARD PROPERTIES INC BY SUMM •-• •L ESTATE MANAGEMENT BY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 5321 : MACAD• • •VE 2106 SE OCHOCO '+RTLAND,OR 97201 MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 1S135DD-05200 1 DD-02100 PATEL ASHOK A& TIGARb --OPER -SINC d/ PATEL SURYAKANT BY ADMINI • •• IVE OFFICE 14850 NE SANDY 2106 - •CHOCO PORTLAND,OR 97230 WAUKIE,OR 97222 • • 1 S 135DB-12000 VICE ALICIA K&RICHARD A 11375 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S-1350A-0300o VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE ARVIDSON OVE S&DENISE L 11405 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03620 WANG PING-JUI KAI 22600 SW 93RD TER TUALATIN,OR 97062 1 S 135D B-00500 WHITE BARBARA A 11495 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DD-03602 WORSECH HAROLD A SANDRA K 11450 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 • • • Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 29-Sept-00 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. 3 Tigard, OR 97224-3316 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 14th Avenue Tigard, OR 91223 Dieter Jacobs 1115 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 91223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 91223 Mar 06- 01 O9: 34a geostandards. com •000 0000000000 p. 1 /)eostandards Engineers raising the standards for consulting in gcosciences Principal Sam Adettiwar, MS,PE Engineering Consultants Dinesh Katti,PhD,PE Mel Blassy,PhD,PG Fred DeLeon,MS,PE,PG Fax Transmittal To: Pa..H---I- vl Number of Pages (Including cover page): 3 From: Man Si OD 34oS fWk7dQdS Date: 3/5/01 Time: 3 :30 A-0'1 Subject: in el, t,rz ii f Copies to: Message: eoid io ,a6a.4e p icA y .o (AID beg `tP'e . . g6 i'ke dav 1 y 7 Westlawn Professional Building, 1225 NW Murray Blvd.,Suite 102,Portland,OR 9722 Ph:503-646-9069 F : 503-646-8976 3215-C SE Mill Plain 8/No.561,Vancouver,WA 98684,Ph: 360-882-6618,Fx: 3637296-8367 www.geostandards.corn Mar 06 01 09: 34a geostandards. corn 00 00000000000 p. 2 -03/02/2001 18:50 FAX 50568472 City of Tigard 001 . Poat-tt-brandtaxtransmittalmem ,711461 pages / Ia. II F •an CITY Q� TIGARD imr COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ire �� ����� �Z a4 Fax to PLANNING DIVISION TTY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD (omrrrurrityfoprrrcrrt SaapingA Omer Community TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE; 503-639-4171 FAX 503-681-1291(Aare Petry or Shirley/Pinning) R[IIUET FOR 50ThFOOT PROPERTY OWNER. MAILING UST Property owner information is valid.for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP &TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 15134AB,Tax Lot 00100)OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARC LS BELOW and C DE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): 1 ' d 124" a 0 1,S1- 35t Pr ss - I l515 Svc * )- /,-L-1— 730 u1rGvA ,`T1G D 9 722-3 INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: fr s i i' I C IT }` (NOTE A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submi at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting,you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: . SAM ADE 7-T IV)4R PHONE: 5©3 -. G 4G'_9 1D09 This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing 1 t` pr cesstng your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost an not be pre-determined. _ PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY T 4 r ,f ‘, CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. - , r 1C 1 Cost Description: 1 U �) SI 1 to generate the marling list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet). ' w� X. �"�� Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. kA,.,( . IP *EXAMPLE* * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST F** F 4 sheets of labels x42/sheet = SP.OQ x.L.,sets = $16.00 heet(s)of labels a S2/sheet = $ 10 a sets = �D 1_sheets of labels x 52/sheet for(IT area x Z sets = S 4.00 sheet(s)of labels a$2/sheet to;CIT area = S x . sets = 4. GENERATE LIST= j 00 i_0 GENERATE LIST = SILO TOTAL = S1I.00 �"' TOTAL = _ $ a I !cowl 1 I co I I 1-- i , . — II CITY of TIGARD I i ? I i GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM N N N F I (I 1 1,---_____I 1 I g— 1 Z--,--..1 . 1 ! --- -I I VICINITY MAP r 6'4, -- _ ,______.__ — . i 1 I 1 NN I i ,1-- 1 I l 1 1 spi> . r-------------i i___ L________ I • 1 • , I . A CUP I 999-00001 .: . o 1 1 I 1 1 I __________F , , -..-- I--1• PDRI999-00002 0 :-----H H 1i , I I- I O I r -1 L 1 li i li i I i__ ________L. L____ __ _ i 1-- 1 VAR1999-00024 . N i.I 1 L i MI51999-00026 o ; ST o I • I ___ T____________, O I 1- ic—) I ' \ ' 1 ! I L---- ---1 , I 1 Ifr-rij-------------1 . " 2* [ -(PH - I I\ 1: SWAMI VISWA \ I 61 I- ( TEMPLE EXPANSION ow ^T; \ iJ , 0 i . . 1 . (i) , 1 .- 2 SUBJECT I . _ \I J -..j .11 I - •--L....... TAX LOTS 2 I 1 I ' \N' PIAEFLE ? -• 1 1 , [1 T-1 . —11 I il 1 1 ' ______ 1 ■ ks.\\\‘,114111111111W 0 f . r' 1 1 ) , h t ‘ I I I I I o . I • w In . [ . . . L i 13 ri It 1Z• !I ett\NkNi 'i I \ • 1 ., ., 1-- ' II F-.I 1 ; 1 • 4)t)41,N iNN ,17)(1) , 81 i I 1 1 1 a / L ____J 1 1 1 AD ; 1 i LOMITA i 1 F___H ,.,, , \ 1 . N 1 i , / I —1 ' i 1 , _r. s . --\,, :.\\ 0 2:303...:0400 Feet I \ \ ' \ \ cf) / 1 H I, \ •. — I . 1 , \ 0 . i 1 City of Tigard ,--1 • i I P \ \ . W ---/ --I--- 1 co I • \T .-.\ ,---\ \-574\ Information on this map,for 9eneret Vocation only and Should be verified with the Development Services Division. CO • - t : i---- . irl . , 0\ , \ C r------- 13125 SW Hall Blvd 1 F----i I \ \ ---\\ : Tigard,OR 97223 L -"" / \ / 1 / /\\ \ ,/'„ (593)639-4171 n) • - I FT < \ i 1 1"------/ \ \ ,------' CP\ . \ .„:-_< ---, \ ...._ . \ 1 http://www.ci tigerd.er.us , E —Community Development Plot date:Sep 21, 1999;CAmagic\MAGIC03.APR m r o no H c m m :12 R 3 "' 0 - 7 N a m m O D z z N "4 a 0 H.1-. m ' � _DX °0 0CD 0 D X 0 (/) '' O CD ID _ - -- - - - - - ---- - - 0O N m WILL CALL/PICCP �-� o I Fill out this form completely and attached it securely CD to the document(s). Bring it to the WILL CALL/ PICK 0 ■ UP area at the Front Counter and file in the y appropriate phabetical slot by last name/company. D' TO: . ir (lid/its/am) .., 0 COMPANY NAME: o W 4t so DOCUMEN NAME: /9352)/47/4d 672 F _ N cu o c N FRO ft N D o c ° o •/ / _ o 0 DEPARTMENT: , 8 • a , N o CD D O o DATE TO WILL CALL: J/ i c o ; p CD FEE: J� ��• i"L�GG�J�%�' - 0 00 If the docume t is not picked up within 5 working o 0 days of the "DATE TO WILL CALL", the document o CO will be returned to the originator. o RETURNED TO ORIGINATOR DATE: .— — — ' 0 -i a r D 3 O C z -4 12 a P 3 3 O 0 c c b c O oo G O Yo�l!i CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 11/14/2001 FILE NOS.: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 2001-00003 MINOR MODIFICATION (MMD) 2001-00010 FILE TITLE: BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM & TEMPLE APPLICANT: Alpha Engineering, Inc. OWNERS: Brahma Premananda Ashram Shelley Holly, Project Planner Attn: Sam Additiwar 9600 SW Oak Street, Suite 230 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 (508)46a--$003 REQUEST: A request for approval to modify the previous approval for development of a 4,840 square foot Ashram building (residential dormitory for Monks) and a 9,000 square foot Temple. Although the Ashram building proposal has not changed from the previous approval, the design and location of the Temple building have changed, thus requiring a new Planned Development Review and a Minor Modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit. LOCATION: 11515 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. The project is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard, north of SW Pacific Highway. COMP. PLAN/ ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial 'District. The C-P zoning district is. designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ❑ TYPE II ® TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: JULY 19, 2001 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: AUGUST 2, 2001 ['HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: AUGUST 20, 2001 TIME: 7:30 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ❑STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN ® UTILITY PLANS ® SITE PLAN ® ARCHITECTURAL PLAN ® TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ® NARRATIVE ® CIVIL CALCULATIONS ® OTHER: MISC. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby; Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 388 . ' . PLANNED DEVELOPMENT _14 Ail TYPE III APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE APP.HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): I I S I S sW H /� L $ L.�I.D TI&�D ©p °J722g FOR STAFF USE ONLY " nj 4. Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): { 91 S5 DA , TA1X L j TS 140 a 4 5O -Other:Case No:(s) r Site Size: 2' 2.5 A C..lQJ S Receipt NO.:?-704 :=/'7.0 A AA .Application ca pted By :( k Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: 5 WV I V LCOrPts0Mti Numin g e j t" ; Date F0( -gr Address: I►SI S S W ) 4U_ Phone:Sa3-5 1 Q'g°73 City: T I q Zip: r72 Date Determined Complete l ,i Applicant*: P Rev 11/15/2000; ,,i t curprnlmasterslrevisedlpdadock. Address: Phone: City: Zip: REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will net be accepted • *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant without the required submittal elements) must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written implication Form authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space �,/� provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with L�J Owner's Signature/Written Authorization this application. ETitle Transfer Instrument or Deed gr Copy of Pre-Application Conf. Notes PROPOSAL SUMMARY EVSite/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) The owners of record of the subject property request permission to KSite/Plot Plan (reduced 81/2"x 11") create a Planned Development consisting of(please be specific): Applicant's Statement P 1- A5 CT s a G / T T-Q �� ( D (#of copies based on pre-app check list) K /�►T ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card y� J 6 A■y i�^-r�..,.Iv r (Distributed/completed at application submittal) f a�d [�USA Service Provider Letter PrP P L1 C40 T s j7- Tlr_rvvc.4-J 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property Owner List Generated by the City 4 Neighbo g7Affidavits-&-Notes © �Filin ee (Detailed) $Applicabe SDR fee.) (Conceptual) $2,170.00 Urban: See Wa. Co. Fee Schedule 1 • • • List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: V""2A AN GC- ac. C v r ii/ts k-k4Ni 'Pfzov , This s / 'PL wric, N An/ 1'}a)'v1 cl To 13.a- svgM9TTE am)6.- -re) iv) r r to Iz Lrr /rte c - i s -rep u I ts1 G- APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) J THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. FATED this I 9 41.1 day of A-P P L ,2001 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature S'A) 11 t'i/ I.sA)4 %2fZ;-MA/v1ADP Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 Receipt #: 27200100000000001709 T I D E M R K Date: 04/24/2001 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due MMD2001-00010 [MISC]Misc Fee 100-0000-451000 $20.00 PDR2001-00003 [LANDUS]Pln Detail Plan Rev 100-0000-438000 $1,600.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check SUDHIR ADETTIWAR 0 1143 $1,620.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $1,620.00 • 0 MINOR MODIFICATION AM,,"''AQ;,1 TYPE I APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125--SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address/Location(s): 11 515 S vV H 41,1— 61'V11, 1 l g 6 2 722-,3 : FOR STAFF USE ONLY . Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): I9f35iA , X LOTS t460 L 3503 CaseNo.(s):° �`Z j oo© tom Site Size: Other CaseNo.(s): .. D:2 Z.or,i dob 3 Applicant*: Sv■/ I ` nS vA-t1�(1 A Nel-N9>/+' Receip No : 2-c0 j _ f v Address: I I S 15— S VV hf IA. �LV� .1. licatiori Acc to B City/State: 15 zip: 9 7 2 23 ARp. _.. p y' .....: .: Primary Contact: ,9. A-M t T T I t ,f(Z Pate:. ... . ...4/L 6/. : Phone: 50 3— (o 4 Co�-9 O G3 Fax 503—6 t��o—g`�Z(�, Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: (Attach list if more than one) Date Determined°Complete: Rev.3/5/2001. s�curpinlmsteVeViedinonnod_mst S^ •^a As eU �� : a m Addr ess: Phone: City/State: Zip: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) (Note: applications will not be accepted must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this without the required submittal elements) form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY Application Form The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a � / Minor Modification. To review a modification as a Minor I Owner's Signature/Written Authorization Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion does not Title Transfer Instrument or Deed invoke one or more of the 11 criteria discussed within Section 18.120.070(B) of the Tigard Development Code. If the modification Site Development Plan (3 copies) exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the following criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major []Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") Modifications are processed in the same manner as a new Site Development Review. In a separate letter, please address the "Applicant's Statement(3 copies) criteria below contained in Section 18.360.050(B) including a detailed (Addressing Criteria Under Section 18.360.050(B) response to each criteria. [v]� Filing Fee (City) $100.00 I. An Increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. (Urban) $236.00 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s)by more than 20%. In addition, the Director must find that the 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be proposed change complies with the underlying affected. standards of the applicable zoning district. To 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to exceed 100 complete this review, the Applicant's proposal vehides per day. must include a discussion indicating how the 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10% exduding site expansion will continue to comply with the expansions under 5,000 square feet minimum setback, building height, parking land 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the landscaping standards. Other applicable open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more requirements such as minimum Clear Vision than ten percent. areas near driveways and street intersections 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or, landscaping provisions) may also be applicable depending on where below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan. the building expansion is proposed to be 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not constructed on the site. the subject of Criteria I through 10 above. • • APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. ' DATED this I c3 4h day of L. ,20©I 1 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature �l. (ThI1/L- 7Jit [7)j DY)A-NAMDo Owner's Signature Owner's Signature • • Page 1 of 1 FYI---Shelly w/Alpha Engineering and I spoke today regarding fees for the above reference project. They are as follows: Approval Extension for original CUP1999 will be $ 150.00 Planned Developmentwill be $2,170 for PD and $20.00 for Minor Modification (20%of required fee of$100.00) Thanks, Di Diane Parke Permit Technician Planning/Engineering City of Tigard Community Development dianepaci.tigard.or.us file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GW}00006.HTM 06/05/2001 • July 17, 2001 &Aulp!Illfi 0( Alpha Engineering, Inc. CITY OF TIGARD 9600 SW Oak, Suite 230 OREGON Portland, OR 97223 Attn. Shelley Holly RE: Brahmapremananda Ashram and Temple PDR 2001-00003, MMD 2001-00010 Completeness Letter Ms. Holly, The City of Tigard received additional application materials for the Brahmapremananda Ashram and Temple on July 13, 2001. The development site is located at 1S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. This letter is to inform you that the application is complete. A public hearing before the Tigard Planning Commission will be scheduled regarding this application within 6 to 8 weeks. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171, x407. Sincerely, Kevin Young Associate Planner cc: Land Use Casefile No. PDR 2001-00003 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard; OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 ALPHA ENGINEERING, 1 . IM4'V'[•O �'RAC�]@[NO`t�11�L�d Engineering • Development Services • urveying 9600 S.W. OAK STREET SUITE 230 PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 RECEIVED PLA. �' _ JOB NO. G7 lc7-o 3• (503) 4 2-8003 FAX (503) 452-8043 ATTENTION JUL 10 200+ �i '� " n ` TO e l in RE: '_,t_iv . ■ CITY OF Cv- &("" *0 ikt-,r- _ F. I 4 .. E.11 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via 0 Fax 0 Messenger 0 Mail the following items: > ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. �� �/� DESCRIPTION 2 V 1 PV'l ' < Z 11,17 co k7 Jill us .i, RECEIVED PLANNING . JUL 10 2001 CMCOF TIGARD THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS IZO_,)1 P#�0 r: . �`. 0 � a t• ': i - FA L . 1-0 CADIt f (-e>4-ert ens , .0 A 1 ; ., Q.- 1 . . . d ta 0 , ` `r� /fie, VI A COPY TO / SIGNED: // / ?....-../ -/ -N ..1...... _ if enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. 4 iii ALPHA ENGINEERING, • o A 1tuL\[L Engineering • Development Services Nitrveying 9600 S.W. OAK STREET SUITE 230 PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 DATE (50 3) 452-8003 FAX (503) 452-8043 ATTENT62 1 r240 JOB NOsto^st.7 TO r'a yatoGt R rimpo A [MM r c* PLe r,i ES S crry 0 WE ARE SENDING YOU X Attached ❑ Under separate cover via Fax 0 Messenger 0 Mail the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION AktiVALS, OF tX ,To 114C0141 mss L 2 (ttt May lb, Zetr THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: XFor approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS RECEIVED COMMUNITY _ . ... COPY TO �__w��'7 C W SIGNED: o.�c�w.`�' (//�(/,� If enclosures are not as noted,kindly noti us at once. • • May 18, 2001 4/'/1/ \ Geostandards Corporation 1225 NW Murray Blvd., Suite 102 CITY OF TIGARD Portland, OR 97229 OREGON Attn. Sam Adettiwar RE: Brahmapremananda Ashram and Temple MMD 2001-00010, PDR 2001-00003 Incompleteness Letter Dear Mr. Adettiwar, The City of Tigard received your application submittal for a Planned Development and Minor Modification to a Conditional Use Permit on April 24, 2001. The development site is located at 1 S135DA, Tax Lots 1400 and 3503. This letter is to inform you that additional materials will be needed in order to deem your application complete. The necessary materials are as follows: Materials Needed by Planning Staff: • In conjunction with the Planned Development Concept and Detail plan application, an application to add a PD overlay zone to the base C-P zoning of the subject property is required. The appropriate application for this process is a zone change application. This type of zone change would be considered a Quasi-Judicial Amendment and could be considered concurrently with the planned development and minor modification applications. A zone change application and fee schedule is enclosed with this letter. Please submit a completed application; along with all necessary materials, as indicated on the application form; and the fee of$301, which is 20% of the $1,505 stand-alone fee for a zone change. The need for a zone change was inadvertently missed during the prior approval process for the proposed development. • Although a prior approval was received at this location for a similar facility, the development must be considered as a new proposal. Therefore, please provide information and plan materials for the work to be done on the ashram component of the facility as well as the temple. This should include details of use, square footage, and building elevations. If these components are identical to those proposed previously, copies of those materials may be submitted. 13125-SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 • • • A more detailed narrative is necessary to accompany the application materials. The submitted narrative addresses only the criteria for a minor modification to a Site Development Review. The narrative should address the criteria for a minor modification to a Conditional Use Permit (see Section 18.330.020). In addition, ALL relevant criteria relating to the Planned Development, Zone Change, and other applicable criteria must be addressed. Page 7 of the notes from our 3/13/01 pre-application conference indicates the applicable code criteria for your proposed development. • Your submittal materials must also include an impact study, as described in Section 18.390. Please contact me if you would like a sample impact study. • Submitted plans should include calculations of the amount of landscaped area and the amount of impervious surface that will result on the site from your proposed development. • The drawings provided were not accurately scaled. Because the plan sheets are 11" X 17" it is difficult to read many of the notes. For the ease of Planning Commission review, it is recommended that full-size plans be provided. The plans should be accurately scaled. • If off-site parking spaces are to be counted towards the required parking for the facility, submitted plans should show the location, number, and dimensions of the off-site parking spaces. • A lighting plan is needed which shows how the site will be lighted and which type of fixtures will be used. It will be important not to create glare on adjacent properties, particularly residential properties. • A tree survey and tree preservation plan is required to satisfy the requirements of Chapter 18.790. The tree survey should show all trees on the site that are 6 inches in caliper size or larger, and the plan should indicate if trees will be removed, and if so, what type of mitigation is proposed. • Please clarify which tax lots are included on the development site. The information provided on the application form and on the submitted plans is in conflict. • The submitted plans should show the location of the property line(s) which divide the development site. For the purposes of completeness review, please submit only 3 copies of the needed materials. If the submitted materials are adequate, I will contact you promptly and ask you to submit the remaining number of copies needed. Engineering staff have not yet • • had the opportunity to review your submittal. It is possible that they may require additional materials for their review. If this is the case, I will let you know by Wednesday, May 23`d. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171, x407. Sincerely, Kevin Young Associate Planner cc: Land Use Casefile No. PDR 2001-00003 Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer I:\CURPLN\Kevin\Subdivision\PDR01-3.inc (Swami Viswa).doc • • • 40411 �'\ A(14' � ►a SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENCE Facsimile To: Sam f C e ;Wave' Company: Phone: Fax: From: � uvn _ Company: City of Tigard Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Date: 5-f�$l0 Pages including this page: 1L COMMENTS: L e '/kyles S �t°�'f e w ✓' Sv--Gt �/t' -rte � City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 ** PLEASE DELIVER THIS FAX IMMEDIATELY ** Project: 1110,7c,./ V (5�T LAND USE APPLIC "ION Date: o COMPLETENESS REVIEW ❑ COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE STA RD INFORMATION: 2Sed/Title/Proof Of Ownership Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees ❑ Impact Study (18.390) PA Service Provider Letter Construction Cost Estimate 0 # Sets Of Application Materials/Plans re-Application Conference Notes Envelopes With Postage (Verify Count) 30 ce t Js f lnLi1 Sur PR CT STATISTICS: {oLA i° w���" riding Footprint Size D %Of Landscaping On Site g % Of Building Impervious Surface On Site lot e Square Footage g NS DIMENSIONED: Building Footprint. .eale tn,ot arking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking) _1,CA ruck Loading Space Where Applicable Building Height .. l'a \ Access Approach And Aisle [u� Visual Clearance Triangle Shown DI If 1. PLANS: A • inity Map .rchitectural Plan (j Tree Inventory 'sting Conditions Plan M Landscape Plan Site Plan ❑ Lighting Plan -_ TREE PLAN/MITIGATION PLAN: • Tex Itt 475 ❑ ❑ Act/ Q7 anal/O("ePtr 0 El ADDITIONAL REPO;TS: (list a sp� ial rep,� ) , f- rf . 61` -- e ipre k° S . ❑ . ,alj,_...., I , ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 1 8.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ❑ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.105(Access/Egress/Grculation) ❑ 18.180(Signs) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 1 8.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.310 Dariances/Adiustments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ❑ 18.790(Tree Removal) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.195(Visual aearance Areas) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 1 8.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 1 8.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) ❑ 1 8.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) • ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 18.198(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.410(lot tine Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.145(landscaping&Saeening Standards)❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.150(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 1 nG i e.❑ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling storage) w❑ 1 8.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.160 onconfornsing Situations `/ ADDITIONAL ITEMS: (GcuY izto�`'� ll "°L-Situations), 0 5 r.et/ Q l$, / c • rG' ' L, L E 6e 'It./ ,.....i.i ...,,, .. .. .1 EF/: , 'in.,, ce t/ - -., 51, 1 / I:\curpin\rnasters\revised\Iand use application comp- eness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 TITLE TRANSFER INSTRUMENT OR DEED • " 05-'0?--100G 10:5G 101•401, rAt4f:11-R>< Ur 433 *44** 0250530G r.02 •••• •:,•,- ...-?.,i- •..: -•::•!. .-•--; .• ••• •••:.4••••!f: -;: ::• -•*'-ie. '- *: •••:. • •• -- as.' ' ••••• • -- ...- "• ■. : - • • „...../ 1 %,- _.,...re„e t • ......---r--------. ..,...,".-.,.--... • ..---,v,-.,:-Tpt-s.,:k .. -: , STATE OF OREOON if u ...4... . :- g County of Washingtan leA t'•- ,. 1.J•cry :. 4..1,5,77": . .. of its:= .ie)...3:"I .; In meat • r---.;-: • ••1111_,,•''...11.. . • , cietx tot PT.. .."/TI:"?...."•"qek • that • -3C....... •-'• gni pb.m........51.ro....''..t. - .-s----- •- - Pli• " ' '4.-40 '...:.1.2.4.,.. 4, .• • • - -. - .: aitd -. •• . - .:.••la.-e*. •."70 , slid ..i.:.• -r: .., county * 'r4 . Z.,.7-L:•1Piglell. !...7. •,'. :-..- Atli,•ip MEM 1.4'....:. ...... . ••'..-. \ • Ii` • ...*. g-- -,-• ..p::..:.•,-,,,,:2• !I..:- - -•. • :. i •... ,. • 1....:::: : :-.- •( , . . .,•. -e■ -t-•. . Ex I -. • . 1...::.s• :.': ''. ...: f I -...i-i. *.! Doc : 95001169 : P. -;.• ......: ',..• .! 4 . Rect: 1.36198 251.00 !- -; . 01/03/1993 OZ:37:09Pfi .. • ••1. ".: 4.': i... ,:•• •,.• . • - . t-'i.:..i f.;■. . I t; i.• • --.:-Si ir : • • : ....,..".4 ••-• .. I • ,•-.P.':-, 6. .. . .f. . . 1. •,.; .• .. ..-'.....• .•!: : :•il, "t . :.•tc,.•;* ''' • • — :• . .. ■''ii..:' •9 Cs E_Q_-.zzi ...-. 1 141,' : ; • :,vi:;.,,,,,•.., ZIN)-.i .0c-\NiN p. -• f• ; ...1 . • :";,- • • . S ,■?...E.!..\p.t,j As t,o3N ; . . , ..4 !•,-' ..1 1 .. 11-1Q•Ph $0 0....z v.\ . •,*• • *Ail . . .,. - :‘,..2,t 7 . • ..•,c4 ,I , .:. ;.• •: , -r - - .. . . •!: . ; -r i.,.• I•• - -... . • • y: f‘:: • ; Ir4 • , 1 .4 ' .: -; 4-.. 0:. ' t 1 4 7.: . ... ..— • :s . . • .,-,14 1 ,: • , ..!.. •,.., ;1,i(' • ,..:r.. .S..... ' .,•:.i.i, . [ * \- 1-\ .-..• ...- ,. • :-. :.•:. ';`):;;Ii.in 1.-77":.;:-.•.:....,:.•-'.....-••-:-.-1.• .. -- ---.:*------7 - • - .. ' . •: .-'•"--'• : • .1.-11 7?..n,•• ?...1.......k:' ,.•::.?:,•:-:•..•;:•.:. ..1.•:..,••.:*:.•. : . . -.: •• • • 1.-.. . - • - - • . " ...."- • . • .. • :'..••'''... •''' ' ‘,•^17.,X,-. , i, I,•1;■••.t4t".11t4-1105-`,...,:-::::1;•'4,..;; ;;•::::•"••-• • . • . . - :-... •.• .• -... , .i*: -::!. .-.•:-.'."-..-- • •: • : '• .... •••*. , •:..*::';'...:*•-,-.-±....•-::::.:....-..:::f.,-.•:,‘ ,.,.., kfA.-.1. ... 7:4 f 17i. 2tr..-e...,.::..:ficz•;::;:.*v.,•,.,,•..),4.;---::",...• • •-:. • .;-... • . -*:.:.:;.•4 th2-s .:c":-1; ;'.-111 -'",t'--i;-41..i'-,-..iz.,•-,..'. - ..- ;- .......•: . • • -. .-.::::.:. ::. ...--. -. -.. . A,I.,-..1.-...,....1.1,-...1,..,,::-... .:.• • ,• - . . •. •... - . ...•..::.:.:-.....:-. • .- • .*:.::. ..::.!::...., '' '..1..-::;:i..%:4Ziz.:.._,..y. t,PP....,,,;.•.1.:. 3. • • '••••••• -:••,:-...--.••• *-*--'•f•:•.:::.;2:, .---;c:(.1}.,.2u-74.f i t"--• ',- 'Apr"! oor• •,.•. • • . . •.........•• . . . . ...*-'.• •.;N, ..,•.. ..?..':'..:;:f.;:.1:. !';''..t:.:7C.;::..... .....r:.. •• ':.' •• .• • .. :. .:.."::::: ••.. .; -:..• 4.37, . . . . .,. ....,:::::..,.. ..:......,.....,.......: :„5.40,. .....v,,t. .1.:::....... .., . ... .:..........„.......„..... . " .....:„.,....I....:...3.,144...14;, _ 05/07.'109G 1©:. s.ioioi. PRHHAF AX Uf 400 **** • 0250530G r.©:; • 1 STElWART 'TITLE COMPANY N0. t�D [Q �1([ " '� 6�0 RETURN DOCUMENT TO DESIGNEE BELOW !'VVTEWA RT TITLE �i ON AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE, ALL VOTURB TAX STATEMENTS SHALL BE BENT TOt BRAHMA PR MA p� ASHRAM BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM diYli/e • / f / ?4LA/ // iel./�f/ 11515 Sig BALL BLVD. a ail HALL BLVD. E/ TIOARP OR 97223 11515 Tigard, Oregon 97223 TAX ACCOUNT NO. : 181 3SDA 01400 n ail STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED II DAVID W. HUGHES and WOODROW W. HUGHES and WILLIAM BLUE, Grantor, conveys and warrants to BRAHMA PREPANANDA ASHRAM, a non-profit urganization, grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein situated in WASHINGTON County, Oregon, to-wit: SEE EXHIBIT "A' ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. :4t The said property is free from encumbrances except: Rights of '. th'e public in and to any portion of the herein described premises ,t ; lying within the boundaries of roads or highways; Easements, A;" ;.t restrictions, reservations, covenants, conditions and provisions t of record. Proposed roadway as delineated on the Washington 6' l _ County Tax Assessor Map; Encroachment ae disclosed un deed t recorded 03/09/1988 as Fee No.' 88-9617. . l� THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT •i. ALLOW USE or. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED TN < .. THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND •-Y, : REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE 't PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE ' � APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY '': y APPROvrr USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST • i. FARMTNC OR FOREST PRACTICtES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. I The true consideration for this conveyance is $208,000.00. Dated this e/i!t day of December, 1994. .AVID W. r. ...� �_ O C i i/ • . �` I. JAMES WOO.ROW W. H• 1 (1/ ...,) / / 'gl6 - - I WILLIAM BLUE <' � .. WASNINfiINg COUNT"' Irt AL p,tptPCl�rr 7R,& Ff R TIX STATF. AF OREGON s' 1— 4.- 211.(2 — �'J��S 1.!• COUNTY OF WASHINGTON 1, . Fi P�tU -11 :: . Deceml r61/1 1994 '. L'ersona ly appeared the above named DAVID W. HUGHES, WILLIAM . BLUE and WOODROw W. HUGHES and acknowledged the foregoing 'i1; instrument to be their voluntary A . luntar act a d decd. "' i'�+ c,rrtcte.� 64.1. ?, Note: Public for '.,'I r NfllAf�r^'.fit1.:r.•;.' ; N OREGON r Cc's' '^'`:�"' My �xpices 2/23/48 :: M commission U'GAt1M1SSlt: :• ' . f. r. t:• ©�•'©?.•1'73G 1©:i ,�„0„�„�, rAHArAx ur 400 ,I„1�,i„ • ©2 05 JG r.D4 • Order No. 94090402-W • EXHIBIT "A” PARCEL I: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot 23, Block "0", METZGER ACRE TRACTS, as shown by the duly recorded plat thereof, in the County of Washington, State of Oregon; thence Westerly along the South line of said lot 300 feet, more or less, to the Southwest • corner of said lot; thence North along the west line of said Lot 23, 75 feet, more or less; thence Easterly and parallel with the South line of said lot, 300 feet more or- less; thence South . and along the East line of said Lut .23, 75 feet; m1;.re or less, to the place of beginning. EXCEPTING' THEREFROM a parcel of land located in the Northeast one-quarter of the Southeast one-quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State • of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found 2 inch iron pipe at the Southeast corner of the David C. Graham Donation Land claim No. 52, said point also being the initial point' of GRAHAM ACRES; thence tracing the West line of the Thomas Stott Donation Land Claim No. 53, South 1' 46' 47" West 829 .76 feet to a point on the South line of Lot 23, METZGER ACRE TRACTS; thence tracing said South line East 282.60 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron pipe 30 feet, more or less, West of .the centerline of Hall Boulevard County Road No. 947) and the true point of beginning of this description; thence South 65.08 feet; thence South 89' 11' 11” West 291.77 feet to a point on the monumented West line of METZGER ACRES TRACTS thence North 1' 01' 00" East 108.05 feet; thence North 89 11' 11" East 289.85 feet to a point 30 feet, more or less, West of the centerline of said Hall Boulevard; thence South 42.93 feet to the true point of beginning of this description. PARCEL II: part of the Southeast quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of . Washington and State of Oregon, and described as follows: Beginning at an iron pipe which is North 2' 03' East 499.27 feet • from the Southwest corner of the Stott Donation Land Claim; thence from said iron pipe and true point of beginning North 88' 00' West 209.78 feet to an iron pipe on the Easterly line of a - -- proposed roadway; thence continuing -North -lie UU' West 25.U-feet to an iron pipe; thence North 2' 55' East 186.0 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 8E' 00 ' past 25.0 feet to an iron pipe on the Easterly line of the aforesaid road area; thence continuing South 88. 00' East 206.88 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 2 03 ' West 186.8 feet to the point of beginning. . ,(:/'(,�i' �/ Continued on next page `J -- - •. .. • ... .. . .. . . . ..._.... . ,-.. -._. :.:.. d:.ta ?. 05.'O?•'19JG 101 'i<*>i°i< r ANArA>{ ur 400 >i<>i.>i.* • 0250530G r.05 • Order No 94090402-W %f _ PARCEL III: , The South one half of the following described tract, in Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Heridian , in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, deeoribed 'as ' follows: Beginning at an iron pipe whioh is North 2' 03' East 686.07 feet w. from the Southwest corner of the Thomas A. Stott Donation Land ''# Claim; thence from said iron pipe and true point of beginning; ' thence North 88' 00' West 206.88 feet to an iron pipe on the ; Easterly line of a proposed roadway; thence contini�ing •North 88. ':'w 00' West 25.0 feet to an iron pipe; .thence North 2 55' East 189.25 foot to an iron pipe; thence 'South 88' 00' East 25.0 feet • to an iron pipe on the Easterly line of aforesaid road area; thence continuing South 88' 00' East 203.96 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 2' 03' West 189.25 feet to the point of • beginning. ,J. /V 4010,_041,1 • JUL-25-1997 17:07 �ANSNATION TITLE • TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY • 111 S.W. 5th Ave Ste 2200 Portland_ Oregon 97204-1752 (503) 222-9931 FAX (503) 228-4276 U.S. Bank Tower Attn: JEFF STEPHEN 111 S.W. 5th Ste 2200 Portland, OR 97204 2cc 02-41-02 2nd AMENDED PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT Dated July 25. 1997 Parties : NEDELISKY, Michael J Escrow Officer: Sandra Rogers BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM Escrow Number : W169990T Prop. Add: Title Officer : Jeff Steffen Title Number : Ref. No. A consolidated statement of all charges, credits, and advances, if any, in connection with this order will be provided at closing. Effective April 1. 1997 at 8:00 A.M . title to the land described herein is vested in: BRAHMAPREMANANDA ASHRAMA, an Oregon non profit corporation, who acugired title as BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM • • JUL-25-1997 17:07 •AN8NRT1ONI1IL _ • cD❑ r4 r4 I-. i13 DESCRIPTION: AMENDED LEGAL DESCRIPTION A non exclusive easement for access, egress, utilities and services over the following: • A portion of that tract of land described as Parcels I. II and III in Deed recorded January 5, 1995, as Recorder's Fee No. 95001169, Records of Washington County, Oregon, situated in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Thomas A. Stott Donation Land Claim No_ 53; thence North 2°03'00" East, a distance of 780.39 feet to the Southeast corner of said tract described in Deed recorded as Recorder's Fee No. 95055808 and the point of beginning; thence along the East line of the tract described as Parcel II and 111 in.said Deed recorded as Recorder's Fee No. 95001169 South 2°03'00" West a distance of 110.23 feet to the North line of the tract described as Parcel I, in said Deed; thence along said North line South 89°03'OS" East, a distance of 287.47 feet to the West line of the SW Hall Boulevard (County Road No. 947); thence along said right of way line South 0°56'55" West, a distance of 32.07 feet to the South line of said Parcel I; thence along said South line North 89°51'54" West, a distance of 338.23 feet; thence on a line that is parallel with and.50.00 feet distant to the East line of said Parcels II and III, North 02°03'00" East. a distance of 148.07 feet to the South line of said tract described in Deed recorded as Recorder's Fee No. 95055808; thence along said South.line South 87°57'01" East, a distance of 50.00 feet to the point of beginning. July 25. 1997 2 JUL-25-1997 17:07 4iiHNSNHI1UN liILt •. = __ • We are prepared to issue title insurance in the form and amount shown above subject to the usual printed conditions, stipulations and exclusions from coverage appearing in such policy form and to exceptions as shown herein. This report is preliminary to the issuance of a policy of title insurance and shall become null and void unless a policy is issued, and the full premium therefore paid. EXCEPTIONS: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public record; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments. or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. Easements. or claims of easement. not shown by the public records, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof, water rights. claims or title to water. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished. imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Discrepancies. conflicts in boundary lines_ shortage in area. encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. 6. 1997-98 taxes. a lien in an amount to be determined, but not yet payable. 7. Taxes. including current year. have been assessed with an exemption. If the exempt status is terminated under the statute prior to the date on which the assessment roll becomes the tax roll in the year in which said taxes were assessed, an additional tax may be levied. Exemption : Church Ownership (50%) Account No. : 151 35DA 01400 2050600 Affects additional property. 8. City liens , if any, of the City of Tigard. (An inquiry has been sent concerning the status of liens and a report will follow if any liens are found. ) 9. Regulations, including the power to acquire rights of ways and easements, and to levy assessments of the Unified Sewerage Agency. 10. Regulations including the power to acquire rights of ways and easements. of the Tualatin Valley Water District. . 11. Encroachment as disclosed in Deeds. Recorded : March 9. 1988 Recorder's Fee No : 88009617 And Recorded : January 5. 1995 Recorder's Fee No 95001169 Affects an area between subject property and the "Kinder-Care" parcel . Tax Lot 1401. July 25, 1997 3 JUL-25-197 1'('�G r<-1N ivn i iuiv i i LC • • 12. Terms, provisions and conditions, including but not limited to maintenance provisions contained in Perpetual Storm Sewer Easement Dated : March 7. 1988 Recorded : March 9. 1988 Recorder's Fee No. : 88-09618 13. Agreement for Shared Drive Easement and Maintenance, including the terms and provisions thereof. Dated : March 7, 1988 Recorded : March 9. 1988 Recorder's Fee No. : 88-09619 Between : David W. Hughes, et al • And : Kinder-Care, Inc. 14. Agreement for Shared Drive Easement and Maintenance. including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated : March 30. 1994 Recorded : April 8 1994 Recorder's Fee No. : 94033952 Between : David W. Hughes. et al And : Carl Eshelman 15. The property described herein is subject to a Washington County Transfer Tax of $1.00 per thousand, based on consideration, payable on transfer of property. Failure to pay the tax or apply for an exemption shall result in a penalty equal to the amount of tax owed, lus possible criminal prosecution punishable by a fine of not more than $500.00. NOTE 1: Any conveyance or encumbrance by Brahma Premananda Ashram, an Oregon non-profit corporation, also known as Brahmapremanda Ashram should be executed pursuant to a proper resolution of the members voted on at a duly called meeting of the membership in accordance with the By-Laws or other authority of the corporation. A certified copy of the resolution authorizing the conveyance and encumbrance and of the minutes of the meeting of the membership and a copy of the By-Laws or other authority for such conveyance or encumbrance should be furnished us in order to determine parties authorized to sign documents. NOTE 2: We find no judgments or tax liens against Michael J. Nedelisky. NOTE 3: Taxes paid in full for the year 1996-97 Total Amount : $1,602.55 Levy Code : 023-81 Account No. : 151 35DA 01400 Key No. : 275133 Affects the remainder of subject property END OF-REPORT " JMF/mh WE THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY OF PROVIDING THIS SERVICE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL Jeff Steffen (503) 222 9931. • TOTAL P.05 • • EXHIBIT A to CONTRACT FOR EXCHANGE OF REAL PROPERTY Michael J. Nedelisky and Brahma Premananda Ashram A TRACT COMPRISED OF PART OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 10, 1995, FEE NO. 95055808, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,IN THE CITY OF TIGARD,WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 53; THENCE NORTH 2°03'00" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.95055808; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NORTH 87°57'01"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE"POINT OF BEGINNING"; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 2°03'00"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 37.38 FEET;THENCE NORTH 49°06'23"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 91.68 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.95055808;THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 87°58'19"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 107.57 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT;THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT SOUTH 2°57'13"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 94.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT SOUTH 87°57'01"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 180.47 FEET TO THE"POINT OF BEGINNING". CONTAINING 14,997 SQUARE FEET,MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT B to CONTRACT FOR EXCHANGE OF REAL PROPERTY Michael J. Nedelisky and Brahma Premananda Ashram BEING A PORTION OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DECRIBED AS PARCELS I, II AND III IN DEED RECORDED JANUARY 5, 1995, AS FEE NO. 95001169, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY AND STATE OF OREGON, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 53; THENCE NORTH 2°03'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 10, 1995, FEE NO. 95055808, DEED RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON, AND THE"POINT OF BEGINNING";THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED AS-PARCELS II AND III IN SAID-DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.95001169 SOUTH 2°03'00"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 110.23 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCEL I IN SAID DEED;THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89°03'05" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 287.47 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SOUTHWEST HALL BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD NO. 947); THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 0°56'55"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 32.07 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL I;THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89°51'54"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 338.23 FEET;THENCE ON A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 50.00 FEET DISTANT TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCELS II AND III NORTH 2°03'00"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 148.07 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.95055808; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 89°57'01"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE"POINT OF BEGINNING". CONTAINING 17,180 FEET MORE OR LESS. • tJ:.1! Lv/1770 14.U...7.0 JU.34L11/U7 W-WULt LtbiLiN 1-1-4lit 1i2 - : , - 0.48' E i'I awa U nc , :. Oe.' -- ' • st4-9428 . • LIN. 1_ • U NE e ...• . i• •1 PARCEL I LINE 6 225.05. 225.94'{ ':• _______--.--7---. 29.08' 11•r5E 19' r l w 0.•00'00• E 1 .. . W ►1 Z ke• '' r S PARCEL 11 i- .INE 2 • IN in •c•l •�9, • t, I. • 6.:74'„,, , • �+ 99055012- o z P1 • = •o o -. 1 ' E m _■ CO 3/4• tp �r/� `-' TRACT l R•o. o.t' • x�4 ^ EXISTING 71.160 R1 %• foul!,HELD FOP SOOTN LINE CC LOT 19 _ NE1 58.133 f6 . . .� -ET76ER ACRE TRACTS'. J N. ,,. �\ • AS PER CS-3OeO . $ { >' •• F51f-503�.tf- I,SA' 05810 1 . _ PARCEL 111 ' {9 • :N88'0 05'ti • 11- - LINE 14 ••-.:.._::N..ar-a8' 8`..1.. Y2e.s7• (229:96'1 • `:- • 1.7..E • .. '>5' •:, . i(ersa•1s• .— (FD u41 1P1 Fuj nu 4 Ll1iE • g &q jN 99.00'00-c1' t+ ,.�� .S•�L DI-5 mjQa,.... `'a'3 FALLS N97•se 1s'T1 :.o.ts' 58 la1 r R - 14.9970 e..'1�� 0 9:_,., tl . . : PROPERTY LINE ' •° t IR g': 10 z1 797127 �� ; 0) TMCT. 1 SEE DETAIL 2 E1(IS11NS ssbsseoe N 02'03'00'•E::, POINT OF BEGINNING • SHEET 2 •L•F0 5/9• IR .,.:9C • "> r/AL(N CAP wIu • it PPEPFRn uPE 37•W - S.E. CA AR 950$5904 0.3.1+.0. 12.92 180.47' ,.- p • 22 FALLS N42•5e•21 . �•o- ` N e7•s7 oI• r 230:47 FALLS 0.13 s o.O.o.T. 7, E IB LINE 7 1 .x•`; 0.16' r SRAilt L .K. • . PARCEL It 1 'r;;X 4k; ^ 1 FD 5/8' IR 95001199 �.Y1..`.•i Sf.'�^^eo as�r -' ::. t T N I9 a " >-.. 4a�oss::..'1141E 9::�.: •+ • DMA 0.4 i 21./870 1 • I . ( `�j'i. r' •87,•;` r' M•FALLS S219'03'0: o-- :;. t : 0.0.0.T. " NELO M-5 �• 3/4• IP 1 PaoPOSEO ACCESS EASEMENT —•--_;•1 -! `•s,R:" 0 FALLS NerC$'o5•r-.0.26• 23 j 'N•co 518' IR 231.95' (231.88', v1 • f" :•A��;: .• ^ •/ RFD PLASTIC Q!00 N Or05'42' • in 80.00.00• t'•' I 1":4•' ' r'::" .7`r: . 5147.'0 s:: .yt ..x"': /. '°EA INC' N • LINE 4 81 pt'.' x..';.i �;'• A 1 •4E1, .. ... _ 'I ... ..arc :• 5'T•tr• 25� � �;�'�. .��• '950011®.*oFaGr._.�-".::_ ,.� IR) TRACT 2 I :f; f•..• 1' -',t;. ..6:4,3(-'-- ..•:... . - :.v la r EXISTING 75,p700 .•1.. -:, 1.: .- gF: :'919:21`. •y• E rs S 09.51'$4• E d19.e5'> •� g - ICY 80.067 1 L 1 HE 11 •` .• ° F ( j i 23 2,_ f No's••E 2 � 1 _.. �• . 1 290.52' v M •••4 1 c .N•13'°3.05•• LIHE 12 ° IR � • P X11 1 $ I ; •Q• 0.2�p „ b s m 1 0' I 05-3080 o q• OS E I I Lf-SEE DETAIL 3 KIND e e6`e- •LINE. I4 : . I I . : SEET 2 '• ' = ... ..<291.77•> N sesl's4'• LINE 13•LINE 3 oow+0.1 . . . .. -209.90• . % ::,'..I 1 •P• -89'31.61'4 - 0.77 er59 ' `- - --- - / . \ 234.80' (234.71'1 ' • N '19• r 1 N erww on. Cl- • ` (Irear • surve ors ; ` •. • • engin.eers : ` planners MAY 1 , 1997 W.B. Wells and W. B . WELLS & ASSOCIATES , INC. — JOB# 96-095 associates inc. 4230 N.E Fremont St Portland,OR 97213 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Mme(503)2U-50.90 FAX(503)284-8530 TRACT 1 •'A TRACT COMPRISED OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS RECORDED AUGUST 10 1995 AS FEE NO'S 95055810. . AND 95055812 AND PART OF . 95055808• SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35 , TOWNSHIP 1—SOUTH,— ' RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE .MERIDIAN, IN. THE . CITY OF TIGARD.,. WASHINGTON COUNTY IN THE • STATE OF OREGON BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. . STOTT" DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 53 ; THENCE NORTH 2°03 '00" EAST, A DISTANCE: :'OF • 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT. DESCRIBED:. IN• DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO 95055808 AND . THE "POINT OF BEGINNING', " - THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH- LINE OF SAID TRACT NORTH 87°57'01" WEST A, DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; - THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH. LINE... NORTH 2°03'•00": EAST, A DISTANCE:- OF 37:.38' FEET; THENCE NORTH '49°06':23"` WEST., : A DISTANCE : OF 91 .68 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE: OF 'SAID TRACT • DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.- 95055808; . THENCE ALONG. SAID:; NORTH: LINE NORTH 87°58'.19" .WEST,• .A DISTANCE OF .107 . 57.: FEET`:-TO:THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT j:• THENCE ALONG THE WEST. LINE OF, SA:tD - TRACTS RECORDED AS FEE -NO-:. 95055810 AND 95055812 NORTH .2°57 '13;":; EAST, A DISTANCE OF.•283.41 FEET TO .THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY :NO. 217 ; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF—WAY LINE:ON..A 11 ,319.16 FOOT RADIUS NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST (CHORD BEARS SOUTH 49°34'48" EAST, — 420. 66 FEET) A DISTANCE .O 420.69 FEET TO A POINT. OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055812 SAID LINE ALSO BEING --THE SOUTH -LINE OF LOT 19 , BLOCK--"O" , "METZGER ACRE TRACTS" ; THENCE . ALONG SAID- SOUTH LINE NORTH 89°03.'05" WEST, A DISTANCE. OF 105 . 32 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055810 ; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE • AND THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808 SOUTH 2°03 '00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 115 . 07 FEET TO THE "POINT OF BEGINNING" . CONTAINING 56 , 133 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. Exceptional Service, Creative Solutions, Quality Beyond Your Expectations. urve ors H•, • • -ngineers planners MAY 1 , 1997 W.B. Wells and W. B. WELLS & ASSOCIATES, INC. — JOB# 96-095 associates inc. 4230 N.E Fremont St Portland,OR 97213 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Phone(503)284-5896 FAX(503)284-8530 TRACT 2 A TRACT COMPRISED OF LAND DESCRIBED. AS PARCELS I ,. II AND .III IN. DEED RECORDED JANUARY 5 , 1995 AS FEE NO. 95001169 SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35 , TOWNSHIP 1. SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST., WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN THE CITY OF. TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY IN . THE STATE OF OREGON .TOGETHER WITH PART OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 10 , 1995 AS FEE NO. .95055808 SAID PART BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS ,A: STOTT.. DONATION LAND CLAIM NO.. 53 ; THENCE NORTH 2°03'00" EAST,: A DISTANCE :OF 780. 39 . FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED .IN`. DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO: .95055808, THENCE ALONG THE.-SOUTH :LINE OF • _ SAID TRACT 'NORTH 87°57 '01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 :FEET =TO THE "POINT OF BEGINNING" ; THENCE LEAVING. SAID SOUTH._. LINE': NORTH 2°03'00" .EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37 ..38 FEET; THENCE NORTH .49°06'23.". •. WEST,. A DISTANCE OF 91..68 FEET. TO THE NORTH LINE .OF.. SAID.: ::TRACT, .- DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED :AS:-FEE NO. 95055808 ; THENCE :.ALONG SAID;_ NORTH LINE 87°.58'19": WEST, `A DISTANCE OF 107. 