City Council Packet - 11/17/2015
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE AND TIME:November 17, 2015 - 6:30 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION:City of Tigard - Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Times noted are estimated.
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for
Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410
(voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
• Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and
• Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead
time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by
calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE:
http://live.tigard-or.gov
Workshop meetings are cablecast on Tualatin Valley Community TV as follows:
Replay Schedule for Tigard City Council Workshop Meetings - Channel 28
Every Sunday at 12 a.m.
Every Monday at 1 p.m.
Every Thursday at 12 p.m.
Every Friday at 10:30 a.m.
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE AND TIME:November 17, 2015 - 6:30 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION:City of Tigard - Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223
6:30 PM
1.WORKSHOP MEETING
A.Call to Order - City Council
B.Roll Call
C.Pledge of Allegiance
D.Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
2. JOINT MEETING WITH THE PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD - 6:35
p.m. estimated time
3. CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON THE PARKS AND RECREATION CHARGE - 7:25 p.m.
estimated time
4. UPDATE ON THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM - 8:05 p.m. estimated time
5. CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON THE SIDEWALK GAP PROGRAM - 8:35 p.m. estimated
time
6. UPDATE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS - 9:05 p.m.
estimated time
7.NON AGENDA ITEMS
8.EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive
Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable
statute. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by
ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. Executive Sessions are closed to
the public.
9.ADJOURNMENT - 9:30 p.m. estimated time
AIS-2338 2.
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date:11/17/2015
Length (in minutes):50 Minutes
Agenda Title:Joint Meeting with the Park and Recreation Advisory Board
Prepared For: Steve Martin, Public Works Submitted By:Steve
Martin,
Public
Works
Item Type: Joint Meeting-Board or Other Juris.Meeting Type: Council
Workshop
Mtg.
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Should the Council meet with the PRAB to discuss parks and recreation?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends that Council meet with the PRAB to discuss park and recreation issues.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Park and Recreation Advisory Board meets with Council annually to discuss topics
concerning parks and recreation, and to get direction from Council for the next year. The
PRAB last met with Council in November, 2014.
The relevant topics that could be discussed this year include:
The recent election results for the community and recreation center, and future direction
for the the PRAB regarding its involvement in next steps.
1.
The types of recreation programs that the Council and the PRAB wish to see
implemented in 2016 following the city's study of its role in recreation.
2.
The future of park acquisition and development after the 2010 park bond.3.
The Parks and Recreation Charge (PARC) that is in development.4.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
The Council could choose not to meet with the PRAB.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
The Council and the PRAB will discuss issues dealing with parks and recreation that are on
both the Council and PRAB goals.
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
The Council last met with the PRAB in November, 2014.
AIS-2327 3.
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date:11/17/2015
Length (in minutes):40 Minutes
Agenda Title:Continued Discussion on Parks & Recreation Charge
Prepared For: Toby LaFrance Submitted By:Norma
Alley,
Central
Services
Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct
Staff
Meeting Type: Council
Workshop
Mtg.
Public Hearing
Newspaper Legal Ad Required?:
No
Public Hearing Publication
Date in Newspaper:
Information
ISSUE
Staff will update Council on the continuing development of a Park and Recreation Charge and
equivalent Property Tax Levy options.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Staff requests feedback from Council on continuing policy issues in developing the funding
scenarios for parks. Currently, a hearing is scheduled for January 12, 2016. This is a tentative
date where Council could consider a Park and Recreation Charge (PARC). Staff is seeking
direction from Council on:
If Council still wants to consider funding park services differently; either through the
PARC, a vote special option tax levy, or other means?
If Council does choose to fund parks differently, which of the seven park service
scenarios, and their resulting costs, should be included?
If Council does choose the PARC, which fee implementation structure should be
selected and what is the timing for implementation?
Does Council wish to hold the hearing scheduled for January 12, 2016?
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
During the Budget Committee meetings, the committee considered the course of Tigard's
During the Budget Committee meetings, the committee considered the course of Tigard's
General Fund and the services it supports: Police, Library, Community Building, and Parks.
The General Fund revenues grow approximately 3.5% annually, while expenses grow 4.0%
annually. Tigard has taken actions in prior years to limit cost growth and has added
incremental revenues. The Budget Committee decided to take a different direction with the
Fiscal Year 2016 budget; moving Parks to a separate fund modeled after a utility. The
Committee chose parks because of the need to develop and maintain the parks purchased
with the $17 million Park Bond that has expanded Tigard's park acreage by 30 percent. The
direction in the FY 2016 budget is to fund parks using a utility fee that will be paid as part of
the utility bill.
Staff presented initial policy issues to Council on October 20, 2015. Based on Council
feedback this presentation will focus on the following areas:
City comparisons of taxes and fees1.
Parks and recreation service cost scenarios2.
Parks and Recreation Charge (PARC) modeling scenarios3.
Preliminary findings of PARC and equivalent Property Tax Levy4.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
Council can choose to return parks maintenance to the General Fund and not enhance park
services.
COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS
Provide recreation opportunities for the people of Tigard
Make Downtown Tigard a place where people want to be
DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION
October 20, 2015
Attachments
PowerPoint Presentation
Pa
r
k
s
a
n
d
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
Ch
a
r
g
e
Co
u
n
c
i
l
U
p
d
a
t
e
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
7
,
2
0
1
5
Ci
t
y
o
f
T
i
g
a
r
d
Page 2
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
O
u
t
l
i
n
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
In
p
u
t
f
r
o
m
l
a
s
t
c
o
u
n
c
i
l
w
o
r
k
s
e
s
s
i
o
n
Ci
t
y
c
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
s
o
f
t
a
x
e
s
a
n
d
f
e
e
s
Pa
r
k
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
C
h
a
r
g
e
(
P
A
R
C
)
m
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
P
A
R
C
a
n
d
e
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
T
a
x
L
e
v
y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
t
i
m
e
l
i
n
e
Page 3
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
Re
a
s
o
n
s
f
o
r
a
P
A
R
C
–
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
g
e
t
s
m
o
r
e
e
x
p
e
n
s
i
v
e
th
e
l
o
n
g
e
r
i
t
i
s
d
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
.
–
Ot
h
e
r
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
s
m
s
(
e
.
g
.
,
sy
s
t
e
m
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
c
h
a
r
g
e
s
)
h
e
l
p
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
a
s
s
e
t
s
,
n
o
t
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
m
.
–
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
e
a
c
h
y
e
a
r
,
th
e
m
a
i
n
s
o
u
r
c
e
o
f
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
(
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
)
i
s
a
li
m
i
t
e
d
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
w
i
t
h
m
a
n
y
de
m
a
n
d
s
.
–
Ov
e
r
t
h
e
l
a
s
t
1
5
ye
a
r
s
,
p
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
ha
s
g
r
o
w
n
6
6
%
w
h
i
l
e
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
t
o
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
s
h
a
s
o
n
l
y
g
r
o
w
n
12
%
.
To
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
a
r
e
l
i
a
b
l
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
o
f
re
v
e
n
u
e
f
o
r
p
a
r
k
s
o
n
g
o
i
n
g
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
.
Page 4
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
In
p
u
t
f
r
o
m
l
a
s
t
s
e
s
s
i
o
n
Ke
e
p
i
t
s
i
m
p
l
e
Be
m
i
n
d
f
u
l
o
f
a
l
l
o
t
h
e
r
t
a
x
e
s
a
n
d
f
e
e
s
p
a
i
d
b
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
Ch
a
r
g
e
b
o
t
h
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
no
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
As
s
u
m
e
a
n
n
u
a
l
i
n
f
l
a
t
i
o
n
e
s
c
a
l
a
t
i
o
n
Co
m
p
a
r
e
a
n
d
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
m
e
n
u
o
f
r
a
t
e
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
Page 5
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
R
a
t
e
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
s
(
F
Y
2
0
1
4
/
1
5
)
Ti
g
a
r
d
’
s
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
B
i
l
l
i
s
i
n
t
h
e
u
p
p
e
r
h
a
l
f
o
f
c
o
m
p
a
r
a
b
l
e
c
i
t
i
e
s
.
