Loading...
Natural Resource Assessment Report 1403 -03 _ NATURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT REPORT Tigard Library Prepared For: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 KURAHASHI CJ ASSOCIATES,INC. Civil Engineering WaterResources Landscape Architecture Planning Surveying 15580 SW Jay Street, Suite 200 Beaverton, Oregon 97006 Phone: (503)644-6842 Fax: (503)644-9731 August 12, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 STEP 1: SENSATIVE AREA CERTIFICATE FORM 2 STEP 2: DELINEATE BOUNDARIES OF SENSITIVE AREA 2 1. Wetlands 2 2. Intermittent and/or Perennial Streams 2 3. Springs 2 4. Natural Lakes or Ponds. 2 STEP 3: DETERMINE THE VEGETATED CORREDOR WIDTH FOR EACH SENSATIVE AREA 3 STEP 4: DETERMINE THE EXISTING VEGETATIVE CORRIDOR CONDITION 3 1. Identify the Plant Community Types Present in Vegetated Corridor 3 2. Select Representative Sample Points 3 3. Characterize Each Plant Community Type 3 4. Determine cover by native species, invasive species, and noxious species. 3 5. Determine Existing Vegetated Corridor Condition for Each Plant Community 3 6. Transfer Results to Base Map 4 STEP 5: ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS 4 STEP 6: PREPARE THE NATURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT REPORT 4 FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2: TAX LOT MAP FIGURE 3: WETLAND BOUNDARY MAP FIGURE 4: WETLAND DETAIL MAP WITH DATA POINT LOCATIONS FIGURE 5: PLANT COMMUNITIES APPENDIX A: SENSITIVE AREA CERTIFICATE FORM APPENDIX B: DATA SHEETS Kurahashi&Associates,Inc. August 12,2002 1 INTRODUCTION Kurahashi & Associates, Inc. has been contracted by the City of Tigard to complete a Natural Resource Assessment. The on-site study was performed May 3 and 22, 2002 just East of SW Hall Boulevard and North of SW McDonald Street (T2S R1W Sect 02 Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 500, 600, 690, and 1200) (Figure 1 and 2). The purpose of this study was to determine the possible environmental affects of building a public library on Tax Lot 600. STEP 1: SENSATIVE AREA CERTIFICATE FORM 1. The Tigard library is being proposed on a site that has sensitive areas consisting of wetlands and a tributary stream that flows into an instream pond both on site and within 200-feet of the site boundary. The completed Sensitive Area Certificate Form is attached in Appendix A. 2. Not applicable. 3. Sensitive areas were found, so continue to Step 2. STEP 2: DELINEATE BOUNDARIES OF SENSITIVE AREA 1. WETLANDS a. A partial wetland determination was made by Fishman Environmental Services, Inc. September 2001 for the City of Tigard. Brent Davis confirmed their 5 wetland boundary points and added 19 additional boundary points to define approximately 0.45 acres of wetland. The wetland boundary was flagged in the field and surveyed. A portion of the wetland boundary between points WL5 and WB17 is defined by the channel of the stream where it enters the subject property and runs east to point WB17 as mapped in the survey. 10 dataplots were established to determinate the location of the wetland boundaries. Additionally, a small seepage area is identified on the wetland boundary map (Figure 3 and 4). This wetland is confined to a narrow, deeply incised channel devoid of vegetation and was not flagged in the field, but was mapped in the topographic survey. b. A wetland boundary map is attached as Figure 3 and 4. 2. INTERMITTENT AND/OR PERENNIAL STREAMS a. In the southeast portion of the site,there is a perennial tributary stream that flows into an instream pond. The small tributary stream is incised approximately 1 foot upstream of the pond as it flows through the wetland on the site. The stream is assumed to be perennial because it has not been proven intermittent. b. The elevation of the top bank of the stream is well above the 2 year, 24 hour storm event. This area was delineated and surveyed. See Figure 3 and 4. c. Not applicable. The streams had defined channels. 3. SPRINGS a. No springs were found on the site or within 200 feet of the site. 4. NATURAL LAKES OR PONDS. a. Delineate the Outside Edge of the Sensitive Area Boundary 1. The pond is generally devoid of vegetation. 2. Watermarks were not observed. 3. Drift lines were not observed. 4. Waterborne sediment was not observed. 5. The instream pond is clearly man made as it is surrounded by a berm on three sides, however the pond has been in existence for some time and was at least partially constructed in existing wetlands. The pond surface elevation was surveyed at 138.0-foot elevation at the time of the Kurahashi&Associates, Inc. August 12,2002 2 study, but had been observed to be at 140.1-foot elevation earlier in the spring. Topographic mapping and observed drainage patterns indicate that the water overflows to the south at approximately 140-foot elevation. Saturated soils were only observed adjacent to the pond (dataplots 3 and 6), but drainage patterns and secondary indicators were present at the other wetland dataplots. Additionally, the presence of uplands adjacent to the seep in the very southwest corner of the site is confirmed by Data Plot 8, at the time of the field investigation water was present in the lower portion of the ditch, but it was not visibly flowing. b. The sensitive area boundaries were surveyed and mapped and can be found in Figure 3 and 4. STEP 3: DETERMINE THE VEGETATED CORREDOR WIDTH FOR EACH SENSATIVE AREA 1. The procedures in Chapter 3 of the Clean Water Service's Design and Construction Standards were used to determine the vegetated corridor width. 