03/21/1974 - Packet AGENDA
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Regular Meeting, March 21, 1.974
Twality Jr. High School, lecture room, 14650 S.W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
Meeting Time - 3:30 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. SELECTION OF OFFICERS
3. 1 Selection of President
3.2 Selection of Vice President
3.3 Selection of Secretary
4. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW
4.1 SDR 4-74 (Randall Construction Company)
A request by Randall Construction Company for review of a mini-
warehouse development located southerly of S.W. Burnham Street
and approximately 550 feet east of S.W. Ash Avenue. Site
comprises 5.56 acres and is located in an M-4, Industrial Park zone.
(Tax Map 2SI 2AD, Tax Lots 2200 and 2300).
Site Development Plan
Presentation by Applicant
Staff Findings
Board Discussion & Action
Design Review
Presentation by Applicant
Board Discussion and Action
4.2 SDR 5-74 (International King's Table)
A request by International King's Table Restaurants for review of a
restaurant development to be located on the northeastern corner of
the ititersection of S.W. 69th Avenue and Pacific Highway. The site
comprises 1.01 acres and is located in a C-3, General Commercial zone.
(Tax Map ISI 36AD, Tax Lot 4300).
Site Development Plan
Presentation by Applicant
Staff Findings
Board Discussion 4: Action
Design Review
Presentation by Applicant
Board Discussion and Action
5. MISCELLANEOUS
6. OTHER BUSINESS
7. ADJOURNMENT
r
4
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Staff Report
March 21 , 1974
Agenda Item 4. 1
SDR 4-74 (Randall Construction Company)
Site Development Plan Review
For property located southerly of S.W. Burnham St. and
approximately 550 east of S.W. Ash Avenue. Site comprises
5. 56 acres and is ' located in an M-4, Industrial Park zone.
(Tax Map 2S1', ZAD, Tax Lots 2200 and 2300)
Staff Findings
1. The Planning Commission , on February 5, 1974, took action
to approve a conditional use for warehousing in an fel-4,
Industrial Park zone. Said approval was subject to the
following conditions :
a. That the property owner(S) will support the form-
ation of a local improvement district so as to con-
struct S.W. Burnham Street to City collector street
standards and that the property owner(s) shall
execute a recordable convenant.
b. That the property owner(s) shall submit, for approval
by the Public Works Department , a storm drainage plan
for the subject property.
C. That the proposed use be subject to Site Development
and Architectural Design Review. Said review to
reflect the proposal ' s effect on adjacent single
family development and allow only the minimum number
oi' curb cuts necessary to allow adequate access to the
proposed use.
Minutes of said February 5 , 1974 meeting are attached.
2. The Public Workes Department has approved a storm drainage
plan for the subject site.
3. A single family Awelling exists at the rear of the
property.
4. Section 18. 58. 080 (TMC) states the following landscape
and screening standards for developments in M-4, Indust-
rial Park zones :
a . Tree and shrub plantings within parking areas shall
be provided and maintained at approximately seventy
' "'' feet on center each way.
,
b. All areas not occupied by paved roadways , structures,
or walkways shall be landscaped. A minimum of the
front twenty feet shall be landscaped to include any
or a combination of any of the following ; lawn , ever-
green or deciduous trees or shrubs, and perennial or
annual flowers.
5. Tree and shrub planting within the parking areas are not
provided at 20 feet on center each way.
6 . The applicant has not indicated how water will be provided
to sustain plant materials during periods of drought.
7. Section 18. 60.150 (b) (TMC) states, "service drives shall
be designed- and constructed to facilitate the flow of
traffic, provide maximum safety of traffic access and
egress and maximum safety of pedestrians and vehicular
traffic on the site , and shall have a minimum vision
clearance area as prescribed in Section 18. 12. 100 (b)
(TMC) . "
8. Section 18. 12. 100 (b) (TMC) states , "in all zones,
vision clearance areas shall be maintained between all
intersecting street (except alleys) extending twenty
feet back from the right-of-way intersection along both
sides of the spaces between the intersecting streets.
