Hearings Officer Packet - 02/10/1983 - Randall •
rrC a
•
4t,
4`
1640 HEARING OFFICER DECISION
tlw 2/83 Robert Randall Company 'r
ZC 1-83
.f
a
•
f
•
,
f
•
1 ,
•
I
III w
I
I
•
BEFORE THE HEARINGS OFFICER
FOR THE CITY ^l' TIGARD -"
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION )
FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM WASHINGTON ) No.
COUNTY DESIGNATION OF M-1 TO CITY )
OF TIGARD DESIGNATION C-5; Robert ) ZC 1-83
Randall Company, applicant.
The above-entitled matter came before the Hearings Officer
at the regularly scheduled meeting of February 10, 1983, at
which time testimony, evidence and the planning department
staff report were received; and
The Hearings Officer adopts the findings and conclusions
contained within the staff report, a copy of which is attached
hereto and incorporated by reference herein and marked Exhibit
"A"; therefore
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
ZC 1-83 is approved subject to the condition that the
applicant shall apply for an receive Site Design Review api:roval
under the provisions of Chapter 18. 59 of the Tigard Municipal
Code for any development on the subject property.
DATED this 47. ' d-ay of February, 1983.
HEARINGS OFFICER
APPROVED:
(VC-
/
BETH MASON
•
--Kh -+- '`n "
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 2.1
CITY OF TIGARD HEARINCS OFFICER
February 10, 1983 - 7:00 P.M.
Fowler Junior High School - French Room
10865 S.W. Walnut Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
A. GENERAL FACTS
CASE: ZC 1-83 ZONE CHANGE Robert Randall Company NPO A 4
REQUEST: To change the zoning designation from Washington County M-1 to
City of Tigard M-4 Industrial. Park on the rear portion of the
property and to C-S Hi6hway Commercial on the front portion.
RECOMMENDATION: Based on staff's review, site inspection and
information supplied by the applicant, staff
recommends that Lhe Hearings Officer approve the zone
change requested subject to conditions listed in the
Staff Report.
APPLICANT: The Robert Randall Company OWNER: Hazel J. Anderson
9500 S.W. Barbur Blvd. 9931 Deerhaven
Portland, Oregon 9721.9 Santa Ana, Calif. 92705
LOCATION: North of. S.W. 79th on the east side of Pacific Highway
(Washington Count; Tax Map 1S1 36CD lot 2200) .
LOT AREA: 5.94 Acres
PRESENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Highway Commercial and Industrial
Park.
• NPO COMMENT: No written comments had been received from NPO A 4 at the
writing of this report.
PUBLIC COMMENT: Thirty six notices were mailed to surrounding property
owners. No written comments had been received at the
writing of this report.
1
BACKGROUND: This property was annexed to the City on October 29, 1982, by
the Portland Metropolitan Arca Local Government Boundary
• Commission.
VICIAITY INFORMATION: The property to the north is developed as commercial
uses. The property is zoned C 3 and is designated
Highway Commercial on the NPO A 4 Elan Map.
•
' aI'
The properties to the south and east are vacant and
are designated Industrial Park ort he NPO 14 Plan Map.
The area to the west has been developed as single
family residential and is designated single family
residential on the NPO 1 4 Plan Map.
SITE INFORMATION: The site is vacant, sloping to the south at up to 10%.
There are a few small trees on the northern portion of the
site. The remainder of the site is covered with brush and
• tall grass.
B. APPLICABLE PLANNING POLICIES
1. ZONE CHANGE:
The proposed zone change from Washington County M-1 to M-4 on the
rear portion and G-5 on the front portion of the property will bring
the zoning on Tax lot 2200 into conformance with the adopted NPO 14
Plan map which designates the front portion C-S and the rear portion
M-4 .
2. LCDC Statewide Planning Goals
a. Citizen Involvement - Goal I 1 - The purpo:ae of this goal is to
allow for the opportunity for interested citizens to be involved
in all phases of the planning process. Notices were sent to all
• owners of record within 250 feet of the subject property . A
public notice was published in the Tigard Times on January 27 ,
1983.
b. Land Use - Goal 12 All applicable LCDC goals and guidelines ,
NPO 14 plan policies and Tigard Municipal Code Sections were
considered in review of this application.
c. Economy Goal 9 The intent of this goal is to diversify and
improve the economy of the state. Currently, the subject
property is vacant . The property is within the Tigard Triangle,
a prime commercial and industrial redevelopment area. The
applicant intends to develop the property into commercial and
industrial land uses which will create the potential for new
jobs in Oe area. In addition, the development of the property
may encourage the development of other vacant parcels in the
triangle.
d. Public Facilities and Services Goal 111 - The intent of this
goal is to insure the provision of public facilities to the
site. Sewer is available to an 8" line which presently serves
the 79th Ave . subdivision to the west or to a 10" line which
serves the ORA property to the east. Water is available from a
30" line which runs through the ORA property to the east. Site
drainage will be addressed at Site Design Review.
