Loading...
10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE-9 ADDRESS: 1�3 SO w Cras�aa0� i:\records\microflm\targets\building.doc RD f:ER7I F'I SATE' Or �.._ CITY OF TIGA OCCUPANCY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PERMIT #. . . . . . . i DUP0,4­0l 1 c 13125 SW I1a11 Blvd.Tbard,Orojo,y 97223o6i99 (603)d30-41 i'1 DATE I SSUC PJ, 01 /,09,,96 PARCEL: 1 S 1,35SA--0 '800 S I TF ADDIIEGG,. . . ; 10380 SW CASCADE. BLVD SUBDIV.ISION. . . . a 7ON7NGirj BLOCK. . . . . . . . . . a LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 C.;LASS OF' WOPK. o ADD TYPE OFF' USB:. . . :Coll OCCUPANCY GRP. :3N OCI.UWANC:Y LOAD: 231 117W)N'f NAME.. . . a BCAVERTON HONDA Romer-kg .- Construct ,a two--Sor•y addition to the existAng building, LAN1""H RC ENTERPRISE".;, INC. 10"ffw)5 SW BROADWAY BEAVErRT ON OR 97005 Phone #a 643- 5577 MQKRI5Oh SUILMNO 9160 GE l_AWNF I ELD RD CL.ACKAMAS OR 97015 Phone #s 653-2514 Rog #. . t 63004 Occupancy of the alcove referenced 1--rildi is ner•eby giver), And c.er-tifi.e-; the compl ianco with the 5t .tp Of Or 9Uon raVed ty Codes fo- the grokAp, vccl.IEr;ancy, anti rlr a Under~ which the ref erea-r^mit 1-i S�_teC1. _,F�C .T(�)Ft AAi BUFFICw POST IN (�UNr'-)ICUOUS PLACE i ti CITY-OF TI ARD CERTIFICATE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PE:RP)IT #. . .. . . . . i BUP")4 -1b I L' ba 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 97223*8199 (503)039-4171 DATE 135UEDs 01/64' ")6 PARCCLA lsi:�.JbA c41TE ADDRESS—,. : 1030,121 514 CASCADE E%LVD 81.181)1 V 15 1 ON. . . . I z 0,\If 111(-w;- T. -r.-, BLOCK. . . . . . . . . . I LOT. . . . . . CLASS OF' WORK. zADD TYPk OF USE. --COM 0(:*:CUP(4NCy ORP. 43N 0LX.VPo-)NCY LOAff's i?31 TENANT t44M1--. sBEAVERTON HONDA Pmmmt*% g Construct ip two-story ad0ition to the exi ?--ting bmilcilnj4. I-ANPHERE r-IN17UPPRISC-S, INC. il-14312115 sw BROADWAY PERVENTON CIP 07005 Phom-a #1 64-3-50577 Lo n t;v-aot or s - MORRISON BUILDING 9160 EsE LAWNFIEUD NO LACK PMABP fill? 970115 Phone Reg 0- 1 63004 OccupAncv of thp aticive referenced '%--mJ1diTi4 it hereby MiVeTl, Anti COI-tjfj� the compliance with the State Of Ovegan 3�Guia -ty Codes fat, the group, us oncipt t-.hich tl►,p rpflui-e :,ed, ev-01t DILL I LN6 OFF1 P074T IN CUNSPIGUOUS PLACE CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Busines, Phone: 639-4171 Inspection: Footing Snsp. Ceiling Sprink. Rough-ir, Appr/Sdwlk Foundation Plbg. Underslab Mech, Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in FINAL AI 1'Itii51l 17 Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer Gas Line I ; TIC0r% Plbq. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing -Plumb. 'alarm Water Line Insulation -Mech. Underilr. Insul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. Elect�.,,,U Tit1+-_-, Date Requested: 1 7(/1 _– Time: AM Z j PM I Address:103���s Crime' 21VQ Builder: 78 `/— 09 2– 3 Permit THE FOLLCWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: WVTING REQUEST<� Please... I& -- ❑ Read Tn: ❑ Handle -- I ❑ ApproveI _ And... ❑ Forward i��._ Ste` Rett-IM , [�] o OSS U '2 Keep – ❑ Review with Me — �7'..e; Post-it®7884 O 31I 1994 I:7PPROVED r: DatP:!—�.L_�2 _ —DISAPPROVED —APPROVED SUBJECI TO ABOVE —Call For Reinsp. Carlson Testing, Inc. ' -/� 9s - 171 rP.G. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 PROECT —Phone(503)(503)684-3460 FAX N 684-0964 u.tJPf'-�/1 HQn.f�� LOCAVON -- — -- - CONTRACTOR OWNFA TO -- ---- -- - - -- WEATNER 'FMr at AM PRESENT AT SITE THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTEC. LY --- - ----- pe r• 4,.Jt2 /-Ile r - ------ rew7'q e7'I i jen� /—/' gy p-. ra t r70_n-eo plI Qrt -- - I u.��s. _ wc��- _Dn T _t e4,A red "J'A . �r' COPIES TO -- -- _ � EFE!LID IL—KILE!_l 0ITU7 SIGNED /'f�KC / Information contained herein i, not to he reproduced,except in full, without prior authorization from this nffic Construct+nn Inspection&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Special Inspection Tgard, Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684.3460 FAX (503)684-0954 FINAL, SUMMARY REPORT May 2.2, 1995 #94-1177 Morrison Buildinv Co 9160 SE Lawnfield Road Clackamas, OR 97015 Attn: Steve Morrison Re: Beaverton Honda Building 10380 SW Cascade Avenue -" Tigard, Oregon Ge:itlemen: This is to certify that the items listed below are in accordance with Section 306 of the State Building Code, we have performed random/periodic special inspection at the contractor's request of the following items per our inspection reports only: Reinforced Concrete Structural Steel - Field Epoxy Bolting Structural Masonry All inspections and tests were performed and reported according to the requirements of Section 306 and, to the best of our knowledge, the work was in conformance with the approved plans and specifications, approved change orders and applicable workmanship pro-,risions of the State Building Code and Standards, as well as the structural engineer's design changes and approvals . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSO TESTING, INC Douglas W. Leach President mbh cc: City of Tigard SERA Architects TM Rippey Consulting Engineers Constnrcttor Inspection&Related Tests C arl.son Testing, Ines Geotechnical Consulting P.U. Box 23814 'Tigaru,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-346,j FAX(503)684-0954 May 19 , 1995 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: May 18 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS -, 10380 Sod Cascade Avenue -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: M. McHargue 4614 ' 05- 18-94 : CTI representative was present at job site. Per the attached two letters , the remaining item 41 on our non- compliance list is completed. Garcia Welding has stated to the structural engineer ' s ,atisfaction that the welds in question are in fact partial penetration gelds . This completes all structural steel and welding inspections required with acceptable results . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full. , without prior authorization from this office . If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . Resvect.t ully subm' ted, CAT<L- T STING, NC . u las Wj Leach Pr siden't i---Km: a k cc : Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard SERA Architects TM Rippey Consulting Engineer 1177,60().1 INSPECT,,10 TYPE + Report of In�pection Department of Consumer& Business Services I, I e I �N o• Building Codes Division, Elevator Section 1535 Edgewater St. NW,Salem,OR 9731:1 (503) :37:3-1298: Billing..(503) 373-76'�' ;,-AES" DAIDe MS , SATISFACTORY INSPF.CTION LANPEM BNTRI'RI$MS #190 t :M'1'46A •. � (Z UNSATISFACTORY INSPECTION 12510 91 004 91' 'r CD INSPECTION REOUIREMENTS ONLY RRAVEATON, !+k 81405- IBA 1 u. CD PROVISIONAL PERMIT ISSUED: EXPIRATION DATL 23Pr. rtrttlf FLevATUR +1)tPOkATlnli (if 610MI (P ACCIDENT INSPECT!ON • + e • • • ► ELEVATOR INFORMATION (D FIRE SERVICE IESI IS OVERDUE NY+i. til(t1A1, I1100, MINN NNI' M) ANNUAL SAFETY TEST IS OVERDUE (11) (0 ® (aD7(D (D CAPACITY 10,90x, LAN01#0 (QD FIVE YEAR FULL LOAD TEST IS OVERDUE (CO (3) CI) ® Cl) "ODI! DATE 9114S N4,10MI''r{'+ (R, RESHACKLE OF CABLE(S)IS OVERDUE (D (M Cr (0 i (M TEST AND SEAL RELIEF PRESSURE VALVE ,w (3) CT) (0 (M CHANGE HOSE BETWEE14 PUMP UNIT AND JACK LW CI) CD 0) (T) (1+ (0 INSTALL FIRE SERVICE SIGNS (IID a) (5) (SID OD M INSTRUCTIONS ® EMERGENCY LIGHT/BELL IS INOPERATIVE (m C3) aD ® CID ru MNTACT 0.") 74 HOUR COMMUNICATION DEVICE 15 INOPERATIVE (M (7) a) (0) CD Cfl rZ PHOTO EYE IS INOPERATIVE 0) CA) (E) (N (1) CID (ID SECURE CARTOP EXIT FROM CA9 TOP (IID (1) (7) (ED CID C;C CID ELEVATOR PIT IS NOT CLEAN/DRY G3) CID % CM ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM HAS UNRELATED STORAGE CID (7D CID CAD AND/OR HOISTWAY GLASS IS NOT PROPERLY MARKED PRIOR INrPECT4ON (T1J BUILDING AND/OR MACHINE ROOM IS NOT ACCESSIBLE RP.(.11llti'NEN?fi N+NF CiID 1T --- --- - -- ------ --- UID + "!J� (DO) U. M CD QM 40 'DW i i (3.) ' (� db C'D ✓�.JI LL ����_t, C1.uJ�---1 �'r, ® ® REOUIRFMENT WORK SHALL BE CORRECT':D WITHIN DAYS. CID CB) (ID (ifID q (3ID - � C�) 1 CeD CTJa 4 — •o-253tf+3 iee irnMi9,n,i+AN k&ATO*ItVHIOH HA!CAUSED AN INJURY SHALL NOT BE OPERATED NTIL APPROVED BY THE ELEVATOR SWnON•PER CAS 400.044(8) al+lO. ER COPY Inspection Result Instructions Please read carefully! If the result fair the annual inspection is satisfactory: This conveyance meets minimun, safety standards. No further action is required. The new elevator permit will he sent to the site address providing all fees arr,paid If the result for the annual inspection is Unsatisfactory: This conveyance failed to mi ct the minimum safety standards as required by State Law.The responsible party is obligated to comely with the. requiremews as indicated by this report within ninety (90) days Froin date of this 4.inspection. A site inspection will be reauircd after Ilic 90 day period has lapsed.(See Fir., Re-itlspe:tion Below.) Written verincation of compliance will not be accepted for unttatlxfactory Inspections. Inspection, requirements only This conveyance failed to meet file minimum safety standards as required by State law.The responsible party Is ClbUgated to comply � with the requirements as indicated !y thi report livithiu sixty (60)days from date of this inspection. Written verification will be accepted when all items are complete. Failure to provide wriner notice within sixty (60)days will cause the inspection status to change to unsatisfactory and result in a re-inspection. Written verification of compliance will he accepted file this Inspection resilit only. Provisional permit issued (New installations only.)This conveyance is granted a provisional permit until the expiration date indicated.The conveyance may he opctated under the conditions set forth by this inspection.Coutractor is required to correct violations prior to the expiration date. Contractor is required to request a re-inspection prior to the permit expiration date.iNailure to do so may result In fines or civil penalties. Accident This conveyance was reported as being involved in an accident.This unit may not he relnrnr l lw:rry ice until all items indicated by the inspector',,report are corrected and the unit is rcinspr_cv-d by this agency. This.Fonveyance may not he returned to se;-vice without the authorization of the state Section. First re-inspection A first re-inspection will follow ninety(90)days after the initial annual insn, .i:oti. It viul,itiuns 5ull exist uitcr Ilrc tical is inspe-0lon the responsible party shall have an additional thirty(30)days to comply. Second re-inspection A second re-inspection will follow thirty(30)days after the first re-inspection.if violations stall exist after the second re-inspection the responsible party shall have an additional thirty(30)days to comply. Third re-Inspection (final) A third re-inspection will follow thirty (30)days after the second re-inspection. If,violations Still exist ea the third and final re- inspection the elevator will be disconnected from service. y Letters of compliance will not be accepted for these inspections. There will he a fee charged for each re-inspection as required by law. Variances and Appeals Variances An owner or owner's representati ve may request a variance from the Elevaior Safety Section for any or all of the items on this report. Fwh rcauesl fora variance shall be in writing and must either demonstrate alicn,ate inetho ds cf achieving the safety tequirements or vault reasow. fur not complying with the conditions of this report. Provide any current supporting documentation with the request. )'ou will receive a response within thirty(30)days from receipt of your request.Note: Variances granted will he site. pecitl a and not transfer•ble to any other elevator.Votionces are svbject to periodic review under applicable codes. Appeals (DRS 4,50.155)An owner has the right to appeal an ad%crw ruling of the Elevator Safety Section to the State Electrical/Elevator Safety Poard. Appeals must be in writing and will he presented to the hoard. You will tie notified as to the time and place of the Aceting should you wish to appear. All fees must be paid in full prior to issuance of an operating permit. T y� 9221 S.W.Wrbur Blvd,Suite 105 TM RlPkY Portland,Oregon 97219 1 jx1 CONSULTINC ENGIrr>ER5 Phone.(303)2444266 Fax(503)24+0191 May 17, 1995 Carlson Testing, Inc. Attention: Douglas Leach P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Beavertnn Hnndn Project Number: 94024.07 Dear Doug. It is our understanding that all items as noted on your non-compliance list of welded connections with the exception of item number 1 have been resolved and noted on the list. Please find the enclosed letter from C.ee Garcia of Garcia-Nettleton Steel Specialties dated May 15, 1995 regarding this item. With this letter and your reports, we are satisfied that all of the non-compliance hems have been resolved. 11 you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, �PR/j Ralph Turnbaugh, P.P. �� w 18720 UP Er)N RT/s' 'li1 y Y�0 A Enclosures U� _CXPIRE5; cc: Steve Baarstad, Morrison PonStruction Jane Barker, SERA Architects • RECEIVED MAY I C 1995 Garcia-Nettleton Steel Specialties CONSUNIN0'EN6iNEERS 91OU SL Lawnfield Rd Clackamas, OR 97015 503 659-9505 May 15, 1995 Mr. Ralph Turnbaugh T.M. Rippey C insulting Engineers 9221 SW Darbur Blvd., Suite 105 .Portland, OR 97219 Subject: AEavertoa Honda Motorrycle Tigard, Oregon Dear Mr. Turnbaugh: The welds at the column caps and bases at Beavetion Honda Mototcycle Addition were prepared and fabricated in our shop. The drawings called for 1/4" fillet weld, it is our understanding that a number of these welds appear slightly undersize. The column tubes wore prepped with 3116" to 1/4"bevels prior to welding to the plates, increasing the effective penetration, and therefore meeting or exceeding the required weld, If you should have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, Lee oaT cc: Steve f3aarstad, Morrison Crinonrction N14Y 13.1995 11 15Ynr - _ CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 3usiness Phone: 639-4171 Inspect on: -vCL( '1 __2/ 41� Footing Susp. Ceiling Sprink. Rough-in Appr/Sdwik Foundation, Plbg. Underslab Mach. Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct, Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in �, I1��_ Post/Beam Mach. San. Sewer Gas Line Bldq Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing Alarm Water Line Insulation ec Underfir. Insul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect. Date Requested: 5 ( Time: AM PM Address: Builder:_ `7 �� Permit : CLU THE FOLLOVI ING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: 7* All .r' L /tet/�Cr - Inspector._ _APPROVED _DISAPPROVED ____APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE Lull For Reinsp. CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE /� Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 13391-41 1 Inspection: Footing Susp. Ceiling Sprink. Rough-in Appr/Sdwik Foundation Plbg. Underslab MPch. Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Slruci. Plbg. Top Out Fle:. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing cam"-Plumb Alarm Water Line Insulation -MG0. Underflr, Insul, Shear Wall Gyp, Bd. Elc,. Date Requested: S �� Time:4, AM _ PM Address: Builder: Permit #: THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspector: -- �f _ Date: PROVED ,DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE _Call For Reinsp. .rte Construction Inspection&Related Tests Gait son 'Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting F.O. Bc)x 23814 Tigzfd,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 April 13 , 1995 FAX(503)684-0954 94-1177 P.O. 4C08884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: April. 12, 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: 10380 SW Cascade Avenue - - Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: R. Steele #639 04-12-94 : CTI representative was present at job site to provide visual inspection on non-compliance items . From the items dated 4:3-95 by M. McHargue (CTI) , items number. 3 , 4 , 10 , 1.1 , and 22 have been resolved anu noted on the non- compliance .list. Item number 1 on this A.ist needs further involvement by M. McHargue. i The above listed item; are acceptable and signed off per engineer' s with TMR (verbal from contractor) . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Informeti.or. contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorizatic,n from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . Resile Lfully su fitted, C^. L N ST N- . o 1gl.as V1. Leach P es�ident RS :ak cc: Morrison building Co. City of Tigard SERA Architects TM Rippey Consulting Engineer CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Line (ilec-O-Phone): 639-41;'¢ Business Phone. 639-4171 Inspection:_ Footing Susp. Ceiling Sprink. Rough-in App,/Sdwlk Foundation Plbg. :Jnderslab Mech. Ro-iyh-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in FINAL: I Pcst/Beam Merh. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing -Plumb. Alarm Water Line Insulation -Mech. Underflr. Insul. Shear Mall yp. -Elect. i Once Requested: p /� _Time: /ASM X XPM Address: l /,_z� O C.' C �C- /L�.�Lzz Builder:_ Permit #66,_ THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION 33 A-,F- REQUIRED: Inspector:__,, _ Date: I�PPRO'VEn DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE _Call For Reinsp. �TVAC INCOHPOHATE10 April 10, 1995 City of Tigard P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: SMOKE DETECTORS IN EQUIPMENT OVER 2000CFM Beaverton ionda Tigard, rE gon Attn: George In reference to the '1991' UMC Code Book, Section 1009, the exception to the requirement of the need for a smoke detector is open to interpretation. The new'1994' UMC Code Book, Section 608, exception 42 is precise in interpreting that. .. "when all occupied spaces have direct acess(within 100)to an exit to the exterior of the building, an automatic smoke shutoff in the supply will not be necessary." Based on the 1994 UMC revisions, we ask for a re-evaluation of this code compliance, and acceptance of Honda Showroom. Sincerely, Lee Loebe LL/sr 815 S E SHERMAN PORTLAND,OREGON 97414 (503)2394822 FAX(503)239-6555 CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Line (Rec-O-Pho e): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection: Footing Susp. Ceiling S,rink. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Foundation PIbg. Underslab Mach. Rough-in Fireplace F ost/Beam Struct. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing -Plumb. Alarm Water Line Insulation -Mech. Underflr. In&ul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect. Date Requested: / d/ �J Time: AM PM Address:� ��,�,['� � z, Builder. Permit #: D/ Z THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: of Inspector:_—'c _ Date: C/.. /---A'P'PROVED _DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE _Call For Reinsp. CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE Inspec?ion Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection: 1�� 1 /j:L�• ooting Susp. Ceiling Sprink. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Foundation Plbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Fi,.place Post/Beam Struct. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfln+r Rain Drain Framing -Plumb. Alarm Water Line Insulation -Mech. Underflr. Insul. Shear Wall 11�y� -Elect. Date Requested: _Time._)LAM PM Address:_1 C i 3 o GCi -' - _ . Builder: —Permit THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspector: i _ _ Date: i Z-AP ROVED _DISAPPROVED —APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE __Call For RFinsp. Constn�wtton.inspection&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consultiny P.0. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 9728 Phone(503)6b4-3460 ':AX(50.41684-0954 April 4 , 1995 94-1177 P .O. 4008884 FIELD INSPEC`T'ION REPORT DATES COVERED: Apr:.l 4 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue - - Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: M. McHargue 4614 C4-04-94 : CTI representative was pl:esent on site to meet with contractor and fabricators to discuss the non-compliance items. Per the 3-14-95 letter from TMR Engineering (the str_ucLu.ral Engineer' s field observations) several items have been removed from c.he non-compliance list. See attached copy. The items that remain are the following: Item 1 , 3 , 4 , 10 , 1.1 , and 22 . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in Rill., without prior authorization from this office. Ii there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . Respectf/Leach mitted. C L N TESTI �NC . o glas zsident attachment Mak cc : Morrison Building Co. City )� Tigard SERA Architects TM Rippey Consulting Engineer W II to in in to W . , 0) I 0) 3) a)E• i�' i i i W i i i i fn rn 0 0 0 0 t•� L v � a rn rA v � b b �r r• E•, fr u � � a •r1 .� t� � a 44 u W En H Gmr-: r7 0 - O ci a --I �4 �4 �4 :4 o uaiu w a a H z, O rl O aC .y W U a) U O O O O A f3 TJ O O a U C; 0 4j r-I u) u) N w Q N U H :j r-1 a) "U 0414 a) ro ro rn ro ro o b = :j 41 r - H 310 o v r1 v H H r-4 (1) 44 1:� dW 44 (d �j A r-i •ri 4-) b a I~ �^ a o � (u �, A rr - _ u1 a.4 .. 3 U 3 4 ro a 3vo ZW UOQ( O !4 (143 v i-) 4-jr. lda ro H L Cb Cil a) 44 C~ O 1:: — O A rn r-1 - 4-1 X, r-I u1 G n �t N C) 0 41 J., ro - a v a) ro ro 'U 0 r ( a) (M G: ? 'o t�n •r{ r-4 ro r+ •r♦ g:, u) U r-, Ul r.. C: r- a) A .V v \•rI 3 D W H r-I r (n u) 1-1 JJ 44 3 r1 0 N C r1 ro ro b H �.] v •r1 T7 M :3:41 r1p 41 X ro r1 r1 I~ U " N W (A u) w x 3 a) -1 v 1~ ro 1010 Tl rl �4 wr-A v N v v 0 ro < 0) 'H 0 z x O .A a) .1.1 m G v r A -4v b44 9L to r4 u1 3 v u1 p ,Q •� N OCA t-I li � � O Ni) v3 > r. -i UO In [ (aa) b H (Tj V) U H v 0 O +) ro A ro ro - a u1 O 0 f 4 " 3 rl O a 1 w r-I 4-j a 4-4 4.1 V1 u �4 r� v O +) to H O a) 4 ro 4) .-4 C4 z H r-I O O (nr1 44 rO 0 -b4) v r. 4J r1 to +a L) • H a' O a -r1 v (., ro 10 P. 0 m -H Cj to -rA J-) U --I H O m 'C( N ro Uz U L" a (n = a) r-I a) q bu) u1 - moo • " :jv •ri rr ,q --1 ro Ell b to r i v A rd - r-I J-) " •cM 41 er U U Y4 4-4 co .11, U ul 44 M v v a) N v v v v mb u) ro v u 41 41 v v 44 r-I rA O a) c: A v c H a Ci r-1 r+ N ro v a) �4 !A •r-I -rl b ro b 0 .[� '0 rO 4-4 rn 'C7 -rA (u r1 a U q b ,-I v v m v 44 4.4 k9� r1 r-4 -1 U 0 H \ •r1 a) •r1 rl r1 bi E, v I. r-1 > 3 1J X, 0 v t;4 �4 41 r-, N 0 rO N U 1 44 F_: H v a -r1 !n -rA a) v H = r1 0)d tm J -rl 0) r-1 -A u1 u1 r1 'Ll, a 41 r-1 r A r-I v' r-I -4 c •cr ro [ u1 0 + b ro r! o W ro -,A d) I '-- ro3ao �4 o �4 rUrO �4 0 �4 I~ K = r i .Q U •r1 d U ro 4j > •r-1 • r-1 a) 4-J O K ,r. v -rA O -1 a) 0 •r' r+ 3 a) a) !~ a) 4-( u) .-1 v r( t� 4-J 0 0 $ O U a) O rJ (N � ro r+ 14 ro C a) O r+ H m N r1 )4 r-1 U rA r-I 0�1 A v ri ri U = v L) U 0 a) 4-1 _q 44 N - U u) '" b X: 4-4 v 3 ro �A 43 a) � EJ � �r1 v O 44 � � � a !� A -,q '0 T1 3 •1-+ -4 •a ra � � 'O c S-( 4-1 b 0 O > 0 v O v O [ O a) a) >, O O 4-) 1:1 r, r� a) r-1 q •rA I~ q O O •r+ oUC.' o4-) 14 U )4U P14 L) r-1 H4-40UlI N0X �AU (N 4-4 0 NUw3 x I~ O +) q (n to to tri Lr) to to >•+ W W rn am a) rn rn rn rn v F, E-4 > •d to r- r- r• r- (d A H ("`d N N N N N N m N N N N N N N O (D O C) C-) O CJ H U t-3 �•+ Z (--i , N �N) IVB /1 in l0 t� A W In ui ,n Ln (n (n W > rn rn (1 rn rn rn 40 �r r �r V �r � W ! , ! + a M rn N O O O O C7 O Ln Q1 V) ru �1 U) a� - ] v r- o< r1 E-4 � v a � w a a a b o a a a a a u to •• u v rr >4 > �4 H yO b N rd b rd ►4 x W O O O O O U 4- F W _ O a) v - v, b a •A �� H •-+ A 4-) r • Qr v U r-1 to H umb u x o i En a) 0 o x to a s� v 41 o v u rd rri Z Ccl + G .r. JJ rn 4-+ b U z: a) a) ri rd v H U ;s rd 0 \ F-: �:, w v 41 3 3 F `Ty G A C) O �j 0 0, C) rd a U) a V) O o r-1 r-4 r1 w ! to �4 �4 m 4 rA a F •7 • + a) 0 a ji ro rd rn v 4 t U r1 r-1 r14 z r-1 ii •r{ V) a) r-1 r-1 4-1 (•'+ 4j :j a z r n T U U -4 v 0 r-+ O O ul O 4-+ O td 4-4 O 0 0 H o x v u 3 41 r-1 x .r: �4 •r1 0 " p .[ V1 U F N O n7 �+ a) 0 N e w a arl� vv bre Nv v r. u 4 v0 [v H 0 4 F-: tnro > 41 a) a) Q, 41 >1 ry O ai 14 v 0 rd v 3 •r1 C.' 44 1:; rU �4 a) v L7 u :4 u 0 X., a) ti 44 v 4-4 r. -A O A a ` m c v P o 41 .Q r i 41 u rA o v a }4 rL1 a7 ) 41 m +L tow 4j u 3 0 -+ 0 a) Q rd O 3 rh O in (n a) a) O rU a) 4-r a) \ u, ro r! b r-1 r-I r{ a) 4 (d 4-1 In In \ •,A r-1 44 4.4 v G H d > m l 3 U w 'rj 44 r� u 14 0 C7 v rl rl v O +U a) v +n ro -4 )ti N 0 �4 r_, 4J � ►, to to � a) �4 C,' !4 � a) Q ri v -A r-1 O •11 41 O v O 14 0 U O x O A O a) X > �..' 4J I O 41 T.1 0 r-1 O .(ll O Q O O O -A a) rd (a r--1 F-: a) '0 r-1 O (1) -4 1.1 r-♦ ::j r-q r-1 r-1 Q —1 4-4 QO r•i �4 m 44 (0 4J a) V) 44 4 ,Q 44 4-4 0, 44 N 4-I 4-r 44 r-4 •r1 r1 4.1 U 0 ro v a) >r 3 En 3 iJ rd v rd ro O rA T1 b v a) b 10 r-'. ro 4-) b 'C' ro rCJ )~ 41 Q b F: O -Av 'r1 � � �c 'rI r� G r. 0 r. r. i. rd ro, O rdOv rl N J, in 3 m N 4-1 E+ V) N O v4 c: (N O N G N '1 41 U 4-) a 0 x r O Q In +n n In In in to to $-4 D!7 a7 s o, rn rn rn rn rn In > err c- r r r r r r rd A F 1 N N tV N N N N (14 rr) (N N N rV N N N N O O O CJ O C:) C) U 0 - - E 0) 1 0 F cn rn +c� N ri -3 +n A W Ln In n In Ln In W > rn rn cn rn rn am H $4 I 1 I 1 1 f< O d1 NP - dr dl Q t/) N r-♦ rl r-I ,-4 W I I I I 1 1 tYi N M M M M M O O O O O O to Ln b QI a) b U) �4 � •ri a o a to �4 44 �•I 1 a) .e U O H to 4-) a a E-4 A to a) �D �4 >4 �4 �4 f 4 w s,4 u a) v a) a) a) a o o u a w 01 a a to 0 (a ►n u >I >I >+ >•4 H o a) 10 0 b (d ra ro rd x >4 r 1~ x x x x x as w (a 41 0 0 o c o 04 o — A h <^ 4-+ U F �+ 3 r+ b o cv aJ (n tT a) Z u) rc7 3 ra (1) ., A a) a) -r-I �4 r to !~ H iz� v b m o .a r a a Ic. rQ 4 a) -r1 (a > a) r 4- 1� ..: (1) O •r1 ] O " H 4J a) u O u (a (a " N (:! O 10 rA a) X, t.) O u z Pi to •ri r-1 O E-4 •V U = ,t: U O 4) r-1 a) a) Ca 4-4 H U rA U a U)A In v F-I ro 0 (1) u f~ O H Z a r~ X ra a) (1) (d b (n Irl Q a) v) 4-1 t -,-I i.) •�c .C� A .Ci :.. ro r-I41a) a) O M 0 W �4 .Q b dl 4J b r4 00 4-) 4--) a) :j r .-A 4 u 10 � EI -1 v u r4 to 0) v o •r+ 4-) u o w x b �4 m -4 w ro 4.4 3 -r1 0 u a 4•) U w �4 44 C: x x o a) v ci r r-4 0 4J •11 L 4 " rd a) a o - r, o 0 0 H 3 -r-+ (ti r a) a) p3 0 r1 ►4 a) o ,� 4J 3 rilr4 0 3 .L+ 1~ ro t I a �4 N �4 N to 2I to a 1 a > ` U 41 a) to 1J r O a) a) it a) a ;?. H a) r40 14 bm to •r1ru3aIn a) ri 3 �I o a r A w �4 a o 0 4J r-1 7.1 ra 0 o H 0 U ui 'C7 44 O M r 4.1 -r-I a) r; a) u - 4 ra a) a) • a) ,a !,I a 4 0 ,C, tT fp 4-4 � to a )J r1 to r1 w r f I w r r to m a) is a) r, u a) aJ A •r-t rb A ra (d 4 a) Q rl r. O to 0 r. r a) -4 •C. 11) ri r-4 a) U 4-J O .>~ -rA -r! 4-J M a) •r♦ o 44 E-1 .0 a r-1 �4 4J4-) v r-I 4 3 �4 r+ u r a 0w 0 a ro 44 � o [ u b r, b o ---4 (a 0 N a) a) tT H o U r to r 41 0 a) a) N4-) In rn u r • u Cl) b1 I.4 >4 H - it r r+ ,-4 rd a) u in In 04•rA 1 (1) rti -1 o a 0 r1 r z r 1 b -1 b !•4 rA a) r� b 0-4 a) , 1 to 0 to a) 0 0 0 a1 X a) a) t7) ::j a) r a) >1 1-4 r }4 a > u rA > u r-f a) > 0 tr r '0 U > o > r-+ a) •r1 ra to o a) o ri m .0 (n [ 00 (n (i) (N r-i o (d a) u a) 1~ a) )4 -A 1r r-1 4-) a) u r-1 to 4J r4 4-) r-I r4 O O r0 0 r1 r1 O m 4-4 L1 M 1. •r-I - a) 3 a) 3 r-1 41 r-A a) W 0 w a) br� 0 4-1 rn Ar� ,-I 4-4 � 4 a) 0 44 a) a 44 15 (1) ro a U a) o r a) (d 1-4 0 a) a) r-1 o Ti �4 4-1 tT 3 to o 14 •r1 o (13 --j b o 1-4 1~ o •ri to 'ill (ll 0 o ,t; si -rI o s:: ra :j -o a) ri (7) 4 ri o a) o G H 44 0 a r o :1 U '> rz X 4-J P O 4-4 a b a U ); �-1 (d U �' A .>~ 0 Ili 0 0 Q In Ir (f) Ill Ur n �4 W as (T O) O) (T til Ol Q) H E-4 I I I 1 I I > rQri to t- r- to (10 C1G (7) ra Q H N N N I I I I 1 I d1 rn N (4 N N N N CD o r, r_D v o 4-4 H (n J ro a Fi ,7 l CX) Ol C:J r 4 4 a 14 • I I U-) Ln W > rn rn rn E� ra I I I OCC O v til A to lW I I I a M C) c o Ln >1 rn r-•1 � �4 rn ro v E4 u r-71 -4 N u 1~ F4 I ro a) a w rn O a41 a. H F F •� F N 3 f ro 1 1✓ O a a O U a W •• U A (1) tJI >i >1 �-I • >r H O ro ro K >- X ro z .x •1-1 O A x w O O til U 44 O E• m O A h a) x a) �r u F a) til a) ro T1 z 141 +4 (1) ul a) 3 Q) v A H H N 'C� (1) K O �4 N >4 rLJ I-a 3 41 >-I O a w C:) ::J a) o a) -CC ••-I r-A 0 3 r-1 3 li Tj Hu 0 0 u3 041 � 7C (aro U) ,OC r1 ro tirotea) U) E-1 •r1 44 (1) ;-) 10 - 3 ro l.) U) ro 0 r1 f0 a) M 0 G a) U U O N a) 1j FI 14 �r rn w H U rt7 F .r� 0 -1 (1) O ro tT N •rA Fa (1) Q) 41a) ­I 34 r-1 004 Aon (3+ a > )•4 ro a) ••-I v O a) 4-) z x O a•r1 • 1~ a) 4-1 a) A 4-1 A U) ra ri 3 U a) 0 H 0 v44 y 0 3 � N a � v a a) 3 ) v) u EA u ,4 r r+ _ _ L3 0 3 E �1 N a a �4rA tn >, r-1 :3 a) ":r (n a) r� O o rtii N z H [ O r4 a (1) �4 a) d' (i ",r-1 S•+ 0 '0 41 a) J) O a 4J a+, rA �111 o r~ --, 3 -Iro vrofn .Am t,1 r7. u ::j •11 In r-1 F a) 3 'r1 �-1 4j u > u O .c' r1 U) O r-1 rb I U 'r, +i a) • 1 a) 0 t71 • Cr lj F r-1 w m u 0 In A . v —1 r-1 r� u) ro ro A a to b In m �4 .14 •r1 b X a 1J a) 0 <~ 0 r-1 pI o a) r+ a) ro ro a qo ro (d > 0 a) N a) co `4 4j 0 .4 N - 4-1 4j •r'1 t71 r-1 ro > v 3 •-1 r-1 -H tT E+ U 4J 10, m u ro c7 N r-1 s 4 a u a) a" 3 u 44 r4 I::: H U a) U a) -A U 0 (D a U) 1~ ro •ri r-1 a) I S O '0 U 1 r, b O r-1 rO 01 G' O a) rd a) rl a) 1:1 r 1 r-4 o a) fn 41 a) A0) a) o .-) A -1 > r� (1) > o (n a) a) 4-) > 41 > 4-) > •1 ri a) O A a) u •r1 S I. (1) 0 r. r4 1~ a) U) 0 ro (1) 4-1 ru 0 r-1 U -4 (1) 1-1 ro r1 4-) ro O O r-A (L) U! 1.1 r-1 U a) J) m uJ S! >4 a) ",Q U ro 0 a) 4--1 4-4 a) 4-1 JJ a) C; 'd 44 a) U) ro '0 44 •ri M a) 44 {-'-, " a ro o rA o :� �4 '0a) -A ortj �4 Q) 0r14Ja 0r� 0 • 4 b 0In0 00Wr, 0 0 0 0 0 w oar-4 a) 00r1ri cz In ,[ M U) 3 rd o: (n ;D a a U (n u O w - r 0 In In In in In P4 pa rn rn rn rn rn a) E+ H I I I I I > oiC tn ao ao 00 (p ao fd Q H N N N N N a) a I I I d1 fLl N N N N N O O O O O IH F' .;:v f, W a Er z N �} n (D H N N IN CJ N a a CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE inspection Line (Reec--O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection:_ Z, Footing Susp. Ceiling Sprink. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Foundation Plhg Underslab ech._Rough-i_n; Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. Plhg. Top Out Ei.,c. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plug. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing -Pluinb. Alarm Water Lino Insulation -Mech. Underflr. Insul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect. Date Requested: ,_ Time: AM PM Address:—�C- �� %ezec 7 Builder:_ Permit q: THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: 0_1 ot J All l' Inspector: 4 Date APPROVED _DISAPPROVED //'APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE ,Call For Reinsp. CITY OF TIGARD MECHANICAL. COMMUNITY DLVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PERM1 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Orpon 97223.6199 (603)630-4171 PE RM I f #. . . . . . . : MF L;94 -0.E`j 4 DATE ISSUED: 03/29/95 PARCEL: 1 f3135BA-02800 SITE ADDRESS. . . : 10380 SW CW:CADE BLVD SUED M S I LIN. . . . : Z ON I NG s 1-4, BLOCK. . . . . . . . . . . LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . GLASS OF WOLF'.. . :ADD FLOOR FURN. . . . : EVP1 LOOLERS: I YPL OF USS. . . . .L:UM UNIT HEATERS. . : VENT FANS. . . UC(--UPf1NCY GRP. . :iia VENTS W,"-) APP':-s VLNT SYSTEMS: S URI E S. . . . . . . . :2 BOILERS/LOMr,RESSORS HOODS. . . . . . . : 0..-3 HI✓. . . . : DOMLS. INCIN: '�-15 HP. . . , s2 COMML. INCIN: MAX INPUTc Diu ' � -30 HP. . . . : REPAIR UNITS:. FIRL DAMPERS". . c 30-•50 HP. . . . s WOODSTCIVLS. . s GAS PRESSURE. . . :M 150+ HID- - :: CLO DRYERS. . : NO. UF LIN I 1 5---_ -----_ AIR riANDL I NG UNITS OTHER UNIT'S. 1- .URN ( 1.00K BTUs (= 10000 cfm: GAS e-UHN )= 100K BTU: > 10000 cfm : Remar^Ps : Beaverton Honda-- construct ra twc-story addition to the existing b,.O leis �Jwner: _________...__..______._____________.__.--_--___ ._..______...__-•- FEES LANPHFRE f NTERPRISEC;r INC. type a;,ou7t by date recpt 12505 SW VROADWAY PRMT f 4C- 00 JDA 01:/08/95 - PLCK $ 1 i., 51Di JDA 02/08/99 BF-AVE:NT-Uhl OR 97005 5PC1 f 2. 30 JDA 0-7 ,,,0 "M5 I-Itiane #: 646-5,1577 H. V. A.. C. INC,. 815 BE SHE RMAN PORTLAND OR 97214 Phone #: 239-48i:2 $ 59. 80 TOTAL. Rey #. . : 50897 --- -- - RE-'.UU.I RED I N6PLCT I('.)N5 -- --•-- This permit is iss6ed subject t: the regulations contained in the UaS Line Insp Tigard Municipal Cods, State o Ore. Specialty Codes and all other Mercrhanic,.�l Insp applicable laws. All work w;it be done in accordance with ►duct l nspect i an approved plans. This permit w:li expir, if work is not started D i na! Inspect i on within 198 days of issuance, or if work is suspended for more than 198 days. N�ermitta Si nature : ISSUe1J Lay : Call far inspect i r.n - 639--4175 City of Tigard MECHANICAL PERM(lT Planck/Rec. #[-3J '13125'sw Han CIA. APPLICATION Permit # Metz,I�LoAl Tigard, OR 97223 ' (503) 639-4171 ssrtaDescription T"3A MechmioW Code CITY PRICE AMT Job Address /U 5 :) s� • 1) Perrnii Foe -0- -0- 1r,.ou _mW2) Supplemental Penrnit 3.00 1 i 1) ind.ducts a vents v 6,00 �-- umace "STU + Owner 2) incl.dins a vents 7,60 umanoe 3) Ind. vont 6,00 4) or floor mounted heeler �— 6.00 Occupant Wnt not irid.to _ b) appliance pormk 3.00 ---s --- _r o g, g. — _� - —— 6) cooling,ebsarptim unit ( vis l 6.00 /a.C9 Dow or L/L C iyYC_ 7) to 3 HP absorp r�%BTU 6.00 HWr or comp. t purnn,air co Contractor 2 f ��� `L'f/5 ��, `�//C;£�.1,�q/1/ 6) 3.15 NP abaorp unit w 500K BTU 2 11.00 2,�,,�o — --Bb er orT—orwnp, a�ie"tpump,ar ca . y 77-, 9 15-30 HP ab step unix.5 1 mit BTL! 15,00 r G'ui' or Comp, ►ea pump,Ar co — S 10) 30.50 HP absorp ta,k 1-1.75 mi BTU 22.60 r ye"Fi—a c)-nawieagpe a Rve r9Fd this appimation, ieoB Ter cr oomp`,,IZ5%pump,ar oo . information given Is correct,that I am the owner or authorized sgent 11) >50 HP absorp ur*1.75 mil BTU 31.50 of the owner,that plan submitwd are In compAanm with StW Air hEWTUn7i E-- laws,that I am registered with dw ConsUmdon ContrecWs retard, 12) 10,000 CFM 4.50 ) that'he number givens correct. (If exempt from State registration, --­Air handing u I--- - f please give reason bMm,) 13) 10,000 CTM 4 7.60 I Non portable 14) evaporate Coder 4.60 -- - en are conm9r-,W-- —_� 15) to t+single duel 300 Z� enaon sy: em no _ T 1 y` i 16) Included in appliance permh — 4.50 17) mechanical exhaust 4.60 l�srnlre vv r-T nee ON" airs!' ra repo a r►3uslrial" to be don4 residential fl non reeidentlnl 18) type indnerabr 30.00 buts ntg 7m4-7--or 1.e., s w—aFR— building ix prop" "_Zlm3/& :rte�/{jl�_ 19) healer,soler,ckAhas dryers,ev-. 