11/18/1987 - Packet CITY OF TTCARD
UTILITIES AND FRANCHISE C0MMITT[E
MEETING AGENDA
Wednesday, November 18, 1987 — 7:00 P.M.
Tigard City Hall — Town Hall Conference Room
Members : BHRRETT w^' JHC08S MoREYNOLDS '~~~
MISOVETZ W0�EN IRWIN
----'
l . Call to Order and Roll Call.
2. Minutes of October 14. 1087 meeting.
/ .
/ cp
3 Franchise Agreemento
\ � .
� 4. Tualatin River.
5. Solid Waste — Lions Club Recycling.
o
0. Other Business .
7. Adjournment.
br/1852D
ONVI
NOV G 1987
P *R *I *D* E "Ilk CITY OF TIGARD
DISPOSAL COMPANY PLANNING DEPT.
10 684-7849
1JAPC-,
November 4, 19
L�
City of Tigard v
PO Box 23397 O b1GU� .•�
Tigard, OR. 97223 rev
Atten: Keith Lidner ' aF T1GP D
RE: Balzer Paints
ptwvA `tjc, aE 1987
Mr. Lidner,
This is to notify you that we have sent notice to
Balzer Paints, regarding disposal of their paints.
The first notice went out October 14, 1987.
Driver reports that today they still are putting
paint in the container, and then covering the paint
cans with refuse.
Please find a copy of both notices that were sent. ! your company that we cannot
lint cans into the container
Thank You, )se of them sooner we sugest
Pride Disposal Co. 1 not service your container.
-acts the trash in his truck,
kg the roads.
P.O.Box 839
Sherwood OR 97140
(503)684-7849
ice.
Pride Disposal Co .
(;I ; y o1
"Serving Your Community's Entire Needs"
NOV G 1987
CITY OF TIGARD
PLANNING DEPT.
DISPOSAL COMPANY
P. O. Box 839 Sherwood, OR 97140 684-7849
November 4, 1987
Balzer Paints
12155 SW Grant St.
Tigard, Or. 97223
RE: Disposal of Paint
Sirs,
Per our notice dated October 14, 1987, we notified your company that we cannot
haul house paints. If you are going to put the paint cans into the container
they must be completely dry. If you need to dispose of them sooner we sugest
you call DEQ for proper disposal.
If there is paint in the container the driver will not service your container.
When there is paint in the container, and he compacts the trash in his truck,
the paint leaks all over our equipment and on to the roads.
If there is problem with this please call our office.
Pride Disposal Co.
cc : City of Tigard
k!
"Serving Your Community's Entire Needs"
T
DISPOSAL COMPANY
P. O. Box 820 • Sherwood, OR 97140 • 625-6177 IU '
DEAR CUSTOMER:
We need your HELP. The Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act makes employers
responsible for the Safety of his employees. Frequent serious injuries are sustained
by Sanitary Service Employees while lifting, carrying and handling loads which are too
peavey, bulky or located in a manner that makes them difficult to handle. Medical costs
can range into the thousands of dollars and in some cases, the worker is permanently
disabled and no longer able to support tits family. Our insurance carrier tells us that
we must now limit service In the following manner:
(1) Cans must he limited to 32 gal. In size and 60 lbs in weight. Please do not
stuff or overload cans. Containers must be rigid, rodent proof and have
adequate hand holds on the side. Metal. or sturdy plastic cans are recommended.
(2) Any item placed next to, or on top of, the can (recycables excluded) are
subject to extra charges.
(3) Recycling is available to our customers at no extra cost.
(4) , lie cannot haul any type of hazardous wastes: chemical sprays, house and
car paints, or any chemical solutions. " Please call DEQ for proper disposal .
(5) Underground (sunken) cans cannot be removed safely and cannot be serviced.
(6) Please locate cans where we can get to them easily and where our driver can
see them by 6:00 AM in the morning.
(7) All extra trash to be hauled requires a note, with your name and address,
telling what you want hauled away. Please call our office to make arrangements
for hauling of .large bulky items.
(8) Payment of bills is expected by the loth of the month.
(9) If can is not out and service 1s required hefore your next pickup day, it
service charge will be added to your next statement .
( 10) HOLIDAYS: Drivers will work all holidays except, THANKSGIVING, CHRISTMAS ,
AND NEW YEARS DAY. On these 3 days please he prepared for service elthri
earlier or later than usual .
You are our customer ,and we wlII work with you anyway we call to make the trensitf, ;
as easy as possible . (I��t.���ver , ! f these iaea�,ure�. are not adapted , insurance cost,
will increase and viii have to he passed along to you. Therefore , it is In our unitu:ii
Interest that these t"safety Rules he observed . Your cooperation will be deeply
appreciated.
"Serving Your Community's Entire Needs"
Mem,, randum
2000 S.W.First Avenue
Portland,OR 97201-5398
503/221-1646
TO Local jurisdictions
FROM Vickie Rocker,Public Affairs Director
DATE October 27, 1987
RE: INTEREST GROUP INVENTORY FOR SOLID WASTE PLAN
As you know,the region's jurisdictions are now working in partnership to build a new
solid waste management plan. The goal is to reach consensus on-a regionwide system of
waste reduction and disposal by mid-1989. Committees are working its formulate draft
"policy element"white papers for public review and comment.
In order to inform the public about this project,we would like to work together with you to
target interested groups in your area,profile each group and learn the best approach to
reach each group. These groups may include the following:
Neighborhood associations/CPOs
Business and industry(trade associations,toxic waste committees,refuse/recycling
managers)
Economic development groups,chambers of commerce
Haulers,recyclers and their associations
Interested elected officials and government staff
Environmental groups (Sierra Club, Audubon,Greenpeace,etc.)
Issue-oriented groups (City Club,League of Women Voters)
Special interest and ad hoc groups
Professional associations (educators,engineers,etc.)
Social/service groups (Kiwanis, Rotary,Lions, etc.)
We need to contact all of the most active and influential groups in your area. Indicate on
the enclosed form the name of the group,the contact person and the availability of the
mailing list,if known. If you have a general public mailing list for your community,this
may also be useful in disseminating information. Please indicate your willingness to share
this general list.
It would help to know the person to contact for more information about the leadership,
purpose and membership of the group,and the best way to reach them with information
about the solid waste planning process.
Please complete the form by Friday,November 6 and return to Marilyn Matteson,public
involvement specialist, at Metro.
Thank you for your help. If you have any questions,please contact me or Marilyn at 221-
1646.
SOLID WASTE PLANNING INTEREST GROUP INVENTORY FORM
10/87
Person to contact for background information about groups:
Name Phone
List of active, influential groups in community:
Name of group
Purpose # of members
Group leader Phone
Address
City/State/Zip
Mailing list available?
Newsletter name and frequency
Name of group
Purpose #of members
Group leader Phone
Address
City/State/Zip
Mailing list available?
Newsletter name and frequency
Name of group
Purpose # of members
<K Group leader Phone
Address
City/State/Zip
Mailing list available?
Newsletter name and frequency
Name of group
Purpose # of members
Group leader Phone
Address
City/State/Zip
Mailing list available?
Newsletter name and frequency
Name of group
Purpose # of members
Group leader Phone
Address
City/State/Zip
Mailing list available?
Newsletter name and frequency
Name of group
Purpose # of members
Group leader Phone
Address
City/State/Zip-
-Mailing list available?
Newsletter name and frequency
Name of group
Purpose # of members
Group leader Phone
Address
City/State/Zip
Mailing list available?
Newsletter name and frequency
Name of group
Purpose # of members
Group leader Phone
Address
City/State/Zip
Mailing list available?
Newsletter name and frequency
Name of group
Purpose #of members
Group leader Phone
Address
City/State/Zip
Mailing list available?
Newsletter name and frequency
RN
ICoatinaed from page 21 0'
Company Essential for Economy • Repackaging,labeling,preparation of
.7 manifests.
By David D.Emery After on-site confirmation of wastes, -...\4PLIANCE
Wescomp President Wescomp crews repackage materials as
Astateof-the-art facility now exists "The future economic necessary to ensure safe transport. BCttC1- SO)IUCIOIIS for IndLIStlAaI %stC ��Illna—cmcnt
in the Pacific Northwest to offer a better f opportunities O the Labels and manifests are prepared in Vol. 1, No. 1 October/November 1987
solution to industry's waste managementcompliance with EPA and Department
needs_This fully permitted,fully insured Northwest will of Transportation regulations and
facility represents a$1.5-million procedures.
development effort over the past two depend on the • Collection of wastes. You're Invited
years_
p J resence of well– All wastes are transported to
We now have a fully trained staff Wescomp's transfer station on company to WescOm /5
with excellent experience in the managed hazardous vehicles equipped with secondary Wescomp
's
waste management business. containment safeguards to minimize the
This facility is a show piece for our waste management Open House
industry and is something the State of potential of spills on public streets and
Oregon can be proud of. companies. highways. Come take a look at our new facilities.
• t
Wescomp is holding an Open House
On March 17, 1987, "Fortune"maga- Receipt of wastes. of its new building on Thursday,
zine estimated that$3-to-$6 billion will Paperwork is double-checked upon October 29, opening its doors to the
be spent for at least the next 50 years to is experiencing tremendous growth in arrival of waste materials at Wescomp. general public and business operators in
control and manage hazardous waste the electronics industry.One company, Ten-day in-transit materials are segregated
r,
need of solutions to their industrial
and hazardous materials in the environ- is planning expansions that will involve for shipment to ultimate disposal site. g
ment.Northwest industries desperately approximately 500 employees at an Solvent materials are prepared separately
waste handling responsibilities. a .
need to find cost-effective solutions to investment of$137 million. for disposal. When r' ,
Thursday, October29.
waste management that meets or exceeds Have we truly prepared ourselves for • Recap.
standards set b the EPA and DE these growth o ortunities? Where: Modern Facility.Hugged b tall timber on the outskirts o Portland, Wescom 's new
Y Q• g PP After each project, the entire process Y � y f p
A better solution is now being Have the institutional framework is reviewed.Any problems encountered Holiday Inn at North Wilsonville Exit $1.5-million facility is Oregon's only fully permitted company devoted exclusively to the
offered to industries in Oregon, and treatment capacities been put in are assessed for avoidance in future (1-5)Dogwood Room transfer of hazardous waste.
