Loading...
DDR2019-00004 APPROVED DDR2O 19 - 00004 SLR2O 19- 00002 SECOND LEVEL OF 12559 SW MAIN STREET NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW DDR2019-00004 , SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR2019-00002 SECOND LEVEL OF 12559 SW MAIN STREET T I GARD 120 DAYS = December 19th, 2019 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SECOND LEVEL OF 12559 SW MAIN STREET CASE NO.: Downtown Design Review(DDR) DDR2019-00004 Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) SLR2019-00002 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing a second level to the building at 12259 SW Main Street, which adds windows to the street facing facade and increases the height of the building by less than 20 percent. The property is partially located within both the FEMA 100 year floodplain and steep slopes. No changes to the building footprint are proposed. APPLICANT: Eric (Yu) Xu 10755 SW Naeve Street Tigard, OR 97224 OWNER: Xu,Yu Han,Ziye 10755 SW Naeve Street Tigard, OR 97224 LOCATION: 12559 SW Main Street;WCTM 2S102AD Tax Lot 00800 ZONING DESIGNATION: MU-CBD: Mixed-Use Central Business District zone. The MU-CBD zone is designed to provide a pedestrian-friendly urban village in downtown Tigard. A wide variety of commercial, civic, employment, mixed-use, apartments, and rowhouses are allowed. SUB-AREA: Main Street-Center Street APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.510 and 18.650 DDR2019-00004&SLR2019-00002.SECOND LEVEL OF 12559 SW MAIN STREET 1 of SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request.The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information: The subject property is located at 12559 SW Main Street (WCTM 2S102AC, Tax Lot 00800). Which is located southeast of OR 99W, north and northwest of SW Main Street, and southwest of Fanno Creek. The .22 acre site contains one 8,376 square foot building, a segment of the Fano Creek Regional Trail, Goal 5 Significant Habitat Areas,a CWS Vegetated Corridor,and steep slopes. This site is located within the FEMA 100 year floodplain and also located in the Main Street- Center Street subarea of the Mixed- Use Commercial Business District (MU-CBD) zone. A map from FEMA shows that the base flood elevation for this area is 155 feet above sea level. Proposal: The applicant is proposing to create a second floor on the southwest portion of the building,which is farthest away from Fanno Creek. The portion of the building where work will take place is partially located within the FEMA 100 year floodplain. The improvements will all take place at approximately 170 feet above sea level, which is above the base flood elevation identified from the FEMA website. No grading changes are proposed for this project. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Staff has reviewed the proposal for consistency with the applicable criteria in the following Community Development Code (CDC) chapters. Findings for only the applicable code sections are found below: 18.510. Sensitive Lands 18.650. Tigard Downtown Plan District 18.510 Sensitive Lands 18.510.020 Applicability E. Administrative sensitive lands review. 1. Administrative sensitive lands reviews within the special flood hazard area (excluding the floodway), drainageway, slopes that are 25 percent or greater, and unstable ground are processed through a Type I procedure,as provided in Section 18.710.050,for the following actions: a. The repair, reconstruction, or improvement of an existing structure or utility, the cost of which is less than 50 percent of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction. The applicant is proposing to improve an existing structure that is located within the FEMA 100 year flood plain and slopes that are 25 percent or greater. No grading changes or changes to the building DDR2019-00004&SLR2019-00002.SECOND LEVEL OF 12559 SW MAIN STREET 2 of 7 footprint are proposed. According to tax information from Washington County, the total market value of the structure prior to the improvement is $494,740. The total valuation of the proposed work is $100,000, therefore the improvements are less than 50 percent of the building market value. Therefore, the proposal is a Type I Sensitive Lands Review (SLR). 18.510.040 General Provisions for Special Flood Hazard Areas E. Resistant to flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes, must be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. As shown in the applicant's submittal, the proposed construction is resistant to flood damage because the applicant is constructing a second floor on an existing building. The second floor is well above the flood level. This criterion is met. F. Minimize flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes,must be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. As shown in the applicant's submittal,the proposed development can be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage because the applicant is constructing a second floor on an existing building. The second floor is well above the flood level and would not be damaged in a flood. This criterion is met. G. Equipment protection. Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air-conditioning equipment and other service facilities must be designed or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. As stated in the applicant's narrative, the applicant will build facilities according to code criteria that will ensure that electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air-conditioning equipment and other service facilities will be designed,elevated,or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. This criterion is met. I. Anchoring. All new construction, all manufactured homes and substantial improvements must be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure. As shown in the applicant's submittal, the proposed development is a second floor on an existing building. The second floor is well above the flood level and would not be subject to flotation, collapse, or lateral movement in a flood event. This criterion is met. M. Nonresidential construction. New construction and substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other nonresidential structure must either have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to the level of the base flood elevation, or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, must: 1. Be floodproofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water; The applicant is not proposing any work to the existing first floor of the structure. The applicant states that the first floor is at or above 157 feet above sea level, and that the area of work is at approximately DDR2019-00004&SLR2019-00002.SECOND LEVEL OF 12559 SW MAIN STREET 3 of 7 170 feet above sea level.The base flood level at this location is at approximately 155 feet above sea level. This criterion is met. 3. Be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the design and methods of construction are in compliance with accepted standards of practice for meeting provisions of this subsection based on their development or review of the structural design, specifications and plans. Such certifications must be provided to the building official as provided in Paragraph_18.510.030.E.2; and As stated in the applicant's narrative, the structural components will meet building code criteria. This criterion is met. 18.650 Tigard Downtown Plan District 18.650.020 Applicability A. Applicability. The regulations of this chapter apply to the Tigard Downtown Plan District in addition to all other applicable regulations of this title. The boundaries of the plan district are shown on Map 18.650.A, which is located at the end of this chapter, and on the official zoning map. 2. Pre-existing uses and development. Pre-existing land uses and associated development that were lawfully established prior to the effective date of this chapter are treated as lawful or approved uses and developments, subject to the following: a. Modifications associated with lawfully established pre-existing uses and structures are allowed,provided the modifications meet or move the nonconforming use or structure toward compliance with all applicable standards, except that single detached houses used for residential purposes that were lawfully established prior to the effective date of this chapter are exempt from the design standards of this chapter. The applicant is proposing a modification to a lawfully established pre-existing use and structure on WCTM 2S102AC, Tax Lot 00800, which is located within the Main Street-Center Street subarea of the Tigard Downtown Plan District. Specifically, the applicant is proposing to add a second story to the portion of the building that is located on the southwest corner of the lot. Because the applicant is proposing modifications to an existing development, only the building, site development, and design standards that specifically apply to proposed changes to the site are addressed below. 18.650.030 Approval Process A. Procedures. 1. Type I downtown development review. Downtown development review applications for development or modifications that meet the thresholds of Paragraph 18.650.030.B.1 are processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050, using the approval criteria in Subsection 18.650.040.A. The proposal meets the threshold criteria for a Track 1 design compliance letter. DDR2019-00004&SLR2019-00002.SECOND LEVEL OF 12559 SW MAIN STREET 4 of 7 B. Review Thresholds. If a proposed development or modification is unlisted, the Director will determine the most appropriate review type.This determination is the final local decision and will favor the review type that provides the most appropriate public notice and opportunity for public comment. 1. Type I downtown development review. A Type I downtown development review is required for the following: a. Addition,elimination,or change in location of windows that does not decrease the window coverage on a street-facing facade below the minimum required; g. An increase in the height of a building of less than 20 percent; The applicant is proposing to build a second story to the structure on WCTM 2S102AC,Tax Lot 00800, which will add windows to the street facing facade and increase the height of the building by less than 20 percent. This modification will be reviewed according to the Track 1 Downtown Design Review (DDR) procedures. 