4.50 Pr4iossrl use of 20) Gas piping one a lour outl^ts building or property S/J,=`"6 . - _-- 2.00 — - I Type of hael-of Q nature)gas� LPG eMohlo Q 21) Mone than d per out4st --• Minimum Fee$25.00 SUBTOTAL � �, p[1 PERMITS BECOME VOID IF WOFIK OR CONSTRUCTION -�-s- AUTHORIZED 18 NOT COMMENCED VATHIN 160 DAYS,OR 3%SURCHARGE .?�, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK 19 SUSPENDED OR — -- — ABAND014ED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME PLAN REVIEW 25%OF SUBTOTAL s i7 AFTER WORK IS COCAMENCED. _ TOTAL y �y+C Specht Cundh ms — _ y ____..._ _ .� -- Dale Issued z�—"� ..Y by w�ao�wrt - .Mrw.w. THE FOLLOWING DOCI-TMENTS ARE OF POOR ORIGINAI, QUALITY r ��'�T'tia�T•:- _ aS 9•°.v:'9i1��'i'.:=�.r t.t��l �(i�,T._. • I� ;a�. t � .L� Il i� � . 1�[� /• •'•iIIiG.�(i...mow•�Y=.. j.. _ 1l ,�((('''���.''':+ill (��::, �:'c:, :� ♦I� � •.' ! $� ��. �I' ■ '-.c--a.'Ain.drtl..ttd.°...'r.°S�� .:iv s�'J:�i � A( �1L .� � �R!—., . � .:. ' n. ■■■■ mrom '�tt`` TZ Ems ■■■ xlawINSRW ■ 71'l 1, .+ :,' : `�� MORRISON BUILDING CORP TEI_ :c'03--653-0198 Oct 24 '94 13 :08 No .006 P .02 ;� a;.• -r..x;•r <:.. ,. �;5 ", �\ � �•,' IL . • Cis ` t r•'. t.'t 1�'r rG",, '4". �� �s L,�t,.'R W =1��`.s\�i �•`�! �r .f'w d;•,t yk•T, •'•'+ _ f ���� �s�f"'E-7�- \ 912K aL 1, -4f* tklt t •�y"� ,s`•�F `l '� 'Ka�d X41. ` ..,� .� .__ j •..#�.�,: .. •r� F '.�.� '�J�Gei y�r,� I jfl j �r?•x.ifiy�" r�_P..�+� Q"F �� r •� ti .4 {^ �I -4:J^II ti+� yqt� •t!f. - W � !V�kiltGs'!I� y�i 1� HL:W nL 2V)7k a tsar._ 5 s i'J t• � of.'., �+ '�V� ��XL3 Y. '��• •��. � ; :��, s'►�����is. . t tife is ♦s.::. r S � - .rd. �.n1,L.f gra,. `• ural 16 - 'a'�"_' 4S:'�t ..�5 ::,'t�lf "e�rt, l �.� r�,,..ti,1�v`41�v� � •s�Y c'i�"st�.,,,+r.c;. • �� f MORRISON BUILDING CORP TGL :503-653-0198 OCL 24 '94 13 :09 No .006 P .03 L .TT Y O••F .�.!•• 'S. •rf'1.. Irv. .p ' •,'.��;';•'�1 r•1•• '�!' }:.r h .A•�„t. �k1`S"l ZV�► .EIL"LZ 1 i 7t!b J •. - l,lR,. i l gin' -��r�. •�; L:�•� � ,,Ih• }} L ' .:• .I'L �X r'LC�w4,t4�1.rlS•rt�s JL 'my, S%,*1;-Pv x n::. U 20 ty2� :�: roy ruts -s� �. •i„.,fir j.�' WxA4. vI j tT, GAJ ` !'It. 114' x i'•,J. •r'�k;�f•,"�' ;,��:�'- �=€o(W ESP. wA�_t�?'.4.,�� ���•r,. iii •r.t.�."1!?. : ,�J. rA :,�s 7r��k�;�•�,�',�"'g�, , ,. -�'__---�klo Vf`-HZ w( 3!!-1��atiJ AZ22 SMi_�Ctlbift��r «r., t�p.� � �` �—`'~^ —•— dK Gr is `t,4 �}.�� 1 '_1�1 4�:f'+f�V 11'•. LSI+`.,. � �f 2n_ or ./ MORRISON BUILDING CORP TEL :503-653-0198 Oct 24 '94 13 : 10 No .006 P ,04 rr�jl �' x71'•"l!.i•` :e.`•I�yYl�c'.. .�� u �l'I- I:KGb.S ��Stt•+ptitstJ i!#• ,�.i; fti �,:.;, / � �rFthR'tt��y �It. Zfl�,<tr,..S pull..�.J V`,,,",• �f•���fry. ;ti,;,;F.;:,,, �h a,'•} � �13t` 11.i,.r4�cl< �,•�L�t�— ��ixjl 7: wok 1 y.t•F. ,. f �'. 1 J i 44ww1l1��1�•Y(y, ;�7i 4'�'Iy �•Y'l :.jam:`;:'`[� r'^.��/,•°='�'-. •1�:1Gi�c;�.- K�r•lw{�.J•' �.�' L 7{ `3�"e Y _�"� �fCS1 �-s�41'�jx S1/4" ' ..: -7. l t �tn•��+fl RS t�J 'C Eri'r 6P_ at . : • r' '�?�*�. a !! J:GAtddST Dr�- Z X►�;lt0ct To�i�-!t 3q t .i•f�i• 7yl ���.��•7'i'.iwv.�- p_ 1 Y`—Tl ;fit, ,��, , »�'•y (i � .� �' ����' , r9 ., '.' qv 1V TUR10 .max"• �'' ��'., � / 4 CITY OF TIGARO BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection:___ Footing Susp. Ceiling Sprink. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Foundation Plbg. Underslah Mach. Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mach. San. Sewer �~ -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing -Plumb. Alarm Water Line , -Mach. Underflr. Insul. Shear Wall Gy� -Elect. Date Requested: ����.�&y — Time: AM _rPM Address: Z Builder:^ Permit THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: / Insp or:� Date: S'- L-3" �•_'� APPROVED DISAPPROVED _APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE _Call Fat Reinsp. r C I Y Y OF T I GARD — RECEIPT OF PAYMENT RECEIPT NO. 05--263508 CHE=CK AMOUNT t 15q. 80 NAME a HVAC INCORPORATED CASH AMOUNT t 0. 00 AT)DpF5r3 8151 B £tiHE"RMAN PAYMENT DATE" t 03/P9/9', PORTLAND, OR SUBDIVISION a 97PI4—• PURPOSF OF PAYMENT AMOUNT PAID PURPOSE=. OF PAYMENT AMOUNT PAID ME.C;HANICAL PE MEC94-059- 4A. 00 ST. BUILD PER �P. 30 PLAN CHECK FE 11. 50 1.171389) 6A CASCADE TOTAL AMOUNT PAID — —> 59. 60 .yam...,-.�.r.�.��...y,� ►'.1�.h�1t�.^+r.�T��Vr. � �._.-.._ _�)...�_ .•r r- ...r Y..� CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING !NSPCCTION NOTICE Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection: Footing Susp. Ceiling Sprink. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Foundation Plbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Roupti-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain ming' -Plumb. Alarm Water Line Insulation -Meth. Underflr. Insul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect. Date Requested: 3 `' e9 Time: AM PM Address:_ �� 3/T J-Cet_,,1c Builder: Permit ar: THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspector: 'l-Vc� Date:_ ,.-S'- [ Y` / APPROVED —DISAPPROVED _APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE -_Call For Reinsp I9G '. 7-5�7Z_ cL CITY ^r TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOME Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection: Footing gusp. Ceiling Sprink. Rough-in Appr/Sdvilk Foundation Plbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing -Plumb. Alarm Water Line Insulation -Mech. Underflr. Insui. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect. Date Requested: _2� �`15 Time: AM PM z c. Builder. —Permit 0: e),&_ ( THE FCLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: a - Inspect r:- � — _ Date: APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE ____Call For Reinsp. I sts Carlson Testing, Inc• Construction Inspection&Related re Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX(503)684-0954 March 21 , 1995 94-1177 P .O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTIJN REPORT DATFS COVERED: March 2^ , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: M. McHargue 4614 03-20-94: CTI representative is responding to the letter received on this date from TM "ippey' s , Ralph Turnbaugh. Per his review of our non-compliance list it appears several repairs are still required. Please contact our office when work is to be ccmpleted so special inspections can be scheduled as soon as possible. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except ir. fu11, without prior aut.her. ization from this office . If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . Respectfu7_ty s bmitted, C IS ESTI' , INC . 1 J o Blas Leach P sident MM: ak cc : Morrison Bui;ding Co. City of Tigard SERA Architects TM Rippey Consulting Engineer 1 d CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NCItfdE Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4*0**"� Inspection: Footing Susp. CON49 Sprink. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Foundation Plbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. Plhg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing •Plu.110. Alarm Water Line Insulation -Mech. Underflr. Insul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect. Date Requested: ��-�/ Time: AM PM Address: Builder: j Permit THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REOUIRED: _ I Inspector: Date: /APPROVED __DISAPPROVED _APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE _Call For Reinsp. TV CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION 4&ICE� Inspection Line (Rec-O-Pho.,e): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Insoection:� /1- r ►-�.>_ .r-„L _ G_, y \ - Footing '8usp. Calling Sprink. Rough-in Appr/Sdwik Foundation Plbg. Underslab Mach. Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Strutt. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rougn•in FINAL: Post/Beam Mach. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain ��famincd Plumb. Alarm Water Line Insulation Y,•/,/-Mach. Underflr. Insul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect. Date Requested: _ �Tim�e: AM PM Address: Builder. Permitlf:���.n� THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REOUIRED• �� .� ( iry7if�IL�-y..✓L. C2 Inspector: ,4V Gate: S 17-2 APPROVED DISAPPROVES APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE Call For Qainsp. . CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING PERMIC 13125 8W Hall Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 67223.5100 (503)630-4171 PERMIT #. . . . . . . BrJF'9�- k'�0c DATE ISSUE=D: PARCEL: 1S135BA-02800 i t_ ADDRE;:i*�. . . : ,u1N1)I VISION. . . . : ZONING: I--F' BLOCK. . . . . . . . . . . L01.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . REISSUE: FLOOR ARF_AS-- - ---- --- EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION-- CLASS OF WORK. :ADD F I RS)T. . . . :5774 sf N: b:4HR E: W:4HR TYPE OF USE. . . :LOM SECOND. . . :5774 s f PROTECT OPENINGS?-- ------------ TYPE PE NINGS?--_ -•---------- TYPE: OF CONST. s3N THIRD. . . . : st N: S:Y Es best OC:CUPANL Y URP. :B.2 T O FAL------: 11546 s f ROOF- CONST :B FIRE RET'':'Y ULLUPANCY LOAD:231 BASE=MENT. : sf AREA SEAL. RATED: STOR. :? HT. 130 ft GARAGE. . . : s f OCCU SEP. RPTED: BSMT?MN MEZZ?:N REVD SETBACKS---._.____ REQUIRED-----___----___—_--.__ FLOOR LOAD. . . . :75 psf LIEF'T : ft RUH7 : ft FIR SPKL:Y SMOK DET. . :N OWELLIN6 UN? FS: FENT: ft REAR:O ft FIR ALRM:N HNDICP ACCsY BEDRMS: BATHS: IMP SURF'ALL:00 PIRO CORP:N K'11RRtNG: VALUfE. b : 16294 Remarks : Sprinkler permit Beaverton Honda addition. FELS PATRIOT FIRE PROTE=CTION type amount by date rec.pt 3012 NV M I NNLHHI-+A #A t='RM1 $ 122. 55 B 03/16/9'3 FIRE. f 49. 015 B 03/16/9"1 - VI4NCOU9ER WA 98663 SPL T t 6. 13 B 03/ 16/9', Phone #s 206-699-4403 Gantroc,tore _•__.-__.______.____..___ _..___.______ 1441 RIOT FIRE PROTECTION INC 2004 A 413TH AVE: C T EAST TACOMA WR 98424 ___._________._.____._________—_..__—__—.. Whore #: 3r-!Z--699 +41h f 17'7. 68 TOTAL Reg #. . : 70822 ----_-- RLUU I RED INSPECTIONS This pereit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Sprinkler Rough— Tigard Muricipal Lode, State of Ore. Specialty Codes aird ?ii other Sprinkler Final app'icable laws. All Mork will be done in accordance with approve! plans. This pereit will expire if work is not startedM— within .R days of issuance, or if work is suspended for core than 1E18 days. m i t t e e s i g n a t i_k r,e :op v _l•__!�G __..__ _� __. �_i11 for inspecticn -- 6.39-4175 2066994403 PATaIOT FIRE PROTECT 382 P01 JAN 11 195 13:04 01./11/06 il:411 'QJ0J 13 15 4 1A11 %.•ILL 6J aa•uu.v APPLICATION FOR PERMI T INSTALL FIRE SPRINKI. k SYSTEM BUILDINC DIVISION, CITY OF TlCokRO 631-4171 �l 1 GATE PERMIT 0 _ .. -- Valuatlon. Permit Fee: _ _. F L,,5-40% Plan Check Fee: _'5_1712 - -7-�� 5% State Tax: # _ _ _r-• Plans roust be submittoBuilding tDn of the naaregt hydrant ie rtqui�ed ivision before instaktion. Three � of the Plot plan, showing the layout bpd the local Now Installation:_ _ _ Addition: /I Repalr; Aite►atiori; Cvmplrare: ,_„�_ Partial:.Exitway; _,easement_ _— Hood & Vent:.— Spray Booth:—_ IN EXISTING BUILDING: - IN NEW BUILDINC: -.--. NUMBER & STREET: NAME OF BUILDINC or BUSINESS- Dtzr'`y "T�r� ' 1 • NO. OF STORIES; 2 ,SIZE OF BUILDING; OCCUPIED A5: MQ -L4 — "E OF SYSTEMS; Wet.. — Dry; Gombinatlon:_,�.�. STANDPIPES.-_OCC.HAZARD; Llght_,_„ ORD.GRP.HAZARD 11 7_ 3_._4_Extra_____.__ DINSITy_� .I'? GpWFtl DESIGN AREA 1 29_ft2 SPRINKLER AREA;_VW'••� ft1 SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE:! irk" "K" FACTOR�'�'� TEMP, RATING '�'t 2 •- ADDRESS: IO`3b0 - 'E OWNER:_. �Pb3CA Jot_ PLANS DRAWN 8Y; Pvrra-. LS1 _ ADDRESS: 30 !'�l►l_ 'blwr __A.�•1Ar 9�{0�� REMARKS. (-n '� ti�- Z'.'`_ ►`� . ---- APPROVED permits Includes only work de;crlbsd above and/or on plans and specification bearing the same permit number and will comply with all applicable codes and ordlnences of the City of Tigard. SPRINKLER COMPANY: �� iL:tn, I�E�' PHONE: � ��g--�- SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: BUILDING PERMIT VALID FOR 180 DAYS wormcemA�vnrr� I i (4A ------------------------------- 11C� . � DESIGN INFORMATION SHEET DATE ATE LOCATION BUILDING t4� SYSTEM NO. CONTRACTORCONTRACT 1140. CALCULATED BY DRAWING NO. fp CONSTRUCTION HEIGHT FT, 0 COMBUSTIB- NON-COMBUSTIBLE CEILING OCCUPANCY *,NFPA 13. Cl LT HAZ. ORD, HAZ. GP. 41 0 2 0 3 ❑ EX. HAZ. 0 NFPA 231 0 NFPA 2,-IC: FIGURE CURVE (j OTHER (Specify) C, ❑ SPECIFIC, RULING .--- MADE BY DATE UJ AREA OF SPRINKLER OPERATION SYSTEM TYPE DENSITY JWET 0 DRY ❑ DELUGE Cl PRE-ACTION >. AREA PER SPRINKLER AIJQLw_ SLPRINKLJER�NqZZLE HOSE ALLOWANCE GPM: INSIDE MAKEt-11-1laL- MODEL � @ HOSE ALLOWANCE GPM' OUTSIDE 0 SIZE K-FACTORTEMPERATURE RATING RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE CALCULATION GPM REQUIRED10CD PSI REQUIRED AT BASE OF RISER SUMMARY "C" FACTOR USED: OVERHEAD UNDERGROUND WATER FLOW TEST PUMP DATA TANK OR RESERVOIR >- DATE & TIME RATED CAPACITY CAPACITY aSTATIC PSI AT PSI ELEV, TION RESIDUAL PSI ELEVATION GPM FLOWING WELL ELEVATION [PROOF FLOW GPM 't LOCATION -- SOURCE OF INFORMATION COMMODITY _____-.,----- CLASS STORAGE HEIGHT AREA AISLE WIDTH 0 1RACK STORAGE METHOD: SOLID PILED PALLETIZED 0 0 SINGLE ROW 0 CONVENTIONAL PALLET Cl AUTOMATIC STORAGE 0 ENCAPSULATED 0 DOUBLE ROW Cl SLAVE PALLET 0 SOLID SHELVING ❑ NON- CI MULTIPLE ROW Cl OPEN ENCAPSULATED FLUE SPACWG IN INCHES CLEARANrc FROM TOP OF STORAGE TO CEILING_ I LONGITUDINAL --- TRANSVERSE t-T_ IN. 0 1 u i HORIZONTAL BARR;ERS PROVIDED CI7*v' OF TIGARD - RECEIPT OF PAYMENT ReCC.I PT 140. #95-263023 M4ECK AMOUNT a 61A. 90) NAME a PATRIOT FIRF. PROTECTION CASIA AMOUNT a lb. 00 ADDRESS a 3012 NE MINNEHAHA ST. UNIT A PAYMFNT DATF s 0'; 16 L)9 VANCOUVER, WA SUAD I V 19 1 ON 98663 --1409 PURPOSE OF PAYMEN I' AMOUNT PAID PURPOSE OF PAYMUNT AMOUNT PAID 0021 42. 05 FIRE LTFE ,AF EY PLAN (-,K 16. so ST. SWiLD PER 2. 10 BEAVERTON HONDA TOTAL. AMOUNT PAID !3 CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 11 Inspection: ' o t.�, Footing Susp. Ceiling- Sprink. Rough-in Appr/§dwlk Foundation, Plbg. Underslab Mech, Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. ^!hg. Top Out Elec. Rol.gh-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing -Plumb. Alarm Water Line Insulation -Mech. Underflr. Insul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. •Elect. Date Requested: AS q/_'5 Time: AM PM Address: t/G' 3 Builder: L_� �/�f_ —Permit 0� —e,O 960 THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspector: �� Date: rC ',,LAPPROVED —DISAPPROVED `APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE all For P9insp. Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting 6X12 CONCRETE REPORT OF_+ _ TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C 172/C 1231./C:31/C39/C1064/C 14:i Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: _-_ _ __ _ _— —___ Phone(503)684-3460 03/09 95 194-1177 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: -_ _._---__ , 19--__ _ Job No. -- __.. Permit No: — MORRISON BUILDING CC Client: --- ------------------ BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Project: -- - -- "— ---.- --------- ------- 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE TTGARD OR Address: �_ — — --- ------ -- — -- --- ---- MORRISON BUILDING CO Contractor: _. —____ _—_—_____ Sub Contractor: LONE_ STAR NORTHWEST 120 208710 Concrete Supplier: _.______._—__._.._—_ Truck No. ___ ___Ticket No. K . THRALL 10 1 Cast By: __---- - --_----__.----__-- - -Cu.Yds. ----Load No. - — RAINY 56 34 Weather: Temp.High: —_ _______._1"emp.Low: -- __ 2ND LEVEL FLOOR 0 G & 2 Location of Placement: _ �_ — ------.--____-. �__.__-- ------- --------------------.-.----. 7:45 45 _-_ --_Test Time: ---------Concrete Temp: _ _- 3500 28 4-1 I Strength Requirement: -- ------- - -- - --- PSI a -__ -___.__ _days Slump ______Cement Type ---._.--_- 234 W/AEA 3/4 " Mix No./No.Sacks ___---Air Content -- - Max.Aggregate --- Admix.Amount — —.Brand: .—Admix.Amount: -.-Brand: — -- Set I Test® Register Date Date Total s Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Rec'd Test Load PSI No. By 7 0611 03/10 03/1( 93,339 28.11 3320 18 KB 28 0611. 03/10 04/OE 129,030 28.34 4550 21 JB 28 0611 03/10 04/OE 126,850 28.34 4480 21 JB Remarks: cc-:CITY OF TIGARD ---- --- - --- --_-- SERA- ARCH ITEUS, T M RIPPEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS '^tnrmation contained herein is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. Carisan T'es ting, Inc. Constuction Inspection & Related Tests Geotechnical Consulting 6X12 CONCRETE REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS - - P.O. Box 23814 ASTM 0172/C 1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 Tigard,Oregon 97281 i est Methods: _ Phone(503)684-3460 03/09 95 94-1177 FAY#684-0954 Date Molded: _ , 19—___ Job No. - Permit No: MORRISON BUILDING CO Client: BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Project: 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE TIGARD OR MORRISON BUILDING CO Contractor: _—_ — _ —SibContractor: LONE STAR NORTHWEST 120 208710 Concrete Supplier: _____ — _________ _Truck No. _ --Ticket No. K . THRALL 10 1 Cast By: _ _—e�_— —__._ _-..-_Cu.Yds. _ ___ _ Load No. RAINY 56 34 Weather: Temp.High: Temp.L,ow: _____ 2ND LEVEL FLOOR @ 6 & 2 Location of Placement: —_- 7:45 45 ---___-- - -- ---_---- -�----Test Time: —_ --Concrete Temp: 3500 28 '4" I Strength Requirement: PSI @ -- days CIu,nij _____--_____Cement Type _ — 234 W/AEA 3/4 " Mix NoJNo.Sacks —___—__ ---- Air Content Aggregate --- Admix Amount: --_.__,—Brand: —_—. ..Admix.Amount: Brand: Set Test@ Register Date Date Total Area I Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd fest Load PSI No. By 7 0611 03/10 03/1(- 93,339 28.11 3320 18 KB 28 0611 03/10 04/0 28 0611 03/10 04/0 1 Remarks: cc-C T T Y OF TIGARD I M RIPPEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS '-formation contained herein is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this(,Tice. Cstructinlrspection&Related TeCarlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX(503)684-0954 March 7 , 1995 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPJRT DATES COVERED: March 3 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRt -)S: 10380 SW Cascade Avenue -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: M. McHargue #614 03-03-94 : CTI representative was present on site for ultrasonic inspection of full penetration shop weld repair at cantilevered beam. The shop welds were previously found to be partial penetration welds. Per the engineer' s fix, the top flange and 6" of the web were to be fixed and made into full penetration welds. The final location to be corrected at the roof level was done and found to be UT okay. This completed item 26 of the non-compliance report. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full , without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further_ questions regarding this matter, pl-ease do not hesitate to contact this office . Respectfully su itted, CA LS T. STI_N, NC . Do" las Leach 1'r sident MM: ak cc : Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard SERA Architects TM Rippey Consulting Engineer Constnxtion Inspection&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX(503)684-0954 March 3 , 1995 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COv'FRED: Februar�_� 25 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: B. Suminski #399 02-25-94 : CTI representative checked mesh at the second level. The mesh was placed according to plans provided. A 3500 psi concrete from Lonestar was placed. Concrete tests were performed and one set of three cylinders was cast . Our reports pertain to the material. tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further quF-stions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . Respectfully su m tted, C T7�N �C C. ,po las VilLeach �Pr sident l�lS :ak cc: Morriscn Building Co. City of Tigard CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639 Inspection:` Footing Susp. Ceiling Sprink. Rough-in Appr S Ilk Foundation Plbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Fireplace Post/Boam Struct. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer (—Mas -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing -Plumb. Alarm Water LineInsulation -Mech. Underflr. Insul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect. Date Requested: ?' Time: AM _�PM Address: Bu;'ier: C'? Permit #: 9Z/__ 6-:9 THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: cr�G c` *-���� Inspect / Dato:�rv_zs PROV DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE `Call For Reinsp. CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Insp9ction: Footing Susp. Ceiling Sprink. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Foundation Plbg. Undjrslab Mach. Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mach. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor <�Igin Uro Framing -Plumb. Alarm Water Line Insulation -Mach. Underflr. Insul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect. Date Requested: /� l�J Time: AM PM Addiess: l ' 3 R& Builder: j 1� / _Permit THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: T Inspector. Date: -��- -APPROVED _DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE _-all For Reinsp. Construrtion Inspection&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(S03)664-3460 FAX(503)684-0954 March 1. , 1995 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: February 27 and 28 , 1995 PROJECT: Beavertin Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue — Tigard, OR L,.''' INSPECTOR: M. McHargue 4614 02-27 & 28-94 : CTI representative was present on site to generate a complete non-compliance list for the projec--. All connections were inspected, including the shop fabricated items. See attached list. CTI representative A. Ewing contacted thr. engineer to clarify welding symbols. The engineer stated that he only required welding on one side of stiffener plates when the 0 symbol was shown. All shop welds except those noted were found to be welded with acceptable sizes . All items require review by the structural engineer . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, Except is full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . bectfully s tted, SS INC. las / Leach identchment ML: ak cc : Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard • A 1 W H a RCO W a Ln a) a) :), � � b .� r E-4 r � u En r ri rnEn Q w H Q to a O - um a) a o to •• U a) Q to 14 •ri H U �4 bl m ru a1 E+ GO A1 0 r i rn m N to A H En H 0 ro ro b N W ro = t1 Q ri 3 'd O Q) Q d� 44 b O A -4 -ri +) b Q) A (9 O � a) >� A ro \ r-1 O Q) u O a) to --I O rix m A,44 •. 1 3 [ b Q) to U O N O 1•r N 3 N t� �: b 3 b H U a a) cu ++ � O A '+ O r 1 En ,-+ - 1� C r-1 v) E. Z m 3 N u 0 .1 b - a v a) 'o .t7 rd o �+ a) rd t!1 Q 't7 b, •ri --1 (U ,—I •ri r', En U •-� r b1 f. Cl' 0 a) A N a) \ rl .X rd W H r-1 ri to v1 ,4 V t!4 3 O ri (%] @ O ri rd rt7 rd r1 4 N 44 � H a a) •rl b b N b1 t� ; K b ri r-i c: u V in N 7 a x 3 a) r-1 a) E: N 'O ro b 1~ a) a) o b Q a) •ri o z £ n Q a) si rn r~ a) r i •ri a) b 44 b Ln .-q to �: a) to .r N OO 3 u O N4-) a) 3 > G ri UO En AbQ) rO E-4 (a au H mb b o ot1 bi0, En C o � t1 rlo r a r-i tJ a 4.1 41 to u s-1 �i a) o 41 t l r-1 o a) Q rb � r-i M z H ri o e to H w b o -rO t-) a) rl 4.jLn tJ ;� r-4 �• O a -11 a) L' 'U b r4 O to •ri C".. Ln •r•i 1-J U r-1 • H O r"1 ro N (a U 44 :J (A ZZ a) r1 4) r0 tow too O • 41 'j a) •r•1 dq Q \ b H Z ti V.) riN Ards —1 -0 0tj lc:VUUNw \ aoC: Uto 3 44 M (1) a) (1) N (D N \ a) a - 4,J 41 A t� 10 m ri rb b •r1 ri r-i 'T r b br R1 C: a) + 41 ni y to rd a) ra (1) t• t� a) a) 4-4 r- r-1 O a) �' G.' A Q) r ri A, r•-1 r-1 tJ b (1) a) 3 J "a •ri •ri rt7 (0 rO O 4 d b 4-1 to rt7 •ri r-i a U TJ r-1 (L) .1 to a) 4-4 w X [.' r-♦ r-♦ •rl t1 O H \ rl Q) -,A ri H br H a) Q r-i > 3 u A . O Q) 44 r 4 41 .-+ P 010 t r U dr 4-4 �.' H Q) p4 r1 to •ri a) a) E, c H %D 3 br yr br tJ •14 CT r-r •r1 In to rr " 0,44 rl r1 rl dr -A •1 dr to ul + b br� O tj M r 1 a) r-1 \ b :Rt CO N O 1J rd rd G K c r 4 •Q •ri U •r1 'tj U '0 1J > -r-irr \ () 41 O X .0 a) -r1 O :3 J O •11 d' -ri 3 a) () • 0 a) 44 to r-1 a) 14 A t1 o 0 30 u a) O v N \ Q) )-a 1.1 m r-1 f•1 J. M .C. a) O r-1 r-r U7 (a r-i N r-1 U r--1 .--I fn A a) •r1 ri U c a) J-r U 0 a) 41 A 44 NU th 4-4 b 1; W (1) 3 A 44 ko 0 b+ •ri A 4-4 3 �p o a r-1 Q a) O r1 ci E-, a N •r-1 v b r-1 r-♦ ,1 b a) b Q 34 IJ b O O > O a) O a) O Q O \ a) a) �r O O 4-1 rl 1.4 rl a) r-1 Q -ri Q I~ O O •rl q U O O 4J P U 7•r U H !-r M U r-1 EH-� 4-4 0 Ul (0 N X }A U N 4-4 O N U 4•4 .t O x u V A Ln Ln in Ln rn Ln rn �4 W W rn rn rn rn rn rn rn Q) H H 1 rt) Ca H N N N N N N N tIl (�l N t J N N N N C7 CD O O G O o E� U h 0 E-4 Z .� N � � rn �P r- 0: a a _ A in W a) Ha 1 l< Q v Q VI N W 1 O I if. rn m rn .a �A rA v [ r+ F bi 1 N b d' Rl L U >4 H A pa OZ � b a v A O U �A •• U v W >4 H Q I 1.1 K z o •.� W U 4 A O • A rn v - to b A. -I U H 'A A +� v 4) U r-4 u) H Ha10 u ) O N b G Q) O n x U v, F•� �1 v 1J n -44 4 L b b U N N [; 1 OU 3 c`1A 1 z., W H ^7 41 M '0 U rl 4) 4) H 1t7 y H U 3 0 U "I r� :j v b 4-1 3 3 Fz] .>~ r. QOa 0a >4 v ro a. En rye U1 O 41 n lj C.' .-i H [+7 H W N - N to 4 H a r i O r-1 F 0 .4 41 O a N a1 v W .-t U •:-1 r-♦ . 4 r-1 w 1J �$ a z £ 44 O U -1 a) r-1 r) O u) O tW 0 (d u4 0 0 O H O �li v U r I X A► r 1 •r1 O 41 >y .0 u] U E4 f4 O b H ., 4.J 41 41 to a 1 f>4 4 vv 0 , 1 NO a Urc$ 4 � Q) O tx z H 4j • 4 q W10 rA > A-j v (t) v v >1 f< n a �4v43 b v 3q q w r, b )4 4) v A U z u n 4 N 'CJ w Q) w r- 1-1 O rC 04 U) r' O 11 O L7 r1 4j U ri O (1) G )4 'U W 1 11 , to (1) m w L) U 3 ro r-1 O 41 A QJ b o a ro o in In v v 0 ro 1:1 101 a) 4-JOi \ In rd r. ro 7 r-1 r1 H 'll J 1a v 71 Irl n ri ri r� W w b+ E 4 -1 4) w ,vq M Q) O ao •�3 CJ 10 q H o< > 117 .>~ U W rO R. t- 0 41 0 _I 4) rl r. -i () O 4) 4) 4) to rC 1' �4 N n rd N -1 1J )-1 (A u) )4 4) 1-I .f: P N Q) S-1 r-1 0 •ri r 1 O -4 J 4) n )-1 O U n k O .0 0 v x > W 41 •r-I O 4j T) O r-A 0 4 O rl U 0 O •11 11 10 M Gi Q) b r1 n (V r-i 4j r-1 �j r1 r-1 r1 O ri 4.4 03 I 1 )4 Oq w (0 0 Q) to w X- Q • w w a W rl w0 W •r1 , JJ n u 11 ra v v >1 3 to l) 1l: a) rU 0 r-1 rC b Q) 4) b '0 r-I '0 J- b b b - r b Oroa) H 044 -r-+ r. r. 0o Gr ub a (Ao (a0a) 0 (V in u) N 4-1 E' to N O N r� t-4 O N .C; N r1 4-1 li o x 0 41 ,� in to In to in 1r1 In in N W W a aN m rn a) rn rn rn Q) P E•+ 1 I I I I I I I > m r b A H N N N tV N N N N v a 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 fV N tN N N N i`7C-) O 'J O O C O 4-I E+ I r� u ftl Qi I i� W a1 O In I F-1 r--1 a. w A W Ln W D o� QU) N W � a N 0 rn L a rn 0) (1) nJ 3 aJ U) r4 A 41 •r1 ::j ro r o 1 UU) b � ' ro w 44 > E rn U }4 r-4 ro u b O H U) JJ a 04 pAq X 4 U f rn •• u 4j ra ~ 7� 14 b ty wrote OD a h ri) w p3 mrd O N v v� Otr 4-jW 3 ro ai ri A a) a) r1 N G to >4 HH rib b a) a) 01 rI br .7 N (L) r~ 41 4 4 a) O •r-I O JJ H iJ 4J a) v C7 u ra (0 4-) 41 [ o ro r-I a) 1) O r. u HU N •rl -4 O H v U = 4 U O -) r a) a) p w H a Uar. XEn roa) � I Ha) rro � brn > U � O � W a) N c -r-A 4.J 4 --1 b ILI 41 a) a) O W H A ro tr 1, ra W :, 0 -4 4 U b 0 H �7 (1) \ u -A U) U a) W J -H 1J f~ O w Z b )-a a) ., a.) b 4-4 3 •r1 0 JJ O l.) U 44 )4 4.4 ro x O a) a) [. c: r I 0 -[ V •r1 44 J-, rd a) a O -•rl 0 0 0 H >4 3 -,A rd r; N a) E- 3 O r-i rA O 0 41 u 3 u± U H a) r 3 1 O 4 4 '7 tT a >4 >4 >4 s4 En b rn 4-) a > 4-1 4-1 a) U) ,J �i o (1) a) ro O a) H a) \ .+ >4 • b a) m -1F: u3a- m -1 3P Q (4 r-1 W 1; a 0 0 4.1 r-I ro ro 0 O r-A O U ;p_ u •r1 w 0 rd �y Ci 41 -H a) •r-! a) U •rA ro a) a) - a) -r.1 W 44 U) 0 ro 04 tT 44 '! V) (L) tJ ! U) -I W C N \ w f:: Pi N (1) a) to () o U a) a) A ra (0 si a) A aaOuly r. aa) rA4ror� U 11 O 4 •ri •ri O ro a) -A O V. 44 H 1-) A b a .-i* !-r 0 JJ a) r•i 0 3 p r-1 u r. a 0 w 0 ri a b 4-4 \ 0 J., u 0 4 O ro a) r(i \ C t~ a) a) CT H OU 0U) r: C7a) a) NN inrnUG - U rn tTN ro •+ • r ro a) u cn rn a�I r� v 10 a o r-I rd p r-I 0) r I rC7 CT-,I • (1) r-1 to 41 U) a) J 0 O (1) X a) a) CT �j (L) r-I a) >, r-I Fr P a > U r--I > U r-I (11 > J-) Ul 0 10 U > o > a) •ri ro tT O (1) O 1-4 0 N N .[ m N v (N r-I O ro a) U a) .[ a G .7 r-i •o A " a) U r- W 1J r-r 4J r1 r4 O O 10 O r-I r-1 O cn 44 P U) 9 -r4 - Q) 3 a) 3 A r--A +-) rA v N O W a) v 0 V 44 a) A f~ r•i 44 ro � a) O 4-4 a) a 44 a) to a a) 0rla) (ap Ora a) a) rI 0b >4V 03 (A 0 �4 -11 o ri b o r-I C: o •rA rn X1 a) o O 4 x7 •r1 o I~ ro �j -r1 (1) r4 o 41-4 o w o a E-+ 44 JI ark :J U > (1� X 4JH4J44 rx row U P 14 (6 C4 4-) u a � o _ x 0 aJ A ui Ln Ln un Ln Ln >4 P4 rn rn rn a, rn ON (1) HH r 1 r r r > w r r- co 0o co w ro A H N N N N N N d W N N N N N N O Q O O O (D O II H u U) OO to c-- a 0) o -+r w a �A7 I Ha A 0 W ' >1U) Q1 rl - r+ p �4 � rov r+ r H 0 H U U u1 u r rn V tn N r 0 Q a u a, { ►p7�7 4-1 Tl H O I{ � O •x W u] U w O A X a) En X07 U H a) �. Q) ro b iJ Z En �r t 4 0) ul v 3 a� a • A 4 a) K O >-1 V] p b N Or. O c::) :J a Oa) C: r-i r-{ O 3 r-i 3 a r{ C') 11 'd z R1 q N 41 N -ri vi iJ O • ro r-I H u O U " JJ iJ k ro 0 ul .1~ H -Hb 'd a) N F+ -A 44 ro - >✓ ro lJ ul ro +l .i 1 (a vl r. a) u u a W H U 'd F-+ X� O •q a) -4 O (d til p -ri H a) a) a) iJ a) A 1-1 J " A O cn P4 z 0 a > ro d •r♦ a) (D a) 7' z z O C; "•ri a) 1.1 a) r-1 A w A (nb M 3 u N a O H O (L) ti-4 a) 0 3 = N ,O C1 V a1 3 a) a) vl a E-4 u ►4 rl Tr.-1 71 s~ : b 03 >+ >4 ,1 a a >ti -H ul >r -i 3 •r1 O O a) 4 04 z H > O r•i a) p a) �r a) p JJ [~' 41 a) 1.) a(1) a -Paw �+ 4 r-, ro a) rom L) a) u z U -11 -r1 (n -i H Q) r{ . ( cJ u > u o O r i N O r-1 R7 1 U r 1-1 r i a) -ri a) O to • v 1-1 H r-1 W vl U a' in iJ 4 • +J r-I ri 0 m ro ro Q a b1 • 'd (r1 a) 14 •ri •ri '0 X O a) •r{ a) (d ro 0, v ro ro > s~ a) ul 0 co •ri v O W - •ri 1.1 - LJ 0 -r1 '- 1-7 0)ri (b > a) ,r '-i r-I •ri b+ E u " a, M u ro 'd N H < �4 a.c.; u a) 7J 3U w E O H a) .- Hu a) u i u O a) r� M r. 5 ri r 1 a) r-1 C. old (J -419 � 'd O r-I 'd O 1 0 O a) b a) a) G r-I 11 O a) u) r, 0) A a) q •r{ a) O iJ A r I > N > 0 w 0 w " > iJ > • :1 v > •1-I r1 a) 0 A 0) u -r.{ 3 4 (1) 0 r, r-1 a a) ul O (0 a) 0 b O 1-4 U ri a) iJ 'd •-1 -W ro O 0 r-i a) ul F4 H U a) 7J Rl 6] c !4 (1) a A u ro 0 a) 0 4a (1) w 7J a) 0 b 4-4 a) N (d b 44 •ri N a) w 0 " a ro O r-i O ::J f`+ b a) r-i O b f4 a) O 11 iJ 1:: O G O •r{ C O (nO 00a) 0X: a) O vOroul 0ar•1a) OOr-Ir-i t; V4 in .0 a in 3 d F-+ �:J R: to :D A, 0 0 in u O x a 0 aJ q (n (n (n ui ui f� W W rn rn Cr) C) rn v HE ul w ao co ao ao ro Q H CV N N N N ai -1' fly N N N N N U O CJ O O 4-a 0 H (�uj� . aQ E+ z N (n Ln �D ro a+ H C17 N N N N a a • Construction Inspection&.Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. GeotechniCal Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684.3460 FAX(503)684.0954 Februery 28, 1995 94-1'77 P. O. 4008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: February 23 and 24 . 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: M. McHargue 4614 02-23-94 : CTI representative was present on site for visual and ultrasound inspection of cantilevered beams . The full penetration spliced shop welds were previously rejected due to being partial penetration welds . All repairs made in the field done per engineers fix. 1 . Roof level, six beams total . The top flange and 6, of web were repaired by scarfing and r.ewelding. All repaired locations at roof level were found acceptable with ultrasound. 2 . 'Decking , puddle welding, and button punching roof level . Several missing welds and button punching rioted. 02.-24-95 : CTI representative was present on site for visual and ultrasound inspection of cantilevered beams . The full penetration spliced shop welds were previously rejected due to being partial penetration welds . All repairs made in the field done per engineers fix. 1 . Roof level decking . The missing puddle welds and button I ,:nchi.ng acceptably completed prior to concrete pour. 2 . 2nd floor level cantilevered beams , six. total . The top flange and 6" of web were repaired as required. All locations reoaired as required. All locations repaired were found UT ok..ay. 3 . The cantilevered beams at 2nd floor grid line C and E were found to have been spliced at the top flange mix section of beam. These were tested and found not be full penetration welds . The contractor notified the structural engineer who recommended that they be scarfed out and repaired. This was done and tested with ultrasound. The two locations were found UT okay. 4 . 2nd floor pu.ddl.e welding and button punching. Grid lines 3-5 and from 1 11ne north acceptably completed. February 28 , 1995 94-1177 Page 2 of 2 CTI representative was present on site for inspection of wire mesh (6" x 6" ) with 6" laps as required. Foand placement at the roof level to be acceptable. Also see attachment from the engineer accel:ting the 3000 psi light weight concrete. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information r:ontai.ned herein is not to be reproduced, e�.cept in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully sub ted, CARLSON T SNC. Prelas Leach ident chment ML: ak cc: Morrison Building Co. _ City of Tigard "n S.W.BA*W mwd.SWW w TM RIPPEY pbok"d. mit 1 . caystrt�rr�c�crcrrr�t Rs Moya hast z"-w" EaxOM)2.4m91 RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATCON PROJECT:__ PROJECT DATE:,r�`alb�q TIME, PERSON: COMPANY: PHONE NO: INCOMING -- OUTGOINO CAV-I-: - th Lk V%A �flP_r;Fes.P Jb0_,.�.: �1 -"�`� C�C.v t_ "1�•��"' T �1���. O.V.d tl,.a 35oo-Ps• --- 4t%oe c roo — CG� iia veo�t 8921 CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Line (Rec-O Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4'� , Inspection: "` �.22G y,i dt Footing Susp. Ceiling - Sprink. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Foundation Plbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. 4NOW, Elec. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor `---Pial ram _ Framing -Plumt, Alarm Water Line Insulation -Mech. Underf!r. Insul Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect. Date Requested: i`, - r Time: AM PM Address: 163 3 FG Builder._-L= --2Z�,/ Permit #: C' THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Zactor: 4-'�!' Dater/ PPROVED DISAPPROVED _APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE —.-Call—.Call For Reinsp. MORRISON BUILDING COPP TEL :503-653-0198 Feb 28 '95 11 09 No .005 P .Q1 Cnc��gt..rr Alp-r,2a xtxfir KIlz' Tf,i*- tT - �^.