04/03/1985 - Packet CITY OF TIGARD
BUDGET COMMITTEE MEETING
Durham Treatment Plant
Corner of Hall Blvd. & Durham Rd.
6:00 p.m., April 3, 1985
6:00 1. CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL:
✓ Wally Hoffman, John Cook,
✓ Judy Christensen, Tom Brian,
Howard Duffy, Phil Edin.
, Dale Evans, Jerry Edwards,
Nick Frezza, j/ Ima Scott,
6:05 2. Follow-up information
Police Vehicle Options
Civic Center Costs Update
Fees and Charges
6:30 3. Recreation Program Service Levels, Parks and Recreation Board
(pgs. 64A & 100)
6:45 4. Policy and Issues Summary
7:00 5. Budget Committee Discussion & Recommendation
9:30 6. Adjournment
(0803F)
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIQARD' OREGON
TO: BUDGET COMMITTEE APRIL 3, 1985
FROM: PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD, JIM BLAUR0CK, CHAIRPERSON
SUBJECT- PILOT COMMUNITY RECREATION PROGRAM
The main purpose for 'the Park and Recreation Board on the above topic is to
initiate m discussion draft for the pilot recreation program and then to get a
Recreation Coordinator on City staff that would research the specific types of
recreation needs in our city . The coordinator could also, on m very limited basis,
put together a minimum of ten classes within the Pilot program period. Theme
classes would reflect the interests shown by city residents in prior surveys and
through the interest survey now being put together by the Park and Recreation Board.
The Recreation Coordinator can play a very valuable role in the city through
positive public relations that can be demonstrated in several public meetings to
draw support for the program and through the newspapers, which already back the
program arid have stated that they will do all they can to help make the program
positively publicized. The cities of Gresham and Tualatin have both hired a full
time staff, Recreation Coordinator. kIn both cities, their job in to lay the
ground work for a city-wide multi-use recreation program' as well as help find and
plan new park locations, arid to help find funding for, the Recreation Departments.
The Recreation Coordinator also in staff liaison to the Park and Recreation Boards.
The present Tigard Park and Recreation Board is working very hard to identify the
^
needs of our cities parks, an well an the needs and wants of our residents. We
have taken some of the programs such as the gift catalog, gr�ant research (State,
Federal, Private and Corporate) about an far as we can go, limited by in most
cases, our, more that full time "employment." I know the money in our budget is
very tight, but I also believe that the residents of our city will riot only
appreciate us developing a recreation program' they will help make it a ouooens'
through their support monetarily, through donation o such as fun(d) raisers and
positively supporting m Recreation levy.
Whether or not you support the levels for maintenance that we suggested on the
budget detail sheet is not important. We can adjust that budget for any level of
service we determine as a team, we can work together. I also believe in taking the
first step in budgeting the money to hire a coordinator for the pilot period, we
all will be rewarded by the positive public response to the city for initiating a
program that can be taken advantage of by everyone in our city.
I envision the Recreation Coordinator crossing paths and assisting all the
organized sports clubs and teams that take place in our city, even helping them
find additiowal funding if needed.
The Park and Recreation Board has dedicated itself to making the recreation program
a success and will help the coordinator find funding, as the program develops. The
hoard needs this full-time staff liaison to help us continue to develop and realize
our on-going programa. Within the pilot recreation period, we feel enough money
can be found through fund raising and grants to continue the coordinator' s
position, whether we decide to go for m levy or not. We feel there in a tremendous
benefit for our city, by the results and public relations that can be brought
about, through a good, solid recreation program.