18.650.040 Approval Criteria A. Type I downtown development review. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions an application for Type I downtown development review when the following are met: 1. The modification does not cause the development to go out of conformance with any applicable standard of this chapter or further out of conformance if already nonconforming, except where an adjustment has been approved; and The applicant is proposing to build a second story to the structure on WCTM 2S102AC,Tax Lot 00800, which will add windows to the street facing facade and increase the height of the building by less than 20 percent.The applicant's proposal will not cause the existing development to go out of conformance with any applicable standard or further out of conformance. This criterion is met. 2. The modification complies with all other applicable standards of this title. The proposed modification complies with all other applicable standards of this tide as described in the other sections of this staff report. This criterion is met. 18.650.050. Development Standards A. Development Standards. Development standards are provided in Table 18.650.1. Table 18.650.1 Development Standards Standard Sub-Area Main Street MS Pro osal Meets Standard? Buildint Heitht -Minimum 20 ft. 20.83 ft. Yes ReSEEK 80 ft. 20.83 ft. Yes [1] See Subsection 18.650.080.D. DDR2019-00004&SLR2019-00002.SECOND LEVEL OF 12559 SW MAIN STREET 5 of 7 The applicant is proposing a second story to an existing structure within the Main Street subarea of the Tigard Downtown Plan District. No changes are proposed to the height of the first story. The proposal meets all of the applicable standards in Table 18.650.1. This standard is met. 18.650.060 Design Standards A. Create vibrant first stories, streetscapes, and rights-of-way; provide weather protection; and promote safety and security. 2. Standards. c. Windows. Minimum window coverage includes any glazed portions of doors. iii. Upper floor windows for all buildings. (A)The minimum window area of street-facing facades above a first story is 30 percent, except on top stories that include sloped roofs and dormer windows. The existing partial second story of the facade has 0 percent window coverage. The proposed facade change for the second floor will have 29.3 percent window coverage. This increase in the window coverage brings the structure closer to conformance. This standard is met. (B)The minimum ratio of vertical to horizontal dimensions for windows on a street-facing facade above a first story is 1.5:1). The applicant has presented staff an elevation drawing that shows window dimensions for the street facing facade. The windows are 4 feet wide and 6 feet tall,which correlates to a 1.5:1 ratio. This standard is met. iv. Window shadowing for all buildings. Windows must be recessed 3 inches into the facade. Nonresidential and mixed-use buildings may instead incorporate trim of a contrasting material or color. As stated in the applicant's narrative, the applicant will recess the windows 3 inches into the facade. This standard is met. C. Integrated building facade standards. 2. Standards. a. Facades. i. Nonresidential and mixed-use buildings without residential component. Buildings 2 stories and above must have 3 clearly defined elements on the street- facing facade: a base (extends from the sidewalk to the bottom of the second story or the belt course that separates the ground floor from the middle of the building); a middle (distinguished from the top and base of the building by use of building elements); and a top (roof form or element at the uppermost portion of the facade that visually terminates the facade). The applicant is proposing that the new second level facade match the facade of the existing building. The applicant's building elevation drawings show that there will be a base,middle,and top for the building facade. This standard is met. DDR2019-00004&SLR20I9-00002.SECOND LEVEL OF 12559 SW MAIN STREET 6 of 7 b. Roof forms. i. The roof form of a building must follow one(or a combination) of the following forms: (A)Flat roof with parapet or cornice; The applicant is proposing a flat roof to match exactly with the existing roof for the second level of the same building. This standard is met. v. When an addition to an existing structure or a new structure is proposed in an existing nonresidential development, the roof forms for the new structures must have similar slope and be constructed of the same materials as the existing roof. The applicant is proposing a flat roof to match exactly with the existing roof for the second level of the same building. This standard is met. FINDING: The proposal meets all applicable standards. SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Final Decision: A downtown design review is a Type I procedure. As such, this decision is final for purposes of appeal on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. This decision is not appealable locally and is the final decision of the City. THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 19TH, 2019, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 20TH, 