01/05/1989 - Packet AGENDA,
CITY CENTER PLAN TASK FORCE
THURSDAY, JANUARY 5, 1989, 7:00 P.M. - 9:00 P.M.
TIGARD CIVIC CHER - TOWN HAIL,
13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OR
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL: ASH COHEN JUAREZ MARR
NDN mord" HERKEE
3. APPROVE MINUTES
4. Review Urban Design Plan Element
Guthrie and Stastney
5. Review Newsletter Draft: Newton
6. City Center Development Update: Roberts
7. Other business
8. Ad jourrnment
'+CITY CENTER PLAN TASK FURCE
LIST OF NONCONEMMG AND CCNDITIONAL USE BUSINESSES IOCATED IN 'IIS
(ORAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
Nonconfonning Businesses in kms of Use:
Residential:
(18) Single-Family Detached Residences (expansion allowed)
Cascade Mobile Villa
Light Manufacturing:
Burnham Business Park
Barkwell
Johnny Top Canopies
A=ature Coil
Sign Craft
Precision Graphics
Construction Sales and Service:
Modern Plumbing
Tigard Electric
Famil ian Northwest
Autarobile and Equipment Storage:
Nine-T-Nine Towing Lot
Agricultural:
Tigard Feed and Garden
Agricultural Horticulture Services:
Icon Landscape Co.
Nonconforming in Terms of Other Criteria:
Open Storage:
(Familian Northwest)
A-Boy
Stevens Marine
GTE Operations Center
Parking, Larmclscaparmg, Other:
Most business on Main Street
Conditional Use Businesses:
Utilities:
GTE Office and Maintenance Facility
GTE Service Center
Tri-Met Transfer Center
Greyhound Bus Depot
City Operations Center
Tigard Water District Administrative and Operations Center
M olesale Distribution:
Stash Zea
Magno-Hmphries Phamaceutical
Familian Northwest
Vehicle Fuel Sales:
Tigard Arco
NONCONFORMI NG USES
Q
or
,
O °
� o0
pO O/�
EJ
0
OD moi.
o
c= 00
u
---------------
18.66.030 Permitted Uses
Permitted Usti the CBO district are as follows: �wr'
(1) Civic Use Types
(A) Civic services
(B) Community Recreation
(C) Cultural exhibits and library services
(D) Lodges, fraternal and civic assembly
(E) Parking facilities
(F) Postal services
(G) Public agency administrative services
(H) Public safety services
(I) Public support facilities
(J) Religious Assembly
(2) Commercial Use Types
(A) Amusement Enterprises
(B) Animal sales and services
(i) Grooming
(ii) Veterinary: small animals
(C) Automotive and Equipment
(i) Cleaning
(ii) Repairing: light equipment
(0) Building maintenance services
(E) Business equipment sales and services
(F) Business support services
(G) Communication services
(H) Convenient sales and personal services
(I) Eating and drinking establishments
(J) Financial, insurance and real estate services
(K) Food and beverage sales
(L) Medical and dental services
(M) Participation sports and recreation:
(i) Indoor
(ii) Outdoor
(N) Personal services: general
(0) Professional and administrative services
(P) Religious Assembly
(Q) Repair services: consumer
(R) Retail sales: general
(S) Transient lodging
(3) Residential Use Types (See R-40 and R-12 for development
standards)
(A) Single family attached residential units
(8) Multiple family residential units
The CBO zoning district allows for R-40 residential
development except within the area south of Fanno Creek
defined as follows:
All lands bounded by Fanno Creek, Hall Blvd., Omara, Ash
Ave. and Hill Street within the CBD shall be designated
R-12 (PO) and shall be developed as planned developments in
conformance with the R-12 district standards.
(C) Home Occupations subject to provisions of Chapter 18.142.
