The URL can be used to link to this page

05/22/1995 -Budget Packet TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. Serving. Unincorporated Area BUDGET COMMITl`EE MEETING Monday, May 22, 1995 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 12. Adjournment Reminder: TWD Meeting 6-26-95 @ 7:00 1WB Meeting 6-14-95 @ 5:30 Executive Session: The Tigard Water District may go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. All discussions within this session are confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. kathy\twd\5-22.egn . ,_ • May 22, 1995 Members of the Budget Committee Tigard Water District 8777 SW Burnham St Tigard, Oregon 97223 Included herein is the proposed budget for the Tigard Water District for the fiscal year 1995/96 . This budget proposal is very similar to the 1994/95 budget adopted by the Board in June 1994 . The Tigard Water District budget used to include all operations and debt service of the entire Tigard water system. However due to the withdrawal of the Cities from the District in January 1994, the remaining Tigard Water District budget only includes the activities of the Tigard Water District Board and the unincorporated areas share of the remaining debt service. All other water activities are now included in the City of Tigard annual Budget . The proposed budget includes as its main source of funding an estimated beginning balance of $24, 000 . Revenues anticipated during the year are estimated at $9, 200 which provides a total of $33, 200 in resources at the discretion of the board. The proposed budget provides for attorney services and engineering services if needed. It also includes charges from the City of Tigard for staff time spent on Tigard Water District business . The proposal includes the final levy for the Tigard Water District general obligation bonds . The property tax levy is just over $34, 000 and is estimated to result in a rate of just over six cents per thousand. The budget committee must make two motions before the budget is sent on to the Board for adoption. The first is a motion to approve the property tax levy in the amount of $34, 210 for 1995/96 debt service . The second motion is to approve the proposed budget in the amount of $63, 145 as amended by the budget committee . Once approved by the budget committee, the budget will be advertised and presented to the Tigard Water District Board at a hearing in June for final adoption. Respectfully submitted Lou Anne Mortensen Budget Officer Tigard Water District Resolution No. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD WATER DISTRICT APPROVING THE BUDGET, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS, DECLARING THE AD VALOREM TAX LEVY AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS PROVIDED BY ORS 310 . 060 (2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 . Whereas, the budget for the Tigard Water District for the year beginning July 1, 1995 was duly approved and recommended to the District board by the regularly constituted budget committee at its meeting on May 22, 1995, after proceedings in accordance with Chapter 294, Oregon Revised Statutes; and Whereas a summary of the budget document as required by Chapter 294 .416 was duly published in the Tigard Times in accordance with Chapter 294 . 421; and Whereas a hearing by the Tigard Water District board on the budget document, as approved by the budget committee, was duly called and held on June 26, 1995, whereat all interested persons were afforded an opportunity to appear and be heard with respect to the budget . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard Water District Board that : Section 1 : The Board adopts the budget for 1995/96 in the total sum of $65, 785 . Section 2 : The amount for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1995 and for the purposes shown below are hereby appropriated as follows : General Fund Materials And Services 24,850 Contingency 8,350 Total 33,200 Debt Service 32,585 Total Budget 65,785 Section 3: The Tigard Water District Board hereby levies the taxes provided for in the budget. in the amount of $34, 210 and that these taxes are hereby levied upon all taxable property within the district as of July 1, 1995 . The following allocation and categorization subject to the limits of section lib, Article XI of the Oregon • Constitution constitute the above aggregate levy: Subject to General Excluded from Government Limitation the Limitation Debt Service 0 34, 210 THIS BUDGET IS HEREBY ADOPTED and appropriated by the Board of Commissioners, Tigard Water District, on June 26, 1995 . TIGARD WATER DISTRICT Beverly Froude, Board Chair Date ATTEST: Lou Ane Mortensen Budget Officer Tigard Water District Resolution No. 95-_ Page 2 • • 05/23/95 Tigard Water District Approved Budget General Fund 1995/96 Resources Adopted Proposed Approved Revenues 1994/95 1995/96 1995/96 One percent water sales 5,730 7,700 7,700 Interest Earnings 500 1,500 1,500 Total Revenues 6,230 9,200 9,200 Beginning Balance 30,075 24,000 24,000 Total Resources 36,305 33,200 33,200 Expenditures Personnel 0 0 0 Materials and Services Attorney 6,300 6,300 2,300 Financial Review 3,000 0 0 Boundary Commission dues 3,230 3,400 3,400 Election Costs 2,500 0 0 Public Relations 0 0 4,000 Meeting Notice 590 600 600 Board per diem 3,000 3,000 0 Special Districts Assoc conference 400 400 400 Travel/Food & Lodging 650 650 650 Special District Assoc Dues 100 100 100 Insurance 2,300 2,400 2,600 Engineering Services 2,500 2,500 2,500 Meeting/Staff Support 5,823 7,710 7,800 Misc 500 500 500 Total Materials and Services 30,893 27,560 24,850 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 Total Expenditures 30,893 27,560 24,850 Contingency 3,000 3,000 8,350 Total Appropriations 33,89330,560 33,200 Projected Ending Fund Balance 2,412 2.640 0 06/01/95 Tigard Water District Approved Budget Debt Service Fund 1995/96 Adopted Proposed Approved Resources 1994/95 1995/96 1995/96 Property Tax Collections 27,895 32,585 32,585 Interest Earnings 280 0 0 Total Resources 28,175 32.585 32,585 Expenditures Interest 2,303 1,629 1,629 Principal 25,592 30,956 30,956 Total Expenditures 27,895 32,585 32.585 Projected Ending Balance 280 0 0 Property Tax Summary Debt Service Requirement 27,895 32,158 32,158 Collection Rate 94% 94% 94% Levy Required to produce requirements 29,675 34.210 34.210 Projected Assessed Value 403,753,000 535,566,065 535,566,065 Projected Tax Rate per $1,000 AN 0.073 0.064 0.064 Impact on Home valued @ $100,000 7.35 6.39 6.39 05/23/95 Tigard Water District Approved Budget Expenditure Details Attorney Estimated 13 hours for