The URL can be used to link to this page

UFR2019-00001 UFR2O19 - 00001 ELDERBERRY RIDGE NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION URBAN FORESTRY REVIEW UFR2019-00001 1111 IN MODIFICATION OF URBAN FORESTRY PLAN FOR ELDERBERRY RIDGE TIGARD 120 DAYS = May 7, 2019 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: Elderberry Ridge CASE NO.: Urban Forestry Review(UFR) UFR2019-00001 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to modify the Urban Forestry Plan approved under the Elderberry Ridge Planned Development (Case Nos. PDR2016-00009, SUB2016- 00007, and SLR2016-00009). Specifically the applicant proposes to reduce the number of street trees proposed for planting,and to pay a fee in-lieu of planting five (5) street trees. The applicant also proposes to preserve three (3) trees in Tracts D and E that were originally proposed for removal, and to plant two (2) new on-site trees. APPLICANT: Riverside Homes,LLC Attn: Niki Munson 17933 NW Evergreen Place, Suite 370 Beaverton, OR 97006 OWNER: Same as applicant LOCATION: South of SW Bonita Road,west of SW 74th Avenue,and east of SW 79th Avenue WCTM 2S 112BD,Tax Lots 10500 to 14400 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential Zone. The R-4.5 zone is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory dwelling units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are permitted conditionally. R-7: Medium-Density Residential Zone.The R-7 zone is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory dwelling units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks are permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.520 UFR2019-00001 Elderberry Ridge —Urban Forestry Plan Modification 1 SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request,subject to a condition of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. CONDITION OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITION MUST BE SATISFIED: Unless noted otherwise, the staff contact shall be Lina Smith,Assistant Planner; (503) 718-2438 or LinaCS@tigard-or.gov. 1. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant must pay a fee in-lieu of planting five (5) street trees. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information: The applicant proposes to modify the Urban Forestry Plan approved under the Elderberry Ridge Planned Development (Case Nos. PDR2016-00009, SUB2016-00007, and SLR2016-00009), which is located south of SW Bonita Road, west of SW 74th Avenue, and east of SW 79th Avenue. This Planned Development was approved by the City of Tigard Planning Commission in January 2017 for 40 lots.The subject properties are zoned Low-Density Residential (R-4.5) and Medium-Density Residential (R-7). SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS 18.520.070 Modification to the Urban Forestry Plan Component of an Approved Land Use Application A. Approval process. Except as exempted in Subsection 18.520.070.B, an application for a modification to the urban forestry plan component of an approved land use shall be processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050, using the approval criteria in Subsection 18.520.070.C. The applicant proposes to modify the Urban Forestry Plan approved under the Elderberry Ridge Planned Development (Case Nos. PDR2016-00009, SUB2016-00007, and SLR2016-00009). Specifically the applicant proposes to reduce the number of street trees proposed for planting,and to pay a fee in-lieu of planting five (5) street trees. This proposal is not exempt from the Type I Urban Forestry Plan Modification. Therefore, this application is subject to the approval criteria outlined below. The applicant also proposes to preserve three (3) trees in Tracts D and E that were originally proposed for removal, and to plant two (2) new on-site trees. However, these modifications are exempt from the Type I Urban Forestry Plan Modification, as they result in the same or greater amount of effective tree canopy that was calculated in the original Urban Forestry Plan (CDC 18.520.070.B.2). C. Approval criteria. The approval authority shall approve or approve with conditions the modification to the urban forestry plan component of an approved land use application when all of the following are met: UFR2019-00001 Elderberry Ridge —Urban Forestry Plan Modification 2 1. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that the previously approved urban forestry plan did not account for the circumstances that lead to the proposed modification; The project arborist has provided a revised report and statement (dated October 18,2017) certifying that the previously approved Urban Forestry Plan did not account for the circumstances that led to the proposed modification. During the construction process, the developer encountered conflicts with the locations of underground utilities and proposed driveways that were not anticipated during land use review. These conflicts will result in the developer planting fewer street trees than what was originally approved with the Elderberry Ridge Planned Development. The linear amount of street frontage for this development is 2,673 feet; therefore, this development is required to have a minimum of 67 street trees (2,673 feet divided by 40 feet,rounded to the nearest whole number).The applicant proposes to plant 62 street trees,and to pay a fee in-lieu of planting five (5) street trees. Staff finds this proposal meets the minimum street tree requirements outlined in CDC 18.320.040.B, and has included a condition of approval for the applicant to pay the fee in-lieu prior to issuance of building permits. Additionally, the revised supplemental report demonstrates how this development will continue to exceed minimum effective tree canopy requirements for the R-4.5 and R- 7 Zones. This criterion is met. 2. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed modification; and The applicant has provided a revised report and statement certifying that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed modification. This criterion is met. 3. The project arborist or landscape architect demonstrates through a revised urban forestry plan, compliance with Section 18.520.030. (Ord. 17-22 §2) The applicant submitted a revised Urban Forestry Plan and supplemental report that demonstrate compliance with CDC 18.520.030, including tree preservation, protection, and canopy standards. This criterion is met. CONCLUSION: As demonstrated in the analysis above, the proposed modification to the Urban Forestry Plan Component of the approved Elderberry Ridge Planned Development meets all applicable approval criteria. SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was provided to: X The applicant and owner Final Decision: A Modification to the Urban Forestry Plan Component of an Approved Land Use Application is a Type I Procedure. As such, the Director's decision is final for purposes of appeal on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. The Director's decision is not appealable locally, and is the final decision of the City. UFR2019-00001 Elderberry Ridge —Urban Forestry Plan Modification 3 THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 7, 2019, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 8, 2019. Questions: If you have any questions, please contact Lina Smith at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCS@tigard-or.gov. - � January 7,2019 APPROVED BY: Lina Smith,Assistant Planner Community Development Director's Designee UFR2019-00001 Elderberry Ridge -Urban Forestry Plan Modification 4 M� r RECEIVED City of Tigard JAN 0 3 2019 1111 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r T( 7"CARD TIGARD Minor Modification Type I Aflicàtidh • PROPOSAL SUMMARY (Brief description) REQUIRED SUBMITTAL y , ELEMENTS /14,b---rt r �' ��/7,e) Owner's Signature/Written 7 S" 1)//1-"JVAuthorization KTitle Transfer Instrument or Deed Site Plan(2 large plans drawn to scale and one reduced to 8.5"x11'/2") C./ 7 7 j— ;id l t-'- Applicant's Statement/Narrative Property address/location(s): (2 copies)Address criteria in: 77 ,i-70-a g 2<i TDC 18.780.040.B Tax map and tax lot #(s): 2 S %(2-131) `-/'7-D( Ste, 4' , Filing Fee S t( a-zi / t� /� 7,/ FOR STAFF USE ONLY / Site size: '7 Case No.: °Fero/9— °pc°/ Applicant*: CVS PE /717/1W J C_ C Related CaseNo.(s): Address: /7 9. 3 (V4A/ �' ` �' '� /'mac Application Fee: LOT City/state: 6(-1.(-'164-1e--'171'" 2 Zip: Application accepted: Phone: CO3-1-ec4.S—^Oq0 Email: /V ONti vn/.lori�, ✓ �0�� By: Date: //gii Application determined complete: PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER(S)* XiSame as Applicant f i By: ...