The URL can be used to link to this page

14800 SW 109TH AVENUE UEN f 14800 SW 109TH AVENUE 1 I� L .�J Ch 0 -1 c� Li �7� w Kjwxmw-l"=w1millimlA UK January 31, 1980 THIS IS TO CERTIF'i THAI' JIM FEILD IS TAKING OUT THE PLANS FOR CANTERBURY WOODS COND)MINIUMS. THE PLANS WILL BE RETURNED TO THE CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING DEPARTMENT BY FEBRUARY 6TH, 1980. NSR. FEILD IS EMPLOYED BY PROGRESSIVE BUILDERS NORTHWEST. HE IS ALSO SUBMITTING A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $100. IN WHICH WILL BE R=RNED TO HIM ON THE RETURN OF THE CANTERBURY WOODS PLANS. J ` /Signed p_ EMU P O BOX 127 • TUALATIN, ORLGON 97062 • PHONE 682.2601 • RUSSELL WASHBURN CHEF October 29, 1979 REPORT RE: FINAL INSPECTION, CANTERBURY WOODS CONDOMINIUMS S.W. Canterb, ,y Loop Building 6 At 8:30 A.M. a representative of City of Tigard, Buildings Departm�nt, the job foreman of Canterbury Woods Condominiums , and myself made a final inspection of L'uilding 6. The following notations ave made regarding this inspection: 1 . In condominiums with loft areas , pocket doors going from the living room into the kitchen have either been covered by sHQetrock , covered by wood -frame, or have been removed. 2. In the loft areas attic acc�iss tas be(.n provided, but it is only 18" x 26". The representative of Canterbury Woods said that the height was being increased to 36". It would not be possible to increase the width to 22" because the ! i telephone prewire connections are in the way. 3. In basement areas with doors between each basement storage area, doorways have been provided. Some doorways do not have doors installed, others have 1 3/4" solid wood core doors with a wood frame. Neither the wood door nor the frame are labeled. None of the alarm locks are installed. The basement areas have been sheetrocked. The foreman was told to have the sheetrockers increase the number of nails in the sheeting and most areas have not yet been taped. i i 1 oqs I I was asked by the City of Tigard to siqn off the occupancy permit. On the basis of the fact that not all the items are completed in the building, it would be my opinion that the occupancy permit should not be signed until such time as all these items are completed. A letter addressed to Peter Hoffman, August 17, 1979, from the State Fire Marshal states in part that (the door and frame will be ?0-minute rated with self-closing latch , but not lockable. These doors will be marked for "Emergency Use Only" and be equipped with a security alarm system. In addition, the entrance doors to each of the storace areas will be lockable from the outside only to allow egress from within in case of fire). This would be in reference to notation #3, It should be additionally noted that in Building 6 there is presently one condominium occupied by one lady; whose furniture, clothing, bedding, kitchen accessories , etc. were all moved in. It was obvious that the unit was being used as a residence. JneG eolith Deputy ire Marshal JAGmt rc: qty of Tigard, Building Department Peter Hoffman, Hoffman & Hoffman. Inc. State Fire Marshal KM►�. /s� 3 v � 1 ' i i P.O. Box 23397 12420 S.W. Main Tigard,Oregon 97223 September 4, 1979 Mr. Peter Hoffman Hoffman and Hoffman, Inc. 1888 S.W. Madison Portland, Oregon 97205 Subject: Occupancy Permits - Canterbury Woo0e. Dear. Mr. Hoffman: This is in response to your letter of August 31, 1979 requesting occupancy permits for the units in buildings No. 8 and No. 9 of the Canterbu Woods Condominiums. As I have stated before, as City Administrator 1 will not allow the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy nor allow the occupancy of any unit in any of the buildings in the Canterbury Woods Planned Development until such rime as the buildings and related development of the property conform to and comply with all the applicable City ordinances and requirements, or until such time as a court order is issued forcing me to issue Certificates of Occupancy. All of the units in buildings No. 8 and No. 9 have been inspected by the City Iiuildi.ng Official and, as you know, have passed final inspection, except for the fireplace vents and the attic access panels (these deficiencies may have been corrected since the last inspection) . There are, however., items other than the buildings themselves that must be completed and approved before occupancy permits will. be issued. They are as follows: 1. Planting of two (2) more 20-foot fir trees in the large "gap" near the eastern property line. While you have planted eleven large, beautiful fir trees along t'ie east aide of your development, you have not met, in my opi.niot, and in the opinion of the City Council members and the Planning Commissioners, the! intent of the Planning Con,misnion to achieve "tnlXiiw.!m screening,." 2. Installation of a 5-foot high fence alot.g the entire length of the eastern property line, erected in such a manner as to pry-serve the large trees. i I i i Mr. . Pater Hoffman September 4, 19',19 Page 2 3. Installation of chimney chases on all. !-)uil.din8S- It is my under-standing that they have already been in5tallvd on buildings No. 8 and No. 9. 4. Emergency access completed and approved by muz,lat.in Rural. Fire Protection District. It is my understanding that your revised plans have been approved by %hc Fire District . You have, of course, the priviledge of appenli.ne, my decisions Lo the City Council. However, inasmuch as you are so close to obtaining occupancy permits, I strongly suggest you quickly co-npletc, the items liSc-c above and, upon their I completion, l will. instruct the iiuilding Official to i-MUCI you occupancy permits immediately. Sincerc,ly, Raeldon R. 3arker City Administrator RRB:l.m. cc: Planning Director, City of Tigard V-iluildine, Official , City of Tigard TualaLin Rural Fire Protection District 1♦ � �h I Department of Commerce OFFICE OF ,-TATE FIRE MARSHAL VICTOR ATIYEM 103 LABOR & INDUSTRIES BUILDING, SALEM, OREGON 97310 PHONE (503) 378-4917 90vC11M011 plECEIVED August 24, 1979 nu G CIIY OF ,f(,A"' Mr Jeter B. Hoffman HoAfUd'ol ffman, Inc. 18aonPo , Oa 97205 Dear Mr. Hoffman: In answer to your letter of August 21, 1979 regarding Cmterbury Woods Condominiums, Tigard Oregon, the proposed smke detector, model #1.85 Nu- Tone photo electric unit meets the requirements of the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code. and Fire and Life Safety Code. Your proposal in paragraph two, to substitute two layers of 5/8" Type X Gypsum Board on the interior sides of the exterior basement walls with solid block at the joist space meets with our approval. It should be noted that Pat Franzen also discussed this substitution with Tualatin Fire District-, Acting Fire Marshal Jack Palmer, and Tigard Build- Ing Official Ed Walden via telephone, and received their approval. Very truly yours �'.. Ct, 7V' euv� ' CLI. E W. CENTERS State Fire Marshal cc: Wilbert Russell, Dist. Deputy Ed Walden, Bldg. Official v' Jack Palmer, Fire Marshal CWC:rs HOFFMAN & HOFF! PIAN, INC. 1888 SOUTHWEST MADISON PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 (503) 228-2.800 August 21, 1979 Clyde Centers, Fire Marshal. Division Dept. of Commerce 103 Labor & Industri.es Building .Salem, Oregon .97310 Jim Kenworthy Jack Palmer ' Russell Wa 3hburn }� ~-e',,y;•Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District P..., O. Box. 127 Ref: Canterbury Woods Tualatin, Oregon 97062 Condominiums Tigprd, Oregon , ` Dear Sirs: rl have ,located an approved single station detector and would dike to have your concurrence on this item to be installed at t,• �the Canterbury Woods Condominiums. The smoke detector is a " UL approved battery powered ICBO listed, Model #185 Nu-Tone photo electric unit. This unit shall be located in the ceilings of the loft space in a location which Jim 1 enworthy and Peter Hoffman have selected. With reference to the letter from the State Fire Marshal' s ;`.division dated August 7, 1979, Item B, #2: "All exterior walls and 'separat4jn walls, with the exception of the two-hour fire ' walls, stall be of one-hour res; stive construction. " I would ` like to submit an alternative to this which will give us greater : ' fire protection. The fire resistant construction on all exterior basement walls would be two layers of 5/8" Type X on the interior of the walls;, and solid block at the joist space. This would • gi.ve a two-hour fire resistant construction on the interior which I 'eel would be in Excess of the one-hour fire resistant cons- truction which the state fire marshal has prescribed. ''I introduce these items for your approval and would appreciate a rep- -r a,nd approval in writing submitted to this office. Y We will request Occupancy Permits, providing the scheduled events : - are completed, as early as Friday August 24, 1979. Your immediate ,' , attention regarding these matters is greatly appreciated. f. you have any questions you can contact me directly at 228-2800 I ";Tin"Portland, and we will gladly answer any of them. 1. S rely► t�t Hof .m . ...PBN,'hl_. e,mi . , , pRtBIN'14��, 77 = Department of Commerce Fire Marshal Division V. Atie'r. 103 LABOR & INDUSTRIES BUILDING, SALEM, OFIEGON 97310 PHONE (503) 378-4917 August 7, 1979 News Release from the Office of State Fire Marshal CANTERBURY WOODS CONDOMINIUMS FIRE & LIFE SAFETY CODE PROBLEMS RESOLVED . The intent of the Fire & Life SafEty Code will be met when the buildings are ready for occupancy, says State Fire Marshal Clyde Centers. Agreements between thA State Fire N.arshal, City of Tigard, Tualatin R.F.P.D. . and Hoffman & Hoffman, Inc. of the Canterbury Woods Condo- miniums -,-,ill lead to an orderly completion of a code complying res- idential occupancy. (See Attached Letter for Details) i IIIIIKLWJUNFLNFW W 99 a� Department of Commerce Fire Marshal Division 103 LADOR & INDUSTRIES BUILDING, SALEM, OREGON 97310 PHONE (503) 378-1317 August 7, 1979 Mr. Peter Hoffman Hr ffman & Hoffman, Inc. 1888 S.W. Madison St. Portland, OR 97205 Dear Mr. Hoff man: Re: Canterbury Woods Condominiums , Tigard, OR It is the opinion of the State Fire Marshal that the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code and Fire & Life Safety Code does not specifically address the question as to whether the loft areas as conE trusted in the Canterbury Woods Condominiums are a third story or a mezzanine as addressed in Sections 414 and 3?02(a). A. Since the loft areas are in various degrees of completion, and it would be an unfair hardship on the owner to await r, code change to clarify this subject, the State Fire Marshal has elected to utilize Scc+ion 106 of the State of Oregon Structural SpE-cialty Code and Fire & Life Safety Cade to address the subject and assure the occupants that the intent of the fire and life safety sections of the code have been met. The loft areas were computed and found to be in the 33 1/3% range based on the common atmosphere of the living-dining room- kitchen, and adjacent halls which are all open to the loft. This open area will provide the occupant(s) of the loft area the opportunity for seeing, smelling, or hearing any potential hazard such as fire, which rr. y occur within the areas of the common atmosphere. To further protect the occupants of the entire condominium, the following methods of c�lnGcruetion shall be required: 1 . One-hour fire resistive tenant separation (walls and floor ceiling assemblies) . 