Loading...
04/26/1999 - Packet FILE COPY .*:::? ii>ii i<i:«ii:i:::,*.; i:: < `< i s :i r?' ' .. i.......:.::.:.... .. '1s':ii.SO 's':i,'is ii iii..''i>:i''n<:;;ii' :iti i :i::'i: :' ii: i:;fin :: ... i;C %.: i%' yiii4 ... .............. ...........................................TAG ,ND, ....A.....................!i!...!!!!...,..1..1.1.!..1...1:!i•:,.....,1,,,..1,.,,,!....,....:::,,,,,!.„.„..,,,.:...,:a :,:,:,:•::„:„:,:•::„.•:::......::::.:....,............. • Mom:,:: :::.,.;;<.;; . ..�`', ` `....,,,,,:,.:::::,,,,............:„......„.....••••••.. i..... < < ii:':'i'l :,i,i..{x.:::;.;:.>:�;> s :`ii:?'::�;: %>3 i> 2ii: sss > <i '•:'+.::" • >`<``z'<:y2!33`3 �i;'�'<£ ! iii 'i2 as i2 sss <"f ':`f>'% '33? > { `+%'% YG...� %% i? `' as Z $ .... ilvf`:`�'`:'i< < iii ;??o is :i::': : ..�. �:: �:::\!;�:/j�"::: ::�:::so:�5::::� :::�:::� :�li.?:j�::�' : ,.. . ?fit .:. �.u►?4+A:::4V1aMe�:.S4 . ': � '.:::: ?:::: >::�::::::::: :>::isy::':::: :::::::::::::;;; ::::::::::::::::::;:;:::::::::::::::: % • • $ted ...:.��n�x�,�?�cxr]�I. .'��ma�.:::::::::::.:::::..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::: :: i'"'` ji i'>isi2•.............„.........:„............si i5; ` : i i i:i:i?iii::.''..... i<i?as.<: ':'ti' ::.`;a�`':>�i::i:'isi::asisisi:asisisisisi:isisisi:isisi i:::2�i' .......... :..::...9:.:,•.%:]:i:.1!illk:::.''!iii:..:A....4...:lt.lj4MP.'rs.'.:%:'...::':„:..:.!:::..::..:::::!::.!!!11.'It:']illi:ll'IIIII;101ilb1;111;11::'i:::::.1:LK::i.:.:i'::::::..:'ji''::j:.'ij:;i..ilite.t.H1:11i?X::''' I:ie:H:':':::''''::'!':1:136:::.7::att):i...;; :: Executive . ... .. .::;... . . : .::::pi:::s .. . :.: �s�on.Ute.the.. . ...7.8�.43 .;:��:: �::::�� � :i :1:;:::.d::>:: ::<::$L:::::.:.:: :::::::. . : . ' ::«:: .... ,.,...,, r; c fi..;:. ......:-.:„.-....*:....,,,...,:::::::::::,:::::it #::...:•::::: :. ;: xa i actt4 ..:: ,t et>> d'<:.'.'nd :<: r xs w �:::> : i;i:M.iii:::.::.:::: .::. :::.;:.::::::::::::.:::::::: ::::::::::::: .:.:::::..::.::::..: ::::.: ::' ::.}}:.}:i:;:::': :::::.:�.�:::.:: ::::: .. ::.:....M ..�....i: ..�..:_;........F...:...i:.......i.::...... .........h..::Y::: :.:....... ... ..h..:..:.: ....:.....i. ..�:.::::::.i•.::�1::: :.:::i <A11d ssions;:w ' se ::: '. :€ den# ".; h € f : i n:: > n " maybe disclosed:::y ;:::»i:R . :. to' " :: .: .'::: .: :.. . .::::: ': ait`ltend:::this ss on>::: ata ustnot:disclo :; :::::.. nnatl: ::: #,�qy; *p �ye�y :............� �W 'is� :4:4:4ii:::.:i:i;:� ::�ii:�iiii iii:iii::i::i::�i:�:is ; ii:4:^:�ii:^:�::�i:�:is�::�:::�i::::vs.:::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: ........tine.:: ::::::.::::::::::::.::::::::.::::...:.:::.: :................................................. .:.....:...::::::::::::::.:: ::::::::::::::::::. TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETING MARCH 29, 1999 Members Present: David Strauss, Gretchen Buehner, John Haunsperger, Beverly Froude, Norm Penner Staff Members Present: Mike Miller and Ed Wegner Visitors Present: 40 1. Call to order: Commissioner Norm Penner called the Meeting of the Tigard Water Board of Commissioners to order at 7:02 p.m. on March 29, 1999. 2. Roll Call/Introductions All members present. 3. Approval of minutes Commissioner Buehner moved to accept the January 25, 1999 and February 22, 1999, regular minute meetings as written. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All members present voting AYE, the motion passed unanimously. 4. Public Hearing Commissioner Penner went into lengthy discussion regarding the Willamette River Long-Term issues. • Two sources of water: Surface Water and Ground Water. • State controls both sources and is regulated through the Water Resources Commission. • Oregon waters laws are based upon the principal of prior appropriation. • Tigard, Durham, King City have no water rights. • Brief history of water usage from Lake Oswego. • Tigard has had contract with Portland Water System and Tualatin Valley Water District for several years, purchasing surplus water. • After extensive study only 2 options left for Tigard Water System. Continue to purchase Portland surplus water. Build its own water treatment plant on the Willamette River. Tigard Water District Board— July 23, 1999 Page 1 • Water Task Force are meeting weekly to view these options. • Tigard needs the most dependable long-term water supply at the most economical price and the best quality. Meeting was then opened to questions from the audience. Q: Is there a chance to buy in to the Bull Run? A: Ed Wegner—You may not buy into the Bull Run. The contract now states you can buy into the infrastructure,the water you purchase through the City of Portland. There is talk if they were to raise any of the existing dams or build a third dam or a filtration plant, if you were under contract with them you could buy in a portion of those new facilities. If we went with the Willamette we would actually buy into a partnership, which we would own water as well as infrastructure to deliver water to the Tigard area. Q: Would the contracts have limits on the amount of water that would be made available by the Bull Run System, so that a possible restriction of the Bull Run option is a reality that at any given point in time the water available to the Tigard Water System would not be available to serve the needs of the District? A: Ed Wegner—Yes. We now have connections to only purchase 8 million gallons of water a day from the Portland Water System, which is Bull Run and Columbia South Shore Well Field. It is in their proposal that at certain times during the year, as recently as December of this last year, when we do purchase Portland water we get well water from the Columbia South Shore Well Field. It is blended water of both and will be throughout the new contract. The City of Portland serves approximately 12 other cities. The contract with Portland would not be just for the City of Tigard; it would include all the other cities. Q: Dale Johnson, Bull Mountain Resident—Would someone speak to the feasibility and costs relating to both contracts? A: Commissioner Haunsperger—There is a company under contract to research, test the raw water in the Willamette River, to design a filtration plant and the delivery system needed to meet the needs of Tigard and other communities. Portland was also asked to submit a proposal. Financial Officers from Tigard, Sherwood, Wilsonville, Tualatin, and Tualatin Valley Water District have received both proposals, which have been reviewed in the same way. The handout is an overview of the costs. 4 Commissioner Buehner explained the cost comparison of both proposals. Willamette River— City of Tigard's share - $42.7 million dollars City of Portland - City of Tigard's share - $66.5 million dollars Tigard Water District Board—July 23, 1999 Page 2 Commission Buehner also gave an explanation of what the cost would be over the lifetime, approximately 50 years, of both Willamette River and City of Portland proposals. Q: Does the cost comparison include Wilsonville, Tualatin, and Sherwood? A: Ed Wegner—The cost comparison is just for Tigard's share of the total bill. Wilsonville and Sherwood have their own cost comparison. Q: Could you explain the purpose of tonight's meeting and the relationship to your agenda for the next 60 days. Is this meeting just public input? What decisions have already been made? Is it going to be a vote of the people? A: Commissioner Penner—The talk of"the vote" is just the City of Tigard speaking. Our board represents the residents of the unincorporated area. We need to make a decision whether to go to the Willamette or City of Portland, and give our decision to the Intergovernmental Water Board to make the final decision. This meeting is held for input from the citizen's of the unincorporated area to help in our decision making. Q: What are the 2 options? A: Commissioner Penner— Our 2 option are as follow: Continue to buy surplus water from City of Portland. Join the other communities and build a Water Treatment Filtration Plant to take water from the Willamette River. Q: How do you feel about the quality of water that comes out of the Willamette? A: Commissioner Penner- The Willamette River is not a bad water source and the treatment plant would produce water as pure or purer than water today. Also, a series of tests have been done on the middle and upper Willamette River. Today the water is drinkable—not that polluted. All pollutants are removable through the treatment plant. Q: Steve D'Angelo - Tigard Business Owner and lives in the unincorporated area- Has the pollution growth figures been considered into our cost comparison figures for the years to come and are we only looking at the cost vs. quality? A: Commissioner Haunsperger- We are looking at cost, quality and availability of water. Q: Steve D'Angelo - Are we getting any help from Metro in our decision making? Have there been any studies made? Tigard Water District Board—July 23, 1999 Page 3 Al Ed Wegner -In the early 1990's Metro was involved with setting up a Regional Supply Agency which did studies of water resources. Although at this time, Metro has not been involved with our decision making. Q: Don Williams, Bull Mountain Resident - The weather reports state that we are in a 20 year increase wet cycle. With the combine sewer, what about the overflow to the Willamette? A: Ed Wegner-The major combine sewer overflow is in the City of Portland, at Portland Harbor and Riverfront Park area. This would not have an impact here. Q: Why are we doing this now? Are we running out of water now? A: Commissioner Penner- We are reaching the end of our contract and a decision has to be made. Q: Are fish deformities a serious concern and what are the causes of these fish deformities? A: Commissioner Penner- There are several reasons for fish deformities. There are studies in the literature handout explaining the different causes of fish deformities all over the world. In the Willamette River only Squawfish, which are bottom-feeders, have shown any deformities. The State has not funded a BioAssay test to find out the causes for these deformities. If the appropriate scientific test can be done we should be able to identify the unknown chemicals that are causing the deformities. No other species in the river have shown deformities. Commissioner Buchner—20% of the water we would be drinking if we go with Portland would be from the Columbia South Shore Well Fields and their has been a real problem with contamination of those well. According to DEQ within the next 20 years they will come up with a system to keep the contamination from seeping into the wells. The other issue is up on Mount Hood. There has been a problem with deformed salamanders. Both water systems will need a lot of planning and testing. There are issues for each water source. Q: Would you discuss the issue of the water supply? A: Ed Wegner—One main concern is that we do have enough water for the Tigard Water Service Area. Our only supply now is surplus water. Our projections are if we do not develop other sources of water and start conserving, we will not have enough water for the region much less the Tigard Service Area. If Portland had an emergency they could cut off our water supply, as we are one of the last agencies to enter their contract. Tigard's Wells can only supply 1.3 million gallons of water a day. Our community is using over 6 million gallons a day. It is critical to find our own water supply. Tigard Water District Board—July 23, 1999 Page 4 Q: Why can't we have testing done to find out the causes of the deformities and what is the cost for the BioAssay testing? A: Commissioner Penner—We do not have the cost at this time. If we go with the Willamette there will be continual testing for causes of deformities. At some point there should be an identified cause for the deformities. Q: Why does a decision have to be made today? Why can't we stay with Portland and in 15 years see how the City of Wilsonville is doing and then buy in at that time. A: Ed Wegner—We now have 10 million gallons capacity per day. Our needs in the summer are 13 million gallons a day. It will take many years to develop a new water system. We need to make a decision so we can move on to the next phase of development. Our contract expires in the year 2007. It will be at least five to seven years before the treatment plant would be usable. We will always keep two contracts on board for the service area so that we have certainty of water. We would continue to keep Portland as our second contract. Q: Who would handle the development and conservation issues? Is the state involved with these