12/12/2018 - Packet City of Tigard
- Town Center Advisory Commission Agenda
MEETING DATE/TIME: December 12, 2018 — 6:30 to 8:25 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: Red Rock Creek Con£ Room, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223
1. CALL TO ORDER Kate 6:30
2. CONSIDER MINUTES Kate 6:35
3. PUBLIC COMMENT Kate 6:40
4. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Lori Faha 6:45
5. PLANNING FOR JANUARY GOAL SETTING MEETING Kate and Sean 7:15
6. TIGARD TRIANGLE DEEP DIVE PART 2 Sean 7:35
7. FANNO CREEK BREWPUB PUBLIC SPACE Sean 7:50
8. NOMINATIONS FOR 2019 TCAC OFFICERS Kate 8:00
9. LIAISON REPORTS Kate 8:10
10. NON-AGENDA ITEMS All 8:20
11. ADJOURN BUSINESS MEETING Kate 8:25
*EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Center Advisory Commission may go into Executive Session to discuss real property
transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660(2) (e).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the
Session.Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not
disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final
decision.Executive Sessions are closed to the public.
Upcoming meetings of note:
Tuesday,December 11,6:30 p.m.,TCDA meeting,Tigard Town Hall (contract approval)
Wednesday,January 9,Time TBD, TCAC Meeting and Goal Setting, Red Rock Creek
The City of Tigard tries to make all reasonable modifications to ensure that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity
to participate equally in all city meetings.
Upon request,the city will do its best to arrange for the following services/equipment:
• Assistive listening devices.
• Qualified sign language interpreters.
• Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Because the city may need to hire outside service providers or arrange for specialized equipment,those requesting
services/equipment should do so as far in advance as possible,but no later than 3 city work days prior to the meeting.To
make a request,call 503-718-2481 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD-Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
TOWN CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA— December 12, 2018
City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.dgard-or.gov I Page 1 oft
CITY OF TIGARD
TOWN CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes
December 12, 2018
Members Present: Carine Arendes, Chris Haedinger, Scott Hancock,Tom Murphy,Tim Myshak,
Gloria Pinzon Marin (Ex Officio), Kate Rogers (Chair), Ryan Ruggiero, and Faez Soud.
Members Absent: Lucas Brook (Vice Chair).
Staff Present: Redevelopment Project Manager Sean Farrelly, City Engineer Lori Faha, and
Administrative Specialist Joe Patton.
Others Present: Council TCAC Liaison Councilor John Goodhouse,Tigard residents Angeline
Chong and Hemendra Mathur.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Rogers called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. The meeting was held in the Red Rock Creek
Conference Room, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Joe recorded the roll call.
2. CONSIDER MINUTES
The November 14, 2018 TCAC Minutes were unanimously approved with Commissioner Arendes
abstaining.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT—N/A.
4. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Lori gave a brief overview of the six-year CIP process for projects over$50,000. Each year cost
estimates are reevaluated based on construction costs at that time and contingencies are built in. If
costs increase above the budgeted level staff must go back to Council to either delay construction or
ask for additional funding. The URD projects were briefly discussed.
5. PLANNING FOR JANUARY GOAL SETTING MEETING
Commissioners agreed to meet earlier and stay longer for the January 9, 2019 meeting to
accommodate the goal setting. Commissioners discussed methods of setting goals. Kate will arrange
for a meeting room at the Library for Commissioners wanting to take part in planning before the
January meeting.
6. TIGARD TRIANGLE DEEP DIVE PART 2
Sean discussed existing conditions in the Triangle including right-of-way conditions, topography,
missing sidewalks, surface parking locations,wetlands, creeks, and sites without centralized sewer.
7. FANNO CREEK BREWPUB PUBLIC SPACE
Sean noted that the Main Street Village Apartments owners have agreed to sell some of their
property to be used to widen the south driveway of Max's Brewpub. The owners of the Brewpub
property still need to agree to the plan which would close the north driveway and redeveloping it as
public space along Fanno Creek.
Page 1 of 2
TOWN CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION
December 12, 2018
8. NOMINATIONS FOR 2019 TCAC OFFICERS
Kate was nominated as Chair and Lucas as Vice Chair. It was noted that nominations are open until
the elections.
9. LIAISON REPORTS
Carine attended the TTAC meeting and they will be discussing a Complete Streets Policy in 2019.
The Equitable Housing grant is continuing to fund activities related to the SWC including education
for youths about the project.
10. NON-AGENDA ITEMS
Sean announced the gateway sculptures will be repainted and a sub-committee will be formed to
determine the color. Canine was recognized for her service on CCAC/TCAC as her term ends
December 31 and she will be a member of TTAC next year.
11. ADJOURN BUSINESS MEETING
The meeting adjourned at 8:45 pm.
wfwf�_
JoeYatton,TCAC Meeting Secretary
Kate Rogers, Ch
Page 2of2
Supplement to minutes
From: Ryan Ruggiero <rcruggiero@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 7:55 AM
To: Sean Farrelly
Cc: Carine Arendes; chris@beachhutdeli.com; Soud, Faez; Gloria Pinzon Marin (Gloria.pinzon@live.com);
Joe Patton; Kate Rogers; Kenny Asher; Lucas Brook; Scott Hancock;Tim Myshak;Tom Murphy
Subject: Re: TCAC Packet- November 14
Hello TCAC commissioners- I'm sorry I won't be joining you this evening at what looks to be a very interesting and
educational meeting.
Here is a brief report from last night's sparsely attended PRAB meeting:
1. Anthony Markey,the City's Recreation Coordinator, has left the City due to recent and pending cuts to the recreation
program budget. Another staff person is picking up some of the slack left by Anthony's vacancy.
2. Most of the meeting focused on finances, with a presentation by Toby LaFrance,the City's finance director.
• The City recently updated the way it allocates indirect (admin) costs across City departments, and that resulted
in some savings to Parks and Rec, but those funds will go back into the general fund.
• The recreation program budget($430,000) is currently made up of the Parks and Rec Fee (PARF) utility bills
(30%) and general funds (70%).A PARF increase of$1.10 per month per household would result in the entire
recreation program being funded through the PARF and 0%from the general fund. An additional $0.35 per
month per household would restore pre-cut funding levels, again entirely through the PARF and 0%from the
general fund. City Council can decide to do this without voter approval. Something along these lines will be
discussed at their joint meeting with City Council next week.
Park development updates:
• Fanno Creek re-alignment is essentially done, with just planting remaining to be done. If you haven't seen it
recently, it's worth a quick walk from Main St or Ash.
• Fanno Creek at Tiedeman bridge project is expected to be done early in 2018.
• Dirksen improvements are mostly done.
• Lots of Fanno Creek Trail work is ongoing and will continue well into 2019.
Thanks,
Ryan
Supplement to minutes
From: Carine Arendes <carinearendes@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 5:21 PM
To: Lucas Brook; chris@beachhutdeli.com; Ralph Hancock; Gloria Pinzon Marin (Gloria.pinzon@live.com);
Tom Murphy; Tim Myshak; Kate Rogers; Ryan Ruggiero; Faez Soud
Cc: Sean Farrelly;Joe Patton
Subject: City Council Meeting Tonight on SW Corridor&Oct/Nov Southwest Corridor project update
Hi All-
See below for the latest from Metro on the SW Corridor Light Rail project and come out tonight
for City Council briefing
Metro is now recruiting for a community advisory group to assist with a new phase in the SW
Corridor light rail project, the Project Development phase. It is anticipated to be a two-year
commitment beginning January 2019. Three to five hours per month, including a standing 90-
minute meeting (evenings first Thursday of most months). Meetings will include food and transit
passes for members.
To participate, applicants should be identify as one or more of the following kind of stakeholders
in the community: people who live or work or own property/small business in the SW Corridor,
or represent a major employer or institution in SW Corridor; people who are students at a SW
Corridor college or university, self-identify as a person with a disability, person of color, or as an
Elder; or people who are transit riders, pedestrians and bicycle riders and advocates.
People who have expertise or experience as an advocate in the following areas are encouraged
to apply: people with disabilities, communities of color, low-income people and affordable
housing; as well as experts in freight mobility, environmental and sustainability issues, and
planning/urban design/transit-oriented development. Additionally, representatives from
neighborhood associations or other organizations are welcome to apply.
Interested parties need to submit a completed application form by December 7, 2018.
Cheers,
CA
Carine Arendes
503-619-5489
(text)
---------- Forwarded message---------
From: Southwest Corridor Plan<swcorridorplan@oregonmetro.gov>
Date: Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 4:55 PM
Subject: Oct/Nov Southwest Corridor project update
To: Southwest Corridor Plan <swcorridorplan@oregonmetro.gov>
The Preferred Alternative recommended by the Southwest Corridor Steering Committee in August, has been
reviewed by several local jurisdictions and agencies in the past several weeks. The cities of Tualatin and
Beaverton, the Washington County Board of Commissioners and the TriMet Board have all endorsed the
Preferred Alternative. The Portland and Tigard city councils are scheduled to consider the recommendation
on Nov. 1 and Nov. 13, respectively.
Want to help shape the project on a Community Advisory Committee?
As the project moves from a broader planning process into a more detailed design phase, a new Community
Advisory Committee (CAC) will be formed to advise the project staff and steering committee for
approximately two years of project development. CAC details and application.
Upcoming Metro Council actions
On November 15, 2018 at 2 p.m., the Metro Council will consider adding the Preferred Alternative light rail
route to the Regional Transportation Plan. The Regional Transportation Plan is a blueprint to guide
transportation investments - motor vehicle, freight, transit, bicycle and walking - throughout the Portland
metropolitan region. You can send light rail preferred alternative testimony to:
Metro (Attention: Metro Council), 600 NE Grand Ave., Portland, OR 97232, or by email at
metrocouncilCoreonmetro.o,ov.
The Council will also consider adopting a land use final order for the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project. A
land use final order is a single land use permit for the proposed light rail line. Land use final orders have
been granted in the past for all MAX lines in the region. The new light rail line will still need to obtain
federal, state and local permits related to the design and construction of the project.