2 . Approved single station detectors shall be lo.:ated in the ceiling of the loft space in a location to be approved by the local fire marshal. i . The pocket doors between the kitchen, living-dining area shall be permanently blocked open. Mr. Peter Iloffman August 7, 1979 Page 4. The existing two-.hour fire walls will be completed in such a manner as to continue down through the basement with penetrations protected as approved by the State Fire Marshal. B. Basement areas as outlined in the plans dated October 2, 1978 and amended on July 19, 1979 are acceptable with the following provisions: 1. Each storage area shall have an exit door. In addition, a door shall be located at the rear c,f each storage unit with a minimum width of 36" . This door and frame will be 20-minute rated with self-closing latch, but not lockable. These doors wil' be marked for "Emergency Use Only' and be equipped with a security alarm system. In addition, the entrance doors j to each of the storage areas will be lockable from the outside only to allow egress from within in case of a f�lrc. Permanently designated aisles, 36" wide, shall be provided on each side of the separation wall as to assure a secondary exit. 2. All ex*jrior walls and separation walls, with the exception of the two-hour fire walls, shall be of one-hour fire resistive construction. 3. Mr. Peter Hoffman shall provide the State Fire Marshal with a copy of the By-Laws which will address the use of the bar,ement storage: areas, maintenance of the fire exit, security alarm and the fire exit aisle. It should be noted that the items dealing with the loft area apply to all buildings containing lofts , and the requirements for the basement areas pertain to buildings #6 and #7. It should be further noted that these alternate methods of construction and materials were discussed with Tigard Building Official Ed Walden, Acting Fire Marshal Jack Palmer, Tualatin RFPD, and Fire Inspector Jim Kenworthy, Tualatin RFPD, and they shall provide the State Fire Marshal with a letter of con,,urrence. Sincerely, (?Q cir�Q.�Y' C�,�,�`�►-ate Clyde W. Centers State Fire Marshal CWC:ic cc: Jane Huston Jim Kenworthy Trevor Jacobson Ed Walden Plans Review Walt Friday Jack Palmer Wilbert Russell Russell Washburn rim � i 1HRM P.O. BOX 127 • TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 • PHONE 682-2601 • RUSSELL WASHBURN, CHIEF August 6, 1979 Mr. Ed Walden Building Official City of Tigard Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Ed: Ed, I aw writing this letter at your request to confirm the statement I made to Mr. Barker on July 27, 1979 at the site of the Canterbury Woods project. My statement was: There is absolutely no quest-on but that the structures known as Canterbury Woods are in compliance with the Uniform Building Code re- garding the maximum allowable height in feet. I hope this letter will be of use to you. If I can be of further assistance, feel free to call . Yours truly, r Jim Kenworthy Building (Official .�.�yau�llo CITY Y OF 1 IGARD P.Q. Box 23397 112420 S.W. Main Tigard,Oregon 97223 July 30, 1979 Mrs. lma Scott 14873 SW 106th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mrs. Scott: This letter will confirm my recent statement to you regarding the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for units in the Canterbury Woods Planned Development. Before the City of Tigard issues any Certificates of. Occupancy for any unit in the Canterbury Woods Planned Development we will request a final inspection of the units by the State Fire Marshall or his representative and the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District.. We will require that both agencies, as well as the City itself, ",sign-off" on the units before any Certificates of Occupancy are issued. Sincerely, ��&%,AL�, R, R. Barker. City Administrator RRB:lw CC: Clyde Centers, State Fire Marshall Russell Washburn, Chief, TRFPD �� F,d"dalden, Building Official Mayor and Council CITY OF � .� .. IC,ARD P.O. B o x 23397 12420 S.W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 July 30, 1979 Mr. Fred A. Anderson Attorney at Law Tigard Professional Center 88G5 S.W. Center Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Letter of July 24, 1979, Canterbury Woods Dear Sir: Th,! major issues to be resolved prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits to Mr. Hoffman for Canterbury Wood, :ire as follows: 1. Landscaping: Please reference my letter to Mr. Hoffman dated July 12, 1979 and my letter to Mr. Hoffman dated July 16, 1979. In these letters I specificElly request that certain details be attended to. 2. Chimney chases: Please refer to a note that I received from Mr. Van Lom dated July 23, 1979. 3. Parking areas and structures: Please refer to my letter to Mr. Hoffman dated June 18, 1979. In this letter I state that final approval will be dependant upon the fire district's approval. Please refer to a letter to me from the Tualatin Rural Fire Pro- tection District, Mr. Joseph Greulich, dated July 25, 1979. Substantial changes will be necessary before they will approve the present installation. Please refer to a letter from Mr. Barker, City Administrator, to Mrs. Ima Scott dated July 30, 1979. At this time we have not received clarifica':ion of the status of additional space under the roof centerline nor have we received clarification of i^sues in the basement areas. Following the Public Hearing before the Planning Commission on August 7, 1979 I will have some definato2 directives to carry out. Obviously the "final inspections" may discover additional i' ems which will need to be corrected prior • n Occupancy Permits being issued. A "final inspection" has not been reques ed to date. Mr Fred A. Anderson July 30, 1979 CanterLury Woods Page 2 Please review the enclosures. If you need clarification of any material I will attempt to provide same. Yours tri_iLy, Aldie Howard Planning Director Ali:1 m cc: R.R. Barher &,,Ed Walden Canterbury Woods file C AMf-ERbVR y , 02 :2 s- I ERIN MHMUfl � P O. BOX 127 • TUALATIN, ORFGON 97062 • PHONE 687.7601 • RUSSEI, L WASHBURN. CHIEF July 24 , 1979 Mr. Peter B. Hoffman 1888 S.W. Madison Portland, Oregon 97214 Dear Mr. Hoffman: We have not received an As Built Plot Plan of your Canterbury Woods project. We have asked for this verbally several times. We won't be able to give you any approval until we have reviewed your As Built Plot Plan (note Tigard Ordinance #14.16.100). You are currently in violation of Tigard Ordinance #14.16.080 arid our Fire Prevention Code #3-1 .1 .10, both regarding access for fire apparatus. Your As Built Access does not currently meet with our approval . Please help us resolve this issue as soon as possible. If we can be of any assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us. Yours in Fire Safety ,lacB. Palmer Act g Fire Marshal JBP:dm l/c�c : City of Tigard I f CITY OF TIGARD BLDG. DEPT. 12420 S.W. MAIN STREET TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE 639.4171 CONTRACTOR: ! Pursuant to Section(s) of the Uniform Building Code, the following item(s) require correcting: ? � 1 I s. l -- --- f/ ate: Permit No. Inspector f CALL FOR REINSPECTION W 't ®r! t W THE VAN LOM rY; KRAXBERGFR PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS PLANNFRS A.I.A. July 23 , 1979 Raleigh HMIs Professional Bldg. 4455 S W. Scholls Ferry Roan Portland, Oregon 97225 (503) 292-8895 Mr . Aldie Howard City of Tiqard 12420 S. W. Main Tigard, Oregon 9722.3 Rc�: Canterbury Woods Condominiums Chimney chases Dear Aldie: Peter Hoffman has asked me to reivew the chimney chases at the Canter!Dury Snoods Condominiums. As you may know all metal pro- jections above the roof have been painted but are left exposed. Our drawings show one-hal.f of the chase encloqed and one-half exposed. I have looked over the finished product and feel that the exposed chimneys are not unsightly and. in fact are less not?.cable than if they were exposed as we had them originally shown. The fact that the site is very wooded is of course the major factor for the chases are lost within the trees. The chimney chases would tend to accentuate roof penetrations rather than play them down. I am t.heref.ore asking that this be reviewed by either the design review board at their next meeting or the Tigard Planning ConLmission on the August. 9th meeting. If you have any questions please give me a call . Yours very truly, 6THEAN LOMjKRAXBER ER PARTNERSHIP A.I .A. tiM. Van Lom, A. I.A. ct JVL l.vl o4 If ZtAl ivi 7_c �, � A &Fore- Nor-, CEO= July 12, 1979 R . Peter Hoffr an 1888 S.w. Madison c Portland, O.:eronn 97:.z _ . Ra: Landscaping at C uit-erbury 1,Tood3 Dear tdr.. i-o f f mar►: The "approved" landscaping plans for. Canterbury !{sods, datacl Jartuazy 26, .1978, do not con£ors! to w2:at is pxes?ntly being installed. Mr. VO4LLom was asked to submit "duplicate of the original," copie3 of tha landacaps plan to this d=parts-rent a?pzoxi:rately one rion:h ago. ate t�laa3 that I received wexa dated March 3, 1978. The plans that your superintendent has at the sit, ate dat d January 9, 1979, and are identical to the "naw plans" sub:nl.ttc!d to r.:e by 1,1r. Van Lom. I contacted mr. Van Lora and was told that the datos ropreszntad "revisions to the original plan". T,That is being insLalled on the site con- £o�, as far as I can ascertain, to plans dated Jan 7, 1979 and hold by r1•. Bznthar.d, the l�:ndscaoin�, contractor, Hmlevar, th3sa pla. a ha%- not been a!�provscl by tris dopartmant. In chscking with Mx. Barnhart I finl that only one third of t`!a 1_aild,;c�;vinq has bran accomplished to dTrt ate. is is a fo.�il ord3r to you to stop all w•ar'r, oz tile landscaping until you have an approval by m3 of your "Pi�sant plan". ibis: spproval will not ba givan until aftor the Planning Cam z3.l,vn znvie;va th13 entire project at a public hearing abbecluled fo.r August 7, 1979. This is your formal notification of this public hearing. 111 feeling is th•.t you have not conforced to the original landscaping 13an 9 and that you havnot rraeivsd "approval" of the ;law" plan. ;,a wa ars headllad for a pWolic haaring on this and ot%ar is.suas I feel that ora Ehoula "hold the lzndsaaping for aPProval". Hopefully this hearing will r0:,0IV3 all of th3 issues and you eril]. be able to complete the Mrlainc.Yr of tl-o two.r'c 0:1 the project and not suffer further soi-backa. I .will not oppos3 the nosr lancl:3 aping Plan and trill rico"-""d no3roval to the n1:.innin9 Co_,al.ssion at the public hearing. It seems far mu,-n �t.�Flropziatx, t:•!nn the original plan, and the complste-d portion loo' cs varY good. You ctu3t rclaliza t:tat I person tl.ly have vory few concarn3 about your project. I hrave rr � ir. Pat---r Hoffman July 12, 1979 Paga 2. baea the middle of li`Ligaticn by lass er. Plu:,-maled bar naigh_ :3ozhoo3 grou03, suffered a fere arz,.