Loading...
UFR2019-00006 APPROVED UFR2O 19 - 00006 PORTER LANE , LLC NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION URBAN FORESTRY REVIEW UFR2019-00006 h MODIFICATION OF URBAN FORESTRY PLAN FOR PORTER LANE, LLC TIGARD 120 DAYS = November 14, 2019 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: Porter Lane,LLC CASE NO.: Urban Forestry Review(UFR) UFR2019-00006 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to modify the Urban Forestry Plan approved under the Land Partition for Porter Lane, LLC (Case No. MLP2017-00007). Specifically, the applicant proposes to remove four (4) trees on Parcel 1, and 14 trees on Parcel 3 that were originally proposed for preservation,in order to accommodate new single detached houses of a particular design. APPLICANT: Porter Lane,LLC Attn:Jeffrey T. O'Brien 13835 SW Sandridge Drive Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Same as applicant LOCATIONS: 10949 and 10979 SW Errol Street WCTM 2S103AA,Tax Lots 4500 and 4700 BASE ZONE: R-4.5: Low Density Residential Zone APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code (CDC) Chapter 18.420.060.F SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request.The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. UFR2019-00006 Porter Lane,LLC—Urban Forestry Plan Modification 1 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information: The subject properties are Parcels 1 and 3 of the Porter Lane,LLC Partition(Case No.MLP2017-00007), which was approved by the City of Tigard Planning Division in November 2017. The properties are located on the north side of SW Errol Street, east of SW 124th Avenue, and west of SW Fonner Street. During land use review for Case No. MLP2017-00007, the applicant proposed to construct half-street improvements,including a sidewalk and planter strip. However, after the land use decision was issued,the applicant was approved to pay a fee in-lieu of street improvements.Accordingly,because the sidewalk and planter strip were no longer being constructed, the applicant proposed to pay a fee in-lieu of planting four (4) street trees that were shown on the original Urban Forestry Plan. In April 2018, the City of Tigard Planning Division approved this modification (Case No. UFR2018-00002). The applicant now proposes a second modification to the original Urban Forestry Plan. Specifically, the applicant proposes to remove four (4) trees on Parcel 1, and 14 trees on Parcel 3 that were originally proposed for preservation, in order to accommodate new single detached houses of a particular design. The subject properties are zoned Low-Density Residential (R-4.5). SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS 18.420.060.F. Urban forestry plan modification. Except as exempted in Paragraph 18.420.060.F.1, an application to modify the urban forestry plan component of a land use approval is processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050, using the approval criteria in Paragraph 18.420.060.F.2. The applicant proposes to modify the Urban Forestry Plan approved under the Land Partition for Porter Lane,LLC (Case No. MLP2017-00007). Specifically, the applicant proposes to remove four (4) trees on Parcel 1,and 14 trees on Parcel 3 that were originally proposed for preservation,in order to accommodate new single detached houses of a particular design. The removal of these trees is not exempt from the Type I Urban Forestry Plan Modification. Therefore, this application is subject to the approval criteria outlined below. 2. Approval criteria. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions the modification to the urban forestry plan component of a land use approval when all of the following are met: a. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that the previously approved urban forestry plan did not account for the circumstances that led to the proposed modification; The applicant was originally approved for a Type II Land Partition, and was not required to submit an Urban Forestry Plan that was coordinated and approved by an arborist or landscape architect (CDC 18.420.060.B.1). Instead, the applicant has provided a revised report and statement certifying that the previously approved Urban Forestry Plan did not account for the circumstances that led to the proposed modification. During land use review,the applicant did not provide estimated building footprints for the proposed new homes on Parcels 1 and 3. The applicant is now completing final building plans for the proposed new homes, and requests to remove trees that were originally proposed for preservation, in order to accommodate the new building footprints. This criterion is met. b. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed modification; and UFR2019-00006 Porter Lane,LLC—Urban Forestry Plan Modification 2 The applicant has provided a revised report and statement certifying that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed modification. This criterion is met. c. The project arborist or landscape architect demonstrates compliance with Subsection 18.420.060.B through a modified urban forestry plan. (Ord. 18-28 §1) The applicant submitted a revised Urban Forestry Plan and supplemental report that demonstrate compliance with CDC 18.420.060.B,including tree preservation,protection, and canopy standards. This criterion is met. CONCLUSION: As demonstrated in the analysis above, the proposed modification to the Urban Forestry Plan Component of the approved Porter Lane, LLC Partition meets all applicable approval criteria. SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was provided to: X The applicant and owner Final Decision: A Modification to the Urban Forestry Plan Component of a Land Use Approval is a Type I Procedure. As such, this decision is final for purposes of appeal on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. This decision is not appealable locally, and is the final decision of the City. THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 18, 2019, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JULY 19, 2019. Questions: If you have any questions,please contact Lina Smith at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCSntigard-or.gov. 401110- July 18, 2019 APPROVED BY: Lina Smith,Assistant Planner Community Development Director's Designee UFR2019-00006 Porter Lane,LLC—Urban Forestry Plan Modification 3 CITY OF TIGARD Approved b Planning Date: (--- Initials: ...._..,_. L 'TAEE PRO,EO.IOH NOlEB: V6t 1tIIF - aAT IF n �n a-.Aa,, OF CONTRACTOR 11 RESPODS.1 FOR CCOOMAIVIC NM ISE MOE.MOM! -14 q --_"', (�.7r.. t�� 5-1C01 TED KIM.FDIC.OEM ODOM.ARMORED BY RE OTY er" MANAGER Ca et lee cox ar et re r ' 3° H\V�_ ��`30.1+ � ��1 l�� �� PIECOMISOCTOR COSTROCE ISE P.A.AMMO SOU.SE OR STE m 32.2441tai ilk �I�I �►�i1 MY CO.M.SOM +wars cw ACP WO.IF M1 OM MOM. rill i POST..BY A C.O.TREE SERI. S.IQ PROMO.ROE IMMI.MICE.IDE MM.FOODG SO.X01 AI 40 1114. --ip. ........ _...... IL STOWE CF,MT DA..OR.....r 114E ONTEACTOR SNAIL HOT EACAVAIEN O.DATO.10.1.PROTECTED MEI ORS..Sx.RE AM.(MIEF.TDES ME POEM.SMARM.rE VRAKIIIMILE. iii�` !G.�1 PARCEL 3 /- ex a soon me meows roe 030011SACIOD MEMO 5.11 RE ,. RMON TO a..arwos w A.M.AMMO.EL MIKIS TO IDE PROOSED w'""w'DE -Mrs tWEAN ME MR.OF MOIKTED..OXIO 4•10vii 1•v�� ;x �;E ':r�./` • ra' ..11,WW1 SOUPS .44IF 1�1 41° PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 �:4.4010k ��fi.r��l ♦ rs„>m„sa,,.r,,.,,,rs,,,,m.r,. caECTOR me N00.4)OW I10.01 COP..O MOWED TM ?: 34�1 "%.r , 11.TREE...mune.oeseeceee,DE MICOST ART1061S.1 DISSECT MO i�•��� DE WARM :Ru.C.IMKS.MO w..ma. ,�.,L.G,m �f MOOR W ACRE 0...w,-. •• .��•Q MASKED YID . •.•., e6Oe'�Rrsm.r.srs :11:\ik$RI ' KU.TO WASITAM MO PROTECT OTE MANIC MEM Ill "114 RECESFOOITS SMALL CO.S01 TO IA/N.M.SOME.M. IRE CREME 4110SCAPE COORACTOO TOMO MRS.MO(WM/MEET St 10.10•0411 ODE Mi6.11 AOSCOADEn C.O.E.D.FOR IA SI 9.1 ASO Mt ROM..ME•FORIAATEM :.RIIii :e-.: f 3�, /i LEGEND ..j 12! . ��� �,,`.D��l� \� 1 • 1 czar _ 11 6 8.1'POSSIBLE 1 l. r•• ,"SIBLE 1 cmx rv� .TREE TO BE SNOW° t'�•���V��. FUTURE % r/ S..