issues? A: Ed Wegner—Introduction of Kevin Hanway and his position regarding the Willamette Proposal. Kevin is involved with state agencies regarding these issues. We have asked DEQ for more testing on the deformities of fish. We are doing raw water monitoring. We know more about the raw water in the Willamette than Portland knows about the raw water in Bull Run. We have been asked to compare our raw water monitoring reports to others. We can not find anyone that uses a major river or in the Portland Metropolitan area that has the extensive raw water monitoring that Tualatin Valley Water District and the City of Tigard have done for the last three years on this project. We have increased our Conservation program since 1992. This year we have a full time staff member that will start working with schools, the general public, and landscaping ordinances. Since 1992, we have had a growth of about 22 percent. Yet we have reduced water consumption of about 17 percent. Jack Craforth, Co-chairman of the Association for Safe Water—We have been testing the Willamette River for years. The studies are being made by Montgomery—Watson, which are a very fine engineering firm have been supported by the EPA, DEQ, by every agency in this Government as being sufficient and they say that the Willamette River will produce 99.9 percent pure drinking water. The Portland Water System has 26 percent Columbia Well Water and its Bull Run water, so it is polluted. The studies and facts are that the Willamette River will produce better drinking water than the Portland Water System. Tigard Water District Board—July 23, 1999 Page 5 Q: What about new development in the area and surrounding areas, how are they effected? A: Ed Wegner- We only service what is called the Tigard Water Service Area Boundary. The new developments within this area will pay a"Systems Development Charge" for being a part of our system. Q: Has anyone done a study on what it would do to property values for people who live in Tigard and unincorporated Tigard? A: Ed Wegner- Yes, we went to Portland Metropolitan Board of Realtors Million Dollar Club in September of this year. We had brought both scenarios before them and there was no mention regarding the price of properties going down. Q: Is there three thousand homes now using the Willamette? A: Commissioner Penner- There is an unknown number of people who live along the Willamette River who get there drinking water from wells. Once the water is pump from wells, it is replaced with water from the Willamette River. Aquifers around the Willamette are all open Aquifers. Which means that water percolates down from the river into the Aquifers and feeds them. Q: Wilsonville is going to be the place for the prison. Is the State going to contribute to the water system? A: Ed Wegner- At that time, when Wilsonville was in consideration, the City of Wilsonville could not supply the water. State funds were put aside to help fund a long- term water supply to guarantee either Portland or the Willamette proposals. This money is not figured into the cost comparison of Portland's proposal. Q: The listing of fish runs may reduce the amount of water storage in Bull Run. Will that have an impact on the availability of water? A: Commissioner Penner- Yes, streams can run dry and it would have a significant impact on our water supply. Q: Have studies been made on the Columbia River? A: Kevin Hanway - There is a restriction on obtaining water from the Columbia River. It goes back 80 years to the"Issue of Rights". So there has not been a study on the Columbia River. Q: What other options are the City of Willsonville and the City of Sherwood researching? Tigard Water District Board—July 23, 1999 Page 6 A: Commissioner Penner- The same two options as the City of Tigard. Q: Judith Anderson, King City Resident - Can we be insured that there will be no additional industrial development added to the Willamette River and is there a possibility that the filtration plant may not have the capacity to remove certain sources of pollution? A: Commissioner Haunsperger-We do have an active committee looking at this issue. Commissioner Penner- We have discussed this issue with the Environmental Science Department at Portland State University. Their suggestion would be to put more pressure on DEQ to put more testing upstream. Also to keep us informed as to what is going on around the river. They also suggested that all of us, Tigard, Wilsonville, and Sherwood residents put pressure on DEQ and the State for clean up of the Willamette River. Q: Are we the first to use the Willamette? A: Commissioner Penner- No, Corvallis has used the Willamette River for 30 years. Q: What is the next stop in this process for this board? A: Commissioner Buehner- On April 7, 1999, we will vote on the two options. The vote will go to the Intergovernmental Water Board and then to the Tigard City Council. There will be one more public hearing on April 13, 1999 before the City Council. The process will end on April 27, 1999, if everyone keeps their time line, that will be the vote by the City Council. Commissioner Buehner- At first I was Pro Bull Run bias. When Murray, Smith and Associates came in, there was concern and I was skeptical. I had asked several questions and come to a conclusion that the Willamette River can be a safe water supply. I had tried to deal with the City of Portland on certain issues and could not get a straight answer, this became very frustrating. Q: Can we pump from the Clackamas? A: Ed Wegner- We have no water rights. The city of West Linn will not let the city of Lake Oswego expand their treatment plant. As we grew and Lake Oswego grew, they could not supply us water in the peak summer times. Q: Steve D'Angelo - Requested a vote. The majority are on the fence due to the discussion of this meeting. Commissioner Buehner- Requested volunteers for the Budget Committee. Steve D'Angelo volunteered for the Budget Committee. Tigard Water District Board—July 23, 1999 Page 7 Commissioner Haunsperger- There is an on going committee of 37 people who have a meeting on every Thursday at City Hall. The meeting is open to the public. Q: Once the treatment plant is up and going would we sell any or our surplus water to other agencies? A: Ed Wegner—No, not at this time. We may in the future have an Emergency Contract Water Supply set up for other agencies. An informal vote of those in attendance indicated that the majority of citizens favor the Willamette option. 5. Intergovernmental Water Board Update The next meeting will be held on April 7, 1999. 6. Utility Manager's Report Mike Miller, Utility Manager, handed out a packet of information and discussed the following: • Elections Results—Position#4 vacant. Had several 2 vote write ins. • Wilsonville Paper— Two newspapers • -Cityscape—Water report • Quarterly Sample Report—With narrative test result. • Budget Meeting— Suggested to hold Budget Meeting in April as Wayne Lowry is leaving the end of April. Commissioner Haunsperger requested Commissioner Buehner to head up the Budget Committee. Commissioner Buehner accepted. Steve D'Angelo has signed up to be on the Budget Committee. Commissioner Strauss moved to discuss the water supply option. Commissioner Buehner seconded the motion. 7. Non-Agenda Items The report on legal fees were not available at this time. Commissioner Strauss requested that all Districts and Boards be informed of meeting times and of any changes. Discussion was held on the process of voting on the 2 options. Commissioner Froude requested clarification on the voting process. She requested that an attorney look at how the voting will take place. Tigard Water District Board—July 23, 1999 Page 8 Commissioner Penner moved for a vote to approve the Willamette River as a water source. Commissioner Buehner seconded the motion. All members present voting AYE, the motion passed unanimously. 8. Visitors Comments None. 9. Set next meeting date The next meeting is scheduled for April 26, 1999. 10. Adjournment Commissioner Haunsperger adjourned the regular meeting to Executive Session at 9:45 p.m. Executive Session The Tigard Water District Board went into Executive Session at 9:45 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660(1)(d), (e), & (h)to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. Executive Session adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Tigard Water District Board— July 23, 1999 Page 9 Lead Summit, April 6, 1999 • Edwards - Rosenberger lr lai& Seierstad Casson The Water Bureau sponsored a second Lead Summit on community exposure to lead. Stacey Edwards,outreach and public education coordinator for the Bureau's Lead Hazard Reduction Program,co-facilitated. Mike Rosenberger provided an overview of the Bureau's projects to reduce community exposure to lead and related public involvement.Along with community and health professionals, Curt Ireland, Bert Seierstad(Lead Hazard Reduction Program Manager),and Kathy Casson attended,representing the Water Resources Management group. The Cities of Gresham,Hillsboro,and Tigard and the Residential Irrigation Tualatin Valley Water District will survey an additional This spring the Water Bureau is expanding its successful 200 residential landscapes.Participating water utilities pilot program of the last two years to provide free are evaluating the program's ability to manage peak landscape surveys to residential customers to reduce season use,an important regional conservation goal. outdoor watering.Over 500 participants throughout the etropolitan area's pilot program have rated the Water: A Cash Crop? program highly—and used an average of 19%less Along the southern coastline of India,farmers who once water than neighbors who did not participate.Since grew rice in their fields are now making more money water use often doubles in the summer due to garden selling water from their groundwater supplies and and turf irrigation,these outdoor water savings reduce underground reservoirs to Kanyakumari,a coastal city peak consumption and lower water bills. which is one of India's most popular tourist destinations. Homes which used more than 60 units(45,000 gallons) Pipelines from farms lead directly to crammed hotels. of water for both of the last two summer quarters are Regional planners in southern India suggest that the the target audience. Letters have gone out this month water sales are a poor solution to a water crisis.The inviting homeowners to participate in a free landscape water table is dropping.Little has been done to capture survey.This year's program will serve 550 Portland rainwater falling in the region and store it in reservoirs. households on a first-come,first-served basis. After Despite millions of dollars spent to build 24 desalination the 1 V2 hour survey,homeowners receive an analysis of plants,only one is currently functional.The rest are out the survey information which includes optimal watering schedules for the homeowner's lawns and gardens.In of order because government employees failed to maintain them—according to a water conservation some cases,where the surveyor recommends it,a spokesperson in the region.New federal programs are licensed landscape contractor will install a rain sensor or working to install filtration systems and build new ' irrigation time clock. reservoirs to tap rainwater.In some communities The surveyors are participants in horticulture programs citizens are taking up shovels to create new tanks and at Mt.Hood and Portland Community Colleges or reservoirs and clear old canals themselves.Southern -egon State University's Master Gardener Extension India is dotted with catchment tanks and reservoirs that rogram.They will provide a strong knowledge of plant Indian rulers built in the 7`''and 8th centuries.Some selection and customer-oriented focus to the program. planners hope those systems might be used again. Source: U.S. Water News Online,April, 1999 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT ,ft., INCOME STATEMENT & BALANCE SHEET As of March 31, 1999 INCOME STATEMENT Accounts I I FY BUDGET 1 I Prior Y-T- D I 1 Monthly I I Y - T- D I REVENUES 1`)/0 PY Water Sales Revenue 9,300.00 8,889.09 8,889.09 Interest Earned 1,500.00 1,523.57 198.38 1,721.95 Recovered Expenditures 0.00 0.00 Total Revenues 10,800.00 10,412.66 198.38 10,611.04 EXPENDITURES Professional Services 3,580.00 162.00 162.00 Contractual Services 5,000.00 210.00 80.50 290.50 Special Department Expenses 1,300.00 0.00 0.00 Office Supplies & Expenses 0.00 0.00 0.00 Advertising & Elections 4,300.00 0.00 882.00 882.00 Dues & Subscriptions 1,010.00 476.00 476.00 Travel Food & Lodging , 650.00 0.00 0.00 'Education & Training 400.00 0.00 0.00 Insurance 2,000.00 1,582.00 1,582.00 Contingency/Reserve 2,700.00 0.00 0.00 Total Expenditures 20,940.00 2,430.00 962.50 3,392.50 BALANCE SHEET ASSETS Cash & Investments 0.00 46,684.66 (764.12) 45,920.54 Net Fixed Assets 0.00 0.00 Total Assets 0.00 46,684.66 (764.12) 45,920.54 LIABILITIES & FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts Payable 0.00 0.00 Due Other Funds 0.00 0.00 Total Liabilities 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fund Balance Fund Balance 35,000.00 38,702.00 0.00 38,702.00 Excess of Revenues/(Expenditures) (35,000.00) 7,982.66 (764.12) 7,218.54 Total Fund Balance 0.00 46,684.66 (764.12) 45,920.54 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance 0.00 46,684.66 (764.12) 45,920.54 g:\Excel\TWD\Monthly\94-5isbs.xls Sign-in Sheet for - Tigard Water District March 29, 1999 Name (Please Print) Would you like to speak to the Board? \/(=A/2OC A) PE NN'-1 _ Tle-Y-\ c C) kS `w b\ ?)401.