Loading...
Plans (98) 'C'tgli s . 2019 - CITY OF TIGARD 9800 SW North Dakota SUILUING DIVISION St. Tigard, OR 97223 JPM Crista A. -- 6' between rail posts; Drawing 1 of 4 10-July-2019 . �. � � bottom railing gap 4" Drawn By: Andrew Petrisor il i 1 i 1iii 1 INtifit, 42" or less; Rail pickets 4" Checked By: AP ' tVIIO C Elevation View Copyright©2012.All rights reserved. ; : """------* Notes 1. 4X10 PT Beams ' 2. 4X4 PT Posts ' 3. Concrete Footing 18x18x18" Xa6 � � » DE K 5.4EoE' I;T 4. 2X8 Joists 16"0C with ' ��r LUS28Z joist hanger N r. _ ,—2x E6t Sr:R s t3, 5. PC4Z Post Caps connects �, s ,TC: beam to the top of post ; 6. (2) Simpson SDS '/4"x4" to ' � � �_ secure ledger board @ 12"oc , M,�'D -12"to EA.END OF DECK 7 .�.. .�., . �^t/�i8�X Ara 8C^i�' . ABU44 Post Base _ 64- 6ItInT ,Lsa O. . 8. Two DTT1Z Tension Ties !oust ilin s One Close to Each End { f 1 •I , a t j f K T PER i.a4 01,_ C3" At'' Ystf LU52 HMR6 To cx ;+ +L� tb'�J.G:-- --- DEER 18x 18x 18" F . 1i i (2) icyIwo �AS re r Deep O��IC 'Cts ' __i___,4TO RIM,, - 0 Ar.sn rr, r..,. CITY OP TIGAR ) REVIEVv�D FOR CODE COMPLIANCE �� �:i► 51 Approved 6 : I -•rE .. OTC: I I • ...� �� ,. • ,`- ae , 9--- o n j 6 A Pcrmit#. Address: e�Rpp -�- (�G1<f1J4 31 7 8 Suite#: By: Date: 1-J7-1 q 4' 10' 2' From Beam to Edge of Deck 4"x4" PT Post Spaced 7' O.C. 2"x8" Joists 16" O.C. 16' JPM Crista A. Drawing 2 of 4 10-JuIv-2019 Drawn By: Andrew Petrisor Checked By: AP Copyright©2012. All rights reserved. -� Vii. Notes y 11_4, 81 4"x10" PT Beam 2"x8" Ledger Board 4' 10' Top View -,,,,,,, ,1,, tit;`, 0, . A 0., ,,.„,,,,j, 4 it 1,, ,v. a na JPM Crista A. Drawing 3 of 4 110-July-2019 Drawn By: Andrew Petrisor `� Checked By: AP :, , , , .Copyght©2012. All rights reseed. ;, Notes ,fi ., .' „,,,,,,,,l' I 'II''t 4't 4.,,-- \\ , I , tit` q k i ,✓,;+.,.�^ 3D View G GENERAL NOTES `s > 9 'a--r; SCOPE c, o m � � SINGLE LEVEL EXTERIOR DECKS ATTACHED TO r r a E co a THE EXTERIOR WALL OFA ONE-OR TWO-FAMILY k o y DWELLING. v 2019 APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE . ,, ''.,,--...,;: ---::;,-.1--:`,1--:7- r 2017 OREGON RESIDENTIAL SPECIALTY CODE n CITY' IvE ,, (ORSC). LIMITATIONS OF USE €",,� ----- USE OF AND ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THESE ` ��""" READY-BUILD PLANS IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW ED � ' ji..111),1:11,11111111 , ! ,� yAND APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT � ��I)��� (��I� II "'"r. - HAVING JURISDICTION. „, ` �' A. ULTIMATE WIND SPEED:105-135MPH .,,...;;;..?:;;:a::::::` ,.- ,. `111 B. WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY:B,C,ORD .,-0--.1---7:-''-i-----7:-'2:---:::, ;.. C. SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY:C,D,,OR D2 (� D. GROUND SNOW LOAD:<40 PSF W * � .. % %,/ DECKS SUPPORTING LARGE CONCENTRATED Q = LOADS SUCH AS HOT TUBS ARE BEYOND THE cC 0 0 .