Loading...
06/22/1976 - Packet AGENDA TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN & ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JUNE 22, 1976 - 5:00 P.M. GENERAL TELEPHONE BUILDING 12460 S.W. MAIN STREET, TIGARD, OREGON. 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: 3. MINUTES OF MAY 25, 1976: 4. COMMUNICATIONS: 5. DESIGN REVIEW: 5.1 SDR 20-76 (Day Care Center) A request by Roberta O'Donahue for design review of a proposed childrens day care center at 7310 S.W. Spruce Street. A. Site Development Plan Review 5.2 SDR 21-76 (Young's Funeral Home) A request by Young's Funeral Home for design review of a proposed exterior remodeling of a funderal home at 11831 SW Pacific Highway. fir+ A. Site. Development Plan Review B. Architectural Design Review 5.5 ZC 4-73 (Farmer's Ins.) Review of a proposed signing program for Farmer's Insurance at Interstate-5 and Highway 217. 6. OTHER BuSINESS 7. ADJOURNMENT STAFF REPORT Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board June 22, 1976 Agenda 5.1 Docket: SDR 20-76 Request: Site Development Plan Review of a Proposed Childrens Day Care Center Location: 7310 S. W. Spruce Street Applicant: Roberta O'Donahue BASIC FACTS• 1. The site is designated "Urban Low Density Residential" on the Tigard Community Plan and zoned 11R-7 Single Family Residential" . 2. A Conditional Use Permit (CU 6-76) for a Day Care Center was approved by the Planning Commission on February 17, 1976, with the following conditions: A. Site Development Plan be subject to Design Review Board Approval. B. A waiver of remonstrance, agreeing to participate in a Local Improvement District for S. W. Spruce Street be filed with the City Recorder. 3. The surrounding land use consists of the Fred Meyer store and parking lot to the south and east with single family residences across Spruce Street and a vacant lot to the west. An insurance agency is located in a house at the N.E. corner of 72nd and S. W. Spruce Street. 4. S. W. Spruce Street is an unimproved street with a 80' right-of- way. Recently an 80+ unit apartment building was given Design Review Approval by Washington County at S. W. 78th and S. W. Spruce. A condition of that approval was for improvement of S. W. Spruce from S. W. 78th to S. W. 72nd Avenue. A street improvement consent covenant has recently been mailed to the applicant and must be satisfied prior to issuance of occupancy permit. FINDINGS: 1. The Site Plan shows six 9 ' x 20 ' parking stalls whereas the code requires a minimum of 91 .6" width. 2. No 10 ' backout space is provided for the southernmost (top of drawing) parking space. Staff Report SDP & ADRB Page 2 3. The number of spaces appears adequate especially with provision for the through drive for pickup and delivery. 4. The driveway for pickup and delivery is about 10' wide. Concern does arise about the negotiability of entering that drive from the street. 5. Barkdust only is shown for the 2' strip along the parking area away from the play area. These areas have a tendency for neg- lect and the addition of ground lessens that appearance. Also, no groundcover is shown for the remainder of the parking area perimeter. 6. The play area is well contained with a fence and concrete wall. 7. No information was submitted for either the play area surface or play equipment. 8. No provision was made for allowing a sign during the Conditional Use process and advertising signs are prohibited in the R-7 zone. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. A waiver of remonstrance agreeing to participate in a Local Improvement District for S. W. Spruce Street be filed with the City Recorder. 2. Concrete aprons to be constructed at grade with future street improvement and approved by Washington County Public Works. 3. Parking stalls be a minimum 91641 in width. 4. Minimum 54 backout space for the southernmost parking stall be provided and proposed tree locations to be appropriately modified. 5. The entrance area to the pickup/delivery area be expanded. 