•�z from your bow, and been h.isoaa ar 'y t-i�w- fi.rn Marshal. Through it all 1 still tliin'c tzat Cantj3rburvl4ioo•i3 i5 one of the b;�st Projects in Ti yard. Tha ent_ra City or3anlzat?on has warned moxa froom this involy-r.:ent with you thea fro any other project to dat!- We have chanG•ad our coda of oparaticns to SFS2 tilclt lli 3 pXotj]g do not arisa to such a u gree again. T'ais may b4 littla co,z,:ort to you at this Mage, but ,rs all le,rn throu h e;!paz-a nca. Yours truly, illldd ire Uowa_--;' Planning Dix-actor *U1:1rn , i .TtaiA 13, 133 w 1373 S.t�. :�acii3nn 7or.4_Lw-A.., Ox3 jon 97214 T%i ax Ns. fio% m-an. " Mr. Wa- Irlan, md. Z liays discussed your reit .5ts ou`1,.t:jyd i:, yntlt 6, 1979 luttar. You axe wvaxrsl of tho difficultLes n x ratm3;.ng t:itn par i.c,alar ,proj.act, and you mast tea?.{ze t',lat: 1 have aa+rtsin r.inPenAbil3tiae �ytiich ;naacats aa,:iu`.ntial p,iorfortnanne on your pari:. So-me of t'hasa saquen;as hav9 Leen ra- " ::3rsed and it is difficult far " to rrtroa':.i.tr)1y approv" your dtt:ioja. t1t3:43n5 n I:ia;.4 SYPaG'39, Davin'? the a1-::3. inatall.inn ,a!v! {••;wzm x..._ qu3at'_n3 a?fro a,>I. is a "rcivar:jed. cagtmam". The Fire Ma artvio"i, 4.;? �- iaietoly satl!3fled wltb this ad Uticnal par!-.ing becau3a it is ,rux— r�etrl•,'i;•s for Utalr v hi.cizo, 3:11 if one car is par.cad "illo',Aly" It: is than 1s•,1c,ja1bl3 .':ox t,.1a :1.:,:a v'3hiol.a3 to naAgat3 thrauD:z t%3 daysl,32 ,ent. So ghat do I do? , D--, ltaln tbat: 'yoga t-ar it Out,, 2.de sign it:, ra3u-b- tt: youz clagign to t::'ln f'ir3 Dape,rtment, and than ro-lnatall -- you are alp mr ... you roa3.l.zra ;hat in the final analy:ais I hav3 no choice butto txy th3 "smut's ea.:..- and silt ptxaa xou- W-Ile'!---ali�n?aat.3 a frto s;aaca3 by "painting tham out% pj;);, i;attcally 1t x:11 Y.-Imain a "zea ,%Ing arca" rxaaau3e im have no Jurisdiction over a pr'!vats road h•3nce no police pacer in the a-ma. Your chan,� in the pax?ting aria is not satin actory 4111 I W-11 not .-1paizrnn3 any of the aaaagaa� tmt1.1 th�7 Dire za,?ast, =nt in satiayiaJ., end has not!find i.:a in writing that tta3y ara satin?ije�i, You are to submit. .a raviLQd plan o:' gals paxking aro;i fo:•: ,holr ravlaw 1,,irh naavific rsimursmnts shown vr'hich wl.0 43.1oyj caay mov'er.M3nt-3 of ea-Vr nay 1 ; vol3ia]a.�. I woul.l appxnciate a copy of t4:l.s b�l�.�s. nirmissiun to c'als%e the tr-gil sysL•.aa, and picnic and ;t 130clated JAghi-.ing is hsr:!by gra-,j-tsd ;3y t-jr. A nchiMy 2-21123 W U be Cov:arvd. Vain`..Lnq is not: aa7roA rl,a`a. S.a h.zv:4 ' &`*cuaned t.hlc iumm for ra loaq t:i.w i1nd you h-t-M prQviol,31y agraacl to cutrar `.ya chinmy'e, Please nae that thin in done. :w a r i •1 i Mr. r-Et•3I B. u0i�iT3f1 lade S.w. .•a3iga, Portland, O-'-agcn 9721.4 ,';,:+sae 13, 1973 Pay® 2 hsz" been notified that you intsnd to install stE!ir� to ttia "g�v,a;a aroa" in tha basasa'rntj of savural units--"after oceupaacy Oainjta hive been issr-ed". I Prould sugyast t1lat you not do this, but I ha q a t)rribla feel- ing that Pe.rzaas I am sc"nazdng uadly a:: the =,cn. :ours truly, Ald e Iiew+a_d. PlazIning D.L.-actor �Li;lm State says Canterbury lofts CHIC, access under study Clyde Centers, state fire marshal, City Council.According to Centers,the said this week an inspection of the lofts do not represent a third story to Canterbury Woods c:nndominium de• the building and cannot be considered velopment on little Hull Mountain last in violation of codes regarding three- week brought two problems to light, ry buildings. .` one of access to the basements and the ut access to the ofts was less tha other in access to lofts of the buildings. his department prove, Centers "We just talked about the I blems sai(!, wiLh only irway to each. with the building,.;caner and architect," "T 's ' l,��n icce5t , !e method" of Centers said Tuesday. He said the de- a c h old the Times, adding that veloper, Peter Hoffman, was coopera fir c les require two accesses or eom- tive with his department and that th of fire. developer is Studying the problems aild pen. tion basement eac ess ss insproblem is will report hack to the fire marshal more difficult to define, according to soon. TCenters. Until he knows the Iloorplan he lofts to some of the buildings of the basements, the fire marshal ex. have been an issue at Tigard during plained, he cannot determine if access discussions of the project in Tigard to the bar.,ments is adequate. -• q ��I. � y(Y � � +aud;� Jt�r�u,'ra�¢ u• M( � ?" '?t �i.5.0 rtr"'n j; '•r ,IL.� ,. 'N _�•yyk f t K�.y�l( f 1 '', 4 h pal 7 1�1:, Y 1 ,�f `rl\t ti• ,,Y r 7 I I.{ 'I, rTf•1' X �' 4 � .. e1t 1. 1 1 ,•','�.•. ,.,a�t ..y��7f ,, i,,.g-.t �� ii/ f +,�( nrl �+j�„fav`•1� �,. ,t v a .. . IN 40 :.AV .'I. .f,. •. T1 ,q!ti. .d 1,It, .t'.,C �� ''�,r�SrS i7' u�s.S.ia y,,�2d'a <.I rY'i+'alj i� ih!� b [, . n + n t Vali. arp I�}j d� zr MOF=FMAN FOFFMAN IhJ(�? " , r"t;zt; ,; J , ti �, , ;air V � f 3.` r Yn,S{I r,r�6� 1�', i , kr �'a �i! Cyt {i7�,jti.�:"�,+1,r , 1�iw ��,�tt7Cf? 1.,,'. s t a:.'t'�!�: ..I W .?•«` � dip yY'f'. ' 1888 SOUTHWES1_MADISON r Y'. PORTLAND,,0REG0N 97206(50,3)228 28 • dap �1 } tl` � �,,r,r i *a ik�� r a r r r A � `fr"r�� ', �� -,. ,5 1i I • r+� iM �; -t'�r+� Sludgy, �'� 4 �tn1.�` fi� w t tlly�r��tC r �-0r�r�'V �!��+. �+ 'J"�Ii�.,�, �. :,• s`5��~ „�j�• y,r♦Y'.•r' If .! {.`• �ITt Gyp. f � t _ r t';tri y�•' ��'li „ S.1,�• ,�„ Z •�; r , [ t A 137.d.arul.,11'v i 1�,pC.i .n 0. 339 l •'' egpl2C ` ?h hTIt:E`TI11Y7,y�H/Clrl i �'ri;,,iii'ill i .t -;T (}I : ! l7. .�LDIl� �:1 5 }I i :� III1 1 It Lill y C f?�art`.ment:; Cif: tiw+� 9 d ,project.,, rJTi �.r ti r+Tl t Il(� xef:c�l:cnr:c tew� r:' , '17 F`(il�f•,t:''I ) t ; t:he, 1.,'.�a i sy�t(?Itt 11n(1. pi.c nic area 31 ono ,w� ,ti d tll4i GAl{}y I �'.I i{ r ri..'I }'i i..i•ng lie deleted.,front ithe' deea op—yo7 1 ykl.. It. MIL:I +�y",��,(�,yy�� '�.� y ,�f}5 ' .9';T� j I.'� .,, .r , ♦al?"} rr1M4�r4♦ 'I^! S.t f! '� i •,'4'1•7. nt7f• �+it,. ` ,;� .�'.1'1•zis';�:� %at i tlE*�L:egtlp4i4�>uf', tFle.^1Su�.t.cling, 3epaxtment � G- Sure adec�<iate�drain�tgc� r,f.',,the sr.te 1 r '•r!•.� �� +�' s kl "q � �'Ir y{y�y', ,q ti ,.14 t'1!i:��11 6 y,`l. ,•i �,'�f.. � `� t . a ( -,�t �r. J1 i (�fi,�I,. �:,.+�{r7, ��[•?M AS .�, •' 1 �'r T.�ai.eciue ant.It.�st we I,c� Feed tr�4, zztr,zeasttt :•, � 'ui �ezed:;�, ick i;icr-fspac es to BCl:�by c h�inc;i.nq;;:;thetrf sl and ' i ••�ekt�ca:z,r�a�•gc�l�ro r� c3at` the'• arld�i.t 18bR.1. ;pacer. 111fiLs wi l I.'eliminate�`�n , r tr +vt t(f' CU1lC�GBtJolYr+WI1J''I +.Ina.y plf�vf'. be L lri'c°;iu sP.d 'hy',;I'l$Vl n Iet3 ,• ihiLiu-1twu �)li�c: 4 j) r 7tfnit r , � k rY ' r 'ta -iY�tir` '• °yyy��,r':•�• ti(,�• �. '1 - l'� Vt��r�6� � ' 4•:' 1[r� V• � 1 ' i "Y . . ,+ �Fe.". 'f�i'h�N11•�•!M,.,, ,` a ��ly tfW.�'�'(�'.Yy lsrf L,,t t i,..'��Y�i n A � .� •- •, i, , {'1'Ij o1 ly-, we request..,U—J..a t the','chimney f luc :� be pal, ed. 'sic:. cllrz-e..nLly have painted several, an ral.•th-tone; brown , an(C believe this willmeet your.l,'app.rraval. aesthe{_i.cally,, ' We would' l i k - for you to visit 'the site to see;'''tho e' prior to ycn.,r, �fieci i ul l. tf' any further- infnciriatit)o is nr,edrd }IIttcoie d mo E `' tatelto call. ' fours tl.ul y f f r; �• �E i e it f 11 { ;Oo PBH,/j I? 4 .1 W W W t Green Valley Development 9095 S.W. Burnham Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re : CU 9-79 Gentlemen: Please be advised that the Tigard Planning Commission at their regular meeting of May 1, 1979, approved your request for a conditional use permit to operate the following furniture , tool, hardware, paper pro- duct, and heating equipment manufacturing. Machine, welding shop, con- tractor's office, warehousing and wholesale distribution. Weaving of cotton, wool, flax, and other fibrous products at the above referenced project. This approval is subject to the following conditions : 1. That the applicant dedicate ten (10) feet of right-of-way along S.W. Tigard Street. 2. That the Buildi.nS Inspector and Fire Marshall inspect and approve the building prior to occupancy of tenants. 3. That insolation be installed, if needed, to limit the noise potential. Installation to be approved by the Building Department. 4. That the Fire Marshall approve the use of each space prior to the issuance of a business license by the City of Tigard„ 5. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate depart- ment and changes are approved by that department. Application _ for changes will be made in writing and shall include applic- able drawings , engineering specifications and other details requested by the department. No construction shall take place in these instances until after the changes have been approved. Any deviation from this condition will result in the immediate posting of a stop work order on the: project_ or any portion of the project. i i i i i i W i WE FM rM Green Valley Development May 8, 1979 CU 9-79 Page 2 The conditional use permit shall expire in one year from the date of approval, if the use has not begun and continual progress toward its full operation is not in evidence. If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to con- tact this office at 639-4171. Sincerely, Ken Selby Associate City Planner KS:lin Note: The following acknowledgement must be .received by the City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this letter. Failure to return this acknowledgement may result in action by the City of Tigard. I hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of. the Tigard Plann- ing Commission. I have .received and read this letter, and I agree to the decision here_ documented and to abide by any terms and/or conditions attach- ed. Signature (applicant) Date Signature (James R. Schlauch/ Bullier & Bullier) SWIM May 8, 1979 Mr. and Mrs. George P. Husvar 14200 S.W. 97th Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: ZC 3-79 Gear Mr. and Mrs. Husvar. : The Tigard Planning Commi:::;ion on Mav 1, 1979, has voted to recom- mend to the City Council that the abovr- referenced project be approved subject to conditions listed below: 1. That USA sewer service be available for any parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. That five f--et cf right-of-way be dedicated to the City from lots 106 and 107 along the frontage of S.W. 97th with half street improvements prior to .issuance of building 1-.omits. 3. That all streets created on any parcel when development occurs shall be designed to connect to existing streets and will be prohibited from creating cul-de-sac or dead end streets unless the need can be justified. 4. No changes will. be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal application 9s made to the appropriate depart- ment and changes are approved by that department. Applica- tion for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings , engineerinc specifications and other details requested by the department. No construction shall take place in these instances until after the changes have been approved. Any deviation from this condition will re- sult in the iimnediate posting of a stop work order on the project or any portion of the project. 