Loading...
06/22/1976 - Minutes MINUTES Tigard Site Development Plan AND Architectual Design Review Board June 22, 1976 - 5:00 p.m. General Telephone Building 12460 SW Main Street - Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER: Meeting was called to order at 5:15 pm by Chairman McMlonagle. 2. ROLL CALL: Present Hammes, McMonagle, Olson, Cook. Absent: Goldbach. Staff present: Daniels, Bolen. 3. MINUTES: Cook moved and Olson seconded that the minutes of May 25, 1976, be approved as submitted. The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. 4. COMMUNICATIONS: Daniels presented a letter from Mr. Joe Gerber of Gerber Legendary Blades complimenting the DRB on their actions in regard to their review of the Gerber plant expansion on 72nd. 5. DESIGN REVIEW 5.1 SDR 20-76 (Day Care Center) A request by Roberta O'Donahoe .for design review for a proposed children's day care center at 7310 SW Spruce St. NOW A. Site Development Plan Review 1. Staff Report: read by Daniels. B. The staff recommendations: The staff recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. A waiver of non remonstrance agreeing to participate in local improvement district for Sb'{vT Spruce be filed tititith the City Recorder. 2. Concrete aprons to be constructed at grade with future street improvement and approved by Washington County Public .,Torks. 3. Parking stalls be minimum 916" in width. 4. Minimum 5' back out space for the southern most parking stall be provided and proposed tree locations be appropriately modified. 5. The entrance/delivery area to be expanded. AW 6. Appropriate ground cover and evergreen bushes or trees be located around the parking area. Page 2 Minutes DRI-3 June 22, 1976 7. A wall mounted sign not to exceed 12 square feet be permitted as the only sign on the site. 5. ',jest perimeter of the parking area to be expanded 2' to include three additional pin oak and inter- spersed with evergreen bushes or trees. In addition some evergreens could be placed along the play- ground fence on the east side of the parking lot. C. Applicant's Presentation Ms. Roberta O'Donahoe, applicant, summarized the pro- ject and stated her agreement with the staff recommenda- tion. Olson inquired as to the adquency of a 15' wide two way driveway. Staff responded that due to the short length of the driveway and the number of spaces it serves the 15 ' width would be adquant, and that the addition of landscaping would be more beneficial. D. Board Discussion and Action Cook moved and Olson seconded that the site plan be approved with the conditions as presented by Staff. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. 5.2 SDR 21-76 (Young's Funeral Home) A request by Young's Funeral Home for design review for proposed exterior remodeling of a funeral home at 11531 S?,r Pacific Hwy. A. Site Development Plan Review 1. Staff report: read by Daniels 2. Staff recommendation: Staff recommended approval of the site plan with the following conditions: 1. All parking spaces be 9'6" by 191 . 2. 6" wheel blocks be provided for the eastern most parking space and those nearest the existing buildings. 3. The 3' by 3' planning areas in the central parking area be curbed and hardy deciduous AW trees, such as Norway Maple, of minimum 2" caliber with appropriate ground cover be planted. Page 3 z Minutes DRB June 22, 1976 4. Information regarding the direction of light. beams near the sign be submitted to the staff. B. Applicant's Presentation Mr. Clive Kienle, architect for the applicant summarized the project. Mr. Young, operator of the funeral home, stated that the parking lot as it presently exists functions well and that a parking lot for funeral homes is different than that of a shopping center in that it is a very controlled situation and asked that the parking areas be allowed to remain. in the way it presently exists. C. Board Discussion Action McMonagle stated that it appeared that wheel blocks are necessary for those parking stalls near the building. Hammes moved and Cook seconded to approve the site plan with the following conditions: 1. 6" wheel blocks be provided for the parking spaces nearest the building. 2. 3' by 3' planting areas be curbed and planted with a hardy deciduous tree and appropriate ground cover. 3. The sign lighting be located so as not to create a traffic hazard along Pacific Hwy. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. D. Architectual Design Review 1. Applicant's Presentation Mr. Kienle described the building materials and colors and stated that the work to be done was only on the front porton and not on the side facing Warner St. Cook moved and Hammes ^nconded for approval of the architectual design as presented. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. 5.3 REVIF`r ZC 4-73 (Farmer's Ins uranc e) Review of a proposed silting program for Farmer's Insurance ' at Interstate 5 and highway 217. A. Staff report: read by Daniels B. Staff recommendation: staff recommends that the Page 4 Minutes DRB June 22, 1976 signing program be approved as submitted as it is in compliance with the general and program approved on September 9, 1974. C. Applicant's Presentation Bill Finley, representing Bryon Ferris Design, agents for Farmer's Insurance group, presented the material and showed pictures of the sign and described the rationale for this particular sign and exhibited a map showing the proposed locations for the sign. Olson inquired as to the length of time the leasing sign would remain on the main sign. Finley, responsed that the sign would be removed upon leasing of the entire park and that the parent sign would be restained. D. Board Discussion Action Olson moved and Cook seconded to approve the planning program as submitted with a modification that the leasing sign be reduced in width so as to provide a 6" border, along the sides of sign. The motion was approved by a unanimous voice vote. 6. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Larry Bissett, resident, approached the board and encouraged the board to be stricter in their design review in that many times it assists those developers interested in doing a good job and will result in a more liveable environment in Tigard. Chairman Mcl,onagle asked if signs were under review of the Design Review Board. Daniels stated that Section 18.58.030 of Tigard Municipal Code requires applicants to submit a site plan showing a location of signs and in that signs are a part of the site's architect would fall under their review. Bolen explained the history of the ordinance creating the DRB and that review of signs was a point of contention during that discussion and most of the language considering signing was removed, but Staff would inquire from the City Attorney whether signs were subject to DRB. 7. ADJOURN1,1ENT: There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m.