Loading...
08/12/2015 - Packet m Completeness Review for Boards, Commissions and Committee Records CITY OF TIGARD CCAC - City Center Advisory Commission Name of Board, Commission or Committee August 12, 2015 Date of Meeting I have verified these documents are a complete copy of the official record. Joe Patton,Meeting Secretary Print Name aorq gnature October 15, 2015 Date City of Tigard City Center Advisory Commission Agenda MEETING DATE/TIME: August 12, 2015 — 6:30 to 8:15 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: Red Rock Creek Conference Room, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER Carine 6:30 Welcome and Introductions 2. CONSIDER MINUTES Carine 6:35 3. NON-AGENDA ITEMS/PUBLIC COMMENT Carine 6:40 4. TACTICAL URBANISM DISCUSSION Joyce 6:45 5. 2016-20 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Sean 7:05 (DOWNTOWN PROJECTS) 6. SAXONY SITE UPDATE Sean 7:15 7. CCAC COMMUNICATION GOALS Carine 7:30 8. DOWNTOWN PARKING Sean 7:45 9. FOLLOW-UP : VIEW FROM 99W Carine 8:00 10. LIAISON REPORTS All 8:05 11. ADJOURNMENT Carine 8:15 *EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Center Advisory Commission may go into Executive Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660(2) (e).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision.Executive Sessions are closed to the public. Upcoming meetings of note. Tuesday,August 18,6:30 p.m. Council/CCDA Meeting-Tigard Street Trail and Saxony Site Future Tuesday,September 1,6:30 p.m.,CCDA Meeting,City Hall Wednesday,September 9,6:30 p.m.,Regular CCAC Meeting,Red Rock Creek Conference Room Tuesday,October 6,6:30 p.m.,CCDA Meeting,CCAC joint meeting,City Hall Wednesday,October 14,630 p.m.,Regular CCAC Meeting,Red Rock Creek Conference Room CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA—August 12, 2015 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 1 CITY OF TIGARD CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION Meeting Minutes August 12, 2015 Members Present: Carine Arendes (Chair),Deanie Bush,Joyce Casey,Lynn Scroggin, and Richard Shavey Members Absent: Laura Fisher,Linh Pao (Vice Chair), Paul Miller, Sherrie Devaney and Ravi Nagaraj (alternate) Staff Present: Downtown Redevelopment Project Manager Sean Farrelly; and Senior Administrative Specialist Joe Patton Others Present: Councilor Marland Henderson 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Arendes called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. The meeting was held in the Tigard Red Rock Conference Room, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Joe recorded the roll call. 2. CONSIDER MINUTES The July 8, 2015 CCAC Minutes were approved. 3. NON-AGENDA ITEMS/PUBLIC COMMENT A. The planning for the Street Fair on September 12 is underway with meetings held on Thursdays in the US Bank conference room at 5:45 pm starting August 20. The chalk walk event starts at 9 am and the TYAC is working on prizes for the top ten. There will also be a walk and Tour de Parks events. B. The Tigard Street Trail meeting is August 18 with Council/CCDA. Chair Arendes called for public comment. There was none. 4. TACTICAL URBANISM DISCUSSION Councilor Henderson noted that since most of the Urban Renewal Funds are already allocated,it is important to look outside the box to complete other projects.Joyce asked what the concept meant to CCAC, how it applies to downtown, and what the role of the CCAC is. It was noted that the Mobius art by Symposium Coffee was an example of a small scale action serving a larger purpose. After discussion it was decided to invite Suenn Ho to facilitate a meeting to discuss ideas on activating the Tigard Street Trail with potential partners/stakeholders at the October or November meeting. At the September meeting a list of invitees, such as neighborhood groups, dog park advocates,TDA, PRAB, and property owners along the trail. 5. 2016-20 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (DOWNTOWN PROJECTS) Sean gave a brief overview of downtown related CIP projects including potential funding for each. 6. SAXONY SITE UPDATE Suenn will be presenting to Council potential uses for the recently purchased Saxony property. She will be meeting with representatives from FEMA and Clean Water Services to discuss issues that Page 1 of 2 CITY CEN'T'ER ADVISORY COMMISSION August 12,2015 exist. Once a determination is made where building can take place then work can begin on a design. There is likely to be. some public space as well. Richard attended a meeting that included potential development partners. Involving there from the start increases the possibilities of it being developed and the team seems inspired by its constraints_ 7. CCAC COMMUNICATION GOALS Rudy Owens,Tigard's Communications Strategist, will be invited to the meeting next month to discuss what goals to focus on and how to communicate them,determining whom the audience should be. Lloyd Purdy might be of assistance as well. It is important to manage expectations while celebrate successes and communicating excitement about future projects. The methodology (electronic, printed,in person,etc) is open. The audience can include downtown users, shoppers, restaurant customers,voters, dog park users, CERT', and neighborhood networks. A brochure design is underway to communicate past,present and future projects. The target audience is current and prospective property and business owners,developers, and the general public. It will.be .ready in time for the Street Fair.A newly designed cite center urban renewal plan,in color and with pictures, will be ready for review at the next meeting. 8. DOWNTOWN PARKING Sean reviewed the results of the downtown parking study. The results looked at off street and on street parking.The results show areas of high use south of the railroad at noontime for a short period. The parking supply overall appears adequate but will be regularly monitored for changes. Once the Burnham Street apartments are built, the parking Breit will be changed to two hours during the dale to allow for business visitor parking. The results aril] be shared with the TDA parking subgroup. 9. FOLLOW-UP VIEW FROM 99W Carine distributed the document she will present to CCDA. It contains the same information as the Google document (with a new introductory) organized in a more formal format. 10. LIAISON REPORTS A. Linli emailed her notes on the July PFAB meeting. B. The ballet measure for the Tigard Community and Recreation Center was finalized and it does not specifically state siting it in the downtown area, so at this point there is not a role for the CCAC to play. It is moving forward without being specific to leave options open. 11. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 pm. CLCJo Patton, CCAC ]Meeting Secretary ATTEST: Carine Arendes, Chair Page 2 of 2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) establishes Tigard's annual budget for capital improvements to its public facility system and plans the following five years to make a 6-year plan. The city allocates funding for its major construction activities in six defined capital improvement categories such as Gen- eral Capital Facilities, Streets,Water,Parks, Stormwater, and Sanitary Sewer. A CIP project is any project that improves or adds value to the city's infrastructure, costs $50,000 or more, and has a useful life or extends the useful life of infrastructure for 5 years or more. Public facili- ties addressed by the CIP are roads,parks, sanitary sewer, storm drainage,water quality management, domestic water,public buildings, and operations facilities. For the FY 2016 CIP, the city process was revised based on input from Budget Committee and City Council. This process resulted in the genera- tion of a six-year CIP project list that is initially reviewed by council. After submission to council, the CIP list is submitted to citizen members such as the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee JTAC), the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC), and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (DRAB) for prioritization. Adopted Master Plans,Area Plans, and the Strategic Plan along with estab- lished prioritization lists are matched to available funding to identify projects to be budgeted in the cur- rent and later years. In addition, staff capacity is considered when building the CIP. Total cost for the FY 2016-20 CIP is estimated to be $100 million over the next six years. Spending for the city's CIP in FY 2016 is $38.9 million across all capital funds. Below are key projects budgeted for FY 2015-16: General Capital Facilities • Final phase of the replacement of exterior wall materials at City Hall/Police buildings Parks • Phase 1 development of Dirksen Nature Park • Implementation of the intergovernmental agreement between the City of Tigard and Tigard -Tualatin School District to provide field improvements on school property, • Construction of the remaining segments of the Fanno Creek Trail Connection project that is funded by Regional Flexible Funds Active Transportation and Complete Streets grant (RFFA) and, • Continued purchase of open spaces using proceeds obtained from the city's $17 million parks bond approved in FY 2010. Sewer • Replacement of the East Tigard Sanitary Sewer and, • Development of a sanitary sewer line in conjunction with the street project on Walnut Street. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 259 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Stormwater • Reconstruction of the storm facility at Greenfield Drive near Pine View • Upgrade of the storm line at 106`' Avenue to Pacific Highway and, • Development of a stormwater master plan. Streets • Major street improvements including Walnut Street and Pacific Highway/Gaarde Street/McDonald Street and, • Continued slurry seals, crack seals, and overlays via the Pavement Management Program. Water • Continuation of the projects associated with the Tigard/Lake Oswego Partnership • New Water Source System-wide Improvements and, • 550 Zone Connection to Price Reservoir. Below is a table summarizing the FY 2015-16 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The table breaks down the CIP by system. The second column provides the budget for that system. The third column includes the system infrastructure budget. The system infrastructure budget accounts for staff time related to private development projects. The fourth column represents other CIP related expenses including fund level charges resulting from the city's federally approved indirect cost model. The last column shows the total FY 2016 Adopted Budget for the Capital Improvement Program which is $38,943,180. Capital Other CIP Improvement System Related System Budget Infrastructure Expenses Total General Capital Facilities 11306,100 - 150,000 1,456,100 Parks 3,131,242 20,319 6,800 3,158,361 Streets 23701,404 202,044 6,800 2,910,248 Water 29,119,524 49,158 - 29,168,682 Sanitary Sewer 938,582 46,111 - 984,693 Stormwater 1,218,985 46,111 - 1,265,096 Total $ 38,415,837 $ 363,743 $ 163,600 $38,943,180 The following pages provide a discussion of the CIP on annual operating costs followed by detailed information on all projects by system. This included a discussion of the CIP prioritization process, followed by a complete list of all the projects considered in the FY 2016-20 capital improvement plan. This list includes projects in prioritized order by system, funding status, and summary financial information. This list is re-prioritized annually along with new projects submitted by staff as well as citizen committee members. PAGE 260 - CITY OF TIGARD IMPACT OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ON OPERATING COSTS Capital projects can impact the future operating and maintenance costs of the city. In some instances, such as the construction of a new facility, operating costs will increase. In other instances, such as re- placement of old and defective water meters, operating costs may decrease. As the city makes deci- sions about which capital projects to implement, it must also evaluate the impact these projects will have on future operating costs and determine if the city will be able to afford those costs in future years. By approving the CIP projects, the city is making a commitment to adequately fund those future operating costs. The following discussion summarizes the anticipated major operating cost within each capital improve- ment system: General Facilities Capital Projects System Program The General Facilities Capital Projects System Program's FY 2015-16 CIP includes required repairs of city facilities. These projects will have very minimal impact on future operating costs as it will not re- quire additional staffing or materials. 600,000 -' 500,000 µ 400,000 300,000 ~ 200,000 100,000 1 Parks System Program The FY 2015-16 Parks System CIP includes projects that will have a direct impact on the city's operat- ing costs. The very nature of a park system requires ongoing maintenance costs both for new additions to a system as well as maturing parks or trails. Significant projects listed include land acquisitions and development resulting from the $17 million dollar parks bond that was approved by voters in Novem- ber 2010. A total of$1.6 million dollars has been programmed for both park land acquisition and de- velopment as recommended by the city's Parks &Recreation Advisory Board (DRAB). Of the $1.6 mil- lion dollars, a total of$770,000 has been set aside for acquisition and development for potential sites located within the downtown area. As a result of the bond, over 452 acres of land has been preserved and is expected to require maintenance in the coming years. The City of Tigard will conduct a study within the next fiscal year to determine an appropriate park utility rate to address the cost of mainte- nance of parks and greenways within city boundaries. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 261 IMPACT OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ON OPERATING COSTS 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 ^i ry'b �k' Sanitary Sewer Program Many of the projects in the Sanitary Sewer Program, such as the Major Maintenance and line replace- ment programs such as East Tigard Sewer, address existing and potential maintenance problems and thereby serve to reduce and prevent future operating cost impacts. Although additional sewer lines increase operating costs somewhat, these costs are offset by the additional revenues received by new sewer customers. No new positions related to the Sanitary Sewer program are anticipated in the com- ing years. 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 Street System Program The operating cost impact of the Streets Program is minimal and no new positions are forecast in fu- ture years. The Pavement Management Program (PMP) provides corrective and preventative mainte- nance on city streets including right-of-way maintenance. The program restores the wearing course of the streets and thereby improves the pavement's integrity,improves ride ability, and enhances traffic safety. By performing these upgrades and improvements to the city's streets on a regular schedule, the city is able to reduce future operating costs. The FY 2015-16 UP budget does contain two major street improvements that are partially funded through grants. These include Walnut Street (116f Avenue to Tiedeman Avenue and 135thAvenue), and Pacific Highway/McDonald Street/Gaarde Street Intersection projects. streets. PAGE 262- CITY OF TIGARD IMPACT OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ON OPERATING COSTS 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 f Storm Water Program The projects within the Storm Water Program are designed to address erosion and storm drainage problems and to return wetland areas to a more natural, native state. Typically, these projects have a tendency to show a positive impact on future operating costs with improved standards addressing storm drainage issues. However, in this budget, no new positions are forecasted in the coming years related to this program. 600,000 _r t 500,000 400,000 ` 300,000 ! 200,000 100,000 f ! 1. f S Water System Program A variety of projects are planned for the Water System program in FY 2015-16. A number of these projects,including the Water Main Line Oversizing projects consist of the maintenance or replacement of existing infrastructure. By maintaining the existing system, the city avoids higher future costs than if the system were allowed to deteriorate. While difficult to calculate, it is safe to say that these projects create savings in future operating costs. The FY 2015-16 CIP shows the city's continued commitment to infrastructure needs resulting from the annexation of River Terrace. These projects include the de- sign of the Cach Reservoir and Pump Station as well as the 550 Zone Connection to Price Reservoir in the out years of the program. The FY 2015-16 CIP also sees the continuation of the Lake Oswego Partnership. This project will provide Tigard with a long term water supply with delivery scheduled for 2016. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 263 IMPACT OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ON OPERATING COSTS The project will include a raw water intake facility on the Clackamas River, increased piping size, in- creased water treatment plant capacity, and other capacity increases. Beginning in FY 2017, the full impact of this project on future operating cost for the City of Tigard is expected to be$2 million annu- ally. 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 �- 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 LAKE OSWEGO TIGARD qe)ateff - .. lap rqp 1W PAGE 264- CITY OF TIGARD PRIORITIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CIP Development of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) started almost as soon as the prior CIP was adopted. The list of potential projects to be considered started with funded and unfunded projects in the prior CIP. In addition, staff reviewed master plans, area plans, and the strategic plan to complete the capital needs assessment for the city. Since many of the projects in the prior CIP are underway, those projects are assumed to continue to move forward and do not need to be prioritized. All of the remaining projects make up the list for prioritization. The prioritization process is intended to state what is most important to Tigard regard- less of cost. The process requires staff to present a prioritized list to council along with citizen boards and committees for comment during a two week period. For the FY 2016 six-year CIP, the city's prioritization process was revised with input from Budget Committee and City Council. Through this process, it was determined that council would receive the final list of all projects recommended for prioritization prior to citizen boards and committees. This would allow council members to review the list and make any revisions they deem necessary. Typically, council and citizen boards would focus their efforts solely on ranking transportation and parks pro- jects. However, separate criterion was developed for each system in an effort to incorporate various aspects of the city's strategic plan. As a result, the list of identified transportation needs outweighed available resources. Therefore, the city will focus on completing those transportation projects that are in the current CIP with the intent of revising the prioritization process for the Street System during the next fiscal year. Other projects such as water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater are development driven and are prioritized based on health and life safety criteria which is conducted by city staff. The citizen committees are presented with a prioritized list capital projects recommended by staff and are allowed to comment on the suggested list. The criterion used by city staff to prioritize projects in- cludes such aspects as public health and safety, environmental impact, system