W
e
s
t
L
i
n
n
G
r
e
s
h
a
m
H
i
l
l
s
b
o
r
o
T
u
a
l
a
t
i
n
S
h
e
r
w
o
o
d
B
e
a
v
e
r
t
o
n
O
r
e
g
o
n
C
i
t
y
T
i
g
a
r
d
M
i
l
w
a
u
k
i
e
W
i
l
s
o
n
v
i
l
l
e
Lake Oswego Portland
St
r
e
e
t
/
O
t
h
e
r
$1
0
.
8
3
$
7
.
5
0
$
4
.
6
4
$
3
.
9
2
$
5
.
5
3
$
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
.
2
6
$
6
.
1
2
$
3
.
3
5
$
4
.
0
3
$
8
.
4
4
$
1
.
2
0
Su
r
f
a
c
e
W
a
t
e
r
$5
.
8
6
$
1
0
.
0
9
$
6
.
7
2
$
7
.
6
4
$
2
6
.
1
0
$
9
.
2
5
$
9
.
0
5
$
7
.
2
5
$
1
6
.
9
9
$
6
.
9
5
$
1
2
.
5
8
$
2
6
.
5
6
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
$3
6
.
0
8
$
2
7
.
4
9
$
3
9
.
6
1
$
4
2
.
4
8
$
3
4
.
7
3
$
4
2
.
7
9
$
3
5
.
5
2
$
4
0
.
7
9
$
5
8
.
9
7
$
7
2
.
9
4
$
6
6
.
3
7
$
7
6
.
0
0
Wa
t
e
r
$2
6
.
2
0
$
3
4
.
2
6
$
2
9
.
6
1
$
2
9
.
6
9
$
2
4
.
8
9
$
4
2
.
7
0
$
3
9
.
6
4
$
5
9
.
1
7
$
3
9
.
6
5
$
4
5
.
8
8
$
5
3
.
4
6
$
7
1
.
0
1
To
t
a
l
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
$7
8
.
9
7
$
7
9
.
3
4
$
8
0
.
5
8
$
8
3
.
7
3
$
9
1
.
2
5
$
9
4
.
7
4
$
9
6
.
4
7
$
1
1
3
.
3
3
$
1
1
8
.
9
6
$
1
2
9
.
8
0
$
1
4
0
.
8
5
$
1
7
4
.
7
7
An
n
u
a
l
T
o
t
a
l
$9
4
8
$
9
5
2
$
9
6
7
$
1
,
0
0
5
$
1
,
0
9
5
$
1
,
1
3
7
$
1
,
1
5
8
$
1
,
3
6
0
$
1
,
4
2
8
$
1
,
5
5
8
$
1
,
6
9
0
$
2
,
0
9
7
So
u
r
c
e
:
C
i
t
y
o
f
L
a
k
e
O
s
w
e
g
o
T
a
x
a
n
d
F
e
e
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
1
4
-
2
0
1
5
;
C
o
m
p
i
l
e
d
b
y
F
C
S
G
R
O
U
P
.
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
R
a
t
e
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
:
20
1
4
-
1
5
(
p
e
r
s
i
n
g
l
e
f
a
m
i
l
y
h
o
m
e
)
Page 6
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
Co
s
t
o
f
L
i
v
i
n
g
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
s
(
F
Y
2
0
1
4
/
1
5
)
Ti
g
a
r
d
’
s
t
o
t
a
l
t
a
x
a
n
d
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
c
o
s
t
i
s
i
n
t
h
e
l
o
w
e
r
t
h
i
r
d
o
f
c
o
m
p
a
r
a
b
l
e
ci
t
i
e
s
;
a
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
m
i
d
-
p
o
i
n
t
a
s
a
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
o
f
m
e
d
i
a
n
h
o
u
s
e
h
o
l
d
in
c
o
m
e
.
Ci
t
y
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
Me
d
i
a
n
Ho
u
s
e
h
o
l
d
In
c
o
m
e
"C
i
t
y
"
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
Ta
x
e
s
Ot
h
e
r
Lo
c
a
l
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
Ta
x
e
s
Ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Co
s
t
(
f
r
o
m
pr
i
o
r
ta
b
l
e
)
Ot
h
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Co
s
t
*
To
t
a
l
Co
s
t
P
e
r
Ho
u
s
e
h
o
ld
% of House-hold Income
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
s
t
o
f
L
i
v
i
n
g
:
2
0
1
4
-
1
5
Tu
a
l
a
t
i
n
2
6
,
9
2
5
$
6
1
,
2
5
0
$
1
,
4
6
0
$
3
,
8
9
3
$
1
,
0
0
5
$
2
,
4
9
9
$8
,
8
5
7
14%
Gr
e
s
h
a
m
1
0
6
,
4
5
5
$
4
7
,
1
4
7
$
1
,
4
6
7
$
4
,
0
3
6
$
9
5
2
$
2
,
5
8
8
$9
,
0
4
4
19%
Hi
l
l
s
b
o
r
o
9
5
,
3
1
0
$
6
5
,
1
5
8
$
1
,
7
9
6
$
3
,
8
3
0
$
9
6
7
$
2
,
4
6
7
$9
,
0
6
1
14%
Ti
g
a
r
d
49
,
1
4
0
$
6
1
,
7
5
8
$
1
,
6
0
7
$
3
,
8
7
7
$
1
,
3
6
0
$
2
,
4
8
3
$9
,
3
2
8
1
5
%
We
s
t
L
i
n
n
2
5
,
5
4
0
$
8
4
,
5
1
9
$
1
,
4
6
5
$
4
,
6
3
3
$
9
4
8
$
2
,
5
1
1
$9
,
5
5
7
11%
Or
e
g
o
n
C
i
t
y
3
3
,
7
6
0
$
6
0
,
2
2
3
$
2
,
4
6
3
$
3
,
5
3
6
$
1
,
1
5
8
$
2
,
5
0
3
$9
,
6
6
0
16%
La
k
e
O
s
w
e
g
o
3
7
,
1
0
5
$
8
3
,
6
2
5
$
1
,
9
3
0
$
3
,
6
9
6
$
1
,
6
9
0
$
2
,
4
8
3
$9
,
7
9
9
12%
Sh
e
r
w
o
o
d
1
8
,
9
5
5
$
7
8
,
3
5
5
$
2
,
3
9
2
$
3
,
8
2
8
$
1
,
0
9
5
$
2
,
4
9
2
$9
,
8
0
7
13%
Mi
l
w
a
u
k
i
e
2
0
,
4
8
5
$
5
1
,
8
0
5
$
2
,
3
8
4
$
3
,
8
4
1
$
1
,
4
2
8
$
2
,
5
7
5
$1
0
,
2
2
7
20%
Wi
l
s
o
n
v
i
l
l
e
2
1
,
9
8
0
$
5
6
,
4
3
0
$
2
,
3
4
0
$
3
,
8
0
0
$
1
,
5
9
2
$
2
,
5
2
3
$1
0
,
2
5
5
18%
Be
a
v
e
r
t
o
n
9
3
,
3
9
5
$
5
6
,
1
0
7
$
2
,
6
5
2
$
4
,
0
3
6
$
1
,
1
3
7
$
2
,
5
1
7
$1
0
,
3
4
1
18%
Po
r
t
l
a
n
d
6
0
1
,
5
1
0
$
5
2
,
6
5
7
$
3
,
1
9
8
$
4
,
7
1
0
$
2
,
0
9
7
$
2
,
5
8
1
$1
2
,
5
8
6
24%
So
u
r
c
e
:
C
i
t
y
o
f
L
a
k
e
O
s
w
e
g
o
T
a
x
a
n
d
F
e
e
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
1
4
-
2
0
1
5
;
C
o
m
p
i
l
e
d
b
y
F
C
S
G
R
O
U
P
.
