Loading...
11190 SW NOVARE PLACE w w w w w w 11190 SW 140VARE PLACE 4J c� 0 . u a) H co 0 z 3 u7 C_J rn I I w w w w w rw CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COMMISSION I. Concerning Case Number(s): V 8-85 2. Name of Owner: PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 3. Name of Applicant:_ City of Tigard Address 12755 SW Ash Ave. City Tigard State OR Zip 97223 14. Location of Property: Address SW Novare Ct. , public right-of-way in front of lots 39, 40, & 41 . Tax Map and Lot No(s). 2S1 3DB 5. Nature of Application: For a variance from Sec. 18. 164.070 of the Community Dev. Code, which requires that sidewalks 5e constructed to City Standards. 6. Action: Approval as requested X Approval with conditions Den Lal 7. Notice: Notice wls published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant & owners = Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON May 17, 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. A eal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 which proNides that a written appeal. may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 PM May 17, 1985 10. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639-4111. (0257P) �WJLWJLWKWa. x�) City of Tigard Planning Commission Final Order No. 85-09 PC A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, WHICH APPROVES AN APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE (V 8-85) REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD. The Tigard Planning Commission received the above application at a public hearing on April 16, 1985. The Commission based its decision on the facts, findings, and conclusions noted below: A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Variance V 8-85 REQUEST: For a variance from Section 18.164.070 of the Community Development Code which requires that sidewalks be constructed to City standards. The variance, if approved, would allow the requirement for sidewalks in front of lots. 39, 40, and 41 on SW Novare Ct. to be -Takved. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESii,NATiON: Public Right-of-Way, Low Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: Public Right of Way, R-4.5 (Residential 4.5 units/acre). APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: Same (Public Right-of-way) 12755 SW Asti Ave. Tigard, (. --egon 97223 LOCATION: SW Novare Court , public rigt.t- of-way in front of lots 39, 40, and 41, Washing!.on County Tax Map 2SI 3DB 2. Background Public Improvement plans were issued for construction for Genesis II on September 6, 1978 subject to conditions. Sidewalks were required on the west side of Novare Court. Construction of the homes on SW Novare Court took place from April 1979 through 1982. During construction, the City allowed the homes to be built without sidewalks. As a result residents have incorporated the portion of the public right-of-way designated for sidewalks into their ;,ards. The three affected property owners have petitioned the City to have the requitements for sidewalks in front of their homes waivad. 3. Vir-.aity Information All of the surrounding properties are zoned R-4.5. All of the lots except one on SW Novare Court have single family homes on them with landscaped yards. SW Novare Court is approximately 250 feet 1 ng and ends in a cul-de-sac. There are 12 lots with direct access onto SW Novare Court. FINAL ORDER NO. 85-01PC - V 8-85 Page 1 .r IW t 4. Site Information The east side of SW Novare Court is too steep to accommodate sidewalks so none were required on that side as a condition of development. The west side of. SW Novare Court is less steep in front of lots 40 and 41, however, the grade is fairly steep at the corner of lot 39 and SW Genesis Loop. The residents of lots 39, 40, and 41 have landscaped to the curbs on SW Novare Court. 