The URL can be used to link to this page

08/07/2006 - Packet • AGENDA TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION • E AUGUST 7, 2006 7:00 p.m. . . - TIGARD CIVIC CENTER- RED ROCK CREEK CONFERENCE ROOM 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD T I GARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS 4. APPROVE MINUTES 5. TIGARD AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM 6. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN - OTAK 7. OTHER BUSINESS 8. ADJOURNMENT Tigard Planning Commission - Roll Call Hearing Date: 2 - 7- o Starting Time: rf : dD COMMISSIONERS: Jodie Inman (President) 7' Mitchell Brown Gretchen Buehner Rex Caffall Patrick Harbison Kathy Meads Judy Munro (Vice-President) David Walsh Jeremy Vermilyea (alternate) STAFF PRESENT: Dick Bewersdorff Tom Coffee Gary Page nstecher Barbara Shields Cheryl Caines ,/ Denver Igarta EmilyEng 'Duane Roberts Kim McMillan - Beth St. Amand Gus Duenas Phil Nachbar Sean Farrelly • • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes August 7,2006 1. CALL TO ORDER Vice-President Munro called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center,Red Rock Creek Conference Room,at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Vice-President Munro;Commissioners Brown,Buehner,Meads,and Walsh. Also present was Jeremy Vermilyea,Commission alternate. Commissioners Absent: President Inman; Commissioners Caffall and Harbison Staff Present: Tom Coffee, Community Development Director;Duane Roberts,Associate Planner,Denver Igarta,Associate Planner,Jerre Lewis,Planning Commission Secretary 3. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS Community Development Director Tom Coffee updated the Commission on the Bull Mountain incorporation effort and the Cach Creek annexation by the City which will be heard by Council on September 26th (Exhibit A). Coffee advised that the annexation maybe appealed. Mitch Brown volunteered to serve on the Committee for Citizen Involvement. There were no other committee reports. 4. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES It was moved and seconded to approve the July 17,2006 meeting minutes as submitted. The motion passed by a vote of 4-0. Commissioner Munro abstained. It was moved and seconded to approve the July 31,2006 meeting minutes as submitted. The motion passed by a vote of 4-0. Commissioner Walsh abstained. 6. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN - OTAK This item was taken out of order. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 7,2006—Page 1 • • Associate Planner Denver Igarta provided background on the Downtown Improvement Plan which was completed in September 2005 and lays forth provisions for the next 20-30 years in the Downtown area. The plan identifies 8 catalyst projects that will help spur redevelopment in the Downtown. The first project is to enhance the streetscape. The plan was approved by Council and OTAK was subsequently selected as the consultant for the streetscape design plan. A citizen working group participated as an advisory committee to the process and helped to develop a draft streetscape design plan. Tom Litster from OTAK gave a PowerPoint presentation on the draft Downtown Streetscape Plan (Exhibit B). The final report will be presented to Council in September. The plan maintains certain ideas for the Downtown area: urban village, green heart, and sustainability. Litster showed Downtown framework plan that was developed and explained the unifying elements included in the plan. There are a range of choices with enough similarity to give a sense of wholeness to the Downtown area. He described the different themes for functional design,green heart, and artistic representation. The key elements of functional design are safety,comfort, and access. The green heart theme relates to trees,landscaping, connections to public spaces and Fanno Creek, sustainability, and public art. Artistic representations are things that relate to style or historic period. The preferred style chosen by the Downtown Streetscape Working Group is mostly classical,however,there maybe places where some contemporary art might be considered. There was also a lot of support for naturalistic styles,particularly around Fanno Creek and the gateways to Downtown. Litster detailed the recommended street design concepts for the Downtown area: Main Street (village street),Burnham Street (green street), and West Commercial Street (gateway street). A green street is not only green visually,it uses mitigated storm water management techniques. Litster described some of the techniques that could be used on Burnham Street. There are Metro funds available for green street projects that the City could apply for. Lisa Olsen,former member of the Downtown Task Force and the Downtown Streetscape Working Group, noted that going through the streetscape plan process was interesting and educational. She is anxious to see the final report. Vice-President Munro asked what the Planning Commission's role was for this meeting. Staff advised that the purpose of the discussion was mainly to let Commission know what is going on,but they are also welcome to make recommendations. Vice-President Munro asked about the lighting at the commuter rail station. Staff advised that the commuter rail lighting will be different from the lighting Downtown, but will be PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 7,2006—Page 2 • • • compatible. The lighting in the Downtown area functions better for pedestrians;the rail station lighting functions better for traffic. The fixtures don't have to be exact as long as there is consistency in appearance. There will still be "shoe box" lighting in the parking area and it is anticipated that as plantings grow,they will detract from the lights. It was also noted that the original design of the train station was changed by TriMet, but the City Council approved $100,000 to provide a more traditional look for the station. 5. TIGARD AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM Senior Planner Duane Roberts reported on Tigard's affordable housing program. He provided handouts (Exhibits GF). The definition of affordable housing is housing that costs no more than 30% of gross income for rent and utilities. For homeowners,the costs include mortgage, insurance, and taxes. In the Metro area, the focus of programs is on the 50% of median group. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs are based on the 80% of median group - to be eligible,projects must benefit a population that's at least 51% low to moderate income. Tom Coffee advised that the CDBG program came into being during the Nixon era. The Federal government decided to let states and communities choose where to spend the funds. In Washington County, cities with a population under 50,000 have to compete for funds. Cities over 50,000 have a formula-based entitlement. Roberts noted that there is an imbalance between household income and housing prices (Exhibit E) in the Portland Metro region. There is also the trend of more high-end housing development and mobile home parks are disappearing. As a result, many residents are being priced out of neighborhoods. This is particularly true in Washington County. Metro developed policies that apply to affordable housing, encouraging a mix of affordable housing types dispersed within the region. Jurisdictions were required to address a comprehensive tool kit of strategies (density bonus, replacement housing, transfer development rights). Each local jurisdiction was required to formally consider and take action on each of the strategies. The other mandatory provision was to provide an annual progress report for 3 years. Most jurisdictions failed to meet the requirements. Tigard was one of the few jurisdictions that complied. Metro adopted another plan this year that is similar, but not mandatory. It's designed to reduce barriers to the affordable housing supply. The focus is on workforce, elderly, and disabled housing. They recommend that the affordable housing supply be integrated into all policy-making funding allocations, a new regional funding source be developed for affordable housing production, removing regulatory barriers, and providing technical assistance to governments. In recent years,Washington County established the Washington County Housing Fund. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 7,2006—Page 3 • This is a trust fund with the intention of soliciting official government and private contributions to provide grants and loans for affordable housing development. So far,they have collected $900,000 and have begun to distribute funds. Roberts reviewed the affordable housing action plan for Tigard - land use &non-land use measures (Exhibit G). He advised that the City has been providing affordable housing tax abatements for 10 years. The City allows adjustments to parking requirements for affordable housing projects and has a budget set-aside to offset fees and charges imposed on affordable housing development and rehabilitation. The current year fund amount is $10,000. Tigard has implemented a Housing Maintenance Program intended to ensure safe and sanitary housing within the community. The program also helps to maintain existing affordable housing stock. The program receives about 200 complaints a year. Roberts advised that the City also applies for grants to finance needed public improvements serving low income neighborhoods and housing projects. Over the past 10 years,the City has applied for and received $850,000 in grant funds to improve roads, sidewalks, and storm drainage serving low income housing projects and neighborhoods. Commissioner Buehner noted that the subject of affordable housing has been discussed at CCAC meetings. They are looking at mixed use projects with commercial and residential uses combined. She wonders if affordable housing would be possible, or would the commercial zone cause a problem. Tom Coffee said there is some interest in affordable housing in the Downtown area. He said the trick is that,typically, it's a commercial developer who is first interested in the Downtown- it's hard to get housing in first. Commercial developers aren't that interested in putting in affordable housing, unless the City is assisting somehow. Roberts advised that Community Partners for Affordable Housing is very interested in developing an elderly project in the Downtown area. He assumes the City would be supportive to an affordable housing project in Downtown Tigard. Commissioner Walsh asked what staff foresees for growth of affordable housing outside of a mixed use area. Staff answered that most zoning outside a mixed used area is single family. Affordable housing providers say they have to build at R-25 density. Most of the R-25 areas in Tigard are already built out- all that is left is redevelopment refill. Tom Coffee thinks 99W is overly zoned for commercial and underdeveloped in terms of real profit for the property owners. Commercial property owners would have to be convinced that there's more money in housing along 99W. This would also mean creating an environment for housing. It would be a long-term project. Commissioner Buehner said the area between Greenburg Road and Commercial Street on the other side of 99W is full of housing that was built at the end of WWII. As part of the Comp Plan update process, she would like the City to look at rezoning that area to make it attractive for redevelopment. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 7,2006—Page 4 • • 7. OTHER BUSINESS None 8. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:38 p.m. • Jerre- - • ' ,Planning Co sion Secretary A I F T: Vice-President Judy Munro • PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 7,2006—Page 5 • • )(h%h;-� 14 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, 41 IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDFD TO THE PURCHASER S T,I'CrA`RD�' PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, AT A MEETING ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2006 AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD,TIGARD,OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 2006-00002 FILE TITLE: CACH CREEK AREA ANNEXATION APPLICANT/ COORDINATOR City of Tigard OWNER: City of Tigard (Multiple Contact: Beth St.Amand Contact Dennis Koellermeier applicants): 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Tigard Water District OWNER: Trust for Public Land PO Box 23000 806 SW Broadway, #300 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97205 OWNER: Brentwood Homes OWNER: Jon Dyer Contact:John Noffz PO Box 848 15170 SW Finis Lane Lake Oswego, OR 97304 Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting annexation of twelve (12) parcels containing 41.41 acres into the City of Tigard. LOCATION: Abutting and west of Sunrise Lane, and abutting and north of SW Bull Mountain Road, including the right-of-way on Sunrise Lane, from the intersection of Sunrise Lane and SW 147th Terrace westerly for approximately 1,200 feet and northerly for approximately 1,630 feet; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. (WCTM) 2S105DB, Tax Lots 6100, 6200&400; WCTM 2S105CD,Tax Lot 100;WCTM 2S108AB, Tax Lots 1200 & 1201;WCTM 2S105DC, Tax Lots 100, 200,300&400;and WCTM 2S105DD,Tax Lots 200&300. ZONE: R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: The approval standards for annexations are described in Community Development Code Chapters 18.320 and 18.390, Comprehensive Plan Policies 2 and 10; ORS Chapter 222; and Metro Code Chapter 3.09. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MA ITER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. • ! ASSISTIVE LIS 1 E.NING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 503-639-4171,EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR 503-684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRIl'1•EN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER,OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING,AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE CITY COUNCIL MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION,OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LIS TED. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FTT.F ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. IF YOU WANT TO INSPECT THE FILE, PLEASE CALL AND MAKE AN APPOINTMENT WITH EITHER THE PROJECT PLANNER OR THE PLANNING TECHNICIANS. AT LEAST F1FI EEN (15) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING,A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECORDER OR STAFF PLANNER, EMILY ENG AT 503-639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, OR BY EMAIL TO F_mil a7 i�' _ar, dv . ? ! 1 ; -I-7T i i l ) i I I"i' e_��i- t7='_LtLu) iy.A i iii j_1~. I�.'!_ = , Ii ; --- --:-_ ._—I i i ; 1 ! i l ``, ,7-/ -r-- - ,,------ 1 I ; , . ; 1 , . ; �yi ±.H '':.'1 r- __ °.� r ,'L-L J. % Cach Creek Area 1J� !_!_ �'� ;i i -._._,., Annexation I _.I —I I -------- i I City of Tigard ' r %.xdP-=,.. 's.'" Oregon --1 r 1 - I_,i___:_ - n.-i-- -- l - - ---I ___"�I -_ ___ ---'��' --� r;Proposed - -- -_ -I T-- �'__`?i_�- L___1 Annexation Area 7 „J % \ a- �;,.y.: i G City of Tigard \ -1-�'I - a`•---, 1 ''--- Taxlot Boundary ■�•• Proposed 1 1`�- 'C_` ` '-_1 r—_.-;= \---- Annexation ---' — - o� -- '7 ._. Area , ' . � i i ! I G\ r —i -----I i — — ' .. isr• —fit\ -- D0\1\1(1tOWn • - gape ?Van Streets P\ann'mg Coneolissson • ota • Pugusl 7 , 2p06 Downtown Streetscape Design Plan • Catalyst Project • • Design Framework • Concept Plans • Near-Term and Long-Term Improvements 1 .:•• '.•• : .'..• '..:.::4::;.4iii:ii:li :::::;:.:i.ixiii<e:.::.:.::::::::: :.:..:...:..::........:...:...:...:. ::. : C... ...I.1.:::. :: : 1:11.. 7.1.;.;;I: I .4,,..... .. . ,. :::.:.::::::. N., :.:::::::: . :::....:.:: ....... .....:.. . ti) 44: .....,.., / : Cv It •a): / F : •0. • 11:4.4::: _..... .. E 01 ... _ /\1:‘ _ :::::::.:: ..,... ::::::!:::::: . tip) . ... ..• • • . . . x„, w„„ :::::.:.::::: > : i a ::::::::: \\''' i.,\. . ,„ :11.::::::.:11 ..... // g , ... : • . .. • E 0 4, : 0 •ei &I ....i. •7 •• .... ....:•.::: •.:.,...::::: :... 0. ONO. • 1:001.00 .4.) a C .::::::: I- •.:.:. ..as . 0). ....1::1 1(0) •• ... H D Cr) : 1 . . ,,, ,.,zf,,,,,;';..77,-\ From Vision to ff„,,, z z ��`J�f.+t a t'l� fs . �.fr. /� ; ,y rj ,t � � � 4 Construction• .t°�w j fsr£' 'a� 'i � k` $a ." �'4 s P e e i" C At �+'t` . +y'�F` :f iB i-. i -i Fh a a Ti 1i r ",y t fir ,,,y� `e�z.a'r 11 1 =kT}i.ga�rd��,ow�ntow�nl�;�p�o�uefr°i�,e� � Plan�T��l f a � �� -s ♦ �f',t�r�fsf �� r t �� ry'..17.1. 1 flf it it%� 4f ;p r4y yti ` riV'' rv�"b ea f 4"- s� '" y�r xv li �".� y ♦f 44:',. J e?� L� 2 SN6r� 'Ca tut�.`y I ?�.ltft - IQs :,ot, S, y'q,.»'�`'«•ff.2's .+�y r�� Y"� „T bf,7i.*_ "�i ', � �iri Li+ ,fign.e�"'�"� % '1,,,g. a, 4.�� ,1",.w r 4 ,a ,t'9a �r ,� x ,� ,tea =,... ..: „ �`z° i « $ �� Z . �.� ,it,';'sw*7 : irk s r* »y �(�a4 "r” ✓i p D capeg® i�gn Plan ,N„" M4 � *i Co o 4).c iA .s �h M 1 fit°' tilt* ik '' ‘ r''H ,P .:i`S'M Jam}�I1I�/t��(�C�Fy�{ I�\�\�!�I� 81111%2:4D)G5 Mf i A El d �W�n k g : ' • .; ...�Ai ,ae :„s public � �y 2: z t `.: ..,. S 1 li,°Cc�a-Wf°".AQC N 019n, 1,so4%. ;. >: , :"fit LA C i7C C07S� ' ' . ' „ ':y ,mss 1” , Y%o::"i>s.,, ... ' . - s:; _...�. .�.�.,...Vii, ._........_ .._ From Vision to Construction Downtown Streetscape Design Plan January - August 2006 Streetscape Working Group City Center Development Agency City Center Advisory Committee Public Open House • Transportation Analysis • Gateways and Public • Framework Planning Spaces Design • Street • Green Street Guidelines • • Conceptual Design • Phasing and Costs • Main, Burnham, and • Commuter Rail West Commercial Streets Station Improvements • Final Report AMI • ........... . 1::::::::::•:::•••::•:.:%.:.%•::::::::::::::::::::::::::... ''',;:`,..':'..,:•ii. ::::::.:.:: .•.'. :'.::::::.:::•:.:::!:: - ' '.:.:,::'..:*:: .0:::•::..:•:': ::::::::•:.: . .:....... .: ., :.......411Se:•.•'•:''•..•:•.• ••••.. "*,: , , :.:.:.:::•:': •',... ' '.... ' ' - ... . .... i:i:.:••••:.. .iiiiii;:':::..:.:::: .., , ':: .•::: •• ::::::::::• 0... ... :.: ....; - .. ... ' :- ........ ..-..... :: ,: ... . . .. . . :::::.,:. .•••.... .• .....! - .-.... -. -- .., " '' • :::::• • Iiiil.l••.• :: ,> „ • ::::: • ..• . ..: , ,,,, ,„ •.:•:.::''..:. . (1).. . ... :: , • ::::•:•.'• • ::•• .—; ' ....e.;.. „ ' • •.• .. • ... .. :I.::: •'•'•': •:. : . •::::::::••• 0:).• . . : :;:;:::::: :41,,,..,•• ,____ .. .: •• .• : :i .:.. ......• • •... . ::::.: • :::: ...........::: :::::::.. :: .....: ::•• :::•:.: . ...... ::::::••••=:••••:•:• ; :::.. • :::::::..... .... • : ,.. • :::::;•• . : ••• ...• :. „ . ::::.:•: • : .; ::::. ..• ::.:•:... . , :::::::: . • € :;•.:;••: .. „ :;:,.•• ' ' ri':•:.• ,... •::::::•• ...... , .... ''.. / ..., ._ :.: 1,:•:•..• , iii!:::::.• . 1::::..•. • . 1 :::::••: • 1 ' ." -• ..',:, • • - :i:•:::•• .'•••••.: .... ••••• ..... ....... .. .::::::::,.::. :.:.• .... . ., .• . • ' • • • ., . . . ... . . . . . . ... • ... . _. •• • . • • :::. .' ' .. . .. . . I:•. • ••.' . • I i.:':: • 1:!..::.:• ." ....• 1:!....• 0 :::::••• .. • '' :!•':,• .;: • . • , . , . . • ' 1::::::•:.. • . . . 'E.?.. • ' :1;:::::.•.... ::•', •• •:•::. .: •i•:•:::::':.:•::...::::: ::::•:.•• . ••••. :.•:.••• •.•: •••.'••:•::: . , ::•: . :'• :%....•:.:::............i.::.:.........:::•::::::.! I ' . . . . •... . • . .••.••• „, .. .. . . . .. ...• :::.:.•..•::::':::::::::;:::'::,.:•"• :• ::::1'.•..':.::.•:•,....:::..:.:•• :::. ;•;:;:;:;••::•:•:•:•:':•:':•:::::::•1•:::':•::.•.•...•.::. M ::::::::::.:::::.:.:::.:::::::: :::::*::::::.::::::::::.:::.2.:::.:.:1:::.:::::.:::..:.:.:.::. ark gi.r... • .. .• • • •tti Al. vac . • . • .• • s • • •• • • 0 • . . . . . • . . . .. . , • .. . .. • .. • • • 0 A : .. • . . . •• • .. • . • • • •• • • • o 0 . .. . • ................... :. ••: • .:::•.,..:..:..::.: E . • . . . .. • • . .. . :•.. 8 ill. . • • . . •• • •• . . . . ... • . . • . . ••. : . • • •• •,....:.•:•••••• , . • • •• . • •• • • . .. • . . . . . . .. . .: • . ••• • • . .••• . . . . .. . . . • . • • •• • .. .. • • . • • ... •• • : . . • • • • . • •:: :•• • .• . . (D ... . . . • • . • . . . .. . •. . • • • • ::. , ow '4 •• • • - .: •• • • •• ::::::::::. • • : c . • . •• • . . .. . • .. •• •• • • ::::::.:...: . . • • • . • ..• • . • • .• . . ;::::::::... • 0) .:. :. •••• • • . . • • • •• . .. • • • .. ... :. • •:.. . • • . •• .. .. . • . . • •• • :::::•:••:. a" • • • 0) .. • •• ••• .. .• : • ....• C • . :: :. • •• • • •• • . . • . . .. -. :: • • • •. .. . • • • • t..:.• • .:. .. : . ... : • • ' 0 .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . • - . ... ::::::: • • .. • • ::.:•• ... . • • • .• - • .. • • .. . -.• • .•i .. • '... • ••• . • - ••••• ), •• ::.:. . • . • . . . .. . • •. 0 ,.., . .. . .. . . . . - C a (.) ::::.• . .• .• ••,,!,i i• .••:.•v .::,. usti1 lir ::.: • '4( * . 11 ..di "...NM ;:::'::• . . *** 0 ::.•:, !:....• it :::•.:. A ::::.• -.... ita. •..i •••. '`ii :::• • .'..' A .:::..•• ::::.:' 4 .• • :•,.':1:11'•''•fe: :•,:k? .,,.. :::::••: • ::.:•• -41. ,••• :.:::::t '•:.:•...:• : . : • • • , ••••••• :..i.'...,. .. :::::.• •. .. i. , •• ::::::••• . •:. , . • •. ::::•:::• .•,..:1 eir,. • ••• • •• • ••• .....ii.::::: Aloi , r— -...-t . ••;4:7:,.'.7. . .• , ' - • :::• :::::::•.. ...: ::::•:•:'• . Ili '.• '''.....1.:e4 : ". 1:::•:... ••' ::::::. •• • • Ife.n..... • :. • .:•:::"..:f, . t[r. :::. ?•.! ..... ;::::..•• .st. !Iii.::.• .......1.....':.• li • 11. t i "•-rti• • • iii•:: •%it.li.ii,... iiiiit^ttoiel 144 ....." t '44::':.... .. -: .. :.:Aiik...• :::.: . ::::::::• k:. ....,.... , • o. . si„.10.: 1p—• 4,4"..i. • ... .. • .• :•••'.. • . . . • • ..4.,... . ..;•••1 .• 4.• L..... ...,..id7.•••••••• .;:: :: . ... .. . • • ..i•-i-t 4 . ...:.:::IP. • . sir 4 : ... ]::... • 7 % • .;f.1 t'4#4 • ••*: • • I lailliterq. • :::•' ,.,...A.j,r• .„.„..,•4)4.4„••••6- • ••• • : • :::::. ...• :::••.: • . .......,.......... • 1 • ...... ... . . •.‘,...,„..„44,,, ,I. ..........,... r i....7. i.......-...:::::::-.. ••• . ,,• ••••'.....:::.fr - ,i,...i 4...44. .. if........;•.:<.: ,-.........._:, -,••:. ... ., :. :..2 . .••••• . • .. ,.• • i fitt,• . ri.:•'.. . ..—• 1.. • . 1::::..• .. 1:::.• 1::::•••::• ...• • ***0 ,......... r.:. • : ii!ii:.:''.• ' • .,:::, tii... - •...,•••••••• , • . „... ::: • ... . .: :::•:..ii ita20:1:1• i .P.....,,:• „,„ i• • . :it 11:4.1111111144.. 1::::::.... • ....::: 1 ......t..: ....=. 1::•:......• ......:., 1 1::•.. .., 1::•••• 1::.::• • 1........1 ...........„ :::.. 1::::•:.••• • .: ..: • •:::::::..:•••• l i� _ I Lim a) 1 ?� `. • v ;r . r ai ale 1 . : 1- ill.10 41 0 g3 Z . it ,i, ‘L ::- .:..:.,1 _ 1:...e A-. . , 1 „. . ......:.,,,, . 1. • , 1 ; 1 0 P ..1(i i -.1 C.:1'54 4 cil) lea E z ...0, .. , . ..... . . . r Lee 0 U ! : L 1 t+ 0 1•,114 `. ,11 ' J .._. l J.., L E L I •.•••• i.i.I > 0 - 0 0 E E c ...1. ._ ."'" 0 1 c c 03 as 0 I— En • ::.;.:.:::: • ii:i.E::::::•01......: .....:.!..i. .•.::: • • ii. . • ir ..1,.- ( . .. . ,.... :::.:.:.:. ...„. .. . .. vi. :::::::. .r.....7 . . te: • ............ ....,.,..,.. ... ....f. ..... e •••;".::........::.:.. . .: ... . (D.-T t ee•• p .; .,e.;i Y•v ::: : :... :::..:•:. E. .::.: ' b .d'. p •.:' r ,t�� f :: M.:`t • •!;.1■x , • I L ••- r ,,,,:.,:ttl. . . .•::: •.:... .:.... ,...., .. •. ::::::.... C cii. •INNIS C ' :::.:.... 0 C,,,, ell•Na 44•••0 r .J C c .E a • • sue. .. C + :'zi IIIIII 0 o o F- 000 A.. ► . •• •• •• a. • .......:Hc.:::::::::::.:.::::::::::::::::::::!:..:::::.:.......