2019. Questions: If you have any questions,please contact Samuel Copelan at (503) 718-2450 or SamuelC@tigard-or.gov. cdtedidfit_ September 19`h, 2019 APPROVED BY: Samuel Copelan Assistant Planner DDR2019-00004&SLR2019-00002.SECOND LEVEL OF 12559 SW MAIN STREET 7 of 7 — 0 —0 c 0 — .1,D 20'-10" (C..) .....3 / / / 8'-011 / 00 o it N 0_ o ( `V(I) 1 . \ w n r--I- 5 CD •CD rn CO, o� • • 6. � 0. o = in CD o = 00 - Sv CD C`'` Cl) 0 - 1 _.' N cr 71 -_--_-_ o o .... n _ \ z -v mm ►� z� m zLI i> o m7i `o. m Doz o - , o a o LI pm o v 1 v e- 0cn m F a Tigard Building L E E KA Architecture and Planning m m -D r 0g - z rn CCI z m m m z R Proposed Elevation Modificaitons Creating Positive Impressions in the Built Environment cow 3 va, ° 503.644.4222 tel c r, a 12259 SW Main Street 503.233.8792 fax 0 N 2548 SE ANKENY ST succeedC�leekainc.com e—mail p �o m Tigard,Oregon PORTLAND, OREGON 97214 www.leekainc.com web rj RECEIVED SEP 10 2019 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING 'I 1 I .71F ii, 1 1 1 n 1. . 1_____, , i : I 1,---1, HI 1 1 HI i I.. i II, ii 7 1 i _i, 11111 1 i , , i I= . 1 1 ,, i .. 1 a....,-.: .-.. 1,1___I , 1 i _ . .. . ..„ ,.. ... ..._............,..._, . _. ....„ .. _ ......„,...... ........... .„...._ ....._,.„.. r.. ...:,..„...___,__„,,, ,.....„:„.,__ -,,,„:: „,„ :...... . ___-_-_ . ,, _ „. --.„. „.,,_ _ _ ,,; ... .. a ,.... . ..,..,,„ CITY Or TIGARD ?approved by Planning Date: _ 1_16tli initials:_ RECEIVED AUG 21 2019 CITY OF TIGARD le....... . is i7 PLANNING/ENGINEERING **-.)1 I I11 ' -_-: EIJ 1 , 1 1 , i 1, i_. __ ______ a - -- - i ., ......... ...... , -1 ____, , '1,4 010011414 fp Oktil00410 � k S '3 qz cvis Architect of Record View looking North East L E E K A ARCHITECTURE 8 PLANNING 1001 SE Water Avenue Suite 175 PORTLAND,OREGON 97214 WW`IV.LEEKAINC.COM S U C CE E D(r LEE KAI NC.COM 503-644-4222 CITY GF d IGARD Approved by Planning dateitial: �`Iq�� r� s Sc APPLICANT MATERIALS City of Tigard RECEIVED Case#:slA(GC_ 4O/9— C T 111 I le COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �tr � -OM Z / TIGARD Master Land Useci c Jt.jr' a n PLANNIN!l= LAND USE APPLICATION TYPE ❑ Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADL) ❑ Modification: ❑ Type I O Type II ❑ Adjustment ❑ Planned Development: ❑ Annexation O Consolidated Plan O Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment O Concept Plan O Conditional Use O Detailed Plan Downtown Design Review: g Sensitive Lands Review: k Track 1 0 Track 2 0 Track 3Type I O Type II O Type III ❑ Home Occupation-Type II ❑ ite Development Review: O Type I ❑ Type II ❑ Land Partition ❑ Subdivision ❑ Lot Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation ❑ Temporary Use Permit O Marijuana Facility Permit El Urban Forestry Plan: ❑ Miscellaneous: U Modification O Discretionary Review O Type II O Type III O Zoning Map Amendment PROJECT INFORMATION /1-( k_('`,, Project name: Sd-C el CC' (C27(/ ` � Y� 96 Brief description of project: C MCf < ,.-„,-,,1 (�c� j c d41t' ®vt e 4 "_'( ��`�` rliA's ' -' dL ,�-fvia4 /zoo'e� _ i._Ir I Mo Gave, Q 4-o -14 6pt,'l ,'.-2., - IC212 . W.,'Sei_ aia-esS'c5. SITE INFORMATION �* Location (address if available): �� 9 SwG+N`� Tax map and tax lot number(s): Site size: Zone: APPLICANT INFORM TION Name: e•------di C ` u) YA._ / Mailing address: /0 $( l/ev Cr City/State: t-1446/#72/ / Zip: 91722-Li---- Phone: '7Z2'� Phone: /(7>> ZT �D�13 Email: XUV(.0 6�Q`J/l fir/ ,,Cbt 7 Applicant's representative: Phone: Email: City ofTigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of2 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION /ame as applicant (Attach list for additional owners) Name: Mailing address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Email: SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS In addition to this application form,you must submit all required items listed in Subsection 18.710.030.0 of Tigard's Community Development Code. If you are unsure what is required with your application,please contact the planner on duty at 503-718-2421 or tigardplanneronduty(n,tigard-or.gov. I certify that I am the property owner or I am eligible to initiate this application,as provided in the Tigard Community Development Code. To the best of my knowledge,all the information provided within this application package is complete and accurate. Applicant's signature* Print name Date Property owner's signature* Print name Date Property owner's signature* Print name Date *The owner must sign this application or submit a separate written authorization when the owner and applicant are different people. STAFF USE ONLY Case No.: Re�� )c -06Z4- pplication fee: '-$f 7 Received by: Date: Related Case(s): Determined complete by: Date: City ofTigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • www.tigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 2 oft RECEIVED SEP 10 2019 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING J __ p _ I �.. RECEIVED AUG 2 1 2019 CITY OF TIGARD -''_AN VG/ENGINEERING 3 0 ' I F111 iI L„....._ , ., ......._• : , , , __,, . , . , lir, . ,.., i . ., .tom , _._ "sem_ ,-_ * / '-, ,,''-';‘,'a';--4r, ' 1.,,,,._,._,.1 , _ ItItilMINP :: 4lqiii'. 