Loading...
11/23/1976 - Minutes MINUTES TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 30 , 1976 - 5 :00 P.M. General Telephone 12460 S .W. Main - Tigard, Oregon 1 . CALL TO ORDER : Meeting was called to order at 5 : 15 by Chairman McMonagle. 2 . ROLL CALL : Present : Hammes, McMonagle, Cook, Goldbach and Olson . Staff Present : Daniels and Edwards 3 . MINUTES : Cook asked that the Board delay approving the minutes until the end of the meeting. 4 . COMMUNICATIONS : None 5 . DESIGN REVIEW: 5 . 1 SDR 38-76 Wayside Inn Review of a proposed four story, 120 unit motel on S .W. Pacific Highway, north of S .W. 69th Avenue . SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW A. Staff Report : Read by Daniels . B . Staff Recommendation : Staff recommends that this site plan be denied and any resubmission include the following changes : 1 . Orient the building away from Pacific Highway by rotating. 2. Incorporate the Planning Commission conditions into the site plan or provide the Design Review Board with the method for achieving compliance. 3 . Provide a turning radius adequate for vehicles in the canopy area to return to the central parking lot . 4 . Develop a signing program which assures that primary access is gained via S .W. 69th Avenue not S .W. Pacific Highway . 5 . Develop a landscaping plan which softens the impact of the additional building height , screens the Portland General Electric substation , includes all of the site and includes an automatic irrigation system to provide for adequate maintenance . C. Applicant ' s Presentation : o Tom McDonald, project manager - discussed the economic aspects of the project , i .e . Pacific Highway orientation MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 30, 1976 Page 2 k� - conceded that the project ' s grading had been done at their own risk but that they should have been informed of the possibility that the building might be changed, - suggested a compromise of an additional canopy on the south side of the building with signing designating it the main entrance , - proposed posting a bond for the extension of S .W. 69th until such a time as the street alignment is determined, discussed different possibilities for the areas labeled "future building" (motel , office complex) . D . Board Discussion : o Board discussed traffic circulation on the site . o McMonagle asked that the applicant present a detail of the proposed traffic island per Highway Division request . A,w o McMonagle and Cook criticized the compatability of :the building in relationship to its site . o McDonald stated that by having four stories they were conserving land plus allowing for the number of units needed economically. o Board discussion on the continuance of S .W. 69th Avenue , general consensus was that the parking lot should connect with S .W. 69th Avenue and that the remaining portion of the street could be developed at a later time . o McMonagle itemized the points agreed upon - S .W . 69th Avenue continuing to connect with the Wayside Inn parking lot , - a convenient turn radius be planned in front of the canopy (shifting parking stalls if necessary) , - details of the traffic island and signing be submitted, - no parking be allowed on S .W. 69th Avenue, 4'w - light in the intersection of S .W. 69th Avenue and S .W. Pacific Highway was a necessity . o Discussion on different means of financing the light . McDonald asked that the City Council determine what Mr . Lee ' s fair share would be . MINUTES . TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 30, 1976 Page 3 Cook moved for denial of the proposal , no second was given . o Discussion on building orientation and landscape plan deficiencies . Staff contended that the east portion of the lot was inadequately screened, landscaped beds were too small and under planted, no irrigation plan was presented and no landscaping was shown for future building area. Goldbach moved and Cook seconded that the proposal be denied without prejudice and be resubmitted with the fee waived on December 14 with staff helping on any revisions . The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote . o McDonald asked that the Board give some indication as to whether the building design was acceptable so that construction of pre-cast panels could pro- ceed. o Board agreed to a preliminary review of the architecture . o Cook objected to the mansard roof and asked that the building be architecturally compatible to Coco 's and Plankhouse . Olson moved and Hammes seconded that the Board indicate that the building was acceptable . Olson asked that the motion be rescinded and restated as follows : Olson moved and Hammes seconded to indicate to the applicant that the Board reaction to the precast con- crete panels was favorable. The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote . 5 .2 SDR 42-76 Safeguard-Partex Review of a loading dock , ramp, and fencing to an industrial site on S .W. Hunziker Street east of S .W . Hall Blvd. A. Staff Report : read by Daniels B. Staff Recommendation : Staff recommends approval as submitted with the addition of landscaping adequate to minimize the visual impact of the screen fencing. C. Applicant ' s Presentation : MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 30, 1976 Page 4 low o Applicant presented pictures of the proposed fence and stated that he had no objection to landscaping in front of the fence . D. Board Discussion : Goldbach moved and Hammes seconded for approval with the condition that landscape details be worked out with staff . The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote . ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW o Applicant stated that the loading dock would be cement with a broom finish on the ramp . Cook moved and Olson seconded to approve the architecture as submitted. The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote . 5. 3 SDR 43-76 Davies Office Building Review of a proposed office building on S .W. Pacific Highway, south of S .W. McDonald Street . A . Staff Report : Read by Daniels B. Staff Recommendations : Staff recommends approval as submitted . C. Applicant 's Presentation : o Art Middleton, architect , presented the site plan to the Board. o Darrel May, landscape architect , presented the landscape plan and stated that an automatic irriga- tion system would be provided. o Middleton stated that all air conditioning units would be concealed. Olson moved and Goldbach seconded that the proposal be approved as submitted. The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW o Middleton stated that the building would be 76 ' x 621 , the material would be stained horizontal cedar siding, and marble trete . MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 30, 1976 Page 5 Cook moved and Olson seconded to approve architectural plans as submitted. The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote . SIGN REVIEW o Middleton presented a wall and freestanding sign details - freestanding sign location was ascertained on the site plan . Cook moved and Hammes seconded to approve the signs as submitted. The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote . 6. OTHER BUSINESS o Goldbach moved and Cook seconded to approve the minutes of November 9 , 1976 as submitted. o Staff presented the Art Lutz bus shelter with the applicant ' s request that Design Review Board reconsider the proposal based on the following information : - shelter would be 8 ' from the sidewalk, - windows were not necessary since the opening was oriented on a curve , - louvered vents would be provided. Hammes moved and Olson seconded to approve the bus shelter pro- viding it meets the building code . o Staff and Board discussed whether administrative actions pre- determined Design Review Board decisions . 7. ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 8 :45.