•:.:::.:::.:::.+:::: .:.:.:.:+:.::........:::.::::::::.:.:::.:::.:::.:.:.:+::+:.:::.:..::.::::.:.......:...:.:.:.:::.:.:...:.:...:...:::.....,....:...:...•..x...x..x.:.:...,..........:...x...,.:„.....::.:.:.:::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::::::::::.:.:.:::::.:::. 9. I i .......•••••......•••••:••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••• ••• • • 111111= -JIM • ..04„,::: :::• .•• .:::::::::: .••• if!.:.... : • ••••::!::r 7-7.:'• •100111--:---- . .. . ::::::::::Q... • •ctiti. • ••• ••••::.:„.,......ii.. ....,. , . .,I . i• I : c ... ili:i:i•:. • (D.. .4). it . .. • is :::::::;:.. is. :ilt: (P.�i . M, • ::::::.. 5 .1, ..................",;., .. . • 1::::.:::•: ;' .--:..-.--.. --':,..:Ii ,.::: . .. 1::::::.... . co. . . ...,... ..* •Avil ::. . ::::::::::: . : • • . ::::::::.• 41 -ty. . • . : : .. . . ... • • 1:::::.::.. •.„,... ..... '. ��',1 .4) . .E... . •.. e. . :. •a '� . . 0 ,, Cl) y R � • :. . .. e .; • .—. M M111! r4,r' 4 • Vj IP IMO X 4 E. oi. sz.0 = .,,,e v ....,...1 u.. ......co < t '6 .° , . , . ...a.., .. ........ • • , ,. .. . :#.0 ,,.r .- ; . .. co. ,• .>iit. C/, W 3... .0.0...: 116 ,,.. co.. .• ....•.....•••• ".....'"." ...". ., .... . ......... :... . • • ..... 16.,..., :•7:7:77:::,.:::::::::7•:-:::7:::::?:::::::::',:::7:::,,ET:T::::::':7:::::'::::: Tr::;7:"T.".:.":::':".:::::::::':::::::':':::::•'r":":':.':::•::-.':::':.'::':':::.:::::.:::::.:::.:::::::...:::.:.:.......:...:.:.:.:::::...:::::.:::.:.::::::::::::::...:::::::::.:::.:::::.:::::::::.::::::7.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .:::::::::::::.:::::::11:::::::::.i::: Theme .s "Artistic" Re .:: :.. :r 's' .t : ..:: . ....:..• • .. ...:.::::::: :: :...•::.:1 • • : . • :::..:::::: ... . ::.::::•:..:::::: • . : ..."::.:::::: • : ::.::.:: el: :::.ail: Style Co:ntempOrary/Art y y ��X11 . . _F S An .1,4iik,;444.;.;-0 !'t..:::-- r . . _AV" ; .•x.16,, • JII . '� v y< . .;•b,7 : .. .. ...' .'....) • ..". --...1kliiiii 1 '7" ". •:•.... . Ott : . .. ...........:.:.:...:.. ... .. . ..: • r "'• i •:. x. �. ,ti . �� • • ■T h' . : as � , • . ...:::: .. .Representation. ...: . ... .. .. . . :.•::: .. ..... ......:.:. . .... • . ..... . . . • : . a . . . . .. .. ....:..... .Naturaltstic Style .•• - • : .: : re.: .. a• .. ::Nie ':• Public� Spaces • s c.a... , • Some Gate Use '°' Eei4,.. !! ..... .. 1jYjS r;::x; Fw::;.;::ri: 7 • • .7: . ' 'i e r u:• . .., .. , . ...:."......._.....,....:.,......,....,....................c.:.,....,u......:............,,.....,:.:.:::::....:•. .• • • ^x i j..x • . it 4: • i :.. ....... y • 1 o • •‘...arc-•'4 f .''�:'i.:::::'::::::::1..• ..T . ::: ::.... •• „ ',A •'• 1 ' •.::• • . _11i_, oi,...i. .............- : ,... \ . . ....<• +i: ;: .,p. _ .•la y ......:.;. � d . �� ‘ � Sie:�'0 f 1 4.. x 5 .I. '$ '8'. ' a/ : �� 1w^].,�•' i � � • 'S .. : ' ` :::.g.:....: l ,. •: l + VN ... i� " � ' - • .. :... � E ::::.:: 'mom - : : ::.. r ,:1 .s•4 �,i• j ......... ............................ ..: �� •+�.l •:;.::'v• �'�• ' : • • is � ' . 4W••: I 0. .;,F. . it _` I ' ii t 2.). ( C •C 0 td • 0 41 C Gm C 0411 1 . A iE s $. .:.! . a) 'II: :.: x si :....... ❑ °^.i` .........a) id ::. a) .:. L.... I 1 :::.. CI) ::: 0 1 7)..}.Y.K.1 ..Y.)..Y.Y.):V.) ":"..1).) V1(4 :).):1.(,) a'PE x n xxu E x E x Mx: � . x :. i: ......£. ,. . .::. F ..._�.. ......YY M101"" zy .. .........:.:............. • • ....-:......-:604 iimi.40‘:: •••••••:::: :.:•. ::::: .:::::-.:.::::.: Sti. e.et..-...:0::::: :::::::"....,1 :., n . :-.... .1[.....1.-Lici, :., ,...—. ::.:: • : • ...... . .. . .. ...... :::::.::•.• . :•:.:...:::.:•:: ::::::::::... . . . . . .. • • . •• • •: ..::::: ,:..::::.:.: • • .. : ow . . . : : :: :. Street :::::: ::::: .:::i:: :.: g: �r . . ..i. :::::'::.:. . • .. . :Burnham Str — Green tr ... • • . :::: :: '.::...H.:11 West Commercial Street Gate.: .e .: 1:::::•:: ti e .,.w .1.,. Ni• .• 4 . v.3,...... • it • • xk c. S , • • •. ':. }iii w'•.:.;. F Vi' ' e ��•` • Y r• , ... • . ..• r • . , ,,„.,„:... a lit - . 1.1..:Ig:::'.*::..: • . . . :::::.,......:.::::::::...„ • Street Design Concept.::.:.::::: .: •::.:•:• • • :::::.:::: .:::::...:... :urn : .m.. Green. .. Stre ‘i...Stre ' :::.. : . :::::. .. : . • • ligi.:::::::::.: :::::::. ,,,,.. 1.:.:.:::.:: .e.... .„. „J.:: ,..:•:::: .::::.... 1 1 ••••.• ::::.:.::• :•.: :.::: ::::::::. •• : g::::: . . • :, ::::: . ..... .. x r . .... . >3:. i xxx...>.... i >: .:.. " r• � . :uiR . 3 ;!. iii.:. i... : ::::. .:... ..... .. .':is 1 Alin. a cb .. :::: . . : .... • . .... . ...... ... ::::::.:. : a) I':::; . ...Ai, � .• . Ilik: C. . t: :•: .:•,•,: L. • ^m^ :xx::xxx m. A • n;. GO x .. 1::::... a).. P.A. xx • '�!`... x ....... .�' .. js. ill... cio : i •, • .• ::::::. ::. .4 'y^;:iii s ••• tiw evi r n', x A ... ::::..... . ::::.::.:•.. . . D: • treet esign . C Concepts :.'• 1:::.::::: .• ::::::::::... 1:::::• ..i:::::::. Main Green Stree: : Ip.:..:.: • ... .:::... . .. . JINN . . ,..1. . .. ::::s::::::: 4: H. :'° 'N x �.x x xx. x, 1: x :x x . ;:. ....M..xx.._.xx.,...xxx x:.. :.x. • xx .)- x x:: x x• . My` II. ii :x •,,{' l. ...................xx...iii:....%.....................x.............x.........................x....:: i 3, :' E a naa C7/ n ''f""' .: ♦1 CO .� • i:b • {C° ›.1.•›.1.•a :::.....°:. .... 0 CD . III,,1.11111P • 5 ' • 9� ... _ ii<'x • r_ .:::.'% a • 9 :.::::,... a) :::::. Li ...:: ::,,, ...... .:... ......,........:::,":. ::::.:::::.,.......::::::7:::::::. • :' • • • M • ;/ u Y r•:••' •••:x• i :• .. f ::::1;.:: • • : .. .. r, .. ::,•.• :: ... ::::::•:. . • .. . . • • • :::::..• .. . :. • •• • ,,,,.. ..•.,..„, ,....„.. „:„., • . . ::::::.•• . .• . . • ::::.••••• : .• • ..: . ... • .• • • .•. • :,.... . . :: . .. . : . . • . . . • • .. .. :::::•.•. • . • • • • ... ............ • . • • •••.. Street Design COflCeptS :..:. Streets. • .: 1EL E Green .: •treet 0 esign oncep • •• x;}N ,:�x. • • a w d I w r Plow :..,........• .:. 4.71,.:7'.: : x .' , .:.. :11•1.‘11° ., .1:41.., ' .-: ...'e : • .• • • x x..."x ro ,see'.:': jf r 'I-$ n t>. r::i :. *own own ree scope ! en aii . il Cit of i "C) . t . 11.;.. .. a 0 l. 4) .. .:: UI• $1.....0 I =', .::.:: ::.:" 0 4,..,4 (7) w E 4( • ].: 0 Z 2)- '1 ' • • • - ::: c 0 • 0 ei‘Q) i .'• Q L #E ilt (3 .E::%. tItt. (ID A II II ::• a • . *}w!# .4 tt t E *,.. �1f!� ## y CO : ri s tea...^ • •::::•:.:.:• .. ::::::::......:. • : ::„.. .. Street Desig: Concepts co : •:::::::::.:.....: . •. :::: :::::::... .:::::::.::•••. • . .::.: : : . r:x : reen:. Streets•:::„..,:•::::• . ::.:,.. :::::::.... ::::•... • .. . . .. :::::::.: ::::.:::... .. . . • . • ... x :::.:::::... .......:, . . . .. • ••••••• ::.:: . ::::: • :: .... • ::.:.. :.: • • : 4 : : __ _• y . ` 'Ii. :: . gl '� `�" ;''";, Y. N. .. 1. % . 7 ... ii i i ." ti. .. ' • . ... • r tl :: ij :ei Fra... i� e:jei • r . o- '.5: r { .N,. :...,,,.. : ',.: ' .F:'!Eii:'i:,ii:ili:::i: .E. 4.. :r. x . . .4.1.11.:..::..:.: .......... • _._.: ,;. 4;444;.,, ,.. 4PI ...� 4'iw:i i :::4444..:.Vii. .. ...�:. 4444 .. .. •rtk 4;::4 44.. %ti::?: _4444 ... .:.:��:. ... 4444.. 4444. :�.;;.:.::: i. ! E./.. I . . ift• 0 Cti • ... ;:r:: . . e e .. ... :.::.:,::... . •• •.. : :: . . • LE'c • • Q, ... • .. : Yxt> t 'z'E: EEFr� Ez iM„ .• ..... , .''!”. ''... i • • ii.'• ttb .... „';':, \ II:' .x. f :9. � � i v•!h . 0 • • 11•:•••:'• .1:1) O... l• ... # t. ... `..h.. .. .... U ^v:::x x., :.":.:::::'.''' 0 . :"Ir iiir...1 I.:•••••1 Ex� rYA9(; xx • • : ;::::... (.1) ................ • • i.. g. : •• :: g •••••• ..§: ' ............................... .... «.... . iii.::'::a:'.}:.... :.::: w.:.:...:.::.....:.:......:.:: ,......,.. ;:;:::.::;}:vi:iii:.;:.}• ..„.. .„ ,::,:::::::.,,,,..,,,,..„:„...,::::::::,: .•11114. Ai li• .I € ::::•:" • • •• . ..: : • . .I „oh. ::::• flar j 41111 . C13 ..t'"1.0r......''..::: io . ..: >--0,11p ....v co ?... 4:5 <tir:k......'...4:r.". ...!.. ••• • . • • • ii::::. (1) . cl) w•p•;..,1/44,.".eiteP:••••• ... . • •• e,(15 •'''''sfrif•litr4....7.:!' ...i! .. . . . • • . • ::!:::.; .44 Rik. • — ..?...ii:',.',T4:1,,Lalip::,!...0 ..... • • . . • • ••• .. • CO 44 1::::: km) (tbk Liti:C...'‘It.:."rYkk.';'••• • . . • •• • . .. .. • • CL [t. 03 " . 41114i;. 0 D .:'....'....lia•ft. . -,-•.`: •-•• •• . • . — r";17:.•'..•' sr::-.::.-!:•:'.?7•;. ••• .• • • •• . . . . . • • . . (7) i M 0 ... .. .. • . . :1)_ •:. Cl. ::::... • . • • .• • • .. • .... •• • .• . .. 03 • . • •• • •• • • •••• .. . • .• ... ...•••••• I . C 0 .. . oa . •• •• ... . • • . • . • • . . o c 46 Es • 0 ...T.. • .. .:.. ......• el g Zio. •• ;:D• ID MINIM 41 :::.•:• 111111.11, CO CO di 0 ' IA.::::,:::......:.:, • ;..., ...: t.F,44,.,:i• : .• . 11:!:•.. 43 . . Dl4.1.:.::.k:•:":!.•*.., : ":i::::i!::::::::,...::: . .•' i• = F.-- .•:?i:.,..i.-:-.V.A.560iif•s:...' . • •.• •. . .< ••••• • 401.:•::::A.••• 4111121:1 -•• ••• ••••••• . <Ciii• " 115 fa. '4. '. • . . ; -1:i....441: ....I 4 • ::.::'• ••..• :7•.•:•.:••:••••••01111:4:"....4". :4:''''::•.i,.1°. - • '`• . . . , Idiroio j .• :' .. :::::• •••••...-i.......:.••••••••■...,••E. ..A.0%4, .. ••• .• •V-,......;.!..:**.•:.."-4.•9::',en'If..i. ..• . • i::: illill • 40k••..••,......;:.3iikriiii4E.:..it A . . it......;•3171••••-•"" • •'. .0.:.! . ...7 rA0 • .• .... ...1.••:11....• - k- .• : •. . :.:• CO . .• " •• 7" ............t:.;•.';•• _ ,. . •...'.. ;. . i . • -:..•••4! . ..• -. ./.. ••!••`:‘ : . .• 1 r...£A•; .• 0 .' ' • . 4' 1 I r:. I. . ... • • - •4:::::1. ..........t ..,..1..1:IA, .. CO 1 ". .:.::.:.:.;.;.::• 5 'VI!.! .4 br f••11 14 ..•.•• • :.:. III•1..... .. e..,..-; k., A. •..: ...-.... - . ::::::..• ••• i ..i.• !':!:i;:ii.;g1.:1.,...1 /:1,:i•••Iti•Lf< ...11•••••... .• 1 -.....- .: ::,..... 411 .., .••••- • -•1:,:.":': i• ..," ..,.:••••p.....X.":•: • I.• ':::.:.• •. . . . .' :-. if ...:: . ili.1.4 ......•......"' 11E.:::•::. a) • ..::...e. ,. iiiii;. • .,, .. .. . . . . , . . ::::!.......:.r ......... ,, ....4„,4y:::.:1 • t U., •41', e............. •.• 4. ......, ..„ „..::: ::,.. • •••• •• •• •-••• - 1 1 :::::.• 013 ..... ... ,..••• , .....„.......• 4 ". ::::.:: . . :: ....,"•• . ,... ,,,,...;., . . . Iii....: 0: • .. .0 incii,• •• . ,45 .. . . • ::::::• .• .• ........._.• • ..... .. II:i..::• . . • ... . .. •::.. . i it .•• . . :P:::.::' .• .• .• - i •::!•.:•. 1::::•• • I ..• • . .... . . •• . •.•.... ... ..... ki. •• • • . . . .• • 1 .... . . . ::::..• ......... •• '''...:.":..::.: •...... i ....• • •••••••- ....• ..! **.:::.1;k• '''..t:.:' 11:1:..' i' • ]:.:::':.:::. 4. . . • . .. - .:::•:::•: I .• .• . •;••••• .. •:••(-'''',••.X'4:4••11:. ::•••• • 1::;•;•:•••• .. ./ • • •••••••••••... • • .1. •••.• .• . 1:!•• • .• . / • •••. J; • t•TA., • . . . . . El.: .•if . ..• - . . •:i'...:::li •• i . ....... • ,,,,....., . -:::::.-., I, :, : .... • ••Y!`'.Nc•is,4".••l''' :...5:41:4 -441.41':;... it.• . . . ..' ...4:: ',.,N. . .....,:•••':•<!.:•••;;;.::•!::.: • • ... • • . . .. . .. . II:iii:...:. • •. . .. • .• .. • ;1/4...i.4.‘ • . .:emil...a.... .....- .7*.t: •. •. e*.4•-• • ..'',....j N.4.., ,,,,,,,',..,,,-.: . .. - .' N;,..: .. .. .. . • . •. . .'• T••••••'',1.,'!'1,, $..•' 'NB,''',,n,3,••..,,, ,..• ..•:.1.2'...':41:..' .'''V3;. . : . . :• .'' '1%;'..•'•:i...A•i;..... • •.'.......';13.N,:', •,.. '. '.. .••..i 2 .: ••• :....• .. i ,;;.40.\•i.,••••:.,• ..S..... N..,.k•'•2 ••!.••••,••••••• .. P.!::•••• .. 2. 21.1•Al:'...:%?,.li:Vi:::,,,,,N,. ' ', 2. . .,:.:..::. .•• •••••••T''..".).. .k*44.,,, •• '•••.*,•. •• •• •• i:i:..•:.•..: .. . . .••• .. .. .... . . . Ef:::•:• . .. • i.::•:••• !i•:.i::.•• -• • . . •• •• • .• • ... ••• :::.::••••:::.::::•::::•••.. •.... ::. .... -Mit Alit • i�U t4 N p e . ,m .. a ': .1.....::::.:. C13 0 * • • r:.E:::;: (I) ...it") C N • C N fir:,,.>:.. C7 CD C in J w mom O 03 41 1d 4( k.� . ;sY 4.:11.•i • i:::: .. .... ...n W ..:..•:-.4..A1 ... :::. • • .:.: i\ 1.j .x� mow/ . .::::j:::..! .. Y'" kCx ,. • • v.. I • :::44.i• + y:: Y :::. (119 . • i ". .:.: .. - � : r:. ..g .. :: ....::. x` .. .:: :, • ".. ixx u:.xi 1111.. .. 1111 1111. .. . :::.:.:. •(.) .0 •• • ........ E.,..... cr.; 4.. . c).... .. ill a..• 0 . ::::.. ci) L. ,::: (..) ,.,,_ .szi,) ■ mow. e Ni 1:.i. ..C:1 cl# 1 1:!..... CL. ...c.-Cia. v .4.... Co Z 1:.:.: • CO 0 . ""' . F.7. .. a3 ... i 1 i 1 ,,, ' ... 1111... 1111 ... .. ... I ... 1111 ..;. 1111 g:•!:..i....... ... 1111.. ., •:::. .4,a :` ,.. 1• :::.•••• co ...... k ••. . y.:..4.,.....,...:., . .,.,.....• : :::•.....•• • •1 :.;. is 2 ...• .........„, ..::," :::, t• :iii 111.'• ..z .. i • 4.....:•.X .. 1111 . 1111... • .. � .:• � i :.� R 9 11;;11 a' ... 1111., ........:.::::�:::• .......,,, .. iii ... .„iii`i 1111.. .• 1111. • i1111. _ .. .' 0 1 eeF.• 1111: pp 1111. .. f v. P 1111 S: .T.. � :.. .. ..• 1111 . 1111.'% .. . - 11.:::::.:.::::.11:..• .......... 1111 . 1111.. .............. 1111... 1111... 1111. 1111 111:. .: £f 111. 11 11.:J:;: ....... 3,.t 3 . :...:::::.::...>::�:o-::::::�............. 1111... .: ... �. 4•14:::::::•:1:41:::•nii.::::•;: •:•;:1•:::::::::•1•:•;•;..4•:•:•••;•:::::.•:•;•:::::::•::;•;•:•:•;•::::;•;•;•;•:::::•••;•:::::.•;•:•:•;•••1•:•:•;•;•:•::•:;:*:1:1:;:i:1:7:::;:;:;:i3:1•;:::::1•;:i:::::::::::::;:T:IF:::! •;:::;•;:::77::::::::••••••••::••:•:••::•••::•••..:.:.:.r••••:::.:••••.::::::::::::::;:••••.k.f 7:::::•••••••:•':••.::•••:::::••••1:.:••••••••••••:•••:•:•••:,:::::•'::::•:::,:•••••••••:•••••••••:::•••••••:••••.:::•!7::•::::::•••.::::'•••••••:•:::•:•••!.;.;.:.:::••:•:•:•••;•:••••••••••:::::''.:.:;:T,'':::::''''',.:''''''''''''''71:::::::;,;:,:',':::'''.,::::',::::':.::::'::::':i•ii:,•1: :11::'• •• • . • • . ... • .... 11..:::•:•••••• . Gateways: /Pd.:W1c Spaces:. 1::•:..:••• ::::::.:• 1. Hybrid Character .•::.•:.• • : .:... : •bri• . ::::::. • . 111EIN .::::....:..:: ..... . . a eways and Public Spaces! •:::•::::. i....r.... : :. : . .. : .?....1.:':: .. AYS Var in aterial--. • • ..::::::: _ •••••••••• • .. . : •• ... . . . • • .• •••,::::::::.::::::::::•:::.. ...:::•::•.:::::•:.: ... .„..::: •:•. ::•.... :•:. :•:::.:.::: • • ••• •• •• •• • ... . f. •;.: . ,,,,.... : . .. • ... • . . . . : :: :...•• ••• • • ••• . •:•:::::•:::::::::: . • :::•. : • • .:4 :- .. .".•.:::.vnt,,,,...::::,,,,,,.: •::::,!:::::•:—....• • .:::: 4 • • . :. • . •;:•: A.... • fiiiii.::::...: .. " .. . .. .. .::• ... •hil ..•• " • ,to....:::•••••••;,.,,,,k1,, • " 15; •• ...,4:::::::::::„•:. •,•,••••••••,.. ,.• '. .... ..... „. . .r.2— .....,.. . ..: • C.,: ...:•• ' 46.. . 4iii„141•4 4 . • • .:: :. . 4 • PI •:::::t.'' . 4 l' .•,,,,,..i .• . .: . . • '•+.P.41. • iii •:..v44•4401114 ?)• TP::1,1v:'• '''' •• :'.....,:::.%:'::;:.!I::• ..,•:— ••••••=: — - 14 f.' --. :::::: •4::::• •• ,• • . . . • . . • •• 14..• • .„.......... ...... • ...4 .'•-••,1,4.i.,4, . ... ;;;,„!;;!•,iii:4,::...,:.!:.......:::.•. t.I• .: • i • •. m . . • . . ",!::::::::•:•...;„,„,,,,::,::-..::::-,s., • 111111111 k$11•••,•,. t...„ - • • . . . g . .. ' ... . . . ''', —Ti....: • , :-: .- f • '...4'.• ....1:00-* i!:•ii, '.j'•::: •4:::::,.•,. •.).. iii`41:1 ::::::, : • i .. . • . • ..... • ..... .. 1.:14,91. :15.:.. .•`•••• : . ••• f:: . ....::::.: .,.: ,.,,,i,,,, ,.. . _.,...L: C.• • ..:.• m% :•'';.:- ...... ' li.:41.:•....•••;1:*1:;!. • '.. ::: . .::..:..::.:.::::.::..... ::...J'... * . . .; • E •• ,...._. .:-••: •••: -.....:P.• i .• : ,.••• ..:.; ::•ii. .•:::.• at', - ,..,,,:::.".:.;.„.•,.:.:::.:.:::::.::::.::::::::,:!:.:...:-:::::::.:•:::::::::: :::::: •••••: .::::::::::::::: _ I. . ::.. :: .. : :::::::: q •::::- • • • • 1• 1LIL .....,i I i;-4........ Mcgii- 50: 44.1.........r...... :::.•. W......i• ':: :: 41 - •:::::::. • •• .. . • . :::• ..:: I :I' .,4:: • • .. : • • .3 ..:' ' .... . • ::•: 4 •:•• ::.•••••:. 11 ., ••• 11:::::!:•• •••• -1-• i —,''...- :.........r i 1:—. ....$ 1,•, .. , .. . .:•. ••• ••• • • • • •• •• ::::•:::. • • • :::::: :::•::::•:: • • • • ?:...:.::: „...4 ik • .4 . . 4- •: :: ::•:: :::,::. ••••:: ,:,:::: 4 •::".. - -:: ••••:. :.•::: *own own ree scape - a •:::::::: City of An, ....... imp...4 •. :::::.::...,:':.::: 41.:*:::•:•::Iii:;,:i. .... :;:::••:.....:•::•:•:•,' :1:::1;:$:•::,...:•:: . . .. . . . . • • •• ---- -- --�- ----- ---- h. - WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Portland Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area Low and Moderate Income Standards Effective March, 2006 Number of Moderate Income Low Income Extremely Low Persons Household Household Income Household in the Household (80% of Median) (50% of Median) 130% of Median) 1 $38,000 $23,750 $14,250 2 $43,450 $27,150 $16,300 3 $48,900 $30,550 $18,350 4 $54,300 $33,950 $20,350 5 $58,650 $36,650 $22,000 6 $63,000 $39,400 $23,650 7 $67,350 $42,100 $25,250 8 $71,700 $44,800 $26,900 S:Income Limits\L-M 2006 • • '°"' ') What is Affordable Housing in the Tri-County Area? Information for Clackamas, Multnomah, &Washington Counties. Fair Market Rent(FMR) for Metropolitan Area: 1 BR/$625 2 BR/$723 3 BR/$1,053 4 BR/$1265 One Person Household Four Person Household Annual Converted to What is Annual Converted to What is Income Hourly Wage Affordable Income Hourly Wage Affordable 30 % $14,250 $6.85 $356 $20,350 $9.58 $501 Median 4/5 time fast food worker,3/4 time child day Full time personal and home care aide, Family care worker or 3/4 time parking lot attendant. painter/wallpaper hanger or janitor. Income 50% $23,750 $11.42 $594 $33,950 $16.32 $835 Median Full time retail salesperson, reservation/ticket Full time construction laborer, meter reader Family agent or receptionist. or postal service mail sorter Income 80 % $38,000 $18.27 $950 $54,300 $26.11 $1,336 Median Full time cement mason, advertising sales Full time database manager, landscape Family agent, paralegal or credit analyst. architect, technical writer,or insurance Income salesperson. 100% $47,550 $22.86 $1,189 $67,900 $32.64 $1,671 Median Full time medical lab technician, computer Full time industrial engineer,human Family programmer, or insurance claims adjuster resource manager, police supervisor or Income software engineer Sources: City of Portland,Bureau of Housing and Community Development 2005 median family income(MFI)levels for Portland/Vancouver;Oregon Employment Department wage information,2003 Using This Information Median Family Income (MFI) is a term used often in talking about housing. As a statistic, median refers to the middle number. So given 101 people, person number 51 would be the middle, or median. The median family income for Portland, then, indicates the amount of household income for the middle family among all the families in the city. Hourly wage assumes 40 hours/week,52 weeks/year. "What is affordable" figures are 30% of total income and should cover rent(or mortgages and taxes) plus utilities. The 30% of income standard of affordability is used by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. This information is supplied by Community Development Network and Portland Development Commission. ' For more information contact Community Development Network. fa aCDN• 2627 NE MLK Jr. Blvd., Portland,OR 97212 503-335-9884. mike @cdnportland.org • ei h;h;a r Looking for an affordable place to live? At www.HousingConnections.org, it's easy to find up-to-date listings for affordable, accessible and special needs housing that you can rent or own. Housing Connections provides detailed,user- friendly information to help you find a place to live on one searchable website. Features include: O Descriptions O Photos and floor plans O Maps of nearby parks,grocery stores, transportation,etc. You can search for housing by: O Location O Rent O Availability O Unit Size O Accessibility Housing Connections even lets you search for special criteria such as laundry facilities, playgrounds,places that accept pets,Section 8 Vouchers,Ready to Rent graduates and more. Housing Connections includes both subsidized and private market housing throughout the Portland region,including Clackamas,Clark,Multnomah and Washington counties.And,you can find services that will help you get into or keep housing.You can also find affordable homes for sale. Can't get online?You don't need to be a computer user to get the benefits of Housing Connections. Call 503.802.8562 to get housing information from Housing Connections over the phone or to find the location of a computer that you can use to search the website. Renters Card r/o3 Affordable Housin • Action Plan - Ci of Ti • and Land Use Measures • Allowing accessory dwelling units • An updated and streamlined development review process • Reduced parking requirements for affordable housing projects Non-Land Use Measures • Tax abatement for affordable housing • A budget set-aside to reduce fees and charges imposed on affordable housing development • Support for the sale or donation of tax foreclosed properties to non- profit housing providers • Annual financial support for the operation of the Tigard-based Good Neighbor Center homeless shelter • Rent-free office space for a Tigard-based affordable housing provider • Identifying and pursuing available grants to finance needed on- and off- site public improvements, such as sidewalks, streets, and storm sewers, serving affordable housing areas or projects • The Housing Inspection Program to maintain the quality of the City's existing housing stock • The Housing Emergency Fund to assist occupants of housing declared to be unsafe or uninhabitable • The Enhanced Safety Program to improve the safety of rental properties • Membership in the Countywide Housing Advocacy Group • • f MEMORANDUM T I GARD TO: Planning Commission FROM: Duane Roberts, Associate Planner RE: Tigard Affordable Housing Action Plan DATE: 7/31/06 This is a brief summary of the City's affordable housing action plan. It is taken from the 26- page report entitled Affordable Housing Program accepted by Council in September 2002. The resolution accepting the report is attached. The City's guiding documents relative to affordable housing policy are the Tigard Comprehensize Plan and the community visioning report, Tigard Beyond Tomorroz¢t The Comprehensive Plan policies reflect the City's commitment to maintaining a variety of housing choices and to removing barriers to the development of affordable housing. The community visioning goals and strategies reflect citizen support for the application of a variety of locally appropriate measures to promote affordable housing. The action program followed by the City as a means to make progress toward maintaining and increasing the supply of affordable housing includes: Land Use Measures • Allowing accessory dwelling units • An updated and streamlined development review process • Reduced parking requirements for affordable housing projects Non-Land Use Measures • Tax abatement for affordable housing • A budget set-aside to reduce fees and charges imposed on affordable housing development • Support for the sale or donation of tax foreclosed properties to non-profit housing • providers • Annual financial support for the operation of the Tigard-based Good Neighbor Center homeless shelter • • • Rent-free office space for a Tigard-based affordable housing provider • Identifying and pursuing available grants to finance needed on- and off-site public improvements, such as sidewalks, streets, and storm sewers, serving affordable housing areas or projects • The Housing Inspection Program to maintain the quality of the City's existing housing stock • The Housing Emergency Fund to assist occupants of housing declared to be unsafe or uninhabitable • The Enhanced Safety Program to improve the safety of rental properties • Membership in the Countywide Housing Advocacy Group Except for the first mentioned measure, allowing accessory dwelling units, all of these are voluntary actions taken by the City to support and enhance opportunities for affordable housing. These adopted policies, goals, strategies, and voluntary actions reflect the City's current level of effort to meet the affordable housing needs of the community and to improve the quality of life for its low income residents. • • CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 02-5% A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A STAFF REPORT AS A COMPREHENSIVE DELINEATION OF THE CITY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM WHEREAS, one of the 2002 Tigard City Council goals is to "Consider ways to support the provision of affordable housing";and WHEREAS, during 2001-02, Council considered potential new affordable housing measures in four workshops and one budget committee meeting; and WHEREAS, the City's efforts in the area of affordable housing are directed to serve the income group with the greatest need, households earning 50% or less or area median income;and WHEREAS,the attached report titled Affordable Housing Program is intended to serve as a comprehensive delineation of the City's program to emphasize and encourage affordable housing in the community;and WHEREAS, these efforts include Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies and Beyond Tomorrow community vision goals and strategies as well as specific land use and non-land use measures;and WHEREAS,this program reflects the level of support for affordable housing determined by Council to be appropriate for Tigard based on local conditions and resources, NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The City of Tigard City Council does hereby find and declare that the report entitled "Affordable Housing Program", attached as "Exhibit A," serves as a complete and official statement of the City's overall affordable housing program. RESOLUTION NO.02753 Page 1 • SECTION 2: The City of Tigard City Council does hereby find and declare that the said report also is a definitive statement of how the City is addressing the Council Goal of "Consider ways to support the provision of affordable housing." SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This q day ofSQ.ipf4.0i.A— ,2002. A /1. I . ►.,.