{ba.r0 11,+I I. lei ,C /,,71:1 ,r-/di i tr ft-/VSO W V I 1/ FA 6 Laki--' MAO— rs .., "7,52,-„,- ,a ...,--/ --_--ari, ,k.9„,,,4- f.,d,,„ei 4;04- l- 3,),Q.,e,,-- 4Jfi. D liE/ *67/vyv Jrr c \AWt\ 4?,./sn,_. Y'l C.4.4.)1/4.1. Oe stlelkSaIVI_ -...._ (04-4- 2_-_, A e?a.-r.r -,:.> Xc}:f, Ar- -)Z--- 4-5g--- . ' - 7(-14 ee---it .=X/Irrl / (/11Th Attendance Record - Public Session Tigard Water District $oard Meeting Monday, March 29, 1999 5 � t s i ,q '� ., ' ���e RC-10J2_. ( NiCt-,09 t \ 4 r (J 13,7 45. ✓2 � / 7,33-5--Sid �o04?0 / / er c-C J///47 / Y T OC1 -)--?0 701-o? I I k)(illn( I E I Y6 StA)StvvIvc-ae., t_in . 9C) C0 ,51 C\ 4 L-1( N_C EQ--2-Kt—C60Q4, p �JeI Nifty Veitlee, e ikAMOAJ 14 1305/Cq CCK c3100l, 090 -60 eAti rim. It)424,120 ie. r-. /4 / -70 )11- z to - ,7 '7 > &ry ho 1/44,, , X30 Z s.V JA-e7A-3 , C( 11,441/1a- 6k-in I q 1706 Sw Ph Cf 6 2L/ zocto • Apr 23 1999 15:55:42 Via Fax > Mr. Michael Miller Page Bel Of *1112 Ama_ ilituaiLln visit www.ewwa.org/waterwk.htm for hotlinks to documents and sites reported in this issue. Volume 8 No.17 American Water Works Association • Dedicated to Safe Drinking Water April 23, 1999 SDWA violations Note ofAppreciatkn decrease in 1997 AWWA staff sincerely thank all AWWA members who EPA's latest SDWA compliance fig- ures shows that in 1997 there was a have conveyed their thoughts,prayers and sympathies in 31 percent reduction in the total response to this week's tragic events at nearby Columbine number of public water system viola- High School in Littleton,Colo.While several staff members tions of maximum contaminant levels, have children or other family members who attend or work at treatment techniques and significant CHS, none was physically harmed.All staff members and monitoring and reporting violations. their families,however,are suffering along with the rest of the The 1997 compliance report, issued this week (call 800-426-4791 or community and we appreciate the comforting condolences visit www.epa.govlsafewater/annual) from the members of the AWWA family as we grieve these as part of Earth Day celebrations, also deep and sorrowful losses. reveals that 95 percent of all systems and 92 percent of community water - systems reported no violations of any health-based standards and that the EPA releases UCMR for public comment percentage of water systems with vie- EPA this week released its proposed Unregulated Contaminant lotions fell between one and three per- Monitoring Rule,which significantly revises current requirements as cent in every category. mandated by the 1996 SDWA amendments. Under the proposal(see While the total number of reported www.epa.gov/ogwdw/standardfpp/ucmpp.html),all 2,774 large violations dropped from 141,617 in 1996 to 97,661 in 1997,the percentage community systems and only a representative sample of about 800 small of systems reporting violations community and noncommunity-nontransient systems would be required to remained unchanged. Eighty-five per- conduct"assessment monitoring"for 10 organic chemicals,including cent of the total violations were of sig- MTBE,and one microbial contaminant from the 1993 Contaminant Meant M&R requirements, and most Candidate List.The rule,which will provide a 45-day comment period violations of health-based standards from the day it is published in the Federal Register,also describes and treatment techniques were of the procedures for selecting the national representative sample of small Surface Water Treatment Rule, fol- systems,the frequency and schedule for monitoring,and procedures for lowed by the Total Coliform Rule. electronic reporting of data. Other key findings: The list of 11 contaminants for which assessment monitoring must - 79 percent of all systems reported begin in January 2001 includes 2,4-dinitrotoluene;2,6-dinitrotoluene; no violations of any kind. • States issued 913 enforcement DCPA monoacid;DCPA diacid;4,4'-DDE;EPIC;molinate,MTBE, actions, including 632 administrative nitrobenzene,terbacil and Aeromonas hydroplcla. orders without penalty, 220 AOs with EPA has also proposed two other lists of CCL contaminants for future penalty, 60 civil referrals and one crim- monitoring only after EPA publishes UCMR revisions that specify analytical inal referral_ methods and monitoring locations and dates.The first is a group of 14 • EPA issued 266 notices of viola- organics identified for a"screening survey"to be conducted by tion,392 AOs, 12 complaints for penalty approximately 300 of systems required to do assessment monitoring.The and four referrals for civil action_ second is a group of seven microbials identified for"prescreen testing"by up to 200 systems found to be vulnerable to such contaminants. TIME IS RUNNING OUT 1999 Annual Conference & Exposition GAS-�E TOPPNI June 20-24 /Chicago IL For complete conference info: www.awwa.org Apr 23 1999 15:56:33 Via Fax -> Mr. Michael Miller Page e82 llf M11Z _ VA 1 YX April 23, 1999 Hot topics influenced wellfield and concluded that Willamette water produced by a new treatment plant using granular MEETING POSTPONED.Scheduling conflicts activated carbon,filtration and ozone disinfection will be '"eal have forced EPA to postpone the May 4 public meeting "as good as any drinking water currently being to begin discussing SDWA research needs through 2025 delivered"in the Portland area.Regarding supply as part of this year's 25th SDWA anniversary program. reliability,they said the 7,280-square-mile Willamette No new date has been set.Call Joan Harrigan Family at basin with 11 storage reservoirs offered better certainty 202-260-6672 for details. and flexibility than Portland's 102-square-mile,two- MTBE.EPA's blue ribbon panel of experts studying reservoir system.They also favored the lower capital and public health issues tied to the use of MTBE and other O&M costs of a Willamette-based system,which fuel oxygenates will hold their fourth meeting April 29- translate into lower average bimonthly rates starting in 30 in Arlington,Va.For more information,contact Karen 2010.Portland officials,who have proposed a long-term Smith at 202-564-9674. supply plan that would cost the city an estimated$66.5 million,most recently asked the council to allow State briefs residents to vote on the matter. In a related development,a coalition of seven NORTH DAKOTA.Hundreds of millions of dollars Clackamas County and Washington County water of revenue from the settlement of a suit against tobacco systems(including Tigard)that have been exploring the makers will help pay for North Dakota flood-control and viability of the Willamette as a water supply have water supply projects under a long-term funding plan organized a May 24 workshop on competition in the approved by state lawmakers.Prompted in large part by water utility industry.The Willamette Water Supply recent floods that devastated Grand Forks,the new law Agency event will explore trends toward privatization establishes a plan for selling$84.8 million worth of and public-private partnerships.Call 503-642-1511. bonds to provide state funds for several projects to I'L:XAS.The Edwards Aquifer Authority recently control floods and to supply drinking and irrigation approved a $16 million research effort to answer critical water,including the Southwest Pipeline Project. questions on how to optimize regional management of Expected to be signed by Gov.Ed Schafer,the measure the natural underground reservoir that provides the bulk establishes a Water Development Trust Fund that will of SanAntonio's drinking water.With an eye toward Narais receive tobacco-settlement money,which will be used to meeting state-imposed deadlines for limiting withdrawals pay off the bonds.It also authorizes use of secondary by 2008 unless yield can be increased while meeting funding sources to pay off the bonds,including direct certain minimum springflow rates,the Aquifer appropriations and up to$6.5 million in biennial earnings Optimization Plan will address biological assessments, of the state-owned Bank of North Dakota.In addition, flowpathimodeling studies and recharge enhancement, the law authorizes the BND to extend an$84.8 million including possible return of excess springflows and line of credit to the State Water Commission to provide controlling water losses to range vegetation. interim financing until the bonds are issued. ALABAMA.The U.S.District Court for the OREGON.As Tigard City Council members prepare Southern District of Alabama recently ruled that two to vote April 27 on a long-term water supply plan,a Louisiana and Ohio water suppliers do not have standing citizens task force has recommended that the city build a to sue to recover atrazine testing and treatment costs $42.7 million plant to treat Willamette River water from Novartis Crop Protection,the major maker of the starting in 2007 instead of continuing to rely heavily on herbicide that is the most widely found pesticide water imported from nearby Portland.The task force, contaminant in farm-area water supplies.The court which voted 22-3 in favor of the Willamette option, dismissed the case after finding that neither Iberville described its findings during an April 13 public hearing Parish(La.)Waterworks District Number 3 nor Bowling on the hot public topic that has been debated for almost Green,Ohio,had violated the federal standard for four years.After two months of work,the task force atrazine and neither faced an imminent threat of expressed concern about the quality of Portland's violation.The attorney representing District No.3 said unfiltered Bull Run supply and Columbia River- the plaintiffs had no comment on the case at this point. WATERWEEK is published weekly Ey the American Water Works Association, 6665 W. Quincy Ave.. Denver CO 80235_ Copyright © 1999 by AWWA. Distribution limited to recipient facility. Editor: Mark Scharfenaker, phone: 303-347-6263, fax 303-794-7310, e-mail: mscharfe@awwa_org.To subscribe call 303-347-6167. Internet site- http://www.awwa_orglwaterwk.ntm_ Expanded reporting of selected stories in AWWA MAINSTREAM. 'rlrl�i Lead Summit, April 6, 1999 i if.kke i Li- ' _ Edwards Rosenberger . Ireland Seierstad Casson r The Water Bureau sponsored a second Lead Summit on community exposure to lead. Stacey Edwards,outreach and public education coordinator for the Bureau's Lead Hazard Reduction Program,co-facilitated.Mike Rosenberger provided an overview of the Bureau's projects to reduce community exposure to lead and related public involvement.Along with community and health professionals, Curt Ireland,Bert Seierstad(Lead Hazard Reduction Program Manager),and Kathy Casson attended,representing the Water Resources Management group. Residential Irrigation The Cities of Gresham,Hillsboro,and Tigard and the Tualatin Valley Water District will survey an additional This spring the Water Bureau is expanding its successful 200 residential landscapes.Participating water utilities pilot program of the last two years to provide free are evaluating the program's ability to manage peak landscape surveys to residential customers to reduce season use,an important regional conservation goal. outdoor watering.Over 500 participants throughout the metropolitan area's pilot program have rated the Water: A Cash Crop? program highly-and used an average of 19%less Along the southern coastline of India,farmers who once water than neighbors who did not participate.Since grew rice in their fields are now making more money water use often doubles in the summer due to garden selling water from their groundwater supplies and and turf irrigation,these outdoor water savings reduce underground reservoirs to Kanyakumari,a coastal city peak consumption and lower water bills. which is one of India's most popular tourist destinations. Homes which used more than 60 units(45,000 gallons) Pipelines from farms lead directly to crammed hotels. of water for both of the last two summer quarters are Regional planners in southern India suggest that the the target audience. Letters have gone out this month water sales are a poor solution to a water crisis.The inviting homeowners to participate in a free landscape water table is dropping.Little has been done to capture survey.This year's program will serve 550 Portland households on a first-come,first-served basis. After rainwater falling in the region and store it in reservoirs. 