Page 7
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
Be
n
e
f
i
t
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
(
b
y
ED
U
)
PA
R
C
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
Fi
s
c
a
l
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
Fo
r
e
c
a
s
t
Co
s
t
s
&
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
Co
s
t
s
b
y
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
Cl
a
s
s
(
R
e
s
a
n
d
No
n
R
e
s
)
Page 8
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
PA
R
C
M
o
d
e
l
s
&
S
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
Ti
g
a
r
d
i
s
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
c
o
m
b
in
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
7
p
a
r
k
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
i
n
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
P
A
R
C
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
p
a
r
k
s
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
De
f
e
r
r
e
d
p
a
r
k
s
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
p
a
r
k
s
l
a
n
d
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
n
e
w
p
a
r
k
s
(l
a
n
d
n
o
t
y
e
t
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
d
)
In
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
–
re
v
e
n
u
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
t
o
o
f
f
s
e
t
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
In
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
o
f
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
s
s
e
t
s
–
Ar
t
s
a
n
d
c
u
l
t
u
r
e
–
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
(
i
n
p
a
r
k
s
)
Page 9
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
Fi
n
d
i
n
g
s
:
E
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
D
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
U
n
i
t
s
(
E
D
U
s
)
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
i
n
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
2
0
1
5
-
16
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
i
n
Fi
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
20
1
5
-
1
6
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
ED
U
s
p
e
r
Ac
c
o
u
n
t
B
i
l
l
a
b
l
e
E
D
U
s
in
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
2015-16
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
s
i
n
g
l
e
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
13
,
2
2
2
0.
9
9
13,114
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
m
u
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
58
7
1
2
.
5
6
7
,
3
7
3
No
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
91
6
2.
2
2
2,029
No
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
13
4.
3
8
57
To
t
a
l
14
,
7
3
8
2
2
,
5
7
3
Page 10
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
Fi
n
d
i
n
g
s
:
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
Al
l
S
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
:
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
F
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
Ab
o
v
e
c
h
a
r
t
i
s
i
l
l
u
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
o
f
t
h
e
f
un
d
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
a
l
l
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
,
sh
o
w
i
n
g
t
h
e
g
r
o
w
t
h
i
n
c
o
s
t
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
s
p
l
i
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
n
o
n
-
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
.
Bu
m
p
i
n
F
Y
2
0
1
8
-
1
9
i
s
d
u
e
t
o
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
e
d
f
o
r
D
i
r
k
s
e
n
N
a
t
u
r
e
P
a
r
k
.
Si
m
i
l
a
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
e
a
ch
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
v
e
n
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
.
Page 11
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
Fi
n
d
i
n
g
s
:
P
A
R
C
R
a
t
e
s
(
d
r
a
f
t
)
De
f
e
r
r
e
d
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
c
a
u
g
h
t
u
p
i
n
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
y
e
a
r
,
c
a
u
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
f
e
e
t
o
be
h
i
g
h
e
r
i
n
F
Y
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
.
F
e
e
i
s
l
o
w
e
r
i
n
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
y
e
a
r
.
Co
s
t
e
s
c
a
l
a
t
i
o
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
s
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
c
o
s
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
F
Y
2
0
2
0
-
2
1
.
Fi
v
e
Y
e
a
r
F
i
x
e
d
R
a
t
e
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
t
h
e
a
v
e
r
a
g
e
f
e
e
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
f
i
v
e
y
e
a
r
s
a
n
d
i
s
he
l
p
f
u
l
f
o
r
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
e
qu
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
a
x
l
e
v
y
.
Sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
Mo
n
t
h
l
y
P
A
R
C
r
a
t
e
p
e
r
E
D
U
,
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
*
FY
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
Mo
n
t
h
l
y
Ra
t
e
(Y
e
a
r
1
)
FY
2
0
1
7
-
1
8
Mo
n
t
h
l
y
Ra
t
e
(Y
e
a
r
2
)
FY
2
0
2
0
-
2
1
Mo
n
t
h
l
y
Ra
t
e
(Y
e
a
r
5
)
or Five Year Fixed Rate 1
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
B
u
d
g
e
t
$9
8
.
1
7
$
8
.
1
8
$
8
.
5
3
$
9
.
5
0
$
8
.
8
3
2
.
D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
$5
2
.
0
2
$
4
.
3
3
$
1
.
1
3
$
1
.
1
5
$
1
.
8
7
3
.
F
u
l
l
y
F
u
n
d
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$3
7
.
8
2
$
3
.
1
5
$
2
.
2
2
$
0
.
0
0
$
1
.
9
2
4
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
O
p
e
r
a
t
e
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
L
a
n
d
s
$8
.
9
8
$
0
.
7
5
$
0
.
8
3
$
1
.
0
8
$
0
.
9
1
5
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
O
p
e
r
a
t
e
N
e
w
L
a
n
d
s
$3
.
7
3
$
0
.
3
1
$
0
.
4
4
$
0
.
8
6
$
0
.
5
8
6
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
$6
.
7
5
$
0
.
5
6
$
0
.
6
7
$
2
.
2
3
$
1
.
3
8
7
.
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
A
s
s
e
t
s
$8
.
8
9
$
0
.
7
4
$
0
.
7
6
$
0
.
8
2
$
0
.
7
8
T
o
t
a
l
$2
1
6
.
3
7
$
1
8
.
0
3
$
1
4
.
5
8
$
1
5
.
6
5
$
1
6
.
2
8
*R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
N
o
n
-
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
E
D
U
s
a
r
e
C
h
a
r
g
e
d
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
p
e
r
E
D
U
.
1 No
t
e
t
h
a
t
f
i
v
e
y ea
r
f
i
x
e
d
r
a
t
e
s
/
a
v
e
r
a
g es
m
a
y c
a
u
s
e
a
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y i
n
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
y ea
r
s
,
i
f
e
x
p en
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
i
n
e
a
r
l
y y ea
r
s
a
r
e
h
i
g he
r
t
h
a
n
l
a
t
e
r
y ears.
A
n
n
u
a
l
Re
v
e
n
u
e
pe
r
E
D
U
F
Y
20
1
6
-
1
7
(Y
e
a
r
1
)
Page 12
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
Fi
n
d
i
n
g
s
:
P
r
o
p
.
T
a
x
L
e
v
y
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
In
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
P
A
R
C
,
N
o
n
-
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
b
e
a
r
s
9
%
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
c
o
s
t
.
No
n
-
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
a
l
a
r
g
e
r
p
r
o
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
a
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
v
a
l
u
e
o
f
Ti
g
a
r
d
,
c
r
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
l
o
w
e
r
c
o
s
t
p
e
r
a
v
e
r
a
g
e
h
o
u
s
e
h
o
l
d
u
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
a
x
le
v
y
a
s
t
h
e
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
u
r
c
e
.
Sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
Eq
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
T
a
x
L
e
v
y
*
*
An
n
u
a
l
M
i
l
ra
t
e
,
F
Y
20
1
6
-
1
7
An
n
u
a
l
Av
g
.
C
o
s
t
on
$
2
4
0
k
ho
m
e
or
An
n
u
a
l
M
i
l
ra
t
e
,
F
i
v
e
Ye
a
r
Av
e
r
a
g
e
Annual Avg. Cost on $240k Home
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
B
u
d
g
e
t
$9
8
.
1
7
0
.
4
0
5
6
$
9
7
.
3
5
0
.
4
4
1
8
$
1
0
6
.
0
3
2
.
D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
$5
2
.
0
2
0
.
2
1
4
9
$
5
1
.
5
9
0
.
0
9
3
7
$
2
2
.
5
0
3
.
F
u
l
l
y
F
u
n
d
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$3
7
.
8
2
0
.
1
5
6
3
$
3
7
.
5
0
0
.
0
9
6
1
$
2
3
.
0
6
4
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
O
p
e
r
a
t
e
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
L
a
n
d
s
$8
.
9
8
0
.
0
3
7
1
$
8
.
9
1
0
.
0
4
5
7
$
1
0
.
9
6
5
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
O
p
e
r
a
t
e
N
e
w
L
a
n
d
s
$3
.
7
3
0
.
0
1
5
4
$
3
.
7
0
0
.
0
2
9
1
$
6
.
9
9
6
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
$6
.
7
5
0
.
0
2
7
9
$
6
.
6
9
0
.
0
6
9
2
$
1
6
.