The order will establish the project improvements, including locations, for the proposed light rail line to
serve Southwest Portland, Tigard and Tualatin. Failure of a person to raise an issue before or at the hearing,
orally in person or in writing, will preclude appeals of the order. See the full notice for details. Send Land
Use Final Order testimony to:
Metro (Attention: Yuliya Lee), 600 NE Grand Ave., Portland, OR 97232, or by email at
LUFOCoregonmetro.gov.
AGENDA ITEM 4 CIP Projects in Downtown and Triangle
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - STREETS
95051-72nd Avenue/Tigard Triangle Transportation Study
Project Need:There are many transportation needs in the 72nd Avenue and Tigard Triangle areas and many ideas on how these needs
should be addressed.
Project Description:This study will determine the ultimate desired configuration of 72nd Avenue from Pacific Highway south to
Bonita Road.Existing issues in this area include poor walking and cycling conditions along 72nd Avenue,particularly in the Highway 217
interchange area and near Pacific Highway.Significant traffic congestion exists,primafdy on southbound 72nd Avenue through the
Highway 217 interchange.The study will take into account desires and products from the Tigard Triangle planning and code process,
current and future traffic data,Southwest Corridor/transit study input,as well as ODOT and other stakeholder input.The goal is to
create a walkable,bikeable,transit-oriented,livable,human-scale street cross section and intersection treatment that aligns with our
strategic vision,the Triangle Strategic Plan,and the Metro High Capacity Transit Southwest Corridor Land Use Plan.The product will
identify and provide conceptual level cost estimates for proposed improvements.
Project Results:A conceptual design of 72nd Avenue including the interchange at Highway 217.
Total Project Cost:$295,500
Actual
through Projected Project
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
EXPENSES
Internal Expenses
Project Alanagement 5,363 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 55,363
Total Internal 5,363 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 55,363
External Expenses
Design and Engineering 127 0 220,000 0 0 0 0 0 220,127
Contingency 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 20,000
Total External 127 0 240,000 0 0 0 0 0 240,127
Total Project Expense 5,490 0 290,000 0 0 0 0 0 295,490
REVENUES
Revenue Funding Source
200-Gas Tax Fund 5,490 0 290,000 0 0 0 0 0 295,490
Total Revenue Funding 5,490 0 290,000 0 0 0 0 0 295,490
Total Revenues 5,490 0 290,000 0 0 0 0 0 295,490
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 247
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - STREETS
97017-Main Street Green Street Retrofit(Phase 2)
Project Need:Complete the last phase of plain Street Green Street improvements.This phase is from the railroad tracks north to
Scoffins Street.
Project Description:The project will extend the improvements completed during Phase 1 to the improvements completed with the
Pacific Highway/Alain Street/Greenburg Road project.Improvements include new sidewalks,new asphaltic concrete and the
collection and treatment of stormwater runoff using low impact development approaches(EMA).
Project Results:With the completion of Phase 2,the entire length of Alain Street will be constructed with green street features.
Project Funding:Past budget documents showed that the city had Metro Transportation Improvement Program(AMP)grant monies
to help fund this project.These federal funds are being swapped with Triplet for a lower amount of non-federal funds,eliminating most
federal requirements and reviews. Additional funding is from city and state gas tax and urban renewal funds.
Total Project Cost:$2,558,000
City of Tigard Project Cost:$1,971,000
Actual
through Projected Project
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
EXPENSES
Internal Expenses
Project Management 13,207 0 40,000 100,000 50,000 0 0 0 203,207
Total Internal 13,207 0 40,000 100,000 50,000 0 0 0 203,207
External Expenses
Design and Engineering 179 0 230,000 440,000 0 0 0 0 670,179
Construction 0 0 0 930,000 429,424 0 0 0 1,359,424
Contingency 0 0 50,000 275,000 0 0 0 0 325,000
Total External 179 0 280,000 1,645,000 429,424 0 0 0 2,354,603
Total Project Expense 13,386 0 320,000 1,745,000 479,424 0 0 0 2,557,810
REVENUES
Revenue Funding Source
200-Gas Tax Fund 9,755 0 220,000 985,000 133,000 0 0 0 1,347,755
205-City Gas Tax Fund 979 0 100,000 460,000 62,000 0 0 0 622,979
Total Revenue Funding 10,734 0 320,000 1,445,000 195,000 0 0 0 1,970,734
Other Revenue Source
TriAlet 0 0 0 300,000 284,424 0 0 0 584,424
Urban Renewal Capital 2,652 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,652
Improvement
Total Other Revenue 2,652 0 0 300,000 284,424 0 0 0 587,076
Total Revenues 13,386 0 320,000 1,745,000 479,424 0 0 0 2,557,810
PAGE 252- CITY OF TIGARD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - STREETS
97017-Main Street Green Street Retrofit(Phase 2)
Project Need:Complete the last phase of plain Street Green Street improvements.This phase is from the railroad tracks north to
Scoffins Street.
Project Description:The project will extend the improvements completed during Phase 1 to the improvements completed with the
Pacific Highway/Alain Street/Greenburg Road project.Improvements include new sidewalks,new asphaltic concrete and the
collection and treatment of stormwater runoff using low impact development approaches(EMA).
Project Results:With the completion of Phase 2,the entire length of Alain Street will be constructed with green street features.
Project Funding:Past budget documents showed that the city had Metro Transportation Improvement Program(AMP)grant monies
to help fund this project.These federal funds are being swapped with Triplet for a lower amount of non-federal funds,eliminating most
federal requirements and reviews. Additional funding is from city and state gas tax and urban renewal funds.
Total Project Cost:$2,558,000
City of Tigard Project Cost:$1,971,000
Actual
through Projected Project
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
EXPENSES
Internal Expenses
Project Management 13,207 0 40,000 100,000 50,000 0 0 0 203,207
Total Internal 13,207 0 40,000 100,000 50,000 0 0 0 203,207
External Expenses
Design and Engineering 179 0 230,000 440,000 0 0 0 0 670,179
Construction 0 0 0 930,000 429,424 0 0 0 1,359,424
Contingency 0 0 50,000 275,000 0 0 0 0 325,000
Total External 179 0 280,000 1,645,000 429,424 0 0 0 2,354,603
Total Project Expense 13,386 0 320,000 1,745,000 479,424 0 0 0 2,557,810
REVENUES
Revenue Funding Source
200-Gas Tax Fund 9,755 0 220,000 985,000 133,000 0 0 0 1,347,755
205-City Gas Tax Fund 979 0 100,000 460,000 62,000 0 0 0 622,979
Total Revenue Funding 10,734 0 320,000 1,445,000 195,000 0 0 0 1,970,734
Other Revenue Source
TriAlet 0 0 0 300,000 284,424 0 0 0 584,424
Urban Renewal Capital 2,652 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,652
Improvement
Total Other Revenue 2,652 0 0 300,000 284,424 0 0 0 587,076
Total Revenues 13,386 0 320,000 1,745,000 479,424 0 0 0 2,557,810
PAGE 252- CITY OF TIGARD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - STREETS
95042-Commercial Street Sidewalk(Main to Lincoln)-TriMet
Project Need:Commercial Street currently lacks sidewalks west of Alain Street.This project will connect a large residential
neighborhood to downtown Tigard and the Tigard Transit Center.Rather high pedestrian volumes are observed despite the lack of
adequate pedestrian facilities.Commercial Street is particularly narrow under this reach of the Pacific Highway overcrossing.There is
also a lack of sidewalk along Pacific Highway between Naeve Street and Beef Bend Road.
Project Description:This project will construct a sidewalk along one side of Commercial Street from Main Street under the Pacific
Highway oveicrossing to Lincoln Avenue.The railroad and ODOT may dictate the location of the sidewalk,which could result in the
roadway being slightly shifted to the southwest so that the sidewalk can be added on the northeast side of the roadway.A pedestrian
path connecting Commercial Street to Center Street and sidewalk along the east side of Pacific Highway from Naeve Street to Beef Bend
Road will also be constructed.This is part of a larger Triniet-managed project to improve access to transit along the Pacific Highway
corridor.
Project Results:This project improves public safety and access to downtown,the transit center and along Pacific Highway.This project
supports the vision statement in the City of Tigard`s Strategic Plan:"The most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest..."
Project Funding:This project will be partially funded with the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program(STIP)Enhance
Project to be done cooperatively with Triplet.The project total is estimated to be approximately$2 million and the city s minimum
required match is$134,024.
Total Project Cost:$2,000,004
City of Tigard Project Cast:$211,040
Actual
through Projected Project
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
EXPENSES
Internal Expenses
Project Management 10,085 15,000 15,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 45,085
Total Internal 10,085 15,000 15,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 45,085
External Expenses
Design and Engineering 20,158 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,158
Construction 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 125,000
Contingency 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,000
Total External 24,158 145,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 165,158
Total Project Expense 30,243 160,000 15,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 210,243
REVENUES
Revenue Funding Source
200-Gas Tax Fund 3,916 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,916
205-City Gas Tax Fund 8,788 160,000 15,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 188,788
510-Stormwater Fund 17,539 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,539
Total Revenue Funding 30,243 160,000 15,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 210,243
Total Revenues 30,243 160,000 15,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 210,243
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 243
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PARKS
92028-Downtown Land Acquisition
Project Need:This funding can be used to identify,investigate and purchase park sites within the downtown area of Tigard.
Project Description:Part of the$17,000,000 Parks Bond was set aside to allow the purchase and development of parks within the
downtown area.
Project Results:Downtown property for parks purchased using funds from the citizen approved bond measure.
Total Project Cost: $1,285,000
Actual
through Projected Project
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
EXPENSES
External Expenses
Land/Right of Way 698 30,000 1,234,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,284,698
Acquisition
Total External 698 30,000 1,254,000 0 0 0 0 0 1284,698
Total Project Expense 698 30,000 1,254,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,284,698
REVENUES
Revenue Funding Source
421-Parks Bond Fund 698 30,000 1,254,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,284,698
Total Revenue Funding 698 30,000 1,254,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,284,698
Total Revenues 698 30,000 1254,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,284,698
t4
I
r`
�v
Main St. @ Tanno Concept-Potential design concept for a now vacant space on Main St, that
through a $400,000 EPA Brownfields grant will be cleaned up and redeveloped.