5. Agency and NPO Comments NYU # 3 rev red the request at their April 15, 1985, meeting. The Engineering Division supports `.he variance request. Comments were not received from the Building Division or the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, and 12; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.3; and Chapter 18.134 and 18.164 of the Community Development Code. The Planning Commission concludes that the proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the following findings: a. Statewide Planning Goal # 1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens Involvement program including review of all development applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NFO). In addition, all public notice requirements were met. b. Statewide Planning Goal # 2 is met. because the City applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City Ccmpreh,inaive Plan Policies and Development Code requirements to the application. C. Statewide Planning Goal # 12 is satisfied because the City has adopted policies and standards to ensure r, safe and efficient street and roadway system. The Planning Commission has determined that the variance request is warranted in that it is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based on the findings noted below: (a) flan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Otgan.ization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. FINAL ORDER NO. 85-01 PC - V 8-85 Page 2 wwi ww ww W wwr ww ww (b) Plan Policy 8.1.3. is not satisfied becav:de the condition to construct sidewalks in front of lots 39, 4C, at.d 41, of SW Novare Court has not been met. This condition may n^t have been practical however, in that the sidewalk would not come-lete an existing sidewalk system and the ton.jgraphy at the corner of SW Genesis Loop and SW Novare Co-.trt may be too steep to accommodate .a sidewalk improvement. The Planning Commission has determined that the variance request i.a consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings noted below: a. Chapter 18.134 of the Code includes five criteria (Section 18.134.050) for granting a variance. Those criteria are as follows: (1) The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purpose6 of this code, be in conflict with the policies of the comprehensive plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; (2) There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other, circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district. ; (3) The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this code and city standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible, while permitting some economic use of the land; (4) Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adl ersely affected any more than would occur if the developmen,- were located as specified. in the code; and (5) The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. (Ord. 83-52 Exhibit A(part), 1983). Since the proposed sidewalk improvement would not complete an existing sidewalk system, the intent of policy 8.1.3. requiring the construction of sidewalks is not violated. In addition., the topography of the area might make sidewalk construction difficult. The use of the land would not be altered in any way by granting this variance. Pedestrian traffic will not be further affected by granting this variance since construction of sidewalks in front of lots 39, 40, and 41 would only connect to sidewalks on Genesis Loop. The City allowed the homes to be constructed and occupied prior to construction of the sidewalks and residents have asked to have the condition waived. FINAL ORDER NO. 85-9#JPC - V 8-85 Page 3 C. DECISION Based .ipon the above findings and conclusions the Planning Commission approves Variance V 8-85 subject to the following condition: 1. Ali land dedicated as public right-of-way shall remain as public right-of-way including that portion originally intended for sidewalk improvements. It is further order that the applicant be not '.fied of the entry of this order. PASSED: This 6th day of _ flay 1985, uy the Planning Commission of the City of Tigard JL- Bonnie Owens, Vice President Tigard Planning Commission 1303P FINAI. JRDER NO. 85-_!IFC - V 8-85 Page 4 V 511 � �N �.,� r ,„'" 2, s .!tm.,,2•`s, .>'•i+. :y�yr '•$ •fii1. .(ti '4 ,Qjw." '�. .�,� {J ✓mss AO s. aJart a h eB t +♦ f` u:�{„ o. t, ? '+ �, «, hf ry as i PAw. "�, r v;/ i.•• a f. .F IUt' �i fH'tTl ►. e'�!N a', v >tij"a-,tvfilip 41 �n� +9i wiMyi' `;+Htp.l n;t 'n! ` - ti 4; .u� ti 4.3 Az ' Cpl •.a ) Lr 1 �' ;7'�i '::� � � ^�• yeytt y E••� •C N Ln .lt tt• 4-3 t° bc NO roo E, 1 s 1t r W o trjtg . .c a �4. Lo �► En w CL r• ., C to n. x tt 4"k 3 0 ..,.. _ ,� rus+.