4 E Street Facing View Architect of Record LEEKA ARCHITECTURE&PLANNING 1001 SE Water Avenue Suite 175 PORTLAND, OREGON 97214 WWW.LEEKAING.COM SUCCEED@LEEKAINC.COM 50'-544-4222 RECEIVED AUG 21 2019 CITY OF TIGARD '_ANNING/ENGINEEF'' I► ,,1LT1TLani E] 11. a. Architect of Record View looking North East LEEK A ARCHITECTURE&PLANNING 1001 SE Water Avenue Suite 175 PORTLAND, OREGON 97214 W WW.LEEK AI N C.COM SUCCEED@LEEKAINC.COM 503-644-4222 RECEIVED AUG 2 1 2019 CITY OF TIGARD ,- ';GINEF_RINC .., , :, 'i [ H ...... 111 111 01 ., I..,. 1 „.,-:, i'i', . :*„ f . / .0,,,A.L,,,, _2, H R Frit .. . . , .. ..mtaim I- - - -- '' ' 7 1 I I''..9.'' ; ' ,p! :._, 1.0, wil i : 1 ,....e.P., /7-71 ..n. View looking Northwest Architect of Record LEEKA ARCHITECTURE&PLANNING 1001 SE Water Avenue Suite 175 PORTLAND, OREGON 97214 WWW.LEE KA I N C.COM SUCCEED@LEEKAINC.COM 503-644-4222 RECEIVED AUG 21 2019 CITY OF TIGARD ?LANNING/ENGINEERING _-,,.,,14, --...., i ,ii 'I. , .,,rI,..,1[.13I,.'.. : J,. - _ [,Li ! - _ 1 ...,_, • ,11 .-7i .1i ,Lt' F,. ..,,1.7_,_,.... 111, 1 ii, .., ,, , , tLi [i �' 141.I i ✓ d 4 ii Architect of Record View looking Northwest LEEKA ARCHITECTURE&PLANNING 1001 SE Water Avenue Suite 175 PORTLAND, OREGON 97214 WW W.LEEK AI N C.COM S U CCEED@LEEKAINC.COM 503-644-4222 RECEIVED AUG 21 2019 CITY OF TIGARD P' ^^'"1 IG/ENGINEFD sI, , _i , , ir. , .,_ ,1, , , . „, .. .,, _ , _ _._. , ,t tri D._ ., _ ______ , , , i /3 ,1 .1 , . , , ,,, •,: , , . ,,, , ,,.. , ._. ___,,,, ,, : s . . , , , , {. 1 ........ „ ,,,,. . .,.,...._,:„„. .., , .,. . , , , . , .,,,i_.;,.. , ,,„, .. ,7. r /3 7-1 11 INIP- , pr _ 3a� r `eft Street Facing View Architect of Record LEEKA ARCHITECTURE&PLANNING 1001 SE Water Avenue Suite 175 PORTLAND, OREGON 97214 WWW.LEEKAINC.COb1 SLiCCEED@LEEKAINC.COM 503-644.4222 Elevations RECEIVED , AUG 21 2019 CITY OF TIGARD 5 1.,,.. (A4) Wind• pow 18(A _ 8. Win, (A3) Wind PLANNING/ENGINEERI ; indoor 17(A w 1 (�) 1 EastElevation 1 ; r j 7. D•or3 4. 1) a ,wr • .uPP win. . � . (A6) Win, ; (A8) Wing� ili(A2) Wing� : � ,a,, L Shed (2) z,, 36„ ' Wi..pw11 1 Window 10(A10) 6 o! 2) Window 9(A9) S,e,.,,tlp' 1' ) 1 M` 3h (I , li 2 i Elevations 10/23/2015 Page:44 GEORGE_KADEY 1 1 i i Washington i-ni ntv Oreg. :. Washington -t. _ _a_.. 2017_043304! r IS-0w Sfi=O S AWNS 06/01/2017 09:45:07 AM (-c1 s rho q11 on s5 oo rn n cam nn .P_.R51 no 1...-. .-.._- rn-..-.- YRtiTT arm i-Y. 6 Officio County Clerk for Washington acerro r.Oreton,do hereby I I A e k THIS SPACE RE certify that the within i�trument of writing was received and `4y,< !C. a orded in ire boos�racords al aatd county. • ....� w - trirnar.i i-. rwmi�i5r irarinr.f i i I Assessment and Taxation,Ex-Officio .*14z4/17 I I I I Atter recording return to; i Yu Xu and Nae Han RECEIVED I 70755 SW Naeve Street t TinarLi, QR 47794 (( AUG 212019 I 1 Until a change is requested all tax statements shall be sent to the CITY OF TIGARD I foiir:winc4 a dre• PLANNING/ENGINEERING , wi.�::i::� �.��.. t I i Vu Xu and ZIve Han i i 10755 SW Naeve Street I Tigard, OR 97224 iI t.. Air, • -e0.,_MS2r� 'r,'j; 1 i l .tt,"").41 Date: February 16,2017 I i i i STATUTUKY WAKK,AN I Y DEET) i_r y_-and _i __, _nt- Vu Xuand 7.1 e !-!=n nteses the fni� w!n ..- -.-"��� ]tf�J�Yi{74i� Gttiai 5 to Yu .i ice+ • g .•.ea+�s propert yy Jficaii.....s}fo he ilii• I {f siescri i. e'el ens.a.. i Tr'n ; urait.: , c .zp1.AY .1 G:..il1C�nY Ji.L•L i 4G7VtIV4V /wYt tet Viewt•, i•w •' c..' See Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference incorporated herein. '''R Subject to; 1. Covenants,conditions, restrictions and/or easements, If any,affecting title,which may appear in t _ ._.,ui-record; including those shown on any record ri plat Or aury yy iii:: Ui.tuir'a.ic..:.n:t-'t.t: including those -:.p __-- _ _. _... - The true consideration for this conveyance Is$600,000.00. (Here comply with requirements of ORS 93.030) 1.. ' 1. 1 Xi i 1 i j{i i 1 r •r.Jr .. . r i ii t t I1 1 l I APN:8461743 Statutrnr Warranty Deed File No.:7072-2802743 fcdj) -continued BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE 11 i LE SHOULD D i RIGHTS, ANY ORS 3 0 1 5 3U AND IT-;...10t,- TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE � "iv�lYtJ IF ANY, UNDLR 1,JaJVV, 17J.JVL r.f.Tj /V 193.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO ii, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010, THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLAi ION Ot- AFFL CAL:ile L.AN 13 u L Lf WS AND RtGUL T TONS. Tttrurct SIGNING OR ACCEPTING ING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TIT LE`f0 THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A 1 AWFT u I Y ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL,AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, To VEPJPI THE nPPP?OVVED USES ? E THF T_OT OP_ PARCF , TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON i..AWSU1 S AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES,AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195,300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195 335 AND SECTIONS 5 Tn 11, nHAPTFq /174 flPF nh1 i Awc 7!1117 SECTIONS 7 TO 4 AND 17. r.l,,, R S[ /1 FGON, ANS 2009,"ID SECTIONS"1TO CHAPTER OREGON�T i 4 WS 7010, i -1-6M 3,il�L-l]V1V Lfi#.YJ Y1./ iv / Dated this -) / day of (rift Z/ - , 20 • T 1 S'�Y-'�L ;T.IL OF Oregon j i JJ$. I County of Washington ) - j 1-11!e• nstr , of IrkT Arirnnrnlierintx# net re me on MN Li``_ aay or f # t 1._-._ __, 20 I by George S. Kadey,Jr.. ( frInik-it-11, �:� f .r.