Loading...
12/14/1976 - Minutes MINUTES TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 - 5 : 00 P.M. 9040 S .W. Burnham - Tigard, Oregon 1 . CALL TO ORDER: Meeting was called to order at 5 : 15 by Chairman McMonagle . 2 . ROLL CALL: Present : Hammes, Cook, Goldbach , Olson and McMonagle . Staff Present : Daniels, Edwards 3. MINUTES : Olson moved and Goldbach seconded to approve the minutes of November 2 , 1976 . The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote . 4 . COMMUNICATIONS : None 5 . DESIGN REVIEW: 5. 1 SDR 1-76 (Tigard Medical Clinic) Amendment to the Architectural Design of the Tigard Medical Clinic to allow a 3 ' x 30 ' wall sign on the west building face. A. Staff Report : Read by Edwards . B . Staff Recommendation : Staff recommended that the "Hallmark Gift Shop" , and the reader board be deleted from the sign . o Dick Bolen, Planning Director, informed the Board that the approved conditional use permit was for a pharmacy not for a gift store and to use it as such would be a zoning violation and in conflict with the Tigard Community Plan . C. Applicant 's Presentation : Bob Pershing, Oregon Sign Company, presented the sign, and stated the economic need for a reader board. o Goldbach moved and Cook seconded to deny the proposal until staff could review the Planning Commission minutes for possible violation of the conditional use . The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. 5 . 2 SDR 39-76 (Loewer) Review of a proposed 10 unit apartment complex on S .W. McKenzie Street . A. Staff Report : Read by Daniels . MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14 , 1976 Page 2 o Olson informed the Board that because of a possible conflict of interest she would abstain from the review. B . Staff Recommendation : Approval as submitted with the exception that the parking lot be improved to City standards , the Sugar Maple be 8-10 ' (12" caliper) and 2 ,000 sq. ft . of recreation area to be provided. o McMonagle asked that the recreation area be defined. C. Applicant 's Presentation : o John Loewer, applicant , stated that swing set , sandbox and picnic benches would be provided. Hammes moved and Goldbach seconded to approve the proposal with the staff recommendations and adding that the recreation area be subject to staff approval . ` The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote with Olson abstaining. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW: o Loewer presented the architectural plans and stated that : - the washroom would be deleted - units would be colonial blue trimed with white . o Cook asked that the carports be of a similar motif . o Loewer agreed to screen the carports with horizontal siding. o Cook moved and Hammes seconded to approve the archi- tectural plans with the condition that the covered parking be closed in on three sides with material and color matching the building and roof being similar in material and pitch . The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote . 5 . 3 SDR 46-76 (Dickinson) ,1 Review of a proposed 20, 000 sq . ft . warehouse/office at 7325 S .W . Bonita Road. MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 Page 3 A. Staff Report : Read by Daniels . B. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions : 1 . City Engineering Department recommends that : "The curb cuts be to City standards, i .e . 30 ' curb cut with 30 ' between curb cuts . " This can be achieved by closing the middle cut and com- bining the new one with the existing one . 2 . That before building permit be issued the follow- ing items be done : a. That 10' be dedicated on S .W. Bonita Road and 20 ' on S .W. 72nd. b . That a non-remonstrance agreement for a local improvement district on S .W. Bonita and S .W. 72nd be recorded. ' C . That the applicant acquire a street opening permit from the County for S .W. Bonita Road . 3. That the parking lot be improved to City standards . 4 . That a backout area be provided for the rear parking area . 5 . Wheelblocks be provided for the parking spaces facing each other in the rear parking lot , and those spaces abutting the fence . LANDSCAPE RECOMMENDATIONS : 6 . Landscape islands be placed 70 ' on center within the parking areas . 7. Landscape bed in front of the existing warehouse be enlarged to 20 ' with shrub and tree plantings . 8 . Evergreen trees be planted on the west side of the existing building. 9 . A revised landscape plan including specifications and irrigation plan be submitted for the entire site . C. Applicant ' s Presentation: o Bill Wong, architect , objected to improving the MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 Page 4 whole site and asked that only the new warehouse be considered. o Staff responded that the site is part of one tax lot incorporating the existing buildings and extending to S .W. 72nd Avenue. o Cook expressed concern over the amount of paving without a drainage system on the site and asked that the applicant clearly delineate the paved area . o Applicant stated the need for retaining the center curb cut and informed the Board that parking might be put along the front of the existing building. o Goldbach stated that too many changes to the site plan are being proposed, too many deficiencies are involved in the site plan and the applicant might wish to apply for a variance to the parking and curb cut requirements . Goldbach moved and Olson seconded for denial without prejudice and asked that the applicant resubmit a revised plan. The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. 