Washington,Alaska and Idaho through place to handle the waste needs from ro ects. What:
the use of Mkscomp's facilities in Nampa, these new facilities? p Beverages,snacks and a brief A Better Solution for the Northwest
Idaho and Sherwood,Oregon.Small- Are the existing facilities adequate? • Transportation and disposal. presentation,followed by a short
quantity generators,as well as regulated Will we lose the opportunity to have When materials are ready for final shuttle bus ride and tour of Wescomp's A crucial alternative. tanks is reserved for polychlorinated
large-quantity generators of hazardous the Semiconductor Research Institute off-site disposal,all packaging,labels new building. That's what Western Compliance biphenyls(PCBs),while the other three
waste now have an option they can feel located in this state because we haven t and manifests are rechecked before Times: Services,Inc (Wescomp)offers North- tanks are designated for spent solvents.
comfortable with.We want industryaddressed an overwhelming basic need? transport of wastes to appropriate EPA- west companies—large and small— Double containment of all incoming
g approved disposal facilities. Presentation-Tours begin at which generate hazardous wastes that waste materials is provided throughout
leaders,environmental managers and These are thought-provoking ques- pp p 3:00 p.m.
agency regulators to visit our facilityto tions that are commonly overlooked must be safely and effectively managed the facility.Each bay is bermed to
Y • Record keeping. Free shuttle bus.No private vehicles under state and federal law. contain any spills that might occur.In
make their own assessments. when we dont work closely with others From start to final disposal,detailed will be allowed in this facility. 'Were a better solution—arriving in addition,each group of tanks in each
The future economic opportunities who are charged with the development records are kept on each project. Reservations are required.Please call the nick of time;'is how president bay also provides double containment,
of the Northwest will depend on the of our economic base.And they are Documentation is kept for three years Northwest Strategies,Inc at(503) David Emery puts it. acting as an extra precautionary
presence of well-managed hazardous questions that must be asked—and to ensure proper"cradle to grave"track- 241-8383 to confirm your attendance On November 2,Oregons only fully safeguard.To ensure complete safety,
waste management companies.Oregon answered. ing of wastes. and schedule. permitted company devoted exclusively no wastes are unloaded outside the new
to the storage and transfer of hazardous facility,points out facility manager Roy
waste, opens the doors to its newly Druby.
(WESTERN LI
COMPANCE OPX .0 X completed,$1.5-million transfer-storage Must Comply Under Law
�( ;( )\l l'I;I.\\( a', is a �—►SERVICES, INC. station tucked into 21/2 wooded acres Mandated by the 1984 Hazardous
community newsletter published by Mailing address, West6 on the outskirts of Portland. and Solid Waste Amendments to the
Western Compliance Services, Inc, e0.Box 338 r- Comp The Best in the West Resource Conservation and Recovery
P.O. Box 338,Tualatin,OR 97062. Tualatin,OR 97062 tom' r�%ik.,F Act(RCRA)passed b Congress in
This issue was produced by (503)682-2341 "This state-of-the-art operation is the p Y g
Northwest Strategies Inc Delivery address: Ri.1.1 Monahan — best we know how to build;'says 1976,more than 1,000 small businesses
11330 SW Clay Street Community Deve1opment n i r.. . - Emery. "It actually exceeds government in Oregon have been ordered to comply
VOL. 1,NO.1 Sherwood,OR 97140 g with federal and state hazardous waste
FAX(503)682-5853 Cit o f T i.o a r.d standards for hazardous waste storage
OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 1987 Y x facilities:' regulations, notes Gene Tienken,
P. o. Bo. 23397 • Wescom s vice resident of marketing.
Resembling a warehouse girdled by a p P g•
Tigard , OR 9 7 2 2 3 security fence, Wescomp's brand new "The governing regulations are
Experienced Managers. Wescomp president 10,000-square-foot building on Clay stringent and complex;'remarks
David Emery(left)confers with senior vice
president Dr. Charles Scott alongside one Street in Sherwood contains five bulk Timken, "making it extremely frustrat-
of the contpanys fleet of specially designed storage tanks grouped on opposite ends ing and almost economically impossible
trucks. of the building. One group of two IContmucd ou hags•21
I
W(;I�S'I'ERN 1�STERN
STERN
W( ()MPLIANCF,
"Oregon didn't have hk Management Commands Array of Industry Expertise
a single collection, Vital to the safe,effective operation More than 20 years of hands-on As regional sales manager for
of any licensed hazardous waste facility experience in environmental manage- Denver-based Envirosafe Services,Inc,
transfer and storage '
r"�` � are its thoroughly experienced manage- ment earned working for the EPA and then assistant sales manager and finally
facility to provide the *. ment and staff.Wescomp is fortunate private industry,eminently qualifies western sales manager at the company's
-- to have some of the most qualified and Dr.Scott as Wescomp's regulatory Boise,Idaho facility,Duane Church-
critically-needed, y knowledgeable professionals in this compliance officer. well compiled more than six years of
." highly demanding business. Formerly an EPA federal enforce- field experience in the hazardous waste
legally required waste - ment officer working with the State of management business.A graduate of
management services. *= x David D.Emery Idands hazardous waste program,then the University of Northern Colorado
President
as an environmental safety officer over with a degree in chemistry and
—Dr.Charles Scott �' °,;- seeing the disposal of Owyhee County's mathematics,he helped redesign
i Class I hazardous waste,he also has Envirosafes Boise Operations.
f,v. provided technical and regulatory train-
(Continued from page 1) ing to state and local personnel in the _ Roy A.Druby
control,storage, treatment, transport- Facility Manager
for small companies to comply without ing and disposal of hazardous materials.
a proper waste management facility to
advise them or to safely collect,pack- � :. Gene E Tienken
age and transport their designated
g Po Vice President of Marketing
waste materials to approved hazardous
waste management facilities" David Emery brings a wide range
AT` of qualifications garnere
All Necessary Approvals d from both
Temporary Ston Two Wescomp technicians transfer liquid waste from an incoming drum public pndhead
private sectors to his perposmitted Western Compliance Services P Y 8'e• P � 9 fr g tion as head of Oregons only permitted `�►�
launched operations as a waste storage to a bulk storage tank at the Sherwood facility.
storage facility devoted exclusively to AL
facility on January 16,1987 after
submitting its RCRA Part A applica- Safety Comes First With Full Range the transfer a hazardous waste. Coming off three decades st y,Roy i-
tion to the federal Environmental Serving the Environmental Protec- sory positions in the oil industry,-Roy
Protection Agency(EPA)and the State Of Waste Services tion Agency at its Washington,D.C. Druby switched to hazardous waste
Department of Environmental Quality headquarters,he worked to establish management in 1980 when he took
Wescomp's 10-step operating proce- water quality standards before transfer- Active since 1977 in the transporta- charge of Chemical Waste Manage- .
(DEQ)a year earlier.The operation Po
dure—systematically set in motion � ring to the regulatory agency's Regional tion and storage of hazardous wastes, ment's deep well disposal program.
received approval from the Washington V Ve try to eliminate Offices in Denver to administer manage- g
with each incoming project—demon- y g Gene Tienken brings more than 20 Joining Wescomp last year as opera-
County Land Development Manager ngs
strates the company's meticulous ment responsibilities and EPA grants tions manager,Druby was given
on January 7,1986. a azar y years of experience in the chemical and
attention to preparation and detail. for clean air and water within the waste management industries. responsibility for the construction of
DEQ approved Wescomp's storage of g
hazardous waste materials including "'Because the hazardous waste protecting both human Rocky Mountain region. the company's Sherwood facility.
p g Associated from 1966 through 1977
pe ng management business carries necessary health and the Active in hazardous waste Sentry
spent cleaning solvents from the ag Y with Shell Chemical and Great Western
risks;'notes acting operations manager ment as a vice president with Sentry Geo R.Vernon
automotive,aircraft,electronic and ng Pe g Chemical,he helped develop both com-
Duane Churchwell,"we try to eliminate environment through Corporation,Emery was instrumental Vice Pmsident of Finance
wood products industries,among Y g panies chemical programs.Tienken
in securing the first Part B-RCRA permit
others,along with contaminated paint all hazards by protecting both human founded Western Compliance Services,
and paint thinners from other businesses health and the environment through a , a carefully rehearsed ever issued for mobile treatment opera- Inc in 1982.
such as metal fabricators,refineries and carefully rehearsed and orchestrated chain o f events." tions in California,as well as a Part B
automobile dealers. chain of events.Each step is executed permit for a fixed treatment facility in Duane R. Churchwell
Aside from being an approved short- deliberately and in proper sequence" Denver. Vice President of Sales
term storage facility,Wescomp is also a • Customer contact/project assessment. . Interpretation and paperwork. (Acting Operations Manager)
Dr.Charles D.Scott
w
permitted transporter of hazardous Initial client contact consists of a set Analysis results are compared with
pe po Y P Senior Vi«President– Corporate -
waste.�Regulatory Provisions specify of questions to determine specific types information gathered by preparer. Environmental Safety&Regulatory Officer
.}
that the company cannot retain any of of waste involved. After detailed interpretation of all data, .
the waste materials in transporter status • Sample and analysis. necessary permit applications are pre-
at its facility longer than 10 days.This Waste samples are drawn to further pared for client's review and signature. An accountant for more than 30
aspect of the operation is tightly assess the project while Material Safety years in the trucking industry and with
governed by Oregond
In ads Public Utility Data Sheets(MSDS)are compiled along • Safety aand training.
to Wescomp's intensive = his own business,George Vernon joined
��_' � -
Commission and the DEQ. with the customer's knowledge of the - Wescomp in 1986, immediately adding
"Hazardous waste is everyones situation and materials.Analyses are on-going safety program,each project -- 4 the transportation aspects of hazardous
is reviewed and discussed with waste management to his comptroller
problem;"sums up Wescomp president performed by an outside agency under
employees to
Emery."And it wont go away by itself. Wescomp' proper safety procedures.s direction. assure strict adherence to duties.
,'
(Continued on page 4)
2 3
Oct . 30, 1987
Robert W. Jean
City Administrator
Tigard, Ore .
Dear Mr. Jean:
The King City Lions Club is unable to comply with the request
in your letter of Oct . 14th for the foll.owing reasons .
1. The club does not have any means to weigh the paper.
2. In our original meeting no mention was made regarding
this problem.
3 . The King City Lions Club is not a franchised garbage
hauler. Other clubs throughout the state have in-
formed me that they have not been required to make
such a report .
I have requested our local state representatives to furnish me
with a copy of the recycling law but have not received any reply.
Sincerely,
�
10V
James V. Blake
President of K.C. Lions Club
PM �,, ...�- .
