Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Ordinance No. 26-05
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 26- 05 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT, CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002, TO REMOVE GOAL 5 PROTECTION FROM 0.003 ACRE OF LOCALLY SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS FROM THE "TIGARD WETLAND AND STREAM CORRIDOR MAP" INVENTORY ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT HALL BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Tigard Community Development Code (TCDC) Section 18.510.080 includes Special Provisions for Development within Locally Significant Wetlands and Along the Tualatin River, Fanno Creek, Ball Creek, and the South Fork of Ash Creek; and WHEREAS, TCDC 18.510.080.A. states in order to address the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 5 (Natural Resources) and the safe harbor provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 666-023-0040) pertaining to wetlands, all wetlands classified as significant on the City of Tigard "Wetlands and Streams Corridors Map"are protected. No land form alterations or developments are allowed within or partially within a significant wetland, except as allowed/approved pursuant to TCDC 18.510.100; and WHEREAS, TCDC 18.510.100 Plan Amendment Option, provides that any owner of property affected by the Goal 5 safe harbor(1) protection of significant wetlands, or (2) vegetated areas established for the Tualatin River, Fanno Creek, Ball Creek, and the South Fork of Ash Creek may apply for a quasi-judicial comprehensive plan amendment under Type IV procedure. This amendment must be based on a specific development proposal.The effect of the amendment would be to remove Goal 5 protection from the property, but not to remove the requirements related to the CWS Stormwater Connection Permit, which must be addressed separately through an alternatives analysis, as described in Section 3.02.5 of the CWS "Design and Construction Standards;"and WHEREAS, TCDC 18.510.100.B further provides that the applicant must demonstrate that such an amendment is justified by an environmental, social, economic and energy (ESEE) consequences analysis prepared in accordance with OAR 660-23-040; and WHEREAS, the applicant prepared an ESEE analysis (Exhibit C) in accordance with OAR 60-23-040, to justify removal of Goal 5 protection from 0.003 acre of significant wetlands from the subject property; and WHEREAS, on January 26, 2026, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing, which was noticed in accordance with city code, and recommended approval of the proposed CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 by a unanimous vote in favor; and WHEREAS,on March 3,2026,the Tigard City Council held a public hearing,which was noticed in accordance with city code, to consider the Commission's recommendation on CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002, to hear public testimony, and apply applicable decision-making criteria; and ORDINANCE No. 26-OS Page 1 WHEREAS, Council's decision to approve CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 and adopt this ordinance was based on the findings and conclusions found in Exhibit B and the associated land use record which is incorporated herein by reference and is contained in land use file CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Sensitive Lands Review (CMA2025-0003 and SLR2025-0002) is hereby approved. SECTION 2: The attached findings (Exhibit B) are hereby adopted as the basis for the Council's decision. SECTION 3: The ESEE analysis(Exhibit C) is incorporated by reference into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and the"Tigard Wetland and Stream Corridor Map" is amended to remove the site from the inventory, as approved. SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council,signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By u nom m oO S vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 'bc day of MAroh , 2026. Lindsay Bartholomew, Deputy City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this 3 rd day of M Ch , 2026. Yi- g Hu, Maydf Approved as to for • City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No.26-() Page 2 Preliminary Site Plan EXHIBIT A r7.--7------ s` Wit; . . . . . . . . . . i► - i #4 1. ••• #' - ---- ____,_._,r..,....,j ........IIIIIMPaga *44 I '=> It mot.. _ _ 1S w I . , 0,._ . IV 1 HALL BLVD l iN i ice9 m1 Fa — 1 F. C 11.3 Eli _.R .1► \ ���� N. ^p a III o 0 a l 3 e 4 V O V a o, ° 11 g I I I ! ppI 0 I i 00 ii73 p ° f f i O Q (�j i a�i p{ i C I il :Vtl it = ,C r 41 ?R 3 @ F3 g n 9 - - o g & = a � i 5 � m a.i .- 00 n�1 a r. gi , $t I g a, fa a I i I; oW . Exhibit B Hearing Date:March 3,2026 Time:6:30 PM PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL a • FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HALL BOULEVARD PEDESTRIAN CROSSING CASE NO.: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CMA2025-0003 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR2025-0002 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove Goal 5 safeharbor protection of 127 square feet of Tigard significant wetland vegetated corridor in order to replace an existing pedestrian crossing for the Fanno Creek Trail.The applicant is also requesting a sensitive lands review for impacts to the FNMA floodway. APPLICANT: Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Robert DeVassie 123 NW Flanders St Portland,OR 97209 APPLICANT'S DOWL REP: Matthew Robinson 5 Centerpointe Drive#350 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 OWNER: Same as applicant LOCATION: Right of Way at SW Hall Boulevard and Fanno Creek Trail Crossing COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Open Space ZONE: Parks and Recreation (PR) APPLICABLE Statewide Planning Goals 1,2,5,6,7, 11,and 12;Metro's Urban Growth PROVISIONS: Management Functional Plan Titles 3 and 8;Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.2, 1.2.1,2.1.3,2.1.16,2.1.17,2.1.22, 5.1.1,5.1.8,5.1.10,5.1.12, 6.2.1, 6.2.4,7.1.7,7.1.8,7.1.10, 11.1.1, 11.1.6, 11.4.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.2.4, PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 1 OF 43 12.3.6, 12.4.1,12.4.2, 12.5.1,and 13.1.1;and Tigard Community Development Code (TCDC)Chapters 18.140,18.510, 18.710, 18.790,and 18.910. SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends to the Tigard City Council APPROVAL, subject to conditions of approval,of the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Sensitive Lands Review as complying with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations,Statewide Planning Goals, and Metro policies,and that the applicant has demonstrated adequate public services exist to serve the property at the intensity of the proposed zoning. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY SITE WORK The applicant must prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DIVISION,ATTN: Buck Smith,Principal Engineer at(503)718-2464 or Buck.Smitha,tigard-or.gov.The cover letter must clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. Improvements associated with public infrastructure including street and right-of-way dedication,utilities,grading,water quality and quantity facilities,streetlights,easements, easement locations,and utility connections must be designed in accordance with the following codes and standards: • City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards • Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards • City of Tigard Community Development Codes and Municipal Codes • Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue(TVF&R) Fire Codes • Other applicable County,State,and Federal Codes and Standard Guidelines 2. Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must obtain approval of a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)Permit to cover all improvements associated with public infrastructure work,including stormwater management facilities,or any other work in the public right-of-way. An Engineering cost estimate of improvements associated with public infrastructures including but not limited to street.street grading.utilities.stormwater quality and water quantity facilities, sanitary sewer.streetlights.and franchise utilities are required at the time of PFI permit submittal. When the water system is under the City of Tigard jurisdiction,an Engineering cost estimate of water improvement must be listed as a separate line item from the total cost estimate. 3. Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant must submit site plans and a final storm drainage report for approval indicating how run-off generated by the development will be PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 2 OF 43 collected, conveyed, treated, and detained. The storm drainage report must be prepared and include a maintenance plan in accordance with CWS Design and Construction Standards and the City of Tigard Standards. 4. Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant must obtain a CWS Stormwater Connection Authorization prior to issuance of the City of Tigard PH Permit.Plans must be submitted to the City of Tigard for review. The City will forward plans and the storm drainage report to CWS after preliminary review for CWS's review and approval. 5. Prior to final acceptance,the applicant must submit a two years of maintenance assurance for all required public improvements and enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement with the City. 6. Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant must provide a performance bond for all public improvements facilities associated with the development. 7. Prior to final acceptance,the applicant must complete all improvements associated with public infrastructure under the City and CWS jurisdiction. Public infrastructure includes,but is not limited to,street improvements,streetlights,street trees,sidewalks,public and private stormwater management facilities,sanitary sewer,water,natural gas,electrical,and telecommunication.The applicant must receive conditional acceptance from the City of Tigard. 8. Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must submit the exact legal name,address,and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the"Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements.Specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership,LLC,etc. and the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. 9. Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must submit a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking must be provided onsite. Parking construction vehicles or equipment on adjacent residential public streets is prohibited. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application and must include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 10. Prior to commencing any site improvements,the applicant must obtain an approved Erosion& Sediment Control(ESC)permit. 11. Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant must submit a final grading plan showing the existing and proposed contours for approval. The plan must detail the provisions for surface drainage of all lots and show that they will be graded to ensure that surface drainage is directed to the street or a public storm drainage system approved by the Engineering Division. The design engineer must indicate areas that will have natural slopes between 10 percent and 20 percent, as well as areas that will have natural slopes in excess of 20 percent. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections or permits will be necessary. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 3 OF 43 12. Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must provide a final photometric analysis of the proposed development frontages for the review and approval. Photometric analysis will follow the recommended values and requirements described in ANSI/IESNA. The analysis must show the location of streetlights;and the type and color of the pole and light fixture.All public streetlights must be PGE Option B. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Description: The total project area is approximately 7,405 square feet (0.17 acres) located along SW Hall Blvd between SW Omara St and SW Burnham St at the existing pedestrian crossing for the Fanno Creek Trail. The project area includes portions of eight (8) parcels, all zoned PR, although the proposed project will occur largely within the existing SW Hall Blvd right-of-way. The existing crossing consists of a pedestrian-activated signal that is non-compliant.The crossing has a history of crashes and near-misses, leading to its replacement being identified in the City's Capital Improvement Plan as project#95083. Land uses surrounding the project area include civic uses including city hall, the city library, Fanno Creek House, and a church and parks and open spaces, including Fanno Creek Park and Brown Natural Area. The project area also contains and is adjacent to numerous environmental resources, including Fanno Creek and significant wetlands with associated vegetated corridors, and FEMA special flood hazard area,including FEMA floodway. Proposed Request: The proposed project will replace the existing Fanno Creek Trail pedestrian crossing at SW Hall Blvd with a new, safer crossing. The new crossing will be a pedestrian-activated crossing, known as a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RFFB). As shown on the Land Use Figures (Exhibit A) and Preliminary Design Plans (Exhibit G),the proposed improvements include paving,curb ramps,signage, illumination,RRFB pedestrian signals,and new stormwater outfalls on both sides of the road. As a result of necessary stormwater improvements related to the new crossing, permanent and temporary impacts to City-designated sensitive lands are proposed. As the project is located within the vegetated corridor associated with a significant wetland and the floodway, the applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan map amendment to the 'Wetland and Stream Corridors Map" and a sensitive lands review for impacts to Fanno Creek and the floodway.The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is specifically requested to remove protection from a combined total of approximately 0.003 acres of vegetated corridor associated with locally significant wetlands. The amendment is supported by an environmental, social, economic and energy (ESEE) analysis (Attachment 3). This comprehensive plan map change will allow for the construction of a critical facility that would otherwise be prohibited due to the location of existing locally significant wetlands. Two (2) significant wetlands are present within the project area as field-verified by the applicant and shown on Exhibit A, Figure 6. The breakdown of impacts to significant resources is outlined in the following table. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 4 OF 43 Permanent Total Regulated City Resource Areas Impact Area (sq ft/acres) (sq ft/acres) Significant Wetland A 107/0.002 649/ 0.015 Significant Wetland B 20/0.0005 69 /0.001 All Significant Wetlands Combined 127/0.003 718 / 0.016 Decision Process The application is processed through a Type III-Modified procedure. The Planning Commission will make a recommendation to City Council on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. The Council may approve the amendment, approve with conditions, deny the amendment, or remand the amendment back to Planning Commission. SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal and be given an opportunity to provide comments prior to a decision being made.The Planning Commission hearing was scheduled for January 26,2026. Staff mailed a Type III Notice of Public Hearing regarding this application to affected parties on January 6,2026. The notice was posted at the project site on January 12,2026.No comments were received prior to the hearing. On January 26, 2026, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on this case,however no members of the public provided testimony. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA This section contains all of the applicable city,state,and Metro policies,provisions,and criteria that apply to the proposed comprehensive plan map amendment. Statewide Planning Goals: Goal 1:Citizen Involvement Goal 2:Land Use Planning Goal 5:Natural Resources,Scenic and Historic Areas,and Open Spaces Goal 6:Air,Water and Land Resources Quality Goal 7:Areas Subject to Natural Hazards Goal 11:Public Facilities and Services Goal 12:Transportation METRO Functional Plan: Title 3:Water Quality and Flood Management Title 8: Compliance Procedures City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan: Chapter 1:Citizen Involvement,Policies 1.1.2 and 1.2.1 Chapter 2:Land Use Planning,Policies 2.1.3,2.1.16,2.1.17,2.1.22 Chapter 5:Natural Resources,Areas and Open Spaces,Policies 5.1.1,5.1.8,5.1.10,5.1.12 Chapter 6:Air,Water and Land Resources Quality,Policies 6.2.1,6.2.4 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 5 OF 43 Chapter 7:Areas Subject to Natural Hazards,7.1.7,7.1.8,7.1.10 Chapter 11:Public Facilities and Services,Policies 11.1.1,11.1.6,11.4.2 Chapter 12:Transportation,12.1.1,12.1.2,12.2.4,12.3.6,12.4.1,12.4.2,12.5.1 Chapter 13:Energy Conservation,13.1.1 Tigard Community Development Code 18.140 Parks and Recreation Zone 18.510 Sensitive Lands 18.710 Land Use Review Procedures 18.790 Text and Map Amendments 18.910 Improvement Standards SECTION VI. APPLICABLE CRITERIA, FINDINGS,AND CONCLUSIONS The following subsections address only the criteria applicable to this decision. Statewide Planning Goals Goal 1—Citizen Involvement: This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for the land use planning process, including the adoption of Comprehensive Plans and changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents. FINDING: Citizens,affected agencies,and other jurisdictions were given the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Several opportunities for participation are built into the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment process, including public hearing notification requirements pursuant to Chapter 18.710 of the Tigard Community Development Code.This goal is satisfied. Goal 2—Land Use Planning: This goal outlines the land use planning process and policy framework. FINDING: The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) has acknowledged the city's Comprehensive Plan as being consistent with the statewide planning goals.The Development Code implements the Comprehensive Plan. The Development Code establishes a process and standards to review changes to the Tigard Development Code in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and other applicable state requirements. As discussed within this report,the applicable Development Code process and standards have been applied to the proposed amendment, and the intent of these amendments are to meet the requirement of state law,administrative rules,and the Statewide Planning Goals. This goal is satisfied. Goal 5—Natural Resources,Scenic and Historic Areas,and Open Spaces: This goal outlines how cities must protect,inventory,and plan for natural and historic resources including waterways,groundwater,wildlife habitat,and trails. FINDING: The applicant has conducted a site assessment in the project area in compliance with this goal as well as an ESEE analysis (Exhibit C) prepared in compliance with OAR 60-23-040, to justify removal of Goal 5 protection from approximately 127 square feet(0.003 acre)of significant wetlands and vegetated corridor associated with Fanno Creek on the subject property.The project has been designed to avoid and minimize impacts to natural resources including waterways, groundwater,wildlife habitat, PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 6 OF 43 and trails to the greatest extent practicable.This goal is satisfied. Goal 6—Air,Water and Land Resources Quality: This goal outlines how cities must consider protection of air, water and land resources from pollution by using a variety of market,zoning and management tools. FINDING:The project has been designed to avoid and minimize impacts to natural resources including waterways, groundwater,wildlife habitat, and trails to the greatest extent practicable. Additionally, the applicant is proposing new stormwater management facilities designed to meet local,state,and federal requirements.While treatment and detention cannot be provided within the project area,the applicant is proposing to meet CWS requirements for treatment and detention through a fee-in-lieu payment,which will help fund regional stormwater management projects, such as stream enhancements, system improvements, treatment facility upgrades, and maintenance of existing systems,which will contribute to improved water quality.This goal is satisfied. Goal 7—Areas Subject to Natural Hazards: This goal outlines how cities must protect people and property from natural hazards. FINDING:The proposed map amendment will allow replacement of a facility that will protect people and property in an area subject to flooding. The proposed project has been designed to meet FEMA no-rise requirements and with materials resistant to flood and water damage, including conduit and wiring for new roadway lighting and RRFB signal infrastructure. Consistency with the city's Natural Hazard goals and policies are discussed later in this report under applicable policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan.This goal is satisfied. Goal 11—Public Facilities and Services: This goal outlines the timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. FINDING:The proposed map amendment will allow replacement of a facility identified as a priority on the city's Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), which is designed to ensure timely, orderly, and efficient construction and maintenance of public facilities and services. The project also includes an associated stormwater management facility.These facilities will serve existing and future development. This goal is satisfied. Goal 12—Transportation: This goal outlines how each city must develop a transportation system plan that considers all modes of transportation. FINDING:The project will replace the Fanno Creek Trail's existing crossing at SW Hall Blvd,which has a history of crashes and near misses with a pedestrian-activated RRFB crossing that will be safer for all users,including pedestrians, cyclists,and motorists. Consistency with the city's Transportation System Plan goals and policies are discussed later in this report under applicable policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan.This goal is satisfied. CONCLUSION: Based on the above analysis,all statewide goals have been fully met. METRO Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 3:Water Quality and Flood Management PLANNING COMIVIISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 7 OF 43 The purpose of this chapter is to protect the beneficial water uses and functions and values of resources within the Water Quality and Flood Management Areas by limiting or mitigating the impact on these areas from development activities and protecting life and property from dangers associated with flooding. FINDING: This tide has been met by limiting the development activity within the Water Quality and Flood Management Area to the necessary replacement of the pedestrian crossing and associated facilities. The proposed project has been designed to meet FEMA no-rise requirements, ensuring that flood conditions are not created or worsened downstream as a result of the proposed improvements. The footprint has been minimized to the extent possible while allowing for the crossing to be improved with curb ramps, signage,illumination,RRFB pedestrian signals, and new stormwater outfalls on both sides of the road to improve safety and protect life and property for users of all modes of transportation.This title is satisfied. Title 8: Compliance Procedures The purposes of this chapter are to establish a process for ensuring city or county compliance with requirements of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan and for evaluating and informing the region about the effectiveness of those requirements. FINDING: This title has been met by complying with the Tigard Development Code notice requirements set forth in Section 18.710.080 (Type III-Modified Procedure). On January 6,2026,notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was sent to the interested parties list and all property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels. On January 15,2026,the proposal was posted on the City's web site. On January 12,2026,the site was posted with a notice board. On January 15,2026,the staff report was made available.A minimum of two public hearings will be held(one before the Planning Commission and the second before the City Council) at which an opportunity for public input is provided.This title is satisfied. CONCLUSION: As shown in the analysis above,the proposal is in compliance with all applicable Titles of Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 1: Citizen Involvement Goal1.1 Provide citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policy 2 The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. FINDING: Citizens,affected agencies,and other jurisdictions were given the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Several opportunities for participation are built into the Comprehensive Plan amendment process,including public hearing notification requirements pursuant to Chapter 18.710 of the Tigard Community Development Code.This policy is met. Goal 1.2 Ensure all citizens have access to: PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 8 OF 43 A. opportunities to communicate directly to the City; and B. information on issues in an understandable form Policy 1 The City shall ensure pertinent information is readily accessible to the community and presented in such a manner that even technical information is easy to understand. FINDING:The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on October 8,2025.On January 6,2026,a public hearing notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was sent to the interested parties list and all property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels. On January 15,2026,the proposal was posted on the City's web site. On January 12, 2026, the site was posted with a notice board. On January 15, 2026 the staff report was made available.This policy is met. Goal 2: Land Use Planning Goal 2.1 Maintain an up-to-date Comprehensive Plan,implementing regulations and action plans as the legislative foundation of Tigard's land use planning program. Policy 3 The City shall coordinate the adoption, amendment, and implementation of its land use program with other potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies. FINDING:The project was designed in coordination with the applicable affected City agencies including the Public Works,Community Development,and Parks&Recreation departments,in addition to Clean Water Services and the Department of State Lands. A request for comments was sent to applicable outside agencies,whose comments are included as Attachment 3. Additionally,notice of this application was provided to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD)35 days prior to the first evidentiary hearing on this application.This policy is met. Policy 8 The City shall require that appropriate public facilities are made available, or committed,prior to development approval and are constructed prior to, or concurrently with,development occupancy. FINDING:The project includes construction of stormwater outfalls on both sides of the roadway.Street improvements will be constructed by the applicant in accordance with Tigard Municipal Code 18.910 and the City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards. Further compliance will be demonstrated at the time of the applicant's Public Facility Improvement(PFI) permit submittal.This policy is met. Policy 16 The City may condition the approval of a Plan/Zoning map amendment to assure the development of a definite land use(s) and per specific design /development requirements. FINDING: This application includes specific development plans meeting CWS and city standards. Conditions of approval will be included with the decision.This policy is met. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 9 OF 43 Policy 17 The City may allow concurrent applications to amend the Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Map(s) and for development plan approval of a specific land use. FINDING:This application includes a comprehensive plan map amendment and sensitive lands review as concurrent applications for the construction of the pedestrian crossing.This policy is met. Policy 22 The City shall identify, designate,and protect natural resources as part of its land use program. FINDING:The City has identified significant wetlands within its'Wetlands and Streams Corridors Map" and has also adopted Goal 5 protections within TDC 18.510 for sensitive lands, including significant wetlands and riparian areas associated with a number of waterways,including Fanno Creek.The applicant is following the correct procedures to request approval of impacts to these natural resource areas. As described in more detail within the applicant's ESEE analysis (Exhibit C) and CWS standard site assessment(Exhibit H),the applicant is proposing a fee-in-lieu in order to ensure no net loss of significant functions and values.This policy is met. Policy 23 The City shall require new development, including public infrastructure,to minimize conflicts by addressing the need for compatibility between it and adjacent existing and future land uses. FINDING: The proposed pedestrian crossing and associated facilities will minimize conflict and are compatible with the adjacent existing and future uses.The site is currently surrounded by a number of civic uses which will be better served by a safer transportation facility that is less prone to crashes.This policy is met. Goal 5:Natural Resources,Areas and Open Spaces Goal 5.1 Protect natural resources and the environmental and ecological functions they provide and,to the extent feasible,restore natural resources to create naturally functioning systems and high levels of biodiversity. Policy 1 The City shall protect and, to the extent feasible,restore natural resources in a variety of methods to:A. contribute to the City's scenic quality and its unique sense of place;B.provide educational opportunities,recreational amenities, and buffering between differential land uses; C. maximize natural resource functions and services including fish and wildlife habitat and water quality; and D. result in healthy and naturally functioning systems containing a high level of biodiversity. FINDING:The Fanno Creek Trail corridor is constrained by natural resources and mapped significant wetlands along its alignment on both the east and west side of SW Hall Blvd.Because the proposed RRFB crossing must connect to the existing trail segments on both sides of the roadway,opportunities to design necessary project improvements for further avoidance of sensitive lands are limited due to the need for PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 10 OF 43 the proposed crossing to be in generally the same location as the existing crossing. The applicant has designed the project to avoid and minimize impacts to natural resources to the greatest extent practicable, with total significant wetland impacts limited to approximately 127 square feet. As described in the applicant's ESEE Analysis (Exhibit C),the applicant is proposing to use various best management practices (BMPs) during construction to protect significant wetlands and other natural resources from unintended impacts. Additionally, as described in the Preliminary Stormwater Report (Exhibit J),the applicant is proposing to meet CWS requirements for treatment and detention through a fee-in-lieu payment due to an inability to provide for treatment and detention within the project area, which will help fund regional stormwater management projects, such as stream enhancements, system improvements, treatment facility upgrades, and maintenance of existing systems that will maximize natural resources functions and contribute to a healthy regional system. While no direct educational opportunities are proposed with this project,users of the nearby public library as well as Fanno Creek trail users will benefit from the enhanced recreational amenities provided by the project and the indirect educational opportunity provided by greater engagement with the trail and the creek. Policy 8 The City shall protect and,to the extent feasible,restore the diverse ecological and non-ecological functions and services of streams, wetlands, and associated riparian corridors. FINDING: As described within the applicant's ESEE analysis (Exhibit C) and the CWS standard site assessment(Exhibit H),the applicant is proposing to use various BMPs and avoidance measures during construction to protect significant wetlands and the Fanno Creek vegetated corridor to the maximum extent practicable.The applicant is proposing to meet CWS requirements for treatment and detention through a fee-in-lieu payment due to an inability to provide for treatment and detention within the project area, which will help fund regional stormwater management projects, such as stream enhancements, system improvements, treatment facility upgrades, and maintenance of existing systems (see Exhibit J).This policy is met. Policy 10 The City shall complete a baseline inventory of significant natural resources and update or improve it as necessary, such as at the time of Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review, changes to Metro or State programs, or to reflect changed conditions,circumstances, and community values. FINDING: The City has conducted an inventory of natural resources in compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 5.The applicant is proposing amendments to the City's'Wetlands and Streams Corridors Map",a component of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan,in order to permit impacts to significant wetlands and Fanno Creek vegetated corridor areas as described throughout this narrative and the associated documents submitted with the application. On approval of this request, the ESEE analysis will be incorporated by reference into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan,and the`Wetlands and Streams Corridors Map"will be amended to remove the area from the inventory.This policy is met. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 11 OF 43 Policy 12 The City shall develop and implement standards and procedures that mitigate the loss of natural resource functions and services,with priority given to protection over mitigation. FINDING: The Fanno Creek Trail corridor is constrained by natural resources and mapped significant wetlands along its alignment on both the east and west side of SW Hall Blvd and offers limited opportunity to avoid natural resources while still implementing a project that meets the identified purpose and need. Because the proposed RRFB crossing must connect to the existing trail segments on both sides of the roadway, opportunities to design necessary project improvements for further avoidance of sensitive lands, while still meeting the project's purpose of creating a safer pedestrian crossing are limited due to the need for the proposed crossing to be in generally the same location as the existing crossing.The applicant has designed the project to avoid and minimize impacts to natural resources to the greatest extent practicable,as described within the applicant's ESEE Analysis(Exhibit C) and CWS Standard Site Assessment (Exhibit H).This policy is met. Goal 6.2 Ensure land use activities protect and enhance the community's water quality. Policy 1 The City shall require that all development complies with or exceeds regional, state, and federal standards for water quality. FINDING:As described in the Preliminary Stormwater Report(Exhibit J),the applicant is proposing new stormwater management facilities that are designed to meet CWS DCS requirements. While treatment and detention cannot be provided within the project area,the applicant is proposing to meet CWS requirements for treatment and detention through a fee-in-lieu payment,which will help fund regional stormwater management projects, such as stream enhancements, system improvements, treatment facility upgrades, and maintenance of existing systems.This policy is met. Policy 4 The City shall protect,restore, and enhance,to the extent practical,the natural functions of stream corridors,trees, and water resources for their positive contribution to water quality. FINDING:As described within the applicant's ESEE analysis (Exhibit C) and the CWS standard site assessment (Exhibit H), the applicant is incorporating best management practices and avoidance measures to protect the significant wetlands and other natural resources in the area.The applicant has designed the project to avoid and minimize impacts to significant wetlands and Fanno Creek's vegetated corridor areas to the maximum extent practicable. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to meet CWS requirements for treatment and detention through a fee-in-lieu payment,which will help fund regional stormwater management projects,such as stream enhancements,system improvements, treatment facility upgrades, and maintenance of existing systems.This policy is met. Goal 7.1 Protect people and property from flood,landslide,earthquake,wildfire,and severe weather hazards. Policy 7 The City shall comply with the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) flood regulations,which include standards for base flood levels,flood proofing, and minimum finished floor elevations. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL.PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 12 OF 43 FINDING:The proposed project has been designed based on current FEMA floodplain maps and, as identified in the No-Rise Certification (Exhibit K), has been designed to meet FEMA no-rise requirements.Additionally,the proposed project has been designed with materials resistant to flood and water damage.No habitable structures or buildings are proposed in the project area.This policy is met. Policy 8 The City shall prohibit any land form alterations or developments in the 100-year floodplain which would result in any rise in elevation of the 100-year floodplain. FINDING: Consistent with this policy, the project has been designed to meet FEMA no-rise requirements,as identified in the submitted No-Rise Certification (Exhibit K).This policy is met. Policy 10 The City shall work with Clean Water Services to protect natural drainageways and wetlands as valuable water retention areas and, where possible,find ways to restore and enhance these areas. FINDING: The applicant has coordinated the proposed project closely with Clean Water Services (CWS). The applicant submitted a standard site assessment (Exhibit H) to CWS, which has issued a Service Provider Letter (SPL25-002811). As described within the standard site assessment and ESEE analysis (Exhibit C), the applicant has carefully designed the project to avoid and minimize impacts to significant wetlands and Fanno Creek's vegetated corridor areas to the maximum extent practicable and is proposing to use various best management practices and avoidance measures during construction to protect significant wetlands and other natural resources from unintended impacts.As no feasible on-site mitigation areas were found in the limited project area,the applicant will pay a fee-in-lieu which will help fund regional stormwater management projects.This policy is met. Goal 11.1 Develop and maintain a stormwater system that protects development,water resources,and wildlife habitat. Policy 1 The City shall require that all new development: A. construct the appropriate stormwater facilities or ensure construction by paying their fair share of the cost; B. comply with adopted plans and standards for stormwater management; and C. meet or exceed regional, state, and federal standards for water quality and flood protection FINDING: As described in the stormwater report submitted with the application (Exhibit J), the applicant is proposing new stormwater management facilities,which have been designed to meet CWS DCS requirements. While treatment and detention cannot be provided within the project area, the applicant is proposing to meet CWS requirements for treatment and detention through a fee-in-lieu payment,which will help fund regional stormwater management projects,such as stream enhancements, system improvements, treatment facility upgrades, and maintenance of existing systems. This will contribute to improved water quality in the region and help protect Fanno Creek's stormwater conveyance and treatment functions.This policy is met. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 13 OF 43 Policy 6 The City shall maintain streams and wetlands in their natural state,to the extent necessary,to protect their stormwater conveyance and treatment functions. FINDING:The project's design will require impacts to designated locally significant wetlands and Fanno Creek vegetated corridor areas. However, the project will incorporate best management practices and avoidance measures to protect significant wetlands and other natural resources from unintended impacts, as described in greater detail within the applicant's ESEE Analysis (Exhibit C) and the CWS Standard Site Assessment (Exhibit H).Additionally,as described in the Preliminary Stormwater Report (Exhibit J), the applicant is proposing to meet CWS requirements for treatment and detention through a fee-in- lieu payment due to an inability to provide for treatment and detention within the project area.This fee- in-lieu will help fund regional stormwater management projects, such as stream enhancements, system improvements,treatment facility upgrades,and maintenance of existing systems.This policy is met. Goal 11.4 Maintain adequate public facilities and services to meet the health,safety,education, and leisure needs of all Tigard residents. Policy 2 The City shall continue to develop and maintain a Capital Improvement Plan to help provide for the orderly provision of public facilities and services. FINDING:The proposed project has been identified on the Tigard Capital Improvement Plan(CIP) as project #95083. The infrastructure needs identified through the CIP are necessary for the orderly provision of public facilities and services and are critical to the economy of Tigard and the region. The proposed project supports this policy by delivering a project identified on the City's CIP.This policy is met. Chapter 12:Transportation Goal 12.1 Provide a safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users, especially pedestrians and other vulnerable users. Policy 1 The City shall prioritize transportation projects according to community benefit, including (but not limited to) safety, performance, and accessibility,as well as the associated costs and impacts. FINDING: The proposal delivers a transportation project identified on the city's CIP that provides numerous community benefits.The project was identified on the CIP as being critical to the economy of Tigard by maintaining safe access to jobs, schools, and essential services. This connection provides a critical link between the main city campus and downtown, the Fanno Creek Trail, and the city's public library facility.This policy is met. Policy 2 The City shall design, maintain, enhance, and invest in a transportation system that emphasizes multi-modal travel options for all types of land uses. FINDING:The project benefits the community by replacing the existing Fanno Creek Trail crossing at SW Hall Blvd with a safer,pedestrian-activated RRFB crossing.The existing Fanno Creek Trail crossing PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 14 OF 43 at SW Hall Blvd has a history of crashes and near misses and the proposed project seeks to create a safer and more comfortable facility for all users including pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers by providing upgraded lighting,signage,and curb ramps;therefore,improving existing multi-modal travel options for the community.This policy is met. Goal 12.2 Support environmental and community health by reducing our carbon footprint, minimizing impacts to natural resources, and addressing unequal health impacts/outcomes of our transportation system on low-income communities and communities of color. Policy 4 The City shall mitigate impacts to the natural environment associated with proposed transportation construction or reconstruction projects. FINDING:The project will require impacts to significant wetlands and Fanno Creek vegetated corridor areas. However, the project will incorporate best management practices and avoidance measures to protect significant wetlands and other natural resources from unintended impacts,as described in greater detail within the applicant's ESEE analysis (Exhibit C) and the CWS standard site assessment (Exhibit H).The applicant has carefully designed the project to avoid and minimize impacts to these areas to the maximum extent practicable.Despite impacts to these areas,the project supports this policy by providing a safer crossing for users of the Fanno Creek Trail.This has the overall impact of supporting alternative transportation methods and reducing Tigard's carbon footprint,creating a more environmentally healthy community.This policy is met. Goal 12.3. Improve quality of life for all, particularly historically marginalized and underserved communities, by providing access to jobs, schools, and essential services with convenient and affordable travel options. Policy 6 The City shall work to address and enhance the safety and transportation needs of vulnerable users. FINDING:The project will replace the Fanno Creek Trail's existing non-compliant crossing at SW Hall Blvd,which has a history of crashes and near misses,with a pedestrian-activated RRFB crossing that will be safer for all users by providing upgraded lighting and signage. These improvements will serve to provide a more effective warning to drivers that someone is trying to cross the road.This policy is met. Goal 12.4 Create livable neighborhoods that are designed to improve multimodal connections while discouraging unsafe interactions. Policy 1 The City shall develop and maintain neighborhood and local connections to provide efficient circulation in and out of the neighborhoods. FINDING:The project maintains critical infrastructure to continue to provide efficient circulation within this segment of SW Hall Boulevard.This policy is met. Policy 2 The City shall design all projects on Tigard city streets to encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 15 OF 43 FINDING: The project supports this policy by creating a safer pedestrian crossing for users of the Fanno Creek Trail by improving illumination and signage. This will reduce unsafe interactions between pedestrians,cyclists and vehicles which will in turn encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel.This policy is met. Goal 12.5 Support economic vibrancy by accommodating the movement of people and goods and creating equitable opportunities for economic development throughout Tigard. Policy 1 The City shall manage the transportation system to support desired economic development activities. FINDING: The project improves Tigard's transportation system by upgrading infrastructure critical to Tigard's livability and economic vitality. The importance of the pedestrian crossing's replacement is evident through its identification on Tigard's CIP. The infrastructure needs identified through the CIP are critical to the economy of Tigard and the overall region by accommodating the safe and efficient movement of people and goods.This policy is met. Chapter 13:Energy Consrevation Goal 13.1 Reduce energy consumption. Policy 1 The City shall promote the reduction of energy consumption associated with vehicle miles traveled through: A.Land use patterns that reduce dependency on the automobile; B.Public transit that is reliable,connected,and efficient;and C. Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure that is safe and well connected. FINDING:The project supports these policies by providing a safer pedestrian crossing for users of the Fanno Creek Trail, which supports alternative transportation methods that can help reduce Tigard's carbon footprint and support a more environmentally healthy community. CONCLUSION: As shown in the analysis above, the proposal complies with all applicable policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. 18.140 PARKS AND RECREATION ZONE 18.140.030 Other Zoning Regulations Sites with overlay zones,plan districts,inventoried hazards, or sensitive lands are subject to additional regulations. Specific uses or developments may also be subject to regulations as provided elsewhere in this title. FINDING:The project area contains sensitive lands that are proposed to be impacted by the proposed improvements, including significant wetlands, floodplain, and vegetated corridors. The applicable provisions of Chapter 18.510 Sensitive Lands are addressed later in this report. 18.140.040 Land Use Standards PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 16 OF 43 A. General provisions.A list of allowed, restricted, conditional, and prohibited uses in the PR zone is provided in Table 18.140.1. If a use category is not listed,see Section 18.60.030. FINDING:The proposed project will occur completely within existing right-of-way associated with SW Hall Blvd;therefore no development standards apply. 18.510 SENSITIVE LANDS 18.510.020 Applicability A. CWS stormwater connection permit.All proposed development must obtain a stormwater connection permit from CWS in compliance with its design and construction standards. FINDING: The applicant submitted a standard site assessment to CWS and a Service Provider Letter (CWS File No. 25-002811) was issued. The applicant will obtain the necessary stormwater connection permit.This standard is met. G. Sensitive lands approvals issued by the hearings officer. 1. Sensitive land reviews within special flood hazard areas are processed through a Type III-HO procedure,as provided in Section 18.710.070, for the following actions: a. Ground disturbance or landform alterations in all floodway areas; b. Ground disturbance or landform alterations in floodway fringe locations involving more than 50 cubic yards of material; c. Repair,reconstruction, or improvement of an existing structure or utility, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction provided no development occurs in the floodway; d. Structures intended for human habitation;and e. Accessory structures that are greater than 528 square feet in size, outside of floodway areas. 2. The approval authority will approve, approve with conditions,or deny a sensitive lands review application using the approval criteria provided in Section 18.510.070. FINDING:The proposal includes ground disturbance in the floodway area. In accordance with TDC 18.710.090,this application is being reviewed through a Type III-Modified process with the Tigard City Council as the final review authority as the proposal also includes a request to remove a significant wetland designation.The approval criteria in Section 18.510.070 are addressed later in this report. 18.510.050 General Provisions for Wetlands A. Code compliance requirements. Wetland regulations apply to those areas classified as significant on the City of Tigard "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map," and to a vegetated corridor ranging from 25 to 200 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the wetland,as provided in"Table 3.1,Vegetated Corridor Widths," and"Appendix C,Natural Resource Assessments,"of the CWS"Design and Construction Standards."Wetland locations may include but are not limited to those areas identified as wetlands in"Wetland Inventory and Assessment for the City of Tigard,Oregon,"Fishman Environmental Services, 1994. FINDING:The project area contains two wetlands,Wetlands A and B,as shown on Exhibit A,Figure 5. Both are identified as significant wetlands on the City of Tigard 'Wetland and Streams Corridors PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL.PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 17 OF 43 Map". The boundaries of these wetlands include vegetated corridors measured 50 feet horizontally from the delineated wetland boundary as specified in CWS Design and Construction Standards. The boundaries have been field verified by the applicant's engineering consultant,DOWL. B. Delineation of wetland boundaries.Precise boundaries may vary from those shown on wetland maps; specific delineation of wetland boundaries may be necessary.Wetland delineation will be done by qualified professionals at the applicant's expense. FINDING: A wetland delineation was provided by the applicant and is included as Exhibit F. The wetland delineation was prepared by a team of qualified professionals,including wetland scientists and ecologists. 18.510.070 Sensitive Lands Applications. A. Approval required.An applicant,who wishes to develop within a sensitive area,as defined in this chapter, must obtain approval in certain situations. Depending on the nature and intensity of the proposed activity within a sensitive area,either a Type II or Type III review is required, as provided in Subsections 18.510.020.F and G. The approval criteria for different types of sensitive areas are provided in Subsections 18.510.070.B—E. FINDING:The proposal includes ground disturbance in the floodway area,significant wetlands,Fanno Creek,and the associated vegetated corridors;therefore a Type III review is required. B. Within the special flood hazard area.The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions an application for sensitive lands review within the special flood hazard area when all of the following criteria are met: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title; FINDING:The project complies with the applicable requirements of this title as provided below. 2. Land form alterations must preserve or enhance the special flood hazard area storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway must not result in any encroachments, including fill,new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge; a. If in the floodway and no-rise requirement is met, the development will comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions. FINDING: Due to the extent of regulated floodway along Fanno Creek, the proposed pedestrian crossing and associated improvements will be located within the floodway. All improvements have been sited and designed to meet no-rise requirements as detailed in the submitted No-Rise Certification (Exhibit lc The project will comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions as detailed in the response to the criteria of Section 18.510.040 in this report.These standards are met. 3. Land form alterations or developments within the special flood hazard area are allowed only in areas designated as commercial, industrial, or parks and recreation on the comprehensive plan land use map,except that alterations or developments associated PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 18 OF 43 with community service uses, utilities, or public support facilities are allowed on residentially zoned properties subject to applicable zoning standards; FINDING: The proposed land form alterations are located within the special flood hazard area in an area zoned Parks and Recreation(PR)on the comprehensive plan land use map.This standard is met. 4. Where a landform alteration or development is allowed to occur within the special flood hazard area it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood; FINDING: All proposed improvements in the flood hazard area have been sited and designed to avoid any increase in the surface elevation of the 100-year flood, as detailed in the No-Rise Certification (Exhibit K) submitted by the applicant.This standard is met. 5. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian or bicycle pathway in compliance with the adopted Transportation System Plan or Greenways Trail System Master Plan,unless the construction of said pathway is deemed as untimely; FINDING: The Fanno Creek Trail is an identified pedestrian trail within the City's Transportation System Plan and Greenway Trail System Master Plan;therefore,the proposed improvements are allowed. This standard is met. 6. Pedestrian or bicycle pathway projects within the special flood hazard area must include a wildlife habitat assessment that shows the proposed alignment minimizes impacts to significant wildlife habitat while balancing the community's recreation and environmental educational goals; FINDING:The proposed project is utilizing existing public right-of-way associated with SW Hall Blvd. Because the proposed project is intended to create a safer pedestrian crossing for the Fanno Creek Trail, the proposed project improvements must occur in the approximate location of the existing crossing in order to align with the trail on either side of the roadway.Alternative alignments are not possible because they would not achieve the project's purpose of replacing the existing trail crossing in generally the same location.As described in the applicant's ESEE Analysis (Exhibit C),the project incorporates a number of avoidance measures to minimize impacts to resource areas, including the special flood hazard area. This standard is met. 7. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands, and CWS permits and approvals must be obtained; and FINDING: The applicant will obtain the necessary permits from CWS,DSL,and the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers as required. The applicant submitted a standard site assessment (Exhibit H) to CWS and was issued a Service Provider Letter (Exhibit I),CWS File No. 25-002811. Permits or other approvals from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers or the Oregon Division of State Lands are not anticipated to be required,but will be obtained if necessary.This standard is met. 8. Where landform alterations or development are allowed within and adjacent to the special flood hazard area, the city will require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the special flood hazard area in PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 19 OF 43 compliance with the comprehensive plan.This area must include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian or bicycle pathway within the special flood hazard area in compliance with the adopted Transportation System Plan or Greenways Trail System Master Plan. FINDING:The proposed landform alterations within the special flood hazard area are necessary for the proposed RRFB crossing, which will provide safer conditions for the Fanno Creek Trail at SW Hall Blvd.The Fanno Creek Trail is already constructed within the project area and no other trails are identified on the City's Trail System Master Plan that fall within the project area. Construction of additional trails within theproject area are not anticipated. As such, additional dedication of lands within the special flood hazard area is unnecessary.This standard is met. 18.510.080 Special Provisions within Locally Significant Wetlands and Along the Tualatin River,Fanno Creek,Ball Creek, and the South Fork of Ash Creek A. In order to address the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 5 (Natural Resources) and the safe harbor provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 666-023-0030) pertaining to wetlands, all wetlands classified as significant on the City of Tigard "Wetlands and Streams Corridors Map" are protected. No land form alterations or developments are allowed within or partially within a significant wetland, except as allowed or approved in compliance with Section 18.510.100. FINDING: The subject property includes wetlands that are identified as significant wetlands on the City of Tigard'Wetlands and Stream Corridors"map and are,therefore,protected.The applicant has applied for the Plan Amendment Option in Section 18.510.100 to remove Goal 5 protections from 127 square feet (0.003 acre) of significant wetlands to allow the proposed pedestrian crossing and associated improvements. B. In order to address the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 5 (Natural Resources)and the safe harbor provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660-023-0030) pertaining to riparian corridors, a standard setback distance or vegetated corridor area, measured horizontally from and parallel to the top of the bank, is established for the Tualatin River, Fanno Creek,Ball Creek,and the South Fork of Ash Creek. 5. The standard setback distance or vegetated corridor area applies to all development proposed on property located within or partially within the vegetated corridors, except as allowed below: a. Roads,pedestrian or bike paths crossing the vegetated corridor from one side to the other in order to provide access to the sensitive area or across the sensitive area, as approved by the city in compliance with Section 18.510.070 and by CWS "Design and Construction Standards"; b. Utility or service provider infrastructure construction (i.e. storm,sanitary sewer, water,phone,gas,cable,etc.),if approved by the city and CWS; c. A pedestrian or bike path,not exceeding 10 feet in width and in compliance with the CWS "Design and Construction Standards"; d. Grading for the purpose of enhancing the vegetated corridor, as approved by the city and CWS; PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 20 OF 43 e. Measures to remove or abate hazards,nuisances, or fire and life safety violations, as approved by the regulating jurisdiction; f. Enhancement of the vegetated corridor for water quality or quantity benefits, fish, or wildlife habitat, as approved by the city and CWS; g. Measures to repair,maintain, alter,remove, add to, or replace existing structures, roadways,driveways,utilities, accessory uses, or other developments provided they are in compliance with city and CWS regulations, and do not encroach further into the vegetated corridor or sensitive area than allowed by the CWS "Design and Construction Standards." FINDING: The project consists of a replacement pedestrian crossing that has been designed in compliance with CWS "Design and Construction Standards." The project area does not contain any vegetated corridor areas associated with Fanno Creek that are not a part of a mapped significant wetland. Therefore,the standard setback and vegetated corridor area associated with Fanno Creek does not apply. 18.510.100 Plan Amendment Option A. Comprehensive plan amendment.Any owner of property affected by the Goal 5 safeharbor(1)protection of significant wetlands or(2)vegetated areas established for the Tualatin River,Fanno Creek, Ball Creek, and the South Fork of Ash Creek may apply for a comprehensive plan amendment as provided in Chapter 18.790,Text and Map Amendments.This amendment must be based on a specific development proposal.The effect of the amendment would be to remove Goal 5 protection from the property,but not to remove the requirements related to the CWS Stormwater Connection Permit, which must be addressed separately through an alternatives analysis, as described in Section 3.02.5 of the CWS"Design and Construction Standards."The applicant must demonstrate that such an amendment is justified by either of the following: B. ESEE analysis.The applicant may prepare an environmental,social,economic and energy(ESEE) consequences analysis prepared in compliance with OAR 660-23-040. FINDING: The applicant has chosen to demonstrate the amendment is justified through an ESEE analysis, rather than a demonstration that the wetlands are not significant. The applicant submitted an ESEE analysis dated October 2025 (Exhibit C) prepared in compliance with OAR 60-23-040,to justify removal of Goal 5 protection from approximately 127 square feet(0.003 acre)of significant wetlands and vegetated corridor associated with Fanno Creek on the subject property. 1. The analysis must consider the ESEE consequences of allowing the proposed conflicting use,considering both the impacts on the specific resource site and the comparison with other comparable sites within the Tigard Planning Area; FINDING: As described in the ESEE analysis (Exhibit C), the applicant has considered the consequences of allowing the proposed conflicting use,in this case the proposed replacement pedestrian crossing, and has considered the impacts on the specific resource site as well as other comparable sites within Tigard. As described in the applicant's analysis, the consequences of allowing the proposed conflicting use provide a net positive benefit by providing a safer pedestrian-activated RRFB crossing with curb ramps and improved signage and lighting.Since the proposal is specific to replacing an existing crossing, there are no comparable sites within the Tigard Planning Area that can provide an alternative site with fewer impacts.This standard is met. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 21 OF 43 2. The ESEE analysis must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city council that the adverse economic consequences of not allowing the conflicting use are sufficient to justify the loss, or partial loss, of the resource; FINDING:The ESEE analysis provided by the applicant demonstrates that the economic consequences of not allowing the conflicting use would be negative.The following is identified within Section 3.1 of the ESEE Analysis regarding the adverse economic consequences of not allowing the conflicting use: • The vegetated corridor areas proposed to be impacted are in a degraded state so the economic benefit of fully protecting them is minimal. • The proposed new safer RRFB crossing is not able to be constructed without the stormwater management infrastructure. If the Fanno Creek Trail is seen as unsafe because of the existing crossing,Tigard's perceived livability could be harmed,thereby limiting Tigard's economic vitality. • ODOT is proposing a fee-in-lieu payment for stormwater treatment obligations,which will help fund regional stormwater management projects,such as stream enhancements,system improvements,treatment facility upgrades,and maintenance of existing systems. Prohibiting the conflicting use means this benefit would not be provided. For these reasons, prohibiting the conflicting use would result in negative economic consequences from impacts to perceived livability and less funds for regional stormwater management projects. Alternatively, preserving the minimal area proposed to impacted would have few benefits due to its degraded state.This standard is met. 3. In particular, ESEE analysis must demonstrate why the use cannot be located on buildable land, consistent with the provisions of this chapter, and that there are no other sites within the Tigard Planning Area that can meet the specific needs of the proposed use; FINDING: The conflicting use (construction of a replacement pedestrian crossing)is an improvement that is critical to the safe operation of the existing Fanno Creek Trail and SW Hall Blvd facilities. The crossing must connect with existing alignments of the trail on both sides of SW Hall Blvd, meaning the crossing needs to be constructed in generally the same location as the existing crossing.As the project is specific in location,there are no other sites within the Tigard Planning Area that can meet the specific needs of the proposed use.This standard is met. 4. The ESEE analysis must be prepared by a team consisting of a wildlife biologist or wetlands ecologist and a land use planner or land use attorney, all of whom are qualified in their respective fields and experienced in the preparation of Goal 5 ESEE analysis; FINDING: A qualified team consisting of land use planners, wetland scientists, and ecologists, all qualified in their respective fields with experience compiling such analyses, prepared the ESEE analysis submitted with this application as Exhibit C.This standard is met. 5. If the application is approved,then the ESEE analysis must be incorporated by reference into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan,and the "Tigard Wetland and Stream Corridor Map"be amended to remove the site from the inventory. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 22 OF 43 FINDING: On approval of this request, the ESEE analysis will be incorporated by reference into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and the "Tigard Wetland and Stream Corridor Map"will be amended to remove the site from the inventory. 18.790 TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENTS A. Approval process. 2. A quasi-judicial comprehensive plan map amendment application is processed through a Type III-Modified procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.090,which is decided by the City Council with a recommendation by Planning Commission. FINDING:The applicant is proposing to impact sensitive lands,including significant wetlands,Fanno Creek, and the associated vegetated corridors to allow the proposed pedestrian crossing. Per Section 18.510.100,this protection can only be removed through a comprehensive plan map amendment.As such,this application is being reviewed through the Type III-Modified procedure. B. Approval criteria.A recommendation or decision for a quasi-judicial zoning map amendment or quasi-judicial comprehensive plan amendment will be based on the following: 1. Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations; and FINDING:The proposal demonstrates compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations,as described above. 2. Demonstration that adequate public services exist to serve the property at the intensity of proposed zoning.Factors to consider include the projected service demands of the property,the ability of the existing and proposed public services to accommodate the future use, and the characteristics of the property and development proposal,if any. FINDING:The proposed project will replace the existing pedestrian crossing of the Fanno Creek Trail across SW Hall Blvd with a safer pedestrian-activated RRFB crossing.Associated improvements are also proposed within the project area,including new stormwater outfalls,paving,curb ramps,signage and new roadway lighting. Rather than increasing demand on public facilities, the proposed project is replacing and improving existing public facilities in order to meet current public demand. The proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan in order to remove the"significant"designation from wetlands and vegetated corridor areas impacted by the project will have minimal impact on public services or demand for public services.This criterion is met. 18.910 IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.910.030 Streets A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 23 OF 43 2. No development shall occur unless streets within the development meet the standards of this chapter. 3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter, provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this chapter are constructed adjacent to the development. 4. Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall meet the standards of this chapter. The proposal is for new ramp crossings along SW Hall Blvd (Beaverton-Tualatin Highway) between Fanno Creek and SW Omara St. SW Hall Blvd is classified as a three-lane arterial street. B. Creation of rights-of-way for streets and related purposes. Rights-of-way shall be created through the approval of a final plat; however, the council may approve the creation of a street by acceptance of a deed,provided that such street is deemed essential by the council for the purpose of general traffic circulation. 1. The council may approve the creation of a street by deed of dedication without full compliance with the regulations applicable to subdivisions or partitions if any one or more of the following conditions are found by the council to be present: a. Establishment of a street is initiated by the council and is found to be essential for the purpose of general traffic circulation, and partitioning or subdivision of land has an incidental effect rather than being the primary objective in establishing the road or street for public use;or b. The tract in which the road or street is to be dedicated is an isolated ownership of 1 acre or less and such dedication is recommended by the commission to the council based on a finding that the proposal is not an attempt to evade the provisions of this title governing the control of subdivisions or partitions c. The street is located within the mixed use central business district (MU-CBD) zone and has been identified on Figures 5-14A through 5-14I of the City of Tigard 2035 Transportation System Plan as a required connectivity improvement. 2. With each application for approval of a road or street right-of-way not in full compliance with the regulations applicable to the standards, the proposed dedication shall be made a condition of subdivision and partition approval. a. The applicant shall submit such additional information and justification as may be necessary to enable the commission in its review to determine whether or not a recommendation for approval by the council shall be made. b. The recommendation,if any,shall be based upon a finding that the proposal is not in conflict with the purpose of this title. c. The commission in submitting the proposal with a recommendation to the council may attach conditions which are necessary to preserve the standards of this title. 3. All deeds of dedication shall be in a form prescribed by the city and shall name "the public" as grantee. Additional right-of-way dedication is not required for the addition and replacement of pedestrian ramps. This standard does not apply. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 24 OF 43 C. Creation of access easements. The approval authority may approve an access easement established by deed without full compliance with this chapter provided such an easement is the only reasonable method by which a lot large enough to develop can be created. 1. Access easements shall be provided and maintained in compliance with the Oregon Fire Code, Section 503. 2. Access shall be in compliance with Subsections 18.920.030.H, I, and J. The proposal does not require an access easement. This standard does not apply. D. Street location,width and grade. Except as noted below, the location,width and grade of all streets shall conform to an approved street plan and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographic conditions, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets: 1. Street grades shall be approved by the City Engineer in compliance with Subsection 18.910.030.N;and The proposed development is adjacent to SW Hall Blvd, existing streets and the street grades will remain unchanged.This standard does not apply. 2. Where the location of a street is not shown in an approved street plan,the arrangement of streets in a development shall either: a. Provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing streets in the surrounding areas, or b. Conform to a plan adopted by the commission, if it is impractical to conform to existing street patterns because of particular topographical or other existing conditions of the land. Such a plan shall be based on the type of land use to be served, the volume of traffic, the capacity of adjoining streets and the need for public convenience and safety. The site plans show the location of all existing streets. The plans submitted indicate the final design will comply with standards design requirements for the cross section,width,and grade. This standard is met. E. Minimum rights-of-way and street widths. Unless otherwise indicated on an approved street plan, or as needed to continue an existing improved street or within the Tigard Downtown Plan District,street right-of-way and roadway widths shall not be less than the minimum width described below. Where a range is indicated, the width shall be determined by the decision-making authority based upon anticipated average daily traffic (ADT) on the new street segment. (The city council may adopt by resolution, design standards for street construction and other public improvements. The design standards will provide guidance for determining improvement requirements within the specified ranges.)These are provided in Table 18.910.1. The approval authority shall make its decision about desired right-of-way width and pavement width of the various street types within the subdivision or development after consideration of the following: PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 25 OF 43 1. The type of road as provided in the comprehensive plan transportation chapter - functional street classification. 2. Anticipated traffic generation. 3. On-street parking needs. 4. Sidewalk and bikeway requirements. 5. Requirements for placement of utilities. 6. Street lighting. 7. Drainage and slope impacts. 8. Street tree location. 9. Planting and landscape areas. 10. Safety and comfort for motorists,bicyclists, and pedestrians. 11. Access needs for emergency vehicles. Additional right-of-way dedication is not required for the addition and replacement of pedestrian ramps. This standard does not apply. F. Future street plan and extension of streets. 1. A future street plan shall: a. Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other lots within 530 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division. At the applicant's request,the city may prepare a future streets proposal. Costs of the city preparing a future streets proposal shall be reimbursed for the time involved. A street proposal may be modified when subsequent subdivision proposals are submitted. b. Identify existing or proposed bus routes,pullouts or other transit facilities,bicycle routes and pedestrian facilities on or within 530 feet of the site. A subdivision or partition is not proposed. This standard does not apply. 2. Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed,and a. These extended streets or street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sac since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. b. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer,the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. c. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub street in excess of 150 feet in length. Street extension or cul-de-sacs are not proposed or deemed necessary. This standard does not apply. G. Street spacing and access management. Refer to 18.920.030.H. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 26 OF 43 Street spacing and access management is discussed under Chapter 18.920, Access, Egress, and Circulation. However, as new accesses are not proposed, this standard, as well as 18.920, does not apply. H. Street alignment and connections. 1. Full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1,1995 which preclude street connections.A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. 2. All local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is considered precluded when it is not possible to redesign or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15 percent for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. 3. Proposed street or street extensions shall be located to provide direct access to existing or planned transit stops,commercial services, and other neighborhood facilities,such as schools, shopping areas and parks. 4. All developments should provide an internal network of connecting streets that provide short, direct travel routes and minimize travel distances within the development. Street extensions are not proposed or deemed necessary.This standard does not apply. I. Intersection angles. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect at an angle as near to a right angle as practicable,except where topography requires a lesser angle,but in no case shall the angle be less than 75°unless there is special intersection design, and: 1. Streets shall have at least 25 feet of tangent adjacent to the right-of-way intersection unless topography requires a lesser distance; 2. Intersections which are not at right angles shall have a minimum corner radius of 20 feet along the right-of-way lines of the acute angle; and 3. Right-of-way lines at intersection with arterial streets shall have a corner radius of not less than 20 feet. New street intersections are not proposed.This standard does not apply. J. Existing rights-of-way. Whenever existing rights-of-way adjacent to or within a tract are of less than standard width, additional rights-of-way shall be provided at the time of subdivision or development. Additional right-of-way dedication on SW Hall Blvd will not be required to accommodate the required improvements. This standard does not apply. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 27 OF 43 K. Partial street improvements. Partial street improvements resulting in a pavement width of less than 20 feet, while generally not acceptable, may be approved where essential to reasonable development when in conformity with the other requirements of these regulations, and when it will be practical to require the improvement of the other half when the adjoining property developed. Partial street improvements are not proposed or deemed necessary.This standard does not apply. L. Cul-de-sacs.A cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: 1. All cul-de-sac shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular shall be approved by the City Engineer; and 2. The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured from the centerline intersection point of the 2 streets to the radius point of the bulb. 3. If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long,a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the city. Cul-de-sacs are not proposed or deemed necessary.This standard does not apply. M. Street names. No street name shall be used which will duplicate or be confused with the names of existing streets in Washington County,except for extensions of existing streets. Street names and numbers shall conform to the established pattern in the surrounding area and as approved by the City Engineer. New street names are not proposed or deemed necessary.This standard does not apply. N. Grades and curves. 1. Grades shall not exceed 10 percent on arterials, 12 percent on collector streets, or 12 percent on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15 percent for distances of no greater than 250 feet); and 2. Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The proposed development is adjacent to SW Hall Blvd,an existing street. The street and the grades of the street will remain unchanged. This standard does not apply. O. Curbs,curb cuts,ramps,and driveway approaches.Concrete curbs,curb cuts,wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in compliance with standards specified in this chapter and Chapter 15.04,Work in the Right-of-Way, and: 1. Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except: 2. Where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval; and 3. Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to city configuration standards. Curbs, curb cuts,and ramps are shown on the submitted site plans,but driveway approaches are not proposed. This standard is met. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 28 OF 43 P. Streets adjacent to railroad right-of-way.Wherever the proposed development contains or is adjacent to a railroad right-of-way, provision shall be made for a street approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a distance suitable for the appropriate use of the land. The distance shall be determined with due consideration at cross streets or the minimum distance required for approach grades and to provide sufficient depth to allow screen planting along the railroad right-of-way in nonindustrial areas. The site is not adjacent to any railroad right-of-way.This standard does not apply. Q. Access to arterials and collectors.Where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts.The design shall include any of the following: 1. A parallel access street along the arterial or collector; 2. Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; 3. Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a nonaccess reservation along the arterial or collector;or 4. Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; 5. If a lot has access to 2 streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The proposed improvements are along SW Hall Blvd,which is classified as an arterial street,but no accesses are proposed. This standard does not apply. R. Alleys,public or private. 1. Alleys shall be no less than 20 feet in width. In commercial and industrial zones,alleys shall be provided unless other permanent provisions for access to off-street parking and loading facilities are made. 2. While alley intersections and sharp changes in alignment shall be avoided,the corners of necessary alley intersections shall have a radius of not less than 12 feet. Alleys are not proposed or deemed necessary.This standard does not apply. S. Survey monuments.Upon completion of a street improvement and prior to acceptance by the city, it shall be the responsibility of the developer's registered professional land surveyor to provide certification to the city that all boundary and interior monuments shall be reestablished and protected. All boundary,internal monuments,and street monuments must be protected in accordance with the City's and County's requirements and standards. T. Private streets. 1. Design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer;and 2. The city shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets,such as a recorded maintenance agreement. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 29 OF 43 3. Private streets serving more than 6 dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, cottage cluster, courtyard units, and apartment developments. Private streets are not proposed or deemed necessary.This standard does not apply U. Railroad crossings.Where an adjacent development results in a need to install or improve a railroad crossing, the cost for such improvements may be a condition of development approval,or another equitable means of cost distribution shall be determined by the public works director and approved by the commission. Railroad crossings are not proposed or deemed necessary.This standard does not apply V. Street signs. The city shall install all street signs, relative to traffic control and street names, as specified by the City Engineer for any development.The cost of signs shall be the responsibility of the developer. Street signs are not proposed or deemed necessary.This standard does not apply. W. Mailboxes.Joint mailbox facilities shall be provided in all residential developments,with each joint mailbox serving at least 2 dwelling units. 1. Joint mailbox structures shall be placed adjacent to roadway curbs; 2. Proposed locations of joint mailboxes shall be designated on the preliminary plat or development plan, and shall be approved by the City Engineer/U.S. Post Office prior to final plan approval; and 3. Plans for the joint mailbox structures to be used shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer/U.S. Post Office prior to final approval. Residential development is not proposed.This standard does not apply. X. Traffic signals. The location of traffic signals shall be noted on approved street plans. Where a proposed street intersection will result in an immediate need for a traffic signal, a signal meeting approved specifications shall be installed.The cost shall be included as a condition of development. Traffic signals are not proposed or deemed necessary.This standard does not apply. Y. Street light standards. Street lights shall be installed in compliance with regulations adopted by the city's direction. A preliminary lighting plan has been submitted and meets the applicable standards.The following conditions of approval are required to meet this standard: • Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must provide a final photometric analysis of the proposed development frontages for the review and approval. Photometric analysis will follow the recommended values and requirements described in ANSI/IESNA. The PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 30 OF 43 analysis must show the location of streetlights;and the type and color of the pole and light fixture.All public streetlights must be PGE Option B. With conditions of approval, this standard is met. Z. Street name signs.Street name signs shall be installed at all street intersections.Stop signs and other signs may be required. Street name signs are not proposed or deemed necessary.This standard does not apply AA. Street cross-sections. The final lift of asphalt concrete pavement shall be placed on all new constructed public roadways prior to final city acceptance of the roadway and within 1 year of the conditional acceptance of the roadway unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.The final lift shall also be placed no later than when 90 percent of the structures in the new development are completed or 3 years from the commencement of initial construction of the development,whichever is less. 1. Sub-base and leveling course shall be of select crushed rock; 2. Surface material shall be of Class C or B asphaltic concrete; 3. The final lift shall be placed on all new construction roadways prior to city final acceptance of the roadway;however,not before 90 percent of the structures in the new development are completed unless 3 years have elapsed since initiation of construction in the development; 4. The final lift shall be Class C asphaltic concrete as defined by A.P.W.A. standard specifications; and 5. No lift shall be less than 1.5 inches in thickness. No new public roadways are proposed. This standard does not apply. BB. Traffic calming. When, in the opinion of the City Engineer, the proposed development will create a negative traffic condition on existing neighborhood streets,such as excessive speeding, the developer may be required to provide traffic calming measures. These measures may be required within the development or offsite as deemed appropriate. As an alternative,the developer may be required to deposit funds with the city to help pay for traffic calming measures that become necessary once the development is occupied and the City Engineer determines that the additional traffic from the development has triggered the need for traffic calming measures. The City Engineer will determine the amount of funds required and will collect said funds from the developer prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or in the case of subdivision,prior to the approval of the final plat. The funds will be held by the city for a period of 5 years from the date of issuance of certificate of occupancy, or in the case of a subdivision, the date of final plat approval.Any funds not used by the city within the 5-year time period will be refunded to the developer. The intent of these public improvements are to provide traffic calming. This standard is met. CC.Traffic study. 1. A traffic study shall be required for all new or expanded uses or developments under any of the following circumstances: PLANNING COMIVIISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 31 OF 43 a. When they generate a 10 percent or greater increase in existing traffic to high collision intersections identified by Washington County. b. Trip generations from development onto the city street at the point of access and the existing ADT fall within the following ranges: Existing ADT ADT to be added by development 0-3,000 vpd 2,000 vpd 3,001-6,000 vpd 1,000 vpd _ >6,000 vpd 500 vpd or more c. If any of the following issues become evident to the City Engineer: i. High traffic volumes on the adjacent roadway that may affect movement into or out of the site. ii. Lack of existing left-turn lanes onto the adjacent roadway at the proposed access drive. iii. Inadequate horizontal or vertical sight distance at access points. iv. The proximity of the proposed access to other existing drives or intersections is a potential hazard. v. The proposal requires a conditional use permit or involves a drive-through operation. vi. The proposed development may result in excessive traffic volumes on adjacent local streets. 2. In addition, a traffic study may be required for all new or expanded uses or developments under any of the following circumstances a. When the site is within 500 feet of an ODOT facility; or b. Trip generation from a development adds 300 or more vehicle trips per day to an ODOT facility;or c. Trip generation from a development adds 50 or more peak hour trips to an ODOT facility. The proposed improvements will improve pedestrian access,but will not increase the amount of traffic on SW Hall Blvd. This standard does not apply. 18.910.040 Blocks A. Block design.The length,width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. B. Sizes. 1. The perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the centerline of the streets except: a. Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands, significant habitat areas or bodies of water,or pre-existing development; or b. For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, collectors or railroads. c. For nonresidential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 32 OF 43 2. Bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or rights-of-way shall be provided when full street connection is exempted by Paragraph 18.910.040.B.1.Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. The development does not propose any new streets and does not warrant a block design or future street plan. Street or pedestrian connections are precluded by pre-existing development surrounding the proposed development. This standard is met. 18.910.050 Easements A. Easements. Easements for sewers, drainage, water mains, electric lines or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a development is traversed by a watercourse or drainageway, there shall be provided a stormwater easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of the watercourse. B. Utility easements. A property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements with the city, the applicable district, and each utility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the development.The city's standard width for public main line utility easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district, or City Engineer. The proposed development is not traversed by a watercourse or drainage way. No additional easement or right-of-way dedication is required. This standard does not apply. 18.910.070 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks. All public and private streets adjacent to industrially zoned properties shall have sidewalks meeting city standards along at least one side of the street.All other public and private streets shall have sidewalks meeting city standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if an adjoining street has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development,even if no sidewalk exists on the other side of the street. As shown on the preliminary site plan, sidewalks exist and the proposal is to improve pedestrian crossings. This standard does not apply. B. Requirement of developers. 1. As part of any development proposal or change in use resulting in an additional 1,000 vehicle trips or more per day,an applicant shall be required to identify direct,safe(1.25 x the straight line distance)pedestrian routes within 0.50 miles of their site to all transit facilities and neighborhood activity centers(schools,parks,libraries,etc.).In addition, the developer may be required to participate in the removal of any gaps in the pedestrian system off-site if justified by the development. 2. If there is an existing sidewalk on the same side of the street as the development within 300 feet of a development site in either direction, the sidewalk shall be extended from the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality (even if the sidewalk does not serve a neighborhood activity center). PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 33 OF 43 The proposed development does not result in an additional 1,000 vehicle trips or more per day.There is existing sidewalk along SW Hall Blvd.This standard does not apply. C. Planter strip requirements. A planter strip separation of at least 5 feet between the curb and the sidewalk shall be required in the design of streets, except where the following conditions exist:there is inadequate right-of-way;the curbside sidewalks already exist on predominant portions of the street;it would conflict with the utilities;there are significant natural features (large trees, water features, significant habitat areas, etc.) that would be destroyed if the sidewalk were located as required; or where there are existing structures in close proximity to the street (15 feet or less) or where the standards in Table 18.910.1 specify otherwise. Additional consideration for exempting the planter strip requirement may be given on a case-by-case basis if a property abuts more than one street frontage. Curb-tight sidewalk exists. This standard does not apply. D. Maintenance. Maintenance of sidewalks, curbs, and planter strips is the continuing obligation of the adjacent property owner. SW Hall Blvd is a public roadway that is and will remain the maintenance responsibility of ODOT. This standard is applicable. E. Application for permit and inspection. Separate street opening permits are required for sidewalk segments that are not part of a current subdivision approval: 1. An occupancy permit shall not be issued for a development until the provisions of this section are satisfied. 2. The City Engineer may issue a permit and certificate allowing temporary noncompliance with the provisions of this section to the owner, builder or contractor when, in his or her opinion, the construction of the sidewalk is impractical for one or more of the following reasons: a. Sidewalk grades have not and cannot be established for the property in question within a reasonable length of time; b. Forthcoming installation of public utilities or street paving would be likely to cause severe damage to the new sidewalk; c. Street right-of-way is insufficient to accommodate a sidewalk on 1 or both sides of the street;or d. Topography or elevation of the sidewalk base area makes construction of a sidewalk impractical or economically infeasible 3. The City Engineer shall inspect the construction of sidewalks for compliance with the provision set forth in the standard specifications manual. Improvements associated with public infrastructure including street and right-of-way dedication, utilities,grading,water quality and quantity facilities, streetlights,easements,easement locations,and utility connections must be designed in accordance with the following codes and standards: • City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards • Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards • City of Tigard Community Development Codes and Municipal Codes PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 34 OF 43 • Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) Fire Codes • Other applicable County,State,and Federal Codes and Standard Guidelines The following conditions of approval are required to meet this standard: • Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must obtain approval of a Public Facility Improvement(PFI) Permit to cover all improvements associated with public infrastructure work,including stormwater management facilities, or any other work in the public right-of-way. An Engineering cost estimate of improvements associated with public infrastructures including but not limited to street, street grading.utilities, stormwater quality and water quantity facilities,sanitary sewer,streetlights,and franchise utilities are required at the time of PFI permit submittal. When the water system is under the City of Tigard jurisdiction,an Engineering cost estimate of water improvement must be listed as a separate line item from the total cost estimate. With conditions of approval,this standard is met. 18.910.090 Sanitary Sewers A. Sewers required. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in compliance with Clean Water Services requirements and the-comprehensive plan. B. Sewer plan approval. The City Engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to issuance of development permits involving sewer service. C. Over-sizing. Proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the comprehensive plan. D. Permits denied. Development permits may be restricted by the approval authority where a deficiency exists in the existing sewer system or portion thereof which cannot be rectified within the development and which if not rectified will result in a threat to public health or safety, surcharging of existing mains, or violations of state or federal standards pertaining to operation of the sewage treatment system. The applicant does not propose any facilities that would require sanitary sewer service. This standard does not apply. 