PAGE 266 - CITY OF TIGARD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PARKS
92034-Tigard Street Heritage Trail&Public Space(Tigard St./Main to Tiedeman)
Project Need:A safe,off-street biking and walking commuter route along Tigard Street from Alain Street to Tiedeman Avenue.
Project Description:The Tigard Street Heritage Trail uses a three-quarter-mile inactive rail corridor parallel to Tigard Street.The city
signed a lease for use of the corridor to design and construct a bike/pedestrian path and amenities.This project is related to a FY2016
Lighter Quicker Cheaper project which used porous paving material to create a pathway in advance of the full project.The temporary
porous asphalt will be replaced with a finished surface treatment,lighting,landscaping,fencing and cultural amenities as budget allows.
The trail is being designed to celebrate local heritage and act as a"pedestrian boulevard"with historic and cultural landmarks.
Project Results:The trail makes a connection to downtown Tigard and supports an emerging small plaza between the Tigard Chamber
of Commerce building and the rail line in downtown Tigard.At Grant Avenue,the trail will provide for a connection leading to the
Fanno Creek regional trail and Woodard Park.This project supports the vision statement in the City of Tigard's Strategic Plan:"The
most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest..."
Project Funding:The city was awarded a Connect Oregon VI Grant,which will fund the majority of the project.The grant will be
supplemented by a match from Washington County and city match from Parks System Development Charges(SDCs)and Urban
Renewal Funds.
Total Project Cost:$1,425,000
City of Tigard Project Cost:$245,000
Actual
through Projected Project
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
EXPENSES
Internal Expenses
Project Management 42,161 40,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 122,161
Total Internal 42,161 40,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 122,161
External Expenses
Public Involvement 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,000
Design and Engineering 105,855 125,000 55,000 ❑ 0 0 0 0 285,855
Construction 0 17,000 855,000 0 0 0 0 0 872,000
Contingency 0 0 138,000 ❑ 0 0 0 0 138,000
Total External 105,855 147,000 1,048,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,300,855
Total Project Expense 148,016 187,000 1,088,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,423,016
REVENUES
Revenue Funding Source
421-Parks Bond Fund 42,244 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42,244
425-Parks SDC Fund 105,772 0 95,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,772
Total Revenue Funding 148,016 0 95,000 0 0 0 0 0 243,016
Other Revenue Source
Connect Oregon VI 0 42,000 658,000 0 0 0 0 0 700,000
Urban Renewal Capital 0 45,000 195,000 0 0 0 0 0 240,000
Improvement
Washington County 0 100,000 140,000 0 0 0 0 0 240,000
MSTIP
Total Other Revenue 0 187,000 993,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,180,000
Total Revenues 148,016 187,000 1,088,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,423,016
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 267
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PARKS
92046-Farm Creek Trail Connection(RFFA Grant)
Project Need:Construct segments of the Fanno Creek Regional Trail.
Project Description:This project constructs four segments of the Fanno Creek Trail.Segment 1-Grant Avenue to Woodard Park;
Segment 2-Ash Avenue to Hall Boulevard;Segment 3-City Library to Bonita Road;Segment 4-85th Avenue(south of Durham Road)
to the Tualatin River.There is a separate CIP(#92013-The Fanno Creek Remeander)which will realign the trail from Main Street to
Ash Avenue.
Project Results:All segments of the Fanno Creek Trail within Tigard will be complete except for the segment from Bonita Road to the
City of Durham.This project supports the vision statement in the City of Tigard's Strategic Plan:"The most walkable community in the
Pacific Northwest..."
Project Funding:The Regional Flexible Funds(RFFA)grant fedetal dollars willrequire coordination with Metro and Oregon
Department of Transportation.Minimum city matching contribution is about$500,000;total project cost includes$4,350,000 RFFA
grant. Additional city funding may be used for contingency. Amenities along the trail that are not covered by the grant are in a
companion project 1119CIP-07.
Total Project Cost:$6,000,000
City of Tigard Project Cost: $1,535,000
Actual
through Projected Project
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
EXPENSES
Internal Expenses
Project Management 80,352 60,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 40,000 0 0 380,352
Total Internal 80,352 60,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 40,000 0 0 380,352
External Expenses
Land/Right of Way 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Acquisition
Design and Engineering 11,690 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 171,690
Construction 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 100,000 0 0 400,000
Environmental Permit 0 0 25,000 0 0 7,800 0 0 32,800
Compliance
Contingency 0 0 40,000 110,000 150,000 150,000 0 0 450,000
Total External 11,690 160,000 165,000 260,000 300,000 257,800 0 0 1,154,490
Total Project Expense 92,042 220,000 215,000 335,000 375,000 297,800 0 0 1,534,842
REVENUES
Revenue Funding Source
415-Transportation SDC 0 0 100,000 185,000 150,000 65,000 0 0 500,000
Fund
425-Parks SDC Fund 76,017 220,000 115,000 150,000 225,000 232,800 0 0 1,018,817
510-Stormwater Fund 16,025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,025
Total Revenue Funding 92,042 220,000 215,000 335,000 375,000 297,800 0 0 1,534,842
Total Revenues 92,042 220,000 215,000 335,000 375,000 297,800 0 0 1,534,842
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 269
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PARKS
92057-Fanno Creek Trail Amenities
Project Need: The federally funded Fanno Creek Trail project(#92046)is being managed through ODOT and has a strict project
scope that can include only hail transportation related elements. Supporting aesthetic,interpretive and site furnishing elements are
desired amenities to the project.
Project Description: This is a companion project to#92046,which uses Federal funds to construct new and rebuilt sections of the
Fanno Creek Trail. This locally funded project will add amenities along the new trail sections such as interpretive signage,overlooks,
benches and artwork to enhance the experience of trail users.
Project Results: Enhanced user experience along the Fanno Creek Trail.
Total Project Cost:$730,000
Actual
through Projected Project
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
EXPENSES
Internal Expenses
Project Management 0 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 0 80,000
Total Internal 0 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 0 80,000
External Expenses
Design and Engineering 0 0 20,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 0 0 130,000
Construction 0 0 0 0 150,000 250,000 0 0 400,000
Contingency 0 0 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 0 0 120,000
Total Exteuml 0 0 20,000 60,000 230,000 340,000 0 0 650,000
Total Project Expense 0 0 40,000 80,000 250,000 360,000 0 0 730,000
REVENUES
Revenue Funding Source
425-Parks SDC Fund 0 0 40,000 80,000 250,000 360,000 0 0 730,000
Total Revenue Funding 0 0 40,000 80,000 250,000 360,000 0 0 730,000
Total Revenues 0 0 40,000 80,000 250,000 360,000 0 0 730,000
PAGE 274- CITY OF TIGARD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - STORMWATER
17CIP-08-Tigard Triangle Stormwater Implementation Plan/Predesign
Project Need:As identified in the Tigard Storrnwater Master Plan,a regional plan for stounwater management in the Tigard Triangle is
needed to support redevelopment plans for the area and to address stream erosion problems.The new lean development code for the
Tigard Triangle is anticipated to work best using a regional stormwater management approach in which most of the volume of runoff
generated by new and re-development would be handled in a series of floodplain restoration areas along Red Rock Creek.
Project Description:Using stormwater data and general storm facility location/sizing information generated in the citywide Stormwater
Master Plan project,an implementation plan for regional stormwater management in the Tigard Triangle will be completed.Site-specific
preliminary design for regional facilities,floodplain restoration,trail alignment,right of way/easement acquisition needs and storm
conveyance infrastructure will be included in the plan.
Project Results:Implementation plan for regional stormwater management in the Tigard Triangle.
Project Funding:Funding for this project and/or design and construction of any regional facilities may be partially or fully provided by
Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area funds.
Total Project Cost: $165,000
Actual
through Projected Project
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
EXPENSES
Internal Expenses
Project Management 0 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000
Total Internal 0 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000
External Expenses
Design and Engineering 0 0 0 130,000 0 0 0 0 130,000
Contingency 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 15,000
Total External 0 0 0 145,000 0 0 0 0 145,000
Total Project Expense 0 0 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 165,000
REVENUES
Revenue Funding Source
510-Stonnwater Fund 0 0 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 165,000
Total Revenue Funding 0 0 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 165,000
Total Revenues 0 0 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 16D,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 299
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - STORMWATER
18CIP-04-Commercial Street Stormwater Facility
Project Need:Stormwater treatment for a large existing untreated area to meet regional stormwater regulatory permit requirements and
Healthy Streams Plan goals.
Project Description:This project will construct a stormwater facility to treat stormwater runoff from up to 47 acres that discharge into
Fanno Creek.It meets outfall-retrofitting goals identified in the regional Healthy Streams Plan.This project will be coordinated with the
Main Street Green Street Phase 2 Project to pro-dde for some of the needed stormwater treatment.
Project Results:Stormwater treatment for a large untreated area including portions of Thain Street.
Total Project Cost:$376,000
Actual
through Projected Project
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
EXPENSES
Internal Expenses
Project Alanagement 0 0 0 15,000 30,000 10,000 0 0 55,000
Total Internal 0 0 0 15,000 30,000 10,000 0 0 55,000
External Expenses
Design and Engineering 0 0 0 31,000 0 0 0 0 31,000
Construction 0 0 0 0 190,000 60,000 0 0 250,000
Contingency 0 0 0 0 20,000 20,000 0 0 40,000
Total External 0 0 0 31,000 210,000 80,000 0 0 321,000
Total Project Expense 0 0 0 46,000 240,000 90,000 0 0 376,000
REVENUES
Revenue Funding Source
511-Water 0 0 0 46,000 240,000 90,000 0 0 376,000
Quality/Quantity Fund
Total Revenue Funding 0 0 0 46,000 240,000 90,000 0 0 376,000
Total Revenues 0 0 0 46,000 240,000 90,000 0 0 376,000
PAGE 300 - CITY OF TIGARD
chapter 2: existing conditions
TABLE 1: RIGHT-OF-WAY CONDITION
Right- Regional
Street Name of-Way Lanes Lean Code Classification Transportation Material and
Width System Condition
Classification
Atlanta St 30' No lane markings None Minor Asphalt
(west of 72nd) Residential
Atlanta St 30'-78' 2 traffic lanes in either direction Pedestrian Street/Access Neighborhood Asphalt
(east of 70th) Street Collector
Pedestrian Street(72nd-
Baylor St 45'-60' No lane markings,speed bumps 69th)/ Minor Asphalt
Access Street Residential
(69th-66th)
Pedestrian Street(72nd-
Clinton St 50'-60' No lane markings 69th)/ Minor Asphalt
Access Street Residential
(69th-67th)
Dartmouth St 94'-98' 2 lanes in either direction with a center Access Street Neighborhood Concrete
turn lane, bike lanes Collector
Pedestrian Street(72nd-
Elmhurst St 30-60' No lane markings 69th)/ Minor Asphalt
Access Street Residential
(69th-68th)
Hermoso St 1 53' No lane markings Access Street Minor Asphalt
Residential
No lane markings;concrete curb one Minor
Franklin St 60' side;on-street parking both sides; Access Street Residential Asphalt
pavement good condition
No lane markings in some segments, 1
Beveland St 56'-70' lane in each side with turn lanes in other Pedestrian Street Minor Asphalt
segments.On-street parking in some Residential
segments.
