Report T I G A R D .0 I V I C C E N T E R
E X E C U T I V E C 0 M M I T T E E
R E P O R T
HONORARY CO-CHAIRMEN:
Floyd Bergmann Wilbur Bishop
Daniel Larsen Alan Mickelson
Elton Phillips
CHAIRMAN: VICE-CHAIRMAN:
Dr. Chuck Samuel Gary Leon Fox, Sr.
MEMBERS;
Dr. Steven Alexander Yvonne Burgess
Betsy� Chick Allan Popp
Basil` Dmytryshyn Cliff. Speaker
Gerry Edwards Tom Taylor
Robert Gray Madalyn Utz
David Hughes J. Allan Paterson
Joan Barker Steve Slaybaugh
C. Vern Christensen Sharon Takahashi
Howard (Gerry) Duffy Frank Tepedino
Mary Payne Carol Weaver
Phil Hirl
STAFF.
Dennis Brun, Architect
Bob Moore, Financial Consultant
Linda Sargent., Administrative Assistant
Robert W Jean, City Administrator
1.
CIVIC CENTER COMMITTEE
Summary of Meetings
5/18/81 Civic Center Executive Committee/Committee-at-Large established by
City Council. Need for Library space explored.
6/18/81 Council meets with City staff on space needs and concerns regarding
a new Civic Center.
7/20/81 Council sets goals and guidelines for Committee per resolution of
City Council:
1. To review and study the Fanno Creek Park Master Plan by ORB
Organization that was approved by the Park Board and the City
Council in the spring of 1980 as the future site for the Civic
Center-Library complex. (To review this in light of today's
needs and economic realities. )
2. To review and study the possibility of the Crow Engineering
Building for a Civic Center-Library complex. (Work with City
negotiators on this. )
3. Compare this proposed site and building with others that might
be available within the City.
4. To work with City staff and each of the department heads to
determine the space needs of the City during the next 5, 10,
and 20 years.
5 To seek out professional help, with the authorization of the City
Council, to determine: a) space needs; b) appraisal costs; c) remodel-
ing costs of a Civic Center-Library complex by stages; d) full cost.
6. Review and give Council a composite cost of present City office
costs: a) City Hall; b) Library; c) Police Department; d) Muni-
cipal Court; e) other.
7• Develop and submit to the City Council a campaign strategy for voter
approval of a new City Center: a) total amount needed; b) expanded
Citizens Committee of several hundred; c) time schedule; and d) date
of proposed election.
8/13/81 Introductions/Background; review of ORB study; purchase of Crow Building
discussed.
8/27/81 On-site visit of Crow Building; discussion of scope of project.
9/17/81 Staff reports to Committee on space needs and development of alternatives.
.Expand/remodel existing City Hall
.Remodel leased space
.New building/Public Works site
.New building/alternative site
.Remodel alternative structure
.Purchase decentralized office space
.Lease decentralized office space
.Lease with option to purchase centralized office space
.Build big/look to future
2.
Staff presents space needs/manpower plan. Committee discusses
special needs for now/future; remodeling costs now/future; com-
parisons of alternatives; advantages/disadvantages of new construc-
tion.
10/1/81 Committee discusses community image and goals, centralized vs.
decentralized options, site alternatives. Alternatives limited
to downtown sites. Appoints sub-committee to select professional
consultant and to review site proposals.
Letters of interest and brochures received from 11 architectural/
planning firms.
Executive Committee solicits site proposals from interested parties.
10/8/81 Sub-committee members/scope of work selected.
10/12/81 Alternatives discussed; 9/17 presented to Library Board.
10/22/81 Staff reviews slides/materials from other communities on Civic Center
complexes with Executive Committee. Reconsider all alternatives.
Authorize sub-committee to select architect. Revise timetable.
11/3/81 Sub-committee meets to discuss criteria for evaluating architects
.Brochure/Summary letter
.Availability
.Itemized hourly costs/fee schedule/manpower allocation
Sub-committee directed to select three architects to interview.
11/5/81 Deadline for submission of site proposals.
11/17/81 Sub-committee reviews submittals from architects.
11/18/81 Library Board develops Library building criteria.
11/19/81 Sub-committee selects four firms out of 11 as finalists:
1. Brun/Moreland/Christopher
2. Fletcher/Finch/Farr
3. Koch/Sachs/Whittaker
4. SRG Partnership
Each firm gives a brief oral presentation. Committee moves to select
Brun group. List of sites offered to the City announced.
11/24/81 Architectural firm of Brun/Moreland/Christopher (BMC) introduced._
Scope of work discussed:
I. Architects are to review and make recommendations on space needs,
both present and future, for City services as well as potential
allocation of other space. (Basic information to be provided by
City staff, reviewed by architects, and referred to Committee. )
2. Architects are to consider options of total building program with
possible lease-back of currently unneeded space as opposed to a
building plan accomplished in stages over a period of time.
3. Architects are to review a full range of costs and/or policy
options.
3.
4. Architects will review physical sites as proposed, consider
merits of central as opposed to decentralized locations, and
make their recommendations to the sub-committee.
5. _ A detailed footprint of selected alternatives is to be provided.
6. Architects will provide information on financing alternatives
and make a recommendation on what they see as the optimum time
frame for obtaining funding.
7. Recommendations will be provided to assist the Committee in
promoting a community image via this Civic Center.
8. The contract will specify a dollar amount to be spent on this
footprint work.
Since the scope of work to be provided is somewhat more extensive than
originally planned, it may be necessary to approach City Council for
additional authorization and funds.
12/3/81 Staff meets with architect regarding Phase I contract.
12/3/81 Committee tours Lamb-Weston facility.
Downtown Revitalization Plan/Urban Renewal Plan presented to Council.
Phase I agreement approved.
12/8/81 Phase I contract presented to Committee. Guidelines for judging sites
developed by sub-committee:
1. Minimum size (2.5 acres)
2. Within the Urban Growth Boundary
3. On or near major arterial
4. Accessibility to public transportation - current or future modifi-
cations
5. Complementary environment
Of the 18 sites submitted, all but the following five were eliminated:
1. Crow site - 5 acres - $1,250,000
2. Public Works site - 3.2 acres - City-owned (85% out of floodplain)
3. Christ King Lutheran Church - 2.5 acres — $525,000
4. Air-King - 5.16 acres - $850,000
5. Hall Blvd. at Hwy. 217 - 2.47 acres - $485,000 -(possible additional
acreage)
Executive Committee agreed upon the Crow site, Public Works site, and the
Air-King site to be considered in the site analysis by the architect. The
Crow site will be considered in combination with the Public Works site,
and the Public Works site will also be studied as a single site.
12/15/81 Tour of Salem Civic Center.
12/17/81 Committee explores program/policy options. Debriefing on Civic Center
complexes.
4.
