9575 SW LEWIS LANE �NH7 :'IM311 tis SLS6
i
Ad&,eU
Name o. Occupant�. '� r Permit chary --
—__--—_-- Dain ;onnected
Type of Building Inapec'ion
Zarv`ce Rate Ned by _— ____D,te—
Contractor— �_ Anewrent_�_.—_—Paid _
r
Size of connection
1
1
� n
Add:
Name of owupaaf Paamit chatp�
Paid by
r /
gervi .Rata 7 •t Pald M
Cootracwf llsrwm•�.�------�aSd
E'6 2
3
.4
z
Address �'� ��� f Permit No.
._�_ -
Nacos of OccupantrQ Permi!charge
Paid 67 —____ - •
Type of Building� ��!^—' _ — Inspection
t
Service Elatev Paid b1 — iJats_
�_antractor — Assessment
Size of connection
a
PERMrr TO cocr
Tiga-rd Sanitary Dist3de =3 z-
J
PERMIT N? 9 2 3 nATZ
PrLmlT is C.IVTN TO
of " ,or '
TO C7DXNZC r A
jT37= . f!7RARD 3 Axff A" DdT RZCt
AT //i�' � /. ter.♦ /�`
T213 PCUUT Nun 1i mgrzD ON Tln Dssk"22m4D lommma C'!T!L CON-
NIMON 12 1LAD! A" OMFIX MM QT 14O"MC 110M WAS Z� C M
ri rmn.
t[=xt! 113 !!ID Z__. _TIG ARD SAMA"DMI RIC I
S,
co.cnocMx E%.XP%TrD ►ND ArPMOitO
II
r
� I
4A
i
Address&q", /L'1 tcN J"A Permit No.
Name of 0-7urant Permit chargs— —_—.
N�
wunection fe*
------ -- Paid by.� — 7
--- --------___--- ---.__-- Date connected
Type of AuildiaqInspection fee _
1
Service Rate__—�--� _ Paid by Date :1
t;ontrector— —__ —
Assessment-
Sim
ssessment J-- _Paid
Sim of cjnnCction_--___. - —
I
SEWER PERMIT 34575
V '
Unified SeweenpeAgeney CITY OF Tioard DATE 10-23-87
of Washington County
OWNER, John Mr�,nnan PHONES ,39-1722
OWNER' S ADDRESSe 11495 SW Greenhura Rd. 97223
TYPE OF INSTALLATION,
lei BUILDING SEWER ❑ LINE TAP AND BUILDING SEWER ❑ LINE TAP
TYPE OF OCCUPANCY,
® NEW ❑ EXISTING Q SINGLE =AMILf ❑ CCY0c„CiAL
❑ "CULT. ;E5 . ❑ 'i0�5'?i
FIXTURE UNITS DWELLING UNITS 1
ADDRESS OF STRUCTURE , 11495 SW Greenburg Rd. 97223
Penna Conditions: The applicant agrees to comply with all rules and regulations of the Unified
Sewerage Agency. when calling for an inspection, please refer to the Permit NunCer. The Permit
expires one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of issuance. The total amount paid (permit
fee, connection charge, line tap fee and/or other charge) will be forfeited if the permit expires.
The Agen%:y does not ;us-nntee the accuracy of the location of side sewer laterals. if the s"-r
is not located at the measurement given, the installer shall prospvc t three feet in all lirecv or;
from the distance given. If not so located, the installer shalt aurchase a 'Tap and )ioe Sewe:'
Permit at the current charge and the Agency will install a lateral.
FEES, XXZXXX2ffXdVXconverting
PERMIT FEE s 35.00 single family dwelling
to duplex
CONNECTION CHARGE 1, 100.00
LINE TAP 1`+STALL T I;.;. _
i55,�EO 5y
OTHER 1 , 135.00
TOTAL s _ -- DATE OF ISSUANCE
APPLICANT DATE OF EXPIRATION
SEWER PERMIT
i
TAX 'AAP 1S135CU, 14X L; . L). , C71ON
LOT BLOCK OF
BCR 10-23-87
APPROVED BY DATE ISSUED BY � LATE _7F iSSUAN,_
D. U. ' S i_ _ 1 _-- 7F"Aq4 " min . s ewer lino :_,,gci . BP 815 -- - --
1F
1 . fhr? proper (.y fronLs (;rvonburg Rued in has two oxIitiny Accesses .
Greenburg Road is designated as a inalor collector and currently
has !"Co feet of right-ofuay, two traffic lanes, and no curbs ur
sidewalks Half-street improvemunts to Greenburg Road will not be
required at this time. A waiver of remonstrance agreement,
executed by the aoplicant, for future improvement of Greenburg
Road ihall be recoru!d.
2. The two accesses will be allowed ot•to Greenbury Road providod that
th,-y are signed as "Entrance Oniy" and "Exit Only" and ,he currant
width is maintained at the property line as shown on the suhmitted
,plan. The accesses shall be paved and tapered to 25 feet of wi,ith
at the road. The entrance snall ue tapered to the north and the
exit tapered to the youth.
3. ile accesses d,.) not conform to visual clearance ,area requirements
of the Cumnunity, Development Code due to tho existence of the
Fence and trees and shrub- on the right-of-way and on private
property. However, the Erkjineering Division believes that sight
clearance for the entrance should provide adequate safety for
traffic and pedestrians because autos will only be entering from
Greenburg Road at this point and thus will not be impacted by the
visual obstructions. The exit does not hate adequat visual
clearance to the south. At a minimum the small , pruned cr_ r Bind
fence post and rail in t ,e right-of-.lay must be removed. A field
visit by the Engineering Division will be required to determine
the extent of necessary clearing when the axil is opened to
traffic. Additional clearing, including removal of some fa-rirq
and Landscaping will be necessary ,.t the time of road widening. r.t
4. The property currently has sanitary sewer service to the rear of
the property. Sanitary sewer connection permits are required for
the additional units . Connections shall be according to the
Uniform Plumbing Code,
S. The property urrrent1y has on-site s torm/dra i nag,) retention
consisting of a 1()'x20'xlB' deep, earth covFred, rock filled
reservoir. The existing system, reported by the applicant to be
functioning adequately, shall be allowed to remain. However, if
the system shall fail and cause storm drainage to flow onto
adjacent property, an alternate method shall be required.
No other comnents w(ro received.
