Loading...
12/14/1976 - Packet AGENDA TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 - 5 : 00 P.M. General Telephone Building 9040 S .W. Burnham St. - Tigard, Oregon 1 . CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES : 4 . COMMUNICATIONS : 5 . DESIGN REVIEW : 5 . 1 SDR 1-76 (Tigard Medical Clinic) Amendment to the Architectural Design of the Tigard Medical Clinic to allow a 3 ' x 30 ' wall sign on the west building face. 5.2 SDR 39-76 (Loewer) Review of a proposed 10 unit apartment complex on S .W. McKenzie Street . A. Site Development Plan B . Architectural Design 5 . 3 SDR 46-76 (Dickinson) Review of a proposed 20, 000 sq. ft . warehouse/office at 7325 S .W . Bonita Road. A. Site Development Plan B . Architectural Design 5 .4 SDR 44-76 (Skate Palace) Review of a proposed 39,200 sq . ft . rollerskaking rink on the S .W. Pacific Highway frontage road south of S .W. Park Street . A. Site Development Plan B . Architectural Design 5 .5 SDR 40-76 (Randall Construction) Review of a proposed 53 unit apartment complex on S .W. Scholls Ferry Road, east of S .W. 121st Avenue . (Previously denied 11/9/76) . A. Site Development Plan B. Architectural Design AGENDA TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 Page 2 5 .6 SDR 38-76 (Wayside Inn) Review of a proposed 120 unit motel on S .W. Pacific Highway, north of S .W. 69th Avenue . (Previously denied 11/23/76) . A. Site Development Plan B . Architectural Design 5 .7 CU 33-76 (Snyder Roofing) Review of a proposed remodel to existing industrial building and new parking lot at S .W. Hall Blvd. 6 . OTHER BUSINESS : 7. ADJOURNMENT: =arw STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5. 1 Aww TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 General Telephone 9040 S.W . Burnham - Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: SDR 1-76 (Tigard Medical Clinic) REQUEST: Amendment to the architectural design of the Tigard Medical Clinic to allow a 3 ' x 30 ' wall sign on the west building face. LOCATION: 13170 S .W . Pacific Highway WALL SIGN REVIEW: FINDINGS : 1 . On January 20, 1976 , the Tigard Planning Commission approved a conditional use request for a professional office build- ing and pharmacy in a C-3 zone . 2 . On January 27, 1976 , the site and architectural plans for the Tigard Medical Clinic were approved by the Design Review Board . No wall signs were presented. '++ilw 3 . As an amendment to the architectural plan the pharmacy occupying Tigard Medical Clinic is requesting architectural review of a 3 ' x 30 ' wall sign . 4 . The proposed sign complies with the City sign code . STAFF REPORT `41W AGENDA 5 . 1 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14 , 1976 The applicant has proposed an alternative to the staff proposal of rotating the building 1800 to achieve the required project orientation to S .W. 69th Avenue. A vastly improved landscape plan has been submitted (see landscape findings) .With the modifications suggested it appears to be acceptable . Communication from the Fire Marshal is attached. The State Highway Division proposal for the access point onto S .W. Pacific Highway has been incorporated into the site plan. Adequate number of parking spaces have been provided but the length required by the Tigard Municipal Code has not been adhered to . A more acceptable location is shown for the free standing sign but no detail has been provided. ''ftw STAFF REPORT TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA 5 . 2 General Telephone Building -5 :00 9040 S .W. Burnham St - Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: SDR 39-76 (Loewer) REQUEST: Site Development Plan and Architectural Design Review of a 10 unit townhouse apartment complex. LOCATION: S .W. McKenzie Street , west of S .W. Pacific Highway (Wash . Co . Tax Map 2S1 2BD, Tax Lot 700) . APPLICATION: John A . Loewer I . BASIC FACTS : 1 . The site is designated "Urban Medium Density Residential" on the Neighborhood Plan II and zoned "A-2, Multi-Family Residential" . 2. S .W. McKenzie is designated a local street on the Neighbor- hood Plan II requiring a 50 ' right-of.-way . 3. This parcel was partitioned from the adjacent lot by the Planning Commission on December 7, 1976 with the following conditions : 1 . That 5 ' be dedicated for street right-of-way along S .W. McKenzie Street . 2 . That a half street be required on S .W. McKenzie Street with a meandering sidewalk to miss the existing large trees . 3. That the single family residence be adequately screened from any multi-family housing that may develop . 4 . 18 . 58.