the year at $175 per hour. Election Costs Election happened in March 1995 Meeting Notice Publication of board meetings, election, Budget committee, and budget hearing notices. Public Relations Funds for fliers and information for unincorporated area. Staff Support Accounting 2 hours per month 24.21 581 Meeting 10 hours per month 24.21 2,905 Ed Wegner 2 hours per month 41.56 997 Randy Volk 2 hours per month 35.93 862 Mike Miller 2 hours per month 32.76 786 Budget Total 14 hours 41.56 581 Misc Staff Time 1,088 7,800 Debt Service Debt Service Required 152,912 Levy Required (94% collection rE 162,672 District Share of Levy 34,210 Board per diem Deleted by budget committee SDA Conference 2 members attend at$200 each Travel etc. 2 members at Seaside conference room and board for 3 nights. Contingency Amount set aside for unanticipated expenditures FORM NOTICE OF BUDGET HEARING 'velooment Coletssion msbenodal June 26, to 95 -....m nor LB-1 - --- --'- 0 Beautification - ltartinazzi,Tualatin The purpose 050110 nw.thg so m.8..bod11 too "•ew"' . Ameeting dtne Tigard Water District Board rrtlbehaw or, June 26 to 95 esu.pp,a,.ebyeu Tualatin Devello nt Commission adgetComattee_ C16.m. aeiijscm Owe nt yd 7:00 waDom.et 8777 SW Burnham St., Tigard OR Tire pwpo.. ts ca eft ,,, to .:u.h.budpet)or we below. of Tualatin offices antes Tualatin y,t.,.«,n.nut,orb.30NIa„dS.00PMTN.arw�ewh.p„dp.t he rawywbayw,irg. .1995asa,pgovadWtn. Tigard Water District %mom es. euees craw* nr d [Moto atwallo.b.WaaccaragwaeurbtpMpr.o.aapyew Asurlmaydh6tndoaBpma«.Wbelow.Acopy dthe owpamay be►npxtedsoobtained st Tigard Water District K algid,weexplained below. m.......ow,.....wee 8777 SW Burnham St.- Tiaa. ant TN ard. OR between Cs 8 end-5 Pm. scenOls,that 8.045,.budget alaLrn I" 6/9/95 I Lou Ogden 1(503) 692-2000 tsw..an..1 --- ._---.--- was prepared on.beds of accounting that Is Nconslstee Ona consistent with the basis at.cca,eaw used diem the precedll year. FINANCIAL SUMMARY Major changes,It any.and heir.tea a,the budget,are explained below. . oar eveve.ao....e we, a.e'.'.M.* TOTAL Cc ALL FUNDS AAdopted8ldpet APPto+•d&' Washington f o Tigard }Duna 1, 1995`Beverly Froude 1639-4171 TNeYear-1994-BS Next Year-ttgB-9e aortal Sande. .. .-. .. FINANCIAL SUMMARY w erd Somas 414,360 416.053 Sal Outlay 906,000 243.2-so TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS Adopted Budget Approved Budget „s,na. 1 2.153. 31 1.995,338 • This Year-1094-96 Next Year-1595-9B raw. 300,x(10 400,000 • 1.tow Per.malServices -0- -0- ,e•„ve„d„. I 3.2201418 3.129,W 2.Taxi Lleetiredervl Stardom 630.893 624-.850 Der Expended.erns R.md.a•,wa 88.000 84,000 3 Tar cast opwY -0- -0- ,ppoprw.a I 993.425 989.989 4.Tar Debt service .... . _.. .. 27,895 32.585 8.075.782 8.351,197 Anticipated I -9- -0- >etlte,lwEws-600 Pron.perty me. • _ Requirements s.Tar i.anstera - --.. nnu.oge Except P,cPerI Tia+- - _. 6X025,076 6X263 till2 O.Tow ContAgenies. - ._i 3.000 8.354 paw Tame Rewired a er..e.breve . . 1 2.050.706 2 4094 U25 7.Tar All are«Eapenda«.s and Requirements .... . I -4- -O- ____-.ddanelasd,l $OIS.,782 8057,197 Tn«R.p*M n Brew.BAA la'.„ 2.050.706 2.094.025 t Tow Unappropriated or Eddng Ford Balm[. . .. . I 2.622 -Or- deny 0- p•tr I 9-T«&R.oul,.m.nte-add Ines t ex«.an e .. $4.4$4 65.795 mated .cpuyTame NaabeR.edved . .. - .- � 3$,5$5 33,627 Anticipate Id Total Resources Exch Property Taxes. AmbC.d 000. .... _ 27 R95 _ _ 72.158 mt.Almond Other Unman-1W Amos. .... Resources 11.Taw Property Taxes Required b Balance Budget - ;Law-add Moe 1,and 14 -- . .. .. ( 11 Torr Reseurcee-add avee l0 and 11 64.480 65.785 .. ... -... 13 Tar Properly Trues r n Trues Required Been.Budget( ) 27-895 32.158 NMTax eve 1 Aniicpaed 14.Plus Estimated Property Taxes Not to be Received .. I ' ' - iCaraway team I Tax Levy A Lose Due to Constitutional Lends. -R- -0- 1_780 2.052 'aymw..aBade0.61 B.al TeaLeAa-ad,Omert3end tdAmouaa.... 1 n�,..aoidh,alemurloshs 15.Tar Tax Lsvr-add Tees 13 sed 11... 29.675 210 std NPdT0F0lOE2IVAITH 16.LM Within the/as Beta _n- -D- ream Dean A.MYed,Hr Famed Tax Levees 11.One-Year Levy Oubid.the Tax Bela ... -.. I -0- -0- 344Saretwue °Nen OAs Sumw4d By Te ter.Seiw.. Cont sing Levks... - -D- -0- ------------_�._-__._. Typo ,9-Levy atPayment ofBonded Debt ... _.... .. 29-675 34.210 isIBL1aN BELOW ONLY F COsvfi7ED - 10 Tow a mea 16 throw*is leawa Tan lm S29.675 3 4 210 Debt Outstanding Debt AW,orue Not Inane STATEMENT OF INDEBTEDNESS dr 1.1995-90 Aadov.d Budget Y. .Anti 1 1903-4e Armed Boded yM Oa«Oul.tand"g Deb Atalrorixed.Na Incurred 142.$03 ❑Nene ®As Su mmei:ea I O Nan O As Summarize 4g-147 PUBLISH BELOW ONLY IF COMPLETED .71.750 Long-Tenn Debt ` Debt Outstanding Debt Aut prized,Not Incurred ....eduction r rarer...(Short-Tenn ..ube- I m Bormedny) nn+nzed baJWv 1.1595-95 Approved Bucket Year Judy 1.199590 Approved Budget Tear Estimate Mane Estimated Estimated Bods - ... C 'Tia 9SA lobe Borrowed ( Interest Rate 1 Interest cast gamest B..nn W anents f+ __- .., I S 30.956 --__- FUNDS NOT REQUIRING The budget modes Me intention a. ention to b« w 0066000n of revenue FShon-Term n.m Borrowing').s su .dzed bio, PROPERTY TAX TO BE LEVIED FUND LIABLE Estimated Amount Estmeted Estimated to be Borrowed Interest Rate Interest Cost page.Tar Anticipated Repue«n.M9 mutt equal Tar Paaac.e. DR.Pubtia don al Distric ammo", Adopted Budget Approved _ __� `- FUNDS NOT REQUIRING Last Year 1993-9 This Year 1994-95 Next Year L995- 6 FORM A PROPERTY TAX TO BE LEVIED LB-2 321,193 338.050 346.319QRep Gabon 1.115 4.000 4.000 Publish ONLY completed portionportiona his page.Taal Anticipated Requi,er,.e.ts mut equal Tar Resources. _ - .. Name of Actual Data Adopted Budget APPmVed Budget Fund General Fund Last Vear This Year 1994-95 Next Year 1995-96 31.996 93.677 a` ds' 1 Total Personal Services -0 -O 2.Tar Matensls and Services S 30.893 $ 24.850 322.,38Q 314.046 443.996 3 Total Capital Outlay -0- -0- .axes _ .( `.402,875 - -- 3] .0 . '.3 ':, 4.Tar Debt Service -0- -0- al District 5-Total Transfers - - -D- -p- al para Adopted Hldpet Approved 6.Tar Contingencies _ 3-Pon 8.350 Last YNy 1993-9 VNy 994--95 Nett Year 1995-96 7.Tar All Other EzPenda..es end Requirements. -P- -D- e.Tar Unappropriated or Endrg fund Balance 7_a 17 -O- F B.Taal Requirements SA Inc 11 200 - 34.883 37_916 17r_9Aa< ens qq Inn 4.575.6A 812.000 65{.7500 to.Taal Re:wrcesExced_er90440.ems .�, - - - FORM FUNDS REQUIRING A 2soaxi 22.5.1240 m..2,, 7S2.851 444, 1LB-3 PROPERTY TAX TO BE LEVIED N.a 75 . 4fl.00 " 44.000 • Raow6caeon d Bawer.. Publish ONLY completed portion el his page. 0 . . 