'Phis recommendation has been written in ordinance form and will be con- sidered by the City Council at its May 21, 1979, meeting, Fowler Junior High School, Lecture Room, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, 8:00 P.M. At that Mr. and Mrs. George P. ffusvar May 8, 1979 ZC 3-79 Page 2 time, the City Council has the following cptions: approve, modify, deny, remand back; to the Planning Commission or determine to hold a hearing on the record established at the Planning Commission. No additional te.stin!ony will be taken by the Council at its meeting. You will be provided written notice of. the Council's action. Sincerely, Ken Selby Associate City Planner KS:lm Note: The following acknowledgement must be received by the City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this letter. Failure to re- turn this a6mowledgement may result in action by the City of Tigard. I hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard Plann- ing Commission. I have received and read this letter, and I agree to the decision here documented and to abiae by any terms and/or conditions attach- ed. I I r May 8, 1979 Mr. Jack Annand 14600 S.W. Pacific Hwy Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: uC 9-79 Dear Mr. Annand: The Tigard Planning Commission on May 1, 1979, has voted to recommend to the City Council that the above referenced project be approved subject to conditions listed below . 1. That half street improvements along the subject property fronting Southwest of 109th Avenue be made prior to issu-• ance of building permits. 2. That the developer submit construction and site drainage plans to be approved by the City Engineer and Building Departments with necessary bonds prior to issuance of build- ing permits. 3. That the significant vegetation be perserved. 4. That the Staff is directed to work with the applicant to find a mutually agreeable location for the road across the property to serve the area not yet developed. 5. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate depart- ment and changes are approved by that department. Applica- tion for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings, engineering specif?cations and other details requested by the department. No construction shall take place in these instances until after the changes have been approved. Any deviation from this condition will result in the immediate posting of a stop work order on the project or any portion of the project. This recommendation has been written in ordinance form and will be con- sidered by the City Council at its May 21, 1979, meeting, Fowler Junior High, School, Lecture Room, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, 8:00 P.M. At that Mr. Jack Ann•and May 8, 1979 ZC 9-79 Page 2 time, the City Council has the following options: approve, modify, deny, remand back to the Planning Commission or determine to hold a hearing on the record established at the Plaruiing Commission. No additio:ial testimony will be taken by the Council at its meeting. You will be provided written notice of the Council's action. Sincerely, Ken Selby Associate City Planner KS:lm Note: The following acknowledgement must be received by the City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this letter. Failure to return this acknowledgement may result in action by the City of Tigard. I hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard Planning Commission. I have received and read this letter, and I agL,�e to the decision here documented and to abide by any terms and/or condi- tions attached. Signature Date I I May 8, 1979 Mr. Peter Hoffman 1888 S.W. Madison Portland, Oregon 97214 Re: 7C 10-79 Dear Mr. Hoffman: The Tigard Planning Commission on May 1 , 1979, has voted to recommend to the City Council that the above referenced project be approved subject to conditions listed below: 1. That half street improvements a1c_ 3 the subject property front- ing Southwest of 109th Avenue be made prior to issuance of t, Lld- ing permits. 2. That the developer submit construction and site drainage plans to be approved by the City Engineer and Building Departments, with necessary bonds prior to issuance of building permits. 3. That the applicant receive site design review approval for grading, landscaping and site plan design. 4. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate depart- ment and changes are approved by that department. Applica- tion for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings, engineering specifications and other details requested by the department. No construction shall take place in these instances until after the changes have been approved. Any deviation from this condition will result in the immediate posting of a stop work order on the project or any portion of the project. This recommendation has been written in ordinance form and will be con- sidered by the City Council at its May 21st meeting, Fowler Junior High School, Lecture Room 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, 8:00 P.M. At that time- the imethe City Council. has the following options: approve, modify, deny, re- m,and back to the Planning commission or determine to hold a hearing on f Mr. Peter. Hoffman May 8, 1979 ZC 10-79 Page 2 the record established at the Planning Commission. No additional testimony will be taken by the Council at its meeting. You will. be provided written notice of. the Council's action. Sincerely, Ken Selby Associate City Planner KS:lm Note: The following acknowledgement must be received by the City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this letter Failure to return this acknowledgement may result in action by the City of Tigard. I hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard Plann- ing Commission. I have received and read this letter, and I agree to the decision here documented and to abide by any terms and/or conditions attach- ed. Signature date VAN DOMELEN/LOOIJENGA RECEIVED & ASSOCIATES 3609 Southwest Corbett Avenue APR 21 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 CITY OF TiGr'MD Phone 222-4453 i !, I i c 41t •��—uo� x/ �� P r Y i n y ycr U v :LOQ � o i u i i i In i ✓lf O J N * Q J \ w p OC 3W l i [ i i i u � �- (fl Z . . u • • 2 a � N P d am W R {�LL LL Y V• F Z A Z O O R R V v••N r1 e • � GI 0 0 2 Q t i [ [ s N• U M n N o w LL • � 8 LL v) N o o z W j v o..ou Qn -•Nn e 2 JJ2- m m M 1 a . Z r. a e• 2 Z W d!Q y . uC, 2WL o za .+uuM�+ w O W . r v o ♦ Jr t J 2 InU . U On P Il11n P1 d �p M Z O O 9W NM Q t .+ e N J t J • DLL. O Ir r A QU Ir u . df JO JR A IM a S W LL J VI t LL .•N P7 S yytl �• >W tt U O W ^ 8 •1 O J h- 1- • J J F- �-�-� n D t j A ' f •1' \ � G w�j� i:� t aE C� CD �,� yaa11� § R- nA �" $tea �� 6� i■�� Y h �d •\ ; Aa <<� Inm Iwo W c) C cn cn w N )o ti F v w g W Q LJZ3 CL l7 N O N 1 • N 4 W - ur W �FFti �t / as �AAP{I a -! 5i ;5 L R.pgf Et �qqVOyaO y p�pa� W�w rS Q l< E N t f 1 v�N e•1� r-r)P m � �'�_ 00 72 { e_ 0 0. — -- N E-4 tn Q•.r r > m N a tn W N 0 to X y f0 N X V N W � N �m � N •/' U Z y W y VI V • � N to 6 A Y Q u .4 �� 0. rn r 0 a N �j I oq �. In t•] T'- 0 0 6 W _ .-. IV r O O Cr J O f•O�c W N u J .•• ►•o • -- - 1 P e N It �. 1 00 ¢ rn z a 0 e In r N u O O W o 1 w L T 2 u _ r N O H r Q 4. i.l • 7 R �.,V+n O er q I O Q a 4 4 1• w n u. n1 n ri m S o R: a CL ¢ r U' VI•-•N M 7 _ U • W � • '2'. • • •N N �1 Nr -�` ❑ V1 V7 Q Q O O W �O � 1 e-+l/r�- W UO-•O • m N O O n 11 N O W O LL d N" O i 1 wW r, \+r Q LL N •-• LL � LL U' O P u ' ur �. O n. N O o M a •2-1 W ,.1 u U t! M -•N n :J rj �1 S Qt N J 7 z z w m 2,10 t tl 1D ! I W^ J w r o a .-•o u 1r1 __ 0 - W 0 •+W ► rN dONO Y •,,, • J a J i VI a a u r1 4 O m 1 0 O ¢N K ^ OCl O W T NO N W yl N J J • O LL J W Q' O C �' N 1 n U t 111 J O J a VI tt VI a : ►• p i w W :) ••W, u -.C) .N n O ;t O O W R- pZ 3 m U ► r • J J r 1-f � , • : m J ca) a 3 1 • • 4�Y 7 v� Yui db �/;•r• 1 N s n r'i Ju_ e •. U � � __ u O _ r .. N ci 2 �p u y -� �•�i� 1 w • J O M�.O^ 7� w fu G 2 .O• lu Ju IIJr l J N 4 Q J a w u u O O M a0 1u P/� 3 W W W P N P In u • • Z a, a- v • z f W • d W4VY Ln hZ SIO h N a Z O a o 6 • U V N M O 4 LL 0 0 0 7 0' • I [ I F • •O M s7 • R Oo o•+ W O v 1/�► W U O m Ln 1 vJ u m nrt • ? o • h ^_ f N O P P e N N A M M O W O V E w W 0 1 W V l'J OK U_ ^Q • O O 7, f W ! f OOU •+ JI T •�N Ma7 N I R M J •I, .- lD 2 2 W m m m R ff U' M 2 1 u L F �`..•. O 1 n L U U V Z; N W D W h h m K M O ♦ J 1 JmZ •JU a Um L1P •O O O L.W R a te? P P u f vl JO Jn a of < v h W O h✓1 f h > a o o ui h O H • • J J h•-h h Cj N j �ur i . E N b O � / \ �e• x g g 5$ ^ i k y f yt D 1 � l!Laa u � g ��iFS Fib��b � ••�5 A O O0 g44 9 V�C• O� �- +.bB � A n" •� � ti h� e�e i i a (n^ " �a o ba��a � ro .nom GR N x 11960 N tD u e-S.ti j rta rl _ I CL O In 4 0 "a 1 i ul In N K K 0. P T P ^ N 3 N T p P 17 in InO V Z a ell 'nr En •i a cn N 1 i `I 1 • ZW i � ... F. N / � �1 w w F ' 1 N ••Pe 1iAY pEt c � � to S„b�gaau �a - --__ en \ N 4 6 .ztn t~f�ll ul¢ $ o vV p=1�1 =•} ;D Gas",yyysyyy �^M1 N N cV 4 6 ✓ N,G agto W Ql • ¢ U) �, n ¢ u °.to N — F .�-. a E to H � i 2 to .7 ' z \ \ E 2¢ N4 w M I a yl i � <' O N W za w tr i m 0pM p n w o 7 . J M o I N U J O Q n ^ U N Q z n v n 4/ o ■ = 3 4 w M N O I a � U ¢ • • 7 Q �•v Ifl rl a W / �+ • n nn a } CL CL n ►- � uu•-N n w `� 000s • Qvc c � yl (; • ►- o O O W in• w u o v c tr e v N to no w � � -• In a . W w o- w < •'n v V h wOOQ u Q n n¢ ¢ 1 O C 2 f H W 7 M O Q V 12 Q•+J"• 2 .2 W an cc W ,J M M I ♦•W f f N P O O Q � ♦ -J a _l 2 If U f U J J •1 O V k 7 W R m I ■ J J J ut o tr� 1 1 C3 ++ cz n s o ► 2 a ] w 7 r; i ¢ u m .- � Q o o w o .- • J J �� ►- W j a k m i' m ; 1 +:N fn.r n W • .2 i^.N i nom.N.N iZ 111 a +. U \ ', UJ a i i1 n:.. = z o 1 1 I +~ ya1 0 lu I�L •�Njy� YM. ►.►•• • MU rNll.III n .� T 3 :e c, w..� W ,:�: o: V .u o a u r W N r it f J.:. ,:..I.w■nffw LL Q 1 Y O !W! J O l YI rOu. 1 O W �w .✓• � I N 000,.. �J• M JU 0r � f 1 O O W • r h n . �w o ■ r I r � - R. N • 1 1 u • •r r.N. o a Oct 10 . ■v t.t f f f / IC, • �O rH W •Ir�O \ `v �� S f oZ .. a ^u..-Nr o W Ad f J A J O J► O y r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _� a' �� ` s' � N C Y t e c� �aE v� N � E4dEf 1- ��Aa N c�E qa a R: ylr Vlm {Kd5 la 0 n u FF .ry O- rJ ri..i lonwa '* C� a ol u jyy� to ¢; v°i N on N x -- o }t 3 0 H w o .. 1 ff N N v ! .r„] I a In f J a 1 w r .I g v Ch .e Y N N Nm v' Z I 1 Ind 1 \ ti i x 1 _ 1 cr a ry t p O bb •�j N tt 1 IESX�Aa -g Cx �Y aERra3 Y- a W��pa Ei�ii9cw � J� 4,wwSi w•-. t 2S x � t iwxll4�44Ga8L'r IO i � � � � wpb orv3"E � •r ,n i� f o-N 2 y el f i o ' , cn Nrr E O ° a e-� 10 T � x - N S � R: � u u i MCk. k. i S En aJ y, CL l"t A T € tr 1Z tina In CI 1 1 m 2S •n z - n IL � :om i t N b 4E •I F � J. � do (^� tn a• •Y ' U ��1CjO V w L AAAA� ??. 7 1 I =! • �+- _�!.�.V. W ni E 0 AN VA 7 it ' .s a� n�wSEw�a Y J O d j v E E E a a "o p m o < F� ? y w`J eir a r o F cc*3N=la 0 V rev "i..ma O W Zzu - a is oa .� f a v k alp z a I c� M !j too M b ri t� 0 v y 1� 88E �w 10 �1 E b x a In N .Ji M ' a p. O a � a �4 x h _ . ' o an n o • R �1 O O w � Ic u L 1 N V 0 w w • kIN9k:N� r, � ,� ,� Ch Cc, mob/ �„U� ..o✓•k`�r � � �� e0 ❑ V m � a pY M s v' Q ` N a A Q NIn i Q! N N O O[ .mr C1 r 7 " a V Y n m u U D� - Y Y Y C N to . V C 4 Y u c j0 n i 1F � .• � J M i o O' n my Q a WQOT ib '" OGC y d In c � z Y it 'n ❑' • vl m u U a x oa x g m y u o `J n C N r v> N 41 U V W J N M J N^ S ` T C, 0. I fj W o z V) D.— r,In a N 2 O Z o ♦v 1 CY. �e � f. •+ vi w�i Z T 8 ? as a a ¢r 0 r s = In i 7 L: ui 1 1 E VF-f al w n F 7. pW; ;4 cc .n u � n 8 y � r9 H U � � n F• r .