Gonzaga St 60' No lane markings,on-street parking on Access Street Minor Asphalt
one side Residential
Pedestrian Street(72nd-
Hampton St 60' 2 lanes in either direction with center 69th)/ Neighborhood
turn lane Access Street Collector
(69th-66th)
Irving St Private road Access Street — Asphalt
12 1 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
chapter 2: existing conditions
TABLE 1: RIGHT-OF-WAY CONDITION (CONTINUED)
Right- Regional
Street Name of-Way Lanes Lean Code Classification Transportation Material and
Width System Condition
Classification
Numbered Streets MIL
99W/Pacific 90'-115' 6 traffic lanes,bike lanes,two-way traffic — Major Arterial Asphalt
Highway
Pedestrian Street(Pacific
74th Ave 60' No lane markings,two-way traffic Hwy-Dartmouth)/Access Private legally Asphalt
Street(Dartmouth named road
-Beveland)
2 traffic lanes on either directions in Asphalt mostly.
some segments,bikes lanes, 1 lane in Some intersections
72nd Ave 56'-94' Pedestrian Street Minor Arterial
each direction in narrower segments are concrete(72nd
(between Hermoso and Beveland) and Dartmouth)
Asphalt in some
No lane markings.2 way traffic.Some segments.
segments have on-street parking on Minor Unimproved(gravel
70th Ave 28'-60' one or both sides(a segment between Access Street Residential without curbs)in
Dartmouth and Elmhurst and Clinton) some segments
(between Clinton
and Dartmouth).
1 traffic lane each direction(in the south
69th Ave 60' of the Triangle near Franklin). No lane Pedestrian Street Minor Asphalt
markings and deteriorated roads in Residential
some segments(north of Dartmouth).
1 traffic lane each direction.Transit
route(bus stops).On-street parking on Neighborhood
68th Ave 60' one side in some segments(Franklin to Access Street Collector Asphalt
Elmhurst). Bike lanes(from Dartmouth
to Atlanta)
1 traffic lane each direction with center Neighborhood
68th Pkwy 80' landscaped median(trees and street Access Street Collector
lights)
67th 60' 1 traffic lane each direction;on-street Access Street Minor Asphalt
parking from Baylor to Clinton. Residential
66th 24'-42' 1 traffic lane each direction;on-street Access Street Minor Asphalt
parking from Baylor to Clinton Residential
Minor Asphalt.
64th 28'-40' No lane markings,2 way traffic Regional and Local Trail Residential Deteriorated with
Street cracks and potholes
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 13
chapter 2: existing conditions
117;
i
1
Left:Atlanta east of 68th Right:Atlanta west of 72nd
Left: Baylor looking west towards 72nd Right: Baylor looking east at 70th
laps.
It]�l
L _
-loom -
Left: Beveland looking west of 72nd Right:Beveland looking east at 69th
14 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN SEPTEMBER 2016
chapter 2: existing conditions
ar
4
Left: Clinton looking west from 72nd Right: Coronado Street looking east along 99W/Pacific Highway
EL
r _
Left:Dartmouth near 70th Right: Dartmouth near 72nd
T�
Left: Elmhurst looking towards 70th Right:Elmhurst at 72nd
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN SEPTEMBER 2016 1 15
.. Li �� { �1''� •j lfil�i k
_ � J
u `s
_.�� `•,tom.'. ,�.
�r
chapter 2: existing conditions
Left:Franklin looking west from 68th Right:Gonzaga looking east from 72nd
� o _
Left:Hampton near1 •ht: Hermosa
�' t�,� :eft - •��_ _ Emu
ME ri Ah
Left
• • • at 68th
16 TIGARD TRIANGLE STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN SEPTEMBER 2016
chapter 2: existing conditions
TOPOGRAPHY
41
P 4
350 364 wo
o�
380
i m '370AM-
a
�N
_ m
N
0
X80 V
• � r
I
�o 120
R
i
240
N a°
N v 23p 70
�
L'
N 270 g9
w
� c
9a -
a a ry
Q r
160 170
10'Contours Feet
Streams 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Taxlots
Tigard Triangle RDW
18 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN SEPTEMBER 2016
chapter 2: existing conditions
Topography
Topography is a notable feature \
of the Tigard Triangle landscape. ' '
While much of the Triangle is y,
'r
generally flat, the northeast-
ern portion of the project area
includes some steeper sections.
The topography generally slopes
down and away from 99W/Pacific
Highway and Atlanta to the Red
Rock Creek corridor. South of
Atlanta, the land slopes upward
to the west, with the greatest
grade change occurring near Steeper grades along 72nd Avenue north of the Red Rock Creek
Dartmouth Street.
General topographic slope
conditions observed from GIS .
data:
• North of Red Rock Creek —
(10-13%)
• West of 72nd Ave (3-5%) 4-
• East of 72nd (3-7%) -
Topographic conditions have
a direct relationship with the
way buildings, roads, driveways,
street frontages, parking, Steeper grades along Dartmouth north of the Red Rock Creek
gathering places, stormwater
run-off, sidewalks and building
entries can be managed and
designed. For the Triangle's long
term success and appeal to the
broadest range of people as a
center for business, commercial
and residential uses, providing
accessible routes to and between
destinations should be a priority,
and street design must account
for the needs of people of all
ages and abilities. -
Steeper grades north of the Red Rock Creek along 68th
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 1 19
chapter 2: existing conditions
MISSING SIDEWALKS
aAamuR
gUR e,v[ FVVY
ti
670
a
-
�-
.'LyY n i
A
r x
A
1 1 N
`r `n
01,
n Un
IE
ok
s
f
A
N
Triangle sidewalk gaps
Taxlots
20 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN SEPTEMBER 2016
chapter 2: existing conditions
Missing Sidewalks _
The availability of sidewalks in the
Triangle is generally dependent
on location. While newer streets
have sidewalks, there are many
locations where none exist,
either on one or both sides of
the streets. Streets with primarily y
residential uses more commonly
have missing sidewalks. The
following streets with missing
sidewalks are noted:
• Beveland
Missing sidewalks along Baylor near 70th
• Baylor
t'
• Clinton
• Elmhurst
• Hermoso -
• 66th
• 69th
• 72nd north of Dartmouth has
many segments with sidewalks
missing on both sides
Improving walkability in the
Tigard Triangle will require a Missing sidewalks on both sides along Beveland near 70th
complete network of sidewalks or
other safe connections that reach
J
major destinations. The Tigard `
Triangle proposed street sections,
described in Chapter 4, provide
ideas of how to physically add ,
protected walks to streets where:
they are absent in the short-term �.
with low-cost solutions that can
} L S
provide immediate results. �
Additional sidewalk information .r
can be found in Table 2: Inventory
of Existing Sidewalks and Street
Furnishings. _ NEW11IN&MV--ni.� ...
Missing sidewalks along Clinton near 70th
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 1 21
chapter 2: existing conditions
I
l -
a=
f
r
Left: Curbs and missing sidewalks along Elmhurst at 72nd Right: Curbs and missing sidewalks along Hermoso
r
Left:Missing sidewalks on both sides along 66th Right: Missing sidewalks on both sides along 69th
r<R
Left:Missing sidewalk along 72nd at Hermoso Right:Missing sidewalk along 72nd north of Dartmouth
22 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN SEPTEMBER 2016
chapter 2: existing conditions
SURFACE PARKING LOCATIONS
•• ♦ ,�. •
if led +„ ■'/■ �•■�11 ■ :. n n .x,1.6•
rr ±..ter '■ 1 rrar rar-1j• ,� ' ■ •2 j■'� ■
1 ■ ■ s*!"*. ...:■.■ i a X91 I:r:■.. i.. � � • '• a � a+ I l
A L 0.1%AN ■ ■�w■■b'41 f J•
r r 1 . 1 • s• ■ter ♦ •'.
r 1 ■ J.
■.■ .' 1 ".. + f IIS
16
WIN ^ 1 1 + ■Z
�•■■ � 402UM' L•
Ta N •=�tt Y V +` 1 ♦rpt. .
BAWLbR d�V a.'�' ■ r�1. ~ 1 t, �'rt■ - jr ■ L
IF-■•-: l 1 •■ r• i
♦ti . / L
r 1 1 + I r *t• 7, r
00 ih.r.•-. CLINTON ■ ■ YA ♦4 f 1•r! r•r
ir
■■.. f+ ■� 1 ■ y ♦ 1• A ■rte■ M. 7
OgRt 04th '• � i� . .. i i 1�•�� ♦i i •
L'
_ 10, t■
1 � �»r"tir•ar�-r■
« ^� F=� >>+'►��►a !-! ea 1rraft *.r•■mow
ELMHURST * r 1 1 V L r L 1 t a ■aa r■■ rr. i It•
il='J L 1 }•.L 1"1 7•R r a Y ■ f B s'•
• J.1 � B ■ ■ ■ • •
'4 • . �._.. ' Z ■SLI ■ L 7 i 1 L y..■1 ■ I /r*
t ♦• HERMOsrO� I■ , 1 E.1 ti■ J'1 ■ r i s .ae i a a a �+r
t •■�••�� -�IIII■ JL W i I L 1.2 LL! `r 1 •of ■i it wow
`/ . 1 of...ft ����■ F.RA I(LIN r •Lr t l aA �•r 1
►r.a a.a
«; �� BEVELAND 7 ■� 4■wl 1 i.-1 J■ L 1�~�tf 'Y!
