Loading...
03/21/1974 - Minutes MINUTES TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Regular Meeting, March 21, 1974 Twality Jr. High School, Lecture Room 14650 S.W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon Meeting Time - 3:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Meeting was called to order at 3:30 P.M. 2. ROLL CALL A. Roll was called by staff. All regular members of the Tigard Site Development Plan and Design Review Board were present. 3. SELECTION OF OFFICERS 3.1 Selection of President A. Mickelson nominated Ray Bartel for President; Cook seconded; nominations were closed; by unanimous vote of board, Bartel was elected President. 3.2 Selection of Vice President wr A. Cook nominated Alan Mickelson for Vice President; Edin seconded; nominations were closed; by unanimous vote of board, Mickelson was elected Vice President. 3.3 Selection of Secretary A. Mickelson nominated Wink Brooks, Planning Director for Secretary; McMonagle seconded; nominations were closed; by unanimous vote of board, Brooks was elected Secretary. 4. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW 4.1 SDR 4-74 (Randall Construction Company) A request by Randall Construction Company for review of a mini-warehouse development located southerly of S.W. Burnham Street and approximately 550 feet east of S.W. Ash Avenue. Site comprises 5. 56 acres and is located in an M-4, Industrial Park zone. (Tax Map 2SI 2AD, Tax Lots 2200 and 2300''. Site Development Plan The staff showed appropriate slides and related staff findings contained within the staff report dated March 21, 1974. Considerable discussion occurred concerning the subject site development plan for the mini-warehouse. The following concerns were addressed by the Site Development Plan & Design Review loare and action was taken as described below: 1. Consideration of one access off Burnham Street and to revise landscape plan anJ siting accordingly. McMonagle moved to allow the access to remain as shown on the submitted site plan, Cook seconded the motion. The vote was 3 to 2; the motion carrying with Mickelson and Bartel voting NAY. PAGE 2 TSDP&DRB MINUTES - MARCH 21, 1974 2. irrigation to be provided to plant materials so that 75 foot hose can reach all plant materials. Mickelson moved for such a requirement. Cook seconded the. motion and the vote was unanimous. 3. Ground cover within landscape strip on perimeter OF site with physical protection of perimeter trees with extruded curbs. A 29 foot center aisle, a 26 foot southeasterly aisle with one additional foot for southeast landscape strip. Trees in strip to be columnar and coordinated with the General Telephone planting to the southeast. '.din moved for the above requirements and Mickelson seconded. The requirements were approved by unanimous vote. 4. Revised buildings to conform to Section 18.12.100 (TMC) relating to vision clearance. No formal vote was taken on this item. It was informally agreed by the board that this requirement should be met by the applicant. 5. Tree and shrub plantings in parking areas 70 feet on center each way. The board took no formal action on this item. 6. Public Works Department to comment on collection of surface water drainage with respect to freezing; hazardous from public safety standpoint. Problems with fire equipment access and people falling and the adequacy Of Water C011CCtiOn over large areas. This was primarily a concern of McMonagle, the board informally moved to direct staff to relay their concerns to the Department of Public Works for their review. 7. Site obscuring plantings along rear portion of property at service drives %me adjacent single family dwelling. Said planting to be approved by planning staff. Bartel moved for the adoption of this item, Cook seconded and the motion passed by unanimous vote. 8. No finish floor of any structure shall be lower than the elevation of the 100 year flood as defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. McMonagle moved to adopt this item, Bartel seconded and motion was passed by unanimous vote. 9. No access shall be allowed from the subject site to the westerly 16 foot easement adjacent the westerly boundary of the site. McMonagle moved and Edin seconded this motion. Passed by unanimous vote of board. 10. After further discussion, Edin moved for approval of the site development plan subject to the following conditions, McMonagle seconded and the vote was unanimous with said conditions. a. Irrigation to plant materials so that 75 foot hose can reach all plant materials. b. Ground cover and landscape strip on perimeter of site with protection to perimeter trees with extruded curbs. C. 29 foot center aisle and 26 foot southeasterly aisle with one additional. foot for southeast landscape strip. Trees in strip to be columnar and be coordinated with General Telephone plantings. *AW d. , Site obscuring plantings shall be placed along the rear portion of the property at service drives adjacent the single family dwelling. Said planting to be approved by the planning staff. PAGE 3 TSDPS:DRB MINUTES - MARCH 21, 1974 e. No finish floor of any structure shall be lower than the 100 year flood as defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. f. No access shall be allowed from the subject site to the 1.6 foot easement adjacent the subject site's westerly property line. Design Review After considerable discussion, Cook moved to approve the architectural plans subject to the following condition. Bartel seconded the motion. The motion was passed 3 to 2 with Edin and Mickelson votinc, NAY. The following is the condition: a. The applicant shall submit coloring and location system for unit identification; said system shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. A building permit may be issued, but an occupancy permit shall not b�, issued until an approved unit identification is approved by the Design Review Board. At this point, Mickelson moved for a five minute recess. Meeting was recessed at 5:40 P.M. Meeting was called back to order at 5:50 P.M. 4.2 SDR 5-74 (International King's Table) A request by International King's Table Restaurants for review of a restaurant development to be located on the northeastern corner of the intersection of S.W. 69th Avenue and Pacific Highway. The site comprises 1.01 acres and is located in a C-3, General Commercial zone. (Tax Map ISI 36AD, Tax Lot 4300. ) Site Development Plan The staff showed slides of the subject site and presented staff findings as related in their staff report of March 21, 1974. General discussion occurred between board members, the staff and representatives of the applicant. Several items were addressed as concerns of the board. Access to the Texaco service station, to the east, removal of the hedge along the property line, 10 foot setback as related to the placement of the restaurant structure on the site and the concern of raised walkways and curbs within the parking area. The Board felt these questions should be addressed on a revised site development plan. Consequently, Mickelson moved to table further site develop- ment plan review to the April 4th board meeting. Bartel seconded the [notion, and the motion passed with an unanimous vote of the board with McMonagle abstaining. Design Review Considerable informal discussion occurred concerning the architectural design of the restaurant building. Bartel commented on the motif and suggested the motif 144AW could be handled in a more subtle manner, suggesting a symbol. and not a full sign over the door, as well as landscape lighting on banners. Cook suggested canvas banners; Bartel, suggested flood lights on building will glare, and suggested other lighting sources. Mickelson agreed with smaller sign and wanted marble siding. Richard D. Harper of International King's Table and Michael S. PACE 4 TSDP&DRB MINUTES - MARCH 21, 1974 Lucy Mayernik participated in the informal discussion. Bartel felt that too much emphasis was placed on the entry way; the Board informally decided that no formal action would be taken until the April 4th meeting, agreeing by consensus that signs and illumination of parking areas are major concerns. Richard Harper of International King's Table, asked the Board for formal action, stating that elimination of the sign above the entry way of the building, would kill the project. After further discussion, the Board decided to take, formal action. Mickelson. moved to approve the architectural plans for the subject restaurant structure with the condition that the free standing sign located adjacent Pacific Highway not be allowed. Edin seconded the motion. The motion passed 3 to I with Cook voting no and McMonagle abstaining. 5. ADJOURNMENT A. Mickelson moved to adjourn, McMonagle seconded and the vote was unanimous to adjourn the meeting at 7:00 P.M.