2. The Vegetative Corridors Boundaries were staked, surveyed, and mapped in Figure 5. This includes areas within 200 feet of the property line. The wetland data sheets were not used as representative points for the vegetative communities because they do not accurately represent the vegetative community in which they are located. STEP 4: DETERMINE THE EXISTING VEGETATIVE CORRIDOR CONDITION 1. IDENTIFY THE PLANT COMMUNITY TYPES PRESENT IN VEGETATED CORRIDOR a. Each vegetative community has been determined and described in Table 1. b. The location of each of plant community is mapped in Figure 5. 2. SELECT REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE POINTS a. A representative sample point was chosen for each plant community. b. Sample points were marked on the same map as the plant communities in Figure 5. c. A minimum of one sample point per acre was provided. 3. CHARACTERIZE EACH PLANT COMMUNITY TYPE a. At the sample points, a visual determination was made of all species that provided greater than 5%cover within the plot boundary. This is shown in Table 1. b. A 10-foot radius plot for herbs and a 30-foot radius plot for woody vegetation was used. c. The boundaries were adjusted to avoid any community overlap. These boundaries are shown in Figure 5. 4. DETERMINE COVER BY NATIVE SPECIES,INVASIVE SPECIES,AND NOXIOUS SPECIES. a. For each community type,the percent cover of native and invasive species was determined and is shown in Table 1. b. The cover estimates for communities with more than one sample plot were averaged and are shown in Table 1. c. Native species are as defined by the Portland Plant List. .. d. Noxious species are defined by the Oregon Department of Agriculture's Noxious Weed List and the Portland Plant List. e. Invasive species were limited to Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), teasel (Dipsacus fullonum), English ivy (Hedra heliz), nightshade (Solanum sp.), and clematis(Clematis ligusticifolia and C. vitabla). 5. DETERMINE EXISTING VEGETATED CORRIDOR CONDITION FOR EACH PLANT COMMUNITY a. Each plant community was evaluated and each specific plant community was analyzed and evaluated for "tier" analysis purpose. The Natural Resource Assessment revealed that all except one plant community in the development site is classified as degraded. One plant community is classified as good. This is shown in Table 1. Kurahashi&Associates,Inc. August 12,2002 3 b. Disturbed Upland Vegetated Corridor Condition Community 1. 0%cover by native species. 2. 0 %tree canopy cover 3. 60% is covered by invasive species and noxious weeds 4. Vegetative Corridor Condition=Degraded c. Hedge Row Vegetated Corridor Condition Community 1. 0%cover by native species. 2. 70 %tree canopy cover 3. 0% is covered by invasive species and noxious weeds 4. Vegetative Corridor Condition=Degraded d. Shrub/Scrub Vegetated Corridor Condition Community 1. 90%cover by native species. 2. 0%tree canopy cover 3. 0% is covered by invasive species and noxious weeds 4. Vegetative Corridor Condition=Good e. Residential Vegetated Corridor Condition Community 1. 0%cover by native species. 2. 30%tree canopy cover 3. 0% is covered by invasive species and noxious weeds 4. Vegetative Corridor Condition=Degraded f. Riparian Vegetated Corridor Condition Community 1. 30%cover by native species. 2. 5 %tree canopy cover 3. 70%is covered by invasive species and noxious weeds 4. Vegetative Corridor Condition=Degraded g. Pasture Vegetated Corridor Condition Community 1. 0%cover by native species. 2. 0%tree canopy cover 3. 10%is covered by invasive species and noxious weeds 4. Vegetative Corridor Condition=Degraded h. Reed Canary Grass Vegetated Corridor Condition Community 1. 0%cover by native species. 2. 0%tree canopy cover 3. 100% is covered by invasive species and noxious weeds 4. Vegetative Corridor Condition=Degraded 6. TRANSFER RESULTS TO BASE MAP a. The condition of each plant community is shown on Figure 5. STEP 5: ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS 1. Development is not proposed within 35 feet from the top of a ravine. Therefore, "A through E" does not apply. 2. A Tier 2 Analysis is not proposed 3. A complete RSAT is not required. STEP 6: PREPARE THE NATURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT REPORT 1. The report documenting the site and adjacent property sensitive area, vegetated corridor conditions, and slope has been completed. Kurahashi&Associates,Inc. August 12,2002 4 2. Table 1 has a description of the plant communities. They are also mapped in Figure 5. 3. The data sheets are attached in Addendum B. An RSAT was not required. The vegetative corridor analysis is included in this report and in mapped in Figure 5. 