4.860.512 1.925.801 1.380.342 Name o1 Actual Data I Adopted Budget I Approved Budget Fund Debt Service nit ------- Adopted{ Last Yea, This Year 1994-95 Ned Year 1995-96 ' Last Year 1993-94 The Year •9 Next Year 1grIg 1 Taat Pe.sone1 Services - . Total 2 Tal Materials and Services 201.346 3.Tar Capital Outlay. 29.297 ?6.948 4 Taal Debt Service ._ $ 27.895 1 S 12-SRS_ • ..,_ ___ 30. 91ie(9P_ -_ _ 8s.0011_______ 5 Tar Trarnslers. ' - 6 Total Conmgenc.es.. .... 10,000 25,000 2()l'',000_ 7 Total All Other Expenditures and Requirement.. - 0- I 69.194 13.469 B Taal Unapp.opnale e,Enderg Fund Balance.. 1 R n ,9dnrnenta. 4 Total Raqui.em'ems .... ...... . 7 11.5___ d Belem. 10 Total Resources Except Property Taxes - 7 qn _ -- 1 7 7 247...Al 213.491 715.417 ,I.Total Prop.Taxes ReceiveNRequeed to Balance 7 7 R 9 5 32.1s4 lana 321.937 21 - !,411 _ - 3Torsi A 75 717 12 TResources fines l0 and t l) 7179 ... 32,585 1 • --- - - - 13 Property Taxes Required to Balance(ban dee 1I) 5 7 7 Roc _5 32.158 FUNDS REQUIRING A 14 Eetimated Property Taxes Not to be Received... • PROPERTY TAX TO BE LEVIED w Loss Due locomtttironalL:na o- . B Discounts.Oh«Uncole,ed Amounts T 7 R 52 I5 Taal Tax Levy led lines 13 end le) 29-675 3..270 v 0 Repubecatl«. 16 Levy Within the Tax Base .. .. -. - 57 One-Yea.Levy Outside the Tax Base. T Actual Data Adopted Budget Approved Budget 10 Semi end Continuing Levies.... ...-.. Last Year 1993-94 TTN,Year 1994-95 Next Year 1995-96 I9 Lew la Panimaid l Badder n.M S 29,675 S 34.210 _ 4.2b4 6,815 4.wU TT8226-Publish June 8, 1995. Oregon DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Date: June 6, 1995 REGION 4 RIGHT OF WAY Tigard Water District File: R6237.017 P.O. Box 23000 Name: Tigard Water District Tigard, OR 97223 Section: Pacific Hwy-McDonald FILE CODE: Highway: Beaverton-Tualatin Hwy County: Washington FAP#: You own property needed for improvement of the above highway. This property is described on Exhibit A. A determination of Just Compensation for the needed portion of your property has been made by a qualified Appraiser, based on market information. This is the amount outlined in the attached "Acquisition Summary Statement". You also have the right to donate the property if you wish. Please sign the enclosed Easement Document Deed and have it notarized. Please return the signed document to this office in the envelope provided. When the Right of Way Manager accepts the Document, it becomes a binding agreement. Notification of acceptance and payment will follow. Should you wish to donate the property, please notify me, and I will see that you receive the necessary forms and instructions. RELOCATION BENEFITS For an outline of any relocation benefits available to you, see the "Relocation Summary Statement" which is also attached. Thank you for your cooperation and time. If you have any questions, please call me at: 388-6400. Mary Brophy (i/ Right of Way Agent Attach: Form #734-1712 63020 a B. Riley Rd. 734 2290 (_-y, Bend, OR 97701 (503) 388-6196 File : R6237.017 Name : Tigard Water Date : June 6, 1995 ACQUISITION SUMMARY STATEMENT *Land and**Improvements $ 550.00 Damages $ -0- Other -0- $ -0- TOTAL JUST COMPENSATION $ 550.00 * LAND ACQUIRED 390 S. F. Permanent Easement ** IMPROVEMENTS IN ACQUISITION AREA: 1. Landscaping & Irrigation NOTICE TO VACATE: Written notice to vacate will not be required. Possession will be upon payment. THE FOLLOWING SEPARATELY HELD OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL JUST COMPENSATION SHOWN ABOVE. 1. None Form 734-1714 (11-90) EXHIBIT A File R6237017 Pacific Hwy. W. - S.W. McDonald St. Sec. Beaverton - Tualatin Highway Washington County RDS 10-06-94 10B-1-10 Van S. Camp (Tigard Water District, C.P.) Permanent Easement for Slopes, Water, Gas, Electric and Communication Service Lines, Fixtures and Facilities. A parcel of land lying in the William Graham D.L.C. No. 39, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, W.M. , Washington County, Oregon and being a portion of that property designated as Parcel I and described in that contract to Tigard Water District, recorded as Microfilm Document No. 84-25846 of Washington County Book of Records; the said parcel being that portion of said property lying Northerly of a line at right angles to the center line of the relocated Beaverton-Tualatin Highway at Engineer's Station 127+15; Southwesterly of the right of way of Burlington Northern Inc. and included in a strip of land 40 feet in width, lying on the Westerly side of said center line which center line is described as follows: Beginning at Engineer's center line Station 112+00, said station being 4,394.57 feet North and 78.58 feet East of the Southeast corner of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, W.M. ; thence South 0° 42' 31" West 446.06 feet; thence on a 163.70 foot radius curve right (the long chord of which bears South 22° 43' 17.5" West 122.72 feet) 125.79 feet; thence South 44° 44' 04" West 455.01 feet; thence on a 179.05 foot radius curve left (the long chord of which bears South 23° 39' 52" West 128.74 feet) 131.69 feet; thence South 2° 35' 40" West 241.45 feet to Engineer's center line Station 126+00. Beginning at Engineer's center line Station 126+00, said station being 3,153.01 feet North and 357.19 feet West of the Southeast corner of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, W.M. ; thence South 2° 35' 40" West 510.56 feet to Engineer's center line Station 128+69.11. Bearings are based on County Survey No. 24,915, recorded February 11 , 1993. The parcel of land to which this description applies contains 390 square feet, more or less, outside of the existing right of way. NOTE: Non-Throughway. This parcel is located in Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, W.M. Outside Area: 4.32 acres, more or less, right. / 1 / / 3d°/ '91 61.1 / PLS 737 SURV� f°111' (3-20-87) / N. 49,625.02 Fd.iron Rod w/Red Plastic Cap / Fd. E.21,195.61 2�" brass Cop in Mon,Box 1 Marked "DEA INC.CONTROL" ''�► Marked "CITY OF TIGARD SURVEY (CS #22.155) (5-20-92) N Ox CONTROL POINT, N.49,949.89 �S 29+56.99 PGC PLS 737" E.21,112.414 •r, . 15-19-92) il N,49,765.84 r .2, E.21,095.19 ii Fd.3/" Iron Pipe 'Q (CS #22,155) (3-20-87) Fd.%8" Iron Rod / b // N.49,979.74 (3-20-87) / n // E.21.103.72 N.49.974.20 = = (CS #20.751) E.21,103.51 33 • 34 (CS #20,751) �', iG' • )e (Bent E.) # / • 2Q1 32 / 0,Y; S:1) 0°' , „.........„./ •• • ,� ''\ /, _ ... (--Al W / �'a'' 7 7 \\_ _ _ N .7(--- 017 II '' f 1 r�ox �,�. ! - \` I I ,-1,/ Fd. 23/" brass Cop �� -32,(2..'1:, n i( II in Mon.Box Marked -, y Focilities O ,• ,p i "CITY OF TIGARD • / `� i > : SURVEY CONTROL POINT. •C.1 E.21.000 iI III 5-195 06 92) PI PLS 737" II N.49.765.96 �� k Fd.