/981
1�
i 1 i_L t',
Y
O
CITYOFTIVARD
October 14, 1987 OREGON
Mr. James Blake, President
KING CITY LIONS CLUB
12750 S.W. Prince Albert
King City, OR 97224
Dear Mr. Blake:
All franchised garbage haulers are required by State law to offer
curbside recycling. As a part of this, they are also required to
report to the State on how much material is collected.
Your Club has been allowed by Schmidt's Sanitary Service and a
letter of agreement from the City to collect newspapers in areas
of Summerfield. As a part of our agreement, you must provide to
Schmidt's a customer list and total number of pounds collected.
This is so they can comply with the State's reporting
requirements.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Yours truly,,
Rober Jean
st
City i ministrator
Attachment: 9/29/87 Schmidt letter
cc: Utilities and Franchise Committee
Keith Liden
Wayne Lowry
Cliff Scott
13125SWHall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-417l
29, JOP7
- .r . 75ob J( an
Citv of Tif-arrl
0. '30X 21,197
Or. 97?2h
)ear lob,
In rerards to our conversation of 9/28/87 involving the Kinrr
City Lions Club.
Under our a.,-reement with Kin.- City Lions Club T)erta.ininp to
picking ur, newspaper in the Summerfield area. The Lions Club
agreed to send us a customer list and total number of pounds
of newsprint recovered. Since this agreement took effect on
July 1 , 1987, we have not yet received any information required
by the afreement with Kin.7 City Lions Club.
Tle are notifying you that Kint, City Lions Club is not abidine, to
the agreement on suT)-olvinr the reports. ':Je are asking that
you contact them as to why t!i- rp-norts have not been provided
and to please furnish them as soon as T)ossible.
Your attention in this _matterwill be -reativ an-)reciate(I .
Sincerely,
Larry f3chmillt
-Schmitlt ')anitq-r-,r Service
P-32"', S.'!. Ross
PACIFIC TAX SERVICE
November 9, 1987
TO: Utilities & Franchise Committee, City of Tigard
FROM: Gerry McReynolds, Chairman
Subj : Unlicensed Collection of Recyclable Materials.
PROBLEM
Unlicensed (Franchised) individuals or firms are collecting the
valuable recyclable materials and selling them for personal gain or
charitable purposes.
The City of Tigard consented to allow the King City Lions Club to
pick up newspapers placed for recyclable collection in the
Summerfield area. This consent was agreed to by the responsible
solid waste hauler. However, this consent has an estimated value to
the rate payers of approximately $80. 00 per month. The Lions Club
agreed to submit volume information for reporting purposes to the
solid waste hauler which has not been done.
Unlicensed individuals are constantly picking up cardboard, etc.
which has a high value, from commercial shopping centers, apartment
houses, etc. The value is estimated to be more than $1, 000 per
month in lost revenues to the rate payers.
EFFECT ON RATE PAYERS
The King City Lions Club makes approximately $960. 00 ($80 X 12)
per year which represents 6.2% of the solid waste haulers net
operating income (used to set rates) . This would cost the rate
payers nearly $. 05 per can, if the rate was set on his business
alone.
The unlicensed individuals collecting cardboard is taking more than
$12 , 000 per year ($1, 000 X 12) which represents approximately 5% of
the solid waste haulers overall net operating income or
approximately $. 05 per can.
The collection of other recyclable materials could amount to several
dollars more and the effect could be $.50 to $1. 00 per can.
Tigard will loose $388. 80 in franchise fees from the King City
Lions Club and the unlicensed individual.
DISCUSSION
Traditionaly, recycling has been on a hit or miss basis depending on
the value of the recyclable materials. This was done mostly by
chartitable organizations, Boy Scouts, School Fund Raisers and some
private individuals entering or leaving the field depending on the
profits.
PACIFIC TAX SERVICE
Unlicensed Collection of Recyclable Materials
Page 2
In 1983 , the Oregon State Legislature, in order to combat the solid
waste disposal problems, passed Senate Bill 405, which the
"Opportunity to Recycle" is mandated (now ORS 459. 188) requiring
solid waste haulers provide this service through the City Franchise.
The cost of recycling is to be included (ORS 459 . 200) in the
authorized fee charged to the customers and to be offset by
recycling revenues.
The Legislature prohibited (ORS 459. 195) other persons or
organizations from interfering in the solid waste haulers collection
of recyclable materials. Although, the responisbility lies with the
City to provide and control such activities, the legislature
designated the solid waste hauler as the primary agent or vehicle to
provide this service.
The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) thru Washington County
requires the solid waste haulers to submit quarterly a report
stating the volume and household participation in recycling.
A laymen's interpretation of the Statutes (ORS 459) , indicates all
recycling must be handled by the solid waste haulers. This would
prohibit shopping center drop boxes, fund raisers, and private
individuals. These activities could be allowed by special permit
issued by the city and with the consent of the solid waste haulers
and any revenues generated must be added to the total revenues used
as a base for rate setting. If these activities were allowed, it
would be the same as the solid waste haulers giving a donation. It
isn't fair to the waste haulers. It isn't fair to the charitable
organizations. Most of all, it isn't fair to the rate payers, the
ones we are charged to protect.
SOLUTIONS
1. Tigard City Council needs an Ordinance that prohibits recycling
by others than solid waste haulers according to ORS 459.
2 . Resend the agreement with King City Lions Club.
3 . Enforce the ordinance and ORS 459 .
COMMITTEE ACTION
The committee, at its next meeting should discuss this problem and
decide what action or recommendation should be taken.
J CITY OF TUALATIN SEP 1s�
18880 SW MARTINAZZI AVE. PO BOX 369
TUALATIN, OREGON 97062-0369
(503) 692-2000
September 17 , 1987
Tim Ramis
City Attorney
City of Tigard
1727 NW Hoyt Street
Portland , OR 97209
Reference: Utility Franchise Rate Survey
Dear Tim:
Thank you for responding to the recent utility franchise
rate survey. As promised , I have enclosed a tabulation of
results. These figures are based on information provided by
the cities mentioned on the list, some of which may have
been prepared by in-house staff . No warranties are given as
to the accuracy of any information, other than Tualatin 's
rates. If you wish to verify any of the listed information,
I suggest you contact the particular city directly.
Thank you for your cooperation. I hope this information
will be of some use to you.
Sincerely,
1)
—74 4 A, /
Mark Pilliod
City Attorney
MP/se
Enclosure
f# UTIL0917 .LSL
UTILITY FRANCHISES RATES AND FEES
(as of September, 1987)
Solid Natural
Electricity waste Telephone CableGas then
Beaverton 3.5$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ water 8 sewer
fund payment in
lieu of taxes
Forest Grove n/a 3$ + 3$ 5$ of which 3$ n/a
3$ - City
2$ - Mall
Gresham 3.5$ 4$ 3$ 5$ 3$ n/a
Hillsboro 3.5$ 3$ 3$ 3% 3$ sewer d water - 3$
Lake Oswego 4$ $650/month 3$ MACC 3$ ambulance - 1$
Milwaukie 3.5$ $3,000 annual 3$ 5$ 3$ Union Pacific RR
$100 annual
Newberg 3.5$ 3$* 3$ 3$ n/a n/a
Oregon City 3$ $750 annual 3$ 6$ + 3$ Marina $2000/yr
free City line Pk.vendor $1800/yr
Water Fund - 6$
Sherwood 3.5$ 5$ 3$ MACC 3$ n/a
Tigard 3.5$ 3$ 3$ 5$ 3$ n/a
Tualatin 3.5$ 3$ 3$ 5$ to MACC of 3$ n/a
which 1/2 to City
West Linn provided actual dollar amounts which they receive.
Wilsonville 3.5$ 3$ 3$ 5$ 3$ n/a
* Free service to City Hall, some municipal facilities.
** City can use poles to string wire. Telephone poles as well .
*** Considering adding Metro "pass through changes."
**** PNB seeking to modify to eliminate deregulated items.
City considering f r nchising long distance services.
ff UTILFEE.LSM (09/17/87)
A Review of Technical Water Quality Issues in the
Tualatin Basin and an Identification of Remaining Needs
Aesthetics, contact recreation, �water supply, irrigation, and
fisheries are major beneficial uses listed in the statewide water
quality management plan for the Tualatin River. These uses have
also been identified as being of greatest concern to the Tualatin
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) . The purpose of this report is
to review the issues and to highlight those technical questions in
need of resolution.
Specific topics unique to each beneficial use will be addressed
separately. However, there has been one theme which continually
surfaces in all discussions: appropriate stream classifications
and use attainability. ORS 468.710(2) outlines the water
pollution control policy in Oregon which is: "To protect,
maintain, and improve the quality of the waters of the state for
public water supplies, for the propagation of wildlife, fish, and
aquatic life, and for domestic, agricultural,, industrial,
municipal, recreational and other legitimate beneficial uses. "
The Federal Clean Water Act also requires water quality sufficient
to protect fish and to provide for recreation as interim national
goals, wherever attainable.
The Department does not consider elimination of any beneficial use
listed for the Tualatin River to be a viable water quality
management option. Both state and federal law make this point
quite clear. However, the level each beneficial use might be able
to attain differs throughout the Tualatin Basin. Reaches which
can support trout, salmon,, and steelhead obviously differ from
those which support only bass and other warm-water species.
Likewise, there are stream segments which are suitable for
swimming while others may lack needed attributes such as
sufficient depth. Different physical characteristics are
legitimate reasons for specifying a different level of a
beneficial, use.
The framework for acknowledging these differences already exists
in the Oregon Water Quality Standirds. Varying levels of
dissolved oxygen in the Willamette River is one example. The
Department has agreed to clarify various beneficial use
classifications and the corresponding criteria values for Tualatin
Basin streams. Specific needs will be discussed in each section.
Fisheries and Aquatic Life
OAR 340-41-442 (Table 6) lists the type of fish and aquatic life
uses for which water quality will be managed. Information on
fisheries in the Tualatin was presented to the TAC by the
Department of Fish & Wildlife (ODFW) . The lower Tualatin does not
have the physical characteristics required to support salmonid
fish spawning and rearing, although these uses are currently
identified in OAR 340-41-442. A consensus recommendation of the
TAC-to the Department appears to be initiating the steps to modify
Table 6 of OAR 340-41-442 to reflect the attainable fish and
aquatic life uses in the ;Tualatin Basin. A classification system
similar to the one used by ODFW could be proposed. Three levels
of classification used by ODFW are defined in the Forest Practices
Act (OAR 629-24-101) . These levels are summarized in attachment
1.