�/'� ayor-City I Tigarf/ ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard • RESOLUTION NO.02�� Page 2 • /Vm Memorandum o a To: Barbara Shields,Long-Range Planning Manager From: Tom Litster 17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd. Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Copies: Denver Igarta, City of Tigard Phone(503)635-3618 Fax(503)635-5395 Date: July 27, 2006 Subject: Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan Project 13381 No.: Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan Project Overview The Downtown Streetscape Design Plan process began in December 2005. Completion is expected in September of 2006. The plan was a catalyst project for implementing the vision and guiding principles of the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan ([DIP). Concept designs were developed for streetscapes,gateways,public spaces, and green streets. Conceptual design plans based on TDIP principles provide specific boundaries for improvements,general configurations, dimensions, and a basis for developing planning level budget estimates, so funding sources and amounts can be identified and implementation schedules established for final engineering design and construction. Functional improvement plans were developed for street lighting, street trees,'bus transit, street connectivity, pedestrian circulation, and improved access for the Main Street commuter rail station. Traffic analysis included existing and future conditions. Future conditions assumed the level of downtown redevelopment envisioned in the TDIP. Public Involvement The Streetscape Working Group (SWG) served as a citizen advisory group in the development of the Downtown Streetscape Design Plan. Most SWG members had previously served on the Downtown Task Force. Through the process, they provided active design input and valuable "testing" of design ideas for consistency with themes from the TDIP. The City Center Advisory Committee (CCAC) serves as a citizen committee to comment on proposed urban renewal projects. The CCAC received regular project updates from City staff. • I:\LRPLN\DOWNTOWN\Streetscape Design\Planning Commission\Planning Comm 080706.doc IP Project Update Page 2 Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan July 27, 2006 City Council members also serve as the City Center Development Agency (CCDA). The CCDA is a decision making body for urban renewal projects. They received multiple project updates from the consultant team and City staff. Interviews with property and business owners along Main Street and Burnham Street were conducted by the consultant team in February of 2006. Participants were given updates on the planning process and an opportunity to ask questions and make design suggestions. A Public Open House was held in May of 2006. The street design concepts, design concepts for gateways and public spaces, the public art plan, and overall usefulness of the open house were rated highly in the formal comment process. Plan Elements The design planning effort consisted of three iterative parts. Each part was guided by the themes and great ideas of the TDIP,with an opportunity to examine in greater detail the opportunities and potential constraints for making on-the-ground changes in downtown Tigard. Framework Planning and Principles A framework to implement the TDIP vision through specific downtown improvement projects was developed through work sessions with the Streetscape Working Group (SWG). It provided a thematic basis for concept design and specific functional improvement plans for street lighting and trees, transit,pedestrian circulation, and future street connectivity.An overarching theme was the role of sustainability in revitalizing downtown. A Unifying Elements palette of materials for streetscape and gateway design was developed. The intent was to allow for specific materials to vary from place to place, but maintain a recognizable "family of materials" throughout downtown. Primary characteristics are texture, color and form. A Public Art Plan added a new dimension to the TDIP. Public art will bring a unique vitality to the downtown experience by creating a set of interconnected places, and emphasizing the flow of people, history, and nature. The Public Art Plan identifies three distinct areas within downtown for complementary but slightly different types of public art. Streetscape Design Concepts The TDIP recognized the public value of quality streetscapes. The first of the catalyst projects was the Streetscape Enhancement Program—a priority leading directly to the Downtown Streetscape Design Plan. Three downtown streets were identified for conceptual design: • Burnham Street • Commercial Street (West of Main Street) • Main Street • r Project Update Page 3 Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan July 27, 2006 Burnham Street and West Commercial Street have been scheduled for final design and near-term construction. Final design effort will be guided directly by design concepts and thematic elements developed during the Downtown Streetscape Design Plan. Conceptual design followed a three-part approach to implementing themes. First, functional design parameters were considered. Parameters included right-of-way width, travel and turning lanes, sidewalk widths, on-street parking, and bicycle lanes. Creating a high quality pedestrian environment was a paramount consideration in developing those parameters. Second, characteristics of an urban village were refined by selecting appropriate styles for street furnishings,lighting, and paving options for sidewalks. Third,was a green heart for Tigard. Opportunities to be "green"include maximizing trees and landscaping, as well integrating sustainable development strategies in the management of stormwater run-off from streets. Specific "green street" design principles were also developed. Green street design is often thought of as innovative techniques for management of stormwater. However, stormwater management was not the only principle identified. Existing or future streets with limited opportunities for innovative stormwater management can provide other aspects of a green street. Gateways and Public Spaces Development of thematically integrated gateways and public spaces will also create dramatic changes on the ground. Gateways are portals in the streetscape,which create highly visible drive-through entryways and landmarks for the downtown. Design and scale must attract motorist's attention without becoming unfriendly to pedestrians. Gateway design will also express key downtown themes by drawing from the palette of Unifying Elements in final design. The locations identified for designing gateways into the downtown include: • Fanno Creek access from Main Street • Hwy 99 and Main Street • West Commercial Street and Mairi Street • Hwy 99 and Hall Boulevard • Hall Boulevard and Burnham Street Public spaces will provide small"urban rooms", designed to invite pedestrians to enter and linger. Even though the public spaces are small in scale, they can express the "great ideas" from the Tigard Downtown Improvements Plan (IDIP). Concept designs for small public spaces included: • Liberty Park at the north intersection of Main Street and Highway 99 • Main Street Park at the south intersection with Highway 99 • Interim demonstration garden fronting onto Burnham Street • Commercial Park west of Hwy 99 • • - Project Update Page 4 Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan July 27, 2006 Green Heart Projects After developing concept design for streets,gateways and public spaces the consultant team suggested a series of linked projects that could form a strong beginning for creating a visible green heart. They could become the next set of catalyst public projects for downtown, emphasizing sustainability,green connections, and a walkable village. Project development can integrate potential green street demonstration projects for Burnham Street and Main Street with resource and open space enhancements along Fanno Creek as well as overall streetscape improvements. In the future, development of the Urban Creek/Green Corridor will extend this green heart toward Commercial and Scoffins Streets. resign ramewor _ _ _� • no • N A key step in completing the Downtown Streetscape Framework. The project team and the SWG approached station improvements for bus and commuter rail • Light and media works Design Plan was establishing a Design Framework for the question of theme as three interrelated parts. Each • Demonstration or community gardens the public realm of downtown. The framework reflects thematic part was considered as a basis of design. • Street Lighting Plan— lighting types and spacing the Preferred Design Alternative from the Tigard (full lighting analysis can be found in the Attempts to make public art uniform or singular in its Downtown Improvement Plan(TDIP) and was • Functional Design—safety,comfort and access for Technical Appendix) theme are not encouraged.Art is a unique opportunity to developed during work sessions with the Streetscape users of the transportation system step outside the conventional design vocabularies of Working Group(SWG). It provided a thematic basis for • Green Heart—trees and landscaping, connections • • Street Tree Plan— spacing and canopy types streetscape and public space. Through its diversity and concept design to implement the TDIP vision. to open spaces and sustainability creative expression of ideas and themes it can heighten In any downtown revitalization effort vision cannot be • Artistic Representation— streetscape furnishings • Street Connectivity—future roadway connections the experience of downtown and the interconnected . i the only element. The Design Framework focuses on expressing a style or historic period flow of people. specific downtown improvement projects. Street connectivity was part of an overall traffic analysis • A palette of unifying elements for streetscape and for street function improvements. The analysis ' • Streetscape Enhancements . gateway design was developed. The primary addressed existing and future traffic conditions, • Downtown Gateways characteristics are texture, color and form suggesting a alternative transportation modes, functional • Public Spaces "family of materials"throughout the downtown area. requirements for street and intersection design, and it The combination of specific materials may vary from recommended roadway connections. The full analysis - place to place but there should be a visually can be found the Technical Appendix to the Downtown Each project is an opportunity for action. Over time, recognizable consistency. Streetscape Design Plan. Photo Here: completed projects will represent a significant public SWG ' investment in the public realm. Fully realizing the An overarching theme discussed with the SWG was Public Art Plan potential of downtown Tigard will also require City sustainability in the revitalization of downtown. Public art can bring more vitality to downtown agencies to become plan stewards by funding and Becoming a more sustainable society is another experience by creating as set of interconnected places, creating project partnering opportunities for the urban unifying element for the specific themes and guiding and emphasizing the flow of people,history and nature. renewal district, and by reexamining the City's zoning principles of the TDIP, the Downtown Streetscape It can s more memorable and heighten the experience of and development standards. Design Plan and future economic development of street corridors, gateways and public spaces—key ` Tigard. Specific sustainable principles can include: aspects of the public realm. The Public Art Plan Design Themes and Unifying Elements identifies three distinct areas within downtown for Discussion and refinement of a general design theme for • Recognize mature, healthy trees as a high complementary but slightly different types of public art: ' , downtown was integral to the development of a Design performing environmental tool in the design tool ,- : kit • Civic Art ' ' ''.:ill, A{ v*` - ► : ` • Make sustainable practices a visible educational • Main Street Art =4;y':;' t,J . �� '' tool • Green Heart Art z, -it , •. 1 :: • Improve pedestrian access and circulation Photo Here:•'` /= G • Recognize environmental and social sustainability Implementing a public art program should include � ' i f°i Open House oy- R. provided by open spaces assessing the potential for regional support and funding, • P ' ,r �� 3 ?. ® = • Emphasize green street stormwater management setting aside urban renewal funding for art, making .,. • , � a,, •. • Identify policy and development tools to integrate public art a part of the mission of a specific City agency, �s C' -4-'Q� k° 7.- sustainable systems and coordinating with local businesses. Implementing ., •, r;,�►� ,fit o Q.�, .� `� '' y g P g �'. '" �' \.�, X'„`; %„ '•• T-4 ' actual artwork should emphasize a variety of artworks " L4.�.' �+�' ' � .'��' '-� I Functional Plans and experiences. For example: '}. -''• s. �'e,.'‘,44 •�' �: The Design Framework includes a series of functional %; ' ?, `' -. • .,, plans for the downtown area • Project inspired by local history =� � � r' ,<` .. O .+ • Ecological and nature-based art ---, t-4- , Pr-: -�ir.4 • Pedestrian and Bike Plan—primary routes and • Ephemeral outdoor projects `. �k recommended street crossing improvements • Object-oriented works • j� = •• - f t • • Performance art � ' z " • Transit Improvements Plan—location, access and • Text-based works DRAFT 6/30/06 PROJECT AREA Downtown Streetscape Pla city of Otak. July, 2006 TI GAR • • resign ramewor • FRAM EW • — P LAN l ‹),\\ \ ‘S;N, \I I Li i , �� -�\ / �/ `` �� . ; .i f Streetscape Design Concepts ��\ , , �', \\� I' .1 . , ' (this project) i ) r \ I ' ' I I i I i ;::;;;:::::::ts'2.-\,,,..,,, • , . \-. . - - /// --, ///- <:'-?..s- , l ' .0 • \\ ` \ \ /##/>' I Q Future Gateways. i_1- : . . N � L�w'\ ,t 4 ,'' O �/ ,z,`*.` �� 000 1:15/'- .� /� "��'+ .� Lti�) 7 Fanno Creek Master Plan .1 yo-, t�,'�\ } �4 I �i .. �`\Y \>.42.- c°,4.,,,\... O " /� ��j!// /�O, i -�{� I i Green Corridor Urban Creek \ O / , ' ,,. / \ ).. ...-- , .N'%,\ ' %. ‘%//7/ .', ' K\K/<X Li : 1 1 t ' .: / r . ' '-'' -\'\ </) \' 7\zi , ' ,17,/ .'-. \N(-17 '�'\,�� ' tw: -T�* `' , • 4/-I� \ < `/ „:////)/ Neighborhood Park-,'.4.,--:„:, :';'i''.;'\C' � ' O � QOM . , , . / . t • ..i.t14. , - . ' \ \ •, / . \ <2<,2<n> ' , \t \ D i\ c� Multi Use Trail d W\ I I New Railroad Crossing \ +0 ,. ,yam: 0�0' "� , • • Q Q°R� `s ' �Y O \ , ,. • 2 .. . . . ./- /y///„././ .? ,(.' 1 1 \ \\ ,./4 ,/,/, ,. 6 . 0 Downtown Streetscape Pla 0 -• City of Otak, July, 2006 - - T1GAR MID . Design ramewor7 • -►�_ T Functional Design Green Heart ., -. -.-%:-.4.-43',4!" Artistic Representation "t` Style or Historic Period - Safety, Comfort and Access Open Space, Sustainability, Connections �= -. ��#.�i ty -Pedestrian Environment ,.1 t -Walkabili ty -Trees and Landscaping µ„ , .. - Street Lighting - ' -Bike Travel - Connections to Public Spaces .� t . - Street Furnishings ( s, - - -Access to Transit - Connections to Fanno Creek l — Sidewalk Paving - -On-Street Parking - Sustainability { .. -Public Art - . -Traffic Calming - Public Art _ : Implementation: Implementation: Implementation: - Street Design 4 - ' - Street Design Concepts - Street Design -Gateways/Public Spaces -Pedestrian/Bike Plan - Green Street Guidelines -Transit Improvements -Public Spaces/Gateways - Gateways/Public Spaces ., " : • • -Transit Improvement Plan - Pedestrian/Bike Plan j -Street Lighting Plan - Connections to Public Spaces I -1.7") ,_ '---,7"--;-,Tor: , _ _ _ •rte.— -A �.�.• -- , - 4'M . .. , s *44, • , ..• •• vi A.04.. -'a, '� FOUNTAIN . j :'•''^ • 7-_,-...-.... . . , _ -1 . ir *4'n✓ 4 . r :t ' ti •' \ IL I � . V � t t-...i's ∎ i +hr o � � i,a i` R•L ` ''✓ s r..,..„.: 6 ��1t . .,.. ,,, , " iZ_- t �. 1 aii�s —1.1.-A-7. i {, •"" ..},, ; It 4v :\e-c.•_ 06 Downtown Streetscape Pia City of Otak, July, 2006 EIGAR Design ramewor 7 - - _111..- - - - ;1. _3.1,3.'.‘:...-' A �_- `: Guiding Principles - ;, .- z Streetscape furnishings are finishing touches for . 11/11 \\\\\\\\\\ \\ • -� , --�ssw , :r r' ,' "place making."They create a human scale and help• s.— ,. -N:, , - , to identify different functional areas of the•Classical Style _ = I/ f �,'`:�`' ; • ','•'sz=` streetscape. Complementary furnishings based on 11/411.6,1.111s1.11,4A.,:„.--i.:----. � =_s�si� , - guidelines from the Unifying Elements will provide a z - ' ra•� \_ y �F 7 t _ 'v thematic consistency that is a key implementing : -_, _I• _ .: • ; __, ' "'=:`Y� - principle for the Downtown Streetscape Design Plan. Y �� ,,,,r�r� „�� .��f-, `.� '� Information kiosks and signage are opportunities to ' `� - �� s e =:,7�' % .•' • incorporate furnishing characteristics into other ' Preferred as the dominant theme in streetscapes and gateways visible elements of the streetscape. Signage may be developed with unique architectural forms and , materials or grouped with information kiosks. Kiosks can use an architectural form suggestive of other conspicuous forms such as the commuter rail station. Consideration should also be given to ''''` - - ■ ' ' -rx - '"• -r` - --'` ' h` = t' t masonry pole bases for the conventional types of• _ � ( �� street and traffic signs.As an example, pole bases f - 7 :',i• �sf -.' .-•� ' - ��` _ - could be complementary to the columns and walls of tk '°> hL_ -r-.=.--:--- " �,:- ' " t�Y nearby Gateway designs. Contemporary- 4;! — b - r - r„ y �r- �; `� ;` ��j' '= �' — - ••• _;r '- . _ _ ,3 .' .�; 1ta � i I+ ;i /ff �'.�•� ,;' �C.i�.._�--=--------- i' -. r;� Art Style ./.-• _ `,.N . M� \ • 'sl / s' ._ f ,,}. �! .� r mil_ _ �' �.' .,/ - *11:,:°•‘-.1:':;1'. .".._- �'� ys'ti \ 1 r` ,k., f4. •,Y--• f. ~r l .\ -✓'r Tl� .c' A �/ ; ;r _ ,.c - y- / STI ' . � & \ _..,1,,. •.. "/ ' r'• %R4, ;%• i' i e� ��•cf ,-, , ' F.0 \ , , / • F ,' ' `\ ice' �q{ C *-' 7 nf• - .I% # T-'- ' j `_ --* .. , 44 . Limited use as a counterpoint to classical style in streetscapes and gateways -r , -f j •_ is - - x - V•1 v , ' MiI. -! • • . ,..- • • • .;Z � '''*-0.... • r Naturalistic ,._ ,.1 ,.;;1. , ' . _ c ,w. - - ,-` x s * ,: 4 • , Style =1 .y''= . , . , ;; _ + p . _,:c-A.,` .. {`��.'/r�' ( r t� '2 j --s "1 ter , �,. �. • - 1 j: , .vF'" •� I.` ^a.:.: -.-_._ � •-'�` q[. - 2i��1.3•,• ,. _tom p ��,,..', I, •U�* k.. ? - • c� •f r'il �. .�. .may: _ _ rj�. • 1•"'• .A-r �'�t_ -, << : - - • ., C_ _. - _ y 6/30/06 -""'S. 4'14 I'h- . 5 ,, g y.-'� '«• • K } R.+r 0 4 '1 'l• .•? •�� !-z' «�- •+rte Applicable in Fanno Creek area, Commercial St. gateway and public areas Downtown Streetscape Pla City of Otak, July, 2006 TI GAR Design ramewor7 NI FYI N _L_Al KEY THEMES Unifying elements for downtown streetscapes,• • • t ►*3r':#�•3a iiws�r y11►, • gateways and public spaces are intended to express the themes of an• ./ y ,r + t_ �. , .1,..- _ urban village and a"green heart".The emphasis on one theme over - it .- yt- - 'irtkO £' '- '�1 -:- - irf;t - ••• .=.4'-. .� f�, l' ,rirr< v r ?•. ,�-= another may vary from street to street,gateway to gateway and among• •�- � - t;:" .' '•! , A { .•ate! .._?, � the key public spaces.However,a unifying palette of textures,colors IIII!c:�;•,'` � ��'� �� / � / t j� �� - and forms suggests a"family of places"and the visual interest found in S - t f !'C' i t-� 'i i''" - �, diversity of design. • .� _ _ _ 4 ?'1 J It.J." , - '.--4.',, t t zy. - „w v -mac - i =.- `? '• •, •--..-''-` -- ,s"{`.'.e.','' 1 1 ■ , �ji *� <••, • TEXTURE Texture can be a unifying element through a simple and �� : }�. . consistent palette of materials for paving,walls,columns and railings. The materials may be used in varying combinations as part of • 0 n P. ' , • A streetscape and gateway designs. a: 0 `,\1`\\``` . �� Material Application ;1^ ```;1\ x = ti<<, _ t i �� Scored concrete Sidewalks,crosswalks,gateways yr � r `' r. Pervious concrete Sidewalks,gateways,public spaces •_�� ,. ( %'1�\`v' _ < i _ �' - Concrete pavers Sidewalks,gateways,public spaces - -"'t 4a Stone Gateways,public spaces(esp.Fanno Creek) )/ qr.,:..` $ • r 4�. ��,.:. , ®. '1,,,N1 , :Ty }: • `t . Compacted gravels Public spaces(especially Fanno Creek)and — m }<, :, • ¢ Gateways c t �'; Decorative metals Bridge/overlook railings,barrier fencing, '_ Y i' _ f Street furnishings --- , _, (t 2y T� COLOR Color is a visually unifying element linked to textural - i14yJ �i� 3 _ • ' ii ,� • , ••._ , iyyt� t. - •,\ ! � � y „��.r:-.;Pa materials.Colors tie together spaces separated by distance and function. 1 `t� :y 1 e �,, ,=,u� !{� _ \, . Black is recommended as a unifying color for streetscape furnishings 1 s a-�►- �, P .a'`'te �] '' ,`� l ss%�� < <nr i� ' . and decorative railings.Complimentary colors of grays and :•-, .j� } ' -,:'. h ;r l;: 'i _ '_ -1-�" � ►" _ •? ° reds/oranges can be found in the selection of sidewalk/gateway paving, 1,,:..,..:,:_. '° t= �, L 's:� , r'�`�q ' -` ,_ �' - gateway columns,walls and naturalistic stone work utilizing locally n' .