6
0
7
.
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
A
s
s
e
t
s
$8
.
8
9
0
.
0
3
6
7
$
8
.
8
2
0
.
0
3
9
0
$
9
.
3
6
T
o
t
a
l
$2
1
6
.
3
7
0
.
8
9
4
0
$
2
1
4
.
5
6
0
.
8
1
4
6
$
1
9
5
.
5
0
*R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
N
o
n
-
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
E
D
U
s
a
r
e
C
h
a
r
g
e
d
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
p
e
r
E
D
U
.
**
T
o
t
a
l
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
V
a
l
u
e
i
n
C
i
t
y o
f
T
i
g ar
d
:
$
5
,
8
3
8
,
0
1
9
,
2
2
4
**
A
v
e
r
a
g e
H
o
m
e
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
V
a
l
u
e
:
:
$
2
4
0
,
0
0
0
**
A
v
e
r
a
g e
a
n
n
u
a
l
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
:
9
4
%
So
u
r
c
e
:
Co
m
p
i
l
e
d
b
y
F
C
S
G
R
O
U
P
.
A
n
n
u
a
l
Re
v
e
n
u
e
pe
r
E
D
U
F
Y
20
1
6
-
1
7
(Y
e
a
r
1
)
Page 13
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
Di
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
PA
R
C
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
n
p
u
t
Co
u
n
c
i
l
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
Lo
c
a
l
l
y
p
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
(
s
)
Ra
t
e
m
o
d
e
l
r
e
f
i
n
e
m
e
n
t
Page 14
FC
S
G
R
O
U
P
Ti
m
e
l
i
n
e
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
Se
p
t
O
c
t
N
o
v
D
e
c
J
a
n
Ta
s
k
1
:
D
a
t
a
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
&
I
s
s
u
e
s
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
1
.
1
D
a
t
a
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
a
n
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
M
t
g
.
(
1
)
1
.
2
N
W
P
a
r
k
s
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
F
e
e
S
u
r
v
e
y
1
.
3
P
a
r
k
s
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
F
e
e
I
s
s
u
e
s
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
Ta
s
k
2
:
M
o
d
e
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
&
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
F
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
2
.
1
-
2
.
9
M
o
d
e
l
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
/
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
F
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
(
1
0
/
2
0
)
Ta
s
k
3
:
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
&
F
e
e
M
o
d
e
l
3
.
1
R
a
t
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
3
.
2
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
F
e
e
M
o
d
e
l
3
.
3
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
R
a
t
e
S
t
u
d
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
D
r
a
f
t
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
(
1
1
/
1
7
)
3
.
3
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
R
a
t
e
S
t
u
d
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
F
i
n
a
l
Pu
b
l
i
c
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
K
E
Y
:
Me
e
t
i
n
g
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
Dr
a
f
t
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
To
d
d
C
h
a
s
e
,
A
I
C
P
,
L
E
E
D
AP
50
3
.
8
4
1
.
6
5
4
3
ww
w
.
f
c
s
g
r
o
u
p
.
c
o
m
AIS-2363 4.
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date:11/17/2015
Length (in minutes):30 Minutes
Agenda Title:Safe Routes to School Update
Submitted By:Liz Hormann, Community
Development
Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council
Workshop
Mtg.
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Update on the City of Tigard Safe Routes to School Program, including a recap of the
October 7 International Walk & Bike to School Day events and current program activities.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
N/A
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City of Tigard was awarded a $150,000 Regional Travel Options grant through Metro to
fund a full time Safe Routes to School Coordinator for two years. The Safe Routes to School
(SRTS) Program promotes and supports safe, healthy and active transportation to and from
school through encouragement events, education, engineering, and enforcement.
The Tigard SRTS coordinator started in July and has worked to build relationships with the
principals, parents, and students at all eight of the Tigard-area elementary and middle schools.
This initial outreach culminated with the October 7, 2015 International Walk & Bike to
School Day. More than 1,000 Tigard-area students participated by walking, biking, or rolling
to school. This was the first time Tigard had 100% participation of its elementary and middle
schools in a walk and bike event. These celebratory events demonstrated to educators, parents
and the community the enthusiasm for active transportation choices, while bringing attention
and awareness to the importance of safe routes for students.
In addition to these events the SRTS coordinator and planner liaisons are working to build a
foundation for a SRTS program by collecting baseline data and developing maps for each
school. Data collection efforts are underway to determine how students get to and from
school and to identify the key barriers and concerns related to walking and biking.
All of this initial work builds the foundation for a SRTS program in each school. The next
step is to develop school specific Action Plans that identify the key barriers to walking and
biking and then prioritizes strategies to address these barriers. The SRTS coordinator is
beginning Action Plan work with four elementary schools this winter, with the goal to focus
on the action plans at the additional four schools over the next year. The Action Plan is the
key document that outlines the encouragement, education, engineering, and enforcement
strategies, and essentially shapes the SRTS program for each school moving forward.
The Tigard SRTS Program has made great strides in a few short months. However, there is
much more work to be done. Implementation of the school Action Plans will require
additional project funding and a re-prioritization of potential projects around schools. Shifting
transportation mode rates will take time. Therefore, the SRTS coordinator must work to find a
way to create self-sustaining programs at each school that continue to support safe and active
transportation for students.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
N/A
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
Strategic Plan:
Goal 1. Facilitate walking connections to develop an identity
Goal 3. Engage the community through dynamic communication
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
N/A
Attachments
SRTS_Update
City
ofn Tigard
Respect and Care | Do the Right Thing | Get it Done
City
ofn Tigard
Respect and Care | Do the Right Thing | Get it Done
Presented to City Council
November 17, 2015
City of Tigard
Safe
Routes to
School
Program
City of Tigard
Programs
City of Tigard
Police
Tigard Library
Tigard-
Tualatin
School District
Schools
(Parents,
Principals, &
Students)
Bicycle
Transportation
Alliance
SRTS National
Partnership
WashCo BTC
Collaboration
&
Partnerships
City of Tigard
What is Safe Routes to School?
City of Tigard
Program Goals
1.Reduce the number of driving trips to schools.
2.Educate families about the benefits of transportation.
3.Improve traffic safety and circulation around the schools.
4.Identify champions to build the program and sustain
activities.
City of Tigard
What have we done so far?
Engagement and Encouragement
Meeting with principals
Back-to-School Nights
Walk & Bike to School Day
Data Collection
Mapping
City of Tigard
City of Tigard
City of Tigard
Concerns for Elementary School Parents
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Total
Distance
Convenience of Driving
Time
Child's Participation in After School Programs
Speed of Traffic Along Route
Amount of Traffic Along Route
Adults to Bike/Walk With
Sidewalks or Pathways
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Crossing Guards
Violence or Crime
Weather or climate
City of Tigard
Templeton – How Students Travel to School by
Distance
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Less than
1/4 mile
1/4 mile up
to 1/2 mile
1/2 mile up
to 1 mile
1 mile up to
2 miles
More than 2
miles
Don't know (blank)
Bike
Family Vehicle (only children in your family)
School Bus
Walk
City of Tigard
Templeton Elementary Mode Split
Walk
7%
Bike
1%
School Bus
53%
Vehicle
33%
Carpool
4%
Transit
0%
Other
2%
City of Tigard
Tigard Middle School Mode Split
Walk
13%
Bike
4%
School bus
62%
Parents drive you
17%
Carpool (children
from other
families)
1%
Other (skateboard, scooter,
inline skates, etc.)
1%
(blank)
2%
City of Tigard
Collaboration with City Programs
Safe Routes
to School
Coordinator
Sidewalk
Gap Program
Metzger
School Park
Walk
Friendly
Communities
City of Tigard
Safe
Routes to
School
Program
City of Tigard
Programs
City of Tigard
Police
Tigard Library
Tigard-
Tualatin
School District
Schools
(Parents,
Principals, &
Students)
Bicycle
Transportation
Alliance
SRTS National
Partnership
WashCo BTC
Collaboration &
Partnerships
City of Tigard
School Progress Report
City of Tigard
What’s to come?
