Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
05/19/1987 - Packet
BUDGET COMMITTEE AGENDA MAY 19, 1987 1 . Call to Order & Roll Call: uc;` ✓ David Funk _✓_ Floyd Bergmann Judy Christensen Susan Mueller _ ,/ Joyce Patton �— ; Tom Brian _ ✓ _; Carolyn Eadon _ ✓ Jerry Edwards ✓ Valerie Johnson ✓ ; John Schwartz �s �l'�. ✓��+ ., � �-, jaw: �,��, 9�rs. 2. Follow-..-up, Jill Monley: F q..y two ar r Y, o Capital Outlay Priorities & CIP list o Radio Communications Summary o FTE Comparisons o Professional Staff Projects Time Budget o Budget Trend Summary 3 . Add/Drop Nominations, Judy Christenson: Police Library ,def Social Services o Community Services o Community Development o Policy and Administration o General Government o Debt Service o CIP and Contingency 4. Add/Drop Recommendations, Judy Christenson: o Revenues o Expenditures 5. Motion to recommend 1987-88 Fiscal Year Budget as amended by the Budget Committee of $__Ly"34"P' 4/;;20 Motion to recommend 1987-88 Tax Levy of $2,098,441 and Bond Debt Levy of $118,000. 6. Budget Calendar Discussion and Adjourn: o June --- City Council Adoption o. November - Capital Finance Workshop o January - Council Goals Workshop o February - Supplemental. Budget, 5-Year Plan Update, and FY 1988--89 Budget Guidelines WL:s b/1541W I::II'Y 1'1GARD UL1'lUll[,C'll {A 7.-{l{t 1'AU T'I OI rll ll'1 AV RY f1F UDUT'MFN'I' uunonaa-n UNIT CAPITAL DESCRIPTION .m�m�®......: mnmmyas:a---VERT CL_E_5.��w..MOFSILE9f I'•OR'T'Ak3LELLUISPATL"HCCTV. --------------------------�.---------------,.----a.oam®mom----maw:.::. ---------------- PAOIO RADIO 1=0SIT ION SYSTEM POLICE -------- ------ - -____- --------- 1110 3349 Jq"'4P0 1004 2265 1120 62626 -%dTQ6b 5951 10675 1130 4859 1}16�'D 1004 3775 i140 21171 td16o0 16171 5000 ---------- ---------- _•-- _ __ --------- TOTAL POLICE 92005 37800 8119 24915 - 16171 5000 0-25 MOBILE TEAMINAL FILE SYSTEM COMM SERV AD --------- --------- 1200 U 1210 2600 2600 ' 1220 U 1230 0 1240 0 1250 7000 7000 1300 0 _________ _________ --------- TOTAL CS 9600 2600 7000 WII_I TERM BOOK LIGHT" PENS COLLECT LIBRARY _________ _________ 1400 66600 11600 55000 TOTAL LIB 66600 11600 55000 BLU PRINT DUMP TRUCK STREET TRUCK MISC PATCH 7'RK TRUCK MOWERS UTILITY ENGINE COMPACTER RADIOS POLE AEREATOR REPLACE 10 YDS SWEEPER 1 TON UNDER 1000 HOT BOX 3/4 TON TRATI.OR ANALYZER SHED IMPRV COMMDEV _________ _________ _________ _________ ------------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- 2010 0 2200 0 2220 0 2230 0 2240 2500 2500 2110 0 2120 46150 37500 22150 1500 5000 2130 121700 12500 70000 18200 21000 2140 48100 15000 10000 14000 APOO 3500 2400 2130 12650 12850 ___ ___ _________ _________ _________ _.____-_-_ _____-___ _-___-___ ____-____ _________ _____----._____--_- _____ _____ _____ -_-- _-_- __-_ TOTAL CD 231300 2300 50000 70000 33200 2150 21000 10000 14000 3200 12850 1500 5000 3300 2400 B-25 WORD PI40C TERMINAL TERMINAL CITY ADM ._.________ ______—_ 3200 4000 2600 1400 ---------- _________ --------- TOTAL ADM 4000 2600 1400 BURR 207 PRINTERS REPLACE DISK DRIVE W/P CABLE GEN GOVT _________ _________ --------- 4100 15400 12000 3000 400 --------- ---------- _________ _________ TOT GEN GOVT 15400 12000 3000 400 TOTAL CITY ®�941a90.5 1 r CITY OF "TIGARD _ ADDITIONAL REQUESTED CAPITAL OUTLAY 1967•-66 BUDGET UNIT TOTAL ADD VEHICLE CAMERAS RECORDERS MISC DICTAPHON CHAIR/ REQUESTED CHARGER PHONES 'TYPE REPLA POLICE ---------- --------- ----------- _________ _________ _________ 1110 6000 6000 _. 1120 2154 1075 1064 1130 24646 12000 12646 1140 2773 1673 1100 TOTAL POLICE 35576 10000 1075 1()64 12646 1673 1100 COMM 5ERV AD 1200 1210 1220 1230 _ 1240 1250 1300 TOTAL CS TOTAL ADD ADD BOOK MISC REQUESTED COLLECTION .: 'LIBRARY _________ _________ ______ --------- 1400 45400 x5000 400 ---------- TOTAL LIB 45400 15000 400 - TOTAL ADD REPLACE THEODOLITE YARD SHEDS EXTEND A COMPACTOR 3/4 TON VEHICLE REQUESTED COPIER STATION IMPROVNTS HOE KIT PICKUP SERV TRUCK COMMDEV --------- ____ ________ _________ _________ --------- --------- --------- --------- 2010 0 2200 0 2220 0 2230 3000 3000 2240 0000 0000 2110 10500 0000 2500 2120 36000 30000 6000 2130 13000 13000 2140 10000 10000 2150 22000 22000 --------- ---- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- TOTAL CO 102500 3000 0000 0000 2500 30000 6000 23000 22000 �. i CITY ADM I 3200 TOTAL ADM ~ 'TOTAL ADD B 25 B 25 PRINTER W/P TERM REQUESTED POLICE PW OPERAT B 25 FLOAT ADM GEN GOVT 4100 161,00 6300 6500 1400 2200 TOT GEN GOVT 16600 6500 6500 1400 2200 v TOTAL CITY 200070 ^ f'. t MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and City Council May 13, 1987 f/ FROM: Randall R. Wooley, City Engineer/iPV SUBJECT: Streets CIP As requested, attached is a copy of the list of 41 potential projects which I ' suggested in January for consideration by the Transportation Advisory Committee. My hand—written notes indicate- the status of the projects. The list is not a complete inventory of. Tigard's transportation needs. It was intended only as a starting point for developing the priorities for the Street CIP for the coming year. /br319OP Page 1 r SOME TIGARD TRANSPORTATION NEEDS (not in any order of priority) 1. Main Street, pavement reconstruction. t'.,k2. Durham Road (Hall to 99W), widening and revised vertical alignment. 3. 72nd Avenue (Hampton to 99W), widening and revised vertical alignment. .c4. 72nd Avenue at 99W, intersection improvements. 5. North Dakota street (Tiedeman to 121st), add shoulders for bike/pedestrian safety. 6. 121st Avenue (North Dakota to Walnut), widening. 7. Bonita Road (72nd to Hall), widening and revised vertical alignment. 8. Tiedeman Avenue (tigard Street to Fanno Creek), add shoulders for bike/pedestrian safety. 9. Greenburg Road (99W to Cascade Avenue), widening. x:10. Greenburg Road at Tiedeman, add southbound right—turn lane. *11. Greenburg Road at Center Street, intersection improvements. 12. Greenburg Road at Cascade Avenue, intersection improvements. 13 . McDonald Street (Hall to 93rd), widening and revised vertical alignment. 14. McDonald Street (93rd to Hwy. 99W), widening for bike/pedestrian safety. 15. 79th Avenue (Bonita to Durham), widening and revised vertical alignment. 16. 69th Avenue at 99W, intersection improvements. 17. Improved street name signing at major intersections. --k* 18. Hall Blvd. at Bonita Road, intersection improvements . 1 19. Durham Road at Hall, intersection improvements.(�(�t�fb���y«� /'lcjlif- >�t�✓✓� /<r<IG� �'�/��/ 20. Main street at Burnham, intersection improvements. 21 . Main Street at Commercial, intersection improvements. 22. Commercial Street (Main to Hall), widening and pavement reconstruction. .: 23 . Durham Road at Hall Blvd. , intersection improvements.(i%�<«� 24. Fanno Creek bridge replacements hof- North Dakota Street, Tigard Street, Tiedeman Avenue, Grant Avenue, Main street, Bonita Road. ;<25. Ash Creek/Greenburg Road bridge replacement. *26. 99W (Gaarde to Bull Mtn. Road), intersection improvements. :k ac 27. Hall Blvd. at Hunziker and Scoffins, intersection improvements. **28. Hall Blvd. at Sattler, intersection improvements. 29. 92nd Avenue (High School to Cook Park), improve sight distance and provide pedestrian/bike path. 30. Pfaffle Street (78th to Hall), widening and pavement reconstruction. 31. Hunziker at 72nd, intersection revisions to better accommodate turning trucks. 32. Walnut Street at 99W, intersection capacity improvements. *33. Study (with ODOT) the need. for an additional access to Tigard Triangle . from Hunziker Street. 34. Murray Blvd. , extension to Gaarde Street. 35. Rubberized railroad crossings at Main Street and at Bonita Road. 36. 68th Parkway (Hampton to 66th), pavement reconstruction. 37. Ash Avenue (Hall to Burnham), complete missing connection. %WI 38. Ash Avenue at 13740 SW Ash, complete missing pavement and curb. 39. Burnham Street (Hall to Main), widening. 40. Add ramps from southbound 99W to CBD at Commercial Street. 41 . Connection between Hunziker Street and Hall Blvd. per Comprehensive Plan. RRW:bs2850P f/1Cffj�JCd b4tdt1L�� 'K �f2t�ly+4il�L�iGIG�i�1 ;-1��1{ i� C{�L: ,T�.t'C .'16a✓'GIriG� LJ C��tt� It i� -��..� U�c�T1 � -- ✓�u a� �'its}�, I�i�n y ��'c r s «+i b 4J •:?/ - �,v�e ed����i --40d;►� ,nay y�� ��Va,I? et �"5 ,�o� - ' jk'Le �"� �7 �.n��dlee,� tu�`11 �a,•cr���e �zi5 �7v�-e���,"�I �[n4rVt�, MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Bob Jean \\ May 19, 1987 � — FROM: Jill Monley \� SUBJECT: FTE' s and Population I heard many comments Tuesday night regarding staffing levels and concern over the total number of staff in Tigard. The data shown below is taken from the 86/87 Salary and Fringe Benefits survey of Oregon Cities, Counties and Special Districts put out by the Local Government Personnel Institute. W/O Fire EE/Pop Population HE @ 20% (W/O fire) Klamath Falls 17, 100 231 185 1 92 Lake Oswego 23,704 225 (85) 248 1 95 Portland 366,000 4,233 3,386 1 108 Astoria 9,998 105 84 1 119 Bend 18,450 175 140 1 131 Eugene 107,000 1,013 810 1 132 Salem 103,980 937 (+61) 750 1 139 °fru Oregon City 14,440 124 99 1 145 Beaverton 33,500 282 226 1 148 Forest Grove 11,919 101 80 1 149 Ashland 15,200 126 101 1 150 Roseburg 16,025 130 104 1 154 Newberg 11,400 73 + 73 1 156 Tigard Requested 23,334 145 145 1 161 Hillsboro 30,332 170 (+62 pt) 186 1 163 Albany 27,900 206 (+22) 165 1 169 Tigard — 87-88 23,334 135 135 1 172 Medford 41,975 302 242 1 173 Springfield (No 40,850 287 225 1 181 water, parks rec.) Tigard Existing 86/87 22, 134 120 120 1 184 (Projected out FTEs) Tigard — LGPI 20,000 84 84 1 238 Average 1 141 `JM: sb/1496W PROFESSIONAL STAFF BUDGETS TIME BUDGET 44w> PROFESSIONAL STAFF PROJECTS CA CD CAS LB PD COUNCIL GOALS: o Transportation Plan/Program 80 1,500 40 80 o Community Involvement System 40 120 300 20 20 o City Center Plan 80 1,000 20 20 o Comprehensive Plan Streamline 40 1,000 20 20 o Sanitary Sewer Master Plan/CIP 40 1,200 20 o Economic Development Action Plan 80 1,000 20 o Storm Drainage Master Plan/CIP 40 1,000 2.0 o Municipal Services Policy 1.20 100 80 40 40 o Sign Code Update & Enforcement 20 60 40 o Annexation Policy Update 80 _ 160 120 _20 40 SUBTOTAL GOALS 620 7,680 640 80 260 COUNCIL POLICY STUDIES: • 5—Year Financial Plan & Staffing Plan 80 ( ) 60 80 20 40 * Service Level Priorities Plan Review 40 ( ) 20 20 10 20 • Street Lighting Program & Funding 20 2.00 40 * Streets CIP & Funding 20 500 o Court Study 20 240 40 o Personnel Rules 40 20 120 10 10 • Intergovernmental Relations Admin. 