�._.,___. ....._.._�� .,,Z,• �-�,�,._ n c, lot, �` t�_�7►'?[�«1 "'�. ✓ .\ I % tictao `9 TvrIt X90 F1fRK�E�G� — O4Naak,t z.Q7,5. 14 1 .i l� r RIPP�'Y w"Jlh- �'!7N►l1TI.YG LYCMEI111 92A S.W Nthr,:•B:%-d Pott4nd,L)rgo:i 97214 Phm(!Ti)744 0266 sm w—�._.A�� Inc. onstruction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, nc. Geotechnical Consulting 6X12 CONCRETE REPORT OFTESD SPECIMENS - - P.O Box 23814 ASTM C172/C123i/C31/C39/C1064/C143/C231 Tigard,Oregon 97281 ,Methcds: _ __._ _-_ _- -___-. Phone(503)684-3460 FAX q 684-0954 02/25 95 94-1177 Dale Molded: ---- ------, 19 - Job No. — °ermlt No: ----- --- MORRISON BUILDING CO Client - ---- - --- _ ---- - -- - BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Pmµvct: - -- .. -- - - - - - ------- - 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE TIGARD OR Address: - -------- ------ - -- - - ---- -- MORRISON BUILDING CO Contractor ---___ —__-.--- ------- - -----Sub Contractor: -- - - LONE STAR NORTHWEST 123 260301 Concrete Supplier. ----__-_-- __- -�_..____- Tnick No. Ticket No. -- -------,----_-- B . SUMINSKI 10 1 Cast By: ---- --- - --- —--- ----Cu.Yds. ---- --- - ...Load No. ----- ------ CLEAR 62 48 Weather- --_---- -_..- -_-_-.Temp.High: -------_--____Temp.Low SECOND LEVEL DECK Location of Placement: - --- -- ----- ---- - - - - ----- - -- -- 8 0,15 59 Test Time: __ _ Concrete Temp: 350171 26 Strength Requirement: -- - PSI w days Slurnp -_____- Cement Type 234 4 . 1% 3/4 Mix No./No.Sacks Content _-. - --..__-._-- Max.Aggregate -- - " Admix.Amount. -_ _ Brand: ,-__ .Admix.Amount: __Brand: _ Set Test@ Register I Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tdsted No. Days 'lumber Recd Test Load -_ PSI No. By 7 0a70 02/27 03104 80,584 28.23 2850_ 15 KB 28 0370 02/27 03/2 28 0370 02/27 03/2 Remarks: _CC:CITY OF T I GARD Information contained herein is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorf7a6on from this office. a Inc . onstruction Insrection &Related Tests Carlson T .ies nga cGeotechnical Consulting oX12 CONCRETE REPORT OF __—____ _______..TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231./C31/C39/C1064/C143/L;231 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Mathods: Phone(503)684-3460 02/25 95 94-1177 FAX N 684-0954 Date Molded: -_-- - - - . 19--- — Job No. ------...----.----- Permit No: ----- -----------------___._ MORRISON BUILDING CO Client: — —. - - - — ----.. —� ----- -- -- BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING P'oiect - ---- ----- - - -- ----------- --- ------ ---- —-- 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE TIGARD OR Address: --- —— —- ----- -------- MORRISON BUILDING CO Contractor: ---_ _--_ _ ___— Sub Contractor: _ -- —.----- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 123 260301 Concr4le Supplier: _____Tn rk No. —_--_ Ticket No. _ —__�-- B . SUMINSKI 10 1 Cast By: __-- _-- __-_—--_ -_ --Cu.Yds. ----.. _-- Load No. CLEAR 62 48 Weather: -----_._._.____-_ --------- _ .— --- Temp.High: -__._-------Temp.Low: SECOND LEVEL DECK Loc:ationof Placement: - - - ---- - ---------- -- -- - ---- --.M_. ..._-- ------- — --- - ----- 8:05 59 - _ _ __— -------------- Test Time: --- ----Concrete Temp: --------- Strength Reouirenrent: -- -- ---------_ -_PSI Q —days Slump ------------Cement Type 2:34 4 .1% 3/4" Mix No./No.Sacka Content - ------- Max.Aggregate -------_-_— -- W/AEA Admix.Amount: —____... __Brand: Admix Amount: _ _ --Brand: _— -- ... Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area i Unit RF.-,ort Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load PSI No. _ By 7 0370 02/27 03104 80,584 :9.23 2850 15 KB 28 0370 02/27 03/2E 131,900 28.26 4670 7.0 JB 28 0370 02/27 03/2 132,790 28.26 4700 20 JB Remarks CC:CITY_ OF TIGARD Informa,-i contained herein is not to be reproduce 1,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. �J Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting 6X12 CONCRETE REPORT OFFEST SPECIMENS 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C?1Tigard,Oreeggonn97281 /C39/C1064/C143 P•Oo7281 Test Methods: - ___— ___ _ _ Phone(503)684-3460 02/24 95 94-1177 FAX p 684-0954 Date Molded: - — , 19_----- Job No. ---__._ —r Permit No: —_..�---_--__.-_---- MORRISON BUILDING-. CO Client: ------ --- - ----T--- BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Protect: ,— --_w_--- - ---- ------ -- - ---- --------- ---- -- ------ 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE TIGARD OR Address: - MORRISON BUILDING CO Contractor: _._..___--___ _ _ _^ Sub Contractor: LONE STAR NORTHWEST 42 260233 Concrete Supplier. No. ----Ticket No. -- M. M. MCHARGUE 5/60 �. Cast By: CLEAR 64 48 Weather Temp. Igh: Luw: ROOF LEVEL tccalion of Placement: --- 10:45 66 Test Time: _-_________..__ Concrete Temp: ---------- 3000 28 3 3/4 1 Strength Requirement: PSI0 ---._--_---dayeSlump .__ --. _ Cement Type 204 3/4" Mix NoJNo.Sacks ---- -- -----_ Air Content -- ----_-----_-- Max.Aggregate ---_- -_-- _-- Admix.Amount: -___ - _Brand: _______.___. Admix.Amount: _.— _.____—Brand: �—.— Set TestO Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested i— No. Days Number Recd Test Load PSI No. By 7 0388 ( 02/27 01 '03 109,350 28.32 3060 1.4 , KB 14 0388 02/27 03/1C 121,420 28.17 4310 16 KB 28 0388 02/27 03/24 144,160 2`t.26 53.00 19 JB cc:CITY OF TIGO,RD Remarks: - - —- - - Inlormatlon contained herein is not to be reproduced,oxcept in full,without r rior authorization from this o`fice. Construction Inspection 6 Related Vests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting 6X12 CONCRETE REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 ,Oregon 97281 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: Phone(503)684-3460 02/24 95 - - _— 94-1177--- — - - FAX #684-0954 Date Molded: __.`_ -.___ 19_-- Job No. -.____-._ -_ _ Permit Nr,: -------_------.__-_ -_----_-_...--_-----__--- MORRISON BUILDING CO Client: ----- ----- - -- --- -- - BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Project: ------ --- - --- --- - .__�.�-,_ 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE TIGARD OR Address: --__-_ _ --_ __ -_.- -- -- -------- --- -- MORRISON BUILDING CO Contractor: ______ -_- - -----Sub Contractor: --_- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 42 260233 Concrete Supplier: ___-_----Truck No. -._ Ticket No. M. MCHARGUE 5/60 1 Cast By: _ . -- - _ _-__Cu.Yds. _-—_ CLEAR 64 48 Weather. _.-_-- - --- ----- -- Temp.High: ------Temp.Low: __. .--_--_-- ROOF LEVEL_ Loration of Placement: --..-- ---- __---_-T--. ____ 10:45 66 -----.Test Time ------- Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: ---- ---- - -- -PSl t? -.- -._._drys Slump _ _ Cement Type -_ 204 3/4" Mix Nn Mn.Sacks - Air Content - -- Max.Aggregate - - ---- Admix.Amount: Brand: __ -Admix.Amount: --------Brand: Set TestO Register Date Date Total gfea Unit ReFFort Tested No. Days Nimber Rec'd Test Load PSI WOO 7 0388 02/27 03/03 109,350 28. 32 3860 14 KB 14 — 0388 02/27 03/1 121,420 28.i? 4310 16 KB 28 03AV-11 02/27 03/2 cc=CITY OF TIGARD Information crxrtalned herein Is not to be reproduced,except in hill,without prior authorizatter.from thin office. irction rnspertum &Related Tests Testing Inc Grotechnical Consulting 6X1 CONCRETE HFPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C:1064/C143 P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Test Methods: _ _ _ Phone(503)684-3460 02/24 95 94-1177 FAX N 684-0954 Date Molded: , 19 _ Job No. _ Permit No: -----_---__.. MORRISON BUILDING CO Client: _ BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING — Project: -- 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE TIGARD OR Address: ,— --- -- ----_ --- - -- —- ----. ___ —__— --�.— MORRISON BUILDING CO Contractor: SubContractor. LONE STAR NORTHWEST 42 260233 Concrete Supplier: _.. __�-._.___—_____._____�_�—_Truck No. _ Ticket No. M. MCHARGUE 5/60 1 Cast By: _ ^_ _______ —.Cu.Yds. No. CLEAR 64 48 Weather: High: - --_-.-_ Temp.Low: ROOF LEVEL I rx;ation of Placement: — -- -- ---- ------ --�—�—-- -- — _--- ---10:45 66 --.�—_---- ---._ __Test Time: _------_---Concrete Temp: _—_---w— �o S,:engthRequirement: - -- . - - ------ ------ ---PSI0 - —days Slump _____-._Cement Type ----- - 204 3/4" Mix No./No.Sacks -- - -- -- ---- Air Content Aggregaie ----- ----- A(lmix.Amount. Brand: Admix.Amount. _. Brand: _- Set Test @ i Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number _Rec'd nest Load - PSI No. By 7 0388 02/27 03/0 109,350 28.32 3860 14 I KB 14 0388 02/27 03/1 - 28 0388 02/27 03/2 I I cc:CITY OF TIGARD Remarks: Infomration contalned herein Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. C.onstn�ction Inspection&.Related Tests C;ar son Testing, Inc. Geoteclinical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX(503)684-0954 F ebruar} 21 , 1995 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: F-bruary 20, 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue -- 'Tigard. OR INSPECTOR: B. Talley #616 02-20-94 : CTI representative was present at the job site and performed UT inspection on 4 welds at G/1 . No discontinuities were noted. Welds are acceptable according to AWS D1 . 1-94 . Our reports pertain to the material. testes/i.rispected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prion ailtnorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully sub tted, Y N T TING. 1C. s W. Leach ent cc: Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard Z:onstsuction Inspection& Related'lests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechn+.:al Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Dragon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 February 16 , 1995 94- 11.77 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: February 16 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: 10380 SW Casca,le avenue - - Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: E. Busch 02-16-94 : CTI representative took test on concrete, 3500 psi mix, three cylinders , slump 4-1/4" , and temperature 600. 60 yards was p.lac -id. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full , without prior authorization from this -)ff.ici-. Tf there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do riot hesitate to contact this office . Respectfully subm. ted, CARLSON BESTING. I C. Douglas Leacl: President EB: ak cc: Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting 6X12 CONCRETE REPORT OF__- ,TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231, . 31/C39/C1064/C143 Tigard,Oregon 972.81 lest Methods: _ _ __-__.___-__ -_,-- Phone(503)684-3460 02/16 95 94-1177 FAX H 664-0954 Date Molded: - —... ___.-_ , 19------ Job No. -------• Permit No: ----- MORRISON BUILDING CO Client: _ _ _ _ - ----- --------- -. -� BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Project — -------- - - - _-_- 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE TIGARD OR Address' --— - _—�--- --- — —_—_._...------- — -- —��� MORRISON BUILDING CO Conth ictor. -- ---- -----------Sub Contractor: — LONE STAR NORTHWEST 7121 257453 Con+,reta Supplier: ,----- ------Truck No. -.------------------ -Ticket No. .--r—_ ED BUSCH 10/60 1 Cast By: —----- -----..Cu.Yds. ----—---Load No. - - Weather: ----- — --------- Temp.High: -- SLAB ON GRADE 1ST FLOOR Location of Piacement - -- - -- ----- -- - - - - ---- ---- --__—_. 9:00 60 Tlme: _ ---- Concrete Temp: ----- -- 3500 28 4 1/4" I Strength RE-•uirement: - -- ------PSI ® -------days Slump -- Cement Type -- 234 3/4 " Mix No./No.Sacks ----- — -Air Content — --------..—Max.Aggregate --- -- Admix.Amount -__------Brand: _ _— _---_Admix.Amount ---- Set Test@ Register Date Date Total AUnit Report Tested No. Days Number — Rec'd Test LoadArea- _ PSI No. —3y_ 7 0254 02/17 02/23 104,010 28.18 3690 13 JB 28 0254 02/17 03/16 144,550 28.14 5140 17 KB HOLD 28 0254 02/17 03/16 143,210 28.14 5090 17 KB Remarks CC:CITY OF T I GARD Information contained herein is riot to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. C:onstruc!ion Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting 6X12 CONCRETE REPORT OF _._—TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: Phone(503)684-3460 02/16 — 95 94-1177 FAX#684-0954 Date Molded: - , 19---- Job No. ----- ------ Permit No: ---- - - MORRISON BUILDING CO Client: -- ------ --- __ --- - -- - -- - -- BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDIN( Protect: --- - ------ -- - -- - 10380 SW CASCADE AVEN'IE TIGARD OR ddress - ----- - - —�� --— -- MORRISOtJ BUILDING CO Contractor. -- -- -- - --Sub Contractor: --- LONE STAR NORTHWEST 7121 257453 Concrete Supplier: ____ _T_ - -___--_- -Truck Nn _ Ticket No. _ ED BUSCH 10/60 1 Cast t3y: -_.__.._ ---Cu.Yds. No. - Weather - ------Temp High: ---- - ---Temp.Low: -- --- SLAB ON GRADE 1ST FLOOR location of Placement: ------- ----- --- 9:00 60 Test Time: - Concrete Temp: - �3500 28 4 1/4" _ _ I Strength Requirement: --.-.--- - -.— — PSI ® -- days Slump -- Cement Type - 234 3/4 " Mix No./No.Sacks -- -- --- ----Air Content -- ---- — Max.Aggregate ---- - -- Admix.Amount: _-Brand: _ _Admix.Amounti -- ---Brand: -- -- Set Test® Register Date Date Total Unit Report Tested Area No. Days Number Rec'd ?'est Load — PSI No. By, 7 0254 02/17 02123 104,010 28.18 3690 13 JB 28 0254 02/17 03/1 HOLD 0254 02/17 Remarks: cc:CITY OF T IGARD Information contained herein is rot to be reproduced,except in full,wiftut prior authori.:atlon from this office. Construction Impectim&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. 94-1177 JOB NO. ___ Feb 16 , 1995 D.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon^7281 Phone(503)684-3460 REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS FAX#684-0954 MORRISON BUILDING CO Client BEAVERTON HONDA BUILD7�-- "roject ._10380- SII CASCADE AVENI IF T TGARD OR —_ — --- -— — Soil Description 3/4"-0 ROCK_FROM 1 T rARf) SAND_A, GRAVFI__.__—_ Max. Dry Density 1 -3 -`fie Ibs./cu.ft. Optimum Moisture 1 0 5 --- % Method of Test Serial DATE OF TEST ELEV. LIFTFIELD IN-P PLACE DEN ITY % TEST NO. TEST LOCATION FT. NO. % WFT-M DR!y COMPACTION SF 02-10 3 CENTER OF SLAB , EAST HALF _ TOP 10 .0 141 .2 120 .4 96 SF 02-10 4 SOUTH HALF , WEST SIDE _ TOP 9 . 1 139 .8 128 . 1 96 SF 02-101 5 NORTH HALF , WEST SIDE _ TOP 11 .0 142 .1 128 .0 96 ----- ------ — ---- -- - - -- -- Remarks: Grp CITY nF T T GARD Tested by _ri__LC1DEEh11"1M.—_-- _-_____.-_r_- CARLSON TESTING INC. Information contained herein is not to be -eproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. • Construction Inspection&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc• Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684.3460 February 15 , 1.997 FAX U 684.0954 94--1177 P.O. #008864 FIELD INSPECTION REPOR; DATES COVERED: February 15 , 199 5 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue - - Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: B. Scott #619 02-15-94 : CTI representative arrived at project site to perform visual inspection on field welded connr�ctions . Area inspected was at roof level framing. Column to beam connections as detailed 8/S -4 at line 5/F'-E-D-C found to be in accordance with approved plans and AWE; D1 . 1 . Detail 10/S-4 typical column to beam connection at line 3/D-E has been fillet welded on the north and south sides of column cap to bottom beam flange. Due to the column cap being tl same width as the bean flange, the erectors had to grind into the face connection to achieve the effective throat detailed. It appears at the ,e two iocations that the effectiN/e throat is between 3/16" to 1/4" effective throat full length of connection. Detail calls for 1/4" effective throat at these locations. Erectors said they would weld the overhead connection as well . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full , without prior authorization from this office . If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. J Respectfully s m/ftted, LW N// E7S , I1 C. C . D Blas W. Leach P esident BS : ak cc : Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard Construction Inspection A Related Tests Carlson 'Vesting, Inc. UI TRASONIC'PEST REPORT P.O. Box 2.3014 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX#684-0954 Date: 02-07-95 Job Nu: CP-1177 Feb 14 , 1995 Permit No: Client: MORRISON BUILDING CO _ Drawing No: _^ _ --^__ Project: DEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING_ Ultrasonic Unit: DSL 104 _ Address: 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE T IGAR _— Test Method Standard : AWS D 1 .1 SEC 6 Fabricator: _ Acceptance Standard: AWS D1 I .i SEC . s�—_ Description of Joint: _C .P . WITH BACKING 4 Material:STEEL �- Decibels Defect r Distance M E8 x+ - - x lu OJ 04 Weld Identification ¢ �; +a h d 0J g¢ -X" •-y'. +� — — - -- - OP FLANGE W3OX191 X '-F-F Remarks: U, C�TY OF T IGARD A . EWING_ _ Level Il uas W.L ch Level III Technician -— tdent Information contained here+r,is nut to be reproduced,except in full,without prior aul >rzation from this office. CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING R rffE Inspection Line (Rec-O'--Phone): 639-41170 P' one: h.9-4171 Inspection: [' W1LI1✓SCI f.V��Q1(��- ,2z��Ln Footing Susp. Ceiling`� _Sprink. Rough-i i Appr/Sdwlk Foundation Plbg. Unders'ab Mech. Poun�-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain f taming -Plumb. Alarm Water Line i sulation -Meeh. Underflr. Insul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect, Date Requnsted: Z -( 3-C1S N Time:�AM PM Address:1D_')'60 OA� D221�l A. Builder: l'>Vyx Cdmtk -t'069 -62-3 Permit #: P 1 41 THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: C Inspector: % Date: / /C^ _ APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE YCall For Reinsp. 3012 N.E.MINNEHAFIA STREET. UNIT A VANCOUVER,Wt 986631409 FIRE PROTECT'IUN FAX 1206)699-4485 TEL[2061699-4403 February 13, 1995 To: Dave Scott City of Tigard RE: Beaverton Honda The following are responses to the review letter of Beaverton Honda dated 2-6-95. Only the items requiring a response are listed here. Z) The building is an odd shape so it is difficult to get - r(erfect rectangle and still flow as many treads per line as possible. The remote area represents the physically most remote area and the! auxiliary remote area represents an area flowing ah entire line. We feel as though this test the systems hydraulics adequately. D2) Despite nfpa 13 (1991) allows for a density of . 15 gpm we hate provided the requested . 16 gpm. oft, i 31 Riser is existing. 4► Manufacturers cut sheets enclosed. p15 The dry sidewall heads would require only 16 gpm per head and since there is only (1 ) head per line, the calculations should be adequate. 09) Earthquake detail added to drawings . The remainder of the items are either standard installation practices or part of the existing system. If you have any CUrther questions and/or comments please do not hesitate to ca II . Thank You Gerry Linnell. Project Designer SPOKANE,WA OFFICE TACOMA,WA OFFICE FAX[509)926-3708 FAX[206)922-6150 TEL(8091!926-342R PATRFP099CF TEL[206)926-P290 d Carlson Vesting, Ince Consttuction hmpect.ion&Related 7est.s Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Dox 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 February 10 , 1995 FAX k 684-0954 94- 1.177 P. O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: February 7 and 9 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue --- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: A. Ewing #499 02--07-94 : CTT representative visited site to review cracked or laminated W30 x 191 bottom flange at F+4 ' /l . Adequate sizing of this base metal discontinuity hampered by 7/8" plate below beam bottom flange (4/S5) which prevents straight beam exam. Discontinuity is near top surface of bottom flange and just slightly longer than web thickness ( 11/16" ) . Engineer was notified. Also, UT inspected and accepted top flange complete penetration weld at F+4 ' /1 at roof level for W30 x 1.91 . ^2-09-95 : CTI representative provided MT inspection to monitor removal of beam discontinuity in bottom flange at web for W30 x 191 at roof level at F+4 ' /l . Steel subcontractor- removed discontinuity with a carbon arc until reinspection with MT showed no further indications . Per previous discussion with the structural engineer, this discontinuity required repair. Also started visual inspection of fab shop welding on a spot check basis . This spot check reveals : 1 . Weld on one side where welds both sides or all around are called for ( 15/S4) . 2 . Skip welds where welds full length are called for (15/S4 ) . 3 . Single sided fillets where complete penetrat.ir-)n welds are called for ( 15/S4) . 4 . M-' -,sing bolts due to plates fabricated with too few holes drilled into samE, ( 10/S4) . Prior to conducting a more extensive inspection, it is suggested that contractor, engineer, and inspector meet. at site to review these items and then establish a priority list and scope of inspections . Febri.ary 10, 1995 94-1177 Page 2 of 2 Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regardinq this matter_ , please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respec fully sub tted, LS �T STIN' INC:. �{, Av o gl.as W. Leach sident AE: ak cc: Morrison Building Co. City of Tiga,d Carlson Coiistruction Inspection& Related Tests C,a�rlson Testing, T ic. 73eoteclutical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684.3460 FAX 0 684-0954 Fe")ruary 1-0 , 1995 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTIO^r REPORT DATES COVERED: February 10 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building' ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue - - Tigara, OR INSPECTOR: E. Day 4584 02-10-94 : CTI representatives performed inspections at jot site. Roof level framing, bottom flange to beam complete penetration weld connection at F/1 . Ultrasonic examination reveals sound welded quality through base material thickness both beam flange and flange plate. Weld quality meets AWS D1 . 1-94 8 . 15 standards . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any .further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, C S T STi�N , /ANC� o las Leach Pr sident ED:ak cc : Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard Z February 1.0, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Mr. Gerald Linnell Patriot Fire Protection 3012 NF Minnehat-a #A Vancouver, WA 98661 RE: Fire Sprinkler Addition Beaverton Honda 10380 SW Cascade Blvd. Tigard, OR This plan review is based on the 1991 edition of Uniform Building Code Standard 38-1, the National Fire Protection Association Standard No. 24 and the 1993 edition of the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. Hazard Classification: Ordinary Hazard Group 1 Plans for the above referenced project have been reviewed by this office and are not approved for construction as submitted. The following plan review items will need to be revised on the drawings and/or hydraulic calculations and resubmitted for review and approval : 1) The hydraulic most demanding area shall be a rectangular area having a dimension parallel to the branch lines at least 1 .2 times the square root -f the area of sprinkler operation used. The area shown on the plans does not comply with this requirement . At sprinkler head spacing of 10 ft . in the design area, it appears that there should be a minimum of 5 heads calculated on each branch. Section 7-4 . 3 . 1, UBC Std. 38--1 . 2) The design density needs to be increased to . 16 gpm/1500 sq. ft . Figure 2-2 . 1 .1 (b) , UBC Std. 38-1,. 3) Provide riser detail . 4) Provide manufacturer's cut sheets on all of the sprinkler heads and other material installed in the sprinkl -.r system. 5) Verify that the demand of the aide wall sprinklers will not hydraulically exceed the most demanding interior area since they typically have a greater flow required. 13125 SW Nall Blvd., Tigard, OR ?7223 (503) 61'319-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 — s 6) Piping used in the sprinkler system shall comply with the minimum requirements of Table 3-1. i-1, UBC Standard 38-1. No response needed. 7) All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and waterflow switches on all srrinkler systems shall be electrically supervised when the number of sprinklers are twpr.ty or more in Group I, Division I Occupancies or one hundred or more in all other occupancies. Section 3803, OSSC. No response needed. 8) The installing contractor shall furnish to the Building Official written certification that the system was installed, flushed and tested i.n accordance with Section 1-11, Ub: Standard 38-1.. The Contractor's Material and Test Certif.icatia shall be submitted to the field inspector at final inspection of th#a system prior to a final approval. being given. No response needed. 9) Provide detail specifying size, material and method of attachment to the structure of the sway bracing. 10) Only listed ferrous Langers shall be used to support sprinkler piping. Section 3--10. 1. 1 & 2, UBC Standard 38-1. No response needed. 11) Sprinklers shall be installed beneath ducts over 4 ft. wide unless ceiling sprinklers can be spaced in accordance with Table 4-2 .4 . 6. UBC Std. 38-1. Pio response needed. 12) The n.inimum size Hanger Rod shall be 3/8-inch for up to 4-inch pipe, 1/2-inch for up to 6-inch pipe, and 5/8-inch for up to 12-inch pipe. Table 3--10. 4. 1, UBC Std. 38-1. The minimum s=ze U-Hook Rod shall be 5/16-inch for up to 2- inch pipe, 3/8-inch for up to 6-inch pipe, and 5/8-inch for up to 8-inch pipe. Table 3-10.4 .2, UBC Std. 38-1. The minimum size Eye Rod size shall be 3/8-inch for up to 4- inch pipf , 1/2-inch for up to 6-inch pipe, and 3/4-inch for up to 8-inch pipe. Table 3-10. 4 . 3 , UBC Std, 38-1. No response needed. 13) Deflectors of sprinklers under beams shall be located 1 to 4 inches below beams and not more than 20 inches below combustible or noncombustible roof or floor decks. Section 4- 3 . 2 . 2, UBC Std. 38-1. No response needed. 14) The sprinkler system shall be hydrostatically tested at not less than 200 psi for 2 hours, or at 50 psi pressure in excess of the maximum pressure, when the maximum pressure to be maintained in the system is in excess of 150 psi. Section 1- 1.1. 2 , UBC Std. 38-1.. No response needed. 15) The installer shall proparly identify this hydraulically designed automatic sprinkler system by a permanently attached placard indicating the location and basis of design (discharge density over designed are;, of discharge, including gallons per minute and residual pressure demand) at the base riser. Saction 7-1.2; A-7-1.2, UB(- Std. 38-1; See Sample Nameplate in Flqu:"e A-7-1.2 . No response needed. 16) All alarm functions shall be tested. Waterf low detecting devices, including associated alarm circuits shall be tested by an actual waterf low through use of a test connection. Section 3-12.7. 3 , UBC Std. 38-1. No response needed. 17) Tests of drainage facilities shall be made while the control valve is wide open. Test connections, which may also be used as drain pipes, shall be so installed that the valve may be tested wide open. Sections 1-11.4 & 2-9. 1, UBC 38-1. No response needed. 18) Provide and maintain approved spare sprinkler heads and a sprinkler wrench. The u.inlmum number of heads shall be: A) 6 when there is 1-299 heads, B) :.2 when there is 300-1000 heads, C) and 24 when there is over 1,000 heads. These emergency heads, along with the sprinkler wrench, are to be stored in a cabinet next to the sprinkler control valve. Section 3-11.7 , UBC Std. 38-1. No response needed. 19) An approved set of plans st!a .1 be available to the inspector ttt the jok- site at all time:; during construction. Section 303 (b) , OSSSC. No response needed. 20) -Tiongitudl'.nal sway bracing shall be spaced at a maximum distance of 80 feet on center for all feed and cross mains of sprinkler piping. Section 3-5. 3 .5.2, UBC Std. 38-1. No response needed. 21) Each interior sectional control valve shall be provided with a drain connection si7.ed as shown in Table 3-6. 2 . 2 so as to drain that portion of %.he system controlled by the sectional valve. These drains shall discharge either outside or to a drain connection. Section 3-6. 2 . 3 , UBC Std. 38-1. No response needed. Please call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely \ David Scott, P.E. Building Official CITY OF TIGArRD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE �rt� Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 635-4175 Business Fhono: 6394171 Inspection: OYl Footing Susp Ceiling Sprink. R(,,jgh-in Appr/Sdwik Foundation Plbg. U, derslab Mach. Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing -Plumb. Alarm Water Line ��-+rrsU -Mech. Underflr. Insul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect. Date Requested: 5;ZeZ16 �_Time)(,AM NM Address: ���r�U d n j — Builder.�/( � c�_� Permit #: 6 THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: � ' 2" 7 / _ I Inspector: zv Date: P r'PROVED DISAPPROVED 4--APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE __Call For Reinsp. Canstr eUm Ins pection&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O.Box 23614 Tigard;Oregon 97281 Phone(503)GU4-3460 February 9, 1995 FAX 0 684-0954 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: February 8 and 9 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: 10380 SW Cascade Avenue -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: B. Scott #63.9/M. McH:.rgue #614 02-08 & 09-94 : CTI representatives arrived at project site and met with Dave of Morrison Construction. Inspectors were requested to perform ultrasonic inspection on shop fabricated complete joint penetration welds on fabricated beams . Shop beam splices had a heavy shop coat of grey paint. In some areas , this needed to be rer,,-)ved prior to scanning. Several locations were inspected at 2nd Lioor level lines D - E/1 and roof level line D - E - F/1 . Top and bottom fla:.ges and web splices were spot checked and all splices were noted as having rejectable indications per AWS D1 . 1 . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full , without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . RespectfuVf tted . CA S TNC.--. l u las W. Leach Pr. sident BS/MM:ak cc : Morrisrn Building Co. City of Tigard Comistruetiott Inspection & Related Testa Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotecludcal Comuldng P.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 972G1 Phone(50')684.3460 February 9 , 1995 FAX M 684-0954 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: February 8 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: 10380 SW Cascade Avenue -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: M. McHargue #614 02-08-94 : CTI representative was present on site . The following ultrasound inspections were done . 1 . Ultrasound inspection of full penetration weld at beam bottom t'.ange grid G. 3/1 roof level found visual weld acceptable. 2. Ultrasound inspection of indication found at W30 x 191 beam bottom flange to web intersection. Roof level grid 1/F. 1 . Visually the indication appeared to be vertically extending down into the beam bottom flange, running from the web flange intersextion into she outer flange. Upon testing the indication could only be found in that area. A full length scan of the beams bottom flange was done with no indications found. From fuiLher testing it would appear that the indication runs down vertically at about a 50 angle back towards the beam. The bottom of the indication could not be seen with ultrasound to verify the depth. It appears that no laminations exist past the indication found. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is nct to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. 1'.-' ther(- are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully su ed, CIO(R SOP47 TE TI 1 C. las Leach r sident Zl/ MM: ak cc: Morrison Bui.lding Co. City of Tigord Construction Inspection&Related Teets Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O.Boz 29814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 February 8 , 1995 FAX r ee4-0954 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIEI.,D INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: February 6, 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: 10380 SW Cascade Avenue -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: R. Steele 4639 02-06-9-' : CTI r -presentative was present at job site to provide visual inspection. on the following items . 1 . FuJdle welds at grid lines B through E on 3 through 5 , and F to G at 1 through 3 . Welds are acceptable and. in accordance with AWS D1 . 3-89 and print specifications. 2. Button punch of all decking completed grid lines (A and A through F and G, 1 through 5) second floor. 3 . Bolted connections (framing in roof future third floor) completed at beam to beam and beam to column connections (sung tight per engineer) . 4 . Truss to beam welded connections grid lines (A through G at 1 to 3) and (A to F, 3 Lhrough 5) welds are acceptable and in accordance with print specifications and AWS D1. 1-94. Per discussion with Dave Dahlman (project superintendent) concerning periodic and random inspection, he wishes to continue this method until otherwise notified. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . Respectfully sL - Ltted, C LS / T ,STAY LNC. Blas Leach P esident RS : ak cc : Morrison Building Co. City of 'Tigard Construction Inspection&Related'rests Carlson resting, Inc. GmtrAAmicid Coneulting P.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3480 February 6, 1995 FAX 0 884-0954 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FlErD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: February 3, 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: �, „� I -- TigFird, GR INSPECTOR: 602 02-03-94 : CTI representative visited site and performed ultrusonic NDE inspection on full penetration moment geld at top flange of 30 x 191 beam at grid 1/G. 5 . No rejectable indications were noted with UT inspection per AWS D1. 