18.66.040 Conditional Use (Section 18.130)
Conditional Uses in the CBD district are as follows:
(1) Adult Entertainment
(2) Automotive and Equipment Sales/Retail, Light Equipment
(3) Day Care Facilities
(4) Utilities
(5) Heliports, in accordance with the Aeronautics Division
(ODOT) and the FAA
(6) Hospitals
(7) Spectator Sport and Entertainment Facilities
(8) Group Care Residential
(9) Vehicle Fuel Sales
(10) Wholesale, Storage and Distribution, Light
F� CIT ENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN TIMELIh
V�
DATE WHAT WHO
January 23 Update/Status Report - Timeline City Council
and Products. Staff
January 26 Review 2nd Draft Design Concept CCPTF
Plan, Review 1st Draft City Ctr. Consultants
Development Plan.
February 1 Review 2nd Draft City Center Dev. CCPTF
Plan. Consultants
February 3 Presentation - Design Concept CCPTF
Plan, Release City Center Dev. Consultants
Plan draft to Public BREAKFAS
February 7 Presentation - City Center Dev. CCPTF
Plan Draft to Planning Commission Consultants
WORKSHOP. P.C. , Staff
February 9 Discussion - Public comment on CCPTF
City Center Development Plan. Staff
February 13 cc_ Consider formation of City Center City Council
Development Agency. CCPTF, Staff
February 14 Present City Center Development CCPTF
Plan - SUMMERFIELD. Staff
February 21 Planning Commission consideration Plann. Comm.
Adoption of Final Order - recommend CCPTF
City Council adopt City Center Dev. Staff
Plan.
February 27 C e First Hearing on Ordinance to adopt City Council
City Center Development Plan. CCPTF
a
March 6 Cc- Second on Ordinance to adopt City Council
City Center Development Plan. CCPTF
440W
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — DECEMBER 12, 1088, 1008 — 6
1 . ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Tum Brian; Councilors: Valerie
and John Schwartz; Councilor—Elect Kasten; City Staff: Pat Reilly, C.
Administrator; Ed Murphy, Community Development Director; Liz Newton,
Senior Planner; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Duane Roberts, Associate
Planner; Catherine Wheatley, Deputy City Recorder; and Randall Wooley,
City Engineer.
2 , WORKSHOP WITH CITY CENTER PLAN TASK FORCE
a. City Center Plan Task Force Members Present: Stuart Cohen,
Chairman; Committee Members: Jolynne Ash, Joy Henkle, Pam Juarez,
Mike Marr, Bill Monahan, and Richard Morley. Also present was Ex
Officio Member Peggy Weston Byrd.
b. Senior Planner Newton advised that the purpose of this meeting was
to:
u Serve as a progress checkpoint on the City Center Plan.
o Present for review and comment a Conceptual City Center
Plan. (Note: The presentation of the conceptual plan at
this meeting was the first time the Committee and Council had
had an opportunity to review. )
o Review of the project timeline.
Senior Planner Newton reviewed the history of the City Center Plan
Task Force' s (CCPTF) progress to date, noting they were formed
about 18 months ago. Initially, the CCPTF developed a "Vision
Statement" and then hired the consulting firm of Hobson and
Associates to review whether or not the "Vision Statement" would be
feasible. Hobson and Associates encouraged the City to proceed
with recommendations that investments be made in Fanno Creek Park,
improvements be done for aooeuu to the downtown area, and to
develop a master plan to guide future development. At that point,
Muraoe and Associates were hired to complete the Master Plan.
A Transportation Plan was produced by Kittlmuon & Associates which
focused on aooeooen in and through downtown.
Senior Planner Newton advised that the consultants of
Guthriu/Sluyarenkn/Aoyooiateo with Staotny Architects would be
reviewing the urban design plan element at this meeting. Thio
conceptual review would give form to the "Vision Statement. ''
Senior Planner Newton noted alternatives for financing and
implementation of revitalization efforts were also being studied.
Chairman Stuart Cohen introduced Consultants Bart Guthrie and
Donald Staotny.