9 nNaLVSIS AND CONCLUSION
Existing site conditions provide the proposed development with necessary
improvements to ratisfy Community Development Code (CDC) standards for
parking, landscaping, storm drainage, access to public transit, privacy,
and private outdoor areas. The use proposed, multi-Family residential, is
(' a permitted use in the R-12 zone. The 0.4 acre parcel prnvides adequate,
area for the 4 units proposed. Other Code requtroments whit.h must also be
satisfied and which require further discussion include access, visual
clearance area, the height of the fence, and yard setback requirements.
NOTICE OF DECISION -- SDR 98-43, Variance 89-04 •- John Drennan - PAGE 3
7GWin.M ►•r MPI! I
CITYOFT167ARD DEAMI'1' N(). • 5B0f3A46/
�� UATE 255UED 3/ 16i1314
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEPARTMENT °"'O' PRIM. I%M f .NO 1900464
171;5!{W MM Blvd,.P 0 cion 73391•Tigard.Omgon 972Z1.(w3l mAi7s
1,1.J. �nnGL:i''i_1 t al+Y1 e.,i ,_cam r1,ul roL-AO
Ilex M111'!L.(;T 151:1:'fCC)c'0i' SUH LT SK
L ANL) UsF. RIP t
4o'r ej.jzE.
SECTION: 3Rr T WI`' A RN(: w
Wtlt)K I:1 r".Ir. N) W
USE 1'YC'F SINGLL KAM11.,Y
111►.r a+at7lt].tr:ant atgraeevr Ll.l r.l�mhlrl with nail r•ulors rand regulratiunv of thcp Urrl.+ led
Seewer,ago Agency Tho pe@r•n1tt. ►expires 120 drays from the date i%sue`ci. Thier cottl
nreounI I31"lltri will bey forfuitears 141 ttto pol•mit eexpirres1 , 11tae Agenr_q riotsa not g11ar-
vanteee this JICc1ll`aae:IJ o1 the location of the side sower lateral% IF thra srrwor 11c
Itnt lclr_,htr.•d rRt• t,t10 mel;adyurer.mt•nt givren , than invrtaaliwi. vhrrill prospect ,1 fr-ie,t in '
all dirinc tl.onrs from thw tit-Atanev ttivan . If not iso located, Oho initt,tller• -shall
(eurrhnr+�► a "1wp sari 51dp Sewrr" petrol ta►nd thrl± Agen.'y will instka] 'l L. ].ItNrn r
I
I '
tat:-LA" r ,Nr;- AWFA — -
II �i
DWELLING
IN.I . tt.N:+N f IMpI�OVEr;ct�T
nWELLINL'iN(: UN11'S . t
NO OF W-Di,S 1
I
i ,Instil w PFRM71 -- R,;5 0U
U 11495 sw I,]rrerrlbulir rd CONNEM'i0N f:HAFIGkE eI t , t00 . 00
N tit,latlf•tl ur 51'!c'a.-13 LINE TAP INSIW.L.
E PHONL' (503 1 639_579:
A
OTWF Fi
C
O
N
T
A
A I
C I
T WTAL 111 , t:s`1 0'1 1
O
0 I
Thw Oerf"„t•v $sued sublPtt 10 the rngulAllons cnnlaimpj en r,tl@ 14 PH nisi l NEU ;N�t•'hC'I l Ut�1,
of Ine r►dC Male of Oregon spec-ally Codes lanm')togulAO0ns PntJCW-IN
And ell oche• apprtcabte codes And orrlmAnces and it is hereby
agreed thgl the work will by 10ftO,n 3CCr1rdAnC@ wdh the plans Ind
so@c1hca"e" and ` COTpbanCO Mrlh All 40011C8ble -Odea and
Ordinances rho!IiIuAMC@ Of IMIS Znrm,l does not v1r8sve resth0live
cOvenanls C0MlrAc'9r nM lubcun'rset0rs Spall hA,.a!Current etty
bu1010sa c,ta rW'• !% Tti ti -o• ! -11 etprre and become null And
'r,n'f w:•v is M ;ln':t",v•':.•r,t99 els or'l work,S%uspenlorl n!
Ahanr70ned at a Wlr,'d if ISO AAvs any time After worts has I
COrn Tented It SMAO!10 te,.respnnsrb+lify Ol tap perrhiltet to Assure
UI'Pau"Od,nlpech0nt vri rAtiuestad 3rid approved
601
Per "' v�n,•
L.1 U. F• IMM T►ggrl:.rt tUN 63r/ -pi t 13
ts�,,,•,l rT. .:r
SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WOl.K OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE
hI:AMITSFfdEQ sPE6"jjll
CITY OF TIGrA RD �tv�1v ,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT °"' SATE ISSUED. 6/c_3/UB
PRIM PMT.NO,N0. HF)04f�A
1312SSw Man3La 90 Oe.23»r TiWa0f.oaf+im.(W3163+.,re I
.1c:G AODNF--SS 114h3 ,W a4EFNF3UAC RO r. USA NUM3EA: 3936
1AX MAt•/LCIr 1S135L:D202 SL:B. L.r . SK ,
LAND LIST= . 1412
L C!T 5 1•J.F :
eiKc r ION 3"1 rWP s ANG . u
WANK CI.ASS . NEW
tISE rYpE: SINGLE FAMILY
1hf., app liatunt nclrc,4vs tcl comply with .111 rulrrra ilrld rejullatiurla of tht, Uclified
I ';uwermijo Aguncy . rho permit expirtr•• 120 dayis front thea datr c.s3utttd . The total
I
.-Lmciunt, pri.0 will be 41'nr41tti.tcvd if thra ;lrerinit aspire-1 rhe Agency doets not gumo-
4nL*90 tht, laCcuracy of chit local ion of the !Sidi?' -lower- lwtel•al's If the %ewer is
not. located ut the memmurement given , th.a instraller %Mall prospect .5 feet in
.-t11 diractlons from the diytunr_cr 17iven . If not !So located , the in It I ler •aha1L
purr_hti•\e a "Tap and Stde Sewer" permit and the Agency wt11 install w 1,ctteral .
INSrALI_ . TYPE: BULLUCN(; SE.sIEFl IMPERVIOUS APE:A
V CXTI11iE; UN1T :3 . TENANr LMPPOVEMF.,N1
DUEL L_l Nr: UN c r i . 1
No nF FiLUGS . 1
I I
FEE Si
(, drFnnan john 1.t RE:AMIT
%� 1.1495 ria yrttcnbuyr rd CUNNECTION CHArir;C t1 , 1C0 00
u
ti tig+ •11 or 972P3 LINE 'rnP INST01 L
El I PHONr= (003) 639-579c!