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code states "A minimum of 200 sq . ft . of recreation area shall be provided for each of the first twenty dwelling units ; " according to table for computing Multi-family open space requirements states that 10 dwelling units will need a minimum of 2, 000 sq. ft . II . FINDINGS : 1 . The applicant is requesting review of a 10 apartment units in two buildings on a .83 acre site on McKenzie Street . 2 . A site plan for this site was denied, without prejudice, by the Design Review Board on November 9, 1976 due to an inadequate site plan and code deficiencies. The noted code deficiencies have been rectified on the site plan . STAFF REPORT TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA 5 . 2 General Telephone Building-5 : OO P.M. 9040 SW. Burnham St - Tigard, Oregon Page 2 3. The site is presently a horse pasture sloping away from S .W. McKenzie Street . 4 . The surrounding land use is a church on the west , a single story apartment complex on the south and Copeland Lumber Company on the east . 5 . S .W. McKenzie is a substandard one way (west) street constricted due to parking for the restaurant at the corner of S .W. Pacific Highway and McKenzie Street . 6 . According to the code 2, 000 sq . ft . of recreation area is necessary for the 10 units . This has not been pro- vided for on the plan . 7. Screening is shown for the single family house to remain in accordance with the Planning Commission condition. 8 . Screening between this site and the lumber yard has been improved and appears adequate . 9. S .W. McKenzie Street is 40 ' right-of-way thus requiring 5 ' dedication on this side in order to bring it up to code . The site plan shows this dedication . 10 . S .W. McKenzie is in a substandard condition and in need of improvement . 11 . The asphalt detail for the parking lot is not to City standards which are : 2" Class C Asphaltic concrete 2" 3/4"-0" Crushed rock/gravel 6" 2"-0" Crushed rock/gravel 12 . The Engineering Department has approved the drainage system. 13 . 6 ' sugar maple trees are rather small . 8 ' to 10 ' (1z" ) caliper would more adequately achieve the desired effect . III . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval as submitted with the exception that the parking lot be improved to city standards , the sugar maple be 8 - 10 ' (lz" caliper) and 2, 000 sq. ft . of recreation are to be_prov?ided. STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5. 3 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14 , 1976 - 5 :00 P.M. General Telephone 9040 S .W . Burnham - Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: SDR 46-76 (Dickinson Office/Warehouse) REQUEST : Review of a proposed 20 ,000 sq . ft . warehouse/office . LOCATION: 7327 S .W. Bonita Road (Wash . Co . Tax Map 2S1 12A, Tax Lot 500) APPLICANNT: John Tennant , Jr . I . BASIC FACTS : 1 . The site is zoned "M-3, Light Industrial" and designated "General Industrial" on the Tigard Community Plan . 2. S .W. Bonita Rd . is designated a collector street which requires a 60 ' minimum right-of-way width and S .W. 72nd Avenue is designated an arterial with a 80 ' - 120 ' minimum right-of-way . 3. 18 .64 . 040(e) of the Tigard Municipal Code states "There shall be a minimum distance of 30 ' between any two adjacent curb cuts on the same property . " 4 . Tigard Community Plan asks that access be controlled whenever possible on collector streets . 5 . 18 . 60 . 170 of the Tigard Municipal Code "All areas used for the standing or maneuvering of vehicles shall be improved according to the same specifications as required for city streets . " 6 . 18.64 .030 of the Tigard Municipal Code states "Vehicular access and egress for commercial and industrial uses shall not be less than the following : for 1-99 parking spaces - 30 ' minimum width - hard surface pavement over 80% of required access width" II . FINDINGS : 1 . The applicant is requesting to construct an office/ warehouse of approximately 20, 000 sq . ft . The firm has an existing warehouse and temporary office on the site. 2 . The submitted site plan show the following problems in relationship to curb cuts . a. New curb cuts are shown to be 20 ' wide, the Tigard Municipal Code calls for 30 ' minimum width with 24 ' in paving. STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 .3 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 Page 2 b. The western most new curb cut is shown to be adjacent the existing curb cut . The Tigard Municipal Code states that curb cuts should be a minimum of 30 ' apart and maximum of 30 ' wide . C. The site plan proposed 5 curb cuts within 500 ' . This proposal is not in accordance with the Tigard Community Plan need to minimize access on collector streets . 