}' u ,�"• � I.I SCOPE OF THIS DOCUMENT. cC W I I APPLICANT SHALL USE THE CODE PRESCRIBED z �'a 1"" 's" 11 ,2_,..' TABLES CONTAINED HEREIN AND RECORD 0 THEIR PROJECT SPECIFIC DESIGN PARAMETERS 0 CL 1 , °�„�a r '�'"'-'a,.. I;. i J � � I ��•+ ,,�� (❑X )ON SHEET S12 PRIOR TO PERMIT i,, h € .a � -i i APPLICATION. m /Le N 't-1',i1 i,'1i : I, '!.' LI I �iI';-' � FOUNDATION Q CO;3; ;#;! FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR ON NATIVE,INORGANIC, w vI `M —1.i.'t, ',, I'a°` L ; T ?.? UNDISTURBED SOIL BELOW EXISTING GRADE. cK W i% .�i•��i' CONCRETE STRENGTH SHALL BE 3,000 PSI INCe i k MODERATE WEATHERING REGIONS AND 3,500 Cl— Alike III A III . . `.. ,, PSI IN SEVERE WEATHERING REGIONS(SEE ;. 44 $41DETAIL 1/S11)[R301.2 AND R402.21. " , , WOOD FRAMING !''''''''''r" as '' '' ALL WOOD SHALL BE APPROVED NATURALLY , �a -I € ,, I DURABLE OR PRESSURE-PRESERVATIVE- ,z� t, , ."` � TREATED(R317.1). ALL WOOD IN CONTACT WITH � - r .r.'-1,-. 4-' g ~ :� t `' THE GROUND,OR EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE EFFECTIVE d- , SHALL BE APPROVED PRESSURE- MARCH,2018 ��I. g ,i i . , " , PRESERVATIVE-TREATED WOOD SUITABLE FOR REVISIONS Ya , ‘,...:;:',,:',,,',1,T, � � � LEGEND: GROUND CONTACT USE(R317.1.2). ALL CUTSM awNO. DATE " f ' �''° -,�"❑ SHALL BE FIELD TREATED WITH COPPER � '-'.*.;''',40.'-'!:::-';'" �' � �„�� �� a .r��' � �� X =PROJECT SPECIFIC ?4 4* � ' DECK COMPONENT NAPHTHENATE(2%COPPER)[R402.1.2). " " ,, 11 , .' DESIGN PARAMETER TO ti BE PROVIDED BY FASTENERS,ANCHORS,AND CONNECTORS FASTNERS SHALL BE HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED, APPLICANT ON SHEET S12 STAINLESS STEEL,OR APPROVED FOR USE [RXXX.X]=2017 ORSC WITH PRESERVATIVE-TREATED LUMBER. General Notes SECTION REFERENCE COATING TYPES FOR FRAMING ANCHORS SHALL APPROVED=ACCEPTABLE BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MFR'S ` TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL RECOMMENDATIONS(SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 1 General Notes [R202] SUBMITTAL)[R317.3]. SO1 NTS SO1 L .Q AG C 0 b m < 0 E c 0 @$ i° `h ami z c� c e ' v- Ym I; el6 'D EXTERIOR WALL NOTE:THE FLOOR JOISTS SHALL BE RUNNING PERPENDICULAR TO THE BAND JOIST AS SHOWN. /GUARD OPENINGS ❑H GUARD(DETAIL 1/SOS) WHEN JOISTS ARE SHALL NOT ALLOW RUNNING PARALLEL,A THE PASSAGE OF A DESIGN AND DETAILING 4"DIAMETER OF THE LATERAL LOAD SPHERE[R312.1.3] CONNECTION IN V ACCORDANCE WITH y = y `-�^ w ��1� Q W ACCEPTED ENGINEERING 0 PRACTICE SHALL BE `: CI DECKING(DETAIL 4/S05) O SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. 0 cc 1.11 0 , . . i.,. . . . . > g • • � 1— o • • o a N— NOTE:BAND JOIST F LEDGER(DETAIL 3/SO4) D �/ -1\ SHALL BE A MINIMUM 2x ❑ m LL N NOMINAL SOLID-SAWN 0ORA 1x9-1/2 ACTUAL ©BEAM(DETAIL 2/SO4) j,r, 0 JOIST G LAMINATED VENEER w W LUMBER(LVL)[R507.2.2] ©LATERAL LOAD CONNECTION MEMBER. OTHERWISE, (DETAIL 1/SO4) Ct A DESIGN AND / a DETAILING OF THE or ©JOIST SPAN,L LEDGER CONNECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ©JOIST CANTILEVER(L4/4 MAX) ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICE SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. EFFECTIVE FINISH GRADE(FOUNDATION EI POST MARCH,2018 CLEARANCES FROM SLOPES / ,- SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH / REVISIONS I SECTION R403.1.9) J( NO. DATE � I — I ! 