1-94 sections 6 and d . One piping porosity indication was rejected at the surf4ce during visual inspection. Contractor indicated shop welds were not required to be inspected. When engineer, Ralph Turnbaugh was asked to confirm this, he stated that this would be acceptable provided shop was an approved shop. The fab shop is not an approved shop. Engineer review of NDE requirements for shop full. penetration welds is, requested. Access "rat holes" for full penetration welds at ton flanges are not radiused as required per AWS D1 . 1-94 . Engineer stated that these need to be corrected and brought into compliance with AWS D1 . 1-94 . Bac k up bars at full penetration welds which show removal at details 4 and 7/S5 are required at beam bottom flanges only per engineer. Our reports pertain to the material. tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in ful_1, without prior authorization from this office . If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . Respectfully s T bmitted, CA N TESJ, INC. o gl_-1s leach P esident RB: ak cc: Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard C -.mttuct'.on Inspection&Related Tvats Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Conaulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684.3460 February 3, 1995 RECEIV FAX 0 684-0954 94-1177 P.O. #098884 FEB � C) FIELD INSPECTION REPORT COMMUNITY U DATES COVERF.J: February 2 , 1995 P.2OJECT: u11ding ADDRESS : -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: 02-02-94 : CTI representative was present at job site to provide visual insrcction on the following item: 1 . Columns at grid lines F and G on 1 , base plate weld out two locations with angle each side multi pass fillet weld;, tie:,7dinq is i_n accordance to print and engineering specifica;:ions. Welding is acceptable and in accordance to AWS D1 . 1-94 . (Note: UT needed for full penetration welds on beam to column connection. ) Our reports pertain to the material t.ested/inspected only. Information. contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regar.dJ_ng this mattar. please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, C (sident T 'STIN • C . o Leach Pr RS : ak cc : Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard r Carlson Testing, Inc. C,omt""ftm U�&Related Tests Geotechnical Consulting P.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon P7;e81 Phone(603)6e4-3480 FAX 0 884-0954 January 31, 1995 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: January 27 and 31, 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: 10380 SW Cascade Avenue -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: R. Steele #639 01-27-94 : CTI representative was present at job site to provide visual inspection on the following items: 1 . Repair of crack at connection grid line F/5 has been completed and is acceptable. 2 . Weld out on columns at E/5 , C/5 , D/5 , E/5 , and F/5 is complete and acceptable. Furthe- inspection needed as welding is on going at this time. All welds and connections are in compliance with print specifications as well as AWS D1 . 1-94 . 01-31-91; - CTI representative was present at job site to provide visual inspection on th,-� following items : 1 . PuJdle welds on grid lines A through G, 1 to 3 are acceptable and in accordance to AWS D1 . 3-94 and print specifications . 2 . Column weld out on second floor at grid designations A through G on 1 and A through F on 5 are complete and in accordance to AWS D1 . 1-94 and print specifications . 3 . Column weld out on grid designations A through E on 3 need additional over head welding to meet specifications reinspection on this issue needed. January 31 , 1995 94-1177 Page 2 of 2 Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this zr..atter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respect;ully sub fitted, Fesident T STIN ZINC. Do W. Leach ; attachment RS : ak CC . Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard 1 Carlson Testing, Inc. Construction InapeCticm&Related Tests Geotechnical Consulting P.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684.3460 January 30 , 1995 FAX N 684-0954 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: January 10 , 23 , and 24 , 1995 PROJECT: Peaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: ' 0380 SW Cascade Avenue -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: S . Leach 01-10-94 : CTI representa`.ive inspected rebar in 8" masonry wall and 12" masonry wall top lift and founu it to be placed according to specifications and drawings . Witnessed the placement of grout in 8" masonry wall.. A vibrator was used for consolidation of the grout. No samples were taken. 01-23-95 , 8: 30 am: CTI representative inspected rebar in elevator shaft (first 8 ' ) and found it to be placed according to specification and plans . Witnessed the mixing and placement of grout in elevator shaft. No samples were taken. 1 : 30 pm: CTI representative inspected rebar in elevator shaft (second 8' ) and found it to be placed according to plans and specifications . Witnessed the in-ixing and placement of grout in elevator shaft walls . No samples were taken. 01-24-95, 8 : 00 am: CTI representative inspected rebar in elevator shaft wall. (fifth lift) and found it to be placed according to specifications and plans . Witnessed the mixing and placement of grout in elevator s,�dit wall (fifth lift) . No samples were taken. 10 : 30 am: CTI representative inspected rebar in elevator shaft wall top ijtt and found it to be placed according to specifications and plans . Witnessed the mixing and placement of grout in elevator shaft wall . No samples were taken. 10 January 30 , 1995 94-1177 Page 2 of 2 our reports pertain to the maierial tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is no: t, be reproduced, except in f1 1, without prior authorization fium this office , If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, C LSO TESTIN , INC . % CZas Leach P esident SL: ak cc : Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard Construction In spection&Related Teats Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 January 27 , 1995 FAX#r 694-0954 94-1177 P.Q. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: January 26 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: B. Scott #619 01-26-94 : CTI representative arrived at pruject site to perform visual inspection on field welded connections performed by US Steel Erectors . Results of second '.evel framing field weld at column cap to bottom beam flange as detailed on 10/S-4 . Upper column to top beam flange is incomplete at this time. Detail 2/S4 shows column cap to bottom beam flange weld. Also inspected was pilaster to beam connection as detailed on 9/S4 top column to top flange connection is incomplete at this time. Grid F/5 1/8" gas and needs weld,d both sides. Grid E/5 1/8" gap, bolt needs removed and welded full length. Grid D/5 north side needs bolt removed and welded fu]-1. length. Grid C/t bolt fillet welds 1/4" and full length okay. Grid B/5 1/4" gap on both sides, south side has 1/2" crack in the end of weld. This needs repaired. Grid R/3 north okay, south needs welded full length. Grid E/3 south needs wPldec:t full length, north weld is undersized and needs repair. Grid D/3 north and south welds okay. Grid B/3 nor _h and south welds okay. Grid C/3 north and south welds ok&y . Grid 1/A north weld under length. One south weld okay. Grid 1/B north and south weld okay. Grid 1/B north has 1/8" gap and needs welded full length South weld okay. Grid 1/D north has 1/8" gap, south needs welded full length. Grid 1/E north weld okay, south has 1/F" gap. Grid 1/F north weld okay, south weld needs deslagged. Second floor level joist connections to beam. Grid A/1-3 welds okay, 1/8" fillet 2" tong. Grid B/1-3 welds okay. Grid C/1-3 welds okay. Grid D/1- 3 welds okay. Grid E/1-3 welds okay. Grid F/1-2. 8 welds okay. Grid G/1- 1 . 3 welds okay . I January 2.7 , 1995 94 -1177 Page 2 of 2 Field welding still in progress at this time . Further inspection required when completed. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions Yegarding thjs matter. , please do not hesitate to contact this office . Respectfully submitted, CARL N )TESTI INC. Ig' las sW. Leachident BS : ak cc: Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard Co mUuction Inspection Bic Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc• Geotechnical Consulting P.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX 0 684-0954 January 23 , 1995 94-1177 P,O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: January 21, 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: 10380 SW Cascade Avenue -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H. Murphy 01 -21-94 : CTI representative observed installation of epoxy set rebar for 8" CMU wall atop walls of elevator pit. Rebar also epoxy set in adjacent 8" CMU wall. Procedure was to drill holes to min-num embedment (6" ) , clean hobs with brush and compressed a,'-r. mill holes with epoxy (Liquid Roc 300 by Gunnebo) , and set rebar to fill depth while twisting. All work done to manufacturer' s minimum standards . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior -iuthorization from this office . If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTING, IN Douglas W. Leach President HM: ak cc: Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard Construction Inepectirm&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. GWtc�m1 C-WWW % P.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX 0 684.0954 January 3.6, 1995 94-1177 P.O. 4008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: January 14 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue - - Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: Ii. Murphy 01-14-95 : CTI representative verified size and Placement of rebar and cleanliness of cells for today' s grout pour. All appears to be per plans and specifications . Limits of grout placement: 1 . Top out of 8" CMU wall on top of existing wall on A' line from 3 . 5 to 5 . 2. Existing wall on A' line from 4 . 5 to 5 at 4 ' lifts . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full , without prior authorization from this office. If there are any iurther questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTING, INC,' Douglas W. Leach President HM: llo c-*: Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard Construction Inspection&Related Testa Carlson Testing, Inc. Geot-echnical Consulting P.O.Box 23614 Tigard,Oregon 97261 Phone(503)6PA-3460 FAX 0 864.0954 January 13 , 1595 94-1177 P.O. 40J8884 FIELD INSPEC'iION REPORT DATES COVERED: January 13 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: 10380 SW Cascade Avenue - Tigard; OR INSPECTOR: H. Murphy 01-13-94 : CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar and cleanliness of cells for today' s grout pour of 8" and 12" 17MU. All appears to be per plans and specifications . Limits of grout placement: 1 . Final lift of wall ( 12" CMU) on grid .line 1 from F to G. 5 . 2 . 8" CMU wall on A from 3 to 3 . 5 from existing to bottom of new block on A line from 3 . 5 to 5 . 3alance of this wall to be laid todaN and grouted tomorrow weather pending. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full , without prior authorization from this office. If there Ere any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTING, IFC. J Douglas W. Leach President HM: ak cc : Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard (',anetruction Inspection&Related Teats Carlson Testing, In.c. Geoteebrdcat Cbmulting P.O.Box 23914 Tigard,Oregon 972 31 Phone(503)894-3450 FAX N 994-0964 January 11 , 1995 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: January 6 and 9 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue -- Tigard, OR INSPECTOR: H. Murphy 01-06-95 : CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar and cleanliness of cells for today' s grout pour. All appears to be per plans and specifications . This CTI representative witness grout placement. Mason used vibrator during pour. Limits of placement of grout: 1 . 4 ' lift on rear wall on grid line 5 from A to H - 8" CMU. 2 . 4 ' lift. on 12" CMU on grid line 1 from F to G. 5 . 01-09-95 : CT.I representative verified size and placement of rebar vnd cleanliness of cells for today' s 8" CML' grout pour. All appears tn be per plans and specifications . Limits of placement: 1 . Rear wall of addition 6 ' lift, grids A to H+ on line 5 . 2 . Existing wall on A line from 3 to 4 top to bottom between bond L ams and 4 . 5 to 5 , first 4 ' wider bond beam. (Balance atter scaffle removed. ) Mason provided weep holes at bottom of each run tc -'pow evidence of grout placement. Also witnes2,ed above grout placement. Mason used vibrator during pour. January 11 , 1995 94-1177 Page 2 of 2 Our: reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorizatiot: from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submJAted, CAR SON XESTIN 1GC < fug as W. Leach re ident . ak cc : Morrison Building Co. City of Tigard CITy Or T I(3ARD - RECEIPT of PAYMENT RFf F I P'f NO. 195-2604 t 1 CHECK AMOUNT a 116. 73 I ar;Olt; s P-11 T R I OT FIRE PRO TECT i ON CASH AMOUNT a 0. 00 (4I)I)FfiE 8Ei a 301 i' NE. M I NNC.tiAHA 5T, UNIT A PAYMENT DATE a 01 /1 1/95 SUBDIVISION a VANCOUVER, WA 98663-140' i>t 1PPOSiEw OF PAYMENT AMOUNT PAID PURPOSE= IIF PAYMENT AMOUNT h ii i V P1.1IL1)ING PERM ��- ~� 80, 50 FIRE LIFE~ CAFF'Y PLAN CK32. 20 WILD PER 4. 03 FIRE; SPRINKLER Pl_.AN8 IBE;AVE"RTON HONDA, iO3ae.t SW CASCADE- BLVD T117AL AMOUNT PAID - - -> 116. 73 ktruction Inspection&Related Teets Cr s on Testing, Inc. Geotechnical ConsulUng P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 January. �' , 1995 Phone(503)684-3460 FAX 0 684-0954 94-1177 P.O. #OOPd84 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVE.ZED: January 3 , 1995 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue INSPECTOR: H. Murphy 01-03-94 : CTI representative (am visit) verified size and placement of rebar and cleanliness of cells for today' s 8" CMU grout pour. All appears to be per plans and specifications . Walls ready to grout are rear 8 - 16' lift frim F to H on 5 line, 16 - 24 ' lift on 5 line From A to F. Weep holes provided at bottom of lift. Grouting delayed until this afternoon. Mason laying block on 1 line from F to G. Took temperature of mortar and it was 35°. Advised mason to not lay any more until they could get temperature above 40° per code. 01-03-94 : CTI representative (pin visit) was present at site. Mason grouting only from D to H on 5 line using vibrator. Evidence of grout at each weep hole. Temperature of grout is 60°. Advised mason to protect: grouted Nall per. UBC section 2404 (c) 5 . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproOuced, except in xt.11 , without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office . Respectfully submit-ted, WCL J TES's G, INC . (YP ( W. Leach si.dent HM:ak cc : Morrison B,iildirig Co. City of Bea ✓erton Bldg. Dept . Kevin Smith C:omtruction IrWe.-tion&Related Teats Carlson Testing, Inc. Creotedudad Consulting P.O.Wx 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 December 30, 1994 PAY x884-0954 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: December 29 , 1994 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: 10380 SW Cascade Avenue INSPECTOR: H. Murphy 12-29-94 : CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar and cleanliness of cells for today' s grout pour. of 8" and 12" CMU walls . All appears to be per plans and specifications. Limits of grout placement was next 4 ' lift of 8" CMU on rear (south) wall on grid line 5 from A to H and 12" CMU wall on 1 line from F to G. 5 . Mason used vibrator during pour. Advised contractor and mason to review cold weather protection of grouted masonry, UBC section 2404 (C) 5 and act accordingly,. Mason required hi-lift (8 ' ) grouting from now on. UBC allows but must have cl.eanouts provided. See UBC 2404 (F) 1 . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARL,SON TESTING, NC. r, Douglas . L2ach President HM: ak cc : Morrison Building Co. City of Beavertor. Bldg. Dept. - Kevin Smith Construction Inspection&Related Teats Carlson 'Testing, Inc. GicoteAmical Consulthlg P.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684.3460 December 27, 1994 FAX M 684-0954 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: December 27, 1994 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: 10380 SW Cascade Avenue INSPECTOR: H.P. Murphy 12-27-94: CTI representative verified size and placement of rebar and cleanliness of cells for today's grout pour of 8" and 12" CMU walls. Limits of grout placement was rear wall on 5 line A' to H+ including 12" wall on 1 line between F & G. Notes Last 26 ' loft of 8" CMU wall on 5 line from Gt- to H+ was 8' lift (mason provided holes at bottom of lift to show grout evidence) balance of wall was 8' to 12 ' lift (4 feet) . Also witnessed grouting of same. Mason used vibrator during pour. CTI representative obtained sample, took temperati.re, and cast one set of (3) 4X8 for grout strength tests. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTING, 7IC. Douglas W. Leach President HPM:mm cc: Morrison Building Co . Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechn;cal Consulting 4 X 8 GROUT REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 2 1814 UBC 24-28 Tigard,Oregon 9.'281 Test Methods: -_ -----..—__-�- _--- -----.--- Phone(503)684-3460 12/27 94 94-1177 FAX #684-0954 Date Molded: , 19— Job No. ---- Permit No: MORRISON BUILDING CO Client: _ --- -- - -------.._.. -- -�_.—^ BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Project 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE Address — --- — -. _— ---- --.-- _�� — - MORRISON BUILDING CO MOLALLA MASONRY (;onirar;tor. _ _ - -----Sub Contractor: - ConcreteSuppiipr -VIESKO _ Truck No. ___._26 Ticket No. 01-004381-� Cast By: H.P. MURPHY -------` Cu.Yds. —_9/9 ,-- OVERCAST/RAINY 55 44 Weather: Temp.High: -- __Temp.Low: 8" CMU WALL (REAR ), 3RD 4FT LIFT r cation of Placement: — - - ------ -.-------- -- Test Time: 11_30 ----- - Concrete Temp: _ 4_ ______� 2500 28 8" I Strength Requirement: -- ---PG( * ________- ays ump - `Cement Type -- KPB3024/7SK 3/8" Mix NoJNo.Sacks Air Content ------- -- Max.Aggregate Admix.Amount: __,Brand: __—Admix.Amount: _©rand: Set Test® Register Date Y Date Total Area Unit Re ort Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load PSI No. By 7 9359 1 12/28 01/03 25,643 16 o4 1600 10 JB 28 9359 I 12/28 01/24 56,142 1 16.01 3510 12 1 JB 28 9359 12/28 01/24 54,928 15.97 3440 12 JB Remarks rC CITY OF TIGARD_-___ Information contained herein is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. w� Construction Inspection&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. cyeotwludad Consulting P.U.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(803)684-34611 December 20 , 1994 FAX 684.0954 94-1177 P.U. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: December 19, 1994 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue INSPECTOR: G Cooper 12-19-94 : CTI representative inspected rebar placement in footing on line 5 from F to H. Clearances, ties, sizes, etc . , comply with plans and sperfications . Also inspected the installation of epoxied dowels as per change order 3 and find that they were installed in accordance with manufacturer' s recommendations and industry standards. Recommend acceptance for use in project. Our reports pertain to the material tested/insppered only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduc:d, e;.cept in full , without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesirate to contact this office . Respectfully submitted, CA N TESTI G, INC. b ' D ugla W. Leach resident GC: ak cc : M--.- r lsorl Building Co. Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotcxhnical Consulting 6X12 CONCRETE REP(ZT OF TEST SPECIMEIvo ---------- P.U. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C1064/C143 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: __ —___-. __— Phone(503)684-3460 12/19 94 94-1177 FAX#684-0954 Data Molded: _ , 19___— Job Na. Permit No: MORRISON BUILDING CO Client: -•-- --. BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Project: 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE Address: — MORRISON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: ---- --_Sub Contractor: VAN DOREN CONCRETE 53 54992 Concrete Supplier --._ _—_.__—Truck No. — Ticket No. G . COOPER 7 .5/12 1 C'IstBy: _�— —�__�___ _Cu Yds. ____.__�-----Load No. OVERCAST 60 44 Weather _-.__Temp.Nigh: __Temp.Low: FOOTING LINE 5 TO END , F TO H Location of Placement: 2= 10 60 __Test Time: --_ -. __ ____ _-_Concrete Temp• 3000 2H T Strength Requirement: .—PSI O --- ------- days Slump __Coment Type — 3/4 " Mix Vo./No.Sacks _ --Air Content ------.-------- Max.AggregatA Admix..Anrount: __—__ —__.___-.,.Brand: — _-Admix.Amount: Brand: _ Std Test@ Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested too Days Number Rec'd Test Load PSI No. By 7 9200 12/20 12/2 89,879 7.8.33 3170 9 JB 28 9200 12/20 01/1t 116,97U 28.28 4140 11 JB 28 9200 1?/20 01 /1(-. 121,580 28.28 4300 11 JB I I Remarkscc: CITY OF TIGMD . Information contained herein Is not to be reproduced,exrept in full,withoL'prior authorization from this office. CConstruction Inspection &Related Tests ,arlson Testine- Inc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 4 X 8 GROUT TES, SPECIMENS P.O.Box 23814 UBC 24-28 Tigard,Oreon 97281 Fest Methods: Ph ne(503)684-3460 94 94-1177 FAX#684-0954 Dale Molded: JO)No. - Permit No: MORRISON BUILDIN: CO Chant BEAVERiON HONDA BUILDING Project 10360 SW CASCADE AVENUE Addrv,s: MORRISON BUILDING CO MOLALLA MASONRY Contractor. Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: VIFSKO 26 ._Ticket No. 01-004381 P.P . MURPHY -.--.---Cu.Yds. 9/9 —Load No.1. 1 OVERCAST/RAINY 55 44 weather; .---.—Temp.High: .______Temp.Low: 8" CMU WALL ( REAR ), 3RD 4FT LIFT Location of PlacerT,,nt: - Time: 11 :30 Concrete Temp: -64 2500 28 131, T Strength Requirement: ----.PSI 0 ___—days Slump ____Cement Type KPB3024/7SK 3/81, Mix No./No.Sacks -------Air Content Aggregate Admix.Amount: —Brand: Amount: --------Brand: Set I lest® Register Date Date Total Area Unif Report j Tested No. Days --Number Rec'd -.-Test --Load PSI _-No, [_ By 9359 12/28 01/03 25,643 16 .04 1600 10 JB 28 9359 12/28 01/24 16 .0 28 9359 12/28 01/24 16 .0 llorimiks InImmitinn contained herein Is not to bb reproduced,exropt in full,without prior milhori,ation from this office. Cons"ctim Inspection 6 Related Tests Carlson TestinL Inc. Geotechnical ltin$ TEST SPECIMENS REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE P.O.Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1.231/C31/C39/C1064/C1ti"' Tig3rd,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: -- -- _ Phone(503)684-3460 12/19 94 94-1177 FAXp6840954 Date Molded: __---- . 19.. Job No. - Permit No: - -- MORRISON BUILDING CO Client — --- ----- -- - _— BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Project: _.—�_—�.---- ..--- - ---- - —- -- 10380 SW Cf^i;CADE AVENUE Addrens: ---- --- -- ---- ---- -- MORR I SON CONSTRUCTION --- __Sub Contractor: - -- - Contractor. - -- ---.------------- VAN DOREN CONCRETE 5354992 Concrr;d Supplier: _____— _ __--^------truck No. __ _Ticket No. G . COOPER _-Cu.Yds. 7 .5/12 —Load No. 1-- Cast By: ------ OVERCAST 60 44 Weather: _. _ —_—.— —._ Temp.High: ___—Temp.Low: ----- FOOTING LINE 5 TO END , F TO H Location of Placement: — ------- _--- - _— ----- -- 2: 10 60 ---__._.-._Test Time: ------Concrete Temp: _ -_- 3000 28 5" I Strength Requirement ____--- ---------- -----PSI ® _.__..._-_ days Slump ___—_-Cement Type ---- 3/4" Mix NoJNo.Sack; _-- --- —Air Content ----- - — --- ---Max.Aggregate — ---- Admix Amount: —____—__—Brand: -Admix.P nount — Set Test Regicrer Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load PSI No. By 7 9200 12/20 12/2 89,879 28,33 3170 9 JB 28 9200 12/20 01/1 28 9200 12/20 01/1 _ I cc: _ 11emarks: ------ -- — --- - i.,r�....,u.., ..,r,�.,..r►,.,.nt�{c rnd In hp rerxnrl�lced pxcnM in full withnut prior authorization from this office. December 13, 1994 William S. Bailey CITY OF TIGARD SERA Architects, P.C. 123 NW Second Avenue OREGON Portland, OR 97209 Project: Beaverton Honda- Plan Check #4-29C 10380 SW Cascade Blvd. Subject : Modification to Sections 3306 (m) and 2003 (b) (1991 UBC with Oregon Amendments) The purpose of this letter is to address the con, ern of installing an exterior stairway into a yard where protection of openings are required. The second sentence of Section 3306 (m) states, "Exterior stairways shall not project into yards where openings are not permitted or protection of openings is required. " In addition, Section 2003 (b) says, "Openings in exterior walls shall confo:-m to the requirements of Section 504 (b) and shall be protected by a fire assembly having a three-fourths-hour fire- resistive rating when they are less than 20 feet from an adjacent property line or the center line of a public way. " Therefore, the building code does not allow Exterior stairways within 20 feet from adjacent property lines for 3N construction. However, pursuant to your request dated December 1, 1994, the City of Tigard will. grant a modification (Section 1.06) of the applicable code gections to allow the proposed exterior stairway to be located 10 feet from the property line, subject to the following: 1. Extend the four-hour masonry wall along the adjacent property line 3.0 feet beyond the end of the building overhang. This wall shall extend to the full height of the existing wall . 2 . The exterior stairway shall be constructed of iicombustible materials. 3 . When the future third floor is constructed, all gl izing in :ae exterior walls shall comply with the requirements of Section 3306 (k) . If you have any questions or ccacerns, please do not hesitate to call . Sincerely, )W04_1&YWAI�111 Mark Burrows Plans Examiner FAX (503) 684-7297 pc: George Steele Building Inspector mb/modl[-doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 — ®e A►ucrtRe,-rvne Y Cop rrrreuoR s PLANNING December 1, 1994 Mr. Dave Scott City of Tigard Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. P,O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Beaverton Honda Motorcycle Showroom 10390 SW Cascade Blvd. 'Tigard, OR 97213 SERA Joh No. 934921 Dear Mr. Scott: As per our phone conversation on November 22, we are providing a written request for a code variance concerning the exterior stair for the Beaverton Honda Motorcycle Showroom. It is our understanding that the proposed solution discussed with you and Mark Burrows is acceptable. Please indicate your acceptance by signing in the space provided below and return a copy of the signed cover letter for our files If you have an questions regarding this issue, please call me. Thank you very much for your prompt action on this matter. Sincerely, SE ZA ARCHITECTS, P.C. UWillianiB;dley Associate i2 -IS-711 Accepted y Date cc: Steve Ba.irstad, Morri,on Construction PRINCIPALS GEORGE C.SHELDON,AIA DONALD D EGGLESTON,AIA,CSI SIRA ARCHITECTS PC 23 NW SECOND AVENUE PORTLAND,OREGON 97209 PHONE 503-2286444 FAX 503-228.6911 BUILDING CODE APPEAL FORM: Beaverton Honda Motorcycle Showroom BUILDING CODE SECTION: U.B.C., 1993 Oregon Edition, Sec. 2003 (b) & Sec. 3306 (m) REQUIRES: Openings in exterior wall shall be protected by a 3/4 hour Ere resistive assembly if within 20 feet of an adjacent property line. Exterior stairways shall not project into yards where openings are not permitted or protection of openings is required. PROPOSED DESIGN: The alternate design proposes to construct a 4 hour masonry wall along the adjacent property line extending 10' beyond the end of the building overhang. The exterior stair will be constructed of non-combustible materials and located 10' perpendicular from the 4 hour wall and 20' from the edge of the wall extension. See attached plan. REASON FOR ALTERNATE: The exterior stairway is serving as the second exit for the second floor and is within the 20' setback which is not permitted by Sec. 3306 (in). The four hour masonry wall along the property line will be protected the stair from any fire event that may occur on the adjacent property. SIGNED: _ _ SIGNED: Appellant For City of Tigard BUILDING CODE APPEAL FORM (Second Sheet) NI F e. , , , , N. , LINE OF DN OVERHANG e ABOVE •? PROPERTY LINE i SIGNI-1): . _ ___��-- -- SIGNED: Appellant For City of Tigard INBPECPION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department 13125 811 Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Lina (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4�Business Phones 639-4171 InspectionsCZ Tooting Plbg. Underslab Mach. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk ' Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINALS Post/Deas Struct. San. Sewer �: aeinq -Bldg. Post/Deas Mech. Ralr Drain InsulatLon -Plumb. Pl.bq. Underrloor Nater Luse / Oyp. M. -Hoch. Data Requested:, //ll I // J Tis L�� PH Address s C)3 v C��"L�, -�''_ �! "^Permit f s Bullders__ -Z -9 ,2: TSE FOLLONINO CORRECTIONS 1185 RBQUIREDs oo Inspectors_ Dates / _ ROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVRD SUBJECT TO ABOVE _`Call For Reinsp. is i INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department. 13125 SW Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 972 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone)t 639-4175 Business Pho a 639-4171 Inspection. _ Footing Fib . Underelab Mach. Rough--in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Jut Gas Line FINAL. Post/Beats Struct. San. Bower remin -Bldg. Post/Beam Mach. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbq. Underfloor Mater Line Gyp. Bd. -Neth. Date Requestede- ���-lr j�__Time, -_K_AM PM Address t 16� a V -- Permit #t� Builders � TNR FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. ZZ euh Inspector:-_ - Datet�� ��y APPROVED _ _ DISAPP D �- APPROVEb SUBJECT T't ABOVE -- _Call. For Reinep. CITY CSF TIGARD COMMUNITY D'nVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 13128 SW Hall Blvd.T19ard,Orpon MOWN N (503)639-4171 PLUMBING PERMIT PERMIT 4. . . . . . . : PL.M94­0096 b39--4171 DATE ISSUED: 11/10/94 PARCEL: 1S1358A-02,800 '_1I TE ADDRESS. . . : 10080 SW CASCADE BLVD SUBDIVISION. . . . : ZONING: I--P BLOCK. . . . . . . . . . . LOT. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . CLASS OF WORK. . :AUD GARBAGE DISPOSALS. . : MOBI L_E HOME SPACES. : _—`— TYPE OF' USE. . . . :COM WASHING MACH. . . . . . . : BACKFLOW F'REVNTRS. . : OCCUPANCY GRP. . :Bc_ FLOOR DRAINS. . . . . . . . TRAPS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . STURIES. . . . . . . . :C' WATER HEATERS. . . . . . . CATCH BASINS. . . . . . . : 1 LOUNDRY TRAYS. . . . . . : SF RAIN! DRAINS. . . . . SINKS. . . . . . . URINALS. . . GREASE TRAP'S. . . . . . . . LAVATORIES. . . . . : OTHER FIXTURES. . . . . : 1. . ruB/SHOWE RS. . . . : 13EWER LINE (ft ) . . . . : Wt1 rE R CLOSETS. . : WATE=R LINE (ft ) . . . . DISHWASHERS- -- RAIN DRAIN ;ft ) . . _ : Remzr-ks : Deaver-ton Honda-- constro.fct a tvro -stony 4�ddition to the existing bl.uldin 9- other- fixto.ares= foot, drains Owner: ___.__.._____._.______.____._______________._____.______- ___. F'LES LANPHERE E_NTE.RPR1 SEG, INC. type amount by date recpt 12505 SW BROADWAY PRMT $ 9-7. 50 JF 11 /10/9' — F'I_CK $ 24. :38 JF 1- 1/ 10/94 - BEAVE.RTON OR 97005 5PCT $ 4. 88 JF 11/ 10/94 Phone #: 643-5577 MP M I L.WAUK I E PLUMBING PO BOX 39:3 C;LACKAMPS OR 97015 Phone #: 244--6600 f 126. 76 TOTAL. Reg 5002 ---- --- REQUIRED INSPECTIONS ---- -- This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in too R crk_rq h- i n I n s p _ Tigard Municipal Code, State of Ore. Specialty Codes and all other Top-•o l_rt I n s p applicable lows. Rli wnrk will be done in accrrdance with Rain Drain I n s p approved plans. This permit will expire if work is not started Final IT)apectiOT) within 188 days of issuance, or if work :s suspended for more than 1N, ails. Permittee Si gnat 1_rre : I <,st_red key : Call for inspection — 639-4175 City'of Tigard PLUMBING PERMIT Planck/Rec. # 13125 sw Hail Blvd. APPLICATION Permit # 6MN-011596 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 scnpbon ORS 614.21.610 QTY PRICE AMT 4d regg J?�' `W FIXTURES Sia �✓ va �— I ub or ower Cbia. 7.50 — showerUwe Aww" — a er Closet Owner wa Uilrbage Disposal 7.0 wasting miclin4i 7.0 Floor Drainfl' a tx ReaRF Occupant ME Laundry Hoorn I ray final Mor Fixturp -- — 7.50D c (Contractor ____, MISCELLANEOUS J So~ Ist 100' •'M sewer-ea, e errvloe�at 100 r. y a0w^Vk"that I have read this applation,that lie Water Service on.Addit.200' 15.00 inlormadon given is correct,that I am the owner or r uthorized agent o1 the owner,ftt pltns subrtdtled are in compliance with State lows,that I Storm a Rein Drain 1st 100' 30.00 am regwtered tvilh the Consbuctlon ContracWt Board,that the number Storm d Rain Main Addil. 100' 1h.00 given Is correct (if exempt from State registration,please give reason below.) Mobile Home Space 25.00 back Flow Prevention _ Devioe or And-Pollution Device 7.50 Any Pop or Waiste Not Connected to a Fixtura 7.50 Uei7c"nbo work new a a ra n - repair U Besin 50 to be donne residential Q ren-residential O - �40.00- Insp,of Exist.Plumbing per hr SpedalN Requested Inspections per hr Existing trod Kain rain,single anw building'x propiptly dwelling 16.00 Residential w rrevenh-n Proposed usedevices 15.00 d building;or progeny xcep r+ss n ec ow prwenNon d Wcea) --�-- NOTICE 'Minimum Fee$25.00 SUBTOTAL 117 S PERMITS BECOME VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION 6%SURCHARGE -719 AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 160 DAYS,OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED 3 FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS PLAN REVIEV!215%OF SUBTOTAL COMMENCED. '� -• TOTAL �,,.Z �p 7C Sp dal Conations - - -- Date issued` by IfMu�wr+rr fltrr..wN. LJ I OP IJbf-INA) 10 1A fW 1,11, 1°IIYMEN1 1`01 1111 NI 1. c 6:'"58630 c;H1-. K HIVIL .IN I m 1.L-'6. 16 t4 IMF 0 PIP !