1 Despite millions of dollars spent to build 24 desalination the 1 /z hour survey,homeowners receive an analysis of plants,only one is currently functional.The rest are out the survey information which includes optimal watering schedules for the homeowner's lawns and gardens.In of order because government employees failed to maintain them-according to a water conservation some cases,where the surveyor recommends it,a licensed landscape contractor will install a rain sensor or spokesperson in the region.New federal programs are working to install filtration systems and build new irrigation time clock. reservoirs to tap rainwater.In some communities The surveyors are participants in horticulture programs citizens are taking up shovels to create new tanks and at Mt.Hood and Portland Community Colleges or reservoirs and clear old canals them'selv`es.Southern Oregon State University's Master Gardener Extension India is dotted with catchment tanks and reservoirs that Program.They will provide a strong knowledge of plant Indian rulers built in the 7th and 8th centuries.Some selection and customer-oriented focus to the program. planners hope those systems might be used again. Source: U.S. Water News Online,April, 1999 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT INCOME STATEMENT & BALANCE SHEET As of March 31, 1999 INCOME STATEMENT I Accounts I I FY BUDGET I I Prior Y-T- D I I Monthly I ' Y-T- D I REVENUES 1% PY Water Sales Revenue 9,300.00 8,889.09 8,889.09 Interest Earned 1,500.00 1,523.57 198.38 1,721.95 Recovered Expenditures 0.00 0.00 Total Revenues 10,800.00 10,412.66 198.38 10,611.04 EXPENDITURES Professional Services 3,580.00 162.00 162.00 Contractual Services 5,000.00 210.00 80.50 290.50 Special Department Expenses 1,300.00 0.00 0.00 Office Supplies & Expenses 0.00 0.00 0.00 Advertising & Elections 4,300.00 0.00 882.00 882.00 Dues & Subscriptions 1,010.00 476.00 476.00 Travel Food & Lodging 650.00 0.00 0.00 Education & Training 400.00 0.00 0.00 Insurance 2,000.00 1,582.00 1,582.00 Contingency/Reserve 2,700.00 0.00 0.00 Total Expenditures 20,940.00 2,430.00 962.50 3,392.50 BALANCE SHEET ASSETS Cash & Investments 0.00 46,684.66 (764.12) 45,920.54 Net Fixed Assets 0.00 0.00 Total Assets 0.00 46,684.66 (764.12) 45,920.54 LIABILITIES & FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts Payable 0.00 0.00 Due Other Funds 0.00 0.00 Total Liabilities 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fund Balance Fund Balance 35,000.00 38,702.00 0.00. 38,702.00 Excess of Revenues/(Expenditures) (35,000.00) 7,982.66 (764.12) 7,218.54 Total Fund Balance 0.00 46,684.66 (764.12) 45,920.54 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance 0.00 46,684.66 (764.12) 45,920.54 g:\Excel\TWD\Monthly\94-5isbsxls Attendance Record - Public Session Tigard Water District Board Meeting Monday, March 29, 1999 T w�.�....�,��x.s.�..�..w. _u.MF.y.W'.a�s.. c • 0-11( < \sDnvIe_____ 6e, if — 51 F 13„7/5 ,/2 "r (4z 7 ‘2„, - 202 - 7/6/ W-11-6.44-7 Yi() . 6() -t.4)/q/JE--Lo -5- 0 -201-0S c?micettidaAg( /s r Vo SuAl vc.o__.e/1 v\ S9O & .S-1 US- -Or G4 (Q-2_4—(e)OCY p ---fp tch- Vevnee. OPtiomotO I o �ox5%? CASK Reno(, 6. 90-606 a- M7i t ( .M. tc.)at-zRcltr ,r-�, 14/ -20 .S ' ) q- s Yo - (Q 7 ? > & ry how .,-s 1. 13o 21 skl JA-c-z k Lo `k 7 S 7 Crkfh/la- 6,kv Iq '706 Sw6hCi 5z`i2V-V Sign-in Sheet for Tigard Water District March 29, 1999 Name (Please Print) Would you like to speak to the Board? =ArZOCIAI PENNT ?)ctli h,Gt,lrobq.tl f c /7/p/c-/.,�:/ ' t) 'VS o IV Key1+� j- vt wal-' WkJ* Us 41c.A CA (0. eteita, / �>tv r e1 r� 'err w ,417//Nn Apr 23 1999 15:55:4Z Via Fax -> Mr. Michael Miller Page 881 Of 6112 Visitfor www.ewwaorghwatocumentserwk_him hotlinks to dand sites reported in this issue_ Volume 8 No.17 American Water Works Association • Dedicated to Sate Drinking Water April 23, 1999 SDWA violations Note ofAppreciation decrease in 1997 EPA's latest SDWA compliance fig- AWWA staff sincerely thank all AWWA members who ures shows that in 1997 there was a have conveyed their thoughts,prayers and sympathies in 31 percent reduction in the total response to this week's tragic events at nearby Columbine number of public water system viola- High School in Littleton,Colo.While several staff members tions of maximum contaminant levels, have children or other family members who attend or work at treatment techniques and significant CHS, none was physically harmed.All staff members and monitoring and reporting violations_ their families,however,are suffering along with the rest of the The 1997 compliance report, issued this week (call 800-426-4791 or community and we appreciate the comforting condolences visit www_epa_gov/safewater/annual) from the members of the AWWA family as we grieve these as part of Earth Day celebrations, also deep and sorrowful losses_ reveals that 95 percent of all systems and 92 percent of community water • systems reported no violations of any health-based standards and that the EPA releases UCMR for public comment percentage of water systems with vio- EPA this week released its proposed Unregulated Contaminant lotions fell between one and three per- Monitoring Rule,which significantly revises current requirements as cent in every category" mandated by the 1996 SDWA amendments. Under the proposal(see While the total number of reported violations dropped from 141,617 in ww°''•epi'gov/ogwdw/standardfpplucmpp.html),all 2,774large 1996 to 97,661 in 1997,the percentage community systems and only a representative sample of about 800 small of systems reporting violations community and noncommunity-nontransient systems would be required to remained unchanged. Eighty-five per- conduct"assessment monitoring"for 10 organic chemicals,including cent of the total violations were of sig- M'17St,and one microbial contaminant from the 1998 Contaminant nificant M&R requirements, and most Candidate List.The rule,which will provide a 45-day comment period violations of health-based standards from the day it is published in the Federal Register,also describes and treatment techniques were of the procedures for selecting the national representative sample of small Surface Water Treatment Rule, fol- systems,the frequency and schedule for monitoring,and procedures for lowed by the Total Colikx in Rule. electronic reporting of data. Other key findings: The list of 11 contaminants for which assessment monitoring must •79 percent of all systems reported begin in January 2001 includes 2,4-dinitrotoluene;2,6-dinitrotoluene; no violations of any kind. • States issued 913 enforcement DCPA monoacid;DCPA diacid;4,4'-DDE;EPIC;=finale,MTBE, actions, including 632 administrative nitrobenzene,terbacil andAeramoreas hydrrgphila. orders without penalty, 220 AOs with EPA has also proposed two other lists of CCL contaminants for future penalty,60 civil referrals and one°rim- monitoring only after EPA publishes UCMR revisions that specify analytical final referral_ methods and monitoring locations and dates.The first is a group of 14 • EPA issued 266 notices of viola- organics identified for a"screening survey"to be conducted by ton,3W AOs,12 complaints for penalty approximately 300 of systems required to do assessment monitoring.The and four referrals for civil action_ second is a group of seven microbials identified for"prescreen testing"by up to 200 systems found to be vulnerable to such contaminants. TIME IS RUNNING OUT 1999 Annual Conference & ExpositionREGIs R 10001 I AN\ June 20-24 /Chicago IL For complete conference info: www:awwa.arg Apr 23 1999 15:56:33 Via Fax -> Mr. Michael Miller Page 082 Of 082 • jokilx April 23, 1999 Hot topics influenced wellfield and concluded that Willamette water produced by a new treatment plant using granular MEETING POSTPONED.Scheduling conflicts activated carbon,filtration and ozone disinfection will be have forced EPA to postpone the May 4 public meeting "as good as any drinking water currently being to begin discussing SDWA research needs through 2025 delivered"in the Portland area.Regarding supply as part of this year's 25th SDWA anniversary program. reliability,they said the 7,280-square-mile Willamette No new date has been set.Call Joan Harrigan Fancily at basin with 11 storage reservoirs offered better certainty 202-260-6672 for details. and flexibility than Portland's 102-square-mile,two- MTBE.EPA's blue ribbon panel of experts studying reservoir system.They also favored the lower capital and public health issues tied to the use of MTBE and other O&M costs of a Willamette-based system,which fuel oxygenates will hold their fourth meeting April 29- translate into lower average bimonthly rates starting in 30 in Arlington,Va.For more information,contact Karen 2010.Portland officials,who have proposed a long-term Smith at 202-564-9674. supply plan that would cost the city an estimated$66.5 million,most recently asked the council to allow State briefs residents to vote on the matter. In a related development,a coalition of seven NORTH DAKOTA.Hundreds of millions of dollars Clackamas County and Washington County water of revenue from the settlement of a suit against tobacco systems(including Tigard)that have been exploring the makers will help pay for North Dakota flood-control and viability of the Willamette as a water supply have water supply projects under a long-term funding plan organized a May 24 workshop on competition in the approved by state lawmakers.Prompted in large part by water utility industry.The Willamette Water Supply recent floods that devastated Grand Forks,the new law Agency event will explore trends toward privatization establishes a plan for selling$84.8 million worth of and public-private partnerships.Call 503-642-1511. bonds to provide state funds for several projects to TEXAS.The Edwards Aquifer Authority recently control floods and to supply drinking and irrigation approved a $16 million research effort to answer critical water,including the Southwest Pipeline Project. questions on how to optimize regional management of Expected to be signed by Gov Ed Schafer,the measure the natural underground reservoir that provides the bulk establishes a Water Development Trust Fund that will of SanAntonio's drinking water.With an eye toward receive tobacco-settlement money,which will be used to meeting state-imposed deadlines for limiting withdrawals pay off the bonds.It also authorizes use of secondary by 2008 unless yield can be increased while meeting funding sources to pay off the bonds,including direct certain minimum springllow rates,the Aquifer appropriations and up to$6.5 million in biennial earnings Optimization Plan will address biological assessments, of the state-owned Bank of North Dakota.In addition, flowpath/modeling studies and recharge enhancement, the law authorizes the BND to extend an$84.8 million including possible return of excess springflows and line of credit to the State Water Commission to provide controlling water losses to range vegetation. interim financing until the bonds are issued. ALABAMA.The U.S.District Court for the OREGON.As Tigard City Council members prepare Southern District of Alabama recently ruled that two to vote April 27 on a long-term water supply plan,a Louisiana and Ohio water suppliers do not have standing citizens task force has recommended that the city build a to sue to recover atrazine testing and treatment costs $42.7 million plant to treat Willamette River water from Novartis Crop Protection,the major maker of the starting in 2007 instead of continuing to rely heavily on herbicide that is the most widely found pesticide water imported from nearby Portland.The task force, contaminant in farm-area water supplies.The court which voted 22-3 in favor of the Willamette option, dismissed tlx case after finding that neither Iberville described its findings during an April 13 public hearing Parish(La.)Waterworks