3 . The site is bordered by S .W. Bonita Road and S .W. 72nd. o S .W. Bonita Road currently has a 40 ' right-of-way. This would require a 10 ' dedication along the south property line and a 10 ' dedication along the east property line in order to bring it to collector street standards . 4 . S .W . 72nd currently has a 40 ' right-of-way . This would require a 20 ' dedication along the east property line in order to bring it to arterial street standards . 5 . S .W. Bonita Road and S .W. 72nd Avenue are in a deteriorating condition and need improvement in order to facilitate development . 6. The parking area is specified as gravel paved. In order to comply with the code parking areas would have to be paved as per city standards . 7. The rear parking area behind the existing warehouse has not been provided with a backout area for parking spaces #1 and 2 . 8 . No wheelblocks are shown for the parking spaces facing each other or for those adjacent tothe fence as required by the Tigard Municipal Code . 9. No wall sign or freestanding sign details have been sub- mitted in accordance with the submission requirements . LANDSCAPING I . BASIC FACTS : 1 . 18 . 58.080 of the Tigard Municipal Code states : ( 1) Tree and shrub plantings within parking areas shall be provided and maintained at approximately 70 ' on center each way . (2) All areas not occupied by paved roadways , structures, or walkways shall be landscaped. A minimum of the STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5. 3 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 Page 3 front 20 ' shall be landscaped. . . " II . FINDINGS : 1 . No parking islands 70 ' on center have been shown on the site plan . 2. The existing warehouse has only the front 11 ' landscaped instead of the required 201 . This area is currently planted in grass . 3. The west side of the existing building is presently planted in wild grasses . The addition of evergreen trees along this side would soften the impact of the building. 4 . The northeastern portion of the site is presently un- developed. The applicant has not presented a landscape plan for the area or stated that portions intended use . 5 . The landscape plan does not take into consideration future street improvement . Since S .W . Bonita is to be improved in the near future, landscaping should not be extended into the right-of-way. 6. The submitted landscape plan is deficient in the following: a. No details are shown for the landscape bed adjacent to the building. b. No method of irrigation is shown except for the area along the south property line . C . Plant material specification have not been shown in the standard form. In order to avoid confusion between the designer, the contractor, and the City, shrubs should be specified according to gallon can size and trees according to diameter and height . d. The applicant has presented a unique landscape plan in front of the building. The proposed landscape plan does not take advantage of these design opportunities . III . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS : Staff recommends approval with the following conditions : 1 . City Engineering Department recommends that : the curb cuts be to city standards , i .e. 30 ' curb cut with 30 ' between curb cuts. This can be achieved by ------------ STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 . 3 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 Page 4 closing the middle cut and combining the new one with the existing one . 2 . That before building permit be issued the following items be done : a. That 10 ' be dedicated on S .W. Bonita Road and 20 ' on S .W. 72nd. b. That a non-remonstrance agreement for a local improvement district on S .W . Bonita and S .W. 72nd be recorded. C. That the applicant acquire a street opening permit from the County for S .W. Bonita Road. 3. That the parking lot be improved to city standards . 4 . That a backout area be provided for the rear parking area. 5 . Wheelblocks be provided for the parking spaces facing " each other in the rear parking lot, and those spaces abutting the fence . LANDSCAPE RECOMMENDATIONS : 7. Landscape islands be placed 70 ' on center within the parking areas . 8 . Landscape bed in front of the existing warehouse be enlarged to 20 ' with shrub and tree plantings . 9. Evergreen trees be planted on the west side of the existing building . 