+��w •i.`�. .. - -. .. Vie'...-'_' ........ .`.,... � - � �' ':<t,��" ' J•r �int � ,Y' ..Yp y,�`,L' ' ` I ^.+l,'j_ � ,I'1 f���t".�q .,�U.�.. ,a� -'+] ��'f��.`7��ifi� -+(�� ^;t�j=�.,'j1�"lli:�"'`.�tN ei�t'��y�, ~+�` F� ` '• 1 �IW q .: 1 tr is Ih 7 ! ;. ► 1!. t4 itr�•wir►K.� t t.• ht ,i �'�,: .,If. � Nt ��,,.o• t � � tt� .i... .q►W. 't+-4�. �'`/ CITY OF TIGARD BLDG. DEPT. 12420 S.W. MAIN STREET TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE 639.4171 CONTRACTOR: Pursuant to Sections) of the Uniform Building Code, the following item(s) require correcting: Date: .i�.��-- y<ti� _ Permit W._ Inspecfor -- ,� CALL FOR REINSPECTION I CITY OF TIGARD BLDG. DEPT. 12420 S.W. MAIN STREET TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE 539.4171 i r I CONTRACTOR. 111 Pursuant. to Section(s) Of the Uniform Building Code, the �. following item(s) require correcting: Date:�3:= 5. — Permit No. - -- - Inspectaf--;--1--^-- ��l CALL FOR REINSPECTION CITY OF TIGARD BLDG. CREPT. 12420 S.W. MAIN STREET TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE 639.4171 CONTRACTOR: Pursuant to Section(s) of the Uniform Building Code, the following item(s) require correcting: LJ it f }Zo:� 8 �'F 'Py sTs Date: /I l� �� Permii No. Inspector CALL FOR REINSPECTION w w w w w w eae esr I BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TIGARD MANN T. MOX„ ^.'. PLUMBING PEIRMIT N° 4829 N. E. U Pi I I !`,' 2_24-1 109 holder of a valid plumbing contractors license is hereby authorized to cause plumbing work as herein noted to be installed in accordance with the plumbing code of Tigard. Such installations require inspection by the City Inspector who shall be notified not less than four (4) hours prior to the time the installations are ready for inspection. City of Tigard Business License required for all gnttractors and subcontractors, Owner hL'"�'2(' �� �� Aid Job ii�90 s y1% �z..�z r i.( �_ i d 1 r—— — �— —_ --- —� Date_ 7 TYPE OF PERMIT NUMBER OF TOTAL ITEMS FEE ON EACH AMOUNT R_S_D_E N T LqI_ y ----^---..- Single Family-1 bath-each Duplax-Each t bath unit 25.00 Additional bathrooms-each Mobile Home Space-each _ -- _15.00 ---���'---- --_ INDIVIDUAL FIXTURES C-Qi;;FM RCIA t to 50 Fixtures in 1 building-each 3.00 51 to 100 Fixtures in_1 building—each — — ; --._ 2.50 _ 101 to 200 Fixtures in 1 building—each 2.00 �— :'01 or more Fixtures in 1 buildin -each _�__ ~�- MISCELLANEOUS ----- - - i ` Sewer-each additional 100 ft— 10.00 'Nater Service to building _ 5.00 - rOther S ecir - PERMIT 67) Fo Plumbing Inspection Phone 6394171 o State o Plumbing ContractonrAI P.crclpr nln t. —A Q„ '—.""" A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION cf,fv T1CARD _,re— ZZ _ ,9,� X9 .2 ?33 THE UNDFRSIGtiEO HEREBY APPLIES Fon A PERI IIT FOP, THS 70ORK HEREIN INDICATED SUI LO ERP-,o1.; OR AS SHO`::N AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CVVNZP.PH;Drl, LoTNo JOB ADl;4_SS 1p �1�L_SfL:_ L+ C, Ir A!�CHI TECT 8U11_Dc14 SQ ,� AOO�es; ENGINEER STRUCTURE FiE,on 0EL —' ❑AOOIr_ION ❑nyAIi1`-" 0FIE)JEYiAL _ ❑F18E DA'1AOE L7DEMOLIr1� 1 rIESIpENCE CCOMw.1 ❑EDUCATIONAL ❑GOV'T 11FIELIGIOU5L]PAr10 [_ICAAPORr ❑GARAGE ❑SrORAGECILAa CiFEN^E O!CUPAfJCY• ��_LANO USE 20M1J= R—'yry SLOG_rYPEc `� //��Y��='+___ _.!1_.FIRE Z(7NE� PLAN CHECK BY S SIE E R p E R f1 T T S ----_-- -- — ARF� NO�EOROQL� I F �`pfl�JO 9UILDIM1t, LIEpAArhleNr *"`-- SE TRACKS FROM r A0 ;IEAR .24 LEF 7 SIDE RIGHT SInE „2 Q Pel-mit - - "-- THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZGNINC C � A1tn heck U REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICAGLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HERESY `.CREED THk, THE f _ AORK WILL BE NONE IN ACCUROANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATION5:,N0 IN CG+,IPLI;.NrE Y:IHE l ill 5.10ta1 �i`//��4 30 ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT rT . l_.._ DOES NO Y/AltZ RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, CONTRACTOR AND 5U8 CO?!TRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUbINESS Sate Tax //Z.. LICENSE. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER, PLUMBING AND HEATING. I Tota! SUC roc " � APPLI,;ArI r OR AGEN t -- - — Appruvec Rece pt No AtnaE t5 Ht7NE S0C - 40 POC L _ / 00 SEWER CONNECTION $ (o O0 ' SEWER INSPECTION $ Z� SEWER SURCHARGE_ $ r Comments : I Ij -17-79 ._f-rA"Ar+•�rn�`v'.