ZC 1-83 Page 2
•
•
e. Transportation - Goal A 12 - The purpose of this goal is to
insure safe and adequate transportation systems. The site will
be served via a road which has been proposed from the light at
79th and Pacific Highway that will utimately connect to S.W.
72nd. The applicant's proposal for seving the site is
attached. The applicant has come to a tentative agreement with
the neighboring property owner for his proposed road alignment.
3. NPO * 4 POLICIES
POLICY 21. In the Interest of safety and efficienty, the number of
highway access points must be kept to a minimum. Wherever
possible, businesses on Pacific Highway should be clustered
and share common parking facilities and driveways. As new
development occurs, the number of access points should not
exceed the number necessary for property on-site traffic
circulation and, where possible, should be combined with
access to adjacent businesses .
POLICY 24. &
POLICY 28. Development shall coincide with the provisions of public
streets, water and sewerag facilities. These facilities
shall be (a) capable of adequately serving all intervening
properties as well as the proposed development, and (b)
designed to meet city or county standards.
POLICY 29. Industrial development should conform to high standards for
building and site design. The Site Design Review staff
will review the site plan of each proposed development, as
provided in the zoning ordinance, in order to evaluate the
compatibility of vehicular access, signs, lighting,
building placement and designs, and landscaping with
adjoining uses, both existing and proposed. The examples
of good design, already present in the neighborhood, should
provide the norm for the Site Design Review when
considering new development and the expansion of existing
ones.
POLICY 31. Industrial development on signle parcels of less than an
acre will be discouraged.
All public improvements shall be made to city standards for said
improvements . A copy of the NPO f 4 Plan transporation system proposalis
attached to this staff report as Exhibit "B" as stated earlier, the
applicants proposed zone change conforms to the approved NPO x 4 plan.
Design consideration for development will be addressed at Site Design
Review.
2:C 1-83 Page 3
•
4. TIGAZJ MUNICIPAL CODE:
There are no specific criteria in the Tigard Municipal Code which
address zone changes. Therefore, stafi: relies on LCDC goals and
guidelines and NPO x 4 policies.
C. CONCLUSION
The proposed zone change proposal meets applicable planning policies. The
development of the site will be reviewed and approved through Site Design
Review.
D. CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall apply for Site Design Review under the provisions
of Chapter 18.59 of the Tigard Municipal Code.
PREPARED BY: lizebeth k. Newton
Associate Planner
ZC 1-83 -- Page 4
NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL FOR ZONE CHANGE
APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE ROBERT RANDALL CO.
FOR TAX LOT 2200 1S136 CD
The application submitted by the Robert Randall Company for the subject
property is intended to change its zoning designation from Washington
County M-1 (the property has been recently annexed to Tigard) to its
equivalent City designation M-4 on the rear portion of the property
and to Highway Commercial C-3 on the front portion. These designations
are in conformance with current plan maps for the area maintained by
the City of Tigard as well as the proposed comprehensive plan, as
amended, being submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council.
•
I52.1e _j i" o 00
121.0• .0e �
I l 8---?03.1r
_2 I ( i i 7 \ c. -
i1e9°ie'w 1300 0 •1 I,1
1200 i .d/Ac ••• •• �� `st
4/Ac • ^'
N O / ir
m f :„t/
1;6`° 4,e �' .�' es Ac. c: 1601
.9/4 c
sollo
• °,. .,,t. r
`:p
018 0 e :4‘1//.. JJ
n `�! / \``♦Z�Ac �1�� 'fir /
•
•••• .,, ,L
�+ .O S89°22'E , ,\ ‘' ' A,- o
IA
2 !• t •
• Q '�• 200 ; aes
! \ N,%,.i z230w
itir. 5.94 Ac 2 y..N.;;.u'• Sc cor
t• r
RANI)AL-1— 5,11-1 AC- 1 ses°�o'E "'e; 20C
, (7446, itlf: (A/Y RDA ( 2y Ac.) 4$ a }: c�
a 3'10 Ac o {
Q`jI* . 300 -
I e I y. o
1 Bili`lil
: i w 7.4 r w ;3 i`t '
ih:
•
f?et
N =1 iO19 11e2.4 ` rr ;,�J
17----)
e w e Hee°'5 zU Eas _ 3•• a .i. .�
W 2400 - I - -- , H'
le2n.j� ., •;?