The consultants presented slides; a copy of the draft report was
submitted for Counoil review. (Note: The draft report has been
filed with Council packet material . )
Page 1 — COUNCIL MINUTES — DECEMBER 12, 1988
It was stressed that this would be a long—range plan
implementation scheduled over a 80—year period. *'
Some of the consultants' comments during the presentation were as
follows:
u The plan design program was reviewed. A conservative
approach with regard to percent of the market which could be
captured was recommended .
'
u The demand for retail space was projected to level off in the
range of 300,000 to 350,000 square feet while that for
commercial office space was expected to continue a linear
growth curve to a range of 450,000 to 600,000 feet.
o There was a potential demand for 1,440 multi—family units in
the City Center.
o Main Street would be the major retail street with Tigard
Street and Burnham Street developed to provide a better
connection through to the Washington Square area.
o The Fanno Creek Park strip would be a primary resource for
attracting development.
u The transportation infrastructure was reviewed. It was noted
that light rail would be feasible within the 30—year
implementation strategy,
u Development of the plan concept would include park space,
public open space, and public structures .
o Development of a land use plan would be advisable.
o Design districts would serve to direct development. The
draft report stated that the objective was to create design
districts with distinct and identifiable imageo .
The design districts identified in the city center were as
follows :
1. Main Street
2. Tigard/Burnham Street
3. Fanno Creek Park Edge
4. Railway/Commercial Street
5. Hall Blvd.
6. Civic Center
o The otreetuoape for Main Street was reviewed, One item noted
by the consultants was the use of banners along the streets
for advertising both public events and businesses .
o Utilization of the the idea of a "City in the Park" was
advisable.
Page 2 — COUNCIL MINUTES — DECEMBER 12, 1988
44010 ' '�
u Main Street could be built modestly over time with an infill- �
strategy. At some point in time, a parking structure would
be required.
o The consultants presented slides which illustrated different
configurations of buildings including structures for parking,
housing, commercial uses, and residential areas .
o Seven entry portals into the downtown area were identified.
o A "Tower Element" was proposed in the conceptual plan. Tower
structures at strategic locations in the downtown area were
shown on the plans.
C. After the consultant' s presentation, there were questions and
statements of concern from business and property owners with regard
to how the plan would affect them.
Committee and Council members advised that involvement by the
downtown property/business owners was crucial to the downtown
revitalization effort. It was noted that the urban design plan was
to be used as a "anchor" for community discussion in determine how
much of the concept plan was feasible. The final plan would be the
result of an agreement between downtown business/property owners,
the Committee, and City Council.
Chair Cohen noted financing alternatives were being reviewed and
studied. Approximately 13 to 15 different methods of financing had
been listed by the financial consultant to date.
One of the areas of concern expressed by individuals in the
audience was zoning; i .e. , how would the zoning changes be
transitioned? The consultants responded that rebuilding of the
city center would take many years and would require the effort of
many citizens who accepted a "common vision. " Land use would
probably be determined on a case—by—case basis un that the en6
result would be that of a distinctive downtown area. Mike Marr
noted the community input process was just beginning and the plan
was still far from final form.
The process to follow at this point in time was outlined as follows:
1 . Agree on a concept.
2. Submit one of several implementation tools to a vote (i .e. ,
tax increment financing) .
3 . City Council would designate zone changes through a series of
public hearings.
Mayor Brian reminded everyone why the City Center Task Force was
formed. He recalled that the Central Business District had been
identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Subsequently, there was a
question as to whether the downtown area should remain zoned
Central Business District or be changed to Light Industrial , In
order to attract more business the Committee, after conuidermble
Page 3 — COUNCIL MINUTES — DECEMBER 12^ 1988
research, reached the conclusion that the downtown area sh0ulc
remain Zoned "Central Business District" with the focus on busines
types of uses in the downtown area.