4. At least one copy of the site base map is included in this report. Kurahashi&Associates, Inc. August 12,2002 5 TABLE 1: VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES Plant Scientific Name& % Cover of Native Invasive/ Community Community Common Name Community Plants Trees Noxious Niche Rubus Discolor (Himalayan 60 X Disturbed Blackberry) Upland Festuca Arundinacea 20 (DU) (Kentucky Fescue) Bare Ground 20 DEGRADED Hedge Row Tilia americana 70 X HR (American Linden) DEGRADED Salix Spp 60 X (Willow) Cornus Stolonifera 15 X Shrub/Scrub (Red-Osier Dogwood) Physocarpus Capitatus (PSS) (Pacific Ninebark) 5 X Crataegus Douglasii 10 X (Douglas Hawthorn) GOOD Residential Landscape Ornamentals 30 X (Res) DEGRADED Rubus Discolor (Himalayan 40 X Blackberry) Crataegus Mongyna 20 (One Seed Hawthorn) X Salix Spp 10 X (Willow) Riparian Rosa Nutkana 15 X • (Nootka Rose) Rosa Eglantaria 10 (Sweetbrier) • Cytisus Scoparius 10 (Scots Broom) X Fraxinus Latifolia 5 X X • (Oregon Ash) DEGRADED Pasture Phleum pratense 20 (Timothy) Poa Pratensis 30 (Kentucky Bluegrass) Agrostis Spp 30 (Bentgrass) Alopecurus pratensis 5 (Meadow Foxtail) Kurahashi&Associates,Inc. August 12,2002 1 Festuca Arundinacea 5 (Kentucky Fescue) Taraxacum Officinace 10 X (Common Dandelion) DEGRADED Reed Canary Phalaris Arundinacea 100 X Grass (Reed Canary Grass) (RCG) DEGRADED Kurahashi&Associates,Inc. August 12,2002 2 U '•••, . ••.---.-• r----• •—-- : I a - : <1' . ' _\.‘ • — • 410',.,...-C•i4-•1".4 ' -1"--_ 1.14"\ , 7..,1,..1. ..„,,,. .... . ‘• I • *. ' - .. • : ' . ,,,,,Llifyiritrtzdtig.ortcl i ,,,,rf .. .. , s. - : ••, - . i_, ...• , :Greenbu , .. . • : : : 4' , 0114,:t ! • , ._:. -• *- '`: i: 1 . ,.... , •AA= \ f____ ... . , . . . , , • : : . . t.• . :. — .. • . . • - • , :.- -:-,- - :••••• . : I /. / : • . . .• rt-,1),, :::: -...•. •-..- : •••••••• .. •-. • .• •. . .: •• •-• • 001 .,1,0,• i...0 1 . •, - ' !.:*--:;\+!,;*•,. -; ...: . ..-. • • • • . • ••• . ...:",.. , -.,•• . •11 7.14,• .P., •. • . . , . ' ..,. , -, . • .: •. : :: .•.. • . * :• : ',::‘. •41, •-', '-' . •- . -.15....,.••• . • • A`,.• • V .b ..: ... ::'...'.. ''' '• Cr. •:. ',.-.7".4. '''' •-•,.. • :.;. .o.--, : t ‘ .. . . . •• ••• :•:••••• •• :..• :'.4 1. • • : :‘. .% 0 •• • . C•'• -''''r: • ..-..-'..... • , .. 1 . • 1111111.A .,,,: . ..-.... . .. `. •.. i••• •;.:.••• .. I.I. 1P :•:• • ..'‘ iS., . •• • -••• .:.. ‘0.1.....\ke'•V * \ '. i. ' • •' .• E." k'.4 ?33 L ....-— P•p*,...''''" ..'411r• • jo• ... ...g. * '•"#' .•; \ -----7' • • 4 '..--- .• .*, `- . .— -.11-Illir'.*-,,t"-;-- -.- .4-',,f,!,-. o : , • : sir ,! f..........: 4'. . .• „.., : ; : ,-.; • . NI* ,••• ,', ', , • -: 14 _• , ..•.• ; ...• • . •. --- • --- f,..--,:y$5.,,,,N • -• , - i \-_, ,i:...••-,' .,,•: : r. • \•:: . . - , • :it''-i : •: an ,;' :..L. ' 4:-..."---, • * .. :: . •-.7.-: ./„‘ I de...,'' ..'",\ :.. 4,4114,,,,_......,:. *ma i a ^4,-r'J;;''.." .• -. . I ": :: * . '''' \r.h.41;'4%,1) .e...-4., -r"''''‘,- t>it,',. .."4.,•:,----'• .. g • -,- .4.••• • . - - f t e•WiS , .... . . . 5i . .... -, ' h ' ' • • ' .••- -.'• ''. • • - .,..-. 0%.% a", . GA ,,.,ii. .."•• 4. a •., . .. • : 1 -, ,•,..,t,!.....:. v*,"s qv\fNk T '"4"&riv 1 \ "i(, -- - : '.,I I II :: • ,,,-•;:•7- - ‘, - ' ' --..,-*4•4 ' , • : :. , : - •A - •. .''N. %‘ Alt. — • •ti,it la, :. *••••••v i/ , - ,• • ••440. •i• [1:.1, 4, • diti'se` .1) ...^. j) .' ::-:.c. • . e z rt•:"-,040-•. .. , .o. 0. a a.. --, •,/,‘ , —: • .•,, 2 ... --,;,.• , • '''. .' /( i -••- ; — \ _ --,---4,. , • ::. ' 4) ,:x•-• - .-- , ., (--- \‘, 1 , .. . . •,-,....,‘ ..y.., ,. - , i , .2.......-4, ,,,- ..... . -• • • • . , -----.. . . • • ...,,,,, ..p. ...,, 4 /7' cc, •\ \, ';`,:.::::-.Y• • • 7•e- ''„' -: ' ": 0 "•' ..‘!''`7- ' ' ''" /, C`N \\--s ''''''' .:‘C•'•- • ; 4 : 11 '\lr' •\ - ., : • • , - ,„ .7,. . • i \ -F.....4., 1'0,4, ( ..ii ji •:sfi r.2 -.,,,,ji 1.Y... . .•' • •'.•'••• •'— .'-'• . • • '`..•—•'`N ' C V! ' i it Et I -"' ,.. ; - • * .-."' :--.4.' -..4'• : " -''''ts7- 4V i ., • . ' - . -,., 1 t \--.---•-‘,...: _,, ' • 7_4.. ;•\i: :. _,, , N.,• -: ':lionit.a",=-7::= ,_, •:',\ -- 0 -; " • ..:-.•• iz *.- ? •.;1•.:--_, -„„-• „ ="' -.„-‘'' ' -1 - , „.Ali ri- - . . . .. ,.. ,.1, . - , .„ , - taP. taxe ., , • 7m6iammil Wetland Delineation t 0 1000' 2000' E SCALE: 1"= 2000' N ' 111111111111 FIGURE 1 KURAHAS HI Vicinity Map Tigard City Library & ASSOCIATES, INC. City of Tigard Ma tagaisartag•Watar imam. Lanekaay•Aroanaetare • Mantua May 23, 2002 Ilarkaamastal•Warm* 1/5680 OW Jay Street.Butte 200 Drawn By: BHD Elearartaa.Orman woos o22s44-mme ra.003044-973, Project No.: 2057 Scale = 1:24000 (1" = 2000') Source: USGS 7.5' Topographic Series \.\ / / ---rte , — [2:.: \ \ \ c:\ / 11 \ \ \ 7 J ---...........z,-, \ Z Ve sN, ',-,.......... \ \ ic. W.-..,.00011. 1111 ! - • . . , 5a) T..\\ \ i sipok(mak II , ,ftiffiiiii ' WO —;"' 114 I f \ ..„... \ rode ' i� 14 :imI BO � IiI j 1— II 2010 \, -1 1200 ) ± I4g---- ' .-.- 401 1 — — F i 1 1 - -. . Iii • I� i. I TTTp..iiki — """ , , _ ___. Wetland Delineation ar , ffi FIGURE 2 VW as AMI „�. Imo. Tax Lot Map TigardCity Library � -%Ur n.,,ro,. landscape .�AraPlanning City of Tigard '8680 SW 200 76: May 23, 2002 c�> - I - 7 Drawn By: BHD 0 250 500 Project No.: 2057 SCALE: 1"= 500' Scale = 1"= 500° 4 ii '` ' `. ,- • II `\\\„.41-i t, # A r * \ . 1.; V : . + w ? { '1 ' ,tg _. r ',,. ` is 1 , .. . - 4? *; kte,,,,,,.# . I % t d L. ,,,...4N:41, -, sly O•MARA Ii. ,.:__.. t M r 44' • e ,j fi¢ \ plor -Y ,, .y .y,` , " I 441L>ei 1": "� `a A. _�' r�'O ,fit 140, , : 1 15t �4� l�.i 1,,. . -j 'S '"Rig. A : , ,,, '-,,,,,,okii... .„ .1, 4,0 . Wetl. olt ,ir< #~.ems�. _ �.... h , Ii t s Wit ._ � tar �� .'a ` #: z l 1 . f _� x Ditch with - �y I seepage ; t* flow `�, Wetland Delineation i -f- ‘ 71.1111.1.111 1OO 200 SCALE: 1"= 200' !ill" Tigard City Library KURAHASHI FIGURE 3 City of Tigard TM May 23, 2002 000Bee144-.° �44- 16600 SIP day Otroot,Salta 200 Wetland Drawn By: BHD Project No.: 2057 Boundary Map Scale = 1:2400 (1" = 200') Source: Aerial Photography (Soils from SCS) 1 . I -----' ,---- \ \ , •-,.. , ----.. ---- I } Wetland t .,...„ ..... ..,... ____ _ __ „.. .............. _.... , \ .<t- 1 ; --,..