Loading...
SUMMERFIELD DRIVE STREET . .. -NSM...,T •av,, A ! f� H / < 0 *)4 19 , 1 O CU2VE DATA ' ,.;' • 17S4.'A/V O «RVE OATH 1 e3 yo•oo' >` !1 oc+• oo .- T= 42 9,14 8 ti= /y vy 739• 17 '1 _- `7 3 1973 Rc ,,Vrf • �?>~�o,rte ,, �'. �/. _. .__.-_._,._.. --- � `'-_._ � s � -y''�.t e CITY OF TIGARD ' le CC, 2, rc /85.02 ` ✓ �". \ T•C, I/9/1 33 T - CIRCULATION COPS` o �� n- CURVE L)ATA CURVE DASA / � �3. � a = It 123"z8 z0" c• 92 12' 9 . _ _ -- --- -- - __ _ 2 : 1001Gc // / �' ~r ALL. ,,pt.CES FAUST BE ENDORSED i �. Ta ►8G .001 �1,! j).' 215.539 s - a I B�rN s/oa SAME T = 224. 00 ! f PRIOK, FC. ; 6�f�J'VAL OF THESE PLANS s C h 17�. ISS �� �� s"ueB reA/Vs1rro/V 3437.30 � T"C. /83. 30 � _ . _ . .. .. a 1 o• ZZ/9's L 2 S. 504 c 1��r�► ill I ' 346. 864 / !► r, , r, prr. Hr - pnrE �N _ I sN Srlr�c EZJI7 . !)CPT. lj:7AL.TH 01 1 / \ f►"> ' C'T1 1lNIEi'rGti; ' Ft �''C� /it Y,(f7 /3 , �� ' S , b \ ZC r:w' wA�rF>7'' r' --Z 6''3 •� je W W OF8S.C7t A.i� � ' Z . ° re ► TGA. - i� .b �,.�,<<f u i y4Nf rE' �� 2Z l923 \ 1\ 1\`, L w' �� Qj1 > `'!� r!. N. NAT4J�R. �1�0 �� DATE ,(� - z C� Q x 1' V1 L i'`�I Q`� ' - /Y P. ti, i'+. • _�[. i lX'�^ �� { /• _ 'j 1 b NOTE. FU77./2F S%,eTS CGbt/A,IEGr/,vG F.C'C�/1 ry _ _ pL1,[,ar�_'_1�b_ I.�s_.�-5-_ W z ��''ti,�,,�`,�' 1/• i ! 21 �,b \:.! E NUR Ti4 AS S y0 W.t/ QU -He N.ihLS T£2 " i `c�' �V ti rAt ca ' ' d., - C a� - . `° ?, �.v W/L L QE .4�T i-�Po2ox /a tAo ! /.3>9o. "•"�`> - N� to a i j `� \ °oi e b �- ,- 3.52. cC) PC '� EXACT. LOCr9T/O•l/S \A1a(_ DE OETE/21�y/ U �'l/irt a Z- jry /�?� �9lZEAS Tb THE !l/o2 _r/y I92E DEVELCY�"O, VASE'//►y �'��L'G' APP~y T•C. /7g. 2 4 _—--- /" vP7 30 ld CIA '� % � �C I ASPM• COOC, 7 ��+� Y, (� r �.R •'��:' st25 Mi a .,� C►y, ,h'Ie�rer * • C, s 7.G1/7S•O/70.18Il fT- c �— / -- ¢"t7RN�A/70Lc /'.a(/E�l�Y/.vZ yp4rlc�- Clas ,y f �?l �M w� Ivrw 1• �owF� C� —�r ' f .moi � • �r.�. tr - �,� 1, �,N.. �C'`S ��1� NOTE; - - � °" ---- --__-----. _____. __. �- _ -` v � �i 5 ver"�uR 1 i1 r' W71 Q �Q° p �..- O~ 2 ��� (�"rx/�er/ Jt�11 //l s` v�. r;.r /88. . 0 = _ '4/►� <;s ` '- ! Sc/94 : //��= S-0 �o��k rY�/�iJG. S7R66-7- s�C7-/Dd/ _g R 2 +ZSIULETS ip - �� ti aCI.1 ►, '� COt):.T. 0V� / ft wile _----�-- r 1"! �'� GMP le' �,s�e✓' iFmo BYO ++.4p-4o N TG 17 6.+ Am 0 - _ _ 1 ' C-- •-- '._�� __•. - _ . ___ -__ _ __--_- -__ --.__. - _—.., _..- _. _../yam--- __ _. .r__. _ ..._ ._ __— —_ _._._- _ -__ —_- __ _.. _r- _._ �— _ -- —._.— 1 _— -- - - - EXIS7. w, X. ARIA vi 97 ------------ — WIN -- — --.. _ 7 ;i /pp — -- — — -- 79EW W - — -- ----- _ ! A SA A — o _ _ — _— -- .91 a 0 ad =--. - — �� — lr.l i 1L m - - - T _ __ _-- o0 -- -- _ - --- - -__ -- — ' Z — - _ -- - -- — - -- — -- — - — --- - -- — - — ----- — t 4 _ - -- - --- — _ - -Ir EPYO-1 _ n+0o /too 3*n0 roo 4x00 -- - -- - - - - — - — - — — io+O�a -7.J i�,rQD /5f S© Ilo+O !'7r OO ©v ^� 7, ~ SCALE " REFERENCE INFORMATION AND NOTES: DE., C /– VERTICCAL DATUM - U S G 4 C '�IJMMERFf ELD , , ,�- 1 �_ _ Ver-r . - �_ 0 TRACED SPINE ROAD • q) - JOB NO. ' ,,FFG -,cj �� 1-1 STREET IMPROVEMENTS uZz 1 IT E CHECKED SMff$IT i ,.NI:Ir F:M.Ity_pl•1/�4:YUH'r PLAN PROFILE ftEV. DlSCRIfRlON SUB. All". DATE ���� �� DATE � »+1,.� r,.��. e,�►nt a t.ttt•t_�t. �•rtercFrr REFER TO TRACING FOR LATEST REVISION �. Ra N mtt,.�,rt►. �►k►,;e►�►. n-s2:► 3 A S l I 1 l 1 C p t R G H ' ."-L)MME:.F'F 1:1=:1_[) DP J 4'E: -. - _-�—r __ -, _4 CITY OF. TIGARD '_— ...ghrYeMRrMM"�It4M� yw,;. : „•,I,.. c.��w ,,.L+r+Ah1�Pr.nx,M14•!re+ V.w,...uFr , -• -•, ..4r"'., � �1- " _ f _... ._..a!_ 1iF-�..a9r, dpi✓ ,rrt �r � • rJ � . ... ' M .,: j►i.,:1.,_P►8..'.'AL1!'. ., "j; __....__ 'i_ .. -.�'(�': ,_ - tM�'-=a"�'^ - _--- -.'71A'. ••a:\!4•t"' .r.7"�7AYA'M1a4, :+,,;w:«.:,F,i_ a w.in.•n.. - _ _ �IIII{ Itlltfl l'lllll� Illllll FII '1tr 111 111 1tl 1II I�f i1i~tijl 11 11 I1I Ill Ij1 Ill Il ill ISI III Ill ISI III Ill Itl IIi Itl •l.11,.11l Ill 111 I 1 1 1t1 rtl Itl ill 1 1 It1 111 111 ! �• N . I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I ( I J I I I I I Iflt � I I I ItI I I , NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED I 2 -- `3 - 4 _______ 5 6 7 - 8 9 10 11 12 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE; IT IS DUE TO THF QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL ► DRAWING. OE 62 132 LZ 92 SZ bZ 12 ZZ 12 OZ 61 91 LI 91 GI b I E 1 7,1 11 01 6 9 L 9 S b E Z 1"■1'" �' I I I I � I � I I I I l ► i ,t11I111111111 lnlllul In1�1111 �Iululllinll1u1l1nllllu 11111nf1 will!!! ►►1111111 IIIII1111 n11111ullulluli lnlliul !IIl�IIilI1111111111111111111 1UIIIIIIIIIII�Ii11II1I111111IIIIlIIIIlIII11Igf1I11I1.�ililllulllulllnl1111IIIIlI1111I111111111I1111IIIIlI1�lIllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIWIll11 JULY 6 1992 z r G H . v ' ... A � '1I _ l�.„t IRON BARS- 2"o.c, u' ? 1 /Y! >�l PLAN �s. /S 16+v&.35' pG �,,oC 41,1( �j 1Q`J� ` cults .• �� •' .� R B' ° �' " 4"Cone• Tilt y . 4 Z C I r�� " � i CURB , Y• ` - r I h3 S �M 2 '' 300, 00 G � l G I ' > >� „ r P weep ordM - ` o c , 3 f L— S' $ rc T 3� Toy 4�� ?I"�il� ' i ( 9, a' �► r ""' \ !( C \ = 'T G.. 9 3 4 Y� ;, I A ° . • NOTE" Ila"oonc, Buri L : 7 -7. 1 4 6 rhos. 000 ewhon at ri dpplirt oye /o j and *utlor Nation• /♦ • • 2-1/8"hat)a it :ice' NIW"ft c A no/o\, 17 i Angle Iron ��• 'oil l�jtion L .. a ; ; Locatio 1 '1 L ��� � SECTION A-A SREMON 8-8 T./ S9 V- a -I e s9 o NDARD C , K ta,,� ►r. ,1 'L Y Pr I-� ML O 2; 2 5z ' x WOW o z 3 .� 5 a Luz ��.�-..� �-, Ck =G3, T2C) z cT�..S o 34 t 91.39 f*C CE yon S 293 201) x$ T. C,2/� 74; vZi3.'io""c C` 6 x 2 s u� � - c!'``- 900 "F� CA E0+9 SM4 L&�_ TC* 72.31 PT` l o 32:66,3 /•(/tens of o E �`i �T '�..� _ �� 06.E4 Z/ Z . 4/ �eY��,f- Gr LL X x. � Pyr �' �_ + z s� '"'"~--- 1 s 06.6s ar `rn 34 . 95.99 1 CSF pvF U Y. -� --- o tj � Q.B.' 1 " Z17. 5 -2 PEAU 1" - SO H021Z, tZ' IZ' oroo 3 o , . Q •V4ryea z.3 vTIN PZ0F" I, 10' VERT- --- „w l j rr _ r _----.— ---..__ _.—_ _ _"— __ _ _ ^/�' „ ./�I' fel, �j�.l�C��diC • V .��fii✓• •�Y-. �' ` 1� �' .. - - )1 '�. _ — — - - ___. — - f31' o�'� F'� I Ss 7_ 6ED 04.00 1 ,•,. — .-- _— .— _ ..__. — � 1111(( - �V - C/V - - 22 00 --- ..— --�- - .It - 15, momm - -- ---- - — -- - t — �i W __ _ _._ _ - - — .. _.. -- — _ ' r is Y — --- — —-- _-- —— _.__ —— --- —=�-- -- ---- `�- •� � 5 -- ''�' ,: Of Old �. �a — _ • . - _- - - --- -- - --- --- - — - _ __- -- - - -- -- - �w _ - -- -- — eL — — 00 7•/x)O �e�ov i9too �:'��©v /�00 22too 03 _ a_00 oo zStoo 26. 60 ?740,-, 2A 7-o�� ��� �- 30� 33too 34iOo 5Kk� REFERENCE INFORMATION AND NOTES: D� N Dr ''so veer. iz,VL-WTI CnL DATUM - USGrs �a S JMMERFIEL 0 RACCD SPINE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS s3 . CHECKED SHEET ORE �y * J 1 iA>KRIN - Ali INr.""N. " I Ltv A.[ �ocl.�•rtk;:� P)LAN#-8 PROFILE D10601IFT10N SU&. APR. DAT! 1{1M(t.PfMmsir•� N•'WV•I"1A DATE wsx►ti Nw. i�nyfA�t+;tr�'um,+�rk�ter REFER TO TRACING FOR LATEST REVISION SFS R. N m�� 1���" ���������~ ""67d'" A C D t !� Cr M - - - SUMMEFc:h• I E:L_D DF T VE i FIF• ..+ 1 .- r. - , _ _ « I 111 If1 111 11� IIl tll tll �I1 li�i�i 111 Ili IIT 111�(I 1 I i 111 t11 ll 111 11 ilt III I!I 111 111 111 tll 111 111 III III Ilt Ilt IlI llt tII ill III ILI tII III tII tlt ttI f� !��l l I � , I I I� I � I I � I I � 1 I I I ` I � I I I I , I ( I ) I ( I � I ( I I I I I � I I I • _. 0 MOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED ��.. ( 3 4 5 8 7 f3 8 IIO I I I? DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTIU. IT IS DUE TO - THF QUALITY OF THF ORIGINAL "'"bRAWING OE 62 62 t2 92 SZ 1Z EZ 22 IZ OZ 61 91 li—RI 51 b1 EI ZI i1 01 6 9 1 9 S IP E 2 1"•"" I I I I I I ! I I ll I ''''1 I ' .�" "�!11lI1111111 I"lllllll uulnH uUlnll 111lII111 Illllllu ullluu nulun �"nlllUllllllllllllllllllllllllllll�l IIIIlI111 }IIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIlllltilllllll11111�1iILIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIliI1�I�HH1Nllllllllllll tIIIIIII1111111111I111WI111�II1111111U1J1I11111111111111�IWIIIII + _ � i JULY 6 1. 992 � ra air a � �a.�� n ro-m �^ � April 14, 1981 Tualatin Development Company, Inc. 15300 SIJ 116th Avenue Tipard, OR 97223 Attn: Joe Leopold Re: Summerfield Drive ')ear Joe: In conducting the final inspection of Summerfiell Drive we noti..:d a section of sidewalk still missing between the re .rement center and the apartme^�* west of SW Highland Drive on the North side of Summerfield Drive. The walk needs to be installed before we can recommend to the City Council final acceptance of this project. Your irunediate attention to the matter will be appreciated. Yours truly, ' .. L. Thorippon 11nhlic Works Inspector 1t1,T:p j r 1 _. ..._._ .....""....�• '4t 7VL � s - ++m„:::;i .x.oa.i .r: ....,,a tia-,..x..a.n.::,w..rw.r.:.,�iir-iw«.:,..w'Mau&Ea.i:WiWi4WWtknu�a.iibw•.-•.. . .,- . l7bYNw'V�bAWkidlli�tlltlJ ' ('503) 639-3101 TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. 15300 S. W. 116th Avenue TIGARD. OREGON 97223 March 17, 1981 L� Mr. R. L. Thompson City of Tigard -� P.O. Box 23397 CITY Gr TiC Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Summerfield Plats Dear Bob: Tualatin Development Co., Inc. has completed the various items on the final inspection list sent. April 23, 1980 - Summerfield Plats 1,2,3,4,5,6 April 11, 1980 - Summerfield Drive We here by request that the Public Works Department 1nakc the necessary inspections and submit for Acceptance of these Summerfield Plats to the city Counsel for their approval at the Meeting March 23, 1981. Thank you for your cooperation, if you have any questions please call our office. Sincerely TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO. , INC. J opold L nd Development Supervisor Construction Division JL:jp 1 KM i April 11, 1930 Tualatin Development Company, ITc. 15300 SW 116th A�►enue Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Eldon Weichman Re: Summerfield Drive Dear Mr. Weichman: We have just finished making an inspection of the abo•re referenced project and founde th following, items which need to be completed end/or corrected before we can recommend (to the City Council) placement of yoir Project on the normal maintenance period. I. The sidewalks must be completed along SW Suaen,:!rfield Drive between Std Century Oak Drive and SW 93th Avenue or an agreement needs to be completed, between the home Owners Association and the City, for Public use of the asphalt paths through the golf course. 2. The sidewalk needs to be repaired,iti two (2) places, apprn-Kimately 70 feet east of SW Greensway on the north side of S',' Summerfield Drive. 3. The sidewalk needs to be repaired approximately 100 feet west of SW Creensway, on the north side of Si! Su!,u-ae.rlield Drive. 4. The curb needs to be replaced at the wheelchair rasp at the north- west corner of the intersection of S'? SunuierfieLl t'rive and S'.1 Greenleaf Terrace. 5. The spring needs to he piped into the otorm newer ncro4s from the rec- reation hall on the north side of SW Sumi-ierfield ;give. 6. The curb(s) need to be replaced (in neveral pinces)across fro;n the recreation hall on the north side of SI,' Suiwierfiell 71rive. 7. Need to have a skin patch placed over the writer district patch on SW Summerfield Drive. B. SW Summerfield Drive needs to have all the soft spots and defective asphalt removed before placement of the one (1) inch overlay. f' i Page 2 Eldon Weichman April 11, 1980 9. Tb" three (3) driveways which were incorrectly poured still need to be replaced (by the retirement center). The contractor_ has been informed of this situation. 10. The catch basin at the northeast tide of the intersection of SW Summer- field Drive and S14 Highland Drive needs to be r,naired. 11. 'Cite sidewalk needs to be completed (by retirement. center) on the north side of SW Summerfield Drive; meander it around the manholes. 12. The sidewalk needs to be repaired west of. fteadowlark Lane by the apartments. 13. The driveway apron at Meadowlark Lane needs to be replaced, on the south side of S4, Sunrnerfield Drive. 14. All streets need to be cleaned. 15. The sidewalk is settling by the fire hydrant near Mendcnrlark Lane on the south side of Summerfield Drive. 16. The raindrain(s) and curb needs to be rebuilt east of. Meadowlark Lane, on the south side of SW Summerfield Drive. 17. The si.dewallc needs to be replaced near the entrance to the recreation hall on the south side of Sumreerfield Drive. 18. The sidewalk needs to be replaced across from Old �,rchard Place, on the south side of SW Summerfield Drive. 19. The curb needs to be replaced at t,e ee,r. entrance to Greenaway (Old Post Road) , on the south side of `14 ;ummerf.ield Drive. 20. The wheelchair ramp needs to Le replaced at the southeast aide of inter- section of Century Oak Drive and SW Summerfield Drive. 21. A maintenance bond needs to be submitted to the pity. After items #1, #9, #10, #11 and #21 (above) have beer) completed we can recommend that Vie project be placed on its one-year maintenance period. All rertaining items -may then be completed during that phase. Yours tritly, R. L. Thompson Public Works Lospector RI.Ttpir (�l�.C�.�. f'1���'L� t September 14, 1979 Tualatin Development Co., Inc. 15300 SU 116th Avenue Ping City Tigard, Oregon 97223 Attic: Par. Roy Brown Re: Summerfield Subdivision Dear Air. Drown: This is sent to inquire if your firm has scheduled installation of the required concrete sidewalks alone; Surmnerfield Drive between Sid 93th Avenue and SW Century Oak Drive. Further, it seems that completion of repairs of previously iterated deficiencies within the development, west of 98th Avenue, is dragging. Summerfield Plats 03, #4, #5, #6 and 'Summerfield Drive' have yet to be accepted by the City; such action is long overdue. Please inform us, in writin-, of your scheduling intentions H—reinregard. Yours truly, John 5. Hagman ,1s11/par Supt. Rngr. Division City of Tigard INSPECTION REQUEST for INSPECTION TIME: PERMIT NO. : DATE: r_ _ / ' _3/7� DATE ISSUED '--Z- OWNERS SSUED :!1_OWNERS NAME : ADDRESS:CONTRACTOR : TEST : Air ❑, Water❑ ► Visual ❑ Laboratory ❑ RESULT: Approved ❑ Disapproved C Pending [jtKETC H ,o e u.%^vtn ri."^ / J INSPECTOR DA E Attach supplemental test data bet et I October 26, 1977 Roy Br.-vn Tualatin Development Company 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City Tigard, Oregon 97223 References Summerfield Plat(s) #3, 4, 5, an _ era —Dr ve Dear Mr. Browns In response to a verbal request from your engineer, Mr. Jim Harris, an i inspection has been conducted of the public improvements in the aforesaid "projects". The following listings summarize deficient and/or incomplete items which need to be corrected to facilitate City acceptance. Yours truly, i John S. Hagman Supt. Engr. Div. /br Encl. I t October 26, 1977 I I Roy brown Tualatin Development Company Summerfield Plat !3 1. A concrete curb island and concrete valley drain nemda to be installed at the intersection of SW Old Crchard Place and SW Summerfield Drive, as pet the approved Plan. 2. A (P.C.E. Co.) streetlight layout needs to be submitted for City approval; the energy and maintenance fee deposit, therein- regard, needs to be made. 3. A one year maintenance bond (in the sum of $9,963.86) needs to be submitted or a letter stating taut it is T.D.C. 's desire to continue the existing performance bond, in lieu thereof, needs to be submitted. October 26, 1977 Roy Brown Tualatin Development Company Summerfield Plat d4 1. The sidewalk needs to be completed along the "S" curve on the north aide of I.W. Highland Drive. 2. Manhole OA-7-3 (note the approved plan) needs to be raised to ground level and grr-ited. S. Manhole 4B-2 needs to be grouted. 4. The curb line along Hibhland Drive needs to be sprayed to kill weeds between the curb and the pavement. nN S. An as-built drawing adendment needs to be submitted showing the change in the storm sewer on Highland Drive at street Station 7 + 52. 6. A. (P.G.E. Co.) streetlight layout needs to be submitted for City approvall the energy and maintenance fee deposit, thereinregard, needs to be made. 7. A one year maintenance bond (in the sum of $74,276.00) needs to be submitted or a letter otating that it is T.D.C. 's desire to continue the existing performance bond, in lieu thereof, needs to be submitted. October 26, 1977 Roy Brown Tualatin Development Company Suanerfield Plat 05 1. The defective curb at the wheelchair ramp at 10450 S.W. Greenleaf Terrace needs to be repaired. .2.---- Thegt-ewt-"rem*nt-tn fsout-of *everel-driveway, apren-dips Goads to-�.-g:tom �. ��.����f��'f►�%�. 3. The defective curb between 15690 and 15670 S.W. Greenleaf Court needs repair. 4. The dam^ged curb section at the N.W. end of the island radius on S.W. Greenleaf Terrace needs to be replaced. N I ` 5. The sidewall of the storm inlet at the iMursection of S.W. Greenleaf Court and S.W. GreensWay needs repair. 6. A (P.G.E. Co.) streetlight layout needs to be submitted for City ' approvals the energy and maintenance fee deposit, thersinregard, needs to be made. -3 A-one 4n--h close "C" -AiC:-everlay -nseds -plaeea►o9E-- Crf"P.Cir-dF'�� 6. A one year maintenance bond (in the sum of $60,689.00) needs to be submitted o• a letter stating that it is T.D.C.'s desire to continue the existing performance bond, in lieu thereof, needs to be submitted. 1` I October 26p 1977 Roy Brown Tualatin Development Company Summerfield Drive 1. MH A-7 needs to be raised and blended (with Class "C" A.C. hot mix) to ,match the street surface. 2. The "sprint" across from the Rec. Hall, on the north side of S.W. Summerfield Drive, needs to be piped into a catch basin. 3. The one inch class "C" asphaltic concrete overlay on Sua..nerfield Drive, from S.W. Highland Drive to Durham Road, needs to be placed. 4. The curb section, approximately 150 feet west of S.W. Highland Court, on the south side of Summerfield Drive needs repair. 5. The "temporary" mailbox clusters along Springwood Drive need to be r.emovedi City approved units need to be installed. 6. The pathway along Durham Road needs to be completed. 7. A five year maintenance bond (in the sum of $87,399.25) needs to be submitted or a letter statin_ that it is T.D.C. 's desire to continue the existing performance 'fond, in lieu thereof, needs to be submitted. f tD I I August 10, 1976 I C. Souther, I' resident Summerfield Civic association Clubhouse, Summerfield Drive Tigard, Oregcn 97223 Dear Mr. ;'-ou then s Thank you for your recent letter advising the City of some apharant needs relating to Summerfield Drive crosswalks and signing. Please be advised tlm t I have instructed the Public Works crew to paint the requested crosswalks and this should be accomplished within the next two weeks assuming we get the necessary 2 days of sunshine to dry the pavement. i In the matter of speed signs, normal City policy is to not sign 25 mph residential zones because 6tate Law requires that all residential streets be 25 mph. To sign such conditions would require speed signs on every street in Tigardq However, due to the atypical design of Jummerfield Drive, speed si6ns have been ordered to be emplaced. In-as-much as this is the busiest portion of the year, and we have to manufacture the sii;ns, these could take a l.