Don Stast:ny, of St:astny Architects, predicted a reaffirmation of
small town centers, noting that Tigard was in a strategic location
with regard to regional business influences due to the confluence
of Highway 217, Highway 99, and 15. He advised that he saw the
potential for very strong development:.
Senior planner Newton reviewed the following timeline:
Date What Who
Dec. 12 Presentation of Consultant CCPI-i=/CC
Draft Design Report
Jan. 5 Review Draft CCPl'F=
Design Report
Jan, 12 Revised Draft Out Consultant/CCPI"F=
for Public Comment
Jan. 30 Revisions Based on Consultant/CCPIF
Public.. Input:
Feb. 3 Design Concept Plan CCPI-F
to CC, PC, Public Staff
Feb. 7 Planning Commission Planning Commission
Hearing
Feb. 13 City Council Hearing Council
(1st Ordinance Reading)
Feb. 27 Council. Action on Plan Council
(Form District)
Mar. 15 Ballot 'Title to CC staff
Mar. 2./ Action on Ballot Council.
April 6 File Ballot with Staff
Washington County
May 16 Election Voters
d. The City Center Plan Task Force/Council. Workshop adjourned at:
8:30 P.M.
Page 4 COUNCIL.. MINUTES .-. DECEMBER 12, 1988
r
Dfvl fLa,
CITY COUNCIL MEETING UPDATE
12/12/88
1. Call To Order and Roll Call Ed & Ea absent
2. WORKSHOP WITH CITY CENTER PLAN TASK FORCE
Presentation by Gutherie/Slusarenko/Assoc. with Stastny Architects of
the Urban Design Plan Element (slide show); noted that financing issues
were being studied separately. Discussion followed. Questions from
property owners noting concerns of how this would affect them. Council
and Task Force members noted this was conceptual only. Involvement and
input needed from downtown property owners.
Consultant noted strategic location of Tigard; i.e., confluence of Hwy
2173, 99 & I-5 with future light rail. Potential for very strong
development.
Timeline reviewed - 1/5/89 next CCPTF meeting; late January/early
February information gathering process (input from community) to
commence.
3. UPDATE ON STREET BOND ISSUE
o Reviewed priority list; discussed project timelines.
o Reviewed role of Council
o Reviewed suggested public involvement methods
o Reviewed policy issues concerning new development; staff to
prepare policy statement for Council consideration. (i.e. ,
half-street improvements not required for developments abutting
roads to be improved under bond issue. Submit in policy statement
that right-of-way should not be required to be purchased by City
when 1/2 street improvements have been waived.)
4. SINGLE OWNER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISCUSSION (PACTRUST)
Reviewed proposal from PacTrust for development of Pacific Corporate
Center (surrounded by I-5, Carman Drive, Upper Boones Fy. Rd., S.W.
72nd Avenue; Bonita Road). Council consensus: Single owner LID's
acceptable subject to:
1. Applicant to provide appraisal of ppty affected; appraisal to be
done by appraiser acceptable to the City.
2. Financial documents shall be provided as required by City Attorney.
3. Bond amount shall not exceed 25% of appraised property value.
4. "Public good" demonstrated
Staff will prepare formal, written policy for Council review and
approval.
Council consensus: Acceptable for PacTrust to proceed with development
process.
5. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: None
6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Cancelled
7. ADJOURNMENT 10:40 p.m.
cw/8262D
*001
PARKS MASTER PLANS � '✓� ,�
DESIGN NARRATIVE
City of Tigard, Oregon
December, 1988
(DRAFT)
Introduction
Master Plans for the City of Tigard's Cook, Fanno and Summerlake
Parks have been prepared to help direct the further development
of these community recreational resources. The Master Plans have
been developed through the collaborative efforts of the Park
Board, City staff and interested citizens. Facilities and site
improvements identified in the Master Plans are needed to meet
the present and future recreational needs for the citizens of
Tigard. When the plans are implemented, both Tigard and the
larger metropolitan area will benefit.