1 - ❑E FOOTING F.. r (DETAIL 4/SO4) Elevation I - 1 I - 1 Side Elevation S02 NTS SO2 C s a 9 S :0:0, q • dpi, �� W p C at i u • Ali�' oiJit' AA 11,141..4 1 c! i . ..„'-.Is l'.11-:11 '1�j ��a, S0 . ._ 1 4) .....k..,, , ,i,./I _. il liI i II!!1' .f. /4.4.P li 1 it cc 5 CC , elly,i ,,::: .iii,:ill .........-: . .:..ir............. 44„ 1:1:4010.. il: .rte ,- 011W10:100,14...-,...... t � � �— lit..,..: i p i R al 8EAM SPAN,LB VP'. 11 :► t MLEVE ...dr..iii i 01111111110.1011 I -....•...t, —te m 8/4 AtAx) •101011111111.- SO4 > Wail SO4 < (n �—© W — SO4 C/ a. • • • H- 2 W 2 H- u) a Q EFFECTIVE f r' MARCH,2018 ��' V, ' REVISIONS s i ' ;x;";� NO. DATE wr : ' I Perspective a SO4 •-a•),•=A-4. 41,26„1„)).„mi.1 Deck Perspective S03 NTS S03 C lit CORROSION-RESISTANT �' m g 2> ! : -;' _.... FLASHING INSTALLED IN D DECK JOIST PER p' ? 6 m '�, SHINGLE-FASHION FOR ' s ,. DETAIL 1/S07,TYP r o e WATER TIGHTNESS ,: : .. �� ` a a Web � ro -' 3 o ,�`� �`' WHERE DECK MEETS '`` APPROVED JOIST TO U� I, �'• � EXTERIOR WALL , BEAM CONNECTOR s 6 A ] m . 11111111 � [R703.4 R507J . Dai6®� IR HOLD-DOWN DEVICE • [ ] n WITH MIN 750 LB. BEAM PLIES SHALL BE 0, CAPACITY AT 4 S FASTENED WITH(2) LOCATIONS,EVENLY ROWS OF 10D NAILS �� DISTRIBUTED ALONG MIN AT 16"O.C.ALONG DECK AND ONE WITHIN 24" EACH EDGE[R507.6] ® OF EACH END OF THE • • "'"°`71,1 � LEDGER. DEVICE SHALL ©DECK BEAM PER �� BE INSTALLED IN DETAIL 1/S09 y � '111111111Li ----- ,_"...-..,"......„.-.4111.11%k„. ..,..c,,,,,, ;+ ACCORDANCE WITH �� �„. _- MANUFACTURER'S ',„,i--'4%,,,,,--;-',,,-,,;‘ `APPROVED BEAM TO V �. RECOMMENDATIONS s �. 1 ! °POST CONNECTOR ((� = "! [R507.2.4].SEE DETAIL � � ' j 4 „ [R507.7.1].SEE DETAIL 2/S06 FOR ALTERNATE �� 3/S06 FOR ALTERNATE C7 i ,,,, CONNECTION v......._'.' � CONNECTION W `` ,,� - 5r ©DECK JOIST PER DECK POST PER z DETAILQ ,� ���_, � 2/S07 r DETAIL 2/S09 J I-'-, O 1 Lateral load connection 2 Joist to beam and beam to post connection o � h. SO4 NTS SO4 NTS m (7c,-). a Q DECK POST PER o V '� �©LATERAL LOAD DETAIL 2/S09 w W " ,,a- _°,,CONNECTION PER DETAIL � �� 1/SO4 OR 21S06 APPROVED POST TO W/ FOOTING CONNECTOR z n i FLASHING BETWEEN DECK INSTALLED IN a `"z y " �o AND EXTERIOR WALL PER ACCORDANCE WITH �' :DETAIL 1/SO4 MFR'S INSTRUCTIONS ':::-iiimima-- -::,- �� 1R507.8.1] ,::-,, DECK LEDGER FINISH 11 .. ® � v FASTENING PER DETAILS GRADE 1111 i 1/S08 AND 2/S08, ,,_: ® € G STAGGERED AS SHOWN EFFECTIVE ` II MARCH,2018 U1, IIII °° w APPROVED JOIST HANGER M:2111il' �C� REVISIONS z X X WITH DEPTH NOT LESS H NO. DATE �'`" " THAN 60%OF JOIST DEPTH a Opp [R507.7 AND R507.5.1] z o Ti 111 LEDGER z z zzz Ozz FASTENER 2 ['DECK LEDGER(2x8 0 Y SPACING PER MINIMUM)PER DETAIL LL U NOTE:SEE DETAIL DETAIL1/S08 N N N 1/S12 EQUAL TO OR ©�O 4/S06 FOR GREATER THAN THE DECK J 17 ALTERNATE POST Details TO FOOTING JOIST DEPTH EE