`BV�LA�ND �_ 'L' yf En■•w■ Wr Al ±•.■ ! tf
1 1 _ -; UTN 000 ..r i ffal tl
♦' . O GO ZAT'C'A'a ' ti Ir 1; r■-,�1.1 !�t rrrrr�a
r .J ■J IV.1 ■ ,■.+ ■ ♦ Saar
AF r
H MPTON ' 1 a
to
Alp
`�■� 4
rr-..
mom
■ �'1 ♦�..J h ■ r�M�ja,+iE!11 to r
Nip 40
AP a
11
40
■ *4 t •
t Z 1p ■� lb
ILS■•r
lbw r.■a■� 1 ■i1 ,trf■�
■
�♦ w t
Feet
0 625 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000
Streets
- Building Footprints
- Surface Parking Lots
Street ROW within the Triangle
26 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN SEPTEMBER 2016
chapter 2: existing conditions
WETLANDS, CREEKS AND SITES WITHOUT CENTRALIZED SEWER
A� M w
m PINE ST a °P 5w 8 PAl
;I : W a
r CH 7
Y F _
•LUm Villa `t
w W 7 ¢ Rid � VE
O w w > a u7
n ¢ d F Portland 5
m a 01
a Community
x ❑ °�
a w W n > College--Sylvania p>a 7 J w m Q N
❑ w a Q y x
x •x !y� o -
ry a
^!ij m Vi ait ' 9W PG
Tigard a w s'(y fi c
LU
< 7 �� n.
Plaza 0 ,` ¢ a
� m� ❑ SSS r-
G Q- ❑ z
Al� M U L T N o
DS a� M1 w �� C L A C K A
tot n W w
�1+P K N❑ ¢ a � a
�l r v a• a:
AY T ta fo 4T'Y C RAE K
W b +�♦ 0 GALEN ST
w
S � LUa
W ¢ a a s 0 F.
Tre c e Nelk
' ¢ x ❑ a = *' y W o D R C?P
k0 Lu
RD o � � �° x t
Uj
2 SUNCRIE DR �c a.
.... FLA
.
• fi'y ON DR
S, s
KR kgwo0�
�s m c�R 1c�
y
1 Fs.w� �
Z
S N24'
TP A -0
N
fir' = , '■.c C� C r u As 1-/
BMW" ■ �' n
N ural NS A N D� 'Qq i Oaks open A se 4P L N �I Ew 1),+oma R G S 7 R9d *�+� Spac R u P�
- VH CENTER DR
CWS Streams(open) Source: Tigardmaps.com
CWS Streams(piped)
Wetland
Sanitary sewer reimbursement districts(completed)
The City's Sanitary Sewer roads. The ditches drain to catch
Extension Program seeks to basins that are connected to the
establish reimbursement districts centralized stormwater system.
that provide opportunity for Roads with these conditions
owners to connect to public lines. typically do not have sidewalks or
Other conditions include the lack other pedestrian facilities.
of piped stormwater facilities
along residential streets where
surface drainage flows into grassy
ditches at the edges of paved
30 1 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
chapter 3: urban design framework
C H A P T E R 3
urban design framework
Strategic Plan Principles clear identity; and ; =r
The Tigard Triangle Strategic Is marketable to developers
Plan identifies a series of
and the public, and is
planning principles that guide implementable. Identified
future improvements in the improvements are feasible
Triangle. These principles set the from both a financial and a
foundation for the Design Plan as construction perspective, with
follows: no "red flag" obstacles.
• Provide a safe and effective Design Principles
multimodal (auto, bicycle,
Building on these planning
pedestrian, and transit)
network circulation and access principles, there are several t
to, from, and in the Triangle
specific design principles that
that not only considers emerged during the planning
process that provide a framework
existing development, but also for designing, building and r
interfaces with future transit
retrofitting streets. This urban
and future transit- and pedes- design framework considers the
trian-oriented development; following:
• Integrate land use and • Easy to navigate and identify
transportation planning to by foot, car, bus and bike
ensure a vibrant town center . Friendly to pedestrians and
by identifying the right mix of bicyclists Parking management
uses and densities; • Fun places along the way
• Build upon existing charac- • Accessibility
teristics that make the Triangle
unique and desirable in order Safety
to develop a community with a • Sustainable design/context
sensitive
• Vehicular access management
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 I 31
chapter 3: urban design framework
Easy to navigate and identify '
by foot, car, bike and bus > 2 ,
The street network within Tigard
Triangle should be easy to * 1'
navigable by users of all trans- ;•
portation modes. Streetscape
features such as signage and
wayfinding elements should be
designed at two scales: vehicular
and pedestrian scales.
Vehicular-scale wayfinding r �
includes directional signage
for motorists to get to the
highway and interstate system
(1-5, 99W and Pacific Highway).
Along local streets within the piuk
Triangle, wayfinding should Stadium
be at a pedestrian scale using
streetscape elements such i
as gateways, public art, use
of notable landmarks and
directional signage at intersec-
tions and route changes. Signage
should also inform cyclists who -
desire direct routes to various
destinations both within and
beyond the Triangle.
VOliaulnr Wroellonal alpik SreenAa rY Val,lavlur M t.'•s rr i.n
Dlroctlnn-1 S117n On—„L11• 1;i�ui
m�gl5
Ilakevie
,nom Amn I.�
$_$mi DIURCT 23 min C
HAA fTHONIE
DISTRICT 3min r
HAY;�H4f��
1 mi RUGS 5 min , r4
S
32 1 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
chapter 3: urban design framework
Friendly to pedestrians and ,Li I,
bicyclists
Streets in pedestrian-oriented W
areas of the Triangle should -
spaces where people feel safe,
welcome and feature amenities
that capture their interest. r
Pedestrian and bicycle-friendly
streets are characterized by a
number of elements, including: 0 !.
• Shorter block lengths;
• Well-marked crosswalks;
• Curb extensions;
• Frequent intersections; F O :
• Fewer or consolidated access
too
and egress points into the amu ''.: LEa-0pLE4ABd
street;
• Landscaping; and
• Appropriately-scaled signage
and lighting.
Streets that are more auto-ori- ti I
ented will also benefit from many
of these elements, encouraging
slower speeds and attention to
other road users. T '
Iw
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 I 33
chapter 3: urban design framework
Fun places along the way
Streets in the Triangle should be
designed to create memorable
experiences and spark interaction � �
between people. Design = '
elements should include public
art, places to sit and observe, y
landscaped stormwater facilities,
and smaller gathering spaces or
parklets.
Adding these amenities will
encourage visitors, residents and
workers to respond and interact
by stopping to read an interpre-
tive signage or listening to music
or engaging with public art or
sculpture.
,J
�� or
i
mew
. x
34 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
chapter 3: urban design framework
Accessibility
As streets become more ` -
walkable, bike-able and transit
oriented, it is critical they are
also functional and inclusive for
people of all ages and abilities—
wheelchair users, persons with _
vision impairments, parents with
strollers, children, older adults
and all other populations.
Sidewalks, curb ramps, parking,
street crossings, landscaping
elements, resting places and
public art in the Triangle must
be designed to meet minimum
Americans with Disabilities Act --
(ADA) standards, while striving to
reduce barriers to create environ-
ments for everyone.
7
y
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 35
chapter 3: urban design framework
Safety a
Streets in the Triangle should be
designed to enable safe access
for all users, regardless of age,
ability, or mode of transportation. _
Drivers, transit users, pedestrians
and bicyclists should be able to
interact and use the same streets, 1
while minimizing conflict. 1ti
Several existing streets in the
Triangle lack sidewalks, curbs
and safe crossing opportunities.
Amenities that increase safety
should include a range of design
treatments, including: ,�..
• Buffered sidewalks;
• Crosswalks with contrasting i
materials or colors;
• Median islands or refuges;
• Buffered bike lanes;
• Directional and identification
9
signage;
• Convenient and accessible '
transit stops;
• Pedestrian-scale lighting; and
• Curb extensions or bulb-outs.
ri� O
�� �
-
n
36 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
chapter 3: urban design framework
Sustainable design/context
t
sensitive
Streets should be designed ¢o. . f .
for long-term operations, r -
maintenance and usability. These r'
considerations such help lower �. :...
operation and maintenance costs,
minimize environmental impacts,
provide wildlife and plant habitat T _ •`
and create places that contribute _
to neighborhood sustainability. _ .
The Tigard Streetscape Design =_
Plan establishes a set of street
types for the Triangle. These
street types will serve as a
guide for designing appropriate
streetscape environments. Streets py.o
will be designed to respond to
the surrounding land use context ,
and transportation characteristics. r
All streets in the Triangle will be
designed holistically, where built
features integrate with natural
systems. From pervious pavement
and flow-through planters that
manage storm-water run-off, to 4 _
street trees that provide shade,
every streetscape element should �-
embody sustainable design and
reflect the characteristics of the
local environment.
L_ t CLEA
WATER
4
I
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 37
chapter 3: urban design framework
Vehicular access management
Street design should minimize . M
conflicts between pedestrians
and automobiles, through
g
management of curb cuts and
access points along the street.
