05/13/2002 - Packet Tigard Budget Committee 2002
(Note: Items not completed at scheduled meeting will be held over to following meeting.)
May 13, 2002
6:30 p.m.
Water Building Auditorium
8777 SW Burnham
• Call to order
• Approval of Minutes
• Discussion of Department Budgets
• Finance
• Police
• Community Development
♦ CD Administration
♦ Building Inspection
Current Planning
♦ Long Range Planning
• Engineering
• Street Lights
• CIP
• Debt Service
Public Comment
• Recess Meeting until May 20, 2002
City of Tigard, Oregon
Budget Committee
Meeting Minutes
May 6, 2002
Members Present: Jim Griffith, Brian Moore, Joyce Patton, Sydney Sherwood, Craig
Dirksen, Mike Benner, Ken Scheckla, and George Burgess.
Members Absent: Irene Moszer and Greg Zuffrea.
Staff Present: Bill Monahan, Craig Prosser,Heather Block, Paul Debruyn, and Michelle
Wareing.
Vistors: Emily Tsao, Robin McFall, and Gene McAdams.
Call to Order: George Burgess called the meeting to order at 6:37 PM.
Approval of Minutes: The meeting minutes of May 14, 2001 were approved. MSP
(Motion Second Pass)
Election of Officers: Craig Prosser, Finance Director, stated that nominations need to be
made to elect a new Chair and Secretary. Mike Benner nominated George Burgess for
Chair. Sydney Sherwood seconded the motion. All were in favor of the motion. MSP
Ken Scheckla nominated Mike Benner as Secretary. Joyce Patton seconded the motion.
All were in favor of the motion. MSP
Vision Statement: Craig Prosser presented a Power Point slide show on the Vision
Statement for the City of Tigard and the Council Goals for the year 2002. The City of
Tigard Vision Statement addresses six major goals: community character and quality of
life; growth and growth management; public safety; schools and education; transportation
and traffic; and urban and public services.
Council Goals: The 2002 Council goals included:
Transportation: Explore funding sources, develop intra-city bus service and park and ride
lots, and work with ODOT on state roads.
Parks and Recreation: Complete master plans for City parks, support Youth Forum and
youth activities.
Downtown: Plan for commuter rail station, review zoning and comprehensive plans for
downtown, and work on downtown redevelopment plan.
Water: Continue to evaluate options for long-term water supply.
Growth Management: Evaluate results of Bull Mountain annexation study and develop
course of action, monitor progress of Durham Quarry development, consider ways to
support affordable housing, support implementation of Washington Square Regional
Plan, and evaluate changing the Tigard Post Office branch to the Tigard Post Office.
Library: Support promotion of the library construction bond.
Communication: Meet with local, county, regional, and state partners, improve
communication with Tigard citizens, and support english-as-a-second language programs.
Craig Prosser presented the Committee with the five-year financial plan. The revenue
assumptions are based on past trends, expected changes in consumption, and the
projected economic activity. Personal services expenditures are based on a five percent
plus or minus projected position changes. Materials and services include a three percent
increase plus new requests, minus one-time expenditures. Capital outlay has a projected
three percent increase plus new equipment costs minus non-recurring equipment costs.
The Capital improvement projections are based on the Capital Improvement Plan.
Craig reviewed the five-year forecast for the General Fund, Development Funds, Water
Funds, Road Funds, and Sewer. Funds.
The City will be closing out the Economic Improvement District Fund, the 69`h Avenue
LID Fund, and the Metro Greenspaces Fund. The State and County Gas Tax Fund will
be consolidated, and the Parks SDC, Tree Replacement and Park Levy Improvement
Funds will be consolidated. The Wall Street LID Fund will be added and the Workers'
Compensation Fund will be renamed the Insurance Fund.
Budget Message: Bill Monahan presented the committee with a review of the budget
message. Major issues in the budget include sewer extensions, Bull Mountain
annexation, building activity, the new Library, long term water supply, transportation
funding, Measure 7, and the economy.
The overall Proposed Budget is $26,864,535, which is an increase of 4.3% from last
fiscal year. There is a decrease of.85 positions, and $17,846,506 for Capital
Improvement projects.
Craig pointed out this is the second year of Effectiveness Measures in the budget. Many
departments are continuing to refine these measures.
The other technical change in the budget for this fiscal year is the definition for capital
outlay, which has been changed from $2,500 to $5,000 to comply with GASB 34
requirements.
Budget Hearing Format:
Schedule
Craig Prosser discussed the draft agenda's that were distributed for future meetings. The
Committee agreed that the agendas are acceptable.
Length of Meetings
Future Budget meetings are scheduled for the next two Monday evenings and a possible
third meeting on Wednesday, May 29`". The meetings will be held from 6:30 PM until
9:00 PM.
Department Presentations
This year's budget presentation will include the short departmental summaries that were
presented to the Committee last year for the first time.
Public Comment
The Committee agreed that public comment should continue to be held at the end of the
Budget Committee meetings.
Social Services and Community Events: The Budget Committee Policy sets a target
for Social Services and Community Events grants of 0.5%of the prior year's operating
budget. The target for FY 2002-03 is $128,800. This years budget includes $126,200 for
these grants plus $10,000 formerly budgeted in Community Development, Building
Division for emergency housing assistance.
The Social Services subcommittee had asked for additional information from Tigard
Recreation Association. The Association responded to that request in a letter dated April
16, 2002. A copy of this letter is included in the Budget Committee packets. Robin
McFall from the Tigard Recreation Association was present and updated the Committee
on the Association needs and the reasons for the funding request. Joyce Patton and
Sydney Sherwood responded to Robin with some feedback on the application request and
process that would help for next year.
Craig also brought to the Comrnittee's attention that in February, Council directed that
$10,000 be included in the budget as a set aside for affordable housing. This is not
included in the Proposed Budget and will need to be added.
George Burgess asked where the $10,000 was budgeted prior to this year? Craig
responded that this was a new expenditure.
George also asked why the grant to Luke Dorf doubled this fiscal year? Joyce Patton
responded that Luke Dorf lost some of their funding from another source and asked for
twice as much this year. Because they have been conservative in prior requests, the
Committee agreed to the additional amount.
Joyce Patton updated the Committee on a new grant request received from Art Resources
of Tigard. This is a new program designed to enhance the community arts in Tigard.
The Social Services Subcommittee recommended giving them $3,750 which is half of
their request.
Ken Scheckla expressed a desire to not include the $10,000 for affordable housing in the
Social Services budget, but to add it in contingency. A majority vote was taken whether
or not to add the $10,000 as a line item or to include it in contingency. The final
committee vote was five in favor of adding $10,000 as a line item with criteria to be set at
a later date, and three opposed. MSP
Craig Prosser suggested that next years Social Service Subcommittee be selected. Craig
Dirksen agreed to replace Joyce Patton on the committee and Sydney Sherwood and Greg
Zuffrea will continue for the next year on the committee.
Mayor and Council: Michelle Wareing presented the Committee with the Mayor and
Council and City Administration budget. The overall budget for Mayor and Council is
down 25.70%. This is primarily due to attorney fees being removed from the
professional services line item and placed in City Attorney. There was also a decrease in
travel and training costs.
City Administration: The overall budget for City Administration is up 6.45%. This is
primarily due to an increase in materials and services of 34.38% for fees due to Randall
Corporation. Bill Monahan reported that City Administration is recommending deleting
the amount due to Randall Corporation. This would reduce the budget by$48,000.
Human Resources: Human Resources overall budget is down 4.93%. Once again this is
primarily due to moving labor attorney fees over to the City Attorney budget.
Risk Management: The overall budget for Risk Management is up 19.54%. This
increase is due to significant increases in property and worker's compensation insurance
costs for the entire City, which are budgeted in this Division. Michelle Wareing stated
that she had talked to Loreen Mills, Risk Management Director, whom stated that the
City would be looking at 40% to 50%rate increases for insurance this coming fiscal year.
The Committee suggested looking at self insurance. Craig Prosser responded that self
insurance had been looked at and at this time it is not yet beneficial.
Network Services: The overall budget for Network Services is up 2.68%. Personal
Services is up 22.89%, this is due to a reclassification within the Department and also a
contract increase with OPEU to make Network Technician positions salary comparable to
other jurisdictions. Materials and Services is down 15.88% due to cost savings from the
new phone system and service. Network Services has one budgeted vacant position that
will not be filled until the economy improves.
Paul Debruyn updated the Committee on the accomplishments within the Network
Services division this year. This included increasing the broad band speed to the internet,
additional work with the Police department to help meet more of their needs, improving
the web site, and working with the TV studio.
Paul also updated the Committee on measures being taken by the Department to save
additional money. The new telephone system purchased by a local company named
Eschelon will have an approximate savings of$10,000 a year.
Ken Scheckla asked why more overtime was budgeted compared to last year? Paul
Debruyn responded that it was an oversight not to include overtime in last years budget
and this year it was included.
City Attorney: Beginning in FY 2002-03, all City Attorney costs will be charged to this
budget unit rather than to individual departments. This will include both the City
Attorney and the Labor Attorney. Attorney costs will then be allocated out to the
appropriate City fund via the City's cost allocation program.
Public Comment: There was no public comment.
The Budget Committee recessed at 8:40 PM until May 13, 2002. MSP
May 13, 2002
Sign In Sheet
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Finance
Budget Pages: 170-189
Includes the following divisions: Administration, Financial Operations, Office Services,
Records, and Municipal Court
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 23.75 24.80 23.80 -4.03%
Personal
Services 1,120,967 1,329,420 1,363,460 2.56%
Materials
& Services 322,017 462,299 389,161 -15.82%
Capital
Outlay 4,604 0 15,000 100.00%
Total 1,447,588 1,791,719 1,767,621 -1.34%
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Finance
Division: Administration
Budget Pages: 171-174
Department Results Statement:
♦ The City builds and maintains a strong financial position.
♦ The Finance Department contributes to the attainment of the Tigard Vision and
supports Council and departmental operational goals.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Continue a cooperative effort with other Oregon cities to audit fees paid by local
franchise holders.
s Review and update financial planning and budget processes to further streamline and
improve them.
♦ Provide financial and policy support to other City departments as needed on special
proj ects.
♦ Review selected City services to identify costs and benefits of privatizing those
services.
Issue Library General Obligation bonds.
♦ Provide financial analysis support (including capital financing options) if the Council
decides to promote the annexation of Bull Mountain.
♦ Provide financial analysis support (including capital financing options) for
implementation of the Washington Square Regional Plan.
♦ Provide ongoing support to the Library in review of Washington County Cooperative
Library Service funding issues.
♦ Review the City's financial software system for possible replacement or upgrade.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Number of franchise audits 0 1 1 1
Number of funds managed 26 26 30 30
Number of budgetary units (divisions) 35 35 33 33
Number of City franchises 9 14 16 15
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Average return on City investment
pool N/A 6.0% 5.5% 4.4%
The City's general obligation bond
rating is Al or higher Al Al Al Al
Number of departments rating
Finance Department services as
good or excellent N/A 3 7 7
Tigard receives the GFOA
Distinguished Budget Presentation
Award Yes Yes Yes Yes
Change in franchise fee collections:
Electric 0.00% 2.86% 42.36% 18.18%
Telephone (2.60%) (0.74%) (7.68%) 23.38%
Natural Gas 16.00% 13.98% 19.68% 2.00%
Solid Waste (1.05%) 6.45% (0.27%) 2.00%
Cable TV (16.15%) 15.05 7.72% (13.44)%
Budget Highlights:
• Overall budget is down 9.66%.