`.ttlt, .lonl,-ar to be installed. As an aside, it is a pleasure to assist the Sunnerfivid area in these matters in light of the support Summmerfield has provided the City in the past. I trust this letter will bring you up to date and keep you advised of the status of your request. Very truly yours, Bruce P. Clark City Administrator. BPC:lw CC John Hagmen Henry Yohn, P.W. I June 17, 1976 Tualatin Development CotVany 15390 S.W. 116th Avenue K..ng City , Oregon 97223 Attut Xr. ;ioy 3rown Res Highlam. Drive (5j=;ierficld Subdivision) Lear fir. Bru%-ns :t has been brought to my attent.''.on that, due to the present ab3ance of a connecting public roadway bet.:een i.W. 109th Avenue and the west end of S.V. Highland Drive, a detrimental (and potentially hazardous) situation exists for citircai residing along Highland Drivel the primary concern being rapid emergency vehicle scee3s/egress ability. Therefore, in response to affected resident oncern3, I am reyuestin3 that priority consideration be given by Tualatin DEvelopmEnt Company to thorou,;hfare development of S.W. Highland Drive. As an alternate proposal, should it be impractical at this time for T.D.C. to schedule full public improvement of the "conncctin;g portion" of Highland Drive, I rrcomaend serious consideration be given to providini the affected residents with interim relief via estabiDstinent of a tennporary, open-round- the-clock, graded/graveled, erA rgEncy vehicle access/ezress right-of-way. Your response in this matter would be appreciated. Very truly, Bruce P. Clark City Administrator BI'Ceaw GCt l;r,,. Jack Shipman 10620 SW Highland Drive w f� March 23, 1976j l Helen Kurm-mar 1036.0 S.W. Century Oak Dkive Tigard, Otegon 97223 P Dear Mrs. Emxa,2r.: i Thank you for your letter of March S, 1976 resnrding the patl-naay along Dutham Road. Thi pathn4ay is st` ll the responsibility of thc developer as it was , rtquired as a ccnuitiou of approval of a portion of the subdivision. It � sho-Ad be noted thst completion of these twprovements is requlrc:d upon co'.!,pleti.nn of the public facility aspects of the subdivisicii and thnt the; developer has two years within which to finish. The City will assure that, prior to acceptance by the public, the pntlawny and all other public improvements are in good shape and comform to str.ndard public workv specifications. Inasmuch as this particulsr p-atbvay lies within Wahhi%ton County ril;ht-of-vay, I will also pass this information on to the County Public Works Ucpartancnt. Vary truly yours, `I f Bruce P. Clark City Administrator I BPCslw /� �ryVv✓ ' Avoid Verbal Messages v A-1 CITY OF TIGAI U J To: X//e-16, From Subject:_,14-7-7flc, F/2 Cate: C L"jai inC/z Al- 1iILI ," TIC103 7r � F /�SLf��-'i� r- ���1� 1417 6F-fir M MlkX -F AF t D l,) o l A ,� le 5 TSS U �' G�� � P I TIGARD CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AUGUST 19, 1974, 7:45 P.M. CHARLES F. TIGARD GRADE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION OFFICES 1 ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Floyd H. Bergmann; Councilmen John F Cook, J. Allan Paterson, Robert C. Moore; Fred Anderson, I al Counsel; Russel F. Austin, Building Official; Winslow C rooks, City Planner; Bruce P. Clark, City Administratory' oris Hartig, City Recorder; Nick Hiebert, Director of Publ>e"Servicea and Facilities and Donald L. Rea, Police Lieutenant. FLOOD PLAIN ORDINANCE �I/ Council and staff discussed final dr ! t of proposed ordinance and requested ordinance as presented be on next ouncil agenda. WATER DISTRICT FACILITIES EXPANSI, COMPi.AINT City Administrator gave w s atus report on the problem regarding the e?cpansion of the wat�Oistr.ct facilities and stated the Planning Commission did take zoning into- consideration when approving the site plan. The City must enforce Was ngton County zoning code as the area has not been rezoned to City zoningr ..— . 109th AVENUE STREET VACATION - SUMMERFIELD PROJECT SUM j City Administrator discussed v.1th Council the proposed street vacation by Washington County. Tualatin Development Corporation is in favor of the change and Director of Public Services and Facilities felt the request was in order. As this matter is being handled by Washington County .the item was discussed to keep T 6nuL�c�ill current on developments in the area. O'I'IiER BUSINESS - FANNO CREEK Council and staff discussed ways to expedite the clearilgalof Fanno Creek prior to the fall rains. Staff has contacted the lint ed Sewerage Agency and the contractor working on the sewer tntercepto the regarding the City's concern cif flooding problems during the winterloesson. Council will consider resolution at next regular meeting regarding a clearing problem. MEETING ADJOURNED - 8:1.5 P.M. O i i City Recorder I V A'I'TF.ST! Mayor WASHINGT ON COUNTY a ADMINISTRATION BUILDING— 150 N. FIRST AVENUE CATY OF TMARD / HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ^ I' 81 LL 'AASTERS,Chairman 0 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS Vle,GINIA DAGG N KFNNETH A MENG, Mrocfor RAY MILLER ROOM 701 ROD ROTH August 14, 1974 (503) 618-8886 BURTON C.WILSON,JR. City of Tigard P. 0. Box 23557 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Attention: Bruce Clark, Administrator Re. S.W. 109th Avenue C]csitic men. As you are aware, S. W. 109th Avenue is a 20 foot wide gravel county road on a 40 foot right-of-way running frau Durham lload north. The portion frau Durham Road to Nae-ve is in the City of Tigard and is in the vicinity of the Summerfield develop- ment. The developers of Summmerfie_d working witli your city have developed on paper a system of streets which would replace S. W. 109th through the development and, therefore, require its vacation. Accordingly, the developers of Summerfield awning the property on both sides of this segment of 109th petitioned the Board of County Cannissioners for the vacation of said .road. A public hearing was properly advertised and held on July 23, 1974. A group of citizens living north of Summerfield, outside of your city and utilizing 109th as access to Durham, appeared at the public hearing and seemed in doubt as to what was being proposed. The Board of Commissioners, therefore, con- tinued the hearing to August 13, 1974 to give staff an oppor'.:uni_ty to fully explain to these peolble the proposals. At the public hearing continuation on August 13th, four of these owners were rep- resented by an attorney and expressed continued concern. At the close of the hearing the Board of Commissioners adopted a staff recommendation concerning this matter. The board action was as follows: ri'he Washington County Board 'ammissioners agree to the vacation of S.W. 109t1i as ;.petitioned holding in abeyance final action on the vacation until the follr-Niing conditions have been met: 1. The road entrance into this area (S.W. Summerfield Blvd.) from Durham 13oad be reconstructed to provide a minin ml width of 20 feet between curbs. 2, n replacaw-nt road or system of roads acceptable to the Public Works Department from the north boundary of the Summerfield development to S.W. lhurliamm load has 1�een dedicated, accepted, L.onstructc a ar opened to travel. City of Tigard August 14, 1974 Page 2 Effectively, the action by the Board leaves S.W. logth open in its existing condi- tion until such time as the alternate street system is available for travel. Since your city is involved in accepting dedication, approving the plat, overseeing the construction, etc., I felt it desirable tl-►at you he appraised by the board action. After the conditions have leen met the board will take final action on the vacation. If you have any further questions on this matter please contact me. Yours ly, Ll Ken Meng Director of Public Works KM:js Attachment: Map cc: County Administrative officer Deputy Director of Public Works Tualatin Development, Inc. ;tt CIC 1 - --- o� Ii 4g O - - ,, ay N LLI N W = " 1 � 4 < tr 7 , m I 'v Z a a b I . i W 1.7 CL W y a I .. � � I r41sd - �� 91 i i 10. Hansen moved to acknowledge that the submission by Farmers is adequate with the exception of the five following items: o Statement of proposed deviation off` variances from standards of Title 17 ancJ-!C8, Tigard Municipal Code, a7�d justifiq i^n for such deviations or variances. J o Commitment to comply w•1'th the off-street park- ing standard as desaf'ibed in Section 18.60, Tigard Municipal � de. o Explanation of' Broome, Selig & Oringdulph and Partners ' Pay e as overseers of the architectural design aspect of the prcposed development. f o Simp statement of landscaping character re ted to density and configuration of plant ,reLerials and including a statement with respect /to the preservation of existing trees. o A positive statement of goals and objectives for the subject project. r 11. Barkhurst seconded and the motion passed by unanimous ---- vote of all the members present,.,, ­­,,.,,,_,,,_",,,_­ x 6.S' 6-72 (5ummerfi eld) w J - A request by Harris-McMonagle, engineer for the "Summer- field" development, to review a proposed street pattern and minor change in the "Summerfield" general development program. A. Staff Explanation i 1. Brooks explained that the Tualatin Development Corp. is requesting a minor change in -the Summerfield general development planning pro- gram which would allow a change in the street. l pattern. The street to be affected would b.? l 109th and the purpose is to provide a more cLr- cuitous route to S. W. Naeve Street and thereby Pacific Highway. This would thereby discourage traffic north through the project reaching Pacific Highway and would tend to keep through traffic on the designed collector street, Summerfield Drive. Minutes - PC - August 6, 1974 - page 4 B. Discussion 1. Bill McMonagle, the project engineer, was present to speak for the applicant and stated that the need was to discourage through traffic in this portion of the project. He also stated that Summerfield wishes to put homes along S. W. 109th rather th.r townhouses as originally approved. 2. Ball asked if Tualatin Development Corp. was then asking for a density transfer, that if this minor change were approved, would they then ask for a higher density in their apartment and j townhouse areas. i 3. Mr. McMonagle replied no, that the company was responding to a market demand for more single family than multi-family units and there was no intention of asking for a density trade-off. 4. Hansen moved to approve the minor change for re- aligning S. W. 109th and changing lots 234 through 258 from townhouse to single family. Barkhurst seconded and the motion passed by unanimous vote of those; members present. 6.3 Discussion - Street and Road PoXicq ""'" """'""^'"•^ ~• "'r~ A revised version of this policy report was reviewed by the City Cbi�ncil at their July 29, 1974, study session. At this meet'14,g the Council suggested review of certain aspects of the 'report and referred the document back to the Planning Comnh vion for further study. A. Staff Explanation's 1. Bolen presented t' revised version of the policy to the Planni Commission stating thal the City Council had iewed it and found it to be an adequate solut %e �eption o these decision making problems with the of some minor areas. These areas weN ascertaining the legality of the City placing aien on a rerson's property who was given subsidy for his portion of the L. I.D. and thebksis for granting subsidies to retired personit The Council felt that possibly other perso such as disabled should also be granted a suU dy for their share of L.I.D. projects �. Minutes - PC - August 6, 1974 - page 5 Avoid Verbal Messages A_1 CITY OF TIGARD To: ��-� /�1rr�'{'►� From Subject: _ �� �� til9f�C.lC — 1Y1tin1f .aclg(-.v bate:___ _L_! ;5-- 7 (/- `—�2Wf to T"}{. I DF C e SU m m le R F I ELD f{ fts e>f C- AJ f� 'f' c�V E N n`r' ��, M C,4u D l.- Z {}S o>!< S /XJSPE� Tr1TZ- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON STPEET DEVELOPMENT_ PROJECT (P.W, ) PROCEDURE CHECK LIST I. FILE INITIATED . . . . . „ . . . . . . . . . . , u/22 112 (I) Supplementary sheets attached . . . . . . . . II. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED STREET DEDLCATION (1) Pending Planning Commission action . . . (2) Approved tentatively by Commission (Variance-approved). III. SUBMISSION OF PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION PLANSa (1) Plan Check Come. . , 6 (a) Revisicns /11 r,r t.o � (b) Stamped, approved for construction (2) Utility Company plans received . . . . (3) Improvement cost estimate received . . . . . . . - IV, SUBMISSION OF STREET DEDICATION: (1) Review for conformance commenced 1116_ (a) Pevisions required returned to developer.„ 13 _ ( rr,��,�r�,y�c�bx 1 r,i Commi ss q� (2) R ClorQ�4`WTYh ail �ounty ^ / / ) „ „ , „ . j 11/26 X4f4� -44 V. EXECUTION OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS- (1) Contract documents drawn, (a) Street Dedication Crmpliance Agreement signed „ m 1126 ((b) g yed , . „ „ . . . „ „ QQ 1140 c) !! d . . . . . . . . . „ . „ S (2) Easements, _treet P.uac, -,btained . . . . . . . . ^ „ ❑ (3) Addresses Aesg(:.Ine�: 13 R5.��A (4) Fees 6 Deposits Pa,.d . . . . „ Receipt # „10111,__ „ 0 S ��6 4 (5) Permits 6 Licenses Acquired . Permit # „ . p �T "_1 (a) Approved construction plan issued . . . „ . , p r VI. COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Note Inspection sheets and construction. Inspection check list (attached) for progress. 0 VII, FINAL INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION „ . „ „ . . , , 13 (1) Pending correction of deficiencies . . . . . . . . G (2) Not acceptable, construction deficient . . „ . . U (3) All construction items acceptable . . . . . . . . 0 VIII. EXECUTION OF FINA:: PROJECT DOCUMENTS! (1) Maintenance Bond signed . . . . , . , , „ , 0 (2) As-built. drawing received . „ . � „ . . . , , . , . 0 (3) Final report to Council ensued „ . . „ . . „ . , , , 0 TX. CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS . „ „ ^ , 13 MAIN'I'ENANC F. BUND EXP'P£S FYI mini I� ' 0011011101 milli ' II tlUl I a I CITY 0 TIGARD DEVELOPMENT DEPOSIT FEE COMPUTATION SHEET ,rOJECT NAME ,____ ___ PROJECT N0. (1) PROJECT FEE (City ord. 68-46, Sec 10, Par d ); o)Total estimated improvemp- cost 8 b) Less son. sewer est cons st $ c Adjusted improvement cost $ i-M., ' . subtotal c) c) .015 X (aubtotal (2) SEWER FEE (U.S.A. res. 70-12, Sec.9, Par."B"): a)Sewer plan check fee 8 inspection fee , 1) 6 10.00 X Erin] (no. of lots) �) 2) 1100.00 min [� bl Permit fee d connection charge paid 0 c) Sewer district contract surcharge paid _ p (3) STREET LIGHTING FEE a) PG,E. lighting schedule no b) Mthly rate option no _ Itypeoflight 'omens type of pole oMMot1 (mthly rote) (no.of lights) _ _ m _.� X = (mthly rate) (no of lights) lyr. = 12 mth's (subtotal) 2yr : 24mth'e �(tubf— c—i X(no.of a�fhe)=.... . . . . . .... . . .. (4) SIGN FEE S (Item+netallatlon) (per sign) (no of sign) STOP _. X RESTRICT OCCUPANCY X STREET SI" $ —_X COMB STOP/ST NAME .—X X e $ NO PARKING X 2(, — X _ � X $ X — is i RECEIPT NO f)ATE PAID 'L—(0/­2± /J II .heck ay/ ' (. cash t_7 I ) Y GRAND TOTAL money order C] *Inset V sewer,strev, RLCEWED WASHINGTON COLI IN TY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING — 150 N. FIRST AVVNUE HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123 CITY nF TIGARn BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WILLIAM MASTERS, Chal.men DEPT. OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION VIRGINIA DAGG DONALD W. MAf')N, Director ELDON HOOT U„/Ut)/ 14 ROOM 105 ROD MOTH (503) 648.8741 �ul(71AkD WILSON,( ,I I y UF A—,1341—lylb 107 0 UPUT a,-o/ L V 1 BLUCK 2 lUU 01903 02373 4.. 79AC UUUE S�'L11" JiW SUMMLRF1ELU DRIVE *** PRIILLEDING YLAR CURRENT YEAR LAND 111 r 50 U IMPS TMUR Dear Property Owner: Whenever, the assessed valuation of a parcel of real property is increased more than$400 or five percent,whichever is greater,over the assessed valuation of the preceding year, Oregon Law (ORS 308.2801 provides that Notice of the increase be given. The assessed value of this account has been increased as follows: Preceding Year Current Year *** $ $ 1yr50U Oregon Law (ORS 308.232) provides for all real &personal property to be assessed at true cash or market value. If the current assessed value is believed to be in excess of actual market value,data or facts to support this contention may be pre- sented to the .appraisal Section, Roam 105, Administration Building, 150 N. ist St., Hillsboro, and a review of the value will be madr The closing date for making changes to the assessment roll by the Appraisal Section Is May 1st. If a review is desired,please contact us as early as possible, prior to this date to allow sufficient time for completion of the review. Please use the acr.Ount number iden- tifying the property. If you are dissatisfied with the review an appeal may be made to the Washington County Board of Equalization riot later than tl third Monday In May. Yours very trury, DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION Donald W. Mason, Director ` APPRAISAL SECTION Telephone: 648-8826 Dou Mor to Chief Ap: -aiser APR 035 11/73 p10 M WASHINGTOINT COUNTY ADMINIST9i%TION BUILDING -- 150 N. FIRST AVENUE 0*1664-: HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123 HOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Wn.LIAM MASTERS, Chairman DEPT OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION VIRc11NIA DAGG DONAI.D W MASON, Director ELDON HOOT U: /UU/ 14 ROOM 105 ROD ROTH (503) 6488741 URTON (L WILSON, JR. Cl T Y uF - A-e-1341-1915 168 UPU1 LU 1 13LUCK eji1UL) Ulyu3 U2374 `,.VIAL k,UUL 5f L1 I -)ri �>UMMLRF IELU URIVL *** PRLCEUI14U YI_AR CURRENT YEAR LAND 27t4Ua IMPS TMdR Deal Property Owner: Whenever, the assessed valuation of a parcel of real property is increased more than $400 or five percent,whichever is greater,over the assessed valuation of the preceding year, Oregon Law (ORS 308,280) provides that Notice of the increase be given. The awe ised value of this account has been increased as f0lovlts: Preceding Yea" Current Year **• $ $ 27►4UU Owgon Lav, (ORS 308.232) provides for all real &personal pte.rerty to be assessed at true cash or market value. M If th, cui,ent assessed value is believed to be in excess of actual market value,data or facts to support this contention may be pre- i;movd to the Appraisal Section, Room 105, Administration Building, 15U N. list St., Hillsboro, and r review of "ie value will be made Thr, r-Insrng date for making changes to the,assessment roll by the Appraisal Section is May 1st. If a review is oesired ,Tease contact w. as eat IV as possible, prior to this date to allow sufficient tfms for completion of the review. Please use the ecro.nt number idea t fylnq the property. If veli are d ss itisfied with the review an appeal may be made to the Washington County Board of Egtulizatlon not later than thr, thnd Mo-'day In May. Your;very truly, DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMEN f AND TAXATION Donald W. Mason, Director APPRAISAL SFCTION telephone 648-9826 L .nJ N. Mi , Chi, l,ppraiser Al R 035 11173 2= t 8B x Q h cn .i T F n LA 10 � a H a u ° 4 M l 0 r Y m o e m I� in Lor, W N ui L b° i _o Ox r7 u 1! Q O � n W • d J 1y J �o x p M W> ! Q M! ap p w u ,� O v~i�oe q •< Uo N (yu C 0 M M W O o" m ce F _ IMA a LL y�+ Q W M J CL W Q O 11.1 1 N O Cl lfl ~ ~ ,•-i 1—W \ V O J rf W N ♦ d�_ Co 0 O L1 tN'- a oQ 5 ? Q ri H W Vl Ln Ln W Q K h C.7 H Q1 fJ ^ m H U, f" ryl M 91 W Q1 � H H H 1 Z M 7 O V H J O Q N J N a 1 4 Z LL e p Q _ 0¢ r' W W } ^I 'fppi ON c IS o LaIX tz t, In C N V V O UF E tio EWO o o Q C p 1 _ -.2 .c WN CL u VtA N p E t _ °z_a O O c -Ua w° L ' n o °G3 4 MQ N P1 V V 0 5 Or �0 na 8: V) c W X W U M �Q it •� W O tam lJ Q • w L3 a m ~ O cd �q Y 0 00IA C7 w G R -- •L' o xs � a N O •�] J P 1 N y 0 O Ln V W � (� woo q M w 0 7 �I 0 0 A N r Q N > .. ro w p bw • .A " o Ln In ri LL o 0 . a ; H y- M � o w W n �. - - -- - ~ ri F-w N . d S p —— --- ci cc v d O M d •-1 ri win in In `a n ca �+a+� O V C r-1 r-I 0> N f"' In V w rn W r♦r♦ 2 IN t7 H rl M J O c( N tD W —� • 1 q 2 z ^ q UI d O O O Z 0 I F ^ �, 7 — _ -� aui :, W> a N • t d fl >�j j0. O a X V, to W V C 'O O F { Vl O p1 Y7Z 0 ' F 8 w 0 CLa m �O p t W ty • • U IA LL C E{P - 0 O W j n G a E rn� WO zp ` f viae N en a p {„-r �,,,,.r �r �� �,r t►r r _r L..r V .r �.L. 1 , A . � t "Ell • a, r c1 I I ' I I � IIII ,o � j I I � • r -rt a .'