Besides meeting the recreational needs of the community, and
preserving important natural areas, the implementation of the
Master Plan will work to support commercial and residential
development in the City. The development of Fanno Park will
directly complement the City Center Improvement Plans. The
outdoor recreational opportunities offered in the park will
attract area residents to the Main Street area and increase their
exposure to this commercial center. Further, the park
improvements will provide an attractive setting for the
commercial area, making it more attractive to shoppers and the
commercial clients.
The improvements at all these parks will significantly expand the
variety and quantity of recreational facilities available for the
citizens of Tigard. This expansion of recreational opportunity
will enhance the livability of the community and its
attractiveness for the area's residents.
vrrr
Fanno Park
The proposed boundaries of Fanno Park lie within the 100 year
floodplain on either side of Fanno Creek between Main Street and
Hall Boulevard. This site is a segment of a proposed greenway
corridor which runs the length of the Creek, within the City of
Tigard, extending downstream to the confluence with the Tualatin
River. The park's function as a part of this linear corridor,
the natural environments which make up most of the proposed park,
its location in a floodway, and it's contiguousness to both the
Main Street commercial area, the Civic Center, Senior Center at
residential areas are all important factors which directed the
development of the Master Plan.
The objectives which the Master Plan hoped to achieve include:
1. Public land acquisition needed to complete the securing
of this segment of the greenway and park.
2. Completion of this segment of the greenway's trail
system.
3. Development of recreation areas to support activities
in the Main Street commercial area and at the Civic
Center.
4. Preservation of the habitat corridor.
5. Through the development of recreational facilities,
nature interpretative displays, and by other means
improving the public's recognition and complementary
use of this part of their community's recreation
resource system.
6. Identifying features and facilities in the park which
are compatible with, and tolerant of periodic flooding.
Presently only the eastern portion of the proposed park is under
public ownership. The portion of the floodplain west of the
Civic Center still needs to be placed in public hands. In
addition, a key parcel which is out of the floodplain, at the
western edge facing onto Main Street, needs to be obtained to
provide adequate visual and physical access and presence for the
park in that important commercial corridor.
An 8-foot wide paved path is called for to run the entire length
of the park. This path and smaller segments connecting it to the
northern and southern edges of the park will provide access to
and through Fanno Park. Creating adequate linkage through the
park is especially important because of its role in the larger
greenway trail system. To assure an adequate route for through
travel, a pathway on the southern edge of this park is shown for
the segment west of the proposed Ash Street extension. This will
be needed when the area on the north side of the Creek is fully
developed and becomes too congested to be a suitable trail route.
Provision of more cultural or active recreational areas to
provide support at the Main Street commercial area and Civic
Center, and the preservation and enhancement of natural areas
leads to the delineation of three areas within the park. The
first area is referred to as the "Main Street Plaza and Water
Garden. " This area lies to the north of the creekbed and extends
from Main Street, east to the Ash Street extension. This area is
designed to be intensively used and programmed for a variety of
recreational, civic, and commercial functions. The ability to
provide for numerous activities and functions will make this a
strong attraction for the community, and thereby serve to support
the adjacent commercial area, as well as meet the community's
need for recreation. This site is seen as an important part of
developing the Main Street and City Center area into an important
focus for the citizens of Tigard and surrounding areas. The
elements shown in this area are designed to be integrated into
the future commercial establishments to be developed along this
segment of the River.
Facing on Main Street is a paved urban plaza. Portals mark the
edge of the square and the entry to the park. Steps along the
southern edge of. the square lead directly down to the Creek,
reinforcing the physical and visual connection of the waterway to
the park adjacent to the commercial area. In the Creek, adjacent
to the plaza, water steps (small waterfalls) are indicated.
These help improve water quality and provide visual and auditory
interest for the park.