100 400 100 60 80 o ' abor Relations & Negotiations Strategy 20 10 160 10 10 otter District Offices/Shops & Comp Plan 10 40 o Council "Capital"/Council Time Management 10 10 o Council Compensation/Flexible Benefits 10 10 o Employee Compensation/Benefits Review 10 40 o Training/Travel Policy 20 o Civic Center Project Review/Litigation 2.40 80 * Park Plan & CI:P Funding 40 120 ($) 0 9-1-1 Emergency Communications 40 160 o Non—Remonstrance Policy & Half Streets 20 80 o Leron Heights Sewer Contract 40 o Fire Service Topic/Study? 80 ($) o Boardsmanship Training/Fanno Crk. Conf. 80 o Dispatch Contract 20 _ 40 SUBTOTAL STUDIES 820 1,570 880 110 440 ADMINISTRATIVE PROJECTS: 0 135th/Murray LID 40 160 ($) o Dartmouth LID 80 300 ($) a Island Annexations 10 40 20 o NE Metzger Annexation 20 ( ) 80 80 o Bull Mountain Urban Services Study 500 ( ) 160 80 o Merit System Review 80 160 a Intergovernmental Fanno Creek Plan 2.0 80 o Capital Finance Plan 80 80 160 o Walnut Annexation Study 10 ( ) 40 80 o ' tive Plan/County Contracts 80 160 ovaWnior Center/TCYS/Chamber Leases 10 80 o Solid Waste Franchise Rates 10 80 PROFESSIONAL STAFF PROJECTS CA CD CAS LB PD C. 'CLS Governance - 20 200 a Ttetirement Systems Review 10 10 80 10 20 o Special Assessment Fund Study 10 80 o Fees & Charges Review 80 ( ) 2.0 o Project MIS System 10 40 120 o Computer Master Plan Implementation 10 20 40 10 20 o Codification Update 20 160 o Phone System Review 80 o Copier Costs Review 10 80 10 10 o Development Services MIS 80 o Fleet Management System 10 120 10 10 o Metzger Park Contract 10 40 _ SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS ADMIN. 1,080 1,440 1,410 30 60 TOTAL PROJECT HOURS .2.540 10,690 2,930 420 M FTE/PROJECT HOURS 1 .25 5.5 1.5 .20 .75 DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL FTE/PROPOSED 3 52 23 .5 12 42.25 % TIME ON PROJECTS 42% 11% 7% 2% 2% % TIME ON FUNCTIONS 58% 89% 93% 98% 98 6*mwt ADMINISTRATION: POLICY STUDIES COUNCIL/ CITY TOTAL Staff Time Use Budget & SPECIAL COMMUNITY ADMINISTRATION/ PROJECTS RELATIONS OPERATIONS City Administration (Hours) 700 860 1,040 2,600 (90) (27%) (33%) (40%) 100-125% Assistant to CA (Hours) 800 —0— 240 1,040 (%) (77%) (23%) 100% Admin. Interns (Hours) 1,040 —0— —0— 1,040 (%) (100%) 100% Executive Secretary (Hours) 200 1,500 380 2,080 (%) 100% O Interns. . . ($) Assumes Consultant time in addition. . . sb/1538W I�tII� I� I ■ I I I I I I■ , ��' 6L illi H1 ■I IIH I 1In III I &11 1■ I■11u1 s _ . � :�1�1 �l■ 1■1- ■I 1111 Inl I� !� 111 I■1 :y .._ � � �:_. .� �...�!rh!�.�. !lllllH■I �! ������'. ■I 11�- !1!11!l'!�I/ 1�■! -��! 111■I■1!� ,. , I■ � �■■iirn I IMO. IIIII�JA�".-'.� ,�1�y� I■111�� III 111■�I ��'�" �% o1■I 111 IIHIiim�1�► ■ I III■ /1.JILtifu - - fl�+lit+:',,1�■■I■n� ■ I �c■' II II '� '' y NIi■ IH�■I 111 MIN Illnlll■IIIIIIII■IIIIII `■1►�':'IZ-� 1 .11111■��; � J/Z"' '!�" '�'�'''"' e '�1111■IIIIIIII■I 1 III H IIm■■I ®■I . �li.a �.�iCy.J. 1!!! t. ✓ii►d� .....rail, I ,� Illc■I �_,`' '■! 11111■1 IIIr1111111� I� � � ■i� 1111 I ■in11■1111111■I Il: 1 Ilm I ■■I _ � �='�HIII■III■HI■1■G!�'1�1�1l�!I�1�� 1!1 '!II!'�111■�I 1 ■I� -��1 I 11■111_�111■!li� 1■I � I ul■II■ I I ■1 112.4231:101,11 . .ill ■�1111�IL1o!11.x_7. 1_s_'_�'IS HIM Illlllll■_IIIIII�I■_II_�I_II_I_I_■_I 11 -�I�___m�I��11111�I_ ■I IIIIIIII■I■IIII� IYsE.NO 23mm �1�6�111�' ` !��'� 'i iI X111■Il 1111 1■liHl■1111111■IIIIIIII■I 1111■1111111■11111H1■I 1�■I■1 !!!11111■I■11111!!�_,:�!� �!1■IIIIIIII■���11!!��!;�111111■IIIIIIII■1111111■IIIIIIII■IllIP21- 11 �.��11111■1.1111■11111111■11111111■18111■■111■ 11111■IHlllll■Ii-IlIi11■Illnllll�: in��■�illllll■Ill 118.11 IIIII■IH llH■Ilmi�aalHllll■I IIII Illlllll■IHlllnulllll■■I� �I 1 ,SHm■I1111111■I■1111■. HIIII■IIIIIIII■II 11■I Hlil■1 111■IIIIII0 IIIIIIII■I In I■IIHI■11111■■III■■■I■1 .� ;' �. �.�,� , ^ �, ,..•I �'�. , 1►'���' �! 1i11■IIIII ■I■HIII■Il11, 1 .. " lP.- all■I��t�►/A -.11 �►G�2120,01z- ■ 111�I�u��1E12"bilf ' ..11�■IA_ O L�►s ,I IF I �= i�, ., �■�!�I s3aslop. : .!��I �1l11111■IIIIIIII■I11111111111111111111111111111■11 1111■I�II��i1 ��11�1��■� �iH■I■1111 ■IIIIIHI■I■H�■I■1■■� ,.���_���illll _, �.,. Illlllll■IIIII111■IIIIIIII■! 1111 "IIlilc � 1'!I•! ���IIIc��l1�11111■loll llll■11111111■IllHlll■!Iila,oil loll llll■Illlllll■III■■■I�■ .� ►. • "Illllll .��1�HI1111��a■.a��a�l■.�IIIII■�����I�a■i1�! 2111 �1C11l111��'3`► � �' � � .. I■� I�0 a, O :,�lls�/�Iji \'HSI ■ � 1: � � '�����111■11p111�11111111■IIJIIIIII■IIz��.�J..�rv��1 �1�I�Z "�„111���■i■■��aaa.����aa■e.aa�na■i����a■ i Kill . . _r•aeW •, _;, f lll� Ifs.., r �z��� ral!! Illhs.l�,�;�� _,.,�_.� Lf�I��rII�A1C..J�, ,.111. ��..��_!►,..1 _ �, _.���_�.�_�. IIHIHI■Illlllll■IIHIII�■Ilmlll■I■IIIH■IIIIIIH■II 111■Ioillll■IIIHI■ I■nlll■IlHllll■I 1� IImHI■Ilm■■I■n■■I ■ IIIIoil■IlnllH■I■11111.1■1111■;1111111■■11111■II■111■IIin111■II■ m ■I■H I ■ IHI■Ilmlll■I■1Ill■1111111.1■11111■II III■I. 11111■11111 ■I■11111■IIIIIIII■I■INO I■HHI■I■H I 1 f - :' a X11 II��l1'��''- Ill■I' IWO."O "'I<� '"''�" 1■ IIIIIIII■111111■■I■H �'•�1■ Ilc■��li?�! r��': ,-, ,_ I,i �r 511.1 �� %!u��/_�/na�L� �i'�M ��n�.�'a �� �i„ :! �:= �1 �P !� IIIINII■IIII I �" Wl■! ' I1 111"l'lh l� �'�h MINE �!!■11 ■IlHrlll■IIHIIII■I 111 IHIHI■Ilm ■I■■ • I _.,. .�.��:�►��� .. , 11 vel■1110 ■I� ��1F,�.11l■IIHIIII■I■11111■I■Illi■11111N1■I1111a1a■i�����■��II��1■Ii1N ■I■HI�■11H1111■ � III I�1�l !IHlli IN 11111 1111■111rINNIb11111n11 111■11 �1■I■Hm11■IIIf1111■IlrNall■I�In ■I�1■�II��Ir11 X11111 1 ■ r� ,.:r lw III■Ilnhl■I MID1n■I ■l■l lH®IIHI■®Illlrltl I! I!!!! I■Illll■■lHH■■I I ■ �1!!' !�IIIIIr I "���11'-��l�Illr �"'!!'Illlllll■I 1�•:'?'! "'1. ■I■1111■11■IH■11111111 IllIIIIHI■111H■■1 0 No ■ � �Jil��"i�I► � �Lrr a�f �l •I .�_ ', _ I <,.,1111■Illll ��r 11111�► :aa� �ru�■t11111111ii� It H■1 ON ■1■1�1111■IIHIIII■I ■ 111.111 11111 1 <<� .. ,,,. . ■IIII 111■I� � �� I � 1� !%IIIIH■I Z'�'1"� I l�l�l- E, 'mi1I 14,369 �1aOil ln■I HI■ loll HI VIII I!PH ��s �1��,,1�'M�'ll 1111■I�III 11■I 1111■11111OEM o���1r ■I� ���a �i a� � I■1� lilll 1■I 1 IIIHI m � ��.NN� •� , ��.� .: ,, �� -r�l� . 1 I 1 VIII ■I II .�Zcz•��• �:��11.,.�1�lG � IIG� � � I. III ■I 111 I' yq, ■I I IH■11.1111ImIl"llum11 I 111■VIII 1■I■11 I 1■■IIIIII111.1■HHI 11 ■ I - •_ !�. '�! !!l■IIIIIHI�: Film ■llHlnl■I■11111■I�111�� ?�'� ? 1■I■HIN■IllHlll■I■l�Hl 1 ' •1n■II ■Ilm■■I ■■ Initials Date -- '------ — -- Prepared By -- — — --- ------- Approved By 1 2 3 4 S 6 {�G�'—,-��✓ �vl�� �.11�'k.�i /f I��k�i iia _ T_ ,� �klA�v_(, AT 3 3 — -- - - " -- - I 5 7 7 - - - - - - . ..J 1 4-1-- 110 _ 12 1 ~ 13 14QgrQ -- iE LI _I 14 AV - — f 15 c� 15 16 16 17, _tf L_ - 17 18 '.' f - s �! 8 19 - -�- --I-- -- �- I I - -- - { --}} 19 nFT it 20 c c�, f� l 20 I 21 22 /q22 24 24 25 5 I I ; 26 �/ — - -- — -� --- - 26 27 //Q>, f� j 27 28 29 30 31 i131 33 1133 34 _ I' }--�135 1'34 i 3 £v3 .� 76` 361 ^ - - - - - - — 36 370�`i4NSL - — --- - - - -- -- �_ 37 38r-_.1� 4�'7 L- - -- - --- - 4 - - -- 38 -- -- - - �` 39 39 66 40 r'4'i .�L f 0 i - r 42 t41 41 7�_ t 44 r 1 ` i 4 -1 f_ 46r�s"c� ------ --------_ Initials Date i ----------- Prepared By ---- --------- -- -- - ------- -- �PDro d Bd By 2 3 4 5 6 v - or ` S .KTYCZ I� I II 21 Ut 2 3 /n /} - - - 3 - � 4 5 /�, 2 D '� 0 - 5 6 6 7 �. - d 7 8 ` _ l 8 10 110 12 13 - - - - - 1 r �D 3 1 - NY 14 15 �(12 r 15 16 —-------- - - -- -- -t-- ---- f 16 17 17 -I - - 18+ 18 I � 19 l19 20 --�-I- �20 21 it I _ - 21 22 23 ------- +� - 23 24 -- ------- --- -- I 24 25 At--th 25 26 I j 26 27 ---- 27 28 --- 1 28 i 29 30 --- - - - - ---� - I -- 30 31 I _lj_ 31 ----- - - -� r -- --- I -- 32 32 - ----- -- - -- - - I i --- 33 33 - - - -- --, -- -- -- - r rt- - - -- IF --- - - _ -� - 34 35 r � � 34 35 35 I I I iTT ' - -- -- - -- - _ - -' - -- -- -- 36 31 ------- -- - -- - - - - - -- -- 31 38 ------ ----- ------- - -I- -I-F -- - r-} .-_ - _ - - -- i - 138 39I 9 I II 40' � I I -- 40 41 t - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - 1 I , I 42I _ 42 -------------------- - 43 --- -- ------- 43 444 5 ------------ -1 1 i 44 1 1 � � 45 41 1474906 BUFF - 8906 GREEN - 4206 WHITE .___ MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Budget Committee May 19, 1987 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrato d SUBJECT: Budget Trends Summary At our last meeting several percentage trend numbers were flying around. Some apples—to—apples comparisons are as follows: Last Year to 1986-87 1987-88 % Next Year Budgeted Proposed Change Staff:Population 1: 171 1: 176 — 3% Population 20,500 23,300 + 13.6% Assessed Value* $957, 116,868 $1, 163,744,970 + 21.5% Operating Budget Per Capita $263 $2.85 + 8.7% FTE (6/30 Bodies) 120 135 + 12.5% Total Budget $13,349,804 $14,348,400 + 7% Operating Budget costs per capita and staffing are at or below real population growth rates and about half the assessed value growth on year—to—year comparisons. Core Level I to 1984-85 1987-88 % Basic Services II—III Actual Proposed Change Staff:Population 1 :238 1: 176 + 26% Population 19,000 23,300 + 22.6% Assessed Valuations $638,100,000 $1, 163,744,970 + 38.8% Operating Budget per Capita $177 (I) $2.85 (II--III) + 61% FTE (6/30 Bodies) 80 135 + 68% Total Budget $10,455,656 $14,348,400 + 37% Comparing the two charts (Last Year/Next Year and Core Level/Basic), clearly the increase is in going from Core Level I to a Basic Services Level II—III mix, and not the relatively small increases in Proposed 1987-88 needed to sustain Basic Service levels. If the Committee wishes to reduce FTE and $ to Level II services, a 1: 195 ratio or current staffing levels would suffice. *Market inflation essentially flat or zero for period; real growth. BJ:cn/1548W Nt'als Date Prepared By 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 _ � � 2 3 ✓ — 1 3 a 4 `� r �� 5 Tl- 5 6 it 6 1 / 7 10 0 cc cm 12 ( ( " 2 00 13 3 14 a -m owo 15 5 16 ✓ LL' .. 