BUTLER TERRACE SUBDIVISION (2) 9- 11-SI.
,ems "b . (�
I�
CITY Or- TIFAR® No. 16483
12755 S W ASN (?!e >-6
\ P O BOX 23397 ate
TIGARD,oR 97223 `
�t7
Name
Address
Lot Block/Map SubdivisionlAddreas
1
Permit N's Bldg Plumb Cash Check
Sewer Other Other Rec. By /
Acct. No.
Description Amount
10-432 Building Permit Fees
10-431600 Plumbing Permit Fees
10-431.601 Mechanical Permit Fees
10-230-501 State Bldg. Tax
10-433 Plans Check Fee
30 443 Sewer Connection
30-444 Sewer Inspection
51 448 Street Syst. bev. Charge
52449.610 Parks I Syst. Dev. Charge
x2.449-620 Parks It Syst. Dev. Charge
31-450 Storm Drainage Syst. Dev Charge
10-430 Business Tax
10.434 Alarm Permit
10-227 Bail
10-455- Fines - Trafflc1Wsd1Parking
10.230- CPTA Traffic/MisdlVic. Asst.
10-456 Indigent Defense
30.122-401 Sewer Sevvice/USA
30-122.402 Sewer ServicelCity 30%
30-123 Sewer Sevice/Cit Malnt.
34125 Unmatched
31.124 Storm Drainage
44475 Bancroft Prin. Pymt.
40.471 Bancroft Int. Pymt.
a(t► I
M
PLEASE 1AKE 1HIS TO THE CASHIER_ FAIL A Rt:C1.IP1
MAMF .- ` �e int _ DATE:
E.'• �v��Gr 'Teri�c-e. S�►.r• --- �.- _.. __._..___ ._
--� _ AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION .
_ACCT -----
10--220 _— Refundable Performance Bond Deposit f.
LO-435
511n Permits ------- HOP-------TU --
o�
Public Sewer Plan Check/Inspection fee
10-436 _ Public Stora Plan Check/Inspectionea
10-436 - - Public Improvement Fee S /�S40•
10-436 _ Street Opening Permit s
10-440 Subdivision Applications:
-- -- ---— S- MLP ---- ------ --- s
10--441 Zoning Applications :
ZC CPA ZOA PO Misc
SCE CU SLP V S
21 -442- -- Street Light Fee _-- _ -- _ f_ 2Z(o• 6
10 451 Document Sales
ENrg. Planning
10-451 Street and Traffic Signs
10-•451 _ Land Use Actions/Fees: SDR f_...
TOM.
(1045P)
September S, 1986
CMCW TWARD
Mr. Samuel A. Gotter III OQ��N
1110 SW Gentlev66ds Drive
Tigard OR 91224 25 V!M d Service
1961-1986
Re: butler Terrace Subdivision
Dear Mr. Gotter:
Enclosed, please find the Compliance Agreement and Perfo!mane<, Bond
for said project. After signature thereof by the princLpal(s) and no( ,ti \
and. in the case of the bond fora, by the surety, please return both
documents for final processing. After City execution and acknowledgn%•nt ,
copy will be transmitted to you, for your file, by the City Recorder .
Subsequently. thereafter, the approved public improvement constructioie pl.tnM
can be issued upon receipt of a check, in favor of the City of Tigard, Oregon,
in the sum of $ 2,258.08 ; being the said agreement (therein eetiete•Ji
deposit/fee(a).
Yours truly, 2
ohn S. Hagma
Engineering Technician
JSll:pjr
131?5 SW Hail Blvd.,P.O Boot 23397.Tigard.Orogm 97M (503)639-4171 -
SU90IYISIOt6 CDIVA IAPNJ AGRI[mi.Nl
THIS AGREEMENT slated the day of
( between the CITY d' rr(;ARD, a eatnLr.ipislity of St,kt.P of Ohereinafter
regc►n,
ermed
tthe
and Samuel l_. (;cit t er I I I
hereinafter termed "P,rtitioner".
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, Petitioner has applied to tle City for arprovail f(►r filirq in
Washington County, a subdivision plat known as Mitler 'Cerrace
11 , Township 2 South. Range 1 West
Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon; and
WHEREAS, the City has adoptiod tho Standard Speciftcations for Public Worts
Construction by Oregon Chapter APWA, for street, stormy drain, stricture and
related work, and Unified Sewerage agency Standards and Specifications, for
sanitary sewer construction, prepared by profPssional engineers for
subdivision public improvement development; rnd
WHEREAS, the public improvements to be constructed in Petitioner' s
development are incomplete, and Petitioner has nonetheless requested the City
to permit progressive occupancy and use of property in thie subdivision, and
the parties desire hereby to protect the public interest generally and
prospeqective purchasers of lots in said subdivision by 'legally enforceable
assurances that public improvements will be installed as ruired and
completed within the time hereinafter set forth
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the
covenants and agreements to be kept and performed by the Petitioner and its
sureties, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLUA:
(1 ) Petitioner shall proceed with development, with the inters. and
purpose to complete all public improvements except sidewalks and street tree-j
of said subdivision not later than two (2) years from the date of this
agreement, and Petitioner agrees to comply with all subdivision standards as
set forth in the City's Subdivision Ordinance and the standard specifications
of the City of Tigard, to comply with all terms and provisions specified
thereinregard this improvement by the Concil and Planning Gowission of the
City of Tigard, Oregon, or as may be specified by the Community Development
Department and to use only such material and to follow such designs as xray by
required by or approved by said Department. Petitioner shall piovtde
certification of installation conformance and one as--built mylar, both stamped
by a regist►►red civil engineer , to the r►tv prior to City inspection of
petitioners improvement work for City ( nnd►tional and final arc apt on, v
consideration
(2) To assure compliance with the Cit,"s requirements and the prrv1:1, n-
hereof. Petitioner will tender. on requeAt , to the City ; surety bond appi . A
by the City, with liability in the amount of $ 5011800.00 or in an am►niliit
equal to the cost of incomplete performance work plus the normally require+
maintenance amount prior to recording of the subdivision plat .