07 rt
c�
I TI
a
� I
Q _ I r(1 rAL. $1 , :00 00
4
PE CI 1 tit NO
i hr3 nn.. . \a .m. rt'•.r'ry .tit. ..h.,l.1 t'C^S..)^'Ln,••3.n TIIn IS .• -�_.___._..---.�-._......_.�....
',1 •hn 't!� -•1'+ •'.r'.✓tu^ "•Or•r,1tr C7Jr3 :1n,n,1 •POlualnn5
Inri .l i • '^„ .::!.r y.o .9'tp3 1n•( pr�,na^rrS 1n1 i! a n�rPbV
L�,n„t,^t.. „r, .• n pa. ^f .n ncC lhta^'�.rah,•t r'pot^4.lnt
aper ' 1• ..a 1^. ^r.,�^LP r►,lh .tn 11•N,r.M'n coa-,; anc
:/:1!•tgry�a ^n .\a,nl^r.n•;1•�\Lyr•nit dCrs n•,1 e.hN?
10.5tr,c1 vQ
IV
I
. Nr,' r, •• .•,,.,,I Mrw,..•41 Llr3 v, '..n.• �3L-oemlydJt
,t+.l••!:^r•• , f ''•! .1 t4J btr3 1^. h"n 1!Inl hilt tl h,13
5W• ..«.«r...•,.. ,. .,,,•.r 'ua,lnaMbty:J!,l;ur-t,!I,rr(n dSl Utn
CALL Fein 1N',t>l_Tl0N 639--4171I III
i
SEPARATE PERMITS REQU!AED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBEL ABOVE
One Lincoln Center,Suite 240
10300 SW Greenburg Road 7�d
ofie Portland,Orevon 97223
Attorney at Law _ Telephone(503),152-6068
June 12 , 1995 Facsimile(503)452-6168 h�d. s/,65
Mr. David Scott
Building official
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, Oregon 972.23
RE: John Drennan/Thomas & Sharon Hastings
Private sewer dispute
Dear Mr. Scott:
On the request of my clients, Mr. and Mrs. Thomas D.
Hastings, I am providing for your review a copy of a letter
addressed to Mr. Kimball H. Ferris, Esquire, attorney for Mr. John
Drennan. Mr. and Mrs. Hastings live in a single family home
located on Lewis Lane off of 95th Avenue in Tigard. Mr . Drennan is
one of several owners of a multifamily commercial residential
property located on Greenburq Road which is parallel. to Lewis Lane,
also in the Ct,y of n card. I am informed that Mr. Drennan ' s
property was converted from a single family residence to a
multifamily fourplex development several years dqo.
Mr . Drennan has attempted to force Mr. and Mrs. Hastings
to discoltinue their use of a private sewer line running through
the Hastings pror.erty through the use of a City plumbing inspector.
The City plumbing .inspector contends that Mr. . Drennan has a non-
psblic (private', exclusi•,-e easement over and through the Hastings
property for the purpose of providing a sewer connection from his
multifamily unit:3 on Greenburq Road to the public sewer on Lewis
Lane. The Hastings disagree with that contention, particularly
since Mr. Drennan has a public sewer line to his disposal on
v�nbllrij Gau .`Gi" .:Gyne( L1Cy with nls I?lll: ifa111i1y un its On
Greenburq Road , :tnd as set forth in the letter to Mr. F'erris.
My clients request that you nr the appropriate City
official responsible for the City plumbing inspectors require that
the City discontinue any further interference with their property
rigl,ts in th -.s matter. My clients do not wish to be bothered with
and will not tolerate City inspectors attempting to come onto their
property to enforce some nonpublic and filous purported pri,,r- `-
property right. i
r on
LBE: lbe
Enclosure
CC: Mr. and Mrs. Hastings
One Lincoln Center,Suite 240
(—/,T n103
00 SW Greenburg Road
- ./'woal( aelz , Portland,Oregon 97223
Attorney at Law Telephone(503)452.6068
June 12 , 1 ,�1 5 Facsimile(303)452-6168
Mr. Ni.mba.11 H. Ferris
Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Perdergrass & Hoffman, P. C.
Attorneys at Law
300 Pioneer Tower
888 SW Fifth Avenue
Po,tland, Oregon 97204-2089
RF: Tom & Sharon Hasr.i.ngs/John Drennan
Dear Mr. Ferris:
This letter confirms my telephone call to your secretary,
Faye, on June 6, 1995 and my conversation with you by telephone on
the same date. When I first called your office, you were blisv and
I left a messagt for you with your secretary. You returned my call
approximately an hour later on the same day.
In the first call , I asked your secretary to inform you
of my call and that:
( 1) I represented Mr. and Mrs. Hastings in the John Drennan
matter; and
(2 ) Mr. Drennan' s position on the exclusive use of a private
sewer line through the properties of Lewis and Hastings is not well
taken; and
(3) Mr. and Mrs. Hastiiqs have as much right or a superior
right as and to John Drennan ' s use of a private sewer runnincx
through a purported sewer easement across the Hastings ' property ;
and
(4) Mr. Drennan ' s right to use the sewer or purported easement
has probably been terminated by the use of Mr . and Mrs . Hastings .
In my later telephone conversati(-.,n with you, you asked
what legal basis I had for my communications to your secretary
concerning the matters listed above . T advised you that Mr.
Drennan did no•.: have exclusive use of the easement and that his
right to use the easement, if any, was terminated through the use
of Mr. and Mrs . Hastings over the prescribed period of time for a
prescriptive right to the easement.
Mr. Kimball H. Ferris
.June 12 , 1995
Page 2
In my research of the facts of this case, a nonexclusive
easement for a sewer through the Hastings property was provided
during 1967 to the predecessors in interest the Drennan, etal
property by the predecessors in interest to the Castings propert;",
for a very specific purpose to assist the prior owner of a single
family home in dra? ninq a watershed and septi. tank run off. 'I'iiere
was no public sewer along Greenburg Road at that time; there is
now. In addition, Mr. Drennan and the other owners of the :�r.ennan
property have constructed a multifamily dwelling ( fourpl.ex) an the
property requiring several sewer connections to the public sewer
along Greenburg Road. Not only have the Hastings ' been using the
sewer line through their property connecting to a public sewer. on
Lewis Lane for an extended period c�f time, th:-. over 311
circumstances have changed dramativall; since 1967 .
Tne Hastings and Lewis single house families had as much
right to use the sewer line as did the Drennan single house family
at the time each was using it for the purposes grantedn ,.he
easement. Those purposes have changed. If ~he City eventually
had some provision denying multi-propery use of the same pr;vate
sewer line, the Hastings ' use of the sewer line was preemptive of
the Drennan use of the line, particularly since Drennan eventually
had a public sewer on Greenburg Road. There was no longer any
necessity t-o use the private sewer through the Hastings ' property.