„_ .............. goundary k ‘, --.-. ....„ .......... I 1 i I \ ‘ Data Plot 5 ----1 i \ , ; il r. --,.,.„,,,' ,„,, VVB5 i 1 , . , .........., I 1 I 1 1 Data Plot 4 i 1 • / , i / \ . -.... 0 Data, Plot 6 --, i i ,,,.,,,‘„--,./.• . ./ .; ,iiiik\ ,,, i i: f „- . ./. • ./' ,/. / . . / IV WB6 / Data Plot 7 ', '1 1 1 ' ,/ / / / :„-- 4:--/\,,,' / / -/ / / --• - , . ! , , , • ,- s / . . " ' ,• • • ----- i ., . / 1. 1 t ,•,.;.., • • f . ,. / • • ), / ,Data Plot 31 / / / ..„,/, / I . • Data Prof 2 ..--• .„--- / ,.., ,. FER ,/ , ,„ , . , wg2 - , ,,,,' • ---- - , ,•-• ,,, / 4> ‘ . , / , . • / ................... Ditch with seepage flow ..-- . , s: •-_; : -/ /,-,-/- /...,-„.„/ -/,.„,, , , \ ,, / ...- ,...--- ...- .,... ,„„ , „ . ;,:„ / •/•• • •,/- / i• • \ k \ WB8 .. / / n, \ / i - . Data Plot 1 •,- . ........ ...._. ___ •--- WL4 ..---. --- ..., voe' ` .--- --- WL.3 ......„ . . .. _ // / / / / Data Plot 10 . ...a- .— ...._.. _.. - WL2 MA' ... . Ate4/: ,./w-AL- , ', / /// i I '..:.•-•;"-/ ' lir v4t3.9 1 X.,. ........... . .„, ,, 4/ / - -_,/ / /7,, ;or' .7 / „, / / . , , - , : 3,7 :/.-: , , i , 1 ,_,n.,,,,,,, ----- Data Plot 9 WL5 / // / ..,- / isTr4D rY/ I ' 'n,„v „" . . ../ < /-WB1G - i , -,„ ,.- \ 1 , /// / / / / V / / -""• - t / ''''' ' L• . ."' / '"'''''' 1 1 [* ':::':N r .., / / a/ /,.'/ / // / / '„ / / / / '''/ ' ••^ , . ,,,,Allgramtiiim ".<::, :" ,,„. '`•:.','''-:'', .....– ' •/ /i ;, / / --../"'/ / / Berm • -Wall— ...._ /// / / , I;3/4/4 , ...,... ..,_ ,. „ xs. i/ / , / / ....._ _ I 1 \ ...,""'" -., "... \ \ <,... /..,,,,' ,_.r., 1,,.. s........,...."....7,, ••%....,..z.. \,,,, ''.. . \--, • , / / ..„.. // / / ./.'.,/ NENNOMMINIMINOIRIElait , ,..„.. . , • / +*'', -?" "/ / / ,,,_ ....,,,_ ...-. ..--.. 2.....::-..,:,,, ."'""• -, '''', , ''`, \ .,.., I `,.. -. • • -.. .-7:77"-'' • • " -' - '' .,' ..-4.... • i '''' , '-'' ,. ...,....- --...... .. ' / -". •\AI // / „./ / .2 ../..„? -”- •--. ..s -• . ''': '''-•---- ''• ----=',• • .:,/ / /. / .. .,/ / / / / / / / 'Ng 1 4' ........... \ , .,,,,. ..,v.....,„ -•-.•, ,,„ ,,,. .\ , \ - --"" — . • . . —.. \ ?i, •',i( . ...„ ''''' ,,, \,..:`•-::.,-.. • '' \ \ N, - \\ Data IDA . — 8 ..... --- ..., s,., hi )110 -- . ___ -••••--- V ' , ----1 ---- __ _.-- -••••••, -_,. _ - .„.. ...: •-,„ ..,..... ' -..._......, "'---,. ----___ ' --.-• -'-' •,, , —c,',. '•,.. .---- -N, \ \ \ ,/ o o / •,. • . . ./ ........... 1 E.' 1 1 r ' tf --„ti C I / imirs „ , ......... ......"-- i ...„....„ „..,„ , „... ,,..,., „,.., \ .., \ , , , , . „ , \ . , .„ N.../ k 1 , el \ `• ...., . ',.. . 1 rilialaraill 1111162 KURAHASHI Tigard City Library City of Tigard Wetland Delineation HT I 0 20 40 SCALE: I". 401 8c ASSOCIATES, INC. May 20, 2002 Civil Engineering • Water Resources Drawn By: BHD Landscape Architecture • Planning Environmental • Surveying , FIGURE 4 15580 SW Jay Street, Suite 200 Beaverton, Oregon 97006 ( 03)644-6642 far (503)644-9731 Wetlanod Detail I Project No.; 2057 . Source: Field Survey Scale = 1:480 (1" = 40') I , , I . , , 1 4 4, ir , FF N\: 4\ f 8 1$* a+ I tq,4.100% Nit ,I,ir,,, . '''" - ' D U ..4 T,yy „ -4 lif .:\111111111111 - ., ...l'i $ 1 N .� „� Pasture "0 i'' -.. .� .,'� \ tea A I r t ' R ` Pasture �" • , r 14041.04r ,...,_ _ Study Limits Ni` 3 + t � '" , `. � - .V Pasture �: ,01. '4 •_---=1 'Pas:ure DP.•'�f :�° ., �' t � e oi;.2 DP6 ..,/.n 4., , i _... 41-' --rslit '—. ______„= - _,„....0,.:mfr moi,' ,. 1 i 5 1 , ® f k C�V i ; :fir OP.3 :,,;DPs DP9 1 ' 1i Wet and . , 0„4 =-- l -- :ou n df 4t: o f R Res. PSS11' - Plant Legend: Wetland Delineation D.U. Distrubed upland -Degraded71..;""1AI RCG Reed Canary Grass -Degraded HR Hedge Row -Degraded 0 150 300 WIF PSS Shrub/Scrub -Good SCALE: I"= 300' RES Residential -Degraded lIIIiIII Tigard City Library KURAHASHI FIGURE 5 City of Tigard . . .111.. . ChB may„."ger 24•00021 May 23, 2002 A'ron.° Plant Drawn By: BHD 16680 IV is Sheet.Butt*200 00 Communities Project No.: 2057 Scale = 1:3600 (1" = 300') Source: Aerial Photography (Soils from SCS) APPENDIX A: SENSITIVE AREA CERTIFICATE FORM Kurahashi&Associates,Inc. August 12,2002 CleanWater Services File Number r,.?�rtzF�z7a�rfri�tr�i ie r. Sensitive Areas Certification Form Property Owner Name City of Tigard (Vannie Nguyen) Address 13125 SW Hall Blvd City/State/Zip Tigard,Oregon 97223 Telephone Fax (503)639-4171 , (503)624-0752 E-mail vannie@ci.tigard.or.us Authorized Agent Name Kurahashi&Associates,Inc. (Gregory Kurahashi) Address 15580 SW Jay Street,Suite 200 City/State/Zip Beaverton,Oregon 97008 —. Telephone Fax (503)644-6842 (503)644-9731 E-mail gregk@kurahashi.com Project Location Street,road,or other descriptive location East of SW Hall,North of SW McDonald St,West of Fanno Creek,and South of Fanno Creek Park Legal Description: Quarter Section Township Range SE 02 2S 1W In or near(city or town) County Tax Map# Tax Lot# Tigard Washington 2S102DA00 100,200,300,500,600, 690, 1200 Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude Fanno Creek 3 4526' 30" 122f'45' 35" Adjacent Property Information: Street,road,or other descriptive location 1640 SW 87th Avenue Legal Description: Quarter Section Township Range SE 02 2S 1W In or near(city or town) County Tax Map# Tax Lot# Tigard Washington 2S102DD00 400 Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude Fanno Creek 3 4526'23" 12f 45'35" File Number An on-site,water-quality-sensitive area reconnaissance was completed on: Date By Title Company May 22,2002 Brent Davis Environmental Scientist Kurahashi&Associates,Inc. A.Existence of