� _ t?� •� �' 11 ) 1 I �1 , I � I _9 N I 1 l 'a 1 t 1 r, CIO t , Ch1 1 ►�. aY kir mit I hhvLovE ME or .♦ �� ._ I 11 ti. { I TJ It a In r tU _ •J C' 1 11 r oIj t t 1)kf) I N/I N 1.1 1\11-1 WV 1`4 1J N A 1\1 I I V A('A N� 1(*D I CAI'C-.1) UN- OPEN10 PORHON Ut S.W, �i9TIA AVf.'NILI( 11 N THF (-' ! Y Of 1 1 f,41RD, WA )H ING rON ( GUNI Y 0 R E G 0 IV 8: 0-'j L ohl, Put.1 c, HParj ,,-jq City Admin.i--trator st.af;Pd applicaril. h.id ivqunsted Withdrawal or p�'Ljtiori from considerdt ,; Jll a thi:i timp. Public HnarLng r1osEld. (b) Motion by CouncLim.--in 1.ork to appro,,-. second9d by Councilman Mcore. Approved by unanimou:-: vots? of Council' . 13. TIGARD AREA COMPRI'HENSIVE. HICYCIL1 - P17DE51HIAN PATHWAY PLAN (a) Pre;•ent-itjxjfl W;.':-;, 17131J-1 -.iy Bpt�- --iecrF,tary of Bic,VrIs Jits, r-rquv-:AAng Council adopt re,3olution &upporting the comprehensive plan. Mrs. Bishop also requesti-d city amend municipal code to allow bicycles on i,,xieting s.jrJewalks. Mayor Bergmann r;-,qUPBt;?d item te Put on Council study session agendz; FL.rLher !.itudy. (-1 5-U-M-M-E-RF—IF1 §U—BDIV IS ION 4" Appeal of Plann i i iq Commission action relating taideiixqlks George Marshall . representing Tualatiii Development Company, reque9ttid propospil sideualk.,.i as indicated on nastp,r plan on Summqrfield Drive be roduue-d from BI ,idewalks to 51 Ridewalks on both - idwq, as the regi- dents in the dp%inloprignt. dirt riot, use Lhe bicyclF*- ilr,dr39trign pathwqv --ir nritir-iret.ed. 11' r:ounr.il uri-ild Page 4 - COUNCIL MINWLS 1 1 9 %4 agrpp to the redur.t.ion in t.hp wrdt.h of the 5!d,?1jaJ.k ; lualat:i.n DRvplopmpnt, Company cro;tld nxtAnd on S�W� Derham, from Par,ific Highw,y to . S„W. '18th, a bikpr,�ay t (. hrj cclmpletFd pr.i.or to the h-ginning of �;rhnnl in 1.974” ThLAppro dsign would be of s.i.mi.lar design and ;t.yle a;, t:hp .ng pathw:.iy Aa;.It of 9,W, 98th, Mr. Mar,-hal.1 rt?- WaFhi.i!gton Count, ; r con4:Jde•ring paying up to I f thy- rc'jt: ar t;ha - 1111along S-W. Durham. Jtry Council m---_ _� _. �.SCI L ... p�o G O 8 ei.lk;3 on S prfiA d D`rivA sn,j the 5 ° h i kPway c� am; "Pr. ,�r!dc d by t n'u'-n �ilman Nor ton. ed t_Y u—ti`rlri�l vrjt,q cf Counc•.il. 15„ ZONE CHANrt: ADPL TCA T tON-f.,i ty r3f' Tigard A request by the City of Tigard to change Pxi:jting County zonino within thr- npwl.y annexed "Oerry Dell." area to rorresponding rit.y zone; City ProPOsP`+ to change County RU-4 (ol.d R-•759 Urban Reei.dent•ial Dircrict to Cit � R-7, Single Family Rpsi.dential.; County RU-20 (old A-23 , Urban Residential District. to City A-2, Mult.i.- F•am.ily Residential Di.ytric:t and County 8 -2 C--,3) Commun.i.tT Retail Commer-cigl Oiatrir. t ,and Cor_tnf y 8-4 (old C-2, General Ex t•pneive CommPi r is l Di.:a t r i t to City C- �; General Cc;r°aiercia.l zoning, The . ub jer t area comprises 69.87 acres and i;:, located on the northwestern side of S.W. Pat;.ific., Hlghw4y bPt,�,!gran S.W. park Strept; and S.W. GaardF. 5t rept^ (8) Setting r.,; PrJt�l .ic Hr arl.ng 8e0t1 ri.M. Murch 25, 1974. (b) rlo}.:;.ori t� : t E.IJbiir haartt'rc1 l'oun : ' 7T . , ry,. ire, ::. _,,nr+e�J by C0Lnr'i1 - ;n Norton'. Approved by tinani.mous vote of Council. 16, ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION City Of 1igard A request by thr, City of Tigard to rhangF existing County zonino within the newl.y a!;nexed Rolling Hills erRa to corrpsponOinq city zones. City prrpos9s to change County RU-4, Urhan Reaidnnf. tal Dist.rir,t to City R-7 Single Family RA-itient.ial and County MA-1 (old M--4� . Limited ManuFar. tcirinq- Prodi.ict,io!i Di;�tr �r ►. to City E-P, Comm-t r.i a l Prof'•• ;:,i ona 1. zoning, Thp .yub,jFct area rnmprLse- hl . arse:-; .and is located on both ,ides Of S.W 72nd Aventlr hpt°,;.:t.•1 ;�W, Httn�ilnr .Sf rcpf and 5.W- Sa►ldburg 'ir ron► - (a ) SptA Ing of pr.Jt-, 1 Ii lir?ertng 8 ,. 00 p.M. "I,trc 1, 1974 (b) Mnt ir'rl f r't ( 'ihi li ter•>I ' rl Pd by '.t:•;rr i !t• •e M Ahprrivr-••.i t,V (a) Ronald Gillory rapresenting Stearns property object- ed to the street realignment and extension of S.W. 100th Avenue. Robert Leedy, Attorney representing est. 3 of Fred Schrier, stated ha would like to have an opportunity to study the proposal. Arthur Pruitt of S,W. Ash Street questioned Council regarding zoning under the NPO Plan. (b) Motion to adopt: Councilman Moore; Seconded by Council man Norton. Appruved by unanimous vote of Council. 12. ORDINANCE No. 74- AN r',DINANry VACATING DEDICATED UN- �OPEPF'D PORTION OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE IN THF' I ITY OF TIGARD, WA:3HINGTON COUNTY, OREGON (a) 3;00 P.M. Pub.lir. Hearing City Administrator stated applicant, had requested withdrawal of pmt.itJon from consideration at this time. Public Hearing Closed. (b) "lotion by Councilman Cook to apprcivp request; seconded by Councilmen Moore. Approved by unanimous+ vote of Council. 13. TIGARD AREA COMPRFHENSIVC BICYCLE - PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY PLAN (a) Presentst.ion was made by Sc+th Bishop, secretary of Biryc.le Path!days Uommittge. Committee Is requesting Council adopt resolution supporting the comprehensive plan. Mrs. Bishop also requested city amend municipal code to allow bic•yrleo on gyisting sidewalks. Mayor Bergmann requested item be put on Council. study session agenda rr, furtP,sr study. 14. SUfiMERF IELUBDIVI5iI1Nq Appeal of Planning Commission ar.tion relating t. s.idewAlks (a) George Marshall, representing Tualatin Development Company, requested proposed sidewalks ds inHicated on master plan on Summqrfield Drive be reduced from 8' sidewalks to 5' sidewalks on both ,sides, as the resi- dents in the devpl .pment did not use the bi.cycia- pedestr.ien pefh6. v i, ant iripated. If c;ounril Mould Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTLS - March 11, 19'74 N agree to the reduction in the width of thy sidcjaIP Tualatin Development Company would extend on S.W. Durham, from Pacific. Highway to ,S.W. 98th, a bikeway to be completed prior to the beginning of school in 1.974. ' The design would be of similar design and style as the existing pathway east of S.W. 98th, Mr. Marshall re- ported Washington County is considering paying up to G J er half of the coat of the gi.dewalk along S.W. Durham. ,,jet (b) Motu t. �y Counc.il.man '.sok to accent the ro 5' s de—walks on Sr+mmerfield Drive and �.Tio�S bikeway or, SNIT rhTi;seconded by C— .ou'41man Norton. A proved b unanimou7 vote of Council. 15. ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Pity of Tigard A request by the City of Tigard to change exiting County zoning within the newly annexed "Derry Oell" area to corresponding city zone3. City proposes to change County RU-4 (old R-7 , U- ban Renidential District to Cit R-7, Single Family Residential; County RU-10 (old A-2�, Urban Residential District. to City A-2. Multi- Family Residential District and County 8-2 (old C-1), Communit Retail Commercial Clstrict and County 8-4 (old C-2� General. Extensive Commerrial Distrirt to City C-3, General Lcmmerr.i.al zoning, The eubjert, area comprises 89.97 a,,rps and is Located on the northwestern side of S,W. Pari.fic Highw4y between S.W. Park Street and S.W. Gaardr. Street, (a) Setting of Put. lir Hearing 8,00 P.M. March 75, 1.974. (b) Motion to set public hearing,; Coun..-ilmen Moore, gee onded by Councilman Norton. Approved by unanimous vote of Council.. 16. ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION - City of Tigard A request by the City of Tigard to change existing County zoning within the newly annexed Rolling Hills area to corresponding city zones. City proposes to change County RU-4, Urban R9gidnnt.1al District to City R-7 Single Family Residential and County MA-1 (old M-4S0 Limited Manufarturing-Production District. to 'Ity C-P, Commerr.i.al Profos,ional, zoning. The qubjract area comprises 61.7 acraF3 and 1.9 located on both sides of S.W. 72nd Avenue hat.woen S.W. Hunziker Street and S.W. Sandburg Strnet, (a) Setting of Publir Hearing 8,00 P.M. March 25, 1974 (b) Motion to set Fi+bl.ir.. haeringt Couiirilman f_ook= second- ed by Councilman Moore. Approved by unanimcua vote of Council. 17. ZONE CHANGE AnPtICATION - City of Tigard A change in zoning requested by the fi+v ­r TLgard For recently annexr-d prnperty on Pe if r+ Hio",vav (tax Map 151. Page 5 - I OUN' 11 PliN1111 S - Marr h 11 , 101,4 March 6, 1974 Mr. George Marshall Tualatin Development Co., Inc. 15300 S.W. 116th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Ajar George: As you know, we have been trying to clear up all loose ends pertinent to the Summerfield project; more specifically those p-)rtions, thereof, known as Summerfiald Drive, Summerfiel.i II and Summerfield III. Subsrquontly, to enable City issuance of approved construction plans, the following fees must be paid - to wits 1.) Summerfield Drive $2,621.78 Permit fee •+ 660.00 Sign fee _ $3,281.98 Total Due -�� 2.) Sumancrfield It $246.62 Permit fee + 230.00 Sign fee ' f� $476.6.: Total Due ~ %i 3.) Summerfield 1II $222.66 Permit fee + 115.10 Sign fee $337.66 Total Due All required sanitary sewer fees (arplicable to the above project portions) have previously baen paid. Very truly, Nick Hieb,!rt Director of Public Services b Facilities A'►:fj cc: iiarria-McMonagle Aanoc. , ix N8; LtJ ~ C) JCoLdc f LL F_ LAJ 11. Fes- ul H 10 LX W w O H WO n N o a c4 C1� a n o to a G m O W bA z w O ? d x O O M l() Qar a co r- 0F Q1 .J N ^� U ° O rI z z ,. o .. ul O 7u z w X > > W.. �y m O O h r A-IZ O re. M r" M W t Aom o o, c� J Cie o09 da u o X c� U) C 3 } M J •�� N h O W H LL N Lj W o CL o aU (4 : a a� - + rnWLn p J Ud 1 lY r i r•i UI X H • (� I r-1 ri l t H cm cn W J Z M J Jr :7 N r-1 y O �S N a n ~ 1 O b O z LL 7 .d. Q Q W ..0 N c .A K pp W T v7 r u 0 0 bQz O (npp�f"J ZX u O w - G U 'E �7 N y h J x o m LL d o O o W(� ,� d a In D Z Q o -0 0 Etmz Jw a app � tggd �. d : G; � Wu N rh a .5 ofo r ILI Z 8z N X Q a � h Q LL N h LN W 4 h Q J A w p F N a 0 ry SO M a JNH w UD N Oz x u.i 0a "' u_ Ln u 61 o < r z > z a u, D ry r v v~i w w N Cn !J W ULLc X. rte. azo rM. Q 0 oce w m uj J1 cr N A r ++ z O Y J1A x D ` U) N CL LA.rz ._i W a CL p M C n LljW LA — -+ -LL L' � J W N • CL p p'U C7 T(Y y Q rlrn WN u `= r-. C 7 P-41• U u1 u)LO 1 — • O w rl N LL y M F-• N C) rf 1 1 r r4w O d M 0 N t-4 > ♦ w u d N O z u • 1 P a < aCf. 4 a zfy 0 « LL Q Odd °'►- � o wi s c n o°dz za o E 't oz0 �Ct *X N M uw V O L)la V) 1j 0 O Q� O ` qj N 2 C p w LL VI O F n 0 > o Q 3 � CL u LU o — E _ ►- V 2)r z z p Q u w p VV 0� CL �0 -0 c d t uw aQ — N r%� < a ^ a O oc J Z tl 'v � f o as ZZ 8; f` V) rn W \ p M w Q cv 10 0 rl Da L O O u a O (� rLA .J m ..t 1-1 W �1 ~ = Q N ® O C %, 0. O a 0 c� ~ 5 0 ^� O w r W X U 0 0 h n w U _ =� M i u O f to a ► r- m Ci f Z (� n i W C] w . J 41 M Ld Q W O M V r1 F-�- � nun } .s r-I rn w Cd V7 (.7 Uij fV Nlt� Ir r-4r� T � � C:, n 7 j rl,v CV Z M ..7 W h :3 / M V-4 M -i , :) N P-4 O > O W n Q N U Z 4 0 ° 2 LL Z h N Q o Ow E _ Jl X W> O c � ' () tL El Y xH D Z 0 f'f W IL lu-J- 0 C W O -�VI h U to D > w Q O� ; v n ac 'E a ►- o c1 W W Z d o o _ E N ?04C :o K o 410 O a u Q O c v a N s v � o ti. �, : ` y I -- A T C ., . I T fr ? .. f + Fl"WeAL POSI T I OW TO ISE - COOST2UCT HEAOWAU- TO 1 Ij r4 11 DE i EQ^n���r✓'D ►3Y THE ►uT�RCEPT D2Al1.lAGE ___� I I L-a- I IE 230,E TI* 232 �� C- 06 fe. 10 TML F%ELO ` ( M �or lY1 1C 1 I49fo1 5f. T l ,� �;/ ��`e Tc 23 ? I !, r I �+ ' Z o W 10 E COW ST`(Z•U4T10 v �. 11 01 (o - 7, - LIMIT AC 2vsc GOLF couRSE rc ? 3. . 4 4 w�-_, .__ - ,� ` ' �,,b� 'jj �� �" A1f" WA ( = l . 1 ' // d,'/s /'P � � 45,, -Pw 34-�'_L-_ _ -,_--�'"� _ -----.'�'' ,_-� I %'.f*.f�ff : 2* 4 5,3 7 SLJ 9d�Ave "' • n` i r.��� /�,,I/we 0 TC 233, q� �-- --- -ao o(v 9 . .. 1111111''1'11111110`%t � � � 'A . - w M " "rcP PLl,►-;T 2 .3 i,8.:. -r 1 I •.I ._.... -, 1 .- 11 /'� �. ::� - ,�-- ��V, �• 4�. n 1 l o f r r r`y �' - �. 526 / C f I. . il "-�,' \ ,a, LL) I J U d1114 -( ti , ��e 111. 7S:�- ° 10- � tI S Sof u, 4 p t -.5 i I I11- :' 'ra1�'� r u r Ef�SfCT DN 44x.. Wit L.B-IA ` N /` r . G / IE 224.54 '� a x`�,�r, � big' rcJ I'� -ftw ,J $ 33 3y kvA0 Tc 2 =i 3/ �� T.C., 251.10 / /e c- �r� ,I _ /�, -t � I 656 4S/ 10 t� �( S ��, ^. , rj: r�i -I a 1 �1 ww 1 - le q?.�9 , 662 Jf°. 'trio ��1'" U '-k-11 ' . ' $� w �e .' 0 0 I 7�� Tp�'I w ... 11., .1 .. . I . I I _i " ,qo7 \d - 1-7 1 ' ' 1`� D5 0UD o0 D �,� � �; ' I t:¢ I t �' ` r C j a. WIC v,* 3+�+ SS,GB r Z'�9 �� ►CZzz9 qa \� - -'33'4 F� I I; . , ,4c 0�!4tP t it Gf, 1r� 1� c.. 4 s r, > aci TC 2 o� qQ .4 4- � . 1 , t: 1. . w � in �p �aJ� .' 5� T / !� _ •" A a<a 34 qt 39 PC o �L ���' �, 1' _� ' ' K' 6� �� C��' 1 �4 '/ 11 Y TC 2/ 7, 7� o, / .�'�' �� o * - Ny�� I > µ„ �s �"� y! fe 1, Vic; '0 * ChM t..B- _ 3 7� 4,rod F>. . /O1 �' '`�` �� �1 �� %fN t �� k'� f l rn� h'�` "cn I E 213.61 7 2 2. 7/ 4y, o i*170 1 I , It , }" 4 jr I �r i') e � . 11 0 46,2 Inc. 2 C N r ) I ���' ' - ¢9• 41 �. F`�� \ Io�✓,., r.1Gv // `,) Cl ��1.' 1I ;., rc� Sia-D 11 11 - ` i� t "..114 �a lvp ? 4 �, r � 1� 11 . ,efr� 1�r GR�4 ho3a'c '___. +o, O/97/ 1. .---------� �` r-� =s �� �•o t G ,r �, r1 i t �_ R1. � i 6.4 •�9 �.-J'cf/t --• f•'- - ___-_ __ ..-_ - 'Ql, Ga 4 I v ,rd t 1 t�, -- -- --- --`' - p ,`r �� _/'•"'' .� S -- 1 �- - -- M 5, 10 6 N r\8 � �' f .�� i -�.r.-- q 0' g 1. ' I h _- /��-�.r �� - - �0` ..3 I T.C' �ZZ per ­Rtit I iJ S Iv I� ,.�' � .� _p 07 mIU(t0- 1 E c!8. 0- Rr ►� r�- 1 �� I 11 y r c. 22.33V � .a /� Ci, ; 40-3,,481. ,S.+� - /� . -�(#4' � '� , fit'AV* 5C�4LE . l 'r. SU , I 1, t. . ---. _ ._ __ T - _ - - - _ ._ - I --... . - - _ __ __-- - - _ _ _ .. - - -- - - --- - -- _- - - - _._ -I ' I _. . .. . . --- '--- - . --- - - - , - - _ - 4t I- -- - *- ---.- '-- -...._ -. -- ----- _- - - -_. - --- - ---- -- - -- - - - - - _ --- - _ -- --- - _ ---- ------ - _--_ _- - . - -- --- - - - -- - - - _ -- - - - _� ^ik_ - - - . L __ - - - - - --- -- -- -'_.- ---- _ _ _ _ -_ - --- -- - - ___. _.__a_. _---__ _--_.-. .____ _.-. _r ­--------- I---.-----.----,.- -----------,----",------------ - y 1�1 11 ­-----­ ._-_.-- 1 - _ _ y " . .1 . ._._ _ ' ___ -_ •_-_ ---___• _ ___'__• -_ ---•----. -_ __ _,.. .­­--­.-- --- __- �/ __' - --- - - ------- _ __ . . - -- _._- .. _ - ---- .--.__..__ _ '-_ - _-' .-�._ ____ _..a. .. _ _ _r-_ -_ -.-- --__- _ __ --_ --_.._.._« ......-- -__.•.�_......._-..r_._ _-__ --___ _ _ r --- _- •_•-__- _-.._...•. - ir_ _ - tt- _ .-_ --'-^ - _ - _ -- - -- - - __ - -._� -_-_ _ ___ _.._ - ---- - --- - - - - - - -- -- -- - -._ - _- -r- -- __-- __ _ - . . - -- - _ 11 I ---I---- •--- V- -- _. _ _ _ ._. _--• _ _. _-_ - - _-_ -w. _.- -.- -'- __-. • - - - - _. -•--- -- -- _ - _ - - - - - -.._ _ r - .� ._- _.._. _ _._..-_- -_-_ .--­-----------. - -- - .._•1--- y __ _ -__ j --- __--__-­-_-----_ - ._. -- �-__.___ ___------_ _- __ _ ----- --_- - -._.-. --_ -- __ _ _-_ _ _ _,�..y.. _ ._ _._.__- .__ .._-.__ _____- -: -r._-- �.- _ __ _ 9 , _ 1. -_ __ _ __i _ I' _ ____ - ___ .- .. ._ __ -.._ __ ��y _ ..._.-_ _-- Z - --.--I---.----- __.�- - f'1I 11 - t . -AkZ .. _ ..--- ______ _..._ ­­--- _.-. __...- -.-�_•_ - - - --- . .-_._ ._..-. ___.-__. -_- - -._ ._ _ _- -_ .._ ___ _ __-__ _ _ _ - _ _ -_. -- __-_- - --- -' .-- __. ' - __-_ _ -_ - -- __ -•---- - ----.-. -_. -_.-_- . '- 7�� .- -. __ -_ -'_ - --F-­------a .. _-_ .. - ----- - ---- - --- -.....__. ...-._ .__. --r _ - - - �- - 11 -_ -__-_ -___ - _-_ __ _.__ ___ - -- -_ _- _ �- -_..-_.. _.. -.-- ---_ - - - - - -- - _ -- - - �--_ ---'- -- - - - - - -- _ _ _�_ -- - -_ --' - -- '' --- - - - -- --- - ---_ .-- - --- �� -- 1 -- - - -- --- _ - -- _ - - - - - - - _.. _ .__ -- --'--- -- __ - --'-- -- . -__ -- --'_ -- --_- h `_ ____ --- C. --- -- --.. __ - __-'__ - ' .- ' - --- -- -`- -__ - - a .'- .. ._ ---..- • , --;�- 1- 1 ai 9 1. - - dC - _ _- - - $ --- - - _.._ -. ._ _._ - - - - - - ---... -_. _ - - -- - - �Q� - - - -- - - -- - -- ­�­­- 7.­ ---.--------- _ , _ 100-2----1 . j N9 --. _ -' - -- - -- --- - - ..-.-- ---- -- - - _ -_ --..-. _ _ --- -- - - -'- - ft - - _._ - _-' - - -- '• - - _- __ -_ -- -- - -.._.1 - _- ..._. _ - --- - W r O S - - - ---- -- - _. -,ARNM _ -- _- - - _ _ - - _.. - - -- - - - - S;i WW - -_ - - - _ - - -- - -- _.__ _ x W - - - -- - --- -- --- - -- _ ---.. _ _ _ _ _ .11 % 9 ---#W-SL---a------­"-­­ _-__ .__-.-._.- - - _. f• i _ - ___ ._ _ ..