57_ FEET TO:`.THE NORTHWEST.'CORNER OF SAID TRACT THENCE ALONG THE WEST".LINE OF- SAID i - TRACT SOUTH 2°57 '13" WEST,. A : DISTANCE OF 94.86 . FEET TO .`THE - SOUTHWEST CORNER -.OF :SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH. LINE OF SAID TRACT SOUTH 87°57 '01 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 180. 47 FEET TO THE "POINT OF BEGINNING".. CONTAINING 90 ,067 SQUARE FEET, MORE-OR-LESS . • Exceptional Service, Creative Solutions, Quality Beyond Your Expectations. -urvears • • -ngineers Tanners MAY 1 , 1997 1111W.B. Wells and W.B. WELLS & ASSOCIATES, INC. — JOB# 96-095 associates inc. 4230 N.E Fremont St Portland,OR 97213 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Phone(503)284-5896 FAX(503)284-8530 EXCHANGE TRACT A TRACT COMPRISED OF . PART. OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 10 , 1995 AS FEE NO. 95055808 SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION. 35 , TOWNSHIP 1.SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY IN THE STATE OF OREGON BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS ,A. STOTT. DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 53 ; THENCE NORTH - 2°03'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER- OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED' IN'::. DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO ,95055808-; THENCE ALONG THE .SOUTH :LINE_ OF SAID. TRACT NORTH .87°57:'151" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00° .FEET- TO -THE- "POINT OF BEGINNING"; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE; NORTH 2°03 00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37 .38 FEET; . THENCE NORTH- 49° "_". WEST, A DISTANCE OF. 91'...68 FEET TO- THE NORTH LINE : OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. . 95055808 , THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE •NORTH 87°-58'-19" :WEST, A _DISTANCE OF 107 :57:_FEET:.: surveyors - • • engineers • planners MAY .1 , 1997 W.B. • Wells W. B. WELLS & ASSOCIATES , INC. — JOB; 96-095 and associates LEGAL DESCRIPTION inc. 4230 N.E Fremont St. Portland,OR 97213 ACCESS EASEMENT Phone(503)284-5896 _ FAX(503)284-8530 BEING A PORTION OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCELS I , II AND III IN DEED RECORDED JANUARY 5 , 1995 , AS FEE NO. 95001169 , RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST _ QUARTER OR SECTION 35 , TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH , RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE. CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY AND STATE OF OREGON, BEING MORE .PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATION - LAND CLAIM. NO:. 534 THENCE NORTH 2°03 ' 00". EAST, A_ DISTANCE. OF 780 .39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN - . DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO: 95055808 AND THE "POINT OF BEGINNING:" THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCELS. 'II AND III IN SAID DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO: 95001169 . SOUTH, 2°.03 '00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 110 . 23 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF<-THE; TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCEL I IN . SAID: DEED r THENCE. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 'SOUTH 89°03 '05" .EAST, A 'DISTANCE OF 287 .47 FEET .TO. THE, :WEST'. LINE OF SOUTHWEST HALL BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD NO. .947_) ; = THENCE;': ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 0°56' 55" WEST, -,A DISTANCE -OF 32 ...07 FEET TO THE;`SOUTH: .LINE OF SAID PARCEL I ; THENCE ALONG :SAID: :SOUTH LINE NORTH_:'8'9°51' 54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 338 .23 FEET; THENCE .ON A LINE THAT :IS PARALLEL WITH; AND 50 .00 FEET DISTANT TO THE EAST LINE.. OF SAID _PARCELS II AND III NORTH 2°03 '.00" EAST," A DISTANCE OF 148. 07 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN -DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.. '95055808 ; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 87° 57 '01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50 .00 FEET TO THE "POINT OF BEGINNING" . CONTAINING 17 , 180 . SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS . Exceptional Service, Creative Solutions, Quality Beyond Your Expectations. • • NEIGHBORHOOD MTG AFFIDAVITS & NOTES • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE . wITHIN': EVEN: :_ ::> ENDAR AXS:4F:::'SHE SI(tN::rSS `I TG<:1.E3`:....RtN;?'`E S>._:. .;Fh.;:A:gr.: ::::is ion:::>:>::�: ><<:<<:::<: :>:«=> >:: < :::::; »>::<> '::: . >: :..:: ; ....;::.....:;::>„..„::<:;>::»::;:»:::::<::>::»::>:::�:>:::; :>::; ::::>:< ::>;Planriiri.=3)ivis I, S 4 ) E T T'ws61-P-.. , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed "13IZ4t PIA- flag-oil ArN4c D TfixvIV/Zddmikaffecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) I ISI.5- 5w• k 4IA, 16LJD I4,org-), •02 07223 , and did on the 17+ ' day of l-1515ev"-P 20 0 I , 1:Q personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a YEMPLE/ P-S HP-Prvvi PD application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 11.1e- ENT']' CE TO Ti-1 E- S I TF /41— 1.1414 Y1 L-V T) IL At T ROE CND p F Ak c c-ES s R ,4D .w N C-- 11-t E sir ,Ai-P--0,4 f t n.5 (state location you posted notice on property) AG • Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the 40 day of Ap rt1. AG-9-1. .: o�ICIAi sou tv. • KUSUM IIAEHNDIRATTA iCtunit4 -{%u c NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.303431 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON MYCOMM�ssroN WIRES Juu�ze,2oo1 � My Commission Expires: ,T• 2-8., 2-4- 0/ • (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) rNAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: 612 V m A N) A A3N 1Tb ITT lt4e LE- I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: G-P /ME-Alp co / /5 w fzrt►•nn pro Name of Applicant/Owner: I V A('Lar_ti .i ^ p • �Address or General Location of Subject Property: I I S I S S k/ k Lt- g Lll�) , T 14 4 12-i) 0 �- ]?�� !Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): I S 13 5 T) '• PI LOTS I' 1►� 35 5 I I h:Yopinlpatty masterslaffpostmo • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) 4/7 E TT/MA-FL , being duly sworn, depose and say that on M d112 CO 2 ,1801 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) I I SI S S /-109-1-1.- 1-VD , 114 D, o R a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 0 ' s • F '• ' ' h with postage prepaid thereon. • Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) • (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ;mow day of �1. OFFICIAL SEAL KUSUM MERNDIRATTA ,,• ALA-5-. NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �:.� '� COMMISSION NO.303431 W COMMISSION CORES JULY 2B,2001 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON 'Z0 My Commission Expires: al (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) rNAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: 9A— Mr N''R M TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: - ' - •I-0 • • r .:.V Name of Applicant/Owner: v S • .i■ L-_si • AIL I Address or General Location of Subject Property: • . - : VV D • 4 ► - _ I Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): 1 0 • 77=17 LOTS 1 • C O 350 I ---------------------------------------------------------------------J Nvop invattywastermermaU.mst • • 3/02/2001 RE: Brahma Bremananda Ashram 11515 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Interested Party, I, Sam Adettiwar, am representing the owners of the referenced property and vacant lot land immediately north and west. The affected tax lots are 1400 and 1800 of map 1s1, 35DA. We are proposing to build an addition to the existing house and isolated temple north of the existing house. The existing house at 11515 SW Hall will be retained and remodeled. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend the meeting on: Thursday, March 22", 2001 Tigard City Hall, at the: Town Hall Meeting Room 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 7:00 pm Please notice this will be an informal meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-646-9069 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Sam Adettiwar, MS, PE Senior Engineer Meeting The Applicant, Sam Adettiwar, is proposing to build an addition to the existing house and an isolated temple at • this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, the applicant would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday,March 22, 2001 7:00pm Tigard City Hall, at the: Town Hall Meeting Room 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Project Developer Contact: Sam Adettiwar • Phone Number: 503-646-9069 Please note: This is an informal meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. • • NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Date: March 22, 2001, 6.30PM, City of Tigard Hall, Tigard, OR Project: BrahamaPremananda Ashram/Temple Project NAME ADDRESS PHONE NO. /-0 s L /V'� �ff-ri5.®,v 7ze p3 - - �l c 4 • 17 L,_3 3 s'y/ 119 755 na 3v Supm.:thx. rEaVicfriesH 160351\114 Sche of hre. -\--y- *0--2-? / 2 s-c73 - o4.;j At ' N C rr A t N .)G -1 iS cp • • NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Date: March 22, 2001, 6.30PM, City of Tigard Hall, Tigard, OR Project: Brahamapremananda Ashram/Temple Project Meeting Notes: ),_ ,S #L I �'U - in N S p 1-9v"c v1 c 7I S J r G,L�G.G [ 9 14-4-A-5 t) o�►� �v,' h C)-ty . -. s s -QL� � c ke 5(9o4 s e._ s c (Del t - (1° re,,L4,4;‘.1 is 4_14„A, „,;1 koi- 4_,:› Do-xi/1.e_ 1-k-ct 11-1--- 1 c2tA clpj crt-1--- 113:vhs (,(Aii 12, • • NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Date: March 22, 2001, 6.30PM, City of Tigard Hall, Tigard, OR Project: BrahamaPremananda Ashram/Temple Project Meeting Notes: tie & 'TOW; / eAc, .e 's l 01 s e-a-rf jrf-04, 9. cet,t, ktig t_S c,Lan.v1-e- 60'11 4-vz-w--420— CA) cik h�s1'rv+� c,x-4' • , 1e-- }'L e vc>d ( 5 ens H 5 1Z1,10°Ilse — C.-er Y r Loyvl .c 4,7 ep-k +0 V -tiz �-o orb fe l ex- Q'e s v ' 4- c /1$' Lek- VI , O a,t- +-ems- s ° b_e_ et"jyvvo _ i YLtie j 1,1_4D 2-12.41".0 vQ00 1Al2_ 7-awl cow sc,vri,s 04)e-e 4-d • L.)J N 1� 29 1 105.0► 1 25 °o 6 '`? \ s.E. 17 ' IT' N89°34.22"E s O ` N 0y \ b0 CRAHgN R DAVID C '�i/i/i�//��/�4,7101 ik IT ! 4400 �. 0 I 4000 \ a" o.�.c N 90 , T y a '^\ .34Ac. \ X ° 52 a 2202 ► I 400 .46 AC q0 104.93 105.02 85.25 / 100.73 O ~GRA AL POINT Q ,I J/!Ir/1/i0 00g�� �( �/��O 6. :.o O J. 1 GRAHAM ACRES - -Igo - O n t -s.- 3A \.0 4� g3��� \a��o1\1`,r:�:i�iJ`��� 220.68 yACATED TB-SS-E n. n 11 `/� . ICI 500 N I 2200 70 A (YEW STREET r ti ' ° .26 AC. el 1.5/Ac. ---� r- N89°34•E 200 26.45 ..1,O d X y'Cf CO 3800 _z I 14 �m 4 1� 50 2702 4800.0 rr�. 'o°°cq (/�o o •30 Ac o- d 160 tb" - - - V 0.0. 39Ac. ��a e•,�e�io'i �p �'�bti j 2100 p• o m 4ie Oy O. 1 4,0�: L11 o I 5100 . 'a9 40 a - .62 AC. 11 1 700 n $ v N 0 200 �.. 6LK 65 SEE MAP IS I 3508 sas°3a'w '�t4900 5000 1m o.ti _> / r?39Ac. n► 2 v 3 / `to tr0 ` \ n J r r� Q o V 2000 P: ti0 O o� - co A A °: se9°s1�e'3r7J'w ' D 1� At.. • �� � 2000 Al 15 W I_ N89°34'W 200 103.33 1 140.51 `• ` o N69°54'E 482.33 \ ` 70 t0. O A • Z L2s 173 t M O � I 1n a n 4200 175 2803 `\ 2801 - w ,4 �°' �, a IJ o .28 Ac 1 1•` .24 Ac ■ /.006 Ac. n N x z I 1900 r m n \ N .05AC 7 0 w. 74.97 m \ N ti I$ Ii 7.1V \ 5 , L•xy 91.48 4300 N 89°20.E 1 3 N88°W -1 X / -i4 86-35395 ii, N ai 2`/�' a 2802 3 34►L1 N I 350w0_ I `63 S.W. ���1� N !J� °N N .264 . N m i2/4 1 I .9 9 $ i . n I C.S. 5327 • r IIOC sa » a 0 it cl ii 589°57'00.W 110.99 w 273.69 _ /2 174.90 • 473.3 6!/L 224.6 66.5 120 N89°30'30'E 162.7 /'fin o 2900 32000 ! I N °.07AC X pp t .65Ac. I800/� ■ .40.. 4 L 1 r 3 .02Ac. 19 O : Q o l :,r,o = 25 f 203.96- I700 " C.S.630 °z 10757 N 8 w 0 .25 AC - 226.7- - - 66.5 -!20 3503 / C� "o'~ n EASEMENT rill .344c N89°31'E 279:71 N3 n -I • • N mQ 1600 J. -o m x- n ccI 180.47 42 AC. SEE MAP o 1 30 j of • . ..- N89°31•E z W 1 m 3 J 22 175 _,r' IS I 35 DD .-Lawa 1400 a 3100 � Z as°OI /•75Ac. �1 N r '5°°ct m 29Ac. . ° _° °I= .50 AC Z 2 _ _ 206.88 0 1488°W - - - EASEMENT 2000-18254 Z 1 175 = 1 w 300 M/L ► a :.-J 3200 I 1 I IEASEMENT 88-9619 M 1 300 3/Ac. ° m Z m m 1401 289.85 . 60 ./04C 0 A A - u oz - r o '^ 72.4c. - 300 M/L - - ?3 • N C.S. 4611 °°, I _ o_ 10•-. 20 i� 175 - m o id C.S. 3060 co 3300 J N I / .r, 0 • .3/Ac. z o 04 8.3 291.77 301.9 m 0 A A < I H oa s89°11'W 302.1 . us 175 - a 9 - °l -� (5 Nee°w 234.78 os.ie / pRNOTSRELY ON FOR PURPOSES ON1 589°31'W 453 THEi 50 499,21 s 011 .SEE MAP IS I 3500 • F .,;. • • MOOMMENES -wow ' Brahma 0 1 3remanand 1:_......::- .....:..::. ::::.::::.::::.:::::::•.:_.... .•. ..• •••• • „:::::::::......:::.:.:.:..:.::::.:•:.. :.::.. : :„.::: .::::::::•::.::.„:::.:.::::::.:::•• .,....::: • • : • .• ..- :. •:::.:::::. .....• :::::::::::::.: . • •• . :::.•..... . .. . .. .. .... •••••• . •••.• ••• v . ., re'-... •• ..... , . ......... ••••• • kal.:•„„ . ...,,•.. [....?::,,,.. .! • •••• ..,..--:::.• • ,....... .. .• : ••:„ „ .. . • . , . /. • •,, ••••• ..„••• .. . . • •• •••••••„.„.. :.••• ..., . . ..• :. . ..,.....,.... .• . ....„.„..„,•••••„:•::::::,•:::: , i • • •• :...,..... • ••• • . .., • ••••• . . . .••• . :. •••••••••••,. ..„ . :.•••: • .• ...„ •.. „'......,•,;„.4:1,.....4\... • • .,..,,4,-,'''''""'••' ' • 4 , ../ .... • .......•.: .. . .. .....;..)'''.' ' '...e..0.! 4‘......■......; .•• .••• ••.. . • ::: :: : ....44.:.;...1.: ...:.::.:.......: .::: . .• .... . . • ...,.............2 ••• ::::::::. •..• :::.:::::::::::. ;1,.,i,.7..,,,,,,ill ri:.:1:1111.-....:4..tt4.4!..:,....c.:.... millm..:„......mings....-:-.............-:. .::•:•:01111:11:11;I i;bi 1.::.:.::::...!..11,":::::...:.:1w. . ' ::::.-..:...:;...;::: . . .. .:.... .. ml...•.:0:4: : ir.....V*:,::.::: ".':.,::!:, T :::::::.• r' . -...-:::.:•::1:T5:::ii:;•'... ...:::::::::::::?! .:".". •••::::..:•;:::•.....:-.:•.:"::.....:::::::::.; • • ma.:::::•:::.u: 4 r:iiel:::..::•:.•:.kg: :.. • gli5 0 ...... • •. ••••• • ••.-1,••:1.•:•:.::.:.•.••..:.:::"::::!:::::i::::: ................: • •:•:' •••:••• • ••••• ••- •••••• .: •+:::.•• •• aill"...•.• "' :n:7%-wig. iii• 41:1111P 11:1111r --•• • m 4dx.:.• .•;:4; ::.:::..:'•: .......:.. • . . :Iih :::::;:•::.:.„.:, .:::: ir• tr.„. :er : .. ., , ..., ..:... . ••-'.'-:••••••. ... • l'''........... :::::.:::.:.m• • ... ... .::.::::!!.:4..:11'11:."...I ;::::'.2••I.. . :::_:: '.::•10.1..::..:..:. le,,r . • . , ......... •- . . -, • , , ..• t . .. . • •• • ••- • •• ••••• ',4''''11:•:.' •1..ni.::', ....:4-...1, f- •.;14,4, Nr4P*10:-.•'.' . ,...'•4:4 '.4. , ..... . . .. , . A. • ....• • ...xi 0. :.. ..... • • „ .... •• - • •••• .. •• • ••• •• '••••••11 19••••••1 '•••• ..... • "'... •••••••••••.....••••!........... ., ...... _ • :: .... ....... .. . ...... , 4--P3 .. 77.117 :,- y.: :. ...4.0016ieliF:51ti,__I' '''' •••-•-.,••••••:::•:,:lisarte.'......,-; x■:,ft:eijjo.::....; 4.4,:,•_:•.;.•••• • ....... ...: •.•••• . : .., :„,.. ... ,,. •••,...el.....:1•• A. ,.4....h.),.4.4, e4.i 4::::.. -111-1 -17411 . • . Fiz!z7--- L.a.,.: .., LA.... ... • : .4.3' .,O yri...i....... •.• • . • •••..•-• • ..,......... • . . . . .... .. —6'4'. . ,. • ...., ‘ , . ;504,17-„zi•,•,,,-r-maiiitr-1,-,--...a-............_ ..,..,,,;4*6 „._ _ • •= .••••••••••••••••• .• . __••••••••• ...... .... .•'''‘".4 ,!.`"..**;°W..4%;,-..."--- ,• ma,.ftye ,,,,,,,.... ■.... , .„.. ,..„,,, „„, .,...,, ................. .... .... . . . ..„........,...... . . .......„. . .,., .,,.., ,.. ,. , ......... . 4 ......,.."..st..,.........'...ral , *1 „...... Rogiew . •• . rr •• ' •• -• • . ..--- . ... • ..."'""""• '" • .. 4** • *** • •••.. • •• i lEt Ai *....- •... .....• , •••••••• --...., , •.*:,....,:r•••••-..**:*1•.•,........•E•••••.•':•: • • •: ..'--..- .,,..l•. 1...,Z'i.',4..iZlli• :...,..,,.,..../... * : ''' ,„,.. - J•: ii...•.: ,:,',,, , ;.,. )....:'t",.:.••'.;:'i'.•••.•:..•***.**,***.'•'••..•.1.'...:••••'.• .l..•••• ..r4••• ' ;•Io : m • 4 i 74g . 1 • ... ' . , ....... -------'- •,.......i'.•:*.:••:!:'....i'r.,..4 Q . ...•''''''..............!•:,,,,.,... ..-..*:i..1'.......4....1,,,''.. ._ ••-• '., •..„.4 .:.. ''''” i ..........2.•'..........,::.:***-1L.• ' ••...... • ....: ..,....,kiic».•:•..:n..V.....11''•,.•• •,:i!F....::::..;,:ii......r2+ ...,''',f;'''''''i:5,l'"7'-' ..''.:"3.. , y • • '.••• I . : • , ••••• •••• ,• :•:: fel..1-7 4.1.•.2;.:.V.- - • :,.•.:111,,:r.:7•::•,:::.. ••••.AAA ..,...;::,.....3:..:•.,'„,...„&,...,„:,......t.i......, ..... . . . ., . . .. . • • • . .. • • .. . . • . • . ...-.:. . . •• • . . . .. . *. . • • . . • • . . . • • • . . . . . .. .. • • • •.. . . . . . . . . . . • • .. . ...............„ . . .. . . . .i • • . .. • . •• • • .. . . . .. • . • . . • • • . •• . . . :::;:ii:1:,.;;,•iiiii:ix*".'''...:'1::11::;E:::ff:::•:: 1 • • . :.. . ,:............1,...1 ., •:.:: : •*.•:-•,•• ••:1::..".i:!,;:1:;:;:::::::,.. ,, :....«,,....• ...... .... . . .. . . . • . . . • .. . • . . . . .... . .. .. . '..,1::.::::;;;;;, 4: :.;.•.: ..,;-: ., ....,.... • . • ......................... . • . • • •. •••••••••,.........-:-:..--..•-•-- ''••••••••••••:::::.::::•:::.:.:, • . . .• .. • • '...*:...-.2' ..7:-— ..:-......c.;;;...--......***'•A...{ . --A 4 •. . . . .. ..... , •....•• ••••• •• • . ... . . . .. • .. •• . .. . . . . . .x.;:4„,.....‘•''''''...- **........:::**......!....'''....-•'•••. • .••• : •.. .444,K?' .'....4.:i:::......''''••••••••••....*:•••I....-:-.••: ..................*:::...:::::••::•.:•:::•:....... : I i • : . •..... ..........•••...........................•••••• ........:::..-• ••......•...f:::::::::::::::::::":•:•••:"—:..:..'.....:::::::::::::.:.:.:.;.:.:.;• ... . . . . .. •••• • ; •• ..: .•.•• ........ • • :. • •. . .• .-....:...ikigiv:::1:-Tfir..... ••••• • •• . . . ...... ...• . . •••.......:....... .. • ••••-.. • . .... .. ...:::::''.'•.*. • • ••... . ••• .•••...• i•••i••••''.•-',.00‹....:::.........::"...,3::..........% . • :4:1= '4. • ... • • t. •••••••. .• . :_...:. ....f..... ...:::::::.••• .:rt., . .. ........ . ....... .. .. .... ..•:. • • .:: .., .-. • • • - . . . •• - - -- - -••••• -- - ••. • .. . •• •.••• • •• •....... •" :.::::::::::::1 -•:::41... I . • • k(..)...!,, •„..' „ .)•\.. i 3 41_1i 1 1 4,....'7, •. Aiii .. • ::,,..,••"!T:':'-. _mow ..,q ::-... . i ..........11:19't....1i4g1 .• • I -..- . •.......•••'•'••it'.-...,:::' ..... ...............-4.01pw.::: .. .., 1.,r ..•;?,1.t.:• . i . ..•• • •... .::ii,,.. .4... •• '..........1...................' .,.. ......!..........:r.......... .........— . .::::1111:119'..E:::roVit:-.-.:'• .• .• : ............::,.....lip. ............i.:.:::..:: ..... • .• • • ... : ... . .. .:. . : . ... . .. . • : . . •. :. . : .. ...._._...... . .. • . .. NE --APPLICA7PM CpNFERENcE_ NoarEs • • • CITY OF TIGARD - . ,•PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES -. . o DGttaon -I- Community(Development, SlapingA Better Community . (Pre-Application Meeting Notes,are Valid for Siz(6) Months) ..-, ;-- ,,, ,r NON-RESIDENTIAL ��ouS '�'/` �`°``,' PRE-APP-MTG-DATE: ` 3 D c '' D" VA-A77-?9 �GVP STAFF AT PRE-APP.: fro` _ 26 APPLICANT: S A-erwit ViSik.er Preima taft4ccr AGENT: $4t hjt°f t; tad` Phone:(503) 57$ 'i 30 73 Phone: (503 6/C— ,riP6? S �i2 1aaO f/D Ss a )£ A/I /lour 11 -/� PROPERTY LOCATION: q�� ���r ACT ��� ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: /1 SI S S�NQ1/ [Y ' TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): Lc35VA IG�c S l7y©. ct .3503 11116 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: �t `°+-//1 jo' !?�aT :0.1 # is /_titz) ---pu fVj C y So cc,vtcee ua1 crt-1 .Jet.;1 Pk-, or 'u f a/ PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: I A..,A.., t/i,„ f• ASIA Y'c 1 'I ut Lia4Ct �1&7 CO 45/e/A 01;c9 1,4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - MAP DESIGNATION: 0,frs. - `is - r - • _. • ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C—! ice/r srowal cpu,-ut-,r!`cict 1 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.) AREA: St onL O 20� f-vot,e" s f ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.52 Zo MINIMUM LO IZE6_tsq. ft. verage I'•. • width: 50 1. Max. building eight: 4 S ft. Setbacks: Front ft. Side 0/20 ft. RearO 20ft. Corner ft. from street. ' MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: g5 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /5 %. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page I of 9 ' NON-Residential Rppliation/Ploonieg Division Section • • NARRATIVE [Refer to Code Chapter 18.390] The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050] As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY. with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, C the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type r of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real - property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ' ©— F ck S Dace freer ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765] s " • Minimum number of accesses: .� /I Minimum access width: 30 _\ Minimum pavement width: 2 if' u—i It cutrt5 All driveways and parking areas, exp pt for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: !!�a// . WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.705.030] WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR - ' CES O FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, i titutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and e ,Walk ays shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.730] 1 / / > STREETS: 4S feet from the centerline of /mil / LY . ---- > LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. > • FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS .- Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a .height of 75 feet provided that:. > A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will be at least half('h) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residentiil Appliution/Phnning Division Section • • The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: O feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. (o --ZB feet along south boundary. ,0-20 feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG:d /0d-it /of crv`ttz� . LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.7051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. M I. 144 Lt't 14 PARKING [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 s , /- 3 Se1ts �A REQUIRED parking for this type of use: �- 2 Sit asse4/14a L/ (, rise Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY US REQUIRED parking: /�fO 1/ 5 k's h 0‘4e- Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): 7$ Spaces • NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: l0 tr> S = f ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. cD ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches.Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Oil OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Din¢ion Section • • • BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMIL COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas otected from tomobile traffic and in convenient locations. • SENSITIVE LANDS -[Refer to Code Chapter 18.715) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. • STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.115.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA)BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R s 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive r---===-)K area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: USA DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 A :;rx •`s SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH;OF°VEGETATED« SENSITIVE`fAREA DEFINITION d TO-SENSITIVEAREA;;, , ,CORRIDOR PER;SIDE;,,; .; • • Streams with'intermittent flow draining: • <25% 10 to <50 acres 15 feet • >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 10 to <50 acres 30 feet • • >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from-50-200 feet. Measure • • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25% slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve.as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. aTY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Residential Appliation/P12nning Division Section • • Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the USA Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. USA Service Provider Letter: PRIOR.TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a USA Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, USA must still issue a letter stating a USA Service Provider Letter is not required. SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and'species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢" Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; . ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.11 REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: • ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residential Appliatioo/Planning Division kction • • • ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably. located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, • private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. . . CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795] The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT (Refer to Code Section 18.797.030] The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS)AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ ' The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential Appliatian/Planning Division Section . • ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.797.1001 The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.100 that demonstrates all of the following: > Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.100 regulating removal of native plant species; , > That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ • The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 . MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the • . parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE APTERS 61 8.330(Conditional Use) (8.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.75(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ) 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.115(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) 1 8.705(Access/Egress/Grculation) 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.110(Accessory Residential Units) /8185(Temporary Use Permits) 18.310(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) .790(Tree Removal) 18.380(coning Map/Text Amendments) 1 8.720(Design Compatibility Standards) -�.L 1 8.195 Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ` 8.125(Environmental Performance Standards) • 18.197(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) 1 8.390(Decision Makin Procedures/I act Study) 18.130(Exceptions To Development Standards .198(Wireless Communication Facilities ( g mP Y) I P P ) /� (w ) 1 8.410(Lot line Adjustments) 18.140(Historic Overlay) �/ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 1 8.420(land Partitions) /8.742(Home Occupation Permits) . 18.430(Subdivisions) 1 18.745(landscaping&Screening Standards) ./. 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) v 8150(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) • V 1 8.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 1 8.755(nixed Solid Waste/Recyding Storage) 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 1 8.160(Nonconforming Situations) WY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Residentiat Application/Planning Division Section , • . ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: li���/IC`_�L�. • .�,_ / �i�.✓ 3M in or tA-tod i o=d oK to CUP is d>c `r � - 11(coa • 6cs 7L - .. • e L-f L - --- > 'o - doe d cc i it - '►� v r M/90c f,c=Jc`oK, ler 1 4. , 30, tO 20, R. _✓ L e:� ua CZ �/e�Q ! �� . " Val 1> fat-- e_ $c I4 e *trot, ' '//�cgid- .sLoe.t(_J 6e a -re rAcm. Jerre crre /l Q i ,'� .1 _s - ' - �� - 1�: .% �,w �/� �r e cde ;Ls Oc-cirsigh crtAd sr/-P /axac.47 crv`e s/' / to 6 e v ' p ever- L �M - / �/ 'toce i A v a - /V^l h flat 42 5i' 6cti if&PM�7 / -/ e wor A7, 45 Qr u wterc f Must 6e. c/eov`a� C�KVcNC t N , tt- 'P d'o K-.\t- /D 6e. vu f vtedi�&/e f, amt /real o K Ii r /00041% • • PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application-with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. • CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Appliation/Plenning Division Section • • The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal peri d foil .ws all and use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Gr C©ccwc-I I . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is a4ailable from the Planning Division upon request. P 9 P q Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884] PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicants are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. BUILDING PERMITS • PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective. applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). . PREPARED BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNI DIVISION - FF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4111 FAX- 503) 684-1297 E-MAIL (staffs first name)@ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: ci.tigard.or.us H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commeraal.doc Updated: 18-Jan-2001 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) 01Y Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residentiil Appliation/%bnning Division Section • • • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: )re/' YeA4013 Date: 3//3/© I 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan) ®/Vicinity Map fit eliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan !9 Existing Conditions Ma [s3 Prelimina Utilities Plan 9 P rY ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map reliminary Storm Drainage Plan Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan /Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan �ite Development Plan I ' Architectural Drawings andscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings L9' Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends oil ithe type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES Z .2COPIES OF ALL Af-FLiCAT■CN MATERIALS. City,of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 • • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis 133" Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include.a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8% x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ ♦ Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • • Transit stops ❑ • • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes>10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: ♦ Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with>_6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources . ❑ Locations of existing structures and t`3 u:zcs ❑ .. Locations of existing utilities and •c ia; ❑ . City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 • • Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map • The proposed name of the subdivision • ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): ♦ Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ ♦ Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ ♦ Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ ♦ Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ ♦ Watercourses ❑ ♦ Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ ♦ The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ ♦ The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: ♦ Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ . ♦ A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for - -- purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date p Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries p Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location,width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level p All slopes greater than 25% ❑ • Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 • • Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ • The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: ♦ Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ ♦ Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ ♦ Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: ♦ Entrances and exits on the site ❑ ♦ Parking and circulation areas ❑ ♦ Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ ♦ Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ ♦ Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ • The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ ♦ Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ ♦ Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting-considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: ♦ All areas to be landscaped ❑ ♦ Mailboxes ❑ ♦ Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ ♦ Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 • • Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ • Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure. ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height. ❑ is\;curpin\masters\revised\checklist.doc 5-Jun-00 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 1 PRE-APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE NOTES• ➢. ENGINEERING.`SECTION Q s ,cm,of Tigard,:";Community,unity Development Shaping A Better < Community PUBLIC FACILITIES • Tax Mavis): 1S135DA Tax Lot(s): 1400,1500 a 3503 Use Type: Swami Temple The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Hall Boulevard to 45 feet from centerline (convey to ODOT). ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities -❑ -foot concrete sidewalk • ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-AppNeatIon Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section Other: • • • ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: . ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk CITY OF TIGARD Pre-AppDcatIon Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section ❑ street trees • • ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. • ❑ Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Hall Boulevard. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in SW Hall Boulevard, and a 3-inch pressure service line is located in the private driveway that leads to this site from Hall Boulevard. The pressure line was installed as a part of the Hall Park Office development, and is intended to serve this site. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to provide the necessary onsite pumping system to allow connection and use of the 3-inch pressure line. Water Supply: The Tualatin Valley Water District (Phone:(503) 642-1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: CITY OF WARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section Tualatin Valley Fire and Riye District (South Division) [Conta Fric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection se es within the City of Tigard. Thrbistrict should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Onsite detention is required. Submit a preliminary plan and sizing calculation to show what system will be used. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. Traffic: ODOT will likely have the same concerns about peak period management of trip generation from this site. ODOT has previously suggested that the City require the applicant to adjust their usage schedules to minimize trip generation during the AM and PM peak hours. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section In 1990, Washington Count opted a county-wide Traffic Impa ee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collec fees from new development base on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. This type of permit requires a non-refundable $150.00 fee. In certain cases, where City costs may exceed the $150.00 fee, an administrative deposit will be required. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. This type of permit requires a deposit to be submitted with the construction plans. The amount of the deposit depends upon the overall value of the public improvements. The City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Building Division Permits: • • The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. • � o PREPARED BY: art 3 I l ( • 9'INEERING DEP •TMENT STAFF Phone: (5031639-4111 Fax: (5031684-7297 i:\eng\brianrltemplates\preap notes-eng.dot CITY OF T16ARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section • • PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR"STAFF USE.ONLY Applicant: W/�M I VI S W� peeve /}-l�ll�-1 E? Address: 11.51 S SW W PL.I✓ (3Wj Phone: 503-5,1g-3073 Case:No". . C t ZD(: � D0.O '(h City: T)q kg]) Zip: 6172 Receipt No :`;" Application Ac"epted 1361„-. ` Contact Person: 541.0 ADETTIC)/ Phone: 5D 1)-64C, . 9069 Date: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): , :.:: :, _ f ;DATE OF PRE-APP:” ' .I 3,I 3 1SP N M q//��P.��i2-1'VI�1-N 4-NIA �"Ts Pt R�T"'' TIME OF PRE-APF:4: "".CJ Address: /'l s �O'V �- Phone: PRE=APP.,HELD""WITH: City: Zip: .Rev.`1216/2000;';1:\curpin'masters\revised\Pre-App,Request.doc .' Property Address/Location(s): SAM A S PL--I c -NIT REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will be accepted qq n without the required submittal elements) Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 15152)A, T�)< LOTS 1400 1540 / c 35og QrPre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: 2 • 2 5 ACeEs 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION any o ldp like questions/issues st issues that you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be • submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn the subject scale. Also, show the location to for the meetin of the subject property in relation to the prepare g. nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject property and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either �,/ Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are ltd The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour lonq and are typically held between the hours of topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN If ON Pre-AE project,Conference is for a MONOPOLE project, the applicant must PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM attach a copy of the letter and proof in 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. the form of an affidavit of mailing, that the collocation protocol was completed IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE Community Development Code). INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Filing Fee $240.00 ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROUP. • • PROJECT NARRATIVE Project Name: Brahmapremananda Ashram & Temple Address: 11515 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223, Telephone: (503) 598-3073 The Brahmapremananda Ashram is an Oregon non-profit organization incorporated in April 1991 (240858-88) for the purpose of providing spiritual guidance and facilitating spiritual growth to people of all religions, race, and creed. The Brahmapremananda Ashram translates into English as, "Church for the Love of God" and was founded by Swami Viswa Premananda. The purpose of this construction project is to provide a gathering place and visiting facilities for people engaged in the teaching, observance and practice of religious, ethical and philosophical principles shared by and/or of interest to those people. Project Description: The project consists of two phases, (1) an addition to an existing building, the "Ashram" and (2) the construction of a "Temple" at the above-referenced address. The Ashram will be remodeled to add an 8-room two-story addition to the existing facility at 11515 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR. The Temple is the place of community worship and will be built as a separate building approximately 50 feet northwest of the existing Ashram (see Site Plan). PHASE 1-Ashram The total sq. ft for Ashram (living facilities) including the proposed addition is 3,456 sq. ft. The Ashram will include eight guest rooms, two bedrooms for the residents, and classrooms for meditation and yoga instructions as well as retreats. The Ashram will primarily consist of a meditation and yoga facility, lodging, and boarding for visiting monks or spiritual seekers. Yoga classes are currently held on a daily basis from 6 PM to 8 PM. The proposed addition will provide facilities for visitors who will be received and transported to the Ashram primarily on weekends, but occasionally after 6 PM on weekdays. It should be noted that the primary average congregant and volunteer consist of working parents/families and individuals. PHASE 2-Temple The proposed Temple will be a two-storied building and will encompass approximately 4,635 sq. ft. per floor. The Temple use is primarily for worship. The Temple facility is generally used as a conventional church for congregation and social events on weekends. The Temple will consist of the main assembly area (Temple Hall), kitchen, classrooms, and a library. Approximately 178 chairs have been planned for the main assembly (Temple Hall). The Temple will not include any residential area and will not be used for residential purposes. The Temple hours will be primarily on Saturdays and Sundays with an occasional meeting after 6 PM on weekdays. Construction Schedule: The approximate date of the beginning of construction is April-May 2001 for the Temple and Ashram. • • P01-0132 February 27, 2001 Page No. iii 1. Removal of 12 inches of topsoil and up to 12 inches of tilled farm soil and replacement with structural fill over geofabric, or 2. In-place soil-cementing of upper up to 18 inches of topsoil and farmsoil. We suggest the use of roughly 4.5% cement, however, it is the contractor's responsibility to assure that adequate soil cement percent is used on the date of operation and that at least 400 psi strength is achieved for the subgrade. We should observe the soil-cementing operations to confirm the depth and the extent. Soil cementing of the landscape(non-structural) areas is not necessary. Foundations Provided subgrade preparation procedures are strictly followed, proposed buildings can be supported on properly prepared subgrade or on structural fill using continuous and individual shallow spread footings designed for following net maximum allowable bearing capacity up to 2,000 psf. The allowable bearing capacities are intended for dead loads and sustained live loads and can be increased by one-third for the total of all loads, including short-term wind or seismic loads. Pavements We understand several different pavement sections will be used for different areas. We estimated traffic loading as two 54ft tractor trailer/day and 20 box vans/day for a design life of 15 years. Based on the results of our geotechnical evaluation and pavement design, we provide following options for different pavement sections: • • Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) March 2001 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Tuesday, March 13, 2001 . 8:00 8:30 9:00 Pre-app AIan:Deharpport 709-2277 - 11275.S.W: St. Subdivision 9:30 10:00 Pre-app appt Sam Adettiwar.503-646-9069 Swami Viswa Premananida 10:30 .' 11:00 Pre-app: 11:30 12:00 12:30 - 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 10:08AM Friday, March 02, 2001 i 1 1 1 1 1 a in 1-e1 LL u_ a I � PJ� • Ct ' .itd ' ,-111 BLVD HALL 0 is D ';. 4 , .. • U • x. o... II s i •• i E 1 81� V .• x x N th y / v and 'X/ Illipr I > 7 J iiinn > pf.;>aaj A yy ::L A. < n y$� x : ♦4 * r x .. - t s x y F.. FF r ' i ' +;F„ .:. `{ •e B • L. • t i r V 1 fP .d0. . y""41. r " n 4 r v Je :'i r Ey:y.!* � r'�S. E >M �r �': :xaa .i . :^.. y;y.r A� # B. .... .a per,.. :+i'...n. r... ,.. r. ., .... Y a�.: M ..„ ...„ ,.:, _ . . _ . t x Ep ..r. /.......... ...:... . ,..., e �. a . r yw. w • • : x u. K > ., . .x w<"......_ B • "�ik .7e 7.4e, rraltiga6... ef.. ::::.),-% row , ..., ,,-.., , r„. ,:i...1:.:4, „ .:•..:4.--,..:.; . . ;;.-.: :1/2‹..,,.... :: 1, ' Q F . 4 *..1'r77.?..0...i. 4 Feb 23 O1 04: 45p g eo tandards. com 000.00000000000 P• 1 • February 21, 2001 DRAFT The Planning Department City of Tigard Planning 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NUMBER CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002/VAR1999-00024/M1S1999-00026 Dear Sir/Madam: We provide the following preliminary data at the request of the City staff: ITEM OLD PLAN NEW PLAN Proposed Temple Building Area 4,500 sq.ft./floor 4635 sq.ft./floor Proposed Ashram Addition Area for 3360 sq.f.t.(doesn't 3,456 sq.ft. (includes Residential Use include existing exiting residential area) residential area) — Temple Basement Level FF. E1.217 FF. EI.217 Temple Upper Level FF. E1.226 FF. E1.230 Temple Height above curb E1.223.0 33ft 53ft (includes Kalashas- peaks, which is dead space/height of 31.5 ft.) Setback- Front yard 20ft 20ft Setback - Side yard 20ft 20ft Setback - Side of rear yard 55ft 20ft Inside chair /sitting arrangement 178 seats 178 or less Parking Required - 74 spaces 101 (96 plus 5 98 (6 handicapped, 23 additional proposed- compact) - Only 2 new which was denied) handicapped and 96 shared. , Feb 23 01 04: 45p getandards. com 000000000000 p- 2 • City of Tigard February 21, 2001 Page 2 Please note the following for the referenced project: • The referenced project is a 'non-profit organization'project, which is entirely funded by private donations. • The volunteer group handling the project did not clearly understand the regulations with respect to PD and other planning issues. We never understood that it was difficult to make changes to PD approvals. We had simply made a conceptual plan based on available funding at that time. Unfortunately, none of the City staff ever mentioned this despite knowing (through staff meetings and telephone conversations) that the revised plans were being prepared and changes were being made. • Since the conceptual planning (which was based on donation funds available at that time), we have been approached by generous donors who specifically have requested to build a traditional temple building. Hence, the changes have been made to the original conceptual plan. • The proposed Temple appears to be an ideal development for a landlocked property since we are providing 52,000 sq.ft, of landscape areas!!! and the site coverage of less than 40%!!!. Please note that the Temple group paid more than $50,000 to purchase the land to preserve existing trees in the northern portion, • We want to again assure the staff that we were completely ignorant about the consequences of PD rules. We request that the City consider these issues in reviewing the application. , We appreciate the opportunity to submit this letter. Sincerely, Sam Adettiwar, MS, PE Project Engineer p.. • , ....---------------KP-------:::"P".•.::'•••••••,..•••••:•."••••••••/.".•,........."7i: ....„:„,;:.:,.... ..• -).:5,z-:1"......-n..f..!.....1.:: -, .,..--..- •:::::::::::•";,••)::,:1--"-..4,,'1,..1..:-.)...'2....:::?....•:::::::-:::,......„.....-, • jILA,,11..10,..ZL ''. • „„.. . .,...,..,...•,...,:••:-..„4......„.:.•:.:t„,,,vitet,rii,.:.:4:e ' ...',.. ....,:••'-'-- -•:.:' '..... ' .... ...•-.-..,.:.-.....,,..:,.:a).A.0.4.4,.:i.4.-4444.,lit":•: -...7..1.•?•.:"1.:771:4•••:1 ';;••.5:-.::•:;.•::...t*_,*.::;•;::::1,::•-•.•,,:••:•••••Ci.•;::.:17::: ..:1,-*"."....*:•••••.•••,.•••• tz'i.:11:,61,:f.Ar•:-...::::•.,.:::k.::5-....‘,1,fftiernr.,:..:...:,,v••••:•••-.1;::.••ct:z.t....iii.:•:;;:•44,1*•:!Aii.,4 .. •'-...f .....:.1...:-.5.%!....:1'...-1:1•.;.tii0,74.47".••.:'..,-f ..;:•,A,!.k.,4.44,4:•A:0;.:4q!.;••i...zi,....: :.;Ai:v.';i:-;.: , •_.., ,„:...•,r,...:....„.,Ar....... . ,,L.........:10k4,.. ;;..,..„:„...p ....... CALAILAIL" .•....,,:e.rt,0...;:p.,..1.:-.!-...r. 7..:pp,.....••...r., ...•:::;--:•:........: •••••r :•,..-..p.-.P...v.;?.....:-,-.;.m.:.•••:,•,,rr....0:.:.::,:lso:,.:-nr... -,.,-.:.441, . ,..:•....,..5 .,......- ..,.,„:.nr.i...f,..r.:”:hr:;.•:..., '.:.•4...Pt:,•n••4lit-,9:....• ,....j.•:*eg. ...II,:!:.'.':;.••••''' .-.4;0:10.°•':11::".'04,:::■•61.•''..•••17'...;:.1:.. f',f-''..::: .......,i,i...,... :,,,,,...:....:_,„:1,..:::,...::.4.0,,,,..-.....2...p. c.:-...::.....;•....--...;pl:....:..•:•,-:-•ts...'.......... :„...1.-.... .:,..:.;.•..,..:...<3...-;;:4 .,...i...::.',:•:.::..;•'•••.:;:,, .irl.:.-.:;'..•.*::j•-,-...•...:... ..:.:•;.;•.'.';•:•.:•:•.' 1::•:•...rA,.;•,741:•:, '',...,IP.k!..-:-:igfi..4:::gi,,:i ::7•:.:t::ik...;:r..v.•-wi:•...!•:•••‘:.:,• ?....:F:f:. :--:•,.,•-•4.:7:::1:1,...:;...-:.-.,".::-f ;:-.. -.4.:-...::.:::-.,,:•;.,:%. .11.. •:..--.-,, :.:::.;:-::--....z.:-. :;'•:'..'ezz:'...--.i...."&u: 9....7.....t.......•A ii,..0.1.1tAtittwitk. "jk.: .. .1"-... ' .. •. . . /...............:,...,;,., ,.:...: _.. .. ... ...... ..::..........,...,,.......:.„.„.... . ,,...;...:. 27:... ...,:...:......„.5..... ....:;.::,....!,:...e,.r..!.....%:.;....„1...?........:,............;.....kn.,..;: . .fil,e..,; :...:::.::....:........1:..1•:-...::::.: .:........ ...-.-......:::•. ,p4..j)7,•:.'.....,:..:...,•:.: • ,:-...;:::5:.., :.='!NV2:.?.;.1.7::'INI::•:..:P7e..7.. ::••14'.i:::%•11:::',."Alii4Vi..k.41;Eii;17...!f.:.f •...t....5''' • ..•.• ••-:: 46 ..:-.. . ..............::-...-,:...,•.:•.........:...;:.... .. .. :.-......-. ----. ..:::.....„..... ••.:. -;...;.,..;:.:....,?..,--;••::..-..,;:-•..-.c:.......„.,,.....- ......-, ....f. , .,. .. .:•.:...,.... .......,;.. ..::..:. ...,•• . ...-..........;....7.::;.....,41,....r.i.1:..4."...•:)::•.."•-•:.::-..:-...1-•-•-;!...'........:•••••••••::::;:. ''..-1-'•••••,':::.•: -..:•-.......!`........:: •••':::;:-.:::..ii-,11. •• ".‘Eite•k4,41:e....'-';':-.•;!''..-;;,t.f.•:!1'...:.'2!;:::•04V-Art•ALsritle:- ......;,,,:•:, - . • - ..• -•. - - • • .-..: • - •- . . . ....: •..:. .......::. •.:• - -:..:::-:.,•••Nr• ::.• -•:. 1'-.2 • : ••••:-..-.:•••• - -- •- :::: :-• - - - . .::•1,S.:-:...k. --'.'.:•::-•••:!'.;•...--:::::''....-7••... .-••'..:.:.:.:.:•••••■:.: .•-•:.......:'• :•.4q...:-..,•••::...::•%.:Je.,:::'::::• 5.•-•...":1:1•.:':::-"•0:'!!.:1;.• t;:..;:.;:•12.0:t.,•,klit'.'.:::kkreif•••At::.; ...•`•1:'...:'::::••:: . . ... . . . . .. ....- .. .•• ..r.4,.•• ... ;..:. ... . •...-..•::-:....:...:,‘.,: . ;....• ...:•:.. .., .• .., -....:..::-......i..z:.:4,.:.::•;•••:::....z:F:a.-;:,,,.. •.1.:.•'.........: : •••• ••:.•::::,.••!:,.. '.;.:••• •?...!:-.,:i.'..:f:4;,:•::,:•: iri.....-,. :.1:::)".:•.•::VE:'••`'•'*..4Y.;.qt§.}r-:';'&.:-...:-:■:;•!..:...!•:%...:;:k'...A.15:dpl.at..1. ":4•7•:`4....K. ••• : ... .• .. 7 - • . :. . ..":•..;.•• ."4.A...-.:..' .. .:. ••••:'...':.••• .:".•S' •:--......-...: .-:::::'..-:•.".:::•:1:•••••••:•; :i.-1:•::'::;',;;;•;-:'.•:••,..:g::1.:1.....z:•••:-.•:%:---. -•-•.:::.•---.'"••••!..-.!,:•:za..;:.:•:,.#F4...!..!.•-•,-.1'..:•!!..i::•Mr,•!:-.11:.:' .:;!:•.; .•:•.51,,,,L.ir.e.:it"1::.:1:1•2•.d.:,'.:::,:l..;.:,:.,•,•;•:'.:-&•;:fRr,,.4,:;,:!..-..::;:ii..;:f.littl.1:!:.,:i f.:•••,pp•••... .. . . . ... :.... :,:r' ..'.::::.•"..•.. ...• . - .• :--..• - •• -: .. -- .. . 1:-.•-••1::-.•:. .-: •..•.:- .:-.......:::;::":-...P.. ',I.....,....'.::C•ii'I'll:3,.....:..........1..;.• 1..:t .-••• ,.::}:..... .1.4:...:•:;• ....!::11::., ", ..7'.:1:"■•••,:...:.;711;. .,:7.....:.......P7...11!•::".71.i.:.tli;'77. ''.4'..1;:!1•Ar:t• :.4:.:::.'11::...::::-:.'7-c.:-.••••:::::::i;....r.:" t"4..;. ::<. ::,..::.,7,44:5,r.tezi::::::1,..,.. . ..-...::,.: ::!1:!;..!...:::::.;:k.::1. ...:,,,?..:::,d,...T.:70,;::::],iri-.....,,::..:::-.1::::-:.:::,.....:1:;:..,..:-..: . .: ,:,...1.,..:,,.:-?..,,,I.,;;.!....-..,....-,"1.„1,,,..,:it....:..,...::.,....• ... . ... :. . . .. . . .. ... .. .:• ... •.: . .-. .. :._. . .._........,.....:....„.„...,....:.„:-.::...,..„... -..,-. „ - . -.,,, :. T.,..,: ??,.. 4ii.v;.... .;,..!,:::..::::::.i::-...::,..:.,....,....,.....::,.7...v.,-;..::::::: :.::74,:... .11:,,,c.,4!72:!. ..k.g.i.7, z.":;.2,:,:::...--4v.,::... :‘:-,-,;:s...-.. ......4;'2V...iiRt.,:,:V:6Z1:5i; ,...•..,......-!•-• ••..............::::: ::::::.....:::::......2,„......,::.:....,.. ..;::::::::::: ...:..:......... :::. .:............ ::.:, ,..::......-,.....,t......:.......,...;:.,.•.:.....,,....:,,.....:.:.......,,.:.• .,.......„.....t.. ,:i.... .......:..g...i.:..,,,....,:::..:.. . .,...::•,..75•:.n.!:; :::;A::::::::,-!rit-7•:,::,-;,;::,.::.:•s:-:: ::Ai.