• FUTURE 1 V� \\ HOUSE I % \ ' I/ / / , HOUSE ' LOCATION I / 0 \ 144' •/ LOCATION `..,� i 1 V9I I / 41 I I ,,'fur, : 0 _•? R_ . ae.iR.Nm.e Ua,J Oli 11/........) I I +I _-----_ �. .e�� ----- Am M• r_. �� 2:— Amended Urban Forestry Plan / \ / $:; .l;i!'. / - --- 10985 SW Errol St. I Tigard,OR E �_---.� •%i��1_1 �\ III III ---=-- L-- --—-—'leo ———--- ----=`0-----------lei°---- ----'l°—°— NOT TO SCALE STREET TREES NOT REQUIRED, A,ended Plan �, BECAUSE APPLICANT PAID FEE IN- Noted ^ LIEU OF STREET TREES. APPLICANT MATERIALS RECER ae�= r JUL 16 201g City of Tigard CITY OF TIGA* t. Case #: I�� - ad©p COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTNDEPAR�N`� N 1111 TIGARD Master Land Use Application LAND USE APPLICATION TYPE ❑ Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU) ❑ Modification: Li Type I O Type II ❑ Adjustment ❑ Planned Development: ❑ Annexation Li Consolidated Plan ❑ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment O Concept Plan ❑ Conditional Use O Detailed Plan ❑ Downtown Design Review: 0 Sensitive Lands Review: O Track 1 0 Track 2 O Track 3 O Type I O Type II O Type III ❑ Home Occupation-Type II 0 Site Development Review: O Type I O Type II ❑ Land Partition 0 Subdivision ❑ Lot Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation 0 Temporary Use Permit 0 Marijuana Facility Permit In Urban Forestry Plan: 0 Miscellaneous: tg Modification O Discretionary Review O Type II O Type III 0 Zoning Map Amendment PROJECT INFORMATION / Project name: E✓ r d t S 4- PC e Brief description of project: in(‘'b CLL�itc Q ttvL Os- C(, U-( wt Cor 3 PIM .. Ck449.2,7 i€SVG-1, c - e-e_s car -e.coed ottve toe/n-eo- Gk, C erC C, crn 4o ixv.vicrv,S/ fivIton1egar-1 ti c.a e.96,ni'e e . SITE INFORMATION E.T C _ Location (address if available): (©Q( 5 sw 'rd l ST Q Tax map and tax lot number(s): 2 J t o.3 A-A (� 1 ( O 0 I!c./� 4( -` 'Z I Site size: • C0 Q Zone: APPLICANT INFORMATION Name: PO O'er- L.-Le- 2 Mailing address: (3 8 3 s Si Said ri c i Dr City/State: TY3c ( - Zip: q 7 z Z3 Phone: 503-72-o -(( 0 y Email: �1�l A 4) uS 4ed .t S G4>01/1 Applicant's representative: 'U,CCV1 / 1 wl o Phone: S-'03-4% '(eO/ Email: J a A4 if G 6 a p. co ifr 1 City ofTigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of2 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION I Same as applicant (Attach list for additional owners) Name: Mailing address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Email: SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS In addition to this application form,you must submit all required items listed in Subsection 18.710.030.0 of Tigard's Community Development Code. If you are unsure what is required with your application,please contact the planner on duty at 503-718-2421 or tigardplanneronduty(p,tigar-or.gov. I certify that I am the property owner or I am eligible to initiate this application,as provided in the Tigard Community Development Code. To the best of my knowledge,all the information provided within this application package is complete and accurate. 624-(.?/vi def--f-re 1-7 O'Ocrecl -3407 nt' signature* Print name Date Property owner's signature* Print name Date Property owner's signature* Print name Date *The owner must sign this application or submit a separate written authorization when the owner and applicant are different people. STAFF USE ONLY Case No.: 2...0M-0000 Co Application fee: 7C 9 Received by: 010 Date: *7//e Related Case(s): Determined complete by: h Date: .WW City ofTigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 2 of RECEIVED JUL 16 2019 Narrative Statement for Urban Forestry Plan Modification CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING Location: 10965 SW Errol St, Tigard, OR 97223 Lots 1—3, Partition Plat 2019-009 Submission