Although Mr. Drennan did not have an exclusive easement
on the Hastings property, if he had, his right would have been
terminated by the prescriptive use of Mr. and Mr. Hastings over the
prescribed period of time. The Hastings ' use of the easement
meets the r.?quired elements of adverse possession aiid are superior
to any right of Drennan in this case. I suggest that Mr. Drennan
comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code, apparently in use by the
City of Tigard effective February 1., 1992 , and provide a sew%r
connection from his property to the public sewer on Greenburg Rjad
for his multifamily dwelling.
Your characterization of the Lewis and Hastings ::Lj_e-in"
as illegal are not well founded. I am surprised that you would be
so misguided by a client as to refer to the use of the sewer ' i.ne
in this case by either lewis or Hastings as illegal . In a further
correction of your ,June 2 , 1995 letter addressed to Mr. and Mrs .
Hastings, please be advises that Mr. Leya-tst refutes your comment
about disconnectincf his "illegal tie-in" or June 15 , ,1995 .
LBE: lbe B i n Eadie
CC: Clients
\ . \•
One Lincoln Center,Suite 240
//.. 10300 SW Greer,ourg Road
f /Yf�O�I 2l
lc�
Portland.Oregon 97223
Attorney at Law Telephone(503)452-6068
August 18, 1995 Facsimile(503)452.6168
Mr. David Scott, P. E.
Building Official
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Thomas & Sharon Hastings
Private sewer dispute
Dear Mr. Scott:
I have received and reviewed a copy of your letter of
August 7 , 1995 to "T. D. Hasting, 9555 SW Lewis Lane, Tigard, OR
97223 . " I am surprised that you would send such a letter to Mr.
Hastings, particularly since you have not responded to my letter to
you of June 12 , 1995.
The first and third sentences of your letter. to T. D.
Hasting, referen-ed above, are not factually correct. Mr. and
Mrs. Hastings have not connected the dwelling located at 9555 SW
Lewis Lane to the public sanitary setter system via an exist,*_ng
private sewer li.tte located in a private sanitary sewer easement on
their property. Your second sentence is nonsense for the reason
indicated herein.
Apparently your references to varic;us requirements under
the Tigard Municipal Code and the Unified Sewo -age Agency in your
lettE.r to T , D. Hasting, as would apply to the dwelling of Mr. . and
Mrs . Hastings located at 9555 SW Lewis bane, in the City of Tigard,
are in error. In fact, it app,-:ars that you are attempting to
ur la: ff:1. ccc c^ d ,�r� t
�,, ,t
._1 r ..r. =r. ? __. .�s �!;c, i' o -`-u:^. Lnr;
responsibility for the acts of others that affect their property or
into performing acts inconsistent with their property rights.
My clients request a meeting with the appropriate City
department officals or trte City Council, as necessary, to discuss
your letter to T. D. Hasting and the implications contained therein.
I do riot believe that my clients would want to meet with you alone
because of your obvious bias and apparent lack of concern for their
property rights in this matter. Incidentally, and based on my
conversations with the Unified Sewerage Agency located in
iii1lsboro, Oregon, and review of its regulations, your reference to
the Unified Sewerage Agency requirements in these circumstances do
not have any me-ic. I am very concerned about your lack of
knowledge and inability to properly investigate and proceed on the
concerns raised 1.n my letter of June 12 , 1995 .
r
Mr. David Scott, P. E.
August 18 , 1995
Page 2
My clients and I look forward to your cooperation in
reaching a reasonable, effective and meaningful resolution of this
matter in an expeditious manner. Please address all future
correspondence relating to Mr. . and Mrs. Hastings and their property
located at 9555 SW Iotwi.s Lane in the, of Tigard to my office
address above.
F3r ' ton Eadie
LBE: lbe j
CC: Mr. and Mrs. Hastings j
One Lincoln Center, Suite 210
103CO SW Greenburg Road
f 2rittvn vaell� Portland_Oregon 97223
Telephone(503)452-6068
Attornev at Law
October 3 , 1995
Mr. David Scott, P.E.
Building Official.
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Hasting and Lewis (Lewis Lane)
vs. Drennan (Greenburg Read)
Dear Mr. Scott:
As You may recall from our telephone conversation of
August 21, ith
1995, we discussed the City of Tigard' ssewer onceline rns wand
Mr, and Mrs. Hasting' s purported use of a p rivate sewer. line
Mr. Drennan' s claim to an exclusive use oft pI understood from
running through the Hasting/Lewis properties. ineer.s that Mr.
that conversation that you would advise the City eng
Drennan does not have an "exclusive" use easement overo e
rthrough
the Hasting/Lewis properties. I also understood that yexpected
some Court of appropriate jurisdiction to eventually decide whethhad
er
any of the parties to this dispute (Hasti.ng, Lewis or Drennan)
an exclusiveor non-exclusive use to the purported sewer easem,2nt
and thrt decision would decide what happens with use of the sewer
by Mr. Drennan.
our
I informed n,; Hosting)r clients (Mr. and Mrs. ° ying
comments and concerns on Lhat: date. Although
Iha se hearnow dnnothing
from you subsequent to that conversation, my
Mr . and Mrs. Lewis, have been served with summons and complaint
from and throug17 Mr Drennan' s attorneys, specifically Paul U.
✓r; t 1 crgt i pr of Mr. Drerrlan are
am concerned,
without merit and will respond accordingly.
however, that the City' s recent correspondence in this matter is
Tigard
copied to Paul D. Migchelbrink. HOW .is the oity o
lved with Mr .
associated with Mr . Migchelbrink or of
Drennan in this matter?
nce r
on Eadie
LBE: lbe /
CC: Clierts
PLA MAP
%';P 1 S I-15 CD-004 00
SEE nnA
I S I 35 CA S'
w � b
0
JBGc 600 \ -
500
4640
�
Ac
R q p —7--'
o v I o 300
E
-'°0 C S 10506
Ic s 20-9 :;? 202 I .
4G
" 4
r_ - \\I I I r r (�• Z 1 N llttryw
—
200 r = 2
W e
is all
_ f B05 ° 94w �f220 �. ..�_ _
� j 205 NI `•
e,s 3500 i 3601 3600 cliqj
?