07M4p
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIQARD' OREGON
TD- BUDQETCOM1ITTEE APRIL 8, 1985
FROM: BOB JEAN, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT- BUDGET POLICY ISSUES AND ITEMSv
o Should General Fund dollars be used to maintain street lighting? Or should a
Street Light Utility be considered? ($25'000 — $50,000 Policy implication in
FY 1985-86)
p Should Fees and Charges be at 80% or 100% of average cost recovery? ($50,000
Policy implication)
o How much real General Fund omoh Contingency is needed? ($50,000 — $150'000)
u May, 1986 Tax Base? (11/85 Meeting, 12/85 Ren. ' 1/86-5/86 Campaign)
m Should an Annual Street Overlay program be reestablished? ($100'000 --
$200,000
$200'000 implicationu. . . Street Lighting and Street Maintenance implication)
o Should Parks SDC funds be held and capital improvements deferred until
adequate operating and maintenance funds are available? Or, shifted to land
acquisition?
o Should Enterprise funds be charged a "rent" cost for Civic Center bond debt
shares?
o Should utility rates be based on full cost? Should the utilities be "run
like a business?"
o Should the City out local effort and subsequently get less from other
agencies (mg. W.C.C.L.B. ' Federal Revenue Sharing, Highway grants, Parks
grants, etc. )
o Should Squad Cars be rebuilt or some new vehicles purchased? ($30,000 cost)
o Should 011 funds be withheld or, set amide from T.R.F.P.D. until a coot study
and service contract can be developed?
o How much real omnh Contingency should he held in Street, Sewer, Storm
Drainage?
o Should the Civic Center Project Fund be fully charged for direct and overhead
indirect onut shares?
o Should $08,000 of Civic Center Bond Funds allocated for Debt Service he
reallocated for direct project costs? (2 year delay on Bond Debt levy
equalization. . . reduce General Fund related cost obligations)
w Should the Business Income Tax generate $100,000 above the $20^000
,
administrative cost as previously out by the Budget Committee? (20& increase)
(0782p)
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
MEMORANDUM
T0: City Council and Budget Committee April 3, 1985
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Retrofitting of Police Vehicles
ADVISOR: Mr. Howard "Bud" ASHCRAFT
P.O. Box 221
Vernonia, OR 97064
Phone: 429-6868
On April 2, 1985 I met with Mr. Ashcraft of COAMIERCIAL RETROFIT MAINTENANCE INC.
for the purpose of assessing the patrol vehicles. Overall, the condition of the
vehicles is good, considering the age and mileages.
It was determined that we currently need to have three (3) units (#7, #15, and #2)
retrofitted, and Unit #3 partly retrofitted with brakes and suspension only, as it
has a new engine. That will take care of vehicle retrofits in FY 84/85.
It was further determined that in budget year 85/86 we need to have four (4) more
units retrofitted to enable us to get into the 86/87 budget year without
purchasing any new patrol units.
As you can see by the attached worksheet, we need to look at replacing three (3)
units in budget year 86/87, and four (4) units in budget year 87/88. This will
mean we will be getting upwards to 150,000 miles on the units, which at that time
one has to consider metal fatigue.
We have scheduled beginning April 12, 1985 the first retrofit of the three units
that need to be completed this fiscal year, and one unit per week thereafter until
completed. After July of 1985, we will then schedule the units for FY 85/86 for
retrofitting, which will allow us to work through budget year 86/87 without
purchasing any new patrol units.
-y
Chief of Police
+ I
(
1�
'R4-1
�
s4et ,I"A-
VOL
Fy
n
8/
b
,��� 187
y4v 'A
�s� 8y185
144$ b,--Cd R 4�r Pe4ao-
i uJt;r <i �► ; _ 8a, ash y -rA* :
J
I'
i
f M;r �S 8 3 �� r�,' = yl l9/ Av �„• : 1 8S1 g7 f8$
FY 85/8
62 ?A/ 87166
86187 Sino-e►e vise 2s V e A s-c-C .. R4 --P;r 8087
r h
t l�� r 7 11(o) �0 3 i4,
I
;! i4ot'T /s 81 ht 1= Sy, 3 a y� ,�I
rlvee A r 12e42o- tc,'7' /ala w
�
' n� �7 �� 30 1� `_ a I�G7 �i q•t� r,; /, boa
( Luyi T 02 3 / t,� y h•�i o��., O a�� p o Kill
i
1�
�
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD' OREGON
T0- BUDGET COMMIT-TEE APRIL 8' 1985
FROMJOY MARTIN, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
SUBJECT: FEES AND CHARGES SUMMARY
Po The issue is whether applicants for special services uhall pay
the full coot for the service as determined for a normal processing, or shall
the General Fund subsidize the special service. A secondary issue is whether
there are some services for which there should not be a charge.