Water-Quality-Sensitive Areas As defined in the District's Design and Construction Standards,water-quality-sensitive areas: ®do ❑ do not exist on site(check appropriate box). ® do ❑ do not exist within 200' on adjacent properties,or❑unable to evaluate adjacent property(check appropriate box). • If water-quality-sensitive areas exist,complete Section B below. • If water-quality-sensitive areas do not exist,skip Section B,sign this form and submit to the District with plan approval package. B. Types of Water-Quality-Sensitive Areas The type(s)of water-quality-sensitive area(s)that occur on site or within 200 ft on adjacent properties are(check all that apply): ®wetland(s) ❑ spring(s) ❑ intermittent stream(s) ®perennial stream(s) ®ponds Sign this form and submit to the District with plan approval package and one(1)copy of the Natural Resources Assessment Report(information and forms are available through the District). • The Natural Resources Assessment Report includes: • Wetland Delineation Report per DSL/Corps reporting requirements(if wetlands present). • Rapid Stream Assessment Technique Form and maps or other District-approved assessment(if construction or discharge is proposed into,through,or across an intermittent or perennial streams). • Vegetated corridor documentation,including a base map and photographs showing the surveyed location of all sensitive areas,vegetated corridors,and vegetated corridor condition. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate. Property Owner: Vannie Nguyen G/Q n«• f 44i or , Print/Type Name Print/T e Title /z/ Zoe) Signature Date����( Date APPENDIX 13- • DATA SHEETS Kurahashi&Associates,Inc. August 12,2002 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site:1764AD �;> -�-/ Date: / r� ( Jj Applicant/Owner: C4, 9�,,G0 County: '�,+ -a6 7 State: /962 Investigator: /�gGF.r�--f24,4%5._ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? C-7. No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical Situation)? Yes ID Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes debPlot ID: (if needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION ` Species %Cover Indicator Species %Cover Indicator Trees Herbs 6 oSfl S _(i0 D , G J/CULL) tet -S ?.O 0 1-7-74c.,v1 Pf14 1 A-.ie,Y40/A9'C& l /0 W /}.C1/GiJ_S .c. 14G Shrub/Scrub ' pou' t 4 P ioS& z U Ort FAAJ- J�j 3 < �.' P=AC, Si 4J 344 10 1) Fes; gioicl ;am 1c.I47-v/1/1 Fi9G�,,1— CI4 74 i X1S 12 // 10 D Woody Vines Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) y/L /06% ID a Dort ouRA17 Pc , 012.0 Aci1, Remarks: P ru, /S li-C7-(%),F/' 6�4tG© HYDROLOGY Record Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: _Aerial Photographs _Inundation _Other _Saturate in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits ,1( Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: — (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves _FAC-Neutral Test ` Depth to Saturated Soils: (in.) Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: \Aii i a ,moi ' OF 3/4 ACL C.74eeK SOILS Map Unit Name � � (Series and Phase): /1c18E- ( -j /c.T t C4n4 Drainage Class: P R Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): -rime-, FR•A,f,> 44Jc'py- Confirm Mapped Type? Yes CO Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structures,etc 0 Al 10 /it 3/Z — 604/11 -IZ 47- ic-t 3 j2 14 2 `ljy Mg-SG; ISTIi'JC1 , 5i Go/1 rJ % 63,444 cot,froD#,lli rvJer _ iL-lk* 8 to* 31i 1OjZ '1/'l Caxz Dr pct $iL4 Loi4tni _ Hydric Soil Indicators: _Histosol _Concretions _Histic Epipedon _High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List _Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors X Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: beim i e-ose °i 1 Tr 4 to -IS l/JfrI Z Ge/-1,2c%^`'/3 (DX 1 a/ZCO /2"2, L A S S " WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No (Circle) Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? No Hydric Soils Present? s ' No Remarks: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: &A-/L,7 Gi1'-1 c,1849-02-1 Date: 473/02. County: �J Applicant/Owner: (�-,�{ ter- T�,g-Q�� State: � Investigator: 546 - Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? 'e No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes 6.. Plot ID: Z (if needed,explain on reverse.) • VEGETATION Species %Cover Indicator Species %Cover Indicator Trees Herbs 4r -5775 Tc n'rJ S 90 D F'1 Ic'on1 c1=4,CWAL&- <s— F4ccJ Shrub/Scrub Woody Vines Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) / / 7 / ,% ``D pd,04 (/1i 4r7- p&-R. Ste/`Z, ( JLL Remarks: P4sr zE (6 /-c-nJELI_ 6X742_67 HYDROLOGY Record Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: Aerial Photographs _Inundation _Other _Saturate in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks Field Observations: Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: — (in.) Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soils: (in.) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: /t©/Ggro S SOILS Map Unit Name Drainage Class: MoOkr 7 ./ L-05/4 (Series and Phase): QJAriclvH 1-00w4 Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): i44bciL i l& }p1.4kti2,g(,F5 Confirm Mapped Type? Yes eo Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structures,etc n - 0 4 to-74r(3fZ 51c-r C-01-44 /0 8 I o' 6/L.7--‘t W9-4 6040 Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol _Concretions _Histic Epipedon _High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) — Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (Circle) Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes Remarks: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Date: .13/o z.. Project/Site: 1-,l9�.p Gi.T.,{ C.1[z 44(4Coun Applicant/Owner: -'i�( dr- r`+C,�k-D h' Wi9SH. Investigator: e f26,-)1" U 6-L-(( State: DiC Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: (if needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Species %Cover Indicator Species _ %Cover Indicator Trees Herbs hj-/k Mi5 gkvW©.NgCGq Tt p ,040.1 Shrub/Scrub Woody Vines Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) //l /cO Remarks: t)0 HYDROLOGY Record Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: _Aerial Photographs Inundation _Other _Saturate in Upper 12 Inches _ No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: - (in.) Secondary Indicators: X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: - (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Saturated Soils: (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: MM©CK C j / s l'p A)G 5-e1 L d 4C-C-0 c4✓ �G/-.45.5 /vt 4--70, (Airel 4 L6Ei2 Bi2Ce4/C irk) yl66 i Sat- - Yop06k4,q/G 6/•zc"m<. r666' c0 SOILS Map Unit Name Drainage Class: te:eoitZ (Series and Phase): 1403ERL=-( Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): -Rip/6 Fes? auari-S Confirm Mapped Type? Yes e Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structures,etc 0-( Al le-ta 3/i fo'i<3/t :rr- a cE-t-) -as, /t-n L,94 (0 -1 42 IO* y/- - ./L- 5 6/0D 13..16+ 132' /o/p �1'/1 < '/2T u'h,ko-1 5 isr/cr Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol _Concretions _Histic Epipedon _High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils _Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: UT-1G ► r `{ Ell-s€44-6N AA 3 '' 4 (4_6"D 01T14- rr4lea_-rED net l9-TESL 141. . Ok/Prz o t'C N&Z5 WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? *C► No (Circle) (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? es No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland. �4e No Hydric Soils Present? kV No Remarks: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: k , f G ,� Date: 513/02 Applicant/Owner: r, r County: 1 PP a 4� ,� State: Investigator: Sari i Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? 0(..al No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Plot ID: (if needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Species %Cover Indicator Species %Cover Indicator Trees Herbs rive cos lsh�//fTvs Y© D pimi_A,Eth / 4NA/1 ¢(-G19 /0 A4.l,1t/ 4GP-'sr,5 reive"3 /0 F t& R4Nvv1cLtJ5 & NSf /0 61c 1. G9e ot3,v L.,Prig 4,5 &L Shrub/Scrub s(/.'c)5 u.s frf,-LJ l✓tv torfffi LA47LttOSw < — Tf94-ezT'O,✓L yue.G e„ �r- ic// i i1 o/3(c i ei-l4Tt)i14 f d e w' F 6,�0(//1r13 /O — Woody Vines Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) Z/2 =/ACS `2" /x/Pi Pile fro /VLts Remarks: /7/96TUR6 /S /f G Tic.%CO-7 6 X,9-2-EO HYDROLOGY _Record Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: _Aerial Photographs _Inundation Other Saturate in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks Field Observations: Sediment Deposits )('Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: _ (in.) Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves _FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soils: I I (in.) Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Drainage Class: ,4oP C-1, t.JWa_ (Series and Phase): pe-r A.r'x 14 l ur La Pt M Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): .01-QQwt,l-)L J4RPLo St ex-,94,67-_s Confirm Mapped Type? Yes �1 _ Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structures,etc 0 - j 41 io-(ie 3z- to-IA 31 I Ft)r,fiAi6 m co,' o.' 21]iijL L,�gs - ( 42 jj o`7" /L dbyiC `! / CJ✓f M0"3t u360,1-44)/1-45evismo r �,i-r j — 't. l� !J /i II - 'j(l1.Fl10 k '— _61464-A/1c, MacK --110+ E3/ ?,5(te'j (94 St cry a.4/ Hydric Soil Indicators: _Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon _High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils X Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: po b t 5 rv1ti-A) i✓t f'-O c 5e/L s Hi 5 rr<1 Cay U- ( /)iS Tv fie b WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? i o (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? No Circle) Hydric Soils Present? No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? a No Remarks: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Pro ect/Site: ate: J �t &A-go CrGc i�l /�//-��e P� County: 45/4 Applicant/Owner: &r OF j/, ✓-O Investi ag tor: ,Q6„)r 5,/fP State. p!Q Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Ts.§.7 No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical Situation)? Yes () Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes 1E) Plot ID: A- — (if needed,explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Species %Cover Indicator Species %Cover Indicator Trees Herbs - 1'u/3- /'IZ T E•JS iS /0 F46 7g =oLjjr P/1 "F&S5 _ Zo 2) FI ) e65 go 17 s TZ-70 las 2 7'77 9 T11,4 J vl t i cm-A.0'1 " 5 PAC.ti/ tfriJ4WZv Al0 r-/6t -& S AI/ Shrub/Scrub '-fOiL )13/u t✓b &/iii4,ry rvl aS FAg/ f— PeleWAr vcgzL, 1715(.4543 D c•ric- Woody Vines Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) _2/ = C'7`Zz DO4 rn-(4— R r� 60/26 6[. — Remarks: P&7 rIJerc.y HYDROLOGY _Record Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: _Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: _Aerial Photographs _Inundation Other _Saturate in Upper 12 Inches _No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Field