6 17 ✓ tt 1 —Volt1L 17 18 18 19 j` Lk1 19 20 p 21 ✓ ,v f2Y 1 1 22 --— -- — 1 _ 22 23 3 24 4 25 01 V5 26 m It SAW✓ _ _ _ 6 � II 1 - - - 27 7 28 8 29 30 E' 0 31 Q _ � �i _ I i _ 1 32 _ 32 33 � LL 3 l W,6po34 1. 2 — — — 4 — 5 36 36/ 37 37 38 8 39 — 1 -- 9 0 Initials Date Prepared By Approved By 1 2 3 4 5 6 Aker # ti% 72PI1,17 Awllo"r 2 AF Ot�n✓G - L -- ! 2 3 3 1 _ 4 4 �� � it 5TAkk � IrAE 5 l 6 - -- —' - -- - -- -�- 6 fi- s 1 s 9 7 -- j 9 I L 10 0 I I 12 - -- - - 2 I I 13 3 14 _ 4 mm 15 Ce.P, 0 15 16 1 6 17 14I - z• 17 18 -- - _l 1ldi—118 19 19 20 0 21 I 1 1 22 _ - -1L 1 2 23 - 3 24 4 Ll 25 25 26 — i 6 27 - --�- I -� - - —F-1 -- —�- -- 7 28 1 8 29 1.. _ 9 3031 0 I _L- l. 2 33 33 34 4 35 5 36 �. _ 6 37 7 381 LL —� - 8 39 - 9 40 j 0 Initials Date Prepared By AOprove0 By 1 2 3 4 S 6 1i 2 f/ il flet =� j _ _�_ 2 3 le -_ L ✓ -j j j - 3 4 - - 4 1 5 II jl 5 6 6 $ 8 9 I I j II: I 9 to I 2 Io 13 13 mm oo SS 14 4 15 j 15 16 - - - 1 6 17 1 - -- ' 1 L -- 1 17 Hl 18 18 19 — _ 19 20 j 0 21 11 1 22 --ILL 1 _L1� 2 23 3 24 } I 4 2s i II 5 26 27 7 28 I �I — - - ( 8 29 L 1 �111 L j 9 30 0 311 _ 32 33 3 34 — - - -1 �- -- 4 35 5 36 ' 37 � 7 38 8 39 g 40LLE L=1�1- 11:11 0 i Initials Date Prepared By - Approved By 3 1 , C(J .(J S _ 4 ✓ n 014 j 6 I --� I — -- 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 ( IAz 12Y' 0 11 ✓o r✓ rw _ U 1 12 - 12 13 3 c 14 iIGTI( U - 1 -- — 4 c0v m°O 15 #a .� -� -- --- 5 16 6 17 — 17 dC - 18 19 / 19 20 0 21 ( 1 22 _ 2 23 -- -- -- s I I� . 1 _ � v I ,}v U 123 24 4 25 -" +. 5 26 6 27 -11' I .p 1 28 � L I L /P C� – �–j 8 _ I 29 -- A, 30 S 3 0 31 of 1 32 i 1__ 2 33 I --- -- -- I � � - . 3 34 ) -A: – 4 35 5 36 1_ _ 6 `�rrr 37 – 1 7 38 Clan t © 8 39 9 40 j t 0 I � I MEMORANDUM CITY OF 'TIGARD, OREGON TO: Budget Committee May 19, 1987 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: Parks SDC Fund PARKS SDC NW SE 'TOTAL 7/1/86 Beginning Balance 56,862 56,863 $113,72.5 Revenues thru 4/87 20,000 48,517 68,5.17 ' S-T Revenues 76,862 105,380 $182,242 Expenditures thru 3/87 43,663 49,200 92,863 April Expenditures -0- -0- -0- S-T 4/30/887 $33,199 $56, 180 $89,379 May & June Revenues ^6,000 6,000 12,000 S-T Balance $39, 199 $62,180 $101,379 Picks Landing Trail 8,751 8,751 Cook Park Dock 9,000 9,000 Jack Park RR Demolition 2,200 2,200 Jack Park Backstop 2,800 2,800 Cook Park Pump House 5,000 5,000 Woodard Park Bridge 10,000 10,000 Signage 2,500 2,500 5,000 EFB 6/30/87 $21,699 $36,929 $58,628 Beginning Balance 7/1/87 $21,699 $36,929 $58,628 1987-88 Revenues 30,000 30,000 60,000 Interest Earnings 2,000 2,000 4,000 Revenues 1987-88 $53,699 $68,929 $122,628 Projects 1987-88 40,000 50,000 90,000 Maior Equipment 13,000 17,000 30,000 Ending Balance 6/30/87 $ 699 $ 1,929 $ 2,62.8 * Subject to final adjustment by Finance BJ:bs1563W µ MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Bob Jean, City Administrator May 15, 1987 FROM: Wayne Lowry, Finance Director SUBJECT: Budget Summary Publication Deadlines Chapter 11 of the Budget Manual for municipal corporations describes the publication requirements. We must publish the budget summary and notice of budget hearings not less than 15 days and not more than 25 days prior to the date of the meeting. In order to achieve the optimum notice to the public, the budget summary must be to the Tigard Times on Friday, May 22, to be published on May 28, exactly 25 days prior to the budget hearing. It would, however, be possible to submit the budget summary to the Times on May 29 to be published on June 4. This would give notice to the public 18 days prior to the hearing which is not as desirable but is within the ' requirements. WL: sb/1541W MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON likw TO: Budget Committee 5/ 19/87 Date FROM: Community Development/Operations SUBJECT: Capital Expenditure Requests The following information is to obtain a better understanding on purchases requested by Community Development . The information will address Operation Section . 2 . 1 .2 Wastewater , 2. . 1 . 3 Streets and 2 . 1 .4 Parks . The capital expenditures requested by each Section will be shown for : 1) Safety 2) Production 3) Utilization of Personnel The following equipment and vehicles will be covered : Extend-A-Backhoe Wastewater 2 . 1 .2 Page 1 10yd Dump Truck Wastewater 2 . 1 .2 2 Street Sweeper Street 2 . 1 . 3 3 Asphalt Hot Box Street 2 . 1 . 3 4 1 Ton Utility Truck Street 2 . 1 . 3 5 1 Ton Flatbed Dump Parks 2 . 1 .4 6 3/4 Ton Pick-Up Streets/Parks 2 . 1 . 3/2 . 1 .4 7/8 Turf Equipment Parks 2 . 1 .4 9 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Budget Committee 5/ 19/87 Date FROM: Community Developfnent Operations/Wastewater SUBJECT: Backhoe Equipment requested is needed to carry out the following programs : Open Ditching- presently sharing the use of the street dept . backhoe which causes problems in both wastewater and streets because of scheduling con- flicts , especially in the summertime . Under present situation we can anticipate only approximately 4 ,000 ft . of ditches to be dug, of the 56 miles of ditches . Sanitary And Storm Sewer Repairs- like the open ditching program this pro- gram is affected by having to borrow the use of the street dept , backhoe . Once again , we have scheduling conflicts because we try to do our repairs in the summer when the ground water table is down . If the request for the extend-a-hoe is approved we are able to reduce the area of concern for safety by having 4 ' additional reach . This would enable us to either not have to work in a hazardous situation or to ex- tricate ourselves from working in a hazardous situation more quickly . An example of this would be working on a slope . Productivity is increased by 15-20% in time savings in set up time . Having greater reach allows for less moving of the backhoe to perform it ' s function . 1 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Budget Committee 5/ 19/87 Date FROM: Community Development Operations/Wastewater SUBJECT: 10 Yard Dump Truck/Open Ditching Program We are presently using a 1978 International 5yd . dump truck. This truck was purchased used in 1983 . The truck at this present time runs satis- factory. Our problem in regards to our programs is related to it ' s haul- ing capacity . When you have a 3 man crew running your ditching program you have a backhoe operator , a dump truck driver and a man in the ditch or a flagger depending on circumstances . This means that each time you fill the 5yd, dump you have to shut down the job while that truck is hauling to the dump . This allows for slack time for 2 personnel while awaiting for the return of the dump truck. Which often times means at least 45 minutes to l hour for each 5yd . load . When we are at the dump we are charged for a 10yd . load, although we are only dumping 5yds . I believe that we would be able to get from 25% to 50% more productivity " in our program by having the lOyd. dump as compared to our 5yd . dump truck Our overall effectiveness and efficiency in both the ditching , sanitary and storm sewer repair programs would be enhanced by 25% to 50% . Also there is some cost savings involved by hauling our own rock rather than having it delivered as we presently do . Approximately $30 . 00 per load savings . The present 5yd . dump truck could be used as a trade in towards the lOyd. dump truck or kept as a back-up (because there have been times when more that 1 truck was needed) or possibly sold to the Parks Dept . at a future date . The proper course of action is one which I feel could be determined at a future date . 2 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AMW TO: Budget Committee 5/ 19/87 Date FROM: Community Development Operations- Street Section SUBJECT: Street Sweeper The following description of work programs , equipment used and the need for new equipment is as follows . The street sweeper presently sweeps 87 miles of streets , in 13 areas , 6 times per year. Each entire sweep of the city takes approximately 18 days . New development and annexation will increase these totals . Sweeping miles and broom down miles are not the same as street miles . The same 87 street miles converts to 438 sweeping miles and 286 broom down miles . Given this information , Street miles per year is 522 , Sweeping miles is 2 , 628 , Broom down miles is 1 , 716 and 108 days to complete the work program. 1) Vehicle now used is a 1979 Mobile Sweeper . This unit was purchased used at $43 ,200 . 00 in 1979 . 2) Condition of existing unit is that it requires repairs at a high rate to enable sweeping program to be completed. It is presently in the shop for hydraulic system failure . Estimated cost is approx- imately $2 , 194 . 47 . 3) There is a need to replace this unit for safety , cost effectiveness and utilization of personnel . Cost of a sweeping unit is $70 ,000 . 00 . The existing unit will be used for back-up only . 3 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON `err TO: Budget Committee 5/ 19/87 Date FROM: Community Development Operations/Streets Section SUBJECT: Insulated Hot Box For Patch Truck The street section currently has a 1985 GMC patch truck. Holding capacity is 4 tons of asphalt . This unit does not have the ability to keep asphalt hot. This causes poor utilization of personnel , equipment and material waste . During winter months patching costs for 1 ton of asphalt to be placed is approximately $145 . 