-._- - _-••-_ --._r.._. -__. - - ---- - -- - __ -- - - -- _ - - --- - - - x - -- -- _ -------- --- - - - - -- - - - - _.. . _._ _ - --- _ --. u1 t- - - - -- - - ----- _..._ - - -- -� _ Wa :D �_... -- - - - ... _ _ -. - _ - I 3 l D - -- __ O a' _ - -- -- - - - - - - - - __ w_- T a - -__ --- - '-------- A 5� c.0 m __ - -_-__ _..--. _. _ .- -- ._.___ _ _._.__ _ _..-- -__.... ._-_ __._ .-._ _ - - - _ - - ---- - -- - --- -- -- -- - - Y -_ _ . - - - -- - -- - --- - __. _._ - - - - ----- .__ -- -'- - �. -- - _ �- - - - - - . ---- - - -� ---- - - - - -- --- ----- - -- __ &. _ _ -- -- - - - - -� _ -_.__. - _ - __-_- - _ _ -__ -- - _ E __ -'---f-- r-- _- - -- . - - _ - --- - - - - - - - _ --- _ __. - -- 1._ - - ----- .- _ - - -- - __ - _ _ f2d __._. ___ _ _ -- -- --- -- ..___ .. - -..- ---_ -• -- -- _ 0. _ _ _- --- - - - -- -- - . 11 I4 - __. - _ _ rt - _ - - _ - - - _ _ _ __. _. _ _ -- --- - @- _ - _u -- --- ------ -- _._ _. -_ - - _.- _._ -_ -_ - - -- -_ _ _ -- - - -- -- -- _______ __ -_. .__ -._ .-_ , -T�l - -..- _- - ------­---------- - - -.-I.--- I --------- -- -- _ __ _ - _.._-. -- - - . _ __ - - - _ - -- _ _ -- _ .. _� _ .-_ --- -- -- ---- - __- _ - _ - - _._ - __ _ - -- __ -`- ---- --�--- - _ _ ___ _ r9v - -_ -_ __ r _ _._. __ __ __ _ _._. _ - ---- --_ - _� ,,. ___ .- - _ _ _- -.__ - - • - I -.- -_ --__ -_. _ _.- __ �_ - - __- - -- -- 'e - --_ -- _ - - - ----- -- _. T -- - - -- --------­---------------­ _ _ __... _._-_ -- ----- _ - - - _____ - _ -__ - - - - - - - --- - - - i . T _ _-_ __ __ _ _.__. --- -- .---- - _ _ _ - --- ------ y�,.h, _-- - --- ..------- , -'--,--_._. - - --- --- ._-_._._.._ _�_.__ .__-_s.. --+..-- _-..._-L._ 1 -w._ ___-__.. i. --r - -- - - _ _..__� '..-­-------- .- - . __. __- .- _ _ - - 1.1 1 -_ - - -- -- - -- _- . --- - - _ _. - - . --- ---- -- --- - -- - _ - - _ _ - -- - - _--._. - . __ -- ' --- -- -__ - --- ---- "- - _ - ___- .. - - J t 340+Oo _ 3i�Cc7 + - _ _ - __ - - - - -- - - --- -- --- -- -� - - -•-- -- _ - ---- �._ - - - -- --- - 0 oaE;L - -- - --- -- - - --- - --- --- 00 41+00 42"00 4 3'4:0 44 x00 45+00 ♦ - 47rC0 48#00 - - • --- S«* ^ ;L REFERENCE INFORMATION AND NOTES: DESIGNL I VF-2TIC�L DATUM- U5G t S Op � UMMERFIELD s`�`� �4� p1Nf TRACED - I r, z , j SPINE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS '°B �°� r.� FC F �3 --s 01 °�._'"",�f Un w CHECKED j . ' SHM �-"- i4 REV. DESCRIMON SUB. APPR. DATE •"011 " •` I/�y _ ,4 All Itii�t . �•<1 ,�I�,m.,, til►i()�;i�,r>,•,�:I� PLAN 8& P R 0 F I LE i REFER TO TRACING FOR LATEST REVISION I f R, DATE KWin mow. (A) MW12l'1Ab INTRIIDWr ". .'' y r I p h, a 3 ; a' A -111 i e C ' I I I I Ir, +Kt�I�'- r ,. flf I ls'M'' 1' } f• 1. I �' • • -:M %L I {,"�' .. 1 ;0 1 .;,; .4.1. ..i k - ,.. w '�- Ir�''�. fir'. Z' • 4 -` Tww"I ` r► 1 - - ... �► Y ..; ISI'til'I'I�f��I'I�III���III�I�I�III�IiI'I 1��1�IIIIIIIII11 iIji III 1ITFII1Ifilllli li�III) IIIIIIIillilfIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIII)IIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIfIIji111111IrIIlIIIII,fIIlIl�1�I�Illllf & . , A ' -_- --..,..__.. _-_ .. . 16 NOTE : 11 THIS M ICROF I LMELt I 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 9 Ifo 11 12 1 DRAWING IS LESj CLEAR THAN -"r THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE. QUALITY Of THE ORIGINAL DRAWING, OE 6z fdz Lz 9Z Sz bz Ez 22 IZ 02 61 el LI 91 CAI bl EI 21 II 01 -61 9 L 9 S fo E- -z I"11". 6#11111 11111111111 III II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1411111111I111111fIuluUItliiliiilI IIttIIII1111U11111111111111111111111111111111II1I11111-I►IIIIHIIII111111f11111 III III Ulltlillllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllu1l111d11111unlllnllllll111llIIIIIIWllll1r1111l1Illlllllt111I11111l111111111l1W11111 - I July ( 1992 1 1 �g= 8: V, o LJ x W •r 0~t > w VD H Q w ri tJ w O CL �41 oz � G Y 0. V 10 O O H to ir co on w (.1 ri bn z W z .p O •- _ .J O q0 a -:rF- ti X = 4 NC-4 a. . J .o O o O u� ?� w v z z r-1 z 0 w 7 0: Q U Woo og V 0 z a. 7 M Wry c 0m >W N O LM Cie Q X Z _� W d J w O O r� a ?� x M J G4 p o < r w N r rn — Ln .-, H-u. a r-f v o —r_ J W N ♦ d.A- A O C.) C.) U cq 1. c: L:- d M Q rlr4WN a rr to in uW 1 — • O'p- a r-4 r, >w ^ f- rn ci IA) uj Trn r� rq r-4 ID Vri C) a N > I w i� U LZ 1 d m H d = Q D: H o VQ lQ0 ♦!W R '2 ,_n ♦ u °1 o v �r co 7a LL r') (n }' + C '~ 111 0 d W O w _� `vr Of B : Z 7 0 0 w 4. Q v n r = 4 .§ -o s > m a c o v r u w " Q v o a o _ " a Zz o c E ae wl O © O p a� = o 0 o O; ' vi wo C,4 a 5 =a n ae s o n"'e Sr z � o T 1 01- CZ 0`17 Vt r ti x '* n r-1 Q f� p1 r-I F- Q M � a � ZO w r LA a , O U. to co �j rJ 00 J �- J u) 0 Er ozUl 7 OM — h K a u, a J r{ Z > Z e u1 _._� t W Q O zO 0 + n w x "I Ce a utnQ WCL O H S O .i CG CJ ? ti Iw o n — > re _ MI. ui M CL p G i x u► G. li ri a ui f Q M J r x rn W Q >- o w ,L o J w N • d — cr G •2 � a 7 Q r-/ r-1 w to Q o: C7 ri 01 L7 in ll1 U '1 ) N ft r-1 r-4N >. M F- cel M J w 'n rn LL N R1 4 ,-q ►i 1 D r-1 U N1 .7 n .-J 0 Q N " ri U • I N Z Q O V a Z F p o Q LL 0 Ir p w w 7 r w c n,p to 0 a a � o of Z "� 7_a o v v c� u o Z = Q x LL -0 O in O 6�y� uj LL j 7 C � r E :3 rn o a OC,inO , 0 o n' o ° ac Etyo w u o w o 0 N w❑ -D v t •u —0 0 < as N P7 V I UJO O O OOC J2 -0 O CL 4( Q. r W o N > 1 in 1 LL w UX N CO -7 W W w > W F- > O H cll U � 0 \ 7 N C O a �j d v N J J f'I �y ca O IM bG Z z N ° D --- Q < 0 � o M _ X U r{ 01 J M V Z ZO r Zr O z Z 0 W r . r ux n00 V � .14 M M O ' a M N O o m C W M W V .- xx �uj i o- K Ln uj LL a o o c.' ~ --- ---- - r Mo J , u1 W Ql-- F- � H F-LL rJ Urid CL O -- ♦ U W z nUy� J N O-:� ai Q HcnW ,0 ;3 UW _0 N1,Uy H M V a N H a ? \ Q N 0 u 4 On s hd o< UK r �°,b tn ar tr ". c 0 O'Z ot S O w4 S O wZ 8 F • ��N ` < _ E°t` o V Ow Q x K p Q 0 pOa g to 13 O �' •v s' < mil q N PS Q ro f f 0 J< N v W T 't LL h C)R M Y ^ L �w N W 7o i t0 a N O a L n cr o �� � � m F J O h w x p� W (U a�A o -- ;4 m O N H O x = n a �: Q It) .e o O �( u z z N / f O W ` U ' zx oc LOPM F ^ r LLJ° oo � O •. �J W0 o W 00 r.. OA, 2 7 M LLp q IX N < p I Na w o M -J 'l " W ; < >- o W LL -4 v �W L i • d N p p u(A M Q rl Q1 W!/) J¢ ^ Hn p Ll 1 N ¢ .d'.4 w CT�J �I 1 Y y r1 W M A ~ ri M 7 N•-1 a O Q N > u I J 5 n Y x t W T 1 J �O c T c w 0 a v� F.U 3 S >L5 Y U0 Qu ' u Ol z E _ z o 00 t` el Iv S a v — f f o 1 N n 1; c� C Il N ^cm5 w 0 H N N a N t0 a C a U Oj O Z .1 I m tr) O x O Ln w Q Z o n N In O a J W r L u 0 d UM w O� J O O m iu f K 4 N > i N O G � W N a Lo J O LA '•�� r1) C) ` J W 1 cr v r o p O'U c7 •O r-i ri �+� M F^ N V P% N ri • Z ul O cc 4 1 0 Q LL F o Q O K � a E ° IZ ~ 94 w a w v u = o x N vN Z c wLL $ f1• a a W O s h '40 w Z < u — a E �- U Z O t1 0 P Cca °�3 uwio '� i ap 'W TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report Miscellaneous December 18, 1973 1 9. 1 Summerfield - Golf course maintenance bui.l.din and I re,=ico-, ; cons. era ion of Me development plan. Location ; Directly east of the current terminus of 5. W, Summerfield Drive at S. W. 98th Avenue; adjacent the 3rd tee. StafF Findings 1 . Conditions attached to the "Summerfield" Planned Develop- ment District, relating to the first phase apartment development are as follows: (1 ) Prior to the issuance of any building permit within the development, a site plan of the entire development setting Forth the site development standards shall be submitted to the Planning Commission. This plan shall include but not be limit,ad to landscaping, setbacks, building heights, signs, streets, proposed improvements, sidewalks, curbs.. gutters, parking, ^ervice and storage areas. ( 2) Each phase of the development shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. At the time of approval of each phase, the densities and uses shall be approved. 2. The staff supports the location and use proposed by the applicant. A need exists for this type of facility and the location is appropriate from the standpoint of access by vehicles and golfers. The structure is located 195 feet from S. W. 98th Avenue, a sufficient distance to prevent problems of traffic safety. 3. the site plan of the area surrounding the proposed structure has several limitations. °automobiles must back directly onto a public way to utilize the proposed parking. ')pedestrians mumt walk in the street to avoid parked automoLiles' Oe distance of 25 feet separates the proposed maintenance restroom structure from proposed townhouses to the east, a potential conflict of uses. 4. The proposed structure is located to prevent removal of an existing oak tree. 5. The landscaping proposed by the applicant is adequate and an asset to natural beauty of the surrounding community. p&K,3- 4-S '7f 6. The Commission has previously approved a dJ foot sidewalk and 8 foot bicycle path on S. W. Summerfield Drive west of S. W. 98th Avenue. The Commission should consider the extension of these facilities east of S. W. 98th Avenue, Staff Recommendations Tabling the applicant' s request for approval until January 18, 1974 so as to enable the applicant to submit a revised site plan that is sensitive to the limitations HQscribed . n findings 3 and the question raised by finding 6. The staff recommends the Planning Commission reaffirm the cept of a 5 _foot._.sidewalk and 8 fcot bicycle path adjacent Summerfield Drive as shown .ih exhibit "D" of the Planned Development District approval by the Tigard City Council. The staff further recommends the 8 foot bike path be placed on the south side of S. W. Summerfield Drive, the entire ray ength of S. W. Summerfield Drive. ��� \•,��� , 2 Con:3jdAraticn of 3 re uegt `�v Calvin United Pra�byt.erian �fL�LO CI^uT fr)rlr'?s �^ — / . LocAon: S. W. Canterbury Lare at S. W. Pacific Highway, Staff Firl&ngE 1. Section 1�` 6. 000 (4) 9 Tigard Municipal Co , states the follow.in D.irer,tional Signs, ireetional ss may be located at street intersectio s within 1 tone , after approval by the Planning Commiss uch signs shall be twelve inches by forty-two inch , oi.nted at one end, any painted colors, lette g or ign symbols. Not more then eight such si shall be p fitted at any one street intersect n. The 4ign shal a provided by the developer and rned over to the publi , orks department with a fee ten dollars per sign. The will erect the sign heights and location approved by a Planning Commiss n. Directional signs may be allowed f the Page 2 = pi staff report - 12-18-73 T i I f ' 4Jt v '�'•-'� M-.-.r, .al+.;�'- a �4`Yr.b y1' ./i'` T „ .�k� 0c+� l'�''"r"�r.-�I,r"5f, Y`*�'T.,�' -+ '�y'iliv► �?� _ -. 4 8183 „e�th,''Y r" •'i�t'' t '„ DEW OF DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRKSENTS, That s Joint vtnture: IUAI.ATIN DEVELOITIENT COMPANY, INC. and FRANKLIN SI.RVICE CURPORATION, both be- ing Oregon corporations, hereinafter called Grantors, for the sum of 01.00 and the benefits to be derived by Grantors hereunder, do hereby give, grant and dedicate to the CITY OF TIG/RD, OREGON, a perpetual right-of-wny and easement for public street, road and utility pur- poses. on, weer, across, under, along and within the real premises !, . described on the attached sheet headed "UESCRIPTIOM' and denoted EX- �Iss1 HIBIT "A" by this reference made a part hereof. As an essential part of this dedication and as an Inducement to the City of Til;ard to accept the some, Grantors, being the fee simple uwruts of all those certain lands abutting both sides of the area hereinabove dedicated, do fur uurselves, our successors and ae- �— •, — signs, sell, transfer, convey and relinquish unto the CITY OF TIGARD, �y%•. r- its successors and assigns forever, all existing, future and potential easements and rights of access and rights of ingress, egress and re- gress by motorized vehicles from and between all the real premises abutting both sides of said dedicated area and said dedicated arca, SAVE AND EtCLPT seers■ by motorized wheelchairs, and F.XCrrr1NG access from and to intersecting public streets and public roads, PROVIDED 41HOWEVER, right of access for ingress and egress, as may be determined s" ,- r `. • r •+- to be reasonable and necessary by the Cit;; . Tiglyd, between t.nid � ' �• •1 dedicated area and certain tracts used for rer_reatiun or with respect r4 to which no other means of eceose is available will be granted upon application to the City of Tigard, Oregon. It is expressly intend-d hereby that the foregoing restriction of access shall run with the land and be binding upon Grantors, their r successors and assigns forvver. To Rave and to Ilo'.d the above described and dedicated r1l,hCe unto the City of Tigard, its successors and assigns for the uses and purposes hereinabove stated. /7 554 . .�4o-3'M kT-i�9r r " rZ63-Q• C ��,.'�...'� 1., 1`•... .. �.,i,•.�Y.�"•Mw�,�a� , 1N'• �: .,,. .�,•1°+,.y,�.•.. .rl• �N1M• f .!l�'y1'Mre/ e,'•r.•t�. ,f \'. A•. �.I•i�:r�i ..1.y' 4 n 1 P��'41.,�j�•��.yy.-J �ti.�y� • � �'CI� - r y,. - ,. ,.?a.,.ae,'fr• •r:- -_�.;.... - tip.,••� �.1•,, .S- , r ,7�Vr.�.+f ay .a7;: '-'(tpF'w`'' ....�T"rl„""•�°`.`f �� •,.. . - '�s .. -'•r The grantor. bid h hereby covenant that they are the caner• in fee ` M� '!Cr+�•t•~rl simple have • good and legal right to grant the rightt abwa dr �' �� ';I ,r ..,t•r tri✓., Aaases�s�m.�mr.m�m IN WITNESS WNEtiEOF the undersigned corporations have caused this instrument to be executed by their re,,pec•tive dui undersigned officers, actin y authorised, B pursuant. to resolution of the!r respec- tive board of directors, this lhth day of Nov.mbar ---� 1473. +•``. �- - TUAI.ATIN Dr.VF].olA4,T L COM'ANt, INC. a.MA• +� ti+�7' ."• �dnme oo arporat oo q ' ',r�0'f rA.a.T'7 jrs w Y.(' t.� n •�1t ,`a.. ��-. re vn rrnavro by city of tlE.re, � at eton by City Councll se tlo• gyt-- /�-� November 26, 107x, ••��++ A � .,c rmc•ry ATTEST,3, 4•r��- '/'y��,-r clty miluttaket •�—s'"•�AM1KLIN 9FNVICF MRPOIATInN .. i .._�..... ....... Fame o orporst on i By:A / �ecr tory .•,.may " . ' M j ,A 10, yJiry � � .tit } r i r i 1 f Y. .. ,tit.:)yva�'�,'rr� '.�. "sl:.. S' �;:.,y'• .��.'��rw�„Y' �y, �. j 1113 LAW Ar �,MY Mr 1.-.r.MOwlr\.RMIMT-le.rn.L�OY •'..'.i�a_lL`[Pdl•••'•'• ' ISTATS OF OREOON, Conroy d NsehlnRt on r I 21th der N Reeeober ,10.) ROBA1:b!. SORAPS P ._ felon Iw.p _... .. ....._........._........��.... °'er�AACE IttB1NA1I. bale M n•tMrrar.uy•rY»n. 1a.wry pon�ld f:Sorensen .. - - _ duly worn,did wr fMt N,f1..Wf ..George is the rnlidrro,and hr, .. ( - af 'M11eletln Wr•iofaeht"C&.p�ryi't•Thh:""—• ... iI the Srd.f.ry .. ... ....._.�_.....__. fh.wlffun n.md Cerpmeflan end that IM rd all.ed lo.nd Imfrurl.rM II the r r-w.wd of said Corpure• lion,e•d fh.f the and butene rnt we+ujrwd end rd.d ro 1.1.41 of urld Coraunflo44by eullYrdty a It,Rmwd 4 Dlr.erml,and one ld B. Sor�n.en eAd Ofores Mernhell :1 .cArlowtdld wd Imtw"M to be'he free.A—1 d.d e1 mid Cerpor.Hnn. ,�• r IN rESTIMONY WIIERI}d iO/,I hnr.1--f..1 lay h—l.rd-01—dd - . l my yNiwd Ilw d.Y/nyrd y" bn d nhowriffe". / t��v1fy/�uhlle/nr Orrthrn. 1 �' llfY�orrlfalllm..dne .'11Y-74 0541,1:342 Z. i y�a..�Y"{,r�.•y.t��"•.41•�e?'1.'r).... y.�,i•:.y,` .. / , f`• -Ai ' �,ia 1 \r :. - r f♦ Y . '.� ` '. . r 1 r , t. r 1 V -- i hO y^3 , J;YF ," :/^ •lwnL..rir•ntora herby 1 r�•T••tt�_I�?'y"�.�. �A'A1�•'�'A.,�y,1{i°�r'�'�•f�r!~� (E�, fII ... .t.i'1' '' „v y.;..';••";f•i� rw AlSl�{;V~ �+� ri•,�d..JR.',°�.,.' J t • 'w„a`•ei•«�,,,y,/t r�^.t••�.- , r m r �y ro•a e•11 rrt\nM 1 SrAre OP OAACON, l 1 topers.0 M.Ltno'eh bl 1�• •,.1 .n nr•.Pr..rrd L0:'IS% ..SCN„SliZl�. On rN. 26 11 1 ,......... _..... ry fA.l Y r fd i LILA -..�.._..._...... s. Yo. � ./ dull.naq did sa ....., ^'Alar ,I% •• •» b fM Pnsidrnf• II LOate ScLerfer„__».........A.fA fo a*e•r on.11y Anon,who Awry ,1 A rM S..., fA•rWd Ken Lion _ uu nf/un n.m — r FlrerklLn,erUee� .._..__.... , non W rA.f rM n.nrfoe•.ne fLf IM wal Allis COrporeti. ... -'”-...•.." .- w d/rufrum.m..1 sin d fo lard rnrtrumrn/i,rho ..«•.•. d D,r.rrnn,.rd Louse $rr•Itjr•nd r.Al.d rn MA1I*1 r.rP.r.M 1,441 of mad cos .rAn.wlyded wd imfrvmrnf fo .� s.ldC.rf+.dlfonAy.yfAed,,dlf.a.or*- 4 rA."";;'And d«d.1 laid car Aon Ltan......... ' •',(1•, IN rESf/MONY IrN£RLO r.nfion. ........ P.I A...Ar.runr. v♦ •. . ml dlfci •Al fh• 1nY lu, Alli (.w, s 7�,• � • lrnllY.Ao)rNfN � � . . :' f ommfufon a N.r.rY PuAlfr/a n _ � ;.:.. — ..�. �` � vary ✓' xs'i. °''" O -.ansir4 ... ""' , I I - l 1a ♦�• 1 t S M \/1 • 8183 S. W. SUI.21 RFIFLDD DRIVE Si:LYCATION AVE1.•Url'TION FROM The rbilowing described tract of land commonly known as S. W. Summerfield Drive situated in the S. IN.Rllw �fMSe°C1ey of Tigard, ~1 and the S. E. 1/4 of Section 11, T-2S, _ �r•w .^ ° rr liaahington County, Oregon. I .t,�.;� !. .� Aoeinnino, at a point on the Sogth line of Section 10 and the center 1...,, line of 1. la. Purham Road C. R. #+129 N-890 521 07"-g 189.79' from tho quarter corner on the South line of Section 10. Said point being Station 0.00 of the following described 60.00' width ri6lht ollo/ of way 30.00' of each gside 0of tlileSta thence N-000 07 53 tioni0g85 00rPi•C�icenter thanc along Y the arc of a 100.00' radius curve to the right having a central t 171115'f(an3arc8' 2njkn011 eeeofh215.5C')rd of htohStation 3boars (00.501P17T.E thence 5-5c0 39' 33"-E 52.00' to Station 3 52.50 P.C.; thence along the ore of a 215.541 radius curve to the left having a central ontle of 92° 12' 19" the chord of which bears U-770 14' 18"-, 310.63' (an arc distance of '146.86') to Statins 6.99.36 P.T. ; thence .,,�.+ 5yr� h-31° 081 08"•. 327.86 to Station lU'27.22 P.C.; thence along the �,� .w.n.M e.• .,•. °1y •A'.M t•4 �`.�IKtN'•.+1 arc o a 580.00' radius curve to the right having • central anPtle 't•,t,,°. ,� .LS. '; of 73� 05' 54" the chord of which bears t1-67° 411 05"-E 690.79 (an are distance of 739.96') to Station 17.67.19 Ptheneethe alan; ''+ •` •" r'ywA„ -, �, 5-75° 45' S8"-E 131.16' to station 18.98.35 P.C.; to the lett 1levinl ► central the are of a 300.00' radius curve angle of 14 441 02" tho chord of which bears S-"_'O u7' 7c,o�+1 (ao ere distance of 77.14') to Static„ 19.75.49 P,T.; thence 11-84 30' 00"-r. 459.49' to Station 26.34.96 P.C.; thence cenmlntral a. the ogle f of g22,y00.Oh° chordradius ofcurve whicN brnro 1 81st,he left a33'g1'2"-En6»'51290 1 (an are. listance of 6 7.331) to Station 32'72.31 P.T.i thence i 7S0 371 21,"-E 219.09' to Station 34.91.39 P.C.1 tbenco along the a e458.001 radius curve to the richt having s centra nnrle of 206 »' 30" the chord of which bears N-h 3° 5" it"'E 163.42 (an arc dir,tonee of 164.291) to Station 36.55•Gd P•T.; thence S-85o 4g' 2G"-E 83.99' tc Station 37- 9.67 P.C.; thence alon0, the y'r`c+•, ',,- tirle arc of a 65G.051 radius curve to the s 11 having • central ■24' of 250 33' 34" the chord of which boars N-81° 23' 47"-E 290.24' (an are distance of 292.60) to Staliuthence aloong the n 40.32.33 P•T•; than 1,1- 371 00"-E 333.94' to Station 43.66.27 P,C.i LB jus of of 05° a 1,4rO'.the chord of whiclrve 1 redohcars 1F71° 22'n59°-E 140.02'ng1e (an arc 0 distance of 11, .071) to Station 45 06.34 P.T.; thence 205.02' to Station 47.11.36 P.C.; aCoothence along thetrol 811916- arc of a 684.29' radius curve to the right havinr a ' h of 16° 00' 13" the chord of which boars '1-82° 0" 07"-E 190.53' .. ^• (an are tit At of 191.151) to Station 49'02.5 P.T.i thence -89° 50' 44"-E 55.00 to Station 4-57.51 and the terminus of this descriptions aafd terminus beim on the canter line of S. N. .,'. 