01/16/1975 - Packet AGENDA
Tigard Site Development and Design Review Board
Regular Meeting, January 16, 1975
Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room
14650 S. W. 97th Avenue , Tigard, Oregon
Meeting Time : 4:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3.1 Regular Meeting of December 5, 1974
4. SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
4.1 SDR 3-75 (R. A. Gray - Tigard Industrial Park)
A request by R. A. Gray Construction Company for review of phase
IV in the Tigard Industrial Park on Tigard Street to construct an
industrial building. (Tax Map 2S1 2BA, Tax Lot 300) .
+ Site Development Plan Review
Staff Findings
Presentation by Applicant
Board Discussion and Action
Architectural Review
Presentation by Applicant
Board Discussion and Action
5. OTHER BUSINESS
6. ADJOURNMENT
SITE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Staff Report
January 16, 1975
Agenda Item 4.1
SDR 3-75 ( R. A. Gray & Co. )
Site Development Plan Review
for site located at 9920 S. W. Tigard St. , within the Tigard
Industrial Park and zoned M-4 (NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Sec.
2, T2S, R1W, W. M. )
Staff Findings
1. This project has been considered previously as:
Site Design Review 6-74 (approved in April, 1974)
Conditional Use 5-72 (approved in March, 1972; April, 1974)
Ordinance 72-31 (passed in April, 1972)
Variance 2-72 (approved in March, 1972)
2. Two different previously-approved site plans for the overall
project development -- differing variously from the one
submitted with this proposal in building sizes and lo-
cations; parking lot dimensions, number of "head-in" park-
ing lot stalls and aisle widths and landscaped areas are
on file with the City of Tigard.
3. A dedicated street (Co. Rd. 893) traverses the site from
east to west more or less through the center of the site.
Planting areas and parking stalls are presently installed
in the street right-of-way.
4. The building proposed as "Tigard III" is possibly partly
in the right-of-way of Co. Rd. 893.
5. The sideyard setback established by variance for "Tigard
IV" project does not apply to presently proposed "Tigard
III" . Tigard III is shown 20 ' from a side lot line abutting
an R-7 zone where a 50 ' side yard setback is required
(18. 52.020 TMC) .
6. Access drives within the presently proposed "Tigard III"
area providing access to the rear of the site are inadequate
for truck maneuvering.
7. Plantings as required in parking areas are not provided
(18.58.060 TMC) .
8. Present and proposed landscaping is diminutive in scale
and ought to be supplemented with large, hardy, native
trees.
9. Site inspection showed differences between approved
drawings and present (existing) site development.
a. front yard required landscaping (20 ft. ) appears to
be 10 ft. + as built
b. required side yard landscaping and sight obscuring
fence or hedge has not been installed
c. A portion of the agreed to parking area is presently
used for storage of building materials and has not been
striped.
d. Front parking area appears to differ in location and
configuration from approved.
e. Planting area at north end of "Tigard III" appears to
be reduced in size fr m approved.
10. Several violations of Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.52.010
and 18. 52.020 (permitted uses in the Industrial Park zone)
were noted by staff on site inspection:
a. retail sales conducted in building known as "Tigard I"
b. outside storage of heavy equipment
C. outside storage of building materials
d. gymnastic center in building known as "Tigard IV"
e. contractors offices
Staff Recommendation
The staff recommends that the board deny this request as sub-
mitted. The staff further recommends that the board could
consider tabling until such time as :
1) Plans accurately depicting present development, to include
location and sizes of parking spaces , curbs, walkways,
luminaires , lot lines, vegitation, buildings , utilities,
drains , service areas, loading areas and sprinkler system.
2) vacates of Co. Rd. 893 is accomplished
3) conditions of CU5-72 (and ordinance 72-31) are met or
changed
4) provisions of Chapter 18. 52, TMC, (Industrial Park Zone)
with respect to permitted uses are met by either abatement
of proscribed uses or by application for conditional use
where the use is conditionally acceptable
SDR Staff Report - January 16, 1975 - page 2