Student Education
Jump Start Bike Education
School Improvement and Action Plans
Develop school specific action plans, including engineering
solutions.
School Task Forces
Build a sustainable, integrated program in each school
Continue Encouragement and Engagement and much
more!
City of Tigard
Obstacles for Tigard SRTS Program
Behavior Change Building a Self-
Sustaining Program
Frustration with Slow
Change
School Capacity Funding for projects
City of Tigard
How can City Council help?
Participate in events
Representative on SRTS Committee
Support and funding for projects
Future school siting policies
City of Tigard
How do we move forward?
•Grant opportunities
•Lighter, quicker, cheaper
•Integrating projects into existing CIP process
Funding for projects
•More partnerships – parents, nonprofits, health orgs.
•District-wide programming
•Integrate into existing programs
School Capacity
•Tigard Strategic Plan – walkability focus for all Tigard citizens
•Infrastructure improvements Behavior Change
•Form a SRTS Task Force at each school
•Action Plan implementation
Building a Self-
Sustaining Program
•Find smaller, but meaningful projects to get done in the short -
term
•Continued outreach, communication about process
Frustration with Slow
Change
City of Tigard
Questions?
Tigard Safe Routes to School Coordinator:
Liz Hormann
lizh@tigard-or.gov
503-718-2708
AIS-2325 5.
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date:11/17/2015
Length (in minutes):40 Minutes
Agenda Title:Continued Discussion on the Sidewalk Gap Program
Prepared For: Toby LaFrance
Submitted By:Carissa Collins, Finance and Information Services
Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct
Staff
Meeting Type: Council
Workshop
Mtg.
Public Hearing
Newspaper Legal Ad Required?:
No
Public Hearing Publication
Date in Newspaper:
Information
ISSUE
At the workshop on October 20, 2015, council provided direction to staff for
the development of a citywide Sidewalk Gap Program. This Workshop will provide the
results of that direction and seek direction on next steps.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
What does council propose that staff present at the December 8, 2015 public hearing?
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Staff revised the scope of the sidewalk gap program that was discussed at the October 20,
2015 council workshop. Requested components that were incorporated into the program
include the addition of:
Arterials - a high capacity urban road such as Durham Road or Hall Boulevard.
Collectors - a medium capacity local road such as Burnham St., or
Neighborhood Routes - a local side street with 1500 or more average daily trips (ADT)
or near a school such as routes on Watkins Avenue and Park Street.
Trails-Off street paved or unpaved pathway such as the Fanno Creek Trail.
Per council request, staff focused on projecting costs for those streets and trails on the
above major classification road types.
The attached presentation:
Displays the revised maps of the sidewalk and trail gaps and the resulting system.
Outlines the process for costing the sidewalk gap program
Identifies potential funding sources
Calculates a potential utility bill charge that is modeled after the Street Maintenance Fee
and would fund the Sidewalk Gap Program over a 20 year period.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
Do not pursue a Sidewalk Gaps Program.
COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS
Strategic Plan and the Transportation System Plan.
DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION
10/20/2015
Fiscal Impact
Cost:$118,000,000
Budgeted (yes or no):No
Where Budgeted (department/program):CIP
Additional Fiscal Notes:
The estimated cost of the proposed Sidewalk Gap Program is $118 million. Please see
attached presentation for discussion of the program and potential funding sources.
Attachments
Sidewalk Gap Program Presentation
City of Tigard Respect and Care | Do the Right Thing | Get it DoneCity of Tigard Respect and Care | Do the Right Thing | Get it Done
Sidewalk Gap
Program
November 17, 2015
City of Tigard
Gaps in
pedestrian
facilities in Tigard
makes walking a
difficult
transportation
option thus
increasing traffic
on Tigard’s roads.Location of sidewalk and trail gaps in Tigard.
City of Tigard
Feedback from Oct 20, 2015
•Focus on primary routes in the system.
•Include difficult to build, high-cost gaps.
•Don’t include gaps on low traffic volume
local streets.
•Develop 20 year program.
City of Tigard
Primary System Routes
•Arterial Roads
•Collector Streets
•Neighborhood routes with average
daily traffic (ADT) volume over 1,500
or near a school.
•Trails
City of Tigard
Program Costing
•Costing is done at a high programmatic level.
•Actual costs of individual sections will vary.
•Recognizes that some sections can be
completed with lower cost paved
connections.
•Only includes sidewalk gaps within city
boundaries.
City of Tigard
Program Costing
•Estimates include sidewalks on both sides of
streets.
•Priority crossings included in the project
costs. Specific location will be determined in
the design process.
•Bike lanes included in costs for Arterials and
Collectors.
City of Tigard
Program Costing
•Trails are those identified in Trail Master
Plan, including neighborhood and multi-use
trails.
•Regional trails only include portions within
city boundaries.
City of Tigard
Program Costing
•A sidewalk/trail costs $250/linear foot.
•Identified 4 factors that increase cost:
City needs to buy right-of-way
Steep slopes
Wetlands
Drainage ditches
•Each cost factor adds $400/linear foot.
City of Tigard
Tigard’s
Arterial Roads
have 7.2 miles
of sidewalk
gaps. Filling
those gaps will
cost $27.6
million.
Location of arterial roads and their sidewalk gaps.
City of Tigard
Tigard’s
Collector
Streets have
6.3 miles of
sidewalk gaps.
Filling those
gaps will cost
$26.3 million.
Location of collector roads and their sidewalk gaps.
City of Tigard
Neighborhood
Routes with
traffic of over
1,500 trips/day
have 13.9 miles
of sidewalk
gaps. Filling
those gaps will
cost $38.8 mil.Location of neighborhood routes with ADT over 1,500 and their sidewalk
gaps.
City of Tigard
Tigard’s trails
have 6.7 miles
of gaps within
the city. Filling
those gaps will
cost $25.6
million.
Location of trail and their trail gaps.
City of Tigard
A complete
pedestrian
system with all 34
miles of system
gaps filled will
make walking a
more attractive
transportation
option. Creating
the system will
cost $118 million.Location of completed pedestrian system.
City of Tigard
Potential Program Funding
•Gas Tax Fund
•Current 3% City Gas Tax Fund
•Potential Additional 2% City Gas Tax
•Outside Funding Sources
•Potential Utility Bill Charge
City of Tigard
Gas Tax Fund
•Currently supports:
Street Maintenance
Electric bill for streetlights and signals
Debt service on Burnham St. thru FY 2020.
•Available Funds for all Transportation Needs:
Currently $200K undedicated annually .
Starting FY 2021, $790K available annually.
$10,240,000 over next 20 years.
City of Tigard
3% City Gas Tax Fund
•Currently supports:
Debt service on Greenburg/Main Intersection
thru FY 2020.
•Available Funds for all Transportation Needs:
Currently $200K undedicated annually .
Starting FY 2021, $510K available annually.
$5,760,000 over next 20 years.
Needs TTAC recommendation.
City of Tigard
Potential 2% City Gas Tax
•Would need to be implemented.
•Would generate $400K per year.
•Over a 20 year period, would generate
$8 Mil.
City of Tigard
Outside Funding
•Grants
•Large CIP projects including outside jurisdiction
funding, such as MSTIP
•Development
Thru development in an area where a gap exists
Thru reimbursement program in an area where Gap
Program has built the sidewalk prior to development.
•Estimate that 20% of Gap Program Funding will come
from Outside Funding.
City of Tigard
Utility Bill Charge
•Modeled on Street Maintenance Fee.
•Program has 20 year duration.
•Program Costs reduced by 20% funding from
outside sources.
•Other city resources not included. Would
represent another 20% program reduction if
all resources were applied to Sidewalk Gaps.