98th Avenue C.R. #2049 and tied t0 the quaater corner on th South line of Section 11 through the following courses and dietaneees 554 0 1.343 1 IJ•� ter_..-�._��.�.-.. -- .+.M-+•r -.,....rr 1. .r. • .w F• •..w.�J•• , , ♦,r r Aegirinln, at theabove said terminus; thence S-000 091 1611-p tolitsIntorcoction withetheiSouth line.OfBSectionuIIC. tilence8 along the South line of Section11 Y.-890 161 3011-E 66.621 to the quarter corner on the South line of Section 11. ♦. ?�:=•;.fir�,,, ... r.l*,"'NK 1��r�I/V�1�-,,I �. .. .. ba R► Iw ti.•Rw f. Ij S1A71 IX ONt404 cow,lr or w.d.,rrlrRr E r ,Iv" ' � .,,n u•.p�w, n,-rw., n,,.rR I j M vM G 04".�rtra a ra 1 !// r.enrN ardwa4d Nl ya.telM rR M - - ����� W,nrr Tr MN erd 1 .• a04 tromsrlr.r' *74 .'r�'•�r � (�r• r,r.�,r.. t 1 al..'C•� y`rl irlr..rMt��•(>•r-r�d� /r;,•MM 7.:�`S�rr«rl, 'd.,r;' ....•. -. , 1 . .♦ .. v '... .r , ..., �1 "�' . �..r'� 11.isi=M'�.r.••a,.*,�.1�,.,...1���,�it•N»''r�'. l' ��.Q .•...a�s�i.+�r �. .tis' C•a'�"!"p •a+E�►1 �'3r-a'---R�,T J - yg '� ,�## I � Cgw3 ac 9Y $l9a.Yp� afA1 MCY 1\�1���y 'p&•°y Aa �' ���t1t !� � � I � . .�p1 ��.•p14`y�1/1°MY nW Y$°1+$$CW�6�N N Y0."•iReYNUoYO nN ytl • 1. X0.0. Y� I� a ( ,yOa '� OO °! • {� ajI??ena:A q»�%If e��u wi � a$w•a�n al�a�'a� `�y \y •11�H0 gPyy/0 Y.1 �ppY�� 4 YY�1�4Y0 � O YYn•-� 1.�M yVY V�n .�100�q N�'Nwi � Gj� � �• ! a 7 A $:7:1�"••ynio.St•• YI•�j"1�'�n'f O•�Y1 Y1I�J4Jy) AAnW 4JJ°W• yY YM"y$yyyYy?OiW tlCOu1 pp��U.�,,fSS' � � � j�� I�• I 4eydy41 7aIU qOSU� ,• "�MM tlp N9 niNu y.•h !Y�MY\n. hy° F•"i�4 pY.nl•3 � tt� I Y5� IDSw6r` O�«y[w Yiu nGGG6 hn yy q 0.r n+M1' Lpp 0. nDDD4 6CLp 4x+1.1 ' i•1 Sy•' h.. yYy1)3Y�„e 41h1W 1y, .•.f •.4+. •.7M �.. •..1• •.\'. �rp 3Y!1�:M1r� � (1F h«-f yO OyJyY •Y YJ`Y!1�•U.:J.PiUL\p�HU�Mr�U l.]u wG Nin1.�1`1`N'•1U r°iD�uyl y■Y4 by��•y�a 'G � r�1��>!t i uD1' �NrYO+~!�4.0•�INIS rpQ•�/NBP. h1YM y4 O4 sO Inyd]O V?�1•°Nd YO f6R�9.11fYu0 VAN.J° . ...may YyyANMO�!�i!•�:nnlM•°i t1nVL\r 1 'nl lr3� �'l', 1•C J."gpa03ry1O�N . .,... 4✓JYy.I.1 M YP�" O�•A•U`��41.00�M++.Yi 4'f'�U I.0 L4$!l��°'u °r`e rpll i�'. Yl; by •� {� •. C •i `�u o:n•J �Y .iJ SN•ii�•� J°.~i^.N 'J�i��.K"5'' �ws NN!ItY I1� I ' 1. 1f�.`:Y`G�Y`°;i."Qr NM�e.:N$°$«:$.°..51i�c..:yin",•vai°3-:3$"•�Rnw°eyla!1e.°..n..�i K E���E nl w_. �.S 1, .sY YJ�°OYM" O•f 1°Y°w�.Y i°Y �4.Yi 0.1w HO wl e•'1. G G. , NN Y.1 �s.•..•« u"�. 4"7Yi'�Ju .r'.a�!:" u'$....e�:.3E:a"7Y�'....y�wY q$1'�'.+.q [; IY4 7.� �/ Cp au$.°•�R $oNK�,1�.�{:�p Nhpr,1�w��pNQe$RnN"e�S,o ao/'f�•N�o�"nlYo(^�N�ioHn n�G 1y3,.•1�1{�y.�}"� �rp1.��11 .L! i '! C•4•�° rRq«LA��YY Y✓:��"•1YIu�I,Il�M.Itl O�a Mu+l� l'Y1"'�n'".Il1�US1Y/J I.I✓��p�GJ•UM!s�.'.IY 1.1 .IV �-�� . 'I•'f• a44tl. $tk upF Y4YI.(�JJ• Yf'Mti.gGM uO•tltl°OM',4j -� tl 'tl] 4V yy�H.tldA aY� " e' � I .• 1 AA.tl1$nr r..tl� Pl.:i•. R o; l] SSS =_ �a..:�c"«��'�?�eYw�,3Y'�,�� .�!v,1 w.+n-1u o ..11 p o^• aa Yo��. re Y°��� �yn ..11;�pJp 5 '•� °ra" g3 FS Y' Nv110 Y11nJ Y'fGp,ptl'.1$�tl�a]M "YI.11$ d y6N � �!'•� j +^. h $. n G.1 �•i1 .iYIU'V �Md�ll ;Dt a1Y1\ �OTJ R1.'�iV$•' 1gW ••r 3. � � ��.J.• ��,• .�t i�".• "nsog� 114 R 1 I nen Nn i',,i� ��i..n�r,�°w"d$..a' no.�vl.new�'n�'�'.y°p�,y" M:n°' nl�''�',RS7. �yi n� "a 4.3 i '• ,t7tN. n�l a°9 " ,Q ��h4yy� oF��q�"YY ep*ye9M�EY�1n�?,Ye�vuwy°o�°rd0' °""9°��aq°� h•'IYJ S�"Ae.."4.\5i1r5..a< ``o•.a"Ar.J!7`e..YI�Y,.lhlio..!�li°..I�no..1�9-SA • r.Y���rfrr� 4M yN ' Its dYi'Mh• n _ __ ___. sanY.,IY•rr�wxwm tphw�lwnu I �G�q�11! Y��� �} [ i i � � �!i •1 u ~�:,w•,,• 5 i 1 1 ,ry 1 IEi M ,t i Y! i tiil ^• J �"'^4�8 11y � E �,� IIF S SBS. l,•.M...1..•..•..1-4-..._A,s,G•s- i-,>�--- '��r fj�jF :,;A:�s.y .aas». .:mss-�. - - dY..Yrw YwYw �..wrwY1+Y�.lwrrw+r...+._r.r � r C T i GARD C ITI COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 26, 1973, 7;30 F.M. 1. ROLL 1 BALI,. Prem Mayor Fl,e� H. Bergmann; C-.urc i lmen I n F. Cook, J,-A1 an Patersojt ,tharles L. Norton; Bruce Clark, City dmi istrator;/fi're'd A. A erson, City,, tto ey; Nick Hiebert, it ctor of P,dbLtc Ser/ es 6 Fa cil a Winslow C Brooks, / nning Dir'rcLbr; Rot t B, Adarty rf of Pnlic , Dcris Hattig, / t Rec.apder.' .r✓ /// bse ouncilman Robert C. c 1. biPP!}bVAL MINUT1 , Nt.veriber 12, 19, , (a) #aprcv j as pbb tted aftar n 4,ent d..11tirg� pogI tphlcal error. r/ 1 i, .WRITTEN COMI WINICAr{ONJI ` ! 4. APW VAL OF EXPENDITURE INVE.TMEN•I'S: '14 1577 5 .r to app .veC _7cil ai Ncrton,/Ike-;cr.dFdr'�yyGur-c�J^ar C;. F, f /�1.Lauv=.•i unay►imrus sate of '-mci ptPSP , 5. MONTHLY RF`.PO S ' (s) C nt:LIN•i rt:>n r. ted !hat he we 1 e t : hav= <;g^ q^d :ming lqt .r.s nc,rpc to in thr Pu IL, rrvi,.rs A Fe.iLifte! report each •�nth. � h) M( I a yf3 apprcvt� C:uncilmen Ncrton, A-•d by Cc.0-,:I I .an Pa<emn, vrd by unanimous vjte of Council present. SUMMF.RFIF.1 D DRIVE DEDICATION COMPLIANCE ACRE (a) TI-e City Administrator recommended accrptancP and at..liorl2atton of Mayor \ and City Recctder to rxecute the following agreements; Deed of Dedication ` Cash Bond Escrow Agreement, Stteet Dedication Compliance Agterment and an \ egrrrrent relating to maintenance of lardscaping. 11 (b) Motion to authc.riee execution of the drruTFrt.t C :ncil,man Paterson, seconded by C-nnrilmen Norton. Apptcvrd by unanimous vote of Ccun::ii p-went. �. DXNANCE N 7-3-911 AN ORDINANCE -AMENDING AND SUPPIEMENTING TI 'i Vehicles a",717raffic. OF THE HE ; •ARD MUNICIPAL CODL CONFORM THE 7AVISIONS THERFOP ITH THF APPLI(AB ECT IONS OF CHAPTERS 1 491, 4.9.3, 44 , and 495 OF ErnN RF%'ISFD STATUTES; FIXING EFFECT17 DATE AND DE Nf AN EME{IGF"ICv. (a) Mitt•-, 1o,ApprnvPt Cvuncllaten C;.oa .,, kt 'ird by 5nlien Palttsca, ��Ap$rovh, inanimous vuee cf e•[;.tf AFPRGVAL OF!A SANIJARY WER �XTF ON EEM% G� cge P,.r' {� a,•n g7(iO w. Fr.witM1g Street. F (a) tactor of Publi .: v s V. Pari .ties I -.-,Ra, r• rx ria f agreement levy City to al' e. otic hen uc.h a :u'lt/('s I f 1 .y U.S.A. ,on to t :otlir t.xccu :n t re ,r rt) of _I to%Ncr vr.u.•tded by (.uunciI n Cook./ i /Ap oved by if irimous ve of C,-,un it est nl a. w abstained in tF,at he owns therib ng artment property , rli n then provided his sec Passed by unanimous dote. 6. MISCELL 6.1 Summerfield i= Staff request for Minor Change in General Development Plan and Program in Planned Development District; standard change--S.W. Summerfield Driv:a. Location: North of S.W. Durham Road, east of S-W.. Pacific Highway Staff Findings A. Brooks explained that the staff had recommended and the Commission approved a 61 foot width for S.W. Summerfield Drive. However, following a more thorough study of the maintenance implication, of the proposed development the staff recommended a sixty foot right-of-way. In addition, the City is proposing the Summerfield Civic Association maintain all landscaping and irrigation systems within the public way. Commission Discussion and Action J r� A. Lewis maV..sd.__for approval of the_ six of-wa width for Summerfield Drive._,_Jia zLmanloe un.dEd e n e v e a 'W -Ung M i'Ni"6�r�'>3". ,. 6. 2 S-W. Summerfield Drive - Acceptance of Street Dedication Location: North of S.W. Durham Road, east of S.W. Pacific Highway Staff Findings The staff pointed out that no portion of Summerfield Drive has yet been dedicated to the public. However, it has fJden constructed and is currently being used as access to the areas now being developed. The importance of this dedication was stressed in that some of the areas now being proposed for platting are legally land locked parcels. Page 4 - PC Minuses - November 20, 1973 Staff Recommendations A. Staff recommended acceptance of the deed of dedication of S.W. Summerfield Drive, subject to the following conditions: ° That the minimum ri -way width for S.W. Summerfield Drive a feet. Commission Discussion and Acti n A. The Commissioners had some questions about the division of responsibility for maintenance between the City ar.i Summerfield Civic Association. Fred Anderson stated that the maintenance agreement has not yet been completed. Whittaker stated that he understands that the Commission is in the same circum3tence that it was at thela3t meeting where this item was, tabled to this meeting. That without the completed maintenance agree- meet the Planning Lommission does not have an adequate bases for action. D. Ball abked Brooks and Arderson if they felt satisfied that staff recommendations can be met before this ma'.ter comes before the City Council. Brooks and Anderson replied that yes they could given a reason- able time period. E. Ball moved that the Pl.anni�rig .CUMMi.._pion recommend tha --t_ F�=�n� ;•s accept �h�_ .of M 1—c-Mar, based ,__�aon I._.W,0 ' os end including the staff recommended mended c_o_ndtion and that the Ci y orney and Planning Director be relied upon to see that these conditions are complied with. Lewis seconded and the motion passed by unanimous vote. 6. 5 Discussion - Proposed Ordinance amending the City "�`"`---- Subdivision Ordinance so as to caus d ordinance to conform to Chapte Oregon 973 00.1 Recommendation from City ey A. Anderson expl d the amen t� pointing out that its pose was to bring th and municipal Code o conformance with the requi nts of son State Law. Page 5 - PC Minutes - November 20# 1973 Testimony and Cross Examination �. Mr. McMonagle of Harris an McMonagle Engineering spoke for the applicantodlating that his firm �i revised the prellpf'n' ary plat to include the conth, ons specifi d by the Planning Commission when the street stand d variance was approved. Staff Recommend ia�i` A. Brooks ri-commended\ pa prQval of the Lake Terrace C prepnary plat as submi'tt,@d. - Co sgion Discussion and Action A. Lewis moved to approve the preliminaryt as c. submitted. Mickelson seconded and the mote passed by unanimous vote. 7. SUBDIVISIONS - VARIANCE. 7. 1 "Summerfield" - Variance on paving width, S.W� Summerfield Drive Location: From . . s�--fr9$-fTLf gest of Pacific Highway tr ;.W. 98th, 1100 feet north of S.W. Durnhon Road. Staff finding A. Brooks presented the staff findings, stating that an unuGual hardship would be placed upon the applicant by not granting the request. Testimony and Cross Examination A. Mr. McMoragle spoke for th -j applicant stating his justification for Summerfield Drive being corZ3tructed to a 36--o`ot pavement wi3�Ti raFier Mian the atandar_ ��4 foot w-l"Uth. This was ,, 4 _ predica ecoprimarily uplin Fe T'imited access (4 driveways) which is allowed from adjacent properties directly onto Summerfield Drive. Staff Recommendation A. Brooks recommended approval of the variance request. Page 8 - PC Minutes - 11-6-73 Commission Discussion and Action A. Lewis moved to approve the variance request and Hartman seconded. a mo ion-pa's-se y_ unanimous vote. 8. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW 8. 1 A & W International Location : Southeast corner of the intersection of S.W. Pacific Highway and Garrett Street. Staff Recommendation A. The staff recommended approval of the site development plan with one condition Commission Discussion and Action A. Lewis said that he was opposed to locating an A & W restaurant on this site, but being as this decision had been taken out of the Planning Commissions hands, he would move to approve the Site development plan with the one staff condition. B. Ball seconded the motion, stating his agreement with Lewis' s view of the issue. In addition, he requested staff to verify that the conditions required by Council with the approval of this conditional use would be met by the submitted site plan. C. The motion passed with Hartman abstaining. 8. 2 M+.11er Automotive Location: Sn ,th side of Burnham Street, 125 feet sa of Ash Street. Staff Findings A. Brooks presented findings, pointing out that the applicant had not submitted an irrigation plan and recommending minor changes which would bring the submitted site development plan into complete conformance with the Site Development Plan Review Ordinance. Page 9 - Pl Minutes - 11-6-73 9. 2 S.W. Summerfield Drive-Acceptance of street right-of-way dedication. Location : From S.W. Durham- Road 600 feet east of Pacific Highway to 5.W. 98th, 1100 feet north of S .W. Durham Road. Staff Findings A. Brooks presented staff findings Staff Recommendation A. Brooks recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council acceptance of the deed of right-oF-way dedication for Summerfield ? drive with the following corlc:itions: r 1. That the minimum right-of-way width b 61. eet. 2, All access to Summerfield Drive shall be restricted and dedicated to the public as per approval. by the Ciby Attorney and Planning Director. 60 Testimony V �1p ' I'<0r� AMr. McManagle the project enginee � spoke for the applicant stating the need for a 60 foot right- of-way . He said that phases I and II had already been platted based upon a 60 foot width and that he � saW eas.Qn to add - „_..Qo �a each _side oT £he �eeoi street right-of-way. Commission Discussion and Action A. Ball moved to table the item until staff has had additional time to review and provide a recommendation Hartman seconded. The motion passed by a majority vote with Commissic.-iArg Lewis and Nicoli. voting no, 10. OTHER OU31NESS — ---- No other business was c.�i2idered 11. ADJOURNMENT : 10: 28 PIAT. Page 11- PC Minutes - 11-6-73 h •0 M E M O R A N D U M TO Planning Director, City of Tigard FROM Anderson & Dittman, Attorneys SUBJECT S.M. Summerfield Drive DATE October 29, 1973 I have reviewed the Planning Director's memorandum of October 25, 1973, -etting out the background aspects of South Sttamerfield Drive which I understand the developer desires that the City accept not only as a dedicated street but also for maintenance responsibility. It is my understanding that the dedication proposes a 60-foot right-of-way and the drive has been improved to 36-root width -- curb to curb. The drive was depicted without dimensions on the concept map submitted by the applicant but no formal ap- proval was obtained prior to construction, pursuant to Section 92.014 Oregon Revised Statutes, which requires planning commission approval for the creation of a street or way for the purpose of Partitioning an area or tract of lend. "hapter 696, Oregon Laws of 1973 further provides : "No instrument dedicating land to public use shall be accepted for recording in this state unless such Instrument bears the approval of the city or county authorised by law to aeeept such dedication." Under the definitions of Section 17.08.130 (3) , Tigard Municipal Code, a collector street Is defined: ". a street supplementary to arterial street i system used to some extent for through traffic and to some extent for mraess to abutting properties." The specification a collector street under Section l 17.28.:1,40 include a 60-ft right-of-way and 44 feet of pavement, Whereas, the pavement in this instance is 36 feet only. A further question arises In that, as I am informed, the street was not constructed under City supervision and the problems I arising involve a determination of whether or not the construction �j meets City specifications to enable the City to accept; the future maintenance responsibility. We agree that neither of the procedures followed by the developer, nor the physical facts in this case are in alignment with the requirements of Section 17.28.010 and Section 17.29.040 Tigard Municipal Code. In this context you request our opinion as to whether the street may be accepted by the City in its substandard width and under eircumetancem where the criteria for allowing a special exception have not been mat. -- to .4...W �Y. . 1 Planning Director Memorand,im City of Tigard -2- October 29, 1973 The alternatives available, as you know, are limited to two proposals : a. As a condition precedent to accepting dedication of the street, that the developer be required to increase the width thereof to 44 feet to meet the designed criteria of Section 17.28.040, as well as to furnish evidence that the street as constructed meets the construction specifications for streets of like kind in the City of 71card. b, That the developer be required to belatedly apply for a variance under Chapter 17.48 of the Tigard Municipal Code and the require-ments thereof, and the planning commission, after hearing and review, determine whether findings may be made in conformity with Sections 17.48. 