18.910.100 Storm Drainage A. General provisions.The Director and City Engineer shall issue a development permit only where adequate provisions for stormwater and floodwater runoff have been made,and: 1. The storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary sewerage system; 2. Where possible, inlets shall be provided so surface water is not carried across any intersection or allowed to flood any street; and 3. Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown on every development proposal plan. B. Easements.Where a development is traversed by a watercourse,drainageway,channel or stream, there shall be provided a stormwater easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of such watercourse and such further width as will be adequate for conveyance and maintenance. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 35 OF 43 The applicant has provided a Stormwater Design Report (dated December 1, 2025) stating that providing water quality and hydromodification is not feasible and requesting to pay a fee in-lieu of stormwater management. Inlets are provided so surface water is not carried across any intersection. Surface water drainage patterns are shown on the development proposal plan. C. Accommodation of upstream drainage. A culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area,whether inside or outside the development,and the City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility,based on Clean Water Services requirements. D. Effect on downstream drainage. Where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the director and engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in compliance with Clean Water Services requirements. A preliminary storm drainage report in preliminary accordance with City of Tigard and CWS standards was submitted as part of the land use submittal. The applicant has stated that providing water quality and hydromodification is not feasible and requests to pay a fee in-lieu of stormwater management,per CWS Standards. The following conditions of approval are required to meet this standard: • Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must submit site plans and a final storm drainage report for approval indicating how run-off generated by the development will be collected, conveyed,treated,and detained. The storm drainage report must be prepared and include a maintenance plan in accordance with CWS Design and Construction Standards and the City of Tigard Standards. • Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must obtain a CWS Stormwater Connection Authorization prior to issuance of the City of Tigard PH Permit. Plans must be submitted to the City of Tigard for review. The City will forward plans and the storm drainage report to CWS after preliminary review for CWS's review and approval. • Prior to final acceptance,the applicant must submit a two years of maintenance assurance for all required public improvements and enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement with the City. Through conditions of approval,this standard is met. 18.910.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1. As a standard, bike lanes shall be required along all arterial and collector routes and where identified on the city's adopted bicycle plan in the transportation system plan (TSP). Bike lane requirements along collectors within the downtown urban renewal district shall be determined by the City Engineer unless specified in Table 18.910.1. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 36 OF 43 2. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the city's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or rights-of-way, provided such dedication is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. 3. Any new street improvement project shall include bicycle lanes as required in this chapter and on the adopted bicycle plan. B. Cost of construction.Development permits issued for planned developments,conditional use permits,subdivisions and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements in an amount roughly proportional to the impact of the development. C. Minimum width. 1. The minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is 5 feet per bicycle travel lane. 2. The minimum width for multi-use paths separated from the road and classified as regional or community trails in the Greenway Trail System Master Plan is 10 feet.The width may be reduced to 8 feet if there are environmental or other constraints. 3. The minimum width for off-street paths classified as neighborhood trails, according to the Greenway Trail System Master Plan,is 3 feet. 4. Design standards for bike and pedestrian-ways shall be determined by the City Engineer. The proposed improvements are for the crossing of Fanno Creek Trail at SW Hall Blvd. This standard does not apply. 18.910.120 Utilities A. Underground utilities. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication,lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction,high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: 1. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; 2. The city reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; 3. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and 4. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. B. Information on development plans. The applicant for a development shall show on the development plan or in the explanatory information,easements for all underground utility facilities, and 1. Plans showing the location of all underground facilities as described herein shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval; and 2. Care shall be taken in all cases to ensure that above ground equipment does not obstruct vision clearance areas for vehicular traffic. C. Exception to undergrounding requirement. 1. The developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 37 OF 43 will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of undergrounding in conjunction with the development.The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which undergrounding would result in the placement of additional poles,rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. 2. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 3. Properties within the MU-CBD zone shall be exempt from the requirements for undergrounding of utility lines and from the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 4. The exceptions in Paragraphs 18.910.120.C.1 through 3 shall apply only to existing utility lines.All new utility lines shall be placed underground. D. Fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 1. The City Engineer shall establish utility service areas in the city. All development which occurs within a utility service area shall pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding for utilities if the development does not provide underground utilities, unless exempted by this chapter. 2. The City Engineer shall establish the fee by utility service area which shall be determined based upon the estimated cost to underground utilities within each service area. The total estimated cost for undergrounding in a service area shall be allocated on a front-foot basis to each party within the service area. The fee due from any developer shall be calculated based on a front-foot basis. 3. A developer shall receive a credit against the fee for costs incurred in the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities.The City Engineer shall determine the amount of the credit, after review of cost information submitted by the applicant with the request for credit. 4. The funds collected in each service area shall be used for undergrounding utilities within the city at large.The City Engineer shall prepare and maintain a list of proposed undergrounding projects which may be funded with the fees collected by the city.The list shall indicate the estimated timing and cost of each project. The list shall be submitted to the city council for their review and approval annually. The proposal is for limited improvements at pedestrian crossings. This standard does not apply. 18.910.130 Cash or Bond Required A. Guarantee. All improvements installed by the developer shall be guaranteed as to workmanship and material for a period of 1 year following acceptance by the city council. B. Cash deposit or bond. Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City Engineer. C. Compliance requirements. The cash or bond shall comply with the terms and conditions of Section 18.830.070. The applicant is required to submit a bond for all improvements.The following conditions of approval are required to meet this standard: PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 38 OF 43 • Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant must provide a performance bond for all public improvements facilities associated with the development. • Prior to final acceptance,the applicant must complete all improvements associated with public infrastructure under the City and CWS jurisdiction. Public infrastructure includes,but is not limited to,street improvements,streetlights,street trees,sidewalks,public and private stormwater management facilities,sanitary sewer,water,natural gas,electrical,and telecommunication.The applicant must receive conditional acceptance from the City of Tigard. • Prior to final acceptance,the applicant must submit a two years of maintenance assurance for all required public improvements and enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement with the City. Through the conditions of approval, this standard is met. 18.910.140 Monuments—Replacement Required Any monuments that are disturbed before all improvements are completed by the subdivider shall be replaced prior to final acceptance of the improvements. The applicant's narrative has acknowledged intent to comply with this requirement. It is feasible and possible to meet this standard through the PFI permitting process. 18.910.150 Installation Prerequisite A. Approval required. No public improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans have been approved by the city,permit fee paid, and permit issued. B. Permit fee.The permit fee is required to defray the cost and expenses incurred by the city for construction and other services in connection with the improvement. The permit fee shall be set by council resolution. The applicant's narrative has acknowledged intent to comply with this requirement. It is feasible and possible to meet this standard through the PFI permitting process. 18.910.160 Reserved 18.910.170 Plan Check A. Submittal requirements. Work shall not begin until construction plans and construction estimates have been submitted and checked for adequacy and approved by the City Engineer in writing. The developer can obtain detailed information about submittal requirements from the City Engineer. B. Compliance.All such plans shall be prepared in compliance with requirements of the city. The applicant must submit a permit for review and approval for all public improvements. All plans must be in compliance with all applicable standards. The following conditions of approval are required to meet this standard: PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 39 OF 43 Improvements associated with public infrastructure including street and right-of-way dedication, utilities,grading,water quality and quantity facilities,streetlights,easements, easement locations,and utility connections must be designed in accordance with the following codes and standards: • City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards • Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards • City of Tigard Community Development Codes and Municipal Codes • Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) Fire Codes • Other applicable County,State,and Federal Codes and Standard Guidelines • Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must obtain approval of a Public Facility Improvement(PFI) Permit to cover all improvements associated with public infrastructure work,including stormwater management facilities,or any other work in the public right-of-way. An Engineering cost estimate of improvements associated with public infrastructures including but not limited to street, street grading.utilities, stormwater quality and water quantity facilities,sanitary sewer. streetlights,and franchise utilities are required at the time of PFI permit submittal. When the water system is under the City of Tigard jurisdiction,an Engineering cost estimate of water improvement must be listed as a separate line item from the total cost estimate. • Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must submit the exact legal name, address,and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the"Permittee",and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. Specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership,LLC,etc. and the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. • Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must submit a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking must be provided onsite. Parking construction vehicles or equipment on adjacent residential public streets is prohibited. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application and must include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. Through the conditions of approval,this standard is met. CHAPTER 18.920 ACCESS,EGRESS,AND CIRCULATION 18.920.020 Applicability A. Applicability.The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures,the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use that increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or changes the access requirements. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 40 OF 43 The proposal is not for new development or modification to existing development.This chapter does not apply. CHAPTER 18.930 VISION CLEARANCE AREAS 18.930.020 Applicability A. Applicability.The provisions of this chapter apply to all development,including the construction of new structures,the remodeling of existing structures,and to a change of use that increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or changes the access requirements. B. When site development review is not required.Where the provisions of Chapter 18.780,Site Development Review,do not apply,the approval authority will approve,approve with conditions,or deny a plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter through a Type I procedure,as provided in Section 18.710.050,using the standards in this chapter. The proposal is not for new development or modification to existing development. This chapter does not apply. ADDITIONAL CITY OR AGENCY COMMENTS: Public Water System: The existing public water mains are under the jurisdiction of the City of Tigard,with a 6-inch ductile iron waterline in SW Hall Blvd south of SW Omara Street. There is also a 12-inch ductile iron waterline in SW Hall Blvd north and south of SW Omara Street. No water services or waterline extensions are proposed. This standard does not apply. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management regulations established by CWS Design and Construction which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. In addition, a maintenance plan must be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. • Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant must obtain a CWS Stormwater Connection Authorization prior to issuance of the City of Tigard PH Permit. Plans must be submitted to the City of Tigard for review. The City will forward plans and the storm drainage report to CWS after preliminary review for CWS's review and approval. Through the condition of approval,this standard is met. Grading and Erosion Control: The City of Tigard and Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must submit an erosion control plan for approval. The plan must comply to the "CWS Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual" (current edition). PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 41 OF 43 The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. The area of disturbance is less than one acre.The following conditions of approval are required to meet this standard: • Prior to commencing any site improvements,the applicant must obtain an approved Erosion&Sediment Control (ESC) permit. • Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant must submit a final grading plan showing the existing and proposed contours for approval. The plan must detail the provisions for surface drainage of all lots and show that they will be graded to ensure that surface drainage is directed to the street or a public storm drainage system approved by the Engineering Division. The design engineer must indicate areas that will have natural slopes between 10 percent and 20 percent,as well as areas that will have natural slopes in excess of 20 percent. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections or permits will be necessary. Through the conditions of approval, this standard is met. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The following City of Tigard staff were sent a copy of the proposal: • Development Engineering • Building Division • Public Works • Transportation Planning • Police Department Comments from Development Engineering have been incorporated throughout this report. No other comments were received from other staff. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services issued a Service Provider Letter (CWS file 25-002811) for this proposal on November 18,2025,and determined that mitigation is not required for the proposed stormwater outfalls in the vegetated corridor as they are each under 100 square feet. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was sent a copy of the applicant's proposal and responded on December 15,2025 that they do not have any comments. SECTION IX. ANALYSIS, CONCLUSION,AND RECOMMENDATION ANALYSIS: As shown in the analysis above,the applicant's ESEE analysis addresses the requirements of the Tigard Development Code, Chapter 18.510 Sensitive Lands. The subject property contains locally significant wetlands and vegetated corridors protected under Goal 5 safe harbor. The applicant has applied for a quasi-judicial comprehensive plan amendment under a Type III-Modified procedure.The application is PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 42 OF 43 based on a specific development of replacement of the existing Fanno Creek Trail crossing over SW Hall Blvd.The applicant has demonstrated that such an amendment is justified by an ESEE analysis consistent with OAR 660-23-040. The ESEE analysis concludes that allowing the conflicting use of the replacement crossing and associated utilities would result in the most positive consequences of the decision options.A decision to allow the conflicting use will avoid many of the negative consequences attributed to prohibiting the conflicting uses.Through the application of site design and development standards to conflicting uses,the impacts on the significant wetland can be minimized,and the payment of a fee-in-lieu will allow off-site resource areas to be enhanced. Allowing the conflicting use offers the most benefit to the city by advancing a needed transportation safety project that also provides improved stormwater management, especially since the vegetated corridor proposed to be impacted has been determined to be in a degraded condition. For this reason,the positive consequences of preserving these areas would be minimal as opposed to the significant environmental,social,economic,and energy benefits achieved by the proposal. CONCLUSION As demonstrated by the findings above,the Planning Commission finds,by a 7-0 vote in favor,that the proposed comprehensive plan map amendment and sensitive lands review comply with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals,applicable regional, state,and federal regulations,the Tigard Comprehensive Plan,and applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. The Planning Commission recommends approval to the Tigard City Council of the proposed comprehensive plan map amendment and sensitive lands review. ( February 1 2026 PREPARED BY: Jen McGinnis Associate Planner RECOMMENDED: THE 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 BY THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION. Nathan Jackson,Planning Commission President Dated this 12th day of February 2026. Attachments: Attachment 1:Site Plan Attachment 2:Plan Set Attachment 3:Applicant's ESEE Analysis PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CMA2025-0003/SLR2025-0002 FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAGE 43 OF 43 Preliminary Site Plan Attachment 1 y ♦.r ti I. N it. A HALL ewo Irr_ `°' v E 3 i Erg ,,�`t�`c . N': ` ^. ) . .\ n a� �1' Oa .�- �:. i a t 0 5. 3' ll'i* „,. i IV � V` a I I I i 10 I E : 00 0 4UWUU141U RfI � aoI A r R 311Q 1'RRn ai 3-g g _ � a � §. 1 d 15 if R � , � - �< a 2 2 E sN � � d a i W8 ? 41 F (5)lg k g a.if i i .- Z a a Cr f a, Pr 1 8i Z a 2 Attachment 2 »v_»> INDEX OF SHEETS STATE OF OREGON „o A01 Title Sheet PLANS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT _ ► �y a, _� .•,.,.�,.0 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION T 'f � _ SHEET N0. DESCRIPTION C wvm c— O ,,,,•� _A02 Index Of Sheets Cont.&Std.Dm Nos T ADO! Survey Control Data 9 ••- r1-1 . O / DRAINAGE, PAVING, CURB RAMPS,SIGNING, ILLUMINATION,AND SIGNALS "9° ,°' WW""� rtit OR 141 (SW HALL BLVD): FANNO CREEK TRAIL - ,..tte..„,s •° = 0.' SW OMARA ST PROJECT Overall Length Of Project-0.29 Mlles BEAVERTON -TUALATIN HIGHWAY ATTENTION: Oregon Law Requires You To Follow Rules Adopted By The Oregon Utility Notification Center. WASHINGTON COUNTY Those Rules Are Set Forth In OAR 952-001-0001 Through OAR 952 001 0100. MARCH 2O26 You May Obtain Copies Of The Rules By Calling The Center(Note:The Telephone Number For The Oregon Utility Notification Center Is in (503)232-19821. n �..., w .,.r,o�`,. ��� I '4VD Y • r'�LETS ALL 3 W I ;e ^•'WORRTOGETHER3e • N U , - opWeer 'e' TO MARE THIS ��, AMR CfiNTEqF 4 kxy _ia. F�" Q I R BnNrmUe .?F•• JOB SAFE F o:Ea' dyR 1°� ` Y rai�"� "' . I e e5npN BT `'.':4°.+F'r;�'r`'3�''rf,4.'‘ qA > m 110 • aIl1EAVFRTOy,r GlmcuMn P9A • SUM s I1 _'Ai g H dr.o ql ♦•,1 BEGINNING OF PROJECT 1° I•mo,. B � � `� 14 `v•mN H H e" ` STA. "ML" 132+90(M.P. 5.59) _„ ) A8nra y 9r ;` - DFNNEy DeroiN Madewoa • ao OREGON TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION o 4' TNO g,- 9oaeft,•�� � ¢_' I 0 Tulle Brown CHAIR RO a •r ' g Oa Lee OeYer VICE CHAIR R0 > 1{j' 0.e P. PH II Chang COMMISSIONER R eauB OMRO.two -RMOR ST'� eLonemoe u' • Allcla ChaOman COMMISSIONER R R0- Rq 1 • rrWll" ler Baker COMMISSIONER _ WEIR Robnaon / •MSag.l '_ 1/ krImopher W.Strickler DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION m • ,FOC These plans were developed using ODOT design standards. of - TeRL > • s OAK or ce VOMONA s Exceptions to these standards,If any,have been submitted Bt vo 'ph otoenbulg '3B A 9r and approved by the ODOT Chief Engineer or their delegated a `>� t authority. T• 1f:._: > O ' M-.4:'4FFB. Jee S. UGH` Be §i �W- f r'� 11 6 0 - 3AP N Approving Authority: 9E St Signature&dale i • A.-�' �. PANKOW", P Elizabe[h Papadopoulos,PE 4p- " i Tech Center Manager Region I END OF PROJECT W R° } "Y P Print name and title > ,[ 9ATTLen K 411,94, 4Bynt I' STA. "ML" 148+00(M.P. 5.88) t yeo °°R 40U T.25.,R.IW.,W.M. .' eo aAF Concurrence by ODOT Chief Engineer r — . RM°Cm 'R•N c4:Oo9 - g a I 'a a w AR' , OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- o } .rt"� ai 6a , recddna _ a : gpmAM, 1- ' SWOMARASTPROJECT o Lj BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY 1. a -iir' 0 WASHINGTON COUNTY `` • Ili FEDERAL HIGHWAY PROJECT NUMBER SHEET a 2 ADMINISTRATIONNO HO R a. .4'SPOT PZ`O OREGON DIVISION 7365(019) A01 R K23509 re OI.dgn A01 10(23/2025 8'28'01 AM hwyel li FINALA UBLENONNII„DOCUMENT ?Al_??? List of standard drawings INDEX OF SHEETS,CONT. RD300-Trench Backlit!,Bedding,Pipe Zone and Multiple Installations TMS00-Pavement Marking Standard Detail Blocks SHEET NO. I DESCRIPTION RD302-Street Cut TM503-Pavement Marking Standard Detail Blocks ROADWAY DETAILS R0317-Culvert Embankment Protection and Riprap Pads TMSI S-Pavement Markers RD335-Standard Storm Sewer Manhole 774510-Durable Pavement Markings Method'A'&Method'D'Surface Installed Profiled BAOI-BA02 Typical Sections R0336-Standard Manhole Details TM530-Intersection Pavement Markings(Crosswalk,Stop Bar&Bike Lane Stencil) BCOI thru Curb Ramp Details RD339-Pipe To Structure Connections TM560-Alignment Layout General BCOB Incl. R0345-Pipe to Manhole Connections 7M629-Slip Base And Fixed Base Luminaire Supports General Derails And Design Criteria BDOI Pipe Data R0356-Manhole Covers and Frames TM630-Shp Base Luminaire Supports Base Plate&Footing Details R0358-Manhole Slope Protectors T14631-Fixed Base Luminaire Supports Base Plate&Footing Details ROADWAY CONSTRUC77ON(Main Line) R0360-Manhole Frame Adjustment TM635-Breakaway Sign&Luminaire Supports-Support Location Guidelines COI General Construction R0363-Gutter Transition At Inlet TM671-3 Second Cost Wind Speed Map COl A Drainage and Utilities R0364-Concrete Inlets Type L-1,G-2,L-ZM,&G-2MA TM676-Sign Attachments R0365-Frames&Grates for Concrete Inlets TM681-Perforated Steel Square Tube(P557)Sign Support Installation COS General Construction RD371-Concrete Inlet Base Type CC-3 TM687-Perforated Steel Square Tube(PS577 Anchor Foundation CO2A Drainage and Utilities RD372-Concrete Inlet Top,Option I Type CC-3 TM68B-Perforated Steel Square Tube(PS57)Slip Base Foundation CO3 General Construction R0376-Miscellaneous Drainage Structures Siphon Box,Inlet Cap&Inlet Adjustment TM800-Tables,Abrupt Edge and PCMS Details CO3A Drainage and Utilities R0386-Fill Height Table for Circular Concrete Pipe 714820-Temporary Barricades CO3B Drainage Profile R0388-Fill Height Tables for PVC Pipe TM821-Temporary Sign Supports RD700-Curbs TM822-Temporary Sign Supports TRAFFIC CONTROL RD705-Islands 731841-Intersection Work Zone Details EBOI thru Traffic Control Details R0707-Island Nose Treatments 714844-Temporary Pedestrian Accessible Routing EB04 Incl. R0710-Accessible Route Islands TM845-Tempo ary Sidewalk Ramps EROSION CONTROL R0720-Curb Line Sidewalks TM855-2-Lane,2-Way Roadway R0721-Separated Sidewalks FB07 Erosion and Sediment Control Details R0722-Sidewalk Joints and Transition Panels FB02 thru Erosion and Sediment Control Plan RD900-Curb Ramp Components And Legend FB04 Ind. R0901-Curb Ramp Legend And Corner Identification RD902-Detectable Warning Surface Details HYDRAULIC RD904-Detectable Warning Surface Placement For Curb Ramps R..W Map No.-10B-I-10 HA01 I Stormwater Plan _ RD906-Detectable Warning Surface Placement For Accessible Route Island R0910-Perpendicular Curb Ramp SIGNS RD920 Parallel Curb Ramp LAOI Sign Installation Plan TM200-Sign Installation Details LB01 Sign Details TM20I-Miscellaneous Sign Placement Details LCOI Sign&Post Data Table TM223-Street Name Sign Layout TM240-Crosswalk Closure Detail SIGNALS TM450-Mast Arm Pole Details MAOI Legend TM457-Pedestal Foundation and Traffic Signal Assembly MB01 Flashing Beacon Plan TM462 Vehicle Signal Bracket&Sign Bracket(Type B)Details MB02 Existing Utilities MCOI Flashing Beacon Plan TM466-Radar Mounting Derails MCO2 Existing Utilities TM467-Pedestrian Signal Mount And Pedestrian Pushbutton Details MD01 Signal Plan TM470-was&Cab/e Installation MEOI MEO2 Details TM471-Trenching&Conduit Installation TM472-Junction Boxes/Nand Holes TM482-Controller Cabinet&Service Cabinet Foundation Details _ PERMANENT PAVEMENT MARKINGS TM485-Service Cabinet Wiring Details QA0I I Pavement Marking Plan TM493-Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon(RRFB)Assemblies YAIppM 4 ' a,' �i. D OR141(SW HALLBLVD):FANNOCREEK TRAIL- O + •�r SWT N-TUSTTINOIGHT BEAVEW SN-GTON C U HIGHWAY 2 wasnlnOTory couNTr A'Sp0RIN FEDERAL HIGHWAY PROJECT MOWER SHEET ADMINISTRATION NO. Standard Drawings located on the web at OREGON http.//wwworegon.goviODOTIEngineering,PagesiStandardSaSpx I DIVISION SEE SHEET A01 A02 R-K23509_cs_Ol.dgn::A02 10/2412025 9:24:03 AM hwyel Ii ELECTRONIC DOCursNT FINAL UPON REQUEST ??V_??? Var. 72'to 7.5' I ACP wearing course rp A=Level3, ti"PG64-22 11 11 Nom.rhkn.-2.5' 1 I` CPPR LNom.depth-2.5' STA. "ML" 138+13.84 To STA. "ML" 138+51.15 0.50' Var.8.0'-13.0' Var. _ •/3.0' Var. t^0.50' 1 ...8.0' 7.50'-11.50' I_ Var. ACP base course r "11.50'-7.50' 1.5' 2' ACP base course Level3, �i'PC64-22 2' 1.S' Level3, li"PC69-72 Nom.thko.-3.5" P.0 cone sidewalk-4'thkn. 1 Nom.thl n.-3.5' 2' ACP wearing course ACP wearing course PC64-22 Level3, �i" Level3, ri'PC64-27 n Nom.rhkn.-2.5" om.rhkn.-2.5' 51 I,SXmax. / d_ SL 7.5%max, Sawcur *11>� hkn. CPPR Sawcuf Y.C.cone sidewalk-4'r/kn. Aggregate base-4't //J Nam.depth-1.5'� L CPPR Aggregate base-4'fhkn, Aggregate base-12'rhkn.J _Nom.depth-2.S' Aggregate base-12-rhkn. STA. "ML" 137+83.93 To STA. "ML" 137+98.86 STA. "ML" 137+89.21 To STA. "ML" 137+97.05 * "ML" 137+98.86 To "ML" 138+01.86 * "ML" 137+97.05 To "ML" 138+04.05 ** "ML" 138+01.86 To "ML" 138+13.84 ** "ML" 138+04.05 To "ML" 138+14.54 *** "ML" 138+14.54 To "ML" 138+34.13 _ Vol.3.6'to 2' WV s ,,..___ _ 7.5 _....1` Var. Var.11.5'to 11' 12' Var. 9.6'-12'nom. - I- - 9.1'-13'nom. 1 ACP base course I NOTELevelNom.3,rhkn%i.-3."PC65'-21 I.5/de-slopes are shown as wt.to hod,. P.C.coot.sidewalk-4'thkn. ACP wearing course J7 Level3, Y'PC64-22 Nom.rhkn.-2.S" 1 SL 1.5%max. 51_as I sawcur ,<���,D PROF6f/ OREGON DEPARTMENT ti4 Aggregate base-4'thkn. 1 II-� Caldplanepavemenfrcmoval DVS YNGINf' .corn OF TRANSPORTATION .�: Aggregate base-12*rhkn.J Nom.depth-2.5' e//// 93 - STA. 11ML" 137+46.90 TO STA. "ML" 138+51.15 lip OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- SW OMARA ST PROJECT 1 BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY 1 WASHINOTON COUNTY • •'` 14•ZOC.) Onpner NemoSwuNw4e Rn4cwerBMn Me, �qN BUS N �. wed:G,e� SHEET NO. RENEWS: 12-31-2026 TYPICAL SECTIONS BA01 "AEEUCONC°0UMEM LK23509_ty_01.dgn::BA01 10/23/2025 8:28:49 AM hwyel1i AVAILABLE REQUEST. »V—»? 0.50' 0.50' V Var. Var. Var. ACP base course ACP base cours Leve13, V,-PC64-22 Level3, k'PC64-22 1.5' 2' Nom.thkn.-3.5" Nom.thkn.-3.5' 2' 1.5' P.C.conc.sidewalk-4'thkn. ACP wearing course ACP weanng coins• Level 3, ,'PC64-22 Level 3, i'PC64-22 Nom.rhkn.-2.5" Nom.thkn.-2.5" EIxtg.sidewalk 5L 7.5%max. SL I.S%max>� ilr — Sawcut Sawrut OMMIMOM P.0 cony.sidewalk-4"thkn. Aggregate base-4•thkn. 1 I CPPR I 7IW Aggregate base-4'thkn. Aggregate base-12 rhkn. Nom.depth-2.5' Nom.depth-2.5" Aggregate base-12'thkn. I STA. "ML" 143+35 TO STA. "ML" 143+75 STA. "ML" 143+35 To STA. "ML" 143+75 "ML" 144+00 TO STA. "ML" 144+08 au• 4 ,� Var.6'-10' _ 11.5' __ Var. I Var. 11.5' Var.6'-6' '7 i '7 ACP wearing course Level 3, 1,'PC64-22 I Nam.rhkn.-2.5" i I NOTE.' 1.Side-slopes are shown as vert.to hortz. c Cold plane pavement removal NOT.depth-2.5' STA. "ML" 140+80 To STA. "ML" 143+00 „ * "ML" 143+00 To "ML" 144+28 jO PROf�f OREGON DEPARTMENT �, GINS ,04, OF TRANSPORTATION `� 93� OR 141(SW HALL B LVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- � $ SW OMARA ST PROJECT • 1 BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY WASHINGTON COUNTY • . 14,2O l.O D,Sts K.5,,.Sn,,Ma, RS n,,:Brbn NW7"N BU\NV n"e.r.m .Nea.. Oveloy,Swdoss HMNG RENEWS: 12-31-2026 TYPICAL SECTIONS sBA02 flNN R.K23509_ty_01.dgn::BA02 10/23/2025 8:28:50 AM hwyel1i LAIAL IRON DOWMEN( »y_»> See general note 3 I 6' Indicates standard curb, ( nfor reoee only, seeee general notess 2 1 and 3) I I Cutter line I LEGEND W I Cont :raion joint Counter I xx,xxxx,,xx.xx slope ' PC xxxxx ` Station,offset,elevation, I.S% 1= E-X' 1 curb exposure point k. e . . I. o o eo I n� Ramp number I e . o o DEXXX' Design exception component(Approved) Df ,KYX% Soft scape Aggr.base CURB RUNNING SLOPE-I-5% Th a kn.-4' ,i Rock soft scape OPTION"A" � �%+ See eneral note 3 6. Indicates standard curb, 7BC (Shown for reference only, Cutter line see general notes3)2 and 3) TBC _BfC_:j. -1 Counter I4.1 Contraction joint Cr, slope 4.. I W 40 I, Ramp run slope I 4.0% vat.L S% S%-ZBala ^ I e e e e e le e o 0 o , e I1 e - Arrows to point downward o 0 0 o a.% r% Ram p ti Aggr.base �J Ramp Thkn.-4" CURB RUNNING SLOPE-4% SLOPE DIRECTION OPTION°B" ,IyED Iirs OREGON DEPARTMENT o r `% ( PRO \ ?`(-" ,y9 OF TRANSPORTATION ,`` GENERAL NOTES FOR ALL DETAILS 935 OR 141(SWHALLBLVD):FANNOCREEKTRAIL- l.curb project E'=0'TD ire Vary as shown SW OMARA ST PROJECT on project plans,or as directed. BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY 2.See dwg.no.R0700,and project plans,for •`;I., Q1^ WASHINOTON COUNTY curb details. 1 4,1 G BU` Q o�z,."°N°n Sepulveda ...NA BA."go 3.Width to march adjacent gutter pan,if present. 1/Al N o.erter w.v.o0b r ra ®Bct 4.For profile and cross slope,see project plans. No SHEET NO. RENEWS: 12-31-2026 CURB RAMP DETAILS BC01 FL K23509_dL01.dgn::BC01 10/23/2025 8:28:53 AM hwyel li NA AIUBLI 1 VIOLAN O KNOUT OR141(SW HALL BLVD)(WASHINGTON COUNTY) ??V-??? Sec.2,T.02S.,RO1W.,W.M. 9 9 9- -9 9 9 9 9 9 RI - ' BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (OR141) (SW HALL BLVD.) / `\/ 4, w- � -- ice/- -- - °e \- ly \Saurrut / Curb arMBttter p n o *it, v o^ \ - _- ' \ / Uo , 0 _` \ \`/ a Y `V , �mo o' / - idT /sox. �\ \ox o:�. 