%" Iron Pipe (U I E.21,076.82 (3-20-87) II lI (CS #22.155) .e..____„. p gN.50,032.05 II I� T E.21,060.04 (CS #20,751) II �' C 1 11 r �1 Icn� } ' 432 oc.t Rt. I r , _ *40 MAY 1995 WATER MONTHLY REPORT Revenues/Expenditures: Month of May Year to Date Prior Yr. to Date % of Budget Revenues: Water Sales $303,501.99 $3,645,640.24 $2,831,505.35 Meter Sales 33,770.00 415,130.00 519,135.93 Developer Fees 3,042.00 $134,208.68 96,005.54 Other Income 33,487.54 157,600.77 106,015.27 Total Revenue $373,801.53 $4,352,579.69 $3,552,662.09 114% Expenditures: Personal Services $80,324.09 $672,561.51 $763,856.08 Material Services 132,894.92 1,544,055.51 1,548,428.82 Capital Outlay 28,604.65 178,055.15 254,273.90 Cap. Proj. Res. Fund 00.00 00.00 300,000.00 *Total Expends. $241,823.66 $2,394,672.17 $2,866,558.80 65% SDC Fund: $50,267.01 $511,096.53 $665,853.68 129% SDC Fund Balance: $1,598,161.29 * City accounting system is on a cash basis Meter Installations: 5/8" x 3/4" 1" 1 1/2" 2" Total Durham 2 0 0 0 2 King City 0 0 0 0 0 Unincorporated Area 11 3 0 0 14 City of Tigard 21 0 1 1 23 Total for May 39 Water Consumption and Loss: Total 100 cubic feet of water purchased or produced 205,317 ccf Plus amount of water from storage during May and consumption not billed in April 12,500 ccf Total 100 cubic feet of water billed <185,288 ccfl Water loss from flushing new lines in subdivisions < 500 ccf5 Water loss from main breaks (SW Carmen& SW Walnut) < 1,728 ccf> Net amount of water in storage < 10,600 ccf> Amount of water consumed but not yet billed < 1Q500 ccf> Total Water loss 9,201 ccf 4%0 Q� Y K3 InterOffice Memo To: Ed Wegner From: Mike Miller Date: June 6, 1995 Subject: June 2, 1995 Oregonian Article On Friday, June 2, 1995, The Oregonian published an article on the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) briefmg paper that discussed their findings about the chemical make-up of water in 100 community water systems across the country. In addition to the article, the Oregonian published an "In Oregon" section. In this section Tigard was identified as being one of three water service agencies, serving a population base larger than 10,000, that had the most violations. The Oregonian article does not identify the standards that were violated. The article in the Oregonian states: "There is widespread violation of EPA's drinking water health standards and testing requirements, while enforcement is rare. The Safe Drinking Water Act and the source water provisions of the Clean Water Act need strengthening. Adequate funding is needed to restructure or upgrade water systems and to assure safe drinking water now and in the future. In Oregon, 1,492,000 people served by 729 community water systems have violated one or more health standards, treatment techniques, and monitoring and reporting requirements. In Oregon, there have been a total of 3,079 community water system violations". The article does not identify, nor does the NRDC briefing paper, what standards were violated. The article also does not state how or where EPA enforcement efforts might be improved. The City of Tigard makes every effort to comply with regulations and supports research efforts that identifies compliance activities that meet the intent of the law as well as give our customers good return for their rate dollar. After reviewing the Oregonian article, I contacted Mr. Dave Leland, Manager of the Oregon Health Division's Drinking Water Program, and found that the only violation that Tigard had was due to some confusion with the population base of our service area. The confusion occurred in December 1994, when the Health Division records indicated that our population base was higher than what we were reporting. The number of monthly routine water samples is determined by population. Because of the confusion, we came up two samples short for the month of December. This was technically a violation of the Safe Drinking Water Act, but was very minor, and was nothing more than a clerical error. We collected additional samples in January and have since adjusted the total number of samples to be taken each month based on the Health Divisions population base foz our service area. . Mr. Leland stated that minor violations, such as this one in our service area, are reported in a data base to the EPA. The data base does not distinguish between the severity of the THE OREGONIAN,FRIDAY,JUNE 2, .1995 Nal • Re._,,,,pos,,rets :find,:pollution, €poisous 3. �j�:`s�- - ),:'T�f. aw '. �.!.. fix.... .1tapwaterdrunkby, '�'�-,:',_ 's- `"±?in millions '. A 3 t ■Twoenvtronmentai groups say - 1N OREGON to reduce;contamination'in rest tpe data Unk 1,200'deaths and 7' Vohs that supply tapwater. niallai CBSeS Of iii S--.1-l.- u.,. What ourrstudiessshow is--th - w The report documented 3,079 vi- our water laws need to be strengt t0 l�tltatl$k1atett water .-. citations by Oregon water systems - ened,-- not relaxed,,' said Enviro t1.4. •"•->'.� ;�•,;.";;�:._:_-� .:�Y . .:,.. ,� serving almost 1.5 million people. - '. mental Working Group Preside BGARY LEE ;s_'� c= /: -.The three Oregon water systems - Ken Cook.."This.is'America.It's tl 1'A,limes-.Washingtoir Post Sendce -with the most violations of safe••.' -a 1990s.People should be provided Ix ,��.�_•<�s�r:�r:-;i�;.,--.- �_y�r.<:.-..` • '`•drinking=water standards In 1993 �"ter water_-thaazi•�-wtpiit :they're g WASHINGTON., More than 53.:--- and 1994 were the Riddle/Russell - tom• -'�5 e*" _ - ' million Americans are'chinking tap„• ,'Creek and Seaside water d Critics attacked the two reports '- alarmist"The American people tE water contaminated-by -lead, fecal. :::menti and the Tillamook Water -r- bacteria-and other-pollutants and -Commission.The report said that' us that they are willing to pay fc with toxic:chemicals,:according:to:.R among Oregon's agar water sys _safe drinking water,"said Robert separate,reports released Thursday tO - serving more than , Wubenna,a_president of the Amer M = "can Water*Works ;Associations by',;two Major environmerital�orga- � ;�O,OOdpeople_=Lebanon.Wood-�� =nonprofit=Organization based " i Drawing from 'data compiled?by .- ported violations:The most corn-''..