-_ _ - .y A - t ' -:� �"" '' /� available basalt or similar. tf'S - I .T• (• tl • y -;_ .. j :fir��j' .L -.a&r; :�ti4,;,- {' `•4 N ��' ? PLANT MATERIALS are an important color and textural element as 71 9 �I ..► ' `"" t_ ` well,providing the unifying appearance of green(especially in the it r -4:4// .�. � _ -- '.- •, 3 'e4' P g fY g PP ( P Y 1-, is ¢� ___ — F; {� * ` E' I street tree canopy)and seasonal change through flowers,fall foliage i _t 1 ' ! Tt� y �'fi �C L °` '',,?�;�, `Y�� rye •�r and colorful winter stems and branches- - 1 � t- '.,r.� i•1 of , ` e•' J'1! � play '��. - {r t, {ii��' G t r ; '. FORM Form can provide both visually unity and interesting visual ,�' ••�:; j �i�u ��0 :-;�_ _ _,, �y, _ .• distinction.Form,along with color and texture,provides a sense of It = °�"� • - .-• "C 1 =• • °�5 = orientation for downtown and become visible landmarks.The preferred aform for downtown is the"classic"or"traditional"style,particularly y\,,`�`. with regard to streetscape furnishings. However,more naturalistic aru 0 : r t, , v forms may also be appropriate at gateways or within the public spaces. ' ��I .1� \� PUBLIC ART-Public is an opportunity to explore the use of key �a ti textures,complementary textures not found in other streetscape or ` O', I , l }t gateway elements and provide enjoyable elements of surprise in form r. �r o . i` j or interpretation of themes. T DRAFT 6130106 Downtown - treetscepe P a - City of Otak, July, 2006 T I GAR NW Design rameworg .... — NM I A 1" T" 1::) L A NI . fp .I.. ' • ir""‘ ' • ....4;,:•'416:. r .-,.. ...):74. .- ''2.7.2.,-'.-':,0'.....--:..,••,i,' •-t, ,, _ :,,. ortd A r, 1 ‘•• •;! 4.7::-1,.141,..gl,":„S- - -- :2.-7••,',•,, 111111141 ....: • .., - , , ,, ' •• —--- '4 1 ," - • , :-% •• • 41 .71;::' te >1.r: "‘•■ i •‘• -7 4, • /i'Ali, .n.:' ‘4,..1,'," ;•7t;•4 1 ' 1( Vt .1 it ' . " r i- - - %z). v ,,, . --. .; _ , : , - :-.17,77„-, • • ......., /...:-- 417,4". te..7.-.tc-- i' - '" ' t'T `' a ' • !--). s• ' ' , .-•-•, -_ ;,.'..: ,. -..;' "1",•' '. ... S ..11. '' • .c.• a- 'Ill I. - • • • .- '. I 7.-- ,mos,-;,..`' -,,..; •-., .-,,,, .s-. ., , '„ , \• •.1 • ..,.. '44.":,. ,•"---- ? 7 ii":" c,:ki ........ -:::: '-:--. '...,-•,.-...-1,,, . CIVIC ART 47 1._I-r 11,--:-f. .• i 4 ,,,, :-.-., ppm-- „1 ! r .., , - .„.• • . , --Nk7,4 iv,. , ,.1 ,... ro ..;•■ — ..,_ '• '' -4#1 ,_' ' , ',. .1:7, ."\-,;,,,,,-,...-....v.„ , ,', ,- ...., •-v •• ... ..,,- - • --,• • ,, f .. a- r- .. ..,-., , ..- • .- ,._._ . ' . it- 2„. „. 1:,f .• t ,,, .!_-.%\z_\ -.:7:"...■,.........k. , :,...,',,, •-•_,,.. . , -\ ...,.::,,,; • -... . ._. to" ,.,!...„ , . • ....... .... ,,,,,..-v t 4........ . - . . , -Large scale gateway artwork or water - - •,,-• ' • 4,:ji.:1,.. ..:,.:.,,_et.e‘ k,,• •--...74fr---1., - - `t.. - '..,,,,;---:.-7.;:=';---- . 4 ....":-: -.,..-" --) -- .. --. • -.1■':<-:'-:'0.. l'',-;-':) 1'- ''''•;," t.,...s.Ai4--cie.,:,' t, :. feature visible from a car • . 4- • .- , . ., •-.4-- : • --- :/•-• , , ea-let - • • . ■ ,/ .I.,.e. •`s\-- ■...• •i.„.;-• -•.--.--1---,i--:-..-• --- -• -- \•.--,,--,--....... ....„. . ' f'4's. ,..'46/• (11 ,ap.t.=, .'•/•'( .' -- ':•,-Ik47--st':-14'F\-2-,1,..-'-'---%• 'i•'''''.!•-.1.P• -1-••1P,-- ,-''''• . •--• 4',-,' ' • ;•.. s4 4,.., v`.' :-/-- ' \s-wer,-.„>--- --=--;."---:•-• ' . .... ...."--s.:"...., of; -.yr- •• ,,*le-pk., '-;.--,•-"-4,,4- IR),-• : %IP- _ -. „,-"7 4.1.01i ,-\: , .."' ""'7 ' i‘t■IS, "'..."".•• • A., •••••" , , -Reinforce Hunzilcer intersection , ....._, 4. ..."..„:1. :..s•-•- • r„?..inir • - •••• : ;to....,..s.■ ":` ..47'..:?.'.*. .', ...,. . WI/' ' .ss 2 -'''r::" i e . i' IP.. ..- < 3.-Y..\. ' '',-- Igr., 1: 1 ,N. •• , • . •N ,2". .-1,,A4 ' : ' . 1 3... , :.: .., ...---.• ''•-• - '.',.4,3.. •4',.:*•:-..1.•:V".•,----.';-i. . .• . , . • 10. .. - - - ..,... - -.- • ... - • .1.',Z••;,,,.,• ' . ''.-n ...... -• . '' (4; '''':•°t7;r.' -.' M • '''' . ... g a '7= ' ; I - Reinforce civic themes like governance . %,--::•-•• --, -- — ,..:---- *tr ...:4 0,•-•-. ,.,•? • ''•: /. `!....t,..-- "'." \,`1,.•;■• - .,../. 1 ,.:-` -_- .,•:-,..• _ • • i'l, '.• = . . s . ''' ' r''' 1 ' - •• '' . •••• A.'",t= , ' ' ‘4A,'• ' '''' 4' '....'4% s'..1'''•"" S-'''4" '7)".•' -,..-.-.. - --'•' ! / I Ii''' - -. r•-•a.:,,. .,•. . ..--- i't •,;--•- - • -.:-.4" .1.* ..e) . .. 4., -.- . . '- lip 44;,-..., f - -'..1.• 4 7' 1-• .• -,-..;-•' • .c.,,,-, -s•rii••"--j,) ,,,, --" • -- i . ■Y :- '.) , . . , ' ff, .1Y • 'iv, ,/, ,,..- , t., ii- 7- ...... ..., , -:....._ :.,,,, .••••••••,,_. •e / .-w -,--,—...--, ., . MAIN STREET ART , . .- / , •• ., ., . .--...:: :••,--•s-.. , • "-.....t . .' ,:i.ix., , . .,...4%e :,t^', -1 ' 7,-, ''''■,.' • ' k.1, I , •,r.,. c/ 4k* ,-.1 '1„ --,•_, --, — - ,, Tx '■ z..""-. i'I,. ‘11 '-'• . ' j I . • '•s. . ' " .-'., • ,...; f ". ' '' ;.'.. N'''' ---.- ,,, ''!-,..'S 'rz 1. -Mark gateways at 99W with sculpture ...„., ,,. - ••,-' ---.-...-- .: .••• , .- - - -,.. „.. -,., ._.,•,, . , ,,...,,,,,,..•.,- ...- ..,,,; •- • , .N. -..... ,..,, ,•• i , , . . , - - - ... •k, . - . __ -1,- . _ .....;-- „,••• , - •..---.- . ..‘••• cr.'? ! - or water feature to invite travelers on to ''. 47* • ,/ ' - ' ' - ' -4: ' ' ' ok Itr - 4% • ''/\:- ‘ ., ..!..r .." '..i ' a , ' "...; . ‘,.`V;"'s,,. - 42 ' , ' . , - • e:e /. . -11 1 1. . • •'''• ""--" " 0 '- '.. ''''''''4".,, ss " ' - ,?..5.,r ''. '-.,, N.,./'4111. ,1:',4,,,. ,• • '''' .\,V/ • ./ , ,. , A.. . -...'1- ...'" : '•"- ,1"- Main Street • , . , • .. .,:s - , 4-- - ," - --...•••. . ..,• ,.., . ... ....„„ t, . , .1 .,, •••,,,. .,......, -- ‘,.../z....----...3-..", ,•„:• ieIs?s\„.„,..c , t,..- ', '• ":..,,. , ,,,.-. , .•-". - -1. , . . . It :.• ,.-.-- ..,•::'-'•:.-4. .-- •-' '-' ;'" ' ‘'-• -• /;.' / s- • ,•••''',.. „,-;•::- :•'.---- : • -, /....t - , - . i , , , . -'. ! • . " . "-..'' %.1,'--:-• `i;,/• / o.-• ,. . • -/-,•-•,..", , '.. -/.'• -'s! ',", '...-•,,‘'; . \ -,- c,,, 1,,,Eviara• I ! .... -Commuter rail station: clock tower or - - .. •••' '•• 4c.- -,„. ..,-f" -,„ ,, f 4..-4 -..,' , ' ,:f-;;:,-,-,:-- , .:-,, . y.,•...e, • ' ' • :..,. - v---'.V`• .•./' '7'1 ; '•• ,4:;"--.,!.-:•*• r- "...,t-)"."N :9,•" • • ... - ) 1'1' vertical artwork visible from 99W ' -Nfo'k7A,. '1- -... . ' 4V..i4*-, ■-,, .. ' . . , . . . - ..- --;f-i.---, •-• • 4. . ..• - .. ' X.• P' '.•-..4 - ,•>.--,-,"\:i, • • , . „ , ', f- • i' :' ./;:,1.' ., ;,•,‘; „.•./'' • ,.• ,f, .‘,,. •:.*..,1,:-,- \`(N.\4,,44.". k.'4..., . , 41•;41.• • .' • ' '.i-. 1- - T4ttar - .. , 1 ,., . , , • r. _ . • • • rr ;...-%"--;-..,-:,:ic -,_.." .. -...- N:4-.... . s> • - . ,,.. - '' <. 3 -'• a- , _ rg., : . . -Art Walk: smaller scale sculpture along - ' . ....,-A . •• . ./ ,. •-• \ „,-,.... , , •■if. .. t''').'''' • - - ' '''' '' . . •••;! •• - ..N..., ..,.,,,,-;...:••,,,-,:-, _ 1-A/1■0_,„- "•=•, .....z. s,7...: . . , . ----, : $••, t- i • - , ./-/- ,- ,, ,--:- - ,,,. 7- - Main Street ',"--•'' - •=wt. - . ., , . . .,- . J: -..„.„ -,- , \ ,,,, .....-• .,;;• 1!.r.,to ; - -.../:";:•. '' ' • . i • N,/•-•' ''' I . •'' ';',.%- -r \>6 --411;%...: ..'• .'• ' ' " ••t• k ‘z., . ,4i , •,,o, .yif, - . 4,-- • /-' ,/'-.10;„ ,. :-... ,.., - - .. ...,..$4.-. .; 'I.\ •-... • P. .. ---/ ,-,,--/, •.. --z. t.N. •-,-i • ,. -y'tvr .i.;',',,- +a", , ', C'e it, ,„.•','..'. .. k.._4-ill, .. _,..„ -:,,.• ,,..- , ,• : -Enhance functional elements to enrich ,._ . .. . . F: •46,-•N• i.,•: ),,,,,-": -., ' ',1'; . : . - .• ' '' '.,■` -.4-"T';-, '..,*'4„' •'''''4° 's A,- e,t1§,---.4c.,-•,...- - .,.•,,, -• ....0„,,,A. • pedestrian expenence . . • '.4 ... •'''• / ",,, • ., .-- .--- .z . . . . 4;4.. ,..-. , , ... ,.,,,.3 c .. .,... „„••,- „,„.•14,," ,"4 ,,, . ■ , o'. 117' ..,,,, :: .fr." - ' '‘‘,,,•‘,....'*'. '..: :--4.;. •• v .."...1'.,' ''''. , . - /..„,..,. , \\,.,.‘,,••• •?', 4.#-47*, • .. .• . • , ■ . I . . „„•.5...!,0,,,''Pt;• ,:;•....,t/ .---.." s•-•., s :,.•,-101 ; '., , ..A'' -i.--- '7 " • -e;••••.,,:' . . • - ‘' . " ,y•-7;••/2, ! .. '-'*. .;. - .../• /2•...-• ., 0 _ , ., -- •-zS-.•s. .S....' , -/t/' z- ■.' • " GREEN HEART ART -- : lit,„-yr.-,,-•,.. , ',‘..' , `.•40 ... 'y -0. . ,s,`,s• . ,,,,-, •• , r ... •-,„ ,-.., , .• .... '.■•, • ''' ''..... 1 ' „•••• ' ' V A- • . A .„.-1,(- -, „.t..., , . . \ .N. .0 . 4,e, ..,•..., " N, •.1 • ' • • ' 1 *4. . ..),... ..,, . _ . < , '-Art with natural materials and themes .. . • , •-•, ,,,I.••;-1•0 • —, . ' — • =•-• : .N,,f, \\:d4/./;4:4-, .i,I.,,, ..,,?‘...,;':••,,,,,.:"..'Po.:7, \:_,.. .‘ _ -\*K,..,...N: .Ifti*:, , ;,,,..41,i, 14,i.. .\..,; ,,,, .,4.i. ..,.,.. z • ' ,T,.r.......t' .`-' " •• , '''' •- to draw connection to Fanno Creek . . . . . ,.?_ _„ ..,-- - .., /.. - .. - -• - • -/)-•..; ......„...„-„,-,.. • ,,‘.-.. _ ,„...--....... - - -. • ....- . ---.,!,,,,. , ,,,,-- i ,.,.- -.. .14 \ •• \. / 7i'X ... ,, • , ,;• - ' s'.,• . - - . • ,P- ,,,,4_ ••'. .-;;;.• et- . y. ...„;.,-,- , • . -. . . . ,.,*,),./7 ' •?4-7••:"' _4..4/ „ . ._:• ' ' . , ...--_ - V '-", ;!'- • -Environmental themes create and . - . - ,..../ - ,.-- . •A ,. i, . - .--....,....--, ,•• , v _ --- . . . ' • - : , --,-.:14--..• -,. ,. ..„‘ . 4‹. • - •••• • - . • support education and stewardship . . . f(Y.-7-' --- - -.- ..,.-:-:,-.,--.;."-,-'''. .,) . .. - . s 4-'.i. -;., .., , / .. .. Green . - Art that creates habitat, engages all ages, , • - -,.' -"-,•t ,;'---- • : -,• --: , -.-.., . -.1 .• , ..f • •• .• lit3. , ,- ‘ • ."" . 0,. r. i,•„:"\N:.,, \ "'.%••- :..../ • 1V . . • " Corridor • : ",'1.-,,..) ..,4'/' , - ' - . •••, - and can be interactive Urban %. • --- ,,•..--s ..< •, ,-,d,‘t.,.!„ :■,,\ . . , ...--,' i''' . - '- '• --:-.-,-_-;':- ..--1-f ..-- . . v-- „.,. AP" - . ' 1.,,..:-•,- ',.\ ' '. , • „,,-/-4,X.;.1; L Creek ) •; • . •,,T ' ,. :. 1:-...,.... in •-••t'":.-,•-, :', ..__1,,'. • -1r,,, •.$6, .v I.-•.. '\ • • 1, ...'" \*-•' ‘...-: - • Water feature can create a visual link to , . . .• 24 ---4".=- 1..--. - .4,:-% -- ., - 's,, .. 4-,,!.\%, ,,l& •, s' ' .. III 1. . . . r .,., .; -----%..--:--- ,.,-- .,. Fanno Creek . . . , ,•••••••:, w '.., - .- \\,,,,IF^1.'s;,-,..%-f.- :- =-.. ,',, • - :- , - • .,,,•••-; • , . ., _,_-. •,., J.-•"' `i" • ('---• ' (4,,-/A•;..t.■• - • , , • N.'• . *N. • • ;.v... ., .... ...:......: \-, ..:..... ...4•0 ....• .. • ./ ' ' n.. ',....'. .. ,.. .„, ;'.. , /P.111Pirr ." , .., .., '. •. l 'i •. . ....- , • •,I. -,t. V" Co,... - ' - ,, - ' .•. -- Is'"• -- , .. - 1 ,, - - ‘. - , • • \-:- 4■ • - - -' ' • "'-' - '' .• •• .-' •"-. : , • >c -Art supports creation of public spaces _. . , • . - ••• •,,--. .• - :.-..>•-• r- -:" .,,,..i,. . s, 4.• ,, ' i .•,, ..S ',:'4,-, i., .W. Th...... , -,, '... --•,.:. ..., V . 'i -: '4^.. ,>/-:‘•.•'•-•-...e. , ••,.; \',....„ ; ,',,o......: •".: i i , \',-,', for events . , --V - • ; -„ye-- . xiii.-c.- - T. . . --. .,, •,;?.;-; ....-.,,,,-: - .... 7-,..` „.. ..•„ .... . . :-.... .- , , .-7-,-,,.,74 k•-•,.4.!•.;;;;; • ..• ' ... , 1.,•-•:-. •---: ,y'z .;., -'•;\' , ; ":"•-\\,;,;;,.. :-..,. --3p, ;"• . •.. „..z.,, _ _•',....4 ,.1.•-• .E..... 41:••-•-s„.2‘... ..2 . ;,,, , 10,•••,,..!!..".--,,... -,;,• • / • _, „. ..:-.. 2.., , .N • ::- .... t .'.. , z. . _•••.;.N !;,,,,,-.. - .%•; /,_/- ‘0- ".-^Or'i," ., •1. '-'• ''r.. . ., -,•-•;:: ,... \ -,---•,, ..„. • _Demonstration garden to model • ,. , ,,,.-,, ,.. —„--_- ' ' -. - ''-•,.. i 8 ,. - . ' ....- ' t:',•:‘, --,... ., ....,;,.. ,-,/ • • -' - -- -.N '6'; 7 .,, .• ..4' - ; • • -;-.,,,, • . „. "green"practices and enrich pedestrian 1.• , „.; '. ! ..-.' .:•:-.V ' .' 7 ,,,e.',-.''.•., ,? -, jt ., ,....,,, ..... ; ,-,„.-' *- ,..•--.., ,. , ,;.-,.. ,.. ., ...• \,...- -- ,• :Tr - .. .:'.." • •.:"Sit " ' experience 0-1- .- '-'-'-•'- •.:•-------1,0,.. / .. • , ! -...., ,,,,:,-; , „/ A... /,,, •, . • ,,, r . . . -IC ■ :,-,., , 4' ../. ' •.: . ..,,,_.,..7 ' -,-.1-,i....,- ..„...-9k - ,, -• .-, .. . 1,,,,.,...y. „,,- ,. ,• , , .••• s -4, .• . . . , . - , .f■ ' ..... s".; '...\40. 1 ,.ii.c):, -`- - -,- .. • . ..,•-•,'..--- , #Z.* • - - "'''''''-. ...<';•':P". '''''' ;.- I '1..-"t` t ' .-----• .." ; ''` '-...".-' '. • .• ...- •si,...c.i_ ..__._.-1 s:4r ■ • - 4-A. Ci. . C •..\ '... .i.'k DRAFT 6/30/06 . ,.. 1,.' '. "N -••• '' -•-....' " / . /■•. 1 ". - .t •. — '11;; ., . . _ .1:-..•L. "1AME-. .- .NL,,I,...‘ ..g *',A. ,, Downtown Streetscape Pla . . City of Otak. July, 2006 . . . . Design ramewor'l . . MEP mi. A m• NI. L A - • mio _ J _ _ _AINI■_ _ - . . MAIN STREET ART - CIVIC ART GREEN HEART ART , . r---," . 1 , . .. , • ?. - ' -- r,j/ •'' .k • .. 1 • • - - .,. -;...• '‘-'----------..-1,-1. Ifs is ft'PP4 - , , 0" IN- • • • -L.* „k4 . , , . , _ , -„ •'.,•, ' / ' i•-• • .' '''''• r ,,/ ': . . . .. •G . •I I ' • ' ; t- -' , , . , 0... .- .:•,..) ri r■ ..ti,,, ......... , ,1-- —.. '•" —. • • 4 v , ._ •Te.•,,•• --'11-1.L144-1 • •-• . •e ___ ,,.... , • r, r. , . 1, ;, - • ,t- .4 N\., • . •. . , 1-":". .. „ .‘.-,'L ,. • .. .. .' , """"w - • -.:ir -r,...-- ..--- • .:,-...'I •„4----11-_-_141.1411. t.-:,-. ii. . 's\ 1!" . . .----......- . ,...•. i , ''' -'• •.•',' -...!..-.•14' '• ,..... .. tr........._' ' -• l_i t hairowainsig•il... . -1.' •• 1••• .7l.iisit; I•••....,H_. ,, I -..,. . ..... :•'''::' . ?" • • ' •,..I l • j, . ' •4,•ut ) -"'"* O'lletgildrillirr - ,,' ‘110, t , : _ • • • 're '. ' r.e.fri:....,;"'s .. t, \ • ' • ,. • AN. , 1'.;'. ' ,:". ;. .•:' .., • ' l , (• 1 •,..; .., - 1 •• •...„-,-It.:.,- 9-. _,. • _ '-',..• " - 4•■:, •'-• , .- n.,<-• s 1 - •;.., ' ,> ,--',1-.;•A- *. - . ,.., i •-- -- . . . - .4- . ":: .• .• • . .' _ _-- , •. , •,•'z., . , •-,„ , : I • . . - . • . . . . , - ' , /.. h .'A i • • ' -0.41.7.... ,.17 .......... ... • A • . ,... ...... ] N ,\ili.. • --riz-,_ io , . ___ I 2......._ • - ,t.".; - yr-A lir d'>---... ' '41/41t, Il 1 • , - -.- . , ....-...7.-: ic.. , 1. sigs,,4-4,, ir-i. • • 01:. „.„,5.- •"'•..-: -:', a 4,....,- , . ,-, .,,..-.,,.:1;,„rt,,;,1,3-/!;:',:.'it.,,:j. --:* - ' .. ' ,..... ., ,t,.... . /- '--!:4 - li it ii • :, • „ P 'f-N-* --..,7,•.' .,• • ./147.- -- • - —,li-:•*(401119111.__ .:. -,. -, - •-: ' /'•''.•• .: . . . 10. • I . - ....::-.5,.:‘, , .'' ',"-• el '''.."' -,-, ':•,-.,, . • • -. *t- .ts.! 4 - • - .•-',11 °) 1 ...• ft.- •‘•...r.„ N.T....^.! , ,..: i•V"..'''..:0110 ti':1.'..%... .''''''.. fr'''.'jr.AT/0 .■_„,..,_' .- .:.-:,-:. -._ .'..•,...,:`,,,. -.,,„..' .4 ,. t. , .ze:•„,‘,.... ..a."°'•••••:,,,,i ,77.,.......... • NIZil..'. 5i.-z.._... • --•-•:=•::. •PC--:-•-•,‘"Zf•....tts'S7-_,.. -. - . - • •• /1r-" f.•.'4,-•4•.. •• .:,'k• . . • .'• 71.••• .7.'• ..,0yr."t".-:*4'•t ,•^•:„y_ 4111.6 ... MU, ... •:‘,...?"-.7 0 ‘1114. 4- 4.k.'Pf, • •?-•P,-- :. ,-.- : ,,7,..,.-;Ti..„7.,7 ,..,.,1-'-i':.:41...1` 4,-):0. t:-, • --.. . ., ' "11 .,..I., -,.. --,,, ,,. ;,. ,t v,•;: . '4 - 1' 1 ••,`. :....:-.114t7t.-'---.•#•-1.r.••:'44:•&;‘:.:',:t 1 ? . 4 . .":.1. It,i",••-'‘;'...-74.43 .1...t ••• ..... f 5,..1---...-....,-' -, 1 _Immo Immorimilm -- . , - . •..., . . ' --%:-..,•": .,. \- •• , t.--...;,..,....-.4. 1. ,- . - - _. .... • 1 -•.-.:,-,..„,t•-•. • • .4=:- .`,,," 4, .. . .. _ ....... .: .. - - - - _ , „. „......, , . , . .. ) , - '6.- 4 ' j;ZITC:.: ., „Ill 2- ..t• .1 ... • • ''..11.' •'' —7.---..h. : _L_i_.- • - . ‘. •-•:,-......-----5, -.-.. -..-...-_;;..._..›...„ _ - • - .. , _ -- , #t...L,- --•,.....--,..,,g, e,. ,... . ; ,;„,-,....-..--- ., 7, - - • • , ,."-:---. . ., --- _ , • P -••= km." ......--- . .„ .,, , - - ` r•fl!..7-"-.; ..--- ri. .--- • " " . . -1------11 • I - ,. - • l•'•,...-,7 4.'-0- '. 4 4#,,kk. L. _ .. ._ , , --- -. - _ - ...-. - .• . , 7 isks...% 4•2. - I 1._ - . < 1 ' :' -- --- —..... .,. .________-- ------" - -',• - •••••. tii ttlp...:,- --"-"■•••• -...41.---'."-"'=....'"'"-.....--- '''' ..T.': ,..:-.,4,. ori.- 'IT ,..4 ._ ',7, 4,i, ... r-:- ,.):::,:.____ .. 7 4 7 ' ;•1' tl.,•}4..,..2. •..., V. ''• -. .1,....".:. Vt.2.- ,• 7:, -II " \,••••i '-•,;:.• .. . .1 • - 'Is ..I I. -IR: 4F.,'----...• ;Th I 't •• 7...• . , 7 .2. • _, 't• '":"...7•",1 -, ,-.-:_,...:,..40--..77-----.-, , '-..4 • , -. . - '• • - t- , .... ..„_•- ,---- ___ -,...- , . *. *-- :-.-- . I i .:, .11 .- -- - - .. .fl' :t4-... -./.-•- .-t, !. -- , ---•,. • ,..,,„ "•4"`"'". •,0,, - -.:_, -, 4.-.44--; ---.;-• : __,- 4: ,' , . - , • ,; - , .s-.7. 1 __ 7C7...•'''..." - ' '--',-;‘• '' - ."..7•............, . . - - ' - -- ....-- =-' • - ;' . _ . . .•', ...„ . . . • ' I ..., . -' _. .,...,.14, ,„0 „... .. . , ...•... , . "t=.,;1,5,--.'•-• -. A 1____,i • .-.. , -,.•■•' .4:-•-4 ' ..,'. - .- .,,,. ., i - _•" - _! , ...,... , .;.:.'''..... ... /111.1111..-....... '.' _ - . ,. , 1.. ........... . /97-5i ' . • :;, :s/0_,..f.....„,_:41‘....4 4411„ 1 x,_ ,_, f. _ ,...-.„--..„ . . •:: i c wit il■-1 , • ---.Y,---f--.7:1.7.;t. 1.---'-'''-t' , -;-:::- '• ' •' .- --:'. - /if' I r • ri-7."7-:"%of i. , ,,,,........ ii:1:"1, IL.ii,k:::::I,' •..' ... - ::.. ..... '.,-'4 .- - ..... ,--""''''' ‘-1, d -...., • . ,--. -. •■1 - -.,---i'-`r-:‘,"y 4. .:-) ,.....,,,. ,.. ir- — 4 01111011111111 4 - r'....,•01."., , :01'..!"' ■ _ f, . '? 5 i..`. • --; :-. :f.'-.. Pr N etr..=:., . •• "`".---4. , . .• - , --.- . ..1 %.".-- ,t--.::: ','..,•-..-'141. ';;;-• fi 7 --avgoc-----' : ..-4416- . . _ ... -,A,_.....„...,........4„, : :- :::.../ i".,-....;•:'"......;„4•• _-,._., .. / _......--- • .. ?•4 ' -..,-.:...14A.-411',P. Pt,- .•V - . - . . ..---- , . . f .-."'„ ..I. 0 II ,-- .-. -,- , ' 4 ,— , . ._r, • ;SEPAL ii 7"-.•--": 71:'..,‘ 1:::. l . • "11,1,40. . '-' • i , - ,- z-,-,...•:----- %Al •• ' ; ..:' "'. '''■L ,..---'•-,-,-.1 .11.7.., • _.. -, ...v--- -- - - - (, i .,, 3,•■ 1 Tr P 7. 7‘.-- • ' ---• - -. ...... ......... 1. ....• • .." '" i, ''' !I- ;11 . -,,,,) .----' --411 ' • '. - -- lili. ,.. -- - - -, / :-..,-.7 .- +P--.•----_-: --- 11111i:, i .1- ' • --____ - --1 -- ',.. :--- ,z,-“,- ',..- -:;-.....,-. . ...-..,----. . _ ,. • • • .1- .P-0?*11111h,- . - .- .., elm 4. . , - ..,..._ - , . . DRAFT 6/30/06 • Examples of how the scale and character of art could vary among the art districts of downtown. Dow ntow n Streetscape Pla - Exact art pieces will be developed through artist commissions and thematic appropriateness. City of Otak. July. 2006 _ . Design Framework PEDESTRIAN/BIKE PLAN/_, J0 /,. -\. %` ® Primary Pedestrian Routes v,, \ • 7 / ‘‘, 0\ � 1 (assumes realignment of '0 �'� L ' ± Commercial and Tigard Sheets) i 1 M 0 ; _r Inte: :::ection MAR�<ST �: r Impvmen .yam •• /, \ % ,� �• < -, \ , /, �.,,,, Improvements Commercial Street . • (\\ �°'2l ,,� / < ' Realignment(potential) a 0 '° . / ! ■ c ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Primary Bicycle Routes Tigard Street k.4,°`'' Realignme s (potential) "�s'`<'. V �c ,-`- . f,• n ■ j ':�:,, ,� \69,.-4"'::':.(:). \z `• r-, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Multi-Use Paths \ `x/ mss;. ,,p?5� \/ a `\> . 1 o ��Este r �; /�/ •• Bus Stop Improvments ► ^ „.--\~ \\./ o`'��w2 °�o: L� Joy \/��.\ ••a o r;s•• .N ` <\//\ �� •� J/ ; J tr�°s�, \."%. ,'' ; ( New Railroad Crossing ® .r Required l `� • ;7:.; J� �, `J •; j fJ n ■ Existing Railroad .� . � , ° .� �♦ 'SAP .;. >'� ♦• Crossing v • • \'''4- \ • <,/,› • •• • • * /2 / /Ns ., • I <// / iy ., 1 c// / i--1 Downtown Streetscape Plan City of OTAK Jury.2006 TIGARD . Design ramewor 7 . E TRIAN R • I _►..._• `' - '� Guiding Principle The following table can assist City staff in evaluating the overall performance of - '' _ g p • . • pedestrian environment measures,including their effect on the traffic environment. This . ;,. Pedestrian are"design vehicles" of equal standing• guideline applies to local and collector streets with two travel lanes and less than 15,000 6...4.,...._ with cars. Designing streets for pedestrians as ADT. - r 7__ - carefully as for cars requires a basic understanding of All. ,. Ar pedestrian needs. Safe and appealing pedestrian t travel requires the following: - \` - -,, • A continuous walking path f= A feeling of personal safety Pedestrian Performance Guidelines ;' s-, Y''. •-;f 07N- • �,a„ �_ A perception that the distance is not too far or the Pedestrian Traffic Traffic Relative Overall , • ��1'`', r t•�1 r -• time too long Measures �� - '� c=ti = A feeling of walking comfort , Environment Speeds Volume Cost Rating r- �j.;, - - e 0 f'• ,=-r__ 57 - _- - ,. • An understanding of where pedestrian facilities Implement Overall Overall Moderate to -7 .V' are and how to use them Unclear R ,-> `• � �,�.iE___`._ ..: -•::,-,; 7:�.. _ Streetscape Pan improvment reduction High Two of the greatest constraints experienced by Continuous Lower with Low to • Improved furnishing No effect R pedestrians are likely to be out-of-direction travel and Sidewalks Moderate zone • difficulty in crossing streets with moderate to high . , !_ �. : .•.� ;; . volumes of traffic. Block size or intersection spacing Driveway Safety and 1-'�" . 1..I,`- o ' :r.'. ',/ '*' _ between signals frequently creates distances over 1/4 Consolidation continuity No effect No effect Low R , ��• b : q Y f ,__: mile. Perception of distance discourages walking trips High Quality Moderate to ® ►• c~ Comfort and Overall Sidewalk No effect High as R !. -, Out of direction travel can be reduced by: safety reduction ',.4 j i � ' •�/ �;-; �. A fully connected street system Furnishing Zone retrofit I ;. . ; •i. - = ' .;, ° ' — • Additional and enhanced crossing points for Mid-Block"Z" Safety if Lower at ' -'�' . tt '' No effect Moderate S =' �' C,. j—'-'•�j ' existing streets Crossing properly used crossing point � "��""`' _ ;- " • Pedestrian pathways where existing streets do not provide connectivity Mid-Block Refuge Safety if Lower at - ,�. •....�,...•.. Island . properly used crossing point No effect Low S '•• " - _ Difficult street crossings can be improved by: Safety and Lower at Some effect if Low to •■ Shorter distances from curb to curb Curb Extensions used as R • Traffic calming strategies to reduce pedestrian visNlity crossing point moderate chokers , risk • Traffic controls Textured/Paved Crosswalks Visiblity Little effect No effect Low to S ', ;: - • "Road diet"principles used when existing streets Crosswalks (limited use) moderate i+� ,^;v.,'•r...., :r 4 are repaved or new streets are constructed Signage for Visbility and -°' • '_` ,, .� - Little effect No effect Low S = i - Road diet is street design that physically and visually Crossings awareness — ! $ = , -_-_-` � � - reduces the size of a built roadway. These physical . - �"` _ � changes help improve the functional and aesthetic • R=Recommended as generally effective. - qualities and raise awareness of the pedestrian's place S=Selective use effective in certain situations. Not always justified ' u""'�`--. I in the street system. - °,� at: ' ° - DRAFT 6/30/06 Downtown Streetscape Pla City of Otak, July, 2006 - T' I G A R M. Design Framework PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS "T" INTERSECTION 4-WAY INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK CROSSING Guiding Principles . COLLECTOR STREET COLLECTOR STREET COLLECTOR STREET (Unsignalized) (Signalized) (Unsignalized) Collector streets with typical vehicle speeds of 30mph or less and less than 15,000 ADT are Ped Light or--\ -� opportunities for physical streetscape changes to ilk .Signage g enhance pedestrian crossing points. The safest ,� UM ,• `_i' crossings will be at signalized intersections. / r Pedestrian ��n Where traffic control signals do not exist but a 0 3 lik It 111110 Visibility r 1E1 a urb significant crossing demand does exist a Landscaped r Extension combination of measures is recommended. lb.N. In Median 'a• • Potential measures include: lb Bus Stop on Curb • S 9 • s Extension g • Curb extensions for pedestrian visibility and IIIshorter crossing distances li Pedestrian Curb Extension 1...