20 and .030 on the facts present to ,justify dedication by deed. If this pronedure is followed the applicant should be required to also furnish the documents and information required by Section 17.28.010 (c) Tigard Municipal Code. A, before, ' he question of meeting the construction sneci- ficatlon:+ of the City will arise if the planning, commission other- wise determiner to approve the dedication. It is mm recommendation that if dedication of the street t,e approved unde,- any theory and the City is to accept responsi- bility for maintenance thereof, ' hat the usual maintenance bond be reo0rn,1 with 1.1te tl%e duration of 5 years from ,ledication, 'or the f')poring Mnw•' '• a. T' e City has • documented ip on the co*Irtru�, irn b. The developer, his contractor an : subcontractor wi, ' he ,tilizIng the street for heavy Hauling through—At the period of development of the Surnerfi•ld project. hat the -ity should not assume the risk of a breakdown in the structural aspects of the road and the -ztra i•urden imposed by reason of the wi ith tie t ng, restricted from 44 fp rt to 36 feet. As an alternative to this latter rronosal , it is recognized, f course, that, the ':ity is under no obligation to accept the street for maintenance purposes, even though it may approve the dedication. With the foregoing comments it is hoped that the problem may to solved on the thasis of the foregoing comments and I wish to thank you for referring this matter to us for consideration. Ander"i0d it Dittman BY tie �4rec _X derson PAA/j '/ M H M 0 R A N D U M TO Planning Director, City of Tigard FROM Anderson h Dittman, Attorneys .SIMJECT S.W. Summerfield Drive DATIP, October 29, 1973 I have reviewed the Planning Director's memorandum of October 25, 1973, ^etti.ng out the background aspects of South Summerfield Drive which I understand the developer desires that the City accept not only as a dedicated street but, also for mnintenance responsibility. It Is my undorstandIng that the dedication proposes a 60-foot right-of-way and the drive has been improved to 36-foot width -- curb to curb. The drive was depicted without dimensions nn the concept map submitted by the applicant but no formal ap- proval %.gas obt•a.lned prior to construction, pursuant '.o Section 92.014 Oregon Revised Statutes, which requires pinnning commission rppraval for the creation of a street or :ray for the purpone of partitioning; an area or tract of land. Chapter 696, Oregon Laws of 1973 further provides: "No instrument- dedicating land to public use shall be accepted for recording in this state unless such instrument bears the P.pproval of the city or county authorized by lass to accept such dedication." Under the definitions of Section 17.08.130 (3), Tag;nrd I- inici.pal Code, a collector street is defined: ". . . a street supplementary to arterial street system used to some extent for through traffic and to some extent for access to abutting properties." The specifications for a collector street under Suction 17.28.040 include a 60-foot right--of-way and 44 feet of pavenent, hereas, the pavement In Chas instance is 36 feet only. A further question -rives in thrit, ns I am informed, tine .tit•reet was not constructed unrier City rupervis,ion and the problems arising involve a determtnation of whother or not the construction meets City r,pecificat'ions to enable the City to accept the future mni.ntenctnee res;ponsibIlity. We ;,.Crce that neither of th^ procedures followed by the developer, nor the phynical facts in this case a.re in alignment with the requirements of Section 17.28.010 and Section 17.28.0110 Tigard Municipal Code. In this context you request our opi.nion as to whether the curet may be accepted by the City in its substandard width and under circumstances where the cr'terla for allowing; a npecial exception have not been met. t Planning Director Memorandum City of Tigard -2- October 29, 1973 The alternatives available, as you know, are limited to two proposals: a. As a condition precedent to accepting dedication of the c:treet, that the developer be required to increase the width thereof to 44 feet to meet the designed criteria of Section 17.28.040, as Drell as to furnish evidence that the street as constructed meets the construction specifications for streets of like kind In the City of Tigard. b. That the developer be required to belatedly apply for a variance under Chapter 1(.)18 of the Tigard Municipal Code and the requirements :hereof, -end the phoning commission, after hearing and review, determine whether findings may be made in conformity frith dactions 17.48.020 and .030 on the facts present to justify dedication by deed. If this procedure is followed the applicant should be required to alno furnish the documents and information required by Section 17.28.010 (c) 'Munlelpal. Code. As before, the question of meeting the construction 3peci- fieations of the City will arise If the planning commission other- 'dee determines to approve the dedication. It is our recommendation that if dedication of t.h�, :;treet be approved utir".er any theory and the City is to accept responst- bili.ty for maintenance thereof, that the usual maintenance bond be required with the time duration of 5 years from dedication, for the following; reasons: n. The C.Ity has no documented inspection file on the Const 1-UL;tIon. b. 'Phe developer, his contractor and subcontractor will br.. utlli.s:ing the street for heavy hauling throughout the period of development of the Surnmerfield project, c. That the City should not assume the risk of a breakdown in the ctru.ctural aspects of the road and the extra hurden imposed by reason of the width being restricted from 44 feet to 36 feet. As an alternative to this latter propoual, it Is recognived, of course, that the City Jr, indcr no obligati.on to accept the stro^t for maintenance purposes, a+.nn though it may approve the dedicatir i. With the foregoing comments it Is hoped that the problem way be solved on the banin of the for-,going co:rments and I wish to thank you for referring this matter to us for consideration. Ando qb3 L Dittman i, yf Ired JC.firrsari FAA/.i `/ 6. Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance A. Brooks said that the City Attorney ' s office is updating the subdivision ordinance to bring it into conformance with the new state subdivision law. He also stated that the problem of interfacing the P. J. zone and the subdivision ordinance will. be esolved with this revisions. 7. Summerfield Bicycle Path A. Brooks read a letter from the Citizen Bike Path Committee and the Tigard School District expressing a need for a bicycle peth along Durham Road. The letter stated that two stut_ents were hit by cars last lear and the need for a facility along Durham Read is urgent. It continued, suggesting that the Tualatin Development Company construct a path along Durham rather than along Summerfield Drive as required by the Planning Commission. B. Whittaker said that both paths were needed and means should be sought of getting a path constructed on Durham in addition to the path along Summerfield Drive, C. Lewis said the Durham Road bicycle path is the County ' s responsibility, sighting a promise made to the high school students to construct this faciltiy. D. Mickelson said that taking the path off Summerfield Drive, a collector street, would result in the construction of a substandard facility. E . Bolen asked the commissioners to base th9.ir decision upon the public need involved and sug��ested a study be made to ascertain where the greatest need exists. He suggested that the greater need may exist on Durham Road and at this time it me be more to the public benefit to put a path on Durham than Summerfield Drive. F. After a thorough discussion the Commissioners agreed that the path along Summerfield Drive should not be j traded for a path along Durham Road. However, the need for the Durham bicycle path was recognized and the Commission resolved to work with the public J agencies 4nvo.lved toward the goal of developing thi ; / a t h. -._._r---,- B. Miscell.eneous A. George Lewis expressed his concern over the length of Planning Commission meetings and quoted an editorial. on this subject from the Oregonian. He said that Page 3 - PC study session minutes - 10--3-73 CITY OF TIGARD, ORE . ENGINEERING DIVISION , P W DEPT PROJECT INSPECTION SUMMARY JOB NO. PROJE17T TITLE DATE:-/O?---/g-- PROGRESS TO DATE -/-).p SPECIAL PROBLEMS: EST. % PROJECT/ ITEM COMPLETION: INSPECTOR CITY OF TIGARD, ORE . ENGINEERING DIVISION , P W. DEPT PROJEr, 7 INSPECTION SUMMARY JOB NO. --- PROJEC - 4 T TITLE' P R 0 G R E S S TO 0 AT E rh SPECIAL PROBLEMS: EST PROJECT,, ITEM COMPLETION: dk oil INSPECTOR CITY OF TIGARD, ORE ENGINEERING DIVISION, PW DEPT PROJECT INSPECTION REPORT JOB � PROJECT TI _'iii DATF:10 PROGRESS: _ 6i'/,P-+ b �li+r✓'G- �Zi�l lac�i. ;x NOTE S.'-,.. VEATHER: 46TO CITY OF TIGARDORE. ENGINEERING DIVISION, PW DEPT PROJECT INSPECTION REPORT J013 PRC ,f r T DATL. _Zp_::7_//_ PROM.SS NOTES : WEATHER INSP',"'- 'ORAt4 A CITY OF TIGARD, ORE ENGINEERING DIVISION PW DEFT. PROJECT INSPECTION REPORT J 0 8 NO. --.. ----- PROJEC'r TI r�z//�'!i►��'id�i�E.� - �Sy /gip'- DATE: i NOT E S-_ '.-rEATHER; ,��/�r.r.i�I.�r..�_•�.w.r.r.nwr�� r �.��ri R ���M...V.�y CITY 07- TIGARD, ORE. E ENGINEERING DIVISION, PW, DEPT PROJECT INSPECTION REPORT JUd NC _ J PRO G R L.S ri NOT F'' WEATHER______ / ----- ._. INSPC OR TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION StA f Report Miscellaneous - Agenda Addition October 29 1973 5.2 Summerfield - Request for Minor Change in General Development ,:Ian and program, in Planned Development District; Standards Change-5.W. Summerfield Drive, Location: North of S.W. Durham Read, east of Pacific Highway. Staff Findings 1. The applicant (Tualatin Development ro. , Inc. ) has requested a change in the general development plan and program approved by Council Ordinance #73-5. Thi_- requested change involves a change in standards for planting strips and a proposed bicycle path and sidewalk along the edges of S.W. Summerfield Drive. The applicant proposes to : a Eliminate bicycle riding within the right- of-way adjacent S.W. Summerfield Drive. All bicycle traffic must necessarily travel nn S.W. Summerfiald Drive. Narrow sidewalk ai&.h south side of subject street from 8 feet to 5 feet. 2. The staff has interpreted the applicant' s request as a minor change in the general develorment plan and program, such changes to be approved by the Planning Dirictor, as per Section 18.56. 1E0, Tigard Municipal Code. Staff made a recommendation to the Planning Commission at their September 25, 1973 study session. Said recommendation was informally approved by the Planning Commission. Said recommendation was as follows: ° That the prop,-)sed sidewalks on both sides of S.LI. S-immerfield Drive be designated bicycle pathways. ° That said bicycle pathways be not less than 8 feet wide on both sides of S.W. Summerfield Drive ° That crop curbs be provided at all intersections of said bikeway with intersecting streets or drives, or other such design accomplished that will not cause a bicycle rider to dismount when traveling from the bikeway across a street or driveway. 3. The applicants have requested to be heard before the Planning Commission concerning their proposal. 4. The 1973 State Legislature passed and the governor has signed S. B. 693, providing an amendment to Chapter 176 Oregon Revised Statutes. Said legislation provides for "not less than two curb cuts or ramps pvr lineal block to be located on or near the crosswalks at intersections. Each curb cut or ramp shall .'e. . . . so constructed as to allow reaGonable access to the crosswalk for physically hanudicappe4 persons. Standards set for curbs arid ramps. . . . . shall apply to all new curb construction and to all replacement curbs constructed at any point in a block which gives reascnable access to a crosswalk. " 5. The pjblic safety is a factor in any decision relating to the subject proposal. Wherever possible, bicycle traffic should be spearated from automobile traff?c. As an ideal, pedestrian traffic should be jeparated from bicycle traffic, however, it is mora appropriate to mix bicycles and pedestrians then to mix bicycle and automobile traffic. From a safety standpoint, a pedestrian holds less chance of serious injury from a bicyclist, than injuries sustainable by a bicyclist from an automobile Staff Recommendation Disapproval of the applicants proposal. The Planning Commission giving authority to the Planning Director to approve a new submission by the applicant, meettrg the following standards: ° That the proposed sidewalks an both sides of S.U. Summerfield Drive be designated bicycle pathways. ° That said bicycle pathways be nut less than 8 feet in Width on both sides of S.W. Summerfield Drive. ° That drop curbs and ramps be provides at all inter- sections of said bikeway with intersecting streets Page 2 - Staff Report - Miscellaneous - 10-2-73 or drives, or other such design accomplished that will not cause a bicycle rider to dismount When traveling from the bikeway across a street or driveway. Said drop curbs and ramps shall be a minimum of 1130 inches wide of a slope not to exceed one inch rise per eight inch run" as per Senate Bill 693. ° The right-of-way width along S.W. Summerfield Drive shall not be less than 61 feet. A minimum 3j foot wide planting strip shall be placed between the curb line of S.W. Summerfield Drive and the proposed bicycle paths. Landscaping as proposed on the applicant'F rroposal received by the City September 17, 1973 :shall be adhered to, said landscaping to continue the full length of S.W. Summerfield Drive. Page 3 - Staff Report - Miscellaneous - 10-2-73 B. Claasked Ball what, wnul.d orci.f the condit ' on can not be met . said that it was e intention of motion that the staff wou. d determine Ole measures necessary to accompl�i�sh the o�ectives of the condition but the matt r cgald be reconsidered by the Planning Ccmmi ion if the matter can not be negotiated td t satisfaction o° the City of Tigard.. C. Nicelj, 'asked if it were 11 ' s intention that the;. City deal with the own or renter of the p,v6perty. Ball replied thj o r. Nicoli 1.6en seconded Ball ' s motion. /r' [a', ,.Xie motion passed by unanimous vote. 5. 3 Summerfield - Reque3t to change the standards for Summerfield Drive. 1. Staff Findings A. Brooks presented the request , delineating the changes ;—inj requested. Basically , these --�—j� changes amounted to elimination of the bicycle r path adjacent to Su7nierfield Drive and the reduction of sidFwalk widths fic -; e to 5 feet. I s 2. Staff Re,.ummendation A. The staff recommended disappic,zil of the applicant' s request and suggested that the Planning Commission grant authority to the Planning Director to approve a ievised sibmission. This to meet a list of five standards included by staff with the recommendation. In summary these standards designated eight foot combined pedestrian- bicycle paths on hot:h sides of Summerfield Drive with dropped curbs at. all intersections. B. George Marshall , of the Tualatin Development Company , stated his disagreement with the staff recommendation. He said it was his belief that pedestrian and bicycles Should not be mixed. That based upon the 36 foot width of Summerfield Drive aild the fact that there will be few cars parked along this street , there is ample room for bicycles to use tha street. Page 7 - PC Minutes - October 2, 1973 f. Ball asked if one path could be designated for bicycle use and the other for pedestrian use. De Mr. Marshall said that people usually ignore such sigi.s and policing is difficult if not impossible. E. Hartman asked if a stripe identifying a bicycle land could be put along one side of Summerfield Drive. F. Brooks said that this type of path does not work well . G. Whittaker asked Mr. Marshall what the original basis was for the 36 foot spine road and bicycle path. H. Mr. Marshall said that the spine road required a greater width being the main traffic_ carrier in the development.. I . Whittaker then pointed out that the bicycle path was a selling point used by Tualatin Development Company when the zone change Was being considered. J. Lewy asked Marshali why Tualatin Development Company was de_erting their original plan. K. Marshall said that his cor^pany no longer Gees a need for a bicycle path. 3. Commission Discussion and Action A . Lewis stated his disagreement with the staff recommendation to put bike paths on beth sides of the street and suggested that Tualatin Bevelopment Company stick with their original plan. B. Mickelson suggested that a five foot sidewalk and 10 foot bike path be considered. C. Ball moved that using the standards recommended �-- by the staff that an eight foot pedestrian path be placed on one nide of Summerfield Drive and an eight foot bicycle path on Oe other. Page 8 — PC Minutes - October 2, 197'3 i I D. Hartman seconded and the motion passed by a majority vote with Barkhurst voting no. E. Mr. Marshall asked if the vote should have not been to approve or deny his request and if he so chose could he continue with his original plan. Whittaker said the original plan could still be followed if he chose to withdraw his request. F. Mickelson asked if dropped curbs at inter- sections would still be required if Tualatin Development Company went with the -originally approved plan. Brooks said yes, according -ta-4.ha revised State subdivision law. 5. 4 Ash venue-DoWntown Neighborhood Plan Disc u cion of Planning Commission memorandum to Council 1. Cem ission Discussion and Action A . rkhurst said that in items #4 and #5 where t e purchase of parks is discussed the word ac uisition should be used rather than purchase. B.. Hart an pointed cut that where the straightening of He 1 Boulevard is refer-2d to in #6 the word- ing sh uld Specify the curve south of Burnham Street. C. Ball stat' d that it would be useful if this plan could\\be refered to as N. f'. 0. #1 r ,they than the to ger title. r). Brooks said t at he felt names were .important for neighbcrho d plans in order to foster neighborhood id ntity . He tilerefore recommended that this be cal ed the Orchard Slope Neighbor- hood Plan. He baed this recommendation upon statements by the . P. 0. r.ritical of the present title for the neigh orhood pion. E . Bolen suggested thatie plan be refered to ag N. P.O. #1 with the tie ber;oming a sub- title to describe the g . eral location. Page 9 - PC Minutes - October 2 , IIJ73 4. The useA proposed arts appropriate• to th'e. p� as proposed by the developer and appteved y ra City Council Staff Recommendation Approval of the uses as proposed by the applicant. 10.3 Summerfield - InPormation relating to approval of Minor changes and portions of the Final Development Plan and Program by the Planning Director Minor Chances sir , Tualatin Development Corporation has requested a change in the standards for SSW. Summefield Dr._ as described in their approved general development plan And program. The requested changes relate to right-of-Way, sidewalk and bikeway widths. The staff is currently studying the request and will bring the matter befor: the Commission at their September 25th study session. Final Development Plan and pxoQram Tualatin Development Corp. has oubmitted their Final Development Plan and Program for the proposed recreation of detailed landscape and site plans. The submission has been judged to be in conformance with the general development plan and program. Upon review by the Commission and if the Commission has no objections, the stafF rmcommends approval by the Planning Director, of the Final PYari and Progr,im for Ors Summerfield Recreation -;enter as submitted by Tualatin Development Corpuration on September 10, 1973, with the exception of that area within the right-of-way n, S.W. Summerfield Drive. Page 3 - Miscellaneous - 9-16-73 Avoid Verbal I'le?ssacles A-1 CITY OF TIGARD -- ►v� w�o _._._.� From : _ Subject:— �1w1ve Date:_ s__ �p !� /�73 J 1 Cie' (T �� r' �. "i+l•tt+ �a�ll/'7�IbN �fSH•1l�lr«7NfG /`i4f/C'['IMCwtT "�� ...