-7 Washuigton."But they are not wil the Environmental Protection Agen- mon contaminant in Oregon was. : to pay additional costs whic cy'and local water utilities; the re-= coliform bacteria Some utilities, »provide them no additional prote ports included_estimates that the such as those in Tigard and Lake tion-" e consumption Of contaniinated water . Oswego,were affected by exces---- -The working groups report wa causes 1,200 deaths and more than 7 'sive levels of lead.Residents serv- compiled from information gathere Million cases of mild to moderate ill-• iced by the Canby Regency system by the group during 1993-94.Darin ness each year.Those figures are far received water containing chemi- that period, 53 million American drank water that violated safety.an higher than earlier estimates of ef- calls or radioactivity above the re- uride fects of waterborne diseases on the ' port's health standards,and sys- health standards established general population. •---_- tens such as the Oak Lodge Water the Safe Drinking Water Act,thhee ( r • One of the studies, prepared by District(Milwaukee)and the Powell One said. the Natural Resources Defense Valley Road Water District were af- that f most alarmingormbfindingia wa Council,said water systems serving - fected by microbial contaminants. thatfalconform ly present ti bads one out of everyfive Americans ala nare normally present in sev, age and can cause disease — wer were discovered to contain cryptos- found in 1,172 water systems natior poridium, the microbial contami- immune systems are compromised wide serving 11.6 million peoplr nant that resulted in 104 deaths:and —should probably take some steps said Cook. "That clearly demon more than 400,000 illnesses during a to protect themselves." The reports, states that the cleanup of our wate March 1993 outbreak in Milwaukee. released by the council and the En- is not nearly as effective as it coup Federal statutes do not require mu- vironmental Working Group, come be,"he said. nicipal water authorities ,to clean as Congress is debating changes that Lead was found in 2,551 system: cryptosporidium from water reser- . would allow industries and,local serving 10.3 million people,and radi voirs. Cryptosporidium can cause governments more flexibility in oactive materials such as radon an( diarrhea in healthy people and se- complying with the Clean Water uranium were found in 326 system: vere illness in those with weakened Act,which governs cleanup of lakes, serving 1.7 million people,the repor immune systems. _ rivers, and other water bodies. The said. "We are not saying that people House passed a revision of the stat- Of the cities where contaminatior should panic or that everybody is ute in May. President Clinton said with fecal coliform bacteria wal getting sick," said Erik Olson, an this week he would veto the bill if found, New York's water systen water specialist with the council and the Senate passed it. serves the largest population. Other author of one of the studies. "But Some GOP lawmakers and indus- large cities whose water violates our findings show that there are try lobbyists are pushing for a relax- standards on bacterial contamina clearly some serious health .risks ation of the Safe Drinking Water tion included Louisville, Ky.; Wash posed by tap water and that some Act, which establishes standards ineton. D.C.: Columbus. Ohio: anc UregOn WATER May 30, 1995 RESOURCES CITY OF TIGARD DEPARTMENT 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 REFERENCE: File(s) S-80342 We have received your application(s) for a water use permit along with your supporting data, documentation, and fees. A receipt is enclosed here unless you were previously issued one. Your application has been assigned the above referenced file number. Please refer to this number whenever you contact us about your application. Even though your application has been received, filed and assigned an application reference number, no authorization has been granted to develop your water use. The filing of an application does not create a water right. Water may not be used until a water right permit has been issued by the Department. After an application has been accepted for filing, public notification of the application is made, followed by the mandatory 30-day comment period. Thereafter, applications can be considered for processing as time allows. At present the Water Resources Department has a backlog of several thousand applications for water use permits which has delayed our application processing time. In general, applications are processed in the order in which they are received. However, Department staff work through Oregon's 18 river basins on a rotation basis often completing work on all applications within a single basin, then proceeding to the next basin. The processing of an application does not guarantee that a water right permit will be issued. Each application must undergo specialized analysis called a technical review and a public interest review. Until your application is reviewed, it is not possible to determine whether your particular proposed water use will be recommended for a permit. The Water Resources Commission is considering the adoption of rules to protect stream flows for fish species. This action is being contemplated in response to current and future Endangered Species Act fish listings, including many runs of salmon, steelhead and resident fish throughout the state. Commerce Building 158 12th Street NE Salem,OR 97310-0210 (503)378-3739 FAX (503) 378-8130 I RC2 e ■ METRO/NORTHWEST I O O ,W ate r stud finds outlook for region better than fear ed e dA Preliminary conclusions indicate that there should be plenty of hearings. `water for the Portland area until at least 2020 Lorna Stickel, chief planner for the Portland Water Bureau and "ll �y R.GREGORY NOKES .„ . ,,„ study manager, said the optimistic ,or The Oregonian staff - 3 outlook relies `on a big chunk of as Options for meeting Portland area sumptions," including the reliability i of Rarely do government studies pro- water needs for the next 50 years will in- she Columbiaaid, h River isn'tsMoreover, duce good news for taxpayers,but a dude phasing in additional supplies. said, the x restudlyhot andg dory :regional study says there's enough Here's one proposal likely to be included shortages in extremely and dry summers. ,water for Portland-area needs for in a preliminary recommendation due in `the next quarter-century without July: "Butwe're findinghave ,big-ticket projects. enoughh lead timeesso wwe don't have r: That doesn't mean water bills ■Immediate:Outdoor conservation to scurry about,"she added. ,won't keep going up.They have and measures,such as incentives for more One major reason for the im- `Will. In West Linn alone,residential efficient outdoor sprinklers and possibly proved outlook is the availability of rates nearly doubled this year to an requirements for more efficient sprin some backup wells along the Colum .,average monthly bill of $20.96 as klers for new construction. bia, which were shut down in 1992 that community arranges for more because of concern over contamina- ■2025:Clackamas River,an additional tion.The threat still keeps other Co- ,.water. 