-•-•%'.':.1::1:.:::.-.. .....•;.:. e;719:::-.:1 ;. .:.:. ..-::.,-;;;Itio.......:•,:4 ! :•;7.:•-•::;•?•••'::-:•••••:.:r1:11V-1;47.sAitrIZ::14.: 1 •ii*:••••fr:P"'*.'"'•• . .... ,..... .. . .. . .. .....s.!......:-: - . -..„.....-.:,.:..:...-•.::-::•,;.:::-.•:.7..:::-::::,..:•••!,. :.--,;"-.• - 4'.:4•,:::: ::::':•••.):i:gii.k ii7l!P!!.:f.'••.:-.7 4- • - •••:•'.7.41:.:...;1;•,...::::•A:..•:::,:4Lr';:g2.::::tiiiitik;;;:.;!qt?.::i2.41:ir.;;L' :li.4.44iilt•f-C.'•iie;:',4:7;:...i7er•;:::tit.. ::: :K5;•!::.:;,..."::■•••1:7•47■4;•F;..;.:4%1P;47:71! :7.4:•;C• •''-'*.r....:*:-••: . . ........ • • - -. .- ..,.:.•.•. .::• ';..-., - .: .• -•---..••-:::F•-::::.,-•:: .c•.::..:•,-..; :- ....••,......:.:..-..!...:,-.5:::'..!P1-.:•,„;.:::::.4.1,4 ••IP:,2:::■f••.■.'-i't.'•-‘•.•:•.* ■:•:::::-44t.:;:X4V .417..4.01114rg•ti:RiP' ..:1;:11.e.415.4!: :-A.V3?"'''..•;;:Tti::: •:ii:A:nt:4:71%,41::::::114.•......:...V.,4:1::::1:;,::41.'... •:-•••• .:•• ..1•:,.;•,.:::.i. d*,•,...„..,.........-. : " ••• "li - - . -- • •. ;.'....:••••-•:...-...-. '... :-..- - •:-.: -.....,•:- ..q.•:'•••: ';""• " ' . • '::::...•-•:.•:.,.."••••••.it.:::::"..s.'kjil•:•,-i'i.k;,:'§gi :.:4Ainikit:i?:•-' . ••'• .,• •- ... .•" . : •''&1:. • • . ••: :..;..: ':' ':.-..-::.•..." •-::"..;........'-:..;:::::1•,•••••:.,::::-.37:„:.:•.:`: •:' • ,...:.•:.:::.'.:,..,..1.'...!;.•:•f:.•i$:N:,:!•:,i.:::%••■;..g.:: :]....:i.F..:.•■.,,,!4:it.. ••-- .S....•••::: -41...."•••71'! :•!Ztreik7Iir4:••.•:: K:::.:t4:':::.2':!:.':::!..:•!!!;;:-••''•-"7"::!::.6..''•-' .s.:741 ',i'....::::-..........-.•.. iir4:17:!'.::!,::::•#•:•:t. .••:.:v ...„.....r : .-.-•. 4V.i.1::.:r•:••••::.:..•.-..:.1.-.•••••: ,•.-...."T ..4-.1jay.e., • IP:mg"- :e ; ..._... i • •••....4 • -• ••:.'- •''.1!;•••:•"..:41:00:1V::::•40:.;..1,.r.:Iti':.*C ..:.::;;Inf. ,'..r.e.I. :1:71' 1 ••:.-1..•:-':1:,...:•...........:(..........• 'I.::: -.....• -:..: -....1•:-..........-,:.....::::.•:•••.••:" . :........•.;.........•..;••• •••„.... ::::::.-.., :.....:•.•••-•.... ..-.:"'..i.!..1...:"..!..:•::::::'11.:::...':V:-..-!•;i!';:•••••:::..;...:ii.;:f.;.::::::•::;.::.....••:.•-•.•:;:-:•;•.:•...-.::•-•:•:.;.-!..§.•-:.:4:is..:.•,::-.4.4•••: .::::;.•:•-"•;......"•',....r....4.:F;:%147;dit..1 Ar-:•ili..,-.215P•417• 6:•:1':::%:,•'1.,!.1::■?&t.::.: i'''••0';''...- ••• •• •..• .• ••. • •' ••--.•- '--: ••:•-•-•••••-.:,•": .•'•:.:.:•::••:':;:::':-',"'.•••••••••.■:-•.:.•--:':','••••:::'.-''.••••:-:'•....:•''•-:''.',..,.. .•••••f•'z 1-4,•,:if,0.;.12';•?fv:7e:'!".4 intAgii.W. - 4.97. •!•.;:,p..:01:".:pr:•:-.1te•Irr!.: ' .. 15.4.....•;.••••Pp.....1.• . - vl.:1:11•7;4:11.4titi.V.:•:.".1:1;liI:.'...?:::;:•:::,t.:...:....4.,,,•. .: •...,..p.:....-:••::-..........-.:-• :::. :... .. :.:-....• ... •...::•,,........,:...•„•.;.-,.......;;;;.:•::•;;:,-::: '..,•••.....•-...•. P•:.::::!:•.i.!::::...........:••:.•;,•:.4..:::;Z".0:.1.::::,.:ti::%!;c:•";;;::.:•;*•;:t:•:..it„2::,.::..::::::•%•.•:;64.i.:::iy?.•:1:::;A::0:4;r:....:;141%147,v4.144_01:::: ,,:,.. . -2..t......i.:•:::..&•:rv:P-....:t..":-,•-1:::,:•,..P:•:!•05;41: P- O .. .. . -. :. .. -'.1.- •• - • • .... ..•. .., . ....f.-...!.::::.....-:-:••::-..'............:..-."........%;•4:7:-..:-. -.:-..':'.•-:-..:-:•:.P.:!-:•::::1-i"....:•.,-:71-r:::•:.;7-•:::•%::•.::.:-:!....1:1::;.A,..,•;77)...e.i.:?,5:t'.2f1:'- -.:::....1:•!:::,•.iiXr•:•7"''''...•::•:'::: :•••••::,'gi.::'::'t.'...•i;!:. ::)Y7:27. ..:1•;•.P...r.,...:2:.,::•...-••._:1•:.-•••:.7457,;•‘:::::-,7..-::Y:::::•Zi•:;;;;..,3)'IF!: ;,.,it.40t;ir•A:biell'.4:&e",,:',•••;.'..5..".,....:4-...-^r4:4,4.: -.2K *::•••:::••4:1••ci?::::•::: M _:`••.r.•••'"..,.....::::.',.'"-• „....... -••• rt.•.•;.ttirr:::. • .n- '........:.•-•::......:--..,..-:,:. ,72,!: ;:-.41411:;;;;:i':,:e ::::::!...,1••••;...:-.:::.::••••.. . . . '... . .. .'.7..' '.:':'... • .... . .:'..:: :.....:e.......:.:..'"? ...' ..: ...:' '. ;■1:6:t•i•!::::'::....:±:.r.i'!:::'::::i4:14:',N..!'.......14:::..''.'. ...%,..k.''.4..;:„.•-,.1-,:li-.;:.1.z...:;:f:::'.• ,:,:,::•.••••:..-•,:•,!.17•.:,!.1.t.-•::,..:•:-...::•;:•.:.....2%.ii...: it*::.!::ii7!.41:31.1.R. 1. :::':X":-.tjg.17. -.Ri7q..4P4i34r''1.::. - , ., ' -I. " •••■••'...p.,;;. . ' '.!•::::: ..; .....-... .;::::••••::.:,.:.•.:::;.:::.:;::::•%:::..1•.:'.:::.:.i:!...,.. ...:.....'....::-,'........"."F:11:'''..:.::•....:••.:... •:•-:%.. ‘ .:; ,- '; :.::.•:.:Yi.....,,::4'.!"....,..... •-•:..-••■rk,:.•.:,..1•::. :•:•1•':••:••:,..;•.-4:4-1•1:%;iIgr-: :• ..1:4:, .$J-A4c.:.'•-••• ,-..-:: - ...::::::P:11:: :•-•-•:::41 . ••. •-.7...•.. .:".1....:ii:!::1:.:.;:-:'!':::•:::•••:: .... . . . .. krk54::94::::!:.-i:4•••:;•.:•: :::::::.•:44-:,:741:4;,=-- • '-• ••• "" • " " " - • 1.:fr•:::::k..ri....:•••••••::'E.:•. . • • ••+• .:!.... •..1 :::::: :'54::.:L-10:..:.• • ..11%. .,,,,• -• ;1:::r VA/•::'14211•:*.:'..:•;'. :1Y::-'::-' *".ilki4- - . . ., ''...""..•'.k....,. 4.4:.'!.:•!.....t.1:::•:111.!::".•::::H:•.: 3 ....--1.,....:.::(1.)::::•;:f.•::•- - ...,..,...:..„........,:...„.::.....,::,..vA...,,,,„:„.,:‘,,:i.1,:: -.:. . :...x,,,.... .,.,:.%,...0.7.,.::,-:::::::,::::::,.:...4....i2.,:oh.,,,.::.,:k.:,:y..•. ..:;:...:0,........:::: .,...4:9.,.,.:..f2:::.:5,., , mr-:. • .f..;-...•.g..1:..,•;',.!....v.---7•;••:-...,:,....e):. :-,. . . ...,'.,-.::..:.::::........:...:.,....,::::::..,:•:.- .• : ,..?..-::-.::-:•:..::Art.iti.:::-.......-,1-. •::- -.':::::.!..e:LY;5•.,1t-Es&t: ::44:F::•••-::•',•!!,„,itIr..4i:if•A!4t :' :1:2.:i.:4::::::-::?::,1%.:,..,:.:::::..4.:1E1;::-ZT' ': .:,-::d.',...: --,-...!...„, ..:;....„,11...„.„..,...i,...„....4!,•:„.I.,,V•!...,::4•?....,..:.........."-.: .•''-r•°'-•Yr<'••:•-7".:'••.. ..., .. -• ' '• --•i•••••••";:.4:•••:'::i!..V•4':."."•"*„ ..".•••••"....'....iNIC.4 ;I, : '....g•••N.N.•'411';1••••.""•*4•,:;•..1**•:.'''''•••••'-''..., •••J•',.....-.‘.....":: '...."`'..•':"•.•-•:-..•:•.:.•••••:::-I•. .f.i::.ii::.:`1.54..4r,;.:t..!•:?.,:•!.::•!:•:•:-..••••..:::::":•Jc:...1- . .t.....'.:k.:::•:::1'401g:' :.'- ' ''•-• -4 C••••**'•*•44.****4.4•••4'.*:*.!'"'•••!...***•••:***Ein'T4.0.•:!'..% t• 4.''.•kii:::7:Z.:"..r.1:4::1:244'.":*••******* " • .. *...I...2'..';...•'••.-**-: ••%....,:: :g•;:......d.4:41,141M51.4; :-7,‘,:e'.":'::•"•••:::::':::.:-';:-:.:!:::•,:i•:.....r::':::':!:::7.:) ... ' .:1; :: 1"....s......IFT:1:::V:i4iliff:"•.:,_; iiif.,:41: •:: :4:.":-,liti!.!:::E:14::.. ;;;W::::.:.:F.4!.:•67.::.•,..-.;.•.:1::::-.•••41••••:'.:.:„...:.:.....:....„,f•Z,.7.•:•...... •-.,•,:•. ..7i:4••:::?;•i'i:'-'2f1•051r484;;;05•4:4iAli4IPMe:%.. 11:019"5-':":'...:••:..• :•"...ri•;:":..•i••••••.-..L..i:::::::•'.:..•......•• •;••••••••:*;"•':Y.:•••..'''E..7'.1.1• 1•••'.* •••:•!..!..::::::•••••••••.•.••••••••!:.!:•;'''.:•••.ii•Alig..„.. !•:*•. ••••••• ....4:5...,y. -'.....-.--: --:-,::.,,::•,-.-,-„,',.••,,......„:•.,.... ..4., ....,1,,,....??............-. •:••. • ". :zaelk•or-.:A:-...tryvid:k.,---;:.:---:." •:•:--:,.-.::::.-,:i.: ::,- ....1,-,...,-,..•••••:,.....,,,,..:,•7,-.....-„-.... , - - - . . . ...... .....'4:-...i4...••;:•:::::::::-...-"•-•:•:;........:!..g- --- - 1/2..z.-..,.•.•••,.-.. - /.•,.: .4.-,............. .-•'• •:..-.:-• . . . -,-.:. .-• ........... • •....-41iiti...........::,........-:.,..:-.- z....„. .,. ....,,,„,,....-:;:......• 1".:•;':: ::.,::- .:•-•:. 54'...•,`..-7---::.•...:;-:••::'-:-.;...:--.:::.:..'::.,...'..;;;.-.:::.-..,- ......;...;::::...:T.-:;.:.:1-z:....-•-H..,•--..•- •-.. -. - . i t:1•5,,,Th---• ,.-- •-, .. :•':',....•••-•---:-...•••.....,••••••••• ....,..•.•-•••:-.......1...;..f...,:•••nr....'17•'.••-••-••• ;$-- „ft:. •••...-..:•-.......r..-1.:•.......*:;•• 5.. '4..'•• 24., „••••:.:;T:::.44%.:::--:-.-" .. 7.*/....1 • . •• ..4-...-...,...p.P0T.15:e4,•••:••••:!..A. ....-1.1.::!••;:i.::,-, - , • '..'••'.' P....'-'••-•••''.......!......--•:.t.i1.12:,•::i.....rPPIZ..:,..',..;':•:7*.i...14•1•• :".•"•-••1.•••••••••••• !..;..':•.:5: ?0.::::$16:iPia:•!."1 -•::.; li4! ?..4ti:::4::.41).:,111111::;:i::.. : 141:: ; : fg•::.::. ....".?.4:::::: :::::::r.:;;;:1?;:•:.!5::::::'-:"IL:14.:::' 4.,-f-' P.-'•:••••'.."...,1•••••!1•2.-:•t:4%--.-•.P.-Pt•••,•••••pi,••••i:**:::.••-,P,•••••••PP.P..P.Ppp...••- : .,••::- ,.r'.1:. P:•:pp:• •:.p......•-•:-...:•,..P.:::•;•P,•''..i,..•••••••••s.;;;;.••ppi • •44.••••:,:.. '•'•:•••*.i..047..•-•;•.,.••*•:`•••:•..*47;,••'••:::••....(•:.••••::'..... ••:•••••:4:*•:::::.-:...':' .. .4.14FA .. „4.1:••441,::: :::•• •• :•:'..::40.fte;.;.1 1-"•--- ..S''.4'''.:. '.3-r.'"O''-.;:...:?:;:e'T•:::..0:..g:!".•:•;4 •L''... " '.. '. , • .4...1•:•;•:••••7:•••••••;Ai..2*••••4:...•••••444...:;.:21:j'.. ..„•„•::• :',.2i.:1•1,44.-.:-..;:***T•••V:•„5:'.• 4.• 'F'. .?;:.....::•.i:•....-: :-...1".iy - ' ' -.1r:• •••••;:.0 .:: ;;:.•ki.. .:..::.'::::- .. ..:....,,. :..• • •.- ..:.::•.,•,•::::::::..:.•::-..-:- . -.- -,-••-•,•-ni..•-.: . •'..,....--4.4•:••1::.:41.,1•7:-:9.'.4r:147.1tIgir:;;Z:45:.;.:tr-r...:•,:-'.."- .. ',...**.''.•'.'•-.....""•.••r•r' .. ....-••'.l•:.•••..•,...':..... :"."'..::••,,:„.:•;::::'.. ....::""".:*•;•:;••••••••3rP•f::•" •':•'••••****'••••".. •••••-. -•'•:.•.•:]..1'..;.•''•.,..!"......-•::: :::".••••.;:.4.'"'"- i.i.:„., i•,,,.•".: --•:'''•••:`:.:.4,..... •••••i' •I.•!.. •••_•p.:..iair.',.111:1;" - • 1• '•'.. •••;:**•:-.'.::::• .....-:......• •'• ••'••• •....:• •:' • •-• .......fii?..1":•?"..',....31:;••1:;•:::... •:.::::.... ... :..:.......::••••••,.....:".:"....,.....::::Z'••-•••••..„,_ -••••4"?.!" ••*-""''':;!.":.':0341,••• ir,!.:Ei....3.A. 1-41':•;:•••••,.:ii:C..e.iCip.'•%.'.:•:i;••.•.r•NrS1.4,-, .I ,,,,..... .....p:,........,, .,..,...,..,. ...... .:.. .. . „... Fp:••• '' •:"'' - -.........."".• ..g - ••'• lit .4i5.•'*•1:••:::::•.•:•••••••••PIPP.P.'•••••:::*•:P".•••.•::::••••••••••%,•'•;•:•••••••••• ••.•••••P.:•.::•:...4....itio: P.Pi :::-...: *r.. :.,:.••-::•••;..^..0.4,0.,•••• .„.710„..I. ....!:!... i:,;.:;•-...7:-....;•::::-...;:;::,:: ,..,....;.. ...:.' .-.s..1f:kkg.ko•III, Avg•..b..14;n:::;:i.:::,: •- .•',. -..f..;;;,..f...A....„:.;:s;::•,::::::..-:•: . .....:::!:!.:j.n:....;."7"..., ....:.......:V.,:-.":.••••........,..............:•-•-.'....... ....i-1::!.....:Z:''...i....Q.:t!,11Z0f.:g3 ,-....-•; 1:411 .:4?..!....' .. ....,.,,„•,".„;.:.szi.:::.1---.. !:......:...!.:1.I.v. ::".t....:::•,..7: ••••••••••:;::.lig::•.:•••!•....-..........-i'....?....•::::....".•••':-.....:.:•:.-. ....--n•-f. g.....-5:414:.,:;.4::::::::::,•:,1-0.4.1ii;;-;...-r. ,. ,..,-,4- 0‘.:0V- .%••-••',1a:•:-;:. :'" .::...),.-;,;•.--:*•:,;.;,;je..`fic,41, •4•17'11::-,:ittl ''''''''''•••:'''..".'.5-3•70;.W.V.itN.0; 7tiltlite*N.!;;;.N44.114i0Alk.::::i .,...,. ':::•it$:•.411,1! .:7'.::c•.:11. :......:,..... r ......1; -.. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .... ....... . .. . . . . . .. ..„... . . . .. .. . . .. . .:..: .. ....... .. . •• • •• •-- • ••- ••• • - '...4.......- ::::.......-•;:::,-...!.............:-......:.-..; ..:.,.•-•.:: „....„....„.....-........„.„:„.:.............„.....„..:,.........,:.,:::::...... ....... . ... :,. „....; F.::•-•::-.6$.4 .... .:• ..- .• • : :-siiii**7:.•:•..-....:-...',.■••11‘:-.:'..i.110.•:.•'": •"5.'•,:•• •"2:::.:::--•:•:''-.;:'••••••••:;::•.: ::': .,••. .•:. •„.•;', .4?..41% -•. .„........,,,,,„• ,.,, ..::. ...... ............. .. .. . •: .......:„........ .. . ..:. . .:..„. ,..........:......,..„...,,,,. ......:4...c..,.,....,..„.......:...-.... ,-... ..........„.,.,,, . ..; -!...-..an. .. . : ,......4.... ...k1.---1.,.:7.::.:-...-:::::::::,..::::±r.:::::..;::...-:.- • ...-N.......,.dArliiiy,....'1.::::..1.y.44.1:::::.-4-..:::Vo.:;.....it.1.-.:.... -.,...-.. 4:-.Ff!.-':1.:::.F.:C.?%::*;:,..;;;.r.-.1'F f.'....:.1'.'....-_.e.:,---,,,:•,::• ..- ..... ............0 N'............::::1".•4'.' ..:-77:7' -'..-:.. , '. • -1.•. ' • ..-.:..,.;f:s..i.::::•': .' •.:.:•"::...!.. r:'.1 ..•:..'...::!;•■••'.:;•• •••:;.•:••.:::•.•'''..::•.':-:'.:.• .....•c;.;,•••1•:....-•:.:!: :%:P;;‘•:•;?:•2',":$1:::.:;:!:ii4:••• '•. :•7.:•:..,': • ' . . !,;• el•:":'1•;-.1;5111 ....lek: :::::•-••••:•-''':••r'!•1.•:.••::1:4717.`:.. iii;i1; :li.:,:::::/!..fift)(':•.!:.Q.:4'.;:Tic:',..1::;'••1411.1••••• 1 1*.Jh..:.,,:u,...i..•!.'•:,..„..,....,•,.:,.L....•-.. . . .......- Itt.........- .- : .-. •.---...F..••••••..........::''.L-: :•• •-•:'-.•-•:....',:.. .F '„••.'..........io...„..., m•r..47.:1.•;.-.1!,#•••:-.:01.1t ..•••:is. I.4fi.....;;;.. „.•-•- • :$1.P: • ..,A., „....,......, ...<:••••:',441A-r-,,r; :■■••.:,.•;":T•.i:•:.A' ...%4.'i ...'':"..."..1...!:!.......:'-i:: i.: • ..• • 1 •. .• • . • •• • - ........ .. " %:•••.,.. :.*-•..•..e.':-.. .:. • ''". . , .-' ' .•"..../'..;:.;:...:-'P'-±-74i•':•;4.;.:•:::'4:".7 * ii- ::.).''7;1:jou: •.. •:::.•r.::..1'...:•%:;,:v.:!::•::::-'.1!•::0!1•4.,Itiiiiii./....txt;•; .: -.:......„,..,,,?...:.•-••••:•••r•.•.=-4.Aeltr.S: • 'D p.• F-1 *2 • 'T .111: .-111: ....,,Y..:'........122,:%.;.. . .'-' . ....."...'..: '''''. .. -••••••:-...:.:•:, ;-... '•"4.4 •, '.• . .••- ::.1....,••1:';::.1:. 41;.••.•-.4*--4....':. .::::31.:i'.;?' . ' :''''It3•442":".. '::' !...!•tVia :r.. .7....'....'"I!!.1 4. . .. !*44., .1„,.••--,, ris :- ..• .1.•••• --.••.... '...' • • . . ... .."..• . Ira- •:•-•--.•..:••---- . •'.1. --e--.....:-.....::;-':..:-'P- -----7-7-• - .. • - • •:• . ... . ... .. . . .. . ..... ..... • • g - :::::-.-,....:."--,:.::::....-t...,'„......:•.::;;..•.:::::-..5■1;E:if.;;;::'•;•-:1:.::.:,;.......:••:".'.::::::',1..1;•?" •:**. ••12111.■••Fe.:',7 .•• '.-• --:. - •"-'•'• .: ..• ••,-• •:,.•:'••.::::•••:•••'' '' ''.. ..:...•'•:::::,i.'..."...:: :.;;•.'''••-...•::•'•'•;•:46iN:.-,triai"..;.454.:::::::: . ::'7.,17C•••••''...'--• .•-:, . ..•:•: ..-.:.'...i.1.1:./ ;;;;;;. ,•Z; _ .._.....,1.?: ....4.4•••!.:4.11;...i ''''''"'" .,;..;;:ri2;;;;.::.;;E:".:::i:".':.rr:1" ..1?...111111:1=2,,j'.:!..",!:,:-.1.F.:.!" •. ._.'"..;:•lf:2;:i$ ...!:7;-•:• .!••• :44,::Aik117.:•:'.',.:".:.:••,•!6.5:;:t5}.^t;•••!-•'. • •••.17:trAfg J■ii:jorrz'" .....j.,..w.-.. i'..Z.••■.g.:Ail?..11:".4/: :- 1" *• in::.:."•.:IhitRat:.1:tr.* :, •••■•;,:• , •,..)i„,_„:t,„...,,,,,,....:--"•).1,..-•:••. -.....1. , '„'••, ,,....: -" ...1.!"•--.. ..--...,:•,!N,: • .......:041.1.10:.: ..)):Tr... ..... 1.11.•••1.e.• "'.....-.•'...., . ......_...,*,..,„„,„.„-....„.......... ..,„-•11; :f•Sti.1.4.7.. ,IM -• . .- . . . - --.,11,:.•K•i,••-,,,:se:: ,t..---, - ---:......)...,... .. • „„,.. ....... :.....,,,..,...„....„.„:,:sii•Fr .,..•,:'••••icat....;.0.gtii•qtrx:ra7.---1:::::....z.;.„p,:.. ,%rg.4 ,i-;':?;:.-7•.::,..","... .fr-:,-.:-:.-:-..,....,..1:7:A.::::,..,.....4...,1:.,,,:-...,:::.:::t:v ... ..-...-.....)..:•::r.,AI, • .. •4.1.71251:. ••„...•:,,,,,....r...p.„1,,„...., ::::G. ....,,..-•-•:;::::-.4:49:::....'1. . .1 -.;:.."- - _ • • ___,......",)or.--",__----..:0°I, 7-,,..„..........,.....-,-...- .......7!:::7:77::::-:::).: 7::::;:::,:: ::.;'.:.- • .. .•24.r.:....:7-•:...;.•-, : :: ::.:•-,i.%;:4•41;y:4.-.'..4",?....::.:A:;':-:::;;;:-;.."•;4•":0:1:r :4::::4,.......:'.4.:**..• -.••'•••••2:*:••• . , , -... ••••• F.Fil:',;:a..4::::::,,..i.f..:.0:::::::Y:'4Zr'f,L; :...::"..ii.r.1'...:M.',....:,?•Fr4:•::7.4:74•13.;:: M ...4.:%••.;:*••4••••2:4:J.•::21.H... •- :. ...:,;.;::::"'•-:?":'..4.4.4f,1..2•••,F*1; :::::::;•4::••- . :.$271.•::.•,:::::'1:2: , . 2„.- . •.•4,,...-I'4;"....''';'44x••11r/ii...r,:_iii"_,I'ir::!!.1't. ..„: ..............:.1_,...:.;.+1,..;,1,...1.;.1..........'...,::'1.74**c.1..17•-•-.•.'L. '"i' ..1,....1.1.1.1'1,...,;:•....,...,,,!1•1..,!...!:.:,..j...i.-...;....::::,.1..;,;.:.••1..:..::'.."...'11-1'.1"....:::.,-.......1......;:....:.........1.1........:'...:‘... .... :'!.%.•-:.•••:•:.•-•:,.--•r•'... *••••••:-..........::::;;;;-r.;.:fft r•-•..:.::::.i. ...':-.r.A:. 't-.g.:....':-••ikti'i: .; :4- - - - -.)....4:-.:..s.,......:•1::..--,................. :.......f...,..... .-.!....-i••:- .......c..i•••-- - - . . ... •- Ter,: :44- :-.:: ,...:;r4VArg...A:1r:-..'• -- 31,1;',-r-- ,•.,.•:-:: • ,...,.. . . •• •-1.41::::-.,..t...,-'•-•-.-1 • .. .- .-,-- • •••,...•••::::::%-..;;;?!.:4-:.?-41.011:. . i::.:4•11:07.:Ti4; .,,,ii :.;:.:•...;-L.,,'•..4.: . • - • . • - • • . ••••••-•--.--" !..:45'...-'.::::17. 7]:..71:::;;;;.f.'t:r.:..:L::;,.::-...,-?--:z.:--:.......,.. 4......1.2s:1 ...:v.-..,: ;;;.:.,...;.:2 ,i.:.' 6gK•V:4!.....:;,..... 4*0:....tA 'I. -.:.:A::.r,--.1-4-..: •-'---•••;: 1 .„...:,... ......1-2.11;.,.... ...i•I';•:.0.;' 1.:.!:,i ..; -i' :1'.r..::::::.:5;.74....*::!•-rf':.----- -§.....-••,......-.....:-.2-.......1/2., ... . . -----7. ..., .1;"--..!e::r. :...7.1t'::::?-::::.•--- ---..i.i....7.: •-• ''..i•.,ER......t.......it • • •....il ..... ---;-;-11., .:-....-4:;,...!-',.....,...,,: :. ., - ::•••-d:-.,..,... .41.**14Te.:..,,e,,-:. ..,..,....:-..........),,,,,,,,,......„:"..„.....::...,,..,e....g.A:y: ""*....*:;:'4"-..„1",........ .... .' . :;:t.....:::::;;:t'':::.::'•:F.:-..•::: ...4;,,::-::::;;.. ..: -:.;..7.::-!:.i,•...i...-•.:!.'!.:!:•..":1tr i 1 :11;11, ";..'..;s5:::%.!..., '"::::.C.:•::::.:::„.01'.;:.•-i•:::1,41;5:••,.,.0•:;•••••;r:.:. ii.„..i-i'••••="'••1:f . ....::::24.,:x4.... ...•....„..,...-:::•:••• l'... ::•.:.•::. '••.:.ef,ir)... ,.. :...n.• -11;?.*:..i.rg: 3:1.4A.'7.ti4i:4:001..;:i4.11::*?•:::"''.4•1''SP::::0' •••••••• •"...*:'•••-',.."'.•:•;!•*:-::5•.....:ii•'.:,•0:'••.."'•'•:•:.'••••••••!.....,,,.....: •••••.::•''';'" ''.........r:r.:: .............,:::•.,....;,"::.,.::'*.-• • ...:-.- : • ?:•11..:.:: •d-. 11.'..•i.,ii,i, ..:-..b. ...., .. .....-i,tk.,:::::,j,.........).E . ..4: tx.1:„;„....:0.„::.-";..-....,4!•,.i.:. .,.,....0i ...z.r,.....:* •:,,,,.",..,:‘,...,I;".,:::1 0, . :.:!i,•;.k5:::::7.3.711..-.'•'.....1:::...1;:.'1Z! i.,,':::••''...::::54,...."..r!:.;:t.::"..:".•!!:::::*•.•'....t.......,-,;:i.•i•''''.....::::?.....'•;1•:::...;......:iiic,''..f..4,,,,• .•:;.,,..... ....,• ..43,.:'''.,,,I:i.4::',7;;;;;11..":::''.....":27..-•'';'...':r.4.::::-...i......;•*"..!•47.....;;;:i.:',?...:^"....!!',,i:•:".•••:*:::""• ••,•••••!... IT t-%::'%. ......... . :. .....4..•it- .. Y I j•ti••.1...i.:.:..:::••••1..k:.?4-:,......F.:.:.:...:::::::.rf ..,.:.-7.-..?...-4,--.:.-r..':-.;:.::::..... ..N.!:•-•:;.....-.,..:..:..:.....-:-.......-,-!....:7......-1. .,.:c...-::'..1:-...ei: ,:•1;..c......4.-•,..-s-R...,...,?=5,1:::;.4.-;-:::.c...i.4:.::----.....:.m.fi..7.5 ,1...-; 11' 1 I i u ••:-•?::.•::::1' • •°:.: :A. --.77:• :--J.:"::.i"-•T..,•.-:..-.:.:.....- :•::-.;;:..-:,:•.1*•• :., --....,.:,::'.P.,. :p:-.'.:•• r.::: :.py.;,.'.•-:.....:,::f:::-•:-......•-.:!..;:p•-•,••--..::.:.:•.',..1.34.V..:::-,:;:i0.•::i7.r:••%;•::....7::..::•'.4:17::,.;!..1.7•••• .:•'..;.••::.4.•:•:PPi•,::............:'•••••••!•:',..:Pip:::.....'.-4:',...,';PPP.''.•:::.....'•••••.•••••••••••......,...•••ppp•-.pp: •-••.p..•.•,-• pp,......,.,.. ..,..}«,75,7;44......•.....:5..,:i.....-...• • ... ....',..? it ' • Eh It 1..,:%!:.:;!..1. :A17.:•'..':-:'''•!.'.• :......... .......:-......: '...'••••:••.:• -.-.":' ...• :-:-::-... •::.4;::•-::::::•:;•.':•;•••1!::-• •7•::::•i•-::::•iiirf A.i:•:,::::-••ArlsIc7.:;:.'-':•'''••••'::::.?.••••••;:-'•••••!'•,!';•rai:IF,A.'•._ ''......1••••,..4.::.....'•."..IF'••••••7!..".!..l'i•jn...V.S:••Air',..,...V.:9?Z•••.:'Z',..ib.,"•';'17,7 ,'.:•.1......!--...';',.. 1:..: ..4i....j.i"!:: ::::.:',..:::..:i'•::.... . .. •..::..: , Al; ,.:, ...!fj...4.;i....„..:.:,.........,...i:l...?..••.-;.::........-....,.......-;:.,4.4:::........,„..4.;2:•:•:::•i•rizgokt=:•....:;- :!1.'il4;• e';'46•B;j:•;:::::,:•■•••E'-!.'-•-•••••:-.....;•••CI:"I.:;•::•;••••.:;:••....•:!••,:1;:i•-••••:• ...;•.j;.•:••1••k.6,,,,,t• :`:'..• '--' - ".!......1"...1...:"..." :!....,'"Iii.ii.':'•••••.::::•rMi;r147.".•-•:',c..:::?•••::1••"4",•:•"•"....:••••1:04•1•?.•21.,:e .. i:• tif.i.l.„, .--... 7:::.•;;;. ,,,•••••••••:••,•?;-::::::,:...:.;.:::::.:..i.:...;:i".:••:5: .:.:::...:.:::.X•i•:A::!:::: ::iii•a•:::.!:::4:4141;i'eq:::7%•;',:eli4454.4in .414....49•Ve! .1... -••.:": •'..•••7:;';''1::-•••••'s• -:-' •.•" .. ' •'''-'''F":•'• fill4C14itir#41.Vg.-,..:: 4r• .. -,1■44%::4'. ••••..•••' •-•••••' .`.".1.--•••,"'• •••••••ut•'•••••.•••:' •'•••••'":"!7:!:::"'•."'''..... ,•-•.•.•:.7.1"•••,4 .. .1:7....,••:"....;••••'•' ""''.."*"'•""j:"1.7';' 14,,t.:1:::55'. :::•:.::::::.:.;••••::::%::::::!:::•••A':•:?1:1.'t1 . 4..."1 .:9071i,:•:::if, R;i.:...!.:,•:„•,•,::!;,:,.....,,,L,.....4:z't.i ,•:.••'""..."ri.:Itgairtisiiipai. estoigi i.r..*•Aindel: -:•7,0•!',..00::,... • ••••"....P.:**•••..7.H•pl it.i..i ti . . . ...,,- IR•:-•jii.ififfl.:.,ifue.:442:44; " 7.•••••irp, PAPpp;;;•••••'•;=•••1•P.PtrIP,PJ• • ;.. - • ;.0„ . •di,;:7.:ip.":. ••:!: ::. -::. . .PM1..:r••4•:::±P.P4Pppk.,,,. _ . •••• tki 1::.siii:lioi.s..0i71.....V.1, 1417.,,...-•.:T::::: :1:7:-.:i.•-f;:s!f.:3:-••-.i.v.,:. : :::g.ft -It,':.,vlitN. -,-16•-•,..•:.,.i,:: •lh,.!:::,-,-,,.:r:?•?:v::::1;-4-., ::,.....,,.....,„4.1,...,),,,:•...........„,..........."- ..". - • - • .,,- .J.,,,,,,-7,),,,,,i.„4440.:Iiii,),.....-..4„,„.„.„., ::.:::: :..c.....:•-'•--:TtL!,...,-.44fa ...12,•„:.:?::,7••:J: 7' -,6•1' -.i:i!it,Itkl:15iltf7;::‘,7-7..-:: ,-......-.. . ;; ::."...F.`,4t:.3S.100.Z.,..:::::::im:::.i-;..,.... :11:10:.;`.. . . „. --._Te_,_'-n :-......,..d...ii.4.iiiic.....,.......,..!.:-........'"..-.--- P. ••-.' :•••-.1''... . :4•Mii717.1..4.:r..;4::•....:r•• ::...:-.:',...•;.:.:7;:::::• .•..'1:::::.:;;;••::.%%::.:-: :7°.12•1.:•:1;:;::: !,,,:_:•.* lEof‘,,Q,Aa,Nrifk:10.:PAlitir.Alitt0:14.•;'•.P= , .-,.....:..,•;;;..f:::::...:..-:::■••:....4, 5' .'44.5kkir.,14...,,., , '':;Llit.:',':::: :ii:r..:•4"!...:....::::::r•r :'1•••:.:..‘•',..1: :'%•*;• ::-'7•::'"•• .-1.14i*k..,riiii'1'....::::'•???1Vg•wi ......:4•444,ilittikj.,..4. .•••1.".'0.:::!.;::4) .‘:,*;::".••"•,:::••••., ..-:. „... - ...•......:. ........4..........4... .. ,, .. ... : - ..- ••••-.„......-oilliiiiif•Mji.. .• ......„....-.'•....".'•.:.:!4""••••••'••Z1' ,... _.. • -•••-, :<..1.•.:,:ty g.....,: r'.F".z.:•.!:,.4.•:;;;;.: Vi..-:0-..7:::'. .11:::i7.72;7,it:1::i."1...k?::'!•!•':••••,'!...::::: :.:47:117:i"--7t.'•::: :::.:-•::::::."-'.":. -::..0.4.:.,:t'i;;.•*.;." 1:• .........:........:....:.14,..:,..,.....,..„...:,.:;,..... ;:-.....:„...4:::::::$'..-::•;;:,e':.i'•,--.,:..::e;•%:.--:•5.;:04:-•-•''''••- 1, ....... •- - - :..11:'''Xi . . .":•:".•:ltr2"'!;:-:I4-"`..:5:".1.1.1Z4tki...;:::: :'',Ii.::1.r.:10.•; 4•:•4f."::•r•'•••:•.':::-'•••' ...:........,••1:-...,..: `•'•-•.VPV.3011111.,.ifi::-.0.:1'..;• : e;H•A•.•':5PP. - •'-`;L4. .:.--.44,...;-:::•• . ... r.ft "'•••••: r".k 40.4.,A. 4.,T..,=AP-'-'" 4....:::::•.:::;;;.:.!:::,F,'::::ei.ill.tie.;::'--Ti"A. ' ....„:. :..9.;.::: :.::: .-......... ''...-'=-F 10,7,--P -.....1.!:.-1 .:... -•:•i•-•::;:•-:.4: 1:s;,:,-,,p,11::..t1 . , . •• '*'' .'"'"1 p ,,. ....:':-.::::,.,;••••::::i::,1k..r;;t7;:irg....:!::::,..2.::.-.....-..„:..;4:-.;: kpritrIlt!:•.: ::: ::.•:•1,41:.,,erADihn:',•'....,i' riPiifi..:7.-:• ::•%-:•:.:.•:-- _, oiet.--•::: ••:,... , .•:::::....( - •-...s.•'-'K. ::: PP:::..-. • • • •.. .....• •-• -- .P.-, '., ..: P.. •'• •,......P•pfp...ppp,p,,,, :1".;;::..:1:.:.;•••.'.4:::::Ji...4.41444:::i..-7:i.:::!•:;I:...:'..::::.,:ili:ilEi.:.::::;:::':;.•:::1:::f.;.f.::::•:•:•;::::.::-.::::-•:;..4::,:::2:...";:iiikA.7]:::;:k...tg.60.$40. • •_,_'•i...:2L-t••'.;'. •C:::.:i.:::Qiilar:/;'rk:"r:$ *III-'••• ".•P •••::-..-•.•:-.:•'-'s: ....1,14%200...." - - --.0557':"••••p:'•:1•.....""''N!t••!-:. • "*"..;-•••••PP...:.••***-•--"*...:•01.F.134 p...g..fr'iii.r.-'1.i..*r•-**';q•• •."4";•'•'••4, ..1 . • • ..". - P'"P . . . ..p ..:...::::;• ...f.:•-•..1.--1:ii::::!..,--'•iW..7,•••i•I'.:: ::::.'..-'4:*.i.f.^,..;.";Z1117...:?. ...1.1':•7:tgisl-.!:;:::......Z:'........:.•!:.::'.;:;: j•••.:1••••. :6;z•Ir.•::.;4:5!";:t464,.:!,:':;:, . ::::: ..)'.1•F4.1.5.... ..'......: '..0':::41:4:?..1.q...::.:;!!:'... .?::.:••••• ,. ..:::..- Ill. .. . ...-'•••••:.-...7.1*Cti .....!.....::.:;:lgt..:......1:•.::i•••:-.....,::5::::::::•;•::::•:•;:•,....,....:." ..1 - ..,..ii,:_,...:..-...,.. . .........::::,......::::....7.:;:,..,:-.-,,, :...:'31:::•:::;•-•.',':: :,5....-.44.•.• •••••...:' :•-.::- .:. „- .......: c- ::-...--.-.T4i:..:••.0,:::•A ..':-....;.?:•,.-....::i..f.'"::. .;,!.:-!:;•:.1-;:...:••••:.....:Fgr::-...-:::'!.:.i.71:ig.:,,'-.:71::::,...••••;..:::.r;o:•!..k:.;:Z::•!•.•:::;C•.•:•.•.:::...•i'...:1•....!..i...:-..:-.• ::...:. ,:,-.:-..... ..;....-.4f. , :::;•„::*:4:: : .. :..,1,;11:::i.:::::,. , __1•;,•kii.„,:*. .......e„.„. ..„,;....:...:_::.::...:..,,...,- ,....:::::-......... •••:•••::::os ,•••••••••••••.•• .. •• ••.- ,.....,•.-eik••••.::.:-:-•:•:',:::-;::-::•••;•.,. •1:-••-::-•.:: •••::.• :'1:-.. .•.-•::,•••••:'•••, •-...•''-•!• de.:•iy'-:::c•":! :.•-•.-.......::": '•-k.::•.: .,;-::•.:.:;••"::7.•'2".:1••<",... ..- ••••'...t;:•••'...'"I;:":I'll;''...'.....!•!":-.....1:r'::::•..:••'..,.:7...n. '...,•••:•.• "•••.. :::•• ::',:.,•:::.;:.nt.,,:.....4.,...f:‘,"i•fr.'.".::k••'••••••'•P•"':."1`...' '.. •• :•:.•'.•-• ::.. :::Iii::'..' : ...•... . .!•`*::.4.!:41::..:.'...:7:::::::f:..1....•:- •.. -.:::.-. • 4. _.. - . - - • • '':::.:::: •:::I . ... .:::.-- - r,„,w....:::..:. .. -...... .-:. ....-92...... )4;)i...- ..••• .• •• - " -,.... !•:-„,...-:.:, • ......,...-).,,,' • ----- ._. . .. •• ..... . . . . .„,, ,......,, , . . . ,, .......::::ei ,.,•-•.;::::: A ...4,. .. ,,,„.." • .;-• .. •-:::....:• - "... ••:- •....• ... '..,:.•.•:r::::::::::::ii \ill tlini.C.4.; . . •- ". :.::.:..,1:;-:::..c..::.F:...z.g.d. - •••• -- -••• •-• •••:. - . "" .,: ..,::::::.-.:::::::::4;::.•,...::.,„, . . ,. • ' .., •••.:-... '-::‘,...,!..::.::: i :•Al,.... : AL:-•••• i A"i' i i . '.. 6"Lift'.. .., ... •,,,,,!„•„*"..)•• -EV "•••-•••"'z...,„,...... • . • :A. •. -1.1 44T :,..„*• !f10:',3.'.;„. : ........ :1,: ..0 4.: .1.::•••....1;?-•••■IEliii:: ..:!':"'.... ::!:!**.::.:e:Ailf!Y: •*!4'•• 4**•••r'''..' . ... . ,... •... . 4,..„. ••4, . , - 4................- - :::. ..• 4 . I 1 o: ,,I N. ,— 0 S�8• " 228.7$' �_ "y , 1/ _ •\ �.4o IR ' ` `4%T / • �J -5 ` .♦� l '(�R ! iPRI/ �/ •. . ,.y. o 0 _./ 'F' `��; F -;;, ' tie METZGER RES tork REVISIONS i I 1 I d% ao• -": - ‘ — A 01-10-m FIR IV 1, 1 CO -,- .., ; FlR ` —SOWER POLE i I1 40 A _O FIR MI lo 0 ( 1111111 moos o I " . ORDEINAy s. C VIII II EXISTING IS & • 40' STRUCTURE DEClDUOU • ao I n N. La PI 9 ': VT 1 AREA o Z S M BME RACK FOR SPACES Q 5Ef E A 0.91EET IB660 rood li & 0 `■i tua2 3.O'X,30'SIGN EASEMENT ; ® ( ,)EES-E60S •- 7■■ .��! �1 D-- QQ :;; ■`■■■■■ �wPa■■■.■ !L° _ R eL cr�zw�a�E �III�■IIIIIIIIII■111■ Harr:urr 91A11ED CATER YALAT EASIDENT FOR MALL DICE PARR 70'. • �"1'1"e: �. CAW 1D APID,EIPIEJA9OtAM Ri o I el 4 lir.■ 02 �i6I N••'00'00"E 287.79• 10 Q ■m .e,© ' •==), Widowilmiirdi-- ,.1■■■.M _ - — ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■w § Pala IL PROPOSED I 1WI� ' / 0' EASE. /95001167 0I m UPPER LE FF 230.0 0 (III11 I I I1 • _ _ _ _ •- _ _ _ O aJe,EOY�N No Fy-1 — LOWER LE FF 217.0 J E LA ■1 ` lal 1111•111 •• 1L _Fr r Rim E OA9N N89.11'11"E e 2 982 85• , 1 Q BIM I R61 EL 721.80 ill fV ` 1611111111VNEa 1■■■■®■ 0' EXISTING ENTRANCE Z �j\■■■■■■ I DRIVEWAY INTO KINDER-CARE • o ;; ■IIIIIIIIIII i • //� o I EASEMENT m ilk s i A co O:i:••ri••••R—.e�■••••••••••: p t- -- :•I�� ap- SUMMARY QIRWAR E]oUONT ■ O 97E OA TA I - . WARM UO1T I W O OESO RRON: TAX LOTS 1404 1500 AAX,.1300 mI ADDRESS 11313&iv NALL BOULEVARD 71OARp OR£GON ,it 1 0 i SITE SIZE: 2.25 ACRES VAP t51 ,777 pA �' E703TINC PAM=0 vA SPArES LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE I < TEMPLE 9PTE•2(7 FINDEAPPED) L'CLLP n 1- ARG FF 219± 1 O W I�oiAARww .as1�ACt 1 Z I GTO1 BASPI UYOIG AREAS meows ROOMS A10 RESIDENTS ROOMS): (r^ � J611 EL 72603 cosmic TLOE 3,6 S T - I'! `-�'� Q PROPOSED A9NAY.364o S < FLOOR 1.266 Si) lit \——171 TOTAL AREA DEOCATW TOR UVLMG TAOUTES-3436 S C PROPOSED ASHRAM NET•mveMaus AREA: j N Z N89 1 E PAYNCAREA-s.9ID S _IN c FF 219t (MATCH EXIST) 3 6Ta61 MANIOE ROOF AREAS aOr4",.00 S o m Q PROPOSED 1 RY EL 710.60 , :: � �� 2 w m nJ C._ IYATER ODAUTY: t,. • I TO TOTAL-I4.3T0 Y Q 1--�o o-- 0 0 0 - 0 _o J o LAPDSC PE°AREA'37.'u sr VICINITY MAP _,0 S88'53'12"E 734.7A' ovo, y d F— KEYNOTES: W p3 er 1\ SITE PLAN Q E1oSTIMO ENTRANCE NAS OXEN RECENTLY DOMED TO 40 BY ADJACENT O6MER = Cl)F Y-20' a MALL PAIN OFFICE BSRDU4 ,,I'I O INSTALL 70"ATT.I101 PRESSIIE SOOIUA Al Cd6 UIIOIARE LIG1S. IppIT TO BE 10'. EACH POE TO NAVE NU@R V UCA11S 910,Rl 16111 P/1100L 0410 10-10-O0 0 IIOIWS 6 MERMEN SHALL BE LIMITED TO PROW'=RSV SERY16S F004 ROM BEID SUCRE 900 P11L MONDAYS T16U MOANS DTA TIE EIICEPTIOI P1RKO NO 96122 Di LEGAL/MOM NNW NO C 0 CO A,,A--0 , -� r. `�`��� acs, IGD I�� 228.78' „z_.. VV�`� 'f H �, . . .., • _ - �U ,..192` • O j: 7 I L 0 _, IF",►% ►�; F�\�, 4L METZGER RES ""'' • ' I h L \ ill \40- ` a)- , • A m-lo-ci• / FIR s�1 1�/ ` ryry / FlR C :'DINER POLE .. \ , ,I ILL b �o 2 26•--yS / $ 'r IN ai I 're, o i / i L 1T_O' LV 0 1-;" • • • • ''� w ryMy 1,1111111P o • • 2 I r dllllllll Iii • EXIS11NO 40' 1 I MI STRUCTURE �y LEWIS & ,Q I DECIDUDU . I = 8 11114 22 ,� �•' • 4 225 w -- -- -- -- ��B•• 111 I ���•. VAN VLEET I I LAID n, 1A ._-- • CONSULTING ..1."' '•-----•-,..-.�-- - ..� �' , Z `229 ENGINEERS •Jaia��iIl• w 10660 d boom fur FFOO ti�4 I � _ u. G-i ,_r• = 10 R 110 9OI€ASEIENT�••' . ® (50)gees 'os9Plfo. (sw)e05-1208 I. 225 ■■■, '??4.__- r moo-- SANITARY NIAFIQE ' ''I gg '.r��Q�■■■■■■BI■�aNII■P�'ni1■■■■1I■■■■� - L -,. RIM EL E24ES I ` T II E . r. ■■■■.u. _ ■ EATER VAULT EASDEMT�I•r'S_00 ri: , ./ •Mi■L.JJi:2■ •� FDR MALLTcI ASQ .' I•'L• I T, iA�■■■■■■1_ai■ • '�• ►p 3_ JEl ooze.x",o.00 RI •10--r 1;211 ■titi ti �,� '•, N'/'00 00 E- '-•,2$7.79' : I ® �_. ti\••• i I '--.-,• _" ___:�-.i////.%////i;�;.siiwlr :41.....■.■■■■.:...■. ■mrmmmEmEmilmEm i�u■mu■■ila■■w■ mummow. ' : ti S �... . PROPOSED TEMPLE''•.___ I '- 1p���w���1 _ EASE. /95001167 q �+ ..........-UPPER•-.E.VEL FF 230.0 IIIIII' I `:ot.•i` '•i _ w 1`' 220- `- i LOWER LEVEL FF 217.0 "�e✓`_•' a? I - - - - -••= e o Ci:�i' �> ` 228.78' --2-- ♦�.0 I of ■ -FIR+ '9 I ` •`` • • - i • ' ' • k �7 -� X32} _ y� 14.311;, 7 ..//PR I, '/ N . -' r F.112-‘, �� !� METZGER RES E, ,2p,/07 . co 0 \ TsoIo' I I ` 1 4 . ` \ , Jl -0, i 4 I. FlR I II :ROWER POLE _ O ' I1 � 40A I I; II a j ■0 a IIIIIII _E 219.6! I. OROI,EWAT U f EXISTING 40• 1 STRUCTURE LEWIS & DECIDUOU •6D 1 1 iti •.. w I d s I , 1:C;$ N 1 I IS VAN VLEET Z ■ '� CONBLILTIN ENGINEER:p r. II booms a II FOU10ATE M ORAM ®' `■i roe 7.0'a TAO 901 EASEIIENi'1 I g _ 113660 m�`e153we os6p10nss UM— es B 0- d SANITARY NAN,QE (30])865-1206 Ma :'.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■uu■■■■ "..I` . ---- RIN EL 22925 Qo 7 �IIIIIIIIII■IIIIIIIIII■•••• • MU_ sIRwa TO `• P 7��•� • I:. 1MALL COIN PARK 61a110E: WATER VAUlLT EAMON 17.00 I — ■■6A7-1-�:_\■■• r FRE WATER • �� � YTO SFRMQ/INIUTI S — - /�--■ -a-aog f`■■5t#�t±�l'\■■ II�1 r�n°0�c T,MONWAWATT 9 050 x IoAO 6roia1WE5 91MEDr WM WATER /A Ar I �i/tiJ •T,aR aeA6/N I( rr -L! .:GI■■■`ice%S\17 r ■ 0 I->�0 N 6'00'00"E 287.79' gI�rI © ri Q S `�,`+� I■R■ II* - ■MI♦■■■■■■NIPMI•■�E11M�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I,III! ' 8 I PROPOSED TEMPLE 11 E. ,r,, • Rse"R W • a a : — EASE. /9'.11167 N N /�y� a UPPER LEVEL FF 230.0 0 �I VIII I • ER3T616 s '. )A a ___� .�_ —-— :�. °��r g'Q—e Lro wlu 6us�ESS?A,6cL — —��. 6•ouv,lr SERER w V I-I-I • LOWER LEVEL FF 217.0 fe MR7a L A�� r ��I W s' — — — A1a1 AREA ._w AI id . •.0 -.an- _ ruin. _ _ 6 1— 3•CO O I '• 't\,■II I ,l' A, , •RN 0.721.66 1189'11'11"E 289.85 < 1°� p mu V9■■■=1 j '' • EXISTING ENTRANCE I�'I 0 \ - ® CA' ■,.■G■■• �AwvlomlATE I INTO KINDER-CARE F'+•1 Z �• = s• • DRAIN ——R V•IS■■■■ •a LA 4' & a aT WAor rCR DRIVEWAY c „• ■IIIIIIIIi iL1i6>����^�•; • : /w/: >R wy ro c Ii EASEMENT iO qa • ■ IC 217.5 <..• `''■ -:s I 9 1 •6►�31 �. •1.'I p 11I I fold i CONSTRUCTION NOTES: z - `Fa o Q fuaN•'sis 00.11 AT GOO TO 1.573 I STRUCTURE \\� _ to I. OLEAMtOLM74�E 1/15TALLEO AT ML pp//sglT LOCATION AVID MERE MEET ELEVATION Or 6.515 SAN -i:: •O W 1__.1 . s FF 219± . I .., Z 2. SCHEDULE HOBO ING.CR ISM LE THAN 11' COVER. 1U.DINER SEE LINEESS TO Qi 4'sTS I __4 :i CATCH BASH BE PVC>OS•WATEOAL d•s3 '4•. - t.__ 1••' a•T All EL 27085 ®Cli l KEYNOTES: -\-. —_—'• Q E10S1910 SERVICES ay*L*IE TO TOO LE 91[: r ME WATER ME I PROPOSED ASHRAM I 0' r, 4 FF 219± (MATCH EXIST) T V► _ --- Y� T LoE wN _ •t, 3 s1C M UMn10LE 6•PRMAR!POWER COMOUIT 0'� O1 6'•. - RN O..(MM7,tP2.� Y REMNIONE OOMOIIIT O G WATER WA117►MALE 0 ,•_ E M(E 127 21n67 O I V 001ES5C WATER EIER VIM OCYA 0CIIMCC TO 5O1VC MOLL W ,`- • !aRT(S 1» O] MO••0117101 RE119 TO E MULLED 16001 1145 COIrR/ICT. Q U•II 0 0 p, 0 �� p .�1♦ R06 E M(R Q O /'1 X W 0_- 6 PRONE 2'IMINATION STUD OFT Or DOMMESnC WATER ME DONAU 6AaOLOR LL Q• $88'53'12"E 234.78' -- ".— DEVICE a nE TEYPIE 91L 0 3 O w SSIITFF UTILITIES LEGEND Q Qs SEE NA CT Sr TAL ON SMTARY MEET C-1. C 1.1N CONTRACTOR • • : 0f901 H[AL 0°Z — n 1 SEE MMAA6MOLE ETAA ON 9EET C-s. CONTRAC7pR ro -.. •l• ,• —•—6 s w— NEW SANITARY � SITE UTILITY PLAN MWELE CONTRACTOR. ccaRO.urz MOGT1W OLMTS 0C OL6lOLNO w In 0 //� -—(SON— MOM sANrARr EMIT I1��', I ''•� O I— =F (// (515— NEW•TORN SERER 13 L� GTOI BASIN , 6 INSTALL BA00L0R VALVE ON FOL6a710M MAIN PRlOt TO CONNECTING TO ———(512— MOM STOM SOO 0 • RM60lE 20 0 20 40 0 EOM 1-Roos ORAL FOR TOME. E Q - , •- NEW WATER CQ7 Cij, UTILITY POLE DM 10-TO-CO -R— COMM WATER ,O. I• FM RVORANT 0 moo s•ROOF ORAM ma*sow( E 217.0 OR- COMM MICR M::1 ,::1 IC� 6O C011Etr 0040141Wrs ro ROOF DRAM, SEE ARCHITECTURAL MAIMf3 Fat 1„OlCT NR 96172 -. IV- THE WATER LL�J IL�J c— VIER CAE V v UNITY VMAT pOMSPOLTT LOCATION. 00 NOT CONNECT 15 TO FOUNDATION atA6L C- L[NEW� � ( (if TRANSORER 4,10 PAO 0 BEOM iOL6011T101 ORA6L SEE OETAL !�M.\ 91801 u0 • - LOR POLE ® PLACE 1.0 vs M.CLASS 100 MP-RAP AT 011�1EiAJll. C— E7141M0 ELECTRICAL -To; n_ WALL MINTED UOIi•E MVO1T ELEVATO1 GO. C EAN OUT •( . FRE OEPARTRENT COMECON SECIIOM OF•11}81 SEER POE 1610Ob4AM 11716E ammo TO E w WIN HOLE N N VIA.C .--.•• .E 0 PVC 0.•.Y. • o9615170172 ON MOH SIDE OF A9RAY DIRECTLY Mro SWAtI CB G101 BASIN 0 0 CLEMENT 0 WATER OUMJTV FAWN AS RE••-.a. " i T .•• .T7 of HELD. Q o L0 • ••••T 601 • • • * li :es 0 0 0 0 ,tIrP , 0° • .. '4 226. ''' 1 • • • [ d 0 0 1 0 cto ...... ..... ... ..... 1...,„ . [ 226... '''''''''''''''''''''''''---------------- ----.... i ..4,.....k 4, ....q.,., • - • --- . • ' ' " -. 0 27 ; ..•-.... . ... 1 '''' I ...."--. 1 .. I pw= STRUCTURE 224 .''''''''''''''' •--".........al.. i .--141' .. v• . ............ ..... s.. . . ... ... ........... 22,.. ........ . . .. .49. ---....... .....-----.) . • : . . . ... ... , I................................ ........ ..• . ............. . . . "'•-•.. • . . .............. . . . ......... -.. "*"... • . . . .... ......... • " . . .) • .--..-F-::::-224-- .... . . . . . . % '-. . -... ,. -..... ---.... ......... ... . • ' . . ................. •--.... ---, .-----. --------- t .......... . . .. : : : ■'. ----- - *-- ............. • •...... . • . . • --- -•-• ... ..'%--1".•P....iP-22.3 t....• .....„.. .. .. 11:1;1 , . . . •............ ............................. .. . % . . . .... ............ ... ....,... . . ... ................. 11‘..o ...,.. . ':......., •• •-.....---,.. ....... --............... ............. ..... .................,. 220-- --............ .',.... 219-- .....................%. LI .. .• .... .. •-„,.. •... .... •..............................:::::::.............i..-1L..-12. •.....:11:11 : •11..... .6" --::... - --;-------------:::::.......................... ..... ....... ..... •%*: •.. ... . '.. . 1 ................. • • • • • , ... ... .. .„ • .. • • . • • . • .... \ , J . .... 2,..- --........ --------..... 0 .................. . . . . . ... , , .. .. , ,..cp -........ ..-si . . . . . . . • .. .. -. -. .. . . .... '1 .............. ................ .... .. -.. -.-.- --......... ..-.-*-.-.-.•....„.... .„„-2.-,-.-.....,.. .• •.......... ....... ...• .....E. .,'................... .i... .-... .. ..-........ ........................ .%.......,.%... -.......... .0 p...-.-............... ........ ... ... .......... ..... .. .... .. .. ....... ... ..,.. .... .. .. .. ........ ......• ................... ...... ... ... .. .. ..... ..-. ......,.., ::...,. ..-... . • .... -••,,,•...,.•..•. ..• .--.... ... ..,......... ........... . ........-...•.... - ..„I 0 0 ,. .--„, i,. .. ..i;. .n.. 5 -....... ...., ....... .......... --. 2,5........... ..: ...„ ........ ...... ....... -.,., . ... ... ... .. ..9... .... ...-- 218 r "PLAZA GARDEN APARTMENTS" 11555 SW 88TH AVE TIGARD, OREGON ■ PDR2P0 1 - 00003 /'IAPs , I •--r-s'N-- i .,-;;..'-'-,.•;:-.. Nri.: ,..01, ~ o /r`i 9 3 M1 9 �� S 22 . 78 _ N S I / Ni, ....„ • 446,_ . CD 8 — 2 2.4-f- -• . v —NY I- N\N . �' FIR �. �� (4 7/ ii---:;./1,,,,\tR 1 ,, ^/ ,,s 2 �./ ,--)0 It- -- ? M ,E TZGEE C i IS _____/ \ \ / ->...,' I REVISIONS ' /" ' ' I 1 01-10--01 FIR ___\ / ; / G \ 06-05-01 18„ -------- \ k , ,4) E., ,�\\ / I FIR ` ,,i ' YL�_. s P 0L.L.... / 1 \ 40 _ I 0 :t-t� , ,',,, / FIR ! � ..„.-.::,:„..„:,1„.„.::.:,,,/ A.9 ':; { FORMER PROPERTY LINE :� . liii 1 —n ..„„, ,..„....; EFL- i i-- _ ______ _I , (-- ----- I i C EXISTING LEWIS 40 STRUCTURE INSTALL __ w. - Ad yS •• o ABC �OT 1400 CONSTRUCTION ECIDUOUS ° i wl 3 x :,,,,i.S„.,/, A1 ".1;f' , .,, ,,,,. ; o [ VAN VLEET LANDSCAPE I ° f AREA O Lux CONSULTING s ENGINEERS . A i N . I I Z\ I BIKE RACK FOR 2 18660 sw boones ferry road s 9 BIKE SPACES A SEE DETAIL SHEET f ��calcfir�, oregon 9� 62 i r`► 5.0' X 15.0' SIGN EASEMENT I (503) 885-8605 phone■ �-- EXISTING EXISTING PARKING PARKING 15.00' (503) S$5---1 X06 fax LOT PARKING b — SANITARY MANHOLE o 2 ; IMIIIOIMOIIMIMIIII 6 L�._ ___I ._ RIM El. 229.25 / . . N11 Mrs 20.0• x 15.0' SARED 15.00' II IIIIIIIIIIIIII WATER VAULT EASEMENT �1 ; FOR HALL OFFICE S� all 11111111 1111 . Si 50WAXK10.00'MEiJT AND TEMPLE/ASHRAM o I iii o cis I :.:::\,:: ,.:'./ —__ 1 20'+ 71111111111111111 1110 i (NI gil X r21 100'00”E IIIN II III. N 287. 79 I v I iii i ® 4 -4/ , i€2____ >'' - .I �. .' 11 EXISTING --- , DRIVEWAY UPPER L_EVE_ -- - 230.0 _ _. _._.._. -— kx�t 11 .` ore ► t _._. _,_ p _. O __ r - - / \ 11 4T �; cep CA \J I LOWER _EVE- 217.0 I N �d l Z I1 %r I SAN M 226 C1J v '' _� ,, , © r 1 FLOW •0 1 1 . /� R A (E 222.6 111'1=4 __,�� wi. - CATCH BASIN ❑ - - 1 _ ._ _ , ----- 2 8 98 I`..11 i Ii ® RIM EL 22'1.98 L1 Iil• MID EXISTING ENTRANCE CD M1 /0., ' in :Iiiii� ° INTO KINDER-CARE j!Ej'^f�p4�ro;ti; i �s''+• 1... f t`1 'e �t 0 1 /I\ , IlrAff Lo , .. .,.., . ,,1 ›9,.. ' A 00 • ,— 2 ; 2 . - - - i /0 cy.,..._ 0 ,,,, SUMMARY r-i -` SITE DATA � > 1 REMOVE EXISTING -,-,_ I l \ Q > Q .< s MOUNTED LIGHT :.'') III I ;,, DESCRIPTION: TAX LOTS 1400 ND 3503 �; . PROJECT ° a F 1i j ADDRESS: 11515 S.W. HALL :•• 9- "a TIGARD, OREGON ,`� LOCATION I MAP 1 S i 35 DA `C • SITE SIZE: 2.25 ACRES © ¢ �;� ”' "' s fi' z o > > ti , 1 EXISTING QE i,; I A PARKING SPACES: 1- Q SW PFAFFLE ST CY s I a `.p" TEMPLE SITE - 2 (2 HANDICAPPED) !. "' ° I LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE �-- . :: SHARED PARKING = 96 (4 HANDICAPPED, 23 COMPACT) ,, AREA o, I EE 219-- ' i � Se ,�� : ���� } TOTAL PARKING = 98 {6 HANDICAPPED, 23 COMPACT) G N Ar, `�� �, / � TIGARD • , . - . :, / LIVING AREAS (GUEST ROOMS AND RESIDENTS ROOMS): F.- PLAZA �, (f) CArt BASIN EXISTING = G L _ _ __ _ 20'-i- I RI 220.$5 STRUCTURE 516 SF (FIRST FLOOR = L,5 �,j 1,396 SF) o i ___.. TOTAL AREA DEDICATED FOR LIVING FACILITIES = 3,456 SF �C,O\' G <` ? �� "1 �.1' rya �� _, �� PROPOSED AS -- RAM Q �, ,- NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: s . m �� N .�- __ p - - - PAVING AREA = 6,985 SF scow ___J Li N 2191 (MATCH EXIST) - _ ROOF AREAS - ,, . ,,( f� EXISTING HOUSE = 1,410 SF \C, s D 0) > STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED ASHRAM = 1,500 SF Q`U�� \ ' ��4 `n I I I m r ` C J RIM EL 219.50 PROPOSED TEMPLE = 4,635 SF Q S� �Ci z tr �f -- TOTAL = 14,530 SF I �._I C� El_ �q4 WATER QUALITY WALE '' , `^ <1 Li • C.D I (� - 0 0 LANDSCAPED AREA - 52,145 SF VICINITY MAP Cr Ch 0 0 Se> '7* ..> n 0 I l i 5 2 H"— .34 7t l' (.r) KEYNOTES: I I I Q 41 ..\ SITE PLAN O EXISTIN G ENTRANCE HA S BEEN R ECE NT Y WIDENED TO 40' BY ADJACENT OWNE R OF HALL PARK OFFICE BUILDING. I•- (ID 1"=2O' • hi 0 INSTALL 70 WATT, HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM ACORN LUMINAIRE LIGHTS. POLE HEIGHT TO BE 10'. EACH POLE TO HAVE NUMBER OF LIGHTS SHOWN WITH TIM BOL. . DATE: 10-18-00 0 HOURS OF OPERATION SHALL BE LIMITED TO PROHIBIT WORSHIP SERVICES FROM BEING HELD BEFORE 6:00 PM, MONDAYS THRU FRIDAYS WITH THE EXCEPTION PROJECT NO: 98122 OF LEGAL HOLIDAYS. SHEET NO RECEIVED NAMING JUL 1 0 CITY OF TIGARD- OF . nalliji IOW o ' e,\ ,r,.•. 1 t' p PROF vi,"-Wp• '''114414%Ydr. 226 - °'"t�W j Q°5 228. 78' ..... `° �� G'NEE Ca <1 /. L - - ,. , I 1 e= I, \\ 14,392 c �' ,� CIVIL / FIR F- Vl I " ' ‘° 2'W x 4'L 90REGON��� .� 7`- / 8\''''\ ......., / 2 -.■ 1, � 30, z '� )R . z___' t AR I / , SARAN :' / ■ - `�; �` `e N EXPIRES: 12 31 02 1 \ \• ; 1: _.._/ '. 12" • A 1 Niik �. trt Yl s FI �TlI �'... `, : REVISIONS :.; ' -_ F R <;c. ; ,INSTALL STALLING BASIN: / \� / j ~ ` � ` HAND PLACED GROUTED r. \ 01-10-01 I 1 , 1 \ 40„ / \ CLASS 50 RIP-RAP_ i N, FIR I // E� `` 1.0 cy CLASS 1 6 1 OUTLET Ali _ \ RIP-RAP 1 1 " ' \1,At'1' k \ \ IE 210.5 o _- e _'� 1 -- °° ';�r i�_ I r...n(.i c._ \, 211.4 IN FIR - r r-� J "-- I r.:, k_. \ r- , ELEV 210.85 s=o.0050 ~~ I iO all 0 ,, 6" STS IN CMIr c.J ..�t5,''s .,1 4 1.,,,.^ \ \ \410 V 5F, Ill La , \ (1%1' .'fat , s-.),-, All 0 , l� , 5r N °` 110' MI ` 5 9 \ "" �' 3 1111111 ‘ III '_ _ �° �-__, 1Is\\ W ATER QUALITY CR eSS-SECTION VIEW A- A f - - 1 r \_ ■ N.T.S.I 2 L 1 \ t \iiiii ,_ _ EXISTING I �� I STRUCTURE 0 ` ..f3 ■\ 40" I \ rr l I ` t�F✓ TAX -0-.r.- 1400 DECIDUOUS * I `, I 11111 2 ,; La -22 n --- -- -_ 225 `- - -~ xr7 --- - ~ �j - _ - . - - - - - `~.° 2 ,~ w VAN VLEET ` /l d I V ~.... ' i i LANDSCAPE ~~~-- �`� r ► ° �--- ', ~ _~~ ,� tr " 229 ®f�l�tJL TRlIa�` Q __ ENGINEERS , / --0.- ... i MU' , - r . ♦ ~ ~. , f \ ~ ~i \\ , ,' ; 18660 sw boones ferry road // I \ ; ► , tualatir�, oregon 97062 223 - \ \ ♦° _ - i`1 y 1 ' ® (503) 885-8605 phone '� � 226.0 --■_._. .. � ,` 5.0' X 15.0' SIB! EASEMENT r I , 224 ; 4:-O ~ ' (503 885-1276 fax 226 - -.. 00 r 2 2 4 � -_ `\-., -~ °\ I SANITARY MANHOLE , 226 225 22` 1 ~~~~♦ i I....' _ ._._ rr ; RIM EL 229.25 , , ., si�i1��ua1a»aiiu 111111u1.�: 11i� miuiaa � - 15 0 ARED // ,. N (.0 N 229.0 ~~ ♦ 228.0 •IIIIHhIIIiI'iIII!llIUuIa$1 1 223.7 `~- .„ \ 20.0 X . ' r 15.00' ' N N N N N ° 227.0 N ` ` ` �\ WATER VAUEA+SEp1K t ©, Id ' ti 0 c,i �. a, II 229.9 �, N 111111111111111111111. 111.! � ~ 223.5 1 - ., \� FOR HALL t ' r �,!II , PO N �•, 230.o ~ _ SIDEWALK EASEMENT ., AND TEMPLE/ASHRAM rrro I Q (-)9,,ri' , 0.50 X 10.00 e r 1 I orprisim . 223 � ,1 -a_ �,�; `--,,_ `, ' , N( 11111 �� po gib 221 ~ 1M . �,. �° I 9 s� \\ r ' ♦♦ �, _ N 00 00 E _ 287.79 , r f r y_ ~`♦°�. NM ".- ' 222.5 3 i �,/i/��Zit/ ���1 ' ~ ■■■■ II �■■■. _111111111111111111111111-1111- ■.■..■■■��■IB■���� ��■�■■ i__ ��� ,_...'f _i-- >:` 4 ' s ® "• 111P1'_ 1 !�i 7` f \ s r-r�r r_. .�.�r.v. \ ` `\ �,�'*�..,. ..�'} • ~i -.-..... �.r nit �1 .. - `\ \` ` \ f�' .ry-..� Nit 20 � R00SE(� TEMPI ♦" I �. rSt�. t,r; }:, , :::Al s.;" - -------rte - - `� 23 .0 ! 222---�� 6(�N SAf�J 1H ° - ._.._ _ .._ 1` ` °� -.. \` , # �. -- E V _� 0.0 --� 1II1II111 R 229 ,220-- " " � �I222 • NNH \L._0 _ ) ` , -. _ �� � ... \\ priillign f I ' ~~° FLOW •_ - -__ ` RIM 2 \6.0 °, ' LLJ \ � �` P"'\ w `~° - - -, ~`=- ------- .` 1E 222.6 , - ` ` 'st ----_,.., mum "�__ n ' CATCH BASIN 8 ® ♦ ®°°° `` 85 ! '\ 1 - 219 ___ \:C� `` 221 i RIM EL 221.98 ~♦♦ , , `� \ \ 0 21• i= -,, ° \ \1111111113 II ' EXISTING "ENTRAN'CE . _ 220.7 --�a ♦ ~ ? ° `, o` ° \ . C'� .... 230.0 ~ I ( r~ �' `\ - ` ~~_ -- .:MEI, -,, I~ _ 2 --_--- ° ., INTO KIND` R-CAI �E ,t i .'::: 218.5 - --Id `._ _� ' 20.7 220.74 °4 ',;' ;". `4.''-f'' '; ~~° \ ``, `, \ ' °° '� ' _ 11.11.10 r_ ° \ i 0 f,,Lll""M'IIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII \, / `_ ` �, ,f. - i, 225.0 _.,.. 0 RfM'219.8 r � - fp --../\-- - - ��, tit 220.16 y 220.4 DO ~ ~ �, ,�1, 219.0 L Z c______. - ~ --''� LI �r li .a.. _ RIVER ROCK `'- ��������� � ! �!' ���..' 0.44 ( ° s TOP OF BERM 2-3/4" RIVER RUN, 220 --._._._____� I \ ELEV 216.0 3 DEEP~ . 220.0 `12-1-1041 220 ' ` `� ti 3" BUILDING WALL AND FOOTINGS ~~ ~ `�79 /�� ` r 219.5 ‘ I \ 2 PER STRUCTURAL PLANS ,� r ___ `~~~ �` I 219.0 \. I I I ` ` Q I y' 1 1 < ................i ~ . -- "� \ TREATMENT \ 219 `�-~ �� JD \ DEPTH = 0.45' ."'�:_..,_="r":__ ■ °♦� !* EXISTING \�� .f..f�F \\ 1 TOPSOIL (..Y Cl___ j ♦ °®� r♦"""" ¢ '' I `�� \` JUTE MAT TREATMENT AREA LANDSCAPE _ STRUCTURE , \■AREA -F-77 1 -}- . , z `\� �., \, 2' MIN. 1' MIN. 0 ` I BOTTOM - _~I -°, CATCH BASIN ', ,`, WIDTH __T `\ -__ __ RIM EL 220.85 ■∎ < �� ° °. NOTES: I `° ~~-_~ �, ■�� \� 1. USE 2" - 3/4" OF RIVER RUN ROCK PLACED 3-INCHES DEEP ON JUTE MAT `° ~~~~ ..° - - \ " ' PLACED OVER 6-INCHES OF TOPSOIL OR BASE STABILIZATION METHOD � C-) `° �'~♦ '' ��� ` �� ° AS APPROVED BY THE AGENCY/CITY. > �J `° `-~_ PROPOSED AS_ RAC /' QQ a , 1 "E \, ,, W N A ~~~ - I►, . U i1 \ \ 2. EXTEND RIVER ROCK, JUTE, AND TOPSOIL TO TOP OF TREATMENT AREA. ~1,217.0 -- \ � B •• \ 3. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PLANTING RECOMMENDATIONS IN SWALE. �/ 0 A ~~_ _ -- 14...\ °MANHOLE ,` m I_.L_ ~ , STORM I I ~- • A RAM EL 2,19.50 ■ 0 1 ° 216 215 __ 216 • 215 Z `.,._./ ~~ _ 214 �� \ ` WATER QUALITY SWALE 214 �"'' �'�� g t `\ \`\ \� 2 WATER QUALITY CROSS-- SECTION VIEW B--B �c W I ~ ~~ 0 21�, � p \` , e` N.T.S. CC - 216 Pliftlill �► \ OU LET STIR.CTURE `\ .\ C 1 O 0 C _ ~ R 213.85 °. I\\ n I SITE GRADING LEGEND PLAN N LGND-GRD SITE GRADI G �--- ___ - - - - Cl)-154-M -"' EXISTING CONTOUR LINE EXIST. NEW 1"=20' KEYNOTES: ® I CATCH BASIN --"'"""".--155 NEW CONTOUR LINE DATE: 10-18-00 O MANHOLE �1 REMOVE EXISTING CURB. MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION. UTILITY POLE `� 0 INSTALL HANDRAIL. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. PROJECT NO: 98122 ,��` �Q� �� '.'9 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION AP\ FIRE HYDRANT X 0 PAVING SECTION: 3" CLASS 'C' ASPHALT o 154.5 NEW SPOT ELEVATION M C METER 8" AGGREGATE 1 "-!" SHEET PROVIDE STAKE. SEE SPEC'S V J UTILITY VAULT A 0 WATER QUALITY FACILITY AS REQUIRED BY U.S.A. AND CITY OF TIGARD. ELEV. ELEVATION .T © TRANSFORMER AND PAD B.M. BENCH MARK 0 0 VALVE BOX COVER TOO TOP OF CURB -`•:`-- LIGHT POLE C 1 BOC BOTTOM OF CURB /1\ /1\ MH MANHOLE ,�� -�,- WALL MOUNTED LIGHT OF CB CATCH BASIN c< < FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION i :,,,,.. }-•- -,1 4, a ,+111 t7 7 f, _ _ . pt 228. 78' t k . 2 r' ��'► / % 13 / "` ' ' S / `�y.,. CN F, ������ ;� '� �� NG l NFF �p FIR S,-�`/!. I a� ,° ct 1 4,3 9 2 r-- ,� 32 Sb. ,`j , CIVIL ) 1/' 'ifR iv-. 6,;,.,, „---. f, ,,,„ `(11FR I 1 'a‘/‘/ / N ;.... �-- ,.', �� N.-.'"' \ i SARAN T -1 \ ,r Z •' EXPIRES: 12/31/02 1 dR\ t r F1Q \ k / �� / N. REVISIONS v1 i t SONS I I � 4Q„ c.o. VA 01-10-01 ■ �" FIR I H / I \ N4. 1 R. .. L. ` 3503 / FIR \ : NN\ . ",� �I R . Lo .11. ry;. / (o I C „- , 4 I 1 \ al (,)18, EXIST CB �' ixI •i, .�E G -;-..,...=� :.. RIM 224.35 J f; - IE 219.85 t - -- - - p I t J 4. i► €iI : i 1 7¢{yfp$ �rvW_.n ; EXISTING X I S TI N C 1 i / [ _EW I -AX _C_ " 400 DECIDU i I 'CO 1 [ Lo ri . r---, N‘ V ii No 1 -tom,,/ j j i W • cr VAN fir'Lo ET I J < J CONSULTING < ENGINEERS ( r > ._a. .,.. 1 it , o ii-ri , 18660 sw boones ferry road i , LI Q ..m._ 5.0 X 15.0 SIGN EASEMENT I t� fa+�Ic� in, oregon 97062 FOUNDATION DRAIN BEE FDC i� 15,00' (503) 885-8605 phone III 4'W-, i1 -- - SANITARY MANHOLE (503) 885--1206 fax Iti y!R.aa.ua11�aau.aNauaa1� uui1N1R.a� �" RIM EL 229.25 } ® _ WATER SERVICE TO 20.0 X 15.0' SHARED ® i' HALL OFFICE PARK INCLUDE: 15.00' I WATER VAULT EASEMENT -- ..-- - 4" ROOF DRAIN 1111N13111.111111111111 . ' - --- - 6" FIRE WATER WATER SERVICE/UTILITIES C/- FOR HALL OFFICE PARK p4 M g• �'-�` .� TO TEMPLE AND HALL OFFICE PARK Q S=0.0906 1 s 2" DOMESTIC WATER SIDEWALK EASEMENT D TEMPLE/ASHRAM RAM �,I �aM �� �,� Ma...�.... 2" IRRIGATION WATER 0' X 10.00' INCLUDES 8" SHARED FIRE WATER 0 -I>4 ! • `� G FOUNDATION D A I N I RI-�---. L I ��� ��� `fi N li rim CV r:":21 Allik C 4 2 NEM 2 :Y'1..._ ► - ► 0 0 0 0 E v 12 W ►D4- F 1III !iiiii:::v _ � i I` f t f - t� i ( k _ ° { I" �� 4 ills _ ��', _ . DI, _ _ �l', --�L _�'_�,V, __ bl`" _ _ Dl','- y ��1 11 11',' it �l1 tr �' PROPOSED - MPL.E j ,\ 6,>FW r� SAN MH EASE. 95 011 7 �. �', ND '' °` i ,.� � �� RIM EL 221.9 + R S WER TO HALL BUSINESS PARK CC� ii 0 t _ C.O. 3 PRESSU E E ( - - - - - - IrIP PEI\ � t- - 2 <0 �-� ' �� 6" IE I 213.1 (S} A...... .C.O. _+ - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - 6 GRAVIT - Y SEWER C� • ; } ' X ' 1� EXISTING STU: SR I C 0 I 0. 3" PRESSURE SEWER (TO TEMPLE) �- 0.0200 - - .LOWER R *.E 1, 21 7.0 6 SAN/ C.O. o Q IE%213.65 3 <,o it 3" PRESSURE SEWER r EXISTING SAN MH E 11), 90 !__ FLOW r E:.O.P. RIM 226.0 ��� < ( � ! o ■_� ;E , �,�#, �P RIM ,21.0 0 - IE 222.6 ' v� AREA DRAT -. - o F.-2D- vi fE 219.0 ' - D E7 _ _ p ■ ,A I F I��o RIM 216.5 GATCH BARN 2 .8 5 U' 4 l 215.5 �, �� .0100 - 0 -,i-L .. RIM EL 221.98 8 11 'IV'sIt Ili Mill' 1111110 ': EXISTING ENTRANCE________) C , i `<°4 N 4 IE 215 \ l'' ," 9® C O 111110111101111111 N �``�APPROXIMATE INTO KINDER--CARE S\\ 4" ROOF DRAIN e -`�` ,r r A LOCATION OF / DRIVEWAY ;; ; , r,I - . ,.�t a EXISTING WATER. EASEMENT -,I�IIIIIIka °��'��'���.������ 0 ' CONTRACTOR TO °--. A. 6 IE 214.89 o FIELD VERIFY. CB �� O ` \,,,- `0. � o c� � RIM 29.5 G + W L ' o II \I/ ,''re rdl .:,-.,• Li IE 217.5 f o DO ,_.L:: T/11111111111.111/41111111111.• °►` C.O. !. - 4 STS4„ ROOF �Ri Q ��� --LE 1 C.O. 1. -� S=•.010�� �0 ® 4 S _ Q, t- o 5=0.0100 N I \ '�'� ® 1 i I C3� Q � M <► `" 1 I 's •/ I `f' . zy oo I ,S\ 4,/, * ° 0° CONSTRUCTION NOTES: Q o O co Z II vio o v' so _ EXISTING ,DE W 1. CLEANOUTS TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS AND WHERE 4" coa {k c� A �?TURN 4 STS DOWN AT BEND TO 4 STS IE 215.62 v) STRUCTURE N I . v� NOTED ON PLAN. MEET ELEVATION OF 6" STS 6" SAN IE 214.2 �.� I Q W 5 21 91 ' I 4"STS 2. USE SCHEDULE 40 PVC FOR STORM AND SANITARY SEWER LINES UNDER OR WITHIN 5 OF THE 5=0.0100 OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING OR WITH LESS THAN 15" OF COVER. ALL OTHER SEWER LINES TO a_ A /1\ 4" STS 1E 214.67 �.0. PROVIDE I,EW S CATCH BASIN BE PVC 3034 MATERIAL. 6" STS lE 214.58 o n L _ __ _ __ 10' DRAT IA GE RIM EL 220.85 12 (0,o EAS ENT KEYNOTES: >- �Io c� ® EXISTING SERVICES AVAILABLE TO TEMPLE SITE: 1.- PROPOSED rRA ®. " . _ _ m i 1 D 6" C.O./ C' v _ _ 62" DOMESTCEWATER LINE N 6 SAN 1=�- 21 -- (MA-CH _.._MIS ) c,/ - IE 214.60 ���� " 2" IRRIGATION LINE W E 4) I A4 /� STORM MANHOLE 4" PRIMARY POWER CONDUIT J 6" OUTFALL - w ,� 70' RIM EL 219.50 2" TELEPHONE CONDUIT 0 I 11 Ti :� • (O IE IN (N 12") 210.75 I I I m IE 214.4 % 000 WATER QUALITY SWALE 14 I�„- / �' IE IN (E 12") 210.85 02 1 \" DOMESTIC WATER METER WITH DCVA DEVICE TO SERVE TEMPLE. Z 1 --I i` CO IE OUT (S 12") 20*.= I _I 0 _.__J A Q . ( ,i 0 NO IRRIGATION METER TO BE INSTALLED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. Q 0 Q 0 0 0 0 NEW IE IN W 6 211.0 Q OW LET STR■ CTURE ( W Am= -- -- - - r-- ,A CD PROVIDE 2" IRRIGATION STUB OFF OF DOMESTIC WATER LINE. INSTALL BACKFLOW _ _ Q RIM 13.85 �i DEVICE ON THE TEMPLE SITE. 1 0 I I I S88°53'1 2"E 2, 4. 78' - :/ 6" IE 213.50 c 4 0 CONSTRUCT 60" DIA. SANITARY MANHOLE WITH PUMP. PUM' TO BE B DDER DESIGN ITEM. >' EIS " I SITE UTILITIES LEGEND S 1 SEE MANHOLE DETAIL ON SHEET C-4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIS L 'I . LGND-UTL Arito SITE U TILITY PLAN CONDUIT FROM BUILDING TO PUMP. COORDINATE LOCATION OUTSIDE BUILDING I I ( <C" °� ~ °°'"�#"SAN ° NEW SANITARY I WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. _ 0 - - EXIST. NEW I 1"=20' 6 INSTALL BACKFLOW VALVE ON FOUNDATION DRAIN PRIOR TO CONNECTING TO S � #"SAN EXISTING SANITARY III CATCH BASIN ,I -- - #"STS - NEW STORM SEWER STORM LINE. - #"STS - EXISTING STORM SEWER © ® MANHOLE 20 0 20 40 0 BEGIN 4" ROOF DRAIN FOR TEMPLE. 1E 227.0. 1 W- NEW WATER CD ) COD UTILITY POLE DATE: 10-18-00 • W- EXISTING WATER FIRE HYDRANT 8® BEGIN 4" ROOF DRAIN FOR ASHRAM. IE 217.0 DW - DOMESTIC WATER M © METER ® CONNECT DOWNSPOUTS TO ROOF DRAIN. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR PROJECT NO: 98122 FW - FIRE WATER DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. DO NOT CONNECT DOWNSPOUTS TO FOUNDATION DRAIN. G --- NEW GAS V © UTILITY VAULT G - EXISTING GAS T T TRANSFORMER AND PAD 10 BEGIN FOUNDATION DRAIN. SEE DETAIL i I SHEET NO E - NEW ELECTRICAL !`i'_ `'' 11 PLACE 1.0 MIN. CLASS 100 RIP-RAP AT OUTFALL. •-� --�-� LIGHT POLE ® E cy E - EXISTING ELECTRICAL /1\ /1\ IE INVERT ELEVATION o\ Im WALL MOUNTED LIGHT 12 SECTION OF STORM SEWER PIPE UNDERNEATH FUTURE BUILDING TO BE C.O. CLEAN OUT < < FIRE .DEPARTMENT CONNECTION - SCHEDULE 40 PVC D.W.V. C 2 MH MAN HOLE D 1 I>4 VALVE DISCHARGE DOWNSPOUTS ON SOUTH SIDE OF ASHRAM DIRECTLY INTO SWALE. CB CATCH BASIN 0 O CLEANOUT 14 WATER QUALITY FACILITY AS REQUIRED :Y U.S.A. AND CITY OF TIGARD. OF . I THRUST BLOCK _._. _ .. „.... . . _ . . \-7.) N 4 VW .