- • Adequate street lighting--N Ili / a- Visibility "Z"Crossing Design __ e s (Recommended Treatment) Pedestrian crossing signage or pedestrian• Pedestrian I11(♦(i(iC■1 activated signals Visibility a-IGU•hiI∎ b s • '•MI Textured - •! • Textured crosswalks to increase motorist Crosswalk • •• _ awareness of the crossing point: 0 ■• 6• �� T • ■ ■ MI -Scored Concrete Curb Extension b [ y Ped Light o�• • • T, -Concrete Pavers Signage -Stamped Concrete I I . - . • -Stamped Asphalt h Concrete Textured crosswalks alone,without other Pavers supporting strategies to increase pedestrian um Illi it visibility and awareness, are not recommended. -� a El ir Better street connectivity is also crucial to providing enhanced pedestrian crossings. . Connectivity can provide new streets with more closely spaced intersections available for Extra Wide Crossing crossing and realignments of existing streets to eliminate offset or"T" intersections. Downtown Streetscape Plan City of OTAK July.2006 TIGARD n Design ramewor t --- 1 TRANSITIMPROVEMENTS \ � � I .<„,,,y,_,. 1 „i„ ,'--"---0-‘,..:, .. .'r—� ,_ _ -JY ” �, ;--:z 5 J \\ 'ice '\\\ 'o ` ` w auk V `' `, _ • • T• re u rs • •r• —• -• t=z. w m O° s; Shelter/Amenities .a, ♦ ,— :.1 i • •� On Curb Extension Mid Block Crossing_ « f •� } ' ®Improvements ■1/ i I Li.\\_,_ __, t® - 1,:1 _ ,1 1, J •'1 • �� . 1i/ i —.__ _- . Fanno Creek Gateway 4^c • • �r�; ;y, ': \\ 1 • -: %: '':'' li 1 1-.„ •�j •�• 9 . , \11\ q..... t♦� i _ Commuter Rail sG N,',.-..-<.:-...,'<,‘,, • • fi .., • I Transit t <. I� Station • • Commuter – Center ;s ,'• •• • Rail - Railroad Crossing • • e pazng • i _ Pedestrian Only• WEST MAIN STREET BUS STOP RELOCATION l' I`. `• • T ' • r Pedestrian ' Island • • • G reen Corridor ------ i- e i �; C: Urban Creek 1 :7',;.tzii. r�—1 •« • 1 ,;','1,It ` : . 1'511,i i.. • 3i� Mid-Block Crossing � • ';' ' ' �' Improvements I,1�At\'‘',v,:, ' IIII ,. • •` Intersection Crossing t• • ' 1 Improvements • . • :, ■ Railroad Crossing Shelter/Amenities • , • •i, Vehicle/Pedestrian 11 on Curb Extension • • • 8 • • •1 El• A •Main St. ; • z-___ Ash Avenue itit ilk_ • . a 1 1 Extension,s,,... ��\�\.. N•• _,• ,� , , el) ,__.....,,,), _ _ Vehicle I ultiuse Pathway \-; ��\�N��` Parallel to Parking cli]o� Redev1opmen' Redevlopment- I Access Alley En /Exit \`\\,->, • •: - �\ o \ via Ash Ave. \ Site(fatu'rej\\\� o Site(f�utt-re)N\ ;MN111 ■...„ , \\�� _ \\�. COMMUTER RAIL ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS �* �\�� Pedestrian/Bike Ac New Railroad Crossings ' N N \ , ' ; Access �— C EAST MAIN STREET BUS STOP RELOCATION Downtown Streetscape Plan City of OTAK July,2006 TIGARD Design Framework TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS Custom Design Bus Shelter Distinctive Pavement from i_ •� (similar to commuter rail shelter) Unifying Materials Palette IN Wayfinding Kiosk NC Or Public Art Space 4 U ili Sidewalk ►,• 41; 1 ■ - ' ..r� 1 re Clear Area I I i Standard TriMet Shelter '. � 9 I I i -r I 1 and Amenities = - _ �•' -�'"�_ *, lio# ..-„a =7-- '„ --Z-777:7-4. °! , 7E77 110# * �� — Angled Parking Sidewalk Clear Area P C fo Pedestrian Crossing Curb Extension C Improvements Loading Area Pedestrian Crossing • Improvements , I i 1 I i I 1 1 I i I I I FM , . 11 b- ,. % ,i1lIII ,I (1 U Parallel Parking I NM ■■ 44.,„ ,% - - - - -D - - ■N aI - OPTIONAL CITY IMPROVEMENTS (Upgrade from Bus Stop to Bus Station) Jam. bh. — RELOCATE AND UPGRDE BUS STOPS (Standard TriMet Shelter and Amenities) Downtown St re ets ca p e Plan City of OTAK July.2006 TIGARD • resign ramewor7 A \ \ I • -- LA - - \- Co m muter rail parking access - to be completed . DRAFT 6/30/06 Downtown Streetscape Pla City of Otak, July, 2006 IGAR � Design Framework STREET LIGHTING PLAN 4-WAY INTERSECTION "T" INTERSECTION "T" INTERSECTION III 0 _ 14'Minimum Light pole 0 '�� Height Allows for Banners �. ■ Light C_ Light and Hanging Baskets ■Light '�f (TYP) �� (T�p) g g / (TYP) �* /■■G■■1 ■■■■0■k 9 UMW 14'POLE lit1 ■■■■■\ b I ■■■■■\ii II��i�i ' t■ �N CIS)1 ii ii or ii ik osi NE 7rio 444 , 0 pm— AL Mg rim Woo le *Ha 'MIMI Film' MIF W 111 lik , ° _ _ ♦ • a LY ilk r ■ ■ Light at East Corner 3 Lights 4 Lights Design Criteria Street lighting is an important unifying element for downtown streetscapes. Light Light 75'- 100' poles are also an opportunity to expand the (Typ.) vertical design elements of the street. Key criteria: • Decorative acorn-style luminaire Opposite Across included on the PGE Approved Street Lighting Equipment list Placement • Fluted cast aluminum poles painted black • Structural wind-loading for banners or hanging flower baskets • Pole height of approximately 14 feet Sidewalk (lamp height approximately 16 feet) • Average illuminance consistent with ORNAMENTAL LIGHT SPACING Table 1 in Street Lighting - COLLECTOR STREETS Recommendations (Technical Appendix) Downtown Streetscape Plan City of OTAK July.2006 TIGARD Iesign ramewor STREET TREE PLAN TREE SPACING Narrow Canopy Trees and Street Lights 20' . -hi- INTERSECTION TREES 4.0, Guiding Principles Street trees should be chosen for their color, Broad Canopy Trees and Street Lights texture,canopy size,ease of maintenance ) and ability to withstand urban conditions. 25' + % Open vase shapes and upright,arching vase Trees the Same Species Distinct Mid-Block Mid-Block Speecies Highlight light shapes are good choices.The canopy Intersections. Different Canopy diameters at maturity correspond to the Characteristics Might Include Spring width of the Right-of-Way as follows: Flowers,Fall Color,Foilage Texture or Canopy Size. R.O.W.Width Canopy Diameter 70'to 80' 30'to 35' ClilL I 60'to 70' 25' Midblock Spacing Coordinated with Where there are conflicts with storefront Street Lights at 75'-100'Spacing signs,windows or exterior structures 25'-30' columnar varieties can be useful. An assortment of tree species helps create variety in the urban environment,avoids the 1 i I ! / I ! + mronocultures,and can enhance the sense of • place. Specific tree species should be chosen from the approved City street tree list and in coordination with the Urban Forester.A —'.r", , 'f, , ;IF �� 25'to 30'is recommended d for public street + + • trees. + ` I1 + �: + , + �� 1 + Angled Parking Can Allow Closer Spacing to �— Maximize the Number of Street Trees Downtown Streetscape Plan City of OTAIC Jut/.2006 TIGARD 1 esign ramewor 7 - �- — — - I • •- DKS Associates Existing Conditions Future Roadway Connections TEANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS 0 -Ash Ave.Extension to Walnut St. © -Ash Ave.Connection Over RR ID - - ._ Key Recommendations 0 .Commercial Realignment at Main St. To NOT ry i' :� 0 -Tigard Realignment at Main St. "' '-, = - • .. " �r The Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP) Main Street v-' 7—,,,__,-;:57..,.--,. 0 -Local Street Connecting Scoffins to Commercial -�. e _ identifies downtown as a Pedestrian District. The (One-way Couplet) ` __ _ Commuter Rail station and parking lot will soon be 0-Local Street Connecting Burnham St.to Proposed Parking _— — _ functioning, a significant intensification of land uses •Structure(One-way Couplet) 0-Local Street Connecting Main St.to Hall Blvd. __� is envisioned and Fanno Creek will become a highly (Right-in/Right-out at Main St.) — used public area. With those positives in the future, -Scoffins/Hunziker Realignment at Hall Blvd. street connectivity is more critical than ever. c4,�,4eG ^dit, �_ sha local ocir proposed anon ppoirtunity Urban or pedestrians and �� :=f�• ' .:_:, bikes. It can also provide vehicle circulation as a one- ° �) i '• - way couplet. However, vehicular crossing of the rail Burnham Street m-=',- • --'":�.:'6 " -_ lines within the GCUC is not recommended since �,;;�„ new crossing permits are very difficult to obtain. r� ��'QC>. QPCF�c `.��_ o°' Ash Avenue is an important connectivity element. O4, 0 -- Extending Ash to Scoffins Street will provide much sr s needed local circulation, as well as a second full Tigard ,�;, 444 , • access to Commuter Rail parking. It will require a ii Center t� S �o $74STransit, __© , Q new railroad crossing permit. The recommendation is ti2d, /� Proposed `/ , . for this crossing to have priority over a GCUC O Parking > �� (', • +d'J. Structure,Oo d'T ♦ , 7 crossing. 0, r s�G� APPROX.1000' ''' -0 <f^� 22i�F� ate.,,,,^ Connecting Ash Avenue and Walnut Street is part of �'d sT HWY 99 �� the current Tigard TSP. Making that connection - provides an additional collector street access for _,, �G�y .,� — downtown. Future traffic volumes on Burnham 0 y9� Street and on Main Street can be expected to be s� , , -� lower with an Ash-Walnut Street connection. . See Traffic Analysis for Street Function Improvements in the Technical Appendix for a full transportation system analysis. 1 _ ^, -7 41111r,•I WA'..:• .4s Ar. 7,t LEGEND Tigard ter.. • gard Street ._ Functional Classification ```� • Existing Proposed -Arterial -':kr" -Collector - -Collector - _ -Neighborhood Route - -Neighborhood Route DRAFT �/�O/o -Local - -Local Downtown Streetscape Pla City of Otak, July, 2006 -i treet Design oncept I NTR0CoUCTIO1\1 $ $ . - ! s c� x �s r Great downtowns need great streets. Great streets need Roadway Area- Traditionally, the roadway area has Street Design Matrix `;.- `:=.:-:1., . •`��= z s ' '1 , great downtowns. Streets provide a setting for shared been designed primarily as a vehicle facility, providing Three downtown streets were a focus for conceptual '`�.'' " `*,` :a:■. `''�:�"-, �, it 4"'," I. • activities—walk,talk, shop, and even be playful. The through travel and local access for cars, trucks, buses, design: ..,_�. •" ,r ,. > ..- Downtown Tigard Improvements Plan(TDIP) and emergency vehicles. Bicycle travel has become •:-` - • • ' g P ( ) g Y Y Main Street " , •:i$; 1O` '. recognized the public value of improving the quality of increasingly recognized and provided for in street • Burnham Street .,, !G °~ streets. The first of the catalyst projects to implement design standards. The importance of pedestrians as a • Commercial Street - ,,',• - the TDIP vision was the Streetscape Enhancement "design vehicle"operating within the roadway should (Only portion �r '- ° '-. • '="'' P p g y (Onl the ortion of Commercial Street west of Main �:' , , ' :..,,� - z Program, a priority leading directly to the Downtown also be fully recognized. Street was considered during conceptual design.) -"' -:• -. Streetscape Design Plan. Early work sessions with the 47;12',; , • =, .x sit'-`‘, �. ��` .. / {. • Streetscape Working Group (SWG) identified important At a minimum, pedestrians cross multiple streets in the A design 'S '` =' ' P g P ( ) P � P P gn matrix was developed to identify key ;:- ,� ��' .- =�� -*-� - idin principles for design: �,_�. � . , . guiding p p gn: course of a single walking trip. The volume of moving streetscape enhancements. The matrix included future 1.`.:. � _� ;��., • Enhanced pedestrian environments are critical to vehicles and the speed at which they move are universal local street development that will serve primarily v ?• , • , S, r .�•:/ . •an urban village feel constraints for those trips. The roadway and its border residential uses. Other streets where redevelopment has = .' •' . ., \* t '�� • Visual attractiveness is essential to downtown area must provide clearly understood crossing areas for a strong mixed use or retail focus will likely draw from appeal pedestrians. the design matrix for Burnham Street. °; ` J �k `� '3 • Safe and comfortable access is essential downtown se:;.` ,:" . •�.:�� ; appeal :r € Green Street Design �_ ,£rs • ' '� • • Opportunities to make green connections •� _i_ •- -- s: Green Streets are an important opportunity to reinforce . '+;� .--,j,, y ' themes of the Tigard Downtown Improvements Plan ' _ ,-. ' - Y— directly reflect those recommendations and a consensus Safety,Comfort, and Access y such as"green heart" and"green connections. While Y Safety, comfort, and access were fundamental themes l Green Street design is primarily the use of innovative of the SWG. Full implementation will require developed during SWG work sessions. In order to techniques for stormwater managemen. However, that amendments to the current Transportation System Plan. achieve those objectives, it is useful to regard is not its sole characteristic. Streetscapes can provide streetscapes as having an"anatomy."Each part of the other"green"elements: Future Roadway Connections—Recommendations Street Walls- An important element of streetsca a is were provided for future roadway connections, anatomy provides more than one function. When the P P Safe and appealing pedestrian environment P Y• parts function well,the whole is healthy. The parts of found just outside the public right-of-way. Street walls Multimodal travel choices including the eventual extension of Ash Avenue and the.- that anatomy can be described as the Border Area, the are what you perceive directly beyond the sidewalk(e.g. Maximizing opportunities for trees and Scoffins/Hunziker realignment. There was limited - - Roadway Area, and the Walls. border area). Good architectural facades make landscaping discussion of future roadway connections with the handsome buildings as well as handsome streets. Visible SWG. No consensus was asked of them. Project team doors and large windows are inherently pedestrian- Visual and physical connections to public and Border Area The border area is effectively a public g y P open spaces recommendations anticipate substantial increases in landscape from the curb to the building front or friendly. While the design character of architectural traffic with the downtown redevelopment envisioned in line. The border should provide comfortable street walls was not addressed by the Downtown the TDIP. Continued discussion regarding property P Traffic Analysis for Street Function Improvements g g and relatively quiet space to walk and socialize and Streetscape Design Plan, the impact on walkability and implementation of roadway connection Y q P Recommendations were developed to improve P Y provide direct access to buildings. Three distinct and traffic speeds should not be underestimated. recommendations is needed. P g functional aspects of streets and integrate roadway continuous zones are needed: furnishing zone, improvements with overall design themes. pedestrian zone, and frontage zone. Each zone has an A continuous planting of street trees in the border area Additional recommendations include: P g Recommendations were based on evaluation of existing important function in supporting pedestrian activities, can also act as a street wall. Enclosing the street is an Added left-turn lanes for all legs at each of the P PP g P conditions, review of relevant planning documents, g slowin traffic, and creating downtown character. added value of street trees in addition to thematic three proposed four-legged intersections. slowing g Tigard. analysis of future traffic conditions, and work sessions qualities of a visually green heart for downtown Ti g with the SWG. The full analysis has been in included in • Pedestrian railroad crossing at the Green Corridor a1 ,;, .i j,q 1 :rr :_'•; " }• ' :�' _': .:;.M 4 _ _ a Technical Appendix to the Downtown Streetscape Urban Creek h - - �- I ' J 4 t Design Plan. New traffic signals at Main StreetBurnham 7"�1°� f r _ . ° t.„ _,- t `l}, . Street/Tigard Street and Main Street/Commercial idg I �' 4,4 r Street when warranted by future volumes after :.',- t= ., ` ..... t: Q_ .- " j A - i I Recommended Street Function Requirements such as .3 _ "�'''' %�- '° � ° realignment of Tigard Street and Commercial • __ _ right-of--way width, sidewalk widths, on-street parking, Street. ` and bicycle lanes—were subjects of extended !At' Y - p discussion with SWG. The design concepts for Main Street, Burnham Street, and West Commercial Street Downtown Streetscape Pla City of Otak. July, 2006 T I .°el ■ R treet Design oncept h. - 6. LA A N. ■ MAIN ST. BURNHAM ST. LOCAL ST. ON-STREET PARKING _ - -- l Parallel parking ' _may h . 1,1:- ,_ Angled Parking i , - _2 SIDEWALKS .2-,.,:,,,, „ Sidewalk width as an objective ,, L .„,... , , ..,_ _,,..., Outdoor seating/conversation Retail focus/window shopping III "I: . Distinctive paving S a . ,Curbless design options 0 441 ' "°`, . yrr '' SIDEWALK FURNISHINGS Vie+ 3 t High level of furnishings is '�'�' .. `1 �; .',:, F: r ?• Complementary to rail station I' 11,. , . Historical character 1' ' ` Bike racks F ,+. Benches - _-C--� Drinking fountains/ ' .; r Trash receptacles 1G} , _ Bollards,trees grates, decorative drain covers, etc. yr:1 - ii 4, LIGHTING • Pedestrian scale (15'or less) ii ( ; Classic/Traditional Style 40 ` Option for hanging baskets/banners 1.55 _ � r'." --, ,1 Special needs for performing arts center 1455 40 Accent lighting for art/public spaces 100 *Cr ':...e.;..0. : ..au a.' w= 1 r.fA LANDSCAPING "0`° ° '""' � 7 Deciduous trees/canopy �} � ,,tip� � ��':-IIy Native species 4 aW . • ai , - Median tree planting ,-0.a � _- - z., 1,,, ! Planters and window boxes . ' Green street strategies 40 r ------- _...` �I _ ,�-cam. •. c 'i �.,� PUBLIC ART/COMMUNICATION 4::- g} , =' Wayfmding system 1� j z `'r Information/Exhibits 411G Performances/Events 11.p• gip. f•,,, ti Reflect broad downtown themes 41p. ' f Downtown Streetscape Plan \ Recommended 11111 p Optional Not Required City of otak, July, 2006 T I GAR ■ 1. treet- Design oncept MAIN BURNHAM LOCAL ST ST ST CURB TO CURB Landscaped Median › t; w• ..j Definition �-- " `` A Green Street is a collector or residential street Permeable Roadway Paving* .717.4 4 q �-.,� - within the downtown area. The street right-of-way Tree Canopy(shade& stormwater) Ilk Ilk 41k ' dimensions may vary from street to street or from Light Colors (crosswalks) �, �►- block to block. What will distinguish these streets from other streets is the opportunity to consider the Native Vegetation Ci 1 entire right-of-way for operational and design •f ' ` treatments emphasizing the key elements of a Green ii:., P g Y - „�:�. Street. • - BACK OF CURB '*-' a Purpose * r ' � .�`� , .• -. . • i`' -n' Green Streets are an important opportunity to Permeable Sidewalk Paving ?{{■ . }C•} — p pp ty - j -' "7,7i-,•;;.•;,----,:_.-'`. `` .. .- reinforce themes of Tigard Downtown Flow-through Sidewalk Planters Mb IS l � ';:; o - ; ” ' ' r" - '' I �,'� i . - E Improvements Plan such as"green heart" and "green Flow-through Curb Extension Planters F .ry , » g ,, connections. Complementary objectives might Tree Wells X•G• . '° % # �. 5�, , ''� '_,i include: r,.a - ,i. : F t '', . '4 1 r rs ? • Reflect community desire for a sustainable Light Colors (sidewalks &plazas) 4. ;J ,� la 4 ,�;;. , ` —t .. 1 "`'`�- ; , a . `""" • relationship between naturals stems and the Y Tree Canopy(shade & stormwater) II 111 ��''.`;,', ,"'-`�w '. _ �4 urban environment .e� �,;� • Create an environment attractive to pedestrians Native Vegetation • *Cr *I> 'rim_:'; ,.,. ,.; _ _�'.� . - -•' - • -. • Preserve a sense of open space in an increasingly . `_� developed environment • `-`•-- ' • Identify opportunities for an integrated 'S demonstration project for green design--street, ' ~---6.4- site and building. .- „';y�,.� _ Key Elements =-` ® .° Green Street elements are not limited to techniques *Permeable paving performs best where soil types typically have good ..,._ r. 4;--- -77 for management of stormwater within the street infiltration characteristics. Subgrade modification with sub-drains or open- _ right-of--way. In fact there may be existing or future graded gravel reservoirs can compensate for poor infiltration for permeable '• r"3-4479Aer.e streets with limited opportunities for innovative 6�°: , -- f Af stormwater management. Those streetscapes can still : ;° <-.= _v,. . '.E- Q` ('•,`• :'.w Lis/. be targeted for elements of a o key elm Green Street: ':..t,; : ' -= ,,<_ mod .a . • t.- � '� ' n • Safe and appealing pedestrian•.,. <X Apt '�'= - _ .� ,t, PP g P an environment• � • ��o t`�� '--c'' i A,, �}� Multimodal travel choices E�'°:; .rt ,<ti :,-~ A,� d Maximizing �� <� -�: `.., ��= = �: - • i ! zing opportunities for trees and \ ,ts: \� ' : `,:t-' apt= r:-.i. , landscaping 1 if r r i ' 'I r '� j • Visual and physical connections to public and • �. � . open spaces • Save what is special or unique Recommended I. Optional ' Not Recommended Downtown treetscape Plan City of Otak, July, 2006 TI AR treet Design oncept • :■ . ■ : - - • : ►i IA TYPES APPLICATION HOW IT WORKS BETWEEN CURBS BEHIND CURBS Green/Vegetated/Eco Roof On top of structures within the right-of-way, such as A series of layers is built onto the roofs. The top most NO YES covered bus shelters or benches, above ground utility layer consists of low growing vegetation that can store enclosures, or awnings that extend into the right-of-way. water in its leaves and roots, absorbing up to 70% of the stormwater that falls onto the roof. ^ Q►�+�`~ - �\ �'.. - i 3 -_--•- 'l nr Vii' - ✓ '� -,•,, ..1.c... - .. -,-z.....-,-_,_ '. ..„... mil. i..,` all - -•.4 - ' ►e i .'r.'ta.{ - '•� - •a '-. »�• - -' .+M{.' '` 4, ��y t :- i y l;.'� -iii 'ti T s* '♦ • �- r Al..l . ..--- /-1 -, 44 -,t •�..� •~• ' ! • Rainwater Harvesting Capture and re-use of stormwater runoff for landscape Collect runoff and convey it to a storage facility during YES YES - , irrigation in the right-of-way. Runoff captured from the wet season to be re-used for irrigation during the dry surfaces within the right-of-way. Runoff collected from season. Harvested water can also be re-used for non- the roof of an adjacent public (or private)building would potable purposes in a building. - be cleaner and may be more feasible for re-use. —.a• �� -;46,4 Surface Pavement ef-_ r �tr_t. ,_ t /GeoSrid.-- \.��\.� i l l i jl',t�A,?,t. fit - lk. i' �1Sv7Z + . ~'as ; .7.°. Ftam.tnrrJCeli« late!- '1 �t \\\,,,,\S"� ' , 1r;,;,f, � v,..'...' ,, - 1_ f .1. f t t t t 1 t t t�1 10 t�rF rrr r,,,.,i�,,,„ - - _ (at 1 ..�•a ,=+ - , G t FM,r fllfe r •• Filter fabric �t S ' �. • ) Gcosrtd _. Permeable Paving Nearly all impermeable surfaces within the right-of-way Pores created in the paving system allow water to pass YES YES could be constructed using a permeable paving materials through the surface to the subgrade and promote such as permeable asphalt, permeable concrete, or paving infiltration. Depth of subgrade material depends on needs blocks. In the Portland Metro area, this is commonly being for stormwater storage. Overflow conveyance systems can applied to sidewalks, parking lanes, and parking lots. be used to reduce depth of subgrade. :LZa is.:a4 •' a•�a 1.1l :L y`r Ji --�� i� � ' yL �i �Z r - — S = * * r .4.4 t t ;. ' 4's+r a --"4 t ." 7F 1 .... -; .� t: .c � AVIr Y'>er "r '1 L*. 4 4 , • . i 4. r �� !'�'� �rY�,'�/ ,fit"`+- ),'i4 - ' — "��1' }• t�'._'42-6011,410‘i.,ISV-r';'1,=i. ,r1 F y ,-.:/'�r-j-; 1 i _ - \ `i`el 4 :+' s� tsr•' �•1 `...'" q � • i'7c' xk i _ r 2 1 �,4 . 7�ec Downtown Streetscape Plan City of Otak. July, 2006 TI GAR • Street Design Concept E ► ■ _ • ;_ u ATER TYPES APPLICATION HOW IT WORKS BETWEEN CURBS BEHIND CURBS Bioretention Fits into a variety of containers. Containers can be swales or Makes use of engineered or amended soils to promote YES YES . depressions graded into a landscape area or(for more urban infiltration and evapotranspiration of stormwater. Must make areas) can be concrete planters, a median, a tree well, or other use of an overflow conveyance system in areas with poorly architectural feature. draining soils to., manage larger storm events. • 3:7 3 r L 1 f i .n - �4-: R, .l� ��. ... ..,..4 , , ,,...