Date:July 16, 2019 To: City of Tigard, Community Land Development Department Introduction: Trees are an integral part of both our communities and the ecological system in which these communities exist. They provide significant economic, social and ecological benefits. They are necessary to sustain healthy communities. Purpose of Modification: The subject property referenced above has an Urban Forestry Plan currently approved with the City of Tigard which has been amended once. The purpose of this Application is to amend the plan once again for two reasons: (1)To accommodate development of lots 1 and 3 with single family homes while retaining all significant/healthy trees possible (2) The correct the original classification of existing trees which incorrectly labeled the type, size and/or condition of several existing trees on the site. Narrative: The original Urban Forestry Plan was submitted by Porter Lane LLC as part of a land partition and at the time of the submission and amendment, Porter Lane LLC intended on selling the two lots to a builder. The lots have been listed for sale and have not sold as of the time of this writing. Porter Lane LLC has interviewed several builders and contracted with Juan Munoz to build two new homes, one on Lot 1 and one on Lot 2. Plans have been selected and are being prepped for submission to the City of Tigard for permits. The Urban Forestry Plan must be amended in order to accommodate new construction. The building plans selected and placement of the homes has been designed in such a manner to minimize the impact on the Urban Forestry Plan exists, specifically significant/healthy trees like the Giant Sequoia Grove. During the course of preparing this application, Porter Lane LLC contracted an arborist (Charlie Carrol, ISA Cert#PN-7835AM)with Northwest Tree Specialists 503-707-6793. The original tree survey was not done by an Arborist and therefore many trees were mislabeled in terms of type and/or size. The arborist provided an excel spreadsheet of tree data which has been attached to this application. Tree data was mapped via CAD and shows the proper location of existing trees, trees proposed for removal and canopy coverage calculations on a per lot and entire site basis. Of the 43 trees found on the entire property 18 are scheduled for removal. Of the 18 trees scheduled for removal 6 are considered to be 'Nuisance' or'Dangerous'. Of the 12 trees scheduled for removal that are not considered 'Nuisance' or 'Dangerous', 4 are considered to be of'Low' or'Very Low Preservation Value' leaving 8 trees that are proposed for removal that have some benefit to the community. ' Mapping data employed by arborist before translation to CAD: `# '% * Vol''* ' : , P:::;*,* ;.**'' .-,::: 10,.A .4,,X'""- ' '''SI''..•4 . , , ..- 4.1,4„,ftii‘ 0,4,41' "ft).*-..,,,,,:** ' ''''''!:' 44«, *...0;,, ,,k,'N. ..tcp.,.., i.., r,....1.-...,. .'.:- ..,4,...,e,f,;:„* )- .. 'ft '-'. et*'04: ' "1":.: i**4 41 # 21 ,* ti Jig . ,,��((ii , „ t .. ,,•"''''.\ •I*', 44..1.... ie' ^tis�,, , . a8 3sa 4 ../itte Al Ila '� 1*??„,-,,. ` W Y;.knol St SW Errol St ./ Sw,Erro7 5tr.,. SW}krrol.: Existing Canopy Standards: It is the intent of this application to comply with Tree Canopy Standards 18.420.060: Chapter 18.420 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 18.420.060 Tree Canopy Standards F. Urban forestry plan modification. Except as exempted in Paragraph 18.420.060.F.1, an application to modify the urban forestry plan component of a land use approval is processed through a Type I procedure,as provided in Section 18.710.050, using the approval criteria in Paragraph 18.420.060.F.2. 