Loading...
SLR2016-00001 SLR2O16 - 00001 Oak Street Estates No . 2 NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2016-00001 111 Viii OAK STREET ESTATES NO. 2 TIGARD 120 DAYS =June 3, 2016 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: Oak Street Estates No. 2 CASE NO.: Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) SLR2016-00001 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to excavate three utility trenches in sensitive lands (steep slopes of 25% or greater), in order to construct sanitary and storm sewer laterals that will serve an approved eight-lot subdivision, Oak Street Estates No. 2 (SUB2015-00011). APPLICANT: ReMax Equity Group APPLICANT'S AKS Engineering&Forestry Attn: Michael Biggi REPRESENTATIVE: Attn: Mimi Doukas 3825 SW Hall Boulevard 12965 SW Herman Road Beaverton, OR 97005 Suite 100 Tualatin,OR 97062 OWNER: Susan O. McGuire 6909 SW Oak Street Tigard,OR 97223 LOCATION: 6909 SW Oak Street WCTM 1S136AA,Tax Lot 400 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.775.070 SECTION II. DECISION rNotice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SLR2016-00001 Oak Street Estates No.2 1 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information: The project is located at 6909 SW Oak Street; north of SW Oak Street, south of SW Ventura Drive, and west of SW 69th Avenue. The northern end of the 1.87-acre property includes steep slopes of 25% or greater, while the remainder of the property is relatively flat. The site is zoned Low-Density Residential (R-4.5), as are surrounding properties. In November 2015, the City of Tigard Planning Division approved the site for an eight-lot subdivision, Oak Street Estates No. 2 (SUB2015-00011). Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to excavate three utility trenches in sensitive lands (steep slopes of 25% or greater), in order to construct sanitary and storm sewer laterals that will serve an approved eight-lot subdivision,Oak Street Estates No. 2 (SUB2015-00011). SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS ADMINISTRATIVE SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW Section 18.775.020.E.1 states that administrative sensitive lands permits in the 100-year floodplain, drainageway, slopes that are 25% or greater, and unstable ground shall be obtained from the appropriate community development division for the following: c. The director shall review minimal ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations involving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material, except in the floodway area by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030 subject to compliance with all of the standards in this chapter; This proposal is to excavate three utility trenches in sensitive lands (steep slopes of 25% or greater), in order to construct sanitary and storm sewer laterals. The applicant submitted earthwork calculations to demonstrate how this proposal will result in the disturbance of 48.5 cubic yards of material within steep slopes of 25% or greater. Since this proposal involves less than 50 cubic yards of material within sensitive lands, this review will be processed as a Type I procedure. APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.775.070 states that the appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit on slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title; This proposal complies with all applicable requirements of this tide, as demonstrated by the analysis contained within this administrative decision.Therefore,this criterion is met. 2. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; As shown in the submitted plans, the development in sensitive lands will not extend beyond the area required to excavate three utility trenches for new sanitary and sewer laterals. Both the applicant's narrative and plans indicate that less than 50 cubic yards of material within steep slopes (25% or greater) will be disturbed as a result of this project.Therefore,this criterion is met. SLR2016-00001 Oak Street Estates No.2 2 3. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; Clean Water Services (CWS) issued a Service Provider Letter (CWS file 15-000983) regarding this project. The agency included a condition for the applicant to obtain an erosion control permit prior to any ground disturbance. Accordingly, this project shall comply with the standards outlined in the CWS Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual. Furthermore, there is no evidence in the record to suggest this project will result in adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property. Therefore,this criterion is met. 4. The structures are appropriately sited and designed to ensure structural stability and proper drainage of foundation and crawl space areas for development with any of the following soil conditions: wet/high water table; high shrink-swell capability; compressible/organic; and shallow depth-to-bedrock; and The applicant submitted a geotechnical report that was prepared by GeoPacific Engineering, Inc. for this project. The report included an evaluation of subsurface conditions at the site, and provided geotechnical recommendations for site development: "The primary geotechnical issue for site development is the presence of steep slopes in the northern portion of the property. The rear footing-to-slope setback for the lots adjacent to the northern slope should be at least 10 feet horizontal;therefore,depth of embedment into native soils may be up to 5 feet vertical." Compliance with the geotechnical report's recommendations will help ensure proposed buildings are appropriately sited and designed for structural stability. The applicant submitted a preliminary plat and setbacks plan that incorporates the recommended rear footing-to-slope setback for lots adjacent to the northern slope. Accordingly, staff finds this criterion is met. 5. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening. The applicant's narrative states that any disturbed areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion, in accordance with the CWS Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual and TDC 18.745 Landscaping and Screening. Therefore, this criterion is met. FINDING: This proposal has been processed as an Administrative Sensitive Lands Review (Type I) for steep slopes of 25% or greater, and is in compliance with the applicable requirements of this Tide. SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Affected government agencies SLR2016-00001 Oak Street Estates No.2 3 Final Decision: This Administrative Sensitive Lands Review was processed as a Type I procedure. As such, the Director's decision is final on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. The Director's decision may not be appealed locally and is the final decision of the City. THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 9, 2016 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 10, 2016 Questions: If you have any questions,please contact Lina Smith at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCS@a,tigard-or.gov. February 9.2016 APPROVED BY: Lina Smith Assistant Planner SLR2016-00001 Oak Street Estates No.2 4 APPLICANT MATERIALS 41 City of Tigard _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ill TIGARD Sensitive Lands Review — Type I Application PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: REQUIRED SUBMITTAL Include reason for the Sensitive Land Review request: The permit is ELEMENTS necessary for the development of eight lots into single-family Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained,upon request,for all homes. Less than 50 cubic yards will be disturbed in steep slope types of Land Use Applications. areas for the installation of sanitary and storm sewer laterals. El owners Signature/Written / 6909 SW Oak Street, Tigard, OR Authorization Property Address/Location(s):: ® Title Transfer Instrument or Deed 97223 IXC Site/Plot Plan(2 copies) Tax map and tax lot #: Map 1 S 136AA,tax lot 400 IE Site/Plot Plan(reduced 81/2"x 1 l") Site size: 1.90 acres ® Grading Plan ® Landscaping Plan ® CWS Provider Letter APPLICANT: IX) Applicant's Statement/Narrative Name: Michael Biggi (2 copies) Address: 3875 SW Hall Blvd ® Filing Fee City/state: Beaverton,OR Zip: 97005 I uit • I \I I I ,H r)vL_v • Phone: 503-720-3734 Email: mikebiggi@equitygroup.com /� SLRCase No.: W w —°QOdI PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER(S)• 0 Same as Applicant Related Case Na(s):S U iS ?A7 I S - 00011 Name: Susan O. McGuire Application Fee: 71 G Address: 12650 SW 5th St. Application Accepted: City/state: Beaverton. OR Zip: 97005 By: M d Date: VII/i1.0 Phone: Email: Application Determined Complete: By LS Date: aiiiii( Comp Plan/Zone Designation:ji2-\7- -c Administrative Sensitive Lands Review Sensitive Lands Type: S/ /c7S/o Administrative sensitive lands permits shall be obtained for the following types of development. SA CURPLN ea "'•"'" 'ten, RN.03/9/2015 a. Installation of public support facilities. b. Repair reconstruction,or improvement of existing structure or utility, RE C F 1\JED less than 50 percent of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction except in the JAN 11 2016 floodway area. c. Paving on private property,except in the floodway area. CITY . tD PLANNING/ENGINEERING III City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of 2 • APPLICANTS To consider an application complete,you will need to submit all of the Required Submittal Elements as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained,upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above readiest does not violate a.y deed restrictio*s that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of applicant and each owner of the subject property required. KO, c, ( iApplicant's signature ( Print name Date 3o,j‘A YYl � 3 Lu1n(` amu..re_. ,a- l r G/i 5 Owner's signature Print name Date SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW—TYPE I APPLICATION City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • www.tigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 2 of 2 ' First American Customer Service Department N-: - 121 SW Morrison Street Suite 300-Portland,OR 97204 �_ epe Title Company of Oregon Phone:503.219.TRIO(8746)Fax:503.790.7872 T Email:cs.portland@firstam.com IIIToday's Date: 12/15/2015 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : McGuire Susan 0 Bldg# 1 Of 1 CoOwner : Ref Parcel Number: 1 S136AA 00400 Site Address : 6909 SW Oak St Tigard 97223 Parcel Number : R0277550 Mail Address : 12650 SW 5th St Beaverton Or 97005 T: 01S R: 01W S:36 Q: NE QQ: NE County : Washington (OR) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page Grid : Mkt Land : $675.300 Census Tract : 306.00 Block: 1 Mkt Structure : $27,010 Neighborhood :4TL7 Mkt Total : $702,310 School District :Tigard %Improved :4 Subdivision/Plat : M50AssdTotal : $156,390 Building Use : Single Family Res Levy Code : 02381 Land Use : 1910 Res,Potential Development,lmproved 15-16 Taxes : $2,614.94 Legal :ACRES 1.87 Millage Rate : 16.6286 Zoning : R-4.5 • • PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms :4 Year Built : 1930 Patio SqFt Bathrooms : 1.00 EffYearBlt : 1930 Deck SqFt : Heat Method : Forced BsmFin SF : ExtFinish :Wood Std Shtg Foundation : Concrete Ftg BsmUnfinSF : 1,020 Const Type :Wd Stud\shtg Lot Acres : 1.87 BldgSqFt : 2,310 Roof Shape : Gable Lot SqFt : 81,457 1stFIrSF : 1,020 Roof Matl : Comp Shingle Garage Type : UpperFlSF : Porch SqFt : Garage SF : Attic SqFt : 270 Paving Matl : l TRANSFER INFORMATION Owner Name(s) Sale Date Doc# Sale Price Deed Type Loan Amount Loan Type :McGuire Susan 0 11/06/2009 97383Personal Rep • • • • III This title information has been furnished,without charge. in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. N Reference Parcel #: 1 S136AA 00400 W , K s J ,J-,2 _ ,. ,: ,.., ,,,, _ 064 - h 28 29 0.' - a. 41, 12 , 'I! 3\,E¢. 6511 AC 66)]4 �J956'..,y f1r 125! 6=3� l' ,I�`'Jg3^/6-.21� J6.D0 )0.00 ]o D° -Y 100.00 az.00 )0500 Oo° -�' L` of 9 t �a - L',� 0 73 Ji 83 ��9y �'151000C w IP"' -S'Q,9 76.03 6500 2 S se '. I RIVE d rn c. 13 , 1slxsoo ' 'SffiOD I ''�' '¢ 1"0 o' a ,> i6lzsa�. _ n Ma 8 z100 8 Is lzsoo islzso0 0 1512500 woo sI° s,zso0 n .p3 136ti 33 °D ,a 6-e ?e• I .30 AC 14 15 16 a .509 1700 zw0 g1 zsoo g woo ?� ?, 'I 17 P 18 _R 19 g' 20 R' 21 01 SW & VENTURA PL gr. $I 151x50:"6. c'(� - • -I - I 9 q 6e D] 7000 -70.D3-�12A5 1 Q , 50.1. 6 27 ?s'•, C'7 C e3g�M.se m,00 I �a.00� I )o.Do MOO �( .7-' I - �'g's. I ':r 9' `s- r z4w V�&>>u 1rS a>v -b �_. 78.06 0 '9 1� ;Er° I 161zsoo 151x500 1 1412800 151250: \20, 1. _. _ ]0.00 64.D) 'P-. 1300 .& 17°0 7D � . mos A 54� b �4 / 38 =1 37 IEW 8' IsoO Nm - a>4!^-,,,,-7, 15.R'Q''"�'u-„ a- _ ...:SW TR"'. VENTURA .a - 36 =� 35 ,4 D9-2)-15W '1 8" a'; 51155. 2000-50935 0ti { ; fi 300°0 m1 8500 I 3. NaasDooE ' • h 10100 �+.� 850 nl 8400 i,I 7 ,-,VI'' it g q NORTH LINE 1HOMAS SCOTT DLC 63 7600 ` 7 TRACT-A-C - 6 4 a Jb 86800 '1 ''.,S .8 2800 I 2700 .62 AC, a'� I 1�] �1°y I seaaa-005 6 5 3, - -'4408-° 1v._n .____S _-e0m eon° y .� _ _ - °� -- 2900 1 ` Y _1 e° - ,1`..-,---- � 7 , 7'1� 10 532 R545 5'. Nl ilk m �m 870 c YY R-- ter,°. 9 ? 3000 S 10 4.3x.16 8200 I 0104 1 1, e I B m_ e996- 2! 10, 9000Ls a1 8800 i1O 880 �o { I I ::l _ .. ✓ 1\.:.z.....1.7f \ c 2 0 00 400 1, BO 8100 I �? )6660 17 6 I 312 3 -+-651. i 4' zp�-Slee 1.89 A•= I I 9 RI • 7200 �..,__; o , �°�° 2 3 B p�912 'v1 9200 Sc1 9300 cI 9400 ;,.I d � i 802 ^.'; 4a. /0 13 21 14 01 15 v1 16 301 I E 2 t' 1 Z26 AC 7310 8500 4..I.,,41 o ,,1 1_01_76 Y 85.00 84_.DI - SW } LOCUST ') ti STREET 1 .. 3300 C1 Z 64 8367-----`4*-‘ -'0'6.28 • 9 58.31---0 201 „ of W 5 20 .ee c1A- 61 14 P 1.,94 •.:',-• I 6.62 AC �... � Y 67 1 ta.°° ‘71, 7924 7 / 4 Z,,0000 9900 "�I 952 ;•1 2 3 8 1 -� ;000 j^ , ,;+ (n 22 e� 21 °i �� 17 3400 ,� 1 too H_�aao0 10200 Aoo 1 106.23 I I r6 6 T)JI,.$,- _ _ CJ �� y 702 $1 n 701 ` 839D -'F 180.00 _ oY3500 060601 a $i .34 AG = 9800 9700 m 962 ------ p 13 20 vu.o0 ' _- 120_05 • m i 79 �I tB I '9 2,, 1 I 1 300 a • 3600 62 1 .21 AC S -1 { ze 14 o ac q 75.00 700 100• 8 g`�>'�306 aQ`.- 'L. d:4.x°4.,,.1.I I y1 . • •- f--=z07D�4R I eis0 1 ♦---126x, ' I.'. I _- 174.05 -_��, i8 1005 & W r I LL -� i4,_, ;0 .17 AC ;1 D 7490 I I 8 302 8 D 2 8 3150 6831 1 3 )} Z I I$ 22 AC $i Ze1' .24 Ac 0 _ e1 I W 35.30 e _ 1' 1400 1 1 I - s m j LL 1002 3 .632 ma°? .43 AC o1 r`''',..'''"w"--! 6J '-'L >"1•-•a.-,,,,a15t''?', ••-tel 3800 • 10400 Q 21 AC miny 1 /� . 16 ' CO 20- 2 4 1000 1 1 3 0!54-_� 4. .17 AC _ 1 - -I? 2100 - _750>_ ?,$ 1500 a 392 c1 1 �+, -p ne 2 • 7s oo I SaP47,0E .44 AC 1 Iry }r..0 6 17 ¢•9� '1 3 - i 71 Y 63.50 - f est 0 1?. a ,a° 4B0 1 = 0 1001 1 0l .1 \) S.38:„,5.80 _ tw.o0 _ >. :(>10 /_ 26 O 0 1 f y 1007-oI I-,la '22'AC- woo!,\--�69, _ �; .'' 500 '%Nw'17 co9 C 'I h - T ---. 20.00 I- 112 r✓d'� '.?a+a 1 off 1 I 71 i_ ??7 n 6s_ -44 AC I'- R 2000 q� 19 0 d 4700�. . 75_ou �° 1 .1 I to I^ 2 25 12 •J DEED 0000080 --? q 162 '36 ,,"e u , #�os 5500 5° 1200 ' 5 j3. 4 ;0 4600 AC 6 1 p.� --� --- '? ! Y-- Au- 4226.I. ' .531 B 24 20 900 ° 1140 n ' �y 452 A _.60.00 _, 1 .26 AC $ „ .26 AC 0 10 1202 1300 \J • i , 12236 loo AC a or I- _. .22 AC .23 AC �H 1700 \ \. i 1800 I 3 1900 'eI �-__.__ 4 s, • X ✓ 4300 ul 2200 75_170 -'0,1 21 4400 .29 AC 0 5 75.00 4 35':is1 _i5- �A &) 1743 ' 8d' �$ 22 wo-2a ow '',g SW ,.-.i.....:50.00 • .. es 5.: +rFr.aF>1.2� .0.' )9 J00( °° - T OAK STREET . 2138) .' 1900 w -.--190.0 1 75.00 u0' :-,,,::0 -7ry "-`F- (CR n 1 1 r 1101 i 50' - - 150 •_ - 606.. --0.--1-- -0 •M I I 1 cyst American Customer Service Department • `4 '• 121 SW Morrison Street Suite 300 Portland,OR 97204 Title Company of Oregon Phone:503.219.TRI0(8746) Fax:503.790.7872 410 Email:cs.portland@firstam.com TI-IIS MAP IS PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE IN LOCATING PROPERTY. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF OREGON ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY VARIATIONS AS MAY BE DISCLOSED BY AN ACTUAL SURVEY N Reference Parcel #: 1S136AA 00400 W ` s r r ,, 15 20 0 21 2 3`� . . . ri. 56. 1 rJ N �o co r JJ --� co 44.58 b 70.00 •o 70.00 70.00 86.40 ��>� ° oN 16125D 0 p 76.00 0 70.00 _ 54.97 u-h 1800 SW • 'a3 38 VENTURA ti TRE" " 5 2000-50935 ti- �, 300 09 8500 '' N89-58-C 7 do 0 o o NORTH LINE THC 8600 0 0 0 8 i o�d 0 38 .-- .,- 7 :n c• ,� i� S88-48-OOE > > 80.00 w. 11131 / 80.00 it r , ,r, e 1• 1 ���' 870 4) i,!, �b.- 9 I cc 8800 �e°6, \10 i * 7 _ 11-.os 400 54.2064.88 'J' 1.89 AC 9300 Z 9400 --% 15 m 16 301 2.25 AC i _- 65.00 64.91 9 STREET 201 PJR o 41, 59.31 8.62 AC �P- epi P0O m 9100 ., , I 7 2 3 ,„... 8 1 .. 7 .. 3� '�5 10200 1:r. 44.05 a TR"8" o o w 6298 ~160.00 `-0 4 Aug .' c, Customer Service Department 0 •` '• TitleFrst American 121 SW Morrison Street Suite 300 Portland,OR 97204 Company of Oregon Phone:503.219.TRIO(8746) Fax:503.790.7872 :,-GEmail:cs.portland@firstam.com THIS MAP IS PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE IN LOCATING PROPERTY. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF OREGON ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY VARIATIONS AS MAY BE DISCLOSED BY AN ACTUAL SURVEY • Washington County,Oregon 2009-097383 11/08/2009 10:24:08 AM D-DPR Cnt=1 Stn=O C TOMPKINS $20.00$5.00$11.00$15.00$5.00-Total=556.00 II2IIIIII After Recording, Return to: III11IIIII III1 IIII II lii' /(�r,��J��rrr///����JJJf Ms Susan O. McGuire 014242782009009738300400042 , 6 9 0 9 SW Oak S t I,Richard Hobernlcht Director of Assessment and - —C_ J Taxation and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington Tigard, OR 97223 County,Oregon,do hereby certify that the within _, Instrument of writing was received and recorded In the book of records of said coup " Send All Tax Statements to: Richard HoDernieht.Director of Assessment and Taxation.Ex-Officio County Clerk "- - Ms. Susan 0. McGuire 6909 SW Oak St Tigard, OR 97223 PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED Susan 0. McGuire, Personal Representative for the Estate of James E. McGuire, deceased (Washington County Probate case #C09- 0059PE) , Grantor, and pursuant to the Order Allowing Verified Statement and Judgment of Final Distribution, hereby grants and conveys to Susan 0. McGuire all right, title, and interest in the following described real property, situated in Washington County, commonly known as 6909 SW Oak St . , Tigard, OR 97223 , and more particularly described as follows, to wit : SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED AND FULLY INCORPORATED HEREIN. The true consideration for this conveyance is $NONE. This conveyance is made pursuant to a Final Judgment of Distribution in the above stated probate case. • Dated this November 5, 2009 . NOTICE: THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS OR LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30 . 930 . By ( f l V.�r Susan O. McGuire, Personal Representative STATE OF OREGON, County of Washington ) ss . Personally appeared the above named Susan O. McGuire, the duly appointed Personal Representative for the estate of James E. McGuire, this November 5, 2009, and acknowledged the foregoing y act a d d before me. t . OFFICIAL SEAL J �'a JOHN M ELLIOTT4711 `.,'�, NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON f �,,,or COMMISSION NO.439165 0Not ry Public of Oregon MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 28,2013 My Commission Expires: Page - 1 PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE' S DEED EXHIBIT A w All'`o the NortbE 5I4l, feat of-t� e t`o1To�iir • deseribeci trcct o land to`=:t�.t= T e Weet ecz e n the :'aas,v ,8 cr � oat1_ - 7.ow41g-- cri ted `fi acw -ot land, to i4, t". 1 e inning at a-point ora _thee Nortm;:line =of Section 35;, T, 1 S. -R . 1 il., of.._the V;._ S. lo,908 :-chains blestt of :tine Northeast col- 01-.6 or- ner: nt 6 fid ,s;40t-3ian thence-ir ming Soutrh 16.50 chains to c k: North -aide .linea pt;the 314 :acres :tract-soxtried by Agnes BurrougnL thence ranx►ing:We t la;332'chains along the North ?ire of sci 34 acre tract to .the:.;Nortbweet .corner thereof; thence rune nc North 16.50 chains to:the =Borth .line of said Section 36; thar:c running. East .along the North line of said Section 36; 13. 332 chains to the place of beginning,, containing 22 acres more less. Excepting a strip of land 10 feet wide along the WeEt • side deeded to the Public as described in Deed Book 127 Page L2, in Washington County, State 'of Oregon. • • , +.47 1 c .1' Pr` - r :e ..Li 1 ';:2-!....',..,--421'411-'.4C.,-, :4 'L ;''','0'3.2.,.,:..:1,-," r:g • 7,....,•',..,,,„....-`t R t.. S f f, �,,'-uCi F> L.� T JS.v; � s:- W, ,7" i • ' `. , CERTIFICATION OF VITAL RECORD y , < SCS E > :;<-7,1:C . )".-„. ...e I / Via„".l u � hl\ Sr~ :- - a 1. a TYPE OH PERMANENT t 36 25 30 -1 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES BLACK INK HEALTH DIVISION D TAG NO. CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS r- 0 3-0 2 014 2 9 E14 5 014 -I CERTIFICATE OF DEATH 136- Fde Nweb..I State File Number i . NTS IrA3/NOME Mdl. MUN c2 SEX 3.DATE OF DEATH(MAN.Dy.Yey1- llaiiiJames Edward ricGUIRE Jr. Male September 2, 2003 ..SOCIAL SECUAITT NUMBER.s..AGE-LY B.edry- 55.Undo 1 Year Sc IkN..t Dry 6 BIRTHPLACE(Gy and SUM or Fo ga 7.DATE OF BIRH(Weal Dy.Yea,) 505-16-4121 Ir'�( 90 '�` %°syt """` '"` mplariat. NE April 4> 1913 a WAS DECEDENT EVER YII 9/.rtACE OEDEATH/�.CAmyorl __--.-.- .._U.SJBMEnFORCES'--IT`,ca;T1.""----_.-_- -.---.- � Y]Y.. OIL) Q•IP+we .3 E JOVI).Eer. 0 o IN Wrung Hem. D D•oplanrs lama 3 012w e 1b FAGI/TY•NAME/S not assaiv or;+Rawl IIIndlvrcer/ 96 CRY.TOWN.OR LOCATION OF DEATH 9a COUNTY OF DEATH T 30 West Hills Health & Rehab. Portland Multnomah ta DECEDENTS USUAL OCCUPATION 19e.KIND OF BUSPIES$ANWSTRY 11.MARTIN.STATUS•Mar a4 TI SPOUSE ATMANNA INala.D •1 2 ((fGI ASM.4.enrAra6.e moat of waive re. NnaMwmS,WletwoC. DoDBLmee, 61 pwl./Isyadry) 3 Maintenance Engineer Foundry Industry Widowed Lee McGuire 4 13..PESIDEraM STATE :3e.COUNTY 19c.CRY,T OWN OR LOCATION 13d STREET AND NR.NER • i//�{��•��j 1 Oregon Washington Tigard m 6909 SW Oak Street 5 `/•/1 ,37.1450E CITY 131 211 CODE 14 WAS DECEDENT OF HISPANG MOW 15 RACE Amnon Incise_ 16.DECEDENTS EDUCATION LIMITS, /50d2y No a Yes-11 yes.nosey Uawe. BMack.Wale. 61.(SP..M) (Se.ar oda(9114 4'.S....floe.* 6 _ Merman P.m Rene ole.)19 No C3 TM EMmrMary5mo/dnY 10-121 I CMM9.(1-A o5.) ®Yea DIM 97223 spn''x White 12 1 17.FATTER-NAME four nista IRR la MOTHER-NAM6 NM mole Maden r19.INFORMANT-NAME aid relmmvap vs d.raaa0 ;r James E. McGuire Sr. Flossie - McMulle:i Susan McGuire, Daughter 20a.METHOD OF DISPOSITION 0 Mrtidern 200.�� T DISPOSON(Mama of crawler).n.^uary.or 20c LOCATION-City or Torn an Tn.S -:'• Qaum. ®Ctenswo ORe waw Km,sole 7 CI(beam l3Oese ISPs+)) Aloha Crematory Aloha, Oregon - 21.SIGNATURE OF OREGON FUNERAL SERWCE LICENSEE OR 210.OREGON LICENSE NO. 21P OF B l E- pERSGY (OrLan.ee) 2i NAu wpn luneral3 b Cremations /rl"/ 2C 12 .i9 SW Witt i w Drive 3 CO 3163 Tzgard, OR 972Z4-0701 _C STRAP 23 DATE FILED(Mona Ory.Year) 24.REGISTRAR 5 RE • SEP 11 2003 eRESERVED FGR REGISTRARS USE 10_1/L . cEaslg prslcw+ - • 11 / , 2T.TIME CF DEATH 21 WAS MEDIC.1 EXAMINER NOTMEtts 311.TATE OF DEATH 310.DATE PRONOUNCED DEAD(MANN DAN rev.(bo) III3:30 P M ❑Ys <No /t M M �`:-m.To ifr 0..101 my. imp nc r INK 1m++e.gan:rwce and 32-On Me oasts d wanmaeon zmwor vw•nbjance,it my ap,.m Death occurred • CE•ir r-AER '`.:(b Marty I ' -` / O.' (smp,srweal the i M.,Pecs and Mete Pm muse(s)aro manner soled. _ 12 90.DATE SCINEO(ROM,�y.1N.' Y'W ' 33 DATE SIGNED(Monro.per.,NalCOOHTY 13 34 NAME.TRIES ADDRESS AND ZIP OF CERTIFIER/MEDICAL� NER ITyyoP,mp • 14 _ilA Neal Allan Dunitz, MD 2525 SW Patton Road Portland, OR 97201 • C.ONOATIONS j.35 NAME OF ATTENDING PHYSICIAN O OTHER THAN CERTIFIER(Typed Pant( O ANI• 10404 GAVE Mtenr/belw•e..r or..... RISE TO 30.14114;)CRATE CAUSE(ENTER OPAL Y CAUSE PER LINE FOR(A).(e(.AND ICI 1 Oa not enter 0040 al Sry'D,e D C.a•Snr a Rospuyp y Anew e.Mn STATING THE •:PMT 101 � _Y Inlmrd.Meen cn..1 UMOERI YAVG T{/" WE TO,O�AS A C SEQUENCE OF ir10 dlalh AUSE LAST •' it DUE TO.OR AS •- OUE/• Of IrmoeMYN / iiiii lc) 24-3,4.rTG Ara r.&oo -�N 747••••,.. • • • .'PART OTHER SIGNIFICANT CONDITIONS 37.0-.d IAMWN We cdnO . 36 AUTOPSY�p F YES we ED4.�senmd R COnda....ceruaann9l0 death NA nu...e,on the edenyn9 cause wen n PART I M146 dea111T nS,I.,.ww,g aootrwk' 75 D Mea A1��/ /✓Ifte!- !/[/C/9i /or/ Ora Oumnown pros Bl Nu ❑v.,O54�'N,A 16 .0.MANNER OF DEATH TE OF IAUURIF.Ie.TIES OF Its.K11URY X415.DESGiME HOW NJ/RY OCd1RREO fL1b1T.DaY revJ OLAFIY AT NT /� Fi wwM O Pwgrmg �/7' DiAfodwe lmfnp9nlUn �//1 Q Legg rmneS 091//4 . ypn�y1 M ❑Y.s D No Cllr LOCA7IjtN(»M/�I/,wld ONNe000.RuHI50180 NuMbw.Gly o Town.Siam) ❑HpNpd. Q^egal Al'i.PLbuildi y nc. ya�A m� ary�p��bmlar.l `T/ V USE OF CODFAI Q o.y.r tone., v /^� {I )INSTRUCTIONS RESERVED FOR REGISTRAR'S USE DN REVERSE SCE OF GREEN ANO ." FMK COPY _ • ORIGINAL-VITAL STATISTICS COPY 43-2M,130o) +gii p F 04::y - E ,,, y �F( I CERTIFYTHATTHIS IS ATRUE,FULL AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE ON FILE OR THE VITAL ;� ,� T-(j ��� !is`��If('y RECORD FACTS ON FILE IN THE VITAL RECORDS UNIT OF THE OREGON CENTER F R HEA/LTHOLSTTAATIIS/TICS. °1K a$ `� !)V � 9N FEB 2 OO JEN FE A.WOODWARD,Ph.D. y.. ` IUYWyw J .S•: • I DATE ISSUED - STATE REGISTRAR Asa ) 4s 4, j THIS COPY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT INTAGLIO STATE SEAL AND BORDER Y r; - 4 - I(1\11, - 1• .mT r-, • .._ .."--r.-,", 1 -..--/,,''',.:.- r `.4C°',...h ti i\ SFPVs► 1 -. AW,•.N9n11luN Nr. . . •.,N...19°- --*4:14iTV ,`4ea.-�1 �� 3�u.b,t�dl 'B!.a�/��abj1� ..11��`� �.,b-.r,.'�x�Fia +`ti@ 4r �' ? y,;,, �'t'l y"f?��;s.�T: 1Ib CERTIFICATION OF VITAL RECORD 3 PRINT OREGON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ,: 6L CK NKM r 335657 HEALTH DIVISION `. 