$Date: Name: I:\CommunityDevelopment\Land UseApplications\02_Formsa nd Address: Templates\Land Use Applications Rev.12/14/2017 City/state: Zip: * When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the Contact name: purchaser of record or a lessee inpossession Phone number: with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner.The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT The applicant's statement must include a summary of the proposed changes.Criteria in either 18.780.040(B) or 18.740.020(B) (2) must be addressed with a detailed response to each criterion. Failure to provide the information needed to process the application would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. In addition,the Director must find that the proposed change is in compliance with all applicable requirements of Title 18 of the Tigard Development Code.To complete this review,the Applicant's proposal must include a discussion indicating how the site expansion/change will continue to comply with the maximum setback,building height,parking,and landscaping standards. Other requirements of this title such as clear vision,solid waste storage,non-conforming situations,signs,and tree removal may also be applicable depending on the type and location of the proposed modifications. City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of 2 APPLICANTS To consider an application complete,you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. S- S '1. of each owner of the subject property required. • //'3//7, App: . i_'.' re Print name //123/FY /---6-C Date se.4,( 4 r‘,(40 VV/1 Owner's signature Print nude Date Owner's signature Print name Date ADDITIONAL OWNER/DEED HOLDER INFORMATION Name: Name: Address: Address: City/state: Zip: City/state: Zip: Signature: Signature: MINOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • www.tigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 2 of 2 Washington County,Oregon 2018-022801 D-DW Stn=4 A STROM 04/02/2018 09:37:51 AM 515.00$11.00$5.00 520.00$2,850.00 $2,901.00 i Aat F: k `Q` f< ? THIS SPACE REC I,Richard Hobernicht,Director of Assessment and Taxation and Ex. Officio County Clerk for Washington County,Oregon,do hereby :.:,::,3:7..-......",... i-1.1N77 ...:.1, certify that the within Instrument of writing was received and -',1;..:"...:'• recorded in the book of records of said county. • ' .''` 4/4-e Richard Hobernicht,Director of ';- Assessment and Taxation,Ex-Officio After recording return to: Riverside Homes, LLC 17933 NW Evergreen Place, Ste, 370 Beaverton, OR 97006 . RED:RECE '\1ED Until a change is requested all tax 3 �0�9 , statements shall be sent to the AN 0 following address: ��;.��,�� Riverside Homes, LLC Li ry C `- 17933 NW Evergreen Place, Ste. 370 f'Lgr1N!Nt i�lGRy cR!NG Beaverton, OR 97006 File No,: 7032-2528535 (RC) Date: September 21, 2015 tri • I w STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Cornutt Enterprises, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Grantor, conveys and warrants to h Riverside Homes, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Grantee, the following described real N property free of liens and encumbrances, except as specifically set forth herein: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Real property In the County of Washington, State of Oregon, described as follows: See attached EXHIBIT "A" W - Subject to: 1. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements, if any, affecting title, which may appear in the public record, including those shown on any recorded plat or survey. The true consideration for this conveyance is $2,850,000.00. (Here comply with requirements of ORS 93030) Page 1 of 2 APN:R512056 Statutory Warranty Deed File No.:7032-2528535(RC) -continued BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE i i i LE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92,010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. Dated this 36 day of C-4,-‘ , 20 1 Cornutt Enterprises LLC, an Oregon limited liability company BY: - G `` i ` (7. �` et Janice A. Cornutt Title: Managing Member STATE OF Oregon ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on this,3 )4 day of ►P Y VC3t--e'e---4''L , 20 \5 by Janice A. Cornutt as Managing Member of Cornutt Enterprises LLC, on behalf of the limited liability company. 4110 401° OOP• ii,� -- OFFICIAL STAMP - r.�_.., RANADA RAE CAMPBELL ,. NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Notary Public for Oregon mow. ., ' 1 ' COMMISSION NO.9623434 My commission expires: 5' 1 Io ' E.•<5'.2— ) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16,2021 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Real property in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, described as follows: Parcel I: Lots 39 and 42, DURHAM ACRES, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Parcel II: Lots 40, 41 and 52, DURHAM ACRES, in the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon. Parcel III: Lot 51, DURHAM ACRES, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Parcel IV: Lot 54, DURHAM ACRES, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Excepting therefrom that portion being described in documents recorded June 17, 2005 as Fee No. 2005 069221. Parcel V: Lot 33, excepting that part lying East of Fanno Creek, DURHAM ACRES, in the City of Tigard,County of Washington, State of Oregon. Parcel VI: of 43, DURHAM ACRES, in the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and all that portion of Lot 38, DURHAM ACRES, in the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon lying North of the North line of that tract of land conveyed to Nicholas L. Cannard and Valerie K. Cannard by Deed recorded December 6, 1972 in Book 900 Page 238 Washington County Deed Records. NOTE:This legal description was created prior to January 1, 2008. Elderberry Ridge Planned Development RECEiVED Urban Forestry Plan Modification Narrative JAN 0 3 2019 of Tigard Planning Commission Final Order No.2016-09 CITY OF TICA D PLANNIN{r { OGINEERINC 18.520.070 Modification to the Urban Forestry Plan Component of an Approved Land Use Application A. Approval process. Except as exempted in Subsection 18.520.070.B, an application for a modification to the urban forestry plan component of an approved land use shall be processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050, using the approval criteria in Subsection 18.520.070.C. 18.710.050 Type I Procedure A. Decision requirements. The director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the requested application or action based on the applicable approval criteria and development standards. B. Final decision. The director's decision is final for purposes of appeal on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. The director's decision is not appealable locally, and is the final decision of the city. C. Effective date. The director's decision is effective on the day after it is final. Applicant Response This modification to the approved Urban Forestry Plan for the Elderberry Ridge Planned Development is submitted as provided for in Subsection 18.520.070.A. There are no exemptions involved and thus Subsection 18.520.070.B is not applicable to this request. This modification to the approved Urban Forestry Plan is submitted and processed as a Type I procedure. A completed and signed Type 1 Minor Modification application form is submitted along with the required items, including filing fee, this applicant narrative and copies of the approved Urban Forestry Site Plan sheets. In addition, also included with this Type I application is a copy of the October 2017 Urban Forestry Plan for Elderberry Ridge prepared by Morgan Holen & Associated, the project Arborist. This report was submitted to City Planning in Fall 2017 as part of the final engineering plan review and approval process. The approval criteria in Subsection 18.520.070.0 are addressed herein below. C. Approval criteria. The approval authority shall approve or approve with conditions the modification to the urban forestry plan component of an approved land use application when all of the following are met: 1. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that the previously approved urban forestry plan did not account for the circumstances that lead to the proposed modification; Applicant Response The previously approved urban forestry plan did not account for site plan revisions that lead to the proposed modifications. The previously approved urban forestry plan was based on the design Page 1 of 2 phase site plan, which was revised with construction documents. The total number of building lots was reduced from 43 to 40, two trees in a vegetated buffer(tract D) must be retained, and one tree in tract E can also be retained based on the revised lot layout. Proposed street trees were adjusted provided more detailed information regarding driveway locations and underground utilities. The proposed modifications were unavoidable considering the revised site plan. The City's canopy cover requirements continue to be satisfied, however a payment in lieu of street tree planting is required for five trees. 2. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed modification; and Applicant Response There is no practicable alternative to the proposed modifications. Justifications for the proposed modifications have been described throughout this report. These changes provide the most practicable Urban Forestry Plan for the project and satisfy the City's requirements. 