6. Appropriate ground cover and evergreen bushes or trees be located around the parking area. 7. A wall-mounted sign not to exceed 12' be permitted as the only sign on the site. Staff Report SDP & ADRB Page 3 S. West perimeter of parking area to be expanded 2 feet and to include 3 additional pin oak and interspersed by evergreen bushes or trees. In addition, some evergreens could be placed along the playground fence on the east side of the parking lot. STAFF REPORT Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board June 22, 1976 Agenda 5.2 Docket: SDR 21-76 Request: Design Review of an Exterior Remodeling of an Existing Commercial Building and Location of a New Sign Location: 11831 S. W. Pacific Highway Applicant: Young's Funeral Home BASIC FACTS: 1. The site is designated as "Retail Commercial" on the Neighborhood Plan II and zoned "C-3, General Commercial". FINDINGS: 1. The applicant's proposal envision no floor area expansion. 2. Section 18.60.120 (4)(i) of the Tigard Municipal Code requires one parking space for each 8' of bench length in the chapel. The floor plan shows 187' of bench space thus requiring 23 spaces at this site. The Site Plan shows 32, but some are under- sized and some are poorly located. The spaces closest to the "existing building" are approximately 9' x 17' whereas the Tigard Municipal Code requires 9'6" x 191 . The Code also requires AW a 24' drive/backout for 90 degree parking stalls. 3. The Tigard Municipal Code requires 6" wheel blocks on all exterior parking stalls. These are necessary for the stalls nearest the "existing building" and the easternmost stall near S. W. Pacific Highway. 4. The Site Plan shows three 3' x 3 ' areas for tree planting in the central parking area. This satisfies the requirement for land- scaping 70' on center, but without curbed protection, there is potential for damage. 5. No landscaping plan was submitted, but the site presently has extensive landscaping. No specific tree type is proposed. A hardy deciduous such as Norway maple would enhance the site. 6. A new 13'6" x 7' redwood sign with inset letters is proposed to be mounted on a 6 x 6 and four 2 x 4 post combination, three feet from the right-of-way. Although height of the sign is appropri- ate, the length (13 '611) appears excessive. 7. The Site Plan proposes u. o 300 watt flood lights near the sign. Care should be taken not to allow them to be directed toward Pacific Highway. Staff Report SDP & ADRB Page 2 STAFF RECODSIENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Site Plan with the following conditions: 1. All parking spaces be 9161, x 191 . 2. Six-inch wheel blocks be provided for the easternmost park- ing space and those nearest the "existing building". 3. The 3' x 31 planting areas in the central parking area be curbed and deciduous trees, i.e. Norway maple, of minimum 2" caliper with appropriate groundcover be planted. 4. Information regarding the direction of light beams near the sign be submitted to Staff. STAFF REPORT Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design ReviewBoard June 22, 1976 Agenda 5.5 Docket: ZC LE-73 Request: Review of Signing Program Location: Triangle Park at Htiry 217, I-5 and S.11,T. 60th Parkway Applicant: Farmers ' Insurance BASIC FACTS: 1. The site is designated "Residential Commercial" on the Tigard Community Plan and zoned "C-P, Commercial Professional-Planned Development". 2. The CP-PD zone was approved September 9, 1974. 3. Section 18.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code states: "Signs in a planned development district (under pro- visions of Chapter 18.56) for the specific purpose of site identification, building identification, tenant identification and traffic direction may be permitted in such planned development district as approved in the general plan (Section 13.56.030) subject to design review board approval, providing that an integrated sign theme is carried out compatible with the overall development and consistent with the approved General Plan and Program. " 4. The approved General Plan and Program refers to the Signing Program in the following manner: "Lighting, signing, bus stops, seating areas, pedestrian walks, bridges, etc. , will be designed to complement the natural wooded setting and office campus atmosphere" (page 6) . 5. Once Design. Review Board approval is acquired, the General Plan. and Program will be amended by the Planning Commission and City Council. CONCLUSIONARY FINDING and RECO17ENDATION: Staff finds that the Signing Program is in compliance with the General Plan and Program as approved in that it is compatible with the site and recommends approval as submitted. w..