The URL can be used to link to this page

8343 ~ Pine Street - 534 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE No. 76- ,.5'1 AN ORDINANCE VACATING PORTIONS OF A DEDICATED STREET WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION OF KINGSTON, CITY OF TIGARD. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS : Section 1: The City Council finds that on the 8th day of November, 1976, by Resolution No. 76-91, the City Council initiated proceedings pursuant to ORS 271. 130 to vacate portions of a dedicated street within the Subdivision of "KINGSTON" within the city. The portion to be- dedicated is described in exhibit "A"- attached to this ordinance and by this reference made a part of it. Section 2 : The City Council finds that proper notice was given as required by ORS 271.110 of the time and place for hearing of the proposed vacation and public hearing was duly and regularly held by the Council on December 134' 1976, at Fowler Junior High School within the City, and all objections to the vacation were properly heard and considered, and all interested persons appearing were given an opportunity to be heard. - Section eard. -Section 3 : The Council finds that the public interests will not be prejudiced by a vacation of the portions of the street described in exhibit "A" and the Council finds that the vacation of the area described in exhibit "A" is in the public interest. Section 4 : The vacation of the property described in exhibit "A" is hereby approved. Section 5 : Nothing in this ordinance shall cause or require the removal or abandonment of any sewer, gas or water main, electrical conduit, or any other public utility facility, and the rights of the owner or owners of any such public utilities to maintain, continue, repair, reconstruct, renew, replace, rebuild, or enlarge any and all such facilities shall be preserved without alteration. No building or structure of any kind shall be built or erected within a distance of ten feet from the center line of any such utility line, except with the written consent of the Department of Public Works of the City of Tigard and of the owner of the utility. Any and all contemplated building plans in the vacated area shall be submitted for approval to the City Department of Public Works , to the end that such construction may be so adjusted with reference to all public utilities in the area as to cause a minimum danger or inconvenience to the public and to the owner of the utilities , and to protect and preserve the same as presently constructed or hereafter reconstructed, renewed, or replaced or enlarged. ORDINANCE NO. 76- �-f BOOK 113.2 PALE 957 Page One. ORDINANCE NO. 76- Page Two. B004132.2 PAGE950 8143 Section 6 ; This ordinance shall become effective on the 30th day following its enactment. PASSED; By unanimous vote of all Council members present, after being read three times by number and title only, this 13th day of December, 1976. Recorder, Cit of Tit , Oregon APPROVED: By the Mayor this 13th day of December, 1976, Mayor, City of Tigard, O egon ORDINANCE NO. 76- BOCK11,�.2 PAGE958 Page Two. 8343 EXHIBIT "A" Beginning at a 5/8" iron rod marking the .Northwesterly corner of Lot 17, Block 1 of Kingston Plat, also being on the easterly right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway West, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon; thence South 45°33116" East 94. 28 feet along the southerly line of Lot 17 to the westerly right-of-way line of S.V,'- Main Street, 40.0 feet from ght angles thereto; thence South 47°57'44' centerline when measured at ri West 46. 19 feet along said westerly right-of-way to a 5/8" iron rod; thence North 41007' 22" West 94. 12 feet to a 5/8" iron rod on the easterly right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway West; thence North 47°57'44" East 38.91 feet to the point of beginning. d - I STATE OF OREGON ) City of Tigard ) I, DORIS HARTIG, hereby certify that I am the duly appointed, qualified, and acting Recorder of the City of Tigard, Oregon. I further certify that I have compared the herewith copy of Ordinance No. 76-51 of the City of Tigard with the original in my possession as custodian of the official records cf the City ofTigard, wholeoOrdinanceNo and that the he6 51 herewith copy is a correct transcript of the IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of the City of Tigard this 15th — day of December 1976 , STATE OF OREd%l � .� County of Washington SS � y.City Rec9- 4rder I, Roger Thomsson, Director of Records � c and Elections and"Ex-Officio Recorder of Con- veyances forsaidcounty, do hereby certify that the within instrument of writing was received and recorded in book of records No. f of said County Witness my hand and seal affixed. ROGER' THOMSSEN, Director of Records & Elections Deputy DEC ZO 9 50 AIM "-16 B00,4132 PACE959 rn A GQ cn o d o m ytij En a !0 Q � O iCD W a i5 : 5: o o � O p CD i m m m o rM7 •CI'L x h p mp ama o 4] O b y i � M ro m �• H -ry cn 00 w � o 'R° o CD CD o i y o Z 0 v, C� _ 0 LQ O r0i, w 'd m i ro ! ID a' SD J (A o ! rL 10 C CD n CD En 0 J2 CD w CD ' !fit `° e CD a w cn �* m � y y A _ / wtl CD 14H C " C CD ro y O w W m n m 03 CD CD i I 0 0 cnEn CDCD o w h i Cfl En k C y OrQ C O+ p a o w w CD a en a a � .;v:`.e.�,.i�.,;'....Vt`tio.V...Q,.a°qo}_,,•:•<.V�3�OP_71.n-.w,h...�7,..,`,,:.;;,,�.mmy�pm+.•,,_,-.�..cGGNsot,-'o._.,„:--ywmpy:,,QeoOAa+-,.ctirom�,:._.eepr,:..,�:=,roc+•..OfOC•qQ-'.._.„_ocrApnr'�,„;.v,,.Or.yC.a+''__.0,o`�►.,4.n'•'..`�yro<s+,':.;x�+..,Ano w t-.h.:;.�A_'HY,.;.,y.Cy.:,Os,p.d'v/.-.m�•fy.yrOr,.eaCSv7..Kr�+__,,..W-,mra�-.`oy,GmC."�'.”� cm.v..<w:,,o�.'.':,m`.',�.".,.eoy-+•':s..rn"r.'.jr. CD' ,..A(D_.:._aG"'j'.:fy7.o,w.,.•-.,..._.QA,:,.: '.,, C3,.;oH woA_CO3:5 boaA. ~ , ,_ ..►O�p�*a e:,,�!,.s.;,ay..O..:.r,r_.A.,�U z: rBCZ E0o°q' rr_ 4: r A) rr 0 "d r+o y 91p » Nawcerer-_',..bmoo m,o;m mo v vo.w.w .rt.-.o w¢..;-,..,Gmome°,,rrwC�m0n..-..;:;y.AAm U4.� 0 .n _aCroGO_7. m"�y.",;-.. .wAowrR(rD*r" 'i9y ai; ONO oO ~»ro 0 p . d � r .�a .m -- m Cm W, o N�,mA.ep pmcD, ,V. O '_O," mwrowOC m,C.0 a_ro - r n:0 C. 0w mm ro w. .rm m.ms mw, wQ _. CD G ro, �. ,m,O ?o C”' CD-"-.(rQ,0 Cb:m"moCDaeC. o o y; mro,Corp .ap vm, a«.t .o(GCOoe-�r. _vrOxp.cn CD OA „r. . : m. .x � o ovm Q .0 .C ro 0 w rov , . _HrAfi :m o ,G ., N HmD0OCD m . oOCoKI .,... m a O:... ,�. O.•. O y, ,. o. „m .. r: !•s.....:.."S: _C, 0'- ;At �•„ „ iv.. ,a_, "`C_:W: �'l:.a ...0�... .: a'r3 .,.�- �C:_ .. m. ”: y,p A;p.O,0` p',A. -, d'u O G. fi+ G .T fir,.... "1 o C•. 04. (D .. ' _ „ y; o o m m. �, °. trl._ a A _ .ro n, :,,co- _ �'; <. taa ►... _x K, a o m, ,ao e+ :X_.- bd o: w a m �. ++G_ a. .A. os re : rr os,w H ro tii $ t C vs . Oq cn - O4 w_ A m w•, m. _ r: C �. -- ...o. oo. ...'G, ,p. eti m.r+, - UC m.. r+ o _, O, O. U1> e r< o.. y m m: o m osm.� .o -r, ": m:. ,, p. , °S. _ _ m y,. .a,,. ._ m o'cD cn A -.�, wY'y. .'vir ^y y .,C s,< t .y N w,00` .,v �. x y oom;, re A" w „m _ - �• on (� 04< V m rr.►e ro_ ... ,..Y ....-= y yb �V"-_.,o' a'°i�: C3; rre C. ,. m ,n m a; rn w ,, . w,m. r, m oo rn C/] oC. +s rr, rr Hn at.. _ e+.. 'C O• ,o O-a... �l,. C=1" O ..: 0 7. ^ *:m el;C rt La , o; _ m w, G O as w w -.v, s , y rr`e P.., ,. ..� o.0 __. .... +�_.. o �._"s w-C o: .. ..,� , .. a.; !es:Q A �s.0-m C ?: m -e� C_C� O C m.: �, - o A.. . .o o v .- y m,. y` m_ ro .s., c _Z70;rr :o _ o w o c_ ... w: o' ..w. .. .00 C (D-, sCs_ fi+ .,... ._ C o:.o. .m: ,. _ fp.,. , CMAD":r ...:..A.. O'•.. _.. _#•. .,,.4_., �- :..... -.a ". .. ,w ,a•ey,,."'1 .„m.. -�':rr A o,_ ;.Hy oa y �.m,,;o� wQ a „ tn..A• w rr _ ... �. m_ C _.ro ►r.snrc m=: ►s= ro'oc }3 -Z' y` ,m".r*.:,.,.CJI :..A ;...m.ori. �"_,'C1 ;A7.:_ a. C.: (D ,: ,..:�,e-'fD,��n;A. to y,�e•+ -.',C '-:N r*: ,"t e*;; Qg, _,_°C..,.... ... ..,r+ -, ._.,�:..C'.0... :-fit ...,., m:.G O, -,e•r _m. ,,, .-,. ,.: -- r+, .:,.+,m..w..,>. ..,,•a :�:�w ,ere. o•e* Oq�:., , ,. �< �. _ a Q.m . . m ate.+ - o .. O mO m= saw .:... - ,. ..- ,i- A H .... v. A.et.:: ,o+w ....+.. rn 'C mom,. a. ."�: ,A..w `i o.. - sv.�-;i`-••"!-_fi1,, o''w A ►~4?:. ....0,." .,,w. _._0':':,ro V.. �r�... :...., to ,b - a,.....,y, r• .w, O ,...o'a., -.x .m_y, .m:y, rr .. �_::. ,.mm .. ,r... 0.,�<..- .:....: m- „,;,fD ° 0-►.•..e-n°CD.. ..rC.,. _ «.-o` ......o;V�r,.. �. max,,.::.:, ;w., _.. : . .rr _,m_ <cn:,- - .�,: ,,:.:.+,,.. ._ , -:,y �'1 .._::p,rr=o,. s> ., .;<m.%w�-.. .: �, ��m._a �C, .O �.,: sou r+m::►s <_. : „O Ib .: A O A__.. w r'T y.fit, d. A1. 'Y. ,a. ._ max ... ,._ _� ..., ,.,,._ W a, ^-.P.!G...>>y C_ ,, .ems•. .�.,.: ., _.-< :*:(D .�; °_, - m �. m ~s_ .V.,;,r. .o : w m'CS o ~n .m_cvc.da ,, ,:fi7...g _ -.:.m ", w :-�".r _�y n"!� -;.....r+.r.�r+,,�, ."!. "'.7 'CS..m...._, .. [A ...' `. _ `Cy'.'- �y'1..... ,.m,- ,... ... .. '3`_. ., w er.. .. G ".,,,.. ,O.m" _ ... .m .i :. O , ,m- :.m,m.: ..O _ ,;,_w :::. -�.. .. ...~n_ ,�* m ' m o. • , y a _ A 'C ma+r G +, v,.w o d, SAS t_ .0.;, r* fi+ • y m.. ... .. =o :A. w., vSD,. _._ fD.'.3 :Mrr G, .:•�, , ,:0 W„.m..fit max ,;;0 .m. - _; ,m ,-. ,x ,rye:, _w. .,<ru. - ,; , -M(D.m, 4 ..,....,. • .�, . c.�,,. r~ ,_.,., a m a w- mF a oo, °.._ Cs, _ _< ,._ m a” O`C o _ o m o"a, b --m o p m �. �..,-, ,,: fi+r r_ y o G �.. _ - . m m o .�e -- o fig; o'n,. +, . oro, m m.fA .. �� .: _rx, ._ � :ry ,_ ~:. w K ,. m. _.x _ y o a A r,,. o y.pa ,,o m m r. _. O.0,.: CD141, ...•. y r+r• O. OS a m a rma O C' O - �,t _ r+ C! r- fix„ M y, .o a ... rr_ a,r+vs. o w:o :, .rr. .o• o. y vo: ,�m ID .O O m CD'(D` CL fn 'O oy a`C , o• p' A: , M "z r r. a w A' m W;m a m- v . :,a e*. 1 Su w mom, - C 'a• m-��C r.;o.;.-r m �' co,_ .�.. �, K ° . C . .., 'v. , ,...- _�s o, _.... m m .G.__. Y _.�w_ « -, ..a� 4W m .. _ _ _. _ .., w �:,; _ ....m:o', . _p. _ oa '�s .. m.. _.� ,m ,.,;.C"md_ ,�, ,� A ...-..•r'�y�o .� � m_. er •e::� O_�P Cf: ,.. . N, .,... ,C fi1.r+y• ,,p•O, n"x maf n: s;,a t C1,,. er - �C ex r+ .G:<.O 0" O . C mat_ er v ;.A�d 0 m. C;m, w., �. ...,.t ,.,. m tsx s._ - tU�m.: ... .e+,O p•, rr m-�+ ,„ A o, m, w <?m• .:y .y. _ �. O y p• v0 cD- A, w O., r+,.. -: -n ....: m", :rr - ,O w.: ._ _.: :, , P�o C •x.. ;x .. fit. .''.o .. =• .er: ;d', ;. ..„ rr ,rA w, m O C A�, s' A:'C3 C A z. -;y �.re :.M ., o. .. _ C" ,, _ ,ma'3 • _, , A=C1. O.:ro , :' ,' tDi .`.3.' m C.Q•m"x: �"'�=m=rr CO` . ,m o,. :o,,.. m m;,., O, ,A tet_._, O._, ;,...!-nn o. ".,y O gyp_.,, _ , �f,m .m C. A fig. C" m_ `C' O,CD C : ,. ,,P „ .�-+ODM, ,p.,. .1 , C''O. A : ,m.. m .. '�S'..W r+,<p z ;A , :w C',. ,m_ 0- C2 .,,..�., iY, .Ai.�.:.� p• ,,a.tp., w,:..... ,t�+:... .m ,,; , ,o ..., tD-. .f1i.W -M".'t::. , im. w:_e-e•.".3 .:�-.H ._;:. ,to o.. .._ ma. zn__ as G cn _ .- m , o . b ro y .. rr, .. _ m _ �.ro __ r,.m:�*,c-._p' ow ' �t,.M, 0 O y.. .:' ,y ,°, a a fir. . O O. �+ .�• .. A m, o� r+Q w CV"' vt? rma, ro:0 ' lU y.. . ,, w 0`C; _rfit_ = ym 'y ° C< Y„ QQ a _ C, 'C3.. •'7,<. °"�.yy m _- rti .fr �-• p'A>,0 O t-+w a+ o[ .rr <, m;o'' 'Cf (� _Sayd:._._:� _ rr 4 m. o;�, cD 0. .;;o'ma..y,y, <., :•o:< '� m m. ... ..G. m m, s w• ..' y 0Q V+ -a.r a O.i y:fn. C,eC fD Cr, n.A.G _rr_ e+ r+ s m O e+ p� _ m w,-� m,t,C . ,aO a,, m:°C;in m O:o..O�O ro :.G m`C;m. ...�'*-.`f ....0 C-:,'.7 y _ M •�Y�`S,•m"P),"p•0 ,,..aq m !-n ., o CITY OF T'IGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION No. 76-q_ A RESOLUTION CONCERNING VACATION OF A PORTION OF DEDICATED UNOPENED STREET AND/OR ALLEY WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION OF "KINGSTON", CITY OF TICAR.D, WASHINGTON COUNTY , OREGON. tiliERFAS, the area described on the attached sheet, designated Exhibit "A", and by this reference made a part hereof, is part of a dedicated, oi.cned street and/or alley in the "Kingston" Subdivision within the corpo!ate limits of the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the said lands have not at any time served a public purpose and are so situated as to be of no usefulness now or in the future as part of the public street system of the City; and WHEREAS, it appears to be in the public interest that the said area be vacated and restored to the tax rolls and made available for development and use by the adjoining property owners to whose lands the same, if vacated, would attach; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 271. 130 ORS the City Council may initiate vacation proceedings as authorized in Chapter 271 ORS without a petition or consent of the property owners and may otherwise conduct such proceedings in accordance with said chapter, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Tigard, as follows: (1) "That a public hearing is hereby called to be held by the City Council of Tigard on Monday, December 13, 1976 at Fowler Junior High School within the City of Tigard, beginning at 8:00 P.M. , at which time and place the Council shall hear any objections thereto, and any interested person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed vacating of said lands. (2) "That the City Recorder be, and she is hereby, authorized and directed to cause to have published in the Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Tigard hereby designated for such purpose, a notice of said hearing in the form hereto attached and by this reference :,-.;a-de a part hereof, the first publication to be made on the 18th day of November, 1976, and once each week thereafter for four pubiishings in all. "The Recorder be, and she is hereby, further directed to cause to have posted -within five (5) days after the date of first publication, a copy of said notice in the form hereto attached, at or near each end of the area(s) proposed to be vacated, and in addition, the Recorder shall post a copy of said notice in at least two (2) conspicuous places within the area(s) proposed to be vacated, all of said postings to be accomplished within the time herein stated. (3) "That the particular portions of dedicated street and/or alley proposed to be vacated are described on the attached sheet headed Exhibit "A" and by this reference made a part hereof." PASSED: This �? day of �;�- �_r _, 1976. Mayor ATTEST: /J y City Record r r� g EXHIBIT "A" Beginning at a 5/8" iron rod marking the Northwesterly corner of Lot 17, Block 1 of Kingston Plat, also being on the easterly right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway West, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon; thence South 45°33' 16" East 94. 