='LUMBI 3 GO f.' ill HM1 i1IN t s N. 11.10 F1DOPF'S S e 15�,AA HE-- SeND DRIVE, PAYMEN 11 [)ATF:. � A ) / 10/94 A® Box 393 81,1131)1VIsII:N e cl..r•1cK1aMr�fc, r1r� 4 701 g'r t of N'MY MF N'1 AMOUNT Pf-111) P1.110-1.1141 Ill- Pf 4 YMF--N 1 I-41VIO IN I PAID F-i l+MIS-1—N,L-3 f!E.fZM 97. 50 still 11 F'F R F'I ON CHECK f-F. 84. 3A 141 11Vi:HICoN N1:iNI)1.1:' 1414 RISO 04 1 i V,A 1 a)I- tki VV 1�4►{..pl, 1•li'•IflllhtT' 1!111.1) , T.r!1�, 7f,. Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testis? Inc. Geotechnical Consulting 6X12 CONCRETE R_FPOgT OF TEST SPECIMENS —— ---- P.U. oox 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: _ __ __ _—_._�_—_ Phone(503)684-3460 11/04 94 94-1177 FAX N 684-0954 Date Molded: --_ , 18------- Job No. ____ _ Permit Nx MORRISON BUILDING CO Client: _- - -- - --— - ---- BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Project: 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE Addr6ss MORRISON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: --- _——..------ --- -- -----_ .----------Sub Contractor: VAN DOREN CONCRETE Concrete Supplier: ------------Ticket No. Cast By: CLIENT--------- ---Cu._ Yds. _ — _Load No. RAINY 52 39 Weather, _------_-_- Temp.High: --__-_Temp.Low: ELEVATOR PIT SLAB Location of Placement: — ------- — ---------------- Telt Tkne: —_-----------Concrete Temp: 3000 28 1 Strength Requirement: -------— PSI 0 ----days Slump - - _. Cement Type Mix No./No.Sacks -- _-- Air Content ----- Max.Aggregate Admix.Amount: Brand: -Admix.Amount: Set Test® Register Dat9 +DateTotal Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Rev'd Load Area PSI No. by 7 8429 11/08 ,198 28.31 3120 6 JB 28 8429 11/08 12/02 126,360 28.34 4460 8 JB 28 8429 11/08 12/02 129,050 28.34 4550 8-,----JB— Remarks: JBRemarks: Cc: Information contained herein is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior authorization from this office. I r --'"instruction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing nC. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS — P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39 Tigard,Oregon 972.81 Test Methods: _ _ — _ Phone(503)684-3460 11/04 94 94-1177 FAX N 684-09.54 Date Molded: _ _ , 19--- Job No. — Permit No: MORRISON BUILDING CO Client: - --- ----- — ---- -- — ,--_ I BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Project: — — — — -- --——------ --- i 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE Address: —�— — - --------- -- MORRISON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: ----.-----Sub Contractor: VAN DOREN CONCRETE Concrete Supplier: Truck No. _ __ricket No. Cast By: — CLIENT -----Cu.Yds. _ Load No. _— RAINY 52 39 Weather: Temp.High: ----Temp.Low: ELEVATOR PIT SLAB Location o1 Placement: — —-- -- — Test Time: — Concreta Tamp: _ — 3000 28 I SSrength Regcirernent: days Slump —_Cement Type Mix No./No.Sacks — Air Content - Max.Aggregate -- Admix.Amount: L ._- _ Brand: —_ Admix.Amount: _.__---- —Brand: — _— — Set Test® Register Date Date Tole! Area Uni± Report Tested No. Days Number Recd I Test toad — — _ PSI _ No. —By 7 8429 11/08 11/11 88,198 28.31 3120 6 JB 28 8429 11/08 12/0 28 8429 X1/08 12/0 i i Remarks: cc: Information container)herein is not to be repro.luced,except in full,without prior authorisation from this office. C,oss�cion rnepeeuon&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geo>wludm:Cotibulting P.O.Box 23814 TigaW,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)6843460 FAX:1684-0954 iTovember 4 , 1_,94 94-1177 P.O. #005884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERE'): November 4 , 1994 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Casc&Ae Avenue INSPECTOR: B. Suminski #391--) 11-04-94 : CT1 representative checked rebar at the elevator pit slab. The water stop is being placed during the pour. The rebar was rlaced according to plans provid(.d. Our reports pertain to tho matefial tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, exc:.:pt in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTINO, ,TNC. Douglas I ,.ach President BS/ecp cc: Morrison Building Co. r (,oAction hi specUon&Related Tests Carlson resting, Inc. ceaedutical CmundUng P.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 November 1, 1994 FAX 0 684-0954 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: November 1, 1994 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS: 10380 SW Cascade Avenue INSPECTOR: H. P. Murphy #544 11-01-94: CTI representative verified size and placement of reber and cleanliness of cells of 8" CMU for today's grout pour. All appears to be per plans and specifications . CTI representative advised Contractor and Mason to cover wall, to protect from rain. Wall poured was damp. No water was standing in bottom of lift, however. CTI representative witnessed grout placement. Mason used vibrator during pour. Limits of placement was rear wells, 2nd 4' lii.t (4-8 ' ) on Grid Line 5, f Yon, A' to G' . Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information container: herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office . If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do nothesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CHR SO 'VESTING " INC. O las W. Leach esident HPM/ecp cc : Morrison Building Co. Construction Inspection&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(5031684-3460 FAX X 684-0954 Octooer 21 , 1.994 94-1177 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: October 20 , 1994 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Buildi.n,, ADDRESS: 10380 sW Cascade Avenue INSPECTOR: J. Woolf #486 10-20--94: CTI representative checked rebar for Isit 4 ' lift for 8" CMU wall construction at west side of building . Contractor notified to insure four #6 verticals at pilasters with proper 60 bar diameter lap. CTI representative cast one set of (3) 4x8 grout samples for 7 cubic yards sack mix '_rom Viesko. MTchanical vibrator was used. Our reports pertain to the materiEl tested/inspected only. Information cont eined herein is not to be reprodl:ced, except in full, without prior au'--horiration from this office. If there are any further ques,�ions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfuily submitted, CARLSON TESTING, I (. i Douglas W. Leash President JW/ec.) cc : Morrison Building Co. r Construction Inspection & Related Tests Carlson Testing, nC. Geotechnical Consulting 4 X 8 GROUT REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS - - P.O.Box 2391.1 UBC 24-28 Tigard,Or9gon 97281 Test Methods: __ Phone(503)684-.A60 10/20 94 94-1177 FAX M 684.0954 Date Molded: _— - _ •, 19— -- Job No. . -- Permit No: -- --.-------- -- -- MORRISGN BUILDING CO Client: --- BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Project: 10380 SW CASCADE, AVENUE Address: -- Contractor: -__ -Sub Contractor: - - --- --------- ---- ----- - Concrete Supplier: VIESKO ,- _Truck Ne 24- _-^__TlcketNo. _ 2920 Cast By: _�_ 1J00LF -Cu.Yds. —_ 7 __.�_--Load No.1 OVERCAST/RAINY 63 48 Weather: -- _---Temp.High: .-__ Temp.Low: �— IST 4 FT , LIFT 8" CMU WEST WALL Location of Placement: - - ---- -- -- 1.2: 30 65 -.. __- ----------- Test Time: — Concrete Temp: 2000 28 FLUID 7 Strength Requirement: -.-.-----.-- - -- PSI to -----.—days Slump -- Cement Type - Mix No./No.Sacks - --_-- -Air Content ---- -- ------ Max.Aggregate ------ ------ - Admix.Amount: _ --._Brand: Admix.Amount: Brand: -_-- Set Test® Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load PSI No. By 7 8080 10/24 10/2. 27,408 16.18 1690 4 JB 28 8080 10/24 11/1. 55,232 16.25 3400 7 JB 1101-E) Z8 8080 10/24 11/17 54,739 16.25 3370 7 JB Cc . Remarks: - — ---.--- ----- --- - ---- ---- --- -- Informatim contalrW hore'n Is not to be reproduced,except in full,without prior anthorizatlon from this office. truction In T Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing, . le. Geotechnical Consulting 3 ORT OF 4 X 8 GROUT TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 UBC 24-28 reit Methods: Phone(503)684-3460 — - — 10/20 94 94-1177 FAX N 684-0954 )ate Molded: — , 19 Job No. _—_ Permit No: -----------------__— MORRISON BUILDING CO lent: --- - BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE \ddress: r--- -- ------ — -- .ontractor: —- — lub Contractor: -- -- - ;oncrete Supplier: _V I ESKO Truck No. 24.--_----_.Ticket No. _. 2920 _ Ast By: _,T . WOOL.F -- _Cu.Yds. __ Load No.1-- OVERCAST/RAINY 63 48 Nenthec ____ _—Temp.High: — _-..------femp.Law: :ST 4 FT , LIFT 8" CMU WEST WALL oration of Placement -- —`"— -- 12: 30 65 ----_._-_ Test Time: __" :oncrete Temp: — - 2000 28 FL"U'iD I )Irengtti Requirement: -- PSI 0 -- -days Slump - ------.-- . Convent Type — 26 3/N" viir.No./No.Sacks ----- --_ Nr Content ----- ---- Max.Agiregate ---.---- WmN.Amount: ----Brand* drnix.Amount: Brand: -- Set Test® Register Date Date Total Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recd Test Load _ Area PSI No. By 7 8080 1012.4 10/2 27,408 16.18 1690 4 JB 28 8080 1C/24 11/1 I ir)I.f 8080 10/2.4 Cc,: 1�rnarks: --- -------- - —-- - -- ------ 4 I�E6TION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department 13124 M Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Lina (Rec�4—Pho/ne,)t 6339-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection:��Imr-A d x i - &YZL 1' Footing Plbg. Underslab Mach. Rough--in Appr/Sdwlk found. Plbg. Top Out Cas Line FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Mach. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. f Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line /G Gyp. Bd. -Mach. /Z Date Requested: /u !- - /�7- Times ,AN PM Address:� yt 1-:Z�t-CSG 6"_�`ermit 6 / r(, KS'a -011 - Builder: l�-L(,�'- 1/203 - ZC�� _— (/ THE POLLOMINC CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: 74 Inspector: _ fL —� Dater __AFPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE call For Reinsp. Construction Inspection&Related Tests Ua son 'Testing, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting P.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684.3460 FAX N 684-654 October 5 , 1994 94-1 ',77 P.O. #008884 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT DATES COVERED: October 3 , 1994 PROJECT: Beaverton Honda Building ADDRESS : 10380 SW Cascade Avenue INSPECTOR: E. Day 4584 10-0: -94: CTI representative performed inspections at the jobsite, limited to verifying rebar placement and making test specimens. Fpproximately 14 cubic yards of Van Doren 3000 PSI 3/1" aggregate -oncret% will be placed in footings Grid 1/A through F and Grid 3/B through D. Reinforcing steel placement conforms to plans . One set of (4) 6x12 cylinder test specimens made from Load 1, 4" slump, 74°F at 12: 35 PM. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full , without prior <<uthorization from this office . If there are any further questions regarding this matter, ;Tease do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully su mitted, C L,S TEST G, INC. t, glas W. Leach President F.D/ecp cc: Morrison Building Co. T Construction Inspection &Related Tests Carlson Testing; nc. Geotechnical Consulting REPORT OF 6X12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O.Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C143./C1064 Tigard,Oregon 87281 Test Methods: _ Phone(503)684-3460 FAX k 684-0954 10/03 19 94 Job No. 94-1177 _ Permit No: Gate Molded: , ------_— Client: MORRISON BUILDING CO — - -- Project: -- BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE Address: — --- --- — - Contractor: — MORRISON CONSTRUCTION - VAN DOREN DOREN CONCRETE 4`�B72 Concrete Supplier: ---_..__Tn>ck No. _.----_ _i Icket No. - Cast By: -__ ED DAY Cu.Yds. -`1 4 Lo•.,d No.1— `>Uf,1NY 75 52 Weather: _-- --- ---__ _ —_Temp.High: ---------Temp.Low: ------- FOOTINGS GRID 1/A -F ; GRID 3/13 - D Ltx;ation of Placernent: - - --- -------------- ------ 12: 35 74 __-- ___- �. ---- ---- --Test Time: - —___Concrete Temp: ----_- - -._-- 3000 $ 411 T--TT Strength Requirement: -- -- --- -- PSI 0 - -------. .days Slump Cement Typo ----.--.---- 3000 Mix No./No.Lacks Air Content — --- -------- Max.Aggregate — ------ Admix.Amount: _ Brand: _---Admix.Amount: _ ._-_ __._ ------Brand: '1�otTesti Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No- Days Number Recd Test Load PSI No. By 7 7703 10/07 10/10 87,901 28.32 3100 2 JB 28 7703 10/07 1.0/31 130,220 28.35 4590 5 JB 28 7703 10/07 10/31 128,660 28.35 4540 5 JB 1101,-D 28 7703 10/07 10/31 331,140 28.35 4630 5 JB cc �Iemarks: __ --- ---- - — — l l TNT 1 i,r F MENT PER PLANS informetfon contained herein is not to be reprodua+d,except In full,without prior author 7-don from this office. Construction Inspection 6 Related Tests Carlson Testing-Inic. Geotechnical Consulting 9EPORTOF6X12 CONCRETE TESTSPEQIMEN�S P.O. Box 23814 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C143/C1064 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test'l-Nods: — —— Phone(503)684-3460 FAX M 684-0954 94-1177 Date Molded: 10/03--- , 19 94 Job No. _ _—. Perrrit No: :hent: -------------- — MORRISON BUILDING CO - - ---- ---- --- -- BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE_ Address: -- --- —` -T MORRISON CONSTRUCTION Contractor: -- Sub Contractor: ---- --- VAN DOREN CONCRETE 1 49872 Concrete Supplier: Truck Nr. _------Ticket No. .---_ ED DAY 14 1 Cast By: __ — —Ct, Yds. _ Load No. _ SUNNY 75 52 weather: ---- -- -- ------Temp.High: — Temp.Low: -- FOOTINGS GRID 1/A --F ; GRID :3/13 — D _a;ation of Placement: — — -----.----- ---- — � 12'35 74 --_ Test Time: __--.___Concrete Temp: M-3000 . -- -- —_— ----- --- 28 4 I- I Strength Requitement --- -- PSI ® _----_--days Slump ._ _____ _- Cement Type ----- ;3000 3/4 " Mix NOJNo.Sacks Air Content --- -,---- Max.Aggregate —.- ------- Admix.Amount: __ —3rand: --- ----Admix.Amount: ------_Brand: _ Set Test Register Date Date Total I AUnit Report Tested No. Days Num Area er Rec'd Test _Load _ PSI o. B — 7 7703 10/07 10/10 r3; ,901 28.32 3100 2 JB 213 7703 10/07 10/31. 28 7703 10/07 1.0/31 I iOI.D 7703 10/07 CC 11nmarks' - - ------- - ---- --- --- --- - - REINFORCEMENT PER PLANS Infomnation contained herein is not to be reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this office. INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department 1312S 811 Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Roc-O-Phone)s 639-X41775 Business Phones 639-4171 Inapection: �ootiiy� P:bg. Underelab Hoch. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk yFound. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAI.s Post/Beam Struct. San. Sower Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Hoch. Rain D.eain Instlation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Water Llne Gyp. Rd. -H,,oceeh. Date Rmpesteds CG I�;f Z TL., Address: AL((�I/1t� e , /�Ci< Permit f:,d z- Builder: TRE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIREDs �2 ocz 9.c Inspector: -- -.--_--_-` Dates1Y __&i/PPRO'!ED W DISAPPROVED - APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE _- -Call For Reinnp. Construction inspection 6 Related Tests Carlson Testing Inc. Geotechnical Consulting AEPORTOF6X1.2 CONCRETE TFQTSPECIMEN� P.O. Box_ ASTM C172/C12.31/C31/C39/C143 Tigard,Oregon 97281 rest Methods: Phone(501)684-3460 — — - -.— FAX N 684-0954 0'x/29 94 94-1177 )ate Melded: _-- —_ , 19----- Job No. Permit No: _----__...-_.--_-- MORRISON BUILDING CO BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Itoject: --— — ------ ---- -- —.-- -— 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE — >ddres,.: -- --- - --------- --- ----- ,ontractor: - ---- —-.--- -Sub Contractor: — -------- VAN DOREN CONCRETE Truck No. 45 —Ticket No. _ 49818 nr c eta Supplier: -------- — ---- S . LEACH -Cu.Yds. — .S Load No.1. -- Ast By: - RAINY 70 53 Neather. —_ _ — -__-- - —._Temp.High: .__-_ _--_..Temp.Low: _ FOOTINGS ON 5 LINE ( A TO G ) AND STATRS @ G R 1 -acation of Placement: -- _ Time: _— _-_---_Concrete Temp: - ---- 28 .. I ',tn,ngth Requirement: _. - —PSI ® ---days Slump ---- Cement Tyge - — 3000 3/4 " Uix No./No.SacLs -- -- ___Air Content - -- Max.Aggregate -- -- Admix.Amount: — Bi3nd: - —_ Admix.Amount: Set --- Set 'fest® Register Date Date Total Area Unit Report Tested No. Dans Number F;sc'd Test Load - PSI No. By A- 7 7558 09/3(: 1.0/06 78,508 28.32 2770 1 JB 28 7558 09/30 10/2'7 28 7558 09/30 1012.7 11oLD 7558 09/30 c.c inrnrm nAm r nnfti1rwrt hornin it:not to he renroducad.except in full.without prior authorization from this office. T Construction Insp Pion &Related Tests Carlson Testing, '].C■ Geotechnical Consulting REPCRT OF6X 12 CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS P.O. Box 23914 ASTM C172/C1231/C31/C39/C143 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Test Methods: _ _�_ Phone(503)684-3460 09/29 94 94-1177 FAX M 684-0954 Date Molded: - , 1e Job No. -- Permit No: -—----_---- ----- ---- MORRISON BUILDING CO Client: -- --- — -- --..---- BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING Froject: _-- —� — — -- — 10380 SW CASCADE AVENUE _ Address: — — --- -- Contractor: ------ ---- — Sub Contractor: --.--.- — -- -------- VAN DOREN CONCRETE 49818 Concrete Supplier: _— --_—Truck No. --___. _Ticket No. ---- LEACH Cast By: Cu.Yds. — Load No. -- RAINY 70 5 j Weather: — —Temp.High: Temp.Low: FOOTINGS ON 5 '.INE ( A TC) G ) AND STAIRS 0 G & 1 Location of Placement: -- �- TeetTime: ----_----Concrete Temp: 28 2 1 Strength Requirement: ___ _ PBI O .--..days Slump - Cement Type - 3000 3�n „ IMix NOW.Sacks Alr Content Max.Aggregate --- Adrnix.Amount: Brand: Admix.Amount ------ - -_-_--Brand: Set lest® Register ( Date Date Total I Unit Report Tested No. Days Number Recrea d Test Load PSI No. By 7 7558 09X30 1.0/06 78,508 28.P 2770 1 JB 28 7558 09/30 10/27 116,870 ?.8„25 4130 3 JB -- - 28 7558 09/30 10127 115,940 28.29 4100 3 JB HOLD 28 7558 09/30 10/27 118,120 28.29 4180 3 JB cc: P.masks: Information c"Ined herein Is riot to he reproduced,except In full,without prior authorization from this offico. i INSPECTION NOTICR ci_y of Tigard Building Department 13125 SM Ball sled. Tigard, Oregon 97233 Inspectl.on Line (Rec-O-Phone)s 639-47711�7--5 Business Phone: 639-1171 Inspections_ Footing Plbg. Underelab Mech. Rough-.in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbq. Top Out Gas Line FINALS Pust/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Mach. Rain Drain Insulation -Plume. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line / Gyp. Sd. -Koch. Date Requestuds_ I 2 9( �j� T. mes _AM ry Address: f �O�� Q� �/` Permit #: Builder:�_�' THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUI:usO: T 9 Inspector: Date: APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT IN3 ABOVE _C311 For Reinnp Construction Inspection&Related Test Carlson. TestiEn einc. 94-1177 P.O.Box 23814 JOB NO. Sep 28 . 1994 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Phone(503)684-3460 REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS FAX#684-0954 MORRISON BUILDING CO Client —_—��_ —— — -- -- --- -- -- BEAVEftTOh HONDA BUILDING Proiect . --- — -- — — -- — - Soil Description .-__I I _gip Max.Dry Oensity 1 ;1 _2 —lbs./cu.it Optimum Moisture ?R?> ^ % Method of Test T- I ja,) --- _ Serial s —_ DATE(!F TEST ---- _ _—_ ELEV. UFT mw IN-Puce DENSITY % - TEST LOCATION MOZY �ICU•_TL TEST N0. FT. NO. r W - DRY COMPACTION SF 09-22 L �t�hlr_ ATION PAD, FAST SI )F - SF 09-27 —2 UND.AIIObLPIILL. W.F_:iL-:,..L.DE-.__ 01 GRID LINE 5 '0" FOOTING LINE OVEREXCAVATED . INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED FOR RE-- INFORCED FOR REINFORCEMENT CONCRETE , ETC . FOOTING GRADE AT ORIGINAL GRADE . — Tested by -- #aliJ,�h4M — CARLSON TES TING INC Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. C I T Y UN 1 1SAR1) -- RE.(.;1-IPP OV PAVMEN I Rl"-('P �i I I sat 1. 94—.20534"0. C.HE:1:.14 (.4M,II.)N 1 r 1.5/. o.'I.:. IVtM1l�: a F:IF.AVF'F2T0N HON1,O LASH HM(.}UN 1 0. 00 ADDRESS* 1�W f:NNYUN f(C)AD POYMEN1 UH4 a bit.! 14P:4^i F'iFAVER70N, OR SUDDIVI!iION � 970015— PURPOSE. OF VlA Y MfJJ7 AMALIN 1 I'(.I 7 t PI.111PU ISF (IF PAYME�N l' AMC.11_IN7 P(41 D BU11,.U1N[7 AF'RM i 1 1'94 G.(71PP 9c.'. `5W 11i to PER 4. E :� PLAN CHF-.(',R F F. 60. 1.3 10380 14W Msacouc BL.VD FU1(Il.. AMUUPll F11411> ...�.._. — -- ilww.. 1 i 'CITY OF TIGARDBUILD114G HERMIPERMIT011 _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE ISSUED: 06/08/94 13:25 SY(Hall Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 97223.8199 (691)/VAA '7 1 PARCEL: 15135BA-02800 SITL: iIUDRE:SS. . . : 10.380 :3W �.A5U.ADE BLVD SU8DIVISIOII. . . . : ZONING: I-P BL00... . . . . . . . . . . LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REISSUE: FLOOR AREAS----------- E:XTLRIOR WALL CONSfFtUCIIUN-- CLASS OF WORK. :ADD FIRST. . . . :5774 sf N: S:4HR E: Wt4HR TYPE OF USE. . . :kr:OM SECOND. . . :5774 sf PROTLCT OPENINGS?--_.._._______ TYRr: OF CCINST. '3N THIRU. . . . : sf N: Ci:Y E: W:Y ut,LIJPANCY GRP. :BE TOTAL-----.- 11546 sf ROOF CCNST:R f=I PF RET? :Y OCCUPANCY LOAD:231 BASEM' NT. : sf AREA SEP. RAiFD: S TOR. :2 HT. :30 ft GAROGE. . . . sf OCCU SEP. RATED: BSMT 7:N MEZ Z? :N REOD SETBACKS-------- FLOOR LOAD. . . . :75 p f LEF T : ft RGHT t ft t- I R SPKL:Y SMOK DET. . :N DWELLING UNITS: FRNT: ft REAR-0 ft FIR AL_RM:N HNDICP AC.'C::Y SEDRMS: BATHS: IMF SURFACE:00 PQO LORR:N PARI;71141:3: VALUE. $ : 541000 Remarks : Beaverton Honda- constrf.tr_t a two-story addition to the existing buildin p• NO CERTIFICATE OF UCC UNTIL ALL CONDITIONS OF SDR94-111005 ARE SATISFIED. O;rtie*` : _-.-_ __.____,_.____ _____._______ ___ ____________ ._____-_ FEES LANWHE RE ENTERPRISES, INC. type amoL{nt by d«te racpt 12505 SW BROADWAY TIF f 13068. 00 JU 06/08/94 PRMT $ 1533. 00 JG 06/08/94 - DEr VERTON OR 97005 PI-CK f 91)6. 45 - 04/14/94 94-251276 Phone ;t: 643- 5577 -JPCT $ 76. 65 J3 06/08/94 Contractnr: __.._ .. _...._._..._ _.. `'1'l01'PiSvh � �dy Phone tot $ 15674. 10 TOTAL Reg #. . . REDU.IRED INSPEG'TIONS This oerait is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Foot/Fol..tnd Insp Tigard Municipal Code. State cf Ore. Specialty Codes and ali other Struc Steel Insp applicable laws. All were will be done in ;iccordance with R e i n f Steel Insp approved plans, This perut till expire if work is not started S1 ab Insp withir 18? days of issuance, or if work is suspended for sore Masonry Insp theer 186 days. I-raminU Insp ins'..tlation Insp _ __.__•,_ Shear Wall Insp Uyp Berard Insp Permittee Sipn,�t . : r _ Sui-p Cei 'ing Insp �C � Final Inspection 1.syUed Bv : Call for inspection - 639-4175 CITY OF TIGARD -- WCEIPT OF PAYMENT RECEIPT NO. s94-253P76 CHECK AMOUNT 1918. 40 NAME- i BEAVERTON HONDA CASH AMOUNT z 0. 00 ADDREES PAYMENT DATE 06/08/94 SUBDIVISION PURPOSE GV PAYMENT AMOUNT PA I D PURPf,H?R OF PAYMENT' AM(JUN T PA I D BUILDIN6 PERM 153 i. 00 ST. BUILIJ PER 76. lbb PLAN rHFCJ( F-F 308. 75 110380 SW CASCADE SLVD 1 I -101AL AMOUNT P(AJP 1918. 40 CITE' OF T I CARD51 TE WORK �' PE RMI T COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PERMIT 11. . . . . . .. 5I T94—kti0�k� 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Orogon 972239819P (Cp3kpO-4171 L)VqTL ISSUED: 06/08/94 PARCEL: 15.135BA-02800 SITE ADDRESS. . . : 10380 SW C(;SCAV;E BLVD SUBDIVISION. . . . : BLOCK. . . . . . . . . . : LOT'. . . . . . . . . . . . . TYPE OF WORK:ADD PAViNU... . . . . . . . . :Y RESO. NO.. : EXCV VOLUME . :bbl cy, GRADINS?. . . . . . . . ..Y VAl.'JE. . . FILL VOLUME. : cy LONDSCAPING?. . . . .-Y LNU FILL?. . . . . . :N SITE PREP?. . . . . . :Y SOILS RPT REQD?;N STORM DRAINS". . . ,,Y IMPERV SUPFACF. . :00 5f Rcmar-14s , Be,--av,ertor Honda--- constroict a two --Story addition to the existinq bUild1r) Owner. YFLS ----LANPHERE LNTERPRISES, INC. type amotint bdate recpt ILbOb SW BROADWAY PRMT $ 9E. 50 JU 06/08/94 17 4. 63 iG 06/08/94 BEAVERTON OR 971105 60., 17, JG 06/08/9'1 Phone It' . 643-5577 Coy- tractor: CIJI\i"'PACTOR NOT ON FILE Phon? #: f 157. 26 'iurAL Reg RFQUIRED INSPECTIONS This pri-sit is issued subject to the reguletions contained is the Eros.on Control Tigard Muni,";z! Hcdzz, State of are. Specialty Codet, and all other EmcavAtioii Insp applicabli laws. All work will he done in accordance with Fill Inspection approved plans. This permit will expire if work is not started Grading I n s p within 13P days of issuance, or if work is suspended for more Stryly Drain lilsip than 180 days. Final Inspection Permittee Siqnat1A?-P Call for inspection 639-41'b 06-'08/94 11:41 W503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD I0002;00: TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE Installment Payment Application and Disclosure Statement In the Matter of the Traffic Impact Fee for Beaverton Honda Tax Map J_ IS135BA� Lot Number(s) 2800 Building Permit # 8UP94-0112 Site Address 10380 SW Cascade Blvd. Subdivision Case File #�SDR94-0005 1 IF Land Use Distncrt I-P To Be ©filled To: Beaoerton Honda __ _ Address: 10380 SW Ca,cdde BlvnyTlgard—OR 97223 _ Phone#. 684 6600 To the City of Tigard: In accordance with the provision of Oregon Revised Statute 223,208 ;and Washington County Ordinance No. 379 which relates to the imposition of traffic impact fee for the financing of rnaior-collector roads and arterials of Washington County, I/we HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION AND AGREE, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, to pay my/our traffic impact fee, .s has been determined by Washington County Ordinance No. 375 in 20 semi-annual installments cr the amount financed together with one-half of one year's imerest thereon at a rate of 8,98% annual percentage rate or, the unpaid amount owed. The lien date is the first day of the month following the date the application it igned, The first payment is due six months- thereafter and at six (6) month intervals thereafter for a period of__10 years. Each instailment payment wili Include principal and interest. If hwe neglect or refuse to pay an, part of the installments provided herein, includ;ng Interest, within one (1) year after the sama shall have become due and payable, then the whole amount of the unpaid assessment shall become dile and payable at once and shall be collected in the manner provided by law including foreclosure on the above-des;:ribed real property. The traffic mpact fees, annual pE.mentage rano of interest !8,98 %) and finenr;e charges which 'we agree to pay are 3s fo;lows HIGIIVIIAY TRANSIT 1) Amount of Traffic Impact Fee $__10,175.00 2.893.00 2) Amount Financed . . . . . . . $ 10,179-00 _2,89LQ0 _ 3) Equal Semi-Annual Principal Payments $._ 508.76 144,65 4) Interest on Balance at Rate of . . . , , , , , , 8.S8 I\We understand that the amount owed, as stated above, shall be a lien on the above-described subject property pursuant to Washinyton County Ordinance No. 379 Section 6 (D) and ORS 223,230. DATED this 8th d ) e 1994, ,A -I , _,�_____ __ Siynat re o Pm & 0 ner(s)l -- Sigr,eture of Property Owner(s) STATE OF OREGON ) Namp (Please Print): Address: a �, „� l`c Q s IL 2�Cle V I County of Washington j SUB 7CRI13ED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this ` `Y day of St \ f 1� o No ry public for Uregcn «g, JNS) My GOMMISSION FY.1,114E3 VEO.16.i'VV �ommlsslon Expires: —1�, �®rte ARCHITECTURE INTMORS FL4NNW'G RECEIVED May 25, 1994 MAY 2 61994 Mr. David Scott C""NITY OFVEIMMENT Plans Examiner Building Department City of Tigard 1312 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Beaverton Honda/Yamaha Plan Check No. #4 - 29C Dear David: Enclosed are letters from the building owner, Beaverton f Londa/Yamaha, and the structural engineer, T.M. Rippey consulting engineers, dated May 25, 1994. Per our discussions, the live load, on the second and future third floors, will be limited to a maximum of 75 p.s.f. Please indicate your ac--eptance by signing, in the space provided below and returning a copy of the signed cover letter for our files. If I can be of further assistance, please call. Sincerely, ..RA r�' -reC liam S. Bailey A. . Project Archite t Associate r 1,zX� Ac epted by Dat c.c. Bob Lamphere T.M. Rippey Steve Morrison PRINCIPALS GFORGE C.SHELDON,AIA DONALD D F.GGLFSTON,AIA,CSI SEM ARCHITECTS PC 123 NW SECOND AVENUE PORTLAND,OREGON 97209 PHONL:503.229.6444 FAX -01-228-690 9221 S.W.Barbur Bivd.,Suite 105 TM RIPPFY Portland,Oregon 97219 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Phone.(303)244-0266 Fax(503)244-0191 May 24, 1994 City of Tigard Building Department Attention: David Scott, Plans Examiner 1312 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 2.3397 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Beaverton Honda Project Number 94024 Plan Check #4-29C Dear David: The loading of 75 psf live load for the project noted above reflects our understanding of how the structure is to be utilized. Based on our conversations with Bill Bailey of SERA Architects and the owner, it is our understanding that the second (and future third) floor(s) are to become retail showrootas in the future. At present thl, second floor is to be used to stock inventory and to have minor, escorted, customer access. No stacking of stock, exceeding 75 psf should occur in the space. it is our understanding that the floor will be equipped with signage, conspicuously placed stating "f=loor loading is not to exceed 75 psf." If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, 1e720 Ralph Turnbaugh, P.E. T.M. Rippey Consulting Engineers OR , � � cc Bob Stalp, Beaverton Honda �o�g4 Bill Bailey, SERA Architects � '°H 1URNeavv RNT/is L _ _ 1 BEAVERTON HONDA / YAMAHA MOTORCYCLE & POWER EOtAPMENT ., 10180 SW Cascade Blvd Tigard.OR 07223 503J684•E800 i May 24 , 1994 David Scott Plans Examiner City of Tigard Building Department 1312 SW Hall Blvd P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Beaverton Honda/Yadnaha Plan Check 04-29C Dear Davi.d: The loading of 75PSF live load for the project noted above reflects our understanding of how the structure is to be utilized. The second (and future third) fl.00T ( 4) are to become showroom in the future. At present the second flooz is to be used to stock. inventory and to have minor escorted customer access . Na stacking of stock., exceeding 75PSF, will occur i_n the space. The floor will be equi_pp�.d with signage, conspicuously spaced, stating "FLOOR LOADING ;f5 NOT :PO BXCEED 75PSF. " If you have any quest.ions, please call. Sincerely, ' r i {1 n Robert 0. Lar.phere President I i i i i I Motu ARCHrTECTUPJ LNTERIORS PLANNING May 12, 1994 Mr. Mark Burrows Plans Examiner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Project: Beaverton Honda - Plan Check #4-29C 10380 SW Cascade Blvd. Subject: Response to Building Plan Review (1991 UBC with Oregon Amendments) Dear Mr. Purrows: Enclosed are the responses to the questions raised in the building plan review. SERA Architects revised drawings for sheets Al, A2, A3 and A5. TM Rippey Consulting Engineers issued revisions on the enclosed 8-1/2"x11" pages. The following answers are in response to your May 2nd letter. 1. The existing building is type III N. The new addition is also type III N construction so there is no need for separation walls. (See dwg. I/A 1.) 2. Submission of mechanical and electrical plans will be provided upon selection of the sub-contractor. 3. Enclosed is the form for Oregon energy compliance. The roof insulation will be a minimum of 1-1/6" rigid insulation to provide an R- value of 4.17. The exterior walls will be insulated with a combination of R-I 1 and R-9 batt insulation. 4. See enclosed manufacturer's installation instruction for rigid roof insulation. 5. See revised site plan. (See dwg. 1/AI.) 6. See general note #2 on sheet A 1. 7. A drinking fountain was added to the second floor. (See dwg. 3/A1.) 8. There are two accessible toilet rooms in the existing facility. (See dwg. 1/A1.) PMNCIPALS GEORGE C.SHELDON,AIA DONALD D EGGLESTON,AIA,CSI $IIIA ARCHMMS PC 128,4W SECOND AVENUE PORTLAND,OREGON 97209 PHONE:503.228.614/ FAX 503.228.6911 r 9. See dwg. 1/A 1 for location of existing exits for the ground floor. 10. Dimension added to dwg. 5/A5 indicating distance from wall. 11. Detail reference should have read 2/A5 similar. 12. See general note #1 on sheet Al and locations of signs on dwg. 2/Al and 3/Al. 13. See skylight manufacturer information included with Oregon energy compliance form. 14. See dwg. 1/A2 for tempered glazing locations. 15. This project is a design-build project with Morrison Construction. eneral notes and drawings are used in lieu of specification. 16. A facsimile of the completed structural special inspection form is enclosed. 17. See general note #1 on sheet A2. 18. A letter from Beaverton Honda explaining their intended use of the second floor has been mailed directly to you. Site Review Concerns: 1. Enclosed is information concerning the sediment fencing that will be incorporated into the project. 2. The amount of footing cut and fill will be less than 50 yards. The excess till from footing excavation will be retained on site. Structural Concerns: i1g structural concerns were addr ssed b TM Rippey Consulting Engineers. m J5, 41 A W 'I, c4 �CQc. 1. Temporary construction shoring is by contractor. n 2.. Wej-it report #1821. �\ahs -- � 3. ew 2-1/2 x 13.5 purlins are supd a� e existing beam and wall Gv1 dger by Simpson hangers per d tail 4/S4 13154. mC� 101115 W JAS INV 4. Roof level is to be used as possible future 3rd floor with L-L=75psO SL=25psf. Roof load does not govern design. 5. See structural special inspection form. 6. Anchor-it TCBO #4398. _)7. Out of plane anchorage for existing roof is Simpson PA23 strap at each purlin per existing building rawings. --�� Se a a e revised detail 3 S4. 9. See included geotechnical rep rt by Carlson Testing, Inc. --10. Rawl-Stud ICBG #4514.. I�' Future 3rd floor design . =75 similar to 2nd floor. �12. See attached r:vised calculation s eet W5/5. ✓ sea- ^�O-- S��� See attached suPe \al calculate n sheets F6a and Fhb and partial foundation plan. �7"' ��� ? Desi n floor, LL=75 sf y� g p C Under this permit the roof will not be used for any special roof loading. 