‘*4\4747r0rAr Altillg \ \\\ PRO- :; 444% 5441 .... .... 226 -,,,,,,- 4sp,- \\NN. e _ , N. 228. 78' ...., -41 I =-.1 , - / - ..., 1 \ o , -... -4 \ oRC3E0IVG:Lo ". FIR FW--j-1-1\ 1 / tb , , 77- 7- \ ..,,,/ --/ 32'S■ , --<9 I ) iyjR 1, J-- , t- /- „,--. 1 tI1R i %\k/ , , , / )- . /'%". A , , SARO\ ' ‘ 1' -')/)\ 'F:1's 47L -V.---4 IFI\ Y\ 1 / \'t 0 '2 \' EXPIRES: 12/31/02 I ; '- `-- '`- 12" ----- , `\'' , i , , \:,, 1,2,, \ \ METZGER fiZES REVISIONS \ -,, \ ., ‘ . \ ' , , \ / \ \ / -, \ -, ,A. L',- /0/ \ 1/A1 01-10-01 , , , I 1 , -1- \ 40" - - '' NI , , , 1 , I / , (1/<f)' , 1 V . I / --\ _____- ------... i 1 \ 1 8„ ------- \ I 41111111■4 , EIIIIIIIIIII , . _____ , _ ...... . : 1/4 ...-1.1 -- or),AJ:-,) ,--) -, - ‘ \ NI _....--- t ()i i % \ \ \ FIR 1.0" \ \ a 7 `■,. (1/9/ LC) \ \ ‘ \ . r , . , , --,-. , IIIIIIIIIIIIII \ s, IIIIIIII1 \ _ ___ _ \ ‘ \ III _----- 1 - -- - r- ..--4, ■ 41 ‘ \ - , --__, Irlq\- ,, • , _- 2- -- 1 -_____ \ --- (-- -t- , , i , , --_ , LEWIS Ex. EXISTING , ,_,_, , , ; c ; , 40" I STRUCTURE , ...,,- ( , , „,, a - ... -,. , , , \--- A X _0- 1 z-00 DECIDUOUS i \ 00 , \ . \ .„„ ..,,.._, \ i \ . 228 \ \ 225 - !-- ii1 L____ ..,/ o \ \ o - _ o _ _ o 1 ., o - _ o , NN \ .,..... ..''''' .., t,`'.'''`i,.•: i __ 7r \\.\, •-/.. ,1 1 -rL--a-. N N\\. 227 1 r fll VAN VLEET , m -- „ . ,_ , -_ 9 , i ---- _ ____ LANDSCAPE AREA -- '\\\o i 1 . \ - Ce CONSULTING / o - I Z ,;''''. -, o < -'229 ENGINEERS ----__L_ , / - _i ,- „, , -__ 1 / _______ N ______ --, __.... , -- --, , ,.. _,, , - ,, , , I -., _ , , „.._ , , , i , , , , 1 SEDIMENTATION FENCE, TYPICAL. -, . ,. -, , , 18660 sw boones ferry rood - \ I / SE DETAIL SH --. --, - --- --- \ / tualatin, oregon 97062 . f - -___ _ I . ' (503) 885-8605 phone -_,,, /\,...) , ,, -_ -, 5.0' X 15.0' SIGN \EASEMENT i I , ® n/ ; 226 224 ------------226 ---------2-23------ ----•, 226 226.0 ........ _„..._ ,....„ ‘ \ , , (503) 885-1206 fox C\-/ 224 224--.6-‘ ---_. --_- -.--- ■ SANITARY MANHOLE 225 11-11-11-1 22, _ - _ , Q 1 i 1 „ ) -" N. Iriori ii_15".00:' i ! RIM EL 22925 / --, _ , - i , , I ■,.,,.,,,. .'"-•• 1 I I \AIIIIVIIIIIIIII 1110111111111111111PNIN1111111111111111111111111K /I\ h■ L , --.-..amor- --__ ---- ---, \ i °' C° 229.0 --.,_ 228.0 1 I ,, I ,223.7 5/ 111 11111111111111111011111111.1111111111 \ --, _. ---- \ N cNi C•1 (Ni " - \ AkHmApAERE--........_ ..T...H..111 0 / N N 04 4:229.9 N) -*-- 227.0 I.) immiligginimi ll ___ 223. ' .) i - \\ 111/ / .._„_,,, , , , Lo N 0) 1 L,?' '''- \ i 1500." _.i. 111 , , -- c.,1 N cq 00 "*-, '...4 lomml ' PI-1.26,iiii .1.1 , , \ WAT2AE0NR.D0'VTEAXUmL1pLE ASHRAM 10 I / 0, -- - ,- - o -,,.. - 0 230.0 ---_._ *'s-- \ SIDEWALK EASEMENT --- \ c.5\ \ 0.50' X 10.00' IN ,,,, cir c., A , - , IIPME111112EgiiI11111 I III ,r ---_ i , . . „_,, ‘ I MI ,----- 1101!Ade rr-I 1-1-1 40111111111111111111° IIIII 223 . illIP 4.1-'-'' :.'\ -7:7?--73 , \ FOR HALL 07E14: igi i - - -____ _ \. \ 1 II c\1 MN III (1/ ---.0- - 23 • .. \ (1/ --1221 1 l'At --_ _. . \ 1 , or . .. . .., (1/ N '00'00"-.1 , . , . ‘9,9/ , . , ! , mil , . - ilii&&• 7 222.5 ■ '' - _ - . i 01 ... 1 Arr --= ------2 -7.-:9' , i - r-J . -J I . A.- . L N- :-: .. Er 46.... 1111 , , t- , pm. iror . r e., ...._ ., , . , , 1-......... 0,- ,,,,; - -- \ 1 ---____ , \ \ \ , \ 7 rat \ 1 ' g,, : ' i ; , ,_ \\\\ \ \ CI 6\I 5 --1 2 210 ...j- -\UPOS_ D TEMPLE: --- , , ; , , , , . , , Ni‘ ND c:)::) 41 -- , „ „ • ....._______UP FIER--,EVE_ " 230.0 - . i - _..._ .. . . \ \ CAI - ,_\2-1M12-\_ivr 1 II rierA7,17 .1!i 60"-i•-r'SAN-14,1-I 1 \I. . . \ , ' . --1 p ,-....... __ __.... - CIO , , 220- - - - J.-4-•-- KII67.it .. . LOWER ,..E.VEts_ 71-- 2170 A-046N-46,N-■ ‹.) , i \ ------, ______ , , , , , __, , e , ‘ cp11 - SAN\MH \\ ,o' ; -1_ ,/ ‘' : 1111 OF lir 141,41 SEE CONSTRItrecTION ENTRANCE. i .- ,. 1 1 - e - . '‘ RIM 2U.0 \.„ 1 I , 4- ..). MX4 to E DETAIL SHEET C-,4. I -, FLOW ---___-...._ LI ,, (Exisit G GR,VEL) ', /'--. , , _____ ________...„ \ . , \ it 11101191711111=111 \ IE 222.6\ - Elil , ., --_ _ Mail rr- 41.4* 4. 141(-' 110' me mummum. , , , -_._ \\ , CO --____ _ --- 0 - _ii _____ _ __ 2 .......„...„.....................- , , 'd- --_.... C), II'LE BARR Ei• -T " CAL. -- - '''') - 7 - CATCH BASIN N89°1 ”E ,, \\ 289.a5-7-- .. . , \‘‘ C_ \ , , , 219 b- ...., ....._ ___- --___,,,, --, rim i.e. . . ,.. Alh i 1 , -- ow ime ir VW pi. 4 I SEE 3ETAL SHEET C-4. i , 1 , i I .. \ . , \ \ \ x \ \ , rUmil 11111F. ... . .... ... _AM ammemoiammirmommor iiiiiiiiiiiiii ....1 / 4..„ \ \ ‘ \ , P 21* 1.1 - 11-7 1-11 am moolgat • 111P1 Ili --, 220.7,-!\, ' _......1 „.. , 1 , ,,,, ., ,... . \\ , \\ \ EXISTING 'ENTRAN'CE , , ‘ , , c\i , 230.0 '''-.,_.,. -----' . \ \ 11111111111,11111 . ---. ' , L_.... 221 _ Ks , \ \\® INTO KINDR-CAFf I _,, \\ \ , , _- _..,, , . ,, , . .... 218.5 PAMMISMOINIIII-- _ _ T-220.7 I. 220.74 , ,\ ‘ Z '' ' t, IIIIIIIMIIII N \ \ N \ \ \ \ ., t ,' MIMI \ \ \ '\ I, 1 1 ' , . ■ _ ----- „... -----'...\ . - _I I . _ ,.. \ - IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMII.. --- r .....11111 1 L , < I \ , ‘ T MIR YPIC, 1 44111 'N ,_ 1 .7 _--------- A225.0 / SHEET7,6-4. t?.. III CB - 0 mu hi. I,M.'219.8 . --- i ....-- 4 .... --- : N`b II < liv A2:0 220.16 >ch.220.4 r ,c0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN - STANDARD NOTES ERO-NOTS 1 .,.. < DO ' 2)\8 -- ,-, -- __...- c\-'24/iiN 219.0 11/ z r- I 1 _ _ .,- - ________ _____ RECOMMENDED STANDARD NOTES FOR EROSION CONTROL PLANS --- -__,.,,_ 11111111111111111111111,1111M-RIEnr-,a11111111118 / ' o": ° 4 t 7 ----- - ,\ (FROM TECHNICAL GUIDANCE HANDBOOK, REVISED FEB. 1994) . I . - 011 - i \ 220.0 \I..._: li_ 220 2261. \ . -_ . A. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION/SEDIMENTATION K. STORM DRAIN INLETS, BASINS AND AREA DRAINS SHALL BE PROTECTED , Cl_ It .‘-'7' ____ 219.5 \ ----------- \ , , .":' i \\ , CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION (ANY TIME OF THE YEAR) PER THE UNTIL PAVEMENT SURFACES ARE COMPLETED AND/OR VEGETATION , ___------ ---. -- . \ . 9'NN t,/ -_____ „1,, --•f"1.... '' .. I 219.0 . \ . . L..1 . ,1 ) ‘ \ \\ "EROSION PREVENTION" AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS TECHNICAL GUIDANCE HANDBOOK DATED FEBRUARY 1994 AND UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY'S DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, R&O 96-44, CHAPTER 8. IS RE-ESTABLISHED. L PAVEMENT SURFACES AND VEGETA-110N ARE TO BE PLACED AS RAPIDLY AS POSSIBLE. ---0 21 7 , -.,- o o ---_ o . . :z 0 i -' 1 ,r2 r \ B. APPROVAL OF THIS EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (ESC) PLAN DOES M. SEEDING SHALL BE PERFORMED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 1 FOR EACH < 0 „ . --0--;)' "-' ---_..._ \ \ cc, , \ \ 219 -----,...,..,.,,. .„..„ . \ NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ROAD OR DRAINAGE PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. . , _....------_________ \ EXISTING ,..- ‘,--- , , DESIGN (E.G., SIZE AND LOCATION OF ROADS, PIPES, RESTRICTORS, (Y . \\lic\-- ----3 , , \ ‘ . _-- - , . \ CHANNELS, RETENTION FACILITIES, UTILITIES, ETC.) N. IF THERE IS EXPOSED SOILS OR SOILS NOT FULLY STABILIZED FROM 1:Y . STRUCTURE , , LANDSCAPE --- -- -_, . 1'4.---_-- '• ) \ \ NOVEMBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30, THE WET WEATHER EROSION CONTROL -- . I '---- ---,, , \ \ AREA . . --- , 0 L, ! r C. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE ESC PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTION, MEASURES WILL BE IN EFFECT. SEE SECTIONS 3.3.7 AND 3.3.8, TECHNICAL , _ . ----7F 2191 , , , , , -_ , , , , \ , MAINTENANCE, REPLACEMENT, AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC GUIDANCE HANDBOOK, FOR REQUIREMENTS. . --___. . \ \ FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR . . \ \ -- \ . , ,, 111\- CATCH BASIN ■ \ UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND APPROVED AND 0. ESC MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE DEVELOPER WHEN VEGETATION _L,-_______-_,., .. ------ __,..‘ \ \ ,-- ' . . . 1 RIM EL 220.85 \ \ VEGETATION/LANDSCAPING IS ESTABLISHED. IS FULLY ESTABLISHED. < , , . . t......, -- - _ \ . , \ . \ / . . \ \ , . . . ■ P. E.C. HOTLINE 844-8444, CALL PRIOR TO ANY WORK. , _ i / , , ,, __ ,,,,, ___-- ,\ , „ ,,, D. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DURING C2) 7 . -- . -171-(34 \ \ \ / -- \ \ THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, NO DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE < r,r) . \ STANDARD NOTES FOR SEDIMENT FENCES: / \ „ , , PROPOSED A i ,,_ , FLAGGED CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE PERMITTED. THE FLAGGING / \ -__,, \ (0 .. -, 1717 219± (MATCH EX1 ',-) , , , SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR FOR THE ' Li> cNC\I 1. 'THE FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PURCHASED IN A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT __1 N i , DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 7" C\/, , „.. --.217.0 sit N 8 911° 1 .7_, '\, ■ 1 TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID USE OF JOINTS. WHEN D 0) \ \ , 216 • ■ STORM 'MANHOLE ‘ \ JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE SPLICED TOGETHER I I I 2 z . ' ,, . \ E. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN _ . 216 - 4 RIM EL 219.50 ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST, WITH A MINIMUM 6-INCH OVERLAP, AND ‘. CONJUNCTION WITH ALL CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES, AND IN (1) SEDIMENTAT1ON FENCE, TYPICAL. . 215 --..._ 215 21 4. D: 1 11*.--- •$ 10 r r BOTH ENDS SECURELY FASTENED TO 'THE POST, OR OVERLAP 2" X 2" ' SEE DETAIL SHEET C-4. N.N4, '-` -( ''''(' --.2-14 -- -,4 -- , , SUCH A MANNER AS TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT AND SEDIMENT-LADEN POSTS AND ATTACH AS SHOWN ON DETAIL. I _..il \ < CD WATER QUALITY SWALE , WATER DO NOT ENTER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM, ROADWAYS, OR VIOLATE \ - 2)5 it, co ‘ , . ,.... \ APPLICABLE WATER STANDARDS. 2. THE FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO FOLLOW THE U.) 216 ----. . ...„,-..,-;-..,„,,„,... o `i 1-14 , OUTLET STRUCTURE . . CONTOURS WHERE FEASIBLE. THE FENCE POSTS SHALL BE SPACED A •gr IP,' lir ,or lir lor lor * lor V" 1Pr 1P" a lqr ■ lir - 0 , 0 . . \ 41: -4, 41I■ _ -- -- 114," N-- RN 13.85 .., ,. F. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE THE MINIMUM MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART AND DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND A o ___ , - --,... ________..._ 0 -.,,., „., ,, REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. DURING THE MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES. -- -- ' S 88°53'12"E ____ - ... --, 4 - - o _.....- - _,, ,---,A -.. -- / 2.- --4-7 A2-.. , v) --- , ---.. CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, THESE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED AS , I I LO CY NEEDED FOR UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS AND TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT 3. THE FILTER FABRIC SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM VERTICAL BURIAL OF 6 I il-.1 SITE GRADING LEGEND AND SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER DO NOT LEAVE THE SITE. INCHES. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL FROM FILTER FABRIC FENCE -- LOND-GRD 0 h. EROSION CONTROL PLAN G. THE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE INSTALLATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED ALONG THE ENTIRE DISTURBED AREA. ------154-_----- EXISTING CONTOUR LINE EXIST. NEW 11 1"=20' APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO INSURE 155 ---------- -----,,,... NEW CONTOUR LINE H © a CATCH BASIN • MANHOLE lk THEIR CONTINUED FUNCTIONING. H. THE ESC FACILITIES ON INACTIVE SITES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND 4. STANDARD OR HEAVY DUTY FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL HAVE MANUFACTURED STITCHED LOOPS FOR 2" X 2" POST INSTALLATION. STITCHED LOOPS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE UP HILL SIDE OF THE DATE: 10-18-00 - ixek MAINTAINED A MINIMUM OF ONCE A MONTH OR WITHIN THE 24 HOURS SLOPED AREA. , 45. CT) ) c-c, UTILITY POLE FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT. PROJECT NO: 98122 N'Q' EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION /0\ Alt\ FIRE HYDRANT • FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED x I. AT NO TIME SHALL MORE THAN ONE FOOT OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE, BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPSLOPE AREA HAS BEEN , SHEET NO 154.5 m 17 METER ACCUMULATE WITHIN A TRAPPED CATCH BASIN. ALL CATCH BASINS AND PERMANENTLY PROTECTED AND STABILIZED. / NEW SPOT ELEVATION PROVIDE STAKE. SEE SPEC'S V I/I UTILITY VAULT CONVEYANCE LINES SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO PAVING. THE CLEANING OPERATION SHALL NOT FLUSH SEDIMENT-LADEN 6. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY T pi TRANSFORMER AND PAD WATER INTO THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM. ELEV. ELEVATION APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT B.M. BENCH MARK ® 0 VALVE BOX COVER J. STABILIZED GRAVEL ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS C 3 TOO TOP OF CURB . - \I/ -El- LIGHT POLE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. / 1. /i\BOO BOTTOM OF CURB THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED TO INSURE -=--- -IN- MH MANHOLE / \ ./ WALL MOUNTED LIGHT THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE 1 i \ CB CATCH BASIN < < FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION PROJECT. OF ~ • E3 A A - 14,392 ` I:::::::::::::1 CIVIL OREGON .� _�» LANDSCAPE AREA NEW TOPSOIL LANDSCAPE AREA O^ DITCH rD, � ' ��' . , NEW TOPSOIL �—' STS -^� �---~~- '''<).- SAR�� �p 5 -O U.N.O. N0 --'~- / / Y� EXPIRES: 12/31/O2 SLOPE 2% (MAX) ' . . -Halle. REHM] .. . ' .. • . . REVISIONS ^ " /. * .. . . • ^ • . . /\ . . ' . . . . . . / 1\ 01-10-01 ��� � � *, ^, • ' E5 ' ` ~- '' ` '' ���' ~ PLAN Zl K ' m� °"� »wa*� ` �*�� . ,_, ,. , ,.e, AA/ ‘ / */*/\.w.W\ ' v~ ` ' ' ? EIEE;\� , \ , n ' ~-"' ' �4 OF COMPACTED - �� �r _ ' ~ . • � � • `. CRUSHED ROCK BASE � � < � NN ; .`• 0�~� o|TCH �.., NN ° ^ COMPACTED SUBGRADE 20 ~w ^ � . ' 6" ELEV 21385 � ' m .�_ . . � . � ^ � .' �^ M � 141114 ' n � /\ ' `�`-��' ~ Cl- GROUND ELEVATION � �----- � / \ � ' � ' LANDSCAPE AREA ' / ` � � � SEE GRADING PLAN � ' � . '' � � .. NEW TOPSOIL ` �' ` '� • ' ' :00 m � '' ' 5'-O" U.N.O. A` 0m��V�0N��. ' ` - D '.Q ' .^� .� � / ' ^ . . kith� � �� � ~ � ' � ~ e n�" SLOpE 2� TDDLEO ° � ' �� �� � ' �'�� '�'~ : ° ' |' '�'~ � � �'.� �' ' �r (MAX)` ' ~ ' ` ' u »' ^ � ' « � '. . �` � �' . • = WALL PER o�- 2' O^ ��N ZONE ' � �T�UCTURAL /EDGE �' o^ ' ^ _ ' ```- ` "~~r ' ' pLANS ' ' ' ' ' . \ \ 6^ - 6" 6, � -� o/� 6, OF DRAIN ROCK �� 4��� � , ' ^ . /' ^ . . / . « • . �� | nm"� 1�i� �� . ' ' ' ' . ' . ' ' ' ' '' ' ' u�,� ` m� �, �, '- ' ' ' ' ' N__(-0 ����[`T-}[)\ /1 z1 ������l-|��\J �� �� . , . ^�� ^ . .� `� . . `/ ` ' `__ '` �� `^ . . `� ��__�� � ' • • ~-'' ' ' ' /' - ` LEWIS � � . ' ^�' «W� ' ' ' ' � �� ~ '�' �� m� � - ��� • . REINFORCEMENT PER ' . �/� `�0�� PLANS ' m� ' / ��' , FILTER -.~, , " °��' • . ' °= uo FABRIC � ` ` �� ^ �� - \\4,,' OF COMPACTED •�� ' '• - ' fez .' /' CDNCRETE 3LAB PCR CRUSHED ROCK BASE ` +- NOTES� � ' . `/ STRUCTURAL PLANS' *V'^ • . ' � � / COMPACTED SUBGRADE G. DITCH INLET CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-478 ITC ��� � . '. ' • �~ • / " . � ' � ' ' [ 8 OF 3/4^ COMPACTED BASE MATERIAL -` ~ � ���. Aqx >�A�. / ASPHALTIC PAVING AND BASE ROCK • . � ' °�w�.��w.��wr ��� ��� � .� . SEE SITE PLAN FOR DEPTH PRECAST -- MINIMUM WALL THICKNESS TO BE 5" VAN VLEET 4" 0A PERFORATED DRAIN - a�"� • � -- DIA. ��, REINFORCEMENT TO BE REBAR MEETING ASTM A615 GRADE 60 OR WELDED LINE. EXIT INTO STORM' NOTES: 1. SLOPE ALL WALKS 2% (MAX) AWAY FROM BU|LD|NC(S) U.N.O. WIRE MEETING ASTM A497 CONSULTING e U�T|N a DRA|N SYSTEM - DO NOT WALKS APART FROM BUILDING(S) SLOPE TO ONE SIDE. ENGINEERS CONNECT TO ROOF DRAINS. 0 ��'° ^ 2. PROVIDE NEATLY TOOLED CONTROL JOINTS AT 5-0^ ON CENTER. '~""N|h, �FDOTING PER \ OT_-7_^, \ OT -0 SC A = STRUCTURAL PLANS 3. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS AT JO.-O, ON CENTER -- AND AT WALK INTERSECTIONS. 18660 sw bowies ferry road \503 885-8605 phone �� [�0�\ ���-1�O� ��»� FOUNDATION ~ . �� SIDEWALK DETAIL WATER QUALITY � � r [ OUTLET .c C4-1 1 /2^ = 1 -O^ C 4 C4-3 1" = 1'-O^ � C-SWOUT N.T.S. 2" TH|CK, 30000 P.S1 GRAY IRON, ~ ��� HEAVY DUTY CAST IRON GRATE. mNmN�N `' `� mNmNUrw" ��� mNm�»pm" ,ss.01' cp . .. 4- do, R|W ELEVATION 9 SEE PLAN . n ~ 0 ' /Qr `_--- • /so, /, | A INVERT mN��' m | t4-PSEE PLAN mNmv- ' �� ���w" " ~ mN�o°' �r o- / wr c� ' - �m �� / RADIUS = 25' MIN. A C-' -/ \ OIL TRAP WITH 4" 8" \ CLEAN PIT RUN OR 8 MIN. �+ � CLEANOUT PLUG ^ ° � \"x2" SQUARE EDGE 2"-MINUS GRAVEL DEPTH ~ \ / y \ . / FLAT BAR SUBGRADE REINFORCEMENT 24" PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF / / GEOTEX�LE A� REQUIRED' INGRESS/EGRESS AREA NOTES: • RIM ELEVATION A- CATCH BASIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF 10 GAUGE (MINIMUM) STEEL iiiiiiiiiiiiii li SEE PLAN WITH ALL JOINTS WELDED. CATCH BASIN CAN BE ROUND OR SOUARE B- CALK PIPE TO CALKING HUB. SQUARE. �o ANGLE BOTH ENDS OF FILTER FABRIC 7 GRAVEL\/��| ����hJ����[]| ���7-|��hJ ENTRANCE/\ �J��[- ^ / ��| �r\ v �_�_ ����/�^� | | \���� | |��|� �_| � | |���/����_ C- SET CATCH BASIN ON 8 THICK COMPACTED CRUSHED • FENCE TO ASSURE SOIL |8 TRAPPED ROCK DR SAND BASE. �` 4 ERO-ENTR 1 /2^ = 1'-U^ ' _ �� _r ' D- BACKFILL AROUND CATCH BASIN WITH COMPACTED CRUSHED ROCK. �o �o ---�^ E- DRILL (3) 1" DIA. HOLES IN TOP OF BASIN EACH SIDE. - |PE INVERT 5EE PLAN � a -� 0 rn' " 0L TRAP WITH 4" m CLEANOUT PLUG CATCH 7-��LJ [� /\ ��|KJ DETAIL ���� / ��| | ��r���/|� Ill INTERLOCKED 2^ x 2^ POSTS . 10 GA STEEL AND ATTACH CIV-CB 1/2 = 1'-O^ 12~ t � AREA DRA|N --��[} \/1 1-UV ~~-~° ' CAN BE ROUND ��/ » ' -- «« OR SQUARE. -�.� | � '/'�ANHOLE FRA�E AND COVER _,�~ |'F|LTER FABR|C WATER|AL ' °- ' |38^ VV|DE ROLLS )�' '` _ ' / / �| GROUT _~^�- | I | /o�11 1 ix.``^ ~- 'i�| 1,r FINISH GRADE ^ -~~�~ �--� .��|h��� -��=������ ��l\��r� EE pLAN) � PRECAST CONCRETE 1 1 /\ [��� /\ F�[� A DRAIN F�[-7'/\ || flV | � | ^ - - -~=~=-`' ``� (SEE PLAN) o"~6 EXTENSION RINGS. / / AREA�~r� ��| �r�|| � ���� | ��/�� | | �� '`� (J) R| C3 MAX|MUM OR �� � C4-1 1 1 = 1 -O -�- - �� /� ` 1 2^ EXTENSION MAXIMUM. �� 4 ' CURB� | \ | -T [� � T�� � � ��| \ ' / C� ���� / ��� / � �_- / ��r� / -- �� ' ' / __ �� ��r�.�/ � I �' '. ECCENTRIC MANHOLE TOP (.1-) NTS NTS lw ' ' ''' (Of�''' ' / . . �� ' I n ' ..' z� NOTES: `� � /��� ---~-~-- - -'--- '' ^ '' 1 PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS ^�~7 `// /k .�` /\//� /\ /\ /\ /\ x\ /\//\ x\` /\ /+ CV STANDARD M.H. STEPS ''' � -~~�. | , / / / / ' _ : - ' TO CONFORM TO ASTM C-47B m ' ' | C-478. | lo- -_ / / / � _ c��__� / . U .'..'. �� 2. ALL POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE �� ____ I I_| I I I I �u'. �. ' SHALL HAVE A 2B DAY STRENGTH O� - / / O' MAXIMUM SPACING i i /��9 -^--�-� -�� OF 3.00O PSI AND 2^ TO 4^ SLUMP, . ,°^~T / /� ' �/ ' A A ' � `' 3. ALL JOINTS TO BE RAM-NEK JOINT 7'O p� -~�� Y n / / ` / - q[ '' ' ~��| r� I � =R ON -k] -- VFW � �� '! / d ' MATERIAL O� BETTER' ] r� • / ���/ v ``�� { / ,FLO� '''. .,, 4. PIPE HOLE LOCATIONS AND SIZES AS �] r^ \ 2^ BY 2^ FIR OR PINE POSTS, / \---- ' ,'` PER PLANS. B^ MIN. BETWEEN HOLES. I | �} [n | ' | ' ( S%YY � '''' \/ | / OO ^STANDARD OR BETTER DR `^ � ., z C2)E�UAL ALTERNATE� STEEL . �. U ' . =~----- PRECAST RBNFORCEO � -� �]. " / _� FENCE POSTS '' - BO /^ TONGUE AND GROOVE �� _l � � PL A\ . . � ' MANHOLE SECTIONS ` �� -� - � � ' n~_ �- O� STITCHED LOOPS TO BE *~ / '. J '' TONGUE AND GROOVE JOINT {] | | I /w USE STITCHED LOOPS 'Y �` '' ~OyER 2X 2^ pO�TS , � -�" SIDE OF SLOPE ' m — �] 1 T '^ _----- 3/4^ O|A GALVANIZED IRON O�0� 01N�|r|�T�� p�Bmc ^� / -� ^��!/ '�LOvy '.. 6= '' STEpS .8^' DEEP x 1 2^ VV|DE �m��` ..' �� 4�� ' .m��� | � | u) O�ID MATERIAL- � '/ ``^�_ 6" 5,� 1/2, •.. WITH. 2l�:DROP. EMBEDDED . �� 0 �� ��_ . / �� CD Ur) - �u�Y eoTTom o� v `� 0nzn �oTTOw f � _/ ' . ' " °' 0'^. ' 'P'C*L �� ` ( ,- �� �/���� MATERIAL ' '/ ^ � . � ' ' POURED CONCRETE BASE ��•/w �^ �' o^ TRENCH »^ �o,�� � (5) SACK MIX KEYNOTES THIS DETAIL: / ' � ~^ ' ' 2500 psi AT 28 DAYS .~��\� ° � p. ��� �� �� . . ' , .` . , , . v '.� `\ .,.. . '`. �' • '. .� po 0 1 1/2" DIAMETER STANDARD PIPE. SHOP PRIME WITH ZINC DATE: 10-18-00 COMPACT ALL AREAS OF ' ` . : ` ' ' . ' '' �^ ' '' ''. ' � . /' � �'^ .' '.'.� ^' ' .' ../' /'.' \ `�/ OXIDE PRIMER. PAINT AFTER INSTALLATION LLA�ON VNTH OIL BASED � FILTER FABRIC TRENCH ' ^///\ ' � ' ' ^ � '' , `/ SECTION �_ � G COMPACTED ENAMEL. COLOR PER OWNER. ' -_ - - � � :Sc' ~*-~ GRAVEL BASE STANDARD 4^ CONCRETE S|DE�ALK PROJECT NO. 98122 ��| �� � U| �UU 1 �'�'' ' ��/' ' ' '. _�/ ' J/� - 0" AT 90% ' �/ u - « / - «« MIN. �| -�_ | \ } �T �� �� ��� �O COMPACTED 6" x 6" x 1 ^ STEEL BASE PLATE WELDED TO PIPE ENDS ^� . ~~ . ` �_ ' SHEET NO NTS SET PIPE ENDS IN 12" x 12" x 12" DEEP CONCRETE FOOTING. ( ) SEDIMENTATION ��N CE ET) INLET BA RR{E R (Blo—BAGS) CD 6 0" DIAMETER vA J O E 1 2 BIKE R A CK (9 SPACES) 4_ ERO-SEDF 1 /2" = 1 -O^ ERO-BB 3/4^ = 1'-O^ C4-9 1 /2" = 1'-O^ C 4 BKRACK-3 1 /2" = 1'-O" _ OF . N■IN. ,frcto „ limy 1 /1 N 9--11111111■1111. - . 1 °5\/)e 9 1Jb J 9 rw40 1 _ i - �fJs (�Jf 228. �8 ti J ;- 7 8\ �./ J 32 �` .-: ..►► 1 `)R ;j t, /, 'CAR I i \ M , I, N,/ . ♦ ND, OREGON . - / El--1 ' N►. 2055 � ___/ 1 x, _____ ∎ T - EOFO _ , / � �- /. FI� � / 1 REVISIONS i s. / I \ I __l. , „ /" / ' \ 01-10-01 / V� � 40 1 - FIR 1 o1 -4.02 / I h_ 18" '� \ 1 Ii o ♦ ♦ f FIR � .. WER POLE 1 I \ FI R _ 0 / \\' O \\\\*\\ ,. 111111111 0 EXISTING 9 DRIVEWAY ----- -- - ..-,, O / .. EXISTING W LEWIS Si 4Q// I STRUCTURE DECIDUOUS ci in .,,-,, y 0 NE 7) li I L . .. ., a_ n W 00 VAN VLEET I LANDSCAPE ° I AREA o Ew- CONSULTING ENGINEERS • BIKE RACK FOR 9 BIKE SPADES I 18660 sw boones ferry road tualatin� Oregon 97062 /i\ 1 SEE DETAIL SHEET 5.0' X 15.4' SIGN EASEMENT (503) 885-8605 phone brill 15�oa' I (503) 885-1206 fax I iaa �) i -- SANITARY MANHOLE 'uuIgu■■■■ `n L _ _ I ! i ! ® .raa.a.a.m.aumamaum� � RIM EL 229r2 Er .i11ii1iiiiiii11iii11 m 20.0' X 15.0' SHARED--... 15.00' iu:iuui : : ■ SIDEWALK EASEMENT ©. 0.50 X 10.00 AND TEMPLE/ASHRAM I : 20'+ /111 EUUUUUUID1 • 9 '9- N� 0 00 00 = 28� �- 2 0 im 1:::: Le f MI 111... Q �.r_ -,r --_. `dam ---� - -' ' 'i 1 X1111 ] wr/ 1 . + +s__t -' - PROPOSED ' _ ,i �,\ 1 EXISTING y o �..' UPPER LEV FF 230.0 1 kx �� _ _ _ _ _ o z O LOWER LEV FF 217.0 , I 0 t3 Le M .IiII .j_ I� __ FLO �•,� i===1 '-I — _ IE 222fi, ... . 'r` _ a n n 4 _ --- - :.. :N■ .1 �.--- - 0 9 ,9 r O CATCH BASIN 2 8,9. 8 RIM EL 221.98 \ 8 9 11 1 E < 111110111111111111111 IIIIIIIIPF, EN ■���CI EXISTING ENTRAUCE i . 6- o 1111111111111111111 *� INTO <INDER-CARE I I Q ui 4:( ...,_, zi '. ® ® (- id bwA. o,1 ■ 0 ° I zr , , Q A o()(3 o • -- 2 : ;■ ��� or■�■■�■._■i( i 2 d SUMMARY .....-____43) -,,. ,,. 2 A REMOVE EXISTING NY.�,!; SITE b,4TA r--- }� } > MOUNTED LIGHT ( I I DESCRIPTION: TAX LOTS 1400, 1500 AN10 3500 PROJECT t---1 i ( ADDRESS: 11515 S.t.,l. HALL. OUL.E 1r', Rla 7'2Cx,4�22 3, OREGON LOCATIO g o 1.-- 1: 0 sire SIZE: 2.25 ACRES MAP IS/ 3a� DA } A I CV. EXISTING � PARKING SPACES: 1 SW 'FQFFLE ST a TEMPLE SITE = 2 C2 HANDICAPPED A `` ,� scA STRUCTURE } G E / i LANDSCAPE PE /'� ( SHARED PARKING = 96 C4 HANDICAPPED, 23 COMPACT) 8(J., �-- AREA FF 219± I _ o TOTAL PARKING = 98 (6 HANDICAPPED, 23 COMPACT) o \Iv . (f) 1 i CATCH BASIN LIVING AREAS (GUEST ROOMS AND RESIDENTS ROOMS): � �. � PLAZA .p. �► E 20'+ EXISTING STRUCTURE - 516 SF L - "4 _ - - RIM EL 220.85 PROPOSED ASHRAM : 2,940 SF < (SECOND FLOOR 1-5 3'9 SF) '� Z. __ TOTAL AREA DEDICATED FOR LIVING FACILITIES = 3,456 SF G • It* N PROPOSED ASHRAM o� �� _ NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: �._ 8 , PAVING AREA = 6,`85 SF ,C Lli ;r- FF 219± (MATCH EXIST) - - - __ ROOF AREAS - -~, z EXISTING HOUSE = 1,410 SF '{C�' 4 < W. 1 : STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED ASHRAM = 1,500 SF �� `n O o rte. RIM EL 219.50 PROPOSED TEMPLE = 4,635 SF ,_.�, a_. �/_ i` 1 \) 04 TOTAL = 14,530 SF i WATER QUALIrt WALE ..... �l \. LANDSCAPED AREA = 52,145 SF ` 1-C rN T T v M A P K 0 DO T. N o V 1 1 / l f� O - 0 0 0 O G o 0' - S 8 8 0 5 3 9 i " - - 0 0 2 _ 7:34' 7 ' u � C Hir"--I CD EYNC?TES l a SITE PLAN 0 EXISTING ENTRANCE HAS SEEN RECENTLY WIDENED TO 40' ADJACENT �� ful."1" II\ 171- Uri W E ED T 0 BY D CENT OWNER t,r 0=20' OF HALL PARK OFFICE BUILDING. 6S6 cn -, I !1 2 INSTALL 10 WATT, HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM ACORN LUMINAIRE LIGHTS. POLE HEIGHT 0 Q STATEMENT OF AREA �� oTOE3E10'. EACH TO NUMBER '�'� a t`' 20 0 20 40 E LET E N MBER OF LIGHTS SHOWN WITH # SYMBOL. `- 0 DATE: 10-18-00 a TAX LOT 1400, 1500, & 3500, MAP 1St 35 DA 0 HOURS OF OPERATION SHALL ISE LIMITED TO PROHIBIT WORSHIP SERVICES FROM CO AREA OF THE PROPERTY 2.25 ACRES = 98,010.0 SFT. .. BEING HELD BEFORE 6:00 PM, MONDAYS THRU FRIDAYS WITH THE EXCEPTION PROJECT NO: 98122 OF LEGAL HOLIDAYS. ;BUILDING AREA: T FLOOR AREA.- RECEIVED PROPOSED TEMPLE... 5,501.26 SF FLOOR � SHEET NO EXISTING HOUSE(1 STORY), .1,644.75 SFT. TEMPLE LOWER LEVEL...., .. ._5,501.26 SFT. �' PART. OF THE HOUSE TO REMOVED (258.75) SFT.• TEMPLE UPPER. LEVEL... 4,630.66 SFT. JAN 0 9 22 a 2,878.38 SFT.(EXISTING + ADDITION), CITY OF MARL) al NEW ADDITION., 1492.38 .S.FT. ASHRAM 1ST FLOOR... �, PORCH FRONT & SIDE... 351 S . . ASHARAM 2ND. FLOOR- 1492.3.8 SFT. BANDING I `° 8,731.06 SFT. TOTAL FLOOR AREA... , 14.,542.68 SFT. AREA DEDICATED FOR LIVING FACILITIES °� TOTAL BUILDING AREA... cu BUILDING AREA/ PROPERTY AREA RATIO...0.089 OF LOT AREA FLOOR AREA / LOT AREA RATIO = 0.1479 IN ASHRAM BUILDING:3,357.63 SFT. ��, , ... _....�. •• ----� of ; a f vit ‘‘ ‘44. 4/44NVv41'226 -- -5 � - � 2�8. �8 = , --- \c‘)„ 1.--4--- N.4. i / .`%,, ....__ / ThR / °` a / ! 401 L , � A 1 2 W x 4 L �RE'4 V i I/.0 RI '‘_ J\ ,---- z FAR i / ‘ . , \/ ‘ \ / ■ --\ At: / 1 /--)„\ i-IR RD ' -/ 1 \ , .------- c\-4 , , EXPIRES: 12 31 02 1 ETZG R, ( d FIR \ / Q INSTALL STILLING BASIN: REVISIONS / / HAND PLACED GROUTED 1 01-10-01 / , / 40" / �‘ii <0. CLASS 50 RIP-RAP\\ / V IR ...-\'' / NA l.m cy GLASS 11I«0 OUTLET AI _`, / ------ ; RIP-RAP ■ TRUCTURE G 4 0 IE21s9.5 _ _ "" 1=IR -- r 0WER POLE 211.4 V i 40" 7 ^- J r t�} ���kW,' S=O.(�P>5ea ELEV 215,85 o - ,_ / �.-- 40 STS IN --.. 22 `� i.t...-i. I Il 1 '� �Q N , 110' , r .c9), I\ j , 111111101 _ _ , - � 4110 I4ATER QUALITY OSS-SCTIO VIEI A-A___ EXISTING \ 1 0 - Q DRIVEWAY � N.T.S. . ! z o r , , EXISTING w LEWIS & ��` ., STRUCTURE o 0 . 40" 1 DECIDUOUS ` 0 ■ 1 ` 28 0_ O __ _ 225 n \ U VAN VLEET , , -,,, -1----. 22 E 1 LANDSCAPE - `. _Dc- \. " 229` I` --- i CONSULTING ENGINEERS ` in are on 9a�fi2 18660 sw boones ferry road `°""223 - , , tualatin, 5.0' X 15.0' SIGN EASEMENT I (503) 885-8605 phone J .� i 2 226.m ; ``� ' (503) 885-1206 fax 24 r� ("..:(''7222286. 226' 224 N�M 224.P. - -` 15_00 �` ; SANITARY MANHOLE LIIII 225 .■., 224 _ _ ,, q rr k 1 1 RIM EL 229.25 I®�II!���MII��iI�11Illrl EZJ1�III211��II�►k, _ -1 -_ - , II O ,, A. N'FR �� ,, 22$.0 �IIIIIIII11111M II!IIIUI GNU■ • \ 20.0 X 15.0 SHARED - , N I ,, WATER VAULT EASEMENT , 15.00 t 0 - � r II 229. N --, 227,0 N ■ ® 223.5 ■ �, `'cv cw Cp � -..� - ,...� � SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR HALL OFFICE PARK ; ©�cv � `, ■ _ _ _` AND TEMPLE,'ASHRAM I o I i 22 N N N %► �v� xv2 i' ■ ■ - - S 0.50 X 10.00 t io ■ " , ,,, co 71'� 223 - -�_ _ ,-221 ,.�, all >, �, \ 0 o oo = -28-7. 79 - ' i , _- ...., - *71.44,7iliar;�� �� ■ 222.5 '` - \\ --; lixic ii q . \ a I-4 , (12 x_,etY' 220 PROPOSED E , M ,y0 ------ __- FF 230.0 _ ' _ 23 . . 222 ---�►.. >'v0" SANH �, \ _ -_„ _ _ _- _ ___ 'k UPPER LEVEL -� r II _ �� k ! RIM 221.9 \ �� \\ 220- IJ)222..51, II -__ __ FF 217.0 k 2� _ , LOWER LEVEL. F .. �1 ��1�------___ ��� II \\ ' �\ --1---_ ___ ��� RM 2 ,6.0 `\ � I �y I \ • 01 - --- FLOW _ _ _ -- `. 1E 222.6 I I:-), . Mill 11.11°---"r-i -n --- lb, .°� - 11. 1 IL-ii,v CATCH BASIN . _ �. p 99 - 2 g. 8�' `� , \ I-4 219 =0--- - _ ----_ ��■i■. ■ 221 ' I ,i -\ RIM EL 221.98 \ 8 9 1 - \ \\\ i \ -'‹ N. \ c 0 21' z IINPLIFIIIIIIIIIIFI � EXISTING `ENTRANCE i) i 220.'1 ! �� �, - - \ 't_ 1� I c� 230.0 �- - \\ \\\ INTO CINDER-CARE O ._ 1 • 221 \ _... 2220.1 I� \, , r I I I 21$.5 �----- _ 22014 _ 111M1111111111 N 0 ii(%!iIIIIIIIIIIIIaaas.sam.au■ y / , \,CB / ■RIM 219.8 - _ ,,_ ______-- , ,""" �� tip' • �� ,�, 22m.16 A - 220.4 E� ❑O - ___ rg " � ` ti ,,,� 219.0 .IP/ ?e .�.__ �--- _ ".•,.�..-- -( ►- 11� '�illEr VANIMI �II� m,44 '\ i' ._ - - -- '.. .' ., TOP O !BERM RIVER ROCK U i�������� !�f�tl! i ,` F 1 N,i \ ELEY 2 .0 [3H DEEP BUILDING WALL AND FOOTINGS 4) "/9.• /1 1% ,I 22P��""""' 2 PER STRUCTURAL. PLANS :X -...-1. 2193 , 1 . \ ___-- --- A. �\ 219.0 ``\ 111 \ 4 r q 0--- ► \\ O \ 1 LI \ 2A 121 `\ 0 -- __ DETRHAT�ET5 CV......_"..,....,....,.. \\\ `\ EXISTING ■o TOPSOIL LANDSCAPE \-\ - STRUCTURE -J J" `\\ JUTE MAT TREATMENT AREA AREA - -FT 219 \ `\ 2' MIN, 1' MIN. (fli \ \ i r , 1-4 ` - - CATCH BASIN \\ SODOM �, - - RIM EL 220.85 \ \ ` ` ` NOTES: 3 - - `\ 1. USE 2" - 3/4" OF RIVER RUN ROCK PLACED 3-INCHES DEEP ON JUTE MAT �/ C\ / \, ____ - 1 . 1 9 ` PLACED OVER 6-INCHES OF TOPSOIL OR BASE STABILIZATION METHOD " FA q / \N PROPOSED ASHRAM o 9 9_ `\\ `\\ AS APPROVED BY THE AGENCY/CITY. \ \ 891 11 _ `- II I \ 2. EXTEND RIVER ROCK, SUTE, AND TOPSOIL TO TOP OF TREATMENT AREA. U N co A -,.211.0 219± (MATCH EXIST) - - ' S\ \ " " 3. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PLANTING RECOMMENDATIONS IN SWALE. Iii 5 (w � A STORM `MANHOLE `` 0 Q 0. - , \\ - A RIM EL 219.50 \\ _Ii. fa 216 215 __ 216 215 Ca \\ 214 � ►,� ` _ __ WATER QUALIfl" CROSS-SECTION VIEW 5-5 - WATER QUALITY SWALE 4 214 ��► �� Q \ _I (Y. 215 �'�� ` `, N.T.S. '` 0 Ws O 216 °1 `\ OU LET ST CTURE ., O o o _ -_ o ,- R , 213.85 c a (Y. F.- ` S88°53'12" 2- - 2 - lf! , ,--1 W CD `� o S •- • � � r,A _ SITE GRADING PLAN L.G .-G-• 111 �I1�� `r' 1"=20' _------ -154---- -"` EXISTING CONTOUR LINE EXIST. NEW 1<EYNOTES: 1 c., ® ■ CATCH BASIN I,� r DATE. 10-1$-Qa0 �� --r--�"'�"15�' NEW CONTOUR LINE 20 0 20 40 0 REMOVE EXISTING CURB. MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION. c) © 0 MANHOLE i ,�15, (j co.) UTILITY POLE ®2 INSTALL HANDRAIL. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. PROJECT NO: 98122 2 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION ,� AK FIRE HYDRANT X PAVING SECTION: 3" CLASS 'C' ASPHALT 811 „� „ SHEET NO 154.5 NEW SPOT ELEVATION M © METER 8 AGGREGATE (1 0 I 7------- PROVIDE STAKE. SEE SPEC'S C © UTILITY VAULT A 0 WATER QUALITY FACILITY AS REQUIRED BY U.S.A. AND CITY OF TIGARD. 1 ELEV. ELEVATION I7 © TRANSFORMER AND PAD 13.M. BENCH MARK 0 49 VALVE BOX COVER roc TOP OF CURB - LIGHT POLE C 1 #3oC BOTTOM OF CURB - WALL MOUNTED LIGHT MH MANHOLE ' 1 \ /4_,,` OF ct3 CATCH BASIN K FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ,,irry ,%.44,worriiii S' N I "IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIjS: V)_6(" '14NT .1‘ 228. 78' '476> rs A <(5).1/49: MIIIII■ MP 'NZ4' ' I ./0,, =--r 4 0 S1/4s> '0 N 2off 27 -..,"...'''' / -ib = , ,'' FIR 1*, , 1 f- ..' I i / / 2;2'Sb.- , 0 4 4 7- V 8\ s' / NN ,4 '-'4■/111 NO *-hR I ,,,,,./ *. I , 1 )-- ••:-.) 'R.- ii R I, % -4 30 ‘94 X' N. dali\ , ET , /4 ( ' EN , 4 RES SARAkA EXPIRES: 12/31/02 4, • 7- _____/ 1 1/2" \---'s N''' 12" .....•- ‘ %. . / \ ' F6 / I t V F-I \ -I / N ,. - 7 / REVISIONS i /1\.44G I NE-4-;c, cit / i -.... \ \N\ A 1 \ / --I- \ 40" ' --.- i S, , ° a OWER POLE /1\ 0Gili-oi FIR ---\ ' y Sok 7 I 1 \ 18,, .....,-- \ i 41111111111/1114,4 . . R)R____TC.O. 11116zi.. :- 4 I 1 \ I 1 o FIR - al Li3 \\N (n10 C\I ',.:0 I d $1.. I EXIST CB al 18,I A Ai 4 I IE 219,8,5 . . EXISTING ■ - e , DRIVEWAY , ■ 1.1i o .3 III ■__ (-- 1 i . , , EXISTING 1.,..1 / , STRUCTURE 51 0 LEWIS & 401/ 1 _. : ci.. 1 , DECIDUOUS III „ 00 1 , ii4..'i 1111 ' Xe4 i i) : • N‘ 0 1 . III .■ I ■ I ,...0. I 0 < Ln c0 1 0 -H- 7- 1.11 M VAN VLEET I Li.1 F- < ILI All > CONSULTING 11 ENGINEERS i III > cx (.1.i I-- 13 1m m 5.0' X 15.0' SIGN EASEMENT I (.1.) 0 18660 sw boones ferry road tualatin, oregon 97062 FOUNDATION DRAIN Ali Nail cuA 1 < (503) 885-8605 phone c .---N ,8,1/4E1 5.00' 0 FDC . C 4 1! SANITARY MANHOLE (503) 885-1206 fax Moir- 41.1•4 ( I 0 1 RIM EL 229,25 "tflIllnIIIIMIIIMMIUMIIMIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIn 111111111111 L _ _ 'I N WATER SERVICE TO 41 II a 0 alliiiim11111111111111111111111111 III $.1) lag HALL- OFFICE PARK INCLUDE: 20.0' X 15.0' SHARED 1 5.00' a 4" ROOF DRAIN 1111112X2m11111111111 • II 1 klkATER SERVICE/UTILITIES WATER VAULT EASEMENT f.. 6° FIRE WATER FOR HALL OFFICE PARK I "...". ''''''''''.'"1...in 47::-.0.0906 II 1 III 2" DOMESTIC WATER SIDEWALK EASEMENT TO TEMPLE AND HALL OFFICE PARK AND TEMPLE/ASHRAM ^01 °'11Zit , / IN ci rallIllidtri"%tliitill111 rid 3 CV U I III 2" IRRIGATION WATER 0.50' X 10.00' INCLUDES 8" SHARED FIRE WATER ccc)N5'I :: I 1 r 0 r:=2) FOUNDATION 'RAIN re L. „El -LI_ 1-11... ritimmosusirttimm • ,.t. ri (.4 II gh LIIIMI11 I Mill I I'll 12"W *41- Ala _C) IIIIF Mum 21'a Illr liWgq N 0°0000E 287. 79' L...-J Iii, co MU 111 A, j ---;.p.aiiiiiirammummummomommummpoommummmi!.„ ry■mummalmammommiummammulommmommulimm_ ED- 1 ' . 11111-`'' ill: 'Zi; nl: k i::: - --Dw Ed. IN.. ki, U •. all Iraiz: 11.1Y alY ETV DW SW OW DW 1=4 la: tat N: IN: IN: miy7 IN: rm: I'La CD . .. fic - _.;. . ,.„ vor or+-..- 'oar Inn IL41 11•11111l " Ilri----" W Ihrl-"---77 DW-Fw D w---FIN OW t; "A---FIN DW---Fw AY T I 0 LC) \ I \ // 1 III I '-•:... 6"Fw ,I; SAN MH - - ' ri) . I EASE. #95001167 6" GRAVITY SEWER N5C.A 1 1=2:1 ,■110 PROPOSED TEMPLE . , , \ / 1 I RIM E V 221.9 -`1"-/AL C.O. C.O. 3" PRESSURE SEWER (TO HALL BUSINESS PARK) - - - S= 0.0200 uNi di. 1 UPPER LEVEL FF 230.0 A, \ • , rl . " 6" IE_I 213.1 (5) AIL • 1 _ - *C.O. _I' _ _ _ -_ _ - - - - %.0. 3" PRESSURE SEWER (TO TEMPLE) ----"' - - - _ - _ - - - (f) LOWER LEVEL FF 217.0 6 SAN/C.0.\ 111111111111 9 „ i><ISTING S a z... FOR 1 < 1-1? 1,E 213.65 \\ nimpitii) ff.9. 3 PRESSURE SEWER i f ,*EXISTING CA z Lii i& in 9 ILI FLOW i E.O.P. 1-4 EXI T CE3 < 1 i I . A11110411VA , r _ ....... , - --- „siREAINAN222m221:66.0 (.1) SR- 11111 -7,___ ■-' =, W 11 RIM 221.0 00 C-)161 AREA DR 4 - RI 216.5 EMU 11111.-"5444 tii A 1E 21 .0 \2 n ri +iii -_ W. 4" I. 215.5 ilim'aliallii IIPP.'-0100 IOU i . 7 CATCH BASIN RIM EL 221.98 ,, N89" 1 '11 E 289. 85 -) [-I . 'IA A ..< 21111ff1111111 .1t-3 gi • 2 Witspritlitswia EXISTING ENTRANCE c\I 4" IE 215. 0 0114I C.O. 11111114111115111111 li a 'N APPROXIMATE 41 ii.>(), :+i-giTwOAFTER, INTO KINDER-CARE o \ ., 1117M-,-5Ems r, ie, 111 1 . ' z \.... 4" ROOF DtZ4IN ....,,,...011•1111•■ 11 A lu- 0 ,L1% .-7- 1111111111iiiiikiiiMILIELIIIM11111111111111 ,1%, 6 ...;1' • 111 ,ill +4 III CB r ,,,g1111 CONTRACT012 TO [Lo FIELD VERIFY. o DE AR SI VEEMWEANYT w 8 II ■ #,\O No 12IM 219.5 ill 'Cd x cr Li..1 ,A in ■ 1 111 Oil OA MP O. rt. 1E211.5 < >(4tr* z ' Ike ' 0 LI.1 W -(1)milipprAmundiuminimmunimi 1..,- 4: i. . tx "ii. ctioe'• C.O. ---.11Z,1731 4 STS 111 0 -;1:17 ------C k'zi 4" ROO ID- - El I. Z 9 C.O. 91E 216.20 \1, s=e".010.11 ‘ 00 . IT,, -- 4's 0 s.0.0100 ii;., ® < ro 1 I 4., • - , ,, 1 () 1--(1) .f& I *Eh..6 CONSTRUCTIOIsi NOTES: c) co ..ii( tniq i A --.0-:1,?.4/ Q co EXISTING Ns., 0 u_i 0_ .. 1. CLEANOUTS TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS AND WHERE TURN 4" STS DOWN AT BEND TO %.9 1 IN 4" STS IE 215.62 tr, 1 STRUCTURE A ■ ' p (f) NOTED ON PLAN. I - MEET ELEVATION OF 6" STS 6" SAN IE 214.25 CD Lii , FF 21 9± 2. USE SCHEDULE 40 F'VC FOR STORM AND SANITARY SEWER LINES UNDER OR WITHIN 5' OF THE 4"STS • ........." 7 OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING OR WITH LESS THAN 15" OF COVER. ALL OTHER SEWEF2 LINES TO )1"-- 1 S=0.0100 BE F'VC 3034 MATERIAL. i Z\ 4" STS IE 214.6-1 1.0. 1 - PROVIC1 NEW 10' DRAMIAGE\ flu 2. CATCH BASIN RIM EL 220.85 ii"."... 6" STS IE 214.58 i'. • KEYNOTES: V-4 9, L I EASEMENT @ rt i; ei •,,I, CZ (,) ---1 r ...............7, PROPOSED iNSHR AM ------ ea, t-Li.....,-- 4-ti ° -0 _ 0 EXISTING SERVICES AVAILABLE TO TEMPLE SITE: 6" FIRE WATER LINE N, ci I A 6" SAN C.O. IE 214.60 FF 219± (MATCH EXIST) A /(Dm ,NM - !Mb 2" DOMESTIC WATER LINE 2" IRRIGATION LINE > r" LUZ- 1-4 4 0 STORM MANHOLE 4" PRIMARY POWER CONDUIT W 1 Z gnh ia ()(91ft RIM EL 21 9.50 2" TELEPHONE CONDUIT fn., 6" OUTFALL Nire 4P .7`fl '''. .9 _1 ° Q.) 1410_ . 4._ Nip kl 6,l_ ---\ IE IN (N 1 2") 210.75 ..- ....../ CD ,-- ® I Ih" DOMESTIC WATER METER WITH DCVA DEVICE TO SERVE TEMPLE. fa kl n IE IN (E 12") 210.85 WATER QUALITY SWALE 0 ( _ . .., I A . __. • Do 111. 0 ® NO IRRIGATION METER TO BE INSTALLED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. _I 11-1 fl_ -4 r\IY MEM a . o o - o 0 0 01.;1-ET ST--.. CTURE NEW 1:E 1:t4 a4 61 ' no A 4: ...., .... ..... , , -RI 213.85 Arki 0 PROVIDE 2" IRRIGATION STUD OFF OF DOMESTIC WATER LINE. INSTALL BACKFLOW 4 \-) WP .... ...., , DEVICE ON THE TEMPLE SITE. ,/\ X. I rc 006.. 1 213.50 w S88053'12”E 234. 78' c 1 D ® CONSTRUCT 60" DIA. SANITARY MANHOLE WITH PUMF). nivir TO 15E BIDDER DESIGN ITEM. a 1-k.' I"- _ SIT UTILITIES LEGENP______ A SEE MANHOLE DETAIL ON SHEET C-4. CONTRACTOR TO P-4,vIeE L lli tn 1 14 cp LGND-U 1.. 4011I MS SITE UTILITY PLAN CONDUIT FROM BUILDING TO PUMP. COORDINATE LOCATION OUTSIDE BUILDING ill 0 c:D WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. 45 r C,_, - •-vis/,4%1• NEW SANITARY EXIST. ..N.E. ill / 1"=20' co ® INSTALL BACKFLOW VALVE ON FOUNDATION DRAIN PRIOR NG TO c) - - - "SAN- EXISTING SANITARY g • CATCH BASIN STORM LINE. 6 -111--- WSTS - NEW STORM SEWER i • (..-. - - - *'STS - EXISTING STORM SEWER © 0 MANHOLE 20 0 20 40 ® BEGIN 4" ROOF DRAIN FOR TEMPLE. IE 221.0. A DATE: 10-18-00 - 14- NEW WATER C-0.3 gib UTILITY POLE ® BEGIN 4" ROOF DRAIN FOR ASHRAM. IE 211.0 c) W- EXISTING WATER /0\ AIIN FIRE HYDRANT c 1:)1..1• DOMESTIC WATER ® CONNECT DOWNSPOUTS TO ROOF DRAIN. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR PROJECT NO: 98122 co M c3 METER ---) 'FW• FI1RE WATER DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS DO NOT CONNECT •OWNSPOUTS TO FOUNDATION DRAIN. ' - ' ei UTILITY VAULT SHEET NO cu G dim• NEW GAS 0 BEGIN FOUNDATION DRAIN. SEE DETAIL AI , G- EXISTING GAS TRANSFORMER AND PAD itill7 cr) E• NEW ELECTRICAL 1",..;:j 9 ..-cm- ...I- LIGHT POLE 0 PLACE 1.0 cy MIN. CLASS 100 RIP-RAP AT OUTFALL. 7:3 E- EXISTING ELECTRICAL 1• ,e I cu IE INVERT ELEVATION ' I ` WALL MOUNTED LIGHT © SECTION OF STORM SEWER PIPE UNDERNEATH FUTURE BUILDING TO BE C.O. CLEAN OUT 1 I\ K '( FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SCHEDULE 40 F)VC D.W.V. C 2 cu VALVE DISCHARGE 04 MM MAN HOLE <1 DISCHARGE DOWNSPOUTS ON SOUTH SIDE OF ASHRAM DIRECTLY INTO SWALE. O-ot 0. cn CB CATCH BASIN 0 0 CLEANOUT 0 WATER QUALITY FACILITY AS REQU IR=. 5Y U.S.A. AND CITY OF TIGAIRD. A OF a, i* THRUST BLOCK _.... - - , ETol cn L. ,,,, - :00111111111111111. \-9_, 1, ' 0%, 1/ lirierjoh#Alril- (I) , I b 1 1 1.1sW CY 226 1 4',), .to 228, 78' VI -- -. -. \\ 4; e , _6(/E N. z i / .... _ ....... - , .1) I/ ....,- , , ,e,,,,, , I ••00) .- . FIR , , Qt5 4 - '4 h4 7 F4---1\A/ I /.._ , , 4...-EGO 0) - 7- / 8 / 32N, \\\ /1/ R i i_.1,' ,---- R i 4 /, , N\ ijab'.?/ „, -(- . , \\\, . • " 40*- '1Z SARA■, Is‘ \ , / 1 ■ ----\ . /2.6 Fl ol___ ,/:--- (A11111' \ \ A i ' EXPIRES: 12/31/02 11 ' \c 12" \ 4) ...._/ y2» .. / \ I / ■ \ \ IETZGER _, RES , , REVISIONS 7 \ / \ / \`■ / ... \ /0/ \ , A 01-10-01 I \ ' / 1 \ / n V \ V I 1 , , , / --\N- ,, , / 1 , 18,, .------ \ k 7s. , \ i 0 \ . . OWER POLE , • ■ 1 - \ \ \ , _---- , 57. L_Fi ,, 226 -- , , \ , ) u 0 , . / I \ - \--- -- , CN \ \ , , (-- \\\\\ , \ , \ , \ 0 ------ -- 1111 __--- _----___- -- - - - ---_ __ . NN /// \___/ ,/ , n' 1,::<° -) 7-- EXISTING DRIVEWAY , . , ■ , , \ \ \\ • • - \ 2 ) -_ \ ,-- D ___ r , , DEci ucTus / EXISTING \\\\\\\\\\\\ LEWIS Sc \ . \\ \ / 1 40" 1 , , , , STRUCTURE i. , , , , \ -3 AM 0 gl P X i L14 -- \ \ N, i I : . . . . . • . , '--- - . \ , *".--4 - ------- 225 _.: , , -- -_ . , \\ - . Lo , F- ---- \ '\\ 22 \ -, -H- \ \ 1.1.1 VAN VLEET ------__ . , \ AC)) \ -_ \ \ \ 1 P 0 LANDSCAPE --- . ' . \\ - Ct 1 Lij / --- - \ AREA -- . \ I-- / -- CONSULTIN I G \ n/n/ - ' - -- r _ _- - --- --__ \ z -' - ,- _ < , -229 ENGINEERS --- _.. - \ -- - - _ 7 -- __ _ ____ - - - __ II '-c■Ni r --_ / -, . _ __ I - __ _...._ , , - / - 1 - , . I 1 , - - - --- \ 1 / SEDIMENTATION FENCE, TYPICAL. --, ,, ,,, -_ \ 1 18660 sw boones ferry mad , , SEE DETAIL ,i,-----,..41t•- 2 .__ --- i i tholatin, oregon 97062 / \ i (503) 885-8605 phone -- 5.0' X 15.0' SIGN \EASEMENT , I , (8) r;'D N 224 -__ -- _ , , (503) 885-1206 fox , 226,0 \. - (-' V 226 NEM \ ' v - 228 221 i • 226 225 224 - _ EMIR 224.0---\ --- 224 , -,._-__ -_-_ -_ \\) '-. 4,ctki__: 15,00' _I /' Q 1 1 I SANITARY MANHOLE RIM EL 229.25 --- -_ - it6L _ _ _ III , .-7 . -- t-'-'11111410111111111111111111111111111.11111111111110ELIMMIMINIMMINIIIK els mu, k, -___ - -- -___ , il / I --__ ___ 401 y'' / 1 .I. co(N ii 0 22-.0 '- --,_ , 20.0' X 15.0' 1.-IARED 228,0 11111111111111111111111111.1111=11 \ ,223.1 III ----_ __ \ \ /I (A 01 - t\;2 \ \ Cl C't ci II 229.9 223,5/ • -)\ _),\ • --__ \ ul N -- 22-1.0 N mionmpimpum I ____ II -- SIDEWALK EASEMENT \ _- 1 01 ("A " C\I 01 1111L:LIIIIIIIIMMIll 111 .7-D6\ mom 0.50 X____10.001 \\\ IM ° - - _--- -___ 9 2(7 c.1 (A (A cA ippO 230.0 -, c\I A .1 - ___-....... 223' ■-• ----c)._ Ma -. \ \ 1 II 61 i NI l_LOO_Liit El v - -a __ 11111111111111111111111D i II A N • ni 223 _ Erta2111,... , -___ \ AND TEMPLE/ASHRAM I:I ' 1 111 -(:::: (1/ \ 0'00'00' .-_-. --27, 79' , , , , ----2-21 -- II gm n, lfr-7111,111. N , 1 --, .. 4...-........-...-7....- AIMIII1M I 0 / , 11112a224M 222.5 igampr • Aler _ / i \\ i ,_ 111111111111 RI I,. , . ,.. 7_ \ 11111 i F===1 (-,V - Mill hbM...`7:747 \\ r r ,___ - ,,, \. \\ \\\, ,,, \ --,7' 111111111111W I \ 1 , __ , \ \ \\\ \ \\\ (IA IC:r 220 PROPOSED TEMPLE -_ ,, ----_ •, 2300 *i..or-•-.:4,-,-1-,*-41' - 6.10114 SAN_MI-I \ \ \ \ \ - __ , \ \ CA 220- 11, ---- ---- - -- --- --- --LtPPER--LEVEL FF 230.0 LOWER LEVEL FF 217.0 ---,1-1\--:\11111111 1 ra 747 15 RIM 221.9 let,"*A-410,- '1 ,. , \ t x i - , . --- - -__ _ _7 - .... \\ \ \ - \ \ . \ \ \ -i 10 \ ■ (__7,1 ' I ,/ • iiisiigi Sr lr Nr A N' GRAVEL CONSIRLACTION ENTRANCJE. -, - - --__ - sAN\MH . . .N 1 - I . -_ __ ___ _ _ _ , - , =1 LLJ 1°° . , NM 410- . -- ,..... 011 _ ,, \ - - - - - - - - --, . \ \ . FLOW , I \• 1.111114-po, . II / --- -- - - ---- 7.TIA1:1-.."Et_ . . ") -: ,., ni \ - 1-. _ IIIIII ,-- CATCH BASIN ) »_._ N 8 90-r1-11 ,_ \ ' \ RIM \.ef)3.,° \ , \ \ \ \\ \ 219 b- ---------- ---- ---- ,' RIM EL 221.98 , , 1 _ 219 111W, -- 1 ,-, ISIMPUM11111111! II - : s iffif4sLL-E ' ' 1 ,, / , \\\ \\ , EXISTING \ENTRAN\CE \\ \\ \ , I , milim.■_ ...•-• inn • - -__ 220.1 , 1 -11111 _____ . . , , - , , , Z P , . , , ''44-4-----NN- -----f-\:---.2\89. a,:' , . C\I ■ , 1111.11.5 230.0 -, imunial- ---\ , \ , NTO <INDf.R-COf , 215.5' .3117:1711111111 III L--,.221 0 . , -. , \ \ . \ , . = \_____yr:220.1 INR 220.14 , .N , \ \\ , 0 p , , , , , z , ' ___ Wall EMI rdi -_ ___ , , , , I , , , , , _ . ,,,., IIIIIIIIIIIIIMIMIIIIIAIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIMI-IMIIIII- nrr_.,...rvrw_ lr!_ _ AL MI - _,, Ow= \ (k "I r i_o --1 III '\ , ._ ----o ---- - -. 225.0 .-- - olikbp4.4 SEE !!4a1G-11'^ - = C-4. -6 •II C5 ii RIM 219.8 , .-- - - •_._ - EROSION CONTROL. FLAN - STANDARD NOTES ERO-NOTS .-- or -- -_ _ la 616 / 220.16 §11Tr- 220,4 Ell ' CO - -_ .:b il: Do ___ III°`/------_ ,--- - _ RECOMMENDED STANDARD NOTES FOR EROSION CONTROL PLANS d _ , (FROM TECHNICAL GUIDANCE HANDBOOK, REVISED FEB. 1994) 2A 8 , _ -------_----- -_ n, 7 ii:11111 219.0 II-1/ e z ' +Immufammumniusormsillin/10-44 '\\ , , -__ - ___ 220.0 ■1/ ■ / 220 ii■- 22a. \ , , A. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION/SEDIMENTATION K. STORM DRAIN INLETS, BASINS AND AREA DRAINS SHALL 5E PROTECTED ...A •NIMIIIIIIIN 4 P Q/ 7.10 I% 'I' \ -. \ CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION (ANY TIME OF THE YEAR) PER THE UNTIL PAVEMENT SURFACES ARE COMPLETED AND/OR VEGETATION (..) /9' / 219.5 , - , r \-:I% N 0, _r_,_ -,,, \ , \ "EROSION PREVENTION" AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS TECHNICAL IS RE-ESTAIBLISHED. -- \ GUIDANCE HANDBOOK DATED FEBRUARY 1994 AND UNIFIED SEWERAGE \ -- -, \ '--_ N L. PAVEMENT SURFACES AND VEGETATION ARE TO BE PLACED AS RAPIDLY - \ 219.0 \ I I 1 , AGENCY'S DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, RE) 96-44, CHAPTER 8. -_ ---__ __ \ \ AS POSSIBLE. 1 CV _, \ _7 , _ 1i 2-A / ----- \\ \ \\ CD \ ■ 5. APPROVAL OF THIS EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (ESC) PLAN DOES M. SEEDING SHALL BE PERFORMED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 1 FOR EACH \ \ 0 CV 1---- \ ----- -- -'''- ----214---, . _- ----- _ \ NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ROAD OR DRAINAGE PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. , 11 '.,..- \\ , D(ISTING -__ _, , , \ ---__ _ _ ,,, , , \ DESIGN (E.G., SIZE AND LOCATION OF ROADS, PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS, RETENTION FACILITIES, UTILITIES, ETC.) N. IF THERE IS EXPOSED SOILS OR SOILS NOT FULLY STABILIZED FROM I 7 _- LANDSCAPE --- AREA \\\\ , '---___ ___ __ STRUCTURE -- -FT 21 ± -----__ , , \ , ............ . , t-- ---- - O z \\ \ , \ \ \ \\ \ \ , \ C. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE ESC PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, REPLACEMENT, AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR NOVEMBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30, THE WET WEATHE1R EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WILL 5E IN EFFECT. SEE SECTIONS 3.3.1 AND 3.3,8, TECHNICAL GUIDANCE HANDBOOK, FOR REQUIREMENTS, in (..) \ --__-_,.., \ \ --- 1:9\- CATCH BASIN \ , UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND APPROVED AND 0. ESC MEASURES SHALL 5E REMOVED B'r THE DEVELOPER 1-11-4EN VEGETATION , \ - \ , VEGETATION/LANDSCAPING IS ESTABLISHED. IS FULLY ESTABLISHED. (...) . , t_-_, - _ \ RIM EL 220.85 \ \ Ofr / , , ,,,,,_ - , . , - - , \ \ \\ \ D. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL P. E.C. HOTLINE 844-8444, CALL PRIOR TO ANY WORK. ei I \ t_---- , , \ BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DURING ".....,,,,, ik. n , , N _ _ , - - 1 1-t)--' , , \ \\ \\ THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, NO DISTURBANCE !BEYOND THE STANDARD NOTES FOR SEDIMET•IT FENCES: 1 cl > 1---- -- PROPOSED ASHRAM „_ , N8901 11 -_-__ \ , , , \ FLAGGED CLEARING LIMITS SHALL SE PERMITTED. THE FLAGGING SHALL. BE MAINTAINED 5Y THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR FOR THE 00, ,,, - --, , , , .... - 1. THE FILTER FA5RIC SHALL 5E PURCHASED IN A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT Wfr 51 z 0 n N. N ---- FF 219± (MATCH EXIT) DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 1/ ■ N, .21,0 \ -- -\ 4**;- . A , , STORM MANHOLE \ TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID USE OF JOINTS. WHEN SOINTS ARE NECESSARY, FILTER CLOTH SHALL 5E SPLICED TOGETHER 0 1-s \ \ E THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MUST 5E CONSTRUCTED IN el f".4 ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST, WITH A MINIMUM 6-INCH OVERLAP, AND SEDIMENTATION FENCE, TYPICAL. , _ cc_ 216 215 - 216 --., 215 214 '', --' i'--_ ' RIM EL 2\19.50 \ \\ CONjUNCTION WITH A1-.1- CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES, AND IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT AND SEDIMENT-LADEN 50TH ENDs SECURELY FASTENED TO THE POST, OR OVERLAP 2" X 2" LU D - 4.,4 , \ WATER DO NOT ENTER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM, ROADWAYS, OR VIOLATE POSTS AND ATTACH AS SHOWN ON DETAIL. ,_ SEE DETAIL SHEET C-4. WATER QUALITY SWALE 215 214 1 ---, (-CI 00 \ , \\ \ \ APPLICABLE WATER STANDARDS. 2, THE FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL 5E INSTALLED TO FOLLOW THE 'Kt 0 -_ 216 ', \ \ h ..,..;-.- ...., 0 allia4 \ 4 1.11 \ OUTLET STRUCTURE \ , CONTOURS WHERE FEASIBLE. THE FENCE POSTS SHALL 5E SPACED A - " lor - Isr 40 - lor - "gy A 1r A. II ''. lov 40 - Ilr - ■ - III -II III . 11PF ■ ■ --- 0 - 0 1111111VVV"Ir :- 'RIM 213.85 N. . F. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE THE MINIMUM MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART AND DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND A a Q , 4: _ __r, ........ , . .... - , _ _ 0 -_, -,_ . REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. DURING THE MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES. LS- ______ _- , S88°53'12"1 2-3-4-7 A2--_ - - 4 0 • (i) -_ -, --__ - --. -- , CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, THESE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED AS 1 _ -i\ - I \, NEEDED FOR UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS AND TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT 3. THE FILTER FABRIC SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM VERTICAL BURIAL OF 6 W in LA kn CD AND SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER DO NOT LEAVE THE SITE. INCHES. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL FROM FILTER FABRIC FENCE cD CN.1 SITE GRADING LEGPsiP INSTALLATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED ALONG THE co I-GNVP-GRIV) 1111r6 EFROSION COtkliFZOL FLAN G. THE ESC FACILITIES SHALL 5E INSPECTED DAILY BY THE ENTIRE DISTURSED AREA. ,--, - --- -- 154--- --- EXISTING CONTOUR LINE EXIST. .N.E. Iii l" 2Ø' APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO INSURE eD THEIR CONTINUED FUNCTIONING, 4. STANDARD OR I-4EAVY DUTY FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL HAVE 6 g a CATCH BASIN 10 r MANUFACTURED STITCHED LOOPS FOR 2" X 2" POST INSTALLATION. DATE: 10-19-00 ,---, ______-- ---155------._ NEW CONTOUR LINE 20 0 20 40 H cz) • H . THE ESC FACILITIES ON INACTIVE SITES SHALL 5E INSPECTED AND STITCHED LOOPS SHALL 5E INSTALLED ON THE UP HILL SIDE OF THE © MANOLE ,-, (If MAINTAINED A MINIMUM OF ONCE A MONTH OR WITHIN THE 24 HOURS SLOPED AREA. V CaD Clib UTILITY POLE FOLLoWING A STORM EVENT. PROJECT NO: 98122 62. ro --) N'y EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION /0\ AIN FIRE HYDRANT 5, FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL 5E REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED x I. AT NO TIME SHALL MORE THAN ONE FOOT OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO -to THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE, 1BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPSLOPE AREA HAS BEEN SHEET NO cp 154.5 M co METER ACCUMULATE WITHIN A TRAPPED CATCH BASIN. ALL CATCH BASINS AND PERMANENTLY PROTECTED AND STABILIZED. NEW SPOT ELEVATION . . CONVEYANCE LINES SHALL 5E CLEANED PRIOR TO PAVING. cn / PROVIDE STAKE. SEE SPEC'S y 5 UTILITY VAULT THE CLEANING OPERATION SHALL NOT FLUSH SEDIMENT-LADEN 6. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL 5E INSPECTED BY If] hi TRANSFORMER AND PAD WATER INTO THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM. APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT ELEV. ELEVATION .71 5.M. BENCH MARK 0 0 VALVE BOX COVER J. STABILIZED GRAVEL ENTRANCES SHALL 5E INSTALLED AT THE LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS c_.) SHALL 5E MADE IMMEDIATELY. cu \I, NI/ BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF c-Q TOG TOP OF CURS .-1=1- ..411•* LIGHT POLE C 3 c73 1 BOTTOM OF CURB /i\ IN THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY 5E REQUIRED TO INSURE 50C WALL. MOUNTED LIGHT THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE „ MH MANHOLE ' I \ /1. PROJ'ECT. OF (-1 CB CATCH BASIN < < FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (- 1 (2'8 0-) --- LI: B 1 45,g5) PRop.- A illinal „ fifpv 1 4 ii-ayi _ LANDSCAPE AREA 6„ --•■••=min DITCH , ce,,O 3o, _,..., NEW TOPSOIL LANDSCAPE AREA NEW TOPSOIL II SA R At-k I 5'-0" U.N.O./ / EXPRES: 202 1 SLOPE 2% (MAX) •.• , REVISIONS \ 11 ----=-7:111 :11E1111i1E-11 4 4 • II-111 .41-Ill- II- A 01-10-01 • • ,i 1 1E- 1 I HE-i B E-----ii 1E-1 1 1=1 1 1E-11' 9 0.. N' • 4 "11E- iEl I 1=1 1 11-- PLAN ,.-° t',.% , 1 `8,0 '11E-1 IIE-ii 1E-11 ,,,, 6. .. . A r V MAX 30 ,\ . MIN 10 muj .' t7 vt . / •.. 4 • OF COMPACTED CRUSHED ROCK BASE /\//„// " 1%. ' < 4 -(2.