28 feet along the southerly line of Lot 17 to the westerly right-of-way line of S.W. Main Street, 40.0 feet from centerline when measured at right angles thereto; thence South 47057'44" West 46. 19 feet along said westerly right-of-way to a 5/8" iron rod; thence North 41007'22" West 94. 12 feet to a 5/8" iron rod on the easterly right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway West; thence North 47°57'44" East 38.91 feet to the point of beginning. From: "Bill Monahan" <FINANCE/BILL> To: FINANCE/27047 Date sent: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 15:44:37 +0000 Subject: Pine Street I suggest that you contact Mike Marr, chair of the Downtown merchants group, and suggest that we docket this for an upcoming meeting of the group. Perhaps you could attend to advise them that you have discovered that the city aparently owns the land and it could become available for public parking. I suggest that the group should invite the owners of Southwest Office Supply, the Savory's, to the meeting as they may assert an ownership interest. In fact, I suggest that you contact John Savory and tell him in advance that you have been looking into this and your findings to date show that the city owns the land but they are posting it as if they own it. Does he have any information and documentation that he can provide that can help you to complete your analysis. By the way, I have been discussing the issue that Dee brought to my attention a couple weeks ago assuming that "Pine" was the name of that land. Now I note that Pine is up in the Metzger area and I am drawing a blank on what the issue is. Please remind me of the issue as I apparently am talking about something entirely different from your research. 6��: - v E"� nrn',�' 88-09628 Washliroton County i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON �C. ORDINANCE NO. 86-_q- - r AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF SW PINE STREET (ADJACENT TO SW MAIN STREET NEAR SW OFFICE SUPPLY) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council initiated this vacation request pursuant to Section 15.08.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the reason and purpose for this vacation is to return the street right-of-way to the property owner to allow for an upgrade to the parking area currently in existence; and WHEREAS, the vacation is recommended by the Planning Commission and the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, in accordance with ORS 271.100, and TMC Section 15.08.110, the Council fixed a time and place for the public hearing and the Recorder published notice and posted notice in the area to be vacated; and WHEREAS, notice has been mailed to all property owners abutting said vacation area and 01 owners in the affected area, as described in ORS 271.080; and WHEREAS, the Council, having held a hearing on October 13, 1986, finds the public interest will not be prejudiced by the vacation as provided by ORS 271.120 and TMC Section 15.08.130; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is in the public interest to approve the requast to vacate the street right-of-way area because the public interest will not be prejudiced; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that the following conditions are necessary to vacate said land: 1. Property owners adjoining the area to be vacated shall provide the City Recorder with a mutual access and maintenance agreement. This agreement shall include a legal description and map of the access area. The complete agreement shall be recorded with Washington County upon approval of the City Attorney and Engineering Division. The adjoining owners may propose an alternative to mutual access, however, any alternative must meet the approval of the Development Services Division (Building, Planning, and Engineering). 2. That an easement for public utility purposes be retained over ' the following portions of the area to be vacated: a. The northeasterly twenty feet extending from SW Pacific Highway to SW Main Street. ORDINANCE NO. 86� ? h1�� 4.1 Page 1 CIT1' RECORDBIC lw/4099A CITY OF TIGARD 1 _� p• O• BOX 23397 MOARD,OR 97223 xt b. The northwesterly five feet adjoining the SW Pacific Highway right-of-way and extending from the northeasterly right-of-way line to the southwesterly right-of-way of SW Pine Street. 3. A traffic circulation plan shall be submitted by the adjoining �Yr property owners And approved by the Engineering Division. Said Plan shall address ingress and egress on S. W. Main Street and y� possibly on S. W. Commercial Street if State Highway + right-of-way behind existing buildings is to be utilized. s`? 4. A permit from the State Highway Division, if their right-of-way is utilized, shall be required. A copy shall be provided to the Engineering Division. r 5. Existing parking in area shall not be reduced without approval of the City Council. 6. The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of r this ordinance; Conditions 1, 2, 3 and 4 above are complied with; and a certified copy of this ordinance has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk, Assessor, and Surveyor. ;F THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Tigard City Council hereby orders the vacation of that portion {_ of SW Pine Street (adjacent to SW Main Street) as described on the attached Exhibit "A" and shown on the attached Exhibit "B", and by this reference made parts hereof. <, Section 2: The Tigard City Council further orders that the vacation be ?: subject to the following conditions: 1. Property owners adjoining the area to be vacated shall provide the City Recorder with a mutual access and maintenance agreement. This agreement shall include a legal description and map of the access area. The complete agreement shall be rrecorded with Washington County upon approval of the City Attorney and Engineering Division. The adjoining owners may propose an alternative to mutual access, however, any alternative must meet the approval of the Development Services Division (Building, Planning, and Engineering). 2. That an easement for public utility purposes be retained over t the following portions of the area to be vacated: `t a. The northeasterly twenty feet extending from SW Pacific Highway to :W Main Street. b. The northwesterly five feet adjoining the SW Pacific Highway right-of-way and extenditin from the northeasterly right-of-way line to the southwesterly right-of-way of SW Pine Street. ORDINANCE NO. 86- Page 2 lw/4099A 2 3. A traffic circulation plan shall be submitted by the adjoining property owners and approved by the Engineering Division. Said Plan shall address ingress and egress on S. W. Main Street and possibly on S. W. Commercial Street if State Highway right—of—way behind exixting buildings is to be utilized. 4. A permit from the State Highway Division, if their right—of-A•Jay is utilized, shall be required. A copy shall be provided to the Engineering Division. 5. Existing parking in area shall not be reduced without approval ? of the City Council. t: 6. The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this ordinance; Conditions 1, 2, 3 and 4 above are complied with; and a certified copy of this ordinance has been recorded k with the Washington County Clerk, Assessor, and Surveyor. Section 3: In no situation shall this ordinance be effective until the 315t ,r day after its enactment by the City Council and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By (Ane-,-n VY)rtLILS vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this _f aT-- day Y of 1986. , Loreen R. Wilson, Acting Recorder APPROVED: This �-�'H day of �c'tc:�.. 1986. Cook, Mayor f�.w+ 4STATE OF OR6GON, ) kje �Ceun-jj. of 114astiinc ton ) !: Cfty .of J-1garci ) N r �`r I;•dA-rHCd kE WHEATLEY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I am the duly appointed, qualified and ad'ting'beputy City Recorder of the City of Tigard, Oregon. fi I further certify that I have compared the herewith copy of ORDINANCE NO. J(o"L(el of the City of Tigard with the original in my possession as custodian of the official records of the City of Tigard, and that the herewith copy is a correct transcript of ORDINANCE NO. -� r IN WITNTS5 WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal of the City of Tigard this 15 day of /rA-'L�_ Deputy City Recorder a It 11 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PINE STREET VACATION (ADJACENT TO SW MAIN STREET) Y That portion of SW Pine Street in Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon described as follows: '. . Beginning at a point on the southerly right-of-way line of SW Pacific Highway (49W), South 47051'44" West, 38.91 feet from the northwestarly corner of Lot 17, Block 1, Kingston, a recorded plat, Washington County plat racords; thence South 47051'44" West, 11.18 feet to a point; thence North 45P33'16" West, 5 teat; thence South 53013157" West on said highway right-of-way, 38.54 feat; thence South 41°07'22" East, 102.65 feet to a point on the northerly lino of SW Main Straej; thence North 47°57'44" East 50 feat on said northerly. line; and thence North 41°07'22" West, 94.12 fent to the point of beginning. '1s �t ' 1 Y f I ,t i f COMNj/��/02 w Olk COU LD N f �• `\\ k \ 4 \ r � 4• �T!s .moi \\\ � \ O a `\ M l , A 14 Q / \ L l Y b •2 a g C ''�� anti N 41 Pre in 4 lb ' � 4'�i�'� ,�' � \• �\ ' ��b4d+�y�^t �}t J a •y •1 SQA• \ • y` w �Q. cam+ 1+ A y, LLJ 4 7 Q Y '\ \4 't 'j_/• f ••! • ✓ yam {` ,d �S `1'. �' moi••+ \ A, 0 • . `'' r �n 2 't ,4Y`• •• �,• CO = STATE OF OREGON ) SS ^ 'tet County of Washington r `y,.'•. x: ,.y Y/ / Z �� ./ 1.Donaid W Mason.Director u!As„sssrnenl '"''ti+rt'e• z• Taxation and Ex-, Records.d Con- and veyancns toe said nowty,do hereby cemtV That { the watrn msth~ d w"" WAS received 1 , and recorded in book of recrxdc o1 sad Canty. CERTIFIED TO BE A TRUE AND Donald W Mason D"cta of Aseesamnnt and Taxaion• E■• CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL OtkDOCO%X*Clwk Date: JERRY R. HANISOf; (RECTOR 1111 MAR-9 PH 2145 paitment o se ent & Taxation By n� G ARCHIVE RETRIEVAL FORM L i DATE STAMP HERE G I DOCUMENT NAME: • ;;` �ee�Vz`z�`°"``" a" ✓' � . • 7.1' IN� PK IC .. ARCHIVE DISK NAME (If available): ;. LOCATION TO BE ARCHIVED TO:ram i'vk t, DRIVE PARENT SUBDIRECTORY DATE & TIME REQUIRED: A SI`� AM PM DATE TIME AUTHOR/DEPT: r SDr- z�� Sc.) -x".11 S� . # 55 &Zcc 'scuMz,K 8 3 S.W. oF�« Su PPI y r i 400, I -Z-Z455,w Mzh r,r i ' ZSl-ZA:Z 9- 3701 V V � _- �,- Z 5! 2A6 S3ao 530( J 12 AO SA 3/3S ah99O 915_. �\ 91�1 - 70o1165 \ \ \ CANCELLED TAX LOTS0 d 'N" 10 RD . 900,2700,J91O' N87 "E 1 l 100,200,250 0 , 124.22 800,5590,5690,3800,1100 , 2880,2690,2900,3000,V- 916 4 \ i 3200,2600,1202, 4001, 909 np 10 i 20 ;e17 ss'°, , \y h ` 9 9 s \ \ s� h ch 18 "s °?' \ / . ., y 91 T 7 w 9.0 9 g�1 �aii ti 19 918 0 >d \ g`°� 919ay. o \ \ svo 5 \ \ SEEM�P 2S 2 AA a• 5a h / / a S.No. ' °oaf q, 13283) 3700-0'\\ vo`hX�� 2 3600 °< c i a h i� so / \b0 G S j X o \O FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY GX' DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE \ �y I.l_, 37O0...1ZZ45 s.c,v. Haig ST. �0o SEE MAP 2 .0Qc , NW COR 4.75 /BAc. .m �e� 2S 1 2 A A 1 J0�9 '' p 14n36 4100 o 1°• ,<, .094C. \ �J04300 ' s46Ac. OA c. r v� �Q 00 5302 e� .56 Ac. °s 0, � S„ y . 900 10 �!, x 2 1+ 6 2 2001 rr — ,2000 Aw 100 14 \�\ \�5��?' \� d 200e9�� / x 15 24 25 . �,� AFo,55 16 1t \ 5100 Vis° \ 17 \ 3f '� }t 23 �Gj�ehti_}G' a�p1 903 h6e9 2 s\ 6t3' '� x �1 .43Ac. \ 2 � � 5,200 — 2 l c. �:+�j 1 4 AW 0020 ry / r 11 / 5300 �` � 2301 sp \a/0 \\C. \ \\ 19 '084 AW /`� .43 Ac '°r 5500ti �� F 11 `JO }I ` \ ?0 1 A, p VERMt2302 \ 17 \ h / �! .26 Ac xp \ �► (C.S-N O.12264) (C-S.NoJ2263) ° 4000 'y°�J o° 2300 2400 e t� .17A a1` .22 Ac. 41 2 \ x •• \ ?°p 3 5 S e e C.S.10734 G — '�� \ •o° 2501o ./7Ac. \ Q o po 0 25 vo Yi\�° 0 3 QoX �°��9e r \ r�52AC.� tk C, 4100 90 y 1 '9ytT \ 5a� 2 6c M60h .72 Ac. °s 9 O y9po \ `ao .22A r 31 �E �E GP 90 b S42°52�W 1359.1 S `gyp Q N45°124 1191.3 h E pJo pF/ Y .FROM RE-ENTRANT\ 4900 '�• 1/ / CORNER F - RIICHARDSON O.OLC.38 \ °° ° r \ 27 eo .45Ac. \ \ s a� 5 3 946o c/ 2.003Ac. / / 26 / J 4800 sy / V 4201 ° A O' 1 Q / (C.S. No. 12991) �O ��/l �''�1_ ap / ' 4 1 1 4801-M I %4 A IAN 322 \ti °p � J �,� �° 3903 F / 015 04 CITY OF TIGARD 01/03/1996 Search Cross-Reference/Keyword Database 8 : 25 : 50 Document Item Action Reference Date Ref . Code Brief Description AG 08/04/1972 SDEDA PINE STREET - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Keywords . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PINE STREET VERMILYE DOHERTY 7711 08/04/72 STREET DEDICATION AGREEMENT File Reference # . . . . . . Security Class . . . . . . . . : Retention Code : 152 Expiration Date . . . . . . . : ***** Inactive ***** Date for Cont/Referred: Name Referred to. . . . . . : Press F4 to Update F7-Return F3-Check Out F9-Retention ESC-End Press F10 to Continue F8-Abstract Yes No F5-WP Yes No (c) 1986-1995 Munimetrix Systems Corp. From: "John Hagman" <FINANCE/JOHNH> To: James Date sent: Fri, 12 Jan 1996 16:44:36 +0000 Subject: Parking problem at Main Street/SW Office Supply Copies to: Dee Am quite sure that the "authority" enabling public parking on private land(SW Office Supply's private parking lot) was derived through non-remonstrance agreements obtained by the City via two land use actions (final orders). Unfortunately, we do not seem to be able to recover said agreements. "Records" (Dee) is putting together a file for all of the data that we did find thereinregard. Sorry that I cant be of more help to you but, I find Ive no other road left to follow. A�j Z `� I I �t�-cam ��. TWO � �Q-S '`�C r �►`�� C��. '�.C'_ c � N u n l it aB_o C. nw)►O'CeA 4 ilk �V b�ra\�L- Ayr V�� k V�C rvt' `I't�iWlE7VlS "LV�C L- �'iWLPr� S ��M AFP _T f u►r b � c� `ac -�,�s� z C_ atiS te 1 l SIA, VIA 1/1,v\�a r��ave .