The URL can be used to link to this page

04/01/1992 - Packet AGENDA NPO #7 MEETING WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 1992 - 7:00 P.M. TIGARD CITY HALL - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON 1. Call to order 2. Roll Call. Woolery Blanchard Cunningham Dorsett Gross Howden McGlinchy 3. Approve Minutes from March 4, 1992 meeting (attached). 4. ZOA 92-0002 - Korean First Baptist Church - Applicant requests amendment to Section 18.64.040(A) of the City of Tigard Community Development Code to allow religious assembly as a conditional use in the Professional Commercial zoning district. 5. ZOA 92-0003 - Planning Department - City of Tigard - Applicant requests amendment to City of Tigard Community Development Code to revise handicapped parking standards and to allow gravel parking areas in certain situations. 6. Proposed Amendments to Temporary Sign Requirements. 7. Review Notices of Decision Received 8. Other Business 9. Adjournment TO ENSURE A QUORUM FOR THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS, PLEASE CONTACT LIZ NEWTON AT 639-4171, EXT. 308 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. h:Ilogin1jolnpo7-A NPO #7 Meeting Minutes March 4, 1992 Meeting called to order: 7:10 p.m. Present: Woolery, Blanchard, Dorsett, Howden, McGlinchy Excused: Gross Absent: Cunningham • Approved Minutes of February 5, 1992 as read. Approved. In favor: 5 Against: 0 • Wallace, G./Eva L. Sweeney, 11455 SW Walnut. Proposal for annexation to the City of Tigard. Motion: Larry McGlinchy, to approve Case No. ZCA 92-0003. Seconded: Jim Blanchard -- In favor: 5 Against: 0 • Case No. CPA 92-0001. Request for zone change from R-12 to R-25. Motion: Ed Howden, to table this until next meeting to allow the surrounding residents to be notified, a period of comment, until Item F of the application elements is satisfied. Seconded: Cal Woolery -- In favor: 5 Against: 0 • Discussion of Community Commercial Zone. Motion: Ed Howden, to approve comments regarding New Community Commercial District as follows: NPO #7 endorses the new Community Commercial district. However, we advocate additional limits on scale. First, this district should include a lower 30,000 sq ft limit on single grocery store gross floor area. Second, this district should exclude the conditional use process to raise a limit on single store gross floor area. Third, this district should include a limit on total commercial gross floor area (versus civic gfa) equal to 25% of site gross acres. We now agree with Mssrs. Bewersdorff and Offer that this commercial district could be compatible with residential areas at major collector-major collector intersections. We now understand that this district would be smaller than 8 acres at some sites to be compatible with surrounding residential areas. We concede that this district could better serve some residential areas from sites at some major collector-major collector intersections. We still argue that this commercial district should include low limits for single grocery store gfa (30,000 sq ft) and single general retail store gfa (10,000 sq ft) to ensure that such stores would be compatible with residential areas. Low limits on gross floor area for single stores would: ` • • 1. Soften storefronts within residential areas; 2. Promote stores that provide convenience shopping for nearby residents (see Matt Marcott exhibit); 3. Limit stores that provide comparison shopping for general consumers;and 4. Promote a variety of goods and services at one location (see Shopping Center Build-out exhibit). We also argue that this district should exclude the conditional use process to raise a limit on single store gross floor area. It is the right of residents to set limits on single store gfa now (versus hearings officers later) to ensure stores would be compatible with their neighborhoods. And we still argue that this district should include a limit on total commercial gross floor area to promote some civic use (branch library) within residential areas. We suggest a limit on total commercial gfa equal to typical site coverage of one-story retail build-out. Seconded: Jim Blanchard -- In favor: 4 Abstain: 1 Motion: Cal Woolery, that minutes be submitted to Planning Commission open record of Monday, March 2, 1992 as NPO #7 position. Seconded: Ed Howden -- In favor: 5 Against: 0 • Meeting adjourned 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Katy Dorsett IoginU1z\npo7m1n.392 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO. : ZOA 92-0002 FILE TITLE: KOREAN FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH APPLICANT: Korean First Baptist Church OWNER: 8406 S.E. Morrison Street Portland, Oregon 97216 REQUEST: A request by Korean First Baptist Church to ammend section 18.64.040 (A) of the City of Tigard Community Development Code to allow religious assembly as a conditional use in the Professional Commercial zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.22.040, 18.64.040 (A) . LOCATION: CITY WIDE NPO NO.: I NPO CHAIRPERSON: PHONE NUMBER: CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION COMMENTS ARE DUE BACK TO STAFF ON 1991. XX PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: ATTACHMENTS VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN XX NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer - 639-4171 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST NPO # 7 ZOA 92-0002: REQUEST: A request by Korean First Baptist Church to ammend section 18.64.040 (A) of the City of Tigard Community Development Code to allow religious assembly as a conditional use in the Professional Commercial zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.22.040, 18.64.040 (A) . LOCATION: CITY WIDE. Please review the attached development proposal and comment on those items listed below which concern(s) this NPO regarding this application. This listing is a template to aid in your review of this proposal. Please let us know how you feel about this development taking place in your portion of the city. Thank You. Access To and From Site Traffic Impact Neighborhood Impact Environmental Impact COMMENT: NO COMMENT: [ ] Signed: Date: _zJ6�4i %- Z 797e-V5�eW- !� 7Lo La cJ A� Li e oils' .��'sc�i-i.��1y and Co IV, % 4// C'o v oae .�v�7- ,may y�c T O1Y )lpC'S�1,19 T/ � �D�hi W C-Z�— LISe`S. !l-y1 S !S cp ' y W(r- 7-, o-I-J . A)�w,h'� ��' � �'o,�o;�;�,✓�L Cly, GvE G�JavI�O cSti��G3-s� ,�yc�� rl��-' ye ji /3b >7�s PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO. : ZOA 92-0003 FILE TITLE: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. APPLICANT: Planning Department OWNER: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 REQUEST: A request to ammend section 18.106 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code to revise handicapped parking standards and to allow gravel parking areas in certain situations. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.22.040, 18.106. LOCATION: CITY WIDE NPO NO. : ALL NPO CHAIRPERSON: PHONE NUMBER: CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION COMMENTS ARE DUE BACK TO STAFF ON 1991. XX PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: ATTACHMENTS VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN XX NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer - 639-4171 • • NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST NPO # 7 ZOA 92-0003: REQUEST: A request to ammend section 18.106 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code to revise handicapped parking standards and to allow gravel parking areas in certain situations. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.22.040, 18.106. LOCATION: CITY WIDE. Please review the attached development proposal and comment on those items listed below which concern(s) this NPO regarding this application. This listing is a template to aid in your review of this proposal. Please let us know how you feel about this development taking place in your portion of the city. Thank You. Access To and From Site Traffic Impact Neighborhood Impact Environmental Impact COMMENT: NO COMMENT: [] signed: Date: MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Interested Persons FROM: Jerry Offer, Development Review Planner DATE: March 19, 1992 SUBJECT: Zone Ordinance Amendment ZOA 92-0003 The- Planning Division -staff proposes the following amendments to Community Development Code _Chapter 18:106 related to required parking. Proposed deletions are noted in brackets [ ] . Proposed additions are underlined. The tentative schedule for review of this proposal is Planning Commission review on April 6th and City Council review on April 28th. Disabled Person Parking -Staff proposes amendments to Code Sections 18. 10.6.020 to remove Code requirements related to disabled person parking spaces that are inconsistent with provisions of the Oregon Revised Statutes and the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. Since state and _ federal laws supersede local laws, unless the .local . laws are stricter, staff proposes that the Community Development Code simply require consistency with state and federal standards for disabled person parking rather than establishing a separate -City standard. The general terms with which describes the standards will avoid the City needing to revise the Code in the future if federal or state laws change. 18 . 106 . 020 General Provisions A. Parking Dimensions 1. The dimensions for parking spaces are: a. Nine feet wide and 18 feet long for a standard space; b. Eight and one-half feet wide and 15 feet long for a compact space; and C. As required by [In accordance with the] applicable State . of Oregon and federal standards [ , at least 12 feet wide and 18 feet long] for designated [handicapped] disabled person parking spaces. same standards required for the construction and acceptance of City streets; 2 . Off-street parking spaces for single and two-family residences shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface to specifications as approved by the City Engineer, except as noted below; [and] 3. Parking areas to be used primarily for the storage of fleet vehicles or construction equipment may be gravel surfaced when authorized by the approval authority at the time the site development approval is given. The Director may require that the property owner enter into an agreement to pave the parking area: a) within a specified period of time after establishment of the parking area; or b) if there is a change in the types or weights of vehicles utilizing the parking area; or c) if there is evidence of adverse effects upon adjacent roadways, water courses, or properties Such an agreement shall be executed as a condition of approval of the plan to establish the gravel perking area. Gravel surfaced parking areas may only be permitted consistent with the following: — a. Gravel parking areas shall not be permitted within 250 feet of any residentially zoned or residentially developed area; — b. Gravel parking areas shall not be allowed within 100 feet of any public right-of- way; and c. A paved driveway of at least 100 feet in length shall connect a gravel parking area with any public street providing access to the gravel area; d. Gravel parking areas shall not be allowed within 100 feet of any water course. 