CONNECTIONS PER 1/S10FOOTINGSIZE 3 Ledger connection 4 Post to footing connection SO4 SO4SO4 NTS NTS e -�'� ' 2X6 OR 5/4 BOARD RAIL G 2> 6'-0"MAX POST SPACING " '" CAP ATTACHED TO a E O EACH POST WITH(3)16D m ` c,. : _ ••'r , SCREWS #10X3"WOOD •m — o 0 ' II NAILS OR g o 1 1 r N. 2X2 BALUSTERS r.m' ,- m - ATTACHED AT TOP AND 2 a Z`• NO $ r,1 A '" BOTTOM WITH(2)8D mi. 2 csi • ,? r f 0 , a a NAILS OR(1)#8x2-1/2" M co cK -� ' , ° , $ ik A ,MIN WOOD SCREW !11 !III ��� 111 FASTEN RIM JOIST TO _ END OF EACH JOIST _.—:—:—:�;_ ■ .0:44,••• 'WITH(3)10DNAILS OR ' •..-- �� '#10x3"WOOD SCREWS —4- © 4= • ® iil p . .• ' [R507.5.1] 4X4 GUARD POSTS W 2"MIN- _L SEE DETAIL 2/S05 Q JOIST SIZE OPENINGS SHALL ® GUARD POST cr 0 NOT ALLOW THE 2X4 TOP AND BOTTOM • ATTACHMENT PER 0 12X8 =3 1/4" PASSAGE OF A 4" ATTACHED TO EACH POST • DETAILS 1/S05&3/S05wCD 2X10=5" DIAMETER SPHERE WITH(2)8D NAILS OR(2) • Z 2X12=5" [R312.1.3] #8X3"WOOD SCREWS • DECKING PER Q i- O DETAIL 4/S05 ELI 1 Deck guard 2 Deck guard o CL J ZS S05 NTS S05 NTS m Ce N N V [V CO RIM JOIST i W ® Q DECKING PER DETAIL C/ UNDERSIDE OF DECKING 1/S07 HOLD-DOWN DEVICES ® FASTEN DECKING TO I AF FRLOMIGNED GUARDA POSTSJOIST TO EACH JOIST WITH(2)8D THREADED NAILS OR(2) WITH MIN 1800 LB. ® #8 SCREWS[R507.4] hi '-- 2-4,.1!••• '=e� CAPACITY EACH, INSTALLED IN 4' ACCORDANCE WITH EFFECTIVE MFR'S INSTRUCTIONS. ® MARCH,2018 THE THROUGH BOLTS AND WASHERS SHALL REVISIONS BE CENTERED ON THE NO. DATE GUARD POSTS AND ® 1/8"PARALLEL GAP ' i SPACED AS SHOWN IN RECOMMENDED DETAIL 1/S05. DECKING MEMBERS FOR DECK JOIST px DRAINAGE AND TO REDUCE WARPING • GUARD POST 1,,,,_ Details 3 Guard post to joist connection 4 Decking connection S05 NTS S05 NTS S05 C ... .- ,aM.,.,« O GUARD POST < O H � N IN c > • FLOOR SHEATHING NAILING g` $ �� AT 6 0.C.TO JOIST WITH a ° E o v„ HOLD-DOWN DEVICES HOLD-DOWN A c ��w '� FROM GUARD POSTS TO w - •• ' ALIGNED BLOCKING AND ''' e o • • / FROM ALIGNED BLOCKING .. "` Y m r TO ADJACENT JOIST WITH o 4 •• 3" ` MIN 1800 LB.CAPACITY s i EACH,INSTALLED IN `. ACCORDANCE WITH MFR'S .....,;_,..-I.,. U1111111111.1THROINSTRUGH BOLCTIONS.LSI.. .J WASHERS SHALL BE•� CENTERED ON THE GUARD ��� � �\ POSTS AND SPACED AS •------.;._' ' 9=s Vt.:- SHOWN IN DETAIL 1/S05. R V `�HOLD-DOWN S OR SIMILAR FROM2017 ORSC ATTACH ALIGNED TENSION DEVICES tr. lir BLOCKING TO JOISTS WITH FIGURE R507.2.3(1) > CONNECTING ALIGNED DECK j' rt 0 (2)10d THREADED NAILS (JOIST TO FLOOR JOIST O VIEW FACING 4 OR WOOD SCREWS EACH NOTE:HOLD-DOWN TENSION DEVICES PER THIS DETAIL SHALL HAVE '°OPPOSITE SIDE END ` OF BLOCKING GUARD POST 1,500 LB.MINIMUM CAPACITY,BE INSTALLED IN NOT LESS THAN TWO Q C co LOCATIONS,AND BE WITHIN 24 INCHES OF EACH END OF DECK. a I— O aGuard post to blockin. connection 2 Alternate deck attachment for lateral loads 0 a. r- S06 NTS S06 NTS mJ No } U w 2-1/2"MIN W 4 l a • 6X6 MINIMUM POST SIZE � w� ��_- -� I — I - I - 1 zw� I – I – I – • -ia- CO I- - ..