The water quality parameter of primary concern to fish and other
aquatic life in the Tualatin River is dissolved oxygen (DO) . The
DO content in the Tualatin River is adversely affected by the
ammonia loads discharged from thewastewatertreatment plants at
Rock Creek and Durham. These loads can be controlled to :
acceptable levels at the treatment facilities to meet the TMDL for
ammonia proposed to be established for the river. It appears to
be the consensus of the TAC that controlling ammonia in the
Tualatin River will bring dissolved oxygeih back to attainable
levels, thus protecting fish and aquatic life.
Water Supply and Irrigation
Water supplies for both public and private uses require that the
raw water receive adequate pretreatment (filtration and
disinfection) and have natural quality that meets drinking water
standards (Table 5, OAR 340-41-362) .
Irrigation is the major consumptive use of water in the Tualatin
Basin. The overall water quality necessary to irrigate the
diversity of crops grown in the basin is satisfactory. Many of
the same parameters (e.g. total dissolved solids, heavy metals,
pesticides, etc. ) that may affect plant growth would also have
adverse effects on domestic water use and on fish and -other
aquatic life. Of these threecategoriesof water use, however,
irrigation water is the least sensitive to most chemical
constituents. Thus, water quality standards are established to
protect the most sensitive uses, which should adequately serve all
other uses.
Aesthetics and Recreation
Of all the beneficial uses on the Tualatin River, water contact
recreation and aesthetic quality have stimulated the most
controversy. No arguments have been presented which provide a
technical basis for eliminating these uses in the lower Tualatin
River. The lower Tualatin River has the physical characteristics
required to support swimming. There is sufficient depth in the
river and water temperatures are wzirm enough in the summer.
Water quality criteria needed to protect water contact recreation
has been discussed nationally for many years. Parameters which
have been suggested for establishing numerical limits include
microbiological contamination, temperature, pH, and clarity. In
Oregon, criteria values have been adopted for fecal coliform
bacteria, temperature, and pH. No numerical limit has been
established for clarity. However, the TAC has discussed Secchi
disc depth as an alternative to chlorophyll a for addressing
aesthetics.
The sanitary cleanliness of the river for contact recreation is
based on the fecal coliform standard. This standard is exceeded
occasionally during the summer. The effluent discharged from USA
is disinfected and meets the ambient fecal coliform standard.
During periods of fecal coliform violations, in the Tualatin, high
levels have been observed in Beaverton, Fanno, and Rock Creeks.
Thus, it appears that non-point sources in the urbanized areas of
Washington County may threaten swimming in the lower Tualatin
River.
The TAC has expressed concern over viruses potentially entering
the Tualatin River via wastewater discharges from hospitals in
Washington County. Wastewaters emanating from hospitals and
medical clinics discharge to the sewerage systems maintained and
operated by USA. The two treatment facilities that discharge
during the primary recreation season -- Rock Creek and Durham --
provide a high degree of treatment which includes precipitation
and filtration in addition to conventional secondary treatment and
then disinfection. This advanced level of treatment is designed
to remove most of the suspended solids in the wastewater. Because
bacteria and viruses are often associated with suspended material;
concentrations of these organisms should also be reduced.
However, the extent of removal and whether viruses remain in the
effluent discharged from these facilities is unknown.
The relation of pH to eye irritation has provided a basis for
establishing pH• criteria to protect contact recreation
(Water Quality Standards, FWPCA, 1968) . Toxicity due to pH
increases in severity as pH deviates from the normal range.
Changes in pH also causes shifts in metalic complexes. These
changes may increase the toxicity of these metals. During the
summer months, the pH standard is exceeded in the lower Tualatin
River. The cause of these violations is algal photosynthesis
which uses up carbon dioxide, thus increasing the pH.
Excessive algae also affects the clarity of the lower Tualatin
River in the summer. An attempt to deal with nuisance
phytoplankton growth was made in 1986 revisions to the Oregon
Water Quality Standards. A guideline value of 15 ug/L chlorophyll
a was established as a trigger level which identifies water bodies
where phytoplamkton may impair the recognized beneficial uses (OAR
340-41-150) . The recommendation of some members of the TAC was to
look at a Secchi disc guideline for appropriatness.
Secchi disc readings provide an approximation of transparency of
water to light. These measurements rely on a subjective
determination which is strongly influenced by numerous conditions
such as ,sunlight intensity and surface reflection. The influence
of velocity, suspended solids, and other factors have limited the
use of secchi disc in river assessments.
This past summer's Tualatin monitoring program included
observations of both Secchi disc and chlorophyll a. The data
indicates that Secchi disc depth (or clarity) increases as
chlorophyll a decreases. Thus, controlling algae as expressed as
chlorophyll a will lead to the same goal as a Secchi disc goal.
In the case of the Tualatin, it does seem appropriate to use
Secchi disc observations to help refine a chlorophyll a guideline.
Phosphorus TMDL
The results of the Secchi disc / chlorophyll a monitoring data
from this summer-'s Tualatin work are consistent with other
studies. Reducing algae will improve clarity, and thus, improve
the recreational and aesthetic value of the river. The next step
is to address the question of how is algal growth best
controlled.
Algal assays have been used to identify phosphorus as a limiting
nutrient in the Tualatin. Study results indicate that a
phosphorus concentration of approximately 0.10 mg/L is required to
significantly decrease algal growth in the lower Tualatin River.
This value is consistent with recommendations from studies done in
other parts of the U.S. In fact, some states have set phosphorus
limits of 0.05 mg/L. (Water Quality Standards Criteria Summaries,
1980, includes: California, Colorodo, Hawaii, Utah, )
Given the proposed TMDL, the Department views the major questions
facing the TAC are:
o What are the technical alternatives needed to meet the
phosphorus TMDL.;
0 What are the costs associated with the various control
:;trategies?
Summary
0 Aesthetics, contact recreation, water supply, irrigation, and
fisheries are the major beneficial uses of concern to the
TAC.
0 DEQ does not consider elimination of any beneficial use
listed for the Tualatin River to be a viable water quality
ranagement option.
o The Department has agreed to clarify various beneficial use
classifications and corresponding criteria values for
Tualatin basin streams.
o A consensus recommendation of the TAC to the Department is to
modify OAR 340-41-442 to reflect attainable fish and aquatic
life uses in the Tualatin Basin (See attachment 1) .
o The TAC feels that controlling ammonia in the Tualatin with
the proposed TMDL will bring dissolved oxygen back to
attainable levels, thus protecting fish and aquatic life.
o Water quality in the upper Tualatin appears adequate to
protect water supply and irrigation needs.
o The lower Tualatin River has the physical characteristics
required to support swimming, but water quality needed to
support this use is questionable, thus making aesthetics and
recreation the most controversial issue.
o Water quality parameters which have been suggested to protect
recreation include microbiological contamination, clarity,
temperature, and pH.
o The fecal coliform standard in the lower Tualatin River is
occasionally violated during the summer apparently due to
non-point sources in the urbanized areas of. Washington
County.
o The USA facilities provide a high degree of treatment,
including precipitation and filtration, but it is unknown
whether viruses remain in the discharged effluent.
o The pH standard in the lower Tualatin River is currently
violated on occassion in the summer due to algal
photosynthesis.
o Excessive algal growth affects the clarity of the lower
Tualatin River during summer months.
o Algal assays have shown that phosphorus is a limiting
nutrient at times in the Tualatin River.
o Algal assays, ambient data, literature values, and EPA
guidance indicate that a phosphorus concentration
approximately 0.10 mg/L is needed to significantly reduce
algal growth in the lower Tualatin River.
o The Department needs input from the TAC on technical
alternatives needed to meet the phosphorus TMDL and on the
costs associated with the various control strategies.
o Available information does not permit a detailed analysis of
the fate or effect of toxics in the Tualatin Basin. Limited
results indicate the presence of toxics in the Tualatin is
similar to other urbanized basins in the state and no well
defined toxic problem is apperant.
TAC Recommendations
Proposed standards should include a statistical range which
reflects natural variation.
degwgp : 10/15/87
Attachment 1
Summary of Proposed Stream Classification System
(Revised FPF Handbook Guidaance, OAR 629-24-101)
Class I Waters
Any portions of streams, lakes, estuaries, wetlands, or other
waters which are used for:
Domestic use, icluding drinking, culinary and other household
human use;
Angling;
Water' dependent recreation; or
Spawning, rearing or migration of anadromous or game fish.
Class I-I special Protection
Any class II waters which have a significant influence on
downstream class I waters.
Class II
Any waters which are not class I waters but flow into class I
waters. Class II waters extend as far upstream as there is any
definite channel or bed. Class II waters do not include
unchanneled overland flow, roadside dithces, or other surface
waters which have no surface outlet.
Summary Table, Tualatin River Control Strategies
Phoshprus Order of
Concen- Magnitude Option Description
Option tration at Cost Est.
Farmington
1 112 $158, 000,000 High lime treatment, 2005 flow
2 116 $31,000,000 Out-of-Basin to Columbia, Summer only
3 116 $40,000,000 Effluent Irrigation
4 93 $75,100,000 Partial Irrigation, NPS control, Flow augmentation, Wetlands
5 102 $90,000,000 Out-of-Basin to Columbia, Flow Augmentation from Columbia
6 122 $235,000,000 Upper Tualtin Resevoir, 2005 Flow
7 105 $207,000,000 Upper Resevoir, NPS controls, 2005 flows
8 119 $52, 000,000 Enhanced Treatment, NPS control, Scoggins flow augmentation, 20 mgd
9 108 $75,100,000 Enhanced Treatment, partial Wetland, NPS controls, 20 mgd
10 100 $77,900,000 Enhanced Treatment, Partial Wetland, NPS controls, 2005 flow
11 68 $102, 000,000 Out-of-Basin to Columbia, Columbia flow augmentation, NPS controls
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies
Existing Conditions:
Total Phosphate
Flow Conc. Load
(cfs) (ug/L) (#/day)
Tualatin River Stations ---- ______ _______
Dilley 140 45 34
Golf Course 100 51 27
Rood 140 103 77
***** Farmington 170 386 354
Tributaries ----- ______ -------
Gales Creek 15 75 6
Dairy Creek 30 125 20
Rock Creek 10 300 16
Major Withdrawls ----- ______ -------
Municipal & Industrial -25 45 -6
TVID -40 45 -10
Mainstem Tualatin NPS ---__ ______ -------
Gales to Golf Course 10 56 3
Golf Course to Dairy 5 372 10
Dairy to Rock 5 743 20
Mun. Effluent Disposal (mgd)
Rock Cr. AWTP 13 2400 260
TVID Replacement
Rock Cr Basin Wetland
Dairy Cr Basin Wetland
Flow Augmentation (cfs}
Raise Scoggins flow
Upper Tualatin Dam
Columbia River Import
Rock Creek Basin
Dairy Creek Basin
***** Location of Peak Concentration
I
i Trask River_
1_ 7.75 cfsGal....J
i I j ma+ssb"Crook.Hoa trko 0.0 7! Cr.