(3) In the event ~that Petitioner shall fail., neglect or refuse to proceed
with the work in an orderly and progressive manner to assure completion wit'-tin
the t itne limits, uporl ten (10) day+t notice by the City to Petitionot anct
Petitioner's sureties, and sucrt default and failure tc proceed continuing
thereafter, the City may at its option proceed to have t'►e work competed and
chargv the costs hereof against Petitioner a-v3 Petitioner' s Sureties and in
the event sane be not paid, to bring an action on the laic; bond to recn1tp► the
amount thereof In the event such acticn be brought, Pet•ttionur .wnd
Petitioner's Sureties promise and agrer to pay, in addition to the 4m ,unts
accruing ani a.11owab'e, such sunt a•, the court shall adjudyi- reasonable as
attorney' s fees and costs incurred by the City, both in t.h(r Trial Cot.rt and
Appellate Court., if any, or the City may, at its option, bring procoedirvpk to
enforce against. the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's ',uroties soerific
performance of the contract and i.ompliance with the subdivision stanclards and
orclinances of the City of Tigard, and in such event., in like mtinner, the Pity
shall be entitled to recover such sum as the court shall adjuAgo ro,asnnablo ,its
and for the City's attorney's fees and costs, both in Iht- Trial t:nu► t +itd
Appellate Court, if any
(A) Petitioner, concurrent with the execution hereof, shall deposit with
the► City an amount estimated to equal polo and luminar maintenance fops, for
st-eet lighting facilities within the subdivision, according to Port ldnd
Cenoral Electric Schedule #91, Option "B" , together with a further sum equal
to the estimated cost of providing electrical energy to energize the street
lighting facilities for a period of two (2) years from the, date of initial
energizing of said lights Said amount being s. 226.08
(5) The City agrees to make and provide periodic and final insppctions
which in the City' s interest are desirable to assure compliance herewith III
consideration whereof the Petitioner shall pay prescribed inspections fop, M
(6) the City agrees to install street identification and trafftt , itin�
within said subdivision, ir consideration of payment in the amount of
s n/a
(7) At such time as all public improvompnts oxcept sidewalks and ,tit-t•1
trees within the subdivision have been completed in accordance with the. City ' s
requirements, Petitioner shall submit a "certificate of installation
conformance" to the City to notify the City of readiness for conditi,,nal
acceptance inspection and, then, upon notification by the Department of
Community Development that the requirements of the City have been wept , the
Petitioner ,ill submit to the City a food and sufficient guarantee bond if nut
already provided with the performance bond, form approved by the t.1ty to
provide for correctior of any incomplete work or any defective whet, i,►
maintenance becoming apparent or arising within one (1) year after condit
acceptance of the public improvements by the City
(9) Upon receipt of certification from the DQpartmc-nt of Community
Development that all requirement-a have boon met, and a One Year Gui+r,antoo
nond, the City Council agrees to conditionally ac( opl the public improvement
subject to the requirement of complet.ion of all work and cor►,,ctiorl of
deficiencies and maintenance for a period of one year,
(9) That in addition to or supplementary of the requirements tit,
City' s Subdivision Ordir+anr.o and the provisions hereof, Petitiotior bIttd+
iIt.spIf to conform to the followirxl rpquI--oments, schuduI Irtq and Iimitwt i11i„
*Project Fee S 1_54U_00
Sewer rep S 452_00
7
MMMMoomoomp
a
(a) None of the lots of Pat:itionpr' s subdivision ay dwi( rikwd may he
occupied for residential purpose!% until an c cufancy permit is issuod under
authority of the City a.:-t no occupancy pc,-mit shall be i-sued prior to
conditional acceptance of the subdivision and to the time that the sidewalk
paralleling the stree, for each cle-veloped lcat proposed to ba occupied, is
installed as a part of ter dev,rlopment; provided that all sidewalks as
required by tha plans and subdivision rode shall be installed i:hroughout said
suldivision not latei than three (?) years 'roar the date of tt is Subdivision
Compiiance Agreement
(b) All ianascaping treses on that portion of each lcit betweer the
public sidewalks and the curb (parking area), if requires, shall be planted in
place prior to final inspection and Lisuance of ciccupanci permit for each such
lot: in the subdivision. Provided ,:het fins' irspecetion and alPlie.ation for
occupancy permit occurs within any c,iliRndar month from October tc April of Ariv
year, st—h plantings may be deferred until othp noxt following growing gea% cn
In any event. all requirc-d lanio;f mping and tr -es ;.n a,11 or-pas sh, 11 bc- plmri- vd
and in plarc, within the entire sukxlivision within tired (3) years from iii,
data of this subdivision improvement om'Iract .
(c) After corw1it conal City acceptau_e of the public improvement r,
the Petitioner agrees to place an ;rsph.altic concrete overlay )n all ►t,.+c1 -
within the development; plat Pment schv.duling t be approvac by tho City
(d) Compliance with all terms and provisions specified theretofor
said suMlivision dc.,-.lopment by the Council and the Planning Commission of lhV
City of Tigard, Oregon, in regard to variances allowed from the subdivision
ordinance, conditions specified by the zone use classificati.on and, also. n,
the approved plat(s) and plan(s)
(e) Petitioner agrees to correct any defective work arid to porform
any maintenance, upon notification by the City, arising during the guarantee
period as hereinabove set forth.
( 10) At such time as all public improvements have been completed in
accordance with the City's requirements, Petitioner shill notify the City of
readiness for final inspection and upon cer'tificatio,) by the Department of
Community Development that all raquirements of the ,ity have been mkt , the
Council agrees to accept said improvements for operation and maintenance
responsibility, and release the Petitioner' s guarantee band
(11) rhe parties hereto hereby adopt the form of performance bond, copy
whereof is hereto attached and by reference rtusdP a part hereof, and Petit.iona►
agrees to cause to have said bond executed and filed with the City
concurrently with the execution of this agreement at or p► for Iii the t unit this
agrpempnt is executed on behalf of the City . Petitioner further agrees it,
maintain said bond in full force and effect until otherwise authorifad by the
City in writinq
( 19) The specific requirements of Paragraph 9 hereof shall far .ell
purposes by included as a part of the obligation secured by the afores,atd
performance bond and the City shall by entitled to recourse thereto ir, ItIv
evenl of default on the part of the Petitioner with r espac t to any requ i comer-
thereof
3
IN W1INISS WHEREOF , Petitioner acting by and through it.s duly authorized
►dersigned officers pursuant to resolution of its board of Directors has
caused this agreement to be executed, and the City act irK3 pursuant t.o motion
of its Council adopted at a meeting thereof duly and regularly held on
the day of 1 19 has caused this
agreement to be executed by its Mayor and Recorder.
Samuel A. Gotter III
Hy —
THE C 1 i Y Of 1 I LARD, ORt GON
Mayor
Recorder_ _
(Attach Notary W knowledgement hereto)
Return signed copy to Samuel A. Cotter III
1110 SN Gentlewoods Dri .,e
ILS&Wd OR 91224
i
(00ius)
f
i
r
Subdivision pERfORMANCF BOND
Bond Pie.
