09/14/1990 - Packet E
AGENDA
Meeting between the Parks Board and City Council
Introduction...Pat Reilly
Presentation of proposed mission statement.. .Ed Murphy
Presentation of Parks Board reaction. ..Dr. Graham
General Discussion
Decision
Status report on the Parks levy improvements
Cook Park restroom discussion
AM
tAALA
Ct , CAA/✓�a^"
Com. 1 I�
MEMO
TO: Pat Reilly, city Administrator
FROM: Ed Murphy, Community Development Directo
RE: Parks Board Mission
DATE: September 14, 1990
Attached to this memo is a draft mission statement for the Parks Board, which
is intended to be a statement of priorities for the staff and Parks Board and
Council over the next year.
This memo will more fully explain the situation and the mission statement.
1. CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PARRS LEVY IMPROVEMENTS.
The staff, working with consultants and the parks crews, will be responsible
for implementing the park levy improvements. The Parks Board will provide a
monitoring role, which means that they will receive status reports regularly;
give advise to the staff and City Council; review the general plans for each
separate project before it goes out to bid; assist with establishing
priorities; assist with the capital budget; and assist with communications
with the public.
2. DEVELOP A "YEAR 2000 ACTION PLAN FOR PARR AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES FOR
THE CITY OF TIGARD AND THAT AREA WITHIN THE CITY'S AREA OF INTEREST.
The City has a Parks Master Plan already. The problem is that it is did not
tie resources to the Plan. The Plan appears to be very unrealistic, and
particularly since a lot of the available land is now committed to housing or
other uses, and the price of land has increased significantly. Meanwhile, the
City has limited resources available to carry out the Plan.
Another factor is that the Bull Mountain area, in particular, is developing
rapidly. Much of that growth is outside the city limits. No development of
park or recreational facilities is occurring outside the city limits, nor are
any resources being collected or dedicated to the provision of park and
recreational facilities.
An "Action Plan" would use the Parks Plan as a base document for an
implementation plan. This action plan would consider land available, resource
availability, top priority needs, and methods for actually acquiring and
developing the facilities that are needed over the next 8-9 years. It would
consider the Bull Mountain and Metzger areas as well as the area already within
the City Limits.
The Action Plan would involve the community in the decision making process,
setting out top priority needs and matching resources to those needs. It would
place special emphasis on larger community parks; sports facilities; and
acquisition of land before the opportunity to do so is gone.
3. DEVELOP NEW RESOURCES FOR PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY
IMPROVEMENTS.
Currently, the only city resources available are system development charges
and the parks levy...other that normal maintenance funds. No resources are
forthcoming within the area outside the current city limits. The resources
available are not nearly enough to handle the needs, even if those "needs" are
defined very conservatively.
This effort would review other potential methods for increasing the amount of
resources available. These could include SDC's; joint ventures with other
agencies, like the school district or the city of Tualitin; private donations;
developer dedications; and future tax levies; and commitment of funds by
Washington County.
The staff, working with the Parks Board, will take these three mission
statements, and develop the necessary work program to accomplish them. The
Parks Board will provide regular status reports to the City Council on their
progress, and will meet with the Council as necessary to refine the City's
policies and direction.
cc.. Dr. Graham, Parks Board Chairman
Ron Bunch, Senior Planner
ejm/parkboard.mi3
i
.v:
1��• 'fv :v:..............nn......n.....:........1::%�MN��..:�.•.'•.•.vRrvv............::::
n...nr
The Parks Board mission for the next year will be as follows:
1. Continue to monitor the implementation of the Parks levy
improvements.
2. Develop a "Year 2000 Action Plan for Park and Recreational
Facilities for the City of Tigard and that area within the
City's area of interest.
3. Develop new resources for parkland acquisition and
recreational facility improvements.