4 . Parking areas to be used in conjunction with a temporary use may be gravel when authorized by the approval authority at the time the permit is approved. The approval authority shall consider the following in determining whether or not the gravel parking is warranted: a. - The request for consideration to allow a parking area in conjunction with the temporary use shall be made in writing concurrently with the Temporary Use application; 1 ,. • i MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: N.P.O's FROM: Dick Bewersdorff DATE: March 25, 1992 SUBJECT: Proposed amemndments to temporary sign requirements The City Council is in the process of reviewing proposed changes to the Development Code's temporary sign provisions. They have continued their hearing on the matter to their April 28, 1992 meeting. Enclosed is the material that the Council has reviewed thus far. We would appreciate receiving any comments you might have on the matter. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST ffiz NPO # 7 CITY OF TIGARD ZOA 92-0001: OREGON SUBJECT: Proposed amemndments to temporary sign requiremen s The City Council is in the process of reviewing proposed ch to Development Code's temporary sign provisions. They have continued their hearing on the matter to their April 28, 1992 meeting. Enclosed is the material that the Council has reviewed thus far. We would appreciate receiving any comments you might have on the matter. LOCATION: CITY WIDE. Please review the attached development proposal and comment on those items listed below which concern(s) this NPO regarding this application. This listing is a template to aid in your review of this proposal. Please let us know how you feel about this development taking place in your portion of the city. Thank You. Access To and From Site Traffic Impact Neighborhood Impact Environmental Impact COMMENT: NO COMMENT: [] Signed: Date: 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 • COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 24, 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: March 4, 1992 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Zoning Ord. amend. PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission ZOA 92-01 recommendation Feb. 3 1992 PREPARED BY: Dick Bewersdorff DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN O REQUESTED BY: Ed Murphy ------------- -------- ---- ISS BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the City revise its temporary sign requirements to redefine the limits on temporary signs? --------------------------------- STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached ordinance. ------------ - INFORMATION SUMMARY The City receives numerous complaints regarding the tendency for temporary signs to proliferate in various commercial areas of the city. The City's -temporary sign regulations 'tend to be difficult to enforce. equitably. because they are poorly defined, unclear and conflicting.' -Uncontrolled and unenforced temporary signs create a visual blight- on the community. As a result, amemdme`nts are being proposed to -the temporary sign -provisions of the Development Code (Ch. 18.114.100). The amendments should assist in .providing equal opportunity for each business to utilize temporary signs (one business in.a shopping center can .effectively monopolize all of the 70 square feet now allowed) ; eliminate some of -the clutter caused by the uncontrolled use orf temporary signs, clarify the rules, eliminate administrative cost and .simplify enforcement. The proposed changes include: limiting temporary signs to a period of 30 .days (now 60 with - continuous renewal) three times per calendar year;- allowing one temporary sign per business rather than the four now allowed; limiting.the area of temporary signs to 24 square feet -(now 70 square feet for rigid signs and 30 square feet for each banner and wall sign) ; requiring a permit for each temporary sign to allow for better tracking and efficient enforcement instead of having the first sign permitted without a permit; eliminating the distinction of a temporary, rigid, freestanding sign by classifying all temporary signs together; eliminating the duplication of lawn signs listed twice under 18.114.060; providing for real estate signs not classified as a lawn sign; providing for an exemption -for temporary real estate lawn signs from the 10 day removal period; and specifying that temporary signs be removed 10 days after the election to which they pertain. Copies of the proposed changes were sent to a subcommittee of the Chamber of Commerce's Public Affairs Committee_ The one response received was positive_ The Planning Commission recommended .the attached ordinance. The only change the Commission made from the staff recommendation to them (attached) was to reduce the size of temporary signs permitted from 32 square feet to 24 -square feet. Staff concurs. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 1. Change the Development Code as summarized above. 2. Retain the Code as is and require permits for all temproary signs: 3. Change the Code to eliminate regulations of temporary signs.:: 4. Change the Code to prohibit temporary signs. S. Retain the Code as is except for limiting the square footage of temporary,: rigid, freestandings signs per business rather than per premise_ FISCAL NOTES There is some potential for minor increased revenue because of the number of temporary signs without a permit. (Temporary sign fee is now $10 per sign.) 4brT�t.s= � `,�•� S MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Division - DATE: January 22, 1992 SUBJECT: Proposed Amendments to Development Code Pertaining to Temporary Signs OVERVIEW Summary: The City receives .numerous complaints regarding. the tendency for temporary signs ,to proliferate in various commercial areas in the city. The City's temporary sign regulations tend to be difficult to enforce equitably because they are poorly defined, unclear and conflicting. Uncontrolled and unenforced temporary signs create a visual blight on the community. As a result, amendments are being proposed to the temporary sign provisions of the Development Code (Ch. 18.114.100) . The amendments will assist . in providing equal opportunity for each business to . utilize temporary signs, eliminate some. of the clutter caused the — uncontrolled use of temporary signs, eliminate competition for the 70 square feet of temporary,rigid, freestanding shopping center signage now allowed, clarify the rules, eliminate administrative cost and simplify enforcement. Policy Implications: Should- the City .revise .its temporary sign requirements to redefine the limits on temporary signs? Financial Impact: There is some minor potential for increased revenue because of the number of uncontrolled, temporary signs with no permit. (Temporary sign fee is now $10 per sign. ) There should also be a savings due to an increase in the effectiveness .of enforcement_ Recommendation: It. is recommended . that the .Development,: Code Chapter 18.114.100 be amended to: limit the number of temporary, signs per business to:one with a maximum of 32 square. feet -of area;, require a permit for=;.allraemporary:,.signs, :<-:limit '-temporary-;._sign permits to be issued'-.for periods-- no.—'.—longer.than 30'days;,and�.for maximum of three-periods per: calendar..year; -include.: all=temporary ,-_ signs (banners, rigid;-: wall)'-to be;within'. the same-classification ANALYSIS Background The City continually receives complaints regarding the proliferation of temporary signs as well as its attempts - to equitably enforce the existing regulations. The code now allows four temporary signs per business, but only 70 square feet of temporary, rigid, freestanding sign space per premise (shopping centers and multiple business locations) . The first of the four temporary signs is allowed without a permit. All others are required to apply for a permit. Since temporary signs can be renewed after 60 days, they become almost "permanent" . In shopping centers and multiple business locations, one business can monopolize the allowed temporary, rigid, freestanding sign space (70 square feet allowed) by continually renewing an existing permit. They can effectively freeze out other businesses in the same location from having a temporary rigid sign. This has- created considerable discontent among businesses in the same center when the city attempts to enforce the temporary rigid sign limitation. In sign code enforcement, where there area number of temporary rigid signs, the City .cannot determine whose sign is the ::first "free" temporary sign to be allowed -versus those that must be removed. Enforcement requires clearly. defined provisions and administrative efficiency -to be effective. Summary of Proposed Changes o Limit temporary sign permits to a period of 30 days (now 60) three times per calendar year o Allow one temporary sign per business rather than the four now allowed and the 70 square feet of rigid sign per premise o Limit the area of temporary signs to 32 square feet (one- half a standard 4x8 plywood sheet per face -- now 70 square feet for rigid signs and 30 square feet for each banner and wall sign) o Require a permit for each temporary sign to allow for better tracking and efficient enforcement instead of having one sign permitted without a permit o Eliminate the distinction of a temporary, rigid, freestanding sign by classifying all temporary signs together; banners continue to be included o eliminate the duplication of. lawnsigns listed twice under 18 . 