�: �vv W�.� fin. l d•��s> 25 FINAL ACTION STAFF REPORT SITE DESIGN REV't4 TIGARD PLANNING Jrr4ti':?2E..�i 12755 SW Ash :v--. Tigard, Oregon 97223 DOCKET: Site DesiXn Review SDR 6-63 NYU ♦ 1 APPLICANT: David B, b Mary Savory OWNER: Same Rt 5 box 2690 Newberg, Oregon 97132 SITE LOCATION: 12245 S.W. Main St. (Wash. Co. lax Map 2S1 2AB lot 3700). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: CBD ZONING DESIGNATION; C-3M i i RFOIIFI;T- ve.Nign keview to construct a' 1"j0f; o.j. it , addition for v:ttces to an existing 3800 sq. ft. retail outlet. BACKGROUND/PREVIOU`, ACI ION: None SITE PLAN/DESIGN REVIEW: The applis•ant is proposing to construct a 1600 sq. ft. addition to the existing 3800 sq. ft. space. The addition consists of approximately 400 feet to be added to the back of the existing space and approximately 1300 sq. ft. to be added to a second story over the rear of thou building. the site plan meets the setback requirement for the side and rear, however, the existing building does not meet the ten toot front yard setback requirement. The front of the building iu at the property line. The parking requiremnt for this site is 14 spaces. There are no spaces shown on the site plan, however, there are four spaces in front of the site on Main Street and five spaces perpendicular to the east side of the building that may be used for the site. The TURA Advisory ;n reviewing the downtown parking situation has rPrrmmvn,4dr4 . y __.,g di::1.r -_ ...; -al 'Lc- ,,r centrally located downtown parking be established. Staff feels that it would be appropriator to require the applicant to sign a non remonstrance agreement against t:ie formation of a downtown parking district. Access to the site is from SW Main Street which is improved to current city standards. The applicant has not submitted a landscape and irrigation plan. No site drainage plans were submitted with the application. t STAFF RECOMMENDATION: it Staff recommender approval of SDR 2-83 with the following condition: 1. The property owner shall sign a non remonstrance agreement against the formation of a downtown parking district. j I,I it I PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: 611 6 Eli beth A. Newton I r 4illiam A. Monahan Associate Planner Director of Planning 6 Development 1 a a I i J I i r G v Ili 1� L� I Y- F STAFF REPORT SDR 6-83 Page 2 +, '' t -3( KINGSTON ,�. � -, • ,5 ctJ Oil i F/G /r�k�S'. /2/C�- b O 5 fio/� pod 'p r 00 r/c ov ti 114 •c a O ,IL0 1 a.Mt- 46. 13 e 3.er •` S y/ /"1A/A1 STREET w , I `7"/L'• 4000 I i i TI GA RD TRACTS f-Y ,vilkk % ,4' f ► 4. 10.4E % U"" � �� July 2, 1985 Cff(*TWAP WASFNN01pN MAM,OREGON Mike Russell 3711 NE Alameda Portland, Oregon 97212 RE: Completion of conditions of approval - Health Habit (SDR 23-85) Dear Mike: I am writing this letter to establish a deadline for completing the remaining conditions of approval. In the fall of last year, the City and Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District agreed to allow the opening of Health Habit with the understanding that the remaining Fire Code and site development conditions would be promptly resolved. Though we have been moving towards completion of these items, the tasks listed below still remain: 1. Closure of the western driveway to Main Street. 2. Striping the parking lot as shown in the approved plan dated April 24, 1985. 3. Signs approved by the Engineering Division which direct vehicles on the site. 4. Submission of a landscaping plan for the strip between the parking area and the sidewalk and installation landscaping material after Planning Director approval. 5. Installation of two bicycle rack spaces. 6. Installation of necessary fire exits to meet Code requirements. If you have any questions regarding this list please contact Randy Clarno on items 1, 2, and 3; Ed Walden regarding item 6; and myself for number 4 and 5. The City will expect completion or substantial progreuo ,e made on each of the above items by July 15, 1983. If compliance is not achieved, the City will be forced to take the appropriate steps within its legal authority to revoke the right to temporary occupancy and require compliance with the above conditions prior to any further occupancy of the building. A certificate of occupancy will not be issued until all conditions are met. 12755 S.W. ASH P 0 BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639.4171 It is our intent to cooperate with you in meeting these conditions but we oust insist that they be resolved by July 15, 1985. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, — Keith S. Liden Senior Planner — cc: Bldg. Inspector _ Engineering Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District (KSL:cz/1554P) r s 1"SYR R1 f„*IF { T j a vit pg V 5 f�{t 1 b�" � �► _ LL ¢ u f p 'Alf WE Ij - g S e hX E (.jetp Or� T ilk" tit on 1 nil 6, 1 z - fk a r - ' Y # A + 'Moo �. lid oil ANA fi 1 iE Qa irk { 'ai t f offM fop"" } vi r r rnr pyt at, i L Y fr yk � r t� WT, i RM 1 M- ~ V r� ua LL CL2 o J �. ae- w ev r I CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 23-84 APPLICATION: Request by Hobart Vermilye for Site Development Review approval to allow the renovation of an existing building to accomodate a fitness facility, and sports medicine clinic, on property zoned CBD (Central Business District) and located at 12215 SW Main Street, Tigard, (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AA, Tax Lot 5500). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described applications subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. _ A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background Previous land use cases have not been reviewed on this property. 2. Vicinity Information The property is located within downtown Tigard and alp •F the surrounding properties are also zoned CBD. Pacific Highway is on the north side of the property and commercial uses are to the east, south, and west. The U.S. Post Office is directly across the street. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description Until recently, the building on the property has been used as a furniture store. The building is approximately 9400 square feet in size and the reminder of the 16,630 square foot property consists of seven parking spaces and several landscaped areas. The applicant proposes to convert the building into a physical fitness facility including weight lifting, aerobics, karate, and a - sports medicine clinic. The exterior of the building including the existing signs will not be materially altered and the present landscaping and parking layout will remain unchanged. In addition to the on-site parking spaces, seven public ,parking spaces are _ available in front of the building on Main Street. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division recommends that the applicant should provide a traffic circulation plan, prepared by an engineer with _ traffic certification, for on-site and off-site traffic movement. This study is warranted because of the existing congestion associated with the Post Office across the street and the intensification in traffic that will be associated with the new g use. The study should address the problem of turning movements on 1 Main Street and the access to and from the parking lot. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 23-84 - PAGE 1 LMw Y i i The Building Inspection Office indicates that the non-conforming roof sign biM,uld be removed as a condition of approval. No comments have been received from the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District . NPO #1 has no objection to the proposal but noted that the proposal did not appear to meet parking and landscaping requirements. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposal is consistent with the intent of the CBD zone. The existing building will not be altered on the exterior and the use proposed complies with the zone. The major issues which require further discussion relate to traffic circulation, parking, landscaping and signage. I. Traffic Circulation As noted the Engineering Division, there is the potential for serious conflicts and congestion problems due to the Post Office and the health club driveway locations. The purpose of the traffic study proposed by the Division will be •o determine the nature of the problem once the health club is established and to Identify any necessary modifications that would be warranted to maintain acc.•ptable traffic flow on Main Street. 2. Parking Based upon Code requirements, 31 parking spaces are necessary to verve the type and size of facility proposed. The Main Street area is a unique situation because of the existing development and the physical constraints that exist in relation to parking. The City policy for meeting the intent of the parking requirements for developed properties that are being remodeled, is to require the installation of as many on-site parking spaces as possible and a non-remonstrance agreement for the formation of a public parking facility. - The site plan indicates that seven parking spaces are available on the property. It appears that at least two additional spaces could be placed on the property. A revised site plan illustrating property liner and parking spaces should be prepared. This site plan should include an adequate method for ingress and egress. 1 The Code requires one secure bicycle rack space for every 15 required car spaces. Two bicycle spaces should be provided near the entrance of the building and should be shown on the site pian i noted above. - fi NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 23-84 - PAGE 2 - i t I' 3 . Landscaping 1 The Code provided that landscaping on 20 percent of the property area is nec4<ssAry. However, the intent of this section of the Code was pr14-rily to apply to existing development in the CHD Zone. This prr,posal will not causrr the removal of any of the established lar.dt(,dping which includes a number of planting areas and several trees. A portion of the existing parking or the building would have to be removed in order to landscape 20 percent of the property 4. Signs The building has three signs associated with it . The applicant intends to taep the existing signs and change the faces to advertize the nt•w use. The signs conform with the Code except for the roof sign. chis type of sign is not allowed in any zoning district of the City . The Cr/de provides that signs in existence before January, 1971, that. are not consistent with present requirements yholl be removed . C. DECISION The Planning Director approves the SDR 23- 84 subject to the following conditions: w 1 . UNLESS OTHFKWISF NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL 81 MET PRIOR 10 i ISSUANCE OF AN (X:0JPANCY PERMIT. 2. Joint use and nw,intenance agreements shall be recorded for Al (,_mrv_rn driveways and copies of the recorded document(s) stall be submitted to the Planning Director. 3. A revised site plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval with the following changes: a. Additional parking spaces (as feasible) shall be provided. b. Property lines. ' C. A minimum of two bicycle rack spaces including rack design 4. A traffic circulation plan for on-site and off-site traffic " movements shall be prepared by d certifi4•d traffic engineer. Said plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director c (Frank Currie) . 5. A City of Tigard approved non-remonstrance agreement for a y downtown public parking facilities shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for review and subsequent City Council approval before an occupancy permit is issued or before a change ; in cu.nership. W 6. ";hz existing roof sign shall he removed, including all support structures. � w 7. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 23--84 - PAGE 3 D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant 6 owners X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies r 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON October 15, 1984 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance ;+:.th Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be fil-d a,'A: the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. October 15, 1984 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of f Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. i William A. Monahan, Director of Planning 6 Development DATE APPROVED (KSL:cz/0694) I II NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 23-84 - PAGE 4 T ,. f.lf 4eaPue naia.ee s i I NOTE TO THE FILE FROM: i RE: z��Ly�A`i A�1L5� r• FILE: � iL ��•-�y DATE: 12/L`t 1�7 c�z- C-�U�T�J G� (►J Fo Q.l�G,T��tJ RGL�AR.�I►�(, � �� _ r CnYUF TWARD v#SM R4GMN GOIMY,OREGON NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION 1. The final decision was filed by: Director of Planning b Development Concerning SDR 6-83 on — May 12. 1983 Case N:jmber Date 2. Name of Owner: David and Mary Savury 3. Name of Applicant: Same Address Rt. 5 Box 2690 City Newberg, State Or. 4. Location of Property: Address 12245 S.W. Main St. Legal Description 2S1 2AB lot 3700 5. Nature of Application: Site Design Review to construct a 1600 sa. ft. addition to an existing 3800 sq f[ retail outlet. 