KNOW All MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that ANO( Samu,al A. GnU&r 1,17
as
Principal, and a
corporation duly authorized to conduct a general surety bt.'siness in tha State
of Oregon, as Surety, are jointly and severally held bound unto tie City of
Tigard, Orogon, a municipality of the State of Oregon, hereinafter called the
Obligee, in the sum of S 50.800 , lawful money of the United States of
America, for the payment of which w,.?, as Principal, and as Surety, jointly ,and
severally bind ourselves, our successors and assigns firmly by these present
THE CONDITIONS OF THIS BOND AND 001IGAIION IS SUCH, that the P► inc ►pals
are constructing and platting asubdivie_iorz je[� ae Butl, Terrace_._ .
located in the City of Tigard, Oregon, and have (in tarod into
a Subdivision Complian,:c Agreement with respect to tknot,IV
development and improvement thereuf, a copy of vaid Agreement is stlachod
hereto, and by reference made a part h,?reof; and
NOW, THEREFORE, if the Principal herein shall faithfully and t my observe
and comply with all terms of the Agreement and shall well and truly perform
all matters and things undertaken to 5e performed under said Ayroement and
under all ordinances, regulations and conditions of the Obligee applicable to
said development and improvcrment, and shall promptly make payments to all
persons supplying labor or material for any of the work proyAed b; s.+id
agreement, and shall not permit any lien or claim to be filed or iarosocutianed
against the Obligee, then this obligation shall be void, ctherw`.se to remain
in full force and effect
In the event of suit or action be filed by the Obligee hereunder tc
enforce said contract or to recover under t.-Nv. terms of this bond, in additiun
to all other rights and remedies hereunder , the City, in the event it shall
prevail , shall be entitled to recover such sums as the Court may adjudge
reasonable as and for attorney's fees
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have cau'ied this bund to be
executed this day of 19.86
Samuel A. Gotten III
Principal
By
By (seal -- — -- -- -- _ U
(A trop copy of the Power of Attorney
must be stlachoW to the original of Surety
thio bond )
Aitornoy in Fact
(0921P) 1 OT
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FEE \\COMPUTATION SHEII
Project. Title: %,Mev _C�Irt-zlcc ` �bd��. Imprv. pe:
Computed By: _ — Date:
1 PROJECT PERMIT FEE (T M.0 18. 164. 150)
A. Improvement cost estimate, r
less sanitary sewer. . . .$ 362 .50C
("AIL; . . ..–r.+
B 0 04 x s -36, 50C� `� _ Ito
(Adjusted Cost)
2 . SANITARY SEWER MAIN, PLAN CFcf_CK AND INSPECTION FEE (Ord, No 85-02)
A Contract surcharge applicable yes,
no
(agreement name) �D
9 Sewer Improvement cost estimate f /20300.
(sewer est . )
(sewer estimate) (fee)
Lor] $100 00 min. , whichever is greater _ �'9
3 STREETLIGHT FEE (T.M.C. 18. 164. 130 (x) L 3 08.010)
A. P.G.E. Schedule No. - C_�)'L_, Option No.
Type of Lamp AZ/=7-S, ,. + .w'watts ---;
Type of Pole �G. Height �!
B. $ 4, 4 1 M z = $ —4_. _/mo
(monthly rate) (no of lights)
(monthly rite) (no of polas) o E
$_�. h+ + C'�. ?�' x 74 months
(subtotal lights) (Subtotal poles)
4. 'TRAFFIC–PEDESTRIAN SIGN FEE (T.M C. 18 164 030(u) .
A. Stop @ $ $
(number) (each) (subtotal )
B. St Name:
C,. Combo: @ $ $
D No Park incl @ $ $
$
Sign(s) Total
5 GRAND 1O1At (FFF 'S DUI )
Roraipt No �(0'4s3 nate Paid CT I5/IF& , w
0920P
vavoo •�, �'b
a"Al <A,:340-\3r\aQ,
�r TECHNICAL
ENGINEERING
e CORPORATION
8835 S.W. CANYON LANE SUITE 405
PORTLAND, OREGON 07225 15031 287 - 3721
September 2, 1986
BUTLER TERRVE
Engineer's Es`imate
1. Street Construction i..c.�b ova���.,> $ 25,000.00
2. Sanitary sewer Construction 12,300.00
3. Water System 4,100.00
4. Sidewalks +6@w6h ew}y) 'j.x 1 ,300.00
5. A.C. Pathway 1 ,500.00 I
6. Street Lights (2) 1 ,400.00
7. Utility trenching ( P.o,L. , r,.T.E., C.T.V.) 1.000.00
ff -PIT
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST >> ;
ENOIhE1�RINd
PLANNING SURVEYING
I r
U.S.A. - D.E.-Q. COPX
APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCT,ON
ISSUED BY DATE
(CITY OF TIGAr?f)
•
lot
'on DEV LP SE RV DEP'' BY uA'E _-- --
OPERATIONS DEPT 6r DATE
CJTY ENGINEER BY DATE
P G E.CO. By DATE
TEL CO By DATF
STORE R CABs E CO B DA TF
APPROVED
UNIFI SEW E- NV NAT c',AS CO Br DAT,E
BY
g. 0 - e6 aST BY ;a _
LI IF SEW 44GENCY BY DATE
J
•
C1 Y OF TI6A M
OREGON
„ �. c' \,5 veon o7 Service
JQ� k. �Sl 191 1986
R E: ,BUTL EJP TZ k-RAV C�
Dear 7-Q,�
Attached please find owe copy(s) of a public improvement plan Said plan
needs to be circulated through the below noted agpncips for rev►pw
acknowledgement and, subsequently, returners to this office
Very truly,
/JohZnS Nagma
Engineering Technician
• (JS& sb45)
/ PGE Company /- Northwest Natural Gas Co.
14655 SW Old Schools Ferry Rd 220 N W Second Avenue
Beaverton, OR 97005 Portland, OR 97709
SEE: Jim Johnston, 643- 5454 SEE Ron Polui , 276 4211
/ �General Telephone Co & Tigard Water District
12460 SW Main Street 0941 SW Commercial Street
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97273
SEE Donna nonaldson, 620--0373 SEE Bob Santoo, 639-1554
Metzger Mater District L'7 Tualatin Rural Fire Protection Dist
6501 SW Taylors Ferry Road W-S SW Elligson Road
Portland, OR 97219 P.O Box 127
SEEJesse Lowman, 245-3331 Tualatin, OR 97062
SEE Gene Birchall , 692 2601
I
13125 SW Nall BW-,PO Ek)x?.3.397 TIgord.()regm 97223 (503)639-4171
/ Firs? District No 1 / 1/ Storer Cable
20665 SW Blanton 14200 SW Brigadoon Court
Aloha, OR 97062 Beaverton, OR 97V05
SEE Bert Parker, 649-8577 SEE- K. J. Strvfat, 644 -3188
/q Tigard Post Office / / State Highway Division
715 NW Hoyt 2131 SW Scho'.ls Ferry Road
P.0 Box 3047 Beaverton, CR 91005
Portland, OR 97209 97608 SEE: lee Cunderson, 229 5002
SEE: Mike Krygier, 294 2380
(JSH sb45)
,9/Sc�7 ��c' s t ftrre�tc+ifs+ �i4 le se•)h
c �e �i4Cru`SP_ //f A1111fL..ICI
Tec�v+tc 121 ►n05tv+CWr,%ACCOOP
• MR?AS S. J. C j v% 1 ,t ( -Ic_405�
T>,. 11..d 10.. -, -1 z z S
• ANN . N1�, Taws ArN6`r a1
Rd° �SUTLEit IERRAI`F Sb�V.
Dear
Attached please find ov%c set(s) of public imi rovi•ment congt rui-t ion
said plan(s) having been provided to the City for preliminary review.
Our comments are noted thereon. Please make all necessary revision(s ) and,
then, submit %ix sets) to this office to commence the "formal" circulation
and final review process.
Also, attached hereto, please find a handout which further describes the
aforesaid circulation and review process.