Vehicular access to each
commercial or business site
should be consolidated to the
extent practicable, prioritiz-
ing safe and direct access for
pedestrians, cyclists and transit
users. f
A
Each development should "
consider the layout of on-site _
parking and loading areas,
vehicular, bike, and pedestrian
circulation patterns with the
adjacent street in mind. '{ '_
Effective access management
■
guidelines will address
unregulated curb cuts from - 4`
commercial development along ,--
major streets in the Triangle by '
providing guidelines for traffic • -�{ as
signal spacing, location of
driveways, median openings, and -
multi-modal options. J
f�
38 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
chapter 3: urban design framework
Parking management _---
Parking in the Triangle should be
planned around a management ' - -
system that maximizes use of
existing parking while balancing
demand. Improving the utilization _
and efficiency of the existing �+
parking supply will involve severalVr
strategies:
• Creating a clear and consistent
system to find and navigable
available parking; -
• Designing shared parking
facilities serving multiple uses;
• Reducing the minimum r '�----
off-street parking requirements
to support the development of
pedestrian-oriented districts;
• Providing real-time data
on parking availability and
dynamic pricing for spaces
• Incentivizing transit and
bicycle usage by completing
first and final-mile
connections'; and
• Converting surface parking
to structured parking in the
long-term.
parking spot recommender
Engineering2015
1 The -first and final-mile"connection
describes the beginning or end of an
individual trip made primarily by public
transportation. The gap from public
transit to destination is termed as first or
final-mile connection. 4
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 I 39
40 1 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
chapter 4: plan recommendations
C H A P T E R 4
plan recommendations
Street Types
There are four street types that
should guide the future design _
of public streets in the Triangle. i
These include: {
• Pedestrian streets;
Yp
'
• Access streets;
• Transitional streets; and
• Stormwater streets/sites ,
These classifications stem from
the existing Lean Code, as well
as design solutions that respond
to the conditions facing the
Triangle.
rt
4
'.
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 I 41
chapter 4: plan recommendations
Pedestrian streets
A pedestrian street is a thorough-
fares held to the highest
standards in terms of building s
frontages and streetscapes ,,¢ ,. r
by virtue of their pre-existing,
pedestrian-supportive qualities,
proximity to potential future
station areas, and/or future
importance to pedestrian
connectivity (Tigard Lean Code, _ -
2015). For the purposes of T
the Streetscape Design Plan,
pedestrian streets are also
intended to formalize many
rights-of-way in the Triangle ,
that lack basic elements such as
sidewalks, stormwater tie-ins, safe
crosswalks, street trees, and basic
lane striping.
At full build out, pedestrian
streets can include on-street _
parking, bike sharrows (where
needed to create interconnected
bike routes), shorter distance
crosswalks, mid-block crossings, ---
seating areas, pedestrian street
lighting, bulbouts and street
trees and other landscaping. All 11111L
features are should be designed j
for universal accessibility and l
improved pedestrian visibility. '►# 1
Where appropriate, in-street
stormwater facilities can be
added to pedestrian streets as an ------
overlay (see Stormwater Streets).
k.
li uRuew
VIRR%S
42 1 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
/I
D
;o
NOR
Z ~���■ -
- - -
m —
�:,—_ till;
m
m
cn -
0 — —
D
U
Landscaping/ On-street Shared Travel Shared Travel On-street Landscaping/
CO) Sidewalk Furnishing parking Lane Lane parking Furnishing Sidewalk
0 61-71 6' a' 10' 10' S` 6' 6'-7
z n
Right-of-Way =r
60 - 62' °
a CD
z
A
0
0 m
1 3
0
W
n
m
0
3
N
PEDESTRIAN STREET TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
Q
°' LOCATION: 69TH AVE AND HAMPTON d
A
°
TIGARD TRIANGLE STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN
W fp
A Benches and furnishings s
Furnishing zone Raised mid-block m
Shared parking (seating,trees, designed to support social a
crossing interaction and add Landscaping
between adjacent pedestrian-scaled (every 250') (street trees and planters)
businesses lighting) visual interest
) A
D
3
` _ t
D 'tiff I 3
N
M
jl m
I r.
M L
M
n
D � , r
M :`:;,
'r
N
Z
Z '•.V1
o
OU
> -
en
Ls —
PEDESTRIAN STREET AERIAL VIEW
LOCATION:69TH AVE AND HAMPTON
TIGARD TRIANGLE STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN
i
D IIIII �
Z
17,
M
� f
1
M
0 j f
M I —
v -
m
cn -
Z
r
D m
2 A
O
Buildings fronting Benches specifically Speed tables to reduce traffic
9 9 Curb extensions and On-street Pedestrian-scaled lighting
O streetscape designed for pedestrian speed. Designed as raised distinctive paving parking
00 setback as per streets to provide a mid-block crossings with a height c,
M p functional service as well of 3-3.5 inches and a length of 22 patterns facilitate safe c
;Ul lean code) pedestrian crossing �
N as to provide visual detail feet (http://nacto.org/) 3
and interest `D
CL
PEDESTRIAN STREET MID-BLOCK CROSSING
0
TIGARD TRIANGLE STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN y
chapter 4: plan recommendations
Access streets _
An access street is a thoroughfare
that by virtue of its use, location, _
or absence of pre-existing
pedestrian-supportive qualities,
has reduced requirements
r
for building frontages and
streetscapes.
Access streets in the Triangle
are important from a vehicular - - —
standpoint in that they directly r
link to adjacent major highways .
0
(99W) and freeways (1-5). They
also provide access to the
Triangle's popular destinations,
such as shopping centers,
business parks and educational
facilities.
Access streets should also
function better for pedestrians
with an emphasis on pedestrian
crossings, street and sidewalk
lighting, strategically placed
branding and identity elements,
and street furnishings at key
intersections. At the same time,
access streets must also provide
improved function for motorists
and bicyclists with directional
signage, enhanced visibility/
sightlines at intersections and
curb cuts into parking areas.
46 1 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
I
I
I^ I
l ti_ Ii ❑ ❑ � IES � � I
I
D
D II
Z iJI
m
I
C/) '
m
mCn
- +. •�
0 I Landscaping an scaping i
Sidewalk Furnishing Bike Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Bike Lane Furnishing Sidewalk
a ' 7' -8` 7' 6' 10' 10' 6' 7' 7'.19'
m Right-of-Way ,
0 60'-62'
m
Cn
z n
3
r
D CD
z A
0
0 m
1 3
0
W
n
m C
N ACCESS STREET TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
LOCATION:68TH AVE AND ELMHURSTCn
3
a
TIGARD TRIANGLE STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN
0
A =
V fp
co Shared parking located at the Furnsihing zone (bike Mid-block Streetlight with branding and Landscaping
side and/or rear of buildings corral, signage etc.) crossing wayfinding banner (street trees) Directional signage
m
W3EULU
3 1,
D e e O
Z
CD
� m a a s o 3
r m Ea m
m r a
y ` O
� 1 3
m ter"
m
� 11
D
m
v
m --
Z
O
O
m
o _
rn
ACCESS STREET AERIAL VIEW
LOCATION:68TH AVE AND ELMHURST
TIGARD TRIANGLE STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN
D
v
D __----- ri
Z .r Z
i
m _ ---
m
m
cn
n
D
m _
m
M
Z n
3
r ..
D fD
Z A
O
n m
1 3
WIntersection with Curb cuts at driveways with Landscaping buffer to Furnishing zone to accomodate bike Buildings fronting
m contrasting paving contrasting paving pattern to screen off-street parking racks,wayfinding and landscaping streetscape(setback as o
facilitate safe pedestrian per lean code)
c crossing ACCESS STREET INTERSECTION TREATMENT 3
rn LOCATION:68TH AVE AND ELMHURST a
d
TIGARD TRIANGLE STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN o
A =
l0 fp
chapter 4: plan recommendations
Transitional streets -- __ rp ;
Transitional streetscape designs
allow for lower-cost, interim :,. .
improvements in improving
the right of way to address —= "
pedestrian network deficiencies ;;''�
and complete connections for
people traveling by active modes _
(walking, bicycling and accessing -
transit).
Interim transitional streetscape
improvements enhance
walkability by providing
continuous pedestrian access
while the Triangle redevelops.
These designs will also facilitate
behavior change among
roadway users consistent with
the streetscape characteris-
tics planned for full build out.
Implementing transitional -
streetscape designs will be key
to enhancing walkability and
slowing vehicular speeds in antic-
.
ipation of future development.
- � ..
There are several precedent
examples that can be deployed
at strategic locations in the
short-term using low-cost
materials such as asphalt paving,
manufactured concrete curb
stops, striping and road paint and
a range of landscape materials.
:rr.*
Illustrations (opposite page)
provide a general understand-
ing of potential elements, space
requirements, and other consid-
erations for transitional streets in
the Tigard Triangle.
50 I TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
chapter 4: plan recommendations
T
r _
_-ter l_•
r
{
r'
f w
li Above:Residential street with no sidewalks
Below: Transitional street with curb stop protected pedestrian zone, driveway striping and planting buffer
1
� I
r
V _
C
• .N
Multi
use Travel Lane path Unpaved
15' 15'-20' 6' 15'
Right-of-Way
50'-55'
T I G A R D TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 51
^' On-street Concrete curb stops Markings on the
Landscaping buffers parking buffer demarcate multi-use path mullti-use path to
multi-use path at multi-use path at from travel lanes and indicate access to
Travel lanes some locations some locations private driveways private driveways
,n A
D �
3
D r
z
m
r �
MFN
3
M �{
(n
`- s - _ - t
M ohm w
M
AIV
r.
r
z
1
z a
4
O
n
0 n 1
W
M
� . I
01 !
Travel lane becomes A multi-use lane for pedestrians and
narrow at points and cyclists is created in the short-term using
requires cars to wait their Concrete curb stops concrete curb stops/landcaping/
path from travel l
luse
turn to pass each other demarcate multion-street parking
anes
and private driveways TRANSITIONAL STREET-STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS
LOCATION:CLINTON STREET NEAR 72ND AVE
TIGARD TRIANGLE STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN
chapter 4: plan recommendations
Stormwater streets/sites
Designated stormwater streets
and stormwater sites in the �Mlll:�pr, I
Tigard Triangle can help
the city meet its stormwater vim
management goal from the 2027
Comprehensive Plan (Goal 11,
Section 1). These facilities will _
consist of a range of low-impact
development approaches (LIDA)
such as flow-through planters,
infiltration rain gardens and
planters, porous pavement,
vegetated swales and filter strips
and stormwater conveyance art
pieces.