6. Action: u Approval as requested CJ Approval wii,li ,,orioitions Denial 7. Notice: *Notice was published in the newspaper & ::as mailed to: XX The applicant & owners DXX Owners of record within the required distance (YY i The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization El Affected governmental agencies *If there are questions regarding the names of the persons or agencies who received notice, this information is available at the Planning Department. 6. Filial The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be obtained from the Planning Director, City of Tigard, City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. .n the case of a decision on an application for a variance, the applicant must acknowledge this form and return it to the City of Tigard, Planning Director, before any building permits will be issued or engineering approval given. Signature of Applicant or Applicant's Agent Date i; �? 9. Appeal: An appeal (�—� has been filedEA has not been filen. E �_J Note: Any party to the decision may app. 31 t: ii decision in accordance ; I. with Section 18.84.250, which provides !hat, a ►:ritten appeal may be filed within fourteen days after notice is given and sent. i. Notice is given on May 13, 1983 therefore the deadline ,I jl for filing of an appeal is May 27, 1983 Y10. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639-4171 . ;Iia SLI 1 I1 1 ' i �fl ;i IVi � i 1f ( �i :GI Ia,y t !f .i G > j yi ,i t i f ' t ' I f FINAL ACTION STAFF REPORT i SITE DESIGN REVIEW TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 12755 SW Ash Ave. Tigard, Oregon 97223 DOCKET: Site Design Review SUR 6-83 NPO 1 APPLICANT: David S. b Mary Savory OWNER: Same Rt 5 Box 2690 Newberg, Oregon 97132 SITE LOCATION: 12245 S.L.. Main St. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AB lot 3700). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: CBD ZONING DESIGNATION: C-3M REQIJFST: For a Site Design Review to construct a 1600 sq. ft. nddi* ic.n car offices to ar, existing 3800 sq. ft. retail outlet. BACKGROUND/PREVIOUS ACTION: None SITE PLAN/DESIGN REVIEW: The applicant is proposing to construct a 1600 sq. ft. addition to the existing 3800 sq. ft. space. The addition consists of approximately 400 feet to be added to the back of the existing space and approximately 1300 sq. ft. to be added to a second story over the rear of the building. The site plan raeets the setback requirement for the side and rear, however, the existing building does not meet the ten foot front yard setback requirement. The front of the building is at the property line. The parking requiremnt for this site is 14 spaces. There are no spaces shown on the site plan, however, there are four spaces in front of the site on Main Street and five spaces perpendicular to the east side of the building that may be used for the site. The TURA Advisory Committee in reviewing the downtown parking situation has recommerlled that a parking district to allow for centrally lccated downtown parking be established. Staff feels that it would be appropriate to require the applicant to sign a non remonstrance agreement against the formation of a downtown parking district. Access to the site is from SW Main Street which is improved to current city standards. The applicant has not submitted a landscape and irrigation plan. No site drainage plans were submitted with the application. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: L Staff recommends approval of SDR 2-83 with the following condition: The property owner .shall sign a non remonstrance agreement against the formation of a downtuwn parking district. i i PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: r L. Eli beth A. Newton liam A. Manahan Associate Planner Director of Planning b Development r r t i i STAFF REPORT SDR 6-83 Page 2 TrF,. II `i Place under City of Tigard Logo SITE DESIGN REVIEW SDR 6-83 SOUTHWEST OFFICE SUPPLY NPO U 1 A request for a Site Design Review to add approximately 1600 sq. ft . of office �= space to an existing 3800 sq. ft. retail outlet. The property is designated CBD and is zoned C3M. Located at : 12245 S.W. Main St. (Wash Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AB lot 3700) . f Written comments are encouraged, please submit any correspondence in advance of May 5, 1983 to the Planning Director - Tigard City Hall - 12755 S.W. Ash - ; � Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone 639-4171. TT publish 4-14-83 / f '7 F CITYOF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON it ;i Ii i'cil " e;f" OF CIG! <.:�, 11155 k r„i, , k'c, fi,,x. ! 1197 Cl' Cigar.l , Ure}: n 97223 t� FOR :AAFr 11ol., t)'JLY : { 1 . G F M1 h:itA 1. I N F U t<Nr\'CIU:+ �\ t I)ROPERT�' A,�I�: F:SS 1224 .� ._i�l. :•lain i r'� , ii ard , irewon---9=2 - E° LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 3700 - j INTERl;AL PROt:E:SSM: Accepted for Pre-App. : M SITE: SIZE (2300 6F- PROPERTY Ow:�ER/DEED IiOLDER* David j . do Nary �ayor� BY: ADDRESS ttt. j 3oX 2E9C _ — -PHU!�E- -- - Pre-App. . CITY Newberg Grez Zfi'�Zj2_ _ T - �` U a t e b 7i, 1 YIiOtiE - ;i�llI:ES5 ,�; � � � k • r ' � Accepted for lk.ctsion. F � CITY 'LIP.__, -_ t, BY: *where [he owner and the applicant are different people , the applicant :rust be the purchaser of record or a 1- as�re in Hearing Date : ' possessior. wit:: ,mitten Ituth;:,riz,itio;', from the owner ur an at;e^[ of C!,e cr»ner with written .,uc!,orization. lie ar:ng' reset To: authorization :rust be submitted with this applic.cciU;;. 2 . REQUIRED LETTER OF AUTHORIZAT10N IS ATTACHED YE'S © NO Ikcision: filed b mailed 3. THIS APPLICATION INVOLVES ME FOLI.OWING: r;PI'• Accepted for Appeal: =, FEE F'11.E1) PAID Comprehensive Plan Amendment from_ to BY' quasi-judicial --- legislative _ Data of Hearing: Zone Change from to - quasi-jud is is 1 legislative DESCRIPTION: ;I Planned Unit Ik>velopmen[ -_- I Co:np. Plan Designation: concept plan detailed plan Subdivision NPO No. f i 1!a or Partition _-- __- 1/,lnor Partitiun -- - -- ---� ZoninK District -�-_- ik'si};n Review Zoning; Map No. - Conditional Use Variance to l-on ing Ord inancc — -26-1-2aP -== -f� _-_.___.__ ("Citi,• 1S) --- -------_-_. �.`-- � �u.�rtcr aectcon tlo. Vari:,nce to Subdivision Ord. - -- --- -_ !' (Ti t Ie 17) �- ''TAFF NOTES: SensitIvo Laud Permit F l o Ch1 pia ins __—_-- Drainagcwaes _ - -~ Steep Slopes -- r___- Othe r __-_ { �1 M N April 4 , 1983 It is the intention of owner to constuct an addition to back of building in order to avoid the need for commuting from current rented space remote from the store building The space under reconstruction will be used for offices and storage. pr:. I s., a•x.m}•qe,e ..,f...,..,,•.4n, .«..._;...;ren7'H'""R.,I'r•"�.r„v,,._..-,,,r..._v:�,,;lv.v ,n vw. l�( - t 1 r t C '-!'t. N:A'p Yr•111' )t,:t Y IN+ V A1.1, 'rl N I?V /'111-`,1•: I'll'I.`1I Y"I:,, 7'hi,r a ti hnreinaller calls greinhrr, t„r tt,r onsnfrrati n her, alter r .•/, d<>rn hrn•hy grunt bart,nin, •ell nrni iorl'ry unto PA”1US1,'VORY t rrcinnitrr rnlM� arae C r. r f t 1 v i 1 ire :rt.++un orad n•sign+ 1,11 (It thnf certain rent Ivr,1 arty aid, tIM to 7C C;r flee (IC rr(Itnrnrn(+ ri'_l f�f 1 .rfrnrrr,�f ell,rrurlt<) Ur1r+flging ur Ill nr;)Wife nl)f,+'Ita,flil�g.•",411ad In the C' rif)' „( Stili:. !`:Coil i ! pry„n. de cell v/ ns folluas, to wit T.ots 1 and 2, Block 3, KING"Tc)N, an,11 that portion of Lot 3, Block 3, Washington County, Oregon that l:.es iithin the following deac>c,bcd tract: Beginning at tele most Southerly corner of Lot 3; thence Northeasterly �) � • across the Northwesterly portion of Lots 1 and 2 approximately 104.5 A feet, more or less, to a point 10 feet Southeasterly from the most Northerly corner of Lot 1; thence North 450 95' West along the North- - east line of Lot 1 and Lot 3, a distance of approximately 15 feet to �.0 the West side of Pacific Highway; thence South 53° 04' West, a dis- 'r,r g stance of 106.7 feet to the Southwesterly Zine of Lot 3; thence along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 3, a distance of 15 feet to the point of beginning. _ ` EXCEPTING that portion of Lot 1, Block 3, conveyed by H. E. Doherty, rJ, H et ux, to Jean S. Vermilye, et vir, by deed recorded June 2, 1950, 1' in Book 307, page 439, Deed Records--------------------------------- "Y rant and cre/end the serrx and rsf°ry part and parcel thereof against the lawful claim. and demands of all /xrsnne tlatnvng hy. through, or undtr the l,rnntor The true and actual considervion paid for this transfer,stated in terms of dollars, + ffrftvytrTtet"Mrr•fl 'Te t�mhlrrrtttnr7-mrrmKrvF•aimrfuderoefier-ProPc*h"er+ale►r�rveer�f-f> wd+Ml�at►-w ' i }-�+e `,fhlA:•cTftSSRfrrtrtiorrfi^rtirttr•w•arch)"wTn.•wr.r.•nr.0,eraera•r.POW” rn►rJ.•+.nM.t••.sr!•�f•••►-•�litx.I+lr.' ---�"'n� rYJJ In construing this d ed rant'while the cors—t su r.•quur+, the sin4ulnr Includes the plural and All erammnfito/ chanties shall be implied to make the protisions hrr 1 aI,I :=lunlly w curporn(ions an .I AUU,tiduals. 19 g2; a Icy Witness Whereol, the grantor hes ex, 'wted this m tau meet rhe. day of � /icer il authorised thereto by e e if a corpurate grantor,it has cawed Its name to he signed nerd/s al a/fixed Y' )' order of its board of directors , ,y 0;."6t �V _ /u t DonP1d E. Doherty A Y € a 11r...aurae,y•ts,e.nrl.w. j — p Eunice M Doherty - # € STATE (IF OREGON, / !)TATE OF OREGON, County of - sw sa. 19 ..ae.,J.:ti. ) .. .. .. and _ el + C'ounry of T" 1 Personally appearaJ _ \'s\co It 19 ..... who, Wag duty to an, each lot himrell and not one lot the other,did say east the tornrer is Ore — r'rr.o—Ily apt.red the eho•s,ed president and that the letter Is the }r w DOn21d E—Doherty t1 and Eunice secretary of xa t ctit. Doherty • corporation. Y. z'"R +•` and A xm,,ledged the torefuinf inttru- a„r) that the,.,,eel alli+rd to the foregoing Irntrunwnt h thetwrpo,ets wd E t: the i~ x„4rnfNY act and JeeJ 'hall ..o,pon and rant ,aic•Ima wn.nl was dfr,ed and seated in fw _ •t ,. hall of said corporation by authority of Its hoard at directors; and each sal there acknuwledQed said rnattunrnt to be Its volunta.Y act and dNJ, r t Behrrr nx� �. Bslore me: (OFFICIAL 0 ` (rrFFIC1AL t t 7 c �r�l�•u SEAL) SEAL) / .y n` -•)rotary Public for Oregon Notary public for Oregon ' F hfy commis:on espies �`i' 11-b`� hfy commimon a•^C'^s' fi STATE Of OREGON r Donald E. Doherty, et ux •� County of Weant Qtan f t ,� • uor,aloW µas�rr ihtKivrplAasuwra,l _ e + *,' ' s e oe..,row•ns•.a s.r- suo.,+s snA lnsat,o”and is-0ffrtlq Ret,Jror+l OI COD• f r ryaoces for lain to,InN,do fWreby ryrUfy that r , y x David S Savory, et ux the V-41),41 K%1fCAent us writing wasi(ecerved u e ani record book of(0f,400 of rwlcyj Ymty. 4 }r+, txx aha W. 6U 101, DI t0/ 01 it s' oasnrss•+.•a a•,n s::..asa OP C9 (, A61. "I 'Id (; tts,0 On, ErJP f i roa OIN so *CO�Ady _ oak 5 � a/town,e � '•; 1 ` av1d S. Savory 12 245 S.W. Main Str4r-t. t Tigard OR 3721_3 6;:t;_ r,' t, .1& 111,1.aN.e. r M..N.e en r..✓.r..,ww A.11 M.«.r r.N.1.11—Wig �ic y 1982 AUG 10 AN 9: 16' � :.a', S. v8v.x ' same ac above y July 2, 1985 CITYOF TIRD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON Mike Russell 3711 NE Alameda AMENEEMIN Portland, Oregon 97212 RE: Completion of conditions of approval - Health Habit (SDR 23-85) Dear Mike: _ I am writing this letter to establish a deadline for completing the remaining conditions of approval. In the fall of last year, the City and Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District agreed to allow the opening of Health Habit with the understanding that the remaining Fire Code and site development conditions would be promptly resolved. Though we have been moving towards completion of these items, the tasks listed below still remain: 1. Closure of the western driveway to Hain Street. 2. Striping the parkin lot as shown in the approved pproved plan dated April s, 24, 1985. 3. Signs approved by the Engineering Division which direct vehicles on the site. 4. Submission of a landscaping plan for the strip between the parking area and the sidewalk and installation landscaping material after Planning Director approval. 5. Installation of two bicycle rack spaces. 6. Installation of necessary fire exits to meet Code requirements. If you have any questions regarding this list please contact Randy Clarno on items 1, 2, and 3; Ed Walden regarding item 6; and myself for number 4 and 5. The City will expect completion or substantial progress be made on each of the above ms by July 15, 1985. If compliance is not achieved, the City will be forced to take the appropriate steps within its legal authority to revoke the right to temporary occupancy and require compliance with the above conditions prior to any further occupancy of the building. A certificate of occupancy will not be issued until all conditions are met. 12755 S.W ASH P O. BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH.639.4171 i i It is our intent to cooperate with you in meeting these conditions but we must insist that they be resolved by July 15, 1985. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Keith S. Liden Senior Planner cc: Bldg. Inspector Engineering Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District (KSL:cz/1554P) ■ i• sM i! ■ s II ' f ' CITYOF TIIFARD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON April 24, 1985 I i, Mike Russell ? I 3711 NE Alameda 'f Portland, OR 97212 Fd P � RE: Health Habit (SDR 23-84) # ' Dear Mike: 4 Attached is a revised plan for the Health Habit parking area. it; order to meet Code requirements, three of the proposed spaces had to be eliminated. . The provision of landscaping within the vacant area between or in front of the d, i ! parking spaces is preferred overall and will be required adjacent to the j' i sidewalk. E` i The Engineering Division has noted that a permit through the Division will be ;? required to close the one driveway and the exit to Commercial Street should be clearly marked. You should contact Randy Clarno regarding these items. ' ;I Please call me after you have reviewed the plan and we can discuss the details relating to landscaping and parking layout. 