. _ i
170 oft,0.939,&my/l.34 leo �.. ..._� 6.07;i�ny,!1, 6 Ib.
Cherry
hGsy �_._ .. 1II1 L
.....�z3 Iof ......_._..._— ......-..-�
Outflow
L ......_.._.._._. ......._. J -> 25 cfs Municipal
I --- -----� I 40 cfs irrigation
tueknFt 0 Dow + Tualatin • colt Course I '
I 40ab, n.04b—%/1. 34 W.! 100—eta.•O.n51=uq/1. 27 Ibe� Dairy Creek -- --�
30 oto. 0.12b sc We
aw
.a
Jackson Be
I 13J of*. ().n73 mq/1, 54 Ibe� 1..
�. 040Yoo
1
'am.16.0.14,.,w%tax w�
1. i
I ki tner odd"
-Tualatin Schematic too oh. 0.103 rnq/l. 77 Ow
I
Peak Algal Growth Period
j !140 ate. 0.103 n.q/1, 77 the /A
RCWW _.. -
Showing flow, Total Phosphorus .�� (1.34-9/1.� NA"Crook
� � �`
Concentration, and Phosphorus 170 Ot&% n.35& "'q/4 354 w. 10 sf.. .3a y�1. 17 Thee ---1
toads, for Summer 1987
i.ca.rtae Cr
170 cto.0.2e aog/1, 230 1b.
1. _.._. _...._ ..._l w
F].nor ! i
170 cte, 0.45 iny,4. 230 Ib.• I
Fanna Cf.
-_. ... ......_ .._. ._._....._ , ,DWTP 4.5 of.. o.ln �„�. 15 lbs,
i B"nes Ferry
_..__.�
i 107 afe. n.3! mj/1. 303 lbs 1
I �.... ...._. .._�, 57 cfs to
r.._._ . . _..._.. _ . ... . ; I lake Oswego
scen.ra
t i 140 efe, n.o4r. mj/1, 202 lbs! i
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies
Option 1: High lime treatment at Rock Creek With 2005 design Flow
Total Phosphate
Flow Conc. Load
(cfs) (ug/L) (#/day Costs
Tualatin River Stations ----- ------ ------ -----
Dilley 140 45 34
Golf Course 100 51 27
Rood 140 103 77
Farmington 193 112 117
Tributaries ----- ------ -------
Gales Creek 15 75 6
Dairy Creek 30 124 20
Rock Creek 10 297 16
Major Withdrawls ----- ------ -------
Municipal & Industrial -25 45 -6
TVID -40 45 -10
Mainstem Tualatin NPS ----- ------ -------
Gales to Golf Course 10 56 3
Golf Course to Dairy 5 372 10
Dairy to Rock 5 743 20
----- ------ -------
Mun. Effluent Disposal (mgd)
Rock Cr. AWTP 28 100 23 $158,000,000
TVID Replacement 0
Rock Cr Basin Wetland 0 200 0
Dairy Cr Basin Wetland 0 200 0 '
Flow Augmentation (;fs) ------ -------
Raise Scoggins flow 0 45 0
Upper Tualatin Dam 0 45 0
Columbia River Import
Rock Creek Basin 0 50 0
Dairy Creek Basin 0 50 0
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies
option 2: * Rock Creek effluent to Columbia (summer only)
Total Phosphate
Flow Conc. Load
(cfs) (ug/L) (#/day Costs
Tualatin River Stations ----- ------ ------ -----
Dilley 140 45 34
Golf Course 100 51 27
Rood 140 103 77
***** Farmington 150 116 93
Tributaries ----- ------ -------
Gales Creek 15 75 6
Dairy Creek 30 124 20
Rock Creek 10 297 16
Major Withdrawls ----- ------ -------
Municipal & Industrial -25 45 -6
TVID -40 45 -10
Mainstem Tualatin NPS ----- ------ -------
Gales to Golf Course 10 56 3
Golf Course to Dairy 5 372 10
Dairy to Rock 5 743 20
----- ------ -------
Mun. Effluent Disposal (mgd)
Rock Cr. AWTP 0 3000 0 $31,000,000
TVID Replacement 0
Rock Cr Basin Wetland 0 200 0
Dairy Cr Basin Wetland 0 200 0
----- ------ -------
Flow Augmentation (cfs)
Raise Scoggins flow 0 45 0
Upper Tualatin Dam 0 45 0
Columbia River Import
Rock Creek Basin 0 50 0
Dairy Creek Basin 0 50 0
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies
Option 3: * Rock Creek AWTP effluent irrigation
(No replacement of flow)
Total Phosphate
Flow Conc. Load
(cfs) (ug/L) (#/day Costs
Tualatin River Stations ----- ------ ------ -----
Dilley 140 45 34
Golf Course 100 51 27
Rood 140 103 77
***** Farmington 150 116 93
Tributaries ----- ------ -------
Gales Creek 15 75 6
Dairy Creek 30 124 20
Rock Creek 10 297 16
Major Withdrawls ----- ------ -------
Municipal & Industrial -25 45 -6
TVID -40 45 -10
Mainstem Tualatin NPS ----- ------ -------
Gales to Golf Course 10 56 3
Golf Course to Dairy 5 372 10
Dairy to Rock 5 743 20
--- ------------ -------
Mun. Effluent Disposal (mgd)
Rock Cr. AWTP 0 3000 0 $40,000,000
TVID Replacement 0
Rock Cr Basin Wetland 0 200 0
Dairy Cr Basin Wetland 0 200 0.,
Flow Augmentation (cfs)
Raise Scoggins flow 0 45 0
Upper Vialatin Dam 0 45 0
Columbia River Import
Rock Creek Basin. 0 50 0
Dairy Creek Basin 0 50 0
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies
Option 4: * Rock Creek AWTP effluent partial irrigation
(replacement of flow from TVID)
* Identify and control urban/rural non-point sources
* increase flow from Scoggins for flow augmentation
* Develop wetland areas for municipal effluent disposal
Total Phosphate
Flow Conc. Load
(cfs) (ug/L) (#/day Costs
Tualatin River Stations ----- ------ ------ -----
Dilley 160 39 34
Golf Course 136 43 31
Rood 185 64 64
Farmington 213 93 107
Tributaries ----- ------ -------
Gales Creek 15 75 6
Dairy Creek 39 108 23 $3,500,000
Rock Creek 19 174 18 $5,500,000
Major Withdrawls ----- ------ -------
Municipal & Industrial -25 45 -6
TVID ~25 45 -6
Mainstem Tualatin NPS ----- ------ -------
Gales to Golf Course 10 56 3
Golf Course to Dairy 5 186 5 $1,500,000
Dairy to Rock 5 186 5 $1,500,000
--- -------
Mun. Effluent Disposal (mgd)
Rock Cr. AWTP 6 500 25 $40,000,000
TVID Replacement 10
Rock Cr Basin Wetland 6 200 10 $8,400,000
Dairy Cr Basin Wetland 6 200 10 . $14,700,000
----- ------ -------
Flow Augmentation (cfs)
Raise Scoggins flow 0 45 0
Upper Tualatin Dam 0 45 0
Columbia River Import
Rock Creek Basin 0 50 0
Dairy Creek Basin 0 50 0
$75,100,000
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies
Option 5: * Rock Creek AWTP effluent to Columbia
* Import Columbia River wter through the same Tunnel
(Water put in Tualatin Tributaries)
Total Phosphate
Flow Conc. Load
(cfs) (ug/L) (#/day Costs
_ Tualatin River Stations ----- ------ ------ -----
Dilley 140 45 34
Golf Course 100 51 27
Rood 160 96 83
***** Farmington 190 102 104
Tributaries ----- ------ -------
Gales Creek 15 75 6
Dairy Creek 50 95 26
Rock Creek 30 133 22
Major Withdrawls ----- ------ -------
Municipal & Industrial -25 45 -6
TVID -40 45 -10
Mainstem Tualatin NPS ----- ______ -------
Gales
_ ____Gales to Golf Course 10 56 3
Golf Course to Dairy 5 372 10
Dairy to Rock 5 743 20 .