Stormwater streets/sites should
be designed to provide the
following benefits:
• Handle stormwater onsite;
• Enhance the streetscape
environment with attractive, -
functional and sustainable
infrastructure that create
memorable and unique places
for pedestrians;
• Provide water quality benefits
and replenishment of also at crossings with adjacent
groundwater; sidewalk facilities to encourage
• Provide new locations for pedestrian interaction. These
pedestrian access, public art facilities shall consider universal
and gathering spots; and design, accessibility, visibility and
safety. Landscape plantings shall
• Reduce impact on existing be selected in coordination with
stormwater management the stormwater facility function,
facilities. urban forestry, adjacent land use
All streets will require stormwater and roadway classifications.
management, and, where
feasible, LIDA facilities shall be
incorporated. Facilities can be
installed along the roadway and
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 I 53
A
D
�1
v l 1. O1
7
a
D _ a
z
— - - -
CD
M a
m
cn _ o
� 3
0
D
M
v
M
c) Stormwater Stormwater
z Sidewalk Bike Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane
v �
Treatment Bike Lane Treatment Sidewalk
r, 7- -8' 7- 61 10- 10' 6' 7' 7--V
>
--8-
D 60 - 62'
z
0 Right-of-Way
0
0
W
M
N
0
rn
ACCESS STREET WITH STORMWATER TREATMENT
LOCATION:68TH AVE AND ELMHURST
TIGARD TRIANGLE STREETSCAPE PLAN
Gl i
rl _
of
ZWN
M ���M1■:. _:.
cn
UA
r
N
M y
M
cn --
n
D --
m -
o Shared Travel Shared Travel
M Sidewalk StormwaterTreatment Lane Lane Stormwater Treatment Sidewalk
_o) 6'-7' 12.5'-14' 10' TQ' 12.5'-14' 6--7-
C)
'-7'C)
Z Right-of-Way n
60'-62' s
r
v
D m
Z
A
O
n m
1 3
O
W
n
M
0
3
N
O �
PEDESTRIAN STREET WITH STORMWATER TREATMENT a
rn LOCATION:69TH AVE AND HAMPTON
CA TIGARD TRIANGLE STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN
CA 0
0
1.11 rl Il
_ _
�y
0 Zzz/I I I I I XXXX
10
At
Or
I d —
Y
f r
% -- -
chapter 4: plan recommendations
-r-3
rr T�� -
I I I I _ ----
Above: Pedestrian street featuring designated stormwater sites and LIDA facilities
Below: Pedestrian street with street trees and landscaping buffers
- -Nil -
i—tea
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 57
chapter 4: plan recommendations
Materials Palette Menu
The proposed materials palette SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
menu for the Tigard Triangle
outlines a list of options or
considerations for designing
and constructing new facilities " •
that meet the intent of street
types. The palette allows for
flexibility to match conditions
facing the Triangle, while STREET TREES AND STRUCTURAL SOILS
providing inspiration, creativity
and functionality in building new
streets and street elements.
ON-STREET
STREET AND PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING
DA STORMWATER
STREET FURNISHINGS
BRANDING AND IDENTITY
58 1 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
chapter 4: plan recommendations
IMPROVEMENTSSIDEWALK
-- i Sidewalks provide opportuni-
$' ► lllllli� it ties for human interaction, while
' maim�i
... �:
� �� providing safe and efficient
pedestrian travel. Sidewalks must
be designed for universal acces-
sibility, durability and drainage.
' Materials should be determined
based around one of the
following zones.
• Frontage zone: An extension
_ x
of the building where seating,
signage and other uses can
occur (top photo). This zone
can have contrasting accents
(such as dark aggregate or
4 pavers) to distinguish between
the pedestrian zone.
• Pedestrian through zone:
An accessible pathway that
�- - parallels the street and should
be a minimum of 5-7 feet
wide in residential settings, or
wider (8-12 feet) in commercial
areas (middle photo). With the
highest amount of traffic, this
' zone should use a smooth and
durable surface such as cast-in-
place concrete panels.
• Furnishings zone: Intended
for street trees and grates,
stormwater facilities, signage,
- street furniture and other
_•• pedestrian/bicyclist amenities
such as trash/recycling and
bicycle racks (bottom photo).
This zone can include use
of permeable pavement or
pavers, or soft paving such as
decomposed granite where
appropriate.
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 1 59
chapter 4: plan recommendations
CROSSINGS
Crosswalks, mid-block crossings
and intersections are important in
assuring the visibility and safety
of pedestrians, bicyclists, dog r
walkers, children and individuals -
r
using wheelchairs. Clearly
marked, articulated crossings are t
k ,+
also used to direct pedestrians
to designated crossing locations,
ideally where people naturally
assemble and have a desire to
cross.
The type of street where a
crosswalk is located dictates .• "
its design. Factors to consider
include crossing distance,
number of lanes, design speed F
of street, relationship of the
crosswalk to the destinations)
and topographic aspects that y
may improve or hinder driver =
visibility.
Design elements of crosswalks
that can improve safety and
visibility include median refuges
with raised crosswalks that
also act as speed humps for
car, crosswalk paint striping,
signage, change of pavement
types/color, pedestrian activated
RRFB (rectangular rapid flashing
beacons), and landscaping that
provides drivers cues that speeds
are slowing.
60 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
chapter 4: plan recommendations
STREET TREES AND STRUCTURAL SOILS
Given the need to provide
room to a multitude of street
a functions -travel lanes, sharrow
C '
or dedicated bike lanes, on-street
parking, and bulbout crossing -
the space leftover for street trees
can be compromised resulting
in narrow tree wells bound by
hardscape and utilities.
As a result, manufacturers of
structural soil systems have
responded with products that
allow for compact, highly utilized
street space with healthy,
established street trees. Structural
soil systems limit soil compaction
+' and are installed underneath
pavement to provide room for
' needed lateral tree root growth.
As a result, trees are healthier
jand have better protection from
a range of urban disturbances
(parked cars, nearby utility boxes
or lines, foot traffic) while the
quality of urban.
Education is needed for public
4; works personnel who maintain
and repair street utilities within
structural soil systems. The
- - modular design of structural
soil systems, however, makes
routine repairs and replacement
of street utilities very achievable
-r, = while minimizing disturbance for
pedestrians or drivers.
r t�
T I G A R D TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 61
chapter 4: plan recommendations
ON-STREET PARKING
Unmetered, on-street parking
is ample in the Tigard Triangle,
though typically underutilized
similar to many surface parking
lots. On-street parking design,
placement and related standards _
can and should adjust to provide " ;
this resource more efficiently with ;= '
less impact to all user groups.
• Clustered parking: Identifying
strategies to cluster on-street
parking where it tends to be
in high demand is one way to
improve its utilization.
• Marked parking: Marking of
on-street parking spots with _
paint be appropriate where
demand and turnover is higher.
• Use flexibility: In certain
instances, on-street parking
could be used for other '
uses, such as temporary or
permanent landscaping, bike `� X
parking or seating.
• Specific uses: Designating
certain on street locations for f
delivery parking only during
certain hours is good for
business efficiency and also
improves safety of drivers
by placing these spaces in
highly visible locations with
easy access to building or
warehouse entrances.
-
• Utility needs: Future t "-
electrical needs should also i
be considered for access to
-
parking meters or recharge
stations.
62 1 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
chapter 4: plan recommendations
STREET AND PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING
When specifying street and
pedestrian lighting, safety,
cost, aesthetics, and function
are always primary concerns.
Public works agencies across
the country are making efforts
to optimize maintenance and
efficiency of roadway and
pedestrian lighting by transition- F
ing to use of light-emitting diode
(LED) fixtures. While these fixtures -
have longer life spans and lower
operating costs, they also can
create undesired nighttime light
pollution.
The following should be _.
taken into consideration when
specifying street and pedestrian
lighting in Tigard Triangle:
• Use full cut-off shielded
(pointing downward) lighting
fixtures to keep light directed
at streets and sidewalks
• Retrofit existing metal halide
and sodium lighting fixtures
with shields and flat lenses
• Use only lighting sources
with correlated color
"temperature" no higher
than 3000K, which minimizes
blue spectrum light. Most
lighting products provide this
information on their package -
labeling.'
• Use centralized timers and
dimmers to control length of E
time and brightness of lights -
1 International Dark Sky Associa-
tion, Residential and Business Lighting
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 63
chapter 4: plan recommendations
LIDA STORMWATER
The desire to manage stormwater
in place is changing how streets
f F
are designed and function.
On site management using
low-impact development
approaches (LIDA) can also be
attractive to developers in that
they can lower project costs by
eliminating some piping and
engineering structures and
reduce need for excavation.
They can also meet Clean Water
Services' (CWS) stormwater
quality requirements for both new
and redevelopment sites.
Providing LIDA facilities may
qualify a project for credits
.
for green building or allow
the project to receive height _•
bonuses, reduced lot sizes, or - E
reduced setbacks. Reduced
operational and maintenance
costs for projects that feature
LIDA facilities is also an attractive
incentive.
Flow-through planters next
to large buildings can move
stormwater from a roof to a series - =
of infiltration planters or rain
gardens. In-street flow-through
planters and check dam infiltra-
tion planters along slopes are
all potential ways to manage
stormwater where it is generated. V° -
Different site conditions warrant
different LIDA facilities. Selection
should be based on criteria
established by CWS.
64 1 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
chapter 4: plan recommendations
STREET FURNISHINGS
As development continues to
make the Triangle a denser urban
environment, there is a need
to improve the amount, quality
and design of street furnishings - -�
along streets and intersections. -
Currently, there are just a handful
of locations where pedestrians - -
are provided amenities such as
seating, safety bollards, trash
receptacles and bike racks.
The look and feel of street
furnishings in the Triangle =_
should reflect the aesthetic and
function of surrounding land
uses: modern, campus and
worker oriented, with clusters
of key shopping destinations
and residential areas from which -
people stroll, walk dogs and ride r
bicycles.
Locations where people come
and go between classes and
offices could benefit from
addition of seating that is itself
a destination, using materials -
that warm in the sun and
r
provide various opportunities
for sitting, gathering, people
watching and relaxing. Other
furnishings provide a higher
degree of utilitarian use when ;
located near bus stops and street :I
intersections.
