Report (35) rYt 57-;L C> 0 CU 5' 2 eZ
'I III
FIRE F T t SMEMS
4
� IC
I
11�
t`
AQUAS FEE FLOW TIES'
r v IFKA'TION
k
VaSME low Test Verification
xln.+2a,f.xxxt, ....... .k .
�e � � s�rcttks ..
tt1; Eons.�t® s
Comparsy Name;
to ow ufww fte Soft:
[w"Am15cinnest
Phone, ta '- TectSWAM at
r9ftB.594t 7'726 ter
Fax Color of test tsrifce used:
lrsb dame: }��/�,r�t"� �..
Pr of lvw*er: _rt Ovate uv*rhttn t e(000 RVMM*t at intuits
�. resff:,—
" 1 Residual arm(jlm ng)re lig at incomWater
pity into home of at Warn sh
State,ZtP:
Mat time of day Awas the flow t*en7
For de-signs not provided by Uponor,complete the Flow test method used? C3 ter meterfoli�g;inf rr.
DesiqWs Name. Flow test qpm:
Compatry; �Mo t How many gallons of water did a design predict
as required?
Qid the test meat ora treed d flow? d Yes Q No
Fes` Which sprinkler did you flow?
bec
�e taming sign permacemtly a ached dose to the t ocaesf hei
' IY" shutoff valvd? i-I Yes loo
�,r' Elate left in service vAh A vat+' open;
Was this system required by Lode?tC�Yes l�No
NW* Ot n
4,117
e
A"ftW motions assd NoW
t*ww. Tel 8W321,47-"
M VIM%eet%k Fax:.852.991.5731
Ap*V f,MN 55124 LIAS IN&lam ulm