• Materials & Services is down 39.43% due to attorney fees being moved to City
Attorney budget.
• Possible additions per City Council discussion of PGE audit results:
• $20,000 for one utility franchise audit.
• $25,000 for right-of-way study.
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 2.00 3.00 3.00 0.00%
Personal
Services $137,081 $211,029 $209,136 -0.90%
M aterials
& Services 39,830 62,120 37,623 -39.43%
Capital
Outlay 0 0 0 0.00%
Total $176,911 $273,149 $246,759 -9.66%
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Finance
Division: Financial Operations
Budget Pages: 175-179
Department Results Statement:
♦ The Division contributes to the Finance Department's overall desired result of
building and maintaining a strong financial position for the City.
♦ Financial and management reporting being provided to City departments meet both
local budget law and general governmental accounting standards as well as meeting
informational needs of City programs.
♦ Support of City programs and departments in minimizing or reducing the cost of
doing business through effective purchasing and contracting initiatives.
Maximize revenue sources to the City.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Implement GASB 34 requirements by July 1, 2003.
♦ Complete annual audit and issue Comprehensive Annual Financial Report by
November 15, 2002.
♦ Participate in the City's annual budget process with adoption by the Council before
July 1, 2003.
♦ Complete a business process review to improve customer service and identify needed
process improvements.
♦ Review rates and penalties (business tax and other miscellaneous revenues) and make
appropriate recommendations for change to City Management and Council
♦ Complete annual review of solid waste hauler's financial reports and report result to
City Management and Council by May 1, 2003.
♦ Complete implementation of the outsourcing of utility bill receipting.
♦ Complete transition of coordination and oversight of City's contract manual from
Risk Management by December 31, 2002.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Payroll checks processed 7,200 6,928 6,800 6,800
Accounts payable checks N/A 6,924 7,956 7,200
Check requests/invoices processed 19,200 19,080 20,808 20,000
Number of water accounts N/A 15,764 15,872 16,253
Number of utility bills sent 96,000 100,166 102,528 104,628
Number of water meters sold 450 660 350 358
Number of purchase orders processed 1,000 763 1,071 1,092
Number of business tax accounts 2,913 3,184 3,050 3,296
Size of investment pool
(LGIP and 3rd Party)
(millions) $32.0 $35.9 $35.0 $36.0
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Financial Reports accurate and
released on time N/A 100% 100% 100%
Council and departmental requests
for information/analysis responded
to within one week(%) N/A 90% 90% 95%
Ratio of current water bills 60 days
past due to total billed N/A 2.56% 2.00% 1.50%
Payroll processing, distribution, and
reporting is accurate, and prepared,
and released on time N/A 98% 100% 100%
Ratio of nonpayment of Business Tax
to total accounts N/A 4.0% 2.0% 1.5%
Number of departments rating
Financial Operations Division
service as good or excellent N/A 7 7 7
Receive GFOA Award - Consolidated
Annual Financial Report Yes Yes Yes Yes
Budget Highlights:
• Overall budget is up 2.6%.
• Personal Services includes a reclassification of a Senior Accounting Assistant
position to a Buyer position in FY 01-02.
• Office Supplies is down because FY 01-02 budget included one-time furniture
expenditures.
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 10.75 10.80 10.80 0.00%
Personal
Services 566,817 610,031 650,597 6.65%
M aterials
& Services 132,562 199,839 180,294 -9.78%
Capital
Outlay 0 0 0 0.00%
Total 699,379 809,870 830,891 2.60%
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Finance
Division: Office Services
Budget Pages: 180-182
Department Results Statement:
♦ Centralized and efficient customer support is provided to customers.
♦ The City's website provides the public with comprehensive information about the
City and its services.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Continue work with the Web Administrator and Web Committee to improve
information and services provided through the City's website.
♦ Evaluate the services provided by Office Services to determine if City staff needs are
being met with current staffing levels.
s Evaluate the feasibility of consolidating support services for Finance, City
Administration, Engineering, Community Development, and the Library.
♦ Coordinate the annual Finance Department customer service survey.
s Conduct customer service survey related to the room reservation process.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Average number of switchboard
calls per day 476 504 520 535
Average number of work projects
per month N/A 60 77 79
Average number of pieces of mail
sent per month 6,280 5,628 6,245 6,430
Average number of hours spent on
room reservations per month N/A 30 30 30
Average hours per month spent
developing and maintaining the City's
website 15 23 40 25
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Staff rating Office Services
response and accuracy as good
or excellent (%) N/A 100% 90% 100%
Outside users of City rooms
rating customer service as good
or excellent (%) N/A 90% 90% 95%
Users that return to the City's
website for information(%) N/A 30% 40% 30%
Budget Highlights:
• Overall budget is up 6.06%.
• Personal Services is due to salary merit increases and medical/dental insurance
increases.
• Office Supplies includes anticipated postage increase of$.01 in January 2003.
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00%
Personal
Services $159,752 $176,819 $188,972 6.87%
Materials
& Services 86,026 100,433 105,072 4.62%
Capital
Outlay 4,604 0 0 0.00%
Total 1 $250,382 1 $277,252 1 $2941044 6.06%
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Finance
Division: Records
Budget Pages: 183-186
Department Results Statement:
♦ Records are provided to the public as required under Oregon's public records law.
♦ Management of inactive departmental records is provided.
♦ City records are protected through use of current records management practices and
use of technology.
♦ Litigation support is provided through a centralized system.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Meet customer needs for records.
♦ Complete annual records destruction.
♦ Continue to provide staff training on records issues, file storage, and retention.
s Keep microfilming of records current and the archival security film stored with the
State Archivist's office.
♦ Issue Request for Proposal (RFP) to replace outdated microfilm reader printer.
♦ Based on departmental input, issue a RFP to determine records management software
alternatives.
♦ Explore options for storage of departmental inactive records.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Number of incoming records entered
in to the file system per month 323 102 200 225
Average length of time required to
provide records (minutes) 63 46 60 55
Average number of records requests
per month 59 64 75 80
Hours per month spent preparing
records for microfilming and
checking film 50 51 60 60
Cubic feet of records destroyed in
annual destruction 150 300 150 300
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Requests responded to within
one hour(%) N/A 95% 75% 95%
Microfilmed records to archives
for storage (%) N/A 75% 100% 100%
Records meeting minimum retention
requirements destroyed(%) N/A 98% 70% 80%
In-house users rating customer
service as good or excellent(%) N/A 100% 95% 100%
Budget Highlights:
• Overall budget is up 12.91%.
• Capital Outlay includes $15,000 for the replacement of the microfilm reader/printer,
which is fifteen years old. The manufacturer is no longer supporting the existing
reader and indicated that replacement parts are no longer available. The Records
division uses the reader/printer on a daily basis as many City records have been
archived on microfilm/fiche.
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00%
Personal
Services $113,898 $144,035 $151,150 4.94%
M aterials
& Services 10,951 20,586 19,717 -4.22%
Capital
Outlay 0 0 15,000 100.00%
Total $124,849 $164,621 $185,867 12.9 1%
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Finance
Division: Municipal Court
Budget Pages: 187-189
Department Results Statement:
♦ Court services are provided locally.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Evaluate the success of the youth court.
♦ Expand Municipal Court section of the web site to educate customers on the City's
court system.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Number of traffic citations processed 6,086 5,958 5,500 6,000
Number of cases in which license was
suspended for failure to pay fine 1,200 909 1,725 960
Number of trials per year docketed 695 606 1,035 575
Average fine amount collected $60 $53 $50 $50
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Cases disposed of within 90
days of issuance of citation (%) N/A 93% 85% 90%
Assessed fines collected within
30 days of imposition (%) N/A 71% 75% 75%
Cases suspended for failure to
pay (%) N/A 15% 14% 17%
Budget Highlights:
• Overall budget is down 21.27%.
• There is a reduction of 1.0 FTE, which was added to assist with the anticipated
increase in citations due to the photo radar program. Photo radar has been postponed
for now and therefore the position is no longer necessary.
• Reductions in Personal Services and Materials & Services is due to the postponement
of the photo radar program. All costs associated with the program have been
removed from the budget request.
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 4.00 4.00 3.00 -25.00%
Personal
Services $143,419 $187,506 $163,605 -12.75%
M aterials
& Services 52,648 79,321 46,455 -41.43%
Capital
Outlay 0 0 0 0.00%
Total $196,067 $266,827 $210,060 -21.27%
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Police
Budget Pages: 62-74
Includes the following divisions: Administration, Operations, and Support Services
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 76.33 75.50 75.00 -0.66%
Personal
Services $4,931,459 $5,411,738 $5,852,740 8.15%
M aterials
& Services 985,438 1,304,606 1,172,216 -10.15%
Capital
Outlay 245,036 1 262,800 113,000 -57.00%
Total $6,161,933 1 $6,979,144 $7,137,956 2.28%
1
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Police
Division: Administration
Budget Pages: 63-65
Department Results Statement:
♦ The Police Administration Division prevents and suppresses crime by providing crime
prevention materials and programs to multi-family dwellings and businesses.
♦ The Police Administration Division decreases false alarms through alarm ordinance
administration.
♦ The Police Administration Division increases police visibility with operational And
equipment changes.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Complete accreditation process for the Department.
♦ Increase Neighborhood Watch participation.
s Expand crime prevention programming into cable programming.
♦ Develop a strategic plan for the future of the Department.
♦ Increase police visibility in the community.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Number of reported accidents 980 1,120 1,085 1,107
Number of injury accidents 193 247 200 214
Traffic citations issued 6,086 5,500 6,700 7,500
Issued alarm permits N/A 2,106 2,631 2,894
Number of false alarms 1,500 1,424 1,893 1,500
Number of neighborhood N/A 75 84 90
watch groups
Community policing agreements N/A 21 58 70
2
Number of Part I and II reported
crimes 5,188 5,400 5,593 5,800
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Increase in neighborhood watch
locations (%) 12% 7%
Increase in community policing
agreements (%) 50% 21%
Increase in crime prevention
programming (%) 5%
Decrease in reported accidents (%) N/A 14% 3% (2%)
Increase in alarm permits (%) 25% 10%
Decrease in false alarms (%) N/A 5% 33% 21%
Budget Highlights:
• Total budget down 12.25%
• Materials and services down 56.5% -- city attorney costs were reduced and moved to the City
Attorney budget unit and grant match was removed pending receipt of grant(mid-year
budget amendment will be required).
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00%
Personal
Services $241,000 $248,185 $256,626 3.40%
M aterials
& Services 47,010 87,681 38,100 -56.55%
Capital
Outlay 6,933 0 0 0.00%
Total $294,943 $335,866 $294,726 -12.25%
3
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Police
Division: Operations
Budget Pages: 66-70
Department Results Statement:
♦ The Operations Division of the Police Department solves community problems and forms
community partnerships.
♦ The Operations Division provides rapid response to serious calls for service, (Priority I calls).
♦ The Operations Division prevents, deters, and suppresses crime.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Maintain responses to emergency calls of less than 4 minutes and establish patrol case
clearance statistics.
s Continue implementing Problem Solving/Community Policing.
♦ Target crime and traffic specific problems in the community and deploy resources to solve
the targeted problems, taking into consideration all community resources.
♦ Target and suppress gang activity/crime through enforcement, education, and community
involvement.
♦ Continue making requests from crime/utility watch groups a high priority.