'i Sincerely, @ ', r Keith S. Liden Associate Planner I, i (KSL:bs/1275P) enclosure cc: Randy Clarno, Eng. Ed Walden, Bldg. Inep. 'I 12755 S W. ASH P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD.OREGON 97223 PH:839-4171 ,�,,�°�"•�}�,�r,,�r„,,.:;�.�yam,,.,-�R P,,.._,t-^+��'�,..,�.._..�.77 lid i yy j g,. i V w i + r s �� 4 �. jAk hx T I j r ��T F i, z; v . ti kA �e m ---� --� tk is N 1 e v\ -18 NMI A. tN, } e J� t November 14, 1984 CirfOF 'n67ARD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON Attorney Fred Anderson Anderson, Dittman and Anderson P.O. Box 23006 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: SDR 23-84, Roof Sign Dear Attorney Anderson: I have reviewed the letter which you submitted on behalf of Hobart Vermilye with the City Attorney, Tim Ramis. Please be advised that the letter accurately details the settlement. The settlement allows the occupants of the building to apply for and receive a sign permit to utilize the existing sign structure to advertise up to March 20, 1988. As of March 20, 1988 the sign will be fully amortized and must be removed by the owner pursuant to ordinance No. 83-52. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, i William A. Monahan Director of Planning and Development (WAM:cz/0783P) fi 12755 S.W. ASN PO BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639.4171 i CITY OF TIGARD ' NOTICE OF DECISION ` SITE .,c.VELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 23-84 w f APPLICATION: Request by Hobart Vermilye for Site Development Review approval to allow the renovation of an existing building to accommodate a fitness facility, and sports medicine clinic, on property zoned CBD (Central Business ' District) and located at 12215 SW Main Street , Tigard, (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AA, Tax Lot 5500). ' DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described applications subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. :3ackground ; Previous land use cases have not been reviewed on this property. t 2. Vicinity Information h The property is located within downtown Tigard and all of the € surrounding properties are also zoned CBD. Pacific Highway is on . the north side of the property and commercial uses are to the east, south, and west . The U.S. Post Office is directly across the street. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description ,t Until recently, the building on the property has been used as a '' furniture store. The building is approximately 9400 square feet in size and the reminder of the 16,630 square foot property consists of seven parking spaces and several landscaped areas. A 'p. The applicant proposes to convert the building into a physical _� fitness facility including weight lifting, aerobics, karate, and a sports medicine clinic. The exterior of the building including .Y the existing signR illl not be aaterially altered and the present landscaping and parking layout will remain unchanged. In addition `' ` to the on-site parking spaces, seven public parking spaces are available in front of the building on Main Street. ' si 1 � I 4. Agency and NPO Comments 3 The Engineering Division recommends that the applicant should provide a traffic circulation plan, prepared by an engineer with .`;. traffic certification, for on-site and off-site traffic movement. This study is warranted because of the existing congestion associated with the Post Office across the street and the $^+° intensification in traffic that will be associated with the new •' use. The study should address the problem of turning movements on Main Street and the access to and from the parking lot . y NOTICE OF DECISION - CDR 23-84 - PAGE 1 i The Building Inspection Office indicates that the non-conforming roof sign should be removed as a condition of approval. No comments have been received from the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District. NPO G1 has no objection to the proposal but noted that the proposal did not appear to meet parking and landscaping requirements. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposal is consistent with the intent of the CBD zone. The existing building will not be altered on the exterior and the use proposed complies with the zone. The major issues which require further discussion relate to traffic circulation, parking, landscaping and signage. _ I. Traffic Circulation As noted the Engineering Division, there is the potential for serious conflicts and congestion problems due to the Post Office and the health club driveway locations. The purpose of the traffic study proposed by the Division will be •o determine the nature of the problem once the health club is established and to identify any necessary modifications that would be warranted to maintain acceptable traffic flow on Main Street. 2. Parking Based upon Code requirements, 31 parking spaces are necessary to serve the type and size of facility proposed. The Main Street area is a unique situation because of the existing development and the physical constraints that exist in relation to parking. The City policy for meeting the intent of the parking requirements for developed properties that are being remodeled, is to require the installation of as many on-site parking spaces as possible and a non-remonstrance agreement for the formation of a public parking facility. The site plan indicates that seven parking spaces are available on the property. It appears that at least two additional spaces could be placed on the property. A revised site plan illustrating property lines and parking spaces should be prepared. This site plan should include an adequate method for ingress and egress. MUM The Code requires one secure bicycle rack space for every 15 required car spaces. Two bicycle spaces should be provided near the entrance of the building and should be shown on the site plan noted above. i I NOTICE OF DECISION - SDK 23-84 - PAGE 2 f i ,r 3 . Landscaping The Code provides' that landscaping on 20 percent of the property = area is necessary . However, the intent of this section of the Code was primarily to apply to existing development in the CBD Zone. This proposal will not r_aussr the removal of any of the established landscaping which includes a number of planting areas E and several trees. A portion of the existing parking or the building would have to be removed in order to landscape 20 percent of the property. 4. Signs The building has three signs associated with it. The applicant intends to ka,!p the existing signs and change the faces to advertize the new use. The signs conform with the Code except for the roof sign. this type of sign is not allowed in any zoning a district of the City . The Code provides that signs in existence before January, 1971, that are not consistent with present — requirements shall be rs_moved. - C. DECISION a The Planning Director- approves the SUR 23 84 subject to the following rr conditions: •` 'i 1. UNLESS 01HERWISE NOTED, ALL. CONDITIONS 13HAL.L. BE MET PRIOR 10 ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT. 2. Joint use and maintenance agreements shall be recorded for all common driveways grid copies of the recorded document(s) shall be submitted to the Planning Dire,tor. — 3. A revised site plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval with the following changes: a. Additional parking spaces (as feasible) shall be provided. b. Property lines . C. A minimum of two bicycle rack spaces including rack design 4. A traffic circulation plan for un-site and off-site traffic movements shall be prepared by a certified traffic engineer. Said -- plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director (Frank Currie) . 5. A City of Tigard approved non-remonstrance agreement for a downtown public park irk3 facilities shall be submitted to the Engineering c,ectiort for review and subsequent City Council approval before an occupancy permit is issued or before a change in cu.nership. 6. The existing roof sign shall be removed, including all support structures . 7. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 23- 84 - PAGE 3 t j` D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant 6 owners X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON ()ctober 15, 19H4 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed WA r, the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.H. ()rtnt,er 15, 1904 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Plenniag Department, Tigard City Hall,. 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. Wiliam A. Monahan, Director of Planning S Development DAT APPROVED _ (KSL:cz/0694) NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 23-84 - PAGE 4 - t REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS TO �' ____ DATE: September 24, 1984 FROM: Tigard planning D�artment M RE: SDR 23-84 A request by 11o6art Vermilye for Site Development review approval - a f+ to allow the renovation of an existing building to accomodate a fitness facility, sports medicine clinic , and deli on property zoned CBD (Central Business District) Located at 12215 SW Main Stteet, Tigard, (WCTM 2S1 2AA lot 5500) F Attached is the Site Paan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 1st 19 84 iou may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date L please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. questions regarding this matter, contact Box 23397 Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. - 4 STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING; ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no, objections to it. Please contact of our office. E 't Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments: Ke.G w'.G z 0Q'XAe- C..�•+ 5ha�.\� \VtyC` 1. ' Z'4 S. O �61b�11� Ot 4!'��t1K0.� - T NA1 OG.Gut• ��1'z �G_�t_��t'�1� Name of Person Commenting: Phone No. 7�2 (KSL:pm/0356P) :� ' f L l �4'"1 r. >'�.._ �,..... .e�.a ' .rte .� t 1.Pte„ . ..... r: E r / / f r- f ✓ 'y .. .r .. � r. �.A� ,s. � ' � r � ��1� -�� , ;I is 41 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION ` CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) b39-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. _ I;I RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION C TED BY: DATE: 3 Ij 1. GENERAL INFORMATIONI Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCAT;ON 1 221 5 S . W . Main I ✓ (A) Application form (1) /(B) Owner's signature/written 1i at•thorization TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 2 S1 2 A A -5 5 0 0 , KINGSTON , BL K. 1 , LOTS 1 $ - 19 , PART 11 ✓(C) Title transfer instrument (1} SITE SIZE _ _7(D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* H RAPT P . VERMILYE _ , E) Plot plan (5 copies) i, 11272 S.W.ADDRESS PH;t?F: 24.4_1 213 _ (F) Alplicant's statement CITY PORTLAND ZIP _ (5 cople�) :. APPLICANT* MICHAEL D . RUSSELL I —#/(G) List of propert7 owner's ADDRESS 3711 N.E. Alameda 2HONE 282-9354 within 100 feet (1) .� (H) Filing fee CITY PORTLAND OR ZIP 91212 _� ��sU•I *When the owner and the applicant are diff teat people, the applicant must be the purchaser of r•-cord j en authorization i LATE DETERMINED TO IF COMFLETE: or a leasee in possession with writt +� from the owner or an agent of the owner with written — - j authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL D1:CI. lUN DEADLINE: _ submit a written authorization with this api.lication. . , COMP. PLAN/ZONh DESIGNATION: j 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY ij The owners of record of the subject property request_site c�evelo ment review ar roval t� i N.P.O. Number: allow },S ' TY HVkBIT HEALTH CLJ 3 ,v,, t; Approval Date: --SEE ATTACHM'�NT OR DETAILS-- Final Approval Date: - I Planning i Engineering F' 4. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive land a' or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: NONE or S. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. ' 6. THE APPLICANTS) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights ` granted in accordhnce with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the e pproval. C. All of the above btatements and the statements in the plot plan, 1 attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this 4 application, may be revoked if it is found that any such state,ents are F false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. > w DATED this 30TH day of AUGUST 19 84 t SIGKATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. } 4 (KSL:pm/C524P) E- Attachment 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Background The Health Habit is a co-ed fitness facility which was established in 1978. It is presently located at Suite 119 in the Tigard Plaza . This facility currently occupies approximately 5700 square feet and includes weight training , conditioning , sauna , jacuzzi , cold plunge , and both men ' s and women ' s locker rooms . Expanded Services _- The Health Habit which is to be located at 12215 S.W. Main _ will continue to provide all of the above listed services plus the following : 1 . Aerobics 2 . Karate 3 . Sports Medicine Clinic == 4. Deli Site Development Approval Criteria I . a-d The exterior of the current structure will remain as built . I . a The landscaping arrangement and area is depicted in Attachment 2 . More landscaping area is not recommended due to the large percentage of the property which is occupied by the structure and parking . All present landscape area will remain . I . f-h I believe the property meets this specification. See Attachment 2 . I . g Off street parking is depicted in Attachment 2. There are seven off street spaces . Additional off street =- parking is precluded due to the large percentage of the property which is occupied by the structure and _N landscaping . On street parking spaces in close proximity will provide adequate parking . I . i Signs will remain as located with new lettering added . J February 24, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council/Tigard Urban Renewal Agency FROM: Jeremy Coursolle, Associate Plannerk"— SUBJECT: Creating a Downtown Redevelopment Area Zone In December, 1981, the consultants for the Downtown Revitalization Plan submitted a report summary and plan summary for the downtown redevelopment - project. Briefly, these documents describe the area under consideration for redevelopment and the area's existing physical characteristics, the breakdown of the various project activities within the planning area, and the methods of fianncing for those project activities. These planning activities include the civic center, Fanno Creek park improvements, a major shopping center, and various infrastructure improvements (streets, storm sewers, etc. ) Currently, a portion of the redevelopment area is designated on the zoning - map as C-3M (Main Street Commercial) . (Attachment "A") While the remaining portion of the redevelopment area is designated A-12 (Multiple Family) , A-70/80 (Elderly Multiple Family) , C-3 (General Commercial), M-3 (Light Industrial) , M-4 (Industrial Park) , and floodplain. All of these zoning districts have dif!'crent development sta- 44 -- -, which affect setbacks, building heights and lor,ascaping requirements. -:;ause of these various differences, staff believes that it will be more difficult to maintain and regulate development within the downtown redevelopment area. To avoid any potential regulatory difficulties, staff believes that a separate zone should be established for the entire downtown redevelopment area (a cen- tral business district) . At a minimum, staff believes that the following standards should be developed for this downtown zoning district: 1) Uses - the zoning district should permit j commercial retail and office uses, high density residential, mixed uses and `f light industrial, e.g. , limited manufacturing such as electronic components; 2) Height requirements - given the need to promote more commercial and resi- dential activity in this area, height limitations should be extended to four or perhaps six stories; 3) Setbacks - to provide for adequate infill within the _ + area, setbacks should be reduced or eliminated especially along Main Street; 4) Landscaping - to create an aesthetic downtown area landscaping requirements along store fronts and within parking areas should be increased; 5) Parking - - combined public and/or private parking areas should be established to minimize the amount of pavement placed in the area. These parking areas should be cen- trally located throughout u;je red �1rnm,nf P,--- and F) Open , ,:_e - pockets of open space similar to Liberty Park should also be located throughout the area. The downtown area is unique to all other development areas within Tigard and the success of the downtown redevelopment project depends on a cohesive and ■ creative plan and development standards that are consistent within the re- development area. Paige 2 - City Council Action: Staff recommends that the City Council direct staff to work with the con- sultant and to draft the standards for a downtown district: to be reviewed by NPO #1, the Planning Commission, the Downtown Committee, and the City Council/Urban Renewal Agency in April or May. } { AGENDA TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 — 7:30 PM TIGARD CIVIC CENTER — TOWN HALL 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVE MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETI14G 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. 1 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENTMFNT ?OA '_P5 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 18. 142 Request by City of Tigard to review Chapter 18. 142, HOME OCCUPATIONS, of the Tigard Municipal Code and to consider amendments and revisions to Chapter 18. 142. 5.2 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 6-86 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 18.80 A request by the City of Tigard to review Chapter 18.80 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT of the Tigard Municipal Code and to consider amendments and revisions to Chapter 18.80. 6. Other Business Vacation Request o SW Electric Street — Near Tigard Arco o Pine Street — SW Office Supple Parkinq Area o Colony Greek IV Subdivision o Genesis II Subdivision o SW Burnham Street dj/143 t ; - I 6. Other Business Reviewed vacation request for SW Electric Street, Pine Street, Colony f ' Creek IV Subdivision, Genesis II Subdivision, and SW Burnham Street. Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Newman seconded to forward = Street Vacation request for Electric Street, Pine Street and Burnham Street to City Council with a recommendation for approval . Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner present. * Commissioner Owcns moved and Cammissioner Butler seconded to forward vacation request for Colony Creek IV Subdivision and Genesis II Subdivision to City Council with a recommendation for approval . Motion carried by majority vote of Commissioners present. Commissioner Newman abstained. 7. Meeting adjourned 10:20 PM Diane M. Jeldgrka, Secretary ATTEST: A. Donald Moen, President dj/177 i j 1 ® t i 3� e ® PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 - Page 3 DATE T I G A R D PLANNINGC_0MMI SS-ION NOTICE : ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME } and note; their address on this sheet. (Please Print your name) • I ITEM/DESCRIPTION: 4'. I , �' • ham.,..` .r'�'" �r AmK � • SW PROPONENT (For) OPPONENT (against) Na-e, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation --- �i - {I i I I i {I 11 -rI� aj I r, 7i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM_kU_MMARY AGENDA OF: September 8, 1986 AGENDA ITEM M: DATE SUBMITTED: August 27, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Street ELj- Vacation Request - Pine Street (SW PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson Office Supply Parkinq Area) REQUESTED BY: City Staff' DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Council initiated Street Vacation request - consistent with Council policy as adopted by Resolution No. 85-30 INFORMATION SUMMARY City Staff is requesting vacation of a portion of right-of-way formerly known as Pine Street which is currently being used by SW Office Supply for parking along SW Main Street. This request will allow SW Office Supply to improve the parking area for better circulation and parking use in the downtown area. Since this vacation will eliminate a piece of public street which is not currently on the maintenance schedule of the City and is in need of recommend Council initiate the vacation maintenance and repair, staff would request. Fees associated with the cost of the vacation process will be paid by the City of Tigard. If the attached resolution is approved, the public hearing would be scheduled for 10/13/86. The City Recorder will mail notice to each property owner who would normally be required to sign a vacation petition. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED '= 1. Approve attached resolution calling for public hearingjon 10/13/86. 2. Take no action at this time and require property owner to circulate petition. SUGGESTED ACTION Wwl ,.` Staff recommends alternative N1. ti ti R i, 1a`if €< lw/4099A 101 /0 914 .35 ♦ � • S�'�I4a9L —••E ""•r'�=_'o c� ,�A-F��'�=TSE SEE MAP 9/9 9/ 2S 1 2AB SOPLEMEN?AL MAP N0, 1 40 It14A OS4!•It H D.L.C. i1` IiEHH HICKLIY / I � /oO • �I oo° LIHt Of' y4 ° ROSOH - - _ tax • '. T�4X �l�r I I ' �1.9Y A Z�IZ T _ ae • 4� I N1 1 'I<7s° M s 1 - 2 / I /ZEA � I �°`�► �'� ;g °® �; 9 1 • E6 yAcaTYD 130 1 8 --T__- 4O 1 1 N 1 ° P.c a/,$(iiir .Y�Uiiiiiiiiiii//iiiiiiiiiiiiii.C//iiii//1a /Y�Sf�a/i.�vy as�c�»sq�iot✓ar� _ •c11\:.vl: T 80+40c O + t sI 2 < ,S ao S431'w - 4 ' 3 I y 9 TERM ?6qO� - CRIt22 • <. o O e'�s 70 o 0 G o � 0 z 1 m Z • E I 2�° r ° '• sc �' , � 2 :� •� s4T•l •vr . . loo ' 42.s _H47•A4'i Cl) c ti ny.-°r / -- — -- a IJ S 00 vT 14 LT 4 4L4 P'L 10 .• Oi'� 14t.1 J44.4t'w �"CZ `�►�.`1��. 1 W. 112.• • O so $ I 1 :e t. 100 I loo `°° • ^ / Ito s 10o Not II•E—T N•3l'w O . N 4 f t a a CITY OF TI:GARD, OREGON t RESOLUTION NO. 85-� A RESOLUTION OF THE HGARD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A POLICY STATEMENT FOR COUNCIL INITIATED STREET VACATIONS. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council Finds it necessary and expedient to irritate some vacation requests for public right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the Council wishes to adopt a policy statement setting forth when such Council initiated requests would be considered. NOW, ''HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: The following policy statement be used in determining whether Council would initiate a street or public right--of-way area: "In cases of hardship created by petiti� a circulation (i .e. area in two different counties, area develored commercial with owners located out--of-state, area developeJ commercial with large corporation signatures required, Petitions alrpadi in circulation during change in vacation procez ) , And it, ?,i i"a =he Citys bast interest to vacate. " PASSED: This gO day of 1985. dor - City of Tigard / ATTEST: eputy City Recorder - City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 85-,,� lw/2781A SUMMARY REPORT DOWNTOWN TIGARD REVITALIZATION < �f M M CL �l 2 1 _ r a� a � J -- \\V r s • / off• • �r o 4 \ l \ r � � 1 amen 0 MAN♦ �C r •T�'�r T CITYOF TIOAM , WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON SUMMARY REPORT DOWNTOWN TIGARD REVITALIZATION DANIELSON DRISCOLL HESS ARCHITECTS ONE EAST BROADWAY MALL WALK EUGENE. OREGON 97401 484.5757 JANUARY 12, 1982 SUMMARY REPORT DOWNTOWN TIGARD REVITALIZATION THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES THE CONSULTANT'S FINDINGS AND OBSERVATIONS RELATIVE TO DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION. THESE FINDINGS ARE PRESENTED TO ASSIST THE CITY AND THE AGENCY IN PROVIDING A COORDINATED PLANNING PROGRAM FOR DOWNTOWN TIGARD. FORMATION OF THE TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY AND THE ADOPTION OF THE DOWN- TOWN TIGARD REVITALIZATION PLAN PROVIDES A POSITIVE FIRST STEP IN THE REVITALIZATION PROCESS FOR DOWNTOWN TIGARD. DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION, HOWEVER, IS NOT THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY. A SUCCESSFUL REVITALIZATION PROGRAM WILL ALSO REQUIRE THE COOPERATIVE EFFORTS OF THE CITY, THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, THE DOWNTOWN TIGARD COMMITTEE, THE CIVIC CENTER COMMITTEE, THE NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS, AND ALL OTHER INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS AFFECTED BY DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT. THE RENEWAL PLAN FOCUSES ON A LIMITED NUMBER OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE UNDER- TAKEN BY THE AGENCY. FOR DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION TO ACHIEVE ITS MAXIMUM POTENTIAL, HOWEVER, OTHER INTERRELATED EFFORTS AND ACTIVITIES MUST ALSO BE INITIATED. ONE OF THE AGENCY'S FIRST ACTIVITIES WILL BE THE DETAILED PLANNING THAT MUST PRECEDE THE OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. DOWNTOWN PLANNING MUST BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY'S PLANNING, ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE AREA. IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT DOWNTOWN PLANNING START AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO DOWNTOWN CONCERNS CAN BE INCORPORATED INTO THE CITY'S STANDARDS THAT ARE PRESENTLY UNDERGOING REVISION. A. THERE ARE THREE ACTIVITIES PRESENTLY IN PROGRESS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AREA THAT SHOULD BE FULLY SUPPORTED. THEY ARE: 1. THE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER AT THE SOUTH END OF MAIN STREET. 2. THE PROPOSED FANNO CREEK PARK DEVELOPMENT. 3. THE PROPOSED CIVIC CENTER DEVELOPMENT PRESENTLY UNDER STUDY. 1. THESE PROJECTS ARE ESSENTIAL TO DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION AND SHOULD BE GIVEN MAXIMUM SUPPORT AND ENCOURAGEMENT BY THE CITY AND THE AGENCY. COMPLETION OF THE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER WILL MEAN MAIN STREET WILL HAVE A SHOPPING CENTER ANCHOR AT EACH END. THIS SHOULD ENCOURAGE INTENSIFICATION OF USE AND REDEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTIES ALONG MAIN STREET BETWEEN THESE TWO ANCHORS. 2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE FANNO CREEK PARK WILL ALSO CREATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR REDEVELOPMENT AT SOUTH MAIN, BETWEEN BURNHAM AND THE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER, AND ALONG BURNHAM STREET. THE PARK WILL PROVIDE A UNIQUE SETTING APPROPRIATE FOR GOVERNMENTAL AND OFFICE USE. THIS SHOULD INCREASE THE VALUE OF LANDS ADJACENT TO THE PARK THAT ARE NOW USED PRIMARILY FOR INDUSTRIAL AND STORAGE USES. THE CITY SHOULD ALSO CONSIDER ADDITIONAL REDEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES TO ENCOURAGE EARLY CONVERSION. AN OPEN SPACE CREDIT AND HIGHER DENSITY SITE COVERAGE FOR PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO THE PARK WOULD BE APPROPRIATE INCENTIVES. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS TO BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE PARK SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO COORDINATE AND INTEGRATE THEIR PROPOSALS WITH THE PLANNED PARK DEVELOPMENT THROUGH A DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS. 3. THE PROPOSED CIVIC CENTER IS ESSENTIAL TO DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION. THE CIVIC CENTER IN COMBINATION WITH THE FANNO CREEK PARK DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE THE MOST SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT AND CAN BECOME THE PRIMARY GENERATOR FOR REVITALIZATION OF THE BURNHAM STREET AREA. THE CIVIC CENTER SHOULD BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED FANNO CREEK PARK. A BURNHAM STREET LOCATION IN THE VICINITY OF ASH STREET OR MAIN STREET IS RECOMMENDED. A NEW CIVIC CENTER BUILDING LOCATED AT MAIN AND BURNHAM WOULD BE A HIGHLY VISIBLE LOCATION AND WOULD PROVIDE A FOCAL POINT FOR MAIN STREET WHILE ALSO PROVIDING A GATEWAY TO THE PARK FROM MAIN. A CENTRAL LOCATION ON BURNHAM IN THE VICINITY OF ASH STREET SHOULD ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT ALONG BURNHAM BETWEEN, MAIN AND ASH AND BETWEEN ASH AND HALL BOULEVARD. -1- , THE TIGARD DOWNTOWN COMMITTEE AND THE CIVIC CENTER COMMITTEE SHOULD BEGIN COORDINATING THEIR ACTIVITIES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THE DOWNTOWN COMMITTEE AND THE AGENCY SHOULD ASSIST THE CIVIC CENTER COMMITTEE IN LOCATING THE FACILITY AND COORDINATING THE TIMING OF SUPPORT FACILITIES CONTAINED IN THE AGENCY PLAN. THE CITY SHOULD ADOPT LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO ENCOURAGE COMPATIBLE USES ADJACENT TO THE CIVIC CENTER WHILE ALSO ESTABLISHING REDEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES FOR PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO THE PARK. B. TWO FUTURE EVENTS THAT COULD ALSO SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AND ACTIVITY PATTERNS ARE: 1. THE PROPOSED RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION. 2. THE PROPOSED TRI-MET TRANSIT CENTER DEVELOPMENT. 1. THE ACQUISITION OF A PORTION OF THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OFFERS THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXTEND TIGARD STREET THROUGH AND CONNECT IT WITH BURNHAM. THIS WOULD IMPROVE TRAFFIC MOVEMENT AND PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE DEEP BLOCK BETWEEN BURNHAM AND THE RAILROAD. ADDITIONAL OFF-STREET PARKING COULD ALSO BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE ACQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE CITY AND AGENCY SHOULD BEGIN NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RAILROADS TO DETERMINE TRACK CONSOLIDATION AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION POTENTIALS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE; POSSIBLY IN COOPERATION WITH THE CITY OF BEAVERTON. 2. THE PROPOSED TRI-MET TRANSIT CENTER COULD ALSO HAVE AN IMPACE ON DOWNTOWN ACTIVITY PATTERNS. IT IS DIFFICULT TO KNOW AT THIS TIME WHETHER THE IMPACT WOULD BE POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE. THE CENTER COULD BRING MORE PEOPLE TO THE DOWNTOWN AREA THEREBY INCREASING ITS COMMERCIAL VIABILITY OR THE INCREASED BUS TRAFFIC COULD INCREASE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND CREATE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC HAZARDS. THE CITY AND AGENCY SHOULD BEGIN A COOPERATIVE PLANNING STUDY WITH TRI-MET CONCERNING THE PROPOSED TRANSIT CENTER FOR TIGARD. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA AND IMPACT ANALYSIS SHOULD BE JOINTLY INVESTIGATED. C. LAND USES IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA ARE PRESENTLY UNCOORDINATED AND CONFLICTING. INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING, STORAGE WAREHOUSING, COMMERCIAL, HOUSING, GOVERN- MENTAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE USES ARE ALL INTERMIXED WITHOUT A CLEAR ORGANIZATIONAL PATTERN OR PLAN. PLANNED LAND USES AND ZONED LAND USES ARE ALSO PRESENTLY IN CONFLICT WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. IF DOWNTOWN REVITA- LIZATION IS TO ACHIEVE ANY SORT OF CLARITY, THIS CONDITION MUST BE CORRECTED -2- AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THE LAND USE PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA SHOULD BE REANALYZED TO REFLECT THE LAND USE CHANGES THAT HAVE OCCURED AND THE CHANGES NECESSARY TO SUPPORT DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION. A LAND USE PLAN THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE DOWNTOWN PLAN SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED BY THE CITY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. COMMERCIAL, GOVERNMENTAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SHOULD PREDOMINATE WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. THE FIRST GOAL OF THE RENEWAL PLAN STATES: "TO PROVIDE AN IDENTITY FOCUS FOR THE TIGARD COMMUNITY AND TO IMPROVE THE VIABILITY OF DOWNTOWN TIGARD AS A COMMERCIAL, GOVERNMENTAL AND COMMUNITY CENTER FOR THE CITIZENS OF TIGARD." DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION REQUIRES AN INTENSIFICATION OF COMPLEMENTARY USES THAT ARE INTEGRATED INTO A PLANNED ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE. TO ACCOMPLISH THIS GOAL, THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS ARE SUGGESTED: 1. THE INDUSTRIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION SHOULD BE DELETED FROM THE DOWNTOWN AREA. THERE IS PRESENTLY 26.82 ACRES DESIGNATED INDUSTRIAL USE BY THE CITY. EXISTING INDUSTRIAL USES MAY BE PERMITTED UNTIL SUCH USE IS CONVERTED OR DISCONTINUED. INDUSTRIAL USES GENERALLY REQUIRE LARGE LAND AREA AND ARE INCOMPATIBLE WITH AND DISRUPTIVE TO OTHER USES. FUTURE INDUSTRIAL USES SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE RENEWAL AREA. 2. MAIN STREET IS THE COMMERCIAL CORE OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND SHOULD BE RESERVED FOR PREDOMINANTLY COMMERCIAL USE. HOWEVER, VEHICULAR SERVICE AND REPAIR BUSINESSES SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO LOCATE OUTSIDE OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA. SERVICE STATIONS, TIRE STORES AND REPAIR SHOPS ARE GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREAS OF THE CITY. THIS TYPE OF ACTIVITY IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA CREATES PEDESTRIANNEHICULAR CONFLICTS AND CAUSES TRAFFIC HAZARDS AND CONGESTION ON DOWNTOWN STREETS. 3. BURNHAM, COMMERCIAL AND SCOFFINS STREETS SHOULD ALSO BE RESERVED FOR PREDOMINANTLY COMMERCIAL USE IN THE VICINITY OF MAIN STREET. 4. PUBLIC GOVERNMENTAL USES AND COMMERCIAL USES ARE VERY COMPATIBLE AND SHOULD BE FREELY INTEGRATED WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AREA ALTHOUGH GOVERN- MENTAL AND OFFICE ACTIVITIES WOULD BE IDEALLY LOCATED ADJACENT TO FANNO CREEK PARK WITH ACCESS FROM BURNHAM STREET. THE RECOMMENDED LOCATION FOR THE PROPOSED CIVIC CENTER IS ALSO BETWEEN BURNHAM STREET AND THE PARK. THESE TWO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD PROVIDE AMPLE INCENTIVES FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SOUTH BURNHAM STREET AREA. 5. RESIDENTIAL LAND USE IS ALSO COMPATIBLE WITH COMMERCIAL AND GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES AND CAN PROVIDE A SUPPORT POPULATION FOR THE COMMERCIAL CORE. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN IS PRESENTLY LOCATED ADJACENT TO HALL BOULEVARD. IF THE DOWNTOWN AREA CANNOT ATTAIN FULL COMMERCIAL AND GOVERNMENTAL UTILIZATION, ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY HOUSING WOULD BE THE MOST APPROPRIATE SUPPORTING ACTIVITY FOR THE AREA. FUTURE HOUSING SHOULD ALSO BE LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF HALL BOULEVARD AND -3- , SOUTH OF FANNO CREEK. RESIDENTIAL EXPANSION TOWARD MAIN STREET SHOULD BE DEPENDENT UPON THE COMMERCIAL AND GOVERNMENTAL LAND NEEDS WHICH WILL BE DETERMINED IN THE DETAILED PLANNING STUDIES TO FOLLOW. PRIORITY SHOULD BE GIVEN TO COMMERCIAL AND GOVERNMENTAL USES UNLESS THE DETAILED PLANNING STUDIES INDICATE THE AREA CANNOT ATTAIN FULL COMMERCIAL AND GOVERNMENTAL UTILIZATION. D. THE FOLLOWING SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE ARE CONSIDERED NECESSARY TO CORRECT EXISTING CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE AND TO PROVIDE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION GOALS. 1. THREE LOTS ON THE WEST SIDE OF HALL, JUST SOUTH OF THE PAYLESS/ALBERT- SON'S SHOPPING CENTER ENTRANCE, ARE NOW DESIGNATED COMMERCIAL. THESE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: ° THE ADJACENT FRONTAGE TO THE SOUTH ON HALL IS RESIDENTIAL. ° THESE LOTS ARE NOW IN RESIDENTIAL USE, THE SOUTHERLY LOT BEING ON A SMALL KNOLL AND WITHOUT CONVENIENT ACCESS TO THE STREET. 2. THIS AREA IS PART OF THE PAYLESS/ALBERTSON'S SHOPPING CENTER, BUT IS DESIGNATED ON THE NPO 41 PLAN AS A PARK. THE PLAN DESIGNATION SHOULD BE CHANGED TO COMMERCIAL TO REFLECT THE EXISTING SITUATION. 3. THE TRIANGULAR SITE ADJACENT TO AREA 2 COULD ACCOMODATE THE PARK USE IF THIS NEED STILL EXISTS; OTHERWISE, IT SHOULD REMAIN RESIDENTIAL USE. 4. THIS AREA IS DESIGNATED COMMERCIAL IN THE PLAN. IT CONTAINS A MOBILE HOME PARK, APARTMENTS AND SEVERAL RESIDENCES. THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF ASH STREET IS DEVELOPED WITH APARTMENTS AND FACES APARTMENTS ON THE OTHER SIDE; IT WOULD BE DESIRABLE TO MAINTAIN THE RESIDENTIAL CHARAC- TER OF ASH STREET. THE REMAINDER OF THE AREA COULD ALSO BE CHANGED TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, WHICH I.S ITS EXISTING PRIMARY USE. 5. THIS AREA IS DESIGNATED IN THE PLAN AS COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL, BUT IS ZONED INDUSTRIAL. THE DEVELOPMENT OF FANNO CREEK PARK, THE ELDERLY HOUSING PLANNED NEARBY AND THE REVITALIZATION ACTIVITIES PLANNED WOULD INDICATE THAT THE LAND US UNDERUTILIZED AS INDUSTRIAL AND SHOULD SUPPORT A MORE INTENSIVE USE. THE PORTION SOUTH OF BURNHAM STREET COULD SUPPORT A VARIETY OF USES SUCH AS APARTMENTS, CIVIC CENTER, COMMERCIAL, OR PROFESSIONAL OFFICES. USES SUCH AS STORAGE WAREHOUSES, INDUSTRIAL USES AND PUBLIC WORKS YARDS ARE A LIABILITY TO DEVELOPING NEIGHBORING PRO- PERTIES AND ARE NOT A GOOD UTILIZATION OF DOWNTOWN PROPERTY. THE PORTION -4- NORTH OF BURNHAM STREET ADJACENT TO THE RAILROAD IS ALSO UNDERUTILIZED. NONE OF THE USES THERE REQUIRE RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION. RATHER THAN TO ENCOURAGE A LARGE WAREHOUSING OR MANUFACTURING FIRM TO LOCATE THERE, THE APPROACH SHOULD BE TO BUFFER THE AREA FROM THE RAILROAD THROUGH CREATION OF JOINT TRACKAGE, LANDSCAPING, AND BUILDING SETBACKS. WITH MEASURES TO MITIGATE EFFECTS OF THE RAILROAD, THE AREA COULD SUPPORT COMMERCIAL, PROFESSIONAL OFFICE OR EVEN CERTAIN TYPES OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. 6. THIS AREA IS DESIGNATED INDUSTRIAL AND ZONED INDUSTRIAL. LIKE AREA NUMBER 5, THIS AREA SHOULD BE REDESIGNATED COMMERCIAL, ALTHOUGH IT SHOULD BE MADE CLEAR THAT GENERAL TELEPHONE IS AN APPROVED USE. 7. THIS AREA IS LOCATED IN THE BLOCK WEST OF MAIN STREET AND JUST NORTH OF FANNO CREEK. THE PLAN SHOWS THIS AREA AS PART OF THE PARK. IT IS NOW IN COMMERCIAL USE AND SHOULD PROBABLY REMAIN SO. SEE MAP ON FOLLOWING PAGE. _5_ z z u)u It Lu It 0- z 0 N Fm LLJ VE z 0 z oil FM LL 0 E. THE STREET SYSTEM AND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ARE THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS IN NEED OF IMPROVEMENT WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. REDEVELOPMENT WILL CREATE ADDITIONAL DEMANDS ON THE SYSTEM AND PAST STUDIES MAY NOT HAVE ACCOUNTED FOR THE IMPACTS DUE TO DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION. THE CITY AND AGENCY SHOULD BEGIN A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF TRAFFIC CONDITIONS, PROBLEMS AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS FOR DOWNTOWN STREETS. INCLUDE CONSIDERATION OF PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE NEEDS, OPPORTUNITIES OR POTENTIAL CONFLICTS. EVALUATE TRAFFIC NEEDS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED PLANS FOR DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT AND COORDINATE FINDINGS INTO A PRIORITY LISTING OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE RENEWAL AGENCY. PARTICULAR ATTENTION SHOULD BE PAID TO INTERSECTION CONTROLS AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS. THE DOWNTOWN HAS NO CROSS INTERSECTIONS. ALL INTERSECTIONS ARE OF THE "T" TYPE. MAIN STREET POSES THE MOST DIFFICULT PROBLEM. MAIN STREET HAS FIVE "T" INTERSECTIONS IN ADDITION TO THE TWO INTERSECTIONS WITH PACIFIC HIGHWAY. CROSS LANE TURNS CREATE TRAFFIC HAZARDS AND CONGESTION. 1. LEFT-HAND TURN LANES WITH A CENTER MEDIAN ISLAND SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED FOR MAIN STREET. 2. CURB CUTS SHOULD BE MINIMIZED ON MAIN STREET. CURB CUTS ONLY INTENSIFY THE TRAFFIC HAZARDS AND CONGESTION PROBLEMS. MAIN STREET SHOULD MAIN- TAIN A DENSE BUILDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN WITHOUT INTERVENING PARKING LOTS. PARKING ACCESS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FROM THE OTHER INTERSECTING STREETS. 3. PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES ARE MINIMAL IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. SIDEWALKS SHOULD BE WIDE ENOUGH TO ACCOMODATE MOVEMENT, TREES AND LANDSCAPING, BENCHES AND OTHER PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES AND CONVENIENCES. 4. SIDEWALK EXTENSIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT ALL CROSSWALKS TO MINIMIZE THE EXTENT OF STREET CROSSING. 5. LANDSCAPED PEDESTRIAN WAYS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FROM ALL PARKING LOTS TO STREET SIDEWALKS AND BUILDINGS. 6. LANDSCAPED PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE WAYS SHOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED FROM MAIN, BURNHAM, ASH AND HALL BOULEVARD AND CONNECTED TO THOSE CONTAINED IN THE FANNO CREEK PARK AREA. 7. THERE IS A PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PACIFIC HIGHWAY BRIDGE; THIS SHOULD BE EXPANDED AND IMPROVED AS PART OF THE PARK TO PROVIDE A LINKAGE TO MAIN STREET PEDESTRIAN WAYS AND THE NPO 42 AREA. -6- F. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SHOULD BE PREPARED AND ADOPTED FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE DOWNTOWN BE DIVIDED INTO AREAS OF COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OR CONCERNS. EACH STREET HAS A UNIQUE CHARACTER AND SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT CONCERNS. EACH BLOCK DEFINED BY THE STREET SYSTEM ALSO HAS SPECIALIZED CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS THAT SHOULD BE ADDRESSED. THE FOLLOWING COMMERCIAL SUBAREAS ARE HEREBY IDENTIFIED FOR FURTHER STUDY AND REFINEMENT RELATIVE TO APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: 1. MAIN STREET 1.1) THE NORTHWESTERN BLOCKS OF MAIN STREET 1.2) THE SOUTHEASTERN BLOCK AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH MAIN STREET 2. BURNHAM STREET 2.1) THE SOUTHWESTERN AREA BETWEEN BURNHAM AND FANNO CREEK 2.2) THE NORTHEASTERN BLOCK BETWEEN BURNHAM AND THE RAILROADS 3. COMMERCIAL STREET 3.1) THE SOUTHWESTERN AREA BETWEEN COMMERCIAL AND THE RAILROADS 3.2) THE NORTHEASTERN AREA ASSOCIATED WITH COMMERCIAL STREET 14. THE COMMERCIAL AREA OF SCOFFINS STREET 5. PACIFIC HIGHWAY 6. HALL BOULEVARD EACH OF THESE SUBAREAS MAY REQUIRE THE APPLICATION OF DIFFERING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE SPECIFIC ISSUES AND CONCERNS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH AREA. APPLICATION OF CONSISTENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SHOULD ASSIST IN CREATING A COORDINATED AND UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND IMAGE WHILE ALSO PREVENTING ACTIONS THAT WOULD DETRACT FROM A COORDINATED PLANNING EFFORT. THE PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WOULD APPLY WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND SHOULD INCLUDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR: A) STREET WIDTHS, TURN LANES, SIGNALIZATION, ON-STREET PARKING, CURB CUTS AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS. B) SIDEWALK WIDTHS, SURFACING MATERIALS, AND CONTROL JOINT PATTERNS. C) LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING, BENCHES AND OTHER PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES. -7- D) UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WOULD APPLY TO PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT AND COULD INCLUDE STANDARDS FOR: A) BUILDING HEIGHT. B) SITE COVERAGE AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING AND/OR PARKING. C) BUILDING PARKING AND ACCESS LOCATIONS. D) LANDSCAPING AND PEDESTRIAN LINKAGES TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK SYSTEM. E) DESIGN, COLOR, MATERIAL USAGE AND SIGNAGE. EACH STREET SYSTEM AND EACH DEFINED BLOCK HAS CONDITIONS THAT MAY REQUIRE VARYING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN ORDER TO FULLY CAPITALIZE ON ITS POTENTIAL. FOR INSTANCE, THE NORTHWESTERN BLOCKS OF MAIN STREET ARE UNIQUE DUE TO THEIR ABUTMENT WITH THE PACIFIC HIGHWAY EMBANKMENT. APPLICABLE STANDARDS HERE MIGHT INCLUDE: A) WIDE PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE SIDEWALKS (10-12 FEET) AT MAIN STREET. B) CURBSIDE LANDSCAPING AND STREET TREES BETWEEN PARKING STALLS. C) PARALLEL CURBSIDE PARKING. D) LEFT-HAND TURN LANES WITH RAISED LANDSCAPED MEDIAN STRIPS. E) NO PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS ACROSS TURN LANES. PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS SHOULD OCCUR AT THE CORNER OPPOSITE THE TURN LANE AND HAVE SIDE- WALK EXTENSIONS TO THE TRAVEL LANE WHICH COULD ACCOMODATE BENCHES, TRASH RECEPTACLES, TELEPHONE BOOTHS AND OTHER PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES. F) NO CURB CUTS OR AUTO ACCESS FROM MAIN STREET. G) NO ON-SITE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. JOINT-USE PARKING LOTS COULD BE PROVIDED AT TIGARD AND COMMERCIAL STREETS UTILIZING A PORTION OF THE ACQUIRED RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. OTHER PARKING COULD BE PROVIDED FROM JOINT-USE LOTS BEHIND BUILDINGS FRONTING ON MAIN IN SOUTHEASTERN BLOCK AREAS OF MAIN STREET. H) PEDESTRIAN ALLEYS BETWEEN BUILDINGS COULD PROVIDE ACCESS TO A CONTINUOUS LANDSCAPED PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AT THE BASE OF THE PACIFIC HIGHWAY EMBANKMENT THAT WOULD ALLOW PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE SIDES AND REAR OF MAIN STREET BUILDINGS AND ENLARGE THE NUMBER OF POTENTIAL SHOPS FOR THIS AREA. RESTAURANTS COULD PROVIDE OPEN COURTYARD DINING ADJACENT TO THE PEDESTRIAN WAYS CREATING A UNIQUE SHOPPING ENVIRONMENT WITH INCREASED ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE. -8- DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WOULD APPLY TO THE BURNHAM STREET BLOCKS ADJACENT TO THE PARK. THE PROPOSED PARK IS A UNIQUE SETTING FOR BUSINESS OR OFFICE USE WHICH REQUIRES SPECIALIZED DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS. HERE, BUILDING DENSITY COULD BE SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED DUE TO THE ADJACENT OPEN SPACE OF THE PARK. COMBINED BUILDING AND ON-SITE PARKING DEVELOPMENT APPEARS APPRO- PRIATE IN THIS AREA WITH PEDESTRIAN WAYS THAT WOULD LINK BURNHAM STREET AND THE DEVELOPMENT SITE TO THE PARK. PARK ACCESS CAN BE A VALUABLE EMPLOYEE AMENITY THAT SHOULD BE RECOGNIZED AND UTILIZED. ON-STREET PARKING ON BURNHAM DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE NECESSARY BEYOND THE IMMEDIATE INFLUENCE OF MAIN STREET ALTHOUGH THIS ASSUMPTION SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED FURTHER. IT SHOULD BE EMPHASIZED THAT SOME DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WOULD APPLY UNI- FORMLY THROUGHOUT THE DOWNTOWN AREA WHILE OTHERS MIGHT ONLY APPLY WITHIN SPECIFIED SUBAREAS. PREPARATION AND ADOPTION OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA SHOULD BE ONE OF THE EARLY PLANNING TASKS OF THE AGENCY AND CITY. WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN PLACE, THE DOWNTOWN WILL HAVE ONE OF ITS MOST VALUABLE TOOLS FOR CONSISTENT AND INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT. G. A SITE PLAN REVIEW OR DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURE MAY ALSO BE UTILIZED TO GUIDE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. A REVIEW PROCEDURE IS A VALUABLE METHOD OF GUARANTEEING THAT DEVELOPMENTS ARE COMPATIBLE. IT IS NOT ALWAYS POSSIBLE TO ANTICIPATE ALL THE PROBLEMS OR CONDITIONS THAT MAY OCCUR. A REVIEW PROCEDURE PROVIDES THE OPPORTUNITY TO PREVIEW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND MAKE ANY REQUIRED ADJUSTMENTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. A PROJECT REVIEW PROCEDURE IS HIGHLY APPROPRIATE FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND SHOULD BE UTILIZED TO GUIDE DEVELOPMENT. THE ADOPTED REVIEW PROCEDURES AND EVALUATION STANDARDS SHOULD .BE WELL DEFINED TO INSURE THAT THE PROCESS IS CONSISTENTLY-APPLIED AND ADMINISTERED. THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AS ADMINISTERED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, IS THE APPROPRIATE PLACE FOR THIS PROCEDURE AND SHOULD BE INCORPORATED THEREIN DURING THE CITY'S PLAN AND ORDINANCE REVISIONS NOW UNDER REVIEW. IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT THE MOMENTUM GAINED DURING THIS INITIAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT PHASE NOT BE LOST. THE RECOMMENDED ACTIVITIES CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT MUST BEGIN IMMEDIATELY TO INSURE THAT EACH NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA WILL CONTRIBUTE TO THE DESIRED PATTERNS THAT SUPPORT DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION. THE FIRST TASK SHOULD BE THE UPDATE OF THE CITY'S OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS THAT SUPPORT DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION. -9- PREPARATION OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND PROJECT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR DOWNTOWN LAND USE DISTRICTS AND SUBDISTRICTS IS THE MOST URGENT TASK OF THE DOWNTOWN COMMITTEE AND AGENCY. PROPOSED STANDARDS MUST BE PREPARED, STUDIED AND APPROVED BY THE COMMITTEE AND AGENCY PRIOR TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL FOR INCLUSION IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE. THIS SHOULD OCCUR PRIOR TO THE CITY'S ADOPTION OF THE REVISED PLAN AND ORDINANCES NOW UNDER- GOING REVIEW. IN ORDER TO ADEQUATELY PREPARE RELEVANT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS HOWEVER, REQUIRES A DETAILED PLANNING PROCESS THAT ESTABLISHES THE DESIRED PATTERNS OF DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL PROVIDE THE MAXIMUM BENEFIT FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA. THE RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT PROVIDES AN INITIAL STARTING POINT FOR THIS ACTIVITY. IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT THE TIGARD DOWNTOWN COMMITTEE CONTINUE THIS PLANNING EFFORT WITH CITY ASSISTANCE. -10- , i J �liL"C. �/`��L .>S�� ' ��C�- �`• S G�C`�• �L-�/'C�i'�.��sC. � r 1 Ile Ole -n-e/, � '21 _ ,/f %_! '�'.I`I�- l�O��/!�L-� f' /�►{��c�1C� 7`/�-G ;%is l/� � t L A S < N EL PL.• 3 36 r J� P � S J. OA"I'll," *� FfT � p s 8 � 4. (y Qom. � 7 O iL � s P y, iy •c GSE 9 u STREET I 1 J� 0 MARA Ic W �LpGK D ) AG�L�M DOWNTOWN HESS I G A ARCHITECTS R D NE33 ARCHITECT$ CITY OF TIGARD DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION PLAN r< � o rR z La N ELF7PL. 3r 36 � 2 I r ?J J� P � S O�t�` P, T FFT \ Po•Y 8 � I /> 1 ti Qom• , I 0 � s P y, GLE q F STREET J� 0•MARA \° W F 5L. OG K D I AGIZP�M DOWNTOWN DANIELSOI G ARCHITEC R D ~ESS ARCHITECTS CITY OF TIGARD DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION PLAN BLOCK 1 (BETWEEN MAIN, HALL, SCOFFINS) 25-1-2AA # OWNER 100 HOFFARBER, E. 101 HOFFARBER PROP. 200 HESS, C. 400 BISSETT & BISSETT, LTD. 490 BISSETT 500 LANDIS 600 MCCALL 602 MCCALL 603 MCCALL 901 ALBERTSON'S 903 MCDONALD'S 904 ALBERTSON'S 905 PIONEER SAVINGS 906 MONTIC ASSOC. 3100 FAIR, A. 3200 CRAGHEAD 3300 SCHROEDER 3301 PERKEL 3400 SHEPPARD 3500 STONE, L. BLOCK 2 (BETWEEN ASH, HALL, SCOFFINS, COMMERCIAL) 2-1-2AA # OWNER 3701 MILLERING, D. 2-1-2AD # OWNER 100 ASHER, H. 200 LUIZZI, N. 300 APPLEMAN, R. 400 POLLOCK, D. 401 POLLOCK, D. 500? 600 GOETZE, W. 700 REILING, M. 800 KATHER, J. 900 SHEININ, J. BLOCK 3 (BETWEEN MAIN, ASH, SCOFFINS, COMMERCIAL) 2-1-2AA # OWNER 2300 MOTE, L. 2301 U.S. BANK - 2302 MOTE, L. 2400 U.S. BANK 2500 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 2501 KENNEDY, R. 2600 GAGLIA, N. 2700 BOLMAN, G. 2800 RANDALL, R. 2900 SUMICH, M. 3000 PIETILA, A. 3800 BLAKESLEE, R. 3801 JENKINS, R. 3802 TRUEAX, F. 3900 BOLMAN, H. 3901 LEE, V. 3902 BOLMAN, H. 3903 LEE, V. 4000 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 4100 GIROD'S MARKET 4200 GIROD, P. 4201 GIROD, J. 2-1-2AD 1100 TUALATIN RURAL F.P.D. BLOCK 4 (BETWEEN MAIN, COMMERCIAL, HALL, S P RAILROAD) 2-1-2AA # OWNER 4700 4800 KADEL, 0. _ 4900 WASH. FED. SAV. 4901 KADEL, 0. 5000 BISHOP 2-1-2AD # OWNER 1200 EAGLESON ASSOC. 1202 EAGLESON ASSOC. 1203 TRADEWELL STORES 1204 EAGLESON ASSOC. BLOCK 5 (BETWEEN MAIN, S.P. RAILROAD, HALL, BURNHAM) 2-1-2AB # OWNER 3900 FORD, W. 4000 HAKOLA, G. 4001 FORD, W. 4100 SETTECASE, C. 4200 FORD, W. 4290 AKERS, H. 4300 MOORE, R. 4400 TIGARD, CITY 4500 MOORE, E. 4600 WOODARD, C. 4700 HOFFARBER PROP. 4800 GEN. TELEPHONE CO. 4900 BEAM, E. 5000 MCDAID, M. 5100 CORDI, D. 5200 HELMER INV. 5300 DEHARPPORT, D. 5301 DEHARPPORT, D. BLOCK 5 (CONT. 2-1-2AD # OWNER 1300 TIGARD MACHINE CO. 1400 MILLER, R. 1500 MODERN PLUMBING 1501 SPOHN, W. 1600 AMER. MARINE BANK 1601 OCHS, J. 1700 RUFF, R. 1800 DAVIS, M. 1900 WERT, B. 2000 AIRKING MFS. 2100 AIRKING MFS. BLOCK 6 (BETWEEN O'MARA, HALL, BURNHAM, S.W. O'MARA EXTENDED) 2-1-2DA # OWNER 200 REOH, H. 300 SCHRAMM, L. 400 STURGIS, R. 700 TIGARD, CITY OF 701 CHURCH 702 STURGIS, R. 2-1-2DB # OWNER 100 GEN. TELEPHONE 400 PALASKE, E. 500 PALASKE, E. 600 TIGARD, CITY OF 601 HILL, J. 602 GARVIN, L. 603 TURVEY, L. 604 CHAMBERLAIN, J. 2-1-2AD # OWNER 2100 BLOCK 7 (BETWEEN ASH, BURNHAM, S.W. 0-MARA EXTENSION, S.W. HILL) 2-1-2AD # OWNER 2200 ROBT. RANDALL CO. 2400 DANIELS, R. 2500 DANIELS, R. 2600 DANIELS, R. 2700 MILLER, R. 2800 TIGARD, CITY OF 2900 KEEFER, W. 3000 TIGARD SANITARY DIST. 2-1-2DB # OWNER 200 ROBT. RANDALL CO. 201 ATWOOD CORP. 202 ATWOOD CORP. 203 ANDERSON, H. 204 ANDERSON, H. 300 HARDIN, R. 301 PHILA. SQ. APTS. BLOCK 8 (BETWEEN MAIN, BURNHAM, ASH, MCKENZIE EXTENDED) 2-1-2AC # OWNER 100 CROW, C. 200 LEE, ET AL. 201 MAIN ST. LAND CO. 202 S.W. PORTLAND 203 TIGARD, CITY OF 300 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY 400 DOLAN, J. 500 TIGARD, CURTIS 600 VERMILYE, H. 700 BOEHI, H. 1100 DUNFORD, R. 1101 GULLEY, J. 1200 MAIN ST.LAND CO. 1300 MAIN ST. LAND CO. 1400 MAIN ST. LAND CO. 1500 MAIN ST. LAND CO. 1600 PIPKIN, G. 1700 VILLAGE SQ. 1701 PATTERSON, J. ALLEN 1703 JACKSON, J. 1704 JACKSON, J. 1800 ALLISON, K. 2200 MAIN ST. LAND CO. 2300 HANNEMANN, A. 2301 BISBEE, L. BLOCK 9 (BETWEEN MAIN, HWY. 99, S.P. RAILROAD - SOUTH) 2-1-2AB # OWNER 2000 FINKE, A. 2100 FINKE; A. 2200 CACH, G. 2300 HANSON, D. 2400 HANSON, D. 2401 HANSON, D. 2402 JANOE, C. 2800 ARISS, L. 3100 MCCLURE, C. 3300 PETERS, R. 3400 MCCLURE, C. 3500 PETERS, R. 2-1-2AC # OWNER 800 HEUVELHORST, M. 900 DAVIS, E. 1000 HOFFARBER PROP. BLOCK 10 (BETWEEN HWY. 99, MAIN, S.P. RAILROAD - NORTH) 2-1-2AA # OWNER 5100 MILLER, P. 5200 MARTELL, A. 5300 VERMILYE, H. 5500 VERMILYE, H. 2-1-2AB # OWNER 3600 JOHNSON, W. 3700 DOHERTY, D. 0 Z < r� EL PL. 3 3 6 2 I v 1- r e QJ n w O� P' S O <\4 S \ 8 / I �ti Qom• � \ r � 7 0 F GLE q STREET 1 Y c� O J� 0� MARA -- -----��— • W F- L. CSG 0 iee fea ' / DANIELSON DRISCOLL HESS D1 WNTOWN T I G A R D ARCHITECTS CITY OF TIGARD DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION PLAN •�°"