i
TABLE 4
COST SUMMARY TO IMPLEMENT THE PARKS SYSTEM
BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE 1987 TIGARD PARK PLAN
COSTS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING TIGARD PARKS
PARK TYPE PRIORITY
HIGH MEDIUM LOW
1. MINI-PARKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 62,000 $ 3,500. $ 87,000
2. NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS. . . . . . . .$ 608,500 $ 320,000 $ 601,000
3. COMMUNITY PARKS. . . . . . . . . . .$ 704,500 $ 900,000 $ 639,270
4. LARGE URBAN PARKS. . . . . . . . .$ 596,950 $1,067,300 $ 50,000
5. GREENWAYS/PARK PATHS. . . . . .$ 364.000
6. SUBTOTAL (Lines 1 -5) $2,335,950 $2,290,B00 $1,377,270
COSTS TO CORRECT ACREAGE AND FACILITIES DEFICIENCIES IN EXISTING PARK
SYSTEM
PARK TYPE PRIORITY
HIGH MEDIUM LOW'
7. MINI-PARKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 892,400
8. NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS. . . . . . . . .$ 715,600 $ 114,000 $ 100,000
9. COMMUNITY PARKS. . . . . . . . . . . .$1,510,650
10. LARGE URBAN PARKS. . . . . . . . . . $4,457,600 $1.414.000
11. SUBTOTAL (Lines 7-10) $6,683,850 $1,528,000 $ 992,400
COST FOR PARK SYSTEM EXPANSION
PARK TYPE PRIORITY
HIGH MEDIUM LOW
12. MINI-PARKS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 400,000 $ 750,000
13. NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS. . . . . . . . $1,600,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
14. COMMUNITY PARKS. . . . . . . . . . .$2,000,000 $3,300,000 $1,450,000
15. LARGE URBAN PARKS. . . . . . . . .$4,000,000 $5,900,000 $2, 100,000
16. GREENWAYS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 800.000 $2,320,000 $2,880,000
17. SUBTOTAL (Lines 12-16) $ 8,400,000 $13,920,000 $ 9, 180,000
TOTAL (Lines 6+11+17) $17,419,800 $17,738,800 $11,549,670
LESS 1989 TAX LEVY $ 1 ,750,000
SUBTOTAL $ 15,669,800 $17,738,800 $11,549,670
GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATE TO IMPLEMENT 1987 TIGARD PARK PLAN = $ 44,958,270
14
li+i�i��,�P►��
TABLE 1
COST SUMMARY TO CORRECT DEFICIENCIES IN EXISTING PARKS SYSTEM
BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE 1987 TIGARD PARK PLAN
COSTS FOR- IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING TIGARD PARKS _
PARK TYPE PRIORITY
HIGH MEDIUM LOW
1. MINI-PARKS. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .$ 62,000 $ 3,500 $ 87,000
2. NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS. . . . . . . .$ 608,500 $ 320,000 $ 6ol,000
3. COMMUNITY PARKS. . . . . . . . . . .$ 704,500 $ 9o0,000 $ 639,270
4. LARGE URBAN PARKS. . . . . . . . .$ 596,950 $1,067,300 $ 50,o00
5. GREENWAYS/PARK PATHS. . . . . .$ 364,060
6. SUBTOTAL (Lines 1-5) $2,335,950 $2,290,800 $1,377,270
COSTS TO CORRECT ACREAGE AND FACILITIES DEFICIENCIES IN EXISTING PARK
SYSTEM
PARK TYPE PRIORITY
HIGH MEDIUM LOW
7. MINI-PARKS- - - - - - - -- - - --- - $ 892,400
S. NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS. . . . . . . . .$ 715,600 $ 114,000 $ 100,000
9. CONMNUNITY PARKS. . . . . . . . . . . .$1,510,650
10. LARGE URBAN PARKS. . . . . . . . . .$4,457,600 $1.414.000
11. SUBTOTAL (Lines 7-10) $6,683,850 $1,528,000 $ 992,400
TOTAL (Lines 6+11) $ 9,019,800 $ 3,818,800 $ 2,369,670
LESS 1989 TAX LEVY $ 1,750,000
GRAND TOTAL $ 7,269,800 $ 3,818,800 $ 2,369,670
DST
TABLE 2-A
POTENTIAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE
TO FUND HIGH PRIORITY LAND ACQUISITION AND IMPROVEMENT COSTS
IN GROWTH RELATED COMMUNITY AND LARGE URBAN PARKS
Land Acquisition Future Community Parks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 2,000,000'
Land Acquisition Future Large Urban Parks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 4.000.000=
Subtotal $ 6,000,000
SDC Based on Growth Projection of Tigard Park Plan -
o Land Acquisition Only. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$1,065 per unit
SDC Based on Growth Projection of Finance Department -
o Land Acquisition Only. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$1,690 per unit4
Improvements Future Community Parks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 4, 750,000
Improvements Future Large Urban Parks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 8.000.000
Subtotal $ 12,750,000
SDC Based on Growth Projection of Tigard Park Plan -
Improvements ents Onl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
per unit
o Y
P
Department -De Finance
SDC Based on Growth Projection �,f P
o Improvements Only. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$3,591 per unit6
SDC Based on Growth Projection of Tigard Park Plan -
o Land Acquisition and Improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,329 per unit
SDC Based on Growth Projection of Finance Department -
o Land Acquisition and Improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$5,281 per unit
NOTES TO TABLE 2-A
1 . Based on acquiring 50 acres C $40,000 per acre. See 1987 Tigard
Park Plan p.23.
2. Based on acquiring 100 acres G $40,000 per acre. See 1987 Tigard
Park Plan p.24.
3. Based on papulation of 40,000 by the year 2000. Uses Finance
Department estimate of 27,050 as of 1989-90 as current population
base. This leaves a growth of 12, 950. This is divided by Metro' s
5 630 dwelling " units to be
per household fielding ,
to of 2.3 Y
estimate p , -
built. Dividing the land acquisition subtotal by the dwelling units
_ $1 065/unit SDC.
4. Based on population of 36, 526 by the year 2000. Uses Finance
Department estimate of 27,050 as of 1989-90 as current population
base. This leaves a growth of 9,476. Finance Department estimate
of the number of building units is 3, 550. This is divided into the
land acquisition subtotal = $1, 690/unit SDC.
5. Improvements subtotal divided by 5,630 dwelling units. See note 3.
6. Improvements subtotal divided by 3,550 dwelling units. See note 4.