District Number 3 nor Bowling on the hot public topic that has been debated for almost Green.Ohio,had violated the federal standard for four years.After two months of work,the task force atrazine and neither faced an imminent threat of expressed concern about the quality of Portland's violation.The attorney representing District No.3 said unfiltered Bull Run supply and Columbia River- the plaintiffs had no comment on the case at this point. WATERWEEK is published weekly by the American Water Works Association, 6666 W. Quincy Ave_, Denver CO 80235. Copyright © 1999 by AWWA. Distribution limited to recipient facility_ Editor: Mark Scharfenaker, phone: 303-347-6263, fax 303-794-7310, e-mail: mscharfeeawwa_org.To subscribe call 303-347-6167 Internet site: http://www_awwa_orc/waterwk.htm_ Expanded reporting of selected stories in AWWA MAniS1REAM. April 6, 1999 To: Tigard Water District Tigard City Council From: D. H. Lee Subject: Proposed Willamette River Water Supply System Please find below several comments on the proposed Willamette River Supply System preliminary engineering report published Dec. 1998: Appendix: Section 3 Raw Water Oualitv This section contains data taken over a 2 year period(April '94 to April '96). Unfortunately there are no meaningful data presented from April '96 until present so it is impossible to tell if the water quality trends are staying the same, degrading or improving. For example, the turbidity, total coliforms, and fecal coliforms trends appear to be increasing which would be consistent with an increase in the agricultural and land development upstream from the collection site. Without data from '96 until current this is impossible to assess. Basically, we don't know what the quality of the of the Willamette is today. Assuming that agricultural development upstream will continue to rise, the report does not address the controls that will need to be put in place to insure that the quality of the Willamette will not degrade proportionately. Appendix: Section 3 Raw Water Oualitv This section only contains data from the Willamette with NO corresponding data from the Portland water supply over the same time period. Without these data it is impossible to determine if the proposed Willamette River water quality will be equal to, better, or worse than the current Portland supply. I can't see how anyone would be convinced to support the Willamette River Water System project without this detailed comparison. Section 3: Water Supply Facilities There is no detailed discussion in this section of how the water quality will be monitored real time, what the shut down limits will be, and what procedures would be in place to divert or shut down the water supply should the water quality degrade below current and future regulation. If the filtration system fails, what is the backup plan. Section 7: Financial Evaluation And Analysis There is no sensitivity analysis of costs in this section. If the cost actually are higher by 50, 100, 200%, then what are the consequences. This needs some detailed analysis because of the complexity of the project and the uncertainty in how efficient the system will be in delivering the required water quality,the costs could easily increase by 2X. Sincerely, D-H. Lee 14545 S.W. Chardonnay Ave. Tigard, Oregon 97224 PS It is hard to believe the Dr. Wilson would conclude that there is a high degree of certainty that no adverse affects will occur in the Willamette River based on ONE data point. You might ask any statistician in any of the Portland/Oregon Universities what they think of such a ridiculous statement. CITY OF TIGARD WILLAMETTE RIVER MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT March, 1999 Background The City of Tigard is currently conducting raw water quality monitoring of the Willamette River near Wilsonville. The City began a 12-month monitoring program in July of 1998. The City's program is a continuation of an ongoing effort to characterize water quality of the Willamette River, an effort which has been funded by regional water utilities since 1994. A previous sampling program was in operation at Wilsonville, Oregon from April 1994 to July 1996. The City's current program maintains the emphasis on understanding the physical, chemical and biological parameters which are of interest for water treatment and public health. This sampling program includes regularly scheduled sampling for a variety of drinking water quality parameters, microbiological contaminants, trace metals, inorganic chemicals, and synthetic organic chemicals. The sampling program has been designed to encompass current and anticipated federal and state monitoring requirements, in addition to better understanding'the presence of chemicals which are in use in the Willamette River Basin. The water quality information collected in this ongoing sampling will continue to inform decisions about potential future treatment requirements for this supply. The City's program includes weekly sampling for routine water quality parameters which are relevant to drinking water treatment, as well as weekly and monthly sampling for standard physical, chemical and biological indicators of water quality. The program includes quarterly sampling over a range of river flow conditions for an exhaustive list of organic and inorganic chemicals, including: • parameters regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, • the entire EPA Contaminant Candidate List (CCL) which comprises all constituents which could be subject to drinking water regulation sometime in the future, • all pesticides and herbicides which were detected by the USGS from anywhere in the Willamette Basin; and • 25 suspected endocrine disruptors. Table 1 summarizes the contaminants monitored under the City's program. City of Tigard page 1 Raw Water Monitoring Program-Quarterly Report Field Measurements Water quality sampling results which are available at this time for the City of Tigard's program encompass a seven-month period from July 10, 1998 to February 24, 1999. Raw water turbidity was measured weekly in the field, and was below 5 NTU for the late summer/early fall period prior to the fall rains. Turbidities increased dramatically during the winter months with a recorded high of 233 NTU on December 29, 1998. Total organic carbon during the low flow period averaged approximately 2.3 mg/L. TOC also increased during winter months with the recorded highest level of 5.3 mg/L on January 19, 1999. The Willamette River during the late summer and fall period can be characterized as a soft, low turbidity water with a low organic content. Although the Willamette River is more turbid in the winter months, it can still be characterized as a soft water with low organic content. This is consistent with findings of previous years. Bacteriological Quality Overall bacteriological quality of the river during the late summer and fall period was good. Total numbers of coliform colonies during the first four months ranged from 30 to 500 colonies/100 mL. Total coliform counts increased to greater than 1,600 colonies/ 100 mL from November through February in response to rains. This is consistent with patterns observed in previous years. It should be noted that the coliform counts currently being observed are about ten times higher than have been observed during previous phases of the Willamette sampling program. The results currently being obtained are more consistent with historical data observed by the ODEQ from 1982 to 1993. The cause of this discrepancy is most likely a difference in laboratory methods between the Portland Water Bureau lab, which conducted the analysis in previous phases, and the current commercial lab,AmTest Oregon. Giardia and Cryptosporidium Monthly samples for Giardia and Cryptosporidium were collected in August, September, November, and December of 1998, and January and February of 1999. Presumptive Giardia counts ranged from non-detectable to 318 cysts per 100 liters. "Presumptive counts" mean that using fluorescent antibody staining, an object can be identified under the microscope with the correct size and shape of a Giardia cyst. No Giardia cysts were confirmed in any of these three samples. "Confirmed counts" have been verified by examining the object at higher magnification. Presumptive Cryptosporidium counts ranged from non-detectable to 140 cysts per 100 Iiters of water. No Cryptosporidium oocysts were confirmed in any sample. A summary of results is presented in Table 2. City of Tigard page 2 Raw Water Monitoring Program-Quarterly Report Metals Twenty-seven metals and inorganic chemicals were sampled in three quarterly events, on August 12 and November 2, 1998, and January 26, 1999. The first two sampling events corresponded to low flow, low turbidity conditions in the River. The third sampling event targeted high flow, high turbidity conditions. In general, most metals were detected at levels in the hundredths and thousands of a part per million. Regulated inorganic constituents were either not detected, or were detected at levels well below the treated water standard. Aluminum was detected at 0.25 mg/L and 0.12 mg/L for the two fall sampling events, and 1.1 mg/L for the winter sampling event. Aluminum is a common dietary component, with the average dietary intake being about 20 mg per day (AWWA, 1990). Aluminum is also common in treated waters, particularly those where alum is used as a coagulant in the treatment process. The USEPA has proposed a secondary standard for this contaminant of 0.05 mg/L, primarily to ensure that coagulated material is removed ahead of the distribution system. A summary of metals and inorganics results is given in Table 3. Organic Compounds Quarterly organic chemical scans were conducted on August 12 and November 2, 1998, and January 26, 1999. The first two sampling events were scheduled to capture low flow, low turbidity conditions. The January sampling event targeted high flow, high turbidity conditions. A total of 170 organic compounds were analyzed, including regulated contaminants, constituents on the EPA Contaminant Candidate List, detected pesticides and herbicides as part of the USGS Study of Dissolved Pesticides in the Willamette Basin, 1996 and suspected endocrine disruptors. Table 4 presents the results of all sampling to date. In the August sampling, the following results were obtained: • no detects were registered in 64 semi-volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 525.5; • no detects in 19 acid extractable compounds (primarily phenols); • no detects of aldicarb pesticides; • no detects of 15 herbicides by EPA Method 515.1; • no detects of diquat,paraquat,EDB and DBCP; • no detects of 14 organophosphorous pesticides; • no detects of 41 nitrogen and phosphorous pesticides by EPA method 507; • no detects of 64 regulated volatile organic chemicals; • no detects of 30 pesticides regulated under the SDWA; and • no detect of dioxin, with a method detection limit of 3.1 picograms per liter (10"9 mg/L or one-billionth of a part per million) The regulated herbicide simazine was detected Montgomery Laboratories method (ML614,619,8141) at a level of 1.7 ug/L. This herbicide was not detected in the same City of Tigard page 3 Raw Water Monitoring Program-Quarterly Report water sample by the two EPA methods which were applied for detection of semi-volatile compounds or nitrogen/phosphorous pesticides (EPA 525.5 and EPA 507). Resampling on September 23, 1998 for N/P pesticides did not detect the presence of simazine. Simazine has not been detected in previous phases of the raw water sampling program. Simazine is a regulated organic chemical under the Safe Drinking Water Act, with an MCL of 4 ug/L. It is anticipated that simazine would be removed by ozone and GAC treatment. In November, the following results were obtained: • Simazine was not detected by EPA Methods 525.5 and 507; • All organic compounds described above were non-detects, with the exception of the detection of the regulated volatile organic chemical dichloromethane (also called methylene chloride) at 1.2 ug/L. The proposed MCL for this contaminant is 5 ug/L in finished water. It should be noted that laboratory contamination is a frequent confounder of occurrence data for this chemical (AWWA, 1990). • There was no detection of dioxin, with a method detection limit of 1.5 picograms per liter(10-9 mg/L or one-billionth of a part per million) In January, the following results were obtained: • All organic compounds described above were non-detects; • Simazine was not detected; • Dichloromethane (also called methylene