� a
3 `
O 7 N J U
ani __
90 OC o 0-
17C 3 ,i2 1 i t `/fie_ v�2a�ti ?c Z 60 78 fO�B
194c Zc 'Ic
2 3x00 a� SW LEWI L
- 3 000 2900
2f
' 3100
• 9 °2
b 300 J2 OC a nu
T
a 3 * 4 S � a
ry • f,
N 21
• H
h e v•J1 t I •:�
tT�rack �i. xannn & 55IICItttCF --
ej
e Imo.
SArIX0 53t•I Ti S-@ 1'12•
WARRANTY DEED — S.ATLITQRV Fo;ry
(111d,vldual Or COrpor:LOnl
� '77 8616
PICIIAPII .. rAUL and Diwm r. 1'ML, huabe4d —d .if.
c 31Amor Conveys ane Rarre,lt a JOHN W. DkLMNAN
B �
�rAMee me lumrm0 a0scnbce gra,O"Do",nee of encuma'antef
tAPCLL 11
IA tract of land 1n tat S• DOEMIEM'S ADUITION To L�Olitel M[IOR'#,
..,1 a duly reeOrAed subdivision In Weshington County, Oregm. vre
n particularly described as tollevni
I_ ne91nni" at a r+olnt On the Wo@t 'in' of Said tot S, South 0. 01'
West 1101.1 feet and North #9. 19' Last 220.77 feat anA North O•
Ol' _oat 150 fret !tow U•e initial point and Uu Nurtl,wat cornet
..r —04 en.w.nn•t arvn lTinN• •wen.•. wn.•w n• nt• r..• .Inn.I the west Sino of maid Lot S, a Aletanco of 220.2 feet to a point In the
caun of Oouth.set OrOOnlouag 'bad 'County Ro.J N0. 17911 Lben.*
South 70• 49' :.set along the center of eald road 1:3.07 fret to the
.,,rr1-1 L—,n•r Sal that trete to •raft Je—rl LuJ il, J..J to Li..@tur
1% Klock. at in. rse0[dad Deeteufer 11. 1960. In ono. Uri, Pave Tao,
WAXIIInatoi. COun;y Feud Peeordal thanCO South 0. 01' West @long Lhu
W-6 Slues of mAIJ K1uaA Tra.L 194.0 faaL to lila South—L rerner
tIN•rrofl L1loncs Suuth 07. 1)' Wsat 110.71 fest to the polnt of
be•Ilnnlnrf, raeeptlnq thorafron the Suutr, e2 feet cherrof dr deaCCILed
In MIM' to Conroe. r., Lr.le. et us• recorded s:ptemm. 6. 1967• Ih
coal .17 , r..to 76. nald Deed Record@.
P,i�11_LL 1 f 1 1401 1+ I1..uel.eetr� Steer'
Fr. ,,.J -
An onarrrent fr• ee,eor purposes@ und••r and .icroso thn follovinq
J.eorit.d tract,
Com.l.neirn .0 A 1,olnt in the South line of Lot S. #OC ign'S ADDITION
tc CUEN11Ur. IRICIMS, a duly romrded plat to Ws@hingt.on County,
Ofegonl sold point beihq South #9. 19• West. 155.3#S feet *at of
L1C :outhc32t earner o! :old Lot S. thence 9nr•h tntc tan
f OD t0 t 11 0 tris noint Of beglMingl thence North C•'1' We@C 12
/ ;oast: thtnce South #9. 19' west 15 foot, the net South C• 3' Cart 12
feet, thanro DOrth #9. 19• Cast 15 feet to the lrolnt of trgtnnlnn
PARCEL III-
/
hn .ar"ent for @esr purposes under and •eros■ the "attrly 10
itet of even width of the fQ,10+inq described trset�
7eglnnlnq at the Couthesot corner o! la: S• ! ^^••!!•! AC^!
C RL EN#VPG MEIMMS, Washington Co.lnty, Ortaon.^thenr.e South 89' 19"
Nest •long the South line of said tat S. 100 to An iron rod a`••I
marRinq a true point of btalnninq of this de.cription: thence South
89. 19" Nest along the South line of said Lot S. 60.1#5 feet to • �'••r
p0inti thence North O. 1• Get ISO feet to n po Lnt, thence %or_, 8
69. 19' East. 60.1#S feet to a point) thence South 0. /1• West• to
the point of b*gjminq.
t�rnr� 3�i. �n7nnn � �850CIiItCS ----- - --
-..l
1&819
_ ----� 3 - S 71
_BULLIVANT HOUSER
BAILEY
PEND_ERGRASS
_&
HQI'AMAN 300 Pioneer Tower Fax 15031295-0915
A PROFESSIONAL Ct MIGRATION HHH S.W.Fifth Avenue Cable Address Portlaw
ATTORNEYS AT LAW Portland,OR 97204 2089
15031228.6351
PAUL 1) MIt1CIIFIBRINK
Dirilct Dinl I60.11 400 4474
March 20, 1996
VIA FACSIMILE AND REGULAR MAIL
Mr. L. Britton Eadie
Attorney /tat Law
5695 Hood Street
West Linn, OR 97068
Re : John Drennan v. Thomas D. Hasting, et al
Washington County Circuit Court No. D952621C_V
Dear Mr. Eadie :
As per Allen Reel ' s letter of March 14 , 1996, the
hearing on your client' s motions to dismiss, strike, and make
more definite and certain has been scheduled for April 3 , 1996 .
Mr. Reel has scheduled the arbitration hearing on the merits for
April 18, 1996 . I wish to take the depositions of your clients
following the motion hearing. I am available to condu -t the
depositions on April 4 , 5, 8, 9 or 10 . Please contact your
clients and lFt me know as soon as possible which of these dates
you prefer. In addition, please advise as to where the
depositions should be conducted. Of course, our offices are
available if you wish. I realize that the outcome of the motion
hearing may force us to change the deposition ac,!edule . However,
unless the hearing results in a complete dismissal of 141. .
Drennan' s claims, I intend to move forward with the depositions .
Very truly ,yours,
lie�Z te�,�_A_
Paul D. Migchelb.r. i.nk
PDM:
cc : John Drennan
David Scott,
Paul Elsner
P O R T 1. A N D • S A C R A M E N T O • S E A T T L E • V A N C 0 I' 1' F R
5695 Hood Street
West Linn, Oregon 97068
Attorney at Law Telephone(503)650-2998
March 18 , 1996 Facsimile(503)650-3665
Mr. Paul D. Migchelbrink
Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pendergrass & Hoffman, P.C.