�'��;7�*^/-►.vr----_,-,..'*'o'—r'TM'o"'•+,y►r... �► w/+r+ov��r-a----.nom.. �r+,r.�Yr--�r,S�ir�i)r'•-'+�-W ^�"�'4 ���'!J`� I Ej BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION cOF TIGARD DATE__ �,ta_ ' —??11, THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR APERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUILDER PHONE OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OWNCp,-IJQN� LOT NO.- OWNER O.OWNER IIUIf�ItiN k_+T+Jd• E Xt1C• JOB ADDRESS �1.k t k HOME ADDRESS ARCHITECT ENGINEER BUILDER r-�lsame ADDRESS rIESIGNF'R�-1 _ STRUCTURE ^^ONEW_ QRFMODEL DADOITION El REPAIR _ LIRENEWAL []FIRE DAMAGE [:]DEMOLITION L,,,) RESIDENCE CICOMM ❑EDUCATIONAL DGOV'T ❑RELIGIOUS[-]PATIO ❑CAR PORT GARAGE 'JSTORAGE SLAB IrFENCE �DBOND [:]MOVING ❑CONDITIONAL USF _Q#E.SIGN REVIEW ❑COUNCIL APPROVED �OSIGNS _ OCCUPANCY LAND USE ZONE .BLDG.TYPE.._- _YIRE ZONE— PLAN CHECK BY—���_ HEAT unstrruct sinuis family duall.inr� w/n>ctaat;hsd �,jera(-a. � Hrc'xauAns -- 2 Uetht„ .°AF LORRECTIUN 5111 E f ATTALK l.l. Ain, f hf1 1f3 1 i0U�, i i'`')130000. occ,�QqQ_` Fl.9QH�9Ap_ HEI_QHT .- .W STQB-1U AREA-- _ __d9�.E�R�?4MS VALl,�1`' _ BUILDING DEPARTMENTa0 SET BACKS FRONT 2u REAR 26 LEFt SIDE ���"' RIGHT SIDE Permit 'W103•0U THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING Plan Check �n REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES ANO OPOINANCES, AND IT IS HEREPY AGREED THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE C;4 ACCORDANCE WITH THE PIANS AMU SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH Subtotal R4, 0 ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSJ4NCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE -- RESTR;CTIVE COVFNANTC. CONTRACTOR AND SU9 C,ONTPACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS State Tax 'I ""1 ? LICENSE. SEPARATE PERMITS REOUIRED FOR SEWER, PLUMBING AND HEATING, Total FIW- #1 $100.00 By _ P1 ---- _.__ —_ --------._ t+' APPLICANT OR A(iF.NT �..-. Approved - Receipt No. -3 ' r tlt � w awe alt't tal tao� +z� �Ie 7 DATE INSPP, TYPE INSPE-TION REMARKS PLUMBING DATE --- - � -------�-- - - Contractor s:' I n f /�.f�► - --- Permit No. ate- T 7 w�_00 Rough in � ------- - ---------- --- Fixture ----- /l- gigs 1430 O~ ----- --- --- Final —_-_ "�-1 1 Olt^j/%gy4 1/ HEATING Contractor Permit No. - /O 3- 3i !=�_ 11 ct. ''N/i�_ s noK.Ct Gas or Oil -- -- — -- t/•/•� Rough-in —- jdL_A_j--_ e),k�._ ——_ —. — -- ---- - Final — _—_e�---- - SEWER — -- ---- ----- Final — -- — DRIVEWA Filial StorMt Drainage. (Rain Drain)Final Sidewalk Curb&Street Final Approach BLDG. DEPT. FINAL TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OCCUPA C Final— — CERTIFICATEOCCUPANCY �`` --- 7" Landscaping Zoning Final /<I :.rOCA 7/ (11 I o S o �csv a.r� Cf Aarm d Ginsc ao c /fain FLuer� 14- 2 4 ¢2' Q12 G-4 � s-i 33 Ca a z.Z. x /G -/0 3va 2t- 15 x f•Z rrz ! � s8, MWKWALW li g w w .-. � S3.QG City of Tigard Mechanical Permit Permit 2�'� -(�' ' N,nv Installation )U Replace U Relocation ❑ Addition EJ Alteration [j '� W.state TOTAL CONTRACTOR Imperial Mech. OWNER_ Moore Brothers, Inc. 4532 SF 63rd o 11190 SW Navare Ct:. ADDRESS, _ WORK ADDRESS! Por.tTan_cc ;Orego � Irnperi T Mec�- PHONE_ APPLICANT-------.--- H-at Input Rating (B U er^ _ our►_.__106`, 000 Vent Size v Flue Stze FUEL OIL ❑ GAS 4�j ELECT ❑ OTHER_ ITEM NO. FEE ITEM NO. FEE For Issuance of Permit__ i _3.00 _Air Condition Compressor 15 to 30 HP - 10.00_ F New- Under 100,000 BTU_� 4.00 _ Air Handling 10,000 CFM _ 3.00 New 100,000 BTU &over 5.00 Air Handling Over 10,000 CFM-^ _5.00 Floor Furnace _ 4.00 Evaporative_Cooler _- 3.0 Nall • Floor -Suspended _ 4.00 Range Vent Fan _ 2.00 Install Vents Only _ ^ _ 2.00 _ Vent System_ _ 3.00 Repair Heat& Cooling 4.00 Hood Commercial_ _ 300 Condition Compressor _Under 3 HP 4,00 Commercial Duct System ^_ u 10.00 A Condition Compressor 3 to 15 IJP 7.50 1NSPE"TOR'S COMMENTS——— CITY OMMENTS-_,_ —CITY BUSINESi I ICENSE REQUIRED FOR ALL CONTRACTORS OR SIJB-CONTRAC199S APPROVED BYDATE ISSUED 13Y. ,- DATE RECEIPT NO. _ :,. _ __- . __..._-.__..._. �_.-... _„_....._......._._..._...... Signature of Applicant