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 I 65
chapter 4: plan recommendations
BRANDING AND IDENTITY
A branding and identity strategy
for the Tigard Triangle will
enhance and attract investor ���
NOT�..
confidence in the area. It will also _
help workers, shoppers, residents -
and students orient themselves,
navigate and better understand
the area's identity, layout,
landmarks, transportation options
and major destinations. ,��
Typical elements of a district �► y
branding effort include an
assessment of character-defin-
ing features or assets, public
outreach and engagement plan,
a brand story and message, logo _
and style guide, and mock up
concepts for web, print, signage,
and guidelines for private sector
development. ..
A high degree of community
involvement must be met in
order for any branding and - n
identity effort to "stick" and be
adopted by a diverse community
of business owners, workers,
shoppers, students and residents.
Character-defining aspects to
investigate with the community �..
are the presence of Red Rock
Creek, the role of the Triangle as
a regional shopping destination,
and the strategic location of
the area bound by three major
highways.
i� }1 Y
66 I TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
appendices
appendices
Appendix A criteria, the owner/developer
will instead pay a fee in lieu
Funding Concept for of construction for frontage
Transitional Street improvements that typically
Improvements provide for sidewalks, crossings,
landscaping, street trees, street
The transitional street design furniture, stormwater conveyance,
concept is intended to provide and required curb cuts.
immediate, low-cost improve-
ments that facilitate pedestrian City staff and the consultant
safety and behavior change team took an opportunity at the
amongst roadway users. While June 27 charrette to determine
the improvements are temporary how the improvements and
and inexpensive, they are not maintenance for transitional
cost free. All street improvements street improvements could be
need funds for their construction, funded. Figure 1 on the following
permitting, periodic repair and page summarizes a three tier
maintenance. approach to funding street
improvements. Future discussion
The City of Tigard typically between the City, owners and
requires street frontage upgrades developers will be needed to
when proposed projects exceed refine the concept, as well as
a certain construction budget identify other challenges and
or trip generation threshold. opportunities in providing transi-
For larger projects that span tional street improvements in the
multiple parcels, the result can Triangle.
highly improve the pedestrian
environment and provide better
access to the project area and
adjacent areas, as well. For
smaller projects that meet certain
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 I 67
appendices
Appendix A
FIGURE 1: TIGARD TRIANGLE STREET IMPROVEMENT FUNDING CONCEPT
Large Medium Small
projects projects projects
• high trip generation • medium trip generation • no/low trip generation
• development permit • owner/developer pays a • owner/developer pays a
process requires full street fee in lieu of construction fee in lieu of construction
frontage improvements for transitional street for street frontage
per City of Tigard improvements improvements
standards for pedestrian,
• stretch extractions to • fee is an estimate
access and stormwater
streets provide transitional street of required street
improvements along improvements
• street improvements entire block frontage
• funds must be spent within
designed, permitted, a designated timeframe
constructed and paid for
by owner/developer • pooled funds are used to
• improvements directly provide City-initiated full
serve the project street improvements that
directly serve the project(s)
• improvements allow City
to take possession of full
R.O.W.
• City is provided some
degree of design
consistency along streets
for ease of operations and
maintenance
68 1 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
appendices
Appendix B
FIGURE 2: WALLGRAPHIC FROM INTERNAL CHARRETTEE
Tigard `rrgw e,
fl ti Is � a i.► c '! a ILZ S TT e 6 2-I ir4
M�Ea. E+ n U e,
t. T�iT L�a� �i �nna.w f�lf�1 QUF�rov�5 1
0, cm,S-rlwA d fuLA,ft,V
�a rl y Ik�� Gntib �xc$f"CraNh?aeh a�,c
� AG�fihlglLl�{?rr�nu�
Q f�hcv� nape rxrt�-� �, Sv+ I
f[�A1 WftT6'r.WGIFC� ��1-A`t
YE'�7�YCY-IAK FOtI+SGG
p i�Itvr��gN�n���nts
t -mv. !�w WLV"
ya�v �a14 -rNtirr+rn.�lt p0.wrt/s ttrf�l��
`�� ��� ,�S�R, ! ►sh�s�stn 15�y1/�+)C1�TRt�fn'�fu-naau �a�;n ,
fort
�•pa�'l�v-✓�7r1 f PlA2n.
� ArrnL�:��s�y F�FiY•sem '"`� vM�r,�kaY�
6� +�iru4Nh
LION
, � Ate+
`� ,�,�, 'PCACgS• • rn,m�
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 69
appendices
Appendix B
FIGURE 2 (CON'T): WALLGRAPHIC FROM INTERNAL CHARRETTEE
�j-f 21k.6T �h�l��-1 ?•lam� g�h�•h
04PA
1N40�
llu[ vis
����bpna�-iii � F�oFxrr;✓1HFa rnc���
•D ly hta r nufa. p1ss Tlyd-
4irt'z � cs�rx� � � ti ,�T�cra�wtt'�f -.'D 1�u Df aPr1�
A NveoPP +�u ��� M�u�Mui�lfte4 , �ur6/
�rnus "6°tPoop -0 y�,
,�rr�,,acnas +50t4Fa i
12 6th V;L
jo mo-WA'F• -Tvx
4WPT�c3"g Co's'
Dig%r r4=-r
70 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016 1 71
72 1 TIGARD TRIANGLE - STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN OCTOBER 2016
2018 Annual Report of the Town Center Advisory
Commission to the Board of the Town Center Development
Agency
December 1,2018
The Town Center Advisory Commission (TCAC) adopted annual goals and objectives for calendar
year 2018. The annual agenda for the TCAC was largely devoted to developing and implementing
the goals. This report is organized around the adopted 2018 TCAC Goals and Objectives.
Goal 1. Develop a strong knowledge base of the Tigard Triangle to inform our
recommendations for the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Implementation Project.
Outcomes:
The Commission started the year with a briefing from staff on the Triangle Urban Renewal Plan.
This was followed by a briefing on Triangle Equitable Urban Renewal. Several members of the
TCAC volunteered to serve on the Triangle Equitable Urban Renewal sub-committee which will
start meeting next year supported by the consultant team that was selected to perform the Metro-
grant funded project.
In September, Commissioners participated in a bus tour of the Triangle. Points of focus included
the condition of Red Rock Creek,locations of proposed SW Corridor light rail stations,traffic flow
and affordable housing.
Portions of November and December meetings will be devoted to a deep dive on the Triangle
including current demographics and economics, existing regulatory and zoning laws,and the
commission's future plans and recommendations.
Goal 2. Participate in educational and planning activities that result from the SW Corridor
Project to inform our recommendations to regional and local government entities.
Outcomes:
A large portion of the commission's time this year was spent on educating ourselves on all facets
of the SW Corridor Project so that we could make informed recommendations.
Members of the TCAC participated in a wide variety of SW Corridor planning activities including
serving on the Citizens Advisory Committee and giving public testimony. The TCAC received SW
Corridor briefings from staff and TriMet/Metro including a special joint meeting with the Tigard
Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC) in July.
Two commission meetings were dedicated to discussion of the impact of the preferred alignment
on the Urban Renewal Districts especially as it pertains to affordable housing and traffic
congestion. The outcome was a consensus opinion which formed the basis of our
recommendation.
The TCAC wrote a formal recommendation on the preferred alignment of the Tigard Triangle and
Downtown light rail stations and presented the recommendations to the Board of the TCDA at our
October joint meeting. It was also submitted to Metro and TriMet as part of their public outreach.
Goal 3. Identify and prioritize opportunities for development to improve walkability,
equity,and connectivity across both urban renewal districts.
Outcomes:
Walkability within and connectivity between the two urban renewal districts continues to be a key
issue for the commission. We received briefings on and participated in the SW Corridor planning
project which would provide a direct transit (and perhaps bike and pedestrian) connection
between the two districts.We need to ensure that stations are walkable and activate the areas
around them.
An observation from our bus tour of the Triangle is the lack of walkability in the Triangle,with the
exception of the path along Red Rock Creek adjacent to the Walmart development. The Triangle
lacks a Main Street area,but this could be overcome by clustering mixed use development into
blocks that would provide walkability and equitable business opportunities. This is something
that needs to be addressed in the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Implementation Project.
The TCAC October meeting included a discussion of equitable business. Some of the ideas
included:
• Developing funding for equitable business development perhaps from Federal and/or State
grants,lease income and facade improvement grants
• Tying affordable mixed-use development to business incubation space
Goal 4. Explore ways that policy changes can encourage and support the building of
affordable housing and equitable business development.
Outcomes:
Affordable housing is a critical part of the Urban Renewal plan and is of special interest to the
TCAC. The commissioners attended the Housing Options Workshop to give input on development
code changes that could encourage more affordable housing choices. We also received briefings
on the SW Corridor Equitable Housing Strategy,later acknowledged by Council. The TCAC will be
involved in the Tigard Triangle Equitable Urban Renewal Implementation Project,which will
2
explore how to encourage and support the building of affordable housing and equitable business
development.
The CPAH Red Rock Commons Project is an example of how urban renewal funds can stimulate
additional funding for affordable housing. We will continue to look for opportunities to partner
with developers and other agencies to increase the supply of affordable housing units.
The Town Center Advisory Commission is already looking forward to 2019 and the kickoff of our
key initiative:the equitable implementation of the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan.
On behalf of the Town Center Advisory Commission,
Kate Rogers
Chair
Recommendations for Town Center Development Agency Consideration
Background:
The Town Center Advisory Commission (TCAC) is charged with advising the Town Center
Development Agency(TCDA) on policy and projects related to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan
and the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan. The commission is charged with producing an
annual report and recommendations for the TCDNs consideration.
2018 Recommendations
• Continue to work with Metro and TriMet to ensure stations are walkable and activate the
area around them
o Ensure that the Hall Street station design and location promotes connectivity with
the Downtown Main Street area
• Look for opportunities to partner with developers and other agencies to increase the
supply of affordable housing units
• Budget for and acquire land in the Triangle for public spaces that encourage walkability
and equitable business development
• Develop opportunities for equitable business development in the Triangle through urban
renewal funding and other funding sources such as grants.
3
' Appe ix B
w >�
♦ 4 � , s
P �
,x
r
H
s-
mrpw M- _
H
♦ r •94W
LL
` V
a
- J
m
W
LU
44� Z
+ • •
rits+1r 4•� li
x � -'c�: •yam, .. 9.'. •��..-
� r -
f .or
1 1