Attorneys at Law
300 Pioneer Tower
888 SW Fifth Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97204-2089
RE: Drennan vs. Hasting & Lewis, etal
WCDC D95-2621CV
Dear Mr. Migchelbrink:
I have your letter of March 18 , 1996, purportedly
addressing the meeting of our respective clients and ourselves with
Mr. Scott and Mr. Elsner, on March 12 , 1996. Of importance is the
fact that you failed to indicate that the meeting was called by Mr.
Scott on behalf of the City of Tigard. In Mr. Elsner ' s words,
"the meeting was not called as a discovery too] for anyone, but an
effort to get the parties together to discuss the issues from the
City's perspective. "
My clients and I have not admitted anything other than
they have a legal right to use and maintain their real property as
they wish, not as your client would want. As I indicated in my
previous letter, Mr. Scott opened the meeting with a rendition of
his "facts" regarding the location of buildings and alleged
connections on the three properties. We discovered very quickly
that his "facts" were not necessarily correct. The meeting
continued after correcting the general layout of the three
properties in respect to the private sewer line. Mr. Scott
specifically identified Mr. Drennan's property as a commercial
development property consisting of two (2) separate buildings
encompassing four (4) units, whereas the Lewis and Hasting
properties are single family residential properties. In addition,
Mr. Scott alluded to various permits (we never saw the permits)
dating apparently from 1957 to 1989 . Some of those permits, in
fact, were attributed to the residential properties of Mr. and Mrs.
Hasting and Mr. and Mrs . Lewis. Mr. Drennan's property is not a
residential single family property.
I do not agree with your assertions of what Pir. Scott
explained or intended in his comments, and I further disagree with
your self-serving comments about what you, Mr. Elsner, Mr. Scott
and Mr. Drennan were prepared to discuss. Apparently it was your
intent to attempt to intimidate or coerce my clients into an
Mr. Paul D. Migchelbrink
March 18, 3996
Page 2
untenable circumstance. Mr. Drennan has not been 'Crying to
resolve anything other than "have his own way and do what he will
on other people's property. " You should know by now that Mr.
Drennan has no superior right to the use of my client's properties
for his commercial purposes, regardless of how you word it. In
fact, I have already advised you that any right Mr. Drennan may
have had, at any timne, has been extingushed by the prescriptive
use of my clients and by the law of adverse possession. In that
regard, the City is now aware that a Court "may" terminate Mr.
Drennan's use of the Hasting/Lewis property for any reason, or
"may" allow all three (3) of the property owners to use the private
sewer line and maintain it for as long as it is connected to a
public sewer. Mr. Drennan's tactics won't work. He may try to
work it out with my clients, if he wants, but his time is running
out. Tn my opinion, he Is going to have to connect his commercial
properties to the public sewer on Greenburg Road, and not to Lewis
Lane through other people's properties. We do not agree with your
resolution to this dilemma.
I don't think I need advise you that if My client ' s
properties are damaged by any adjacent or subjacent drainage,
runoff or overflow from your client's property, he will be held
accountable for such damage. Those costs could be substantial.
Apparently the City has studied the problem for some
considerable period of time. Because it does not want to await
the outcome of whatever lawsuit may be filed in this matter, Mr.
Scott has indicated that the City intends to take the onl , course
it can in the present circumstances. I think you and your client
need to plan for that eventuality, either now or later. I further
think your continuous threats of litigation will "backfire" on you
very shortly.
My clients are still willing to talk with Mr. Drennan,
but Mr. Drennan's use of my clients properties is short-lived, in
or out of Court. Please pass that on '_o your client.
Si cer y,
on Eadie
LBE: Ibe
CC, Clients
Mr. David Scott
Mr. Paul Elsner
5695 Hood Street
West Linn, Oregon 97068
Attorney at Law Telephone (503)650-2998
March 13, 1996 Facsimile(503)650-3665
Mr. David Scott, P. E.
Building Official.
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: City of Tigard Dispute
with Drennan, Hasting & Lewis over use of private
sewer line connected to public sewer- _line.
Dear Mr. Scott:
My clients, Mr. and Mrs. Lewis and Mr. and Mrs. Hasting,
and I are concerned that our meeting with you, Mr. Elsner, Mr. '
Drennan and Mr. Micghelbrink at 3 : 30 p.m. on March 12 , 1996, may
not be properly recorded. There did not appear to be any method
of recording the comments, statements or decisions of the parties,
including the City, to this dispute or the opinions of counsel for
the parties present at the meeting, except as may be deduced from
the contemporaneous notes of the participants. In that regard, I
recorded the events of the meeting as carefully and accurately as
possible, under- the circumstances.
My notes reflect the following general understanding,
conclusions and decision of the City of Tigard in resolving the
dispute over the use of the private sewer line to its satistaction,
after a brief discussion with counsel for the parties to the
dispute concerning the eventual impact of Court decisions on the
dispute:
In the cords of Mr. Scott, "a;~:fir reviewing the C:Ocumerri-S
on file and discussion with counsel , the property owners (Drennan,
Hasting & Lewis) will have thirty (30) days, from the date of the
meeting [April 12 , 1996] , to confer and reach an amicable agreement
among themselves as to who will have use of the private sewer line
in question, as presently connected to the public sewer line along
Lewis Lane. If the parties have not conferred and reached an
amicable agreement that is acceptable to the City of Tigard within
thirty (30) days; from the date of the meeting, the City will
disconnect the private sewer line from the public sewer_ line on
Lewis Lane and will thereafter require each property owner
connecting to said private sewer line to remove any connections
thereto. The City realizes the disconnection from the public
sewer will deprive two properties [on Lewis Lane] and the four
commercial development units [not on Lewis Lane] from connecting to
the public sewer on Lewis Lane from the private sewer line. "
Mr. David S,:ott, P.E.
March 13 , 1596
Page 2
Apparently Mr. Scott had the benefit of counsel in reaching the
decision indicated above as the decision of the City of. Tigard.
My clients and I did notargue with that decision and there being
no apparent basis for further discussion, left the meeting.
In the interest of facilitating the decision of the City
of Tigard, Mr. Drennan is welcome to personally contact my clients
in an amicable and reasonable manner, as often as he likes or they
tolerate, during the next thirty (30) days to discuss use of the
nr.ivate sewer line, as is presently connected to the public sewer
line along Lewis Lane. This invitation ends thirty (30) days from
todays date and will not be renewed without good cause. We will
expect the City of Tigard to comply with its decision in this
matter. , as stated herein, without further recourse.