< DITCH tbM 77 . •••4 'cli-- r---- 10 i COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4" 6" • ., I-EV 213.85 ', : r 6" \I '•" ii— STS .• \t STS il Ir—, -- -..-— . .1 A • 'ci. ' N----" ..; . GROUND ELEVATION --,---4--- - .1' Ogiril- .;7. .. . a. • ,. SEE GRADING FLAN LANDSCAPE AREA NEW TOPSOIL • • CO m . ..* 5'-0" U.N.O. A ..' . .. • p • r- u.9 • •.1! . . • . V D c, rf:9 • • •• • 0 '''' • ' .. TOOLED 44 , „. ..44. ,,4 . . 4.. . ,„:, . co .4 . • ' • 'N7 6•• 4 . st*.'sk • 4•• , • • • bo " 4% . .4.:. - SLOPE 2% (MAX) -.•.°‘ r A 't•• - • • • 4 -4,^ •. •• 11 •11•• • •. — •,4 - o. , EDGE - C,jo .. .• WALL F'ER •., Se-- 09,,:c9 .' - •. - t4 : STRUCTURAL 6" 2'-0" 6" 6"- 2'-3 OF DRAIN ROCK -lb- ov.<9 °,9 . • • ' PLANS =II 1E1117=111E111E I 4 1 '4) i0 .6. - * • I 1E1 I 1E1 I 1E1 I 1=1 II . 41-' 2 4.% . . • •4.: 7=11.1E-IIIEHIS-11' .° SECTIO\1 A—A SECTION B—B . .. o . I 1=1 I I:__IIIEI ' a „ ''' is - u , 6, • ., LEWIS SC • =IIE-11J-1,11' ao ' • - '290.6? • ...: . Y\,/\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ V V V/Y 04 REINFORCEMENT FER „,...„;:,„ . ,.. . FILTER---„,,.. • 0`.Z. ,,, .. ;••,.. STRUCTURAL PLANS FABRIC .. • ..• • s/„ -, ,,\ \\., ,\\," A 4" OF COMPACTED terS 4 .-943. t,4 4. p•,..., '.'•'••••; ' CONCRETE SLAB pER CRUSHED ROCK BASE sy5,'\..,,,,,;\\", N' , \\\\.,,,,),• N.- NOTES: ScPc_ 44 ,..A4. STRUCTURAL. PLANS \N ,<\A A '\ LIIII) • DITCH INLET CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-478 9,., • .. i ". COMPACTED SUBGRADE / 6" .- • • •. - 8" OF 3/4" COMPACTED BASE MATERIAL .4 . - . . . ,•- • 9'9 9'9 9',9 ASPHALTIC PAVING AND BASE ROCK 9.9 Q• •• ' .\' V. '''''%i'• '6' q0• '''6• SEE SITE PLAN FOR DEPTH VAN V L E ET SO ,D. cci . u . PRECAST = MINIMUM WALL THICKNESS TO BE 5" 04 " 4" DIA. PERFORATED DRAIN o4 G4 . • * ' ••, REINFORCEMENT TO BE REBAR MEETING ASTM A615 GRADE 60 OR WELDED LINE. EXIT INTO STORM 09:9 ' • • • • '.-• ..* •• NOTES: 1. SLOPE ALL WALKS 2% (MAX) AWAY FROM BUILDING(S) U.N.O. WIRE MEETING ASTM A497 CONSULTING DRAIN SYSTEM - DO NOT WALKS APART FROM BUILDING(S) SLOPE TO ONE SIDE. ENGINEERS CONNECT TO ROOF DRAINS. ,411, . ....,... •..!--lje'.:''. : . , • • • • 2. PROVIDE NEATLY TOOLED CONTROL JOINTS AT 5'-0" ON CENTER. - -1=111 -.., E---- E .77 FOOTING PER NOTLT. NOT TO SCAL_• _ STRUCTURAL PLANS 3. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS AT 30'-O" ON CENTER AND AT WALK INTERSECTIONS. 18660 sw boones ferry road tualatin, oregon 970 2 (503) 885-8605 phone 4 FOUNDATION DRAIN DEITAI — 040 SI1DEWALK !TAIL ,41 WATER QUALITY SWALE OUTLET (503) 885-1206 fax 0 . .4 C4-1 1/2" = 1'-0" C4-3 1" = 1'-04 C-SWOUT N.T.S. 2" THICK, 30000 P.S.I. GRAY IRON, , 0 HEAVY DUTY CAST IRON GRATE. 'c 1110 'S...\ 4c cps\ RIM ELEVATION es/ SEE PLAN ' • •< •6' 0'1 -,„4:t k 4v. -t_(-) 'fq"' 0 • o .a(N„L er.■ .. CP' ''• '1 ,'kg t>r7o. 1.981 tso, .. 00P 0„1,,,. k. \ \ ' fc.%•Q 130 '*rt?-\-) IA * I PIPE INVERT 74:; t>o,S)' 'Q'c'; '=°,, . (340 ci'4.. aco SEE PLAN ' . .'",3 ) '' •• - t:) 1.:6 ':6.‘ 6'0, 'igi.41..p-• ' 2.t. CI. C'4 tO t .■ r- RADIUS = 25' MIN. . ; tti.,, • m OIL TRAP WITH 4" -N\ _ _ CLEANOUT PLUG CLEAN PIT RUN OR 8" MIN. ,,, Wx2" SQUARE EDGE 21-MINUS GRAVEL. DEPTH t \ / F1-AT 15AR SUBGRADE REINFORCEMENT 24" GEOTEXTILE, AS REQUIRED PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF NOTES: ,o_ RIM ELEVATION AR INGRESS/EGRESS EA A- CATCH BASIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF 10 GAUGE (MINIMUM) STEEL \ fl ' DI---"A` SEE PLAN WITH ALL JOINTS WELDED. CATCH BASIN CAN BE ROUND OR SQUARE. B- CALK PIPE TO CALKING HUB. ':.4 ANGLE 50TH ENDS OF FILTER FAE3RIC oljp GRAVEL. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE c__ SET CATCH BASIN ON 6" THICK COMPACTED CRUSHED \ FENCE TO ASSURE SOIL IS TFRAPPED a 0/ A ERO-ENTR 1/2" - 11-0" D- BROCK OR SAND BASE. E- DRILL AROUND CATCH BASIN WITH COMPACTED CRUSHED ROCK. RILL (3) 1" DIA. HOLES IN TOP OF BASIN EACH SIDE. ID ■4\ "gr, --1fj+-PIFE INVERT OIL TRAP w 1 SEE 47-AN INTERLOCKED 2" x 2" POSTS ri-----Pr" r III4M111.rallMpppill NI'al.:74 1:-."Ei"islilt::.: ............r.=..,....,=;,V 9 4 CATCH !BASIN DETAIL CIV-C15 1/2" = 1'-o" ...._..„, / 12" / NN CLEANOUT PLUG 10 GA STEEI- AREA RAIN I. lwawilill". AND ATTACH 111111111111111111 , . ,t, —_....-..--.....-...- ,.... ilii . 131131,1111t, CAN 15E ROUND LU TOF VIE glifild ii,,,,,,.,... 1,,,,...m. A MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER DIR SQUARE. Illitik 1111111 10101 k milimIIIIIIt littrig 1 ,fluili0111111 1 pilmiaing Jai h<1 In FILTER FABRIC MATERIAI- iiiiiiIiiiiiii'l::-7-7-72 -1"--!--1 ii ME 1111l.itrl!l'............._1NIteng' GROUT 36" WIDE ROLLS ilmilwrid;:rii..F.-::::••••-••••:....44:i1.11,,,,m1,119 Alin "4"-imiti:•:,' Alt =.:::!::-.;..5'. ,:-7.t..V.:77,Z77-..iii,,,ii-;,..,,:,z,I.V. VIN",174":■''''''IM'', FINISH GRADE 4" PRECAST CONCRETE 01111 AREA DRAIN DETAIL. Ifi _ _ 41...0.01;•,,,ilf.1....-:-.1r.,-,=..E.--:,:m, ;11!....,,..,v, (SEE PLAN) i V,-r=iiiiii liso6;1-,?' A „!,,,...1..vn ,,,:,...,----.7.:-.r..,:-. .,,,,,,.!----, ...t4f.,1;....,..-;.-..-1---.,,F...=.1=;• EXTENSION RINGS. if) _.•. __----,..--...... _____• ••• -- '':-_,E-----t-_-_:-.-,-2:-,-_---_-.7 (3) RINGS MAXIMUM OR 04-11 ill ...., ii_of ''':',,41,4?Mc,'\,,•*/ , \'V, , ,`' ',"4*.s5A,.. NI .. m -.• 1 !•-: 12" EXTENSION MAXIMUM. I -, ,,,,,,5,,,,,,.„04 .,,,,,,,,,W. )r,',,, -..•:,,0`7,X,\>-,<.,'i2 ,,,>K2 '.>>1>;>•"1." ;%`, . ,4,,,,,,A,4.:,5,,,,,,X.,s >,•,;.p ,,,'',,i,', .,'''.,*,(K*7,,c,,,\W<. ,,s.,,y'4%-.`,,,D.LN'Ast.,,,,, --.<,,,,Y 1 e,,,,,,';‘,,,, ,`<c,'--4, ''',3,1,;,'''';‘:0->'..ftt,W''X<):.k,4" O;WW.''"W`)\ CURE INLET CATCH BASIN 20 • .‘. .". ECCENTRIC MANHOLE TOP tafi . . . , , , , ,,.,,,,,.' ,/,..—, 4y' ',,,,$,','>'.:4 • 'z',I,>,,,x.^-5$?■VA, 6,,"`s'a'70''. '‘'x.-.;,,k -w5\,‘ ,,-,, NTS NTS 'iv • . • • . 'n"`Y-*W ,••/>\We•'56<s ''', .:, ‘4>r,,';'•<k e:Xs%.,,'%/: <,,r' \?:4:144,e ir',k^,,,, . . .. . , ,N,,,,,, ,,,„„y„,,,,,,>,,,„,,,'C'Re,C. y ,,',G.' :11711"11.1117 . . ..* •-• NOTES: ...1 y 2,\'''',,: ',, &-?./,‘"',,,:r,5,'Xi..1* '''4e....;/,/.% % ',>''''-'c,:-- ''x''''..k:':,1-4;>,).-; <\'< , • " -* 1. PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS .1- A • -rAzz ,e , / , / / / / ,/ / / •,ift■ii.4- ■ A 1\ A\ A\ ,\ A\ A\ A\ A\ A\ ,\ '\ r.\ A\ ,.. iiiii'47K/: 2N • L STANDARD M.H. STEPS - tb TO CONFORM TO ASTM C-478. '0w ll./44,f,„#4,', ,tikovei , . . I . IN 2. ALL POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE ,woke .. . ;, Li % )t=>" 14#11,,,„," „ittpitti• 1 0, . SHALL HAVE A 28 DAY STRENGTH "..... .%,... , , ,....., -L.,...r"---•-- OF 3,000 P.S.I. AND 2" TO 4" SLUMP. 1 (N timml."- _l 6' MAXIMUM SPACING ,,;..:;, 3. ALL JOINTS TO BE RAM NEK JOINT / 7.0' / > " . A :.- . A • :. . :iiiili:iii MATERIAL OR BETTER. 1.11 , FRONT VIE1--1 ill =III iiiE /FLOW • . .... 4. PIPE HOLE LOCATIONS AND SIZES AS ('---------- 0 r" -.-":-.-- (-1----- LU \ / PER PLANS. 8" MIN. BETWEEN HOLES. 0 z \2'' f5Y 2" FIR OR PINE POSTS, III libleirlirm, ,,iittituv, ,,,.,.,,,,,Rt. —I V\ ..• , .. 0 0 --I ill 0 CI STANDARD OR BETTER OR ,, ,,,,,..41 - ., ,.. 1, u • . .1----- PRECAST REINFORCED b U-I EQUAL ALTERNATE: 60" TONGUE AND GROOVE tri -1 FENCE POSTS POSTS ,••;;K*'\, .... •.: PL-AN ikt,,,\14, . MANHOLE SECTIONS C--i \VP,,i‘to, • . • ettov,\,, 1 j • . TONGUE AND GROOVE JOINT :-..'c:\'`14.) ,.._}_) 42. i is STITCHED LOOPS TO ME i, r:‘,..44,..\,‘„ a USE STITCHED LOOPS "n",'. ...v.: -‘-:i•-.: INSTALLED ON UPHILL wf,-;,..,-,.-•-., .. OVER 2" X 2" POSTS (II SIDE OF SLOPE % .•• .. 3,4,, DIA. GALVANIZED IRON ". ': t• • T. .. 2:.:. . * '' : ' q 1 i ...._j.. STEPS 8'' DEEP x 12" WIDE 1,11 ,, 1-4 .-- . , i .. , ,.....-.::-... FLOW WITH 2" DROP. EMBEDDED 4...wad..,...•- 0 0 .....i.. • RI FILTER FAIBRIC 1. tt !Amp!, . . 3" AT 12" 0.C. TYPICAL --4,-,•„,.. ...k.'........... .,—, in MATERIAI-- -N't•I , ..v DITCH BOTTOlvi 6" 5"6 112" , .., y .• • (:) BURY BOTTOM OF ,; ,/,X r •• POURED CONCRETE BASE 0 ' : FILTER MATERIAL 4 /A AM 0 A . • •• (5) SACK MIX KEYNOTES THIS DETAIL: , •.; ,...75, IN 8" 1BY 6" TRENCH \\\\/1 i\- .‘//-;,0,/,, , LINIIIIIIMMIIMIlai #,.... .p.4 ; :. :.:. •• • • . . .. 2500 psi AT 28 DAYS •.•.• . ., .. • 0 1/2" DIAMETER STANDARD PIPE. SHOP PRIME WITH ZINC DATE: 10-143-00 —..........— 'vf'\ OXIDE PRIMER. PAINT AFTER INSTALLATION WITH OIL BASED COMPACT ALL AREAS OF \'\■\\/, j, . . • . • • • . F., 0 v 'Qv t,V v 9 v ‘4,.__________- 6" COMPACTED ENAMEL. COLOR PER OWNER. FILTER FABRIC TRENCH ` /4\/, SECTION A-A ,30 r,' tt,,0 cs,.-7 c)o 0 GRAVEL BASE PROJECT NO 9E3122 all 0 STANDARD 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK. 5-D° Q t 6 Ka• 0 ' ' < 3/4" - 0" AT 90% sirDE VIEki MIN. - DITCH INLET COMPACTED 0 6" x 6" x 1/4" STEEL BASE PLATE WELDED TO PIPE ENDS. SHEET NO -g NTS 0 SET PIPE ENDS IN 12" x 12" x 12" DEEP CONCRETE FOOTING. c2n SEDIMENTATION FENCE a INLET 5ARRIER (510—BAGS) 10 60" 'DIAMETER MANHOLE oill DIKE RACK (c1 SPACES) C 4 „,- A ERO-SP 1/2" = 1'-a" 4 ER0-815 3/4" . 1.-9 A c4-9 1/2" = II-0" A A BKRACK-3 1/2" = 11-0'i c% Cu OF Fog .. .c:n Li: • 1 PIi97 I PlaAK ( vi5 : y • ' , , .Bralimapremananda Ashram and Temple ' - Application for Planned Unit Development and Minor Modification to Existing Conditional Use Permit , • I5 ' •■ 0 • I Applicant: - Swami Visvapremananda I 11515 SW Hall Blvd. . Tigard, OR 97223 • • Applicants . I Representative: Alpha Engineering, Inc. 9600 SW Oak Street, #230 Portland, OR 97223- RECEIVED P .ANNl - (503)452-8003 I . _ Tom McConnell/ Shelley Holly •JUL 1 6 2001 - • CITY OF 1 Y4,QARD ,Il . . . PDMOOI-Axv3 I I Brahmapremananda Ashram and Temple - Application for Planned Unit Development and Minor Modification to Existing Conditional Use Permit I I f I I I Applicant: Swami Visvapremananda 11515 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 111 Applicants Representative: Alpha Engineering, Inc. 9600 SW Oak Street, #230 Portland, OR 97223 (503) 452-8003 Tom McConnell / Shelley Holly v l 1 t t LETTER ADDRESSING COMPLETENESS ISSUES V s ALPHA ENGINEERING, INC. 1 June 12, 2001 Kevin Young, Associate Planner City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Response to Completeness Review Letter—Brahmapremananda Ashram and Temple Dear Kevin: 1 The following addendum has been prepared to respond to items listed in the City's Notice of Incomplete Application letter dated May 18, 2001. II1. The applicant is required to submit an application to add a PD overlay zone to the base C-P zoning 1 RESPONSE: Per your meeting with Sam Adettiwar, Geostandards Corporation, it was decided that this item was no longer necessary as a part of the current application. I 2. Provide updated information on the use, square footage and building elevations for the revised proposal. I RESPONSE: We have provided the attached materials to reflect the current proposal for this site. I 3. Provide a more detailed narrative to accompany the application materials I including minor modification to a conditional use and a planned development. I. RESPONSE: The applicant has provided the attached narrative addressing the criteria for a minor modification to a conditional use and a planned development. I 4. Provide an impact study per Section 18.390. I 1 I Plaza West • Suite 230 • 9600 SW Oak • Portland, Oregon 97223 Office 503-452-8003 - Fax 503-452-8043 •Nsww.alpha-eng.com • RESPONSE: The applicant has provided the attached impact study in compliance with Section 18.390. 1 5. Provide revised plans with calculations in regards to the amount of landscaped area and impervious surface. RESPONSE: The applicant has provided a revised site plan that provides a summary section with calculations for landscaping area(52,145 square feet) and impervious area (14,530 square feet). 6. Provide full-size plans. RESPONSE: The applicant has provided the attached full-size plans, which are to scale. 7. Revise plans to illustrate off-site parking spaces. RESPONSE: The site plan has been revised to show the parking. The applicant has a shared parking agreement with the owner of the Hall Business Park. The site plan provides a summary of the parking spaces. 8. A lighting plan is needed to show how the site will be lighted. RESPONSE: The site plan has been revised to illustrate the location of lighting on the site. The proposed light locations are represented by keynote (2) on the site plan. The lights will be placed on kept to no more than 10 feet in height to avoid spillover glare on to adjoining properties. The nearest light fixtures are more than 35 feet from adjoining property. 9. Provide a tree survey and tree preservation plan. RESPONSE: The revised site plan and landscape plan reflect the location of existing trees on the site. No trees will be impacted by this proposal. In fact the revised site plan preserves trees that were planned for removal under the previous application for this site. Though no trees will be removed, the applicant will be planting new I 2 trees on the site as a part of the landscape plan to provide perimeter buffering to the adjoining land uses. I 10. Please clarify which tax lots are included on the development site. RESPONSE: The subject site is comprised of Tax Lots 1400 and 3503 on Tax Map 1S1-35DA. The submitted plans have been revised to correct this. 1 11. The submitted plans should show the location of the property lines which divide the development site. RESPONSE: The revised plans have been updated to show the existing property lines on the development site. I hope these additional materials are helpful towards the City's review of this application. We believe this addendum responds to all the items identified in your letter dated May 18, 2001, and provides the information necessary to be deemed complete and begin the City's processing of this application. Please feel free to call me if Y ou have any question regarding these additional materials at 503-452-8003. Sincerely, ALPHA ENGINEERING, INC. I' 72? ) cec Thomas McConnell, AICP Planning Manager I C I I 3 1 1 1 t 1 1 i. UPDATED NARRATIVE FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE i I FACT SHEET Proiect Name: Swami Viswa Premananda Temple Addition Proposed Actions: Minor Modification to Conditional Use Permit Planned Unit Development Tax Map: 1S135DA Tax Lots: 1400 and 3503 Site Size: 2.25 acres Location: The subject site is located at 11515 SW Hall Blvd. The subject site can be further identified as Tax Lots 1400 and 3503 on Tax Map 1S1-35DA. r Zoning:C-P Professional Commercial(City of Tigard) Owner/Applicant: Swami Viswa Premananda 11515 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Applicant's Representative: Alpha Engineering, Inc. Tom McConnell and Shelley Holly(Planners) 9600 SW Oak Street, Suite 230 Portland,OR 97223 503.452.8003 1 I I I I I I Tigard Ashram and Temple 1 Alpha Engineering,Inc. I VICINITY& SITE INFORMATION I Site Location The site is bordered north and east by property zoned C-P and are currently developed with an office complex and a daycare center. The property to the south is zoned R-12 and developed with and apartment complex and the property to the west is zoned R-4.5 and developed with single family residences. Existing Uses The site is currently developed with a residential house. Proposal The proposal of this application is a minor modification to the existing CUP 1999-00001 which allows for the development of a religious institution in a C-P zone, including an Ashram of 4,840 square feet and a Temple of 9,000 square feet. The modified proposal is to continue to use the existing residence as an Ashram(residential dormitory for Monks)and expand it for a total of 3,456 square feet to allow for 2 full-time residents bedrooms and 8 guestrooms. The proposal also involves the construction of a two-storied Temple consisting of approximately 4,635 square feet per floor. Additionally,this application includes a request for a second Planned Development Concept Plan and Planned Development Detailed Plan approval to reflect proposed changes. Topography In general,the site is generally flat but slopes slightly downhill from north to south. Vegetation 1 There are trees on the site,with a larger concentration on the north side of the site. The development has been situated in such a way as to preserve all existing trees. I I I I Tigard Ashram and Temple 2 Alpha Engineering, Inc. I. NARRATIVE ADDRESSING MINOR MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Chapter 18.330 CONDITIONAL USE 18.330.020 Approval Process B. Major modification of approved or existing conditional use. 1. An applicant may request approval of modification to an approved plan by: a. Providing the Director with five copies of the proposed modified conditional use site plan; and The applicant is providing five copies of the proposed modified conditional use site plan along with this narrative. Ib. A narrative addressing the proposed changes as listed in subsection B below. This narrative will serve to address the proposed changes as required by subsection B below. 2. The Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: a. A change in land use; This modification does not request a change in land use. The previously approved CUP was to allow a religious institution in a C-P zone. The land use is still proposed for a religious institution. This criterion is not applicable to this modification request. b. An 10%increase in dwelling unit density; Changes requested are related to the temple design,not dwelling unit density. While there is a proposed dwelling unit as addressed in the Planned Development Concept Plan, this criterion does not apply to it because: 1)The Conditional Use Permit only addresses the allowance of a religious institution in a C-P zone, and 2)there is no increase in the dwelling unit density. This criterion is not applicable to this modification request. c. A change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; There is no change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas where off -site traffic would be affected. This criterion is not applicable to this modification request. d. An increase in the floor area proposed for non-residential use by more than 10%where previously specified; Tigard Ashram and Temple 3 Alpha Engineering, Inc. I IThe floor area proposed for non-residential use has increased by 135 square feet per floor for a total increase in floor area of 270 square feet. The Temple, as originally proposed, I had 9,000 square feet of floor area. This represents an increase of 3% in floor area proposed for non-residential use; therefore this criterion is not applicable to this modification request. e. A reduction of more than 10%of the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space; There is a proposed reduction of 2,850 square feet of landscaping and common useable open space which represents 5%of the previous allotted amount for landscaped and common areas. This is not more than 10%of the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space;therefore this criterion is not applicable to this modification Irequest. f A reduction of specified setback requirements by more than 20%; There are no proposed reductions of specified setback requirements; therefore this criterion is not applicable to this modification request. As in the previously approved plan,the Temple is situated within specified setback requirements of the underlying zone. g. An elimination of project amenities by more than 10%where previously specified provided such as: (1) Recreational facilities; There were no proposed recreational facilities in the previously approved application, therefore this criterion is not applicable. (2) Screening; or There is an increase in screening as shown on the newly proposed landscaping plan. New screening is now proposed for the western and southern property lines. As there is no elimination of screening in the newly proposed plan,this criterion is not applicable. (3) Landscaping provisions; and As noted above,there is a proposed reduction of 2,850 square feet of landscaping and common useable open space which represents 5%of the previous allotted amount for landscaped and common areas. This is less than 10%of the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space; therefore this criterion is not applicable to this modification request. h. A 10%increase in the approved density; There is no increase in approved density; as noted above,the only increase in floor area is 1 265 square feet in the proposed Temple plan. Therefore this criterion is not applicable to this modification request. 11 Tigard Ashram and Temple 4 Alpha Engineering, Inc. 1. I C. Minor modification of approved or existing conditional use. 1. Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in Subsection B above shall be considered a minor modification. The modification requested is not within the description of a major modification as provided in Subsection B above and therefore it is considered a minor modification. 2. An applicant may request approval of a minor modification by means of a Type I procedure, as regulated by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria in Subsection C3 below. The applicant is requesting that approval of this minor modification be reviewed concurrently through a Type III procedure along with the Planned Development Concept Plan and Planned Development Detailed Plan that is also being submitted. ' 18.330.030 Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval A. Approval standards. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an ' application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The site size is 2.25 acres and sufficient to provide area for the needs of the proposed Ashram and Temple while adhering to applicable setbacks, landscaping,etc.,therefore this criterion is met. The Planning Commission had previously determined this to be true in their approval of CUP 1999-00001 on December 6, 1999. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; The site is relatively flat. There are trees on the site, but the development has been situated in such a way as to preserve the existing trees. The Planning Commission had previously determined this to be true in their approval of CUP 1999-00001 on December 6, 1999. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; All public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary sewers, and water have adequate capacity to serve the site as discussed in Section 18.800. The Planning Commission had previously determined this to be true in their approval of CUP 1999-00001 on December 6, 1999. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter; The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met as directed by the requirements of the C-P zone as listed in the table below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES Tigard Ashram and Temple 5 Alpha Engineering, Inc. 1 I I. CBD Residential ISTANDARD C-N C-C[4] C-G C-P CBD R-40 R-12 Minimum Lot Size 5,000 5,000 None 6,000 None None None -Detached unit sq ft sq ft - sq ft - - - -Boarding, lodging, - - - - - - - rooming house - - - Il Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft None None None Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft 0/20 ft O ft [6] O ft[6] 0/30 ft 20 ft 20 ft I - Side facing street on 20 ft [5] - - [7] 20 ft 20 ft corner& 0/30 ft through lots [1] 0/20 ft 0/20 ft 0/20.ft [7] 10 ft 10 ft I - Side yard [3] 0/20 ft [3] [3] [9] [9] - Side or rear yard abutting [3] 0/30 ft - more - [7] I restrictive zoning district 0/20 ft 0/20 ft 0/20 ft - 20 ft 20 ft -Rear yard [3] 0/20 ft [3] [3] [9] [9] -Distance between front of - [3] - - 0/30 ft 20 ft 20 ft garage & - [7] property line abutting a - public or I private street. Maximum height 35 ft 35 ft 45 ft 45 ft 80 ft 60 ft 60 ft [8] I Maximum Site Coverage 85 % 80% 85 % 85 % 85% 80 % 80 % [2] Minimum Landscape 15 % 20% 15 % 15 % 15% 20% 20 % I Requirement [10] [3] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. I [6] There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement; however, conditions in Chapters 18.745 and 18.795 must be met. I I I I I Tigard Ashram and Temple 6 Alpha Engineering, Inc. . 1 I I 18.330.040 Additional Submission Requirements Included with this application are 1)Existing site conditions; 2)A site plan; 3)A grading plan; 4)A landscape plan; 5)Architectural elevations of all structures; and 6)A copy of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants. B. Additional development standards. The additional dimensional requirements and approval standards for conditional use are as follows: In accordance with the additional development standards that are required for Religious Institutions: The minimum lot size shall be 20,000 square feet; the front yard setback is at a minimum 25 feet, the side yard setbacks are a minimum of 20 feet; and the rear yard setback is a minimum of 20 feet. Additionally,the requirement for increasing each setback five feet for every 10 feet of building height over 45 feet is not applicable because the only portions of the proposed Temple that are over 45 feet are projections not used for human habitation, namely, domes and spires, designed as architectural ornamentation and according to 18.730.020.A under Exceptions to Building Height Limitations: 1. A. Projections not used for human habitation. Projections such as chimneys, spires, domes, elevator shaft housings, towers excluding TV dish receivers, aerials, flag poles, and other similar objects not used for human occupancy, are not subject to the building height limitations of this title. NARRATIVE ADDRESSING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 18.350.050 Applicability in Commercial and Industrial Zones The applicant is electing to develop the project as a planned development, as allowed in this chapter for a commercial or industrial zone. As allowed by Section 18.350.050 B., the applicant is seeking a planned development approval in a commercial zone, so that they may develop the site to contain all of the uses permitted outright in the underlying zone and, in addition, a maximum of 25% of the total gross floor area may be used for multi- family dwellings in those commercial zones that do not list multi-family dwellings as an outright use. While this is not a typical multi-family use, rather it is a residential dormitory use because each room is not a self-contained unit, in coordination with City Staff, it has been determined that it is appropriate to apply for a planned development approval for this use. 18.350.080 Exceptions to Underlying Development Standards A. Exceptions to parking requirements. There is an opportunity for sharing parking and a legal parking agreement with the owners of the Hall Park Office is included with this application. 18.350.090 Conceptual Development Plan Submission Requirements I Tigard Ashram and Temple 7 Alpha Engineering, Inc. �. A. General submission requirements. The applicant has submitted an application containing all of the general information required for a Type IIIB procedure, along with a statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the planned development. The intended date of commencement of construction is August 30, 2001. The applicant has no intentions of selling or leasing all of portions of the planned development. This narrative and the submitted plans serve as the statement presenting information. B. Additional information. Included with this application are 1)Existing site conditions; 2) A site plan; 3) A grading plan; 4) A landscape plan; and 5) A copy of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants. 18.350.100 Approval Criteria A. Relationship to site development review. The provisions of Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, are not applicable to Planned Development Reviews. The detailed development plan review i,s intended to address the same type of issues as the Site Development Review. B. Specific planned development approval criteria. Density Computation and Limitations. Due to the nature of this development(the temple as a religious institution and the Ashram as an associated dormitory), density computations are not applicable. The following chapters are addressed in further on in this narrative: 18.730, 18.795, 18.745, 18.765, 18.705. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: The buildings have been located on the site to preserve existing trees. There is not significant topography or drainage that will be affected as a result of this proposal. There are no known areas of ground slumping or sliding on site. The proposed setbacks will insure that there is adequate light and air circulation. Fire protection has been considered and the location of these buildings will not hamper fire protection. There are no trees proposed to be removed. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: (1) Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, e.g., between single- family and multi family residential, and residential and commercial uses; (2) In addition to the requirements of the buffer matrix (Table 18.745.1), the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy and extent of the buffer required under Chapter 18.745: 1 (a) The purpose of the buffer,for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; (b) The size of the buffer needs in terms of width and height to achieve the purpose; (c) The direction(s)from which buffering is needed; Tigard Ashram and Temple 8 Alpha Engineering, Inc. I (d) The required density of the buffering; and I (e) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. (3) On-site screening from view from adjoining properties of such activities as service areas, storage areas, parking lots and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: There are no areas containing activities such as service, storage, parking or mechanical devices proposed with this project and therefore item 3 does not apply. c. Privacy and noise: The only non-residential structure proposed is the Temple which will be used primarily in the evenings and on the weekends. Twelve to fourteen foot tall trees are being planted as a buffer from the adjoining uses on the western and southern property lines. d. Private outdoor area--multi-family use: While this is not truly multi-family, all but 2 of the rooms have a deck, the other 2 have access to a deck via a shared room. 1 e. Shared outdoor recreation areas--multi-family use: While this is not truly multi-family because each room is not a self-contained unit, there are shared worship areas,yoga classrooms and open space. f. Access and circulation: (1) The number of allowed access points for a development shall be provided in Chapter 1 18.705; (2) All circulation patterns within a development must be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles; and (3) Provisions shall be made for pedestrian and bicycle ways if such facilities are shown on an adopted plan. g. Landscaping and open space: g en ace:P P (1) Residential Development: Well over 20%of the areas of residential and religious institution development are landscaped. h. Public transit: The access drive fronts SW Hall Blvd., which is on a transit route, however, because the entire frontage is taken up by the access drive,this standard cannot be applied. I Tigard Ashram and Temple 9 Alpha Engineering, Inc. I j. Parking: All parking areas are laid out in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.765. ' A shared parking agreement with the owners of the Hall Park Office Building to the north is included with this application. Currently this includes 96 existing shared parking spaces to be used by the Ashram and Temple during evening and weekend hours, which are hours not in use by the Office Building. This application proposes two (2) additional handicapped parking spaces near the entrance of the Temple. k. Drainage: Drainage is handled by the water quality facility shown on the south side of the site. 1. Floodplain dedication: The proposed site is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore this standard does not apply. Chapter 18.390 DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES 18.390.020 Description of Decision-Making Procedures A. Types defined. There are two types of procedures(Type H and Type III) included with this application, however, as they are concurrent applications,the applicant requests that they be heard together at the higher procedure level, which is Type III. I Type III Procedure. Type III procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that predominantly contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III actions are decided by either the Hearings Office(Type III-HO)or the Planning Commission(Type III-PC), with appeals to or review by the City Council; Type IIIB (18.390.050) Planned Development - Without Subdivision 18.350.100 18.390.050 Type III Procedure A. Preapplication conference. A preapplication conference has been held for the application and pre- application notes have been submitted with this application. 1 B. Application requirements. This application is accompanied with a completed application form, a narrative addressing the relevant criteria,the required fee,two sets of pre-stamped envelopes, and an impact study. Tigard Ashram and Temple 10 Alpha Engineering, Inc. I 1 Chapter 18.520 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 18.520.020 List of Zoning Districts D. C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services,restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. Within the Tigard Triangle and Bull Mountain Road District,residential uses at a minimum density of 32 units/net acre, i.e., equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted in conjunction with a commercial development. Heliports,medical centers, religious institutions and utilities are permitted conditionally. Developments in the C-P zoning district are intended to serve as a buffer between residential areas and more-intensive commercial and industrial areas. 1 18.520.030 Uses A. Types of uses. For the purposes of this chapter, there are four kinds of use: 3. A conditional use (C) is a use the approval of which is at the discretion of the Hearings Officer. The approval process and criteria are set forth in Chapters 18.310 and 18.320. If a use is not listed as a conditional use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.230; According to Table 18.520.1, Religious Institutions are a Conditional Use in the C-P zone. Additionally a single-family unit is permitted, providing that it is located on the same site with a permitted or conditional use and is occupied exclusively by a caretaker or superintendent of the permitted or conditional use. Multi-family housing is permitted as part of a PD, subject to Chapter 18.350. This application requests the approval of a PD in order to allow a multi-family type use. 18.520.040 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapters 18.310 and 18.320; 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. B. Development standards. Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: The Planning Commission had previously determined this application to be in compliance in their approval of CUP 1999-00001 and PDR 1999-00002 on December 6, 1999. I I Tigard Ashram and Temple 11 Alpha Engineering, Inc. I Chapter 18.705 ACCESS,EGRESS,AND CIRCULATION 18.705.030 General Provisions B. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has an approved access plan done jointly with the developer of the adjacent office buildings. C. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title,provided: 1. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and 2. Copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. A copy of the shared parking and access agreement has been included with this application. D. Public street access.All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The access/egress for this site and adjacent office development connects directly with SW Hall Boulevard. ' E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N. The curb cut and driveway is already in place and was approved as a part of the adjoining office construction. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; 2. Within all attached housing(except two-family dwellings) and multi family developments, each 1 residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; I Tigard Ashram and Temple 12 Alpha Engineering, Inc. I 3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping,pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are 1 provided in addition to required pathways. Walkways in compliance with these standards are illustrated on the attached site plans. Chapter 18.725 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 18.725.030 Performance Standards A. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation,the visions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. B. Visible emissions. There will be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other P oint- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water(steam)which is visible from a property line. This development will adhere to the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)rules for visible emissions(340-21-015 and 340-28-070). I C. Vibration. As this is a proposal for a Temple and Ashram,there will be no vibration that is discernible at the property lines without the use of equipment. D. Odors. As this is a proposal for a Temple and Ashram, there will be no odors that is discernible beyond the property. This development will adhere to DEQ rules for odors(340-028-090). E. Glare and heat. There will be no direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding,which is visible at the lot line. Any highly visible lighting from the Temple building or Ashram building will be screened from adjoining properties by landscaping features as shown on the landscape plan. F. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes will be stored in approved facilities and all grounds will be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. 1 I Tigard Ashram and Temple 13 Alpha Engineering, Inc. I 1 Chapter 18.730 EXCEPTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 18.730.020 Exceptions to Building Height Limitations A. Projections not used for human habitation. The human habitation of this development is well within the allowable height limitations of the base zone at 21.5 feet above curb. Projections such as spires and domes not used for human occupancy rise approximately 31.5 feet above the human habitation height but are not subject to the building height limitations of this title. 18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements A. Additional setback from specified roadways. To ensure improved light,air,and sight distance and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, structures in any zoning district which abut certain arterial and collector streets shall be set back a minimum distance from the centerline of the street. Where the street is not improved,the measurement shall be made at right angles from the centerline or general extension of the street right-of-way: 1. Arterial Streets. The required setback distance for buildings on arterial streets is the setback distance required by the zoning district plus the following distances measured from the centerline of the street as contained in Table 18.730.1. TABLE 18.730.1 ADDITIONAL CENTERLINE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Street Names Requirement Arterial Streets: SW Hall Boulevard 45 feet Buildings on this site are setback well over 300 feet from the SW Hall Boulevard right-of-way. B. Distance between multi family residential structure and other structures on site. 1. To provide privacy, light, air, and access to the multiple and attached residential dwellings within a development, the following separations shall apply: There is a courtyard to maintain separation between the northern wall of the proposed Ashram and the southern wall of the Temple. As such,the applicable standard is that of B.1.c listed below(10- foot separation). c. Buildings with opposing blank walls shall have a 10-foot separation; e. Buildings with courtyards to maintain separation of opposing walls as listed in Subsections 1- c above for walls in separate buildings. 2. Where buildings exceed a horizontal dimension of 60 feet or exceed 30 feet in height, the minimum wall separation shall be one foot for each 15 feet of building length over 50 feet and two feet for each 10 feet of building height over 30 feet. Tigard Ashram and Temple 14 Alpha Engineering, Inc. 1 1 One of the buildings is approximately 115 feet in horizontal dimension and 21.5 feet in height. The area in which the walls oppose each other is only about 10-feet because the two buildings are staggered in their placement. However, in calculating the additional required separation as one foot for each 15 feet of building length, an additional 4.33 feet(or a total of 14.33 feet)of separation would be required between the multi-family residential Ashram and the Temple. As shown on the plan,there is approximately 35 feet of mostly courtyard separating the two buildings. 3. Driveways,parking lots, and common or public walkways shall maintain the following separation for dwelling units within eight feet of the ground level: a. Driveways and parking lots shall be separated from windowed walls by at least eight feet; walkways running parallel to the face of the structures shall be separated by at least five feet; and b. Driveways and parking lots shall be separated from living room windows by at least 10 feet; walkways running parallel to the face of the structure shall be separated by at least seven I feet. The proposed development is in compliance with these standards. 18.730.050 Miscellaneous Requirements and Exceptions D. Projections into required yards. 1. There are no projections of cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, canopies or similar architectural 1 features into a required yard of more than 36 inches and none of the width of the required yard is reduced to less than three feet. 4. All unroofed landings and stairs project into required front or rear yards only. 18.745.020 Applicability B. Site plan requirements. A detailed landscape plan is submitted along with this application. 18.745.030 General Provisions A. Obligation to maintain. The applicant,his agent, or appropriate maintenance professionals in order to maintain cleanliness and order and also to prevent interference of maintenance or repair of any public utility; pedestrian or vehicular access or a traffic hazard because of reduced visibility, will maintain maintenance of all landscaping and plant growth in landscaped areas. I Tigard Ashram and Temple 15 Alpha Engineering, Inc. 1 C. Installation requirements. Installation of all landscaping will be installed according to accepted planting procedures; the plant materials shall be of high grade,and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock(ANSI Z60, 1-1986,and any future revisions); and will be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. E. Protection of existing vegetation. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: No trees on the site will be removed by this development. Existing trees which are in danger of damage due to construction will be protected with construction fencing as shown on the site plan. ' F. Care of landscaping along public rights-of-way. Appropriate methods for the care and maintenance of street trees and landscaping materials shall be provided by the owner of the property abutting the rights-of-way unless otherwise required for emergency conditions and the safety of the general 1 public. 18.745.040 Street Trees C. Size and spacing of street trees. ' The property has no street frontage other than the access drive,therefore,this standard can not be applied. 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening 1 B. Buffering and screening requirements. The property to the west is zoned and developed with existing single-family residential homes. The applicant proposes to provide for a buffer based on the matrix in Table 18.745.1 and Table 18.745.2. This would indicate that C. Setbacks for fences or walls. I. No fence or wall shall be constructed which exceeds the standards in Section 18.745.040 C2 except when the approval authority, as a condition of approval, allows that a fence or wall be constructed to a height greater than otherwise permitted to mitigate against potential adverse effects; 2. Fences or walls: a. May not exceed three feet in height in a required front yard along local streets or eight feet in all other locations and, in all other cases, shall meet vision clearance area requirements in Chapter 18.795; 3. All fences or walls shall meet vision clearance area requirements in Chapter 18.795; I Tigard Ashram and Temple 16 Alpha Engineering, Inc. I D. Height restrictions. 1. The prescribed heights of required fences, walls or landscaping shall be measured from the actual adjoining level of finished grade, except that where parking, loading, storage or similar areas are located above finished grade, the height offences, walls or landscaping required to screen such areas or space shall be measured from the level of such improvements; 2. An earthen berm and fence or wall combination shall not exceed the six-foot height limitation for screening. E. Screening: special provisions. 1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. However, the majority 1 of the parking(all but 2 handicapped spaces) is already existing. The proposed parking spaces will have the required screening. Therefore the landscaping and screening standards have been fully met. 1 2. Screening of refuse and service facilities. 1 All disposal areas and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners or refuse collection area which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area will be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials will be contained within the screened area. F. Buffer Matrix. 1.As mentioned above,the Buffer Matrices contained in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 will be used in calculating widths of buffering/screening and required improvements to be installed between proposed uses and abutting uses or zoning districts. According to these matrices,the required buffer for the western and southern lot lines is: 2. Options Width Trees Shrubs or Screening (feet) (per linear feet of Groundcover Ibuffer) C 2 8 15' min/30' max Shrubs 5' fence spacing 18.745.060 Re-vegetation A. When re-vegetation is required. Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping requirements and that are not to be occupied by structures, such areas are to be replanted as set forth in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are completed. The site will either be occupied by structures,paving or landscaping. There are no areas where natural vegetation will be removed. Tigard Ashram and Temple 17 Alpha Engineering, Inc. i I Chapter 18.755 MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLE STORAGE The applicant will comply with the applicable provisions of this section. Chapter 18.790 TREE REMOVAL 1 Not Applicable Chapter 18.795 VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS The proposed landscaping does not impact vision clearance on this site. The site's access at SW Hall Boulevard will maintain the existing visions clearance triangles currently in place. ' 18.795.040 Computations A. Arterial streets. On all designated arterial streets the visual clearance area shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. There is no landscaping or other structures that impede vision clearance at the site's access point along SW Hall Boulevard. 1 Chapter 18.810 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS There are no streets associated with this request. The driveway serving the proposal has already been constructed during development of the adjoining office building. The existing entrance from Hall Boulevard was widened to the 40 feet requested by the City and is noted on the site plan with Keynote (1). The applicant has also submitted an Impact Statement that describes how the site will be served for sanitary sewer,water, and stormwater. 18.810.050 Easements A. Easements. Easements for sewers, drainage, water mains, electric lines or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a development traversed by a watercourse, or drainageway, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of- way conforming substantially with the lines of the watercourse. B. Utility easements. A property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements with the City, the applicable district and each utility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the development. The City's standard width for public Tigard Ashram and Temple 18 Alpha Engineering, Inc. main line utility easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district, or City Engineer. The applicant's Site Utility Plan demonstrates where necessary easements have been provided. 1 18.810.070 Sidewalks There is an existing sidewalk along the frontage of SW Hall Blvd. Adjacent to this site. No further 1 sidewalk improvements are necessary. 18.810.080 Public Use Areas 1 While this is not truly multi-family because each room is not a self-contained unit,there are shared worship areas,yoga classrooms and open space. 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers Sanitary sewer and water service will be provided to the site via extensions connecting to existing lines in SW Hall Boulevard. 18.810.100 Storm Drainage The Hall Park Office development lies uphill of this site. The majority of the storm water from that development was directed to the north toward Highway 217 ROW. The drainage plan for this site should be able to accommodate any sheet flow that reaches this site from the wooded area north of the proposed building. The proposed plan indicates that there will be a vegetated swale constructed adjacent to the southern boundary of the site that will serve as a detention facility and combined with surface water treatment. The plan also indicates that the storm water from this site will be directed to an existing storm drainage line that is located on the adjacent parcels to the east of this site. This existing private storm drainage line is located within an easement granted in favor of the site, as well as the Hall Park Office and ' Kindercare sites. No public storm drainage work is necessary to support this development. Included with this application are storm water calculations and a downstream analysis. ' SUMMARY The proposed Development complies with all applicable elements of the Comprehensive Plan, and Development Code. The proper steps have been taken to ensure compatibility with the established neighborhood character within the City boundaries. Adequate public facilities and services exist to serve the development and all improvements will be constructed to City and other applicable standards. 1 I I Tigard Ashram and Temple 19 Alpha Engineering, Inc. E1 z W W E ■ d H ck E4 U 4t a ICI OM — OM MN OM GNI w all r OW all w MI S NO OM e OD OM i IMPACT STATEMENT For Tigard Ashram and Temple Purpose The purpose of the Impact Study is to review existing public facilities and address any proposed modifications to these that will help mitigate the proportionate project impacts that will likely occur as a result of development. All necessary facilities for serving this site are currently in place on site or in SW Hall Boulevard and can be constructed on site. The transportation system, storm water, sanitary,water and other private utilities are all available and adequate in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Transportation System ' SW Hall Boulevard is classified as a minor arterial on the Metzger/Progress Community Plan. The existing driveway and access serving the Hall Business Park will also serve the ' temple/ashram site. Tri-Met bus route 76 currently serves SW Hall Boulevard adjacent to the site. We expect no adverse impacts to the current capacity of SW Hall Boulevard. A transportation impact analysis was prepared by Howard Stein, P.E.,that demonstrates the proposed temple/ashram will not have a negative impact to the transportation system. A copy of the report is included with this application. Drainage Systems The proposed drainage system will be collected via a piped system and be treated by a water quality swale. A stormwater analysis was prepared for the temple site, Hall Business Park, and ' Gerig property by VLMK Consulting Engineers and is included with this application. The designs will be in accordance with the standards set up by Unified Sewerage Agency. Water Systems Existing water lines for fire protection,domestic use and irrigation are already in place on site and served by the existing water line in SW Hall Boulevard. Sanitary Sewer System Sanitary sewer service is available in SW Hall Boulevard. The applicant is proposing to use the existing system in Hall Boulevard to serve this site. A 6"gravity line will be extended from the line in SW Hall Boulevard to the site where it splits into two 3-inch pressure lines. One pressure ' line serves the existing office building(Hall Business Park),the other will serve the Temple/Ashram site. I I 1 I:\500-387\WORDUmpact Statement.doc i 1 Noise Impacts No negative noise impacts will result from this project. Temples, by nature, are a peaceful environment. The ashram will provide residential units and would not be expected to generate 1 any more noise than a typical residential use. Parks System The site itself provides ample open space. As this is not a typical residential use such as a single family subdivision or multifamily apartment site,the impacts to parks is negligible. 