__r4 .4 ftb., . ---- ,Aim. _ , rit- — i • .' l,<.e'-'i N.,....:-.,„.— 4 _.,„.,--,.., . , II, -, , , - , - : , • _ ci,,,,, ,/ . , . . ‘,.. A i Ili 0•.... - , ts,,,,,,p,-...i:- VIPWIFN _ • - ��' • ✓' a, - __„ i�. /It i , . ■. '�w �\•� - / Berl. r t �_ ! _ Grass or Vegetated Swales Can be difficult to locate in an urban area due to land Flow through channel that uses channel geometry and YES YES availability and limited right-of-way. May need to vegetation to control velocities and settle pollutants. Can acquire additional right-of-way or drainage easements to provide conveyance and treatment of stormwater. Landscaped construct. Similar to a Bioretention system if modified to areas can be designed to function as stormwater swales. promote infiltration. • • • s. . 442.1 a tie ?•' )".11;i4:' : )'° li'744''' i 47 71:11111.:141:.',i,s;,J.,1:4,7::,,,4.3i...: , ______ t lir 41% . pht.:721..... .4 ... n4,. . 4.7"ki . . -7 Notes Infiltration in Downtown Tigard Traditional Conveyance Systems Maintenance • Soils in the downtown area are mostly comprised of silts Green Street stormwater management facilities will not Maintenance efforts required by Green Street and clays—hydrologic soils group C with some D.This capture all storms. They need to be designed to overflow stormwater facilities have not been tested locally over a suggests relatively poor conditions for infiltration of during large storms exceeding the capacity of the facility and long period of time. Performance of these facilities will stormwater into the native ground. Optimal design of underlying soils. The overflow should be sent to a controlled depend on their maintenance.Additional upfront costs sustainable stormwater management facilities should be location, such as an existing or traditional storm sewer will be required. Long-term requirements can be able to handle at least the water quality design storm system. reduced through the use of conservative design equal to 0.36 inches of precipitation in 4 hours in assumptions. downtown. Downtown Streetscape Pla City of Otak. July, 2006 _ �__� treet Design Concept No L1 � , • ■ - ,A 1 i_r--1=� \ \\ \' • Project Description - - �` \` l� Main Street will likely be the primary retail street for Gateway i �1 i ! ,\ --' downtown. Gatewa intersections and high visibility from _ p\\\�/ I the highway will become visual landmarks for downtown. -----Y(� -�i\\%® 1®11 ! 4,_I -4 -4 ,4,_i-'f- y:. . �_ fir`- 1 Pedestrian Crossing \-----N\------ .A, \ \ Streetscape enhancements will include: ©©fi ! , 1 4 , _A . s -. . - ! - --- Improvments(tYP) \4 ® !R'° _ il, • .4 A, a,,1 1 i Nil •■ 1 -� t 1��1� e, ,_ ® ® 1 m ®_ Q:; : ® f�, q _.1 .5 -�� •„Ir ai>>>�� ,, _ )y, _II'•11 • Continuous wide sidewalks on both sides of street coo go- 1 '1 - ® — m ® • Increased on-street parking through driveway consolidation �` i ° �.ig r 1* III\ ■.--21-1* ; ; -` --'' % '' ; '.1,k • Design elements linked to Commuter Rail Station • Fanno Creek Overlook ' �- �'Y ;F- "`v'4. I i I r__, L a ` • \ • Street trees,landscaping,high quality street furnishings (future development I s,Y.`','r, x ( \t - -- F l ; pending potential ` :at t.� .- ' - ' �` Coordination with other projects roe acquisition) L , "�'�Y'} 1 property �N ) .0 --._� _ - The City is encouraged to investigate opportunities to ,151:`0 ' I AFB (_'-_ �� '�"w�'� I� ' e emOIIStratiOII'~ i _ -� Fanno Creek _ ° u'x' f Pedestrian and 1 ; t' • share project costs and/or ensure functional and thematic Public Area rye 1 Retail Oiiented____------- "' den �- ' ■ - consist as downtown improvements a �" �` 1 \ + 11' consistency town take place: ��",.'� ' Streetscape *4-51�' t� � +� •�,� `; � .a � __- r _y �, o ��=�11,a ' 1 I • On-going dialogue with TriMet regarding Main Street �a =2,'o 1 ® , �.` --: \ . ` Commuter Rail station \ / 1 �-� 1 qt. -�` E • potential intersection improvements at Main■' r .._. _�_ 1 PO / i' Street/Hwy 99/Greenburg Road d®/ ....... 11:- .' .- 1 ■ • Fanno Creek Regional Trail and Public Area • Realignment of Tigard or Commercial Streets at Main • • Street Potential Phasing • \ : 1 I WY 99 HL Potential phasing could be considered if funding were not 1 Pedestrian Crossing _ available fora complete rebuild of the street. Complete _-.-_ -_-.-----Improvements(typ) -- ---'-- \ . -... ___._____ _ _ _ — rebuild assumes pavement grind and overlay,utility �� P 1 :. 1 -----� �, c-.--L . _ -_\ 0 , ■: improvements and streetscape. VI e .- 1• . \ 1 l�� -3_ , + Gatewa `� i f_ -- �� _1' j� — _ ' vii \ -A • ,,�_ _ + ►►W ►t�p ii Option A-Greenburg Road/Hwy 99/Main Street intersection TI �_ _ - 4 , ,V44� _ _ 1.1 , E ateway r �• « *;1, = ' _ improvements to Scoffms Street with potential Gateway ® ,�� ” � ' -�%��- IIIIIIIII ��"'�'�-- � development. "11111 ® 'Ilit .■ rir .. .r. 1 I « / IIIII Y ; t \ , K././ ,' __ Option B-Option A plus sidewalk improvements from Scoffin ■� 1 ` :4 _ ,1 malt _ 1 ft:_ \ ; ` / ,' ;� )' Street to the Fanno Creek Bridge. Sidewalk improvements would't t� � I '\` 4.. ill:� � � ' _ i \ y � - �;; ;, j include new trees,lighting,paving and furnishings. ��t _-�' .•- _� ___ r Option C-whole street reconstruction to Burnham Street.---\ :`� , 1 :. I y. \ ; 1 ` Reconstruction from Burnham Street to Maplewood as a Green Street J L__ ; demonstration project would be deferred to a la phase. a ' ,�:. \ ' -- .- g i , .a - \ '` ,�:a ; ---- - _ ,` ter ' i Estimated Construction Budget: $x,xxx,xxxx ® t ;Au.� • 'i_ . Downtown Streetscape Plan • City of OTAK,July,zoos TIGARD . . ,_..\ . • treet Design Concept MAIN STREET SECTIONS Section A-Two Lanes SECTION B Existing angled on-street parking on one side of the (Near Term) street is retained with a change in the parking angle to approximately 45 degrees. Changing the parking ' I , :}: angle maximises sidewalk widths. Loss of parking r spaces can be recaptured by closing and/or s&, consolidating existing driveways as part of � � 'fir-` redevelopment. Design parameters are Functional Classification: Collector • t AIM -, ,�:, y ROW: 80' Through Travel Lanes: 2 SECTION A 7,' 11' '12' 11' 8' 12' Median: None Sidewalk Travel Median/rum Travel Parallel Sidewalk On-street Parking: Lane Lane Lane Parking Parallel parking on south side, 45-degree ..ppyy_� rutme ' �K-/'•fit.• 12'sidewalk ''13"'• °"'„`I w lk parking on north side : = ` Q 48' D Bike Lanes: None Q Sidewalk Width: 60'R.O.W.(75'+/-Future) 12' or greater with tree wells/stormwater •:,' .J �: planters II Pedestrian Crossing Improvements: Curb extensions, iii marked crosswalks(or SECTION B (Long Term) Section B-Three Lanes 12'or greater 19' 12' 12' 8' 12'or greater ,L. � , .r,.:� y `:' In the three-lane section the third lane functions only -�,1• '.• may.; Sidewalk 45 Degree Travel Travel Parallel Sidewalk -•7! as left turn lane. Traffic volumes, existing Parking Lane Lane Parking `' ' intersections and driveways will require maintaining a 4 t: -", - ' `-�` three-lane section. If increased Main Street traffic 51' D , `'# ,r----.'vim cannot be mitigated, then increasing the length of the xr - Y so'R.O.W. three-lane section may be unavoidable in the future. All,*1 Alternative vehicle routes into and out of the ,famlia, .awita, mar; IBM; tiara! downtown area, eliminating driveways, and realigning ]z'or greater 8' 11' 12' 11' 8' 12' the Tigard Street and/or Commercial Street Sidewalk Parallel Travel Median/Tum Travel Parallel Sidewalk intersections will be key strategies. The near term scenario reflects an existing 48' D constrained right-of-way condition. Eliminating Q 80'R.O.W.(Future) D parallel parking on one side will allow development of a continuous sidewalk. With redevelopment, the full 80 foot right-of-way can be obtained. Parallel SECTION A SECTION B SECTION A parking can be restored and the sidewalk expanded to the recommended 12 foot minimum. C . ;s � ~ � ls►�r . : ; r ,...,. --., ,, , II / - - illitc 't 'if ' 7' ' -''' ' . L 4,4' .4'...,..,:v . 'r.' - ''. - + Downtown Streetscape Pla DRAFT: 7-17-06 City of Otak. July, 2006 TI411AF_ treet resign oncept MAIN : GREEN STREET PLAN ---____-_____------------ I - Project Description 1 _____I • _ Main Street can continue to demonstrate commitment to HWY 99 --� �� [ I sustainable development. Burnham Street to the —f `- -- I Maplewood Drive could be funded as a P Green Street \\\\ • �- i ---7 - demonstration project featuring stormwater 0 - ._� ' «.' F : , f Green Street management. Crreen elements could be:• 1 ST Q �� • \'< -,),,. '�''` ■ Demonstration Project • g Planters -� ® � Flow through stormwater i t � ® ® tea. „"<'e, G _�,, • Street trees in landscaped tree wells rather than grates�� • (tors_��,. - „� Y 1 )� ;� )1 • Visual and functional connections to Fanno Creek � 1 lam °" .�„ _ ® Public Area '"-;<,:1 R , t�' 1�� , ' • Interpretive signage and/or public art Li FANNO CREEK GATEW•Y r-------\ 's r, __ � `,�� Y' �` r : ____,,-4) I. ` • A curbless cross-section 41, '-- 1 • ` ` (` L--- -- `� � The dem protect w d ikel r r`` '%'.. ©.'":". 4;:-C:'';:..':'\1;44:`. ';z')f ' , .; ,; onstration our 1' y equine \:11(liti. t 7 �� ° ' ` approximately 4,000 - 4,500 square feet of planter area. � s uare fe _ �:;;: - Pedestrian Connection \• ii _� The remainder of Main Street would be treated with •`` , /� A �_ ,,,..„ I ' ' • mechanical measures such as StormFilter cartridges, ,,/ �- .� providing improved water quality with less �. �' �,i�� - sidewalk/curb extension space required..i.,:s.s ay- if ..4:14-,,,,1 ),. ); �7 1 - �„, Implementation ��" "'� a • z s®S` �'c� o o c� �Oa 1 U NON , Regional funding sources for Green Street ''s 1 3. �y ° ` �, ,C:2 0` . :': demonstration projects such as Metro and Clean Water Resource protection,natural materials and interpretive Q d Services should be explored. art/signage will complement the Green Street concept Potential Phasing STORMWATER PLANTERS CURBLESS DESIGN OPTION Green Street improvements could be a stand-alone = k r . .: ` ^ ,��. , .t _. project for developing the Green Heart of Tigard.• _ 'e:'r, t..: ; ,�.d.�' .' Potential phasing of an overall Main Street improvement et �, .;.;:- plan should be coordinated with street improvement is • :. s .?c- •,,, "Y ,.v ' t. ' " �.=` ' a ',;,L „1„,i . �! °' �+ projects between Burnham Street and Scoffins Street. 4'� —"- --!1_,' _ .. Coordination with Other Projects •� - r �r' ��' �- _ Opportunities to share project costs and/or achieve f rig t A � '_, x ; �' maximum functional benefits at the most reasonable ta, ,� - :" cost: • Fanno Creek Regional Trail and Public Area - � • Major redevelopment project(s) FI* Sidewalk sales,vendors,street fairs, Shared space for vehicles and pedestrians. • . • • - pedestrian activity are"green" However,increases in traffic volume may • Future realignment of Tigard Street to Burnham Street ° negate this potential benefit. Estimated Construction Budget: $x,xxx,xxxx Visible,functional Downtown Streetscape Plan City of OTAK.Jury.zoos TIGARD Street Design Concept MAIN : GREEN STREET PLAN • Evaluating Costs Sustainable stormwater management facilities are not always the least expensive engineering solution. However, space is already limited in an urban Raised Planter Sidewalk Planter environment, and land is expensive. Land value with Seat Wall (30' - 35' SF) required for traditional stormwater facilities is often (800' SF) .. overlooked in reporting facility costs. If land value is in 1. figured into the equation,then sustainable �� stormwater facilities make better financial sense. -r:• /� /\ ` l`\ l`� `� Variable Costs �. r !� ^---- �- J �� 4 The cost to construct a sustainable stormwater �\ ` �� ::= facility is as variable as the designs themselves..fr__ � Major factors that influence the cost include soil AD' b conditions, construction material palette, and 1 50-55'(typ) 1 whether the facility is part of new construction or part of a retrofit situation.As an example,the use of FLOW THROUGH CURB EXTENSION PLANTER FLOW THROUGH SIDEWALK PLANTER concrete walls to forma container would be more -- expensive than using an area that is enclosed by a - curb extension, especially if the curb is already a - necessary part of the streetscape. Sidewalk and Parking Impacts Flow through stormwater planters are the recommended strategy for a Main Street Green Street demonstration project. Selection of specific . design treatments should consider other sidewalk • uses such as outdoor seating, storefront displays, as Raised Planter Pervious Paving well as maintenance of adequate on-street parking. with Seat Wall (Optional) Parking Egress Paving Closure or consolidation of driveways provides (340-350 SF) (Impervious) opportunities to construct curb extension facilities, Stormwater Sidewalk Planter which will likely provide the greatest functional �- - , b Tree Well (45'- 50' SF) r (` b (12'-IS' SF) benefit for the least comparable cost. _AL. , abo AIL. 111111 11 mii 40'-45' illie. ,,.,,_dimc11111/12%1111.1.2tisill, imiLissonsiiiii EMI I 30'-35'(typ) 1 4______I. 16'- 18'(typ) • FLOW THROUGH CURB EXTENSION PLANTER FLOW THROUGH TREE WELLS FLOW THROUGH SIDEWALK PLANTER Downtown Streetscape Pla DRAFT: 7-17-06 City of Otak. July, 2006 TIGARIII. • treet resign oncept BURNHAM : GREEN STREET PLAN _ I i i __i:__-.__-- 1 Project Description -- J _— _ Demonstr_a_tion ,1 ; • 1 - � 1 The preferred alternative of the Streetscape Working Garden - ! 1 I IA I Group. Burnham Street between Ash Avenue and Main - - I .I? i f AshA nu' 1 ++ — O I I i 1 Ve 1 Street will be an important retail or mixed-use street for — >._r ' - El Realignmen' 1 ® '"� ° '= downtown. It will also provide access to the Fanno ;,. ( ! Potential Stormwater'; Ili Roundabout) 1 Creek Public area, a future performing arts center and P �r •T. ! ��'kJ�-w , ?: ; BURNHAM ST. I Planters(typ) I I I connection to the Green Corridor Urban Creek. 710A: 1%i>9 gp°�� , �`11110NoiJr-11 1 ,1--1 1 Ir-Ilik lr�lriivri 'irQarl=ioliir-1- , 1 .�ry r.IF-Inglomim iii, _ 1 -*_!!!j , }_ '�' Streetscape enhancements will include:4„ 410. pi,a2 na4 ggeft 11111" -. ►-` �`•§1.0 r,+•„"'` 4ill n, ,1111 .1 itki 1L X1111.1.1. 11. 1A 11111141+_Aill� �.4kedi�a a0a`:11�i�`id - ' IIIlb'.Atild. 1J ij r • Continuous wide sidewalks on both sides of the street a� • __ ,40,,.‘, i i ' I I , , ± • On-street parking through driveway consolidation or -- ; Pedestrian/'Retail 18'Sidewalk .� ! I i 4 1 G / I 4, i Mid-Block Crossing i . ■ a closure c; ®"� Oriented S. etscape On-street Parking E' , Improvements i a • ! .a 1 . -- ,;�'® / v �P 0 1 • Street trees, landscaping, high quality street furnishings ,� Pedestrian ! ; 1 • Mid-block pedestrian crossings• 1 11 Connectio C•/ ! A roundabout at Ash Avenue I• c.'" .r- b 1 • Stormwater planters as a Green Street feature 'E I j > r • i i ! : Implementation r J 0 i i 1 Right-of-way acquisition will be required along the f E ' _...--.--...___—_.----.-___.__a ■ entire street length. At present, Burnham Street improvements are scheduled for completion in 2008. Potential Phasing j I 4 The City's decision was to build all elements in one • 1 I �� I � ; i • �` l� phase if right-of-way acquisitions are successful. _-_.-.--.-- I ' 1 ' Coordination with Other Projects • 18 Fire Station Tigard Water � i 1 Distract Gateway ' /////////// _ To the extent possible,the location of specific . i iA j �'1 ," streetscape elements should complement future I I i4 �;, r ®5 development of other important downtown projects. >• CI . 1 f Mid-block pedestrian crossing points, on-street parking, iI Potential Stormwater Potential Stormwater 7/ ® t�r► i 4 1 �,r and stormwater treatment planters are important i I Planters(typ) I Planters(typ) t0 ■n ! ■ I 1��T+�rti+1►,�rT.TT�rT�rT 'arT►.+►=r►T�*rT�Tir7r=rrTibT �, <� ! 1�`- i► ; elements. Projects include: 16 .]� ,ln --�)....-- ----- — ® - -_.-_-..._ -_ • Fanno Creek Public Area l+fil. 1�Y s 1 li►1 1 1 L L L li►1 ,'Lrf�� \\ 1 �► . ar . .. ar �i l.,..l ..- ,., . ar it N. Performing Arts Center 1 • Green Corridor Urban Creek I i1 Mid-block Crossing 12' Sidewalk , • ' Improvements On'street Parking \ I 1 Estimated Construction Budget: $x,xxx,xxx [ I Landscaped Medi• . i i I i Downtown Streetscape Plan City of OTAK,July,2006 • TIGARD • • treet Design oncept BURNHAM : BOULEVARD PLAN ! • I ; ' I Project Description '- ? __- J ` _-` - —_ I This was not the alternative preferred by the 1 - I ;, i 1 1 r j ;1 Streetscape Working Group. It emphasized a - DdmonstraIi I ;410! I / 1 t 1 I landscaped median to create a boulevard street as a - ! Garden o �., , z 4 r I ! ! !i long gateway into downtown. The themes of green/ /I e,. ,. I I I I heart and green connections would be emphasized by �� +�`� fie Landscaped Median I I I the maximizing the space available for street trees and L : . + I I ! landscaping. : 4V.41 +� i. 4,• Al;T 1l' ♦/*1 1*/s1S •lilt/SA4.1i. �1w10,/i1+ 1 1 y p g r�!'� e +►-.j --. m ee e e e e e e . e^� ^ �' m � ?� �r Traffic calming would result as the median was i` * " + .; ai.1 /4. t!=a&•46.- ...,:•46. 4. ,.;,,,:,�.A41 „ .4./L.,.[,r,r.i.i;, ,,,,. 414,4 1411 ,,,,,,--! ` .'1*+' ' +✓ i•✓ a✓ &r- completed incrementally with redevelopment or other ' i /Midblock Pedestrian On-street Parking I I 1 I 1 Bike Lanes opportunities to consolidate driveways. Landscaped `i ! I 1 (Ash to Hall) medians narrow the field of vision for motorists and __ !— � I/ Crossing(Typ.) (Ash to Main) . I � ! increase their awarness of pedestrians and bikes J I / i I ¢ I % within the street right-of-way. • / I i i ! i The Boulevard Plan provides less on-steet parking / I I ! but includes bike lanes. 1 / I I i I Functional Requirements . This alternative is consistent with the Transportation • System Plan with the exception of not providing 1 ' on-street bike lanes from Ash to Main. The physical ! I 1 ! �kgLL design parameters are: i I l I I Fire Station Tigard Water District Gateway' 8t tz 1 ROW: 68' - 74' Q ! I ,.,t► j Through Travel Lanes: 2 { Iii I - 7/ Median: Landscaped with left-turn pockets rd I 4 On-street Parking: Main to Ash: Parallel parking I I ! (Hall to Ash) �„'l`` / Ash to Hall provides no parking Illtelgtilli - - _ -_� Bike Lanes: Main to Ash provides none. /-- +►14.14. • ►14/.14 46.7ilr •► 4,[�[rr.14* 404 �[�� w �irii►�+l►�if.� l d� �- •�' Ash to Hall provide on-street bike lanes piety m —�-- -©=a=e=e-�,1111- =e' B___ _ _ MST. �e=e=e=e`` — ,f1105,�� \ / \ Sidewalk Width: 12' i • — ! �, Pedestrian Crossing Improvements: Curb extensions, \>//0 I I marked crosswalks, refuge in raised medians ! , i i0 I I I \ Implementation � j I �'\ \ \ Based on SWG input and City Council direction, • ! P I I i / `N implementation of this alternative is not expected. . D i Bicycle PO to Fanno j I I \.\ • Creek and Main Street I i \ • Estimated Construction Budget: $x,m,m . , r I 1 ; `‹ • Downtown Streetscape Plan City of OTAK,July,200(* TIGARD Street Design Concept BURN HAM STREET SECTIONS GREEN STREET PLAN Green Street Plan The Green Street concept will require amendments to MAIN TO ASH ASH TO HALL(with median) the City Transportation Plan but it was the preferred concept of the Streetscape Working Group. Design parameters are: a • a • Functional Classification: Collector ROW: 74' - Through Travel Lanes: 2 ;I. a 0' la. x,_ Median:Main to Ash: None a . Ash to Hall: Landscaped with left-turn ,. ;P• ,. �� ► :;r pockets 1 4,4 On-street Parking: Parallel parking on both sides — - f i�l �1 .1. , Bike Lanes: None �Wy /MI ewe �w_' �„ ��y Lr!y :, '��' '��' Sidewalk Width:I —' '—' — —� Main to Ash: 18'with tree wells/landscaped 12-18' 8' 11' 11' 8' 12-18' 12' 8' 11' 12' 11 8' 12 stormwater planters Sidewalk Parking Travel Travel Parking Sidewalk Sidewalk Parallel Travel Median/ Travel Parallel Sidewalk Ash to Hall: 12' with tree wells/landscaped Lane Lane Parking Lane Turn Lane Lane Parking stormwater planters Pedestrian Crossing Improvements: Curb extensions, Q D Q 50'(min.) . marked crosswalks, refuge in raised medians 38'(min.) Q ) Boulevard Plan 74' R.O.W. 74' R.O.W. The Boulevard Plan concept was largely consistent with the City Transportation Plan. It was not the BOULEVARD PLAN preferred concept of the Streetscape Working Group. Design parameters are: MAIN TO ASH ASH TO HALL(with median) , '' a Functional Classification: Collector a^�`�. a .1' ROW: 68' - 74' 7 • a ' T k v r a \ Through Travel Lanes: 2 ;„ " Median: Landscaped with left-turn pockets -r \ `' µ Q 4: On-street Parking: /Q Q x Main to Ash: parallel parking both sides r Ash to Hall:None. Bike Lanes: �n I fl f...rs i ! iI al Main to Ash: None ` � �'1 pima; = . �. Ash to Hall: Provide bike lanes • Sidewalk Width: 12'with tree wells '''''' 11 12 11 5 12 12' 8' 11' 12' 11' 8' 12' 12' 5 Pedestrian Crossing Improvements: Curb extensions, Sidewalk Parallel Travel Median/Turn Travel Parallel Sidewalk Sidewalk Bike Travel Median/Turn Travel Bike Sidewalk marked crosswalks, refuge in raised medians Parking Lane Lane Lane Parking Lane Lane Lane Lane Lane Note: If the Ash Avenue to Walnut Street connection• Q 50' Q is not completed(per the TSP) increasing traffic volumes on Burnham could become a negative factor 74' R.O.W. (min.) 68' R.O.W. min. for downtown. Downtown Streetscape Pla DRAFT: 7-17-06 City of Otak. July, 2006 T I GAR M. Street Design Concept BURNHAM : GREEN STREET PLAN Near the Source Sustainable stormwater management practices in the right-of-way and the idea of Green Streets has become increasingly popular in the past 5-10 years. Planter Trees Green Street stormwater management facilities (Optional) Planter with Seat Wall control runoff and associated pollutants near the - (340'-350'SF) source. Management of runoff near the source allows Sidewalk Planter b for smaller facilities that manage smaller runoff 175'- 185'SF) :.. ;: _>:_' -:-.. ;:;:' : volumes and smaller pollutant loads. Collectively,• = they can provide great benefit to the management of -- �- A,} ii 111-110---- flow and pollutants in an urban area ® �-'1!r '"fir` - .. . �: a- D Multi-functional Streetscape 0 t , ENEO, Stormwater management facilities can occur in © . 1 �,�Z,(typ) I medians,parking lanes, travel lanes, sidewalks, tree wells or underground. Green Streets can and should FLOW THROUGH CURB EXTENSION PLANTER FLOW THROUGH CURB EXTENSION PLANTER become a familiar part of the urban landscape. They provide opportunities to appreciate and interact with the hydrological cycle.As with streets themselves, these facilities need not be regarded as unattractive, but as functional infrastructure. Increased Habitat and Human Interaction with Nature Habitat for animals and insects is limited in urban environments. From tree canopy to stormwater Planter wiTrees Optional facilities, Green Streets can provide vegetation that (115'-120'SF) Pervious Paving Parking Egress Paving beneficially contributes to that habitat, increasing (Optional) (Impervious) Stormwater Tree Well opportunities for human interaction with nature and Flow Through Sidewalk Planter our surrounding landscape. Tree Well (12'=15'SF) (45'-50'SF) (12'-15'SF) p ® == =- - -_®__ ® ----====-=-====_==== 111111741111111114%1112-111 D nii...11.. IN I . 1Z30 : if obo ti„,,... . I 51r-60'(GYP) I 30.35'(typ) I 16-1$(typ) PLANTER AND TREE WELL FLOW THROUGH FLOW THROUGH • COMBINATION TREE WELLS SIDEWALK PLANTERS Downtown Streetscape Pla DRAFT: 7-17-06 City of Otak. July, 2006 I AR w• treet Design oncept WEST COMMERCIAL STREET I-1 :: ,>;� :, E:'.-,,,,,,`"."