Last year City Council net the policy for fees and charges
to be set at the rate of 80% of the average cost. Counoil is reluctant to
charge at the level of 100% of the average onot until all special services are
considered. The policy of charging the full, established fee and not reducing
charges in individual cases is being practiced following a recent Council
discussion. The main reason in because we do not charge more for individual
cases taking more time than the average.
The secondary issue refers to areas where we do not charge for special
services, the most obvious being for use of the library. Currently, we do riot
charge users residing within the County, or working in the City' for use of
the library. The reasoning is that these users are paying for library
services either through the City's taxes or through the W.C.C.L.S. levy.
These two policy areas need to be confirmed, refined, or changed within the
context of the City' s current fiscal situation.
Discussion Attached is a draft summary of the fees and charges showing
current rate' cost, 00% of cont' and proposed. The fees are taken from the
City' s Revenue Manual, resolutions passed since February 1, 1984, and
discussions by Council.. Coots are computed with the same methodology an
before (a sample worksheet with instructions is attached) . A few new fees are
listed at the end.
In reviewing the current charges in relation to costs you may notice that in
some omnea it appears we are overcharging. 'This is due to successfully
streamlining the administrative process.
'
Staff in encountering some problems with inconsistent percentages of ommta
being net for different feen. This is largely due to the timing of setting
rates — only new fees are set at 00% of cost with previously established fees
ranging above and below that point. In the past Council has considered the
�
applicant's general situation when setting rates. An alternative you may want
to consider for applicants requiring multiple applications is to have a base
fee with charges after the base being a percentage of the actual rate.
Fees & Charges Memo
April 3' 1986
Page 2
Recommended Action Discuss the policy issues and determine whether or not to
advise Council to
(a) continue setting rates at 00% of cost,
(b) continue exploring alternative charges and recommendations of
potential charges,
(o) explore and suggest creative solutions for certain applicants,
such as those requiring multiple permits, and
(d) exhaust all putentiml areas to charge for services, including the
library.
(07B6p)
"w�
' t
FEES AND CHARGES WORKSHEET (8/84a)
GOODS AND SERVICE FEE - REIMBURSEMENT
NAME: FEE TITLE:
DEPT HEAD OK: PROPOSED
DATE: EXISTING
SERVICE (What is the service, and Why do we do it?)
SERVICE COSTS:
DIRECT LABOR
Position Title Activity Description Avg.Hrs. Net Wage Cost
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS: a
DIRECT MATERIALS AND SERVICES:
' Flat Rate for basic supplies (20% of a)
Other M&S common to all such services
M & S Description Cost Total Cost
TOTAL M & S COST: b
SUBTOTAL (a & b) c
INDIRECT OVERHEAD COSTS
Departmental (10% x c)
City (20% x c)
TOTAL OVERHEAD COST: d
MINIMUM FEE (c + d)
SPECIAL COSTS NOT INCLUDED ABOVE:
Description Added Costs Added Fee
(0537F)
DIRECTIONS - FEES AND CHARGES WORKSHEET (8/84a)
GOODS AND SERVICE FEE - REIMBURSEMENT
DIRECT LABOR
Overtime
Net Net
Range Position Wage Rate
* Office Aide P/T, Helper P/T, Interns 8.89 13.07
1) OAI, Secretary/Clerk 1 $11.20 16.46
2) OAII, Maintenance Worker $12.05 17.71
3) OAIII, Engr. Aide, Dispatcher/Clerk III $12.94 19.02