East of the plaza, in the area of the existing large open field
and small existing pond, a new large pond is shown. This pond
functions as a visual focus for this part of the park,
reinforcing the water-oriented theme of the park. In addition,
this larger body of water serves to enhance the habitat diversity
of the park, buffer the natural areas from more intensively- used
portions of the park and thereby support a more stable
environment for birds and other wildlife in the park. A large
water jet is indicated in the center of the pond. This, or a
similar feature, functions as a visual focus, while improving the
water quality of the pond and masking sounds from the nearby
Pacific Highway.
On the northern shore, trees and green lawns lead down to the
edge of the pond where varieties of water-loving herbaceous
perennials, and shrubs would be planted. The theme of this area,
as insinuated by the name, is that of an English water garden--
tended, but not manicured. This informality is in place both to
reinforce this theme, and to provide a design capable of
weathering periodic inundation by high wintertime water levels.
In the middle of the north shore, an amphitheater is shown. This
will provide a location for outdoor plays, concerts, other
performances, and public events.
k
On the eastern shore of the pond, a "Tea Garden" is indicated.
This includes a tea house and garden area where tea, and other
refreshments can be served. This location could be managed by a
concessionaire for the general public and for holding of special
group meetings or receptions.
The plaza, amphitheater and "Tea Garden" are all facilities that
can be programmed and operated to generate revenue to support the
maintenance and operations of the park.
The "Civic Center Water Garden" is the second distinct area.
This area is at the eastern end of the park, immediately south
and east of the Civic Center. This is a small area of maintained
lawn, trees and water edge perennials and shrub plantings. A
pond is excavated in the location of an existing overflow channel
to create a visual focus for the area and to diversify the area's
natural habitats. A small weir is shown at the downstream edge
of the pond to control summertime water levels. An aeration
spray head and pump may need to be installed in the pond to
improve water quality. In addition to the pond excavation, a
small channel is shown connecting the stream to the backwater
slough adjacent to the Civic Center. This is indicated to help
improve passage for wildlife and to improve the water quality in
the backwater area.
On the edge of the pond, a small arbor and patio are shown. This
arbor and surrounding lawn area will be used for picnic lunches
and small gatherings to complement the plaza areas at the Civic
Center.
North of the Senior Center, an area of existing canary grass is
shown to be mown to create a rough meadow to allow for the
informal play activities of people in the adjacent residential
area.
The rest of the park, comprising the majority of the park area,
is indicated to be a nature preserve. Here natural vegetation
and habitat areas will remain undisturbed or altered to improve
their natural character and ability to support the area's
wildlife inhabitants. This includes preservation of a large
portion of the center portion of the park in an undisturbed
state. On the western end, adjacent to the "Main Street Water
Garden," the blackberries that crowd the Creek edge will be
removed and native trees, shrubs, grasses and herbaceous plants
are called for. This includes a planting of native materials
along the southern edge of the Creek adjacent to the plaza area.
This is needed to assure a continuous corridor of natural
vegetation along the Creek. This is important for the
maintenance of diverse and stable populations of native plants
and other wildlife.
At the eastern end of the park, at Hall Boulevard, an entry plaza
with interpretative and educational displays are indicated. This
{
is indicated, not only to inform visitors about the natural
environs of the park, but also to call the public's attention to
the fact that Fanno Creek is a public park and nature preserve.
