11/09/1976 - Packet Ti3ord. Site Ze7elppwnt nnO !rcKitPctwrQ VesiEn V , pv Pcn-�-'
7o77cmber 9 , 1976 — 5: 00 7Y
Gencrs! Telcybrne 3010n-
C'
12AGr 7 4 Main 2t. , Tigard , Crpgnn
1. 7ALI TC ORDER -
2.
I e�T ' 1 77
T- C''?
5.
A request for arrhitcrtu7p! Lesign 7c0ow -f Ev7,linc
rumps st 11440 S.W. "wrific NEhamy .
5 , 2 UP 59-76 Dchn A . lvewcr�
& rpquest "or site devrippmont plzn Fnd FrcONctur-7
lesign Yeview r P 70-Unit Orprtmcri rov-Try Or,
1 c7errje 7t .
5. 7 717 40-76 (AcbPrt Ron&-K CW
A request fcr P File OvelopTent pinn and P-chite2turp7-
LeFign 2eview of a 57 wit ppartment Vin_ low vn 7
OVOTIP Ferry 7and pne 121 -t .
V . 0 CDP 41-76 (Art latF)
A requrst r,Y, orrhitectural lecl,n 7ev'nw of P bus
sheltnr or 7.T. 9pringwoce Irl-n .
5 . 5 7UP 75-76 (jerry Net - 7Qn 7-pft)
P requect for review of a p-cpcsef frce rtpndinE rf�n fcr
Villa, SqYare ShoppirS Qntpr.
'17
STAFF REPORT
Agenda 5 . 1
Site Development and Architectural Design Review Board
October 26, 1976 - 7:00 P.M.
12460 S .W. Main St . - Tigard, Oregon
DOCKET: SDR 37-76
REQUEST: To add a canopy over existing gasoline pumps .
LOCATION: 11440 S .W. Pacific Highway - Jerry ' s Mobil
APPLICANT: Mobil Oil Corporation
I . BASIC FACTS :
1 . The site is designated "General Commercial" on the Tigard
Community Plan and zoned "C-3 General Commercial" which
allows gas stations as a conditional use .
II . FINDINGS :
1 . The applicant is requesting review of a proposal to add
a 14 ' high, circular canopy to both existing islands at
a Mobil gas station at 11440 S .W. Pacific Highway similar
to those at the Mobil station on S .W . Greenburg Road near
Shady Lane.
44W 2. The size , shape and proposed location does not violate
provisions of Title 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code .
3. On site inspection on September 20, 1976 discovered the
following sign code violations:
2 - temporary mini-service signs
3 - 4 x 4 temporary signs
4 . Outside storage of tires in violation of Section 18 .12 . 080
of the Tigard Municipal Code was also discovered.
III . STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the request as submitted on the
condition that all noted code violations be rectified and a
landscape plan be developed for the area between the curb
and the property line .
r
STAFF REPORT
Agenda 5 .2
Tigard Site Development and Architectural Site Design Review
November 9, 1976
General Telephone Building
12460 S .W. Main St . - Tigard, Oregon
DOCKET : SDR 39-76
REQUEST: Site Development Plan and Architectural Design Review of
a 10 unit townhouse apartment complex.
LOCATION: S .W. McKenzie Street , west of S .W. Pacific Highway
(Wash. Co . Tax Map 2S1 2BD, Tax Lot 700)
APPLICANT: John A. Loewer
I . BASIC FACTS
1 . The site is designated "Urban Medium Density Residential"
on the Neighborhood Plan II and zoned "A-2 Multi-Family
Residential" .
2 . S .W. McKenzie is designated a local street on the Neighbor-
hood Plan II requiring a 50 ' right-of-way.
II . FINDINGS
1 . The submission lacks topography plant specifications,
lighting and trash recepticals as required.
2. The applicant is requesting review of a 10 apartment units
in two buildings on a .83 acre site on McKenzie Street .
3 . The site is presently a horse pasture sloping away from
S .W. McKenzie Street .
4 . The surrounding land use is a church on the west , a single
story apartment complex on the south and Copeland Lumber
Company on the east .
5 . S .W. McKenzie is a substandard one way (west) street
constricted due to parking for the restaurant at the corner
of S .W. Pacific Highway and McKenzie Street .
6 . The Tigard Municipal Code requires parking spaces to be
within 50 ' of the units . The site plan is deficient . The
parking area should be placed where the large grass area . is .
This would also mean the loss of one less existing Filbert
tree .
7. The back yards of the fourplex as proposed would abut the
lumber storage yard. This would not provide a very liveable
environment for those units.
Aw 8. Lily of the Valley are not appropriate for this site due to
climate and maintenance requirements and should be replaced.
STAFF REPORT
Agenda 5 . 2
Tigard Design Review
November 9, 1976
Page 2
9. No screening is shown for the single family house to remain .
10 . The site plan shows 9 ' wide parking stalls whereas 916"
are required.
11 . No specifications are shown for the parking lot .
12. Inadequate screening is being provided between this site
and the lumber yard.
13. Arborvitae needs to be 4 ' - 5 ' on center to provide effective
screening.
14 . The building locations should be rearranged to take into
account the change in parking lot location .
15 . S .W. McKenzie Street is 40 ' right-of-way thus requiring 5 '
dedication on this side in order to bring it up to code .
16. S .W. McKenzie is in a substandard condition and in need
of improvement .
17. Without topography it is impossible to determine if the
proposed drainage system is adequate .
III . STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The submitted site plan be denied and resubmitted; relocating
the building and parking locations, providing better screening,
and satisfying the code noted deficiencies.