----- ------ -------
Mun. Effluent Disposal (mgd)
Rock Cr. AWTP 0 1500 0 $90,000, 000
TVID Replacement 0
Rock Cr Basin Wetland 0 0
Dairy Cr Basin Wetland 0 0
Flow Augmentation (cfs)
Raise Scoggins flow 0 45 0
Upper Tualatin Dam 0 45 0
Columbia River Import
Rock Creek Basin 20 50 5
Dairy Creek Basin 20 50 5
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies
Option 6: * Upper Tualatin resevoir project
* Enhanced chemical treatment at Rock Creek
(2005 design flow)
Total Phosphate
Flow Conc. Load
(cfs) (ug/L) (#/day Costs
Tualatin River Stations ----- ------ ------
Dilley 340 45 82
Golf Course 300 47 76
Rood 340 69 126
Farmington 393 122 259
Tributaries ----- ------ -------
Gales Creek 15 75 6
Dairy Creek 30 125 20
Rock Creek 10 300 16
Major Withdrawls ----- ------ -------
Municipal & Industrial -25 45 -6
TVID -40 45 -10
Mainstem Tualatin NPS ----- ------ -------
Gales to Golf Course 10 56 3
Golf Course to Dairy 5 372 10
Dairy to Rock 5 743 20
----- ------ -------
Mun. Effluent Disposal (mgd)
Rock Cr. AWTP 28 Soo 117 $40,000, 000
TVID Replacement 0
Rock Cr Basin Wetland 0 0
Dairy Cr Basin Wetland 0 0
----- ------ -------
Flow Augmentation (cfs)
Raise Scoggins flow 0 45 0
Upper Tualatin Dam 200 45 48 $195,000,000
Columbia River Import
Rock Creek Basin 0 50 0
Dairy Creek Basin 0 50 0
$235,000,000
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies
Option 7: * Upper Tualatin Reservoir project
* Enhanced chemical treatment at Rock Creek
(2005 design flow)
Identify and control non-point sources
Total Phosphate
Flow Conc. Load
(cfs) (ug/L) (#/day Costs
Tualatin River Stations ----- ------ ------ -----
Dilley 340 45 82
Golf Course 300 47 76
Rood 340 53 97
Farmington 393 105 221
Tributaries ----- ------ -------
Gales Creek 15 75 6
Dairy Creek 30 93 15 $5,500,000
Rock Creek 10 149 8 $3,500,000
Major Withdrawls ----- ------ -------
Municipal & Industrial -25 45 -6
TVID -40 45 -10
Mainstem Tualatin NPS, ----- ------ -------
Gales to Golf Course 10 56 3
Golf Course to Dairy 5 112 3 $1,500,000
Dairy to Rock 5 112 3 $1,500,000
----- ------ -------
Mun. Effluent Disposal (mgd)
Rock Cr. AWTP 28 500 117 $40,000,000
TVID Replacement 0
Rock Cr Basin Wetland 0 200 0
Dairy Cr Basin Wetland 0 200 0.,
----- ------ -------
Flow Augmentation (Cfs)
Raise Scoggins flow 0 45 0
Upper Tualatin Dam 200 45 48 $195,999,999
Columbia River Import
Rock Creek Basin 0 50 0
Dairy Creek Basin 0 50 0
$207,999,999
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies
option 8: * Enhanced chemical treatment at Rock Creek
(20 mgd design flow)
* Identify and control urban/rural non-point sources
* Increase flow from Scoggins
Total Phosphate
Flow Conc. Load
(cfs) (ug/L) (#/day Costs
Tualatin River Stations ----- ------ ------ -----
Dilley 190 45 46
Golf Course 150 46 37
Rood 190 55 56
Farmington 231 119 148
Tributaries ----- ------ -------
Gales Creek is 75 6
Dairy Creek 30 so 13 $3,500,000
Rock Creek 10 150 8 $5,500,000
Major Withdrawls ----- ------ -------
Municipal & Industrial -25 45 -6
TVID -40 45 -10
Mainstem Tualatin NPS ----- ------ -------
Gales to Golf Course 10 19 1
Golf course to Dairy 5 74 2 $1,500,000
Dairy to Rock 5 149 4 $1,500,000
----- ------ -------
Mun. Effluent Disposal (mgd)
Rock Cr. AWTP 20 500 83 $40,000, 000
TVID Replacement 0 0
Rock Cr Basin Wetland 0 0
Dairy Cr Basin Wetland 0 0-
----- ------ -------
Flow Augmentation (cfs)
Raise Scoggins flow 50 45 12
Upper Tualatin Dam 0 45 0
Columbia River Import
Rock Creek Basin 0 50 0
Dairy Creek Basin 0 50 0
$52,000, 000
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies
Option 9: * Enhanced Chemical Treatment at Rock Creek
( 20 mgd design flow)
* Partial wetland treatment of effluent
* Identify and control non-point sources
Total Phosphate
Flow Conc. Load
(cfs) (ug/L) (#/day Costs
Tualatin River Stations ----- ------ ------ -----
Dilley 140 45 34
Golf-Course 100 51 27
Rood 149 67 54
***** Farmington 181 108 106
Tributaries ----- ------ -------
Gales Creek 15 75 6
Dairy Creek 39 108 23 $3,500,000
Rock Creek 19 174 18 $5,500,000
Major Withdrawls ----- ------ -------
Municipal & Industrial -25 45 -6
TVID -40 45 -10
Mainstem Tualatin NPS ----- ------ -------
Gales to Golf Course 10 56 3
Golf Course to Dairy 5 74 2 $1,500,000
Dairy to Rock 5 74' 2 . $1,500,000
----- ------ -------
Mun. Effluent Disposal (mgd)
Rock Cr. AWTP 8 500 33 $40,000,000
TVID Replacement 0
Rock Cr Basin Wetland 6 200 10 $8,400,000
Dairy Cr Basin Wetland 6 200 10 .- $14,700, 000
----- ------ -------
Flow Augmentation (cfs)
Raise Scoggins flow 0 45 0
Upper Tualatin Dam 0 45 0
Columbia River Import
Rock Creek Basin 0 50 0
Dairy Creek Basin 0 50 0
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies $75,100,000
Option 9: * Enhanced Chemical Treatment at Rock Creek
( 20 mgd design flow)
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies
option 10 * Enhanced Chemical Treatment at Rock Creek
( 2005 design flow)
• Partial wetland treatment of effluent
• 'Identify and control non-point sources
Total Phosphate
Flow Conc. Load
(cfs) (ug/L) (#/day Costs
Tualatin River Stations ----- ------ ------ -----
Dilley 190 45 46
Golf Course 150 49 39
Rood 206 66 73
Farmington 243 100 131
Tributaries ----- ------ -------
Gales Creek 15 75 6
Dairy Creek 46 121 30 $3,500,000
Rock Creek 26 180 25 $5,500,000
Major Withdrawls ----- ------ -------
Municipal & Industrial -25 45 -6
TVID -40 45 -10
Mainstem Tualatin NPS ----- ------ -------
Gales to Golf Course 10 56 3
Golf Course to Dairy 5 74 2 $1,500,000
Dairy to Rock 5 74 2 $1,500,000
----- ------ -------
Mun. Effluent Disposal (mgd)
Rock Cr. AWTP a 500 33 $40,000,000
TVID Replacement 0
Rock Cr Basin Wetland 10 200 17 $9,800,000
Dairy Cr Basin Wetland 10 200 17.' $16,100,000
----- ------ -------
Flow Augmentation (cfs)
Raise Scoggins flow 50 45 12
Upper Tualatin Dam 0 45 0
Colinibia, River Import
Rock Creek Basin 0 50 0
Dairy Creek Basin 0 50 0
$77,900,000
Tualatin River Analysis of Control Strategies
Option 11 * Rock Creek AWTP effluent to Columbia
* Import Columbia River wter through the same Tunnel
(Water put in Tualatin Tributaries)
* Identify and control urban/rural non-point sources
Total Phosphate
Flow Conc. Load
(cfs) (ug/L) (#/day Costs
Tualatin River Stations ----- ------ ------ -----
Dilley 140 45 34
Golf Course 100 51 27
Rood 160 65 56
Farmington 190 68 69
Tributaries ----- ------ -------
Gales Creek is 75 6
Dairy Creek 50 68 18 $3,500, 000
Rock Creek 30 83 13 $5,500,000
Major Withdrawls ----- ------ -------
Municipal & Industrial -25 45 -6
TVID -40 45 -10
Mainstem Tualatin NPS ----- ------ -------
Gales to Golf Course 10 56 3
Golf Course to Dairy 5 186 5 $1,500,000
Dairy to Rock 5 186 5 $1,500, 000
----- ------- -------
Mun. Effluent Disposal (mgd)
Rock Cr. AWTP 0 1500 0 $90,000, 000
TVID, Replacement 0
Rock Cr Basin Wetland 0 0
Dairy Cr Basin Wetland 0 0
Flow Augmentation (cfs)
Raise Scoggins flow 0 45 0
Upper Tualatin Dam 0 45 0
Columbia River Import
Rock Creek Basin 20 50 5
Dairy Creek Basin 20 50 5
$102, 000,000
METRU
Memorandum
2000 S.W.First Avenue
Portland,OR 97201-5,398
503!221-1646
Date: Nov.16, 1987
To: All Monthly Report recipients
From: Charlotte Becker
Recycling Information Center coordinator
Re: Changes in the Monthly Report
Many things have changed in the Recycling Information
Center since you last received Metro's Monthly Report.
The staff is new, the volume of calls has reached a new
high and the Monthly Report has a new look, as you'll soon
see.
These changes made it necessary to combine two
months of information into one report. We hope you find
the report useful and that you find it more readable.
If you no longer wish to receive the Monthly Report,
please call me at. 221-1646, ext. 224, and I'll remove
your name from the mailing list. Or if you have
suggestions for articles or comments about the report,
I'd like to hear from you.
...........................................................
Recycling
Information
Center
Monthly Report0\'� �\N� �tPj.
September/October 1987 p�p.
NN.................................................... .
METRO
.. . . .. . . ... . . . ... .. . ... . .. ..... .... . .. .. . ..... . . .. ... .. . .. .
Metro's Recycling Information Center was established
in 1979 to provide the tri-county region with a central
resource for recycling and waste reduction information.
This combination report/newsletter is published monthly
and gives a summary of the source of calls received,the
type of service requested and the total number of calls for
each recyclable material.
A brief market report,an update on current Metro
activities and a regional events calendar are also included
for your information.
To find out more about recycling,call or write:
Metro Recycling Information Center
2000 S.W.First Ave.
Portland,OR 97201
224-5555
... .. .. ... . . . ... . . . .. .. . . .... ..... .. ... .... ... .. . .. .
-1
. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . . .. .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . ... .. . ... . .. .. . . . . .. .
f
I
I
t
OUR BIGGEST WASTE PROBLEM IS
RIGHT IN YOUR OWN BACKYARD.
Yard debris consumes more space in our landfills than any other single
material.In fact,residents of the Portland area alone discard enough
leaves,branches and clippings to fill Pioneer Courthouse Square 10 feet
deep,t ere,kcek!
What a waste.Of landfill space and of valuable resources.Because as
you'll read in our free brochures,your yard clippings METRO
could be recycled and reused.
M RECYCLE,CUL 224-5555.
That's the theme of Metro's fall yard debris campaign.Ads with
that message have been cropping up in community newspapers
in the region.
. .. . . . . .. .. . ... . . . . .. ...... . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. ... .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recycling Information Center news
There have been some changes in our staff since the last
monthly report.
Marvin Aultman has moved on to a career in accounting.
We all wish him good luck for the future.
A new coordinator and two new office assistants have
been hired to maintain the steady flow of recycling infor-
mation to those who request it.
Charlotte Becker,a graduate of the University of Portland
who has been involved in office recycling programs,came
aboard as coordinator on Oct. 19.She will be working with
the public affairs department to implement a number of
the programs planned for 1988,as well as supervising the
operation of the Recycling Information Center.
Gina Granato,a former interpreter for the deaf with
Portland Public Schools,joined the staff on Sept. 14 as an
office assistant.
Cathy Howatt,who has worked in the Recycling Informa-
tion Center since September 1986 through the Portland
Private Industry Council,became a full-fledged member of
the staff on Sept.21.She is also an office assitant.
. .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . ... . .. .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . .. .