- --'__- -'–'"Z-‘ r� Oo-< EFFECTIVE (2)1/2"DIAMETER p w MARCH,2018 THROUGH-BOLTS WITH i - J REVISIONS WASHERS NO. DATE • FROM 2017 ORSC FIGURE R507.8.1 NOTE:POSTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED TO PREVENT LATERAL DISPLACEMENT AT THE BOTTOM OF SUPPORT. SUCH RESTRAINT SHALL NOTCH IN POST FOR BEAM BE PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURED CONNECTORS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS OR A MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT OF 12 INCHES IN SURROUNDING SOILS OR Details FROM 2017 ORSC FIGURE R507.7.1 CONCRETE. NOTE:ALL BOLTS SHALL HAVE WASHERS UNDER THE HEAD AND NUT. 3 Alternate beam to post connection 4 Alternate post to footing connections S06 NTS S06 NTS S06 • ,2 FROM 2017 ORSC TABLE R507.4 ca- s o JOIST SPACING . 0 E MAXIMUM ON-CENTER JOIST SPACING(in.) ta g o DECKING TYPE AND -- a `r aU NOMINAL SIZE :,to joist Diagonal to joists ^m 5/4-inch-thick wood 16 12 s 2-inch-thick wood 24 16 Plastic compositeb Per decking manufacturer Per decking manufacturer a.Maximum angle of 45 degrees from perpendicular for wood deck boards. b.Plastic composite deck materials shall comply with the requirements of ASTM D7032 and Section R507.3. V 1 Maximum Joist Spacing Table(from 2017 ORSC Table R507.4) Q W S07 NTS 0 in o a > tU Q I- O o_ 0 0. ti J ......1 n/ O N JOIST SPANS, L,,(ft.-in.) op LL} o 0 SPACING OF DECK JOISTS WITH NO CANTILEVERb SPACING OF DECK JOISTS WITH CANTILEVER w W SPECIESa SIZE (in.) (in.) WI 12 16 24 12 16 24 n. 2x6 9-6 8-8 7-2 6-3 6-3 6-3 Douglas Fir- 2x8 12-6 11-1 9-1 9-5 9-5 9-1 Larch,Hem-Fir, Spruce-Pine-Fir 2x10 15-8 13-7 11-1 13-7 13-7 11-1 EFFECTIVE 2x12 18-0 15-9 12-10 18-0 15-9 12-10 MARCH,2018 2x6 8-10 8-0 7-0 5-7 5-7 5-7 REVISIONS NO. DATE Redwood, 2x8 11-8 10-7 8-8 8-6 8-6 8-6 Western Cedars, Ponderosa Pine, 2x10 14-11 13-0 10-7 12-3 12-3 10-7 Red Pine 2x12 17-5 15-1 12-4 16-5 15-1 12-4 a.No.2 grade. Tables b.Cantilevered spans not exceeding the nominal depth of the joist are considered"with no cantilever"for this table. 2 Maximum Joist Spans Table From(from 2017 ORSC Table R507.5) S07 NTS .7�+ • 07 C O 0 > LEDGER CONNECTION TO BAND JOISTa o o m o JOIST SPAN(ft.),Lio a co o CONNECTION DETAILS f a .5- <6 <8 < 10 < 12 <_ 14 < 16 < 18 ON-CENTER SPACING OF FASTENERS(in.) s 1/2-inch diameter lag screw with 1/2- 30 23 18 15 13 11 10 inch maximum sheathing c 1/2-inch diameter through bolt with 1/2- 36 36 34 29 24 21 19 inch maximum sheathing` 1/2-inch diameter through bolt with 1- 36 36 29 24 21 18 16 inch maximum sheathings a.Ledgers shall be flashed with approved corrosion-resistant flashing applied shingle-fashion in a manner to prevent entry of water into the wall cavity or 2 W penetration of water to the building structural framing components in accordance with Section R703.4. Q Q b.The tip of the lag screw shall fully extend beyond the inside face of the band joist. 