10. A revised landscape plan including specifications and irrigation plan be submitted for the entire site . STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 .4 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14 , 1976 - 5 :00 P.M. General Telephone Building 9040 S .W. Burnham St . - Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: SDR 44-76 (Skate Palace) REQUEST: Review of a proposed roller-skating rink as the first phase of a family recreation center. LOCATION: Pacific Highway Frontage Road south of S .W. Park Street . APPLICANT: Al McFarland/Allied Realty I . BASIC FACTS : 1 . The site is designated "Residential Commercial" on the Tigard Community Plan and zoned "C-3 General Commercial . " 2. A conditional use permit (CU 22-76) was approved by the Planning Commission on August 17, 1976 . Their approval was conditional upon the following : 1 . The northern terminus of the frontage road be realigned and improved matching the center line with S .W. Park Street and having a 50 ' road approach onto Pacific ` Highway. This work to be approved by the OSHD and Tigard Engineering Department . 2 . The southern terminus be closed. 3 . The frontage road be improved to city local street standards to the northern access point into the main parking area with the remainder of the frontage road landscaped. 4 . A 6 ' bicycle/pedestrian path be included through the site to match up with the one approved as part of the medical/dental clinic . 5 . The applicant agree to participate in the costs of a street light for the intersection of the frontage road and S .W. Pacific Highway . 6 . The Oregon Transportation Commission be petitioned to relinquish jurisdiction to the City for the frontage road. 7. A grading plan be submitted for Design Review Board review. 3. The Tigard Community Plan states that high design standards for signing and appearance should be established in the commercial areas in order to improve the visual appearance of the city . STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 .4 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14 , 1976 Page 2 II . FINDINGS : 1 . The applicant is requesting review of Phase I of a multi-phased project to create a family recreation complex on the Pacific Highway frontage road, north of S .W . Park Street . 2 . The site slopes southeast . 3. The site is presently very overgrown with grass and berry vines . Numerous very old fruit and nut trees are scattered throughout the site . 4 . This proposal does not include any plans for the improve- ment or realignment of the frontage road as required by the Planning Commission . The City's petition to acquire jurisdiction over the frontage road has been approved by the State of Oregon Transportation Commission and is scheduled to be accepted by the City Council on December 13, 1976. Realignment of the northern end, closure of the southern end and improvement of the roadway, and determination as to traffic signalization needs are imperative prior to the opening of the skating complex. 5. No provision for providing the 6 ' pedestrian/bicycle path as required by Planning Commission condition 4 is shown on the site plan nor is any mention made for its provision in a later phase . 6 . When accepted by the City Council the frontage road will be classified by the Tigard Community Pian and Neighbor- hood Plan I as a local street . City standards call for a 50 ' right-of-way with a 34 ' pavement width and curb . This right-of-way must be provided prior determination of a front yard setback which is 10 ' in the C-3 zone. 7. A billboard exists on the southwest corner of the site. This billboard detracts from visual quality of this portion and would be improved. If removed it would further the goals of the Tigard Municipal Code to improve the visual environment along S .W. Pacific Highway . 8. The site plan designates a location for a sign yet no sign details have been submitted. LANDSCAPE SECTION I . Basic Facts : 1 . 18. 58 .060 (1) "Tree and shrub plantings within parking areas shall be provided and maintained at approximately STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 .4 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Page 3 II . FINDINGS 1 . The applicant has proposed utilizing many of the existing trees in the landscape plan . While this is commendable the following factors should be considered : a. The majority of the trees are old and in deteriorating condition, in addition poor pruning has permanently ruined their appearance . b. Fruit and nut trees are extremely high maintenance requiring spraying programs, pruning, and fruit pickup . Having them adjacent to pavement would re- quire constant fall cleanup . C . Construction work and grading around older trees will result in a substantial number being lost . Therefore, only those existing t=rees should be saved. that would be an asset to the site and would have a good chance of survival . 