Loading...
05/02/1974 - Packet AGENDA TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Regular Meeting, May 2, 1974 Twality Junior High School, Lecture Room 14650 S.W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon. Meeting Time: 4:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW 3. 1 SDR 29-73 (Hulburt's Country Inn) A request by the applicant to reconsider a site development plan previously approved by the Planning Commission. Subject site is located between the Beaverton-Tigard Expressway and S.W. Shady Lane, immediately east of an existing service station. The site comprises 1.47 acres and is located in a C-3, General Commercial zone. (Tax Map 1S1 35B, Tax Lot 205). Site Development Plan Review Presentation by Applicant ' Staff Findings Board Discussion and Action 3.2 SDR 7-74 (Columbia Pool & Recreation Company) A request by Columbia Pool & Recreation Company for review of a retail swimming pool sales facility on a site located at 13015 S.W. Pacific Highway and comprising .56 acres. The site is located in a C-3, General Commercial zone. (Tax Map 2S1 2BD, Tax Lot 2900 & 3000). Site Development Plan Review Presentation by Applicant Staff Findings Board Discussion and Action 3.3 SDR 1-74 (Mayernik) A request by Michael & Lucy Mayernik for Board approval of the removal of a laurel hedge on property located on the northeast corner of S.W. 69th Avenue & Pacific Highway. Previous zone change action required Board approval prior to removal of subject hedge. (Tax Map 1S1 36AD, Tax Lot 4300). Presentation by Applicant Staff Findings Board Discussion & Action 4. OTHER BUSINESS 5. ADJOURNMENT SITE D[VELUM[NT PLAN 1 O[STGN REUI[U BnARD. Staff Report May 2, 1974 Agenda Item 3. 1 SDR 29=73 /Hulburt ' o Country Inn) Qita__ 22velop22nt I Plan Review A review of a site proposal previously reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission for property located between the Beaverton-Tigard Expressway & S.W. Shady Lane, immediately east of an axiotfn� service station. The site comprises I^ 47 acres and is located in s C-3, General Commercial zone. Staff FindiaQs l. The subject site development plan was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission at their September 18, 1974 regular meeting. 2. The revised plan now before the Board differs from the original plan in the following respects. The building has been rotated on the site to provide better on-site vehicular circulation and to provide for o covered canopy entrance. o Adjacent State Highway right-of-way is proposed for use to enlarge the parking area. This oIIoua the parking of additional cars and provides additional landscaping space. 3^ The subject revised site development plan does not meet the following requirements of the Tigard Municipal Code. 18. 08. 420 - defines perking space as "rectangle not lees than twenty feet long and nine feet uido. . . ° . ~ n 5 spaces are deficient. 18. 12. I00 /b\ provides for vision clearance areas at the corners of on-site structures extending 20 feet back from the intersection of service drives, along the service drives.,--Corners of proposed structure slightly defirient. ~ 18° 50~ 000 /l\ provides tree and shrub planting shall be provided within parking areas at approximately 70 foot on center each way. --2 areas need trees to moot thin requirement. 19° 58. 060 /2\ provide that a minimum of the front lO yaot from the street right-of- way shall be landscaped. --Site plan indicates 8 feet, landscape plan � shows 12 feet. ' 13^ 60. 150 /a\ provide that no maneuvering for on- site parking shall occur within a street. --One space requires monauoaring in street; further provides that services drives be constructed to facilitate traffic flow & public safety and provides for minimum vision clearance as provided in section 18" 12. 100 /b\-~2 perking spaces are affected by this ordinanca provision. 18° 60. 180 provides that bumper rails or curbs be provided at parking lot perimatarn. -- None are indicated on subject site plan. 18, 64° 040 /o\ provides that no curb cute shall bo allowed within five feet of an adjacent property line except when joint ac000a is provided by City approved agreement--The westerly drive proposes a curb cut within 5 Peet of the adjoining property. 4. Additional concern relates to the following : o The applicant has not submitted a storm drainage Ian to assure conformance with Section 18~ 60. I90 (Tigard Municipal Code) , providing that drainage from parking lots will not flow across public sidewalks and streets. v No method of irrigation is indicated to assure uater to plant materials during periods of drought. Page 2 - HuIburt ' a Country Inn ~ 5tafP Report ' ~ Tentative Recommendation Approval of the applicants revised site development and landscape plans received by the City April ?O, 1974, � �� subject to the following conditions : l. That the applicant submit o revised site and landscape plana meeting all provisions of the Tigard Municipal Code. 2° That the applicant submit assurance from a professional landscape architect or horticulturist that all plant materials will survive periods of drought. If said plan materials will not survive periods of drought then the applicant shall submit an irrigation plan acceptable to the planning staff. 