" t/7 9 !; '- 'r F►Nle;
I ,/1I8 141 3 e '' Ue/� �C
0
4,; t; - ,�
> ��
N 1..A
I� 15S9S n Ll., x ,
� Q itt.
, • 2600 n N ,ef,,le Pi
N • t ) r�, J
f
- ~
3 4
•n O. tti I`, M1iNr16 ,31.51 /�I r �`..k
, 2700 ;NO
\ 1 1I J - -
en
4 • 15 441 SI
'=J 2800 �; 1
; F-- : _
. oli, : 23 - 82 ``� . , ,.,
/1"
r..? 14 12313 _ .11
°'
b
ik ; 2900 {
Jz A,-' fc �:0
�3 „
•
n I3 I47.40 '
Nee•1e 20 c
73000 y N til 1�'
200 • .,
. 12 :{ %
yi. • . r ,,,/.:"ri .- 1....._. :_. J L....2s_.!; I L_:J 1.__ __....1Lij---:: -:...) 1 i
M
V4".1'.t_—-—V— . t i .,.
` • is '♦ .
/ Sr ••.N 1
,•♦ I� \F • — / f. 1 � .
` \y:t
l II / ,cu•to ll• -
•
4,. 1
1Step , .
t.•,c ,
:. , .•L. -_T, of I .�
1
• II i•: ',. -1' •. . I.
•
`�\\t•�y-\11� .111.^, i..l.. I ,I
Ai y =-.77...:.:22..� r�..� 6...:::-...:1 I'I ;:._...1
I 11 11 al`-J L3 E„,..,,,, ou ,, --sr.,. \•:J_i� ,• • • I'
�••�' tea/ �+a D.. �� sTu tti i.: ! r o.. )i__ I, I sr 1....,4„..„1.,,,!!
�`- '=11, ` '" i
ij
Sp..",j,..rt I.' t.1/4.4%;,,,,... "\--..---"‘ IF---itt„
3 ;
.�'-iiii��iri '•
R fT
i •} ._ •• fin;
D .
•
�:
.1 ,,
_..., ,.....:.„ ______
! ,. . •• ,
I
•r 1,
/ : j — • 1 ,,
"fit:..• '- „ ;i , i,
1
If ;i J1. •
lkt I'_ ..I I_.J'1._ '
1 -'�
1 ,. i I
\._ \• .1l r1 r
` r 1. l•• S....•.•
N.
',,�_ • IL
V7 ,r I+• • eKurt1,\\
I i '
•
15 .. '`';.,
Figure 3
I
...„.N. __..,r.u.
. ...,,.i.„._ .. • ,. ,./- — I-i---7.! • f .
l
Vii:..
::i i:iu •
•
s_.o,�-.—s_ - 1 p r —
•1% e .ti
•,..n.i 4: ,- 4:1'... .?' ' _.,„.5'----:. .-. 1.".- ""
VS
t.,, %,(........ ...41 yrD .: (..^ I Tr T .. .— . .
• ot . Duval/ SI II lo• 4 • 4
+a 4 / •.. fr. U 7 ....?•rr:"':'
,1 ..., —•<:•• 1 _ t L- t 111,•
LtY+'
.•fA'IM70 J a 1 ...
L. 7 1 ..rr 1 .
/ wi !- I 1. : _ ;r0 : - :
`
•
4.. �r �_ -��-/
r..----/1-.T.'// it I i i iN l v�1�J:• 0•• t,1 \ 'I. `' „ '1
___ALL,/•//,// /� •il 11
v o.. �� 1•l9 y•lr ,r I ou r `.i 1 ..ILL r �� ,.
' .i ii I• . i.
s\__,..- `r, cl 1!
).
..,...s.. .3.,.......„- Li,
r • ....•+',1 i +• n� it
" \. ,.. \\)_ t
. \ ;
•
` s --- •t, r - •- �4/ -
Ci •1, r
Step •.. . }..,„„..
.. .. ,
r .,
lL-'� -�! `'' , J ,r ; L\••10. 1! . J.
•?
r• • ••• 1.. •••"'-...... ..-- ST. - r -/ ..sr:ce010;°Hri
l/ v `- , pfiJ:J :'
•
y I
.; • (\j i , .
16
Figure 4171
•
r r