chloride)was not detected; • There was no detection of dioxin, with a method detection limit of 1.5 picograms per liter(10"9 mg/L or one-billionth of a part per million.) Winter River Conditions Severe flooding throughout the Willamette Basin was experienced in December. High river flow conditions broke loose the intake line from its submerged mooring in early December. Sampling was interrupted in December while the intake line was repositioned. The raw water sampling pump was submerged by flood waters at the end of December. Sampling was on hold until January 12, 1999 when the intake pump was replaced. Future Sampling Activity The next quarterly sampling event will occur in May, 1999, following the spring application of pesticides and herbicides in the Willamette Basin. The sampling event will be scheduled to capture runoff events following the pesticide and herbicide applications. City of Tigard page 4 Raw Water Monitoring Program-Quarterly Report TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF GIARDIA AND CRYPTO SAMPLING RESULTS DATE GIARDIA GIARDIA CRYPTO CRYPTO PRESUMPTIVE CONFIRMED PRESUMPTIVE CONFIRMED 8/12/98 ND ND 38 ND 9/23/98 50 ND ND ND 11/2/98 - 180 ND 140 ND 12/23/98 41 ND 14 ND 1/26/99 180 ND <44 ND 2/17/99 318 ND <18 ND City of Tigard page 5 Raw Water Monitoring Program-Quarterly Report TABLE 3' SUMMARY OF METALS AND INORGANICS RESULTS I CONCENTRATION IN MG/L I I I CONSTITUENT 8/12/98 11/2/98 1/26/99 MCL OR REGULATORY STATUS I 1 I aluminum 0.25 0.12 1.1 (priority for health and treatment research antimony nd nd nd 10.006 mg/L arsenic 0.002 nd nd 10.05 mg/L barium 0.0066 0.005 0.013 12.0 mg/L beryllium nd nd nd 10.004 mg/L boron nd - nd priority for regulatory determination bromide nd nd nd no regulation anticipated cadmium nd nd nd 0.005 mg/L chromium 0.016 0.0034 0.0097 0.1 mg/L 1 copper 0.004 0.0046 0.0057 regulated by treatment technique cyanide nd nd nd 0.2 mg/L fluoride nd nd nd 4.0 mg/L iron 0.34 0.23 2.2 no regulation anticipated lead 0.00072 0.0008 0.00057 regulated by treatment technique magensium 2.1 1.8 1.85 no regulation anticipated manganese 0.028 0.016 0.042 priority for regulatory determination mercury nd nd nd 0.002 mg/L nickel nd nd nd no regulation anticipated nitrate 0.26 0.21 0.63 10 mg/L nitrite nd nd nd 1 mg/L selenium nd nd nd 0.05 mg/L silver nd nd nd no regulation anticipated sodium 7.2 6.5 3.24 priority for health research sulfate 4.9 3.0 2.4 priority for regulatory determination thallium nd nd nd 0.002 mg/L zinc 0.0069 nd 0.0012 no regulation anticipated City of Tigard page 6 Raw Water Monitoring Program-Quarterly Report References American Water Works Association. Water Quality and Treatment. McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1990. City of Tigard page 7 Raw Water Monitoring Program- Quarterly Report ' .Itl/ige LUl ilii ..•...x.11 110.1,.11.U11a .111u %...i..1114111b "... 1W.t- v. )• ~,/•4 . • ♦. o l,` 1.Y91� goods and services that are available in the city. ', ll ' "' tel'- , I o Local residents will, of course,have time to express their con- �'• .�,} 4 , �"� C. cern at • various stages of the process—a process that will proba- '. r bly take years to complete.But anyone who cares about the city's —„�" _ ,-'- rI 40. west side should make plans to attend Tuesday's meeting. It's a • ''. 7071—"etto17: . 7111Itteka.cottlitit.... • • • • chance to influence decisions that Will touch the.lives of future I sw - - cola Luce rC� generations. • • ._._ i . . • ' . ' ri — • Rver wouldprovide .ci Pot esters to . ofVlew With high-qualitywater ; .. Miller needs • .lack • • • to become an . In your last issue,a letter to the editor ap ,. .: •and the test Bull Run water).Rifer to the March' .R '• ' 'advocate for. peered from Joseph R.Leary III that was highly' • 1999;issue of the Booties.Ferfy Messenger for • • critical of Mayor Lehan's article in the Boons : .study'names and dates.' • '. •. ': • ::' • Day Road site Ferry Messenger on the water issue,as well.as a • 'Hecited concerns about the disihergea&+om' • day needed by Wilsonville by the year 2003.The Some elected o8icials been separate ettIele is the Measedge a on the setae;',, ?'s ''dte N.awtterg•Wastm Watet'tl•eattneat Plant.'I1»s., . •P WaterBureau will not be able to deliver centered in partisan politics. Tl issue.head both,articles and find his analysis ., 1'•ddb's•emits 3 ril4 S l italloas'per day into a river..., ..that needed volume until approximately 2010. • actions are based on furthering t lacking in logic:' '. ' •• ,t;' 't.:' ; •::vithlan'avet :fro i�f..i. .thousand million gal...;,t;The costa are staggering. I party's position at all cost. Th Bottrat`ticles'clearly.spell oiit all testing coni '. .lofi:i p fr day;a dlstibrit'ge!easily treated)iy the ' ':'.1' The Flatland model costs,with Wilsonville as I elected officials carefully avoid t feted,with obviotii conclusion the : . Wilsaitville iVaten''I'neattnedt Plant.Dis-.: ' in stances that mayrun counter P p a tenant,will total$69 sulfite by the year 2010, g Winameae'Riwx wilt the safest, . from the Smttiwitch is':•: •' 'the standard line — e' 4 produce. � Falb plant, ,.,r with Wilsonville s sham$23 million.The 1�' quality water iri the region after the install�of'"1161.____,_•141111l pope'plant,•COOtaiui iio d'ioxiiis,and.. 'r when such stances may,be nec • 'Willamette River model by the year 2010,with . the water treatmtnt.plant.Testing by Mold : :.' n those:etnission,s ate easily treated by e.: '• grosonmie as a part-owner.will cost a total of 'y to resolve real-life,,real=ti gomery.Watson was thorough and supported hy, • ..plehhed, iilsanville wate r n eatmetit Plant. .". • • $20 mivion.with art-ow ville's share$7 million. problems. • both the EPA,USGS and the Portland Wa(et Bu- '• ' More than 250 otgatiic chemicals,evetything': Rep.Krummel took a courage ever naught about`or•fgund in isle tx neetlr' By the year 2030,die ta6al Portland model stand..for the minority report These articles addressed,among other gs, i :C6stS'Wouletbe 5541' I'... Wth.W • f•..week..i angattrtJsim,fw'e�ecoia torn ..o have been Ny'4�.1.�,'!?'�•:��E�,.A� s 538.5 r. �� 0 1 ..il=��„'•', . the quality of .. River water."if ,are y ?g tet itld>'^1 tboae "'Ile Oa' . ;;-5,1 ' ing what is sew itka6k'solptiOn a fab.the Wi ! '-,, skiver intiOe'moil ..'t�' vale!10 IS: '(1�' i ', j ;.1: '7 .l 1 the prisgn siting issue, and not to • most watersheds in the nation,but in Dioxins.have•been uglily tested for by the .. Obviously:the rdtd5fld'sjratein*gum .-antro' ,dumbing to heavy partisan press) impeded .. terms of water.quality,according to'the Environ- USGS,and levels of total dioxins were higher in nominally highet•in cost.In addidolii It would ' •to ignore it. His actions have c 'mental Protection Agency(BPA),the Middle .: the,Bull,Run••W•atershed than in the Willamette .leave Wilsonville at the mercy of the Portland ' taibly put him in a better positior Willamette River(the stretch from Salem to Ore- • River.. Water Bureau,versus deterrniniiig its own.destiny' '.:.further a final resolution of this t gon City)is in relatively good shape"The article Even Portland water system(representatives) with the Willamette treatment plant. •. ficult issue. also addressed canoe s reladve to carat,en,- ' ,concede the Willamette River,with a planned Mt,Leary needs to apply`bda.d losing parigraph,..' i.,Sen'Miller's experience and II �' docrine disrupters,dioxin,and the' ,.•.,!',.644i,...!.!, •'treatment plant,' •,we'the relative to the farmer's Will 011ie Oil.:''!'�`'�e:4111ativrleadersld are also odd' t 1reablu Our child) oro in. .._.. ' . 1 .:: . 7 '+ '.Oji,Eyed••i, •analyslf Of(l a water ItzN�`s. *ritUr+ ::. r. ho r e7 m� i �••,ti'• iS��' � ����,-,i*,;',-." �'t•,�' �? 1': �.�+ '��' '''''';'''';;Y;;11..4. '''''4. •-°ea"• � ;•i'' +-� � h�� ��'Bttettd' aC�00I ne.Xt�. .-1water Jr' •.ht 1 ..�� i i ,': t! • 7 •. ills r ,' ' • T' ... k i. • Dam.......J..t_where dile prison v system(Which is really$b DI' !- ,.1...: ti 4• _'Y •y. `.Y built.i M I "' 26 percent of Columbia River'well'field' t. - "' •'...!." •• " • 'Ostia'10^inillten�galtons per Jack D. Rayborn•is a.Wilsonville.hesute r. . . be built if no'legislanve solutior :., • .. reached.— continue•.to be at ti ■ • With the days of'the 1999 legis LWilsonville shout ► riot be e session ticking away, S Point. Miller is in a unique position 4 .a ..'4''..-•';:s7:. • '''`0 x. ''' "•••..`.' Of View • •• convince his''legislative colleag F;) kerr'. : 1Ar�: der-: that a partisan standoff over I e� �h/ial'• {=' urid• �r; ...:: .�. .:��� :�.� �.. 1 gu_Lily)is its teiati eiy gaol shape. 1 h anode L:. :11 i w..,,=w .Valet Sybil-ill klepils4.uwuKb) will the rvuiwtwstic uealnlenl plain. MAUIL�JUC. –..– also addressed concerns relative to cancer,en- concede the Willamette River,with a planned Mt Leaiy needs to apply his closing paragraph • Sen.Miller's experience a M docrine disrupters,dioxin,and the treatment plant : Wilsonville treatment plant,'will produce the relative to the farmer's prize buil to his own islative leadership are also o to this final resolution.Our c o tirethodot in succeedingto the safest ., safest drinking water,in the entire region,even • analysis of the water picture:pure bull. ogy �'O�• .to attend school ne tQ water in the region—better than the Noland • . . ' 'thin the Pottland system.. . system(which is really a blend of ltpl itnkrely'. Finally,cot*.iid'timing:The Wilsonville Dammasch—where the pris 26 percent of Columbia Rivett well field stet fieritinent.piadt'Wilt deliver 10 inillion'gallons per ' Jack D.Rayborn is a Wilsonville resident be built if no legislative soli reached -- continue to be o9Wilsonville should riot ire Mil l session ticking away POInt Miller is in a unique posi • Of view convince his' legislative colt r that a partisan standoffov subjected, to• ri. ver e:water . prison siting issue forces, fault, the worst possible ou Fred Why,why,wby,are our mayor and city staff minimum federal drinking water standards is Blr and some membet'ot`the'council:SO•t nithidmtd :diikely but pot nec essakily in the best in- gess Whe to serving us Wrlsonyille'tesidents.a nice emit• •7.1iLt+ests of us.citizefs,aibo will.liave to'be around., • • ' drink of'recycled WzIi metre Rtvet,swNtr e"•as ,-,`and•"drink for stzlW'for years'to comer•:..:: (" • M Oh,bull Your majesty! • • President Bill .CNtItO� our sous=e of drinking Jr ::. ..;.•• _.". ..i bl+atd'-���+ ? • �_• .r bn tlie'-btlier sitle'bf this cot(S�:is'the#'aix�the . The reason our goal mayor aitd:Citi< iais ,'.f Btill.Rpn water optioid doestitt`tieally babe an ad- •. .You.and.your faith followers must not have •White House, 1600 Pen am so.stron 1 su ve of the.Willamette River., •vtraveled outside of Wilsonvi1Wvea'much.The ' Ave.,Wash' D.C.205 8 Y PPmu orate,since no one Portland's tos make a lot that claim that recycled Willamette River sewage will ' •Vine President Al Gore, option is relatively simple and has nothing to do money.The city of Portland s position is the with water quality or scientific'details.Their sup-• supply is available through.cooperation.But since exceed the'quality of water you can get in Salem, , tive ofrce Building, Was OregonCity,Gresham all Metro-area port is driven by two factors. there is no huge profit involved,Portland officials Stayton, D.C.20500. .. " towns,Forest Grove,McMinnville and the other One of these is. jtttluence and persuasion. �' .ann t sitting In the city offices�acb;day to pro-, .