♦ Refer juvenile offenders to the Tigard Peer Court.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Number of community issues N/A 29 58 61
Number of community policing
projects N/A 12 24 30
Number of partnership agreements N/A 21 42 44
Number of calls for service 34,212 38,212 39,000 40,950
Response time to priority I calls
(minutes) 3.60 3.91 <4.00 <4.00
4
Number of priority I calls N/A 2,814 2,900 3,045
Number of officers per 1,000
population 1.51 1.51 1.52 1.52
Reported part I and II crimes 5,188 5,400 5,593 5,800
Number of directed patrols N/A 21 42 46
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Increase in reported community
issues mediated(%) N/A 5% 5% 5%
Decrease in repeat calls to
community policing project(%) N/A 5% 5% 5%
Increase of partnership agreements(%) N/A 5% 100% 5%
Response time to priority I calls
(minutes) 3.60 3.91 <4.00 <4.00
Change in part I and II reported
crime 3.99% 4.01% 3.60% 3.70%
Increase in number of directed patrols N/A N/A 100% 10%
Budget Highlights:
• Total budget is down 1.7%
• Staffing is down .5 FTE due to removal of half-time position added in FY 2001-02 for photo
radar. This program has been postponed indefinitely.
• Personal Services increase of 6.4% is related to negotiated salary and benefits adjustments.
• Materials and Services is down 29.7% due to the removal of the photo radar vendor payment
and leased equipment and the removal of expenses associated with the K-9 program, which
has been postponed.
• Capital outlay is down 55.1%. The FY 2001-02 budget included funds for thermal imaging
equipment that does not need to be reappropriated and for fully trained dogs for the K-9
program, which has been delayed.
5
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 46.50 47.50 47.00 -1.05%
Personal
Services $3,124,824 $3,482,568 $3,706,687 6.44%
M aterials
& Services 330,919 534,188 375,390 -29.73%
Capital
Outlay 174,099 251,800 113,000 -55.12%
Total $3,629,842 $4,268,556 $4,195,077 -1.72%
6
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Police
Division: Support Services
Budget Pages: 71-74
Department Results Statement:
♦ Detectives successfully investigate serious A and B felony crimes.
♦ Records Management enhances prosecution, provides timely information, and supports
public records requests.
♦ Department effectiveness and efficiency is improved through automation of work tasks and
timely reporting of Department activities.
♦ Department training is coordinated, timely, and relevant.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
Detective Unit:
Continue enforcement and investigation emphasis on gang and drug related criminal activity.
♦ Focus on person crimes: homicide, assault, rape, robbery, and child abuse.
♦ Prioritize investigations in crimes directed towards the elderly.
♦ Maintain high levels of clearance rates of crimes and recovered property.
Records Unit:
♦ Maintain the Portland Police Data System entry timeliness.
♦ Insure State records retention schedule rules are complied with.
♦ Provide Law Enforcement Data System update training for Records personnel.
♦ Maintain accountability of lost, abandoned, and seized property.
♦ Insure integrity of chain of custody for all evidence required for criminal proceedings.
♦ Properly dispose of or destroy property/evidence when no longer needed or as required by
state statute.
7
Training:
♦ Program and coordinate the in-service mandatory training program.
♦ Draft bi-weekly briefing Training Bulletins.
♦ Conduct career development training to prepare Department personnel for the future.
♦ Design specialized training for specific work groups.
♦ Conduct training needs assessment for the Department to reduce liability and improve officer
safety.
♦ Assist with completion and maintenance of the accreditation process.
♦ Manage Department grants, including research, application, monitoring, and reporting.
♦ Manage the Department's directive system.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Number of cases assigned for follow-up 425 500 440 445
Number of cases cleared 255 238 264 300
Number of reports processed N/A 9,000 9,200 9,300
Number of training requests processed N/A 100 105 120
Number of classes sponsored N/A 1 3 3
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Assigned cases cleared (%) N/A >60% >60% 85%
Department staff rating training support
as good or excellent(%) N/A >80% >85% >85%
Budget Highlights:
• Total budget up 11.5%
• Budget includes no new positions. Personal Services increase of 12.4% is related to
negotiated salary and benefits adjustments.
8
• Materials and Services is up 11.1%,primarily due to increased cost of Washington County
Consolidated Communications Agency(WCCCA), pass through of increased 911 funding to
WCCCA, and increased cost of Portland Police Data Services (PPDS).
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 26.83 25.00 25.00 0.00%
Personal
Services $1,565,635 $1,680,985 $1,889,427 12.40%
Materials
& Services 607,509 682,737 758,726 11.13%
Capital
Outlay 64,004 11,000 0 -100.00%
Total $2,237,148 $2,374,722 $2,648,153 11.51%
9
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Community Development
Budget Pages: 120-135
Includes the following divisions: CD Administration, Building Inspection, Current
Planning and Long Range Planning
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 28.50 30.50 30.50 0.00%
Personal
Services $1,659,469 $1,962,619 $2,054,549 4.68%
M aterials
& Services 374,390 425,597 253,397 -40.46%
Capital
Outlay 0 0 1 0 0.00%
Total $2,033,859 $2,388,216 1 $2,307,946 -3.36%
1
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Community Development
Division: CD Administration
Budget Pages: 123-125
Department Results Statement:
♦ Leadership and management are provided for the growth and development of Tigard
consistent with community goals.
♦ Accurate and timely information and assistance is provided regarding development,
development regulations, permit processing, and issuance.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Maintain liaison to the City Council, Tigard Central Business District Association,
and other civic organizations.
♦ Meet goals established by the City Council that are the responsibility of the
Community Development Department.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Provide resources for community
development to public and civic
organization, such as Tigard Area
Chamber of Commerce, Tigard
Central Business District Assoc-
iation, etc (Y/1) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Present special studies for City
Council consideration(Y/N) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Tigard's building inspection program
meets all state statutes and rules Yes Yes Yes Yes
Tigard's current planning program
complies with all state and regional
programs, statutes, and rules
(% of decisions within 120 days) 100% 100% 100% 100%
2
Tigard's long range planning program
complies with all state and regional
goals and rules (Y/N) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Tigard complies with Metro and
Department of Land Conservation
and Development regulations (Y/N) Yes Yes Yes Yes
The Community Development Depart-
ment meets Council's goals (Y/N) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Budget Highlights:
• Overall budget is down 9.48% from FY 2001-02.
• Personal Services is down due to elimination of temporary part-time assistance and
vacation buy-out.
• Decrease in Materials & Services is due to the moving of attorney fees to City
Attorney budget.
• No change in FTE.
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00%
Personal
Services $215,613 $236,507 $233,439 -1.30%
Materials
& Services 77,059 59,655 34,659 -41.90%
Capital
Outlay 0 0 0 0.00%
Total $292,672 1 $296,162 1 $268,098 -9.48%
3
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Community Development
Division: Building Inspection
Budget Pages: 126-129
Department Results Statement:
♦ Buildings are constructed and built to the State of Oregon specialty codes and are safe
for all occupants and users.
♦ Existing housing is safe, habitable, and in good repair.
♦ The Building Inspection Division is supported by a dedicated fund,which is
generated by permit revenues.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Monitor budget on an ongoing basis to ensure expenditures are within budgetary
constraints in order to accumulate additional reserve funding.
♦ Work with homeowners, landlords, and property managers in resolving housing
deficiencies as related to the Housing Code Program.
♦ Provide building,plumbing, mechanical, and electrical plan review services for new
construction within service level standards.
♦ Provide building, plumbing,mechanical, and electrical inspection services for new
construction within service level standards.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Single family permits (Tigard) 190 170 220 207
Single family permits
(Urban services area) 210 160 200 177
Multi-family units (Tigard) 337 0 27 30
Multi-family units
(Urban services area) N/A N/A 0 0
Commercial (Tigard) N/A 600 450 500
4
Commercial (Urban services area) N/A N/A 0 0
Number of inspections (Tigard) 18,000 19,672 14,134 13,000
Number of inspections
(Urban services area) 8,000 10,973 7,155 6,370
Total number of permits (Tigard)
(All types) 3,800 4,117 3,126 2,760
Total number of permits
(Urban services area) 1,650 1,307 4,296 3,780
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Percent of inspections
requiring reinspections due to
code deficiencies N/A N/A 31% 28%
Number of housing complaints
inspected N/A N/A 226 240
Number of housing complaint
investigations that obtain compliance
(verifiable violations) N/A N/A 205 210
Requested building inspections
performed the following business
day of receipt of request(%) N/A N/A 99% 99%
Plan review turnaround time
(Single family) (weeks) N/A N/A 2 2
Plan review turnaround time
(Commercial tenant improvement)
(weeks) N/A N/A 3 3
Plan review turnaround time
(Commercial - new buildings)
(weeks) N/A N/A 4-6 4-6
5
Budget Highlights:
• Overall budget is down 7.70% from FY 2001-02.
• Decrease of 58.74% in Materials & Services is primarily due to the following:
➢ Professional & Contract Services decrease is due to attorney fees being moved to
City Attorney budget and moving of some contractual temporary help to Personal
Services.
➢ Miscellaneous Expense was decreased due to the moving of$10,000 for
"Emergency Housing"to Social Services.
➢ FY 2001-02 budget included the final payment on the building modular in Rents
& Leases.
➢ Minimizing use of outside inspection service.
➢ More accurate reflection of actual use of credit cards by customers.
• No change in FTE.
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 12.50 13.50 13.50 0.00%
Personal
Services $786,148 $890,979 $916,606 2.88%
M aterials
& Services 122,369 184,665 76,186 -58.74%
Capital
Outlay 0 1 0 0 0.00%
Total $908,517 1 $1,075,644 $992,792 -7.70%
6
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Community Development
Division: Current Planning
Budget Pages: 130-132
Department Results Statement:
♦ All development will meet Comprehensive Plan and Development Code standards.
♦ All development will be compatible with environmental conditions including steep
slopes, wetlands, hazards, and flood plains.
♦ All land use development will be served with water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer,
streets, and public facilities meeting City standards and requirements.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Train new staff so they will effectively process development plans and code
amendments.
♦ Implement Washington Square Regional Center development code changes.
♦ Prepare at least three code amendments from the backlog list. The list includes
hillside development, water quality standards,planned developments, home
occupations, and bed and breakfast facilities.
♦ Continue to monitor effectiveness of 1998 Development Code.
♦ Process all development applications within service standards.
♦ Implement code revisions relating to the Transportation System Plan.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Number of development applications N/A 334 304 330
Number of land use decisions made by:
Director 310 325 282 300
Planning Commission/
Hearings Officer 20 20 15 20
City Council 12 10 8 8
7
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Land use decisions made within 120
days (%) N/A 100% 100% 100%
Land use decisions made within
service standards (%) N/A 85% 94% 97%
Developments that meet ordinance
standards and process (%) N/A 10% 100% 100%
Budget Highlights:
• Overall budget has increased 3.98% from FY 2001-02.
• Decrease of 29.50% in Materials & Services is due primarily to one-time software
upgrades occurring in FY 2001-02 and reduction of some contractual services.
• No change in FTE.
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 9.00 9.00 9.00 0.00%
Personal
Services $405,325 $497,722 $536,619 7.82%
M aterials
& Services 30,541 57,049 40,220 -29.50%
Capital
Outlay 0 0 0 0.00%
Total $435,866 $554,771 $576,839 3.98%
8
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Community Development
Division: Long Range Planning
Budget Pages: 133-135
Department Results Statement:
Accommodate growth while protecting the character and livability of the community
through long range planning and through implementation of the City's Vision.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Continue implementation of the Washington Square Regional Center development
program, focusing on funding strategy and greenbelt plan strategy.
♦ Develop an open space planning program.
♦ Work on urban renewal feasibility study for Washington Square Regional Center
area.
s Continue participating in Metro Goal 5 program development for significant natural
resources.