II. Fanno Park Master Plan
Cost Estimate
December 16, 1988
A. Asphalt Trail (8 ' wide, 3,270 L.F. ) $ 49,050
B. Bridge Relocation '
7,500
C. General Riparian Planting 11, 000
D. Path Lighting (39 each) 58,500
E. East Entry
1. Plaza Paving (1,250 Sq. Ft. ) 6,250
2. Display Kiosk & Park Sign 8,000
_3. Benches (4) 2,000
4. Trash Receptacles (2) 500
5. Riparian Plantings 5,000
6. Irrigation (15,000 Sq. Ft. ) 10,000
F. Meadow Development 10,000
G. City Hall Water Garden
1. Pond Excavation 15,000
2. Wier 5,000
3. Arbor and Arbor Patio 22,000
4. Planting 22,000
5. Irrigation (33,000 Sq. Ft. ) 11,000
6. Benches (7) 3,500
7. Picnic Tables (7) 3,500
H. Main Street Plaza and Water Garden
1. Plaza
a. Paving (16,800 Sq. Ft. ) 67,200
b. Bollards (8) 3,200
C. Entry Portals (2) 10000
d. Planting 20,000
e. Plaza Creekside Steps and
weirs 48,000
2 . Weirs (2) 10,000
3 . Pond Excavation 85,000
4. Rough Grading 20,000
5. Irrigation 42, 000
6. Planting (Water and Tea Garden)
and Lawns 142, 000
7. Riparian Planting 20,000
8. South Bank Asphalt Trail (81 wide,
1, 020 L.F. ) 15,300
9. Tea House and Courtyard 80,000
10. Amphitheater 35,000
11. Water Jet 4,500
how
CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE
Proj . No. 317005 Page 2
12/15/88 Section 03300
A. Submit a placing schedule, within basic project schedule
specified in Section 01310, before starting placing
operations, with dates, areas, and sequence of proposed
concrete placement.
B. Submit the following in accordance with Section 01300:
1. Delivery Tickets: Furnish copies of delivery tickets
for each load of concrete delivered to the site upon
request. Provide items of information as specified.
2. Product Data: Submit for admixtures, curing compounds,
slab curing-sealer, accessories, and for other items as
requested.
3. Mix Designs: Submit written reports to the Project
Manager of each proposed mix for each strength of
concrete at least 15 days prior to start of work. Do
not begin concrete production until mixes have been
reviewed by the Landscape Architect. Show slump
expected at job site, including tolerances.
C. Sample: Provide a 12" x 12" sample of exposed aggregate
surface finish and joint construction for approval before
proceeding.
1. Project Manager and Landscape Architect will review for
color and texture only.
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2. 1 FORMS:
A. General: Forms shall be of metal or wood, straight, and
suitable for the work involved in cross-section, depth and
strength to resist spring during depositing and
consolidating the concrete.
B. Wood Forms: Should be at least two inches thick, and free
from warp, twist, loose knots, splits or other defects.
C. Approved flexible or curved forms shall be used for radius
forming.
'+rrrw ywrr+`
12. Pump at well 10,000
13 . Asphalt Bicycle Path (north bank
replacement path) 10,000
TOTAL 872000
NOTES:
1. No land acquisition costs have been added into these
figures.
2. Due to the schematic nature of plans, it may be
appropriate to figure contingency costs into the
estimate of the total cost.
�
LIST OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
JANUARY/FEBRUARY MEETING SCHEDULES
'-r-�x
/
City Council 0' 3O � Yn'�t-
.
� r -
Jan [ /
Feb. 1 ,l
Boards and Committees
Parks Dr, Graham 7: 30 p.m.
Res: 039-7385 3rd Tuesday
Bus: 684-8475
Planning Don Moon 1ot Tuesday after 1st
Res: 639-0834 Monday
Bus : 630-3121 Jan. 10' (24)
Ext. 310 Feb. 7, (21)
Transportation Joe 8ohweitz 7:00 p.m.
Res: 630-0226 3r6 Thursday
Bus: 238'4881
Library Vince Matarreue 7:80 P.M.
Res : 630-7530 2nd Wednesday
Utility & Franchise Gary McReynolds 3rd Tuesday
Res: 625-7117
Bus : 245-7651
Budget Judy Christensen 1 meeting in January
Res: 020-8524 (unscheduled)
`
Bus: 260-1126 None in February
Tigard Water District 630-1554 7:80 p.m.
2nd Tuesday
Metzger Water District 245-8831 7:38 p.m.