00 . Only 2 tons can be utilized before the remaining mix becomes cold. The new unit would keep all 4 tons hot until needed, up to three days . This would allow for better use of materials and labor, also allow us to plan for work on days when the source plant is closed. Emergency repairs can also be addressed if left over mix is in the unit. Annual goals indicate.Q' 352 tons of patching material . The mix which becomes cold is used for shoulder repairs and operations yard surface . Complete utilization of all 352 tons would allow all $8 ,800 . 00 of asphalt fir✓ to be used for maximum benefit , patching pot holes . The unit cost is $21 , 000 . 00 , therefore , over a 5 year period the cost of the unit would be recovered . 4 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Budget Committee 5 / 19/87 Date FROM: Community Development Operations/Streets Section SUBJECT: 1 Ton Truck The street section currently has 2 pick-ups . A 1969 3/4 ton chevy with 110,430 miles and a 1978 1/2 ton chevy pick-up with 60 ,400 miles . These two pick-ups are used to transport personnel , materials and supplies to and from job. sites . There are seven work programs in the street section . 3 to 4 of these programs are operating at the same time . With such limited transportation available it is difficult to respond to any type of emergency or situtation during the work day . Condition of existing vehicles is that they require a high level of maint . and repair. The 1978 1/2 ton pick-up is currently in the shop for steering column repairs . Parts are being shipped from Detroit . This takes away 1/2 of the street section transportation for personnel to job sites . ,yam,;. The need for a 1 ton truck is for safety , work program and utilization of personnel . A fully equipped 1 ton truck is $18 ,200 . The existing 2 units will be kept . 5 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON wrr TO: Budget Committee 5/ 19/87 Date FROM: Community Development Operations/Parks Section SUBJECT: 1 Ton Flatbed w/Dump Hoist The parks section presently has 2 pick-ups . A 1968 chev 3/4 ton with 185 , 381 miles and a 1978 chev 3/4 ton with 61 ,300 miles. These two pick-ups are not adequate to keep up my present programs . The 1968 cannot handle heavy loads or pull much of anything at all . The 1978 truck can pull an equipment trailer but , does not have the load capacity A 1 ton truck could increase productivity by as much as 50% for the following reasons : 1 ) Can pull a larger trailer , which allows more equipment to get to the field at the same time . 2) The hauling capacity is greatly increased which means less trips to the dump area. 3) This means one person dump trips instead of two . No hand unloading . This vehicle allows for more efficient debris hauling all year round. This vehicle would cost 16 ,500 . 00 . This does not replace any vehicle . 6 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T0: Budget Committee 5 /22/87 Date FROM: Community Development Operations/Streets Section SUBJECT: 3/4 Ton Pick-Up The street section currently has 2 pick-ups , a 1969 3/4 ton chevy with 110,430 miles and a 1978 1/2 ton chevy pick-up with 60 ,400 miles . These 2 pick-ups are to get the street crew members , materials/supplies to and from job sites . There are 3 to 4 work programs operating at the same time . With two existing pick-ups being used by the street personnel , that leaves the street crew chief without any transportation . This severely limits his ability to check on work being done in the field , line out work to be done , supply materials as needed at the job sites , investigate request for action , respond to emergencies or situtations that need his immediate attention . Cost for a 3/4 ton pick-up is $13 , 000. 00 . All existing pick-ups would be kept . 7 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON '�rry TO: Budget Committee 5/ 19/ 87 Date FROM: Community Development Operations/Parks Section SUBJECT: 3/4 Pick-Up The parks section presently has 2 pick-ups . A 1968 chev 3/4 ton with 185 , 384 miles and a 1978 chev 3/4 ton with 61 ,300 miles . These 2 pick- ups are used full-time by the crews . Truck No . 011 ( 1968 chev) is not safe to pull equipment or for heavy loads Floors are presently held to- gether with old street signs and crack sealer . This vehicle has seen better days . It needs to be put too use by the caretaker . Who by contract is supposed to have some sort of vehicle to use for parks clean up work. In the parks section we use community service work quite ex- tensively . Approx . 6000-7000 man hours a year , of which 3000-4000 comes with their own crew leader and transportation . The remainder comes through our doors and I have to get them to the field . Quite often we waste alot of time shuttling people to and from job sites . With both trucks being so extensively used by the crew it also leaves me as crew chief no way to get around and inspect the parks for possible safety problems as well as just not being able to adequately keep the flow of personnel , supplies and equipment going . I am not able to inspect the field work or respond in a appropriate and efficient manor to emergencies and request for action . 8 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Budget Committee 5/ 19/87 Date FROM: Community Development Operations/Parks Section SUBJECT: Turf Equipment Needs rhe following items will help with the efficient application of the main spring and summer function of the parks section ; mowing : 2- 36" Mid-Range Mowers 1 ) Efficiently in mowing Civic Center , Liberty , Main & Windmill . They will also allow us to be more efficient in our trim mowing area ' s where a 60." or 72 " mower can ' t get to but a 36" can . 2) Better size format for a good looking cut . 72 " Mower 1 ) Increase .mowing productivity . AVAW 2 ) Replace out dated equipment #023 which is a 72 John Deer Tractor with a 72 " belly mount mowing deck. 3) This piece of equipment 30-40% . 18 ' -20 ' Utility Trailer 1) Getting mowing equipment to parks . 2) Getting small trailered equipment to project sites . Aereator 1 ) Enhance turf quality system wide . 9 , -t �f Ax GENERAL GOVERNMENT* DETAIL 4100, 4200 04/21/87 BUDGET REVISED EST. HIGH L0W _���87 _86-f87_ 87-87 87-88 87-88 601 Professional Services 5,000 5'000 4,000 Staff T.E.A.M. Training 5,000 5'000 Misc. Consulting _____ _____ 5.808 _ ........_ 5,000 5,000 4,000 10,080 6^080 602 Contractual 0-1-1- Contract {60,008} (80,000) (60,080) 05,000 32,500 Labor Negotiations 4,000 4,000 5,008 5,088 6,080 LGPI Services 2,000 2,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 Salic -0- -0- 2,208 -0- -0- Shuck -0- -0- 1,300 -O- CATV Bargaining 3,008 3,000 5,008 5,800 5,000 Misc. --L.2}0 __............... Sub-Total 10,000 10,000 16,588 80,800 44,500 IPM & S/W License �{+� 42�72� �}�)00* 50P98* 10'000 52,750 01,500 130,000 04,500 *(12 mo. ) 610 R&M Facilities Janitorial 20,000 28,000 20,000 20,000 15,000 4,A* Supplies S��(XX) ��)00 7���80 ��0O� 25,008 25,000 25,008 27,500 20,000 612 R&M Equipment Office Equipment 25,000 25,000 10,008 10,000 8'000 DP/WP 3<5^0{X� 35�0�� 35,000 37,10k00 37,000 60,000 60,000 45,000 47'000 46,000 013 Special Dept. Employee Awards 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Wellness 5,008 5,000 2,000 5,000 2,000 Employee Events 3,{0V} 3/00V0 3,00X0 8�{XX} 3.1990- 10,000 .1{V}010,000 10,008 7,000 10,080 7,808 628 Office Supplies Postage General. 15,000 15,000 16,080 16'000 10,800 Postage Newsletter 12'000 15,000 17'000 15,008 16^000 Mino, 3'000 1,000 3,800 2,080 1^000 Letterhead 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,080 Supplies 13,{V}0 14 14 14'000 13 ,{x]0 50,000 50,000 55,000 52,000 50,008 621 Ad & Publicity Newsletter Printing 8,000 8,000 13'000 12,000 (g) 10,000 (6) NH/NPO Postcards 1,!500 1,500 2,500 2,500 (2) 1,500 (1) Ado 508 500 500 500 500 '*wChamber Directory 11.92-9 � 9P 1,229 �?QQ 11,000 11,000 10,000 16,000 13^000 04/21/87 BUDGET REVISED EST. HIGH LOW 86 87 86--87 87-87 87 88 87•--88 622 Fees & Licenses Elections 6,000 6,000 2,500 3,000 3,000 Recording f=ees 2,000 2,000 500 2,000 2,000 Annexation Fees 1,000 1,000 1,000 1.,000 1,000 Misc. 1{.-000 .1,._000 1{_000 l_,000 11.92-0 10,000 10,000 5,000 7,000 7,000 623 Dues & Subscriptions 373 Metro 10,000 10,000 10,32.7 10,600 10,600 LOC 6,500 6,500 6,300 6,500 6, 500 Boundary Commission 2,000 2,000 2,000 2, 1.00 2, 100 'Tigard Chamber 500 500 500 500 500 NW Resources/S&W 500 500 500 500 500 I._GPI 500 500 500 500 500 20,000 20,000 20,500 20,700 20,700 630 Rents & i._eases Copiers 15,000 2,280 2,000 2,800 2,800 Computer/GLO/Lease lurch, 60{000 3000 40,000 §211-00 §2_1 7,00 75,000 32,380 42,000 72,000 72,000 631 Utilities Water 15,000 15,000 7,000 8,000 7,000 Phone 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 55,000 Electric 2.9,000 29,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 Gas 10,000 10,000 8,000 1.0,000 10,000 Misc. _5 1990-0 5,X00 _5_t 000 5,000 _5,000 94,000 94,000 90,000 103,000 116,500 632 Insurance 100,000 100,000 85,000 100,000 100,000 SUB TOTAL (Non Add) (470,000) (470,000) (456,000) (595,200) (550,700) 704 Office Furn & Equip __O__ 27,500 28,2.50 32,000 1''x,400 TOTAL_ Gen. Govmt. 470,00_0 497,500 484,250 627L200 566, 100 (w/o 911) (w/o 911) (w 911) (...-65,000=) ( 65,000:=) (*562,000) (*501., 100) CITY ATTORNEY 80,000 1.20,000 1.20,000 100,000 80,000 TOTAL. -•- City Wide Support 550000 617,500 604,250 7`7..7,700 646, 100 Non-Departmental (*662,200)(*581, 100) ,4400' 1418E WASHINGTON COUNTY, COUNCIL OREGON MAE- May 4, 1987 H.W. Lyster 15625 SW Alderbrook Circle Tigard, OR 97224 Upon receipt of your letter of April 16, 1987, I contacted our Office of County Counsel . I have been informed by them that the County has no legal authority to review or take action against another municipality's financial affairs. I have also discussed this matter with the District Attorney. His office conducted investigations with an auditing firm in the past. Based upon that review, the District Attorney found no "unauthorized expenditures" and suspended any further action. Based on your letters, I must assume that you will not be satisfied with this response. However, based on the information provided me by the District Attorney and County Counsel , I must conclude that Tigard's appropriation of funds is lawful . However, you can always express yourself at any local government budget hearings on any year. This process is designed to allow citizen input and comment. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. E Bruce A. Warner, P.E. Acting Director JD c: Scott Upham, District Attorney John Junkin, County Counsel Bob Jean, City of Tigard Department of Land Use And Transportation,Administration 150 North First Avenue Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 Phone:503/648-8761 'On//-t MGMT. PROFESSIONAL FIELD ..MI CAL OFFICE ACCOUNTING POL _ DO $3_„85-$5.95/hr. o Intern o Helper o Helper __o_Off.Aide o_LB Aide 2) 980 - 1309 o OAI o LAI o Billing _ Clerk I 3) 1125 - 1503 o MW o OAII o .LAII --__ _o Billing o Scty/Clerk �. Clerk II 1157�1420 �_ 4) 1214 - 1614 o Deputy City o Eng Aide o OAIII o LAIII o Acct. Clerk Recorder 5) 1266 - 1688 o UWI o Code Enfo. o OAIV o LAIV o Sr.Acct.Clerk Asst. 6) 1303 - 1737 o Eng Asst/ o Dispatcher/ Draftsman_ Clerk 1397-1716 7) 1364 - 1818 o Exec. Scty. o UWII o ET I - o Data Entry Spec./ Programmer, o Equip. Srvcr. 8) 1460 - 1948 o Crime Prev. o UWIII o Insp. I("C")� o Librarian I o Mechanic o Planner 9) 1677 - 2099 o Office/WP Mgr. o Librarian II o ET II _ o Rec/Court Mgr 10)1802 - 2252 �.. o Insp. II("B") o Police Officer 1846-2267) 11)1875 - 2345 o Assoc. Planner II o Corporal o Asst. Librarian _ � (1936-Q80_)_____ 12)1948 - 2440 o Crew Chief o Surveyor o ET III ........ o Insp. III 13)2040 - 2550 o Admin Asst. o Sergeant (2078-2551) �-__ 14)2190 - 2740 �o Acct. Mgr. o Sr. Planner o Asst. to CA ------------- 15)2286 - 2880 o Bldg. Official o Proj . Engr. o Sup. Sv._. _Mgrso Personnel Mgr. 16)7.450 - 3050 o PW Opns. Mgr. o Lieutenant o DV Svcs. 17)2755 - 3430 o City Engr/Dep.Dir�y� •�� �. �� _____._� �•T ��� o Finance Dir. o i..ib,ra-y Dir. 18)3015 - 3745 o Police Chief o CS Director, o CD Director Set by Council o City Administrator Agreement cn/1430F r MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T0: Bob Jean May 1, 1987 FROM: Brian Hartung w� SUBJECT: Streetlighting/Signalization Analysis The streetlight and traffic signal cost analysis assumes that all current subdivision pre—paid items will be expended out of General Fund monies by 1988-89. Base cost factors are 1987-88 proposed budget costs and March, 1987 actual PGE billings for current street lights (see attachments) . 1. BASIC EXPENDITURE REQUIREMENTS Item Monthly Yearly SIGNALIZATION All current and contracted street signals $ 2,300 $27,600 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 100 1,200 Subtotal $ 2,400 $28,800 STREETLIGHTS (Dangerous/Hazardous $ 1,000 $12,000 intersections (50 intersections @ 2 lights each TOTAL $ 3,400 $40,800 2. CURRENT EXPENDITURE REQUIREMENTS — STREETLIGHTS A. GENERAL FUND Item Number of Units Monthly Yearly PGE Owned 571 $ 5,557 $66,684 City Owned 187 1,249 14,988 Pole Costs 220 474 5,688 Subtotal $ 7,280 $87,360 B. PRE—PAID SUBDIVISION TRUST FUND Item Number of Units Monthly Yearly PGE Owned 12 $ 101 $ 1,212 City Owned 962 5,286 63,432 Pole Costs 952 699 8,388 Subtotal $ 6,086 $ 73,032 TOTAL $13,366 $160,392 3. EXPENDITURE FORECAST (1988-89 to 1990--91) Item Number of Units* Monthly** Yearly 1988-89 PGE Owned 585 $ 5,947 $ 71,370 City Owned 1,183 6,999 83,993 Pole Costs 1,207 1,267 15,208 Subtotal 4, $ 14,213 $170,571 Signals & Maintenance*** $ 2,484 $ 29,808 TOTAL $ 16,697 $200,379 Budgeted (5-Year Plan) $ 75,000 < 125,379> 1989-90 PGE Owned 602 $ 6,423 $ 77,076 City Owned 1,218 6,833 81,996 Pole Costs 1,243 1,293 15,516 Subtotal $14,549 $174,588 Signals & Maintenance $ 2,683 $ 32, 196 TOTAL $17,232 $206,784 Budgeted (5-Year Plan) $ 81,000 <$125,784> 1990-91 PGE Owned 620 $ 6,634 $ 79,608 City Owned 1,255 7,041 84,492 Pole Costs 1,280 1,331 15,972 Subtotal $15,006 $180,072 Signals and Maintenance $ 2,898 $ 34,776 TOTAL $214,848 Budgeted (5-Year Plan) $ 87,480 <$127,368> * 3% Growth Factor (New Installations) ** 5% Inflation Factor * 3% Growth Factor Plus 5% Inflation Factor BH:cn/1367W ## PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY it #t 41 CITY OF TIGARD ACCOUNT 4-0517-6155-0 1# { i4wj PO BOX 23397 46155 1# tt TIGARD OR 97223 ## ## ## ## STATEMENT OF STREETLIGNTING FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 1987 POWER COST ADJUSTMENT THIS QUARTER ($0.0009) ## ------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------It ## BILLING WITHOUT ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL ## it NUMBER CODE DISCRIPTION KWH UNIT COST KWH PRORATES /PRORATES BILLING AMOUNT ## ##-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------#t ## COMPANY OWNED LAMPS #4 if -------------------------------------------- ## It UNITS CD10 7000L MV CONVERSION 72 $8.22 0 $0.00 $0.00 ## ## 231 UNITS CD21 7000L 175N MV DELUXE WHITE 72 $8.22 16632 $1,898.82 $1.898.82 t# ## 87 UNITS CD23 21000L 40OW MV DELUXE WHITE 155 $13.30 13485 $1.157.10 $1,157.10 It t# 20 UNITS CD24 55000L 1000W MV DELUXE WHITE 397 $28.94 7940 $578.80 $578.60 It ## 1 UNITS CD25 5800L 70W HPS G E TWN t COUNT 30 $6.10 30 $6.10 $b.10 It ## 114 UNITS C033 5800L 70W HPS 30 $6.10 3420 $695.40 $695.40 #t ## 6 UNITS CD34 9500L 100W HPS 42 $7.03 252 $42.18 $42.18 It #1 UNITS C035 16000L 15OW HPS 62 $8.48 0 $0.00 $0.00 It ## UNITS CD36 25500L 25OW t1PS 101 $11.72 0 $0.00 $0.00 #t ## 13 UNITS CD37 4BOOOL 400M HPS 158 $14.70 2054 $191.10 $3.13 $194.23 ## ## 99 UNITS CD39 22000L 20OW NPS 82 $9.94 6118 $984.06 $984.06 It #t UNITS CD46 7000L 175W MV RECT ENC SPBOW 72 $13.51 0 $0.00 $0.00 ## ## UNITS CD50 5800L 70W HPS RECT GE SPGLOW 34 $11.39 0 $0.00 $0.00 It ## UNITS CD76 95000L 100W HPS RECT BOX SEMI 42 $8.56 0 $0.00 $0.00 ## ## ## ; ISUB TOT 571 UNITS SUB TOTAL 51931 $5,553.56 $3.13 $5.556.69 ## ## It If ## ## CUSTOMER OWNED LAMPS-OPTION B t# If -------------------------------------------- ## t# 85 UNITS CD21 7000L 175W MV DELUXE WHITE(B) 72 $6.08 6120 $516.80 $516.80 It It 28 UNITS CD23 21000L 40ON MV DEL WHITE(B) 155 $11.03 4340 $308.84 $308.84 11 ## 20 UNITS CD25 5800L 70 NPS BE TWN/COUNT (B) 30 $3.88 600 $11.60 $11.60 11 ## 1 UNITS CD33 5800L 70W HPS (B) 30 $3.88 30 $3.88 33.88 #: ## 8 UNITS CD34 9500L 100W NPS (B) 42 $4.64 336 $37.12 $37.12 #' tt 4 UNITS CD35 16000L 150W HPS (B) 62 $5.85 248 $23.40 $23.40 # if UNITS CD37 48000L 40OW HPS (B) 15B $11.57 0 $0.00 $0.00 t ## 2 UNITS CD39 22000L 20ON HPS (B)_ 82 $7.05 164 $14.10 $14.10 #- ## 39 UNITS CD46 7000L 175M MV RECT ENC SPGLOW 72 $6.B6 2808 $267.54 $267.54 # ## UNITS CD58 20500L 25OW MET-HALID GAR HUB 108 $12.55 0 $0.00 $0.00 f ## UNITS CD59 34000L 40OW MET-HALID GAR HUB 16B $14.35 0 $0.00 $0.00 # ## UNITS CD76 95000L 100W HPS RECT BOX SEMI 42 $4.64 0 $0.00 $0.00 # ## UNITS CD77 95000L 100W NPS RECT BX C/OFF 42 $4.64 0 $0.00 $0.00 # ## UMTS CD78 16000L I50W HPS RECT BOX (B) 62 $5.85 0 $0.00 $0.00 # t# # ##SUB TOT 187 UNITS SUB TOTAL 14646 $1.249.28 $0.00 $1.249.28 # # ## OPTION C # ## UNITS CIRCUIT CHARGES $0.60 0 $0.00 $0.00 t UNITS CD33 5800L 70W HPS (C) 30 $1.77 0 $0.00 $0.00 f UNITS CD34 9500L 100HPS (C) 42 $2.47 0 $0.00 $0.04 # ## UNITS CD77 9500L 200M HPS (C) 42 $2.47 0 $0.00 $0.00 t If ##SUB TOT 0 UNITS SUB TOTAL 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.04 # ##----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # ####1#11rr1#r#1t#11##1#t##t#11###1#1######t##11###1#:01x11####1ttr11r1#1t###x101#####1#tr#11#1111x#t##11#r1#11##11x0#r######1#r##011# ## PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY tl ## 4-0517-6155-0 #1 -# CITY OF TIGARD ACCOUNT 'w*# PO BOX 23397 46155 #r ## ## TIGARD OR 97223 ## 1# of STATEMENT OF STREETLIGHTING FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 1987 POWER COST ADJUSTMENT THIS QUARTER 1$0.0004} I# of-------------------------------------------------------------W--------------- ---------------------------------------------------- . t# BILLING k1THOUT ADJU5ThENTS TOTAL 1# A 11 NUMBER CODE DISCRIPTION KWH UNIT COST KWH PRORATES /PRORATES BILLING AMOUNT #1 -----------------------to ---------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- It #1 POST OR POLE CHARGES ## ## -------------------------------------------- ## 7 UNITS CD01 SLO WOOD POLE 35FT OR LESS $2.58 $18.06 $18.06 #1 ## 1 UNITS CD02 ALUM POLE BILLED AS CDO) $2.58 $2.58 $2.58 It to UNITS CD06 ALUM POLE SOFT DAVIT TYPE $10.91 $0.00 $0.00 1# #1 40 UNITS CD07 PAINTED STEEL POLE 25FT REG TYPE $3.14 $125.60 $125.60 ## ## 40 UNITS CD08 ALUM POLE 25FT REG TYPE CUST $1.23 $49.20 $49.20 ## #1 UNITS CDII PAINTED WOOD POLE 35FT UG SVC $3.67 $0.00 $0.00 ## of UNITS CD18 ALUM POLE 25FT DAVIT TYPE $11.65 $0.00 $0.00 ## ## UNITS CD19 POLES MAINTAINED/GUST/NO CHS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 #1 11 UNITS CO22 PAINTED WD POLE BILLED AS CDO1 $2.58 $0.00 $0.00 1# ## 64 UNITS CD23 LAMINATED WD 20FT NO MAST/ARM CUST $0.48 $40.32 $40.32 It 14 UNITS CD24 LAMINATED WOOD POLE AS CDO1 $2.58 $0.00 $0.00 ## #1 UNITS CD25 CONCRETE POLE 35FT BILLED A5 CDOB $1.23 $0.00 $0.00 r1 ## UNITS CO26 PAINTED WOOD POLE 35FT UG SVC COST $0.47 $0.00 $0.00 to, #1 UNITS CD27 ALUM POLE SOFT DOUBLE DAVIT $10.91 $0.00 $0.00 ## t UNITS CD30 ORNA CONCETE POST 20FT CD32 $9.64 $0.00 $0.00 ## 111*0# JNITS CD31 ALUM POST 16FT NO NAST ARM $6.16 $0.00 $0.00 1; it 12 UNITS CD32 ALUM POLE 25FT REG TYPE $9.64 $115.68 $115.68 t: #1 UNITS CD33 ALUM POLE SOFT REG TYPE $10.31 $0.00 $0.00 #. of UNITS CD37 PAINTED STEEL POLE 25FT REG $12.81 $0.00 $0.00 1E 1# UNITS CD38 PAINTED STEEL POLE SOFT REG $15.87 $0.00 $0.00 If, ## 30 UNITS CD39 LAMINATE WD 20FT NO MAST ARM $3.77 $113.10 $113.10 # ## UNITS CD41 CURVED LAMINATE WD POLE SOFT $5.32 $0.00 $0.00 #° #1 UNITS C045 CURVED LAMINATE WD POLE SOFT CUST $0.68 $0.00 $0.00 # of UNITS CD46 SLO WOOD