0 c.Sheathing shall be wood structural panel or solid sawn lumber. d.Sheathing shall be permitted to be wood structural panel,gypsum board,fiberboard,lumber,or foam sheathing.Up to 1/2-inch thickness of stacked 0 W rU washers shall be permitted to substitute for up to 1/2-inch of allowable sheathing thickness where combined with wood structural panel or lumber sheathing. Z g I-- o a Q. N- 1 Minimum Ledger Connection Table(from 2017 ORSC Table R507.2) o S08 NTS m CV } V o re W Q! Q. PLACEMENT OF LAG SCREWS AND THROUGH BOLTS IN LEDGERS AND BAND JOISTS MINIMUM END AND EDGE DISTANCES AND SPACING BETWEEN ROWS (in.) EFFECTIVE TOP EDGE BOTTOM EDGE CUT ENDS ROW SPACING MARCH.2018 REVISIONS LEDGER' 2s 3/4 2b 1 5/8b NO. DATE • BAND JOIST` 3/4 2 2b 1 5/8b a.Lag screws or bolts shall be staggered from the top to the bottom along the horizontal run of the deck ledger in accordance with detail 3/SO4. b.Maximum of 5 inches. c.For engineered rim joists,the manufacturer's recommendations shall govern. Tables d.The minimum distance from bottom row of lag screws or bolts to the top edge of the ledger shall be in accordance with detail 3/SO4. 2 Ledger Fasteners Placement Table(from 2017 ORSC Table R507.2.1) S08 NTS S08p C o . BEAM SPANS', LB (ft.-in.) . t,t, s o o co 0, C 0 C Eo DECK JOIST SPAN,LJ,(ft.) &v t, " 8 SPECIESb SIZE =e s A 0 q_a i ',.,',--E <6 <8 <_10 <12 <14 516 <1822 a �a 3x6 or 2-2x6 5-5 4-8 4-2 3-10 3-6 3-1 2-9 3x8 or 2-2x8 6-10 5-11 5-4 4-10 4-6 4-1 3-8 3x10 or 2-2x10 8-4 7-3 6-6 5-11 5-6 5-1 4-8 3x12 or 2-2x6 9-8 8-5 7-6 6-10 6-4 5-11 5-7 4x6 6-5 5-6 4-11 4-6 4-2 3-11 3-8 Douglas Fir-Larch, Hem- (.) Fir,Spruce-Pine-Fir, 4x8 8-5 7-3 6-6 5-11 5-6 5-2 4-10Q W Redwood,Western < Q Cedars,Ponderosa Pine, 4x10 9-11 8-7 7-8 7-0 6-6 6-1 5-8 0 Red Pine c[ lill 4x12 11-5 9-11 8-10 8-1 7-6 7-0 6-7 0- cn 3-2x6 7-4 6-8 6-0 5-6 5-1 4-9 4-6 6 0 o CL 3-2x8 9-8 8-6 7-7 6-11 6-5 6-0 5-8 - - o cc N 3-2x10 12-0 10-5 9-4 8-6 7-10 7-4 6-11 >- 0 o < CO 3-2x12 13-11 12-1 10-9 9-10 9-1 8-6 8-1 t W a.Beams supporting deck joists from one side only(with optional joist cantilever). Ct b.No.2 grade. 0- c.Beam depth shall be greater than or equal to depth of joists with a flush beam condition. 1 Maximum Beam Spans Table(from 2017 ORSC Table R507.6) S09 NTS POST HEIGHT EFFECTIVE SPECIESb DECK POST SIZE HEIGHT'(ft) MARCH,2018 REVISIONS Douglas Fir-Larch,Hem-Fir, 4x4 8 NO. DATE Spruce-Pine-Fir,Redwood, Western Cedars,Ponderosa 4x6 8 Pine, Red Pine 6x6 14 a.Measured to the underside of the beam. Tables b.No.2 grade. 2 Maximum Post Height Table (from 2017 ORSC Table R507.8) S09 NTS S09 G O 0 ] FOOTING DIMENSIONS' AF BEAM SPAN(ft),LB JOIST SPAN(ft.),Lj ROUND FOOTING SQUARE FOOTING WIDTH MINIMUM FOOTING u p t "' 8 DIAMETER(in.) (in.) THICKNESSb(in.) 8 e a 'T a o sem' t r> c al scn.s1 < 10 18 16 8 <6 < 14 21 19 8 <_ 18 24 • 21 10 <_ 10 20 18 8 <8 < 14 24 22 10 < 18 27 24 11 < 10 23 20 9 2 W < 10 <ct Q <_ 14 27 24 11 < 12 < 10 25 22 10 a W C) <_ 14 < 10 27 24 11 /I-. O d o a.Assumes 1,500 psf soil bearing capacity per Section R401.4.1. 