1.0.TAG No. CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS Ai L3 CERTIFICATE OF DEATH 1136- 1r Stale Fie Number1 Local Fin Number 3.OATS OF DEATH AVMA Dry.Y«^ `, DECEDENT'S Faa MMOM Lau i SFJ g. NAME Ellen McGUIRE FPma1e flrtr r 31, JOl0 `*0 Lee T 7 Yr., A.SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER L.AGE{acl Blrerea? So.IAre.r 1 saw Sc,Liman 1 M R.OIR7WryUCE rCaF AM�•�FO^IPn .DATE OR FIFTH IM.ArR f?ry. y' Y rY«r.l M... :D." rou^ 'uw' ylTntpl Hp* R�rin9s Sept. 29, 1915 1L;. 542-10-6999 BS as.PLACE OF DEATH(CR r.h am/ S.WAS DECEDENT EVER 04 Rev. O Dem ISy.ri✓J -;DECEDENT L S AIMED FORCES? l 0 IrrpallaN 0 Ewc.o...N 0 DOA raga 0 Nwrq Herm Mn -"c ❑Y« TV Na li YJ.COUNTY OF OEATH N mower ,J 9c,CITY.TOWN.DR LOCATION OP DEATH .L. aa.FACILITY NAME M n.I.uaRaen.P`� Wy5}1 i nrJtr7n -' 1 6909 SW Oak Street Tigard .,_W,, IW.KIND OF FUSNESSANOUSTRY 111.MARITA_STATUS-MoomAl l2 SPOUSE(✓«a^ 10..DECEDENT'S USUAL OCCUPATION W.+r.4n..G Warred. <'4? 17 glYd er.ora ow Moog swot co boa.,14. Memo]M00%) • 2 pp.bra swell • 3 Homemaker OYJn Horne Married James ,^ 13.RETICENCE•STATE nib COUNTY I3.WY.TQNNOR LOCATION ITd-STREET END NM ISER ° Or Washington ,Tigard 6909 SW Street :5 Oregon 11 s .cE,T.r��a•ti �,DEcsDENrc mJUTaN rk - 5 -.a '-'ae:Tr I is.TO:ODE WAS tEyr.NT OP HISPANIC ORIGIN?. (yWcn.w�. r' -.-. .A41.S^._ AT'.1PCI 11AIT5? IM yr.P r a P-f w. Ne O Tr }ENnwNarYSw°rAbM Io-10` Co..P n.•e,5 I . IRr,aon Pura RCM.c1 Xj I 12 I 6 )(j Y.ONO 97223 °A.ATr. White` 1Y.IMFORMANE••NAME and imam-WV 0 tlec15 1 S IAM II.MOTHER-NAME 1UN mmeb a' a `V 1?.FATHER-NAME i- . nMal. Jameslire, Husband 'A • vAIEN[s Delbert - .Lane pPearl - Bishop :; Too,PLACE fro..ervurr.ry ,r'rnc'e'r,or Mc LOCATION.Cr r Ta.Y,.SYN • zoA METN�D�FFD..�t//DF�'�D��LS''P'��D��wT,DN ow.ra.Iar, J x .DISPOSITION 09s0111LOrr.en�aa^❑R.nra,.lMre WY Tigard, Oregon 0 DoOOE 1 0OP.r FSP.eT4_�-- Young's Crematory I fib.OREGON LOENSE NO. EE NAME•ADDRESS AND VP OF FACAJTY. 91a-SIGNATURE OP MEO(a FIINERAI iFiNCE LJCWilE OR • PEnwNACTWG AS MACH IO/Lbaa.J YOUnCJ'B Funeral Home ;191 8 'Pi �? s . �_J/. � 3482 71831 SW Pacific Hwv Ti q 97223 [L7�i �`GLEDNo ""Z¢l 2 2000 =.:,,E TwjE//��/E,�all+///q/pE/,�/� 8 S].DATE FY-ED fAbIW DaY.Yoh Nov 0 /^�•/"`^�`� 0 pEGISTRRR • .• 5 RESERVED FOR REGISTRAR'S USE .TO BE COMPLETED ONLY!iY MEDI:AL c)-A1 tiER a 10 TO BE COMPLETED BY CERTIFYING PHYSICIAN a TNJEOFoEwTN If1a.DATE PRor+ouNCED DEAD 11�,,.Oer,v..r.NRI S7.TIME OF DEAN [a.WAS MEDICAL EXAW/QRNpnFIED/ P. 11 )00.' • M . j• 7.09 am u.Drl W•sera a.«aor ;.clue to v Y.M.Cs)ma mY nnerwn w]. a«v, • r 1 M a1M.eaM.aaa arb M Y e,....Cs)mad manner Maw].�•lu• ebM d ...ybDrlagla.! I ��✓� // .Plan. Fr`: '/ 'r ey p.DATE SIGNED Rainy.D.Y.Y•srl COUNTY •��: 30 DATED . • .Y.FT , oa A�Ri 1 3 34.NAME,TTO.E.ADDRESS AND ZIP OFyCRTIFIEJWIDICAI PL MMYER arm w 0,04) I 14 David VanSickle. M.D. 6475 RMA Rrrr•1Arrl Rr9 Rids, r. 7,rla1n1-1n r*,-rym 47f1(T2 CONDITIONS ]S.NAME OF AT-ENOINO PHYSICIAN IF OTHER?IAN CERTIFIER(TjP+or NbW • IF ANY F rr_ry Arnal. eaa r beN.l.n areal Ffi VIIRIS CAVE AONLY CA br PER LFJ FOR gal,gr.AN IN D a^�-Pf G / yJ� �✓ CAUSE Ni YAI.lED1ATE GV`�X-�'r Y J�[ rJ(ypj���a/1/hU/( M - IRM.EDM7E PART (/ /� /fl/I �Ir.l.rval 0inemn n CAUSE I Sal r STAT THE DUE TO,ORA COHSE ENC O 4/,v// : :II CCALVINGj�lj .?�in 1i dtr�� � ��Y1l ^L- ..... :-_:.. { Ic1 x(11 Jr it E f-/r"r----A."' ' V � l `T b Ebu `O'rr'a�o..In DUE TO.�AtA ONS ENCE OF'. L} IFI 31 Dd lobs.*ur arr.., 3e.AUTOPSY n.[1ESw.yd.,...., �j rE • PART IO Or.6aarr? Yrre+Y*mala.rRI OTHER SIGNIFICANT CONDITIONS- N PAP?I. II Crabbers eaur4buo^a w.MY aW Rol n uARIa,F W WaPY•V mos.•loon 0 Yu ❑P�.� t 5 ,�/ ilv 0 NO ,W, /�'a_'_' O Y.,XYr+o 0 Y«O Na DRI. //.. ��OA AS/ . RIO.WJURY /1a DESCRIBE HOW INJl111x OCCURPED ,F ta.DA OP' 'Y 110.TIME OF C - _ 16 a0.MANNER OF DEATH PAmb Ory,nal INJURY AT WOPII? - X1 Nolo.] CPIEART 17• ❑AGAa.rl 0 U made M 0 Yr 0 NO 111.LOCAITON(Sv.al w...mew e•Purr worn.NMr�a...CII*w Ta+t SUM) • • 0~No Ural /1 a RACE OP INJURY-Y 1•Tona.Mau abort.IWry.enln ❑~No. ❑Ural41,.. b�iQ.q..lc(SPaINrJ _1 wn GUSE 0,DEATH O Olnor `,� STRJLTM3e3 RESERVED FOR REGISTRAR'S USE l�it� - ,..:;,,,Er, N IIEYEA1K OOE r, CO DAEENAC - COPY F 43-7-Roo 1300: noir: -VITAL STATISTICS COPY 14 11A1 • `q�ptagUt111»IIII �`pyo f111N1'r�y»IIIpUpJrJ 4 --•;`-'1.....--�� �, THIS ISA TRUE AND EXACT REPRODUCTION OF THE DOCUMENT OFFICIALLY PO 1•7 •-r.: a1 •' $,4 REGISTERED AT THE OFFICE OF THE WASHINGTON COUNTY RE R. urs ��� f1,'':z I.• • �� ( + '�7(� CO TY REGISTRAR ,} Y( O` r c DATE ISSUED. �11i Q P. (� [-``Lt=' WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON .• T VALID WITHOUT r AGLIO STATE SEAL'ANO BORDER �rrJ//,/i�A'r ...0° 44'1P'.- THIS COPY NO oar.• r,T,-a---'0.�x4..sx�T7' Ino -fir I I IIIOIII 1r.. ...A '• colo,,_-'RY` - . N W W¢ U I- ¢F U le U OAK STREET ESTATES NO . 2 CITY °FTIGAR° =o Approved by PI Ening RC 11111 $ W J PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PLANS Date: / yQ Initials: L_S 1,1g Z . =neo W �, <n'R f =W Y -.vii v4 I C7 Q `E4 g o E2 IUJ c SW Y!1lfUWA flmw (-- LCL g APPLICANT O W a�eox smear n,cZ BW OC � PROh—PROJECT 1160BIGG15SWCONSTRUCTION LN 0UST �, TRACT B WILSONVILLE OR 97070 ; NEET 011 ® 7 WI Wo3 sW�.b a,Be� / 6 CIVIL ENGINEERING/SURVEYING/NATURAL W m BW OAK smeeT 2 $ L I z RESOURCE/PLANNING/ARBORIST/LANDSCAPE W N � ' > — q ; ARCHITECTURE FIRM CC N 5 /TRACT A AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC. s U) d SW wee STREET �- SW 69TH AVENUE CONTACT: MIMI DOUKAS, AICP, RLA P��'o _ _ _______- .______ I 12965 SW HERMAN ROAD, SUITE 100 / TUALATIN, OR 97062 Z rIP's' Q5� - - \:\.-- -00"° y PH: 503-563-6151 0CC 44 / FAX: 503-563-6152 `�a Qg 5's°'` SITE MAP C7 1"-100' ~ VICINITY MAP • NOT TO SCALE LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED I•- Q DECIDUOUS TREE O 0STORM SEVER CLEAN OUT c CONIFEROUS TREE -3:(-- .3k.. STS SEW DATAHDRMN o SHEET INDEX FRE HYDRANT A A STORY SEWER MANHOLE ® T� P01 - COVER SHEET WITH VICINITY SITE MAP j W WATERi— BLOWOFF U 1 GAS METER ® 0 WATER METER o a GAS VALVE m O P02 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN LU vi WATER VALVE mF. GUY ERE ANCHOR P03 - PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SETBACKS PLAN PROJECT LOCATION: 6909 SW OAK STREET 2 DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ® a POWER POU • TIGARD, OR 97223 Cl) MR RELEASE VALVE ,r of POWER VAULT © PO4 - PRELIMINARY DEMOLITION PLAN I— CC SANTATY SEWER DEAN OUT ° • POKER DEMON BOK o P05 - PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL PLAN AND TABLE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: TAX LOT 400 (WASHINGTON COUNTY w Z SANITARY DEERE MANHOLE o • POWER PEDESTAL P06 - PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN SIGN -,- T caYxuNlcAnONs VAULT Cl ASSESSOR'S MAP 1S 1 36AC) LOCATED IN > SIRnLr uGHr c o aTMMONICAnaNS NUNcnaN BOX • P07 - PRELIMINARY STREET PLAN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 36, O V MMLROK ® COAWNICADONS RI ER • TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, P08 - PRELIMINARY STREET PROFILES WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON V EXISTING PROPOSED P09 - PRELIMINARY COMPOSITE UTILITIES COUNTY, OREGON RIGHT-of-WAV UNE - - - - - - -- P10 - PRELIMINARY SITE TREE CANOPY PLAN EXISTING LAND USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPERTY UNE P11 - CONCEPTUAL FUTURE STREET CONNECTIVITY PLAN PROPERTY UNE PROJECT PURPOSE: SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL 8 CEN7muNE - - LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE R-4.5 DISTRICT RESIGNED BY SRP DUTCH DATUM: DRAWN BY SRP CURB ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON HOLDING CHECKED BY ANIi EDGE OF PAVEMENT WASHINGTON COUNTY BENCHMARK 82D SCALE AS NOTED EASEMENT - - ALSO STAMPED "CITY OF PORTLAND DATE 9/03/2015 FENCE UNE • B44181" LOCATED IN A MONUMENT BOX ` 9 ;;4 AT THE INTERSECTION OF SW TAYLORS �' '->'' GRAVEL EDGE FERRY ROAD AND SW 65TH AVEUNE. �..�.,Ot G�� POWER UNE - '• ELEVATION OF BENCHMARK IS 480.60'. IRE •• •«' COMMUNICARONS UNE cu m, !+� OVERHEAD WJ�� �ER H. 110 FIBER OPOC UNE - - --°"- -- -�- —0^'—W.: W,:— RENEWAL DATE:6/50/17RASNS GAS UNE STORM SEWER UNE ••- - - --- •• WW SANITARY SEWER UNE - - - -F. - - ->..- W •• JOB NUMBER - 4294 UNE - - - --*- - - - •� ••, ••, 4294 SHEET Pal MM¢ v CITY OF TIGARD Approved by Ian Ing Le I o.. • u , , It. RIM:,294. 1 ' Date: V � � IA IE OUT:295.38(12•S) `� o 1 I 1 1 SUMP:294.12 W r 00 12 1p0 V � n V. • o"s gi ,�1 1 ,1 TAX LOT 9100 J I // I n ltia 1pjT 97nn L--- J i m ) 1 o TAX MAP 1S 1 3606 A, >G S a \ 1 LOT 13 J TAX MAP 1S 1 250D r 5 1 a ` TAX LOT 8400 � aQ w , / = TAX MAP IS 1 3606 I LOT 13 q.:I; e eg ,I- \ 1 1 _ • / \ LOT 6 t5 N Ji W ROCK RETAINING WALL 7 I\ \m, ( 4. V q, • ISTORM �i 6 W PER AS BERALULTS Y r ( 1 `-g00 PUE / \ .f i' i 1.,. I �.'?:1. 6.,,,A o TAX LOT 9800 PERNr�'�L \---, 1 A 1 I N ( 'I TAX LOT 2300 Z TAX MAP 1S 1 36AA \ 1 1'= I..=.'a TAX LOT 9200 1 1 -- ,06,9 TAX MAP 1S,2500 LOT 20 ROCK RETAINING WALL J� I 1 1 TAX MAP OT 14 36AA I 1 1 1 1 LOT 14 Y/ O TAX LOT 9900 > \ ' , 1 ( V TAX MAP IS 1 3606 I r I W' Lor 21 pO S307066 N IC .31 '< i II 11 I 10.00 / TAX LOT 8500 10555 ti* r ,,� W IE 2 297.49(6•S) N1 , r \ TAX NAP ISi 36M c�a I 0 IE IN:291.87(I8"E) 1 g' t 1 f> LOT 7 I a Z IE OUT: 291.69(18'W( ' 1 , I 1 { 1.- / 10552 1 41 Q ROCK RETAINING WALL I II 1 • (!" I \ - / 20)0' 25.00' I0 TAX LOT 9700 PUBLIC SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT�G =• I' 1 TAX MAP IS 1 3606 STORM LATERAL II TAX LOT 9300 -r- -10,00' KEYSTONE �' ° TAX LOT 2400 CO" Cl) LOT 19 TAX LOT 10200 PER As-BUIL,S >_ �� I > `1 TAX MAP IS 1 360 1 RETAINING WALL II TAX NAP 1S 1 2500 `> ca TAX NAP iS 1360 - 3 I ; LOT 15 ( LOT 15 W TRACT B EX STM AD ___, - iPP I SAN LATERAL ( TAX LOT 8800 10547 I> 1 Ca ; RM:305.31 I PER AS-GUILTS I TAX MAP 151 3606 TAX LOT 8600 W CO E OUT: 303.63(LYNCH) , I 1- E%ST MH �# LOT 10 TAX MAP 15 1 3606 10544 I IM: 250.56 Sl1YP.302.01 - RM. 307.62 I LOT 8 i G I IE IN:243.35(4-S) PUBLIC SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT) 1� •~� IE IN'. 300.08(12'E) r' 4 I IE OUT,243.16(6'IY) W ROCK RETAINMG WALL I. I IE IN: 300.18(8"S) u E%STM MH I s: , I IE OUT:299.85(12"W) I RIM: 248.95 10541 10658 a.00'PDE--, �i - I m TAX LOT 8700 " TAX LOT 2500 I TAX MAP 1S 1 3606 IE IN:238.60(151) •{- I N IE IN: 24L55(15"E) 10578TAX MAP 1S 1 2560 TAX LOT 9600 _E' TAX LOT 9500 \ I1 0 15.00' I, TAX LOT 9400 y i 2000'PUBLC SANITARY SEWER LOT 9 IE IN, 238.50 E M 24492 DONE) II)LICEI TAX MAP 94 DT 181 3600 TAX MAP IS 13600 aeo' I Inil I>• I RIMST X240 LOT 16 O TAX MM 1S 13606 s LOT 16 1 EASEMENT AND 20.00'PRIVATE E OUT:237.96(12-N) hI I v g A. STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT 10533 I I IE OUT 246.10(101E) BRICK RETAINING WALL LOT 17 I SAN LATERAL SU11P. 244.91 SAp :P 10169 I N89'33'01'W 10.00' 10418e lig 0 6000 FENCE + W000 FENCE PER AS GUILTS 7 101 8 10167 FENCES304 - 10457 41 �p I ROCK WALL - - - - -- DECK - u. - - N f 813 .1 .. 1" - - - - - - - - / T 3 / 00 2� . 10646 IV - - - - - - I \ GRAVEL i\... BARRICADE. ...40120 ' N00`26'.59•E 462.46' 1O1 \ WIRE F} CE \ -� \\ / x10462 Ig •s I L \ HOUSE / Q -- - __ A �� \ \ / ?9oalyo"fig I / r� / o 10009 RE FENCE ' '; \ RID EA9T5 8 ) 1Q303© \\� z)0 5 � V < �`\•�- a4 .. W�g�. % MH 1\1\1 \ \ \ 40 104166 v 1 `RR RE $ I ( E%ST CO �� IM 207 \ \ \\\\ ,, tel% ,{y n _ t, \- m-:r- [ _ \�'.mr RETAINING 10006 'o RIM.3113 I. 1 (8-111) �!i�) , --""• I 1` V 1?- \�\�����\y I WALL 1 IE OUT:3041 1 "\4 1 ��J X ,--Z.))---_"-----).--•-- 22,3"..\7� 1 g HOUSE (LOCATION AND ELEVATIONS4± I y, I 1 \ 10360*\ V�� ,,,§), 1 S �����111111������ I I r„,,,. "w RR RE STEPS 0 t\ 1 PER ASBLIILTS-COULD NOT , '� \ � 1 $241 • / 'g1,,y� EZ ST CB ..f, FIELD LOCATE) J - �. V A '• I IOj54� 1 2 1 I 1 1 RIM-248.20 HOUSE i � ; \ • I,.,JpS ` \ tb328� I ;/10397 /a0`�5 tig0' IE WT 24475(151N) TAX LOT 2600 TAX LOT 302 TAX LOT 300 , 1 ` 1 ,D5 I � Tos26(pJ SUMP 244.75 TAX MIP 15 1 2500 N • X14 ......_._ • TAX MM 1Si 3606 TAX MAP IS 1 3600 1• 11 }0018 \ 'EASEMEN PER DOC. �\ TA'AX MIP`iS 1760000 A� \ Io 10327 Q�` (0�j�,I / /� 2SOI�YT _ EX ST AD LOT 17 Z Q GNA•..• • C'v ��/ 481 I "(1- RIM:247.42 QQ IE OUT:243,62(18.1460 SHED;] ) \ N0.2009-035261 SANITARY SEVER�� � ..: Pv / / r ..„/ _ Ifl503 �' EX STY MH I \ �0V07n9 0 .........-,, • 100980 L•1g23/•{ 1*j I / / � RIM: 328.89 t" I I I� '7078* . �-poilER YETER',' 1 I 102r ' .I I ( o I <i (/ /1039340\ 4( i Q E IN: 322.99(12'S) ; 10019 \ 0 1 1 1 :149:341at„11 I IE IN:324.59(4-E) 50002 . \ O I \ IA \10081 \ �IN �2 0 \ 0 5� IE OUT: 322.79(12•N) 8 \�^ \ - HOUSE _,,rr v�- - - - 1 \ E%ST MH / I ,`3 \ _10364 i) 1 255 Q- - - 500 1 \ I\ RIM: 312.11 \ ./ \6 . i FSTANDING '�` \ \ 1 •7,'a /• 1 - TAX LOT 0 J IE IN. 306.61(10'SE) • • I WATER \10274 0372 03: 10389 /� _____-_�__ _ "' " ( I \ IE IN:305.31(12 S) �\ \ 1026 \�� ; 3(�Q )\ \ - 2700 (� Li _ _ �J ( ) O \ v \ \ \, ` I E%SAN MH TAX MAP 15 1 2500 �/ If OUT 305.11 12"NE \ 100➢I� - WIRE FENCE 1 10048 1 �� \ 31593 \ 15A7 1 I 1 310555000003 c163 3 1,65�J 5 63, ,) : 1 z r 1 0 1 _ MIRE FENCE V /y `1F1}Z_ 31b544,-..)31,00...,..t, ) "233(71\ EIXN:225923(EFS) LOT 18 �__� � __ __ `_ - _ _ l"J - 0 31059/ ( 3168 1� - 1 - 1 - ■ -----.194.2.83.7-L5: 2' L 31598 �1396_031s97 JA 1061 \®31164 \ IE OUT:257.50(8'N) a-I SW 6 AVENUE \ - - _,.....q_ _ _ n� _ -� _- `=�+- cn EX ST MH O - - - - \ 31Q6J O C)3 : v_ 8'CONIC'" _ 1167 RIM:33429 - E%SAN.4 -1,- . Ir• --.-TM- • \ "� I r•- IE OUT:728.49(12'N) \y,�, RIM:327.47 - E%SAN YH' r -� \ �� \ 0 31166 1 1' • �pr- E IN:32033(8•S) 1- NI,317.26 IL - 4j �" I Lu lLLlfJJI \ 1500 WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT SAN MH E OUT: 320.22(81N) IE M:294.65(18'N) 1 EX SAN MH I "" FOR THE BENEFIT OF MERCER RIM:296.32 I 3 I - T---r j - 1- E IN: 308.05(8'S) .... -` RIM: 312.03 1► SANITARY DISTRICT(CLEAN WATER IE IN: 29032(8"S) \, --1 _1 TAX (')T I I I\ I 1 I IE OUT: 294.16 1B' IE IN: 29609(18"E\ IE OUT 288.82(8'N) 26.0' 2500 - ( \ ) \ SERVICES)PER BOOK 543 PAGE 36 I' r I A EX S2 MH TAX LOT 2800 IE our:z9azz(13.0). I 1 RIM:260.33 IE OUT:295.93(18.5)'. �V I L I TAX MAP 15 1 2500 1.NOES: SHOWN ARE BASED ON UNDERGROUND UTIIJtt LOCATE 1 EX ST MH \\ 111 �.' Ii IE IN: 254.02(15•S) LOT 19 MARKINGS AS PROVIDED BY OTHERS,PROVIDED PER 11 RM:317.79 \ I I -1'11 IE IN: 254,47(12"E) LOCATE TICKET NUMBER 15030210.THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO IE IN:309.05(12'S) \ 1 1 1 • 1 • I IE OUT: 253.82(15'W) _- , GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND LOCATES REPRESENT THE IE IN: 306.00(12.5) 11,l 1 1 EX ST MH I 1 1265 .I ' DESIGNED Br SRP ONLY UTILITIES IN THE AREA.CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE IE M:311.50(10•5) \ I RIM: 311.93 I i DRAM BY: SRP FOR VERIFYING ALL DOTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING E OUT:305.80(12'14) i I J CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND \ \ 1I % , IE IN: 304.96(12"SW) I 1 pEtltEp BY.. AFH _ ( IE IN: 308.20(10•S) RIGHT-OF-WAY 2. FlELD MIK WAS CONDUCTED FEBRUARY 17-24,2015. - \ - \ I I IE IN:307.85(4'N) DEDICATION PER DOC. I SCALE AS NOTED • - EXISTING AC PAVEMENT _• 1 I i 1 IE OUT,304.76(12•E) N0.2000-050935 I 1 I DATE 9/03/2015 3. VERTICAL DATUM:ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON CITY OF TIGARD \ \ - I I / REGIST BENCHMARK NO.142 AT THE NE CORNER OF HWI 99W AND SW - - - - - TAX LOT 2900 PROLE NAL \ I II 69T1 AVENUE.WITH A NOD 29 ELEVATION OF 348.05 FEET \ ( ` - (,. I i TAX MAP iS 1 2500 LAND Y \ \ # I �{L� LOT 20 -, .\ a 4. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PROPERTY BOUNDARY SURVEY • EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALI(/PAD \` ! 1 .I I _ _-- - '�---- l ..i 1 i I I 1 (4 G • 11 I , ( �l�ll (i I 1 EX STA CB �G t � -� ��- -sv-.- _A -I ,I i RIM: 25%161 r4.,:,,,,..3'i5. SURVEY IS ONLY VALID MT SURVEYOR 5 STAMP AND SIGNATURE. " - a R MIIEY 6. BUILDING FOOTPRHTS ARE MEASURED TO SIDING UNLESS NOTEDE �6519L8 / ' OTHERWISE.CONTACT SUR1£YOR WITH OUESTIONS REGARDING - SLOPES GREATER TMµ25% 0 •6/30/17 BUILDING TIES • AENSIONS SLOPES > 25% 7. CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 I FOOT. \ NUMBER AREA ACRES COLOR SCALE r = 30 FEET DRAINAGE ARROW 8. ONLY TREES HAVING A DIAMETER OF 6"AND GREATER,MEASURED 1 115045 10.35 _ AT BREAST HEIGHT,MERE SURVEYED AT THIS TIME. 12 JOB NUMBER 30 0 2.4 30 4294 SHEET g i w W W 6 R c.7 CITY G1= TIGARD Approves! byPla 1ning DENSITY CALCULATIONS REQUIRED SETBACKSI - - ate: l //4j� 'g >_ _ ___ 2 • B+.5 TONE R_4.5 2GNE - - - _ _ _ _ TAX LOT 8300 GROSS SITE AREA: 82.589 SF(1.90 AC) FRONT YARD: 20 FT I TA%MAP IS 136M // Y/Initials: �� <_g " a e J PUBIJC R.O.W.DEDICATION: 9,287 SF(0.21 AC) FRONT GARAGE 20 FT LOT 5 u+� z k 15445 SE(0.35 AC)-(SEE ETOSTINO CONDITIONS PLAN) SIDE YARD: 5 FT I S e° w CORNIER SIDE YARD: 15 FT / CORs i SLOPES>25 " NET DEVELOPABLE AREA: 27157 SF(1.33AC) REAR YARD: 15 FT I I W • I b 12 5 v'i;li is DENSITY TRANSFER: 15,445(0.25)_}3,861 SF 2500 \ I (0 'f`P_" i w u. (O.2541OPE5>255) TAX LOT 9100 a TOTAL NET AREA: §1718 SF(1.42 AC) ' TAX MAP 15 1 3666 ) J TAX LOT 2200 Z MINIMUM LOT AREA: 6,000 3 1 LOT 13 a TAX LOT 8400 I TAX MAP 1S 1 2500 / = TAX MAP IS 1 36M LOT 13 rOrRR CO MINIMUM AVERAGE LOT AREA 7,500 SF CURVE TABLE \ / (` \ LOT 6 I V N MAXIMUM LOT DENSITY: (61,718 SF)/(7,500 SF)=8.23=8 LOTS - W w MINIMUM LOT DENSITY: 8.23 LOTS4(809)=6.58=7 LOTS CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH CHORD / 0^ \ I MINIMUM AVERAGE LOT WO1H: 50 FT \ \ I 0 CI 14.00' 89.38.04' 21.90' S4420'15'E 19.74' PROPOSED LOT DENSITY: 8 LOTS C2 14.00' 9021'56' 2208' 945'39'45'E 19.86' I co Z < I • TAX LOT 2300 PROPOSED AVERAGE LOT AREA: (65,416 SF)/(8 LOTS)=8,177 7 • I TAX LOT 9200 Q PROPOSED MINIMUM LOT AREA: 6,002 SF C3 66.00' 6.48.02' 7.83' N3'52'48'E 7.83' I TAX YAP 1S 1 2500 TAX YAP IS 1 3666 LOT 14 ;LC 66.00' 21.42'11' 2500' N18'07'54'E 2485'• LOT 14 1 1 '^ I A \ TAX LOT 8500 I W Vim/ \ / TA%MAP IS 13664 is \\ LOT7 1 W CO SCALE 1" = 30 FELT / F. . W D TAX LOT 9700 ••• TAX MAP IS 1 36AA I TAX LOT 9300 TAX LOT 2400 V) 30 0 12 16 24 30 LOT 19 TAX LOT 10200 TAX MAP 1S 13666 TAX MAP IS 51 2500 N LOT 15 TAX MTARPA15 1 CT B 3666 i TAX LOT 8800 j I— TAX MAP IS 1 36AA TAX LOT 8600 0 I- LOT 10 TAX MAP 1S 1 3666 1 = I LOT 8 Z ULea W O ¢ TAX LOT 8700 p Q 0 CC J TAX MAP 1S 13666 TAX LOT 2500 TAX LOT 9600 TAX LOT 9400 LOT 9 z TAX MAP 1S 1 2500 Q TAX YAP 15 1 36M TAX LOT 9500 1 W 1 LOT 16 ''o LOT 18 TAX MAP 15 1 366* T6%MAP OT 161 3666 I a LOT 17 NBTFSl'01'N 10.00' N - NOD26'S91 81.35' 4110 _ — — _ _ — — 5.SIDE YARD SETBACK(TYP)i N0026'S9'E 16246' - - - - - - _ 1 T 159ffi 0 1114E l 5000' r ten m• . t L-49'PUBLIC unun ,e-. ■■ TRACT B I , I 1 EASEMENT(TVP) i r 20'FRONT YARD/GARAGE ■ ^g }2,648 SF 8 Z � 1 ' 2s.00' 25.00' 8 1 I m SETBACK(TVP) r Q S 666 I 4 R I I = 7 N0026'S8'E 81.78' _ Z }fi, SF I I I I I }6, SF ,+ I ±12,217 SF 8 I L Q L'� I I I I I I 5'SIDE YARD SETBACK(TVP) / %y (}10,549 MINUS ACCESS PIX}) 20 SETBACK SWz6-361r6676r 70026'20106/71'3' ' �-I • I `-----506'$O'441nrr2r--v 0'). AL:— NO026'58'E 210.80'J `� TAX LOT 2600 Q 15'REAR YARD 8'PUBLIC UTIIJtt—J 1 ^y \ 1 TAX YAP 15 1 2500 a a TAX LOT 302 TAX LOT 300 SETBACK(T`�) EASEMENT(TVP) . "VI p��/ 'W ����� S T 11,...---BUILDING SETBACK PER } LOT„ I:0-1 !�♦.♦.♦♦♦�,;;y�4l'!r �._ `'�''�°' /� L za'SETBACK F GEOTECHNICAL REPORT -oo $ TAX MAP 15 1 36M TAX MAP 1S 1 3666 r— r _ / I 15'CORNER SIDE YARDttt\\\I I �$' ♦♦♦♦ �.♦ 30'REgPROCAL ACCESS/ 5'SIDE YARD 1 • I I SETBACK(TVP) 1 I EASEMENT TO BENEFIT ( 6 SETBACK(TVP)I N0026.58'E 105.88' • /M� N0050'44'E 137.14' LOTS 6 9 7 I SF I ; I LL 1 a= •Xi _ }8,831 MINUS±10,499 CCESS POLE I gg� V 53 4 2 3 1 m h0'FRONT YARD/GARAGE 1 1,-. I ( ) ;�g o R Q Q p M 36,091 SF F'+ }6.123 3 I" I n�,ISE7BACK(TW) I n L Z VISION I Tg I I • 'I '� YD02639:E HADD_—- 1 N0026'S8'E 84.69' I r. CLEARANCE I e I ' I 1 }6,573 SF �,$�f-I �' 20'SETBACK 54473'02'E W — — — — — — 4——— L TRIANGLE(TVP) I I �S`' 26.71' 20 FRONT YARisTaarAct-- _� TAX LOT J SETBACK(T,P) I I ( se9YT9'n'E <' S I TRACT A 10.00• }n.za SF r 1 g 2700 W 66.17_ _ 52.63' _ =1_— — 1 }5,038 SF C3 �\ TAX MAP 1S 1 2500CC —_ _ _ CL _ -` 8.00' 8.00'ROW DEDICATION 211.44' I __ __ 1C4 \` J " 1 • LOT l8 18 8T 103.34' - t I50028'47'W 544.21' _ _ _ _ — �- SW.69THAVENUE n.DD L— — — __ • 25.I30' \ \ — — — — L �\ O nLvarto 9r SRP TAX LOT — � ANN By SRP 303 TAX LOT 2800 DECKED BY' AHH TAX NAP 15 1766* \ TAX MAP IS,2500 .SORE- AS NOTED • LOT 19 DATE:9/03/2015 ROOST,-• APPROVED"OAK STREET ESTATES" \ 1 PROFS ,•.NAL SUBDIVISION (SUB 2014-001) LU ILI LAND R Y CC 1 0 I , .N 2003 a ALE H.Ram 1 �•4539 5 I TAX LOT 2900e `/'°/" 4111 1 I TAX YM IS 1 2500 . LOT 20 s „y I 11 JOB NUMBER I, 4294 SHEET P03 EY)W Q W 2 le co CITY OF TIGARD NOTES SW - - - ' ?a / 70TH PLACE App�rovec ! darning �_ 1. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE REMOVAL OF ALL NECESSARY PRIVATE UTWTES MTH 8 = • 1Ff APPROPRIATE WIRY PROVIOERS. Date. a, /�v L.N 1 2. ON-SITE STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED PER APPLICABLE LOCAL,STATE,AND FEDERAL // • I / i L.i g H BUILDING CODE. _ _ /,. I_ ;I - - / �"n itials. 2= -� =F2 m� g 3. SEE PREUMINARY TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL PLAN FOR UST OF TREES TO BE ``'I I I j r ` / O REMOVED AND PROTECTED. '.11 - - - - - - _ TAX LOT 8300 , !:5\§\'11Z w 1�, TAX MAP 15 1 36AA / 0 9-41-L464----1), ILOTS / ' ��a4o w o` EI I 8 \� I Z oy� I I I .\. I W / Q_ SCALE 1" = 30 FEET -- 4 V ■ I-82s + ��' s ,I TAX LOT 9100 I / I TAX LOT 2200 Cl) W — ■ ■ J A TAX MAP 15 1 36M W M 00 0 12 IB 24 90 „ 1I d T Li LOT 13 I TAX M OTS31 2500 ,_I= I I TAX LOT 8400 1 Itic I II j I- \ TAX M0Ts61 36M 1 Q Z Q a ROCK RETAINING WALL \ I 11. 0 11 1 in O i :....1. 1--J1 1 .-600 PI" [ti TAX LOT 9800 \--, I I Y i co I I TAX LOT 2300 TAX MAP,Si 36M \\ ' t I 1 TAX LOT 9200 1 I I J 0 TAX M0TS1 2500 LI] > LOT 20 ROCK RETAINING WALL I II TAX MAP 15 1 36M TAX LOT 9900 ,_ '1 1 1 1 LOT 14 l 1 Q TAX MAP 1S 1 36AA del -1 3nSl X51"1� \ / I I LU LOT 21 T,.I1 i I II l / TAX LOT 8500 I Vti°� �� W CO II i 1 I.y.I S\ TAX M0T571 36AA E/I I �I \ W n I I I I ' -- ROCK RETURNS WALL c I I 1 _ / CV TAX LOT 9700 I!'� I TM MAP IS 136AA 1 I I �! TAX LOT 9300 KEYSTONE ' I TAX LOT 2400 CO LOT 19 TAX LOT 10200 I TAX MAP 15 136M RETAINING WALL I .II Q 3, I LOT 15 I TAX MAP IS 1 2500 TAX MAP 1S 1 36AA ` _ I I I W LOT 15 Z TRACT B - - - I TAX LOT 8800 I> I �� I I TAX MAP IS 1 36AA TAX LOT 8600 '-I Q 0 �'.: I I 1� LOT 10 TAX MAP 1S t 36AA II I Q 1 O LC h Q1� ROCK RETAINING WALL - I r Q a B.ao'PDE—,I I TAX LOT 8700 TAX LOT 2500 ~ TAX LOT 9400 TAX MAP IS I 36AA h I I / TAX MAP,S 1 2500 TAX LOT 9600 I I Lor9 � I� TAX MAP 15 1 36M TAX LOT 9500 I W1 (� I I TAX MAP 15 136A0 AlIA W LOT 16 • LOT iB AC WOOD FFMCE TAX MAP DT 171 360 �1 I 1 < Ari C OYE AC T 16 FENCE I / -- - io��I I I I BRICK RETAINING WALL Z AC SAW(M AND a An WOOD FENCE �_�3` in- - - - , --- T— _. / -L_- - - / �\ f / / j _ i wAu rDEac iillalOVE J ROCK `/ O c„,T�_.. RTMOYEBARRICADE. pawn lolllS O `� WIRE a CE ` \ r r _ • HOUSEI . £ \ / \ REMOVE WtliE FEMCE. ., Q,V`° I . 1'1:-.' Z ' FAL ,� J 10005 ARE FENCE MRE FENCE �` F \- _ _ RR TIE REMOVE \ \ FROM PROPERTY ss\ �', ? f/Q I i - Ys �,"-:''� ,� ,, Q RETAINING IOOOR No REMOVE � ' \ 1 1 316 ,v\ 1 r \ WALL 1 Y � I \-gs 1 ) I0I H C \ `. \ REMOVE OVERHEAD WIRE-COORDINATE 1 10 0 �� r \ 1 ----II..;..' \ .,.//- MTH APPROPRIATE UIYJTY PROVIDERS " ”'11`` W \ REMOVE GRAVEL //// " RR if STEPS '7 \ DRIVEWAY \ REMOVE 10354 ' 0 I I 2 HOUSE \ ; \ \�5 �_ y� 010329 ';/10397 '1,..,72/in6 ( 2�fl^ TAX LOT 2600 TAX LOT 302 TAX LOT 300 \ 1 103° r-.�IIo351/ 3 / �J ' TA%M5DD M� J TAX Y�OT 400 \ 0327(�711�3 Q y 'g395/ �°Q I I LOT 17 LL 0. TAX MAP,S 136M TM MAP 1S 136AA 10010 \ SANITARY SEWER TAX M S 1 36AA GARAGE \, (�` / '�1'' -Lim* - - / / I N0.2009-035261 \ 0079 OAJ w \ 100980 O 102} $ // / / �1 �- O I EASFTAENT PER DOC... \ is \ 79' i�A1EL I / / // / / 1 a 4X SHED / \ 1' STRUCTURE W 1.. P I 102 8 I.. I 1 ( \ I . / 10393 10502"s I P 1 \ I 'C° REMOVE WATER �"- o p 1 19 \ O 's REMOVE I I Is; I I 1 _ IkCP I 10061 T \N i' A II ��_�� j . III • $ REMOVE�\ HOUSE \'1` 1 v � Ia 1 � oI —- - - _ - - - - 'g \ \ \ CONCRETE REMOVE I CMP 7N � -.- ,\91 I-}255 I I \ PATH & 1 !1 STANDING' V w � )-' I t , , 1 TAX LOT CC ''`__,.___— _ ; 1 , \ _ WATER ID2A3(3 ��p Q� I z 2700 d -\ - 1 ___r__ _ AC SAYJT NO OQg1,0 \tJ' MAP 15 I 41-41- --V- r. RDgVE AC I WREMOVE IRE NCE \ iW48 REMOVE CATCH BSTORMVIIMER AS14 \ REMOVE \� 31593 1567 I O 31055 \\\0 `>� ;(�' >s \o \76n II I TAX LOT 18 SOD �� 1 WIRE FENCE \ 1 0 031 60 .B * I 1j 3 59n \ 054 3 59 0 1 , `3 -AVENtle ---e7 — - - — — _M _ _ _ _ \ O -` oma - �L� F�B, �P - -r„- - L _ ' -,w s- \ ��`\\ O -. PAM Br. SRP CYECKED BY. 44H 5I; AS NOTED -It - - 1 \ - - L - - -I—_ - V 10 \� V � �# �I I- _ I DATE 9/03/2015 TAX LOT I I \. I I ��� I I 1 = TAX LOT 2800 \ , 303 i \ \ ,. \�I I I I I I TAX MAP IS 2soo ciS ,,C, TAX MAP IS 1 36M \ �,1 1 \ 1 % I ( I - LOT 19 �\ GY', 1 ` 1 \ I I I 116sN - �� \ \ I I I �� : � �YCRe A I ; AEME1YAL DATE:5/9a/i, • 1 \ I I J 1 I REASONS \ 1 l I I 1. 1 i1 I �� N. I I I ik I ' 11 I TAX LOT 2900 a TAX MAP 15 1 2500 JOB NUMBER t � �A 1 -, I I I -- 11 I� �I ,AT In 4294 G SHEET i PO4 ' 1-\--1� r I I..)1--- ' TAX LOT 2300 ru c TAX LOT 9200W cc LEGEND \\ , �tO6A nz MA 's 1 2500 Tree Preservation 5 Removal Table: s ,�� y' TAN MAP LOT S41 36AA I 1 �� 1 LOT 14 DBH Pr./eine/ O WW 1 ( ) :I \ Tree a Common Name m E moi\ • 11\ I \ (Inches) Remove w x [05346 GROUND CONTOUR(1 Ff) .' 1• I I 1s• \ / I i S * •.jI I 10008 Sweet Cherry 9.14 Remove ,!jT TAX LOT 8500 ,055501 '6`.4' (\I -� tODW Sweet Cherry 6.10,32 Remo. he se w DOSING GROUND CONTOUR(5 FT) --445-- \. I I I I a 1•\ • ( a TAX NAP 15 1 36AA - 10016 English Hawthorn 8.6,6.6.7,6 Remo. F a FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR(1 FT) ' \- IA- ) • -I \ LOT 7 ,+: 1 1 1 I / 10552 R I 10019 English Heath= 8.6 Remove Z FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR(5 —445— ( 1 ! / 10048 Per 12 Remove N c7= ,•\ I 1 II M - •• 10076 Jeer Pine 48 Remove K- chsTlNG CONIFEROUS TREE �__ ". l ..