3. The project arborist or landscape architect demonstrates through a revised urban forestry plan, compliance with Section 18.790.030. Applicant Response This revised Urban Forestry Plan is provided in compliance with Section 18.790.030. Note that a street tree payment in lieu is required for five trees. Page 2 of 2 r �1 �1971 .409.9354 4° 3 Monroe Mog a l l HoleI Parkway,Suite P 220 Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 —cam— AJf OCIATLfu«- Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management morgan.holen@comcast.net CITY OFTIGARD REEI\ ED Approved y Planning Date: l I9 JAN 0 3 2019 ICITY OF TIGARD INSInitials: . PLANNING/ENGINEERING Urban Forestry Plan Supplemental Report May 30, 2016 Revised: October 18, 2017 Elderberry Ridge Subdivision Tigard, Oregon 971.409.9354 Morgan Holen 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P 220 Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 -- — Af f o C l AT L/ Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management morgan.holen@comcast.net Table of Contents— Purpose 1 Scope of Work and Limitations 1 General Description 2 Effective Tree Canopy Cover 2 Specifications 3 A.Tree Protection Specifications 3 B.Soil Characteristics and Specifications for Improvement 4 C.Tree Planting Specifications 4 Criteria for Urban Forestry Plan Modifications 5 Signature of Approval 5 Enclosures— Attachment A: Existing Tree Inventory Data Attachment B: Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary Attachment C: Planted Tree Inventory Attachment D:Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan Attachment E:Tree Canopy Site Plan Not Applicable— Existing Stand Inventory Data Planted Stand Inventory Stand Preservation Specifications Stand Planting Specifications Tree Canopy Fee Calculation tIP 971.409.9354 Morgan Holen 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P 220 Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 --g--&/JO C I AT Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management morgan.holen@comcast.net Urban Forestry Plan - Supplemental Report Elderberry Ridge Subdivision, Tigard, Oregon May 30, 2016 Revised: October 18, 2017 MHA15074 Purpose This Urban Forestry Plan for the Elderberry Ridge Subdivision project located in R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts in Tigard, Oregon, is provided pursuant to the City of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual.The subject property is located southwest of the existing terminus of SW 76th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon (2S-1-12BD Tax Lots 300, 400, 500, 600, 1500 and 2S-1-12CA Tax Lot 100).This report describes the existing trees located on the project site, provides arborist recommendations for tree removal, retention and protection, and describes the effective tree canopy cover needed to meet City requirements.The tree inventory fieldwork was completed by International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist (PN- 0497A) and Qualified Tree Risk Assessor Walt Knapp during a site visit conducted on May 20, 2016.This report has been prepared by ISA Board Certified Master Arborist(PN-6145B) and Qualified Tree Risk Assessor Morgan Holen working in collaboration with Walt Knapp and Westlake Consultants.This report was modified on October 18,2017 based on site plan revisions including reducing the number of lots from 43 to 40 and retaining three trees previously planned for removal.The size of lots and lineal length of street frontage has changed which affected the planted tree inventory and effective tree canopy cover summary. Modifications are identified in bold underlined type.These changes are not exempt from a Type I land use decision to modify the Urban Forestry Plan component of an approved land use permit.The relevant criteria are discussed herein.The applicant will be required to pay a $711 review fee to the City. Scope of Work and Limitations Morgan Holen &Associates, LLC, was contracted by Riverside Homes to visually assess existing trees measuring six inches in diameter and larger in terms of general condition and suitability for preservation with development and prepare an Urban Forestry Plan to satisfy City of Tigard code requirements.The site is planned for residential development, including 43 lots, new streets, and storm water tracts.A site plan was provided by Westlake Consultants illustrating the location of trees and tree survey point numbers, and potential construction impacts. Visual Tree Assessment(VTA1) was performed on individual trees located across the site.Trees were evaluated in terms of species, size, general condition, suitability for preservation, and potential construction impacts, and treatment recommendations include remove, retain, or protect off-site. Limited visual assessment was performed for off-site trees located directly adjacent to the project site because access for complete assessment was not authorized on adjacent private properties. Following the inventory fieldwork, we coordinated with Westlake Consultants to discuss and finalize treatment recommendations based on the proposed site plan. The client may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations contained herein, or seek additional advice. Neither this author nor Morgan Holen &Associates, LLC, have assumed any responsibility for liability associated with the trees on or adjacent to this site. 1 Visual Tree Assessment(VTA):The standard process of visual tree inspection whereby the inspector visually assesses the tree from a distance and up close,looking for defect symptoms and evaluating overall condition and vitality. Urban Forest Plan—Supplemental Report Elderberry Ridge Subdivision,Tigard,OR May 30,2016 I Revised:October 18, 2017 Page 2 General Description The complete site includes three existing homes, which will be demolished for site development. In all, 72 trees measuring six inches and larger in diameter were inventoried, including 18 different species and 21 trees located off-site within 25-feet of the development impact area. Of the 51 on-site trees,49% received condition ratings of less than two and 53% received suitability for preservation ratings of less than two. The 21 off-site trees can be protected during construction. The trees to be protected off-site will not require much consideration due to their distance from proposed construction impacts, except for tree #31799, a 4-inch diameter Norway maple (Acer platanoides) located adjacent to the existing sidewalk along the east side of SW 76th Avenue—this tree is located adjacent to street improvements associated with the project, but adequate protection can be provided with silt fencing established at the property boundary for tree protection. None of the on-site trees are planned for retention with site development,except for trees 32236 and 32237 in tract D and tree 32387 in tract E;tracts D and E are not included in the development impact area and no canopy cover credit is provided for retaining these trees.The driplines of these three trees do overlap proposed construction areas and tree protection specifications are provided.The other on-site trees are planned for removal;adequate protection is not possible based on their locations in proximity to the proposed grading, building and other site improvements. A complete description of individual trees located on and adjacent to the project site is included in the enclosed existing tree inventory data (attachment A). Effective Tree Canopy Cover In the R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts,the minimum required effective tree canopy for each lot is 15%and the minimum required effective tree canopy for the overall development site is 40%.A summary of the effective tree canopy cover by lot and across the overall development site is included as attachment B. No canopy credit is provided by off-site trees to be protected, or the three trees now planned for preservation in tracts D and E. Canopy credit will be provided by planting 64 individual trees and a stand of 11 native trees in storm water tract B. Note that tracts D and E are not subject to this Urban Forestry Plan according to Westlake Consultants. The required quantity of street trees is determined by dividing the total linear street frontage by 40. In this case, the total street frontage is 2,673 feet and 67 street trees are required. However, only 62 street trees are proposed,which is the maximum number of trees that can reasonably be planted based on the City's various spacing requirements and in an effort to satisfy canopy cover requirements by planting a mix of species with variable mature statures.The 62 proposed street trees provide the closest and best spacing possible.The proposed street trees comply with the street tree planting standards in Section 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual and with the soil volume standards in Section 12. Per Section 18.745.040.G, "In cases where it is not practicable to provide the minimum number of required street trees,the director may allow the applicant to remit payment into the urban forestry fund for tree planting and early establishment in an amount equivalent to the city's cost to plant and maintain a street tree for three years (per the street tree planting standards in the Urban Forestry Manual)for each tree below the minimum required." In this case, payment of an in lieu of planting Urban Forest Plan—Supplemental Report Elderberry Ridge Subdivision,Tigard,OR May 30,2016 I Revised:October 18,2017 Page 3 fee is proposed for five street trees in order to satisfy the street tree planting requirement.The City's 17/18 Fee Schedule lists the applicable fee as $566 per tree.The required total payment in lieu of street tree planting is$2,830. In addition to the 62 proposed street