02/20/1975 - Packet AGENDA
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Regular Meeting - February 20, 1975
Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room
14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
Meeting time: 4:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
4. SITE DESIGN & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
4.1 "McDonalds" (SDR 6-75)
A request for site design and architectural review of a proposed
franchise fast foods restaurant at SW Pacific Highway and School
Street
4.2 "Tigard Industrial Park" (SDR 3-75)
A request for site design and architectural review of a proposed
light industrial building in an industrial park (Tigard Industrial
Park) located at 9920 SW Tigard Street.
5. OTHER BUSINESS
5.1 John Setniker has requested a pre-design conference con-
cerning his proposed auto repair shop on S. W. Pacific Highway.
6. ADJOURNMENT
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Staff Report
February vU, 1975
SDR 6-75 (McDonalds Restaurant) - (Robertson property)
Applicant's Request
To construct a drive-in restaurant facility on Pacific Hwy.
at School Street
Staff Findings
1. The restaurant is proposed to be constructed on a portion
of a larger lot which has been approved by the Planning
Commission for partitioning on February 18, 1975. The
Commission approved the Minor Land Partitioning with
recommendation to the Design Review Board that access not
be provided to School Street and that a fence be con-
structed along this frontage to eliminate pedestrian access.
2. The Tigard City Council, at their February 17, 1975, meet-
ing made a similar statement and directed a recommendation
to the Design Review Board that through access not be per-
mitted to School Street and that a fence would be appropri-
ate along the School street property line. If the access
drive to School Street is eliminated, there will be a need
for additional landscaping (70 feet on center) in the park-
ing area.
3. The landscape plan meets the l0% area requirement.
4. The landscape plan is viewed as deficient by the staff in
the following areas :
a) Along the back row of parking (north property line)
landscaping is not provided at 70 feet on center.
b) The planting area on the west and north property
lines should include deciduous trees in addition to
the indicated ground cover.
c) The landscape islands in the center of the parking
area are shown as being 10 feet in width on the land-
scape plan and 4 feet on the site plan. The 10 feet
is preferable.
d) The landscape plan does not specify the numbers of
plant materials to be planted or planting intervals
for shrubs or ground cover.
e) Location of entrance and exit on Pacific Highway con-
,,"o flict with 1) a power pole on the corner of Pacific
Hwy. and School Street and with traffic entering the
adjacent Standard station. A joint access agreement
has been executed between Standard Stations , Inc. and
the applicant, but an obvious conflict between autos
exiting McDonalds queuing at the exit apron and autos
leaving fast moving traffic on Pacific Highway in order
to "slide" into the service station. Additionally,
some discrepancy exists between the proposed driveway
cut and the existing driveway cut as shown on topog
sheets furnished by applicant.
f) Entrance and exit signs and some landscaping are within
20 ' vision clearance cone.
g) Parking exceeds maximum requirement.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the site plan on the condition
that l) the applicant submits acceptable landscape plans
which show planting interval, numbers, sizes and species of
plants.
2. that no access be allowed to SW School Street and that
the site plan and landscaping on site be modified to
reflect the change in access. Specific recommendations
or changes may be placed on the site plan as well.
3. that the exit and entrance locations be interchanged
.,, such that the entrance is southerly of the building and
the exit northerly. (Staff realises that this is not
consistent with general practice) .
4. that a separation such as that shown on the landscape plan
be provided in the back parking row
' ,
DRB staff report - February 20, 1975 - item 4.1 - page 2
SITE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Staff Report
February 20, 1975
Agenda Item 4.2
SDR 3-75 (R. A. Gray & Co. )
Site Development Plan Review
for site located at 9920 SW Tiand Street, within the Tigard
Industrial Park and zoned M-4 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Sec.
2, T2S, R1W, W. M. )
Staff Findings
1. This project has been previously considered in the following
cases :
Site Design Review 6- 74 (approved in April, 1974)
Conditional Use 5-72 (approved in March, 1972; April, 1974)
Ordinance 72-31 (passed in April, 1972)
Variance 2-72 (approved in March, 1972)
2. Two different previously-approved site plans for the overall
project development, differing variously from the one sub-
mitted with this proposal in building sizes and locations;
parking lot dimensions, number of "head-in" parking lot
stalls and aisle widths and landscaped areas are on file
with the City of Tigard. Applicant has now submitted an
amended site plan to supercede previously-submitted plans.
3. A dedicated street (County Rd. 893) traverses the site from
east to west more or less through the center of the site.
Planting areas and parking stalls are presently installed
in the street right-of-way. Staff Understands that appli-
cant has commenced vacation proceedings for the portions
of the county road traversing his site.
4. Access drives within the presently proposed "Tigard III"
area providing access to the rear of the site are inad-
equate for truck maneuvering.
5. Plantings as required in parking areas are not provided
(18.58.060 TMC) .
6. Present and proposed landscaping is diminutive in scale
and ought to be supplemented with large, hardy, native
trees. Fill areas to the rear of the site have been left
unprotected and have not been landscaped as required by
Tigard code.
7. Sight screening required between industrial zone and resi-
dential zoned areas is not presently adequate.
8. Luminaire placement on existing buildings is poor.
9. Site inspection showed differences between approved draw-
ings and present (existing) site development:
a. front yard required landscaping (20 ft. ) appears to
be 10 ft. ± as built
b. required side yard landscaping and sight obscuring
fence or hedge has not been installed
c. Front parking area appears to differ in location and
configuration from approved
d. Planting area at north end of "Tigard III" appears to
be reduced in size from approved.
Staff Recommendation
The staff recommends that the Board approve this request as
submitted on conditions that:
1. Plans accurately depicting present development, to in-
clude location and sizes of parking spaces, curbs, walk-
ways, luminaires, lot lines, vegetation, buildings,
utilities , drains, service areas, loading areas and sprink-
ler system.
2. Vacation of Co. Rd. 893 is accomplished before building
permit may be granted.
3. Conditions of CU 5-72 and V 2-72 as confirmed in Tigard
ordinance 72-31 are met.
4. Provisions of Chapter 18.52 (TMC) , (Industrial Park Zone)
with respect to permitted uses are met by either abatement
of proscribed uses or by application for conditional use
where the use is conditionally acceptable.
5. Either proposed building, Tigard III, is shortened 10-15
feet or curb-cropped back to provide minimum access to rear
and provide adequate sight clearance around building corner.
6. Developer submit landscape plan for whole development and
work toward its implementation.
i�
SDR Staff Report - January 16, 1975 - page 2