♦ Continue working with Tri-Met on Action Plan to improve transit services.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Develop infrastructure funding
program, including urban renewal
feasibility study(%complete) N/A N/A 10% 100%
Develop Affordable Housing Plan
(Y/N) N/A N/A N/A Yes
Develop Bull Mountain Master Plan
(Y/N) N/A N/A N/A Yes
Develop Tigard Transit Plan (Y/N) N/A N/A N/A Yes
Develop and update dynamic web
map for Tigard themes (Y/N) N/A N/A N/A Yes
Hire consultant for Washington
Square Implementation/Public
Involvement Plan (Y/N) N/A N/A Yes N/A
9
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Council adoption of Washington
Square Regional Center
Implementation program(Y/1) N/A N/A N/A Yes
Council adoption of Affordable plan
(Y/N) N/A N/A N/A Yes
Council adoption of Bull Mountain
Master Plan(Y/N) N/A N/A N/A Yes
Council acceptance of Washington
Square Implementation Plan N/A N/A Yes N/A
Budget Highlights:
• Overall budget has increased 1.86% from FY 2001-02.
• Decrease of 17.63% in Materials & Services primarily due to one-time consulting
fees for Washington Square Regional Plan budgeted in FY 2001-02 that will not
occur in FY 2002-03.
• No change in FTE.
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 4.00 5.00 5.00 0.00%
Personal
Services $252,383 $337,411 $367,885 9.03%
M aterials
& Services 144,421 124,228 102,332 -17.63%
Capital
Outlay 0 0 0 0.00%
Total $396,804 $461,639 $470,217 I 1.86%
10
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Engineering
Budget Pages: 136-145
Includes the following divisions: Engineering and Street Lights & Signals
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 15.50 16.00 16.00 0.00%
Personal
Services $939,032 $1,095,736 $1,147,456 4.72%
M aterials
& Services 452,616 624,323 584,688 -6.35%
Capital
Outlay 0 1 4,800 0 -100.00%
Total $1,391,648 1 $1,724,859 $1,732,144 0.42%
1
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Engineering
Division: Engineering
Budget Pages: 137-142
Department Results Statement:
♦ The Engineering Department supports the City's goals and objectives.
♦ Private developments are designed and constructed in accordance with the City's
standards and requirements:
1. Public improvements by developers are constructed to meet City design standards and
development code provisions.
2. Hillside development is constructed in accordance with City and state regulations.
3. As-built information system is space-efficient and provides up-to-date, accurate
information for the City's customers.
4. Public improvements perform in accordance with design life.
♦ The City's transportation system is safe and efficient for all modes of travel:
1. The City's street infrastructure is properly maintained and upgraded as needed to meet
future traffic demands.
2. Capital improvement projects are designed and constructed properly to enhance traffic
flow and traffic safety while minimizing maintenance costs.
3. The City's neighborhood streets are safe for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists, and
carry traffic volumes appropriate for residential neighborhoods.
♦ The Engineering Department enhances environmental quality in the City by providing
adequate storm drain and sanitary sewer services to citizens of Tigard.
♦ The Engineering Department keeps abreast of and addresses regional and national
issues that may affect the City.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Complete Comprehensive Public Facility Plans.
♦ Continue Private Development Review improvements.
2
♦ Develop and implement the annual Capital Improvement Program.
♦ Explore and develop feasible funding strategies for implementation of high priority
transportation projects.
♦ Evaluate and implement alternative funding sources for street maintenance.
♦ Continue implementation of the Citywide Sewer Extension Program.
♦ Incorporate citizen involvement processes in the Engineering Department programs.
♦ Provide assistance to other City departments as needed in support of Council goals
and City programs.
♦ Upgrade equipment and software needed in support of Engineering Department
activities and program changes.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Preparation of Comprehensive Public
Facility Plans
Percent of plans completed N/A N/A N/A 100%
Private Development Review Activities:
Number of subdivisions requiring
additional geotechnical review by CityN/A 3 1 3
Number of Compliance Agreement
Permit projects issued N/A 10 18 11
Capital Improvement Program
Implementation Streets
Number of CIP street-related
projects N/A 25 19 20
PMMP:
Area of pavement overlay applied
(sq. yd) N/A 16,000 8,500 15,000
Area of slurry seal applied(sq. yd.) N/A 26,000 10,500 5,000
Length of striping applied (ft.) N/A 6,200 21,000 15,000
Traffic Calming:
Number of traffic calming devices
installed yearly N/A 8 12 8
3
Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drainage Services:
Sanitary Sewer
Major maintenance: number of identified
repairs completed N/A 3 2 2
Neighborhood extensions: number of
reimbursement districts initiated N/A 5 3 3
Number of sewer service laterals
provided N/A 60 39 65
Lineal feet of sewer mainline
installed N/A N/A 4,000 4,000
Storm Drainage:
Major maintenance: number of
identified repairs completed N/A 3 2 2
Five-year SLIP lining program(L.F.) N/A N/A 1,000 1,000
Projects in support of City programs N/A N/A 4 4
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Private Development Review Activities:
Projects that require major repairs
of public improvements during the
1-year maintenance period (%) N/A 0% 3% 3%
Subdivisions that exhibit grading
problems after City acceptance of
project(%) N/A 1% 3% 3%
Capital Improvement Program Implementation
Streets:
CIP street projects designed (%) N/A 80% 90% 80%
CIP street projects constructed (%) N/A 80% 75% 80%
Traffic Calming:
Reduction of 85th percentile speeds (%)N/A 90% 90% 90%
Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drain Services
Sanitary Sewer:
Major maintenance:
Percent of repairs completed N/A N/A 65% 100%
Maintenance problem eliminated Yes Yes Yes Yes
Citywide Sewer Extension Program:
Percent of scheduled reimbursement
districts completed N/A N/A 90% 90%
4
Lineal footage of sewer installed as
a percentage of the total master plan
layout N/A N/A 10% 25%
New sewer connections as a percentage
of total laterals in preceding years N/A N/A 5% 20%
Storm Drainage:
Major maintenace: percent of repairs
completed N/A 75% 75% 85%
Maintenance problems eliminated N/A Yes Yes Yes
Percentage of storm drainage pipe
upgraded N/A N/A 100% 100%
Projects in supporting City programs
are completed in a timely manner N/A N/A Yes Yes
Budget Highlights:
• Overall budget has increased 3.06% from FY 2001-02.
• Decrease of 8.07% in Materials & Services is due primarily to more accurate
reflection of actual use of credit cards by customers.
• Professional & Contract Services decrease due to the moving of attorney fees to City
Attorney budget.
• No change in FTE.
• One position is being held vacant.
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 15.50 16.00 16.00 0.00%
Personal
Services $939,032 $1,095,736 $1,147,456 4.72%
M aterials
& Services 109,515 119,323 109,688 -8.07%
Capital
Outlay 0 4,800 0 -100.00%
Total $1,048,547 $1,219,859 $1,257,144 3.06%
5
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Engineering
Division: Street Lights & Signals
Budget Pages: 143-145
Department Results Statement:
♦ Collector Streets are adequately lit for vehicular and pedestrian safety.
♦ Major intersections are upgraded with traffic signal systems for safe and efficient
movement of all modes of transportation.
♦ Neighborhood streets are provided adequate lighting in accordance with City policies.
2002-03 Goals and Objectives:
♦ Review, approve, and accept for maintenance new traffic signal systems installed at
98th Avenue and Durham Road; and 121St Avenue and Gaarde Street.
♦ Complete Comprehensive Public Facility Plan for streetlights.
♦ Install essential streetlights as determined by the Public Facility Plan.
♦ Continuation of energy and maintenance costs for installed systems.
♦ Reduction of energy costs by turning off existing streetlights that can be shut off
without adversely impacting safety.
Workload Measurements:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
New signal systems added 1 2 4 2
New street lights added 10 60 60 30
Public Facility Plan for streetlights
completed N/A N/A 50% 100%
Number of essential streetlights
installed N/A N/A N/A 10
6
Effectiveness Measures:
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Level of service improvement
in new signalized intersections N/A Yes Yes Yes
Mileage of collector streets with
streetlights (%) N/A N/A 20% 25%
Public Facility Plan for streetlights
adopted by City Council N/A N/A N/A Yes
Visibility problems resolved along
street network (as a percentage of
problem areas identified in the
Public Facility Plan) N/A N/A N/A 20%
Budget Highlights:
• Overall budget is down 5.94% from FY 2001-02. This is primarily due to the
completion of the replacement of deteriorating poles in the Summerfield area and
adjusting utilities budget to reflect current trends in usage.
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%
Personal
Services $0 $0 $0 0.00%
M aterials
& Services 343,101 505,000 475,000 -5.94%
Capital
Outlay 1 0 0 0 0.00%
Total $343,101 1 $505,000 1 $475,000 1 -5.94%
7
ITY 2002-03 Budget Review
Department: Capital Improvement Program
Budget Pages: 194 - 203
Budget Summary
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
Facilities System $292,924 $1,160,000 $4,076,250 251.40%
Parks System 970,236 1,012,810 1,825,100 80.20%
Sanitary Sewer
System 543,866 2,230,000 2,300,000 3.14%
Storm Drainage
System 297,761 745,500 232,000 -68.88%
Street System 2,615,773 3,448,000 6,575,281 90.70%
Water System 1 725,035 2,056,000 2,443,000 18.82%
Total $5,445,595 $10,652,310 $10,932,381 2.63%
Budget Highlights:
• Facilities System CIP includes $3.75 million for new library construction.
• Parks System CIP include $650,000 for Cook Park expansion, $200,000 for
Skateboard Park(acquisition/design), and$295,000 for Bonita Park development.
• Sanitary Sewer System CIP includes $2 million for neighborhood and commercial
sewer extension programs.
• Storm Drainage System CIP continues major maintenance program, pipe
rehabilitation, and wetland monitoring.
• Street System CIP includes $2.2 million for Gaarde Street Phase 2, $2 million for
Wall Street LID, and $676,000 for Greenburg Road.
• Water System CIP includes $675,000 for Menlor Pump Station, $350,000 to secure
reservoir, and $370,00 for Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Phase 2.
1
FY 2002-03 Budget Review
Debt Service: Bancroft and General Obligation Bonds
Budget Pages: 204 - 208
General Obligation
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A
Personal
Services $0 $0 $0 N/A
Debt
Service 257,000 246,988 1,324,138 436.11%
Capital
Outlay 0 0 0 N/A
Total $257,000 $246,988 $1,324,138 436.11%
Bancroft Bond
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A
Personal
Services $0 $0 $0 N/A
Debt
Service 2,363,834 4,515,222 4,464,973 -1.11%
Capital
Outlay 0 0 0 N/A
Total $2,363,834 $4,515,222 $4,464,973 -1.11%
Parks CIP
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 % Change from
Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted
FTE 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A
Personal
Services $0 $0 $0 N/A
Debt
Service 0 0 277,861 #DIV/0!
Capital
Outlay 0 0 0 N/A
Total $0 $0 $277,861 #DIV/0!
1
Budget Highlights;
General Obligation Bonds
• Includes the final payment of the 1993 Aeries A Advance refunding Bonds ($256,638)
• Includes $1,067,500 estimated debt service for the Library General Obligation Bonds. If
voters do not approve this bond on May 21,this amount should be removed from the budget.
Bancroft Bond
• Includes $387,388 to pay debt service on existing Bancroft Improvement Bonds. This
amount needs to be adjusted upwards to allow the City to use cash on hand to call additional
bond principal.