4) OAIV, Utility Worker 1 $13.92 20.46
5) Utility Worker II, Executive Secretary $14.99 22.00
6) Utility Worker III, Insp. I, Engr. Tech I, Planner I $16.06 23.61
7) Police Officer, Associate Librarian $17.31 25.45
8) Inspector II, Engr. Tech II, Corporal, Ass't Librarian $18.56 27.28
9) Insp. III, Sgt, Planner II, EIT., Adm.Ass't, Crew Chief $19.99 29.38
10) Accounting Mgr. , Support Serv. Mgr. $21.51 31.61
11) Ass't. Fin. Dir., Lieutenant, Supt. , Bldg. Official $23.11 33.97
12) Captain, Librarian $24.85 36.53
13) Finance Director, Planning Director $26.33 38.69
14) Police Chief $27.93 41.05
15) Public Works Director $29.58 43.48
DIRECT MATERIALS AND SERVICES
HOURLY EQUIP. COST HOURLY DEPRECIATION + HOURLY MAINTENANCE
HOURLY DEPRECIATION Purchase Cost of Equipment
Years of Usable Life x Hours Used Per Year
Hours Maint. per year x wage
Annual cost for Parts +
Annual fuel & lubricant costs +
Total Maintenance Costs =
HOURLY MAINTENANCE _ Total Maintenance Costs
Hours Used Per Year
(0537F)
1. NAME: Person(s) preparing the worksheet. R
2. DEPT.HEAD OK: Sign—off by Dept. Head that costs are FEES AND CKARCES WORKSHEET (8ie4.)
reasonable estimates for reimbursing the City for the goods and GOODS AND SERVII FEE - REIMBURSEMENT
services. 1 ( + EE TITLE: --
L Dl
PT. OK: PROPOSED
DATE ERISTINC
3. DATE: When the worksheet is prepared. 3
SE RVI Wh.tt 1e the service, end �Y do ve do It?)
4. FEE TITLE: Goods and services should be divided into
purchaseable units that benefit individuals or establishments �� I
with little benefit to others. "
SERVICE COSTS:
6
5. SERVICE: Describe what the City does for the individual or DIRECT LABOR
group and why the city provides the service. Reasons may Position Title Activity Description A,I.Hrr. Net W.R. Co.t
include state b/or local regulations, (give ORS or TMC
reference), community or individual's safety, etc.
6. SERVICE COSTS: These are cost estimates based upon the
normal processing of an application or the provision of a
service or good.
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS: s
7. DIRECT LABOR: Costs are estimated using net wages for the
staff members who assist in providing the service. Net wages DIRECT MATERIALS AND SERVICES: O
P g g TLc Mete for basic supplies (202 0[ e) 8
are calculated using salaries at the top step of each range in other MCS coon to all such services—
the 1984-85 City pay plan plus benefits (30X). The total is N 4 S Description Coat Totel cost
divided by the net productive hours (1784). Net Wages by
position are given on page 2.
8. DIRECT MATERIALS AND SERVICES:
Flat Rate includes the basic office materials and supplies. TOTAL M c S COST: b
Other M&S may include special mailings, notices, contractural
services, etc. Calculate costs for the use of mayor equipment SUBTOTAL (• b) t
(including software packages) using the formula on page 2 of INDIRECT OVERHEAD COSTS
directions. Departsental (101 R c)
City (20E ■ c) 9
9. INDIRECT OVERHEAD COSTS: Costs are charged as a percentage TOTAL OVERHEAD COST: d
of direct costs. These cover supervision, payroll, personnel,
cashiering, and administrative costs which are realistically a MINIMUM FEE (c + d) _J
cost of doing business. SPECIAL COSTS NOT INCLUDED ABOVE: O
Description lU Added Cost. Added Fee
10. SPECIAL COSTS NOT INCLUDED ABOVE: Use this if the service
sometimes includes extra steps or activities not required for
the basic service. Coats are to be calculated using overtime
wage rates and are given on the following page. Examples of
special costs are transcripts, added appeals, etc.