-i _,.. oN� Cash ���•1 �Se�c/,L.0 �/ '�'r/�e�+-ier,J`F rtJeeei N�ivkj � '�� ►����� nc11flIF (4 �� �N//lls .l ftrCl� It�S� c�ecC •�� x�rbr ��/4„/�0� .., . I 1� c&All X01 kHloct- be v r-ovec4j; rssucca / II ti CITY OF TIGARDORE . ENGINEERING DIVISION , P W DEPT PROJECT INSPECTION SUMMARY JOB NO. PROJECT TITLE: DATE:.- PROGRESS TO DATE : d;!22Zrkf 722 SPECIAL PROBLEMS: 9-h;96-141,S EST % PROJECT/ ITEM COMPLETION: 'pwcz&,c& "7Y ME it= x --44 - W-'- - Ara-- 'A AdE TZ 44 ol I N SP E C TO R CITY OF TIGARD URE ENGINEERING DIVISION PW DEPT. PROJECT INSPECTION REPORT J 0 B NO - - --- ------- --- - __—_. . --- F'ROJEC TIG DATE: - - -- - - — - ----— --- - - PROGRESS' - T/_ 'aC:TC A" NF. �t) O ' — ------- - CITY OF TIGARD, ORE. PROJECT INSPECTIONNREP�OR7 � J09 NC. DATE PRn GR�.S S fF-�JE-C.?....�Uf.�;T.�-�••.���1-6� �.�r7�L� '�1'l i N 0 T r S WEATHER -- --- ---- - - - - INS ✓y -- c —. ..•MM+M CITY OF TIGARD URE ENGINEERING DIVISION PW ►SEPT. PROJECT INSPECTION REPORT JOB NO__« _ � _ DATE: ' . �- - 71 -- - _. - - --- - ----- P R O G R E S B/qi* /' we;/c fVFJ 7- F /6 �"- i A T H E t-1 76- . 0 41 r CITY OF TIGARD, ORE. ENGINEERING DIVISION, PW DEP- PROJECT INSPECTION REPORT PR0JEG �tAMP?b ._..._ __ _ /�.'E D• P R O G R_-.S a f�F'P� �/n�L,- U i�C�>k_ �-3 t� loo WEATHER / -i43' -_fj_j,-f._� N S" _ 0 y -- ..-- -- CITY OF TIGARD, ORE . ENGINEERING DfVISION , P W DEPT PROJECT INSPECTION SUMMARY JOB NO. PROJECT TIT DATE:, 73 PROGRESS TO DATE4 CO BHE -Tc�Oft; LVE5 T-;L6�- SPECIAL PROBLEMS: 'fes. EST % PROJECT/ ITEM COMPLETION' _L �_�____.` N, SF.cclfR- • E•dF /�1 i ) INSPECTOR/ � CITY OF TIGARD URE ENGINEERING DIVISION PW DEPT. PROsjECT INSPECTION REPORT • JOB NO NROJEY TId"1�� F,-� DATE! PROGRESS: !VOTE S. .1 CITY OF TIGARD, ORE. ENGINEERING DIVISION, -"* DEP' PROJECT INSPECTION REPORT J09 NC, PROJEC PROClRr.93 t G' __ ._. ..._......-- 5&—)— NJ O T r-, r � ER INS" �.---- CITY OF TIGARD URE INGINEERING DIVISION PW - )EPT PROJECT INSPECTION REPORT JOB NO PROJECT TI DATE: - ?,a PROGRESS' 'VOTE S. --,4o77 �-7�Go4�7zAe IEATH Efq 'e R-ov? IN CITY OF TIGARD, URE. ENGINEERING DIVISION, -lW DEP'' PROJECT INSPECTION REPORT J(D9 NC PROJECT DA'rE PR0GR'--.3S wrATHER INS" ' . 0.9 1 u Avoid Verbal Messages A-1 M1�l� r l 0 CITY OI TIGARD To: rc - From : Subj*ct- f n 7 _ } - Da te: ' GVs'tty�� G</L4 C'-t�1�'C�Q�),-yc..�tr,.� d-��"'D�-ct..--� -v'" r•z. �-p •�-/lit yLG�-�/�'C-f i1-Yf / U I /'" ..r� �v►ativ— n /C L, Ryyn ✓�LcT otic�t'-u�'1 ��L -:Z7 64e, 0'l�-t-�l /Cr �l�E' C'i�� .--�,,�.. v.il.,�L¢.1 �r //tisw.�s ��C.� �I�•t-� -�'N-•�c�s� /1�L�r�ly�c� � �/64r-� ..�1•�*-yGvU-t A �.e'sL/L"''l /L'27w� �[{c1 C;���•✓��i� �'`_' 1' 64e'"�Lf-f,�� y DL�. L,f► � v y CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE No-73- ,5 AN ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING LANDS OF TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND FRANKLIN SERVICE CORPORATION WITHIN AN AREA KNOWN AS "SUMMERFIELD" FROM WASHINGTON COUNTY r-R - PLANNED RESIDENTIAL, TO CITY OF TIGARD P-D - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; ADOPTING A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN KNOWN AS "SUMMEHFIELD PLANNED COMMUNITY OF 1972" TOGETHER WITH GENERAL PLAN AND PROGRAM; PRE,1CRIBING CONDITIONS APPLICABLE THERETO; FIXING EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMWRGENCY. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Cits Council finds that pursuant to provisions of Title 18 0:' the Tigard Municipal Code, the City has here- tofore instituted proceedings to change the zone classification of an area formerly under zoning jurisdiction of Washington County, bregon which was annexed to the City by recent order of the Metropolitan., Boundary Commission and confirmed by City ordinance, said area being locally known as "Summerfield" as more particularly described on the attached sheet designated "Exhibit All and by this reference made a hart hereof. Section 2: The C1ty Cowloil further finds that after due and legal notice as by the Municipal Code required,a hearing was regularly held by the City Planniag Commission on December 19, 1972 whereat all Interested persons were afforded an opportunity to be hear: with respect to the change In zone rlassifiration of said lands froro '4ashington County P-rt - Planned ��esidential, to City of Tigard i P-D - Planned !�evelopment District; and thereafter the Planning Com - mission,pursuant to Sec. 18,56.040 of the Municlnal Code, submitted to the City Council findinve and recommendations as hereto attached marke,i "Exhibit I'" and by this reference made a part hereof, that the chance of zoning classification as herein stated be approved subject to the conditions hereto attached marked "Exhibit C" and by reference made u nart hereof, :lection 3: The council further finds that after due and legal notice a hearing was held by the Council at its regular meeting of January ?2, 1973, and thereupon by motion was continued to ands , reconvened on February 12, 1973, whereat all interested persons aAd the veneral public were afforded a further opportunity to be heard with respect to said proposed change of zoning classification of said 1&nds described in Exhibit "A", and the Council further finding that no ' public detriment will result from the granting of said petition and that it is in the public interest that said zoninc reclassification as instituted by the City of Tigard be approved and that said lands be re-zoned accordingly The (.um-rission'e ,1nd1n1•.s are hereby adoptea as tt,P Council' ; rIndtnrs. Section_4: The City of Tigard finds that the development of the said lands as described in Exhibit "A" purevant to the Planned Development District provisions of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be authorized subject to and in accordance with the following: .F (a) Those conditions so recommended by the Ilanning Commission of the City of Tigard, being 20 in number as hereto attached marked "Exhibit C" and by this reference made a part hereo' . Page I - ORDINANCE No.73- 1 'r � (b) The de,�zlopment of said lands shard conform with the general development requirements as set forth in Title 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code and the "Summerfield Planned Community of 1972" concept as submitted by and on behalf of Tualatin Development Company a4d Franklin Service Corporation, a copy whereof is hereto attached marked "Exhibit "D" and by this reference made a part hereof. Section 5: In accordance with the foregoing and subject to each and every requirement hereof, and particularly the conditions set forth on the attached "Exhibit C", the zoning classification of the lands described on the attached "Exhibit A" be, and the same is hereby, changed and said lands are reclassified from Washington County P-H - Planned Residential, to City of Tigard P-D - Planned Development District, and are further subject to each and all applicable require- ments of Title 18 of the Municipal Code of the f'ity of Tigard. .Section 6: Inasmuch as it is necessary in order to preserve the Integrity of the land use regulations and to require adherence to the planned development district requirements as in this ordinance set forth, and thereby provide for the groper utilization of said lands, it is hereby declared to be in the public interest and necessary for the peace, health and safety of the people of the City of igard that this ordinance become effective with the least possible delay, and therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this ordi- nance shall be effective upon Its passage by the Council and approval ty the Mayor. PASSED: i3y unanimous vote of all :ouncil members pre,3ent, after being read three times by number and title only, this 12th duy of Fouruary, 1973. e-co r pr Tikaid �PPH­VED: By the Mayor this 12th day of February, 197'. - �ByOr Page 2 - ORDINANCE No.73- Exhibit "A" Legal Description k4 The following described treat of land being situated in the S.E. 1/4 of section 10 and the S.N. 1/4 ant' S.E. 1/4 of Section 11 T-2S R-1W W.M. Wabhington. County, Oregon. • i Beginning at the 1/4 corner on tho South Line of Section 1' 10 T-2S R-1W W.M. being on the centerlino of S.W. Durham ' Road. County Road 429; Thence: N-89 55' 20"-W 315.78' along said centerline to an intersection with the ealsterly, right of way of S.W. Pacific Hwy; Thence: N-200 30'-E 669.70' more or less along said easterly richt of way to the north lire of that tract described in deed Book 849 Page 19; ':hence: along tho North line as described in 3ook 8119 Page 19 N-89 51'-E 910' more or less to the East ]int of Lot 16 of the duly recorded Plat of Willow Brook Farm; Thence: N-00 08'-E 246.9' to the 17.1'1. corner of Lot 15 said Plat Thence: along the West line of Lot 12 N-00 0i'-71 914.76' to the N.1'l. corner of Lot 12 on the ccnterlinr of S.17. Naeve Street C.R. ,#900• Thence: along said cc:,terlinc of S.W. Naeve Street S-G3d 10'-E 457.71' to the ';.E, cornrr of said Lot 12; Thence: S-00 Cj'-E 311.'31' along the tact lino of Lot 12 to the S.71. corner of that tract descrtbod Book 279, Pate 221; Thence: Foutcrl;, alonC the South lino of.that tr:lct 203.001 ; Thence. "-00 03'-1'r 20$.00' Parall,3?. with the to ;t line of :.all 7.rt 12 ''Ullovi Brook Farm to the ccnterllr.e of S1.11 t:r:^vt .t^^et; Thence: alo.lC; oa,d ce.iterline 1-:30 10'-:. to an interarctira with the cer: .•lLnr of S'17 1.!J', ,h Avertic C.R. #1415 a;;(' C.R. #900; Thenc : S-300 aloe the eor.Lcrlinc o: C.:t. 4nn0 Le tale !1 '; C( :'' ! f l.',t 'Nillo;v ' roe:: Farm; ^'hr nc( i;,)o .00' aloe: th^ north line of ..,: ! Lot ; t.!- the r' r thoJ•_ •.,f also twin; the :,7' Corner ^f Lol. L u fir; i•'l r, Plat �f t!:7 :,ur:uerl l- 0c i Ti oc L�; or '.on 1 r err tc tvlcen Sec tion.. 10 ,. 11 :' •ZIS U'," 1318.32' from the li!, ucc tion corner ;i cti u:.:.y10 and 11 , eaCc: :'-')o 07' 3U" 32'9.711' alc,:J rCt.nn 1:110 bet';-cc,: Scctlo?, k, and 11 t".c ." . r .i I o! '.uL oC elle ..a: ;IIUJ'1Lr Ccl.-. Tract..; TF'eacc: ,'- ; slon;; t he rorth ti!.c of -:4.d ;.ot Lo t 1;: .t. Cornk.•r t!,cre o f; 5'hencc: 1-00 0'.' 1,"•" 32(..9?.' ulv:. • U., t,-..,t .11:.; of Lot- 'J and u tc tllr S.E. cur cr of Lot :,; enc,:: continuing S-70 05' h';"-'r 'r0.W' L.urr or Iesa to the N.'J. corner o: Lot I? of the d. l f flat. of Alder book Farm; Thesee, 6490 58'-Z 665.94' along the north line of Lot 17 to the centerline of S.W. 98th Avenue County Road #2048; Thence, N-00 09' 16"-t 653.06' along the centerline of S.W. 98th Avenue to a point which is 3-00 09' 16"-W 326.70' from a 3/4" iron pipe at the intersection of S.W. 98th Avenue and S.W. Sattler Road C.R. #727; Thence, N-890 54' 56"-E 801.90' parallel with the centerline of S.W. Sattler Road to a point on the West line of Lot 14 Alder Brook Farm Plat; Thence: N-00 09' 16"-E 36.70' to the centerline of S.W. Sattler Road; Thence: t'-89 :4' 56"-E 1019.39' along the centerline of SW Sattler Road to the N.E. corner of that tract described in Deed Boob 251, Page 6431 Thenco: B-00 52' 38"-W 1101.56' to a 1/2" Iron pipe; Thence, S-00 25'-W 1091,.60 to the centerline of S.1'1. Durham Road C.R. #429 also being the South line of Sr�ctlon 11 T-23 R-1W M.M. Thence: S-890 51' 40"-W 1142.09' along south line of Section 11 to the 1/4 corner; Thence: on the south line gf Section 11 and the centerline of S..'l. Durham Road 5-89 16' 30"-;'1 331.981 ; Thence: N. 07' 21"-E 894.26' alone the west lihU of lot 19 of Aber ',rook Farm Plat to the N.W. corner thereof; Thence: S-8'J r,4' 31"-N 330.11' to the N.W. corner of y{ lot 20 9-Ad Plot; Thonce: continuing S-890 54' 31"-W 665.281x" alone the south line of Lot 17 said plat to the S.W. corner thereotl Thence: S-0'j 05' 4511890.94' alonC the vicut line of Lot 22 Alder :!roo'l Tarn Plat to the centerline of S;'1 Durham Road and L!:e eOutlJ line of Section 11; Thence: S-3)o 16' 30"-'3 132x,.1,2' to the SCI corner of Sectlnr' 11 T-23 R-17l 1'1.11. "cin- n ?" iron pipe; Thenen: S-`(''90 '52' 0'J"-1V 2627.91 ' alonf; t1:r centerline of S.'1 Durham Rond and the Soutar lin: of :cc tion 10 T-23 R-1111 'Jit'. to the 1/4 corner N „ and the place of be-innille. Exhibit "8" RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF Zone Change No. 5-72 WIWJiFAS, proceedings have been conducted by the Planning Commission of tte City of Tigard with respect to the petition by the Tigard Planning Commission for a change of zone clasFi- fication from Washington County P-R, Planned Residential to City of Tigard P-D, Flanned Development. WliLkkA.13, pursuant to Chapter 18.84 of the Tigard Municipal Code after due and legal notice, a public bearing was. told by the Tigard PAaiuiing Commission with respect to the above described proposal on the 19th day of December, 1)12; NOW, THElWORE, the Planning Commission of the C_ty of Tigard in meeting a^sembled this bth day of February, 111�, uov resolves to and does hereby adapt and/or approve the following Finding;; of Fact with respect to the above designated proponal: r 1. The r;ubject property is designated for Urban Lov Density Residential development within the Tigard Community Plan. This category allows residential den,itiee of up to 4 dwelling units or 12 persons per gross residential acre. The proposed development is in substantial conformance with the Tigard Communtiy Plau. 1. That exceptions from the Standards of the underlying dirtrict are warranted by the design and amenities lnecrporated in the development plan and program. The plan includes: a. 201 acres supporting 1150 dwelling uni, s b. 1.)ie persons per dwelling unit or a maximum of 2400 total population c. Typical residential lot area of 4,000 :quare feet d. 4�.5 acrer, of golf course and natural reserve areab e. Approximately [0,000 square foot recreation building maintenance building, lakes, pool, t.truii-, courts and parking for 125 cars. f. ;ingle family lots of 50' x dol with l0 feet front, 4 .foot side and d foot rear yards. hear and side yard setbacks may be waived for "c,mmonwall" or "zero-lut lire" dwellings. j. The uevelopment plan is in harmony with toe itirrounding area and will have a beneficial effect on the area which c-ould not be achieved under other toning ulstrictb. I I w page 2 4. The _system of ownership and the means of developing, preserving and maintaining open spaces 1,; suitable. 5. That each phase of development can be substantially completed within one year of each approval. o. The Community Plan does not designate commercial development for the northeast or southeast corners of Durham Road and Pacific Highway. 7. Adequate community shopping and commercial facilities are provided in proximity to the development--at the King City shopping center. o. with development of this magnitude, road improvements will be required to serve the additional reeident population and those who will use ',he public recreational facilities. y. The ;)epartment of Environmental Quality has approved nonoccupancy building permits--to allow construction of model homes. Connections to the King City treatment plant will depenc upon D.S.Q. approvwl of the completed treatment plant expansion during .-973- 10. The Tigard Mater District is In the proce:. of connecting its line2 to the Lake Oswego water ;.ystem. Thls should be completed by May of 11)j3. 11. Housing will have age restrictions In the project by the developer. IT 15 FURTHSF Mt OLVEU tivwt the Planning Commis ion doer, hereby approve the above described proposal and hereby record:, its recom- mendation for favorable action by the City Council PASSED by a • , - vote of the City f laiu{ing Commission, thin Uth day of February, V71- FrEsidont A1TWT: Secretary I, { of the request -ith the f01 " ewirK coed - �v 1. Pri. to the issuance of any buxtding permit within the development, a site plan of the entire development setting forth the site development standards shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and "EmAl it C approval. This plan shall include but not be limited to landscaping, setbacks, build.tng heights, signs, streets, proposed improvements, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, parking, service and storage areas. All land within the development shall be residential and recreational �ur�o used for area designated for commercial u�ason, except t plan 1e may include service and/or profth Muses office uses serving the development. If such uses are approved, the Planning Commission shall approve the location, eccaes, siting and range of permitted uses. 3. Each phase of the development shell be reviewed and approved by the P"u"ning Commission. At the time of •ppraval of each phase, the densities and uses shell be approved. 4• A boat and trailer storage area shall be designated in an are.x contained by an opaque fence or sight obscuring landscape screening maintained at not less than six (b) feet nor more than seven (7) feet in height. 5, "he apartments in the' project shall be developed in a`'cordance with A-2 standards on a specific unless otherwise approved site plan by the Planning Commission. 6. The overall density of the development shell be no greeter than 6.25 dwelling units per acre (1250 total ,nits) with a total population not to exceed 2400 p•reone. 7. The setbacks and lot sizes a• proposed for single fam"Y units shall be approved unless otherwise specified by the Planning Coamission, except shell be a ten (10) foot minimum ythat there ard requirement cher• any yard abuts a public atreet. e• Approval of any lots to be subdivided shall be through the Subdivision Ordinance procedures, 9. upon splice shall be maintained through ® Homeowners flubMited for by the developers with convenants euboitted for approval et the filing of the final plat 10. All utilities shell be subsurface installations. 11. Housing shall be llaited to an average density of no more than 1.92 persons per dwelling unit. 11, E:x,.luded parcels surrounded by "Summerfield" shall he .ncluded in the site plan with the possibility ,. isoleccaes provided these parcels ation. to eliminate their P.1 - EXHIL3IT "C" i --. 4 13. There shall be dedication to 45 feet from centerline on S.W. Durham Road. 14. There shall be dedication of 35 feet from centerline with a 40 foot improvement provided on S.W. 98th where the development abuts both sides of the road and a half street improvement where the development abuts only one side of the road. 15. 'There shall be sedicatlon of 25 feet from centerline (3' feet improvement) on S.M. Nneve Street with half street improvement ~hare applicable. 16. There shall be dedication of 30 feet from centerline on S.W. Sattler (36 feet improvement) with half street improvement where applicable. 17. Internal street improvements will be designated at the time of the platting of the subdivision. 