12/28/81 Committee explores site relationship to transportation corridors.
Recommends June 29, 1982, special election and tying up option on
Crow Building. Architect directed to complete site analysis on
split site and partial site with and without expansion. .
1/8/82 Report from sub-committee on professional services contract; site
selection; architect presents space needs, manpower projections.
1/26/82 Sub-committee reviews space needs with department head comments;
architect discusses site analysis; City Administrator discusses
campaign/financing strategy.
1/28/82 Architect presents policy options to Committee and timetable.
2/25/82 Site studies to Committee.
3/2/82 Schemes A and B presented by architect. Cost for real estate acquisi-
tion, roadway improvements, new construction, demolition and site
improvements explored for each scheme.
3/9/82 Site analysis, policy options, interdepartmental relationships, cost
presented. Review Phase I work. Recommend Phase II contract. Cost
- of City Administrator's recommendation for Scheme B and BMC's adjust-
ments to costs presented.
3/23/82 Phase I architect's services, alternative schemes completed. Site
analysis/cost estimates, policy options discussed. Possibility of
Teasing extra space explored.
4/6/82 Discussion of presentation of site program to Committee-at-Large;
campaign strategy.
4/13/82 Presentation of revised Scheme B by architect; campaign strategy
and presentation of program to Committee-at-Large for 4/20/82 meeting.
•
5.
CIVIC CENTER CONCEPTS
The Committee considered the overall concept of a centralized Civic Center, as well
as decentralized options. The Committee reviewed the 1980 ORB proposal for Tigard
and received materials about other Civic Centers in Medford, Oregon; Brea, Califor-
nia; Lake Oswego, Oregon; Beaverton, Oregon; and Pendleton, Oregon. Resource mater-
ials from the American Institute of Architects, American Planning Association,
International City Management Association, and other sources were used by the Com-
mittee in its work. The Committee had fairly solid concepts in mind by the time
the project architect was retained. The Committee's concepts were then further
developed by the architect.
The Committee and architect determined that a centralized Civic Center site was
preferred and should:
• Be a community focal point or image;
• Be a people place for more than just the transaction of government
business;
a Preferably be in the downtown area to enhance economic development
(although a City-wide site study was conducted) .
SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES FOR CONSIDERATION
Alternative 1. Expand or Remodel City Hall
The existing structure housing City Hall could be remodeled or expanded by purchasing
or leasing the space on either side of the existing structure and/or building an
addition in the rear parking lot of the structure. City Hall contains 3450 gross
square feet of space. The projected space needs for City Hall offices (Administra-
tion/Finance/Engineering/Planning/Bui.lding and Public Works Administration) at this
time are approximately 5000 gross square feet with space needs accelerating to 7330
gross square feet for the same departments in the year 2000.
Remodeling costs are estimated at $25 per square foot. To create an additionall550
square feet of space (5000 projected need-3450 present space) , cost is estimated at
$38,750. To accommodate the maximum space needed of 7830 square feet in 1990, cost
is projected at $109,500 to create 4380 square feet in additional space. The purchase
or lease of additional space and property may be incurred as a result of remodeling
City Hall.
Alternative 2. Remodel Leased Space (Crow Bldg. )
The Crow Building contains 6840 square feet of available office space. The space
-would accommodate City Hall offices (Administration/Finance/Engineering/Planning/
Building/Public Works Administration) until 1985.
At such point, the Crow Building could be remodeled at $25 a square foot to create
440 (7280 projected 1985 need-6840 present space) additional square feet at a cost
of $11,000. To accommodate the maximum space of 7830 square feet required for 1990,
cost would be $24,750 to create an additional 990 square feet of space. Also, cost
for leasing the space would be incurred at approximately $7.25 per square foot dur-
ing remodeling. ,
6.
Alternative 3. New Building at Public Works Site
A 35,663 square foot structure could be built at the Public Works site on the land
already owned by the City. This building would house all City offices, Police and
Library.
At a projected cost of $75 per square foot, the building could be constructed for
$2,674,725.
Alternative 4. New Building at Alternate Site (A-Boy Site)
A 35,663 square foot Civic Center complex could be constructed at an alternative
site in the City. The structure would house all City offices, Police and Library.
At a projected cost of $75 per square foot, the building could be constructed for
$2,674,725, plus the cost of the land acquisition.
Alternative 5. Remodel Existing Structure at Alternate Site (Air-King)
Owner plans to upgrade existing structure to accommodate municipal offices. Site
is 2Z acres. Leasing cost would be $6.50 per square foot.
Alternative 6. Remodel Alternative Structures (Lease/Option to Purchase)
A leased structure could be remodeled to accommodate City Hall's present and future
needs.
Given that a structure with 5000 square feet of space is located, remodeling costs
to create 1330 square feet of space for 1982 needs (6330-5000) would cost $33,250.
To accommodate the maximum space required for City Hall offices by 1990, remodeling
costs would be $70,750 in addition to the cost of leasing the space.
Alternative 7. Purchasing Decentralized Office Space
To accommodate present and future space needs for City offices, decentralized
office space could be purchased. An additional 1550 square feet of office space
would need to be purchased to meet 1981 needs for City Hall. Additional space
for Police and Library departments would need to be negotiated. The cost of
acquiring 1550 square feet would total $116,250. An additional 4380 square feet
(7840-3450) would be needed by 1990 at a cost of $328,500 ($75 per square foot) .
Alternative 8. Leased Decentralized Office Space
To accommodate present and future space needs for City offices, decentralized
office space could be leased at approximately $7.25 per square foot. An addi-
tional 1550 square feet of office space to meet 1981 needs for City Hall would
cost $11,238 per year. By 1990, the cost would accelerate to $28,130 (3880 square
feet) . Additional space would still need to be negotiated for the Police and
Library departments.
Alternative 9. Build Small with Land/Expand Later on Site
Alternative 10. "Build Big" With Vision to Future
7.
SPACE NEEDS AND MANPOWER PLAN
City Hall offices, Library, Police and Public Works Shops are the basic functional
space needs to be provided in the Civic Center. The additional concerns of "Tigard's
image" and "community facilities" were to be integrated into the design. To deter-
mine what was needed, the Committee reviewed: the existing space; a projected
20-year City staff manpower plan; the special department needs in general, and
Library and Police needs in particular. .
A phased project was considered to coincide with staffing and community growth.
The project architect later reviewed and modified the space needs with the Committee.
8.