Except for occasional tree trunks or poles, these areas
shall be maintained without sight obstruction of any kind
for a vertical distance between three and ten feet above
the ground. "
9. Section 18. 58. 100 (a) states , "in reviewing the proposed
site development plan, the Site Development Plan and
Design Review Board shall consider the purposes and
standards of Title 18 and the. community plan with a
view to achieving a maximum of safety , convenience and
amenity for the subject property and adjoining properties.
To these ends the Board shall consider the location of
buildings , parking areas, and other features with respect
to the topography of the lot and its existing natural
features such as trees and slope, the efficiency , adequacy
and safety of the proposed layout of internal streets
and driveways, the adequacy and location of the green area
provided, bearing in mind the possible effects of irreg-
ularly-shaped lots; the adequacy , location and screening
of parking lots; and the adequacy of covenants , agree-
ments or other specific documents concerning the owner-
ship and maintenance of any common land. "
10. The subject site is designated "Commercial Industrial"
by the Tiqard Community Plan. Policy and Standard #3
of this designation states, "establish high design
standards for signing and appearance, including the land-
, scaping of setback areas and the designation of access
points. "
Page 2 - Planning Staff Report - March 21 , 1974
11. Miscellaneous staff concerns are as follows;
I
is adequate room allowed for the maneuvering of
truck and trailer rigs?
are two access points onto S.W. Burnham Street necessary?
how will the proposed chain link fence be handled at
the front portion of the portion of the property
and along the rear property line?
in what type of space are the perimeter trees to be
planted and will there be ground cover treatment to
these spaces?
Page 3 - Planning Staff Report - March 21 , 1974
I
C6' nditional Use
M3
SIA 04°'i � S '
0000
\ p000°o°o°o o p0000
00 °
Cl °O
M4
�I 'bF-WF-FZ PLAr
p 0 p 0 0°0 0
oo°000 00000000000
p°O°a°o°o°°°o
0000 0000000000 p°p°p ° °
000 000000
000000
000000
°°o0 00000000
i 0000000000 00000000
/ 0000000 00 00000000
0000000 0 00000000
�/ 00000000 0000 0
00000000 �00000�
000000000 00000
// 0000000000 00000
0000000000 00000000
// 00000°0000000000000 i� pop°p0p�ppp°p°p°� 000000000 00000000
0 00000000 00000000
/� 00 op0popopop-C p0p0p°poppp°p°pp
0000000 00000000
Iw ° 000000 00000000
�a000000 00000000
D00000 00000000
00000 00000000 _
I 0000000 0000000°p°O°p°O°
: U 00 00000000 l-,O 000000000
00000000
`` 0Dim
��.i 0000000
O iG 000 000000 ����
0000000
00000
�w 000 0 0
r ��L �j 0000000
,l
l �
\l 1
s
r 4. - Chairman Whittaker stated his agreement with the motion but also
offered his concern for the rear portion of the lot which is now
zoned RU-4 and is in fact land locked. He then encouraged the owners
to work with the property owner to the north of the development to
accomplish some means of access in order to develop this property as
currently zoned.
5. The motion was passed by unanimous vote of members present.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - Planned Development District: Extension of Construction
Time Period.
5.1 Planned Development District - Time Extension: zone change 9-31-71
(Wallace Johnson)
A request by Wallace E. Johnson to extend the construction time period
for a Planned Development District comprising 1.23 acres .at the
southwest corner of the intersection of S.W. Tigard Street and S.W.
Grant Avenue. (Tax Map 2S1 2BA,. Tax Lot 800).
A. Staff Findings
1. Brooks informed the Planning Commission that the applicant, Wallace
Johnson, has withdrawn his request for extension of the construction
time period.
B. Commission Discussion and Action
1%W 1. Mickelson moved that the staff recommendation for withdrawal of the
Planned Development District be accepted. Hartman seconded and the
motion passed by unanimous vote of the members present.