reliability, and imple- mentation of a master plan. Input for project prioritization is then provided by the Tigard Transporta- tion Advisory Committee (TTAC), the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC), and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB). TTAC is responsible for commenting on all transportation pro- jects. PRAB reviews all parks projects, and CCAC provides input on those parks and transportation projects related to the downtown. Lastly, the final prioritized project list is reviewed and vetted by the Budget Committee. Prioritization is important as an expression of Tigard's needs. It differs from budgeting in that it is blind of available resources. It is common for high priority projects to go unfunded due to their cost and available resources. The priority of unfunded projects remains important for the city when dis- cussing these projects with our regional partners. This has allowed Tigard to partner with agencies such as Washington County, Oregon Department of Transportation, and Metro. When combining the available resources of Tigard and our partners, the city is able to address high priority infrastructure needs that could not be funded on its own. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 265 PRIORITIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CIP The timeline for CIP development and prioritization is as follows: • July - Staff conducts a capital needs assessment across all systems from master plans, area plans, and the strategic plan. • August–Staff prioritizes new projects. • Mid September–Recommended project list reviewed by City Council. • September 23 until October 6—Project list review/suggestion period by citizen boards and committees. • Late October–City Council review of CIP list with citizen comments. • November thru January—CIP projects costs are determined. • Mid January—CIP is submitted to City Manager as part of the proposed budget. • Mid April—Proposed CIP is considered by the Budget Committee in public meetings. • First Council Meeting in June—City Council adoption of Capital Improvement Plan. How To Read The Prioritization Table: All projects are organized by system: Streets, Water, Parks, Stormwater, and Sanitary Sewer. The table lists each project including priority, name, funding status, funding source, and project total. Projects with a priority of"Current"are projects that are in progress during the prior fiscal year (FY 2015) indicating it is already a high priority. Projects with a priority of "Staff' are those that were submitted by staff after the prioritization process was completed but need- ed to be considered for the CIP. Projects that have a numerical priority"1, 2, 3..."were recommended by staff and then reviewed by citizen boards and committees and are lightly shaded. These projects are fully funded in the six-year CIP. Projects that have dark shading are considered unfunded. Those pro- jects that have a "Current" status and have dark shading are those projects that were funded in the CIP during the previous year. However, they became unfunded in FY 2016 due to a lack of available re- sources including staff capacity as well as funding. MFdwh­ s aaaeet fmpravements fl 16th Ave.to Tledemaa Ave.y along with Gas Tax,Water,Underground Utdrty, eet/335th Ave.Jnreneetha fmprowement fn progress.warded$7 mfloi—great rhru m'r. Sanitary Sewer,8 Stormwarer&Cydht C.­&A,_ fn progress Gas Tox $ 682,DM fn PfOgress orrw Jy Funded:owardtd9.4 m!!an Tronsporroma eve opraenr ax Pacf/r Nwy/Gaarde Sf.fMclTonafd 5t.rmpravemrnt grantrhMERP,000T,URA&Waco Traffic lmpoff Fee S 1,765,WD ON Gas rox, ranspar v wn Devclapmenr To'.rroffk frnpoa Fee ant 72nd Ave./Dartmouth SL lnre,.e O-0-p--9 fa Progress. A tlndergroand UrlFry $ 2,670,4DO Cvfrenr 926d Ave.Sidewalk(Waverly 1),ra Cook part) fn Pragre" ax, tommworer $ 579,Wc Current Redemaa Avenge Shtewolk thgord'Street to Greenbwq Rood) m progress Gas Tax,&5rormwoeer _S 7651wp Cwrent Tword Transpartosran SDC fn Progress S 5I,OW rogress ms mn r m era C­ f Upper 9oortn Ferry Rood/Durham Road Adoptive S+gnol Coordwao" Transpamfotfan Program grans Trnnspartatman Develapmenr Tan S 165,009 .Mole.Sr./Green Sr.Re"P;-Phase I fn Progress-S3.4 mfl;*n rn M)7P and MSTIP funding Gas Tox,&Water S 1,665,063 s ax,Water,samtory 5ew ,al r Mafn St./Green Sr.fmprowemenu-Phose 1 in Pragress•SI.1 m+Jlfon In MRP fandfnq Starmwater S 1.190.576 PAGE 266 - CITY OF TIGARD PRIORITIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CIP LANE PRQIFCTS CITV'k>asUM ranspa F 5 M-n He I11WDonard Inter-11—Improyemenh Loft-Tum lane;Right-Turn onto Development Tax,Sanitary Sewer, 1 westbound MCDo need;F.tend left-roan lane north bound McDonald St.) Parriy'I Storr.,water,Watt, $ g,9Dq,Ogq 2 Tiedeman/Greeriburg Rd./N,Dakota IoW*lq_ppkpn..1 Unfunded Transportaalan D=opment Tax $ 6,930,000 72nd Ayenue lmflrovements lDanmoutil$Lte Pac tH- Unfunded r, spurt+t��n Ve—pment lar S PIA'00,000 4 Tiedeman/N.Ddliote/Tlgard It.latatsectlan R� Unfunded Cas Tau S 80,T80,000 S Wefiaut 5ueat edgman Aye.to Pa Cile Hwy" unfunded Gas Ta. i 9,150,000 Gas T ex.5 omit Dry Sewer,tato r mwater, 6 1121tt Avenue(Walnur m Gaardel&Computef A' St.) unfunded W.iter $ 7 _ N,Dakota SL6dWge Replacemenr Untundea Unkn9Wn y 8 _ Wjffl Street•Hunrlker to Tech Center Drive Unfunded Unknown S Ash Avenue De sign Ap plication IR.4—d Gassing) Fully funded Irons por tatwn Dere la pment lex T,;ffic trnpau For to M.a�n Street Bridge Palrating/RehablRtati— .Unfunded Storrawater $ _SAAAU-PRD1 ECTS $ 2 Cammcrc err<trcetExtenstan(Lincoln as 95thp-Ph-2 Unfunded Gas erg 5 2=000 2 Ha11 BQ-S-Wewa Iks MonRa Rd.to Durham Rd.) Unfunded a..:Tata $ 1,195;000 3 Cara,*er sv'It pec Sidewalk&Star-Uetvr r ur rss l.ty IM4"1 t:L1 0n) Fu=ly t undu dPend;r=g tri MCS Frrdrng at Sq30 rel 010 Gas Tax,Star—ter $ T,155.0W A Hag Blvd/Pfaffre St-New Treffle Signal Unfunded Gas Tax $ 1,0Z400D 4 Murdock St-Skreivalk(103rd to Templeton School) Unfunded Gas Tax 503.056 6 Hall Blvd Skfewalk(0umham ST-to South of ll.N h Unfunded Gas Tm 7 .Avenue(Cammarcial to Green burg Rd Unfunded Gas Tor S Hunliker St.Sidewalk(Hall SW to 72nd Art) Unfunded Gal Tag $ _ p Unfunded Gas Tax S '(McL'�arwld to haurdvuk) Unfunded C—Tax $ 11 95th Avenue and North Dakota Street 51dewalks F,,:ly F„nded 4—rd1d W0,000 CDOG grant Gas Ta. Si 234AM 11 Was riartAvdnue Sidewalk fr%zrd St.to Ofthanburg Rd.) Unfunded Gas Tax 12 Tigard Street(Gaga Ave.to Fanno Creek Trail) Unfunded Gas Toa $' 13 Ash Ave.Sidewalk(Fauna Creek to McDonald Unfunded a5 erg - - 14 7Sth Avenue Sidewalk(Pfaflle to Spruce St) Unfunded Gas Talo 15 River Terrace Capltalrmprew:ment Pragetts-Transportation Un7unded u ftleir [uncut I Warn Myler Rapf4cemenr Program -,^Progress -'rep 1.140,OW Curren[ Wafer Main t in.Dverkzft Program 1'Progress .'Vater Vp - 905,0011 Current Aaufer Storage&Recovery We V e 3 in progress Current take 0swega•Ttgord Water Parrmraher in Progress Water CTP $ d18;859,927 Current Water f loo Replacement Prdgrdm rn Progrt�l Water $ 843,g00 Current fore Hydrant Replacements Program M Progress Wafer $ 6701" Current Main Street WaTirdim Rep2acemenr(Puciflc Hwy to Tigard St.) In Progress W.W War- 621,700 Currant Pip.