Observations: Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: — (in.) Secondary Indicators: _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soils: OIL) Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: No /,JP(64-77 5 SOILS Map Unit Name I ) — (Series and Phase): &Oq.T-61-rvt j- �t--T LOA-1A Drainage Class: K� �l �A k Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structures,etc 0-- /4 o-(12 3/Z S i 401-,4 e -7,-J44 6 rc><(k s j3 /0 'f 414/ t42G pr J&-s 4 Hydric Soil Indicators: — _Histosol _Concretions _Histic Epipedon _High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing`Conditions • - Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: 13EF 4 , f1I31 it)( )0 e' 5Q8 30 I L. 4l l rH Pe3ittt0 tfeT6AG€IJ e-ou S WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? CO No (Circle) — Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (Circle Hydric Soils Present? Yes . Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes o Remarks: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: 1-'64i24 GtT` L t 13624/4-q Date: A licant/Owner: County: L`1A5 Fj PP C',t TSI �r I L/}2-p Investigator: P,Rc✓Y i D4.(1S State. pry Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: (� (if needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Species %Cover Indicator Species %Cover Indicator Trees Herbs � S i✓o,,J4-GGA �/O D F,q: 4J ( 11.'9-A17)-7-0S2 ri4c, RA-Am v6) , aEas - r- Jcs,0 &P L.0,3IUNd Cre 'rum. s' 14 4-t. MCAT/44 nAl-C"TS1.S h Shrub/Scrub ... Woody Vines Jif< P/.c0ay.< L✓ Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 3/3 t- /0) Remarks: i'R-5(Jxe 4 i 7JEV1 HYDROLOGY Record Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: _Aerial Photographs Inundation _Other _Saturate in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: — (in.) Secondary Indicators: X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soils: ( •) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: 7e24,0 SOILS Map Unit Name ���� (Series and Phase): t —�(3c Kt,,`( '5t(I- �g�y, Drainage Class: Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): --rt Pt c F'4-6!f u g Confirm Mapped Type? Yes co Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structures,etc 0 _I teg # 1Q V-- Zll CO'f2 414{ /inP°n iin'�N ivtetIO►vtt'� it-T C tu4nc !-1 AL 10g12, 211 5 IL-r LOA nh Hydric Soil Indicators: _Histosol _Concretions _Histic Epipedon _High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils _Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List XGleyed or Low-Chroma Colors KOther(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: 0)CcDi7EY) AM 'bc-S a- 6 v WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? tell No (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? es No Circle) Hydric Soils Present? `e No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? '� No Remarks: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: Ti& c G�z�{ c i ea. Date:Date: ` Z Applicant/Owner: G T� County: wA�i}. o t= i 9 R t� State: G1‹ Investigator: b,9 i 5 Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? CI No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical Situation)? Yes 6.' Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: 7 (if needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION • — Species %Cover Indicator Species %Cover Indicator Trees Herbs P*41-s htcLJ 4 i,l+A-GCf2 !0 f C A;) � rscr�s,�n 4#2.0Q,At t a FA - pa- E 6)20.HOC _ �v Shrub/Scrub (&6A- EC1Z6 Hne<2-i 4 't "D F4 ) )5 0460@INA i 0 .,..) _. Woody Vines iR tSC�c,01Z 12. 6-a .61(.0 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 112._= $- pµ6 ?FR SIV?-0 /2 ) Remarks: rnla)(7{ ns65 % s o 3s lAMla sNe D rex .Derv, Nr+ cc C-4.Gs. HYDROLOGY _Record Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: — _Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: _Aerial Photographs Inundation _Other _Saturate in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: -- (in.) Secondary Indicators: _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: — (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves _FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soils: ( •) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: 'Mb ie,-;0(Cala,s5 SOILS Map Unit Name •J Pc1._ (Series and Phase): l�FJ6Es S( Drainage_Class: Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): 1--(tab L Il-G ri--Q,DVF5 Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structures,etc 0-3 1 o•-42. 3t2_ — LADA-w, -- 16+ 7 5-`1 13 ba`l Hi t-1AGG lit ,6-E5 Ai Hydric Soil Indicators: — _Histosol _Concretions _Histic Epipedon _High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local Hydric Soils List _Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: a N Cb,,..10 1a-u a2 a G EJ DE- E-C.. p RV-PA 6-110 5 WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ,•. (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes o (Circle), Hydric Soils Present?. Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes �o Remarks: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: 176 LN Ct,- ,Qy Date: 51Z7102, Applicant/Owner: c41-4. p 1-16,402.0 Coun State:t}: ® �-/ ;!v� Investigator: 13( g,,,rlr- D, l�S Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? <MD No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical Situation)? Yes <IS> Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: t 8 -r(if needed,•explain,pa,reverse.). VEGETATION Species %Cover Indicator Species %Cover Indicator Trees Herbs 44,44.6 I4Rv vO(,J4 x}- �J D Fi56 .) c)I P/'',fe/vsis 2v a 4A) Shrub/Scrub Woody Vines Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) /Opp Remarks: HYDROLOGY _Record Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: _Aerial Photographs _Inundation _Other _Saturate in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Field Observations: Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators: XOxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Saturated Soils: ( ) —FAC-Neutral Test Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: ted M� Y '12 C i&AjQ55 rn s i f g P /i‘) .64409 SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase):4JkWAH j�C T604414 Drainage Class: Field Observations oot� Taxonomy(Subgroup):Ty'//& felCar4 Q TS Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structures,etc 0 _-7 ,_ ioYoe.3/1. — Ott r code % '7- 1`I 8! 10 yit 3/1 to,oz z Y( 60,04v.) C' tS ) E r,d iz.r( Ct 4.1(Atm t K-16 t- az lb`�l2 4/1 to 4� �{ ` �+ ( Cam GGd (vx-t. SSC T4 Hydric Soil Indicators: — _Histosol _Concretions _Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils _Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ _Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local Hydric Soils List _Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List xGleyed or Low-Chroma Colors J' Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Ok t D t u D gAtiQ. 0079v-' --(-S E. 7 rr 4 !, r cowc r,2/--I Lo rJ S WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?' era, No (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? CD No Circle) Hydric Soils Present? A' No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?40 No Remarks: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: 16,4z#53,4,./���t G�r� / Date S DZ . . County: 144.s ANGrey.) Applicant/Owner: G/Ty T 66 b1742,(> • Investigator: E5/q /%17— 5 State: 4004 Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? �e No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical Situation)? Yes IP Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes kb : Plot ID: (if needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Species %Cover Indicator Species %Cover Indicator Trees Herbs P te► l° E D Fe( ' 14cr� U tcIs P E' S.S 7O D F✓}C Afa4 is SOP co D =4c. 6-QJ� w) 4-4X6 SE LS FgL_ 14. .r o mr6ae.or,9- f acv T -x[LJi-t 0 'rcc 47J9•G6 10 /) fec v Shrub/Scrub Py C TS- Pip C u S e--(,4 reg 5" 194c Woody Vines Qv*45 ®l$roc.6/L l0 j, Ffk) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 315- 60 Remarks: 1461606-p / HYDROLOGY _Record Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: _Aerial Photographs _Inundation _Other _Saturate in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators: _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soils: (m•) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: 1'\Jd (A)P( 'QA-S SOILS Map Unit Name rr ,/ ` Drainage Class: (Series and Phase): l`t� l�i``( a- f M Field Observations Q..- Taxonomy(Subgroup). •NO(4, I4616/Ig-AZJ(PS Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structures,etc 0-13 a /trig. 2 -- /'3 1 r 6 t o'R — Hydric Soil Indicators: — Histosol_ Concretions • Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils T Sulfidic.Odbr `' Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions _-Listed on National Hydric Soils List 'Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors —Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) - Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (Cir ,. Hydric Soils Present? Yes �( Is this Sampling Point Within a V etlgod? YesCIDI Remarks: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Pro ect/Site: i ar e,' Date: 5121 l z 1 71� ci LiJrar � o� T;caotrd County: Lt�aS y„n�ton Applicant/Owner: Ci Investi ator: gree AaviS State: O reg oh Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (IV No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical Situation)? Yes ® Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes CO Plot ID: j (if needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Species %Cover Indicator Species %Cover Indicator Trees _ Herbs 4CEg: MACR66W4C,0141 /S serLd 7 s... m 4 7f,q o,4,1 3 O L /VG, t)(05 go bey 25- 0 FA ("id 5 C.4(FflL/d 1V feekiAD Shrub/Scrub '79Gv5 Ac-t.,/1-S// 20 jJ 6 Woody Vines f c)i9 15 SCOc c) D Std c9 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 2/_I 37)47.0 Remarks: HYDROLOGY Record Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: _Aerial Photographs _Inundation _Other _Saturate in Upper 12 Inches _No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators: _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: —' (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soils: Gm) Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: PV, I/`r7Jt Cq--r0Q-S SOILS Map Unit Name Drainage Class: (Series and Phase): )/���4G� 5 t4 �' Field Observations )'?9' Taxonomy(Subgroup): 1 / (1 //4G/ 671TS Confirm Mapped Type? Yes (1 Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structures,etc o - is e_a+,14-Kor r3 /o)g. 312. - Stir 6040.,‘ Hydric Soil Indicators: _Histosol _Concretions _Histic Epipedon _High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils — Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local.I-Iydric Soils List _Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ' Yes (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (Circle Hydric Soils Present? Yes N Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes ig Remarks: