Loading...
City Council Packet - 03/19/2019 1114 I u City of Tigard TIGARD Tigard Workshop Meeting—Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND TIME: March 19,2019 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Times noted are estimated. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting.Please call 503-718-2419 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request,the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171,ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: http://www.tigard-or.sov/citv hall/council meeting.oho Workshop meetings are cablecast on Tualatin Valley Community TV as follows: Replay Schedule for Tigard City Council Workshop Meetings-Channel 28 •Every Sunday at 12 a.m. •Every Monday at 1 p.m. 'Every Wednesday at 2 p.m. •Every Thursday at 12 p.m. •Every Friday at 10:30 a.m. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA I [aty of Tigard Tigard Workshop Meeting—Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND TIME: March 19,2019 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. WORKSHOP MEETING A. Call to Order-City Council B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. RECEIVE UPDATE FROM WASHINGTON COUNTY COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SERVICES 6:30 p.m. estimated time 3. RECEIVE UPDATE ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL 7:10 p.m. estimated time 4. RECEIVE QUARTERLY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UPDATE 7:30 p.m. estimated time 5. NON AGENDA ITEMS 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 7. ADJOURNMENT 8:00 p.m. estimated time AIS-3767 2. Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 03/19/2019 Length (in minutes):40 Minutes Agenda Title: RECEIVE UPDATE FROM WASHINGTON COUNTY COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SERVICES Prepared For: Marty Wine,City Management Submitted By: Carol Drager,Central Services Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall the City Council receive an update on Washington County Cooperative Library Services programs from WCCLS Manager Lisa Tattersall? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff Recommendation is for the City Council to learn more about this beneficial partnership between WCCLS and the City of Tigard. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Lisa Tattersall,Manager of WCCLS is presenting an update on the services WCCLS provides for the benefit of Tigard citizens. Halsted Bernard and Teresa Ferguson,Acting Co-Directors of Library Services will be sharing Tigard highlights from this partnership. OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Council received a report from WCCLS prior to the last countywide library levy. Attachments Presentation Washington County Cooperative Library Services Tigard City Council • March 19, 2019 Lisa Tattersall, WCCLS Manager: Halsted Bernard, Tigard Library Acting Co-Director & Circulation Manager Teresa Ferguson, Tigard Library Acting Co-Director & Technical Services Manager 0 Washington County, wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources �G ofv c WCCLS structure `' 31711 WCCLS = Washington County + 9 cities + 3 nonprofits Washington County provides: • Funding for local library operations: $24.7 million in FY19 aREGO\4 • Infrastructure to link libraries together and some centralized services County library funding: • 2/3 from County general fund • 1/3 from local option levy, which goes before voters every 5 years • Most recent levy was approved by voters in 2015, and runs through June 2021 0 Washington County, wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources Tigard Library Funding from WCCLS 59% from WCCLS in FY19 : 1 • Tigard Library Budget: $6,237,420 • WCCLS ( Pool 1 & 2) : $3,705,063 T I GARD o 0 Washington County, wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources 0 Member libraries , , ,_, .Q . Forest Park Aloha Hillsboro (x 2) 0 0 Banks North Plains Hillsboro 0 Q, Beaverton (x 2) Sherwood F,cm nqD) © Belton R_de.gl•;1111^ Cedar Mill (x 2) Tigard Hazelda 0 1+oma,. tfon Farmington Cornelius Tualatin 319 0 -��r• 1 Kenton Laurel Tigan Forest Grove West Slope S`l Krng City Tualatin River Durham National Garden Home But khea,on fu tualatic I Refuge... lad 0Washington County• wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources Cooperative statistics at a glance : FY18 1.7 million items in the shared collection of books, movies, music and more 15 million searches in the catalog 11.2 million checkouts: 1. million of these are digital books 3.7 million library visits 133,675 volunteer hours contributed to libraries 0 Washington County, wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources Tigard Library statistics at a glance : FY18 230,000 items of books, movies, music and more mi 1.2 million checkouts: 100,000 of these are digital books T I GARD 340,000 library visits 15,000 volunteer hours provided by 300 volunteers 384,000 library website visits 0 Washington County wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources What WCCLS does : outreach & youth services r L. . i. 1 Expert Help '`' f » , Live Tutoring sMrfit ^ we online help from expert tutors - - ^- _.,., 3411 ' e1,, : il'ss, i WCCLS .- �' 1,000 r • BOOKS s Before Kindergarten 11 ,1 i . " ' • k �=y lof . . , 1 A l'' , _. ,_ 4 - �s. Books Me Odra 1.161~011 0Washington County• wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources What Tigard Library does : youth services d %h III 600 programs including 375 story times 19,000 attendees _ ___ TIGARD -..,.., - ,,,0. 4,...-,,i):::, „,„,„ , d„,,, , -' Y 0 ,e, 6 NIPIIII \ �, .. 444 • , Itbooks! t' '�- ' -ZS 1-1:i '...*:.;:k Sq- 41111Done.•.— 70 Washington County• wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources What Tigard Library does : adult services ,, o„ . , r, -i'..;.. , , 1111 250 programs • ,,,..• . . i., . _.,,,v „7, . . , , ,,,„ . ,., 7,',/ iti.'1,kr'. '' •, 4,000 attendees ,, �-�, , I. T I GARD -"&. r, _ 4 __ • 1 a1RT �4b 111,,_ \ k,, ., ", ., j e‘ . . s _ ,,,00 , .. . ... 4. _ ,,,, ., V qty 4.-<vii, , ... ... ' - ,--- ..,.., �� 0Washington County• wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources What WCCLS does : library material distribution .. ... ,.......01-77-, -..,:: t_. -. -r daysweek Ai i., X41, _ z i - ' #, ` 10,000 items sorted isr • r �, _- - Iv I .. Over 50,000 miles les _ ..M. ' r � i, _ _\ ° '. '¢ , driven annually 0Washington County wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources What Tigard Library does : library materials handling .„, Oscar at work ' NI .111 1,150,000 items ____ 1. sorted annually ,� Tisto, T I GARD MR r h g y More staff time spent at public service desks 0Washington County, wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources What Tigard Library does : from patron to shelf Patrons checked in 460,000 items in , ,, 0 2018 k 24-36 hours faster „; T I GARD returning items to ,':.-- shelves with AMH ""� rc 0 Washington County, wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources What WCCLS does : network & library infrastructure Broadband for public internet access and imer in-library wifi, wireless printing, internet -Nie tria moo filtering Network infrastructure and support .„„ *** jzfr"'"• VOIr Library inventory management software & public catalog interface 0 Washington County, wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources What WCCLS does : countywide digital collections 10.38 0 e la 0 NONFICTION 5'UUIi Place Hold 4 ----- -- — HAPPINESS New Popular Recommended Popular at Your Organization WA' Play Sample n e e,,. Mus,s OF 214,41 Sa? HACKED i t� 4)) .IP 3nr Communication for Product Managers.:aI Jay Clouse _ -- Guild y4u1 o,Wuct management and communication skills.Learn now Your Happiness Was Hacked• ' rout o,oduct team.senor leaders.comperry penners.and customers. o WF a�c Vivek Wadhwa 47m 45s II Intemsedrete Views 2.508 Just now Females L11• f�of Allg? WA VI? 4)) Hi.The weather is nice today.isn't it? MONEY Place Hold ••••,yI �r11111111! - .. L1I.O °12? LIFE Play Sample REAL Real Recording School Weekly.th,arty cra �)ne ) --- RECUR I 't-__ Join the real-world school of music recording.Every Monday.Superste Yes.Did you come here on vacation? y�— Q SCL10 � 10 Crane introduces a new solution fora common recording cne',enge. ,P 3h 10m ■ Intermediate Views 20,957 11 hr ego wisio Your Money or Your Life Library ® Shelf 0Washington County wccls.org• Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources What WCCLS does : online services , ,,, I. ` t o Online catalog and website Live homework tutoring Viiith4 " , t '' Online library card sign-up \\\ """ Online fine payment , ' - 41 ... 0 Washington County, wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources Levy progress : new digital collections added a kanopy t Ord..., . .44100009-Htt...,.:.!o'k'ra 'Fi' V,:,t1,..7... liz,.;4iiiAqt, ".-A,-..-g'..,-....,60..,.i .,...j,::.,,.' . story Time:Literary Classics ,.,counL hIll/./Ar i .1%firlr:.r.:r, ,..4.,..4' 7 !Liberate yii:... the Dirty 0,t i 4 •. •, : .i1.414,0,', ' ..„, I it 1`., I,N, , „. ... , . Technology it It .". , . , ,....... WE LIVE IN PUBLIC ,. lk IIIIIIS . , wV 4 . .. .. I -'elk 444 );*- Or.' )1 PISMO 1 Y.,- , Don't Let the_ Curious Georg- Harry The Dirt- vg.rimi - 1 Cembeo redIcel 1 Sena lus,,,Ans en par, i 0.64•14 .,' , , ao. ' YStql5 "'TIP". r .ee SA,i Movies for Younger Kids 1 ',MP Mt qr., CI Pel,{1,PRESTP,00 Li:I , harlot.., AMAZING ' .., tit SP The Animal Kingdom . 7 ' 1 1111.1.12111.1111111 4 V .. ... • . TATI ORTIZ 41140 .. .,,,,,,,,, --,,,,, . MONASTERIO ...., ' leAft I, - . 'T . 1..a ',.. ,,, ADVENTURE , ---- Ore ,411 7 ------ LAS CUATRO TENDENCIAS AMOR', DESAMOR. C Eiiii3 KO ' *1, 1 , , -, „,.. ,i'..,..:. , Charlottes Web The Amaring_ Ron Voyage C- , ".1 Movies for Older Kids GRETCHEN . _ ',il(e' ;•Ei. R1. 5. '•., RUBIN 40 .400 P MUJER 480t . ., ..... . Cue,t.,cion,es I,L : Amor y clesernor en ef cer ,.. Lc rrepr err.,t, • , 11.... optstla* AcAT .. - e .-:, INPAIIIS Washington County Cooperative Library Services • wccls.org Connecting people, books & resources Levy progress : digital checkouts continue to rise ..• :,:: : : i .• •• . . . . . • . , ,_ . . , . • . _ 0 . C.... 02 A p° w vk's l �he X dice Za,000 di H Q o - - 9 L o 7 o z S ; o z ., _ -8 '' S t 1 g 0Washington County wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources Levy progress : automated materials handling (AMH ) , . „, r... . .r.----,,„.. . . ,;Hz., ,,..,, IA Pr'' ry - .......,,, ,t _. Ly' Yi ' {]a jj �' I R • w .. !IP ;i: rtior,,, �� t 4 , 1., ry71 1111”' p 1 b 'krl + it { ,�. N4 J+ F.. 4 f axa O. ,� ao- ///�Jj`I f �, 0Washington County wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources Levy progress : automated materials handling (AMH ) AMH has improved efficiency and we love it' The process is much quicker than before. 7 DAYS (,r PER WEEK;, 24.5 10,000 in STAFF HOURS ITEMS PER SAVED DAILY DAY Central COUNTYWIDE Sorting 0 Saves through time andAutomatic Much easier rmotto s. Materials rnotians. training for new staff and Handling at volunteers. WCCLS t 88% root a REPORTED WORKROOM BETTER FOOTPRINT WORKFLOW REDUCTION1 0 Washington County Rine towork onmore wccls.org • meaningful nitConnecting projects for people, books & resources Cooperative Library Services our community A new WCCLS catalog Our new catalogbrings together the best of the web "._` • • Grit g g s., The Power of Passion and Perseverance GRIT« byDuckwatRAngela and the best of your library :.••••, .-_-_, E„.....:-.,..::-,.. iii • Better search AUOIObOok CD•20t6i Unabridged. Available Yew details Place a Hold • Easy ways to browse: new titles, recommended 0 Preloaded Aadrobook-2016 I Unabridged. leis All copies in°Se Yiew details reads, award winners, and more Holds:1 on 1 copy > 0 00wnioaddl abie Auobook.2016 1 Vnabndged llU • Personalized experience: custom usernames, All copies In use Holds.65 on 12 copies RelUest this Download Book.2016 First Scribner hardcover editionk.1 shelves t o track your next reads All copies in use yiew..detail" Holds:15 on 26 copies .,a1.nd • One-click holds & library staff 0 Snip You Wait e recommendations 0Washington County• wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources WCCLS strategic plan development 2019 GET CLEAR GET FOCUSED GET MOVING coraggiogroup January - March March - June July onward 0 Washington County* wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources Next levy cycle : 2021 - 2026 Current levy expires June 2021 f a , A p of current levy rate will be on the I "'` � r,14:17..'- Renewal 6 ���' OFFICIAL ballot in 2020 (May or November - TBD) �,, A :.X -0- -_..! in3. :11,4":;', DROP SI7f 1 Summer Fall 2019: begin discussions about �1 w / glit o- Q we structure public library funding �,Lr13A OX ,.,.. ' :>� distribution for next levy cycle r,, oP ° '''' '' ,f od 0 Washington County, wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources Thank you ! 0 Washington County, wccls.org Cooperative Library Services Connecting people, books & resources AIS-3748 3• Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 03/19/2019 Length (in minutes):20 Minutes Agenda Title: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL Prepared For: Lina Smith, Community Development Submitted By: Lina Smith, Community Development Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Review proposed amendments to the Urban Forestry Manual. STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the proposed amendments to the Urban Forestry Manual be moved forward for public notice and review. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Urban Forestry Manual (UFM) was originally approved in 2013. The UFM consists of administrative rules that implement the urban forestry related code in Tide 8,Tide 18,and other applicable titles in the Tigard Municipal Code. The proposed amendments are based on feedback from Tigard residents, developers,and city staff,and aim to clarify the policies and procedures in the UFM. Examples of proposed amendments include: •Updating the wording and numerical Code references in the UFM to be consistent with the newly-updated Community Development Code. •Reformatting the section on minimum canopy requirements for new development, so requirements are no longer required by zone,but will instead be required by development type.This is to be consistent with the newly-updated Community Development Code. •Adding a canopy credit bonus for developers who preserve young native trees (less than 6 inches diameter at breast height). •Clarifying bonding requirements for trees in new developments. The full text of proposed amendments is included in the City Council packet.Text shown in bold, italic, and underlined is proposed to be added.Text shown in 3trikcthrough is proposed to be removed. • Administrative Rulemaking Procedure: Tigard Municipal Code Section 2.04.070 requires city staff to notify City Council of any proposed amendments to administrative rules. Council may: •Move the proposed amendments forward for public notice. Staff will review any public comments received.The City Manager will take into consideration the public comments,and may either approve, modify,or reject the proposed amendments. •Add the proposed amendments to the discussion agenda for the next available City Council meeting for City Council consideration or action. Staff recommends the proposed amendments to the Urban Forestry Manual be moved forward for public notice and review. OTHER ALTERNATIVES City Council could add the proposed amendments to the discussion agenda for the next available City Council meeting for City Council consideration or action. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS Tigard Urban Forestry Master Plan DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual PowerPoint Proposed Amendments to Adminstrative Rules a p Urban Forestry Manual TI G A R D Effective:XX-XX-XXX R, Introduction The Urban Forestry Manual consists of administrative rules that implement the details of the urban forestry related code provisions in Title 8,Title 18,and other applicable titles in the Tigard Municipal Code. The City Manager city manager has the authority to amend the Urban Forestry Manual pursuant to with the provisions in Chapter 2.04 of the Tigard Municipal Code. City staff has the authority to amend appendices in the Urban Forestry Manual without additional action by the City Manager or Council. The City Manager city manager or designee is authorized to administer the Urban Forestry Manual. Unless stated otherwise, all terms in the Urban Forestry Manual are as defined in Chapter 8.02 of the Tigard Municipal Code. Section 1 - Hazard Tree Evaluation and Abatement Procedure Part 1. Informal Reconciliation: If interpersonal communication is not feasible or is unsuccessful,the claimant mustshall contact the respondent by concurrently sending both a first-class letter ferlaf and a certified letter to the respondent that. (1)explains the reasons the claimant believes they believe there is a hazard tree on the respondent's property, (2) demonstrates how the claimant's life, limb, or property has the potential to be impacted by said tree,and (3)offers to negotiate a solution that is in compliance with all applicable rules and regulations,either directly or through a third party mediator. The claimant is encouraged to support their claim with documentation by a tree risk assessor. The respondent shall will have seven calendar days or lcs3 from receipt of the certified letter or 14 calendar days or less from the postmarked date of the first-class_feguktf letter,(whichever is sooner);, to respond to the claimant's proposal in writing by both first-class concurrent regular and certified mail. In order to become eligible for formal reconciliation, the claimant's letter must cite Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) Ssections 8.06.020 and 8.06.030, explain the respondent's written response deadlines, and include all of the other required elements listed above. Part 2. Formal Reconciliation: If the results of informal reconciliation are not acceptable to the claimant or there has been no response for 21 calendar days or more since the claimant sent the first-class concurrent regular and certified letters,the claimant may seek resolution through formal reconciliation by completing a hazard tree dispute resolution application, paying a deposit for all applicable hazard tree dispute resolution fees,,and providing the city all documentation of informal reconciliation including but not limited to Page 1 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX any letters to and from the respondent, proof of certified mail delivery,, and proof of certified mail receipt(if available). The city will shall use all readily available tools and technology when determining the hazard tree owner or responsible party as defined in TMC Tigard Municipal Codc Chapter 8.02. If the city determines that the claimant's previous correspondence was with the incorrect respondent, then the claimant must:than be required to complete the previous steps of the hazard tree evaluation and abatement procedure with the correct respondent before proceeding with formal reconciliation. If the claimant or respondent disagrees with the city's determination of the hazard tree owner or responsible party, the claimant or respondent must city shall be presented a land survey by a professional land surveyor that demonstrates the location of the tree in question in relation to property lines ••= -: . : -; .-. -• in order for the city to consider a reassignment of the hazard tree owner or responsible party. Once all the required application materials have been received Within seven calendar days of rcccipt of all the required application materials, the city will shall gain access to the respondent's property either voluntarily or with a warrant pursuant to TMC Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Gede,conduct a tree risk assessment by a tree risk assessor using the tree risk assessment methodology in Appendix 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual (UFM), determine if the tree is a definition of hazard tree, as defined in TMC Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 8.02 has been met and, if necessary, prescribe hazard tree abatement as defined in Tigard Municipal Codc Chapter 8.02. If the city determines the tree is a hazard definition of hazard tree has bccn met, the city will shall send both a first-class concurrent regular and certified letter to the respondent,explain that the tree has been determined to be a hazard treedefinition of hazard tree has been met,explain the required hazard tree abatement procedures,and require that hazard tree abatement be completed in a timely manneraeven calendar days or less from receipt of the certified letter or 11 calendar days or less from -- ;:.:- :: - - -- - ..: - - -- - - -- . The city will Shall also charge bill the respondent for all applicable hazard tree dispute resolution fees; and refund to the claimant any previously deposited hazard tree dispute resolution fees. If the respondent fails to complete the hazard tree abatement within the required timeframe, the city wiUslll gain access to the property either voluntarily or with a warrant,abate the hazard,and charge bill the respondent for the cost of abatement including administrative costs. The city mayef place a lien on the property for the cost of abatement, including administrative costs, pursuant to TMC Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code. If the city determines the tree is not a hazard tree definition of hazard tree has not bccn met, the city will shall send a first-class concurrent regular and certified letter to both the claimant and respondent explaining that the definition of hazard tree has not been met and close the case. Section 2 - Street Tree Planting and Maintenance Standards Part 1. Street Tree Planting Standards: A. Street trees must sill be planted in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the American National Standards Institute(ANSI) A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. Page 2 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX B. Street trees must shall have a minimum caliper of 1.51 2 inches or equivalent height at the time of planting. C. Street tree species must shall be selected from the street tree list in UFM Appendix 2, unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city manager or designee. D. Street tree species must shall be appropriate for the planting environment as determined by the City Manager city manager or designee and seek to achieve a balance of the following: 1. Consistency with previously approved street tree plans given space constraints for roots and branches at maturity; 2. Compatibility with space constraints for roots and branches at maturity; 3. Providing adequate species diversity citywide and reasonable resistance to pests and diseases;and 4. Consideration of the objectives of the current street tree planting proposal. E. Street trees mustshall be provided adequate spacing from new and existing trees according to the following standards wherever possible: 1. Street trees categorized as small stature on the street tree list in UFM Appendix 2 or by the City Manager city manager or designee mustsll be spaced no greater than 20 feet on center and not closer than 15 feet on center from other newly planted street trees or any existing tree that has been in the ground for over three years; 2. Street trees categorized as medium stature on the street tree list in UFM Appendix 2 or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet on center and not closer than 20 feet on center from other newly planted street trees or any existing tree that has been in the ground for over three years; 3. Street trees categorized as large stature on the street tree list in UFM Appendix 2 or by the City Manager city manager or designee mustshall be spaced no greater than 40 feet on center and not closer than 30 feet on center from other newly planted street trees or any existing tree that has been in the ground for over three years;and 4. Any tree determined by the City Manager city manager or designee to have a mature spread of less than 20 feet will sal be considered a small stature tree, and spaced accordingly when used as a street tree. F. Street trees mustshall be placed according to the following standards: 1. Street trees categorized as small stature on the street tree list in UFM Appendix 2 or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 feet from any hard surface paving; 2. Street trees categorized as medium stature on the street tree list in UFM Appendix 2 or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2.5244 feet from any hard surface paving; 3. Street trees categorized as large stature on the street tree list in UFM Appendix 2 or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 3 feet from any hard surface paving; 4. Not closer than 4 feet on center from any fire hydrant, utility box,,or utility pole; 5. Not closer than 2 feet on center from any underground utility; 6. Not closer than 10 feet on center from a street light*ftfielfer-d; 7. Not closer than 20 feet from a street right of way corner as determined by the City Manager city manager or designee. The City Manager city manager or designee may require a greater or lesser corner setback based on an analysis of traffic and pedestrian safety impacts; and 8. Where there are overhead utility lines, the street tree species selected must shall be of a type which,at full maturity,will not interfere with the lines;and Page 3 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX protect public safety and public or private property. G. Root barriers must shall be installed according to the manufacturer's specifications when a street tree is planted within 5 feet of any hard surface paving or utility box,or as otherwise required by the City Engineer city engineer. H. Street trees planted prior to the adoption of the most current version of the street tree planting standards willshall be exempt from the most current version of the street tree planting standards. However,the most current version of the street tree maintenance standards and the most current version of the street tree removal standards wilhhall apply. I. If street tree planting is required by another section of the UFMUrban Forestry Manual or TMC Tigard Municipal Code, the City Manager city manager or designee may allow for a fee in lieu ofplanting: - . . : : , - .- --" equivalent to the city's cost to plant a street tree per the standards in UFMSection 2,it art 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual and maintain a street tree per the standards in UFMSection 2,tart 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual for a period of three years after planting. Payment of a fee in lieu ofplanting will an "in lieu of planting fcc" shall satisfy the street tree planting requirement. Part 2. Street Tree Maintenance Standards: A. Street trees mustshah be maintained in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. B. Street trees must c,hall be maintained in a manner that does not impede public street or sidewalk traffic and meets consistent with the following height clearance standards apccification3 in section 7.10.060A of the Tigard Mxr-ticipa1-Cede incl: 1. 8 feet of clearance above public sidewalks; 2. 13 feet of clearance above public local and neighborhood streets; 3. 15 feet of clearance above public collector streets;and 4. 18 feet of clearance above public arterial streets. C. Street trees mustshall be maintained so as not to become hazard trees as defined in TMCChapter 8.02 of the Tigard Municipal Code. Section 3 - Street Tree Removal Standards Part 1. Street Tree Removal Standards: A. Street trees must shall be removed in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of theANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. B. The City Manager city manager or designee willchall approve the removal of a street tree if any one of the following criteria are met: 1. The tree is a `—`hazard tree as defined in TMC Chapter 8.02 and"hazard tree abatement'—' as defined in TMC Chapter 8.02 cannot be completed in a manner that results in tree retention consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. The tree risk assessment form found in UFM Appendix 1 must be completed by a tree risk assessor and submitted to the city. 2. The tree is dead. 3. The tree is in an advanced state of decline with insufficient live foliage, branches, roots,, or other tissue to sustain life. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met. Page 4 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX 4. The tree is infested with pests or diseases that if left untreated will cause the tree to die, enter an advanced state of decline,or cause other trees to die or enter an advanced state of decline. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met. 5. The tree has sustained physical damage that will cause the tree to die or enter an advanced state of decline. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met.If the physical damage was caused by a person in violation of TMC Chapter 8.08 of the Tigard Municipal Code, the city may take action pursuant to TMC Chapter 1.16 the enforcement process outlined in Section 8.02.030 shall be completed prior to approval. 6. The tree is listed on the nuisance tree list in UFM Appendix 6. 7. The tree location is such that it would not meet all of the street tree planting standards in UFMSection 2,harts 1E and 1F of the Urban Forestry Manual if it were a newly planted tree. 8. The tree roots are causing damage to paved surfaces,infrastructure,utilities,buildings,or other parts of the built environment. 9. The tree location conflicts with areas of public street widening,construction,or extension as shown in the Transportation System Plan. 10. Tree removal is required for the purposes of an approved building or land use permit, utility or infrastructure installation,or utility or infrastructure repair. 11. The tree is recommended for removal by a designated Fire Marshal fire marshal for Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue because it presents a significant fire risk to habitable structures or limits emergency access for rescue workers, and the risk or access issue cannot be abated through pruning or other means that results in tree retention. 12. The tree is part of a stand of trees,and a certified arborist or certified forester determines that thinning of interior trees within the stand of trees is necessary for overall stand health, the thinning will result in no less than 80 percent canopy cover at maturity for the area to be thinned,and that thinning of non-native trees is maximized prior to thinning of native trees. C. Unless removed for thinning purposes (Peart 1.B.142 al e) the City Manager city manager or designee will shall condition the removal of a street tree upon the planting of a replacement tree in accordance with the Street Tree Planting Standards in UFM Section 2, /tart 1_of the Urban Forestry Manual.The city manager er designee may cor idcr existing trees as-replacement trees if -- -- •.. • ::: • : - : •- , -, :-:•.:-, : -: . ation requirements in Section 2,part 1 and D. If the Street Tree Planting Standards in UFM Section 2, Priart 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual preclude replanting within the same right of way abutting on, fronting on, or adjacent to the property as the tree was removed or on private property within 6 feet of the same right of way as the tree that was removed,the applicant will sal be exempt from planting a replacement tree. Section 4 - Median Tree Planting and Maintenance Standards Part 1.Median Tree Planting Standards: A. Median trees must Shall be planted in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSIA300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. B. Median trees must slaa}l have a minimum caliper of 1.51 '/ inches or equivalent height at the time of planting. Page 5 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX C. Median tree species must shall be from the street tree list in UFMAppendix2,unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city managcr or designee. D. Median tree species mustshrall be appropriate for the planting environment as determined by the City Manager city manager or designee and seek to achieve a balance of the following: 1. Consistency with previously approved median tree plans given space constraints for roots and branches at maturity; 2. Compatibility with space constraints for roots and branches at maturity; 3. Providing adequate species diversity citywide and reasonable resistance to pests and diseases;and 4. Consideration of the objectives of the current median tree planting proposal. E. Median trees must sha l be provided adequate spacing from new and existing trees according to the following standards wherever possible: 1. Median trees categorized as small stature on the street tree list in UFM Appendix 2 or by the City Manager city managcr or designee must shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet on center and not closer than 15 feet on center from other newly planted median trees or any existing tree that has been in the ground for over three years; 2. Median trees categorized as medium stature on the street tree list in UFM Appendix 2 or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet on center and not closer than 20 feet on center from other newly planted median trees or any existing tree that has been in the ground for over three years; 3. Median trees categorized as large stature on the street tree list in UFM Appendix 2 or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet on center and not closer than 30 feet on center from other newly planted median trees or any existing tree that has been in the ground for over three years;and 4. Any tree determined by the City Manager city manager or designee to have a mature spread of less than 20 feet will 411 be considered a small stature tree, and spaced accordingly when used as a median tree. F. Median trees must 4l al be placed according to the following standards: 1. Median trees categorized as small stature on the street tree list in UFM Appendix 2 or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not-shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 feet from any hard surface paving; 2. Median trees categorized as medium stature on the street tree list in UFMAppendlx2 or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 252 1/2 feet from any hard surface paving; 3. Median trees categorized as large stature on the street tree list in UFMAppendix 2 or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 3 feet from any hard surface paving; 4. Not closer than 4 feet on center from any fire hydrant,utility box,or utility pole; 5. Not closer than 2 feet on center from any underground utility; 6. Not closer than 10 feet on center from a street light standard; 7. Not closer than 20 feet from a street right of way corner as determined by the City Manager city manager or designee. The City Manager city manager or designee may require a greater or lesser corner setback based on an analysis of traffic and pedestrian safety impacts; 8. Where there are overhead utility lines,the median tree species selected mustsl be of a type which,at full maturity,will not interfere with the lines;and 9. Any other standards found by the City Manager city manager or designee to be relevant in order to protect public safety and public or private property. Page 6 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX G. Root barriers mustshall be installed according to the manufacturer's specifications when a street tree is planted within 5 feet of any hard surface paving or utility box, or as otherwise required by the City Engineer city engineer. H. Median trees planted prior to the adoption of the most current version of the Median Tree Planting Standards willshall be exempt from the most current version of the Median Tree Planting Standards.However,the most current version of the Median Tree Maintenance Standards and the most current version of the Median Tree Removal Standards willchall apply. I. If median tree planting is required by another section of the UFM Urban Forc3try Manual or TMCTigard Municipal Code,the CityManagercity manager or designee may allow for a fee in lieu ofplanting "equivalent to the city's cost to plant a median tree per the standards in UFM Section 4, /tart 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual and maintain a median street tree per the standards in UFMSection 4,Ptart 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual for a period of three years after planting.Payment of a fee in lieu ofplanting will an"in lieu of planting fcc" sal satisfy the median tree planting requirement. Part 2. Median Tree Maintenance Standards: A. Median trees mustshall be maintained in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSIA300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. B. Median trees mustahall be maintained in a manner that does not impede public street or sidewalk traffic and meets consi3tcnt with the following height clearance standards specifications in section 7.10.060A of the Tigard Municipal Code including: 1. 8 feet of clearance above public sidewalks; 2. 13 feet of clearance above public local and neighborhood streets; 3. 15 feet of clearance above public collector streets;and 4. 18 feet of clearance above public arterial streets. C. Median trees mustsltall be maintained so as not to become hazard trees as defined in TMC Chapter 8.02 : -- • .-. •:, Section 5 - Median Tree Removal Standards Part 1. Median Tree Removal Standards: A. Median trees must3hall be removed in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version ofthe ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. B. The City Manager city manager or designee will sill approve the removal of a median tree if any one of the following criteria are met: 1. The tree is a ``hazard tree"as defined in TMC Chapter 8.02 and"hazard tree abatement'—' as defined in TMC Chapter 8.02 cannot be completed in a manner that results in tree retention consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. The tree risk assessment form found in UFM Appendix 1 must be completed by a tree risk assessor and submitted to the city. 2. The tree is dead. 3. The tree is in an advanced state of decline with insufficient live foliage, branches, roots, or other tissue to sustain life. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met. 4. The tree is infested with pests or diseases that if left untreated will cause the tree to die, enter an advanced state of decline,.or cause other trees to die or enter an advanced state Page 7 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX of decline. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met. 5. The tree has sustained physical damage that will cause the tree to die or enter an advanced state of decline. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met.If the physical damage was caused by a person in violation of TMC Chapter 8.08 of the Tigard Municipal Code, the city may take action pursuant to TMC Chapter 1.16 the 6. The tree is listed on the nuisance tree list in UFM Appendix 6 7. The tree location is such that it would not meet all of the median tree planting standards in UFM Section 4, Prarts 1E and 1F of the Urban Forestry Manual if it were a newly planted tree. 8. The tree roots are causing damage to paved surfaces,infrastructure,utilities,buildings,or other parts of the built environment. 9. The tree location conflicts with areas of public street widening,construction,or extension as shown in the Transportation System Plan. 10. Tree removal is required for the purposes of an approved building or land use permit, utility or infrastructure installation,or utility or infrastructure repair. 11. The tree is recommended for removal by a designated Fire Marshal fire marshal for Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue because it presents a significant fire risk to habitable structures or limits emergency access for rescue workers, and the risk or access issue cannot be abated through pruning or other means that results in tree retention. 12. The tree is part of a stand of trees,and a certified arborist or certified forester determines that thinning of interior trees within the stand of trees is necessary for overall stand health, the thinning will result in no less than 80 percent canopy cover at maturity for the area to be thinned,and that thinning of non-native trees is maximized prior to thinning of native trees. C. Unless removed for thinning purposes (Part 1.B.14-2 above) the City Manager city manager or designee willshall condition the removal of a median tree upon the planting of a replacement tree within the same median as the tree was removed in accordance with the Median Tree Planting Standards in UFMSection 4,Part 1_of the Urban Forestry Manual.The city manager or designee may consider existing trees as replacement trees if they meet all applicable species,size,condition, and location requirements in Section 4, part 1 and were not already required to be planted or preserved by the Tigard Municipal Code. D. If the Median Tree Planting Standards in UFMSection 4, Dart 1 : -- - :. - -: - :- .s preclude replanting within the same median as the tree was removed, the applicant wiUchall be exempt from planting a replacement tree. Section 6 - Sensitive Lands Tree Removal and Replacement Standards Part 1. Sensitive Lands Tree Removal Standards: A. Native trees in sensitive lands must shall be removed in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSIA300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. B. The City Manager city manager or designee will shall approve the removal of a native tree in sensitive lands if any one of the following criteria are met: Page 8 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX 1. The tree is a"hazard tree as defined in TMC Chapter 8.02 and`—`hazard tree abatement'—' as defined in TMC Chapter 8.02 cannot be completed in a manner that results in tree retention consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. The tree risk assessment form found in UFM Appendix 1 must be completed by a tree risk assessor and submitted to the city. 2. The tree is dead. 3. The tree is in an advanced state of decline with insufficient live foliage, branches, roots, or other tissue to sustain life. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met. 4. The tree is infested with pests or diseases that if left untreated will cause the tree to die, enter an advanced state of decline, or cause other trees to die or enter an advanced state of decline. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met. 5. The tree has sustained physical damage that will cause the tree to die or enter an advanced state of decline. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met.If the physical damage was caused by a person in violation of TMC Chapter 8.10 of the Tigard Municipal Code, the city may take action pursuant to TMC Chapter 1.16 the enforcement process outlined in Section 8.02.030 shall be co - : - -; ; : : . :: . . 6. The tree roots are causing damage to paved surfaces,infrastructure,utilities,buildings,or other parts of the built environment. 7. The tree location conflicts with areas of public street widening,construction,or extension as shown in the Transportation System Plan. 8. Tree removal is required for the purposes of an approved building or land use permit, utility or infrastructure installation,or utility or infrastructure repair. 9. The tree is recommended for removal by a designated Fire Marshal fire marshal for Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue because it presents a significant fire risk to habitable structures or limits emergency access for rescue workers, and the risk or access issue cannot be abated through pruning or other means that results in tree retention. 10. A certified arborist or certified forester determines that thinning of interior trees within a stand of trees is necessary for overall stand health, the thinning will result in no less than 80 percent canopy cover at maturity for the area to be thinned, and that thinning of non- native trees is maximized prior to thinning of native trees. C. Unless removed for thinning purposes (Peart 1.B.10 above) the City Manager city manager or designee will 4rall condition the removal of each tree in sensitive lands upon the planting of a replacement tree in accordance with the Sensitive Lands Tree Replacement Standards in UFM Section 6, Peart 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. D. If the Sensitive Lands Tree Replacement Standards in UFMSection 6,hart 2 preclude replanting within the same property as the tree that was removed, the applicant will shall be exempt from planting a replacement tree. Part 2. Sensitive Lands Tree Replacement Standards: A. Replacement trees must 4141 be planted in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. Page 9 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX B. The minimum size of a replacement tree must shall be 2 feet in height (from the top of the root ball) or equivalent to a 1 gallon container size. C. Replacement trees mustshall be selected from the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 thc Urban Forestry Manual. replacement trcc3 if thcy meet all applicable species, 3izc, condition and location requirements in - E. The location of replacement trees must3hall be as follows: 1. As close as practicable to the location of the tree that was removed provided the location complies with the other standards in this section; 2. No closer than 10 feet on center from newly planted or existing trees; 3. Trees categorized as small stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 15 feet from the face of habitable buildings; 4. Trees categorized as medium stature on the native tree list in UFMAppendix 5thc Urban Fore3try Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee mustslall be spaced no closer than 20 feet from the face of habitable buildings; 5. Trees categorized as large stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 30 feet from the face of habitable buildings; 6. Trees categorized as small stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5the Urban al or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 feet from any hard surface paving; 7. Trees categorized as medium stature on the native tree list in UFMAppendix 5 or by the City Manager or designee may not the Urban Forestry Manual shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2.52- i' feet from any hard surface paving; 8. Trees categorized as large stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forc3try Manual or by the City Manager eity-manager or designee may not not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 3 feet from any hard surface paving; and 9. Where there are overhead utility lines, the tree species selected must ahall be of a type which,at full maturity,will not interfere with the lines. F. The City Manager city manager or designee may allow for a fee in lieu of planting an "in lieu of planting fee" equivalent to the city's cost to plant a tree in sensitive lands per the standards in this Section and maintain a tree in sensitive lands per the standards in TMC Section 8.10.030 of the Tigard Municipal Code for a period of three years after planting. Payment of a fee in lieu of planting will an "in lieu of planting fcc" shall satisfy the sensitive lands tree replacement requirement. Section 7 - Development Tree Removal and Replacement Standards Part 1.Development Tree Removal Standards: A. Trees subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 8.12 must shall be removed in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. B. The City Manager city manager or designee willshall approve the removal of trees subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 8.12 if any one of the following criteria are met: Page 10 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX 1. The tree is a ``hazard tree'—'as defined in TMCChapter 8.02 and `—`hazard tree abatement2 as defined in TMC Chapter 8.02 cannot be completed in a manner that results in tree retention consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. The tree risk assessment form found in UFM Appendix 1 must be completed by a tree risk assessor and submitted to the city. 2. The tree is dead. 3. The tree is in an advanced state of decline with insufficient live foliage, branches, roots, or other tissue to sustain life. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met. 4. The tree is infested with pests or diseases that if left untreated will cause the tree to die, enter an advanced state of decline,or cause other trees to die or enter an advanced state of decline. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met. 5. The tree has sustained physical damage that will cause the tree to die or enter an advanced state of decline. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met.If the physical damage was caused by a person in violation of TMC Chapter 8.12 of the Tigard Municipal Code, the city may take action pursuant to TMC Chapter 1.16 the enforcement proccss outlined in Section 8.02.030 shall be completed prior to approval. 6. The tree is listed in the nuisance tree list in UFM Appendix 6. 7. The tree roots are causing damage to paved surfaces,infrastructure,utilities,buildings,or other parts of the built environment. 8. The tree location conflicts with areas of public street widening,construction,or extension as shown in the Transportation System Plan. 9. Tree removal is required for the purposes of an approved building or land use permit, utility or infrastructure installation,or utility or infrastructure repair. 10. The tree is recommended for removal by a designated Fire Marshal firc marshal for Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue because it presents a significant fire risk to habitable structures or limits emergency access for rescue workers, and the risk or access issue cannot be abated through pruning or other means that results in tree retention. 11. The tree is part of a stand of trees,and a certified arborist or certified forester determines that thinning of interior trees within the stand of trees is necessary for overall stand health, the thinning will result in no less than 80 percent canopy cover at maturity for the area to be thinned,and that thinning of non-native trees is maximized prior to thinning of native trees. C. Unless removed for thinning purposes (_Part 1.B.11 above) the City Manager city manager or designee will shall condition the removal of each tree upon the planting of a replacement tree in accordance with the Development Tree Replacement Standards in UFMSection 7, art 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. D. If the Development Tree Replacement Standards in UFMSection 7, Part 2 preclude replanting within the same property as the tree that was removed, the applicant will shall be exempt from planting a replacement tree. Page 11 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX Part 2.Development Tree Replacement Standards: A. Replacement trees must shall be planted in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. B. The replacement tree must shall be located so as to replace the function of the tree that was removed. For example, trees removed from parking lots must Shall be replaced in parking lots -- - :-- . -: . : :. - - : . . - , -. , : ;. - . If planting in the same location would not comply with the other standards in this section, the replacement tree mustshall be planted as close as practicable to the tree that was removed in compliance with the other standards in this section. C. The replacement species must sal be the same stature or greater (at maturity) as the tree that was removed. If planting the same stature or greater tree would not comply with the other standards in this section, the replacement tree must shall be the most similar stature practicable as the tree that was removed in compliance with the other standards in this section. D. If the tree that was removed was part of a stand of trees,then the following standards apply to the replacement tree: 1. The replacement tree must-shall be selected from the native tree list in UFMAppendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city manager or designee; 2. The minimum size of the replacement tree must:,hall be 2 feet in height(from the top of the root ball) or equivalent to a 1 gallon container size;and 3. The replacement tree must&t ll be located as follows: a. No closer than 10 feet on center from newly planted or existing trees; b. Trees categorized as small stature on the native tree list in UFMAppendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 15 feet from the face of habitable buildings; c. Trees categorized as medium stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 20 feet from the face of habitable buildings; d. Trees categorized as large stature on the native tree list in UFMAppendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 30 feet from the face of habitable buildings; e. Trees categorized as small stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not Ghall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 feet from any hard surface paving; f. Trees categorized as medium stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 or by the City Manager or designee may not the Urban Forestry Manual shall net be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2.5 244 feet from any hard surface paving; g. Trees categorized as large stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5the Lrban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not,hall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 3 feet from any hard surface paving;and h. Where there are overhead utility lines,the tree species selected must shall be of a type which,at full maturity,will not interfere with the lines. E. If the tree that was removed was an open grown tree, then the following standards apply to the replacement tree: Page 12 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX 1. The replacement tree must shall be selected from any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5thc Urban Forestry Manual(except the nuisance tree list) unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city managcr or designee; 2. The minimum size of the replacement tree must shall be LS 1 ' inch caliper of equivalent height at the time ofplanting for deciduous or 6 feet in height for evergreen; and 3. The replacement tree mustshall be located as follows: a. Trees categorized as small stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee mustshall be spaced no closer than 15 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 10 feet from the face of habitable buildings; b. Trees categorized as medium stature on any of the tree lists in UFMAppendices 2 through 5thc Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 20 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 15 feet from the face of habitable buildings; c. Trees categorized as large stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 30 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 20 feet from the face of habitable buildings; d. Trees determined by the CityManagercity manager or designee to have a mature spread of less than 20 feet will shall be considered small stature, and must shall be spaced no closer than 15 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 10 feet from the face of habitable buildings; e. Trees categorized as small stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 feet from any hard surface paving; f. Trees categorized as medium stature on any of the tree lists in UFMAppendices 2 through 5 or by the City Manager or designee may not the Urban Forestry Manual shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2.52442 feet from any hard surface paving; g. Trees categorized as large stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 3 feet from any hard surface paving;and h. Where there are overhead utility lines, the tree species selected mustshall be of a type which,at full maturity,will not interfere with the lines. ;;: • • - •- , ' ;-:•::-} : -: ation requirements in this Section and were not already required to be planted or preserved by the Tigard Municipal Codc. G. The City Manager city manager or designee may allow for a fee in lieu ofplanting an "in lieu of planting fee" equivalent to the city's cost to plant a tree per the standards in this Section and maintain a tree per the standards in TMCSsection 8.12.030 of the Tigard-Municipal Code for a period of three years after planting. Payment of a fee in lieu of planting will an "in lieu of planting fcc" shall satisfy the development tree replacement requirement. Page 13 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX Section 8 - Urban Forestry Fund Tree Removal and Replacement Standards Part 1.Urban Forestry Fund Tree Removal Standards: A. Trees subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 8.14 must sal be removed in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. B. The CityManagercity manager or designee will3hall approve the removal of trees subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 8.14 if any one of the following criteria are met: 1. The tree is a"hazard tree as defined in TMCChapter 8.02 and"hazard tree abatement" as defined in TMC Chapter 8.02 cannot be completed in a manner that results in tree retention consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. The tree risk assessment form found in UFM Appendix 1 must be completed by a tree risk assessor and submitted to the city. 2. The tree is dead. 3. The tree is in an advanced state of decline with insufficient live foliage, branches, roots, or other tissue to sustain life. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met. 4. The tree is infested with pests or diseases that if left untreated will cause the tree to die, enter an advanced state of decline, or cause other trees to die or enter an advanced state of decline. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met. 5. The tree has sustained physical damage that will cause the tree to die or enter an advanced state of decline. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met.If the physical damage was caused by a person in violation of TMC Chapter 8.14 of the Tigard Municipal Code, the city may take action pursuant to TMC Chapter 1.16 the enforcement proccsa outlined in Section 8.02.030 shall be completed prior to approval. 6. The tree is listed in the nuisance tree list in UFM Appendix 6 7. The tree roots are causing damage to paved surfaces,infrastructure,utilities,buildings,or other parts of the built environment. 8. The tree location conflicts with areas of public street widening,construction,or extension as shown in the Transportation System Plan. 9. Tree removal is required for the purposes of an approved building or land use permit, utility or infrastructure installation,or utility or infrastructure repair. 10. The tree is recommended for removal by a designated Fire Marshal fire marshal for Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue because it presents a significant fire risk to habitable structures or limits emergency access for rescue workers, and the risk or access issue cannot be abated through pruning or other means that results in tree retention. 11. The tree is part of a stand of trees,and a certified arborist or certified forester determines that thinning of interior trees within the stand of trees is necessary for overall stand health, the thinning will result in no less than 80 percent canopy cover at maturity for the area to be thinned,and that thinning of non-native trees is maximized prior to thinning of native trees. C. Unless removed for thinning purposes (Peart 1.B.11 above) the City Manager city manager or designee will shall condition the removal of each tree upon the planting of a replacement tree in Page 14 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX accordance with the Urban Forestry Fund Tree Replacement Standards in UFM Section 8,Peart 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. D. If the Urban Forestry Fund Tree Replacement Standards in UFM Section 8, Dart 2 preclude replanting within the same property as the tree that was removed, the applicant will'shall be exempt from planting a replacement tree. Part 2. Urban Forestry Fund Tree Replacement Standards: A. Replacement trees must shall be planted in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. B. The replacement species must shall be the same stature or greater (at maturity) as the tree that was removed. If planting the same stature or greater tree would not comply with the other standards in this section, the replacement tree must shall be the most similar stature practicable as the tree that was removed in compliance with the other standards in this section. C. If the tree that was removed was part of a stand of trees,then the following standards apply to the replacement tree: 1. The replacement tree must shall be selected from the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city fftftfrager or designee; 2. The minimum size of the replacement tree must shall be 2 feet in height(from the top of the root ball) or equivalent to a 1 gallon container size;and 3. The replacement tree must-shat be located as follows: a. No closer than 10 feet on center from newly planted or existing trees; b. Trees categorized as small stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must sal be spaced no closer than 15 feet from the face of habitable buildings; c. Trees categorized as medium stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 20 feet from the face of habitable buildings; d. Trees categorized as large stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5t-lie Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 30 feet from the face of habitable buildings; e. Trees categorized as small stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5t-he Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city mana cr or designee may notshall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 feet from any hard surface paving; f. Trees categorized as medium stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 or by the City Manager or designee may not the Urban Forestry Manual shall fret be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2.52 1/2 feet from any hard surface paving; g. Trees categorized as large stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5*he Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not3hall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 3 feet from any hard surface paving;and h. Where there are overhead utility lines, the tree species selected must shall be of a type which,at full maturity,will not interfere with the lines. Page 15 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX D. If the tree that was removed was an open grown tree, then the following standards apply to the replacement tree: 1. The replacement tree must sl'ral} be selected from any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5thc Urban Forestry Manual(except the nuisance tree list)unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city manager or designee; 2. The minimum size of the replacement tree must s ltll be L5 1 1/2 inch caliper or equivalent height at the time ofplanting for deciduous or 6 feet in height for evergreen; and 3. The replacement tree mustshall be located as follows: a. Trees categorized as small stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 15 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 10 feet from the face of habitable buildings; b. Trees categorized as medium stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 20 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 15 feet from the face of habitable buildings; c. Trees categorized as large stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must-shall be spaced no closer than 30 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 20 feet from the face of habitable buildings; d. Trees determined by the City Manager city manager or designee to have a mature spread of less than 20 feet will shall be considered small stature, and must shall be spaced no closer than 15 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 10 feet from the face of habitable buildings; e. Trees categorized as small stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 feet from any hard surface paving; f. Trees categorized as medium stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 or by the City Manager or designee may not the Urban Forestry be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 252' feet from any hard surface paving; g. Trees categorized as large stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 3 feet from any hard surface paving;and h. Where there are overhead utility lines, the tree species selected must shall be of a type which,at full maturity,will not interfere with the lines. applicable species, size,condition,and location requirements in this section and were not already required to be planted or preserved by the Tigard Municipal Codc. F. The City Manager city manager or designee may allow for a fee in lieu of planting an "in lieu of planting fee" equivalent to the city's cost to plant a tree per the standards in this section and maintain a tree per the standards in TMC Section 8.14.030 of the Tigard Municipal Code for a period of three years after planting. Payment of a fee in lieu of planting will an "in lieu of planting fee" shall satisfy the urban forestry fund tree replacement requirement. Page 16 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX Section 9 - Heritage Tree Designation Removal Standards Part 1. Heritage Tree Designation Removal Standards: A. Heritage trees subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 8.16 must shall be removed in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. B. The City Manager city manager or designee will shall approve the removal of heritage tree designation if any one of the following criteria are met for a designated heritage tree: 1. The heritage tree is a -`hazard tree as defined in TMC Chapter 8.02 and -``hazard tree abatement as defined in TMCChapter 8.02 cannot be completed in a manner that results in tree retention consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSIA300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. The tree risk assessment form found in UFM Appendix 1 must be completed by a tree risk assessor and submitted to the city. 2. The heritage tree is dead. 3. The heritage tree is in an advanced state of decline with insufficient live foliage,branches, roots or other tissue to sustain life. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met. 4. The heritage tree has sustained physical damage that will cause the tree to die or enter an advanced state of decline. The City Manager or designee may require additional documentation from a certified arborist to demonstrate that this criterion is met.If the physical damage was caused by a person in violation of TMC Chapter 8.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code, the city may take action pursuant to TMC Chapter 1.16 the enforcement proccaa outlined in Section 8.02.030 shall be completed prior to approval. 5. The tree is recommended for removal by a designated Fire Marshal fire marshal for Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue because it presents a significant fire risk to habitable structures or limits emergency access for rescue workers, and the risk or access issue cannot be abated through pruning or other means that results in tree retention. 6. The heritage tree is part of a stand of heritage trees, and a certified arborist or certified forester determines that thinning of interior heritage trees within the stand of heritage trees is necessary for overall stand health, the thinning will result in no less than 80 percent canopy cover at maturity for the area to be thinned, and that thinning of non-native heritage trees is maximized prior to thinning of native heritage trees. C. Replacement of heritage trees is not required unless a heritage tree is also subject to other provisions of the TMCTigard Municipal Code that require replacement. Section 10 - Urban Forestry Plan Standards Part 1. Urban Forestry Plan-Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan Requirements: A. The applicant must provide one plan ahall be standard size D (24" x 36") plan set, one a reduced ledger size (11" x 17")plan setiand one electronic copy in a PDF format, submitted on digital storage media. The plan setmustd include all items in Peart 1.B-O below.When required for clarity, the development impact area information in Part 1.I may be detailed separately on multiple plan sheets provided that all of the remaining items in/tart 1 are included for reference. "Development impact area"is defined in Chapter 18.30. Definitions of the Page 17 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX Community Development Code of the City of Tigard(TCDC).Alternate sheet sizes may be allowed if approved by the city manager or designee. B. Date of drawing or last revision. C. North arrow. D. Bar scale as follows (unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city manager or designee): 1. Less than 1.0 acres: 1" = 10' 2. 1.0 - 5.0 acres: 1" = 20' 3. 5.0—20.0 acres: 1" = 50' 4. Over 20.0 acres: 1" = 100'. E. Site address or assessor's parcel number. F. The location of existing and proposed property lines. G. Location of existing and proposed topographic lines at 1-foot contours unless otherwise approved. H. The location and type of sensitive lands areas. I. Proposed activities within the development impact area,including but not limited to: 1. Construction of structures and walls; 2. Paving and graveling; 3. Utility and irrigation installation; 4. Construction parking and construction equipment storage; 5. Landscaping; 6. Grading and filling; 7. Stockpiling; 8. Demolition and tree removal; 9. Trenching and boring;and 10. Any other activities that require excavation or soil disturbance. J. The trunk locations,driplines,assigned numbers.,and"X"marks when applicable(indicating trees proposed for removal) for the following trees within the development impact area and within 25 feet of the development impact area: 1. Trees greater than or equal to 6 inch diameter at breast height(DBH);ftftel 2. Trees less than 6 inch DBH that are identified on the native tree list in UPM Appendix 5:and 3. Other trees that require a permit to remove by Title 8 and are less than 6 inch DBH. K. The trunk locations, driplines, and assigned numbers for the following trees that are not within the development impact area: 1. Open grown trees greater than or equal to 6 inch DBH;and 2. Other trees that require a permit to remove by Title 8 and are less than 6 inch DBH. L. The driplines of stand grown trees greater than or equal to 6 inch DBH that form a contiguous tree canopy.The driplines may be delineated at the outer edge of the stand. Each stand must-shall be assigned a number. M. The location and type of proposed tree protection fencing. If the location of the tree protection fencing will be phased,indicate the location of the tree protection fencing for each corresponding phase. Tree protection fencing must shall be minimum 5-foot tall metal unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city manager or designee. N. Any supplemental tree preservation specifications consistent with tree care industry standards that the project arborist or landscape architect has determined are necessary for the continued viability of trees identified for preservation. Page 18 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX O. A signature of approval and statement from the project arborist or landscape architect, attesting that the tree preservation and removal site plan meets all of the requirements in UFMSection 10, /tart 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Part 2. Urban Forestry Plan—Tree Canopy Site Plan Requirements: A. The applicant must provide one plan shall be standard size D (24" x 36") plan set, a reduced ledger size (11" x 17")plan set,and one electronic copy in PDF format, submitted on digital storage media. The plan mustand include all items in Part 2.B-O belew.Alternate sheet sizes may be allowed if approved by the city manager or designee. B. Date of drawing or last revision. C. North arrow. D. Bar scale as follows (unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city manager or designee): 1. less than 1.0 acres: 1" = 10' 2. 1.0- 5.0 acres: 1" = 20' 3. 5.0—20.0 acres: 1" = 50' 4. Over 20.0 acres: 1" = 100'. E. Site address or assessor's parcel number. F. The location of proposed property lines. G. The location of proposed building footprints,utilities and irrigation,streets and other paved areas. H. The trunk locations, driplines and assigned numbers for trees to be preserved in Prarts 1.J and 1.K. Each tree on both the tree preservation and removal site plan and tree canopy site plan must sbl be assigned the same number on both plans. I. The dripline locations of stand grown trees proposed for preservation greater than or equal to 6 inch DBH that form a contiguous tree canopy. The dripline may be delineated at the outer edge of the stand. Each stand must shall be assigned a number. Each stand on both the tree preservation and removal site plan and tree canopy site plan must shall be assigned the same number on both plans. J. The location of existing or potential areas of tree growth limiting soils due to compaction, drainage, fertility,pH,contaminations or other factors. K. Methods for improving areas of tree growth limiting soils if tree planting is proposed in those locations. L. The location,species,caliper(in inches for broadleafdcciduous) or height(in feet for coniferous evergreen), assigned numbers, and depiction of the mature tree canopy (in feet as identified on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Managercity manager or designee) for all trees to be planted and maintained as open grown trees. The minimum size for all trees planted and maintained as open grown trees is 1.54 inch caliper or equivalent height at the time of planting for deciduous or 6 feet in height for evergreen. Open grown trees must shall be selected from any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Manual (except the nuiaance tree lint} unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city manager or designee. If an open grown tree approved for planting is not identified on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Miteuitl,then the project arborist or landscape architect mustshall determine the average mature tree canopy spread using available scientific literature for review and approval by the City Manager city manager or designee. The City Manager city manager or designee may consider trees less than 6 inch DBH as equivalent to newly planted trees if they meet all applicable species, size, conditions and location requirements in this section. Overall, the selection of open grown Page 19 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX trees must shall result in a reasonable amount of diversity for the site. Open grown trees must shall be located as follows: 1. Trees categorized as small stature on any of the tree lists in UFMAppendices 2 through thc Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee musts hall be spaced no closer than 15 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 10 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the City Manager city manager or designee_; 2. Trees categorized as medium stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee mustshall be spaced no closer than 20 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 15 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the City Manager city manager or designee; 3. Trees categorized as large stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through £the Urban Forestry Manual or by the CityManagercity manager or designee must-shall be spaced no closer than 30 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 20 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the City Manager city manager or designee_; 4. Trees determined by the City Manager city manager or designee to have a mature spread of less than 20 feet will shall be considered small stature, and must shall be spaced no closer than 15 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 10 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the City Manager city manager or designee; 5. Trees categorized as small stature on any of the tree lists in UFMAppendices 2 through 5the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 feet from any hard surface paving.; 6. Trees categorized as medium stature on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5thc Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee maynots4ta14-fiet be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 '/2 feet from any hard surface paving; 7. Trees categorized as large stature on any of the tree lists in UFMAppendices 2 through 5the Urban Fore3try Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 3 feet from any hard surface paving_; 8. Where there are overhead utility lines, the tree species selected must Shall be of a type which,at full maturity,will not interfere with the lines_;and 9. Where there is existing mature tree canopy or other areas with significant shade,the species selected must shall be an understory tree according to available scientific literature. However, understory trees must shall only be planted when the planting of non- understory trees is precluded due to site constraints. M. The location, species, size (in height or container size), assigned number, and depiction of the mature tree canopy dripline as identified in the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual (delineated at the outer edge of the stand) for all trees to be planted and maintained as stand grown trees.The species of trees planted and maintained as stand grown trees mustshill be selected from the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5thc Urban Forestry Manual. The depiction of the mature tree canopy dripline mustshall be consistent with dimensions in the native tree list. The minimum size of stand grown trees must shall be 2 feet in height (from the Page 20 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX top of the root ball) or equivalent to a 1 gallon container size. The City Manager city managcr or designee may consider trees less than 6 inch DBH as equivalent to newly planted trees if they meet all applicable species, size, conditions and location requirements in this section. Overall, the selection of stand grown trees must shall result in a reasonable amount of diversity for the site. Stand grown trees must shall be located as follows: 1. No closer than an average of 10 feet on center from newly planted or existing trees; 2. No further than an average of 20 feet on center from newly planted or existing trees; 3. Trees categorized as small stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 15 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the City Manager city manager or designee; 4. Trees categorized as medium stature on the native tree list in UFMAppendix5the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must be spaced no closer than 20 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the City Manager city manager or designee; 5. Trees categorized as large stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee must shall be spaced no closer than 30 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the City Manager city manager or designee; 6. Trees categorized as small stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 feet from any hard surface paving; 7. Trees categorized as medium stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5thc Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 1/2 feet from any hard surface paving; 8. Trees categorized as large stature on the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual or by the City Manager city manager or designee may not shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 3 feet from any hard surface paving; 9. Where there are overhead utility lines, the tree species selected must shall be of a type which,at full maturity,will not interfere with the lines;and 10. Where there is existing mature tree canopy or other areas with significant shade,the species selected must shall be an understory tree according to available scientific literature. However, understory trees must shall only be planted when the planting of non- understory trees is precluded due to space constraints. N. Any supplemental specifications that the project arborist or landscape architect has determined are necessary for the viability of trees proposed for planting. O. A signature of approval and statement from the project arborist or landscape architect, attesting that the tree canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in UFA,'Section 10, Piart 2 of--t-he Urban Forestry Manual. Part 3. Urban Forestry Plan—Supplemental Report Requirements: A. The supplemental report mustshall be provided by the project arborist or landscape architect in paper and PDF format,and include all items in Pfart 3.B-P below. B. Date of the report. Page 21 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX C. The name, address, telephone number, email address, and ISA certified arborist number of the project arborist or stamp and registration number of the project landscape architect. D. The following inventory data in table or other such organized format corresponding to each tree in harts 1.J and 1.K in the tree preservation and removal site plan: 1. The assigned tree number; 2. The genus,species and common name; 3. DBH (in inches); 4 Average tree canopy area (in square feet), calculated as follows: a. Avcragc tree canopy arca — (average tree canopy spread/2)2 x 7C; 5. Open grown tree or stand grown tree; 6. Heritage tree? (Y or N); 7. Numerical condition rating(0-3) as follows: Condition Overall vigor Tree Amount of History of Pests Extent of rating canopy deadwood failure decay density 0 Dead to severe <300/0 Large; major More than Infested Major; decline scaffold branches one scaffold conks and cavities 1 Declining 30-60% Twig and branch Scaffold Infested One to a dieback branches few conks; small cavities 2 Average 60-90% Small twigs Small Minor Present only branches at pruning wounds 3 Good to excellent 90-100% Little or none None Minor to Absent to Insignificant present only at pruning wounds 8. Numerical suitability for preservation rating(0-3) as follows: attng ." 0 The tree is a —`hazard tree as defined in TMC Chapter 8.02 Chapter 18.120 of the Tigard Dent-Code and—`hazard tree abatement-as defined in TMC Chapter 8.02Chaptcr 18.120 of the Tigard Development Code cannot be completed in a manner that results in tree retention consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. 1 The tree is dead,in severe decline or declining but may be retained if desirable for wildlife or other benefits because it is not considered a—`hazard tree'—'or E. The following inventory data in table or other such organized format corresponding to each existing stand in the tree preservation and removal site plan: 1. The assigned stand number; 2. The genus,species and common name of the tree species estimated to be dominant in the stand; 3. The genus,species and common name of the tree species estimated to be the second and third most common in the stand; 4. The estimated average DBH (in inches) of the dominant tree species in the stand; 5. The estimated average DBH (in inches) of both the second and third most common tree species in the stand; 6. The estimated average condition rating (per /tart 3D.7) of the dominant tree species in the stand; 7. The estimated average condition rating (per Irart 3.D.7) of both the second and third most common tree species in the stand; 8. The total on site tree canopy area (in square feet) of the stand; 9. Numerical suitability for preservation rating of the stand (0-3) as follows: Rating ,Cons.i.derations _ �.. x 0 Nuisance trees are the dominant species in the stand tifi.€17Lor continued viability of the stand is unlikely due to pests,diseases,competition from nuisance tree or plant species,hydrologic changes or other factors. 1 The stand requires a currently cost prohibitive level of investment and management of pests, diseases, nuisance tree or plant species,hydrology or other factors to become viable. 2 The stand is viable but requires more frequent management and monitoring of pests,diseases,nuisance tree or plant species,hydrology or other factors for continued viability than a stand rated as a"3". 3 The stand is viable and requires less frequent management and monitoring of pests,diseases,nuisance tree or plant species,hydrology or other factors for continued viability than a stand rated as a"2". 10. The total on site tree canopy area (in square feet) of the stand proposed for preservation; and 11. Additional comments. F. Supplemental specifications regarding the location and type of proposed tree protection fencing. If the location of the tree protection fencing will be phased, indicate the location of the tree protection fencing for each corresponding phase.Tree protection fencing mustsall be minimum 5-foot tall metal unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city manager or designee. G. Supplemental specifications consistent with tree care industry standards that the project arborist or landscape architect has determined are necessary for the continued viability of trees identified for preservation. H. Supplemental specifications consistent with tree care industry standards that the project arborist or landscape architect has determined are necessary for the continued viability of stands identified for preservation. I. A general accounting of soil characteristics on site. Areas of existing or potential tree growth limiting soils due to compaction,drainage,fertility,pH,contamination,or other factors musts raMl be clearly identified. Methods for improving areas of tree growth limiting soils if tree planting is proposed in those areas mustchall be specifically addressed. J. The following inventory data in table or other such organized format corresponding to each open grown tree proposed for planting in the tree canopy site plan: 1. The assigned tree number; 2. The genus, species and common name; Page 23 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX 3. The caliper (in inches for broadleaf deeiduou3) or height (in feet for coniferous evergreen); 4. The average mature tree canopy spread (in feet) as identified on any of the tree lists in the UFM Appendices 2 through 5 thc Urban Forestry Manual. If an open grown tree approved for planting is not identified on any of the tree lists in the UFM Appendices 2 through 5 thc Urban Forestry Manual, then the project arborist or landscape architect must shall determine the average mature tree canopy spread using available scientific literature for review and approval by the City Manager city manager or designee; 5. The average mature tree canopy area (in square feet) calculated as follows: a. ' • --. . - . - -:: — (average mature tree canopy spread/2)2x t; 6. The proposed available soil volume (in cubic feet) for each tree according to the methodology in UFMSection 12, /tart 2 of thc Urban Forestry Manual. If the available soil volume is greater than 1000 cubic feet,then the it is OK to note soil volume may be labeled as simply"over 1000 cubic feet";and 7. Additional comments. K. The following inventory data in table or other such organized format corresponding to each stand proposed for planting in the tree canopy site plan: 1. The assigned stand number; 2. The genus, species and common name of trees proposed for planting in the stand; 3. The average spacing(in feet) and total number of each tree species proposed for planting in the stand; 4. The height (in feet) or container size (in gallons) of each species proposed for planting in the stand; 5. The mature tree canopy dripline area of the stand (in square feet) delineated at the outer edge of the stand;and 6. Additional comments L. Any supplemental specifications consistent with tree care industry standards that the project arborist or landscape architect has determined are necessary for the viability of trees proposed for planting. M. A summary in table or other such organized format clearly demonstrating the effective tree canopy cover that will be provided for the overall development site (excluding streets)}and for each lot or tract for subdivisions and land partitions in the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 zones district3 (excluding streets) as outlined below. follow3: "Development site" is defined in TCDC Chapter 18.30.Definitions. 1. The area (in square feet) of the overall development site and each lot or tract; and 2. The effective tree canopy area that will be provided for the overall development site and each lot or tract which willchall be considered the sum of the following: a. Double the canopy area (in square feet) of all open grown trees in the tree canopy site plan proposed for preservation within the overall development site and each lot or tract (or associated right of way, excluding median trees). Trees identified on the nuisance tree list in UFM Appendix 6.or trees with a condition rating or suitability for preservation rating of less than 2 are not eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy.Only trcc3 with both a condition rating and Suitability for preservation rating of 2 or greater arc eligible for crcdit towards thc effective tree canopy cover. The overall development site and each lot or tract(or associated right of way)with the largest percentage of the trunk immediately above the trunk flare or root buttresses will shall be assigned the effective tree canopy cover area for the corresponding tree; Page 24 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XX'X b. Double the canopy area (in square feet) of all stands in the tree canopy site plan proposed for preservation within the overall development site and each lot or tract (or associated right of way, excluding median trees). Trees identified on the nuisance tree list in UFM Appendix 6, or trees with a condition rating or suitability for preservation rating of less than 2 are not eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy.Only stands with both a condition rating and suitability for preservation rating of 2 or grcatcr arc eligible for credit towards the effective trcc canopy cover.The eligible tree canopy area will ahall be the portion directly above the overall development site and each lot or tract(or associated right of way). The canopy area of any stand grown tree with the largest percentage of the trunk immediately above the trunk flare or root buttresses outside of the overall development site and each lot or tract(or associated right of way) may not shall-net be eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover requirement for that development site or lot or tract; c. 1.5 times the canopy area (in square feet) of all trees less than 6 inch DBH in the tree canopy site plan proposed for preservation within the overall development site and each lot(or associated right ofway, excluding median trees) that are identified on the native tree list in UFMAppendix 5. d. The mature canopy area(in square feet) of all open grown trees in the tree canopy site plan,except for those from the native tree list in UFMAppendix5thc Urban Forestry Manual,to be planted and maintained within the overall development site and each lot or tract (or associated right of way,excluding median trees); e. 1.25 times the mature canopy area (in square feet) of all open grown trees from the native tree list in UFM Appendix 5 the Urban Forestry Manual in the tree canopy site plan to be planted and maintained within the overall development site and each lot or tract (or associated right of way,excluding median trees); f. 1.25 times the mature canopy area (in square feet) of each stand in the tree canopy site plan to be planted and maintained within the overall development site and each lot or tract (or associated right of way, excluding median trees). The eligible mature tree canopy area will shall be the portion directly above the overall development site and each lot or tract (or associated right of way);and g. Divide the tree canopy area (calculated per/tart 3.M.2.a-k above) for the overall development site and each lot or tract by the total area of the overall development site and each lot Win-tcT respectively to determine the effective tree canopy cover for the overall development site and each lot or tract. N. The minimum requirements for effective tree canopy cover are outlined below: The least: 1. Subdivisions and land partitions: a. 40 percent for the overall development site in the R-1. R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zones, and 15 percent for each lot designated for single detached house development. b. 33 percent for the overall development site in the R-12. R-25, and R-40 zones. 2. Apartments:33 percent for the overall development site. 3. Nonresidential development: 33 percent for the overall development site, except nonresidential development in the MU-CBD. MUC-1, 1-4 and I-H zones and Page 25 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX schools (as defined in TCDC Section 18.60.050.J) are only required to provide 25 percent for the overall development site. 4. Mobile home parks:33 percent for the overall development site. 5. Wireless communication facilities:zero percent for the overall development site. 7. 33 percent for R 12, R 25, R 4Q C N, C C, C C, C P, MUE, MUS -1 'OSE 2, MUC, MUR and I P districts,except for schools (18.130.050(J));and 8. 25 percent for MU CBD,MUC 1,I L aid I H districts aril for schools (1-8.1-304454€1))-ift all districts. 0. -- -- - - - : --- . -:: : - -- - - . ::: . : - - . ., -- • --- - above for the overall development or kas than 15 percent for any lot or tract in the R 1, R 2, R 3.5, R 4.5 and R 7 districts (when the overall development site meets or exceeds the standard percent effective tree canopy cover in item n), calculate the tree canopy fcc required to meet the applicable standard percent effective tree canopy cover - - . _: : -- = •- . 