Very truly,
V%COY ell
cc: file
i
l
i
1
Pop' 1 14
Wit
1f w e-
ST _ - __1► ,� - t-r S� %iti. JC�✓Cr
i ..� nI
1
AA;
J
-7e-
Me
e-
290
O F�
` N
pLAN i
I - -
j 270
i
• . .t ) art � � •�,�r•• ��.�. ` • .L l —
�ks �!' st last 8 sApuar- Aw'. of txtv16+ 'rs"ac at .-
„ � +w► -+is'D ter• SvrQ', ani b�u�F� . .
�Q!( f w 01 fid . mast 'O t sTe ix: { _
' Tata�+a11+, a� �► wtwr� AvA ? ,4 �1[ i 'j3+t b tg. 1�� �►M"
must es -s►.:e at fp*}•ox h*te1 y 90 --..;; � � rt= _ �T
for to 3f 3 #A3N
J ' m -
5e -_auee�t !'Calf f "m �l d'gc 1�e �4. s? t3'`� -
1 I nsta t 1 411 ev"Of sr m sc" twi o- to 7i" $`` = �'�JeR.•n be
3 t ion , tang"tot Al 1 a01 se T 4ard miter fi3 as CDSU- �!!
oss , av�r4+b>�. asin stratiort 3a��1tg, etc, , est:
et_. . -
_ I
1 prs+l3ls "ter: i t;SL 1�r�+�t t yt 1' !'Lt� tt hQZ ► ►
,
! !�•' it s. illM '�
Qct' '.st r
cog WIP61
s b A.
4%*ta1' An Wer ti 0 UmC'-."r Pos1t1 ae�io! 4PP 1 :•.. $� '�'�4���, � �'t t,=
-101 ii� C ' ._2•".tt own a tea.
--� ppro �A�o��b+s"
11 be iwo- =* a tvv Z'i;f by Ow Ceveiooer`3 Enqimeor 7rter• to %e L"itS atC*o rioc..
t�:C L vim_
1 �
e g < < �� s ,� � �i rtti.�, t ir►t` � t���i Ot Gov�htt �ov� Co, Avt�
}
dw� occ
T - �
ARAP
06
4.
# t it 4+liie ,
-
. ;� _ . •fes • �
.'} ►'as►ped' �r ;�''�� _
c• a
w .
my-
cowl
OL
11�
-mmwv '
swl
- • 4 ;_ f
fry
" 311i IT '• 4w +�
is '�
�R
o"Irus t4b
w!
ry
day
i -3�. �ar ■._. �a S X*i� :ate �:�_ _ ti. r ._ ,. _ �� ,� •,e'1 f _ �=. �....� ■
v v
l
91TY Of TIGARD
Washingl.on County , Oregon
NOT[C1. OF f MAL OA11F'N PY Pi-ANN I t : ',OMMI SSIO11
1 Concerning Case Numh•ns•(s) : S t�-86 and V 1-8s
2. Name of Owner Samuel A. Getter SII
3. Name of Applicarlt: Same
Address 7710 SW Gentlewoods Dr. City '[igard, State OR Zfp 97224
4 . Location of Property:
Address Between the western . nd of Inez. Street and SW 97th
Tax Map and Lot No(s) . 2S1 11BA lot 1400
S. Nature of Application: Request to divide a 1 .37 acre parcel into 6 lots with a
minimum size of 7,500 s t. and to allow a cul-de-Qac of 600 ft. in length
where a maximum of 400 tt. is required.
6 Act on: Approval as requested
XX Approval with conditions
Denial
7 . Notice: Notice was published in the nevespaper, posted at City Hall and
ma11Pd to:
X The applicant 6 owners
XR owners of record within the rs•yuit .•d distance
XX Thc affected Ne ighborhoud 111ataw i rt, 1 bran i it i oi,
Affected gover•nmPntal agenri.
+Ir N :;IIAI I 11,F F"INAL (IN :in lil, I" u• tr"1 I.0 I: 1 '1.1.1
;rl -41 t tnd 01F.s' UU Iact , 1• < 1t,iota, .1: ,.1 ,,t vtit I Vol,t 1 III
I ,ttlr t . .alit ,
1 .t I •, . n '4 ,
r t tht M" tr'ion n..iy I'IH•n! t 'it! d# t-,n 1w- ,IdA•. • i � !
t i.•ii> 11
YOU hate Ugly 11t1Pt1t 01 It 1.14•Al," it i I t,i• r':t v ► f 1
F'lannlnj, Depart niell I 61'1 41 ►1
i
J
C
1TY OF TIGARD PLANNING COt"ISSION
FINAL OPUR N6. PC
A FINAL ORDER INCLUDIW33 FINDINSs AND CONCLUS:[ONS WHICH Al"'PROVES AN APP -ICATION
FOR A SLIBD!VESIOIY (S 8-86) AND Vf1RIAN(;F (V 9--86) It1W,ESTED BY SAK)EL GO-TER.
The liclalyd Planning Commission reviewed tho above application at a public
hearir►g on May 20, 1986. The Commi-tsion based it-s dvcisi'.)n on the facts,
fin(tir+ds, and conclusions rotc'd below
A. FATS
I General Information
CASE. Subdivision S 8•-86 6 Variance V 11 •66
REQUEST: To divide a 1 . 37 ar:re parcel into 6 lots with a minimum sire of
7,500 square feet and to allots a cul-de-sac of 600 feet in
length where a Maximum length of 400 fe(?t is required.
COPIPREHENSIVE PLAN Df_3IGNAVION low Densi'.y Residertial
ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5 (Restdrntial 4 . 5 units/acre)
APPLICANT: Samuel A Cotter III (*INI'R Same
7710 SW Gentlowoods Dr
Tigard, OR 97224
I
101'AlION: Between the western end of Inv/ biroet arid 97th AVenut)
(WCTM 2S1 I18A, T l 1400)
Background
y
!(imt lar Fl►•C�po�al t(\ ( CP(.4t(' d '.(',l( � il ". „` 1114` 1111( ( t pr lllllY (�
1•.•s doniad by Planning r,(lmmt . 1(''\ '' ,' /V I I,r.)
1 Vi( inity Informmtt(1n
.1 ,fir l"4 on tj1C (`t.4'it Side Itf 97th rt,lrl,.r4 (. R 4 ', rmd lrn hidob stmt lar
11 4( re,411D parcels Lu ill(, 11`'r 1h, • ir(ll(' ! I ly r(•sidori( 1`, un 8,()1►O to
1. ( " •qu(•►(` f not )rt % ((1 1114` (•.+at (+r1('1 lw(.41 11 ,, Ioni(r► Iligh "( ho"] to 1114
11 Tho land un tho w(•st s 1('I of 41t h Av(`r j. Is ,-rlyd R- 3 5 (R"sidont ial,
i •, untttlarre) and it ertn(tist- r`4 a rnmt,in.+tinn (if small m-reogo tractot and
singlo family ►°psidor.( ws .