(o577F)
I
PAGE RAI-E FEE AND CHARGE CURRENT' COST' 80% PROPOSED ADOPTED NOTES
SETTER
2 Voters x Base 84/85 $776'000
Prior_Years, Late or Delinquent varies
2 C.C. TAXES, Business Tax, by No. of employees
0-10 employees $40/yr.
11-50 employees $75/yr.
51 + employees $150/yr.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SHARED REVENUES (I.S.R. )
� WC/CC I.S.R. : Countv U.S.A.
4 WC/CC I.S.R. : County-Li rarv-WCCLS
4 Wa.Co. I.S.R. : Countv-Gas 'Tax
4 Wa.Co. I.S.R. : County--Hotel-Motel Tax
5 State I.S.R. :
5 State I.S.R. : Liguor Tax
5 State I.3.R. : State Revenue Lh��r
5 State I.S.R. : State B.O.R. Grants
S State I.S.R. : State Library Grant Aid
6 State I.S.R. : State Street Tax
7 Federal I.S.R. :
LICENSES AND PERMITS (L & P)
9 State L&P: Buildinq Permit, by total valuation
il.OU 1 Fo $5 6 0—.-6 $10
� $501.00 to $2000.00 $10+1
$2001 .00 to $25,000.00 $32.50+1
$25,001.00 to $50'800.80 $170.58+1
$50,801.00 to $100'000.80 $203 .00+1
$100,081.00 to $1'000'000.00 $483.00+1
$1,000'000.00 and up $2'683 .88+1
'
1 See Reuer. ) Manual for actual rates,
�
PAGE RATE FEE AND CHARGE CURRENT COST 80% PROPOSED ADOPTED NOTES
SETTER
10 State L&P: Buildinq Plan ' by% % of
Building Permit Fee 69%
11 TRFPQ/ L&P: , by % of 40%
DC Building Permit Fee (5% to City)
11 State L&P: State Surcharqe 4% to
State
12 State L&P: Other Buildinq In Fees
- Inspection outside normal working $40/hr.
�
�
hours min.$80
Reinspection fee $20
Other Inspections $40/hr.
Additional plan review required by $48/hr,
changes, additions, revisions to min.1/2 hr.
approved plans
12 L&P: Master Plan Review Fee $40/hr.
13 State L&P: Mechanical Permit Fee, rate per item $4.50-
$11 .00
13 State L&P: ^ by % of
Mechanical Permit Fee 25%
13 State L&P: State S by % of Mechanical 4% to
�
Permit Fee State
�
14 State L&P: Plumbinq Permit, rate per item $7.50 -
$30.00
14 State L&P: State Surcharge, by % of Plumbing 4% to
Permit Fee State
'
'
See Rever-lk Manual for actual. rates. �
~
PAGE RATE FEE AND CHARGE CURRENT COST 80% PROPOSED ADOPTED NOTES
SETTER
15 State LAP:
58 cubic yards or less $10.00
51-100 cubic yards $15.00
' 101-1,000 cubic yards $1VO0+
1'001-10'800 cubic yards $78.00+
$10'001-100,000 cubic yards $132.00+
$100'001 cubic yards or more $375.00+
16 State LAP: Fill (Gradingl Plan Check Fee
50 cubic yards or less -��-
51-100 cubic yards $10.00
�
^ 101-1,000 cubic yards $15.00
1,001-10^000 cubic yards $20.00
$10'001-100,000 cubic yards $20.00+
$100'001-200'000 cubic yards $110.08+
$200,000 cubic yards or more $170.00+
16 State LAP: $15/hr.
Ind Fees min. 1/2 hr.
17 Council LAP: aign Permit
0-26 sq. ft. $18
26-100 sq. ft. $25
over 100 aq. ft. $25+1
Maximum permit $100
Re-inspection $10
Temporary Sign $10
� Planning Commission Review Fee $25
=~
Council L&P: j�ion �200 ���� �2Q2 $250
1 �
�
See Ruve, JIManual for actual rates.