5 o b.In accordance with Section R403.1.4,footings shall be placed not less than 12 inches below the finished grade on undisturbed ground surface and shall m (V extend below the frost line depth specified in Table R301.2(1).Coordinate footing thickness with post base manufacturer installation instructions. >- V w ix LU 1 Minimum Footing Sizes Table(Ref 2017 ORSC Section R403) CC S10 NTS CL EFFECTIVE MARCH,2018 REVISIONS NO. DATE Tables Sb0 2017 ORSC TABLE R301.2(1) CLIMATIC AND GEOGRAPHIC DESIGN CRITERIA9,h 2, E GROUND SNOW 0 COUNTY ULTIMATE DESIGN SEISMIC DESIGN SUBJECT TO DAMAGE m c o LOADa=36 psf WIND SPEED CATEGORY Weatheringd Frost line depth(inches) Decay E.4.) M m Baker 3,200 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight e ` v o Benton 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate 'o .. © 2 Clackamas 500 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate 5,W ° r S Clatsop 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate o Columbia 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate ° Coos 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate Crook 4,100 Note b Note c Severe 18 Slight Curry 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate Deschutes 4,000 Note b Note c Severe 18 Slight Douglas 1,500 Note b Note c Moderate 18 Moderate Gilliam 3,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Moderate 5.45.5°N Note b Note c N.45.5°N Note b Note c Grant 4,100 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight Harney 4,100 Note b Note c Severe 24 Moderate 3• Hood River Note e Note b Note c Severe 24 Moderate U Jackson 2,000 Note b Note c Moderate 16 Slight 2 Jefferson 4,100 Note b Note c Severe 18 Moderate < Q Josephine 4,100 Note b Note c Moderate 181 Moderate Klamath 4,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Moderate 0 Lake 4,200 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight Lane 500 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate d > Z CD Lincoln 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate < L Linn 700 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate --I 0 a Malheur 3,400 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight O a N" Marion 500 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate J_ i�.N Morrow 3,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight 5 O 5.45.5°N CO N Note b Note c ' N.45.5°N Note b Note c >. v O Multnomah 500 Note b Note c Moderate 18 Moderate < U)V, Polk 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate WEx W Sherman 2,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight AN/ S.45.51,1 Note b Note c Ce N.45.5°N Note b Note cCL Tillamook 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate Umatilla 3,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight S.45.5°N Note b Note c N.45.5°N Note b Note c Union 3,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight Wallowa 3,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight Wasco 2,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight S.45.5°N Note b • Note c N.45.5°N Note b Note c EFFECTIVE Washington 