EXISTING SPACE - 1981-82
expressed in square feet
_CITY HALL
Administration 250
Finance 1,750
Planning 300
Building 230
Engineering 200
Public Works 200
Computer Room 100
Vault 70
Xerox, storage, halls, r/r 350
Gross Total 3,450 (29 employees)
LIBRARY
Librarians Office 70
Circulation Desk 300
Staff Work Area 380
Shelving, Files, Patron Work Areas 3,750
Storage, Halls, r/r 500
Gross Total 5,000 (5.5 employees)
POLICE
Chief's Office 100
Lieutenant's Office 100
Detective's Office 300
Booking/Interviewing Room 75
Briefing Room 150
Locker/Shower 100
Dispatch Center 540
RecordsSupervisor's Office 75
Storage, Files, r/r 160
Gross Total 1,600 (28 employees)
PUBLIC WORKS SHOP
Superintendent's Office 50
Map/Tool Room 100
Staff Room 150
Storage, File, r/r 75
Garage
Office 100
Shop 700
Storage, Files r/r 200
Gross Total 1,375 (14.5 employees)
TOTAL EMPLOYEES - 77
a
9.
MANPOWER PLAN
1981-82 1982-83 1985 1990 1995 2000
Staff Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estin
(14,500- (18,000 (24,000) (28,000) (30,000) (32,C
16,500) 20,000)
EXECUTIVE
City Administrator 1 I I I I I
Admin. Secretary 0.50 1 1 1 1 1
Admin.Aide/Asst. 1 1 2 2 2 2
Totals 2.50 3 4 4 4 4
Staff/Population Ratio 1:5862 1:6000 1:6000 1:7000 1:7500 1:
FINANCE/RECORDS
Finance Director .50 1 1 1 1 1
Admin'. Secretary 0.25 0.50 1 1 1 1
Accountant Sr. 1 I I I I 1
Accountant I I 1 I I 1 1
Billing Typist 0.75 0.75 1 2 2 2
City Recorder 0.50 1 1 1 1 1
Admin. Secretary 0.25 0.50 l 1 I 1
Clerk II 1 1 1 1 l 1
Clerk II 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clerk II (Bldg. ) 0.25 0.25 0.50 1 1 1
Billing Typist 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.50 1 1
Totals 6.75 8.25 10 11.50 12 12
Staff/Population Ratio 1:2171 1:2182 1 :2400 1:24.35 1:2500 1
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
Cashier 0 1 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.
Receptionist/Switchboard 1 1 1.50 1.50 1.50 1,
Information Specialist 0 1 1 1 1 1
Computer Programmer 0 1 1 1 1 1
Data Entry Operator 0 1 2 2 2 2
Totals 1 -S- 7
7 7 7
Staff/Population Ratio 1:14,655 1 :3600 1:3428 1:4000 1:4285
LIBRARY
Librarian 1 1 1 1 1 1
Asst. Lib.-Reference 0.50 1 1 1 1' 1
Lib. Asst.-Childrens 0.50 1 2 2 2 2
Lib. Asst.-Technical 1 2 2 3 3 3
Lib. Asst.-Circulation 1 2 3 4 4 4
Library Clerk 1 2 2 3 3 3
Library Aide 0.50 1 2 3 3 3
Totals 5.50 10 13 17 17 17
Staff/Population Ratio 1 :2665 1 :1800 1:1846 1 :1647 1 :1765 1:1
?LANNING
Planning Director 1 I I 1 1 0
Asst. Planner 1 2 Z 2 1 1
Clerk II 1 1 I 1 1
Code Enforcement Off. 0.50 10.5
1 1 1 1
Totals 3.50 5 55___,__ 4 2.5
Staff/Population Ratio 1 :4187 1 :3600 1:4800 1:5600 1 :7500 1:
1281
• 1lH:yry�YL' it rL:�;v
(CONTINUED) 10•
1981-82 1982-83 1985 1990 1995 2000
Staff Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estima
(14,500- (18,000 (24,000) (28,000) (30,000) (32,00
16,500) 20,000)
POLICE
Chief 1 1 1 1 1 1
Lieutenant 1 1 1 1 1 1
Police Officer 1 1 1 I 1 I
Admin. Secretary 0 1 1 1 1 1
Records Supervisor 1 1 1 1 1 1
Comm. Services Off. 0 0 0 1 2 3
Clerk/Dispatcher 6 6 8 9 9 11
Sergeant/Detective 1 1 1 1 2 2
Corporal/Investigator 1 1 2 2 2 2
Police Officer/Invest. 1 1.50 2 4 4 4
Sergeant 3 3 3 4 5 5
Corporal 2 3 4 5 5 5
Police Officer 10 13 20 22 25 28
Totals 21 + 7 25.5 + 8 35 + 10 41 + 12 46 + 13 49 + 11
Staff/Population Ratio 1:697 1:705 1:685 1:682 1:652 1:1
(sworn) (sworn) (sworn) (sworn) (sworn) (swc
1:523 1:537 1:533 1:528 1:508 1:�
(total force) (total force) (total force) (total force)(total force) (tai
fol.
BUILDING
Building 'Official 1 1 1 1 1 1
Chief Plans Ex. 1 1 1 1 1 1
Building Insp. 1 2 2 2 2 2
Clerk II 0.75 1 1 1 1 1
Code EnforcementOff. 0.50 0 0 0 0 0"
Totals 4.25 5 5 5 5 5
Staff/Population Ratio 1 :3448 1:3600 1:4800 1:5600 1:6000 1
PUBLIC WORKS
Public Works Director I 1 1 1 1 1
Clerk II 1 1 1 1 1 1
*Clerk III 1 1 1 1 1 1
Public Works Supt. 1 1 1 1 1 1
Utility Worker III 1 1 1 1 1 1
Utility Worker II 1 3 3 3 3 3
Utility Worker I 1 1 2 3 4 6
Part-time Summer 0.50 1 2 3 4 6
Utility Worker III 1 1 1 1. 1 1
Utility Worker II 1 1 2 2 2 3
Utility Worker I 2 3 4 5 6 6
Utility Worker III 1 1 1 1 1 1
Utility Worker II 1 1 2 2 2 2
Utility Worker I 2 2 2 3 4 4
Mechanic 1 1 1 1 1 1
Utility Worker 1 1 2 2 3 3
Engineering Supt. 1 1 1 1 1 1
Engineering Tech I 1 1 1 1 1 0
Engineering Tech II 1 1 1 1 1 1
Engineering Tech III I 1 1 1 1 1
*Engineering Tech IT 1 Is 1 1 1 0 0
Engineering Tech II 1 1 1 0 0 0
Engineering Tech I 1 1 1 0 0 0
Engineering Tech I 1 1 1 0 0 0
Totals 25.50 29 35 36 40 44
Staff/Population Ratio 1 :574 1 :620 1 :685 1 :777 1:750 1 :
Currently vacant
11.
MANP01,'ER PLAN
1981-82 1982-83 1985 1990 1995 2000
Staff Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estima
(14,500- (18,000- (24,000) (28,000) (30,000) (32,OC
16,500) 20,000)
TOTAL.