114.060 (Sign Exemptions) o provide for real estate signs not classified as a lawn s ign o provide for an exemption for temporary real estate lawn signs from the 10 day removal period o specify that temporary political signs .shall be removed ten days after the election to which they pertain Alternatives 1. Change the Development Code as summarized above. This will increase accountability, simplify the process, limit temporary signs, and provide an equitable opportunity for each business to utilize temporary signs. 2. Retain the Code as is and require permits for all temporary signs. This will improve tracking but will not eradicate conflict in shopping centers and multiple business locations. 3. Change the Code to not, regulate temporary signs. This will eliminate enforcement problems but would appear. to be counter to the City's efforts .to improve aesthetics. 4. Change the Code to not allow temporary signs. This would be simple to enforce but may prove. difficult for business. 5. Retain the Code as is except •for limiting the square footage of temporary, -rigid, • freestanding signs - per business- not premises. This would add to the proliferation of temporary signs and aesthetic problems. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON • SORDINANCE NO. 92- AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REPEAL VARIOUS PROVISIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO TEMPORARY SIGNS (CH. 18 . 114. 100) ; BALLOONS (CH. 18. 114 .090) ; SIGN EXEMPTIONS (CH. 18. 114.060) ; AND DEFINITIONS 18. 114.015. WHEREAS, The City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its Community Development Code periodically to improve the operation and implementation of the Code; and WHEREAS, The City of Tigard desires to eliminate unclear and conflicting provisions relative to temporary signs; WHEREAS, The City of Tigard Planning Commission reviewed the staff recommendation at a public hearing on February 3, 1992 and voted to recommend approval of the amendment to the City Council; and WHEREAS, The City Council held a public hearing on March 24, 1992 to consider the amendment. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Community Development Code shall be amended as shown in Exhibit "A" . Language to be added in UNDERLINED. Language to be deleted is shown in (Brackets] . This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 1992. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: This day of , 1991. Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 91- Page 1 f)dhibit A 18. 114 .015 Definitions 52. Temporary sign - any sign, "A" board frame, banner, lawn sign,. or balloon which is not permanently erected or permanently affixed to any sign structure, sign tower, the ground or building_ [ and which is not an electrical sign or an internally illuminated sign or one with changeable message characteristics: ] [a. Temporary Rigid Sign - a temporary sign, other than a lawn sign, made of rigid materials such as wood, plywood, plastic. See Subsection 18.114.100.C; ] [b- ]a. Balloon - an inflatable, stationary temporary sign anchored by some means to a. structure or the ground. Includes simple children' balloons, hot and cold air balloons, blimps and other dirigibles. See Subsection 18.1.14.090.C; [c. ]b Banner - a sign made of fabric or other nonrigid material with no enclosing framework. [See. Subsection 18.114.100.C.5; and] [d- ]c. Lawn Sign a freestanding sign in residential zones which is exempt from sign permit requirements provided the size requirements in Subsection 18.114.060.B.2 can be met. 18 . 114 .060 Sign Exemptions A. The following signs and operations shall not require a sign permit but shall conform to all other .applicable regulations of this chapter and the provision of Subsection (B) below: [1. Signs of a temporary nature which meet all of the following criteria: [a. There is no more than one temporary sign on the premises; for each temporary sign in excess of the one exempted sign a temporary sign permit shall be required as provided in Section 18. 114. 100; ] [b. Wall signs or wall banners which do not exceed a total of 30 square feet in area in commercial or industrial zones, or] 1. a. Lawn signs which do not exceed .the maximum allowable area on one premise regardless of the number of signs as follows: (i) a total of 12 square feet in single family residential zones; (ii) a total of 24 .square feet in multi-family residential zones_ [and_; ] [c. The temporary sign will be erected for a period no longer than 60- days; ] 2 . Signs not oriented or intended to be legible from a right-of-way, other property, or from the air; 3. Signs inside a building, except for strobe lights visible from a right-of-way, other property or from the air; 4 . Painted wall decorations; 5. Painted wall highlights;. [6. Lawn signs; ] 6. [7. ] Signs affected by stipulated judgments to which the City is .a party, entered by courts of competent jurisdiction; 7 . [8. ] Directional signs; 8. [9 . ] Interior window signs; • • 9 . [ 10. ] Nothing in this title shall prevent the erection, location or construction of directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to direct pedestrians or vehicular traffic while on the parcel of real property on which the signs are located. No sign permit or fee shall be required for such signs; and 10. [11. ] Nothing in this title shall prevent the erection, location