^i tr 1nf(n m,.t t(1n .+r`d !'►('I.( ` ,' 1 , 1!' " ,
In upon t y is un(iPU4'1` ll"A ,.11'1 ! „ i1 y1` 1 r r(`•, t r 1111`
1-,1"t.4 rn pr(1pel t l (rlo, If t 1•, l 11111`1 ( d Y!1 t jorderi ar vo 111e
I 'rr(4in slopet d((wn clr.+duelIV f•, m lav%1 to 1 t A it`n f(1ol wido strip
E1r(1vides the only front(+ge (\r1 41th Av(`nue arxi !Iii ,( 1:' h('+•.torr, r(lrno► of the
4141' abuts the ter-minul; of Tru`., :tr'(`ot
The applicant proposes to extend Inez Street, forte a 600 foot long
cul-de-sac, and create six lots 'foF single fancily resiclerces . A portion
of the street PKtensio,, will ut:.lizo an existing 40 foot aide street
right-of--way which lips between the subject property and the ,junior- high
school . The remaining right of 1,Iag will be vacated.
I' 5. Agency and NPO Comments
The Engineering Division has the following convents:
a. The eight foot wide padestrian-bike path should be installed from the
proposed cul -de--sac to 97th Avenue. A twenty foot wide public
right-of--way should be reserved for the path or a .oublic easement
should be rroatod .
b. The applicant should be responsible for initiating proceclures for
vacating any remaining portions of the Inez Street right-of -way.
C . Due to they ,4mount of school age children needing safe access, the
absence of a sidowalk on the south side of Inez is not recommended
unless an appropriate alternative can be developed with the school
district
the RuOdintl Inspection Division indicates that the method for providing
sanitary and storm sower facilities should be clarified.
NPU M6 has no objections to the frroposal
The luNlalin Ru►,41 lire Protection District has no objection to the
requc, t
I
No other (omnu rlt a heive bvvri r,ac e+ved
A 1 1 NO l Nr:'`; AND CON ,I i\,r, ,
If ►, are 1igard Comproh—• i \„ 1'' 11 i , 111 ie!,
9 1 1 , I I A 4 4 1 1 , R 1 1, ,.rut 11 1 1 1 1 .+p1 1'r-,
IR ',r►, 1R .q 1 '1 ",r1 11 1r, 1 arl'! 1H 104 of the Communtt � Dovulf-I 'It code
flo P1annil'3 '.orunl .,• 1,,1 conc.loll( y Ihat Ihr (Iruputinl I� 11nc, '.1 ,• ,t with the
rel,,V ,h� t ,•,I „r iI ('.r,n,1v , 11, r,•.1VL' {�lNtl i4al.t`r] ,11„11 t11• f ,„tli, ,1•. r,,,l.,'d
(-;f Ied hr( au..v 111c N, i91i11or1 si)d 1,1„r.ninq
(►r�l•,ni. +llon ,wti %urroundinl propP►ty ownors were givon noti( e ui the
Twat inq "rid ,cl ,ll;'or turlity to Comm -0 on the iippl is atit ' ,, li►opusdl
I, ,• � � : „ ,;,. , „Illy 1 , 1,�1,1 i.,; ,1, ,.,, I m,.•,1 �
r"l '
111)1 1, y 1 1 / / .1 1 i 14 4 or r 5,+1 1,•,f 11.0 ho(auKc adoq,1 0 n aol at
s,41wor , sturrn ,i1 Nill":j►' 1a( 1 I I t is s Are av,4i 1Hble to My dr velullmrt,l
Ifso Apl\litant Al• ,1 irrii(,.if r.s lhat th(l-if- faciIilies will I:,, pr%vldod
w i l h i rl t h(' hub<I l v; 111111 W, r erlu i t r,ri by t h,, c i t y O ar,d,ard s
d. Policy 6. 1. 1 is satisfied becatse th* proposed cul-de-sac will
provide for a safe and efficfieht transportation system by providing a
terminus of this portion of Inp; Street which meet. City and Fire
District standards, except for cul ole-sac length whi(-h is discussed
below, In order- to provide adequate access to the residential area
north of the school , the City ha!, followed a policy of having Inez,
View Terrace or Moontain View extended west to 97th Avenue when
development occurs. From a traf 'ic circulation standpoint, at least
one of these streets should connec '. with 97th Avenue
The applicant has provided justification for a cul-de-sac on Inez
Street which is based primarily upon two factors . First, there is a
short, but rrrlativ@ly steep 310;10 immediately east of 97th Avenue
which would requite A significant amount Dunt of cut and fill The i
extension of View Terrace or Mountain View would riot face this
difficulty . Also, a preliminary plat approval, which has since
expired, included an @•tension of Mountain View to 97th. Second, an
intersection of Inez a,;d 97th would occur in close proximity to a
marl driveway for the junior high School which would result in a
Traffic safety hazard.
e Policy 6, 1 . 3 will be sati, ,fied whet, tha conditions of approval
relating to street improvements are completed.
f, Policy 8.4. 1 calls for t.-le provision of safe and convenient bicycle
and pedestrian access to all portions of the city . A
bi1•ycl@/pedestrian lane i-i in place on the rest side of 97th Avenue
anti eventually such a facility will be in place on tha east side as
well . The bicycle/pedestrian path shown on the plat is consistent
with this policy and is atip►opriate given 1ht siynificant amormt of
bicycle and pedestrian traffic generated by Twality Junior- Nigh
school and Templeton Flementary School .
The Planning Cnmmi,,sion conclude- that thr proposal it consistent with thE•
r'•lnv,+,11 portions of the Cnmm.nity Dnvnlopmorlt Ccde bAiori upon Thr
} nr` rl'11ed bviow
I (11,4pters 1N Y) (k 4 .5 nrno) anti Ili q7 (()ens,, cnmlull,tt inn' 1 tri
•:at isfi"d hnrrrusn Path int r ln'Pl ilt•, with I+: min,'•.'Im Int 1:r
%tandtard t1} /,S00 squa►c feel
r,t„apt or 18. 1 x,11
t it "1• R(`mUVal 1 nr111i, ^4 11t,ai 1,11 y III.-It nV.a1 11,.
yr aril ed bofnr r any It 1•1119 w1 111 tamvi t•1 1f t, 1•, t.•
Irnatl'r Stan of it)” 1 100-3 •411 t Ili mast t•r n erid of t,11,
need 1 o he romuved but 19 exp• t 1 Nd that t he ;lax imum number n1 1 r a►
gill bo retained for buffering I•nrrposes ,
11 1H If,( it a1 a1 !11V , '• 1 1: ,'te' I dl '1) 1 ',a, 1 `. 1vd 1.1 '
it 1,un t 111 "" naax lnunl 74-11111 ,1f flit 1 (14 na, (400
1 Thatra are sper Tal rite um�l,ant t•� n1 r nnrl►t inns . I f n, 1 inti + l,n
property which tare unus'jaI tend pncnll,4r ,n tho lar►c as rnmit I"rI,('
to r)1her hands .imiIar•ly %itt,a1 . (1
b. The variance is necessary for the groper design or function of
the subdivision
The gran U ny of the variance will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the rights of
other owners of property ; and
d. The variance is necessary For the preservation and enjoyment ►f
a suu+tantial property eight tecause of an extraordinary
hardship which would re a It frost strict compliance mith the
regulation of this ordinanc,a.