trees and in order to satisfy the 40%effective tree canopy cover requirement for the overall development site, one tree is proposed on each of lots 16 and 20. In addition to the 64 individual trees described in the planted tree inventory (attachment C),tract B includes a planted stand of native trees.Tree quantities were determined by Westlake Consultants based on CWS standards and include four cascaras (Rhamnus purshiana),four Oregon ashes (Fraxinus latifolia), and three bitter cherries(Prunus emarqinata). The effective tree canopy cover summary(attachment B) demonstrates that the minimum effective tree canopy cover requirements are satisfied for each lot and tract, and the overall development site. The Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan and Tree Canopy Site Plan are enclosed as attachments D and E as required by Section 10 of the Urban Forestry Manual, which illustrate how the Urban Forestry Plan requirements are met. Specifications A. Tree Protection Specifications 1. Tree Protection Zone.The project arborist shall designate the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ). Where feasible,the TPZ shall be established at the dripline of protected trees as a minimum.The location of the TPZ shall be shown on construction drawings. If infrastructure must be installed closer to the trees,the TPZ may be established within the dripline area if the project arborist determines that the trees will not be unduly damaged. The contractor is responsible for coordinating with the project arborist prior to working beneath protected tree driplines. 2. Protection Fencing.All trees to be retained shall be protected by 5-foot tall metal fencing unless otherwise approved by the city manager or designee. Protection fencing shall be secured to steel posts placed no further than 8-feet apart and shall be installed at the edge of the TPZ. Exception:Silt fencing is recommended for the protection of off-site tree#31799. 3. Preconstruction Conference.The project arborist shall be on site to discuss methods of tree removal and tree protection prior to any construction. 4. Pruning.The project arborist can help identify if and where pruning is necessary once trees planned for removal have been removed and the site is staked and prepared for construction. Pruning shall be performed by a Qualified Tree Service. 5. Tree Protection Zone Maintenance.The protection fencing shall not be moved, removed, or entered by equipment except under direction of the project arborist. 6. Storage of Material or Equipment.The contractor shall not store materials or equipment within the TPZ. 7. Excavation. Excavation beneath protected tree driplines shall be avoided if alternatives are available. If excavation is unavoidable,the project arborist shall evaluate the proposed excavation to determine methods to minimize impacts to Urban Forest Plan—Supplemental Report Elderberry Ridge Subdivision,Tigard,OR May 30,2016 I Revised: October 18, 2017 Page 4 trees. All construction beneath the dripline of protected trees shall be under the on- site technical supervision of the project arborist. 8. Landscaping. Following construction and where landscaping is desired, apply approximately 3-inches of mulch beneath the dripline of protected trees, but not directly against tree trunks. Shrubs and ground covers may be planted within tree protection areas. If irrigation is used, use drip irrigation only beneath the driplines of protected trees. 9. Tree Protection Inspection.The project arborist shall inspect and verify the location of protection measures prior to construction, monitor tree protection measures regularly, and provide biweekly written reports to the City during periods of active construction. 10. Final Report.After the project has been completed,the project arborist shall provide a final report that describes the measures needed to maintain and protect the remaining trees. B. Soil Characteristics and Specifications for Improvement Native soils at the project site consist of Hillsboro loam (-87%) and Quatama loam (-13%), which are both deep, well drained and capable of supporting healthy tree growth. No soil amendments are proposed, but could be recommended by the landscape contractor at the time of new tree installation. If soil compaction occurs during construction, the project arborist should provide additional recommendations as needed. C. Tree Planting Specifications New trees that are planted to meet the effective canopy requirements should conform to the applicable standards in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual and be planted in accordance with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)standards for tree planting (A300, Part 6) and additional standards adopted by the Oregon Landscape Contractors Board. Nursery stock should meet the requirements of the American Association of Nurserymen for nursery stock (ANSI Z60.1)for Grade No.1 or better. Double stake trees if needed for stability during the establishment period. Root barriers shall be installed according to manufacturer's specifications when a street tree is planted within five feet of any hard surface, paving, or utility box. If needed, irrigation should be design/build by the landscape contractor. Criteria for Urban Forestry Plan Modifications Tigard Municipal Code Section 18.790.070 requires that any modification to the urban forestry plan component of an approved land use permit shall be processed as a Type I land use decision.There are exemptions to the Type I procedure,which are not applicable in this case.Therefore,the approval criteria in subsection D of this section are applicable: 1. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that the previously approved urban forestry plan did not account for the circumstances that lead to the proposed modification; The previously approved urban forestry plan did not account for site plan revisions that lead to the proposed modifications.The previously approved urban forestry plan was based on the design phase site plan,which was revised with construction documents.The total number of building lots was reduced from 43 to 40,two trees in a vegetated buffer(tract D) must be retained, and one tree in tract E can also be retained based on the revised lot Urban Forest Plan—Supplemental Report Elderberry Ridge Subdivision,Tigard,OR May 30,2016 I Revised:October 18,2017 Page 5 layout. Proposed street trees were adjusted provided more detailed information regarding driveway locations and underground utilities.The proposed modifications were unavoidable considering the revised site plan. The City's canopy cover requirements continue to be satisfied, however a payment in lieu of street tree planting is required for five trees. 2. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed modification;and There is no practicable alternative to the proposed modifications. Justifications for the proposed modifications have been described throughout this report.These changes provide the most practicable Urban Forestry Plan for the project and satisfy the City's requirements. 3. The project arborist or landscape architect demonstrates through a revised urban forestry plan,compliance with Section 18.790.030. This revised Urban Forestry Plan is provided in compliance with Section 18.790.030. Note that a street tree payment in lieu is required for five trees. Signature of Approval We hereby attest that, to the best of our knowledge: ✓ The attached Tree Preservation and Removal site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10, Part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual; ✓ The attached Tree Canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10, Part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual; and V This Supplemental Report meets all of the requirements in Section 10, Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Thank you for choosing Morgan Holen &Associates, LLC,to provide consulting arborist services for the Progress Landing Subdivision project in Tigard. Please contact us if you have questions or need any additional information. Thank you, Morgan Holen &Associates, LLC: f. 41-„..64,_ Morga E. Holen, Owner/Member ISA Board Certified Master Arborist, PN-6145B ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Forest Biologist Enclosures: Attachment A: Existing Tree Inventory Data Attachment B: Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary Attachment C: Planted Tree Inventory Attachment D:Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan Attachment E:Tree Canopy Site Plan 'iliP Attachment A: Existing Tree Inventory Data Morgan Nolen MHA15074 Elderberry Ridge-Tree Data 5-20-16 Rev. 10-18-17.xlsx —6-----AfjOCIATL/ `t, Page 1of3 No. Lot No. Common Name Species Name DBH1 C-Rad2 Canopy3 0/S4 HT5 Cond6 I Pres' Comments Treatment 5118 Off-site 1arborvitae Thuja N/A N/A O No , N/A N/A!not a tree tunaffected 5173 Off-site 'plum Prunus sp. 4 6 - 0 No 21 2 below 6" diameter threshold unaffected 5264 ROW Norway maple Acer platanoides 4 6 - 0 No 3 3 below 6" diameter threshold unaffected 5265 ROW Norway maple Acer platanoides j 4 6 - O No 3, 3 below 6" diameter threshold unaffected 5368 28 pear Pyrus sp. 12 8 - 0 No 2' 2 remove 5377 32 European white birch Betula pendula 21 24 - 1 0 No 0, 01 remove 5378 32 European white