2 . The plan specified "Prunus Cerasifera ' thundercloud '" which ;41W is a purple leaf plum. This tree is only 20 ' -25 ' tall when mature and has a low branching habit . This type of tree is inappropriate for parking lot use and should be replaced with a larger shade tree . 3. Landscape islands 70 ' on center each way as per city code have not been shown on the plan . 4 . The landscape islands that are shown are of varying widths from 4-101 . A minimum of 8-10 ' is necessary to provide a proper growning area. 5 . No detail to the proposed irrigation system is provided. A note on the site plan states that it will be engineered during contract documents development . Such a statement is inadequate to determine whether the landscaping will be properly maintained as required by the Tigard Municipal Code . III . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS : Staff recommends denial based on the fact that Planning Commission conditions have not been satisfied and that implementing these changes would create a major change in the traffic circulation pattern . ,, : STAFF REPORT TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA 5 . 5 December 14, 1976 - 5 :00 P.M. General Telephone Building 9040 S .W. Burnham St. - Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: SDR 40-76 (Randall Construction) REQUEST: Review of a site development plan and architectural design of a 53 unit apartment complex. LOCATION: Southeast corner of S .W. 121st Avenue and S .W. Scholls Ferry Road. (Wash . Co . Tax Map 1S1 34AB, Tax Lot 100) . APPLICANT: The Robert Randall Company I . BASIC FACTS : 1 . The site is a portion of the Englewood Planned Development approved July 9, 1973 with among other conditions : 3. That site development plans and architectural design of the multi-family dwellings shall be subject to approval of the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits, to insure compatability with the single family neighborhood. qimw 4 . That a landscaped earth berm be installed along S .W. 121st Avenue and Scholls Ferry Road to help provide privacy for dwellings adjoining said streets . 10 . The applicant shall provide a minimum six foot meandering landscaped pedestrian/bikeway along and separated from the paved portion of S .W . Scholls Ferry Road. 11 . That the areas designated for apartment development be limited to 11 units/gross acre . 2 . The site is within the Englewood II subdivision plat . Applicable conditions to that approval were : 7. "Access to the multi-family tract may not be within 100 ' of Scholls Ferry Road and S .W. 121st Avenue . " 3. On November 9, 1976 Design Review Board denied the pro- posal without prejudice and asked that the plans be re- submitted with the following modifications : 1 . That the adjoining owners of single family units be contacted. 2 . That the access on 121st be 50 ' wide with a 24 ' w pavement width. 3 . That access onto Scholls Ferry Road be for emergency vehicles only. STAFF REPORT TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA 5. 5 December 14, 1976 - 5 :00 P.M. Page 2 4. That the bike path be entirely on the property. 5 . That an irrigation plan be submitted. 6 . That a landscape plan at 1 :20 ' scale for the areas around building structures be submitted. 4 . 18 .58 .040 "A minimum of 200 sq . ft . of recreation area shall be provided for each of the first 20 dwelling units ; 250 sq. ft . for units 21 through 30; and 300 sq . ft . for each unit over 30 . III . FINDINGS : 1 . The applicant is requesting architectural design and site development plan review of a 53 unit apartment complex as a part of the Englewood Planned Development . 2. The site is 4 .9 acres and slopes from S .W . 121st Avenue to the east with a 40 ' difference in elevation . The site has been stripped of vegetation. 3. There are 11 single family lots adjacent to this site . 4 . A neighborhood commercial planned development has been approved to the west across S .W. 121st Avenue . The area across S .W. Scholls Ferry is in Beaverton and presently undeveloped but designated low density residential . 5 . S .W. Scholls Ferry Road is a state highway that is under- going transition from a rural market road into an urban arterial . It is absent of street lighting . 