When Penrose Terrace subdivisi( n was developed, it was apparently
intended that Inez Street world be extended into the subject
property, possibly to 97th Avenge. The length of Ine! Street fron►
its intersection with 93rd Averue and the subject property is 130
foot . The propoyed 600 foot long cul-de-sac is necessary Vo provide
proper access to the subdivision. A street connection to 97th Avenue
is a second alternative which is not as desirable because of the l
relatively steep grade adjacent to 97th Avenue and the close 1
proximity to a driveway to the south which serves the j,lnit,r high
s c hoo 1 .
The subdivision would probably function properly with either a
cul-de-sac or through street, but for the reasons noted above, a
cul-de- sac is preferable. Also, appropriate emergency access car, be
provided. The variance will not be detrimental in any t.lay and the
additional length over required 400 foot standard contained in
Section 18 . W .U30(k) is justified
4. Chapter 19 164 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) 1
satisfied except for Section 18. 164 .030(k) which is the subjott tf
the varla nt r proposal noted abt,ve a-id the 600 foot Ior►gt h ,
appropriate
In sun►mary, tht ptopo•,t41 suhdivi- ►01, will Liv consi ,tent i&-11.
prnlicip, +t),i .I antia•tis 1f mi,dif od .4% d►,tiussod ,ahcut
esttential that trio develnpar wort, ( lootoly with the Tlgtapd l
Distrirt. to pr„vide appropr Lito bicyl to t4nd pedoytr(,4n t_„nn, 1 i”,
bat wv(rn the schtw l and ad j t,i n i nq ne i 3hbor huo,4 + as' R I •�•�x •
1; 111 (A -I(IN
Har(•d upm, 'h(, f end i og,, an('! t„. 1k .1,,, ,1► ,V,`, IIs^ I'lar,t►I h,4 ( '11,.
opprt.vos S 6-96 And V 9 -R6 sutt)et.t to Iho ftillnwir,lj 400tittiutt4
I OW;S 011t RWI'.I N,,1I H, At I Corm 11(,r, "dill I I!I r+ I pt, r'
RI(.0Rf11NG 1141 I MAI PI 01
i •1nndard t ret 1 I1111vI'vc:11 rIt*, i'
Curbs, rt+nlps , sttut,lIights, drivew, y t•,r,,r, , . It.. m d►•Aln.,-10
uti1itfor shall be 1r,I+talled alonq 0r prt,f,,t,ed ( til dr 9A( r,
Said improvemont-k shell be huilt to vity lt,tal itrout. atatldar,l.
tonft,rm to 1 he r41 tgnmer,t of ox i st inq nil j.1, „ret imps„t „In„nt
1 ” ,I r,, .11 R NO ,1h R V .I At ! .
3. Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improvemknt construction plan!
and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by
&Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed
public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for
approval .
4. Sanitary sewer domestic water and storm sewer system plan- profile
details shall be provided as part of the public imprnuement plans .
5. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until
after the Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement
plans . The Sections will require posting of a 100% Performance bond,
the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee.
Also, the execution of a construction compliance agreement shall
occur prior to, or concurrently with t.hP issuance of ,4pproved public
improvement plans . SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT_ GIVING MORL SPECIFIC
INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES, BONDING AND AGREEMENTS.
6. Street Centerline Monumentation
a In accordance with ORS 92 .060 subsection (,2), the centerlines of
all street and roadway rights-of-way shall be monumented before
the City shall accept a street improvement .
h. All centerline monuments shall be plact,d in a monument box
conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument boxes
shall be set at design finish grade of said street or roadway .
C . The following centerline monuments shall be stet:
1 ) All centerline-centerline intersection Intersections
created with "collector" or other oxisting streots, shall
by set when the centar l ine alignment of said "collector" or
othor strrct has been est,+bli-shed by tr fur tho City,
7) C� r,trr c,` ,411 cui dr-
Fill i rit
r,pr/irlt s p'11rr1 s ,it inl r•r-sm 1 ,n (P I ) wh( r) their
posit lnr fall% inside tl., llr.,, f , 1' Thr I,,iv„•mwnt f,therwise
boginninq drid pnafinq point-; tH 1, old I 1' )
4 ) Ai f.., y �4'q1 t-it n it 411 1''r, hrr Oat rd in
pr,, l h at du tt„t r ' .r ' . .r r r l r alit or l ine
8 A•i 8 tart whit 11, yr Iv/pair .t► ian path, ,and 41 t ,ytrn, 7t► f(vot wide
1r-1h1 lr I',f ' r, oil i I),• it {,u, ri t1.P Irr'd
U A qdcw,+lk h,+11 t trr .t.+t1 d rall11ig th ,r t, i Inti ;.lr4,v
which moist City si.urdar(is T liru r,t th1r, fr an alternate
mc,tslid of torminat inq 11,4 vitiitf ing :.(,tit hl it', '•ilk, which is
Al + rpt.+hl, 1,--. 1hr 1 1(1,41 %4 `=t t1+t,s1 1)istriilip►'wr-ri by thr
II,Ui• ir, tt=! ,
t). rhe unused portion of the axisti,;g Inc:z Str>Qet rt.ght-of-way shall be
tacated and said vacation sKa11 be initiated by the applicant Seo
toreen Wilson at City Hall for further- information
11 A trop cutting parmit shall be obtained prior to the removal of any
trees with a trunk dinmet.er of 6 inches or greater.
12 . After review and approval by the Planning Director and City Engineer,
tho Final Plat shall be recorded with Washington County .
13 . This approval is valid if exvr( i within one year of the final
decision date noted below.
I
It is fur•thar ordered that the apili ,-A-t bu -,t tfivd )f tho Entry of this
ordor
PASSED: thisday of May, 1966 by thr �'I,+ rainy C( mmt �sion of the City
of Tigard.
Z-2 1,"C'Z'I 9q&-r�
A. Donald Moen, President
Tigard Planning Ctssmission
(2563P)
I
I
C:TY OF TIGnRD
Washington County, Oregon
NOTJCP OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COV14SIDN
I . Concerning 1:aae Nurter, s): S 2-86 V 1-86 1 �7
2. NamIe of Owner: B1iz. ibtth Butler, 13080 SW Howard or. Tigard
3. Name of Appl scant : Samuel A. Gotter III
Add rebn 7710 SW Gontlew'oods Drive CityTigarci State OR ZSp 97224
4. Loca ion of Froperty:
Addr se(
s Between the weatetend of Inez and 97th Avenue. lOn Inez)
Tax p and Lot No(s). / 2S1 11BA lot 1400
',. Nat a of Applicatio 'Tv divide a 1.37 acre parcel into 7 lots with a minimum
v ze of 7,500 s . t„ and to allow a Cul-de-sac of bl7U teet fn length where
a maximum iengtf� r 4.uiJ rr_et is requtrea.
6. Act on: _ Approval a9rrequested
Approval r,Zndittons
Denis],-/
7. Notice: Notice vis p lishrd in a newspaper, posted at City Hall and
nailed to:
XX The pplicsnt b ovne a
�_�_ t r• of record wit in the required 1lstance
XX a affected Neighb hood Planning Organization
XX_ fected gelverneownt 1 agencies
Final Decision:
HE DECISION . LL BE FINAL ON April 4 , 198 UNLESS AN WEAL IS FILED.