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate MARCH,2016 Wheeler 4,100 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight Yamhill 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate REVISIONS NO. DATE a.For locations with elevation higher than the listed values or for a possible reduction in minimum design roof snow load from 25 psf to 20 psf,refer to the Snow Load Analysis for Oregon(including the ground snow load maps)published by the Structural Engineers Association of Oregon in 2007,in conjunction with the 2010 Oregon Snow Load Map update and Interim Guidelines for Snow Load Determination for the State of Oregon,published in 2011. b.Refer to Figure R301.2(4)for mapped Ultimate Design Wind Speeds.Wind exposure category shall be determined on a site-specific basis in accordance with Section R301.2.1.4. c.Refer to Figure R301.2(2)for mapped Seismic Design Categories. d.A severe classification is where weather conditions result in significant snowfall combined with extended periods during which there is little or not natural thawing causing de-icing salts to be used extensively. e.For elevations below 500 feet,the ground snow load is 50 psf.Above 500 feet,see Note a. Tables f.The frost line depth below 2,500 feet in Jackson and Josephine Counties is 12 inches. g.See Section R301.2 and R322 for establishment of flood hazard design criteria. doh.See Section R327 for establishment of wildfire hazard design criteria. Climatic and Geographic Criteria By County NTS S 1 1 c o i 0 C o EA E DECKING FR507.41: o ° o cm size: I 2x<-0five-quarter f. m material: Opreservative-treated Oplastic composite Ei turally durable (e.g. cedar) orientation: C3p'erpendicular to joists ❑diagonal to joists m 'A I N 2 ©JOISTS [R507.51: size: 02x6 E92`x8 02x10 1:12x12 spacing: 012 in. lain. 024 in. span, L,,: ft. - in. cantilever: Z ft. - in. (Lj/4 MAX) rim joist: 02x6 IX8 02x10 ❑2x12 ❑not applicable ©BEAMS [R507.61: U plies: 01 02 03 Q W size: 02x6 02x8 02x10 02x12 04x6 04x8 0 D4x12 ❑ x Q span, Le: ft. - in. o cantilever: ft. - in. (LB/4 MAX) a j co jD POSTS [R507.81: a F" O size: 9(x4 04x6 06x6 ❑ x 4. `� height: ft. - in. m R o N } U EQ FOOTINGS 1R507.8.11: Q Cl) size: 142, in. ❑square mound it W thickness: in. ec a. F❑LEDGER FR507.21: size: 0.2X8 122x10 02x12 fastener: 01/2"through-bolt 63.172" lag screw a.,ude-compliant alternate (attach report) fastener spacing: in. on-center © LATERAL LOAD CONNECTION 1R507.2.41: EFFECTIVE MARCH,2018 0(4)750 pound hold-down tension devices (detail 1/SO4) 0(2) 1,500 pound hold-down tension devices (detail 2/S06) REVISIONS Ocode-compliant alternate (attach report) NO. DATE HQ GUARDRAIL POST ATTACHMENT FR301.51: Odetails 1-3/S05& 1/S06 ❑code-compliant alternate (attach detail). Project Specific NOTE:THE PERMIT APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE PROJECT SPECIFIC DESIGN BY CHECKING THE APPLICABLE Information BOXES AND ENTERING THE APPROPRIATE INFORMATION ABOVE PRIOR TO PERMIT APPLICATION. Project Specific Information NTS S12