- , ��`_ Project Description __------------1 {- _ =r;. ;� \ - . A half-street improvement(Lincoln Street to Main) ( I jointly developed with a gateway at Main Street. For I _________________I ! L1 _ I the downtown streetscape environment the 1.--- - -i i M1"' - s g streetscape east of HWY 99W is the most important. E~ Commercial Park and 'V,_ ;r.x,.,,;''` I Pathway Connection .'` / �� Key features: II °%�' Continuous sidewalks and street trees Y;wfi .ti,�t''� % �s r z `' . ;; • Curbless street edge (west side only) 4 r Implementation :Y'f, Vi. , Construction is scheduled for 2008. Right-of--way ®, `- ••∎111 1 ia•1 /L j; acquisitions will be required at the Main Street ��a . --_. `-----_ intersection. Property acquistion of the existing small COMMUTER RAIL ' 114. ll` "` 1-1-___ L. / parking area south of the street will be required to 8, -_=j_-_ �--.. develop the gateway. The City should continue a ' a - _ _ , on-going discussions with the Commuter Rail____ / I .••: Project for that acquisition. Co muter Rai1 .'• ` v '�► -4411 *•n-� on i� '� Project Coordination • - - - it �i1:- R�''+°' :� On-going planning and feasibility studies for i- 48 • 47` = � ..1 -'° :•11'w,- "...•t! transportation improvements may impact West �•� ♦ + '!!et..t Commercial Street:• l 1 --�' �-''•'. • Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan / / / J • Commercial Street realignment j1 ��,_ ----j--_------ -- . --------7,-,--1 ! - _ Realignment of Commercial Street may isolate the ` �"'• gateway from the street and leave it as an impediment to future revedevolpment of vacated , PHASING OPTION A PHASING OPTION B right-of-way. ix Potential Phasing ,, Curbless Street Edge ,, ., Curbless Street Edge , , _ p - Potential phasing could be considered if funding were not available for both street and gateway �� °+� ... �__ ''1'" improvements or property acquistion cannot be L •= — — completed for 2008 construction: Option A-Half-street improvements only with private 12' 12' 17 Existing Private 12' 10' 10' 8' varies parking as an interim use. Existing Private Existing Private Sidewalk Travel Travel Parking Parking Parking Sidewalk Travel Travel Parallel Gateway Option B-Street improvements with on-street parking integral Lane Lane (no impacts) Lane Lane Parking Development (impacts) _ (impacts) 9 P 2 to the gateway plaza design. 24' 28' Q 50' R.O.W. D Q 50' R.O.W. D Estimated Construction Budget(Street Only): $x,xxx,xxx • Downtown Streetscape Plan City of OTAK,July,2006 TIGARD Street Design Concept SIDEWALK FUNCTIONAL DESIGN 18 FOOT SIDEWALK , 'v-= \, ��\��.� Street Light(typ) Functional Zones Trees Well Options \ \ Pavement ��\\ Sidewalks function with different zones, each zone fix;\o._.�ow _- -.1.41_01S_ ' �tiO� r I supporting different pedestrian activities. Cum Zone r -, 111111111 . m ,��:, •- Fumishing Zone It �r ? Curb Zone r.,'\ , i lir •.,.. t t ` This zone physically separates pedestrian uses from ' '' �i roadway uses. No furnishings in this zone. Pedestrian Zone co ∎'7 Furnishing Zone , This zone has two basic purposes. First it is an area Building Zone •A:. where pedestrians access on-street parking or transit. >/ ////�/ /// /��/ Second, it provides space for permanent signs,poles, ///% // / street trees, and the selected street furnishing.A %, \ �� visually distinctive pavement treatment is suggested. * Pavement options include: 15 FOOT SIDEWALK �� . Concrete with distinctive scoring•�\ , \� \ Curb Zone A.\ �� r`N9 ,�i • Concrete pavers with color and texture•Famishing Zone y, . - �� \` ; if,.re_ ", 1 ; g... ) { Tree well options include: : : �' ' .t..-'-,- 1 • Landscaped tree wells 5'x 9' Pedestrian Zone ;"; w L, ' • Tree grates in the Classical style mss:: tl - '1 - -' Pedestrian Zone Building Zone N / � ll Intended for through and unobstucted travel by J�� /J///� pedestrians. It should remain free of furniture, outdoor /i/// seating/displays or other obstructions. It should be the smoothest and least detailed pavement surface within �� ,��_� �o�� the sidewalk. The pedestrian zone should not be less 12 FOOT SIDEWALK �� than 6 feet of clear space. Curb Zone N\ ��; •� Building Zone • Furnishing Zone 4 , \ y The area between the pedestrian clear zone and • building facades. This an important zone for retail or Pedestrian Zone ? ,,;„.•"Ty!. mixed use streets. Appropriate uses include outdoor ...: , seating, temporary storefront displays or small ! ..- ">' I ' ' I projections from buildings such as planters or steps. / //// / f////// " Pavement may be identical to the pedestrian zone or have a more distinctive appearance through detailed scoring patterns or concrete pavers. Downtown Streetscape Plan City of UTAK July.2006 TIGARD 4.: Rh,q . f t.4 ateways.an u ® c pa�ces� x T " • D TI As they are developed in the future,public spaces and lots create opportunities for both interim and long-term With that in mind, two distinctive forms of gateway design. The Unifying Elements palette is intended to be gateways will be integral to the revitalization of uses. The interim use could be an educational design were explored- traditional and naturalistic. The flexible. Changing materials can essentially soften the downtown. Implementation will create dramatic demonstration garden for sustainable landscaping traditional form is based on simple combinations of low forms, making them less heavy (physically and changes on the ground. The concept design for each practices. The educational focus could be on native walls and columns. These elements are long-standing visually), more transparent or more irregular in size and attempts to meet four critical objectives: landscaping as fundamental to urban horticulture, and urban village icons, signifying arrival and entry, and edges. For instance, a low brick wall can be rougher and • Reinforce thematic identity for downtown on a variety of sustainable practices for small businesses solidly in the tradition of"bricks and mortar."This more irregular by using stacked stone or river rock. That • Create spaces and landmarks that attract people to and the home. The space could also provide for passive traditional form is also highly adaptable to site specific same wall can become even more irregular(naturalistic) downtown recreational uses and support space for downtown configurations and selection of materials from the as a horizontally placed column of basalt with matching • • Utilize high quality materials from the palette festivals and events. Long-term use of the site has been Unifying Elements. It allows for massing and scale vertical pieces of columnar basalt. Garden style Unifying Elements (Section One) identified as a performing arts center in the preferred needed to attract passing motorists on highly traveled landscaping, such as flowering non-native shrubs and • Identify a next set of catalyst projects to create a development alternative of the TDIP. streets. mowed grasses, might become native grasses of varying green heart for downtown height and stem colors supplemented by masses of low Fanno Creek Gateway-Fanno Creek is a unique and Walls and columns can be constructed from materials native shrubs and spreading groundcovers.Annual Public Spaces hidden asset of downtown. Visitors often arrive and such as detailed cast-in-place concrete, brick, fitted flowers might become perennial columbines, hostas and Public spaces are small urban rooms. Their design leave without knowing the creek is there.Acquisition of stone, or stacked river rock. Ground plane planting daylilies,providing a very different and more natural should invite pedestrian and bicyclists to enter and property on the west side of the creek will allow would be a variety of maintained grasses or low character. • •linger while feeling safe and comfortable. Even though development of a loop pathway, connections to the groundcovers accented by massing perennial and annual these public spaces are small in scale, they can express regional Fanno Creek Trail, overlooks, a small open flowers. Small to medium flowering trees would , _ "great ideas" from the Tigard Downtown Improvements space for passive uses, and enhancements to the bridge provide the green canopy. Summer irrigation would be , - i rr `->-= E �` Z '•'-, ki Plan(TDIP)-green connections, a walkable village, itself The result will be new visual and physical access required. ;� • r:: r:-t�2` ' ` : .� ' P Y q .:-„rte n .�` e i and a sense of finding the heart of downtown. With the to a downtown natural resource that is uniquely Tigard. 1�. - � >T�® ;'-.1' ,_� t support of the Streetscape Working Group(SWG), ' Restoration and maintenance of the creek banks will A more naturalistic form was also explored. This form _ • concept design for public spaces should: complete the picture. Ongoing City efforts to develop a would create different massing and geometry of small . Minimize hard surfaces in favor of soft surfaces and larger scale master plan for the Fanno Creek Public spaces. The icon of the column would be eliminated and landscaping Area will be complemented by this smaller scale design the low walls would be become multiple horizontal •,= -- X ...., :` _ ' '- •. -- - `..--• •• Express the City's commitment to Fanno Creek as concept. elements. The horizontal elements can be constructed an important natural resource through access, from materials such as fitted stone, stacked river rock, Public Art preservation, and restoration Gateways or columnar basalt. Public art should be considered for each public space • Express the City's commitment to sustainable Gateways are not urban rooms. Gateways are portals in and gateway.Art can increase our awareness of the development practices the streetscape, creating highly visible drive-through Ground plane planting would be a variety of native qualities and history of a public space, a portion of the ' • Provide new gathering spaces for people entries and landmarks for downtown. Design and scale grasses and low native groundcovers accented by small streetscape or a significant landmark. It can increase our emotional attachment to places and make them more must attract motorist's attention without becoming canopy trees in a composition with dominant horizontal memorable for both residents and visitors to downtown. The Downtown Streetscape Plan identified two public unfriendly to pedestrians. Gateway design will also pieces. No summer irrigation would be required once spaces as catalyst projects in developing a Green Heart express key downtown themes by drawing from the plants were established. The Public Art Plan developed as part of this project can • for downtown. palette of Unifying Elements in final design. serve as a general road map for implementing A majority of the SWG expressed a preference for the The gateway at the intersection of West Commercial more traditional forms with the exception of the downtown art and locations for art. However, • �-, - i:c•'' . :. '. t' ••" and Main Streets is an exception. It is less a gateway gateway at West Commercial and Main Streets, where a considerable flexibility and creativity should be ,F a? � �'"'`f v '. • afforded any individual artist commissioned. �,�' •T1 - .X and more a Main Street node, visually and physically more naturalistic treatment was preferred.• • 9 s. - r;�::. _ i- 1 linked to the commuter rail station. Significant �K� ,; �;- �' �� ., � •� t* ,• I. s,,; �.. ;. ,".t j r�! , �y h 9 r, a: 1•_:. °i �-�°>— pedestrian activity can be expected. Hybrid Gateway Forms f�-,tpp-, -• . ?°- „� .+40.0`;',.,'4 ,• SWG members asked if materials more natural and less r. ,Z.on., -- - - - - Gateway Forms traditional than"bricks and mortar"masonry or garden ft-,-: 4, •- - The primary streetscape gateways into downtown are at style landscaping might be used while still maintaining Main Street and Highway 99W and at Hall Boulevard the fundamentals of traditional form(e.g. walls and Demonstration Garden (adjacent to Burnham Street and and Burnham Street.A preference of the SWG was for columns and sufficient massing to be conspicuous at p t , south of Main Street)-Acquisition of two vacant tax street gateways to have a visually similar appearance. vehicle speeds). This objective can be met through final F 0 DRAFT: 6/30/06 Downtown treetscape P a city of Otak, July, 2006 T 1 GA R ...,... ateways an . • us is paces .I.Ft::.,,.....,...,.:Ti..__..,._._fr:%,..a:,...i:_i_::I..t7....,........:: ,... ::.....;j:,:.,,.:,r.m,. v.,E...r",,_.- ii,,_,_.-:,:,. .'..y.i.--.l°P-:.::...,:.....:,,,.ete...s4;_--.,,,,:..:'-' '":;,;'..:..:::...w..7=----=4-7,,. .-:_:--:,,I,.t.,,,...}lb:...s__si_ri:....:i_w..:_.,,ari..r..:):.,,,.._jr:..t-_,_"Nt::::.1:--.i.._i;lr.: ,z'l:::!,)/L\--:s7:\\..:',-::„/,.---:,,,1:,.,:-r-,,'r:_..,'.'"4,,.4.s.7:.1,4,,5./.:I;.:....14.-t,..,.„......,.:1',-:.:..„...-Elii..:"--:::77- ..,,5-,--...,..4.: .71„,, INTRC3DUCTIONI Water Features t- ,.., : ..... ., , - .s., ,A..% , , ,--* ..- ... 7: t,. ,,.,3 Water features can be integrated with the design of selected public space and gateways.As public art they l'•• .%T A: fri ' 1.--t , . . ,../c (•,.. c.,,,. - ,fr„. 3. . - , - L.,.. , 41, ..t.,::2,,- ..;.-7-_4.! t....., ..-',,,,I.,:,• - ...--- ., -,\--,-.,,,,-...,,,,.. i....,,i, .... , may become artful designs in their own right. Water -1' - .?' ..,a-- 7' `. 1-I 4 .';.:1•• features options include conventional fountains that ..-. - , r- - -- ...-.• fr•• _ r " ' ?.. illt---‘,,, Vol. 1r '' r 4.-4.- ' "---, .: 7" till' ...- circulate and display potable water, as well as designs ,... . „,..,;,•..• . _k that will display rain water and kinetic energy only ..7-,# - - . . - , -.. - -;\,...„- . ,,......,..-. 7 . .- % . -s , 44, :a ,l,„-,-.- --1„ during storm events. The latter water feature may also "•• .z.. •// _44)4, „d ,. . . , • . -.ft., .4_ ... • , . . • „.... ,..,.. ,.._ ....„, Ii, .....„ -, • , play a fiinctional role in the management and treatment . -- .--Arr.,;,,,ti , .4i7 '• -_,,,./4'f„lft w.' - --- - ' . . . ' ,.:, :..1i4-. t : of stormwater,particularly within the planned Fanno . ..... - .. - ., .....--..... « - --...-) i f..,.. .. ,s, V , -...,,,;,,,, . • ,ve., ,- ;, ' ..,14„. ' . -..,.. -,.. • .....-.... - Creek Public Area. i_.•-.1k... ..- - .. ,r- ;" I.. vv. ''::..."'"-';'-',.1 ' , 1/4 ".." -• . 'ilit... 9.-- l' #.. ' '. j'''-' -..•'4 - . 7 '-k- ■'• • ,. . . -4'1' .:,, -'''s:•e• ',;,4•• ,/ ' ,'*if•• ';'W-'•• f 6 ' '''t .• . ' * " '•S T, •, ' ' t i .11 - I:; ._■,,,, s`-'•-;, ••'-, %;..'' .•*"' .P.4&:•. ' t-;;•:'4 i •1•..■..-,./Ni' N'-V.'''•11:-,‘ ';" • - ,,..... ...J11. • .• '') - ...'''.. - . v •', . .4r- / - 't - ''..-4 ,' p.,..„1"../. ;• * .. .. ,..._ . . I , * ■As- i \,.-‘-• .t):. '%. ' ‘4 ' -. ../..C-,1 • ••- , *;., •y I . -•• However,water features require regular maintenance. GATEWAY y's ',./ -.-=..,„„.`--....,,,,,,,. -#4.4„;--. f.-. L.,.. p.,(:*,.. - •`• ,- .- . _-,.., ,-,-;-...40- ,-r -.„- . .„, ,--!,___,•,..,t.,, , Their implementation should occur only when it is clear ,/, !r • • --- ---..,:,:,--,,'..- ,••-=-...?( • • .2- • c'. l`t'pi ' ' that long-terrn maintenance funding will be available. le 'I • . • Y.." -,--7.>, -._,,, -,%. • \.' --7,:.,, • N.. . 4C 4.1.4 1,1 ..: e • :I i 7: , Li ..,..„. 4 ''ilsr „,••‘‘.-...,, --- ,''- '• ' • - , -.., -, . 7 • #''s ;A, ' _,..., • ,..--..••.:,'%dig*: ••:,.-\ ,\..,;. -- ,, / ..,...,/..1-, ". 4 ,. -■ , ;I: - „. = f" ■•-• -1,1;"". , .r\z-r-,,/,' • '•' ' ;.'--N. -..;:-..' ; ' ' ••• - , 1 On-going maintenance costs are often a greater - . ,.--- ..-, . ,., ,,.-- ,..-•, . • N, , .i ...:, , , d- , deterrent than construction costs. ;• ,....• . ... / ' -:X.---: - '-17.- :, -4 • le -ee• •_■1-', ' ,4**P ' :.= , N • -. - • 4; .- - - • A, , - - ., . .- - ‘ .... .....‘,.., ', „- .,,',/-. ,, ..;-.-... ,:le ,- ..- ... - .. • , ' .. . PARKS & . . ....-- :.---/-:-.,'.........11; A .. i i ' " 4C*;1' . '' ' OPEN - :. .... -.t. ..;z , .i.."/ / „..- ,. ..,.<;:,-;,,,z,'----''' .411 . ....-. :::-:':-;--): \ ,..„..'--1:'...."-'' ,,,,.......\‘_}k.\-..' '''':: : ,J _,...,. , , -•• 4 %AIM aft' MII,itetai• VI . 4,, . .. '. At.. • 7? , .-.- , , - • . ..?•,..... --. 'It-" 4, , I-.:, ,1 - _ 4, , i t's .,--. . i ,,- 4 • wit_-.1( - - •LI ,iis;. -.* . .7 - • . - 1113 j-,-/17\'',4, ,.% it • ., - r%• ..' \ *A.-- -'. ,0 4 II ''Ai* , W.,,,, .,, vitt So/I.& ' '.,t-i". ... ' \ ,z4pj - '", ' " .* :;-1-1 .. ; ' . ' 171..r . - .‘7 s ri t'':-*. ■4?. 4',. • , f- " ' ` *i',...1-, ' A . .. :- ,..• -.4 -- . .> q - fr. -A, - - • '....._ . . .. •\ ........ COMMUTER RAIL - , -•,;. -4 -..,7%,‘.-s.. -,N,-,.,;-••• ----,...• ...,c "N.-'"?... .0, .. , -.-.*,. ,r .).- __, ._:, -, - ,';-!•?Z' • ; . . #-*-.,,, STATION AND . /,- _ -,;‘,:. '-.." .63/4-.,,,.=$t-"-W ‘-'• • 'Ts- \• --‘..,--•-..-9 ',.-'-N - .,- - L .':...c_ ( ---\„, i ' "-,,„;/. . -4-,-..1...- ..,-.4k ;„.. ....„.w....11, -,„..,-,% \ c: - _ ::::!.., ..4......, .4 1 :".- t 1 • • l -• . e .., !/7 ■-..'*** or A )..N...".' .. 7,"..;■ • '' \ ' •' •16,, • / . ":• ' ‘:.Si.. . r fo....?-tte'l ** e" ‘f... ' .. .... *1 • ■ • ,..,• ..„,.,„ _ IL e "...- , - - -- ,,,,- i..., ......,..; • ,„.. , /.7, ,..-.A -. ,, , -, *Jo s •, .‘,.„. -,:;, s;,.. o; -„, -• „ ,,„ . 1 s 4.,„,, ! / ' .., i „ ..):„,.;,,.. .„ ,,, 4., ,. 4:.‘ - •2, • , '...* I ‘^ " . • ,•• ' - I' -h• 11 . .....* ' ''. .3 .. li..,. e" 4..z : -1's' •••• :4 . ,Z .• '. lial‘ I --,..„, v(•°,-4,,t. -4 ,'.,,; ), APC,.... ,,4;:;:v 'iv ' ! '1,i,'' '. •.p.,...,(--:- - '.Q, . '' ' ''''‘,", -.,, e.• , - •:. ' --- 0 ',,'-.,,,,v-,-T,7," 01 ,,:'-4-=/,, ',' 10W":,."-1'' 4egty ,,,- ,„,,,--Fm.,,,, -<.,0 „-../-! ,t,, , - , .,, ,..„,i,■,,,,,., 1 . ... 1 ...- , . .- , , e -.1tivir ,• i •.,.);47 s' .... 4.i ',.f /- :f, -. ,_ •-• . ,41' .. iv .' '---jv- ---tzz"-Ablk A.VO , 4e. ss v ,/:;.. -v:- .)). 10 .--- "." .".41:" -4.1/ '7/1' - ''.. - --..:', ....15- . ' ss-;7•_.\,....;:,)14)...*:.{:. . 1, . ' .IIc •. . .ertS!.....J'... '' 46.> !„. . /. , .., • -- '- : 4„ . 4* . ..: --;,, -- ,-1,--,, ,t1.>,-,. 'N,._ / „ ,,-,-f „f-'N. ‘,. - c.,.• . limir,S .:,..,*. ., ...,,.,V,;..,,, - .,4,,..`,....' ..%\,6*(•;,..... \.- --,`,./,4;, . ...4,:.4:1-\ .,,, . V * a!4' 44)/'' '''.9 ./..;.....„4- .., - ,,,F.,,,-..., . „.--_,4,,,- ....:......,4::, ,, ,s• - -...',;.-'-,..,:..g.,.:. ,.- -4,„‘.. --N.- ,;:c;;&,/,-,._,s. \\ :----,-, , , % . ., . N.,J• ,AI . , . ; , , -rf:i)::•.)9",:t..,-,,.. „:„.„ -\,--4,-,.s. -'. „a- -4- -‘,./.,,Ap>\- \ _ • Aors: - -/f- - .,•.• 0) \ s ,. i -4. ';,..1S, ,..,/ "si". ,..;,,,,,,./ . ,,, .... • ,‘,2 \ /..i„ • - •' 'zip- ''...'' . . • . ' •• '.;, .1?", .._ ., -„tt, .„:.......,.,. : le - ', r- .., • 4t"- ...,-,--". - • ,... •..,-.04.,04, ,, , ' . .1:j„ . ,...., ilifr...,:.: . •. lc,. %,, -...1,-, .,.....7.?- , , S, - -^.,,,--4-v `,.s: •,,i; ", ...„,,- ;;.t; '''. .* "t" ._. •--\`••-•- -• • F=.• ) '., Ti s" ....::;4,..';.r• ''''' I -,=4.-4-'..-1.. 0'-%•."fr I I o r A. 1.1>Makh. ... ,_:,,..T.,4.*4• if:* , '.4 `:'' " .4 t#' ,. ....\\ K . ,, - ,, ,,,,, . ';.e, -. 4..-;. .,r. . --- .. -. - , . . -.54N - ft -‘.4- ...,,„ty ,-1,--, , -:-,_ ,.,. s,. :A \ •., ' \ .• ,) .• , 5, 4,-.7 , ; ; / 7 .... e4- ,• - - ' :- - / -• .'.. '..... - - % , .--. -11.!IF-t 4 ',,,'' ".4, .4... • ' . /...// -*It! • ' . 1. %, • .. .-..,-......."'' Vt 54i . .s...,'..;;',:.4'...' .'' 2■- le. ' - C . ----. .'- .-'...---...:: ''''.-- . ..-: t . *'''•-,4" * I...Ni\., t. . ii0k* Ab. 4if, -' • ' ''' 'is..`\\ \ \ 11. ' ...■r .* 2 -':,--L•IC..C;*!:;: 7:. -'. .'r•-■''. %.,,I ,r. i"Iiiv.."41* .' -''' ' 1.k.'"' rk• -V *.1.‘.... -• .,'_..c..;,....._ . :,.,.:"....-'4,,,..::-...i;.1', ;..,',..,..- ..' .41111..=.4.4P.:444.'rr:..-' '`''' - _•.›.7. ' . 'jOr'.:.\ ;*.!.." '',,, \ .*. ' f el ./1101 .•. -4ttt * .' - i.- 1 la.. :.,'W ...V,' ' ' s ,- ,,'',> • '', N. dr N. ''' .. • - -N. .%N..'• . ,. . : '.5 1:':- '"". • ' ,e• ^ ■•.I:4 4...-e;''''C.'',.,:,* .i." - s ;- '',••,s' •,„/ s,,,!..4 '"k. ;V -.- ,. ‘ ‘... . . ,.„. ,,,„„ - __ .....-.,_ \-, -..•,.-..-__,, . . 2/... ( c _ . •.: „ ...., - ., .. . ... ,cr . -.' : ,.4 4. . -• `r,..: . -.. s,.. .. • -.0. - .,. ., ,.- g,. ., .. - .0,-..z. - -._._•. ,•.. :.. 7 .i. , , ,...-<,_ , .. _-, , *>-•-- • ,. _.e .,,---:-- --,......,z i. . ..„: , . ,- .■, • . , ' * .44,-- , --14, ----- ° - . : - =-.., - -",- e ‘ , . - .■.,- -„, 11* ig ''' - . ," .: c,.,;,,N W ‘/-'• ‘•.-.r" \A.' I... , - ., 4?..,' , ' :.', . . . i.,1,.:: ,. •,s n .'• ,e .• ' ,. .--7-M-r IT-.,•,:,..s . i ',,.., . .' ' -..•....,,,',r .,, ./ • - ‘;.' , ‘ '. "•- . ''';.‘ "e's'‘.4n.:. '' ,,,•' •;/.2';.\ :^..f.---':;.°1:-) • ..'t •ir,-.. 4-' , -- It'„•.' t!in"' ,'; . . • ..` / , 111 - . / ''•: '.',44,, ,*--- -' •-..1,:k '. • '. .› ': ‘ .• - s'ir-. I / : 1-4 -'s i ' _i!N.,,,a % , -`...''.• , - -' - ). .-• v - . ''''-." '• 4 ,:.?.-, , ": 4•f ' s • •,?--• •.1 '• -.7 ,ig,"\\., -v.- ar -!s- . . .-..,..,,-1......-' L...-. ,:..-,.i,"•.'',-//,,4 lI 1 4.,• rg',,kr. ::...' 4;',.; °'_. .-- . ,..•. '..va•viroll .4 \•\s-i,. DRAFT 6/30/06 Downtown treetscape Pla city of Otak. July, 2006 I I F ow • ateways an�• • u : is paces LIE ► ,5, , ON GAR E NI Compost f •- �s r F*,��,. •• Bins ' T ��,a ,, ;, -a; 4f-.' �/ / (.! f',%; •' owl IV�� *� �� O Project Description Native i p Garden �� 411)A` �,¢ A temporary demonstration garden for urban � l sustainable practices applied to home gardens and I�\�: �' °�' Native'.. .� �" 3- 'f' small businesses can be developed on two vacant tax '�� ;- ''Garden• 4 .=f.- lots. The focus could be sustainable horticultural � ... ,' '" '' R` practices for the home garden, water conservation Play Area ,S, '-sA-' - 'er_: � , , �,'• z.` �"� ? • ' p 1 4k °r ':' ' © ' Mead w . I = t �' ::�.. and generation of solar power to supplement PV f ountain ��" •; _ �`'� • conventional electrical power sources. The garden an al a supporting a f d c so serve as su o space or downtown 1,1 11". s rave e - } P P g P i ti 1 �' events and festivals. ,yo t .� tT 1� ,! r l`` 1 . 7 Y i 1 ' ..N.‘, r lislor f.........:.„.....„............:•,....„....,...„..:,„.. , - '=,.' _ This i interim%.,..:.-„::::„•,..„•,..„,„:„.„.-.,...,..„.„.„.,:. •• r /� v s an i t rim use. The TDIP has identified this 1 r• 1 rr. K fe: Native Ir 0 site for development f a performing t - o e orm n arts center. p P � - g Garden TT Other redevelopment '��<� O o opportunities may occur as s . pP Y + �; �� - • : .�1,. educational aspects of the demonstration garden into �_�� s , €:-- a _ -- ' f ' N•.,.-•-•-';'-' -',-*-'<-- ;•- the Fanno Creek Public Area is encouraged.•O Existing 4w p x• t • i' -' I4 !4 , . - '‘INk IV, A.V . . /...tv /� . , - „� .� .,},�•,.�.: ! Key Features '&/ � . . _r= \\. .. ° ^. . % • Small pavilion to be used for educational uses • �� (e.g. organized"how to"classes and information) Nk , *` • ti - -F{' Native landscaping and wildflowers with signage .,�� _ indicating characteristics and potential uses in the �r .�' tw f home garden•�' � � :; i` `_ = ;' • Demonstration composting bins ` H-_ =;,;.:;- .-.• `• .,ter -. - Vie• � � : "1.;,± r:a�nti� . 0 f; :`•' ,' '. .r ' fy r ; , , ,1 O' -�yj�^� ' .,,, .. _ • Demonstration of rain harvesting and infiltration y t..- s a,y�l•tl.'� ,.t,...•�•+. 1: 1�r `�e�r '�• 7, -..�"a ��• :-, techniques i ,�I; .'"�;" • {�f �i� �� t, �P.��f ter. t 1 ! Td?' - -, �`, 1 t1.=, ' . Play area for children 2 to 6 years old t /' *lb 0 'r'; ;• ' `• 0, `4, fi % ` ti f 4 ■ . '•t • Optional water feature in lieu of the play area �'; ..,.s , ,= ;Ls� ,? •.•a. x ,, - Estimated Construction Budget: litl* � I .fi'ti. �( r� ,{t/{�E, . :r _� , r:or $140,000-$155,000 • Z't-- f 0 ' . '`'' DRAFT 6/30/06 Downtown treetscape P a City of Otak, July, 2006 –1— 1 GAR N ateways an . mu . lc paces • 99,JVI M E � !