1. Exemptions.The following are exempt from a Type I modification application to the urban forestry plan component of a land use approval: a. Removal of any tree shown as preserved in the tree canopy site plan and supplemental report of a previously approved urban forestry plan provided that: i. The project arborist or landscape architect provides a written report prior to removal attesting that either the condition rating or suitability of preservation rating,as provided in the city's Urban Forestry Manual,of the tree has changed to a rating of less than 2;and ii. A revised tree canopy site plan and supplemental report are submitted for review and approval prior to removal that reflect the proposed changes to the previously approved urban forestry plan.The revised tree canopy site plan and supplemental report must demonstrate how the effective tree canopy cover requirements will be provided by tree planting, preservation, or payment of a tree canopy fee in lieu of planting or preservation. b. Modification of the quantity, location, or species of trees to be planted in the tree canopy site plan and supplemental report of a previously approved urban forestry plan provided that: i. The modification results in the same or greater amount of future tree canopy through tree planting as the previously approved urban forestry plan for the lot or tract where the modification is proposed; ii. Payment of a tree canopy fee in lieu of planting is not proposed as part of the modification;and iii. A revised tree canopy site plan and supplemental report are submitted for review and approval prior to planting that reflect the proposed changes to the previously approved urban forestry plan. c. Modification of the tree protection fencing location in the tree preservation and removal site plan, tree canopy site plan,and supplemental report of a previously approved urban forestry plan provided that: i. The project arborist or landscape architect provides a written report prior to modification of the tree protection fencing describing how the proposed modification will continue to protect the viability of the trees shown as preserved in the previously approved urban forestry plan;and ii. A revised tree preservation and removal site plan, tree canopy site plan, and supplemental report are submitted for review and approval prior to modification of the tree protection fencing that reflect the proposed modifications to the previously approved urban forestry plan. 2. Approval criteria. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions the modification to the urban forestry plan component of a land use approval when all of the following are met: a. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that the previously approved urban forestry plan did not account for the circumstances that led to the proposed modification; b. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed modification;and c. The project arborist or landscape architect demonstrates compliance with Subsection 18.420.060.8 through a modified urban forestry plan.(Ord. 18-28§1)■ Urban Forestry Plan Modification: Please see the attached CAD map showing the location of trees to remain and those to be removed. The attached excel table also shows the correct labeling of said trees, status, reason for removal and DBH of all trees. Calculations on the following page break down canopy coverage on a per lot basis as well as for the total site. Second, calculations are shown for the parcels and site after proposed trees are removed. Finally, calculations are shown with double credit given to trees that are to be preserved. • Existing canopy coverage[before removal): Parcel 1 Total Site Area=9977 sf Tree Canopy Total=12997.5 sf Percentag=e of Canape Coverage=13056• Parcell Total Site.Area=10617 sf Tree C=anopy Total=2565 sf Percentage of Canopy Coverage=277% Parcel 3 Total Site Are a=8478sf Tree Canopy Total=105 72 sf Percentage of Canopy Coverage=1245, Overall Total Site Area=29072 sf Tree Can opy Total=2 6434.5 sf Percent age of Canopy Cover=age=91% Canopy coverage after proposed removal: Parcel 1 Total Site Area=9977 sf Tree Canopy Total=10837.5 sf Percentage of Canopy Coverage=1085£ Parcel 2 Total Site Area=10617 sf Tree Canopy Total=29655f