&.[a Ldm g 550 Z.—W 530 Zone MPragrrs•5 Warer COP 2,260,1100 Current Fire Fbw Impmveme.nt Program to Progress Wdre,,LOP 550,000 Current New Wdrer$awoe Sysnemw7de lmpravementsProgram rd Pragre11 WOW CVP $ 925,Ck1d 4tim" 6arrawv%choik Perry l8"Wafer Line Llnensrons fphose 2) fn Progress War—S©[ $ 1,3d4,I:x, fmndanmant[Tigard allgh Schaal) in pragrau WaW,[ip $ 365.'.:..3.000 oing Sore Crossing Fully Funded Wetar,Wafsr QP $ 286,000.1 Staff Cade Ieservokand PurapSnatlanDesign Fully Funded Water 1,o5o,Coo Ciegteraf item afsllitlas enf Ckv W General un ater,Sam It.ry Siwer, 'I—F11101111m,€nhencenn-t Unfunded '.STormwater.&Gas Tax 5 590,000 Staff Exp—f Red Rack Cantarenpe Roam In City Hall Unfunded General Fund $ 190,000 Staff Expansion of C114 Including ctoretsand external entrance Unfunded ,General fund 5 105,000 Parks Pro ertar Currenr fu>r f:,: +yrrir¢rtr Pprk Ocvetaprprrit P'a•k>,t.;,..: S u36.39ry Current Funno[reek Mouse nP......s Par k>Fun:, $ 1NO,pi9 SOC.5annary Sewn,5[armwpnr,& Current Ohksen Harure Park tAarmerfv Su.—Creek Park) !a Progrrxs-Partblry F.Me W¢ter S 3,437,000 Current Tree Caaopy ReplPsemrnr Praaram In Praprrsa areafry 5 trbR999 k. Current leek Park In Progress 063,020 anlary • farmwaNr, ! Currenr Fanno C—A Tfpd-Main 5rreer ra Grant AveM Pragresr Sand;Park]50C $ 453,Jat� Lur,em Park Land Aequtsirian In Pragresk Parks 0.I'Poral 50C S 1,053,3DD Current Park Lard HeveMpmrnf 1n Progress $ da;0ap Currant do wore wn L¢nd Arqulsrrlon In Progress 1 S ],3a4,5aa C."—' Tigard 51—TraN&Pabar Sae-(Mala Sr.ra 77adem¢a Suilydoad SO In P,aerrsl-Ppnblir Funded Capita)p ars r 5 a23,139 Current Cary of Trgard/T7Pard-iLabflnSA-1 Ddfrkt Perk D—fopmanr In Praereat a.m! 5 135,099 Current 04mageH Tree RepM-1nl Program In Progresf .rosary }00,000 Currenr Farina Creek Trafa(Granr Ave to Woo wed Park) M Pragrrsr Urban Fareslry $ ,715,090 Current Update tae Po,ks Master Pbn Jar a—,Tmarr In Pr...... P.IiUS 55,pea Current Parks Sy—LrrwhPrnmYth¢rge Updar'e In Progress C y 25,b Currenr Senn P.rk M P/.Q— 5 Be,24H Curren, Ban M.—maim,Park In Praeress .,*x Band, a $ 75, Currant Pat-Deg Park In Pragrasa oras a 80,000 Fund, on tory Currenr 5ummer Lpke Park Reseraarn imprpremenrf fn Pragrrss Sr nr3rprmWePer&YYdfer $ I60,DDD 1 Fenner Geek 10w/CWS) Fully F--.d.werded$31-7 mila¢n RFFA grant Park $ 33erO -parts t o arena r r ry sirwar 2 Fenno Creek T-1 ILib—,,m Bonne Rd-) Canstn.von praJ.rt 5tarmweter S ry ewer Starr Fanno Creek Tlell Consedan Furey f—dad-ewerded 53.7 m irlio••R F FA avant 3tornnvater n $ 4034,628 Unfunded Unfunded _ 1 _. - - _ -Petals Unfunded 6•ann.oil.Pp 1W..0145.Trail-[[[.mewl ra null Mountain Rand) Unfunded Unknown 5 7 A—Fra Community Park Unfunded un _ a gawrFtown Clock Tow., Unfunded un 5 9 Turf Fleids w Cemmunaty Paras Unfunded PeNfk Hwy err Hell Gird.C—a ay(Flagpole) Unfunded Un npwn 11EkPend TFe Tigard Trail Syst4m Into rlta TIMM TfiMale Unfunded 11 Ttgetd Ttiengre Pees CPS) Unfunded UnxnOWn CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 267 PRIORITIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CIP Stormwater Current Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Irt Progress Stormwater $ 300,000 Current Copper Creek Bank Stabilization In Progress Stormwater $ 228,000 Current Stormwater Master Plan Update for River Terrace In Progress Stormwater $ 55,000 Current Derry Deff Bank Stab I zotxrr(118th Court) In Progress Stormwater $ 737,000 Current Community Tree Punting Program In Progress 5tarmwater $ 70,000 1 Maln Street5torm Rehabilitation(Fanno Creek) Fully Funded Stormwater $ 725,000 2 Storm Facility Reconstruction(Greenfield Drive near Pine View) Fully Funded Stormwater $ 358,000 3 Pacific Highway Median WQF Project Fully Funded Stormwater $ 67,850 4 Canterbury Lane Storm Sewer Upgrade(106th to Pacific Hwy) Fully Funded Stormwater $ 445,000 4 Burlcrest Dr.(Summer Crestto 121st Ave.) Fully Funded Stormwater $ 725,000 Staff Ridgefield Lane Water Quality Facility Repair/Stabilization Fully Funded Stormwater $ 365,000 5 River Terrace Capital Improvement Projects-Stormwater Unfunded Stormwater Sanitary Sewer Current Citywide Sanitary Sewer Extension Program In Progress Sanitary Sewer $ 201,700 Current Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program In Progress Sanitary Sewer $ 65Z000 Current Fanno Creek Slope Stabilization(Arthur Court) In Progress Sanitary Sewer $ 893,000 Gas ax, ars on, or s5 C, Sanitary Sewer,Storm water&Water Current Derry Delf Creel Sewer fnterceptor Refocation In Progress CIP $ 1,465,000 Current Main Street Sewer/Fanno Creek Crossing Eiimination in Progress Sanitary Sewer $ 437,000 Current 128th Ave/Shore Dr Sewer Replacement In Progress Sanitary Sewer $ 720,000 Current East Tigard Sewer Replacement In Progress Sanitary Sewer $ 1,530,WO Sanitary Sewer&Water Current Krueger Creek(Benchview)Slope StaWlization(Gallin Court) In Progress Quality/Quantfry $ 761,300 Current Sewer Rehabilitation Program In Progress Sanitary Sewer $ 2,876,000 Current 72nd Ave Sewer Modtfication(Bonda Rd) In Progress Sanitary Sewer $ 800,000 Current Sewer Master Plan Update for River Terrace In Progress Sanitary Sewer $ 55,000 Current Barrowsf5cholls Ferry 21 to 24"Sanitary Sewer tine Ertensions(River Road) in Progress Sanitary Sewer $ 910,000 Current Red Rock Creek Corridor Sewer 5ladv In Progress Sanitary Sewer $ 197,000 1 Red Rack Creek/Slope Stabilization Fully Funded Sanitary Sewer $ 200,000 Staff River Terrace Capital Improvement Prapects� Unfunded Unknown h t al r xt PAGE 268 - CITY OF TIGARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - STREETS 95442-Commercial Street Sidewalk and Storm Detention Facility(Main to Lincoln) Project bleed:Commercial Street currently lacks sidewalks west of Main Street.This project would connect a large residential neighborhood to downtown Tigard and the Tigard Transit Center.Rather high pedestrian volumes are observed despite the lack of adequate pedestrian facilities.Commercial Street is particularly narrow under this reach of the Pacific Ifighw,ay overcrossing. Project Description:This project will construct a sidewalk along one side of Commercial Street from Main Street under the Pacific Highway overcrossing to Lincoln Avenue.The railroad and 013cy1'may