18. There shall be no occupancy without public water and rawer. 19. 4 :npy of the deed restrictions and covenants shall UP attached to the approved plan to help insure -r-.fortuity with planned densities. 2u. Vhbse iI of the developm•n' shall not be approved until additional water ser .ce is available to the :iaard Water District from the City of Portland anr:/or City of Lake oevego. fR. 14 • Staff Poport - "Summerfield" I 1 ., - EXHIPTT Thio uni:ii.atu ir L,;;.- fl,otho �1'piiir Ron(, in mcr-ir;�'r r t'i tl— !)Lmiu. (0-00 to 49*.0 at SW 9?)v� A *'hocc costn do 1. rl (11 7 lull 998T. 1 7 In • It n, r- ,,rndn o 14 2 11MOOO 6.00 6:1.50 100 I C.I ru'l-', 11A 71 tnr. 2., rr r 6C)O 475900 -1 119 0 r)O xv;u Col.. -JQ-w Lm9 6 A 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 I , S :amirfiold Custruc,tion Coat rstiraste a. trunk .Moria Draina—t ne The eetiliaite in baced on the dcvoloprier.t o:: thin facility so allown Oil the ple:-.a for t.jo ,3pina :quad All UlUt co.,..-*r; aro based on 1972 pr.icor unci wnditio.,u; "or :ll ' of W00% iIi�'�71V.. .. iilU .� BUJ ,. „U :tic�t i:'c:1,1 lc i;).tarurt durin , conrtt,•„c+.ion, porsiit foono oati,lae3tw,tf 1� t,ax.?r, u- laird coA:A. Z11 •; CF 2)TAL PIt2CF �nit 1? co .-C. aluL� ire n(t1 P-3.00 1j:1;j�300.00 unlle.0 re flaC tlo)l ):on1lw 1,131, 12 C.A. ”. 1 ''111 11, ..0 1 - .., 27,724-00 !1.211 Ra,w V.A.P. :lro ; on ?30.00 ROi1Crr.':A ►•car+ �:�n11. r tr tc�1�, , 1 ,��,,• 1, ,0• 450.00 11211 corr.nhlm. Irpr.hcll.e 7�t��i'.'; �' . rl�' ? l.•��'�(1O 2,740.00 90.00 4211 i'.U)•Z'• �t'i 1.' 1 i Ont (` 1•nr1 (100,00 "'erttlrAtillri tlJ Lf cmrso 1•., o+,t; 100.00 COO.00 t r CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON STREET DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GENERAL INFORMATION SHEET I. PROJLSCT lfo.t _ SUMERFIELD DRIVE II. PRWRCT NAME: _ --- -- SUMMiFIELD SPINE ROAD St. Imp.da ted t 8 /lta/ 72 M. DRAXIM,: (TITLR) t M _ IV. PLAT (TITLE)t none S.W. Durham Road V. SITR LACATIONs - --- — VI. PRINCIPAL.St A Co-Venture Tualatin Develepement Co., Inc., & Franklin Serv. Corn. (1) DZVBLOPER: — T.D. C. --Roy Brown or George' Address_ —, Phone No.Marshr., 1Ja49-.3101 (2) DEVlJAPERS SURETY AGENCY: Benjamin Franklin Savings_& Loan Co. Address �_. Ph.)ne No.___- Band No. r_ __ - Exp. Late_ Harris - McKanagle 0905 S.W. Gaamercial St. Add ressT_ si, ntt-�_�_7»�.�---- Phone No._.632-3453 • t Leonard Cook (4) IM SCTORt Address City of Ti rd Phone (S) PRIME CONTRACTOR: Addrest+ Phone No.--.--- (6) o.--.-(6) coUTRACTORS SURETY AGENC1l1`__._._..___--_-..__._._.__- ------ Address �.__.._----- Ph.-,ne Bond No.,,_,__-_—__ _, Exp. nate (7) SUB-CONTRACTORS' • V,. S1J1414FRFD',LD DRIVE DEDICATION DESCRIPTION PRO14 S. 17.DURIi �i ROAD TO S. W. (33111 AVENUE The following described tract of land commonly known as S. W. Summerfield Drive situated in the S. W. 1/1+ of Section 10 and the S. 1/4 of Saction 11, T-2S, R-11t' t'J.ti. , City of Tiaa.rd , Washin:rton County, Orefm,n. -7;inninl; at a point on t}ic )otkth lino of :sect 10 and the center line of S. W. Durham Road C. P. /«429 N-,"So 52' -F, V)9.7;,' from the quarter cornor on the South line of Section 10. Said point: bein- Station 0 00 of the follovine, described (,0.001 r:i6th ri;;ht of way 30.00' of each Hide of tho folloiainr: dencribe:rl center Line; thence t1-00o 071 J3"-A" ;5.001 to Station 0 "x).00 P,(;. ; thence alonf; the arc of a 100.00' radius curve to the right havinfC a central angle of 1230 231 2311 the chord of which bears ':-;*Io 36' 17"-E 176.151 (an arc dint n-' :e o f 215.501 ) to Station 3 00.90 P. T; thou 72.001 to Station 3 ;-2.50 P.C. ; thence aloe_ the *II'C 0 L �: . ' radli.is curve to the loft flavin , a central anf;lc of 920 1?_ ' 19" t chord of which boars N-770 14' N11 -F 310.63' (an arc distance of 34., .�k6' ) to Station 6 99.3,, P.; . ; thence -310 381 7. ' t:n Stat:L.)r. 10 27.22 I .(:. ; thence alone* ten arc of a :, ::.i :'.; i i,u .right having, a central an-In Of 7'�0 0,' i; '' !;' ciloi,(. Oi tiJZIi.Cl, l,e�ertl iv�f�7C lilt ��'i'�i i.,l.``. 7J� (an me :��:ta. ;�. 7�S?.961 ) to ":9tion 17'67.19 P.T.; thence S�-W-;"' 45' ?,3' -', 137..1. ' to ",tat_ c.)i lis 9'1.35 I'.C. ; thence &I,.)»7 the r1rc of a ji�'i, 1 1-n UAr.j ni11"7 ',' " ' oft 'lavi` c, a c'Intral an f'lu of 144 7". .g ,► (ar 4 � � i •: � ; .'i�, I'.'('. ; t►,once .,1.390 301 ;�: ' ' t ; < t .' : ' .' ? .'� . ; thence alon-, tho arc of n 2,- f, _ +. , �. 1 1 :l; a central an-lo (an crc c',i.ai:u.;c'_ thence 'r,ix,: --,1 21 7; t t7 .�! �-- i i• V'o arc of a 't . :71 ray.iur vc to tl,c ri;;t.t• havin • a cvntral angle of 21 ) ?•31 1011 the chorf, of bcar,!a "-;30 X31 13,,4.121 (ter, are eistanc« of 1 "!; .2�)' ) t , ration ',' ��.', 11.T.; thence S•{ 4?' 2' r� , -T' '3.991 to "tation 37 '39.07 PRr% ; thence along the rare of a r.a(tiur c'arvr. to Vie,, left iiavi-v, a central angle U1" 21' (1 > 1 '>ll" t' C1:Ci'_. - f which bearri '1-310 231 47""F', 290.211 (an grc dictancc of 2;'2. 1 ) to "tfatIcr, ', 32.33 I'.`1`. ; the:;ce 3 371 n�i�-'; 3;;;.'?f.i1 to ..",tation 43 66 I'.C. ; t:;cr+ca along the arc of a 1. ,150.53' raaiuc curve to t,.,, ri;*ht `;ruin„ u central anrle of 050 31 ' ".3" the chord of :!'.ricer boars r1-710 221 59"•r; 140.021 (an are distance of 14x).071 ) to Station 145,06.34 P.T. ; thence it-74r` 031r„�” 2nr�.02' to Station -'�7 11.36 Z'.C. ; thence alonr~ tho arc of a 6(134.291 radius curve to the right having a central angle of V ", 00' 1,")" the chord of wl„ich hears 11-820 091 17"•I11 1 '" . .)3' (are �rc distance of 1;+1.15' ) to Station 1fn, 02.11 P.T. ; thence. S..';g g01 tit}”»' r55.001 to Station 1 9 , 57.rA and thea terminus of this dencription4 said terminus being* on the center line of S. W. )uth Avenuo C.R, A2043 and tied to the quariter c .rner on th . South line of Section 11 theough the following courson and die�`.arcost Beginnin;* at the above said terminus; thence S-000 09' 1tS"—W 1,143.28' along the center line of S. W. 93th Avenue C.H. /{2048 to its intersection with the "ouch line of Section 110thon,;e alone; the South line of Section 11 I7-890 1C.' 30"—I` f.�6LG)2' to the quarter corner on the South line of Sectio. 11. _..__... .._._ .... ... W....._.._. C "T `.. _� ;;r �j /J', a /f � moo► ' r <</•�r r. / J t B A J1 4A#4 �-•`�/�����/ Arte , �r� Y~ �� � ick V Ii ►"p � ,p' 1 b L1 T L_ET r co Pf1 5 z_ a � 1`.� PCS�S' J • / �`, �� t �,, N f \Ye' dl 00 SIO C51o 50 • X9 .02. i�Fw=L z— y Q=c _ LLI I � LL I LI L W c, 4, cn U � o� I II " � Wr- Q V) CN � Q P .� W o ` W� LL ` > 'qj C WUo LliWLn Q ' Ll co itT7Ll � I IT t I 1 O «. •� ,. gr 7 13. T err, shall bo dndi-c.,Alon to 45 foot fro:a ccntorlin:^ on .i.W. DirlwiT. Rond. �,�'I-,,4k ILI r4 ..,r 3s . 14 . There shall be dedication oft feet from centerline with a 40 foot improvement pe Kdad on S.W. 98th where the development abuts both sides cf the road and a half stroat irzproveaent where the development abutn o.ily ono side of tho road 15. There shall be dodicntion of 25 feet from conterli.ne ( 32 feet improvorient) on S.W. Naeve Straet with half street improvement k'_ioro applicable. 16. There shall be dedication of 30 feet from centerline on S.W. Sattler (36 feet improvement ) with half street Improvement whore applicable. 17. Internal street improvencnts will be designated at the time of the platting of the sutAivision. 18. Tbere shall be no occupancy without public watt+r and -s-weir. 19. A copy of the de©d restrictions and covenants shall by •ttRched to the approved plHn to help innure c or-'for-mity with p`.nnned denr.i ties. 20. P1169A II of the di!velopriont shell not ba approved until additional water service is avellable to the lgard water District from the City of Portland and/or City of Lake Oswego . 11g. 4 - Stm f f Report - "Su:nmerf 1 eld" GEA-8744 e General Electric LUMINALIHF 250 UMINA � S-250 SPAC LOW" LUMINAIRE A, *,,, 1. Stays as modern as the latest light source— Powr/Module' assembly contain: all major electrical com- ponents This means you can up- grade to new light sources simply by changing Powr/Modules You dont need to cha lge luminaires 2. Cleaning time significantly reduced —Filtered optical assembly cuts cleaning costs and preserves max- imum light output All an entering the refractor/reflector area must pass through a self-cleaning, activated-charcoal filter Air- 5. Quick,easy access Hinged glowshield and refractor permit borne contaminants are thereby excluded Enclosed lamp area easy access to the Interior components The refractor door can stays clean and bright be opened as needed--usually this is only to change lamps 3. Controlled light distribution—Engineered prismatic refractor 6. Choice of distribution patterns—Adjustable socket lets you accurately controls light output. A big plus You get light dis- choose vrn,r lamp and light distribution pattern tribution patterns. not puddles of light The large glass area subdues glare,gives you softer, more comfortable light 7• Quick, on-site assembly--Sllpfitter hub and quick-fitting ex- 4. Striking visual appearance, precise light control—Diffuse tension arms permit rapid installation In all possible mounting glowshieid adds design distinction—day and night Different arrangements Method of unit packaging lets you assemble light sources produce different aesthetic effects on the glow- on-site without delay shield It also has a built-in light shield to minimize spill-tight and to produce cutoff in the critical flare zone 'Trademark or General Electric Company GENERAL ® ELECTRIC L.� GUIDE FORM SPECIFICATIONS NOTE.Specify desired characteristics where indicated to specify The luminaire shall be the General Electric S-250 Spaceglow. The luminaire shall be for use with(specify) 175 or 250 watt mer- cury lamps The luminaire shall consist of a formed aluminum canopy, an ex- truded aluminum side wall, a plastic enclosing glowahield to form the bottom assembly. an internal structural support assembly to which shall be mounted an easily removable Powr/Module contain- ing the major electrical components, a sealed, filtered optical assembly consisting of a hydroform aluminum reflector, and an easily removable, precision molded, borosillicate glass refractor The mount-iq arrangement shall be a cast aluminum slipfitter hub deslgi eo `or installation on 3-inch OD pole top. The slipfith r huh(with aluminum extension arms,where required) shall be sultabla for mounting (specify) either one or two of the Spaceglow lu ninaires The optical F.ssembly shall contain an activated charcoal filter to screen out airborne contaminants as the luminaire ''breathes." The opening between the reflector and refractor and at the socket entrance shall be suitably Basketed as o prevent tho entrance of dirt,bugs.etc.The socket shall be adjustable In three vertical and three horizontal positions to give desired light distribution pattern. The entire luminaire shall be shipped in one container; the slip- fitter hub (and extension arm, if required) in a second container The finish of the luminaire shall be the standard gray paint (If other color finish desired, so specify) DIMENSIONS 1.1,x• -T---i- �L . l,i l atop 1 1 • 1 PU•E MOUNTING ARRANGEMENTS k'__y ,_ SINGLE CLOSE COUPLED SINGLE 18"OFFSET TWO CLOSE COUPLED 180° TWO 18' OFF3E1 1800 HORIZONTAL SL(PF 11 i ER GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Lighting Systems Business Department, Hendersonville, N. C 11:72 190M1 9400 67 0000 (10U () # -.. 4 1 0 0 0 0 U O U u # 5000OOODU 690 . 7 9 4 0 0 U U 0 # �'• 262 . 296436 74 # 6 ;39 . 059410 1. 5 # 261 7 185 10914 # 2 3 3 4 7 4 6 3 6 i 0 U # 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 u # . 000 00000 # 45 000000 u # . 00000000 # �, 58 00000UUU # 1 31 1 5500t:� 322484858 ;3n # (b 1 2 7 1 2 6 5 5 3 1 8 # 1015 . U00 () 00U0 # ` 2585 0372234a # 4 2 4 6 1 8 7 4 9 1 4 1 8 # . 00000000 # 7 0 0 U 0 0 U 0 G # 8 3 t) U 0 0 U 0 U u # 53 00000000 # 7 0000000U # 85 600000oo # ' 59 . 0 () 0 () 00uu # 84 . 95` 9 77 7 3u # 7 6 93400UOU # 194573 79n 9 1985406 ,. n # 1 950 . 55 17 '173U # 6 38 ' ] 0 ) 4 . 8 (1542621 # 2575 . 83868119 # 2536 J5702791 # 6 1 Ot) i) OODUU # 36 00001,) 00u # 89 . 000000U0 # r 1 1 • () 0000000 # 30 • 00u0000u # 176 1 5 5 0 0 0 U 0 # 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u # 8 ,3 770809 71 # 659 . 49 3 0 0 U 0 u 154 . 96139992 # 5 . 75507215 # 2034 . 31158101 # 659 . 4678886 ( # 1 1 7 9 . 7 6 6 8 1 6 1 3 # 2 5 8 1 . 5 9 .3 % 5 5 0 4 3 1 9 7 . 7 ? 4 9 1 6 513 # 5 6 l) 0 0 0 0 0 U c # 3 9 E) 0 U 0 0 t J 0 # 8 1 U E 1 S1 0 0 0 t.i u # 3 3 0 0 0 1') U U UI) A r, 3 3 O O G 0 0 U t) U 52 11000U0u �) # ; 42 00 U (j001) # ' 2 8 5 8 0 1 5 3 1 6 n # 6 3 5 9 ,3 U u () l i u # 43 441 625 ( ,i # 9 ;3 ' 96963 # 2005 . 74 ? 40 6i' 8 . 41 5558 7 I # 1723 . 208451 d5 # ' 2674 . 8191246r # 381. 614047w � y # 77 UOOU () i) Uu # 1 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 k� # 7 3 0 0 0 0 () O O U # 1 8 . 001) 0000 () # 3 7 . 0000 UOU1► # 31 0 . 6170t, 0t) L # 24 0000 OuU u # 6 8 . 6 1 6 2 6 1 7 9 # 7 1 9 . U 7 7 0 0 0 0 u # 3 02 • 95369 5 r 1 # 61 7689 <' r 6 # 2074 . 3586 + 564 # ), 1 El E3f38 () I. 25 # ` 1516 1 621 4756 # 2 7 16 ` 86646 9 .3 # 31 • t) ot) OOOu �.� # 8 • 0000000U # A ;1 • 0 (1111) o Ul) # 8 • 0 0 0 u UoU ,: # 4. 5 3 . 0 () 00 t) 00U M 32 T ' 860000c.,j # 59 • 000UU0Uu # 280 . 63 (` 57686 # 1 63 . 4190000U # 1. 69 ri 48031 # 1 7 366 ;39118 .3 tf 2 .3 5 4 9 8 9 ) 7 '1 5 .1 # � 1 6 J 4 9 :t 6 2 8 6 5 # l 695 . 6869508 ', # 2 / 53 . y5499 'rib # 41 q8 • 821yE15 , w � A � . 01) 0000 ;, ; # U 4 " . 000000uu # ` 6 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 u # 9 9 4 0 0 0 1) u h 6 11663961 n # 8 .1 7 0 9 8 9 9 4 a 2. 74 7 838 358 1 4 # 4282 . 59389533 # 8 i 0000 OUu P 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 u # 47 0o ouCJ00 # r� 290 . 24100000 # 43 41 937153 # 786 . 9749052 / # 2 7 9 1 2 5 7 7 2 9 6 1 # x 4 5 6 9 5 6 8 8 0 0 6 0 # 68 0060u0uv # 37 OOOUOUOU # 0 0 0 0 0 u U u # !` N 333 . 941 0001) U # 1. 21 . 7568 62 1 y # .� 1 0 953 1. 44 ,36 # 2 '' 1 3 0 1 45 9 1 # 0000 000 u # 4880 . 5219449 # 9 000000 # 1 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 U u u # 1 1 432800i1 (� u0 7 1 O U O O O u # 1 1 4 3 2 7 5 8 4 9 8 y r # h c12 . 00000o « u # 3 08t) 49643n # 59 000000O0 # 1896 . 30171 () 4i # -X 1 40 i! 16t) tIODU # 54ti 1 (1978699 ,; # All 44 . 69 $ 646 � :� # 1 3 2 6 8 1 5 2 u 6 # ' 2957 . 1132 ;18 y # 8900000uUU # 5 0 1 3 1 1 1 4 r 4 6 ! q 1 6 0 0 t 1 0 U 0 u U # 3 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 U u 74 t 0000 ) Gu # 66 6 ,' t) UU () U # 8 X10000 IGU # i 8 3843350 # ' S 8 o o o u () 0 u u # 6 6 2 . 5 6 8 9 5 3 4 # 205 . 111. 9000 (1 .) # 1 9 686C) 53 :l # 149666 1 6 ) 1 3 66682 ; i # 7 9 7 . 2 2 3 6 4 0 3 3 # 3 0 ) .3 . 7 0 y 8 y 9 1 y # �\ 521 C) 4 ,351 1 494 # # 1) 0001) 0 (1 , # 7 000000uu # ' 6 . ti 1 5 9 .- , # 1 8 8 . 7 4 3 4 2 4 # b 3 0 3 9 7 1 5 8 1 5 1.) 2 # 5399 . 17856618 # 1 8 9 0000 uUL) �: # 5 0 . 0 (1 0 () U U u u # 44 . 0000uU00 k ► 55 . 00 (10 UUu # '\ 148r547un # or ` 9 t9948UG 1 8 # 30 14 �; 7 / y71 j .: # 5 4 5 4 . 1 7 8 J b b i 6 # CITY OF TIGAltD, OREGON CONSTRUCTIONrNSPECTION (P.W ) PROCEDURE CHECK LIST NOTE. :UTILIZE ONLY clearly mArknd APPROVED PLANS. pl ,n revisions, change ordera, specifications. etc. '. 1. SANITARY SEWER. l7 / (A) Commenced instal' ring •, ,«•«.••° ^°,••^„« _..� (B) Completed installat.inn. .. ....-. ...••• ❑ ���'� 1.) A5"-built field notes filed. .....«.... ❑ A) Cc,:-,, sent to engineer. . . .. ,� . . ❑ �) As-built field note” received. . . ... , . ❑ A) Filed in project folder. . ❑ (C) Inspected And Tested-. ❑ i) Test nomonogrAphe filed. . - ❑ (D) Tentatively accepted by City.. . . . . . •- ❑ I1. STORM SEWER: (A) Commenced installation_ ._ . ❑ (B) Completed installation. . . . . .. . ••• ❑ 1) As-built field notes filed«.........,.. ❑ (C) inspected. . .•.......... ❑ J / _�_, , r (D) Tentatively Accented by City,..............«. ❑ III. CURB: (A) Commenced ❑ 1) Bench Marks set. .......... ❑ 7) Bench Mark location9 filed. ............ ❑ (B) Completed in�tnll.Ation...........^..•.......•1^ ❑ r r (C) Irspected. . . .. .. ,« ......«...,.... ❑ r 1 (D) Tentatively Accepted by City................. ❑ J / IV, STREETt (A) Commenced GrAd.ind. . . ❑ J r 1) Sub-•grAAp in,rected. . .. . .. .......... ❑ a) Test data filed. ..... . .•..«.. ❑ b) TentAtively accepted by City, ❑ (B) Commenced rocking. . . . . . .. . .. . . I.........«.. . ❑ J / 1) Sub-LARP inApPcted. . . ..............^. ❑ r a) Test data filed....... .. .. . • ❑ b) TentAtively accepted by City. ❑ J L (C) Commenced PAvinq ❑ 1) pavinq inspected, ., .. .. . ..... .. ❑ a) Teat data filed. . .,. . «. «. , ... , ❑ b) Tentatively Accepted by City. C) r ' (D) Street tentatively ACCP ted by Cit J / V- PARKING LOT% / (A) Commenced grading.,..........*-*a......•••. ❑ 1) Sub-grAdp in•rected. ❑ a) Test data filed..,.,•....... .. ..... p b) Tentatively accepted by City. ❑ (B) Commenced Rocking.. .,., . . - r-. ... I.....— (3 1 / l) Sub-base inspected............... .... ❑ A) Test data filed... . . • .... [3b) Tentatively accepted by City, p / (C) Commenced Paving. .. , ......... ............. 1) Paving in,pected.... a) Test data filed---., p b) Tentatively Aerr.utodby City....: ❑ (D) Parking lot tentatively accfepted by City,..,., ❑ VI. SIGNS (A) Street name sign" ingt4lled........... ... . ..,. ❑ (B) Traffic signs ingtallod.. ...,:.«.<..... ........ O _.[=L� VII, SIDEWALK: (A) Commenced installation.. ..................... 0 / (B) Completed installation-- 01_ 1 __ (C) Inspected....... —,— . — ..... . . ... .... O (D) Tentatively acme—tod by City. .... O VIII. STREETLIGHTING4 (A) Commenced installation,........... ❑ / (B) Completed installation..................,,:...,,. ❑ (C) Inspected. O ...... . . . . (D) Tentatively accepted by City....-...I...... . I. 1) Authori-ration letter to Energise filed IX. LANDSCAPES (A) Commenced instA.N ation. •.... . ... ,,..,... ,..« ❑ (B) Completed installation... ...,. ❑ lCi Inspected..... .., . ««... .., . ,.,..,., d (D) Tentatively accepted by City.................. . p ! /� X. GENERAL AREA DRAINAGE (A) Building rain drains inspected....... ...... ,.. ❑ (B) Culverts inspected., ❑ (C) Drainage ditches inspected.................... ❑ (D) Tontntivel.y Accepted by City. .. ........a—,... O -/ / NOTE: PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF EACH CONSTRUCTION PHASE, REVIEW FILE TO INSURE COMPLETION OF CHECK L[ST AND FILING OFi 1) Approved Plan Revisions 2) Approved Specification Variances 3) change Orders/Extra Work Orders 4) All Correspondence/Memo-, 5) Daily Inspectinn Sheets MIMI oF hola 5 QA