- ^�
PAGE RASE FEE AND CHARGE CURRENT COST 80% PROPOSED ADOPTED NOTES
SETTER
18 U.S.A. L&P: Sewer Permit
Connection Fee (Sewer S.D.C.)
Basic Residential $925
City Share (20%)
U.S.A. Share (80%)
Basic Non--Residential $.001
Inspection Fee
Residential. $35
City Share (601%)
U.S.A. Share (40%)
Commercial $45
City Share (60%)
U.S.A. Share (40%)
Industrial $75
City share (60%)
U.S.A. Share (40%)
19 Council L&P: Sewer in lieu of Assessment Fee
{Sewer Surcharge Connection Fee) $3000x-1
20 Council L&P: Street Openinq Permit
Limited Time, by % of construction 4%,
cost min. $100 $103
Annual Permit, for utilities $100
1 See Reuer- Manual for actual rates.
PAGE RATE FEE AND CHARGE CURRENT COST 80% PROPOSED ADOPTED NOTES
SETTER
20 Council, L&P: Subdiv tall tion Fees
Subdivision Permit, by % of est. 4% +z 4% Using 30 lot examp.
construction cost, less cost of
sewers
20 U.S.A. L&P Sewer Main Plan Check Fee $40/lot, $40/lot Using 30 lot exmmp.
min.$100
20 P.Q.E. L&P Subdivision Street Lightjng Fee $.001 Insp. nmwtw only
FRANCHISES (FR)
21 Council FR: Electricity (PGE)` by % of gross 3%
revenue collected within City limits
21 Council FR: (N.W. Natural Gas Co. ), 3%
by % of gross revenue collected
within City limits
21 Council FR: Tglephone (General Telephone), by 3%
% of gross revenue collected within
City limits
21 Council FR: Telyaphone (Pan. N.W. Bell)' by % 3%
of gross revenue collected within
City limits
�
� Council FR: Solid Waste Disposal (Frank's, 3%
Miller's' Sohmidt^a)' by % of
gross revenue collected within
City limits
21 Council FR: Cable TV (MACC/Stnrer Cable) by YC 3%
& MACC of gross revenue collected within
City limits
1 -
See Reve Manual for actual rates.
PAGE RATE FEE AND CHARGE CURRENT COST 80% PROPOSED ADOPTED NOTES
ETT R
BUSINESS LICENSES
23 Council B.L. : Liquor Licanves, per application $25
23 Council B.L. : fic cle License -�-
LICENSES & PERMITS
24 Council L&P: Park .Relervatianj (Cook Park)
Non-Refundable Park Reservation fee $10
Fee per day (weekly) for softball or $10 weekly?
soccer field
Additional Group Fee 1
jp
Group 1 -0-
Group 2 $.00,
Group 3 s.001
25 Council L&P: Alarm Pe:, its
Burglary or Robbery Alarm $15/yr. $20/yr $16/yr $20/yr
Combination Burglary/Robbery Alarm $25/yr.
First revoked user' s permit in $60 ea.
permit yr.
Second revoked user's permit in $120 ea.
permit yr.
Third and each additional revoked $188 ea.
user's permit in permit year
Failure to obtain or renew a permit $25
Special alarm user's permit $1001
Special alarm user' s fee $601
�
\ 1 See Revenue Manual for actual. ratea
\ '
. 6 �
�
PAGE RATE F'EE AND CHARGE CURRENT COST 80% P R 0 P 0 IS I"-"D ADOPTED NOI-ES
SETTER
CHARGES
27 Council CH: Comprehensive Plan Processing
Text Only W $450 $807 $646 $800
Map Only $650 $807 $646 $800
Both Text and Map $1.000 $807 $646 $800
27 Council CH: Zone Chanqe Processing
wo Acres or Less $350 $537 $430 $350+ Cost does not vary
Two to Ten Acres $750 $537+ $430 $50/acre, this much by size.