birch Betula pendula 2x25 25 - 0 No 11 1 remove 5379 ROW European white birch Betula pendula 8', 25 - 0 No 11 1 remove 5380 ROW European white birch Betula pendula 14 27 - 0 No 1f 1 ;remove 5385 34 European white birch Betula pendula22' 25 - 0 I No 0 0 remove 5395 26 English walnut Juglans regia 251 24 - 0 1 No 3, 3 remove 5396 26 English walnut Juglans regia 3x12; 8 - 0 No 0, 01 ",remove 5397 33 English holly Ilex aquifolium 9x5 12 - 0 No 3 21 remove 5398 32 western redcedar Thuja plicata 130 17 - 0 No 3 2 remove 31292 ROW English hawthorn Crataegus monogyna 6 8 - 0 No 1 11 i remove 31338 Off-site Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 8' 18 - 0 No 21 2 unaffected 31363 Off-site Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 8 18 - 0 No 3 3i ,unaffected 31364 Off-site Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 141 23 - O I No2j 2 unaffected 31365 Off-site Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 30 331 - 0 1 No 31 3 unaffected 31366 Off-site ;Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 14 30' - 1 0 No 2 21 (unaffected 31367 Off-site l Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 16 28 - 0 No 3 3 unaffected 31368 Off-site Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 20 301 - O No 3 3 lunaffected 31369 Off-site Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 12 201 - j O No 1 1I (unaffected 31389 Off-site cherry 'Prunus sp. 14 16� - 1 0 No 2'i 2 unaffected 31582 Off-site pear Pyrus sp. 4 7 - 0 No 3 3 below 6" diameter threshold (unaffected 31583 Off-site pear Pyrus sp. 7 8 - 0 No 3 31 'unaffected 31615 ROW 1 Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 34 231 - O No 1 1 powerline/decay ;remove 31799 Off-site 1Norway maple Acer platanoides 4 6; - 0 No 3 3!below 6" diameter threshold protect 31800 Off-site Norway maple Acer platanoides 4 6 - 1 0 No 3 3 below 6" diameter threshold 1 protect 31826 Off-site Norway maple Acer platanoides 4 6 - 0 No 31 3 below 6" diameter threshold I unaffected 31827 Off-site 1 red maple Acer rubrum 5 6 - O No 3 3i below 6" diameter threshold unaffected 31828 Off-site red maple Acer rubrum 6 6 - O No 31 31 1unaffected 31829 Off-site Fred maple Acer rubrum 6 6 - O No 1 3I 3 unaffected 31877 Off-site willow salix sp. 7 81 - O No 2 2� 'unaffected Morgan Ilolen & Associates, LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway, Suite P220, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net 1971.409.9354 k� Attachment A: Existing Tree Inventory Data Morgan I en MHA15074 Elderberry Ridge-Tree Data 5-20-16 Rev. 10-18-17.xlsx —&--Aff OCIATL/ Page 2 of 3 No. Lot No. Common Name Species Name DBH1 C-Rad2 LCanopy3 0/S4 HT5 Cond6 I Pres' ; Comments Treatment 31878 Off-site plum Prunus sp. 6 8 - 1 0 No 11 1' unaffected 31887 Off-site Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 18 17 - 0 No 3 3 unaffected 31941 ROW Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 30 23 - 0 No j 1, 0i utility poles/decay/missing top remove 31950 ROW shore pine Pinus contorta 6 6 - 0 No 21 0 'remove 31951 ROW ;shore pine Pinus contorta 6 6 - 0 No 2! 0 remove 31952 ROW (shore pine Pinus contorta 6 5 - 0 No 2, 2 remove 31961 34 European white birch Betula pendula 3x18 22 - 0 No . 2j 2 remove 31995 35 black cottonwood Populus trichocarpa 60 30 - 0 No 2, 21 remove _ _ 31996 35 English hawthorn Crataegus monogyna 18 10 - 0 No 21, 21 remove 32013 ROW chestnut Castanea sp. i 6 8 - 0 No 2 2 remove 32105 37 European white birch Betula pendula 8 8 - 0 No 1 2 2 remove 32124 35 black cottonwood Populus trichocarpa 4x10 8 - O No 2 2 I remove _ 32177 ROW ichestnut Castanea sp. 65 36 - 0 No 3 3 remove _ 32188 24 Iwestern redcedar Thuja plicata 22 15. - 0 No 3; 3 remove 32217 ROW European white birch Betula pendula 2x18 20 - 1 0 No 2; 2 remove 322281 9 Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia � 2x241 18. - 0 No 1 1 decay/missing top remove 32229 5 Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 271 21 - 0 No 1' 1 decay remove 32230 5 Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 2x20 20 - 0 No 1 1 decay I remove 32231' 5 Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 30, 25i - 0 No - 1 1 decay remove 32232 5 Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolio 24 22 - 0 No 2 2 remove 32233 4 Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 30' 27 - 0 No 11 1 duplicate of 15061/dead branches remove 32234 1 i English walnut Ju laps regio 3x24 24 - 0 No 1i g 9 91 duplicate of 15060/decay remove 32235 1 Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 24 29 - 0 No 1 1 duplicate of 15059/dead branches I remove 32236 Tract B l Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 241 15 - _ 0 No 3 3 bark damage from livestock ,remove 32237 Tract D I Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 27 19 n/a 0 No 2 2 bark damage from livestock retain 32238 Tract D 1black cottonwood Populus trichocarpa 30 24, n/a 0 No 2 2 bark damage from livestock retain 32239 Tract B �black cottonwood Populus trichocarpa 44 28 - 0 No 2 2 bark damage from livestock remove 32240 Tract B I black cottonwood Populus trichocarpa 38 221 - 0 No 01 0 bark damage from livestock remove 32241 Tract B ,black cottonwood Populus trichocarpa 14' 14' - 0 No 0 0 bark damage from livestock remove 32242 Tract B black cottonwood Populus trichocarpa 35' 17 - 0 No 0 0 bark damage from livestock remove Morgan rlolen & Associates, LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway, Suite P220, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net 1971.409.9354 ifi? 1�� I� 1 Attachment A: Existing Tree Inventory Data Morgan I I l en MHA15074 Elderberry Ridge-Tree Data 5-20-16 Rev. 10-18-17.xlsx —8..—AJJOCIATLi it. Page3of3 No. Lot No. Common Name Species Name DBH 1 C-Rad2 Canopy3 0/S4 HT5 Cond6 Pres7 Comments Treatment 32243 Tract B lOregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 2x15 17 - 0 No 2 2 remove 32244 Tract B black cottonwood Populus trichocarpa 2x30 16 - 0 No 1 1 remove 32270 17 English walnut Juglans regia 36 20 - 0 No 2 2 remove 32314 21 cherry Prunus sp. 6 12 - 0 No 2 2 remove 32315 21 cherry Prunus sp. 19 14 - 0 No 1' 1 remove 32316 21 I English hawthorn Crataegus monogyna 19 12 - I O No j 1 1 remove 32385 18 weeping willow Salix babylonica 52 17 - 0 No 1 1 I remove 32386 20 I magnolia Magnolia sp. 26 17 - 0 No 31 3 remove 32387 Tract E I Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 60 28 n/a 0 No 3 2 retain 1DBH is tree diameter measured at 4.5-feet above the ground level in inches; trees with multiple trunks splitting below DBH are measured separately and individual trunk measurements are separated by a comma, except multiple trunks of the same size are indicated as quantity x size. 2C-Rad is the average crown radius measured in feet. 3Canopy is the average tree canopy area (ft2) for on-site trees to be retained with Condition and Preservation ratings >2, calculated as: Canopy = (Average Tree Canopy Spread/ 2)2 x p. 40/S identifies the trees as either Open Grown or Stand Grown. 5HT identifies whether or not the tree is a Heritage Tree (either Y for yes or N for no). 6Cond is the numerical condition rating (0-3) for on-site trees as defined in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual: RATING VIGOR CANOPY DENSITY DEADWOOD FAILURE HISTORY PESTS DECAY 0 dead to severe decline <30% major scaffold branches >1 scaffold Infested major conks and cavities 1 declining 30-60% twig and branch dieback scaffold branches Infested one to a few conks; small cavities 2 average 60-90% small twigs small branches Minor present only at pruning wounds 3 good to excellent 90-100% little or none none None absent to present only at pruning wounds 'Pres is the numerical suitability for preservation rating (0-3) for on-site trees as defined in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual: RATING CONSIDERATIONS The tree is a "hazard tree" as defined in chapter 18.120 of the Tigard Development Code and "hazard tree abatement" as defined in Chapter 18.120 in the Tigard Development 0 Code cannot be completed in a manner that results in tree retention consistent with tree care industry standards. The tree is dead, in severe decline, or declining but may still be retained if desirable for wildlife or other benefits because it is not considered a "hazard tree" or "hazard tree 1 abatement" could be performed. The tree has average health and/or structural stability that could be alleviated with treatment; the tree will be less resilient to development impacts and will require more 2 frequent management and monitoring after development than a tree rated as a "3". The tree has good to excellent health and structural stability; the tree will be more resilient to development impacts, and will require less frequent management and monitoring 3 after development than a tree rated as a "2". Morgan Nolen & Associates, LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway, Suite P220, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net 1971.409.9354 HolenAttachment B: Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary 1141 MOrgarl MHA15074 Elderberry Ridge - Tree Data 5-20-16 Rev. 10-18-17.xlsx AJJOCIATEI Pagelof2 2x Canopy Area (sq. ft.) 2x Canopy Area (sq. ft.) 1.25 x Mature Mature Canopy 1.25x Mature Effective % of Preserved Trees of Preserved Stands Canopy