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 I:\500-387\WORD\Impact Statement.doc 1 ' TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS i i 1 - H. S. Stein, P.E. 13340 SW Hanson Road Transportation Engineer Beaverton, Oregon 97008 Phone/Fax(503)641-1437 1 February 13, 1996 Project No.: 223, Hall Park Office Center/ Brahma Premananda Ashram ' Ms. Laurie Nicholson Development Review Planner ' ODOT 123 NW Flanders Street Portland, OR 97209 SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Analysis for the Proposed Hall Park Office Center and Brahma Premananda Ashram Located North of Highway 99 W along SW Hall Boulevard in Tigard, OR. Dear Ms. Nicholson: As re ou requested, a traffic impact analysis has been conducted for the build out of the proposed Hall Y q Park Office Center(approx. 22,466 GSF) and Brahma Premananda Ashram/Temple which is located along SW Hall Blvd. north of its intersection with Highway 99W (See Figures 1A and 1B attached.) As shown in this study, the traffic generated by the office center and ashram can be accommodated by the existing and proposed roadway network without adversely impacting traffic operations or safety. Specific findings of this analysis are as follows: •When the entire site is developed, it is estimated that approximately 475 new vehicle trips will be generated on the roadway system during a typical weekday including 62 vehicle trips during the A.M. peak hour and 64 vehicle trips during the P.M. peak hour. •Analysis of future background traffic volumes that will exist regardless of the proposed development found that access intersections will operate at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS E or better). •Analysis of future traffic conditions with the build out of Hall Park Office Center/Brahma Premananda Temple found that the traffic generated by these developments will not adversely impact future Levels of Service. The following paragraphs document the details of the analysis, study results, and major findings. As was discussed with Marty Jensvold and detailed in my letter of December 11, 1995 the scope of this traffic study will be limited to the intersection of the site access roadway and Hall Blvd. I I 1 I 1 : Hall Park Office Center February 13, 1996 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Transportation Facilities Figure 2 shows the approximate location of the Hall Park Office Center and Brahma Premananda ' Temple, and the surrounding roadway network including the lane configurations in the study area. The major roadway in the immediate vicinity of the site is SW Hall Boulevard which is classified as a minor arterial roadway. This roadway is a two-way two lane highway and approximately 47 feet ' wide throughout the study section. The posted speed limit in the immediate vicinity of the site's frontage is 40 mph along SW Hall Boulevard. Access to the site will be via an existing paved easement roadway on the west side of Hall Boulevard. This roadway is 30 feet wide and tapers to the west to only 24 feet wide. There is a separate left turn lane northbound on SW Hall Boulevard at the site access roadway. This lane is approximately 90 feet long which is sufficient to store 4 vehicles. Finally, Highway 99W, a major arterial highway, is located south on SW Hall Boulevard. Analyses of future traffic conditions were based on the existing roadway system and roadway/intersection lane configurations except as noted. ' Land Uses The site currently contains primarily vacant land with a single family home. Most of the land immediately to the north of the site has residential uses. A Kinder-Care day care facility is located on the south side of the easement roadway. On the east side of SW Hall Blvd is an apartment complex. To south of this area is a dental office building and the Tigard Plaza shopping center. Pedestrian and Bicycling Considerations Throughout the study area, SW Hall Blvd. has sidewalks/paved walking areas on both sides. However, there are no marked bicycle lanes. The easement roadway does not contain sidewalks nor bikeways. ' Transit Considerations Tri-Met operates three bus routes to Tigard, number 12, 64X and 95X routes. There are no bus stops in the immediate vicinity of the site. The nearest bus stop is to the south of the site at the ' intersection of Hwy.. 99W/SW Hall Blvd. Although transit is likely to, play an increasing role in meeting transportation system needs in the future, no specific reductions were made to trips generated by the office center uses discussed in the study. Existing Traffic Volumes A reconnaissance of the site and its vicinity was conducted. To assess the impact of build out of the developments, traffic operations were analyzed during both A.M. and P.M. peak hours because these periods represent reasonable "worst case" traffic scenarios that would be affected by the proposed land use. ' Traffic Volumes Figure 3 shows recent A.M. and P.M. peak hour volumes obtained at the SW Hall Blvd./Site Access during the first two weeks of December 1995. Traffic volumes greater than 25 were rounded upward to the nearest five vehicles. These data revealed that the morning peak hour typically occurs between 7:45-8:45 A.M. and the afternoon peak hour typically occurs between 4:45-5:45 P.M. 1 I Hall Park Office Center I February 13, 1996 Page 3 Peak Hour Traffic Operations ITraffic conditions at the key intersection in the study area were analyzed during the peak hours. Intersection operational analyses were conducted using the procedures in the 1994 Highway I Capacity Manual (HCM) for evaluating minor street stop controlled intersections. This procedure describes traffic operations at an intersection in terms of its Level of Service (LOS). For unsignalized intersections with minor street stop control, the LOS reflects the operation of the most I critical traffic movement/approach for the intersection and is stated in terms of vehicle delay of the most critical intersection movement which is typically a left turn maneuver from the minor street approach onto the major street. The Level of Service (LOS) criteria is stated as a letter grade which I ranges from "A", which indicates little, if any, driver delays, to "F", which indicates that drivers experience long delays. LOS E is the minimum acceptable LOS at unsignalized intersections. I Table 1 shows the calculated LOS from the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) for the Site Access/SW Hall Blvd. intersection based on peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure 3. In addition, traffic operations at this intersection were videotaped during the A.M. and P.M. peak I periods and the actual vehicle delays were measured. These results are also presented in Table 1. Comparing the two sets of delays reveals that they are in general agreement during the AM peak hour, but the actual measured delays during the P.M. peak hour were greater that the values I estimated by the HCS model. This discrepancy results from the fact that a few times during the PM peak hour traffic backs up along SW Hall Boulevard from the traffic signal at Hwy. 99W and blocks this access road. This backup lasts for a short while, typical a minute or less. At the same time, it I should be noted that almost all the vehicles turning out of this during the 4-5 PM hour had delays less than 10 seconds (which equates to LOS B). Intersection capacity analysis for future conditions during the PM peak hour will be adjusted based on the results shown in Table 1. Specifically, the I HCS results for left turns will be multiplied by 1.52 (25/16.4) and the right turns will be multiplied by 2.53 (12.4/4.9)to adjust for actual operating conditions along SW Hall Boulevard. However, results of the HCS model for traffic conditions during the AM peak hour will not be adjusted because the data-in Table-1 indicate the model is already conservative in that it overestimates actual vehicle I delays. ITable 1: 1996 Current Levels of Service Intersection Minor Street Stop Control IA.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Average Level of Average Level of I Vehicle Delay Service Vehicle Delay Service (SecNeh) (SecNeh) Site Access/SW Hall Blvd. I HCS Model Estimate [Measured Delays] EB Left 10.1[8.9] C[B] 16.4[25.0] C[D] I EB Right 4.2[3.3] A[A] 4.9[12.4] B[C] Avg. Of All Vehicles 6.9[5.2] B[B] 9.3[17.1] B[C] I I Hall Park Office Center February 13, 1996 Page 4 Traffic Safety ' Discussions were held with the City of Tigard and accident data was obtained. These discussions and data indicated that traffic safety along the section of SW Hall Blvd. in the immediate vicinity of the site was not a concern. There were no reported accidents at the access roadway. (However, the intersection of SW Hall Blvd and Hwy. 99W is considered a high accident location.) The section of S. W. Hall Boulevard fronting the site is relatively flat and straight, and provides unrestricted sight distance. Thus, there does not appear to be any traffic safety concerns in the immediate vicinity of the site that the developers of the proposed developments must address. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The impact of traffic associated by the build out of the Hall Park Office Center and Brahma ' Premananda Ashram on the surrounding street system during the critical weekday peak hours was analyzed as follows: • Based on the projected year of the completion (1997) and full occupancy of Hall Park Office Center and the Brahma Premananda Ashram, existing traffic volumes were adjusted to estimate background future traffic volumes that will occur regardless of the proposed project. Traffic volumes from other approved developments were included in these estimates. • Total daily and peak hour vehicle trips generated by the development were estimated for Hall Park Office Center and the Brahma Premananda Ashram. ' • Existing traffic volumes to/from the study area were evaluated to estimate the trip distribution patterns in the study area for vehicle trips generated by the proposed uses. ' • Future Levels of Service (LOS) at key intersections in the study area were calculated Futur ( ) y y ' for both the future background and build out traffic volumes. Background Traffic Volumes ' The build out of the Hall Park Office Center and its full occupancy is expected to occur by the end of 1997. The same is true for the Brahma Premananda Temple. To assess the likely future traffic conditions regardless of the proposed development plans, increases in traffic due to general growth ' were applied to existing traffic counts. An 8 percent growth factor was applied to existing through traffic volumes along SW Hall Blvd. Thus, existing traffic volumes were multiplied by 1.08 and again rounded upwards to the nearest 5 vehicles if the value was 25 or greater. Based on this assumption, ' Figure 4 shows the estimated future background traffic volumes. Table 2 shows the results of intersection capacity analysis for these future background traffic volumes. (Next page) Comparing these results with existing traffic conditions reveals that vehicle delays should increase about 10 percent which directly reflects the increases in background traffic volumes. I . . . Hall Park Office Center I February 13, 1996 Page 5 Table 2: 1997 Future Background Levels of Service IIntersection Minor Street Stop Control A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour* IAverage Level of Average Level of Vehicle Delay Service Vehicle Delay Service I (SecNeh) (SecNeh) Site Access/SW Hall Blvd. EB Left 11.1 C 28.4 D I EB Right 4.4 A 13.2 B Avg. Of All Vehicles 7.4 B 18.2 C *HCS Model estimates for the PM peak hour were adjusted based on actual observed delays. See Idiscussion on Page 3. Site-Generated Traffic Volumes IAs shown in Figures 1A and 1 B, the Hall Park Office Center (proposed to be 22,466 GSF) and the Brahma Premananda Temple are located west of SW Hall Blvd,just south of Route 217. Both of these sites are zoned for commercial uses and the proposed developments are allowable land uses. The Iaccess to these developments will be via the existing roadway just north of the Kinder-Care business. Access to the Hall Park Office Center will actually be through an extension of this roadway I to the north through the site for the Brahma Premananda Temple. There will be a shared parking agreement between the two developments. The number of vehicle trips into and out of Hall Park Office Center were estimated using the trip Irates for general office building presented in the 5th Edition of the Trip Generation Report(Land Use Code 710) published by the ITE. These trip rates are based on empirical observations performed at many'similar sized developments located throughout the United States. Table 3 shows Ithe estimated vehicle trips that would be generated by Hall Park Office C:enterlt;is=estimated that the office center will generate approximately 450 vehicle trips throughout a typicail ; kday, including 60 vehicle trips during the A.M. peak hour and 65 vehicle trips during the l':M., 4ak hour. Table 3: Estimates of Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Developments I Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Trips Land Use Total In Out Total In Out IHall Park Office Center ` (22,466 GSF) 450 59 53 6 61 10 51 I Brahma Premananda Temple 25 3 2 1 3 1 2 (2-3 Employees) or less ITotal 425 62 _ 55 7 64 11 53 I I - I . Hall Park Office Center February 13, 1996 Page 6 In addition, the trip generation potential of the Brahma Premananda Temple was estimated. During a typical weekday, there will be few vehicle trips generated by the Temple, except on a few days of the year that are Holy Days. Discussion with the religious leaders revealed that they traditionally have services on Sundays from 11 AM to 1 PM and have 10-30 families attending. Their current membership is 75 families and on major Holy Days (2-3 days during the year) as many as 250 people may attend worship services. The proposed Temple will contain 4,000 GSF with a capacity of approximately 350 people. On a daily basis, there will be at most 2-3 employees at the Temple with a few visitors throughout the day. Based on this information, Table 3 shows the estimated trip generation for the proposed Brahma Premananda Temple. tDirectional Distribution and Assignment of Site-Generated Trips Vehicle trips associated with the proposed developments should follow the existing pattern of traffic along SW Hall Blvd and the existing Kinder-Care business. The volumes indicate that the majority of the traffic heads to the south. Based on this pattern, the directional distribution for vehicle trips generated by the proposed developments and the assignment of these trips onto the roadway network are shown in Figure 5 . Total Future Volumes and Traffic Operations ' The impact of the build out of the Hall Park Office Center and the Brahma Premananda Temple was assessed by adding the traffic volumes shown in Figure 5 to the future background traffic volumes shown in Figure 4. The resulting total future build out traffic volumes are shown in Figure 6. Again, intersection capacity analysis were performed. As shown below in Table 4, the LOS results at the key intersection increase about 10 percent compared to the background traffic results. The only exception was the left turn maneuver from the access roadway increased about 20 percent and the level of delays are estimated to be LOS E. However, it should be kept in mind that it is projected that there will be only 32 vehicles making this left turn maneuver during the critical PM.peak hour. In addition, it should be noted that most of the traffic leaving the site should be closer to 5 PM when traffic along SW Hall Blvd is relative less and does not back up. Vehicle queues eastbound on the ' access road will be several vehicles long during the peak time when the majority of the offices close, but throughout the majority of the day should only be 1-2 vehicles long. The driveway to the Kinder ' Care business is approximately 70 feet (to the center) back from SW Hall Blvd. This distance is sufficient to store approximately 3 average size passenger vehicles. Thus, the driveway to the Kinder Care business should remain clear of vehicle throughout most of the day. An improvement ' that would help vehicle queuing would be to stripe the access roadway for three lanes (each 10 feet wide)which would allow for one inbound lane and two outbound lanes (separate right and left turn lane). As there is little truck traffic on this access street, particularly during the PM peak hour, implementing narrow lanes should not be a problem. Based on these results and the existing left turn lane, no additional roadway improvements are necessary to accommodate the any traffic generated by the proposed Hall Park Office Center and the Brahma Premananda Temple. I 1 . Hall Park Office Center February 13, 1996 Page 7 Table 4: 1997 Future Levels of Service with Proposed Developments ' Intersection Minor Street Stop Control A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour* Average Vehicle Level of Average Vehicle Level of Delay (SecNeh) Service Delay (SecNeh) Service ' Site Access/SW Hall Blvd. EB Left 12.5 C 33.6 E EB Right 4.5 A 13.9 C Avg of All Vehicles 8.0 B 20.9 CID * HCS Model estimates were adjusted based on actual observed delays. See Page 3. Site Access and Internal Roadways As noted previously, the primary access to the proposed two development will be provided via an extension of an existing access street on the west side of SW Hall Blvd. This street current provides access to a Kinder Care child care business and a few single family homes. It is currently 30 feet wide at its intersection with SW Hall Blvd but narrows to 24 feet west of the driveway to the Kinder Care driveway. It is proposed that this roadway be extended west to access the site for the Brahma tPremananda Temple and then to the north to provide access to the Hall Park Office Center. The roadway with is proposed to be 24 feet wide and it will have curbs and sidewalks. The applicants are proposing 102 parking spaces for the Brahma Premananda Temple site and 74 spaces are tproposed for the Hall Park Office Center. In addition, the two sites will have a shared parking agreement to utilized each others parking area. Parking for bicycles will also be provided. Access to the adjacent parcel to the east will be provided. Finally, the parking lot of the Hall Park Office Center is designed to have a turn around area for trucks and cares as well as a hammerhead turning pattern on the west side of the site for fire trucks. Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the results of the analysis described in this letter report, the Hall Park Office Center should have little impact on future peak hour traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site. The major ' intersections in the study area will continue to operate at the acceptable Levels of Service, LOS E or better, when this development is built out. No specific off-site roadway improvements are recommended to accommodate this development or mitigate its impact. If there are any questions ' related to the information or analyses discussed in this report, please contact me directly. Sincerely, Howard S. Stein, P.E. Transportation Engineer cc: Applicant Attachments PROj232.RPT Figure 1A: Proposed Site Plan for Hall Park Office Center I I I e I I I I I I Hail Park Office Center/Brahma Premananda Temple/Ashram H.S.Stein,P.E.,Transportation Engineer 1 • Figure 1B: Proposed Site Plan for Brahma Premananda Temple/Ashram I I I I I I I I' I t I I I Hall Park Office Center/Brahma Premananda Temple/Ashram H.S.Stein,P.E.,Transportation Engineer 1 • Figure 2: Study Area and Intersection Lane Configurations I 4 SW Pfaffle 4 Kinder- 63 Care W P aza h 9944 I I I N Traffic Signal Drawing not to scale. Hall Park Office Center/Brahma Premananda Temple/Ashram H.S.Stein,P.E.,Transportation Engineer I • Figure 3: Recent Peak Hour Volumes in the Vicinity of The Project Site ao in %-Col I (13)111 (25)15■ , SW Pfeifle 1 t tO eto �CO Co Kinder- m Care I Tigard cn Plaza • I I I I At Traffic Signal AM(PM)Peak Hour Volumes Drawing not to scale. Hall Park Office Center/Brahma Premananda Temple/Ashram H.S.Stein,P.E.,Transportation Engineer 1 Figure 4: Future Background Weekday Peak Hour Volumes 1 In the Vicinity of the Site I 1 T� e-et i (13)11—it (25)15,, SW Pfaffle l I c to ' v Kinder- CO Care Tigard Cl) Plaza 9944 •• I I I I N Traffic Signal S t AM(PM)Peak Hour Volumes Drawing not to scale. Hall Park Office Center/Brahma Premananda Temple/Ashram HS.Stein,P.E.,Transportation Engineer I Figure 5: Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Associated with Hall Park Office Center and Brahma Premananda Temple II 35% (19)21J (34)5 - SW Pfaffle 4 n ' ti Kinder- Care 65% Tigard y Plaza N`tisi 9'441 I I I I N I Traffic Signal !S+ AM(PM)Peak Hour Volumes Drawing not to scale. IHall Park Office Center/Brahma Premananda Temple/Ashram HS.Stein,P.E., Transportation Engineer I 6: Total Future Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Figure Y Buildout of Hall Park Office Center and Brahma Premananda Temple I 111 cz 010 I 4) 1 1- (32)131 (59)20', I SW Pfaffle 1 1 N 0) 7 M a- II ri In M m till, y . 47„,, Kinder- m Care I = Tigard Ch Plaza N414 9941 •• I 111. I I. I N Traffic Signal 1, AM(PM)Peak Hour Volumes Drawing not to scale. IHall Park Office Center/Brahma Premananda Temple/Ashram H.S.Stein,P.E.,Transportation Engineer I I i t 1 STORM WATER CALCULATIONS LEWIS & LEEn OF 'Ml1VBY= i= consulting engineers 18650 s.w. boones ferry road DATE I O I S, O O JOB NO. Qs/ tualatin.oregon 97062 CJ / (503)885.8605 phone (503)885.1206 fax ATTENTION RE:VAN VLEET 5 itikdi tcorparated, T / .G ' O 63 5-rktJDDi /ads NO riu.aotAy R-o . I 2o o ? I WE ARE SENDING YOU ttached ❑Under separate cover via the following items: ❑Shop drawin•s ❑Prints ❑Plans ❑Samples ❑Specifications ❑Copy of letter ❑Change order al(i6 ( P/41-4-5 COPIES DATE t NO.r CiOiC D,i,w6s seT 5-Fogg C -e_c_s DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: I ' ❑For approval ❑Approved as submitted ❑Resubmit copies for approval " For your use ❑Approved as noted ❑Submit copies for distribution III ❑As requested ❑Returned for corrections ❑Return corrected prints ❑For review and comment ❑ a ❑FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US IP REMARKS I I I I in COPY TO / 140z_ lti / /SIGNED: '� 6 If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at ce. 1 'LEWIS & lir;1 • VAN VLEET Ilncorporated principals chns c.van vleet. p.e. I lewis. p.e. CIVIL CALCULATIONS FOR I TEMPLE / ASHRAM II 11515 SW Hall Boulevard ITigard, Oregon FOR Geo Standards I I + . 14., .. 1'r InG'°,' L ;v T eµ , EXPIRESI 2/31/2000 I Lewis& Van Vleet Inc. Job Number 98122 Iconsulting engineers 18660 s.w. boones ferry road tualatin. oregon 97062 (503) 885.8605 phone I (503) 8E15.1206 fax wis & , 'L_,,:..:„ . consulting engineers S-10b A-- S 18660 s.w. boones ferry road tualatin. oregon 97062 Job No. cZ5VV7- By [503)885.8605 phone [503)885.1206 fax Job-T-61-17i- Client GC-.D /AG-AA-T-40'1 .3 ?-t.cl tSt) irVLEET Date \0 - \IS-0 0 Sheet No. t I orporated .10?"1"A VOMr---;-a- CA LC . • P6,TC• kirr ". Nor ZEZZL4 iZef) ( a- Sru I . • Orrr-e_ 0.tAkt-ITN/ — Teo.nb c- 13/0-S•UltLe F US A STA-4.013 ASZS . 1 . . , . , Itir-s-zvicits A-R.4A= ko,Z-S0 5 F ( . . .: . .1 gUIATE g.-1.1T-Ig.£ 51(,)A-rt'AA-7E-4 'P.-AA/..)0Fr FO a /0 /L 5112p4.1 77/120t/G'1 -Ski ALE 111 . Q = 0 :54 C F 5 10 (5&e 'PP kirov-r- i : ZIO-Swk-LE, CZ-I'm-El A : L--- /00'I1 l&) t1io.)U/u6 s A . 0.7-4o I (%-e. tA ...A rLfrpl.ackttc-) 5. 0..vo50-.1x. ti ,,L) it te St..0?& 4; I V. 2,0 FPS rIA-I Prz-66-3oftlal• = I.0 0,4-) 0= 0.t .7- rt ABC 73c-r/r)/,:A.)., -ri :- z.o e , 1 7--.:* cf :-1,Ai t.7.,r:e r"A) • : I I o .34 c rs ; V= 0.7-0 FP5 > (sce i-z,kfrour 2) : I . 0= o. 45 Fr ZCC;L$A.tr-eb Lr.4,x,.-nk .= v T = (0.1-0-c-Y..5 (ci mitAkic-s (Cpo iiii.) L -.: \OS FT . . I I _ • r? : • CA Lc 4A.L.41 E. *Sc), 7 tk E. Zen o#JA-t... rle--r14-c)72,. Foe_ P 10 `it 5.-traRri I Rfr1kipk,..4._ 1A.,7-c-A.).-_.,77E-s . S krrAr.,,,tez talers,f667: I . •i . . . . . • • . , . . . . . . %O M t Ca I 'fUJTOu'r 1 /I KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH "STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C.S . TYPE-1A I - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM - STORM DATA FILE �PECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 C.S . TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION NTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10, 24, 3 . 45 11******************** S .C.S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 . 45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ItNTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, . 373, 98, 5 IDATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN . 4 . 0 90 . 0 . 4 98 . 0 5. 0 It PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 34 7 . 67 4355 !LATER Ed: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: TEMPLE Q10 11 I t 1 I/ I . TEMPLE/ASHRAM WATER QUALITY SWALE Tel N'totdT Z. Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel i I Project Description Project File c:lwinntl profiles lbryan\desktop100storm.fm2 Worksheet SWALES Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel IMethod Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.240 IChannel Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 4.000000 H :V Right Side Slope 4.000000 H :V I Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 0.34 cfs Results —4' Depth 0.45 ft I Flow Area 1.73 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 5.74 ft Top Width 5.63 ft I Critical Depth 0.09 ft Critical Slope 1.981159 ft/ft •••■ Velocity 0.20 ft/s J Velocity Head 0.6e-3 ft Specific Energy 0.45 ft Froude Number 0.06 IFlow is subcritical. I _ I I ""‘I1Pr 0.45 ft II 2.00ft Vk I H 4.0 NTS t00 FlowMaster v5.15 02:19 AM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 I ION ern .r all no MB "PT `! c rid,PA MO PM a • 1.111 MB ON Oil Project No. 98122 Designed by: BSD Date: 10/18/00 Checked by: KSM Date: Project Name: TEMPLE/ASHRAM Page: 1 of 1 DESIGN SECTION DESIGN CALCULATIONS DESIGN INVERT ELEVATIONS EQUIV. TOTAL to MH INCR. TOTAL INTEN- INCR. RUNOFF INCR. EQUIV. RUNOFF SLOPE DIA. CAPA- MH VELOC. LENGTH UPPER LOWER OR TIME TIME SITY AREA COEFF. AREA AREA CITY ST to ST T Tf I A C CA WA Q S d Qf Vf L minutes minutes in./hr. acres coeff. acres acres cfs % inches cfs fps feet TEMPLE RD- FD 5.0 5.0 2.10 0.054 0.9 0.049 0.049 0.10 9.06% 4 0.83 9.49 127 224.00 212.49 FD-J1 0.2 5.2 2.08 0.001 0.9 0.001 0.050 0.10 0.50% 4 0.19 2.23 72 212.49 212.13 AD1 -AD2 5.0 5.0 2.10 0.057 0.9 0.051 0.051 0.11 0.50% 4 0.19 2.23 55 212.50 212.23 AD2-J1 0.4 5.4 2.05 0.057 0.9 0.051 0.103 0.21 0.50% 4 0.19 2.23 50 212.23 211.98 J1 -J2 0.4 5.8 2.00 - - - 0.152 0.30 0.50% 6 0.57 2.92 62 211.89 211.58 ASHRAM RD-CB 5.0 5.0 2.10 0.063 0.9 0.057 0.057 0.12 3.25% 4 0.50 5.68 80 217.00 214.40 CB-J2 0.2 5.2 2.08 0.070 0.9 0.063 0.120 0.25 3.25% 4 0.50 5.68 84 214.40 211.67 J2 - SWALE 0.4 6.1 1.97 - - - 0.272 0.54 0.50% 6 0.57 2.92 36 211.58 211.40 SWALE - EXIST MH - - - - - - - 0.54 0.80% 6 0.72 3.69 60 210.50 210.02 NOTE: PIPE SIZES ARE CALCULATED USING THE RATIONAL METHOD FOR A 10 YEAR STORM USING ODOT, ZONE 7 RAINFALL INTENSITIES. t i 11 X 17 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 . . • • ,.. ' ' •' - - ., • - . .... • . , . I .. . . . . . . . .• ... 0 0 • CI 3 ..•® -' CI 0 C.) ED Q EV-0"0 6,0 119,4'BLDG.DIMENS N 1,- I ,4.-o- 16'-0- 17-0 15,6 17,0" 15'-6' 12,6" 13-7 17. %2, •I , 48-0 BUILDING oyE Ns. • I/ . 7,. i 4,,,,___.;____._._________ , .4. ,:r : NON-STRUT.ELEMENT •■• N.I.C. trIWuk I' " ' • • ' . . la 0 l' ilk ,.VP_D? IIIIN■31,‘ - < SECTION 1 co a or o La . r _1 Ihthe r toow laritn y On ci . . I . z-, i ,... ,H., .91_,P4H, ;II, IP PP:0.k% .x.,‘ :. . e . 0- . . .. 4'-0' • 13,0-, co ;- < .-r . , • n. ..ri 111., N I.C. • sodthoeTesidisenfoot ,- -e, ,,„/ "KM 111 . . MI co . .c diii. - %HAW, SECTION < °?- • p.m MUM, 1 • iv , ..a. 1 . 1 'HUGH/ ■ / 7-7.. ' tu!!!!!!!!!! IC., •• 0 N.1.C. • i •;,71, Alt , ,A _______.GFRC DOMES ' • I r • 6 . . .. .. . a.--!-' z `f ''? 7( \\ ■,. rIAM, ,:. ,./Ni . ,..... . , 9 ,!--• (Wk.!, -,"-,- • in A MCJ. •1/2!EXP.JOINT' . . c.' • a , , . • • . . 14 "•'" - ...i....,,:47, vs. ,,4111.,, -, ;-. • - rektigalt440.0:11 i, ,if-lh v MCJ • lk 1=. '-. 1:::: \-- V.16 itedteged -12■4 J - ' -4k- cir uiTh, 'Irr GFRC PRE-CAST DECORATIVE - llt.4.1 . 111Milii 111111111 AIM ■ 11 17.'-' 1111111111.11.1.111011 .1 Il EIIIIIMIIIIIIIIII, 111, '1,4"TYP:I °PING , --IrrITAMmoom 1.7--, -- , Z'e- airallEnigal ---- --_ _ f . • , . — milamiraTos Mii 4 . . b ‘1Sr.. ...__ T/ROOF ,__.,,, • ign 0 mgmi ...mt.._ RANELS ANCHORED ---- RICK WALL TYP. EL29'-0" gliNiblill------11W111/PAII■Vii •••=.1,;!, TO B ir0 i'CL:d ' 1 ›- .....■,■....rriIAr.r.r■■■■■■•ii........ ....... '.:,..■ il).......■r.,!.4 .- tores,Xmom_ 1■■■......i61.... ,.-, 7461 irA I.I El I KO IVA r 11,1,NI. . NI■111111111WAVAIMINIMIGFRC C°R 21111111P4IIMMIL . A FA FA I I I•I I■ T e 4 =I A, A I I I I I I I MI I 0 I&I\ GFRC CORNICE . . :_ or.. 4 II MINN Mii•■•■•we MIMENO■■•■■•••■mm.•■■■■■111■IMIIMIN■11111=, •. • .1111■•■il=“.. I ‘,..-•, kerrenw■■•=. ...me :::' •-NraWialr-- 11...iippmr. ,n1,, .'MCJ i-raW:o i liar . re-■ io io ....,..._........ 7=== . 1 I ' IMII AN W WV . ... ---- w I 1/5"RIGID INSUL, ; 1 1 ''-i 1/2'MEJ b • 8-CMU,2'CAVITY . . ° - MIMI .- ill 4-BRICK VENEER ON .- . ,1161: 11E11 lid 50 1 i Witlii II Hal=ol - II-1" ilillEliIIIIIIIIIII,ilmnigialas ,,,, • 4S T/UPPER LEVEL SLAB immiliniumerseimmmelimmEe-...1 I L.,. 1Z1 mr..*_-Wyrt_ - I 1 11•11111=M1•1111111111111•111111111111111111=111111MIMMINI111111 -----R----;ri\-:-- \ \-- ... _ . 4, nenuir wit ___,.................__ .. , _ s--4.,--. IMIIMMNIIIMI NM MI=7. • =MEM•■•■•■•■■■••4......, 12-0 MIIIIIIIaLjj■ Ili% .ri @,i? EL!13,0" =fflg ----" i....-- -immii ---------- I T/ROOF SLA11=11=Oq===El LOAD BEARING WALL ' • ,%'•'-'-//- 1. 4111 ic `. rc=== r. Iv IIIW... _II ..,..1111111 MI IIIIIIIIII VIE) .1411 miam mi l•1ijr ,• 1 - 1.11.111.11MMINIIIIPEIMIHMEMOMI ' ."7" ... ' ,—ikM•.,:•• MIN•111111111•11=1111111111 mi■oit..■,.....„11■1 MEE' -. • ■3, • ' -, • 1,= . - „,..-MIMI . __ .___. --Ea - . ,- — • ,__, EX T#1 .._.. T._1 .9 - ——— 1 7 .- 7? D. 0 1.-8\.__...onnifilm LI Li . I -! . Lai , . i' ENT. 1 ,, 1 , EXIT#2 SECTION • ' • . r- I _ =•------- --- '=-----'--= -- - •"•'" ________- __' _—"."-•-'-___-__—__ ___-._:...7—: LOWER LEVEL 4.-...." 6111.?"... 12 \ - litOWER LV TIILET BOLOC , I 1 7--..; . ''' ,...•''L., ..05T/LOW0T1 LEVEL SLAB ' • - ,1.1..,_ 'N.'s'', 4•13RICK VENEER ON 13"CMU, L.r. 33,0"SUNKEN COURT . r EL 0,0"--4,- sunken court . I 20,0' __I_______10' 1. .___. sunken cour1 J . .- 2"CAVITY,W/1/5"RIGID INSUL. - . ........ — SOUTH ELEVATION • EAST(FRONT) ELEVATION • MGJ=MASONRY CONTROL JOINT LOAD BEARING WALL . . . EXIT #1 . , • SCALE: 118'•• 1,0' . SCALE: 1/8"--r- 1,0 ; ... - - • - --- • -- ENTRANCE • . • e--' .. LOWER LEVEL EL 0.0" =+2171.0.USGS i • , f ' . . . 0 0 0 0 0 .. •0 .. 0 . ._ • o . GFRC=GLASS FIBER REINFORCED-.CONCRETE ,••••' B • 37-0' • (E) ' -;'-,- . 119•4- . . - -------- MCJ=MASONRY CONTROL JOINT - \ . 13,7' 12,6" 8'-2- 15,6" •17,0* 15,6" 17,r• IIMEIMMIN W-0. MEJ•-•MASONRY EXPANSION JOINT o (-1 l _ ' 17,2" • I, . . . • • • - I I___ 48,0'BLDG.DIMENSIO • , • ' • . : , 4,0" . ' . '• . .- ____________. ._________ __... I , . . - oI . • A. 9 ' 4E0 4 MOD, . ._ _ r • - . i'err...w. -----i--- ••••ii•••••x• , . . . 9 - . j • s \ ' ...,, ..4„, • GFRC DOMES FLAT HORZ.SLAB TYP. .1 "tf., ..y.ttp. ,L., _ . . --; 2 ;4k: 'It „..-..3 ••,,.. • i.1 . GFRC DOMES . 3 0- I -- .-"'"--/- ., C; , --- . • • I- [ , -GFRC PRE-CAST DECO ATIVE PANELS .'NCHORED TO BRICK ,ALL TYP. • '(:( All// -11"'!7"-- ,-'1" ,2_,Lorrtrida I NW - cs, ... ii, , • • ' N #. _._ -- , •(vow ------1 p, ,. %. -i•- klillt* Simla. __ It - , 7: ''2' • I :7,‘ a . \ li • AIL. .. • SECTION ;IR il ;/.•• 1 .,-■ 1 di ': r ilk ...... . , ,, . ,•,,,,-/IA 1111* '111A 2' itit.4, , ,. , __ ,,,,,,, MCJ -An- iiiiiji, •-1.-.•-- J ''''''' '•,,,, LII 1 •,07e 't VeZ.eolwAtaxay, _ . .,:: ifT,II%, % 1 .."..''7 Waal%OM .trifelMVirt _. II iiim Ikit/- I IM.=11. AEVL . . r _..____ , MCJ • al-M1 I_ I Wr , A ........ _ _ _25, ai awm. ,iii. .milim-- alm— --mom ill I , ,.., . , . ,,...,., „, , 1 , ._____ _. „mi." ... -1 EXP JOINT munamsommensamonmen '-E1111:Xiii:AFIgnirifliii 'MIMI mt Arrra"■tairiare.".•■:W----=-----1 .,•••■■■■■•■■■••■••=11M■111•1111•MMINENIIIIMI.■ MI MA —- -a 0 taii-mm .TET2.....:. --- ,-----.:,: ''- GFRC CORNICE )••• •-■ .oiia..me:ri.PLIL.tf46 •. Ali se Wiffilininigill rA Fa i m■IffrA vAll 1 1 u ms■■•■ I Kril' ■i i WA a i I m h.. li. , . 17-1; ri --:7.7,: i..w,,_...---_41..„7.77.- ' ■Il IS•••MIN IVI-W- -WI I I W I I I I I•I II 0 EMI VA IMO 2 I I'VA I-F--' Zi 4-13RICK VENEER ON 8"CMU. IIIINIII•11 --4,-M_MilLIIIIL .4111■•‘WW1 40 Aiii 15 F I 4' b - • ' . il Adill10/1)3111111139Wi 111 NI 51i 15ii Ni III BE ME:istlicro•II ^. ■ . • 2”CAVITY W/11/5'RIGID INSUL. --w . LOAD BEARING WALL illiiiiiiiin 1/2'MEJ- IIIII _ ..--\.--------....ItiPalir..._-....,.- ell1111.111 Cil 1-rum ...1111•11111111111MINI I . ,1111111.11111111•11•1••■_.1 T/UPPER LEVEL SLAB • em IIIIMMME1111111161111111=11M 9 ormons••••■■ ..ii".10- - AMteili =mom .'g';' 7? EL 13,0* soireir......■-•■•••••-•mmii.:= -1_ ..._. -1ir ...., . 1101 --- Eve In Eh imummoi. . i :00, .,.........., '171'fii:i:, - No__ 1-m-imo 1 ___ _ -,_..„,. E., _ MOM MIKEIMMI.O.IMINMAE MI MEM MI _ . - , Z? D 0 LO ER LEVEV ' 1 0 . SECTION 0 t!.!'. .... 1 1 1 i SECTION e..) .• WE81flie-Art ECEVIArioN . • -T/LOWER LEVEL SLAB EXIT#3 • - SCALE: I/8 = V-Cr —_. ' 9/2312000 • • I i ■ 11 : SECT 4 I 1 ■1•••••111.11111■C I. _EL 0,..0•_fil — BRAHMA pREMANAND TEMI: 14,-.E .____ I --..- ,..;.7 ' .-i'-' SECTIO 0 43'-6- ' SUNKEN COURT ,. i . . al- . ____ --- -- ----- ---------I I ...I 1- ,--4 • . • . . 11 -.' . -_, - SHEET tiTLE - - TIGARD,OREGON 97223 - EXIT #2 .• - —.-....--,. ARCHITECT . • ELEVATIONS I - . . . . NORTH ELEVATION .SCALE I/r-1,0' ' / . . REV 2/19 2001 MI DATE ISSUED FOR BLDG.PERT s NO REVIS7ONS DES/WI-ION I I SCALE D1 A.07 •ZE DWG Ile/ • ■ .. . It ., 1 '0 C: ' 0 ® ® O 8 ' 9 F E B O O 6'-0"O 8'-0" O 32.0' CB 8'0'Q 6'-0' q•-0. 16•-0• t 7,-0. 15,-6. 13'-7' / / - _. 15'-6' 8'•2" 12'-6• _ (D O • I . ' / 7 5' / 17•-2" 7'57 / 2'-0' 2'-0- • N.I.C.TYP NOTE#1 ' 1 • '° i'• 1'THICK GLASS IBER REINF. ;o `` ‘ CONC.PRE-FAB ICTED IN 6 ,t. SHOP ASSEMeI D,ANCHORED TO l STL.FRAMING t 0 I NON-HABITABLE EAD SPACE SINGLE PLY MEMBRANE ROOFING w • , I /— 12'-0.0 ALUM FRAME STANDARD • •N•3/4''TH.EXT.GRADE PLY WO U o i NON-HABITABLE DEAD SPACE .TYP.@ THREE D ME$ a TYP.@THREE DOMES - ■ ---.- - �� SKYLIGHT, 1•WSUL.'GLAZING • SHEATHING a I 2`0" /I ,' t'-4'HIGH I2 CM COURSES), y I , c I; l (SOLAR BRONZE) o -�. z/1, 3/4'0 STL.DO EL 24'O.C.CURB - E. I N PLAN PROFIT OF DOMESJYP. a f t 2'-0 LVL BEAM,RAFTER FRAMING o a I 1 --FINIALS BEYOND 4'0 t3'-0'_ J w �/ I - SEE NOTE#1 I io I SINGLE PLY MEMB NE o m \ (�,1. I . I ROOFING..ON RIGIDr PERED .^ m m (--7r-4-'N I • iv I I I i INSULATION BD(3".., ) A ,-� ZZ • i I ! �` '4:OFTSLWAB CO- ° �t ••-•- _� • :� �, k _��\�� ,' \-- Z - - • - PRE-FABRIC.GFRC DECORATIVE WIN 1•, ■ ' .* ' PRE FAB CORNICE 2'-4'PROJECTION•RO _ 0 Y•.Y r.,''-•: •..::•..�. Y EL 29 o - -- - --' 4 T ROOF '1 r I' s, ���� IF r• it O I / II' cs 40 i.-.,,..--7-._!..m_mii••••■,,,.ff,.:;:, 7 _, m N ,EXTERIOR WALL CONST.: lo in r io _ S 1/. 5.0 S .PIPE COLUMN.,CLADED k. l ,11' j • •D .4-BRICK VENEER,2'CAVITY•'0 ° I ��� PRAYER HALL gig VEST. II _ w/DE�gR.HARD WOOS _ -I; (,, W/1.5'RIGID INSUL.BOARD•%I SHRINE AREAS I B I EXTERIOR CR i O o PRAYER HALL t" �% BB_ _ I SHRINE# 1 SHRINE 02 ,/'6'CMU BACK UP 1 ��' ' I Illil iiii���l�� it �3 [��\�� I LOAD BEARING WALL- 1HR.F.R. :� ::. . -------- - - - - - — - _ C�iVS�r:�E �� T/UPPER LEVEL _ r s I ''� 1 • &.t: g,` ';iz!j$" .;; 'S;„w1,i �1 rt EL 16'-0' - �1'\ 3"MTL.DECK L • /.........,:.,.;,..,.•..:•'�:....:r:,-:_.;: 'i:+ \ •'/` T WT.CONC.SLAB ix; �! 1 t0 .1.� �' `'.I`^^" S'4 .max_ III :u. ^s, TOTAL 6'TH.SLAB i7 T @1 -H Y:cCl+t;-.❑ '•^,.,1� •BlBEAM SOFFIT• r__ •_— --__. Ali • MULTI •IIeSHALL I ± f it +` - M41LT-PURPOSE HALL KITCHEN• - .... _ _.\ +._�-1_N..-,.t. 4.--,:4 •�iri?:-. ':r:._....,a.`c.�--_•-L\'%•' -.?:. :'•-••,"0 _ . .::7--=';:c:-..,:4&=`: - 'E a��i1.:..� .i' .�:4 i 1N7Y , p. .r -- - ..•1. _•n.�.:d v _1 t_7.:1-j3 '??y>\: r qty?• l/>. ,j...•..7i;%Jr'.:i!G�>'P.f l:...i:•; r�ha ' LONG-SECTION B B SCALE:1/e•=r•o• I 2 CROSS SECTION A A • SCALE: 1/8"--=1,0' • LOWER LEVEL SLAB ON GRADE EL 0'-0"=!21 0'USGS . (-.7 9. 14'-O"COWMN GRID E4S1-WEST." • 11-6' / 71-0' k 11_6. -1:i.--':-.-. �y 1 _ a� Mini g \-.q. y -----��� I �I: C. ER CASING ADJ•E51D `j��!\R C . —N I•ERGIASS._.. -- --- ¶) , ^. ,t __ °o-• . _ r. \��„�Q . 9 • �411GYR BD W/21y'4--� t�•• I Q�°�� �, (� MTL5TllD F1WN1K �_ _ •ze. I• I _ �\ — 1tlJ' FIBER GLA55 �-^1, I .4- F' _ --' TRIM mALDCN•I•G� ,�' • yl!1,.-O .aD C I p!lgy STEEL LATH,i LAP ---�' 1 •.Y 1�. iii 1 aTii.— �a�� n�i�i r iii �► Q' Q 1 7 - . X711-be r ,� JOINTS �� 5 • I i �s Oi�:. - I P i FIBER.SPRAYED •FIBERGLASS �-T— �' � y_sy_ -_ 1' 6 � I I! GYP.CEMENT RASTER BRACKET 45tDF5) r SEE& B Q,Y• r-r*---- a ` �-- I s- TFioWEL E;MODTFI RN141 I• Tr.(N•1•C� �—' ,rte 5 irilC —� III V G �1I + 1 Ga ' j PERFECT OQA60NAL E YP•tATN PLASTER L- " A I-5" � 1'-9" I'-5" ,_4 IPA' c il ATiCM6S 18'DEEP �0 ill Iii` IiIyN,ATdOVB FLOOR I ' I / 0 N I,� 3/8.93 SR BAR 24'04. ,�1 I l GYP.LATH PLASTER 12'I_ , I' 1 oR5/e"GYP ev 5)IRIN-NITCN j vE>P OCTAGONAL SHAFT y'1 Alipl. I i,„ �,,,ICii�u_ 7, , COL/UAW BTEBL �-•;' .�������� ,, Ili RAN FORCOWMN • \7411111111 •ENCASMq•�TYF.) Q '^ T' 4.REINP•. •• i JJ - j - sue-I�, perx w+l�9Gke^ 2. 3'--- I 1/8"..±..4_on + �ld'! t7�f�*e I —�_z,. TYP. 1S•• FIBERGLASS CDLUNJI _� 1NE OF COLUMN BASE Below �- 6A.SE-2MALVES ��, - __ ?J.I.G ,<A1 _ _ I •_ I UL DESIGN N o. X824. UL DESIGN No. X824 r�r 4a>_�I -}� I .. —>— @ PRAYER HALL ONLY:. @ LOWER LEVEL ONLY �- L � _ . FULL FIGHT OF COLUMN ARCH ELEVATION @ COLUMN GRID B&E I ARCH ELEVA ION @ SHRINE #4 & # 6 SIDE ARCH ELEVATION @.SHRINE #4 &#6 PLAN VIEW COLUMN CLADING PLAN VIEW COLUMN CLADING SCALE: t/2'= 1'r0' 4 L�: 1/2's 1'-0' • i5 SCALE:3'= -0" 7 SCALE:3'=1'-0' i .- - SCALE: 112"=i'-0' - ��� // ¢ARCHES IN QUANTITY l � INDICATES PLAN 17'-0"CmWHNGRID �- �,•`l PROI:ILE' • -- • • ,I'I- 13' 6' !L x—/1'3 • 6^ j - 923l2000• 4 i I' % 51.P•AFoN IN _—BRAHMA PREMANAND TEMPL I f, sr�IloN TIGARD, OREGON 97223 • _ • 1 • SHEET. 1 / ' _ ARCHITECT __ BLOG.SECTIONS & MISC.DETAILS I -' ---- -- -ARCH E VATION. -- _ I r �`� �/ 4A @SHRINE 5& #7 �� ,/ LOW PAIZi Q7LU11N 2/19/2001 ISSUED FOR BLDG.PERMIT 1 SCALE SIZE DWG NO . • REV. l -�+w ,nT_ -SCALE: 1/2'=1'-0 II-- �iSB SAMi�L 4/q g DATE , REV REVISION DESCRIPTION AS NOTED D A-OB ` - .,. • APPLICATION PACKET SUBMITTED APRIL, 2001 i 1 I MINOR MODIFICATION ��„�1�, APPLICATION I �.i,� TYPE I APPLICA O CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION • IProperty Address/Location(s): I 1 5(5 Sw' H ,q-LL Q 1-V 1), 1 l q / 17/ OZ 9 7 2-'2-,3 FOR STAFF USE ONLY ITax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 19 i b 5D A , TAX Lo'TS 14O 0 h. 350 3 Case•No:(s): Site Size: IOther Case No.(s): Applicant*: 51/./ rn I V i S V/91212P—Al A I` - Receipt No.: Address: I f S 15 G WI 11 A� G LAC Application Accepted By: aCity/State: 'Ti c1 D / O Zip: 9 7 2-2-3 Primary Contact: SA-M Aj)EIT T I LOA 11-- Date:, Phone: 50 3— 6,4-G.-3 0 C c 9 Fax: , -(,4 7(503 . • Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: (Attach list if more than one) Date Determined Complete: • Rev.3/5/2001 i:\curpin\masters\revised\minormod.mst 5 fi-rv►a AS Al-A el-4 cA,N1 T - ii Address: Phone: is City/State: Zip: 1 *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) (Note: applications will not be accepted must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this without the required submittal elements) form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY "pplication Form The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a Owner's Signature/Written Authorization IMinor Modification. To review a modification as a Minor Er Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion does not 2'Title Transfer Instrument or Deed invoke one or more of the 11 criteria discussed within Section 18.120.070(B) of the Tigard Development Code. If the modification Er Site Development Plan (3 copies) Iexceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the following criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") Modifications are processed in the same manner as a new Site Development Review. In a separate letter, please address the [L] Applicant's Statement(3 copies) Icriteria below contained in Section 18.360.050(B) including a detailed (Addressing Criteria Under Section 18.360.050(B) response to each criteria. Er Filing Fee (City) $100.00 I. An Increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. (Urban) $236.00 I2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.165. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s)by more than 20%. In addition, the Director must find that the I6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be proposed change complies with the underlying affected. standards of the applicable zoning district. To 1. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to exceed 100 complete this review, the Applicant's proposal vehicles per day. must include a discussion indicating how the 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10% excluding site expansion will continue to comply with the expansions under 5,000 square feet. minimum setback, building height, parking land 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the landscaping standards. Other applicable I open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more requirements such as minimum Clear Vision than ten percent areas near driveways and street intersections 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or, landscaping provisions) may also be applicable depending on where below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan. the building expansion is proposed to be II I. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not constructed on the site. the subject of Criteria 1 through 10 above. I I PLANNED DEVELOPMENT I �.- i1 TYPE III APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 IGENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): 11515 sw H L L_ "ri,> .. i • '.;.. f»N� :ta,:�<.;: ' ,.. x.�fn'^. .N^'Y"'"i!^17•',ttiaq }w a ;'- jFOR:STAFF::,„.;ONLY ;am y IS LV� TIG,4tZD 0g n722? ._-.,. :ORST.::.. :. ..r:.,:;- . - / .,.;,,:!,-„,,r. -°:it";°,,, �?,x,,,:,,-„4::-t....ze..,-+ a -,.. fit}.4:`.°.a` n•:d3 t.:anwk:,-2. .,�%= ;�x�u: xs:'t.•"rN�'�...1:?'�+,;;• ,-'';'� aa�" A.cera� r•t°.t. .?n .'• Tax Map &Tax Lot# s : , ,4, F ;;,a.. ',. -,-•,, :_r,4 I ( ) x 006*Nos , >=l. . , *=: • �' ixa x..,*;?i.4;;,...4.. f. :4,,Oi:•.:wli` 191 S 5 D ►�—'1 x LOTS Q'O 0 4 �S©� �:OtFie�CaseNo s a��: ���`°�,�.,��;k �„. .�;,�<i S Zt�d aAa�; • . .�`�'i:`� ` .�•:.�•y ''� ,eR+e 2' 2 5 ,c4 ;ReceiptT No : ':�... � . � A.• :: ; :w ...i-:: :c ,,° Site Size: l,_'. :. ;_r ' Application Acceptewd By::;z•° ,4 ....,..... ;t,:,...-. ,csj, Property Owner/Deed Holders 5 W�"N►i V r A �1� �:.�..��:: „,..�>�,.<<v� •_•..:•..:.,�,�,.' ��g-;�,;w,����:A i�-��-�:�}�::; Holder(s)*: c .:Y' ;a";=:Y;air:',=:-F4ty=%, �`t�3-'4".y.::;,i a j'`�i v���,...-4•, `.: ;Date. :” ''<.. ,..:•,�::, o... ���.�,� ;�:.�;:-..�1 ;;=��:��.,A IIS S 5 phone: ' ' :.>' �1� � :x si°^�:.?;�';-i,� M.r'�i 1•=�: `..ti��'^?, v, a"^'�. �,`C;: Address: I �-(,1 ra . ;2<< a'.:;,.„',.- ., '"�.,<•:4:1"�'".:. i..C`�"'•:'`s x'` <.'i 'fii T�.t..^.•:�r?�.;5��`�`��.v.S:,;:".:Ly:::A^���_ - T G p: 972 23 ...:,,, ,s.., _41. City: I D�'�17 Zi �'7 :ipatetDeterrriined Complete.�',_`.•���r�.::i='=�� ���,�:,• I Applicant': 197, n>0 .'. •. Re'.;.1.1115/2000'j i:\aupin\masterslrevised\pda°doc;•'. f,N;,.;'r.aS�?<•r:: `An``'i:Y° '.'f'• ":. ...,c.._'iai li•�'.:":'%,,..:;.:YY." •x:-.:. Address: Phone: 1 City: Zip: REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant without the required submittal elements) Imust be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written implication Form authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space �, � provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with l� Owner's Signature/Written Authorization this application. Etritle Transfer Instrument or Deed ❑ Copy of Pre-Application Conf. Notes IPROPOSAL SUMMARY ❑ Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) The owners of record of the subject property request permission to ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 81/2"x 11") I create a Planned Development consisting of(please be specific): ❑ Applicant's Statement IA I` s a 6 ATTA}C.(� a� (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ' ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card ? J a cr N.In j2 ^y Iv r //(4_ (Distributed/completed at application submittal) l �-h ❑ USA Service Provider Letter I P 1.1 4 `T .S jam} ) `J--- ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property Owner List Generated by the City . ❑ Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits & Notes ❑ Filing Fee (Detailed) $Applicabe SDR fee I (Conceptual) $2,170.00 • Urban: See Wa. Co. Fee Schedule 1 1 Ey z F U O a Urn SIM all MS UM I i O OM OM — i UM r NO MI SO V M ^^Nv I ,1\ PROJECT NARRATIVE .q) e7/, Project Name: Brahmapremananda Ashram & Temple ek--)\11\ .c.) IAddress: 11515 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223, Telephone: (503) 598-3073 The Brahmapremananda Ashram is an Oregon non-profit organization incorporated in April 1991 1 (240858-88) for the purpose of providing spiritual guidance and facilitating spiritual growth to people of all religions, race, and creed. The Brahmapremananda Ashram translates into English as, "Church for I the Love of God" and was founded by Swami Viswa Premananda. The purpose of this construction project is to provide a gathering place and visiting facilities for people engaged in the teaching, observance and practice of religious, ethical and philosophical principles shared by and/or of interest to Ithose people. Project Description: The project consists of two phases, (1) an addition to an existing building, the I "Ashram" and (2) the construction of a "Temple" at the above-referenced address. The Ashram will be remodeled to add an 8-room two-story addition to the existing facility at 11515 SW Hall Blvd., I Tigard, OR. The Temple is the place of community worship and will be built as a separate building approximately 50 feet northwest of the existing Ashram (see Site Plan). IPHASE 1-Ashram The total sq. ft for Ashram (living facilities) including the proposed addition is 3,456 sq. ft. The Ashram will include eight guest rooms, two bedrooms for the residents, and classrooms for meditation and yoga instructions as well as retreats. The Ashram will primarily consist of a meditation and yoga facility, lodging, and boarding for visiting monks or spiritual seekers. Yoga classes are currently held Ion a daily basis from 6 PM to 8 PM. The proposed addition will provide facilities for visitors who will be received and transported to the Ashram primarily on weekends, but occasionally after 6 PM on I weekdays. It should be noted that the primary average congregant and volunteer consist of working parents/families and individuals. IPHASE 2-Temple The proposed Temple will be a two-storied building and will encompass approximately 4,635 sq. ft. per I floor. The Temple use is primarily for worship. The Temple facility is generally used as a conventional church for congregation and social events on weekends. The Temple will consist of the main assembly area (Temple Hall), kitchen, classrooms, and a library. Approximately 178 chairs have I been planned for the main assembly (Temple Hall). The Temple will not include any residential area and will not be used for residential purposes. The Temple hours will be primarily on Saturdays and Sundays with an occasional meeting after 6 PM on weekdays. I Construction Schedule: The approximate date of the beginning of construction is April-May 2001 for Ithe Temple and Ashram. I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I April 19, 2001 The Planning Department City of Tigard Planning 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 MINOR MODIFICATION TYPE I APPLICATION Project Name:Brahmapremananda Ashram&Temple Address:11515 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223, Telephone: (503) 646-9069 Dear Sir/Madam: Response to Section 18.360.050(B) Criteria. 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. ' -There is no change in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. 1 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. -There is no change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. -The change in plan does not require additional on-site parking because of no additional rooms or seating arrangement. As a matter of fact, proposed five parking spaces from the old plan have been removed. Currently available parking spaces include 2 handicapped and 96 shared giving a total of 98 spaces. Please note that the guest rooms do not need a parking spot per guest because these are simply guests (and not permanent resident) and these guests are monks WHO DO NOT HAVE A CAR OR DRIVE A CAR, thus not requiring any parking for guest rooms. 1 I Minor Modification Application Project Name: Brhamapremananda Ashram/Temple,Tigard Page No. 2 Date 04/19/2001 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. -The architectural features of the proposed structure have changed, however, the proposed structure is still a temple structure and not for any commercial or industrial usage. The structure is being ' built by a non-profit organization. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%. -The original height was 33 feet above curb E1.223. The proposed total height is 53 feet, which INCLUDES dead height/space of 31.5 feet, thus, the actual comparable height(53 minus 31.5) has, in our opinion, actually reduced. 6. A change in the type and location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. -There is no change in the type and location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. -There is no increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site for temple or ashram visit. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10% excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. -The old temple plan showed proposed temple building area of 4,500sq.ft/floor. The new temple plan sfidws 4,635-sq.ft./floor. The old ashram plan showed proposed residential use area of 3,360(excluding existing residential area) and new ashram plan shows proposed residential use area of 3,456 sq.ft. (including existing residential area), thus, there is reduction is floor space. This ' primarily occurred because the ashram building length was actually reduced to achieve a 20-ft setback from east property line (front yard). Therefore, there is no increase in area for non- residential use by more than 10%. 