City of Tigard
Utility Bill Charge
Road Type Cost
($Mil)
Res
Share
Res Cost
($Mil)
Non-Res
Share
Non-Res
Cost ($Mil)
Arterial 27.6 38%10.5 62%17.1
Collector 26.3 50%13.2 50%13.2
Neighborhood 38.8 100%38.8 0%0.0
Trail 25.6 90%23.0 10%2.6
20-Yr Total 118.3 85.5 26.3
Calculation of 20-Year Program Cost by Customer Type
City of Tigard
Utility Bill Charge
Road Type Total Cost
($Mil)
Res Cost
($Mil)
Non-Res Cost
($Mil)
20-Yr Total 118.3 85.5 26.3
Less: 20% Outside
Funding
-23.7 -17.1 -6.6
20-Yr Total from Utility
Charge
94.7 68.4 26.3
Annual Cost 4.7 3.4 1.3
Calculation of Annual Program Cost Charged to Utility Bill by
Customer Type
City of Tigard
Utility Bill Charge
Road Type Total Cost Res Cost Non-Res Cost
Annual Cost $4.7 Mil $3.4 Mil $1.3 Mil
Units 20,813
Residences
39,723
Required Parking
Annual Cost Per Unit $164.28 $33.12
Monthly Utility Charge
per Unit
$13.69 $2.76
Calculation of Monthly Utility Bill Charge by Customer Type
City of Tigard
Summary
•Connected walkability will reduce traffic.
•Connecting pedestrian facilities on primary
routes will cost $118 million.
•Additional resources are needed to pay for
a Sidewalk Gap program.
•If a Utility Fee was used, a home would pay
about $14/month.
City of Tigard
Location of completed pedestrian system.
AIS-2167 6.
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date:11/17/2015
Length (in minutes):20 Minutes
Agenda Title:Economic Development Update
Submitted By:Lloyd Purdy, Community
Development
Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: Council
Workshop
Mtg.
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
This presentation updates council on the progress of economic development programs,
project and activities during the last half of calendar year 2015.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
No council action required
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Hunziker Industrial Core Public Infrastructure
In October 2015, the U.S. Department of Commerce updated its grant making process for
the Economic Development Administration’s Public Works and Economic Development
Assistance (EDA) grants. Staff expected this change and are working with the city's
Engineering Department to update the final draft of the City of Tigard’s proposal to align it
with the new application process.
This application asks for $3 million in federal funding to add public access, transportation,
sewer and water service to catalyze development and increase employment in the Hunziker
Industrial Core's 138 acres. Federal funding would be matched against the $1.5 million
appropriation from the State of Oregon, a contribution from industrial developer Trammell
Crow estimated to be $1.5 million, a donation of right-of-way from the Fields Trust estimated
at $1 million, and an estimated $3 million of planned City of Tigard CIP projects for water and
sewer utilities.
The City of Tigard’s proposal has been reviewed by an internal team of city staff, a team from
Greater Portland Inc, a team from CFM Strategic Communications and David Porter the
EDA’s local representative in Portland. After submission, it will be reviewed by the EDA’s
Seattle office and then a recommendation may be made to the EDA’s office in Washington
D.C. The proposal will compete against other proposals from the EDA’s Western Region. A
competitive application to the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development
Agency must explain how a project is:
Ready to start in the next 6 months1.
Can be completed by the applicant2.
Is consistent with EDA investment priorities3.
Has committed and available matching funds4.
Improves an area suffering from economic distress5.
Has an economic development impact on the whole region6.
Over the last two years, staff has been working to make this a competitive project,
beginning with the 2014 Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD)
funded Public Infrastructure Finance Strategy, which culminated in the recruitment of the
industrial development firm Trammell Crow. Securing $1.5 million in matching funds from
the State of Oregon’s Capital Construction funds was another critical step in this process.
More recently, the city’s Engineering Department developed a preliminary project scope and
cost estimates, as well as an RFP for project design. The preliminary engineering report that
details this infrastructure investment is included with this AIS.
Enterprise Zone
Currently, three firms are certified to participate in the Tigard Enterprise Zone. One
manufacturer moving into the city is in the process of making an application. When that
application is approved, the name of the firm will be shared with council.
In October, both the City of Tigard and the City of Lake Oswego resolved to amend the
enterprise zone to include the Southwest Employment Area in Lake Oswego. This expanded
zone will be called the Tigard/Lake Oswego Enterprise Zone. An Intergovernmental Agreement
(IGA) outlining the roles and responsibilities of each city is under final review by legal counsel
from both cities. The IGA will be presented to each city council before an application is made
to Business Oregon, the state’s economic development agency. Notifying Business Oregon of
the zone expansion is the last step in this process.
Business Roundtable
Every quarter, the city invites Tigard business leaders from a range of firms to participate in a
meeting to discuss local and regional issues relevant to the business community. In
October, local firm Curtiss Wright/Williams Controls hosted the meeting. This was the first
time the business roundtable was paired with a site tour of a production facility. This was the
most well attended meeting of the year. At least one Tigard business site tour will be
included as part of next year’s schedule of meetings if a firm is willing to host the group. The
next business roundtable will be in January 2016.
Tigard Downtown Alliance
Events - The Tigard Downtown Alliance grew this year’s Street Festival into the biggest
pop-up event in downtown Tigard’s history. More than 80 vendors participated. This is the
first year the Tigard Downtown Alliance was responsible for producing this event. The
first year the Tigard Downtown Alliance was responsible for producing this event. The
organization is seeking a chair person to begin planning the 2016 Street Festival.
The TDA is wrapping up the planning phase of the annual tree lighting ceremony at the north
end of Main Street, scheduled for Friday, December 4, 2015.
Art - On November 1, 2015 the Tigard Downtown Alliance installed a second piece of public
art called “Perch” at the corner of Burnham and Ash Streets. This piece was created by
sculptor Mike Suri. Property owner Mike Stevenson, owner of B&B Print Source, donated
the base and use of his property. The TDA is also commissioning artist Ben Dye to create a
cross-street banner hanging system that looks like a sculptural element. This project will
complete the requirements of the $50,000 Washington County Visitors Association grant
funded by the “bed tax.”
Organizing – The TDA is making progress on the nine performance measures they must
complete in order to be eligible for the $24,000 capacity building “challenge grant” from the
city.
Tigard’s Table
Work continues with local entrepreneurs in the food and beverage industry to explore ways to
grow this sector of the Tigard economy. One team met to discuss a food based business
incubator. A second team is forming around the idea of a new food-themed festival in
Tigard. Staff have also initiated a series of field trips to resources around the region that
exemplify innovative and entrepreneurial approaches to cultivating food and beverage
entrepreneurs. Our first field trip will be to the Portland Mercado to investigate a hybrid food
innovation center and food cart pod.
Business Retention and Expansion
Business visits over the last couple of months include meetings with corporate leadership at
the following firms: Medline (moving to a new location on Hunziker Street), Biamp (expanding
from a location in Beaverton), High Impact Technology, Polycast, Agilyx, and Apex Labs. These
meetings are an opportunity to talk to corporate executives about local and state programs
that help them grow their businesses. Future business visits will include food and beverage
entrepreneurs.
Staff also collaborated with the Tigard-Tualatin School District (TTSD) as they prepare and
compete for a state grant to establish a new Manufacturing Program of Study (MPOS) at Tigard
and Tualatin High Schools. As proposed, the study program will be jointly developed with
local industry partners who are experiencing a workforce shortage, as well as Portland
Community College (PCC), a regional STEM Hub, municipal and non-profit partners. If
funded, students in the manufacturing pathway will participate in work readiness activities, job
shadows, and internships coordinated by local workforce development partner Worksystems.
Students will also have additional extracurricular opportunities to investigate manufacturing
and related careers through Skills USA, a career and technical student organization.
The two Tigard firms that participated in Manufacturing Day on October 2, Fought &
Company and Polycast, exemplify the type of manufacturing firms in Tigard that need
students interested in a Manufacturing Program of Study.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
No action required
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
The projects and programs outlined in this update are consistent with the City of Tigard’s
Comprehensive Plan Goal 9 and the 2011 Economic Opportunity Analysis. This work also
supports the City’s Strategic Vision Goal 2, Objectives one and two that help “ensure
development advances the vision” of a more walkable, interconnected and healthier city.
Strategic Vision Goal 2, Objective 1:
Make best use of undeveloped and underdeveloped land to increase the value of the city.
Strategic Vision Goal 2, Objective 2:
Market Tigard, build a healthy business climate that attracts, serves and employs more Tigard
residents.