or construction of signs on private property where such erection, construction or location is required by any law or ordinance, nor shall any public agency or utility be prohibited from erecting signs on private property when otherwise permitted.. No sign permit or fee shall be required for such signs. B. All signs exempt from permit requirements under. Subsection A above shall meet the following requirements: 1. The sign shall be erected on private property with the consent of the lawful possessor -of the property and shall not be placed on utility poles or in the public right-of-way; and 2. At least one sign shall be permitted per parcel of land; additional signs on such parcel shall be spaced at least 50 feet apart in residential zoning districts and 30 feet apart in nonresidential zoning districts. C. Signs exempt from permit requirements except those pertaining to the. sale of real estate under Subsection 18. 114.060.B shall be removed within- 10 days of their initial display. Temporary political signs shall be removed within 10 days after the election to which they pertain. D. The sign . permit provisions of this section shall not Apply to repair, maintenance, or change of copy on the same sign (including, but not limited to the changing of a message on a sign- specifically designed and permitted for the use of changeable copy) , or unlawfully erected or maintained signs. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 88-20) 18. 114 .090 C. Balloons 1. One inflatable stationary balloon or one cluster of childrens' balloons firmly [tied down] secured shall be allowed only if all of the following conditions are satisfied: a. A City of Tigard sign permit is obtained for each; b. Each owner or legal occupant of property or a building shall be allowed one balloon per year; C. A .balloon sign shall be allowed to remain up for a period of no longer than 10 days per year; d. A permit issued for a. balloon will. serve as one of the three sign permits allowed per business in a calendar year. [d. ]e. Balloons may be permitted as. roof signs with a City sign permit. The size of a balloon shall not exceed 25 feet in height; and _ The balloon shall be [tied or mounted] secured to a structure on the ground and shall not be allowed to float in the air higher than 25 feet above the nearest building roof line. 18. 114 . 100 Temporary Signs A. Authorization ` 1. The Director shall be empowered to authorize temporary signs not exempted by Section 18.114.060. The Director shall attach such conditions to the issuance of a permit for a temporary sign as may be necessary to ensure discontinuance of the use of the sign in accordance with the terms of the authorization, and to ensure substantial compliance with the purpose of this title. B. Issuance Authority 1. The Director may issue temporary sign permits which shall terminate within [60] 30 days from the date of issuance; and 2 . No permit shall be issued for a period longer than [60] 30 . days, but a permit may be (renewed] reissued by the Director. .[upon a showing of good cause for the continuation of the temporary. permit. ] for two additional permit periods (30 days each) per calendar year. 3 . Temporary real estate: signs not classif.i_ed as lawn signs, shall be limited to one sign totalling not more than 32 scruare feet per street frontage.. Permits may be issued for periods of not longer than 60 days and may be reissued upon a. showincr of good cause. C. Types and locations of temporary signs shall be .as follows: 1. The total number . of temporary signs shall not exceed [four] one for any [one] use at any one period ..of time; such signs are not permitted for single family and duplex dwellings. 2. The total area of a. (freestanding temporary rigid signs] temporary sign [on one premise] . shall not exceed 24 square feet and no more than -12- square feet per face; such signs are not permitted for single family and duplex dwellings. The permitted. area for a banner shall be no more than 24 square feet per face with the total sign area not to exceed 24square feet. [a. 32 square .feet in residential zones; and b. 70 square feet in all other zones; ] 3. See Subsection 18.114.015.C.'52, Temporary Signs, for types approved. 4. Non profit special event banners_ to be hung across. public right of ways may be permitted by the City Manager's designee. [4. Temporary wall signs shall not exceed 30 square feet in area; ] [5. Banners: a. Banners may be allowed as temporary signs provided they meet the dimensional requirements for temporary_ wall signs (30 square feet maximum area) and a sign permit has been granted where required; and] - [6. ]4. A balloon as provided in Subsection 18 .114.090.C. D. Location shall be as approved by the Director. E. Attachment: . 1. Temporary signs may not be permanently attached to.• . the ground, buildings or other structures. [F. Temporary Sign Summary: _ LAWN SIGNAGE * TEMPORARY RIGID SIGNS (exempted) * (with permit) Total Area Number -Spacing * Total Area Number Spacing Single 12 sq ft No limit 50 ft * 32 sq ft Up to 4 N/A family * Multi- 24 sq ft No limit 50 feet* 32 sq ft Up to 4 N/A * Other N/A N/A N/A. * 70 .sq ft Up to 4 N/A (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 88-20)] db/Tempsign