1 1 Minor Modification Application Project Name: Brhamapremananda Ashram/Temple, Tigard ' Page No. 3 Date 04/19/2001 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than ten percent. -There is no reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that ' reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than ten percent. As a matter of fact, the new landscape plan shows additional 12/14- '1 ft tall trees along the western property line in order to provide a tree buffer to hide the building from neighbors view. -The proposed Temple appears to be an ideal development for a landlocked property since we are providing 52,000 sq.ft. of landscape areas!!! and the site coverage of less than 40%!!!. Please note that the Temple group paid more than $50,000 to purchase the adjacent land to preserve ' existing trees in the northern portion. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where specified by the site plan. -There is no reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where specified by the site plan. As a matter of fact, the new landscape plan shows additional 12/14-ft tall trees alone the western property line in order to provide a tree buffer to hide the building from neighbors view. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed by the time of Site Development Review 1 • approval that is not subject of Criteria 1 through 10 above. -There are no modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review ' approval that are not subject of-Criteria 1 through 10 above. The new plans show all modifications that were required by the conditions of approval of the old CUP permit CUP1999-00002/VAR1999- 00024/MIS1999-00026. In summary these modifications include (a) showing locations of bicycle racks and lighting (b) removing five parking spaces from the site (c) clearly marked walkways (d) details on floor spaces under notes (e) note regarding hours of operations (f) notes regarding ' impervious and landscape surfaces. I Minor Modification Application pp on Project Name: Brhamapremananda Ashram/Temple, Tigard ' Page No. 4 Date 04/19/2001 ' Additional Comments The setbacks shown on ro osed new plan satisfy the city code requirements. The old setback P P dimensions were simply dimensions and NOT planned setbacks because they were NOT shown as ' setbacks or refereed to as setbacks. ' The referenced project is a 'non-profit organization'project, which is entirely funded by private donations. The volunteer group handling the project did not clearly understand the regulations with respect to PD and other planning issues. We never understood that it was difficult to make changes to PD approvals. We had simply made a conceptual plan based on available funding at that time. Unfortunately, none of the City staff ever mentioned this despite knowing (through staff meetings ' and telephone conversations) that the revised plans were being prepared and changes were being made. Since the conceptual planning (which was based on donation funds available at that time), we have been approached by generous donors who specifically have requested to build a traditional temple building. Hence, the changes have been made to the original conceptual plan. ' As described earlier, in our opinion, based on the city code criteria, the proposed modifications are indeed minor modifications. Therefore, we request the city to approve the minor modification application. Please call us at 503-646-9069 if any questions. ' Sincerely, Y Sam Adettiwar ' Project Manager 1 1 ' COMPARISON TABLE 1 ITEM OLD PLAN NEW PLAN ' Proposed Temple Building Area 4,500 sq.ft./floor 4635 sq.ft./floor P P ' Proposed Ashram Addition Area for 3360 sq.f.t.(doesn't 3,456 sq.ft. (includes Residential Use include existing exiting residential area) residential area) ' Temple Basement Level FF. E1.217 FF. E1.217 ' Temple Upper Level FF. EI.226 FF. E1.230 Temple Height above curb E1.223.0 33ft 53ft (includes Kalashas- ' peaks, which is dead space/height of 31.5 ft.) ' Setback- Front yard 20ft 20ft Setback- Side yard 20ft 20ft Inside chair /sitting arrangement 178 seats 178 or less ' Parking Required - 74 spaces 101 (96 plus 5 98 (6 handicapped, 23 additional proposed- compact) - Only 2 new which was denied) handicapped and 96 shared. 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I NEIGHBORHOOD MTG AFFIDAVITS & NOTES I I I I I I I I I I AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE N:: =. ::CALENDAR;DAYS;0v.:mE:S.:G. ,.::<.. STING;: : : ;>::N pgs AFEIDAyq TO VYITHIN.SEVE.::.('�. Gxty T�.gard.. • OR::>9:7 223:::::;.::;::' ::>' ':'' `>.:;:;:> :<>: 1 , I, SArm 47C) T T'w412... , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed _ '131z41-1 M'r Pt2am AwAtc 94 TG-m'U ffecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently ' registered) 11515- 5w LvD -Da 97223 , and did on the 17+ ' day of 1 /21)/4-12-y 2.0 o 12 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a "TEMP A-5-HP-A-1,4 P D application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. ' The sign was p osted at �i E ENTp,� CE TO Th E S I re / T 1-1 ) LV D k AT E CNN p F A-c c-I✓ss Rc /4D .w pi 'fk E s 1TI- A-R- -A 66G t rsJS (state location you posted notice on property) 1 ' Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of 19_. NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: • I (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) !NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: 13 2 M r' av /a A30 14 TT1-- P L&--, TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: C. '-M P( f / / N R*NV\ P I I Name of Applicant/Owner: A d d r e s s or General Location of Subject Property: I I SI& S W }1 A to giALT . T 14 et12-1) S 017 211-)1—-C LSubject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): 1 5'15 5 3) ' 17 LOTS I i ea X- 35 • I hNopin\pattyYnastets\affpostmst I AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 1 • • STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard I 5,1-r 1 AID ETT71JA-fZ. , being duly sworn, depose and say that on M #i"12 Cif 2— ,2$0_1_,$01., I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) I 1 615 f-1,4 1.- C� t-v.D , 1-1414-(2..D, o R 17 vz._)3 a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 13,914 s 't11 ic2-4 F'1t,)A-yam i;�� _ ht l.t� r012 7) with postage prepaid thereon. Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of , 19_. 1 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: I (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: . , 9A-- L `,,;w / Jfy/P TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: G P/ TE-1►'�P -. ( S I. 1 4(') fi I I I Name of Applicant/Owner. y I S 1ti/ �(LEnn�} 1�1�?+�I Ar4 !Address or General Location of Subject Property: • : wD ■ ti ' • - I (Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): I _ 171. I.oTS 14 0 1� 35 D J h:Yop irOpattOrnasterslatfmailmst I 1 1 3/02/2001 RE: Brahma Bremananda Ashram 11515 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Interested Party, I, Sam Adettiwar, am representing the owners of the referenced property and vacant lot p g land immediately north and west. The affected tax lots are 1400 and 1800 of map 1s1, 35DA. We are proposing to build an addition to the existing house and isolated temple north of the existing house. The existing house at 11515 SW Hall will be retained and remodeled. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend the meeting on: Thursday, March 22nd, 2001 Tigard City Hall, at the: Town Hall Meeting Room 13125 SW Hall Boulevard 1 Tigard, OR 97223 7:00 pm Please notice this will be an informal meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-646-9069 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Sam Adettiwar,MS, PE Senior Engineer I 1 t NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Date: March 22, 2001, 6.30PM, City of Tigard Hall, Tigard, OR Project: BrahamaPremananda Ashram/Temple Project I NAME ADDRESS PHONE NO. i s 1 :E/ 4/f�- � ys /Y4/ L//-�5 �e 5A 3 - 2 g�-- l� 3yy/9, 1,1 LtS� 9 C ( �o - vl S �07ti'L � �- ��D- ��qo if)Q3a3Jx,4-- 119 zis � C(5 3v corn t ., (A S-0 Scrvv3y - d r 4- cc 7 a so .1...S 3_ AL I /01-5 o fr-1 Scker7d el ye—c— ° 2-?2� PtniAk 10) �2G1 H 2 i L(U s= Do 5-a,1- 7r7-/oGi I NC,T As NG16-1-t43pg I I I I I I 1 I .11. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Date: March 22, 2001, 6.30PM, City of Tigard Hall, Tigard, OR Project: BrahamaPremananda Ashram/Temple Project Meeting Notes: �v��'1 1 eni; 1° 191/11s, 1Pwc.isc " r cv116 YLZ ctsi 9,t,t IA/Jo-1,4 Aorviz � s h a4 n -I h �i C- c4-1-41 9 P-e5rovis — P Lx c cA/,'► 1 toe. se/ii 4-0 d"ti S c S r is G � S 1 h H 45,1J ris,vv)c- _ k-/-1:11± i � cA Gt.12 + o 3Z rkms w; 11 s� ,'I I, I I NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING 1 Date: March 22, 2001, 6.30PM, City of Tigard Hall, Tigard, OR Project: BrahamaPremananda Ashram/Temple Project ' Meeting Notes: L t, �. oityl c i Pvie- ,(1 vh c.) rt,.%/1 3 121spci»se — Y r s ___ e 111. 11530 1,cm�; S a/w► W 1.%o Ld (7''1-3'l s 'L J)4'vo vJ — h-cci 2 `-o vee 0 3 A_ 1-0 c v)s S (7t� k►`e,t.J FUN/11s c=t,ls o % I I I 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 I USA SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 04/06/01 09:57 FAX 5038463641 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY igioul-uul ,7r� r � r 11 . O 5 V i MAR 2'1 2001 11, File Number �4 By I . ensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment Unib.d S.w.' a Agoncy at Waching$MCaunry ..urisdiction Cu r ol- )rg etiJ . Date 03/17/3e4 f Map&Tax Lot 15'i 3$ DA iAX L6i3 Owner aR Iii MR f'r-6M,AN /t} Site Address 1400 !c. 3_503 _ 7f3h'7r.4M tislS; , H 4t4- Gty..D Contact S ati Proposed Activity TI Aid-fD, r7 f� Address 121 - Nv■/ M V (' 4 I _ •� 1*:e- e el l BI _S T 10 Z Gx't?7LA O, Olt imic ' Phone Svs -64 G -. 0 6S I. • Y N`NA Y N NA •III n1 USA Composi a Ma Starrriw "r his' structure maps ❑ u Map# , 1' 1 QS# � ❑ ❑ Locally adopted studies or maps Specify Specify Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of USA Design and • Construction Standards Resolution and Order 00-7: ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site.THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM .A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVrCE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas I exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. 1 Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect • water quality sen.:itive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your I property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. • 1 ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE . ASSESSMENT OFt SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: I Reviewed Sy: 0`G d9tt .* , ....2-il. Date: •--9- of II , . . Returned to Applicant Mail aaX Counter` ! to e ay. I pay, ttlIp- 9C-110 ZOU,, ADN'39v awro.m3S d3IdINlt ' trausparo; Xvd or:bt 1oi i/ 9 t;u C/1 0 0 A4 NM 111111 — r O. OW — OM MS ei UN ON MI OM O CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST I Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a Idecision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact Ithe staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: *OA Yon Date: 3/13/01 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in • the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). 1 Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes a Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): tVicinity Map VES-reliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan Existing Conditions Map reliminary Utilities Plan 11 ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map VPreliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑/Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan ree Preservation/Mitigation Plan 57-Site Development Plan Architectural Drawings andscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings L9 Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends o he type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES ZJ =COPIES OF ALL Arr=Li.AT■,N MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist - Page 1 of 5 • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS $ Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis t Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ID Geotechnical Report ❑ Other I5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend I and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8YA x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A 1 LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). • Vicinity Map i Showing the location of the site in relation to: I • Adjacent properties ❑ . • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ 1 • Transit stops El• Utility access ❑ IExisting Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ a Contour lines (2'intervals for 0-10%slopes or 5'for slopes>10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands III Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ I • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: I • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with>_6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and t..3ir::acs ❑ Locations of existing utilities and ep,iern3r.,-.. ❑ 1 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map I The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ I Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided INames of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ID lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2'intervals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ ,1 The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ ,I. • Major power telephone transmission lines(50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ I • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances Ill• The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures I are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements El Existing natural features including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions,and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ IPreliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ IThe owner's authorized agent El The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ I Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines(2'intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes>10%) ❑ Location,width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ I Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ II I I . City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 I Site Development Plan i The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: I • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ I • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ 1 • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ I • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas CI The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which Iare located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ 111 • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting-considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: I • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials Cl I Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ 11 • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan 111 = Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ _ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 1 1 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 1 Grading/Erosion Control Plan i The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ - • Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ IUtilities Plan IApproximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ IPreliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ I, Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ ITree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ 1 Architectural Drawings IFloor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ I I II I I ii:\;curpin\masters\revised\checklist.doc 5-Jun-00 I 1 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 PRE_-APPLICATION. CONFERENCE NOTES Alro t v ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q :.c1�NTlganuregoa I Development 'Shaping A Better .w Community 'PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Mapis): 1S1 35DA Tax lolls): 1400,1500 a 3503 IUse Type: Swami Temple The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant 1 will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned I commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. I Right-of-way dedication: 11 The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. I Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Hall Boulevard to 45 feet from centerline (convey to ODOT). I ❑ SW to feet I ❑ SW to feet I ❑ SW to feet IStreet improvements: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: I ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb I ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk I ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. IFITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 glneering Department Section IEl Other: I ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement I ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities I ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees I ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: . I I ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement I ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees I ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: . I ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: I ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb I ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk I ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. I ❑ Other: . ■ ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: I ❑ feet orf pavement ❑ concrete curb ID storm sewers and other underground utilities I ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 gloeerlag Department Sectloa 1 ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year year streetlight fee. I ❑ Other: . . I Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval I may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: I (1.) . 1 (2.) . IOverhead Utility Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines I adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to I $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Hall I Boulevard. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. I Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in SW Hall Boulevard, and a 3-inch pressure service line is located in the private driveway that leads to this site from Hall Boulevard. The pressure line was installed as a part of the Hall Park Office development, III and is intended to serve this site. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to provide the necessary onsite pumping system to allow connection and use of the 3-inch pressure line. t IWater Supply: I The Tualatin Valley Water District (Phone:(503) 642-1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. I Fire Protection: I CITY OFTICARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 9Ineerfon Department Section Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Onsite detention is required. Submit a preliminary plan and sizing calculation to show what system will be used. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. 1 Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. J Traffic: ODOT will likely have the same concerns about peak period management of trip generation from this site. ODOT has previously suggested that the City require the applicant to adjust their usage schedules to minimize trip generation during the AM and PM peak hours. 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 1jglnoering Department Section In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF. ,PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. This type of permit requires a non-refundable $150.00 fee. In certain cases, where City costs may exceed the $150.00 fee, an administrative deposit will be required. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. This type of permit requires a deposit to be submitted with the construction plans. The amount of the deposit depends upon the overall value of the public improvements. The City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. I CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 IllogluserIng Depert®eat Section IBuilding Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 1 503-639-4171, ext. 304. I Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading I and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. IBuilding Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. I Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all ( ) P 9 Y 9 work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This Ipermit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. I For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. I Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. I 'GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS I All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in I determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall I include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. I I PREPARED BY: i♦ , 3 1 ( I INEERING DEPA'TMENT STAFF Phone: (5031639-4111 Fax: (5031684-1291 I ngtbrianr\templatestpreap notes-eng.dot ITY OF TICARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 gineering Department Section w Z a all =I MIS GO MO OW SIM IND ea NO OS MO 1E11 OS MO MI Ole OS 11111• ir--09-99 06 : 33A P - 02 STATE OF OREGON 11 . Cc_sty et watt•iin t SS 1. Jerry R..Hanson, Director of Assess- ? Altar Recording Return To: merit and Taxallon and Ex-Officio County T.A Sherwood,Esti. Clerk for said county,'do hereby-certify that Suite 2D3 the within'rnetrumegt of writing was received 16325 SW Booties Ferry Re. and recorded in book'pt re.cords of said I Lake Oswego.OR 470)S county. i . Jerry R. Hanson.'Director of Assessmcnt and Taxation, Ex- Officio County Clerk Doc : 97085693 Rect: 194148 53 . 09/15/1997 03: 15: 51pm RECIPROCAL UCENSE FOR PARKING IEFFECTED BY AND BETWEEN Brahmapremananda Ashrama, which took title as Brahma Premananda Ashram, an Oregon non-profit corporation, herein called"First Parry"and Michael J.Nedelisky,herein called "Second Party". RECITALS: A. First Party is the owner of the land situated in Section 35,Township 1 South.Range 1 West of the Willamette s Merl ild' in n, th e City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described at Exhibit 4 annexed hereto and by this Ireference incorporated herein as if fully set forth,herein called the`Temple Property", and B. Second Party is the owner the land situated in Section 35,Township 1 South.Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridan.in the City of Tigard. County of Washington and State of Oregon. more particularly described at Exhibit S annexed hereto and by this 1 reference incorporated herein as if fully set forth,herein called the"Office Property",and C. The Temple Property and the Office Property are situated contiguous with each other and share a common means of vehicular II and pedestrian access and egress to and from the public roadway known as S.W.Hall Boulevard(County Road No.947),and D. The Temple Property is committed to use by the First Party as the site and location of buildings and related improvements, including spaces and facilities for parking of passenger motor vehicles, designed and intended to provide a gathering place and residence for persons engaged in the teaching,observance and practice of certain religious,ethical and philosophical principals shared by andlar of interest to those persons. E. The Office Property is committed to use by Second Party as the site and location of buildings and related improvements, I including spaces and facilities for parking of passenger motor vehicles,suitable for use as office facilities, space and accamrnudations employed for the conduct of business and commercial activities of one or more parties in ownership or tenancy of the Office Property, their employees,customers.patrons,clients,suppliers,service providers and business invitees.and iF. The uses to which the Temple Property and the Office Property are committed by the respective parties, each require that persons having reason to be present on said properties will have space in which to park and leave motor vehicles unattended while such persons are engaged in residence or otherwise present an such properties in connection with the uses to which they are Icommitted by the parties as aforesaid,and G. The parties acknowledge that the spaces and facilities provided for parking of motor vehicles on their respective properties may, from time-to-time, but at different times, prove to be inadequate to accommodate the number of vehicles which require space Inc parking in connection with uses of the buildings and improvements located thereon,and N. The parties desire and intend to pool or share their available parking spaces and facilities to the end that adequate parking will I be available for all persons who may now or hereafter have reasonable cause or need to park motor vehicles in or upon the Temple Property or the Office Property, _ THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the rights and responsibilities of the parties Iestablished hereunder,it is hereby, acknowledged,confirmed and agreed as follows: RECIPROCAL LICENSE I + 5 PACE 1 of 3 : r-09-99 06 : 33A � P . 03 1 1. License Granted First Party. Second Party does hereby and irrevocably give, grant and convey to First Party,its successors I in interest and assigns, license to permit parking of lawfully licensed and operational motor vehicles designed and actually used for the purpose of transporting passengers to and from any buildings or other improvements now or hereafter erected on the Temple Property. The license afforded under this paragraph extends to all and any unoccupied exterior spaces or areas situated on the Office I Property which are regularly designated and used or available for parking of motor vehicles of the kind mentioned above between the hours of 6:00 o'clock P.M.and 6:00 o'clock A.M.on weekdays Monday through Thursday and between the hour of 6:00 o'clock P.M. each Friday through the hour of 6:00 o'clock A.M. the next following Monday morning. The license afforded hereunder shall nat I supersede restrictions on parking imposed by public authorities, or which may be otherwise established or required by Second Party for purposes of facilitating, affording or reserving space for parking,use,access.egress or maneuvering of delivery,waste removal or emergency vehicles. I 2. License Granted Second Party. First Party does hereby and irrevocably give, grant and convey to Second Party, his successors in interest and assigns, license to permit parking of lawfully licensed and operational motor vehicles designed and actually used for the purpose of transporting passengers to and from any buildings or other improvements now or hereafter erected on the I Office Property. The license afforded under this paragraph extends to all and any unoccupied exterior spaces or areas situated on the Temple Property which are regularly designated and used or available for parking of motor vehicles of the kind mentioned above between the hours of 6:00 A.M.and 6:00 P.M.each weekday,Monday through Friday,inclusive.The license afforded hereunder shall I not supersede any restrictions on parking imposed by pubic authorities,or which may be otherwise established or required by First Party for purposes of facilitating,affording or reserving space for parking of delivery or emergency vehicles. 3. Additional licenses Permitted:Limitation. Nothing contained in this instrument shall be deem or construed to limit or impair I the right or prerogative of either First Party or Second Party to,from time-to-time,grant or afford to the other parry, or to the other party's perrnittees, written license or permission to use some portion or all of such party's parking facilities ar spaces at times,or for purposes,different from or in addition to those times and purposes expressly licensed hereunder on such terms and conditions as such I party may, in the exercise of its sole discretion, determine therein called "Temporary License"). Provided, however, that any Temporary License may be revoked or modified in any respect or particular in the sole and unfettered discretion of the party affording the same at any time upon delivery or posting of written notice to the other party or to any third party or parties to whom such Temporary license or permission may have been afforded. AU persons or entities who shall avail themselves of any rights or I prerogatives afforded under any Temporary License shall be conclusively deemed to have exercised any rights or prerogatives exercised by such persons or entities under color of such Temporary License and shall not, by reason of such exercise,have, claim or be deemed to have acquired, any rights, or title or interest in the premises affected by such exercise, by prescription. adverse Ipossession or under any other principle or rule whatsoever whether cognizable at law or in equity. 4. Notice of Licenses. The licenses afforded hereunder may be exercised only by persons to whom permission is granted by the respective licensees. First Party and Second Party will therefore,each and respectively, provide,or cause to be furnished,to all and I any persons to whom such permission is granted,written evidence of such permission in a form which such persons may display upon or within their vehicfe(sl in such a manner as to be readily visible from the exterior thereof. Each party hereby'acknowfedges and agrees that the other party, or its tenants or others lawfully entitled to occupy such party's property or any poniards) thereof, shall I have the unqualified right and prerogative to remove any vehicle parked on such party's property which does not display evidence it is parked with permission in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this paragraph. 5. Disclaimer of Liability. Neither First Party nor Second Party shall be liable to the other or to any third party or parties Iwhomsoever,for any loss.damage-or injury of any kind or nature whatsoever incurred or suffered by any person,personal property or any vehicle while present on such party's property by reason of the licenses granted hereunder.regardless of the cause of such loss, damage or injury. Each party hereby covenants and agrees with the other that it will post notice and otherwise inform all persons I who may now or at any time hereafter avail themselves of any right or license provided hereby, that by entering on such party's property for any purpose, such persons assume all risk of loss, damage and injury to themselves, any vehicle owned, operated or parked by or for the benefit of such person,and any other personal property brought upon or left of such party's property by or for the I benefit of such person. 6. Duration:Partials Bound and Benefited. The license granted to First Party hereunder shall remain in effect for so long as the Temple Property snag be and remain committed to the uses set forth in Recital 0 of this instrument The license granted to Second I RECIPROCAL LICENSE a PAGE 2 of 3 :. -09-99 06 : 34A P _04 I. . - .. . Party hereunder shall remain in effect for so long as the Office Property shall be and remain committed to the uses set forth in Recital I E of this instrument. Should either license afforded hereunder expire by reason of the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, such expiration shall not in any way affect,diminish or impair the rights afforded under the other license afforded hereunder. The licenses afforded hereunder and the terms and conditions herein contained shall run with the lands affected thereby and shall bind and inure to I the benefit of the First Party and the Second Party,their respective heirs.successors in interest, assigns and all other persons now or at any time hereafter having or claiming any right,title or interest in their respective propert •s by reason of any tenancy arrangement. lien or other encumbrance whatsoever. ""WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have each caused ttf ent ' ' e e. t d and acknowledged effective on the latest date set forth below. 1 2 . BRAHMAPREMANANDA ASHRAMA,an Oregon - _,- _ �� • __ �'' 1 J.N LISKY, cond Party corporation, First Party ty I BY c---- - - Swami Viswa Premananda,President By Bharat Nai c,Secretary State of Oregon.County of (1 Ct. .ve,U S } s.s. 9 try` This instrument was acknowledged before me on Alit s . 2(g , 1991, by SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA as President of Brahmapre . .nda Ashrama, a reaon nen•pMtrfit corporation. _.t V !a; OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Public for Oregon an �l BROOKE IC-OREGON y ry Expires 9 Al 3AZr�J l77� NOr*RYPUeLIC-e EGoN M Commission COMMISSION NO.05.:o.>5 r r ICY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 03.2000 . State of Oregon,County of__UALLLIZIAMI s.s. This instrument 1.-o. lodged before �C / ,,0 1997 This :.....iucfi� -was acknowledged before Tit on E �y�. v by Bharat Naik as Secretary of Brahmaprentananda Ashram�an Oreg�9n non-prod corporation. -� OFFICIAL SEAL 1 i I . - '. �ooR>E ty,�.y 1 tare Public for Oregon r r •-,. NOTAAYPUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires 1Q j�jf 2 V?()cou_I—• MY COMMISSION tEXPIRES JU i 1 State of Oregon,County of C\�, 1\-rt F ) s-s. '� This instrument was�cknowledgec4efore m_a on c� 1 , 1997, by Michael J.Ne>ielisky. �` I x2W OFFICIAL SINL L CH EU R491N L COCH Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires (-- -M.,- qg -° NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ..:''. COMMtSS!ON NO.047166 11 My COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT 27. 1999 IRECIPROCAL LUCEJSF 3 PAGE 3 of 3 Air-09-99 06: 34A P . 05 F'-15-lyyl 1 :14 7ransnat Lon Title Ins. > bd.-1 .V� I. 'EXHIBIT A' to fifaPROCAL Waal FOSPARKING Meal le Properwl 1 A TRACT COMPRISED OF LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCELS I, H AND III IN DEED RECORDED JANUARY 5, 1995. AS FEE NO. 95001169, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN THE CITY OF 'TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, II OREGON. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 10, 1995, AS FEE NO.95055808,RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON.MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT OONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 53; THENCE NORTH 21'0700'EAST,A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED IRECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NORTH 87°57'01' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE'POINT OF BEGINNING';THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 2°03'00' EAST,A DISTANCE OF 37.33 FEET;THENCE NORTH 49°06423'WEST, A DISTANCE OF 91.68 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 1 TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 85055808; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 8718'19" WEST.A DISTANCE OF 107.57 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT;THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT SOUTH 2°57-13' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 94.85 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; 1 THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT SOUTH 87°5701'EAST.A DISTANCE OF 180.47 FEET TO THE"POINT OF BEGS/HINT. IMamas 90,067 square feet,more Of less) • 1 1 I 1 1 llr-09-99 06 : 34A P . 06 17-1'±:4'( 15: 14 Transna'.Ion i it le Ins. Lo :113 aW .4 U I -EXHIBIT e- to RECIPROCIU acme FOR PARING ('Off'ia Prepare/1 A TRACT COMPRISED OF LANG DESCRIBED IN DEEDS RECORDED AUGUST 10,1995 AS FEE NO'S 95055810 AND 95055812 AND PART OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055809. RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH,RANGE 1 WEST.WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,W THE CITY OF TIGARD,WASHWGTO$COUNTY IN THE STATE OF OREGON BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS_ COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATION LAND CUM NO. 53; THENCE NORTH 2'03'00'EAST,A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.85055808 AND THE"POINT OF BEGINNING";PIERCE ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID TRACT NORTH 87'S7111"WEST. A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET;THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH UNE NORTH 2°0700'EAST,A DISTANCE OF 37.38 FEET;THENCE I NORTH 411°06'23'WEST,A DISTANCE OF 91.68/FEET TO PIE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 87°58'19' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 107.57 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT;THENCE ALONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID TRACTS.RECORDED AS FEE NO.95055810 AND I 95055812 NORTH 02.57'13°EAST A DISTANCE OF 283.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF STATE HIGHWAY N0. 217; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE ON A 11,310_16 FOOT RADIUS NOH TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST (CHORD BEARS SOUTH 49•34'48" EAST. - 420.55 FEET) A DISTANCE OF 420.69 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.951155812 SAID UNE ALSO I BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 19.8LOCX'O','METZGER ACRE TRACTS',THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89•03'05' WEST.A DISTANCE OF 105.32 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.95055610: THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECOROED AS FEE NO.95055808 111 SOUTH 2'0300'WEST,A DISTANCE OF 115.07 FEET TO THE 701NT OF BEGINNI1NG'. (Carrtsins St 133 square Teat:mare or Iess1 1 1 I TOTAL P.03 1-09-99 06: 35A P- 07 - - STATE CF OREGON y 1 SS AFTER RECORDING RUM TO: County of Washington• Themes A.Shammed.EN. I. Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assess- 18.323 S W.Names Ferri Roil.Suits 203 moat and 'Taxation and Ex-Officio County Laka asrwpe OR 97035 Clerk for into county,do hereby'cartify that the withininetrument of writing vwas raccived and recorded in book of record,;:.of said county. ` _ • • Jerry RI=Ffaneon:-director or •'Assesement'andrraxation, Ex- , Officio.Counry Clerk Doc : 97085692 Rect: 194148 78. 00 1 09/15/1997 03: 15: 51prn DECLARATION OF EASEMENT RECITALS WHEREAS,the undersigned Brahmapremanartda Ashrama, which took title as Brahma Premananda Ashram, an ' Oregon non-profit corporation. herein called "Grantor",is the owner in fee simple of a certain tract of land situated in Section 35. Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described at Exhibit A annexed hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if fully set forth, herein called "Servient Premises", and WHEREAS, the undersigned Michael J. Nedelisky, herein called "Grantee", is the owner in fee simple of that certain tract of land situated in Section 35, Tawnship 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard,County of Washington and State of Oregon. more particularly described at Exhibit B annexed hereto and by this reference'incorporated herein as if fully set forth, herein called "Grantee's Premises", and WHEREAS,by instrument recorded as Fee No. 88-9619, in the records of Washington County, Oregon, on March 9, 1988, Woodrow W. Hughes, David W. Hughes and William Blue. as the -Grantors" therein named, entered ' into an Agreement For Shared Drive Easement And Maintenance, with Kinder-Care, Inc., a corporation, therein named as "Grantee" (herein called"Kinder-Care Agreement"I, affording to the said Kinder-Care, Inc., certain rights of access affecting a portion of the Servient Premises subject to certain affirmative undertakings on the part of said Kinder-Care, Inc:, to maintain and repair, and bear the cost of maintenance and repair, of that portion of the Servient Premises affected by said agreement all as therein provided for, and WHEREAS, by instrument recorded as Fee No. 94033952, in the records of Washington County, Oregon, on April 8, 1994, the said Woodrow W. Hughes, David W. Hughes and William Blue, as the `Grantors" therein named. entered into an Agreement For Shared Drive Easement And Maintenance, with Carl Eshelman, therein named as "Grantee" (herein called "Eshelman Agreement"), affording to the said Carl Eshelman certain,rights of access affecting a portion of the Servient Premises subject to certain affirmative undertakings on the part of said Carl Eshelman, to maintain and repair, and bear the cast of maintenance and repair, of that portion of the Servient Premises affected by said agreement all as therein provided far, and WHEREAS, by their terms, both the Kinder-Care Agreement and the Eshelman Agreement provide: ' This Easement and Maintenance Agreement shall be deemed to run with the land and shall inu re to the benefit of and be binding upon Grantee, Grantors and their respective heirs, successors and assigns, DECLARATION OF EASEMENT j - 10 • Page 1 of 8 Pages .11-09-99 06: 35A P . 08 and WHEREAS, the Grantor and the Grantee named herein each desire and intend that they and each of them and their respective successors in interest, transferees, assigns. lessees, tenants and invitees shall now and for all time hereafter have the unqualified right and ability to use. enjoy, occupy, improve, re-improve, construct improvements, reconstruct improvements. develop and redevelop, sell, lease, rent and otherwise deal with all premises, parcels and tracts of land which the Grantor and the Grantee, or either of their number, or their respective successors in interest, transferees, assigns, lessees, tenants and invitees, shall now or hereafter own or acquire the right to use or occupy which may at anytime benefit from the rights of use and easements created hereunder whether or not such premises. parcels and tracts of land are now owned, occupied or used by Grantor or Grantee, all to the highest and best use which may be made of said premises, parcels or tracts of land, and WHEREAS, it is the purpose of this instrument to establish and create in favor of the Grantee, perpetual non- exclusive rights and interests in the Servient Premises in every way sufficient to accomplish the desires and intent ' of the Grantor and Grantee above-stated and to hereby define, fix and establish in perpetuity, for the benefit of each of their number, their said successors in interest. transferees, assigns, lessees, tenants and invitees respectively, the uses and purposes for which the Servient Premises shall be committed, employed, improved and ' maintained without in any manner effecting conveyance of the fee title to the Servient Premises or any portion thereof, ' AGREEMENT - • In consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual declarations and agreements herein contained and set forth, it is hereby COVENANTED AND AGREED by and between the Grantor and the Grantee, each with the other, as follows: 1. Easement for Surface Access and Euress. The Servient Premises shall be, and are hereby, declared and subjected to a common, non-exclusive easement and right of way for surface vehicular and pedestrian access to and egress from the whole of all adjoining tracts of land now owned, or which are hereafter acquired, by the Grantor or by the Grantee, including, but not limited to, the Grantee's Premises above described, and which lie within, or, as the case may be, which lie contiguous with,'any portion of the Servient Premises, the Grantee's Premises or both of said premises, whether or not any such adjoining tracts of land so owned shall, now or ' hereafter, be described in gross or as separate parcels or tracts; whether or not any or all of said adjoining tracts of land shall be improved or developed to any extent whatsoever, and at such time or times as the same shall be improved, developed and used, to whatever extent any or all of said adjoining tracts shall be lawfully improved, I developed and used at any time in the future. The easements and rights of way established and created hereby shall run with the lands subjected thereto, and the lands benefited thereby, and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Grantor and the Grantee and their respective heirs, successors in interest and assigns. 2. Easement for Utilities and Services. Subject to requirements, regulations, restrictions now, or at any time hereafter, lawfully imposed by duly constituted governmental authorities, the Servient Premises shall be, and are ' hereby, declared and subjected to a common, non-exclusive easement and right of way for the underground, surface and above-ground installation, construction, reconstruction, placement, use and maintenance of utilities services and their associated conduits, equipment, components, pipes, conductors, controls, metering and 1 DECLARATION OF EASEMENT Page 2 of 8 Pages , -09-99 06:35A P _ O9 I:. I monitoring devices, connections,inlets, outlets. vaults, means of access and means of support whether below, on, or above the surface of the land, including, but not limited to, water service of any description; sanitary sewer collection, storage, processing, pumping andlor disposal; storm sewers, rain drains, catchment, control andlor I drainage of surface and above ground runoff from lands and improvements; electric services and electricity; telecommunications of every description, fire mains and hydrants;natural gas transmission. and generally all other additional or other equipment or installations which may, from time to time, become necessary or convenient for I purposes of rendering necessary utilities and services available to, and adequate for development and use of, the whole of all adjoining tracts of land now owned, or which are hereafter acquired, by the Grantor or by the Grantee,including but not limited to the Grantee's Premises above described, which lie within, or, as the case may I be, which he contiguous with any portion of the Servient Premises, the Grantee's Premises or both of said premises, whether or not any such adjoining tracts of land so owned shall be, now or hereafter, described in gross or as separate parcels or tracts; whether or not any or all of said adjoining tracts of land shall be improved or I developed to any extent whatsoever, and, at such time or times as the same shall be improved, developed and used, to whatever extent any or all of said adjoining tracts shah be lawfully improved, developed and used at any time in the future. 1 3. Easement for Monuments. Signs and Billboards. Subject to requirements, regulations, restrictions now, or at any time hereafter. imposed by duly constituted governmental authorities, the Servient Premises described shall be, and are hereby, declared and subjected to a common. nonexclusive easement for construction, Ireconstruction, installation, use and maintenance of permanent monuments, signs or.billboards placed solely for the purpose of identifying by name(s), address(es), activity(ies). businessf es), commercial or other uses, any party I or parties who may occupy any portion of any improvements placed ow any land benefited by the easements established at paragraphs 1 or 2 above. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, no such monument, sign or billboard shall be placed or erected upon, or extend over or above, any improved roadway, driveways or pedestrian walkways now, or at any time hereafter, placed anywhere within, or which intersects or abuts, the boundaries of the Servient IPremises;nor shall any such monument,sign ar billboard be configured in such a way, or erected or placed in such location or manner, as may in any way materially interfere with, or obstruct,either: (a)free and convenient access I to any improvements located upon any tract or tracts of land benefited by the; easements established by paragraphs 1 or 2 above by means of any improvements made upon or to the Sentient Premises or by any other means; or lb) construction, reconstruction, installation, use or maintenance of any improved roadway, driveways, I pedestrian walkways, landscaping or other improvements or installations located upon, above or beneath the surface of land lying within the boundaries of the Sentient Premises other than monuments, signs or billboards placed thereon; or lc) the ability of persons intending to enter onto or to depart from the Servient Premises from I the public roadway which lies contiguous with the easternmost boundary thereof, to readily perceive and identify the entrance to the Sentient Premises from said roadway and safely enter into, or depart from, said entrance on or by means of said public roadway. I 4. Easements Appurtenant. The rights and easements descried and created hereunder shall endure in perpetuity and shall be and remain appurtenant to the Grantee's Premises above-described and to any additional or other premises,parcels or tracts of land hereafter acquired by the Grantor or the Grantee as aforesaid. 1 5_ Grants to Third Parties. Grantor expressly agrees that it will not, without the consent, joinder and agreement in writing of Grantee, voluntarily afford to any third party or parties, including, without limitation, the I grantee named in the Kinder-Care Agreement its successors in interest, transferees or assigns, and the grantee named in the Eshelman Agreement, his successors in interest,transferees and assigns, any rights or interests in or affecting the Sentient Premises or the easements and interests afforded the Grantee hereunder, it being I DECLARATION OF EASEMENT 3 Page 3 of 8 Pages t _09_99 06 : 36A P . 10 _• specifically acknowledged on the part of the Grantor that any such rights or interests afforded any such third party or parties will result in irreparable harm to Grantee and Grantee's Premises herein described. 6. Improvement, Maintenance and Repair of Servient Premises. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge ' that by means of the Kinder•Care Agreement and the Eshelman Agreement above•mentioned, each of the grantees thereunder and their respective successors in interest and assigns, became obligated for maintenance and repair of "...the shared drive..." subject of and described in each of said agreements '...so long as the lands to the west ' which are benefited by the shared drive contain no more than two single family residences." The Grantor and Grantee further acknowledge that said agreements and each of them further provide as follows: ' In the event the lands to the west are developed to increase the vehicular burden on the shared drive then from such time forward the cost of maintaining that portion of the shared drive constructed to the west of that point 120 feet to the west of S.W.HaU Boulevard shall be shared prorate(sic)to the amount of square footage of each parcel which has access to S.W.Hap Boulevard through said shared drive,. .. ' Accordingly, the Grantor and Grantee hereby undertake and agree that, as respects that portion of any shared driveway now existing upon the Servient Premises lying within 120 feet of the easterly boundary of S.W. Hall ' Boulevard and with respect to that portion of any surface improvements hereafter constructed or reconstructed upon the easterly 120 feet of the Servient Premises for the purpose of vehicular access and egress only which are used by or for the benefit of the grantees named in said agreements, their successors in interest or assigns, or any of said parties, the Grantor and the Grantee shall bear the cost to maintain and repair such shared driveway and surface improvements which it is not the obligation of the grantees under said agreements to bear as aforesaid, in accordance with the formula implicit in the terms of said agreements set forth above. As respects that portion of all and any other improvements, of whatever kind or nature which are now existing or hereafter constructed or reconstructed, placed or installed on, beneath or above the surface of the Servient ' Premises, including, but not limited to, surface improvements provided for the purposes of vehicular access and egress only, which do not benefit, and are not used in connection with, any use or improvements occurring on premises not owned by the Grantor or the Grantee, the Grantor and the Grantee, shall share in the costs to install and construct, and to repair and maintain, any and all such other improvements in shares reasonably and fairly proportionate to the benefit conferred by such improvements on their respective lands and the improvements now, and at anytime hereafter,constructed thereon. ' In establishing the reasonably and fairly proportionate shares of costs to be borne by the Grantor and the Grantee as stated above, the following factors shall be applied: a. Whether the subiect improvement in fact benefits the lands and improvements of the Grantor and the Grantee in the sense that such improvement is necessary in order for such lands and improvements to be used and occupied. If no such benefit is provided, no share of the costs entailed in installing and constructing and ' repairing and maintaining shall be borne by the owner of the lands and improvements not benefited. b. Whether the subject imurovement costs more to install or construct within or upon the Servient Premises because it benefits the lands andimorovements of both parties rather than the lands and improvements of one party exclusively_ If the subject improvement benefits the land and improvements of both the parties and it the casts to install or construct such improvement are not at least five percent (5%) greater than they would be if they benefited the lands and improvements of one party exclusively, then the costs to install or construct,and the costs to maintain and repair, such improvement shall be shared equally by the Grantor and Grantee. But if such costs are at least five percent 15%) greater because such improvements benefit the lands and improvements of both parties, then the cost to install or construct such improvement within or upon I DECLARATION OF EASEMENT Page 4 of 8 Pages Ir_0999 06: 36A P _ 11 the Servient Premises for the exclusive use and benefit of the Grantor's lands and the cost to install or construct such improvements within or upon the Servient Premises for the exclusive benefit of the lands and improvements of the Grantee shall be determined and combined (added) to form the denominator of a ' fractional share, the numerator of which, as respects each party,shall be the cost to install or construct such improvement within or upon the Servient Premises for the exclusive benefit of such party. Such fraction shall then be used to determine each party's share of the cost to install or construct such improvement within or ' upon the Servient Premises as well as each party's share of the future cost to maintain or repair such improvement. c. Whether ar not the necessity to maintain or repair an improvement within ar ma the Servient Premises is caused or contributed to by wrongful or negligent act or omission of the Grantor or the Grantee or of any .erson or 'arsons regardless of their tatus as an owner lessee tenant licensee invitee or tres•asser entering, leaving. coming on to using or occupying the lands or improvements of the Grantor or the Grantee ' other than the Servient Premises or some portion thereof, If maintenance or repair of an improvement within or upon the Servient Premises, or the Servient Premises themselves, is not caused by the wrongful or negligent act or omission of Grantor or Grantee or any person or persons entering,leaving, coming on to,using or occupying the lands or improvements of either the Grantor or Grantee as aforesaid, the costs of any such maintenance or repair shall be shared by the Grantor and the Grantee as described in the next preceding paragraph. Otherwise, such costs shall be borne in their entirety by the party whose wrongful or negligent acts or omissions caused or contributed to the need that such costs be incurred or by the party awning the lands or 'improvements subject of entering, leaving, coming on to, use or occupancy by such person or persons. d. Whether or not an improvement installed or constructed within or upon the Servient Premises requires maintenance or repair, replacement, reconstruction or upgrading due to changes in. or intensification of, uses ' gr activities cccurrine tt on,_or development, or improvements of.the lands of the Grantor or the Grantee. If, solely by reason of such changes or intensification, an improvement previously installed or constructed within or upon the Servient Premises must be maintained, repaired, replaced. reconstructed, upgraded, relocated or ' otherwise modified, al costs associated with maintenance, repair, replacement, reconstruction, upgrading, relocation or other modification, including any and all resulting costs and expenses incurred with respect to other improvements affected by such actions, are to be borne by the owner of lands upon which such changes ' or intensified uses or activities have occurred or will occur regardless of any incidental benefits which might in the future be conferred on other lands having potential access to such improvement. However, if any such maintenance, repair, replacement, reconstruction, upgrading, relocation or other modification results in any ' immediate and direct enhancement of services or in the kind, quality or quantity of services or utilities, actually available to. and used or consumed on, the lands of the other party, then the costs of future maintenance or repair of such improvement shall be borne equally between the Grantor and the Grantee, ' 7. Taxes on Servient Premises. If the Grantor, the Grantee, or both the Grantor and Grantee, shall become obligated as the owners of lands benefited by improvements installed, constructed or used within or upon the Servient Premises, for the payment of any taxes, excises or assessments levied based on the value of such improvements or upon the rights and interests afforded under this instrument, as distinguished from the unimproved value of The real property comprising the Servient Premises, then the Grantor and the Grantee shall ' each respectively assume, pay and satisfy such taxes, excises or assessments promptly and before any portion thereof shall become in arrears or past due. Grantor shall fully pay and satisfy any such taxes, excises or assessments levied based an the unimproved value of the real property comprising the Servient Premises all as hereinafter prescribed: DECLARATION OF EASEMENT Page S of 8 Pages I099 06: 37A P. 12 • • a. On or before the 31st day of December each year commencing with the year 1997, Grantor shall deliver to Grantee, and Grantee shall deliver to Grantor, at their respective addresses appearing an the real property tax rolls of Washington County, Oregon, a statement in writing setting forth the amount which the party ' delivering said statement contends such party has incurred in the way of liability for the payment of taxes, excises andlor assessments levied on or with respect to said improvements, rights and interests as aforesaid during the fiscal tax year beginning on the first day of July of such year. b. Not later than the 15th day of February of the year following the date upon which statements are to be delivered as aforesaid. each party shall deliver to the other party at the address of the other party mentioned above, a second statement setting forth the amount, if any, which the party delivering such statement claims the party to whom such statement is delivered is obligated to pay to, or reimburse, the party delivering such statement, on account of the total amount of taxes, excises andlor assessments levied on, or with respect to, said improvements, rights and interests previously paid or thereafter payable, by the party delivering such ' statement and claim. c. Said obligations shall be determined each year in accordance with the same factors based upon which both parties' respective shares of the costs of maintenance and repair of all improvements installed within or upon the Servient Premises would otherwise be determined on the first day of the fiscal tax year subject of such statements in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this instrument. d. If, according to the second statements exchanged by the Grantor and the Grantee as aforesaid, the net difference between the amounts, if any, each party claims the other is obligated to pay or reimburse it on account of all taxes, excises and assessments subject of such party's second statement, does not exceed the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) neither party shall be obliged to pay or reimburse the other any amount whatsoever on account of such taxes, excises andlor assessments. Otherwise, the net difference between the two amounts claimed, to the extent the same exceeds the sum of one thousand dollars, shall be ' paid by the party which advanced the lesser claim to the party which advanced the greater claim, or the parties shall undertake to compromise their differences,within thirty (30)days following the date both second statements shall have been delivered as aforesaid and, failing such compromise, the matter shall be submitted ' to binding arbitration as hereinafter described. e. In the event either the Grantor or the Grantee shall fail, neglect or refuse, for any reason whatsoever, to ' deliver to the other either the first or second statement at the time and in the manner above stated, then the party who delivered such statements and each of them as aforesaid shall be entitled to recover from the other party whatever amount the party delivering such statements contends, in such party's second statement, the ' other party is obliged to pay or reimburse the party who delivered such statements and such contention shall be deemed final,conclusive and binding on both parties for all purposes whatsoever. 8. Duty to Insure: Indemnification. At all times,the Grantor and the Grantee shall each and severally procure and maintain at their sole cost and expense, one or more policies or contracts of insurance providing coverage and indemnity,in an insured amount of not less that $1,000,000.00,for and against losses and damages claimed by or on behalf of the other party, and by third parties, including, without limitation, damages far loss, damage and ' depreciation of personal property, bodily injury and loss of life, arising out of the use or condition of the Servient Premises and all improvements now, or at anytime hereafter, placed, located, installed, constructed or used thereon and for any such claims arising out of the any insurable activities conducted thereon by any third party or ' parties employed by or on behalf of the Grantor or the Grantee for the purposes of installing, constructing, maintaining or repairing any and all such improvements. At all times, the Grantor and the Grantee shall each and severally keep and maintain at their own expense their respective interests in the Servient Premises insured DECLARATION OF EASEMENT 4 Page 6 of 8 Pages -OS-99 06: 38A P. 13 • ! against fire and such other risks and casualties as they may respectively, and from time-to-time, each and independently determine to insure. Provided, however, that the Grantor and the Grantee do hereby expressly agree one with the other, that they will fully indenrnify and save harmless the other from, for and against all and any losses, liabilities, claims, damages and expenses, including without limitation costs of defense and attorneys' fees, which the other may at anytime suffer or incur which are caused, to the extent the same are contributed to, by the wrongful or negligent acts or omissions of their respective employees, agents, representatives, tenants. ' invitees, licensees, permittees, contractors, and subcontractors andior by any casualty or occurrence for which such party might have obtained insurance commonly available at reasonable cost in relation to the magnitude of the risks insured, by reason of their respective interests in, and contractual undertakings with respect to, the Servient Premises herein described or established. 9. Arbitration. if any dispute arises between the Grantor and the Grantee hereunder, the same shall be submitted to arbitration for final and binding determination. Either the Grantor or the Grantee may request ' arbitration of any such dispute and appoint one individual to act in the capacity of an arbitrator. Upon receipt of any such request for arbitration, the other party may appoint one individual to act in the capacity of an arbitrator and the two arbitrators so appointed shall appoint a third arbitrator. If the appointment of either the second or third arbitrator is not made within ten (10) days of appointment of the arbitrator previously appointed,then either the Grantor or the Grantee may apply to the presiding judge of Washington County, Oregon, to appoint the required arbitrator. The arbitrators so appointed shall proceed according to the Oregon statutes governing arbitration (currently contained in Chapter 36, Oregon Revised Statutes), and the award of the.arbitrators shall have the effect therein provided. Said arbitration shall take place in Washington County, Oregon. The casts of the arbitration shall be shared equally by the parties, but each party shall pay its own attorney fees incurred in connection therewith unless otherwise determined by the award on arbitration. In the conduct of any such arbitration, each party shall have the right to conduct discovery by all and any means available to parties engaged in civil litigation then pending in the U.S. District Court for Oregon, sitting at Portland. 10. Parties Bound. This instrument and the terms and provisions herein contained shall hind, and inure to the benefit of the Grantor, the Grantee and the successors in interest, heirs, personal representatives„transferees and 1 assigns of the Grantor and the Grantee. 11. Effects of Conflicts With Other Agreements. Insofar as the terms of this instrument may now, or at any ' time hereafter, be deemed or construed to conflict with the terms or provisions of any other and prior agreement or instrument purporting to fix, describe, create or establish rights and interests in the Servient Premises or any portion thereof to which the Grantor or the Grantee, or their predecessors in interest. may be parties, then to the ' extent possible in conformity with applicable legal and equitable principles and precedent this instrument and the terms and provisions herein contained shall be afforded precedence, replace and supersede such conflicting terms and provisions of said prior agreement or instrument and the same shall be null, void and of no further effect I whatsoever. 12. Remoteness of Vesting; Severability. if, and in the event, any rights, interests or claims arising, or which might arise, under or which are described in, or created by, this instrument shall be deemed or construed by any ' court or tribunal having lawful jurisdiction to do so, to conflict with, ar rendered unenforceable, unrecognizable or void by reason of, any rule of law or equity pertaining to remoteness of vesting, then such terms or provisions shall be deemed and construed enforceable and valid for so long, and to such extent, as such rule of law shall permit, and no longer or further. If any terms or provisions of this instrument shall be found invalid or unenforceable to any extent by judgment or decree of any court or tribunal having lawful jurisdiction to do so, the DECLARATION OF EASEMENT 7 Page 7 of 8 Pages 4_09-99 06: 38A P_ 14 validity and enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions shall . .t be affected and the same shall be construed to effect the evident intent of the parties insofar as reaso, :b i ssible. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor and the Grantee have heron , 1 ',,n- I ective as of the latest date set forth below. + i I RAMA an Oregon Ali. ∎4 BRAHMAPRENIANANOARSH 9 - nan-profit corporation, G for M"AEL J.'ELIS• Grantee BY I Swami Viswa Premananda,President • , By--,� . ' ► \ I Bharat Naik,Secretary i • State of Oregon,County of Ca ) s.s. . This instrument was acknowledged before me o - Z , I 1997, by SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA as President of Brahmapremananda Ashrama, an Ore n non-profit corporation. �' r.�.,r • OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Public for Oregon NOTARY YnR PUBLIC..OREGON My Commission Expires i' 12..OW (MISSION .06+335 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 05.2000 1 State of Oregon.County of I_ _ ._ A ' ) s.s. This instrument was acknowledged before me on _Co- , 1997,by Bharat Naik as Secretary of Rrahmapremananda Ashrams,an Oregon •on-profit corporation. -/A1V • It Sa OFFICIAL..SEAL Notary Public for Oregon l '—A enoo tuu�uN My Commission Expires lQ Mini- NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.064615 i I I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 03,2000 • State of Oregon.County of 1^1L iArttA) } s.s. 1 T •. • .�1,�L 1.x.1 .1 L i.. (2)—N1 This instrument as a• no l ugC afore ti c :+u 1997, by Michael J.Nedelisky. 1111kaet %Slit OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Public for Oregon i = ROBIN L � My Commission Expires Q(� ,��-' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON y p q,��. `1 1 �" : COMMISSION NO.047466 ; MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 27,1 39 I - I DECLARATION OF EASEMENT 4g Page 8 of 8 Pages ilr-OS-99 06: 39A P _ 15 "EXHIBIT A" TO DECLARATION CF EASEMENT Brahmapremananda Ashrama. Grantor; ' Michael J. Nedelisky, Grantee; [Description of Servient Premises] R BEING A PORTION OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DECRIBED AS PARCELS I, II AND III IN DEED RECORDED JANUARY 5, 1995, AS FEE NO. 95001169, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY. OREGON, SITUATED IN THE ' SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY AND STATE OF OREGON, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY ' DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 53; THENCE NORTH 2°03'00' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 10, 1995, FEE NO. 95055808, DEED RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. AND THE "POINT OF BEGINNING';THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCELS II AND III IN SAID DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95001169 SOUTH 2°03'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 110.23 FEET TO THE NORTH UNE OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCEL I IN SAID DEED; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH UNE SOUTH 89°03'05" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 287.47 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SOUTHWEST HALL BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD NO. 947);THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH O°56'55" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3207 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL I; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89°51'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 338.23 FEET;THENCE ON A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 50.00 FEET DISTANT TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCELS 11 AND III NORTH 2°03'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 148.07 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE SOUTH 89°57'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE 'POINT OF BEGINNING'. CONTAINING 17,180 FEET MORE OR LESS. 1 1 I EXHIBIT A DECLARATION OF EASEMENT 9 Page 1 of 1 Pages I 1r-09-99 06: 39A P . 16 1 "EXHIBIT B" ITO DECLARATION OF EASEMENT Brahmapremananda Ashrama. Grantor; ' Michael J. Nedelisky, Grantee; [Description of Grantee's Premises] ' RECORDED AUGUST 10.1995 AS FEE NO'S 95055810 AND A TRACT COMPRISED OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS E 95055812 ANO PART OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.95055808,RECORDS OF WASHINGTON ' COUNTY, OREGON, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35. TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY IN THE STATE OF OREGON BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 53; THENCE NORTH 2°03'00' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN I DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808 AND THE 'POINT OF BEGINNING';THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NORTH 87°57'01' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET;THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 2°03'00" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 37.38 FEET;THENCE NORTH 49°06'23"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 91.68 FEET TO THE NORTH UNE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH UNE NORTH 87°58'19'WEST, A DISTANCE OF 107.57 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID TRACTS RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055810 AND 95055812 NORTH 02°5713" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 283.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO.217:THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF. WAY LINE ON A 11,319.16 FOOT RADIUS NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST (CHORD BEARS SOUTH 49°34'48"EAST,-420.66 FEET)A DISTANCE OF 420.69 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.95055812 SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTH UNE OF LOT 19, BLOCK "0'. "METZGER ACRE TRACTS", THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE NORTH 89°03'05' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.32 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055810; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808 SOUTH 2°03100'WEST,A DISTANCE OF 115.07 FEET TO THE-POINT OF BEGINNING". 1 CONTAINING 58.133 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. • 1 1.. EXHIBIT B DECLARATION OF EASEMENT / O Page 1 of 1 Pages 1 I .. . , . IThis Agreement is made this 7-4 day of November, 1997 between Kichael J. Nedelisky ("Nedelisky") and Brahma Premananda Ashrama, an Oregon non-profit corporation ("Ashrama") . 1 7BCITAL8 I A. Nedelisky owns the real property described on the attached Exhibit A. B. Ashrama owns the real property described on the attached Exhibit B. Ashrama's property is adjacent to and south of Nedelisky's property. C. Nedelisky and Ashrama have made prior agreements allowing shared parking between Nedelisky's property and Ashrama's property, under certain conditions. Nedelisky and ;Ashram have also made certain agreements relating to utilities, access, and maintenance of Ithe access to their properties. D. Nedelisky wishes to develop Nedelisky's property now. ' Ashrama does not intend to develop Ashrama's property until after Nedelisky's property is developed. E. Nedelisky wishes to construct some parking spaces partly on. Ashrama's property. This would increase the amount of parking immediately available to Nedelisky's property. Ashrama is willing to grant permission to Nedelisky to build these parking spaces on Ashrama's Property, on the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, Nedelisky and Ashrama agree as follows: ' 1. The recitals above are true and correct and are a part of this Agreement. 2 . Ashrama grants to Nedelisky the ght to construct paved parking spaces in the portion of Ashrama's property cross-hatched on the attached Exhibit C. This portion includes an area already subject to an access easement in favor of Nedelisky and another area not so subject. 3 . Nedelisky will construct the parking spaces entirely at Nedelisky•s expense and without a right to contribution from Ashrama, notwithstanding any other agreement between Nedelisky and Ashrama. The parties will, however, $hare the maintenance cost of these parking spaces in accordance with-€it prior agreements. ' 4. Nedelisky will also construct, entirely at Nedelisky's expense, the access driveway from S.W. Hall Boulevard to Nedelisky's property, across and through the easement area on Ashrama's property 1 - AGREEMENT t JI_1Prl.:5-17:9 I , •61 II 1 t s is Xede14.AN 'a__proPerty and a paved parking area sufficient for parking o no ess an-12 automobiles north and east of the "Existing House" shown on Exhibit C. , immediately south of the IIeasement area. Nedelisky and Ashrama will share maintenance of the access easement in accordance with their pr or agreements. When Nedelisky improves the access easement, Nedelisky will Is.also construct sever, water and natural gas service lines to serve Nedelisky's property. For those utilities that are underneath the access easement and for which Ashrama notifies Nedelisky of Ashrama's I requirements for service capacity within (oQ da s after the date of this Agreement, Xedelisky will bu r underground service lines with a capacity sufficient to serve both Nedelisky's property when I developed and Ashrama's property when developed. Nedelisky will install taps for plugs for the underground utilities where the access easement turns from an East West direction to a North South direction so that Ashrama's property can connect to those plugs when Ashrama's 1 property is developed. Nedelisky will pay for the labor and materials to do this. Nedelisky will pay the charges for permits re sd to construct a service lines mentioned above not including I an cc tea; edated Awith omits, connection, meter fees or lEe like . ncurred or charged on accoun 'ot installation or connection of any service lines which may now or hereafter be connected to such service lines to serve the Ashrama's property. Ashrrasa w y, as and when I due all and any tap-in, permit, connection, or meter fees and other costs charged against or on account of service to Ashrama's property and/or the potential or eventual installation and connection of service lines serving Ashrama's property other than service lines in the easement area that will also serve Nedelisky's property. 6. This Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts or with multiple signature pages, or with signature pages sent by r facsimile. Each such signature page shall be considered an original, but together the documents form one Agreement. 7 . Any dispute involving this Agreement shall be settled by I binding arbitration with a single arbitrator chosen by agreement of the parties, or if they cannot agree on a single arbitrator, then under the rules of Arbitration Service of Portland, Inc. Except that I the shall be • more than one arbitrator_ BRAHMA PR MANANDA ASHRAMA • 41; • ► ^ i eel J. N By: ,President......-._ 1 - ir 1 By. Bharat Naik, Secretary 2 - AGREEKENT DiAlool,441a.sgr 1 1 JUN-13-15`_ • 1 1 1 r . I 1 A TRACT COMPRISED OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS RECORDED AUGUST 10.1995 AS FEE ND'S 95055810 AND 950! ' PART OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST.WILLAMETTE MERIDI: CITY OF TIGARD,WASHINGTON COUNTY IN THE STATE OF OREGON BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLIC COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 53; THEN; ronr EAST,A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED REC ' FEE NO_95055808 AND THE"POINT OF BEGINNING-;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID TRACT NORTH 87°57". A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 2°03'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37.38 FEE- . NORTH 49°O6'23' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 91.68 FEET TO THE NORTH UNE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED REC' FEE ND, 95055808: THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 87•58'19' WEST. A DISTANCE OF 107.57 FEET NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACTS RECORDED AS FEE NO. 9505: 95055312 NORTH 02°57'13' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 283.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF STATE NO. 217; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE ON A 11,319.16 FOOT RADIUS NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAV: SOUTHWEST {CHORD BEARS SOUTH 49°34'48' EAST, - 420.66 FEETI A DISTANCE OF 420.69 FEET TO A INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055812 SAID L ' BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 19,BLUCX "0".'METZGER ACRE TRACTS'.THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 8. WEST,A DISTANCE OF 105.32 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.SE . THENCE ALONG SAID EAST UNE AND THE EAST UNE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 5 ' SOUTH 2'03'00"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 17 5.07 FEET TO THE'POINT OF BEGINNING', [Contains 58,133 square teat.mare ar less) • • • • 1 3iBiT -- PAGE OF • r I . • 1 _ ._ ILTRACT COMPRISED OF LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCELS I, II AND III IN DEED RECORDED JANUARY 5, 1995, AS FEE NO. 85001169, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, "TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, AEGUN, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 10, 1995, AS FEE NO.95055803,RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY,ORECt0N,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: kOMMINCING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 53; THENCE AT ORTIl 2°03'OO"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED ECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NORTH 87°57'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE-POINT OF BEGINNING";THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 2°03130" EAST, A 'DISTANCE OF 37.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49°06'23"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 91.68 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 'TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 87°58'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 107.57 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF A10 TRACT SOUTH 2°5713" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 94.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; HENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT SOUTH 87°5701" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 180.47 FEET TO THE"POINT F BEGINNING'. Contains 90,067 square feet,more or less) I . • 1 1 1 I . E inn PAGE OF . . cn a 0 =I IIIIIII MI • — — ® — — — = — — — — — — — r MI NS MN NM EN EN NM MI NM UM NM NM MB MIN 0111 • 1TJp v( 1 / 1A ,/ S . 0 Iyt r7 1.Y - r A \ �9, • METZGER R Ii r NT m iIt� 11t�.a A �+ N. 1 T/ sN, MI 1 O i M -_• ' ROLE L •CI -N \\*.N • L9, 11 ' • nR® Co{ n. Ifl.. e loll. I COSTING LEWIS a ,D• . STRUCTURE L m DECIDUOU • E p 1 E .Q VAN VLEET R �� twos nwm MI MOO R. III �t..aht-.�W Mil SCR v•as Am mown�1� (9nan ` D.I::: UM _U!` a mn w ` '. : IIIII : rdI■IN�m�Cyy *AGEFI -ommu ■■e• ♦ 1� OW•t t p9 1 Q ■■• �. N '00.00.E 287.79• 1 TCj• 1'7 Mlle PROPOSED Y"T.. Q EA2 p3001167 A` Q, _. -II SUPPER LE FF 270.0 i �'�s _ O►LOWER LE FF 217.0{0 111111r1111,�■■■ ••0 1 L -- ■ ` N89'71'11�E 289.85•,■■ _n DOST01G ENTRANCE.ums■ ■ WO IONDER-CARE= -■ NM MMMM MI■■■■■■■ S. ■ ERNES/AY 0 aIIIIIIIIIII ■ �,�: EASEMENT ■ o '4�Q,_� : SUMMARY ow am W g �▪ lv UM.tam O®il.�mm� � �__ 0 t4 ......2•1[.......M 10 t00 ''''" 1".72.,... ' Q O ■ o EOSRNG II "' F'F STRUCTURE t I �` RT�C�roP�" r ,Z�//�� ■ PROPOSED ASH a. \\\ �_� Z FF 219* (MATCH N89 1�_E m• m taa-p. \- e Q IF t.nmae we®w:u"as �� L• W a e _ o o ' "0"�"'a"'� VICINITY MAP O. 3• • 58857.12E 7\a 7A' W KEYNOTES: W n ~ NSITE PUN 0 astaa.a r m®n.am a a .ammo ao I---- V) ,,I .-y ©smu...e.n..m • O ma�OD O.a omen .�t�.t®O I s Mal eaal 'a°a • mama C 0 OUTDATED MATERIAL (NOT APPROVED-SEE REVISED SET) January 12, 2001 Ms. Karen Fox City of Tigard Planning 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT— CASE NUMBER CUP1999-00001/PDR1999-00002/VAR1999-00024/MIS1999-00026 Attached please find the followings: • Attachment A discussing modifications on the project, • Response letter from the project civil engineer on conditions of approval, • Revised civil drawings (CO through C4), • Architectural drawings for the new temple structure (A01-A06), • Parametric view of the new temple, and • Bifiltration swale maintenance plan. In our opinion, proposed modifications are minor, thus, not requiring any additional approval (please see Attachment A). We are hoping that the city officials will come to the same conclusion and expedite the process. KINDLY CALL US AT 503-646-9069 IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS SO THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CAN BE MADE AVAILABLE IMMEDIATELY TO THE REVIEW OFFICIAL. Sincerely, S ettiwar, MS, PE Project Engineer fpg)WHOcc3 ATTACHMENT A RESPONSE - MODIFICATIONS ON THE PROJECT a. A change in land use; Response—Land use change has not occurred. b. An 10% increase in dwelling unit density; Response—No change has occurred in the dwelling unit density. c. A change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas where off- site traffic would be affected; Response—Entrance at the Hall Blvd intersection has been widened as noted on the site plan, thus making the situation better. Previously proposed parking spaces have been eliminated except the handicapped parking spaces (two), which remain the same. In addition, the adjacent neighbor(owner of Hall Park Office bldg) has built several parking spaces on adjacent property to the northeast. Thus, in fact, parking situation has improved considerably since the previous application. d. An increase in the floor area proposed for non-residential use by more than 10% where previously specified; Response—No increase has occurred by more than 10% e. A reduction of more than 10% of the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space; Response—No decrease has occurred by more than 10% f. A reduction of specified setback requirements by more than 20%; Response— Setbacks have not changed. A correction was made to the front setback as requested in the conditions of approval. g. An elimination of project amenities by more than 10%where previously specified provided such as: (1) Recreational facilities; (2) Screening; or (3) Landscaping provisions; and Response—None of the above stated has occurred. h. A 10% increase in the approved density; Response—This has not changed. BIOFILTRATION SWALES 4.2.3 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN Project Name: LE /M67ZAH Abbl-ri 0 City File Number: Engineer: K:M t1C Y1 JLi-AsJ Engineering Firm: IS Vim ULE The responsible organization shall perform the following tasks to maintain the surface water quality facilities on the above project: The purpose of vegetated swale maintenance is to keep the vegetated cover dense and vigorous. It is also important to maintain the swale to keep the flow of water even across the width of the swale. • Mow the grass in the swale periodically to maintain an aesthetic appearance, to restrict the growth of undesirable vegetation, and to keep the cover of grass dense and vigorous. • Re-plant areas of poor grass growth and bare spots with an appropriate grass mixture. • Water the grass regularly during the establishment period and as needed in dry weather to maintain vigorous growth. • Remove debris and litter regularly to keep the facility free of leaves, rocks, and other debris. • Remove sediment deposited in the swale during storm events and rake smooth to grade. • Maintain the swale bottom to be smooth with a uniform longitudinal slope to minimize flow channelization. • Inspect the swale at least three times a year. • Inform local residents of the purpose of the facility and the importance of keeping it swale free of grass clippings, yard debris, oil, grease, or other inappropriate materials. Responsible Organization: g CI 12-'1'001 kel. hJ4 q A-011- Contact Person: S�t,�„ a 0 Phone Numbers: ccr3 G 4 Q.-9 0 • Chapter 4 -- Page 6 L.EWVS li VAN VLEET Incorporated principals chris c.van vleet. p.e. gary j. lewis. p.e. January 10, 2001 Brian Rager Engineering Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Swami Viswa Premananda Temple Addition CUP 1999-00001/PDR1999-00002/VAR1999-00024/1VIIS 1999-00026 Planning Commission Final Order No. 99-03PC This letter is in response to the Planning and Engineering Conditions of Approval. All items have been addressed as follows. Planning Conditions: 1. A detail of the bicycle rack has been added to sheet C 4. 2. The site plan has been revised to show (9) additional bicycle parking spaces provided. 3. The site plan has been revised to show a clearly marked walkway across the access drive/parking lot connecting the existing sidewalk and the proposed sidewalk. 4. The revised site plan has a note stating that the existing access drive has been widened to 40' by the adjacent property owner of the Hall Park Office Building. The revised site plan also shows one of the handicap parking spaces being van accessible which includes a 9-foot-wide space with and 8-foot-wide aisle. 5. The site plan summary notes the size of the dedicated living facilities (guestrooms and resident's rooms). This area is less than 3,460 square feet. 6. Site lighting has been shown and noted on the Site Plan. 7. A note has been added on the Site Plan stating that "Hours of operation shall be limited to prohibit worship services from being held before 6:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays with the exception of legal holidays." 8. The revised site plan clearly states the site size, the amount of impervious surface and the amount of landscaped area on the subject site alone. 9. The revised site plan shows the setback dimensions for the proposed additions. consulting engineers 18660 s.w. boones ferry road tualatin. oregon 97062 (503) 885.8605 phone [503) 1385.1205 fax Engineering Conditions: 10. Addressed by applicant. 11. Addressed by applicant. 12. An on-site water detention facility is not required. Refer to the previous study done by VLMK Engineers. 13. An on-site water quality facility is provided as required by Unified Sewerage Agency and the City of Tigard. A proposed maintenance plan is being submitted along with this Resubmittal of plans and calculations for review and approval. 14. Addressed by applicant. If you have any questions regarding our response to your review comments, please feel free to call me at(503) 885-8605. Sincerely, Bryan Dickerson, EIT Cc: Sam Adettiwar, Geo Standards •LEW,IS & VAN VLEET Incorporated • principals Chris c.van.peat. p.e. C garyj. !ems. p.e. IVIL CALCULATIONS FOR Temple / Ashram 11515 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon FOR Geo Standards c.w) ?;^:G,4'r �k \\........ , 1 :.3 29 ••4 az, • EXPIRESI2/31/2002 Lewis & Van Vleet, Inc. Job Number 98122 consulting engineers 18660 s.w. boones ferry road tualatin. oregon 97062 (503] 885.8605 phone (503] 885.120 6 fax LEWIS •& • Eonsulting engineers Job'r�1t^'� �A� ,�-t L Client C' O Slim b/t-�laS 18660 s.w. boones ferry road tualatin. oregon 97062 [503)13E15.8605 phone (503)885.1206 fax Job No. q c6 I ZZ By Z.St) VAN VLEET Date \0 - \IS-0 O Sheet No. Incorporated ' =I 1 l mac_ vJPefr-z- C/ W..i O uS , 4 • peTwrzo...) - Nor 1ZEQu r 2EL; ( .s- ,u r -i 7.2 h b 73 y Val<6U6Itiec-�2 s f W r u M t Ty- 'eowdc 3io-S -c �E Z U sR S7��A �S 1 A fl 4 NE') I1'tFeevicIJ.S 1E? = 1(o,ZSo 5F (©^31 3 ac.- ifi I gOvATE CAJrizc Sm.::P-r' :.Ayr-7;z_ ?--U.VO F FU2 /0 `OZ. 5-rop-0-1 77-fi2at/ t=+ S-t)A[„E '� . � ? O tl Qto= ,-3�I' CFS (5�� f��r vrou-r 1> I G s 310-SwMrL Cr --Z►A . L- loci'r, I'IkuvruG _ n. O.7-4v i 1 (? ustA Sct't ictr...C:c1 5, 0,005o% n,,V S'Ce Sao? 4: 1 s ii r Vr Z,O FPS 1.1/}22( i 0= C:. Fr 11ItX C,c,rN,"''lJ•L ! Z.O rt r�V 1 ./ I 1 I y Fog Q = o ,34cFs : V_ ©.ZO FPS (SEE i2,rv7DUr 2- r '1 F D= a,41 5 Fr 7. I 3 L \0$ Fr I r 1 • Pipc S izC C.tuc.4.c_A-T-ro1)5 i. Cokt_c.ui NEED t&s 1 NU -NC 'Zit-n or l kt rle rm-o i Foil R (O-'It Srolz.s-1 i U.s t Lxa mcr, z,.,.* 7 RA,, l -Adsrne5 . E A rncci& siv $ t 1{l r 1 i i a .4.4 tc3 ve C� fie. ',no ter 1 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 . 21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C.S . TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C.S . TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10, 24, 3 . 45 ******************** S .C.S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 . 45" TOTAL PRECIP . ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, . 373, 98, 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN . 4 . 0 90 . 0 . 4 98 . 0 5 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK (HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 34 7 . 67 4355 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: TEMPLE Q10 Tel krw A-r Z+ • TEMPLE/ASHRAM WATER QUALITY SWALE Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File c:\winnt\profiles\bryan\desktop\00storm.fm2 Worksheet SWALES Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.240 Channel Slope 0.005.000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 4.000000 H :V Right Side Slope 4.000000 H :V Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 0.34 cfs Results —40 Depth 0.45 ft Flow Area 1.73 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 5.74 ft Top Width 5.63 ft Critical Depth 0.09 ft Critical Slope 1.981159 ft/ft ■•• Velocity 0.20 ft/s Velocity Head 0.6e-3 ft Specific Energy 0.45 ft Froude Number 0.06 • Flow is subcritical. 0.45 ft .a 1 2.00 ft V H 4.0 NTS 10/18/00 FlowMaster v5.15 09:02:19 AM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 PIPE SIZE CALCULATIONS Project No._ 98.122 _ Designed by: BSD Date: 01/10/01 Checked by: KSM _ Date: Project Name: MP TELE/ASHRAM Page: 1 of 1 DESIGN SECTION DESIGN CALCULATIONS DESIGN INVERT ELEVATIONS INCR. TOTAL INTEN- INC R. RUNOFF EQUIV. TOTAL CAPA- MH to MH TIME TIME SITY AREA COEFF. INCR. EQUIV. RUNOFF SLOPE DIA. CITY VELOC. LENGTH UPPER LOWER OR AREA AREA ST to ST T Tt I A C CA ECA Q S d Qf Vf L minutes minutes in./hr. acres coeff. acres acres cfs % inches cfs fps feet TEMPLE RD- FD 5.0 5.0 2.10 0.054 0.9 0.049 0.049 0.10 9.06% 4 0.83 9.49 129 227.00 215.35 FD-J1 0.2 5.2 2.08 0.001 0.9 0.001 0.050 0.10 0.50% 4 0.19 2.23 72 215.35 214.99 AD1 -AD2 5.0 5.0 2.10 0.057 0.9 0.051 0.051 0.11 0.50% 4 0.19 2.23 55 215.50 215.23 AD2-J1 0.4 5.4 2.05 0.057 0.9 0.051 0.103 0.21 0.50% 4 0.19 2.23 50 215.23 214.98 J1 -J2 0.4 5.8 2.00 - - - 0.152 0.30 0.50% 6 0.57 2.92 62 214.89 214.58 ASHRAM RD-CB 5.0 5.0 2.10 0.063 0.9 0.057 0.057 0.12 1.00% 4 0.27 3.15 80 217.00 216.20 CB -J2 0.4 5.4 2.08 0.070 0.9 0.063 0.120 0.25 1.00% 4 0.27 3.15 84 216.20 215.36 J2-SWALE 0.4 6.1 1.97 - - - 0.272 0.54 0.50% 6 0.57 2.92 36 214.58 214.40 SWALE- EXIST MH - - - - - - - 0.54 4.00% 6 1.62 8.26 62 213.50 211.00 NOTE: PIPE SIZES ARE CALCULATED USING THE RATIONAL METHOD FOR A 10 YEAR STORM USING ODOT, ZONE 7 RAINFALL INTENSITIES. ... .. . - ., I ••1 o, ral .. .Ina .p remanand _temple Li gar ri.., (..a •••!.. 1.:'Tv 2......)„3 I :Tile:Dimes . •• • ::::::::::':::::::•::.:.: :::- ...-:::•••• ._ . .. .......• :•.7.:::':::•': .:':::::::::.....• ::•.::::.•• - • .::::• . •••••••••••••••••:••:;:•••:••• :.:::...:.:.:.... .:..:.: :::::•::::•:.:::::::::::::':::ii: :::.:::::•:•.:.:::•..:.:.:::::: • :.:::::::::...:.....:" ,..... ... .‘• .....,: .-.,•. • blitiii,,,....1:1•1•': " e•• •... • . .. . i •• ....," , '"•• 1:•,••.•••.:•.•••••••'•• .• •• • .•••'• i ... . i • . .. . .• . i . i.. ••. • • .• . . At i ■.. .• . ... .' . . . •. . •. •• • • .. • :" • . .. i • .••••,::•••.••::••••••••••••••f....7.•••• •••• •• .• Ell ......-- .. . ...• . ........ . ..• •. . . , . •• . • ••4•••:•.•i•• .• •••4;•'• • . .• ••• . ., • • •• •• • ••1•,••••••7,••...' • n•1,.....••' • • •'...e 4.;..• .t.,...•••••• . .• 41■.••■•••■ '•••• . : • •.. ...::.:..:.:...::::;:,.: .:i.A :::.•:•:•::.. .• ••...:. ..::...,:.'::91511ifirlii:W.4rnin••Prr?, '.....,•,. • . . . ••••...: 41 1•••••••••••:....'iiiii:i:••••-•:,.. ... . •••."". ...•• ••• °Ilgr.tiiiiir.11::::::!!.:1••.:••••••••••••.1:1•Zliii.,••'' •••••• ••••- •A...i.,:::;:;::00.001:1::::M:::•::-. .,..... :1:::M•:!::::..'........ •'"•••4'n• ••.11:•1; ••• fig..UP ..... :11.1...................751 1.i......•••••••••7............................ :::i3:::::::i.::lf. •••••••• A."....• . ••••• •:.••••••. 1:::::::: .•:dir ................. .• ......: • •••• . • ••••• .. ....: . .. .... ....• • ••. . : . ................... ••....•..• • ..... ..... . . . . . .:. ..."*.--- ::: ...mow! Ak.,:.::.::: tt, • ....•... • • • --•••"". •• ...... ...... ........:•:•••:: ,.. .•::::::::.,.::::. ..., •.•:•... :• .. .... •••••• ::: •••.. ••••••••• ................... ............. .V.,::. ....••••••••:•....: :.. --:: .. :. .•..::• • : : . .. ..... . _. _. .• . • • • .....,......:. .:....: • ,.. .•.• • *1:1:14; ..... .....,.. ...1". ,,:.1.'AA:,/..:• ...1.; trr . •. . • . nA11.:"•:::".."....:: ....f :::::!..,.........t.. ':" ....‘'•••1"."712', •,,ii ........; .1..•: -1.:E..4i :'-- ••••• .-: • • - • • • • - •••• •••• • •••• •--• •• ..... •• • .. r-* . . .vv v.'"P"Fr.. , 1,..yri ..,_ . :. i.,.... , . .7.,,h fo: ,-4'. •-• -.: ......:-.:4,-... 44, r....,.. ...- • . ..... .... „ •••• . . . ...... . . ...... : • . • I • ...... • .. .... • kiaimpliffltitli •,,,,huil ,...-;•-,-.4,15‹,-.:.Oro ,;... r:::. .,.-. ..... • • .,,.1/4..1/4... .„.. ...„• „••• „••• .,.• .0.. ,..„.4,..„:44,..„:„..,..4.:,.,,L,„..,,...k„.,-;,..,Ruale • . •• . .... = INSTOWSW•••••••••••"*M7/".•••••••••^, /161VIONON•-• I MINI M11111111111111■111 ' .......-•rii.,_........."' 1", ',,... *1'1' • •• • . . ..... ..„_,..........,......-iiviirs. ....... .' . ....... •• . •• ' 11141•114,•111t'''0,\ • 1 . •.• ••••••• :........--;r.,; ',..■•• ... .. ... . . •••••••••••••••••• i•• • • •• ••.•.. . : n . •...... "• .. . •• .. . • • ••••••••• •••••.• •• •-•••. •• •••••• ... •,.. • .. . . '.k: .... •-• • .....•• ....... • • • . ••...•• .. •••- - •- ••-•.!••.>. •-••••4ki: . ,..-,,I., . ft1.--.....• ...... .. ...., -i,>a.;, •,• . ...,1';'..11,1**.• .2.**-1•C:.'.1'*11 ... 11.....:.<4•''''.**: • ....1.'•••'''• ..........—_-....--„ • ...,-..• •.. .4,,,„''''...!1'..... . ••'•i• •41ti)., .... '' •''''...?,'l'•• *. ..: , 1;......iii,...4.;.....• !..ilowtvii;c7:21U. . • ''••••'W.';`• ..,•.....5..?..ai!,',...i.:::....„,...... • • """'" '.' ' .''.''''.:',"0 .• •!'11•N,1.•• ..• •• •/47.1.t.44g.....::•■*••: i.:•:.;•'••• ••4•,....r......,............:......;::::ai.......i.„..........; . 11 "';-. •*-- ........., ..: .:" ............... ...........,; . „"..•,........',I1,1:1;::•n!'4.:;•••4':::102,-;;;A7. .4 a N.• .... :::.••••••:...., „7.f,.,,,,.-,. ..,...,,,..:..,.,...:::•:: ..g.,.:.4.:;.•":...: 1:,:,<::::::4..:.....:1..!....4.:■.i.:,..'..'......i.:1,.....-..::!........-:;,4.-;::: ...,:.:: .::: •. . ..11.:::::, ••,::..... ............. 4:-.1.:5••'-4:-•••11:1=.<., •. •,e.••• '11: ***' *.eki.t.:".•':''':4'.;41:• •••••: • •';'••, triz•.•... ••••• ,i ... •• ,-...itike ... ...{.!•,.1..,;r.:14f.',.......,.4,:.... !.1',::•..i•KI,'F.r.,:f....t.q.. i••••*1••••• • '•••••••• •.......nn..••;.•:,•••••••••1::•.....,...•••:!...!!:•X.• •'•••••4'•c•.::..;:i: ...x....,r, i.-4%Z.•111111.••:••61-.E.••• '. -•:-• •• ' . • --- •-. ..• ....... . • . . . ..... . . • . • • . .. • :•••••••:....... - • . . • • • .. . • . • . . ....IM . • . - • • . . . . ... . . . . . ,.....1....'• i • • .. .. • • • • '.4.17.1',1P• 111** 1 . • . .. • .•• . . . • . . • ,. •• 01 ..... ...,... • -• -7. .. .:**.' .** .......1.t.177W ..... .1: iii.45,981i • . . . . . . . . ••• .• . • . . • • •t.i. •!..„4...21Et.•.• VF( 1 • .1'..... :•.•-•.....4. • .. • • . • • . - • • •••rs 4 . . . • .• • • • .• . . . .. . . • • • • . .. . . . . • • • .. : r4;Oter r.,,...•.:.:.,.... rr.....„„ •• • ••••••• • • • '••••.. .• •• • - - . : ',.'•rr•••....• •' r 'H I . .. .• rirr.:*• . . • • • .. . . ... ........ .. . .... . . ... I • ,I.::: .• • K.-..4.,...1:::: • • • : • : i.T. 1 : • : 44, ,••••:'.1'., ..,:"..."..:i, r• • . . • • .••• • . .. . ... :.......4., („:: 4:. ••.. . ...:...::::::::, .. ••.•• • . • ... r-,, ' I......1.••rirk.' r. ......ri.:1:11"V ,.„„,,....;!!`.•!0.''. •''.. . .• . •:#.4.4 . ririlirl'...rri N.laii. 11:?. .••• .•'''.;•Ir'...;:.. . • • rill •• • .• .• ...• - • .J....:::::!::::rr'..„ : . „...• ...14 :;:::,... ..,, .....zir. • ...... . . . .• : ..:•:::::::::::P''.-;... ... ....... .• • . • ,%•;.5..... ,.. .:::....... .',II:,. ....:.:::::.......• : • • • .,, • .... ..•• • .-4:::1 . .. . • • . . ... fD Ia.*. 1Jbi • , %,-11k35, N . 53,AsT.E.p.4., 4Milr 1 A41~4111111L- __---__.__ , ) • • • 2 2 8.7 8 = '9 S% 74 mO .,,,,. ----- Nr4p•ivamil 0 • • 41' '* r' CHRISTOPHER J. FRESHLEY E-+ S ,C). A, OREGON ± L4pE w,C) -- , (4 + N4 • ETZGEf 1,\ CRES , /,.,■,.,,,,._ C .O. I A P,1` �o WE R POLE I I a I REVISIONS i Iklit ,it/ EXI'•TIN�I N '� L ► 1 Mil (\I -----: 1111 rill ;S._IL -... I EXISTING , Wit• DRIVEWAY i U "4 I i� 41,16 44 LYA1 EXISTING VEGETATION UI :` j i f E L s �, TO REMAIN i L___ _ ce EXISTING Ji STRUCTURE o a W -N'� � ill lommililli r_T_H:4 U 466. 1" $"tE / 5 D I- t,.O. ^ NIP k I � a O i I FA 0 Ali LL' ^a g'i17111 \ W i 1- - o Q EXISTING TREE z 3 ■�� TO REMAIN.I N. TYP. N �' rill •. I 4. EXISTING ANDSGAP cf.) n tY, !i : .' MI-- TO REMA 5.0' X 15.0' SIGN EASEMENT a � �•0 L . 15.00' Z F•4,o 410 , • ■��■■■■■L■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■ALL■ I•1-, . II' : : � ■ 15.00'III 20.0 X 15.0 SHARED•tc....:.... • ��������� _. WATER VAULT EASEMENT�`�''.1'1.: : gi :,: .. ■■■■■ELLr • ■ �i�•�'�I FOR HALL T OFFICE PARK ►I�iI _ 11111111111111111111111 SIDEWALK EASEMENT• \ :■. AND TEMPLE/ASHRAM o I•tE • � . . ■ [0.50' X 10.00 �* Il ■ N• 041. . ' N °00'00”E 287.79 V•� �` :' •. ii : , , • )% %/.��:�%/III __./ ILi�'IiL ■-.,, 1 a� EASE #95001167 --Irrirr,.. •.-,. .: . • I 12CI ii . #9 ° c.o. ___..____�___ .___ /� T• REMAIN (Tl' '). C� .., _ ___._�._.-___, r' ' - D SAN M H CJ W - ,�`� :'. - 1■I FLOW ___ - a .. `� �il �'r J` q JAI IE RIM 222 6 226.0 v!ral0P41 (641M10.04.0.0 "" 0 , • - "� rob . ,•...mom f CATCH BASIN ° " 289.85' � � .. . Ow 1111 E Q � l���lt�,• ■ RIM EL 221.98 N 8� P V. • .'s-N ./''''' . in I. EXISTING ENTRANCE I I EXISTING TREE Q 014 .. ' -: _ •'.: •.••' •LLLLLLL ■ ,i :• • . INTO KINDER-CARE I I z 4:.•••••-•: •:.., . _ ... . •.••••IILO DRIVEWAY ■II ��� �I� • " EASEMENT W• 4,1P: L:**. ••••••. ... .: - .. • ', ..'. ...... '• .... .• •-.. • .—• .. ..• ..'- ..: ••••• IF. • • - • - . - :•• • ..-••• LI 0v4i1 3 RO •:.• .,■■LLL�■■■■LLL■L■■L■■ is• ) 4;).° AIN ..- -:. . - .... "•. . In i• •• .. .• . • ., • . . .:. : 0 8 0 ._ ;// II. LANDSCAPE LEGEND•�► . . . • •. • • �i'/ �`��. ■ 00 SYMBOL COMMON NAME SIZE/COND. SPACING - .'" " • TREES BOTANICAL NAME �L�' U CO DC Deodora Cedar 6'-8' 20' o.c. Cedrus deodora . . . • • . • .. . . . ,• . . . .. . . . • • , •• . . . . i . . , .. .•. . �% O HC Hogan Cedar 12'-14' 10' o.c. I��� EXISTING ■ Thuja plicata 'Fastigiata' CY J Q Li 1, ♦ STRUCTURE - • • •' - •• • � • • • - • ° � RA :: : u: xycarpa 2" Cal. 30o.c• - O Raywoodii..:... :. : W RO ak 2" Cal. 20' o.c. • • ' z Quercus rubra ( n �/ /• •' " CATCH BASIN SHRUBS �, RIM EL 220.85 Q• .,.`��111! // 4 DG DV David Viburnum 3 Gal. 2.5' o.c.• `• �` 4 RO ... Viburnum davidii•3 RO : JH Japanese Holly 24"-30" 3' o.c. Q i� Ilex crenata 'Compacta' �� ro /i PROPOSED ASHRAM 6q ��-, '� � 0---,...01//// ,or N 89 !141 �} PL Portugese Laurel 24"-30" 4' o.c. N= = : • • •• • . ' •• FT 219 (MATCH EXIST . • • -. - �►� W Prunus lusitanica N. 611^11:7 �4 _` �' ��`, ,�� �\,11'i I' WP Waxleaf Privet 24"-30" 3.5' o.c. 0 �,�, r/� `\`` �/� STORM MANHOLE Ligustrum japonicum ?exanum I I I IJ Z vooa"� �` :i y,, RIM EL 219.50 z ~ ,,/1�,`� �'" ��i CU IE IN N 12" 210.75 GROUNDCOVER -1 a Q`� ® -� IEIN (E12 ) 210.85 QW n- `�� /// � �� ® ���!■I� •• • • 00 I E OUT (S 12") 209.45 Lawn W le Wit _ • psi ► Q NOTES 0 a- ~ op ellat�� �����r,„. ,����I� 1��.►'r/► ""1 ►.'��'ri�"� �'''►.`► ,� I. Irrigation to be provided by a fully automatic underground system. U " E 23 S8�• to 4. : "(n 2. Prune/shape, remove dead wood, dangerous branches, etc. of existing trees to remain. Clean up perimeter of existing trees to remain to I I I [-- C) CM II) (10) feet inside perimeter. Remove debris, weeds, undesirable brush, etc. u7 Q _ LiAlii * 1"=20' lik Existing Conifer Tree to Remain DATE: - 4-18-01 rPROJECT NO: 98122 SHEET NO Existing Deciduous Tree to Remain PLANNING' L 1_ -• D III , T ry. _ G : 20 0 20 40 OF e patoi.„,00003