+ m a CL In rY- 07 _. ❑ � � � � H � %Vl CIO v� r. � I Ri W •I n k Y y I n a 00>. a ( I r C a V 5 y 9 $ Q 17•i U 41 a CL a In e H..n J M LL n VAN DOMELEN/LOOIJENGA & ASSOCIATES 3604 S.W. CORBETT STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PORTLAND. OREGON 2224453 Job Job Number Date Subject: Telephone Call 1-1 With Conference L] With Field Observation [4 With r`.__ �L�,. .x'37 / '/ � <�S/ .,✓Ft-�`�. / ---- �-�-F�,�--,�c�"4��'��'-�-�R�•� G�amu/ a�!�!� Distribution �- -- — Y r HOFFMAN & HOFFMAN, INC. 1888 SOUTHWEST MADISON PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 (503) 228-2800 Mr. . Ed Walden City of Tigard Building Dept. 12420 S. W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Ed: The enclosed is 1 copy of a letter we received from David W. !ial:�tead, whom we have consulted with on previous occasions and �-:ho we had look at the trees at Canterbury for damage. The letter is self explanatory though grammatically a little confusing! It does give his opinion that the trees on the site are healthy and well taken care of and the survival rate should be very good. Very truly yo, rs, Peter B. Hof man PBH/hl enc 1. RECEIVEDFEB 2 61979 OREGON ARBORICULTURE C O. "Specialists in the care and ltresrn-ntiun of trees" Y.+ David Halstead:Consultant P.O. BOX 68478,OAK GROVE,OREGON 97268 Phone: 232.8197 or 638-5775 w February 22, 1979 Mr. Peter Hoffman 1888 S.W. Madison Portland, Ore 97205 k. Dear Mr. Hoffman: You have asked me for a letter stating my opinion on the condition of the trees relative to the site and its new buildings. v I beleive a tremendous job has been accomplished in saving as many trees as there are. There were some mistakes mostly with those machines which must do the digging. T have been with the project as a consultant from the beginning, except when the trees were being removed for road and building sites. The amount of expence in trimming and fertilizing which y_ has already been completed has been very high. The results of this, `r l' however is showing, for we had very little damage from the ice storm. The health of those trees remaining at this writing is very good. Some back fill and root pruning needs to be completed before april . If you follow through with the fertilizing at that time as I have lined out plus 1 a good watering program and periodic inspection by an arborist. I can see no reason that this project could not serve as a model to those con- tractors developing building sites on tree laden lots. Thank you. ''i1T�ccr^ly, IDavid ia�:;tend DWH:pv I1 �1 I .r , i i THE ... VAN LOM :: r` ( KRAXf3EP,GER RMTN P,SHIP ARCHi T EC TS PIANIN R E S A.I.A. February 20 , 1979 Raleigh Hills Professional Bldg. 4455 S.W Scholls Ferry Road Portland, Oregon 97225 (503) 292-8895 City of Tigard P . O . Box 23557 1 12420 S . W . Main Tigard , Oregon 97223 Re : Canterbury Woods +1 Gentlemen : There has been some question as of late regarding the legality J of an additional amount of upper floor area proposed for the Canterbury Woods housing development . Particular emphasis has been placed on the approval of the original P - D. and hour this relates to what is currently being constructed . I would like to point out that the initial approval was , in fact , granted on a three-story concept ( see site plan enclosed plus ,,mitten submittal material ) . These units , to be sure , were one , two and three-story units combined into one building . The currlen-E—proposa-l" is !or a two story development . The neer loft space addition was an afterthought proposed because of the amount of open (unusable space) evident once the trusses r•rere set in place . Nate that the addition takes advantage of the existing building configuration-- it does not add to it . The change is an interior , not exterior alteration . Since the space is open to the 1iv-ing area it act,, as a loft or 7.ezzanine level . On page 45 of the Uniform Building Code the definition of mezza-• nine is listed as "an intermediate floor placed in any story or room" . If that area is less than 33 1 /3% of the total of the room it. occupies it will not be considered a floor. The proposal for, Canterbury Woods is for a loft. addition of 212 square feet and therefore could be considered a floor• _y_ definition . This addition is allowed unTer fable 5- Q,page 61 of tfi^Gniforrl luilding Code which states that if the building is of UQ�hour construction , a three-story building is prr•ahis- sible . Additional structural_ engineering with reyar•d to thr•ee- story structures (.e .-, equivalent 3x4 studs at 16" o . c . on i 1 or:-er floor) will also be carried through by the Owner. 1 I i February 20 , 1979 City of Tigard Page 2 Since the original approval for three-story units was approved at the time the P . D. was granted , I assume this will not be an issue . There is no requirement which states that the height must be consistant with that of the underlying district in a P . D . This reference to underlying zones applies to lot coverage and lost size . The __district makes no mention, of building heLgbt, and in fact in 10. :,6 . 050 the Code is very specific, "In cases of conflict be,.r•reen standards of the underlying dis- trict and the Planned Development district , the standards of the Planned Development district shall apply . " (Ord. 71 -4 Exh . "A" 1971 ; Ord . 70-32 S 185 . 3 . 1 1970. ) In our instance the three-story-concept was clearl_y_s.ho�an , discussed and was approved as part of the P. D. This project is in keeping with the purpose of a Planned Develop- ment which states as it ' s purpose " . . . to provide opportunities to create more desirable environments through the application of flexible and diversified land development standards under a comprehensive plan and program professionally prepared . The planned development: district is intended to be used to encourage the application of techniques . . .which will result in s-aperior livin_q�or development arrangements , with lasting values.'' Better utilization o proposed structures such as loft spaces would follow that intent. We propose therefore to follow the previous rrrovals through zoning with regard to three-story structures . In addi �ion we will make those buiId_ing_s conform"-to fie qne-tiQur requirements and of the Uniforml6ulding Code .— ! Yours very truly , I THE V N LON/KRAXrERGER PARTNERSHIP A . T .A . 110__ eT.h M . Van Lam , A . I . A. Arclii tect cc : Mr . Peter Hoffman State of Oregon , Fire and Life Safety , Salem, Oregon , I CITY OF TIGARD BLDG. DEPT. 12426 S.W. MAIN STREET TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE 639.4171 CONTRACTOR: Pursuant to Section(s) of the Uniform Building Code, the following item(s) require correcting: y 7aIe: �-` _-� Permit No. Inspector CALL FOR REINSPECTION am ■er a a � a �r i i NQ 20%r, BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 1OF 1T TIGARD DATE-_ THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR APERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUILDER PHONE — 'OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OWNERPHONE LOT No lry t�c�r s ptu. OWNER 1'minrt v, I-jnr't ia[1 JOB ADDRESS ' HOME ADDRESS _ .,�. ARCHITECT ENGINEER BUILDER ADDRESS DESIGNER STRUCTURE ❑NEW _ ❑Rf MODEL ❑AUDITION ❑REPAIR ❑RENEWAL GFIRE DAMAGE. ❑DEMOLITION ❑EDUCATIONAL ❑GOV'T ❑REI.IGIOUS❑PATIO ❑CARPORT ❑GARAGE ❑STORAGE❑SLAB ❑FENCE ❑ RESIDENCE ❑COMM L_IBOND ❑MOVING ❑CONDITIONAL USE ❑DESIGN REVIEW ❑COUNCIL APPROVED _ ❑SIGNS OCCUPANCY LAND USE ZONE— ___BLDG.TYPE FIRE ZONE—_ PLAN CHECK BY� _ ____. HEAT Lit L,i'k3.i1l�,rs �jayiwl It Sturm. !Ta.trigd..ifl. __ ----- -------.... vil u�r yl.•i��;, � �.JURd r�F C' T��Rilatl J„ _ ---_ ----_ _ OCQ._LQAD ___F Q-GRJ.4AQ.- ------_1��IGHT �__1V9 Z4AI�S. AREA U.BE-QHOOMS "— BUILDING DEPARTMENT SET BACKS FRONT REAR L GFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE Permit n -- ---..,_.-------._- THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING Plan Check REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE -- WORK WILL. BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH SUb-total ALL APPLICAB,_E CODES AND ORDINANCES THE ISSUANCE OF THIS 7ERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE - RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS State Tax LICENSE. SEPARATE PERMITS REOUIRED FOR SEWER, PLUMBING AND HEATING. Total By - _ i...---- ApOroved +a S., 1? ,,pt Nri (:ITY1 Ei��" ___/— 1� 1�p,21O J / _�JILDING PERMIT APPLICATION uF 4[J DATE 'F JERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR APERMIT FUR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUILDER PHONE___ 4�41�;SHCWN AND AP ROVED IN, :HE ACCOMPANYING PI1NS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNERPHONF __LOT NO,r.c8 �� HOME ADDRESI ARCHITECT t ENGINEER R __ —ADDRESS + UNE NEW ❑FIE MODEL DADUITION r DRE PAIR ❑RENEWAL OF IRE DAMAGE - (]DEMOLITION rvcF ❑COMM_DEDUCATIONAL DGOV'T DRFIIGIOUSDPATIO ❑CARPORT DGARAGE DSTORAGEDSLAS []FENCE ❑MOVING �-[:]CONDITIONAL USE ❑DESIGN REVIEW ❑COUNCIL APPROVED ❑SIGNS LAND USE ZONE_—.. _BL bG TYPE_.,• FIRE ZONE,_-- PLAN CHECK BY------ - F_I MR.LQAD...-.—_- - H ---____AF1E6 .---- NO BEDR(QMSJ_� �1 B!III OI NG DEPARTMENT SET BACKS I HONT �—_ REAR _ LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE I'rmit - - - - THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUEJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING Plan Check c - -- r REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE - -- WORK WILL BE DONE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS ANN SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH `�uh 10181 _ ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTrACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS 'te Taxj._ - A! LICENSE. SEPARATE PERMITS RFOUIRED FOR SEWER, PLUMBING AND HEATING. TotalBY -- - Ff APPI ICAN1 Op AGENT Appi oved / Pipl No. NOVI DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—PLANS REVIEW SECTION NOTICE OF PANS REVIEW ROOM 976,STATE OFFICE BUILDING, PORTLAND 97201 .{�6 & (THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT) �• Building CANTE.f�7 URY WOODS APARTHLNTS _SW 109TH & CANTERBURY LANE---__ No 78-1591-B Building---------- — _ Address in MRD County WASHINGTON Occupency _R'1Y Const.—.V--N—_.