• Includes$1,715,000 to pay off interim financing for the 69`h Ave. LID. These notes will be
replaced with long-term financing now that the project is completed.
• Includes $2,100,000 to pay off interim financing for the Martin portion of the Dartmouth LID.
This pay-off is contingent upon settlement of the Martin lawsuit.
Parks CIP
• This item needs to be added to the FY 2002-03 budget. This item pays the first installment
due on the loan form the Oregon Economic and Community Development Department
(OECDD)for the Cook Park improvements.
2
CITY OF TIGARD
Engineering Department
Shaping A Better Community
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard,OR 97223
Phone(503)6394171
Fax(503)624-0752
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Agustin P.Duenas,P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: May 9, 2002
SUBJECT: FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
This document presents the proposed FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for review and
recommendation to the City Council.
Background
The Capital Improvement Program includes improvements to the streets, storm drainage, sanitary
sewer, water, parks, and city facilities systems. The Engineering Department manages the street, storm
drainage, and sanitary sewer CIP's. The Public Works Department manages the Water System CIP, the
Parks CIP is managed jointly by the Public Works, Community Development and Engineering
Departments, and the City Facilities System is jointly managed by the Engineering and Public Works
Departments.
The Capital Improvement Program is reviewed and approved each year by the City Council. The CIP
formulation is now integrated into the budget formulation process and is approved as part of the City's
overall budget together with the annual operating budget. The program submitted to the City's Budget
Committee, the Planning Commission and City Council is a 5-year program with the first year's
program described in detail. While the program lists projects for subsequent fiscal years, the projects
shown are tentative and are subject to change during the formulation process for each specific budget
year. The CIP, through the adoption process, establishes the budget for the upcoming fiscal year and
serves as a planning document to guide the infrastructure improvements over the following 4 years.
During each budget year's update, the revenue estimates are adjusted, the project cost estimates are
� k
reviewed, and the program and project priorities are re-evaluated based on changes in City plans,
citizen input, and additional data which may become available.
Process
The Capital Improvement Program update process begins with citizen involvement through the Citizen
Involvement Teams. To ensure coordination with the annual operating budget process, the CIP
formulation needs to begin late each calendar year for the following fiscal year, which begins July 1 sc
of the next calendar year. This is a change from the former process which typically began early in the
calendar year for the fiscal year beginning July of that same calendar year. Hence, the CIP overview
was presented during the November 2001 CIT meeting. The CIT meeting in December provided the
CIT members with the opportunity to provide input into the process and to nominate projects for
evaluation and possible inclusion into the program. The final meeting in January 2002 completed the
CIT process for the FY 2002-03 CIP. After that, the program submittals would be to the City's Budget
Committee, the Planning Commission and City Council for adoption and implementation beginning
July 1,2002. This is the process that would be followed henceforth in the CIP formulation.
The Planning Commission review typically provides another opportunity for public comment on the
proposed plan. After review by the Planning Commission, the plan with subsequent modifications, if
any, is submitted, with Commission recommendation, to the City Council for review and approval.
Council may make additional modifications to the plan during its review and approval process. The
approved plan would be the approved Capital Improvement Program for the next fiscal year.
The following summarizes the program update for the 2002-03 budget year. It is important to note that
each funding source has restrictions on the types of projects that can be constructed. Projects cannot be
moved from one funding source to another. The specific lists of projects and funding requirements are
contained in the appendices associated with each of the program areas.
2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
STREET SYSTEM PROGRAM
The Street System Program contains projects to construct, maintain, and improve Tigard's street
system. Projects are accounted for in the State Gas Tax Fund, the Traffic Impact Fee Fund, the Urban
Services Fund, the Underground Utility Fund, the Dartmouth LID Fund and the Wall Street LID CIP
Fund.
State Gas Tax Fund
State gas tax revenue can be used for upgrading the collector and local streets within Tigard, without
restriction. This revenue is limited, however, and is not sufficient to fund all the street improvement
needs of the City. There was a substantial decrease in projected funding available for FY 2001-02 in
comparison to previous fiscal years. The total amount available for the CIP was $207,000, which
included traffic calming, reconstruction, preventative and corrective maintenance, and installation of
traffic control devices. The amount available for FY 2002-03 is at a higher level. However, as
expenses increase and operational costs rise, the amount available for projects will continue to
decrease in the coming years. The state gas tax fund will soon cease to be a viable source of funding
for street-related maintenance projects.
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 2 of 16
d
Traffic Impact Fee Fund
Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) funding can be used only for highway and transit capital improvements that
provide additional capacity to major transportation systems. This funding is limited to major collector
and arterial streets, and 50%must be spent on arterial streets. The transportation planning effort for the
City was recently completed with the adoption of the Tigard Transportation System Plan. There will
not be sufficient funding in the TIF Fund, however, to complete all the projects that are envisioned
over the next 5 to 10 years.
Dartmouth LID Fund
The Dartmouth LID Fund was established to account for the construction of a local improvement
district (LID) on Dartmouth Street. The source of funding is assessments against benefiting properties
within the LID.
Wall Street LID%CIP Fund
The design and construction of Wall Street from Hall Boulevard to Hunziker Street is proposed for
funding through formation of a local improvement district (LID) supplemented by Traffic Impact Fee
funding for engineering design and construction management. The entire project is anticipated to span
several fiscal years. The Preliminary Evaluation Report for the proposed LID has been presented to
City Council. Council has authorized the preparation of the Preliminary Engineer's Report, as the next
step in the process to determine if the LID should be formed.
Urban Services Fund
The Urban Services Fund was established to track revenues and expenses associated with the provision
of services in the areas outside the City limits but within Tigard's urban services area. Tigard provides
current planning, development review, and other services in this area under contract with Washington
County. The City collects building and planning-related fees to pay for these services. In addition, the
County pays the City to provide major road maintenance.
Underground Utility Fund
This fund receives payments from developers in lieu of installing utilities underground. Funds are then
used to place utilities underground typically in conjunction with major roadway projects.
The following are brief descriptions of the street projects proposed for FY 2002-03.
Project Funding Source Amount
Embedded Crosswalk Lights State Gas Tax $25,000
Embedded crosswalk lights were installed at the intersection of 121St Avenue and Springwood Drive in
FY 2001-02. This year's program includes installation of crosswalk lights at the Milton Court/Bonita
Road intersection. This installation is to be performed in conjunction with the development of Bonita
Park west of and immediately adjacent to Milton Court. The crosswalk lights should enhance safe
crossing of Bonita Road at that intersection for those that wish to use the new park.
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 3 of 16
l 4
Project Funding Source Amount
Pavement Major Maintenance Program State Gas Tax $135,000
(PMMP)
This is a program of corrective and preventative maintenance on all paved streets in Tigard. It
addresses those streets that can still benefit from corrective or preventative action. Because of
limited funding, only a few streets are included in the FY 2002-03 program. Streets proposed to
receive overlays include Johnson Street (between Grant Avenue and Highway 99W), North Dakota
Street (between 121St Avenue and 115th Avenue),North Dakota Street (between existing bridge and
Tiedeman Avenue), School Street (from Grant Avenue to end), and Rose Vista Drive (between 121st
Avenue and Gaarde Street). Other streets may be added to this list and the amount set aside for the
PMMP would be increased with a corresponding reduction in the amounts set aside for other
projects funded by the Gas Tax Fund.
Traffic Calming Program State Gas Tax $10,000
This program provides funding for traffic calming measures Citywide. In the last few years, much of
the funding was used to place speed humps on streets that clearly demonstrated the need for
installation of these traffic-calming devices. A portion of this fund is used on a 50-50 cost sharing
basis with residents for placement of speed humps on streets that do not make the implementation
list. The program for FY 2002-03 includes speed humps on Park Street (between 110th Avenue and
Watkins Avenue), 100th Avenue (between Murdock & Inez Street), 1300' Avenue (south of
Hawksbeard Street), and re-installation of speed humps on North Dakota Street (between 121"
Avenue and 115th Avenue) after pavement overlay is completed on that street. Other streets may be
added depending upon neighborhood interest and the street ranking in the speed hump criteria rating
system.
72"d Avenue Railroad Approaches (south of State Gas Tax $30,000
Kable Lane)
The City has been partnering with Portland Western Railroad, Inc. to repair deteriorated railroad
crossings Citywide. The first joint project was the repair of the railroad crossing at Main Street just
north of the Tigard Street intersection. This is another joint project between the City and Portland
Western Railroad to repair the badly deteriorated crossing at 72nd Avenue. This project will remove
and replace the existing rails, the existing aggregate base and asphaltic concrete (AC)pavement at the
railroad crossing. The City will pay for the construction of the roadway approaches. Portland-
Western will pay for the improvements to the actual crossing and manage the project.
North Dakota Street Bridge State Gas Tax $65,000
The North Dakota Street bridge is too narrow to safely pass pedestrian and vehicular traffic
simultaneously. This project will construct a pedestrian bridge on the south side of the existing
bridge. The new bridge will be pre-fabricated timber with a width of 8 feet and an approximate length
of 60 feet.
Mapleleaf Street State Gas Tax $65,000
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 4 of 16
Project Funding Source Amount
This project will widen the existing pavement on the north side of Mapleleaf Street (east of 72"d
Avenue) to the standard width of a typical local street and extend the existing curb and sidewalk to
72"d Avenue.
Walnut Terrace(65'h Avenue to 69`h Avenue) State Gas Tax $60,000
This project will pave the existing gravel road and install curbs and gutters on the street to provide
efficient drainage flow for the area. Design and construction of this project will include storm
drainage improvements to be funded under the Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program.
North Dakota Street(Greenberg Road to State Gas Tax $120,000
95`h Avenue)
North Dakota Street between Greenburg Road and 95th Avenue is in need of reconstruction. The
pavement surface is badly damaged and cannot be corrected through pavement overlay. This project
will reconstruct the existing aggregate base and AC pavement, install curb and gutter for proper
drainage, and construct sidewalk on both sides of the street. The implementation of this project may
be spread over two fiscal years with the priority being given to the PMMP requirements during the
coming fiscal year.
Gaarde Street Improvements Phase 2 Traffic Impact Fee $1,600,000
The improvement of Gaarde Street between Walnut Street and Highway 99W is addressed in two
phases. The first phase of the project between Walnut Street and the Quail Hollow subdivision is
identified as Gaarde Street Improvement Phase 1. Construction of the first phase was completed in
August 2001. The second phase of the project is the widening of Gaarde Street between 121st
Avenue and Highway 99W. This project includes installation of a new traffic signal at the Gaarde
Street/121st Avenue intersection and improvement of the 121st Avenue approach north of the
intersection. Construction of Gaarde Street (Phase 2) begins in the spring of 2003 and is scheduled
to be completed by the end of calendar year 2003.
Burnham Street(Design and Right-of-Way) Traffic Impact Fee $30,000
The design of this project is approximately 75% completed. The project has been put on hold until a
unified vision of the Tigard downtown is developed and a consensus on elements that would be
incorporated in the street is reached. The funding provided is to demolish and remove two existing
houses on two parcels purchased as part of the rights-of-way acquisition for this project.
1215 Avenue Design and Right-of-Way Traffic Impact Fee $300,000
1215 Avenue between Gaarde and Walnut Street will be designed for widening to the ultimate width of
a collector street. The preliminary design was initiated in FY 2001-02. The design and some right of
way acquisition will be completed in FY 2002-03. The ROW acquisition will be supplemented by
funding from the TIF-Urban Services Fund. Construction and the remaining right-of-way acquisition
will be programmed in future budgets.