6 . Participation in the costs of providing a traffic signal at the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road and S .W. 121st was required by the City Council in approving the neigh- borhood shopping center . This development will contribute substantially to the traffic problem and need for the signalization therefore, should also be partially re- sponsible for the cost of the signal . 7. The access point for the neighborhood commercial shopping center is 200 ' from the Scholls Ferry Road intersection . The proposed access point for this development is approx- imately 95 ' from the property line along Scholls Ferry Road. The center lines of these two drives should match up . 8 . The Tigard Community Plan , 1971 , includes as a policy that arterial streets will give limited access to adjoining property. The proposed access point onto Scholls Ferry Road will eventually serve as the primary access to over half of the project and will result in left turn movements from a narrow two lane road if provided now. The provision STAFF REPORT TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA 5. 5 December 14 , 1976 - 5 : 00 P.M. Page 3 of an access point onto Scholls Ferry Road at this time .is premature and should be prohibited until such time as Scholls Ferry Road is improved to arterial standards with a left turn refuge . The site plan is providing a break in the berm with ivy groundcover for emergency vehicle access . 9. Section 18.60. 120 requires 1 . 5 parking spaces/dwelling unit in apartment complexes . The site plan shows 79 spaces , whereas 80 are required. 10 . Section 18 .60 . 160 requires that parking spaces be a minimum of 916" x 19 . 11 . The pedestrian circulation appears to be inadequate . Additional pathway along the western and southern peri- meter of the site would resolve that problem. 12 . The proposed site plan envisions a swimming pool and sun deck to satisfy the recreational needs of the residents of the 53 units with two to three people/unit an estimated number . 100-150 people can be expected to reside in this iww; development . According to the city code a multi-family development of 53 units would need 13,400 sq. ft . for recreation space . Yet the only recreational opportunities offered are a motel sized pool , sundeck, and barbecue pit (approximately 3500 sq . ft . ) . No areas for unsupervised childrens activity is provided. The addition of a tennis court , a combination basketball/volleyball court , and a children 's play area would provide the needed recreational opportunities for residents of all ages and greatly enhance the project thus reducing the transiency exhibited by most multi-family projects . 13. The cross section of the driveway is not to City standards as required by the Tigard Municipal Court . 14 . Two story multi-family units is not compatible with single family residences . 15 . The site plan shows a 36 ' driveway width at the street . The Director of Public Works receommends that a standard City commercial apron be provided in accordance with the Tigard Municipal Code . LANDSCAPE SECTION FINDINGS : The applicant has addressed Design Review Board items 2-6 . The staff has contacted the adjoining land owners as per Design Review Board directive. STAFF REPORT TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA 5. 5 December 14, 1976 Page 4 1 . The plan proposes hose bibbs 100 ' on center as the method of irrigation . This type of irrigation is insufficient for the vast amount of lawn and landscape bids on the site. In addition, many of the plants specified on the plan (Phodys, azaleas , pieris, Verburnum, and ivy) are moisture loving plants and would have a low survival rate if not watered adequately . 2. Tree specifications list only the caliper size . A minimum and maximum height (taken from the American Standard for Nursery Stock) should be included in the specifications to insure plant quality. 3. No specifications for tree staking are on the plan. Since apartment complexes tend to have a high vandalism rate all trees should be staked for the first three years . 4 . No details are given for the landscape islands . These islands should be at least 8-10 ' in order to provide a suitable growing area. III . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS : Staff recommends denial based on the following: 1 . The type of structure is not compatible with the single family units to the south . 