___ Sound Value SEE 78-159�r�pee Architect D W KRAXBERGER New Bldg.tjj Addition ❑ Alteration ❑ Date Received 10/24/78 _ Owner P.OFFMAN & HOFFMAN INCe Address 1888 SW MADISON: PORTLANDDate Reviewed _10/30/78 Stories 2 Are, 7910 /N S Attic $T / YES Fire Wells._._L.S Fire Escapes NtS_— Exits—8 / 24 ft. Main Fir. Basement Ht. Stops Tot Width Stairs YES / NO_ Vert. Shafts N/S /. Sprinklers NIS/_.;/_�� Man. Alarm N/S_ SP NISI / I. Ext. _N/`S / 'lose- Ht. Dat YES SMOKE/WSOOM Ploor OD es Ceing edBD_ R..ICONC TTL�tr. Membersl'wor� S Class WOODNO. GYP BD Type S Area Covd. ALS— NIP N S Wall cover /—T_____ Htr, rm. anti. N1 Type flue �_ Type Hty. System _��. _� Fuel Est. Int. The submitted plans have been reviewed for conformity with fire protection statutes and regulations of Oregon admin- istered by this office. Items No. Ill 20„ 26m 28 — checked on the enclosed list are applicable. These items and any specially noted provisions must be incorporated into the project to meet current fire protection regulations. Approval of submitted plans is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office or of noncumplian.e with any applicable requlations of local Government. REMARKS: -.0—THIS IS A T-I<RE___MD_L.IE SAFEM.PLAN._RFVIEW-..GQVERING .THE 00—N-$=.ION OF-TWO IDENTI AL-BU_ILDINCs_Ir�D7_EATE4._TO_�3E IN-FIRE_Z41�IE__3. __THIS REVIEW IS_BASED-ON_THE_FIRE LIQ SAFETY PORTIO.N_S GF-ME-,`Z6ST,ATE_-QFQRE4c N-STRV0TUWL_SfF4- IAL2X-QQDE&- __-- 2)--.TRE r3-U1LD N_G_JS =UI-RED TO BE 0_F_SXE--.HQ.IIR.FIRE-RE SISTIVE-CQNSTRLLCTIQN-=ER-Z-XQN-_ BEARING- WALLS (Fg,=.WAILE_EXCLUD"_AAYJa UNPROTECTED. __SRCTIOR 1302(hl. ME-- CEILINGS S QRL.ARE--N-OT ISC:EILINGSSHQRL.ARE--NOT APPROVED_ON):,-HQUR_FIRE-RESISTIVE_ CONSTRUCTION-AS- REQUIRU, 3)_HANDRAILS IAL�BE_ PJ>< CED_ NOT LESS TIIADL-20 INCHFS_NOR riORE_ TtIA [IISNC�iES�AH4 MLE -- Examined by PAGE 1 of 2 Copies to:API'LICANT,FILE iDEPUTYrGFPrzQWNFR:BLf)CeDEPT.AFIRE DEPT•RELECe PRs 2 31•2e1e5•81e DEPARTMINT OF COMMERCE—PIANS REVIEW SECTION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW ROOM 576#,�TATE OFFICE BUILDING, PORTLAND 97201 rTHIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT 1fi�le Building CANTER URY WOODS APARTMENTS_ SW IOQT11 & CANTERBURY LAN': Ne, 7H-1591-B BulHing Address I��_—_ -- NOSI_NG OF TREA�,��T�iE�S�IQL,L�_pE CONTINUOU_=�'lIE FULL_LENGT}I OF_. t{E STA',RSs-AN- AT LE 1SIy. O�tE _jJML)RAIJ�SRALL EXTEND NOT LESS_ TII_AN 6 INCHES BEYOND THE TOP. AND BOT�'OM RISERS AND ENDS SHALL ��;E�URNE OR SHALL TBRPIINATE IN NEWEL .POSTS.,OR. SAM TERMINALS. SECTION 3305(1). 4 EA VE VENTS SHALL NOT_BE. _LOCATED WY I TIN_7_FEET_MEASURED_LATERALLY ABOVEW_INDOW OR_.DOOR_5) FIREPLACE AND_CI{IMNE UNITS ARE-TO-BE. APPROVED AND USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR_ _ _6)_PL_S ARE ACCEPTABLE S_UIiJECT_TOTHE ITEMS NOTED ABOVE AND n , APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITIESHAVING JURISDICTION. PA C.,E 2 u f 2 WW ! ! ! DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE-PLANS REVIEW SECTION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW ' •> .,, . ROOM 376, STATE OFFICE BUILDING,PORTLAND 97201 #fl 2 3 /+ 5 8. 9 (THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT) *y, •'- "eM"'M 'AT6AI'J}Y'W DS APARTMENTS SW 109TH & CANTERBURY LANE 78-1591-A JBuilfling No. )pyi WASHINGTON Building R-1 Addret�_N TI�AR� 1 520 000 755.62 County Oc:upancy -- C-nst. Sound Value- a__plan Fee_ Architect De We KRAXBERGER New Bldg. ff Addition ❑ Alteration [-] Date Received 10/24/78 ownor -110FFMAN & HOFFMANs I Ice Address 1888 SW MADISONJORTLAND Data Reviewed 10/30/78 Stories 2 Area 6328 / NIS Attic 81 / YES Fire Walls NIS_ Fire Escapes N/S Exits 6 /. 18 ft. Mein Fir. Basement Mt. Stops ��*� Tot.Width Stairs _J.YES ./—NQ- Vert. Shafts NLS / - Sprinklers .N1�/--/_—T-____ Man. Alarm NIS S S.P. ._N'eIS/_- /.-- Cws Closed No Yet Area:overed Int. Size Ext. Ext. NIS / - Ht. Det. 5 S /B/E�OM, Floor WOOD Ceiling GYP-IM Roof C9NC TIV. Members WOOD C'VOOD No. GYP B Ivve N/Sea cevd. N S N S N S Well cover / nlftr. rm. encl. — Type flue __�---Type Htg. System —_L_ Fuel Ext. Int. The submitted plans have been reviewed for conformity with fire protection statutes and regulations of Oregon admin- istered by tlTis office. Items No. 11200 261 28 ___ _ checked on the enclosed list are applicable. These items and any specially noted provisions must be incorporated into the project to meet current fire protection regulations. Approval of submitted plans is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office or of noncompliant(- with any applicable regulations of local qovernment. REMARKS: _O THIS IS A FIRE _AND LIFE S FA 'ETY PLAN REVIEW COVERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF EIGHT ICA IDENTLBUILDINGS INDICATED W--BE IN FIRE _�QNE 3-,_-�'kIIS REVIEW IS BASED ON THE FIRE & .LIFE__SAFFTY PORTIONS OF THE 1976 STATES 0E-0_RECON SAF LJCTURAL -SPECIALLY CODE. _ ?)._-TUE_ B LDI G IS_1tEC�1RRRD Z'0 BE_OONE-HOU} FIRE-_1�EETIVE_CONSTI1CrIUN EXCEPT NOt� _BEARING WALLS JPARTY WALLS ED) UNPRO'�EFED,`SECTION 1302(b). THE CEILINGS SHOWN ARE NOT APPROVED ONE-HOUR IRE-RES-I.ST1YE CONSTRUCTION-AS R9QLq_EDo _- -3)_HANDM--ILS SHALL-BE-_RLACED NOT-LESS THAN 30 INCHES_NOR MORE THAN. 34 INCHES ABOVE THE Examined b PACE 1 of ?_ APPLICANTSFTLEiDEPUTYgSFM*OWNE _. i, T1iC-'$L►F'1:;ELLC�- Copies to: --_��..---�---- — ---- PP;2 SP•265E5-8I4 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE-PIANS REVIEW SECTION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW ROOM 376,STATE OFFICE BUILDING PORTLAND 97201 THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT C.AICTfOUAVViDS APARTMENTSY SW 109T11 & CANTERBURY LANE No. 78-1591-A Building Address— TL%JA� .-building NOSING OF_TREADSe THEY S11;ALN-TINUO_ US TEIE FULL-LENCTU OF THE !T&IRS,AND.-..AT_ LEA.c`'T_ ONE HANDRAIL SHALL EXTEND NOT LESSTHA 6-INCHES_ BEYOND-TUE- TOP AND BOTl'1.q-RISERS-AND-_ENDS-.SHALL BE RETURNED OR SHALL TE INATRIR-NEVEL. . OSIS OR SAFETY TERMINALS& .-SELfION_-33.05(.1)... )-- 4 SAVE VENTS SHALL NOT BE LOCATE )LTII NIIN 3_FEET MEASURED LATERALLY ABOVE WINDO-W. OR DOOR.— -- -- OPENINGS IN THE WALL BFLOCJo__$ECTIQI�-�.�Q_�(c)�---._------- --.. ------ - - --- --- - -- 5 FIREPLACE AND_,CHIMNEY UNITS AR) .POSE-APPROVED_AND-USED IN ACCORDANCE-WI.TLL-TIIEIR LISTINGS. _SECTION_ 3707-Ca). _— _6) PL-ANS ARE ACCEPTABLE SiIBJECT_TO. THE_.ITEMS_NOTED ABOVE. Q►ND THE APPROVAL-OF TIAE--_-_ -_._ AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. _ — --------- - - PAGE 2'-of 2 • STATE OF OF r,GON Adopted 1-1-78 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE: Fire 6 Life Safety PLANS REVIFW SECTION Plan Review Number CHECK-MARKED REGULATIONS, IN ADDITION TO ANY REQUIREMENTS APPEARING ON THE ATTACHED REVIEW NOTICE, MUST BE INCORPORATED INTO THIS PROJECT. Approval of submitted plans does not constitute approval of any omissions or oversights nor of noncompliance with any applicable regulations of local government that may exceed State requirements. 1. Structure required to be Type throughout due to area, height, occupancy, __Fire 'Lone. 2. One-hour fire resistance rating required for all interior construction. 3. All living wits required to be completely separated by one-hour fire resistive construction. 4. Exit corridors require separation from any other area by one-hour fire resistive construction. Sec. 3304(g) 5. Door assemblies of interior openings to corridors ere required to have a fire resistance rating of not less than 20 minutes and must be self-closing or automatic-closing. Reliqhts in corridors require wired glass set in fixed (steel) framing. See 1973 State Structural Specialty Code, Sections 3304(h) and 4306. 6. Storage rooms, closets, laboratories, shops arid areas of similar hazard require separation from other areas by at least one-hour fire resistive constriction. Furnace and boiler rooms require one-hour fire resistive construction. 7. All vertical openings such as stairways, trash chutes, etc., require full enclosure of one-hour, two-hour fire resistance. Access ways to such shafts require self- closing and latching Class B fire door assemblies one-hoer rated, one and one-half hour rated. Sec. 1706 R. Attic areas require draft barriers as per Sec. 3205, not exceeding each 3,000 square feet. (9,000 square feet where sprinkler protection provided) Sec, 3205 �. Voids created by ceiling-floor systems require draft barriers not exceeding each 1,000 square feet. Sec. 2517(f) 11). Building projections such as balconies, eaves, overhangs, etc., require fire protection as per Z. 1976 State Structural Specialty Code, Section 1.710. Fire •;tops, blocking or framinq members pierced for utility rune require parking to equal fire resistance prior to much piercing. Wood frame construction requires firestopping of both vertical and horizontal draft cpenings at maximum intervals of 10 feet. Sec. 2517(f) 1 '. Corridors require at least 6 faet in clear width. Drinking fountains or other equipment may not operate in a manner which would obstruct the minimum 6 foot width. Sec. 3317 1 Handrails are required on all stairways. Stairways over 44" wide need handrails on both sides. Sec. 3305 1 .. Open Stair railings and guardrails shall have intermediate rails or closures with no openings large enough to pass a 9" sphere. sec. 1716 1 ,. Exit doors from lobbies, corridors and rooms with potential occupancies of 50 or more are required to owing in the direction of exit travel. Sec. 3303 J ,. Exit cloors from lobbies, corridors and assembly areas require panic hardware. 1 '. Hardware for all doors required for egress is required to be of simple type havinq no pro- visions for locking against egress, will, obvious method of operation. Flush bolts other than listed automatic are not acceptable. Sec. 3303 (See exception) 1,1. At least 44" (inches) in clear width, without projections, is required for exits and patient room doors through which patients must be transported in wheelchairs, stretchers or beds. Sec. 1318 Sleeping rooms require at least one window readily openable from inside without special tools and providinq a clear opening of not less then 5.7 square feet. The minimum net clear opening height dimension shall be 24 inches. The minimum net clear opening width dimension shall be 20 inches. Where windows are provided as a means of egress or rescue they shall have a finished sill height not morn than 44" (inches) above the floor. (Over) 4/20. surface flame spread rates of walla and ceilings, minimum requirement: stairway - 25, corridors - 75, other rooms - 200. Sec. 4203 21. Combur ,le acoustical material required to be secured with staples or equivalent metallic holders or a heat resistant adhesive capable of withstanding 1000°F for one-ha'` hour. Sec. 4202 22. All curtains, drapes and simular furnishings are required to be noncumbustible or rendered and maintained flameproof. Sec. 4205 2.3. With standard spacing, rows of seats between aisles may not exceed 14. Rows of seats opening onto aisles at one end only may not exceed 7 seats. Also see continental spacing, Se... 3313 - 3314 24. Standard seat row spacing must provide a space of at least 12 inches from the back of one seat to the front of the most forward projection of the seat immediately behind. Sec. 3314 25. Posting of capacity of assembly areas as rioted is required by State structural Code, Sec. 3301(j) ,----'2 6. Heating, cooking, air conditioning and similar service equipment are required to be approved and listed by a nationally recognized testing agency, such as U.L., Inc., and to be in- stalled in compliance with agency's specificat ons and recognised safe practices. The installation of ventilation systems is required to be in substantial conformity with the 1976 Mechanical Specialty Code. Corridors are not acceptable for use as supply or return air plenums. 27. A dust collection system is required for shop areas for nonportable machines emitting or producing dusts. (Ref: Sec. 1008) Dust collection equipment to be located outside of building or in one-hour separated room equipped with automatic sprinklers. (. 