Area Area (sq. ft.) of Canopy Area Tree Canopy Canopy Lot Area (w/ condition and (w/ condition and (sq. ft.) of Native Non-Native (sq. ft.) of Area (sq. ft.) (Canopy Area Lot No. (sq. ft.) preservation rating > 2) preservation rating > 2) Planted Trees Planted Trees Planted Stands per Lot / Lot Area) Lot 1 5,959 - - 2,454 - - 2,454 41% Lot 2 4,532 - - 2,454 - - 2,454 54% Lot 3 4,750 I - - 2,454 - - 2,454 52% Lot 4 4,275 - - 2,454 - - 2,454 57% Lot 5 3,895 - - 2,454 - - 2,454 63% Lot 6 3,800 - - 2,454 - - 2,454 65% Lot 7 7,722 - - - 1,964 - 1,964 25% Lot 8 7,160 - - 4,908 1,473 - 6,381 89% Lot 9 7,705 - - - 1,473 - 1,473 19% Lot 10 7,169 - - 4,908 1,473 - 6,381 89% Lot 11 4,440 i - - - 1,747 - 1,747 39% Lot 12 5,247 - - - 1,256 - 1,256 24% Lot 13 j 5,071 - - - 1,256 j - 1,256 25% Lot 14 4,818 - - - 1,256 - 1,256 26% Lot 15 4,800 - - - 1,256 - 1,256 26% Lot 16 5,664 - - 2,454 982 - 3,436 61% Lot 17 t 4,512 - - - 1,256 - 1,256 28% Lot 18 4,211 - - 2,454 - - 2,454 58% Lot 19 4,679 - - 2,454 - - 2,454 52% Lot 20 5,778 - - , 2,454 982 - 1 3,436 59% Lot 21 5,469 - - - 1,256 - 1,256 23% Lot 22 3,997 - - - 3,003 - 3,003 75% Lot 23 T 3,677 - - - 1,256 - 1,256 34% Lot 24 3,060 - - ! - , 491 - 491 16% Lot 25 1 3,060 - - - 1,256 - 1,256 41% Lot 26 3,061 i - - - 1,256 - 1,256 41% Lot 27 3,131 - - - , 491 - 491 16% Lot 28 6,348 - - - 1,256 - 1 1,256 20% Lot 29 5,050 - - - 1,747 - 1,747 35% Morgan Nolen & Associates, LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway, Suite P220, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net 1971.409.9354 Attachment B: Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary Morgan Holen MHA15074 Elderberry Ridge - Tree Data 5-20-16 Rev. 10-18-17.xlsx AJJOCIAT Page 2 of 2 2x Canopy Area (sq. ft.) 2x Canopy Area (sq. ft.) 1.25 x Mature Mature Canopy 1.25x Mature Effective % of Preserved Trees of Preserved Stands Canopy Area Area (sq. ft.) of Canopy Area Tree Canopy Canopy Lot Area (w/condition and (w/ condition and (sq.ft.) of Native Non-Native (sq. ft.) of Area (sq. ft.) (Canopy Area Lot No. (sq. ft.) preservation rating > 2) preservation rating > 2) Planted Trees Planted Trees Planted Stands per Lot / Lot Area) Lot 30 4,300 - - - 1 1,256 - 1,256 29% Lot 31 4,300 - - - 1,256 - 1,256 j 29% Lot 32 4,300 - - - 1,256 - 1,256 29% Lot 33 3,682 - - - 1,256 - 1,256 34% Lot 34 4,187 1 - - j - 1,747 - 1,747 42% Lot 35 5,105 - - - 3,003 - 3,003 59% Lot 36 5,010 - - - 1,256 - 1,256 25% Lot 37 5,001 - - - j 1,256 - 1,256 25% Lot 38 4,992 - - - 1,256 - 1,256 25% Lot 39 4,983 ' - - - ! 1,256 - 1,256 25% Lot 40 4,973 - - - + 1,256 - 1,256 25% Tract B 20,761 - - - - 7,198 7,198 35% Total Development Site 214,634 0 0 34,353 ! 44,440 7,198 85,990 j 40.1% Notes: Effective tree canopy cover is required to be calculated on a lot/tract by lot/tract basis only in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 districts. The standard percentage of effective tree canopy cover for each lot or tract in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 districts shall be at least 15 percent. The standard percentage of effective tree canopy cover for the overall development site shall be at least: i. 40%for R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 districts, except for schools (18.130.050(J)); ii. 33%for R-12, R-25, R-40, C-N, C-C, C-G, C-P, MUE, MUE-1, MUE-2, MUC, MUR and I-P districts, except for schools(18.130.050(J)); and iii. 25%for MU-CBD, MUC-1, I-L and I-H districts, and for schools (18.130.050(J)) in all districts. Morgan Haien & Associates, LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway, Suite P220, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net 1971.409.9354 Attachment C: Planted Tree Inventory Morgan Holen MHA15074 Elderberry Ridge - Tree Data 5-20-16 Rev. 10-18-17.xlsx AJJOCIATL Page 1of3 Mature Mature Available Structured Canopy Spread Canopy Area Soil Volume Soil Volume Lot Tree No. Species Name / Common Name Size (ft.) (sq. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) Location No. 1 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 35 2 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 35 3 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 35 4 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 36 5 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 37 6 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 38 7 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 39 8 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 40 9 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 29 10 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 29 11 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 30 12 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 31 13 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 32 14 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 34 15 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 34 16 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 33 17 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 23 18 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 22 19 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 22 20 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 22 21 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 24 22 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 25 23 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 26 24 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 27 25 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 28 26 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 11 27 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 11 Morgan Molen & Associates, LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway, Suite P220, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net 1971.409.9354 gillf Attachment C: Planted Tree Inventory Morgan Holen MHA15074 Elderberry Ridge - Tree Data 5-20-16 Rev. 10-18-17.xlsx —cam– AffOCIATLi ift Page2of3 Mature Mature Available Structured Canopy Spread Canopy Area Soil Volume Soil Volume Lot Tree No. Species Name / Common Name Size (ft.) (sq. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) Location No. 28 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 12 29 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 13 30 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 14 31 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 15 32 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 16 33 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 16 34 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 20 35 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 20 36 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 21 37 katsura / Cercidiphyllus japonicum 1.5" 40 1,256 500+ n/a Street 17 38 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Street 18 39 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Street 19 40 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Street 10 41 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 10 42 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 10 43 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 10 44 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Street 10 45 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 9 46 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 9 47 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 9 48 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Street 6 49 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Street 5 50 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Street 4 51 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5"" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Street 3 52 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Street 2 53 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Street 1 54 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 7 Morgan riolen & Associates, LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway, Suite P220, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net I 971.409.9354 14 Attachment C: Planted Tree Inventory M org a n Holen MHA15074 Elderberry Ridge - Tree Data 5-20-16 Rev. 10-18-17.xlsx -- 6,� AJJ OCIATUL Page3of3 Mature Mature Available Structured Canopy Spread Canopy Area Soil Volume Soil Volume Lot Tree No. Species Name / Common Name Size (ft.) (sq. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) Location No. 55 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 7 56 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 7 57 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 7 58 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Street 8 59 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street _ 8 60 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 8 61 eastern redbud / Cercis canadensis 1.5" 25 491 500+ n/a Street 8 62 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Street 8 63 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Yard 16 64 Oregon white oak / Quercus garryana 1.5" 50 1,963 500+ n/a Yard 20 Notes: In addition to the individual trees described in this Planted Tree Inventory, Tract B includes a planted stands of native trees; tree quantities have been determined by Westlake Consultants based on CWS standards and include four Oregon ashes (Fraxinus latifolia), four cascaras (Rhamnus purshiana), and three bitter cherries (Prunus emarginata)--the total canopy cover credit for Tract B is provided in the Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary. Effective tree canopy cover requirements of 15% per lot and 40% for the overall development site are satisfied. However, 67 street trees are required based on a lineal street frontage of 2,673 feet and only 62 are prorosed. A payment in lieu of street tree planting is required for the difference of 5 street trees. Morgan riofen & Associates, LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway, Suite P220, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net j 971.409.9354 Attachment D: Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan I h.,i r::XA._ TREE PROTECTION NOTES W I s° i„). 3,677 '%.a 31878 " ,�� ` � I 32105 32124. ,, �� ! -- -- ------. LEGEND gc TREE TREE TREE I Q Uk0- 14111. • �, z 1 DRIP DRIP DRIP ,..r- PT.NO. TYPE/ RAD. TYPE/ TYPE/ ,... .. " ml m/ ` S0 -- - LINE am PT,NO. RAD. PT.NO. RAD. _ �.-- �_ I ..` (A PROPERTY TRUNK TRUNK TRUNK o �� - - DIA. (FT) DIA. (Fr) DIA. (FT) I-- '. oN ..-.. ..4Y� - -- 59008 r ��,�,.JIF ROW LINE a • 5118 EG ARB N/A 31583 DC 7 8 32229 DC 27 21 I I I I I It. 1I 4P >. ,,2,1 EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN 5173 DC 4 6 31615 DC 34 23 32230 OC 2X20 20 I I p I I 1-"'" II�� 31826 ~ 5264 DC 4 6 31799 DC 4 6 32231 DC 30 25 x a `( 40 I 9 I 38 I 37 I 36 31995 - -J1941 �Iy I1 1 / o o I ^ � a0' • 0 20' ao' eo' EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN n 5265 DC 4 6 31800 DC 4 6 32232 DC 24 22 �+ r Pr,� 31627 • • 1•0 l� 1 I I 31996 1...77... r�V�i . V. 5368 DC 12 8 31826 DC 6 32233 DC 30 27 I 1 1 I I 1-`• 1. �f MON iii r�� EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED W z�- ' I •SCALE: 1 INCH = 40 FEET 5377 DC 21 24 31827 DC 5 6 32234 OC 3X24 24 5285 �`wa- y aa -- r 5378 DC 2X25 25 31828 DC 6 6 32235 DC 24 29 • 5284 ��- -..-,,-- .1,1' _• - a e��,W J V I OF T I G EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO BE REMOVED 5 F 5379 DC 8 25 31829 DC 6 6 32236 DC 24 15 � �` -"`� 11' arA� ', r /"e•`D Vi 'u �oJJim -11kries1fiJ®'II7llpaormaia/ ii��ngilm lV°:iir:i®91Paiimmih , 1..' wv 5380 DC 14 27 31877 DC 7 8 32237 DC 27 19 rt�v ~ jam= ��21_-��639p••`lra1'w�� I I 15-`' • / • U�5 .'41' IJP � �! : 311 ■\ 5!f'S 31 1 . If ti`'+F' 31626 approved y Planning Cf) �o° 5385 DC 22 25 31878 DC 6 8 32238 OC 30 24 G SS $ .��,A•s ipa .a SD ,, 5379�T�xr -y,••;,, xo l 1,MORGANNOLEN,ATTESTTHATTHISTREE r, V oqo 5395 DC 25 24 31887 EG 18 17 32239 DC 44 28 ', ` \ .... i •�5376'' 31952' • I1111' 14�, ¢� D a f e• 1/911/ 1 PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL SITE PLAN MEETS THE w z , pl'trEwno 5396 DC 3x12 8 31941 EG 30 23 32240 DC 38 22 ■1� l�Ne�411��+�0la�1�/i tiv !.RTA1 ..�V/4`;.`•� 31950" p °� a �K' REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 10,PART 1,OF THE CITY OF O W UKp 5397 DC 905 12 31950 EG 6 6 32241 DC 14 14 �6r rli�+��l��f� �� •i �.\- I �I 1 31629_ LI L`-� ♦• • TIGARD URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL c,� 31951 EG 6 6 32242 DC 35 17 ..-. - - - - �' �':i1 ^��-± I1'' , 1 1 l t 1 a l�7. k �4-1-1-6-4.- �_ V t...4.. 5398 EG 30 17 "-.._. ...---•- .----5377 Ira ) ' � � � 2; .................... ........ �I (O` xo •11�6� W •p�,74F 31292 DC 6 8 31952 EG 6 5 32243 DC 2X35 17 I I I I a` !: - 11, c_ .............. f 31338 DC 8 18 31961 DC 3X18 22 32244 DC 2130 16 I I 1 (` ? i e ' ~ ° 1 31363 DC 19 16 31995 DC 60 30 32270 OC 36 20 S . OFF-SITE TREE SM THAN - I�ig-- _ ___30 31.-- � i lir � 'DIAMETER TO BE_ mom 31364 DC 14 23 31996 EG 18 10 32314 DC 6 12 •• Si N I --J_ I 4,0-�� KITH SILT FENCING NS ALUM 31365 DC 30 33 32013 DC 6 8 32315 DC 19 14 x oo 1 1 -' I �� -r"� 5397 T11 ��i' I AT PROPERTY BOUND Y FOR MORGAN NOLENI II32105 DC 8 8 32316 DC 19 12 1,'„") ` �' `` 133 r�tT7 'al'�I 31600 EROSION roN ISA BOARD CERTIFIED MASTER ARBORIST,PN-6145B L_LJ 31366 DC 14 30 ` ---'-.7. 32188 • \ I f 1.0. ~y2J14 ISA TREE RISK ASSESSMENT QUALIFIED 31367 DC 16 28 32124 DC 4X10 8 32385 DC 52 17 �aL 1 �� Z.y�aa�l ---�- 31799 i. I1, SIS DATE:JANUARY 18,2018 Z 31368 DC 20 30 32177 DC 65 36 32386 DC 26 17 ►-p,y3 �j r• .-_ ` ` ' t' 32316 ^yY 411 ;' rii 31369 DC 12 20 32188 EG 22 15 32387 DC 60 28 ^ • f- I '�cai r+'�- xj.�+1rr_4 - - - -- d 31389 DC 14 16 32217 DC 2%18 20 ...-..I 1` • i I i' I ` t:1�� • I r; .; c I' � `�' :''::;'.:,: TREE PROTECTION NOTES N W Ir 31582 DC 4 7 32228 a 2%24 18 N 5366 ti ` ry n, -- �1 I Trl :•.:• �/Zi 2 ( -• ) • 2 L ,I l''•`'• 1 TREE PROTECTION ZONE.THE PROJECT ARBORIST 2' I r '�I��' ) LLTFI�TABLE LEGEND N I ` ss95 I !I..+ • ;:;: '':' SHALL DESIGNATE THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE Q ''.,:.. '• ' , ( (TPZ). WHERE FEASIBLE•THE TPZ SHALL BEI ^ y ::,:,DECIDUOUS TREEx 'I J tr -/1dill 1, j; ESTAEIUSHED AT THE DRIPUNE OF PROTECTED p EG DC=EVERGREEN TREE . o I .1 , ��,y� _ �•'1�� l.' ;"l' { ` , TREES AS A MINIMUM. THE LOCATION OF THE TPZ X^ i Sr \\ SHALL BE SHOWN ON CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. IF W olly�Ilee�c��+locslt��at�ll�ilt/�it� c / 3 _} -..co� , -- ini.i. sit mkr ..._ ...•.,. e�, ■��r.........rt�INi_ ..., '�P._•,. r .I INFRASTRUCTURE MUST BE INSTALLED CLOSER TO rY i1� ----------- \ 1,�1I't 32366'1 xo THE TREES, THE TPZ MAY BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN O CK ft As; , \....., �n THE DRIPLINE AREA IF THE PROJECT ARBORIST O /�'�� •�� 1 ��/� J \ Y\ I ao DETERMINES THAT THE TREES WILL NOT BE UNDULY 2 I ... � „ --__ i.��- DAMAGED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR Ory < Z � _ .r -�� M Mr -1.war att��0e-..�� '. ,� OORDIN TING WITH THE PROJECT RBORIST PRIOR rl fill,,,Iii om.�1�'4111a�.7m190N6�.1ili irelP��lltfi�1 i� TO WORKING BENEATH PROTECTED TREE DRIPUNES. I I I %/I � -1 ' 32270. •T�,t '.\ 2. PROTECTION FENCING. ALL TREES TO BE RETAINED ( ss �' •V'I.' .Il►�� `;` "'rlitWl� -1-.•-.�. J-r- :;:. 1 SHALL BE PROTECTED BY 5-FOOT TALL METAL j r;i': -'I 5D�- \ FENCING UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE t1' I SO 32385... 1 ):' 1 S0 '•.�i1� 5 I •.. I._ f- I............. I 1 r•!•,'� 32387 \7::, I CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE. PROTECTION FENCING r•. W cf t�937� .G 5r_• I f t'' ••-...�.....-.• i r 1 \ SHALL BE SECURED TO STEEL POSTS PLACED NO 'r^IY/ 1cn - - - - - - `�'�r/-� __ ..s J I_ , ! _ - t-�_'_"._...._.... � - ��.!~� 'r• T ISL 1 FURTHER THAN 8-FEET APART AND SHALL BE W ' 31563 31582 �� r----- -.. A \ INSTALLED AT THE EDGE THE TPZ. -- � 1 T �(�-_ ENCRDACHMENr vtE 3. PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE. THE PROJECT a _ • �� ,� �+ - COORgNATE MITH ,,' . .�• ..-- � ._.- PRD.ECT ARBORIST W ii ti, I,+ 11 •1 r- �'-��9 •.•. 1 I (PRIOR m An usnNG `) \1 ARBORIST SHALL BE ON SITE TO DISCUSS METHODSLi., )' i ^ I 1_=\ T •...... I / OnoH OF TREE REMOVAL AND TREE PROTECTION PRIOR TO I I � ` ANY CONSTRUCTION. I i. , ,„____ a x o x o ''�-�_' / / Oma; , 4. :DEREUNING. THE PROJECT ARBORIST CANHELPPR 1j ^ r^ m -- -- / i NTIFY IF AND NMERE PRUNING IS NECESSARY• i9 � NCE TREES PLANNED FOR REMOVAL HAVE BEENi+ . - ` 1 ' MOVED AND THE SITE IS STAKED AND PREPARED Li ��.7.--;,--'. - / 777 +� / I FOR CONSTRUCTION. PRUNING SHALL BE PERFORMED .1 � -.: .....„.-.21;; � I BY A QUALIFIED TREE SERVICE. 31369 !OAT - � . '' } - a a / 5. TREE PROTECTION ZONE MAINTENANCE. THE a t • Y • r a a a EQUIPMENT EXCEPT ^+i_ � y C y I • � y- \ i L PROTECTION FENCING SHALL NOT BE MOVED, n . \ � '-- �- �, / a a Y I REMOVED, OR ENTERED BY EQU �P, S� O�1 n �`� j: r r Y a • �` y a + I l l +� I UNDER DIRECTION OF THE PROJECT ARBORIST. c qt.), rq S-•.l` _ ♦ a + `\ 25'WETLAND BUFFER • i r Z ��f 1010 {-� T.,. /'-•. Y:a a,w a,.a a / 6. STORAGE OF MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT. THE ��W oI��I►-I. ~_ 6+ -. 32243 ♦ • • a `/ + + • ♦ a• 1�. �_� S, • ISI iso +, • . a a�4. ♦ a _• ' '', V I EQUIPMENT WITHINL THE TPZ.ORE MATERIALS OR a Y.`� o v aP 31292 I:: + I4 = ni ��,� ``` I 7. EXCAVATION. EXCAVATION BENEATH PROTECTED v �o 016. , !! i � �`� I • Y a a a Y TREE DRIPUNES SHALL E AVOIDEDIF J gyp,-- II 1'. 32242 1I , ,:, 1 I Y • a a a a a a +• + + + + ♦ r ♦ I _ ; ` I ALTERNATIVES ARE AVAILABLE.IF EXCAVATION IS • • o UNAVOIDABLE, THE PRO.ECE ARBORIST SHALL \S ; IIll 1'0 9 1 Y - �' r ` i / a a a •a •aaa I �M EVALUATE THE PROPosm EXCAVATION TO *Esc piA11NG4 AaE NE marwn a _-- -- i-- - / I ` \ MES' 'Cd91tf•NA INC YCI ANO O1 I. I, ,, r •� 1 ,,,,1`.-1....i."1,41,,,32'2;;•••••e :y • ♦ + a ♦ + +` __r_-�-- '+ DETERMINE METHODS TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO .rtE NOT ro eE acwroouEco iN wr `" l1 • I�.7 -� ��'; = r� Y Y a a a a a ;--'- I- a♦+-+ -- ' I YAINEA ElCEPT AM THE MIRfEN I 3�6, at ` 11 TREES ALL CONSTRUCTION BENEATH THE DRIPLINE ,0,,5�a,� R ,` t ( al�� III ' IIIIII 32236=rj �� a♦ a a a a t-' / / OF PROTECTED TREES SHALL BE UNDER THE' '1 -_ � •• a a y + + y Y a a a r Y a + a `�• ON-SITE TECHNICAL SUPERVISION OF THE PROJECTzz ..�I I 1 Sj "._ - �� i a ♦ I• a a \--. \ o a WmInb• I r 'a4 32236 : a aaa Y ♦ a rYa + , ARBORIST. { T ) �� • vj, ENCROACHMENT AREA a a a a y,<r'+ + y a ` I8. LANDSCAPING.FOLLOIMNG CONSTRUCTION AND 31 " ♦ 1� •/',,/ 4 (',�/1h'II ' *v..• f.. 39 COORDINATE WITH y ~a a a a ,4 a a a a a a a r Y a Y a Y a a Y a a a / 363 { `�*$ y \`� WHERE LANDSCAPING IS DESIRED,APPLY = x a;:.a a��N�p ��9 32233 III 11 t PRIOR TO ARBORIST a Y • i a a a a a a a a • a i s ^r. •• .