0 4 II • `4- ` 6.00'- ...it V d r -.map, -6.O0, - "CR01"CURB RAMP ,�f/ 2.00% zzjr.:' a;; 0 dB Dag.sitter (for location,see sht COI) t� L (,Trensldon panel ;?; '•SBX .O ; �. c, 7.SOx © b- :00 © 4 Mitch Fxtg.CuONt Q N" aN 4 © a 1/41 'Qri� ` 0 N^ l4J7SCALE:1"=5' x lJ`�`'1\1 ^ 1//- N ry�Tnnsltlon panels6.00' ' /200' 12.00 ^- G00' ` t I 200X 0.12x J➢ '^ /,SQK" O.SAIt 233x FEET - 1 x' KN./s Concrete sl//ficl/!g Match EXt9.SLOB$ � .' * . c. 7 I W be removed Location Station C20/" Offset(h) Elevation(ft) Description Exposure -?9 j�/\i(�6' � r J ® 10+00.00 0.00' 145.21 Gutter 0.62 / `\ ® 10+06.00 0.00' 145.38 Gutter 0.58 Preserve and protectcabinet foundation © 10+18.87 0.00' 145.65 Gutter 0.00 OD 10+30.87 0.00' 145.80 Gutter 0.00 ® 10+43.74 0.00' /45.58 Cutter 0.58 Location Station C.1L01" Offset(h) Elevation(ft) Description Exposure OE /0+49.74 0.00' /45.70 Gutter 0.58 © 10+18.87 12.083 /46.12 BoW N/A © 10+00.00 0.583' 145.83 TBoC N/A ® 10+30.87 12.083' 146.27 BoW N/A REFERENCE NOTE: ON 10+06.00 0.583' /45.96 TBoC N/A For additional legend and curb ramp details, OS 10+43.74 8.083' 146.32 BoW N/A see dwgs.R0900 and RD90/. O/ 10+18.87 0.583' 145.66 TBoC N/A OT 10+49.74 8.083' 146.36 BOW N/A OE910N°We°ON d. ,. p 10+30.87 0.583' 145.81 TBoC N/A - 000000D EKED PROFS f OREGON DEPARTMENT ,_ OK /0+43.74 0.583' 146.23 TBOC N/A mama // GIN�y OF TRANSPORTATION '.,`� © 10+49.74 0.583' 146.28 TBoC N/A .BM No 93 M® 10+18.87 6.583' 146.05 SW N/A 14100100 ` 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNOCREEKTRAIL- SW OMARA ST PROJECT p 10+30.87 6.583' 146.20 SW N/A ^^i•i BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY MR:OAP .`` \ WASHINGTON COUNTY ® 10+00.00 B.033' 146.19 8oW N/A NNE posNnN • 1 4,2� Oa.=Katrina SepNNeE. P.m,Brien N{o © 10+06.00 8.083' 146.05 BoW N/A 1 61N RU1 N!- 005er 0.055...d Checker Sue don RAMP NO. SHEET NO. 1 RENEWS: 12-31-2026 CURB RAMP DETAILS BCO2 R-K23509 dL01.dgn::BCO2 10/23/2025 8:28:53 AM hwyel li pwuv�e UPON IRCOUCOr" OR141(SW HALL BLVD)(WASHINGTON COUNTY) ??V_??? Sec.2,T.02S.,RO1W.,W.M. Ex19•R/W Ext9.R/W Z-4Mt location Station 9C1L02' OHset(!t) Elevation(It) Description Exposure AO 10+00.00 0.00' 145.67 Gutter 0.46 O 10+09.00 0.00' 145.73 Gutter 0.58 © 10+25.00 0.00' 145.83 Cutter 0.00 \ DO 10+37.00 0.00' 145.76 Cutter 0.00 / \ OE 10+46.83 0.00' 145.47 Gutter 0.58 / \ OF 10+00.00 0.583' 146.13 Thor N/A r_-1 I \ 010+09.00 0583' 14631 TBoC N/A i O I / Q OH 10+25.00 0583' 145.84 Mot N/A O s 0I *:�� -_ Match Dag.sidewalk �® 1 10+37.00 0583' I 145.77 MC N/A - .12.0Q'- _ _ -•- 15.00' 9.00' (fJ 10+46.83 0.583' 146.05 TBOC N/A i 1.61% 05 2.13% 3.33% O 10+25.00 5.583' 145.99 SW N/A 1 O 10+37.00 5583' 145.92 SW N/A tl t ro `Transition Panel If 7 0 y p $ p O 10+00.00 8.583' 14589 BoW N/A 4 g C u I ON 10+0900 BS83' 14679 BoW N/A • "o "' g 4- «< o N pO I 10+25.00 12.583' 145.87 BOW I N/A Mun,Eats. 5 O ,i. 0 0 © c March Extg.curb o Q O 10+37.00 12.523' 145.80 BoW N/A U^ March Gut. 1e d00' •.. 12.00' 15.OD' © l0+46.B3 85B3' /4593 BoW N/A ® ¢ 0 - "a s.,•__ OSB% �� 2.1.it1t 900' Odin s $. I' to -�d.- - �.oftn - $i.•0n -�- 0e1n7.00 - O -3 n 3n I�-•il 34. 0 30 m'3no �3n n-'' _ 3R• _ _ -5-0---1-3 n_ �� $ r ••••�•i„' © / cob and gutter Q IQ 01 9� 5, mom+ , :.:s:••r l b�qb �� B �A1• , �2 out ti \ J- 0d1n - O ;Od In 1- 8 E n SCALE:1"=5' \�� g•< N � � Sawrut REFERENCE NOTE =___ _Al _- For additional legend and curb ramp details, 'AlN ---- a --- see dwgs.R0900 and R0901. 5 2.5 0 5 FEET DESIGN OLLFAION OREGON DEPARTMENT 1 i" CROSSING CLOSURE (-----pGINEft4,1.010. OF TRANSPORTATIONwA Z`BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (OR141) 14100100 ®` OR141(SW HALL K1 BLVD):FANNOCREERAIL- (Sw HALL BLVD.) SWOMARASTPROJECT NVM.141 BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY "CR0211 CURB RAMP MP:FA9 o.,, WASHINGTON COUNT( (For location,see sht.GOl) COMER 4,2 Q 2 lq N�' O ND , D �.«� N BUS MN !INM,. 1 RENEWS: 12-31-2026 CURB RAMP DETAILS BC03 "AUooUR_K23509_d_01.dgn::BC03 10/23/2025 8:28:54 AM hotel II VILABBLE PONoa 0R141(SW HALL BLVD)(WASHINGTON COUNTY) ??V-??? ec. , . .M. z Location Station YR_03' Offset(f) Elevation 00 Description Exposure AO 10+00.00 000' 149.20 Gutter 0.00' BO 10+05.00 0.00' 149.30 Gutter 0.00' ' OC 10+75.00 00O' 749.59 Gutter 0.70' ' 0 10+00.00 0.583' 149.21 MC N/A 0 0 0 R OE 10+05.00 0.583' 749.31 MC N/A Match Extg.sidewalk OF 70+15.00 0.583' 150.19 76oC N/A Extg.A/W Extg.R/W O 10+00.00 6 583' 749.65 SW N/A 5.00' 8.00' 5.00' 7.20% 6.50% 2.00% ON 70+05.00 6.583' 749.71 SW N/A 010+00.00 11.583' 149.72 SW N/A o-� 010+05.00 II.583' 149.7E SW N/A g V % 3 3 $ KO 10+00.00 16.SB3' 'saw SW N/A 4' �' �'� 070+05.00 16583' 750.13 SW N/A MO 10+12.80 16583' 150.66 SW N/A O 10+17.97 16.583' 150.75 SW N/A 5.00' 5.00' O 10+00.00 24.583' 150.18 BOW N/A 650X M.80% y Match Dag,sAdIMW / O70+05.00 24.583' 750.24 BoW N/A 0 g 1O / . . © 70+77.98 24.603' 750.76 BOW N/A 0 "KI "2j, ® 10+12.98 24.603' 150.86 BOW N/A 5.00' o- 5.00' 1.20% o- /Match Extg.Gutter =K. l o ' •A" F A 1 : Z .< \ Match Extg.sldelw/k 5.00' 10.00' 2.00% 8.40% I SCALE:1"=5' REFERENCE NOTE y --� -------.4-. -- -0A --- For additional legend and curb ramp details, , 8 Q I c e o see dwgs.RD900 and R0901. 5 2.5 FEET 5 --ti _.Ia w% OrSNN ucEPnQN b 0000000 PROF OREGON DEPARTMENT 3°i;h N/A 'c�'S��NO INF Eff�0y9 OF TRANSPORTATION ` cNossxQ aosuac Paving limits B EAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (OR141) cno,o 93 AW- (SW HALL BLVD.) 14100100 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNOCREEKTRAIL- SW OMARA ST PROJECT NW us BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY MW too • ...� ` WASHINGTON COUNTY "CR03"CURB RAMP CORNER P " "4NIB.LI‘NC,O MemoN .�°N"°. "140 (For location,see sht.CO2) RAMP NO. ' Sxrrf NQ. 1&2 RENEWS: 12-31-2026 CURB RAMP DETAILS BCO4 ft_K23509_dLOI.dgn::BCO4 10/23l2025 8:28:55 AM hwyel 1i FINALAvuunLE UPONi REQ n i 0R141(SW HALL BLVD)(WASHINGTON COUNTY) ??V-??? Sec.2,T.025.,RO4W.,W.M. BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (0R141) fz Location Stetion'O104' OffsetDT) Elevation(ft) Desc,,pt/on Exposure SW HALL BLVD. -------- ---�-- _ AO L0+00.00 0.00' 155.72 Gutter 0.29' L.T. March Dag.Gutter $ RI y�P q NI 0 10+10.00 0.00' 155.32 Gutter 0.50' Op 0 - p 0 -� © -- ---' --- OC 10+22.00 0.00' 155.13 Gutter 0.50' >jO .\ \� ® OO 10+28.93 0.00' 155.06 Gutter 0.00' 5.00' 9.22' S,•• .53' `0� \\ OE /0+3531 0.00' 154.70 Gutter 0.25' 0 L90%may- 3.9AK rr:(F:0' �� 1.87% - • \ LJ iP `` L. \ OE 10+42.78 0.00' /54.52 Gutter 0.25' Match Curb el'} 0 ~ \ ' P �• `© \ OG 10+51.31 0.00' 154.35 Gutter 0.00' -.N sl O g Ni �' Ni $,{p 2} \ ON 10+56.31 0.00' 154.31 Gutter 0.00' w; Q d \ f�_� b',`, O \\` \ el \ p/ 10+65.53 0.00' 154.15 Gutter 0.50' Eet9• S,fO. ,,,.111 ��, \ Match sidewalk f f�, _1 5.00'S�� � O ``\ \ ;; O 10+70.52 0.00' 154.05 Gutter 0.50' el 3.47% 0.80% F s 6d :y\� 0 \�', O 10+00.00 0.583' 155.01 TBoC N/A I .Q vv . \ CO 10+1600 0.583' 155.82 TBoC N/A © �' 0 0 "1ij 0` _ © " \ MO lO+Izoa 0.583' 155.14 TBoC N/A Extg.R/W W- - ;.� -"-_ - " �� :: - �1..5074 \-- ON 10+28.93 0.583' 155.07 ('SAC N/A o i--- 1 '.; O 10+35.31 0.583' 154.95 TBoC N/A O L`. •'•mo•` 1`I; 11 OP 10+42.78 0.583' 154.77 TBoC N/A cP �, : . 1 1 © 10+51.3! 0.583' 154.36 TBoC N/A ael Q u`1 1 OR 10+55..31 0.583' 154.32 TBoC N/A 6.00 •••• ♦ i;0 i WO 10+65.53 0.583' 154.64 TBoC N/A I. 00M © �i 1 I W OT 10+70.52 0.583' 154.57 TBoC N/A 0 1 Iul X��Ofl&I O 10+00.00 5.583' 156.13 BOW N/A _- ad.=20' 09•12 of Q 010+10.00 6.583' 155.88 BOW 1 N/A n I OW 10+22.00 6.583' 155.20 BoW N/A T 1111I 1 le, i 1> t p^1 ,n j I 3 O 10+2693 6.583' 155.13 BOW N/A IA Location Station CR-04• Offset(ft) Elevation(ft) Description Exposure i oll� '°' i,i Oy 10+35.31 6.583' 155.01 BoW N/A ® 10+51.31 6.583' 154.42 BoW N/A `1 b 1 I OZ I0+42.78 6.583' 154.83 BoW N/A ® I I 10+56.31 6.583' 154.38 8oW N/A ` " C lO+6S53 6.583' /59.70 BoW N/A `'1 0 B IO+70.S7 £S83' 154.76 BoW N/A 11 o a 6:00 I SCALE:1"=5' 1.00% REFERENCE NOTE 1 s For additional legend and curb ramp details, 1 1 see dwgs.R0900 and R0901. s z.s 0 5 FEET ` Z. DESNiN IXCEPnON ..• 1 00000 so vS��vNp PNOF�J�O OFGON TRANSPORTATION TMENT `, N W e CNOSSN CLOSURE • ' GI 0 t': Hi j o 50 iq N/A �, U 5.00' OW NO.A 14100100 9� 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- Match Dag.sidewalk14 2.40% K j NW SWOMARAST PROJECT H / BEAVESN WASHINGTON U HIGHWAY MP_6.80 `• • \^ COUNTY ,`1 YR_03' CORNER wsngN' .` 14'�'� 0 D®uee,:Nerve.Sepulveda Reviewer a:.e NO, "CR04"CURB RAMP to+og.00� ` _`(� co Match Extg.Curb 1 qN Blf�` Ora.:Mtg.Wane, a�rd:Sue am (For location,see sht.CO3) _ NAP NO, SHEET NO. Match Extg.Gutter 1&2 RENEWS: 12-31-2026 CURB RAMP DETAILS BC05 R_K23509_dt_01.dgn::BCOS 10/23/2025 8:28:56 AM hwyel Ii uE� 'ON MOD. OR141(SW HALL BLVD)(WASHINGTON COUNTY) ??V-??? Sec.2,T.02S.,RO1W.,W.M. BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (OR141) Z -.s` (SW HALL BLVU.) --1 0 �/ NC c i// °= 0 Location Station CR_05' Offset(ft) Elevation et) Desc Pion Exposure / gin--- ---.,. , ___________________________� - ' ' Match Extg.Gutter AO 10+00.00 0.00' 155.59 Gutter 0.66' Satww // © 10+08.99 0.00' 155.64 Gutter 0.50' /... CYrb and gul er ,O 8.99' - Match Extg.Curb © /0+17.I3 0.00' 155.71 Gutter 0.00' / - 122% YYY 0 D® 10+23.34 0.00' 155.68 Gutter 0.00• / // anel xo'p OE 10+32.24 0.00' 155.65 Gutter 0.50' / ' la 0 (Transition P "7 .n,..; Q / 6'.6* / 0 10+39.32 0.00' 155.62 Gutter 0.50' / ,p s. / Q i n$4. I - Extg.R/W- © 10+00.00 0.583' 156.25 7BoC N/A / -,ate c / / 0 ar 7,07' , Match Extg.Wawa& NO 10+08.99 0.583' 156.14 78oC N/A 0 ® rr� /,};:t 3•j1% 1EI 1 _ - - /O 10+17.13 0.583' 155.72 78oC N/A / / 0h•:f:•••:•••i • -$ 7,d 1 - - 0 10+23.34 0.583' 155.69 78oC N/A // 0 f "t:;rY _6_� - _ _ _ - -- - O 10+32.29 0.583' 156.15 (S.0 N/A -/ r _ 11 © 10+39.32 0.583' 156.12 7BoC N/A / . 1� / 6' QS� 0 ® 10+00.00 6.583' 156.42 BoW N/A ( 1 %. NO 10+08.99 6.583' 156.20 BOW N/A , / 1 y�� O 1 OO l0+17.13 6.583' 155.78 8oW N/A / / 1 , ,- O /0+23.34 6.583' 155.75 BOW N/A 0/© , Lit ro,, GS , eased © 10+32.24 6.583' 156.21 80W N/A ., / .21 1 *S , ,-'�it9. Q / '•6• i �1 - ® 10+38.22 6.563' 156.18 BoW N/A F I , past I .-'' o / i 1 y ,Z? N / ! yF - - ,8 /Match Extg.Curb .b p` ',w 1 I t I ,CS-... ,o `� 0 1 e 0$ 1 b•0. 1 f0%'79.12 I 1 SCALE:1'=5' 4qy. REFERENCE NOT% E 0 O L"'... •e3-, , for additional legend and curb ramp details, ' O` 1 see dwgs.RD900 and R0901. 5 2.5 FEET s Match bag.Gutter O,Q• 0 '1 ocsi"n o Pnon o� 2024-080.1 ,”.....,-.-......". �fitOPROFts, OREGON DEPARTMENT irilki; Moss.CLOSURE OF TRANSPORTATION I 2-2 .9 ' 'a IANI NO. I 14100100 OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREE1(TRAIL- SW OMARA ST PROJECT I BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY "CR05"CURB RAMP Nr_� �^ WASHINGTON AUNTY / a (for location,see she CO3) 14 - �O .:rcemee sewNea. RMeeec Odes xso coRNSR POSITION 2 /qN BURN Urev.MN.Yevee 55»Gm SHEETS". i&2 RENEWS: 12-31-2026 CURB RAMP DETAILS RC06 LLK23509_dL0l.dgn::BC06 10/23/2025 8:28:56 AM hwye111 "AM��LE UPON PLQ°O'6TN� OR141(SW HALL BLVD)(WASHINGTON COUNTY) ??V-??? Sec.2,T.02S.,RO1W.,W.M. n n sn n 3 n- 30- 3n- f-Z- 4111MNIC Locatlon Station CR_06' Offset(ft) Elevation(ft) Qescn'ption Exposure &I9 RAY -.- 0. &lg R/W AO 10+00.00 0.00' I5398 Cutter 0.56 ___ ( © 10+09.66 0.00' 154.10 Cutter 0.50 OC 10+17.66 0.00' 154.21 Cutter 0.00 `- - W O 10+23.17 0.00' 154.28 Curter 0.00 __ OE 10+31.17 0.00' 154.39 Cutter 0.50 O 10+41.30 0.00' 154.52 Curter 0.60 e O 10+00.00 0.50' 154.54 TBOC n/a ' W `©' 10+09.66 0.50' 154.60 TBoC n/a a • /O 10+17.66 0.50' 154.22 TBoC n/a 0 s/deNe/k _ _ 0 10+23.17 0.50' 154.29 T8oC n/a Matrh Eng.-- 0 __ O 10+31.17 0.50' 154.89 TBoC n/a _3 n 3 r70/• 0 0 O © 10+41.30 0.50' 155.12 TBoC n/a 09y;Y 3n "' O Match DV.sidewalk 10+00.00 5.23' 154.65 SW n/a &00' 3n 3n 30 3n 'tt 2.75X 1.2 5..50X f0.2f• 3 n O /0+0593 d3T IS4.61 SW n/a n C Match Extg.sldee'alk " 2.69.► --__- O 10+1766 4.50' 154.42 SW n/a - o- C `M 10+23.17 4.50 154.49 SW n/a V N V .4 0 4"' W 0 010+00.00 73.12' 154.73 8oW n/a© © ,y 0 010+09.66 7000' 154.70 BoW n/a q Oa LTransldon p el l qk p 1.27% r �M,�. _ 010+77.66 10.00 154.48 BoW n/a yg. y� © • g - g 1 © 0 Match Ertg.Curb O 10+23.17 10.00' 154.55 BOW n/a elf �E 0 ,k o?7s• 101¢ D e -;igi~ Q• , O W Match Ext Cutter O 10+31.17 10.00' 14.99 BoW n/a 9.66'Z -'' 8.00' S.50' ` 8.00' `I 10.14' g OV 10+41.30 7.78' 155.2E BoW n/a 0.62% 4.75X --1.27% a O Match Sing.Curb _- Match Extg.Cutter r 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 -I- Y y„ - 0 P S! Curb and gutter °L--- REFERENCE NOTE SCALE:1°=5' CI Sawcut For additional legend and curb ramp details, see dwgs.R0900 and R0901. 5 2.5 o s FEET DESIGN EXCEPTION 1p.ti BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (0R141) 00000-00 �ISp PROfS. OREGON DEPARTMENT ; (SW HALL BLVD.) W uMOsuNGarwRE VSLRM No. �(,INE f�O,y OF TRANSPORTATION 14100100 9M�� OR141(S S HALLO BLVD): FANNO PROJECTREEKTRAIL- "CR06R CURB RAMP RUT:yq0 .v WPC TAI. 1 B��WASHINGTON COUNTY HIGHWAYALATIN (for location,see shr.CO3) I. 14 7 2Q O CORNER POSITION DeNEper.Repine Sepulveda Reae.a:(Man Nµ 4 lqN BUk 14Or..AMMO Wade OnxNu Sue Goss RUMP NO. SHEET NO. 1 RENEWS: 12-31-2026 CURB RAMP DETAILS BC07 R_K23509_dt_01.dgn::BC07 10/23/2025 B:28:57 AM hwyeI Ii Rr u�Msc�PoNo�oGav�T"T OR141(SW HALL BLVD)(WASHINGTON COUNTY) ??V-??? Sec.2,T.02S.,R01W.,W.M. 0 0 1 // • I \\ {{I Location Station"C207" Offset(ft) Elevation(f0 1 Description Exposure • / I I 1 AOI /0+00.00 0.00' 154.84 Gutter 0.58' Ilk!' olo 0 /0+06.00 0.00' 154.78 Gutter 0.58' ,°oIo "Io / © 10,00.00 6.00' 154.83 Gutter 0.58' \ I / Ii W O 10+06.00 6.00' 154.79 Gutter 0.58' W C I O W O ^b Vy p,� O Op � BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (OR141) v3i (SW HALL BLVD.) 0 0 4111104 SE REFERENCE NOTE: For additional legend and curb ramp details, see dwgs.R0900 and R0901. SCALE:1°=5' 5 2.5 0 5 FEET "CR07"CURB RAMP DESIGN EECEvnoN ozl.4 (For location,see sht.CO3) 00000-00 ,Q,F.D PROFS f OREGON DEPARTMENT `� ,_ mosENGaosus Vk�� �G1N f 'O,y OF TRANSPORTATION .�`�,: N/A �� �9l "•w..." OM No. 14100100 4b CO OR141(SW HALL O ARA BLVD)ST N ECT��L SWNw1151 ^ BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY Ns•3.Bo .•`; O\ WASHINGTON COUNTY COSNER 1 4,2 O DoBoo,:NSepulvedaMwr.ne Sepulveda Ra Bryn no IA POWS. '1 N B U,NG [n wr.MNa Varna aemv Sue Cam. RAMP 0. SHEET NO. 1 RENEWS: 12-31-2026 CURB RAMP DETAILS BC08 R.K23509_dCp1.dgn::BC08 10/23/2025 8:28:58 AM hwyel 1i "AYuumiuwn ITE-OKN"s*"t PPE USE/INSTALLATION CRRERIA 4 �FWAL ALTERNATE MATERIALS APPURTENANCES O PIPE•ARCH TREATMENT HELICAL CORRUGATED FETAL RICO PLASTIC&W MOTS ON I MANHOLES EXTENSION AL&IAWUN OLUIMIEO OR GALVANISED WON AND STEEL mason COMC TYPE P SIZEOf CORRUOATONS SIZE OF CORRUGATIONS MO.CIRCULAR OR ELLIPTICAL ROA. nMir 2 My11:0.Rlelol,0 ORLOCN SEAM LOCK actor Rlvcre ev off LOCK LocxSeAn y K Ahmed CRORR.SRCTaE« I RT .l 11?R llr ecoin• rer UMW III?silt our slit 3501, c__��TN c !; ai' is g F 3 3 9 e 3 a 3 3 3 a AL IeR 3 M S i E Ahmed DWENs107 s W 00°""A`"'00 O NCO OO WALL OR 0 w 11- Sim IN OmIMG *Mel O C p� ': m M re a'ree �,•re@ Y `e!3 e5R E°d $ pi o e F 3 4 R cure lure vuye OP Pure PLA R lure or c $a 0 0 S go E .� E Holton : TxxN. TIWx. @ TxxN. $ $ 'Max. E MO E TIWN. A ' $ 8 p 12 EOUN C v R3e<COMSR Y f i or -- ,,..--i s.,-.;. O„olmal I•P Mwsl ,ALINE oxa,aH NNar 1 Ig in n C/ o &_ a l u 0 'N N..,: over _ 'Vi "mod o n_'b'o.c..Y I °: ' I ,I,.... o i . '1 MNpeDE E fw na.q aAol S 5' 's » cea a.. Z c TIMiItx i i Z 9 `> 1 Pure - >;; Weu R°i' - REMARKS MOTH IN PEST ''"' Pssrl l[pa u,pa S i'`e 'e i s '4a Na. 1 u g aOi g u u o 3 Txxn. to D i u e A a a'Q IFeeU Iml 9 u Naar Waal tracheal AMNsI •2> S R'A,NeU 2 00 1E V V 02 n.0 I / 4 a / • 01 MO I L___ g a 6: n _— I t rLa•+w.�1aa.,ro ew 8 TI I I I I : 17 0 1 rt,ram , IVII fl V - &a 1=0 - J aaa.a aµ a57•6 goers* I 1 I ' I I I I GENERAL NOTES: 0 Cross-sectional dimensions may vary with different PU3go Tr<ncn n.mm,IMddi9.Pipe Zoos AadM p nadlaeam Role Manhole I. A check(�I Indkates column head) Iles. materials.When galvanized Iron or steel and Arrc0.0302 `eh tip MhRi Cwnrab unl w3st IChnslik A sop Manholea qa s a Drop Connection for Manholes heading apP aluminum are acceptable alternates use a separate Encasement,uaM.and Cap DetMh ROtS. Rom line for each type of material. oa Oceall ` Kant,.or AAnnd Manhole 2. A pipe cuhrert installation shall be of 0031n h.1I op Trench Service Comeaon.el.Fh3np dManm ROisu hole Lope Norma, Ilk atedal throughout. QCros-seCIt ci shape of pipe normal to longitudinal Rolla s For Mew Moe rl%360 Manhole Ftary rame ivamrem axis,pdor to loading culvert coped EmbanMein hot..And germ Pad, .3633 Cuter Tan.,M Inn[ 3. Extension of existing metal culverts maY be o/ R =Round Arch w3ie Sloped Ends For Concrete Pipe Concrete lnleu TFpef-I.e-iia0MMNC-aslA o��4- rlik metal corrugations.For connecting E _Ellipticall6Nnaminalelan elongation/ �1+0 :::aIF�3o;"rw�,M,t;6d.M.,Lnumnpe3l., A0366 <.365 '�t:N`::;,.�:<a-I:a_: ,t�T��,O PROf�/• OREGON DEPARTMENT LL details,see Std.Dwg.No.RD326. ga 331 Payed End SlopeWith Removable safety RuhI n \ f� I� °Abbreviations for protective coatings for metal pipe = ..i'Fnd 6Ren fa Metal n,e RO o .Type M-L M-0,IIAnd 1-gt CiS �NG1N f O,y OF TRANSPORTATION ',` �� 6. Dimensions shown are nominal. ',TT, r,n,.nd6ecaonfor Consreu,wC,Hoe[6PaNp.W.ne hoe elv ''eras PM Polymeric,10 MIN.[hkn.coaled both sides pp= ou rp eerie,for cdmpaae Metu Pia R0333 Rase Type CC-3 PO -Polyethylene Inside lining,potymerk outside .326 Coupling For Corm...Maul Pipe R03T3 caret et Top.a Ip.I Type CC-3 92 5. AM pipes shall conform to the AASHTO U -Uncoated PO327 <aa ay lands For Corrugated RCM Pip. _ e inlet Top.option xrya.C6-3 sp«Iflouon 01 W,applicable for the type of material and CIM-(poop Chevron ladastrlal membrane rtR033u nor Uu rc ran Dallis _ 374 Compere c age Rasta Or Field OR 141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEKTRAIL- meelameterarme pipeIrrvolved. Ec -Epoxy Rp33p _ ono wwa Drainage3traaurn9phan.a., ) Pipedmect, om-rant,er< .66lnletAdarp„e.v column heading applies. R033a purer ,r Pia Bash.Frame ind crate BEAVERTON OMARA ST PROJECT Abbreviations for existing pipe materials RODS 3�w.e Slam s�Manhole 3e0 Type Height T.Nes For u,rmindln 6 Reel umIarm Pipe N GTON COUNTY FOOTNOTES: O R0336 la e tails Wive= Height Tables For AlumNuma Steel And Ripe • . , WASHINGTON FOOTNOTES: As Asbestos cement m333 Standard Sanitary s..a Manhole I Height Table,For AlurriNurn 6 Steel salmi Rlb Plpe a •( 01' Al Corrugated aluminum Pipe toswaare Connections l Height Table For circular concrete Pipe • I 2 !. OI Design height of cover Is the critical design CoConcrete Rpla3 Storm Sewer Pollution Contra Manhole .338 Fa Fa Height Tads Far Fret ripe NOR n ' D<ai.nr put awe Regew,timid McDonald heightM used to select pipe materials.The St �3.i Shallow IMba<;°M'_ Rp391 F HagdTablefar ComparedeO fA.KE Drafts Andla yaneM height Of rover for any given run of pipe St esCorrugatedmaterial, steel �3,a 11039) FN Height T.eie,Herigbt Table FFo SvoeNproPa%nednpe n� ITaerr.SwO® may vary.Design height of cover shall be X Other material,see remarks column Pipe a ADM Coven ID Winer SHEET No. measured to subgrade. R03,i Lasgge erecual M:m Connections ROM 3[arm.ar<,Tmarmem.nd stone.Fade Held M.ner, PIPE DATA RENEWS: 6-30-2027 BOOS RDOCUMENT H_K23509_pd_01.dgn::BD01 10/23/2025 8:29:00 AM hwyel l i VANVNVNELAIE05 00N N Q^yUCST ISec.02, T.25, R.1W, W.M. ??V-??? CONSTRUCTION NOTES 01 Construct PCC sidewalk -...m..—Z—` O Const.curb ramp,perpendicular-7 Inst Safety yellow trucated domes on new surface-24 sq.ft. (for details,see BCO2) (See dwg.Nos.R0900,R0901,and R0901) O3 Const.curb and gutter O4 Const.curb ramp,perpendicular-7 Inst.Safety yellow trucated domes on new surface-24 sq.ft. (for details,see BC03) BEGINNING OF PROJECT �� STA.'ML"11+22.33 !/ Eat Dag.R/W " + —��wr�'�I,r- )'g.o c.\ 7 / e _ ems \ --- 3n 3n z� i --�_oe 1 o-icr� - •o9elsnn ® uod in ,s� F7f ft)—=—=.x7f"_ —=l1' �17r - ® \ O + • + SOO1DT331V + . %, �—Paving limits 1 BEAVEALATIN HWY. (OR141) + + + + / (SS.W..W. HALL BLVD.) Paling knits^,4--- _y'_ ',' .—.—. CI" R/W Fang.R/W }� + I', ' J'��� ..... °'n �i:l W I: I I. I cr /, f'l Z i If/ c " E,0PROF OREGON DEPARTMENT i ~�° ,41 '' U./, �V<F'�GINf�S/0 OF TRANSPORTATION � ' 1/ /i 9� � OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- I� SW OMARA ST PROJECT PLAN /I • , B��WASHINOTON CONNTYGHWAY SCALE 7'=30' •, • 14,'I,O O 1qN au%Ns' .Navin %wale . ReNeweOw.:. n NH Sue Cron SHEET NO. RENEWS: 12-31-2026 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION COi R-K23509_p1_01.dgn::CO1 10/23/2025 8:29:05 AM hwyel 1 i a w PDX REQUEST Sec.02, T.25, R.1W, W.M. ??V-??? CONSTRUCTION NOTES 0 Sta.ML'138+26.07,Lt. Zee= Const.coot.inlet,type C-2 w/1.5'sump (For details,see slit.C01B) (See dwg.nos.RD363,RD364 S R0365) O Sta."MC 138+26.0139.59'Lt. Inst./2'ductile iron storm sew.pipe-16' 5'depth,s/1.0% �/" Inst.stone embankment-2 cu.yds. Wet/and boundary Inst.subgrade geotextile-8 sq.yds. ` (For details,see slit.C01B) \./" (See day.nos.RD300,R03178 RD3391 �j O3 Sta.MC 137+87.74,29.37'Lt. Extg.R/W �� 0 Exf9.R/W Furn ish s age.stone embankment channel-1 cu.yd. Fine grade shoulder to drain `����.� /b Q O Inst.subgrade geotext//e-Sso.yds. �,�-•r-'� 0 , ai I 0 O4 Sta.ML'137+82.07,Rt. -�--- ' ' _ =1' 3/ Inst.Con stoneembant Inlet,type kment Channel 1 cu and. 0-3 n - -.:��. I --- ,.--, - 3 h '0..1, a Furnish agg.6'-O. '� Od L R �— - �'-W 1�- -0931J00 ® • • —•—•— Inst.subgade geotextile-5.5 sq.yds. —st 0 ,0-7/ �0- M -_ ,�- -- ��_--_ 0!1 n •. - (For details,see shts.HAO/) ® / O • Paving limits 300'0773W { O Sta.;111'/t,type ha Rt. Paving limits Const.inlet,type Channel and grate t i Inst.stone embankment-1 cu.yd. 0 c %� BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (OR141) / Fumishagg.6"-0. (S.W. HALL BLVD.) / Est.subgrade gents.MAOle SS sq.yds. 0 , „0 0 / (For details,see slits.NA01) — — =—�-<——;'——--———— 6 Sta.MC 137+78 to AfC"737+89,38.59'Rt. .__© _ -1...'",:-. �=7 ,� • 0 r,- a —o e—a—e—e Relocate UC traffic signal condu/t ! li __ �J/ See slit M801 .. g • ,1■III ----- - _ CWet. `��—O7 Sta.Mt 137+80to ML"137+86.5,33.17 Rt. _ �`mi l 'I 1 I PNNp .Rom. Relocate Irrigation system OSta.ML"138+75.71,23.20'Lt. (i / Q 9 RelocateOC electric!(by others) Extg.R/W O I(� O Sta.ML'138+15.71,24.15'Lt. I Iv Relocate UC comms.(by others) y`�- �- �- \ �" LEGEND --4'- (Items in legend may not appear on plans) '-�- ;tI ��.- N. Remove manhole. 1{EtN�baundAry tI I' Adjust manhole- 0 ,t 11 Const manhole: O t:1 Y /t Remove Inlet BI t tI W t Adjust Inlet O t I V It Const.manhole • tt I It Const,manhole with Inlet: O t t I Z It Cap.manhole/inlet 0/o �tI 2 II Const pipe: f4I 'a Ill (brut per..dais pipe (i3)PROFL OREGON DEPARTMENT •v,4•J t Remove pipe: it �.1,f'/ j�I Insc paved cubert end slope: a �p1GIN f �y OF TRANSPORTATION `•, Inst.stormwater/D marker: y 9l Stone embankment _ 92 PLAN "'"�'" OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- SCALE1-3o Ditch. = = 1 SWOMARASTPROJECT No Work area: '• ti BEAVERTON WASHINGTON COUNTY HIGHWAY Regulated work area: I I •` 1 ZO Doneel Wetland boundary- 1 'OE A K�J� .0 Moo RENEWS: 6-30-2027 DRAINAGE&UTILITIES ASSET FINAL ueiPONmH_K23509_dr-01.dgn::CO IA 10/23/2025 8:29:07 AM hwyel I vuU REQUEST ??V-??? /so- -150 cots® 14L•138.26.07,Lt. Type C-2'in/et w/1.5'sump F.L.out-143.70(E 127 Proposed ground 4k pipe CL £xt9.ground I pipe CL- I C018® 14C 1384-26.01,Lt. Install stone embankment outfall �\ ^� F.L.out=143.54'(E 127 745- \ I -145 \ Extg.R/WL/ne IVVY/ 1.OX nom, Stone embankment Iautfa//-2 cu.yds. 140- -140 0+00 Stationing(R.1 10+00 Profile Along Existing Culvert STA"ML"138+26.07 TO"ML"138+26.01 NOR/Z.SCALE 1 -20' ev .yk %OS)PROFS OREGON DEPARTMENT � GINE�� OF TRANSPORTATION 92 B s 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- SW OMARASTPROJECT BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY o,, WASHINGTON COUNTY • 20 SeNO McDonald OEA0 =ad Kew uo Reviewer SHEET NO. RENEWS: 6-30-2027 PROFILE Co113 DOCUMENT H_K23509_pf_01.dgn::Cal B 10/23/2025 8,29:10 AM hwyel 1 i RN.ELECTRONS UPON REQUEST Sec.02, T.2S, R.1W, W.M. ??V-??? CONSTRUCTION NOTES OConst.curb and gutter Z—en1111MIC O Const.PEE sidewalk OConti,curb ramp,perpendicular-1 Inst.Safety yellow trurated domes on new surface-10 sq.ft. k• (For details,see BC04)� �1Lea d ©` 3 Fxtg.R/W =Pr k l iv 3R \3:/7 3 3 3 O .� I -It. t ® W ,MN O —M b— MQ1 o J I I , BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY.;(OR141) ' • . — —e—s(S.W. HALL BLVD.) I �HHng 9mm W J to `F� 0 0E 0E 0E uE •.1E— Dag.R/W o \ Extg.R/W zy or ���ED PROP6 OREGON DEPARTMENT ae �VS��N�W f O,`9 OF TRANSPORTATION ,�' / 93j iP- OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEKTRAIL- SW OMARA ST PROJECT PLANWASHINGTON COUNTY '; "-;� BEAVERTON-TUAIATIN HIGHWAY 0 BM f41N BU%N(' a V re Mocker Sue Oeg SHUT NO.— RENEWS: 12-31-2026 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CO2 R-K23509_pl_01.dgn::CO2 10/23/2025 8:29:13 AM hwyel 1 i Nwt t "ONC1PON DOCUMENT ME• AV4WiLL ONC DOREQUEST Sec. 02, T.2S, R.1W, W.M. ??v-??? CONSTRUCTION NOTES OSta.'WV 747+09.5,Lt. Z_` Remove inlet 0 Sta.An'141+72.8,Lt. Remove pipe-4' Const.conc.inlet,type 0-2 w/1.5'sump Connect to extg.pipe FL out-74594'(5 129 �� Li 0 3? �` t I Ext9.R/W lN,RJR Ewg.R/W 3n 9,n 30�-- .- 3 0 { o �° ¢ ¢ LEGEND O p w t 2 PatAng m®- (Items in legend may not appear on plans) Remove manhole: 1 I ran M R _ Adjust manhole: X i c Coast.manhole O A Remove Inlet b( Adjust Inlet: a BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (OR141) Coast.manhole"' Coast manhole with Inlet: • Cap.manhole/inlet 0/0 `_ —n —U E�+u E U E u E U f Coast pipe: ENV R/W n Coast.pelf.drain pipe: Extg•R/W Remove pipe: ^^^^^�—�/ Inst.paved culvert end slope: 4 Inst ste mwarer ID marker .I. Stone embankment „-.. Ditch: _ No work area: '*i!i A. Regulated work area: IIiI II I:: Wetland boundary. 1=3 �c1QED PROfep, OREGON DEPARTMENT f ti\ GINf O OF TRANSPORTATION 9. /92S � PLAN lb," OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FAN NO CREEK TRAIL- SW SCALE I-30' 1 BEA R O��AI.A ST TIN HIGHWAY -I I ,2p'l. WASHINGTON CODUNTY OE A.Kt'. Q . �m wSaoCao rew SHUT NO. RENEWS: 6-30-2027 DRAINAGE&UTILITIES co2A HK23509dr01.dgn::CO2A I0/23/2025 8:29:1 S AM hwyel li RNN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT nu91E UPON REQUEST Sec.01 & 02, T.25, R.1W, W.M. ??V—??? CONSTRUCTION NOTES Ol Const.curb and gutter fZ; 0 Const.curb ramp,parallel-2 cost.Safety yellow trucated domes on new surface-24 sq.It. (For details,see BCOSI OConst.curb ramp,perpendicular-/ Inst.Safety yellow trucated domes on new surface-12 sq.ft. (For details,see BC07) 0 Const.curb ramp,parallel-/ Inst.Safety yellow Iterated domes on new surface-12.6 sq.ft. (For details,see BC06) (See dog.No.R0920) ¢ OS Const.Type C'conc.Island TA.: (Cut through design) (Option A"Island nose treatment) Dag.RIW —, 'NIAw 3 n 3 9 n 3 5 n_ ay.Sly Inst Safe 9 sulrfatce 24 sOdfdomes xistin I7 (For details,see sht 8C08) W C 0 0 ? 0 0 (See dwg nos RD705,RD 707,RD7/0,6 R0906) i + a © �i _ r II �' _I--. n -,,Ins— r -Paving limits __ —MU —MR �Mn- MA L.., ® .� ui I - - A PaWng limits 0 O 3 1 D. 0.____, � BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (OR141) © 9 o e -- _Pawnglimits�- --Mn (S.W. HALLMBLVD.) —Mn_ W MI Ertg.R/W �,, . i'A� �i, + i ° t9.�'.,I rArA ,,.....-, * Ee ease. © is" o 7� 6' qI i I I 0 I Paving limits I- 11.1 ¢ tA I _ �Ep PROf� OREGON DEPARTMENT f ,a o �vS�c N�INE r�0,`9� OF TRANSPORTATION �`�= oi �.s 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREER TRAIL- SW OMARA ST PROJECT PLAN ,A BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY WASHINGTON COUNTY Ci .SCALE.'I"-30' ` 14,1 0 61N BU NG Onifta:blithe Van. pNgo maw....on RENEWS: 12-31-2026 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SHEET NO R_K23509_pl_01.dga::CO3 10/23/2025 8:29:1 7 AM hwyel 1 I sN utLABLL otoe DOCU E Sec. 02, T.2S, RAW, W.M. ??V-??? CONSTRUCTION NOTES 0 Ste.MC"143+99.90,Rr. Z; Const.conc.in/et,type CC-3 w/1.5'sump (For detail,see slit.CO3B) (See dwg.nos.RD371&RD371) 0 Ste.MC"143+66.15,Rr. Adjust inlet Inst 11"storm sew pipe-35' 5'depth,sl..1.1% Connect to extg.inlet (For detail,see slit Colt) (See deg.nos.RD376,RD386&RD388) 0 Ste.ML"143+58.17,46.79'Rt. Relocate guy wires(by others) 0 Adjust water valve(by others)-6 / OS Sta."Mr 1 96,13.93'Rt. Minor adjustst storm sew.manhole ''• Method(-circle cut Extg.R/W W --1>p 47n— ..3 n 3 3 n 3 S n Eng.R/W (See dwg.nos.RD33S,RD356&RD360) -- / I I 0 Relocate water line(by others) W 4i C O n �_:�__ - a 7 Sta.ML'743+70.7/,39.03'Rt. �^-3 n -n - + Adjust gas valve(by others) —y e - n - , ,o �_ © Minor adjust storm sew.manholes-3 14 r_ ODOT water quality vaults ❑• Method C circle cut __ __ __ __ - , -Mnr- Paving limits M n— M n ' - , - —- 'P O9 Ste.MG"143+70.65,49.01'Rt. M n —M n -- N� Relocate gas line(by others) 9.02 Paving hmita ' O 4 3 O i 10 Sta.'Mr 143+57.4,54.17Rt. �r D F- Relocate comm.box(by others) 0 0 ParhfgNm/rs BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (OR141) (S.W. HALL BLVD.) 11 Sta.MC 143+63.7,14.40'Ct. O �I Mn �Mn �Mn-. Adjust comm.manhole(by others) �.— AlM n W a �1 OE of -V'c ve �lwl,` \ 0 - � ,�.•• ram, tg. W En R/W _ l f _ - Extg.ease. LEGEND _ I __ J ��'- Fxtg.perm.ease.slopes, (Items/n legend may not appear on plans) 0 -- gel - - _''-.�r water,electric,gas,and 'ate'sign ease. L 17 i 12"-35 common facilities Remove manhole: P�I■„ Adjust manhole.- V I, �j Erfg.perm.sign ease. Cons!.manhole: O 1 ' Remove Inlet X 0 I 0 Adjust inlet R a) Paving limits Const.manhole • I t, + Const manhole with Inlet: O 1 K Cap.manhole/Inlet O/CI I- Const pipe: ---- 3 ,`fc�EpPROF�J, OREGON DEPARTMENT ,a"°�aJ,• Const.perf.drain pipe: - ., gag VS 44, �NGINJ: ay OF TRANSPORTATION -`" Remove pipe: g a O '� •.oa Inst.paved culvert end slope: 4 W 92 Inst.stormater ID marker J. o IA � � OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FAN NO CREEKTRAIL- Stone embankment ??:: S SW OMARA ST PROJECT _ BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY PLAN . WASHINGTON COUNTY Ditch: - — I SCALE..1'=30' -4• 1 �-) No work area: ���������� I Nit(' omn•e be Mese ...ewer Dam McDonald Regulated work area.' ([jiiii[Eiiij ICE A.KE UNRar MIVIe Verret Cnac.er Sue Gm I Wetland boundary: ��--3 DRAINAGE&aim ES SHUT RENEWS: 6-30-2027 co3A ItK23509_dr-01.dgn::CO3A 10/23/2025 8:29:19 AM hwye111 FINAL uTRONICi DOCUMENT ??V-»? 160- CO3A O -160 'MC 143.6655,Rt. Adjust Inlet F.L.In=152.0275 127 F.L.In=151.79'(N67 F.L In=150.53(W 187 F.L out-150.53(E187 Proposed ground Ft pipe CL CO3A® We 143+99.80,Rt. Type CC-3"In/er w/1.5'sump Rim=155.64' F.L.out-152.40'(N 127 r Dag.ground ID pipe CL 155- -155 --_ Ertg.6'storm sew.(PVC) w • J.IXrt"m. J2"-34.8, l Ertg.18"storm sew(conc.) 150- • -150 0+00 Stationing(R.) 10+00 Profile Along Existing Culvert Q STA"ML"143+99.8 TO"ML"143+66.6 HOR/Z SCALE 1 20' PROF OREGON DEPARTMENT .° -i ?. (co GINf�r�Oy9l OF TRANSPORTATION ;`� 92 MW �� OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CRESURAIL- � � SW OMARA ST PROJECT BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY ,C 1, WASHINGTON COUNTY O oacm.: !we.,David McDonald k)E-A.0- MORN AMA.Valrala 011oonen Sue Cm. SHEET NO. RENEWS: 6-30-2027 PROFILE co3R CO3B 10/23/2025 8:29:22 AM hwyel li RWLLEIFLfPONC ARDUDANr H_K23509_pf_01.d 9n.: IAeu:UPON MDDO u6r 1 TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (TPAR) ??V—??? FANNO CREEK TRAIL Phase 1 _ Z__�` Phase 2 SIDEWALK CLOSED 50 25 0 50 R9-9 FEET 24x/2 R—#—# re I Swd NaBAd(71P141) a --- _- sw Hall Blvd(011/47) . / .aJt 0--�/// of- "_• %//Aka yl 3 1 2 3 IT 11I O lull O =IDES I I 1 1 f i (SCLOSEDI 2402 I€, f€11 24 z 1 1 LEGEND 1 1 C Barricade c Sign on barricade CONSTRUCTION NOTES. m Temp sidewalk ramp OMaintain 4'min.width 7PAR between edge line and PCD. C// /4I Under construction (bad-fill or rover excavation with sree/p/ate at end of each work shift as needed). y+.n,'q OREGON DEPARTMENT ?j,; O Provide access to pod push button. 28'Tubu/ar markers OF TRANSPORTATION `on 1O'max.spacing 0 Construct temporary curb ramp. -. - Ped.channelization devices OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- 4 Construct temporary walks-4'min.width. —k—# MAR � � SW OMARA ST PROJECT BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY �` Q WASHINGTON COUNTY Destner.A Grown Rowww:O.Mao OraM:A...turn Cneaian.Name SHEET NO. TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS EBO1 FINAL ELECTRONIC oow6wrTZ-K23509_tt01.dgn::EBO1 10/18/2025 7:21:08 PM hwye68( 00 TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (TPAR) ??V—??? FANNO CREEK HOUSE 50 25 0 50 FEET SIDEWALK CLOSED R9-9 24x12 • _ _ _ 1 1 S1YNall Blvd(OR141) (I L Fenno Creek House LEGEND CONSTRUCTION NOTES: OProvide 6'min.width TPAR between edge line and PCO. c Sign on barricade ( Under construction „„,„, 28'Tubular markers OREGON DEPARTMENT 3°`�je on s'max.spacing OF TRANSPORTATION Pod.channeliem/on devices OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL - 1 % SW OMARA PROJECT R— 11 TPAR � Q` BEAVE HIGHWAY WASHINGTON COUNTY Designer.A Graham ..ewer.C.Mao DmNr.A Graham Chador:Nees, SHEET NO. TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS EB02 TZ_K23509_[L01.dgn::EB02 10/18/2025 7:21:08 PM hwye681 COD.ELECTRONIC E.T 00C DOCUMENT REQUEST TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (TPAR) ??V-??? SW OMARA STREET Phase 1 Phase 2 —fz—imeC Dn i c ta.meD �aosEDEwu r_ R9-9 0 0R9-9 SO 25 0 50 I4x/2 74x17 ? FEET A a k L # If # c k e ar —k #—k1 �4I s y- 1— — SWHal/B(vdWWI __ I _ SW Hall Blvd(OR141) ' �— I k 1k� (l Ir—i-1—Y — • a 3 S ' 1 I I SIDEWAL CLOSED ' CLOSED CLOSED R9-9 y 24,12 -- ....CI `_ 74a'I7 x1 III I � - S S LEGEND e Barricade c Sign on barricade CONS7RUC77ON NOTES: m Temp.sidewalk ramp corw CD Maintain 4'min.width TPAR between edge line and PCD. ® Under construction OREGON DEPARTMENT a L�tj; (backfill or cover excavation with steel plate at end of each work sh/h as needed). OF TRANSPORTATION ` 18'Tubv/ar markers 0Construct temporary curb ramp. on/0'max.spacing ` Ped.channellzatlon deNces 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- O Construct temporary walks -4'min.width. 4kS SW OMARA ST PROJECT BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY -A-# TPAR• `` Q WASHINGTON COUNTY Dw4mc AGmeem ReAwECMeo DENHE A°mNm OmWer Name SHEETS°. TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS EBE TK2350901.dgn EB03 10/18/2025 7:21:08 PM hwve68f EL000,555 REQUEST TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (TPAR) ??V-??? SW OMARA STREET Phase 3 OLOSED OR22-7 ? 74x18 r t r� I + e a 4 _ SWIM!I Ned MRI41) • _ SO 25 0 SO FEET RrTT�I 1�=�T� 1 I— CRDSSVWX CLOSED OR22-7 74x/8 i LEGEND C 8anicade c Sign on barricade ® Under construction 28'Tubular markers OREGON DEPARTMENT ^j_ on zo•max.spacingOF TRANSPORTATION , —R-f WAR 44407 tra OR341(SW HALL AFARO CREEK TRJUL- SW OMARA N-TU ST PROJECT BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY S WASHINGTON COUNTY Dmtmr.