STAFF REPORT
Agenda 5. 3
Tigard Site Development and Architectural Design Review Board
November 9, 1976 - 5 : 00 P.M.
General Telephone Building
12460 S .W . Main St. - Tigard, Oregon
DOCKET: SDR 40-76
REQUEST: Review of a site development plan and architectural design
of a 53 unit apartment complex.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S .W. 121st Avenue and S .W. Scholls
Ferry Road (Wash . Co . Tax Map 1S1 34AB, Tax Lot 100) .
APPLICANT: The Robert Randall Company
I . BASIC FACTS
1 . The site is a portion of the Englewood Planned Development
approved July 9, 1973 with among other conditions
3 . That site development plans and architectural design
of the multi-family dwellings shall be subject to
approval of the Planning Commission prior to issuance
of building permits, to insure compatability with the
single family neighborhood.
`lft+ 4 . That a landscaped earth berm be installed along S .W.
121st Avenue and Scholls Ferry Road to help provide
privacy for dwellings adjoining said streets .
10. The applicant shall provide a minimum six foot meander-
ing landscaped pedestrian/bikeway along and separated
from the paved portion of S .W. Scholls Ferry Road.
11 . That the areas designated for apartment development be
limited to 11 units/gross acre .
2 . The site is within the Englewood II subdivision plat .
Applicable conditions to that approval was,
7. "Access to the multi-family tract may not be within
100 ' of Scholls Ferry Road and S .W. 121st Avenue . "
II . FINDINGS
1 . The applicant is requesting architectural design and site
development plan review of a 53 unit apartment complex as
a part of the Englewood Planned Development .
2. The site is 4 .9 acres and slopes from S .W . 121st Avenue to
the east with a 40 ' difference in elevation. The site has
been stripped of vegetation .
`�wr
3. There are 11 single f:amily . lots adjacent- to this site .
STAFF REPORT
Agenda 5. 3
Design Review Board
Page 2
4 . A neighborhood commercial planned development has been
approved to the west across S .W. 121st Avenue . The area
across S .W. Scholls Ferry is in Beaverton and presently
undeveloped but designated low density residential .
5. S .W. Scholls Ferry Road is a state highway that is under-
going transition from a rural market road into an urban
arterial . It is absent of street lighting.
6 . Participationinthe costs of providing a traffic signal
at the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road and S .W. 121st
was required by the City Council in approving the neighbor-
hood shopping center. This development will contribute
substantially to the traffic problem and need for the
signalization therefore should also be partially responsible
for the cost of the signal .
7. The access point for the neighborhood commercial shopping
center is 200 ' from the Scholls Ferry Road intersection .
The proposed access point for this development is approxi-
mately 95' from the property line along Scholls Ferry Road.
The center lines of these two drives should match up .
8. The Tigard Community Plan, 1971 , includes as a policy that
arterials streets will give limited access to adjoining
property. The proposed access point onto Scholls Ferry Rd.
will probably serve as the primary access to over 2 of the
project and will result in left turn movements from a
narrow two lane road. The provision of an access point
onto Scholls Ferry Road at this time is premature and should
be prohibited until such time as Scholls Ferry Road is improved
to arterial standards with a left turn refuge .
9. Section 18. 58 .040 (3) of the Tigard Municipal Code requires
landscape islands 70 ' on center. The site plan is deficient
in 3 of the four parking areas.
10 . Section 18 .64. 020 (b) of the Tigard Municipal Code states ,
that "vehicular access and egress for multi-family residen-
tial uses shall not be less than the following, 50 - 100
dwelling units with 1 access point 50 ' access point with
36 ' pavement width with curbs. The Director of Public Works
has stated a need to provide a standard city driveway apron
and street opening.
11 . Section 18. 60. 120 requires 1 . 5 parking spaces/dwelling unit
in apartment complexes. The site plan shows 84 spaces
whereas 80 are required.
12. Section 18 .60 .160 requires that parking spaces be a minimum
of 916" x 19 . The 9 ' wide parking stalls as shown on the
site plan are inadequate .
STAFF REPORT
Agenda 5 . 3
Design Review Board
Page 3
13. The proposed site plan shows a meandering 6 ' wide bicycle/
pedestrian path as required by the Planned Development
ordinance. This should extend to and connect to the
existing path in the greenway . Only one connection to
the path is shown . Additional connections along the
path should be made .
14 . The pedestrian circulation appears to be inadequate .
Additional pathway along the western and southern peri-
meter of the site would resolve that problem.
15 . The proposed site plan envisions a swimming pool and sun
deck to satisfy the recreational needs of the residents
of the 53 units with two to three people/unit an estimated
number . 100 - 150 people can be expected to reside in
this development . Yet the only recreational opportunities
offered is a motel sized pool (approximately 675 sq. ft) .
No areas for unsupervised childrens activity is provided.
The addition of a tennis court , a combination basketball/
volleyball court , and a children ' s play area would provide
the needed recreational opportunities for residents of all
ages and greatly enhance the project thus reducing the
transiency exhibited by most multi-family projects .
16. An additional catch basin is needed in the western parking
area.
17. A landscape plan at 1" - 50 ' is too vague to determine if
the plantings around the buildings are adequate .
18. The method of providing irrigation is not specified enough
to determine if adequate .
19 . Two story multi-family units is not compatable with single
family residences.
III . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS :
Staff recommends denial based on the following :
1 . The type of structure is not compatable with the single
family units to the south.
2 . Numerous code deficiencies as noted in the staff findings
are shown on the site plan .
3 . The landscape plan is at too large of a scale to assess
the adequacy of plant materials .
t,ilaw,,