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
March 24, 2015 Economic Development Update
July 21, 2015 Economic Development Update
September 8, 2015 Update from GPI
September 22, 2015 US Department of Commerce EDA grant
October 27, 2015 Enterprise Zone Expansion
Attachments
Proposed EDA Project Details
Preliminary Engineering Report
Hunziker Industrial Core
Infrastructure Improvements
Tigard, Oregon
2012 Aerial photo of the 138 industrial zoned acres in Tigard’s Hunziker Industrial Core.
Prepared by:
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
September 3, 2015
Hunziker Industrial Core Infrastructure
EDA Preliminary Engineering Report 1 September 3, 2015
CONTENTS:
Description of Project Components…………………………….……...……………2
EDA Statement……………………………………………………………………..3
Feasibility Analysis…………………………………………………………………..3
Construction Methods………………………………………………………………4
Construction Contracts……………………………………………………………...4
Construction Cost Estimates………………………………………………………..4
Real Property Acquisition…………………………………………………………...5
Permits……………………………………………………………………………...5
Project Schedule…………………………………………………………………….5
APPENDIX:
Detailed Construction Cost Estimate
Existing Conditions Map – Figure 1
Project Component Map – Figure 2 through Figure 6
Hunziker Industrial Core Infrastructure
EDA Preliminary Engineering Report 2 September 3, 2015
1.Description of Project Components
Tigard estimates a $10.1 million investment in public infrastructure will catalyze an immediate private sector
investment of more than $22 million, at least 250,000 square feet in new industrial development and space
for 150 - 300 new jobs. New public infrastructure will set the foundation for the Hunziker Industrial Core’s
evolution into a mixed use employment center that supports a wider range of businesses and higher levels of
employment. This will be reinforced by a future high capacity transit (light rail) alignment proposed to run
adjacent to these employment lands which will deliver employees from around the Portland region to this
commercial/industrial district.
Tigard’s Hunziker Industrial Core, shown in context of
surrounding development in aerial photo, includes 138
acres of industrial zoned property located ¾ of a mile from
HWY 217 and I-5 in the southwest quadrant of the
Portland metropolitan region. It is immediately accessible
by active rail service. The area developed originally as
warehousing and distribution facilities to serve regional
demand. Currently, 36 firms access the area off of Hunziker
Road. Ninety-six acres are developed but underutilized.
More than forty-two acres are undeveloped and limited by
insufficient or nonexistent public infrastructure and access.
The proposed public infrastructure project components
consist of the following:
Wall Street Improvements
Wall Street will be constructed from Hunziker Road to the Tech Center Drive with more than 3,400
linear feet of new public road. The paved width will be 46 feet with curb and gutter, 5 foot sidewalks
on each side, bike lanes and storm water planter areas for water quality treatment within a 70 foot right-
of-way. Within the new road alignment, an 8” sewer, 12” waterline and an 18” storm line will be
placed to serve the area, making this industrial collector a complete street with multi modal travel
options. Alignment included as exhibit in this report.
Waterline Improvements
A new 12” waterline will be constructed to replace an aging 12” waterline that is currently located
beneath and adjacent to Rock Creek. The replacement will result in improved accessibility for
maintenance and provide long term water supply to the area. This will create a looped connection that
will provide adequate fire flow protection and meet the water demands for the future development in the
Hunziker Industrial Core. Alignment included as exhibit in this report.
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
A new 15” sanitary sewer will replace an undersized 12” sanitary sewer that is currently located
beneath and adjacent to Rock Creek. A new 10” sanitary sewer will connect to the new 15” line
and will connect into the new sanitary sewer system in Wall Street. The new sewer will prevent
overflows, improve access for routine maintenance and will provide service to a portion of the
undeveloped parcels in the Hunziker Industrial Core. Alignment included as exhibit in this report.
Hunziker Industrial Core Infrastructure
EDA Preliminary Engineering Report 3 September 3, 2015
2. Statement verifying the project components described in the engineering report are
consistent with the EDA investment project description.
The project components described in this engineering report are consistent with the EDA investment project
description provided in Section A.2 of Form ED-900.
3. Sketches of the schematics showing the general layout and location of the existing
site conditions and the project components.
See attached schematics showing existing conditions and project components.
4. Feasibility Analysis
The existing conditions along the first ½ mile of the proposed Wall Street alignment includes private access
to commercial properties, a private railroad spur with crossing easements and more than 40 acres of
undeveloped industrial zoned property. The existing ground slope along this alignment is fairly flat with only
a couple foot elevation change as it slopes from southwest to northeast. A short retaining wall will need to be
placed along a portion of the east side of the alignment due to the existing slope in the east to west direction.
With the construction of Wall Street the existing railroad spur will be removed to accommodate the new
alignment. The existing private access will also be replaced by the new public roadway since current drives
are not constructed to the City’s public street standards.
The existing conditions along the final ¼ mile of proposed alignment include a dirt road, a concrete
foundation that is remains of a former warehouse and a hillside. The ground along the alignment raises
approximately 12’ from the transition from Wall Street and back down approximately 12’ as it reaches the
existing terminus of Tech Center Drive. The existing concrete foundation and five existing concrete
partition walls associated with the former warehouse will be removed to allow for the placement of the new
Hunziker Industrial Core Infrastructure
EDA Preliminary Engineering Report 4 September 3, 2015
road alignment. Along the north side of the alignment, the existing ground can slope upwards at slopes
near 50%. Retaining walls will need to be constructed adjacent to these areas.
The existing conditions along the new water line and sanitary sewer alignment include parking lot areas on
city property and vegetated areas along Red Rock Creek. The new 12” waterline will be constructed with a
standard 3 feet of cover in a typical utility trench and the 15” sanitary sewer line will be constructed with
varying depths of cover in a typical utility trench.
In reviewing the proposed alignments and existing conditions, the project is feasible using standard
construction methods and materials.
5. Construction Methods
The construction process will be design-bid-build for this project. The construction procurement will be done
through competitive bid process. Proposers are required to certify non-discrimination in employment
practices, and identify resident status as defined in ORS 279A.120. Pre-qualification of proposers is not
required. All proposers are required to comply with the provisions of Oregon Revised Statutes and Local
Contract Review Board (LCRB) Policy. The contract is awarded to the qualified low bidder.
Construction management for all project components will be performed by the City of Tigard’s engineering
and construction inspection departments.
6. Construction Contracts
The number of construction contracts anticipated will be three. One contract will be for the Wall St & Tech
Center Street Improvements and one each for the sanitary sewer and water line construction that is adjacent
to Red Rock Creek. The City will issue a construction RFP and will award the bid to one contractor for each
contract. The awarded contractor may hire additional specialty contractors to complete work such as
concrete finish work for sidewalks, installing retaining walls or placing the electrical work needed for street
lighting. The subcontractors will contract directly with the awarded contractor.
7. Construction Cost Estimates
See appendix for detailed Engineer’s Construction Cost Estimate for the various project components. The
summary of the estimate is:
Wall Street Road Alignment $7,055,126
Waterline Improvements $1,712,000
Sanitary Sewer Improvements $1,326,000
Total Project $10,093,126
Hunziker Industrial Core Infrastructure
EDA Preliminary Engineering Report 5 September 3, 2015
8.Real Property Acquisition
A fair market proposal will be completed by a certified appraiser for right-of-way acquisition needed for Wall
Street including the 175,000 square feet that will be donated by the property owner. That cost has been
included in the estimated numbers above. No property needs to be acquired for the water line and sewer
upgrade. The City will follow its standard practice for property acquisition. Costs shown in the attached cost
estimates are based on comparable land costs within the City.
9.Permits
List below includes all permits required for the proposed project and their current status:
City of Tigard Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit – Permit is issued by the City for any public utilities,
grading and work within the right-of-way.
Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter (SPL) – Clean Water Services will conduct environmental
review of project and issued SPL stating construction conditions.
Division of State Lands Wetlands/Waterways Removal-Fill Permit – Permit required to fill existing
wetlands if delineated within site. A wetland delineation will take place for determination.