__-_ _ �1i�d I PRIOR AD,lU5T1NG r, , a a a a i a Y Y Y Y a I a a a Y a a Y . t .•_t.• ( �`� (, I Ir'+,110I 1 '' - '.4 • ;TREE PROTEcnoN a a Y • Y a I-- APPROXIMATELY 3-INCHES OF MULCH BENEATH THE M - ., .r} A - e f -•47 Wr-h11'.11 �.71�� a ,a FENCING. y a y y ,, ,K + • Y a ♦ DRIPUNE OF PROTECTED TREES,BUT NOT DIRECTLY i 1 4\171''T' r /'• Y - + a a a r y Y Y I Y ' Y I a a a Y + +a a a Y Y a • J AGAINST TREEYTRUNKS.SHRUBS AND GROUND 3131{4 i., ,.1 `/ ' 'r.1•1(1 I a y', a' y a a a + + `F. .I \ 1I II `.. 3223iv +a y a ,'�♦ ja`, a a a a a a a a T a COVERS MAY BE PLANTED WITHIN TREE PROTECTION i. + AREAS.IF IRRIGATION IS USED, USE DRIP IRRIGATION d` ,,?a' s?'�:t®1�+1Ei661RrY�nV601�+ `�{[ti X11 a , ` a a I ' a a a ♦ Y a Y \ I TREESONLY. THE DRIPUNES OF PROTECTED .'�%�l Il '` ', 31013_ I 91 , �. • ` 1(I 11II I + t,•++y1+ y''�a r r a•1-,a Y a•,;a a s+�a a a 1'a,A a Y Y Y a a a ♦a a s +a Y y a +Y a a+-r a s �-�, �. -+. '.\,-. & i6.5''' 1'4' a W a + WETLANDSa a a Y +','•. C J 31365 ,y.. 1; e ; • I`. ?I 1• + a 1a y a,'•,y y y 'W Y II a a,\+ Y . a a +) a a a a •a a • a a a + •� I\ 9. TREE PROTECTION INSPECTION.THE PROJECT 6 T':• - l II I $t __ - I�1��1III W.a i ♦`1 a a'w a Y a a 4 y+ ''+ +;a+ ♦ I Y a . a , a Y a .I . a a a + + • \; S AR80RIST SHALL INSPECT AND VERIFY THE a :+R�;31366 1 0 ♦ a a Y ♦ .1+a a 6 a a a ♦ a a • LOCATION OF PROTECTION MEASURES PRIOR TO E y a': a a TF�+I#CwT : • Y• • • + LA -1�.[ `` \ a 'a +:\ a :a i; a a y \ U o(.:n,'31367 I> I w ` ` y r �7 Y I ♦ a a a a a a Ja . a I a , .� CONSTRUCTION.MONITOR TREE PROTECTION rn "44.t . • • • I338' ` I ` ',a y �a `,•y a Y''•` JJ-�'tlll 'I y _ a a a .. a a a a a Y a a a •_ . WRITTENEREPORTS TO THE CITY DURING PERIODS OF E '- .3'3� 8' 1 7 1 I COI • a' a •':a • a a +a" ` +♦+ ti a+ •a` . •r •a Y a • a a • a a a a a a t y I \ ,,, ¢� ACTIVE CONSTRUCnoN. 4 31386 �, W + Y: a y a y y,r a • ♦ a a a a a a a a ♦ a a a\a + " -- 10.FINAL REPORT.AFTER THE PROJECT HAS BEEN �S I Y: a , a i a a ♦ I + a a a 'L Y a a yl // '�`r. r- A ,I -- -- 7 !t 1•. t .. ; .a y ♦+ a W a a' a a ......... . .. Y a i Y Y AC F J J > , I': + l a a y:r♦ a . a ,a ,a ♦ a l a a I+a a r r a + a` a w a Y a 1E1 A FINAL REPORT THAT DESCRIBES THE MEASURES cc LI' I y } COMPLETED,THE PROJECT ARBORIST SHALL PROVIDE t` y Y Y aaaa • r . aYa • �II r�i • 1 1 �, I ``` I t a'++ I a y a i aI' , + + + + •• I. a . a i r Y " NEEDED TO MAINTAIN AND PROTECT THE REMAINING O1 b 5 .`�..i-1�bt389 I 1•' ,+ I '• ' 1 'Y+,, l •a +y I a b a `•r; y +a a a a a a a y a a r a Y a a y a .. r TREES. o _ �'' / l :a :'a ,a + C) r.27 Oa n W - Nil , (-•, ,��r��. I /```� x y♦ d a +: ♦ a a a s r a a Y Y a a r • + ♦ a Z ^ 1 : - ♦ a a a a • a a a i ,, y Y a a _ a r Y Y ...-.. N N •�.��r/I I I • Y L a L N O O /y, �� 1 /�`'. 32236 .� i +x a u / ,� , r.r.• . r I + • Y a a a a a a a + { - a • r r Y a a 'r > $ rG- . -_ y' + a L a a a v a•a ♦ , + • a a a + + a Y .� N O le! '- R--�� 32234 _✓ +i ,v • Y a; a MW �, y a i s r a a Y a ♦ a a a +•%.. / a + r y a y a a Y Y a + SHEET 1 11{{ r a Z ' \ • �' ,,, a:'•+ •la •a:w• y:•a •a ♦ ,♦ a `y a a s a a a a • i. a a a ♦ Y a a Ia . ...a a + a s �, a r +--- W .0 ✓: ; w yr y: y yia v a, + I �'a Q . _�__ • M a 'a f y Y ,a a a a a g . , ` : • • a + • a; + • a', x,�y R-•r-7i.�-Y'x +• a a a + a a a • a a Y LS 1I, I xy 1 r 5tie:�}, _ - -- - - I• +, ♦: +r a •i a s to a a a, a a . a a a a a r �I % a%Y a a • a y Y • --- JOB NO. �m 1a • a. +: Y + y r Y •t 1 -.'"...e7-.. I , ' , a a a ♦`, a , a I-. I� . 1;.I 1306-006 Attachment E: Tree Canopy Site Plan . J 7 ;,.', ,..,j W s 31877 f' ` 31878_ - - -- -- -- -- -jiy—/r.-61;— -- i c5 iN _ __ _ _ //_,, 1 4 �z Co S o 5900 TAX w�� by lanrlinc eo l I 1 !Ivo. i •iP.° r / 4t, • I r- I III I III 11 I III �,:II ) I�,� 31e28 -Date: a • o • I I I I,' 38 I I 37 36 I 35 i ,-1-ill„ >ate: 1 1 . .. .- 40 39 •�,�I aI � z w r III I I I I III III ��• 31827 40' 0 2a' 40 80 Ez - I I _I- - L .it initials: . N � W w p, 5265 Ii 3-rJ , I SCALE: 1INCH = 40 FEETui�Il illtel3�®R/�!'� �lV� iF7�,ld3�11r�3��i��iiMlf�®6:�_ 0tAP J1 . / E- • v0.N \ � 114-.4 �IJ7111=1_6Y,al1.1Ilttl�e9ii_C itragflaNirat -, 'i t Cl)\ \ - ' r_#7 �_#6 �y �-- /4 ` ; , 41e 1� 31826 PLANTED TREE LEGEND 1.5' CALIPER v`.F-1 t3 g]W r, /9110" 1 /11' i/12 1 /13 /14 {�15� ► Iz, �o TAX l^'`, wz z -no laP�iS1yW)Wili9 LTAIIi P'•1,,jib•NKAII,Mt/�lil:'1>•Il[�)H>!��il�� 4Z` D 6400 r 1 O W o d \, UlFO ` -' yt�/ r • — • w�\ Al• �rl l 31620_ KATSURA /CERCIDIPHYLLUS JAPONICUM 0CJ °1 _-\�- `.:. /• _ V..- v �, '� , '1 "�CC Y" J (DIAMETER SPREAD 40') ',mom, z � � �• N ICD. x� ✓ .�� w 0.;g T _ 7 I 1 34' rte, �� .i.... 29 • I ( 30 rjl `31 I I 32‘,„I I -- _ I _ 1 1 I LI-1 I I I `, I v� ' OREGON WHITE OAK/QUERCUS GARRYANA F 8 1 I----- I I i 33 lill'11 „' 31800 X ` J (DIAMETER SPREAD 50') W°° \O\ ��7 _—' L� — , �ji�'I - �r,� 31700 0 lik,* f I 1 s IP, 11� -,� —,;(,)��.n 'fir ,.`t �,,,,,i,,, ►y ---_ -�-- -- -- --I ASTERN REREAD CERCIS CANADENSIS -�- 1,I— ' ; 23 ,. �� I�l< . ��— .- �`,` O.J (DIAMETER SPREAD 25) —28 27 1 l,, [ 24 - -�: -1 - I \ ...,,,,,,,,,,,\,,,,t:```,`:t ZI _ .�1` � .'_•, 1- ,, 1, ,•, ` \ TREE PROTECTIVE FENCING(AT DRIP LINE) Q x o l I ' Ir --i,, /�r -- _1��'�_ '`, I,`,I:It 1 i \ 0OREGON ASH/FRAXINUS LATIFOUA, d a I 1 �`\ �� q i r1 ` 1 ''`,`t',`',1 4 QTY, 2GAL CONTAINER ~ i1iA i lla a, lr . ab e . 5 -.-' -•1 `` ` 1_:''`,'','','I'` J ASCARA/RHAMNUS PURSHIANA, 0' 11' �i,�11;as;llOi'��Irr�a'�!/�1/ i.��w�. di.. 20 �4.. l 1 '1', ,'1 j /25 )®/+Ei�l6N1)lLZ4 i, [M_�i0Niti:YIM;I00i[/►',I/1V1r41-We 1_I_L�'�' ,t, %-}}'' l� 1 , 1 \,,s,,:„..,,,,, \ 4 QTY, 2GAL CONTAINER nr O >- .�� /--� 2 l� -A — - 34 �'4 I ' ' `‘‘0,‘‘.....'‘'`,',':, I BITTER CHERRY PRUNUS EMARGINATA, '/�%11111 /24. ••,20,—,‘”X19 /18/' �':.� 51' ;, , O �� 29 i --TYY' J 3 OTY, 2GAL CONTAINER N < d v��i1:41�22Aw* ►:1aEi5ip'wt►:Oa`'L'0pa6_` mmi r►?` to ,,,n,,,,,,,,,‘5'•• ( �,_`l'�Sil ilA� lTi�ll�a\�_��11•\111iM►:logi�\rli<i�r�Mrm�wl ,< , •, I V 'I' W HANSEN LN — • ��y- seg. ► ► ► -1 - - ----7:_. . .-_-_-1,:-' l '39• I1 ': \ TREE PLANTING NATES m r'I', '' ice'= `.•'L•%r: Ili: _1 1 ..-./ ,://f ..---).H,;',‘,,, `' /'�}I// +i, � - _ 1 ' ,": 1.NEW TREES THAT ARE PLANTED TO MEET THE EFFECTIVE / I `,','•, \ CANOPY REQUIREMENTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE I , , 31583 31582 I 1 '�` r'f _C _ --16 ��t-.17 18- 19=•=-'I-f _, /,' ; ' . . ; i APPLICABLE STANDARDS IN THE TIGARD URBAN FORESTRY t 1 1 ,f x t . 14'Ali�/ 15- -'_"-may; I i ,1�', - 44= 1 t' -J MANUAL.THEY SHALL BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE I: J ". 7- r /` AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE(ANSI) _: — - ,--‘,9. a a x oo /.� �• � ��/`�+�., � T i ! — • J - 1 • ; i ADdITIONAL SOTANDARDS ADOPTEID BOY THE OREGON • • J <oa /141,..! r" _ _-- � "F' _ -- ! 1 I LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS BOARD.NURSERY STOCK SHALL I ' , - TRACT F _ ----'--------..______-:t�sa= -;5---' --- -- _ '- '' ,' ' - MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION • I,-�'Cj1 I I I , ,11 1 __ .� _ - — -- I OF NURSERYMEN FOR NURSERY STOCK(ANSI Z60.1)FOR —"----.21----- _--- • ' / GRADE NO.1 OR BETTER.DOUBLE STAKE TREES IF NEEDED FOR 313��', i r ; STABILITY DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. 1 1 2.ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE C\ �d -- I— _ r� ; MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS WHEN A STREET TREE IS W 1....', "�� `l I r i i�9i /��'1r+'��Z_� �" � I PLANTED WITHIN S'OF ANY HARD SURFACE,PAVING,OR i o 9 �- /41 '4141,11aI F, /47 J ►II j ; ; + UTILITY BOX. n o o t;o I , I I,' �� I `,� J,....6 I rift& ��, ` ;v WI-,,,r- ;moo !�•• I 1' `11/1 I,` �' — l' '�oiQ` f `\ I 3.IF NEEDED,IRRIGATION TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY THE ('� O, g 2 ��'1� 1 ■ ' — T Illhl I +a 7--7.„.____., � 1 I I LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. m +;J�J 10 I I '' 9 ` et rR. 1111 I1t �r^1 1 • t (TRACT -A 1 I I ‘, +✓1 1 31 `'1 • '1 ; 1 'HESE OPAMNGS ARE THE PPq{NTf OF a ! , I - ..-• _•__ 1 , rIGTE NCMLIITCID(NCOANO`143i's I I I ' j! 114 ,;9111- 49 �►, 5 J', I,MORGAN HOLEN,ATTEST THAT THIS TREE uu«m EaCEPT�TM NE nrtrtN ` ;ilk �rl ^, !.- , , r I I, PEAYSSION Of NI 1 11J1' �� g, I��i 1 �I fir ; , CANOPY SITE PLAN MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS R, `'r '-, I 1 I 44,m t4� ' ,1 I 1',GI _--------% i ' ; , Of SECTION 10,PART 2,OF THE qTY OF z z S•• #50�� - r ' '1 TIGARD URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL. n . m Ilfl- 31363 •1^�:.44,.._ 4,11..'#44.•�l��:��9�' , 1 ��, 32236 r;„ , \ ! x x m ,-' :7•;i"L --� 1 ``, !1 1 _ 11111 ' ', ,r r • ( , --,`,`, .1 — 111 117 I %.'1, TRACT'AI ` — ' ` J I ,-131364 ', , , , '- -,iciummiesPma'it�� 'M `, ,1 32237 , �1 r i��bA�cjo� % (r , �`� •51 I ' 3 I • \,` 'I MORGAN HOLES B. 31363 1 ` '' `` ,', I `i`. ISA BOARD CERTIFIED MASTER ARBORIST,PN 61458 z #59 ,^�1 J `I ' j7 y�� ` i. ', '' I • \\ ISA TREE RISK ASSESSMENT QUALIFIED F 31366 ',tl�) 11 G, I ,■ _ tl `` `, ' `, ', DATE:JANUARY 18,2018 i 3;367 ;�11 , #52 y� _ kk, ; , , , TRACT I - �,. . ,,L,,,,, 1 I 300,,,tit 11338_-il�� I 1' • , 1 I,', 7 . r Pb , ,` I,` 2 I 1 31365 ,1�,' 8 , 1I �\ .J , _ ._ ' ■55 ' ' TRACT R\\ fat , \:,` __:•______J) r..• 'E' o °a,36i�.��4i —•:,-1,1 L, v! #53 n s I� ` T Z O 8 'gin (` iG — T— - �4 `• — —— SHEET o J r', ``4 � 1 1 , Q • 5116.. x1----a---- -- `r- -- • ' ' `` :I`, ', ', ` 1 JOB NO. =CO i `, I 1306-006 In