\4_ TAX LOT 9300 I �. 4 • 'ill. TAX LOT '4 1m79 wlw�e 36 Rema. E2y Z ID I TAX MAP 15 i 361A L 00 10081 Monkey P497Ie 6 Remo. ..o .z EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE O 7 •., �' N: RAX MAP 15 1 2500 .i!N �'fLOT 15 ROW1 Oregon while oak 3< Ramo. . M TAX LOT 8800 1 1 W; LOT 1510098 Oregon Mute Oak 43 Rama � zTREE REMOVALX )1 611TAX MAP 1S 1 36AA TAX LOT 8600 105411I 1ot67 Werm WHIM Pim 0 PnwrnCi13 " j I I) TAX MAP IS 1 36AA 0544 t I Q I 10166 Wrm While Pine 9 Pnrrn b e F z N OT 10 TREE PROTECRON FENCE evrwwwxAHxNxHk ire =•H i_ I-I OT 6 `I. i O p ,.-11 101® ftorw•y M■pl• 7 _Preserve a�"�^ i O II•.'� U .l I tO1ro sweet Cherry tt Remo._ 'iti-' n, i w,2 I• • I 10185 Bgleal Mope 24 Remo. TREE DRIPUNE -----._-- 11 • �. Q j(W�■.I TAX _OT 8 700 10541 \ 10158 10234 Oregon venae oak 29 Remo. Z A '\� 'S"NAT, CI). 1 I TAX MAP 15 1 36AA 1 a I i� AX LOT 2500 10258 Redwood 20 Remo. O- \�.� TAX _OT 9500 'I I TAX LOT 9400 LOT 9 / 777... AX MAP IS 1 25D0 '( 10259 Oregon Whin Oak 3e Remo. EDOSTNG TREE CANOPY ARU \ \ \ I,I- (PER MATURE CANOPY VALUES) V 'I'I 6 W 1 LOT 16 10280OregonDouglas-fir 10 Remora W i `�� �"� iA%UAP 15 1 36AA t.I' TAX MAP 15 1 36AA 10263 Ash 10 Remove LOT 16 I BUILDING SETBACK PER ct�, LOT 17 Y GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 10533,"/) r 10273 BI nalMa I• 17 Preserve CD NOTE SEE COVER SHEET FOR GENERAL PINI LECfIp I - 0 P I+ 't\cris' '� 1016/1 1 / \\/ _ . HJO41•t \ ,V / 10274 Blgl•af Maple 10 PreserveLLI 0 -.-w._I �.+°._ •-�; - _ I P•': • '4 ham';10167 - I 7 0304/ , / //// J►• \l/r_ .. / , 4. as"_a >�/ , 10304 Green Mountain A. 7,6 Preserve Z ` c �q� „_. P,_ ' 4c......... a 1� 10313 Western Redeeder 42 Preserve O --}- :���-T.�•. -`- � T1 a>'�k� \\ \ ='1� e0�� •�\\ ' /,�IL.•�W.111,�+� Hfr•r'9 ...' �,,ur, \ 103j English Hawthorn 6.9.13 RemoveIICC --.', �ji - / i I 11' r\�\ ,,. \ I 7.111", - - 1\\\\, _�,\,,..` o ``�.�`� d�',.;F . I `..�` A\ 1 +5ia. 7 I 5y 4 103Brglea Maple 1e Remo. '^ w���j V .1, r: , a HISS ,.i �,jj Sr' 9 -tea Bg MaWe• • • Oregon Whne Oak AS. i Bgleal Mage 20 Remo. Q i 6 ,SF \ \I I '••••1,_rill 1 ' I•1 �•I' cg? 11 Yf, I I I • �\ \ \ 9 \♦Y\ C r�• y' \ • 10351 Bgleal Maple 21 Remo. 1 \ ( �V/ �, I oiA .. V)\ VH -c 111- 21t7 :�� �• $1 "A'- • ,a I1 10354 Ogler Refine _ 12_ Remo. 1,, \ , , �C 77- QIf1, `' ` -_-_\ '\ / T I - �t a - ''�• �' -r...f.\a\ -.N • At•..'u7 llik* .' I 10380 Western Red[eda 19 Remove W It1 i' --J 2� _ - 10370 Western Redced■r 12 Prerrn 14�`._ .—��-vm�� r ,, 4 _ ."dna_ ` , �� triii� � .fit J;`+ ►•w�.'is a?af,9ce_ 5�. TAX LOT 2600 W • r'\ _ �c '7 vC 40 •z� e▪ — TAX MAP 75,2500 CC N 1 \11A \_ A ` I,Jekt� 1 �\ - _ - N�111�11 _ •� �1 n '^ ,�{ti/'f 'w���w�.�,- 1ro7z warm R•dc•dar 31 Preserve TAX LOT 300 \ �1a ,� A OU . oil' l �. ,�• Inc♦ 9 �' t w�1� / 1 OT'7 10362 Weetem Redceder 14 Pnrm Mfg, TAX MAP IS 1 36AA - . -.211.S111 ; ii�I ser/e a 10161 Haa4lr 43 Newm 9 ► ` INR 11 A � F+...�+....e#.�Y � .' '4 �4. 1'�' — + ,».� �w N \\ \ II� 1111 '11.1'.4' I11'40, 1 I ��•.\'�r yeI !^'r ) \I •.I I 10384 We■em Reducer 24 Preserve 1 e I N'-51..1�x'115� NP �(1'4 , 8 \ ye• -rs,2's.tA! :-7,: n4ox9ll.1416 it 1 r - rv_ ,.A, 1 ♦ ��;;�� ---- to166 weaem Rafted/R. 22 Preserve ��. - I , �" � � � II,1n� 1. '+i �7 v ��.o. �. ' >, �`�!�!'-"� 1 (n 0 4 I y,n( 1 I rte. �•- ,� 114' AIM/ µi'' 1 y .-. • -I ARBORIST OBgRVATION REWIRED DURING ALL �. Ii (• :ITT � �% .J ``�� �' �'.•N l 1' 1 �- . 1, I '\ , /g • r�•'� 10388 Wrm Redcedw 32 Preserve • P +I I I /r +�(0,6, TREE RBYOVAL MIND TREE PROTECTION FENCE 103e7 Weet•m Radudar 6 Preserve ' '\1 _ �� \ 1 1G6t�' \ \- \ 1hel I y •i '�� 6 \ 10766 WenmRedc•dar 26,33 Pnserw '/ 6' r :f ' , 1 Sr 111 11 O11 \ \ 110- �f..,,•I�'_ ( I I, T%vs1` - aie.•,,! :..:Ic.r�v.. Z I 'V i' �. I �o -■fie..'V...';,till-,516 I • \ /\ '— • � 10389 B leafM. a 17 Sneer/. 50002 \ .• ,I I i '4. \ i1i•�� L i - e 4 1 A 1 4 A s ori`\�!! N 7C X �, g M Q 1i _ H r;1� i �� '\. r 'N.la 016 `.ro �� A'x40r4. 7} g W CC - - -- 1 \ I''P I A , `� �• 1 55-�,.._1.1. I 10391 B<leafW • 0 Preserve n, ♦q ib,577 Sr' • \ ` -4,`� ♦\ 10392 BI leaf Pimple 10 Pnsery l -� 11 1\ %<:4 • i �' »I Jf� � " ''''Aft� , ,1I TAX LOT g O , ,�4 g, \ 7 ....,44,-. \� I 1 10101 ,.f_�. Ys' S� aZ. Q I 10393 western Redcedr 33 Reno. CI ts ♦ N r I\ ti. I \I (-- "�- l� \ - • `� . ��* o4,44::;,,..,';,.4t..::. . \,. 0 9 , ..i 2700 152%5 western Reoceda 23 Remove k' ■ -- 1- \ '. .�� ,� --- 1:'•\ '1,t{.4 \��r.�' ,���C .ec10796 Red Alder 10 Pnwrn r SWC 1 • ~ -. '�'•• ...--,N, .� 1 ..�,�: r .,ft k n\/•_ TAX MAP,S t 25DD i — V ��' VENUE s.. < ! '*` +O ` f` ., , �cyA,?!��R n IyIyIMilk%�s:`��yt�s� e V�1. lir111{i S \ \ i _` DT,B ,0397 western Redced. „ Remove e.w i �/ �N♦44 .>P. .LS 4e°� d !R,'. i. .�_' t "fv�f4 �: «S ' ii}Vi __!M live 12 0 , T I 10402 western Redcedr 44 Rena. .. ..lam-s- -ti■.v.A. '! Ih3l:,J:A.i.M\ .j �.�: =Nom■ _ T■9sRm a� �s. r ..ii`s\� 1e ""r'1i\ 0� _Pa v.1. I 10411 w.rmR•dc.rr 24 Preserve IIIII - 7` , - \_ ` ;S AVENUE _ ''\ N41,1711117-...,--,-•-4-----7...------_.77'. .--7--....::', A�.,. 0 .., — — 10416 9gleaf Maple 7 Preserve •• \ te '�"siu T- ,n_ - ... —_ _ _ ^ ,• _ \ `$ X51167 ,,,.~'�' •+V. 10417 WeaMm ReduGr 26 Preserve " T /l7 '�'-� + .LSCC - )_ _/....,.::: -� �� � ,.___ �"����� I. 1 _ 10418 Cherry 11 Preserve LU 4% 7 -- 7 ������\\ ��� I twt9 warm Roomier n Preserve��I�r:I9y► r ��9►�r��T r ��wAA` 1 0 ���►®Yi�l1 "117h�il�lS, ��� , �'�\1. �c� --`-• `\4 \ (. YYY l— I ta46 Wrm Reduwr 42 Preserve W Q ,'1 r r 'r -1-- __�_ __ 1{.___• \\ le 1 /7 \ 1 `','I.:\ 1\� riN .4 \ I 10!67 WrmR•dudar 14 Pnrrn W Z I f -'-F -«-- __J____ L__T_ `�- _ i 1 11 1 10462 Sweet Cherry 6 Preserve \, y APPROI,ED"OAK ST'EET ESTA ES" I Ili 111'''1'11 ,LI •t I 1\ I , 1 TAX MAPP 15 25DD 800 10481 weatemReoclee 30 Rama. Q 0 --II I 1 I „L I 1'` 10501 Red Alda 10 Remo. Z Z SUBDIVISION(SOB 2014-001)1 ,• 1,;'� L-�� LOT,9 ,qr Douglas-fir 30 Rano. } O Q TREE PROTECTION NOTES: t- • I Soso Bgke Mope 8 Remo. A. NO CHANGES SHALL BE MADE TO ANY ASPECT OF THE APPROVED URBAN FORMAT PLAN avow TRITER CONSENT FROM 11E PROSECT MOIST AND OTY ARBORIST. • -i 10540 Red Alda 10 Rano. B. TREE PROTECTION SHALL 6E INSTALLED PRIOR 10 ANY GROUND DISTURBANCE NORK. /I "I P i f5• / I U 1168 `- 10505 Bgleor Mage 7 Remo. C Q Z 1 10506 Red Alda 7 Rano. Q C. NO PERSON MAY CONDUCT ANY AUNTY WITHIN THE PROTECTED AREA OF ANY TREE DESIGNATED TO REMAIN,INCLUDING.BUT NOT LIMITED TO,PARKING EQUIPMENT,PLACING SOLVENTS, - I rI I1 • ." \I • 10607 Warmt Maple 32 Preserve Z J STORING BUILDING MATERIAL AND SOL DEPOSITS,DUMPING CONCRETE WASHOUT AND LOCATING BURN MOLES I I3' •1••• SCALE 1- = 30 FEET I ; (� ,', 10619 B{glaar Mage 11 Preserve , , i l. I I i . . I 10620 Red Alder I Preserve C cc a EN D. ATTACIITS TO TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION-NO PERSON SHALL ATTACH ANY OELECT TO ANY TREE DESIGNATED FOR PRESERVATION. Preserve 10621 Red Alder 7 PreseW 9u - --0 12 16 21 96 mewl 10622 Red Alder 10 Preserve E. PRIOR TO ANY GROUND DISTURBANCE,THE CONTRACTOR ,^ WM POSTS SHOULD BE 10623 Blgleaf Maple 6 ---Preserve LU L/ 1. SHALL ERECT AND MAINTAIN READILY VISIBLE TREE PROTECTION FENDING ALONG THE OUTER EDGE MID COMPLETELY SURROUNDING THE PROTECTED AREA OF ALL PROTECTED TREES I�Cu WWI 2'STEEL U CHAM4 10524 M Iea1 Maple 6 Presern OR GROUPS OF TREES AS SHOW. yueERAL NOTES HIGHLY NSITOFFLAGGING g9 - CC W (6 2 1/2'DIA Ml OR 6 D.C.MAX ANCHORED TO LOPS OF 10525 Bgleal Mage 8 Remo. /Y 1. EXACT LOCATION OF FUTURE Of THE IS MORON BUILD LINK AREA THE ED PER SETBACKS 4'118'LIMBER,6'W LENGTH ANCHOR POSTS 10526 Red Amer 9 Remo. CC 2 MAY BE REWIRED TO COVER MITI MULCH TO A DEPTH OF AT!EAST SIX(6)INCHES,OR MIH PLYWOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL OVER THE ROUT ZONE OF A TREE N ORDER TO ARE SHOWN AS A REFERENCE Of THE MAXIMUM BUILDING AREA ALLOMFD PER LOT. villi; o. a O PROTECT ROOTS FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY HEAVY EQUIPMENT 2. GRADING AND FTWNG,PROPOSED DEMOUTON,CONSTRUCTION PARKING AND AND I 10633 Red Alder 11 Presern C CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT STORAGE,AND STOCKPILE LOCATIONS ARE SHOWS ON THE 70636 Rea Alder 74 Preserve C 3. SHALL PROHIBT E%CAVAIHON OR COMPACTING OF EARTH OR OTHER POTENTIALLY DAMAGING ACTIVITIES MTHIN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DEMOLITION PLAN 2'SQUARE,9 GAUGE 10641 Red Alder 6,12 Prewrn LU 4.MAY BE REWIRED TO MINIMIZE ROOT DAMAGE BY EXCAVATION OF A TWO(2)FEET DEEP TRENCH,Al THE EDGE OF THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE,TO CLEANLY SEVER THE ROOTS OF la 3. THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING FOR THE SITE IS LIMITED TO THE STREET TREE INSTALLATION GALVANIZED MIRE MESH 10644 Cherry 11 Preserve M TREES 1p BE RETAINED. AND THE LANDSCAPING OF THE WATER QUALITY FAOUTY(MDL BE PROVIDED WM HNAL 10647 Cherry 12 Preserve L.L ENGINEERING PLANS). i .' i iii 10652 Blplea1 Maple 12 Preserve 5.MAY BE REQUIRED TO HAVE CORRECTIVE PRUNING PERFORMED ON PRESERVED TREES IN ORDER TO AVOID DAMAGE FROM MACHINERY OR BUILDING ACTIVITY,AND MAY BE REWIRED 10666 Brglear Maple 12 Preserve TO MAINTAIN TREES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD BY WATERING AND FERTILIZING. ROOT PROTECTION ZONE NOTES: 10646 Green Mount.ln MAN 7 Preserve DESIGNED AY. SRP 6.SHALL MAINTAIN THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING IN PLACE UNTIL THE PROJECT ARBORIST AND OTT ARBORIST AUTHORIZES THEIR REMOVAL ENCROACHMENT INTO THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE MAY BE ALLOWED WITH PROSECT ARBORIST ANCHOR POSTS MUST BE I 10660 Prunus app. 7 Preserve APPROVAL AS DESCRIBED N THE FOLLOWING NOTES: INSTALLED ID A DEPTH OF 10679 Sweet Cherry 10 Preserve WHAM BY: SRP 7.SHALL ENSURE THAT ANY LANDSCAPING DONE IN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE SUBSEQUENT TO THE REMOVAL OF THE BARRIERS SHALL BE ACCOMUSHED NTH U3HT MACHINERY 0R 1. EXCAVATION IN THE TOP 24.OF TIE SORITI L IN THE CCAL ROOT ZONE AREA 940LAD BEGIN NO LESS THAN 1/3 THE 31054 Oregon WT,te Oak 24 Remove DEEMED en. AHH HAND LABOR. USE PUNT MATERIALS NTH COMPATIBLE WATER REQUIREMENTS TO TREE 10 BE PRESERVED AND DIRECT SPRAY IRRIGATION AWAY FROM TRUNKS Al THE EXCAVATION UNE THAT IS CLOSEST TO THE TREE. COITAL HF](3HT d:POST 31055 Oregon wnne Oak 21 Remo. saai AS NOTED F. THE GRADE SHALL NOT BE ELEVATED OR REDUCED WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE WITHOUT THE PROJECT ARBORISTS AUTHS6ZATON.THE PROJECT ARBORIST MAY ALLOW COVERAGE 2 1}E EXCAVATION SHOUN BE DONE BY HAND/SHOVEL OR NTH A BACKHOE AND A MAN MTI NOTES 31059 Oregon Ash 6 Ram. DATE:1/03/2015 A SHOVE].PRUNING SHEARS,AND A PRUNING SAW. 31060 Oregon While Oak 17 Remote Q, OF TH OF UP TO ONE HALF E AREA OF THE TREE'S ROOT ZONE MTH LIGHT SOLS(NO CLAY)TO THE MINIMUM DEPTH NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT GRADING OR LANDSCAPING PINTS,E IT 1. METAL FENCE FOR TREE PROTECTION DEVICE,ONLY. MILL NOT IMPERIL THE SURVIVAL OF THE TREE AERATION DEVICES MAY BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE TIE TREES SURVIVAL 3. K DONE BY HMO,ALL ROOTS 1'OR LARGER SHOULD BY PRUNED AT THE EXCAVATION UNE 2 BOUNDARIES OF PROTECTION AREA MILL BE ESTABU9HED IN 31061 Englsh Hawthorn 9 Preserve Q' 4. P DONE NTH A BACKHOE(MOST LIKELY SCENARIO),THEN 11f OPERATOR SHALL START THE THE FIELD BY 1141 ARBORIST PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 31063 Oregon Ash 6 Preserve �w\ ' O+ G. IF THE GRADE ADJACTD A PRESERVED IS RAISED SUCH THAT IT COULD SLOUGH OR ERODE NTD THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE,IT SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED TO WT AT THE EXCAVATION UNE AND CAREFULLY'FEEL'FOR ROOTS/RESISTANCE MIEN THERE 3. BOUNDARIES OF PROTECTION AREA SHOULD BE STAKED AND 31161 Blgleaf Maple 8 Preserve \ YGO C\ ENT PREVENT SUFFOCATION OF THE ROOTS. IS RESISTANCE,THE MAN NOV THE SHOVEL HAND DIGS AROUND THE ROOTS AND PRUNES THE FLAGGED BY THE ARBORIST PRIOR TO INSTALLING DEVICES lL� \) 4. AVON)DAMAGE TO CRITICAL ROOT ZONE. DO NOT DAMAGE 31163 BigNaf Maple 14 Preserve '6 O a ROOTS LARGER THAN t'DIAMETER. Q '\<Z' H. AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED 15116N THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE Cr ANY TREE TO BE PRESERVED WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION CF THE PROJECT ARBORIST.THE OR SEVER LARGE ROOTS WHEN INSTAWNG POSTS 31164 MOW Wpe 7 Preserve 0 PROSECT ARBORIST MAY REQUIRE SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND/OR USE OF AERATION DEVICES TO ENSURE TIE TREES SURVIVAL AND TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR ROOT 5. DEVICE SHOULD BE MAJNTMNED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 31166 Wer.Redcedar 28 Preserve p�5 5 INDUCED DAMAGE TO THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. 31166 ' Red Alder I Preserve• C, METAL TREE PROTECTION FENCE 31167 Red Alder 9 Preserve I. TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PRACTICAL UTUTY TRENCHES SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE OF TREES TO BE PRESERVED.THE PROJECT ARBORIST MAY y eEx9as REQUIRE THAT ORATES BE TUNNELED UNDER THE ROOTS OF TREES TO BE PRESERVED IF THE PROSECT AR80RIST DETERMINES THAT TRENCHING WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE I, BRUCE R. BALDWIN, ATTEST THAT THIS 31166 warm Radudar 9 Preserve CHANCES OF THE TREES SURVIVAL 7']i 31233 Red Alder 7 Preserve TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL PLAN / J 31587 Jeffrey Pine 3t Remo. E J. DIRECTIONAL FEWNG OF TREES SHALL BE USED TO AVOID DAMAGE TO TREES DESIGNATED FOR PRESERVATION. MEETS ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS IN \ r 31593 Gregor,Ash 7 Remo. SECTION 10, PART 1, OF THE CITY OF • -. ___-11y1 SEE SUPPLEMENTAL ARBORIST 31529 Apple 6 Preserve JOB NUMBER K. DIE PROSECT ARBORIST MAY RECMNRE ADDITIONAL TREE PRESERVATION MEASURES*ICH ARE CON951ENT'NTH TREE CME INDUSTRY STANDARDS TIGARD URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL. Q'�C�I REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION4294 31se7 Oregon AMI q7 Preserve L AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION,ALL TREES 919.10 ONCE AGAIN BE RENEWED TO EVALUATE THEIR CONDEMN.LAND CLEARING AND REMOVAL OF ADJACENT TREES CAN EXPOSE ` 31500 Oregon Aral 6 Preserve PREVIOUSLY UNSEEN DEFECTS AND OTHERWISE HEALTHY TREES CAN BE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. /t-�,!...__-•--- 60000 Oregon AM B PnwrnSHEET g M. SNIPS SHALL If QIOHo(DR LEFT N PLACE)AS NECESSARY SO AS NOT TO CAUSE DAMAGE TO THE ROOT ZONES Cr BALDTNN,CERTIFIED ARBORIST BRUCE R. BALDWIN Cr ADJACENT TREES TD BE PRESERIED ON THE SUIECT PARCEL MartTREE PRESERVATION/REMOVAL PLAN BY BRUCE R.BALDMN,CERTIFIED 60001 0alglaa4lr _24 Preserve V OR ABUTTING PAROLS STOWS NEAR PROPERTY LIES SHALL ALSO BE GROUND(OR LEFT N PLACE)AS NECESSARY SO AS NOT TO CAUSE DISTURBANCE 1O ADJACENT PMMCEIIS PN-6666A moor owe 12/31/11 ARBORIST�N-6666A,PATH AKS ENGINEERING&FORESTRY. 60002 Glem Seclude -30 Preserve N W W R U M E F U he LE2' r .1 5 LEGEND CITY OF TlGARD ,2,_ 0• CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND ADA RAMPS CONSTRUCTED BY DEVELOPER `\ 1 C=7 i Approved by Pla ping _ III • \ W CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTED BY HpAEBU1DER \ - g. Date: �?l9 /!� N„o-g yZ NEW AC PAVEMENT.FULL DEPTH SECTION ----- � mit als: �,S l i . W i- ____J W ug"'fi W Ee• N SCALE 1" FEET I V W � Q 0' I� I U) c� so 0 12 18 24 ao w= I � IV Z W �,i I CO- > � ~ Z Ow 25 j�'(I 6'WIDE CONCRETE 1_,/' , / AC SAWCUT N O - - - - -- - - --_- -SIDEWALK - - - __ - Y--- - - - - - - --- BOLLLARDS +„ W > 41 IURNA�ROAUND 10:1 WIDENING BOLLARDS APER I '� I TRACT B IJ 3 O (2•WIDE) T O 7 W co ; " I ; W cn I . I 1- CV / O ti Z 6 2 3 Q 0 CC )1 — _ 1 I 4 / (�o --- 10:1 NARROWING DRIVEWAY BY I t I I–" ----------- TAPER(4'WIOE) (HOAEBUILDER ) .111 I �' ( f-N51 ATR) 5 TRACT A ~ TRIANGLE -'- -- w 0 ._____________ 25+00 �_ ~- �4i—fir R25.ar1 104*al- _________ ` -------- ------------- - nPt r cx - ------- --- -- 14+00 ---- --- --}------H- --- 1 g�AC SAWCUTI - -- J SW 69TH AVENUE z5+ao 2z+ooa— — _ a LLI CC APPROVED"OAK STREET ESTATES" I (n SUBDIVISION (SUB 2014-001) w I I > W cc (J1 Z . 0Ia J W cc EXIST R/41 I RI 50 RI a 25' 4' I I I 21' DEDICAII ' 12' 9• ' 25 I �. 8' P.U.E. P.0 E I I PL G Al -y oL9CEB Br. SRP 0.5' I I P.U.E. I DRAWN BY SRP 14' I I — —0.5(TYPICAL) 0.5•(TOPICAL) ~-(TYP.) I 10 DECKED Y. MIH I 9 5 5 5 I 0.5' O S' S S 14' i 14' 4- 5 5' Iii`0.5' 2' B' 2' DATE:9/OJ/2015 I I SCALE: AS NOTED 1 W 4' .V MAX. 5:1 MAX 5 V MAX. ?v pN'K til a 2597, 2X 2.50X 2.SOX 2R M'4' 1� ss, 2'1 YAX S:f MAX. ' '1 r. �,S t 5:1 MAX. \VFx I 1 Y Mq .,t [��*(4' �, 1 I . �� I _,;-•:•,;-•:•.;•:•:•:•;-1.:11,71 .! •••I /III/ I••I W- ti' t 4 +W��" 0'U / STANDARD CURB s,Mgx 1`��+ I i, ✓' 'z x—v-5✓*,71,`V.V ���'� q<'eWWW♦<V7N��•' I Z,4 I ,,r,0R H 4' 7'(SINGLE LIFT)CF INIAC OYER, WrHcwK DATE 6/30/17 GUTTER( ) STANDARD CURB 2'CF 3/4'-0 CRUSHED ROCK OYER, RENvaS - ._ , • GUTTER( ) fi'CF 1-1/2'-0 CRUSHED ROCK BASE COURSE OYER, TYPICAL HALF STREET SECTION J5'"DT OVER TYPICAL STREET SECTION COMPACTED SISGRADE 2'(W 3/4'-0 CRUSHED ROCK OVER, 5.5'AC LIFT OVER. SW 69TH AVENUE 7.Cf 1-1/2•-D CRUSHED ROCK OYER, SW LOCUST STREET 2•CF 3/(-O CRUSHED ROCK OVER, TYPICAL 8' TURNAROUND SECTION LOCAL STREET COMPACTED SUBGRADE LOCAL STREET 7 CF 1-1/2'-O CRUSHED ROCK OVER, STA 0+10.50-STA 0+24.04 JOB NUMBER STA 21+0100-STA 23+97.00 STA 8+20.00-STA 9+61.00 COMPACTED SUBCRADE NOT TO SCALE 4294 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE SHEET P07 ANS DAAWNG FILE 4294 POB OG LAYOUT:P08 • • • 62 "' 340.1 0L".4 u g o 8 340.12 338.3 !; 33630 + g o s o g g ss • / 302.2 _, I }. _- I N BVCS. 6+34. - + 336.2 / 8 s.302.1 $ 336181/„..\\I °i 303.8 mro ss 339 I '_`4> 333.91 { -- - - - -.-_-r - • S . 305.1 ` -- $ >m • , Eu • ' 7 g� " : 331.6 0 331.65 END PARTIAL'STREET IMPROVEMENTS -. g _ o E E 305.35 STA: 23+97.00 SW 69TH AVENUE 37 _ L EL 331.38 3061 94 _-_ EVCS:6+94 329 42 _ 1 I 329.38 • 307.0 * 327.1 1 0 327.11 1 1 • -:•,,,_ 307.9 o11 IP y • _ 3246 a" I aoi Y 324.84 r 34. • 71 306.7 - r D u 322.6 Id 1y* A Z r I S 58 322 ---�-- •.22 I-0 • �� os + Z r co71 rrl 0 309.7 7J O 2 Mil C m A =O I z 320.4 EXISNIG GROUND AT CENTERLINE s ..._ Zr A pm r^ 32015 FIN yyl�pp GRADE AT E. ---- -cr't Tri< ("2 BEGIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS O m A O * 1 N• u 56 co➢.. N C 310.9 SVCS. 8+21.93 Z7 _ cn - - co _ STA: 8+20.00 SW LOCUST STREET ! • . BCE 310 5,5 1-0- N g O ' 310.64 EL 310.46 s < O • N II II N Je N. { d N 316.8 -c� > po XI m CI FR m }11.6 I S u m N II'w i o 84677 . B BVCE?318.2 co 0 311.22 i I --__.FVCS' 453.93 >o r^CO �' EVC 311.27 *m m 317.4 __ z N M mo @'. V➢� 317.45 p O 312.3 EXISTING GROUND AT CENTERLINE IIF •,. BOGS, 6+73.97 II _ o 6 z 311.48 FINISHED GRADE AT CENIERUNE 8SCE: 31047 i 11 t'',3 n G Z 316.1 -_-t=f 31615 _ ▪ 313.0 .... _.. 0 3148 =SSTA 315,yg00.00 SSW LOCUST STREET SII O 311.98 1 1 I I + w8��'4R 31415 I I 1 I • • -•u o EVCS:21464.66 I 314.1 __._...._1._..___L _. I L J EWE 314.31 I 312.93 '::;'''... -7' . _ __ ENCS: 9+3.97 0 313.6 f EVCE-313.48 313.62 T 314.8 it BYO& 9+4800 O 314.25 - RACE 31415_--_. -9 END STREET IAPROVEMENTS y 312.8 _. . - • STA:9+61.00 SW LOCUST STREET `g" 31280 EL 314.79k.'- s2 315.9 _ 8Uin P' e4,': 31133 I +g •' 135111 PARTIAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS ' EGGS. 9+&.00 + 3124 - LTA:2142.66 SW 69184 AVENUE - 9:, � ' ;J '0 EVCE 315.59 8 312.41 I 8 -r EL•61243 ST:10+00.90 SW L O 1INTERSECTION I „. o o STA' LOCUST 5 EET 312.5 21+97.00 SW 69TH MENU 316.00 L : I 312.46 I __..... ;::::g I I I 11 I i g '8 0 0 0 o S ` 312.9 t _ 31295 1 ® I BVCS:2 44.66313.11 BVCE I 313.7 313.74 I -_-- ' I y 3145 I. 8 314.54 o o g o 0 25 g I BEGIN TURNM01ND I •/ I 1 MATCH EXISTING STA 0+10.50 PED PATH c:. y EL 325.03 3«q 8 s•ADE BREAK 1'l r 32288 041'0505006180- END TURNAROUND N-, ELEV. 323 Fl z BEGIN PEDESTRIAN PAIN ' GR iE BREAKS C STA 0+24.06 PED PAIR S A 0+40.0'PED PATH m m 320.2 - . .EL 323.00 ELEV- 321.01 x z zrnA A o 320.18 k` mm< N Z co cr):�--_ 0 318.1 EXISTI CROU D AT IERUNE o Cr 0 II o 31910 FMSR -GR AT _ - - " A WE2o o GRADE BREAK S A 0+91.:4 PED PATH cn D ± 316.2 09 w ELEV. 316.76 - - m D z o 316.17 =. 70 GRA.E BREAK Z m o '' STA 1+07.87 PED PATH n0M' O !/, ELEV. 31559 v Z 313.0 END P4.SIR PATH i- 313.04 MATCH BACK. S,DEW STA 1+38.45 POD PATH EL 311.04 I r 1 1 I>R t I i 0 0 0 g 0 0 0 m8 . +�, %, a - . OAK STREET ESTATES 12955 SW HERMANEERING ARDSSTU100LL�K TB = F 0 �s/� NAIATIN,OR 97062 o m NJz o PRELIMINARY STREET FP:503 563 6151 . 503.563 6152 4'm � G..j; :: NO. 2 SUBDIVISION aks-ng.com 0° 0 ' PROFILES 1 rtiING-NATURAL RESOURCES 4/ o i 1 TIGARD OREGON ENGINEERFORESTRY I-PLANNING'LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE .✓ TAX LOT 400 WASHINGTON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP 15 1 36AA II. R he 1 w� 1= CITY ®� TICARD 1w Approved y Planning I • ,I - - _ _ Date: aJ�/�(� � ' - TAX LOT 8300 c // LS �g�� • e - - - / Initials: g _ TAX YAP 1S 136M �1 fI g n § ¢c �r--#�I LOT 5 S A F o,,F a Ed / :•••'- ‘,_,1_-i w ) ` I I W II 11 11 T TAX LOT 9100 �N TAX LOT 2200 O TAX MAX 15 1 36M �R 1 ) 1 % LOT 13 a TAX LOT 8400 ,E9 1 TAX MAX 15 I 25DD Cn V I 1 /i I \ TAX MOISBI 36AA I LDT 13 y I I _ / 1� E I r Z bS Tr I 3 ` T s ! Q - 1 I Cl) I TAX LOT 2300 'I 1 1 TAX LOT 9200 I TAX MAR,S,25oD CO ��/// SCALE 1 = 30 FEET I I I TAX MAX 1S 1 360 I I LOT 14 Y/ ``" P_ ( LOT 14 / W > 30 0 12 111 z.30 I 1 / I S 1 I / TAX LOT 8500 l i 1 I H p ( z . TA%MAP IS 1 36M I I \\ LOT I 1 W II W TAX LOT 9700 I, i 1 CC N TAX MAX IS 136AA TAX LOT 9300 I I I TAX LOT 2400 F N LOT 19 TAX LOT 10200 i TAX MAP T 651 36M I TAX MAP IS 1 25DD TAX MAX 1S 1 36AA _ I LOT 15CO TAX LOT 8800 I1 W , O TRACT B I TAX MAP 1S 1 36AA TAX LOT 8600 EpNnECT COSMO Z ! LOT 10 TAX MAP 15 1 36AA Q +� TO E%1SA SANITARY SEVER MANHC E I LOT 6 Q Q G 7CC 1 TAX LOT 8700 m _ Q TAX LOT 9600 1 TAX LILOTS9 1 36AA �Z TAX LOT 2500 I- TAX MAX 15 1 36AA TAX LOT 9500 0 I 1 TAX LOT 9400 1 W TAX MAP 0T 161 25DD LOT 18 TAX MAP 15 1 36M I I I TAX MAX IS I 36AA I LOT 17 I I LOT 16 I Ii I • I � I - - (Cl) - - - - - - - .� ii - - o - - F I 111 CONNECT TO EIBS194G \- I - - IWAIER MAN `SANITARY IDA STORMWATER OUAUTY TRACT B to. TN- - - _s,_ - - CG-2 CATCH BASIN(TVP) ' •--1111 LATERAL PLANTER BOX(TSP) -11 ^O^ O I STORM MANHOLE(TTP) ® 7 - 11 1 1 1.. STORM LATERAL(TYP)� I�' �' 2 pA 1.... '� l-------;/ `" �. �. - w ! I TAX LOT 2600 V w TAX LOT 302 TAX LOT 300 I I ,--a PRIVATE STORY LATERAL(TVP) B CONNECT TO MAN NG TAX MAP AROT 1,1 2500 TAX MM IS 1 36M TAX MAP IS 1 36AA SANITARY LATERAL-= I I I I CONNECT PLANTER TO AREA DRAIN '. (TTP) I I - WATER SERNCE(TVP) n / w arm M � SANITARY SEVER MANHOLE J .1M11' • J/ 6 /T SANITARY CLEANOUT(TSP) I Q CC PRIVATE SMNTARIT O "" 2 $ " I LA1ERAL(TIP) / a� CONNECT TO E>osTlNc Z i S10RYWATER YAN ,I I SANITARY MANHOLE(TYPI !' q 4 ,/ I — — — — — — — I TAX LOT CONNECT TO STORM EXTEND EXISTING CATCH . L 1 I 5 TRACT A -- t-- - ---- ----- ___ SEVER STUB BASIN LEAD irk I 1 'S ` - - _ - _ 2700 _ _we `�1I e�� ,\ SANITARY LATERAL I I TAX MAR IS 1 25DO 11 LOT 18 a -- -Q `„,,,i...._ —__ SW 69TH AVENUE , 1 -_ ___ ® -'”- - - - - - -•ws - - - - - -�«- -- -�»- - - - c g - +�-�-- - -- ` -1, -..,- )-_ 1 - - T-.�_=Y'- _ W , o- -4 I-,n I DESIGNED Br. SRP I I I � 8I I DRAMBY SRP IAMR - - - -I - - 4 \\ 1 1/ I CHECKED BY AS NOTED TAX LOT I I I I — —� SCALE TAX LOT 2800 DATE:9/03/2015 303 t0NNEASING S TORM MANHOLE CONNECT TO EXISTING �� I i TAX MAP 15,25D0 T' TAY MAP IS 1 36M WATER PAIN STUB I LOT 19 APPROVED"OAK STREET ESTATES" \\ I I I I I "Yr-�G:� E SUBDIVISION(SUB 2014-001) I I' i I 1 � IJ 1 11{p1 � W • I mem DATE:11/30/17 I I II • .�� I TAX LOT 2900 4 Q .J i TAX MAPTISI 25DD ° I n I I 1J 1 I JOB NUMBER 4294--- - - -"—� - - r- - - --- - - -em- - - -�- -r�I SHEET g P09 Li M)W W Q LOT 21 r• \ TAX LOT 8500 1°sss( I :214J W I ::1111! g S I. \ / TAX YAP 15 1 36AA _ \ / LOT 7 10552 O 4 TAX LOT 9700 I TAX LOT 9300 TAX MAP 1S 1 36AA -- I TAX LOT 2400 11111 ' o LOT 19 TAX LOT 10200 TAX MAP IS 1 36AA _ TAX NAP 15,36M • LOT 15 EV TAX MAP 1S 12500 i • TRACT B TAX LOT 8800 LOT s TAX MAP 15 1 36AA TAX LOT 8600 10547 > Z N En LOT 10 TAX MAP 1S 1 36AA 10544 v<g S N F. S En :ate= 29- LOT V W cc I L�al3F a L.W 0 cc TAX LOT 8700 0541 1O658 b*4s1 Ll ri 2,6 TAX LOT 9600 N TAX NAP TS91 36AA 3538$ Z TAX LOT 2500 "�a4� W TAX MAP 15 1 36AA TAX LOT 9500 ! TAX LOT 9400 I W TAX MAP LOT 16'2500 Z r LOT 18 TAX MAP 1Si 36AA I TAX MAP,S 1 36AA > . LOT 17 LOT 16 �rrt- 10533 (5 4101691c167 1°304 \ 104`57*\ '418 0 (A CI) w 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - • O - - - - 10313- - - \ \, rvYL W646 LU �Y5 - - • L^_) 1Z 1020 I PRAREFIRE CRABAPPLE(TVP) I 11/ 1 1021 \ 'y,� BUILDING SETBACK PER �' • 0 1 d 110061 11 1001/ PRAREFRE CRABAPPLE(1YP) GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 1 0 \I 1 ( \/I I �� .\ FLOWU±E _ o I , , 1 ® I I n \ %6 I I I 36.°02 5F 7 '•. I \ I.�� \ 1 CO `N \ /1 46. SF Iili I 312.217 SF I \ 9 U `� .\ W / r CLOSED SOL VOLLRE;3'IDE 0 3'DEEP IRI. TW / I , \ \ \ (TIP)N„,,,:: J 17, ,'Al J f \ \\ I TAX LOT 2600 I- 0 ; 1005( , --_�.____ EXIST.CONIFER rRd \ TAX MAP 1S 1 2500W mTAX LOT 302 TAX LOT 300 \•. I\ lid I RAYWDOD ASI TTP 7 .// - - ! TO REMNN(TED) -' LOT 17 TAX MAP 1S 1 36AA TAX MAP 1S 1 36AA 10b41( �� ( ) ( 6/ /I MwM U, ` LV (ID\I , . ,V I ■ 3,0.499 SF 1022( I V L. 2 3 I I I Itti' � I � 1 OREGON NUE 0*(TTP) ' I \ \ �• N 36.091 SF ±6.123 SF I IiliD\ \ )11008 1 L_ J / 11 IO CD 50002 10p3' ,1 �- .� *�. :5 ' 1 `4. \. • -- - - - - - - J L RAYWOOD I �\ / 1 \N 36:73 SF I \� '•'�< \+[� ,D: ! e • \ TAX LOT O- Q Z ps°° vT 3 1000 1001 ASH(TSP) 1002 ( 1009 laTO _ -/ SW 69THAVENUE - �� t► - _ - 3,,,z47 SF �� . ��.. 