•GOY.JOM Kitratebet',25 • • • towns that to into gull Rttn•or the streams of the '. ' The likely cost of a cotitpkte¢Willamette River mote it. ° . p • . •Capitol.. Building Saler ` . coastal and Cascade range is ludicrous.The water ' water treatment plant is ardtnd$30 million:Al- ..A second factor is that building a high-tech 97310 (503)3783111. though Montgomery Watson has not disclosed its water treatment plant with a plaque that has their supplies of these Cities closely resemble high- . • .. U.S:. Sen. Gordon Sm fee,I am informed the pr nf'fee fop ep , names'on it would be a" achievement" quality;filed drinking water.That's what we, t E" 8 can achieve with a tie to the Bell Run supply. Ore.), United States Deering services on a"tiriitkey basis"for jobs of • fix ode city officials:The alternative of a partner- the solution to our Water problems is Washington, D.C., 2051' this magnitude is about 22 percent.Simple arith= , ship with the city of Portland that delivers clear ` t' have a fresh intee;city staff give the challenge a ( ) 224-3753. In On�goi . metic will indicate that the consulting firm would Bull Run water to our citizens runs a serious risk fresh new r look.It is leas that giprve the pea- Greer 224-3753.) Ore reap a total fee of about S6 Million(that's six • for our;local city officials since they night lose fleshsonales'ire���to ire en pd Suite 618,Wyatt • million!dollars,folks.),which provides a strong•� {control and recognition.This is an unthinkable Willamette River stwal6e.option and feel they' • ; • Third, Ptxtlarxl, OR 9720 122 • Motivation for the company to cultivate Its.te1a�;.'; pbssibility.ft*most'politicians even if your cid- dons with our city officials and to.promote the" ..a have ta'think recycled sewage.Worse yet, •: "mow what it best for us citizens."They are on.a' • 3388. designYcityprojectPipe collision course with a resounding`oto"vote ': •U.S..Sen. merits of its to our maim staff aril ,most of the uyaild,be buried n said ��� others—which the corntlany likely does ori•a i ' valves;acid there isn't any place to display a ' • when it comes to financing a Willamette Riva ' 259 Russell Building,Wall water treatment taint. • daily basis. plaque with their names on it. P • D.C. 20510; phone (20< There is nothing wrong or unethical about this Finally,I question the following statement that Pediaps that is the only way to get back to the 5244. approach.Selling city bgicials on having • ' '..aplieaied in the city propaganda rag celled'The:, pursuit of a sensible solution.to our water rob- • U.S. Rep. Darlene Hoc • ;' Wilsonville residents drink to Cycled sewage from •Boozes Periy Messenger"dated March 1999: ' kms. - . . •• • '' Ore.;51h District),1419 LAI c the Willamette Riva is just good business,and . "The system(the Willamette river plant proposed '• . , : House. of Representative! .-, getting the mayor and city staff on their side is • by Montgomery.Watson)—it will the. P ing, Washington,. D.C., a:iintelligent.Their claim that they can meet the safest,highest-quality drinking water in the re- Fred J. Burgess is a Wilsonville reiant. Publishe r, it t:Y.. i =� r• STAFF . okei ear L..:. ,. 4 .•. I 1 • , . • ,: . WNSt�tt t •o fib C4sei T.°171. Moller tle2a , • ' • Editor Barb=Sherman Associate Editor (503) Your COi'7 munity, General Mana�oer tart Klpp ' - 'Reporter • a... �r w. w�►_�_� l'or'e • WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON MAR 2 4 1999 March 19, 1999 Tigard Water District 13125 Sw Hall Blvd Tigard Or 97223 Enclosed you will find a copy of the Abstract of Votes for Tigard Water District Commissioner Positions#3, #4, and#5 relating to the Vote by mail election held on March 9, 1999. In accordance with ORS 255.295, please canvass the votes and notify the Washington County Elections Division within thirty (30) days of receipt by signing and returning the bottom portion of this letter to: Washington County Elections Division 150 N 1st Avenue, MS 3 Hillsboro OR 97124 Thank you very much. Sincerely, 34•KV\A V6-1 Ginny Kingsley Elections Manager GK/jd • Page 12 MARCH 1999 SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION Date 03/16/99 DABC01 MARCH 9, 1999 Time 12:25:16 SUMMARY REPORT WASHINGTON FIRE 2 DIR 5 (#/PCT 24) RIVERGROVE WATER POS 2 (#/PCT 3) TIGARD WATER COMM POS 5 (#/PCT 8) WOLSBORN FARM WATER P-1 (#/PCT 1) . (#/RPT 24) (#/RPT 3) (#/RPT 8) (#/RPT 1) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0); (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) , I GARY WELLS 1357 100.0 SHERRY PATTERSON 3 100.0' BEVERLY J FROUDE 933 100.0; NO CANDIDATE FILED 0 0.0, Blank voted (ballots) 595 30.4 Blank voted (ballots) 2 40.0 Blank voted (ballots) 423 31.1 Blank voted (ballots) - 13 100.01 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 RALEIGH WATER COMM POS 1 (#/PCT 5) RIVERGROVE WATER POS 3 (#/PCT 3) WEST SLOPE WATER POS 1 (#/PCT 13) WOLSBORN FARM WATER P-2 (#/PCT 1); (#/RPT 5) (#/RPT 3) (#/RPT 13) (#/RPT 1) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) BABETTE HORENSTEIN 343 100.0 JOSEPH J MAROVICH SR 3 100.0 ARTHUR K HOLMEN 810 100.0' NO CANDIDATE FILED 0 0.0: Blank voted (ballots) 196 36.3 Blank voted (ballots) 2 40.0 Blank voted (ballots) 573 41.4 Blank voted (ballots) 13 100.0' Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0• Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 RALEIGH WATER COMM POS 2 (#/PCT 5) RIVERGROVE WATER POS 4 (#/PCT 3) WEST SLOPE WATER POS 2 (#/PCT 13) WOLSBORN FARM WATER P-5 (#/PCT 1) ; (#/RPT 5) (#/RPT 3) (#/RPT 13) (#/RPT 1) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (X/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) JOHN A HIRSCHY 322 100.0 PETER R PEREZ 3 100.0 A P DI BENEDETTO 786 100.0 NO CANDIDATE FILED 0 0.0: Blank voted (ballots) 217 40.2 Blank voted (ballots) 2 40.0' Blank voted (ballots) 597 43.1 Blank voted (ballots) 13 100.0' Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 RALEIGH WATER COMM POS 4 (#/PCT 5) TIGARD WATER COMM POS 3 (#/PCT 8) TV WATER COMM POS 4 (#/PCT 112)• TUALATIN HILLS P&R POS 4 (#/PCT 125) (#/RPT 5) (#/RPT 8) (#/RPT 112) (#/RPT 125) (No. to vote for 1) (X/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) M BURKE RICE 317 100.0 NORMAN R PENNER 913 100.0 THOMAS E JACKMAN 4242 40.9 JOHN GRIFFITHS 10214 78.9 RICHARD P BURKE 6105 59.0 GERALD E WESTERSUND 2721 21.0 Blank voted (ballots) 222 41.1 Blank voted (ballots) 443 32.6 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Blank voted (ballots) 2664 20.4 Blank voted (ballots) 3220 19.8 Over voted (ballots) 44 0.3 Over voted (ballots) 42 0.2 RIVERGROVE WATER POS 1 (#/PCT 3) TIGARD WATER COMM POS 4 (#/PCT 8) (#/RPT 3) (#/RPT 8) TV WATER COMM POS 5 (#/PCT 112). TUALATIN HILLS P&R POS 5 (#/PCT 125) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (X/RP 100.0) (#/RPT 112) (#/RPT 125) (No. to vote for 1) (X/RP 100.0) (No. to vote for 1) (%/RP 100.0) JOHN J KLEIN 3 100.0 NO CANDIDATE FILED 3 100.0 JIM DOANE 8346 100.0 TERRY MOORE 10416 100.0 Blank voted (ballots) 2 40.0 Blank voted (ballots) 1353 99.7 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Blank voted (ballots) 4709 36.0 Blank voted (ballots) 5781 35.6 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 Over voted (ballots) 0 0.0 **' OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF VOTES FOR THE sPtCiAL UiSiRii.i tLaI ION ON MARCH Y, 1999 **_* TIGARD W4TER COMMISSIONER - POSITION 3 gage Number 242.U01.001 R T I I N • - . E U U 1 0 G R R G R I N N A M S 0 0 R A I U U D N E I I R W R E P A D E T P R E E V C R N 0 E N T N CE E T OR R A M S G M E P 0 S 3 28 FOWLER MID SCHOOL 6 16 2 . 124 I I j ' 309 CHll RIST KING LUTH 91 t0 7 24.bY 104 1038 KING CITY CROWN CTR 63g 8m 13.9N _ 441 I I I I 1 b43 ROYAL VILLA REC 47 1121 23.72 831 I I I 65 DEER CREEK ELEM SCH 804 2131 26.52 9g I I I 193 SW BIBLE CHURCH 12441 1391 11.1Z921 I I I 9 DEER CREEK ELEM SCH 1124 18551I 16.4Z 1151 I 40 ELDORADO VILLA 115 3451 29.9721 2611 I I I I I I 1 *** T 0 T A L S **** I 70251 145g 20.6Z 91 I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I i I I 1 I 1 I - I I ---- I II I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I _ ._ �. ` __ I I I I I I II J.}, t E I v I I I I I I I ._ I- I . I I I I I I f I I I I I 1 I_ I I_ . I I I ; I I I I I I I I I - 4->. -b:F--a- l- ,:` Iet. - ,. gymI _ ... ---..I... _ _ . .. .- .. . , _ . . .. urfiCIAL STATEMENT OF VUiiy Fok THE SPECIAL DISTRICT ELEi;IION ON MARCH 9, 1999 **** TIGARD WATER COMMISSIONER - POSITION 4 • Page Number 243.661.UU1 R I T I N E U U 1 0 G R R G I N N A C S 0 0 R A T U U D N E T T D R W I E P A D D E T A R E T ✓ C R E O E T N C F E 7 0 I R A M L 5 G M E E D P 0 S 4 309 CHRIST KING LUTH I 91ST__ 264 21.9 - - P28 FOWLER MID SCHOOL J 6771 1671 24.67 q 1 I I ) I I I 1 38 KING CITY CROWN CTR 634 891 13.91 3 ROYAL VILLA REC 47 11 _23.7 - I__ I ' 1165 DEER CREEK ELEM SCH J 80 21426.59 193 SW BIBLE CHURCH I 124 13 11.1 q ( I I 39 DEER CREEK ELEM SCH 112 184 16.41 q I V40 ELDORADO VILLA 11531 344 29.94 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I *** T 0 T A L S **** J 70251 145q 20.67 I 3 I I I ! I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I • I II I I II I l f $ I I I I > > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! ! I I f I I I I I I I I I • ,._ i. . . **** OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF VUita tort iiia SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION ON Ihwru.a Y, 99v9 **** TIGARD WATER COMMISSIONER - POSITION 5 . >age Number 244_001.UO1 E U U I B G R R G V I N N A E S 0 0 R R T U U D L E T T Y R W E P A J D E T R E F ✓ C R R O E 0 I N C U E T 0 D R A M E S G M E P 0 . S 5 009 CHRIST KING LUTH 913 20 21. 134 I I I ( I I 028 FOWLER MID SCHOOL 67i 16 24.6 1131 I I D38 KING CITY CROWN CTR 63_ 8. 13.__ 441 I L- I I I I I 343 ROYAL VILLA REC 47 11 23. 851 - 165 DEER CREEK ELEM SCH 80 21 26.5_ 9 193 SW BIBLE CHURCH 124 13 11.1 9 239 DEER CREEK ELEM SCH 112 18 16.4_ 10 .40 ELDORADO VILLA 115 34 29. 25NI 1 I I **** T 0 T A L S **** 7025 145 20.6. 93 I I I I I I I I I I I i I i I I I i I I I I i r I I � I I I I I i i I I I 1 I I I I 1 i I I I I I �, :\ I (1,,,..!-A ' I �II, t.I I _r 1,.-„. • -. _,.. . - .,,•_ .. ._ . 'r 1 1 ..,.r` - - --...-.,,, . I ...... . .... .. . .,i . ....I �' - . . . 1 _. . . -- WRITE-IN TALLY TIGARD WATER DISTRICT MARCH 9, 1999 COMMISSIONER- POS. #4 .:.... ..... GEORGE RHINE 2 BRUCE STOBBE 2 JOSEPH A. CURRAN 2 GERRY MCREYNOLDS 2 LISA CACH 2 MISCELLANEOUS 7 !✓ i III Bureau of Water Works BULL Cross Training Work at Mt. Tabor RUNCh 411,,tf k:—... ,~.- - a•Xt7s1...... 1., -,..„,k6. : tt: v x F err .:":27-.....,,,...,_ .. q'µ w _ T ' , :l.?:'1,:.:7i f:14g44;0;4:-' ti P, A:' 1. -4,,7,),A:- ..'.`' 14,070 i it i 1 ,' ' + ,I' .`, .. April 22, 1999 held and demonstrated is stronger among employees r�t�,�rilliThrird .,� C themselves than among the organization per se. In short, rA /Iiia {rrr ; _ ii n "ALIGNMENT" the problem to be solved is the lack of alignment between ''r1„ A IS FOR ALIGNMENT - s r - Iti the organization's goals and values,etc and their fi I Apologies to alphabet-obsessed author Sue Grafton, implementation or demonstration. ' .71i. � rn -- creator of Kinsey Millhone. (By the way,and this might r r� ' !I/U/til �" illi ilia _ 4 - yougetInterestingly enough,that is exactlyone of the issues the 'ililj = be the best information from this column,"Nis for g y g j/!I/j - Management Team and Managers Groupare currently Nrniiii/i jjj o a Noose"is available in bookstores in paperback now,and g g y '(% i j . Min . "0 is for Outlaw"will be available in hardback in grappling with. The terminology is a little different,but I A think the content and subject matter are the same or veryTim Kading, Operating Engineer, worked at Mt. Tabor October.) D' r••• last week to install an adapter on a 32"pipe from similar. We are using terms like"vision","strategic plan" Reservoir 1. The adapter is part of the installation of a Anyway,I want to write about alignment,which is a and"business plan",but the issue strikes me as one of sonic meter to obtain flow measurement from critical category for organization change. The timing for a aligning people at all levels of our Bureau in a way that we Reservoir 1. The job was a big one-involving valves column on this subject is coincident with a couple of things all know where we are going(and what we stand for)and and pipes that are more than 100 years old,a small going on in the Bureau. One is the work beingdone with confined space, and bulky fittings. (One fitting which g g how we intend to get there. The connections among weighed 1,000 pounds was only 1/2"narrower than the Management Team and the Managers Group relative vision,strategy and operations have to be made. the doorway to the vault). to strategic/business/operational planning. The other is the work the Portland Water Bureau is doing with 20 other We will be talking a lot more in the Bureau about these In recent months,Apprentice Water Service and other critical issues relative to organization change,but Mechanics(AWSM)and Water Service Mechanics utilities in an AWWARF(American Water Works g (WSM)who have been through the apprentice Personnel Changes Association Research Foundation)research project on first I want to make a note about a somewhat broader program within the last five years have participated in organization change. issue of alignment. I am writing this column of Friday, "cross training"with other Bureau work groups. The Randy Albright,new hire,Environmental Specialist April 16,after spending part of the morning at the 7th goal of working along side members of other groups William Brown,promotion,Lead Operating Engineer Alignment relates to shared organization goals,values, annual BEST awards breakfast(which we help sponsor to is to provide the WSMs and apprentices with