City Hall 29 37.25 41 40.50 37 36.5
Library 5.50 10 13 17 17 17
Police 28 33.50 45 53 58 65
t Public Works 14.50 18 25 28 33 38
Totals 77 98.75 124 138.50 145 156.5
Staff/Population Ratio 1:190 1:182 1 :193 1:202 1:207 1:2
+ Excluding Engineering Staff, Public Works Director, and Clerks
{ 12.
f
R., D. L -1 Y
PUS11. � s C Phone 639-9511
12568 SW Main-Tigard, Or. 97223 MEMORANDUM November 18, 1981
TO: Civic Center Development Committee
FROM: Tigard Library Board
SUBJECT: Library Building Criteria
After careful consideration and discussion, and following consultation with representatives
of other library districts, the Tigard Library Board respectfully submits the following ,
criteria for a new library for the City of Tigard:
1. Siting
a. The library should be located in order to reflect that most library activities
and pursuits are literary, cultural, and esthetic and the environment should
foster and encourage these pursuits.
b. The building must be efficient and flexible, to meet changes in needs and
technology.
C. The site should be within an area commonly traversed by patrons and away from
noisy locations such as a fire station.
2. Size and configuration
a. The library should have at least 12,000 square feet of usable area, preferably
on one floor.
b. The space should be essentially rectangular and approach a square in proportions.
C. Provision should be made for future expansion to a minimum of 20,000 square feet.
3. Access
a. Adequate and safe foot passage should be provided.
b. Public transportation should be readily available.
C. Easy auto entry and exit should be provided along with adequate parking.
d. Handicapped persons should be adequately provided for.
4. Liveability
a. Adequate heating, air conditioning, and ventilation should be provided.
b. All areas should be properly illuminated for their intended uses with some
provision for natural light.
C. Sanitary, maintenance, rest, and conference space should be separate and adequate.
d. Alternate energy systems should be incorporated.
5. Esthetics
a. The exterior of the building should be esthetically pleasing.
b. The library should look like a "library".
C. Landscaping should be attractive and relatively care free.
d. Interior decoration and furnishings should be tastefully chosen and arranged.
6. Security
a. Adequate fire and access alarms should be provided.
b. Emergency access and exit should be considered.
C. Passage to employees parking should be exposed and illuminated.
d. The book drop should be incorporated in the building so that returns will go
into the building.
e. Patrons and staff should be visible when approaching and entering or leaving
the building.
Y
13.
1 � Phone 639-9511
12568 SW Main•Tigard, Or. 97223 Library Building Criteria
November 1981
I . General Statement
a . Location: Much information is contained in library literature
regarding the criteria for location of the library building.
"The basic criterion for location is : is this location one where
people cannot miss the library? . . . The library has to be more than con-
venient to users ; it has to be in a location where potential patrons will
stumble over it . . .To allow the library to function as an active community
institution the library must be where the action is . . . . It will have to
be on expensive property - property very desirable to commercial interests .
It does not have to be at the busiest intersection, but it should be
very close to it , and it must be in a natural center of pedestrian traffic
as well as near parking facilities for automobiles . With competition
for time , the library is going to lose if it is inaccessible . A beautiful
building isolated from natural traffic patterns will be a dead facility
unless there are potent reasonslwhich force its use . . . .The site should be
such as would be selected by a keen business man locating a book store ."
Libraries : Building for the Future . Chicago , ALA. 1967 , p . 27 .
"The site should be where the largest possible percentage of the
people to be served will pass the site frequently in the daily pursuit
of their normal activities . The site ' s surrounding land use should be
compatible with a library, and the size of the site should allow parking
and future expansion of the building . " Rochell , Carlton C . Wheeler and
Goldhor ' s Practi-<al Administration of Public Libraries ; rev. ed . New
York, Harper & Row, 1981 . p . 407 .
"The purpose of the building ( library) is to attract and serve the
greatest possible clientele at the least cost . " Wheeler , Joseph L . The
Small Library Building, No . 13 in a series of pamphlets , Small Libraries
Project , ALA.
The literature also refers to specific areas as being unacceptable , i .e . ,
parks and civic complexes are unacceptable , while shopping areas are
ideal . It is possible that none of these specific locations is better
or worse so long as the primary criteria is satisfied .
Tigard Public Library - Building Criteria - page 2 lit.
t
Each community is different . The library must satisfy tscommunity 's
expectations and needs . The library will also be subject to the resources
available in the community . Careful planning with the basic criteria
in sight at all times can develope the best library for this community
in the best location .
b . Space Requirements : These criteria describe each functional area
of the library. Floor areas are approximations based on the function,
furniture and number of occupants anticipated for each area. Two figures
are given — immediate need and year 2000. It is not intended that the
specifications on space be final but that they be used as guides only.
Floor space is expressed in square feet .
AREA NAME NOW 2000
Reference 650 1150
Quiet area 175 500
Adult Reading/Stacks 3790 6000
Audio-Visual/Periodicals 200 1000
Youn4 Adult 500 1000
Children' s Library 1550 2000
Entry & Exhibit 270 500
Service Desk 500 1000
Work Room 740 1200
Librarians ' Offices/ Small
Conference Room 275 475
Staff Room 120 170
Rest Rooms 350 700
Janitor ' s Space 180 200
Meeting Room 1800 2000
City Archives 100 200
Dead Storage/Utility Room 200 1000
11 ,400 19 ,095
The public service areas of the library are :
Reference
Quiet Area -
17,Reading /Stack
Audio-Visual/Periodicals
Young Adult
Children 's Library
Entry & Exhibit
Service Desk
Rest Rooms
Tigard Public Library Building Criteria - page 3 15.
The support service area are :
Workroom
Librarians ' Offices/Small Conference Room
Staff Room
3anitor '.s Space
Dead Storage & Utility Room
The auxiliary function areas are :
Meeting Room
City Archives
II . Interior Arrangement
a. Flexibility and the Modular Concept : The Public Services areas ,
except for the Rest Rooms , must be incorporated into what is essentially
one large room. The dimensions of this room must be based on the concept
of a 3ft . module--the length of a standard shelf . Length of walls and
spacing of support columns in the whole building should coincide with
the modular concept to minimize wasted space and lend flexibility to the
floor plan.
Flexibility will also be served by minimal use of fixed obstructions
Any walls contemplated for the Public Service areas should be movable
without a major remodeling effort and should not block visual access from
the Service Desk. Support Service areas should be clustered and convenient
to the Service Desk.
Flexibility is paramount in the evenfthat the library is built in
increments . As shown already, the floor space needed by year 2000 will be
double today 's minimum. if the library is built in increments, the
building design must anticipate this future expansion . The site will
determine whether this expansion is vertical or horizontal .
b . Floor Level Options : Ideally, the entire building would be on
one level but the site will largely determine whether the building will
have one or two levels .
The library may have to operate with minimum staffing at times . It
is therefore essential that all the Public Service areas (see above)
be on the same level .