Army Corps of Engineers Fill Permit – Permit required to fill existing wetlands as required.
Oregon DEQ 1200-C Permit – Oregon DEQ administers the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System permit. This permit regulates stormwater runoff to surface waters from construction activities.
10.Project Schedule
An overall estimate project schedule is:
Preliminary
Planning and Predesign September, 2015
RFP – Consultant Design Services October, 2015
Project
Hire Consultants December, 2015
Survey & Geotechnical Report February, 2015
30% Design March, 2015
60% Design June, 2015
90% Design August, 2015
Final Design September, 2016
Permits (PFI, CWS, DSL, Corps) October, 2016
Request for Proposal – Construction Services October, 2016
Bid and Award December, 2016
Begin Construction January, 2017
End Construction and Project Closeout August, 2017
SECTION COUNTY
PROJECT NUMBER KIND OF WORK LENGTH DATE Prepared by:
Water, Sewer, Grading, Drainage, Paving, Signing,
Illumination, and Roadside Development 1,730 10/5/2015
ITEM NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT AMOUNT UNIT COST TOTAL
TEMPORARY FEATURES AND APPURTENANCES TOTAL FOR GROUP $347,404.85
MOBILIZATION LS All 5.5% Biddable 301,080$
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 4 1,300$ 5,200$
SEDIMENT FENCE, UNSUPPORTED FOOT 8,150 2.50$ 20,375$
INLET PROTECTION EACH 20 75.00$ 1,500$
POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN LS All 3,500.00$ 3,500$
TEMPORARY 5 FOOT ORANGE PROTECTIVE FENCE FOOT 3,500 4.50$ 15,750$
ROADWORK TOTAL FOR GROUP $407,375.00
REMOVAL OF RAILROAD SPUR LS All 20,250$ 20,250$
CLEARING AND GRUBBING ACRE 6.50 10,000$ 65,000$
GENERAL EXCAVATION CUYD 8,050 30.00$ 241,500$
GENERAL EMBANKMENT CUYD 5,375 15.00$ 80,625$
DRAINAGE AND SEWERS TOTAL FOR GROUP $1,531,000.00
8 INCH SANITARY SEWER PIPE, 5 FT DEPTH LF 2,130 85.00$ 181,050$
10 INCH SANITARY SEWER PIPE, 5 FT DEPTH LF 410 90.00$ 36,900$
15 INCH SANITARY SEWER PIPE, 5 FT DEPTH LF 1,570 105.00$ 164,850$
10 INCH STORM PIPE, 5 FT DEPTH LF 415 75.00$ 31,125$
18 INCH STORM PIPE, 5 FT DEPTH LF 2,535 85.00$ 215,475$
CONCRETE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES EACH 17 4,000.00$ 68,000$
CONCRETE STORM SEWER MANHOLES EACH 10 3,500.00$ 35,000$
CONCRETE MANHOLES, WATER QUALITY EACH 2 12,000.00$ 24,000$
CONCRETE INLETS, TYPE CG-30 EACH 16 1,800.00$ 28,800$
RIPRAP PAD EACH 1 800.00$ 800$
CONNECTION TO EXISTING STRUCTURES EACH 3 1,000.00$ 3,000$
ABANDONEMENT/REMOVAL OF EXISTING SANITARY LINE LS 1 730,000.00$ 730,000$
TESTING LS 1 12,000.00$ 12,000$
RETAINING WALL TOTAL FOR GROUP $444,000.00
RETAINING WALL, MSE SQFT 14,800 30.00$ 444,000$
BASES TOTAL FOR GROUP $145,700.00
1 1/2" AGGREGATE BASE (10")CUYD 4,250 30.00$ 127,500$
3/4" AGGREGATE BASE (2")CUYD 650 28.00$ 18,200$
WEARING SURFACES TOTAL FOR GROUP $621,390.00
LEVEL 3, 1/2 INCH DENSE HMAC, 4" THICKNESS TON 3,420 90.00$ 307,800$
CONCRETE CURBS, CURB AND GUTTER LF 6,780 24.00$ 162,720$
CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS SQFT 1,800 7.00$ 12,600$
CONCRETE WALKS SQFT 25,140 5.50$ 138,270$
PERMANENT TRAFFIC CONTROL AND GUIDANCE DEVICES TOTAL FOR GROUP $30,000.00
SIGNING & STRIPING LS 1 30,000.00$ 30,000$
PERMANENT TRAFFIC CONTROL AND ILLUMINATION SYSTEMS TOTAL FOR GROUP $287,000.00
LIGHT POLES EACH 82 3,500.00$ 287,000$
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEVELOPMENT AND CONTROL TOTAL FOR GROUP $320,000.00
WATER QUALITY FACILITY INC. PLANTING/LANDSCAPING LS 1 320,000$ 320,000$
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM TOTAL FOR GROUP $1,309,804.00
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS LS 1 12,000$ 12,000$
12 INCH DI WATER LF 4,395 85.00$ 373,575$
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
September 28, 2015
Hunziker Core Infrastructure Improvements Washington
COT
\\TIGDEPT\Tigdept\Community Development\Economic Development\Ec Dev Projects Lloyd\2015 Funding Requests Hunziker Core\EDA Hunziker
Core\EDA Support Material\For Proposal Assmebly\Prelim Eng Report\Estimate.xlsx
8:49 AM 10/5/2015
Page 1 of 2
SECTION COUNTY
PROJECT NUMBER KIND OF WORK LENGTH DATE Prepared by:
Water, Sewer, Grading, Drainage, Paving, Signing,
Illumination, and Roadside Development 1,730 10/5/2015
ITEM NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT AMOUNT UNIT COST TOTAL
September 28, 2015
Hunziker Core Infrastructure Improvements Washington
COT
8 INCH DI WATER LF 850 75.00$ 63,750$
6 INCH DI WATER LF 120 70.00$ 8,400$
CONNECTION EXISTING MAIN EACH 5 1,500$ 7,500$
VAC/AIR ASSEMBLY EACH 4 1,600$ 6,400$
FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EACH 7 3,800$ 26,600$
6 INCH GATE VALVE EACH 14 1,000$ 14,000$
8" DOUBLE CHECK VAULT EACH 1 24,000$ 24,000$
12 INCH BUTTERFLY VALVE EACH 14 2,200$ 30,800$
2 INCH WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS EACH 4 2,500$ 10,000$
ABANDONEMENT/REMOVAL OF EXISTING WATERLINE LS 1 723,279$ 723,279$
TESTING EACH 1 9,500$ 9,500$
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING TOTAL FOR GROUP $331,585.00
UTILITY VAULT, TYPE FRONTIER 3'x5' HAND HOLE EACH 8 2,920$ 23,360$
UTILITY VAULT, TYPE PGE 233 EACH 8 1,530$ 12,240$
UTILITY VAULT, TYPE PGE 577 EACH 8 5,400$ 43,200$
UTILITY VAULT, TYPE PGE 5106 EACH 4 8,700$ 34,800$
UTILITY VAULT, TYPE COMCAST 233 EACH 8 1,285$ 10,280$
UTILITY CONDUIT, 2" DIAM.LF 6,810 3.00 20,430$
UTILITY CONDUIT, 4" DIAM.LF 3,405 4.00 13,620$
UTILITY CONDUIT, 6" DIAM.LF 3,405 5.00 17,025$
UTILITY TRENCH EXCAVATION, BEDDING, AND BACKFILL LF 3,405 46.00$ 156,630$
5,775,259$
15%866,289$
25%1,443,815$
RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS (217,257 SF x $9.20/SF)1,998,764$
PERMIT FEES
Erosion Control Fee 9,000$
10,093,126$ ESTIMATED TOTAL
SOFT COSTS
SUBTOTAL, BIDDABLE ITEMS
CONTINGENCIES
\\TIGDEPT\Tigdept\Community Development\Economic Development\Ec Dev Projects Lloyd\2015 Funding Requests Hunziker Core\EDA Hunziker
Core\EDA Support Material\For Proposal Assmebly\Prelim Eng Report\Estimate.xlsx
8:49 AM 10/5/2015
Page 2 of 2