a better Marcia Campbell,promotion,Administrative principles,mission and vision. One of the things we have promote sustainable practices,like water conservation, understanding of how the Bureau's work gets done Supervisor I P heard from Managers,and plenty of other employees in among the City's business community). The keynote and improve communication between groups. Early Gary Egan,new hire,Technician H the Bureau,is that not everyone is clear on all of these speaker,Steve Curwood of NPR's Living on Earth made this year AWSMs and WSMs worked with the Paul Ejgird,new hire,Surveyor H Engineering Services group for eight days. This Jg ythings. Furthermore,while most employees may a point relative to alignment that was somewhat more month they spent three days working beside Kathryn Grimm,temporary appointment,Customer understand and intellectually"get"our corporate goals, cosmic than what I have talked about so far. His point is employees in Water Resources Management.Soon Account Specialist I values,etc.,they are not clear on how what they do day in that being in touch with nature is an essential part of being they will work with Operating Engineers, water Carrie Hughes,promotion,Customer Acccount and day out fits into those goals,etc. human. treatment,Sandy River Station,and Customer Service Specialist II staff. JoAnn Nelson,new hire,Information Systems Analyst II A related issue is the extent to which employees know the Some things to think about on Earth Day,and as we Above: Willy Doran(WSM)and Jim Preble(Water Daphea Pen,transfer from BES,Application Analyst II organization's goals,etc,but personally feel that the way continue trying to make the Bureau the place we know it Quality Inspector)discuss the installation of a Eric Rathbun,promotion,Engineer trainee the organization works(and what it does)is not always can be. backflow device during a preliminary inspection at a Richard Seright,promotion,Senior Engineer Associate consistent with them. A subset of that finding that the /�,, onstruction site. research shows,is there is oftentimes the feeling in the / '' `Utl-0ii fri..„1„.„ workforce that,while the organization has clear and well Michael Rosenberger known goals,values,etc.,the strength with which they are Administrator .c.,,..,.,-,..;• City of Portland ® Have an idea for Dispatch? Bureau of Water Works ;4-4,, i#_`; 1 120 SW Fifth.Room 600 Call 823 7510. , e Portland,Oregon 97204 Please '__ ' >.' Erik Sten.Commissioner rec_�cle! Water Bureau Web Site: City of Portland II Bureau of Water Works IN1 120 SW Fifth,Room 600 • Portland,Oregon 97204 !!1.--*.� Michael F. Rosenberger.Administrator http://wwa.wateccl.portland.otas Erik Sten.Commissioner ■ Michael F.Rosenberger.Administrator t 1999 Water BEST: Crown Cork and Seal Co., Inc. Lead Summit, April 6, 1999 Annual Consumption: ` • " 1,800,000 - 1992: 3,458,004 1,600,000 - 1993: 5,535,200 1994: 7,980,412 1995: 8,052,968F. 1,400,000 1996: 9,751,676 ys 1997: 14,014,464 Edwards Rosenberger _ ]data '` " Seierstad Casson h 1998: 6,657,948 'z " O 1,200,000 --- � 73 i The Water Bureau sponsored a second Lead Summit on community exposure to lead. Stacey 0Edwards,outreach 1,000,000 - and public education coordinator for the Bureau's Lead Hazard Reduction Program,co-facilitated. Mike E Rosenberger provided an overview of the Bureau's projects to reduce community exposure to lead and related O• 800,000 public involvement.Along with community and health professionals, Curt Ireland, Bert Seierstad(Lead Hazard Reduction Program Manager),and Kathy Casson attended,representing the Water Resources Management group. L te+ a 600,000 3 Residential Irrigation The Cities of Gresham,Hillsboro,and Tigard and the Tualatin Valley Water District will survey an additional aoo,000 This spring the Water Bureau is expanding its successful 200 residential landscapes.Participating water utilities pilot program of the last two years to provide free are evaluating the program's ability to manage peak 200,000 landscape surveys to residential customers to reduce season use,an important regional conservation goal. o , . _. _ w , a outdoor watering.Over 500 participants throughout the Cl Cl Cl m M M 0. 0' 0 4."' 0' 0 a, r- � C' 0' Co 0' metropolitan area's pilot program have rated the Water: A Cash Crop? o r o program highly—and used an average of 19%less Along the southern coastline of India,farmers who once Period water than neighbors who did not participate.Since grew rice in their fields are now making more money Billingwater use often doubles in the summer due to garden selling water from thei.61 0u..4 water supplies and Crown Cork&Seal Company's Portland facility won Crown Cork&Seal also investigated replacing water- and turf imgation,these outdoor water savings reduce underground reservoirs to Kanyakumari,a coastal city a 1999 BEST(Businesses for an Environmentally cooled,-4,.:1,........t with used air-cooled models. This peak consumption and lower water bills. which is one of India's most popular tourist destinations. Sustainable Tomorrow)award for..,1k..,:..b water use eliminated the use of single pass cooling water at the Homes which used more than 60 units(45,000 gallons) Pipelines from farms lead directly to crammed hotels. by 8.5 million gallons annually in 1998.The Water plant— for water and sewer savings of$48,000 per of water for both of the last two summer quarters are Bureau,BES,Transportation and the City's Energy year.In October 1998,the company made the the target audience. Letters have gone out this month Regional planners in southern India suggest that the Office and other community organizations sponsor the replacements. inviting homeowners to participate in a free landscape water sales are a poor solution to a water crisis.The BEST awards to recognize outstanding achi , ,...�..,.0 inwater table is dropping.Little has been done to capture Capital costs for Crown Cork's water conservation survey.This year's program will serve 550 Portland rainwater falling in the region and store it in reservoirs. the business community in conservation,water and households on a first-come,first-served basis. After energywaste reduction,and clean and efficient work came to$12,000— a simple payback of three Despite millions of dollars spent to build 24 desalination months.This project eliminated all water use for the 1 /z hour survey,homeowners receive an analysis of plants,only one is currently functional.The rest are out transportation. the survey information which includes optimal watering manufacturing processes in the facility. of order because government employees failed to schedules for the homeowner's lawns and gardens.In The Water Bureau's BIG(Business,Industry, maintain them—according to a water.,,,..:>.,.Y .tion Crown Cork and Seal is the world's largest some cases,where the surveyor recommends it,a Government)water conservation r. b.G��,provided spokesperson in the region.New federal programs are ...d�.-1L„t .�r of tin cans and bottle caps.Throughout licensed landscape contractor will install a rain sensor or technical assistance to Crown Cork and Seal in early working to install filtration systems and build new 1998.First the BIG program analyzed the company's operations in 282 plants in 59 countries,there is a strong irrigation time clock. reservoirs to tap rainwater.In some communities commitment to sustainability—from recycling aluminum annual use of approximately 14 million gallons of water The surveyors are participants in horticulture programs citizens are taking up shovels to create new tanks and in in 1997.Immediately the company began to closely production of new cans to recycling packaging monitor water flow through control valves and materials. Lightweighting r.,, ,......5 have reduced the at Mt.Hood and Portland Community Colleges or reservoirs and clear old canals themselves.Southern g Oregon State University's Master Gardener Extension India is dotted with catchment tanks and reservoirs that thickness of metal used to manufacture containers to 8th discovered some that were not operating TheIndian rulers built in the 7thand centuries.Some P g Pro .They will provide a strong knowledge of plant company replaced the flow control valves. save energy and.��.�u.���.Pollution prevention is anplanners hope those systems might be used again. P Y p important corporate goal. selection and customer-oriented focus to the v.�,g.Gall. Source:U.S. Water News Online,April, 1999 I TIGARD WATER DISTRICT INCOME STATEMENT & BALANCE SHEET As of March 31, 1999 INCOME STATEMENT Accounts I ' FY BUDGET I I Prior Y -T- D I I Monthly I I Y-T- D I REVENUES 1% PY Water Sales Revenue 9,300.00 8,889.09 8,889.09 Interest Earned 1,500.00 1,523.57 198.38 1,721.95 Recovered Expenditures 0.00 0.00 Total Revenues 10,800.00 10,412.66 198.38 10,611.04 EXPENDITURES Professional Services 3,580.00 162.00 162.00 Contractual Services 5,000.00 210.00 80.50 290.50 Special Department Expenses 1,300.00 0.00 0.00 Office Supplies & Expenses 0.00 0.00 0.00 Advertising & Elections 4,300.00 0.00 882.00 882.00 Dues & Subscriptions 1,010.00 476.00 476.00 Travel Food & Lodging 650.00 0.00 0.00 Education & Training 400.00 0.00 0.00 Insurance 2,000.00 1,582.00 1,582.00 Contingency/Reserve 2,700.00 0.00 0.00 Total Expenditures 20,940.00 2,430.00 962.50 3,392.50 BALANCE SHEET ASSETS Cash & Investments 0.00 46,684.66 (764.12) 45,920.54 Net Fixed Assets 0.00 0.00 Total Assets 0.00 46,684.66 . (764.12) 45,920.54 LIABILITIES & FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts Payable 0.00 0.00 Due Other Funds 0.00 0.00 Total Liabilities 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fund Balance Fund Balance 35,000.00 38,702.00 0.00 _ 38,702.00 Excess of Revenues/(Expenditures) (35,000.00) 7,982.66 (764.12) 7,218.54 Total Fund Balance 0.00 46,684.66 (764.12) 45,920.54 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance 0.00 46,684.66 (764.12) 45,920.54 g:\Excel\TWD\Monthly\94-5isbsals --///7 ?/ /zi?7 /2 6cc?/ 24/b/ 3 VD(,vry 01-›-wvg 171-Sic" 04-22-1999 09:58AM FROM TO 6841437 P.01 0° .�,i C • <•urn re: Water-Motions for City Council Meeting of April 27, 1999 BAG 4,,19 ATTOR1 kT LAW 1 727 N.W.fioyt Street Portland,Oregon 97209 . • 222.4402 Fax:(503)243-2944_ � MEMORANDUM � • Post-it.Fax Note 7671 Dal AYA2. I h 2- Telle . ' Co/DeptGo.' Phone#Cgy)_ (O 3 1 Phone l � 7...,4"ie 7/• Fax# an /13 Fax A / a 1�� /�7 • TO: Ed Wegner,Public Works Director FROM: James M. Coleman, City Attorney's Office DATE: April 20, 1999 RE: Water-Motions for City Council Meeting of April 27, 1999 Following are motions to be used by the City Council at their April 27, 1999 meeting on water. Motion 1: r move that the City Council direct the City. Manag er take the actions necessary to prepare for delivery to the Willamette Water Supply Agency a "Proposal to Construct", as defined by Section 5.1 of the agency in ergovernmental agreement, for a Willamette River water supplysystem, based upon the report and recommendation of Murray Smith & Associaes , The Willamette River Water Supply System Preliminary Engineering Report, dated December 1998. Councilor Hunt, the City WWSA member, shall convey at the time of delivery of the Proposal a commitment of the City to carry out all of the implementation tasks necessary t out the Proposal, to include but not be limited to property acquisition, contr cling or design and co struction services, financing, and execution of future gov ce documents, this c mmitment being subject to receivingthe necessary concurrence of the members of Intergovernmental Water Board. Te actions directed by this motion are taken by e Council in order to carry out and implement the authority to provide and m age the City's water supply system found in TMC 12.10 and ORS chapter 225 and to fulfill the obligeDn to supply highquality water at low cost to the:members of . the IWB that the City assumed through the IWB intergovernmental agreements. Motion 2 (Adopt only if Motion i is approved): I move that Councilor Hunt is directed to deliver notification to the IWB of the previous Council action to direct preparation of the Proposal to Construct the Willamette River water :_upply system, and to request that the IWB members grant their approval to the City, ioursuant to the terms of the IWB intergovernmental agreements, to carry out he tapital improvement program and enter long-term water / supply contracts necessary to carry out the project. Councilor Hunt is further directed to inform the WWSA when those approvals are received,,hereby. eliminating the contingency of the previous motion. Motion 3 (Adopt only if Motion 1 fails): , / /