50 million gallons a day. lumbia wells out of the system,how- ". In Portland, which has some of :the cheapest water in the region, •2036:Acquifer storage for use in peak ever. demand periods. While the region is in overall good residential rates increased 3.4 per- P shape, some communities will face cent to an average of$11.55.They're •2045:Willamette River,50 million gal- shortages within the next five years .expected to jump another 6 percent Ions a day. or so without additional supplies. ,next year. WATER STATISTICS These include Tigard, Wilsonville But preliminary conclusions from and Damascus. ca four-year study indicate the region Current potential supply About 493 million gallons for an average peak con Regional water planners are dis- million have enough water until at g 9 P 'least 2020. That means taxpayers sumption day. cussing joint action to meet such needs. ron't face paying for quarter-billion •Current demand About 365 million "We ought to be able to sell those --1 'dollar water projects — such as a gallons for an average peak day. people water so they don't have to third Bull Run dam or a Willamette River supply — before then and U 2020 demand About 455 million gal go to a source before we're ready to probably well beyond. Ions. go as a group," said Gene Seibel, general manager of the Tualatin • That outlook depends on comple- ■2045 demand:About 650 million gal- Valley Water District. "Some of us • tion of current projects on the Trask Ions. have some excess water now. ... In and Clackamas rivers, along with Officials caution that demand can soar the short-term we ought to be able to conservation measures and some much higher in extreme weather condi- keep the Tigards and the Damas- new pipelines to improve water dis- tions. cuses in water." tribution in Multnomah, Clackamas In addition to a third Bull Run and Washington counties. dam and water from the Willamette, "It's far more optimistic than water bill, according to a prelimi other long-term options include the what we've heard in the past," said nary estimate. Columbia River, additional supplies Judie Hammerstad, chairwoman of from the Clackamas and under- the Clackamas County Board of The study by Portland and 27 ground storage. Commissioners, following a briefing other local governments and water The question of who pays for , for local officials. "I think we all districts addresses the region's what, and when. remains,unan- came away feeling the water supply, water needs for the next 50 years. It swered. The planning group is only 1 if we can put in transmission lines, was undertaken after a 1992 drought beginning discussions on how to is in pretty good shape." caused serious shortages and raised manage a regional system, including Major supply options, such as the concerns about the long-term sup- a possible role for Metro. Willamette, are still under consider- PLY- R. Gregory Nokes covers govern- ation. Regional governments will Preliminary recommendations for ment and politics in the Portland have to choose from among them future water supply options are due metropolitan area. He can be reached • eventually. They would add from$6 in July. A final recommendation is at 221-8409 or by mail at 1320 S.W. to $8 to the monthly residential set for December, following public Broadway, Portland 97201. t REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN—PHASE 2 PARTICIPANTS COM1'u i I LE MEETING Minutes of March 28, 1995 Alan Fletcher, Clairmont Water District, vice chair, called the meeting to order at Tigard Water District, at 1:45 p.m. Attending: Approval of Minutes: Greg DiLoreto City of Gresham The Committee approved the February 21, 1995 Mike McKillip City of Tualatin minutes. Duane Robinson Rockwood PUD Tom Hoffman Oak Lodge WD Amendment to Project Scope: John Thomas Mt Scott WD Alan Fletcher asked for a vote on a project scope Denny Klingbile Damascus WD amendment. The amendment is for$12,000 for the Larry Sparling South Fork WB Portland Water Bureau to pay Montgomery Watson Carter Harrison Clackamas WD consultants for additional work with the reservoir Jesse Lowman Tualatin availability and IRP models. This work evaluates the Valley WD impact of flows out of the Bull Run reservoirs with the Vergie Ries City of Beaverton additional reservoir at maximum utilization and with 70 Joel Komarek City of Lake CFS to be devoted to instream flows in the lower Bull Oswego Run and Sandy rivers from June through October. The Duane Cline City of Lake amendment passed unanimously. Oswego Tim Erwert City of Hillsboro Progress Reports: Joint WC Tim Erwert reported the Steering Committee had been Roger Meyer West Slope WD reviewing the model, identifying its shortcomings, Jerry Anderson City of Wood tweaking it, etc. They completed the initial review of the Village report on small groundwater sources. They will be Jeff Bauman City of Wilsonville looking at long-term plan implementation strategies with Ed Wegner City of Tigard Ed Tenny of Montgomery Watson. They are looking at Scott Burgess City of West Linn the role of the Regional Conservation Coalition in South Fork WB reviewing the next conservation report. The committee is Lorna Stickel Portland WB also revisiting the IRP model assumptions.They Robert Jortner Portland WB reviewed the public involvement program and feel it is Alan Fletcher Clairmont WD adequate to get the planning through critical decision- Michael Baker Rockwood PUD making. Eleanor Clark CRRILO, League of Women Voters Metro Regional Water Supply Proposal Process: Greg Nokes The Oregonian Lorna Stickel reviewed the progress report for the Jack Polans self-writer Participants Committee(see Attachment A). Lorna Don Roberts discussed the framework of the water supply plan and Peggy Murphy Portland WB how elements of it might be used by the METRO Council as part of their 2040 Region project. Rosemary Furfey, METRO staff reported that METRO expects to participate in the planning process for the next 9 months so their Council will be committed and educated about the final plan. METRO expects to use the portions of the Regional Water Supply Plan relating to growth management and land use as they develop the water • , • Participants Committee Meeting March 28, 1995 Page 2 resource element of the Regional Framework Plan. The METRO Council is required to hold public hearings for this process. Rosemary anticipates the council will accept the plan. She said open space and housing density were important as they might affect