0" 16. Verco deck ICBO #2078. < KDesign floor LL=75psf. `1`"r' ' ?' Please contact me at 228-6444 if you have any futher questions. Sincerely, SERA Architects, P.C. 6_Ca'_J- 0a William S. r4iley, A.I.A. Project Architect enclosures c.c. Steve Morrison, Morrison Building Corp. =00b BEAVEFlTON FEOrJDA SERA S W CANYON BEAV BEAVERTUN,i BEGUNN 97 97005CUT yy 503,643-5577 YIhY 1 :► 199 May 12, 1994 SERA Architects 123 N.W. 2nd Avenue Portland, Oregon 97209 Gentlemen: This is to clarify our proposed use for the new building at our facility at 10380 S.W. Cascade Boulevard. We plan to use the ground floor for a showroom and the second floor will be used as a warehouse for the various types of equipment we sell at that location. We do not plan to have any offices on the second floor. Our plans are to use the third floor for a warehouse when we need the additional storage spac ! sometime in the future. Yours very truly, Robert. A. Stalp RAS:rs P4;r 12 '94 31 Q p i •� Pla Review a Q/UT r 'o Dal CITY OF TIGARD i OREGON Structural Special Inspectlons The caner or architect or engineer of record shall complete Farts B & D of this form and then return it to the Building Division for proval prior to issuance of a building permit. (Please note that a separate soils special inspection form may be requires and dditiona) special Inspections may be required for contractor design Items,) Feaver Lon HoAa Pr ect Address: 10380 SW Cascade Blvd, IjAard1 OR Pro1eti Name:_ Motorcycle Arid I t. Ar itect of Record (Firm): SERA Architects Phone No: 228_6444 _ En ineer of Recora (firm): Phone No: 24v -0266 TM RiIZ � Co.tl� ay.t3 The (lowing special inspections and structural observations shall be performed according to the State Building Code and the City f Tigard's Munlcipal _;ode Chapter 14.06.010- 14.06.040 unless n schedule of inspections is submitted by the Engineer cf R cord and approved by th, Building Division. A Reinforced Concrete [7 Prestressed Concreta Structural Steel ❑ Strrctural Masonrv, fm )Welding ❑ F=ireproofing ❑ Other �3. Indic Ale the special inspector or approved testing agency !o perform the special inspections noted in Fan A above, inciuding acidw ses and phone numbers, Submit namos, qualifications and certi(ca.lons of the speclai inspectors assigned to the project. The special inspector or inspection agency shall submit a final signed report to the Building Division stating that all items requiring special inspection and testing were NIfilled aid reported and,to the best of his/her nowlodge, In conformance with the approved design drawings, specifications, anr)rovcd change orders and the piieable workmanship provisions of the U.B.C.(see U.B.C. 7015 for soils speclai inspe^tion final report requirements). tams not.ln oe, unresolved Items or any discrepancies In Irtspection coverage (I.e., missed inspections, eiiodic Insp when continuous wos required, etc.) shall be spo6fically itemized in this report. Carl -)n Texting, Inc. , P.O. Box 21814, Tigard, OR (503) 634-3460 C. Structural Site Observation by Engineer of Record O a ownor hereby agrees to emplov the special Inspector, opproved tosting agency and/or engineer for the rove-noted pe ' paction /a d/o t r ob ation. ' gn urn of Owner -17 /V -.S Tint amr R n Phone No.� --- FirmFlFaverl en-- `� ` '], t1�1�c±. Dale_—L`lay1 2, 1.4_--- ;;our, ral Plans Examiner signature -_ �- ,,,,,,�X 13125 W Holl BNd., Tiq jrd, OR 97223 (5U3) 639-4171 TDD (503) 634.2772 — — --- — ----- -- , r Form 2a SUMMARY Project 1. Project Name Beaverton Honda / Yamahn Addition 2. Project Address 10380 5.W. Ga5cade Blvd. 3. City/Town Ticlard, Or 9"1223 4. Building Area 104"11 -2 floors - Addition Attached ':hapter Type I.D. Description Attached Forms and Workshoets Build!ng Envelope Form 3a Preaceptive Pn!h ❑ 3b Component Performance Path Check M,ee M "� nMkefe Mie off-W r-+� �WM Workshee! 3a Wall U-values {1� eaAcheef. 3b Roof U-values 3c Floor U-values ❑ 3d Average Thernfal Values Iiri✓ Systems Form 4a System ❑ Worksheet 4e Unitary Air Conditioner--Air Cooled ❑ 4b Unitary Air Conditioner--Water Cooled ❑ 1, 4c Unitary Hea;Pump-.Air Cooled ❑ Oil M r�( 4d Unitary Heat Pump--Water Cooled ❑ 4e Unitary AC&Heat Pump--Evaporatively Cooled ❑ U e740Nil 41 Packcaed Terminal AC--Air Cooled ❑ 4g Packaged Terminal Heat Pump--Air Cooled ❑ 4h Water Chilling Packages--Water&Air Cooled ❑ 4i Boilers--Gas-Fired and Oil Fired ❑ 4J Furnaces&Unit Heaters--Ga,,Fired and Oil Fired ❑ AfPficial Light Form 5a Inlet Lighting ❑ 5b Lighting Sched,ae ❑ ppY h14- Sc Interior Lighhrg Power ❑ 5d Exterior Light ng ❑ Worksheet 5a Interior Control Crediis ❑ Applicant 5. Name William 5, Balley, AIA E ETeltel�hone �20-64446. Com an aeon chitect5, p.c. Ma 9, 1994 7. Si nature Other No. of Pages _ Description of Document Documents I Owcne :c line Manl,lracturers In or-mation � z BrlstOlite ManUfactUrers Information FMW NN X prnrmp rnk:WNMnk fetl �� —•^ -•�• �nwf�rtn!f,'n7nkx/ I u Forms 2-1 r ' Form 3b COMPONENT PERFORMANCE PATI Heated Building F_ ',=f/Ceil bove Grade Walls-Code Maximum Uo from Table 3g. Enter here and in cell 3(c)and 4(c) 0.3 a Enter the average U Above Grade -Code Maximum Uo from table 3g. Enter here and In cell 5(e) 0.011 values from (a) (b) (e) (d) (a) (f) Karnsheer 3d into Building Area or Code Max. Actual Target UA Actual UA CONS 3(d),t(d)and 5(d) Component Length U or F Ua or Fb,c (b)x(c) 1 (b)x(d) b For a slab with the 3. Windows and Glazed DoorE 2254 1`12 0.3 0.-711 6116 1-781 mine 3g),nen lever 4. Above-Grade Opaque Walls&Doors -7558 ft2 0.3 0.12 226-7 90-1 (Table 3g),enter 0.59 Walls_ _ rift cell 5, Roofs and Skylights 536:� ft2 0.01 0.131 483 '703.2 Nlae Ofhe e enter 1 34 e � c'-ar en heated 6. Floors over Unheated Spaces ft2 0.08 slab:rth fife men 7. Unheated Slab on Grade Floor 5368 ft 0.58 0.58 3113 3113 tribulation novel,enter 0 90 into tell ofd) 8. Heated Slab on Grade Floor ft 09 Othdrwise.enter 2 73 9. Target and Actual UA.Total columns(e)and f) 6540 4504 10. Enter"Y"if the Actual UA of cell 9(f)is less than Target UA of cell 9(e). Otherwise,redesign. Y Cooled Building 11. Summer Design lemperature from Table 3g. OF 85 12. Delta T. Subtract 75 deqrees from line 11. Enter here and in cell 15(d) 10 d Enter the average 13. Solar Factor from Table 3g. Enter here and in cell 18(d) M 133.2 U•value of the windows,wens,and 14. Above Grade Walls--Code Maxin um OTTV from Table 3g 35 ur.,a froma C O �.Vorkanoer 3d Building Area Actual (b)x(c)x e Enter the average Component (sf) U-value Delta T TDeq (d)or(e)j TDep from worksheet 3d 15. Windows and Glazed Doors 2,254 019 10 11,801 fEntertheaverego 16. Above-Grade Opaque Walls&Doors -1,558 0.11 _ 30.10 25,025 sc-vahreofthe windows from 17.17 Roofs and Skylights 9,812 _ workshaef Id a) C I Building Area Actual Solar Component (sf) SC-value Factor (b)x(c)x(d) ' 18. Windows and Glazed Doors :2,254 all 133 2-13,2 i2 19. Grand Total. Add cells 15(f) 16(f)and 18(f) 316,043 20. Actual OTTV. Divide line 19 by cell 17(b) _ 32.2098 21. Enter"Y"if the Actual OTTV(line 20)is less than required OTTV(line 14). Otherwise,redesign. Y Envelope 22 The perimeter insulation for the slab-on-Trade floor shall extend downward from7`1180 1�A9 (Typ) the top of the slab for a minimum distance of 24 inches_:oe Section 530(d). dEnter the 23 Below-grade walls shall be insulated with a minimum of RA insulr.cwfi extending Not Applicable rBference to plans the full height of the wall to the top of the lowest hoot ,et be(--nrade, and spen,/ications that shows whichever is less. compliance win the 24. Manufactured doors and windows are certified according to ASTM E 283 for baneral Note, requirements 0.37 cfm per foot of window sash crack and 11 cfm per foot of door crack. !Sheet Al 25 On the warm side(winter)of the insulation for the walls,roof and floor,install a Sheet A9 vapor barrier with a perm rating of one or less. See Section 5303 (IN71 Fom1s 3-3 Form 3d AVERAGE THERMAL VALUES Windows la) (b) (c) (d) (e) (t► and Window and Glazed Door Area UA Shading SCA Glazed Description _ (sf) U-;dlue (b)x(c) Coefficient (b)x(e) Doors Double glass, 1/4 in. air space 2254 0.7q 1'181 0.91 2051.1 1. Total Columns 2254 1781 2051.1 2 Average U-value. Divide cell 1 (d)by cell 1(b). Enter here and on Form 3b,cells 3(d)and 15(c). 0.71 3. Average SC value. Divide cell 1(q by cell I(b). Enter here and on Form 3b,cell 1e(c) 0.q1 Opaque (a) (b) (c) (d) (1) (g) Walls and Wall and Door Area UA UA TDeq Doors Description (sf) U-value (b)x(c) TDe • (d)x(f) Furred Cl,,-1U - 5olid Grout 4,440 0.119 528 23 12,152 •See Table Furred CMU - Open Cell 81q 0.116 q5 3-1 31515 below Furred CMU - Interior - Open Cell 603 0.109 66 37 2,432 Frame Wall 1,686 0.112 1q0 44 8,358 4 Total Columns 7,558 5,701 26,457 5 Average U-value Divide ceV 4(d)by cell 4(b). Enter here and on Form 3b,:ells 4(d)and 16(c). 0.12 6. Average TDeq. nwide cell 4(g)by cell 4(d). Enter here and on Form 3b,line 16(d). 30.10 TDeq Wall Construction--Mass Per Unit Area TDeq (lbslsf) OF 0 to 25 44 26 to 40 37 41 to 70 30 71 and above _ 23 ,, Worksheets 3-17 Form 3d(cunt'd) AVERAGE THERMAL VALUES Roofs and (a) (b) (c► (d) Skylights Root and Skylight Area UA Iacri tion y (st) U-value (b)x(c) 3--ply w/r-ap over adlIerilln rl Id insul 5,1-16 0.11-1 605.6 Skylights - Brlstolite Dbl. Domed, scxyllc, 1412 0.5 d16 7. Total Columns 5,365 101.6 8. Average U-value. Divide cell 7(d)by cell 7(b).Enter here and on Form?,b, 0.131 cell 5{d). Floor over (a) (b) (c) (d) Unheated Floor over Unheated Spare Area UA Space Description M U-value (b)x(c) 9. Total Columns -017 1770 i 10. Average -value. Olvide cell 9(d)by 9(b). Enter here and on Form 3b,cell 6(d). (tial Chepter 3-Building Envelope Worksheets 3-18 Worksheet 3a WALL UNALUES Ack on - (a) (b) (c) (d) Block Wall Layer Description Detail R-value See Table 3c for R- -_ Exterior Moving Values of air Surface Air 0'17 spaces. — — --!_ See Table 3b for -- A \Brie R--Values;of brick, 41 block and gypsum • B Spac wallboard. — ------ ___ D r- Concrete h"- 0"F)L")See Table 3a for Block (e K 1241w ' i, R-Values o/ Insulation w R II framing/insulation, __ D Framing/ Zv4-ttilti iC � — — E - Gypsum Wallboard �t3 \ Interior Still n 0.68 Surface Air 1. Total column(d) 8 2. U-value. Invert the amount in line 1 Insulated _ - (a) - (b) —j—(c) (d) Concrete Layer Description I Detail R value Exterior Moving 0.17 See Table 3b for Surface Air R-Values of stucco, ::' :.`•':: r.`'::' Concrete or - -- concrr'e,insulation :::v.: ;:': -rte?.' -- _ --____ A Stucro and gy)sum - - — -- wallbotrd. ;. :y•-.•, ,. . --- - - � Rigid B Insulation See Table 3a for ---- - H-Value.;of C Concrete framing/Insulation. _ _- - --- - J D Framing/ Insulation Gypsum Wallboard Interior Still . .. ..... .. .. .. .....•. 0.68 Surface Air 1. Total column(d) 2. U-value. Invert the amount in line 1 �, Worksheets 3-11 Worksheet. 3a WALL U VALUES irick on F (14 Block Wall � Layer Description Detail R-value - - - See Table 3c for R- Exterior DrMl L Values of air Surface _ spaces. A Brick See Table 3b for R-Values of brick, Air block and gypsum • - - _ - B wallboard. - -Space ----- - C Concrete t 1 See Table 3a for Etlock R-Values of \IX "— —_ framing/insulation. — - Framing/ 5,5 - insulationMl� E Wallboard --a Interior Still "r��t�s`-.`l- n.88 c Surface _Air_ _ 1. Total column(d) 1--- ,►z 2. U.-value. Invert the amount in line 1 '/0-j Insulated ---- (a) �— (b) (C) (d) ConcreteLayer Description Detail H-value Vali •. ,.....: :::••:.::..:.::.. ...:...:... -- .;.; -- — -- Exterior Moving `F, "r.- 0.17 See Table 3b for Surface Air _ R-Values of stucco, Concrete or concrete,insulation ;::' ''. ^' ,� -- - A Stucco and gypsum -- --- wallboard. " ' -._... Rigid- -- Insulation See Table 3a for R-Values of .:::,F• y :; -___-_ __ C Concrete framing/insulation Insulation -- E Gypsum Wallboard Interior Still 0.68 --- --- Surface Air 1. Total column(d) �i 2. U-value. Invert the amount in line 1 „�,;, Worksheets 3-11 Worksheet 3a WALL UNALUES \Irick on (a�_ (bj - (c) ^_(d) Block Wall Layer Description Detail R-value See Table 3c for R- \ Exterior Moving _ 0.17 Values of air \ - Surface Air spaces. A Brick/ See Table 3b for ----- R-Values of brick, block and gypsum • x B „pace wallboard. Concrete 15%1LAG See Table 3a for \ C Block R--Values of \� Framing/ 1�f4 vJ/ / framing,/insulation. • _ D h 1 J Insulation _►y�L- E Gypsum Wallboard � ' __ Intern Still 0.68 Surface Air \\\ 1. Total column(d) b 14 2. U-value. Invert the amount in line 1 1 `� —J Insulated (cl (d)�— Concrete Layer Description Dotal!— R value - - ---- ;;; ;::.;:':;::'.;:r'.::.'•.': Exterior Moving 01% See Table 3b for ' �• `�`�` '' Surface Air R-Values of stucco, ::, :;'.;•':'.:•':'::•. _- A Concrete or amcrete,insulation ,'.`+•,. =�'•.' - - Stucco---------- aid gypsum RIr1d wallboard. Insulation See Table 3a for -- -� R-Values('f .'rs-J,: ;f y' C Concrete framing insulation. - -" Framing/ • -- Insulation -- -- E Gypsum ---- — Wallboard Interior Still 0.68 Surface Air _E 1. Total column(d) 2. U-value. Invert the amount in line 1 -- I ) Worksheets 3-11 (1193) Worksheet 3a (cont'd) WALL UNALUES aluminum (a) (b) (C) ld) Siding on layer Description Detail TR-value Stud Wall -- — -- -- — Exterior Moving 0.17 See Table,3c for - --- ---- -- --- -- - -- MovingSurface Air R-Values of airA Aluminum NT-(, I spaces. ---- Siding sipIN", ------- -- - See Table 3b for Air ,l q R-Values of -- - ----- Space 14 ' aluminum siding, — ---` plywood sheathing _-- _ —______ C Sheathing and gypsum -- wallboard. •— - ---_-- --- D Framing/ 4"M W M1., See Table 3a for Insulation R-Values of -41 E Gypsum framing/ _- Wallboard �-, insulation. Interior Still - -- - - — -._ Surface-�- Air 0.68 1. Total column(d) 2. U-value. Invert the amount in line mor Generic Wall (b) - (c) (d--�—� / )a,,Tab/ k for R- Layer Description DetailR-value lues of exterior Exterior and interior ---- -- - -- - Surface surfaces. See Table 3b for - --- A A 'ralun^ — ---_--- - - building materials - -- B See Table 3n for r" ---- -- --^ _ - - R-Values o. - C training/insulation. ' _-.-�_-_ __---- ------- --_- - - _ D E Interior Surface 1. Total column(d) 2. LI-value. Invert the amount In line 1 I „�„ Worksheets 3-13 Worksheet 31) I,,.ont'd) ROOF UNALUES �enerlc (b) (c) — (d) ROOF • ` Layer Description Detail R-value See Table 3c for Exterior .; ,. } R-Values of • Surface p` I' exterior and interior surfaces. q Ab?M Rood !. eoy'itw i1�r• See Table 3c for - '— R-Values of air 0 B 5- spaces. aspaces. -- -- See Table 3b for C R-Values of --- building matenah, D See Table 3a for - R-Values of metal E ano wood stud/ Insulation and �� Interior hit w metal truss J Surface ^I ei- Insulation. 1. Total column(d) 2. U-value. Invert the amount In line 1 S f „re,l Worksheets 3-15 Technical Information FIBERGLAS Roof Insulation— GLASFAST/GYPTFC / Thermal Values Screw Selection Guide "R"Value Roof Insulation Insulation Thickness "C"Value Nominal Th!cknsss _ Length* Range .36 2.78 —'/." 2%" tip to 1'/." .273.70 3" 1"to 1%, 1716" 4' 2"to 21/,' .17 5.88 1'/te" 4'/," 2%'to 3" .16 6.26 — --T9; 5" 3"to 3'/," 15 6.67 1 ye" 5'h" 3'y"to 4" .14 7.14 1%, 6" 4"to 4%' .13 7.69 1%, 02" 4%"to 5' .12 3.33 2'/,e" 7" 5"to 61h" .11 9.09 2'/." 714" 5'/e"to 8" .10 10.00 tyle" 8" 6"to 6%, .09 11.11 2%' .08 12.50 3" .074 13.50 27," .071 14.00 31i2" 'On recover applications fastener length must consider total system thickness. GLASFAST/HEXTRA GLASFAST/STRIKER Screw Selection Guide _ Screw Selection Guide Screw Insulation Thickness Anchor Insulation Drill Bit Length* Minimum Maximum Length* Thickness' ANSI Size 1%. V 1%, 2" '/,"to 1" 2%' %. 2" 2'/," 1"to VA, �ie"x 6" 2'/e" 1'/." 2%' 3 1 ' "t to 2" 0 3%' 1'/." 3%' 4" -- 21n" io 3" --- 4%' 1'/." 4'/s" 4'/s" 3'to 314" 3i s"x 9'/j," 5" 2K" 4%' 5" 31/2"to 4" 6" 3'/," 5'b" 7"' 3%' 6%" — 8". 4%' _ 7%" 'On recover applications fastener length must consider total system thickness. 'On recovor applicatimts festsner length must consider total system thickness. FIBERGLAS Roof InaRulation—Physical Property Technical Data Property Inrulatlon Type Thickness ;relue Toost Method Compressive Stre,.gth a FIBERGLAS All 12 ps1025%deformation ASTM C165 Smoke Developed a FIRERGLAS All 20' ASTM E84 Flame Spread a FIBERGLAS All 20' ASTM E84 Water Absorption a FIBERGLAS All 10%max.,ave.by vol. OC OC-W-03F Vdpor Permacnce a FIBERGLAS All Les.)then 0,1' ASTM E96 Thermai Conductivity a FIBERGLAS All it=.24 to.27 A d C518 Flute Span s NBERGLAS All 1ZO ib. min. -OC-S-18B Puncture Strength - FIBERGLAS All 55 Ib.mi- OC OC-$-11E 'Unsurfaced board 'per ASHRAr dry-cup value FIBERGI. S Roof Insulation--Metal Deck Flute Span _ GIBERGLAS Roof Insulation Wid's Flute FIBERGLAS Roof Insulation" Max.Flute Max.Flute Thickness Span Thickness Span Inches Inches** Inches Inches" %81 2'h" 7i e" 2%' 1YW 2%- 1 e" 3'G" 17i e" 276" 1*/i e" 4%' 27s" -- — — — 'N.ede-toorder product. "Must have a minimum 2'bearing smrare between flute end no overhang Into flute. NOTES:Double layer flute span Is that of seine single layer thlrknas. Douhla layer bottom layer edges don't need to be edge supported.Howr sr top layer joints must he offset a minimum of 6-from bottom layer. 6 m N L C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O 'J tl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 D m m m m m m m UO m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m }}}y }}}}}}y } }}}}}}}}}yZ.ZZZZZZZZZZZZ27ZZZ H ID o m m o m s L O OI v U c n m o b q U C Y m q o � m a` C C C C N C C C C U m m m m m m w o mm m mam t, mm a FC' H NfTF� N v E a s a a� a s u. v m m G m a m 10 0 : E E E E E E t t y 4) m a m m m 79 v 0a0 v •� y N_ _ N7@ _ N m N_ _. N N N--_ m___ U _ _-_.- U U U U U to A> m d T N >OD « . N ClN > T r Cl 0 W 2 N 0 N m m m V d N N N mm O N 0 0 0 F. UOONNV(D>I;i 7d(D>C-n �/)Ntn07O7O7cnMrn2NlnNrnu/ut)EninininNUcUUU c O mu 0 a r. O V 0 m m 7 h c c m m n r o g m m m d m m > 0 ooa ¢� m _m' m o C E C 0 A; A m N W -0_ ' C Cx0 0 m m �EEEnE EyEE �,.B- EEm E N c .q r O 0C' J C m C C Fe C C a C C C C C t R I W w� t11 01 3 rT t.D a d d t \ t R t N °a. I I N I .N to 0.N d to to to to m T^ t t t C") > T E a C G T t c c v °`� C m C m O m m d 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 C A -Ea dS. oCaSc' v. ca� oo. :eOEp. p pilot . � E " u c) OEE. E OR 0E . EEO R EEa, mEmt mm t t t t Y t dna t t :)'e t t :r� t n t a t t•T�+lrt a n?'R a ma m.T' m mt _e'�;RT'. O.T'�.Z'�?r'- .?=�•.T�,r.-r.-._.T2.- r?�N.-r �-..-.- �•N N.T�:t=-to V)-to m.?=.-.-N.-.Z-r-.- N N 7 m r L O C t m u a 0) UVUUf)UUOJVUUUO'UUUUUUUUUUUUUUuuC) uUUUUUUUU D kk 0 Ua mmmtommmmmmmmromr.'wn(amrnmmmmwtommmmmmcommmmtomm v � aa�-iaddadaaadada� aca.`dQaaadadddadadddaddad 7 N N V1 W N N N N N N N N N N N t9 N N W N 0 N V) JI m V) N W N N N N 0 W N m N N N N S N N N m m_m_m m_m m_m_mm m 2 N W N 0 0 0 N W N N 0 W W 0 W N N N N 0 N N N W N 0 W 0 N N N N N N N m_ m_ m_ _ m m m m_ m mm m m m m m m m m a m m Ur0 _00UMm _3UU � _ U « O a Q U V n N a m y v m E c o N m o � W v m y 4 u m t c °«' C C m LL m a C N y N H N0 _ C �•4-1 N v m ? C . �L c m d = C C C t m L;.,k , !n O Om C V d y Ul I_ d d U V L C L L L M L M M L LCJ.C L .C C m .N /V CO N .m _ N N N O N O O N N N m A C « m L d, ,L� j L .._ L. O O O N 0 L N N Q O L m `0 m Nm� 0 .J Ir C N O W L L L O O C L L -* r O C L O L 0 n n L L L L O CO 22 r �� N - .- N �.- N. -�N �N n!NN.t R I I I 0 0 M M'7 [t U)CD U 070 N U)O r OlM CTS d tD CO O N co lnf-l7)Mr.d In ID r-CO 07htnNlnU ' N O '„ NNNn cq d C to to to(f) OO•- �0� •- •-•- N •- •- �NOOO.-mow N �y _ NNCJ V NN f)N NNN NNNN C to to to LD In In f� r�f� h f• f�G)W fD OD tD W CDOTtJI In tJ1 E y � N Z oz a 0, CLa 1a a 0.f1CLdf1LL 2f1rLa tLn [i (La. a n C1 I1CL6 a. n a dQ f14CLda CL0.mLL a 2 4 C M dC`yin.-dMNdto00NOCO'- dtDOLna,toM(D00N W 0U)r-M -lwCDOt00dpy H y M M.4 of la to(D r`h r`CO al M O O N N N d d to U)to to 00 CO CO 00 CJI M 0)0 N N N Cr O r d CD 0 m t0 to w to w t0 to tD 0 t0 r,nrnn n r r,r nr.nn 1Fr nt` r`"`00 ts7 CO fo to Z 7 ALUMI-LITLI'm ACRYLIC SKYLIGHTS AlumimlietwM Model:AL Model:AL-DD Model:AL-T The new standard of excellence in alu ninum frame skylights. Our new Alumi-literm was engineered frum thrr ground up to outperform every other aluminum frame a;kylight available. There are four systems to prevent water leaks.As many as four to prevent energy;oss.And Wbmountsd.single time. Curb mounted,double dome. Curb mounted,singled", two for unmatched security. It's s0 good only Bristol thermal break. Model.AL-T-DD Model:AL-T-TD Model AL-SF Fibarlite's own unique Therm-o-weld® skylights which chemically bonds a fiberglass trame and acrylic dome into 3 single unit,can outperform it. I ( But despite its outstanding performance the Alumi- _1 IiterM is very competitively priced. In fact, because we rr 11 manufacture more skylights than anybody were able to crromounted,aaub'edome, curbmourted.mpNtkme sen•neare^r.singledoine. sell the Alumi lite'" for sub0antially less than ordinary thermal break thermal break. Model.AL-SF-DD Model:AL-T-SF OD;,' Model:AI-T-SF-TD aluminum units from several other major manufacturers. Water has been engineered out. Primary zystem: unique aluminum outer cap clamps down with spring-like tension on a long lasting neoprene m 1._- r - r— 1 gasket (1) sealing out nearly all moisture. 6elt•aashlnt,doubkdome. Self-Ilashing,double dome, Sett-flashing,triple dome,tharmal Socondary system: large capacity inner gutter (2) thermal break, break. guiUps any moisture to disc,large ports (3) for drainage Alumi-liteTM acrylic skylights are available In 9 different con- out to the roof. (discharge ports are virtually immune to figurations depending upon the customer's Installation preferenr,s clogging by dirt or leaves due to their large ',, dieter am and climate. and the protection of the outer cap (4). tills case 0".=--usc notL cine eeEsan Seat Back-up-system: inner neoprene gasket (5) provides s l (inside 41mension) net eemeEe Insldedime_nsion) 101Eall additional barrier in the unlikely event water ever quAIIE eECTA8/utAO reached this point. 1414 141/4"041/4" 5" 2246 211/4"trAI&A" 5' Back-up-system: Large c,pacityc;alforztiveconden- 1919 19"x19" 5" 2272 221/4'x77' T' sate gutter (6) provides a final safeguard 2222 221/4'x22%" S" 2296 22'A"08" 10" 3036 301/4"001/7" 5" 3037 301/4"x3r' 5" Energy off Iclency has been engineered In. 3737 37"x3r' s' 3046 301/4",461/4" 5" Primary system: Large capacity evaporative conden- 4242 47'x42" 5" 3069 301/4"x8944" r' sate gutter(7)eliminates the need to drain condensation 4M6 481/4"0611" S" 30% 301/4"06" 10" 4848 48"x46' 5" 3496 31"x96" 10" 5555 55"x55" 6" 3746 37'061/4" 5" 1070 701/."x701/4" 7" 3775 3r'x75" 8" 7575 75"05" 8" 3359 36"x59" •5" 8494 84"04" 9" 4669 461/"x8954" T' 929'! 9244"0254" 10" 4689 481/i'x8954" 9" IECT.a�701A6 48M 48"x98" 10" _._ 46120 411"020' 12" out to the roof through energy robb:ng gaps in the frame. 1422 141/+'x221/" 5" 5460 54"x80" 6" Inner neoprene gasket (8) provides an aidight seal to 1448 141/4"x4854" 5" 6098 WOO" 10" hold energy in and drafts out. L_223r 221/4"x3r' 5" Optional system: double 2nd triple domes (9) provide AL — ACRYLIC SPECIFICATIONS additional insulation. Skylight Domes shall he No __- .__3s manufactured by Bristol Flbedile Indus- Optional System: non-heat conductive polymeric gut- idea,Santa Ana,Calif.The acrylic dome shall be engaped between aluminum extrusions of ter material (10) prevents thermal losses through the 6063—T5 alloy.A gasket shall he provided between all points of contact between acrylic frame. It also eliminates dripping by preventing the for- surface end aluminum.All water discharge pods In aiter cap shall be a minimum of a 44" mahOn Of condensation On interior surfaces.diameter,and shielded from alr-home debris by ext0or deflection shields.The skylight eesembiy shall be air tight with no air paths to ronn,ct the entedor of the building Optional system: 11h" thick insulation (11) substan- envelope to the exterior elements.A large capadly evaporative condensate gutter shall b� tially improves performance. an Integral pad of the unit.Aluminum exlrustions§hall be factory assembled with rivets from the Irside to assure no fasteners are vlrllbie from the exterior. Intruders have been engineered out. OPTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS Primary system: Frame members are permanently 1. Glazing shall consist of(two)(three)layers of cast acrylic plastic with d and air secured together by rivets (12) rather than assembled epi bei^• with removable screws. 2. The evaporal!ve condensate gutter shall be of nun-thermallycondur,fve polymeric Secondary system: Aluminum skirt(13)fully conceals material to prevent thermal losses through the home,as well as to proven'the to-matin of ry y idensefim on Interior frei sudaresrivets from view. 3- SNI Fleshing frame 1W include 4"Kek insulation material. s 7.8/Br c 98 SKYLIGHTS' we .r�- L ^C - 4 `J Curb invented,single glued. Curt mooted,doude glued. Curb meT•nted,single glared, (3� _ thermal break Curb mounted,double till ted, Sen-Hashing,single glared. Self-Mashing,double glared. thermal WL 3 So".h.,hing,dvijbie glared, Thermal break Alumi-litef M glass skylights a e available in 6 different configura- tions depending upon the customer's installatio-preferences and cfl- i) mate. OKL Clan Grua% �faxa► gala VINO romp linsido dimension) !r BONA tfnalde dimmelon) lI;W11E KCTAIf18lAM 1414 141/4"041/4" 1422 14Vex271/4" 1919 19"x19" 1446 MA"x481/4" 2222 22'/4"x22V 2237 22TA'k37' 2246 22W'081/4" 2[72 22V4''x77' For additional sties contact fadnTy 22M 22'/4"x98" SPECIFICATIONS Mess Skylights shall bt;No _ as manufactured by Bristol Fiberlite Indus- tries,Santa Ana,Calif.The glass glazing shall be engaged between aluminum extrusions of 6063—TS alloy.A gask rt shall be provided between aR pnints of contact between glass surface and aluminum.All,eater discharge ports In outer cap shall be a minimum ri a 14" diameter,and shielded from air-bome debris by exterior deflection Maids.The skylight assembly shall be air tight with no air paths to connect the Interior of the building envelope to the exterler elements.A large�;apacfty evaporative condensate gutter shall be an Integral pari of the unit.Aluminum extrustlons shall be factory assembled with rivets Imm the inside to assure no fasteners are visible from tra exterior. OPTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS 1 (hazing shall conMst of(tray)(three)layers o'cast glass with a dead air space be- tween. 2. The evenorative condensate gutter Shall be of nor.-thermally-conductive polymeric material to prevent thermal losses through the frame,as well as to prevent the formation of condensation on Interior frame surfaces. 3 Sell Flashing frame shall Include 114"thick Insulation material. '.l P Al � v',. � �' • _ no seals to dry out, no gaskets to crack, no gaps for specially formualted resin is hard, fire retardant, highly drafts to enter and no weep holes to clog. translucent,color stable, resistant to heat distortion and Bristolite's exclusive ✓ gelcoat barrier Conventional fiberglass Specially formulated resin reinforced plastic construction and fiberglass construction provides excellent filtration of uitra-violet. Our whie Therm-o-welds construction: no drips, no drafts. isothalic gelcoat forms a glass like finish which is highly Other acrylic skylights consist of 3 or 4 separate pieces plus resistent to chemicals, crazing and craLKing. It's also fasteners to hold them together so leaks around joints are a con- light stabilized and uses 100%pure titanium pigment for stant threat.By contrast,each Bristol Fiberlite acrylic dome is per manently fused too its fiberglass skirt, in effect. eliminating all additional ultra-violet absortion. joints. Self-flashing g Self-flashing simply means the skylight comes with Our new Alumi-liter"" line was designed to outper- its own aluminum mounting base form every other aluminum frame skylight available but so its ready to install on any com- is iery competitively priced. Alurni-lite skylights can position shingle or hot moppe 1 be ordered with acrylic or glass glazing and are de- roof. scribed in detail on pages 4 and All three types of skylights can Fiberglass be ordered with standard or insu- intended primarily for industrial applications, lated self-flashing frames. Bristolite fiberglass skylights are more than G times Therm-o-blockim,insulated self-flashing frame,is available with stronger than comparahlP. acrylic models. They're also Therm-o-weld®and fiberglass type skylights.Features include: 1. double or triple dome construction for greater insulation, dramatically superior in e,.retry ry respect to the fiberglass 2. large capacity evaporative condensate gutter which eliminates the skylights previously built by other manufacturers. Our need for potentially troublesome weep holes in the frame, 4 ter_ 7.8/B r a vinyl air seal to prevent drafts, 4. a thermal break to stop heat conduction through the aluminum frame 5. fiberglass insulation available in standard V or heavy duty 1'/2" \ thicknesses and 6. curb heights of 4",5",S"and 12",depending upon local snowfall. Insulated self-flashing frame for alumi-lite type skylights is de- scribed on pages 4 and 5. ) Curb rriomted �- Curb mounted skylights can be used on any type of roof but are required for tile, wood shake or wood shingle. They provide comparable '" < performance to insulated self-flash- ing units while costing less than uninsulatea self-flashing units. However, the cbstomer must con- struct the wooden curb, provide the _. necessary flasti!ng so installation .,.. goes less quickly. Thermalized skylights Thermalized double dome skylights should be con- sidered in cooler climates where heat losses and con- densation are more significant. Because our exr;usive Therm-o-weldT"' construc- tion forms a "dead air" space between the inner and outer domes Bristolite double domes deliver unbeatable performance. U VALUE8 oTU/HR/8q.Ft./'F Single Double Winter _ _ Dome Dome Heat loss 05 mph wind)^ 1.2 0.7 Summer Heat gain(7.5 mph wind) 0.9 0.5 Nota: During extended periods of !emperature and humidity differential condensation may form between double domes.However, once this differential is reduced the condensation will disappear. Burglar resistant skyligl,tts By simply increasing the laminate thickness all Bristolite fiberglass skylights meet burg!ar resistant �.. standard UL 9i2. Our acrylic models aleo can be modified to conform.For these we fuse an inner sheet of polycarbonate under a highly weather-resistent acrylic dome thus achieving both improved security and long lasting beauty. To order include the designation BR. Excessive snow load modifications Although flat acrylic is actually stronger than tem- pered glass, most skylights have a domed shape to further increase load carrying strength. However, in areas where extremely heavy snow fall is possible it is advisable to specify a heavier gauge dome material.To _- order include the designation R(Reinforced). _ Note:Bristolite*skylights are designed to withstond normal elements of the weather,however,they are not de,,gned to with- stand humsn Impact or felling objects and they should not be y walked upon under any circumstances. The owner or designer should restrict access to authorized personnel who have been adequately cautioned as to the location of the skylights and informed of the warnings stated above or protertive guardrails or screens should be provided. 5 I May 2, 1994 Sera Architects CITY OF TIGA9RD 123 NW Second Avenue CV Portland, OR 97209 OREGON Project: Beaverton Honda Plan Check #4-29C 10380 SW Ca8cade Boulevard Subject: Building Plan Review ( 1991 UBC with Oregon Amendments) The plans for this project were reviewed for conformity with applicable codes. Please submit the following items for completion of the plan review process at your earliest conveniences 1. What is the type of construction for the existing building? Different types of construction require separation walls par 505(.f) with openings to be protected (section 1701(a) ) . 2. Submit mechanical plans for review. 3. Submit the Oregon energy compliance form for review. P ease specify on the plans the R-val.ues for the various types of insulation used. 4 . Submit V.e manufacturer's details and installation instructions (attachment to roof deck) for the rigid roof insulation. 5. One in eight accessible parking spaces, but not less than one, shall be served by an access aisle 96 inches wide minimum and shall be Designated van accessible (Table 31-A, figure 9, and section 3104 (g)2B) . Please submit a signage detail. for the van accessible spaces . 6. Rey-locking hardwarra may be used on the main exit only, if there is a readily visible, durable sign on or adjacent f .) the door stating, 'THIS DOOR MUST REMAIN UNLOCKED DUR314G BUSINESS HOURS" (section 3304(c) exception) . Other doors to have lever hardware. 7. Provide a drinking fountain on each floor per Table 5-E, Section 31.08(d) 1 and figure 27 of Chapter 31. 8. Where there are no toilet rooms and bathing facilities In an addition and these facilities are provided in the existing building, then at least one toilet and bathing facility In the existing facility shall_ comply with Section 3112(c:)7 (section 3111 exception 3) . 9. The ground floor is required to have two exits which are separated per 3303(c) with all doors swinging in the direction of egress (3304(b) ) , as the occupant load is greater than 50 (Table 33-A) . 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 6;,9-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 -1 10. Handrails projecting from a wall shall have a space not less than 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail (section 3306(j.) ) . See detail 5/A5. 11. No detail exists for 6/A5 as specified on sheet A4 . 12 . When two or more exits are required from a room or area, exit sicTns shall be installed at the required exits from the room or area and where otherwise necessary to clearly indicate the direction or egress (secticrL 3314(a) ) . 13. Glass skylights to comply with Chapter 34 . Submit the manufacturer's specifications for installation. 14 . Glazing subject to human impact shall comply with section 5406 . 15. Submit two copies of the construction documents (specification book) . 16 . At your earliest convenience, please complete the attached form and return to the Building Division. 17 . Construction joints, such as those used to accommodate wind, seismic or expansion movements, installed in fire-resistive walls required to have protected openings or in floors shall be protected with an approved material or construction assembly designed to provide the same degree of fire resistance as tr.:., floor or wall in which it is installed in accordance with UBC Standard No. 43-1. See Section 4302(b) (section 1707) . 18. Ple;,se explain in detail the intended use for the second floor (sto)-age, office, etc. ) . The, following site review concerns are noted: 1. S.-w compliance with all of USA's erosion control guidelines (sediment fence every 300 feet, etc. ) . 2. What is the volume of cut and the volume of fill in cubic yards? The following structural concerns are noted: 1. Address temporary shoring provisions for rh-- „-1--vator pit which undermines the existing building footing between gridlines 4 .5 and 5 at - 2 . Submit the ICBO n1un er for Wej-it's. 3. Detail supports fcr new 2-1/2 K 13.5 purlins at the existing building are not shown. 4 . Roof framing calculations do not: exist, however, it appears that. mezzanine floor framing has been called at roof framing? 5. Special inspections are required for concrete, welding, masonry, and high-strength bolting. 6 . Submit the ICBG number for anchor-it-fastening systems. 7 . Out of plane anchorage for existing roof at 13/S4? 8. Detail connection of C12 K' 20. 7 to column and/or wall at second floor- gridline A4 . 9 Submit geotechnical report for review. 10 . Submit the ICBO number for Rawl-studs. 11. What is the intended use for the future third floor? 12 . Sheet W5 of the calculations- check CMU wall for seismic out-of- plane. 13. Why is there no grade beam at F'? 14 . Section 2334(a) requires 25% of live floor_ loads for storage occupancies to be included .in seismic dead load. 15. Post l .ve loads per section 2305(e) . 16 . Submit the ICBO number for the floor and roof decks. 17 . Live loads greater than 100 pounds per square foot cannot be reduced (Table 23-A and section 2306) . Calculations shore a reduction from 1.25 to 75 pounds per square foot. Please contact David Scott, P.E. to discuss the structural concerns listed above. Please make these corrections on the appropriate pages of the drawings and resubmit 3 copies of each page to the City of Tigard for review. This plan review does not +.nclude electrical or plumbing plan reviews. Electrical concerns can be directed to Washington County at 640-3470 and plumbing concerns to Mike Sheehan at the City of Tigard at 639-4171 extension 312. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely,, Mark Burrows Plans Examiner FAX (503) 684-7297 .b/pe.14 7q A-X DATE: PLANS CHECK NO.: ill-22- -1 I .. /- - -,,-1r-, PF'OJECT TITLE:: COUNTYWIDE ld(�ac�� r- r;� , f11� c�, �i���, TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLI^•ANT: — WORKSHEET (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) LI/ G ADDRE Cv S - za tull e 4c (Z CfTY/ZIP/PHONE: RATE PER — IAND USE CATEGORY TRIP TAX MAP NO.: RESIDENTIAL $152.00 2- AUSINESS U _ AND COMMERCIAL $38.00 SITUS NO.ADDRESS- OFTICE $140.00- u3 �-,J s C"c1 INDUSTRIAL 147.00 INSTITUTIONAL. $63.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT INSTTTID IONAL ONLY: BANCROFT ROMISSORY NOT O USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE EEKORI AY AVG TP RA WEUENO AVE TRIP RATE DEFER TO OCCUPANCY ��0 - SPu /�c.�s y, >IS, L BASIS: c cu2,, !!- 6 7 7 y /i.l�ElL�<G 2ft{l1`Z{Z`),� 14 7 y CALCULATIONS: –f-op t /uG�- – w�l 1w1 s c_ I ,y /y 2_ G v TG-S I- X trap hate- A 0 7 5'. 774/ x . � � �� Uv O ~ y / b l-ftClii f l Oa✓ - -,ro Pf V e/Vi - r[I!�t T/ fvipq V4 4e- A $3 7 = Tl PROJECT TRW GENERATIOIt 6, -7 7 k/ 40. G k �x_,a 3 8 = g� 4: $ q LG..oo � t 7-35- - O& ,v0 MUMONAI.IVO*MS: FOR ACCOAtrm PIxIPom Oar. 3 c • .. RtaAo AMT i-- ,Nu = 3,8 q TRANSTTAMT.: 8 PREP BY: I CC WASHINGTON COUNTY TIF NOTEBOOK form!i110 Commercial Building Permit Application City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-0 171 JobsIte Address: 1n3sz) sw cejlk f4al- Tenant: te0 NOY111 Suite# Valuation-A QQ Owner: hLem JA AdLtd. Address: L�IJ Pning,*..".,,., Phone: Contractor: t)J,yV',5,-.n to,Id Address: —74& sf- &Q)d (Itia,us oK L-)6 Type of oDnst: -,!tone: ,Z V Occupancy class: '1 Contractor's License # ��,�C!`U C rj, I Sprinklered? Yes No (attach copy of current on license)- Sq.ft. of project:_ Story (1st, 2nd, etc.) Archhect/Engineer: Ye va (74 Proposed use: Address: Previous use: F,3,41a-d 0 of Note: Plumbing"& inecItanicil plans must be submitted at time of Phone: buil ft permit application. COMMENTS: Applicant Signature & Phone number Received by.,. Date Received: J t Permit x Account Description Amount Amt. Pd. Bal. D,v Bldg. Permit (BUII.J) Plumb. Permit (PLUMB) _ Mech. Permit (MECH) State Tax (TAX) Bldg: Plumb: Mech: Plan Check (PLANCK) Bldg: — Plumb. Mech: Sewer Connection (SWUSA) Sewer Inspection (SWINSP) _ Parks Dev Charge (PKSDC) Storm Ora.nage Chg (SDSDC) Residential TIF (TIF-R) Mass Transit TIF (TIF-MT) Commercial TIF (TIF-C) Industrial TIF (TIF-1) Institutional TIF (TIF-IS) Office TIF (TIF-0) Water Ouality (WOUAL)-•,�:...... ..M_.. __-- -_ Water Guantity (WOUANP Fire District (FIRE) TOTALS: Commercial Building Permit_ Application City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (50 ) 639-4171 r Jobsite Address: ly-_ZS V W Office Use Onlyh 4 Tenant i ►q 0 Ite # r �'(artdclReo# h Valuation: 1�,,,Yjl7f'owner' t (` Address: IS 6triVa/ ulred k 4 (JuCQ Planning `" �j1/�J� IS Phone- 6 rEtigineeruig 611"4 fyf Contractor: -"_r�I o vs NA�Sv. t t d1 )Address: 04[e 7 5 L1 (6-k u4 Type of const: ►1t- �I 1 Occupancy class: Phone: Sprinklered? Yea) No Contractor's License # X113'{Q (attach copy of current Oregon license) Sq• tt- of project: ==� Sto (fes. '?^':, etc.) Architect/Engineer: `3.rIr A �TtZc�t_j �� . Proposeso: �2 � Address: JI l Z3 A., W• s��:,vs.P 1�` Previous use: K V U.-I c� �o•` 4�� ���; Note: Plumbing & mechanical plans _ must be submitted at time of i _ Phone: 2.2-%- (6 14 Lf y / building permit application. COMMENTS: ... 3 __ Applicant Signature & Phone number Received by• Date Received: Permit tt Account npscription Amount Amt. Pd. @al. Due 8(,f 9q— Bldg. Permit (BUILD) 1533,cgt.� Plumb. Permit (PLUMB) Mech. Permit (MECH) State Tax (TAS .- Bldg: Plumb: Mech: 7°. Plan Check (PLANCK) Bldg: Plumb: I0�1 fAech: Sewer Connection (SWUSA) Sewer Inspection (SWINSP) Parks Dev Charge (PKSDC) Olt Storm Drainage Chg (SDSDC) Residential TIF (TIF-R) Mass T,ansit TIF (TIF44T) --"T—•-3 ` tL Commercial TIF (TIF-C) dp Industdal T!F M174) 3-- 8,31 y j� Institutional TIF (TIF-IS) - - Office TIF (TIF-0) Water Quality (WOUAL)7---�-. _- -_ Water Quantity.._ . .(WQUANT).i :, Fire District (FIRE) n TOTALS: 146 (��1� I •�f G. Z0-0 1 CITY (IF' T MORD — REi:C:F I PT OF F'f;YME.N T F2F::C:F I PI NO. %91. _L351 IS (.,NF:(';Y. AMOUNT a 687. 70 '1011F: A MOOR I SON CONSTRUCTION CASH AMCI(.IN T a 0.00 d11DFtl=.£3>3 t PAYhIE:'NI' DATV a 04/14/94 90W)LVISION a Ill�l'l7!3Ei CIF F'WYMF:Nl' F1MUl1hIT F'''11D 1='IIFtPOCIF'. OF PAYMF_hIT' F11101INT PAID _......... .......»..__.. .........._............. _ .. _.„........._�. _.........__.._..__. .... _.. _.... _....._..._.._.__._.._. AN CHECK VT 687. 70 4.380 SW GASC:ADF' BLVD :F'.AVF.RTCIN HONDA (:1 T W1. AMOWMT PAID D .-. _. __ > fa L3% , 7F1 Construction In • spection v Related Testa Carlson Tes}t.ln,2, Inc . Geotecbtitt.•al Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tlgtvd, Oregon 97218 Phone: (5(3) 68,1.3460 FAX: (r,(0) 5e4-0954 March i , 1994 #94--1177 RECEIVE Morrison Building Corporation MAR 41994 91.60 SE Lhwnfield Fid. Clackamas, OR 97015 T.M. RIPPEY CONSULTING EN)iNEEFAS Attention: Steve Morrison FOUNDATION INVESTIGATILN NEW BEAVERTON HONDA BUILDING AT 1.0380 SW CASCADE BLVD. TIGMW,. OREGON Dear Kr. Morr., son: This report presents the results of our foundation investigation for the proposed Beaverton Honda building. The purpose of our investigation is to provide geotechnical evaluations and. recommendations for tho proposed building. This investigation was performed as per your verbal request. BACKGROUND Sita Description The site is adjacent to an existing Beaverton Honda-Yamaha Building, just west of Nwy 217 . The site elevation is about 180 ft above sea level and the site is essentially level . Presently the entire building site is covered in asphalt and has been used for parking and storage for the adjacent building. proposed Cons ruction We have reviewed the Ground Floor Plan that you provided. The plan indicates that the new building will cover appr_ox mately 1., 900 sq f.t'. From a discussion with the, structural engineer. , it is our understanding that the proposed building is to ?^e a two-story concrete block masonry building, designed to hold a third story at a later date. Future waxi.mwn interior column (7-inch steel. square tubes) footing loads are estimated to be on the order of. 105 .5 kips . Maxinitim perimeter. CMU pilaster and continuous footing loads are anticipated to be 51 .7 kips And 4 .4 k-ip/ft, respectively. The finished floor. elevation is expectod to be within 1 to 2 ft of the existing ground elevat.ialt. ' r - 94-1177 Morrison Building Corporation Page 2 Pxoiect Data cntioa -NW of the intersection of Hwy 717 and Greenburg Rd, on the east side of SW Cascade Blvd (Thomas Bros . Map 565, Grid Colurrr: D: Row 2, 1.994 ed. ) . Developer - Morrison Building Coz:porat .on Address above on title p-ige. Structural Engineer - Tim Rippey (ph. 244-0260 . Jurisdictional Ageucy - City of Tigard Building Departmont. GF.OTAGY/S B XSMIC I TY The site is located in the NW-trending Tualatin Basin, a gentle syncline w;.th faulting along its northeastern and eastern margins where it meets ':he Tualatin Mountains . The Tualatin Basin reaches a maximum depth of 1500-1600 ft with several folded or faulted structural highs and lows within its interior. The Honda Huilding site is located over approximately 60 £t of fine-grained flood deposits (Off) . Below the flood deposits, depth to basement rock River Bas- " '.cr) at the site is approximately 250 ft . Based on review of the Boaver.ton quadrangle geologic. map from Earthquake Hazard Geology !�aps of the Portland Metropolitan Area (IISGS Open File Report 0--90-2. ) , the closest possible fault: is an inferred normal fault that, occurs approximately 250 ft northeast of the site. The fault Is inferred from offsets in the 1.5 million- year-old basement rocks below 200 ft depth. The inferred fatil t. trends approximately N700F. No other evidence is currently available to determine if this inferred fault truly exists and if so, whether_ It is still active. No other faults in the vicinity have been shown to cut Holocene deposits during the past 1. 1 , 000 yelrs which could indicate active faulting. The entire Western Region of Oregon has been upgraded to a TIBC Seismic: zone 3 . To our knowledge, tho site is not in an area prone to inordinate local seismic activity. Although the site is close to a mapped inferred fault, it is our opinion that. the m-i^oed offset is not conclusive evidence of active local faulting. Base•i on our review, the URC seismic soil profile type (Table No. 23--Jj that best models the site subsurface conditions is "SZ" and U;IC Seismic- Zone 3 should be adequate for earthquake resistance desigii . 94-•1177 Morrison Building Cc.rporat.ion Page 3 FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND TESTING A general description of the field exploration procedures, and the test pit hogs, are presented in Appendix A. The test pit locations a.;;e shown on the Site Plan, attached as Figure 1. Laboratory testing procedures and the test results are presented in Appendix B. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Our test pits encountered up to l} ft Of fill/topsoil over native SILT. The fill/topsoil. was encountered along the SW building site boundary and is classified as a brown SILT with some clay and is slightl.- organic . The native subsoil is classified as SILT with some clay (ML) and varies in color from blue-gray to brown with streaks of bl_-ae-gray and orange. This soil is slichtly to moderately plastic, damp to moist, and stiff to hard. The maximum depth explored was 10 £t . All test pits ended within the native SILT. No groundwater table was encountered. Please refer to the logs of test pits .in Appendix A for details on the subsurface conditions. EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Ge09ra1 It is our opinion that the proposed construction is geot:echnic-ally compatible with the subsurface conditions oncountered in this investigation, Provided the recommendations of this' report are incorporated into the design and construction of the development. It is also our opinion that the structure may be founded on shallow spread footings on native soil . The near-surface on-site soils are typical, of Portland--area fine-- gxai_ned flood deposits which gen©rally have a low expansion potential; therefore, no expansion index testing was performed as a part of th.i-q st+,dy. The Soil Conservation Servi_r,e mapping for Washingtot4 County coc,curs that the soils have a low shrink-swell rating. 94--11.77 Morrison Building Corporation pages 4 Pre a t�oJr Existing asphalt and other structures within the buildincl footprint should first be demolished And removed. Existing topsoil should be stripped. Stri n _ti�X tions shou,Ld be ob-erved and rloc►unented PY-t e Somal_ Enait�eer, or h a r 'ji entatxv�. Based on our explorations, the maximtun depth of topsoil removal is 11 ft, but: is generally leas, than } ft. The buildinq pad should be proofrolled and a working pad layer of 11 `0 crushed rock should be placed. The thickness of this layer should be determined after Froofrolling, but should be a minimum of 6 inches . F-cPndat ons The proposed structure can be founded on shallow spread footings bearing on native soils or replacement engineered fill . ' For protection against frost heave, footings should have a minimum embedment depth of 19 inches on level, ground. Footing construction and slope setback requirements should conform to Section 2.907 of the Uniform Building Code. The minimum footing widths for continuous wall and pad footings should be 18 and 24 inches, respectively. The allowable bearing calacity may be takers a<?,500 lb/ft' for footings bearing on competent native subsoils or'emgi:teered fill. The Coefficient of friction between soil and poured-in--place concrete may be taken as 0 . 35 . The maximum anticipated total ar,d differential footing movements (generally from settlement) are ono inch and one half inch over a span of 20 feet, respectively. ZZs-c-n-�,_r,ade The x,•eworked engineered soil fill a A slab base layer should be tested for compaction in conformance with the engineered fill xequixemQnts . The base rock course shot,ld consist of at least 6 inches of l+i °-0 crushed aggregate base. We recommend that a vapor barrier be placed boneath all interior slab areas . Such protection is especially imp0I_L.=..,t if moisture_ sensitive floor coverings (vinyl and wood flooring, floor tile, etc . will be placed over the slabs . The vapor barrier �ateria.ls should be applicable for the intended use ana pr of recognized long--term stability when buried in adamptssci,l environment and should be located as near to the base of the slab as feasible, without adversely af;:ecttng concrete slab curing or shrinkage cracking. The Archi.tnct or Engineer should use his experience for placement of any sand layer relative to the ,•.spor barrier to help offset these potential problems. Y. 94-1177 Morrison Building Corporation Page 5 t P+n<Ifn� Qred Fill All fill lacement should be pe�:formed in accordance with Chapter '. 70 of the Uniform Building Code, with the exceptions and additions i noted hergin. Fill should be compacted in horizontal lifts not a exceeding 9 inches using standard compaction equipment. A minimum of 90 percent of the maximtur dry density obtained from the modified Proctor, ASTM D 1557 or equivalent standard (AASHTO T-180) is recommended. All engineered fill should be observed and tested by the Soil Engineer's representative. The native soils are at a moisture content well above optimum for compaction. Earthwork utilizing on-site soils will be restricted to the dry-weather months, generally frim mid-June to mid-October, when proper moisture conditioning of soils can be performed. Earthwork accomplished during the wet weather; seasons will require other measures such as imported granulir fill or lire treatment to place and sufficiently compact :engineered fill . x T�tilitfes All. deep excavations and shoring should conform to OSHA regulations (29 CFR Part 1926) . It is our opinion that the majority of the on-- site near--surface soils are OSHA "Type A" soils. The walls of temporary construction trenches are expected to stand nearly vertical , with only minor sloughing, to a maxi.muni depth of 4 feet from construction grade. All trench backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximtun dry density obtained from ASTM D 1557, or equivalent standard. Remi ?mac Walls The following equi,ralent:-fluid lateral, soil pressures art- recommended r_erecommended for design of any basement walls and retaining structures using free-draining 3.;anular material as backfill and having a level soil profile; i.f on-site noils are used as backfill there the values in parenthe.ies should be used: �6 w 94-1.17 7 1 Morrison Building Corpor.nt:i.on Page 6 TABLE 1: Rl?COMMENDED LATERAL PRESSURES �M ,+ r SOIL PRESSURE ( lb/ft') -- - -T-- TYPE Unrestrained Wall Re .t:r.ained Wall Active Pressure 30 (40) At-rest Pressure -- 50 (60) Passive Pressure 325 (275)* ^� * The upper 0. 5 foot should be ignored for passive resistance These values assume that: no traffic loads, hydrostatic pressures, or other surcharges exist . The coefficient of friction between soil, and poured-in--place concrete may be taken as 0. 35 . A wall drain should be placed behind the wall at it's base; when using on-site soils for backfill a 1--foot wide layer of clean sand should be placed immediately behind the wall for its , entire length. The sanr+ layer; should extend from the wall, drain at the bottom of the wall to within 1-foot of burface of the backfill . The wall drain should consist: of a minimum 4-inch diameter, Schedule 40 PVC perforated pipe enveloped .in a minimum of 5 ft'/ft of V4" open graded gravel wrapped with geofabric filter material (Amoco 4545, Trevira 7120, or equivalent) . A minimum of one-half percent fall should be maintained throughout the wall strain and outfall . Retaining wall backfill supporting walkways, concrete slabs, and other- structures should be compacted to at least cL) percent of the maximuun density obtainable by the modified Proctor (ASTM D 1557) . i a 94-11.77 Morrison F3ui--1-ding Corporation page 7 GENER&L NOTES This report was prep:. ed solely for t.110 Owner and g„gineer for. the We.r e its de6ign of the project• elates toyfacreview factual data only (testrpitsdand �+ the contractor as it. z Thp opinions and recon�niendations contains laboratory' data) • to be within the report are n at intenof subsurfac.eocond tions but are z construed to represent a w �rantyand do-sign n p rocess . forwarded to assist In the planning g ace if, during construction, unexp encountered within excavations, re t � shauldsbef notified atlons oncoaso that we may review such conditions and revise our recommendations, it necessary . We would be pleased to provide additionai input., as necessary, on and during the design process nd Plepsevfeelofreettoocont actius for testing during construction this work as well as for any questions you might have regarding this report. Sincerely, CARLSON T&7S1j.NG4- INC . Z% � ,' 14743 Gi 05 OREGON A., v 4._ 23W��j9 4,.CIL 0cor, By Ruth A. Wilmoth, R.G. James D. Xmbrie, p •F• Senior_ Geologist vice President. Reviewed By_— q� Douglas W. Leach ti Pxesident r i i' 1 1 GE Approximate location of test pit SCALE: I 10' A 10 20 30 40 ft Tv-3 0.0or / I I i i NCf�7C! G o N u- f' N � ro O m N AMMOWN x �•Kwtcfuu ntirt Na- f .ar-n�ran TP-1CL 10 T -'4 a 141rr = - V TP-2 1 +-1 A"Iy r Feb. 1994 5&K-& Archl ItiD 15 '. ,lob Hurnt-r Rite plan by Sern A rchirecl+provided by"Orr" Ruilding Corp. 94--11 '17 i i UHe 'i APPENDIX A FXML.D INVESTICATTON BKpIQMtory TEe_ Pits our scope of work ckhPwasused exc:vate hinvestigation ttuded dthe test test p Pits - Pits , '1'he A rubber-tizPci backhoe explorations are weretexcavaapproximatted on eFebruaryan own 16,0 1994,. rto ldepths three test pits ranging from 5. 5 ft to 10 ft. Within the test pits, representative samples of the various soil units were taken and placed in airtight jars and i.l bulk bucket samples . RPlativa strength measurements were made in the fine- grained sedi.nients within the test pits with a pocket Penetrometer, a manually operated ,Aevice used to approximately determine the in- situ rela*ive strength of cohesive so.ils . An experienced tee logis, from our firm classified the soil units, logged obtained the reguixed samples, and generally directed the field exploration opf:rations . Logs of -he exploratory test pits are presented on Fiqures A-1 through A--3 . -• A-1 - Test Pit No. TP- 1 Logged by: RAIN Date Excavated: 2-16-04 Location: West end of building site Su(faC13 Elevation: -180ft W a V �, a Material Description CL v o AL /) 0 o 4 V _ _--�•--•--.- SILT with some clay (ML), brown, slightly plastic, moist, 1 0 roots _I`foRsoi0 2 2.0 14.0 SILT with sand (ML), blue-gray, slightly plastic, moist, micaceous 3 2.5 4 1.5 __ 5 0.5 2g,4 Transitions to -- bluegray streaked_with orancde mattl�.s, mod- 5 - plastic at 4.5 ft Tra.isitions to brown with occasional blue streak and damp 0 7 at6ft 8 34.1 9 LJ Bottom of test pit at 10 ft. 11 Slight groundwater seep at -6 ft filled test pit with about 4 inches of water in about 2 hours; soirce of seep 12 appeares to be frorn lower, adjacent lot to the west. 13- 14- 15- 16. 3141516 17 I CJob No. 94- 1177 Log of Test Pit Figure: A-1 LSOti Carlson Testing, Inc. - P.O. Box 2.3814- Tipnt, Oregon 07281 -684-3460 - Fax 684-0954 t J Test Pit No. TP- 2 tIFLogged by: RAVV Date Excavated: 2-16-94 Location: South end of building site Surface Elevation: -•1$0 ft _ o ,� oF- a c a 0 Material Description CL c� C MQ O o a° a. ASP11W . SILT with some clay (ML), blue-gray, slightly plastic, moist, 1 4.54 micaceous 4.5+ 22.9 100.4 3 4.0 22.9 99.1 (Native - 4 2�- Transitions to brown at 4 ft I 5 32.2 7 — Bottom of test pit at 7 ft. 8 No groundwater encountered. I 9 11 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- i I APPF.:dD1X B LA30RATORY TESTING Classi'ficati.on,_Water Contents and Unit Weights Soil conditions were evaluated, described, and classified in accordance with the classification format described in the Oregon Department of 'transportation Soil, and Rock Classification Manual. (ODOT Highway Division, 1987 ) , based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Natural moisture cuntenta were taker in jars; all samples were tested in accordance with ASTM D 2216 . The moisture contents are expressed as a percentage of free water lost by evaporation compared to the dry weight of soil . These ,re presented num�irical.l.y on the Test Pit Logs . Consolidation A consolidation test was performed on a representative sample of the native soils for purpoc.es of evaluating settlement. Consolidation testing results in a plot of strain reeponse versus the logarithm of applied .:ormal stress , The test is performed by adding increasing stress increments to a 1--inch-thick specimen and allowing sufficient time for primary consolidation strains to occur. Final logarithmic plot of stress ver.stis strain for the consolidation tests is presented on Figure B-1 . - B-1 - 1 ' Consolidation New Honda Tigard, Or,,gon t t I IIu II_I unun 11n t' 1 Nn G At II �r'�ii'='1 Pit, f 1 1 Wlin f III oil �tu'r��miff ■/ MI Ilal "NIIUWU� Iilun�panally I_:�w I cul {�j rauamar ii IInmllMml 11 I I!.s{t � nlN81q 1 'ItNI �p ��tt� 1111 ff''IU !NM�p A1� ihln, 11� IIIUIIIA I 1 11 I fM 1 Ultl All/II .. 1�p6'^t�I1Q�l r 1 I ■� ��Iull��'em■II I� tN81t a;�ew � a ���Ii 1 hmm��pp 111 11 IAuu1pN �I IIfR ■ p,�rR IA IIWIf I ME II�I�pU I 1 fill lrl DCII IIM Ip�p ■ I IIS 111111111 1 1m, III II IAI I UI p U IYII � 111 ill 11114 nlll�{ 1 ryeI Q fI III f pp`� [Is I,`IWu��BtatCt� frlil I (1 If �� I I Nn11WN/ IIIIIIQ pp p � i! IUI 1A IIAh`,I IIIG�Cp�.�� I �tl!ff ( m m. ■ I an c r /���II A I I ! au �i 1� I I QB Nil lot IIUIB 11 I I�H fl@UU�C/ QIII I NIN �11�j`�1R Ir ■ tl I�Y n��'I II uw uululnun m �iin it �'■i/ullill� a Ino 0 if ini 11111111'in t IppI fp ullAl �IiII� llIilin II'u� a li III111tl11Criii/pllilll� it �I Iq In 11 '1p'�w1'■ iii ° 811 011111 11 I) Ij IIU NUII Ib�Isl��ll I lc■/1 II Yllta fl n CI 19¢ Ip I I(� 1��11 �i�lflu * I �g ul 1 pp��IIIIIIIIWuIN 1111111 II UIIIN ■ 1 I! lull llpll�l � I I nfl In/I �u 1 III11 .1 I. i1t11�Ilmin�llnl 1lII,'laIII 1�19 .� ■II'llunnliu I mu 111n IN I I ul nm In IIu �m lu■ar ■ I II � �uufIpNg1�IIcpq, 1 11 1 WRwgBa �pinlpUlC 1 Illlit IB IQRIIu t 1 ■■■f 1 1pIIIM1Gp1. a of 11�l 1�UtIQIQIppI ■ 1loll t�a NnI UI 1 I �jNQIII •ff 1 tt IIUInUlll11 list II GIN tMlftalCU�■1 nIIIlr�Upn�;lpt� 1 Ali "ii I1 �np��I��a ■ 11 nuuo null umn Im IIIItIIUhIAI!IW",s I I um� IIII�11/6111 �f 1 I jtp ! WI N u � lil I/IIBQI IIIIINII 0 ■■�lunll n 1 I 11 U 1611 �■ 1 In j b6 PUHI . IN: ���� C ICUIIInINIInll11Il fi IINI1111 11 ll 111 �rtllr■■ isiri nn I I �Bill lmu nlnl ' i=Hlnu�nwuln nu �� ■' ro nein@ ■ UPI nl m�Mua ■ unu n I � i u ■ 1 IIn Et. 1ppIpp11 NUBG��fil 1�1 I IIIIC IIIIOIIfAIG�tliUKIIloll I� pI 1q� j !il NIG ■ 11 11 IIIII IIIIIIUI III■ ///:1111 I qq Hit to ■Mil IIII I IUN n11 N IIII I 1 11 1ppn III 811 �fl 1 I I AI I 11118111{1611 ■/ 1111111 I �I �11n1 I I�I I 1 111n I U IB IM ■ III II 1 �ti11A111 ■ is 1 W I 911 Ip � II 11 t 1 II II ftl I If Ip� i�� a IIII n I AIC IID libu�iie iii�i 11 rq1 8"{1In I lots I [prq IIHMqq�� IRS o qI ! Itl ■ 11 i 11 IU I QII II m ■ Hill Iloilo n I U I t liliu N I fn� 1�1p E�q � I'q { II IIID ■■�t11111�I1tNINIluuIIfIBIC1 Ir I IIN Ia111IIIAIUkv ! 11 UIUIIIIrt1Il■■IIIIIIIIIIUI UI UUIId11N�'ll NBiO IIA 1 RlgmI'�w_il �lii�lfl pNp�il Iii�( �� I ■ I It r nu�j r �� m ulunlNlm�ii ■ �ul fl1I11 � ■, it 8101 nrIMUIIRd(s 11 Il 1 1�l I Mile I IIIIIUIOR ■III 111t11 uIn up1111 � 1 UI M It l 81 11 I I IIIYII 111 II n1 l �I ,1 N UIulU��ppllilrlfYuii 1aW Ian I Ir�a {N�ur�CHpI lu Ol0 Miall 411u� I IUD 1 II ■ 1 HIM 11 I i fill t� III I IUD(�NgNA10 MINE I BID 11 n Ifp I'lllp"�'UI4p Ii ■_ IrNaU IRU7 p URI IC GIIiniMIH Ia1A11p111BH1/II IIIHfN I I Jt� / 11! W II11AIIAU UC 1 ■■1 �) 111N IUCIIt�u�uNNNNuIII1tlUb101 ;I;�I I1 Itl1�1Uuu�tlll Itlf1r111 I� U b; mlNll UItIIN1 EN ■■■ I; �uullu__.__IIIIRunI� ICI!■ I IaU �1 44' Itll■ 1 INI jI( ■�/II 111 11111Wi1NI III III �jtl�IIY I III I I U n Id RLIC " IIII IIIAC �� IN 81UMIIr1 I p 11'a 11 1 � 111 �1 I IryII A II .■ 11��1 I IrIIABI { ►fl IC � III 1 I guar I I Ali. I 1 sU U n +N � I II 1 � 111111 I Job No. 94- 1177 I 111 . . , • �Esnw��•C G'4 .)-f f-- C..i A I I : 0 L- M c U X I?W,C7 f°t.1- TL- x Cv7 IDL= 2.4 Y� f L`!, L,(- L Lz T p c,-V.v oLV = ri-o n 7-1 0 oV �a 14' t.-1 I ►� e hl fin . � t -�'a- �•�p �- - „t�►+v �,n�':�1r�;� ', ip= ��7.5�'ll = I1,7>p�•� 1. 1, ti l VO t~. k C _ i Ilei n I`3 - 21/0 /Zd F rNt rtrnrEY - CONSULTING EKG,.N[ER5 9221 S W.Sarbur Blvd.,Suite 105 Portland,Oreson 97219 ----.-- Phor,('(503)244-0266 (OGVM0 l,U/ti �, Qq. Pg �b FIti 91 r7 p-14 11:15�'.. (4)6' 6 5 ro'z8 P3 s �'► C��,s,� = 'I� 3 f t �-lt�C,6'•`-r : 2 ^��`l� 1,l;:`T'7 I - � 11 Y. f� 2 IL 16720 9 � 1 xPi►��.s� Fie •� -I'M RiPPEY by .-DATF CNK!r DATE__ VO NO Portland,Oeegon 97219 _ Phone(503)244-0266 —_ - Fool 10 A - 0 C LL) kLeA F�x��� r ,I 1 2,35X ql r JLIt ? �`.j�G�'. r✓ �: )��'1_v 2 J 7C)2. f4.2 X �p � �+-1(n. : `•�1��2-�r2�)� t= ?��=�� -�� '('�.Vi �+,I,�a.l� rClrt{, w J6720 c� t P 2 tig C� 9�pN TuaN�P� E pm S: TM RIPPEY CONSI'LING F11GINMA v� � ` � - - - - - _ CHK W?_--__DATf JOA t10 9221 S.W.BAI-bllr Bl.•d.,Suite 105 ----- _..---..--- -- Portland,Oregon 97219 --- !HlEf„ �•--� Phone(503)244-0266 _--- i�10 Rib'! •� �+►�+ ln�t7 PAIN 4---AN i r i O 3 � PA IL 4 � �, •f• 1 N M w1p. r Z IL � 9 t 4,I1N, lot � �'` _ s a 4—410 CD (ti to v r .t wYa Qrj n •: h f OIL r ' S S , �A T w i � � 1 1 .;3 {1 0 � o n `- a Q� el�d vss ems-- f � •iyti 0 T "r v yam. 7 ' Q a? j f y o n qE� � S '1 y ID h • %All l .C' r V r J` two litres 11-13" from each edge of the PERMAPLY • Deck joints must be sealed to prevent bitumen roofing felt. A second ply of PERMAPLY roofing felt is drippage. to be installed (insuring side laps are offset minimum - Wet fastener plates may result in blister. of 12 to first ply) in a solid, uniform 23-45 Ib/100 ft mopping of hot asphalt. Roof insulation must be set ,Zt�Deckon oof in a solid, uniform 25-30 Ib/100 ft' mopping of Trot In lation shall be laid with edges parallel to flut s asphalt. bear on deck surface and single layer shall t 4.4 Concrete Deck Vapor Retarder: (Poured In Place, termH unsupported over the channel. Do, le layer Precast Concrete). Prime the deck with asphalt primer flute spar. ' that of same single layer thic ass. (i.e. applied at a rate of %-1'/4 gal/100 ft' and allow to dry. 2 layers of Mutual app► is same as 1ri tequilas total mechan' al fastening thickness. actory Embed two plies of PERMAPLY to the primed deck, , shingle fashion (starter sheets required), lapping 19" of single or boc� layer to steel de s. into uniform, solid moppings of hot bitumen using For UL construction, . tura ins ation to deck surface 23-45 Ib/100 ft2 per ply. Roof insulation must be by embedding ;n a mop 'ng o of asphalt applied to set in a solid, uniform 25-30 Ib/100 ft' mopping of bearing s:irfacc at the rat 12-15 Ib/100 ft?Secure- hot asphalt. ment of insu;z lion to steel ka may be accomplished 4.5 Other Listed FM & UL Classified Vapor Retarders: by using mechanical fa ners the sole means of securement. Such fas 11r she a in accordance Where these systems, approved with FIBERGLAS Roof with the producer's acommendati s, codes, and/or Insulation are desired, modification of the specifications insurance require ants, and shall be ceptable to the to include such systems are permitted when dpplicd in membrane prod ter. FIBERGLAS roof i sulation shall accordance with the selected producers' recommenda- be attached t steel decks using GLASFA T fasteners tions,codes and/or fire insurance requirements. A good, in accordant -with Owens-Corning's recom endations, integral vapor reta-der protects the roof insulation and codes or i urance requirements. Refer to ac ptable roofing membrane from moisture from the interior of Mechan' al Fasteners in this guide on Pages 1 & 23. • the structure. _ R I C1 I 0 ROOF NO : Factory Mutual Class I and Underwriters\ 5.0 Insulation Application Procedures L oratory, Inc. requirements must be compiled with 5.1 General: The application of ,00f insulation and hen directed. memorane roofing shall not he started until after all -6-4Weed Deek Reef insulation AppliaTo app q other trades have completed work which will require r f insulation to a wood deck, a dry sheet must st them and their equipment to traverse the deck. be rXiled to the wood decking. Mechanically s re Membrane roofing shall not be applied over wet one pl f PERMAPLY lapped 2 inches (min.X) at insulation. side laps id end laps, to the deck using ge head • Insulation shall be laid in courses parallel to edges (1°�°inch mi um diameter) Simpler Is. Nailing with t'ie mopping surface on top. (See 5.8) should hP max um 9 inches o.c. a ide laps and stagger nailed ma 'mum 18 inch o.c. on two lines • End joints of each course shall be staggered with 11-13 inches from ea edge o the base ply. adjoining courses, except where roof tape is speci- fied. When using roof tape, the joints of the top layer The Senco Fastening Sys is acceptable in lieu of must be continuous in both directions. Simpler' naris for sec ng t base ply of PERMAPLY • Offset multiple layer joints a minimum of 6 inches. to the wood deck. t achment attern shall be in accordance with a producer's r ommendations • Edges of insulation boards shall be mitered at ridges and/or the ins nce/code requirem ts. and elsewhere to prevent open joints or irregular surlaces. Edges shall be butted to provide moderate Roof insul ion shall then be appd to a nailed contact, but not. deformed. If Kraft mopping surface PFRMAPL by embedment in 25,10 Ib/10 ft2 of hot is damaged in process replace with a patch of a aspha . Asphalt must be hot enough at the ' e base ply set in flashing cement. app' ation to attain positive seL gement. "Wa 'ng in" • Roof insulation must be adhered to deck using of a individual insulation boaras is recommende to required adhesive and!or mechanical fasteners. nsure maximum adhesive contact. • Vapor retarders and insulation shall not be installed • devices. y to bridge auross expansion 1oints or other sim * iliar cation: FIBEPGLAS roof insulation may be atpptt directly to wood decks using Glasfast fastener system 12 or other fasteners (see page-, 19 & 23) in accordance it' with supplier's recommendations, codes or insurance MUM avid Gypsain Doek Real requirements. When roof insulation is mechanically One ply of PERMAPLY should be mechanically attached to the deck, the use of a base ply is not fastened to the deck surface with fasteners recom- necessary. mended by the deck producer. Side lapE and end laps should be 2 inches ;min. 1"). Nailing should be max- 5.4 Poured-in-Place Structural Concrete Deck or imum 9 inches o.c. on side laps, and stagger nailed Prestressed/Precast Concrete Deck Roof Insulation maximum 18 inches o.c. o:� two lines 11-13 inches IApplication: Dry deck surface must be primed with from each edge of the base ply. Insulation should be asphalt primer at the rate of %-1'/4 gal/100 ft' of deck secured to the base ply in moppings of hot asphalt, area, and allowed to dry. Deck joints must be grouted 2 5-30 Ib/100 ft' of deck area. Asphalt must be hot or taped to prevent bitumen drippage, or primer and enough at the time of insulation application to attain asphalt must be kept a distance of 3-4 inches from positive securement. "Walking in" of individual insula- deck joints. Insulated-type roof vents may be consid- tion boards is recommended to ensure maximum ered to allow release of vapor from the insulation adhesive contact. "sandwich" FIBERGLAS Roof Insulation may he adhered to the Gypew" Book-flee• - dry, primed deck as follows: ApplieaNem-Leveled dry surface must be primed with asphalt primer at a rate of %-1'/, gal/100 ft'and allowed 6.4.1 Asphalt: Embed in uniform, solid mopping using to dry. Roof insulation shall be set in a minimum solid 20 to 35 Ib/100 ft? 30 Ib/100 ft' mopping of hot asphalt. 5.4.2 Perm..:,top: Embed in uniform, solid mopping New wet fill decks and lightweight concrete must be using 20 to 35 Ib/100 ft? vented using preformed slotted deck. • 5.4.3 Permstop Adhesive: Embed in %" wide ribbons, 5.8 Roof Insulation Application Diagrams 6" on center using 0.7 gal/100 ft? Right Way 5.4.4 R907T Adhesive: Embed in %" wide ribbons, Applicadon & Flute Direction 6" on center using 9.7 gal/100 ft? (36" or 48"t'/,"=No Problem) 5.4.5 TREMprime Adhosive: Embed in %" wide i „_ I , ,R I �_ APPLICAl1O/16 ribbons, 12" on center or full mopping using 3 gall 100 ft? Minimum 1 Ae" FIBERGLAS Roof Insulation. !) FIBERGLAS Roof Insulation may be attached using •—� �--� �—+ �--► H r--i .--. �-. GLASFAST/STRIKER fastening system or other " fasteners-see pages 21 & 23 in accordance with suppliers recommendations, codes and/or insurance requirements. _J b 6�'sHtieral�A/aed FlbacQacJc 4 k) Wrong Way Dark areas represent the Reref+%suleilan Avr fr ellen-One ply of PERMAPLY potential problems areas--this should be mechanically secured to the deck surface is an exaggerated example, but with fasteners recommended by the deck producer. illustrates the implication of Side laps and end laps should he 2 inches (min. 1"). laying in this manner. Fastening should be maximurn 9 inches o.c. on side laps, and stagger nailed rnaximum 18 inches o.c. on Application & Flute Direction lines 11-13 inrrhes frorn each edge of the base ply. (36" or 48"�:;z"-Problem) Insulation shall be secured to the base ply in moppings of hot asphalt, 25-30 Ib/100 ft?Asphalt must he hot APP nIICAtolnrrION6 — uTe noH enough at the time of insulation application to attain __ ._-__. positive securement. "Walking in" of individual insula- tion nsula I I IF"„ " tion boards is recommended to ensure maximum R4 adhesive co,itsct. b 13 5.9 Re-of Tape (When Specified): Shall be laid evenly, 5.11.5 Roof insulation stops and wood nailers shall be smoothly, and embedded in a uniform coating of hot installed as required in flashing details. ' asphalt applied at a rate of not !ess than 15 Ib/100 ft' of tape. Care is to be taken to assure smooth applica- 5.11.6 Prime with asphalt primer at a rate of '/,-1% tion of tape, and that the tape is in full contact with gal/100 ft' and allow to dry. the asphalt. On hand mop applications the asphalt should extend a minimum of Y, inch beyond both sides 5.11./ Embed roof insulation, into hot steep asphalt of the tape. Application of the roof tape mai- be made applied at the minimum rate of 50 Ib/100 ft'of roof by either mopping the insulation joint and rolling and surface. If the old sc ' ice (min. 10 yrs.) is coal tar pressing the tape into place, or by use of a taping pitch, the latter may be used in lieu of asphalt. Addi- machine (smt,dr felt layer) which will apply asphalt tional bitumen should be used, if needed,to adequately and tape in a continuous operation. adhere t) old gravel surfaces or mechanically attF ' if deck permits in accordance with insurance and/or 5.10 Multiple Layers: Where more than one layer code requirements. of insulation is indicated on the drawings or speci- fications, the top Surface of the previous layer shall 5.12 Roof Vent Application—When Required: Recover be coated with 25-30 Ib/100 ft' of hot asphalt for or multiple layer with FIBERGLAS roof insulation. embedment of the next layer of roof insulation. Approved mechanical fastener can be used in lieu Due to the proprietary features of FIBERGLAS Roof of asphalt. Successive layers of insulation shall be Insulation, it is the only roof insulation that can be applied so that joints are offset a 6 inch minimum effectively vented. To instell the vent properly, cut the with the preceding layer. roof membrane and remove a section approximately Y." smaller than the opening area of the vent. Remove When using accepted insulations of other producers, top insulation layers down to the bottom board secured consult that Producer for recommendations. on the deck. Remove the existing membrana and/or the FIBERGLAS roof insulation cover on the bottom-most 5.11 Recover Insulation Application: Roof recover may insulation layer. Flash in vent using 3 plies feathered in be a satisfactory and economical solution to major roof using flashing cement. Install counter flashings or cap. problems, but the decision to recover should be made only after careful consideration and analysis of existing All vents shall have a minimum 4" flange, primed and conditions, structural considerations for added weight, dried, for attachment of the flashing stripping materia). codes and insurance requirements. 6.0 Protection When the analysis has been completed and a decision to recover is made, the following procedures should be 6.1 General: Installed insulation shall not be left followed: exposed to the weather. It shall be covered and water proofed at once. All e,.,iosed edges left at the end of 5.11.1 If old gravel roof, scrape or spud clean until the day's work shall be temporarily sealed by lapping a smooth surface has been obtained; or loose gravel roofing material or an extra strip of roofing over the can be removed and uneven spots leveled using asphalt exposed edges of the insulation, and mopping it in and gravel. All surfaces shall have dust, dirt, or debris place. Remove when work resumes. Installed insulation. swept and removed, which has become wet shall be removed and replaced with dry material unless it can be dried out. Applied 5.11.2 Wherever wet or otherwise deteriorated roof insulation and completed roofing shall be protected insulation is found or suspected, q shall be removed at all times againc! damage by roof traffic. Plywood or and replaced with new material. other means should be used to prevent construction darnage and walkways where permanent traffic will 5.11.3 All cuts, tears, splits, blisters, buckles, wrinkles, ocCUr. fishmouths, or otherwise deteriorated roofing shall be removed and patched to provide a level surface. 6.2 Water Cut-Off (If Specified) x.11.4 All old flashing shall he cut out and stripped 6.2.1 Wate-cut-offs shall be installed one board from walls, curbs, and objects which shall then be width, and not more than 48" from all walls, parapets, cleaned, repaired or otherwise conditioned to conform curbs, and other objects to be flashed, and throughout with the requirements for new construction. the remainder of the roof by dividing it into areas of g00 ft' -)r as otherwise specified. 14 Application of FIBERGLAS Roof Insulation �/ Non-Nallable DocksOC-X1 All Areas General This specification is for use over non-nallable type decks,I.e. structural poured-in-place or precast concrete. These decks must Non-Nailable be dry,clean,firm and relatively smooth to accept roof insulation. Deck Application " Concrete Primer: concrete decks req,dre asphalt primer applied at the rate of %-11 A gal/100 ft'of deck area. Vapor Retarder Of required): Apply two plies of PERMAPIY roofing felt to the primed deck with a hot asphalt at a rate of 23-45 Ib/100 ft'per ply. Side laps and and Wreoped laps shall be solidly sealed with hit asphalt. Edge Insulation: Embed roof insulation In uniform, solid 20.35 Ib/100 ft'mopping of hot asphalt.Asphalt must be not enough at the time of Insulation 0 9 ; application to attain positive securement."Walking-in"of individual Z insulation boards Is recommended to ensure maximum adhesive contact. Roof insulation and joints must be staggered and the top layer joints offset from the joints of the bottom layer, a minimum of 4 6Inches. " For double-layer insulation applications,the tcp surface of the first layer of insulation shall be uniformly coated with hot asphalt using 25-30 Ib/100 ft'of curface, and successive layers of Insulation shall be applied so joints are offset a minimum of 6 Inches both Materials (per 100 +t' of roof area) ways from proceeding layers. Insulation shall not be left exposed I. Bitumen Attachment to the weather. No more insulation shall be applied than can be completely covered with required membrane specification on the Concrete Primer: 1 gel same day. Membrane/Vopor Retarder: Neilers: Vapor Retarder: PERMAPU 1 ply Treated wood nailers are required on incline exceeding 2 inches per (if required) foot to help secure insulation and roof membranes to non-nallable Insulations: decks or to decks with insulation. Nailers should be the same FIBERGLAS Roof Insulation thickness as the insulation end should be installed perpendicular Bitumen: -the slope on 8 ft, face-to-face for slopes up to 3 inches per foot Slope Type anI 4 ft. face-to-face for slopes greater thar.3 inches per foot. up to /," it or III over 1Y III or IV 0"-6" PERMAMOP II. Mechanical Attachment Option GLASFAST/STRIKER fastening system Is recommended for siigl- layer and top layer of multi layer applications of structural concrete. Insulation: FIBEf'GLAS Roof Insulation Mechanical Attachment: FM 1-60 • '1-90 (See FIBERGLAS Roof Insulation Product Reference and Applica- tion Guide--Mochanical Fastening Table for Structural Concrete Decks.) 18 } EG� LASFAST/STRIKER Fastening Systemmmmmmmmm� Application Instructions FOR FASTENING ROOF INSULATION TO A minimum of 1" emoedment in concrete is required. STRUCTURAL CONCRETE ROOF DECKS Carbide-tipped masonry drill bits used in a standard rotary hammer provide close tolerance and maximum The GLASFAST/STRIKER fastening system is for use mechanical fastening strength. with FIBEP3LAS roof insulation, foam roof insulation Owens-Corning assumes no responsibility or liability and other accepted roof insulations. for deck, fastener attachrrcnt or for fastener pullout GLASFAST/STRIKER fasteners are fr- use through resistance. single layer, bottom layer, or both la•,ers of a double layer application. Anchor must be seated to pull The joints should be staggered and the top layer joints plate snug and flush. -- offset from the joints of the bottom layer, a minimum of 6 inches. A Striker Punch Part No. 839400 is available to seat ` the anchor in the GLASFAST plate. i GLASFAST/STRIKER Selection Size Anchor length and minimum/maximum thickness of `�. ' • ^ " insulation. • CORRECT '. ' - GLASFAST/STRIKER Selector Guide ' Anchor Insulation Drill Bit Length' Thickness* ANSI Size' 2" 1/" to 1" 3" 11/:" to 2" I 3'/:" k to 214" — Anchw must not be over- 4" ,21/:" to 3" driven, causing plate to cup. 41/:" 3" to 31h" '/,e"x 914" A/ 5" 314" to 4" •[angth may need to be longer for recover systems for existing roof inauletinn andlor memhrena. n] - Recommendations for Fast and Easy Installation of GLASFAST/STRIKER " •: •' Drill pilo! hole 2 With a hole ., • through insula- a minimum of tion into concrete. /4" deeper than INCOMr;&:'CT• - A standard rotary engagement -- hammer drill is depth, position recommended. plate and drive anchor into pre-drilled hole with harnmer and Anchor not properly seated punch. Seat head may puncture membrane. within plate using hammer and —�\ Striker Punch. 1 Striker is it registered trademark of Illinois Tool Works Inc GLASFAST/STRIKER Pullout Resistance—Lbs. Depth of Fmbedmanl it Solid Material(Inch"s) 13000^SI,rnr"d 400y.l I ^ 2' 1940 �1 ---- - -- -- 1500 - - �• •„ INCORRECT 1 1100 - LBS. 1000 1200 1400 1600 1600 2000 ------ Tested under Ideal laboratory conditions. Owens Corning assumes no responsibility or liability for desk,fastener attachment,or for fastener pullout res.•tsnce. 21 Fastening Patterns For Roof Insulation— Consult FM Approval Guide for Owens-Corning assumes no responsi- bility or liability for design or application Membraiie System Approvals to specification.Ins,rrance or code requirements. 9e 4a a9_ Table 1 O's Y-1 3 fasteners/3'x4' I _ 4 fasteners/4'x4' 12' 12' 12- 8 fasteners/4'x 8' "' "' (X) 49' 24• 49• 24• 49• 11 1 .1 1 12• 1 2• 12' B' IE' ,2• ,]• i • 2• 11 12• 71: 17• ,2• ,7'_� Table 2 , • �i 4 fasteners/3'x4.' F fasteners/4'x4' 17' 12' 12• 10 fasteners/4'x8' '"' (i' 'x' ``' j'� ,2 I 12• 24• 49• Axl t 49• - 4e• 7� 12' 17' 39" ++ 49' Table 3 9''9• 9' b' I2• 17' 12' 24• 24• 5 fasteners/3'x4' 6 fasteners/4'x4' 12' 12 12- 12 fasteners/4'x8' !X O on C �^ ) O ,- 12. V 49' 24• 49• - (-X) 0 Q -49• 12 7' T I © © o IY 1 ,2' 1 1i•t 1 J0' 49' a9' Table 4 9' 9' B' B' 9' 12' ?' 18,1v 6 fasteners/3'x4' 8 fasterersi4'x4' �= x, ��� ° 12- , rx; .5 fasteners/4'x8' •2• 12• I 12. (_r) 4a' 41' J, :x) 1]' 11• 12' c., (r) �;, __ r.1 x, (x) rx) 12. 12- 29• ., 49' 1 Tabun 5 9 9' D' 9 1' 2' 7' i' rl ' 24' r, fas•;ners/3'x4' �1 10 fasteners/4'x 4' n °• (J G on ' CG n C) ° 16 fasteners/4'x V' 9 S0 2' O Q 2 p� N N (Nj (y 49• ,?• 49' 17• 49' 112 2 _ es• Table 6 a' Y 1' 9a• �2• ,2• 17. 2• ,2 ,e• 1h• la• l9• _ 12• 9 fasteners/3'x4' �- -�' —4e` ' _ :-T 12 fasteners/4'x4' 7 © ® ' ( ® ® O ° © n @ © ° 20 fasteners/4'x 8' I9• © ® O ,9. ® © 0) � n ® � ON 22 Revision to page 23: Fiberglas' Roof hisulation Product Owens-Corning assumes no respo sl- Reference and Application Guide bility or liability for design or application to sper;rication,Insurance or code Pub. No. '13120-1 March 1993 equi(ements. -Metghanical Fastening Tables Mechanic stening Systems for Steel and Treated Wood Decks' Conwlt Factory Mutual Approved Guide/or Membnn rum Approvals. Single-Layer andTop Layer of Multi-Layer Systems/Factory Mutual Uplift Resistance Rating/Ower orning Accepted STEEL DECKS WOOD DECKS GLASFAST FASTENING SYSTEI111 FIBERGLAS ROOF INSULATION J01!.8 1ERGLAS ROOF INSULATION 3'x4' 4'x 4' 4'x 8' 4' 4'x 4' 4'x 8' 1.70 1.90 1-60 1-90 1.60 1-90 90 1-60 1-90 1-60 1-90 GLASFAST/HEXTRA SYSTEM—Min. %*FIBEP.G roof insulation 3 4 4 6 B 3 4 4 6 8 10 GLASFAST/HEXTR.A SYSTEM—Min.2'/."FIBLRGLA f insulation 3 3 1' 4 6• a 3 3 3' 4 6• 0 Mechanical Fastening Systems for Steel ar,d Treated Decks' suit Factory Mutual Approval Guide for Membrane System Approwlr. Bottom Layer of Multi-Layer Systems/Factory Mutual U ft R stance Rating/Owens-Corning Accepted EEL DECKS WOOD DECKS F RGLA OF INSULATION FIBERGLAS ROOF INSULATION x 4' 4' 4'x 8' 3'x 4' 4'x 4' 4'x 8' 80 1.90 1-60 1, 1-80 1-90 1.60 1.90 1-60 1.90 1.60 1-90 GLASFAST/HEXTRA SYSTEM—Min. ZA ,'l 3 4 4 5 10 3 4 4 5 8 10 GLASFAST/HEXTRA SYSTgM—Min, 2 n 3 3 3' 4 6• 8 3 3 3' 4 6- 8 Construction Fastener Dekfast P '1 6 6 8 11 1 4 6 6 8 11 16 Construction Fastener Oekfall4 G 6 8 1 1 16 4 6 8 8 11 16 Tru-Fest Scraw&Metal Place4 6 6 8 11 16 4 6 6 8 11 16 Fahco Type R Screw&Plate4 6 6 0 1 1 1 G A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Fabco Insulfixx S/HD Insulfixx S Screw4 6 6 8 11 16 N/ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8uildex Roofgrip Screw 4 6 6 8 11 16 NIA /A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tru-Fast Screw&Metni Pate 4 6 6 8 1 1 1 G N/A N N/A N/A N/A N/A Tru-Fast Screw&Plastic Pla 4 6 8 8 11 1 G N/A N/A A N/A N/A N/A GAF Goftite Screw&Pie 4 6 6 8 1 1 16 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A BUildex Poor Grip N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A 4 6 8 j1' 11 16 (� Insulfixx/HD Insu x S N/A NIA N/A NIA N/A N/A 4 6 6 1 1 16 f 'Consult F Approval Guide or Supplements for Approved Systems.1-60 corners require 60%more than body of roof.1-90 corners and petimeters quire b')% to thrn body of roof.Corner-where parapets are lose than 3'high equlrs 100%more for 1-90.Sea Loss Prevention Data 1-28. N/A of approved 5POI6 fior nr contractor Is responsible for design and application to specification,insurance and/or code requirements. Structural t Consult Fetory Mutual Approval Guide for Membrane System Approvals. Mechanical Fastening Systems for structural Concrete Deck.,;' a�_r � __ Single-Layer and Top Layer of Multi.-Layer°ystems!Factory Mutual Uplift Resistance Rating/Owens-Corning Accepted STRUCTURAL CONCRETE DECKS GLASFAST FAGTENIN(l SYSTEM FIBERGLAS ROOF INSULATION Tx 4' 4'x 4' d'x 8' 1-60 1 9 0 1-60 1.9 0 180 1-90 GLASFAST/STOKER and PLATE SYSTEM—Min. 1'.'FIBERGLAS roof insulation 3 4 4 i 5 8 10 GLASFAST/STRIKrh nd PLATE SYSTEM—Min.2V FIBFRGLAS roof iosulatlon 3 3 3• 4 6 8 Mechanical Fes-,ening Systems for Structural Concrete Decks' Conwlt Factory Mutual Approval Guide for Membrana System Approvals. Bottom Laysr of Multi-Layer Systems/Factory Mutual Uplift Resistance Rating/Owens-Corning Accepted STRUCTURAL CONCRETE DECKS FIBERGLAS ROOF INSULATION 3'x4' _ I 4'x4' 4'x8' I.60 I-9v I__1 60 L90 �-60 1-90 GLASFAST/STRIKER and PLATE SYSTEM—Min. 'L"FIBERGLAS roof insulation 3 4 --ii 4 5 8 10 GLASFAST/STRIKER and PLATE SYSTEM—Min.2%'FIBERGLAS roof Insulation 3 3 I 7• 4 6' 8 Buildex Striker Metal Plate 4 6 G 8 11 16 Construction Fastener Dekf at 4 6 F, 8 11 16 141#'15 Deklast Heavy Steel or Plastic Plate 4 6 f, 8 11 16 Fabco Con FI-(x/HD Insulfixx S 4 ti G 8 11 16 GAF Gaftite 11 Steel or Plastic Plate 4 6 C. 8 11 16 Tapcon and Metal Plat,: 4 6 6 8 11 16 Tru-Fast Screw&Me:81 Plate or Plastic Plate 4 6 6 8 1 1 16 Consult FM Approval Guido or Supplements for Approved Systems.1 60 corners require 50%mrre than body of roof.I-90 carriers and perimeters require 50%more then body of roof.Corners whey s parapets are lose than 3'high require 100%more or 1-90.Sae Loss Prevention Date 1 28. NIA-not approved Specifier or contractor is responsible for design and application to specificatlon,insurance andror code requirements. „ —� --- 'REVISED MAY, 1993 Z23 "CT!rt e• . .:..,,. e-+,�z ..,- tatrec- :-: ""-•^-r�r ..y.r.-,rtirar +W.,....,.. HAI�rGELEGEND • A .+UNOOK _ 8 COACH SCREW ROD / C" LAMP I IN, :�\ �� _ _-- TOP BEAM CLAMP o� EYE ROD —�-7 F FLUSH SHE G CEILING FLANGE 1 \ - / , , g H SIDE BEAM BRACKET a / / STD. LONGTYFiITiJDI`iAL. "J" BOLT K SHORT CLIP ulr,-TFC- F+ � I►JFw \ / L "L•' ROD I cl4- Psi 5,T'�"r1� \ k \ M MACHINE THREADED R00 I'�3R c.lPr) fRt%.i o � + Ill �.er--Tlc�! \ � � � ��% � N TOGGLE NUT \ 1 ~`\ P POWDER DRIVEN STU 4.��-�v I -1� �..J cam..-cam ra + _T� � f�,, i � WEDGE ANCHOR c T -� U STD._'7R,'NSVFvSF ��• ? WAY EA` 1H/XJAKE BRACE 2 1r N 4 WAY EARTH WA KE BRACE �G \ \ ST,IUCTURE TO CENTER A \ p *rr aJ \•• s m P' ` ATG._ =Ol Ida,v INE OF I'FE IN INCHES a c. y SPRINKLER LEGEND ti G I SPRINKLER ~ ORIFICE SIZES o D-T[D � TW L•j ANO TYPE ' � pE c \`�. ` riaTz..i�r-�`+ 70 � ''i'G?�,Iuc 01s x4i SMAY e4 16 8 16 j Evl 1aIi1 I �E.�ISTI.x, 3 Ma • ' �1�ILDIrJGI ��!' 3 1 1 SIDEWALL JPI t-1 { E,,,��e,�.l,� ^DDITIa;J /• \ r DI u A \ �r\" 1 6 16 2 dv-KI`r 4. S"O"AJ1 DRY TYPE r `` ,o r 1 ,�,•I1 � TEMP RATING WAO O 16S' ; Id /�� [ a in• / TSO Yp 112 1 5 \4I }a ?B6' Z 1 112 - }—__ l'� Li •' 2 OF 3NO' of 14Y�4t_z R .. 500• 1i? 1iz �'` SPRIN:%LERS USED \ YrY QW1M T[MI ' 6 O FYI O `,Ir" Bell ILL 3.121. A _ � t Q kt�;w i � BiLZ Icy S 10 D 0 c D 2 tab / \ Ri•'Sc.� G S DA- rJ ZZ It E) Ae 14, 0�\ r07 / D �` IL i, ,, R , a to /�, , \ 10 "'rte TOTAL 4-c o 4 %K ° \L a ' �� FITTING LEGEND APPROVALS REOUIRED `C/ [ 9 ,t V O r P PIPE OLET r,r Z L g SN SHAPED wjKF , .aZ. > -- - _- �� 7 114 __._.___.-_..__..___..__ T'P *� DISTRIBUTION •r •� � ��" � ''. `'• � _ . - _- . .—_ _ ._____!`'`9._•____._.__.__. _____...._..._.__I�'�°!. .. - _-. ___.._.._....._._.___----___-•---_—__-_._4v_.. o — ,- [ , 1 1 15-1 D, I I ---- -- -. �F ---- �; C E G' vF-L _ DUALITY CONTROL BY DATE / n o APPROVED FOR f ABRICAT!ON BY DATE GENERAL NOTES ALL MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT TO BE NEW AND UNDERWRITERS APPROVED 2 PIPING DIMENSIONS ARE CENTER TO CENTER EXCEPT RISER-4 DIMENSIONS SHOWN 1. `'\ \. ' �••�+..,..__ THUSLY(1 6)WHICH ARE END TO END - 1 EARTHQUAKE BRACING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH .�-•�.I'i"_-a�••�•� , . "�. AEI .............................. . NFPA PAMPHLET NO 13. APPLICABLE EDITION p~•'" "-1 Q p" v �` `�� COndttlonatly A �roj ....••• ""• ......••........ 4 PIPE HANGERS AND METHOD OF HANGING TO BE IN..CCORDANCE WITH the �arOrk � •••••••••, NFPA PAMPHLET NO 13 APPLICABLE EDITION �'1(_Rk�!T. d�srri t�. ��•� • ` �' 5 PIPING SHALL BE IN�GCORDANCE WITH NFPA PAMPHLET NO 1.3. APPLICABLE EDITION D ` \\., \ Seg Icr+��to F611,7,rv.�4..°�'�._Jo��_---- t 6 JOINING Of: PIPE ANO FITTINGS, THREADED AND WELDED,SHALL.BE IN ACCORDANCE 1 \ n WITI I NFPA ?AMPHLET NO 13•APPLICABLE EDITION ............................................................................[ l• \ Attaoh y, 1 OWNER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE HEAT TO PREVENT WATER IN PIPES FROM rRFF71NG IN f 1: AREAS PROTECTED BY A WFT PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTEM a / �•�` $ �`•,` ---) 'V CD�a��1v�\ 8 Al L WIRING OF ELECTRICAL DEVICES(IF REQUIRED)TC 7 BE PROV DED 9 PB'AINTIp OF PIS 0 EQUIPMENT(IF REQUIRED)TO BE PROVIDED n `�� / �, •� 10 FURRING OF PIPE AND EQUIPMENT(IF REQUIRED)TO BE PROVIDED Q By DESIGN CRITERIA AND PIPE NOTES • z. tC arc, or uJ( - '. C 1-l•W D E+c I I,'f I�k, `,,01W -To cx1v M e>4STEt1 Dr-SI(ML1E1� ?o �D SRP I . !5%f�'1 15or> f� •-- - -- I �, • \ }� A�.l.• cl r_'E-a P I F L Tu !3E tbI....-1 E_o �-x.1►�Eili t n � e + \ u` �� a.l a•l ,7 u:,c--'L ���_ - _ 4 6c0it- CE,�.rc - _ �. G+-�- '�c,h�E vJ E,p P I h� `I v rf✓ P+.►.3 E.t? 'x 1� 4 R - �� � ?A.,�� REVISIONS J 0 S JKLF;I� MK DATE By n 0 Al CONTRACT WITH r T lr 4+ f� r j/ \\ 1 -T J� �.�.�.�...� 1 ': p` + 1, 1 DR-"`1 7'C4 ���TI�K- I ILD �1 FWD \� I DIE-1 24 VF f>1 S C-+_�►[-k.t►�!vx, n IL A'101 i slc a.l- s�'��1r-1 � !y-r+ IT d d 0 `~ o ° `�7•h OL 0 MN IPTG CONTRACT NAME Z _— J � U' _ I mill Is �' '7 � 4• � � �, � __-•---_ `1`--�-� __-__ --_.—..___---.___._-_- _—___.— 1 I � ,�tf� `�I�f VA--•r E. Caa'c-+!.►-1m t 5���� �r°► Y� G�I.a., � \ / '� Tip 17 ,p �fio � 1 Iit�€-1111 ATHI � Fl TFCTinfV (01 10380 SW Cascade Blvd. 7—' I��" 1 �IWI�.GL.N�-R VJM 1 of 5 DESIGNER DA SH ET JOB NO. t,1F 1 t)A,41 F If I INF RIneT .,,. •,,:.:. i "-:,:�- 7,7F"!G' n r!•..ar,rq .,nF,i•R*'�s7CP..r+.)��sq .aP�,var'�,Xvry�.•.ak'. 08/20/96 IIIII1111111111 Illll1111111I i 111ITI !1!li ! !111!ll Il�l�l I!1 �!1i�! �!IIII ! il!1!1!�Il!li ► !lIl!II�IIiI!1► II�Ii!lI1!lll!lI !1!1!jI�!1!lIl INCH I MADE IN CHINA _ nsiiiliililiililllii 111IIllliiilnllllllllillllll�illilllllllliilt�iillllillliililllliiil!llilillilillliliilliiiiilllli!illililii!'rl!ii��iiiilliiiii►iiliniiiiiiliiilli�iilnii Iii�lillililiillllilnllll111iIn111iIlllllllinilliiilnnliliililnliinllni!linliillm . HORRTSON BUILDING CORP TEL :503-653-019_8 Oct. 24 '94 13 : 08 No . 006 P ,On AORRISON_ BUILDING CORP TEL :503-•653-0198 Oct 24 '94 13 :09 No .006 P .03 MORRISON BUILDING CORP TEL :503-653-0198 Cct 24 '94 13 : 10 No .006 P .OQ '' ^fin � '�\ � .`\ � } ;F�j� ; MY�£+ '_"*-mow'---- j•., � h�� -..! .._ � . IT- •r. �iT!� 4k.;..�lil4' :,t'`ti7lr y _ � �\`\\ \\\ \ \ t •� r v•�i•��pit'�,;'t;�+ a..}.' � ,+'""C'�'s '+..*.t�r� �,.t� `tea, •jlt� .ar "'•`Yt y, t ► \\ \ \ ~" `x =' NI - - . f `''+ �.trf K.i 'tt'-'...!.• :•:.. .t ♦Stiti.r• ' ( r \ \\ \' '..tt y+�i��� r, t� t -', � r►t 9F•.,,�� M,/• ' ".l,+�wl• ) r4 ... '-. � �' c.� ' l..�A�i i�'' t +{. .'„rte.tt,• , 1 IT �, t ,s}1 'f =S ( :%} �\\ �` \,� \\ Wr+,•s�.+yS s f `' r •y •S r .��r,..r.�C�[�.,,' t �. �'L 7w�r�.5 �r.�I JI I•'� (• �F''•a - _. /Z 1C:fp d3� rySy�.,},,•t L• R ' �r#'-%'' '. /�' �t►�lh \ `\ - ''�`''.t',t'J. . •+� �'',' •s 4i° _C,°'i' �� 'r.+ / �`� tr� CA• E1�i[Q t.���, •.+; � xr/�.1 3. �� �'K �.�' ►�;^.�j�ris-: t�'•,, a t� e,' -., �.� t; ?w ', ��'r [•'-x� Q w �\ ,\ � i ,fit�.f r/ �•.• •...�r �•t_. 7 �y�,��, •�1.�': N" v \��\ `}� i .. ^' rr rs_.. f _ -4j`.. /^��,�� \�\` \\ `//.r ti t� f% / S�tV�r alt�/ eZ. O�I. ..••"y, e• • ..+�f��r��i `� •'`� ���..�' .aL �` �. / ,cW'�i••+�S „l: f 1t y�.. .t 7M Y,.� 4r�� r _ Cr►k�(24 BL Z°Pr.lt I�r.� u a � Y.+r:�„' � �„y y�R.j rr ,.� , r: � 1• / .�\} �! :\ �.•,Yr,J'^��t''- r :rt5�'�y� s• ��rr{Y���� � a � p 1Rt.u.i '�Ity h :�. ' �1 _ ����..•i � ` "'! \ t•'•r t:f•t��rt • ..p � •fir Ltei"`R ( `. �r � t. � a;� . . .fix•� y t�:y✓ � Gb'R�.�Y.:{ � -i i --•��-.-_�`� �, ^I,` `�•'s'���'�"u� Jr t A'•.. ..•;•!!.�i; C..i7 r t 7►•r-r � �t ��pp r'rr'� .)$ 1.i.+y.iv •�r•Ms t _� ''t.t r A'. i..•`3 ..;�C :'yl.:• � kL1' .. ��G� ,may t + �>< �J,rt+ r '/ '� .�'r .:t.'•?^f at. t'i. r �: � ,.. ,..'�:�:ii•' � e��' �."":• �JfA � . . G r `y7�J.'•: i• ! �l'7`,:tb-• i Yti.�' �'�'^�„ _ � � r •(...� .� ,44S, �'..'; .`\ f/ - E �'�r tr{.,���' ,f � ,,•�t! ,b .'t,- w _ } ;. ?IRri Fti. y .. - - - - - i t j.�•.y.. �l-t � '' �. �� :�tV C"�„ r� '' •r•' .F � , t�j+'•�t,' l 4.•. � - _ � �•7 . n 4� Ir[�., i 1, ..�,::T ,dM )�I Y ' •�f.tr' ;r` t (� •� �! i t'��` `�.;��J, '� �4':� 1''4xt�S.5 y y ' •,j�".•'';.'�•.'" tk� y.,_ � �' �� ;7"1}'y•yy't;y;�'4; } .._.: f +j`•`� i•1.�t`y • J�I � � R�[ C -� T ,+,.�t ; ��il'r ''�r�.•:�., . t Jj A ��.•'�'^'1 V,'••:jti[t• •4/ L. `J+j I ,t i•""•: ;';`fit•f1.,t.,?S' '") - l > t}Yr ir'",isi. •r';tiJ. ` r 1 1 'I'.1+•..y ° t atr,•PJis'y' + 1 ,'t .'L'j J'+=w r 4 i ,�� '1 I E\ t _ •r `jrtvyrw a ry�-st... \����G I Y f �t •�`i :r.9c' 4, - �' ' '�"��'� ,�r t _� 'Y 6�T� V"'L � f — + - �• � �{(rye.,•• •��y,�t� ' � 'P%ft7�1!' ��j•"�'�iyl�iS n i•' Y S, r. r _ t_ �'ti + .iRv�)'•7 f;4�'^•t- e � rr E' � R"•d i rT"r"��' 2++ • ��yf � p �, � �tix�� t.. 3 �- ��•� j� ±�f,.�,'�r, a tu���•' 7+uFt GL. ��r' Gvt' Fi��„7� •itr� r :) ; , E ` �w6t.kF* I QN1 �`,SE o� f ��j •SVti � '' ..� .�v'if" }'1a ��+t� * aIG rt fif ^ C? !•,r• '$ C1tll f l �h� rl3iw11J�� tZ � ''ter "''! RIG rr ir• s•:4r"'�'' + S POW*, r •w ,,�� M�f:, jr �. Jr, r. •ay�hr�,"?"''•,r�%..t 1iy7^ • _ .�"� ><:_' '�u.1i-A' ;:ice. '. .� � I \/v/ '� � j � w CzL. Ri.� � �cr i. ��k' 9 �• �C1.19 a r'tx.Yt�t+ .J:r�.�"i5' �.Rr+�,Y�� '^,' ' - _ u _�;,;,, ���" r -- •�z�. Etc , <:_,� ,:�. , I '� � = , J (tl { t ,•tee W p _ t .. i '�f{: r WNW GL r e,f >.r .,• .:r,. - rill r iu,•p n �' 2 � N:.tt%GL ? �n'- ;rlyo:t /,ry. � RY t rrg4'�.r• y :4v'r�,Gtain. !'•a. i • 'fir !Rlls� - .. ._ .,,:•sxr:•.a. � f atu.te.; '�yp� EO., t Yt�• .,tjf e �,,x �, t�,a. :i �~ l / •t; •{ L :"•"'� :�:: y § GPIR �� wi`t►...t�'r v ',Cr R• •"�:4 ,.. �j•^ ,�}� _ \ t_ i'�,'�• '+�1y - c �•�•••� �Jz '�� Z1.II 4e , 1.. ? j l",'b4C•''7"raWTtf 'r- `iw�:�:.iK��� `tJ'� l,�Qf ! '• :nr�rl��:t��ty...t �' ,`� .`J!C, i�F.?....i lO� f t �5�.;Jr_..Mra r Rp. • w`.�, �•' ,'W � �r li i ,� ��L'• •,'l, NL•t�Z^, t. ��•�. "T-., ---- _.�.�.t�Q_[i�`-_� l'Q'' �s �, r•}�r.��d�6 ---� . A. f ,Y * J tF.l••.�F __;: •-` r "r,..:.. < )rJ �. •.M tY tf)N JTYh•i_.•'• 'S`• ��` G� ~4 ,J ' �` 't+7 wT` 1 ..�.. .. ....�-•�_._- , t - -!'Li �rrl•^z6,S,:� • wy•L •C:. .R.� •h '.Ci+ 1L'�tF4 s�,..t r7' Sr3d. �J_ /� - i ;t�� "►i 24?�.-{., V�i\41. f .i;'�ta �,�;Ql�tS'(O, v/ _ "' -_-•L ',' :Sit{,'�,�!. .e+�n •�f'L.� T :1' �k 'Ftwu''r r. • i �YW;�a u £: � �� 1 �� y.Nj"X.•i�/��r _a)^� k�"f. _?fes „ii.' jj• .. r� 'tL 15!,,. \;-?� .,'��T�{..r ►.;'�� - ` ., ._, .�.'r.:: ,r' ?' .�.* `'y=i•f` f. �I'j � - t� WS`�'�G�'G ,k{ t. s .. f"-`...�.r.�•.>- 1 tL__.'- j. :T L.ti,e�.. 4��•t:iz. r+v _ f �.` �*•.0 l}�I�••..a l �. �t =_ d k •�� � � C E�.l��►. t ��" ,M �. 'F14 wr i + } f { tett! t 1 `` �w l..� �/ .• 1 t. ±�Laf�'••�- i at •.�4 r ..n �G� f� ✓ �(t�t � 'yt/S T•)!L.- y�)l.GeVi�/'/ t f'Wl-r' 'i ` r�..k � _ 11� c - ,•�• _ i /} i' 1.. 'SG .^J yl j f ! 5� F� rz•� 7.2 ~ r• , d � >� .. ,,:. l Ole- : , .?i) P� t: •rt.at tti }4 tYl ' +? •..: 1 N, EIl �FiV.t� W, t re '�•��h� ir ••Tr�'ts?'b..��'* ar 'r[y.l,.yam' t� { - _. Fi *: pop', \f� ��.1i F � �'t•f,� h• f4i• )F.n.•- I p f a �'a7��t.�r�Y•_. ,yew� r 5 •�~r •t• t N _ C�� �r•-.� f,� '• � �.. ...� /C't��(.�. •c���` + �• t _ ''rtltL• �,r_t 1, 1 • 'p" Jr. :r, ..:,rte.. -�•-�,._� �-�� { • t �". ; h - tr.�t. M4�r � .'�' t r.. (' r � 1 K�. r f ,�,4•„;* .t.i •/ .�r�,nri C iv. ..,•,�, ,+"�jrk•,� SZ- �'�GSI2J t9 i t t 7 �.�,•'�i r� _� .�`-� : _ i ,i�nst � ���1��'�•�'•i'ir.''`.'�•• J,�'°v.� � ��1 _ �+r�.*.>�}� t - 7�x •r�L�r.� � t �j -•} � Nf"'cs'2 '•war �,: ' y,��.:s.' 11%:�'!i� 1 t �� �( `� 'J GL (�- ex `,:,'�k ( .. ►-t r�,or•J :�.,.��rT,.r�.(p��r K E �'C.� •r c.,� t ! _ "ti'�t 'Iti• 7 1;` —�—w - - - _- - .Til*T�' �r.! .� ''7♦ t t1ti• •� , v, ,_��'_~-_ rj.tL ..._ 'y { .I_r.,1 .�•y'' / /� , +ly;j•,:';+';,'r.' ., '•ti. ` .2V.�•�9 _ t. � •hF AR �Rf� ,�GL''F 1R;J•\;�1 + - _ •'''r•Y��.•�..L \OPV }:.� i ��, `y;' `PL�a �QR� is ] t-,r- ��fi �. 1Y _` '�•-+_ ._. '•�r•�",�,� - ... t` t tp!},, N rT lttQ v (F ?,��.; .�T��"rA r, .FLt'!._ �L,S.. l��p tet' � -;.,jr,�/•`Fr �(��t tk�--_ - i���'r�t �'��y(',1•rt� r'Lr!• ,V•� G 4.e..7 p�.I .�1wrn��l`yK'�r! Si4 \.t•:i.+ �..t� f � -Mt[R~..� a :�•�'r'h ar{ r�a�„�, �r) + `t ""�e' +7V.�v?�G::.� At.:rra Gi: Qiiri.rS�. E�,... r :-Z' ;,.e:i , 1J� ori! �';• � - - ;cy -'w ` 1 � �J a`t °^.! nCt.i. `► urG 7Ica. 1W` ilras}�1• R�"'' ...,���ll r ,^.L„�t7�-p".'3 r'r•4•. w_'`6- + 'rf+w ri. 1 f �PT"twirr ..• Y , ~��ea�„r�� •u, ;.•,, .'� �.. l'�:,v, `•f _ , •�.�.*•, r+fr ��a3v7�6!1;i,., j � W• {" tCy.." "tr1L � ' a r�sf��:6•N`P..y•' �___ y�`y O� � � •.�, f I a 'r) �•. c. rQp..�,�•u�,[, of L rY.t_ A s f•1r1 �•,-r'^•2�c z•.w, y♦.t.`,..,L7,� •t . J. r T r•?'r>`+ti r.�w .l- i i i. r `.!" i► Ow'. ?dc,3'.i a+ct: t7+ 1. � 4'�_ _ "`gyp `. ',�' 38 Cascade Blc►d. �'^•«�•� r3.Ti1fi WIN f(v r:.rc 2 of 5 �'• r u WW N G t/3 I'std�Oe ;eQ � R c' t 10380 Vf/CAsc.Ade Blvd. '"�T`" P.,e jos+o '..:, �. F e, x /E P Saye(S13}X4266 ,;'_ a' ` of S n� .J 3� Pbrure(aEXs}2 F1 i6� ;t z. T 3 �, r3 a 7: 'o,r.3c '.:. - ,•M.J,�rYf,�,,,, a r,K t, _ .«+-.._.--•.,....._..-� �. �'} , ?''L Y, 4 vl S' _.elxvs3L+tfwuda��•' l'.::`wS_ v ---�� �a�'El'—i__ of ./ .,,��[q�° y t••^+(.{e•.f�;."++�r=. _.,. _ 08/20/96 II-III� IInIII IIImama Im17 111 if I II I�l� ll�l�l(I I I`I�l�I�i(I(I( I(I(I(l�l(1(i I I(1(I(I�I(IL1 I(�(I(I�I(I(I I i�i(I(I�I(I�f ! I(I(I(I�l(I(I t i(III(I�I(I(Ifl l IJI�I�I(I(f� !ll(ICI�I(III( � uliiiiiiiiil�i�l inilniimiilmr�rliillnr lu�lrrn'�rlluu Imlllu Ilullll Iln hm I (lililluihi�ilrmlilii ru�liui �rlrlimliiuliiu Iliilnu nnliiiilnnliu��nrllmm�ulnii inilnii liiihei� rnrhm nrrlrmlmrlurilrruhrn rrirri�ilnn urrbni nnlni•rn ,�C._..'F"-",-.�5•J_S:`:^.5:...:. ........,uy.„+.�-.","TAr;,,'j a}z.:�npq.).�.,w;;.t�a:.c�f ,. ., ,_:...,,. .. ....., .. -•..,. ,,; � � ,. LOAD RATED _ r- MINIMUM W 7tT.UNATEBAND OF SAME SIZE OPEN WEB JOIST IS ON TOP OF CK AS HANGER STM 24"OIA 50.., DIA. MAX. T �Irl \ +10 I \ V TABLE 4-Z ,� MINIMUM HANGER SIZES FOR ROUND DUCT 1 Die. Spednp OM. Rod _ ;SAP q 22 Q a. c,l�s \�� / \ 111-181, 12' Two 12 12' One 12 ga. 1/4 " 1" x 22 go. r �\ Is Purl R�a��� __� 19-24" 12' or One to ga�� 1/a'. 1., X 22 ga. - \ UPJ.} (-��r 2 'tLr+nR �\ 1'. •?t +fir 1'co-1s1> \�I— — — 37-50" 12' Two 8 gs. Two 1" x20 ge. 37-50" 12' -----� Two 3/8" Two 1" x 20 go. �\ Crib i�•( k `�`, 5'-60" 12' -----► Two 3/8" Two 1'" x 10 na. 61-84" 12' Two 3/8" Two 1" x IC a 4g z HVAC DUCT CONSTRUCT'/® I ;; STANDARDS tom" METAL AND FLEXIBLE G SITS PLAN _- __ �l ► � ��� �... ... :��.� �.�..�....�• I r---V Tu1j;4 50, 141 Look IF ��.v tom, _ � TLy, � �c� y..�.. w. /D-aY�y L \ � (.90 00 I up r i UPPER FLO R `�. Hoftontal Unit Supply/Return IN General 12'12, 15 Tan CLF-ARANCE 48 � ra � CLEARANCE 60 Data Stanc:ard Efficiency LLQ�Q �: \ FH0111117ONTAL UNITS ILTER ACCESS OOO ,AD0011111 ONLY Table 12-1 General Data CLEARANCE T2 �\ 2Vrr S.A, Gv•L.LE; 7 C- y u ����s F��-r✓�. (9) \ - 121r,Ton Downtlow and HYC*15ai units3,a4 15 Ton Downll- and HorizontalWB .B4, 1 I ` ` / YC*15083,Ei4 BW1. YCa15083,84,BWH YCa18p83.&LBWL YC*18pB3.B1,BWH Cooling Performance' SUPPLY ` Gross Cooling Capacity 155.000 183.000 EER' 8 70r 860 Nominal CFM/ARI Rated CFM 5,000/4 400 6OW6.300 RETURN ARI Net Cooling Capacity 146.000 172,000 \ Iniegralea Part L ala value' 900 890 1 HORIZONTAL -0 System Power(KW) 16 78' 2000' COMM NSATE Heating Performance' ri �1� DRAW Heating T NPT Heating Input(Blue) 150 000 250ooels Low 9000 250.000 350h Low 9000 �ONNE ONO `\ \ 1st Stage I00,Or J 175,000 1';,.1700 250,000 24'iN rt \ Heeling Output(dtun) 122.000 203.000 203.000 284.000 CLEARANCE 18 gfy [� CLEARANCE 38 t s1 Stage 81.000 142.000 142.000 203000 16 1 U P �\ L AFUE[%)' (DownhowlHonzontau 810/810 00 7179 9 807/799 501/79 1 18�T \• ../ \ Nor l �� Sleady Slate Efficiency(1�) 810 810 BID 810 \� ��f�\\ No Burners 1 1 I No Stages 2 2 \\\ r I Gas Conrwction Pipe Size(in} 112 112 14 • \/ { compressor No/type 21ClimatuH"' - � _ 2/Irane-H - lO I I Sound Noting(HFLSY 92 92 (IQU L F fvL I Outdoor Coll - Type Hr-Performance Hi-Performance Tube Size I 3 —� , 7 taco Area(sq sq ft l)l 188 8 65 2399 6 Indoor Coil Type — �- Hi-Perla nce Hi-Performance I 18 ll Tube Size(in) 37a 375 rr s Face Area Isq hl 1583 1750 Rows/rPi 2/15 215 I I Reingerant Control -J Cap,narq Tube Capiltary Tube i y I Drain Connection No/Size Un 1 111 OONPI it 00 NPT I Outdoor Fan-1 ype Propeller Propeller c �NConPclnATE D No Used/Dwrieter(n 1 2126 2/26 VH E A T r N G i Dr:.'Type No Speeds Directll Dnucul D i \ CFM 10000 10.600 No Motors/HP 2150 2/50 _ Motor RPM 1 100 1 100 Indoor Fan•Type FC Centrifugal ^ FC Cenuicuysl `�r+�' �{.�( 1A f No Used/Diemeler(in I ills X 15 1/15 x 15 H O D A S 1�-# V R O M G i 1 O u I�►D F L O 0� Drive 1lots Spet+ne BeM/1 BNUt No Mrnast 1 _ Motor HP(Standarn/Overnized) 3 0h 0 3 015 0i, APPRO V CD By: L�C-6- DRAWN BY p Ir 'r sY) —'^-- Motor RPM(StandarafOversized) 1740/3450 17406450 SCALE: �1 I.4c ,i, •d�,�i p Mot(x Freme Size(StandarU/Overs+rM) 145TI145T 145T1145T DATE: /�j -�z 1Y -- - _ r' REVISED rJ flhere-TypeJFurrxsMd Thrbwthvev/Yes Th(awaweylYes 0 c /� C 1 (fJo)Size Reccxlxrlanded (2)20 x 20 x 2 (2)20 x 20 x 2 ��Q(1 S.W. CAV'1✓ADG e _ (4)20x25X2 (4)2px25x2 Wt/''ii// � c Reh'1/anM--hw s(Lbs c4 R-22)' 9 VCacurt e — — 10 3clicot i 10380 SW Cascade Blvd. DRAWINO MUMa1[R T I GAR D OR. 2587 � 5 of 5 I( ij t 7� ,,: .. .. ,a,;"ffAl " )tr�F;ii'�•pf15471rM:b>'•al'Tb;'WNM�'� •1•ri• . ..,�,:, -✓n .. :. - ii-:..,�" .w,f�r•f:7T!w:, ,. _ 08/20/96 �I{I {I{I� I �I �I{I I�!{I{ISI{I{III{I{I{I{I{f{ISI I{I{I{I�I{I{I I{I{I{I�I;i{I I til{I�I�I{til/ I{ISI{I�ICi{I I 111111111111W11111111110 I{1 {1{I1I{lil ( til I{I{lil lililililillI lil{I�III{lili INCH MADE W CMNM Imitinillnlinnli