Current events
Recycling awareness: the focus for the first week
of October
Oct.3-10 was Recycling Awareness Week.To announce
the statewide event,Portland metropolitan area recyclers 4k,
joined together to run an ad in the Oct.2 issue of The
Oregonian;14 businesses in the area also displayed
banners proclaiming the event.
Recycling Day at the Zoo kicked off the week's activities
on Oct.3.Eighteen governmental agencies and businesses
participated in the all-day event,which gave 3,500 people
more information about recycling and how it helps the
environment.
Children and their parents were issued maps showing nine
stops located throughout the zoo.Each stop focused on a
different recycable material,some with games,others with
displays.
The week continued with composting seminars presented
by McFarlane's Bark,the Environmental Learning Center
and the city of West Linn.Recognition awards were given
by the Metro Council to the city of Portland and Grimm's
Fuel Company for their efforts in recycling.
The week ended with a teacher in-service on Oregon's new 1
recycling curriculum.The in-service was sponsored by
Clackamas County and Metro.Twenty-two teachers from
grades 3 through 12 toured Owens-Illinois Glass Com-
pany, participated in recycling demonstrations and
received copies of the curriculum to use in introducing
recycling into their classrooms.
.... ......... ... ......... ... ...... . .................
d
. . .. . . . ... . .. . ... ...... ..... . . . . .. . .. . .. .......... .. ... . .. .
Wt%fot some
wild ideas
about recycling
Recycling Awareness Day
at the Zoo
Saturday, October 3
10 a.m. -4 p.m.
Special games;recycling displays;entertainment
Recycling saves evergy,natural resources and
wildlife habitat
Recycling Information:2245555
METRO
Recycling Awareness Day at the Zoo focuses on how recycling
saves energy,natural resources and wildlife.
... . .. ... .. . ....... .. . . . . .. . .. .... ...... ........ ....
Y
...... ...... . . ....-........................................
Operation Phone Book brings Lions to Metro
,in November
Metro is again participating in Operation Phone Book,a
campaign in which metropolitan area Lions Clubs collect
old telephone books and sell the recyclable newsprint.Last '
year,493 tons of phone books were collected,raising
$14,000 for the Lions Sight and Hearing Foundation and
diverting those books from the St.Johns Landfill.
This year,Metro has negotiated with phone companies
in the area to include an insert in new telephone books
encouraging people to recycle at the 25 Lions drop boxes
in Clackamas,Washington and Multnomah counties.
Metro is also providing phone and office support in the
Recycling Information Center to Lions members who will
be contacting major phone book users and coordinating
large-volume pick-up.
A list of Lions phone book drop sites,as well as other
sites in the metropolitan region where phone books are
accepted,is available through the Recycling Information
Center.For the drop box nearest you,call 224-5555.
. .. .. .. .... . . .... ................... .... ... .........
c
}
. ... ... ... .. . ..... .. .... . . .. .. . .... .. . ... ... .... . . .. .. . . ...
Market report
September and October 1987
SEPTEMBER OCTOBER
MATERIAL HIGH LOW AVG. HIGH LOW AVG.
NEWSPRINT $41ton $30ton $39ton $56ton $35ton $47ton
CARDBOARD . 60 40 53 56 35 51
WHITE LEDGER 100 50 68 100 50 69
COL.LEDGER 45 20 34 46 20 38
COMP.PAPER 196 120 152 196 120 157
TAB CARDS 190 120 152 190 75 144
GLASS B k C) 30 20 25 40 20 30
GLASS(GR) 30 20 25 40 20 30
TIN CANS 20 10 15 20 10 15
ALUMINUM .461b. .051b. .171b. .451b. .021b. .191b.
CANS .37 .09 .24 .38 .09 .19
FOIL .10 .05 .08 .15 .04 .10
UNCLEAN .20 .05 .12 .15 .02 .08
SHEET/CAST .46 .40 .43 .45 .26 .35
... ... ..... .. .. . . . . ... . . ... . ..... . ......... .. . . .. ...
. ......... .................... ...... .......................
Market report (September 1986/October 1986 and September 1987/October
Dollars/ton
0 20 40 60
Newsprint
Cardboard q
Ledger
paper-
white :z :
Ledger
paper-
colored
Computer
paper
Tab cards
Glass
(brown and
clear)
Glass
(green) .....
Tin cans
Cents/pound
0 10 20 30
Aluminum
• 3
1987)
80 100 120 140 1¢0
Sept. 1986
. Oct. 1986
® Sept. 1987
Oct. 1987
• '. . .. .. . .. . . ..... . .... ....... ....... .... ... ....... ...
Monthly report
August 1987 - September 1987
AUG'87 %OF SEP IV %OF
CALLS CALLS
TOTAL CALLS 1,359 1,002
Average per day 65 46
REQUESTS FOR DROP CENTERS 789 58.06% 452 45.11%
REQUESTS FOR PICK UP 128 9.42% 121 1248%
REQUESTS FOR CURBSIDE 201 14.79% 142 14.17%
REQUESTS FOR MARKETS 124 9.12% 55 50%
REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION 91 6.70% 363 3623%
REQUESTS FOR WRITTEN
INFORMATION 108 182
Handbooks 16 14.81% 112 61,54%
General packet 68 6296% 43 23.63%
Office packet 2 125% 2 110%
Market list 6 556% 0 0.00%
Other 16 14.81% 25 13.74%
SOURCE OF CALLS
Multnomah County 26 1.91% 50 4.99%
Washington County 227 16.70% 152 15.17%
Clackamas County 159 11.70% 135 13.47%
City of Portland 971 6821% 655 65.37%
West Linn 4 029% 6 0.60%
Out of region 16 118% 4 OAO%
MATERIAL REQUESTS %chg.
Newsprint 393 141 -6412%
Glass 286 140 -8145%
Cardboard 130 74 -43.08%
O'n.e P°Ner 18 10 4044%
Scrap paper/mag/phone 175 77 .56.00%
Tin cans 197 98 5025%
Scrap metal/aluminum 190 68 6421%
Plastic 47 29 3830%
Tires 46 25 45.65%
Motor oil 139 91 3453%
Yard debris 139 289 10791%
Miscellaneous 124 80 35.48%
Special waste 37 27 -27.03%
Garbage 35 16 5429%
... ... ...... ...................... ..................
10
....... . .. . .. ... . .. . ... . .. .. .. . . .. .... .. .. .. .. . . . ... ... ...
September 1987- October 1987
SEP'87 %OF OCT'87 %OF
CALLS CALLS
TOTAL CALLS 1,002 11898
Average per day 46 86
REQUESTS FOR DROP CENTERS 42 45.11% 1053 55.48%
REQUESTS FOR PICK UP 121 12.08% 293 15.44%
REQUESTS FOR CURBSIDE 142 14.17% 242 12.75%
REQUESTS FOR MARKETS 55 5.49% 130 6.85%
REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION 363 36.23% 484 25.50%
REQUESTS FOR WRITTEN
INFORMATION 182 353
Curbside 112 6154% 62 17.56%
General packet 43 23.63% 56 15.86%
Office packet 2 1.10% 5 1.42%
Market list 0 0.00% 2 057%
Yard debris N/A N/A 196 56.09
Other 25 13.74% 30 850%
SOURCE OF CALLS
Multnomah County 50 4.99% 64 337%
Washington County 152 15.17% 244 12.86%
Clackamas County 135 13.47% 225 11.85%
City of Portland 655 6537% 1331 70.13%
West Linn 6 0.60% 20 1.05%
Out of region 4 0.40% 34 1.79%
MATERIAL REQUESTS %chg.
Newsprint 141 196 39.01%
Glass 140 236 68.57%
Cardboard 74 70 5.41%
Office paper 10 17 70.00%
Scrap paper/mag/phone 77 204 164.94%
Tin ons 98 161 64.29%
Scrap metal/aluminum 68 109 60.29%
Plastic 29 63 11724%
Tires 25 32 28.00%
Motor oil 91 164 80.22%
Yard debris 289 626 116.61%
Miscellaneous 80 174 11750%
Special waste 27 43 5926%
Garbage 16 31 913.75%
...... ......... ................ .. .. ...... . ......... .
11
. . .... . . .. .. . . .... . . .... ..... . . . .. . . . . .. ... ...... ... .. . . ...
Year-to-year report
,September 1986 vs. September 1987
SEP*86 %OF SEP'87 %OF
CALLS CALLS
TOTAL CALLS 1,138 1,002
Average per day 54 46
REQUESTS FOR DROP CENTERS 533 46.84% 452 45.11%
REQUESTS FOR PICK UP 318 28.94% 121 12.08%
REQUESTS FOR CURBSIDE N/A 142 14.17%
REQUESTS FOR MARKETS 83 729% 55 5.49%
REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION 204 17.913% 363 3623%
REQUESTS FOR WRITTEN
INFORMATION 131 182
Ha^.".,.; — 17 1198% 112 61.54%
General packet 103 78.63% 43 23.63%
Office packet 4 3.45% 2 1.10%
Market list 1 076% 0 0.00%
Other 6 ,. 25 13.74%
SOURCE OF CALLS
Multnomah County 839 76.83% 50 4.99%
Washington County 149 13.09% 152 15.17%
Clackamas County 134 11.78% 135 13.47%
City of Portland N/A N/A 655 65.37%
West Linn N/A N/A 6 0.60%
Out of region 16 1.41% 4 0.40%
MATERIAL REQUESTS %chg.
Newsprint 317 141 5552%
Glass 324 140 5679%
Cardboard 192 74 -61A6%
Offke paper 20 10 50.00%
Scrap paper/mag/phone 116 77 33.62%
Tmcazu 202 98 51A9%
Scrap metal/aluminum 87 68 21.84%
Plastic 37 29 -21.62
Tires 29 25 1379%
Motor on 48 91 8958%
Yard debris 103 289 18058%
Miscellaneous 111 80 27.93%
Special waste 6 27 350.00%
Garbage 19 16 -15.79%
. .. . . . ..... . . ........... ...... ..................... .
12
.... .. ........ .... . .... . ..... . . . .. ....... .. ............ ....