2700 0; Q . -� - \ 3 1 \ TAX MAP OT'18 2500 3 A \ \I - , 031598 n15 0 �' -- \ t -.� 597 V./3 96 31 �� �- \ \ _ -_ , I \ - o �_______ _ L�_______- - ,31 3 \ • s° x1167 \ 66 `----...,____________ - - - - - - - _ _ - EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN(TVP) • 0 0 TAX LOT -, \ \ 7 1 303 APPROVED "OAK STREET ESTATES" \ \ TAS IPOsZ8 , D00 Z W TAX YAP IS i 36AA SUBDIVISION (SUB 2014-001) 1 F TRACT'A' 1 LOT 19 J W I in a Fr I > cr am LEGEND SCALE I' = 30 FEET PLANTED TREE CANOPY EXISTING TREE CANOPY < 0 TRIER SPECIES AL MIN AVERAGE MATURE CANOPY(P1( j QU/WFYIN�-511E CANOPY �'ANOPY(FT/�(F_QUALIFYING SITE CANOPY Z Z _ • ) TREfR SPECIES TOTA4$QIL VOLUME - • • 100) RAYWOOD ASH T OVER 500CF 30 SPREAD/707 SF 707 SF 10273 BIGLEAF MAPLE OVER 1,000 SF �SD SPREAD/1,963 SF 1,963 SF 5 Q QUALIFYING PLANTED MATURE CANOPY-COVER C 4 12 II 2130 1001 RAYWOOD ASH OVER 500 CF 30'SPREAD/707 SF 707 SF 10274 BIGLEAF MAPLE OVER 1,000 SF 50'SPREAD/1,963 SF 1,963 SF G 1002 RAYWOOD ASH OVER 500CF 30'SPREAD/7075F 707 SF 10370 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER LOCO SF RY SPREAD/707 SF 707 SF U LOT CANOPY COVERAGE 1003 RAYWOOD ASH OVER 30'SPREAD/7075F 7075E \ \ \ 10372 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER 1,000 SF 30 SPRFAO/7075F 7075E \\\ \ QUALIFYING EXISTING MATURE CANOPY COVER SOT LOT AREA(5F( REQUIRED CANOPY COVERAGE ISFl(1L5%L ACTUAL CANOPY COVERAGE ISE/%( 1004 RAYWOOD ASH OVER 500 CF 30'SPREAD/707 SF 707 SF 10382 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER 1,000 SF 30 SPREAD/707 SF 7075F W W \\ \\ 1 6,666 1,000 1,0215E/]5% 1005 RAYWOOD ASH OVER 500 CF 30'SPREAD/7075F 7075E 10383 DOUGLAS FIR OVER 1,000 SF 405PREAD/1,2565F 1,2565E M W 2 4091 914 1,4145F/23% 1006 RAYWOOD ASH OVER 500 CF(INCLUDING 45 CF CLOSED SOIL) 30'SPREAD/707 SF 707 SF 10384 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER 1,000 SF 30'SPREAD/7075F 707 SF /L^CL M APPROXIMATE OPEN SOIL VOLUME AREA 3 6,123 918 2,828 SF/4696 1007 RAYWOOD ASH OVERSOOCF(INCLUDING 45CF CLOSED SOIL) 30'SPREAD/707 SF 707 SF 10385 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER 1,000 SF 30'SPREAD/7075F 7075E 1,.L LL I REFER TO NOTE 5TNS SHEER 4 6,573 986 2,121 SF/3236 1008 RAYWOOD ASH OVER 500 CF(INCLUDING 45CF CLOSED SOIL) 30'SPREAD/707 SF 707 SF 10386 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER 1,000 SF 30'SPREAD/7075F 707 SF 4 5 11,326 1,699 2,828 SF/25% 1039 RAYWOOD ASH OVER SCO CF 30'SPREAD/707 SF 707 SF 10387 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER 1,000 SF 30'SPREAD/707 SF 707 SF 6 10,499 1,575 2,454 SF/23% 1010 RAYWOOD ASH OVER 500 CF 30'SPREAD/707 SF 707 SF APPRO%EMTE CLOSED SOL VOLUME MEA 10388 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER 1,000 SF 30'SPREAD/7075F 7075E , , , 4 F/72% 1020 PRARIEFIRE CRABAPPLE OVER 500CF(SITE TREE) 20'SPREAD/314 SF 3145E (REFU 10 NATE 5T/a SHEET) 7 12217 1833 883S10389 BIGLEAF MAPLE OVER 1,000 SF SO SPREAD/1,9635F 1,9635E •'••'•"" 8 6,032 903 1,021 SF/17% 1021 PRARIEFIRE CRABAPPLE OVER 503CF(SITE TREE) 20'SPREAD/3145F 314 SF 10391 BIGLEAF MAPLE OVER 1,185F SO SPREAD/1,963 SF 1,963 SF TRACEA 4,959 744 45,116 SF/910% 1022 OREGON WHITE OAK OVER 50OCF(SITE TREE) 50'SPREAD/1,963 SF 2,454 SF(1.25 NATIVE CREDIT) 10392 BIGLEAF MAPLE OVER 1,000 SF SD'SPREAD/1,963 SF 1,963 SF - - - HAMER TREE INTIM CANOPY OUTLINE TRACT B 2,848 427 10,682 SF/375% PLANTED TREE CANOPY SUBTOTAL 10,859 SF 10396 RED ALDER OVER 1,000 SF 25'SPREAD/491 SF 491 SF MINGTREE MAMIEECANOPY MOLINE NOTE OPEN SOL VOLUMES INCLUDE SOIL CHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY PLWTNG STRP. WHERE OPEN SCE VOLUME WITHIN THE RICHT-OF-WAY FALLS BELOW TIE 10416 BIGLEAF MAPLE OVER 1,000 SF SO SPREAD/1,963 SF 1,9635E RIGOR IV SRP MINIMUM 500 CF REQUIRED PER TREE,3''WIDE BY 3'DEEP CLOSED SOL PATHS'ARE USED TO MEET RIESE STANDARDS BY OPENING UP NEW AREAS OF AVAILABLE 10419 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER 1,030 SF 30'SPREAD/7075F 707 SF GENERAL NOTES: 'OPEN'SQL THESE CLOSED SOIL PATHS SHOULD BE CENTERED ON THE TREE TRUNK AND ARE INDICATED ON THE PLAN.REFER ALSO TO SECTION 12-STREET TREE 10440 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER 1,000 SF 30 SPREAD/707 SF 707 SF DRAWN BY SRP TOTAL NET OEVHDPED SITE AREA 73,3045.F.N. I. ALL TREES AND PLANTINGS TO CONFORM TO THE CITY OF TIGARD DESIGN STANAAROS. PLANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOL VGAUME STANDARDS AND APPENDIX 14 DETAIL AND EXAMPLE COVERED SOL VOLUME SPECIPCABONS IN THE URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL 10462 SWEET CHERRY OVER 1,003 SF 25'SPREAD/491 SF 491 SF CHECKED BY. MH TOTALCIIALFYNS MATURE TREE CANOPY AREA 78.319SF STANDARDS ADOPTED BY THE OREGON LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS BOARD(OLCB). ALL STREET TREES SHALL HAVE(2) 10507 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER 1,000 SF 305PRFAD/7075F 7075E AS NOTED %CNDPY COVER 107% 10'LONG%I8•DEEP ROOT BARRIER INSTALLED ADJACENT TO BOTH THE CURB AND THE SIDEWALKS. CENTER ROOT PLANTSCHEDULE WARN%CANOPY COVER 40% BARRIER ON TREE TRUNK. DOUBLE STAKE ALL STREET TREES. STAKES STALL BE PARALLEL TO STREET. REFER TO 10520 RED AIDER OVER 1,000 SF 2$'$PRFAO/4915F 4915E DATE 9/03/2015 CITY OF TIGARD STREET TREE STANDARDS. 10521 RED ALDER OVER 1,000 SF 25'SPREAD/491 SF 491 SF 71 2. PLANTING PLAN MAY BE CHANGED DUE TO AVAILABIUTY,COST,ONSITE CONDITIONS,ETC.BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TREES ut BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ',47F/CONTAINER 10522 RED ALDER OVER 1,0005E 25'SPREAD/491 SF 491 SF ...,`C- ION G GREATER THAN THE MALAWI'OF 40%TOTAL CUAUFYING MATURE PRIOR TO FINAL INSTALLATION,AS ALLOWED UNDER OTY STANDARDS. `Q' CANOPY COVER FOR THE SITE TIEREFC E CITY REQUIREMENTS ARE MET 3 REFER ALSO TO SUPPLEMENTAL ARBORIST REPORT. 10523 BIGIEAF MAPLE OVER 1,000 SF SO SPREAD/1,%35F 1,9635E \` P Q` 4 INDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNERS RESPONSIBLE FOR IRRIGATING TREES FRONTING LOIS. 2 4ALU5%'PRARIEFNRE PRAIRIEFIRE CRM APPLE I I/2•CAL.BIS 10524 BIGLEAF MAPLE OVER 1,0005E 505PREAD/1,9635F 1,9635E \�C(�Gam\ F. NOTE SEE COVER SLEET FOR GENERAL PLAN LEGEND 5. SOILS: REFER TO SECTION 12 AND APPENDIXES OF%ARDS URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL REMOVAL,STORING,AND 31161 BIGLEAFMAPLE OVER LOW SF SO SPREAD/1,963 SF 1,963 SF Q� p�0,,J AMENDED SOILS FOR PUNIER AREAS;BLENDED SQL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION;COVERED SOL MATERIALS,COVERED 31163 BIGLEAF MAPLE OVER LOCO SF 50'SPREAD/1,9635F 1,963 SF Q `�� SOL MIXING PROCEDURES;AND COVERED SOL PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO OTY OF 11GMD STANDARDS. MINNUM 31165 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER 1,000 SF 30 SPREAD/707 SF 707 SF WIDTH OF CLOSED SOL AREAS TO 3 FEET. 6. NUMBERED FASTING TREES ON PLANS THAT ARE OFF-SITE ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE TREE CANOPY CALCULATIONS AND , OUERCUS GARRYANA OREGON WHITE OAK 1 1/2'CAL.B&B10 31168 WESTERN RED CEDAR OVER$,ODD SF 30$PREAD/7075F 71775E G� 'i _ y 1HOR CANOPY AREA IS NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. - 31233 RED AIDER OVER 1,000 SF 25'$PRFAD/4915F 491 SF -7 STREET SIDE PLANTER STRIPS STALL HAVE NINNIKINNICK GROUNOCOYfR UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE RENS%Ns -� 50000 OREGON ASH OVER 1,(100 SF 305PREAD/7075F 707 SF I. BRUCE R. BALDWN. ATTEST THAT THIS �, �'� ARCHTECT AND QTY. STREET TREES AND KINNIKINNICK TO BE PLANTED AND MA NTAINED BY INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS EXISTING SITE CANOPY SUBTOTAL 33.7305E%2=67A605F TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL PLAN �'%�� WHERE FRONTING LOTS. MEETS ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS IN -�1 jlE6((�z. STREET TREES TQ1' BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/CONTAINER ET. SECTION 10, PART 1, OF THE CITY OF -1 $LIEU FRONTAGE 566 1F A;REWIRED STREET TREES 14 JOB NUMBER TIGARD URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL. Q �CERiFED IIIII 4294 11 FRA/ONUS OXYCARPA'RAYW000' RAYWOW ASH 2'CAL.0±8 SHEET AAFiBOF�ST BRUCE R. BALL) IN P10 ffi BRUCE BALDWIN,CERTIFIED ARBORIST m ,< NOTE 11 STREET TREES ARE PROPOSED FOR THE SUE. AN ADDITIONAL IN UEU Cr FEE FOR 4 TREES WILL PNN-6666A �NIVG GD "7'�7" BE PND TO MEET THE 14 STREET TREE REOUREMENT FOR THE SITE �z heo2 • Z (------- LEGEND \ 1I ffN„,tt Ilt •„ >• . 530 FOOT BOUNDARY FROM SUBJECT PROPERTY ,�„ —-—-— EXISTING SWEET I I y• i dig EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION ”'= • - ■ STREET INCLUDED IN PROJECT II b,F .1175 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION j / CONCEPTUAL FUTURE STREET H16:LA o W 2 (NOT PROPOSED-SEE NOTES 1&2) // I / I I Z`y{ I / j / \ cn W W ori NOTES: I / I / \ F— Z 1. TRIS CONCEPTUAL FUTURE STREET CONNEC11NTY PLAN HAS KEN PREPAREDcr TO MEET THE SUBMITTAL REWMIDENTS OF THE WY OF%CARD SEC110N ` / \ 0 18.810.030.F FOR A SUBDPASIDI APPIJCAPCN. r______7_.__________ I _ 2. IRE'CONCEPTUAL FUTURE STREET CONNECTIVITY PIAN'IS FOP ILLUSTRATIVE _—_—_—_.-_-_-_-_-_-__ __-F____- -—_ ''^^ PURPOSES ONLY FOR THE LAND USE APPUCATION AND 6 NOT PLANED.CR / / Cr) V/ - BI ERE IN ANY WAY I / I I / \ w / 3 I THERE ARE NO TRI-MET BUS ROUTES,PUL WTS,OR ODER TRANSIT FACILITES MTINN 530 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE. I I WCI m j / \ I \ w D r� I — H N SCALE 1" = 80 FEET v'W �- Cl) O NO 60— •61• I I —I.Lli-I ¢ I /' Y Z I I N TRACT B I / I Q D jj - - - i o Q CD i ® 7 I 0 _____________ _ _ _ I I—.=1 SW 69TH AVENUE 2 3 : ' i / 6 �I I • rt-------- �.` SW 69TH AVENUE __J ' L _4 5 'BRACT A ZI> Q ~ — —. >1 in I W a Wjj r — _ \ >I °C } Ne, I I I / > > I 1 _________ ell \ 1-. L tiiii 1 _ _ _ , F_ t., co!\ 1 I NI I...... 1 a ..., W \ I \ I ix. al l / z \ SW 67TH AVENUE '�.. SW 67TH AVENUE 1 \ • / U LLJ V \ I \ _- - - - ---\ ?IW V o W 1 — Nj / \ cn \ I i \ ,\ I \ I IIESICIED BY SRP �\ DRAIN BY SRP �� \ SC er. AMNi / I .\ L SCµ.; AS NOTED, 1 DATE:9/03/2015 •\ SW 66TH AVENUE / SW 66TH AVENUE \ �--_ --. I I k' V'� �ER H I1L W1L 6/30/17• II RE11SCOIS9g15 E.— JOB NUMBER 4294 SHEET i P11 CITY OF T'GA",ID OAK STREET ESTATES NO. 2 I f Crilfil PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PLANS Approve;.: . Panning W 11 c5 /40 lir Date: l IG Igne, [Fe(e( Initials: LS ,:..4!";, Zn• �y/J� 0r 11.1 IX i ~2222.. APPLICANT Q Z 0 •_ PROJECT BIGGI CONSTRUCTION Q t rERrrRr•T \ 511E I }} --- --_-- _____ __ 11605 SW NORMANDY LN N t I I I I I I ' TRACT B WILSONVILLE OR 97070 LU > c cv ee + 1 1_ o / CIVIL ENGINEERING/SURVEYING/NATURAL LLI m .0.211.`^ .— 2 3 6 I RESOURCE/PLANNING/ARBORIST/LANDSCAPE —II 1 CO 4 ARCHITECTURE FIRMCC I— CNl P i - - t 5 TRACT A 1 ABs CONTACT EERNG&F,FOAJCRESTRY, N Q "^"'"e` a �b 11\ r"OM NAME ___L_—_ 12965 5*HERMAN ROAD,SURE 100 Y Z \ TUA ATIN,OR 97062 s. ' \\ -- -- \ I PH:503-563-6151 ` �N•°'° � �' I FAX 503-563-6152 0 5B �•°� / SITE MAP F VICINITY MAP 1..100' NOT TO SCALE LEGEND I =MkMEM EX1 B& MN= I- Q DECIDUOUS TEE Q Q Tw.N SEER CI.QMm„0.,,ma 41. 31... ORAL Z:w ° ` SHEET INDEX 2 PRE N,DR�wT a • s1tlb SEER 1NM LE o P01 - COVER SHEET MTH VICINITY SITE MAP w W RR W WE Y '• w* m E P02-EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN LU ~ Kip PAL" • N • GUY•E TTN°'OTT P03-PREUMINARY PLAT AND SETBACKS PLAN PROJECT LOCATION: 6909 SW OAK STREET 2 N DOUBLE 5110 VALE PDEPOLE E TIGARD,DR 97223 (n ,>- M RELEASE TALE q 'f PRIER NALRI PO4—PREUMINARY DEMOLITION PLAN I'•" OUT `OTTER MOM BOX P05-PREUMINARY TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL PLAN AND TABLE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: TAX LOT 400(WASHINGTON COUNTY w Z 4.04A.SER EwnE O • POWER PEDESTAL . ASSESSOR'S YAP IS 1 36AC LOCATES IN V mNrRr ms NALLT PO6-PREUMINARY GRADING PLAN 1 sway WIT T T '"TTS'"°�ERa'°p1 • P07-PREUMINARY STREET PLAN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 36, Q .ER TT m �.RRNN.N.:RISER 1. P08-PRELIMINARY STREET PROFILES WILLAMEITTE MP 1 ERIDIAN,WASHITH,RANGE 1 NGTON EST, V > 000-0,114P09 - PREUMINARY COMPOSITE UTILITIES COUNTY.OREGON ` amr-a- T Lie —-- -— —- P9ff4g4--— RDT P10- PREUMINARY SITE TREE CANOPY PLAN EXISTING LAND USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPERTY ONE P11 - CONCEPTUAL FUTURE STREET CONNECTIVITY PLAN PROJECT PURPOSE: SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL 8 COMM -- -- LOT SUBONSION IN THE R-4 5 DISTRICT 010LIT ITT STIP DK. -.-.-. DATUM: -- ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON HOLDING cwN man uE EDGE OP P.SEIENr ----- -- -- WASHINGTON COUNTY BENCHMARK 822 4.LL As NM SEEE ALSO STAMPED"CITY CF PORTLAND o N/Ds/zms TA Ewa EK - _ 8M/4181"LOCATED N A MONUMENT BOX AT THE INTERSECTION ":::.41" .:' aGRA.010 OF SW TAYLORS - FERRY ROAD AND SW 65111 ASEUNE. s....4., JG -._ ELEVATION OF BENCHMARK IS 480.60' 0.00•[ - 4 . MAIMGATIONT LK -_. 13/411 ALE uxn, TIER WIC uc - - ALrsRn \ SANT 4ER uE ----------_ .. ". WEER EER \WO LK -———., —— } 4294 SHEET P01 CITY OF TIGARD ApprovedPla lning Q Date: a� / /0 le ig 0 1 1 1 1 I� 1N mn n a Ls o, I I I ) NEP tPI'�(Irsl W II IItIQ IS. / s 'B zy 50 �1 _�1 r �_ = TAX LOT 9100 le ods }' 1,1 1 '*I' ,r Nr ISI Nr ' / ' TAX LOT 2200 1E 1 I 1 d LOT 13 d 5 TAX LOT 8400 1 ,r viii Imo _„ � 4` 1 ,r Nr TSISN. L gee .ANY wc1ANNc wL 'j11 I 1 \ ISL. y� ' I ....WIN:.s,N 2 vd u�n l emM F .48, J ..-EL'.!-,t TAX LOT 9800 Pm.5-SAN urs 11 TAX LOT 9200 ) 1 TAX LOT 2300 Zi ,r Nr Is1 80X n r w. L0T 10 KO.EIM.ANL -i t'',i TM Nr Is I ar 1 O- TAX LOT 9900 1 ,1 1 1 '4!' LOT 14 I 1 1 O'% " mi �° T �.srw 1 / 1 1 1 W UJ. `OTT »r% I j am'— — TAX LOT 8500 /.., I!.e➢I r'i LL� �g f%m .� fN lets ii 1 1 1 / LU Kr15 T7 NM ,I I I F. Z Qi E'0117 mC0(1611 ' 1 1 1 1 Ig 10552Ie Q TAX LOT 9700 rtec WIT E u¢Yui .0 1 I I pI �__�� %w 2S CO'I' TAX w s l 3050 -. 11 TAX LOT 9300 7 -1600 ! A I (A LOTN sm1Y uTEMK ( 1 u KM 15 I aA. 1f1A.ii.SNL II TAX LOT 2400 TAX LOT 10200rf1 As-NKrs I. ` .15 TAX Nr 151= W` TAX YO..M IS 9 aM NI SN AO ' 1 -P 1 I vxsuNlK 1 TAX LOT 8800 ImA7 Lar Is r c mo.9, - I - N1,,_Ks I T s I Nr TAX LOT 8600 m1A j, LI sr w E OUT 30363(01.) �J .s,Yw ! for 10 Tr WP ISI ar I QQQ �Q„AI��/// 150% W CCI 1N 300. �I LOT 11 0 EM 74315 WS) nam sMNr oarANz uvpi [N U1t) yyI 1, I t I [OUT 24316 1910 /W� y A06 MAra 301E [CUT 299 1 s'a y r 5111 101 CC nm'u- - - 'll s. TAX LOT 8700 1A[% mN 1 I = e . TAX LOT 96D0 s i TAA APR151,AA [►inaOM l... ! % TAX LOT 2500 N N �= TAX LOT 9500 I I e . b6' 11 TAX LOT 9400 —50W N.N.lrr 11 f is z«n p w A Y V IS I mo Z TAX for ie NAA a i ,r INr s 1 Nr g I I T.e Yr s I ar u s>Mt z4a fm 130 Or 11 LOT le fASEaNT MO MOp'PRIVATE f cur 217%OM 1. IL 1%1011[41II. Z 8� Sr LARK I. TONY 6rWR LAMENT 1 I�. BN6 RElrfa I 1 115913 �,,� 4C 0 --—-- R. ( P6 AS-NKrs _ { O 3050 1mis - W 1 50'55"" N C N Wu N3' CC -- -- ----- eMtlN"°Ey 5050© - - op6lq¢ --. *4461 " I 1 \ .0". V5 �rtNu __ � SIN wm_ tam 1o[E T ��1 6AK1. + NOM N2% `Mrs -e4,-N. t NNE rua E SU ! '.aneili�m "�`�3��� \\� T ib5aE1 _ �' �';, h+� .nr.xF ( IN - w 3111 I, 1 `'t 1:2d W V ")-." ;;":--.,,.--...,.',.?,.7414:,..., 1,60 I0 i� �.- � 1 \ (-� W. Y WT mlf ' ( �Usrl v ILWAmI uN RUMENs ` \\5\\\�X\� �4p to I r} 1a.seIN,FELwDLD AR) 1 Ili0oNm�\ 11 11. 1 I r:-:, (,I f.? 1. INss>Fss N.g la#r)l�'-3 • �"�I I rs f OUT 144,5(1539) TAX LOT 2600 I/) TAX LOT 302 TAX LOT 300 �� 1 ernr� ///s:60 1 • SNP 244 75 TAX 11.4P TA.wN 1S I Nr Tr IMP 15 I NAA TAX LOT 400 O O"' m%l� °°e �._ u N r o° Z 1 Ob01e rA5E5M[IlrrNlTuooc � 1 +xwr151N.. GRAVEL Aa .,j//// 3y�yy ; I - -1 :V"' 24162 0 -,q 10osms%I 10079 0 ,® , O 1 3' 1 lll4�ll J I1 J r 1 ,� r- --o'I H �5 s � R ! 10078 ,dol 'III m50 111�`Ellilill lll( \l`I I I' ,SLR \ T f I I Q [N:SR%.Iel) W 0 -,0,,,,,),,,,\,,,,,,,,,„*„: , IdS\I Illl�l11 a>% III , E N.314 59 1m k DI Ib II I 0 I Z Z -___ fWr_..79111311 A J e4,12: lYw \ II,„ al i' 0 Cr 1 �� TAX LOT ! f N 56 (0'50) 1 1 1 �QAAA� U J _ � E N m5 115) 1 1 0 - 1 1 2700 //.R{ a EWT. f2'1.J O' '' �,�, \' 1 TAX OP 1512500 v - - r.[,rtNCE 1 ''''0 n'" 1,,,.65.0 smss �,1 \'d ' , 1 r a.n Lor Ie Z OIoOr 11 _ .._ 500'99 � dJ�s9aa�t�.�"A7_QrFis+ m1� s1h I: 1 '�i [NT1 257 50 w0ua' sl _flf3% ___ 1i v — w SW A -"'t' A _ -r-.7-- _ (n .N 5N,, �r -_— y_; _ _ -�_` L \ yO.'065 11 d 1167 )I -I E CUT 328 49 111111 I -avNa7n .�Sr W L --t-''''\. A. EX SAN w III 1,. I .I X fN SM)3IES) I 17 �•. - �w , �Sm SLE NIP GSNO51 y W '[0R.JA.a(5111 _..1 A{NN.204 65 UN114I FOR M NWT NOM E N 296511E51 I I TAX IDT 1 1 1 ; _ I' �- J f.:Ale Urry ,.....o-,',24,,, I" - varA1 m 1 5090" IE OUT MR ' [ r n p1111 SERVICES)PER 5119 w PAGE N 11 I,I'T u sr w TAX LOT 2800 MEL f W 19 Ma IIYS) I I 1 w u r N 1151 mo 1 11owX5 1i4 IN eA�a IM41W.a Oran LOCATE rn7 n I X111 +1 .fS AS 1.0'KfTE BY ORM PROMO POI YIUtt ,[N 254 rss47 On) r"")."0)!'4 1 n n6E1 150.40 NE SUNOCO w1ES NO [N.m ursl 1 'I 1(4 1 r'1[ r,a5NO MIN I LOCATE MAT5030 l: ,< Nevi¢ M N.M.OlaulwNw lOGRS WNW TEE 1101 I , 1 FO.mEN[S N 1f A.CO.NA[ MER 9.58E f N 311 53 NP51 I I / ON wNNN ALL MOM fOPIbMS .EME N. LEGEND [OUT 30610(1331 ;iI I i [M 5J0�%113511 l�',� ;� I •,•-. 9n z F.50501 WAS EOIOtt',f0 rtmury n-a.xls ' 111:I` 1 ::501:I6'wll om 10Ami CONSTRICTION 15 ro o 1 1 - - As NOTED 0 144 AC 1A6QEN1 \ \ I I, I f OUT.79 nrq NO loco- -1 I I it'I 1 I I 1 art 9/03/2015 A 5 501 N o. EREOCNIAIN AO 142 LEVATIONS NE ME GINNER OF n \ I I 11 11 11 1++ 1 I I I TAX LOT 2900 P.r NLL 0050 ME.NIx A NOa n E1[YATEIN 6 Nem FEET -- I J NW MD SW 1 Il l 1 1 it NM IS 1 9m D .r.., 5030 14/E NES ROT COMMUTE.116650 wary mxlcr. umxc calw�f suarMn L--11'1 � 1 '-Lldi Gills 2- r1)1,i 1111 1 1 1 11\1.I I a,m s�a ������� AAHY 15 ONLY NW NN MOORS STNV Na vaAnMf. --1. , - " "_ ..-..- .-' ••_-- . lL LL �,, °MING 1 011 N,5 APE.10.10 SNNL 6.EESS NOM SLOPES 101 50r 25% .SOM.MN WES..NWINN4 I 6. ,...ry/IT aulLONG TES .1445 SLOPES>25% ca1OAN N1.vN IS I FOOT 6NIA6E.01 MANE AMA ACRES COLON suErr 1 MET 9 OILY 11[05 NA.A NAYERR 6 6'MD QFAU.1GN.1f0 .15MN 5 .O. ,.E6 MEER AT BREAST 1406140610EEON SLW[Am AT MS ME ' 4294 WEE PO2 CITY OF TIGARD Approvec' t,f F; nningII Date: cQJQj /(p 1 ,ili :1 PEII9TY .„..„.lI0N5 REWIRE,SE,„, -- Initials: / �& g8 GROSS 911 MEA ea.SN v(Lw Act MO m Fr ` - -- - - -- - TAX IMPIS1ie 8300 / r (� a NAM RO'N.DEMEANOR 1,287 Sr 1021 A20 rROXf,MME m 1•r fors ; N;c. 4mES,25S ISaS Sr MI5 AG)-T.EA51NO MORONS RVA) , SIRE r.SCE MAD ,R 1 / g r A Mr 4.01413E AREA 37 657 SFTT3 ) REM OM 15 Fr I W I s1Nr' li mN91Y TRANSFER i5N5'10 Ulm.f3�14 yen' E) 3T2a.. MAL Kr Pal 4 TAX LOT 9100 g 1 TAX LOT 2200 Z flnec 11.2131 YM ISi ISM YARN 031 AREA s 000 s 5 Lm u a I\ TAX LOT 8400 I I TM Yr IS 1 210 NNYu1 AYoua LOT MEA (510 4 CUM TIRE \ S MX YMIS 1 36M Lm 1] MOM LOT MOT (eine WA).sl-8513•e LOTS ' CO UJ WNW LOT DENSITY a 23 LOIsY6OSl=6.58-7 Lon MASS ROM DELTA OMR OIU1 ^ j W YMARN AvfRA6E Lal WS m R C1 MOP WNW 2190' 511,315E 167,' 1 M.O.Lor sx911' amrs c2 1,03 Nas um' X,sv,st u1• 5 y TAX LOT 2300 Q Z O M.O.As.XAa m1•Mu la.0 siga ism)-ams TAX LOT 9200 1•M r�rs 2� �_ MORO.O&M LOT AIA 1003 4 Cl 400 ...ear 1•U' N3S2'bT 183 TM YM 15 1 36NA CII WO n.rlr am' NeU1NT 24.43 Lm 1. N N 1 I TAX LOT 8500 W Ir]NVO'S i]eM _ Q SCALE CO r-30 FM TAX LOT 9700 WW TAX OUP ISISM TAX LOT 9300 TAX LOT 2400 U) LOT 19 TAX TAX LOT 10200 r'wiO115 xM W M RAP;,'2803 N .0 It I TAX LOT 8800 F TMYPISInAA TAX LOT 8600 ¢ o o W 10 TAY I LOT. C Z V W GCi O¢ TAX LOT 8700 m CrCC J M YM I5 1 1M 1- TAX LOT 2500 0 TAX LOT 9600 3 y TAX LOT 9400 me Z YM1S1 mo Q TAX YM 151 26M TAX LOT 9500 WW 2222 LOT C7 0 Laren M YM 15 1 NM 555 K1 INA �.4 TOLOT 56 N __ 5'SIX OM SUB.IGT)-` � � __�___ __ __ - Mann N.m' CI ymL -A �---i asLo11 iMC rwi :;070,,,"''''''7 'mall RMD/cMAaE I '"s TRACTA4B .B Z s s 1 :em' tsar R I j i 1 sreAa Iro1 7 A I , , 1 1 MM/4 fl2 Y 1m]6'Y'E R1.le' Q I 1 1 5'SOF Tar SEWN[mph J. 1030.525 MIS MASS MD • 20 YAAp 5 Q Smx3aruor•REAR� vrreirts 1•l '1 '----'savgrarnra--1. •' �h— wmn�et nou-11 42 TAX LOT 2600 J J TAX LOT 302 TAX LOT 300 r r41eiai jT9) uvP1B1Co1i MITI I �_, •�•�•� �•���Y �R T m'se5a 1/"aaoriu'X°ENOX°p.1 y a�iorT 26 1 1500 d a TM YM n 1 mA. 1•A,IMP 1S 36M �1 (Src.Ao 1 g¢ "_`,9►�,�`'''� �.41"v oaenair55, �'�514 1e.�• 1 • 1 �DXmx'ut 10388' a Y I 1'x\1}.-. EI =WO/1371,'♦♦ LOTS 6-e 7 r 6 1 N Ey 9 ^� , R1a7 r,YmlwNa 1 e g i Mu 1•1115:MOSS ROLE) 1 •$ • 's Q cC PI 13.091 4 EE['' :6.1134 1 a .try) 1 5� L 1 Z CO p 1 4 YOUCSlT 116oC-__� NOW 381160 F.. ---- ----- 1 1 1444E mil 1 1 1 ams '' m'4[1•8.13 n2'rmZ TAX LOT W so fFDA17ARRjV1FML- 1 J 419.301(rot 1 I I I- D'm' < :ILSs 1 TRACT A 2700 W N _ Sia -.) � MYM151 moCC — —__ em em Row!am C3 J �� 1 m1•le OTa D -IESH • 1033' ' CL 1 Imoa'm a6e1 I nm � 5 AANn vs TAX LOT ".� TAX LOT 2800 91/1 0221 \ YM 1I 2503 n. AS XOIm TAXI.03 LOT a one 03/2014 s1 w APPROVED"OAK STREET ESTATES" ►- I RorE`:^"C} SUBDIVISION(SUR 2014-001) 1 w 1 1 L°Ao • �� 1 '.1'.$§" � e � J TAX LOT 2900 .61.",/N/1, 6 M IS 1 IWO I i iM Ymim JOB MISER 4294 SHED P03 CITY OF TIGARD Approved by PI(Q/9//0 a ning II Date: . i, NOTES �. - SW 70TH PLACE Initials' .. r / LS 0 lii 1 TMd,mMoR w emwwnrz IC Rr»,vu OF.0 rcrrss»r vmvert ununes nIR fi„ 2 44511E sIWtiNSs TO ll.0.PR..011 LOCH,21AR.40 MOM f I MOM EmE I :I T s¢R4rRn0..mm 0asorvRr4R nu 0m24.11.us,u m¢s TO RE -- 1 I 1 --—_`` o / 11,n€ Room LAO R.oWmRWW, . ( w ----- ____ TAX LOT 8300 / e. R 11 i I t' ru ry 151 364 v2se i l M---is 1 LOT�y /15 i_ oR fl i 11I II U I / Zs O 'SCALE TAX LOT 9100 919 i 1 I 1 4»s,zu ) ; ' I TAX LOT 2200 N W I 1 L1 X mr u / ' TAX LOT 8400 I u LOT 13 2me W 2 TAX ilL- Lass l i Z ROI RET4W14 R. 1 I // Q O } 6�� / i 17 f.. TAX LOT 9800 I.1 1 1 I TAX LOT 2300 WRAP 1s 13Ru I +< I I TAX LOT 9200 I i -+ W mT M ROI RET»WX:44L I ( r»R»15 1 300.4 ' I O TAY kW 1„2� TAX LOT 9900 ? 1 I I t Lor11 TAX 4»151 xu �I 1 .1 II I Lma 1 1 1 TAX LOT 8500 i i r-1 W m 't ' i ‘'T I uR�rs21>w. II -' LU - 4 I"a II I- Cr) TAX LOT 9700 M00 , it I I 1 f� fI N TAX 164115 1aRu I ' d TAX LOT 9300 I s 1� TAX LOT 2400 LOT IL TAX LOT 10200 I i "11°,0.,1,1"" I uvrslxmo Toa 4».ci a mu 1 1 1 r I W 1m is Z 1 TAX LOT 8800 T6644151364 LOT w 30u TAX LOT 8600 Q I T 4 wine 300. i S i 1 O 2 --I j II 1 Q 604 1Er41w 441 II II -�_� �_ 6C0 MK-. I TAX LOT 8700 CO';I AA TAX LOT 9600 TAX LOT 9500 ,1 ; h TAX SOT 9400 UAW 151 1 TAX LOT 2500 ~ TAX wrml30ui LOT O 12500 LOT le 1611146161364 I ti o,1 1 36 {.1 I 1 W oris ?M ♦— M0, -Q—_______,_ __ - DEM Rmunc.41 Z __ ----------- _ 111.RRC[ r r SMUT 4016000.CE 171e1- MVS - 1rocII W,u< — JIJ Lm n 1 C-"' JaL RcuT uo I I I`N , °" 5004 i # p 0 : d - rE 1614 MOE 1ame .0 30 I R1amVAC ldEi - \ 1501,0_ ---......0,4611,0,4,66.- O i +aw-b,_ -4- r O Wv1 I i I KV% 2 �a re-505001450 Pe30o}� 0 I I J 11111/".5 LU && 40044E OA.- � �Wm rtvnnr n14.30o,s1 I I Z C" _ umra. _ .. sROM re "��`p0�lus.p w3e2* ,ao:*,, I I.-s ,,1 TAX LO60 T 1226000 Q TAX LOT 302 TAX LOT 300 TAX LOT 400 �bt+i m2eOO'>n y 041 LOT 2 r0X SW 15 1300.4 ru4»Is,au. 'R L - d ObO a ` 3.1140,1.51114,- ,.,Y»65,%ee ' 4»4{ , , 'r G4'IBIr t r•-'I Z 9Fe TIO A41-Wtl1{1 _ 1 I A 1� I--1'�-1 Z m Qy f 'mm�'(� Ruu4(wIFA O ROGER 1[191 I ,mae R„9a ,r .I i i —-- --—–– R I 0 SW4ERW1 I I 1 Sy"t I. I 110.r wlolErE },pr,,�M ** *i kp„ !I I i TAX LOT X I ii +c sumr NO- I unmc sr4.:RR 0.0 /1 i..III" 0 O r11144' 11 I I TAX 112»5015 1 002400 a � - f O 'we:roec - �1a ' V( Lala„ ' Op31a42 O O I , ` � :� 1 € �.s,.. – �y 9�' Old _ ,.1 ec nmmE 15010 ra eO�I n[wsE a ` -It 5 NO 4 �` S'11_ AV d ., �P TAX LOT —1 _ RMrz Rro1 5014. ' ii " TAX LOT 2800 303 1l'' TAX w3 15 am Y I I Ii'' II a »1s 1 TAX 1s� .N\. Gi II' J 1 E I I I � I I;1 Wm ���I;I ? _ �I�lil i �r� TAX kV LOs12 00 JCS NUMBER " 4294 SHEET PO4 ---- • // \\ PRM. 9',2LEGEND11 ola5 Tw17.1.0.0011&..110.11.4. � [WOW PNM.COMM(5 Fn RI1 ' ¢ I B;N.,: ...N 2 R19T.dT.[CONTOUR n m Menne, E03.... ..M,A.u.. °.41.07.. Nen'.. WW1 GR.D..Is m i5- Idu I 1 ~P_ Rn.. MIS.CONFUCIUS ME[ # I � J.A.M.I 11307. Wm 30 M� a_ �' 1 I D.. Merl. B Mem a.e EM5111.0X0.6 AFF 0 1.0•10 04 M N �@ 1 i Tx MOVAL X X __I W w ,.war.fir. u rte.,.• 1/;11,',,,`"% W tel . _ E MM \\ nME cD1O aH0 v,.d _ _ 5�s TIRE PROTECTION RNR ` F I i 4 450 war � J W iasx L, CRH �aA rl.. .w. imm Z A 0\`\ onO. 4FR\MMGwME UIDPYxum �\�\ \� I • . MM.. CO 01 a1 .AM4AAIX 1 . oNPN!N W cc§NTE COM 9¢T aAuxRw IED0 u rt¢oREP C MO* Mame OBS Z�. T62 - TOM .1, GJJ 10013 ..._ 11 VT. Ef1,00/11.0an • . .,...... ,. r. 0'.1°.4.00°„ W >� � . TEN N... Pi Nome 1013. 130300.0r 41 PnWerre i._. C'sI • • °row, . ;s`\ Ilj�(IIq[1�1�8 \`, �,1 tr_.� s �t1� •'I ARB.s1 COMMA.Rauro umNc ALL TOM I '" N _ 3 l •6 , ` �,�,���'q,,4� ......,,....„.t, l AR Rdwu MK AEE PROTECT.RNR -i m ` Soa: 0 21.113 5F 11 Et[,IEI f'-•ie�I \'AO.�.,. .?►� .. 7 ...M rr �X 4 * s+ or .00..1. 0 OC WM Mime. /17 m •4 m R10303-„. _ . \-k SW 89iH AVENUE -61te. . - ....�. ( s \\ y�� # ,wv`R \N • .dr b y SW 69TH AVENUE h \\ �� M..M. .w W Q W Z I O APPROVED"OAK STREET ESTATES" . Z Z 10802 Ikuplia* SO 11.40.0 TREE PROTECTION NOTES SUBDIVISION(SUB 2014-001) 1 F- Bp.M.M. _ Q Q A NO aM¢5.DI M NAC,0 DTE ASPECT 0 M DNROWD crew FORESTRY Mew.0811 MOM COME.TRW M PROWc1 MHNSr 001 an AMORIST F••• •' mos Bpr4Aw 10 1R. _ CC Q Q Z B Mr PROTECTION SHALL E NiTxlm PRCR m PRY GROUND O R..FOM I CC I If� no. 3...11 C NTS WY COOK,ANY AMITY RM,M PROTECTED AREA 0 MT 130E RSfMAIED m MAMA NOCONC.._•V•N :.0 w.EOM.Rq1.MEANS. N I 1 INP 14..81 M.. neem Z ` 5 81110X6 YAM.WO SOT Dm59R,01600 00X4515.SHOUT DB MCAT.HM 1005 Q 1 SN,W FIOI.AAIYII.! PM..rw > 2KAEl 17-a0 MDT o AnARrxrs TO MIS WNW MOW.