POLE-35FT-CUST OWNED $0.33 $0.00 $0.00 # 1t UNITS CD48 ALUM POLE-30FT-REG TYPE-CUST OWNED $1.32 $0.00 fO.00 1` #1 UNITS CD49 PAINTED STEEL POLE SOFT $3.53 $0.00 $0.00 1- ## UNITS CD50 ALUM SOFT DAVIT TYPE CUST $1.39 $0.00 $0.00 # to 3 UNITS CD52 ALUM POLE-25FT-DAVIT TYPE $1.49 $4.47 $4.47 # ## 3 UNITS CD53 ALUM POLE 35FT REG OR DAVIT TYPE $1.54 $4.62 $4.62 1 ## UNITS CD54 ALUM POLE-25FT-CUST OWNED $1.23 $0.00 $0.00 # ## UNITS CD57 FIBERGLASS POLE 16FT BRONZE $2.94 $0.00 $0.00 t 1# UNITS CD58 FIBERGLASS POLE 16FT BRONIE CUST $0.35 $0.00 $0.00 #. ## UNIT5 CD59 FIBERGLASS POLE 25FT BRONZE $3.86 $0.00 $0.00 # It UNITS CD60 FIBERGLASS POLE 25FT BRONIE CUST $0.45 $0.00 $0.00 t #1 UNITS CD62 FIBERGLASS 25FT-POLE $0.45 $0.00 $0.00 1 It 1 ## A # 1#SUB TOT 220 UNITS SUB TOTAL $473.63 $0.00 $473.63 1t KWH t r % BILLING BEFORE POWER COST ADJUSTMENT 66577 $7.276.47 $3.13 $7,279.60 1 #1 POWER COST ADJUSTMENT THIS QUARTER ($0.0009) ($59.92) 1 1# TOTAL BILLING FOR SCHEDULE 91 $7.219.68 # ###I####1###111111110#1###111#1#1off 1##/1x111##1##11#0###lrtttt##1100#1411t##1t1######1####t1##1off off##1111#11#1#141111###1011##10 ## PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ## ## It E# CITY OF TIGARD TRUST FUND ACCOUNT 4-0517-b15b-0 ## "Iw PO BOX 23397 48156 ## ## ## TIGARD OR 97223 ## ## STATEMENT OF STREETLI6NTING FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 1987 POWER COST ADJUSTMENT THIS QUARTER (10.0009) It ## ------------------------------------------------------------- BILLING WITHOUT ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL ## ## NUMBER CODE DISCRIPTION KWH UNIT COST KWH PRORATES /PRORATES BILLING AMOUNT ## -------------------------------------------------------------------------## ## COMPANY OWNED LAMPS ## ## ## UNITS CD10 7000L MV CONVERSION 72 $8.22 0 $0.00 $0.00 t# ## UNITS CD21 7000L 175M MY DELUXE WHITE 72 $8.22 0 $0.00 $0.00 ## ## UNITS CD23 21000L 40OW MY DELUXE WHITE 155 $13.30 0 $0.00 $0.00 #t ## UNITS CD24 55000L 1000W MY DELUXE WHITE 397 $28.94 0 $0.00 $0.00 ## ## 1 UNITS CD25 5800L 70W RPS 6 E 1WN & COUNT 30 $6.10 30 $6.10 $6.10 #t ## UNITS CD33 5B00L 70M NPS 30 $6.10 0 $0.00 $0.00 t# ## i UNITS CD34 9500L 104W HPS 42 $7.03 42 $7.03 $7.03 ## ## UNITS CD35 16000L 15OW HPS 62 $8.48 0 $0.00 $0.00 ## ## UNITS CD36 25500L 25ON HPS 101 $11.72 0 $0.00 $0.00 ## ## UNITS CD37 48000L 400M NPS 158 $14.70 0 $0.00 $0.00 41, ## 2 UNITS CD39 22000L 20OR HPS 82 $9.94 164 $19.88 $19.88 ## It UNITS CD46 7000L 175M MV RECT ENC SPGON 72 $13.51 0 $0.04 $0.00 ## ## UNITS CD50 5800L 70W HPS RECT BE SPSLOW 34 $11.39 0 $0.00 $0.00 It ## 8 UNITS CD76 95000L 100W HPS RECT BOX SEMI 42 $8.56 336 $68.48 $68.48 #t i ## # )SUB TOT 12 UNITS SUB TOTAL 572 $101.49 $0.00 $101.49 ## ## ## ## CUSTOMER OWNED LAMPS-OPTION B t# #t ## 495 UNITS CD21 70001 175M MV DELUXE WHITE(B) 72 $6.08 35640 $3.009.60 $3,009.60 it ## it UNITS CD23 21000L 40OW MY DEL WHITE(B) 155 $11.03 1705 $121.33 $121.33 ## ## 229 UNITS CD25 5800L 70 HPS 6E TWN/COUNT (B) 30 #3.88 6870 $888.52 $888.52 it It 62 UNITS CD33 5800L 70W HPS (8) 30 $3.88 1860 $240.56 $240.56 1$ ## 22 UNITS CD34 9500L 100W HPS (B) 42 $4.64 924 $102.08 $102.08 ## #: UNITS CD35 16000L 150W HPS (B) 62 $5.85 0 $0.00 $0.00 it ## UNITS CD37 48000L 400M HPS (B) 158 $11.57 0 $0.00 $0.00 #t ## 16 UNITS CD39 22000L 20ON HPS (B)_ 82 $7.05 1312 $112.80 $112.80 It ## 100 UNITS CD46 7000L 175N MV RECT ENC SPGLOW 72 $6.86 7200 $686.00 $686.00 It ## UNITS CD58 20300L 25ON MET-MID GAR HUB 108 $12.55 0 $0.00 $0.00 ## ## UNITS CD59 34000L 40ON MET-HALID BAR HUB 168 $14.35 0 $0.00 $0.00 #; ## UNITS CD76 95000L IOOW HPS RECT BOX SEMI 42 $4.64 0 $0.00 $0.00 #e ## 27 UNITS CD77 95000L 100N HPS RECT BX C/OFF 42 $4.64 1134 $125.28 $125.26 H ## UNITS CD78 16000L 15OW HPS RECT BOX (B) 62 $5.85 0 $0.00 $0.00 i ## ##SUB TOT 962 UNITS SUB TOTAL 56645 $5,286.17 $0.00 $5,286.17 # t ## ## OPTION C # #' ## UNITS CIRCUIT CHARGES $0.60 0 $0.00 $0.00 # UNITS CD33 5800L 70W HPS (C) 30 $1.77 0 $0.00 $0,00 t UNITS CD34 9500L 100HPS (C) 42 $2.47 0 $0.00 $0.00 t ## UNITS CD77 9500L 20OW NPS (C) 42 $2.47 0 $0.00 $0.40 # ##SUB TOT 0 UNITS SUB TOTAL 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 t ##---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t ######11###1######1fill###11#1#11#111###till 1#1#1#1#1##11########lit#1###111#1Iflttt#####1##1#1#t##1##II##111###tilt##tit 11#1#1##11##1# I# PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY it 1# It +# CITY OF TIGARD TRUST FUND ACCOUNT 4-0517-6156-0 11 PO BOX 23397 46156 ## 1# TIGARD OR 97223 tt #1 #1 1# STATEMENT OF STREETLIGNTING FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 1987 POWER COST ADJUSTMENT THIS QUARTER ($0.00091 ## #1----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1# 1# BILLING WITHOUT ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL ## ## NUMBER CODE DISCRIPTION KWH UNIT COST KWH PRORATEG /PRORATES BILLING AMOUNT ## ##----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------## 1# ## ## POST OR POLE CHARGES 14 ## ------------------------------------------- ## if 2 UNITS CD01 SLO WOOD POLE 35FT OR LESS $2.58 $5.16 $5.16 ## It UNITS CD02 ALUM POLE BILLED AS CD01 $2.58 $0.00 $0.00 ## It UNITS CD06 ALUM POLE 3OFT DAVIT TYPE $10.91 $0.00 $0.00 1# ## 61 UNITS CD07 PAINTED STEEL POLE 25FT REG TYPE $3.14 $191.54 $191.54 #1 ## 38 UNITS CD08 ALUM POLE 25FT REG TYPE COST $1.23 $46.74 $46.74 ## 1# UNITS CD11 PAINTED WOOD POLE 35FT UG SVC $3.67 $0.00 $0.00 If It UNITS CD18 ALUM POLE 25FT DAVIT TYPE $11.65 $0.00 $0.00 #1 ## UNITS CD19 POLES MAINTAINED/CUST/NO CH6 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 It ## UNITS CO22 PAINTED ND POLE BILLED AS C001 $2.58 $0.00 $0.00 .41 t# 605 UNITS CD23 LAMINATED WD 20FT NO MAST/ARM COST $0.48 !290.40 $290.40 1# ## UNITS CD24 LAMINATED WOOD POLE AS CD01 $2.58 $0.00 $0.00 1# #1 UNITS CD25 CONCRETE POLE 35FT BILLED AS CD08 $1.23 $0.00 $0.00 1t ## UNITS CD26 PAINTED WOOD POLE 35FT UG SVC COST $0.47 $0.00 $0.00 1# ## UNITS CD27 ALUM POLE 3OFT DOUBLE DAVIT $10.91 $0.00 $0.00 41 tom,, UNITS CD30 ORNA CONCETE POST 20FT CD32 $9.64 $0.00 $0.00 1# ## UNITS CD31 ALUM POST 16FT NO MAST ARM $6.16 $0.00 $0.00 11 ## UNITS CD32 ALUM POLE 25FT REG TYPE $9.64 $0.00 $0.00 ## ## UNITS CD33 ALUM POLE SOFT REG TYPE $10.31 $0.00 $0.00 11 It UNITS C037 PAINTED STEEL POLE 25FT REG $12.81 $0.00 $0.00 I# #1 UNITS CD38 PAINTED STEEL POLE 3OFT REG $15.87 $0.00 $0.00 1# ## UNITS CD39 LAMINATE WD 20FT NO MAST ARM $3.77 $0.00 $0.00 ## #t UNITS CD41 CURVED LAMINATE WD POLE SOFT $5.32 $0.00 61.88 ## .60 #1 #t 91 UNITS CD45 CURVED LAMINATE NO POLE SOFT COST $0.68 (61.88 $ 0 $ ## UNITS C046 SLO WOOD POLE-35FI-COST OWNED $0.33 $0.00 $0.00 1# #i UNITS CD48 ALUM POLE-30FT-REG TYPE-COST OWNED $1.32 $0.00 $0.00 #1 ## UNITS CD49 PAINTED STEEL POLE SOFT $3.53 $0.00 $0'60 1t ## 7 UNITS CD50 ALUM SOFT DAVIT TYPE COST $1.39 $9.73 $9.73 ## I# 1 UNITS CD51 STEEL POLE 25FT DAVIT EX HVY STRAIN $2.70 $2.70 $2,70 #1 ## 5 UNITS C052 ALUM POLE-25FT-DAVIT TYPE $1.49 $7.45 $7.45 1# if UNITS CD53 ALUM POLE 35FT REG OR DAVIT TYPE $1.54 $0.00 $0.00 1# ## 3 UNITS CD54 ALUM POLE-25FT-CUS7 OWNED $1.23 $3.69 $3.69 It ## UNITS CD57 FIBERGLASS POLE 16FT BRONZE $2.94 $0.00 $0.00 11 ## 100 UNITS CD58 FIBERGLASS POLE 16F1 BRONZE COST $0.35 $35.00 $35'00 1# #1 8 UNITS CD59 FIBERGLASS POLE 25FT BRONZE $3.86 $30.68 $110.88 it t# 27 UNITS CD60 FIBERGLASS POLE 25FT BRONZE COST $0.45 $12.15 $12.15 1# #1 4 UNITS CD62 FIBERGLASS 25FT-POLE $0.45 $1.80 $1.80 #1 1# If #1 ## $699.12 $0.00 $699.12 IS ##SUB TOT 952 UNITS SUB TOTAL 7 87 KWH 13 G, A BILLING BEFORE POWER COST ADJUSTMENT 57217 $6,086.78 $0.00 ' $6,086.78 #'_ #1 If51.50> i. QUARTER t$0.0009I 11 POWER COST ADJUSTMENT THIS 0,035.26 I= ## TOTAL BILLING FOR SCHEDULE 91 ##IiIII##It####$ti#1#1##t#tl##tt###I#.#########1#t#11t#I##t##t#1#fill#I#t1111111##411ttt##t#I##########tilt##I####I#########l##111111#I' Portland General Electric Company Fourth Revision of Sheet No. 91-1 P.U.C. Ore No E-13 Cancelling Third Revision of Sheet No. 91-1 SCHEDULE 91 STREET AND HIGHWAY LIGHTING SERVICE TO STREET AND HIGHWAY LIGHTING AVAILABLE In all territory served by the Company. APPLICABLE To lighting service for public streets and highways, and public grounds and areas, supplied to municipalities or agencies of Federal or state govern- ments where funds for payment for electric service are provided through taxation or property assessment. CHARACTER OF SERVICE From dusk to dawn daily, controlled by a photo-electric control or time switch to be mutually agreeable to the Customer and Company. MONTHLY RATE FOR STANDARD EQUIPMENT The following monthly rates are for Company-approved streetlighting lumi- naires. Option A is for luminaires owned, maintained and supplied with electric energy by the Company. Option B is for maintenance and energy supplied to luminaires owned by the Customer. Option C is for the furnish- ing of electric energy to luminaires owned and maintained by the Customer and installed only on Customer-owned poles. Under normal operating condi- tions, any required circuits for Option C luminaires will be owned and maintained by the Customer. Maintenance by the Company includes group lamp replacement and glassware cleaning on Company schedule. Individual lamps will be replaced on burnout as soon as reasonably possible after notification by the Customer and subject to the Company's operating schedules and requirements. Nominal Monthly Monthly Rate Type of Light Watts Lumens kWh Option A Option B Option C Incandescent* 92 1 ,000 32 $ 4.96 $ 3.53 $ 1 .84 182 2,500 64 6.82 5.39 3.68 300 4,000 105 9.17 7.74 6.04 405 6,000 142 11 .35 9.92 8.17 Mercury Vapor** 100 4,000 41 6.82 4.36 2.36 175 7,000 72 8.13 5.99 4.15 250 10,000 99 10.89 7.74 5.70 400 21 ,000 155 13.12 10.85 8.92 1 ,000 55,000 397 2.8.47 25.14 22.86 Sodium Vapor 70 5,800 30 6.06 3.84 1 .73 100 9,500 42 6.98 4.59 2.42 150 16,000 62 8.41 5.78 3.57 200 22,000 82 9.84 6.95 4.72 250 25,500 101 11 .60 8.14 5.81 400 48,000 158 14.51 11 .38 9.10 * No new service. ** No new service under Option A except in established residential areas in order to provide compatibility with existing light services. Issued May 15, 1984 Effective for meter readings C. L. Heinrich, Senior Vice President on and after June 15, 1984 Portland General Electric Company Fifth Revision of Sheet No. 91-3 P.U.C. OreNo. E-13 Cancelling Fourth Revision of Sheet No. 91-3 SCHEDULE 91 (Continued) MONTHLY RATES FOR NONSTANDARD EQUIPMENT The following special monthly rates, are for Company-approved ornamental nonstandard luminaires and posts. All terms and conditions included under the standard Schedule 91 tariff are applicable to these rates. Monthly Monthly Rate kWh A 5 C Special box-like enclosure, similar to G.E. "Space-Glo" 115-watt/7,000-lumen: Mercury Vapor** 72 $13.42 $ 6.77 $ 4.15 1 ,000-watt/55,000-lumen, Mercury Vapor** 397 38.47 26.56 22.86 70-watt/5,800-lumen, HP Sodium** 34 11 .35 4.82 1 .96 Special rectangular box, anodized aluminum similar to GardCo Type PW 400 400-watt/21 ,000-lumen, Mercury Vapor** 155 18.01 11 .28 8.92 Special rectangular box anodized aluminum, similar to GardCo HUB series HP Sodium Vapor * 5.99 1 .73 70-watt/5,800-lumen** 30 * 6.42 2.42 100-watt/9,500-lumen*** 62 * 7.57 3.57 150-watt/16,000-lumen * 10.03 5.81 250-watt/25,500-lumen** 101 * 13.40 9.10 400-watt/48,000-lumen** 158 Metal Halide * 10.24 4.38 175-watt/14,000-lumen** 76 * 12.42 6.22 250-watt/20,500-lumen**168 * 14.15 9.67 400-watt/34,000-lumen Rectangular Box, PGE-Approved Luminaires Only HP Sodium Vapor 100-watt/9,500-lumen 42 8.51 4.59 2.42 62 9.73 5.78 3.57 150-watt/16,000-lumen * Not currently offered. ** No new service under Option A or B. Issued April 16, 1985 Effective for meter readings C. L. Heinrich, Senior Vice President on and after June 1 , 1985 Portland General Electric Company Fifth Revision of Sheet No. 91-4 P.U.C. Ore. No. E-13 Cancelling Fourth Revision of Sheet No. 91-4 SCHEDULE 91 (Continued) Monthly _ Monthly Rate Luminaires kWh A;* B Special four-sphere cluster, similar to Sterner, Glob-Lite Star Burst ,# 75-watt/3,000-lumen, Mercury Vapor 119 16.82 10.29 6.85 Special GardCo bronze alloy 115-watt/7,000-lumen, Mercury Vapor 72 * 6.93 4.15 70-watt/5,000-lumen, N.P. Sodium 30 * 4.87 1 .73 Special acrylic sphere 400-watt/21 ,000-lumen, Mercury Vapor 155 * 12.02 8.92 200-watt/22,000-lumen, H.P. Sodium 82 * 8.03 4.72 Special high-intensity highway lighting luminaires maintained by Customer 400-watt/34,000-lumen, Metal Halide 168 * * 9.67 700-watt/40,000-lumen, Mercury Vapor , 272 * * 15.66 1 ,000-watt/90,000-lumen, Metal Halide 393 * * 22.63 1 ,000=watt/130,000-lumen, H.P. Sodium 399 * * 22.97 * Not currently offered. ** No new service under Option A except in established residential ' areas in order to provide compatibility with existing light services. Monthly Posts Rate 18-ft. aluminum cruciform post, to go with Type PW 400 luminaire, including investment and maintenance charges $ 8.09 12-ft. steel post, 4-mast-arm cluster mount, similar to Sterner post 9.68 35-ft. tapered steel post, painted, similar to PumCo tapered post: including maintenance charges only 4.20 including investment and maintenance charges 21 .12 12-ft. bronze alloy GardCo post - maintenance only 0.66 21-ft. PumCo concrete post with 8-ft. davit - maintenance only 1 .63 SPECIAL CHARGES AND CREDITS (CITY OF PORTLAND) Charge per luminaire for underground circuit installed with distribution system prior to February 1 , 1965 1 .78 Charge per luminaire for underground circuit installed with distribution system between February 1 , 1965 and December 31 , 1975 3.46 Issued April Effective for meter readings C. L. Heinrich, Senior Vice President on and after June 1 , 1985 y Portland General Electric Company First Revision of Sheet No. 91-2 P.U.C. Ore. No. E-13 Cancelling Original Sheet No. 91-2 SCHEDULE 91 (Continued) ivow MONTHLY RATES FOR STREETLIGHTING ONLY POSTS AND POLES Metal , fiberglass, and wood poles and post shall be in accordance with Company specifications: Monte Rate companyomp�any Owned Maintained Company-owned and -maintained wood, metal , and fiberglass poles and posts: Standard wood pole for overhead service, 35 ft. or less $2.58 $0.33 Standard wood pole, 55 ft. 4.90 0.63 Laminated wood pole, 20 ft. or less 3.77 0.48 Painted wood pole for underground service, 35 ft. or less 3.67 0.47 Curved -laminated wood pole, 30 ft. or less 5.32 0.68 16-ft. or less aluminum post 6.16 0.79 16-ft. or less steel post 9.88 2.76 25-ft. aluminum post 9.64 1.23 25-ft. aluminum.post, davit type 11.65 1.49 25-ft. steel post 12.81 3.14 30-ft. aluminum post 10.31 1 .32 30-ft. aluminum post, davit type 10.91 1 .39 30-ft. steel post 15.87 3.53 30-ft. post, extra heavy strain 21 .14 2.70 35-ft. metal post, regular or davit type 12.05 1 .54 35-ft. or less concrete post 9.64 1 .23 *16-ft. fiberglass pole, bronze color only 2.94 0.35 *25-ft. fiberglass pole, bronze and gray colors only 3.86 0.45 *Underground service, direct burial only. SPECIAL CONDITIONS Customer is responsible for cost associated with trenching, conduit, and restoration required for underground service to streetlighting. Unless otherwise specifically provided, the location of Company-owned streetlighting equipment and poles may be changed at Customer request and upon payment by the Customer of the costs of removal and reinstallation. If Company-owned streetlighting equipment or poles are removed at the Customer's request, a charge will be made consisting of the installed cost, less accrued depreciation and less salvage value, and plus cost of removal . This provision does not pertain to the sale of Company-owned equipment. If Customer-owned (Option B) streetlighting equipment or poles are removed or relocated at the Customer's request, the Customer is responsible for the costs associated with the change. `4@W A separate and additional charge will be made if circuits or poles have to be changed to accommodate specified or requested mounting height of street- lighting luminaires. Issued April Effective for meter readings C. L. Heinrich, Senior Vice President on and after June 1 , 1985 Portland General Electric Company Third Revision of Sheet No. 91-5 P.U.C. Ore No E-13 Cancelling Second Revision of Sheet No. 91-5 SCHEDULE 91 (Concluded) 40 SERVICE TO CUSTOMER-OWNED AND -MAINTAINED STREETLIGHTS Applicable for the furnishing of electric energy to luminaires owned and maintained by the Customer, and installed only on Customer-owned poles. The estimation of usage will be mutually agreed upon by the Customer and Com- pany. A circuit charge of 60¢ per month will be made for all luminaires for which the Company provides the circuit. Monthly Rate 5.751¢ per kWh ADJUSTMENTS Service under this schedule is subject to adjustments as specified under Schedules 100 and 104, as well as any other- applicable adjustments approved by the Public Utility Commissioner. TERM OF AGREEMENT Not less than 5 years. GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS Service under this schedule is subject to the General Rules and Regulations contained in the tariff of which this schedule is a part. VtMarch 1, 1984 Effective for meter readings ich, Senior Vice President on and after May 1, 1984 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Bob Jean May 19, 1087 FROM: Jill Monlev!�'� SUBJECT: FTE' n and Population I heard many comments Tuesday night regarding staffing levels and concern over the total number of staff in "Tigard. The data shown below is taken from the 86/87 Salary and Fringe Benefits survey of Oregon Cities, Counties and Special Districts put out by the Local Government Personnel Institute. W/0 Fire EE/Pop Population REJW/O firs Klamath Falls 17, 100 231 185 1 02 Lake Oswego 23,704 225 (85) 248 1 05 Portland 366,000 4,233 3,386 1 108 Astoria 0'008 105 84 1 119 Bend 18,450 175 140 1 131 Eugene 107,000 1,813 818 1 132 Salem 183,080 937 (+01) 750 1 139 Oregon City 14,440 124 00 1 145 Beaverton 33,500 282 226 1 148 Forest Grove 11,010 101 80 1 140 Ashland 15'200 126 101 1 150 Roseburg 16'025 130 104 1 164 Newberg 11,400 73 f 73 1 156 Tigard Requested 28,334 145 146 1 161 Hillsboro 38,832 170 (+62 pt) 180 1 103 Albany 27,900 206 (+22) 106 1 100 Tigard — 87-88 23,334 135 135 1 172 Medford 41,075 302 242 1 172 Springfield (No 48,858 287 225 1 181 water, parks rec. ) Tigard Existing 86/87 22, 134 120 120 1 184 (Projected out FTE` x) Tigard — LGPI 20,000 84 84 1 238 Average 1 141 v��' JM: ub/1490W MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Budget Committee May 10' 1987 FROM: Bob Jean, City Adminintrato SUBJECT: Budget Trends Summary At our last meeting several percentage trend numbers were flying arnund . Some apples—to—apples comparisons are as follows: Last Year to 1986-87 1987-88 % Staff:Pnpulation 1: 171 1 : 176 — 3% Population 20,500 23,300 + 13 .6% Assessed Value* $957, 116,808 $1, 103,744,978 + 21 .5% Operating Budget Per Capita $263 $285 + 8.7% FTE (6/30 Bodies) 120 135 + 12.5% Total Budget $13,349,804 $14,348,400 + 7% 'kW*W Operating Budget costs per capita and staffing are at or below real population growth rates and about half the assessed value growth on year—to—year comparisons . Core Level I to 1984-85 1987-88 % Basic Services II—III Actual Proposed Chanqe Staff:Population 1:238 1 : 176 + 26% Population 10,000 23,300 + 22.6% Assessed Valuations $838, 100,000 $1, 163,744,970 + 38.8% Operating Budget per Capita $177 (I) $285 (II—III) + 61% FTE (6y30 Bodies) 88 135 + 08% Total Budget $10,455,656 $14,348,408 + 37% Comparing the two charts (Last Year/Next Year and Core Level/Basic), clearly the increase in in going from Core Level I to a Basic Services Level II—III mix, and not the relatively small increases in Proposed 1087-88 needed to sustain Basic Service levels. If the Committee wishes to reduce FTE and $ to Level II services, m 1 : 195 ratio or current staffing levels would suffice. *Market inflation essentially flat or zero for period; real growth. BJ:on/1548W MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIQARD, OREGON T0: Budget Committee May 19, 1087 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator Qs-) SUBJECT: Parks SDC Fund \~~� PARKS SDC NW * SE * TOTAL 7/1/86 Beginning Balance 56^862 66^868 $113^725 Revenues thru 4/87 20,000 48 517 �,..