Percentage of Canopy Coverage=27 Parcel 3 Total Site Area=8478 sf Tree Canopy Total=4153 sf Percentage of Can apy Coverage=4955 Overall Total Site.Area=23072 sf Final Tree CanopyTotal=17855.5 sf Percentage of Canopy Coverage=515: Canopy cove rage after proposed removal with double credit given to preserved trees: Parcel 1 Total Site Area=9977 sf Tree CenapyTotal=21575sf Percentage of Canopy Coverage=21655 Parcel 2 Total Site Area=10617 sf Tree CanapyTotel=5730sf Percentage of Canopy Coverage=S4% Parcel 3 Total Site Area=8478 sf Tree Canopy Total=8336 sf Percentage of Canopy Coverage=9855 Ove ral l Total Area=29072 sf Tree CanopyTotal=35711 sf Percentage of Canopy Coverage=122%. Summary: In summary, the current amendment application has been designed to comply with current code as all information has now been accurately labeled and measured by a licensed arborist. After removal of proposed trees and double credit is given to preserved trees (as per code allowance) the three lots will have 216%, 54%and 98% respectively, well over the 15%canopy coverage requirement in the Urban Forestry Master Plan. The entire property will have 122%canopy coverage, well over the 40%figure required in the Urban Forestry Master Plan. External ID Common Name Latin Name 39 41 Silver maple Acer saccharinum 40 Sweet cherry Prunus avium 38 English holly Ilex aquifolium 38a Western red cedar Thuja plicata 21 Spruce Picea spp. 20 Spruce Picea spp. 19 Spruce Picea spp. 14a Western red cedar Thuja plicata 14 Western red cedar Thuja plicata ._..._ ._ .... _.__ _�._.__... _...._ .�_ 16 Scotch pine Pinus sylvestris 17 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 15 Tulip tree Liriodendron tulipifera 13 Western red cedar Thuja plicata 12 Western red cedar Thuja plicata 11 Cleveland pear Pyrus calleryana 'Cleveland' 11a Staghorn sumac Rhus hirta 22 English hawthorn Crataegus monogyna 13a European mountain ash Sorbus aucuparia 18 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 32a Common cherry laurel Prunus laurocerasus 32b Sweet cherry Prunus avium 32 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 33a Giant sequoia Sequoiadendron giganteum 33 Giant sequoia Sequoiadendron giganteum 34 Giant sequoia Sequoiadendron giganteum 35 Giant sequoia Sequoiadendron giganteum 36 Giant sequoia Sequoiadendron giganteum 37 Giant sequoia Sequoiadendron giganteum 30a Leyland cypress Cupressus x leylandii 42 Cedrus atlantica 'Glauca Pendula' Weeping Blue Atlas Cedar 29a Cleveland pear Pyrus calleryana 'Cleveland' 30 Spruce Picea spp. 28a Spruce Picea spp. 29 Leyland cypress Cupressus x leylandii 28 Leyland cypress Cupressus x leylandii 23a Paperbark maple Acer griseum 22a Thundercloud purple plum Prunus cerasifera 'Thundercloud' 24 Western red cedar Thuja plicata 25 Western red cedar Thuja plicata 26 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 27 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 23 Atlas cedar Cedrus atlantica Status DBH Tree Height(Estimated) Crown Spread Parcel Stump 20 1 Removed/Missing 15 0 2 Proposed Tree Removal 24 35 25 1 Proposed Tree Removal 5 1 Proposed Tree Removal 39 65 40 1 Proposed Tree Removal 17 75 25 3 Proposed Tree Removal 19 75 25 3 Proposed Tree Removal 8 65 18 3 Proposed Tree Removal 8 40 18 3 Proposed Tree Removal 10 40 18 3 Proposed Tree Removal 12 65 15 3 Proposed Tree Removal 29 95 35 3 Proposed Tree Removal 33 75 35 3 Proposed Tree Removal 13 45 20 3 Proposed Tree Removal 14 15 20 3 Proposed Tree Removal 16 40 30 3 Proposed Tree Removal 5.66 10 15 3 Proposed Tree Removal 26 35 35 3 Proposed Tree Removal 5 25 15 3 Proposed Tree Removal 23 55 25 3 Alive/Suitable for Retention 24.08 35 30 1 Alive/Suitable for Retention 45 50 45 1 Alive/Suitable for Retention 36 80 35 1 Alive/Suitable for Retention 45 75 39 1 Alive/Suitable for Retention 40 95 25 1 Alive/Suitable for Retention 28 95 25 1 Alive/Suitable for Retention 36 95 25 1 Alive/Suitable for Retention 