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 5 of 16
3
Project Funding Source Amount
Walnut Street Design and Right-of-Way Traffic Impact Fee $300,000
Walnut Street between 12151 and Tiedeman Avenues will be designed for widening to the ultimate
width of a collector street. The preliminary design was initiated in FY 2001-02. The design and
some right of way acquisition will be completed in FY 2002-03. . The ROW acquisition will be
supplemented by funding from the TIF-Urban Services Fund. Construction and the remaining right-
of-way acquisition will be programmed in future budgets.
Durham Road Signalization Traffic Impact Fee $150,000
Traffic on 98th Avenue attempting to turn left on Durham Road typically experiences excessive delay.
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersection to provide safe turning movements at that
intersection. The funding is carried over from FY 2001-02 to complete the project in the fall of 2002.
Greenburg Road Improvements Traffic Impact Fee $676,000
(Washington Square Drive to Tiedeman)
This project improves Greenburg Road from Washington Square Drive to Tiedeman Avenue. The bulk
of the work will be to widen Greenburg Road between the Highway 217 overcrossing and Tiedeman
Avenue to a 5-lane facility. The completed improvements would enhance movement into and out of
the Washington Square Regional Center. The project design and land acquisition are funded through
the Priorities 2000&2002 MTIP funds in the amount of$660,000 with Tigard providing matching
funds of$85,000. The amount of$676,000 will be revised to reflect the entire amount needed for the
project(both federal funding and the local matching funds). Hence,the amount of$745,000 will be
reflected in the approved budget. This is to ensure that the entire federal grant amounts and the full
local matching funds required are available when the project agreement with ODOT and Washington
County is executed.
Preventative Maintenance in the Urban Urban Services $50,000
Services Area
These preventative maintenance projects are funded by Washington County for slurry seals and
overlays on County Roads covered under the Urban Services Agreement.
Bull Mountain/Roshak Road Intersection Traffic Impact Fee Fund $150,000
Improvement Project -Urban Services
This project is the widening of the intersection to enhance safety at that location. This project provides
turning lanes for safer turning movements, and includes minor underground drainage work, but is not
major reconstruction and expansion of that intersection. This project has been proposed to and
approved in concept by Washington County. Implementation is dependent upon approval by the
County to use Urban Services TIF funds for the project.
121St Avenue Rights-of-Way Acquisition TIF-Urban Services $100,000
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 6 of 16
Project Funding Source Amount
The engineering design and limited rights-of-way acquisition for the 12151 Avenue Improvements
(Walnut Street to Gaarde) is funded under the City TIF funds. This funding allocation is to
supplement the City TIF funds in the acquisition of rights-of-way needed for the project.
Walnut Street Rights-of-Way Acquisition TIF-Urban Services $100,000
The engineering design and limited rights-of-way acquisition for the Walnut Street Improvements
(1215` Avenue to Tiedeman) is funded under the City TIF funds. This funding allocation is to
supplement the City TIF funds in the acquisition of rights-of-way needed for the project.
Gaarde Street Phase 2 TIF-Urban Services $500,000
This is to supplement the construction of the Gaarde Street Phase 2 Improvements. The construction
will be funded from City TIF funds with contribution from the Urban Services TIF.
Gaarde Street Improvements Phase 2 Underground Utilities $100,000
This is to partially fund the undergrounding of electrical and other utilities in the project to improve
Gaarde Street between 121" Avenue and Hwy 99W. The underground utility fund is used to place
utilities underground and is typically applied to undergrounding of utilities in the City's major street
improvement projects.
Dartmouth LID Dartmouth LID $9,281
The funding allocated in FY 2002-03 is intended to pay for any further expenses arising from the LID
formed to construct improvements on Dartmouth Street.
Wall Street LID Wall Street LID/CIP $2,000,000
The total amount needed for the Wall Street Improvements from Hall Boulevard to Hunziker is
substantially more than the amount shown above. The Traffic Impact Fee provides $300,000 for
engineering design costs and will be transferred into the Wall Street LID CIP Fund. The balance will
come through formation of a Local Improvement District to perform the project improvements. The
amount requested for FY 2002-03 is the amount anticipated to be needed for the next fiscal year.
The requested amount is allocated as follows: Engineering Design: $300,000
ROW Acquisition: $900,000
Construction: $800,000
Total Streets System Program Budget $655755281
PARKS SYSTEM PROGRAM
The Parks System Program contains land acquisitions for new or expanded parks and open spaces and
improvements to existing parks. The primary source of funding for these projects is the Parks SDC
Fund, which will be renamed the Parks CIP fund for FY 2002-03. The Metro Greenspaces Fund, the
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 7 of 16
1 i
Parks Levy Improvement Fund, and the Tree Replacement Fund provide additional funding. The
funding available from these funds are transferred into the Parks CIP fund for implementation of the
projects in the CIP.
Parks CIP(formerly Parks SDC)
The Parks CIP fund is the City's primary and most consistent funding source for park improvements.
The amounts available from the various other parks-related funds will be consolidated under this fund.
The fee schedule was adopted in 1996 and applies to new development within the incorporated area.
The City Council is currently considering an increase to the Parks SDC fee schedule. In order to
charge a Parks SDC in the Urban Services area, the City must obtain specific legal authority from the
County. The City has had discussions with the County on obtaining this legal authorization,but to date
has not yet obtained it. In combination with development activity, Council's decisions regarding fee
levels and the County's attitude toward an Urban Services SDC will determine how much in SDC
funding will be available for future park improvements.
Park Levy Improvement Fund
The Park Levy Improvement Fund was established to account for funds for a park property tax levy.
That levy is no longer in existence, so funds represent unspent balance of those funds. In addition, the
City received a donation from the estate of a local resident to build a butterfly path in Cook Park. This
gift was placed in this fund. The City plans to phase this fund out. Funds will be transferred to the
Parks SDC fund to provide funding for projects in FY 2002-03.
Metro Greenspaces Fund
The Metro Greenspaces Fund is used for purchases of open spaces using Tigard's share of the Metro
Open Spaces,Parks, and Streams bond proceeds. Funds are provided on a reimbursement basis and can
only be used for purchase of open spaces and limited capital improvements.
Tree Replacement Fund
Developers in Tigard are required to protect as many trees as possible when property is developed.
They are given the option, however, when it is not feasible to protect all trees, to pay a fee to the City.
This fee is used to plant trees in other areas of the City requiring more trees. These fees are accounted
for in the Tree Replacement Fund.
The following are the proposed projects for FY 2002-03.
Project Funding Source Amount
Cook Park Expansion Parks CIP $650,000
Land Acquisition Parks CIP $100,000
Park Development Parks CIP $100,000
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 8 of 16
Project Funding Source Amount
Skateboard Park(Acquisition/Design)
Minimum 3-acre site Parks SDC $200,000
Loan Principal and Interest Parks CIP $295,000
Bonita Park Development Local Parks CIP $19,700
Matching Funds
Bonita Park Playfield,Playground and Parks CIP $140,400
Basketball Court(CDBG Grant)
This is to develop Bonita Park adjacent to Milton Court. The future park is anticipated to include a
playfield, playground and basketball court. The primary source of funding is a Community
Development Block Grant acquired through Washington County supplemented with local matching
funds and funding through the Street System Program for a crosswalk lighting system installation on
Bonita Street at the Milton Court intersection.
Fanno Creek Trail Land Acquisition/Land Parks CIP $50,000
Development- Grant to Main Street(ORPD
Grant)
Fanno Creek Trail Land Acquisition/Land Parks CIP $50,000
Development- Grant to Main Street (SDC
Match)
Woodard Park Playground Phase II Parks CIP $50,000
Installation
Summerlake Park Development(dog Parks CIP $50,000
area/parking)
Greenspace Land Acquisition Parks CIP $50,000
Capital Project Parks Parks CIP $20,000
Tree Planting Expense(Transferred from the Parks CIP $50,000
Tree Replacement Fund)
Total Parks System Program Budget $13,8251,100
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PROGRAM
The Sanitary Sewer System Program contains projects to construct, maintain, and improve the sanitary
sewer system in Tigard. The Clean Water Services Agency of Washington County (CWS) and the
City of Tigard have entered into an agreement for cooperative operation of the Sanitary Sewer System.
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 9 of 16
The City owns, maintains and operates the system within certain limits in a defined service area under
that agreement with CWS. Projects are accounted for in the Sanitary Sewer Fund.
Sanitary Sewer Fund
The Sanitary Sewer Fund resources are reserved for maintenance repairs on currently unknown
projects, for capacity upgrades as recommended from the CWS Master Plan, and for the Neighborhood
and Commercial Area Sewer Extension Programs. The unrestricted portion of the Sanitary Sewer Fund
can be used for repair and maintenance projects Citywide and for extension of the existing system to
unsewered areas. The establishment of the 5-year Citywide Sewer Extension Program by City Council
provides for the installation of sewer service to all developed but unserved areas Citywide. The
funding for these projects will be recouped through the formation of reimbursement districts for the
installation of the sewer lines.
The following projects are proposed for FY 2002-03.
Project Funding Source Amount
Bonita Road (at Milton Court) Sanitary Sewer $150,000
This project is to replace approximately 250 feet of 8-inch sanitary sewer pipe that crosses Fanno
Creek at Milton Court. This project was completely designed and sent out to bid last year. However,
due to excessively high bids submitted at the bid opening, all bids were rejected by the City. This
project was rebid in April 2002 with bid opening in early May. The low bid received was relatively
close to the Engineer's estimate and the project award will be scheduled for early June 2002. The pipe
has been repaired temporarily to address problems that could arise prior to construction.
Citywide Sewer Extension Program Sanitary Sewer $2,000,000
The Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program has been a highly successful program commencing with
its implementation in the 1996-97 CIP budget year. In mid-2001, Council approved the Citywide
Sewer Extension Program to extend sewers to all unserved areas Citywide. FY 2001-02 was the first
year of the 5-year program. The projected number of new services at the end of FY 2001-02 is 120
installed through formation of five reimbursement districts. FY 2002-03 projects will include
formation of districts to provide an estimated 130 services to existing homes. To encourage early
connections, City Council established the Neighborhood Sewer Reimbursement District Incentive
Program. This program limits the amount any owner is required to pay for a share of the public sewer
to $6,000 up to a maximum of$15,000 if the connection is completed within the first three years after
construction.
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program Sanitary Sewer $80,000
These funds would be used to contract out sewer repair projects that are beyond the repair capabilities
of the Public Works Department. This program is expected to be a continuing program in future years.
The Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program in FY 2002-03 will include projects at various
locations in the City.
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 10 of 16
Project Funding Source Amount
110th Avenue(at Derry Dell Creek) Sanitary Sewer $70,000
This project will relocate an existing pipe that runs in the back of two private properties on 110"'
Avenue. The grade of the existing pipe is extremely poor and there is evidence of severe bellying. The
existing pipe will be abandoned and the new pipe will be bored under the creek.
Total Sanitary Sewer System Program $2,3001,000
Budget
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PROGRAM
The Storm Drainage System Program contains projects to construct, maintain, and improve the storm
drainage system in Tigard. The Clean Water Services Agency of Washington County(CWS) regulates
the storm drainage system, but Tigard owns, maintains and operates the system within the City limits.
Projects are funded from the Storm Sewer Fund and the Water Quality/Quantity Fund.
Storm Sewer Fund
The Storm Sewer Fund CIP is supported from storm drainage charges and Systems Development
Charges (SDCs). SDC funds must be used for projects designated in the CWS master plan.
Water Quality/Quantity Fund
Water Quality/Quantity fees are collected by the City on certain development activities in the City.