Sincerely, a
L. Y� ltonEadie
LBE: lbe
CC: Mr. and Mrs. Hastings
Mr. and Mrs. Lewis
Mr. David Scott (for the City of Tigard)
Mr. Paul Elsinore
Mr. Pau; Micghelbrink (for Mr. Drennan)
CITYOF TIGARD _ MECHANICAL PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PERMIT#: MEC2002 00230
DATE ISSUED: 6/5/02
13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 PARCEL: 1 S135CD-00201
SITE ADDRESS: 09575 SW LEWIS LN
SUBDIVISION: BOETCHERS ADDITION ZONING: R-4.5
BLOCK: LOT: 005 JURISDICTION: TIG
CLASS OF WORK: OTR FLOOR FURN: EVAP COOLERS:
TYPE OF USE: SF UNIT HEATERS: VENT FANS:
OCCUPANCY GRP: R3 VENTS W/O APPL: VENT SYSTEMS:
STORIES: BOILERS/COMPRESSORS HOODS:
FUEL TYPES 0 - 3 HP: 1 DOMES. INCIN:
LPG 3 - 15 HP: COMML. INCIN:
MAX INPUT: BTU 15 - 30 HP: REPAIR UNIT'S:
FIRE DAMPERS?: 30 - 50 HP: WOODSTOVES:
GAS PRESSURE: 50 * HP: CLO DRYERS:
FURN < 100K RTU: 1 _ AIR HANDLING UNITS_ OTHER UNITS:
FURN >=100K BTU: <= 10000 cfm: GAS OUTLETS: 1
> 10000 cfm:
Remarks: Replace furnace, gas lines and a/c unit.
Owner: ----- FEES --
L EWIS, DAVID E + MARSHA E TRS Type By Date Amount Receipt
9575 SW LEVVIS LN PRMT CTR 6/5/02 $72.50 272002e00C
PORTLAND, OR 97223 5PCT CTR 6/.5/02 $5.80 2720020000
Total —$78.30 _
Phone:
Contractor:
COLUMBIA HEATING + COOLING INC
8900 SW BURNHAM
TIGARD, OR 97223 _ REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
Cas Line Insp
Phone:624-2704 Heating Unt Insp
Reg #: LIC 76359 Cooling Unt Insp
PLM 34-175 Final Inspection
This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Tigard Municipal Code, State of Ore.
Specialty Codes and all other applicable laws. All work will be done in accordance with approved
plans. This permit will expire if work is not started within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended
for more than 180 days. ATTENTION: Oregon law requires you to follow rules adopted in the Oregon
Utility Notification Center. Those rules are set forth in OAR 952-001-0010 through OAR
952-OB1-0080. You mpy Obtain copies of these rules or direct questions to OUNC by calling
tsnl AR-Q119c) _ {1,
ISSA B \ � l Permittee S'gnature
Call (503) 09-4175 by 7:00 P.M. for inspections needed the next business day
P. 02
Mechanical Permit Application
rc�jecvuppl-it- apire data.Qtmit 110.*'o
City of Tigard P
AdfireclIt- 13 125!,N' HaII Blvd,Tigard,OR 97223
('11011c; (503) 639-4171 Wtu iujuiod: B) Receipt trit.,
Fax (503) 598-1960 Can Me no floymcilit type
Land USC Oppro\A. pellillt liu.:
74c�-, CJ Oulel.
0 1 A 2 family dwelling ciraccessory Q cu"liduslHill _j (.1mik J Tennni improvement
U New vollsinwoull
'R( IAL VALUAIJON SCHEDULF
JORS111E]INFORMATION
Job 321M
,OUC ` Indicequi jime lit quantities Ili boxes b t]
Ind; I' 11, (Illar
SuL Value of all 111MV11111CAl 'IMM1,111S.equipment, l0bur vmlicad
Taxnitipluix lot/LuxLtunt no Profil.Value
Lot. ]Block! Sul 0" S ee chackhm Veir important applic:ifint, inlormation and
Et d
Pro 111 narnc� yint, i(:tikIn'N lar SLhvdul�.- (ur rvsidemkil Dmi-it fcc
lunty, I &,Z I-ANUILI MULLING PERMIT FUE SCIIIED1111.1.
Ekxjlption and location of-jik on premisem: AcieMe-e,
lit.4ate of complent,"ll/Ilisrlion. 91, fie-, '1111) It.S )III,!
UNo Ali hundhili;U111" CTM
Tempt impri-imilcm 01 ClUllIgO Ur uselit A Is existing slocc insulated?J Y�: j I Alt conditioning(;lie 1T)ali required)
Alteration orexiollng system
iW
OI'loilet/compimulb IFIVIIANICAk CNIRACIUR Stala boilet t+ it „Business nRriir Hp
Jon I'l ULM
Address d0;-
W)4 0.3 1 ,7 SIII0kL III
.J City &A require
ills j tell it" tit narr hurner
CCD no 1110mbils duclworkArnt liner e$Q No
0101 llolie.—70: wall,I-11 flool 111411111led
--Mmml C-mur I tL n -e Ase- Pont oroapplin Wall ful bate
CONIACT Pt7k.%'UN Rebigermilant
Absorptionunits—_......._ 137'U/11
'q
Name! 0V ftWCA-1X-1
Cum ressnrx HP
Addrvbs:
-77— —, —
—'- EviviMmen at ou
City, stoic:' Appliance vent
OWNERuu s; Vrv*s kiivh�nlhazmiV
Nmit hood fire suppression system
hithmi-Ist fan with single duct tbith Luis)
-7s )er.c-mi-mj fit
tUPI PIP109 20d 111111511111bwon(Up to J"Ie6)
Tylle im!' (.)it
-Mgr—r-&fq—'�icv L mail. N(�j _
_j �aciadditi(iiiali)vet4oilil-t—s ' ' ---
LM 10,A m llriscir%%piping(schematic require d)
Nulllt;crof wjtlt.(�
7�=
nscil
011"rMcdopp'llifice or equIpmCni:
Drxormtjs,fijceiticc
t1 Cltt PC —'Akir f]Lc----
lk Wor.'(1b:tMinct sit)"c
Fa E-mail
APP11( tits signalLIP: Other
A�—PVIV�&— Other:
Nome (prints:
AVA12 !oApL.