the ability of water providers to site facilities. (See Attachment B.) Lorna referred to the METRO Council's proposed revisions to the Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives(RUGGOs). Goal No 9, regarding Watershed Management and Regional Water Quality has been revised since the Committee last reviewed it. Goal No. 10, Water Supply, is a new goal with corresponding objectives. Lorna said to contact Lorna or Rosemary Furfey if there are questions. Rosemary offered to give a presentation on the RUGGOs to the Participants Committee. Lorna is on the MTAC and is responsible for taking concerns and providing input to METRO. Amendments to the RUGGOs will be decided in July. Public Involvement Strategy Update: Lorna reviewed the public involvement strategy update prepared by Brad Higbee (see Attachment C). It incorporates comments from the participants Public Involvement Subcommittee. The Portland Water Bureau is preparing a project information sheet, designed for the lay person. The Oak Lodge Water District is revising Portland's "Million Thanks" brochure to a generic version so it can be used as an information piece by any of the participants. Tom Hoffman expressed concern over developing a master mailing list based on the returned coupons from the "million thanks" brochure. Lorna suggested that participants keep track of who they send the information sheet to and who is interested in receiving more information. Lorna said invitations will be sent to interested stakeholders and an announcement placed in the paper for a Public Forum in May. She said the focus groups will help people weigh and balance values.In response to a question from Rosemary Furfey,Lorna clarified that there will be an additional forum after the preliminary plan is released in July. There have been suggestions about public interest in trying to get on television shows such as NW Reports, Oregon Field Guide, and Town Hall. Some of the providers may approach cable TV in their area. Lorna said Portland Commissioner Mike Lindberg is interested in developing a short, professionally produced video, similar to video projects for West Side Light Rail and others. She said it is expensive, $2,000/minute, and the discussions continue. Commissioner Lindberg may make a proposal to the Steering Committee regarding a way to reduce the cost of the video. Alan Fletcher noted this is not in the budget and it would have to be approved by the Participants. Lorna said the Washington County Forum scheduled for May will be videotaped. Project staff and Participants are working on getting space at the three county fairs..The speakers bureau hasn't been officially set up, although Lorna and Roberta have been asked to provide many presentations. They have received good feedback on the project slide show. Lorna offered project staff assistance to providers interested in giving presentations. John Thomas asked when the staff would set a date for the participating agencies/elected officials workshop. Lorna said the consultants are still refining the IRP model assumptions. Greg DiLoreto suggested scheduling the workshop for the next participants committee meeting;Lorna noted she would be out of town that day and recommended a date be set for late April or early May. Participants Committee Meeting March 28, 1995 Page 3 Public Comments: None. Other Business: ■ Groundwater Inventory Lorna referred the group to the memo, Small Source Groundwater Inventory(see Attachment D). Water Bureau staff assisted Murray Smith& Associates by producing this inventory as part of the transmission analysis and for the IRP modeling. She asked that the Participants review the report and those with comments or those with additional wells let her know. She said they represent a fair amount of water. Tom Erwert said the Steering Committee is concerned that the status of the wells be accurate regarding current and future use. Lorna said they are following up on information on surface water sources. • Conservation Report Duane Robinson thanked the Regional Conservation Coalition for their letter on the latest conservation report. He said they worked very hard on it and the conservation work will be a highlight of the study. ■ Water Quality Rankings Duane also expressed concern about the City of Portland's Water Quality Advisory Committee's concern over using a national perspective to rank sources. Duane said the committee's bias is toward water quality, which leaves out perspectives on quantity and transmission. Duane said this committee is charged with having a narrow perspective and he feels their framework is not broad enough for a 50-year study. • Aquifer Storage and Recovery Jesse Lowman discussed a meeting with legislative leaders on a bill to authorize ASR. He said there was good response and input. DEQ didn't testify, OEC and Water Watch were both supportive. Comments included questions about water rights. Jesse felt that DEQ does not see nitrates as a serious concern. A work group will meet March 29 to discuss and refine the bill. • National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permits Jesse also expressed concern about waste water and NPDES permits. He asked if there should be a work group to discuss this. He said DEQ is becoming aggressive in applying the rules and regulations to water supply facilities. Vergie Ries said Beaverton has to get permits to flush water lines and drain reservoirs. Greg DiLoreto said that Gresham needs permits to do hydrant flushing. Vergie said she was in a meeting where Oregon Health Division and DEQ were disagreeing on the interpretation of the law. Greg suggested OWUC might be the place to deal with these regulations resulting from the Clean Water Act. Tim Erwert noted this topic is not in the scope of the intergovernmental agreement for the planning project. He felt individual governments could get together to address this issue. Tim asked Jesse to report on this item at the next Participants Committee meeting. Meeting adjourned at 2:50 p.m. Submitted by Peggy L. Murphy G:\PLAN\PC3-28.WPD /11111-akv"-vvf/4 3/2 s/yr l'*.kz,J*&.k.2:,,-,,' - -„,, - "':7:,s::',.':7 1.:i—:.--.' '. ) ,1,,,,,,. „ sf.ApAktv,,iitiL,„ :-.--„ -. -. -- . —.. :,--, ,, - n a ;4 A ,. sY&�ro "...... z;za.v _is V.‘Ci1 !@ p 'i4:?. -,t-...'. a_ ',; .. . ;,.i .,-,`a ...,,,, ..: March 28, 1995 Since the last meeting of the Participants Committee on February 21, 1995 the Project Management Staff have been involved in the following activities: 1) Staff have met with consultants about the public involvement program and the institutional element to discuss the process from now till the issuance of the Preliminary Plan in July. A meeting of the public involvement subcommittee will be set up prior to the next steering committee. 