These charges, which were instituted by CWS, are used to ,fund offsite surface water system
improvements, water quality enhancement projects, and capacity improvements to the storm drainage
system.
The proposed projects for CIP Fiscal Year 2002-03 are as follows:
Project Funding Source Amount
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Storm Sewer $100,000
Program
This program addresses minor storm drainage problems requiring more than normal maintenance
effort. This year's program includes drainage improvements on Commercial Street between 95th
Avenue and Main Street, Walnut Terrace, and other projects at various locations in the City.
Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation Storm Sewer $100,000
The City currently has approximately 4,300 feet of storm drain pipes that are under capacity and
consist of failing pipe materials. This project will rehabilitate 1,200 feet of existing pipes by methods
of pipe bursting or lining.
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 11 of 16
Project Funding Source Amount
Summer Lake Improvements Water Quality/Quantity $25,000
This funding continues the progress on the project in accordance with Council direction. Flow
monitoring and other related studies will be performed to provide information on the feasibility of the
option recommended for this project.
Tiedeman and 1301h Bridge Wetland Water Quality/Quantity $2,500
Mitigation Monitoring
This continues the requirement to monitor the mitigation plantings on the Tiedeman and 130`h
Avenue bridges. The Corps of Engineers requires a 5-year monitoring period. This would be the
fourth year of the monitoring service.
Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Monitoring Water Quality/Quantity $4,500
For construction of Fanno Creek trails, the permit issued by DSL requires that the mitigation area be
monitored for a period of three years, while the Corps of Engineers requires a five-year monitoring
period. The project reports are prepared by a consultant who monitors the survival rate of mitigation
plantings. The first monitoring reports were submitted to DSL and the Corps of Engineers in December
2001.
Total Storm Drainage System $232,000
Program
CITY FACILITIES SYSTEM PROGRAM
The City Facilities System Program contains projects to maintain, improve or expand general purpose
city facilities (such as City Hall) or facilities which do not fit into any of the other CIP Programs (such
as the Library). Funding for these projects come from the General Fund or from the Facility Fund.
General Fund
The General Fund supports CIP projects of a general nature or which serve operations budgeted in the
General Fund. The primary source of revenue is the property tax.
Facility Fund
The Facility Fund provides funding for major capital projects supporting General Fund programs. The
primary sources of revenues for this fund are transfers from the General Fund or donations for specific
projects.
Project Funding Source Amount
HVAC Replacement @ City Hall General $262,500
This project will replace the HVAC System in City Hall.
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 12 of 16
Project Funding Source Amount
Office Renovation—Burnham/Ash Bldg General $43,750
Energy Conservation Improvements @ City General $20,000
Hall
New Library Design and Land Acquisition Facility $3,750,000
This project is under development and involves the design of the new library and land acquisition
costs for the new library site. The amounts set aside for the next fiscal year are design costs, bond
issuance costs, land acquisition costs and initiation of construction. The amounts are allocated as
follows:
• Bond Issuance: $250,000
• Land Acquisition: $2,500,000
• Construction: $1,000,000
Total City Facilities System Program
Budget $490761,250
WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM
The Water System Program contains projects designed to maintain and improve the Tigard water
system. The Tigard water system provides water to portions of the City of Tigard, the cities of King
City and Durham, and an unincorporated area under the jurisdiction of the Tigard Water District. All
of these entities are represented on the Intergovernmental Water Board which approves the capital
program for the system. Projects are accounted for in the Water Fund, the Water SDC Fund, and the
Water CIP Fund.
Water Fund
The Water Fund is the primary operating and maintenance fund of the water system. Revenues come
from water sales and connection fees. This fund supports operations and major capital maintenance
and some system improvements not eligible for funding from Systems Development Charges (SDCs).
Water SDC Fund
The Water SDC Fund accounts for the improvement portion of Systems Development Charges (SDCs)
charged to new development. Money in this fund can only be used for improvements to or expansion
of the current water system needed to support new customers.
Water CIP Fund
The Water CII' Fund is presently reserved for projects to develop a new long-term water supply for the
system. This fund was initially created when the City was exploring the Willamette River as a water
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 13 of 16
supply option. That option is no longer being explored. Money in this fund is therefore being held as a
reserve to pay for whatever long-term supply option is ultimately selected.
The following are the water system projects proposed for FY 2002-03.
Project Funding Source Amount
Meter Replacements Water $40,000
This is the fifth year of a program to replace all 1 1/2-inch and larger meters. The results have shown that
changing out the existing meters can increase water revenues by 10%.
Replacement of defective or malfunctioning Water $15,000
5/8" x 3/4" and 1" meters
The average material cost of$50 per meter is used for budgetary purposes.
Meter Installations Water $60,000
The average material cost of$150 per meter is used for budgetary purposes.
Water Service Installations Water $10,000
Beginning in FY 2000-01, new subdivisions and commercial projects that did not require direct taps into
City water mains for new water services are required to install their own services. This requirement is
standard practice in most cities and water districts and allows the City to focus on routine and
preventative maintenance of the water system. The City does install services for a single lot or a single
service that requires this direct tap. This budgeted amount should be sufficient to cover the costs of these
taps.
Regulator Installations Water $8,000
Fire Hydrant Installation/Replacement Water $100,000
This is an ongoing program to replace the old style Pacific States fire hydrants with new hydrants. The
average cost for each installation is$2,500.
2-inch Line Replacements Water $60,000
Gaarde Street Phase 2 Waterline Relocation Water $200,000
SCADA System Water $175,000
Menlor Pump Station (includes SDC transfer Water $675,000
of$394,875)
Security Vulnerability Evaluation and Water $30,000
Upgrades
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 14 of 16
Project Funding Source Amount
Water Main Oversizing Program Water SDC $50,000
This project will pay for oversizing water mains in new developments.
Secure 550-foot Reservoir(2 sites) Water SDC $350,000
Aquifer Storage and Recovery (pilot test) Water CIP $85,000
The pilot test spans two fiscal years. This amount is to be carried over to FY 2002-03.
Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Phase 2 Water CIP $370,000
The City is currently in the second year of conducting a feasibility study to determine if ASR is a viable
solution to meet interim water supply needs. Phase 2 includes permitting and obtaining water rights,
wellhead modifications, and an ASR pilot test.
Water Supply-Feasibility Report Water CIP $80,000
"Clean Water Services-Scoggins Dam Raise"
Bull Run Regional Authority-Phase II Report Water CIP $25,000
JWC-Raw Water Pipeline Pre-design Water CIP $85,000
JWC-Fernhill Reservoir Pre-design Water CIP $25,000
Total Water System Program Budget $294439000
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
The failure of Ballot Measure 34-20 in the November 2000 election means that no funding is available
to construct some greatly needed street reconstruction and expansion projects during the next few
years. In addition, the State Gas Tax has not been increased during the past decade. The amount
available from those revenues for corrective and preventative maintenance are not sufficient to
adequately address the $2 million dollar backlog of maintenance needs. As operating and materials
costs increase, the amount available from the Gas Tax Fund is expected to decrease each year.
Attached is Appendix G showing the preventative/corrective maintenance funding requirements, and
the major street projects that will not have adequate funding over the next few years.
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 15 of 16
APPENDICES
■ Appendix A: Street System Program
■ Appendix B: Park System Program
■ Appendix C: Sanitary Sewer System Program
■ Appendix D: Storm Drainage System Program
■ Appendix E: City Facilities System Program
■ Appendix F: Water System Program
■ Appendix G: Unfunded Projects
■ Appendix H: 2001-02 Capital Improvement Program
c: William A.Monahan, City Manager
Craig Prosser,Finance Director
Ed Wegner,Public Works Director
Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director
Vannie T. Nguyen, CIP Division Manager
I:\ENG\GUS\2002-03 CIP\2002-03 Capital Improvement Program—Planning Commission.doc
Memorandum to Planning Commission
FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program
Page 16 of 16
STREET SYS 1N1 PROGRAM
PROJE •'.
cam, o
safi;a'� r:' «�' :a
1-
FY 2002-03
Gaarde Street Improvements Phase 2 $1,600,000 $500,000 $100,000 $2,200,000
121st Avenue Design and ROW $300,000 $300,000
Walnut Street Design And ROW $300,000 $300,000
121st Avenue ROW $100,000 $100,000
Walnut Street ROW $100,000 $100,000
Burnham Street(Design and ROW) $30,000 $30,000
Durham Road Signalization $150,000 $150,000
Greenburg Road(Washington Square Drive to
Tiedeman Avenue) $76,000 $600,000 $676,000
Dartmouth Street LID $9,281 $9,281
Wall Street LID $2,000,000 $2,000,000
Embedded Crosswalk Lights $25,000 $25,000
Pavement Major Maintenance Program $135,000 $135,000
Traffic Calming Program $10,000 $10,000
72nd Avenue Railroad Approaches $30,000 $30,000
North Dakota Street Pedestrian Bridge $65,000 $65,000
Mapleleaf Street $65,000 $65,000
Walnut Terrace $60,000 $60,000
North Dakota Street(Greenburg to 95th) $120,000 $120,000
County Roadway Maintenance Projects $50,000 $50,000
Bull Mountain/Roshak Road Intersection $150,000 $150,000
Totals for FY 2002-03 $2,456,000 $510,000 $2,009,281 $50,000 $850,000 $100,000 $600,000 $6,575,281
FY 2003-04
TIF Reserve for Projects $470,000 $470,000
Gaarde Street Improvements Phase 2 Completioi $500,000 $500,000
Walnut Street and 121st Avenue ROW $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000
Pavement Major Maintenance Program $100,000 100000
Wall Street LID $1,300,000 1300000
Traffic Calming Program $10,000 10000
County Roadway Maintenance Projects $50,000 50000
Underground Utility Reserve for Future Projects $80,000 80000
Totals for FY 2003-04 $1,470,000 $110,000 $1,300,000 $50,000 $80,000 $3,010,000
FY 2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
May 9,2002 APPENDIX A Page A-1
STREET SYSTEM PROGRAM
PROJ>�C;
,
Via{ n
.ni �d'#v ''F §:f .Y:. 1 . , A;..,g "r $ ' P"'�Q•{s&, ;�_, a�, f'� 'ii. iYv"k MWAQ1�tJ.
�1P
FY 2004-05
TIF Reserve for Projects $2,253,000 $2,253,000
Wall Street LID $2,500,000
Traffic Studies $30,000 30000
Pedestrian Improvements $50,000 50000
Pavement Major Maintenance Program $100,000 100000
Traffic Calming Program $10,000 10000
County Roadway Maintenance Projects $50,000 50000
Underground Utility Reserve for Future Projects $160,000 160000
Totals for FY 2004-05 $2,253,000 $190,000 $2,500,000 $50,000 $160,000 $5,153,000
FY 2005-6
TIF Reserve for Projects $2,853,000 $2,853,000
Wall Street LID $1,200,000
Pedestrian Improvements $30,000 30000
Pavement Major Maintenance Program $100,000 100000
Traffic Calming Program $10,000 10000
County Roadway Maintenance Projects $50,000 50000
Underground Utility Reserve for Future Projects $240,000 240000
Totals for FY 2005-06 $2,853,000 $140,000 $1,200,000 $50,000 $240,000 $4,483,000
FY 2006-07
TIF Reserve for Projects $3,353,000 $3,353,000
Pedestrian Improvements $30,000 30000
Pavement Major Maintenance Program $100,000 100000
Traffic Calming Program $10,000 10000
County Roadway Maintenance Projects $50,000 50000
Underground Utility Reserve for Future Projects $320,000 320000
Totals for FY 2006-07 $3,353,000 $140,000 $50,000 $320,000 $3,863,000
Note: The City TIF funds will be reimbursed by MSTIP 3 for Walnut Street Phase 2 in accordance with the IGA
with Washington County. The reimbursement begins in FY 2002-03 and is included in the TIF Reserve amounts
above.