-,---;:',-, CAS C R Notary Public for Oregon ( - ALsrAMP NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My commission expires: i- i_ Z L _1Z p. ....-_ uO t f LTi N NO,v 0., myr.!*111�l1Rlnv,,,. ,..,...App..--- vv t t„ i v I a L:A ; Yi..r.m.f30 /H... Y �i Wil/ T 7 e i i I ! 1 I paw: 7 a- 3 T t I I t } i 1 APN:R461743 Statutory Warranty Deed File Md.:7O72-2802743( JJJ) -continued 3-iiaA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Real property in the County of Washington, State of Oregon,described as follows: Section T�+...-.4i.. 2 South, tract of land in the Emil A.and Oilvia T.3Oiieisun:Trace lir Sectioi: 2,Township South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian,In the City of Tigard,County of Washington and State of Oreoon,described as follows: Beginning at an iron rod found on the Southeasterly tine or the reiocateo state highway,said iron rod bears South 55° 09'West 177.95 feet from the iron pipe at the Northeast corner of thQ Christa.lsen Tract(Deed Book 178_.Pane 1.Wachlneton,Oregon County,Deed Records, wherehn Eski IynrFMnact rornor Fc Suri to ha Strath 45° 00' East 131 feet South 45"00 West 1807.10 feet from the Northeast corner of the South one-half of the John Hicklin Donation Land Claim);thence from aforesaid rod and true point of beginning and following the e.outhe,steet.e South. 450 45'g0"gloat 9n flat to an iron roti:tins on t: of feet width f ,.t., tie eee+emYent(Maori Book 1 f 2. P-Ane 457); lir.�e'�.S �'iSfi,i=a'iCi�F!Ina a 20 feet •w.a+«ra.•.. a......,...--.- --_._-_ --_i _ ,,,�' - thence continuing South 45°45'30" West 84.24 feet to an iron pipe;thence South 45°03' East 62.78 feet to an iron pipe on the Northwesterly line of the County Road;thence on said County Roadway line forth 57 .ais.r 42f eet to an Iron pipe!nazi-Intl the Southwesterly line the 20 foot?Ado.:fo tpat`n ea m(�..nt at its n _tion with the County Southwesterly of •-• r--• Road; thence continuing North 57° 57' East 37.48 feet to a point in Fenno Creek;thence a meander thereof North 36°30'West 78.6 feet to a point;thence continuing on creek meander North FS° 52'West 5,10 feet to the point en the Southeasterly Highwayrine; thence South 45°45'30"West 21.SS feet to the true point of beg;--41-4. . EXCEPTING,therefrom the aforementioned said footpath easement of record. NOTE;This legal description was creates prior to 3anuary 1,2008. Page 3 of 5 k ! !11 ii l E ' CORRESPONDENCE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED Samuel Copelan AUG 2 8 2019 kdi =r TOTS ID From: Yu Xu <xuyu62@hotmail.com> PLANNING/ENGINEERING Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 9:24 AM To: Samuel Copelan Subject: Re: DDR2019-00004 Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Hi Sam, 1)The total valuation of adding second level to match the whole building is$100,000.00. 2)The project will take place as follows, A.Tear off current roof of 12559 see main st. B. Building up frame of second level. C. Put on roof and sidings on the new framing. D. Interior insulation, electrical wiring, hvac system, dry wall, ... Hope the above answers your questions. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Eric (971)244-2073 On Aug 28, 2019, at 8:58 AM, Samuel Copelan<samuelc@tigard-or.gov>wrote: Good morning Eric, I am reviewing your application and I need the following: • Valuation of the work that will take place • Detailed description of all work to take place Please note that this is not an official completeness letter, these are only the missing items that I easily identified from looking at your submittal. Thanks, Sam Copelan Assistant Planner City of Tigard; Community Development 1 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Phone: (503)-718-2450 Email: Samuelc@tigard-or.gov DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 RECEIVED SEP 102019 18.650.060 Design Standards CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING A. Create vibrant first stories, streetscapes, and rights-of-way; provide weather protection; and promote safety and security. 2. Standards. c. Windows. Minimum window coverage includes any glazed portions of doors. iii. Upper floor windows for all buildings. (A)The minimum window area of street-facing facades above a first story is 30 percent,except on top stories that include sloped roofs and dormer windows. %/z 5> J.J S rC 2,7 ;Q.22 (B)The minimum ratio of vertical to horizontal dimensions for windows on a street-facing facade above a first story is 1.5:1. /G,S ;,pS / (.5ee- aWU v' e ) iv. Window shadowing for all buildings. Windows must be recessed 3 inches into the facade. Nonresidential and mixed-use buildings may instead incorporate trim of a contrasting material or color. Ye 5 21,-/- A/4 /--e&fre,/ 3 A. Integrated building facade standards. 