1.5 and R 7 districts do provide 15 percent effective tree canopy cover) according to the methodology in Section 1-0,part 4 of the Urban Forestry Maeual. P. A signature of approval and statement from the project arborist or landscape architect, attesting that: 1. The tree preservation and removal site plan meets all of the requirements in UFMSection 10, Part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual; 2. The canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in UFM Section 10, Part 2 of—the Urban Forestry Manual;and 3. The supplemental report meets all of the requirements UFM Section 10,Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Part 4.Urban Forestry Plan—Tree Canopy Fee Calculation Requirements: A. The tree canopy fee will shall be calculated as follows: 4- If the percentage of effective tree canopy cover is less than the applicable standard percentage in Part 3,item N11 above for the overall development sites find the difference (in square feet) between the proposed effective tree canopy cover and the applicable standard effective tree canopy cover for the overall development site and multiply the difference (in square feet) by- a. I he most recent wholesale median tree cost established by the PNW-ISA for a 3 inch diameter deciduous tree in the Willamette Valley, OR divided by 59 square feet. 2. In cases where the overall development site meets the standard percentage in Filart 3.N above yet the percentage of effective tree canopy cover is less than 15 percent for any individual lot or tract in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zones districts, find the difference (in square feet) between the proposed effective tree canopy cover and 15 percent effective tree canopy cover for each deficient lot or tract and multiply the difference (in square feet) by= a. tThe most recent wholesale median tree cost established by the PNW-ISA for a 3 inch diameter deciduous tree in the Willamette Valley, OR divided by 59 square feet. Page 26 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX Part 5. Urban Forestry Plan—Significant Tree Grove Preservation Considerations: A. Connects with and does not become isolated from the remaining portion of the significant tree grove on or off the site; B. Preserves the most dominant,resilient,and healthiest native trees; C. Preserves a diversity of species,ages,and sizes of native trees; D. Preserves native understory and supports natural succession; E. Preserves and minimizes disturbance to native soils and tree roots; F. Does not preserve hazard trees or trees likely to soon become hazard trees particularly those subject to windthrow (low live crown ratio, high height to diameter ratio, suppressed root development) and exacerbated by newly created edges and/or removal of adjacent trees;and G. Does not preserve trees currently or likely to soon be severely impacted by large scale weed,pest, or disease outbreaks ator changing site conditions such as{hydrology,light, temperature, or wind}. Section 11- Urban Forestry Plan Implementation Standards Part 1. Urban Forestry Plan Implementation Standards—Inspection Requirements: A. After tree protection measures are installed and prior to any ground disturbance other than what is necessary for the installation of tree protection measures and erosion, sediment, and pollutant controls measures,the project arborist or landscape architect mustchall perform a site inspection for tree protection measures, document compliance or74ion-compliance with the urban forestry plan,and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the City Managercity manager or designee within one week of the site inspection. B. Following the completion of item Aa abeve,the project arborist or landscape architect mustshall perform semimonthly(twice monthly)site inspections for tree protection measures during periods of active site development and construction,document compliance or fnon-compliance with the urban forestry plan,and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the City Managercity manager or designee within one week of the site inspection. The city may approve adjustments to the frequency of inspections based on the project arborist's recommendation. The project arborist must also be available on-call to monitor and document construction activity near protected trees when necessary. The frequency of site inspections may be decreased if approved by the city manager or designee. C. When the development land use review type will result in the division of land into multiple lots or tracts, the applicant must shall provide on the building site plan for each resulting lot or tract, the information detailed in UFM Section 10, Peart 2.B-N of the Urban Forestry Manual consistent with the approved urban forestry plan. Prior to issuance of any building permits for each resulting lot or tract, the project arborist or landscape architect must shall perform a site inspection for tree protection measures, document compliance or/-non-compliance with the urban forestry plan,and send written verification with a signature of approval with the building permit submittal documents. D. When the development land we review type will result in the division of land into multiple lots or tracts, the project arborist or landscape architect mustshall perform a site inspection for tree protection measures for all lots or tracts that are not proposed to be associated with a building permit,document compliance or fnon-compliance with the urban forestry plan,and send written verification with a signature of approval to the City Manager city manager or designee prior to the issuance of the first building permit resulting from the development land use review type. Page 27 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX E. Prior to final building inspection for any development any lot or tract with an urban forestry plan that is still in effect, the project arborist or landscape architect must shall perform a site inspection, document compliance or 7Lnon-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval to the City Manager city manager or designee. Part 2. Urban Forestry Plan Implementation Standards—Tree Establishment Requirements: A. Prior to any ground disturbance work for all development types except for subdivisions and land partitions, the applicant must shall provide a tree establishment bond for all on-site trees to be planted per the approved urban forestry plan. The total bond amount must be equivalent to the city's average cost to plant and maintain a tree per the applicable standards in the UFA for a period of one year after planting multiplied by the total number of on-site trees to be planted and maintained.= 1. For subdivisions and minor land partitions shall be equivalent to the city's average cost to period of two years after planting multiplied by the total number of trees to be planted and maintained;and 2. For all other land use review types shall be equivalent to the city's average coat to plant and maintain a tree per the applicable standards in the Urban Forestry Manual for a period planting multiplied by the total number of trees to be planted and maintained. B. Following final building inspection or upon acceptance by the City Manager city manager or designee when there is no final building inspection, the tree establishment period begins immediately shall immediately begin and continues for a period of one year. 1. In subdivisions and partitions, for a perio. : -• : • - : .- :. . - ..--- . • - sold;and 2. In all other land use review types, for a period of one year. C. When the land use review type will result in the division of land into multiple lots or tracts, there shall be a separate tree establishment period for each resulting lot or tract whcrc trees arc shown to be planted in the approved urban forestry plan. D. Following the applicable tree establishment period for each lot or tract, the bond shall be correspondingly reduced based on tree survival following a site inspection, documentation of successful tree establishment and/or replacement according to items E and F below, and receipt by the city manager or designee of written verification of findings and a signature of approval by the project arborist or landscape architect. E. For planted open grown trees, successful establishment will shall be considered 80 percent survival of the open grown trees planted on the overall development site lot or tract, and replacement of 100 percent of the remaining open grown trees planted on the overall development site lot or tract that did not survive. F. For planted stand grown trees,successful establishment willshall be considered survival of at least 80 percent of the original stand grown trees planted on the overall development site lot or tract. for open grown trees described in part 2.B F above shall be repeated until the successful cstabliahment requirement for open grown trees is met. II. If successful establishment for stand grown trees is less than 80 percent for any lot or tract, the Page 28 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX for stand grown trees described in Part 2.B F above shall be repeated until the successful establishment requirement for stand grown trees is met. Part 3. Urban Forestry Plan Implementation Standards — Urban Forest Inventory Requirements: A. Following documentation of compliance with the urban forestry plan by the project arborist or landscape architect for the overall development site,the city wilishall collect spatial and species specific data for each open grown tree and area of stand grown trees for inclusion in a publicly accessible inventory of trees. B. Prior to any ground disturbance work, the applicant must shall provide a fee to cover the city's cost of collecting and processing the inventory data for the entire urban forestry plan. Section 12 - Street Tree Soil Volume Standards Part 1. Street Tree Soil Volume Standards—Soil Volume Requirements: A. Street trees required to be planted by TCDC Cehapter 18.420745 must.shitil be provided the following minimum soil volumes based on the width of the proposed right of way measured from the edge of the street (excluding curb) towards the subject site: Minimum Soil Right of Way Width Volume Requirement (feet) (cubic feet per tree) Up to 10 400 Over 10 up to 12 500 Over 12 up to 14 600 Over 14 up to 16 700 Over 16 up to 18 800 Over 18 up to 20 900 Over 20 1000 Part 2. Street Tree Soil Volume Standards—Soil Volume Calculation Requirements: A. For open soil volumes, soil depth is assumed to be 3 feet if the tree canopy site plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and supplemental report (per 18.790.030.A.1) demonstrate that the tree will not be planted in an area of tree growth limiting soil or the area of tree growth limiting soil will be adequately amended to a depth of 3 feet in the specified planting area. B. Areas of tree growth limiting soils that have not been adequately amended may not shall not be eligible for credit towards the minimum soil volume requirements in 1ttart 1 of this section. C. For covered soil volumes, the soil depth is equal to the depth of the covered soil volume as demonstrated by the soil volume plan in tart 3 of this section. Page 29 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX D. Soil volumes for open soil volumes mustchall be calculated (in cubic feet) by measuring the open soil volume area (in square feet) times an assumed soil depth of 3 feet. E. Soil volumes for covered soils volumes must ohall be calculated (in cubic feet) by multiplying the area of the covered soil volume times the depth of the covered soil volume as demonstrated by the soil volume plan in /tart 3 of this section. F. The total soil volume provided for a tree must ahall be calculated (in cubic feet) by adding the available open soil volume (per Ptart 2.0 move) to the available covered soil volume (per Ppart 2.D move) within a 50 foot radius of the tree. G. The open and covered soil volumes are considered"available'—'to a tree only when they are directly connected to the tree by a continuous path of no less than 3 feet in width. H. In addition,covered soil volumes are considered available to a tree only when demonstrated as available by the soil volume plan in Ppart 3 of this section. I. All soil volumes calculated per this section must Shall be displayed for each corresponding tree in the required supplemental report. Part 3. Street Tree Soil Volume Standards—Soil Volume Plan Requirements: A. A soil volume plan will shall be required for any street tree required to be planted by TCDC Cehapter 18.420715 if a covered soil volume is proposed to be used to meet any portion of the minimum soil volume requirements in Ptart 1 of this section. The soil volume plan must shall include all items in /tart 3.B-E below. B. One A standard size D (24" x 36 plan set, one a reduced ledger size (11" x 17") plan set, and one electronic copy in*PDF format, submitted on digital storage media. The soil volume plan must be coordinated and approved by a registered landscape architect (the project landscape architect), and must includes all of the following elements (alternate sheet sizes may be allowed if approved by the city manager or designee): 1. Date of drawing or last revision; 2. North arrow; 3. Bar scale; 4. Site address or assessor's parcel number; 5. The name, address, telephone number, email address,and license number of the project landscape architect; 6. The location of property lines or proposed property lines if different from existing; 7. The location of proposed building footprints, utilities and irrigation, streets, and other paved or impermeable areas; 8. The assigned numbers (consistent with the tree canopy site plan and supplemental report of a concurrent urban forestry plan) of all trees; 9. The location of each open soil volume area and each covered soil volume area considered "available''—' for each tree;and 10. The City of Tigard Example Covered Soil Volume Plan Drawings and Specifications unless otherwise approved by the City Managercity manager or designee. If required for C. When the development land use review type will result in the division of land into multiple lots or tracts, the applicant must Ghall provide on the building site plan for each resulting lot or tract, the information detailed in Ptart 3.B.1-10 of this section consistent with the approved soil volume plan and a signature of approval from the project landscape architect. D. The project landscape architect must shall document compliance or -non-compliance (including but not limited to materials receipts and observations from site inspections) with the approved Page 30 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX soil volume plan,and send written verification with a signature of approval to the City Manager city manager or designee prior to final building inspection for all lots,parcels,or tracta associated with each particular tree. When the development land use review type will result in the division of land into multiple lots or tracts, the project landscape architect must shall provide the documentation or7Lverification described above for all lots or tracts that are not proposed to be associated with a building permit prior to the issuance of the first building permit resulting from the development land use review type. When the development land use review type does not involve a building permit, the project landscape architect must shall provide the documentation or verification described above prior to final acceptance by the City Manager city manager or designee. E. If any subsequent modifications to an approved soil volume plan is required to meet the minimum soil volume requirements in Peart 1 of this section, a revised soil volume plan that meets the requirements of Part 3 of this section must shall be provided that reflect the revisions. Section 13 - Parking Lot Tree Canopy Standards Part 1. Parking Lot Tree Canopy Standards—Parking Lot Tree Requirements: A. Parking lot trees mustshall be planted in a manner consistent with the tree care industry standards outlined in the most current version of the ANSIA300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. B. Parking lot trees must shall have a minimum caliper of 1.51 1/2 inches or equivalent height{fer deciduous) or height of a 6 feet (for evergreen) at the time of planting. C. Parking lot tree species mustshall be from the parking lot tree list,unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city manager or designee. D. Parking lot trees may not ahall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 3 feet from any hard surface paving,including curbs. E. Parking lot trees must shall be evenly distributed within the parking area, and no greater than 6 feet from the parking area. F. Parking lot trees must shall be provided a minimum of 1000 cubic feet of soil volume per tree. Part 2. Parking Lot Tree Canopy Standards—Soil Volume Calculation Requirements: A. Soil volumes for open soil volumes must:,hall be calculated (in cubic feet) by measuring the open soil volume area (in square feet) times an assumed soil depth of 3 feet. B. Soil volumes for covered soils volumes mustshall be calculated (in cubic feet) by multiplying the area of the covered soil volume times the depth of the covered soil volume as demonstrated by the parking lot