FY 2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
May 9,2002 APPENDIX A Page A-2 _
PARKS SYS1 4 PROGRAM
PTtOECT 4xa^ �r' sG sM�1 EP )wft
a"
' }}''
FY 2002-03
Cook Park Expansion $650,000 $650,000
Land Acquisition $100,000 $100,000
Park Development $100,000 $100,000
Skateboard Park(Acquisition/Design) $200,000 $200,000
Loan Principal and Interest $295,000 $295,000
Bonita Park Development(Local Matching
Funds) $19,700 $19,700
Bonita Park Playfield,Playground and
Basketball Court(CDBG Grant) $140,400 $140,400
Fanno Creek Trail Land Acquisition/Land
Development-Grant to Main Street(ORPD
Grant) $50,000 $50,000
Fanno Creek Trail Land Acquisition/Land
Development-Grant to Main Street(SDC
Match) $50,000
Woodard Park Playground Phase II Installation $50,000
Summerlake Park Development(dog
area/parking) $50,000
Greenspace Land Acquisition $50,000
Capital Project Parks $20,000
Tree Planting Expense(transferred from the
Tree Replacement Fund) $50,000
Totals for FY 2002-03 $1,825,100 $1,825,100
FY 2003-04
Summerlake Master Plan $490,000 $490,000
Totals for FY 2003-04 $490,000 $490,000
FY 2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
May 9,2002 APPENDIX B Page B-1
PARKS SYSTEM PROGRAM
P ■/�< Ym y
n.
FY 2004-05
Hall/Bonita Trail $416,000 $416,000
Totals for FY 2004-05 $416,000 $416,000
FY 2005-06
Bonita Road/Durham Trail $415,000 $415,000
Totals for FY 2005-06 $415,000 $415,000
FY 2006-07
Jack Park Land Acquisition $450,000 $450,000
Totals for FY 2006-07 $450,000 $450,000
FY 2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
May 9,2002 APPENDIX B Page B-2
SANITARY SEWED YSTEM PROGRAM
FY 2002-03
Bonita Road(at Milton court) $150,000
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $80,000
Citywide Sewer Extension Program $2,000,000
110th Avenue (at Derry Dell Creek) $70,000
Total for FY 2002-03 $2,300,000
Fy 2003-04
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $80,000
Citywide Sewer Extension Program $2,000,000
Totals for FY 2003-04 $2,080,000
FY 2004-05
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $80,000
Citywide Sewer Extension Program $2,000,000
Totals for FY 2004-05 $2,080,000
FY 2005-06
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $80,000
Citywide Sewer Extension Program $1,000,000
Totals for FY 2005-06 $1,080,000
FY 2006-07
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $80,000
Citywide Sewer Extension Program $1,000,000
Totals for FY 2006-07 $1,080,000
FY 2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
May 9, 2002 APPENDIX C Page C-1
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PROGRAM
FY 2002-03
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program $100,000 $100,000
Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation $100,000 $100,000
Summer Lake Improvements $25,000 $25,000
Tiedeman and 130th Bridge Wetland
Mitigation Monitoring $2,500 $2,500
Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Monitoring $4,500 $4,500
Total for FY 2002-03 $200,000 $32,000 $232,000
FY 2003-04
Reserve for CWS Master Plan $40,000 $40,000
Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects $40,000 $40,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $60,000 $60,000
Totals for FY 2003-04 $100,000 $40,000 $140,000
FY 2004-05
Reserve for CWS Master Plan $80,000 $80,000
Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects $80,000 $80,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $60,000 $60,000
Totals for FY 2004-05 $140,000 $80,000 $220,000
FY 2005-06
Reserve for CWS Master Plan $120,000 $120,000
Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects $140,000 $140,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $40,000 $40,000
Totals for FY 2005-06 $180,000 $120,000 $300,000
FY 2006-07
Reserve for CWS Master Plan $160,000 $160,000
Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects $200,000 $200,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $40,000 $40,000
Totals for FY 2006-07 $240,000 $160,000 $400,000
FY 2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
May 9,2002 APPENDIX D Page D-1
CITY FACILITIES A STEM PROGRAM
r�' p frt .s:..k ..... k"u t ^s 1tt ,c; Cr ..9 ,,
PRO CT ,j n g
..u, x
FY 2002-03
Replacement of HVAC System in City Hall $262,500 $262,500
Office Renovation-Burnham/Ash Bldg $43,750 $43,750
Energy Conservation Improvements @ City Hall $20,000 $20,000
New Library(Bond Issuance,Design, Land
Acquisition and Initial Construction) $3,750,000 $3,750,000
Totals for FY 2002-03 $326,250 $3,750,000 $4,076,250
FY 2003-04
HVAC Replacement-Senior Center $165,000
Seismic Upgrade-Police Department $40,000
Seismic Upgrade-Senior Center $40,000
New Library(Construction) $7,315,000 $7,315,000
Totals for FY 2003-04 $245,000 $7,315,000 $7,560,000
FY 2004-05
New Library Construction $2,935,000 $2,935,000
Renovation of City Hall and Old Library Buildings $500,000 $500,000
HVAC Replacement-Existing Library $260,000 $260,000
Seismic Upgrade-City Hall $50,000 $50,000
Totals for FY 2004-05 $310,000 $3,435,000 $3,745,000
FY 2005-06
Renovation of City Hall and Old Library Buildings $500,000 $50.0,000
HVAC Replacement-Water Building $360,000
Totals for FY 2005-06 $310,000 $4,295,000 $4,605,000
FY 2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
May 9,2002 APPENDIX E Page E-1
CITY FACILITIES SYSTEM PROGRAM
I,. € "}
FY 2006-07
Miscellaneous City facility projects $250,000 $200,000 $450,000
Seismic Upgrade-Senior Center $40,000 $40,000
Totals for FY 2006-07 $290,000 $200,000 $490,000
FY 2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
May 9,2002 APPENDIX E Page E-2
WATER SYS' ✓I PROGRAM
FY 2002-03
Meter Replacements. This is the fifth year of a
program to replace all 1 1/2-inch and larger meters.
The results have shown that changing out the
existing meters can increase water revenues by
10%. $40,000 $40,000
Replacement of defective or malfunctioning 5/8"
x 3/4" and I" meters. $15,000 $15,000
Meter Installations. The average material cost of
$150 per meter is used for budgetary purposes. $60,000 $60,000
Water Service Installations. Beginning in FY
2000-01,new subdivisions and commercial projects
that did not require direct taps into City water
mains for new water services are required to install
their own services.This requirement is standard
practice in most cities and water districts and
allows the City to focus on routine and preventative
maintenance of the water system.The City does
install services for a single lot or a single service
that requires this direct tap.This budgeted amount
should be sufficient to cover the costs of these taps. $10,000 $10,000
Regulator Installations $8,000 $8,000
Fire Hydrant Installation/Replacement.This is
an ongoing program to replace the old style Pacific
States fire hydrants with new hydrants. $100,000 $100,000
2-inch Line Replacements $60,000 $60,000
Gaarde Street Phase 2 Waterline Relocation $200,000 $200,000
FY 2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
May 9,2002 APPENDIX F Page F-1
WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM
SCADA System $175,000 $175,000
Menlor Pump Station(includes SDC transfer of
$394,875) $675,000
Security Vulnerability Evaluation and Upgrades $30,000
Water Main Oversizing Program-This project
will pay for oversizing water mains in new
developments. $50,000
Secure 550-foot Reservoir(2 sites) $350,000
Aquifer Storage and Recovery(Pilot Test) $85,000
Aquifer Storage and Recovery(ASR)Phase 2.
The City is currently in the second year of
conducting a feasibility study to determine if ASR
is a viable solution to meet interim water supply
needs. Phase 2 includes permitting and obtaining
water rights,wellhead modifications,and an ASR
pilot test. $370,000 $370,000
Water Supply-Feasibility Report ("Clean Water
Services-Scoggins Dam Raise") $80,000 $80,000
Bull Run Regional Authority-Phase II Report $25,000 $25,000
JWC-Raw Water Pipeline Pre-design $85,000 $85,000
JWC-Fernhill Reservoir Pre-design $25,000 $25,000
Totals for FY 2002-03 $1,373,000 $400,000 $670,000 $2,443,000
FY 2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
May 9,2002 APPENDIX F Page F-2
WATER SYS'', -4 PROGRAM
FY 2003-04
Construction of 550-foot reservoir,capacity 2.0
million gallons(to be constructed and funded over
two fiscal years) $1,400,000 $1,400,000
Water Main Installation(SW Burnham Street from
SW Hall Blvd to SW Main Street) $319,200 $319,200
Water Main Oversizing Program $75,000 $75,000
ASR Study Phase 3 $25,000 $25,000
Totals for FY 2003-04 $1,819,200
FY 2004-5
550-Foot Reservoir Construction $1,400,000 $1,400,000
Water Main Oversizing Program $75,000 $75,000
Totals for FY 2004-05 $1,475,000
FY 2005-6
Transfer Pump Station $1,050,000 $1,050,000
Water Main Oversizing Program $75,000 $75,000
Totals for FY 2005-06 $1,125,000
FY 2006-7
East 550-foot Reservoir Supply Feed $380,000 $380,000
Water Main Oversizing Program $75,000 $75,000
Reserve for Projects $600,000 $600,000
Totals for FY 2006-07 $1,055,000
FY 2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
May 9,2002 APPENDIX F Page F-3
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
STREET SYSTEM PROGRAM
Preventative and Corrective Maintenance Projects
The following is a brief description of the unfunded Street System projects considered for Gas Tax
Funding in FY 2002-03.
• A large number of streets are in need of slurry seals and overlays, but were $750,000
not included in FY 2002-03 because of funding limitations. Segments of 72"a
Avenue, Durham Road, Bonita Road, Ross Street, 67t'', 69t' (North of
Dartmouth), Thorn Street, 121s' Avenue, North Dakota Street, Greenburg
Road, and others are currently in need of repair and pavement overlay to
improve pavement condition and rideability.
• 98`h Avenue (Greenburg Road to Pihas Court) - This project will acquire $220,000
right-of-way and widen approximately 750 feet of 98`h Avenue on the west
side of the street, construct curb and sidewalk and connect to an existing
sidewalk on 98th Avenue at Pihas Court. Minor drainage improvements are
also included in the project.
x �
The following unfunded projects are some of the major reconstruction and widening projects that are
needed to accommodate the existing and future traffic on the City's major and minor collector streets:
Street Major Reconstruction and Expansion Projects
Category Project Project Cost
Collectors
121 st Avenue—Walnut to North Dakota $2,030,000
Walnut Street—Tiedeman to 121 st $4,990,000
121 st Avenue—Gaarde to Walnut $3,760,000
Burnham Street—Main to Hall $1,570,000
Tiedeman Ave. —Greenburg to Tigard St. $860,000
72"a Avenue- Hampton to Dartmouth $1,500,000
Neighborhood Routes
Fonner Street- Walnut to 115th Avenue $1,570,000
Tigard Street—Main to Tiedeman(south side) $990,000
Commercial Street(North side, Main St. to Lincoln St.) $460,000
n
f� ,',-•s-
A ,
1AEng%Gus\2002-03 CIMUnfunded Pmjects-2002-03.doc
APPENDIX G
Unfunded Street System Projects
Page 1 of 1