The adopted f ndings of fact , decision, nd statement of condition can be
obta ed from the Planning Department Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash,
P.O. ox 2339 Tigard, Oregon 97223
9. Appeal :
Any party t the deciaton nay peal this decision t Ace rds,ice with
18.32.290(A) d Section 18.32. 0 which provides the a writ en appeal
may be filed wl in 10 days aft notice is given and nt .
The deadline for ft Ing of an ppeal is 2:30 PM A it 4 , 1986
10. Questions: If you ave any questions, pleas call the City of igard
Planning partwent , 639-4111.
(02 5 7 P) --- —'�J
t
CITY OF TIGARD
Washington County. Oregon
NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COMMI> SION
�TJJ
1. Concerning Case *ivber(s): S 2-86 V 1-86
2. Name of Owner: Elizabeth Butler, 13080 SW Howard Dr. Tigard
3. Name of Applicant: Samuel A. Gotter III
Address 7710 SW Gentlewoods Drive City Tigard State OR Zip 97224
4. Loca for of Property:
Addr as Between the western end (if Inez and 97th Avenu- . (On Inez)
Tax p and Lot Fo(s). 2S1 I1BA lot 1400
S. Nati a of Applicatio To divide a 1.37 acre parcel into 7 lots with a minimum
s ze of 7,500 sq. t. and to allow a cul-de-sac of 6UU tee` in length where
a maxitmim iengty f vUU teet is required. `
6. Action: Approval a requested
Approval editions
Denials
7. Not ce: Notice vim pl/4+lished in t e newspaper, posted at City Hall and
mailed to: �
X): The pplicant 6 ovne s
-TT-
re of record wit in the required diotance
XX a affected Neighb hood Planning Organization
XX fected gov.rnment 1 agencies
Final Decision:
HE DECISION . LL BE FINAL ON April 4 , 198 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
The adopted f oiling• of fact, decision, nd statement of condition can he
obta ed from the Planning Deprtrtment/Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash,
P.O. ox 2339 , Tigard, Oregon 91223
9. Appeal :
Any party t the decision way peal thisXonacc rdance with
18.32.290(A) d Section 18.32. 10 which prwrit Pn appeal
may be filed w! in 10 days aft notice is R
The deadline for ft Ing of an s'ppeal is 2:3098610. Questions : If you ave any questions, p City of igard
Planning partment , 639-4171 .
757P -
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
FINAL ORDER NO. 86- 07_ PC
A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WHICH DENIES AN APLICATION
FOR A SUBDIVISION (S 2-86) AND VARIANCE (V 1-86) RE94JESTED BY ELIZABETH BUTLER.
The Tigard Planning Commission reviewed the above application at a public
hearing on March 4, 1986. The Commission based its decision on the facts,
findings, and conclusions noted below.
A. FACTS
1 . General Information
CASE: Subdivision S 2-86 6 Variance V 1 86
REQUEST: To divide a 1 .37 acre parcel into 7 lots with a minimum size
of 7,500 square feet and to allow a cul-de-sac of 600 feat
in length where a maximum length of 400 feet in required.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESI(014ATION: loo: Density Residential
ZONING DESIGNATION: R--4.5 (Residential 4 5 units/acre)
APPLICANT: Samiel A. Gotter III OWNER Elitabeth Butler
771.0 SW Gentlewoods Dr 13080 SW Howard Or
Tigard, OR 972.2.4 Tigard, OR 97723
LOCATION. Between the western end of Inez Street and 97th Avenue (WCTM
2S1 119A, T L. 1400)
2 Background
No previous land use proposals have been reviewed by the City regarding
the subject property .
3 . Vicinity Information
Thi area on the east side of 97th Awk,Ciue is zoned R- 4 5 and includes
similar small acreage parcels to the north, single family residences on
8,000 to 12,000 square foot lots to the east and lwality Junior High
School to the south. The land on the wait stde of 97th Avenue i!+ zoned
R-3 .5 (Residential, 3 . 5 units/acre) and it. consists of a imbination of
small acreage tracts and single family residences
4 . Site Information and Proposal Description
The property is undRVPloppci and except for a number of lama trees near
the eastern property line, it is covered with grass and a garden area
The terrain slopes down gradually from w9st to east. . A tan foot wide
strip provides the only frontage on 97th Avenue and the southeastern
corner of the parcel abets the terminus of Inez Street
rINAI ORDER 86 07 PC (S 2 An & V 1 06) VAGI I
The applicant proposes to extend Inez Street, form a 600 foot long
cul-de-sac, and create seven lots for single family residences. A
portion of the street Extension will utilize an existing 40 foot wide
street right--of-way which lies between the subject property and the
junior high school . Tho remaining right--of.-way will be vacated. The
ten foot wide access strip is intended to be combined with adjacent
properties and not be made .% part of the plat.
5. Agency and NPO Comments
The Engineoring Division has the following comments:
a. NPO M6 should be allcw+ud to comment regaraing the design question
of a cul-de-sac vs a through street. for Inez as well as View
Terrace and Mountain Vier to the north.
b. An eight foot wide pedestrian bike path should be installed from
the proposed cul-de--sac t-) 97th Avenue. A twenty foot wide ,blic
right-of-way should be reserved for the path or a public easement
should be created.
The applicant should be responsible for initiating procedures for
vacatir,K3 any remaining portions of the Inez Street right-of-fray .
d . Due to the amount school age children needing safe access, the
absence of a sidausalk on the south side of Inar is not recommended
unless an appropriate alternative can be developed with the school
district
The Building Inspection Jivision indicates that the method for providing
sanitary sewer should be clarified.
NPO M6 has no ohjections to the proposal, but indicates that input from
the Tigard School Distri.t and surrounding property owners should be
taken into account.
The Tigard School District has no objection to the proposal , provided
the cul -de-sac does not encroach upon the school property and sufficient
room is maintained for sidewalks and greerwray .
The Tuala! in Rural Firu Protection District has no objection to the
request
No othei comments have been received
B FINDINGS AND (XMCF US IONS
The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan
policies 2 . 1 . 1, 6.3 3, 7. 1 .2, 7.3 . 1, 1.4 4, 8 . 1 . 1 , 9 . 1 .3, and 9 . 4 1 and
Chapters 19 .50, 19 92, 19. 150, 18. 160, and 18 164 of the Community
Development Code.