8. A.S.M.E. approved pressure relief valvae are required for all water heaters, installed either in separate water tank port or in port for hot water line. Shutoff valves may not be located between a water tank and relief ve've. 29. A firefighting water supply is required within 500 feet of building that is capable of producing 500 gpm (minimum) for 10 minutes for each 5,000 square feet of floor area within building up to a maximum of 500 qpm for 30 minutes, or provide a 5,000 to 15,000 gallon reserve water supply as required. 30. Interior wet standpipes at least 2 inches in diameter located and equipped as per Sec. 3804 are required. Couplings and connections required to be American National Standard Thread. Whe•e standpipes are served by sprinkler piping, see 1973 NEPA Pamphlet 013, 3-7.7. Sec 3804 31. Approved automatic sprinkler protection throughout occupancy is required. 3.1. Approved automatic sprinklers are required over and under stage and in all auxiliary areas, including dressing rooms,, storerooms and workshops. (Sec. 3802) 33. Stage roof ventilators displacing at least 5% of stage floor area, openable by hand from stage floor and by fusible link or other heat activated device, are required. (Sec. 3901-06) 34. Ar: approved fire alarm system conforming to 1972 NFPA Pamphlet 072-A with signals audible thro,ighout building and manual alarm sending stations adjacent to exits from each floor or area are required. 3 22" X 30" acceme to attic spaces is required per Section 3204. It All exit doors and Access ways thertto Are required to be identified by approved electrically illuminated signs served by two circuits with one aeperate from all other circuits. Sec. 3312 3". An emergency power system is required for the gymnasium, auditorium, building to maintain exit illumination for not less than one-half hour in event of public utility failure. Sec. 3312 1 . Ptuorescent light fixtures installed on combustible surfaces are required to be u.L., Inc., approved for such mounting, or installed to provide at least one and one-half inch air space between the fixture housing and combustible material. 30. Conformance with all requirements for the removal of architectural barriers to the handi- capped to required in compliance with Chapter 31, d NOTES: 1. Local regulations or insurance standards for most fa,,orable insurance credit may, and often do, exceed these minimum State requirements. 2. This review does not cover O.S.R.A. (O.S.H.A.) regulations. 3. This review does not cover Medicare-Medicaid regulations. 4. Oregon State Health DeparlMnt. `,2fie T�� Y SZvo�t �P�{t�.� a / 37e r Sur i / o � � V � v r 1 5�4 70 � (v XY � r �Km xiqaw ' r H 7' 77-1409 GE��.eAr' fINO .%c�Ns/sTs �� TiYf - drs/. S��Tro�v e' /AX !OT �.ReVI /Nr rVN. G/T.Y Or 1AP ¢3/B /.5 u�co , Fd�2 . .1 coi"E 5 rt7 P,/`f: f��A//vA 6� QL/f�NT/91E'�• y�'fFf S/'r< ��Nr</e,F�/r/� l? � <oPi �PA•"/N� F /5 . / �• c^c �- 7-//mac l�F• r�^i/FM's'//?'D n/ nvw f'oo,P G ewss Cw�� v�e� lie ago 1, VIA/ s/TE 5• /y y G.d _ D off- V,-Z) ¢✓Fa 7 P61 AID L' t � �/f,C'-i .>r��P�/�Ce. f�va�_' c5•P_AsS ..Si/.IfA-tt� � r t•7ter`A. re o'..'. f .2,!P,S-7 /o 7 i4✓a D: T= '�?X lam.5�= ��8?!/i+. L3 2,$d -�-- r w -e— '0 S• 0 0-9 nL O,OS L/�� t,,.G.Jr? ?U fb/✓1� fpovl'. �.B' ✓ ti,vs.B. Mori+ ¢•SJ,e o•f X 2.2.0 N w N W rW 7;f�V77OW '7 A e, -7.27 !9,z/ 3 97 IOAP4e .?71a 3 Gy¢ 14e v q i� 3769 A5- 4e 3. 4 V 7*4 31s ;1oi 4e 3 7 79 Zg-w 7 mod AD _ M,.-4J P.e) on . P8 P PAS KIN 2 ' 423. _. —IAM 5 T 0 .24 Q Q C , y H O 42B. 1 N) 4162`, / 420 71 s FIG.GINTENSITY <<: xhEC •1'A1'10N AI (1110 vuu •600 ]u ( ,•! suo 7 •I �'; ; LL rc✓ ,n \ ' 400 U :5 F • . L. •„ I ju0 L IU 200 Ejc'c W z YO- Q :,,..',!,'rr,:;' ,/r.•,'r d/iu, :'J,+• !,� w x w f! 7p fir/J i Poor I&J3 f- 1 ill FJ/•OYC/land Moor, fa flO•N JI l+'I f 2 Sur/Yce d U W (" /t 7 .`a/•Oih h/7o,c,wwl,a hn:/yf dC/s.r.A• Ll 1. u _ o'' 0 C al c'6ur1A j OS•Ando•iYch-s01,vv- a -100, -loo- 4,er Oici D\` o �� O u 6 F• 90 Sur/ace I N � Conten/ro/wn /i•+c h • I Cr tl. 70 Gross 1 s o 1 t fi//Cr/75 Cur„80 • 50 40 3o LU 20 00 to 30 40 50 f/070 80 90 1-' , JtO DURATION IN MIND 1 1 i h' I -Conee/v/rulivr� /!+„r ,,, • ,',, 10 6 FIG. H OVERLAND FIG. J- VALL IES 01 � I FLOW TIME. RAINFALL INTENSI _r)'- UU1;/\II0I,J 'Fieprodilced /ruts Mrsre//one+.. a <'ub/!cu/+csn A/0 ?04(, VS. Oc.V/', ul liq.iru,'/+ . *•Nolo/co from fny.'nee/iny Mor.+r+i/ o/ the 'Wo”, L.)e,vor"mvn/; /i/r/ /I/ !-il,:.. ! I.f r1r , � M ihl e — 5UU •'�, 1� Ihfu,l 400 20U EXAMPLE • 700 15U Height 100 F 1 R00 UengIh=3,000 F1 lime of concenlroU0n=I4Mrn IUO 150 tlU L IFU - 100 60 I(.J,000 50 \f`1P1F 40 0 00 ` S,000 30 a 40 25 30 ^ k00 2 U s NOW o - RU Use nomograph Tc for natural ~ 2,000 C Ib E basins with well defu,ed r.hannels, o _ I'wu rx for overland flow on bu,e U) = v r our Ih,ond for nruwed gruea rood- C — 1,000 10 ii-do channels , _ ° - 6 Y o _ For owrlund 110 , grossed Sur- faces, E - --•� F faces,multiply TC Uy 2_ E r 6 u 6 For ove!lund flow, concrete or o - 600 6 asphulf surfaces, multiply Tr; 4 - 3.8 by 0 4 100 For conuele chunnels,m0lt ply 3 R Iso 100 00.6,on olvd, by P t KOprch, Gal EnOtrwerrng,Vol 10,No 6, .unit 11140,, 162 M FIG.G IN•I• ENSI `I-Y EXPECTA[UN FOR UNE-HUHH HAIM-Al I :.:Go +, ►• aa, O lV S 17&_ ruo 600 )q ' 500 PL✓Cd aooof ur 7 IL r suo M 1 4. U 0 w ,L 6 c:t ti :o U 200 )Oil (W J Z {dor�u 0 .. Sur a ( U 0. h ,0 7 a i cc 11091, 4erOtai p U 1 6 nra an sur/act , r ��.\ 70 Otnst \ A'pi �,,t„ ,Y d 5 .� •�'` ! ,Jr' / 60 ✓.i.,,r. r OIO 20 ! ? 1 40 20 a �= 7.SM r,y. U l0, 20 30 AU No u0 /o bo 91, ,. r Mh 1,N, I I iii OUNAtIUIJ IN MIND 11 :) c'OncenMulr, 1 1. , � t, ,;r.lt 10 0 FIG. H- OVERLAND FIG. J VALUES OF i. FLOW TIME. RAINFALL INTENSITY- UURAIION. �RtVrodvctdlrorsr M,aca//oneo�s OuDl,cntron N'olc», [:'.; Oce' u.' A� t.0 rl.•.•, �. r,. t 4aecolcoF 1r' Eng.'ncer'ing Manuu! of the /Y'cai• vr.Uui:'.»tont; lt� ! �(// ('r,,,,, 1,', l 1,►' •r I I , 1 +.:S _ poo T, IM,ni 00 EXAMPLE 100 Height a I00F1 170 Length a3,000F1 Time of cancenlrolwn+14M1n 100 do L IF 110 100 1u,0uu 60 5,000 - 30 �� 7 l _ 25 5.000 c 2C) Note'. ;• ' ° ^t0 Use nomograph Tc for natural 2,000 \ 15 0 basins with well delined chunrNls, ° -: 1,500 c for overland flow on bur• q, 0 - 10 sof th,ond for moweU 4rUe6 rood- _ 1,000 c r gyp` side chPnnels • - 6 t for averlund flow, grassed our- � E totes,multiply Tc by 2 - - �_ 6 a 1 For overland flow, c1)156rits or o Gua 5 asphalf surfoc#s, multiply Tc - • r' by 0.4 300 For concrete channels,multiply - 3 TcbyG2 too 150 - 2 oil 100 s 60644 M sower by P.2 Iliryrsh, civil 9weeries,vol 10,Ne 6,rAtrN 1940,0 362 Ilii. .J... , ..v (�+ ._.._.j � ._..__�.......�. i _�_. •. 1 ,; I � i . F•i.� i �' • i I ��.�w , � I�1 I I � i ►.L I-I ' � �_ _ .....�...._ _... _ ..._._..._ 1 � I � � � � . ... 2.V I , � i _ I I .....� ' I ' i i I I i � � �.. I.•I ♦ � � .� � � I I ,, '�5 I i �I I I � , �- � � � I �'�...,,,,. --,, ��//� ' �V � r1� ti0 V11 vv �1rd l..y �, /'�V .wv wa • . � •• 1 � , � ~ , � � / . ' , . /' , , ,. . . � - � . 4 • ' � • , ' International C,mference of Building Officials f 5360 SOUM WOKKMAN MILL ROAD WHITTII R; CALIFORNIA 90601 • (213) 699.0541 July 28 , 1977 OFFICERS OFFIC_SOFTHE PRESIDENT EXE%IITI%L CIRECTOR GAYLORD C.DOW D,P.B. T.H.CARTFn,P.E. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR MAI IAG!NG DIR_CTOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JAMES E.DIHR.P.Y. DEPARTMENT TEC 1PICALVIAECTOR KALAMAZOO,MICHIGAN D.R.WATSOV,P.E. FIRST VICE PnESIDENT VICTOR L.TAUGHER,P.E. P, H, Franzen BUILDING OFFICIAL Chief Deputy COUNTY OFALAMEDA P y HAfWARO,CALIPOHNIA State of Oregon SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT Department of Commerce JOHN J.MCKINNON Fire Marshal Division BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR 103 Labor and Industries TORRANCE,CALIFORNIA Building TREASURER Salem, Oregon 97310 W.F.FUREY,P.E. SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDING RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Franzen : JUNIOR PAST PRESIDENT RAY J.NOKES This letter is in answer to your July 14 , 1977, Bull LOING OFFICIAL )NTYOFSANTA BARBARA written request and confirms our subsequent i :TA BARBARA,CALIFORNIA telephone conversation of July 25, 1977, concern- ing tha provisions of the 1976 Uniform Building DIRECTORS Code. Our responses are listed in the same order BILL P.HORN as the questions posE:d within your letter. CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR PIERCE TACOMA,WASHI COUNTY A mezzanine is defined as an intermediEte floor HERBERT W.MEYER placed in any story or room with :i furt,ier re- CODE CONSULTANT BLOOMINGTON,MINNESOTA striction that the total area of any Such EDWARD F.WINTER,P.E. mezzanine floor, if exceeding 33-1/3 percent of BUILDING OFFICIAL the total floor area in the room or area shall CEDAR RAPIDS.IOWA r JOHNCANESTRO be considered as constituting an additional BUILDING OFFICIAL story. The proposed mezzanine within the upper HAYIVARD,CALIFORNIA floor unit would be considered as constituting ROBE PERIN ENENTU.,R,A. an additional story because, the mezzanine exceeds SUPERINTENDENT OF y CENTRALINSPECTION one-third of the floor area of the room within WICHITA,KANSAS which the mezzanine is located. The mezzanine HERBERT W.STREET c111FFBUILDING INSPECTOR is a floor above the second story which would LIVERMORE,CALIFORNIA necessitate two exits being provided in accordance W.F.FUREY,P.E. with therovisions of Section 3302 a SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDING P RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA DAVE SCOTT,P.E. The maximum allowable mezzanine floor area would RECTON DE AIRTMENTOF be computed based upon each unit within which BUILDING TEMP ,ARIZOA the mezzanine is located. TEMPE,ARIZONA l !.STBR E PAIGE,JP. RUILDINGOFF ICIAL The approval of mezzanines with floor areas ex- FOR TWORTH,TEKAS ceeding one.-third of the room or area within they Ftf—iona10Ific s: 611.",IN W. I uwcr Drive 0 Kansas City,Mi«ouri 641 r�1 • 1116 741-2241 are located, would be dependent upon many factors and should be based upon minimum equivalency for fire and life safety . In this particular case, the Code would require that the. upper bedroom area. be considered as the third floor even though not separated from the second floor area. We trust we have answered your questions satisfactorily. If we may be of further ass:.stance , please do not hesi- tate to contact us . I `sincerely , i;, n S. Traw, P.E, Civil Engineer, Codes JST: ev Participants in Meeting at Canterbury Woods, July 19, 1979 Pat Franzen, Chief Deputy Fire Marshal, State of Oregon Ray Johnson, Plans Exami^ ?r, State of Oregon --qWilbert Russell, Tualati.i Rural FPD Ed Walden, City of Tigard, Chief Building Inspector Aldie Howard, City of Tigard, Planning Director Peter B. Hoffman, Builder and Owner II Norman G. Hotz Joe Van Lom, Architect Rudy Klucar, Architect Ronald Melott Fred Anderson John Schwabe James Pomajevich TIGARD DESIGY REVIEW i February 23, 1978 12420 SW Main St . y /U/ Tigard, Oregon U( SDR 50-77 Canterbury Woods Apartment Applicant : Peter Hoffman Request - Fur equest 'Fur site plan and architectural review of a 76 unit , multi- family housing project . Location : c `;i'I 109th Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2SI-TOAD, Tax Lot 8800) 'L ho �, i.to is bordered on the north and east by apartments and 109th Street on the south by a single family home and on the west by a vacant parcel. Site: Designation : The site ib zoned A-2 Planned Development and designated as a Transitory area from "Residential-Commercial" to "Urban Low Density Residential" in the Tigard Community Plan 1971 . Proposed Use: The applicant is proposing to build 76 multi-family units in accordance with the approved planned development . Site Description: The site is 7. 