-S/0 Pmol 9001 AMMO PRY MUT ro ANY IRE[R9T.T.FOR PRENR,. ® [� 774.4.. uj a E PRIOR m PRY GROTTO ORMewa,M CdAAC,a • 122430 'm_ 1r.i51n 1.101,•• J mive N J MOAD H ;NI; EM00011 0 Q 1 MALL[456 aro MM.REAOY NSME ME PROTEc0 Rdd8 x81.M 8110 Eat NO COMPLETELY 0RA0Mm.M PROTECT.MEA O ALL PROTECTED TREES NOM: .IN z2D•STEEL V CNur[ e O c MAY _ NCR'o cu00 000 .14•1111. • W W O.OMs ,RHS AS MOM EXACT R FUME WOW 6 clArrnT MOWN M BM.4AAas OR N121p'RA TIM.a AO..TO TORS a I RR..a. CC cc O z 601 H KAKE.ro C010.MMETE m A.EDM a Al RASE STI IBI NMS a DM 0140413 a vara 4004,.040 M ROOT 2064 O A ME N.Rum 10 I PRF 9001 AS A MUM.O M w.TM MOM DEA WORM RP LIT. A••3aR.e N TTG-_ `,` ., MO.POSTS 1DBBBw t- - a 0. PROEM 0001511M 0DA¢Cw9D BY 1An E.M. 2 1300 00 CONSOMMON81 PROVED¢Twn. [TEM,PAWL MO Ma __Impuo ' 0 STALL 000300 EnnMA.OR 603x10 R AMM w ow POnRTUEEY OwMaG ACI.HS.0T M TREE PROTECT.IOL PROW...MNG ANO 0.09101 RENT MM.DOAM 104510 0 w[SNOT d M 2'SOME 9 CI.UCE Ewe nmr. _ LII ' LU OALWATED ME CEM M ,� II.Nm LL TNM a..1 R. Pn.m n M ED¢O M,w PROM101 ZONE.m CLEANLY SERER M NVR O , M PROL.O MAv4Mw FOR M SWL IS MEM m M OF PROMS DM MAL 10142• cm.. N1 'P..m 4 TREES TO DE RIO TO MOM RODE OwAR a nuvAaN a AIM 121 rE[T ORP MNa AND M IO P.0#RNc w M TM dwtt FAnln IwE H PROMO.M FWAL 5 801 H REWIRED TO NATE CORRECTIVE MAW PERFORMED O PRESERVE.1005 M CRIER TO 0100 04WO FRd 1100111.!OR SWAN.*10041 PRD NAY E WOWED woo MAR* is Pnlarrit TO WM.w MES M0101010 CONSTROCnd PFM.Or M..APR FIRM. MN PRO1EC110N 701E NO1F'S IOW Mem WeeMln AM 7 Mem. N7am SRP ENwM(MENT Nm M ROOT PROTECTION LOW MAY H ALLOIED RIM PROJECT WORST waw POSTS W51 H 6 SH.WW1.M MR PROTECT.MIME M MAR 9401.M PROECT AReweH APR an 0130351 AUMwas MR X10111 11 Aum m A 00011 OE J . sr APPROVAL AS COMBED N M F0001.NOTES N RSS MM 1n M sw.. xl MORE MAT PRY 1A04Aa.IG ORE N M CRH PNICTNN 01 m S B4OWNm M.001..001.¢M BARRY.SHALL .MM 1 A1CO HIED II WORMY CR MMA N ME EDP LW O M SOL N M N USE MO W CRITICS/OT IO[AREA WO.BEGIN TOM TOM HEIGHT OOSr W�Tw� WM TABOR AOW.081 MEANIE.M REMHOBFR MH m E PRESERED NO MEM SPRAT OABOM RN PEC ATRIOS WE MATO m M CA CLOSEST FE _ NOD ! M WADE 90.13 N1 H WETTED OR Am11®011N M IRR PROTECT.IO[.TIT011 M®ECT NreORKiS NIIWIIATXN M INOE[115080051 MAT.ANON COYAAR 2 M 001800 KN 91a[D H oat a HNO/141 040 OR AM A MM..TB A NPR TIM X155 0..086 ar DATE R/./2015, OF w 10 OE HALF a M NEA R M MCS ROOT 281E OM TENT Sas(N CLAY9OV0.0111146 W.OS.AID.4010.0[5.R I 1 m M on.RPM RE4.5SMr m rvmr OTT dMNG d LDo4APr MM5 f rtOEM RNR!d 45H PROI[CDT DFS/¢.Olr u NT MEWL M 9..702 O M TREE AERATIOR R.RS RAY H ROOM m mor M TREES SURVIVAL f ARE a NAM.M ROOTS r CR LAMP MORD er PROW ATM MARK.LLE. 2 B01.OMEs O PRMCRT NEA u H ESTMU9EO N .y/n N4.On. P4..4w I Q a f 00E NMA BMT.«(EMMET SMARM OM M ORFA4OR SHALL STMT M M FBD BY M 014501154 RNR m 10 45 STAKED O.N.J. „. es44 G PRYR01510 C 1150X1 m A PRESO MD TREE B RAISED MAN MAY IT COND SLOT.OR ERODE Mm M TREE MIME.20111.IL.Ill H PENDENTLY STOWED TO [ PIT ATM[WV.RT WE AM 90015 0Y TER-FOR RSR LER PRN WE RE 5 80000105«ROl[CMIu 01 90150 H STAKED NO 8j,14„` \ f( r A,a O M ROOTS IS REST...M Mw TIM M S OEE NDB OTS AMMO r T wo3T-.PRI MUNE M RAO310 DAM.YRE WBWIST RNR TO r00014095 .0.0 MOM �(c,��QJG ROOTS LMOF Mw 10ANEER AN 1110*9T0£ 0 101 H xsTAum NMT M WLR PROTIUM TOW O wr mH TO H PRESERVED 1000 M 4*08 15nd O M PROECL AM0M5T.M 4 A SEER MM¢NAR wWEAL i 1110919 POSTS Nlw.�r. WOIRD OWAO m INE SPEOFIC OYS 9MAR 4511CRT.MOOS AN/OR USE 0/caw LEWES m ENSUE M IRR'S 9.X74 NO TOM...a M MIMI.FOR RST 5. DEW!91000 H TNIANFD RP010011 CONSTRUCTION N CA Q To M IMAMS,0901 PRMTO4 UMW WOES MORE H LOCATED 811.0 M 110 3O1CTT 281E¢AHS N H PRESERVED M PROWL,00151 NAM MEI-, _.,( METAL TREE PROTECTION FENCE REM... - 10009E THAT ODOM Sr MRBm urR M 1415 O AHS TO H R455FMm f M PROEC1 MM.91410405 MAI Am01s MMD 900000111 REDUCE M 'MwinA.. awns O M 45Hs 000070 I,BRUCE R BAEORN.ATTEST V Ar TRS -1s l a ,.,1115,,, TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL DEAN11S8`.�- WI,Peer J DM[CndAM FIT.O MS..0 H USED m AAO Ow.R m PERS R9aA10 Fa PRESERVATION MEETS A40 of ,r REwIREY 11S IN i0.0.-. 31303• R M PRMCT ARBORIST WY MORE AOOnCRx WEE PREERVADT 200515 wa 01 COMMIT PRM BEE CARE 004111 s1DBMDs. MARC1D, PART, a THE CITY a -�___� SEE SUPPLEMENTAL hRRORIST °jepvo 15'0Coe NUMBER94 ncARB URBAN FORESTRY YANUAI. Q4H REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION I, O.1..D. 1 4294 BTM 015011.O/06450.104 N1 TREES SHOULD 00 4145 H REEEH.m EVALUATE 000 101000.WO aim.AN0 REM.0 ADJACENT TREES CM ER1fiE1 --- SHEET ARMI5Lv.SEEN CEPECR NO OMH4 A (EMMY MES CAN H I MAR.0.116 C06TINCA. 4&•-----/ somo Orman PM . Pommy Y SRAM SHAW E AMMO(OR MT 10 RIR1 AS I.RCMI O M 101 A USER Om.10 M ROOT 00 Of AN4 HRAs YO E HAMMIN D WIC 9181 PARCEL NHUCE 815(80X,SER IBRD AB817N ST BRUCE R..Bw*0101* /Rpq m no5 TREE PRESERVARON VAL RAN BY BRUCE R.B UNK CEA1MED m4411M r E MRO.PMOBS TRIM NEM PROPERTY 1.11.3 91/E1 x50 H.IOM IRI IFN R PUCE)AS XFRSMT150 AS MIA CAM 01101516 A 10ARR11T PARCELS. PN-55050 ,..Jia 33.1, AMORIST FII-66664,MM MS ENCBEE(61N0 d FORESTRY a.MB.w.1. -N m• CITY OF TIGARD Approved ',- y Planning Date: /`,//t4 . ! UI Initials: LS gilli LEGEND o-. �I W s 1 1 s ,i TAX LOT 9100 4 � USW aMeu MOM nm --- - 2 1e j \' '� .v Yu 1S1 su. I TAX LOT 2200 caw aaYo mom a E0 --"`-- \ a 1� LOT n F TAX LOT 18400 :I p l " LO1166 T u _ I Ise : roseaN>E000,0 c - 8., w 1 TAX LOT 9200 w I TAX LOT 2300 Z, slxu aYEOIii °D 0.. TAX LOT 9900 �i LAI YAP 0s " 14,11 NM DJ p TAX LOT 8500., �,III W ¢ x,MJS r so rear I-+ / 'A`YAP 15 '°'" , i Z O r, ,.1. A o TAX LOT 9300 sm nYr TAX LOT 2400 f/) N TAX LOT 10200 I I � 1 ""Yu03 11 mYw 1/10.15,;1 2510 W — # ""iYKr a WA I-,t, I' I TAX LOT 8800 W w,1s co,Yw,o,swo TAX LOT 8600 tI LU m I "'W 1, � to,10 LAX YAW;sl seu O i LU are E. I W cc N �'W °' § I TAX LOT 8700 I ( } TU Mw IS 1 WA TAX LOT 2500 N TAX LOT 9600 5 TAX LOT 9500 I 4 TAX LOT 9400 ar' Il r .,,rs1a4o IY YM IS I,WY '''''''.7,.'''" I -" TOT Ie :1 T".Y oris i xu i�\ S E - I I i ro,ie Q ����i��l��E� 8� Y Z CC Q ��� " l� II� TRAC h� „ ,, ik. � , , _, 0, i IIIrI`I ., , ,Ille 1.1.1 I 7 TAX LOT 2600 f I ' �� !� a(c-:--_ -s-)' Z TAX LOT 302 TAX LOT 300 I � 'i '1011`, - ,, • 1 m„ Cl- LAX LW 15 1 MA51f13 I 1f- �f �I�`�i 1 II �" i'L-7--� TAX LOT- - 1i-�-i (.,�` `.; — 1*--r--11. 7 ���11111111 —�� 5t •OVIAIF A her) ra 70015 1 0 9I } "a u��••sona��urYp�wed• ♦ J C) Ir a. ZA ' E an OO -- z —�— H� TAX LOTS 30TAX YAP 153 6" I TAX LOT 2800CC TY"WT119 LEOdn. 'I ate. 6 APPROVED" - 5116 OAK STREET ESTATES' N _ .l R SUBDIVISION(SUB 2014-001) .0',�•+ _ "" ' 111adore 0 0 m As Mow 1 030 9/030015 ¢ I TAX LOT 2900 R; 1 TAX am .,? I v 1 1 41 i:ldl li i.i. .,Li nI":' � �oCa TAX LOT 3000 ," 15110 .000 NUMBER LA./96 ts 1 11 4294 SHEET P06 CITY OF TIGARD Approved 4-Y/ Planning Date: - / sg hd 'II InitiIs: z„....S IC _i — CO..SOM.,10 IDA PANPS.SRUCID BY DEVELOPER 11 - 0 ¢�of — CO.Ell SM.CONSRUCIED BY WYEDURZEP \-_—+;--"'' ��' l__ c — ABP AC VA..1.ML BPR 56011061B a��� W� _,7'4 ,4 9C�NSI R — I 1 Z.e. � O N i� N cog w. CO 1 W �A ' .J ,g I AO N -- BaINOSW > r v a Im roni nrtx �. ( ■y■\� TRACT B LU m Pww Buo Pa) N ' - 12 li 1 1... CV YZ Y 9 Aa 0 Cr DAMN. 1 II 4 C3: IOt.16 010 MOW.. SAI„ TAPER(.PaE) (T"1 1 'ki I ii; MM.(RB) Z: — n�o�mswwrspt I �www 3aD -�.� illi, ----------------------- -------------- �_ SW 69Th AVENUE '" Po\ W LLI I_ APPROVED"OAK STREET ESTATES" "\ \ C/) SUBDIVISION(SUB 2014-001) W I } re CE 811 I Q °I0+ I --I— UJ w F DMly 1,y CC 3S R/1/ I BI 50. PI a I m' BEm`B Iz r I z5' I rs i B n c R I I we PETE I ru.E I ,A9°�3 I, -' I 05.111.20 —IRP) I I _.'�–P511Pxx) 0E00 1 I, I mOBz) I , AS ..I B' S 5' S' 1 11 5' S' ' BICC AR 9/83/]015 �� _D3 8.5'� I r0.3' 2' 0 C I v. }Awr slzur i T' z=1 i ` xl v*. 2- I .. 'ei s _ 21 WB xl D$ _ _ - _ s1lw >'.66.1.4 I S �o a:\ swoxm OM 4AO*0 ti�+� I-- �< ,--.,21,v;',.7, ''•,'P�vo dry -.,TAT I SAW+ I 3'(9022 l.zluMAC Brn A aRRP(IWI " SWORD OMB OihN MC I.8E 5/4.-0 CI..R.n1ER. arms 15'A'BET 05Q, 6MR 6R 1-1/Y-B CP.E0 FOCI BAS COMSE 0. TYPICAL HALF STREET SECTION TYPICAL STREET SECTION U aPA e :'OF B/.-B CROWS Pocx BSEP. a SW 69TH AVENUE ,,Of 1-1/r-B CRUZ.BRP omi. SW LOCUST STREET z5a i%.'o m slm R.OVER, COMPACTED SEdPwE TYPICAL 8'TURNAROUND SECTION LOCAL STREET LOCAL STREET cavuTED SUBBa°DE°PacB BSER. STA 0+1050-STA o.z.00 JOB NUMBER94 STA a.OBUB-STA TT.on STA - B.B.w NOT TO SCALE 4294 Y el R SAE NOT TO SCRE MET P07 ,., ig g g M g g g g g I MO g g I g g g g .;tire vz (\ u x1. I $'R: 33391 / F, _1 1 8ff/ 0 w 16N 1 s 1716wR1w ,rs .... .6"59 ¢A a1n' • A.1 1 a >se: R 7-1 y 3070 11 127.1 07.9 g 0 3 32111 I;Q� » 1 r�v .1 11 m 32!11 p9 EMS 22.94 22 ]997 I A' c r .0. MIK 043010 Al MI1Eae4 _ n z I �5 m 110.45 roma CRAM AT IMMUNE .^5 j SAARe19 33 3 33 Wul F,r'1A sr q 'rpox n9.M EL 310 BillaP gun 11nnSn 2s rt, 1••. m' > 31765 Ens]M6 MC.37 32124314 A •: 7 7 111 b RIMED GRADE Al M.ERl14 1 v o6 .. 363 1 6= 171 2 3 11415 51A.21.97 DO SW 6972 ATONE •SiA 10200 W SW LON515R30 :3 11191 �Efi W:y EL 515.99 1YBm-p 1314 A 11.6 114 1 1 4, 4 E; 1 64 66 . 14 1 11x'6 yy 1116 1. W1 977 - �. MCE �3 lam MM.411130 u5 22 END 51REEi ..IS F..P 3126 0513 :g 11x.A1 ¢.UIKS... . . 9 31243 S =v s-E eulxsr9w s SW IX115r S1Ra, 15 1 ¢2116W 369329432.E 1 9x! 31/46 1 1 11 I I I 8 a g s g g lS b IiII51295 31179 I I s334 5 "ExM V g a g 5 g g g ® 72 0207.4372X9 I / I I STA 0 GED PAM EL 11501 CR r,� �� _ 'r.1732171132 SP � :® e*Ao•s A ¢!17 12132300 x.06 PM YAM GR 5 61 RFO YAM ¢12100 m� 01 = 36 2011 Ii1:Ir:'', 1:1 E#MC 80010 Ar c(lyvVh31M{ F,n 1769 3195132 aAM Al 2912!3232 y rimo 1162 .2.1 S .. ...YAM rI 2 314a CR v IN 76 o 4 _ OBI 11559 ®AA1706 ¢11204 fEp PAMC 11 'i i` .3 R 9;` Ar%EM fNDfOKsmr u._--- -13 OD , a* > S PRELIMINARY STREET OAK STREET ESTATES 16 NbMtl 92032 5 �_�`v`^ PROFILES NO. 2 SUBDIVISION 563 6152 -°M.,. It TIGARD OREGON El4ENEEAMO suR9E9N0 MEUML RESOURCES 4. g S V L 30333,33M:u03,2 � 'mum,-PLAM1113 LANDSCAPE AR01(fECNRE CITY OF TIGARD Approved by planningg. Date: �l�I//(P ig Initials: 0 / 0� / il TAX 16RCOs 8300 sP 1 1 1 1 W / zs_e V TAX LOT 9100 Z" I 1 1 ' ,,,.,,,,,,,�,,, 3 , TAX LOT 2200 0, orn J d r TAX16LLvOT 8400 Ie LOT 13__ CO C7 III 1 1 \ wri I I w �a Tp1 / ( , ni--'' ' Q Z t T1 I r I 11 TAX OT 2300 -n S 1, TAX LOT 9200 1 I1161.0M, 1 1 1 ru�,s r 16/ ' I I wr r. N I I I LOT ll I I w > 11 11 TAX LOT 8500 j p 11 I el. • T/OXLOT:r xu , I W CO f 1 I W TAX LOT 9700 I I I I \ CC Cr) I TAX LOT 9300 1 E 1 TAX LOT 2400 CV TOWL.19 0w TAX LOT 10200 I T/0/rss 16uI 1 1 PAW¢I MP a..e — ^i i 1 TAX LOT 8800 I�u urs (n 0 TAX LOT 8600 L 0001 TO 0151016 am' q, i " LOT m 16/ T/110 IS 1166. i o I WT.IMP Y z WI —I , It I < CC Ap I TAX LOT 8700 a TAX LOT 9600 I TAX Y/151]iu I 11 TAX LOT 2500 C7 WWI,'.6 TAX LOT 9500 p� TAX LOT 9400 ? '°r' i � 1 TAI iLOT A,rm - P; ne ,/ rm o 16/ II 11 I TAX Y LO15 6 16.. I 1 1 _ Iii __' i1 W 0 TO MING 0 zwa. l+r*I-`��j II i-. I.nw r.0 `uv.0"i .smarm.m.ur, TRACTS y ' - -- - O I #m0 0110L[IT10 ® 7 I i d 5700 urmr mr)� I_'[ I I!! , - ,. 1 /J TAX LOT 2600 O N a r ,• -T• 4�—«wcc,,o rmnw uwv is mo 0 W TAX LOT 302 TAX LOT 300 r I / �^ MAW STOW LAMM ITT0 I 510011 01 MN LOT n TAX 101151160 TIM 011115 116A. sr,/r umr� I I I ^- wAI SEM III ���w , 0n[csO.Hrta m MD ortw I s.16r/r srrR.rxi0[ } h° 6 1 CC J_ MYuIE WIrNY�/ - Oma' — Q r 2 3 II nr Ir/) / � N.--caccr m cmr0c Z -- I STORM.MI Sun/,WIWI ITwf i I1 t 4 —EL/ , TAX LOT W qq moa,ria 51;04111 FTR,FmN c . 'I 1 5 TRACT A r 2700 --�'— �_ �` —_ 1A A .� \*- 1 I1 �•,� f �. /runr�r i , LOT 11�� a _- � l. L _ er 711 • _......,...._ I -I- __ 1 - __`L f 1 —�`.d \ \ Io,,_ I I gym.. u0 TAX LOT d". 303 COMET TO NSW C.IIFrY.x 0 7010 \\ 1 , � 1 I TAX LOT 2800 DA eNalmis �� ST.xr0af jf� r/min 1 I moo TAX MO 15i MY M lig 4��;;^J1A2 APPROVED"OAK STREET ESTATES" I � 1 _ ,,-o SUBDIVISION(SUB 2014-001) ''Ill F I II I J W ) I I TAX LOT 2900 , ',a: I s , TAX 16w rs l mo mm m .,. -1 42Hu9�e40 SHEET P09 12 L01' TAX LOT 8500 1mss 55{6 TAX LOT 9700 TAX LOT 9300 TAN MP IS 1 S TAX LOT 2400 LOT IL TAX LOT 10200 SEM BAP IS 15 WA • SEM MP,512501 g5. N 1Y MP rs 1 SAL • TAX LOT 8800 LL L0i 13 e EAcrB MWPSESIMM TAX LOT 8600 ' ' .2 TT g i ? 10310 SEM WV01se 1101 0 !_n 2 ui 91 TAX LOT 8700 °x' O'70� 0. 4 g TAA SEPT9 1DSR TAX LOT 2500 _5.A,.< TAX LOT 9600 3 rn TAX LOT 9400 °i 9 C IA.wP IS 12. TAB 1 or I,1.123X.1,70:196"0 N DOM Z w wwisI Au O� LOT gs --J 1?:m ' QtOw y1, 15.11 1.161 CC i \ s`..'f � �j'°u's I 2 ; .�.� �; Ilk wvvvvvvvvvvti Z O 10206/-"*"'"GAaMRE(TI') 1�06r 'III Z\ I 110¢1 1021 PRM�ME GMwEE IrP1 EO-iEaxlca 4PaRRBi 1 1�w I• . w F - %-'1 Q Q I 5&7' 1 'S I I CI I j 1 7 �'� ��rti� �,\ \\\\�\\ -00.x0 U) !n s 6. 4 1 1 � 1 J 1 2122114 -".:\ '4. SEI \ W >_ s. CLOSED SOL SLLWL JME•3J OP 114(2. L L \- g� - TAX LOT 2600 Q TAX LOT 302 TAX LOT 300 1005! 6 AI 1DM COKER T1s 1 m W TAX WAR 151]633 rAx 1.¢11605 ,- r m I*`� I �' 501 MR Ire/ Y - I m 03050!1'031• W 10041,1 �t ) ! 4, I :10.�o ss 1022,'14"."*.' -_ � I �./ , I 1 OREGON MOF ON(TP) \ 0 . O 2 a 0.091 4 96.1�2M3 4 S.,�4 `�•1008 i L �' _ • /Vf/1 soaa 1uo�o 'op 3� r �,�' � , a� � o Z �� 1 444 1 i-,`�` +� �� TAX LOT -Iw Q p 1000 1001 1 • 1 ' <'" 5 - ti lcc ` AS Orn) 1002 ��� ���� -TW4==fOfO` n. 4 ��ic` a.2Po 00 -1 3 E 0 Q, SW NTH AVENUE + TS 1 MO la X --- 1 w rl/ -.-. raw , ` 6 r H 0• �_ "' I A�`„�i `1, o115es SOV e1159"/ \ „7 ,I Imo' \` DE N EDM W Da TO ER . TAX LOT TAX LOTM2800 Z 303 APPROVED"OAK STREET ESTATES" IMO W F a 1.Y WP,5111M SUBDIVISION(SUB 2014• -001) \ 1 TRACT' 1 M �„9 J • • 1f I � (n5. >- > LEGEND SCA.1--90 Tar nffinepacegagf S5OENc rg5(ANOP9 Q ® mm 1 Yltp 3o3M 0*xpUM001[011W AVGNFF WIIMLGNOPRIPN01 tlP010NR6.IF[30025 R� MAlsONATa11Ntt 0110917341 W3003051111[CANPO Z Z UAW RAywooc.Asm EWER 90 Cr 100/Ar Sr wfxl®3r 00505/1.961. Q 00Au is RANIEDVATREWOW 0aER • R A M N - READ/707 sr OV 11..9 0555.3 s< 1.963 9 V .OM1 RA.MwuASH OVER SEDGE 97 SPREAD/. =SF 10970 MM.REDEEM NV .. , Lar ax.n..vERA� 1033 00 arn00D.0 51 w53�ma D/1mu 006 0305 EAD/1wss J 707 5. S.N. a.MR.,MDBMRawx.EdOP9cohn O!S^!• .. ,:L. -. - ..1,0219 I. _11005 5000000350 OVER 97 w..707 si w5.;®3 E of 50 Mw Iii W •1' LIJ ©�� Rus 303'000000 500IMCUOrwa0.OUSAAsa4 0350313 01. 7073 5ID1A. 00116,3 TIR 00551°°5. W15P500D/107 0�� 01MSP0M SWR 5Mc0..M65S C0005W 50x0 03.10010/MR NI. 0.11DD5E 3130//01. a ��!�!•���.!�!t!;�,!!' 11ePmoR es A1n"`" © 000.0000010 wMSmnpx0015muMEcr:-LosE_ 51 rxAwurss RDss ;00506 02571003. Au5/,m. ,11131 9214 1010 707 9 E i:R.�: IRD911ATELL soL Iw1E NES B _ _ - I.Sn 2 9/2314 RAMOOOC S M. ---- .x SSss NSF OVER 1005. 311,010,. 7010 DD, w W1751 1 9 10310 wEsTERN RED.. .NETEATOM5® T 12'."172Lau 5.5x13/25. MO PRARIRO[ PE OVER SSOOOCT I5M T4E1 20SMGD/3U. 5.9300. 3•140//L.5 0 631[ M /1740 =1_PMR101.0 CRABAPPLE 111 p "ENL EAD/1,961 s1 1,9655E 1°0001511ET. s1xu011v. lx. OVEN.. EAO/L9613. L.S. - - - PLMTEOMFwYECxv001DM ���� 10.29/3796 ]Oil ON1,WNSR9m[0AR w555WcfIMFTMEI 9}SPRLA011915. 2.5.1.11.25 0002 an _ OER1,01053 055/155155f 4515. PAM 1,45e _ ___ u) a,M2 u/3270 PIM1®SMPMA9YN101AL 76FMH C,VE1130W. 25 SPREAD/551ST 591-9 D4w01RHMMEdM7 Miff 7075 COP SOL 1V WE5 POSSE 9x MRN M 0.211-6-x.17 0.01106 SWOP.FIRE 3007 52 MAW 11111141 M R411I-01-013 001,5 KIM M 10116 W.A.NANA OVER Sam. S051(50/396353 4965. 09.03 GENERAL NOTES. 11104.111 SOO a REAMED PG TREE S 103E BY S DEEP ILO.505 PARAS'ARE USED TO WET MSE STAWAM0 80355 3 LP 4P MEAS E AVAILABLE 00 3mD. SP1uwUW. 01.707 SF BA-.M_ NL 10307 0100 ft05015 ro 103100 D M 5.T O TGND 8901 51,60005.RMI N 50100000 MM 'Olb SIL MSE CLOSED SOL PARIS MU N 0 5050 d M ME MIR ND ME 0MCA.51050 d M PLM I7 7 050 10 SEC1RN 12-STET M£ OVER 1,LOCOS; 9111.40/7117 SF 101M1MDEMOmMF MG 1LFIY.M I ML VOL.SINDM05 ASO PP00014 DUAL A1D PARKE COAD 50.VELURE SRCPIGMNs M M INBM 301055.7 WA. 10161 1®. SSPREAD/017 50 of *5 0NPM MN.6x0EM64 A Y. S0MDMOS AWED 11 M OREG.UM.Cd03Cr65 BO.OLP) ALL SWEET MRS 910.X550`21 %WMTO9 10 Law A,B'103 MOI BMW MTR.AA..m 0310 M CURB MD M WEIDIRS >w EO PLANT SCHEDULE 10520 wESTERN R OVER 1,®ss c0D 2563 �. /01/2015 As NDnD 11.1111105.0. w BMW.d ME 1KIR 3301 S.*3 All S4RT MES 51605 91.BE PARALLEL 0 MIT RDI,0 7005050 SPN 3914 OT 30 EM S}RT IEE STMT. 10521 RLC,AIDER 0051®. '37610/0150 03150 ' 1.11111.1411.11110 11M116ML1m/LOWAIF MME 2 MOR N MN NSINS011 AS NLUEDPLAN.PLAN WY LIF OWILED DUE TO AWRABLIT,COSI.5.11 MOP OT SI540000 'ETC By NE LxOWPE r609Ett NZ qp M1tlEKtlyE ,BL1t y3(f9WtlL 1057 25.05177 OER3WD. '011050(05. tlt. NZ M WE 0011.6.401M411BA4 WT. 1. REG 3150 TO 9MIOp10MOTET*101 �� \ N30MI0 xMEaA1NGs 7145.141E id RM'1030 RES MING LOTSm. 156.ELIAT WARP 0.11 MVR 00611.900 9 SeYYAO/1,961. L961. P o� \ 7010 SE CUP 9051170 GENRM RAN LEGDD / S SOILS. REM 10 91*12 MO MPOLI ES a 10005 UMN11a6nr OWJ4 700331,STORK,00 O 2 MOUS.NM. PRMGM RM MR[1 1/3 CAL BOBBLB 111101 maw W. OVER LIDO. 03 0/L9W u 1915. ��.....,%4.,. MOOD SOLS FOR PLANTER NEAR MEWED SOL PUM05NT MD CPPAm10.CUERG 50.3310007.70.7300 31161 MEAT 590118 LORA S1000000//i 561. 6961ST QP �Q S0.1011G PROLDIMS.MD COPD 91 PLO.EXT 9101 CAE.TO 0T a TURD STA ONR15 WMM MO a CLOSED 96 A4A5 To 3 MT 1161 x62 DC[DM P10ID. 03013[0010151 0150 GL° M 6 MM.OM MES M PLMO MASE ME 5.0-910 A.bl MIMED N M 505 CM.C.ULAMAIS NO I MRCVS GAWRMA OECd 0110 00 11/2'CM.BOB 13i WESTERNS 25, nig TEP C00 0 MEA 6 MI 99001 d 2505 0.M. 11235 REO 3 vu 1000. .7530101. I.BRUCE R BALUNM,517057 1081 1105 �SIX PLACER SIPS 9AML RASE 0440510155 1001100.7 0455 OMR14 APm001 BE L705GM0 ILRM ISREEON ASN vER 1®. 1011.1.0/707TSS05 0A. ' PRESERVATION N IMO EST D L PUN ,L-.,J ' 7 A OE10G0111'M1110Drs SRMT moo 6D 4110110 0 BE KAIF➢MO WNW.BY 4MMDDN Lar OOPS TREEE75 ALL DE Of D KNOW/ ENr5 N • =ELMS •0303&J0* 911IXLE1[ 0*/0014A 0 tl�N LAYRl.W.MR MF *SK .RE0Mf0 53*1 MES 19 low �, SECTION IO. PART I. a NE an a Ij� 4294 0161370 URBAN FORESTRY NANU4 Y }� 11 DUD1rs 700343 Romeo' 4000 3 3g.../64-------‘ BRUCE:R.BALDRIN imam 391 2'fI1 BOB P7O i T MT:1/510011120010075500750175M 911. M MOBOw V lei Cr VEE EM L MES RL g PNN-66660 000.5 a iwv� E PM 0 WIT M SES MEET 0E REO RERENI FOR M 911 LI 12 LEGEND \\ b FOOT BOM.Mow � if <. . I I ----- [CUM STRUT I der 2 DISTING MOW.CMM[PM - Is ImBsnnNr mMcnM j / / I '"^�xs£ fed s K SIAM TT (10133,3=3 C10' ,3=3N-SR NITS 1t 21 ) j / I I \ N. O,� / (An PM 7 g / W Qa NOTTS I I / \ Z O w 1 Ns oM®u/l NNE SNIT CINFON11'KAN NIS BM BRNNF➢ SO T TIE SOWOF AM I S&FI 'NNRRIIS M PE WV v P..QC1R1 i \ a o 2 MOMPIU2l NNE SNRTSARTfMECM1Y PUlf_IS WRIN,BPSE �_-•-•-_-_-_-.-_-.-_� WPM 014.1 FOR PE LPO USC AMMO.NIE LW 0.u[na / --- -._-~_—.— / N N EEi ��NEmM1N�BUS MRS R.LL PUR M PMP PN91 I / I I• \ W > M im M 11E USW 9a. Ci L11 03 �O _ I - �1 i � \ cn v�I N .0.,--.0 FM I U'tj ......... '�_ - �n O j1 - Z ;I I I �,CO IAACT B j • i a CI • SW 69TH AVENUE ' 6 iL CC �I �_ SW69TNAVENUE_1 J ' 5 ITRACTAI� I Q CC _ m > _ OI WI - _ 1 I JI- yI II 1 SW 67TH AWAM —.__i__. \:_::==-_--->--________� I— / V U �.`•—•------- SV(67TNAVENUE \ Z 1 - -- --— - J ¢I / w I \ I� / \. � w 1 W.g \ 1— I \ >I / AS L- .— L '1 Kyr Salm I N --- ora 9/03/20,3 •\ _ _SW66THAVENUE � i 1 I ?P' SW 66TH AVENUE �-� — ----- - I J�' 1 i J43 NUMBER 4294 SHEET P11 // /� / \ \ \ // / ,- ------ I - - - - - - - �\ \\- - _ - - - _� — . , ‘ \ \ fg \ � I �\ '-'---, v.',N \-,..\ `� � ------N''--- ‘ yo ° = • v / � I SCALE 1" 20 FEET ��v A \`. �� zso 1 �\ A� �� � A\�y��� �-�,5�� �� N VAA'\ TRAOT B - )- ,.d n A • N. V�� ��� �,AAA� N.A )1/ �-, ✓' i/ /,,,,\ ----,-,,..,-, j 20 0 8 12 16 20 \ ., ��Z ��l ����J i�, Av �_, 1 A 7 \ \ s \ �� �����J -� - SANITARY SEWER MAIN (TYP) \VAV A \ \ \� � *w \ \ �� A �\ 1 \ I LIDA PLANTER BOX (TYP) 1 \\\ \\\ \ 'N \ \, \ \ \ \ �\ \ \ N \ \ \ ` 1 1 ' 1 ' n i 1 1 \ . v , v , y v \ \ � v v v V '. i i 1 i ( 1 I I ( UTILITY TRENCH A (LOT 7) A \ 1 I I ', ' / 1 I I I I � l I I I ' I I I V \\ 1\ I j ` �\ �\ `� \v �\ , / / /I / 1 1 1 SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT (TYP) // 1 i e--I LEGEND .. .. \.. � � I i I — SLOPES GREATER 7HAN 25% SANITARY LATERAL (TYP) ���� \\�\\C\\\\\\\‘`\\�►\O` \\\\\\moo\\ t\`\\\\�\ \��\`\\\\\\\\O\ \ /I I / ... s. 1�° / unuTr TRENCH LacATm IN 71 \ � .. II— '"I / \\\V — ARiEASN 25% SLOPES GREAm+ ` \`\ • m `1 C.7'�:\\\\\`".�`�\ .N`C,\���``\�.\\�\\` ,A-'Nx mom--'" I / Zr '\� I 1 J l / / V�'\ � / � A I L,,(' r�� ,-/////i//;' ; UTILITY TRENCH B (LOT 6) / �"�/� 1I v� I 1 / l )l / A , / / //��/ / v 1 — l l l / //� //7—''; j ( ----/j / 'N II H- - - - V l/ // // //�_/ i ---/-"::-__----_-� — / I I (STORM SEWER MAIN (TYP) V � ! �� � I //// i 6 v /17/111/ 1 / 1/ I// // �///l// i �/ _--- - ---__— I I / / /� � 111 I � '. _ N I W ,. l ( // / / / 2 III( I \ \ , . / 3 �_ SLOPES > 25% 0 , ' I 1 // 1 - / I / I 1 \ ( /�/%VA V I / ��- \ N �� I V I I I \ (\\\ \\V I �, j�� _ _ A I II _ NUMBER AREA ACRES COLOR 1VA ( I I I 1 1 V �� I I 1 A Na, / ///�-- AA A� I Q 1 ±15.445 10.35 1 1 I 1 � v i /// I I \ v\ V\ Al \ ' ' IIID II \ \ // — \ I ! 1 v �1 1 111 I \ \ \ I \ I I " 1 I 1 I 1 1\I\v A \ vii—_ //� ,%—_�'��� �\ \ I I 11111 \ \ \I1 � , IiI II II\ I ��I1���� �/ — � � / / � i-� �, i � \ I I I I � I � � � I a \ \V A 1 1 � A \1 11 I I� I�' 1 ( II '�/'� I I� ' I %moi 11 _7:,\----‘:\--:\\\\\\\\ I ! ) I \ 111 I I \ UTILITY TRENCH C LOT 5 - 1 \ \\ I V ( )_=- � :::j� �V A \ \ tii 255 —� r / CITY OF TIGARD // I- - - - - ----- --- -- --- \ Iv-- v v �' 1y l IApProvecbyPla Hing v _ vvvv �v vI v� I ; Date: ��° /(P _TR�c�Av v vv \I v\11 Initials: L-- \ \\ \\ \\\\ \\\`` I �� I I i /j STORM LATERAL (TYP) N �- ��, �� �� v `6s \VA `1 I 1 1 V / s N 11\ , I/ N \ �� ) v� 11A 11 1 I N \ I \ ; \ \ \ i 111 \ I ! I \ \ \ \ 1 \ I ; I EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 25% DATE: 12/17/2015 UTILITY TRENCH A (LOT 7) TOTAL VOLUME OF EARTHWORK DISTURBED WITHIN THE SLOPES GREATER THAN 25%: ±13.5 CU. YD. SLOPES EARTHWORK EXHIBIT UTILITY TRENCH B (LOT 6) TOTAL VOLUME OF EARTHWORK DISTURBED WITHIN THE SLOPES GREATER THAN 25%: ±14.0 CU. YD. UTILITY TRENCH C (LOT 5) TOTAL VOLUME OF EARTHWORK DISTURBED WITHIN THE SLOPES GREATER THAN 25%: ±21.0 CU. YD. OAK STREET ESTATES NO. 2 PG: 1 OF 3 ØOTAL AMOUNT OF EARTHWORK DISTURBED WITHIN THE SLOPES GREATER THAN 25%: ±48.5 CU. YD. DRAWN BY:SRP CHECKED BY:AHH DWG:EARTHWORK EXHIBIT JOB: 4294 NOTE AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC 12965 SW HERMAN ROAD, SUITE 100 FOR DETAILED CALCULATIONS AND TRENCH PROFILES, SEE SHEET 2 AND 3. TUALATIN, OR 97062 PHONE: 503.563.6151 FAX: 503.563.6152 AMMISC 310-- - - - -_ -310 0 - ._ AREAS GREATER THAN 25%SLOPE AREAS GREATER THANL25%SLOPE IN _ - +. UTILITY TRENCH LOCATED IN I 300- SLOPE t _ --- -300 I 1 I I 290— ••. - _ _---'----._._..t-._.. _- - - -- ---.-4 _ —290 •�•'!"!.+1....... _.. 280— - "• • _ _-.—.—__.: { - -�d0 •;•�.� - VOLUME 1C=111.89 CU.YD. - - - - -l-____.-__._. �'i___ I I Jp•O.: I1 I 270_ .❖o. _- - -270 .••a•Q..•,•• - _ VOLUME2C=39.07CU.YD. ..ma--.....+3.9:...-.-.4.4.1.•:•...-.,....... -.!p•� 260— �. TRENCH BOTTOM , - ��•��� - _ '�_ I -.. __ -260 - , EXISTING GROUND I ---- •!- I ••.•••Oma•Osis �•::`Oi4:i': .•. _ 250— _mo_ - .•• .s.A.o.•O.• ....... •.....ya..s.:. -250 —. .—.. _. - --- - -- i �� VOLUME 1C: 311.89 CU.YD. 240 -.. .�-- - I VOLUME 2C: 39.07 CU.YD. -_+ _-_-. --__ 4- _.--•. -.,. _240 TOTAL VOLUME: ±21.0 CU.YD. - 230 --.__-�__.. _ _�. __ 1 _.._ �._. ___- UTILITY TRENCH C (LOT 5) 0 —___. ---W ------- -----_-....._ -- 230 __-_. --- -------- 1 VERT: 1'=20 al FI _. - ALL PROFILE ELEVATIONS ARE RASED ON .-- t _ CENTERLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED • 220ci N N H In In In Li, N w to clo .V H N N 220 r N 0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 0+90 1+00 1+10 1+20 1+30 1+40 1+50 1+60 1+70 1+80 1+90 DATE:11 1 //2015 SLOPES EARTHWORK EXHIBIT • OAK STREET ESTATES NO. 2 PG: 3 OF 3 DRAWN Br:SRP CHECKED BY:AHH DwG:EARTHWORK EXHIBIT JOB: 4294 AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC 12965 SW HERMAN ROAD, SUITE 100 AS( TUALATIN, OR 97062 PHONE: 503.563.6151 FAX: 503.563.6152 300- - -- -300 UTILITY TRENCH LOCATED IN UTILITY TRENCH LOCATED IN _ _ AREAS GREATER THAN 25%SLOPE AREAS GREATER THAN 250 SLOPE , 290-- _ _ - -- - -296 • -- �v,::.;•. VOLUME 1A=46.89 W.YD. 111.-11t111 - •'*.s _ 270 - __.. -- I.%.!:;.�., `W0i --EXISTING GROUND _.... - -'270 s —_ --- _ ____ _. 6v _ VOLUME 2A-46.65 CU.YD. _ - • TRENCH BOTTOM '1""4;2;;$•.O • •.:664yii C1eanWater\ Services (liar (A.m.tment n clear. CWS File Number 15-000983 • Service Provider Letter _ 15-000983 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R&O 07-20). Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Review Type: No Sensitive Area Site Address 6909 SW Oak ST SPL Issue Date: May 07, 2015 / Location: Tigard, OR 97223 SPL Expiration Date: May 06, 2017 Applicant Information: Owner Information: Name Name Company AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC Company AKS ENGINEERING& FORESTRY, LLC 12965 SW HERMAN RD 12965 SW HERMAN RD Address TUALATIN OR 97062 Address TUALATIN OR 97062 SUITE 100 SUITE 100 Phone/Fax (503) 563-6151 Phone/Fax (503) 563-6151 E-mail: alex@aks-eng.com E-mail: alex@aks-eng.com Tax lot ID Development Activity 1S136AA00400 Oak Street Estates Pre-Development Site Conditions: Post Development Site Conditions: Sensitive Area Present: On-Site X Off-Site Sensitive Area Present: On-Site X Off-Site Vegetated Corridor Width: 0 Vegetated Corridor Width: 0 Vegetated Corridor Condition: Enhancement of Remaining Vegetated Corridor Required: Square Footage to be enhanced: 0 Encroachments into Pre-Development Vegetated Corridor: Type and location of Encroachment: Square Footage: No on-site Vegetated Corridor 0 Mitigation Requirements: Type/Location Sq. Ft./Ratio/Cost None 0 X Conditions Attached X Development Figures Attached (2) Planting Plan Attached Geotech Report Required This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality •sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. Page 1 of 4 CWS File Number 15-000983 In order to comply with Clean Water Services water quality protection • requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: 1. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area or Vegetated Corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed in R&O 07-20, Chapter 3. 2. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the Vegetated Corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the Vegetated Corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by R&O 07-20, Section 3.06.1 and per approved plans. 3. If there is any activity within a sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide Clean Water Services or its designee (appropriate city)with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. 4. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon. 5. Prior to ground disturbance, an erosion control permit is required. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's)for Erosion Control, in accordance with Clean Water Services' Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual, shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 6. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from Clean Water Services or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. • 7. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 5.10. 8. Removal of native, woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable. 9. If applicable, the water quality facility shall be planted with Clean Water Services approved native species, and designed to blend into the natural surroundings. 10. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by Clean Water Services, the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-approved site plan is attached. Please call (503) 681-3653 with any questions. Amber Wierck Environmental Plan Review Attachments (2) • Page 2 of 4 \( C1eanWater Services Our commitment is clear. CWS File Number 15-000983 I r / _ / / N01ES: - _ RILL 300.13 ��` - / / I URINES%OWI IRF RAND ON U7DFRGRONO MET LOCATE EX SAN MH _________________________ / MAPPINGS AS PRONGED OT CIDERS.FRONDED FER UIIUIY IE 9t 29331 Ces) SW 70TH PLACE ... _ _ _- - / LOCATE,KTQT NU1�N,50302,0.IHE SUR3EY0R NARES HO _ / L2 7UTANEE Dur ME u10EMtl1[K No IOCArzs RffR@Nr TME __L S 29O 0 / ONEY UTU'IE1)N THE AREA L0171RACTORS ARE RESPON56E E N:290.]0(16�) 1 -•- _� / F[R SERFTING AIE EA:SI9IG CONDITKNS PfdOR 10 841)/1/1/15 E OIT. 190.24(91'/1) / EX SN MM - _ -___-__ DONS1RUclIp1. / 1 I y RII:29666 -'-� /3' --_ E M:19297(I!'N) l /' SWI- E N:291.14 112.4) / 0Y HELDR(FN MAS CONOUtIm fFBRU,WY I7-N.2015 r.,I i ,' E N:291.13(12-5) - - \ 3 SE4r1CAL DAVM:ELEVATIONS PILE BASED ON Cl1Y OF 116AR04 ��. Y E our:29092(I2 p. - -- _ _ _ TAX IOT 8300191)1101W N0 142 AT 1NE IE COMIE.4 OF NMT 9991 AIM SW 1E r.294.94(9259) - � 290 NAP 1s 1 36AASUMP:213.01 1 ' 1g: a s1M cR `\ Lor s III/ 691/1 ANNR MM A NOD 29 ELEVATION a}{0.05 FEET CD 1 I % : I; I REE 291.97 1 I i 4 l OS MAP ODES NOT CCN51'UlE A PROPERTY BOUFIARY SUNSET O - ,1' i E OUT:79536(WS) o a ' " % 113 •' 1 i Sur:29412 I W ( 5 SLIMY n MT VAX 9191 p1RKVp'S STAMP AND SIGW,IRE I - EE 1 I I (1 / I 0 MONO FOOIPMN10 ARE MEASURED 10 SIMNG 11LESS N0105 Y�' 1"- TAX LOT 9100 I 1 I 7 LOT 2200 Orrn,9sc CONTACT SURSETOR rim a3Esm+s REGARDNc o$- ) r I-} •,,, TAR MAP IS 1361A J a TAX MOP,s 1 z,DD 8116111/10 NI I a • / Ai S • : 947113 / i \ TAX LOT 8400 1 ' Lor 13 7. COHTOUR NOVA!s I Four . r = IAX MAP IS 1 36AA 1- ' _ / I- LOT 6 & OCT TREES HAAE A DUMEWI1 of 5'MID GREATER,MEASURED IOW KWIC Mt ‘, _1 1 , I r. \ AT BREAST HOOK WERE 9)05(533 Ar Das 1943,: - - Ail I 11 3,\ sod 0- ,--- I / 3 \ 3,y ,h. 1 1 N I I TAX IOT 2300 TAX LOl 9800 NKR RETANI5.NATE ' ' `1.4 L TAX I OT 9200 1 � r` 10679 TAXXMAv 1s 1 2503 TAX MAP IS 1 3691 TAS YIP IS 1 MA r 1 LOT 20 TAX LOT 9900 1. : 1 1 1 , 'I IDT 14 i �i •I,\ ler 14 TAX 900PS 1614 EX SA'MN ''I. 1 )nor--,I I 1 / TAX LOT 8500 10355 ,�„I�I r Loi 2I MC 307.06 r 'i _ I E IN 797.49(6%) 1 l 1� 1, ; -- _-- - I TM NAP 1s r 6AA I I 1\.it('E 9t 291.97(16rz) I•: ! 1 I ` Lor 7 551IIII \ E Rrt:291.69 ITEM .•" • Y , IliiI Itl 1ROCK RETA9ING WALL' )l 1*. 1 1 I �+r - 13 25,00' 1 Fi L e Iv' 0Q y TAX LOT 9700 ,f151NMEErs 111 l - (} 3 TAX LOT 9300 I r--Inor •I TAX LOT 2400,, AdLOT Ro 1200 - -' t_ i I es FME1A 5N w "'Fir )TAX LOT 8800 ` T I I)1 AJ 1 Ro �+t pYCT 6 k A I TAX TSU K 13191 TAX LO 8600 1as17 >1 FX SAN 9151 E AJ7'141. (�aA: - I• E OUT:303.63(LMKH)•,, ). I LOT 1IAXMAP Is1169111 I 891:75axpSI16P:30201 I S ) AM LOT D IL IN.24135(4'S) Uy � O 5ROTC 5/1211 DMIN CE[550009rf'• I` I I IEFt300.06(I ) QI IE OUt 21!16(6 91 ROCK RETANNG MALL JIWI .I a�it n9T es6prM 894:521895 •.0511 10656 -_.it1=�W6�,PUE {I '. TAX LOT 8700E N:2,a6o(,5'S) sI�l��' 2 I . I I r TAX YM:S 13691 I�.' I' TAX MN IS 1 2500 ��vvee N 1H 73635(SW) 1Ds1R TAX A LU 125UU ,SQL &rt fiGff M�!T TAX LOT 9600 _� 1 t, TAX LOT 9400 ! ? 20.1Y/P/BUD SAA7TARr 5484/1 LOT 9 E N:«9���h) 11 W I �� TAX MAP IS 1 36AA IAA LOl 9500 (� is.. i '1 EX SN(:1 l0!16 LOT 16 n,} TM MAP IS 1 AAA I _ I -,I' TAX NM IS 1 3654 ` _. l Rµ:24694 I a, m5[7ACN } I LOT,6 I T MID 20.03'PRIVATE EWE 237.96 02'1) I s LOT I7 y,Pq F I TOM DRAMA UMW! 10633, ,i, I / / wuv�'2i4sio(10 SE) B.Uf ROARING MAIL .. WOOD MICE ,.i IU t SI }S, �It gfN6 01,10167._ ., I O 1030) / /) -1. ,,,....Ase-i-77:-.--a-", / /// �- 'Y i t10i1 7 f I ,/� TI Rotx WALL r KCK - -- - -- - -:- _ .-7S- - -.=�. L / /�1 ,r.'P Bl.. .a._. II :(9'0648 - --�-I-1 A _ - .A, issi�Ea-70''_. ..__,,,1'-� .. �+ 0. \ - ,-- \��\\\\`'.3,r e !' 47`6.\ 17 \14'6 cS:,'� ti NOUN a P LSP OMIT 17.='� _ . "'"'"4.,.ft--= rc.��� \. I . 10c i >�--t-I 1 ' e22aor ,.1.- 1 010x/ \ VI -.�I < t• ��� „< ( 1 w \\\ \ \ \��� I I'�4 11{ - `RR IT i T p III \ �\ \ ) \ \ : .�, , /PLOT 1, I i 3� r"_ •t+- ._ Alvnc 1 IODOit \ \ 1 I l A. 1 \I I \ �'1? \\ 1 \ I I I 1 1 I I 1 �) /)\1111 �� \l�\\ yy 1 \ �I ' F°""�`T� III/ - F ROUE 1 1 1 1 l \ \\1 1 1 ‘ I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 /( 1\\\\\\\� \\ �\ 1 rr'� CUSE 88,4514,: G \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 \ \I \ 1\ ` ) \I \ \ \ t ( I ( \\ \ \\ 1 1 I j EX SIa h 1 1 1 � � \ �\ \ \ \ \ 1 1 Il(11\ \1\I� � ��n.�'7 •I Pk 216.20 1ao5c • I a \ 1 1 \ \ 1 1 1 y \ 1 \ �� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \\ \\ Q''j /1111 /// //"/ ''-m( I `�+�- 3 DDT 244.75(IS,I) TAX LOT 2600 1 1 1 I 1 1 \ \ 1 1 III \ \ \ I • \ �^�\ = ��\� ' SUMP.291.75 TAX MNK 19111 -TY,Y PSC WM TAX 10T 300 � 11 \ 1 \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ 1 1 I\ \ TAX OAF�Oa,, 1 \\ "---\----1 tli \\.\:)111 II // / %/ i�/1.' / I tan .o'of CVLSEDT ouF•ALL S \ ' "'y�j '�,. FX SN AO E 722.91' TAX MN IS 136AA 1 1°/"\/ 1 1 1 '''',..4-9-'34,74°1\-----\---4-3:\ 17.0891 5484)1- \ I \ , ,xAA. \ \ \---a.11 \\\ t '\)/,// i3,/ ......4„, /... .PLOT 2 -,'3., --T -- I P 247.42 5.63.. 1 1 \ �A PEt EXt\��, 1 ,\\\\ � 11 �\ - ) \ 111 11102\44\1\ \\ \),/////1161111; /1 //Irrid:117// / / sj.�! 1 E a1 29467.flet�W)/ I / / 1 ,.. 815261 \ \ X100» mo9t . I 1 a L, 102 I/I/!/ fi \: _RI( 1 I I I 1 1 1 \ \I I\1 \ \ \ 'Q020 \ \ - . r 1II1 � I('((Illr 111 \\\lI ' /L�! \\ 's c-- l 1 , 19 I 1 l \ \ li�` \ \ \ \ \�\�\� I I I I \ \ , \\�1(\\1\II11�II I 1 11t� x \ u I ' .I 1p t I \ r I \ \ \ \ I,A' \ \ I \1111 I 111 6,5:. . I, .. - o \ 1 I l I \ \ 1\161 \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 11111 10248 jM 111111(111 o�=--%..`:S `I; 1 a 02, , I 1 \\ 1 \ \ \ 1 \ III \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ 1 \ I 1��1 1 4//61\lllll\\�\` 11;8 •• I --------]F( 1 1005 \ \ \ 1 1 \ \ \ 'g' t & / I„\ ����\,\\\\ ,,'T,« d,, I/ 111---1-, . 1 TAX LOT � � SCALE 1" = 60 FEET I I t © 1 1 \ \r 11\i, \ \ \ \ 1 I \ \�� ~~ -1 a 1.11111111.6111e _____ .� < 1 I \ 1 \ 1.I \ \ \ \ \ •\ \ 0091\1 1 (I \ \ I \�N; ��� �\\\\\� 1 r 2.700 I I 1 \ / 21 1 1 ,8848\ ,1 1.1 '� \ \ \ \ \ \3I \ \ \1 l I ►1 11:55\ \ >\ �` d'�,,e��\� \\\�� �I_ �R WNW TAI 110 N'238° x 0� 1. . s4s° /^ \ >f�0 0 o e , • �E� . 16v I c� - • I i p1 2nysirrM 60 0 24 36 46 60 ` --r--- -r -- -r ",-1 1-1 •.1. O v v`- o. \ \\ : �{ n 9 ,T1 I _1- . I T: r----r EPEC--r--_-.. _--r----."- e - -w.- �\ \�a ` \ yrA1 Rf 0 \ "1.41 -4 -6'fAN-..,_ iM1 NH EX WEN 1 i �` `�� DATE: 4/1/2015 - LT- -- 894532747 EX SAN IM 01: 12.03 I I '1 � \ I 0 Ot 32013(Es) mit 317.26 E 05 29609(I6 1500'EDE SANITARY SERER EASEMENT ERIR lf SAY W E ON 320.22(nil E N 29465(TEN) E OUT.290.22(EN I FOR DE MEIN Cf METZGER EE N:26 72(6'S).32 I - E N:306.05(CS) E Dur:235.3(ICS) I SANITARY DISNCi(CLEAN WAER E OUT:20162(EH) Y`9j�p, CLOS- I FIGURE 4:EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP • 1E OUT:29416(+6Y) SFR01S)PER 60011 513 PA(t 35 ll '.i--I`\ 11111 r I - ,1---1N . OAK STREET ESTATES NO.2 1 1 1 '12+ \ I DRAWN BY,SRP CHECKED BY: SR DWG:4294 CWS STIE MAPS ,X)B: 4294 I it 1-a_aTAv V, r-� AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC 1 I TE,3CA 11 ,I-- \ I 12965 SW HERMAN ROAD, SUITE 100 I I TUALATIN, OR 97062 1 I I �1 I I \'. 1 ,PHONE: 503.563.6151 FAX: 503.563.6152 Page 3 of 4 CWS FIN Number 15-000983 • III I _-—____ i j SW 70TH PLACE_ 1~ -- -- .x • • 1 ' 1 • r, ` _-- I -. 1 I -- -- 1 • o sjd 1 i I �h �U. S-c)Coq of • 1 '11 I tL lg3 -$4 1\,1 i ••". I Approved a 15 • 1 1 1 ••al. TATA u10S 19 00 J ` Clean Water Serviceg x • 1`,1 1 ' 1� Lor 13 TAX LOT 8400 )li - Er1 JI?' i6'��i,11Y6 l !L E v 1< a 11 1 ' I \ TAX IS I >9AL ' By---,Date itit I I :).1,- • TAX LOT 9800 'hi• • 1 • , TAX LOT 9200 1 �i I • 1 II TAT MAP IS 1 36AA LOT 20 TAX LW 9900 �• r TAX MAP IS 1 NAA • i I I \ 1 1 1 Lara r I TAX 110 IS I36AA I ' 1 Iy ; '1 i I 01 n 11 11 r __ ���` TA! LOT 18ie5AA00 Iosss,. i II I I I [ , l I II TAX LOT 970(} +. 1 t� 11 I _` I s TAX IL Is 1 36AA - t TAX LOT 9300 I I 1 ' l- TAX LOT 2400 LOT 19 I .TAX LOT 10200 -$I I TAX uw Is 1,6AA I 1 I V' rAX uAr Is 1 256a I ►AiI WP IS 1 3-0-AA !.� . --- emr 0 :v I t.I i • ' L01 15 I TAX LOT 8800 8 \� los,) . 1 CC 1 I •`�II LOT 15 I • I1 I TAR 3LwTio]614 TAXrMAP15183500 \J I ' 1 IAT 6 ,,11 i s l., ,.I I • i` 1 • 1- Qi" : 11 • $ • I TAX LOT 8700 18sn i I 1065e- TAX I OT 9600 � 3' I 1 TAX M ors3 36,A 10538 i i Z 1 . TAX 1L1AP0512500 2500 TAX LOT 9500 I TAX LOT 9400 ` I ;u.; TAX LIA ISI 36AA 1•I TAX MAP IS 1 36AA I 1 I LOT u • LOT 18 4a wrap 3cM I I Lor w I ` i X11 I 101691 I rm14 1 las) 'AI O y 1 w_ oo — __ 10165 - _O 11 ,I 1 •'0 10611 awn 0/ O _-1_1 I. r iiiii1 — 10.6616 sr J'�'4M 910.950 Sr $$ B I I :11,410 Sr j L L - B �' L. ' I TAX LOT 2600 TAX wi ii 230) TAX LOT 302 TAX LUI 300 TAX YAP IS 136AA TAX WP Is 136AA r -1 r -1 I I --------s r PROPSED"OAK STREET —, L / }-I '^. 1 ESTATES NO. SUBDIVISION i �tr-_-.F. r - 1 2 3 I14091 3 14123 Y I r !4014 sr 115.6 Y —-- -_ - - .- -. _O" L J L J I L J L` i lgT36 Sr • I • I n O ' --- _ f I 1f �� s��1 I lrc� i I o SCALE 1" - 60 FEET - �.SW ggTy'�-� U -- - �`rrrte>► Rr � =.-- � :� _sL --- --9- -- - --- ---�- 1== ' ----•- ii ;ttss�cv w� �.�. i I AVEN • o 60 0 24 36 46 60 • ® ,\ l` 1I ! I,w �w. r� M ' ,. vftio w• � as. . .. �� 8, 8111, DATE: 4/3/2015tato ..Ramelusstsarsareirs _ wissitio �sm,)•. '\ � ;/ • 1 TAX LOT 303 i I ' TAX MAP IS 136AA 1 ` FIGURE 5:SITE PLAN MAP r PROPOSED"OAK STREET \ . \ TRACT•A' ESTATES"SUBDIVISION ' w. I (SUB 2014-001) : F 1 i I OAK STREET ESTATES NO.2 2 3 4 5 8 • Q ••0 ;;;= r 8 1 DRAWN BY:SRPICHECKED BY: SR IDWG:4294 CWS STIE PLAN JOB: 4294 III i ;AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC j _ _ 112965 SW HERMAN ROAD, SUITE 100 • } i z . -- — — ! TUALATIN, OR 97062 1119( I w ==- --..— .. I PHONE: 503.563.6151 FAX: 503.563.6152 Page 4 of 4 i SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW APPLICATION FOR OAK STREET ESTATES NO. 2 APPLICANT: Michael Biggi Re Max Equity Group 3825 SW Hall Blvd Beaverton, OR 97005 ENGINEER/PLANNER/SURVEYOR: AKS Engineering & Forestry 12965 SW Herman Road, Suite 100 Tualatin, OR 97062 503.925.8799 Contact: Mimi Doukas,AICP, RLA PROPERTY ADDRESSES: 6909 SW Oak Street Tigard, OR 97223 OWNERS: Susan O. McGuire • 6909 SW Oak Street Tigard, OR 97223 TAX LOTS: Map 15136AA, tax lot 400 SIZE: 1.90 Acres EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5 III imOAK STREET ESTATES NO.2-CITY OF TIGARD JANUARY 2016 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW APPLICATION PAGE 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The applicant, Michael Biggi, is requesting approval of a Type I Sensitive Lands Review for steep slopes of 25% or greater, with less than 50 cubic yards of material being disturbed. This written narrative,together with preliminary plans and other documentation included in the application materials, establishes that the application is in compliance with all applicable approval criteria. This documentation represents substantial evidence and provides the basis for City staff to approve the application. II. SITE DESCRIPTION AND VICINITY INFORMATION The subject site is generally located at the dead end of SW Locust Street and the dead end of SW 69th Avenue. The property is currently vacant. Description of Surrounding Area Area Jurisdiction Zoning Land Uses North Tigard R-4.5 Single-family detached residential South Tigard R-4.5 Single-family detached residential East Tigard R-4.5 Single-family detached residential West Tigard R-4.5 Single-family detached residential Public Utilities Service Provider Size Location Distance from Site Water City of Tigard 12" SW Locust Street Adjacent (W) Sanitary Sewer City of Tigard 18" SW Locust Street Adjacent (W) Sanitary Sewer City of Tigard 8" SW 69th Avenue Adjacent (E) IIIStorm Sewer City of Tigard 12" SW Locust Street Adjacent (W) Transportation SW 69th Avenue and SW Locust Street are both classified as Local Streets and are under the jurisdiction of the City of Tigard. SW Locust Street is proposed to continue through the new development and will have a planned right-of-way width of 50 feet. SW Ventura Drive, a Neighborhood Route along the northern property line of the subject site, is not proposed to be accessed by any of the new lots. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting approval of a Type I Sensitive Lands Review for steep slopes of 25%or greater, with less than 50 cubic yards of material being disturbed.The permit is necessary for the development of eight lots into single-family detached homes. The northern portion of the site slopes steeply down to the north, with 45%to 65%grades.The only development to occur within steep slopes(25%or greater) is the construction of sanitary and storm sewer laterals, which will connect to SW Ventura Drive. Project History On November 16, 2015, the City of Tigard conditionally approved a Type II application for the Oak Street Estates No. 2 Subdivision (2015-00011). Condition #7 listed in the decision specifies: "Prior to any site work the applicant shall submit a Type II sensitive lands permit or provide evidence than less than 50 cubic yards of material is disturbed within the slopes that are 25%or greater." Exhibit B verifies that 48.5 cubic yards of material will be disturbed within slopes that are 25% or greater; therefore, the applicant is submitting this Type I Sensitive Lands Review application. III AKOAK STREET ESTATES NO.2-CITY OF TIGARD JANUARY 2016 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW APPLICATION PAGE 2 IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS • City of Tigard Municipal Code Title 18: Community Development Code A- Chapter 18.390 Decision-Making Procedures Chapter 18.775 Sensitive Lands Chapter 18.390 DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES 18.390.020 Description of Decision-Making Procedures A. General. All development permit applications shall be decided by using one of the following procedure types. The procedure type assigned to each action governs the decision-making process for that permit, except to the extent otherwise required by applicable state or federal law.The director shall be responsible for assigning specific procedure types to individual permit or action requests, as requested. Special alternative decision-making procedures have been developed by the city in accordance with existing state law,and are codified in Section 18.390.070. B. Types defined.There are four types of decision-making procedures,as follows: 1. Type I Procedure.Type I procedures apply to ministerial permits and actions containing clear and objective approval criteria.Type I actions are decided by the director without public notice and without a public hearing. 2. Type II Procedure. Type II procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria. Type II actions are decided by the director with public notice and an opportunity for a hearing. If any party with standing appeals a director's Type II decision, the appeal of such decision will be heard by the hearings officer. • 3. Type III Procedure. Type III procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that predominantly contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III actions are decided by the Hearings Office (Type III-HO), the Planning Commission (Type III-PC), or Design Review Board (Type III-C) with appeals to or review by the City Council. 4. Type IV Procedure. Type IV procedures apply to legislative matters. Legislative matters involve the creation, revision, or large-scale implementation of public policy. Type IV matters are considered initially by the Planning Commission with final decisions made by the City Council. C. Summary of permits by decision-making procedure type. Table 18.390.1 summarizes the various land use permits by the type of decision-making procedure. Table 18.390.1 (abbreviated) Summary of Permits by Type of Decision-Making Procedure Type Type II (18.390.040) Cross-Reference(s) Sensitive Lands Permits 18.775 - In 25%+ Slope Response: As shown in Table 18.390.1, sensitive land reviews are reviewed as Type II land use applications with an administrative decision; however, Tigard Community Development Code 18.775.020.E.1.c stipulates: "The director shall review minimal ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations involving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material, except in floodway areas by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030 • subject to compliance with all of the standards in this chapter." Furthermore, in the Conditions of Approval for the Oak Street Estates Subdivision(2015-00011),Condition#7 4 OAK STREET ESTATES NO.2-CITY OF TIGARD JANUARY 201 6 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW APPLICATION PAGE 3 specifies: "Prior to any site work the applicant shall submit a Type II sensitive lands permit • or provide evidence than less than 50 cubic yards of material is disturbed within the slopes that are 25%or greater." Exhibit B verifies that 48 cubic yards of material will be disturbed in slope areas at or exceeding a 25%grade;therefore,this application will be reviewed by means of a Type I procedure. 18.390.030 Type I Procedure A. Preapplication conference. A preapplication conference is not required for a Type I action. Response: A preapplication conference specific to this Type I application was not held, as it is not required.This criterion is met. B. Application requirements. 1. Application forms. Type I applications shall be made on forms provided by the director as provided by 18.390.080.E.1. 2. Application requirements.Type I applications shall: a. Include the information requested on the application form; b. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; and c. Be accompanied by the required fee. Response: Application forms are included in Exhibit D. The applicable approval criteria have been addressed in this narrative. A check for the review fee is included with the application package.This criterion is met. IIIC. Administrative decision requirements. The director's decision shall address all of the relevant approval criteria. Based on the criteria and the facts contained within the record, the director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny the requested permit or action. Response: The applicable approval criteria have been addressed in this narrative and are supported by the attached documents. The administrative decision will be based on the same applicable approval criteria and findings of fact. This criterion will be met. D. Final decision. The director's decision is final for purposes of appeal on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. The director's decision is not appealable locally,and is the final decision of the city. Response: The City of Tigard will render a decision, which will be final and not appealable locally. E. & F. Sections not used. G. Effective date.The director's decision is effective on the day after it is final. Response: The Director's decision shall be effective the day after it becomes final. Chapter 18.775 SENSITIVE LANDS 18.775.020 Applicability of Uses—Permitted, Prohibited,and Nonconforming A. CWS stormwater connection permit. All proposed development must obtain a stormwater connection permit from CWS pursuant to its design and construction standards.... III AK OAK STREET ESTATES NO.2-CITY OF TIGARD JANUARY 201 6 .5 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW APPLICATION PAGE 4 Response: A Service Provider Letter from CWS is included in this application as Exhibit E. Condition III of Approval #6 in this letter states: "Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from Clean Water Services or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B."This criterion is met. E. Administrative sensitive lands review. 1. Administrative sensitive lands permits in the 100-year floodplain, drainageway, slopes that are 25% or greater, and unstable ground shall be obtained from the appropriate community development division for the following: a. The city engineer shall review the installation of public support facilities by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030 subject to compliance with all of the standards in this chapter; Response: Preliminary composite utilities plans are included with this Type I application in Exhibit A. This criterion is met. b. The city engineer shall review minimal ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations involving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material,except in the floodway area, for land that is within public easements and rights-of-way by means of a Type I procedure,as governed by Section 18.390.030 subject to the compliance with all of the standards in this chapter; Response: Exhibit B verifies that 48.5 cubic yards of material will be disturbed within slopes that are 25% or greater. The site is not located within a floodway area; therefore, this Sensitive • Lands Permit will be reviewed as a Type I application. c. The director shall review minimal ground disturbance(s)or landform alterations involving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material, except in the floodway area by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030 subject to compliance with all of the standards in this chapter; Response: Exhibit B verifies that less than 48.5 cubic yards of material will be disturbed within slopes that are 25% or greater. The site is not located within a floodway area; therefore, this Sensitive Lands Permit will be reviewed as a Type I application. d. The director shall review the repair,reconstruction, or improvement of an existing structure or utility, the cost of which is less than 50% of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction provided no development occurs in the floodway by means of a Type I procedure,as governed by Section 18.390.030 subject to compliance with all of the standards in this chapter; Response: The project does not involve the repair, reconstruction, or improvement of existing structures or utilities.This criterion does not apply. e. The building official shall review building permits for accessory structures which are 120 to 528 square feet in size, except in the floodway area;and 4110 AK OAK STREET ESTATES N0.2- JANUARY 201 6 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW APPLICATIONCITYOFTIGARD PAGE 5 Response: The project does not involve the construction of accessory structures. This criterion does • not apply. f. The director shall review applications for paving on private property, except in the floodway area by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030 subject to compliance with all of the standards in this chapter. Response: The project does not involve the construction of accessory structures. This criterion does not apply. 2. The responsible community development division shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a development permit, as described above, based on the standards set forth in Sections 18.775.050, 18.775.070,and 18.775.080. Response: Section 18.775.050—General Provisions for Wetlands does not apply. There are no wetlands on the subject site. Section 18.775.070 is addressed in the next section of this narrative. 18.775.070 Sensitive Land Permits A. Permits required. An applicant, who wishes to develop within a sensitive area, as defined in Chapter 18.775, must obtain a permit in certain situations. Depending on the nature and intensity of the proposed activity within a sensitive area,either a Type II or Type III permit is required, as delineated in Sections 18.775.020.F and G. The approval criteria for various kinds of sensitive areas,e.g.,floodplain,are presented in subsections B through E of this section. • Response: As discussed in the previous sections of this narrative, 18.775.020.E.1.c specifies that the Director shall review minimal ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations involving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material as a Type I application. Furthermore, in the Conditions of Approval for the Oak Street Estates Subdivision (2015-00011), Condition #7 specifies: "Prior to any site work the applicant shall submit a Type II sensitive lands permit or provide evidence than less than 50 cubic yards of material is disturbed within the slopes that are 25% or greater." Exhibit B verifies that less than 50 cubic yards of material will be disturbed within slopes that are 25%or greater.This minimal level of activity within a sensitive area requires a Type I permit. B. Within the 100-year floodplain. The hearings officer shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied:... Response: The subject site does not contain any floodplain areas. This criterion does not apply. C. With steep slopes. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit on slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title; Response: The provisions of this Title have been addressed. ?. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development III will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; AK OAK STREET ESTATES NO.2-CITY OF TIGARD JANUARY 2016 aimmoS SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW APPLICATION PAGE 6 Response: The only development planned to occur within steep slopes (25% or greater) is the III construction of sanitary and storm sewer laterals,which will connect to SW Ventura Drive. There is no alternative for service connections based on the elevations of the proposed structures and existing infrastructure depths. 3. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation,ground instability,or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; Response: The proposed development has been designed to avoid building in the steep slope areas to minimize total cuts and fills. Full erosion control measures will be followed per Clean Water Services standards.The design does not increase the risk of erosion. This criterion is met. 4. The structures are appropriately sited and designed to ensure structural stability and proper drainage of foundation and crawl space areas for development with any of the following soil conditions:wet/high water table; high shrink-swell capability; compressible/organic; and shallow depth-to- bedrock;and Response: As noted above, the proposed development has been designed to avoid building in the steep slope areas to minimize total cuts and fills. Building pads have been provided for future homes to allow for the underground conditions, including depth to bedrock. A Geotechnical Report has been provided in Exhibit F of the application materials. This criterion is met. III 5. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening. Response: All disturbed areas will be replanted with grass and vegetation, per the erosion control standards of Clean Water Services. D. Within drainageways.The appropriate approval authority shall approve,approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit within drainageways based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied:... Response: The subject site does not contain any drainageways. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. E. Within wetlands. The director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit within wetlands based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied:... Response: The subject site does not contain any wetlands.Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 18.775.080 Application Submission Requirements All applications for uses and activities identified in Sections 18.775.020.A through G shall be made on forms provided by the director and must include the following information in graphic, tabular and/or narrative form. The specific information on each of the following is available from the director: IIIA. A CWS stormwater connection permit; AOAK STREET ESTATES NO.2-CITY OF TIGARD JANUARY 2016 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW APPLICATION PAGE 7 B. A site plan; 0 C. A grading plan; D. An urban forestry plan per Chapter 18.790(for Sections 18.775.020.F and G); and E. A landscaping plan. Response: Exhibit A in the application packet contains the Site Plan, Grading Plan, Landscape Plan, and Urban Forestry Plan for the approved Oak Street Estates No. 2 land use application. Exhibit E contains a Service Provider Letter from CWS. A CWS Stormwater Connection Permit will be acquired prior to construction. Therefore, this standard is met. 18.775.090 Special Provisions for Development within Locally Significant Wetlands and Along the Tualatin River, Fanno Creek, Ball Creek,and the South Fork of Ash Creek Response: The subject site is not located along the Tualatin River, Fanno Creek, Ball Creek, or Ash Creek.Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 18.775.100 Adjustments to Underlying Zone Standards Response: No adjustments to the underlying zone standards are requested with this application.This criterion does not apply. 18.775.110 Density Transfer Density may be transferred from vegetated corridor areas as provided in Sections 18.715.020 through 18.715.030. Response: No density transfers from vegetated corridor areas are requested with this application. This criterion does not apply. • 18.775.120 Variances to Section 18.775.090 Standards Response: No variances are requested with this application.This criterion does not apply. 18.775.130 Plan Amendment Option Response: The application does not request plan amendments.This criterion does not apply. 18.775.140 Significant Habitat Areas Map Verification Procedures Response: The subject site does not contain any significant habitat areas. This criterion does not apply. V. CONCLUSION The listed findings and accompanying documentation demonstrate that the proposal is consistent with the applicable provisions of the City of Tigard Community Development Code. Therefore, the applicant respectfully requests approval of the proposed Oak Street Estates No. 2 Sensitive Lands Review application. 1111 AK OAK STREET ESTATES NO.2-CITY OF TIGARD JANUARY 201 6 .3 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW APPLICATION PAGE 8 GeoPlcitic immranrim • Real-World Geotechnical Solutions Investigation • Design •Construction Support June 3, 2015 Project No. 15-3757 Mike Biggi 3825 SW Hall Blvd. Beaverton, Oregon 97005 CC: Mimi Doukas, AKS Engineering & Forestry via email: mimid(c�aks-eng.com SUBJECT: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OAK STREET ESTATES NO. 2 6909 SW OAK STREET TIGARD, OREGON This report presents the results of a geotechnical engineering study conducted by GeoPacific Engineering, Inc. (GeoPacific) for the above-referenced project. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and to provide geotechnical recommendations for site development. This geotechnical study was performed in accordance • with GeoPacific Proposal No. P-5167, dated March 6, 2015, and your subsequent authorization of our proposal and General Conditions for Geotechnical Services. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The subject property is approximately 1.89 acres in size and located on the north side of SW Oak Street in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Topography is predominantly gently to moderately sloping to the north at grades of 10 to 15 percent. The northern quarter of the site is steeply sloping with grades on the order of 50 to exceeding 100 percent. Three structures currently occupy the site and vegetation consists primarily of short grasses and dense to sparse trees. The preliminary site plan indicates proposed development includes 8 lots for single family homes, construction of approximately 150 lineal feet of new streets, and associated underground utilities. A grading plan has not been provided for our review; however, we anticipate that maximum cuts and fills will be on the order of about 8 feet or less. REGIONAL AND LOCAL GEOLOGIC SETTING The subject site lies within the Willamette Valley/Puget Sound lowland, a broad structural depression situated between the Coast Range on the west and the Cascade Range on the east. A series of discontinuous faults subdivide the Willamette Valley into a mosaic of fault-bounded, • 14835 SW 72nd Avenue Tel (503) 598-8445 Portland, Oregon 97224 Fax (503) 941-9281 Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 structural blocks (Yeats et al., 1996). Uplifted structural blocks form bedrock highlands, while • down-warped structural blocks form sedimentary basins. The subject site is underlain by Quaternary age (last 1.6 million years) loess, a windblown silt deposit that mantles older deposits, basalt bedrock, and elevated areas in the Portland region (Beeson et al., 1989; Madin, 1990). The loess generally consists of massive silt deposited following repeated catastrophic flooding events in the Willamette Valley, the last of which occurred about 10,000 years ago. In localized areas, the loess includes buried paleosois that developed between depositional events. Regionally, the total thickness of loess ranges from 5 feet to greater than 100 feet. Published regional geologic mapping indicates that the subject site is underlain by the Boring Lava lithologic unit which consists of basaltic and basaltic andesite lava flows erupted from a series of local volcanic vents during Plio-Pleistocene time (about 600,000 thousand to 2.6 million years ago) (Beeson et al., 1989; Madin, 1990). The total thickness of the Boring Lava unit ranges from greater than 600 feet near vents to less than 50 feet on the outer margins. REGIONAL SEISMIC SETTING At least three major fault zones capable of generating damaging earthquakes are thought to exist in the vicinity of the subject site. These include the Portland Hills Fault Zone, the Gales Creek- Newberg-Mt. Angel Structural Zone, and the Cascadia Subduction Zone. Portland Hills Fault Zone 1111 The Portland Hills Fault Zone is a series of NW-trending faults that include the central Portland Hills Fault, the western Oatfield Fault, and the eastern East Bank Fault. These faults occur in a northwest-trending zone that varies in width between 3.5 and 5.0 miles. The combined three faults vertically displace the Columbia River Basalt by 1,130 feet and appear to control thickness changes in late Pleistocene (approx. 780,000 years) sediment (Madin, 1990). The Portland Hills Fault occurs along the Willamette River at the base of the Portland Hills, and is about 3 miles northeast of the site. The East Bank Fault roughly parallels the Portland Hills Fault on the eastern side of the Willamette River and is located approximately 8 miles northeast of the site. The Oatfield Fault occurs along the western side of the Portland Hills, and is about 5 miles northeast of the site. The Oatfield Fault is considered to be potentially seismogenic (Wong, et al., 2000). Madin and Mabey (1996) indicate the Portland Hills Fault Zone has experienced Late Quaternary (last 780,000 years) fault movement; however, movement has not been detected in the last 20,000 years. The accuracy of the fault mapping is stated to be within 500 meters (Wong, et al., 2000). No historical seismicity is correlated with the mapped portion of the Portland Hills Fault Zone, but in 1991 a M3.5 earthquake occurred on a NW-trending shear plane located 1.3 miles east of the fault (Yelin, 1992). Although there is no definitive evidence of recent activity, the Portland Hills Fault Zone is assumed to be potentially active (Geomatrix Consultants, 1995). • 3757 Oak Street Estates No. 2 GR GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 Gales Creek-Newberg-Mt. Angel Structural Zone • The Gales Creek-Newberg-Mt. Angel Structural Zone is a 50-mile-long zone of discontinuous, NW-trending faults that lies about 16 miles southwest of the subject site. These faults are recognized in the subsurface by vertical separation of the Columbia River Basalt and offset seismic reflectors in the overlying basin sediment (Yeats et al., 1996; Werner et al., 1992). A geologic reconnaissance and photogeologic analysis study conducted for the Scoggins Dam site in the Tualatin Basin revealed no evidence of deformed geomorphic surfaces along the structural zone (Unruh et al., 1994). No seismicity has been recorded on the Gales Creek Fault or Newberg Fault (the fault closest to the subject site); however, these faults are considered to be potentially active because they may connect with the seismically active Mount Angel Fault and the rupture plane of the 1993 M5.6 Scotts Mills earthquake (Werner et al. 1992; Geomatrix Consultants, 1995). Cascadia Subduction Zone The Cascadia Subduction Zone is a 680-mile-long zone of active tectonic convergence where oceanic crust of the Juan de Fuca Plate is subducting beneath the North American continent at a rate of 4 cm per year (Goldfinger et al., 1996). A growing body of geologic evidence suggests that prehistoric subduction zone earthquakes have occurred (Atwater, 1992; Carver, 1992; Peterson et al., 1993; Geomatrix Consultants, 1995). This evidence includes: (1) buried tidal marshes recording episodic, sudden subsidence along the coast of northern California, Oregon, and Washington, (2) burial of subsided tidal marshes by tsunami wave deposits, (3) paleoliquefaction features, and (4) geodetic uplift patterns on the Oregon coast. Radiocarbon dates on buried tidal marshes indicate a recurrence interval for major subduction zone • earthquakes of 250 to 650 years with the last event occurring 300 years ago (Atwater, 1992; Carver, 1992; Peterson et al., 1993; Geomatrix Consultants, 1995). The inferred seismogenic portion of the plate interface lies roughly along the Oregon coast at depths of between 20 and 40 miles. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Our site-specific exploration for this report was conducted on April 6, 2015. A total of 5 exploratory test pits were excavated with a trackhoe to depths of 3.5 to 10 feet at the approximate locations indicated on Figure 2. It should be noted that test pit locations were located in the field by pacing or taping distances from apparent property corners and other site features shown on the plans provided. As such, the locations of the explorations should be considered approximate. A GeoPacific geologist continuously monitored the field exploration program and logged the test pits. Soils observed in the explorations were classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Rock hardness was classified in accordance with Table 1, modified from the ODOT Rock Hardness Classification Chart, which is presented on the following page. During exploration, our geologist also noted geotechnical conditions such as soil consistency, moisture and groundwater conditions. Logs of test pits are attached to this report. The following report sections are based on the exploration program and summarize subsurface conditions encountered at the site. • 3757-Oak Street Estates No. 2 GR 3 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 Table 1. Rock Hardness Classification Chart • ODOT Rock Unconfined Hardness Field Criteria Compressive Typical Equipment Needed For Rating Strength Excavation Extremely Soft Indented by thumbnail <100 psi Small excavator (RO) Scratched by Very Soft (R1) thumbnail, crumbled 100-1,000 psi Small excavator by rock hammer Not scratched by Medium excavator Soft(R2) thumbnail, indented 1,000-4,000 psi by rock hammer (slow digging with small excavator) Scratched or Medium to large excavator (slow to Medium Hard very slow digging), typically requires fractured by rock 4,000-8,000 psi (R3) hammer chipping with hydraulic hammer or mass excavation) Hard (R4) Scratched or 8 000-16,000 psi Slow chipping with hydraulic hammer fractured w/ difficulty and/or blasting Not scratched or Very Hard (R5) fractured after many >16,000 psi Blasting blows, hammer rebounds • Topsoil Horizon: Directly underlying the ground surface in test pits TP-1, TP-2, TP-4 and TP-5 was a topsoil horizon consisting of brown, moderately to highly organic SILT (OL-ML). The topsoil horizon was generally loose, contained many fine roots, and extended to a depth of approximately 9 to 15 inches. A thin (6 inches thick) topsoil horizon had developed on the fill in test pit TP-3. Undocumented Fill: Undocumented fill was encountered in test pit TP-3. The fill generally consisted of light brown to gray, clayey silt (ML) to silty clay (CL) with trace gravel. The fill was medium stiff to stiff and extended to a depth of 5 feet. We anticipate other areas of fill may be present near the existing structures. Loess: Underlying the topsoil horizon in test pits TP-1 and TP-2 was windblown loess belonging to the Willamette Formation. These soils generally consisted of medium stiff to very stiff, micaceous, light brown, clayey silt (ML). In test pits TP-1 and TP-2, the loess extended beyond the maximum depth of exploration (10 feet). Residual Soil: The fill in test pit TP-3 and the topsoil horizon in test pit TP-4 was underlain by light brown residual soil formed by in place decomposition of the underling Boring Lava Formation. These soils were typically stiff to very stiff, clayey silt (ML) to silty clay(CL) and contained trace gray basalt fragments. The residual soil extended beyond the maximum depth of exploration in test pits TP-3 and TP-4 (10 feet). 410 3757-Oak Street Estates No. 2 GR 4 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 Boring Lava Formation: Underlying the topsoil horizon in test pit TP-5 was weathered basalt • bedrock belonging to the Boring Lava Formation. The basalt typically contained a matrix of silt to clay and was weathered to a soft (R2) consistency. Practical refusal on medium hard (R3) basalt was reached with a medium sized excavator at a depth of 3.5 feet. A larger machine may be able to achieve greater depths. Soil Moisture and Groundwater On April 6, 2015, neither static groundwater nor groundwater seepage was encountered in test pits excavated to a depth of 10 feet below the ground surface. Experience has shown that temporary storm related perched groundwater within the near surface soils often occur over fine-grained native deposits such as those beneath the site during the wet season and particularly in mottled soils such as were identified in the test pits. It is anticipated that groundwater conditions will vary depending on the season, local subsurface conditions, changes in site utilization, and other factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Our investigation indicates that the proposed development is geotechnically feasible, provided that the recommendations of this report are incorporated into the design and sufficient geotechnical monitoring is incorporated into the construction phases of the project. In our opinion, the primary geotechnical issue for site development is the presence of steep slopes in the northern portion of the property. The rear footing-to-slope setback for the lots adjacent to the northern slope (lots 6 through 8) should be at least 10 feet horizontal; therefore depth of • embedment into native soils may be up to 5 feet vertical. The area north of test pits TP-3 and TP-4 should be avoided; building setback is illustrated on Figure 2. Site Preparation Areas of proposed buildings, streets, and areas to receive fill should be cleared of vegetation and any organic and inorganic debris. Remaining undocumented fills and any subsurface structures (dry wells, basements, driveway and landscaping fill, old utility lines, septic leach fields, etc.) should be removed and the excavations backfilled with engineered fill. Undocumented fill was encountered in test pit TP-3 to a depth of 5 feet. We anticipate that other areas of undocumented fill may exist in the vicinity of the existing structures and driveways. Organic-rich topsoil should then be stripped from native soil areas of the site. The estimated average necessary depth of removal in undisturbed areas for moderately organic soils is about 6 to 9 inches. The final depth of soil removal will be determined on the basis of a site inspection after the stripping/ excavation has been performed. Stripped topsoil should preferably be removed from the site due to the high density of the proposed development. Any remaining topsoil should be stockpiled only in designated areas and stripping operations should be observed and documented by the geotechnical engineer or his representative. Once stripping of a particular area is approved, the area must be ripped or tilled to a depth of 12 inches, moisture conditioned, root-picked, and compacted in-place prior to the placement of engineered fill or crushed aggregate base for pavement. Exposed subgrade soils should be • evaluated by the geotechnical engineer. For large areas, this evaluation is normally performed by proof-rolling the exposed subgrade with a fully loaded scraper or dump truck. For smaller 3757-Oak Street Estates No. 2 GR 5 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 areas where access is restricted, the subgrade should be evaluated by probing the soil with a • steel probe. Soft/loose soils identified during subgrade preparation should be compacted to a firm and unyielding condition, over-excavated and replaced with engineered fill (as described below), or stabilized with rock prior to placement of engineered fill. The depth of overexcavation, if required, should be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer at the time of construction. Engineered Fill All grading for the proposed development should be performed as engineered grading in accordance with the applicable building code at time of construction with the exceptions and additions noted herein. Proper test frequency and earthwork documentation usually requires daily observation and testing during stripping, rough grading, and placement of engineered fill. Imported fill material must be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to being imported to the site. Oversize material greater than 6 inches in size should not be used within 3 feet of foundation footings, and material greater than 12 inches in diameter should not be used in engineered fill. Engineered fill should be compacted in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches using standard compaction equipment. We recommend that engineered fill be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density determined by ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor) or equivalent. Field density testing should conform to ASTM D2922 and D3017, or D1556. All engineered fill should be observed and tested by the project geotechnical engineer or his representative. Typically, one density test is performed for at least every 2 vertical feet of fill placed or every 500 yd3, whichever requires more testing. Because testing is performed on an on-call basis, we • recommend that the earthwork contractor be held contractually responsible for test scheduling and frequency. Site earthwork will be impacted by soil moisture and shallow groundwater conditions. Earthwork in wet weather would likely require extensive use of cement or lime treatment, or other special measures, at considerable additional cost compared to earthwork performed under dry-weather conditions. Excavating Conditions and Utility Trenches We anticipate that the majority of on-site soils can be excavated using conventional heavy equipment such as scrapers and trackhoes to a depth of 10 feet with the occurrence of hard rock increasing in the northern portion of the site. Practical refusal was reached with a medium sized trackhoe at 3.5 feet on basalt in test pit TP-5. A larger excavator may be able to achieve greater depths. All temporary cuts in excess of 4 feet in height should be sloped in accordance with U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations (29 CFR Part 1926), or be shored. The existing native soils classify as Type B Soil and temporary excavation side slope inclinations as steep as 1 H:1 V may be assumed for planning purposes. This cut slope inclination is applicable to excavations above the water table only. Maintenance of safe working conditions, including temporary excavation stability, is the responsibility of the contractor. Actual slope inclinations at the time of construction should be determined based on safety requirements and actual soil and groundwater conditions. Saturated soils and groundwater may be encountered in utility trenches, particularly during the • wet season. We anticipate that dewatering systems consisting of ditches, sumps and pumps would be adequate for control of perched groundwater. Regardless of the dewatering system 3757-Oak Street Estates No. 2 GR 6 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 used, it should be installed and operated such that in-place soils are prevented from being • removed along with the groundwater. Vibrations created by traffic and construction equipment may cause some caving and raveling of excavation walls. In such an event, lateral support for the excavation walls should be provided by the contractor to prevent loss of ground support and possible distress to existing or previously constructed structural improvements. PVC pipe should be installed in accordance with the procedures specified in ASTM D2321. We recommend that trench backfill be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density obtained by Standard Proctor ASTM D698 or equivalent. Initial backfill lift thickness for a 3/"-0 crushed aggregate base may need to be as great as 4 feet to reduce the risk of flattening underlying flexible pipe. Recycled concrete may be utilized as trench backfill, subject to City of Tigard approval; we do not recommend using asphalt grindings as trench backfill. Subsequent lift thickness should not exceed 1 foot. If imported granular fill material is used, then the lifts for large vibrating plate-compaction equipment (e.g. hoe compactor attachments) may be up to 2 feet, provided that proper compaction is being achieved and each lift is tested. Use of large vibrating compaction equipment should be carefully monitored near existing structures and improvements due to the potential for vibration-induced damage. Adequate density testing should be performed during construction to verify that the recommended relative compaction is achieved. Typically, one density test is taken for every 4 vertical feet of backfill on each 200-lineal-foot section of trench. Erosion Control Considerations • During our field exploration program, we did not observe soil types that would be considered highly susceptible to erosion - except in the northern portion