dictate the location of the sidewalk which could result in the roadway being slightly shifted to the southwest so that the sidewalk can be added on the northeast side of the roadway.NXItile the street is under construction,a stormwater vault will be added to treat over 47 acres of untreated stormwater that discharges into Fanno Creek. This project meets outfall retrofitting goals identified in the regional Healthy Streams Plan. *Construct 800'of 8'wide sidewalk between Main and Lincoln on northeast edge;potential roadway shift„construct a fence along south side to separate pedestrians from trains(STIP S900,0I10/City match$92,430). *Center Street Pedestrian Path-Formalize to center(STIP$75,000/city match 57,703. *Construct 550' of sidewalk from Naeve to Beef Bend(STIP$330,000/city match$33,891) Project Results.This project improves public safer•and access to downtown and to the transit center.This project supports the vision statement in the City of Tigard's Strategic Plan:"The most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest..." Project Funding:This project will be funded with the STIP 1-,nhance Project. The project Total will be$1,439,024,the ST]P grant will cover$1,305,000 and the cirr•'s responsbility is 5134,,024. Actual through Projected Project 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total EXPENSES Internal Expenses Project Management 0 0 fl 90,000 0 0 0 0 90,000 Construction Management 0 0 0 U 90,000 0 0 0 90,000 Total Internal 0 4 0 90,OW 90,000 0 0 0 180,000 External Expenses Public Involvement O 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 25,000 Land/R.ight of Way 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 4 50,000 Acquisition Design and Engineering 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 350,000 Construction 0 0 0 0 834,024 0 0 0 834,024 Contingency 0 0 0 10D,0011 230,000 0 0 0 330,10 Total External 0 0 O 525.000 1,064,024 0 0 0 1,589,024 Total Project Expense 0 0 0 61.5,000 1,154,024 0 0 0 1,769,024 REVENUES Revenue Funding Source 460-Transportation CIP 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 50,000 Fund 510-Storm water Fund 0 0 0 150,000 264,024 0 0 0 414,024 Total Revenue Funding 0 0 0 175,000 289,024 0 0 0 464,024 Other Revenue Soume Statewide Transportation 0 0 0 440,000 865,000 0 0 0 1,305,000 Improvement Program Total Other Revenue 0 0 0 440,000 865,000 0 0 0 1,305,000 Total Revenues 0 0 0 61.5,000 1,154,024 0 0 0 1,769,024 PAGE 276 - CITY OF TIGARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - STREETS 97017-Main Street Green Street Retrofit(Phase 2) Project Need:Continue Phase 1 improvements from the railroad tracks north m Scofftns Street. Project Description:The project will extend the improvements constructed in conjunction with Phase I northward,providing a seamless extension to the recent improvements at the intersection of Pacific I lighway/Main Street/Greenburg Road.Similar to Phase 1, Phase 2 will largely be funded through a grant from the Metropofitan Transportation Improvement Program(MTIP)to comply with green street standards.The disbursement and oversight of this grant will be handled by 0130T. Project Results:With the completion of Phase 2,the entire length of Nlain Street from Pacific Flighway on the south to Pacific Highway on the north will have been reconstructed to green street standards. Project Funding:The total project estimate is$2,436,733"There is$1,234,424 remaining as part of the hfTIP grant. This leaves the city's responsibility at$1,202,309. Actual through Projected Project 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total EXPENSES Internal Expenses Project 1llanagcment 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 200,000 Total Internal 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 200,000 External Expenses Public Involvement 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 100,000 {.and/Right of V'ay 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 Acquisition Design and Engineering 0 0 0 500,000 200,000 0 0 0 700,000 Construction 0 0 0 0 1,286,733 0 0 0 1,286,733 Contingency 0 0 0 140,OW 384,183 0 I) 0 524,183 Total External 0 0 0 840,000 1,920,916 0 0 0 2,7617 916 Total Project Expcnse 0 0 0 940,000 2,020,916 0 0 0 2,960,916 REVENUES Revenue Funding Source 460-Transportation CIP 0 0 0 490,000 1,236,492 0 0 0 1,726,492 Fund 'I"oral Revenue Funding 0 0 0 490,000 1,236,492 0 0 0 1,726,492 Other Revenue Source Metropolitan 0 0 0 450,000 784,424 0 0 0 1,234,424 Transportation Improvement Program Total Other Revenue 0 0 0 450,000 7S4,424 0 0 0 1,234,424 Total Revenues 0 0 0 940,000 2,020,916 0 0 0 2,960,916 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 277 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PARKS 92013-Fanno Creek Remeandet(City/CWS) Project Need:Clean Water Services(CXXIS)has proposed a`historic stream remeander restoration'for a section of Fanno Creek near Ash Avenue. Project Description:Lengthening the stream channel is recommended in order to lower or eliminate the rate of incision or erosion by decreasing*the steepness/slope of the stream bed.This will require the removal and replacement of the Ash Avenue Pedestrian Bridge,as well as reconstructing a segment of the Fax-mo Creek Trail. Project Results:The project will aid in the effort to restore the water quality of Fanno Creek.This project supports the vision statement in the City of Tigard's Strategic Plan:"...the most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest..." Project Funding:This is it part of Segment 2 from the Fanno Creek Trail Construction(92046).The overall project is funded in part from the$3.7 million Regional Flexible Funds(RFFA)Active Transportation and Complete Streets grant. This portion of the project to do the remeander with Clean Water Services is not the grant eligible and is funded by City sources, A small amount of funding is still needed to completely fund this project. ,actual through Projected Project 2014 3015 2016 2017 301€3 2019 2020 2021 Total EXPENSES Internal Expenses Project Management 0 0 fl 25,000 0 45,000 0 0 70,0{10 Construction Management[ 0 0 0 0 45,000 45,000 0 0 90,000 Total Internal 0 0 0 25,000 45,000 90,000 0 0 160,(100 External Expenses Design and Engineering 0 0 0 100,000 0 10AX) {1 0 110Ax1 Construction 0 {1 0 0 600,000 100,000 0 0 700,000 Prior Life-to-Date 35,780 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,780 Contingency 0 0 0 20,000 107,000 50,0[x] 0 Cl 177,000 Total External 35,780 0 0 120,000 707,000 160,000 0 0 1,022,780 Total Project Expense 35,780 0 0 145,000 752,000 250,000 0 0 1,182,780 REVENUES Revenue Funding Source 421-Parks Bond Fund 0 0 0 145,000 191,628 0 0 0 336,628 