&5SRNn RNw.anC.Mw D•aI1r:A Dml.m Cud.mum SM(El NQ TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS EB04 TZK23509_tc_01.dgn::E804 10/18/2025 7:21:08 PM hwye68f AVAILABLE NAL ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT ON REQUEST EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL GENERAL NOTES LEGEND The construction,adjustment,maintenance,and upgrading of these Erosion and P11/slope Sediment Control measures is the responsibility of the contractor for the duration of the project to comply with Section 00280 of the Oregon Standard —— Cut slope Specifications for construction and,when applicable,the WIVES 1200-Ca permit. EIn/et protection Erosion and Sediment Contra/measures shown on this plan are for anticipated site conditions.Adjust or upgrade these measures for unexpected storm events , Topsoil and seeding to ensure that sediment and sediment-laden water does not leave the site. Develop a revised plan of the Erosion and Sediment Control measures shown as g' Seeding and mulching required by Sect/on 00280,Oregon Standard Specifications for Construction. Implement this plan for all clearing and grading activities and in segments Sediment barrier, straw wattle applicable to each staging phase.Construct in such a manner so as to ensure that sediment and sediment-/adenwater does not enter the roadway or drainage system,or violate applicable water standards. Flow direction Install measures within the right-of-way unless directed otherwise. —► Slope direction -•—•- Work zone fencing Graphic symbols are approximate.P/ace Erosion Control measures as required or directed. q,,(c'C)14T C ORE�FQ GON DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION �4' OF • • 0R 141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEKTRAIL- r Mag ardtt SW OMARA ST PROJECT AA BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY �O`05/ 4/99 WASHINGTON COUNTY � Designe:Magna BPaullenolaR (1PE p�L� Donor MU.... Checked: RMemrr.PaulSwam SWUM. EXPIRES:05-31-2026 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS FBO1 RtgsRTEE-K23509_ecpl0l.dgn F801 10/23/2025 8:29:28 AM hwye111 ROMANS UPON Rr , ??V-??? CONSTRUCTION NOTES ZEIC (.Const.Inlet protect/on Types 3 (See dwy.RO1010) Olnst sediment barrier Type 3 (See atty.RD/0301 OInst.eo/topsoil l-2'wide r'' O Inst/awn seed and mulching 0' O Inst.lawn seed and mulching _; Eyry.R/W ___ © ©O„© Dag.R/W/L �•r- 'v - 4*.sib', / -- — " / tr3 n L.— - ,n 3 0�'T QF ------�=03in — •—t��ce���' n&eimn .x n sl'7r �/i— M n �yj=——=�� —�_ ad l a � �4. x ® I Paving limits—s SOOVT33�1' L 0 paving limy I e J r 1 S.W.BEAVERTON-TUALATIN (OR141) J r / (S.W. HALL BLVD.) y 0 I 9 y lam- -_------$,--o 7L.—.—.—.—.� LEGEND _ � •.... Fill slope • ® ♦ _ _ _ �(�E� - —— Cut slope T Dag'R/W —O Inlet protection 3 4 e-`�it.� iii Topsoil and seeding Extg.VW I: � `� � ,4 , I Ise° gl Seeding and mulching I I ' Sediment barrier, straw wattle ,a-• •(.....�r S I I I -•—•• Work zone fencing \'it Ili ''' II' �'I W �t (.c\STERF OREGON DEPARTMENT I .a o'It 429� Q OF TRANSPORTATION `�: ,, z 1, • l OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- la/ 4 a r Mag ardtt BES OOMN AST PROJECT I, WAY WASHINGTON COUNTY �Q�05/ 4/99 444 �\ D,,,,,,.M.p ua Bem.vEt ReNew Petal lam. PLANtj 4PE AskL nm� Mtr&gym ,Sta.Crowe SCALE.I"-30' I 51.1,10. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN EXPIRES:05-31-2026 F802 Hwwnc"EE_K23509ecpl_O1.dgn::El[Sheet] 10/23/202S 8:29:28 AM hwyelli Nu u sr • CONSTRUCTION NOTES Z; 0 Inst.6'of opsod 1-2'wide OInst.lawn seed and mulching "I ?R 19, Q� t 1 2 I 1 7 n ion 3 a B. 1 u , 1 BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (OR141)(S.W. HALL BLVD.) �HvJnyRm/ts LEGEND —•— e y, HI slope W J o 3 Cur slope `' o U E l U E U E U E— d E— • Topsoil and seeding DM.R/W n ERIV R/W -,-' Flow direction Z —► Slope direction ��"G142 ERFp OF TRANSPORTATION e. • • OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- r Mag ardtt eEn OOMN AST PROJECT P{/eN (, TIN HIGHWAY WASHINGTON COUNTY SCALE I"-30 Q�t o5/ 4/99 �\ DeaWa:Mama Bernhardt h....,,Paul Lange+. ‘.(.re Checker p�L D��A�.o.e.. e tea® SHEET NO. EXPIRES:05-31-2026 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN FB03 EE-K23509_ecDl_O1.dgn::E2[Sheet] 10/23/202S 8:29:29 AM hwyel1 i RN.ELECTRONIC UPON REQUEST PHASE 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PERIMETER CONTROL ??V-??? CONSTRUCTION NOTES Z— OI Const.in/et protection Types 3 (See dwg.R01010) O/nst.6'of topsoil 1-2'wide OInst.lawn seed ® 4 2 3 Dag.R/W 'H_' 3 n 3 n 3 n— I l • FitF.R/W CF IN n ��7TT���TTT��"" ¢ 9 an a 1 an g__M n -Mn-- c.tMn —Mn •- a ? v, � n `'"----Paving limits ri J�_- -- i BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY. (OR141) �- o 9 I' e s (S.W. HALL BLVD.) LEGEND M n •---- _ Fill slope - __ _ _ =_�(•S^ 3BE. /i='-= ,I1 Cut slope U£ UE Ut ® oe E .'.1. \` h. I / I o bag.R/W -- � m����i, 1 //i -._i- ,-- a Inlet protection Extg.R/W ,, ,' _ /R . - Ertg.ease. l fJ/�� __. Topsoil and seeding �����4 ti` Flowd/rest/on L ©© 0 'I I I Slope direct/on O O 2 3 W FPaving limits N ou oC\L" 42 ERFO OORF TRANSPOGON RTATION TMENT '�`,' 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEKTRAIL- T—Mag ardt SW OMARA ST PROJECT PLAN L BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY (�- WASHINGTON COUNTY SCALE I'=30' ��05/ 4/99 & — O �\ OeM Magnus Be nneAll Re leaer Paul Langdale .r(1PE 5%L OAS INNevenela Sue pm SHEET NO. EXPIRES:OS-31-2026 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN FBoa FINAL ELK23509_ecp1_01.d9n II E3[Sheet] 10/23/2025 429.30 AM hwyel l l AVAEcLERa o P°°WI61rt 71V-?n t� Grade to CHANNEL&GRATE INSTALLATION TABLE march Sheet Note Station Offset Gutter Lieu Depression Elev. B Outfall-Stone embankment - I�_ material COLA 4 ML'137+82.1,RL Field Verify Field Verily Field Verify Concrete COLA 5 ML"137+70.1,Rt. Field Verf Field Veri Field Verify Channel Inlet grate Sidewalk I splash pad 1 h (For details,see this sin) I, 1p5 I a U See sht 8CO2 for width._ Inlet curb with vert. 189(24-grate, Steel curb opening 'fl� 6•o o Inst.reference point inside channel walls It in place (For details,see this SW - - - �,• J Tapered wing Inlet curb (See table) A _ c @ A Channel inlet grate wall Concrete curb See grate and frame o (for details,see this shtJ Concrete (See dwg.no.RO700) (for details,see this shc) Oa splash pad • • nb o o a See sht.BC01 for slope _ �_ Inst.reference point74 - T N Place stone -I�wlS11 (See table) f inks curb - R�1 0 0 0 + embankment Match - �M��I� 2% material exist v c Channel inlet bottom 6" curb Channel inlet frame {� Sidewalk , (For details,see this shU 1 �S — .. / 1, Extend Inlet curb Depress gutter B J I at 15 degree angle 1 Subgrade Expansion Joint 2' utter _ to create to 1'at opening S S' 4' g tapered geotexti/e each side?yp.1 depression ' wing walls Concrete curb and gutter Steel opening (See dwg.no.RD700) CHANNEL AND GRATE INLET PLAN VIEW (For details,see thissht.) CHANNEL AND GRATE INLET SECTION A-A CHANNEL AND GRATE INLET SECTION B-B SCALE NTS SCALE N75 SCALE NTS l/4'Thick angle a3 Reber,6"/on el D iron frame around g 1/8"Gap inlet perimeter 18"0.C.,welded //4"Bons,flush t� 1/T 1/1' to frame 3/16'dia. weep hole 1/4' I Grate I ICI I 11/1'-tl r 1/2" Grate j�� 11111111'I� Top of gratebye-longL L Flame =To of curb 1/1'dia. P 3�_ headed concrete anchor Inlet Thread bolt Depth and bolt andguttericken curb III 3 h e d(Typ 11 p channel into frame pattern per lTmJ tenter of end plates T -- wall 9 (See note 4) manufacturer 1/4" 1'S' C 'p C HSS 6x2x1/8 I'- 1 I 1/4' Min.1/8'thick FRAME DETAIL GRATE ATTACHMENT DETAIL L �o end plate D 6 1 - SCALE'NTS SCALE.NTS Depress gutter I 2'at opening I_ 2411/16 (use curb d METAL INLET ASSEMBLY DETAIL METAL INLET ASSEMBLY DETAIL gutter where PROFILE SECTION D-D apropriate, warp pavement SCALE:NTS SCALE NTS �..(4)//4"bolts per grate, to lit otherwise) lc / see grate attachment PliNotes: \ detail this she I.Headed concrete anchors shall m''.'2 \`` CURB OPENING DETAIL A5764A-1 the 088.dremenrs of PLAN VIEW 2. Use ASTM A-500 Grade 8. �\ SCALE N7S HSS 6x1x1/8 Channel 3. Use AS7MA-36.End plates rtp PROf65 OREGON DEPARTMENT ?e-CHANNEL GRATE 4. UseASIMA-113.Hot-DipGINE�� OF TRANSPORTATION SCALE:N7S IL ub ;� /G `•'�.Smtef Galanized assembly '9 NOTES 92 1. Cast iron,natural finish. 4. Grate to be rated for H-20load/ng,with a non-slip _L S. Grind al/single bevel groove 0R 141(SW HALL BLVD FANNO CREEK TRAIL- suncce having a static coefficient of friction Depress gutter welds smooth. I 2.No opening greater than 3/8. between 0.60 and 1.0 per AS7M C7020. Use a 2'at opening SW OMARA ST PROJECT coefficient of friction of 0.80 to 7.0 on inclines 6. Design vertical wheel load is 9EAVEWASN-GTON COUTINNTY HIGHWAY CURB OPENING DETAIL g •'-'4 ; tiati WASHINGTON COON Y 3.Protect threaded holes/n frame greater than 4% B.Skips from dogging during frame (1/2 of the tandem axles ,14<' o yuw:Z.N.., Nome:Smis nao.rme Installation. 5. Wavy grate as shown or approved ADA compliant SECTION C-C weight specified in IOf A.K" orate.:uw.v.u.m aw.er.Soo Gm equialent(Avai/able pattern may vary) SCALE NTS FHWA-HOP-06-705). SHEET NO. RENEWS: 6-30-2025 STORMWATER PLAN HAO1 GINH_K23509_stdt 01.dgn::HA01 10/23/2025 8:29:33 AM hwyelli AVAILABLE UPON RREQQUEST"n g 7 0 al 0 om ® 0 ® © ® —Z—_� °`0 © 0 i ..... s. wE C ' _ 1 - -- rim - •- ' e N.N- ,.,. a O C— 2 R%TO ®000 ® ©® ©■16 LEGEND 0 Install new sign(N) Install new sign(N)on new(M)sign support .0 Maintain and protect existing sign(N)and support NOON °E0 EN Dw4t TM200M200,TWO',TM223,TM240, TM671,TM676,TM681,TM687, 0.SN Remove and save existing sign(N)and remove(M)sign support and TM688 NN Reinstall ex/sting sign(N)on new(M)sign support ALw,�ib PROF- OOREGON DEPARTMENT0Remove existing sign(N)and(M)sign support �,5 ,NGIN�y9 OF TRANSPORTATION ' N=Sign Number 74 M-Material �r�-CID 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- Material options. SW OMARA ST PROJECT Non 000 ,• a• BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY W=Wood Sign Post NOTE: M, µP_000.0.00.00 W0.5HINGTON COUNTY ST-Perforated Steel Square Tube Sign Support The locations of sign Installations shown 0� "v _ CCS-Crosswalk Closure Support a Ex/sting signs not shown are l T '� 500 Prue m NNW. re approx. with exact locations to be remain in place unless otherwise UNIT RE CODE ' NNW. 5=Steel Support determined In the field. directed by the Engineer. 00000 '41Y D D.5 DAeen see GNAW°um Cfy1SAU NO. SHEET NO. 00000 RENEWS:6-30-2026 SIGN INSTALLATION PLAN LA01 RNA ELECTRONIC DOCUTN_K23509_snps_01.dgn::LA01 7/18/2025 I2:17:09 PM hwyl By aPEST I ??V-??? 1----1 0 4:111111' / \ NO I Sf Dmaro s S � N9WD — J Sign No.76 Sign No.11 Sign No.e (R1 7) 2 x 20a Sign No.1 (W77 1) Sign No.20 I NO I VEHICLES I I FANNO CREEK I r---I I— I PARK I •SPEED Sign No.12 )_—~ J CAD I LIMIT I SignNo.17 I CIVIC CM 1301 IPA I 5/gn No.2 Sign No.7 Sign No.21 (W11 15) I TR,7c',2 I I T-RAIL I I---- 1 GM AHEAD I SPEED Sign No.13 S/gn No.18 1 Sign No.3 I LIMIT I Fenno I µis 9P) 35 I I Creek I —J Sign No.22 Sign No.8 [(C-REEK]I CAIEJJ I TIEAID SENIOR CIAI SIGN I CROSSWALK SEALS ON RHEEISI —J Sign No 4 CLOSED Sign No.19I(04/3-R) i Signs shown with broken Sign No.9 `____ I borders are existing signs. (OR22-7J Sign No.1 Q `ICED PROferJ� OREGON DEPARTMENT i j_' _ �\�/GIN�I OF TRANSPORTATION ` I STOP I 74, I HERE 1———— CD 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- Is1r Hall BNeI -i<'c I or. I I MHO CREEK I SWOMARASTPROJECT HI.000 K. BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY S/gn No.S I �,PARK µp_DDDDDnDDDD O.� WASHINGTON COUNTY .____I L——'_1 _MT ME CODE e,' I ,z �'S� o.�w„�/s.� Res.., 1.H.,n -Sign No.10 S/gn Na.15 00000 FMy D• - D.nw: J.S. 0.c..r cM.o FIRSSU NO. SHUT NO. D00000 RENEWS:6-30-2026 SIGN DETAILS BL o1 TN_K23509_snps_01.dgn::LB01 10/22/2025 9:58:57 AM hwyrl8y n DPONIC REQUEST U SIGN&POST DATA TABLE 77Y/_77? SIGN SIGN LOCATION SUB- COLOR I/ SIGN TYPE OF SUPPORT POST FOOTING REMARKS NO. 1/ SIGN DIMENSIONS SENATE � lFGN1D SECONDARY SIGN LOCATION MIN. (TM200-TM201, LEGEND NO. _ SIZE IENGTII 3 DEPTH N676 a TM6761 T1A63S1 2j �� 'a u p�p t ! 4 >u — ? 5/ x WIDTH HEIGHT -0 `- g 133 3 g V 7 ^ i m d i d 0 y u 6 u a W u U ry 1,9g .5.g LENGTH E 5 8 'ME'133+00 R (361 (481 8 u 2 I/2'x 12GA 12' 3'-0' Anchor:TS3"it 3'(MA)3' 20 'ML'133 150I. (361 (361 20 / 2 1/2'X IOW 14' 3'-0" Slip lax:TS 3'x 3"(7CA)3' 20a - (241 (241 20a Support Detailed For Sign i20;Mount Below Sign 420 7 'NE"135+25 L (361 (481 7 ♦ 2 1/2'x 120A 13' 3'-0" Anchor:TS 3'x 3'(7CN 3' 1 2 'NV 135+50R 36' 36' , Y BK A 2 -, 2I/2'X TOGA 14' 3'-0" SIIp Base:153'x 3'(ZGA(3' 3 - 24' 12' ✓ Y BK - 3 11 'NV 137+90L 12" 18' J W R II NON.ODEFINMST SW Sygon Fxlnp'wpm:swat To The Pg..01 Tuvel. 18 -ML-138+106 021 (361 18 Install On Existing PSST Sign Support Below Existing 51gn 12 4 "ML'113+28 C 12' 36" / Y BK 4 2"x 12GA 16' 3'-0" Anchor:TS 2 1/2"x 2 I/2'(7G/)3' 4 'NV 143+47C 12' 36' / Y BK I 4 ✓ 2'1(12CA 8' 3'-0" Anchor:TS21/2"o 21/2'(7GN 3' 6 'NL'144+10R 36' 36' I R W ! 6 7 21/4'621/2"12GA (2' 3'-0" SIIp Base:T53'x 3"(7GA)3. 5 - 3'-0' 1'-0' C W / 5 Support Detailed For Sign 16;Mount Above Sign 46 5 - 3'-0' I'-0' / G W 5 Support Detailed For Sign a6;Mount Opposite Sign*15 16 - (3'-61 11'-01 16 Supporl Oata,bd For Sqn F6.Mount Above And PerpmdooI.To Sqn ES 16 - (3'-61 (1'-01 16 Support Detailed For Sign B6:Mount Opposite Sign 1/16 9 'ML'144+20 R 24' 18' + W BK V 9 9 - 24' 1B' W BK 1 9 I Support Detailed For Sign 89;Mount Opposite Sign 19 1 'MC 146+65 L ' 36' 36' Y BK I 2 112"K IOW 14' 3'-0" Slip Bax:TS 3'x 3'(7GRI 3' 3 - 24' 12' Y BK - 3 Support Detailed for Sign PI.Mount Below Sign i1 1/ 2/ 4/ BK-BLACK NOTE:L.C.R ARE LOCATIONS NOTE:THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE �8.,� BL-BLUE Of PO5T5 FACING THE SIGN. EXCEPT FOR SPEED ZONES,SCHOOL ZONES,OBJECT ��\ktp PROFfffr, OREGON DEPARTMENT s L,��4 BR-BROWN L-LEFT POST MARKERS AND MILEPOST MARKERS.MGM LOCATIONS F'7-FLUORESCENT YELLOW C-CENTER POST ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER V� �NGINf Dy OF TRANSPORTATION .+` p C-GREEN R-RIGHT POST "�C as 0-ORANGE Mir P-PURPLE 3/ 5/ W S 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- 6-RED DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE, MINIMUM DEPTH OF FOOTING FOR TRIANGULAR SW OMARA ST PROJECT • BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY RB-RED-BLUE FACE OF CURB,GUARDRAIL.OR BARRIER BASE BREAKAWAY AND MULTI-POST BREAKAWAY MT,U00 - r ,h WASHINGTON COUNTY MT,D00.00n00.00 O `A3 W-WHRE TO THE CENTERLINE OF FOOTING.FOR INSTALLATIONS IS FOR A 2'DIAMETER FOOTING. UNIT FILE CODE /C 1 r'2 '`y pesyyyr 1.5mu Rwb.er aNges Y-YELLOW ADDMONAL INFORMATION SEE STANDARD FOR A0001ONAL INFORMATION SEE STANDARD 00000 �`/L/y D.S- Durte,: 1Se1u Ow*:C.Meu YG-FLOUBESCENTYELLQY-GREEN DRAWINGS T3d600,TM602,AND TM 635 DRAWINGS TM601 AND TM602. - OLVIS9U NO. SHEET NO. 00000 RENEWS:6-30-2026 SIGN&POST DATA TABLE LC01 TN_K23509_snps_01.dgn::LCO1 10/22/2025 9:58:08 AM hwyrl8y FIMMUHiEu°po°i R°pii[ai T LEGEND LEGEND LEGEND CONTINUED BEAVERTON—TUALATIN HWYAT FANNO CR TRAIL CONTROLLERS JUNCTION BOXES OR141(HALL BLVD)ATM.P. 5.64 ® Retain and protect existing Model A7Ccontrollerand Install!T.rilex12'(min.dimension)pretast concrete or BEAVERTON—TUALAT/NHWYATOMARAST C made1332 cabinet hybrid junction box with concrete apron OR 141(HALL BLVD)AT M.P. 5.80 0 Install 22ir12x12"(min.dimension)precast BEAVERTON—TUALATIN HWYAT WALL ST concrete or hybridjunchbn box P O L E s 0 Install 22 x12 12'(min.dimension)precast concrete or OR 141(HALL BLVD)AT M.P.5.87 hybrldjunctlon box with concrete apron (TIGARD) OInstal/luminaire pole(see metal light pole table) IX Retain and protect existing junction box U Install 0-length)loot luminaire arm ® Remove existing junction box m install pedestal with frangible base on number(N-number) © foundation ® Retain and protect existingpower poleE T E C T I O 1 (poser source) D N Dp Retain and protect existing traffic signal mast arm pole CI Install far-range radar detector unit(T-Radar) el Remove existing vehicle signal pedestal ® Abandon existing detector loop OD Install cabinet interface device JIREB C51 Install(N..number)aluminum(36 x367 pedestrian crossing WIRES&CABLES sign(WI 1-21 ASTAM type IX sheeting AL Install(N-number)aluminum(36 5,367 trail crossing W visa//wiring to serve pole O'=pale number)as 7 sign(WI!-15)AS7M type AY sheeting OI required by the manufacturer • Instal/(N-number)aluminum(18x309 diagonal downward V RI install(N-number)no.(C-wire slze)AWC 7MWN wire(s) pointing arrow plaque(Wt6-719A5TM type ix sheeting O Install actuated beacon system controller cabinet m Install(N-number)no.(C-wire sire)AWCXMMW wire(s) ( IignR/025e pushbutton with mount&instruction T Install radar control cable(!-Radar) IRRfBI Install(N=number)RRFB rapid flashing bar ® Remove existing wiring ) Remove solar panel energy source ® Retain and protect existing wiring BEACONS CONDUITS ACCOMPANIED BY FANGS: TM450,TM457,TM462,TM467, a Remove flashing beacon 0 Install(S=size)inch conduit TM470,TM471,TM472,TM482, HDD) Install conduit byhorizonal directional dn7/ing, TM485,TM493,TM629,TM630, open moth not allowed TM631 CABINETS 0 install conduit and wire as required by Rows company 63 install base mounted service cabinet,120/290 vote metered Retain and protect existing Interconnect conduit for signal&Illumination system �I� MOM&mem Mmoml ® Retain and protect existing base mounted service cabinet 'I`' Retain and protect existing electrical conduit r,'�1-'3protect existingdetector conduit OREGON DEPARTMENT j; U Retain and 5��\kEp PROFEffr OF TRANSPORTATION •,`—� SIGN 5 G Splice new electrical conduit to existing electrical conduit 0�G E ��se Z 48 r ▪ Remove existing aluminum sign and mount I.U MINAIRES $ OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- /nsta//160 watt light emittingdiode luminaire(seer special $1N ONUIRA Sf PROTECT LED gPe NNn Mt BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY provisions).Bond/uminaire to pole grounding terminal. MS,S LIM Y \prof WASHINGTON COUNTY Install photo electronic relay on pole uxnrueoouE 1' �' `p+ O0 rS�ti� o.NM.:ADow R.A.N.�:&Ito.p... ® 00000 4^ N K. TO GWw J...., 0,0m N.Mao U Retain and protect existing luminaire a �, - -— Mi/MeNO. s Dec..5• I smerNa 00000 I LEGEND MA01 UMENT TS_K23509_sg_cad_01.dgn::MA01 10/23/2025 6:46:23 PM hwye09J Av BAtswr UPONIONM MMNoREQUEST FLASHING BEACON PLAN BEAVERTON—TUALATIN HWYAT FANNO CR TRAIL 0 ® OR147 (HALL BLVD)ATM.P. 5.64 R/W 0 (T/CARD) fz_.t v 0 0•oleNo.xxx 74 T,Qt®o tre s 2BF z Cora, _______10_2! 1 4111 __ i 0. a !� SEAVERTON-7UALIT/N NWY(0 741NNALL BLW1 ��®`�J ili� ` 4- _ iiioin PMI PP Pole No.1 �IL� 1 2BFxxx mamnitespro ____ `` - i fR/W 40 m m -4k 0 tin I` " ! WY, I 0' © © kit ®1I ©0 ©0 ©S 2 ' 2 01 W 0 Pole No.3 COC100 0 Tmne Saaon New... p PROF OREGON DEPARTMENT � , 1cz fff OF TRANSPORTATION V ENGINE. /O9 Q 48 l NOTES: OR141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- 1.Remove and re-Install Interconnect cable between sl - SW OMARA$1 PROTECT goal at SW Burnham St and Wall 5[after routing conduit under drainage. uwr.tat BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY Y o WASHINGTON COUNTY gyp_5 2.Remove and re-Install service conductors after routing conduit under drainage. 1 r Oner cQ �c Dna1¢ner.l. ...wooR.nompmn �00000� +o���N R.�Xs ,I. Eselter.1 Omer C...N.N.p UmSSU No. es Dec.-SN• SHEET No. 00000 FLASHING BEACON PLAN MBOI TS_K23509_sg_cad_01.dgn::MB01 10/23/2025 6d6:24 PM hwye09J FINAL LE UPON REQUEST EXISTING UTILITIES BEAVERTON—TUALAT/N HWYAT FANNO CR TRAIL OR141 (HALL BLVD)ATM.P. 5.64 i R/W / (TIGARD) z—��C X f staP.T:.,.,GS< _....--.r" IV Ilk—i-----EB' n '=raL ��� Ear - ._—_. - 't. .-•- .. •s 4`: '.J, / -- n 2 n— _ -- Or—r y _— Oi 1 Oi� a � Oi 1 n M9d O.^• ®--- �' M/1 Mn MR MA M =:�Mf�r —Mf N/1— - C. q r BEA✓ERTON-7UALA77N HWY(c !()�MD) °M y`, ``p. "' o II 1 — . --' ---- -- i gmj--�---_ o P 'S --- _-1 ,� a I•I1 E5 = n` • -- — E uE--R/W a Fro-, _1 M Bras =7, N F rej '�' rR/W \-- I 1 1 1 7u :$ p ! I I , �1ED PROF OREGON DEPARTMENT p4,°; V��NGI NE- Fff�O� OF TRANSPORTATION •,`� 48 l 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- SW OMARA ST PROJECT NMv:161 ea BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY (� WASHINGTON COUNTY M.IINrt nu cox Y 1� \�t/-< D �S ,to .sien r:l..., ReNewer,Thanpee .o,; 00000 , �N R. do SW J.a,., tneclon M.Mee orVTSSU NO. es Dec.3s• SHEET NO. 00000 EXISTING UTILRIES MBO2 FINU Ts_K23509_sg_cad_01.dgn::MB02 10/23/2025 6:16:24 PM hwye09J NELECTRONIC UPON EST FLASHING'BEACON PLAN BEAVERTON—TUALATIN HWYAT OMARA ST zit OR141 (HALL BLVD)ATM.P. 5.80 20 1 (TIGARD) w ©© Z' 0000 Pole No.9 R/W � ©© � 0�7 : xxx0 1,34121130 R/W -- _ . 1 o , -- - -_- p©EooM — B __ �� _ ---� 0 0 ��� i_____I=IP I _ U 1 �— • ~ ii BEAVERTON-TUALAflN HWY(OR141)(HALL BLVD) a MEI i Pole No.6 ,_ �1// I©I I_ I�'®2 6® _ � ;A_ _ Jr R/W .11Al i VP /• �� -= Ti m Pole No.7 s J J e �V��® 2BFxxx 4 j I ss 1 II �R/W Traffic s.w.Rwo�. OREGON DEPARTMENT �o p ��Ep PROF J OF TRANSPORTATION •,`i ��IN /O9 I OR141(SW HALL )ST OO CREEK TRAIL- SW TON TU L 1NPROJECTHIGHWAY 9EAVERTON-TOALAOU HIGHWAY 0,0 It C.> NTY (y 21. ` u.w.�I.o R,w..«:5.mempson '�I "0'000o� <"+.g900 R.CO gD - orV�ssuRo. '^.S Dec.V. FLASHING BEACON PLAN MCSHEE r+o. 00000 MC01 TS_K23509_sg_cad_O1.dgn::MC01 10/23/2025 6:46:25 PM hwye091 f'nvuu55uaa+Ra6, EXISTING UTILITIES BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWYAT OMARA ST OR141 (HALL BLVD)ATM.P. 5.80 —z�� (TIGARD) el n 3n 3n 3n— Au —3n=3n1% an. 3n 3n—�3n 39 39 3n �': . ......... --- —..1...------I / • 3 a 37i - 3 n 3 ft-4-- a 3 0 I3 • ° —— === _- �L�6y:1 a -4 n _ —Win— �Mn—t7R1=_' —tea -1 - • . 1 .-. —M n— o I p M BEAEerov-nuu>'uviwrroa�.i>neaee�vo� : I W ! 1 W - _ 371 a OAl9lT _ 0 �_.._ o 3 I 9 ( 0 9 9 n 9 9 9 9 \ > I ; mn - -�M9 _ —M a— —Mn— — M M .. metn-,,,--,-,-.: ,ii,,,, AI\ I 1 1 1 411 ' --, --- !,111,71*---:_touw71.7,,„!: 1 i I 1 li P i i) �, t1 °' 0 0 Traffic Swiss . O I t PB OREGON DEPARTMENT ?�' d-. „c oNE .1.;y OF TRANSPORTATION .,1 i al 46 ? 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FAN NO CREEK TRAIL- . . OMAFtA N-TUST PROJECT H BEAVEWASH-GTON COUNTY HIGHWAY IA,5a0 Y ��K WASHINGTON COUNIV WMHECODE 1 S"�!C DmlPbr.I.Ormr ReN=wer.SlRanp�an 00000 +0 ��N R. T., Welte.I.Peet �,..M.� Oryrssu RO. �05 Dec.9%• ,,,,,,No. 00000 EXISTING UTILITIES MCO2 TS_K23509_sg_cad_01.dgn::MCO2 10/23/2025 6:46:26 PM hwye09J al^PLL ELECT ONIC DOCINE SIGNAL PLAN BEAVERTON—TUALATIN HWYAT WALL ST OR141 (HALL BLVD)ATM.P. 5.87 z— C (TIGARD) Al Sk . �R/W -R/W 60 \\ i u � Z_ M n -M/I �11 < 11hi BEAVEPTON-7UAL.477NHWY(OR I41) II f R/W 11 j fR/W - Li / ] i — of 8 *Pole No.10 _Trzflic Section Am* OREGON DEPARTMENT (I. ‘i;`\0 PROF /oq OF TRANSPORTATION 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEKTRAIL- SWOW:tie1 VE T N-TUSiPROJECT xv.Y:sai SW HALL HIGHWAY N�a� WASHINGTON COUNTY LODE Y 2 I. S(`� oeemner 1.au. Rewewers.n,anR�n UNIT `'Q, CNN R.U� oti aeR',.aee. a»arer,I.Moo OSHEET NO. R/MU 000 ^es Dec.3�'� SIGNAL PLAN MDO1 7S_K23509_sg_cad_Ol.dgn::MDOI 10/23/2025 6:46:26 PM hwye09j wile UPON RRoEQUEST DETAILS POLE ENTRANCE CHART FOUNDATION EQUIPMENT ON POLE EQUIPMENT ON MAST ARM INFORMATION LUMINAIRES MISC. (Length In Feet and Equipment Type) -EQUIP. PONLE SHEET TYPT IMES PUSHBUTTON WI�NET DEC. SIGNAL FUME CHI D 1 0 2 D 3 D 4 D S D 6 D 7 D 6 N6110) FOUNDATION ARM ARM LENGTH DEC. ARRIN5 ON ARM DEC.DEQ DEC. DEG. C8LMUT ,, DEPTh 1 MBO1 PP/1 180 2 MB01 EX/MP 270 270 30 RRFB IX IX ;RACKET MOUNT 3 MBOI LP 15.0 0 40.0 MY-Traffic Signal Type IV,4'Side Pole Mount VI R-Traffic Signal Type 1 R,4'Side Pole Mount 4 MBOI PP/1 0 V2-Traffic Signal Type 2,Adjustable Bracket Mount V3L-Traffic Signal Type 3L,Adjustable Bracket Mount 5 MBOI EX/MP 270 270 35 S.5 V3R-Traffic Signal Type 3R,Adjustable Bracket Mount RUB V4=Traffic Signal Type 4,Adjustable Bracket Mount -6 MCOI LP 180 15.0 0 40.0 V4L=Traffic Signal Type 4L,Adjustable Bracket Mount V5=Traffic Signal Type 5,Adjustable Bracket Mount 7 MCOI PP/3 O a 180 0 6 V6L-Traffic Signal Type 6L,Adjustable Bracket Mount 180 180 V7=Traffic Signal Type 7,Adjustable Bracket Mount 8 MCOI PP/3 /8a 0 1 - - 08U V8-Traffic Signal Type 8,Adustable Bracket Mount V9=Traffic Signal Type 9.Adjustable Bracket Mount V10-Traffic Signal Type 10,Adjustable Bracket Mount 9 MCO1 LP 15.0 0 40.0 SA-Sign,_'x_'Aluminum w/Adjustable Bracket Mount 1 0 MDOI DC/MP 30 IX IX IX 12.5 IX IX IX IX SO=Sign,—'x—'Interior Illuminated w/Adjustable Bracket Mount 1 V4L F V2 RAD V2 SNS fco `el The north wow shown relates to zero degrees on Pedestrian and Vehicle signal poles.Degrees shown elk_ The In the pole entrance chart show the degrees clockwise .,� horn plan sheet north arrow(zero)to equipment located y on the pole. P4 t of Pedestrian Head D7,D8... t of Vehicle Head \ / MY / - I / DS \ 0 t of Pedestrian Head -- — ® 0 O4 I // Ir 0 D3 , • D�yI1DI--(-- I — / NOTE: I t of Arm- -------------- — ——— 180' Equipment shown on the orientation diagram Is a dariflcatkn of angles of equipment that t Traffic „ may M located on a pedestrian pedestal or of t of Terminal Cabinet J nehice pedestal. _ Pedestrian Head ,,� OREGON DEPARTMENT ,. NOTE: c ,'/ i PEDESTRIAN PEDESTAL/VEHICLE PEDESTAL ��s\. PROF OF TRANSPORTATION ;l���; Equipment shown on the orientation diagram is SSA ORIENTATION DIAGRAM , dG I N 4Oy an example of distance and angles of equipment 4,0� 270 �"4 l that may be located on a mast arm or signal pole. I OR141(SW�OLL BLVD):M ANN C ST `RREEKTRAIL- T t of Pedestrian Head xvm.i t �ro BFA WWASSHHINGGTOONN COUNTY HIGHWAY MAST ARM PALE ORIENTATION DIACtRAM w- 17 FILE CODE ' 2 N\°', ax ,I ewer.S.Illempson 00000 .4. Oq� 21. S�Q ,.Ors..o�., �o,ea M.+0,;014/758U NO. , NN R. /0 00000 SHEET NO. es Dec.3�. DETAILS MEO1 nviLEwcSTS_K23509_sg_cad_01.dgn:MEW 10/23/2025 6:46:26 PM hwye09J neury REQUEST DETAILS METAL LIGHT POLE TABLE POLE **ATTACHMENT UPS W EEP /ARM • LUMINAIRE MWNTING BASE NO. STATION �l.AR�F Ltft) H"jar" OM LAMP LINE L)VOLT TYPE HEIGHTt) CONSPL O.NOTES 3 'ML'138f50 Rt. 33.7 15'-0" 5'-10" 39'-6" 110-136W 240v LED III 40.0 F H90 6 'ML'143o21 Rt. 33.7 15'-0" 5'-10" 39'-6" 110-136W 240v LEO III 40D F H90 9 'ML'144.02 LI. 33.7 15'-0" 5'-10" 39'-6" 110-136W 240v LED III 40.0 F P180 POLE TABLE LEGEND • :Metal Pole and its foundation shall be according to ODOT Standard Specification&Standard Dog.Nos.TM629.TM630&TM631. ••:Field verify attachment height of arm before ordering. Values ore approximated from grading cross sections F=Fixed base illumination pole.See Std.Dwg.Nos.TM629.TM630&TM631 LED•Light Emitting Diode.See Special Provisions for project luminaires. (1) Attachment height of arm may vary due to difference in manufacturers arm rise BE .Base plate to Luminaire height. HIM:Handhole orientation measured from luminaire orm clockwise direction!mangle in degrees, Pen)s Photocell orientation measured from luminaire arm clockwise direction!mangle in degrees, Tmne sumo.Ap.wel OREGON DEPARTMENT `1°; c*NO PJROF q OF TRANSPORTATION •� 5 04% 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- SW OMARA ST PROJECT gwy, BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY 1 1 WASHINGTON COUNTY uxn HL.e moe � 21 CQ` NNW.:J.Omer Review.:S.Thommon 00000 '<+"DON R. � C)CRC3 a. e.M.Mao eFOTS.NO. 00000 eS 3 Dec. ‘' DETAILS SMUT NO. MEO2 FINAL TS_K23509_sg_ad_01.dgn::ME02 I0/23/2025 6:4E31 PM hwye091 AMIABLE VP.REQUEST 59V-025 —z—mot J' 3 3 7N wi 3 3 io< w ® © w r r r r r rr ND W-2 ( ac T J -il� RX W 2 R% D J J ® —CD ® W-2 WD-2 -c \ va 3 (b lD Y O -A. n N W p pa�PtASI p C y Ln,,,,,.._. , Nc - I I ° b' - _—_ Install RdM rv@2P0� 11Noses 2— ��" I.v_ ---- 1 1 T•� 1 . _�I r I0 I aP / . ti ye. J) 1 I I I I h ..�r s _ 3:0 11 ioF is • _ © ; w� w��° >W ~ 41 1 tT n' 41 LEG E N D RK D Remove extg. double no-pass two 4-yellow lines RW-2 Remove extg. 8'white line ACCOMPOMIED BY CMGS.: W-2 lost. 8'white line TM500,TM503,TM515,TM510, 50 25 D SO TM530,and TM560. FEET OInst. 4'yellow line ND lost. narrow double no-pass two 4-yellow lines `0 PROf4f OREGON DEPARTMENT �V5 �NGINF O,G9 OF TRANSPORTATION �� CDInst. R-white dotted line General Notes. l I.Dimensions,March points to existing striping,and station call-outs are approximate and shall be field verified. �Q7��Y- 0R141(SW HALL BLVD):FANNO CREEK TRAIL- Inst. standard crosswalk two 1'white bars �" D SW OMARA ST PROJECT 2.Removal of existing pavement markings shown Is approximate and shall be field verfied. BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HIGHWAY ® /nst.staggered continental crosswalk 2' ✓ y 20S\ <,y - WABHINGTODN COUNTYwhite bars3.Striping(Spec.00850)on Hall Blvd(OR141)is: ,, 2 , y cevu,er r Selo -Longitudinal Pavement Markings(Spec.00865):Method A,Thermoplastic,Extruded,Surface,Profiled ones`.- Semen tS Inst.bike lane standard stencil(white) -Transverse Pavement Markings(Legends&Bars,Spec.00867):Type B-HS:Preformed,Fused Thermoplastic Film High Skid RFy D•NP Mertes 1.50u °Leak., CMao -Pavement Markers(Spec.00855)Mono-Directional White and Bi-Directional Yellow.Type 1AR SKEET No RENEWS'6-30-2027 PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN QAO1 TM_K23509_stpl_01.dgn::Default 10/23/2025 1:54 47 PM hwyrl8y UPON Attachment 3 OR141 (HALL BLVD) FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING Tigard, Oregon Environmental, Social, Economic and Energy Analysis (ESEE) Prepared for: 7 Oregon Department of Transportation Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 123 NW Flanders Street Portland, Oregon 97209 Prepared by: A DOWL 309 SW 6th Avenue; Suite 700 Portland, Oregon 97204 October 2025 DOWL#2621.80187.01 ODOT#K23509 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic, and Energy Analysis October 2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 OVERVIEW OF REQUEST 5 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5 1.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE CONFLICTING USE 6 2.0 ESEE ANALAYSIS 8 2.1 ESEE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS 8 2.2 EXISTING LOCAL PROTECTIONS 8 2.3 ESEE ANALYSIS AREA DESCRIPTION 8 2.4 PROPOSED MITIGATION 10 3.0 SITE SPECIFIC ESEE ANALYSIS 12 3.1 ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES 13 3.2 SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES 14 3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 15 3.4 ENERGY CONSEQUENCES 16 3.5 CONCLUSION 17 3.6 RECOMMENDED DECISION 17 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Significant Wetland Impacts Summary 5 Page 3 BOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental, Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS BMP Best Management Practices CIP Capital Improvement Plan City City of Tigard CPA Comprehensive Plan Amendment CWS Clean Water Services DCS Design and Construction Standards DLCD Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development DSL Oregon Department of State Lands ESEE Economic, Social, Environmental and Energy GIS Geographic Information System LWI Local Wetland Inventory OAR Oregon Administrative Rules ODOT Oregon Department of Transportation ROW Right-of-Way SF Square Feet TDC Tigard Development Code VC Vegetated Corridor A Page 4 IDOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental, Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview of Request Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 (ODOT/applicant) is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the "Wetland and Streams Corridor Map" and a Sensitive Lands Review for proposed pedestrian safety improvements to the Fanno Creek Trail crossing at SW Hall Blvd (OR141). The project area is approximately 7,405 square feet(0.17 acres)located along SW Hall Blvd at the existing pedestrian crossing for the Fanno Creek Crail (see Exhibit A, Figures 5A and 5B1). This request will allow for the removal of the "significant" designation from the impacted portion of significant wetlands, which are Statewide Planning Goal 5 resources, located within ODOT right-of-way and adjacent City of Tigard (City) owned property."Significant wetlands"include both the delineated wetland and the vegetated corridor buffer areas surrounding the wetland, but the proposed project improvements are only impacting the vegetated corridor portion of significant wetlands, not the delineated wetland portion. The City does not allow any landform alterations or developments within or partially within a significant wetland, except as approved pursuant to Tigard Development Code (TDC) 18.510.080 and with a concurrent Comprehensive Plan Amendment as authorized by TDC 18.510.100. As described in TDC 18.510.100,the City allows applicants to remove Goal 5 protections of mapped significant wetlands through one of two options; an economic, social, environmental, and energy (ESEE) analysis that considers the consequences of allowing, limiting or prohibiting the proposed conflicting use, or a second option, which demonstrates that the sensitive areas no longer meet the significance threshold as defined in the Goal 5 administrative rule. The applicant is pursing option 1, the ESEE analysis for the CPA. The applicant is requesting removal of the "significant" designation from approximately 127 square feet of significant wetlands impacted by the project's proposed improvements. Table 1 below provides a summary of the size of the significant wetlands within the project area, the size of the impact areas, and the type of impacts. Exhibit A, Figure 5 shows existing conditions with the locations of significant wetlands. Exhibit A,Figure 6 shows the location of impacted areas of the significant wetlands and the types of impacts. The CPA would remove the significant designation from only the impacted areas of the significant wetlands. Table 1:Significant Wetland Impacts Summary Significant Significant Wetland Significant Wetlands Wetland Area Impact Area(sq.ft.)by Type of Impact Proposed within Project Proposed Project Area(sq.ft.) Improvements Stormwater management Significant Wetland A 649 107 infrastructure(stormwater outfalls) Significant Wetland B 69 20 Stormwater management infrastructure(stormwater outfalls) Total 718 127 1.2 Project Description The proposed project will replace the existing Fanno Creek Trail pedestrian crossing at SW Hall Blvd with a new, safer crossing. The new crossing will be a pedestrian-activated crossing, known as a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon, or RFFB. As shown on the Land Use Figures (Exhibit A)and Preliminary Design Plans (Exhibit G), proposed improvements include paving, curb ramps, signage, illumination, and RRFB pedestrian signals. As a result of proposed project improvements, including new stormwater outfalls on 1 All figures referenced in this ESEE Analysis are located within Land Use Application Exhibit A. 4 Page 5 0OWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 both sides of the roadway, impacts to City-designated sensitive lands are proposed as shown on Figure 6. Per TDC 18.510.010(G),sensitive lands are potentially unsuitable for development because of their location within the following (those underlined are present within the project area as shown on Figure 5): • The special flood hazard area(100-year floodplain)or 1996 flood inundation line; • Natural drainageways; • Significant wetland areas; • Slopes greater than 25 percent; • Significant fish and wildlife habitat areas designated on the City's "Significant Habitat Areas Map"; and • Significant tree groves shown on the City's"Significant Tree Grove Map". Per the City's "Significant Habitat Areas Map"2, there are high-value, moderate-value, and lower-value habitat areas within the project area. Per the City's "Wetlands and Streams Corridors Map"3, all wetlands within the project area are considered significant. Special flood hazard areas associated with Fanno Creek are also within the project area. The applicant has field-verified the boundaries of City-designated significant wetlands,which are shown on Figure 5 in relation to wetland boundaries identified on the City's"Wetlands and Streams Corridors Map". As shown on Figure 5, two significant wetlands are present within the project area, on both sides of SW Hall Blvd,which are proposed to be impacted as shown on Figure 6 and indicated in Table 1. 