Of the Support Service areas , the Librarians ! Offices and Workroom should
be on the same floor as the Public Service area . The remaining
Support Service 'areas , listed according to priority for inclusion on the
main floor are ;
iigara F'uolic Library Building Criteria page 4 16.
a . Janitor ' s Space
b . Staff Room
c . Dead Storage & Utility Room
Both Auxiliary Function areas can be on a separate level from the
Public Service areas .
It must be noted that a two-floor building will necessitate ( 1 ) two
sets of rest rooms , (2) an elevator , and (3) stairs and additional
exit( s) .
C . Visual Control. All the Public Service areas should be under
visual control from the Service Desk. Visual control is the design prin-
ciple most effective in forestalling minor disturbances , theft of materials
and vandalism in the completed building . The heights of furniture and
shelving units in these" criteria should be selected with this principle
in mind : Theit arrangement in the "one large room" of Public Service
areas , and the appropriate positioning and composition of any partitions
in this room, should also lend themselves Ito visual control from the Ser-
vice Desk . The entrance and emergency exits) should be in sight of the
Service Desk.
d . Sound: Interior finishing materials and carpeting should help
deaden noise in all Public Service areas . Furniture , 'stack, and partition
arrangements should also help block .sound from noisy to quiet areas .
Noise level relationships must be considered in locating the various use
areas . A list of Public Service areas from noisiest to quietest is as
follows :
a. Children ' s Library g. Audio-Visual/Periodical
b. Service Desk h. Quiet area
C . Entry and Exhibit
d . Young Adult
e . Reference
f . Adult Reading/Stack
e . Windows : There should 'be few windows : every interior wall is a
potential shelving space but it cannot be used if the wall is glass ;
windows create hot spots and leak heated air ; installation, maintenance
Tigard Public Library - Building Criteria - page 5 17.
and repair costs are high; sunlight damages books and furniture; glare
and uneven light makes reading difficult .
Windows may be used to : provide readers with a pleasant view;
invite people inside the library (windows in the Children ' s Library
or the informal reading part of the Adult Reading/Stack Area would be
inviting) ; windows would allow some recourse if the ventilating system.
f. Lighting: Careful consideration must be given to glare , contrast
and shadow control througIDut thelibrary. * Some areas , e .g . , stairs ,
storage , staff room, corridors , rest rooms , utility rooms , will need
only 25-40 foot candles of illumination while reading surfaces will require
75-85 , reduced only where architectural or psychological reasons require it .
Equal lighting over a general area is preferable to specialized lighting for
specific functions where such specialized lighting would reduce flexibility
in the floor plan.
There should be a master light control behind or near the Service
Desk; switches here should control all lights in the building . (except
those in the Meeting Room) ; a delay switch should allow library staff to
get to their cars in the parking area before lights in the area are ex-
tinguished . Some interior lights and lighting over some exterior doors
should remain on through the night .
g . Reating and cooling: The building should be heavily insulated .
Perimeter heating will not be practical because all wall space will or
could be used for shelving . The meeting room chould be controlled as a
zone separate from the rest of the library. Zoned heating/cooling should
also be used in parts of the building that , because of exposure, are anti-
cipated to be heating/cooling problems .
The building must be air conditioned . Noise from heating/cooling
systems must noc interfere with the operation of the library or intrude on
uses of the meeting room. Selection of the heating/cooling system will
be be a major decision.
For the comfort of patrons and the preservation of library materials ,
some sort of .5y.5tem-wide humidity control system should be considered .
a
Tigard Public Library - Building Criteria - page 6 18.
h . Car etin : Wall-to-wall carpeting should be included in all Public
Service areas and the Librarians ' Offices . Carpeting should be durable ,
easily cleaned , and be a color that does not show dirt .
This is a general statement outling some of the primary criteria
in planning for a building . A more detailed criteria will be developed
treating each functional area of the library. This will include:
a. Area name
b . Type and number of occupants
C . Required area in square feet
d . Functions
e . Relationships to other area
f Special problems
g . Built-in and movable equipment
19.
TIGARD CIVIC CENTER - SPACE NEEDS
COMMUNITY CENTER SQUARE FEET
Community Hall 2,500
Judge's Office 200
Jury Room 250
Kitchen/Service Area 1,020
TOTAL: 3,970
LIBRARY
Reference 1,150
Quiet Area 500
Adult Reading/Stacks 6,000
Audio-Visual/Periodicals 1,000
Young Adult 1,000
Children's Library 2,000
Entry & Exhibit 500
Service Desk 800
Work Room 1,400
Librarians' Offices/Small Conference Room 475
Staff Room 170
Rest Rooms 500 i
Janitor's Space 200
Meeting Rooms (2) 500 1,500
City Archives 200
Dead Storage/Utility Room 1,000
TOTAL: 18,895
CITY HALL
Executive
City Administrator 300
Administrative Secretary 200
Administrative Assistant (2) 250
*Attorney 200
*Secretary/Reception 200
Finance/Records
Finance Director 250
Administrative Secretary 200
Accountant Sr. 200
Accountant I 150
Billing Typist (2) 200
City Recorder 125
Administrative Secretary 125
Clerk II 80
Clerk II 80
Clerk II (Bldg. ) 80
Billing Typist 80
*Added to department's estimate of need
$Changed from department's estimate
t
20.
Finance/Records (Cont. ) SQUARE FEET
Vault 80
*Conference Room 225
Computer 300
*Reception 300
*Court Administration 200
Non-Departmental
Cashier 150
Information Specialist 125
Computer Programmer 80
Data Entry Operator (2) 150
*Conference 300
*Copy Center 200 0
Reception 250
Mail Room 200
Planning, Building, Public Works
Planning Director 250
Assistant Planner 150
Clerk II ( .5) 100
Code Enforcement Officer 100
Building Official 150
Chief Plans Examiner 150
Building Inspector (2) 200
Clerk II 100
Code Enforcement Officer 100
Public Works Director 150
Clerk II 100
Clerk II 100
Engineering Superintendent 150
Engineering Tech. I (3) 300
Engineering Tech. II (3) 300
Engineering Tech. III (1) 100
Conference Room 225
*Conference Room II 150
*Conference Alcoves (2) 100
*Vault 150
Drafting Area 300
Storage 600
*Paper Storage 100
*Reception 300
Urban Renewal Agency
*Staff (3) 450
*Secretary 150
Circulation/Mechanical/Janitorial/Restrooms 1,340
TOTAL: 11,645
*Added to department's estimate of need
•Changed from department's estimate
21.._
POLICE DEPARTMENT SQUARE FEET
*Police Officer 100
*Administrative Secretary 150 .