Ten or More Acres $1.250+1 $537+ $430 up to
$2000
add: Council CH: Zone Change Annexations $675 $847 $678 $850
add: Council CH: Zone Ordinance Amendment $320 $397 $31.8 $397
27 Council CH: Planned Develo-Pment Processin2
Conceptual.� ITI.an Review $600 $694 $555 $700
Detailed Plan Review $400 $240 $192 $240
27 Council CH: Conditional Use Processing
Conditional Use Review $300 $571 $457 $570
Home Occupancy $75 $171 $137 $170
added Home Occupancy Renewal. $20 $ 20 $ 16 $ 20
28 Council CH: Temporary Use Processing
One to Three months by Planning Dir, $75/mo. $161 $129 $ 75/mo
Three months to 6 months by $150
Planning Comm.
Special Exemption for Non--Profits
add: 6 months to one year — City Council, $150 $196 $1.57 $196
add: Council CH: Accessory Uses/Accessory Structures $1.12 $1,22 $ 98 $1,20
29 Council. CH: Variance (Zoning) Processing
Approval by Hearings Officer
Subdivision Variance/PC $300 $401 $321 $400
Administrative Variance $200 $341 $273 $340
See Revenue Manual for actual. rates.
PAGE RATE FEE AND CHARGE CURRENT COST 80% PROPOSED ADOPTED NOTES
- - - - — -
SETT R
CHARGES
28 Council CH: Sensitive Lands_ P!�,ocessina
Sensitive Lands Review $500 $614 $491 $615
Administrative Lands Review �- $471 $377 $470
28 Council CH: Site Development Review Proc $466 $373
Under $10,000 $75
$10'000-$09'909 $150
$100'000-$499'900 $300
$500,000-$999,999 $400
$1,000,000 or more $508+1
�
�
29 Council. CH: Land Division Processing
Minor Land Partitions
Residential $150 $341 $273 $340
Mon-Residential $300 $341 $273 $340
Subdivisions & Major Land Partitions $341 $273 $340
Preliminary Plat $268+1 $557 $446 $650+
Final Plat $100+1 $147 $118 $140+
30 Council CH: Other Processing
Street/Land Dedication (Delete) $100 -0- Should we charge?
Street/Land Vacation $260
Review by Planning Commission $.001 $226 $181 $225
Review by City Council $300 1
add: Appeal of Director's Deciuiqn $240 $180 $144 $180
�
Interpretation of CDC by Plan. Dept $ 50 $ 66 $ 53 $ 66
�
1
See Revenue Manual for actual rates.
�
� ��
PAGE RATE FEE AND CHARGE CURRENT COST A(% PROPOSED ADOPTED NOTES
SETTER
add: Council CH: $200 $121 $ 97 $120
add: Council. CH: Zero Lot Line Setback Standards $220 $276 $221 $275
add: Council CH- Lot Line Adiustment $228 Part of other review
add: Council CH: Historic Overlav District $400 $519 $415 $920
add: Council CH: Tree .Removal Permit $ 44 $ 25 $ 20 $ 25
add: Council CH: Blastinq Permit Fee $120 $146 $117 $146
Council CH: $250+
30 Council CH: $100
CHARGES - SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES (SDC)
31 Council SDC: Streets
Single Family Residence $400
Multi-Family Residence,
charge per unit $240
Mobile Home Ct. ' charge per space $150
Commercial, Industrial, Inotitutional
charge per required parking space $ SO
31 Council SDC: Parks
Single Family Residence $100 .