$t.U_ PA R '�� - - /.,--. Vii',:,.. :� ,:, ." ; "t.N,,, t .A,-;;;,;„..:-Sr7,. .-,1;.,,:-• ;.-1. ;, -:',/,.... 0:#1:::: *:':::-:1 i 4 v'f..0'. ; . -, - :...*,.' ix:: ,..„ 1;;;,,,:,.-,..:7.:17::::-:94ft: ":.";No,* 4 ' 44/.......- -----, --- . , . . 4 DOWNTOWN TIGARD ;=/. Project Description �''.�.�' ,w, •?,'%''� Physical and visual remoteness from downtown are •;+, , ' y,, limiting factors for the potential uses and importance AV"" �N-- �"i k;7it\" f of this small park area. However, it may be possible•• _ ', �; ° \ j `.� ` to develop a small neighborhood park and children's _ _ �`� t. :-- . l; l/ - ,� -—- play area under the existing tree canopy.An `•� ^s a Q 4 :IL provide access to downtown via West Commercial 3 �i'' , ,Q Street.•4. ';: YS. °_?�. ?f• ' j Park development may be an interim use Future ' yi"` :1?.Fy 1' �i •:';',;,_'vykTX ,h 4 • access and circulation strategies to mitigate the t ',,'?; .c -- :rte { C 41 f;s a.- \� E © negative impacts of Highway 99W congestion may „ :2,s,•:,--,-..7.7..o ;r . 'r41 dramatically change the long-term use and character �t 4, -,, ,f d U _ sv of this site. Those strategies are currently being studied. . � '. z� ' R , . v Key Features W' - _; �. Y �,. w. � 4a : r_ r • . NAo *di • Play area for children 2 to 6 years old 1 � Lighted pathway connection to West Commercial VV � ,t_'__. N, —� r j - • - - I Street l a,s �� „ 1.� _ �1 •- • Preservation of existing tree canopy • Enhancement of the tree understory with native '� —� =; a plants_, _ -: - 4 Estimated Construction Budget: s � �� - $100,000- $115,000 II L ' - r I :l • DRAFT: 6/30/06 Downtown treetscape • a City of Otak, July. 2006 mIGA IF= ND ateways an • " u . lc paces \ 4k FAI\INO CREEK NATURALIST! AT EVVAY ----1........., x......„ - — ,..,.:„..-...,„,..,....,... .,„: ,...- . ..., ._, i! . ..2--_- .‘— . 0- ' '5' " , ,'''• ::"'40. .1 \_-•-1 - tb "IP •." -- • , . .,r 0 . e _ , V...--x ..fit -4.:4)7:.:‘.,:.:..7.:.i...: Ts%Mr) A '301 .... _ • ... A. ,.-::.1e,IL,„;.::..-. . - i \"••■ P -\....---. . . 4 i. , ,, , , •-, . , s. # sti. /. . .\ tt,, 4. x...1 ,. „--s • :-_ i - --.. .., ..,:!,•` '/- l-.‘ .4 '''..--- tla ' .- *- ,* --,', v , !• \ ;,t-...,,, s.". :::: ;)I ik -- N...‘ - .. '- .)- :f- ' - sw 41 ..'), '-- , - -4, .2 w, ,, .,. ,,,. Av,..i... •. . - '. .'" t_ "4. s. " .- '' c„,•• A.'S•s \ ' C)P ' \ • . ...1.q...•..•- ..- 110 DOWNTOWN TIGARD •-., -- A.f- ' ••."% 47 •', A,v..,.' ,.....' VA . ' I .// ,,, <(.\<< 'illr .,-''' . 4.,v•I'.'AN...,- ;IA T,, ,C..• .0 :. S. •, '. / '' .6' ' •s_ - 'e!••.1.;‘'' !' Project Description _ Enhance visual character of the existing Fanno Creek - Bridge as a downtown landmark and gateway into ' , downtown. Bridge improvements can be combined - with an improved pedestrian crossing for Main Street and other streetscape improvements to encourage pedestrian walking along Main Street with the bridge r 13 g g g 4 and creek as destination.Viewing opportunities - , . e9511.11.. It- mftmilliiiiiiiiiii,„ :tii...,:....,./.,"_,..::.,,,, . ., i_zi.........37. - -,7- 1 • should be from both sides of the bridge. 6 411' 1,.,..4t-)4. _. _ ... ...• .. .__.. _.... „7 „ „... ,. •,........ .."..I i .„......_;.,,,..6„..„- ii , .... ,„,, .. ., Key Features , f.: Bridge Enhancements: -„' ' :1.. l 1 I ; ' . ' ' -%r••• • Obelisks or columns at bridge ends ....-07'-'-'' I ill:."''.' i .... ' :bill iiii ji ii.." . .1 ,,,--v.-4- -"1"'""•1 _ pl:c 7r----- -T_ __ 1 _.,__. •._ if , . f ,..ir , --__,>..„,_.,,,L if er-7 ,..'■ ., +'1 ------ ■ ir 1-----• ... e,..0.7-4. :',,,,,4..: • Decorative iron bridge railing to replace existing -----__ i \ ' ---- __, ___ i 1, _-,--_ -- , ---, ' \ ---\ - -- ; .--;;f31--7.-.. 7-. ' open railing • i ---------- i ‘ - ..- ' \'--____ --------- -,- __ • Distinctive sidewalk paving such as a flagstone or — \ ' \ \ angular basalt . ...._, I, ---....__ \ \\, N, al aleftsa ;;;//' — t,- --'q.--_,,„T-_-4 ,--_X4"----' -----..._ 1, ---._, --• --- -------, ,\ • Marked pedestrian crosswalk with natural stone .,,,., .... ' -q.Z.:--- ..-In , - .;,--------,.__ ti ---- ------ ----_,_ „„-----_,....\ ,. , t ------.__., ------,--__,,e---__ _ , .\.,. ......., ., , , bollards 1.„F'"?-:.--',,,•41 .,* ----"-- \ (;Aii.W,-; ,A.. ;‘,.'.-- ' •.',#`40'• ---''--'-. ' I '------•--.- I,;:liii .„. --' '` ,. -41."=- ....■ - •• , . • 064'''•.■,,,v,,, .;;<",,,,',..f■' ::51,‘.,,,i.,:-.,,!%..;c46.%\,,,,,-2,---...__,,,,_ 1 ________ _ \\:,,,, ,..0 7:11,141 -'' :'; ‘,.,"'.,\L ,_ Pathway/Overlook Enhancements: r...,,,,04,..,„:".."-4.-,4 .. ,- „---,,e'...-- A, 114.- - t -----------F-' ---- -------- .,----7------ ---............./.- 4, ,.\\ '"1 • Cantilevered overlooks with decorative iron - ,..7.-r_e„, -,4„,...„, .-''....,,,,'4," -,4r 4/1p, ,_----•-..„_,,,,,. • 4 \ i j --------___:-..-..-- ._ ____----- -- - - --- -----, -,:, 0;;,--1,-./04-, . cie# '- j-'-‘,,, ,,e,:iAr, , , -,,,;i,"--•;,-,, --------- ' ' I , - •,o'-----,_ __ , \\,,,N, railings _ -------- -- ----6-.- .,„:"----,„ , 1 _._.4 L_____-_-,J L.----------=--- -')-------:i -, -k • Distinctive pathway paving such as a flagstone or *,-,.;/.• "-- f.afkA■,.." .--. ,er .._.„,-..e„,,,,ei. ...,:,,,-„,,:,,,..4,:-09-.,i,..-------,.._ ,A.,4", -,---- /„...//,4,0•,.,e,,,r,/ --/,„.•,.,,..„1-,-'-' -...:":,,--",4,---- -...- -....;--....02,- --------- --,_ • Interpretive signage ,-/M-,; 1--.- -'-eff07.-,..-.--r• A-AP-1 e., -,--q - - --"L"--.7- -_ ----L1"--.„-:---i :-..,-:,;-; , :,Iii••Iii - ' ----- ,,,,;,,,„'t ,. ,?•, , AL i , ... yay..qq,,44:'---' .."1-• ,:—Pliel , lipii,11141) '; ' i (r, 4°0,7 mmil 1:::.1,-12,”"i:.-; %ctc.i',17-iiii; 'Y.;:"V.:4-,..11:1P 11';'.:-.:::"-'*,‘ .'. ._ ", -s!' - - \ -"-- --- ...,,.._____ / ;./ .0-, If..r.W.-11.1 •`3E- ':...r'._2.1,:;,,,-2.,:::,,,, ,,,...r.„....- „,,..,,,,,.., _,----........e....-7 .: . .±. , ----_.„_____ Note: Rough textured concrete would be an alternative ,,.,.,,..;, /,..,..,41,,,, 77----"!---!!";•-----7'--- -1 /:,, .. , ' !: s-'''1 i'''' ':••''' •'''7-- . 1,, \ ( - ) _,,,_,‘ ,,,,,, ,,, ,-,- rs,i „IV-I-, 1,7- ,..____ ''..."--,,,_ --'-'----4-___ -,_,_ ----- .-----_____,.... paving material for pathway and overlook. Since this is part of a regional trail system,compacted gravels or other soft surface materials are not recommended. T TiTnf T;4,.:4 1:\14'I,LZ:) MI ' .-.„..,„_,,.,__...,,. .. ,,,,.... " 'T-. --,4, )1), ....,& 1 i•i r -'..,- reV.-1„,.-7°..3..''.0,6„r._.,-.',-,_ _,,-..,-• - 1 p , r•P•-.•.1 1-n._i"f.l_ V ' 1 1 1 I - :-...,.., ', II' / 0 t, 1 • •"•-;a:::'-----s--Ir::::-•::,--- --'''' ;-''..7. ■.."-3;r90-1 'I / - el 1 DRAFT: 6/30/06 Downtown treetscape ' la . . City of Otak. July, 2006 A R._ Nod ateways and Pu • is paces . .. F NNO_ CREEK NA URALISTIC GATEWAY,to•• _,,e, -,••,,•, .. .-, t-'''' . 'r ir '' ' . :,F.' '.1'' --,,,' '- '- . - `�.. , ...1.1 1 ter /° .\ • 4,_,..,, .., . pi., , , , : : ,,,,____D L,_,-ii ,,.,• ` my ��'`,, I- ... xa !•`f fi', It s j f, Al T ~ l --u � r I '� _• r �4 t • .r \ • - Project Description (continued) . Enhance the landscape and habitat characteristics of•' :;) :.1.%' '1, . ' ., Fanno Creek as a downtown natural resource to be IN t _ � ?� fK celebrated and cared for Bank restoration will be a '< ../."--,'.-. '2 ;s '`.iz' ;. , "- A , key aspect of resource care, Restoration should ,emu, include eradication and control of invasive plant r :T,,r` r .•,'r ` ,_ "' �`�'`� �° species, and native plantings,which will provide : y'``�"` -.�.a, • , '. ,1, shaded areas for the creek, food for wildlife, and _ . _' ' ' , ° = v � % .7='`2 " cover habitat above the waterline.. . . -•_,f,',,,A6 'T •A A't '?-4;.,• ' . ' .4,• :' '' 444:-_ i \A." , . . -—-, -- r f ' n Additional open space for passive uses and viewing 1- 4' t_ t mil:• can be developed on the west side of the creek and �' }, ''` _ r ` x - will become a subordinate but complementary space ,' ` { • z . . .... - : ate- ways an . ' u . is paces WY • • ,. .,„y,• ` yr{ 4.... '-./TRAD ITI •_ NAL s. A " \ .• S ;•:d;:•.: >'ri: {t• ,-,-„, S• / • il . _____:i.-,- ,, ,,,I,A- '4"-...- ",c.;--s - •,, %,- 8'.. ,�- i,/ yrJi� 764;_ • ' 5‘.4...'. As-' I.s� y ''':.%- ' tYJ .1:.r:1';?.' fir .'y. _ v �t =�-r' . '. ' 4 DOWNTOWN TIGARD \ may `� �, �.� '` .. Project Description I Develop a vehicular scale gateway for Main Street based on the traditional forms of columns and low walls (up to 3 feet high)' Gateway development should include nighttime uplighting for the walls and • columns and lettering or signage coordinated with :. x ,... <:. r :) ` rte other City of Tigard entry signs currently being WG - t planned. ` '' 44 ,;�,'+ "' -'' ` The choice of materials for walls,columns,pathways 4, r 'J and landscaping may vary from the quite traditional -. 4 [ -- J "bricks and mortar" style to use of more natural '`� - ,., .T _--- -•• materials such as stacked stone or river rock along vim: _, .1A .r;— ' with native landscape planting. Within this range of 44,'� '� �-' < r = possible materials the hybrid form of gateway can be %^�� •4 '� , X'q tr , .i .�" • �' }` achieved through final design—blending the "� k ' t ^ ` � �-- � 1 '/ r` traditional and the natural. \, , . sa _ Key Features - Columns and low walls with options for .tai-' -..c �. ` —sue . ''° w r� *e • mnS O t _ . materials ' ® fl - Brick with precast concrete caps ` - Fitted small stone with precast caps - Large stone or river rock without concrete caps - Columnar basalt ® • Applied lettering such as anodized aluminum or brushed steel for walls or columns • Pathways of concrete or concrete pavers ).... Aill -----MI., g • Seating opportunities - -© —�- © .A. • Landscape planting and trees i -4111111V - {- " F' .., • Public art or water features are optional " r �� ., ; - - 7' Estimated Construction Budget: - 1 -„q.k �, 4 _ $200,000 - $220,000 . _�..,- ,. ., •_ . ' : a t � ; l Yy - �_ DRAFT 6/30/06 Downtown treetscape P a ateways and Pu • is paces Y99TW TR T. ITI • AL ATEWAY Y.N\ • \•, s y, saw _�. '�n� ri•� ! 'V „tazzi. _' = q ��1 *fir.• ,�� q a1 tr � /'• ) ' \ • ' 444400iiik sc... .1: 0")) ,..•., 1 '.- C • 4 , -,� f % ' DOWNTOWN TIGARD J I _ `� - 1 Project Description ". . •�. -%� "" - �' �ti - , Develop a vehicular scale gateway for Main Street '' - " ' —.- ' '' based on the traditional forms of columns and low walls (up to 3 feet high). Gateway development should accommodate the existing Liberty Park tree canopy and pathway, as well as additional right-of- , ..�,.4 - :� way that is needed for intersection improvements at �+ ' Main Street and Greenburg Road and Highway 99W. �� A&� 4 jI Gateway features and materials selection should be ,� �. �A�"ILA similar to the west Main Street gateway. �,�r , ,fir ��444 `—'{�F �� - As with other traditional gateways the choice of .), --v--.-- Ili Ilk 4 J �.. - materials for walls, columns,pathways and r� C.,_� ! landsca in ma va makin ossible a h brid form ma a l landscaping Y D', g p Y `+ . •- t »� I of gateway—blending the traditional and the natural. ,--:-.",_-- ---. , Allrell.7334.-..i _ _, or i -,-, `!. „,_---_-,..-4,..e.:,f,---- %IOW ,.Vt nr-'...b..*•..4:44/4 4V- ' ,..,:r. �J `=-• , r Key Features .,,i,... _ • - 014° Z � 'r f. • Columns and walls with options for NW materials . .. : .-:_'"" �' w...:__ - Brick with precast concrete caps • C' -Fitted small stone with precast caps ..R -Large stone or river rock without concrete caps L v f' ' 3 -Colum nar basalt _ K.. • Vii.1� -� a f,< Applied lettering such as anodized aluminum or ' :,- ;� brushed steel rSeating opportunities i, 1 Public art or water features optional . Estimated Construction Budget '''" �� - $160,000 - $180,000 \\ 1. , • :i . � t - e . ref` �kf'%'r - t . � 4 j 4 1 ....t. � DRAFT: 6/30/06 Downtown treetscape Pla city of Otak. July. 2006 TIGAR No \ 111-1..)7\ \ ateways an • - u • is paces BURN HAM/HALL_ TRAD ITI • NAL ` TEWAY. •1: ii l r � fr m . Z 4 rte ,' _S .` „).12.....___,.,--- - - ,. , .,.... ....,...„. .....4,„„„,„_ \ , ...., ea, ./. . ' 1'4 ass a 114-:.-\ '-. _- , yBURNH4M ST. �1.. :% DOWNTOWN TIGARD - a 4 . ;, $ j"" *to It I - Project Description E.--- ", ; - � \ Develop a vehicular scale gateway for Main Street i',-•,--t-,-- ateways and Pub is paces U RN HAM STREET ROUNDABOUT", O ` ' - - .r.4-,-. . .;_ -__- ... ..,_ __ .- ,, , ):,\7 7-:\ ) i r :::"; ,, .4.41.T.,:1 4:4 ..;',.• - i:', ///" ( :''.• a;11 ` )/' 1:°11 �G� DOWNTOWN TIGARD . ,- - Project Description _ A roundabout at Burnham Street and Ash Avenue will . � , be a second"portal"into downtown. It is likely that k 1'. future development along Burnham Street will grit A A� ,' concentrate a higher amount of retail and pedestrian- . oriented uses north of Ash Avenue. In that scenario, '' � the roundabout will be a visual marker for a shift in �' land use types. It will also visually mark the shift to a , 4741+.■ trN,21(II . 4 significantly wider sidewalks along Burnham Street. 3 Realignment of Ash Avenue will be required.As a - _ °® traffic management device, the roundabout will be _- i a .. fully functional when extensions of Ash Avenue ® ® ® � - , occur. =- =.. 'I - ' IIKey Features — . . •• Landscaped central portion of the roundabout Optional aesthetic enhancements include: -y -Low, curving walls of fitted stone to segment s ',- \��- _7_� �--s'"� , / ..f ` ,_ . . the inner circle s K >` y >> --�� -Columnar basalt stone for the inner circle ' . ,,,4' -Flowering trees ® �` ®` - F r k ' '- ' l;,.. •• Curb extension areas on each corner of the • ® - k - �,x. t . • ,.,,,,,_...„.,..4,• intersection may be used for stormwater treatment•µ t Y x _# _ a (bioretention)planters t :,...; L., i.y" ? Rrs 3i Estimated Construction Budget: ' ' '" •�� s O I- Included in Burnham Street Construction Budget s )11P4i. ... % . • DRAFT: 6/30/06 - Downtown treetscape Pla City of Otak. July, 2006 T I GA R END ateways an . - u • is paces Itk U T • 14 I�L RA AT • ..:___/1.4„.,7, ,...i.,,--:. ,,,-. %,4.,...-,r,•,..,...".:1 dill ,.. . c„,,,, , 4,. ii l sb, , .../I, 19----..-•.--.' . - .�, rte,. Alift 1.4 eh ,/,- ,:,., ,... .,,,, .,. . Ic.-- , , , -..4.1 . ' • Dr yip 0 e,.z.-1-;-- \. 7' ,;* Ve.'''4 J•-'- I I ERIN 0 ',4, • i , , ,� \�` , DOWNTOWN TIGARD O CD tom. v .�‘ , %' ' Project Description OConsiderably less vehicle traffic and more pedestrian traffic can be expected at this gateway. It was conceptually designed as a small public space (i.e. urban room) more than a gateway(i.e. portal). The space will provide a small pedestrian plaza along Ar• �+ Main Street as a place to linger or to orient oneself to F.* downtown as a visitor. More naturalistic forms and . . t : ' materials (absent the traditional icon of columns) ""'``� were preferred b the SWG. ` ' P by Key Features .iidiir A_ 4 '■ ' ' / i .: :- .�f - / -, • Columnar basalt or low walls of fitted stone at �,_ ; /l _' seat wall height(15-18 inches) �� `. � - �. • Stormwater treatment planters (pending full �9 _-.!-. fir-- .a (11,� -� 'Yc - �' analysis of stormwater requirements) -- • Distinctive paving �,`'� �- • Curbless street design(western edge) / • On-street parking oil._ 1l '� � ; • Natural stone bollards for parking and crosswalks ; l ;''l Optional Features ti.., ® ® �,� � ,'++, �4.1,y' ,•v., 7, 'r, ,q, • Wayfinding kiosk for downtown 0�l — .i ;1 j. ij ati�l '.'a.,� i Clock tower ) 1 ,,, ,• Decorative railroad barrier fencing ', . � " r, .=�;j �� Artistic painting and uplighting of the ,. . , understructure of the Highway 99W overpass Estimated Construction Budget: ' $140,000 - $160,000 DRAFT: 6/30/06 Downtown treetscape P a City of Otak, July, 2006 " TI GAR low ateways an • ' u • is paces 1:-IW 99 NAT� RAL TI A T_EWAY . `s• \ NAT,may \ /"%�� ;i_r ' �.:f ,. �.,:, ,��, • / e ,`— ,..,./. fir: / "•(1� ��/ . �x.r~�1�.r• ?',^r `,. ��', tftr" 4q �/ '' 4-...... •l1, �� . . ¶\ V `� Yh /. lath :',/.'‘ t� ' /= DOWNTOWN TIGARD` \- y Y 10`��±Ø� ,� • . k p : :� Project Description ! • • - /j ' , , ; ? This was an optional gateway design for this location. g It was not the option preferred by the Streetscape -,..: . . •r®��n�►►�' '► Working Group. The intent was to explore forms / without the traditional columns, and a palette of "*x :br eNe, materials more natural in character. ' ` .. Key Features ,# "�►� �. • Low walls creating intimate spaces with seating: , f "~ :'s — 7,,,' - Columnar or stacked basalt * ,, �° J ��' j - Stacked"field"stone• .' �S ,. {, �..,--3 -River Rock f:' #,•-,,;1 �� _. J.' III I-1_� Native plants, grasses and paving in a textured N. • Soft surface paving ® • public art,water feature(optional) - IIIII -'""1111111iiiiiii111111111 .- 94115 AP - ,At IN ,,,T"---,._ , 1101111111110 11,1111111 IIII a DRAFT: 6/30/06 Downtown treetscape Pla city of Otak, July, 2006 • —VI GAF ;.>_ • ate-ways an . ' u • is paces • Y 9 9 NAT RAL 1 T 1 AT _ WAY �, .'�" it g ; t' �� ;fr r? 3. r` `r;>C, FCC"` i �� r 1 '� �; -1 J. ' . / t.:\■ !II 1_ , _----r-, 1- .e,.. • (0.114111116 Me ,... � >' DOWNTOWN TIGARD . ,__, t,� Project Description • .y- . _ , � ;. , This was an optional gateway design for this location. L- S� — 1� - It was not the option preferred by the Streetscape Working Group. The intent was to explore forms . 41111. Ilk .� 'INV - — - — - _ -� nc._ __ _ _• without the traditional columns, and a palette of A��'✓ �� l y ■'� , ,y' � ,: �,;� materials more natural in character. ia; �` �� , ;,� . i � �i ,; 4 4 Key Features . i ; 1 ,,,6, 1 �� 1∎ • Low walls creating intimate spaces with seating: - Columnar or stacked basalt 7. X111 , - � ' - Stacked"field" stone J r;,, �' ,. . ,�. iiL River Rock "! IMI �; • Native plants, grasses and paving in a textured grid �- •- t_ • Soft surface paving .' ,' irj� • Public art,water feature (optional) ice, dil lito L--....... ... . L.;1 v g DRAFT: 6/30/06 Downtown treetscape P a city of Otak, July. 2006 TIGAR - - _ - ateways an • - u . lc paces BURNHAM/HALL NATURAL ! TI AT EWAY , , - .0 . 7<1'.VIr'.,.'. •:-.■';..1.":1.-.-to ' •,... .. . - ` r .'' ,.4 •-/ : /''/ ill ( II • 43Z-- • :.,"•:.-•'-', L ‘ ,. ! % ci ......? .., , • ..-- ,,.,..;/.,,.4.100ri . .: -c- :=.' i >, •-„,-'..-4/o-#.— -4- %, lb : - _: . ., , -.I- • !. . ,, ', f :..::> 1 4. ',.:0:''. ,'C't:' '''%.0' '•'4; . i • '' :4, - "s e't P. 4:-..)i` 1 t-, i - - Lit -, :--: "!. ' - 1, .- - -/, •,..,,,,,..A. .i. 41........... .„.-..--• . '4;:-.--s- I,- / . '1-, , . 4:162.„4" \ . • " ._ --. `:r-c' -z ,`-;: •7410.--..-.0,-•-■,;;' -4,, VI rittial -aaarsiii • -':-. \Tyr....iit ." . . .: \,- '...-. cic- ,..,-,..• • !.... •,..; ,. •- -- • . 4.••. . BURN4M ST. .7 \ V - . • . ■-." DOWNTOWN TIGARD . . . • . ' . Project Description c .__ : • i ,,,,-, . ea „...„....„-z_. ..•• -44.17 X , . This was an optional gateway design for this location. . ot - 1 • C.t.:-4..:17(±,-7-4, ' It was not the option preferred by the Streetscape , __ N... . . Working Group. The intent was to explore forms , • without the traditional columns, and a palette of r•In.. /,-.'' ''1,. , op -,- 1101'1001' . =.; .,t . . r1P4 b 1' Ali k i I., • materials more natural in character. r ' ‘ f r , Alt :..-. ' . Key Features . 11111-1:L--. 11: lif 1 t la ot.:- .. ler,.- . . .....• . ii- - , "IP. • Low_cwoailulsmncraeratoinrgstianctkimedatbeasspaiatces with seating: -, -_-_-. NW 11: - PE II - - Stacked"field"stone . -14.151' , al.Z1411 W. --." , . . )8.-Aie: - jail ' - River Rock . • ...A1 ' • Native plants, grasses and paving in a textured .10.49..4„,„ . . --_-• , •• r --- A 1%1 ' ' , grid . _ . ,-. -__....i•Ns, .11 --- . 4;IOW Ill. \ 1 N v , I . \ . . . -=*....... 1 . DRAFT: 6/30/06 Downtown treetscape Pla City of Otak. July. 2006 V I .dfNi■ 1= a- MI. ateways an • mu . is paces /47.::::i.::--ye"......:14.::4:;?:;,:-.::;-#:\-:::;?:::::,51'1:. COMMERCIAL _STREET T_R A � TION A GATEWA 41../ :••{�\ CP �. v '=,;', .4 ' .,0 61/. , ./\%.* V,4;-':.- , -: p � fV�r / :. � • � R iif�Z ,.; '' . • #1.'t, ,tp 1, ~ `� ` � DOWNTOWN TIGARD :fr. c.„..." v. :- �- ' ,�` Project Description O O O This was a traditional gateway design for this location. It was not the option preferred by the Streetscape Working Group.A more natural character was selected. Key Features • Small plaza with sand-set concrete pavers � ', . Masonry seat wall r" ? • Compass rose in paving• °.`r . • Landscaping and trees t Optional Features Information kiosk • Clocktower <- Public art • :: �l • Public restrooms 10 i I- ' _., ; 09 1 F,-.7'-=,`lam ,411....:-.i:: . fr, 11; f g . •- w i I L_.: .440PrAder 1:51 LI % 1111111.1111.1111111111111111111.1111111.1.111.11111........0111111.1111111111111111. ArAr Apr Li 1 o. P DRAFT: 6130106 • . Downtown treetscape P a City of Otak. July, 2006 T 1 G A F= II• ateways and - u • ic paces .4 r r-T1 otloTiffi■ fp,, ,, ,-,,,-„,,,,T„, ,a . .,,, , , 4.. II Jr ik A , , IF lir v ,,,,,, rg4 *$ )1ti,, 4 TRADITIONAL GATEWAYS : Va in • the Material 4 - •A t . ' A tz-- 4 .„,-,111_P Q.Awl-0 4 F..t _II A ci Ito .... 4- .. ...., _....A...-„..:* .-- $1,.. --4,A.. .:g . le Choosing different materials from the Unifying Elements palette can alter the quality of the gateways, softening the forms,making them ----- ..-..,.. t. r-----....1.44.v.,.....,,_::,— .• __ ........._,.......„. ___,..... less heavy,more transparent or more irregular.The Unifying• ews. fil , . Elements palette is intended to be flexible and allow the kind of variety illustrated below to emerge in the final design. 1 •,,,..-- 1 ', ..-r-r ,--- 1 • t_i: = ,ii - _, - . _ , . ... ...o, ,.....7 1 .,;.....,. .....,... , , , 1 ,,,, „ ,,...... _., _.- , /-----iikls, - ,. - ,--...,.. t.s4 , m , ... . ,. ,.e,........ 114, , ,. .2.,...:,--i 5111111 _. _._ _. ...... q j _:.,..- ;,..... __ •--. 1 - - ..:,tdc:;', 'WOW-1107f TATIV illAilrgfir rergypwryA w .r....,,,,,.. :rniiiiPs51",k:!,;;;,----,, „ ---i>'-: ' - V V If 1' .ii.--1 1„mtl-,•,• , -,.. .. ,_:.....,..1.:,,,,....g.,. - : ..Aii vi v 4 Fillri, . J04 .t:'i.'-;7:711;.'`.,I II ft ti•t ".1!".•-•"'%.%‘::.,!!g"::Wr 4 -nf-:1 'i.:• • .jks-'\ •, ''..7 ..,.`'.'' '.. .4..'"*":::',1.-1 . 11111 1 -f. 1 4 ( le )4., _...4 ,i f Ari Is. . .... ..z..-tr, ,:c..„...-.2,-0 sig_stif..: -r...._ . -1 ,,,.., .:-.-, .. ---.„...,,-,.....i :: ''.4 ;‘, A.,, 1 ,,,l..„- _ : . :..........1r... ....... Ilt Brick and Black Railing: Open railing replaces the masonry wall. ' N *- ■-"A'■ ii‘■1,'- lor... —wwwill- - .---04ar W , I\ -1.-..--• ri.14:10‘4,n‘' ilifigiiHipt__i__________...------- • — 1 t , - - ■ ' , ' . • Nmg-ve----Tifirf ltilifi, ifillny- Toriffilplis, . ,. .,... -A..., . , • T.-1,47- ,. it At- i 11 ft iirigt _.... . . . - % 10 Ifiti i#,.. it Lii lig A ,$, A iltr _, el .41„at , :,,,.. . ',4';.,•‘7. , .. •i' '17 , .. ,... „... Alia, _.,..,„,„e'_',2-..„,„-4 Wita1011.1-0 4 fit 1 Ifi. ilm . g •• , I!iii-",o4 4.-• , - 1 z-44‘. PI f._ - . titiolr -- - ‘i,ifitU i Zig a rtil,i-41:11,2q;;r1...■1.--,--'" r".1..V41111111, %lbw 411- 1.- 1-lil ------------------■•■■•• ......4---.----1.-----"kin , ■ IlldiLlr- *.S " -' ____ - . 1, 11 ---- -412k -leftrZ ■ ; IMMO thaNNI■ \ ilt.' 411. Columnar Basalt Stone:Naturalistic materials replace"bricks \ 1 ...4.4■••• 1. and mortar."Fundamental forms of columns and walls are ---,..4%,... "-y,;---t. .„..,:ez„ -Wel- - , , . still visible. i- -'; -- - -'`--- - ----- 1-1 ..""1"--- 1111 __-- ..,...P .--, --- - - ■ -: e-- 1-----,,--' - . ___,,„ ,_,_-,,..■=_--'--,_ - -- ,'" . V.- ---_,.- .-v'' - %1 _-...--4-• ."', i. rir ,..,., .' j ,,f TT,- .; , , ,-, ''' •4, . Stone Columns and Walls: Walls and column move toward !loll r. -", • . ..,'-v't, . . naturalistic materials. , ...:- . ... - - 41.: -•- - ••• DRAFT 6/30/06 tyi - . _efs ,,•.- . • Downtown treetscape Pla City of Otak, July. 2006 ---"T"- I GI ■Ifnl■ R. ND