Report (92) i.Sr 2oi8 GO 7 I . q33 fit-)ez. -.ert4,.4c,e i31-u1)
"RIVER TERRACE� EAST"
LOT 774
HUB AND TACK CERTIFICATION
NE & SE1f4SEC, 6, T2S, R1 W, W.M.
CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON
SURVEYED February 20, 2018
PREPARED FOR: S
. POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY
' 703 BROADWAY ST., SUITE 510
VANCOUVER, WA. 98660
\\ss:::\\: I
\+\
LOT
'\ 173
,„Li.--PUBLIC SIDEWALK [
' \ EASEMENT 8
r'i
2/.55,- . N8 '58*43#w 99.34'
,0,---21,21'
s _.»
14)
NO0"Oy'17"E
2t}.fi1' 20.00'
71 \\\ i
21.0174 a` ti
o c
a ! ce
1 u. w 2{I,22 N8 '58'43"W 98.00' ```"`,27.,21.j
I.�,. n w
\\.....; r-i
0
/ 38' D
0
z 0o
. 6' PUBLIC UTILITY LOT ; m
CO
I EASEMENT 175 8' PUBLIC UTILITY LU
I I EASEMENT
1
0
W
I-
o REGISTERED LSI
v PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYORLJ
A ---4.'....,„,6 _
LOT I
176
OREGON
a. JULY 9,2002
m
TRAVIS C. JANSEN
57751
RENEWS:6/30/2019
in, I, TRAVIS C. JANSEN, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SCALE
o SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF OREGON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 20 0 10 20
0i I HAVE ACCURATELY SURVEYED AND STAKED THE OFFSETS 1.101%." .1111.111
TO THE FOUNDATION ENVELOPE FOR LOT 174 OF THE PLAT
o OF "RIVER TERRACE EAST". 1 INCH = 20 FEET
2 DRAWN BY: FAA
DATE.C2/20/18 r
REVIEWED BY: TCJ DATE PACIFIC COMMUNITY ITY 3E I I I
t PROJECT NO.. 395---041 PLANNING - E GIPt1=1=tII G - SURVEYING
(5O3) 941-9484
t1
{ '-xt
GEODESIGNV FIELD REPORT
Page_1 of 2
GDi Project: Polygon-129-03Prepared By:
Kyle Hanson
Project Name: River Terrace East Date: 2/22/18
Location: SW Scholls Ferry&Roy Rogers,Bvrtn. Report#: 206
Arrival. 1400 Departure: 1445 .. ....
Weather: Sunny, 30s Permit#: TBD
Site Visit Requested By: Spencer(NEI) Met With (on site): Keywest crew, Spencer
(phone)
Purpose: Observe wall backfill and Lots 173-175
Outstanding Issues: Proof roll road and curb base rock and repair as needed before paving
FR-58(12/06) Decommission temporary storm and sewer lines through Tract E
FR-177 soft fill from slope cut in lots 153, 154 and 155
Wall Bckfill Observation
Upon arrival, I observed Keywest crew placing Lock+Load blocks and backfilling where indicated on the attached site
plan. I was informed that backfill material was 3/" minus crushed rock sourced for Baker(Farmington). Compaction
efforts were completed utilizing a large walk behind plate compactor. Using a Troxler 3430 nuclear density gauge, I
tested the density of the granular backfill and compared the results against a lab produced proctor(ASTM Dl 557)
value of 127.2pcf at 13.6 percent optimum moisture content. Areas tested met or exceeded our compaction
recommendations of 95%maximum dry density value. Pin resistance(the number of blows required to drive a%"
diameter steel pin 1 foot into the material)of the backfill indicated dense backfill conditions today, and the material
was firm/unyielding underfoot and well keyed.
Lots 173-175 Observation
I observed subgrade structural fill material where indicated on the attached site plan for Lots 173-175. I was
informed that the fill consisted of 3/4"-0 recycled concrete from Tigard Sand&Gravel by Spencer with NEI. The
material was compacted in 1 foot lifts with a large segmented pad roller and had a total thickness of approximately
12 feet. Using a Troxler 3430 nuclear density gauge, I tested the density of the material and compared the results
against a maximum dry density of 118 pcf at 14.5 percent optimum moisture content. Areas tested met or
exceeded our compaction recommendations of 95%maximum dry density value. Pin resistance(the number of
blows required to drive a 3/4"diameter steel pin 1 foot into the material)indicated dense to very dense conditions
today,and the material was firm/unyielding underfoot.
Conclusion
Based on observations,density testing,and pin resistance, it is our opinion that wall backfill and subgrade fill for
Lots 173-175 observed today,at the approximate elevations/locations evaluated and where indicated on the
attached site plan(s), have been/are being prepared in general accordance with our geotechnical recommendations,
9450 SW Commerce Circle,Suite 300 1 Wilsonville,OR 97070 1503.968.8787 I www.geodesigninc.com
r
I
DESIGN FIELD REPORT
Page 2 of 2
Distribution:
Attachments: Site Plan (2); NDGD(1)
Reviewed by: SMD
This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and
specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction contractor,ts The hecontractor's employees
or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary
be
considered final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the'Reviewed fir section
Signature:
9450 SW Commerce Cirde,Suite 300 I Wilsonville,OR 97070 1503.968.8787 I www.geodesigninc.com