1.3 Description of the Conflicting Use The Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD) administers Statewide Planning Goal 5 Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-023-000, which states that the purpose of Goal 5 is "...to conserve and protect significant Goal 5 natural resources." Goal 5 Administrative Rule OAR 660-0023-000 identifies Goal 5 natural resources (such as wetlands and riparian/vegetated corridors) as "significant" based on the quality of their ecological functions. The Goal 5 ESEE analysis describes the economic, social, environmental, and energy consequences of allowing, limiting, or prohibiting uses that conflict with the previously documented and protected identified significant wetlands and Fanno Creek vegetated corridors within the project area. Goal 5 Administrative Rule OAR 660-023-0010 defines "conflicting use"as follows: (1) "Conflicting use"is a land use, or other activity reasonably and customarily subject to land use regulations, that could adversely affect a significant Goal 5 resource (except as provided in OAR 660-023-0180(1)(b)). Local governments are not required to regard agricultural practices as conflicting uses. Goal 5 Administrative Rule (OAR 660-023-0040)describes how conflicting uses are identified: (2)Identify conflicting uses.Local governments shall identify conflicting uses that exist,or could occur, with regard to significant Goal 5 resource sites. To identify these uses, local governments shall examine land uses allowed outright or conditionally within the zones applied to the resource site and in its impact area. Local governments are not required to consider allowed uses that would be unlikely to occur in the impact area because existing permanent uses occupy the site. The following shall also apply in the identification of conflicting uses: (a) If no uses conflict with a significant resource site, acknowledged policies and land use regulations may be considered sufficient to protect the resource site. The determination that 2 https://www.tigardmaps.com/MapGalleryPDFs/f env regulation/a siq_habitat/sign hab3444.pdf 3 https://www.tigardmaps.com/MapGalleryPDFs/f env regulation/b wetland stream/wet srtrm cor3444.pdf Page 6 °OWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 there are no conflicting uses must be based on the applicable zoning rather than ownership of the site. (therefore,public ownership of a site does not by itself support a conclusion that there are no conflicting uses.) (b) A local government may determine that one or more significant Goal 5 resource sites are conflicting uses, with another significant resource site. The local government shall determine the level of protection for each significant site using the ESEE process and/or the requirements in OAR 660-023-0090 through 660-023-0230(see OAR 660-023-0020(1)). For this ESEE analysis,the conflicting use is the proposed RRFB crossing,and the associated stormwater outfalls which impact functioning significant wetlands. This document focuses only on significant wetlands and does not include a significant habitat evaluation, which is an incentive based, non-regulatory element of the City's regulatory framework. Page 7 ID O W L OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental, Social, Economic, and Energy Analysis October 2025 2.0 ESEE ANALAYSIS 2.1 ESEE Analysis Requirements This ESEE analysis is based on a project design that requires impacts to areas of significant wetlands that are Goal 5 resources and protected.The significant wetland areas are portions of larger wetland complexes adjacent to Fanno Creek. An ESEE analysis evaluates the trade-offs associated with different levels of natural resource protection. As required by the Goal 5 Rule,the evaluation process identifies the consequences of allowing, limiting,or prohibiting conflicting uses in areas containing significant natural resources. Pursuant to the Goal 5 Rule and TDC Section 18.510.100.B, the ESEE analysis requires the following steps: 1. The analysis must consider the ESEE consequences of building the proposed conflicting use, considering both the impacts on the specific resource site and providing a comparison with other comparable sites within the Tigard Planning Area; 2. The ESEE analysis must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city council that the adverse economic consequences of not allowing the conflicting use are sufficient to justify the loss, or partial loss, of the resource; 3. The ESEE analysis must demonstrate why the use cannot be located on buildable land, consistent with the provisions of this chapter, and that there are no other sites within the Tigard Planning Area that can meet the specific needs of the proposed use; 4. The ESEE analysis must be prepared by a team consisting of a wildlife biologist or wetlands ecologist and a land use planner or land use attorney, all of whom are qualified in their respective fields and experienced in the preparation of Goal 5 ESEE analysis; 5. If the application is approved, then the ESEE analysis must be incorporated by reference into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and the "Tigard Wetland and Stream Corridor Map" will be amended to remove the site from the inventory. 2.2 Existing Local Protections As shown on Figure 3, the project area is located entirely within SW Hall Blvd/OR141 ROW and is zoned Parks and Recreation (PR). Overlay zones, plan districts, inventoried hazards, and/or sensitive lands are subject to additional regulations.The requested Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is subject to a Type III Modified review process (see TDC 18.710.080). In addition, development within or near sensitive lands triggers review under the City's Sensitive Lands overlay(see TDC 18.510). The Sensitive Lands chapter(TDC 18.510) outlines the permitted and regulated activities and uses within sensitive lands,as well as defines the review and approval processes for development consideration based on the type and intensity of the impact. The chapter also outlines the process for variance and comprehensive plan amendment requests. 2.3 ESEE Analysis Area Description 2.3.1. Existing Conditions The project area shown on Figures 5A and 5B, which is entirely within right-of-way associated with SW Hall Blvd/OR141. The project area contains City-designated significant wetlands per the City's "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map", riparian habitat areas, and special flood hazard areas (100-year floodplain) associated with Fanno Creek.Vegetation is also present within the project area, including trees of varying sizes,shrubs, and underbrush. The proposed project is occurring within existing right-of-way associated with SW Hall Blvd. Because the proposed project is intended to create a safer pedestrian crossing for the Fanno Creek Trail, the proposed project improvements must occur in the approximate location of the existing crossing in order to align and L Page 8 BOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 connect to the trail on either side of the roadway. Opportunities to design the improvements for further avoidance of sensitive lands are limited. 2.3.2. Site Alterations The site alteration description is based on readily available historical information and information from the following documents prepared for the project: • Land Use Application Exhibit H—Clean Water Services(CWS)Standard Site Assessment(DOWL, October 2025) • Land Use Application Exhibit F—Wetland Delineation Report(ODOT, August 2025) Prior to the area's urbanization beginning in the 1960s,the area accommodated agricultural uses, including fruit orchards and berry farms. Historic site alterations include the construction of SW Hall Blvd/OR141,the Fanno Creek Trail, and the existing crosswalk infrastructure, all of which may have impacted pre-existing natural resources, vegetation and drainage patterns. Improvements to the Fanno Creek Trail in the project area's vicinity were recently completed in November, 2024. No other recent site alterations were observed that would affect the current presence of or distribution of wetlands within the project area. 2.3.3. Significant Wetland Descriptions The significant wetlands in this ESEE analysis are Significant Wetlands A and B.These significant wetlands are a portion of larger wetland areas that extend beyond the project area boundary. The wetlands outside of the project area do not have field verified boundaries. The boundaries shown are taken from the Tigard Wetland Inventory Map and publicly available geographic information system (GIS) data and may not be shown in their entirety. They are provided to illustrate the approximate location and scale of additional wetland areas in the vicinity of the project area. The buffer width per the TDC included within each of the significant wetland boundaries is 50 feet. Technical information for the significant wetlands is found in the following documents. The following documents also provided information for the wetland descriptions in this ESEE analysis: • Land Use Application Exhibit H—Clean Water Services(CWS)Standard Site Assessment(DOWL, October 2025) • Land Use Application Exhibit F—Wetland Delineation Report(ODOT,August 2025) Figure 5 includes both the field-verified significant wetlands and the significant wetland areas as mapped within the Tigard Local Wetland Inventory map. Detailed descriptions of the significant wetlands follow, along with descriptions of the proposed project impacts for each. Figure 5 shows existing conditions with the locations of significant wetlands, as well as other project area features, including SW Hall Blvd/OR141 and the Fanno Creek Trail. Figure 6 shows the location of impacted areas of significant wetlands and resulting from the project,as well as proposed project improvements,and some erosion control measures to be used during construction.The CPA would remove the significant designation from only the impacted areas of the significant wetlands. Table 1 provides a summary of the size of the significant wetlands and Fanno Creek vegetated corridor areas, impact areas, and the types of impacts being proposed. Significant Wetland A Within the project area, Significant Wetland A is approximately 649 SF and lies west of SW Hall Blvd/OR141, extending beyond the project area limits to the north and west. Only the VC/buffer portion of Significant Wetland A is within the project area, with the entire delineated wetland located outside of the project area.There are two VC/buffer communities that are a part of Significant Wetland A within the project area: VC 2 and VC 3. VC 2 consists of native tree, shrub, and herbaceous species. Vegetation species include Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia), black hawthorn, swamp rose (Rosa palustris), and other less dominant species, and the presence of invasive species is low. This VC/buffer is considered to have good Page 9 DOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 canopy cover and is considered to be in good condition. VC 3 is dominated by a landscape mix of grasses (Poaceae family). This community has little to no canopy cover and is a mowed and managed community with low species diversity. This community is considered to be in degraded condition. The total proposed impact to Significant Wetland A is approximately 107 SF. Impacts will be to VC 3 only with no impacts proposed to VC 2 or the delineated wetland. Proposed impacts are occurring from stormwater outfalls and spillways. See Figure 5 for the location of Significant Wetland A and Figure 6 for proposed project impact areas. Significant Wetland B Within the project area, Significant Wetland B is approximately 69 SF and lies east of SW Hall Blvd/OR141, extending beyond the project area limits to the east. Only the VC/buffer portion of Significant Wetland B is within the project area, with the entire delineated wetland located outside the project area.VC 4 is the only VC/buffer community that is a part of Significant Wetland B. VC 4 is dominated by native and non-native shrub and herbaceous species. Vegetation species include Oregon grape and Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and other less dominant species. There is little to no canopy cover and this community is considered be in degraded condition. The total proposed impact to Significant Wetland B is approximately 20 square feet. Impacts will be to VC 4 with no impacts proposed to the delineated wetland. Proposed impacts are occurring from a proposed stormwater outfall and spillway. See Figure 5 for the location of Significant Wetland B and Figure 6 for proposed project impact areas. 2.4 Proposed Mitigation As mentioned in Section 2.3 of this ESEE analysis and shown on Figure 6, proposed impacts to both significant wetlands are limited to the VC/buffer,with no impacts proposed to the off-site,delineated portion of the wetlands. Proposed impacts to VC/buffers are occurring due to stormwater outfalls and spillways. Proposed impacts are limited to approximately 127 SF total. Per CWS DCS subsection 3.05.6(Surface Stormwater Facilities),stormwater outfalls where the permanent encroachment area is less than 100 SF are allowed without mitigation. Proposed impacts to VC 3 (Significant Wetland A) are approximately 107 SF, which is 7 SF over the 100 SF mitigation threshold per CWS DCS Chapter 3.05.6. However,the proposed impact to VC 4(Significant Wetland B)is approximately 20 SF, which is 80 SF under the 100 SF mitigation threshold. Because the average encroachment does not exceed the total 200 SF allowance for impacts to the two VCs, and because all proposed impacts are occurring within VC with a degraded condition, mitigation is not anticipated to be required under CWS regulations. Best Management Practices ODOT proposes to use the following Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to protect significant wetlands and other natural resources. • The contractor will install orange construction fencing just outside the wetland disturbance limits to establish No Work Areas to protect the remaining portion of the significant wetland. • Inlet protection, sediment barriers, and straw wattles will be used depending on the stage of construction, and additional BMPs will be specified as necessary depending on site conditions. • Following construction, all disturbed areas be covered with fresh topsoil and mulch and will be seeded with native seed. Avoidance Measures There are no practicable alternative locations for the proposed project improvements that would completely avoid the significant wetlands. This is because the proposed RRFB crossing must be located in the approximate location of the existing crossing in order to align and connect to the trail on either side of the roadway. Proposed impacts are occurring due to stormwater management facilities located on both sides ` . Page 10 DOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social,Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 of SW Hall Blvd/OR141 and stormwater management is a necessary component of the proposed project, and existing stormwater management facilities within the project area are insufficient. The Fanno Creek Trail's crossing of SW Hall Blvd/OR141 is partially curbed, allowing stormwater to either sheet flow into the grassy vegetated roadway banks,eventually draining to Fanno Creek,or flow along the curb line to the guardrail terminal north of the SW Hall Blvd bridge over Fanno Creek, at which point water flows into Fanno Creek.The proposed VC impact includes of development of stormwater embankments to be constructed with pervious geotextile outfalls and impervious concrete splash pads to mitigate ponding. Due to wetlands located to the east and west of the project area, alternative locations for stormwater management facilities that avoid impacts are not possible. Page 11 BOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 3.0 SITE SPECIFIC ESEE ANALYSIS An ESEE analysis describes the economic, social, environmental, and energy consequences of allowing, limiting, or prohibiting conflicting uses for the proposed project within the significant wetlands in the project area limits. For the purpose of this analysis, "allow", "limit", and"prohibit"are defined as follows: Allow Conflicting Uses:"Allowing"conflicting uses means that Tigard is not applying additional protections to Significant Goal 5 Natural Resources beyond baseline protection provided by other, non-Goal 5 local, state, and/or federal requirements. This alternative emphasizes developing lands containing Significant Goal 5 Natural Resources. Limit Conflicting Uses: "Limiting" conflicting uses strikes a balance between completely developing Significant Goal 5 Natural Resources and completely protecting them.This alternative involves developing lands in ways that minimize negative environmental and economic tradeoffs, supporting the development goals embodied in local and regional land use plans, and protecting the most important Goal 5 Significant Natural Resources. Prohibiting Conflicting Uses: "Prohibiting" conflicting uses would prevent development actions that conflict with, or degrade, Significant Goal 5 Natural Resources. This scenario emphasizes resource protection. Protection measures would exceed baseline protections provided by other local, state, and/or federal requirements. For evaluation of consequences the following items are applicable for the proposed project: • Per the City of Tigard's Capital Improvement Plan(CIP),the Fanno Creek Trail crossing at SW Hall Blvd/OR141 has a history of crashes and near misses related to the trail crossing, sight distance is limited, and the existing pedestrian-activated beacon is non-compliant. • The purpose of the proposed project is to replace the existing Fanno Creek Trail pedestrian crossing at SW Hall Blvd with a new,safer crossing.The new crossing will be a pedestrian-activated crossing, known as a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon, or RFFB. • Existing stormwater management infrastructure within the project area is insufficient and new stormwater management infrastructure is a necessary component of the proposed project in order to meet ODOT design requirements. • Proposed impacts to Significant Wetlands A and B are occurring to the VC/buffer only and not the delineated wetland. • Because the average encroachment does not exceed the total 200 SF allowance for impacts to the two VCs, and because all proposed impacts are occurring within VC with a degraded condition, mitigation is not anticipated to be required under CWS regulations. Page 12 ['OWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 3.1 Economic Consequences Consequences of Allowing Consequences of Limiting Consequences of Prohibiting • Allowing the new crossing without • Limiting the conflicting use by requiring • VC/buffer areas would not be further protections, including the stormwater compliance with applicable regulations impacted and would remain in their management infrastructure that is of the TDC, as well as the use of the current state with no project-related proposed to impact the VC/buffer avoidance measures and BMPs impacts. Given the VC/buffers areas, could have a mostly positive described in Section 2.4, allows the proposed to be impacted are in a economic impact because the new, proposed project to be constructed as degraded state,the economic benefit of safer crossing could be installed, designed. fully protecting them is likely minimal. increasing the usability of the Fanno Creek Trail which is a key off-street • Because the proposed project could be • Without adequate stormwater component of Tigard's transportation constructed as designed, the economic management infrastructure, the new, system, benefiting local businesses and consequences of limiting the conflicting safer RRFB crossing could not be residents. use, including the necessary constructed. If the Fanno Creek Trail is stormwater management infrastructure, seen as unsafe because of the existing • The Fanno Creek Trail is also a are similar to the consequences of crossing,Tigard's perceived livability recreational asset for Tigard and allowing the use without protections. could be harmed,thereby limiting contributes to its livability and economic While the VC/buffer impacts would still Tigard's economy and vitality. •vitality. The proposed RRFB crossing demonstrates that Tigard is committed occur, impacts are being limited to only • ODOT is proposing a fee-in-lieu to creating safe transportation systems the degraded VC/buffers. Given their payment for stormwater treatment that meet all of its residents' needs, degraded state, the economic benefits obligations,which will help fund which could have positive economic of fully protecting the VC/buffers and regional stormwater management consequences due to increases in the thereby limiting the proposed project projects, such as stream City's perceived livability. from proceeding as designed, are likely enhancements,system improvements, limited. treatment facility upgrades, and maintenance of existing systems. Prohibiting the conflicting use means this benefit would not be provided. 4 -- Page 13 DOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social,Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 3.2 Social Consequences Consequences of Allowing Consequences of Limiting Consequences of Prohibiting • Allowing the conflicting use without • Limiting the conflicting use by requiring • VC/buffer areas would not be further protection means the project could be compliance with applicable regulations impacted and would remain in their constructed as designed, resulting in a of the TDC, as well as the avoidance current state with no project-related safer pedestrian crossing for trail users. measures and MBPS described in impacts. Given the VC/buffers Increasing the safety of the Fanno Section 2.4, allows the proposed proposed to be impacted are in a Creek Trail could have positive effects project to be constructed as designed, degraded state, the positive social on the health, safety, and welfare of the meaning the social consequences of consequences of fully protecting them general public,while also increasing limiting the use are generally the same may be minimal. Tigard's perceived livability. as if it was allowed without protections. • ODOT is proposing a fee-in-lieu • ODOT is proposing a fee-in-lieu payment for stormwater treatment payment for stormwater treatment obligations,which will help fund obligations,which will help fund regional stormwater management regional stormwater management projects, such as stream projects, such as stream enhancements,system improvements, enhancements, system improvements, treatment facility upgrades, and treatment facility upgrades, and maintenance of existing systems. maintenance of existing systems,which Prohibiting the conflicting use means could have broadly positive social this benefit would not be provided. consequences. • Failing to construct the proposed • VC/buffer areas could be impacted project could reduce Tigard's livability, without protections, such as the given the Fanno Creek Trail is a avoidance measures and BMPs regional draw and a key piece of described in Section 2.4. However, Tigard's multi-modal transportation given the VC/buffers proposed to be infrastructure. impacted are in a degraded state, the negative social consequences of not protecting them could be minimal, especially given the ample positive consequences of the proposed project. 4• Page 14 BOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 3.3 Environmental Consequences Consequences of Allowing Consequences of Limiting Consequences of Prohibiting • VC/buffer areas could be impacted • Limiting the conflicting use by requiring • VC/buffer areas would not be further without protections, such as the compliance with applicable regulations impacted and would remain in their avoidance measures and BMPs of the TDC, as well as the avoidance current state with no project-related described in Section 2.4. However, measures and MBPS described in impacts. Given the VC/buffers given the VC/buffers proposed to be Section 2.4, allows the proposed proposed to be impacted are in a impacted are in a degraded state, the project to be constructed as designed, degraded state,the positive negative environmental consequences meaning the environmental environmental consequences of fully of not protecting them could be consequences of limiting the use are protecting them may be minimal. minimal. generally the same as if it was allowed without protections. • ODOT is proposing a fee-in-lieu • Allowing the conflicting use without payment for stormwater treatment protection means the project could be obligations,which will help fund constructed as designed, resulting in a regional stormwater management safer pedestrian crossing for trail users. projects, such as stream Increasing the safety of the Fanno enhancements, system improvements, Creek Trail means it's a more viable treatment facility upgrades, and transportation method for users who maintenance of existing systems. may be risk-averse. More trail users Prohibiting the conflicting use means could mean less vehicle trips,which this benefit would not be provided. could have broadly positive environmental impacts. • ODOT is proposing a fee-in-lieu payment for stormwater treatment obligations,which will help fund regional stormwater management projects, such as stream enhancements, system improvements, treatment facility upgrades, and maintenance of existing systems,which could have broadly positive environmental consequences. L Page 15 D O W L. OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental, Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 3.4 Energy Consequences Consequences of Allowing Consequences of Limiting Consequences of Prohibiting • Allowing the conflicting use without • Limiting the conflicting use by requiring • Prohibiting the conflicting use could protection means the project could be compliance with applicable regulations result in the temporary elimination of constructed as designed, resulting in a of the TDC, as well as the avoidance fuel consumption by construction safer pedestrian crossing for trail users. measures and MBPS described in vehicles and construction works Increasing the safety of the Fanno Section 2.4, allows the proposed travelling to the project area,which Creek Trail means it's a more viable project to be constructed as designed, could be a positive consequence. transportation method for users who meaning the energy consequences of may be risk-averse. More trail users limiting the use are generally the same • Prohibiting the conflicting use means could mean less vehicle trips and as if it was allowed without protections. the proposed project as a whole could traffic,which could have broadly not be constructed, reducing the positive energy impacts. viability of one of the City's main off- street pedestrian trails. Without the • Allowing the conflicting use without new, safer pedestrian crossing, some protections could result in a temporary users may choose to drive for local increase in fuel consumption due to trips,which could result in an increase construction activity and construction in fuel consumption. workers travelling to the project area, which could be a negative energy consequence. A Page 16 BOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 3.5 Conclusion The applicant's proposal provides a thorough analysis of the relative trade-offs between the City's natural resource protection intentions for significant wetlands and the need to provide safer transportation facilities for residents, commerce, and drivers. The proposed project will replace the existing Fanno Creek Trail pedestrian crossing at SW Hall Blvd with a new, safer RRFB crossing. The project will help to increase pedestrian safety along the Fanno Creek Trail,which is a key component of Tigard's off-street trail system, while also completing an identified project on the City of Tigard's Capital Improvement Plan. Prohibiting the conflicting use within the project's impact area would preserve the existing significant wetlands but would not advance a needed transportation safety improvement project that also provides more adequate stormwater management along this stretch of SW Hall Blvd/OR141. Given the VC/buffers proposed to be impacted were determined to be in a degraded state, the positive consequences of preserving these areas in their current state are likely minimal. Conversely, allowing the conflicting use outright, or limiting the conflicting use with proposed avoidance measures and BMPs, allows the proposed project to be constructed as designed, increasing pedestrian safety along the Fanno Creek Trail,which has broadly positive impacts across the four ESEE analysis categories. 3.6 Recommended Decision This analysis concludes that limiting the conflicting use of the proposed project would result in the most positive consequences of the three decision scenarios. A decision to limit the conflicting use results in the same positive consequences as allowing the conflicting use without protections but means the avoidance measures and BMPs described in Section 2.4 are implemented. Limiting the conflicting use also avoids many of the negative consequences attributed to prohibiting the conflicting use and importantly allows the proposed project to proceed as designed. A Page 17 DOWL EXHIBIT C OR141 (HALL BLVD) FANNO CREEK TRAIL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING Tigard, Oregon Environmental, Social, Economic and Energy Analysis (ESEE) Prepared for: Oregon Department of Transportation Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 123 NW Flanders Street Portland, Oregon 97209 Prepared by: A DOWL 309 SW 6th Avenue; Suite 700 Portland, Oregon 97204 October 2025 DOWL#2621.80187.01 ODOT#K23509 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental, Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 OVERVIEW OF REQUEST 5 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5 1.