5.4 SDR 44-76 (Skate Palace) Review of a proposed 39,200 sq. ft . roller-skating rink on the S .W. Pacific Highway frontage road south of S .W. Park Street . A. Staff Report : Read by Daniels . B . Staff Recommendations : Staff recommends denial based on the fact that Planning Commission conditions have not been satisfied and that implementing these changes would create a major change in the traffic circu- lation pattern . o Staff informed the Board that an alternative to denial would be creating a timetable under which compliance with the Planning Commission conditions would be implemented. C . Applicant ' s Presentation : John Amundson, architect , stated that : - they would be glad to develop a time schedule for Planning Commission conditions MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 Page 5 - traffic circulation for the skate center would also affect the proposed racquet and swim club - owner had one year left on the billboard lease at which time it would be removed - facilities would be provided for 110 bicycles o McMonagle asked if the applicant could return with a new site plan showing traffic circulation and a timetable for compliance with Planning Commission conditions . Goldbach moved and Cook seconded to deny the pro- posal without prejudice . The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote . 5 . 5 SDR 40-76 (Randall Construction) Review of a proposed 53 unit apartment complex on S .W. Scholls Ferry Road, east of S .W. 121st Avenue . (Pre viously denied 11/9/76) . A . Staff Report : Read by Daniels. o Cook objected to staff finding #14 . o Staff stated that two story apartment buildings of the bulk proposed are incompatible with single family in their opinion . B. Staff Recommendations : Staff recommends denial based on the following: 1 . The type of structure is not compatible with the single family units to the south . 2 . Adequate recreational opportunities are not being provided. C . Applicant ' s Presentation : o Don McPrang, project manager, stated the follow- ing: - They were providing the two most desired recreation features - lawn area and pool . - Greenway play area would be adequate for the children . - Dumpsters would be screened with board-on- board cedar fence and arborvitae. MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 Page 6 - Apartments located as far from the single family homes as possible . They would be a mix of single story and two story . o McMonagle asked if the applicant had made any attempt to contact the adjacent owners about their concerns . o Applicant stated he had not . o McMonagle asked why no recreation provision had been made for smaller children . o Applicant stated that any facilities would be subject to vandalism plus there was no real need. o Staff restated their finding that the recreation opportunities were inadequate. o Olson stated that she could not deny the project because of the lack of recreation facilities . o Staff noted that for the cost of the swimming pool other forms of recreational equipment which would serve a wider variety of residents could be provided. D. Public Testimony : Dave Lynn , 11715 S .W. Hazelwood Loop, and Joe Garcia, 11755 S .W . Hazelwood Loop , stated that : - two story units were not compatible with their homes and a perimeter fence was necessary . o Gene Crater, 11700 S .W. Ashwood Ct . , expressed concern about - lack of screening or storage area for recrea- tional vehicles - mailbox arrangements - berm maintenance - asked that apartment units be single story . o McMonagle asked that the berm be built entirely on the Randall property . o Mrs . Beatly, 11715 S .W. Hazelwood Loop, stated that her fence was already on the berm and there- fore should not be moved. MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14 , 1976 Page 7 o Bob Gotterd asked for one story apartments in order to conform with single family homes and stated that the greenway play area was already over-used. o Staff presented two letters from neighborhood property owners as written testimony (letters from P. R. Krugle, 11670 S .W. Ashwood Ct . , Robert R. Hall , 11660 S .W . Ashwood Ct . ) . E . Board Discussion : o Olson asked that only one story units be adjacent to the single family homes . o Staff reinterated that they were recommending denial however if the Board intended to pass the project the following conditions should be attached : 1 . Landscape islands 8-10 ' wide . 2 . Plan for irrigation system be provided (subject to staff approval) . 3 . Minimum and maximum height of plant materials from American Standard for Nursery Stock . 4 . All trees be staked. 5 . Mail boxes be screened. 6 . Garbage areas be completely screened. 7. Street lights along S .W. Scholls Ferry Road be provided. 8 . The street opening onto S .W. 121st Avenue be to City standards as determined by the Director of Public Works. 9 . The applicant participate in the cost of the traffic signal at S .W. 121st and Scholls Ferry Road. The % of participation be determined by the City Council . 10 . Signing for this project be limited to that which is included in the submission . 11 . Those units closest to the single family *W; area be single story. 12 . A board-on-board fence be provided along the crest of the berm and match any existing fences already in place or a 6 ' fence along property line . "`MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 Page 8 "'lo ; o Applicant disagreed with the need for an automatic irrigation system and stated that hose bibbs 100 ' on center would be adequate. o After discussion it was agreed upon that a manual sprinkler system with wide arc impulse sprinklers for the open spaces and a. standard sprinkler system next to the building would be sufficient . Cook moved and Olson seconded to approve the proposal with the conditions provided by staff . The motion was approved by a unanimous voice vote. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW: o Don McPrang, architect , stated that the material would be plywood siding with cedar shingles as feature panels, composition shingles for the roof, metal flashing on eave ends and mill finish windows . o Cook stated that the development was presented as luxury apartments but this was not reflected in the low quality building materials . Cook moved and Olson seconded to approve the archi- tectural design as presented with the condition that anodized trim be on the windows and sliding doors, trim strip be on the upper eaves, and lights be spotted on the irrigation plan, sign be of cedar with carved name and address, and a drawing of mail boxes screen- ing be submitted for staff . The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. 5. 7 CU 33-76 (Snyder Roofing) Review of a proposed remodel to existing industrial build- ing and new parking lot at S .W. Hall Blvd. A. Staff Report : Read by Daniels . B. Staff Recommendations : 1 . The entire fence be sight obscuring and at least 8 ' tall . 2 . Evergreen shrubs be added to the front planting for the purpose of screening the parking area (subject to staff approval ) . ,ems 3. The red sunset maple be 14-12" caliper 8-10 ' tall . 4 . Hose bibbs be located within a reasonable distance of the plantings (subject to staff approval ) . MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14 , 1976 Page 9 C . Applicant 's Presentation : o Applicant stated that there were hose bibbs on front of building and drip system around the trees would be provided at a later time , - presented overlays showing fence height and asked for 8 ' just along the front and 6 ' for the rest of fence . Goldbach moved and Hammes seconded for approval with staff recommendations modifying #1 to read the north fence 8 ' tall , the east fence 6 ' high and the north and east fence and gate be sight obscuring. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW: Applicant stated that the intent was to upgrade the building with a corten canopy and gutter strip so that rust would not stain the building, mansard roof , new windows and doors, bronzed window frames, painted tan concrete walls. Hammes moved and Olson seconded to accept the proposal as presented. The motion was passed by unanimous voice vote . 5 .6 SDR 38-76 (Wayside Inn) Review of a proposed 120 unit motel on S .W. Pacific Highway, north of S .W. 69th Avenue . (Previously denied 11/23/76) . A . Staff Report : Staff updated the previous staff report , presented new landscape findings and a letter from the fire marshal . o Joe Gruelich, fire marshal , highlighted the points in his letter and informed the Board of the safety hazard a hotel presented. o McMonagle questioned the need for 28 ' access especially since the site was already graded. o Gruelich stated in his opinion 28 ' was necessary because of possible traffic problems associated with a motel . o McMonagle asked that painted strips and arrows be used to direct traffic on the site . MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14 , 1.976 Page 10 B . Applicant ' s Presentation : o Ken Cole, architect , addressed the widening of the access to 28 ' and the problems this would present with the parking. He also objected to widening the landscape islands . o Board decided that the interior islands should be deleted in order to provide wider islands on the end. Hammes moved and Olson seconded to approve the pro- posal with the following conditions : 1 . Landscape islands be 8-10 ' wide . 2 . Automatic sprinkler system plan in accordance with finding #2 be provided (subject to staff approval) . 3 . All trees be 12" caliper 10-121 . 4 . Street trees 11" caliper 10-12 ' be provided along future extension of S .W. 69th (variety and placement subject to staff approval) . 5 . Access via the secondary access point onto S .W. Pacific Highway be limited to the motel complex only. 6. Field inlet catch basin with a swail be pro- vided along the northern bank. 7. Signing and striping program be developed sub- ject to staff approval regarding directing traffic to S .W. 69th Avenue and not onto S .W. Pacific Highway via the secondary access drive . 8 . The driveway connecting S .W. 69th Avenue with Pacific Highway be enlarged to 281 . 9. Revised site plan be submitted for staff approval . The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW: Ken Cole, architect , stated that the motel would be four stories, seeded aggregate, exterior walls 1/2- 3/4 revirrock, air conditioning units would be hidden by grill work, mansard slated concrete roof tile, anoxized aluminimum clear galss double pan . MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14 , 1976 Page 11 Internal rain drains, colors : #417 Green Back Kelly, Miller paint 70-20 Tamarck. Cook, Olson and Goldbach objected to the mansard roof for the following reasons : architectural incompatible with the surrounding area and the color was unsuitable . Hammes moved and Cook seconded (Cook stated he would vote against the motion) to approve the architectural as presented. The motion failed in a 2 to 3 vote with Cook, Olson and Goldbach dissenting. Goldbach suggested that the terra cotta match the trim. The applicant agreed to present this as a new proposal . Olson moved and Hammes seconded to accept the archi- tectural as presented with the terra cotta mansard roof to be a brown color matching the trim. The motion was approved in a 4-1 vote with Cook dis- senting. 6 . ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 12 : 25 A.M. �+a�w