.......
acre cWdl Mtb,PlplaneCAIIJUlillidilLUM rL4 Ovula inrollialitin Perrilit fcc ..... S
i
) Micittit NotICCL This permit lippkAimi Mininium fee- 11
(:"oil cud I)Utbblj expires if'h perinit is,im ubtulned Plan rt-%IcA,(at $
`Lpir4 widdii ISO Buys oftr It has been
me of CAM I it oh�Wi,67,clreTii ciiFir accepted as complete Suilr�%ir,.Ijargc
S TOTAL
COM,
MAY-26-02 11 : 13 AM P. 93
E0R 230397 T1911r0, OR 972aI.0- t,I
50'. b24 210A
r �
. r
r �
CITYOF TIGARD _ PLUMBING PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PERMIT#: /5/02 2-00197
6
13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 DATE ISSUED: 6/5102
SITE ADDRESS: 09575 SW LEWIS LN PARCEL: 1S135CD-00201
SUBDIVISION: BOETCHERS ADDITION ZONING: R-4.5
BLOCK: LOT: 005 JURISDICTION: TIG
CLADS OF WORK: OTR GARBAGE DISPOSALS: MOBILE HOME SPACES:
TYPE OF USE: S; WASHING MACH: BACKFLOW PREVNTRS:
OCCUPANCY GRP: R3 FLOOR DRAINS; TRAPS:
STORIES: WATER HEATERS: 1 CATCH BASINS:
FIXTURE=S LAUNDRY TRAYS: SF RAIN DRAIP.S:
SINKS: URINALS: GREASE TRAPS:
LAVATORIES: OTHER FIXTURES:
TUB/SHOWERS: SEWER LINE: ft
WATER CLOSETS: WATER LINE: ft
DISHWASHERS: RAIN DRAIN: ft
Remarks: Replace water heater.
FEES _
Owner:
Typo By Date Amount Receipt
LLWIS, DAVID E + MARSHA E TRS PRM1 CTR (3/13/C '/t $72.50 27200200000
9575 SW LEWIS LN r � $5.80 2.720020(�ODU
PORTLAND, OR 97223 5PCT CTR _C 5/(� —_
Total $78.30
Phone 1:
Contractor:
COLUMBIA HEATING + COOLING INC
PO BOX 230397
8900 SW BURNHAM ST STE E-110 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
TIGARD, OR 97281-0397 --- -- ------
Phone 1: 624-2704 Rough-in Insp
Reg #: LIC 76359 Final Inspection
PLM 34-175PB
1 his permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Tigard Municipal Code, State of OR.
Specialty Codes and all other applicable laws. All work will be done in accordance with approved plans.
This permit will expire if work is not started within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended for more
than 180 days. ATTENTION: Oregon law requires you to follow rules adopted by the Oregon Utility
Notification Center. Those rules are set forth in OAR 952-0001-0010 through OAR 952-0001-0080.
You may oHain copies of these rules or direct questions to OUNC by calling (503) 246-1987.
Issued By: y� �W'l-L Permittee Signature yt, _
Call (503) 4-4175 by 7:00 P.M. for an inspection needed the next business day
Plr,'�'- ,. -r��' l 1 1 ? ],t•t P. 04
i
Plumbing Permit Application
IJatc received; ' f 8 D j-' Permit no.: ',p{ GY«n/97
City of Tigard r � ~/ sewer +erntlt no: _
t Building permit no.:
AdaJrrss: 1315 SH' Nall Blvd,'1'ig;+tal.f)k )1_2i
Gty ol�f}gurd Phone; (503) 619 4171 Projcct/appl no: daft:
;, Fax: (503) 598-1960 MAY �4 /OW, Date isauctl. F2-YA�t
Land use approval 1__...
Caer:file no.: Payment type
1 2 family dwelling er accessory O Commercial/indutit J Mulu•family U Tenant impr]n•emrnt
U New construction Adr,]tlalt/allcrair, n plico.ntc n U Furxl service ❑Other:
1 ' ]
adtlresa: [M�c t1pllou (►t�. H'et ea. Cu(al
�icn 1 xnd1-;-•lntlly—d'+►e htgcnnl�:
U„ Suilt-no.: - (iorludr r110R.U.l�afh+r11I11)cnnnrrlinh)
lax lot/account no.. SFR(l)bath
- Bhxk Suhrllvisu+n• SM (2)Bath -
the flame - (3)�aih
/: ,ung.•� �t --�Zi!'' �� ' ch additional atlt/kitchcn -DUK16donn and 1 ation of work un lncnl'srs t�f�,�t,cc, V1a 6r H_ .Siteutililiey:
,k Catch basirt/area drain
)1 w g each line/trench Tun
to of cnn) Icor ins •cGun. -- - — y Fooling drain(nu. lin. ft.)
anufaclurehome ut hies
iiitu$Ip s
s none: C o!u m b.r"t_.�{er�}�.7 3 .ti - an+o es
Rain driln connector
l _ r'91 Stale:n r GIP: - Sanitary sewer(no. lin. T)_ —
nea -220y 1 N•ax: I E-mail: S(onn sewer no, lin ft ) --
8 Plunlb bats.reit,no: 2,1- - S W ai
CITv TIGARD 24-Hour
JILDING Inspection Line: (503) 639-4175
INSPECTION DIVISION Business Line: (503) 639-4171 MST '
U.
BILIP
Received Date Requested AM_ PM __ BUP
Location _ l '- '�-�� _ -—Suite EC =dam .Z3 6
Contact Person
Contractor
Ph(—) SWR
BUILDING TenanVOwner ELC
Footing ---------
Foundation Access: ELC -
Ftg Drain -— �l /� m i\
CJ (.J ELR
Crawl Drain �J ,
Slab Inspection Notes: T
Post&Beam �-C.� K, �� L
Shear Anchors
Ext Sheath/Shear
Int Sheath/Shear 117 > D �
Framing
Insulation
Drywall Nailing
Firewall
Fire Sprinkler -- ---- _ —
Fire Alarm V G
Susp'd Ceiling
Roof
Other:
Final
PASS PART_ FAIL -
PLUMBING _
Post&Beam ----�
Under Slab
�M
Rough-In �^ -
Water Service
Sanitary Sewer
Rain Drains
Catch Basin/Manhole L-7 ,1 �t/�, `�< e (1
Storm Drain ,.�4-AJC 7
Shower Pen
SPART FAIL L �_- -- --
ANICAL
Post BBeam
Rough-In
Gas Line
Smoke Dampers
f—"AS FAIL
S r `:�L•_-� _ cls..._../_�.!"-�--�1
E-TYWTRICAL
Service ---
Rough-in
UG/Slab -
Low Voltage
Fire Alarm
Final Reinspection fee of$ required before next inspection. Pay at City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd
PASS PART FAIL
SITE _ L I Please call for reinspection RE:_ __- �� Unable to inspect-no access
Fire Supply Line
ADA
Approach/Sidewalk pate Inspector
Other:
Final DO NOT REMOVE this Inspection record from the job site.
PASS PART FAIL