02/13/1975 - Minutes MINUTES
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
February 13, 1975 (Special Meeting)
Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room
14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
1. CALL TO ORDER: 4:40 p.m. , Chairman Bartel
2. ROLL CALL: Members present - Bartel, Cook, McMonagle, Kelting
(alternate for Edin) ; staff - Powell
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: moved (Kelting) seconded (Wakem) , to
approve as read the minutes of January 16
and February 6 meetings
Staff requested that agenda be suspended to consider "Shakey ' s"
architectural review first
5. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (only)
5.1 SDR 24-74 - Shakey 's Pizza
A request for architectural design review of a restaurant to
be part of a previously considered site at SW 69th and Pacific.
A. Applicant ' s Presentation
Tom Lewis,for Shakey ' s, presented the plans and displayed
materials to be used.
B. Board Discussion and Action
Board discussion centered on the view of the building offered
approaching passersby from Pacific Highway travelling west
and from 69th St. travelling south.
Moved (Cook) , seconded (Wakem) to approve the building with
the condition that wood shakes be used rather than metal.
Moved (Kelting) , seconded (Wakem) to amend Cook ' s motion
to require the north and east elevations to be covered above
the pilasters (parapets) with a natural material (wood
shakes or similar) .
Motion to amend carried (majority) .
Motion to approve (drawings as red marked) as amended
carried (unanimous) .
4. SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
4.1 SDR 4-75 - Setniker Auto Repair
A request for site design and architectural review of an auto
repair shop on SW Pacific Hwy.
A. Staff Findings
Staff findings (qv) presented by Powell.
B. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommendation in report was
amended to "denial" with recommendation that board confer
with applicant and that applicant be invited to modify his
plans and return to a subsequent meeting.
C. Board Discussion and Action
1. Board discussed following primary concerns :
a. access and parking for house would require backing
onto a commercial street
b. no minor land partition has been applied for yet
only 1/3 of site is provided for in site plans
C. landscape plan does not identify existing plantings
or the landscaping and maintenance of the ravine
to the rear.
2. Moved (McMonagle) to deny (second Cook) with following
conditions for resubmission and favorable consideration:
a. parking be perpendicular to building or adequate back out
and turning space be provided.
b. take design and future use of entire site into con-
sideration as much as possible
c. move access to site to the west (center of lot) if
feasible and provide joint access �to house and shop
d. provide 10 '-15 ' additional fill at east end of lot
to provide additional space for parking or turn
building 90 degrees to parallel street.
Motion carried by majority with Kelting opposed.
D. Request by applicant for board to view the architectural plans
for purpose of informal opinion on their admisability if site
plan ok 'd subsequently.
Board complied with request and concurred that building needed
some surface treatment and a less "tricky" facia than the
proposed false mansard.
6. OTHER BUSINESS - none
f 7. ADJOURNMENT - 7:30 p.m.
SDR Minutes -2/13/75 - page 2