425-Parks SDC:Fund 35,780 0 0 0 560,372 250,000 {] 0 846,152 Total Revenue Funding 35,780 0 0 145,000 752,000 250,[100 0 0 1,182,780 Total Revenues 35,780 0 0 145,000 752,000 250,000 0 0 1,182,780 PAGE 280 - CITY OF TIGARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PARKS 92028-Downtown Land Acquisition Project Need:Purchase park sites within the downtown Tigard area. Project Description:Associated with the$17,0(}[),000 Park Bond,a portion of die proceeds were set aside to Purchase and devtlop property for parks-aathin the downtown area. Project Results:Property which sill he developed for park purposes in downtown Tigard. Actual through Projected Project 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total EXPENSES External Expenses Land/Right of Way 0 530;000 770,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,300,000- Acquisition ,300,000acquisition Prior Life-to-late 499 0 0 0 0 0 1] 0 499 "Total External 499 530,000 770,000 0 0 i] (Y 0 1,300099 Total Project Expense 499 530,000 770,000 0 0 0 i1 0 1,300,499, REVENUES Revenue Funding Source 421-Parks Bond Fund 499 530,000 770,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,300,499 Total Revenue Funding 499 530,000 770,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,300,499 Total Revenues 499 530,000 770,000 I"1 0 0 0 0 1,300,499 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 285 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PARKS 92034-Tigard Street Trail and Public Space(Main St.to Tiedeman Ave./Tigard St.) Project Need.Kcpuq)osc an existing and inactive rail corridor to a beneficial multi-modal public use. Project Description:The city is in negotiated with ODOT Rail and the Portland and Western Railroad to utilize an inactive railroad corridor from Tiedeman Avenue to Main Street in order to link area trails and Parks to downtown Tigard and the Tigard Transit(:enter. The corridor is currently a 16-foot gravel rail bed(unsuitable for walking as it is constructed of railroad ballast rock)that will be developed to accommodate a variety of mixed-use trail sections.The project corridor will extend from Main Street to an area near the intersection of Tiedeman Avenue and Tigard Street.An entry-vay or plaza will be constructed near the Chamber of Commerce.Due to ODOT Rail restrictions on pedestrian crossings within 250 feet of a rail crossing,trail users will be directed to the existing crossing of Main Street at Tigard Street.A preliminary trail alignment has been prepared to explore site opportunities and alignment considerations. The trail alignment and design will be advanced for land use review when funding becomes available. Project Results:Improved pedestrian and cycle access to downtown Tigard,the Tigard Transit Center,the Fanno Creek and Summer Creek'!'rails and Dirksen Nature Pari:.'Illis project supports the vision statement in the Citi,of Tigard's Strategic Plan:"...the most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest..." Project Funding.Project funding has not been determined. The funding available in FY 2016 for this project is Parks SDC to assist in pursing funding opportunitics(e.g.grants). Actual through Projected Project 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 'T'otal EXPENSES Internal Expenses Project Managemmt 0 35,000 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 Construction Management 0 0 0 C1 0 0 11 0 0 Prior Life-to-Date 1,742 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,742. Total Internal 1,742 35,000 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 46,742 External Expenses Public Involvement 0 0 0 0 I) 0 11 0 0 Design and Engineering 0 (t 0 0 fl 0 0 0 0 Prior Life-to-Date 39,049 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39,049 Total T:xt mai 39,049 0 0 0 0 0 3) 0 39,049 Total Project Expense 40,791 35,0{X1 10,()10 0 0 0 {D 0 85,791 REVENUES Revenue Funding Source 100-General Fund 0 20,000 0 0 0 t1 0 0 20,000 421-Parks Bond Fund 40,791 14,442 0 0 0 0 0 0 55,233 425-Parks SDC;Fund 0 558 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 10,558 Total Revenue Funding 40,791 35,000 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 85,791 Total Revenues 40,791 35,[)X) 10,()()0 0 0 {1 {1 0 85,791 PAGE 286 - CITY OF TIGARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PARKS 92046-Fanno Creels Trail Connection(RFFA Grant) Project Need.Construct segments of the Fanno Crock'frail. Project Description.The city,has received a Regional Flexible Funds(RFFA)Active Transportation and Complete Streets grant to construct Four(4)segments of the Fanno Creck Trail. This project will include:Segment 1-Grant Avenue to Woodard Park,Segment 2-Main Street to Ball Boulevard,Segment 3-City Library to Bonita Road,Segment 4-Durham Road at 85th:avenue to the Tualatin River.A separate project 92013%will realign the trail in conjunction with the Clean Water Services Creek Remeander. Project Results-All segments of the Fanno Creek Trail within Tigard will be complete except for the segment from Bonita Read to Durham,Road at 85th Avenue.This project supports the vision statement in the City of Tigard's Strategic Plan:"The most walkable community in the Pacific North-west..." Project Funding.'I he Regional Flexible Funds(RFFA)grant are federal dollars that will require Metro to provide all invoices to the Oregon Department of Transportation for payment. .'actual through Projected Project 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total EXPENSES Internal Expenses Design and Engineering 0 0 129,554 60,000 0 0 0 0 209,554 Project Management 0 I0,000 39,553 60,000 30,000 0 0 0 139,553 Construction Management 0 0 0 60,000 20,000 0 0 0 80,000 `fotalInternal 0 10,000 169,107 200,000 50,00() 0 0 0 429,107 External Expenses Land/R.4rht of Way 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 Acquisition Design and Engineering 0 0 370,893 440,000 160,000 0 0 0 970,893 Construction 0 0 0 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 0 0 2,400,000 Contingency 0 0 80,000 400,000 320,000 0 0 0 8001,(X10 Total External 0 0 450,893 2,240,000 1,650,000 0 0 0 4,370,893 Total Project Expense 0 10,000 620,000 2,440,(R10 1,730,000 0 0 0 4,800,000 REVENUES Revenue Funding Source 425-Parks SDC Fund 0 5,000 420,0100 672,440 320,000 0 0 1) 1,417,441) 510-Stornnvater Fund 0 5,000 2010,0001 97,560 0 0 0 0 302,560 Total Revenue funding 0 10,000 620,000 770,000 320,000 0 0 0 1,720,000 Other Revenue Source Regional Flexible funds 0 0 0 1,670,000 1,410,000 0 0 0 3,080,000 (RFFA) "Total Other Revenue 0 0 0 1,670,0[)[) 1,410,000 0 11 0 3,1180,000 Total Revenues 0 10,000 620,000 2,440,000 1,730,000 0 0 0 4,800,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-PAGE 