6. PUBLIC HEARING - Conditional Use
6.1 Conditional Use - CU 2-74 (Randall Construction)
A request by Randall Construction Company, Inc. to allow a warehouse
use in an M-4, Industrial Park zone. Subject property comprises 5.56
acres south of S.W. Burnham Street, approximately 500 feet east of S.W.
Ash Avenue. (Tax Map 2S1 2AD, Tax Lots 2200 and 2300).
A. Staff Findings-
1. Brooks presented the staff findings pertaining to this request.
B. Testimony and Cross Examination
Proponents
1. John Johnson, from Randall Construction Company, spoke for the request,
providing the following information:
a. That the proposed warehouse facility would require a minimum of
public services, to include police protection as the facility will
have a security guard living on the premises.
PAGE 4 - PC MINUTES - FEBRUARY 5, 1974
r
b. There would be no conflicts with adjoining uses.
c. The proposed rental warehouse space will provide a community benefit
because there are no similar facilities in the Tigard area and this
will alleviate the existing problem of boat and trailer storage
on City streets.
Cross Examination
a. Hartman asked Mr. Johnson if it were likely that the spaces being
rented would be used for purposes other than storage, such as
rebuilding antique cars or .rock group. practicing areas.
b. Mr. Johnson replied that this depends on the management of this type
of facility and what their restrictions are, but that "yes" other uses
— such as auto repairs, etc. could take place in the rented storage
areas.
c. Barkhurst asked the floor area of the buildings being proposed
for the site.
d. Mr. Johnson replied that 110,000 square feet of storage area is
planned for the site.
e. Barkhurst asked when construction could begin.
f. Mr. Johnson replied immediately.
g. Mickelson asked if these buildings were completely enclosed and
supplied with utility services.
h. Mr. Johnson said that each space will have its own door, such
as a garage door and will be supplied with power, making possible
the use of a space heater. However, other utility services such
as water would not be available.
i. Chairman Whittaker asked if 10% of the site area had been landscaped.
j. The Planning Director responded that there was not a 10% requirement
in the M-4 zone and this was therefore not a consideration on the
site plan.
k. Sakata asked if this facility were similar to the one on Allen Blvd.
in Beaverton.
1. Mr. Johnson replied that it was.
m. Hartman stated his opinion that the presentation by the applicant
has not established a changing condition which would justify the
conditional use.
Opponents
,,, a. There was no one present in opposition to the request.
PAGE 5 - PC MINUTES - FEBRUARY 5, 1974
C. Staff Recommendation
! 1. Staff recommended approval of the conditional use request with
conditions.
2. Barkhurst asked if the quarters for the security guard were allowed
in the M-4 zone.
3. Brooks replied that a dwelling for a security guard was a permitted
use in the M-4 zone.
D. Commission Discussion and Action
1. Hartman moved to approve the request subject to the three recommended
staff conditions.
a. That the property owner(s) will support the formation of a local
improvement district so as to construct S.W. Burnham Street to
City collector street standards and that the property-owner(s)
shall execute a recordable convenant.
b. That the property owner(s) shall submit, for approval by the Public
Works Department, a storm drainage plan for the subject property.
c. That the proposed use be subject to Site Development and Architectural
Design Review. Said review to reflect the proposal's effect on
adjacent single family development and allow only the minimum number of
curb cuts necessary to allow adequate access to the proposed use.
' 2. Nicoli seconded, and the motion passed by unanimous vote of those
members present.
6.2 Conditional Use - CU 3-74 (Vermilye and Raz)
A request by H. P. Vermilye to allow residential and commercial glazing
in a C-3, General Commercial zone. The subject site comprises .11 acres
and is located at 12500 S.W. Main Street (Tax Map 2S1 2AC, Tax Lot 600).
A. Staff Findings
1. Brooks presented the staff findings.
B. Testimony and Cross Examination
Proponents
a. Mr. Raz was present and stated that he had not prepared a presentation
for the Planning Commission but could answer any of their questions.
Cross Examination
a. Chairman Whittaker asked what type of business would be conducted
on the site.
PAGE 6 - PC MINUTES - FEBRUARY 5, 1974