*Community Service Officer 150
*Clerk/Dispatcher (4) 400
Chief's Office 200
Lieutenant's Office 200
Conference/Prisoner Lineup/Multi-Purpose 600
Crime Analysis 420
Detective's Office 300
Division Commander's Office 375
Equipment Storage 200
S.I. Room 400 •
Squad Room Male 650
Female 300
Shower Room Male 160
Female 80
Physical Fitness Room 500
Briefing Room 240
Patrol Division Commander's Office 200
Records Room 500
Supervisor's Office 150
Communications Center 300
Police Library 200
Report Writing Room 225 •
Records (Microfilm) 350
Supplies 430
Evidence/Property 430
Armory 200
Firearms Range 1,440 Recommended not on premises
Equipment Room 250
Holding Cells 480
Prisoner Booking Room 180
Interview Rooms 300
Prisoner Dock 575 Exterior space
Reception Area 380
*Conference Room 400
Circulation/Mechanical/Janitorial/Restrooms 1,241
TOTAL: 13,656
GRAND TOTAL: 48,166
*Added to department's estimate of need
•Changed from department's estimate
22.
SITE ALTERNATIVES AND FOOTPRINTS
After determining what we wanted and what we needed as a Civic Center, the Committee
appointed a sub-committee to evaluate a series of site alternatives from all over
the City. Three preliminary sites were selected: the Air-King site at Burnham and
Hall; the Crow site on Burnham and Ash; and the Police/Public Works site opposite
the Crow site on Burnham and Ash. Site characteristics for these preliminary sites
were developed by the architect and reviewed with the Executive Committee. The
combination of the Crow and Police/Public Works sites were selected as the most
appropriate.
The architect was directed to prepare two site lay-outs or "footprints" showing how
the space needs and community uses could be arranged. One footprint was to use the
full site and relocate the shops; the other was to leave the shops on site. Plans
"A" (relocating shops) and "B" (with shops on site) were developed.
23.
v t,e r. meet
mow! y
N
I -
LU
p
w Al
I chamber
to P
c
� r
1. Lace -- 41
..tea_ ? it
LI L'
1', Ck Tower
Lake - e
f Futgq Creak � �%'
bridge
Tigard civic center Bryn
Moreland
Christopher
An Ntmtsa
frF{ ( Scheme A >o %v A,—
March 2.1982 R;,!,,q on 97205
E 503!222-5757
SCHEME A
24.
sv J Burnham Street
'� 8 1 (ice { •�:
t FU Expansion
IU, re L-btdr
j ;:•'\ taC Shops
i•ky ,
- ha�mbaer f xe6'i �.
..•. '' I F
uel
JAW
.�: Covered
r•,.-Y� Storage
top
i
• .
i t
iX,% f
Lake SA?- femo
Outdoor Storage
i •�+�' "S3 s x J t i
SCHEME B
24a..
T I G A R D C I V I C C E' N T E R
Bru--%',caelana Cra:stopner Architects pr, 20 Aord 1982 ►NOMM 1:40
S.a:.,.,,..cv..,,
INS smi
LK p
4 /L.
I
`Bur
At
Ocw n_:�ar•rir van �'�/• .RowtiW .��.�� � `{ rr -
Y
1
REVISED SCHEME B
25.
COST AND FINANCE
Although cost was a continuing point of concern throughout the study, it wasn't
until Plans A and B were developed and revised by the Committee that a null
range of policy options could be developed. It was determined that the City's
options as far as space needs were:
• Rent space as needed. . .$12.5 million total needed over the next 20
years and have nothing to show for it after 20 years. . .
• Purchase and remodel the Crow site for $3 million now, with the
second phase to be developed at a cost of another $3 million in 10
years when needed. . .$9.3 million total needed over the next 20 years
for principal and interest on $6 million project. . .
• Building Plan B now for $4.7 million and rent out excess space. . .$9.1
million total needed for principal and interest over 20 years. . .
• Build Plan A now for $4.9 million and relocate shops. . .$10 million
total needed for principal and interest over 20 years. . .
The Committee recommended building Plan B with the Public Works shops remaining
adjacent to the site. The architect had originally recommended demolition of the
existing offices on the Crow site for overall design and building efficiency rea-
sons, but the Committee directed that the offices be retained and leased out so
as to,lower the tax levy and total cost over time.
TIGARD CIVIC CENTER
Projected costs based on building Schemes A and B and Scheme B/Revised as presented
to Tigard Civic Center Committee, March, 1982.
Recommended
Scheme A Scheme B Scheme B/Revised
REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION
Crow Building and Lot #100 $1,250,000* $1,250,000* $1,250,000*
Frame House and Lot #2900 501000* 50,000* 50,000*
Land swap 7,200 s.f. of DWD access
Lot #2400 for 4,000 s.f. of Shops N/C N/C N/C
ROW purchase east of Fanno Creek 20,000* N/C N/C
TOTAL $1,320,000* $1,3009000* $1,300,000*
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Fanno Creek crossing $ 100,000*
Extend Ash to Burnham
LF 32' paving with 54' ROW 210,000* $ 170,000* $ 170,000*
Burnham 1/2 street improvement
LF 1/2 street, with no storm 50,000* 50,000* 50,000*
TOTAL $ 360,000* $ 220,000* $ 220,000*
CROW ITE
Demolish office portion of Crow
Building, Police office and House** $ 101000* $ 109000* $ 5,000*
Crow Building office remodel
27,000 s.f. 733,700* 733,700* 733,700*
Police office improvements 70,000* 70,000* 70,000*
Furnishings 85,000* 851000* 85,000*
Community Center 4,300 s.f./2,150 s.f. 2369500* 160,000* 236,500*
Furnishings 37,000* 37,000* 37,000*
Library Building 18,000 s.f. 9991000* 9991000*
Furnishings 160,000* 160,000*
Library Phase 1 only 12,000 s.f. 760,000*
Furnishings 105,000*
Building Subtotal $2,331,200* $1,960,700* $2,326,200*
Site Improvements
Parking, paving and lighting $ 71,200* $ 100,800* $ 100,800*
Landscape-Option One 100,000* 100,000* 100,000*
Landscape-Option Two 178,000? 178,000?