of the site, where steeply sloping gradients are present. In our opinion, the primary concern regarding erosion potential will occur during construction, in areas that have been stripped of existing pavement or vegetation. Erosion at the site during construction can be minimized by implementing the project erosion control plan, which should include judicious use of straw bales and silt fences. If used, these erosion control devices should be in place and remain in place throughout site preparation and construction. Erosion and sedimentation of exposed soils can also be minimized by quickly re-vegetating exposed areas of soil, and by staging construction such that large areas of the project site are not denuded and exposed at the same time. Areas of exposed soil requiring immediate and/or temporary protection against exposure should be covered with either mulch or erosion control netting/blankets. Areas of exposed soil requiring permanent stabilization should be seeded with an approved grass seed mixture, or hydroseeded with an approved seed-mulch-fertilizer mixture. Wet Weather Earthwork Soils underlying the site are likely to be moisture sensitive and may be difficult to handle or traverse with construction equipment during periods of wet weather. Earthwork is typically most economical when performed under dry weather conditions. Earthwork performed during the wet-weather season will probably require expensive measures such as cement treatment or • imported granular material to compact fill to the recommended engineering specifications. If earthwork is to be performed or fill is to be placed in wet weather or under wet conditions when 3757-Oak Street Estates No. 2 GR 7 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 soil moisture content is difficult to control, the following recommendations should be • incorporated into the contract specifications. Earthwork should be performed in small areas to minimize exposure to wet weather. Excavation or the removal of unsuitable soils should be followed promptly by the placement and compaction of clean engineered fill. The size and type of construction equipment used may have to be limited to prevent soil disturbance. Under some circumstances, it may be necessary to excavate soils with a backhoe to minimize subgrade disturbance caused by equipment traffic; The ground surface within the construction area should be graded to promote run-off of surface water and to prevent the ponding of water; Material used as engineered fill should consist of clean, granular soil containing less than 5 percent fines. The fines should be non-plastic. Alternatively, cement treatment of on-site soils may be performed to facilitate wet weather placement; The ground surface within the construction area should be sealed by a smooth drum vibratory roller, or equivalent, and under no circumstances should be left uncompacted and exposed to moisture. Soils which become too wet for compaction should be removed and replaced with clean granular materials; Excavation and placement of fill should be observed by the geotechnical engineer to verify that all unsuitable materials are removed and suitable compaction and site drainage is achieved; and Geotextile silt fences, straw waddles, and fiber rolls should be strategically located to control erosion. • If cement or lime treatment is used to facilitate wet weather construction, GeoPacific should be contacted to provide additional recommendations and field monitoring. Pavement Design For design purposes, we used an estimated resilient modulus of 9,000 for compacted native soil. Table 2 presents our recommended minimum pavement section for dry weather construction. Table 2. Recommended Minimum Dry-Weather Pavement Section Material Layer Public Street Compaction Standard Asphaltic Concrete(AC) 3 in. {i 91%/92% of Rice Density AASHTO T-209 Crushed Aggregate Base 3/"- 95%of Modified Proctor 0(leveling course) 2 in. AASHTO T-180 Crushed Aggregate Base 8 in 95% of Modified Proctor 1'/2"-0 AASHTO T-180 Subgrade 12 in. 95%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T-99 or equivalent 3757-Oak Street Estates No. 2 GR `{ GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 The City of Tigard may allow crushed concrete or asphalt grindings as a substitute for crushed • aggregate base rock. If permitted, the concrete or asphalt should be crushed to 2"-0 or finer and placed at a ratio of 3 inches for every 2 inches of the substituted rock section. Any pockets of organic debris or loose fill encountered during ripping or tilling should be removed and replaced with engineered fill (see Site Preparation Section). In order to verify subgrade strength, we recommend proof-rolling directly on subgrade with a loaded dump truck during dry weather and on top of base course in wet weather. Soft areas that pump, rut, or weave should be stabilized prior to paving. If pavement areas are to be constructed during wet weather, the subgrade and construction plan should be reviewed by the project geotechnical engineer at the time of construction so that condition specific recommendations can be provided. The moisture sensitive subgrade soils make the site a difficult wet weather construction project. During placement of pavement section materials, density testing should be performed to verify compliance with project specifications. Generally, one subgrade, one base course, and one asphalt compaction test is performed for every 100 to 200 linear feet of paving. Spread Foundations The proposed residential structures may be supported on shallow foundations bearing on competent undisturbed, native soils and/or engineered fill, appropriately designed and constructed as recommended in this report. Foundation design, construction, and setback requirements should conform to the applicable building code at the time of construction. The rear footing-to-slope setback for the lots adjacent to the northern slope (lots 6 through 8) should • be at least 10 feet horizontal; therefore depth of embedment into native soils should be at least 5 feet vertical. For maximization of bearing strength and protection against frost heave, spread footings should be embedded at a minimum depth of 12 inches below exterior grade. The recommended minimum widths for continuous footings supporting wood-framed walls without masonry are 12 inches for single-story, 15 inches for two-story, and 18 inches for three-story structures. Minimum foundation reinforcement should consist of a No. 4 bar at the top of stem walls, and a No. 4 bar at the bottom of footings. Concrete slab-on-grade reinforcement should consist of No. 4 bars placed on 24-inch centers in a grid pattern. The anticipated allowable soil bearing pressure is 1,500 lbs/ft2 for footings bearing on competent, native soil and/or engineered fill. A maximum chimney and column load of 30 kips is recommended for the site. The recommended maximum allowable bearing pressure may be increased by 1/3 for short-term transient conditions such as wind and seismic loading. For heavier loads, the geotechnical engineer should be consulted. The coefficient of friction between on-site soil and poured-in-place concrete may be taken as 0.40, which includes no factor of safety. The maximum anticipated total and differential footing movements (generally from soil expansion and/or settlement) are 1 inch and 3/4 inch over a span of 20 feet, respectively. We anticipate that the majority of the estimated settlement will occur during construction, as loads are applied. Excavations near structural footings should not extend within a 1 H:1 V plane projected downward from the bottom edge of footings. Footing excavations should penetrate through topsoil and any loose soil to competent subgrade that is suitable for bearing support. All footing excavations should be trimmed neat, and all loose or softened soil should be removed from the excavation bottom prior to placing reinforcing • steel bars. Due to the moisture sensitivity of on-site native soils, foundations constructed during 3757-Oak Street Estates No. 2 GR 9 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 the wet weather season may require overexcavation of footings and backfill with compacted, • crushed aggregate. Our recommendations are for house construction incorporating raised wood floors and conventional spread footing foundations. If living space of the structures will incorporate basements, a geotechnical engineer should be consulted to make additional recommendations for retaining walls, water-proofing, underslab drainage and wall subdrains. After site development, a Final Soil Engineer's Report should either confirm or modify the above recommendations. Drainage The outside edge of upslope perimeter footings may be provided with a drainage system consisting of 3-inch diameter, slotted, plastic pipe embedded in a minimum of 1 ft3 per lineal foot of clean, free-draining gravel or 3/4" — 0 rock. Water collected from the footing drains should be directed into the local storm drain system or other suitable outlet. A minimum 0.5 percent fall should be maintained throughout the drain and non-perforated pipe outlet. Down spouts and roof drains should not be connected to the foundation drains in order to reduce the potential for clogging. The footing drains should include clean-outs to allow periodic maintenance and inspection. Grades around the proposed structure should be sloped such that surface water drains away from the building. Perimeter footing drains are recommended to prevent detrimental effects of groundwater on foundations, and should not be expected to eliminate all potential sources of water entering a crawlspace. An adequate grade to a low point outlet drain in the crawlspace is required by code. 4110 Seismic Design Structures should be designed to resist earthquake loading in accordance with the methodology described in the 2010 ASCE-7 Standard. We recommend Site Class D be used for design. Design values determined for the site using the USGS (United States Geological Survey) U.S. Seismic Design Maps tool (Version 3.1.0) are summarized on Table 3. Table 3. Recommended Earthquake Ground Motion Parameters (2010 ASCE-7) Parameter Value Location (Lat, Long), degrees 45.447, -122.747 Mapped Spectral Acceleration Values (MCE, Site Class D): Peak Ground Acceleration 0.431 Short Period, SS 0.988 g 1.0 Sec Period, S1 0.426 g Soil Factors for Site Class D: Fa 1.105 Fv 1.574 Residential Site Value = 2/3 x Fa x SS 0.728 g Residential Seismic Desi] n Category D, 3757-Oak Street Estates No. 2 GR 10 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon wherein saturated soil deposits temporarily lose strength and • behave as a liquid in response to earthquake shaking. Soil liquefaction is generally limited to loose, granular soils located below the water table. Following development, on-site soils will consist predominantly of engineered fill or native fine-grained soils, which are not considered susceptible to liquefaction. Therefore, it is our opinion that special design or construction measures are not required to mitigate the effects of liquefaction. • • 3757-Oak Street Estates No. 2 GR 1 1 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 UNCERTAINTIES AND LIMITATIONS • We have prepared this report for the owner and their consultants for use in design of this project only. This report should be provided in its entirety to prospective contractors for bidding and estimating purposes; however, the conclusions and interpretations presented in this report should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Experience has shown that soil and groundwater conditions can vary significantly over small distances. Inconsistent conditions can occur between explorations that may not be detected by a geotechnical study. If, during future site operations, subsurface conditions are encountered which vary appreciably from those described herein, GeoPacific should be notified for review of the recommendations of this report, and revision of such if necessary. Sufficient geotechnical monitoring, testing and consultation should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by explorations. The checklist attached to this report outlines recommended geotechnical observations and testing for the project. Recommendations for design changes will be provided should conditions revealed during construction differ from those anticipated, and to verify that the geotechnical aspects of construction comply with the contract plans and specifications. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, GeoPacific attempted to execute these services in accordance with generally accepted professional principles and practices in the fields of geotechnical engineering and engineering geology at the time the report was prepared. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The scope of our work did not include environmental assessments or evaluations regarding the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous or toxic substances in the soil, surface water, or groundwater at this site. • We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Sincerely, GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. ����Q PR(JFFSs/ 5 INF& cr 474 r 4.... Cb04,41(k1---- OREGON / v�gN 23 \° � gMFS D.1M* EXPIRES:06/30/2012 Beth K. Rapp, R.G., C.E.G. James D. Imbrie, P.E., G.E. Senior Engineering Geologist Principal Geotechnical Engineer Attachments: References Checklist of Recommended Geotechnical Testing and Observation Figure 1 —Vicinity Map Figure 2 —Site and Exploration Plan 41, Test Pit Logs (TP-1 —TP-5) 3757-Oak Street Estates No.2 GR 12 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 REFERENCES 41) Atwater, B.F., 1992, Geologic evidence for earthquakes duringthepast 2 000years alongthe Co alis 9 q Cop alis southern coastal Washington: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 97, p. 1901-1919. Beeson, M.H., Tolan, T.L., and Madin, I.P., 1989, Geologic map of the Lake Oswego Quadrangle, Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington Counties, Oregon: Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Geological Map Series GMS-59, scale 1:24,000. Carver, G.A., 1992, Late Cenozoic tectonics of coastal northern California: American Association of Petroleum Geologists-SEPM Field Trip Guidebook, May, 1992. Geomatrix Consultants, 1995, Seismic Design Mapping, State of Oregon: unpublished report prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation, Personal Services Contract 11688, January 1995. Goldfinger, C., KuIm, L.D., Yeats, R.S., Appelgate, B, MacKay, M.E., and Cochrane, G.R., 1996, Active strike-slip faulting and folding of the Cascadia Subduction-Zone plate boundary and forearc in central and northern Oregon: in Assessing earthquake hazards and reducing risk in the Pacific Northwest, v. 1: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1560, P. 223-256. Madin, I.P., 1990, Earthquake hazard geology maps of the Portland metropolitan area, Oregon: Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report 0-90-2, scale 1:24,000, 22 p. Madin, I.P. and Mabey, M.A., 1996, Earthquake Hazard Maps for Oregon, Oregon: Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries GMS-100. • Peterson, C.D., Darioenzo, M.E., Burns, S.F., and Burris, W.K., 1993, Field trip guide to Cascadia paleoseismic evidence along the northern California coast: evidence of subduction zone seismicity in the central Cascadia margin: Oregon Geology, v. 55, p. 99-144. United States Geologic Survey, 2015, U.S. Seismic Design Maps Online Tool, http://earthquake.uses.qov/designmaps/us/application.php Unruh, J.R., Wong, I.G., Bott, J.D., Silva, W.J., and Lettis, W.R., 1994, Seismotectonic evaluation: Scoggins Dam, Tualatin Project, Northwest Oregon: unpublished report by William Lettis and Associates and Woodward Clyde Federal Services, Oakland, CA, for U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver CO (in Geomatrix Consultants, 1995). Werner, K.S., Nabelek, J., Yeats, R.S., Malone, S., 1992, The Mount Angel fault: implications of seismic- reflection data and the Woodburn, Oregon, earthquake sequence of August, 1990: Oregon Geology, v. 54, p. 112-117. Wong, I. Silva, W., Bott, J., Wright, D., Thomas, P., Gregor, N., Li., S., Mabey, M., Sojourner, A., and Wang, Y., 2000, Earthquake Scenario and Probabilistic Ground Shaking Maps for the Portland, Oregon, Metropolitan Area; State of Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries; Interpretative Map Series IMS-15. Yeats, R.S., Graven, E.P., Werner, K.S., Goldfinger, C., and Popowski, T., 1996, Tectonics of the Willamette Valley, Oregon: in Assessing earthquake hazards and reducing risk in the Pacific Northwest, v. 1: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1560, P. 183-222, 5 plates, scale 1:100,000. Yelin, T.S., 1992, An earthquake swarm in the north Portland Hills (Oregon): More speculations on the 111 seismotectonics of the Portland Basin: Geological Society of America, Programs with Abstracts, v. 24, no. 5, p. 92. 3757-Oak Street Estates No. 2 GR 13 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 • CHECKLIST OF RECOMMENDED GEOTECHNICAL TESTING AND OBSERVATION Item 1Procedure Timing By Whom Done No. Prior to beginning Contractor, Developer, 1 Preconstruction meeting site work Civil and Geotechnical Engineers 2 Fill removal from site or Prior to mass Soil Technician/ sorting and stockpiling stripping Geotechnical Engineer 3 Stripping, aeration, and During stripping Soil Technician root-picking operations Compaction testing of 4 engineered fill (90% of During filling, tested Soil Technician Modified Proctor) every 2 vertical feet Compaction testing of During backfilling, 5 trench backfill (95% of tested every 4 Soil Technician Standard Proctor) vertical feet for every 200 lineal feet Street Subgrade Prior to placing base • 6 Compaction (95% of Soil Technician Standard Proctor) course Base course compaction Prior to paving, 7 (95% of Modified Proctor) tested every 200 Soil Technician lineal feet /A C Compaction ° During paving, tested 8 (92 o (bottom lift)/ 92% Soil Technician (top lift) of Rice) every 200 lineal feet 9 Final Geotechnical Completion of project Geotechnical Engineer Engineer's Report • • 3757-Oak Street Estates No. 2 GR 14 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. ........./11(\ e•• ---,t, 14835 SW 72nd Avenue GeoP CaiC Portland, Oregon 97224 VICINITY MAP Engineering Inc. Tel: (503) 598-8445 Fax: (503)941-9281 • sfr ._ r ...,rr; r r • • • �r '(• S - r L• • • •:Ili Y� 1' i[)5 !' Al' !,-ti�- .,1 h •••t or.-„ r•••� __ • / .y. FW '.i N4(1Rtl I(icy. ..RD• ., I. 4nn4. syy ' •. •f ••.rw.'rrrrir. • • t Itz ..s.�•,. .° ( Vi .N ..'`, , •• •r ""�arfr.••,•' 111 ' •• 2 : : �,% '1. "' �'[e I Z''Ort Ian41 '!i 8% 1 Y t • . 'l !, iii ! `,, 4' = . g}•`��iyy.pp •�. 7p '" SUBJECT SITE • • , 'i . rt ' :�.i'tQa•. �) -•.: �Jo 1 Z ..i _ , 1l:u Ahrw. ' r c • t,'• '"Dragk • • • • { `I >i ! J : • , — �u•. i!: y •11-',Z!8irt I I• • c. R.Y. .- • Uri rand L': ..0 4 • `s, ' % ' s r; �A _ Vark . rY 11"0.: • • •• \A t.•1gm, .: t �p •�, • , • j_ Qti • d;N• 4. Iw ; • 'ieetn( . •• :� R . 17 t..• •a• f I an, m 0 iti T1•��n" .``•• ,.. ;7i:c t (1, :: rrp r .l % I p.; ( �S JN. M �S'ytvd .� I .._'• • ';:m••.:°... 1�• !•' �� }z •F I' :�: dFAF 1-• •1 C It ' _iii. ;� 1 • i" l �.7 ...11".. 1,•"t. ..;. 4, ,la*It tl •• h. '4., e'4' '!(I `. F•. -7 .` , M 1.1.1.N U 1t A H (•'E J • k ,v4s„%• . .H \ i h• • • ••• 7 0 0A \ �� ' r . wi.• 1. I s i ce$kik) •\'‘ ''•• ..” .• 1• v--• . • ji I-2 'r. `t'�� Ti. , wr, 4. I. {`y rte. n 1 ;:a , ; ' e t ,4 yo , I 0. �}t . ; ..r,- \ s �•:.; �� ,.. NORTH '13., \, •til. . \ ` ••h•11 if A q • 1 ell t slAlip . `fj • .,. 1-,,-.. _?:;-•1 ¢•.'1 __ _•, - -L:•_ - ~-_ .'t. r Date: 6/2/2015 Legend Approximate Scale 1 in=2,000 ft Drawn by: EKR • Base maps: U.S.Geological Survey 7.5 minute Topographic Map Series, Beaverton,Oregon Quadrangle, 1961 (Photorevised 1984) and Lake Oswego,Oregon Quadrangle 1961 (Photorevised 1985). Project: Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project NOV 15-3757 FIGURE 1 Tigard, Oregon 14835 SW 72nd Avenue SITE PLAN AND GeoP4 Portland,Oregon 97224 Engineering.Inc. Tel: (503)598-8445 Fax:_ ___s____ _ .. _______(503)941-9281 EXPLORATION LOCATIONS 411 _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _ _ _ _ . -_, . \ 1_ 1. \ \ l 1 t L L. 1. \}, / / / / / / / / / / / ,' SW VENTURA DRIVE - (-_t tiL(� ( it ( - 1--I 1 ‘ . ` 1 \ \ =� --- ` ) '_ .., 4t ,.: :;J. -- - _ \ + \\ 11‘2((:--;(_1/(z(--/-: 1-7 BUILDING SETBACK . t��A.,k ISI ' ,- V. , ; ark ,, ,-- pj r.. \���t •_ h*'7)TP-4 44 ' . . .,y L 61, 4-7. -44,kt-v, li -7�i- - -- -4/%/ I �`' 1lc ,!, _ TP-5 ��n It -- )1,/,...-fitpe- . -: /r ,•i t. - 7 - -t ;' //, 1A i . - - / / / / i / / i" ID .. T _ I: i " f / it ' n � ! 1 // / . 7 _ ___,i, z _ "w _..o ar _ ,y6. , 9'7 '_., " , TP-2 - - _ SW LOCUST / I __ / STREET —' 2_,_ -7 -7, E!r w l > �i- I _ TP-1 . ' 2I e.. - !.aza T 31 F NI i 3 N k i mss_ -- Il .z36r :__ _,„3,6 _ l I I North I____? 1 i Legend Date:6/2/2015 0 80' Drawn by: EKR III TP-1 Si Test Pit Designation and Approximate Location APPROXIMATE SCALE 1"=80' Project: Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 FIGURE 2 Tigard, Oregon 14835 SW 72nd Avenue GeoPe Portland, Oregon 97224 TEST PIT LOG 6tglnaennp.Inc Tel: (503)598-8445 Fax: (503)941-9281 • Project: Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 Test Pit No. TP-1 Tigard, Oregon N^ ; ,n IDN Y `S e O • U O z ,� (n d N C Of o a E � 112 Material Description a in o v m Moderately organic SILT (OL-ML), dark brown, loose, trace roots throughout, moist(Topsoil Horizon) 1 — 1.5 2— 1.0 3— 2.5 Medium stiff to very stiff, SILT (ML), trace clay, light brown, micaceous, trace black staining, strong orange and gray mottling, moist(Loess) 4— 3.0 5_ Transitions to SILT(ML)with fine grained sand below 5 feet. • 6 7 8 -- 9 10— Test Pit Terminated at 9.5 Feet. Note: No seepage or groundwater encountered. 11 — 12 • LEGEND Date Excavated: 4/6/2015 S Gass\I 100 to Logged By: B. Rapp Surface Elevation: Bag Sample Bucket Sample Shelby Tube Sample Seepage Water Bearing Zone Water Level at Abandonment GeoPlr14835 SW 72nd Avenue fle Portland,Oregon 97224 TEST PIT LOG Engineering,Inc Tel: (503) 598-8445 Fax: (503)941-9281 • Project: Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 Test Pit No. TP-2 Tigard, Oregon d" Y N -- d- o a` r' w " C — Material Description a. to m Moderately organic SILT(OL-ML), dark brown, loose, trace roots throughout, moist(Topsoil Horizon) 1 - 2.5 2 2.0 Stiff to very stiff, SILT (ML), trace clay, light brown, micaceous, trace black staining, strong orange and gray mottling, moist(Loess) 3 2.5 4 2.5 5 Transitions to SILT (ML)with fine grained sand below 5 feet. • 6- 7- 8 - 9 Test Pit Terminated at 9 Feet. 10 Note: No seepage or groundwater encountered. 11 12— • LEGEND o Date Excavated: 4/6/2015 loot. Bud Logged By: B. Rapp 000. Surface Elevation: Bag Sample Bucket Sample Shelby Tube Sample Seepage Water Bearing Zone Water Level at Abandonment 14835 SW 72nd Avenue coop Portland, Oregon 97224 TEST PIT LOG Engineering.Inc Tel: (503) 598-8445 Fax: (503)941-9281 • Project: Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 Test Pit No. TP-3 Tigard, Oregon 15 arm T s20 0 Material Description l cn U m 1 — 1.0 Medium stiff to stiff, clayey SILT (ML), trace gravel, light brown to gray, subtle 2- 1.5 orange and gray mottling, trace roots, thin topsoil developed at surface, moist (Fill) 3- 2.0 4- 2.0 5- 6 - Stiff -6 - Stiff to very stiff, clayey SILT (ML), with gray basalt fragments, light brown, strong orange and gray mottling, moist (Residual Soil) 7 8 9 10- - Test Pit Terminated at 10 Feet. 11 - Note: No seepage or groundwater encountered. 12 • LEGEND .tom. Date Excavated: 4/6/2015 S Gal 100 - Logged By: B. Rapp y 000 a Surface Elevation: Bag Sample Bucket Sample Shelby Tube Sample Seepage Water Beanng Zone Water Level at Abandonment 14835 SW 72nd Avenue GeoP mu Portland, Oregon 97224 TEST PIT LOG Engineering,Inc. Tel: (503)598-8445 Fax: (503)941-9281 • Project: Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 Test Pit No. TP-4 Tigard, Oregon _ $ d.-. •43,(4lV p O ado a ��- .o c > m p Material Description a � Cl) - �v � g m 0 U Moderately organic SILT (OL-ML), dark brown, loose, trace roots throughout, moist(Topsoil Horizon) 1 - 0.5 2- 1.5 Stiff to very stiff, clayey SILT(ML)to silty CLAY (CL), with gray basalt fragments 3 2.5 below 5 feet, light brown, subtle orange and gray mottling, trace roots to 5 feet, moist (Residual Soil) 4 - 3.0 5 • 6 - 7 8- 9 Test Pit Terminated at 9 Feet. 10 Note: No seepage or groundwater encountered. 11 -- 12 _ LEGEND Date Excavated: 4/6/2015 100 `to ;ucket Logged By: B. Rapp 1,000 g 1/2 Surface Elevation: Bag Sample Bucket Sample Shelby Tube Sample Seepage Water Bearing Zone Water Level at Abandonment GeoPIr14835 SW 72nd Avenue Portland, Oregon 97224 TEST PIT LOG Engineering.Inc. Tel: (503)598-8445 Fax: (503)941-9281 Project: Oak Street Estates No. 2 Project No. 15-3757 Test Pit No. TP-5 Tigard, Oregon 8 Et -- e ?"v-- p 3 2 o v TA pCa p Material Description Q d22a) E �� �o (.1 Cr)CL 0 U CO Highly organic SILT(OL-ML), dark brown, loose, trace roots throughout, moist(Topsoil Horizon) 1 2 Soft (R2), weathered BASALT, trace light brown silty clay to clayey silt matrix, light gray, black staining, moist(Boring Lava Formation) 3 - 4 Practical Refusal on Medium Hard (R3) Basalt at 3.5 Feet. 5— Note: No seepage or groundwater encountered. • 6- 7- 8 9- 10- 11 12 LEGEND o Date Excavated: 4/6/2015 ,00 to •uckm ® Logged By: B. Rapp 000. Surface Elevation: Bag Sample Bucket Sample Shelby Tube Sample Seepage Water Bearing Zone Water Level at Abandonment