2. Standards. a. Facades. i. Nonresidential and mixed-use buildings without residential component. Buildings 2 stories and above must have 3 clearly defined elements on the street-facing facade: a base (extends from the sidewalk to the bottom of the second story or the belt course that separates the ground floor from the middle of the building); a middle (distinguished from the top and base of the building by use of building elements); and a top (roof form or element at the uppermost portion of the facade that visually terminates the facade). b. Roof forms. i. The roof form of a building must follow one (or a combination) of the ollowing forms: KA-)--Flat roof with parapet or cornice; VeS (B)Hip roof; (C)Gabled roof; (D)Full mansard roof; (E)Dormers; or (F)Shed roof. RECEWED SEP 10 2019 CITY OF TIGARD 18.510.040 General Provisions for Special Flood Hazard Areas PLANNING/ENGINEERING E. Resistant to flood damage.All new construction and substantial improvements,including manufactured homes, must be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. yesivalog A �fJ f (c, /101:- Gt, d s e-4 F. Minimize flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes, must be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. YC 5 ify-to ;1d►.A sem. t2 ' e1- e,tievrGI e_ G. Equipment protection. Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air-conditioning equipment and other service facilities must be designed or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. id rt L I. Anchoring. All new construction, all manufactured homes and substantial improvements must be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure. ctLeor C AAr2— 4/4( 067 M. Nonresidential construction. New construction and substantial m rove im ent of any ay commercial,industrial,or other nonresidential structure must either have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to the level of the base flood elevation, or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, must: 1. Be floodproofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water; / �rho / 2. Have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy; 54 .c� `�( /free.-44 vi"Lt() 06247 3. a certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the design and methods of construction are in compliance with accepted standards of practice for meeting provisions of this subsection based on their development or review of the structural design,specifications and plans. Such certifications must be provided to the building official as provided in Paragraph 18.510.030.E.2; and Yc, 't _-v t 'e /'^ee �� 717'ct 4. Nonresidential structures that are elevated, not floodproofed, must meet the same standards for space below the lowest floor as described in Paragraph 18.510.040.L.2. Applicants flood-proofing nonresidential buildings must be notified that flood insurance premiums will be based on rates that are 1 foot below the floodproofed level (e.g., a building constructed to the base flood level will be rated as 1 foot below that level).I/! �h- e---74- �y C� '5 r 4,< /"� C .. - ' RECEIVED SEP 102019 CITY OF TIGARD iv. All flat roofs or those with a pitch of less than 5/12 must Ot9 EERING treated or articulated with a parapet wall that projects vertically above the roof line at least 12 inches or a cornice that projects from the building face at least 6 inches. '1 pQ n� le COAX a ` p7Pst6 67t" 4740ri f /� CJ nf- J Pel (AST v. When an addition to an existing structure or a new structure is proposed in an existing nonresidential development, the roof forms for the new structures must have similar slope and be constructed of the same materials as the existing roof. National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette :3,FEMA Legend 45°25'49.75"N SEE RS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LA7TUJr Er,R Zone A� <C,,• y r . WNlohouut Base Rood Bevation(BFE) r' t '` ��, t�4i �� �t SPECIAL FLOOD WRh BFE Or Depth zone AR no,AH. F AR Zane AE ( `t,. i� HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Roodway 1 Q *f ti 0.2%Annual Chance Rood Hazard,Areas r • " o'4. �� V - « g of 1%annual chance flood with average ' fit ; M1V { depth less than one foot or with drainage t �' ;--° areas of less than one square mile z,o=a ` " , '� • Future Conditions 1%Annual 140 t. r /N Chance Rood Hazard Zone x N s •• it Area with Reduced Rood Risk due to p Levee See Notes.zoo,x rOTHER AREAS OF °. ", `' �, + ' FLOOD HAZARD Area with Rood Risk due to Levee 7,,o=c t Zane AE m �/ .� JNo SCREEN' Area of Minimal Flood Hazard .•_,.,1110 1 .:.'alt. - 1�i3 ct4-[t Effective LCMRs • . ,. . .5,... ., .. �4j*,. •-•. ..- I OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard',__•c m - '� s rv. C�IERAL - - Channel,Qilvert,or Storm Sewer ..... ,,. , ., . ... .... _- ---- STRUCTURES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Levee,Dike,or Floodwall . 4tom, y.. *, ., ,,, t•1 l� of T i ;ard ., 20 z Cross Sections with 1%Annual Chance (}�?(� f` '� II' 17 5 Water Surface Elevation 41k' AREA ?F MINIMAL FLC7[=C+ HA-LARD `�7^ Coastal Transect r• ° _ Base Rood Bevation Line(BFE) " i �; t Limit of Study L...!-,F 1 W S2 ° *4T �.