36 95 25 1 Alive/Suitable for Retention 45 95 35 1 Alive/Suitable for Retention 15 50 25 2 Alive/Suitable for Retention 10 8 25 2 Alive/Suitable for Retention 8 25 2 Alive/Suitable for Retention 29 100 35 2 Alive/Suitable for Retention 35 100 35 2 Alive/Suitable for Retention 8 20 25 3 Alive/Suitable for Retention 15 50 25 3 Alive/Suitable for Retention 6 15 15 3 Alive/Suitable for Retention 5.66 20 20 3 Alive/Suitable for Retention 36 65 25 3 Alive/Suitable for Retention 25 75 25 3 Alive/Suitable for Retention 29 75 25 3 Alive/Suitable for Retention 30 75 25 3 Alive/Suitable for Retention 25 80 3 Canopy(ft2) Canopy Double Canopy Shape Open or Stand Heritage Tree? 0 Symmetrical Open No 0 Symmetrical Open No 600 Asymmetrical Open No 0 Symmetrical Open No 1560 Symmetrical Open No 425 Asymmetrical Open No 475 Symmetrical Open No 144 Asymmetrical Open No 144 Asymmetrical Open No 180 Asymmetrical Open No 180 Suppressed Open No 1015 Symmetrical Open No 1155 Symmetrical Open No 260 Symmetrical Open No 280 Suppressed Open No 480 Symmetrical Open No 84.9 Symmetrical Open No 910 Suppressed Open No 75 Symmetrical Open No 575 Asymmetrical Open No 722.4 1445 Symmetrical Open No 2025 4050 Symmetrical Open No 1260 2520 Symmetrical Open No 1755 3510 Suppressed Open No 1000 2000 Asymmetrical Open No 700 1400 Asymmetrical Open No 900 1800 Asymmetrical Open No 900 1800 Asymmetrical Open No 1575 3150 Symmetrical Open No 375 750 Symmetrical Open No 250 500 Asymmetrical Open No 0 0 Symmetrical Open No 1425.5 2851 Symmetrical Open No 1225 2450 Symmetrical Open No 200 400 Suppressed Open No 375 750 Symmetrical Open No 90 180 Suppressed Open No 113.2 226 Symmetrical Open No 900 1800 Asymmetrical Open No 625 1250 Asymmetrical Open No 725 1450 Asymmetrical Open No 750 1500 Asymmetrical Open No 0 0 Symmetrical Open No 26,434 35,711 Condition (Health) City Cond. Rating Preservation Value City Pres. Rating N/A Fair 2 None/nusiance 2 Good 3 None/nusiance 2 Good 3 High 3 Good 3 Moderate 3 Good 3 High 3 Fair 2 Moderate 3 Good 3 Moderate 3 Good 3 Moderate 3 Fair 2 Low 2 Good 3 High 3 Poor 1 Moderate 2 Good 3 Moderate 3 Fair 2 Very low 2 Fair 2 Low 2 Fair 2 Low 2 Fair 2 None/nusiance 1 Fair 2 None/nusiance 2 Good 3 Moderate 3 Good 3 Low 2 Good 3 None/nusiance 2 Good 3 Moderate 3 Good 3 High 3 Good 3 High 3 Good 3 High 3 Good 3 High 3 Good 3 High 3 Good 3 High 3 Good 3 Low 2 Excellent 3 High 3 Good 3 Very low 2 Fair 2 High 3 Excellent 3 High 3 Good 3 Low 2 Good 3 Low 2 Good 3 Low 2 Good 3 Low 2 Good 3 High 3 Good 3 High3 Good 3 High 3 Good 3 High 3 Good 3 High 3 Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) Critical Root Zone(CRZ) Level of Encro Longitude Latitude -122.7899 45.42936 -122.7897 45.42937 24 12 -122.7899 45.4293 5 2.5 -122.79 45.42942 39 19.5 Moderate (10 -122.79 45.42935 17 8.5 -122.7894 45.42953 19 9.5 -122.7894 45.42949 8 4 -122.7894 45.42946 8 4 -122.7894 45.42938 10 5 -122.7894 45.42936 12 6 -122.7896 45.42946 29 14.5 -122.7895 45.42946 33 16.5 -122.7895 45.42939 13 6.5 -122.7894 45.42928 14 7 -122.7894 45.42926 16 8 -122.7895 45.42931 5.66 2.83 -122.7896 45.42925 26 13 -122.7894 45.42958 5 2.5 -122.7894 45.42932 23 11.5 None -122.7895 45.42945 24.08 12.04 None -122.7899 45.42978 45 22.5 Minor(<10%) -122.7899 45.42976 36 18 Minor(<10%) -122.79 45.42974 45 22.5 Moderate (10 -122.79 45.42967 40 20 High (25%+) -122.79 45.42964 28 14 High (25%+) -122.79 45.4296 36 18 High (25%+) -122.79 45.42958. 36 18 High (25%+) -122.79 45.42954 45 22.5 High (25%+) -122.79 45.4295 15 7.5 None -122.7898 45.42974 10 5 Minor(<10%) -122.7897 45.42929 8 4 None -122.7896 45.42968 29 14.5 None -122.7897 45.42975 35 17.5 None -122.7896 45.42974 8 4 None -122.7896 45.42971 15 7.5 None -122.7895 45.42971 6 3 None -122.7895 45.42967 5.66 2.83 None -122.7895 45.42961 36 18 None -122.7894 45.42972 25 12.5 None -122.7894 45.42973 29 14.5 None -122.7894 45.42976 30 15 None -122.7894 45.42977 25 12.5 None -122.7894 45.42967