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE CONFLICTING USE 6 2.0 ESEE ANALAYSIS 8 2.1 ESEE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS 8 2.2 EXISTING LOCAL PROTECTIONS 8 2.3 ESEE ANALYSIS AREA DESCRIPTION 8 2.4 PROPOSED MITIGATION 10 3.0 SITE SPECIFIC ESEE ANALYSIS 12 3.1 ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES 13 3.2 SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES 14 3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 15 3.4 ENERGY CONSEQUENCES 16 3.5 CONCLUSION 17 3.6 RECOMMENDED DECISION 17 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Significant Wetland Impacts Summary 5 Page 3 ID OWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS BMP Best Management Practices CIP Capital Improvement Plan City City of Tigard CPA Comprehensive Plan Amendment CWS Clean Water Services DCS Design and Construction Standards DLCD Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development DSL Oregon Department of State Lands ESEE Economic, Social, Environmental and Energy GIS Geographic Information System LWI Local Wetland Inventory OAR Oregon Administrative Rules ODOT Oregon Department of Transportation ROW Right-of-Way SF Square Feet TDC Tigard Development Code VC Vegetated Corridor 4 Page 4 DOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental, Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview of Request Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 (ODOT/applicant) is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the "Wetland and Streams Corridor Map" and a Sensitive Lands Review for proposed pedestrian safety improvements to the Fanno Creek Trail crossing at SW Hall Blvd (OR141). The project area is approximately 7,405 square feet(0.17 acres)located along SW Hall Blvd at the existing pedestrian crossing for the Fanno Creek Crail (see Exhibit A, Figures 5A and 5B1). This request will allow for the removal of the "significant" designation from the impacted portion of significant wetlands, which are Statewide Planning Goal 5 resources, located within ODOT right-of-way and adjacent City of Tigard (City) owned property."Significant wetlands"include both the delineated wetland and the vegetated corridor buffer areas surrounding the wetland, but the proposed project improvements are only impacting the vegetated corridor portion of significant wetlands, not the delineated wetland portion. The City does not allow any landform alterations or developments within or partially within a significant wetland, except as approved pursuant to Tigard Development Code (TDC) 18.510.080 and with a concurrent Comprehensive Plan Amendment as authorized by TDC 18.510.100. As described in TDC 18.510.100,the City allows applicants to remove Goal 5 protections of mapped significant wetlands through one of two options; an economic, social, environmental, and energy (ESEE) analysis that considers the consequences of allowing, limiting or prohibiting the proposed conflicting use, or a second option, which demonstrates that the sensitive areas no longer meet the significance threshold as defined in the Goal 5 administrative rule. The applicant is pursing option 1, the ESEE analysis for the CPA. The applicant is requesting removal of the "significant" designation from approximately 127 square feet of significant wetlands impacted by the project's proposed improvements. Table 1 below provides a summary of the size of the significant wetlands within the project area, the size of the impact areas, and the type of impacts. Exhibit A, Figure 5 shows existing conditions with the locations of significant wetlands. Exhibit A,Figure 6 shows the location of impacted areas of the significant wetlands and the types of impacts. The CPA would remove the significant designation from only the impacted areas of the significant wetlands. Table 1: Significant Wetland Impacts Summary Significant Significant Wetland Significant Wetlands Wetland Area Impact Area(sq.ft.)by Type of Impact Proposed within Project Proposed Project Area(sq.ft.) Improvements Stormwater management Significant Wetland A 649 107 infrastructure(stormwater outfalls) Significant Wetland B 69 20 Stormwater management infrastructure (stormwater outfalls) Total 718 127 1.2 Project Description The proposed project will replace the existing Fanno Creek Trail pedestrian crossing at SW Hall Blvd with a new, safer crossing. The new crossing will be a pedestrian-activated crossing, known as a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon, or RFFB.As shown on the Land Use Figures (Exhibit A)and Preliminary Design Plans (Exhibit G), proposed improvements include paving, curb ramps, signage, illumination, and RRFB pedestrian signals. As a result of proposed project improvements, including new stormwater outfalls on 1 All figures referenced in this ESEE Analysis are located within Land Use Application Exhibit A. L Page 5 IDOWI_ OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 both sides of the roadway, impacts to City-designated sensitive lands are proposed as shown on Figure 6. Per TDC 18.510.010(G),sensitive lands are potentially unsuitable for development because of their location within the following (those underlined are present within the project area as shown on Figure 5): • The special flood hazard area (100-year floodplain)or 1996 flood inundation line; • Natural drainageways; • Significant wetland areas; • Slopes greater than 25 percent; • Significant fish and wildlife habitat areas designated on the City's"Significant Habitat Areas Map"; and • Significant tree groves shown on the City's"Significant Tree Grove Map". Per the City's "Significant Habitat Areas Map"2, there are high-value, moderate-value, and lower-value habitat areas within the project area. Per the City's "Wetlands and Streams Corridors Map"3, all wetlands within the project area are considered significant. Special flood hazard areas associated with Fanno Creek are also within the project area. The applicant has field-verified the boundaries of City-designated significant wetlands,which are shown on Figure 5 in relation to wetland boundaries identified on the City's"Wetlands and Streams Corridors Map". As shown on Figure 5, two significant wetlands are present within the project area, on both sides of SW Hall Blvd,which are proposed to be impacted as shown on Figure 6 and indicated in Table 1. 1.3 Description of the Conflicting Use The Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD) administers Statewide Planning Goal 5 Administrative Rule (OAR)660-023-000, which states that the purpose of Goal 5 is"...to conserve and protect significant Goal 5 natural resources." Goal 5 Administrative Rule OAR 660-0023-000 identifies Goal 5 natural resources (such as wetlands and riparian/vegetated corridors) as "significant" based on the quality of their ecological functions. The Goal 5 ESEE analysis describes the economic, social, environmental, and energy consequences of allowing, limiting, or prohibiting uses that conflict with the previously documented and protected identified significant wetlands and Fanno Creek vegetated corridors within the project area. Goal 5 Administrative Rule OAR 660-023-0010 defines"conflicting use"as follows: (1) "Conflicting use"is a land use, or other activity reasonably and customarily subject to land use regulations, that could adversely affect a significant Goal 5 resource (except as provided in OAR 660-023-0180(1)(b)). Local governments are not required to regard agricultural practices as conflicting uses. Goal 5 Administrative Rule (OAR 660-023-0040)describes how conflicting uses are identified: (2)Identify conflicting uses.Local governments shall identify conflicting uses that exist,or could occur, with regard to significant Goal 5 resource sites. To identify these uses, local governments shall examine land uses allowed outright or conditionally within the zones applied to the resource site and in its impact area. Local governments are not required to consider allowed uses that would be unlikely to occur in the impact area because existing permanent uses occupy the site. The following shall also apply in the identification of conflicting uses: (a) If no uses conflict with a significant resource site, acknowledged policies and land use regulations may be considered sufficient to protect the resource site. The determination that 2 https://www.tigardmaps.com/MapGalleryPDFs/f env regulation/a siq habitat/sign hab3444.pdf 3 https://www.tigardmaps.com/MapGalleryPDFs/f env regulation/b wetland stream/wet srtrm cor3444.pdf Page 6 D O W L OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 there are no conflicting uses must be based on the applicable zoning rather than ownership of the site. (therefore,public ownership of a site does not by itself support a conclusion that there are no conflicting uses.) (b) A local government may determine that one or more significant Goal 5 resource sites are conflicting uses, with another significant resource site. The local government shall determine the level of protection for each significant site using the ESEE process and/or the requirements in OAR 660-023-0090 through 660-023-0230(see OAR 660-023-0020(1)). For this ESEE analysis,the conflicting use is the proposed RRFB crossing,and the associated stormwater outfalls which impact functioning significant wetlands. This document focuses only on significant wetlands and does not include a significant habitat evaluation, which is an incentive based, non-regulatory element of the City's regulatory framework. 4 Page 7 BOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental, Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 2.0 ESEE ANALAYSIS 2.1 ESEE Analysis Requirements This ESEE analysis is based on a project design that requires impacts to areas of significant wetlands that are Goal 5 resources and protected.The significant wetland areas are portions of larger wetland complexes adjacent to Fanno Creek. An ESEE analysis evaluates the trade-offs associated with different levels of natural resource protection. As required by the Goal 5 Rule, the evaluation process identifies the consequences of allowing, limiting, or prohibiting conflicting uses in areas containing significant natural resources. Pursuant to the Goal 5 Rule and TDC Section 18.510.100.B, the ESEE analysis requires the following steps: 1. The analysis must consider the ESEE consequences of building the proposed conflicting use, considering both the impacts on the specific resource site and providing a comparison with other comparable sites within the Tigard Planning Area; 2. The ESEE analysis must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city council that the adverse economic consequences of not allowing the conflicting use are sufficient to justify the loss, or partial loss, of the resource; 3. The ESEE analysis must demonstrate why the use cannot be located on buildable land, consistent with the provisions of this chapter,and that there are no other sites within the Tigard Planning Area that can meet the specific needs of the proposed use; 4. The ESEE analysis must be prepared by a team consisting of a wildlife biologist or wetlands ecologist and a land use planner or land use attorney, all of whom are qualified in their respective fields and experienced in the preparation of Goal 5 ESEE analysis; 5. If the application is approved, then the ESEE analysis must be incorporated by reference into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and the "Tigard Wetland and Stream Corridor Map" will be amended to remove the site from the inventory. 2.2 Existing Local Protections As shown on Figure 3, the project area is located entirely within SW Hall Blvd/OR141 ROW and is zoned Parks and Recreation (PR). Overlay zones, plan districts, inventoried hazards, and/or sensitive lands are subject to additional regulations.The requested Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is subject to a Type III Modified review process (see TDC 18.710.080). In addition, development within or near sensitive lands triggers review under the City's Sensitive Lands overlay(see TDC 18.510). The Sensitive Lands chapter(TDC 18.510) outlines the permitted and regulated activities and uses within sensitive lands,as well as defines the review and approval processes for development consideration based on the type and intensity of the impact. The chapter also outlines the process for variance and comprehensive plan amendment requests. 2.3 ESEE Analysis Area Description 2.3.1. Existing Conditions The project area shown on Figures 5A and 5B, which is entirely within right-of-way associated with SW Hall Blvd/OR141. The project area contains City-designated significant wetlands per the City's `Wetland and Streams Corridors Map", riparian habitat areas, and special flood hazard areas (100-year floodplain) associated with Fanno Creek. Vegetation is also present within the project area, including trees of varying sizes, shrubs, and underbrush. The proposed project is occurring within existing right-of-way associated with SW Hall Blvd. Because the proposed project is intended to create a safer pedestrian crossing for the Fanno Creek Trail,the proposed project improvements must occur in the approximate location of the existing crossing in order to align and Page 8 °OWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental, Social, Economic, and Energy Analysis October 2025 connect to the trail on either side of the roadway. Opportunities to design the improvements for further avoidance of sensitive lands are limited. 2.3.2. Site Alterations The site alteration description is based on readily available historical information and information from the following documents prepared for the project: • Land Use Application Exhibit H—Clean Water Services(CWS)Standard Site Assessment(DOWL, October 2025) • Land Use Application Exhibit F—Wetland Delineation Report(ODOT, August 2025) Prior to the area's urbanization beginning in the 1960s, the area accommodated agricultural uses, including fruit orchards and berry farms. Historic site alterations include the construction of SW Hall Blvd/OR141,the Fanno Creek Trail, and the existing crosswalk infrastructure, all of which may have impacted pre-existing natural resources, vegetation and drainage patterns. Improvements to the Fanno Creek Trail in the project area's vicinity were recently completed in November, 2024. No other recent site alterations were observed that would affect the current presence of or distribution of wetlands within the project area. 2.3.3. Significant Wetland Descriptions The significant wetlands in this ESEE analysis are Significant Wetlands A and B.These significant wetlands are a portion of larger wetland areas that extend beyond the project area boundary.The wetlands outside of the project area do not have field verified boundaries. The boundaries shown are taken from the Tigard Wetland Inventory Map and publicly available geographic information system (GIS) data and may not be shown in their entirety. They are provided to illustrate the approximate location and scale of additional wetland areas in the vicinity of the project area. The buffer width per the TDC included within each of the significant wetland boundaries is 50 feet. Technical information for the significant wetlands is found in the following documents. The following documents also provided information for the wetland descriptions in this ESEE analysis: • Land Use Application Exhibit H—Clean Water Services(CWS)Standard Site Assessment(DOWL, October 2025) • Land Use Application Exhibit F—Wetland Delineation Report(ODOT, August 2025) Figure 5 includes both the field-verified significant wetlands and the significant wetland areas as mapped within the Tigard Local Wetland Inventory map. Detailed descriptions of the significant wetlands follow, along with descriptions of the proposed project impacts for each. Figure 5 shows existing conditions with the locations of significant wetlands, as well as other project area features, including SW Hall Blvd/OR141 and the Fanno Creek Trail. Figure 6 shows the location of impacted areas of significant wetlands and resulting from the project,as well as proposed project improvements,and some erosion control measures to be used during construction.The CPA would remove the significant designation from only the impacted areas of the significant wetlands. Table 1 provides a summary of the size of the significant wetlands and Fanno Creek vegetated corridor areas, impact areas, and the types of impacts being proposed. Significant Wetland A Within the project area, Significant Wetland A is approximately 649 SF and lies west of SW Hall Blvd/OR141, extending beyond the project area limits to the north and west. Only the VC/buffer portion of Significant Wetland A is within the project area, with the entire delineated wetland located outside of the project area.There are two VC/buffer communities that are a part of Significant Wetland A within the project area: VC 2 and VC 3. VC 2 consists of native tree, shrub, and herbaceous species. Vegetation species include Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia), black hawthorn, swamp rose (Rosa palustris), and other less dominant species, and the presence of invasive species is low. This VC/buffer is considered to have good L Page 9 IDOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental, Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 canopy cover and is considered to be in good condition.VC 3 is dominated by a landscape mix of grasses (Poaceae family). This community has little to no canopy cover and is a mowed and managed community with low species diversity. This community is considered to be in degraded condition. The total proposed impact to Significant Wetland A is approximately 107 SF. Impacts will be to VC 3 only with no impacts proposed to VC 2 or the delineated wetland. Proposed impacts are occurring from stormwater outfalls and spillways. See Figure 5 for the location of Significant Wetland A and Figure 6 for proposed project impact areas. Significant Wetland B Within the project area,Significant Wetland B is approximately 69 SF and lies east of SW Hall Blvd/OR141, extending beyond the project area limits to the east. Only the VC/buffer portion of Significant Wetland B is within the project area, with the entire delineated wetland located outside the project area.VC 4 is the only VC/buffer community that is a part of Significant Wetland B. VC 4 is dominated by native and non-native shrub and herbaceous species. Vegetation species include Oregon grape and Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and other less dominant species. There is little to no canopy cover and this community is considered be in degraded condition. The total proposed impact to Significant Wetland B is approximately 20 square feet. Impacts will be to VC 4 with no impacts proposed to the delineated wetland. Proposed impacts are occurring from a proposed stormwater outfall and spillway. See Figure 5 for the location of Significant Wetland B and Figure 6 for proposed project impact areas. 2.4 Proposed Mitigation As mentioned in Section 2.3 of this ESEE analysis and shown on Figure 6, proposed impacts to both significant wetlands are limited to the VC/buffer,with no impacts proposed to the off-site,delineated portion of the wetlands. Proposed impacts to VC/buffers are occurring due to stormwater outfalls and spillways. Proposed impacts are limited to approximately 127 SF total. Per CWS DCS subsection 3.05.6(Surface Stormwater Facilities),stormwater outfalls where the permanent encroachment area is less than 100 SF are allowed without mitigation. Proposed impacts to VC 3 (Significant Wetland A)are approximately 107 SF, which is 7 SF over the 100 SF mitigation threshold per CWS DCS Chapter 3.05.6. However,the proposed impact to VC 4(Significant Wetland B)is approximately 20 SF, which is 80 SF under the 100 SF mitigation threshold. Because the average encroachment does not exceed the total 200 SF allowance for impacts to the two VCs, and because all proposed impacts are occurring within VC with a degraded condition, mitigation is not anticipated to be required under CWS regulations. Best Management Practices ODOT proposes to use the following Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to protect significant wetlands and other natural resources. • The contractor will install orange construction fencing just outside the wetland disturbance limits to establish No Work Areas to protect the remaining portion of the significant wetland. • Inlet protection, sediment barriers, and straw wattles will be used depending on the stage of construction, and additional BMPs will be specified as necessary depending on site conditions. • Following construction, all disturbed areas be covered with fresh topsoil and mulch and will be seeded with native seed. Avoidance Measures There are no practicable alternative locations for the proposed project improvements that would completely avoid the significant wetlands. This is because the proposed RRFB crossing must be located in the approximate location of the existing crossing in order to align and connect to the trail on either side of the roadway. Proposed impacts are occurring due to stormwater management facilities located on both sides Page 10 BOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 of SW Hall Blvd/OR141 and stormwater management is a necessary component of the proposed project, and existing stormwater management facilities within the project area are insufficient. The Fanno Creek Trail's crossing of SW Hall Blvd/OR141 is partially curbed, allowing stormwater to either sheet flow into the grassy vegetated roadway banks, eventually draining to Fanno Creek, or flow along the curb line to the guardrail terminal north of the SW Hall Blvd bridge over Fanno Creek, at which point water flows into Fanno Creek. The proposed VC impact includes of development of stormwater embankments to be constructed with pervious geotextile outfalls and impervious concrete splash pads to mitigate ponding. Due to wetlands located to the east and west of the project area, alternative locations for stormwater management facilities that avoid impacts are not possible. L Page 11 BOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 3.0 SITE SPECIFIC ESEE ANALYSIS An ESEE analysis describes the economic, social, environmental, and energy consequences of allowing, limiting, or prohibiting conflicting uses for the proposed project within the significant wetlands in the project area limits. For the purpose of this analysis, "allow", "limit", and"prohibit"are defined as follows: Allow Conflicting Uses:"Allowing"conflicting uses means that Tigard is not applying additional protections to Significant Goal 5 Natural Resources beyond baseline protection provided by other, non-Goal 5 local, state, and/or federal requirements. This alternative emphasizes developing lands containing Significant Goal 5 Natural Resources. Limit Conflicting Uses: "Limiting" conflicting uses strikes a balance between completely developing Significant Goal 5 Natural Resources and completely protecting them.This alternative involves developing lands in ways that minimize negative environmental and economic tradeoffs, supporting the development goals embodied in local and regional land use plans, and protecting the most important Goal 5 Significant Natural Resources. Prohibiting Conflicting Uses: "Prohibiting" conflicting uses would prevent development actions that conflict with, or degrade, Significant Goal 5 Natural Resources. This scenario emphasizes resource protection. Protection measures would exceed baseline protections provided by other local, state, and/or federal requirements. For evaluation of consequences the following items are applicable for the proposed project: • Per the City of Tigard's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP),the Fanno Creek Trail crossing at SW Hall Blvd/OR141 has a history of crashes and near misses related to the trail crossing, sight distance is limited, and the existing pedestrian-activated beacon is non-compliant. • The purpose of the proposed project is to replace the existing Fanno Creek Trail pedestrian crossing at SW Hall Blvd with a new,safer crossing.The new crossing will be a pedestrian-activated crossing, known as a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon, or RFFB. • Existing stormwater management infrastructure within the project area is insufficient and new stormwater management infrastructure is a necessary component of the proposed project in order to meet ODOT design requirements. • Proposed impacts to Significant Wetlands A and B are occurring to the VC/buffer only and not the delineated wetland. • Because the average encroachment does not exceed the total 200 SF allowance for impacts to the two VCs, and because all proposed impacts are occurring within VC with a degraded condition, mitigation is not anticipated to be required under CWS regulations. Page 12 (JOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 3.1 Economic Consequences Consequences of Allowing Consequences of Limiting Consequences of Prohibiting • Allowing the new crossing without • Limiting the conflicting use by requiring • VC/buffer areas would not be further protections, including the stormwater compliance with applicable regulations impacted and would remain in their management infrastructure that is of the TDC, as well as the use of the current state with no project-related proposed to impact the VC/buffer avoidance measures and BMPs impacts. Given the VC/buffers areas, could have a mostly positive described in Section 2.4, allows the proposed to be impacted are in a economic impact because the new, proposed project to be constructed as degraded state, the economic benefit of safer crossing could be installed, designed. fully protecting them is likely minimal. increasing the usability of the Fanno Creek Trail which is a key off-street • Because the proposed project could be • Without adequate stormwater component of Tigard's transportation constructed as designed, the economic management infrastructure, the new, system, benefiting local businesses and consequences of limiting the conflicting safer RRFB crossing could not be residents. use, including the necessary constructed. If the Fanno Creek Trail is stormwater management infrastructure, seen as unsafe because of the existing • The Fanno Creek Trail is also a are similar to the consequences of crossing,Tigard's perceived livability recreational asset for Tigard and allowing the use without protections. could be harmed,thereby limiting contributes to its livability and economic While the VC/buffer impacts would still Tigard's economy and vitality. •vitality.The proposed RRFB crossing demonstrates that Tigard is committed occur, impacts are being limited to only • ODOT is proposing a fee-in-lieu to creating safe transportation systems the degraded VC/buffers. Given their payment for stormwater treatment that meet all of its residents' needs, degraded state,the economic benefits obligations,which will help fund which could have positive economic of fully protecting the VC/buffers and regional stormwater management consequences due to increases in the thereby limiting the proposed project projects, such as stream City's perceived livability. from proceeding as designed, are likely enhancements, system improvements, limited. treatment facility upgrades, and maintenance of existing systems. Prohibiting the conflicting use means this benefit would not be provided. Page 13 BOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental, Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 3.2 Social Consequences Consequences of Allowing Consequences of Limiting Consequences of Prohibiting • Allowing the conflicting use without • Limiting the conflicting use by requiring • VC/buffer areas would not be further protection means the project could be compliance with applicable regulations impacted and would remain in their constructed as designed, resulting in a of the TDC, as well as the avoidance current state with no project-related safer pedestrian crossing for trail users. measures and MBPS described in impacts. Given the VC/buffers Increasing the safety of the Fanno Section 2.4, allows the proposed proposed to be impacted are in a Creek Trail could have positive effects project to be constructed as designed, degraded state,the positive social on the health, safety, and welfare of the meaning the social consequences of consequences of fully protecting them general public,while also increasing limiting the use are generally the same may be minimal. Tigard's perceived livability. as if it was allowed without protections. • ODOT is proposing a fee-in-lieu • ODOT is proposing a fee-in-lieu payment for stormwater treatment payment for stormwater treatment obligations, which will help fund obligations,which will help fund regional stormwater management regional stormwater management projects, such as stream projects, such as stream enhancements, system improvements, enhancements,system improvements, treatment facility upgrades, and treatment facility upgrades, and maintenance of existing systems. maintenance of existing systems, which Prohibiting the conflicting use means could have broadly positive social this benefit would not be provided. consequences. • Failing to construct the proposed • VC/buffer areas could be impacted project could reduce Tigard's livability, without protections, such as the given the Fanno Creek Trail is a avoidance measures and BMPs regional draw and a key piece of described in Section 2.4. However, Tigard's multi-modal transportation given the VC/buffers proposed to be infrastructure. impacted are in a degraded state,the negative social consequences of not protecting them could be minimal, especially given the ample positive consequences of the proposed project. 4 Page 14 BOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 3.3 Environmental Consequences Consequences of Allowing Consequences of Limiting Consequences of Prohibiting • VC/buffer areas could be impacted • Limiting the conflicting use by requiring • VC/buffer areas would not be further without protections, such as the compliance with applicable regulations impacted and would remain in their avoidance measures and BMPs of the TDC, as well as the avoidance current state with no project-related described in Section 2.4. However, measures and MBPS described in impacts. Given the VC/buffers given the VC/buffers proposed to be Section 2.4, allows the proposed proposed to be impacted are in a impacted are in a degraded state,the project to be constructed as designed, degraded state,the positive negative environmental consequences meaning the environmental environmental consequences of fully of not protecting them could be consequences of limiting the use are protecting them may be minimal. minimal. generally the same as if it was allowed • ODOT is proposing a fee-in-lieu Allowing the conflicting use without without protections. • payment for stormwater treatment protection means the project could be obligations,which will help fund constructed as designed, resulting in a regional stormwater management safer pedestrian crossing for trail users. projects, such as stream Increasing the safety of the Fanno enhancements, system improvements, Creek Trail means it's a more viable treatment facility upgrades, and transportation method for users who maintenance of existing systems. may be risk-averse. More trail users Prohibiting the conflicting use means could mean less vehicle trips,which this benefit would not be provided. could have broadly positive environmental impacts. • ODOT is proposing a fee-in-lieu payment for stormwater treatment obligations,which will help fund regional stormwater management projects, such as stream enhancements, system improvements, treatment facility upgrades, and maintenance of existing systems,which could have broadly positive environmental consequences. 4 Page 15 ID O W L OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental, Social, Economic,and Energy Analysis October 2025 3.4 Energy Consequences Consequences of Allowing Consequences of Limiting Consequences of Prohibiting • Allowing the conflicting use without • Limiting the conflicting use by requiring • Prohibiting the conflicting use could protection means the project could be compliance with applicable regulations result in the temporary elimination of constructed as designed, resulting in a of the TDC, as well as the avoidance fuel consumption by construction safer pedestrian crossing for trail users. measures and MBPS described in vehicles and construction works Increasing the safety of the Fanno Section 2.4, allows the proposed travelling to the project area,which Creek Trail means it's a more viable project to be constructed as designed, could be a positive consequence. transportation method for users who meaning the energy consequences of may be risk-averse. More trail users limiting the use are generally the same • Prohibiting the conflicting use means could mean less vehicle trips and as if it was allowed without protections. the proposed project as a whole could traffic,which could have broadly not be constructed, reducing the positive energy impacts. viability of one of the City's main off- street pedestrian trails. Without the • Allowing the conflicting use without new, safer pedestrian crossing, some protections could result in a temporary users may choose to drive for local increase in fuel consumption due to trips,which could result in an increase construction activity and construction in fuel consumption. workers travelling to the project area, which could be a negative energy consequence. �[ Page 16 BOWL OR141 (Hall Blvd)Fanno Creek Trail Pedestrian Crossing Environmental,Social, Economic, and Energy Analysis October 2025 3.5 Conclusion The applicant's proposal provides a thorough analysis of the relative trade-offs between the City's natural resource protection intentions for significant wetlands and the need to provide safer transportation facilities for residents, commerce, and drivers. The proposed project will replace the existing Fanno Creek Trail pedestrian crossing at SW Hall Blvd with a new, safer RRFB crossing. The project will help to increase pedestrian safety along the Fanno Creek Trail,which is a key component of Tigard's off-street trail system, while also completing an identified project on the City of Tigard's Capital Improvement Plan. Prohibiting the conflicting use within the project's impact area would preserve the existing significant wetlands but would not advance a needed transportation safety improvement project that also provides more adequate stormwater management along this stretch of SW Hall Blvd/OR141. Given the VC/buffers proposed to be impacted were determined to be in a degraded state, the positive consequences of preserving these areas in their current state are likely minimal. Conversely, allowing the conflicting use outright, or limiting the conflicting use with proposed avoidance measures and BMPs, allows the proposed project to be constructed as designed, increasing pedestrian safety along the Fanno Creek Trail,which has broadly positive impacts across the four ESEE analysis categories. 3.6 Recommended Decision This analysis concludes that limiting the conflicting use of the proposed project would result in the most positive consequences of the three decision scenarios. A decision to limit the conflicting use results in the same positive consequences as allowing the conflicting use without protections but means the avoidance measures and BMPs described in Section 2.4 are implemented. Limiting the conflicting use also avoids many of the negative consequences attributed to prohibiting the conflicting use and importantly allows the proposed project to proceed as designed. L Page 17 BOWL