The Planning Commission concludes that the proposal is only partially
co.isistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based
upon the finding• noted below
F I NAI OROF R 96 07 PC (S 2 86 ` V 1 86) - PAGE 2
1
A. Policy 2 . 1 . 1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning
Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of
the hearing and an opportunity tc comment on the applicant's
proFasal.
b Poli.-,y 6. 3 .3 is not met because the single family residential
deveiopment is not c.ompatil)le with the character of this
"established area" . The proposed lot siz�as �are smaller than those
in the adjacent subdivisior which average approximately 10,000
squama foot.
c Policy 7. 1 .2, 7.3 . 1, and 7 4.4 are satisfied because adegvate
water, sewer, and storm drainage facilities are available to the
de:olopwmnt. The applicant also indicates that these facilities
will b,? provided within the subdi-ision as required by the City
standards .
d. Policy 8 . 1 1 is r.,)t satisfied bPcausr. the proposed cul-4e- sac will
exceed the maximum aitowable length of 400 feet .
e. Policy 8. 1 3 could be satisfied when `he conditions of approval
relating to street. improvements are completed. i
f. Policy 8 . 4 . 1 calls for the provision of safe and convenient
bicycle and pedestrian access to all portions of the City. A
bicycle/pedestrian lane is in place on he west side of 97th
Avenue and eventually such a facility will bo in place on the east
side ass well . A bicycle/pedestrian patio as suggested by the
Fngin4.ering Division would be consistent with this policy and
would appear appropriate given the significant amount of bicycle
and pedestrian traffic generated by Twality J,jn,or Nigh School and
Templeton Elementary School
The Planning Commission concludes that the proposal is not totally
consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Oevelopment Co►+e
based upon the findings noted below-
1 Chapter 18 .50 (R 4 .5 zone) is satisfied
2 Chapter 1f .92 (Density Computations) met b-icause the lots comply
with the 1,500 square foot standard
3 Chapter 18. 150 (Ire* Removal) requires that City approval must be
granted before any trees with r trunk diameter of 6 inches or
greater. Some of the trees a;. the Pastern end of the 3ropprty
will need to be removed but is expected that the maximum number of
trees will be retained for buffering purposes .
4 Chapter 18 160 (t_arad Division-Subdivision) is not satisfied
because Section 1P . 160. 120 which contains the following criteria
for granting a -.ariance to the maximum length of a cul-de--sac (400
feet)
F INA( ORDER 86- C7 PC (S 2 86 6 V F 86) MG1 1
a. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the
pr%party which are v;casual and peculiar to the larot as
compared to other lands similarly situated;
b. The variance :s necessary for the proper destgr, or function
of the subr+ivision;
C. The v,, ant i ng of the variar,.o will riot. Ge detrimental to the
puGlic health, safety and bielfare or injurioas to the rights
of other owners of property; and
i the variance is nacqssary for the preiervatio
nand «njoyment
of a substantial property right because of an extraordinary
hardship which would result from :-trict compliance with the
regulations of this ow-Ylinance.
When Penrose TerracR subdivision was devei,,ped, it boas apparently
intended that Inez Street would be exte used into the subject
property, possibly to 97th Muenu.•. The lenyth of Inez Street from
its intersection with 93rd Nvenue .and the subject property is 330
i feet. The proposed 600 foot long cul-de--sac is excessive and does
not appear to be necessary. A street connection to 97th Avenue is
an alternative which is not as desirable because of the relatively
steep grade adjacent to 97th Avenue and the close proximity to a
driv.vway to the south which serves the junior high school .
Nowevor, a street connection to the north has not been evaluated
5 Chapter 18. 164 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) is
satisfied with the exception of the 600 foot length which is
inappropriate.
C DECISION
Basod upon the findings, and conclusions above, the Planning Commission
denies il 2-86/V 1 .86.
It is further ordered that the applicant b-e notified of the entry of this
order.
>t�
PASSED: This .20 day of March_ 1986, by the Planning Commission of tho
City of Tigard
A. Donald Mopri, President
Tigard Planning Commission
(KSl_ pm40)
F INAI t-,RDE:R !6 D j_ PC (S 2 86 & V 1 86) PAG! 4
BUTLER TERRACE
Schedule of Prices Jot, No, 86-311
SCH':CULE A STREET CONSTRUCTICN
1,..em No. Est. Quantity Description Unit Price Total Pace
1" 1500 C.Y . Ex.-a-ration A Embank-
ment S_ :lam $ ,631,1-'a
2• 35() C.Y Base Rock (2"-0) and r
Leveling Course (3/4"-0) V `
,S^J
3' 1250 S' ". 3" AC Surfacing,
a 585 '�.
l..F. Stm;ard Concrete Curt) � . 0 .1
TOTAL S,r� r1►�,�,_1J
in place measure
SC4ECULE A - STRE..T UNSTRJCTICIV S � „2 .2
SCHEDULE C - SAAI TARY SEWERS
S'HEDULE D - 'MATER SfSTEM S g fo
TOTAL
9' 3 `T•,r*'l~t ;H!i ,�1 LVC.
r,111TILEIR 1FRRACf
Schedule cf Prices Job No. 86-311
SCNFOULC r - 'SANITARY :'EWERS
Item No. st. Quantity Description Unit Price Total Price
u ?�
1 31: L.F, furnish and install F" P.V.C. -
plastic sewer pipe -omplete
including all excav ,tlor, rock
backfill and testing.
� O
2 1 ;', L .F Furnish and i,istall 4" P.V.C.
plastic pipe complete including
all excavat+.on, rock backfill
and t.estinc;.
1 bC L.F. Furnish and install 4" P.V.C. $ /S- $�>� . ' _
plastic pipe complete including
all excavation native backfill
and testing.
Furnish and install manhole $ 19 .7�, '� $ »,
com,)lete including standard
fr;me and cover.
; 4 ca. Furnish and install B" x 4" $ Y J ),_ ,Ir , o
tees.
TOTAL
.l
BUTLER TERRACE.
Schedule of Price!. Jot No E6- 11.
SCHEDULE D - WATER SYSTEM
Item No. Est. Qu_ntity Description Unit P-ioc Total Price
1 265 L.F. 5" ductile iron pipe zom-
Flete including all fit-
tings and other .eppurtances.
All excavation , backfill ,
testing and disinfection.
1 Each 6" date valve complete1p
!r S �
3 1 Each ?" blo +off unit complete S h0, .23 0
TOTAL S ___
CITY OF TIGARO, OR
OE%ELOMENT SERVICES DEPT
<�\ANCAV . UEVEL-OPPWIl1- PROJECT
GVNERAI_ INFORMATION SHEET
1. PROJECT W. :
II. "ROJEGT NA4E 'S1.T �_. �t.s Y of t' �LI�fOV
III . PT(MIING (TLTI-C) : dated:
IV PLAT (1'ITl .;1 : dated
SI' E tOCATfOY:
VI PRIM.IPALS:
(1) OEVI:Lt)PE:R: `jam �° _ �, 9
C I�,41 S I !z elf x�l�' F. (s*
Address Phoria No. 'f+-
(2) DI VEt OE►EPS SURETY AGENC Y
Addross Phone No
Pond �No - - `—r--- --- -' EKp. Oate___/
(3) EkGrIl.EER:! t��14_�1�:.t�g 'StIAp
Address , , e�2 zg` Phone No -_372
I
(4) INSII:CTOR:
Addrese t `ror.r No.
(5) I'R IMi: OONTRACTOR
Address Phor,.r No
(6) CC►NTRIM:TORS SURETY AG'NCY
AddrF-is Phoma Na
Bond No __.y-- - --- E sp [late
( 1) rUfl CONTRACTORS
O116S I
dmj