Paved walkways 150,000* 80,000* 80,000*
Covered walkways 22,000* 50,000* 50,000*
Public activity promenade 60,000* 60,000*
Performance Center 35,000*
Fountain 10,000*
Public art 65,000*
Sitework Subtotal $ 478,200* $ 365,800* $ 390,800*
TOTAL $2,809,400* $2,326,500* $2,7171000*
*Items included in totals
?Optional - not added in totals
**Changed in recommended Scheme B/Revised
N
d\
Recommended
Scheme A Scheme B Scheme B/Revised
PUBLIC WORKS SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Scheme A
Demolish existing structures $ 12,000* - ----------
4 acre land acquisition 400,000* ----------
New Public Works facility 9,020 s.f. 270,000* ----------
Covered storage 4,600 s.f. 46,000* ----------
New
------""New fuel station 42,000* ------
Security fence 8,000* --------- ------
Paved area for Public Works 107,000* ------ ----------
Impound lot: 20 cars 25,200*
Subtotal Scheme A $ 910,200* ------ ----------
Scheme B
Demolish sewage tanks -------- $ 2,500* $ 2,500*
Remodel shop 9,020 s.f. -------- 80,400* 48,000*
New pump station -------- 12,000* 12,000*
Covered storage 4,600 s.f. ------ 46,000* 46,000*
Impound lot: 20 cars
Land acquisition ------ 10,000*
Paving, fence, lights -------- 15,200*
Paved area for Public Works -------- 107,000* 107,000*
Subtotal Scheme B $ 273,100* $ 215,500*
Schemes A and B Site Improvements
Parking/paving $ 80,000*
Landscaping Option one same as
Option Two 58,000* $ 58,000* 58,000*
Screen wall ------ 13,500* 13,500*
Subtotal $ 138,000 $ 71,500* ,
TOTAL $1,048,200* $ 344,600* $ 287. 000*
Architectural/Engineering Services @ 6% $ 222,000* $ 156,000* 180,240`
GRAND TOTAL $5,759,600 $4,347,100
. $4,632,740
*Items included in totals
N
v
27a.
TIGARD CIVIC CENTER
Projected Budget for Full Construction
March 23 , 1982
Page One
Scheme B
REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION
Grow Building and Lot #100 $1 , 250 , 000
Frame House and Lot #2900 50, 000
Land Swap 7, 200 s . f . of•
DIVD access Lot #2400 for
4 , 000 s. f. of Shops N/C
Row Purchase East of Fanno Creek N/C
TOTAL $1 .300.00-0-
ROADWAY
1 ,300, UOROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Fanho Creek Crossing $ N/C x
Extent Ash to Burnham
-LF 32 ' Paving with 54 ' Rol! 170,000
Burnham 1/2 Street Improvement
LF 1/2 .Street, with no storm 50,000
TOTAL S 220, U
CROW SITE
Demolish Police Office and House $ 5,000
Crow Building Office Remodel
27, 000 s. f. 733, 700
Police Office Improvements 70,000
Furnishings 85 ,000
City Council Chamber 4, 300 s. f. 236 , 500
Furnishings 37 , 000
Library Building 18 ,000 s. f. 999 ,000
Furnishings 160,000
Library Phase 1 only 12, 000 s. f. -0-
Furnishings -0-
Building Subtotal $2 326 200
Site Improvements
Parking, Paving, and Lighting $ 100, 800
Landscape Option One 100, 000
Landscape Option Two _0_
Paved Walkways 80,000
Covered Walkways 50,000
Public Activity Promenade 60,000
Performance Center
Fountain -U-
Public Art
Sitework Subtotal $ 390, 800
' TOTAL271 ,000
Systems Development Charge
r
27b.
` Tigard Civic Center
Projected Budget for Full Construction
Page L
March 23, 1982
Scheme B
PUBLIC WORKS SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Demolish Sewage Tanks $ 2, 500
Remodel Shop 9020 s . f . 48,000
New Pump Station 12, 000
Covered Storage 4, 600 s. f. 46,000
Impound Lot ; 20 Cars
Land Acquisition _0_ x
Paving, Fence, Lights _0_ ,�
Paved Area for Public Works 107,000
Sub Total Scheme B _
Site Improvements
Parking/Paving -0-
Landscaping Option One _a_
Screen Wall -0-
Sub Total $ -0
TOTAL
ARDT�fiAL`� � ,
6% A & E Fee 180,240
$4,632, 740
Phase work using Utility funds
** Keep auto impound lot on- site until later date; investigate
legislation that would allow a towing company to keep autos on
their own lot which have not beenn involved in criminal com-
mission.
** Work by the Parks Department
28.
(1) Real Estate Acquisition
These cost estimates were provided by the City of Tigard.
(2) Roadway Improvements
These cost estimates were provided by the City of Tigard, Frank Currie.
Currie projected a cost of $250/LF, although recent bids in a depressed
market have been approximately $175/LF. This should cover all roadway
costs.
(3) Crow Site
Crow Building office remodel includes normal office improvement - lighting,
minimum partition, HVAC and exterior work. Police office improvement is an
allowance for special equipment such as lockers, special glazing and locks
associated with security.
Crow Building furnishings include open landscape partitions and 90% of
existing furniture.
Library furnishings assume no re-use of existing shelving.
(4) Site Improvements
Landscape Option One includes grading, 3-4" caliper trees, minimum shrubs
and seeding with automatic irrigation around the building and manual irriga-
tion in large grassy areas.
Landscape Option Two includes heavily planted areas around building and high
impact area with trees, shrubs, groundcover and sod. In open areas, trees,
shrubs and seeded grass will be provided. All sprinkling will be automatic.
Paved walkway with Promenade in Scheme A is larger than Scheme B as a result
of Promenade Concept. Public Promenade and Performance Center concepts are
interchangeable between schemes.
(5) Public Works Site
Required square footage for all buildings was provided by Public Works. Public
Works requests 80,000 s.f. of paved area. Brun, Moreland Christopher Associates
provided 58,000 s.f. on Scheme A and Scheme B, allowing for multi-use of the
maintenance vehicle parking for maneuvering.
The lot for impounded cars would be located on the acquired land for Public
Works in Scheme A. In Scheme B, the lot must be located off-site, requiring
additional land acquisition.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CIVIC CENTER POLICY OPTIONS
Fiscal OPTION "A" OPTION "B" OPTION "B-1" OPTION "L"
Year Expense Tax Expense Tax Expense Tax Expense Tax `
1982-83 * -0- -0- -0 $ 71,000 -0-
1983-84 $557,388 $500,000 $495,456 $450,000 $371,592 $370,000 $286,000* $186,000
1984-85 557,388 500,000 495,456 450,000 371,592 370,000 301,000* 201,000
1985-86 557,388 500,000 495,456 450,000 471,592 370,000 316,500* 216,500
1986-87 557,388 500,000 495,456 450,000 471,592 370,000 235,300 235,300
1987-88 557,388 500,000 495,456 450,000 471,592 370,000 338,500 338,500
1988-89 557,388 500,000 495,456 500,000 471,592 370,000 371,500 371,500
1989-90 557,388 500,000 495,456 500,000 471,592 370,000 395,500 395,500
1990-91 557,388 -500,000 495,456 500,000 471,592 370,000 424,500 424,500
1991-92 557,388 500,000 495,456 500,000 571,592 370,000 461,000 461,000
Sub-total: $5,016,492 $4,500,000 $4,459,104 $4,250,000 $4,144,328 0,330,000 $3,200,800 $2,900,800
1992-93 $557,388 $500,000 $495,456 $500,000 $371,592** $370,000 $642,000 $642,000
1993-94 557,388 550,000 495,456 500,000 619,548 620,000 694,800 694,800
1994-95 557,388 550,000 495,456 500,000 619,548 620,000 746,250 746,250
1995-96 557,388 550,000 495,456 500,000 619,548 620,000 808,500 808,500
1996-97 557,388 550,000 495,456 500,000 619,548 620,000 875,500 875,500
1997-98 557,388 550,000 495,456 500,000 619,548 620,000 990,000 990,000
1998-99 557,388 550,000 495,456 500,000 619,548 620,000 1,078,200 1,078,200
1999-00 557,388 550,000 495,456 500,000 619,548 620,000 1,156,500 1,156,500
2000-01 557,388 550,000 495,456 500,000 619,548 620,000 1,255,500 1,255,500
2001-02 557,388 550,000 495,456 400,000 619,548 600,000 1,354,500 1,354,400
Sub-total: $5,573,880 $5,500,000 $4,954,560 $4,900,000 $5,947,524 $5,930,000 $9,901,750 $9,901,750
20 Year
Total: $10,590,372 $10,000,000 $9,413,664 $9,100,000 $10,091,852 $9,260,000 $12,802,550$12,502,550
*$4.5M bond sale 20 years *$4M bond sale 20 years *3M bond sale 20 years *Leased space plus $100,000
@ 11% less $500,000 from @ 111/o less $250,000 from @ 11%. . .PW, parks & per year streets, parks
streets, parks and PW. . . streets, parks & PW. . . streets pay-as-you-go and PW. . .