16 acres in size and slopes to the south with an approximately 40' grade change from the north property line to the south. Three quarters of the site is in climax growth fi.r. trees. Previous Action: 4 75 On November 8 , 1976, the 'Tigard City Coun-JI ap roved a G 76 unit planned development subject to the fol.l.ow.ing ion•'. ::i.ons : 1 . Th,,-.,t SW 109th Avenue be improved to City standards of 34 ' p j %,r-mF-nt %vidth cin n 501 rtvht-nt'-svnr f rrnn .its r!xi Ling ('111.1 po i n f• t l)r ollf"..lr the i n to rscrc.t ion w i t li tho �;u11 thrr l,y loop drive vnt.i rely on then applicant ' s property and a 2,5 ' right- or-way be provided along the rest of the parr.el 's -vest property line. The transir.ion from the 50 foot right-of- wc.y section to the 25 Coot right-of-wry section will occur or► the applic-ant 's property , thereby necessitating t!ie , „� dedication of a triangular shaped parcel (B on map) . I W 7 I Page 2 ' SDR 50-77 l 2. The areas along the loop drive not shown for parking spaces be signed to prohibit parking along that street . 3. A 15' wide easement for public sewers be established. 4. All sidewalk and trails terminate in wheelchair ramps. 5. Street lights to F.G.E. standards for Engineering Division approval. G. The trail shown in the northern half of the development. be 5' asphalt paths and the trail on the southe:•n portion be left natural with minimal improvements of crushed gravel of three to four inches of compacted bark. 7. A minimum of six picnic. tables be established within Che forested arcaa; design and location subject to approval by Planning Director. 8. Additional right-of-way to be acquired on southerly point of proposed improvement of 109th, in order to allow transition of road to connect with presently dedicated part of 109th to the south . Site Plan and Architectural Review: The applicant is proposing to ce .ist.ruct 9, two-story buildings around a circular loop road . Each building incorporates a landscaped court yard, garages and covered decks . The siding is specified as either stained cedar or light brawn aluminum. Since the main theme of the Planned Development was to blend the units into the natural. setting, cedar siding would be preferred. The major concern with the site, is that as many trees as pcssible be saved. Because of the dense growth, a tree survey is infeasible at this stage, however, after the grading of the loop road a tree survey should bu done in order to determine the exact location of parking spaces and buildings. Those trees which will be adjacent to con;.tr;.,ction ar,tivity should be examined by a certified tree surgeon for th,� necessary branch and root pruning, and treatment for changes in grade. A landscape plan has been suhmittcd for the northern portion of 1()t which is devoid or vee .: f c i r L i •�n . I ruicl� �<lpc� nro-c tc�i• i ;c l i.s ;;parcW nud riot irn con,pIiancIA! with th(, 1) 1tinnwd de✓c,lopmr,rit. pr•cqrram which rs•,. proposed "Those are,Ls ninth of the tree 1 i,rc, wi 11 be planted with deciduous trees of various heights and types to harmonize with existing landscaping . . . Each building wilt be adequately planted with low shrubs , i .e . , avalias , rhododendrons , etc. " � r r 'e Page 3 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW SDR 50-77 / Therefore a revised landscape pian and irrigation g plan :for the portion north of the tree line . fulfilling this portion of the Planned Development program should be received prior t, issuance of a building permit, . Details for dumpster screens, mailboxes , and picnic areae should also be included in this submission . A landscape pian for the area south of the tree line should be receivec before issuance of occupancy permits. The reasoning behind this deviation from normal procedure is that a better plan can be designed after the buildings are in place since tt will coincide with vegetation loss due to construction activity . The site plan also specifies a large number of trees to be removed around the reervattion building and lawn iIIS t.KLtled in their place. According to the adopted Planned Development program "Areas within the tree line will be left as much as possible in their natural state . . . preserve the major grouping of tall fir trees" . Therefore the trees should be retained in this area and the cleared portion of the site used for activities that require lawn. According to the Tigard Police Department the proposed project is in one of higher crime areas of the City . Since the Planned Development incorporates a trail system through heavily wooded ' areas it was their concern that some type of lighting be provided at poin+ 3 along the trail and near the picnic areas. Therefore the play s►:ould be reviser] to include decorative vandal-resistant lights in the appropriate locations . Code requirements for parking have been fulfilled , however it is staff 's experience that overflow parking for guests should be provided when possible. It is appropriate for this development in particular since double p4rking in the loop road could cause a great deal of congestion . Therefore additional parking should be added where possible along the northern property line. No drainage or grading; plan has been submitted. 'These should be submitted for Planning and Building Departments approvpl and should he oriented so Zs to have a mi.nimutn impact on the site. Ntaff Recommendation : S hn l f as :;uhIn i ttc•cl wi t h t'o I l nw i ntti c ondi t tons : � I . Exterior siding lie Cf?du.r with natural stain . P . The following steps be followed in construction of the Planned Development. : Page 4 SDR 50-77 a. Grading and drainage plan be submitted for planning and building department approv,al prior to issuance of a grading permit for the loop road. b. After grading of the loop road a tree survey be done and staff and the applicant determine the need for minor shiftin- of the units and exact location of the parking stalls. (prior to issuance of building permit) . c. A tree surgeon wJth suitable qualifications , to determine what work will be necessary to insure the survival of trees whish will be affected by construction . (Prior to issuance of building; permit) . d. Landscape and irrigation plan for the area north of the tree line, details .for dump:ster,; , mailboxes and picnic areas be submitted prior to 19�tarn ��„�,�,.�,/ e. Site plan be revised to include L orat�ve a d vandal resistant lighting; along; the trail. system and in the pic-,lic areas. f. Landscape plan for the area south of the tree line be received prior to issuance of occupancy permits . i 3. As per pity Council condition 1 & 8, construction documents, street dedication compliance and performance bonds be submitter'. for engineering department approval prior to issuance of a building permit . i Il- h,]tr zd t�- .glen , Planning I)irc.c-to r a-V f Jul; 14, 1977 a Mr. Tom Briggs International Conference of Building Officials 5360 South Workman Mill Road Whittier. CA 90601 Dear Tom: I havo enclosed with this letter some plans of th' facility I discussed with you today. As you will note, there al" three- iveis of residential occupancy. 1. Is the bedroom served by the spiral stair within the intent of a mezzanine? 2. Would you consider each apartment unit or the area between the separation walls in daterminJng floor areas in computing the 1,/3 require- ment of mezzanines 3. If in your computations the mezzanine was Just over the 1/3 allowable , area, how would you look at additional compensatory factors such as exterior ladder, open area detection systems, or partial automatic sprinklers as a trade off? 4. If the upper bedroom area is not a mezzanine, would youddr;ess this as the third floor(lthough not separated from tha second floor? Please contact me -is soon as possible. Very truly Your,, e_) CLYDE W. CENTERS State Fire Marshal P. H. Franzen Chief Deputy CWC:PIW:Jc cc: Plans Reviaw James AN. Jamison OF CANTERBURY WOODS Building Type 5-N 5= Wood Type; N=W/no fire rating on walls Definitions: Uniform Building Code - 1976 Edition Floor Area: is ::he area included wittin the surrounding exterior walls of a building or portion the-:eof, exclusive of vent shafts and courts. The floor area of a building, or portion thereof, not provided with surrounding exte-ior walls shall be the usable area under the Lor. i7011tal projection of the roof or floor above. Height of Building: is the vertiL�.:al distance above "Grade" as defined herein to the highest point of t'ie coping o.� a flat roof of to the deck line of a mansard roof or to the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped r4ocf . Thn measurement may be taken from the highest adjoining sidewalk or qround stlriace within a 5-foot horizontal distance of the exterior wall ;,r the building, when such sidewalk or ground surface is not more than 10 feet above grade. The height of a stepped or terraced building is the ma:cimum height of any segment of the building . Mezzanine: or mezzanine floor is an intermediate floor placed in any story or room. When the total area of any such "Mezzanine Floor" exceeds 33-1/3 percent of the total floor area in that room, it shall be considered as constituting an additional "Story. " The clear height above or below a "Mwzzanine Floor" construction shall be not less than 7 feet. Stogy: is that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor and the upper surface o.`. the floor next above, except that the topmost story shall be that portion of a building included between the upper surface of the topmost floor and the ceiling or roof above. If the finished f:i(�or level directly above a basement, cellar or unused under-floor space is more than 6 feet above grade as defined herein for more than 50 percent of the total perimeter or is more than 1.2 feet Pbo,7e grade as defined herein at any point, such basement, cellar or unused under-floor space shall. be considered as a story. �i� � • ,: /i3 tf p� � ,c-�•,�. �- S�. ,r,�'��r, www �r 3 Q Z;L�. 0 L i X �- s-� � a6a y �C, , 4p 40 aj i �,• �'�' 2" x ),X- - Gp y y I <� n f Sr /,o 4�0 /C4�, �9- r2.a w`w w w-1 W IW L � La' ut17 (e� /0 3`& -12 = i ! G Oon, S14Y >iZL��O�s s. f Ord • �� .>,A too u x i D �o a� s-d F � � 7, m� � � �� 5 2, bo• ��'..?�7 , e o i z- • P- a G Sr V C3 d C17�-SJ 7 X 5L 40 14 es � ws �w ■r aw i■r �r � a I _ � G9 el o j <{ e D- aJ�'� _z '�'}Q --- . .1�.__ . ____ _ __ � '� � rte• �,�,� r�T � S �� • � d c � "{J y ri l N A ,d ti ,r 10 �. _� , � t x'74■7 1 .�� g °' � �spr s � , � d C � �� t�Ayv' �� a� i • i I z lual IL- ta N � o° II i II �zj f -�414 �,. . 5 u1 tn r yl t I � •i �1 12a i i C` H J o L �, , ICL �o v i I I > 1, cr I SA It— cr Om t.. II