October 1986 vs. October 1987
OCT'86 %OF OCT'87 %OF
CALLS CALLS
TOTAL CALLS 1,181 1,898
Average per day 51 86
REQUESTS FOR DROP CENTERS 557 47.16% 1053 55.48%
REQUESTS FOR PICK UP 373 3158% 293 15.44%
REQUESTS FOR CURBSIDE N/A N/A 242 12.75%
REQUESTS FOR MARKETS 99 838% 130 6.85%
REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION 152 12.87% 484 2550%
REQUESTS FOR WRITTEN
INFORMATION 212 353
Curbside 91 4292% 62 1756%
General packet 108 50.94% 56 15.86%
Office packet 3 1.42% 5 1.42%
Market list 5 2.36% 2 057%
Yard debris N/A N/A 198 56.09%
Other 15 7.08% 30 850%
SOURCE OF CALLS
Multnomah County 925 78.32% 64 337%
Washington County 109 9.23% 244 12.86%
Clackamas County 125 10.58% 275 11.85%
City of Portland N/A N/A 1331 70.13%
West Linn N/A N/A 20 1.05%
Out of region 22 1.86% 34 1.79%
MATERIAL REQUESTS %chg.
Newsprint 319 196 •3856%
Glass 333 236 29.13%
Cardboard 235 70 -7021%
Office paper 35 17 51.43%
Scrap paper/mag/phone 94 204 117.02%
Tin cans 227 161 -29A7%
Scrap metal/aluminum 83 109 3133%
Plastic 29 63 11724%
Tines 35 32 557%
Motor oil 62 164 16452%
Yard debris 145 626 331.72%
Miscellaneous % 174 81.75%
Spe . waste 4 43 975.00%
Garbage 21 31 47.62%
........... ............. ...... ............. .........
12
Monthly calendar
November 1987
Nov. 1-30 Recycling month at Sandy Transfer
Station sponsored by Mt.Hood Refuse
Nov. 3 New phone books distributed in Portland
Nov.4-Dec.11 Lions Club Operation Phonebook,
volunteers taking calls in Metro Recycling
Information Center for large-volume
(50+) phone book pick-up,10 a.m.-
4 p.m. Monday-Friday
Nov.8 Operation Phonebook begins in Portland;
Metro Recycling Information Center
providing information on drop-site
locations
Nov.10 Association of Oregon Recyclers meeting
at Jefferson Smurfit Newsprint in
Newberg,4 p.m.
Nov. 12 Metro Council meeting,5:30 p.m.
Nov. 16 Great Portland Recycling Reward Route
sponsored by city of Portland begins at
6 a.m., $1,000 prize
Nov.18 Clackamas County Recycling Task Force
meeting at the Clackamas County
Department of Transportation and
Development,3 p.m.
Nov. 21-22 Lions Club large-volume phone book
pick-up
Nov. 24 Metro Council meeting,5:30 p.m.
. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .... .. .. .... .. .. ... . ..... . ... ......
14
. ............... .... .. .. .... ........ . . .. ....... ... ..... ....
Nov.30 New phone book distribution begins in
Washington County;Metro Recycling
Information Center providing information
on drop-site locations
December 1987
Dec.4-23 Holiday Gift Shoppe at Environmental
Learning Center,noon-6 p.m.,dosed
Mondays
Dec.7 Gresham,Sandy,Troutdale and Orient
phone books distributed;Metro Recycling
Information Center providing info on
drop-site locations
Dec.8 Association of Oregon Recyclers meeting,
time and location to be announced
Dec.10 Metro Council meeting,5:30 pm
Dec.10-13, Christmas tree/plant sale at
17-20 Environmental Learning Center,
noon-6 p.m.
Dec.12-13 Lions Club large-volume phone book
pick-up
Dec.22 Metro Council meeting,5:30 p.m.
.... ... ... . . . ............... ...... ...... ..... .. .....
METRO
" c) ,:i
2000 S.W.First Avenue °3
Portland,OR 97201-5398
ix
503!221-1646
KEITH LIDEN
CITY OF TIGARD
PO Box 23397
TIGARD, OR 97223
o
,, v
01fl
P *R *I *D* E-,q,l
DISPOSAL COMPANY
Nov. 16, 198�7()j��
City of Tigard
PO Box 23397 �V7 LJ
Tigard, Or. 97223 7 1987
NOV 1
Atten: Keith Liden CITY OF TIGARD,
RE: Parkwood CT. Apt. PLANNING DEPT,
14010 SW 112th
Tigard
Mr. Liden,
Enclosed please find corrspondence with Al Antonini
regarding rates, service and payments made and
not made.
We are requesting that he pay his bill up currant.
He still refuses to pay the City rate, of which he
should have been charged since April 1, 1986, that
we only started October 1, 1987.
He was being charged for the County rate, when
the apartments were annexed into the city back
in 1965, the address was never changed.
Thank you for giving this your attention.
Kim Gregory
Pride DispFF 803$
Sherwood OR 97140
(503)684-7849
DISPOSAL COMPANY
P. O. Box 839 - Sherwood, OR 97140 - 684-7849
October 8, 1987
Mr. Al Antonini
PO BOX 0090
Hayward, Ca. 94543
RE: Parkwood Ct. Apt.
14010 SW 112th
Tigard, OR. 97223
Mr. Antonini,
Effective October 1, 1987 Parkwood Ct. Apts. will charged for City rates.
The City rate for 3 - 6 yard containers, picked up 1 time per week is
$518.05 per month.
In the past you were being charged for County rates.
Thank You,
Pride Disposal Co.
kg
"Serving Your Community's Entire Needs"
Alfred J. Antonini P.O. Box 0090
Real Estate Investments Hayward, CA 94543-0090
(415) 881-4981
(713) 688-8645
October 21, 1987
Pride Disposal Company
P.O. Box 839
Sherwood, Oregon 97140
RE: Parkwood Ct. Apt.
14010 SW 112th
Tigard, OR. 97223
We are in receipt of your letter, dated October 8, 1987, regarding the
rate increase for weekly pickups effective October 1, 1987. As the
property has not moved we would like an explaination of why we have
received this increase. If possible, we would also appreciate any kind
of back up information you may have justifying an increase.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Via°
e rftonini
AJA/do
T
DISPOSAL COMPANY
P. O. Box • Sherwood, OR 97140 -
820 625-6177
OCTOBER 26, 1987
ALFRED ANTONINI
PO BOX 0090
HAYWARD, CA. 94543-0090
RE: PARKWOOD CT. APTS.
14010 SW 112TH
TIGARD, OR. 97223
Enclosed please find a copy of our City of Tigard and County rates.
We have discovered, while looking into the Parkwood Ct. Apts. , account,
that your complex is in the city of Tigard. The complex was annexed into
the city back in 1965. As we mentioned in the previous letter, we were charging
the County rate of $479.48. You are now being charged the city rates.
Thank You,
Pride Disposal Co.
"Serving Your Community's Entire Needs"
� mn
P *R *1 *D * E
DISPOSAL COMPANY
November 16, 1987
PRIDE DI
PRIDE DISPOSAL COMSPOSAi COMPANIIPANY � �� �;, P o
P
Alfred J. Antonini �s 9TA
�hE W�G� ;F 9-1-11,
PERM:T NC
PO BOX 0900 � u:
Hayward, Ca. 94543 NANGE CHARGE RETURN POSTAGE{ GUARANT(E,
MON'HO IAN
NUA. CENTAGE PATE 1P _ ADDPESE -0RRE'-'
.. - REOUESTF:
RE: Parkwood Ct. Apts. M e 70:
We are requesting payment for past due amount 11-16-87 92003-7
Alfred J. Antonini
by November 25, 1987. Parkwood Ct. Apts. 14010 SW 112th PO BOX 0900
4-14-87 Bal. Due 93.35 Hayward, Ca. 94543
9-22-87 Stop non Pay 5.00
Thank You,
10-22-87 City Rate increase 56.57 !`
Pride Disposal Co. ( ACCOUNT No
154.92 92003-7 154.92
AM' FINANCE CHARG--
FINANCE "HARGE
cc: City of Tigard
kg
P.O.Box 839
Sherwood OR 97140
(503)684-7849
PRIDE DISPOSAL COMPANY
\\ P' BO P POSTAGE PAIC
PERM;'N(:
I
RETURN POSTAGE
GUAFgNTCED
I
DOPr54 COPPE^TICN
.i_FTE"�
t
I�
c:
PARKYCl a CT APTS
/u AL ANTON IN I
14013 Sip ll-'; Th PGR 67
TIuARJ CR y722_3-
ACCOUNT
722_ACCOUNT NO .
y_;)UO3-7 10-67; 16 _+c
I.
02—C—
' �p KINGSWOOD COURT APARTMENTS 1500
ALFRED J. ANTONINI
' 14010 SW 112TH 24-22
19
TIGARD, OREGON 97223 t F7 --,W036
z
PAY TO TH
ORDER OFE $
y DOLLARS
IlWffd Hrme6
_ afad Scan sank
zoamwa
}}
.:. L�LLJ
r !`" lea ;111 e j Ctj ice,
t
_1. 7 iI 1 F
�= x- _ ,mr. s�esr rag:; .i K� 5 Ym i Cmc w:e��:I m•7 rsyc ac ..., s� x
`
:. � Hca+ t`
Management Options (Point Sources )
Some management alternatives have been presented by USA to two
advisory committees for the Tualatin Project. Table
summarizes a range of the alternatives and their estimated
Capital and Operation and Maintenance Costs for summer months
only for USA treatment plants to meet the TMDL requirements .
The costs at 40 MGD are for current USA operation. USA' s flows
are projected to increase from Durham and Rock Creek to about
60 MGD by the year 2005. In addition, USA projects it will
need about $40, 000 , 000 worth of improvements to Durham and Rock
Creek to provide for the increased flow.
Increase Total
Capital Present In User User
Options Flow Costs 0&M Worth Charge Charge
(MGD) ($mil ) ( $mil ) ($mil) (/Mo) (/Mo)
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Irrigation for both 40 62 3 .7 100 7 .00 18 .75
Plants 60 94 5 .6 150 10 .00 21 .75
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
out-of-Basin Discharge for
82 2 . 4 104 7 . 31 19 . 06
both Plants to Columbia 60 120 3 . 4 151 10 .75 22 . 50
-------------------------------------
RC to Columbia and Durham
to Willamette 40 48 1 . 3 56 4 .20 15. 95
60 61 1 .9 79 5 .70 17 . 45
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
RC to Columbia and Durham
High Lime 40 55 2 .2 75 5. 30 17 . 05
60 72 3 . 6 106 7 . 50 19 . 25
------------------------------------
* High Lime Both Plants with
I 40 54 2 . 6 78 5 .60 17 . 35
Irrigation over 40 mgd
60 85 4 . 5 128 9 . 10 20 . 85
___ _ __ __________ --------
*Does not include sludge disposal costs . A 40 mgd lime plant will use
about 40 to 50 tons of raw lime per day and produce 80 tons or 200 yds
of chemical sludge in addition to the 175 yds of biological sludge .