289 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - STORMWATER 94028-Main Street Storm Rehabilitation(Fanno Creek) Project Need:Upgrade multiple stormwater outfalls. Project Description:The project kNift upgrade functional stormwater outfalls along Fanno Creek to sheet Hest Management Practices (13MP's)and abandon inactive stormeN-Ater outfalls.The city is partnering with Clean Water Services to provide slope beautification at the time this work is completed. Project Results;C)utfalis which meet BMPs and also reduce maintenance costs. Actual through Projected Project 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total EXPENSES Internal Expenses Project Management 0 0 0 35,000 10,000 0 0 0 45,000 Construction Management 0 0 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 Total Internal 0 0 0 35;000 35,000 0 0 0 70,00() External Expenses Desipi and Engineering 0 0 0 150,000 5,000 0 0 0 155,0100 Construction 0 0 0 0 5(1),0[)} 0 0 0 500,0()0 Contingency 0 0 0 3{1,(100 126,250 0 0 0 156,250 Tonal External 0 0 0 180,000 631,250 0 0 () 811,250 Total Project Expense 0 0 0 215,000 666,250 0 [} 0 8$1,250 REVENUES Revenue Funding Source 510-Stormwater Fund 0 0 0 215,000 666,250 0 0 0 881,250 Total Revenue Funding l 0 0 215,000 666,250 0 [1 0 881,250 Total Revenues (} 0 0 215,1100 666,250 {1 (1 0 881,350 PAGE 316- CITY OF TIGARD Tigard City Center Development Agency .71d CCDA MEMORANDUM TO: Chair Arendes and the City Center Advisory Commission FROM: Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Project Manager RE: Agenda Item 6: Saxony Site Update DATE: August 5, 2015 On May 26, 2015, the City Council authorized a resolution to complete the purchase of the Saxony-Pacific properties on Main Street. On July 9th, the City of Tigard closed on the properties. Because the property was purchased with Park Bond funds, there is a fixed timeline to determine the best use of the site. Within 20 months of closing (by January 2017), the city must designate which portion (if any) of the property will be public space, with any remaining portion to be sold for private redevelopment. The funds from any sale to a developer will reimburse the Parks Bond. The city has engaged Resolve Architecture and Planning to study the site over the next twelve months. Their scope of work includes site and building design, economic feasibility, taking the design through land use approval, and public involvement. The first phase of the project will be to determine what type of development can be built on the site. The site has constraints in that all of the property is in the100-year floodplain, with portions in the floodway and vegetated corridor. Resolve Architecture, working with staff, will determine what can be built within the limitations of Clean Water Services (CWS), Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA), Army Corps of Engineers, Oregon Department of State Lands, and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) regulations and those of the Tigard Development Code. The scope of work provides for an innovative "Developer Teaming" approach for this project. The consultant team is expected to select a developer (or development advisor) to play an active role in shaping the plans. By involving a developer partner early, cleaning up the site, creating an architecturally exciting concept and absorbing the costs of entitling the project, development of the site is expected to be marketable and financeable by late 2016. Prior to closing the City obtained a Prospective Purchaser Agreement (PPA) with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). This agreement spells out the City's cleanup obligations and liability limitations for existing contamination The city is committed to perform further testing (five soil gas sample points with follow-up soil and groundwater sampling) once the structures are demolished. This investigation will evaluate whether soil cleanup work may be necessary to reduce or eliminate the need for a vapor mitigation system. The city's environmental consultant estimated a likely cost to receive a No Further Action Letter from DEQ to be approximately $260,000. This includes testing, remediation, vapor barrier installation, and DEQ oversight. The city intends to apply for a Brownfield clean-up grant from the EPA to assist with these costs. Project Milestones: September 2015: Visioning Charrette December 2015: Project Open House December 2015: Apply for U.S. EPA Brownfields Clean-up Grant May 2016: EPA grant notification September-December 2016: Demolition and clean-up of property (estimate) March 2017: Decision on the future of the site (park bond funds requirement) 2 "Ar t * v d � AA T'• S •Au F i i �' q f 4 , �I x'94` _ , , '� t �'� h�,i 4: 6 . ,` _ '•� + AL, { q- On-Street: Occupancy by Hour of Day - Vehicles Parked versus Empty Stalls 9 - 10 10 - 11 11AM -On-Street • AM AM Noon Vehicles 36 42 43 82 53 51 52 57 53 42 Parked Percentage 28.6/ 33.3/ 34.1/ 65.1% 42.1/ 40.5/ 41.3/ 45.2/ 42.1/ 33.3/ Occupied Empty Stalls 90 84 83 44 73 75 74 69 73 84 Combined Off-street Supply: Occupancy by Hour of Day — Vehicles Parked versus Empty Stalls • , AM 11 AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM jg Off-street Vehicles 288 356 402 468 425 396 386 390 316 251 Parked Percentage o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Occupied 32.8/0 40.6/ 45.8/0 53.4% 48.5/0 45.2/0 44.0% 44.5/0 36.0% 28.6/0 Empty Stalls 589 521 475 409 452 481 491 487 561 626 Tigard Downtown Parking Utilization - June 2015 2015 off-street occuparcies (877 stalls) 60% 50°/ 45.5% - 45. ° 44.0° 44.5° 40.6% - 40% - r 30..0°l 32.5% 000/0 28,6% i 2Yo 10% 0 -_ 9:30 AM 10:30 AM 11:30 AM 12:30 PM 1:30 PM 2:30 PM 3:30 PM 4:.30 PM 5:30 PM 6:30 PM Tigard Downtown Parking Utilization - June 2015 2015 onstreet,offstreet, and combined occupancies North of railroad MOn-Street(54 stalls) ®Off-Street (476 staIIS) 61COnibined (.530 stalls) 409€, rn Ct rn rn 0 e rn Ln Ln3 V Ln 25' c 00 209 ^� 15° 1 , r� 5% 09 9:30 AM 10:30 AM11:30 AM12:.30 PM 1:30 PM 2.:30 PM 3:30 PM 4:30 PM .5:30 PM 6:30 PM Tigardmown Parking Utilization June 2015 2015 onstreet, offstreet, and combined occupancies South of railroad 0On-Strut (72 stalls) N Off--Street (40 1 stalls) i.iCombined (473 stalls) 100% 90% ars a � ,n o ,` LA 7 aQ -! �0 tc„ un 4 a 309/6 204 0 10 9:30 AM 10,30 A '111 30 AM 12:30 PM 1.30 PM 2:30 PIS? ?:?O M 4:30 PARI 5:30 PM 6:30 PM � [ NIS lit t i - rs :t. 40 y %`� r M' M 1 f •� M ` } . d, I Recommendations • 2 Hour parking on Burnham Street • Some level of enforcement in Burnham public parking lot • Encourage shared parking arrangements on private lots • Regularly monitor parking supply