2)Staff have met with BCI staff to discuss the conservation program report and the review process for the Conservation Coalition and the Steering Committee to review that document. 3)Staff attended a meeting at WRD in Salem on the budget issues regarding the state funded share of a Corps reauthorization study for the Willamette projects on February 23. WRD staff will present an alternative for the participants to review for presentation to the legislative subcommittee responsible for reviewing the WRD budget. The ideas discussed ways to reduce this biennium share including such things moving to a four year time span, when the actual start date would be,and if other local match shares could be generated. A fair amount of time was spent discussing the potential opposition of the agricultural community to having a reauthorization feasibility study conducted at all. 4)Staff reviewed the Columbia River National Estuary Program nomination agreement. Contact DEQ staff to suggest that the discussion of beneficial uses note that the Columbia is under study as a potential municipal supply source for the Portland metropolitan region. 5) Staff made a presentation to the Water Services Leadership Group meeting on March 6 about the outcomes for the Phase 2 process and the public involvement process. 6)Staff attended the Metro WRPAC subcommittee on Water Resources and Open Spaces meeting on March 8. The Metro work program for refining the Metro 2040 growth management decision was outlined and this group provided input on the refinement of the unbuildable lands inventory and discussed the type of recommendations that might be made about adequate standards for providing adequate water management inside the UGB. 7)Staff met with three members of the Denver Water Depaitment to discuss with them the IRP process and desired outcomes of the RWSP for our region and how this compared with the situation in Denver. 8)Staff attended the Metro MTAC meeting on March 9 and received information on the refinement of the population forecasts that Metro is conducting at this time. The major point is that the area has grown faster than prior predictions since 1990 and this has resulted in less Iand supply left inside the current UGB than was anticipated. The more detailed Metro 2015 population forecasts are being developed now and will likely reflect these faster growth rates. 9)Staff has coordinated the printing and distribution of the conservation program to the Col/Willamette Conservation Coalition. 10)Staff have met with the consultants to discuss revisions to the environmental rankings based on the review of these materials as drafted: 11)Staff participated in the public involvement subcommittee meeting which occurred on March 10. 12)Staff have been working to assist in any refinements to the current water system assumptions as they will be reflected in the IRP model,particularly those related to the Portland wellfield and some of the smaller systems as they play into the transmission analysis. 13) Staff made presentations to the Geological Society of the Oregon Country and the Portland Garden Club about the RWSP utilizing the slide show, handout materials, and discussion. 14) Staff met with Metro staff to discuss the adoption process for the RWSP and the Metro role in that adoption process as well as aspects of the Metro water supply element of the Metro Regional Framework Plan. A report will be made as a part of the PC agenda for March 28. 15) Staff attended a Metro MTAC meeting on March 23 and listened to discussions about the redevelopment land survey and some bills being considered by the Legislature on standards for the urban growth boundary and on expedited hearings processes for subdivisions in urban growth boundaries. 16) Staff reviewed and provided comments to Montgomery Watson about the results of the analysis of flow impacts from a third Bull Run dam in the Bull Run and Sandy Rivers. The results of this analysis will enable a representative mitigation strategy to be incorporated into the IRP process to reflect the costs involved with flow mitigation. 17) Staff attended the Col/Will Conservation Coalition meeting on March 21 along with consultant staff at which the conservation programs packages were discussed and reviewed. Staff is coordinating the response from the Coalition for the Steering Committee. 18) Staff have met with Montgomery Watson to discuss the refinements to the evaluation criteria, rankings, and justification language for the water quality and the environmental elements. TIGARD WATER DISTRICT INCOME STATEMENT & BALANCE SHEET As of May 22, 1995 INCOME STATEMENT Accounts I J Prior Y- T -D I J Monthly I J Y- T- D I REVENUES 1% PY Water Sales Revenue 7,347.76 7,347.76 Interest Earned 979.32 81.31 1,060.63 Recovered Expenditures 322.96 322.96 Total Revenues 8,650.04 81.31 8,731.35 EXPENDITURES Professional Services 551.45 551.45 Contractual Services 4,776.10 4,776.10 Special Department Expense 759.35 759.35 Office Supplies & Expenses Advertising& Elections Dues & Subscriptions 3,326.00 3,326.00 Insurance 2,928.10 2,928.10 Total Expenditures 11,581.65 759.35 12,341.00 BALANCE SHEET ASSETS Cash& Investments 27,737.95 (678.04) 27,059.91 Net Fixed Assets Total Assets 27,737.95 (678.04) 27,059.91 LIABILITIES & FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts Payable Due Other Funds Total Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance 30,669.56 30,669.56 Excess of Revenues/(Expenditures) (2,931.61) (678.04) (3,609.65) Total Fund Balance 27,737.95 (678.04) 27,059.91 g:\Excel\TWD\Monthly\94-5isbs.xls TIGARD WATER DISTRICT EXPENDITURE LISTING JULY 1, 1994 THROUGH MAY 22, 1995 July 1, 1994 Bolliger & Sons Inc. Faithful Performance Bond 07/01/94 - 07/01/95 $ 487.05 July 22, 1994 Special Districts Associaton of Oregon Annual Dues 100.00 August 4, 1994 Portland-Metro Area Local Boundry Review Commission Annual Dues 3,226.00 October 27, 1994 Secretary of State Audit Reveiw Fee 10.00 November 9, 1994 Davis Wright Tremaine Attorney Fees 29.25 February 2, 1995 Davis Wright Tremaine Attorney Fees 284.20 February 16, 1995 Special Districts Association of OR Insurance 1,954.00 April 13, 1995 Davis Wright Tremaine Attorney Fees 228.00 April 27, 1995 Bolliger & Sons, Inc- Insurance Faithful Performance Bond 07/01/95 - 07/01/96 487.05 April 30, 1995 City Labor Hours 07/01/94 through 02/28/95 4,776.10 May 11, 1995 Washington County Dept. of Finance March'95 Election Costs 759.35 $ 12.341.00