2. Adequate recreational opportunities are not being provided. MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Board FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: SDR 38-76 (Wayside Inn) At the last meeting (November 30, 1976) the Design Review Board denied the Wayside Inn application and asked that the applicant work with staff and resubmit a new proposal at the December 14th meeting. Staff met with the applicant on December 8th and was informed that revised plans would not be received until December 13th . For this reason it is not possible to include Wayside Inn plans and the revised staff report in the packets . STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.6 DECEMBER 14, 1976 LANDSCAPE FINDINGS : 1 . Landscape islands are shown to be 4 to 5 ' wide. This amount of space is insufficient to accomodate a tree and allow room for open car doors . The minimum width of 8-10 ' is necessary to support plant growth . 2 . No method of irrigation is specified on the plan . An automatic sprinkler system is advisable for the landscape beds adjacent to the building, bordering the parking lot , and the landscape island. The remaining areas could be serviced by wide coverage impulse sprinklers . 3. Tree size has been specified as 12" caliper . In order to insure quality a minimum and maximum tree height should be given. The American standard for nursery stock specified 10-12 ' for 12" caliper . 4 . The applicant has agreed to extend S .W. 69th through his pro- perty at a future date . At that time street trees should be provided in order to be compatible with the rest of S .W . 69th and comply with the Tigard Community Plan . RECOMMENDATIONS : 1 . Landscape islands be 8-10 ' wide . 2 . Automatic sprinkler system plan be provided (subject to staff approval ) . 3. All trees be 12" caliper 10-121 . 4 . Street trees 12" caliper 10 - 12 ' be provided along future extension of S .W . 69th (variety and placement subject to staff approval) . . STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5. 7 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14, 1976 - 5 : 00 p .m. General Telephone 9040 S .W. Burnham - Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: CU 33-76 (Snyder Roofing) REQUEST: Review of a proposed remodel to an existing industrial building and new parking lot . LOCATION: 12560 S .W. Hall Blvd. I . BASIC FACTS : 1 . The site is designated "General Industrial" on the Tigard Community Plan and zoned "M-3, Light Industrial . " 2. On April 20, 1976 the Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit for outside storage of wood pro- ducts . Conditions of that approval were : 1 . Adequate screen plantings be placed on the site . 2 . Landscaping be subject to review by the Design Review Board. 3. On December 7, 1976, the Planning Commission approved an amendment to the conditional use permit which allowed a sight obscuring fence rather than plant material with the following conditions : 1 . Outside storage no higher than 1 ' above the red- wood slats . 2. Two additional Red Maple trees be located along the front for purposes of screening. 3 . The sight obscuring ability of the fency be maintained. 4 . Fence height be determined by Design Review Board. 4 . 18 .58 .080 of the Tigard Municipal Code states "A minimum of the front 20 ' shall be landscaped. " II . FINDINGS : 1 . The applicant is requesting review of an architectural remodeling, new parking facilities, landscaping, and a sight obscuring fence. 2 . The plan specifies a 6 ' redwood slat fence on the east and west property lines, the fence along the south property line is chain link. Planning Commission directed Design Review Board to determine the height of the fence and made as a condition of approval that the fence be sight obscuring. The chain link fence along the south property line does not comply with this condition . r STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5. 7 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD WNW December 14 , 1976 Page 2 3. The Tigard Municipal Code asks that the front 20 ' be landscaped. This area is presently in turf . The applicant is proposing a row of juniper and 4 maple trees in this area. The addition of taller evergreen shrubs to block the view of the parking lot would be advisable . 4 . The red sunset maple are specified as 14" - 12" caliper, in order to insure quality a minimum and maximum size should be stated. 5. No method of irrigation has been shown on the plan . III . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions : 1 . The entire fence be sight obscuring and at least 8 ' tall . 2 . Evergreen shrubs be added to the front planting for the purpose of screening the parking area ( subject to staff approval) . 3. The red sunset maple be 14 - 121" caliper 8-10 ' tall . 4 . Hose bibbs be located within a reasonable distance of the plantings (subject to staff approval) .