Multi-Family Residences,
�
charge per unit $ 60
�
Mobile Home Ct. , charge per space $ 50
1 See Revenue Manual for actual rates.
' 9
�
PAGE RATE FEE AND CHARGE CURRENT COST 80% PROPOSED ADOPTED NOTES
SETTER
31 Council SDC: Storm Drainaqe
Single FamiIy Reuidential, charge
per ERU $250
Multi-Family Residential, charge
per ERU $250
Non-Residential, charge per ERU $258
CHARGES-USER FEES (CH)
32 USA/CC CH: Sewer User Service Charge
Residential, charge per quarter $28.50
-
Non-Residential, charge per number
.�
^�
of plumbing unit fixtures $ .001
32 Council CH: Storm Drainaqe User Fee (Impervious
Services)
Single Family Residential, charge
per ESU per month $ .75
Multi-Family Residential, charge
per ESU per month $ .75
Non-Residential, charge per ESU
per month $ . 75
FINES AND FORFEITURES (F&F)
34 Council F&F: Overdue Fines-Library
Charge per item per day, not to $50 to $1.00 to
exceed charge per notice $6.00 $8 .93 $7.14 $10.00
�
o4- Council. F&F: $.08 $14.29 $K11.48 $14.00
Charge for staff time only
34 Council F&F: Lost/Mutilated Library Card
Charge per card $50
'1 See Revenue Manual for actual rates.
�
�� �
PAGE RATE 17EE AND CHARGE CURRENT COST 80% PROPOSED ADOPTED NOTES
34 Council p&F: Out—of—Countv User Card
Char8e per �ard per year (Cost is $10 $6.02 $4.81+
for patron registration ONLY) $63 .66)
84 Council F&F:
Library
Charge per card $.50
add: Council F&F:
Photocopier, charge per copy $. 10 $.963 $. 77
Microfiche, charge per copy $.15 $1.948 $1.55
-
Council F&F: Municipal Court $.001
MISCELLANEOUS (MISC)
37 Cmunoil MISC: Sale of Comprehensive Plan Docs .
Comprehensive Plan $10.00 $10.
Findings, Policies, Imple. ,Strateg. $3.00 $3.
Community Development Code $19.00 $19.
Complete Set $25.00 $32.
37 Council MISC: Police Copies Charge
Police Report Copies, charge
per report $5.+' $7.63+ $6. 10 $7.50
Police Photographs Copies, charge
per print $2. $2. 16 $1.73 $2.10
Fingerprints, charge per net $5. $8.18 $6.48 $8.80
-
Council MISC: Plan Deposit,-Community Dmxel.
�
QW.
Replacement onut if plan not
'
returned $100.
' 2 Cost for average service and use of library per year
3 Cost per request
~
.
See Revenue Manual for actual rates.
' 11
`
`
PAGE RATE FEE AND CHARGE CURRENT COST 80% PROPOSED ADOPTED NOTES
SETTER
38 Council MI8C: Sale of Maps
1680 Series, charge per copy after first $ .50
1200 Series, charge per copy $ 1 .00
300 Series, charge per sheet $ 1.00
400 Series, charge per sheet $ 2.00
200 Series, charge per sheet $ 2.00
008 Series, lots only, charge per sheet $ 2.80
NOU Series, roads only, charge per sheet $ 1.00
Plwoimetrio, blueline print, charge
per quarter section $25.00
add� Photocopy a portion of a quarter section,
charge per copy $ .25
~�
38 Council MISC: Sale of Photocopi d Documents
Charge per copy $ .25
38 Council MISC: Sale of Tiqard Municipal Code
Charge per TMC $75.00
38 Council MISC: Sale—of Street Name and Traffic
Signs
Charge cost of materials $ .004
39 Council MISC: Restitution Funds
Insufficient Funds Check Fee $10.00 $27. $22 $25
39 Council MISC: Recovered Expenditures
L.I.D. Administrative owotu' % of
�
project omot recovered for
^�
assessments. 2%
4
Current rate schedule low. Being reviewed.
^
� See Revenue Manual for actual rates.
'
12
PA( E RATE FEE AND CHARGE CURRENT COST 80% PROPOSED ADOPTED N0TES
SETTER
39 Council MI8C: Recovered Expenditures
L.I.D. Engineering costs, charge to
project on actual per hour costa $ .001
new Council MISC: Recordinq of Document
Costs not including County' s fee $55. $44 $55
new Council MISC: Construction Plan Review &
Costs for initial plan review
not recovered if application not
'
completed
�
�
(0771p)
^
,
�
See Revenue Manual for actual rates.
13
| �
� �