3rd Thursday
6501 SW Taylors Ferry
NRD'n
1 Emmett Whitaker 7: 30 p.m.
Res: 039-8570 1ot Wednesday
Bus: 275-1059
2 Inactive
3 Bob Bledsoe 7:30 p.m.
Res : 630-8037 2nd Monday
Bus: N/A City Hall
4 Louise Stewart 7: 30 p.m.
Res : 020-2227 1ut Wednesday
Buy : 248-4228 City Hall
�
IN4000
JANUARY/FEBRUARY SCHEDULES
Page 2
NPO'm
5 Craig Hopkins 7:30 p.m.
Rey : 630-5823 3rd Wednesday
Bus : 1-659-8111 City Hall
0 Phillip Pastoris 7: 80 p.m.
Res: 639-0740 3rd Wednesday
Bus : 221-3611 City Hall
7 Nancy Robbins 7:08 p.m.
Ren : 620-4679 3rd Wednesday
City Hall
8 Marjory Haglund 7:20 p.m.
Res: 689-4487 3rd Wednesday
City Hall
Civic Organizations
Senior Center Board Carol Webber 0 a.m.
620-4613 2nd Wednesday
Chamber of Commerce Peggy Noon
639-1656 1ut & 3rd Tuesday
Hi Hat
Tigard Lions Fred Trueax 6: 30 p.m.
639-4529 1ot & 3rd Monday in
January
Carrow' o
11 :4S a.m.
2nd & 4th Wednesday in
February
Carrow` u
Rotary Club Dennis Derbey 0uun
635-5023 Every Thursday
Hi Hat
Summerfield Civic Assn. Charlotte Tice 0:00 a.m.
620-0131 2nd Tuesday
Clubhouse
School Board Russ Juki 7/30 p.m.
620-1020 Jan. 5th
Woodward Elementary
7: 30 p.m.
Feb. 9th
Metzger Elementary
on/8398D
JANUARY 1989
SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNE.SOAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY
Noon Rotary
1 2. 3 4 5 1 6 7
6:30F>M LionsNoon Chamber Noon Rotary
7:30PM NPO 1 & 7: 30PM School
NPO 4 Board
8 9 10 1.1 12 13 14
9:OOAM Summer— 9:OOAM Senior
6: 30F>M Councilfield Board Noon Rotary
7:00PM Planning 7:OOPM Library
7: 30PM NPO 3 7:30PM T. Water
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
6: 30PM Council Noon Chamber Noon Rotary
6: 30PM Lions 7:00PM Utility 7:OOF>M NPO 7 7:00PM Trans .
7:30PM Party 7:30PM NPO 5, 6
7:30PM M. Water & 8
2.2 23 242ri 26 27 28
Noon Rotary
6: 30PP'i Council
7:00PM Planning
29 30 31
ke/32DD
FEBRUARY 1989
SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY
1 2 3 4
Noon Rotary
7: 30PM NPO 1 &
NPO 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
9:OOAM Senior
Noon Chamber Board Noon Rotary
11:45AM Lions
7: 30PM School
7:OOPM Planning 7:OOPM Library Board
12. 13 14 15 16 17 18
9:OOAM Summer—
field Noon Rotary
6:30PM Council 7:OOPM NPU 7
7:OOPM Utility 7:30PM NPO 5, 6 7:OOPM Trans .
7: 30PM NPO 3 7:30PM T. Water & 8
19 2.0 21 ?..2 2.3 24 25
6: 30PM Council Noon Chamber 11:45AM Lions Noon Rotary
7:OOPM Planning
7: 30PM Parks 7:30PM M. Water
26 2.7 7..8
6:30PM Council
ke/32DD
7 BE "m6
NPO BOUNDARY 1=22ma _ Nil
CITY LIMITS
law _ • ��
all -
zm 0
allNPO WALNUTST
Lowas
o
�►� �mm
off
• i�� �� ", Iii/1
�•�lop • ,
44 r
'� . tT 17^^r' - !'. r.m.. .. .� • ra.._
i
ri
00
o ' FIV
• FANNO CREEK PARK a .
MASTER PLAN urr C n<.• co a
r ��