tree canopy plan in Part 3 of this section. C. The total soil volume provided for a tree must shall be calculated (in cubic feet) by adding the available open soil volume (per Part 2.A above) to the available covered soil volume (per /tart 2.B above) within a 50 foot radius of the tree. D. The open and covered soil volumes are considered"available'—'to a tree only when they are directly connected to the tree by a continuous path of no less than 3 feet in width, and demonstrated as available by the parking lot tree canopy plan in Peart 3 of this section. E. All soil volumes calculated per this section must thall be displayed for each corresponding tree in the supplemental report(per 18.790.030.A.1)when an urban forestry plan is concurrently required. Part 3. Parking Lot Tree Canopy Standards—Parking Lot Tree Canopy Plan Requirements: A. A parking lot tree canopy plan will shall be required unless the City Manager city manager or designee determines the requirements of a concurrent urban forestry plan per TCDC Cehapter Page 31 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-M 18.420745 will meet the equivalent standards in Part 3 of this section.The parking lot tree canopy plan musts-ball include all items in Part 3.B-E below. B. One standard size D (24" x 36 plan set, one a reduced ledger size (11" x 17") plan set, and one electronic copy in a PDF format, submitted on digital storage media. The parking lot tree canopy plan must be coordinated and approved by a registered landscape architect (the project landscape architect). and must that includes all of the following elements{alternate sheet 1. Date of drawing or last revision; 2. North arrow; 3. Bar scale; 4. Site address or assessor's parcel number; 5. The name, address, telephone number, email address,and license number of the project landscape architect; 6. The location of property lines or proposed property lines if different from existing; 7. The location of proposed building footprints, utilities and irrigation, streets, and other paved or impermeable areas; 8. The location of areas of tree growth limiting soils due to compaction, drainage, fertility, pH,contamination,or other factors; 9. Methods for improving areas of tree growth limiting soils if tree planting is proposed in those areas. heet; 10. The location of all parking lot striping and the location of the limits of the parking area, which includes all parking spaces,all landscape islands,and all parking aisles; 11. Assigned numbers (consistent with the tree canopy site plan per 18.790.030.A.3 and supplemental report per 18.790.030.A.1 of a concurrent urban forestry plan) of all parking lot trees; 12. The location, species, and caliper (in inches for broadleafdcciduous) or height (in feet for coniferous Been) of all parking lot trees; 13. Depiction of the average mature tree canopy spread(in feet as identified on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forestry Manual) for each parking lot tree. If a parking lot tree is not identified on any of the tree lists in UFM Appendices 2 through 5 the Urban Forc,try Manual, then the project arborist or landscape architect must determine the average mature tree canopy spread using available scientific literature for review and approval by the City Manager city manager or designee; 14. The location of each open soil volume area and each covered soil volume area considered "available'—' for each tree;and 15. If covered soil volumes are proposed to meet any portion of the soil volume requirement in /tart 1.F of this section, the City of Tigard Example Covered Soil Volume Plan Drawings and Specifications unless otherwise approved by the City Manager city ffiftiftftger or designee. If required for clarity,this information may be detailed on a separate plan ahcct. C. A summary in table or other such organized format clearly demonstrating the proposed percent tree canopy cover at maturity directly over the parking area as follows: 1. The area (in square feet) of the parking area as shown in the parking lot tree canopy plan; 2 The average mature tree canopy area for each parking lot tree as follows: a. ' • --. -.. • -- -:: . — (average mature tree canopy spread/2)2 x x; 3. The total combined mature tree canopy area(in square feet) of all parking lot trees less the percentage not directly over the parking area;and Page 32 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX 4. The total combined mature tree canopy area directly over the parking area (in square feet) divided by the parking area. D. The project landscape architect must shall document compliance or fnon-compliance (including but not limited to materials receipts and observations from site inspections) with the approved parking lot tree canopy plan,and send written verification with a signature of approval to the City Manager city manager or designee prior to final building inspection or prior to final acceptance when there is no final building inspection. E. If any subsequent modifications to an approved parking lot tree canopy plan is required,a revised parking lot tree canopy plan that meets the requirements of/tart 3 of this section must-shall be provided that reflect the revisions. Approved by: Martha L.Wine,City Manager Date Page 33 Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Effective Date:XX-XX-XXX CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done rIUARE) Proposed Amendments to Urban Forestry Manual Presented to Tigard City Council March 19, 2019 ( I I 1 Y OF TIGARD Background on Urban Forestry Manual: Urban Forestry Manual (UFM) was originally approved in 2013 Administrative Rules Implement details of urban forestry related code provisions in the Municipal Code and Community Development Code Examples: • Tree removal permits • Minimum canopy requirements for new developments C I "1' V. OF l' 1 G .A R D Example Amendments: Consistency with newly-updated Community Development Code: Updating terminology (i.e. changing "shall" to "must") Updating outdated numerical Code references Minimum canopy requirements: organized by development types, instead of by zones L: I 1 O I' 'T I G A R D Example Amendments: Adding a canopy credit bonus for developers who preserve existing, young native trees Clarifying tree bonding requirements: Remove separate bond requirement for street trees Instead, incorporate street trees into bond for street improvements ► Help eliminate redundancy T I C \ R I) Administrative Rulemaking Procedure: City Council has two (2) options for next steps, as outlined in TMC Section 2.04.070: Move the proposed amendments forward for public notice and review • City Manager may either approve, modify, or reject the proposed amendments Add the proposed amendments to discussion agenda for next available City Council meeting • City Council consideration or action CI 1' O l' TIG A RD Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the proposed amendments to the Urban Forestry Manual be moved forward for public notice and review AIS-3776 4. Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 03/19/2019 Length (in minutes):30 Minutes Agenda Title: Receive Quarterly Capital Improvement Plan Update Prepared For: Lori Faha,Public Works Submitted By: Lori Faha,Public Works Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Briefing and update on the status of Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects underway. STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST No action is requested;the purpose of this item is to brief council. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) establishes Tigard's budget and timeline for improvements to city owned and operated public infrastructure over a 6-year period. A CIP project improves or adds value to the city's infrastructure,typically costs $50,000 or more,and has a useful life or extends the useful life of infrastructure for 5 years or more. Public facility systems addressed by the CIP include streets,parks,sanitary sewers, stormwater and domestic water in addition to public buildings and facilities. In most cases,CIP projects are implemented with oversight from the city's Engineering Division. City Engineer Lori Faha will provide a summary report to council,including the status of active projects during this briefing. The attached file will be shown as a PowerPoint presentation at the meeting. Copies of individual project status reports for active CIP projects will be delivered to council in the March 14,2019 City Council Newsletter packet. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Not applicable. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS The Fiscal Year 2018-19 CIP,which is the focus of this presentation,was adopted on June 26,2018. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION The last council CIP briefing was on November 20,2018. Attachments March 2019 CIP Update AgendaQuick©2005-2019 Destiny Software Inc.,All Rights Reserved ia CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done TIGARD CapitalImprovement Project Update FY 2018-19 Tigard City Council Meeting I March 19, 2019 C I T Y O F Project Status • On Target 0 Minor Issues • Major Issues ► Parks 11 ► Streets Watery • • • Sanitary Sewer Stormwaters r Facilities T Y F T I G A R D Status of Parks Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Fanno Creek Remeander Substantially complete Dirksen Nature Park Camas Festival —April 27 • Oak Savannah Restoration Cattle coming in May! • Nature Play Area Nearing completion, budget increased in 01 • for high construction costs • Interpretive Shelter and Complete, budget increased in 01 for high Restroom construction costs Tigard Street Heritage Trail Working on permitting with rail agencies CITY OF TIGARD Status of Parks Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Fanno Creek Trail— RFFA Grant Design underway, scope adjustments keeping • project on budget Construction complete, graffiti artist Fanno Creek Trail/Tiedeman contracted for wall, budget increased in 01 • for high construction costs Resurfacing courts, replacing park signs, Parks Major Maintenance Potso paving, Jack Park trail evaluation, Cook • Park creek erosion evaluation, irrigation system upgrades Parks Master Plan Hiring consultant, added budget in 01 to conduct early action conditions assessment Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Received Metro grant, consultant selected, 40 Study Bonita—Tualatin River delay start due to city PM on leave C I `Iy Y OF TIGARD Status of Streets Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Pavement Management Hiring PMP project manager in PW, slurry Program seal contract ready for bid, Durham Rd overlay design underway Multiple projects—sidewalk/path gap filling, Pedestrian and Cyclist crosswalk improvements, bike/ped • Connections Program counts,"Your Speed Is" signs, pilot safety projects, grant matching funds Upper Boones Ferry/ Durham New signal controllers & coordinated timing • Adaptive Signals implemented, adaptive software and High School crosswalk change next, ODOT delays Commercial Street Sidewalk TriMet lead, design nearly complete, reduced (Main to Lincoln) scope due to high costs Hunziker Industrial Core/Wall St Construction substantially complete Wall St/Tech Center Drive IGA approved for RFFA grant, start design in • Connection spring 2019 C 1 'I" V 0 1' T I G :-A R 1) Status of Streets Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Roy Rogers Road County lead, construction started • • North Dakota Street Bridge Selected for ODOT grant, scoping for IGA and Replacement design RFP, expect additional budget need 72nd Avenue/Tigard Triangle Open House April 9 for input on cross-section • Study options 121st Ave (Whistlers Lane— County lead through MSTIP program, design • Tippitt) sidewalks, bike lanes kick-off scheduled Tiedeman Ave Complete Street Scoping, focus initially on sidewalk only '; • improvements at Tigard St Trail Main Street Phase 2 Preparing Request for Proposals for design Traffic Safety Action Plan New project, funded by ODOT, will review crash trends for ways to reduce • • CITY O F T I CG A l: I) Status of Water Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Red Rock Creek Waterline Work is being phased to coordinate with Relocation other projects, design and construction underway Canterbury Pump Station Consultant analysis complete, PW Operations tasks identified as short-term fix Underway, system model developed, Water Master Plan coordinating with Lake Oswego, identifying future needs and options Fonner St/121st Ave Valve & Will be included with Wash Co's contracts for Piping Improvements 121st Ave project Water Rate & SDC Study Not started, will follow master plan 40 C I T Y OF TIG ARD Status of Sanitary Sewer Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Design & permitting underway for stream • East Fork Derry Dell Creek restoration & sanitary sewer protection Fanno Creek Sanitary Siphon Final design complete, construction delayed Repair to spring/summer 2019 or later due to permitting and easement acquisition Sanitary Sewer Major Repairing/lining sewer in Scoffins • Maintenance CITY OF "I" I G ARD Status of Stormwater Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Fanno Creek Slope Stabilization Design complete, permitting underway, —Arthur Court scope increase for more bank erosion to address, construct summer 2019 124th Avenue/Ann Court Culvert Final design complete, permitting delay, Replacement construct summer 2019 Stormwater Rate/Funding Study Not started yet—awaiting consultant contract approval Kruger Creek Predesign Consultant predesign underway Bridgeport Stormline Replace Contractor selected, packaged with 2 other pipe lining major maint projects Frewing Stormline Replace Design initiated Water Quality Facility Rehab Condition assessments for facilities Program underway, developing priorities • Stormwater Major Maintenance Multiple pipe and stream system repairs ' ' I 'I ' \I' ( 1 : '1' T ( \ R D Status of Other Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Americans with Disabilities Act Initial plan draft prepared, holding staff Transition Plan review meetings • • Public Works Facility and Yard Initiating scoping for new facility site(s) and • • (planning) determining how to fund C I T Y O F TIGARD Tentative ' . irt , 1 — t_- --_ Pavement Treatments �'' -- s 3013-2023 p 1 � Pc r 2019 Slurry Seal , 111 + •rr � �� /• 'fi ai .0i. I 1114'2O1a PreliminaryReoontmendatiens - t '� 1:0 5 localized repair areas , 6 to 10 localized repair areas , r >13 localized repair areas ,•:- \ (V Large Areas of Patching Regured: / 7 -�\ //[L;^-�.w.{ '06th Or(North Dakota St to Black Diamorc','ay i Xf,,,_ V.M.NO 1 It CCiS 90th Ave(Lomita Ave to North Dakota St) '. I t '- 1 93rd Ave(Wien Dr to Juta PI) LAU1an 95th Ave(Greenbury Rd to 95th Ave) s - I, Ascension Dr(Mistletoe Or to Fern St) r F r -...'15-' Johnson St(Grant Ave to Brookside Ave: Lewis Ln(95th Ave to End) ` ,l:� o Meadow St(Tiedeman Ave to End) ""� .e a A. R Ci1CME iY 11 = I C — -7/ r ttAARDE D ,. ' _- _._- �, BONrrA \*.-.. t. I • 11 1,,, { /t : . VGARp)1PS ., i a n,.,; M OW BEND -- ,�,� K M �pDURHA4"if, ,. P- � -1Ax r .+Y FA DOW,�r� * � i , a • .'°t"�J aQ4t'' C I `I' V O F TIG ;1 R D Fanno Creek Trail Projects • FCT at Scholls Ferry - Working with County, THPRD, Beaverton to scope a possible signalized crossing of Scholls Ferry to supplement undercrossing that floods • Dirksen Nature Park - Camas Festival April 27 to celebrate park and trail improvements, using new shelter. Cattle grazing of Oak Savanna to simulate elk. • FCT at Tiedeman - Realignment and bridge complete, graffiti artist hired for retaining wall. • FCT in Fanno Creek Park, Main to Ash — Trail realignment completed with CWS Remeander project. • FCT sections in Woodard Park, Fanno Creek Park/City Hall, library to Milton Court, 85th to Tualatin River - Design underway. • FCT Bonita to Durham WWTP — Alignment study starting. �H n r 4111111''. C I I' Y _.. (-) I, T T G A R D .,, , ,„,•,„ ,,.., ..., ,,, . , ,' ' ',,,,,.., 11% , ‘.. ........ , . .. .„;,,. .. „. ,c..,