� Jurisdiction Boundary ) -- - Coastal Transect Baseline OTHER Profile Baseline Isct ' ,�= ' 41067C, .I I / FEATURES N"'1RP s , Hydrographic Feature -, Digital Data Available •• ►` ° Zone AE h r:, Q No Digital Data Available aII MAP PANELS ,L I 0 Unmapped 411, 1 \I °' The pin displayed on the map is an approximate " + ,� point selected by the user and does not represent r • fr �I an authoritative property location. wsI 4.01Nk` of S _ This map complies with FBvIA's standards for the use of t. FLOODWAY fAY digital flood maps if it isnot void as described below. `i`•. The basemap shown complies with FBv1A's basemap .• ` accuracy standards 1 i The flood hazard information is derived directly from the I'•, authoritative NF-L web services provided by FEMA.This map was exported on 9/11/2019 at 2:00:07 PM and does not r " '"�= reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and '� N time.The NFHL and effective information may change or e 11,} a become superseded by new data over time. W a This map image is void if the one or more of the following map AO r w elements dol not appear:basemap imagery,flood zone labels, ti d,� r Y1 legend,scale bar,map creation date,community identifiers, sJt -.;fir r'l r 1u _ /,�� r - 45°25'24.51"N FlRM panel number,and FIRM effective date.Map images for Feet 1:6,000 unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 regulatory purposes. ) Vicinity Map ,� ,, 'Cr:Pi MapTitle Beaverton �� � �° !!/f4 " ♦ ,' ! r r �A .41 oul Tic atc! '- '►',,,. n '. t City of Tigard, Oregon '3 4404 Vit., t4. ` Maintenance I�sponsibility 44 "'# i'` ',5 — Oty of Tgard TtfaJatrrt ♦t� "�;+ _ COOT S,'?"'`L y :! ''� ♦, :- OtY of Fbrtland `i , r, — Washington County +411: .4.- Private k. 440'. ♦. r `�>�41t- f 4} imp firr I**o, ! IP t ! 4 :1", � r"` m ONSVegetated Corridor Via` !♦ ♦11 1%1:1 I ! ® o tit' ! !! kq, �♦ 9opes Greater t han 25/o { «� !♦ .i 4,14#40 4tito *IA I"440.' ` `Y Goal 5 9gnificant Habitat Areas 4 / , �!'iif� 4 ,..4 ,,. ,x', r ,;7v., .%�> ♦ ■ -ghestValueHTbitat A yx:- 1 :i . „),,, # ,♦0 `-'' 40, '' ...)„,,v0400" ♦A :. f�( 41 !!• yak / . ,fir 1� ��T . / 111*.* v �!* 1 ♦ Off! v • ,<e" to, . 12553 t 12559 44:.!,,° 1 12555 '4 � . ^ Oat:,.tler'vetl from multiple a rhe C tY of Tigertl 4; makes n my or guarantee e (M1e c nen acyret melinae at or c mplataneae°.1.°.,, e ,neccurec teeprovitletl M1erein TM1eoc ltYo 1 T Bertl eM1rell aY o lieb lily for any e ,..,'4, '#+/ * ''.* :: he formation provtl etl'Be gartl lea a of 6 how ceuaetl. a 3.ro . ,. 45 M a .12571 },,. ' 1110111 . /,.w44f, Scale: 0.01 Miles a �' � � City of Tigard ''LL 13125 SW Hall Blvd .� = w ' Tigard, OR 97223 4 Map Created: (503)639-4171 os/112o1g www.ti and-or. ov TIGARD m .: _„..—,4•.. 9 g 1111111 a ' TIGARD City of Tigard September 4th,2019 Eric (Yu)Xu 10755 SW Naeve Street Tigard,OR 97224 Project: Second Level of 12559 SW Main Street Site: 12559 SW Main Street;WCTM 2S102AC00800 Land Use File: DDR2019-00004 Dear Mr. Xu: The City received the above referenced application on August 2151, 2019. Staff has evaluated your application for completeness against Tigard's submittal requirements and determined that additional information is required. I. Completeness Items In order for your application to be deemed complete,please submit the following items: 1. Sensitive Lands Review(I) Submittal a. Please submit a check with the amount of$831, ayable to the City of Tigard, to the j i City of Tigard Permit Center , 2. Building Elevations a. Staff needs a copy of the site plan that is drawn to scale on either 8 '/z" x 11" or on 11"1/' x 17" paper. b. Staff needs all the dimensions for the buildings shown on the site plan 3. Narrative � / a. Please state that your application is for a Downtown Design Review(DDR) and V Sensitive Lands Review(SLR). b. Please confirm that no changes to the building footprint or any ground disturbance is proposed. c. Please submit a document responding to the criteria listed in CDC 18.510.040 and r/ CDC 18.650.060 d. Please confirm that 12549, 12551, 12555,and 12559 are all active addresses within j/- the building. i. If not,please fill complete an Address and Commercial Suite Application form and send electronically to samuelcnu.tigard-or.gov 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov Determination of Completeness Page 2 Land Use File DDR2019-00004 II. Completeness Options This letter contains the completeness review from all relevant City Departments. Please be advised that no further action will be taken on your application until one of the following events occurs: (1) you submit all completeness items, (2)you submit some completeness items and request that the City deem your application complete, or (3) you submit no completeness items and request that the City deem your application complete. Once your application is deemed complete, staff will review your application for approvability. III. When Your Application Become Void Per ORS 227.178, your application will be void if one of the three actions listed above is not taken within 180 days of the date you submitted your application.The date on which your application would become void is February 17t, 2020. Please be aware that application fees are non-refundable. If an application becomes void,the City may retain some or all of the related application deposits. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (503) 718-2450 or SamuelC@tigard-or.gov. Sincerely, 1,,,,,,,g, C6pLt- Samuel Copelan Assistant Planner