�D S-T Revenues 70'862 106'380 $182^242 Expenditures thru 3/87 43,668 49^200 02^863 Picks Landing Trail 8,751 8,761 Conk Park Dock 9'000 0,000 Jack Park RR Demolition 2,200 2,200 Jack Park Backstop 2,808 2^800 Cook Park Pump House 5^000 5,000 Woodard Park Bridge 10,880 10'888 sJjLgnaqs __-�Lz ,000 ��� EFB 6/30/87 $21,699 $80,920 628 Beginning Balance 7/1/87 $21,609 $86,029 $58'628 1987-88 Revenues 30,000 38'000 80^000 Revenues 1087-80 $53,699 $69,929 $122,628 Projects 1987-88 40^000 58'000 90^000 __1-3-^0O0 -_30^9O0 Ending Balance 0/30/87 $ 690 $ 1^920 $ 2^628 * Subject to final adjustment by Finance BJ:bn1563W _ � u uAno � UNIT CAPI TAL DESCRIPTION CLES 1 110 33149 10814 2265 11,10 21 171 A,4;0 161 TOTAL POLICE 92005 31800 8119 211915- 16171 5000 B-215 MOBILE TERMINAL FILE SYSTEM 1210 2600 2600 1220 0 1230 0 1250 7000 7000 1300 0 TOTAL CS 9600 2600 7000 WILI TERM BOOK LIGHT PENS COLLECT 1A00 66600 11600 55000 TOTAL LIS 66600 11600 55000 BLU PRINT DUMP TRUCK STREET ,RUCK MIsc PATCH nw TRUCK MOWERS UTILITY ENGINE cOMPACTER mmzos POLE AEPEATOR nspL^cs 10 aa swsspsn 1 TON u°oso 1000 *mr BO« 3/,q m ' TON r"°` "m AwAL'zsp sxso z�mv COMMc=" --------- ------ ------- ----------- --------- -------- ------ --------- --------------- ----- ------ ----_- __--_— avm o aaoo o aeav v sezv v aswu eoov a000 2110 o 212046150 ar000 2150 /soo 5000 aizv 1 2170 1e500 rv000 18e00 e1000 2140 oomo 15000 10000 14000 =^"» sovo c"vv e15" __��oso ______ _______ _______ ________ _______ _______ _______ ______ __________^���� _____ ______ ______ _____ � ror^L co 231300 e500 50000 roov^ aaavv azuv 21000 10000 1`1000 aaoo 12o50 1500 uo^o s000 e^�� | B-25 WORD pnoc m- rsnmzxrsnxzwAL czry vox ----- ------ aaoo A000 a^vv 1400 / ----------- ---------- __-__- � ror°L °ox .vvo aa"o z«oo aunn 207 PRINTERS ns,L^cs os zsx onz" =p CABLE GEN =,` ______ _________ ________ *1oo 15°00 12000 x000 400 ---------- ----------- --------- _____ ror osw oovr 15Avv 1e000 nvov Aov ~~~~~~~~~ ror^^ czr, A10905 / � ` r CITY OF TIGARD ADDITIONAL REQUESTED CAPITAL OUTLAY 1987•-88 BUDGET UNIT TOTAL ADD VEHICLE CAMERAS RECORDERS MISC DICTAPHON CHAIR/ RCWUI:_STEO CHARGER PHONES 'TYPE REPLA POLICE _________ _________ ---------- -------- --------- --------- 1110 6000 6000 22 r 1120 159 :1075 1084 1130 24646 12000 12646 1.140 2773 1673 1100 TOTAL POLICE 35578 18000 1075 1.084 12646 1673 1100 COMM SEPV AD 1200 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1300 TOTAL CS TOTAL ADD ADD BOOK MI'SC REQUESTED COLLECTION 'LIBRARY 1400 45400 A5000 400 TOTAL LIB 45400 -;-50-0-0- TOTAL 5000TOTAL ADD REPLACE THEODOLITE YARD SHEDS EXTEND A COMPACTOR 3/4 TON VEHICLE ^ REQUESTED COPIER STATION IMPROVNTS HOE KIT PICKUP SERV TRUCK COMMDEV ---------- ------------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- --------- _ '2'010 O ^ 2200 0 2220 0 2230 3000 3000 2240 8000 8000 2110 10500 8000 2500 2120 36000 30000 6000 2130 13000 13000 2140 10000 10000 2150 22000 22000 _________ ____„____ --------- --------- -------- _________ _________ _________ --------- TOTAL CD 102500 3000 8000 8000 22500 30000 6000 23000 22000 �- CITY ADM 3200 TOTAL ADM 'TO'TAL ADD B 25 B 25 PRINTER W/P TERM REQUESTED POLICE PW OPERAT B 25 FLOAT ADM ,..` GEN GOVT 4100 16600 6500 6500 1400 2200 ----- --------- --------- TOT GEN GOVT" 16600 6500 6500 1400 2200 n__...... .. TOTAL CITY 200070 Y: i CITY OF TIFA RD OREGON 25 Years of Service 1961-1986 May 18, 1987 Commissioner Bureau of Labor & Statistics Wage & Hour Division 306 State Office Building Portland, OR 97201 Enclosed please find the City of Tigard's planned public improvement summary for the fiscal year 1987-88. Sincerely, Wawry Finance Director WL:ia 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 " PLANNED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY FISCA4 YEAR1987 , 198a CITY of TIGARD. PAGE 1 OF 1 (Name of State or 'Local Government Agency) Project Project Agency or Number Project Name Type Project Location Estimated Project Cost Contract Work LOBBY ACCOUSTICAL BARRIERS GENERAL CITY HALL $5,000:00 CONTRACT CUSTOMER SERVICE COUNTER If 5,000.00 to EXTERIOR LIGHTING " It 7,000.00 It SEWER MASTER PLAN SEWER 40,000.00 of OEA TRUCKLINE PROTECTION 10,000.00 it 89TH PLACE SEWER REPAIR " 89TH PLACE 10,000.00 16 INDUSTRIAL AREA SEWER CROSSING of 75,000.00 " GARRETT/99W CAPACITY IMP. GARRETT/99W 244,696.00 " GENTLE WOODS MH PROTECTION 20,000.00 " PINEBROOK/HALL REPAIRS PINEBROOK/HALL 15,000.00 It LERON HEIGHTS MODIFICATIONS ' LERON HEIGHTS 15,000.00 " 100TH/SATTLER/MURDOCK TORM DRAIN 100TH/SATTLER/MURDOCK 20,000.00 to SUMMER LAKE/ANTON PARK " SUMMER LAKE/ANTON PARK 30,000.00 of 104TH/HILLVIEW ", 104TH/HILLVTEW 70,000.00 if CASCADE AVENUE "' CASCADE AVENUE 24,250.00 " PACIFIC HWY INTERSECTIONS STREET' PACIFIC HWY. 10,000.00 'GREENBURG/TIEDEMAN TURN IN. GREENBURG 15,000.00 " DURNHAM/HALL TURN LANE " DURHAM/HALL 15,000.00 " GREENBURG/CENTER STREET GREENBURG/CENTER 25,000.00 " DARTMOUTH STREET EXTENSION L.I.D. TIGARD TRIANGLE 1000,000.00 " 135TH STREET IMPROVEMENT " -135TH STREET 11000,000.00 " ORS 279.023 generally states that not less than 30 days prior to adoption of its budget for the subsequent budget period, each Rublic agency shall prepare and file with the Commissioner of the Bureau_ of Labor and Industries a list of every public Tmprovement known to thatagency a thea enc ansofund—in the budgetperiod... I7 the agencyeci es t3— o use its own equipment and personnel or constructing projects estimated to cost more tan $50,000, the agency shall show that the decision conforms to the policy of the State of Oregon that public agencies shall make every effort to construct public improvements at the least cost to the public agency, and the public agency shall cause to be kept and preserved a full, true and accurate account of the costs of performing the work including all engineering and administrative expenses and a reasonable estimate of the cost, including investment cost, of the equipment used. NOTE: This Improvement Summary together with the project FOR14 WH — ��b ( 10/82) estimate and least cost determination constitutes a public recorUavailable in the usual manner for public review or copying. Nail a copy of this public improvement summary to: Wage and Hour Division, 306 State Office Building; Portland, Oregon 97201 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SWrW` TO: Bob Jean, City Administrator April. 28, ,1987 FROM: Brian Hartung, Admin. Analyst (Consulting) SUBJECT: 1987 Population Estimate The following is the breakdown for the 1987 population estimate. This estimate includes the recently certified South Metzger annexation. ASSUMPTIONS CURRENT EST. 5-YEAR PLAN 1986-87 Certified Population (7/1/86) 29,7 k5 South Metzger Annexation 1,250 Subtotal 22,015 Other Annexations 8 Subtotal. 22,023 WYr+' New Construction (4-1-86 to 3-31-87) (573 units @ 2.41 x .95 occupancy rate) 1,312 Total Estimated 1987-88 Population (7/1/87) 23 .3 22.7OQ Island Annexations 175 New Construction (400 units) 880 Total Estimated 1988-89 Population (7/1/88) 24.M 2A—QOO New Construction (400 units) 880 Total Estimated 1989••-90 Population (7/1/89) 2-5112-0 25.000 Metzger Annexation 5,500 New Construction (400 units) 880 Total Estimated 1990-91 Population (7/1/90) 1 .6'iO 31.000 Note: PSU population center used an average household size of 2.2 for 1986 population estimates. This included a factor for occupancy rate. If this method is used for 1987 certification for new construction, population would increase by 1,261 to 23,284. BH:sb/1335W CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON MEMORANDUM TO: Randy Wooley and Wayne Lowry March 23, 1987 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: 1986-87 CIP BUDGET AND 1987-88 BEGINNING FUND BALANCES Based on current Revenue and Expenditure estimates as of March 19, 1987, the following amounts are available for CIP expenditure in FY 1986-87 ( 1). I need to know if you plan to spend (2) LESS on CIP projects this year, and if so we can add that amount to the Ending/Beginning Fund Balances for FY 1987-88 so those. funds are available for FY 87-88 CIP projects. ( 1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Fund 86-87 CIP 86-87 Est CIP CARRYOVER EFB BFB Est. (Budgeted) (Wooley Est. ) ( 1-2=3) (3/19/87) (3+4=5) General $ 75,000 $ 75,000 0 $ 1 , 100,000 $1, 100,000 Sewer 503,000 55,750 Storm Drain 70,000 55,500 State Gas Tax 175,000 56,000 Co. Gas Tax 76,000 0 Co. Road Levy 140,000 0 Streets SDC 774,500 0 Parks SDC 153,000 0 I'll need your best estimate on what you really expect to construct through June 30, 1987 by April 1 , 1987. See me if you have any questions. Thanks BJ:mh cc: Bill Monahan Jill Monley // dZ w/3��L �//7 H /7r/✓� �fw ,fL !! �-�Ig BG-L�� G-!a7 _ --- --- ---Sr l }! "1906-87 ADOPTED BUDGET -- - 1986-87 BUDGET FTE GENERA i! _ FED REV SEWER STORM 'STATE COUNTY COUNTY STREETS PARKS BOND SPECIAL BLDG. I} CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ADOPTED . ADOPTE1 =) --_---_--------_-_--_----_-----�----',iI�II{�Ii,'it'; _ - _ _ .i�;.t!__ :I� _ 3�r�a3•383_29s045�_y7a�ys159 A_- —IIII II SH.i.,A�RI�NG:{ �t IFYUNE 1I2D�5-0_I✓'DRAINAGE �RI A �I�-N10A_G—0E0] GS�I 6_T' AXtt-GAS -ToAROAD ROA1 D$LEVY377?13SD"i C0g+�]� SOC oOE!o-BT_ S SESS• IIFIIi �U�NO POLICE *34.5 7000'1627000 - 17�NA 6,4s�v7-/QPJJ �►D0_o'I�0-_ --_- CS ADMINISTRATION •3 99989 .4000✓ oe l+ 126000✓ 49 250025,00 6-T I :-- ' _— -_�-'✓�_✓/,--✓�- — --- baFINANCE SERVICES 12 138761 oMUNICIPAL COURT 2 80000 LIBRARY 9 287000 fi ;i SOCIAL SERVICES V: