Loading...
11/04/2015 - Packet ■ Completeness Review for Boards, Commissions and Committee Records CITY OF TIGARD TTAC -Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee Name of Board, Commission or Committee November 4,2015 Date of Meeting I have verified these documents are a complete copy of the official record. Joe Patton,Meeting Secretary Print Name gnature January 6, 2016 Date City of Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee Agenda MEETING DATE/TIME: November 4,2015— 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: Tigard Library, 2nd Floor Conf. Room, 13500 SW Hall Blvd. 1. CALL TO ORDER Kevin 6:30 Welcome and Introductions 2. CONSIDER MINUTES Kevin 6:35 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Kevin 6:40 4. CIP PRIORITIZATION All 6:45 5. FOLLOW-UP TO COUNCIL MEETING Kevin 7:15 6. STREET MAINTENANCE FEE Mike 7:20 REPORT AND DISCUSSION 7. SIDEWALK GAPS PROGRAM Mike 7:40 8. BIKE/PED SUBCOMMITTEE OVERVIEW Ben/Joe 7:55 9. FY 2015 PROJECT/BUDGET REVIEW Mike 8:05 10. PROJECT UPDATES Mike 8:15 11. OTHER BUSINESS All 8:25 12. ADJOURNMENT Kevin 8:30 Supporting materials/handouts October 7, 2015 Minutes October 20, 2015 Minutes Transportation Project Update Planning Calendar TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA— November 4, 2015 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 oft L•\Community Development\Board Committees Commissions\TTAC\2015\19_November\TTACAgenda 20151104.docx CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes November 4, 2015 Members Present: Kevin Watkins (Chair), Karen Hughart (Vice Chair),Benjamin Gooley,Don Schmidt, Elise Shearer, Erik Halstead,Mark Bogert, Stephanie McKee,Joseph Vasicek (alternate), Ravi Nagaraj (alternate), and Timothy Esau (alternate). Members Absent: Evelyn Murphy and Jennifer Stanfield. Staff Present: Buff Brown, Sr. Transportation Planner;Mike McCarthy, Streets and Transportation Sr. Project Engineer; and Joe Patton, Sr. Administrative Specialist. Others Present: City Councilor John Goodhouse,TTAC Liaison and Susan Pfahl,resident. 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Watkins called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. The meeting was held in the Tigard Library, 2nd Floor Conference Room, at 13500 SW Hall Blvd. 2. CONSIDER MINUTES The October 7 and October 20, 2015 meeting Minutes were approved. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment. 4. CIP PRIORITIZATION Kevin gave a brief overview of the results of the CIP Project ranking and presented a DRAFT CIP prioritization list. After discussion,it was unanimously agreed (1) to organize the projects into three categories and (2) accept the project listings as outlined in the DRAFT. Kevin will revise the category titles to reflect the Committee's perspectives on project completion/implementation within the six-year planning horizon. The resulting list will be forwarded to staff and the Council as the TTAC prioritized CIP. It was noted that the Hunziker St. Sidewalk and Tigard Heritage Trail projects are moving forward as they were the only projects that qualified for specific grants. 5. FOLLOW-UP TO COUNCIL MEETING Kevin stated the meeting went well and the presentation was well received. He received a lot of positive feedback. 6. STREET MAINTENANCE FEE REPORT AND DISCUSSION Mike noted that the current fee is $6.12 per household. The fee adopted in 2010 was to hold the line with preventative maintenance. There are 22 miles of roads that need paving. The big question is what to do with the backlog streets. The longer it takes to address them the more expensive it becomes. The goal is to take care of the backlog within the next 10 years. Some of the obstacles are accessible ramps. Costs for arterials and collectors are split by residential (2/3) and commercial (1/3);residential paid entirely by residential and non-residential collectors paid for by commercial. Current funding being considered is 40%residential, 60% commercial. To address the backlog Page 1 of 2 TIGARD TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE November 4,2015 would result in a residential increase from$6.12 to $7.82 per household per month, a non-residential fee increase from$1.38 to $2.76 per parking space per month and both would adjust with inflation. Councilor Goodhouse asked for feedback from TTAC.A new public survey will take place and the results discussed at a future meeting along with a comparison of similarly sized cities. 7. SIDEWALK GAPS PROGRAM Safe Routes To School has revealed areas where improvements are necessary. Mike said a rough estimate to fill in the gaps along major streets and arterials,not including neighborhood streets, would cost well over$100 million. Current transportation funding sources include vehicle registration fees,state gas tax, city gas tax, transportation development tax,and transportation system development charges.Another funding source specifically designated for sidewalks is ideal. Elise will attend the Council Workshop on November 17 to voice TTAC's support for a program to fund filling sidewalk gaps. Mike noted the projects ranged from $100 to$5,000 per linear foot, depending upon adjacent wetlands, need for retaining walls,purchase of property,etc. 8. BIKE/PED SUBCOMMITTEE OVERVIEW Ben noted that the subcommittee meets third Wednesday of every month.The Chair must also be a TTAC member, the Co-Chair does not. Some of the projects they have been involved with are Tour de Parks, articles in Cityscape,Metro trail count,and Safe Routes To School as well as feedback on upcoming paving/sidewalk projects. Future projects may include a run or dual bike/run contest. 9. FY 2015 PROJECT/BUDGET REVIEW Postponed until a future meeting. 10. PROJECT UPDATES Mike gave a brief update of the projects. River Terrace will have approximately 1,.500 homes over the next year. 11. OTHER BUSINESS The December meeting is cancelled. 12. ADJOURNMENT Chair Watkins adjourned the meeting at 8:37 pm. QK royz* Joe Patton,TIAC Meeting Secretary ,1 ATTEST:Kevin Watkins, Chair Page 2 of 2 CIP Prioritization TTAC Meeting November 41 2015 Background • Prioritization "framework" �I — 6-year planning timeframe — Requested "preferred projects" — No project cost factors • Proposed categories — Highest - complete in 6-year planning timeframe — High — complete as resources allow — Medium — conduct low-level development actions ProposedPrioritization • Highest Priority (Ave. Ranking < 6) — 1211t Avenue — Hall Blvd. Improvements — North Dakota Street — Tiedeman Avenue • High Priority (7 < Ave. Ranking < 9) — Fanno Creek Trail — 72nd Avenue Improvements — Hunziker Street — Tigard Street — Barrows Road — 1161h Avenue • Medium Priority (Ave. Ranking > 9) — Scoffins Street — Westside Trail TTAC - CIP Project Ranking Project Average 121 st Ave (Whistler to Tippitt) Complete Street 3.38 Highest Hall Blvd Improvements (Placeholder) 4.58 Priority North Dakota St (Greenburg Rd to Fanno Creek Trail) Sidewalk 5.23 Tiedeman Ave (Tigard St to Greenburg Rd) Sidewalk 5.54 Fanno Creek Trail (Bonita Rd to Durham Rd) 7.08 72nd Ave Improvements (Placeholder) 7.83 * Commercial Street (95th to Lincoln) Complete Street 8.00 High Hunziker St (72nd to 77th) Sidewalk 8.17 Priority Tigard Street (Gallo Ave to Fanno Creek) 8.33 116th Ave (Tigard St to Katherine St) New Trail Across Summer Creek 8.67 Barrows Road (Springwood to Anna) Sidewalk on Southeast Side 8.67 *Tigard Heritage Trail (along old rail line) 8.83 -------------------------------- --- Medium ------------------------------ ---Medium I Scoffins St (Hall Blvd to Ash Ave) Sidewalks 9.08 Priority i Westside (Powerline) Trail 10.08 -------------------------------------- * The City is moving forward with these two projects as they were the only projects that qualified for specific grants Transportation Project U12date — October 28, 2015 Bonita Road (Faring Creek to I - 5) The majority of the work in Bonita Road has been completed. The contractor is working on punch list, cleanup, and finishing items. Minor traffic delays and additional night work are possible.. River Terrace The first River Terrace developments are underway. Earthwork and grading has started on a 137-lot subdivision and a 215-lot subdivision located west of Roy Rogers Road just south of Scholls Ferry Road, and an 82-lot subdivision west of 150`'Avenue south of Bull Mountain Road. If you have any questions, please contact Mike White at 503-718-2464. Hwy 99W / Gaarde Street / McDonald Street The Hwy 99W / Gaarde / McDonald project has reached substantial completion (earlier than we anticipated). Crews are installing landscaping, other finish items, and cleanup. ODOT is adjusting the signal timing based on the new traffic configuration. http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/REGION1/Pages/GaardeMcDonald.aspx Scholls Ferry Road (Cascade Ave to Hwy 217) An ODOT safety project is improving sidewalks, signals, and lighting. The new signal has been activated which includes left turn arrows for traffic turning from Cascade onto Scholls Ferry. ODOT is fine-tuning the signal timing and operations. http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/REGION1/Pages/SchollsCascade.aspx Dirksen Nature Park Crews have removed some large trees to `free' the oaks in the oak savanna at Dirksen Nature Park. Wildflower bulbs are being planted. If you have any questions,please call Carla Staedter at 503-718-2788. Walnut Street (Tiedeman to 116`h and intersection with 135`'') Design is complete on this project which will be advertised for bids this fall. Construction is planned to start this winter and continue until spring 2017. The project will also include relocating existing overhead utilities underground; the design team has contacted each affected homeowner. Ross Street / 81st Avenue Developments Three private developments are under construction in the Ross/81"area: a)A large senior living center on the northeast corner of Ross and Hall,which will include new connections of 83'Ave south to Ross St and Matthew Park west to 83rd; b) A subdivision on the southwest corner of Ross and 81St,which will be making half-street improvements on their side of Ross and 81St and c) a subdivision on the east side of 8151, also making half-street improvements. Dartmouth Street (69t'Ave to 70th Ave) A developer has begun construction to widen the south side of Dartmouth Street from 69t'Ave to 70i•1'Ave,in conjunction with the Red Rock Center development. Hunziker Core / Wall Street Extension The city has issued a request for proposals (RFP) for design services for new public infrastructure improvements to SW Wall Street,providing a connection from SW Hunziker Road to Tech Center Drive. The project will support development and redevelopment of industrial lands to achieve higher levels of employment. TTA 2015 Planning 111412015 Month / Date Actions/Main Points January 7 Safe Routes to School overview; paving report February 4 Safety workshop w/Dr. Takallou; elections March 4 Funding sources overview; project updates April 1 Goarde/99W project review; SW Corridor workshop May 6 SW Corridor update (Metro); SW Service Enhancement Plan (TriMet) June 3 Traffic calming proposal; Walkable Cities preview July 1 (Cancelled) August 5 FY17 CIP planning; Council meeting preparations; N. Dakota Bridge project September 2 FY17 CIP planning; Hunziker Industrial Core project funding October 7 FY17 CIP presentation; Council meeting preparations (Oct 20th) November 4 FY17 CIP prioritization; FY15 project/budget review December 2 1 Safe Routes to School update; SW Corridor update - r' - 2015-2019 --- Tentative Grtenway - Pavement r VENTURA er Management J ' Ltes(Cr1i --- - _ Southridye 115 rY 'q \ '�-, _.. f- Plan lan LOCUStiT Z17 OAK ST — Paved with PLANKED additional W u OVERLAY 1 million NORTH ti KDra ' DAKOTA sr 2015 2016 I 51lMMER Q I m CRSS-1 DR Rp . - W 2015 2017 —� TIGARD ST -- -- yw jm- p,Jy e— - M l m, __ R �, 2017 2018 0. Fdw;erM$ _ tiiA �/✓ �' OiP.t - G01 V Q19 r fF, toCrescent Grovt r:rogress � � / rte' ALi+t13S ' LtylyS 5T ��q� -J' � r4 e\/` '1' � q\ Rmrrery Quarry / A !alar 1 , . �. T �� v�ysQN P Qat 2019 �/ N BARROWS RD 11 �� � r FONNEFt 5T /` t NAN�Pr Gb . ,GARDdaps qp I ) r 73725 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97223 `• ,, y.- - /, 509 - 639 4777 c, 1 www.tigard-or.gov RudDalp GAARDE ST ��G,_ J _L LAND ARK O mss. 4TIT c �- � ~ IBURY BONITA RD RDTwafty / i 1 I _P : -�•��� 1 r W zMS I � M�IAL a _ LH Rook III 111.x' I A V f m KARLLN t{ O —DURHAM RD DURHAM RD :CLul rn - ---~ -- -p Tigard ii5Cq aiac R v "Ler u c _ook _ :�• /�, - A„_ Pork - 20'15-20'19 � l GrBFnwAy r - - - _- _ — -'� �r ti 1 Tentat ►ue Pork Pavement Management Cfirove - - 4iAu2hradQe NS � Cemetery ' ��- l ��-�� � -� Plan LO .i ii _ �d q fits :zr � �I fJ / PLANNED OVERLAY 2015 _ y 4411(0TA 2016 d i lip TtGgR�p ST 9w f 2017 j r. Rp sr -- 2018 , rRt rte. f��L J JJ GrawF lgrFss r t' �` V�AGKt}T$� i ',v-. 2019 Ceme2Fquarry ry ' ^ r _ �. BARROWS RD i �. i �, _ _ �. � L7 s ' � I ----- -•_�. ✓'• _ L � 1 � i}. i,J` � �: j �QST � �. a= scare Fanno Creek -` �� �DX Polk f `_ 73723 SW"a" Blvd Tigard, Oregon 87223 —LL 503 . 539 . 4171 ` x� i ? www.fi and-or. ov 9 9 ,� ,�r• ��/ � � ci' � ,r�"— ��.-� Cs I Farr!L'v!r ��97+2775 �j 00NfTA I 4 J So jL ITA RD RD TWUNY r 1 �4 l L 1 Q DURHAM RD DURHAM RD 1 r � a _ � �; p Tigard HS i River " tl Tualatin _ 1^, sh Creek 99W -+-i IC _ '`. g ..�■ 2009 - 2014 Pavement 4N Overlay Slurry Seat = Projects 1001x0 C g 2014 Pro ecfs V 1 Pavement Overlay ` G. A=R- N�'S DISI A-L-D-S T-. 2013 Projects Slully Seal MI �E Pavement Overlay LL 1111 iJ,Y 1�=�-� [T►-0="+� �"�_ •` � -- - 9 BN =TA�R =B*I 2012 Projects tib Slurry seal ' I r Pavement Overlay U) ----- 2011 Projects -, tSlurry Seal V l Pavemenr Overlay JU 2010 Projects. _ � eurry SStrmulus 2009 Projects Slurry Sea/ Pavement Overlay .rLjajabn River es Q S r � �. �9 L(/ Tualatin River. - J Strut Maintenance Fee Update — Draft For Council Workshop September 15, 2015 1 BACKGROUND 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE STREET MAINTENANCE FEE The Street Maintenance Fee (SMF)is a charge that is paid by Tigard residents and businesses on their monthly utility bill. The fee is used primarily to fund routine maintenance of Tigard's roads through the Pavement Management Program(PMP). In addition to the PIviP,the SRIF pays for$100,000 of right-of-way (ROVE)maintenance. The ROWmaintenance keeps plantings and grounds around and in the medians of larger roads in good condition. Lastly,about seven percent of the fee is used to help pay for the cost of billing the fee. 1.2 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The SMF was last calculated in 2009 based on the 2010 PMP,once fully implemented,the fee has been increased by an annual index. Council and staff have held meetings in January and March of 2015 to discuss policy issues around the PMP and the SMF as well as the results of public outreach regarding the fee. At the last meeting on March 17,2015,Council provided staff with key policy directions that permitted staff to recalculate the SMF. The purpose of this report is to document Council policy directions and show how they,.x-M impact the Street Maintenance Fee. Z POLICY SUMMARY ,During the Council Study Sessions in january and March 2015,Council provided policy direction on key aspects of the Street Maintenance Fee. This policy direction was aided by outreach to the community through surveys and meetings. The Table 1 summarizes the key decisions. 1IPage 7'ABLE I—SUMMAR Y OF P©LICYDIRECTTON Policv Area Issue Council 1 Action/Impact Pavement The current PCI goal of the Increase the goal Tigard has a backlog of streets that are Condition Index PMP is 72-75 per Res# 10-01. PCI to be 80-82, in poor condition anti are in need of an (PCI)goal of the The current PCI of Tigard's This is where street overlay. The cost to fix these streets is PMP system is 70.5 per the 20714 maintenance costs about$11 million, Council directed ?snrtual Paving Report are considered to be staff to add these streets on top of the least expensive, existing program. once the lev=el is achieved. ADA Sidewalk The ADA requires that Council directed TMC will be amended. The cost of the Cuts sidewalk comer cuts be installed that T IC be PMP will include this additional to ADA standards when work clarified to allow the requirement. is performed on the road use of SMF dollars adjacent to the sidewalk. TMC for work related to is ambiguous regarding the use paving,including of SMF for sidewalks. sidewalk corner cuts required by federal law. _ Split of Program TNTC splits the cost of the Council directed The upcoming workplan will require a Costs between program based on work Clone that the splits in larger proportion of work on Arterials Residential and on road types. For example, TNTC remain and local Commercial streets than the Non-Residential arterial roads are paid 38% unchanged. prior workplan. Non-Residential Customers Residential and 62%Non- customers pay the majority of the costs Residential. When the last for these road types. The impact of update was performed,the maintaining the splits in TMC will be planned work resulted in a 2/3, an increase in the share of the program Residential and 1/3,,'Non- costs for Non-Residential customers Residential split and a larger fee increase than Residential,customers will bear. _ Right of Way The current SMF pays for Council directed This will have no impact on Residential Maintenance $100,0100 of ROW maintenance that$50,000 be customers. Non-Residential customers annually. This cost is entirely added annually to rill see a modest increase in their SMF. borne by Residential customers. the RDW Since the last program was maintenance. This calculated,Council has agreed additional cost will to maintain ROW in be paid by Non- commercial areas around Pacific Residential Huy and Ilvlain Street. No customers. funding source has been identified for thus requirement_ Cap an Non- i The current-BIC caps the Council directed The 1WC will need to be amended to Residential SMF I charge on Non-Residential that the cap be remove the cap on required parking 1 customers to 250 required removed and that spaces charged. Since the removal of parking spaces, the additional spaces the cap is intended to create additional. charged create revenue, the Non-Residential fee will additional revenue, be calculated as if the cap is in place. _ not a lower fee- The SNfF is indexed and can Council agreed to No action is needed. Staff increase by 2-7%per year, continue to index recommends applying the index to the the fee._ ROWr� ogram as well as the P1\IP. 21 Paye 3 FEECALCULATION 3.1 EmSTING PROGRAM Tigard's streets that are maintained by the Pavement Management Program are divided into four categories. The cost of maintaining each category is divided between Residential and Non-Residential Customers by TMC 15,20.050. The allocation is as follows in Table 2 TABLE 2-DETERMINATION OF STREET MAINTENAIVCE FEE Street T�rpe Residential Share Non-Residential Sh-are Arterial 38% 62% Collector 50% - 50% Local Commercial - — 0'%0 100% Local Residential 100% - - 0% Staff has assembled the next four years of the.PMP for 2016-2019. The list of projects at the existing program level is in Appendix A of this report. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP)adopted by Council as part of the FY2016 Budget includes $8,100,000 of PMP projects for 2016-2019. The list of projects in Appendix A is consistent with the adopted CIP with$8,068,000 in projects for the same four year period. When the fee was last calculated,the largest category of street work was in the Local Residential. This was largely responsible for the overall program resulting in Residential customers paying for 67%of the PMP through the fees. The projects in Appendix A reflect the need to work on Tigard's arterial roads. Tl-ie result is that the Non-Residential customers will take on a larger share of the program,approximately 42'%0. Table 3 shows the share of the program by road type and the resulting customer shares for the program calculated in 2010 and the new program starting in 2016. The shift from Local Residential streets to arterial roads is in bold. TABLE 3-COMPARISON OF COST SHARES FOR 2010 AND 2016 FEE CALCULATIONS 010 t Arterial 27% 44% 230/o Local Commercial 511/0 — Local.Residential 43%a 28%® Residential Share — 67%- 581",) p Non-Residential 33% 42% Share -- — Under the current program,the SMF pays for two other cost centers. First,the fee pays for$100,000 in ROW maintenance. Second,the fee pays the proportionate share for the cost of billing,which can vary slightly by year and is about 7%of the cost of the program. 'fable 4 displays each of the costs centers in the current program supported by the SMF. Each of the cost centers are allocated to the customer types to determine the cost share for each customer category. Those costs are then divided by the number of units in each category:residences for Residential customers and required parking for Non-Residential customers. 31Page This is done to derive the Street Maintenance Fee that would be calculated without any change in policy or program. TABLE4—SMFCALCULATIONFOR CURRENTPROGRAMSERWELEVEL Cost Center 4-vear Cost (% $ Arterial 3,512,000 38°`o 1,334,600 62% 2,177,400 Collector 1,863,000 50Rr) 931,500 50% 931,500 Commercial 424,000 011'0 - 100% 424,000 Residential 2,269,000 100°x'0 2,269,000 0% - Current Residential 431,100 100% 431,100 01,10 - ROW Maintenance Billing(79/4) 564,800 58% 330,000 42% 234,800 Total 9,063,900 58% 5,296,200 42% 3,767,700 Annual Average 1,324,0.50 941,925 Units Residences 20,813 - !—Required 39,723 Parking Fee For Current $5.30 $1.98 Pavement Programa The current Street Maintenance Fee is$6.12 per month per residential unit for residential customers and $1.38 per month per required parking space for non-residential customers. '%%ile the cost of the 4-}rear program is the same as anticipated under the current fee,the redistribution of the projects needed in the next four years from residential streets to arterial roads results in a decrease of$0.82 in the residential SMF and an increase of$0.60 for non-residential SMF. 3.2 PAVING BACKLOG As stated in Table 1,Council is setting a goal for the PMP to bring the city's PCI up to 80-82. 'Phis will be accomplished by addressing a backlog of streets in need of repair that the current funding level supported by the SMF cannot address. The plan is to address the approximately$11 million in backlog projects over the next ten years. Appendix B has the list of all the PMP projects that would be completed as part of the current service level plus the backlog projects. In Appendix B,the added backlog projects are highlighted. Table 5 shows the cost of the backlog projects on when allocated to the street classifications. The resulting SMF calculation is the amount that would need to be added to the fee for the current program calculated in Table 4. 4 1 P a g c TABLE 5—SMF CALCULATIONFOR BACAZOGPROJECTS+ONLY Cost Center 4-vear Cost Arterial - 38% - 62% - Collector 203,000 50% 101,500 50% 101,500 Commercial 1,074,000 0D°o - 1000/6 1,074,000 Residential 2,254,000 100% 2,254,000 0% - Billing(7%) 247,100 67% 164,800 33% 82,300 Total 3,778,100 67% 2,520,300 33% 1,257,800 Annual Average 630,075 314,450 Units Residences 20,813 Required 39,723 Parking Fee For Additional _ $2.52 $0.66 Backlog Projects As shown in Table 5,the majority of the backlog streets are local streets for commercial and residential areas. The result is that the share of the costs is 671%paid by residential customers and 33%paid by non-residential customers. The fees calculated at the end of Table 5 will be in addition to the fees for the current program level calculated in Table 4. 3.3 ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY MAINTENANCE IN COMMERCIAL AREAS As stated in Table 1,Council has directed that the ROV'maintenance program be expanded. Currently,the ROVE'maintenance program is$100,000 annually and is paid entirely by residential customers. Since the program was unple-mented in 2010,Tigard has placed an emphasis on beautifying roadways in commercial areas. This beautification includes requiring ODOT to place planted medians in Pacific Hwy and improvements along Main Street in Downtown Tigard. At tlus point,Council is recommending expanding the ROW maintenance program by$50,000 annually to be paid by non-residential customers. Residential customers will continue to pay for the current$100,000 annually. Table G displays the impact of the additional ROW maintenance on the calculation of the SMF. Under the new program,it is anticipated that the ROVt'maintenance will increase annually by the index with the other cost centers. TABLE 6—SMF CALCULATIONFOR ADDITIONAL COMMERCL4L STREET RICiHT--OF- WAYMAINTENANCE ONLY Cost Center 4-year Cost 0/o $ Proposed Commercial 215,500 001/0 - 100°x'0 215,500 Billing(70/6) 15,200 — 00 0 - 100% 15,200 Total 230,700 0% - 100% 230,700 Annual Average - 57,675 Units Residences 20,813.00 Required 39,723.00 Parking Fee For Additional $0.00 $0.12 ROW Maintenance 5I11ag 4 SUMMARY OF STREET MAINTENANCE FEE CALCULATION The prior section calculated the impact of on the Street Maintenance Fee for various components:current program level,adding backlog projects,and adding right-of-way maintenance in commercial areas. During the study sessions in January and March,staff informed Council that it was likely that the cost share for the current program level would likely shift toward the non-residential rate payers based upon the list of upcoming needed projects,but the extent of the shift was unknown at the time of the study sessions. Staff advised Council that addressing the backlog of streets to bring the PCI up to the goal area of 80-82 will add about 50016 to the overall program costs and the fee calculation. Lastly,staff stated that the ROW maintenance would create a modest increase in the fee paid by non-residential customers. TABLE 7—SUMMABYOFSMF CAL CULATION AND COMPARISON OFNEWFEE CALCULATION TO CU7i",IWNT FEE BASED ON 2010 PMP Component-, Fee $Chane °!o Chane Fee $Chane °gyp Chan e Current SMF From $6.12 $1.38 2010 PMP Proposed Fees Based on 2016-2019 PMP and Policy Changes Current Pavement $5.30 -$0.82 -13°,o $1.98 $0.60 43% Program Level _ Backlog Pavement $2.52 $2.52 41% $0.66 $0.66 48% Projects Proposed ROW $0.00 $0.00 0110 $0.12 $0.12 9% Maintenance Total Proposed Street $7.82 $1.70 28% $2.76 $1.38 100% Maintenance Fee Based upon Council policy direction and the work of the PMP shifting from residential streets to arterial roads,the SMF will increase by 281:o for residential customers and 100°`o for non-residential customers. 61 Pange 5 APPENDIX A- PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AT CURRENT SERVICE LEVEL 2016 Paving and Maintenance Plan Pavement overlays unless stated otherwise Total °"n of Street From To Classification Cost Cast Total Upper Boones Ferry 72nd Ave 1-5 Interchange Arterial $187,000 72nd Ave City Limits Durham Rd Arterial $124,000 72nd Ave Hwvv 99NX' 500'South Arterial $40,000 Bonita Rd 76th Ave Hall Blvd Arterial $293,000 Walnut St 116th 122nd Arterial $183,000 Greenfield Gaarde St Dr Walnut St Arterial $115,000 Crack Scaling/Maintenance $50,000 Arterial Total $992,000 54.5% Dartrnoutli St Atlanta St Hwy 99W Collector $49,000 121 st Ave Tippitt Ann Collector $133,000 78th Ave Hwy 99W Pfaffle Collector $40,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $30,000 Collector Total $252,000 13.9% Crack Sealing/Maintenance $15,000 Commercial Local $15,000 0.8%© Shaul•Seals on Residential Streets $360,000 Crack Seals on residential streets $200,000 Residential Total $560,000 30.8%d 2016'Total $1,819,000 7 1 P a e 2017 Paving and Maintenance Plan Pavement overlays unless stated otherwise Total %of Street From To Classification Cost Cost Total Greenburg Rd Hury 217 Center St Arterial $686,000 Durham Rd Hall Blvd Summerfield Dr Arterial $580,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $50,000 Arterial Total $1,316,000 67% Greenburg Tiedeman Ave Rd RR Tracks Collector $54,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $30,000 Collector Total $84,000 4°/® Crack Sealing/Maintenance $15,000 Commercial Local Total $15,000 1% Slurry Seals on Residential Streets $400,000 Crack Seals on residential streets $150,000 Residential Total $550,000 28% 2017 Total $1,965,000 8I11agc 2018 Paving and Maintenance Plan Pavement overlays unless stated othemise Total °loaf Street From To Classification Cost Cost Total 72nd rive Fir Beveland Arterial 1160,000 Gaarde 110th 123rd Terr Arterial 5441,000 72nd Ave Baylor 500'South of 99W Arterial $111,000 Upper Boones Ferry 72nd Ave Durham Rd Rd Arterial S170,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $40,000 Arterial Total $902,000 43% 121st Ave Ann Springwood Collector $274,000 121st Ave Gaarde St Whistlers Lp (North) Collector $96,000 Hunziker St 72nd 100'West Collector $64,000 Tiedeman Ave Walnut St Meadow St Collector $157,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $25,000 Collector Total $616,000 30% Crack Sealing/Maintenance $15,000 Commercial Local Total $15,000 1% Slurry Seals on Residential Streets $400,000 Crack Seals on residential streets $150,000 Residential Total $550,000 26% 2018 Total $2,083,000 9 1 Page 2019 Paving and Maintenance Plan Pavement overlays unless stated otherwise Total %of Street From To Classification Cost Cost Total Gaarde St 123rd Terr Greenfield Dr Arterial $262,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $40,000 Arterial Total $302,000 14"/o 135th Ave Walnut St Scholls Ferry Rd Collector $375,000 68th P"y Haines St Hwy 99W Collector $207,000 Locust St Greenhurg Hall Collector $304,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $25,000 Collector Total $911,000 41% Tigard St Main St Tiedeman Ave Commercial $260,000 Royalty Pkwy Hwy 99W Naeve St Commercial $104,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $15,000 Commercial Total $379,000 17% North Dakota St 121 st Ave 115th Ave Residential $109,000 Slurry Seals on Residential Streets $350,000 Crack Seals on residential streets $150,000 Residential Total $609,000 28% 2019 Total $2,201,000 10 1 Page 6 APPENDIX B- PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAMWITH BACKLOG PROJECTS ADDED Backlog projects are highlighted in Green. 2016 Paving and Maintenance Plan Pavement overlays unless stated otherwise Total %,of Street From To Class Cost Cost Total Upper Boones Ferry 72nd Ave I-5 interchange Arterial $187,000 72nd Ave City Limits Durham Rd Arterial $1243000 72nd Ave Hwy 99W 500'South Arterial $40,000 Bonita Rd 76th sive Hall Blvd Arterial $293,000 Walnut St 116th 122nd Arterial $183,000 Gaarde St Greenfield Dr Walnut St Arterial $115,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $50,000 Arterial Total $992,000 37.0% Dartmouth S€ Atlanta St Hwy 99W Collector $49,000 121st Ave Tippitt Ann Collector $133,000 78th Ave Hwy 99W Pfaffle Collector $40,000 Oak St Hall Blvd 90th Ave Collector $85,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $30,000 Collector Total $337,000 12.6% Hampton St 72nd Ave 66th Ave Commercial $140,000 Sandburg St 72nd Ave End of Street Commercial $155,000 Garden Place Huy 99W Hall Blvd (inc CDS) Commercial $160,000 Cardinal Ln Sequoia Purr End of Street Commercial $30,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $15,000 Commercial Local $500,000 18.6% Canterbury Ln 103rd Ave Hwy 99`x' Residential $253,000 79th Ave Leiser Ln Bonita Rd Residential $40,000 Slurry Seals on Residential Streets $360,000 Crack Seals on residential streets $200,000 Residential Total $853,000 31.8% 2016 Total $2,682,000 111 Pale 2047 Paving and Maintenance Plan Pavement overlays unless stated otherwise %of Street From To Mass Cost Total Total Greenburg Rd Hwy 21', Center St Arterial $686,000 Durham Rd Hall Blvd Summerfield Dr Arterial $580,000 Crack Scating/Maintenance $50,000 Arterial Total $1,316,000 45% T iedeman Ave Greenburg Rd RR Tracks Collector $54,000 Scoffins St Main St Ash Ave Collector $87,000 Commercial Ash Ave St Scoffins St Collector $31,000 Crack Scaling/Maintenance $30,000 Collector Total $202,000 7%n 1,20C"South of 74th Ave Durham Rd Bonita Commercial $219,000 Landmark Ln 72nd Ave End of Road Commercial $74,000 Czack Sealing/Maintenance $15,000 Commercial Local Total $308,000 1011/10 130th Ave Ha�xksbeard Scholls Ferry Residential $74,000 Alderbrook Dr Durham Rd Oakhill Ln Residential $49,000 Summerfield Dr Durham ltd 114th Ct Residential $105,000 Oak St 69th Ave 71 st Ave Residential $62,000 71 st Ave Oak St (X) Oak St(E) Residential $10,000 Fanno Creek Dr Bonita Rd Fanno Creek PI Residential $104,000 Summercrest Dr Tigard Dr 121 st Ave Residential $35,000 Kable St 98th Ave 100th Ave Residential $47,000 109th Ave Highland Dr Naeve St Residential $30,000 96th Ave Sattler St Murdock St Residential $56,000 Slurry Seals on Residential Streets $400,000 Crack Seals can residential streets $150,000 Residential.Total $1,122,000 38% 2017 Total $2,948,000 121pnge 2018 Paving and Maintenance Plan Pavement overlays unless stated otherwise Total %o f Street From To Class Cost Cost Total 722nd Ave Fir Beveland Arterial $160,000 Gaarde 110th 123rd Terr Arterial $441,000 72nd Ave Saylor 500'South of 99W Arterial $111,000 Upper Boones Ferry 72nd Ave Durham Rd Rd Arterial. $150,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $40,000 Arterial Total $902,000 33% 121 st Ave Ann Springwood Collector $274,000 121st Ave Gaarde St VL'hisders Lp (North) Collector $96,000 Hunziker St 72nd 100'West Collector $64,000 Tiedeman Ave Walnut St Meadow St Collector $157,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $25,000 Collector Total $616,000 22% Milton Ct Bonita End of Street $126,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $15,000 Commercial Local Total $141,000 5% Fortner St 115th Walnut Residential $239,000 74th Ave Barbara Ln Taylor's Ferry Rd Residential $175,000 Grant Ave End of Street Walnut Residential $30,000 Grant Ave Park St End Residential $50,000 Commercial St Lincoln 95th Residential $29,000 107th Ct Pathfinder Ct Fonner St Residential $13,000 Slurry Seals on Residential Streets $400,000 Crack Seals on residential streets $150,000 Residential Total $1,086,000 40% 2018 Total $2,745,000 131Pgg 2019 Paving and Maintenance Plan Pavement overlays unless stated otherwise Total %of Street From To Class Cost Cost Total Gaarde St 123rd Terr Greenfield Dr Arterial $262,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $40,000 Arterial Total $302,000 9% 135th Ave Walnut St Scholls Ferry Rd Collector $375,000 68th Pkwy Haines St Hwy 99W Collector $207,000 Locust St Greenburg Hall Collector $304,000 Crack Sealing/Maintenance $25,000 Collector Total $911,000 280/0 Tigard St Main St Tiedeman Ave Commercial $260,000 Royalty Pkwy Hwy 99\X' Naeve St Commercial $104,000 Atlanta St 69th Ave 68th Pkwy Commercial $33,000 69th Ave Atlanta St Baylor St Commercial $26,000 Lincoln St Locust St End of Street Commercial $38,000 71st Ave Hwy 99'X' Spruce St Commercial $43,000 Kahle Ln 72nd Ave End of Street Commercial $30,000 Crack Sealing/Naintenance $15,000 Commercial Total $549,000 17% North Dakota St 121 st Ave 115th Ave Residential $109,000 North Dakota St Tiedeman 114th. Residential $287,000 Greenfield Dr Gaarde Benchview Residential $80,000 Benchview Terr Greenfield Clearview Residential $11,000 Royalty Pk,xy- Naeve 400'S of l�lurdock Residential $119;000 Johnson St Hwy 99%' Grant Ave Residential $51,000 Grant Ave Johnson St Tigard St Residential $88,000 115th Ave Tigard St North Dakota St Residential $64,000 North Dakota 115th Ave St Cottonwood Residential $119,000 71 st Ave Spruce Pine Residential $34,000 Slurry Seals on Residential Streets $350,000 Crack Seals on residential streets $150,000 Residential Total $1,462,000 45% 2019 Total $3,224,000 141 Page Fiscal Year 2015 - 2019 1 Capital Improvement Plan Street System Page Project Project Name 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 5-Year Total y 25 95001 Pavement Management Program 1,900,000 1,950,000 2,025,000 2,100,006 2,170,000 10,145,000 Walnut Street Improvements 26 95023 (116th Avenue to 7fedeman Avenue 152,000 104,000 114,000 0 0 370,000 and I35th Avenue] 27 95027 Pedestrian and Cyclist Connections 0 0 384,000 338,000 138,000 660,000 Pacific Highway/Gaarde Street/ 28 95033 McDonald Street 305,000 400,000 0 0 0 705,000 Intersection Improvements r 29-30 95035 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street 1,561,350 0 0 0 0 1,561,350 1 Intersection 31 95037 92nd Avenue Sidewalk 4,000 0 0 0 0 4,000 (Waverly Drive to Cook Park) 32 95038 Tiedeman Avenue Sidewalk 0 0 0 167,000 598,000 765,000 (Tlgord Street to Greenburg Road] 33 95040 Tigard Transportation SDC 51,000 0 0 0 0 51,000 Upper Boones ferry Road/ 34 95041 Durham Road Adaptive Signal 115,000 0 0 0 0 115,000 Coordination Commercial Street Sidewalk and 3S-36 95042 Storm Detention facility 0 0 365,000 790,000 0 1,155,0(10 (Main Street to 3incofn Street] 37 95043 Hall Boulevard/McDonald Street 0 0 2,910,000 51990,000 0 8,900,000 Intersection Improvements ` 38 95044 Ash Avenue Design Application 0 440,000 0 0 0 440,000 (Raifroad Crossing) 39 45045 95th Avenue and North Dakota Street 234,000 0 0 0 0 234,000 Sidwalks40 97003 Main Street Green Street Retrofit 450,576 0 0 0 0 450,576 (Phase 1) 41 97fl17 Main Street Green Street Retrofit 0 0 0 825,000 365,576 1,190,576 (Phase 7) Total Funded 4,772,926 rrr 5,798,000 10,010,000 I oo� �o�a FfAe 1 NW f ' D{�� r r �,i � 1 1 2015 -2019 Capital Improvement Plan 23