in 1984-92. . .
21st year-no C.O. $. . . 21st year=no C.O. $. . . **Phase II bond sale NOTE: Lease payments
$3M. . . ($1.5M @ 8% continue in this option
NOTE: $8.6 million total NOTE: $7.7 million total inflation) 10 years beyond 20 years. . .
tax cost if rentals used. . . tax cost if rentals used. . . @ 11%. .
$247,956 + $371,592=
$619,549. . .
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES 21st year=no C.O. $. N
MARCH, 1982 NOTE: $8.9 million total
tax cost if rentals used. . .
30.
FINANCIAL OUTLINE - PLAN B
A financial outline for Plan B as amended was prepared by staff and reviewed
by the financial consultant working with the architect and Committee on the
project. A 20-year financial projection was prepared, along with an estimate
of the tax impact for the next few years.
It was determined that even with anticipated increases in the City's operating
tax levy, the Civic Center could be built for about $.40/$1,000 of assessed
value, and City property taxes could remain under the $2.00/$1,000 ceiling.
SCHEME "B" TOTAL PROJECT ►+
REVENUES: 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92
Beginning Balance -0- 2,710,000 300,000 75,000 40,000 41,000 111,000 198,000 293,000 412,000
Bond Sale 4,600,000(*) -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
Interest Earn. 300,000(1) 270,000(5) 35,000 5,000 3,000 3,000 10,000 18,000" 27,000 36,000
Rental Income 100,000(2) -0- 50,000(7) 75,000(8) 75,000 75,000 85,000 85,000 90,000 90,000
Tax Levy(**) -0- 335,000 405,000 550,000 588,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,000
Total Revenues $5,000,000 $39315,UUU $790,000 $705,000 $706,000 $731,000 $618,OUO $913,000 $1,022,000 $1,150,000
EXPENDITURES:
Debt Service 276,000(3) 615,000(6) 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000
Project Costs 2,014,000(4) 2,400,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 5,000(9) 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Total Expend. $2,290,000 $3,015,000 $715,000 $665,000 $665,000 $6209000 $620,000 $620,000 $620,000 $620,000
REVENUES: 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
Beginning Balance 530,000 620,000 605,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 610,000 615,000 620,000 625,000
Interest Earn. 30,000 50,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 30,000 10,000
Rental Income(10) 60,000 60,000 60,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 80,000 80,000
Tax Levy 612,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 -0-
Total Revenues $1,232,000 $1,230,000 $1,225,000 $1,225,000 $1,225,000 $1,225,000 $1,235,000 $1,240,000 $1,245,000 $1,230,000 $715,000
EXPENDITURES:
Debt Service 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000 615,000
Oper. & Maint. 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 -0-
Total Expend. $ 625,000 $ 625,000 $ 625,000 $ 625,000 $ 625,000 $ 625,000 $ 625,000 $ 625,000 $ 625,000 259000 15,000(11)
(*)If approved 6/82 and proceeds on 11/82...12% for 20 years... (7)TEK or offices...
(1)13% on available balance...land purchase on 1/83... (8)Offices and 6,000 sq. ft. of Library...
(2)$60,000 from TEK and $40,000 City... (9)Building repair and major maintenance...
(3)Interest only on $4.6M at 12%/20 years... (10)Offices only, Library fully used...
(4)$1.3M land and buildings, architectural services and start-up...bond sale costs at $15,000... (11)$100,000 Building Maintenance Fund; close-out from
(5)Available balance at 12% interest••• Bond Fund...
(6)Level principal and interest @ 12%/20 years...
(**)$375,000 @ 90% = $335,000...
$425,000 @ 95% = $405,000...
$475.000 @ 98% = $465,000...
$560,000 @ 98% = $550,000...
$6009000 @ 98% = $5889000...
$625,000 @ 98% = $612,000...
w
N
OPTION "B" TOTAL PROJECT 81-82 82-83 83-84 84-85 85-86
TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE: $ 628,800,000 $ 740,600,000 $ 852,800,000 $ 980,000,000 $ 1,130,000,000
TOTAL TAXES:
Tax Base 566,000 664,200 1,2.00,000 1,400,000 117.00,000
Debt Service -0- -0- 375. nnn_ 425.000 _ 475.000
City Levy 566,000 664,200 1,550,000 1,800,000 2,200,000
Loaves & Fishes 10,000 12,500 15,000 20,000 25,000
T.C.Y.S. 66,383 73,300 85,000 90,000 100,000
Bikepath 100,000 100,000 -0- -0- -0-
-TOTAL TAX LEVY $ 742,383 $ 850,000 1,675,000 1,935,000 2,300,000
Tax Base $ .90 $ .867 $ 1.40 $ 1.43 $ 1.50
Debt Service -0- -0- .41 .41 .44
City Levy .90 .867 1.91 1.84 1.94
Loaves & Fishes .016 .0.16 .02 .02 .0222
T.C.Y.S. .104 .103 .10 .09 .088
Bikepath .159 .134 -0- -0- -0-
TOTAL TAX RATE 1.18 1.12 2.03 1.95 2.05
1700 Sg, Ft. Average Home $ 75,000= 78,000= 82,000= 86,000= 90,000=
Civic Center Share: --0-- --0-- $ 33.62 $ 35.26 $ 39.60
Total City Tax: $88.50 $87.36 166.46 167.70 184.50
w
iv