3. That the applicant submit a drainage plan for the subject site. Said plan shall be subject to the approval of the Lity Public Uorko Department. 4WW Page 2 — Hulburt ` a Country Inn — Staff Report / SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN A DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ��. Staff 7eport Mqy 2, 1974 Agenda Item 3. 2 5OR 7-74 (Columbia Pool J. Recreation Co. ) Site I t Plan Review For property located at I3OI5 S.W. Pacific Highway, comprising ^ 56 acres and located in a 7-3' General Commercial zone. Staff Findings I. The Planning Commission on March I9/ 1974 took action to approve a conditional use on the subject site for retail swimming pool sales. The use was approved with conditions. Please refer to the attached minutes. 2. The subject site development plan does not meet the following rsquirements of the Tigard Municipal Coda~ 18° 60. 120 /5\ /A \ l /C\ - providing parking standards For retail w� commercial and office uaeo^ lG spaces are required for uses proposed on this site. The subject proposal contains Parkin,-,; for 7 cars. 18. 6n. 160 - parking and loading eroaa shall be accessible from o street and such eocoGa shall moot standards set forth in Chapter 18° 54 (Tigard Municipal Code) .--Chapter 18° 64 required 24 foot access for the number of parking opa000 required on subject site. The applicant ' !: proposal indicates a IO foot access. 18~ 60. 180 - provides that bumper rails or curbs be placed along the boundaries of parking lots four feet within property lines. --none currently present. I8a8" O5O /I\ - provides that tree A shrub plantings K placed within parking areas at 70 feet on cantor each uay, additional trees are necessary to meet this requirement Tentative Approval of the applicants site deoeIopment and landocopo plan received by the City April 2A° 1974, subject to the following conditions : - � I . That the applicant submit a revised site and landscape plan meeting all prouisiore of the Tigard NunioipaI Code. 3aid revised site and landscape plan to be reviewed by the Planning staff to assure conformance with applicable Tigard Municipal Cods roquiremnnts. Page 2 — Columbia Pool — Staff Report SDP A DAF� StaFf Roper!- May Agenda itet,- SDRM 1-74 (Mayernik) Miscellaneous Revieu Request to removp Nural hodge as pDr a canditio,-I of I 6-73, PrOPerty loco ated n the northeest vornc:,,. of S.W. 69t1} Ave. A PaciPic Highway Staff Findina LLLL�; 1. On February 2E, 1574 the City Council took act1rl,­1 to approve is zone changn to C-3, Gene ral Eammercial with the followio ng cndition : "That Ve Dural hedge now praS3nt upon said premises shall not be removed in cont" 2ction with the developmanj: of said site except upon prior approval of the Sit,-,, Plan Review Roard. t' 2. The subject hedge is adjacent a residential zone and provides a visual buffer between future commercial use low on the it subject su and adjaceit res_de rtiRl use, According to the applicant the hedge is a maintenance proLlem and tnr adjacent property owner also Favors removal of 3 hedge. 3. TF the hedge is removed, care should Le taken to assurL-: that the adjacent resp duntial use is well buffered fron, future commmrcial activity on tho subjcct site by a woll landscaped buffer strip. 4 . According to the applicant, the hedge straddles the propett\1 line between the subject site and the adjac2nt residential- property. Staff 9ecommendation Approval OF the applicant removing the laurel hedge subject to thE Following condition. The applicant provide evidence the affected adjacenL property owner favors removal of the subject hodge. 14iwl x s�v FD SF0 PINE ST. WASHINGTON_ COUNTY' TIGARD S�•fl S�fl sµ+�r Krrrr�� ))30o0o0o0o0000o°0000O00000000 00 3°Oo� QOD0000vAcAMr �Oo° 00000Roo o°°° �11.4�000 �o00000000 ` X0000000000000000000000 30000000000000000000000 D0000000000000000000000 X0000000000°000000°0000° 14P RTM�1�1'i '� °00 °°°°s 10000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000 ' +✓ O000000000000000000000 �o°o°OO000000Q0000°0000 00&°0°0 • 00°O 90)9 ° oo°°o°o () 10000000000000000000000000 R 2 UtA 0000000000000000000000 0° 500000000000000000000 00°000°°0°°00°0°000 °0°°0°0° 000000000000000 0000000000000 00000000000 . °0000000° O000000 000oo SFU r ' G � G QP ZONE CHANGE awE«MC 00 subject area